The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Notes) | 6 Months Ended |
Jun. 30, 2014 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | ' |
The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | ' |
The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
The Company |
Proofpoint, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in Delaware in June 2002 and is headquartered in California. |
Proofpoint is a pioneering security-as-a-service ("SaaS") vendor that enables large and mid-sized organizations through out the world to defend, protect, archive and govern their most sensitive data. The Company’s SaaS platform is comprised of a number of data protection solutions, including threat protection, regulatory compliance, archiving and governance, and secure communication. |
Basis of Presentation and Consolidation |
The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and condensed footnotes have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) for a fair statement of results for the interim periods presented have been included. The results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ended December 31, 2014 or for other interim periods or for future years. |
The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2013 is derived from audited financial statements as of that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. These accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Company's 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
There have been no material changes to the Company's significant accounting policies described in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, including those described below. |
Use of Estimates |
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates and such difference may be material to the financial statements. |
Goodwill and Intangible Assets |
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of the acquired enterprise over the fair value of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The Company applies ASC 350, "Intangibles—Goodwill and Other" and performs an annual goodwill impairment test during the fourth quarter of the Company's fiscal year and more frequently if an event or circumstances indicates that an impairment may have occurred. For the purposes of impairment testing, the Company has determined that it has one reporting unit. The Company performs a two-step impairment test of goodwill whereby the fair value of the reporting unit is compared to its carrying value. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds the carrying value of the net assets assigned to that unit, goodwill is not considered impaired and further testing is not required. If the carrying value of the net assets assigned to the reporting unit exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, then the Company must perform the second step of the impairment test in order to determine the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill. If the carrying value of a reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, then an impairment loss equal to the difference is recorded. The identification and measurement of goodwill impairment involves the estimation of the fair value of the Company. The estimate of fair value of the Company, based on the best information available as of the date of the assessment, is subjective and requires judgment, including management assumptions about expected future revenue forecasts and discount rates, changes in the overall economy, trends in the stock price and other factors. No impairment was identified by the Company as of June 30, 2014. |
|
Intangible assets consist of developed technology, vendor relationships and customer relationships. The values assigned to intangibles are based on estimates and judgments regarding expectations for success and life cycle of solutions and technologies acquired. |
|
Intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated lives, which approximate the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible assets are consumed, as follows (in years): |
|
|
| | | |
| Low | | High |
Patents | 4 | | 5 |
Developed technology | 3 | | 7 |
Customer relationships | 2 | | 5 |
Non-compete agreements | 2 | | 4 |
Tradenames and trademarks | 1 | | 5 |
|
Revenue Recognition |
The Company derives its revenue primarily from two sources: (1) subscription revenue for rights related to the use of the security-as-a-service platform and (2) hardware, training and professional services revenue provided to customers related to their use of the platform. Subscription revenue is derived from a subscription‑based enterprise licensing model with contract terms typically ranging from one to three years, and consists of (i) subscription fees from the licensing of the security-as-a-service platform, (ii) subscription fees for access to the on-demand elements of the platform and (iii) subscription fees for the right to access the Company’s customer support services. |
|
The Company applies the provision of ASC 985-605, “Software Revenue Recognition” and related interpretations, to all transactions involving the licensing of software, as well as related support, training, and other professional services. ASC 985-605 requires revenue earned on software arrangements involving multiple elements such as software license, support, training and other professional services to be allocated to each element based on the relative fair values of these elements. The fair value of an element must be based on vendor‑specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of fair value. VSOE of fair value of each element is based on the price charged when the element is sold separately. Revenue is recognized when all of the following criteria are met as set forth in ASC 985-605: |
|
| | | |
• | Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, | | |
| | | |
• | Delivery has occurred, | | |
| | | |
• | The fee is fixed or determinable, and | | |
| | | |
• | Collectability is probable. | | |
The Company has analyzed all of the elements included in its multiple element arrangements and has determined that it does not have sufficient VSOE of fair value to allocate revenue to its subscription and software license agreements, support, training, and professional services. The Company defers all revenue under the software arrangement until the commencement of the subscription services and any associated professional services. Once the subscription services and the associated professional services have commenced, the entire fee from the arrangement is recognized ratably over the remaining period of the arrangement. If the professional services are essential to the functionality of the subscription, then the revenue recognition does not commence until such services are completed. |
In the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, revenue is categorized as "subscription" and "hardware and services." Although the Company is unable to separate its multiple elements under the applicable revenue recognition guidance since it does not have sufficient VSOE of fair value for revenue recognition purposes, the Company has used a systematic and rational estimate to classify revenue between subscription and hardware and services. For presentation purposes only, the Company allocates revenue to hardware and services based upon management's best estimate of fair value of such deliverables using a cost plus model. The remaining consideration of the arrangement is then allocated to subscription revenue. Management believes that this methodology provides a reasonable basis to allocate revenue between "subscription" and "hardware and services" for presentation purposes. |
The hosted on-demand service agreements do not provide customers with the right to take possession of the software supporting the hosted service. The Company recognizes revenue from its hosted on-demand services in accordance with ASC 605-20, and as such recognizes revenue when the following criteria are met: |
| | | |
• | Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, | | |
| | | |
• | Delivery of the Company’s obligations to its customers has occurred, | | |
| | | |
• | Collection of the fees is probable, and | | |
| | | |
• | The amount of fees to be paid by the customer is fixed or determinable. | | |
In October 2009, the FASB amended the accounting guidance for multiple element arrangements (“ASU 2009-13”) to: |
| | | |
• | Provide updated guidance on whether multiple deliverables exist, how the deliverables in an arrangement should be separated, and how the arrangement consideration should be allocated among its elements; | | |
| | | |
• | Require an entity to allocate revenue in an arrangement that has separate units of accounting using best estimated selling price (“BESP”) of deliverables if a vendor does not have VSOE of fair value or third-party evidence of selling price (“TPE”), and | | |
| | | |
• | Eliminate the use of the residual method and require an entity to allocate revenue using the relative selling price method to the separate unit of accounting. | | |
Concurrently, the FASB amended the accounting guidance for revenue recognition (“ASU 2009-14”) to exclude hardware appliances containing software components and hardware components that function together to deliver the hardware appliance’s essential functionality from the scope of the software revenue recognition guidance of ASC 985-605. |
For all arrangements within the scope of these new accounting pronouncements, including the Company’s hosted on-demand services, the Company evaluates each element in a multiple element arrangement to determine whether it represents a separate unit of accounting. An element constitutes a separate unit of accounting when the delivered item has standalone value and delivery of the undelivered element is probable and within the Company’s control. Revenue derived from the licensing of the security-as-a-service platform continues to be accounted for in accordance with the industry specific revenue recognition guidance. |
Hardware appliance revenue is recognized upon shipment. Subscription and support revenue are recognized over the contract period commencing on the start date of the contract. Professional services and training, when sold with hardware appliances or subscription and support services, are accounted for separately when those services have standalone value and are recognized when delivered. In determining whether professional services and training services can be accounted for separately from subscription and support services, the Company considers the following factors: availability of the services from other vendors, the nature of the services, and the dependence of the subscription services on the customer’s decision to buy the professional services. If professional services and training do not qualify for separate accounting, the Company recognizes the professional services and training ratably over the contract term of the subscription services. |
Delivery generally occurs when the hardware appliance is delivered to a common carrier freight on board shipping point by the Company or the hosted service has been activated and communicated to the customer accordingly. The Company’s fees are typically considered to be fixed or determinable at the inception of an arrangement and are negotiated at the outset of an arrangement, generally based on specific products and quantities to be delivered. In the event payment terms are provided that differ significantly from the Company's standard business practices, the fees are deemed to not be fixed or determinable and revenue is recognized as the fees become paid. |
The Company assesses collectability based on a number of factors, including credit worthiness of the customer and past transaction history of the customer. Through June 30, 2014, the Company has not experienced significant credit losses. |
Deferred Revenue |
Deferred revenue primarily consists of billings or payments received in advance of revenue recognition from the sale of the Company’s subscription fees, training and professional services. Once the revenue recognition criteria are met, this revenue is recognized ratably over the term of the associated contract. |
Comprehensive Loss |
|
Comprehensive loss includes all changes in equity that are not the result of transactions with stockholders. The Company’s comprehensive loss consists of its net loss and changes in unrealized gains (losses) from its available-for-sale investments. Total comprehensive loss has been presented in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss. The Company had no significant reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive loss into net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013. |
Recent Accounting Policies |
In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-12, "Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period", a new accounting standard update that clarifies the accounting for share-based payments when the terms of an award allow for a performance target to be achieved after an employee completes the requisite period. The amendments require that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite period be treated as a performance condition. A company should apply existing guidance in Topic 718 as it relates to awards with performance conditions that affect vesting to account for such awards. Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attribute to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. The new guidance will become effective for the Company on January 1, 2016. Early adoption is permitted and the Company is currently assessing the impact on its consolidated financial statements. |
|
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers", a new accounting standard update jointly issued with the IASB on revenue recognition. The new guidance provides a single, comprehensive revenue recognition model for all contracts with customers to improve comparability within industries, across industries and across capital markets. Companies are required by the standard to recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled to in an exchange for those goods and services. The new guidance will become effective for the Company on January 1, 2017. Early adoption is not permitted and the Company is currently assessing the impact on its consolidated financial statements. |
|
In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-11, "Income Taxes", a new accounting standard update on the financial statement presentation of unrecognized tax benefits. The new guidance provides that a liability related to an unrecognized tax benefit would be presented as a reduction of a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss or a tax credit carryforward if such settlement is required or expected in the event the uncertain tax position is disallowed. The new guidance became effective for the Company on January 1, 2014 and had no material impact to the Company's financial statements. |