Emgold Mining Corporation(An Exploration Stage Company)
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in United States Dollars)
(Unaudited)
March 31, 2012 and 2011
NOTICE TO READER
Under National Instrument 51-102, Part 4, subsection 4.3(3)(a), if an auditor has not performed a review of the condensed consolidated interim financial statements, they must be accompanied by a notice indicating that the financial statements have not been reviewed by an auditor.
The accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements of Emgold Mining Corporation have been prepared by and are the responsibility of Emgold Mining Corporation’s management.
Emgold Mining Corporation’s independent auditor has not performed a review of these condensed consolidated interim financial statements in accordance with standards established by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants for a review of interim financial statements by an entity’s auditor.
Emgold Mining Corporation
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Condensed Consolidated Interim Statements of Financial Position
(expressed in United States Dollars)
| | March 31, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| | | | | | |
Assets | | | | | | |
Current assets | | | | | | |
Cash | | $ | 163,402 | | | $ | 965,102 | |
Short term investments | | | 552,771 | | | | -- | |
Accounts receivable | | | 19,678 | | | | 79,225 | |
Due from related party (note 8) | | | 51,419 | | | | 28,531 | |
Prepaid expenses and deposits | | | 37,260 | | | | 42,966 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | 824,530 | | | | 1,115,824 | |
Other assets | | | 12,095 | | | | 11,932 | |
Marketable securities (note 4) | | | 16,627 | | | | 17,071 | |
Property and equipment (note 5) | | | 16,527 | | | | 18,176 | |
Mineral property interests (note 6) | | | 1,069,024 | | | | 1,035,163 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 1,938,803 | | | $ | 2,198,166 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | $ | 270,761 | | | $ | 303,019 | |
Due to related party (note 8) | | | 207,618 | | | | 160,965 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | 478,379 | | | | 463,984 | |
Warrant liability (note 7(c)) | | | 771,000 | | | | 1,079,253 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | 1,249,379 | | | | 1,543,237 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Equity (deficiency) | | | | | | | | |
Share capital (note7(a)) | | | 42,827,797 | | | | 42,817,739 | |
Warrants (note 7(c)) | | | 1,219,617 | | | | 1,219,617 | |
Contributed surplus (note7(b)) | | | 6,800,722 | | | | 6,800,722 | |
Deficit | | | (50,158,712 | ) | | | (50,183,149 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | 689,924 | | | | 654,929 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 1,938,803 | | | $ | 2,198,166 | |
Nature of Operations and Going Concern (note 1)Subsequent Events (note 13)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
Emgold Mining Corporation
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Condensed Consolidated Interim Statements of Loss and Comprehensive Loss
for the three months ended March 31,
(expressed in United States Dollars)
| | March 31, | | | March 31, | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| | | | | | |
Expenses | | | | | | |
Exploration and evaluation costs (note 12) | | $ | 160,457 | | | $ | 212,295 | |
Salaries and benefits | | | 55,532 | | | | 35,942 | |
Legal, accounting and audit | | | 23,567 | | | | 53,803 | |
Office and administration | | | 33,676 | | | | 30,502 | |
Shareholder communications | | | 22,474 | | | | 15,748 | |
Unrealized loss on marketable securities (note 4) | | | 1,437 | | | | 6,543 | |
Stock-based compensation (note 7(b)) | | | -- | | | | 45,813 | |
Management and consulting fees | | | 10,519 | | | | 10,592 | |
Depreciation | | | 4,705 | | | | 3,557 | |
Travel | | | 1,688 | | | | -- | |
Interest and other income | | | (8,703 | ) | | | -- | |
Gain on sale of property and equipment | | | (3,850 | ) | | | -- | |
Foreign exchange (gain) loss | | | (17,686 | ) | | | (11,564 | ) |
Unrealized gain on warrant liability (note 7(c)) | | | (308,253 | ) | | | (23,046 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net loss and comprehensive loss (gain) or the period | | | (24,437 | ) | | | 380,185 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net loss per share - basic and diluted | | $ | (0.00 | ) | | $ | (0.01 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding | | | 58,741,977 | | | | 38,552,444 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
Emgold Mining Corporation
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Condensed Consolidated Interim Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity
(expressed in United States Dollars)
| | Share Capital | | | | | | | | | | | | Total | |
| | without par value | | | | | | | | | | | | Shareholder | |
| | (note 9) | | | | | | Contributed | | | | | | Equity | |
| | Shares | | | Amount | | | Warrants | | | Surplus | | | Deficit | | | (Deficiency) | |
Balance, January 1, 2011 | | | 38,552,444 | | | $ | 41,490,268 | | | $ | 1,271,008 | | | $ | 6,629,389 | | | $ | (47,845,089 | ) | | $ | 1,545,576 | |
Stock-based compensation | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 58,978 | | | | - | | | | 58,978 | |
Net loss and comprehensive loss for the period | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (380,185 | ) | | | (380,185 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, March 31, 2011 | | | 38,552,444 | | | $ | 41,490,268 | | | $ | 1,271,008 | | | $ | 6,688,367 | | | $ | (48,225,274 | ) | | $ | 1,224,369 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, January 1, 2012 | | | 58,714,504 | | | $ | 42,817,739 | | | $ | 1,219,617 | | | $ | 6,800,722 | | | $ | (50,183,149 | ) | | $ | 654,929 | |
Shares issued for property acquisitions | | | 100,000 | | | | 10,058 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 10,058 | |
Net loss and comprehensive gain for the period | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 24,437 | | | | 24,437 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, March 31, 2012 | | | 58,814,504 | | | $ | 42,827,797 | | | $ | 1,219,617 | | | $ | 6,800,722 | | | $ | (50,158,712 | ) | | $ | 689,424 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
Emgold Mining Corporation
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Condensed Consolidated Interim Statements of Cash Flows
for the three months ended March 31,
(expressed in United States Dollars)
| | March 31, 2012 | | March 31, 2011 | |
Cash flow from operating activities | | | | | | | |
Net loss and comprehensive (loss) gain for the period | | $ | 24,437 | | $ | (380,185 | ) |
Items not affecting cash | | | | | | | |
Depreciation | | | 4,705 | | | 3,558 | |
Gain on sale of property and equipment | | | (3,850 | ) | | — | |
Effect of currency translation | | | (1,156 | ) | | 5,274 | |
Stock-based compensation | | | — | | | 58,978 | |
Unrealized loss on marketable securities | | | 1,437 | | | 6,543 | |
Unrealized gain on warrant liability | | | (308,253 | ) | | (23,046 | ) |
Changes in non-cash operating working capital | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable | | | 59,547 | | | 5,809 | |
Due to/from related parties | | | 23,765 | | | 163,727 | |
Prepaid expenses and deposits | | | 5,706 | | | (50,418 | ) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | | (32,258 | ) | | 36,137 | |
| | | (225,920 | ) | | (173,623 | ) |
Cash flow from investing activities | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of equipment | | | 3,850 | | | — | |
Purchase of short-term investment | | | (552,771 | ) | | — | |
Finance lease payments | | | — | | | (1,838 | ) |
Mineral property acquisition | | | (23,803 | ) | | — | |
Equipment additions | | | (3,056 | ) | | — | |
| | | (575,780 | ) | | (1,838 | ) |
Cash flow from financing activities | | | | | | | |
Share subscriptions, net of issuance costs | | | — | | | — | |
Decrease in cash | | | (801,700 | ) | | (175,461 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | | | 965,102 | | | 917,495 | |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | | $ | 163,402 | | $ | 742,034 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
Emgold Mining Corporation
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(expressed in United States Dollars)
1. Nature of Operations and Going Concern
Emgold Mining Corporation (“the Company”) is incorporated under the British Columbia Corporations Act and the principal place of business is located at 1400-570 Granville Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 3P1. The Company is in the process of exploring its mineral property interests and has not yet determined whether its mineral property interests contain mineral reserves that are economically recoverable.
The consolidated financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors on May 29, 2012.
The Company’s continuing operations and the underlying value and recoverability of the amounts shown for mineral property interests are entirely dependent upon the existence of economically recoverable mineral reserves, the ability of the Company to obtain the necessary financing to complete the exploration and development of its mineral property interests and on future profitable production or proceeds from the disposition of the mineral property interests or other interests. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the continuing financial support of related parties and shareholders or obtaining other financing to continue exploration and/or development of its mineral property interests and to meet its administrative overhead costs. The current equity and financial market conditions, the challenging environment for raising monies, and the low price of the Company’s common stock may make it difficult to obtain additional funding by private placements of shares. While the Company is making its best efforts to achieve its plans by examining various financing alternatives including reorganizations, mergers, sales of assets, or other forms of equity financing, there is no assurance that any such activity will generate funds that will be available for operations. These consolidated financial statements do not reflect any adjustments to the carrying value of assets and liabilities that would be necessary if the Company was unable to continue as a going concern. Changes in future conditions could require material write-downs of the carrying values of mineral properties property interests.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
(a) Statement of compliance
These consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”).
The adoption of IFRS resulted in changes to the accounting policies as compared with the most recent annual financial statements prepared under Canadian GAAP. The accounting policies set out below have been applied consistently to all periods presented. They also have been applied in the preparation of an opening IFRS statement of financial position as at January 1, 2010, as required by IFRS 1, First Time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS 1"). The impact of the transition from Canadian GAAP to IFRS is explained in note 15.
Emgold Mining Corporation
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in United States Dollars)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued
(b) Basis of presentation
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a historical cost basis, with the exception of financial instruments classified as at fair value through profit or loss and available-for-sale which are measured at fair value.
These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Idaho-Maryland Mining Corporation, Emgold (US) Corp. and Golden Bear Ceramics Company. All inter-company transactions are eliminated on consolidation.
(c) Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on deposit with banks and short-term interest-bearing investments with maturities of 90 days or less from the original date of acquisition. Cash and cash equivalents are recorded at fair value and changes in fair value are reflected in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss. The Company had cash equivalents of $552,771 as at March 31, 2012 and Nil as at December 31, 2011.
Financial assets
Financial assets are classified as either financial assets at fair value through profit or loss (“FVTPL”), loans and receivables, held-to-maturity investments (“HTM”), or available-for-sale financial assets (“AFS”), as appropriate at initial recognition and, except in very limited circumstances, the classification is not changed subsequent to initial recognition. The classification is determined at initial recognition and depends on the nature and purpose of the financial asset. A financial asset is derecognized when its contractual rights to the asset’s cash flows expire or if substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset are transferred.
Financial assets at FVTPL
A financial asset is classified as FVTPL when the financial asset is held-for-trading or it is designated upon initial recognition as an FVTPL. A financial asset is classified as held-for- trading if (1) it has been acquired principally for the purpose of selling or repurchasing in the near term; (2) it is part of an identified portfolio of financial instruments that the Company manages and has an actual pattern of short-term profit taking; or (3) it is a derivative that is not designated and effective as a hedging instrument. Financial assets at FVTPL are carried in the consolidated statements of financial position at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss. Transaction costs are expensed as incurred. The Company has classified cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities as FVTPL.
Emgold Mining Corporation
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in United States Dollars)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued
| (d) | Financial instruments - continued |
Loans and receivables
Trade receivables, loans and other receivables that have fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market are classified as loans and receivables. Loans and receivables are initially recognized at fair value plus transaction costs that are directly attributable to their acquisition or issue, and are subsequently carried at amortized cost less losses for impairment. The impairment loss of receivables is based on a review of all outstanding amounts at period end. Bad debts are written off during the period in which they are identified. Amortized cost is calculated taking into account any discount or premium on acquisition and includes fees that are an integral part of the effective interest rate and transaction costs. Gains and losses are recognized in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss when the loans and receivables are derecognized or impaired, as well as through the depreciation process. The Company has classified accounts receivable and due from related party as loans and receivables.
AFS financial assets
Non-derivative financial assets not included in the above categories are classified as AFS financial assets. They are carried at fair value with changes in fair value generally recognized in other comprehensive loss and accumulated in the AFS reserve. Impairment losses are recognized in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss. Purchases and sales of AFS financial assets are recognized on settlement date with any change in fair value between trade date and settlement date being recognized in the AFS reserve. On sale, the cumulative gain or loss recognized in other comprehensive income is reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income. The Company has not designated any of its financial assets as AFS.
Impairment of financial assets
The Company assesses at each reporting date whether a financial asset or a group of financial assets is impaired. A financial asset or group of financial assets is deemed to be impaired, if, and only if, there is objective evidence of impairment as a result of one or more events that has occurred after the initial recognition of the asset and that event has an impact on the estimated future cash flows of the financial asset or the group of financial assets that can be reliably estimated.
For financial assets carried at amortized cost, the amount of the impairment is the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows, discounted at the asset’s original effective rate.
Emgold Mining Corporation
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in United States Dollars)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued
| (d) | Financial instrument - continued |
Impairment of financial assets - continued
The carrying amount of all financial assets, excluding accounts receivable, is directly reduced by the impairment loss. The carrying amount of trade receivables is reduced through the use of an allowance account. Associated allowances are written off when there is no realistic prospect of future recovery and all collateral has been realized or has been transferred to the Company. Subsequent recoveries of amounts previously written off are credited against the allowance account. Changes in the carrying amount of the allowance account are recognized in the statement of loss and comprehensive loss. A provision for impairment is made in relation to accounts receivable, and an impairment loss is recognized in the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss when there is objective evidence that the Company will not be able to collect all of the amounts due under the original terms. With the exception of AFS equity instruments, if in a subsequent period the amount of impairment loss decreases and the decrease relates to an event occurring after the impairment was recognized, the previously recognized impairment loss is reversed through the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss. On the date of impairment reversal, the carrying amount of the financial asset cannot exceed its amortized cost had the impairment not been recognized.
Effective interest method
The effective interest method calculates the amortized cost of a financial instrument asset or liability and allocates interest income over the corresponding period. The effective interest rate is the rate that discounts estimated future cash receipts over the expected life of the financial asset or liability, or where appropriate, a shorter period. Income is recognized on an effective interest basis for debt instruments other than those financial assets classified as FVTPL.
Financial liabilities
Financial liabilities are classified as financial liabilities as FVTPL, or other financial liabilities, as appropriate upon initial recognition. A financial liability is derecognized when the obligation under the liability is discharged, cancelled or expired.
Financial liabilities classified as other financial liabilities are initially recognized at fair value less directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to the initial recognition, other financial liabilities are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method. The Company’s other financial liabilities include accounts payables and accrued liabilities and due to related party.
Financial liabilities are classified as FVTPL if they are acquired for the purpose of selling in the near term. This category includes derivative financial instruments (including separated embedded derivatives) unless they are designated as effective hedging instruments. Gains or losses on liabilities classified as FVTPL are recognized in the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss. The Company’s financial liabilities classified as FVTPL include the warrant liability.
Emgold Mining Corporation
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in United States Dollars)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued
| (d) | Financial instrument - continued |
Financial instruments carried at fair value
Financial instruments recorded at fair value on the statements of financial position are classified using a fair value hierarchy that reflects the significance of the inputs used in making the measurements. The fair value hierarchy has the following levels:
| Level 1 | - | valuation based on quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; |
| Level 2 | - | valuation techniques based on inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices); and |
| Level 3 | - | valuation techniques using inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs). |
As of March 31, 2012 the fair values of cash and cash equivalents and the marketable securities consisting of common shares (valued using quoted prices (unadjusted) from an active market) have been measured using level 1 inputs. Marketable securities consisting of common share purchase warrants and the warrant liability, both instruments having their fair value determined using the Black-Scholes model, have been measured using level 3 inputs.
(e) Property and equipment
Equipment is recorded at cost and depreciation begins when the asset is put into service. Depreciation is recorded on a straight-line basis over five years for plant and field equipment, office furniture and equipment, research equipment and vehicles and over three years for computer hardware and software, and over the term of the lease for leasehold improvements.
(f) Mineral property interests
Mineral property acquisition costs are capitalized and deferred until the mineral property to which they relate is placed into production, sold, allowed to lapse, or is determined to be impaired. These costs are amortized on a units-of-production basis following commencement of commercial production or will be written off or down if the property is sold, allowed to lapse, or is determined to be impaired.
Mineral property acquisition costs include cash costs and the fair value of common shares, based on the trading price of the shares, issued for mineral property interests pursuant to the terms of the related property agreement. Payments relating to a property acquired under an option or joint venture agreement, where payments are made at the sole discretion of the Company, are recorded as mineral property costs upon payment.
Although the Company has taken steps to verify title to mineral properties in which it has an interest, in accordance with industry standards for the current stage of exploration of such properties, these procedures do not guarantee a clear title. Property title may be subject to unregistered prior agreements and regulatory requirements. Administrative, property investigation, and exploration and evaluation expenditures are expensed in the period incurred.
Emgold Mining Corporation
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in United States Dollars)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued
(g) Exploration and evaluation costs
Exploration and development expenditures are expensed until the Company has determined that the property is economically viable and a production decision is made.
(h) Impairment of non-financial assets
At the end of each reporting period, the Company reviews the carrying amounts of its non-financial assets with finite lives to determine whether there is any indication that those assets have suffered an impairment loss. Where such an indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment loss. The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset’s fair value less cost to sell or its value in use. An impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the asset’s carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. In addition, long-lived assets that are not amortized are subject to an annual impairment assessment.
(i) Option and royalty agreements
Option payments and certain royalties are made at the discretion of the optionee and, accordingly, are accounted for on a cash basis. Option payments received are treated as a reduction of the carrying value of the related mineral property until the Company’s option and royalty payments received are in excess of costs incurred and then are credited to the statement of loss.
(j) Translation of foreign currencies
These consolidated financial statements are presented in United States dollars (“$”), which is the Company’s functional and presentation currency. References to Cdn$ represent Canadian dollars. The functional currency for the Company’s subsidiaries is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates which is United States dollars. Transactions entered into by the Company’s subsidiary in a currency other than the currency of the primary economic environment in which it operates (its "functional currency") are recorded at the rates ruling when the transactions occur except depreciation and depreciation which are translated at the rates of exchange applicable to the related assets, with any gains or losses recognized in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss. Foreign currency monetary assets and liabilities are translated at current rates of exchange with the resulting gain or losses recognized in the consolidated statements of comprehensive loss. Exchange differences arising on the retranslation of unsettled monetary assets and liabilities are recognized immediately in consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss. Non-monetary assets and liabilities are translated using the historical exchange rates. Non-monetary assets and liabilities measured at fair value in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rates at the date when the fair value is determined.
Emgold Mining Corporation
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in United States Dollars)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued
(k) Flow-through common shares
Flow-through shares are a unique Canadian tax incentive. They are the subject of specific guidance under US GAAP, but there is no equivalent IFRS guidance. Therefore, the Company has adopted a policy whereby flow-through proceeds are allocated between the offering of the common shares and the sale of tax benefits when the common shares are offered. The allocation is made based on the difference between the quoted price of the common shares and the amount the investor pays for the flow-through shares. A liability is recognized for the premium paid by the investors and is then derecognized in the period of renunciation. The recognition of a deferred income tax liability upon renunciation of the flow-through expenditures is recorded as income tax expense in the period of renunciation.
(l) Income taxes
Income tax expense consists of current and deferred tax expense. Income tax expense is recognized in the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss, except to the extent that it relates to items recognized in other comprehensive income or directly in equity. In this case, the tax is also recognized in other comprehensive income or directly in equity.
Current income tax assets and liabilities for the current and prior periods are measured at the amount expected to be recovered from or paid to the taxation authorities. The tax rates and tax laws used to compute current income tax assets and liabilities are measured at future anticipated tax rates, which have been enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date. Current tax assets and current tax liabilities are only offset if a legally enforceable right exists to set off the amounts, and the Company intends to settle on a net basis, or to realize the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.
Deferred taxation is provided on all qualifying temporary differences at the reporting date between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes. Deferred tax assets are only recognized to the extent that it is probable that the deductible temporary differences will reverse in the foreseeable future and future taxable profit will be available against which the temporary difference can be utilized.
Deferred tax liabilities and assets are not recognized for temporary differences between the carrying amount and tax bases of investments in controlled entities where the parent entity is able to control the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences and it is probable that the differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax assets and liabilities and when the deferred tax balances relate to the same taxation authority.
Emgold Mining Corporation
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in United States Dollars)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued
(m) Provisions and contingencies
Provisions are recognized when a legal or constructive obligation exists, as a result of past events, and it is probable that an outflow of resources that can be reliably estimated will be required to settle the obligation. Where the effect is material, the provision is discounted using an appropriate current market-based pre-tax discount rate. The increase in the provision due to passage of time is recognized as interest expense.
When a contingency substantiated by confirming events can be reliably measured and is probable to result in an economic outflow, a liability is recognized as the best estimate required to settle the obligation. A contingent liability is disclosed where the existence of an obligation will only be confirmed by future events, or where the amount of a present obligation cannot be measured reliably or will probably not result in an economic outflow. Contingent assets are only disclosed when the inflow of economic benefits is probable. When the economic benefit becomes virtually certain, the asset is no longer contingent and is recognized in the consolidated financial statements.
(n) Loss per common share
Basic loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss applicable by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares issued and outstanding during the reporting period and all additional common shares for the assumed exercise of options and warrants outstanding for the reporting period, if dilutive. The treasury stock method is used for the assumed proceeds upon the exercise of options and warrants that are used to purchase common shares at the average market price during the reporting period. As the Company is incurring losses, basic and diluted loss per share are the same since including the exercise of outstanding options and share purchase warrants in the diluted loss per share calculation would be anti-dilutive.
(o) Share-based payments
Equity-settled share-based payments for directors, officers and employees are measured at fair value at the date of grant and recorded as compensation expense in the consolidated financial statements. The fair value determined at the grant date of the equity-settled share-based payments is expensed over the vesting period based on the Company’s estimate of shares that will eventually vest. The number of forfeitures likely to occur is estimated on grant date and adjusted to actual. Any consideration paid by directors, officers, employees and consultants on exercise of equity-settled share-based payments is credited to share capital. Shares are issued from treasury upon the exercise of equity-settled share-based instruments.
Emgold Mining Corporation
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in United States Dollars)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued
(o) Share-based payments - continued
Compensation expense on stock options granted to non-employees is measured at the earlier of the completion of performance and the date the options are vested using the fair value method and is recorded as an expense in the same period as if the Company had paid cash for the goods or services received.
When the value of goods or services received in exchange for the share-based payment cannot be reliably estimated, the fair value is measured by use of a Black-Scholes valuation model. The expected life used in the model is adjusted, based on management’s best estimate, for the effects of non-transferability, exercise restrictions, and behavioural considerations.
(p) Significant accounting judgments and estimates
The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires management to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Actual outcomes could differ from these estimates. These consolidated financial statements include estimates that, by their nature, are uncertain. The impacts of such estimates are pervasive throughout the consolidated financial statements, and may require accounting adjustments based on future occurrences. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimate is revised and future periods if the revision affects both current and future periods. These estimates are based on historical experience, current and future economic conditions and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.
(q) Critical accounting estimates
Significant assumptions about the future that management has made that could result in a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities, in the event that actual results differ from assumptions made, relate to, but are not limited to, the following:
| (i) | the recoverability of costs incurred to purchase mineral property interests; |
| (ii) | the inputs used in accounting for share based payment transactions and in valuation of warrants included in marketable securities and warrant liability; and |
| (iii) | management assumption of no material provisions or obligations, based on the facts and circumstances that existed during the period. |
Emgold Mining Corporation
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in United States Dollars)
3. Accounting Standards Issued But Not Yet Effective
The Company has reviewed new and revised accounting pronouncements that have been issued but are not yet effective and determined that the following may have an impact on the Company:
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments (“IFRS 9”) was issued by the IASB on November 12, 2009 and will replace IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement (“IAS 39”). IFRS 9 replaces the multiple rules in IAS 39 with a single approach to determine whether a financial asset is measured at amortized cost or fair value and a new mixed measurement model for debt instruments having only two categories: amortized cost and fair value. The approach in IFRS 9 is based on how an entity manages its financial instruments in the context of its business model and the contractual cash flow characteristics of the financial assets. The new standard also requires a single impairment method to be used, replacing the multiple impairment methods in IAS 39. IFRS 9 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of IFRS 9 on its consolidated financial statements.
IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements (“IFRS 10”) establishes principles for the presentation and preparation of consolidated financial statements when an entity controls one or more other entities. IFRS 10 supersedes IAS 27 “Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements” and SIC-12 “Consolidated – Special Purpose Entities” and is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. Earlier application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on its consolidated financial statements.
IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements (“IFRS 11”) establishes principles for financial reporting by parties to a joint arrangement. IFRS 11 supersedes the current IAS 31 “Interests in Joint Ventures” and SIC-13 “Jointly Controlled Entities – Non-Monetary Contributions by Venturers” and is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. Earlier application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on its consolidated financial statements.
IFRS 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities (“IFRS 12”) applies to entities that have an interest in a subsidiary, a joint arrangement, an associate or an unconsolidated structured entity. IFRS 12 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. Earlier application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on its consolidated financial statements.
IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurements (���IFRS 13”) defines fair value, sets out in a single IFRS framework for measuring fair value and requires disclosures about fair value measurements. IFRS 13 applies to IFRS that require or permit fair value measurements or disclosures about fair value measurements (and measurements, such as fair value less costs to sell, based on fair value or disclosures about those measurements), except in specified circumstances. IFRS 13 is to be applied for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2015. Earlier application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on its consolidated financial statements.
Emgold Mining Corporation
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in United States Dollars)
4. Marketable Securities
Pursuant to the terms of the Lease and Option to Purchase Agreement (note 6), on January 31, 2011, Valterra issued to the Company 50,000 units consisting of one common share and one share purchase warrant. Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase one common share of Valterra at $0.10 for a five year period. On the date of issue the common shares were valued at $3,268 and the warrants were valued at $1,637 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: 2 year term, 99% volatility, risk free interest rate of 1.64% and a dividend rate of Nil.
Pursuant to an amendment of the Lease and Option to Purchase Agreement (note 6), on February 11, 2011, Valterra issued to the Company 600,000 units consisting of one common share and one share purchase warrant. Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase one common share of Valterra at $0.10 for a two year period. On the date of issue the common shares were valued at $42,870 and the warrants were valued at $18,301 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: 2 year term, 99% volatility, risk free interest rate of 1.64% and a dividend rate of Nil.
As at March 31, 2012, the common shares and warrants of Valterra were revalued at fair market value of $16,627 resulting in an unrealized loss on marketable securities of $1,437. The fair value of the warrants ($2,585) was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions: 1.46 year term, 135% volatility, risk free interest rate of 1.01% and a dividend rate of Nil.
Emgold Mining Corporation
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in United States Dollars)
5. Property and Equipment
March 31, 2012 | | | | | | | |
| | Cost | | Accumulated Depreciation | | Net Book Value | |
Plant and field equipment | | $ | 18,711 | | $ | 15,859 | | $ | 2,852 | |
Office furniture and equipment | | | 61,669 | | | 56,875 | | | 4,794 | |
Computer hardware and software | | | 78,216 | | | 69,335 | | | 8,881 | |
Vehicle - held under capital lease | | | 38,833 | | | 38,833 | | | — | |
| | $ | 197,429 | | $ | 180,902 | | $ | 16,527 | |
December 31, 2011
| | Cost | | Accumulated Depreciation | | Net Book Value | |
Plant and field equipment | | $ | 15,656 | | $ | 15,656 | | $ | — | |
Office furniture and equipment | | | 46,164 | | | 39,485 | | | 6,679 | |
Computer hardware and software | | | 71,945 | | | 60,448 | | | 11,497 | |
Vehicle - held under capital lease | | | 38,833 | | | 38,833 | | | — | |
| | $ | 172,598 | | $ | 154,422 | | $ | 18,176 | |
6. Mineral Property Interests
| | | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2012 | | December 31, 2011 | |
Mineral property acquisition costs | | | | | | | |
Idaho-Maryland Property, California | | $ | 747,219 | | $ | 747,219 | |
Buckskin Rawhide and Koegel Properties, Nevada | | | 72,913 | | | 39,052 | |
Stewart Property, British Columbia | | | 199,667 | | | 199,667 | |
Rozan Gold Property, British Columbia | | | 49,225 | | | 49,225 | |
| | $ | 1,069,024 | | $ | 1,035,163 | |
Emgold Mining Corporation
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in United States Dollars)
6. Mineral Property Interests - continued
Idaho-Maryland Property, California
In fiscal 2002, the Company renegotiated a lease with the owners of the Idaho-Maryland Property (“I-M Property”) and surrounding areas in the Grass Valley Mining District, California.
The owners granted to the Company the exclusive right and option to purchase all of the leased property. The property is subject to a 3% Net Smelter Royalty (“NSR”) from production if the property is still being leased. Any royalty payments made prior to exercising the purchase option may be deducted from the purchase price. During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company extended the lease and option agreement from February 1, 2011, for an additional two years to February 1, 2013. Lease payments during the extension period will be $30,000 per quarter. In conjunction with the extension, the lessors agreed to defer payments for 2010 totaling $120,000. Under the terms of the deferral, this amount will now be added to the purchase price of the I-M Property, the first installment of which becomes due on February 1, 2013. The $120,000 will be subject to interest calculated at 5.25% compounded annually.
Provided that payments are kept current, the Company may purchase the property at any time. The purchase price at February 1, 2013, would be $6,154,717, and is being increased by 3% each lease-year. In April 2004, the Company acquired a parcel of land adjacent to other properties under option by the Company in Grass Valley, California from a non-related party, in addition to the purchase of mining rights from another non-related party on other claims for a total of $589,276 in mineral property acquisition costs.
In 2009, the Company entered into an agreement to acquire 7.13 acres of land known as the "Whisper Property". Under the terms of the agreement, the Company agreed to a one-time share issuance of 280,823 common shares at a market price of Cdn$0.55 per share on the date of filing to the seller for the purchase of the Whisper Property. No common shares were issued as bonuses, finder's fees or commissions in connection with this transaction. The common shares issued pursuant to the agreement are subject to a hold period of four (4) months, plus one (1) day from the date of issuance.
Emgold Mining Corporation
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in United States Dollars)
6. Mineral Property Interests - continued
Buckskin Rawhide Property, Nevada
In January 2010 the Company completed a lease and option to purchase agreement to acquire 100% of the rights to the Buckskin Rawhide mineral claims, a gold prospect located near Fallon, Nevada. The Company has agreed to lease the property from Nevada Sunrise, LLC subject to the following advance royalty payments: $10,000 annually for the years 2009 to 2011; $20,000 in 2012; $40,000 in 2013, and $60,000 from 2014 to 2019. During the lease period, the Company may conduct exploration and, if warranted, complete a NI 43 101 compliant feasibility study. On completion of the feasibility study, the Company may acquire 100% ownership of the property by paying Nevada Sunrise, LLC an additional amount of $250,000. Nevada Sunrise, LLC is required to use these funds to purchase a retained 25% interest in the property from Maurice and Lorraine Castagne, pursuant to an underlying property agreement, and to transfer that title to the Company. Upon commercial production and after acquisition of 100% interest in the property, Nevada Sunrise, LLC will be entitled to a 2.5% NSR on production from the property. The annual lease payments of $10,000 due in December 2011 and 2010 were paid by the issuance of 106,290 and 49,424 common shares, respectively.
In February 2012, the Company signed a Lease and Option to Purchase Agreement with Jeremy C. Wire to acquire the PC and RH mineral claims, located 0.3 miles west of Emgold’s existing Buckskin Rawhide Property, in Mineral County, Nevada. The PC and RH claims, “Buckskin Rawhide West”, comprise 21 unpatented lode mining claims totalling 420 acres. Pursuant to the lease agreement, advance royalty payments will be payable by the Company to Jeremy C. Wire in the amount of $10,000 per year during years 2012 to 2014, $20,000 in 2015 and $30,000 per year in years 2016 to 2018.
This acquisition expands the Company’s Buckskin Rawhide gold-silver property (the Property”) to 73 unpatented mining claims totaling 1,460 acres. Forty-six of these claims are under a lease and option to purchase agreement with Nevada Sunrise, LLC and the remaining six claims were staked by Emgold. The Property now consists of two non-contiguous claim blocks; Buckskin Rawhide and Buckskin Rawhide West.
Buckskin Koegel , Nevada
In February, 2012, the Company signed a Lease and Option to Purchase Agreement with Jeremy C. Wire to acquire the RHT and GEL claims, located four miles south of the Company’s Buckskin Rawhide Claims in Mineral County, Nevada. The RHT and GEL claims “Koegel Rawhide Property” comprise 19 unpatented lode mining claims totaling 380 acres. Pursuant to the lease agreement, advance royalty payment will be payable by the Company to Jeremy C. Wire in the amount of $10,000 per year during years 2012 to 2014, $20,000 in 2015 and $30,000 per year in years 2016 to 2018.
Rozan Gold Property, British Columbia
In 2000, the Company entered into an option agreement to acquire the rights to the Rozan Gold Property, a prospect located in British Columbia. The Company holds a 100% interest in the property, subject to a 3.0% NSR. The Company has the right to purchase 66% of the royalty for the sum of Cdn$1,000,000 and has the first right of refusal to purchase the remaining 33%.
During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company entered into a Lease and Option to Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Valterra Resource Corporation (“Valterra”). The Agreement calls for cumulative work commitments of $1,000,000 over 5 years, with a commitment of $50,000 in 2010, $200,000 in 2011, and $250,000 in each of years 3 to 5.
Emgold Mining Corporation
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in United States Dollars)
The term of the Agreement is for a period of 5 years, with property payments of cash, common shares and 5-year warrants to be made by Valterra to the Company during the lease as follows:
| | | |
Period | CDN$ | Shares | 5 Year Warrants |
Signing | Nil | 50,000 | 50,000 |
Year 1 | $30,000 | 50,000 | 50,000 |
Year 2 | $30,000 | 50,000 | 50,000 |
Year 3 | $40,000 | 50,000 | 50,000 |
Year 4 | $40,000 | 50,000 | 50,000 |
Year 5 | $60,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 |
Total | $200,000 | 350,000 | 350,000 |
The price of the warrants will be equal to the price of the common shares at the time of issuance.
On January 31, 2011 the Company received the Year 1 share payment of 50,000 common shares and a warrant certificate representing 50,000 warrants of Valterra Resource Corporation.
Emgold Mining Corporation
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in United States Dollars)
6. Mineral Property Interests - continued
Rozan Gold Property, British Columbia - continued
On February 8, 2011 the Company signed an amendment agreement to the Agreement whereby the Company agreed to accept securities of Valterra in satisfaction of the $30,000 cash payment due on the effective date of the agreement. Subsequent to this agreement, the Company received 600,000 Units of Valterra at a deemed price of $0.05 per Unit, each Unit comprising one common share of Valterra and one warrant, each such warrant exercisable to acquire one additional share at an exercise price of $0.10 per Share for a period of 24 months from the date of issue.
Upon completion of the lease payments and work commitments, Valterra will acquire the Rozan Property, subject to an underlying NSR. Valterra will use its best efforts to complete a NI 43-101 resource estimate for the property by year 5, subject to results obtained from exploration and development work.
Under the agreement with Valterra, should the Company elect to acquire two thirds of the NSR currently held by the original optionors, or a 2% NSR, Valterra will have 30 days to exercise an option to obtain half of this interest (a 1% NSR) for Cdn$500,000. The Company will use this payment as part of the required payment to acquire the 2% NSR from the original optionors and will then transfer the 1% NSR to Valterra. Should Valterra elect not to exercise its option at this time, it shall retain a further option to acquire the 1% NSR from the Company at a future date for Cdn$750,000. The Company will retain its first right of refusal with the original optionors to acquire the remaining 1% of their NSR, should they elect to sell it to a third party. Should the Company obtain this 1% NSR, Valterra shall have first right of refusal if the Company elects to sell it to a third party.
In January 2012, after failing to meet its work commitments on the Rozan Gold Property, Valterra announced that it has elected to terminate the Agreement with the Company. The property was returned to Emgold in January, 2012.
Stewart Property, British Columbia
Pursuant to an option agreement entered into in 2001 and completed in 2008, the Company acquired the rights to the Stewart mineral claims, a prospect located close to Nelson in south eastern British Columbia. The Company holds a 100% right, title and interest in and to the property, subject only to a 3% NSR payable to the optionors. The Company has the right to purchase 66% of the royalty for the sum of Cdn$1,000,000 and has the first right of refusal to purchase the remaining 33%. The Company has staked six claims contiguous to the Stewart Property located in south-eastern British Columbia.
Emgold Mining Corporation
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in United States Dollars)
7. Share Capital
Authorized
| Unlimited | | Number of common shares without par value |
| Unlimited | | Number of preference shares without par value |
(a) Common shares, issued and fully paid
At the Annual and Special General Meeting of its shareholders held on September 18, 2009, the shareholders approved a special resolution to alter the Company’s authorized share structure by consolidating all of the issued and outstanding common shares without par value, of which 168,972,873 pre-consolidation common shares were issued, on the basis of ten (10) pre-consolidation common shares to one (1) post-consolidation common share, after adjusting for rounding, or 16,894,310 post-consolidation common shares. In addition, the issued and outstanding Class A preference shares were consolidated on the same basis, resulting in 394,843 Class A preference shares, after consolidation. The share consolidation of the common shares without par value and the Class A preference shares was effective December 21, 2009. All periods presented have been retroactively adjusted to reflect this reverse split.
Financing
December 31, 2011
In November, 2011 the Company completed the first tranche of a non-brokered private placement which comprised 11,620,000 units at a price of Cdn$0.10 per unit. Each unit consists of one common share of the Company and one non-transferable share purchase warrant. Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase, for a period of 24 months, one additional share at a price of Cdn$0.15. The share purchase warrants were valued using a Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions: weighted average risk free interest rate of 1.23%, volatility factors of 101% and an expected life of 2 years. The total value ascribed to the share purchase warrants was $392,614.
Finder’s fees of Cdn$53,600 and 536,000 finder’s warrants were awarded in relation to the first tranche of the financing. Each finder’s warrant entitles the holder to purchase, for a period of 24 months, one common share of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.15. The finder warrants were valued using a Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions: weighted average risk free interest rate of 1.23%, volatility factors of 101% and an expected life of 2 years. The total value ascribed to the finder's warrants was $40,845.
| In December, 2011 the Company completed the second tranche of a non-brokered private placement which comprised 2,530,000 units at a price of Cdn$0.10 per unit. Each unit consists of one common share of the Company and one non-transferable purchase warrant (a “Warrant”). Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase, for a period of 24 months, one additional share. The share purchase warrants were valued using a Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions: weighted average risk free interest rate of 1.23%, volatility factors of 102% and an expected life of 2 years. The total value ascribed to the share purchase warrants was $78,847. |
Emgold Mining Corporation
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in United States Dollars)
7. Share Capital - continued
(a) Common shares, issued and fully paid - continued
Financing - continued
Finder’s fees of Cdn$3,200 and 32,000 finder’s warrants were awarded in relation to the second tranche of the financing. Each finder’s warrant entitles the holder to purchase, for a period of 24 months, one common share of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.15. The finder warrants were valued using a Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions: weighted average risk free interest rate of 1.23%, volatility factors of 101% and an expected life of 2 years. The total value ascribed to the finder's warrants warrants was $1,605.
In December, 2011 the Company completed a non-brokered private placement of flow-through units for gross proceeds of $767,750. A total of 5,905,769 units were issued at a price of Cdn$0.13 per unit. Each unit consists of one “flow-through” common share of the Company and one half of one common share purchase warrant. Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase, for a period of 18 months, one additional common share of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.20 per share. The share purchase warrants were valued using a Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions: weighted average risk free interest rate of 1.23%, volatility factors of 109% and an expected life of 2 years. The total value ascribed to the share purchase warrants was $117,359. A $NIL flow-through premium related to this private placement.
Finder’s fees of Cdn$49,920 and 383,999 finder’s warrants were awarded in relation to the flow-through financing. 269,230 of the finder’s warrants entitles the holder to purchase, for a period of 18 months, one additional common share of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.15 and 114,769 at a price of Cdn$0.20 for a period of 18 months. The finder warrants were valued using a Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions: weighted average risk free interest rate of 1.23%, volatility factors of 109% and an expected life of 1.5 years. The total value ascribed to the finder's warrants was $18,514.
The Shares issued in connection with these non-brokered private placements, including any issued on the exercise of the warrants, will be subject to a minimum hold period of four months.
Emgold Mining Corporation
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in United States Dollars)
7. Share Capital - continued
(a) Common shares, issued and fully paid - continued
Financing - continued
December 31, 2010
In April, 2010 the Company completed a non-brokered private placement raising gross proceeds of $750,000. A total of 3,000,000 units were issued at a price of $0.25 per unit. Each unit consists of one common share of the Company and one non-transferable share purchase warrant. Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase, for a period of 24 months, one additional common share of the Company at a price of $0.35. The shares and warrants issued in connection with this non-brokered private placement are subject to a minimum hold period of four months. Finder's fees of $76,797 and 192,000 finder’s warrants were awarded in relation to the first tranche of the financing. The finder’s warrants have the same terms as the warrants included in the units sold to purchasers except for an exercise price of $0.25. The finder's warrants and share purchase warrants were valued using a Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions: weighted average risk free interest rate of 1.78%, volatility factors of 89% and an expected life of 2 years. The total value ascribed to the finder’s warrants and share purchase warrants was $198,869.
On September 24, 2010, the Company completed a first tranche of a private placement, which comprised 5,203,856 units at a price of $0.14, comprising one common share and one warrant, exercisable for $0.35 for a period of 24 months. Finder's fees of $15,680 and 112,000 finder’s warrants were awarded in relation to the first tranche of the financing. The finder’s warrants have the same terms as the warrants included in the units sold to purchasers. The finder’s warrants and share purchase warrants were valued using a Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions: weighted average risk free interest rate of 1.35%, volatility factors of 94% and an expected life of 2 years. The total value ascribed to the finder’s warrants and share purchase warrants was $149,353.
On October 14, 2010, the Company closed the second and final tranche of the non-brokered private placement, of 7,296,142 units. Finder's fees of $75,673 and 540,491 finder's warrants were paid in relation to the second tranche of the financing. Each finder's warrant entitles its holder to purchase, for a period of 24 months, one additional common share of the Company at a price of US$0.35. In total, 12,499,998 units were issued at the price of $0.14 per unit to raise gross proceeds of approximately $1,750,000. The shares, the warrants, the finder’s warrants and any common shares issued on exercise of the warrants or the finder's warrants were subject to a minimum hold period of four months. The finder’s warrants and share purchase warrants were valued using a Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions: weighted average risk free interest rate of 1.35%, volatility factors of 92% and an expected life of 2 years. The total value ascribed to the finder’s warrants and share purchase warrants was $319,133.
Emgold Mining Corporation
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in United States Dollars)
7. Share Capital - continued
(a) Common shares, issued and fully paid - continued
Financing - continued
On December 22, 2010 the Company completed a non-brokered private placement financing of 2,272,727 flow-through units at a price of Cdn$0.22 per unit for gross proceeds of Cdn$500,000. Each unit consists of one flow-through common share and one-half of one transferable non-flow-through share purchase warrant, totaling 1,136,363 warrants. Each warrant is exercisable for a period of two years from the date of issue at a price of Cdn$0.30 per share. The proceeds will be used for exploration projects in British Columbia. Finder's fees of Cdn$35,000 and 159,090 finder's warrants were awarded in relation to the financing. Each finder's warrant entitles its holder to purchase, for a period of 2 years, one additional common share of the Company at a price of US$0.30. The Finder's Warrants and share purchase warrants were valued using a Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions: weighted average risk free interest rate of 1.38%, volatility factors of 99% and an expected life of 2 years. The total value ascribed to the finder's warrants and share purchase warrants was $103,022.
A finder’s fee of Cdn$35,000 was paid in association with this financing. In addition, the Company has issued 159,090 warrants to the finder, which will entitle the finder to acquire the number of common shares of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.23 per share at any time, subject to a hold period, and from time to time, on or before December 21, 2012.
(b) Stock options
The Company has a rolling stock option plan for its directors and employees to acquire common shares of the Company at a price determined by the fair market value of the shares at the date of grant. The maximum aggregate number of common shares reserved for issuance pursuant to the plan is 10% of the issued and outstanding common shares.
Emgold Mining Corporation
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in United States Dollars)
7. Share Capital - continued
| | | | | | | |
| | Number of Options | | Weighted Average Exercise Price (Cdn$) | |
Outstanding, December 31, 2010 | | | 3,113,998 | | $ | 1.37 | |
Expired | | | (65,500 | ) | $ | 0.175 | |
Cancelled and forfeited | | | (175,833 | ) | $ | 0.210 | |
Balance, December 31, 2011 and | | | | | | | |
March 31, 2012 | | | 2,872,665 | | $ | 0.23 | |
The following table summarizes information about the stock options outstanding at March 31, 2012:
| | |
Exercise Price (Cdn$) | Number Outstanding and Exercisable March 31, 2012 | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life |
$0.175 | 600,000 | 0.70 years |
$0.175 | 97,500 | 1.12 years |
$0.175 | 143,500 | 1.64 years |
$0.175 | 65,000 | 2.28 years |
$0.25 | 466,665 | 2.96 years |
$0.25 | 1,500,000 | 3.69 years |
| 2,872,665 | 2.73 years |
During the year ended December 31, 2011, a total of 405,700 incentive stock options granted to directors, officers, employees and consultants of the the Company with exercise prices ranging from Cdn$1.00 to Cdn$10.00 were repriced to $0.175 per share. The expiry dates, ranging from October 12, 2011 to July 12, 2014, remain unchanged.
Emgold Mining Corporation
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in United States Dollars)
7. Share Capital - continued
(b) Stock options - continued
For the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company incurred stock-based compensation expense of $Nil (2011 - $45,813, related to the re-pricing noted above) of which $Nil (2011- $13,166) is classified within exploration and evaluation costs.
The fair value of each stock option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model with weighted average assumptions as follows:
| | | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2012 | | March 31, 2011 | |
Risk-free interest rate | | | — | | | 1.68% | |
Expected life in years | | | — | | | 2.18 years | |
Expected volatility | | | — | | | 101% | |
Weighted average fair value per | | | | | | | |
option granted | | | — | | $ | 0.19 | |
The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that are fully transferable and have no vesting restrictions. The Company’s stock options are not transferable and cannot be traded, thus the Black-Scholes model may over-estimate the actual value of the options that the Company has granted. The Black-Scholes model also requires an estimate of expected volatility. The Company uses historical volatility rates of the Company to arrive at an estimate of expected volatility. Changes in the subjective input assumptions can impact the fair value estimate.
Emgold Mining Corporation
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in United States Dollars)
7. Share Capital - continued
(c) Warrants
As at March 31, 2012 the following share purchase warrants were outstanding:
Number of Warrants | | Exercise Price | Expiry Date |
| | | | |
| | | | |
1,600,000 | | $ | 0.35 | April 6, 2012 |
80,000 | | $ | 0.25 | April 6, 2012 |
1,400,000 | | $ | 0.35 | April 23, 2012 |
112,000 | | $ | 0.25 | April 23, 2012 |
5,315,856 | | $ | 0.35 | September 30, 2012 |
2,813,575 | | $ | 0.35 | September 9, 2015 |
7,836,633 | | $ | 0.35 | October 4, 2012 |
1,136,363 | | Cdn$ | 0.30 | December 21, 2012 |
159,090 | | Cdn$ | 0.22 | December 21, 2012 |
11,620,000 | | Cdn$ | 0.15 | November 21, 2013 |
536,000 | | Cdn$ | 0.15 | November 21, 2013 |
2,530,000 | | Cdn$ | 0.15 | December 21, 2013 |
32,000 | | Cdn$ | 0.15 | December 21, 2013 |
2,235,577 | | Cdn$ | 0.25 | June 22, 2013 |
269,230 | | Cdn$ | 0.15 | June 23, 2013 |
717,308 | | Cdn$ | 0.20 | June 28, 2013 |
114,769 | | Cdn$ | 0.20 | June 28, 2013 |
| | | | |
38,508,401 | | | | |
Emgold Mining Corporation
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in United States Dollars)
7. Share Capital - continued
(c) Warrants - continued
The following table summarizes warrant transactions for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010:
| | | | | | | |
| | Shares | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | |
Balance, December 31, 2009 | | | 861,500 | | $ | 1.12 | |
Issued | | | 20,453,517 | | $ | 0.35 | |
Balance, December 31, 2010 | | | 21,315,017 | | $ | 0.35 | |
Issued | | | 18,054,884 | | $ | 0.16 | |
Expired | | | (861,500 | ) | $ | 1.60 | |
Balance, December 31, 2011 | | | 38,508,401 | | $ | 0.27 | |
In accordance with IFRS, an obligation to issue shares for a price that is not fixed in the Company's functional currency, and that does not qualify as a rights offering, must be classified as a derivative liability and measured at fair value with changes recognized in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss as they arise. The Company has issued share purchase warrants (see note 9(a)) whereby the exercise price is denominated in $Cdn. As a result these share purchase warrants must be accounted for as a liability. As at March 31, 2012 the Company recorded a warrant liability in the amount of $771,000 (December 31, 2011 - $1,079,253). The warrants were valued upon issuance (see note 7(a)) and subsequently revalued on March 31, 2012 using a Black-Scholes option pricing model, using the following assumptions: weighted average risk free interest rate of 0.92%, volatility factors of 107% and an expected life of 1.55 years. An unrealized gain on warrant liability of $308,253 has been recorded on the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss for the three months ending March 31, 2012.
Emgold Mining Corporation
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in United States Dollars)
8. Related Party Transactions and Balances
| | | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2012 | | December 31, 2011 | |
Balance receivable from | | | | | | | |
Quorum Management (a) | | $ | 51,419 | | $ | 28,531 | |
Balances payable to | | | | | | | |
Directors and officers | | $ | 207,618 | | $ | 160,965 | |
Related party transactions reflected in these consolidated financial statements are as follows:
| (a) | In the three months ended March 31, 2012, $51,068 (2011 – 30,948) in management, administrative, geological and other services were provided by Quorum Management and Administrative Services Inc. (“Quorum”), a private company held jointly by the Company and other public companies, to provide services on a full cost recovery basis to the various public entities currently sharing certain personnel costs, office space, and overhead with the Company. Currently, the Company has a one/third interest in Quorum. The Company advanced three months of funds to Quorum for future services. Quorum held this advance as a deposit for each shareholder company as working capital. A distribution of income from Quorum in the three months ended March 31, 2012 resulted in a credit to Emgold in the amount of $6,894. Subsequent to March 31, 2012 the partners of Quorum made the decision to wind up its administrative operations effective August 1, 2012. Consequently, as a result of this decision, the company is exploring its options whether to have its administrative functions continue to be administered by another third party provider or to take the necessary steps to hire additional personnel to perform these functions. |
| (b) | Consulting fees of $10,519 (2011 – $10,593) were paid or are accrued and payable to 759924 Ontario Ltd., a private company controlled by a director. |
| (c) | Related party balances are non-interest bearing and are due on demand, with no fixed terms of repayment. Transactions with related parties are recorded at normal commercial terms. |
Emgold Mining Corporation
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in United States Dollars)
9. Supplementary Cash Flow Information - Non-Cash Transactions
| | | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2012 | | March 31, 2011 | |
Financing and investing activities | | | | | | | |
Shares issued for mineral property interests | | $ | 10,058 | | $ | 19,432 | |
Stock-based compensation | | | — | | | 45,813 | |
10. Management of Capital
The Company defines capital as its shareholders' equity. The Company’s objective in managing capital is to maintain adequate levels of funding to support permitting activities in California, maintain corporate and administrative functions necessary to support organizational management oversight, and obtain funding sufficient for advancing the Company’s other interests including the Buckskin Rawhide and Stewart properties.
The Company seeks to manage its capital structure in a manner that provides sufficient funding for operational activities. Funds are primarily secured through equity capital obtained in private placements. There can be no assurances that the Company will be able to continue raising capital in this manner. The Company currently does not use other sources of financing that require fixed payments of interest and principal due to the lack of cash flow from current operations and is not subject to any externally imposed capital requirements.
The Company has in the past invested its capital in short-term investments to obtain adequate returns. The investment decision is based on cash management to ensure working capital is available to meet the Company’s short-term obligations while maximizing liquidity and returns of unused capital.
Although the Company has been successful at raising funds in the past through the issuance of share capital, it is uncertain whether it will be able to continue this form of financing due to the current difficult conditions. The Company currently does not have sufficient funds to complete its permitting activities, and will need to rely on equity financing's, or forms of joint venture or other types of financing to continue the permitting process and commence exploration work and to meet its administrative overhead costs for the coming year. Additional information relating to management of capital is disclosed in note 1.
Emgold Mining Corporation
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in United States Dollars)
11. Financial Instruments and Risk Management
The Company's activities expose it to a variety of financial risks: credit risk, liquidity risk and market risk (including interest rate, foreign currency risk and commodity and equity price risk).
Risk management is carried out by the Company's management team with guidance from the Audit Committee under policies approved by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors also provides regular guidance for overall risk management.
Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Company if a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet its obligations. The Company’s maximum exposure to credit risk at the statement of financial position date under its financial instruments is summarized as follows:
| | | | |
| | | March 31, 2012 | |
Accounts and other receivables | | | | |
Currently due | | $ | 19,678 | |
Past due by 90 days or less not impaired | | | — | |
Past due by greater than 90 days not impaired | | | — | |
| | | 19,678 | |
Cash | | | 163,402 | |
| | $ | 183,080 | |
Substantially all of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents are held with major financial institutions in Canada, and management believes the exposure to credit risk with such institutions is not significant. Those financial assets that potentially subject the Company to credit risk are its receivables. The Company has increased its focus on credit risk given the impact of the current economic climate. The Company considers the risk of material loss to be significantly mitigated due to the financial strength of the major financial institutions where cash and term deposits are held. As at March 31, 2012 the Company did not hold any cash equivalents. The Company’s maximum exposure to credit risk as at March 31, 2012, is the carrying value of its financial assets.
Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its obligations associated with financial liabilities. The Company has a planning and budgeting process in place by which it anticipates and determines the funds required to support normal operation requirements as well as the growth and development of its mineral property interests. The Company coordinates this planning and budgeting process with its financing activities through the capital management process described in note 10, in normal circumstances. Due to the lack of liquidity and anticipated working capital requirements within the next twelve months, management has increased its focus on liquidity risk given the impact of the current economic climate on the availability of finance. Further to this the Company is committed to spend $Cdn767,750 on Canadian qualifying exploration expenditures by December 31, 2012. Further information regarding liquidity risk is set out in note 1.
Emgold Mining Corporation
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in United States Dollars)
11. Financial Instruments and Risk Management - continued
Liquidity risk - continued
The Company’s financial liabilities are comprised of its accounts payable and accrued liabilities and amounts due to related parties, the contractual maturities of which at March 31, 2012, are summarized as follows:
| | | | |
| | March 31, 2012 | |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities with contractual maturities - | | | | |
Within 90 days or less | | $ | 270,761 | |
Due to related parties with contractual maturities | | | | |
Within 90 days or less | | | 207,618 | |
| | $ | 391,199 | |
Interest rate risk
The Company has no significant exposure at December 31, 2011, to interest rate risk through its financial instruments.
Price risk
The Company is exposed to price risk with respect to commodity and equity prices. Commodity price risk is defined as the potential adverse impact on earnings and economic value due to commodity price movements and volatilities. Commodity price risk is remote since the Company is not a producing entity. Equity price risk is defined as the potential adverse impact on the Company’s earnings due to movements in individual equity prices or general movements in the level of the stock market. The Company closely monitors individual equity movements and the stock market to determine the appropriate course of action to be taken by the Company.
The Company’s marketable securities consist of equity investments in one publicly listed entity. Based on management’s knowledge and experience of the financial markets, the Company believes the following movements are “reasonably possible” over a twelve month period:
(i) A variance of 100% in the market value of the Company’s marketable securities would affect loss and comprehensive loss by $16,627.
Currency risk
The Company’s currency risk arises primarily with fluctuations in United States dollar and the Canadian dollar. The Company has no revenue and any exposure to currency risk is related to expenditures by the Company in Canada, as a significant portion of operating expenses are payable in Canadian dollars. The currency risk of the Company relates to unpaid liabilities of the Company payable in Canadian dollars.
Emgold Mining Corporation
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in United States Dollars)
11. Financial Instruments and Risk Management - continued
Currency risk - continued
The Company has not hedged its exposure to currency fluctuations. At March 31, 2012, the Company is exposed to currency risk through the following assets and liabilities denominated in Canadian dollars, but presented in United States dollar equivalents.
| | | | |
| | March 31, 2012 | |
Canadian dollars | | | | |
Cash and short term investments | | $ | 616,147 | |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | $ | (144,046 | ) |
Based on the above net exposures at March 31, 2012, and assuming that all other variables remain constant a 10% appreciation or depreciation of the Canadian dollar against the United States dollar would result in an increase/decrease of $47,200 in the Company’s consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss.
Emgold Mining Corporation
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in United States Dollars)
12. | Exploration and Evaluation Costs |
| | Three months ended March 31, | | Cumulative Total of March 31, | |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | |
Idaho - Maryland Property, California | | | | | | | | | | |
Assay and analysis | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 100,140 | |
Community relations | | | — | | | — | | | 80,561 | |
Drilling | | | — | | | — | | | 1,039,920 | |
Geological and geochemical | | | 78,001 | | | 78,480 | | | 4,775,549 | |
Land lease and taxes | | | 40,493 | | | 43,219 | | | 1,700,599 | |
Consulting | | | — | | | — | | | 209,713 | |
Mine planning | | | 25,709 | | | 70,942 | | | 4,767,542 | |
Site activities | | | — | | | — | | | 1,672,390 | |
Stock-based compensation | | | — | | | 13,166 | | | 599,943 | |
Transportation | | | — | | | — | | | 128,250 | |
Incurred during the period | | | 144,203 | | | 205,807 | | | 15,097,732 | |
Buckskin Rawhide and Koegel Properties, Nevada | | | | | | | | | | |
Geological and geochemical | | | 3,210 | | | 1,359 | | | 31,375 | |
Site activities | | | — | | | — | | | 5,116 | |
Incurred during the period | | | 3,210 | | | 1,359 | | | 36,491 | |
Rozan Gold Property, British Columbia | | | | | | | | | | |
Assay and analysis | | | — | | | — | | | 11,803 | |
Geological and geochemical | | | 2,469 | | | — | | | 125,857 | |
Drilling | | | — | | | — | | | 64,050 | |
Site activities | | | — | | | — | | | 22,044 | |
Stock-based compensation | | | — | | | — | | | 16,055 | |
Trenching | | | — | | | — | | | 4,666 | |
Transportation | | | — | | | — | | | 12,354 | |
Assistance and recovery | | | — | | | | | | (7,322 | ) |
Incurred during the year | | | 2,469 | | | — | | | 249,507 | |
Emgold Mining Corporation
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in United States Dollars)
12. | Exploration and Evaluation Costs - continued |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Stewart Property, British Columbia | | | | | | | | | | |
Assay and analysis | | | — | | | — | | | 156,712 | |
Drilling | | | — | | | — | | | 851,143 | |
Geological and geochemical | | | 10,220 | | | 5,129 | | | 333,212 | |
Site activities | | | 355 | | | — | | | 31,701 | |
Stock-based compensation | | | — | | | — | | | 16,055 | |
Trenching | | | — | | | — | | | 19,318 | |
Transportation | | | — | | | — | | | 56,061 | |
Assistance and recovery | | | — | | | — | | | (29,692 | ) |
Incurred during the year | | | 10,575 | | | 5,129 | | | 1,434,510 | |
Total exploration costs | | $ | 160,457 | | $ | 212,295 | | $ | 16,795,115 | |
In April, 2012 the partners of Quorum made the decision to wind up its administrative operations effective August 1, 2012. Consequently, as a result of this decision, the company is exploring its options whether to have its administrative functions continue to be administered by another third party provider or to take the necessary steps to hire additional personnel to perform these functions.
On May 22, 2012 the Company appointed Mr. Andrew MacRitchie, C.A. as an independent Director of the Company. Mr. MacRitchie will also serve as Chairman of Emgold’s Audit Committee.