(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):
INDEX
| | | |
| | Page No.(s) |
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION | | |
| | | |
Item 1. | Financial Statements | | |
| | | |
| Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2008 (unaudited) and | | |
| December 31, 2007 (audited) | | 1 |
| | | |
| Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, | | 2 |
| 2008 and 2007 (unaudited) | | |
| | | |
| Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, | | 3 |
| 2008 and 2007 (unaudited) | | |
| | | |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | | 4 |
| | | |
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | | 8 |
| | | |
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | | 13 |
| | | |
Item 4T. | Controls and Procedures | | 14 |
| | | |
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION | | |
| | | |
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings | | 16 |
| | | |
Item 1A. | Risk Factors | | 16 |
| | | |
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | | 16 |
| | | |
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities | | 16 |
| | | |
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to Vote of Security Holders | | 16 |
| | | |
Item 5. | Other Information | | 16 |
| | | |
Item 6. | Exhibits | | 16 |
| | | |
SIGNATURES | | 17 |
PART I - CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements |
NOTE: These consolidated financial statements reflect the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2008 (unaudited) and December 31, 2007 (audited), the unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations and unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, including entries that resulted from a restatement of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for prior periods.
Sky Petroleum, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
| | | |
| | March 31, 2008 | | December 31, 2007 | |
| | Unaudited | | Audited | |
| | | | | |
Assets | | | | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 5,073,433 | | $ | 5,557,898 | |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | | 38,475 | | | 6,841 | |
Total current assets | | | 5,111,908 | | | 5,564,739 | |
Investment in oil and gas properties, net - full cost | | | | | | | |
method of accounting (Note 4) | | | 2,210,589 | | | 2,869,755 | |
Fixed assets, net | | | 2,911 | | | 3,406 | |
Deposits and other assets | | | 4,209 | | | 4,209 | |
Investment in non-affiliated entity (Note 5) | | | 1,000,000 | | | 1,000,000 | |
Total other assets | | | 3,217,709 | | | 3,877,370 | |
Total Assets | | $ | 8,329,617 | | $ | 9,442,109 | |
| | | | | | | |
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (Note 6) | | $ | 1,285,872 | | $ | 1,291,601 | |
| | | | | | | |
Commitments and contingencies | | | — | | | — | |
| | | | | | | |
Stockholders’ Equity | | | | | | | |
Series A Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, no | | | | | | | |
shares issued and outstanding (Note 3) | | | — | | | — | |
Common Stock, $0.001 par value, 150,000,000 shares authorized, 58,793,709 | | | | | | | |
shares issued and outstanding | | | 58,794 | | | 58,794 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 40,497,226 | | | 40,226,257 | |
Cumulative translation adjustment | | | 7 | | | (70 | ) |
Accumulated deficit | | | (33,512,282 | ) | | (32,134,473 | ) |
Total Stockholders’ Equity | | | 7,043,745 | | | 8,150,508 | |
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | | $ | 8,329,617 | | $ | 9,442,109 | |
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
1
Sky Petroleum, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
| | | |
| | Three Months Ended, March 31, | |
| | 2008 | | 2007 | |
| | | | Restated | |
| | | | (Note 2) | |
Oil revenues | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | |
Expenses: | | | | | | | |
Lease operating expenses (Note 4) | | | — | | | — | |
Depletion and depreciation (Note 4) | | | 659,659 | | | 591,673 | |
Consulting services | | | 125,062 | | | 206,122 | |
Stock-based compensation (Note 7) | | | 270,969 | | | 553,335 | |
Compensation – related party | | | — | | | 52,500 | |
Other general and administrative | | | 360,302 | | | 205,107 | |
Total expenses | | | 1,415,992 | | | 1,608,737 | |
| | | | | | | |
Net operating loss | | | (1,415,992 | ) | | (1,608,737 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Other income: | | | | | | | |
Interest income | | | 38,183 | | | 66,996 | |
Total other income | | | 38,183 | | | 66,996 | |
| | | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (1,377,809 | ) | $ | (1,541,741 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Dividends on Preferred Stock | | | — | | | (192,500 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Net loss applicable to common stockholders | | $ | (1,377,809 | ) | $ | (1,734,241 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Net loss per share - basic and diluted | | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Weighted average of number of common shares outstanding – basic and diluted | | | 58,793,709 | | | 46,571,485 | |
| | | | | | | |
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. |
2
Sky Petroleum, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
| | | |
| | Three Months Ended, March 31, | |
| | 2008 | | 2007 | |
| | | | Restated | |
Cash flows from operating activities | | | | (Note 2) | |
Net loss | | $ | (1,377,809 | ) | $ | (1,541,741 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | | | | | | | |
Stock-based compensation | | | 270,969 | | | 553,335 | |
Depletion and depreciation | | | 659,659 | | | 591,673 | |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable | | | — | | | 1,140,471 | |
Prepaid and other current assets | | | (31,632 | ) | | (67,275 | ) |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | | (5,729 | ) | | (55,002 | ) |
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | | | (484,542 | ) | | 621,461 | |
| | | | | | | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | | | |
Investment in non-affiliated entity | | | — | | | (1,000,000 | ) |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | — | | | (1,000,000 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | | | |
Cumulative translation adjustment | | | 77 | | | — | |
Preferred stock dividends payment | | | — | | | (192,500 | ) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | | 77 | | | (192,500 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Net decrease in cash | | | (484,465 | ) | | (571,039 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of period | | | 5,557,898 | | | 5,810,763 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of period | | $ | 5,073,433 | | $ | 5,239,724 | |
| | | | | | | |
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
Sky Petroleum, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1- Description of Business - Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation
The Company was organized on August 22, 2002 under the laws of the State of Nevada, as The Flower Valet. On December 20, 2004, the Company amended its articles of incorporation to change its name to Seaside Explorations, Inc. Subsequently, on March 28, 2005 the Company changed its name to Sky Petroleum, Inc.
The Company is engaged in exploration and development of oil and natural gas properties of others under arrangements in which we finance the costs in exchange for interests in the oil or natural gas revenue generated by the properties. Such arrangements are commonly referred to as farm-ins to us, or farm-outs by the property owners farming out to us.
In order to manage its international oil and gas operations, the Company established two corporations in Cyprus. Bekata Limited (“Bekata”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sky Petroleum, Inc. owns a 100% interest in Sastaro Limited (“Sastaro”).
Sastaro entered into a Participation Agreement for the financing of a drilling program in the Mubarek field, an offshore region in a concession area surrounding Abu Musa Island in the Arabian Gulf, with Buttes Gas and Oil Co. International Inc., (“Buttes”) a wholly-owned subsidiary of Crescent Petroleum Company International Limited. Under the terms of the Participation Agreement, Sastaro has the right to participate in a share of the future production revenue due to its funding $25 million in drilling costs related to two wells in an off-shore oil and gas project in the United Arab Emirates. The Participation Agreement does not grant Sastaro any interest in the concession area. Sastaro’s rights are limited to receiving a share of future production revenue, if any.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary corporations, after elimination of all material intercompany accounts, transactions and profits.
Certain information, accounting policies and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted in this Form 10-Q Quarterly Report pursuant to certain rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Unless otherwise indicated or unless the context otherwise requires, all references to “Sky”, “the Company”, “we”, “us”, and “our” are to Sky Petroleum, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, Sastaro and Bekata.
Note 2 - Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements
Management determined that the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2007 required restatement of certain amounts and balances presented as a result of the following: (i) an error in following the Company’s revenue recognition criteria, (ii) an error in calculating depletion, (iii) an error in recording stock-based compensation, and (iv) an error and reclassification of general and administrative expenses.
The following table presents the effect of the restatements made to the Company's previously reported consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2007:
| | For the three months ended March 31, 2007 | |
| | Previously Reported | | Adjustments | | Restated | |
Statement of Operations: | | | | | | | |
Oil Revenue | | $ | 969,226 | | $ | (969,226 | ) | $ | -- | |
Lease operating expenses | | | 53,501 | | | (53,301 | ) | | -- | |
Depletion and depreciation | | | 499,854 | | | 91,819 | | | 591,673 | |
Stock-based compensation | | | 478,106 | | | 75,229 | | | 553,335 | |
Other general and administrative | | | 190,885 | | | 14,222 | | | 205,107 | |
Net operating loss | | | (511,542 | ) | | (1,097,195 | ) | | (1,608,737 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
4
Net loss | | | (444,546 | ) | | (1,097,195 | ) | | (1,541,741 | ) |
Net loss applicable to common stockholders | | | (637,046 | ) | | (1,097,195 | ) | | (1,734,241 | ) |
Net loss per share, basic and diluted | | | (0.01 | ) | | (0.03 | ) | | (0.04 | ) |
Note 3- Stockholders’ Equity
Preferred Stock
Each share of Series “A” Preferred Stock was entitled to receive a dividend of 7% per annum prior and in preference to the Common Stock of the Company. The dividend began to accrue on December 30, 2005, and was payable quarterly thereafter. The dividend was cumulative. In the event of a liquidation or acquisition of the Company, the holders of the Series “A” Preferred Stock were entitled to receive an amount equal to any accrued and unpaid dividend prior and in preference to any distributions to the holders of the Common Stock. Thereafter, the holders of the Series “A” Preferred Stock were entitled to participate in distributions on an as converted to Common Stock basis. The Company paid dividends totaling $192,500 to the holders of the Series “A” Preferred Stock as of March 31, 2007. On April 20 2007, the Company issued 12,222,224 shares of common stock upon the conversion of all 3,055,556 shares of Series "A" Preferred Stock. The Company has no preferred stock outstanding and is no longer obligated to make dividend payments on any Series "A" Preferred Stock.
Note 4- Investment in Oil and Gas Properties
On May 18, 2005, the Company entered into a “Participation Agreement” with Buttes whereby the Company was to provide cash in the amount of $25,000,000, to be used for drilling costs associated with two oil wells located in the Arabian Gulf in exchange for a variable percentage of future production revenue. Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company provided capital to Buttes in developmental increments. Upon commencement of production, which occurred in May 2006, the Company received a preferred 75% of combined production revenue until such time as the Company has recouped its total investment and thereafter an incremental decrease of production revenue to 40% until the Company has recouped two times its initial investment and thereafter at 9.2%.
As of December 31, 2007, Buttes estimates that the actual drilling costs are approximately $54,000,000 exceeding the $25,000,000 and reducing the Company’s preferred share of combined production revenue from 75% to 34.67% until such time as the Company has recouped its total investment and thereafter an incremental decrease of production revenue to 18.49% until the Company has recouped two times its initial investment and thereafter at 4.25%.
The Company’s operating costs are capped at $3.00 per barrel and royalty fees are 14.5% of gross production revenues under the Participation Agreement. As there were no oil lifts during the first quarters of 2008 and 2007, no lease operating expenses were recorded.
As of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company’s Investment in Oil and Gas Properties was comprised of the following:
| | March 31, | | December 31, | |
Evaluated Properties: | | 2008 | | 2007 | |
Mubarek H2 Well | | $ | 13,457,501 | | $ | 13,457,501 | |
| | | | | | | |
Mubarek K2-ST4 Well | | | 13,173,901 | | | 13,173,901 | |
| | | | | | | |
Accumulated Depletion | | | (9,848,440 | ) | | (9,189,274 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Impairment | | | (14,572,373 | ) | | (14,572,373 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 2,210,589 | | $ | 2,869,755 | |
As of March 31, 2008, the Company has capitalized drilling and completion costs incurred for the Mubarek H2 well of $13,457,501 and the Mubarek K2 well of $13,173,901. Based on the December 31, 2007 reserve report prepared by ESG, an entity considered to
5
be an affiliate of the Company due to a mutual director having ownership in ESG, proven developed reserves, net to the Company’s interest were 39,906 barrels of oil. During the three months ended March 31, 2008, 9,166 barrels of oil net to the Company’s interest were produced from the Mubarek H2 and K2-ST4 wells, resulting in depletion expense of $659,165 being recorded for the first quarter of 2008.
Note 5- Investment in Non-Affiliated Entity
In March 2007, the Company acquired a minority stake in the development of an oilfield in the Komi Republic of the Russian Federation by investing $1,000,000 in Pechora Energy through its UK parent company, Concorde Oil & Gas Plc. ("Concorde"). This acquisition is essentially a carried interest as the Company will not be required to contribute additional funds as Concorde intends to fund the field development through debt and production revenues, although Concorde may raise additional stockholder equity which would have the effect of diluting our interest. Pechora Energy holds the production license for the Luzskoye field in the Komi Republic, where it is carrying out appraisal drilling on the field. Production has increased as a result of drilling these new wells and through the work-over existing wells. The reserves and final development plan will be determined following the results of the current appraisal drilling program. The Company also has the right to participate in any other acquisitions Concorde makes in the Timan Pechora Basin.
Note 6 - Related Party Transactions
During 2008 and 2007, the Company had a Consulting and Business Development Agreement with Energy Services Group Dubai (“ESG”), a related party. Pursuant to the agreement, ESG is to provide certain business development services to the Company. For the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company recorded consulting expense of $32,835 and $72,375, respectively, related to this contract. At March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, $32,835 and $168,000, respectively, of these consulting fees were included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. One of the Company’s directors is the founding partner of ESG.
Note 7 - Stock Options
There were no stock options granted, cancelled or exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2008.
| | Number Of Shares | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Weighted Average Remaining Contract Life (Years) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Options Outstanding at March 31, 2008 | | | 3,699,999 | | $ | 1.08 | | | 3.88 | | |
Options Exercisable at March 31, 2008 | | | 2,833,333 | | $ | 1.06 | | | 3.35 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The following table summarizes information about stock options as at March 31, 2008:
| | Shares Underlying Options Outstanding | | Shares Underlying Options Exercisable | |
Range of Exercise Prices | | Shares Underlying Options Outstanding | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years) | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Shares Underlying Options Exercisable | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | |
$0.50 | | | 133,333 | | | 0.58 | | $ | 0.50 | | | 133,333 | | $ | 0.50 | |
$1.00 | | | 2,766,666 | | | 3.20 | | $ | 1.00 | | | 2,166,667 | | $ | 1.00 | |
$1.29 – 1.88 | | | 800,000 | | | 6.78 | | $ | 1.44 | | | 533,333 | | $ | 1.44 | |
The total unrecognized stock-based compensation related to non-vested options of $634,072 will be recognized over the remaining weighted average vesting period of 0.73 years. The aggregate intrinsic value of exercisable options as of March 31, 2008 and 2007 was $nil and $667, respectively.
6
Note 8 - Income Taxes
For the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company incurred net operating losses and, accordingly, no provision for income taxes has been recorded. In addition, no benefit for income taxes has been recorded due to the uncertainty of the realization of any tax assets. At March 31, 2008, the Company has accumulated operating losses totaling $33,512,282. The net operating loss carry forwards will begin to expire in 2019 if not utilized. The Company has recorded net operating loss carry forwards in each year since its inception and through March 31, 2008. Based upon all available objective evidence, including the Company’s loss history, management believes it is more likely than not that the net deferred assets will not be fully realized. Therefore, the Company has provided a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets at March 31, 2008.
All of the Company’s current oil and gas activities are located offshore the coast of Dubai, UAE and there are no income taxes due as no earnings or dividends were distributed or repatriated.
Undistributed earnings of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are considered to be indefinitely reinvested and, accordingly, no provision for U.S. federal income taxes has been provided thereon. Upon distribution of those earnings in the form of dividends or otherwise, the Company may be subject to both U.S. income taxes (subject to an adjustment for foreign tax credits) and withholding taxes payable to the foreign countries.
The Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries have not filed required foreign and U.S. tax returns due for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006, and 2007. No material tax liability is anticipated however the Company will not be in compliance until such reporting is made. Management has begun discussions with qualified firms to identify and prepare delinquent tax returns for filing. Amounts due, if any, would not be material. Therefore, no accrual has been made for potential tax liabilities, penalties or interest.
Note 9 - Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a market-based framework or hierarchy for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is applicable whenever another accounting pronouncement requires or permits assets and liabilities to be measured at fair value. SFAS 157 does not expand or require any new fair value measures; however, the application of this statement may change current practice. The requirements of SFAS 157 are first effective for the Company’s fiscal year beginning January 1, 2008. However, in February 2008 the FASB decided that an entity need not apply this standard to non-financial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a nonrecurring basis until the subsequent year. The initial adoption of SFAS 157 did not have a material effect on the Company's financial condition or results of operations. However, the Company is still in the process of evaluating this standard with respect to its effect on non-financial assets and liabilities and therefore has not yet determined the impact that it will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements upon full adoption.
In December 2007, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) 110 Share-Based Payment. SAB 110 amends and replaces Question 6 of Section D.2 of Topic 14, “Share-Based Payment,” of the Staff Accounting Bulletin series. Question 6 of Section D.2 of Topic 14 expresses the views of the staff regarding the use of the “simplified” method in developing an estimate of the expected term of “plain vanilla” share options and allows usage of the “simplified” method for share option grants prior to December 31, 2007. SAB 110 allows public companies which do not have historically sufficient experience to provide a reasonable estimate to continue use of the “simplified” method for estimating the expected term of “plain vanilla” share option grants after December 31, 2007. SAB 110 was effective January 1, 2008. The Company has used the “simplified” method to estimate the expected term for share option grants as it does not have enough historical experience to provide a reasonable estimate. The Company will continue to use the “simplified” method until it has enough historical experience to provide a reasonable estimate of expected term in accordance with SAB 110. The adoption of SAB 110 did not have a material impact on its consolidated balance sheets, statements of operations and cash flows.
7
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
NOTE: Certain parts of the following Item 2. Plan of Operation reflect the effects of the restatement of our consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2007.
Description of Property
Our principal corporate and executive offices are located at 401 Congress Avenue, Suite 1540, Austin, Texas 78701. Our telephone number is (512) 687-3427. We rent our office space. We do not currently maintain any investments in real estate, real estate mortgages or securities of persons primarily engaged in real estate activities, nor do we expect to do so in the foreseeable future.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with our financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this report. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including, but not limited to, those set forth elsewhere in this report.
This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes. The discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations are based upon the unaudited consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires the company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of any contingent liabilities at the financial statement date and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis the company reviews its estimates and assumptions. The estimates were based on historical experience and other assumptions that the company believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results are likely to differ from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions, but the company does not believe such differences will materially affect our financial position or results of operations. Critical accounting policies, the policies the company believes are most important to the presentation of its financial statements and require the most difficult, subjective and complex judgments, are outlined below in “Critical Accounting Policies,” and have not changed significantly.
In addition, certain statements made in this report may constitute “forward-looking statements”. These forward-looking statements involve known or unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, performance, or achievements of the company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Except for historical information, the matters set forth herein, which are forward-looking statements, involve certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ. Potential risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the success of the current infill drilling programs, Sky Petroleum’s ability to access opportunities, the contemplated continued production at the Mubarek field, our expectations related to the Sir Abu Nu’Ayr Island Project, the competitive environment within the oil and gas industry, the extent and cost effectiveness with which Sky Petroleum is able to implement exploration and development programs in the oil and gas industry, obtaining drilling equipment on a timely fashion, commodity price risk, and the market acceptance and successful technical and economic implementation of Sky Petroleum’s intended plan. Forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continues” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. Although Sky Petroleum believes that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, the company cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements.
Overview
Our primary business is to identify opportunities to either make direct property acquisitions or to fund exploration or development of oil and natural gas properties of others under arrangements in which we will finance the costs in exchange for interests in the oil or natural gas revenue generated by the properties. Such arrangements are commonly referred to as farm-ins to us, or farm-outs by the property owners farming out to us.
We were incorporated in the state of Nevada in August, 2002 as The Flower Valet. In 2004, we began to reassess our business plan and to seek business opportunities in other industries, including the oil and gas industry. On December 20, 2004, at our annual meeting of stockholders, our stockholders approved an amendment to our Articles of Incorporation, changing our name from The Flower Valet to Seaside Exploration, Inc. Subsequently, on March 28, 2005, we changed our name from Seaside Exploration, Inc. to Sky Petroleum, Inc. and began actively identifying opportunities to make direct property acquisitions and to fund exploration and development of oil and natural gas properties.
8
As part of our business strategy, we, through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Sastaro, entered into a Participation Agreement for the financing of a drilling program in the Mubarek field, an offshore region in a concession area surrounding Abu Musa Island in the Arabian Gulf, with Buttes Gas and Oil Co. International Inc., (Buttes) a wholly-owned subsidiary of Crescent Petroleum Company International Limited. Under the terms of the Participation Agreement, Sastaro has the right to participate in a share of the future production revenue by contributing $25 million in drilling costs related to two wells in an off-shore oil and gas project in the United Arab Emirates. The Participation Agreement does not grant Sastaro any interest in the concession area. Sastaro’s rights are limited to receiving a share of future production revenue, if any.
Mubarek H2 Well
Since the Mubarek H2 well was completed in the second quarter of 2006, it has produced a total of approximately 124,472 gross barrels as of March 31, 2008. During the first quarter of 2008, the Mubarek H2 well produced approximately 9,144 gross barrels and averaging 101 bopd. Actual production may vary from our forecasts or estimates, and does not include any additional production from other Mubarek wells, planned or contemplated, if any.
Mubarek K2-ST4 Well
The Mubarek K2-ST4 was drilled on the northwest part of the field proximal to the K1 location. Mubarek K1 was drilled as Thamama producer (a deeper gas condensate reservoir underlying the Ilam/Mishrif) and electric log readings over the Ilam/Mishrif section indicated a good oil saturated reservoir. Drilling of the second well commenced during the second quarter of 2007.
Since the Mubarek K2-ST4 well was completed, it has produced a total of approximately 60,247 gross barrels as of March 31, 2008. During the first quarter of 2008, the Mubarek K2-ST4 well produced approximately 21,778 barrels and averaged approximately 239 bopd. Actual production may vary from our forecasts or estimates, and does not include any additional production from other Mubarek wells, planned or contemplated, if any.
Other Projects
We have acquired a minority stake in the development of an oilfield in the Komi Republic of the Russian Federation by investing $1,000,000 in Pechora Energy through its UK parent company, Concorde Oil & Gas Plc. ("Concorde"). This acquisition is essentially a carried interest as the Company will not be required to contribute additional funds as Concorde intends to fund the field development through debt and production revenues, although Concorde may raise additional stockholder equity which would have the effect of diluting our interest. Pechora Energy holds the production license for the Luzskoye field in the Komi Republic, where it is carrying out appraisal drilling on the field. Production has increased as a result of drilling these new wells and through the work-over existing wells. The reserves and final development plan will be determined following the results of the current appraisal drilling program. The Company also has the right to participate in any other acquisitions Concorde makes in the Timan Pechora Basin.
Plan of Operation
Our plan of operation and business strategy is to focus on producing or near-production oil and gas properties in the Middle East, North Africa and the Former Soviet Union (FSU). We intend to seek niche opportunities through the contacts of our officers and directors in the region. We intend to limit our administrative and overhead expenses by seeking operating partners and participating in projects as non-operator. We intend to use contractors or consultants as much and where possible.
As the Company has sufficient working capital, our goal during the next twelve months ending March 31, 2009 is to assess and obtain additional joint venture opportunities in new regions.
The strategic overview of Sky Petroleum is as follows:
| • | To identify opportunities to participate in oil and gas projects in the Middle East, North Africa and the FSU through strategic participation agreements, farm-ins or joint ventures. |
| • | To focus initially on lower risk development or exploitation projects in areas with known oil or natural gas reserves / production and infrastructure. |
| • | To participate as a non-operator on projects with working operators with experience in a specific region. |
9
| • | To raise sufficient capital to fund our operations and to establish ongoing production revenue. |
Our plan of operation includes the following goals during the next twelve months:
| • | Evaluate new farm-in / joint venture opportunities in the Middle East, North Africa and the FSU. |
| • | Negotiate an agreement with Buttes on Sir Abu Nu’Ayr project and fund a work program. |
| • | Participate in our project with Pechora Energy. |
There can be no assurance that we will successfully implement our business strategy or meet our goals during the next twelve months, if ever.
Overall Performance
As discussed in the overview, the Company revised its business plan in late 2004 to seek business opportunities in other industries, including the oil and gas industry. In early 2005, the Company moved ahead with this strategy and commenced to add staff and raise capital. This plan took several months to proceed and in the second quarter of 2005, we added consultants familiar with the oil and gas business, signed a Participation Agreement to drill wells in the United Arab Emirates and commenced raising capital.
The variances in comparable financial and operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2008 versus the same periods in 2007 may appear disproportionate as a result of production from the Mubarek K2-ST4 well commencing in the fourth quarter of 2007.
Operations
Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements
Management determined that the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the period ended March 31, 2007 required restatement of certain amounts and balances presented as a result of the following: (i) an error in following the Company’s revenue recognition criteria, (ii) an error in calculating depletion, (iii) an error in recording stock-based compensation, and (iv) an error and reclassification of general and administrative expenses.
Comparison of the three months ended March 31, 2008 with the three months ended March 31, 2007
For the three months ended March 31, 2008, we had a net loss of $1,377,809 as compared to a net loss of $1,541,741 for the three months ended March 31, 2007. We had no revenue reported during the first quarters 2008 and 2007 as there were no oil lifts from the Mubarek H2 and K2-ST4 wells. The reduction in net loss resulted from a 12% decrease in expenses, from $1,608,737 during the first quarter of 2007 to $1,415,992 during the first quarter of 2008.
Total expenses were lower in the first quarter of 2008 as compared with the first quarter of 2007 largely as a result of lower stock-based compensation offset by slightly higher depletion based on unit production from both wells. Stock-based compensation decreased to $270,969 for the three months ended March 31, 2008 as compared to $553,335 for the three months ended March 31, 2007. Depletion and depreciation increased to $659,659 for the three months ended March 31, 2008 as compared to $591,673 for the three months ended March 31, 2007.
Excluding stock-based compensation and depletion and depreciation, expenses for the first quarter of 2008 were up slightly $21,635 or approximately 5% as compared to the same quarter in 2007 primarily due to higher legal and accounting fees related to the restatement of the prior year’s financial statements. Included in expense is consulting services of $125,062 as compared to $206,122 for the first quarter of 2007; investor relations expenses of $65,447 compared to $9,731, respectively; professional fees of $126,394 compared to $27,435, respectively; directors fees of $53,250 compared to $37,500, respectively; and other general and administrative expenses of $115,211 compared to $130,441, respectively. There was no related party compensation expenses in the first quarter 2008 compared to $52,500 in 2007.
Additionally, we had lower interest income during the three months ended March 31, 2008, of $38,183 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2007 of $66,996. This income came from short-term investments of the Company’s excess cash during the period which decreased between 2008 and 2007 as funds were used in the drilling activities as well as lower interest rates carried on invested cash.
Cash used in operating activities was $484,542 during the three months ended March 31, 2008, as compared to cash flows provided of $621,461 for the comparable period in 2007. The negative cash flow from operating activities during the first quarter of 2008 offset by non-cash charges
10
consisting of increased depletion and depreciation was $659,659 as compared to $591,673 for the first quarter of 2007, and stock-based compensation of $270,969 as compared to $553,335 for the first quarter of 2007. We used total cash of $484,465 during the three months ended March 31, 2008 as compared to $571,039 for the comparable period in 2007. Total cash decreased to $5,073,433 at March 31, 2008 versus $5,239,724 at March 31, 2007. We had no investing activities during the first quarter 2008 compared to $1,000,000 investment in non-affiliated entity in 2007. We had $77 for cumulative translation adjustment during the first quarter 2008 compared to $192,500 payment of dividend on Series “A” Preferred Stock in 2007.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
A component of our operating plan is the ability to obtain additional capital through additional equity and/or debt financing to fund future additional prospects. Our only source of internal operating cash flow, if any, will be derived from our participation interest in the Mubarek Field, if the project is successful.
Since inception, we have financed our cash flow requirements through the issuance of common stock and preferred stock. As we expand our activities, we may from time to time experience net negative cash flows from operations pending receipt of periodic receipt of sales proceeds. The Company may use excess cash investments, debt or equity financing to augment working capital.
As of March 31, 2008, we have raised approximately $38,000,000 through private placements of shares of common stock and shares of convertible preferred stock as well as through the conversion of convertible debt.
Net cash used by operating activities during the quarter ended March 31, 2008 was $484,542 as compared to net cash provided of $621,461 for the comparable period in 2007. Total assets as of March 31, 2008 were $8,329,617 compared to total assets of $9,442,109 as of December 31, 2007. Stockholders’ equity as of March 31, 2008 was $7,043,745 compared to stockholders’ equity of $8,150,508 as of December 31, 2007. The decrease in assets was primarily due to (i) depletion for the Mubarek wells and (ii) use of cash and cash equivalents. The Company had $3,826,036 of working capital at March 31, 2008 compared to $4,273,138 at December 31, 2007.
As of March 31, 2008, we had current assets of $5,111,908 including cash and cash equivalents of $5,073,433 of which $4,860,459 was held in time deposits. We had current liabilities of $1,285,872, of which $986,768 is owed to Buttes due to the retroactive reduction of the Company’s revenue entitlement under the Participation Agreement. Buttes will deduct future revenues due us until such time as this balance is paid.
The Company follows the full cost method of accounting for its oil and gas operations whereby exploration and development expenditures are capitalized. Such costs may include geological and geophysical, drilling, equipment and technical consulting directly related to exploration and development activities. Costs related to unproved properties and major development projects may be excluded from costs subject to depletion until proved reserves have been determined or their value is impaired.
As of March 31, 2008, the Company has capitalized drilling and completion costs incurred for the Mubarek H2 and Mubarek K2-ST4 wells of $13,457,501 and $13,173,901, respectively. Based upon the December 31, 2007, reserve report prepared by ESG, who is considered an affiliate of the Company due to a mutual director having an ownership interest in ESG, proved developed reserves net to the Company's interests were 39,906 barrels of oil. During the quarter ended March 31, 2008, 9,166 barrels of oil net to the Company's interest were produced from the Mubarek H2 and K2-ST4 wells, resulting in depletion expense of $659,165 being recorded.
Since the Mubarek H2 well was completed in the second quarter of 2006, it has produced a total of approximately 124,472 gross barrels as of March 31, 2008. During the first quarter of 2008, the Mubarek H2 well produced approximately 9,144 gross barrels and averaging 101 bopd. Actual production may vary from our forecasts or estimates, and does not include any additional production from other Mubarek wells, planned or contemplated, if any.
Since the Mubarek K2-ST4 well was completed, it has produced a total of approximately 60,247 gross barrels as of March 31, 2008. During the first quarter of 2008, the Mubarek K2-ST4 well produced approximately 21,778 barrels and averaged approximately 239 bopd. Actual production may vary from our forecasts or estimates, and does not include any additional production from other Mubarek wells, planned or contemplated, if any.
Over the next twelve months, we believe that existing capital and anticipated funds from operations, if any, will be sufficient to sustain operations.
Our lack of operating history makes predictions of future operating results difficult to ascertain. Our prospects must be considered in light of the risks, expenses and difficulties frequently encountered by companies in their early stage of development, particularly companies searching for opportunities in the oil and gas industry. Such risks include, but are not limited to, our ability to secure a drilling rig, our ability to successfully drill for hydrocarbons, commodity price fluctuations, delays in drilling or bringing production, if any, on line, an evolving business model and unpredictable availability of qualified oil and gas exploration prospects and the management of growth. To address these risks we must, among other things, implement and successfully execute our business and development plan, successfully identify
11
future drilling locations, continue to rely on Buttes efforts, respond to competitive developments, and attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in addressing such risks, and the failure to do so can have material adverse effect on our business prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2008, we had no material transactions affecting our liquidity and capital resources.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Inflation
We do not believe that inflation has had a significant impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
Critical Accounting Policies
Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.
Fair value of financial instruments
Fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of March 31, 2008 and 2007. The respective carrying value of certain on-balance sheet financial instruments approximated their fair values. These financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents and investments. Fair values were assumed to approximate carrying values for cash, cash equivalents and payables because they are short term in nature and their carrying amounts approximate fair values as they are payable on demand.
Investment in oil and gas properties
The Company follows the full cost method of accounting for oil and gas operations whereby exploration and development expenditures are capitalized. Such costs may include geological and geophysical, drilling, equipment and technical consulting directly related to exploration and development activities. The aggregate of net capitalized costs and estimated future development costs is amortized using the unit of production method based on estimated proved oil and gas reserves.
Advances for oil and gas interests are transferred to oil and gas properties as actual exploration and development expenditures are incurred. This commenced in January 2006.
Costs related to unproved properties and major development projects may be excluded from costs subject to depletion until proved reserves have been determined or their value is impaired. These properties are assessed periodically and any impairment is transferred to costs subject to depletion. No such impairments have been identified by management.
Under the full cost method of accounting, the net book value of oil and natural gas properties, less related deferred income taxes, may not exceed a calculated “ceiling”. The ceiling limitation is the discounted estimated after-tax future net cash flows from proved oil and natural gas properties. In calculating future net cash flows, current prices and costs are generally held constant indefinitely as adjusted for qualifying cash flow hedges. The net book value of oil and natural gas properties, less related deferred income taxes is compared to the ceiling on a quarterly and annual basis. Any excess of the net book value, less related deferred income taxes, is generally written off as an expense. Under rules and regulations of the SEC, all or a portion of the excess above the ceiling may not be written off if, subsequent to the end of the quarter or year but prior to the release of the financial results, prices have increased sufficiently that all or a portion of such excess above the ceiling would not have existed if the increased prices were used in the calculations. As of December 31, 2007, the Company had an accumulated impairment of $14,572,373 as a result of the full cost ceiling test.
Revenue is recognized in the period in which title to the petroleum or natural gas transfers to the purchaser.
Income taxes
We follow Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (“SFAS No. 109”) for recording the provision for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are computed based upon the difference between the financial statement and income tax basis of assets and liabilities using the enacted marginal tax rate applicable when the related asset or liability is expected to be realized or settled. Deferred income tax expenses or benefits are based on the changes in the asset or liability each period. If available evidence suggests that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, a valuation
12
allowance is required to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. Future changes in such valuation allowance are included in the provision for deferred income taxes in the period of change. Deferred income taxes may arise from temporary differences resulting from income and expense items reported for financial accounting and tax purposes in different periods. Deferred taxes are classified as current or non-current, depending on the classification of assets and liabilities to which they relate. Deferred taxes arising from temporary differences that are not related to an asset or liability are classified as current or non-current depending on the periods in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse.
All of the Company's current oil and gas activities are located offshore Sharjah, UAE and there are no income taxes due as no earnings or dividends were distributed or repatriated.
Undistributed earnings of the Company's foreign subsidiaries are considered to be indefinitely reinvested and, accordingly, no provision for U.S. federal income taxes has been provided thereon. Upon distribution of those earnings in the form of dividends or otherwise, the Company may be subject to both U.S. income taxes (subject to an adjustment for foreign tax credits) and withholding taxes payable to the foreign countries.
The Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries have not filed required foreign and U.S. tax returns due for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007. No material tax liability is anticipated however the Company will not be in compliance until such reporting is made. Management has begun discussions with qualified firms to identify and prepare delinquent tax returns for filing. Amounts due, if any, would not be material. Therefore, no accrual has been made for potential tax liabilities, penalties or interest.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company adopted SFAS 123(R) effective January 1, 2006, and is applying the retrospective method, whereby compensation cost associated with the unvested portion of awards granted after December 2004 will be recognized over the remaining vesting period. No options that were granted prior to December 2004 remain unvested at January 1, 2006. Under this method, prior periods are revised for comparative purposes.
In December 2007, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) 110 Share-Based Payment. SAB 110 amends and replaces Question 6 of Section D.2 of Topic 14, “Share-Based Payment,” of the Staff Accounting Bulletin series. Question 6 of Section D.2 of Topic 14 expresses the views of the staff regarding the use of the “simplified” method in developing an estimate of the expected term of “plain vanilla” share options and allows usage of the “simplified” method for share option grants prior to December 31, 2007. SAB 110 allows public companies which do not have historically sufficient experience to provide a reasonable estimate to continue use of the “simplified” method for estimating the expected term of “plain vanilla” share option grants after December 31, 2007. SAB 110 was effective January 1, 2008. The Company has used the “simplified” method to estimate the expected term for share option grants as it does not have enough historical experience to provide a reasonable estimate. The Company will continue to use the “simplified” method until it has enough historical experience to provide a reasonable estimate of expected term in accordance with SAB 110. The adoption of SAB 110 did not have a material impact on its consolidated balance sheets, statements of operations and cash flows.
Contractual Obligations
The Company has had no material changes to its contractual obligations as disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007.
We believe that we have sufficient working capital to meet our currently anticipated expenditure levels for the next 12 months. Total stockholder equity was $7,043,745 at March 31, 2008.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Not Applicable.
13
Item 4T. Disclosure Controls and Procedures
At the end of the period covered by this report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2008, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision of and with the participation of the Company's management, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operations of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a - 15(e) and Rule 15d - 15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based on that evaluation the CEO and the CFO have concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were not adequately designed and effective in ensuring that: (i) information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits to the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in applicable rules and forms and (ii) material information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow for accurate and timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
In management’s review of financial information required to be reported in the Company’s quarterly report for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and in the Company’s annual report for the year ended December 31, 2007, management determined that material weaknesses existed in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. In considering the intersection of the Company’s policies on disclosure controls and procedures and on internal control over financial reporting, the Company’s management determined that the material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting did affect the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. For this reason, the CEO and CFO have determined that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not adequate. However, as described in the following section “Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting”, the Company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, are taking actions to address the material weaknesses in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The Company's management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that its disclosure controls and procedures or internal controls and procedures will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
The following represents the Company’s management’s assessment of material weaknesses in the system of internal control over financial reporting.
1. | The Company does not maintain adequate core competencies in the areas of technical accounting and financial reporting within the accounting staff to supplement the Chief Financial Officer. As a result there is an inadequate level of review of critical accounting analyses and estimates and there is an inadequate segregation of duties. |
2. | The Company does not maintain an effective system of supervision and review of production quantities, conversions, oil in inventory and timing and quantity of lifts. Further, there are insufficient communications to insure the timely and accurate reporting of significant events. |
3. | The Company has not monitored and responded to critical contractual provisions of the Participation Agreement. Failure to do so has resulted in material errors in the areas of revenue recognition and impairment analyses. These failures have related primarily to the extent of drilling and completion overruns and certain ambiguities in the contractual provisions. |
4. | The Company should engage independent reservoir engineers to produce reserve reports. Critical assumptions used in computing reserves should be reviewed by operations personnel as well as the Chief Financial Officer. |
14
During the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company’s management implemented no changes to internal control over financial reporting.
The Company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, are working towards implementation of these and additional changes in internal control over financial reporting to address these material weaknesses. These changes include modernizing the Company’s accounts payable procedures, moving final oversight of the Company’s accounts to the Company’s principal office in Texas, hiring additional accounting staff with expertise in United States GAAP, and conducting spot audits on production at the Mubarek wells.
15
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
None.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes from the risk factors discussed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
None.
Item 5. Other Information |
None.
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 and Rule 15d-14(a), promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 and Rule 15d-14(a), promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended |
| | |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act | |
| | |
32.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act | |
| | | | |
16
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
SKY PETROLEUM, INC.
By: /s/ Karim Jobanputra
Karim Jobanputra
Interim Chief Executive Officer
(On behalf of the registrant and as Principal Executive Officer)
Date: May 15, 2008
By: /s/ Hilda Kouvelis
Hilda Kouvelis
Interim Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Date: May 15, 2008
17