Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2014 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |
Consolidation, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Principles of Consolidation |
|
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain amounts in the consolidated financial statements and notes for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation. These reclassifications had no impact on the previously reported net income, other comprehensive income, total assets or total liabilities. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Use of Estimates |
|
The preparation of the Company’s financial statements, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions affecting the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Although the Company based the estimates and assumptions on historical experience, when available, market information, and on various other factors that the Company believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, management exercises significant judgment in the final determination of the estimates. Actual results may differ from these estimates. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Cash Equivalents |
|
Cash equivalents include demand deposits with banks, money market accounts and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less that are not held for sale in the ordinary course of business. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, approximately 99% and 89%, respectively, of the Company’s cash equivalents were invested in money market funds that invest primarily in U.S. Treasuries and other securities backed by the U.S. government. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Marketable Securities, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Financial Instruments |
|
MBS transactions are recorded as purchases and sales on the date the securities are settled unless the transaction qualifies as a regular-way trade, in which case the transactions are accounted for as purchases or sales on a trade date basis. Any amounts payable or receivable for unsettled trades are recorded as “sold securities receivable” or “purchased securities payable” in the consolidated balance sheets. |
|
Investments in MBS and marketable equity securities, if any, are classified as either available-for-sale or trading investments pursuant to accounting principles related to accounting for certain investments in debt and equity securities. These investments are carried at fair value with resulting unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the consolidated balance sheets and unrealized gains and losses on trading securities reflected in investment gain (loss), net, in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. Investments in equity securities of non-public companies are carried at cost. |
|
Although the Company generally intends to hold its MBS until maturity, it may, from time to time, sell any of its MBS as part of the overall management of its business. The available-for-sale designation provides the Company with the flexibility to sell its MBS in order to act on potential market opportunities or changes in economic conditions to ensure future liquidity and to meet other general corporate purposes as they arise. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Impairments [Policy Text Block] | Impairments |
|
The Company evaluates available-for-sale securities for other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) charges at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. In general, when the fair value of an available-for-sale security is less than its amortized cost at the reporting date, the security is considered impaired. In evaluating these available-for-sale securities for OTTI charges, consideration is given to (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been lower than carrying value, (2) the severity of the decline in fair value, (3) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, (4) the Company’s intent to sell, and (5) whether it is more-likely-than-not the Company would be required to sell the security before anticipated recovery. |
|
If the Company intends to sell an impaired security, or it is more-likely-than-not that it will be required to sell the impaired security before its anticipated recovery, then the Company must recognize OTTI charges through earnings equal to the entire difference between the investment security’s amortized cost and its fair value at the reporting date. If the Company does not expect to sell an other-than-temporarily impaired security, only the portion of the OTTI related to credit losses is recognized through charges to earnings with the remainder recognized through other accumulated comprehensive income/(loss) on the consolidated balance sheet. Impairments recognized through other comprehensive income/(loss) do not impact earnings. Following the recognition of an OTTI through earnings, a new cost basis is established for the investment security and may not be adjusted for subsequent recoveries in fair value through earnings. However, OTTI recognized through charges to earnings may be accreted back to the amortized cost basis of the investment security on a prospective basis through interest income. The determination as to whether an OTTI exists and, if so, the amount of credit impairment recognized in earnings is subjective, as such determination is based on factual information available at the time of assessment as well as the Company’s estimates of the future performance and cash flow projections. As a result, the timing and amount of OTTIs constitute material estimates that are susceptible to significant change. |
|
For available-for-sale, agency-backed MBS, if it is determined that the impairment is other-than- temporary, then the amount that the fair value is below its amortized cost basis is recorded as an impairment charge and recorded through the Company’s earnings. For unrealized losses that are determined to be temporary, a further evaluation is performed to determine the credit portion of the OTTI and the credit portion is recorded through the Company’s statement of comprehensive income. |
|
For available-for-sale, private-label MBS securities that have been acquired at discounts to face value due in part to credit deterioration since origination, the Company re-evaluates the undiscounted expected future cash flows and the changes in cash flows from those originally projected at the time of purchase or when last revised. The discount rate used to calculate the present value of expected future cash flows is the current yield used for income recognition purposes as compared to the discount rate used to calculate the fair value of the investment security is the current expected market rate. For those securities in an unrealized loss position, the difference between the carrying value and the net present value of expected future cash flows is recorded as OTTI charges through the Company’s statement of comprehensive income. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
|
The accounting principles related to fair value measurements define fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date, not adjusted for transaction costs. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820), establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels giving the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3) as described below: |
|
| Level 1 Inputs — | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that are accessible by the Company; | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| Level 2 Inputs — | Quoted prices in markets that are not active or financial instruments for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly; and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| Level 3 Inputs — | Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, including significant assumptions of the Company and other market participants. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
The Company determines fair values for the following assets and liabilities: |
|
Mortgage-backed securities (MBS), at fair value — |
|
Agency-backed MBS — The Company’s mortgage-backed securities (MBS), the principal and interest payments on which are guaranteed by the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) (collectively, agency-backed MBS), are generally classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy as they are valued after considering quoted market prices provided by a broker or dealer, or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. The Company reviews broker or pricing service quotes to determine whether the quotes are relevant, for example, whether an active market exists to provide price transparency or whether the quote is an indicative price or a binding offer. The independent brokers and dealers providing market prices are those who make markets in or specialists with expertise in the valuation of these financial instruments. |
|
Private-label MBS — The Company classifies non-agency-backed, or private-label, MBS within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy because they trade infrequently and, therefore, have little or no price transparency. The Company utilizes present value techniques based on estimated cash flows of the instrument taking into consideration various assumptions derived by management and other assumptions used by other market participants. These assumptions are corroborated by evidence such as historical data, risk characteristics, transactions in similar instruments, and completed or pending transactions, when available. The significant inputs in the Company’s valuation process include default rate, loss severity, prepayment rate and discount rate. In general, significant increases (decreases) in default rate, loss severity or discount rate, in isolation, would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement. However, significant increases (decreases) in prepayment rate may result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement. It is difficult to generalize the interrelationships between these significant inputs as the actual results could differ considerably on an individual security basis. For example, an increase in the default rate may not increase the loss severity rate if actual losses are lower than the average. Also, changes in discount rates may be greatly influenced by market expectation at any given point based upon many variables not directly related to the MBS market. Therefore, each significant input is closely analyzed to ascertain the reasonableness for the Company’s valuation purposes. |
|
Establishing fair value is inherently subjective given the volatile and sometimes illiquid markets for these private-label MBS and requires management to make a number of assumptions, including assumptions about the future of interest rates, prepayment rates, discount rates, credit loss rates, and the timing of cash flows and credit losses. The assumptions the Company applies are specific to each security. Although the Company relies on its internal calculations to compute the fair value of these private-label MBS, the Company requests and considers indications of value, or the mark, from third-party dealers and the actual sales of private-label MBS to assist in the valuation process and calibrate the Company’s model. |
|
Other investments — The Company’s other investments, which are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, consist of investments in equity securities, investment funds and other MBS-related securities, such as interest-only MBS. |
|
Derivative instruments — In the normal course of the Company’s operations, the Company is a party to various financial instruments that are accounted for as derivatives in accordance with ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging (ASC 815). The derivative instruments that trade in active markets or exchanges are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices. Other derivative instruments are generally classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using broker or dealer quotations, which are model-based calculations based on market-based inputs, including, but not limited to, contractual terms, market prices, yield curves, credit curves, measures of volatility, prepayment rates and correlations of such inputs. |
|
Other — Cash and cash equivalents, interest receivable, deposits, other receivable, interest payable, accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities are reflected in the consolidated balance sheets at their amortized cost (which approximates fair value because of the short term nature of these instruments) and classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy, except for certain cash equivalents that are held in money market funds that are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. |
|
Sold securities receivable, repurchase agreements and purchased securities payable are reflected in the consolidated balance sheets at the cost basis, which approximates fair value because of the short term nature of these instruments, and classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. |
|
Long-term debt represents remaining balances of trust preferred debt and senior debt issued by the Company. Trust preferred debt is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy as the fair value is determined after considering quoted market prices provided by a broker or dealer. The independent brokers or dealers providing market prices are those who make markets in or specialists with expertise in the valuation of these financial instruments. The Company’s senior debt, which is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange, is classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. |
|
The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments are as follows: |
|
| | December 31, 2014 | | December 31, 2013 | | | | | | | |
| | | | Estimated Fair | | | | Estimated | | | | | | | |
| | Carrying Amount | | Value | | Carrying Amount | | Fair Value | | | | | | | |
Financial assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 33,832 | | $ | 33,832 | | $ | 48,628 | | $ | 48,628 | | | | | | | |
Interest receivable | | | 10,701 | | | 10,701 | | | 5,173 | | | 5,173 | | | | | | | |
Other receivables | | | 1,138 | | | 1,138 | | | 212 | | | 212 | | | | | | | |
MBS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Agency-backed MBS | | | 3,414,340 | | | 3,414,340 | | | 1,576,499 | | | 1,576,499 | | | | | | | |
Private-label MBS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Senior securities | | | — | | | — | | | 7,066 | | | 7,066 | | | | | | | |
Re-REMIC securities | | | 267,437 | | | 267,437 | | | 334,233 | | | 334,233 | | | | | | | |
Derivative assets | | | 1,267 | | | 1,267 | | | 8,424 | | | 8,424 | | | | | | | |
Other investments | | | 1,837 | | | 1,837 | | | 2,065 | | | 2,065 | | | | | | | |
Deposits | | | 160,427 | | | 160,427 | | | 45,504 | | | 45,504 | | | | | | | |
Financial liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Repurchase agreements | | | 3,179,775 | | | 3,179,775 | | | 1,547,630 | | | 1,547,630 | | | | | | | |
Interest payable | | | 1,106 | | | 1,106 | | | 774 | | | 774 | | | | | | | |
Long-term debt | | | 40,000 | | | 39,200 | | | 40,000 | | | 36,620 | | | | | | | |
Derivative liabilities | | | 124,308 | | | 124,308 | | | 33,129 | | | 33,129 | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities | | | 1,006 | | | 1,006 | | | 1,391 | | | 1,391 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Repurchase Agreements, Collateral, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Repurchase Agreements |
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase, which are treated as financing transactions for financial reporting purposes, are collateralized by MBS and are carried at their contractual amounts, including accrued interest, as specified in the respective agreements. Under the repurchase agreements, the Company pledges its securities as collateral to secure the borrowing, which is equal in value to a specified percentage of the fair value of the pledged collateral, while the Company retains beneficial ownership of the pledged collateral. At the maturity of a repurchase financing, the Company is required to repay the borrowing and receives back its pledged collateral from the counterparty. The counterparty to the repurchase agreements may require that the Company pledge additional securities or cash as additional collateral to secure borrowings when the value of the collateral declines. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest Income [Policy Text Block] | Interest Income and Purchase Premiums and Discounts on MBS Securities |
|
Interest income includes contractual coupon payments and the amortization of purchase premiums and accretion of discounts, if any, on the available-for-sale MBS portfolio. Interest income also includes contractual coupon payments on the trading MBS portfolio. Purchase premiums or discounts, if any, on the trading MBS portfolio are accounted for under mark-to-market accounting and the changes in value are recorded in investment gain (loss), net, on the statement of comprehensive income. |
|
Interest income on the private-label MBS that were purchased at a discount to face value is recognized based on the security’s expected effective interest rate. At acquisition, the accretable yield is calculated as the difference between the undiscounted expected cash flows and the purchase price which is expected to be accreted into interest income over the remaining life of the security on a level-yield basis. The difference between the contractually required payments and the undiscounted expected cash flows represents the non-accretable difference. Based on actual payment activities and changes in estimates of undiscounted expected future cash flows, the accretable yield and the non-accretable difference can change over time. Significant increases in the amount or timing of undiscounted expected future cash flows are recognized prospectively as an adjustment to the accretable yield. As a result, the Company may recognize higher non-cash interest income over the security’s holding period and may not realize the level of interest income recognized using the higher accretion rates. In addition, the Company may be subject to more frequent and higher non-cash OTTI charges than actual losses realized on the security as a result. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Share-based Compensation, Option and Incentive Plans Policy [Policy Text Block] | Stock-Based Compensation |
|
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with accounting principles related to share-based payment which requires fair value method of accounting. Under the fair value based method, compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and is recognized over the service period, which is usually the vesting period. Expected forfeitures are included in determining share-based employee compensation cost. Share-based awards that do not require future services are expensed immediately. |
|
Depending on the Company’s stock price at the time restricted stock units vest, the actual tax deduction benefit may be more or less than the carrying amount of the previously recorded deferred tax asset. An increase to the tax benefit (windfall) is generated when the tax deduction exceeds the recorded deferred tax asset. This incremental excess tax benefits are recorded as an increase to additional paid-in capital. Conversely, a decrease in tax benefit (shortfall) is generated when the tax deduction is below the recorded deferred tax asset. These incremental expense results in additional income tax expense, unless it can be offset by accumulated windfall tax benefit recorded in additional paid-in capital. The gross windfall tax benefit is presented in the consolidated statements of cash flows as financing cash inflows. |
|
Performance-Based Long-Term Incentive Program |
|
On August 13, 2012, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (the Compensation Committee) adopted a performance-based long-term incentive program (Performance-based Program) that provides for the issuance of two types of performance share units (PSUs). |
|
The Compensation Committee established performance goals under the Performance-based Program. Two types of PSUs may be awarded under the Performance-based Program: Book Value PSUs and Total Shareholder Return Units (TSR PSUs). The Book Value PSUs are eligible to vest based on the compound annualized growth in the Company’s book value per share (i.e., book value change with such adjustments as determined and approved by the Compensation Committee plus dividends on a reinvested basis) during the applicable performance period. The TSR PSUs are eligible to vest based on the Company’s compound annualized total shareholder return (i.e., share price change plus dividends on a reinvested basis) during the applicable performance period. |
|
The Company accounts for the Performance-based Program in accordance with ASC 718. Therefore, the Book Value PSUs are valued at the grant date market value and the estimated compensation cost is recorded over the vesting period. The Company estimates the number of shares to be issued under the Book Value PSUs on a quarterly basis based on the actual and projected results for the remaining vesting period and any adjustments required are recognized retrospectively and over the remaining vesting period. |
|
The TSR PSUs are also valued at the time of grant based on valuation model and the estimated compensation cost is recorded over the vesting period using straight-line basis. The valuation of the TSR PSUs is performed using Monte-Carlo simulation model (Model) using various assumptions including beginning average price, expected volatility, dividend equivalents, dividend yield, and risk-free rate of return. The Model projects stock prices on a daily basis assuming 250 trading days per year. The Model generates many future stock price paths to construct a distribution of where future stock prices might be. No remeasurement of compensation expense is required for the TSR PSUs. |
|
The compensation costs are reversed if an employee is terminated prior to completing the required service period. The estimated shares to be granted under the Performance-based Program are included in the calculation of diluted Earnings Per Share. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income Tax, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Income Taxes |
|
Income taxes are provided for using the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities represent the differences between the financial statement and income tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates. The measurement of net deferred tax assets is adjusted by a valuation allowance if, based on the Company’s evaluation, it is more-likely-than-not that they will not be realized. The Company recognizes tax positions in the financial statements only when it is more-likely-than-not that the position will be sustained upon examination by the relevant taxing authority based on the technical merits of the position. A position that meets this standard is measured at the largest amount of benefit that will more-likely-than-not be realized upon settlement. A liability is established for differences between positions taken in a tax return and the financial statements. |
|
The Company is subject to federal alternative minimum tax (AMT) and state and local taxes on its taxable income and gains that are not offset by the net operating loss (NOL) and net capital loss (NCL) carry-forwards. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive Income, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Other Comprehensive Income |
|
Comprehensive income includes net income as currently reported by the Company on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income adjusted for other comprehensive income. Other comprehensive income for the Company represents changes in unrealized gains and losses related to the Company’s MBS and other mortgage related assets accounted for as available-for-sale with changes in fair value recorded through shareholders’ equity. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings Per Share, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Earnings Per Share |
|
Basic earnings per share includes no dilution and is computed by dividing net income or loss available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the respective period. Diluted earnings per share includes the impact of dilutive securities such as stock options, unvested shares of restricted stock and performance share units. The following table presents the computations of basic and diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012: |
|
| | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 | |
| | Basic | | Diluted | | Basic | | Diluted | | Basic | | Diluted | |
Weighted average shares outstanding Common stock (in thousands) | | | 20,043 | | | 20,043 | | | 15,990 | | | 15,990 | | | 10,205 | | | 10,205 | |
Stock options, performance share units, and unvested restricted stock (in thousands) | | | — | | | 354 | | | — | | | 199 | | | — | | | 37 | |
Weighted average common and common equivalent shares outstanding (in thousands) | | | 20,043 | | | 20,397 | | | 15,990 | | | 16,189 | | | 10,205 | | | 10,242 | |
Net income applicable to common stock | | $ | 5,954 | | $ | 5,954 | | $ | 49,461 | | $ | 49,461 | | $ | 183,942 | | $ | 183,942 | |
Net income per common share | | $ | 0.3 | | $ | 0.29 | | $ | 3.09 | | $ | 3.06 | | $ | 18.02 | | $ | 17.96 | |
|
There were no outstanding options to purchase shares of common stock at December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012. The diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 did not include the antidilutive effect of 42,570, 26,218 and 27,808 shares, respectively, of awarded restricted stock units, stock options, and restricted stock. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
|
On April 10, 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-08, Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity, which changes the criteria for determining which disposals can be presented as discontinued operations and modifies related disclosure requirements. This standard was effective for the Company on January 1, 2015. The Company does not expect significant impact to the financial statements upon implementation of ASU No. 2014-08. |
|
On May 28, 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. ASU No. 2014-09 will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective. The new standard will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2017. Early application is not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU No. 2014-09. |
|
On August 27, 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements — Going Concern (subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern, which is intended to define management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. This standard will be effective for the Company for the year ending on December 31, 2016. Early application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU No. 2014-15. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |