UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Check one
| | |
[x] | | Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
| | for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 or |
| | |
[ ] | | Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
Commission file number 000-50160
HECHINGER LIQUIDATION TRUST
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
| | |
Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) | | 52-7230151 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| | |
1801 McCormick Drive, Largo, Maryland (Address of principal executive offices) | | 20774 (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (301) 883-4501
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [x] No [ ]
Indicate by mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes [ ] No [x]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.
Yes [x] No [ ]
HECHINGER LIQUIDATION TRUST
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2004
| | | | |
Description
| | Page
|
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: | | | | |
| | | | |
Item 1. Financial Statements | | | | |
Unaudited Statements of Net Assets in Liquidation | | | 3 | |
Unaudited Statements of Changes in Net Assets in Liquidation | | | 4 | |
Unaudited Statements of Cash Receipts and Disbursements | | | 5 | |
Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements | | | 6 | |
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | | | 12 | |
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | | | 20 | |
Item 4. Controls and Procedures | | | 20 | |
| | | | |
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION: | | | | |
| | | | |
Item 1. Legal Proceedings | | | 20 | |
Item 2. Changes in Securities, Use of Proceeds and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities | | | 21 | |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities | | | 21 | |
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders | | | 21 | |
Item 5. Other Information | | | 21 | |
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K | | | 21 | |
| | | | |
SIGNATURES | | | 22 | |
| | | | |
INDEX TO EXHIBITS | | | 23 | |
2
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Hechinger Liquidation Trust
Unaudited Statements of Net Assets in Liquidation
($ in thousands)
| | | | | | | | |
| | As of | | As of |
| | March 31, | | September 30, |
| | 2004
| | 2003
|
Assets | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | | | | | | |
Designated as available for distribution to holders of impaired claims | | $ | 3,505 | | | $ | 7,136 | |
Reserved | | | 23,155 | | | | 24,288 | |
Restricted | | | 9,559 | | | | 9,730 | |
Other | | | 9,198 | | | | 5,683 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total cash and cash equivalents | | | 45,417 | | | | 46,837 | |
Preference receivables (net of costs of recovery of $1,141 and $1,491, respectively) | | | 3,832 | | | | 5,955 | |
Other assets | | | 2,213 | | | | 1,503 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | | 51,462 | | | | 54,295 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Unimpaired claims payable | | | 10,777 | | | | 11,044 | |
Convenience claims payable | | | 19 | | | | 22 | |
Uncashed claims checks | | | 164 | | | | 377 | |
Distributions payable to holders of allowed impaired claims | | | 308 | | | | 665 | |
Estimated costs of liquidation | | | 6,925 | | | | 7,611 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 18,193 | | | | 19,719 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net Assets in Liquidation | | $ | 33,269 | | | $ | 34,576 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes to unaudited financial statements.
3
Hechinger Liquidation Trust
Unaudited Statements of Changes in Net Assets in Liquidation
($ in thousands)
| | | | | | | | |
| | For the three months ended
|
| | March 31, 2004
| | March 31, 2003
|
Increase/(decrease) in Net Assets in Liquidation | | | | | | | | |
Increase/(decrease) in estimated fair value of preference receivables, net | | $ | (660 | ) | | $ | 1,187 | |
(Increase) in estimated fair value of unimpaired claims payable | | | — | | | | (248 | ) |
Interest income | | | 62 | | | | 123 | |
Other increases | | | 732 | | | | 199 | |
(Increase) in estimated costs of liquidation | | | (3,540 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Increase/(decrease) in Net Assets in Liquidation before distributions authorized | | | (3,406 | ) | | | 1,261 | |
Distributions authorized | | | 329 | | | | 1,519 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net decrease in Net Assets in Liquidation after distributions authorized | | | (3,735 | ) | | | (258 | ) |
Net Assets in Liquidation at beginning of period | | | 37,004 | | | | 44,019 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net Assets in Liquidation at end of period | | $ | 33,269 | | | $ | 43,761 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
| | For the six months ended
|
| | March 31, 2004
| | March 31, 2003
|
Increase/(decrease) in Net Assets in Liquidation | | | | | | | | |
Increase in estimated fair value of preference receivables, net | | $ | 3,090 | | | $ | 1,187 | |
Decrease in estimated fair value of unimpaired claims payable | | | — | | | | 336 | |
Interest income | | | 126 | | | | 299 | |
Other increases | | | 772 | | | | 245 | |
(Increase) in estimated costs of liquidation | | | (3,540 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Increase in Net Assets in Liquidation before distributions authorized | | | 448 | | | | 2,067 | |
Distributions authorized | | | 1,755 | | | | 2,488 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net decrease in Net Assets in Liquidation after distributions authorized | | | (1,307 | ) | | | (421 | ) |
Net Assets in Liquidation at beginning of period | | | 34,576 | | | | 44,182 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net Assets in Liquidation at end of period | | $ | 33,269 | | | $ | 43,761 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes to unaudited financial statements.
4
Hechinger Liquidation Trust
Unaudited Statements of Cash Receipts and Disbursements
($ in thousands)
| | | | | | | | |
| | For the six months ended
|
| | March 31, 2004
| | March 31, 2003
|
Cash receipts | | | | | | | | |
Preference collections, before costs of recovery | | $ | 6,222 | | | $ | 8,112 | |
Interest income | | | 126 | | | | 299 | |
Other receipts | | | 62 | | | | 1,233 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total cash receipts | | | 6,410 | | | | 9,644 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash disbursements | | | | | | | | |
Costs of liquidation | | | | | | | | |
Legal and professional fees | | | | | | | | |
Litigation | | | 2,162 | | | | 2,194 | |
Liquidation Trust operations | | | 1,087 | | | | 785 | |
Preference recoveries | | | 1,010 | | | | 1,038 | |
Operating expenses | | | 977 | | | | 1,345 | |
Unimpaired and convenience claims | | | 270 | | | | 1,527 | |
Reissued/(voided) claims checks, net | | | 212 | | | | (160 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Total cash disbursements | | | 5,718 | | | | 6,729 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Increase in cash and cash equivalents before distributions paid | | | 692 | | | | 2,915 | |
Distributions paid | | | 2,112 | | | | 4,246 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents | | | (1,420 | ) | | | (1,331 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | | | 46,837 | | | | 62,641 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | | $ | 45,417 | | | $ | 61,310 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes to unaudited financial statements.
5
Hechinger Liquidation Trust
Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements
1. Background and Basis of Presentation
Background
Hechinger Liquidation Trust (the “Liquidation Trust”) was established effective October 26, 2001 (the “Effective Date”) in accordance with the Revised First Amended Consolidated Plan of Liquidation (the “Plan”) for Hechinger Investment Company of Delaware, Inc. and affiliates, (the “Debtors”) confirmed by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the “Bankruptcy Court”) by an order dated October 5, 2001.
The Liquidation Trust has no authority to engage in any trade or business. The purpose of the Liquidation Trust is to (i) liquidate any and all remaining assets of the Debtors; (ii) pursue causes of action assigned to the Liquidation Trust, including preference, fraudulent conveyance and other avoidance actions; (iii) resolve, either consensually or through litigation, all disputed claims asserted against the Debtors (“Disputed Claims”), pursuant to the Plan; and (iv) make all distributions required under the Plan (“Distributions”), and payments to holders of claims allowed pursuant to the Plan (“Allowed Claims” and, together with the Disputed Claims, the “Claims”). The Liquidation Trust will terminate upon the earlier of (a) the fulfillment of its purpose by the liquidation of all of its assets and the distribution of the proceeds of the liquidation thereof in accordance with the Plan, or (b) by October 26, 2005, unless the Bankruptcy Court approves an extension of the term.
Pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code, certain types of Allowed Claims will be paid in full under the Plan. Such Claims are therefore referred to as “Unimpaired Claims.” The Plan defines which types of Claims are paid in full.
The Liquidation Trust exists primarily for the benefit of the majority of claimants who will not be repaid in full for the amounts the Debtors owed them as of the bankruptcy filing. These Claims are referred to as “Impaired Claims” because the rights of the claimants have been impaired by the Debtors’ bankruptcy. Each holder of an Allowed Claim in the Plan’s Class 4A (Senior Unsecured Claims), Class 4B (General Unsecured Claims), and Class 5 (Subordinated Debentures Claims) is deemed to hold a pro rata beneficial interest (the “Beneficial Interests”) in the Liquidation Trust based upon the amount of their Allowed Impaired Claim as compared to the total amount of all Impaired Claims ultimately Allowed. When and to the extent Disputed Impaired Claims become Allowed Impaired Claims, holders of such Claims become holders of Beneficial Interests in accordance with the Plan.
The holders of Beneficial Interests receive all remaining net proceeds of the Liquidation Trust, if any, after the expenses and all creditors of the Liquidation Trust, including Allowed Unimpaired and Convenience Claims (certain small Claims to be paid at 7.5% of their Allowed amounts in accordance with the Plan) are paid, and all contingencies are resolved. Holders of each Class of Beneficial Interests (i.e., each Class of Impaired Claims) have the same rights, except with respect to payment of Distributions.
During August 2002, the Bankruptcy Court authorized the Liquidation Trust to make an initial Distribution to holders of Beneficial Interests (i.e., to holders of Allowed Impaired Claims), at the rate of 4.515% of the Allowed amount of the Impaired Claims. The Liquidation Trust also established a reserve of 4.515% of the estimated amount of Disputed Impaired Claims, using the estimated value of such Claims approved by the Bankruptcy Court for reserve purposes. During June 2003, the Liquidation Trust made a second interim Distribution at the rate of 2.058%, and increased the reserve for each remaining Disputed Impaired Claim based on the cumulative 6.573% Distribution rate.
6
Basis of Presentation
The Liquidation Trust’s financial statements have been prepared using the liquidation basis of accounting. Under this method of accounting, the Statements of Net Assets in Liquidation reflect all assets and liabilities, including the projected total cost of liquidating the assets and winding down the affairs of the Liquidation Trust, at estimated fair value. Unimpaired Claims, to be paid in full, are reflected in the Statements of Net Assets in Liquidation as liabilities at estimated aggregate settlement amounts. Convenience Claims are also recorded as liabilities, at their estimated payment amount. The Statements of Changes in Net Assets in Liquidation primarily reflect any authorized Distributions to holders of Beneficial Interests and changes in the estimated fair value of the Liquidation Trust’s assets and liabilities. The Liquidation Trust’s fiscal year ends on September 30.
The accompanying unaudited financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments that are, in the opinion of the Liquidation Trustee, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. Such financial statements and these notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the audited Liquidation Trust financial statements as of September 30, 2003 and September 30, 2002, and for the periods from October 1, 2002 through September 30, 2003 and from October 26, 2001 (Effective Date) through September 30, 2002, and the notes thereto.
The amounts shown in this document are rounded and are therefore approximate.
Certain amounts in the unaudited financial statements for the six months ended March 31, 2003 have been reclassified to conform to the presentation for the current period.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires the Liquidation Trustee to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results are likely to differ from those estimates and those differences may be significant.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Liquidation Trust considers all highly liquid investments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Liquidation Trust holds substantially all cash balances in operating and investment accounts in excess of federally insured limits. Cash is classified as: Designated as Available for Distribution to Holders of Impaired Claims, Reserved, Restricted, and Other (see Note 3).
Taxes
The Liquidation Trust is intended to qualify as a liquidating trust for federal income tax purposes, and therefore should be taxable as a grantor trust. The holders of Beneficial Interests are treated as grantors; accordingly, their pro rata share of all items of income, gain, loss, deduction and credit are included in the income tax returns of the holders of Beneficial Interests.
The Liquidation Trust pays applicable taxes on the taxable income and gain allocable to holders of Disputed General Unsecured Claims on behalf of such holders and, when such Disputed Claims are ultimately resolved, holders whose Disputed Claims were determined to be Allowed Claims receive Distributions from the Liquidation Trust net of taxes, if any, which the Liquidation Trust previously paid on their behalf.
7
The Liquidation Trust incurs no taxable income or gain on its own behalf; therefore, no tax provision is recorded in the financial statements of the Liquidation Trust.
3. Cash
Cash is invested in highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less, and in accordance with Section 345 of the Bankruptcy Code or as otherwise permitted by order of the Bankruptcy Court. Under the terms of the Plan, the Liquidation Trust is not required to segregate funds for reserves.
Cash Designated as Available for Distribution to Holders of Impaired Claims (“Available Cash”) is designated to assure the availability of funds for payment to holders of Impaired Claims who have not received their Distributions. The amount pertaining to the reserve for Disputed Impaired Claims is based on the estimated amount of Disputed Impaired Claims approved by the Bankruptcy Court pursuant to the Reserve Order. Available Cash does not include Reserved Cash, Restricted Cash, or Other Cash, each further described below.
Available Cash consists of:
| | | | | | | | |
| | As of | | As of |
($ in thousands) | | March 31, 2004 | | September 30, 2003 |
| |
| |
|
Distributions payable | | $ | 308 | | | $ | 665 | |
Reserve for remaining Disputed Impaired Claims at 6.573% | | | 3,197 | | | | 6,471 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Available Cash | | $ | 3,505 | | | $ | 7,136 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Reserved Cash is held by the Liquidation Trust to assure payment of the Liquidation Trust’s obligations in accordance with the Plan. Under the terms of the Plan, Reserved Cash is intended to provide for (a) operating expenses of the Liquidation Trust, (b) estimated payments to holders of Allowed Unimpaired and Convenience Claims in accordance with the Plan, and (c) payments which may become necessary if and as Disputed Unimpaired Claims become Allowed, or if certain specific contingencies should occur. See Note 10 for details of specific reserves and their related amounts.
Restricted Cash consists of cash held as collateral for a letter of credit (see Note 6) and cash held in an escrow account.
Other Cash is cash and cash equivalents not designated to a specific reserve or fund.
4. Preference Receivables
The Liquidation Trust’s preference receivables are reflected in the accompanying Statements of Net Assets in Liquidation at their estimated fair value of $3.8 million, net of estimated costs of recovery of $1.1 million, for 56 preference cases being actively pursued and for settlement collections in progress at March 31, 2004; and $6.0 million, net of estimated costs of recovery of $1.5 million, for 90 preference cases being actively pursued and for settlement collections in progress at September 30, 2003.
The Liquidation Trust originally assigned no value to certain of the largest potential preference cases until fact-finding and initial negotiation indicated that some collection was likely. During the three months ended December 31, 2003, the last remaining such preference case was settled for $3.8 million, resulting in an increase in the estimated fair value of preference receivables of that amount. During the three months ended March 31, 2004, this settlement was collected in full.
The fair value of Liquidation Trust assets is reassessed at least quarterly and adjustments to estimated fair values are reflected in the period in which they become known. The eventual net realizable value of preference receivables is likely to differ from their estimated net fair value and these differences may be significant.
8
5. Other Assets
Other assets consists mainly of a receivable from Kemper Insurance Company (“Kemper”), the insurer for the Debtors’ workers’ compensation claims for a number of years, which is potentially subject to offset as collateral for the Kemper Claim (see Note 6). Additionally, the Liquidation Trust holds miscellaneous receivables from various former vendors, service providers, and others, including a settlement of $0.7 million, negotiated and recorded in the three months ended March 31, 2004, which was reached in litigation against a former insurance broker of the Debtors. Other assets is reported at estimated net fair value, based on either the amount paid (generally in the form of cash deposits) or the estimated recoverable amount, whichever is more determinable. The eventual net realizable value of these assets is likely to differ from their estimated net fair value and these differences may be significant.
6. Unimpaired Claims Payable
Unimpaired Claims payable represents the estimated aggregate settlement amount of Unimpaired Claims against the Debtors prior to the Effective Date of the Plan, which will be paid out at 100% of their Allowed amount. Such Claims are valued at the Liquidation Trust’s best estimate of the amount that will ultimately be allowed.
Unimpaired Claims payable consists of:
| | | | | | | | |
| | As of | | As of |
($ in thousands) | | March 31, 2004 | | September 30, 2003 |
| |
| |
|
Allowed Claims | | $ | 1,340 | | | $ | 1,392 | |
Estimated fair value of Disputed Claims | | | 9,437 | | | | 9,652 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Unimpaired Claims payable | | $ | 10,777 | | | $ | 11,044 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Asserted value of Disputed Claims | | $ | 9,553 | | | $ | 10,008 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Number of Disputed Claims | | | 12 | | | | 22 | |
| | | | | | | | |
The largest remaining Disputed Unimpaired Claim is a secured Claim asserted by Kemper (the “Kemper Claim”) for payment of certain liability claims against the Debtors (the “Insurance Claims”). In addition to certain amounts payable to the Liquidation Trust (see Note 5), Kemper holds an irrevocable cash-collateralized letter of credit with a balance of $8.8 million and $9.0 million as of March 31, 2004 and September 30, 2003, respectively. The Liquidation Trust believes that the value of these Insurance Claims is substantially lower than the collateral held by Kemper. Kemper and the Liquidation Trust have not established a mutually agreeable basis for determining the fair value of the Insurance Claims; as a result, the Liquidation Trust has continued to value the Kemper Claim in Unimpaired Claims payable at the full amount of the letter of credit held by Kemper. In December 2003, the Liquidation Trust filed a complaint in the Bankruptcy Court requesting, among other things, that the Bankruptcy Court fix the amount of the Kemper Claim and compel the return of excess collateral, deposits and other amounts held by Kemper to the Liquidation Trust (see Note 12). The ultimate fair value of this Claim is likely to differ from its estimated fair value and the difference may be significant.
Unimpaired Claims are valued by reviewing the facts available to the Liquidation Trust, including the Debtors’ records and information submitted by the claimants, and estimating the ultimate settlement value of the Claims. The fair value of Unimpaired Claims payable is reassessed at least quarterly and adjustments to estimated fair values are reflected in the period in which they become known. However, no assurance can be given as to the ultimate allowance, disallowance or settlement of the remaining Disputed Unimpaired Claims, individually or in the aggregate.
9
7. Uncashed Claims Checks
Pursuant to the Plan, any Claims payments and Distributions which remain uncashed for 90 days following their issuance date are forfeited to the Liquidation Trust for Distribution to other holders of Allowed Claims. Pending a final order from the Bankruptcy Court, the Liquidation Trust has treated such items as a liability. Such checks may be reissued upon request of the payee, subject to applicable fees.
8. Distributions Payable
Distributions payable primarily represents 6.573% of the Allowed amount of Impaired Claims for which the Liquidation Trust had not yet paid Distributions. A number of holders of such Allowed Claims, while otherwise eligible for Distributions, had either not yet provided all the information necessary for payment, or were subject to an offsetting claim by the Liquidation Trust which had not yet been resolved. Until all such issues are resolved, the holder of an Allowed Claim may not receive a Distribution.
9. Estimated Costs of Liquidation
The Wind-down Reserve and Litigation Reserve described below together constitute the estimated costs of liquidation in the accompanying Statements of Net Assets in Liquidation.
Under the Plan, the Liquidation Trust was required to establish and fund a reserve to pay administration costs and costs of holding and liquidating the Liquidation Trust’s assets (the “Wind-down Reserve”). Substantially all of the operations of the Liquidation Trust were previously expected to cease in early 2004; however, the resolution of preference receivables and other litigation, including the Kemper Complaint, and the related Claims, is now expected to extend into 2005, followed by certain necessary legal and accounting processes to be completed thereafter. Therefore, the Wind-down Reserve was increased by $1.5 million as of March 31, 2004. The Liquidation Trust believes the Wind-down Reserve of $4.6 million as of March 31, 2004 is sufficient to cover the projected total costs of operating the Liquidation Trust, consisting mainly of personnel, professional fees and related expenses, through its anticipated termination.
Pursuant to the Plan, the Liquidation Trust also established and funded a reserve to pay the costs of pursuing certain actions, primarily those referred to as the Bondholder Action and the Committee Action (the “Litigation Reserve”). The trial of the Committee Action, previously scheduled for January 2004, was adjourned in September 2003 without a new date, pending the outcome of the Bondholder Action trial held in October 2003. In March 2004, the court ruled in favor of the defendants and against the Liquidation Trust in the Bondholder Action (see Note 12). Subsequent to March 31, 2004, the Liquidation Trust filed an appeal from this ruling.
As of December 31, 2003, an assessment of future funding of the Litigation Reserve, if any, was deferred pending a decision in the Bondholder Action. Based on a review of the Bondholder Action ruling and any potential implications for the Committee Action, and of the Liquidation Trust’s alternatives in these matters, the Litigation Reserve was increased by $2.0 million during the three months ended March 31, 2004, in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Plan. The Liquidation Trust believes the Litigation Reserve balance of $2.3 million as of March 31, 2004 is sufficient to cover the estimated total costs of pursuing an appeal of the Bondholder Action and the trial in the Committee Action scheduled for August 2005.
The fair value of the estimated costs of liquidation is reassessed at least quarterly and adjustments to estimated fair values are reflected in the period in which they become known.
10
10. Bankruptcy Reserves Required
Reserves, other than those funded by Restricted Cash, or included in Available Cash, consist of:
| | | | | | | | |
| | As of | | As of |
($ in thousands) | | March 31, 2004
| | September 30, 2003
|
Liability Reserves | | | | | | | | |
Wind-down (net of related escrow of $278) | | $ | 4,348 | | | $ | 4,873 | |
Litigation | | | 2,298 | | | | 2,460 | |
Unimpaired Claims (net of collateralized letter of credit of $8,839 and $9,002, respectively) | | | 1,939 | | | | 2,042 | |
Uncashed Claims checks | | | 164 | | | | 377 | |
Convenience Claims | | | 19 | | | | 22 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Liability Reserves | | | 8,768 | | | | 9,774 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Contingency Reserves | | | | | | | | |
Fleet | | | 11,000 | | | | 11,000 | |
Excess Disputed Unimpaired Claims | | | 373 | | | | 425 | |
Preference settlement Claims | | | 14 | | | | 89 | |
Minimum reserve | | | 3,000 | | | | 3,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Contingency Reserves | | | 14,387 | | | | 14,514 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Reserves | | $ | 23,155 | | | $ | 24,288 | |
| | | | | | | | |
The Fleet reserve, established pursuant to a stipulated order between Fleet Retail Finance Inc. (“Fleet”) and the Liquidation Trust, is likely to be drawn upon if Fleet, as a defendant in the Committee Action and the Bondholder Action, should ultimately prevail in one or both of such actions. No liability has been accrued in connection with the Fleet reserve because the Liquidation Trust has appealed the adverse order and judgment in the Bondholder Action (see Note 12) and does not believe Fleet will ultimately prevail in either of these actions.
11. Impaired Claims
The Liquidation Trust’s estimate of Impaired Claims consists of:
| | | | | | | | |
| | As of | | As of |
($ in thousands) | | March 31, 2004
| | September 30, 2003
|
Allowed Claims | | $ | 700,527 | | | $ | 674,508 | |
Estimated fair value of Disputed Claims | | | 49,452 | | | | 84,219 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total estimated Impaired Claims | | $ | 749,979 | | | $ | 758,727 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Asserted value of Disputed Claims | | $ | 76,687 | | | $ | 128,213 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Number of Disputed Claims | | | 112 | | | | 172 | |
| | | | | | | | |
No assurance can be given as to the ultimate allowance, disallowance or settlement of the remaining Disputed Impaired Claims, individually or in the aggregate. The decrease in estimated fair value from September 30, 2003 to March 31, 2004 resulted primarily from (i) the settlement of a number of lease rejection Claims at less than the previously estimated amounts and (ii) vendor waivers of Claims, which had previously been included in the fair value estimate, as a result of preference settlement negotiations.
11
12. Contingencies
The Kemper Complaint
On December 3, 2003, the Liquidation Trust filed a complaint against Kemper and various related entities (the “Kemper Complaint”). In the Kemper Complaint, arising under various insurance policies that the Debtors purchased from Kemper, the Liquidation Trust seeks, among other things, an estimate under Section 502(c) of the Bankruptcy Code of the aggregate loss amounts owed by the Liquidation Trust for the Insurance Claims, a reduction in the letter of credit securing the amount owed by the Liquidation Trust with respect to such Insurance Claims, and the return of excess collateral, deposits and other amounts held by Kemper to the Liquidation Trust. Kemper holds an irrevocable cash-collateralized letter of credit with a balance of $8.8 million and $9.0 million as of March 31, 2004 and September 30, 2003, respectively, to secure payment of the Insurance Claims. In addition, Kemper holds certain other collateral, deposits, and amounts due to the Liquidation Trust.
In the Kemper Complaint, the Liquidation Trust alleges that its estimated liability for the Insurance Claims is less than $1.0 million, substantially lower than the letter of credit balance and other amounts held by Kemper. Kemper’s response to the Complaint disputes the Liquidation Trust’s estimates. Discovery in the proceeding commenced during the three months ended March 31, 2004, and is expected to continue through the balance of the year. The trial is scheduled for March 2005. The Liquidation Trust cannot predict with any certainty the outcome of the litigation or the amount or range of potential recoveries.
The Bondholder Action
On March 28, 2004, following a non-jury trial held in October 2003, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware issued an opinion and order (collectively, the “Decision”) in the Bondholder Action, which the Liquidation Trust is pursuing against Fleet and General Electric Credit Corp. (“GECC”), directing the entry of judgment in favor of Fleet and GECC. In April 2004, the Liquidation Trust filed an appeal from the Decision and related judgment. There can be no assurance of the outcome of the appeal. Also see the discussion of the Fleet reserve in Note 10.
The Committee Action
Subsequent to March 31, 2004, the Committee Action was assigned to the judge who presided in the Bondholder Action, who has set a briefing schedule for summary judgment and other motions and has scheduled the Committee Action for trial in August 2005.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Reference is made to the unaudited financial statements of the Liquidation Trust as of March 31, 2004 and September 30, 2003 and for the three months and six months ended March 31, 2004 and March 31, 2003, and the notes thereto (the “Unaudited Liquidation Trust Financial Statements”), included in Part I of this Form 10-Q. The following information concerning the Liquidation Trust’s financial performance and condition should be read in conjunction with the audited Liquidation Trust financial statements as of September 30, 2003 and September 30, 2002 and for the periods from October 1, 2002 through September 30, 2003 and from October 26, 2001 (Effective Date) through September 30, 2002, and the notes thereto.
The Unaudited Liquidation Trust Financial Statements have been prepared on the same basis as the audited Liquidation Trust financial statements, using the liquidation basis of accounting, and, in the opinion of the Liquidation Trustee, contain all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the Liquidation Trust’s results for such periods. The Liquidation Trust’s results for the three months ended March 31, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any other interim period or any future fiscal year. All amounts are rounded and are therefore approximate.
12
I. Accounting Policies and Estimates
The following discussion and analysis of the Liquidation Trust’s changes in net assets in liquidation, cash receipts and disbursements, and net assets in liquidation is based on the Unaudited Liquidation Trust Financial Statements which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and in accordance with the liquidation basis of accounting. During preparation of these financial statements, the Liquidation Trustee is required to make certain estimates and assumptions which affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities in liquidation at estimated fair value, resolution of disputed claims, resolution of current and potential litigation and the fair value, and related disclosure, of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, the Liquidation Trustee evaluates and updates these estimates and assumptions based on historical experience and on various other assumptions the Liquidation Trustee believes are reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates and different assumptions would lead to different estimates.
The Liquidation Trust’s critical accounting policies are described in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the Liquidation Trust’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2003.
II. Changes in Net Assets in Liquidation
Significant financial activities of the Liquidation Trust during the periods reflected below include Distributions authorized and payments to claimants of various Classes, settlement of Claims asserted, pursuit of preference receivables and other litigation, and carrying out the liquidation activities of the Liquidation Trust.
Net assets in liquidation are subject to material change when either (a) Distributions to holders of Allowed Impaired Claims are authorized, or (b) estimates of the fair value of the Liquidation Trust’s assets and/or liabilities change. Both the authorization of Distributions and changes in estimates are non-cash changes. These changes are shown in the Liquidation Trust’s Statements of Changes in Net Assets in Liquidation and are discussed below.
Most cash transactions, on the other hand, such as collection of receivables and payments of liabilities and Distributions, cause offsetting changes in the associated components of assets and liabilities, but do not change net assets in liquidation. The Liquidation Trust’s Statements of Cash Receipts and Disbursements show the results of these transactions, which are also discussed later under the heading “Cash Receipts and Disbursements.”
The following table summarizes the significant changes in net assets in liquidation for the periods as indicated:
| | | | | | | | |
| | For the three months ended
|
($ in thousands) | | March 31, 2004
| | March 31, 2003
|
Distributions authorized | | $ | (329 | ) | | $ | (1,519 | ) |
Changes in estimates – increase/(decrease) in net assets in liquidation: | | | | | | | | |
Costs of liquidation | | | (3,540 | ) | | | — | |
Preference receivables | | | (660 | ) | | | 1,187 | |
Unimpaired claims payable | | | — | | | | (248 | ) |
Net other increases | | | 794 | | | | 322 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net decrease in net assets in liquidation | | $ | (3,735 | ) | | $ | (258 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
13
| | | | | | | | |
| | For the six months ended
|
($ in thousands) | | March 31, 2004
| | March 31, 2003
|
Distributions authorized | | $ | (1,755 | ) | | $ | (2,488 | ) |
Changes in estimates – increase/(decrease) in net assets in liquidation: | | | | | | | | |
Costs of liquidation | | | (3,540 | ) | | | — | |
Preference receivables | | | 3,090 | | | | 1,187 | |
Unimpaired claims payable | | | — | | | | 336 | |
Net other increases | | | 898 | | | | 544 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net decrease in net assets in liquidation | | $ | (1,307 | ) | | $ | (421 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
A. Distributions authorized
Distributions at the rate of 6.573% were authorized to holders of $4.3 million and $26.0 million of Impaired Claims newly allowed during the three months and the six months ended March 31, 2004, respectively. In addition, included in Distributions authorized during such periods, the Liquidation Trust paid applicable taxes on certain taxable income and gain allocable to holders of Disputed General Unsecured Claims on behalf of such holders. Distributions at the rate of 4.515% were authorized to holders of $33.6 million and $55.1 million of Impaired Claims newly allowed during the three months and the six months ended March 31, 2003, respectively.
B. Changes in estimates
1. Costs of liquidation
Several events during the three months ended March 31, 2004 caused the Liquidation Trust to revise its estimates of the costs of winding down its operations and prosecuting the actions provided for in the Litigation Reserve:
• | | The filing of the Kemper Complaint has not resulted in a negotiated settlement; therefore estimated costs for counsel and experts have been planned through the scheduled March 2005 trial. |
|
• | | A number of the trials in preference actions scheduled during the current period were postponed indefinitely in the Bankruptcy Court. Scheduled preference action trials currently extend through the end of 2004, and not all cases have been scheduled. |
|
• | | As a result, the resolution of the remaining Claims, final Distributions and other wind-down matters are now expected to extend well into 2005. Certain limited operations of the Liquidation Trust must continue until these matters have been addressed. |
Therefore, the Wind-down Reserve was increased by $1.5 million during the three months ended March 31, 2004.
The Litigation Reserve was established to cover the costs of the Bondholder Action and of the Committee Action, for which a trial is now scheduled in August 2005. In March 2004, the court ruled in favor of the defendants and against the Liquidation Trust in the Bondholder Action. Subsequent to March 31, 2004, the Liquidation Trust filed an appeal from this ruling.
As of December 31, 2003, an assessment of future funding of the Litigation Reserve, if any, was deferred pending a decision in the Bondholder Action. Based on a review of the Bondholder Action ruling and any potential implications for the Committee Action, and of the Liquidation Trust’s alternatives in these matters, the Litigation Reserve was increased by $2.0 million during the three months ended March 31, 2004, in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Plan.
14
No such increases were made during the three months ended December 31, 2003, nor during the three months and the six months ended March 31, 2003, based on the Liquidation Trust’s evaluation, as of those dates, of the sufficiency of its reserves.
2. Estimated fair value of preference receivables
The estimated fair value of preference receivables decreased by $0.7 million during the three months ended March 31, 2004 and increased by a net amount of $3.1 million during the six months then ended. The decrease during the three months ended March 31, 2004 resulted from an increase in the estimated costs of prosecuting the remaining preference actions, which are the most difficult and contentious cases, including the engagement of a consulting firm. The increase during the six months ended March 31, 2004 was due to the $3.8 million settlement reached in the last remaining large preference case to which the Liquidation Trust had not previously assigned a value, as the case was not previously sufficiently developed to value. This settlement was recorded as an increase in the estimated fair value of preference receivables in the three months ended December 31, 2003 and collected in the three months ended March 31, 2004.
The increase in the estimated fair value of preference receivables of $1.2 million for the three months and the six months ended March 31, 2003 resulted from costs of collections which were lower than previously estimated, as well as from favorable settlements in several preference actions.
3. Estimated fair value of unimpaired claims payable
The fair value of Unimpaired Claims payable is reassessed at least quarterly and adjustments to estimated fair values are reflected in the period in which they become known. As a result of the ongoing Claims resolution process, fewer Disputed Unimpaired Claims remain as of each successive valuation date, and the Liquidation Trust becomes more familiar with the validity of each remaining Disputed Unimpaired Claim.
Based on its quarterly assessments, the estimated fair value of the remaining Disputed Unimpaired Claims as of March 31, 2004 remained unchanged from September 30, 2003, while minor adjustments in the estimated fair value of Unimpaired Claims payable for the three months and the six months ended March 31, 2003 resulted from the Liquidation Trust’s evaluation of various claims.
C. Other Increases
During the three months ended March 31, 2004, the Trust reached and recorded a $0.7 million settlement in litigation against a former insurance broker of the Debtors. No such item occurred during the three months ended December 31, 2003 or during the comparable periods of the prior year. The remainder of other increases related to interest income and miscellaneous receipts.
15
III. Cash Receipts and Disbursements
The following table summarizes the cash receipts and disbursements for the periods as indicated:
| | | | | | | | |
| | For the six months ended
|
($ in thousands) | | March 31, 2004
| | March 31, 2003
|
Cash receipts | | $ | 6,410 | | | $ | 9,644 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash disbursements: | | | | | | | | |
Legal and professional fees: | | | | | | | | |
Litigation | | | 2,162 | | | | 2,194 | |
Liquidation Trust operations | | | 1,087 | | | | 785 | |
Preference recoveries | | | 1,010 | | | | 1,038 | |
Operating expenses | | | 977 | | | | 1,345 | |
Claims paid | | | 482 | | | | 1,367 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total cash disbursements | | | 5,718 | | | | 6,729 | |
Distributions paid | | | 2,112 | | | | 4,246 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash outflow | | $ | (1,420 | ) | | $ | (1,331 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
A. Cash receipts
Most of the cash receipts are from collections of preference receivables, which have been ongoing since the preference actions were filed in mid-2001. Cash receipts during the six months ended March 31, 2004 were significantly lower than during the six months ended March 31, 2003, both because the remaining preference cases are the most difficult and contentious cases, and because the number of remaining preference cases available to settle has decreased significantly as a result of ongoing preference settlement efforts.
B. Legal and professional fees
Legal and professional fees reflect the activity level in various areas of the Liquidation Trust’s responsibilities.
The litigation fees, for the Bondholder Action and the Committee Action, during the six months ended March 31, 2004 were comparable to the six months ended March 31, 2003. There was a decrease in fees related to the Committee Action trial, which was adjourned during September 2003 without a new date, pending the outcome of the Bondholder Action trial. This decrease was offset by an increase in fees related to the Bondholder Action trial held in October 2003 and largely paid during the current period. The Committee Action case was in the discovery phase, incurring significant fees, during the six months ended March 31, 2003.
Legal and professional fees for Liquidation Trust operations include all legal, accounting, and other support services except for the services of counsel prosecuting the Bondholder Action and the Committee Action, and the firm pursuing preference collections on a contingency-fee basis. Certain of the largest preference claims suits are handled by Liquidation Trust counsel on an hourly basis and the related fees are included in Legal and professional fees — Liquidation Trust operations. The increase in fees for Liquidation Trust operations during the six months ended March 31, 2004 as compared to the six months ended March 31, 2003 results primarily from legal fees associated with a preference case settled for $3.8 million during the period (see II., B. “Changes in estimates,” above), and fees associated with the Kemper Complaint.
16
Preference recovery fees during the six months ended March 31, 2004 were comparable to those during the six months ended March 31, 2003, although preference receipts decreased significantly during the current period when compared to the prior period, primarily because preference recovery fees were unusually low, relative to collections, for the six months ended March 31, 2003. The fees for most preference settlements are contingent, and are set at a declining rate (generally ranging from 35% to 7% of collections) for larger cases, a number of which were settled during the prior period. Additionally, during the six months ended March 31, 2004, the Liquidation Trust incurred fees and expenses for an expert report in the $3.8 million case mentioned above. Finally, cases resulting in the $3.8 million collection during the six months ended March 31, 2004 and a $1.7 million collection during the six months ended March 31, 2003 were handled by counsel for Liquidation Trust operations, and the related expenses were included in the Statements of Cash Receipts and Disbursements under “Legal and professional fees – Liquidation Trust operations” as incurred.
C. Operating expenses
Operating expenses during the six months ended March 31, 2004 were substantially lower than those during the six months ended March 31, 2003, primarily because the number of Liquidation Trust employees decreased significantly between the two periods, resulting in lower payroll.
D. Claims payments
Payments of Unimpaired Claims were significantly lower during the six months ended March 31, 2004 than during the six months ended March 31, 2003 because, as a result of the ongoing Claims resolution process, fewer Unimpaired Claims remain to be resolved and paid as of each successive period.
E. Distributions paid
Distributions paid depend primarily on the amount of Allowed Impaired Claims, including Claims newly allowed, and on the Distributions authorized from time to time. An initial Distribution was authorized during August 2002 at a rate of 4.515%, and a second interim Distribution during June 2003 at the rate of 2.058%. As a result, during the six months ended March 31, 2004, the holders of Allowed Impaired Claims received the cumulative Distribution rate of 6.573% compared to the initial Distribution rate of 4.515% during the six months ended March 31, 2003. Offsetting the Distribution rate increase, however, as a result of the ongoing Claims resolution process, fewer Impaired Claims remain to be resolved and paid as of each successive period.
IV. Net Assets in Liquidation
A. Cash and cash equivalents and preference receivables
The Liquidation Trust’s cash and cash equivalents balance of $45.4 million and $46.8 million as of March 31, 2004 and September 30, 2003, respectively, is classified as either (a) Available Cash, (b) Reserved, (c) Restricted or (d) Other.
Available Cash is designated to assure the availability of funds for payment to holders of Impaired Claims who have not received authorized Distributions. The required amount of Available Cash of $3.5 million as of March 31, 2004 was based primarily on the cumulative Distribution rate of 6.573%, for $4.3 million of Allowed but unpaid Impaired Claims plus $49.3 million of Disputed Impaired Claims (at their estimated value for reserve purposes). The required amount of Available Cash of $7.1 million as of September 30, 2003 was also based primarily on the cumulative Distribution rate of 6.573%, for $9.3 million of Allowed but unpaid Impaired Claims plus $98.4 million of Disputed Impaired Claims (at their estimated value for reserve purposes). The value of Disputed Impaired Claims, for the purpose of establishing adequate reserves, was estimated by the Liquidation Trust and approved by the Bankruptcy Court in an order establishing the amounts of Disputed Claims Reserves (the “Reserve Order”).
17
Reserved Cash is held by the Liquidation Trust to assure payment of the Liquidation Trust’s obligations. Under the terms of the Plan, Reserved Cash is intended to provide for (a) operating expenses of the Liquidation Trust, (b) estimated payments to holders of Allowed Unimpaired and Convenience Claims in accordance with the Plan, and (c) payments which may become necessary if and as Disputed Unimpaired Claims become allowed, or if certain specific contingencies should occur. Reserved Cash decreased by $1.1 million from September 30, 2003 to March 31, 2004, to a balance of $23.2 million, as a result of decreases in various liability and contingency reserves, as discussed below and itemized in Note 10 to the Unaudited Liquidation Trust Financial Statements filed herein.
As of March 31, 2004, Restricted Cash of $9.6 million related primarily to the Kemper Claim discussed in “Liabilities,” below.
Preference receivables, net of costs of recovery, decreased by $2.1 million from September 30, 2003 to March 31, 2004, to a balance of $3.8 million primarily due to ongoing preference collections. Collections of preference receivables accrued as of September 30, 2003 totaled $2.5 million, and the related costs to collect totaled $1.0 million. The balance of the decrease was caused by an increase in estimated costs to collect of $0.7 million. Collections during the period also included the $3.8 million settlement agreed to and recorded as of December 31, 2003, and collected during the most recent quarter, as discussed in “Changes in estimates”, above, which therefore had no net effect on the balance of preference receivables as of September 30, 2003 and as of March 31, 2004.
B. Liabilities
Unimpaired Claims payable as of March 31, 2004 consisted of Disputed Unimpaired Claims with an estimated fair value of $9.4 million and Allowed but unpaid Unimpaired Claims totaling $1.3 million. The remaining Disputed Unimpaired Claims consists of 12 Claims asserted (or estimated for reserve purposes if no Claim amount was specified) at $9.8 million. Most of this amount consists of a Claim filed by Kemper relating to certain insurance claims. The Kemper Claim is secured by a letter of credit, and its fair value is estimated at the outstanding letter of credit balance of $8.8 million as of March 31, 2004 (see “Contingencies”, below). If all remaining Disputed Unimpaired Claims were to be allowed at their asserted or reserved amounts, net assets in liquidation would not be materially reduced.
Estimated costs of liquidation decreased by $0.7 million from September 30, 2003 to March 31, 2004, to a balance of $6.9 million. The decrease is due to disbursements totaling $2.1 million from the Wind-down Reserve and $2.2 million from the Litigation Reserve, partially offset by increases of $1.5 million to the Wind-down Reserve and $2.0 million to the Litigation Reserve, as discussed in “Changes in estimates”, above.
C. Contingency reserves
The most significant component in contingency reserves is the Fleet reserve, established at a total of $11.0 million pursuant to a stipulated order between Fleet Retail Finance Inc. (“Fleet”) and the Liquidation Trust. The Fleet reserve is likely to be drawn upon if Fleet, as a defendant in the Committee Action and the Bondholder Action, should ultimately prevail in one or both actions. No liability has been accrued in connection with the Fleet reserve because the Liquidation Trust has appealed the adverse order and judgment in the Bondholder Action and does not believe Fleet will ultimately prevail in either of the Actions.
18
V. Contingencies
Cases before the United States District Court
The Bondholder Action
The Bondholder Action trial was held in October 2003. On March 28, 2004 Court issued an opinion and order (collectively, the “Decision”) in the Bondholder Action, directing the entry of judgment in favor of Fleet and GECC. In April 2004, the Liquidation Trust filed an appeal from the Decision and related judgment. There can be no assurance of the outcome of the appeal. Also see IV.C., “Contingency reserves”, above.
The Committee Action
The trial of the Committee Action, previously scheduled for January 2004, was adjourned in September 2003 without a new date, pending the outcome of the Bondholder Action trial. Subsequent to the end of the quarter, the Committee Action was assigned to the judge who presided in the Bondholder Action, who has set a briefing schedule for summary judgment and other motions and has scheduled the Committee Action for trial in August 2005.
The various defendants are vigorously opposing these actions. There is no assurance that the Liquidation Trust will prevail on the claims asserted in the Committee Action and the Bondholder Action. The Liquidation Trust cannot predict with any certainty the outcome of the litigation or the amount or range of potential recoveries.
Cases before the Bankruptcy Court
In December 2003, the Liquidation Trust filed a complaint against Kemper and various related entities (the “Kemper Complaint”). In the Kemper Complaint, arising under various insurance policies that the Debtors purchased from Kemper, the Liquidation Trust seeks, among other things, an estimate under Section 502(c) of the Bankruptcy Code of the aggregate loss amounts owed by the Liquidation Trust for unliquidated workers’ compensation claims against the Debtors (the “Insurance Claims”), a reduction in the letter of credit securing the amount owed by the Liquidation Trust with respect to such Insurance Claims, and the return of excess collateral, deposits and other amounts held by Kemper to the Liquidation Trust. Kemper holds an irrevocable cash-collateralized letter of credit with a balance of $8.8 million as of March 31, 2004 to secure payment of the Insurance Claims. In addition, Kemper holds certain other collateral, deposits, and amounts due to the Liquidation Trust.
In the Kemper Complaint, the Liquidation Trust alleges that its estimated liability for the Insurance Claims is less than $1.0 million, substantially lower than the letter of credit balance and other amounts held by Kemper. Kemper’s response to the Complaint disputes the Liquidation Trust’s estimates. Discovery in the proceeding commenced during the three months ended March 31, 2004, and is expected to continue through the balance of the year. (See also Item 2. - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, specifically II.B.1, “Costs of liquidation” and III.B., “Legal and professional fees”, above.) The trial is scheduled for March 2005. The Liquidation Trust cannot predict with any certainty the outcome of the litigation or the amount or range of potential recoveries.
VI. Forward-Looking Statements
This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements about the business, financial condition and prospects of the Liquidation Trust. The actual results of the Liquidation Trust could differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements because of various risks and uncertainties, including, without limitation, the Liquidation Trust’s success in securing claims settlements on the terms currently contemplated in ongoing negotiations and in other estimates of settlement value, the
19
effect of substantial delays in settling contingent assets and liabilities, resulting in a prolonged period of liquidation, economic conditions, changes in tax and other government rules and regulations applicable to the Liquidation Trust and other risks. These risks are beyond the ability of the Liquidation Trust to control, and in many cases, the Liquidation Trust cannot predict the risks and uncertainties that could cause its actual results to differ materially from those indicated by any forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-Q. When used in this quarterly report, the words “believes,” “estimates,” “plans,” “expects,” “anticipates” and other similar expressions as they relate to the Liquidation Trust or the Liquidation Trustee are intended to identify forward-looking statements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The Liquidation Trust does not hold any market risk sensitive instruments.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
The Liquidation Trust has designed and maintains disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that information required to be disclosed in its reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and regulations. These controls and procedures are also designed to ensure that such information is communicated to the Liquidation Trustee, to allow him to make timely decisions about required disclosures.
The Liquidation Trust, including the Liquidation Trustee, has conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based on that evaluation, the Liquidation Trustee concluded that the Liquidation Trust’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of March 31, 2004.
There has been no change in the Liquidation Trust’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Liquidation Trust’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Liquidation Trust’s internal control over financial reporting.
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Further background information about the following cases is disclosed in Part I, Item 3 – Legal Proceedings, of the Liquidation Trust’s Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2003, and in Part II, Item 1 – Legal Proceedings, of the Liquidation Trust’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2003.
Cases before the United States District Court
The Bondholder Action
The Bondholder Action trial was held in October 2003. On March 28, 2004 Court issued an opinion and order (collectively, the “Decision”) in the Bondholder Action, directing the entry of judgment in favor of Fleet and GECC. In April 2004, the Liquidation Trust filed an appeal to the Decision and related judgment. There can be no assurance of the outcome of the appeal.
The Committee Action
The trial of the Committee Action, previously scheduled for January 2004, was adjourned in September 2003 without a new date, pending the outcome of the Bondholder Action trial. Subsequent to March 31, 2004, the Committee Action was assigned to the judge who presided in the Bondholder Action, who has set a briefing schedule for summary judgment and other motions and has scheduled the Committee Action for trial in August 2005.
20
The various defendants are vigorously opposing these actions. There is no assurance that the Liquidation Trust will prevail on the claims asserted in the Committee Action and the Bondholder Action. The Liquidation Trust cannot predict with any certainty the outcome of the litigation or the amount or range of potential recoveries.
Cases before the Bankruptcy Court
In December 2003, the Liquidation Trust filed a complaint against Kemper and various related entities (the “Kemper Complaint”). In the Kemper Complaint, arising under various insurance policies that the Debtors purchased from Kemper, the Liquidation Trust seeks, among other things, an estimate under Section 502(c) of the Bankruptcy Code of the aggregate loss amounts owed by the Liquidation Trust for unliquidated workers’ compensation claims against the Debtors (the “Insurance Claims”), a reduction in the letter of credit securing the amount owed by the Liquidation Trust with respect to such Insurance Claims, and the return of excess collateral, deposits and other amounts held by Kemper to the Liquidation Trust. Kemper holds an irrevocable cash-collateralized letter of credit with a balance of $8.8 million as of March 31, 2004 to secure payment of the Insurance Claims. In addition, Kemper holds certain other collateral, deposits, and amounts due to the Liquidation Trust.
In the Kemper Complaint, the Liquidation Trust alleges that its estimated liability for the Insurance Claims is less than $1.0 million, substantially lower than the letter of credit balance and other amounts held by Kemper. Kemper’s response to the Complaint disputes the Liquidation Trust’s estimates. Discovery in the proceeding commenced during the three months ended March 31, 2004, and is expected to continue through the balance of the year. The trial is scheduled for March 2005. The Liquidation Trust cannot predict with any certainty the outcome of the litigation or the amount or range of potential recoveries.
Item 2. Changes in Securities, Use of Proceeds and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits
| | |
Exhibit Number | | Document |
| | |
31.1 | | Certification by Trustee pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) Under the Exchange Act |
| | |
32.1 | | Liquidation Trustee’s Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
A Current Report on Form 8-K under Item 5 – Other Events and Regulation FD Disclosures, dated March 28, 2004, was filed to disclose that the United States District Court for the District of Delaware issued an opinion and order in the adversary proceeding known as the Bondholder Action, which the Liquidation Trust is pursuing against Fleet Retail Finance Inc. and General Electric Credit Corp., directing the entry of judgment in favor of Fleet and GECC.
21
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| | | | |
| | HECHINGER LIQUIDATION TRUST |
| | | | |
Date: May 14, 2004 | | By: | | /s/ Conrad F. Hocking |
| | | |
|
| | Name: | | Conrad F. Hocking |
| | Title: | | Liquidation Trustee |
22
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
FORM 10-Q
Exhibit No.
31.1 | | Certification by Trustee pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Exchange Act |
|
32.1 | | Liquidation Trustee’s Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
23