UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2008
— OR —
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File Number 333-100240
Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
| | |
Delaware | | 75-2967830 |
(State of Organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| | |
1601 Bryan Street, Dallas, TX 75201 | | (214) 486-2000 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code) | | (Registrant’s Telephone Number) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ¨ Non-Accelerated filer x Smaller reporting company ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
As of May 12, 2008, all outstanding common membership interests in Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC (Oncor) were directly held by Oncor Electric Delivery Holdings Company LLC and indirectly held by Energy Future Holdings Corp.
Oncor meets the conditions set forth in General Instructions (H) (1) (a) and (b) of Form 10-Q and is therefore filing this report with the reduced disclosure format.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Oncor’s annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports are made available to the public, free of charge, on the Oncor website at http://www.oncor.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after they have been filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Oncor will provide copies of current reports not posted on the website upon request. The information on Oncor’s website shall not be deemed a part of, or incorporated by reference into, this report on Form 10-Q.
This Form 10-Q and other Securities and Exchange Commission filings of Oncor and its subsidiaries occasionally make references to Oncor when describing actions, rights or obligations of its subsidiary. These references reflect the fact that the subsidiary is consolidated with Oncor for financial reporting purposes. However, these references should not be interpreted to imply that Oncor is actually undertaking the action or has the rights or obligations of its subsidiary or that the subsidiary company is undertaking an action or has the rights or obligations of its parent company or of any other affiliate.
i
GLOSSARY
When the following terms and abbreviations appear in the text of this report, they have the meanings indicated below.
| | |
2007 Form 10-K | | Oncor’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 |
| |
Capgemini | | Capgemini Energy LP, a subsidiary of Cap Gemini North America Inc. that provides business support services to Oncor |
| |
EFC Holdings | | Refers to Energy Future Competitive Holdings Company, a subsidiary of EFH Corp. and the parent of TCEH. |
| |
EFH Corp. | | Refers to Energy Future Holdings Corp., a holding company, and/or its subsidiaries, depending on context. |
| |
EPA | | US Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
ERCOT | | Electric Reliability Council of Texas, the independent system operator and the regional coordinator of the various electricity systems within Texas |
| |
FASB | | Financial Accounting Standards Board, the designated organization in the private sector for establishing standards for financial accounting and reporting |
| |
FERC | | US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission |
| |
FIN | | Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation |
| |
Fitch | | Fitch Ratings, Ltd. (a credit rating agency) |
| |
GAAP | | generally accepted accounting principles |
| |
GWh | | gigawatt-hours |
| |
Intermediate Holding | | Refers to Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of EFH Corp. and the parent of Oncor Holdings. |
| |
LIBOR | | London Interbank Offered Rate. An interest rate at which banks can borrow funds, in marketable size, from other banks in the London interbank market. |
| |
Luminant | | Refers to wholly-owned subsidiaries of TCEH engaged in competitive market activities consisting of electricity generation, development and construction of new generation facilities, wholesale energy sales and purchases as well as commodity risk management and trading activities, all largely in Texas. |
| |
Merger | | The transaction referred to in “Merger Agreement” (defined immediately below) that was completed on October 10, 2007. |
| |
Merger Agreement | | Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated February 25, 2007, under which Texas Holdings agreed to acquire TXU Corp. (now EFH Corp.) |
| |
Moody’s | | Moody’s Investors Services, Inc. (a credit rating agency) |
| |
MW | | megawatts |
| |
Oncor | | Refers to Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Oncor Holdings, and/or its consolidated bankruptcy remote financing subsidiary, Oncor Electric Delivery Transition Bond Company LLC, depending on context. |
| |
Oncor Holdings | | Refers to Oncor Electric Delivery Holdings Company LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intermediate Holding and the parent of Oncor. |
ii
| | |
Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities | | Refers to Oncor Holdings and its direct and indirect subsidiaries. |
| |
OPEB | | other postretirement employee benefits |
| |
PUCT | | Public Utility Commission of Texas |
| |
PURA | | Texas Public Utility Regulatory Act |
| |
Purchase accounting | | The purchase method of accounting for a business combination as prescribed by SFAS 141 whereby the cost or “purchase price” of a business combination, including the amount paid for the equity and direct transaction costs are allocated to identifiable assets and liabilities (including intangible assets) based upon their fair values. The excess of the purchase price over the fair values of assets and liabilities is recorded as goodwill. |
| |
REP | | retail electric provider |
| |
S&P | | Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services, a division of the McGraw Hill Companies, Inc. (a credit rating agency) |
| |
SEC | | US Securities and Exchange Commission |
| |
SFAS | | Statement of Financial Accounting Standards issued by the FASB |
| |
SFAS 140 | | SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities, a replacement of FASB Statement No. 125” |
| |
SFAS 141 | | SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations” |
| |
Sponsor Group | | Collectively, the investment funds affiliated with Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P., TPG Capital, L.P. and GS Capital Partners, an affiliate of Goldman Sachs & Co. |
| |
TCEH | | Refers to Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Company LLC, a direct subsidiary of EFC Holdings and an indirect subsidiary of EFH Corp., and/or its subsidiaries, depending on context. |
| |
TCEQ | | Texas Commission on Environmental Quality |
| |
Texas Holdings | | Refers to Texas Energy Future Holdings Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership controlled by the Sponsor Group, which is the parent of EFH Corp. |
| |
Texas Holdings Group | | Refers to Texas Holdings and its direct and indirect subsidiaries other than the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities. |
| |
TXU Energy | | Refers to TXU Energy Retail Company LLC, a subsidiary of TCEH engaged in the retail sale of power to residential and business customers. TXU Energy is a REP in competitive areas of ERCOT. |
| |
US | | United States of America |
iii
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY COMPANY LLC
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME
(Unaudited)
(millions of dollars)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Successor | | | | Predecessor |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 | | | | Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 |
Operating revenues: | | | | | | | | |
Affiliated | | $ | 242 | | | | $ | 265 |
Nonaffiliated | | | 372 | | | | | 348 |
| | | | | | | | |
Total operating revenues | | | 614 | | | | | 613 |
| | | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | |
Operation and maintenance | | | 203 | | | | | 198 |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 120 | | | | | 119 |
Income taxes | | | 43 | | | | | 43 |
Taxes other than income | | | 97 | | | | | 96 |
| | | | | | | | |
Total operating expenses | | | 463 | | | | | 456 |
| | | | | | | | |
Operating income | | | 151 | | | | | 157 |
| | | |
Other income and deductions: | | | | | | | | |
Other income (Note 11) | | | 11 | | | | | 2 |
Other deductions (Note 11) | | | 8 | | | | | 10 |
Nonoperating income taxes | | | 5 | | | | | 3 |
| | | |
Interest income | | | 12 | | | | | 15 |
| | | |
Interest expense and related charges (Note 11) | | | 76 | | | | | 76 |
| | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 85 | | | | $ | 85 |
| | | | | | | | |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
1
ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY COMPANY LLC
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(millions of dollars)
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Successor | | | | | Predecessor | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 | | | | | Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 | |
Cash flows — operating activities: | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 85 | | | | | $ | 85 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 110 | | | | | | 119 | |
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits — net | | | 30 | | | | | | 26 | |
Other, net | | | 2 | | | | | | 1 | |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities | | | (102 | ) | | | | | (116 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Cash provided by operating activities | | | 125 | | | | | | 115 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Cash flows — financing activities: | | | | | | | | | | |
Issuance of long-term debt | | | — | | | | | | 800 | |
Retirements of long-term debt | | | (22 | ) | | | | | (21 | ) |
Increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings | | | 140 | | | | | | (605 | ) |
Dividend to parent | | | (57 | ) | | | | | (88 | ) |
Net increase in advances from parent | | | — | | | | | | 9 | |
Decrease in income tax-related note receivable from TCEH | | | 8 | | | | | | 8 | |
Debt premium, discount, financing and reacquisition expenses | | | (1 | ) | | | | | (8 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Cash provided by financing activities | | | 68 | | | | | | 95 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Cash flows — investing activities: | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital expenditures | | | (189 | ) | | | | | (187 | ) |
Costs to remove retired property | | | (8 | ) | | | | | (8 | ) |
Other | | | — | | | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Cash used in investing activities | | | (197 | ) | | | | | (195 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | | | (4 | ) | | | | | 15 | |
| | | |
Cash and cash equivalents — beginning balance | | | 22 | | | | | | 1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents — ending balance | | $ | 18 | | | | | $ | 16 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
2
ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY COMPANY LLC
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(millions of dollars)
| | | | | | |
| | Successor |
| | March 31, 2008 | | December 31, 2007 |
ASSETS | | | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 18 | | $ | 22 |
Restricted cash (Note 11) | | | 60 | | | 56 |
Trade accounts receivable from nonaffiliates — net (Note 4) | | | 220 | | | 208 |
Trade accounts and other receivables from affiliates | | | 178 | | | 180 |
Income taxes receivable from parent | | | 5 | | | 29 |
Materials and supplies inventories — at average cost | | | 55 | | | 51 |
Accumulated deferred income taxes | | | 45 | | | 45 |
Prepayments | | | 82 | | | 67 |
Other current assets | | | 6 | | | 3 |
| | | | | | |
Total current assets | | | 669 | | | 661 |
| | |
Investments and other property (Note 11) | | | 104 | | | 106 |
Property, plant and equipment — net (Note 11) | | | 8,143 | | | 8,069 |
Goodwill | | | 4,899 | | | 4,894 |
Note receivable due from TCEH (Note 10) | | | 281 | | | 289 |
Regulatory assets — net (Note 3) | | | 1,312 | | | 1,305 |
Other noncurrent assets | | | 97 | | | 110 |
| | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 15,505 | | $ | 15,434 |
| | | | | | |
| | |
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERSHIP INTEREST | | | | | | |
| | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | | |
Short-term borrowings (Note 5) | | $ | 1,420 | | $ | 1,280 |
Long-term debt due currently (Note 6) | | | 100 | | | 99 |
Trade accounts payable | | | 89 | | | 129 |
Accrued taxes other than income | | | 69 | | | 136 |
Accrued interest | | | 66 | | | 72 |
Other current liabilities | | | 80 | | | 99 |
| | | | | | |
Total current liabilities | | | 1,824 | | | 1,815 |
| | |
Accumulated deferred income taxes | | | 1,382 | | | 1,354 |
Investment tax credits | | | 46 | | | 47 |
Long-term debt, less amounts due currently (Note 6) | | | 3,680 | | | 3,702 |
Other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits | | | 927 | | | 898 |
| | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 7,859 | | | 7,816 |
| | |
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 7) | | | | | | |
| | |
Membership interest (Note 8) | | | 7,646 | | | 7,618 |
| | | | | | |
Total liabilities and membership interest | | $ | 15,505 | | $ | 15,434 |
| | | | | | |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
3
ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY COMPANY LLC
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. | SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND BUSINESS |
Description of Business
Oncor is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Oncor Holdings, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intermediate Holding, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of EFH Corp. Oncor is a regulated electricity transmission and distribution company principally engaged in providing delivery services to REPs that sell power in the north-central, eastern and western parts of Texas. A significant portion of Oncor’s revenues represent fees for delivery services provided to TCEH.
Oncor’s condensed consolidated financial statements include its wholly-owned, bankruptcy-remote financing subsidiary, Oncor Electric Delivery Transition Bond Company LLC. Oncor Electric Delivery Transition Bond Company LLC was organized for the limited purpose of issuing securitization (transition) bonds to recover generation-related regulatory asset stranded costs and other qualified costs.
With the closing of the Merger on October 10, 2007, EFH Corp. became a subsidiary of Texas Holdings, which is controlled by the Sponsor Group. In connection with the Merger, Oncor was converted from a Texas corporation to a Delaware limited liability company under the laws of the States of Texas and Delaware.
As part of the Merger, EFH Corp. and Oncor implemented certain structural and operational “ring-fencing” measures based on commitments made by Texas Holdings and Oncor to the PUCT that are intended to further separate Oncor from Texas Holdings and its other subsidiaries. The assets and liabilities of the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities are separate and distinct from those of the Texas Holdings Group, including TXU Energy and Luminant, and none of the assets of the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities are available to satisfy the debt or other obligations of any member of the Texas Holdings Group. These measures also serve to mitigate Oncor’s credit exposure to those entities. Moreover, the cash flows of the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities and their results of operations are separate from those of the Texas Holdings Group. Additional measures to enhance Oncor’s separateness are discussed in the 2007 Form 10-K.
Oncor is managed as an integrated business; consequently, there are no separate reportable business segments.
Basis of Presentation
The condensed consolidated financial statements of Oncor have been prepared in accordance with US GAAP and on the same basis as the audited financial statements included in its 2007 Form 10-K. All adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations and financial position have been included therein. All intercompany items and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with US GAAP have been omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC. Because the condensed consolidated interim financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by US GAAP, they should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and related notes included in the 2007 Form 10-K. The results of operations for an interim period may not give a true indication of results for a full year. All dollar amounts in the financial statements and tables in the notes are stated in millions of US dollars unless otherwise indicated.
4
The accompanying condensed statements of consolidated income and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007 are presented as the “Successor” and the “Predecessor,” respectively, and relate to the period succeeding the Merger and the period preceding the Merger, respectively. The consolidated financial statements of the Successor reflect the application of purchase accounting in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 141.
Use of Estimates
Preparation of Oncor’s financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the reporting of assets and liabilities at the balance sheet dates and the reported amounts of revenue and expense, including fair value adjustments. In the event estimates and/or assumptions prove to be different from actual amounts, adjustments are made in subsequent periods to reflect more current information. No material adjustments, other than those disclosed elsewhere herein, were made to previous estimates or assumptions during the current year.
2. | FINANCIAL STATEMENT EFFECTS OF THE MERGER |
EFH Corp. accounted for the Merger under purchase accounting in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 141, whereby the total purchase price of the transaction was allocated to EFH Corp.’s identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values as of October 10, 2007. As a result of cost-based regulatory rate-setting processes, the book value of the majority of Oncor’s assets and liabilities effectively represents fair value, and no adjustments to the carrying value of those regulated assets or liabilities were recorded. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired was recorded as goodwill. The purchase price amount assigned to Oncor was based on the relative enterprise value of the business on the closing date of the Merger and resulted in an excess of purchase price over fair value of assets and liabilities of $4.9 billion, which was recorded as goodwill.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed (billions of dollars):
| | | | | |
Purchase price assigned to Oncor | | | | $ | 7.6 |
| | |
Property, plant and equipment | | 7.9 | | | |
Regulatory assets - net | | 1.3 | | | |
Other assets | | 1.3 | | | |
| | | | | |
Total assets acquired | | 10.5 | | | |
| | |
Short-term borrowings and long-term debt | | 5.1 | | | |
Deferred tax liabilities | | 1.4 | | | |
Other liabilities | | 1.3 | | | |
| | | | | |
Total liabilities assumed | | 7.8 | | | |
Net identifiable assets acquired | | | | | 2.7 |
| | | | | |
Goodwill | | | | $ | 4.9 |
| | | | | |
The purchase price allocation at March 31, 2008 is substantially complete. Based upon analysis completed to date, EFH Corp. and Oncor management do not expect any material changes in fair value estimates recorded; however, additional analysis with respect to the value of certain assets and contractual arrangements could result in a change in the amount of goodwill recorded by Oncor.
As part of purchase accounting, the carrying value of certain generation-related regulatory assets securitized by transition bonds, which have been reviewed and approved by the PUCT for recovery but without earning a rate of return, was reduced by $213 million. Oncor will accrete this amount to other income over the recovery period remaining as of the closing date of the Merger (approximately nine years). The related securitization (transition) bonds were also fair valued and the resulting discount of $12 million will be amortized to interest expense over the life of the bonds remaining as of the closing date of the Merger (approximately nine years).
5
3. | REGULATORY ASSETS AND LIABILITIES |
| | | | | | |
| | Successor |
| | March 31, 2008 | | December 31, 2007 |
Regulatory assets | | | | | | |
Generation-related regulatory assets securitized by transition bonds | | $ | 943 | | $ | 967 |
Employee retirement costs | | | 265 | | | 265 |
Storm-related service recovery (self insurance reserve) costs | | | 148 | | | 149 |
Securities reacquisition costs | | | 103 | | | 105 |
Recoverable deferred income taxes — net | | | 82 | | | 84 |
Employee severance costs | | | 20 | | | 20 |
Nuclear decommissioning cost under-recovery | | | 18 | | | — |
Other | | | 4 | | | 3 |
| | | | | | |
Total regulatory assets | | | 1,583 | | | 1,593 |
| | | | | | |
Regulatory liabilities | | | | | | |
Credit due REPs under PUCT stipulation | | | 72 | | | 72 |
Committed spending for demand side management initiatives | | | 100 | | | 100 |
Investment tax credit and protected excess deferred taxes | | | 53 | | | 55 |
Over-collection of securitization (transition) bond revenues | | | 32 | | | 34 |
Nuclear decommissioning cost over-recovery | | | — | | | 13 |
Other regulatory liabilities | | | 14 | | | 14 |
| | | | | | |
Total regulatory liabilities | | | 271 | | | 288 |
| | | | | | |
Net regulatory assets | | $ | 1,312 | | $ | 1,305 |
| | | | | | |
Regulatory assets that have been reviewed and approved by the PUCT and are not earning a return totaled $972 million and $997 million at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, including the generation-related regulatory assets securitized by transition bonds that have a remaining recovery period of approximately eight years. As part of purchase accounting, the carrying value of the generation-related regulatory assets was reduced by $213 million, and this amount is being accreted to other income over the recovery period remaining as of the closing date of the Merger (approximately nine years).
Other regulatory assets totaling $465 million have not been reviewed by the PUCT but are deemed by management to be probable of recovery.
See Note 10 for additional information regarding nuclear decommissioning cost recovery.
6
4. | TRADE ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AND SALE OF RECEIVABLES PROGRAM |
Trade Accounts Receivable
| | | | | | | | |
| | Successor | |
| | March 31, 2008 | | | December 31, 2007 | |
Gross trade accounts receivable | | $ | 367 | | | $ | 361 | |
Trade accounts receivable from TCEH | | | (140 | ) | | | (147 | ) |
Allowance for uncollectible accounts | | | (7 | ) | | | (6 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Trade accounts receivable from nonaffiliates — net | | $ | 220 | | | $ | 208 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Gross trade accounts receivable at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 included unbilled revenues of $124 million and $137 million, respectively.
Sale of Receivables
Oncor participated in an accounts receivable securitization program established by EFH Corp. for certain of its subsidiaries, the activity under which was accounted for as a sale of accounts receivable in accordance with SFAS 140. Under the program, Oncor sold trade accounts receivable to TXU Receivables Company, a consolidated wholly-owned bankruptcy-remote direct subsidiary of EFH Corp., which sold undivided interests in those purchased accounts receivable for cash to special purpose entities established by financial institutions (the funding entities). In connection with the Merger, the accounts receivable securitization program was amended, and Oncor is no longer a participant in the program.
Prior to the Merger, new trade receivables under the program generated by Oncor were continuously purchased by TXU Receivables Company with the proceeds from collections of receivables previously purchased. Changes in the amount of funding under the program, through changes in the amount of undivided interests sold by TXU Receivables Company, reflected seasonal variations in the level of accounts receivable, changes in collection trends as well as other factors such as changes in delivery fees and volumes. TXU Receivables Company issued subordinated notes payable to Oncor for the difference between the face amount of the uncollected accounts receivable purchased, less a discount, and cash paid to Oncor that was funded by the sale of the undivided interests.
The discount from face amount on the purchase of receivables principally funded program fees paid by TXU Receivables Company to the funding entities. The discount also funded a servicing fee paid by TXU Receivables Company to EFH Corporate Services Company, a direct subsidiary of EFH Corp., but the amounts were immaterial. The program fees, referred to as losses on sale of the receivables under SFAS 140, consisted primarily of interest costs on the underlying financing and totaled $2 million and averaged 5.7% (on an annualized basis) of the funding under the program for the three month period ending March 31, 2007. These fees represented essentially all of the net incremental costs of the program to Oncor and were reported in operation and maintenance expenses.
As of March 31, 2007, funding under the program totaled $103 million and the balance of the subordinated notes issued to Oncor, which was reported in trade accounts receivable, totaled $72 million. Funding increases or decreases under the program were reflected as operating cash flow activity in the statement of cash flows.
7
Activities of TXU Receivables Company related to Oncor were as follows:
| | | | |
| | Predecessor | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 | |
Cash collections on accounts receivable | | $ | 380 | |
Face amount of new receivables purchased | | | (417 | ) |
Discount from face amount of purchased receivables | | | 2 | |
Program fees paid | | | (2 | ) |
Increase in subordinated notes payable | | | 20 | |
| | | | |
Operating cash flows provided to Oncor under the program | | $ | (17 | ) |
| | | | |
At March 31, 2008, Oncor had a $2.0 billion credit facility to be used for working capital and general corporate purposes, including issuances of commercial paper and letters of credit. Oncor may request increases in the commitments under the facility in any amount up to $500 million, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. This facility is a revolving credit facility, which means that amounts borrowed under the facility, once repaid, can be reborrowed by Oncor from time to time until October 10, 2013. In May 2008, Oncor secured this credit facility with a first priority lien on certain of its transmission and distribution assets. Oncor also secured all of its existing long-term debt securities (excluding the transition bonds) with the same lien in accordance with the terms of those securities. The lien may be terminated at Oncor’s option upon the termination of Oncor’s current credit facility.
At March 31, 2008, Oncor had outstanding short-term borrowings under its credit facility totaling $1.420 billion with an interest rate of 3.46% at the end of the period. At December 31, 2007, Oncor had outstanding short-term borrowings under its credit facility totaling $1.280 billion with an interest rate of 5.70% at the end of the period. The increased borrowings were driven by funding of ongoing capital investments. Availability under this facility as of March 31, 2008 was $580 million.
Borrowings bear interest at per annum rates equal to, at Oncor’s option, (i) adjusted LIBOR plus a spread of 0.275% to 0.800% (depending on the rating assigned to Oncor’s senior secured debt) or (ii) a base rate (the higher of (1) the prime rate of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and (2) the federal funds effective rate plus 0.50%) for borrowings. Under option (i) and based on Oncor’s current ratings, its LIBOR-based borrowings, which apply to all outstanding borrowings at March 31, 2008, bear interest at LIBOR plus 0.575%.
A facility fee is payable at a rate per annum equal to 0.100% to 0.200% (depending on the rating assigned to Oncor’s senior secured debt) of the commitments under the facility. Based on Oncor’s current ratings, its facility fee is 0.175%. A utilization fee is payable on the average daily amount of borrowings in excess of 50% of the commitments under the facility at a rate per annum equal to 0.125% per annum.
The facility contains customary covenants for facilities of this type, restricting, subject to certain exceptions, Oncor and its subsidiaries from, among other things:
| • | | incurring additional liens; |
| • | | entering into mergers and consolidations; |
| • | | making acquisitions and investments in subsidiaries. |
In addition, the facility requires that Oncor maintain a consolidated senior debt to capitalization ratio of no greater than 0.65 to 1.00 and observe certain customary reporting requirements and other affirmative covenants.
The facility contains certain customary events of default for facilities of this type, the occurrence of which would allow the lenders to accelerate all outstanding loans and terminate their commitments.
8
At March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, long-term debt of Oncor consisted of the following:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Successor | |
| | March 31, 2008 | | | December 31, 2007 | |
Oncor | | | | | | | | |
6.375% Fixed Senior Notes due May 1, 2012 | | $ | 700 | | | $ | 700 | |
7.000% Fixed Senior Notes due May 1, 2032 | | | 500 | | | | 500 | |
6.375% Fixed Senior Notes due January 15, 2015 | | | 500 | | | | 500 | |
7.250% Fixed Senior Notes due January 15, 2033 | | | 350 | | | | 350 | |
7.000% Fixed Debentures due September 1, 2022 | | | 800 | | | | 800 | |
Unamortized discount | | | (15 | ) | | | (15 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Oncor | | | 2,835 | | | | 2,835 | |
| | |
Oncor Electric Delivery Transition Bond Company LLC (a) | | | | | | | | |
4.030% Fixed Series 2003 Bonds due in semiannual installments through February 15, 2010 | | | 71 | | | | 93 | |
4.950% Fixed Series 2003 Bonds due in semiannual installments through February 15, 2013 | | | 130 | | | | 130 | |
5.420% Fixed Series 2003 Bonds due in semiannual installments through August 15, 2015 | | | 145 | | | | 145 | |
3.520% Fixed Series 2004 Bonds due in semiannual installments through November 15, 2009 | | | 99 | | | | 99 | |
4.810% Fixed Series 2004 Bonds due in semiannual installments through November 15, 2012 | | | 221 | | | | 221 | |
5.290% Fixed Series 2004 Bonds due in semiannual installments through May 15, 2016 | | | 290 | | | | 290 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Oncor Electric Delivery Transition Bond Company LLC | | | 956 | | | | 978 | |
| | |
Unamortized fair value discount related to transition bonds (b) | | | (11 | ) | | | (12 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Total consolidated | | | 3,780 | | | | 3,801 | |
Less amount due currently | | | (100 | ) | | | (99 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Total long-term debt | | $ | 3,680 | | | $ | 3,702 | |
| | | | | | | | |
(a) | These bonds are nonrecourse to Oncor and were issued to securitize a regulatory asset. |
(b) | The transition bonds, which secured regulatory assets not earning a return, were fair valued as of October 10, 2007 as a result of purchase accounting. |
Debt Retirements in 2008
Retirements of long-term debt in 2008 totaled $22 million and represent transition bond principal payments at scheduled maturity dates.
7. | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
Legal Proceedings
Oncor is involved in various legal and administrative proceedings in the normal course of business the ultimate resolution of which, in the opinion of management, should not have a material effect upon its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Guarantees
Oncor has entered into contracts that contain guarantees to outside parties that could require performance or payment under certain conditions.
Oncor is the lessee under various operating leases that obligate it to guarantee the residual values of the leased assets. At March 31, 2008, both the aggregate maximum amount of residual values guaranteed and the estimated residual recoveries totaled approximately $17 million. These leased assets consist primarily of vehicles used in distribution activities. The average life of the lease portfolio is approximately two years.
9
Cash Distributions to Parent
In March 2008, Oncor paid a cash distribution of $57 million to Oncor Holdings. The distribution was declared by the board of directors in February 2008.
Membership Interest
The following table presents the changes to membership interest during the three months ended March 31, 2008:
| | | | |
| | Successor | |
| | Membership Interest | |
Balance at December 31, 2007 | | $ | 7,618 | |
Net income | | | 85 | |
Distributions paid to parent | | | (57 | ) |
| | | | |
Balance at March 31, 2008 | | $ | 7,646 | |
| | | | |
9. | PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS COSTS |
Oncor is a participating employer in the EFH Retirement Plan, a defined benefit pension plan sponsored by EFH Corp. Oncor also participates with EFH Corp. and certain other affiliated subsidiaries of EFH Corp. to offer certain health care and life insurance benefits to eligible employees and their eligible dependents upon the retirement of such employees. The net allocated pension and other postretirement employee benefits (OPEB) costs applicable to Oncor for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 are comprised of the following:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Successor | | | | Predecessor |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 | | | | Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 |
Amounts recognized as expense | | $ | 5 | | | | $ | 4 |
Amounts deferred principally as a regulatory asset or property | | | 11 | | | | | 12 |
| | | | | | | | |
Total pension and OPEB costs | | $ | 16 | | | | $ | 16 |
| | | | | | | | |
The discount rate reflected in net pension and OPEB costs in 2008 is 6.55%. The expected rate of return on plan assets reflected in the 2008 cost amounts is 8.25% for the pension plan and 7.90% for the OPEB plan.
For the full year 2008, Oncor expects to make required contributions totaling $46 million to EFH Corp.’s pension plan and to provide an estimated $38 million in funding for EFH Corp.’s OPEB plan. Oncor provided contributions of $7 million and $8 million to the pension and OPEB plans, respectively, in the three months ended March 31, 2008.
10
10. | RELATED–PARTY TRANSACTIONS |
The following represent significant related-party transactions of Oncor:
| • | | Oncor records revenue from TCEH, principally for electricity delivery fees, which totaled $242 million and $265 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. |
| • | | Oncor records interest income from TCEH with respect to Oncor’s generation-related regulatory assets, which have been securitized through the issuance of transition bonds by Oncor’s bankruptcy-remote financing subsidiary. The interest income serves to offset Oncor’s interest expense on the transition bonds. This interest income totaled $12 million and $13 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. |
| • | | Incremental accrued income taxes incurred by Oncor as a result of delivery fee surcharges to its customers related to transition bonds are reimbursed by TCEH. Oncor’s financial statements reflect a note receivable from TCEH of $315 million ($34 million reported as current in trade accounts and other receivables from affiliates) at March 31, 2008 and $323 million ($34 million reported as current in trade accounts and other receivables from affiliates) at December 31, 2007 related to these income taxes. |
| • | | An EFH Corp. subsidiary charges Oncor for financial and certain other administrative services at cost. These costs, which are reported in operation and maintenance expenses, totaled $5 million and $6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. |
| • | | Under Texas regulatory provisions, the trust fund for decommissioning the Comanche Peak nuclear generation facility (reported on TCEH’s balance sheet) is funded by a delivery fee surcharge collected from REPs by Oncor and remitted to TCEH. These trust fund assets are established with the intent to be sufficient to fund the estimated decommissioning liability (also reported on TCEH’s balance sheet). Income and expenses associated with the trust fund and the decommissioning liability recorded by TCEH are offset by a net change in the Oncor and TCEH intercompany receivable/payable, which in turn results in a change in Oncor’s reported net regulatory asset/liability. The regulatory asset totaled $18 million at March 31, 2008 and represents the excess of the decommissioning liability over the trust fund balance. The regulatory liability totaled $13 million at December 31, 2007 and represents the excess of the trust fund balance over the estimated decommissioning liability. |
| • | | Oncor has a 19.5% limited partnership interest, with a carrying value of $9 million and $10 million at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, in an EFH Corp. subsidiary holding Capgemini-related assets. Equity losses related to this interest totaled $1 million for both the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007. These losses primarily represent amortization of software assets held by the subsidiary. |
| • | | EFH Corp. files a consolidated federal income tax return and allocates income tax liabilities to its subsidiaries. As a result, Oncor had a federal income tax receivable from EFH Corp. of $5 million and $29 million at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. |
| • | | As of March 31, 2008, Oncor held collateral of $15 million from TCEH related to interconnection agreements for three generation units being developed by Luminant. |
| • | | Certain transmission and distribution utilities in Texas have tariffs in place to assure adequate credit worthiness of any REP to support the REP’s obligation to collect securitization bond-related (transition) charges on behalf of the utility. Under these tariffs, as a result of TCEH’s credit rating being below investment grade, TCEH is required to post collateral support in an amount equal to estimated transition charges over specified time periods. Accordingly, TCEH has posted letters of credit in the amount of $14 million for the benefit of Oncor. |
11
| • | | At the closing of the Merger, Oncor entered into a $2 billion revolving credit facility with a syndicate of financial institutions and other lenders. The syndicate includes affiliates of GS Capital Partners. Affiliates of GS Capital Partners have from time to time engaged in commercial banking transactions with Oncor in the normal course of business. |
See Notes 8 and 9 for information regarding distributions to Oncor Holdings and the allocation of EFH Corp.’s pension and OPEB costs, respectively.
11. | SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
Other Income and Deductions —
| | | | | | | | |
| | Successor | | | | Predecessor |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 | | | | Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 |
Other income: | | | | | | | | |
Net gain on sale of other properties and investments | | $ | — | | | | $ | 2 |
Accretion of adjustment (discount) to regulatory assets due to purchase accounting (see Note 3) | | | 11 | | | | | — |
| | | | | | | | |
Total other income | | $ | 11 | | | | $ | 2 |
| | | | | | | | |
Other deductions: | | | | | | | | |
Charges related to 2006 cities rate settlement | | | 6 | | | | | 6 |
Expenses related to canceled InfrastruX Energy Services joint venture (a) | | | — | | | | | 1 |
Equity losses in an unconsolidated affiliate (Note 10) | | | 1 | | | | | 1 |
Other | | | 1 | | | | | 2 |
| | | | | | | | |
Total other deductions | | $ | 8 | | | | $ | 10 |
| | | | | | | | |
(a) | Consists of previously deferred costs arising from operational activities to transition to the joint venture arrangement, which was canceled in connection with the Merger. |
Interest Expense and Related Charges —
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Successor | | | | | Predecessor | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 | | | | | Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 | |
Interest | | $ | 75 | | | | | $ | 76 | |
Amortization of debt fair value discount due to purchase accounting | | | 1 | | | | | | — | |
Amortization of other debt discounts and debt issuance costs | | | 1 | | | | | | 1 | |
Allowance for funds used during construction – capitalized interest portion | | | (1 | ) | | | | | (1 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total interest expense and related charges | | $ | 76 | | | | | $ | 76 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
12
Investments and Other Property —
| | | | | | |
| | Successor |
| | March 31, 2008 | | December 31, 2007 |
Assets related to employee benefit plans, including employee savings programs, net of distributions | | $ | 76 | | $ | 77 |
Restricted cash | | | 17 | | | 17 |
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates | | | 9 | | | 10 |
Land | | | 2 | | | 2 |
| | | | | | |
Total investments and other property | | $ | 104 | | $ | 106 |
| | | | | | |
Restricted Cash — All restricted cash amounts reported on the balance sheet relate to the securitization (transition) bonds.
Property, Plant and Equipment — At March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, property, plant and equipment of $8.1 billion and $8.1 billion, respectively, is stated net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $3.9 billion and $3.9 billion, respectively.
Intangible Assets— Intangible assets other than goodwill are comprised of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Successor |
| | As of March 31, 2008 | | As of December 31, 2007 |
| | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net | | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net |
Intangible assets subject to amortization included in property, plant and equipment: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Land easements | | $ | 179 | | $ | 67 | | $ | 112 | | $ | 179 | | $ | 67 | | $ | 112 |
Capitalized software | | | 122 | | | 67 | | | 55 | | | 122 | | | 63 | | | 59 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 301 | | $ | 134 | | $ | 167 | | $ | 301 | | $ | 130 | | $ | 171 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Aggregate Oncor amortization expense for intangible assets totaled $4 million and $3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. At March 31, 2008, the weighted average remaining useful lives of capitalized land easements and software were 69 years and 11 years, respectively. The estimated aggregate amortization expense for each of the five succeeding fiscal years from December 31, 2007 is as follows:
| | | |
Year | | Amortization Expense |
2008 | | $ | 18 |
2009 | | | 17 |
2010 | | | 13 |
2011 | | | 9 |
2012 | | | 7 |
At March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, goodwill of $4.9 billion was reported on the balance sheet.
13
Supplemental Cash Flow Information—
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Successor | | | | | Predecessor |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 | | | | | Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 |
Cash payments: | | | | | | | | | |
Interest (net of amounts capitalized) | | $ | 81 | | | | | $ | 80 |
Income taxes | | | (7 | ) | | | | | 32 |
Noncash investing and financing activities: | | | | | | | | | |
Noncash construction expenditures (a) | | | 35 | | | | | | 32 |
(a) | Represents end of period accruals. |
14
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Member of Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC:
We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC and subsidiary (the “Company”) as of March 31, 2008, and the related condensed statements of consolidated income and cash flows for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2008 and 2007. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.
We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to such condensed consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of December 31, 2007, and the related statements of consolidated income, comprehensive income, cash flows, membership interest and shareholder’s equity for the period from October 11, 2007 through December 31, 2007 (successor) and the period from January 1, 2007 through October 10, 2007 (predecessor) (not presented herein); and in our report dated March 31, 2008, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2007 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
|
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP |
|
Dallas, Texas |
May 15, 2008 |
15
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
BUSINESS
Oncor is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Oncor Holdings, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intermediate Holding, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of EFH Corp. Oncor is a regulated electricity transmission and distribution company principally engaged in providing delivery services to REPs that sell power in the north-central, eastern and western parts of Texas. A significant portion of Oncor’s revenues represents fees for delivery services provided to TCEH. Distribution revenues from TCEH represented 39% and 43% of Oncor’s total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Oncor’s condensed consolidated financial statements include its wholly-owned, bankruptcy-remote financing subsidiary, Oncor Electric Delivery Transition Bond Company LLC. Oncor Electric Delivery Transition Bond Company LLC was organized for the limited purpose of issuing securitization (transition) bonds to recover generation-related regulatory asset stranded costs and other qualified costs.
With the closing of the Merger on October 10, 2007, EFH Corp. became a subsidiary of Texas Holdings, which is controlled by the Sponsor Group. In connection with the Merger, Oncor was converted from a Texas corporation to a Delaware limited liability company.
As part of the Merger, EFH Corp. and Oncor implemented certain structural and operational “ring-fencing” measures based on commitments made by Texas Holdings and Oncor to the PUCT that are intended to further separate Oncor from Texas Holdings and its other subsidiaries. The assets and liabilities of the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities are separate and distinct from those of the Texas Holdings Group, including TXU Energy and Luminant, and none of the assets of the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities are available to satisfy the debt or other obligations of any member of the Texas Holdings Group. These measures also serve to mitigate Oncor’s credit exposure to those entities. Moreover, the cash flows of the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities and their results of operations are separate from those of the Texas Holdings Group. Additional measures to enhance Oncor’s separateness are discussed in the 2007 Form 10-K.
16
SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS
Sale of Minority Stake
EFH Corp. currently intends to sell a 20% minority stake in Oncor to further enhance Oncor’s separation from the Texas Holdings Group. The purchaser of the minority stake will not be affiliated with any member of the Sponsor Group, Texas Holdings or EFH Corp. EFH Corp. is currently in discussions regarding the sale with certain interested parties.
Technology Initiatives
Oncor continues to invest in technology initiatives that include development of a modernized grid through the replacement of existing meters with advanced digital metering equipment and development of advanced digital communication, data management, real-time monitoring and outage detection capabilities. This modernized grid is expected to produce electricity service reliability improvements and provide the potential for additional products and services from REPs that will enable businesses and consumers to better manage their electricity usage and costs.
In May 2008, Oncor and CURRENT Communications of Texas, LP (“Current”) agreed to the terms of Oncor’s purchase of Current’s existing broadband over powerline (BPL) based “Smart Grid” network in Oncor’s service territory as well as additional equipment for $90 million. This network includes BPL equipment and technology as well as fiber optics, embedded sensing and software analytics that are intended to enable Oncor to better monitor its electricity distribution network and facilitate automated meter reading of up to one-sixth of Oncor’s service territory. In connection with the purchase agreement, Oncor also agreed to purchase software licenses and maintenance and operation services from an affiliate of Current over a three-year period for approximately $35 million. In addition, Oncor may purchase additional equipment and utilize additional services from Current that would allow Oncor to expand the BPL network to up to one-half of its service territory. Oncor expects to close the transaction later in May 2008.
Matters with the PUCT
See discussion below under “Regulation and Rates”.
17
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Oncor is managed as an integrated business; therefore, there are no reportable business segments.
The accompanying condensed statements of consolidated income and cash flows are presented for two periods: three months ended March 31, 2008 (Successor) and three months ended March 31, 2007 (Predecessor), which relate to periods after and before the Merger, respectively. While the results of operations of the Predecessor and Successor are not comparable due to the change in basis resulting from the application of purchase accounting for the Merger, the effects of purchase accounting on the results of the Successor are discussed in the comparison of results for the 2008 and 2007 periods.
All dollar amounts in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (including the tables) are stated in millions of US dollars unless otherwise indicated.
As discussed in the 2007 Form 10-K, Oncor’s results are being impacted by the effects of the 2006 cities rate settlement. Incremental expenses of approximately $70 million are being recognized almost entirely over the period from May 2006 through June 2008, of which $9 million and $8 million has been recognized in the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Operating Data
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Successor | | | | Predecessor | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 | | | | Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 | | % Change | |
Operating statistics – volumes: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Electric energy delivered (GWh) | | | 25,040 | | | | | 24,994 | | 0.2 | |
| | | | |
Reliability statistics (a): | | | | | | | | | | | |
System Average Interruption Duration Index (SAIDI) (nonstorm) | | | 85.15 | | | | | 74.70 | | 14.0 | |
System Average Interruption Frequency Index (SAIFI) (nonstorm) | | | 1.19 | | | | | 1.11 | | 7.2 | |
Customer Average Interruption Duration Index (CAIDI) (nonstorm) | | | 71.53 | | | | | 67.37 | | 6.2 | |
| | | | |
Electricity points of delivery (end of period and in thousands): | | | | | | | | | | | |
Electricity distribution points of delivery (based on number of meters) | | | 3,101 | | | | | 3,067 | | 1.1 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Successor | | | | Predecessor | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 | | | | Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 | | % Change | |
Operating Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Electricity distribution revenues (b): | | | | | | | | | | | |
Affiliated (TCEH) | | $ | 242 | | | | $ | 264 | | (8.3 | ) |
Nonaffiliated | | | 297 | | | | | 280 | | 6.1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Total distribution revenues | | | 539 | | | | | 544 | | (0.9 | ) |
Third-party transmission revenues | | | 66 | | | | | 61 | | 8.2 | |
Other miscellaneous revenues | | | 9 | | | | | 8 | | 12.5 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Total operating revenues | | $ | 614 | | | | $ | 613 | | 0.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
(a) | SAIDI is the average number of minutes electric service is interrupted per consumer in a year. SAIFI is the average number of electric service interruptions per consumer in a year. CAIDI is the average duration in minutes per electric service interruption in a year. The statistics presented are based on the preceding twelve months’ data. |
(b) | Includes transition charge revenue associated with the issuance of securitization bonds totaling $34 million and $37 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Also includes disconnect/reconnect fees and other discretionary revenues for services requested by REPs. |
18
Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2007
Operating revenues increased $1 million, or less than 1%, to $614 million in 2008. The revenue increase reflected:
| • | | $7 million from increased distribution tariffs to recover transmission costs; |
| • | | $6 million in higher transmission revenues primarily due to rate increases approved in 2007 to recover ongoing investment in the transmission system, and |
| • | | an estimated $5 million impact of growth in points of delivery, |
partially offset by:
| • | | an estimated $15 million effect of lower average consumption due in part to warmer than normal winter weather in 2008 and cooler than normal winter weather in 2007, and |
| • | | $3 million in lower charges to REPs related to securitization bonds (offset by lower amortization of the related regulatory asset). |
Operation and maintenance expense increased $5 million, or 3%, to $203 million in 2008. The increase reflected:
| • | | $3 million in increased labor and benefits costs for restoration of service as a result of weather events and more stringent service requirements; |
| • | | $3 million in higher professional fees; |
| • | | $2 million in higher labor-related costs due to equipment installation activities, and |
| • | | $2 million in higher vegetation management expenses, |
partially offset by:
| • | | $2 million in lower incentive compensation expense; |
| • | | $1 million in lower fees due to Oncor’s exit from the sale of accounts receivable program, and |
| • | | $1 million in lower shared services costs allocated by EFH Corp. |
Depreciation and amortization increased $1 million, or less than 1%, to $120 million in 2008. The increase reflected $4 million in depreciation due to ongoing investments in property, plant and equipment, partially offset by $3 million in lower amortization of the regulatory assets associated with the securitization bonds (offset in revenues).
Taxes other than income increased $1 million, or 1%, to $97 million in 2008. An increase in local franchise fees of $4 million was partially offset by a $3 million decrease in state franchise taxes. Local franchise fees resulting from the 2006 cities rate settlement totaled $2 million for both the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007.
Other income totaled $11 million in 2008 and $2 million in 2007. The 2008 amount represents accretion of the fair value adjustment to certain regulatory assets due to purchase accounting as discussed in Note 2 to Financial Statements. Other deductions totaled $8 million and $10 million in 2008 and 2007, respectively. These amounts included costs associated with the 2006 cities rate settlement totaling $6 million in both the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007. See Note 11 to Financial Statements for additional detail.
Income tax expense totaled $48 million in 2008 (including $43 million related to operating income and $5 million related to nonoperating income) compared to $46 million in 2007. The effective income tax rate was 36.1% in 2008 and 35.1% in 2007. The increased rate is primarily driven by higher Texas state taxes and higher interest accrued related to uncertain tax positions.
Interest income decreased $3 million, or 20%, to $12 million in 2008. The decrease reflects $2 million in lower salary deferral trust earnings and a $1 million decrease in reimbursement of transition bond interest from TCEH.
19
Interest expense totaled $76 million in both 2008 and 2007. Interest expense in 2008 reflected an increase of $4 million due to higher average short-term borrowings, reflecting the ongoing capital investment in the business, offset by a decrease of $4 million due to lower average interest rates driven by increased short-term borrowings and reduced long-term debt. The average interest rate effect is net of a $1 million increase due to the amortization of the fair value discount related to transition bonds that was recorded due to purchase accounting.
Net income totaled $85 million in both 2008 and 2007.
20
FINANCIAL CONDITION
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash Flows —Cash provided by operating activities totaled $125 million and $115 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The major factors driving the $10 million increase included a $39 million favorable change in income tax payments to EFH Corp., due primarily to timing of federal income tax payments, partially offset by $17 million in cash provided in 2007 from the sale of accounts receivable program, which Oncor exited effective with the Merger.
Cash provided by financing activities totaled $68 million in 2008 compared to $95 million in 2007. The activity reflected:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Successor | | | | | Predecessor | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 | | | | | Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 | |
Net issuances of borrowings (including predecessor advances from parent) | | $ | 117 | | | | | $ | 175 | |
Distributions to parent | | | (57 | ) | | | | | (88 | ) |
Payments received related to TCEH note receivable | | | 8 | | | | | | 8 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Cash provided by financing activities | | $ | 68 | | | | | $ | 95 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Investing activities, which consisted primarily of capital expenditures, totaled $197 million in 2008 and $195 million in 2007. The activity reflected: | |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Successor | | | | | Predecessor | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 | | | | | Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 | |
Capital expenditures | | $ | (189 | ) | | | | $ | (187 | ) |
Restricted cash | | | (4 | ) | | | | | (5 | ) |
Costs to remove retired property | | | (8 | ) | | | | | (8 | ) |
Other | | | 4 | | | | | | 5 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Cash used in investing activities | | $ | (197 | ) | | | | $ | (195 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization expense reported in the condensed statement of consolidated cash flows is less than the amount reported in the condensed statement of consolidated income by $10 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008. The difference represents the $11 million accretion of the adjustment (discount) to regulatory assets, net of the $1 million amortization of debt fair value discount, both due to purchase accounting and reported in other income and interest expense and related charges, respectively, in the condensed statement of consolidated income.
Long-Term Debt Activity — Retirements for the three months ended March 31, 2008 totaled $22 million of scheduled transition bond principal payments.
21
Credit Facilities/Short-term Borrowings — At April 30, 2008, Oncor had a $2.0 billion revolving credit facility, under which borrowings are available on a revolving basis through October 10, 2013. Borrowing capacity available under this credit facility totaled $580 million and $585 million at March 31, 2008 and April 30, 2008, respectively. Availability decreased $140 million from year-end 2007 to March 31, 2008 due to funding of capital investments. Oncor may increase the commitments under the facility in any amount up to $500 million, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. In May 2008, Oncor secured this credit facility with a first priority lien on certain of its transmission and distribution assets. Oncor also secured all of its existing long-term debt securities (excluding the transition bonds) with the same lien in accordance with the terms of those securities. The lien may be terminated at Oncor’s option upon the termination of Oncor’s current credit facility. See Note 5 to Financial Statements for additional information regarding the credit facility.
Distributions— In March 2008, Oncor paid a cash distribution of $57 million to Oncor Holdings, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of EFH Corp. The distribution was declared by the board of directors in February 2008. In May 2008, the board of directors declared a distribution of $78 million payable on May 14, 2008. The distributions paid by Oncor will be limited to an amount not to exceed Oncor’s net income (determined in accordance with GAAP, subject to certain defined adjustments) for the period beginning October 11, 2007 and ending December 31, 2012. Distributions are further limited by an agreement that Oncor’s regulatory capital structure, as determined by the PUCT, will be at or below the assumed debt-to-equity ratio established periodically by the PUCT for ratemaking purposes, which is currently set at 60% debt to 40% equity.
22
Financial Covenants, Credit Rating Provisions and Cross Default Provisions —Oncor’s revolving credit facility contains a financial covenant that requires maintenance of a specified leverage ratio. As of April 30, 2008, Oncor was in compliance with such covenant.
Credit Ratings — The rating agencies assign issuer credit ratings for Oncor. The issuer credit ratings as of April 30, 2008 for Oncor are BBB-, Ba1 and BBB- by S&P, Moody’s and Fitch, respectively.
Additionally, the rating agencies assign credit ratings on certain debt securities issued by Oncor. The credit ratings assigned for debt securities issued by Oncor as of April 30, 2008 are presented below:
| | | | |
| | Senior Secured | | Senior Unsecured |
S&P | | BBB- | | BBB- |
Moody’s | | Ba1 | | Ba1 |
Fitch | | BBB | | BBB- |
Moody’s and Fitch have placed the ratings for Oncor on “stable outlook”. S&P has placed Oncor’s rating on “developing outlook”.
EFH Corp. currently intends to sell a 20% minority stake in Oncor to further enhance Oncor’s separation from the Texas Holdings Group. Should the sale not be completed, Oncor believes that its long-term debt ratings could be adversely affected, including a downgrade of as much as two notches by one of the rating agencies. Similarly, if the sale is completed as intended, Oncor believes that its long-term debt ratings could be positively affected, including an upgrade of as much as two notches by one of the rating agencies.
A rating reflects only the view of a rating agency, and is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities. Ratings can be revised upward or downward at any time by a rating agency if such rating agency decides that circumstances warrant such a change.
Material Credit Rating Covenants— Certain arrangements of Oncor, including its credit facility and certain leases, contain terms pursuant to which the interest rates charged under the agreements may be adjusted depending on credit ratings.
Material Cross Default Provisions —Certain financing arrangements contain provisions that may result in an event of default if there were a failure under other financing arrangements to meet payment terms or to observe other covenants that may result in an acceleration of payments due. Such provisions are referred to as “cross default” provisions.
A default by Oncor or any subsidiary thereof with respect to indebtedness in a principal amount in excess of $50 million may result in a cross default under its credit facility. Under this facility, a default by Oncor or any subsidiary thereof may cause the maturity of outstanding balances ($1.415 billion at April 30, 2008) under such facility to be accelerated.
23
OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
As of March 31, 2008, Oncor does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements with special purpose entities or variable interest entities.
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
See Note 7 to Financial Statements for details of contingencies, including guarantees.
CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
There have been no recently issued accounting standards effective after March 31, 2008 that are expected to materially impact Oncor.
24
REGULATION AND RATES
Matters with the PUCT
Stipulation Approved by the PUCT — On April 24, 2008, the PUCT entered an order on rehearing approving the terms of a stipulation relating to the filing in 2007 by Oncor and Texas Holdings of a Merger-related Joint Report and Application with the PUCT pursuant to Section 14.101 (b) of PURA and PUCT SUBST. R.25.75. The PUCT had issued a previous order in February 2008, but entered the current order in connection with motions for rehearing requesting minor clarifications and corrections. As discussed in the 2007 Form 10-K, the stipulation requires the filing of a rate case by Oncor no later than July 1, 2008 based on a test year ended December 31, 2007.
Advanced Meter Rulemaking — In 2005, the Texas Legislature passed legislation that authorized electric utilities to impose a surcharge to recover costs incurred in deploying advanced metering and meter information networks. Benefits of the advanced metering installation include improved safety, on-demand meter reading, enhanced outage identification and restoration and system monitoring of voltages. In 2007, the PUCT issued its advanced metering rule to implement this legislation. This rule outlined the minimum required functionality for an electric utility’s advanced metering systems to qualify for cost recovery under a surcharge. Subsequent to the issuance of the rule, the PUCT opened an implementation proceeding for market participants to fine-tune the rule requirements, address the impacts of advanced metering deployment on retail and wholesale markets in ERCOT, and help ensure that retail customers receive benefits from advanced metering deployment. The implementation proceeding is expected to conclude by the summer of 2008. Oncor intends to file a surcharge case on or before July 1, 2008 to request recovery of its estimated future investment for advanced metering deployment.
At December 31, 2007, Oncor had installed approximately 600,000 automated meters in its service territory at a capital cost of approximately $125 million. Oncor intends to seek recovery of the costs of these automated meters in the general rate case to be filed with the PUCT no later than July 1, 2008. Oncor did not install any advanced meters in the three months ended March 31, 2008, but expects to begin installation of a limited number of advanced meters in the second quarter of 2008 upon completion of procurement of the meters.
Transmission Rates — In order to recover increases in its transmission costs, including fees paid to other transmission service providers, Oncor is allowed to request an update twice a year to the transmission cost recovery factor (TCRF) component of its retail delivery rate charged to REPs. In January 2008, an application was filed to increase the TCRF, which was administratively approved on February 28, 2008 and became effective March 1, 2008. This increase is expected to increase annualized revenues by $12 million.
In February 2008, Oncor filed an application for an interim update of its wholesale transmission rate. The PUCT approved Oncor’s application at its April 25, 2008 open meeting and the new rate went into effect immediately. Annualized revenues are expected to increase by approximately $39 million. Approximately $25 million of this increase is recoverable through transmission rates charged to wholesale customers, and the remaining $14 million is recoverable from REPs through the TCRF component of Oncor’s delivery rates charged to REPs.
Competitive Renewable Energy Zones (CREZ)— In the first quarter of 2007, the PUCT initiated a docket to identify the transmission facilities necessary to interconnect future renewable energy generating facilities. As part of the docket, the PUCT considered which zones would contain the best renewable energy sources. In July 2007, the PUCT voted to designate zones with generation potential of over 20,000 MW.
The PUCT also opened a project to evaluate potential transmission service providers who are interested in constructing the designated transmission facilities. In connection with this project, Oncor indicated to the PUCT its interest in constructing any designated transmission facilities, particularly those within its traditional service territory and those that interconnect with Oncor’s transmission facilities.
25
In the fourth quarter of 2007, the PUCT issued its Proposal for Publication for a new rule regarding the Selection of Transmission Service Providers to establish a process for entities interested in constructing transmission improvements to submit expressions of interest to the PUCT. The rule also establishes the procedure whereby the PUCT selects the entities responsible for constructing the transmission improvements, and specifies requirements to ensure that such entities complete the ordered improvements in a timely and cost-effective manner. The rulemaking proceeding is in a formal comment phase and a required Administrative Procedures Act hearing was held on February 12, 2008.
In March 2008, the PUCT issued an Order Requiring Settlement Conference regarding the selection of transmission service providers to construct facilities necessary to serve CREZ. The Order specifies the intent of the PUCT to continue the existing rulemaking process, but also initiates a parallel process by ordering a settlement conference regarding the selection of transmission service providers for the CREZ transmission facilities. All entities that are interested in constructing and operating CREZ transmission facilities are required to participate in the settlement conference. Oncor will continue to participate in the settlement conference.
In April 2008, ERCOT filed the results of a CREZ Transmission Optimization Study with the PUCT. The study included four scenarios of wind capacity, ranging from approximately 12,000 MW to 25,000 MW, with estimated transmission investment across ERCOT of $3.0 billion to $6.4 billion. The PUCT will determine the major transmission improvements needed to support the wind resources and select the transmission service providers that will construct the facilities. Oncor cannot predict the amount of transmission facilities in CREZ, if any, that it will construct.
Summary
Although Oncor cannot predict future regulatory or legislative actions or any changes in economic and securities market conditions, no changes are expected in trends or commitments, other than those discussed in this report, which might significantly alter its basic financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
26
ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
Market risk is the risk that Oncor may experience a loss in value as a result of changes in market conditions such as interest rates, which Oncor is exposed to in the ordinary course of business. Oncor may transact in financial instruments to hedge interest rate risk related to its indebtedness. All of Oncor’s long-term debt at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 carried fixed interest rates.
Except as discussed below, the information required hereunder is not significantly different from the information set forth in Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk included in the 2007 Form 10-K and is therefore not presented herein.
CREDIT RISK
Credit Risk— Credit risk relates to the risk of loss associated with nonperformance by counterparties. Oncor’s customers consist primarily of REPs. As a prerequisite for obtaining and maintaining certification, a REP must meet the financial resource standards established by the PUCT. REP certificates granted by the PUCT are subject to suspension and revocation for significant violation of PURA and PUCT rules. Significant violations include failure to timely remit payments for invoiced charges to a transmission and distribution utility pursuant to the terms of tariffs approved by the PUCT.
Credit Exposure — Oncor’s exposure to credit risk associated with accounts receivable totaled $144 million from affiliated customers and $227 million from unaffiliated customers as of March 31, 2008. The unaffiliated customer receivable amount is before the allowance for uncollectible accounts, which totaled $7 million at March 31, 2008, and consists almost entirely of noninvestment grade trade accounts receivable. Oncor does not have any customers that represent more than 10% of the unaffiliated trade receivable amount at March 31, 2008.
Oncor is also exposed to credit risk associated with the note receivable from TCEH totaling $315 million ($34 million reported as current in trade accounts and other receivables from affiliates) at March 31, 2008 (see Note 10 to Financial Statements for additional information).
27
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report and other presentations made by Oncor contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, that are included in this report, or made in presentations, in response to questions or otherwise, that address activities, events or developments that Oncor expects or anticipates to occur in the future, including such matters as projections, capital allocation, future capital expenditures, business strategy, competitive strengths, goals, future acquisitions or dispositions, development or operation of facilities, market and industry developments and the growth of Oncor’s business and operations (often, but not always, through the use of words or phrases such as “will likely result”, “are expected to”, “will continue”, “is anticipated”, “estimated”, “projection”, “target” and “outlook”), are forward-looking statements. Although Oncor believes that in making such forward-looking statement its expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, any such forward-looking statement involves uncertainties and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the discussion of risk factors discussed under “Risk Factors” in the 2007 Form 10-K and the following important factors, among others, that could cause the actual results of Oncor to differ materially from those projected in such forward-looking statements:
| • | | prevailing governmental policies and regulatory actions, including those of the Texas Legislature, the Governor of Texas, the FERC and the PUCT, with respect to: |
| • | | allowed rate of return; |
| • | | permitted capital structure; |
| • | | industry, market and rate structure; |
| • | | recovery of investments; |
| • | | acquisitions and disposals of assets and facilities; |
| • | | operation and construction of facilities; |
| • | | changes in tax laws and policies, and |
| • | | changes in and compliance with environmental and safety laws and policies; |
| • | | legal and administrative proceedings and settlements; |
| • | | weather conditions and other natural phenomena, and acts of sabotage, wars or terrorist activities; |
| • | | unanticipated population growth or decline, and changes in market demand and demographic patterns; |
| • | | changes in business strategy, development plans or vendor relationships; |
| • | | commercial bank market and capital market conditions; |
| • | | unanticipated changes in interest rates or rates of inflation; |
| • | | unanticipated changes in operating expenses, liquidity needs and capital expenditures; |
| • | | the credit quality and/or inability of various counterparties to meet their financial obligations to Oncor; |
| • | | general industry trends; |
| • | | changes in technology used by and services offered by Oncor; |
| • | | significant changes in Oncor’s relationship with its employees, including the availability of qualified personnel, and the potential adverse effects if labor disputes or grievances were to occur; |
28
| • | | significant changes in critical accounting policies material to Oncor; |
| • | | actions by credit rating agencies, and |
| • | | the ability of Oncor to effectively execute its operational strategy. |
Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made, and Oncor undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which it is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for Oncor to predict all of them, nor can Oncor assess the impact of each such factor or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement.
ITEM 4T. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of Oncor’s management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the disclosure controls and procedures in effect as of the end of the current period included in this quarterly report. Based on the evaluation performed, Oncor’s management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective. During the most recent fiscal quarter covered by this quarterly report, no changes in Oncor’s internal controls over financial reporting have occurred that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Oncor’s internal control over financial reporting.
29
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Reference is made to the discussion in Note 7 to Financial Statements regarding legal proceedings.
There have been no significant changes in risk factors since those disclosed under the heading “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of the 2007 Form 10-K.
| (a) | Exhibits provided as part of Part II are: |
| | | | | | | | |
Exhibits | | Previously Filed With File Number | | As Exhibit |
(4) | | Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, Including Indentures. |
| | | | |
4(a) | | | | | | — | | Deed of Trust, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing by Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC to and for the benefit of The Bank of New York, dated as of May 15, 2008. |
| | | | |
4(b) | | | | | | — | | Supplemental Indenture No. 2 dated as of May 15, 2008 between Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC and The Bank Of New York, as Trustee under the Indenture and Deed of Trust dated as of May 1, 2002 |
| | | | |
4(c) | | | | | | — | | Supplemental Indenture No. 1 dated as of May 15, 2008 between Oncor Electric Delivery CompanyLLC and The Bank Of New York, as Trustee under the Indenture (for Unsecured Debt Securities) dated as of August 1, 2002 |
| |
(31) | | Rule 13a - 14(a)/15d - 14(a) Certifications. |
| | | | |
31(a) | | | | | | — | | Certification of Robert S. Shapard, chairman of the board and chief executive officer of Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | | | |
31(b) | | | | | | — | | Certification of David M. Davis, vice president and chief financial officer of Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| |
(99) | | Additional Exhibits |
| | | | |
99 | | | | | | — | | Condensed Statements of Consolidated Income – Twelve Months Ended March 31, 2008. |
30
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
| | |
ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY COMPANY LLC |
| |
By: | | /s/ David M. Davis |
| | David M. Davis |
| | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Date: May 15, 2008
31