The historical earnings per share, dividends and book values of PartnerRe and AXIS shown in the table below are derived from their respective audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014. The unaudited pro forma comparative basic and diluted earnings per share data give effect to the acquisition method of accounting as if the amalgamation had been completed on January 1, 2014. The unaudited pro forma book value per share information was computed as if the amalgamation had been completed on December 31, 2014.
You should read this information in conjunction with the historical financial information of PartnerRe and AXIS included or incorporated elsewhere into this joint proxy statement/prospectus, including PartnerRe’s and AXIS’ respective financial statements and related notes thereto. The unaudited pro forma per share data is not necessarily indicative of either actual results had the amalgamation occurred as of the dates or during the periods indicated or of the future operations of PartnerRe or AXIS.
This unaudited pro forma per share financial data does not give consideration to the impact of possible revenue enhancements, potential loss of business, expense efficiencies, synergies, strategy modifications, asset dispositions or other actions. This pro forma per share data is subject to risks and uncertainties, including those discussed in the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus titled “Risk Factors.”
Per share data as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014:
| | | | | | | | | |
Book value per common share | | $ | 129.51 | | | $ | 52.23 | | | $ | 53.77 | |
Diluted book value per common share | | $ | 126.21 | | | $ | 50.63 | | | $ | 52.12 | |
Diluted tangible book value per common share(1) | | $ | 114.76 | | | $ | 49.76 | | | $ | 50.79 | |
Dividends declared per common share | | $ | 2.68 | | | $ | 1.10 | | | $ | 1.16 | |
Net income available to common shareholders per common share—basic | | $ | 19.96 | | | $ | 7.38 | | | $ | 7.83 | |
Net income available to common shareholders per common share—diluted | | $ | 19.51 | | | $ | 7.29 | | | $ | 7.79 | |
Operating income available to common shareholders per common share—diluted(1) | | $ | 14.76 | | | $ | 5.32 | | | $ | 5.91 | |
(1) Diluted tangible book value per common share and operating income are "non-GAAP financial measures" as defined by Regulation G.
Diluted tangible book value per common share is calculated using common shareholders’ equity attributable to controlling interests (total shareholders’ equity less noncontrolling interests and aggregate liquidation value of preferred shares) less goodwill and intangible assets, net of tax, divided by the diluted common shares outstanding (assuming exercise of all share-based awards and other dilutive securities). We believe that this measure, in combination with diluted book value per common share, is useful in assessing value generated for our common shareholders. A reconciliation of diluted tangible book value per common share to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure is provided below:
| | As of December 31, 2014 |
| | Partner Re Historical | | AXIS Historical | | Unaudited Pro Forma |
Total shareholders' equity | | $ | 7,104,411 | | | $ | 5,879,940 | | | $ | 12,549,714 | |
Less: | | | | | | | | | |
Preferred shares, aggregate liquidation value | | 853,750 | | | 627,843 | | | 1,481,593 | |
Noncontrolling interests | | 55,501 | | | 58,819 | | | 114,320 | |
Common shareholders' equity attributable to controlling interests | | 6,195,160 | | | 5,193,278 | | | 10,953,801 | |
Less: | | | | | | | | | |
Goodwill | | 456,380 | | | 47,148 | | | 47,148 | |
Intangible assets, net of tax | | 105,652 | | | 41,812 | | | 232,655 | |
Tangible book value attributable to common shareholders | | $ | 5,633,128 | | | $ | 5,104,318 | | | $ | 10,673,998 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Diluted common shares outstanding | | 49,087 | | | 102,577 | | | 210,173 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Diluted tangible book value per common share | | $ | 114.76 | | | $ | 49.76 | | | $ | 50.79 | |
Operating income represents after-tax operational results without consideration of after-tax net realized investment gains, foreign exchange gains, interest in earnings of equity method investments and withholding tax on inter-company dividends. Diluted operating earnings per common share is derived from this non-GAAP operating income measure. For a further explanation of this measure, see PartnerRe’s and AXIS’ Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014. A reconciliation of diluted operating earnings per common share to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure is provided below:
| | | Year Ended December 31, 2014 | |
| | | Partner Re Historical | | | | AXIS Historical | | | | Unaudited Pro Forma | |
Net income available to common shareholders | | $ | 998,239 | | | $ | 770,657 | | | $ | 1,698,731 | |
Less: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net realized investment gains, net of tax | | | 286,252 | | | | 106,196 | | | | 247,778 | |
Net foreign exchange gains (losses), net of tax | | | (45,883 | ) | | | 101,586 | | | | 158,174 | |
Interest in earnings of equity method investments, net of tax | | | 8,577 | | | | — | | | | 8,577 | |
Withholding tax on inter-company dividends, net of tax | | | (6,125 | ) | | | — | | | | (6,125 | ) |
Operating income available to common shareholders | | $ | 755,418 | | | $ | 562,875 | | | $ | 1,290,327 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - diluted | | | 51,174 | | | | 105,713 | | | | 218,167 | |
Operating income available to common shareholders per common share - diluted | | $ | 14.76 | | | $ | 5.32 | | | $ | 5.91 | |
PartnerRe common shares are quoted on the NYSE under the ticker symbol “PRE.” The following table shows the intraday high and low prices for the PartnerRe common shares and cash dividends per share, for the periods indicated as reported by the NYSE. These prices do not necessarily represent actual transactions.
| | | | | PartnerRe | | | | |
| | High | | | Low | | | Dividend | |
Year ending December 31, 2015 | | | | | | | | | |
First quarter (March 9, 2015) | | $ | 122.45 | | | $ | 110.39 | | | $ | 0.70 | (1) |
Year ended December 31, 2014 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fourth quarter | | $ | 118.47 | | | $ | 107.57 | | | $ | 0.67 | |
Third quarter | | $ | 113.35 | | | $ | 103.57 | | | $ | 0.67 | |
Second quarter | | $ | 109.73 | | | $ | 99.99 | | | $ | 0.67 | |
First quarter | | $ | 104.95 | | | $ | 94.50 | | | $ | 0.67 | |
Year ended December 31, 2013 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fourth quarter | | $ | 105.90 | | | $ | 90.48 | | | $ | 0.64 | |
Third quarter | | $ | 93.44 | | | $ | 85.98 | | | $ | 0.64 | |
Second quarter | | $ | 96.41 | | | $ | 86.13 | | | $ | 0.64 | |
First quarter | | $ | 94.26 | | | $ | 80.50 | | | $ | 0.64 | |
(1) | Dividend declared February 2, 2015 and paid February 27, 2015. |
On January 23, 2015, the last business day before the public announcement of the amalgamation agreement, and [·], 2015, the last reported sales price of PartnerRe common shares, as reported by the NYSE, was $114.14 and $[·], respectively. PartnerRe shareholders and AXIS shareholders are encouraged to obtain current market quotations for PartnerRe common shares before making any decision with respect to the amalgamation. No assurance can be given concerning the market price for PartnerRe common shares before or after the date on which the amalgamation will close. The market price for PartnerRe common shares will fluctuate between the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus and the date on which the amalgamation closes and thereafter.
As of February 13, 2015, there were approximately 92,967 holders of record of PartnerRe common shares. This does not represent the actual number of beneficial owners of PartnerRe common shares because shares are frequently held in “street names” by securities dealers and others for the benefit of beneficial owners who may vote shares.
AXIS common shares are quoted on the NYSE under the ticker symbol “AXS.” The following table shows the intraday high and low prices for the AXIS common shares and cash dividends per share, for the periods indicated as reported by NYSE. These prices do not necessarily represent actual transactions.
| | | | | AXIS | | | | |
| | High | | | Low | | | Dividend | |
Year ending December 31, 2015 | | | | | | | | | |
First quarter (March 9, 2015) | | $ | 53.02 | | | $ | 47.65 | | | $ | 0.29 | (1) |
Year ended December 31, 2014 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fourth quarter | | $ | 52.21 | | | $ | 44.94 | | | $ | 0.29 | |
Third quarter | | $ | 48.66 | | | $ | 43.00 | | | $ | 0.27 | |
Second quarter | | $ | 47.34 | | | $ | 43.91 | | | $ | 0.27 | |
First quarter | | $ | 47.41 | | | $ | 41.82 | | | $ | 0.27 | |
Year ended December 31, 2013 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fourth quarter | | $ | 49.75 | | | $ | 43.43 | | | $ | 0.27 | |
Third quarter | | $ | 48.39 | | | $ | 41.87 | | | $ | 0.25 | |
Second quarter | | $ | 46.88 | | | $ | 41.29 | | | $ | 0.25 | |
First quarter | | $ | 41.98 | | | $ | 34.95 | | | $ | 0.25 | |
(1) | Dividend declared February 20, 2015 and payable April 15, 2015. |
On January 23, 2015, the business day before the public announcement of the amalgamation agreement, and [·], 2015, the last reported sales price of AXIS common shares, as reported by the NYSE, was $49.33 and $[●], respectively. AXIS shareholders and PartnerRe shareholders are encouraged to obtain current market quotations for AXIS common shares before making any decision with respect to the amalgamation. No assurance can be given concerning the market price for AXIS common shares before or after the date on which the amalgamation will close. The market price for AXIS common shares will fluctuate between the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus and the date on which the amalgamation closes and thereafter.
As of March 3, 2015, there were 23 holders of record of AXIS common shares. This does not represent the actual number of beneficial owners of AXIS common shares because shares are frequently held in “street names” by securities dealers and others for the benefit of beneficial owners who may vote shares.
PartnerRe Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners, Management and Directors of PartnerRe
The following table sets forth information as of March 6, 2015 with respect to the beneficial ownership of issued and outstanding common shares by (i) PartnerRe’s Chief Executive Officer, PartnerRe’s Chief Financial Officer, and each of the three remaining most highly compensated executive officers during the 2014 fiscal year (collectively, Named Executive Officers or NEOs); (ii) each of PartnerRe’s directors; (iii) all of PartnerRe’s executive officers and directors as a group; and (iv) each person known by us to beneficially own 5% or more of the issued and outstanding PartnerRe common shares. As defined by the SEC, a person is deemed to “beneficially own” shares if such person directly or indirectly (i) has or shares the power to vote or dispose of such shares, regardless of whether such person has any pecuniary interest in the shares; or (ii) has the right to acquire the power to vote or dispose of such shares within 60 days, including through the exercise of any option, warrant, or right. Pursuant to Rule 13d-4 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the statements concerning voting and dispositive power concerning PartnerRe common shares included in the footnotes to this table shall not be construed as confirmation that such persons are the beneficial owners of such common shares.
As of March 6, 2015, the common shares owned by all directors and executive officers as a group (including Costas Miranthis, PartnerRe’s former President and Chief Executive Officer) constitute approximately 2.1% of the issued and outstanding common shares, net of treasury shares. The shares detailed in the table below are not necessarily owned by the entity named but may be owned by accounts over which it exercises discretionary investment authority.
| | | | | Exercisable Options/SSARs | | | Amount of Beneficial Ownership | | | Percentage of Issued and Outstanding Common Shares | |
David Zwiener | | | 5,587 | | | | 25,621 | | | | 31,208 | | | | * | |
William Babcock | | | 9,659 | | | | 100,317 | | | | 109,976 | | | | * | |
Emmanuel Clarke | | | 23,357 | | | | 106,329 | | | | 129,686 | | | | * | |
Laurie Desmet | | | 10,517 | | | | 65,987 | | | | 76,504 | | | | * | |
Theodore C. Walker | | | 8,809 | | | | 209,460 | | | | 218,269 | | | | * | |
Costas Miranthis | | | 126,821 | | | | 65,874 | | | | 192,695 | | | | * | |
Jean-Paul L. Montupet | | | 10,166 | | | | 38,627 | | | | 48,793 | | | | * | |
Judith Hanratty | | | 1,039 | | | | 6,683 | | | | 7,722 | | | | * | |
Jan H. Holsboer | | | 20,086 | | | | 66,062 | | | | 86,148 | | | | * | |
Roberto Mendoza | | | 2,194 | | | | 23,170 | | | | 25,364 | | | | * | |
Debra J. Perry | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | * | |
Rémy Sautter | | | 11,149 | | | | 17,451 | | | | 28,600 | | | | * | |
Greg F. H. Seow | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | * | |
Kevin M. Twomey | | | 2,674 | | | | 34,765 | | | | 37,439 | | | | * | |
Egbert Willam | | | - | | | | 3,899 | | | | 3,899 | | | | * | |
All directors and executive officers (15 total) | | | | | | | | | | | 996,303 | | | | 2.1 | % |
Other Beneficial Owners(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Vanguard Group, Inc. (2) 100 Vanguard Blvd. Malvern, PA 19355 | | | 3,803,996 | | | | — | | | | 3,803,996 | | | | 7.8 | % |
AllianceBernstein L.P. (3) 1345 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10105 | | | 3,769,797 | | | | — | | | | 3,769,797 | | | | 7.7 | % |
* Denotes beneficial ownership of less than 1%
(1) | The information contained in Other Beneficial Owners is based solely on reports on Schedules 13G/A filed with the SEC; PartnerRe has not independently verified the data. |
(2) | As of December 31, 2014, based on a report on Schedule 13G filed on February 11, 2015, The Vanguard Group, Inc. beneficially owns and has sole voting power over 45,694 common shares, sole dispositive power over 3,762,002 common shares and shared dispositive power over 41,994 common shares. Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Vanguard Group, Inc is the beneficially owner of 28,894 common shares. Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the beneficial owner of 29,900 common shares. The ownership percentage is based on the assumption that The Vanguard Group, Inc. continues to own the number of common shares reflected in the table above as of February 17, 2015. |
(3) | As of December 31, 2014, based on a report on Schedule 13G filed on February 10, 2015, AllianceBernstein L.P. beneficially owns and has sole voting power over 3,374,724 common shares, sole dispositive power over 3,768,647 common shares and shared dispositive power over 1,150 common shares. The ownership percentage is based on the assumption that AllianceBernstein L.P. continues to own the number of common shares reflected in the table above as of February 17, 2015. |
There are no arrangements, known to PartnerRe, including any pledge by any person of securities of PartnerRe, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of PartnerRe, other than the amalgamation agreement between PartnerRe and AXIS (see Business—General in Item 1 of Part I of this report).
AXIS Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners, Management and Directors of AXIS
The following table sets forth information as of March 6, 2015 with respect to the beneficial ownership of issued and outstanding common shares by (i) AXIS’ Chief Executive Officer, AXIS’ Chief Financial Officer, and each of the three remaining most highly compensated executive officers during the 2014 fiscal year (collectively, Named Executive Officers or NEOs); (ii) each of AXIS’ directors; (iii) all of AXIS’ executive officers and directors as a group; and (iv) each person known by us to beneficially own 5% or more of the issued and outstanding AXIS common shares. As defined by the SEC, a person is deemed to “beneficially own” shares if such person directly or indirectly (i) has or shares the power to vote or dispose of such shares, regardless of whether such person has any pecuniary interest in the shares; or (ii) has the right to acquire the power to vote or dispose of such shares within 60 days, including through the exercise of any option, warrant, or right. Pursuant to Rule 13d-4 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the statements concerning voting and dispositive power concerning AXIS common shares included in the footnotes to this table shall not be construed as confirmation that such persons are the beneficial owners of such common shares.
Directors and Executive Officers | | Number of Common Shares (1) | | | Percent of Outstanding Common Shares (1) | |
Executive Officers | | | | | | |
Albert A. Benchimol | | | 508,237 | | | | * | |
Christopher N. DiSipio | | | 56,913 | | | | * | |
Joseph C. Henry | | | 23,759 | | | | * | |
John D. Nichols | | | 84,325 | | | | * | |
Peter W. Wilson | | | 2,869 | | | | * | |
Non-Employee Directors | | | | | | | | |
Geoffrey Bell | | | 13,454 | | | | * | |
Jane Boisseau | | | 6,971 | | | | * | |
Michael A. Butt | | | 1,215,956 | | | | 1.2% | |
Charles A. Davis | | | — | | | | * | |
Robert L. Friedman | | | 47,183 | | | | * | |
Christopher V. Greetham | | | 24,949 | | | | * | |
Maurice A. Keane | | | 95,880 | | | | * | |
Sir Andrew Large | | | 9,711 | | | | * | |
Cheryl-Ann Lister | | | 23,716 | | | | * | |
Thomas C. Ramey | | | 12,276 | | | | * | |
Henry B. Smith | | | 38,309 | | | | * | |
Alice Young | | | 2,177 | | | | * | |
Wilhelm Zeller | | | 12,527 | | | | * | |
All directors and executive officers as a group (18 persons) | | | 2,179,212 | | | | 2.2% | |
Other Shareholders | | | | | | | | |
FMR LLC and related entities (2) | | | 9,777,217 | | | | 9.56% | |
Pzena Investment Management, LLC (3) | | | 7,078,975 | | | | 6.93% | |
The Vanguard Group (4) | | | 7,742,888 | | | | 7.57% | |
BlackRock, Inc. (5) | | | 5,205,588 | | | | 5.1% | |
(1) | Unless otherwise indicated, the number of common shares beneficially owned and percentage ownership are based on 100,936,535 common shares issued and outstanding as of March 6, 2015 adjusted as required by rules promulgated by the SEC. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and includes sole or shared voting or investment power with respect to such shares. Except as indicated in the footnotes to the table, based on information provided by the persons named in the table, such persons have sole voting and investment power with respect to all common shares shown as beneficially owned by them. Our bye-laws reduce the total voting power of any shareholder owning 9.5% or more of our common shares to less than 9.5% of the voting power of our issued share capital, but only in the event that a U.S. Shareholder, as defined in our bye-laws, owning 9.5% or more of our common shares is first determined to exist. |
(2) | The number of common shares beneficially owned and the information set forth below is based solely on information contained in Amendment No. 11 to the Schedule 13G/A filed on February 13, 2015 by FMR LLC, 245 Summer Street, Boston Massachusetts, 02210, and includes common shares beneficially owned as of December 31, 2014. FMR LLC has sole voting power over 528,665 common shares and sole dispositive power over 9,777,217 common shares; Edward C. Johnson 3d is a Director and the Chairman of FMR LLC and has sole dispositive power over 9,777,217 common shares; Abigail P. Johnson is a Director, the Vice Chairman, the Chief Executive Officer and the President of FMR LLC and has sole dispositive power over 9,777,217 common shares; Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund has sole voting power over 7,484,300 common shares. Neither FMR LLC nor Edward C. Johnson 3d nor Abigail P. Johnson has the sole power to vote or direct the voting of the shares owned directly by the various investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act (“Fidelity Funds”) advised by Fidelity Management & Research Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of FMR LLC, which power resides with the Fidelity Funds’ Boards of Trustees. Fidelity Management & Research Company carries out the voting of the shares under written guidelines established by the Fidelity Funds’ Boards of Trustees. |
(3) | The number of common shares beneficially owned and the information set forth below is based solely on information contained in Schedule 13G filed on January 29, 2015 by Pzena Investment Management, LLC (“Pzena”), 120 West 45th Street, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10036, and includes common shares beneficially owned as of December 31, 2014. Pzena has sole voting power over 3,862,876 common shares and sole dispositive power over 7,078,975 common shares. |
(4) | The number of common shares beneficially owned and the information set forth below is based solely on information contained in Schedule 13G filed on February 10, 2015 by The Vanguard Group (“Vanguard”), 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355, and includes common shares beneficially owned as of December 31, 2014. Vanguard has sole voting power over 100,257 common shares and sole dispositive power over 7,658,702 common shares. |
(5) | The number of common shares beneficially owned and the information set forth below is based solely on information contained in Schedule 13G filed on February 3, 2015 by BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”), 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10022, and includes common shares beneficially owned as of December 31, 2014. BlackRock has sole voting power over 4,429,021 common shares and sole dispositive power over 5,205,588 common shares. |
As of the effective time, subject to the terms and conditions of the amalgamation agreement and the statutory amalgamation agreement, AXIS and PartnerRe will be amalgamated and the amalgamated company will continue after the amalgamation. The parties have acknowledged and agreed that for the purposes of Bermuda law; (i) the amalgamation will be effected so as to constitute an “amalgamation” in accordance with section 104 of the Companies Act; and (ii) Newco will be deemed to be an “amalgamated company” as such term is understood under the Companies Act. Under the Companies Act, from and after the effective time: (i) the amalgamation of AXIS and PartnerRe and their continuance as one company will become effective; (ii) the property of each of AXIS and PartnerRe will become the property of the amalgamated company; (iii) the amalgamated company will continue to be liable for the obligations and liabilities of each of AXIS and PartnerRe; (iv) any existing cause of action, claim or liability to prosecution will be unaffected; (v) any civil, criminal or administrative action or proceeding pending by or against AXIS or PartnerRe may continue to be prosecuted by or against the amalgamated company; and (vi) a conviction against, or ruling, order or judgment in favor of or against AXIS or PartnerRe may be enforced by or against the amalgamated company.
At the effective time; (i) each PartnerRe common share issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time will be converted into the right to receive 2.18 Newco common shares, together with any cash payable in lieu of any fractional Newco common share; and (ii) each AXIS common share issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time will be converted into the right to receive one Newco common share.
At the effective time, each PartnerRe preferred share and each AXIS preferred share issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time will continue as a preferred share of Newco and will be entitled to the same dividend and other relative rights, preferences, limitations and restrictions as are now provided by the respective certificate of designation, preferences and rights of such PartnerRe preferred shares or AXIS preferred shares, respectively.
The PartnerRe board of directors and senior management periodically review the company’s operations, financial condition and performance, and long-term strategic plan and objectives, as well as industry conditions, regulatory developments and their respective impact on PartnerRe’s long-term strategic plan and objectives. Over the past two years, the PartnerRe board of directors has reviewed and considered the current and future industry trends and risks to PartnerRe’s ability to execute its strategic plan as a stand-alone entity, including the impact of continuing consolidation in the reinsurance industry, and increasing competitive pricing from, among other things, consolidation of brokers and increasing participation in catastrophe markets by alternative sources of capital. The PartnerRe board of directors also reviewed the full range of strategic alternatives to continuing to execute its business plan as a stand-alone entity and concluded that continuing as a stand-alone entity and seeking to reposition the company in response to changing market conditions would be the most actionable alternative, and the most attractive alternative, for the shareholders of PartnerRe.
The PartnerRe board of directors identified four key factors that it believed would drive PartnerRe’s operational, financial and business growth as a stand-alone entity in the face of changing industry and market conditions. These factors were: (i) size and scale in both insurance and reinsurance markets; (ii) capabilities in the primary insurance market and the ability to dynamically deploy capital; (iii) ability to leverage third party capital in catastrophe and non-catastrophe markets; and (iv) pursuit of opportunistic acquisitions that would be accretive.
In September 2013, the senior management of PartnerRe presented a possible strategic acquisition candidate to the PartnerRe board of directors. The PartnerRe board of directors reviewed the merits and challenges of completing the possible acquisition proposed by the senior management, and after preliminary analysis and discussions with the senior management, the PartnerRe board of directors determined that it would be worthwhile exploring that acquisition further. In this regard, the PartnerRe board of directors established a transaction committee of the PartnerRe board of directors (the “PartnerRe Transaction Committee”) to further evaluate the possibility of proceeding with the transaction. The PartnerRe Transaction Committee was composed of Mr. Jean-Paul Montupet, Chairman of the PartnerRe board of directors, Mr. Costas Miranthis, the then-Chief Executive Officer of PartnerRe and a member of the PartnerRe board of directors, and Messrs. Roberto Mendoza and David Zwiener, each a member of the PartnerRe board of directors. After preliminary discussions, the PartnerRe Transaction Committee, while working with the senior management of PartnerRe, determined that the transaction with the counterparty was not actionable.
In early 2014, Mr. Miranthis had preliminary discussions with another counterparty in connection with a potential strategic transaction. Mr. Miranthis further discussed this matter with the members of the senior management of PartnerRe and representatives from Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP (“Davis Polk”), PartnerRe’s regular U.S. outside counsel, and Credit Suisse, with whom PartnerRe had a preexisting retainer agreement, which was later modified to cover the amalgamation with AXIS. In February 2014, Mr. Miranthis reported to the PartnerRe board of directors on the preliminary discussions he had had with the counterparty in connection with the potential strategic transaction. In his report, Mr. Miranthis identified potential synergies and strategic benefits of the possible transaction to the PartnerRe board of directors. After discussions with the senior management, the PartnerRe board of directors unanimously supported further dialogue with the counterparty. The PartnerRe board of directors authorized the PartnerRe Transaction Committee to evaluate the possible transaction and oversee discussions with the counterparty and directed the PartnerRe Transaction Committee to report back to the PartnerRe board of directors with respect to its findings.
After the February 2014 meeting of the PartnerRe board of directors, the PartnerRe Transaction Committee, with the assistance of senior management and advisors, explored and evaluated the terms of the potential transaction that it would be willing to pursue. The PartnerRe board of directors was subsequently briefed by the PartnerRe Transaction Committee and members of the senior management on the further preliminary discussions with such counterparty and unanimously authorized the PartnerRe Transaction Committee to explore, evaluate and negotiate the terms of a possible transaction with the identified counterparty, and any other strategic transaction that it would deem to be in the best interests of PartnerRe and its shareholders, and to recommend such transaction to the PartnerRe board of directors. In June 2014, after further discussions with the counterparty, the PartnerRe Transaction Committee concluded that no actionable transaction would be possible on such terms, and the PartnerRe Transaction Committee terminated discussions with such counterparty.
Following the termination of discussions, the PartnerRe board of directors directed senior management to consider other possible responses to the trends in the industry, including potential acquisitions and strategic options and to report their findings to the PartnerRe board of directors.
During the September and November 2014 meetings of the PartnerRe board of directors, the PartnerRe board of directors considered various strategic options to respond to changing industry trends presented by senior management, including potential transactions with a variety of primary insurance companies or participating in the consolidation of the reinsurance sector. At these meetings, members of the senior management gave an overview of certain challenges faced by the reinsurance industry and the strategic landscape, including a review of several potential candidates, which included AXIS. The PartnerRe board of directors then generally concluded that a transaction involving a company in the primary insurance market would be the logical next strategic step for PartnerRe because such a transaction, in comparison to a transaction with a pure-play reinsurance company, likely would lead to higher levels of value creation for PartnerRe’s shareholders by allowing PartnerRe to expand its business platforms and enter the primary insurance market. However, the PartnerRe board of directors discussed the fact that the primary insurance targets that PartnerRe believed it could viably acquire did not have sufficient market presence to enable PartnerRe to enter the primary insurance market in a meaningful manner. Furthermore, since primary insurance companies historically traded at higher multiples than reinsurance companies, the premium required for the acquisition of a primary insurance target likely would be dilutive to PartnerRe’s earnings per share. The PartnerRe board of directors considered that AXIS, with its roughly even split of reinsurance and insurance business, could be a merger partner that offered PartnerRe’s shareholders the opportunity to be invested in an entity with a primary insurance business and with an ability to consolidate in the reinsurance market while achieving significant financial and operational synergies, creating a combined company that would be well-positioned as a leader in the broker-based reinsurance distribution channel. The PartnerRe board of directors also considered that a strategic transaction between PartnerRe and AXIS would result in a combined company that would be in a significantly stronger financial and operational position. In light of these considerations, the PartnerRe board of directors thought that AXIS was an attractive strategic candidate that could accomplish all of PartnerRe’s strategic goals, provided a transaction could be negotiated on the terms and conditions acceptable to PartnerRe and its shareholders.
Following the November 2014 meeting of the PartnerRe board of directors, the non-executive members of the PartnerRe Transaction Committee further discussed the strategic alternatives potentially available to PartnerRe at that time. The non-executive members of the PartnerRe Transaction Committee discussed their belief that a combination with AXIS represented the most likely opportunity for PartnerRe to accomplish all of PartnerRe’s strategic goals, but they would need to explore whether such a transaction was actionable in the form of a merger of equals. Given the rapidly growing trend of consolidation in the reinsurance market and in light of discussions at the November 2014 PartnerRe board of directors meeting, the non-executive members of the PartnerRe Transaction Committee determined that it was necessary to quickly understand whether AXIS would be receptive to a strategic transaction with PartnerRe. The non-executive members of the PartnerRe Transaction Committee also determined that, since any merger of equals transaction with AXIS would raise questions about the leadership of the combined company, initial discussions regarding a proposed transaction with AXIS should be at the Chairman to Chairman level.
The AXIS board of directors and AXIS’ senior management regularly review and evaluate their strategic plan and competitive positioning in the global insurance and reinsurance markets and regulatory developments with the goal of maximizing shareholder value. As part of their review process, the AXIS board of directors routinely analyzes the competitive landscape, including the trading price of its common shares, and the current environment in the industries in which AXIS operates. As part of this ongoing process the AXIS board of directors and senior management of AXIS from time to time consider a variety of potential alternatives including possible acquisitions and business combinations.
In June 2014, AXIS received an informal oral communication regarding a potential transaction. After consideration of all relevant factors by the AXIS board of directors and the senior management, the AXIS board of directors determined that it would be preferable for AXIS to continue to pursue its strategy as an independent company.
As part of its annual strategy session during its September 2014 meetings, the AXIS board of directors and senior management evaluated industry trends, AXIS’ position in the insurance and reinsurance markets and various strategic options that may be available to AXIS. The evaluation included discussions of certain potential transactions in the insurance and reinsurance sectors. At these meetings, members of the senior management of AXIS also gave an overview of the strengths and challenges faced by the industry and the strategic landscape for AXIS’ businesses. These topics were discussed in detail by the AXIS board of directors at the September 2014 board meetings and again at a meeting on December 5, 2014 in connection with the board of directors’ annual review of the AXIS’ business plans for the upcoming year.
In the first week of December, 2014, Mr. Mendoza contacted Mr. Michael Butt, the Chairman of AXIS, whom Mr. Mendoza had known professionally for several years, and invited Mr. Butt to have an introductory meeting with Mr. Montupet regarding a business proposal. As a result of years of business interactions, PartnerRe and AXIS were familiar with each other’s respective reinsurance businesses. Mr. Butt reported his conversation with Mr. Mendoza to Mr. Albert Benchimol, the Chief Executive Officer of AXIS, and to some other members of the AXIS board of directors at a board dinner that evening.
On December 10, 2014, Mr. Montupet had an introductory telephone conversation with Mr. Butt. Messrs. Montupet and Butt discussed, among other things, the challenges facing the reinsurance industry and the high level of M&A activity and consolidation in the industry. In this context, Mr. Montupet suggested that it could be in the best interests of the two companies and their respective shareholders to explore a potential merger of equals between PartnerRe and AXIS. Mr. Butt advised Mr. Montupet that the AXIS board of directors had approved AXIS’ strategic plan at its September board meeting and its 2015 business plan at its December board meeting and was confident in AXIS’ ability to move forward as an independent company. However, Mr. Butt indicated that the possibility of a merger of equals transaction with PartnerRe could be of interest and that he would review the matter with the Executive Committee of the AXIS board of directors (the “Executive Committee”) and get back to him. After the call, Mr. Butt called Mr. Benchimol and advised him of his call with Mr. Montupet.
On December 11, 2014, Messrs. Butt and Benchimol had a lengthy meeting to discuss the potential transaction with PartnerRe. They also met with the AXIS Lead Independent Director, Mr. Henry Smith. The members of the Executive Committee, Messrs. Butt, Benchimol, Smith and Charles A. Davis, then met by phone and discussed the inquiry Mr. Butt had received from Mr. Montupet. The Executive Committee discussed the advantages and disadvantages associated with the PartnerRe proposal as compared to the standalone prospects of AXIS as well as the potential for alternative transactions that might offer greater value to AXIS’ shareholders. The consensus of the Executive Committee was that while AXIS was comfortable with its current strategy as an independent company, given the parties’ respective reinsurance businesses and the environment for transactions in the reinsurance market, they may be interested in further exploring a merger of equals with PartnerRe. The directors also discussed in detail the potential composition of the board of directors and management of a combined entity and Messers. Butt, Smith and Davis expressed the desire that Mr. Benchimol assume the role of Chief Executive Officer of the combined company because, among other reasons, of his familiarity with both companies. The directors also noted that Mr. Benchimol’s future role was a necessary condition to be resolved before AXIS would agree to a meeting with the representatives of PartnerRe. Mr. Butt also discussed with two other directors whether they would support exploratory talks with PartnerRe on the basis outlined by the Executive Committee. Both of the other directors supported such talks. They, along with the Executive Committee, recommended that this matter should be discussed with the full AXIS board of directors at an early opportunity.
On December 12, 2014, Mr. Butt called Mr. Montupet and indicated that AXIS was interested in exploring a potential merger of equals with PartnerRe, but noted that its willingness to do so was conditioned on Mr. Benchimol being appointed as the Chief Executive Officer of the combined company. Mr. Butt indicated that, consistent with a merger of equals structure, PartnerRe could appoint Mr. Montupet as the Chairman of the board of the combined company, with the key members of the management of the combined company coming from both parties. Mr. Montupet told Mr. Butt that PartnerRe would consider this proposal and revert to Mr. Butt in a few days.
Thereafter, the non-executive members of the PartnerRe Transaction Committee further discussed the response from AXIS, including discussions with a representative from Davis Polk. The non-executive members of the PartnerRe Transaction Committee concluded that it would be in the best interests of PartnerRe and its shareholders to continue exploratory discussions with AXIS. The non-executive members of the PartnerRe Transaction Committee also discussed AXIS’ requirement that Mr. Benchimol be appointed the Chief Executive Officer of the combined company in the event of a transaction. The PartnerRe Transaction Committee concluded that Mr. Benchimol would be the more suitable candidate to lead the combined company and would be well-placed to position the combined company for success and achieve the potential synergies afforded by the proposed transaction because he had extensive experience in managing primary insurance business due to his employment at AXIS and was already familiar with the PartnerRe business and to the senior management of PartnerRe and the PartnerRe board of directors given his past employment with PartnerRe, including 10 years as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (including his position as the Chief Executive Officer of the Capital Markets Group during his last three years at PartnerRe), during which time he had earned the confidence of and developed strong working relationships with the members of the PartnerRe board of directors.
On December 15, 2014, Mr. Montupet informed Mr. Butt that, subject to final approval by the PartnerRe board of directors, the non-executive members of the PartnerRe Transaction Committee were amenable to AXIS’ proposal that Mr. Benchimol be appointed the Chief Executive Officer of the combined business if the other key terms of a proposed transaction could be agreed. Mr. Butt reaffirmed that Mr. Montupet could be appointed as the Chairman of the board of the combined company and proposed that the board of the combined company have equal representation from both companies. On the same call, Messrs. Montupet and Butt agreed to an in-person meeting between the non-executive members of the PartnerRe Transaction Committee and representatives of AXIS, which meeting was subsequently scheduled for January 6, 2015, and agreed that it would be determined at a later date which PartnerRe and AXIS senior officers would be senior officers of the combined company. Later that day, representatives of AXIS began due diligence of publicly available information regarding PartnerRe.
The AXIS board of directors had a telephonic meeting on December 16, 2014 in which management described the PartnerRe business, discussed the benefits and challenges of a potential strategic transaction with PartnerRe and considered the various financial, structural, process related, legal, timing and other relevant aspects of such a transaction. The AXIS board of directors also evaluated the value to AXIS’ shareholders of the consolidated companies versus the current business plan. It also considered the industry market conditions and challenges and the potential impact of future industry consolidation. A further discussion ensued regarding Mr. Benchimol’s appointment as Chief Executive Officer of the amalgamated company and the next steps associated with a response to PartnerRe regarding their proposal. Following these discussions, the AXIS board of directors authorized Messrs. Butt and Benchimol to have more detailed discussions with the representatives of PartnerRe.
Between December 19 and 22, 2014, Mr. Montupet individually called each of the non-executive members of the PartnerRe board of directors and informed them of the recent developments with AXIS regarding a potential no-premium merger of equals. All non-executive PartnerRe board of directors members were supportive of continuing discussions with AXIS, including proceeding on the basis that Mr. Benchimol be appointed the Chief Executive Officer of the combined company.
On January 6, 2015, the planned meeting between the non-executive members of the PartnerRe Transaction Committee and Messrs. Butt and Benchimol took place. At the meeting, Mr. Benchimol presented an analysis that he and AXIS senior management had prepared utilizing publicly available information of both companies that summarize his vision for the combined business, including how to achieve the benefits of increased size and scale, as well as estimates for potential synergies that could be achieved by a strategic transaction. The participants discussed the potential business and strategic benefits that could result from a strategic transaction. AXIS proposed that the respective ownership percentages of the combined company of each party be set at 50/50 and that the initial board of the combined company comprise 13 members, six to be designated by PartnerRe and AXIS each with the last member being the Chief Executive Officer of the combined company. PartnerRe made a counter-proposal that the respective ownership percentages of the combined company of the shareholders of each party should reflect each party’s respective current market capitalizations and relative tangible book value and that, consistent with the past discussions between Messrs. Butt and Montupet, the initial board of the combined company should have equal representation from both parties, further proposing that the initial board should comprise 12 members, with six to be designated by PartnerRe and AXIS each. The parties also started discussions on potential senior officers of the combined company. The parties did not reach agreement on the respective ownership percentages of the combined company of each party or the board composition of the combined company. Later that day, Messrs. Montupet and Butt further discussed the issue of the basis on which the respective board representation and ownership percentage of the combined company of each party should be determined in the context of the proposed transaction.
Following the meeting, the non-executive members of the PartnerRe Transaction Committee discussed Mr. Benchimol’s vision for the combined company, including the strategic benefits of a merger of equals with AXIS and determined that it was in the best interests of PartnerRe and its shareholders to continue discussions with AXIS. The non-executive members of the PartnerRe Transaction Committee further discussed AXIS’ proposal on the respective ownership percentages of the combined company of each party, the board composition of the combined company and a counter-proposal on these issues that Mr. Montupet would deliver to AXIS.
On January 7, 2015, Mr. Montupet had a telephone conversation with Mr. Butt. On this call, Mr. Montupet stated that the non-executive members of the PartnerRe Transaction Committee would be willing to recommend to the PartnerRe board of directors an ownership split of the combined company taking into consideration each party’s current relative tangible book value and respective market capitalizations resulting in a proposed ownership split of the combined company of 51.6% and 48.4% for PartnerRe and AXIS, respectively. During the same call, Mr. Butt proposed that the combined company have an initial board of 14 directors, seven to be designated by PartnerRe (including Mr. Montupet, who would be appointed as the Chairman of the board of the combined company) and seven to be designated by AXIS (including Mr. Benchimol, who would be appointed as the Chief Executive Officer of the combined company). Mr. Montupet responded to the proposal by stating that the non-executive members of the PartnerRe Transaction Committee would be willing to recommend Mr. Butt’s proposal on the board composition if AXIS agreed to the PartnerRe proposal on ownership percentages. Mr. Butt agreed to discuss these positions regarding the respective ownership split of the combined company and board composition with the AXIS board of directors at a telephonic meeting of the AXIS board of directors scheduled for later the same day, and revert to Mr. Montupet with the decision of the AXIS board of directors.
Later that day the AXIS board of directors had a telephonic meeting to discuss the status of negotiations. The board of directors of AXIS discussed the proposed valuation and considered whether the potential transaction was in the best interests of its shareholders. Mr. Benchimol reviewed the potential senior management roster and discussed potential financial advisors should the transaction move forward. The AXIS board of directors continued to express interest in a potential strategic transaction with PartnerRe and authorized Mr. Butt to proceed on the basis of the proposed ownership split of the combined company of 51.6%/48.4%, the proposal that AXIS and PartnerRe each designate seven members of the combined entity’s initial board of directors and that Mr. Benchimol be the Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Montupet the Chairman of the board of the combined company. Later the same day, following the AXIS board of directors meeting, Mr. Butt informed Mr. Montupet of the decisions made by the AXIS board of directors at its meeting earlier that day. They then discussed the next steps in pursuing the potential transaction, which included more detailed analysis of the transaction, mutual due diligence, refining the estimates of synergies and negotiation of definitive transaction documents.
Between January 7, 2015 and January 15, 2015, progress continued on several work streams. Mr. Montupet discussed with Mr. Miranthis the status of negotiations with AXIS and his role in the potential transaction, including whether it would be in PartnerRe’s and his mutual best interest for him to continue to serve as the Chief Executive Officer of PartnerRe until closing of the proposed transaction, or separate from PartnerRe at signing so he could explore other opportunities. Mr. Montupet discussed with Mr. Zwiener his willingness to serve as the interim Chief Executive Officer of PartnerRe between signing and closing given his extensive experience, including senior management experience, in the insurance and other financial industries that would make him a well-qualified candidate for the position. AXIS and PartnerRe also negotiated a mutual confidentiality agreement containing a customary, mutual one-year standstill provision. The parties also continued to explore and refine their understanding of key issues, including the structure of the proposed transaction, other terms that needed to be negotiated, and composition of the board committees, and made preparations for detailed due diligence.
On January 14, 2015, Mr. Montupet contacted Mr. Butt and proposed to have a meeting of the PartnerRe Transaction Committee and Messrs. Butt and Benchimol on January 21, 2015 to further discuss the potential strategic transaction. Mr. Butt agreed to have a meeting, subject to confirming the date with Mr. Benchimol.
On January 16, 2015, Messrs. Montupet and Benchimol discussed the proposed agenda for the scheduled January 21 meeting.
Also on January 16, 2015, the PartnerRe board of directors held a special meeting by telephone, during which the non-executive members of the PartnerRe Transaction Committee reported on the recent developments in connection with the proposed transaction between PartnerRe and AXIS. A representative of Davis Polk also joined the meeting. Among other things, the PartnerRe board of directors discussed the potential business and strategic benefits of such transaction, possible deal structures, due diligence matters and cultural issues. The PartnerRe board of directors supported the PartnerRe Transaction Committee’s recommendation to accept, subject to completion of due diligence and satisfactory negotiation of open items, a split of ownership of the combined company of 51.6% and 48.4%, the proposal that AXIS and PartnerRe each designate seven members of the combined entity’s initial board of directors and AXIS’ precondition that Mr. Benchimol be the Chief Executive Officer of the combined company.
At the same meeting, the PartnerRe board of directors also discussed the leadership of PartnerRe in the event of entering into definitive transaction documents with AXIS and discussed the possibility of a leadership change, including the possibility of Mr. Zwiener being appointed as the interim Chief Executive Officer.
On January 17, 2015, the non-executive members of the PartnerRe Transaction Committee met with the representatives of Davis Polk and Credit Suisse to plan the next steps in the proposed transaction with AXIS, including the expected signing timeline, structure of the transaction, minimizing the transaction execution risk, planning for the possibility of a leak, and due diligence approach. Given AXIS’ and PartnerRe’s significant, preexisting understanding of each other’s respective businesses and operations and the availability of substantially final financial information for the most recently completed fiscal year, representatives of AXIS and PartnerRe discussed with their advisors that there was an opportunity for an efficient due diligence process. In order to minimize the risks to the potential transaction posed by a possible leak, the non-executive members of the PartnerRe Transaction Committee determined to explore with AXIS the possibility of completing due diligence and negotiating definitive transaction documents expeditiously, tentatively targeting the announcement of the transaction prior to January 26, 2015. Later that day, Mr. Montupet and Mr. Benchimol met to discuss the timing of the potential transaction and agreed to proceed towards signing by January 26, 2015, provided that it was possible to complete satisfactory due diligence and finalize definitive transaction documents. Mr. Benchimol contacted Mr. Butt and discussed with him the outcome of his meeting with Mr. Montupet, and Mr. Butt concurred with the action plan that had been discussed during the meeting. Mr. Benchimol and Mr. Butt agreed that it would be appropriate to retain Goldman Sachs as the financial advisor to the AXIS board of directors, due to its extensive experience advising companies in the insurance and reinsurance industries in which AXIS and PartnerRe operate. Later the same day, Mr. Benchimol reached out to formally engage Goldman Sachs as AXIS’ financial advisor, having initially contacted Goldman Sachs earlier in the week.
On January 18, 2015, the PartnerRe Transaction Committee met with the senior management of PartnerRe to plan due diligence and the next phases of the proposed transaction with AXIS. Also on January 18 members of senior management of AXIS met with representatives of Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP (“Simpson Thacher”), regular outside legal counsel to AXIS, and Goldman Sachs to discuss the key financial elements of the proposed transaction with PartnerRe, significant details relating to the proposed transaction structure and the diligence procedure, timeline and milestones that would need to be met to ensure that the negotiation and execution of definitive transaction agreements proceeded as expeditiously as possible.
On January 19, 2015, a meeting of the board of directors of AXIS took place. Mr. Butt began with an update by noting that he and Mr. Montupet had agreed on several material matters, including that the respective ownership percentages of PartnerRe and AXIS shareholders in the amalgamated company would be 51.6% and 48.4%, respectively, that the initial board of directors of the amalgamated company would be comprised equally of PartnerRe and AXIS appointed directors and that Messrs. Benchimol and Montupet would be the Chief Executive Officer and the Chairman of the board of the amalgamated company, respectively. Mr. Butt also noted that a due diligence work plan was established after Mr. Butt, members of the AXIS management and AXIS’ legal and financial advisors met with the PartnerRe management and PartnerRe’s advisors on January 18, 2015. Mr. Benchimol then reported on the details of the due diligence work plan and the management’s preliminary due diligence findings in respect of PartnerRe. The AXIS board of directors discussed certain governance matters of the amalgamated company, including their support for Mr. Benchimol to assume the Chief Executive Officer position of the amalgamated company.
From January 19 to January 24, 2015, representatives from PartnerRe and AXIS, along with their financial and legal advisors, engaged in extensive confidential due diligence of each other’s financial, actuarial, accounting, operational, regulatory, legal, human resources, information technology and business profiles. Over the course of this time, representatives from PartnerRe and AXIS participated in various detailed in-person meetings and conference calls to discuss their areas of respective expertise and identify the potential risks and merits of the proposed strategic transaction. As needed, additional meetings and conference calls were scheduled to address follow-up diligence requests and questions. These meetings and calls were attended by a large number of representatives of both parties, including members of their senior management. Both parties provided each other access to electronic data rooms with substantial nonpublic information for due diligence purposes. In addition to the information gathered during in-person meetings, the senior management of both companies and their respective advisors continued to review both public and nonpublic information made available in the data rooms to supplement their in-person due diligence activities. The non-executive members of the PartnerRe Transaction Committee and representatives from AXIS, including Messrs. Butt and Benchimol and their respective advisors also further discussed issues related to due diligence, composition of the board committees and management of the combined company and requirements related to the appointment and removal of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chairman of the board of the directors of the combined company. In addition, representatives from Davis Polk and Simpson Thacher began discussing structuring alternatives for combining the companies and the terms of a transaction agreement. During this period, at the end of each day, each of AXIS and PartnerRe would also convene with their respective representatives to deliberate on the most significant findings that were emerging from their ongoing evaluation and analyses, the status of the due diligence process, and the next steps to be taken in the transaction process.
In the early hours of January 20, 2015, Simpson Thacher sent its initial draft of the Agreement and Plan of Amalgamation (as subsequently revised by the parties prior to execution of the definitive agreement, the “Draft Agreement”) to Davis Polk.
On January 20, 2015, the PartnerRe board of directors received an in-person detailed briefing (with one director participating by audio conference and another director participating by video conference) from the senior management, non-executive members of the PartnerRe Transaction Committee and representatives from Davis Polk and Credit Suisse on interim due diligence findings, the merits of, and risks associated with, the proposed transaction, the status of negotiations on the terms of the deal and proposed timeline to signing. Mr. Miranthis also expressed his support for the proposed transaction and explained its merits to the PartnerRe board of directors. The PartnerRe board of directors supported the senior management team and the non-executive members of the PartnerRe Transaction Committee continuing to pursue the proposed transaction with AXIS, complete due diligence and finalize the definitive transaction documents.
Between January 20 and January 25, 2015, the parties completed the due diligence and negotiated the definitive transaction documents. Representatives from Davis Polk, Credit Suisse, senior management of PartnerRe and the non-executive members of the PartnerRe Transaction Committee negotiated the terms of the Draft Agreement with the representatives from Simpson Thacher, AXIS and Goldman Sachs. Representatives from Simpson Thacher gave daily briefings regarding the status of legal due diligence to AXIS management during this period. The key issues negotiated among the parties included, among other things, termination rights, termination fees, other deal protection provisions, conditions to closing, transaction structure, retention arrangements for employees and treatment of options and awards in the proposed transaction.
The AXIS board of directors had a telephonic meeting on January 22, 2015 to discuss the status of due diligence and negotiations on the material terms of the transaction and certain open terms of the proposed transaction. Senior members of the AXIS management team briefed the AXIS board of directors on their preliminary business and operational due diligence findings. Representatives of Goldman Sachs reviewed its preliminary financial analysis of the proposed transaction, while representatives of Simpson Thacher briefed the AXIS board of directors on certain open points in the negotiation of the definitive transaction agreement. During their deliberations, members of the AXIS board of directors asked and received answers to a number of questions of senior management, Goldman Sachs and Simpson Thacher. In addition, the AXIS board of directors discussed strategic rationales for the transaction, the key financial assumptions of the proposed transaction as well as potential negative considerations. The AXIS board of directors also examined other potential acquisition or merger partners for each of AXIS and PartnerRe. The AXIS board of directors and the senior management team at AXIS also discussed the expectation as to which individuals would fill certain key management positions at the combined company.
On January 23, 2015 the parties agreed to an exchange ratio of 2.18 common shares of the combined company for each common share of PartnerRe and 1 common share for each common share of AXIS to achieve the previously agreed split of ownership of 51.6% and 48.4%.
On January 25, 2015, the PartnerRe board of directors held an in-person meeting (with two directors participating by audio conference), which was also attended by the senior management of PartnerRe and representatives from Credit Suisse, Davis Polk and Appleby (Bermuda) Limited (“Appleby”). Prior to the meeting, the members of the PartnerRe board of directors had been provided with a set of meeting materials, including a summary of the fiduciary duties of the PartnerRe board of directors under applicable law and other Bermuda law aspects of the proposed transaction prepared by Appleby, a summary of the key terms and conditions of the Draft Agreement prepared by Davis Polk, certain financial analyses prepared by Credit Suisse, as further described below under “The Amalgamation─Opinion of PartnerRe’s Financial Advisor”, and a summary of the key findings of the due diligence of AXIS’ business prepared by PartnerRe’s senior management and review of the strategic rationale and risks associated with the transaction. At the meeting, Mr. Montupet reviewed the course of negotiations with AXIS since the last board meeting. Members of PartnerRe’s senior management reported that they had completed the due diligence of financial, operational, legal and business aspects of AXIS, and discussed in detail, among other things, the strategic, operational and financial rationale of the proposed transaction, key considerations for the PartnerRe board of directors in connection with the proposed transaction, key findings from their due diligence of AXIS, estimated cost synergies and capital efficiencies and the effect of the proposed transaction on enhancing the combined company’s ability to effectively channel third party capital. A representative of Credit Suisse presented to the PartnerRe board of directors various financial analyses prepared by Credit Suisse, as further described below under “The Amalgamation─Opinion of PartnerRe’s Financial Advisor”, in connection with the proposed transaction. In connection with the deliberations of the PartnerRe board of directors, Credit Suisse then delivered to the PartnerRe board of directors its oral opinion, which was confirmed by delivery of a written opinion dated January 25, 2015, to the effect that, as of such date and based upon and subject to the assumptions, procedures, factors, qualifications and limitations set forth in such opinion, the exchange ratio pursuant to the Draft Agreement was fair, from a financial point of view, to PartnerRe and its common shareholders, as more fully described below under “The Amalgamation─Opinion of PartnerRe’s Financial Advisor”. A representative of Davis Polk summarized the proposed transaction structure, governance matters, key terms of the definitive transaction documents and the expected closing timeline for the benefit of the PartnerRe board of directors. A representative of Appleby also reviewed with the PartnerRe board of directors the fiduciary duties of the directors under Bermuda law and other Bermuda law aspects of the proposed transaction. After considering the proposed terms of the Draft Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby and the various presentations of its legal and financial advisors and senior management team of PartnerRe, and taking into consideration the matters discussed during that meeting and prior meetings and briefings of the PartnerRe board of directors, the PartnerRe Transaction Committee and prior discussions with PartnerRe’s senior management, including the factors described under “The Amalgamation─PartnerRe’s Reasons for the Amalgamation and Recommendation of PartnerRe’s Board of Directors” below, the PartnerRe board of directors unanimously resolved that the proposed amalgamation, on the terms and conditions set forth in the Draft Agreement, was in the best interest of PartnerRe and its shareholders and approved the proposed amalgamation, recommended adoption of the Draft Agreement by PartnerRe’s shareholders and authorized PartnerRe to enter into the Draft Agreement.
At the same meeting, the PartnerRe board of directors approved the appointment of Mr. Zwiener, effective immediately, as interim Chief Executive Officer of PartnerRe as well as a separation agreement with Mr. Miranthis.
Also, on January 25, 2015, the AXIS board of directors met (with three directors participating by video or audio conference) with members of management and representatives of Goldman Sachs, Simpson Thacher and AXIS’ Bermuda Counsel, Conyers Dill & Pearman Limited (“Conyers”). Prior to the meeting, members of the AXIS board of directors had received a set of meeting materials from the AXIS management and AXIS’ financial and legal advisors, including certain financial analyses of the proposed transaction prepared by Goldman Sachs, a summary of material conditions and terms of the proposed amalgamation agreement prepared by Simpson Thacher and a summary of the fiduciary duties of the AXIS board of directors under Bermuda law prepared by Conyers. Members of AXIS management discussed their due diligence findings and their determination of potential cost synergies from the transaction and responded to questions from the directors with respect thereto. Representatives of Goldman Sachs reviewed its financial analysis of the proposed transaction and answered questions from the meeting participants in connection therewith. The full text of the written opinion of Goldman Sachs is attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus, is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety, and is further described in the section titled “The Amalgamation—Opinion of AXIS’ Financial Advisor.” The directors discussed the reasons for the transaction and challenges of the transaction, reexamined the key financial assumptions made, the potential for regulatory or other material impediments to closing. Simpson Thacher addressed and responded to questions from the directors regarding the summary of deal terms previously provided to the AXIS board of directors. Representatives of Conyers reviewed with the AXIS board of directors its fiduciary duties in connection with the proposed transaction under Bermuda law. A representative of Goldman Sachs then delivered to the AXIS board of directors its oral opinion, which was confirmed by delivery of a written opinion dated January 25, 2015, as of that date and based upon and subject to the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and limitations stated therein the Company exchange ratio pursuant to the Draft Agreement was fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders (other than PartnerRe and its affiliates) of AXIS common shares. At the meeting the AXIS board of directors also reviewed the expected senior leadership team of the amalgamated company which included, in addition to Mr. Benchimol, Messrs. Joseph Henry as Chief Financial Officer (currently Chief Financial Officer of AXIS), William Babcock, currently Chief Financial Officer of PartnerRe, as Deputy Chief Financial Officer of Newco and Lead Integration Officer and who would assume the role of Chief Financial Officer of Newco upon the retirement of Mr. Henry in July 2016, Peter Wilson as Chief Executive Officer of Insurance (currently Chief Executive Officer of AXIS Insurance), Chris DiSipio as Chief Executive Officer of Life, Accident and Health (currently Chief Executive Officer of AXIS Accident and Health), Emmanuel Clarke as Chief Executive Officer of Reinsurance (currently Chief Executive Officer of PartnerRe Global) and John (Jay) Nichols as Executive Vice President of Strategic Business Development and Capital Solutions (currently Chief Executive Officer of AXIS Re). Following a discussion of the proposed transaction, which included the factors described under “The Amalgamation—AXIS’ Reasons for the Amalgamation and Recommendation of AXIS’ Board of Directors” below, the AXIS board of directors unanimously voted to approve the Draft Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby and authorized management of AXIS to take action designed to accomplish the transactions contemplated thereby.
Later the same day, the Draft Agreement was executed and the merger of equals was announced through a joint press release.
The PartnerRe board of directors believes that the amalgamation agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the amalgamation, are advisable and fair to and in the best interests of PartnerRe and its shareholders. Accordingly, the PartnerRe board of directors has approved the amalgamation agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, and unanimously recommends that the PartnerRe shareholders vote “FOR” adoption of the amalgamation agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the amalgamation.
As described above under the section titled “Background of the Amalgamation,” the PartnerRe board of directors, prior to and in reaching its decision at its meeting on January 25, 2015 to approve the Draft Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, consulted with PartnerRe’s management and financial and legal advisors and considered a variety of potentially positive factors relating to the amalgamation, including, but not limited to, the following:
Strategic Reasons
| · | the transaction represents a unique opportunity to implement PartnerRe’s long-term strategic plan |
| · | the transaction represents an attractive route to entering into the important primary insurance business with an established global leader and to diversifying PartnerRe’s exposure to the reinsurance industry; |
| · | consideration of current and future industry trends and the risks to PartnerRe’s ability to execute its strategic plan as a stand-alone entity, including the impact of continuing consolidation in the reinsurance industry and increasing competitive pricing from, among other things, consolidation of brokers and increasing participation in catastrophe markets by alternative capital sources; |
| · | the superior future earnings and growth prospects as an amalgamated company means that it will be better able to withstand and oversee the substantial challenges facing each company and the industry more generally; |
| · | the potential to increase return on equity for holders over the long term and be accretive to both companies’ earnings and to both companies’ shareholders in terms of book value per converted share after the amalgamation; |
| · | consideration of other alternatives to the transaction available to PartnerRe, including remaining a stand-alone entity, seeking to grow in the reinsurance market through the acquisition of new reinsurance businesses, the acquisition of a standalone pure primary insurance business, or a combination of the foregoing, or the sale of it or substantially all of its assets to a third-party; |
Business of the Amalgamated Company
| · | the transaction will create a top 5 global property and casualty reinsurance leader, and a leader in the broker-based reinsurance distribution channel, with premiums in excess of $10 billion, cash and invested assets of approximately of $32 billion, shareholders’ equity over $13 billion and total capitalization over $14 billion; |
| · | the possible significant synergies in the areas of reduced public company costs, consolidated corporate governance, reduced labor and shared platform costs estimated to be at least $200 million, plus part of the cost reductions previously announced by AXIS and corresponding impact on the amalgamated company’s earnings, and the belief that the amalgamated company would have superior future earnings and growth prospects than the entities alone; |
| · | the amalgamated company would have greater capital efficiency and enhanced ability to respond to competitive pressures, greater diversification opportunities, increased opportunity to compete profitably and to grow its business or return additional funds to shareholders; |
| · | the amalgamated company would be much better positioned than each standalone company to consider and pursue future acquisitions; |
| · | the potential to create a leading, diversified insurance and reinsurance company with global reach, including greater product offerings and improved market positions; |
| · | the amalgamated company will have a more diversified pool of underwriting risk by product and geography (reducing volatility of earnings and cash flows and delivering more stable results under a wider range of market conditions); |
| · | the amalgamated company should have less concentrated distribution relationships and an improved trading relevance; |
| · | an increased customer base and potential to attract new customers because of the amalgamated company’s greater scale, scope and reach; |
| · | the amalgamated company should have low balance sheet risk given both entities’ high quality investment portfolio and prudent reserving philosophies; |
| · | the enhanced ability to access third-party capital to fund risks and generate income; |
| · | the belief that the amalgamated company will benefit from strong financial strength ratings; |
| · | the knowledge that each company has of its own (and of the other company’s) business, operations, financial condition, earnings and prospects, including the results of the company’s due diligence review of the other company; |
| · | the transaction will preserve the existing tax structures and treatments of each party; |
Terms of the Transaction
| · | the structure of the transaction as a “merger of equals:” |
| o | seven of 14 members of the new company’s board of directors will be designated by PartnerRe; |
| o | Chairman of the board of directors will be designated by PartnerRe; |
| o | Chief Executive Offier will be AXIS’ current Chief Executive Offier; |
| o | key members of PartnerRe’s management and board of directors would continue with the new company; |
| o | PartnerRe shareholders would hold 51.6% of the amalgamated company, on a fully diluted basis, following consummation of the amalgamation; |
| o | the amalgamated company’s board committee assignments would be split evenly among designees from both PartnerRe and AXIS’ boards, with PartnerRe designees as chairpersons of three of the six committees; |
| · | the fact that the exchange ratio of 2.18 shares of the amalgamated company for each PartnerRe share is fixed, consistent with market practice for combinations of this type, and provides certainty to shareholders of both entities as to their aggregate pro forma percentage ownership of the amalgamated company; |
| · | the expectation that the amalgamation would be treated as a tax-free reorganization for U.S. federal income tax purposes, except with respect to cash received in lieu of fractional shares; |
| · | detailed financial analysis and other information with respect to PartnerRe and AXIS presented by management and Credit Suisse, including Credit Suisse’s opinion to the effect that, as of the date of the opinion, and based on and subject to the various assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the review undertaken, the PartnerRe exchange ratio provided for in the amalgamation was fair, from a financial point of view, to holders of PartnerRe common shares. A copy of Credit Suisse’s written opinion is attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus as Annex B; |
Management Teams
| · | each of PartnerRe’s and AXIS’ highly experienced management teams with extensive industry experience in facets of the insurance and reinsurance industry; |
| · | the similar business and management approaches of each of PartnerRe and AXIS, including emphasis on independent agents and brokers and performance-based cultures, will ease integration process; |
| · | the belief that there would be limited integration risk due to the similar risk cultures of the two companies with respect to underwriting discipline and risk management and due to the familiarity that the amalgamated company’s Chief Executive Offier has with the management team and operations of both the PartnerRe and AXIS businesses; |
| · | the fact that key members of the AXIS management team have worked for both companies and that many employees of both companies know each other due to the proximate location of the two companies; |
| · | the historical and current information about each of the companies and their business prospects, financial performance and condition, technology, management and competitive positions; |
Terms of the amalgamation agreement
| · | the specific terms of the amalgamation agreement, including: |
| o | PartnerRe’s ability, under certain circumstances, to consider and respond to an unsolicited proposal for the acquisition of 15% or more of the shares or assets of PartnerRe or engage in discussions or negotiations with the third-party making such a proposal, in each case if the PartnerRe board of directors determines in good faith (after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisor) that such “acquisition proposal” either constitutes or is reasonably likely to result in a “superior proposal” (as such terms are defined and described in the section titled “—The Amalgamation Agreement—No Solicitation of Acquisition Proposals”); |
| o | the ability of the PartnerRe board of directors to change its recommendation that PartnerRe shareholders vote in favor of adoption of the amalgamation agreement if, in response to an acquisition proposal, the PartnerRe board of directors has determined in good faith (after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisors) that the failure to take such action would violate the directors’ fiduciary duties under applicable law and the PartnerRe board |
| | of directors had determined in good faith (after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisors) that such proposal constitutes a superior proposal (see the section titled “The Amalgamation Agreement—No Solicitation of Acquisition Proposals”; |
| o | the reciprocal requirement that the amalgamation agreement be submitted to a vote of the shareholders of both companies; |
| o | the fact that in certain circumstances, if the transaction is not consummated, PartnerRe will be entitled to receive a termination fee of up to $250 million and be reimbursed for certain expenses incurred by PartnerRe in connection with the amalgamation (up to $35 million); |
| · | the fact that the amalgamation agreement allows PartnerRe to continue to declare and pay regular quarterly cash dividends consistent with past practice; |
| · | the likelihood that the amalgamation will be consummated because of the limited number of conditions to the amalgamation and each party’s commitment to obtain regulatory approvals; |
| · | the requirement under Bermuda law that if the amalgamation is approved by shareholders, those who do not vote in favor of approval have the right to demand appraisal of their shares pursuant to Bermuda law; and |
| · | the lack of any financing requirement or condition to the amalgamation. |
In the course of its deliberations, the PartnerRe board of directors, in consultation with PartnerRe management and legal and financial advisors, also considered a variety of risks and other potentially negative factors relating to the amalgamation, including the following:
| · | the risk that the potential benefits sought in the amalgamation, including anticipated synergies, might not be realized; |
| · | the possibility that the amalgamation might not be completed, or that the consummation might be delayed; |
| · | the risk that despite the efforts of the amalgamated company, key technical and management personnel might not remain employed by the amalgamated company; |
| · | the loss of PartnerRe’s Chief Executive Offier and the need for the PartnerRe board of directors to appoint an interim Chief Executive Offier for the period up to the closing of the transaction; |
| · | the fact that, at the time the PartnerRe board of directors approved the transaction, a conclusion had not been reached on which party would be the accounting acquirer or the accounting consequences thereof; |
| · | the risk of diverting management focus and resources from other strategic opportunities and operational matters while implementing the amalgamation; |
| · | the risk that either PartnerRe shareholders or AXIS shareholders may fail to adopt the amalgamation agreement and approve the transactions contemplated by the amalgamation agreement; |
| · | the potential negative effect of the pendency of the amalgamation on PartnerRe’s business and relationships with customers, vendors, business partners and employees, including the risk that key employees might not choose to remain employed with PartnerRe prior to the consummation of the amalgamation, regardless of whether or not the amalgamation is completed; |
| · | the fact that AXIS’ current loss reserve provisions may not be as expected; |
| · | the risk that governmental entities may oppose or refuse to approve the amalgamation or impose conditions on PartnerRe and/or AXIS prior to approving the amalgamation; |
| · | the specific terms of the amalgamation agreement, including: |
| o | the terms of the amalgamation agreement placing certain limitations on the ability of PartnerRe to initiate, solicit or take any action to knowingly facilitate or knowingly encourage any inquiries or requests for information by a third-party with respect to an acquisition proposal and to furnish non-public information to, or engage in discussions or negotiations with, a third-party interested in pursuing an alternative business combination transaction; |
| o | the fact that PartnerRe must pay AXIS a termination fee of $250 million and reimburse certain expenses incurred by AXIS in connection with the amalgamation (up to $35 million) if the amalgamation agreement is terminated under certain circumstances, or which may become payable following a termination of the amalgamation agreement in circumstances where no |
| | alternative transaction or superior proposal is ultimately consummated (which fee the PartnerRe board of directors determined was reasonable and customary); |
| o | that if PartnerRe’s shareholders vote against the proposal to adopt the amalgamation agreement, PartnerRe may be required to pay AXIS a termination fee of $55 million and reimburse certain expenses incurred by AXIS in connection with the amalgamation (up to $35 million) (which fee the PartnerRe board of directors determined was reasonable and customary); |
| o | the fact that PartnerRe is required to put the proposal to adopt the amalgamation agreement to a vote of its shareholders in all circumstances, including if the PartnerRe board of directors has changed its recommendation; |
| o | the fact that PartnerRe does not have the right under the terms of the amalgamation agreement to change its recommendation in circumstances not involving a superior proposal; |
| o | the restrictions on the conduct of PartnerRe’s business during the pendency of the amalgamation; and |
| · | various other factors associated with the amalgamation and the businesses of PartnerRe and the amalgamated company described in the section titled “Risk Factors”. |
The PartnerRe board of directors concluded, however, that these negative factors could be managed or mitigated by PartnerRe or by the amalgamated company or were either unlikely to occur or unlikely to have a material impact on the amalgamation or the amalgamated company. Further, the PartnerRe board of directors considered each of the restrictions that the terms of the amalgamation agreement placed on PartnerRe’s business and its ability to seek or consummate an alternative business combination and concluded that these restrictions were reasonable and customary in a transaction of this nature. Overall, the PartnerRe board of directors concluded that the potentially negative factors associated with the amalgamation were outweighed by the potential benefits of the amalgamation.
The foregoing discussion of the factors considered by the PartnerRe board of directors is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather a summary of the material factors considered by the PartnerRe board of directors. In reaching its decision to approve and adopt the amalgamation agreement, including the amalgamation and other transactions contemplated by the amalgamation agreement, the PartnerRe board of directors did not quantify or assign any relative weights to the factors considered, and individual directors may have given different weights to different factors. The PartnerRe board of directors considered the various factors as a whole, including discussions with, and questioning of, PartnerRe management and PartnerRe’s financial and legal advisors, and overall considered the factors to be favorable to, and to support, its determination.
The foregoing discussion of the information and factors considered by PartnerRe’s board of directors is forward-looking in nature. This information should be read in light of the factors described under the section titled “Forward-Looking Statements” included elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
In deciding to approve the amalgamation agreement and to recommend approval of the amalgamation to AXIS’ shareholders, AXIS’ board of directors considered a number of factors. Based on its experience in, and understanding of, opportunities related to the reinsurance and insurance industries and based on the due diligence of PartnerRe conducted by AXIS’ management, AXIS’ board of directors believes combining AXIS and PartnerRe and
leveraging their complementary strengths will deliver greater value to its stakeholders by significantly enhancing its scale, strategic flexibility, talent, capital, and operating efficiencies. With added scale, particularly in the reinsurance business, and stronger positioning across three major businesses of the amalgamated company, the amalgamation offers greater flexibility to optimize both growth and profitability. The amalgamated company’s reinsurance business will be positioned as a top five global property and casualty reinsurance franchise and a leading broker-based reinsurer. AXIS’ global specialty insurance business would benefit immediately from additional revenues and expanded geographic distribution, and with the backing of a much larger capital base, will have significant incremental ability to invest in growth. The amalgamated company’s global specialty insurance business will have in excess of $2.5 billion in premiums across a diversified array of product lines. Achievement of targeted returns in AXIS’ stand-alone Accident and Health initiative would be accelerated and strongly complemented by the life, accident and health business of PartnerRe as there is minimal overlap. The combined $1.5 billion life accident and health business would rank among the top 10 global life reinsurers and among the top three accident and health reinsurers in the United States. AXIS’ board of directors also considered that these better-positioned businesses would be harnessed to the significantly greater combined financial resources of AXIS and PartnerRe. The combination of AXIS and PartnerRe will produce one of the strongest balance sheets in the industry with approximately $13 billion in shareholders’ equity, greater than $14 billion in total capital, and approximately $32 billion in cash and invested assets. The new company is expected to be characterized by a strong ability to generate and deploy capital as a result of its combined earnings power (driven by enhanced market positioning, expense savings and other synergies), capital efficiencies made possible by the transaction and increased use of third party capital to leverage larger production capabilities.
For these foregoing reasons and the additional reasons set forth below, AXIS’ board of directors believed these benefits outweighed the risks associated with the amalgamation. In view of the number and wide variety of factors considered in connection with its evaluation of the amalgamation, AXIS’ board of directors did not attempt to quantify or otherwise assign relative weights to the specific factors it considered in reaching its determination, and individual directors may have given different weight to different information and factors. AXIS’ board of directors viewed its approval and recommendation of the amalgamation as being based on the totality of the information and factors presented to and considered by it. In reaching its decision, AXIS’ board of directors consulted with AXIS’ management with respect to strategic and operational matters. AXIS’ board of directors also consulted with its financial advisor, Goldman Sachs, with respect to the financial aspects of the transaction and AXIS’ legal advisors with respect to the amalgamation agreement and related issues. In the course of making the above determinations and recommendations, AXIS’ board of directors considered a number of factors weighing in favor of the amalgamation, each of which AXIS’ board of directors believes supported its decision, including the following:
Potential Benefits of the Amalgamated Company
| · | AXIS’ board of directors’ belief, based on its analysis and understanding of AXIS’ (on a stand-alone basis) and the amalgamated company’s potential future business, operations, financial performance, financial condition, earnings and future prospects, that the amalgamated company will have: |
| · | a diversified and balanced business mix with significant product depth, including a top five global reinsurer, a $2.5 billion specialty insurance underwriting business and a highly successful and growing life, accident and health franchise with a strong global footprint; |
| · | enhanced ability to provide highly valued solutions for clients and partners through the combined expert knowledge of complex risks, greater access to various forms of capital and the ability to provide greater capacity; |
| · | a highly experienced management team that will be led by Albert Benchimol, who has significant knowledge of the businesses of both AXIS and PartnerRe, and will include key AXIS personnel in senior management positions; |
| · | underwriting teams with long-standing industry knowledge and relationships; |
| · | an experienced board of directors that will include seven directors designated by AXIS; |
| · | greater financial strength and flexibility; |
| · | total, pre-tax expense synergies are estimated to be at least $200 million, that are expected to be substantially realizable within 18 months from the closing date of the amalgamation, and approximately $25 million, or 50% of the expense savings that AXIS originally expected to obtain from AXIS’ own expense optimization efforts, are expected to still be realizable in addition to the $200 million of merger-related synergies; and |
| · | meaningful accretion to earnings and return on equity for shareholders; |
| · | AXIS’ board of directors’ belief, based on: (1) discussions with members of AXIS’ management concerning their interactions with PartnerRe during the due diligence process and negotiations related to the amalgamation, (2) AXIS’ analysis and understanding of PartnerRe’s approach to underwriting and (3) the experience of PartnerRe’s management team, that AXIS and PartnerRe have compatible cultures, which should help ease the process of integrating the two companies; |
| · | AXIS’ board of directors’ belief that the increased size and scope of the amalgamated company will not adversely impact or change AXIS’ strategy, philosophy or culture, stability in executive management, risk management culture and enterprise risk management framework; |
| · | consideration of other alternatives to the transaction available to AXIS, including remaining a stand-alone entity; |
| · | the amalgamated company would be much better positioned than each standalone company to consider and pursue future acquisitions; |
| · | the belief that the amalgamated company will benefit from strong financial strength ratings; |
| · | a more diversified pool of underwriting risk by product and geography (reducing volatility of earnings and cash flows and delivering more stable results under a wider range of market conditions); |
| · | an increased customer base and potential to attract new customers because of the amalgamated company’s greater scale, scope and reach; |
| · | the amalgamated company would have greater capital efficiency and enhanced ability to respond to competitive pressures, greater diversification opportunities, increased opportunity to compete profitably and to grow its business or return additional funds to shareholders; |
The Amalgamation Consideration
| · | the fact that the holders of AXIS’ common shares will own approximately 48.4% of the amalgamated company, on a fully diluted basis, after the transaction is completed, in line with AXIS’ relative contribution of tangible book value as well as other financial metrics; |
| · | the fact that the fixed exchange ratio of one common share of the amalgamated company for each AXIS common share and 2.18 common shares of the amalgamated company for each PartnerRe common share, and the other terms and conditions of the amalgamation agreement, including the termination provisions, resulted from extensive arm’s-length negotiations between AXIS and its advisors, on the one hand, and PartnerRe and its advisors, on the other hand; |
| · | the fact that at the time the amalgamation agreement was negotiated key common stock trading multiples of both AXIS and PartnerRe were approximately the same; |
| · | the fact that AXIS’ board of directors received an opinion from Goldman Sachs, that as of January 25, 2015, and based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions stated in such opinion, the AXIS exchange ratio pursuant to the amalgamation agreement was fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders (other than PartnerRe and its affiliates) of AXIS common shares, as described in the section of this joint proxy/prospectus titled “ —Opinion of AXIS’ Financial Advisor”; |
| · | the fact that, because AXIS’ shareholders will own common shares of the amalgamated company, AXIS shareholders will have a meaningful opportunity to participate in any appreciation in the amalgamated company’s share price; |
Certain Provisions of the Amalgamation Agreement
| · | the fact that the amalgamation agreement requires PartnerRe to use reasonable best efforts to obtain approvals from governmental entities that are required to complete the transaction; |
| · | the fact that the amalgamation agreement allows AXIS’ board of directors to modify or withdraw its recommendation of the amalgamation, provided that following such a modification or withdrawal PartnerRe may terminate the amalgamation agreement and receive a termination fee, as described in the section of this joint proxy/prospectus titled “The Amalgamation Agreement—Termination of the Amalgamation Agreement”; |
| · | the fact that in certain circumstances, if the transaction is not consummated, AXIS will be entitled to receive a termination fee of up to $250 million and be reimbursed for certain expenses incurred by AXIS in connection with the amalgamation (up to $35 million), as described in the section of this joint proxy/prospectus titled “The Amalgamation Agreement—Termination of the Amalgamation Agreement”; |
| · | the fact that the non-solicitation provisions in the amalgamation agreement: |
| · | restrict, subject to certain exceptions, PartnerRe’s ability to respond to third party acquisition proposals; |
| · | restrict PartnerRe from terminating the amalgamation agreement to accept a superior proposal; |
| · | require PartnerRe to submit the transactions contemplated by the amalgamation agreement to a vote of its shareholders, all as described in the section of this joint proxy/prospectus titled “The Amalgamation Agreement—Restrictions on Solicitation of Takeover Proposals by AXIS and PartnerRe”; |
Likelihood of Consummating the Amalgamation
| · | the fact that no external financing is required for the transaction; |
| · | AXIS’ board of directors’ belief that the conditions to closing as described in the section of this joint proxy/prospectus titled “The Amalgamation Agreement—Conditions to the Amalgamation” are capable of being satisfied; |
| · | AXIS’ board of directors’ belief, based on advice from outside legal counsel, that the amalgamation is likely to receive necessary regulatory approvals in a relatively timely manner without resulting in a regulatory material adverse effect; |
Certain Shareholder Safeguards
| | the fact that AXIS’ board of directors consulted with its legal counsel, Simpson Thacher and Conyers and its financial advisor, Goldman Sachs, in evaluating, negotiating, recommending and adopting the terms of the amalgamation agreement; |
| | the fact that the transaction will only occur if it is approved by the AXIS shareholders at the AXIS special general meeting and the fact that if the amalgamation is approved those AXIS shareholders who do not vote in favor of the amalgamation proposal will have the right to demand appraisal of their AXIS shares pursuant to Bermuda law; |
Additional Considerations
| · | the historical and current prices of the AXIS common shares and the PartnerRe common shares; |
| · | the fact that the amalgamation would allow AXIS to meaningfully further its strategic objectives to increase capital and expand operations; |
| · | the fact that the amalgamation agreement permits AXIS to continue to declare and pay regular quarterly cash dividends similar to its current levels as well as a pro rata dividend in the quarter in which the transaction is completed; |
| · | the fact that the amalgamation will provide the amalgamated company with greater capital and resources in a market environment where there appears to be increasing consolidation in the insurance and reinsurance industries; |
| · | the fact that PartnerRe has a high quality balance sheet including a high-quality and highly liquid investment portfolio and strong reserves; |
| · | the fact that PartnerRe’s book of business is entirely reinsurance—a business that AXIS understands well—and does not contain direct insurance or other business lines; |
| · | the satisfactory results of AXIS’ management’s due diligence review of PartnerRe’s business, results of operations, financial condition, earnings and return to shareholders; |
| · | the recommendation of AXIS’ senior management in favor of the amalgamation; |
| · | the expectation that the amalgamation would be treated as a tax-free reorganization for U.S. federal income tax purposes, except with respect to cash received in lieu of fractional shares; |
| · | the fact that there will be ongoing representation of certain independent directors of AXIS on the amalgamated company’s board of directors, and the fact that AXIS’ senior management, including its Chief Executive Officer, will play a meaningful role in the management of the amalgamated company coupled with the experience and expertise of PartnerRe’s employees. |
Risk Considerations
AXIS’ board of directors considered the potential risks in making its determination and recommendation, including the following:
| · | AXIS’ board of directors’ consideration, based on AXIS’ due diligence in connection with the amalgamation, of the potential risks related to the impact of the amalgamation on the amalgamated company, including the effect of the amalgamation on change in control provisions under AXIS and PartnerRe’s reinsurance and insurance agreements, the risks associated with pending litigation and claims, the impact of goodwill expenses, the challenges of harmonizing employee compensation and benefit plans and other commitments and contingencies and the fact that the amalgamation will cause acceleration of vesting with respect to certain of PartnerRe’s equity incentive plans as well as potentially give rise to certain change of control payments under certain of PartnerRe’s employee benefit arrangements as described in “—Interests of PartnerRe Directors and Executive Officers in the Amalgamation”; |
| · | the effect of the public announcement of the amalgamation on AXIS’ share price if AXIS shareholders do not view the amalgamation positively; |
| · | the fact that PartnerRe’s current loss reserve provisions may not be as expected; |
| · | the existing and expected industry trends in the reinsurance industry, including the effects of ongoing consolidation in the reinsurance industry and increasingly competitive pricing among reinsurers; |
| · | the potential disruption to AXIS’ business that could result from the announcement of the amalgamation, including relationships with customers, vendors and business partners, the diversion of management and employee attention and employee attrition; |
| · | the possibility that the amalgamation might not be completed and the risks and costs to AXIS if the amalgamation is not completed, including the potential effect of the resulting public announcement of termination of the amalgamation agreement on, among other things, the market price for AXIS common shares, its operating results, its ability to attract and retain key personnel and agents and its ability to complete an alternative transaction. The amalgamation might not be completed, or might be unduly delayed, due to: |
| · | difficulties in obtaining the requisite shareholder approvals; |
| · | difficulties in obtaining requisite regulatory approvals or regulatory authorities’ withholding consent or seeking to block the amalgamation; |
| · | the possibility that one or more of either AXIS’ or PartnerRe’s Bermuda insurance subsidiaries will not have a Financial Strength Rating of at least “A-” from A.M. Best; |
| · | the occurrence of a material adverse effect on either company’s business; |
| · | the fact that, subject to compliance with certain obligations under the amalgamation agreement, PartnerRe’s board of directors may modify or withdraw its recommendation of the amalgamation, provided that following such a change AXIS may terminate the amalgamation agreement and receive a termination fee, as described in “The Amalgamation Agreement—Termination of the Amalgamation Agreement”; |
| · | the fact that the non-solicitation provisions in the amalgamation agreement: |
| · | restrict AXIS from soliciting, considering or responding to third party acquisition proposals; |
| · | restrict, subject to certain exceptions, AXIS’ ability to respond to third party acquisition proposals; |
| · | restrict AXIS from terminating the amalgamation agreement to accept a superior proposal; |
| · | the fact that AXIS does not have the right under the terms of the amalgamation agreement to change its recommendation in circumstances not involving a superior proposal; |
| · | require AXIS to submit the transactions contemplated by the amalgamation agreement to a vote of its shareholders, all as described in “The Amalgamation Agreement—Restrictions on Solicitation of Takeover Proposals by AXIS and PartnerRe”; |
| · | the fact that AXIS may be required to pay PartnerRe the termination fee of $250 million if AXIS’ board of directors modifies or withdraws its recommendation or, in certain instances, if AXIS enters into or consummates a transaction with a third party, as described in “The Amalgamation Agreement—Termination of the Amalgamation Agreement” impacting AXIS’ ability to complete an alternative transaction; |
| · | the fact that AXIS may be required to pay PartnerRe the no approval fee of up to $55 million if AXIS’ shareholders fail to approve the amalgamation (and up to an aggregate of $250 million if AXIS enters into or consummates another transaction within twelve months of a termination related thereto), as described in “The Amalgamation Agreement—Termination of the Amalgamation Agreement—Effects of Termination; Remedies”; |
| · | the fact that in the event that it is required to pay the termination fee or the no approval fee AXIS will also be required to reimburse PartnerRe for its out-of-pocket fees, costs, obligations owed to third parties and expenses incurred in connection with the amalgamation, up to a maximum of $35 million as described in “The Amalgamation Agreement Termination of the Amalgamation Agreement”; |
| · | the possibility that the AXIS shareholders or the PartnerRe shareholders may not react favorably to the amalgamation, and the execution risk and additional costs that would be required to complete the amalgamation as a result of any legal actions or appraisal actions brought by the AXIS shareholders or the PartnerRe shareholders; |
| · | the fact that certain directors and officers of AXIS have interests in the amalgamation that are different from, or in addition to, those of AXIS’ shareholders generally, as described in “—Interests of AXIS Directors and Executive Officers in the Amalgamation”; |
| · | the fact that the restrictions on the conduct of AXIS’ business prior to the closing, requiring AXIS to conduct its business in the ordinary course, subject to additional specific limitations, which may delay or prevent AXIS from undertaking business opportunities that may arise pending consummation of the amalgamation; |
| · | the challenges of combining AXIS’ business with PartnerRe’s, including risk management, accounting and other challenges, and the risk of diverting management focus and resources for an extended period of time to accomplish this combination; |
| · | the risk that despite the efforts of the amalgamated company, key personnel might not remain employed by the amalgamated company; |
| · | the possibility that, if the amalgamation takes longer to complete than anticipated, the amalgamated company may not be able to fully integrate AXIS’ and PartnerRe’s operations as quickly as expected or at all; |
| · | the possibility that the benefits of the transaction to AXIS may be significantly less than anticipated; |
| · | the transaction costs that have been and will be incurred in connection with the amalgamation; |
| · | until the closing, PartnerRe will operate in accordance with its own distinct business practices. As a result, PartnerRe may assume risks or make decisions that, while consistent with its own past practice, may not be the same as AXIS’ approach to its business. While the specifically negotiated contractual provisions requiring that PartnerRe operate its business during the interim period in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practices mitigates AXIS’ exposure to some degree, these risks are not eliminated and will only become more acute the more prolonged the delay in closing; and |
| · | the risks described in this joint proxy statement/prospectus under “Risk Factors.” |
PartnerRe management does not as a matter of course make public projections as to future performance or earnings and is especially wary of making projections for extended periods due to the significant unpredictability inherent in its businesses. However, PartnerRe provided, among other information, certain financial projections prepared by PartnerRe management to AXIS in connection with its evaluation of the amalgamation and to Credit Suisse, the financial advisor to the PartnerRe board of directors. In addition, PartnerRe management worked with AXIS’ management to prepare an estimate of possible expense synergy savings that could arise as a result of the amalgamation. The financial projections and the estimated synergies were not developed for the purposes of providing earnings guidance.
The financial projections represent only one scenario in a wide range of potential outcomes. While presented with numeric specificity, the projections and the estimated synergies reflect numerous estimates and assumptions with respect to industry performance, general business, economic, regulatory, market and financial conditions and other future events, as well as matters specific to PartnerRe’s business, all of which are inherently uncertain and difficult to predict and many of which are beyond PartnerRe’s control. These financial projections and estimated synergies are subjective in many respects and thus are susceptible to multiple interpretations and periodic revisions based on actual experience and business developments. These projections and estimated synergies may also be affected by PartnerRe’s ability to achieve strategic goals, objectives and targets over the applicable periods. As such, these financial projections and estimated synergies constitute forward-looking information and are subject to risks and uncertainties, including the various risks set forth in the sections of this joint proxy statement/prospectus titled “Forward-Looking Statements,” “Risk Factors” and “Where You Can Find More Information—PartnerRe Filings” and in PartnerRe’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 and the other reports filed by PartnerRe with the SEC. PartnerRe and AXIS shareholders should read such sections of this joint proxy statement/prospectus and such reports filed with the SEC for additional information regarding the risks inherent in forward-looking information such as the financial projections and estimated synergies. The financial projections cover multiple years and such information by its nature becomes less reliable with each successive year.
The financial projections were not prepared with a view toward public disclosure, the published guidelines of the SEC regarding projections or the guidelines established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants for preparation and presentation of prospective financial information, but, in view of PartnerRe’s management, was prepared on a reasonable basis. However, this information is not fact and should not be relied upon as being necessarily indicative of future results, and readers of this joint proxy statement/prospectus are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the prospective financial information. Neither PartnerRe’s independent registered public accounting firm, nor any other independent accountants, have compiled, examined or performed any procedures with respect to the financial projections or estimated synergies included below, nor have they expressed any opinion or any other form of assurance on such information or its achievability, and they assume no responsibility for, and disclaim any association with, the financial projections or estimated synergies. Furthermore, the financial projections and estimated synergies do not take into account any circumstances or events occurring after the date they were prepared.
Deloitte Ltd. reports incorporated by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus relate to historical financial information. They do not extend to the prospective financial information and should not be read to do so. Certain of the financial projections and estimated synergies set forth herein may be considered non-GAAP financial measures. Non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered in isolation from, or as a substitute for, financial information presented in compliance with GAAP, and non-GAAP financial measures as used in the projections or estimated synergies may not be comparable to similarly titled amounts used by other companies or persons.
The information about the projections set forth below does not give effect to the amalgamation and also does not take into account the effect of any failure of the amalgamation to be consummated.
You are strongly cautioned not to place undue reliance on the financial projections or estimated synergies set forth below. The inclusion of the projections and estimated synergies in this joint proxy statement/prospectus should not be regarded as an indication that any of PartnerRe, AXIS or their affiliates, advisors or representatives considered or consider the projections or estimated synergies to be predictive of actual future events, and the projections and estimated synergies should not be relied upon as such. None of PartnerRe, AXIS or their respective affiliates, advisors, officers, directors or representatives can give any assurance that actual results will not materially differ from the projections and estimated synergies, and none of them undertakes any obligation to update or otherwise revise or reconcile the projections or estimated synergies to reflect circumstances existing after the date such projections or estimated synergies were generated or to reflect the occurrence of future events even in the event that any or all of the assumptions underlying the projections or estimated synergies are shown to be in error. None of PartnerRe, AXIS or their respective affiliates, advisors or representatives makes any representation to any other person regarding the projections or estimated synergies. The projections and estimated synergies are not being included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus to influence a shareholder’s decision regarding how to vote on any given proposal, but because the projections and estimated synergies were provided to AXIS and Credit Suisse.
In addition to the foregoing qualifications, the following financial projections developed by PartnerRe reflect:
| · | non-life loss reserve development assumptions in consideration of actual reported experience in recent years; and |
| · | capital management assumptions, including the payment of dividends to common shareholders and common share repurchases, consistent with management’s assumptions regarding capital levels desired to support the projected business. |
These projections are for illustration purposes and should not be considered an indication of what PartnerRe may do in the future. These projections are as of January 25, 2015, the date of the amalgamation agreement.
| | Fiscal year ending December 31, | |
| | ($ in millions) | |
| | | 2015E | | | | 2016E | | | | 2017E | |
Net premiums written | | $ | 5,623 | | | $ | 5,623 | | | $ | 5,623 | |
Combined ratio, including life | | | 93.3 | % | | | 94.9 | % | | | 95.4 | % |
Operating earnings attributed to PartnerRe common shareholders | | $ | 572 | | | $ | 508 | | | $ | 479 | |
Common shareholders’ equity attributable to PartnerRe | | $ | 5,865 | | | $ | 5,913 | | | $ | 5,962 | |
PartnerRe management worked with AXIS management to estimate possible expense synergy savings resulting from the amalgamation. Total pre-tax expense synergies are estimated to be $200 million, at a minimum, and are expected to be substantially realizable within 18 months from the transaction closing date. The methods used to determine the estimated synergies were not sufficient to more precisely estimate periods in which expense synergy savings might be realized. The expense synergy estimate primarily results from estimated expense redundancies in personnel, facilities and information systems, with the most significant amounts derived from expected expense redundancies in reinsurance and holding company operations.
AXIS management does not as a matter of course make public projections as to future performance or earnings due to the significant unpredictability inherent in its businesses. However, AXIS provided, among other information, certain financial projections prepared by AXIS management to PartnerRe in connection with its evaluation of the amalgamation and to Goldman Sachs, the financial advisor to the AXIS board of directors. In addition, AXIS management worked with PartnerRe’s management to prepare an estimate of possible expense synergy savings that could arise as a result of the amalgamation. The financial projections and the estimated synergies were not developed for the purposes of providing earnings guidance.
The financial projections reflect numerous judgments, estimates and assumptions with respect to industry performance, general business, economic, regulatory, market and financial conditions and other future events, as well as matters specific to AXIS’ business, all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond the control of AXIS. The financial projections are subjective in many respects and are susceptible to multiple interpretations and periodic revisions based on actual experience and business developments. As such, the financial projections constitute forward-looking information and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results forecasted in such projections, including the various risks set forth in AXIS’ periodic reports and in the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus titled “Risk Factors.” See also the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus titled “Forward-Looking Statements.” There can be no assurance that the projected results will be realized or that actual results will not be significantly higher or lower than projected. The projections cannot be considered a reliable predictor of future results and should not be relied upon as such. The financial projections cover multiple years and such information by its nature becomes less reliable with each successive year.
The financial projections do not take into account any circumstances or events occurring after the date they were prepared, including the announcement of the proposed amalgamation. The financial projections do not take into account the effect of any failure to occur of the proposed amalgamation and should not be viewed as accurate or continuing in that context.
The financial projections were prepared solely for use in connection with evaluating the potential amalgamation and not with a view toward public disclosure, the published guidelines of the SEC regarding projections or the guidelines established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants for preparation and presentation of prospective financial information, but, in view of AXIS’ management, was prepared on a reasonable basis. However, this information is not fact and should not be relied upon as being necessarily indicative of future results, and readers to this joint proxy statement/prospectus are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the prospective financial information. Neither AXIS’ independent registered public accounting firm, nor any other independent accountants, have compiled, examined or performed any procedures with respect to the financial projections included below, nor have they expressed any opinion or any other form of assurance on such information or its achievability, and they assume no responsibility for, and disclaim any association with, the financial projections.
The inclusion of the financial projections herein is not deemed an admission or representation by AXIS that they are viewed by AXIS as material information of AXIS or the amalgamated company. These projections are not included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus in order to induce any holder of AXIS shares to vote to approve and adopt the amalgamation agreement, or the statutory amalgamation agreement and the amalgamation. AXIS does not intend to update or otherwise revise these projections to reflect circumstances existing since their preparation, to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events even in the event that any or all of the underlying assumptions are shown to be in error, or to reflect changes in general economic or industry conditions.
Certain Projected Financial Information for AXIS. In addition to the foregoing qualifications, the following financial projections developed by AXIS reflect capital management assumptions (including possible dividends and share repurchases) throughout the projection period, which include certain judgments by management in how they operate the business. These projections are for illustration purposes and should not be considered an indication of what AXIS may do in the future. These projections were prepared as of January 25, 2015, the date of the amalgamation agreement.
| | Fiscal year ending December 31, | |
| | | 2015E | | | | 2016E | | | | 2017E | |
| | ($ in millions) | |
Net premiums written | | $ | 3,994 | | | $ | 4,074 | | | $ | 4,156 | |
Combined ratio | | | 94.3 | % | | | 94.6 | % | | | 94.1 | % |
Net income available to common shareholders | | $ | 425 | | | $ | 451 | | | $ | 513 | |
Common shareholders’ equity | | $ | 5,200 | | | $ | 5,207 | | | $ | 5,215 | |
AXIS’ management worked with PartnerRe’s management to estimate the synergies that would result from the amalgamation. The total, pre-tax expense synergies are estimated to be at least $200 million, and are expected to be substantially realizable within 18 months from the closing date of the amalgamation. This estimate of expense synergies primarily results from estimated expense redundancies in personnel, facilities and information systems, particularly in reinsurance and holding company operations. In addition, approximately $25 million, or 50% of the expense savings that AXIS originally expected to obtain from AXIS’ own expense optimization efforts, is expected to still be realizable in addition to the $200 million of merger-related synergies.
PartnerRe retained Credit Suisse to act as its financial advisor in connection with the amalgamation. In connection with Credit Suisse’s engagement, the PartnerRe board of directors requested that Credit Suisse evaluate the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the holders of PartnerRe common shares of the PartnerRe exchange ratio provided for in the amalgamation. On January 25, 2015, at a meeting of the PartnerRe board of directors held to evaluate the proposed amalgamation, Credit Suisse rendered to the PartnerRe board of directors an oral opinion, confirmed by delivery of a written opinion dated January 25, 2015, to the effect that, as of that date and based on and subject to various assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the review undertaken, the PartnerRe exchange ratio provided for in the amalgamation was fair, from a financial point of view, to holders of PartnerRe common shares.
The full text of Credit Suisse’s written opinion, dated January 25, 2015, to the PartnerRe board of directors, which sets forth, among other things, the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the review undertaken by Credit Suisse in connection with such opinion, is attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus as Annex B and is incorporated into this joint proxy statement/prospectus by reference in its entirety. The description of Credit Suisse’s opinion set forth in this joint proxy statement/prospectus is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of Credit Suisse’s opinion. Credit Suisse’s opinion was provided to the PartnerRe board of directors (in its capacity as such) for its information in connection with its evaluation of the PartnerRe exchange ratio from a financial point of view to holders of PartnerRe common shares and did not address any other aspect of the amalgamation, including the relative merits of the amalgamation as compared to alternative transactions or strategies that might be available to PartnerRe or the underlying business decision of PartnerRe to proceed with the amalgamation. Credit Suisse’s opinion does not constitute advice or a recommendation to any shareholder as to how such shareholder should vote or act on any matter relating to the amalgamation or otherwise.
In arriving at its opinion, Credit Suisse reviewed a draft dated January 25, 2015 of the amalgamation agreement, certain related agreements and certain business and financial information relating to PartnerRe and AXIS. Credit Suisse also reviewed certain other information relating to PartnerRe and AXIS, including certain financial forecasts relating to PartnerRe and AXIS through 2017, prepared by and provided to or discussed with Credit Suisse by PartnerRe and AXIS and met with the management of PartnerRe and AXIS to discuss the business and prospects of PartnerRe and AXIS. See the section titled “—Certain PartnerRe Prospective Financial Information” above. Credit Suisse also considered certain financial and stock market data of PartnerRe and AXIS, and compared that data with similar data for other publicly held companies in businesses it deemed similar to those of PartnerRe and AXIS and Credit Suisse considered, to the extent publicly available, the financial terms of certain other business combinations and other transactions that have been effected or announced. Credit Suisse also considered such other information, financial studies, analyses and investigations and financial, economic and market criteria which it deemed relevant.
In connection with its review, Credit Suisse did not independently verify any of the foregoing information, and Credit Suisse assumed and relied upon such information being complete and accurate in all respects. With respect to the financial forecasts for PartnerRe and AXIS that Credit Suisse used and relied upon for purposes of its analyses and opinion, management of PartnerRe advised Credit Suisse, and Credit Suisse assumed, that such financial forecasts were reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of the management of PartnerRe and AXIS as to the future financial performance of PartnerRe and AXIS. Credit Suisse assumed, with PartnerRe’s consent, that the amalgamation would be treated as a tax-free reorganization for federal income tax purposes. Credit Suisse also assumed, with PartnerRe’s consent, that, in the course of obtaining any regulatory or third-party consents, approvals or agreements in connection with the amalgamation, no delay, limitation, restriction or condition would be imposed that would have an adverse effect on PartnerRe, AXIS or any respective subsidiary or the contemplated benefits of the amalgamation and that the amalgamation would be consummated in accordance with the terms of the amalgamation agreement without waiver, modification or amendment of any material term, condition or agreement thereof. In addition, Credit Suisse was not requested to make, and did not make, an independent evaluation or appraisal (including any actuarial appraisal) of the assets or liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of PartnerRe or AXIS, nor was Credit Suisse furnished with any such evaluations or appraisals. Credit Suisse are not legal, tax, regulatory or actuarial advisors. Credit Suisse are financial advisors only and relied upon, without independent verification, the assessment of PartnerRe and its legal, tax, regulatory and actuarial advisors with respect to legal, tax, regulatory and actuarial matters.
Credit Suisse’s opinion addressed only the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the holders of PartnerRe common shares of the PartnerRe exchange ratio and did not address any other aspect or implication of the amalgamation or any other agreement, arrangement or understanding entered into in connection with the amalgamation or otherwise, including, without limitation, the fairness of the amount or nature of, or any other aspect relating to, any compensation to any officers, directors or employees of any party to the amalgamation, or class of such persons, relative to the PartnerRe exchange ratio or otherwise. The issuance of Credit Suisse’s opinion was approved by Credit Suisse’s authorized internal committee. Credit Suisse has not undertaken, and is under no obligation, to update, revise, reaffirm or withdraw its opinion, or otherwise.
Credit Suisse’s opinion was necessarily based upon information made available to it as of the date of its opinion and financial, economic, market and other conditions as they existed and could be evaluated on that date. Credit Suisse did not express any opinion as to what the value of Newco common shares actually would be when issued to the holders of PartnerRe common shares pursuant to the amalgamation or the prices at which Newco common shares would trade at any time. Credit Suisse did not address the relative merits of the amalgamation as compared to alternative transactions or strategies that might be available to PartnerRe, nor did it address the underlying business decision of PartnerRe to proceed with the amalgamation.
In preparing its opinion to the PartnerRe board of directors, Credit Suisse performed a variety of financial and comparative analyses, including those described below. The summary of Credit Suisse’s analyses described below is not a complete description of the analyses underlying Credit Suisse’s opinion. The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process involving various determinations as to the most appropriate and relevant methods of financial analysis and the application of those methods to the particular circumstances and, therefore, a fairness opinion is not readily susceptible to partial analysis or summary description. Credit Suisse arrived at its ultimate
opinion based on the results of all analyses undertaken by it and assessed as a whole and did not draw, in isolation, conclusions from or with regard to any one factor or method of analysis. Accordingly, Credit Suisse believes that its analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of its analyses and factors or focusing on information presented in tabular format, without considering all analyses and factors or the narrative description of the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of the processes underlying its analyses and opinion.
In its analyses, Credit Suisse considered industry performance, general business, economic, market and financial conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond PartnerRe’s and AXIS’ control. No company, business or transaction used for comparative purposes in Credit Suisse’s analyses is identical to PartnerRe, AXIS or the amalgamation, and an evaluation of the results of those analyses is not entirely mathematical. Rather, the analyses involve complex considerations and judgments concerning financial and operating characteristics and other factors that could affect the public trading or other values of the companies, business segments or transactions analyzed. The estimates contained in Credit Suisse’s analyses and the ranges of valuations resulting from any particular analysis are not necessarily indicative of actual values or predictive of future results or values, which may be significantly more or less favorable than those suggested by the analyses. In addition, analyses relating to the value of businesses or securities do not purport to be appraisals or to reflect the prices at which businesses or securities actually may be sold or acquired. Accordingly, the estimates used in, and the results derived from, Credit Suisse’s analyses are inherently subject to substantial uncertainty.
Credit Suisse was not requested to, and it did not, recommend the specific consideration payable in the amalgamation, which exchange ratio was determined through negotiations between PartnerRe and AXIS, and the decision to enter into the amalgamation agreement was solely that of the PartnerRe board of directors. Credit Suisse’s opinion and financial analyses were only one of many factors considered by the PartnerRe board of directors in its evaluation of the amalgamation and should not be viewed as determinative of the views of the PartnerRe board of directors or management with respect to the amalgamation and related transactions or the PartnerRe exchange ratio.
The following is a summary of the material financial analyses reviewed with the PartnerRe board of directors on January 25, 2015 in connection with Credit Suisse’s opinion. The financial analyses summarized below include information presented in tabular format. In order to fully understand Credit Suisse’s financial analyses, the tables must be read together with the text of each summary. The tables alone do not constitute a complete description of the financial analyses. Considering the data in the tables below without considering the full narrative description of the financial analyses, including the methodologies and assumptions underlying the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of Credit Suisse’s financial analyses.
Selected Companies Analyses. Credit Suisse performed separate selected companies analyses of PartnerRe and AXIS.
PartnerRe. In performing a selected public companies analysis of PartnerRe, Credit Suisse reviewed financial and stock market information of PartnerRe and the following five selected publicly traded companies, which Credit Suisse in its professional judgment considered generally relevant for comparative purposes as publicly traded property and casualty insurance and reinsurance companies with at least 50% of premiums sourced from reinsurance, which five companies collectively are referred to as the PartnerRe selected companies:
| · | Endurance Specialty Holdings Ltd. |
| · | RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. |
Platinum Underwriters Holdings, Ltd. and Montpelier Re Holdings Ltd. were both considered, but ultimately excluded from the selected sets of comparable companies for both PartnerRe and AXIS due to the likelihood that their market valuations were being influenced by current market events. Platinum announced on November 24, 2014 that it had entered into a definitive merger agreement with RenaissanceRe under which RenaissanceRe will acquire
Platinum, and Montpelier is publicly rumored to be engaged in a sale process after an internet website published speculation to that effect on December 11, 2014. Montpelier’s share price increased approximately 6.11% from December 10 to December 11, 2014.
Credit Suisse reviewed, among other things, per share stock prices as multiples of calendar years 2015 and 2016 estimated earnings per share, referred to as EPS, book value per share and tangible book value per share. The overall low to high calendar year 2015 and calendar year 2016 estimated EPS multiples observed for the selected companies were 8.4x to 16.4x (with a mean of 11.1x and a median of 10.2x) and 8.1x to 15.7x (with a mean of 10.5x and a median of 9.4x), respectively. Credit Suisse noted that calendar year 2015 and calendar year 2016 estimated EPS multiples observed for PartnerRe were 11.9x and 12.0x, respectively, based on research analysts’ publicly available estimates. Credit Suisse then applied selected ranges of EPS multiples of 10.0x to 12.0x derived by Credit Suisse from the selected companies to corresponding data of PartnerRe based on management estimates for 2015 and 2016 earnings, and also based on Institutional Brokers’ Estimate System, or I/B/E/S, estimates for 2015. The results of this analysis are set forth below.
The overall low to high book value per share and tangible book value per share multiples observed for the selected companies were 1.00x to 1.16x (with a mean of 1.07x and a median of 1.05x) and 1.03x to 1.16x (with a mean of 1.09x and a median of 1.09x), respectively. Credit Suisse noted that book value per share and tangible book value per share multiples observed for PartnerRe were 0.94x and 1.03x, respectively. Credit Suisse then applied selected ranges of book value per share and tangible book value per share multiples of 0.95x to 1.05x and 1.00x to 1.10x, respectively, derived by Credit Suisse from the selected companies to corresponding book value and tangible book value data of PartnerRe as of September 30, 2014. The results of this analysis are set forth below.
Financial data of the selected companies were based on publicly available research analysts’ publicly available consensus estimates, public filings and other publicly available information. Financial data of PartnerRe was based on publicly available research analysts’ estimates and internal estimates of PartnerRe’s management. See the section titled “—Certain PartnerRe Prospective Financial Information” above. The foregoing analyses indicated the following approximate implied per share value reference range for PartnerRe:
Implied Valuation Per Share Based on: |
EPS (2015E I/B/E/S) | EPS (2015E management estimates) | EPS (2016E management estimates) | Price / Book Value | Price / Tangible Book Value |
$97.21-116.65 | $120.41-144.50 | $113.22-135.86 | $115.85-128.05 | $110.75-121.83 |
AXIS. In performing a selected public companies analysis of AXIS, Credit Suisse reviewed financial and stock market information of AXIS and the following ten selected publicly traded companies which Credit Suisse in its professional judgment considered generally relevant for comparative purposes as publicly traded property and casualty insurance and reinsurance companies with at least 20% of premiums sourced from reinsurance, which ten companies collectively are referred to as the AXIS selected companies:
| · | Allied World Assurance Company Limited |
| · | Aspen Insurance Holdings Limited |
| · | Endurance Specialty Holdings Ltd. |
| · | RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. |
Credit Suisse reviewed, among other things, per share stock prices as multiples of calendar years 2015 and 2016 estimated earnings per share, book value per share and tangible book value per share. The overall low to high calendar year 2015 and calendar year 2016 estimated EPS multiples observed for the selected companies were 8.4x to 31.6x (with a mean of 13.8x and a median of 11.3x) and 8.1x to 29.0x (with a mean of 13.0x and a median of 10.4x), respectively. Credit Suisse noted that calendar year 2015 and calendar year 2016 estimated EPS multiples observed for AXIS were 10.7x and 10.4x, respectively, based on research analysts’ publicly available estimates. Credit Suisse then applied selected ranges of EPS multiples of 10.0x to 12.0x derived by Credit Suisse from the selected companies to corresponding data of AXIS based on management estimates and I/B/E/S estimates for 2015, and 9.0x to 11.0x derived from the selected companies to corresponding data of AXIS based on management estimates for 2016. The results of this analysis are set forth below.
The overall low to high book value per share and tangible book value per share multiples observed for the selected companies were 0.96x to 1.42x (with a mean of 1.10x and a median of 1.04x) and 0.97x to 1.81x (with a mean of 1.18x and a median of 1.10x), respectively. Credit Suisse noted that book value per share and tangible book value per share multiples observed for AXIS were 0.99x and 1.01x, respectively. Credit Suisse then applied selected ranges of book value per share and tangible book value per share multiples of 0.95x to 1.10x and 1.00x to 1.15x, respectively, derived by Credit Suisse from the selected companies to corresponding book value and tangible book value data of AXIS as of September 30, 2014. The results of this analysis are set forth below.
Financial data of the selected companies were based on publicly available research analysts’ consensus estimates, public filings and other publicly available information. Financial data of AXIS was based on publicly available research analysts’ estimates and internal estimates of AXIS’ management. The foregoing analyses indicated the following approximate implied per share value reference range for AXIS:
Implied Valuation Per Share Based on: |
EPS (2015E I/B/E/S) | EPS (2015E management estimates) | EPS (2016E management estimates) | Price / Book Value | Price / Tangible Book Value |
$46.01-55.21 | $42.67-51.20 | $43.29-52.91 | $47.39-54.87 | $49.02-56.37 |
Based on implied per share equity value reference ranges for PartnerRe and AXIS calculated as described above, Credit Suisse calculated the following implied PartnerRe exchange ratio reference range, as compared to the PartnerRe exchange ratio provided for in the amalgamation:
Implied PartnerRe Exchange Ratio References Range Based on: | |
EPS (2015E I/B/E/S) | EPS (2015E management estimates) | EPS (2016E management estimates) | Price / Book Value | Price / Tangible Book Value | PartnerRe Exchange Ratio |
1.7607x-2.5354x | 2.3516x-3.3863x | 2.1398x-3.1383x | 2.1115x-2.7022x | 1.9646x-2.4852x | 2.18x |
Dividend Discount Analyses. Credit Suisse performed separate dividend discount analyses of PartnerRe and AXIS.
PartnerRe. In performing a dividend discount analysis of PartnerRe, Credit Suisse calculated the estimated present value of distributable cash flow that PartnerRe was forecasted to generate during calendar years ending December 31, 2015 through December 31, 2017 based upon publicly available financial forecasts relating to PartnerRe and certain other forecasts with respect to earnings per share long-term growth rate and certain other forecasts with respect to tangible assets. Credit Suisse then calculated terminal value ranges for PartnerRe by applying a range of terminal value multiples of 1.00x to 1.10x to PartnerRe’s calendar year ending December 31, 2017 estimated tangible book value, which range of multiples was selected based on the PartnerRe selected companies. The distributable cash flows and terminal values were then discounted to present values using discount rates ranging from 6.0% to 7.0%, which range of discount rates was selected based on a cost of equity analysis using the PartnerRe selected companies. The resulting analysis indicated an approximate implied per share value reference range for PartnerRe of $120.95 to $133.22.
AXIS. In performing a dividend discount analysis of AXIS, Credit Suisse calculated the estimated present value of distributable cash flow that AXIS was forecasted to generate during calendar years ending December 31, 2015 through December 31, 2017 based upon publicly available financial forecasts relating to AXIS and certain other forecasts with respect to earnings per share long-term growth rate and certain other forecasts with respect to tangible assets. Credit Suisse then calculated terminal value ranges for AXIS by applying a range of terminal value multiples of 1.00x to 1.15x to AXIS’ calendar year ending December 31, 2017 estimated tangible book value, which range of multiples was selected based on the AXIS selected companies. The distributable cash flows and terminal values were then discounted to present values using discount rates ranging from 6.0% to 7.0%, which range of discount rates was selected based on a cost of equity analysis using the AXIS selected companies. The resulting analysis indicated an approximate implied per share value reference range for AXIS of $53.26 to $60.90.
Based on implied per share equity value reference ranges for PartnerRe and AXIS calculated as described above, Credit Suisse calculated the following implied exchange ratio reference range, as compared to the PartnerRe exchange ratio provided for in the amalgamation:
Implied Exchange Ratio References Range: | PartnerRe Exchange Ratio: |
1.9860x - 2.5013x | 2.18x |
Other Factors.
Credit Suisse also noted for the board of directors of PartnerRe certain additional factors that were not considered in its financial analysis with respect to its opinion but that were referenced for informational purposes.
Specifically, Credit Suisse reviewed the closing trading price of each of PartnerRe and AXIS on January 23, 2015 of $114.14 and $49.33, respectively, and observed an implied PartnerRe exchange ratio of 2.3138x.
Credit Suisse also reviewed with the board of directors of PartnerRe the 52-week trading low and trading high ranges of each of PartnerRe and AXIS of $94.50 to $118.47 and $41.82 to $52.21, respectively, and observed a range of implied PartnerRe exchange ratios of 1.8100x to 2.8329x. Finally, Credit Suisse also reviewed with the board of directors of PartnerRe research analyst price target ranges for the share prices of PartnerRe and AXIS of $108.00 to $133.00 and $41.82 to $56.00, respectively, which implied a range of PartnerRe exchange ratios of 1.9286x to 3.1803x.
Miscellaneous.
PartnerRe selected Credit Suisse to act as its financial advisor in connection with the amalgamation based on Credit Suisse’s qualifications, experience, reputation and familiarity with PartnerRe and its business. Credit Suisse is an internationally recognized investment banking firm and is regularly engaged in the valuation of businesses and securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions, leveraged buyouts, negotiated underwritings, competitive biddings, secondary distributions of listed and unlisted securities, private placements and valuations for corporate and other purposes.
Pursuant to a general engagement letter originally entered into in December 2011, which was subsequently supplemented in May 2014 in connection with services provided by Credit Suisse in connection with PartnerRe’s consideration of a potential transaction in 2014, and then further amended in connection with services provided in relation to the amalgamation, PartnerRe has agreed to pay Credit Suisse for its financial advisor services to PartnerRe in connection with these engagements an aggregate fee of $28.0 million for its services, $750,000 of which has already been paid, a further portion of which was payable upon delivery of Credit Suisse’s opinion and approximately $25.5 million of which is contingent upon consummation of the amalgamation. PartnerRe also may, in its sole discretion, pay to Credit Suisse an additional fee of up to $2.0 million. In addition, PartnerRe has agreed to indemnify Credit Suisse and certain related parties for certain liabilities and other items arising out of or related to Credit Suisse’s engagement.
Credit Suisse and its affiliates have in the past provided investment banking and other financial services to PartnerRe and its affiliates for which Credit Suisse and its affiliates have received and would expect to receive compensation. Such services include acting as joint book running manager in connection with PartnerRe’s issuance of 5.875% Series F Non-Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares in February 2013 and providing ongoing strategic advice to PartnerRe. Credit Suisse and its affiliates also have in the past provided investment banking and
other financial services to AXIS and its affiliates, including having acted as co-manager in March 2014 in connection with AXIS’ subsidiary’s, AXIS Specialty Finance PLC, $250 million offering of 2.65% senior notes due April 1, 2019 and $250 million offering of 5.15% senior notes due April 1, 2045. In addition, an affiliate of Credit Suisse has provided a $50 million standby letter of credit, due December 31, 2016, to AXIS. Credit Suisse has earned approximately $1 million in revenue for services provided to PartnerRe, other than for fees under this engagement, and has earned less than $1 million in revenue for services provided to AXIS since January 2013. Credit Suisse and its affiliates may have provided other financial advice and services, and may in the future provide financial advice and services, to PartnerRe, AXIS and their respective affiliates for which Credit Suisse and its affiliates have received, and would expect to receive, compensation. Credit Suisse is a full-service securities firm engaged in securities trading and brokerage activities as well as providing investment banking and other financial services. In the ordinary course of business, Credit Suisse and its affiliates may acquire, hold or sell, for Credit Suisse’s and its affiliates own accounts and the accounts of customers, equity, debt and other securities and financial instruments (including bank loans and other obligations) of PartnerRe, AXIS and any other company that may be involved in the amalgamation, as well as provide investment banking and other financial services to such companies.
Goldman Sachs rendered its opinion to the AXIS board of directors that, as of January 25, 2015 and based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions set forth therein, the AXIS exchange ratio pursuant to the amalgamation agreement was fair from a financial point of view to the holders (other than PartnerRe and its affiliates) of AXIS common shares.
The full text of the written opinion of Goldman Sachs, dated January 25, 2015, which sets forth assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the review undertaken in connection with the opinion, is attached as Annex C. Goldman Sachs provided its opinion for the information and assistance of the AXIS board of directors in connection with its consideration of the amalgamation. The Goldman Sachs opinion does not constitute a recommendation as to how any holder of AXIS common shares should vote with respect to such amalgamation or any other matter.
In connection with rendering the opinion described above and performing its related financial analyses, Goldman Sachs reviewed, among other things:
• the amalgamation agreement;
• annual reports to shareholders and Annual Reports on Form 10-K of AXIS and PartnerRe for the five years ended December 31, 2013;
• certain interim reports to shareholders and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q of AXIS and PartnerRe;
• certain other communications from AXIS and PartnerRe to their respective shareholders;
• certain draft communications from AXIS and PartnerRe before such communications were sent to their respective shareholders;
• certain publicly available research analyst reports for AXIS and PartnerRe;
• certain internal financial analyses and forecasts for PartnerRe prepared by its management;
• certain internal financial analyses and forecasts for AXIS prepared by its management and certain financial analyses and forecasts for PartnerRe prepared by the management of AXIS, in each case, as approved for Goldman Sachs’ use by AXIS (the “Forecasts”); and
• certain operating synergies and dis-synergies projected by the managements of AXIS and PartnerRe to result from the amalgamation, as approved for Goldman Sachs’ use by AXIS (the “Net Synergies”).
Goldman Sachs also held discussions with members of the senior managements of AXIS and PartnerRe regarding their assessment of the strategic rationale for, and the potential benefits of, the amalgamation and the past and current business operations, financial condition and future prospects of PartnerRe and with members of the senior
management of AXIS regarding their assessment of the past and current business operations, financial condition and future prospects of AXIS; reviewed the reported price and trading activity for AXIS common shares and the PartnerRe common shares; compared certain financial and stock market information for AXIS and PartnerRe with similar information for certain other companies the securities of which are publicly traded; reviewed the financial terms of certain recent business combinations in the insurance industry and reinsurance industry and in other industries; and performed such other studies and analyses, and considered such other factors, as it deemed appropriate.
For purposes of rendering the opinion described above, Goldman Sachs, with the consent of AXIS, relied upon and assumed the accuracy and completeness of all of the financial, legal, regulatory, tax, accounting and other information provided to, discussed with or reviewed by Goldman Sachs, without assuming any responsibility for independent verification thereof. In that regard, Goldman Sachs assumed that the Forecasts and the Net Synergies were reasonably prepared on a basis reflecting the best available estimates and judgments of the management of AXIS. Goldman Sachs did not make an independent evaluation or appraisal of the assets and liabilities (including any contingent, derivative or other off-balance-sheet assets and liabilities) of AXIS, PartnerRe, the amalgamated company or any of their respective subsidiaries and Goldman Sachs was not furnished with any such evaluation or appraisal. Goldman Sachs is not an actuary and its services did not include any actuarial determination or evaluation by it or any attempt to evaluate actuarial assumptions and it has relied on AXIS’ actuaries with respect to reserve adequacy. In that regard, Goldman Sachs did not make any analysis of, and did not express any opinion as to, the adequacy of the reserve for losses and loss expenses of AXIS and the unpaid losses and loss expenses and the policy benefits for life and annuity contracts of PartnerRe. Goldman Sachs assumed that all governmental, regulatory or other consents and approvals necessary for the consummation of the amalgamation will be obtained without any adverse effect on AXIS, PartnerRe or the amalgamated company or on the expected benefits of the amalgamation in any way meaningful to its analysis. Goldman Sachs has also assumed that the amalgamation will be consummated on the terms set forth in the amalgamation agreement, without the waiver or modification of any term or condition the effect of which would be in any way meaningful to its analysis.
Goldman Sachs’ opinion does not address the underlying business decision of AXIS to engage in the amalgamation, or the relative merits of the amalgamation as compared to any strategic alternatives that may be available to AXIS; nor does it address any legal, regulatory, tax or accounting matters. Goldman Sachs’ opinion addresses only the fairness from a financial point of view to the holders (other than PartnerRe and its affiliates) of AXIS common shares, as of the date of the opinion, of the AXIS exchange ratio pursuant to the amalgamation agreement. Goldman Sachs’ opinion does not express any view on, and its opinion does not address, any other term or aspect of the amalgamation agreement or amalgamation or any term or aspect of any other agreement or instrument contemplated by the amalgamation agreement or entered into or amended in connection with the amalgamation, including, the fairness of the amalgamation to, or any consideration received in connection therewith by, the holders of any other class of securities, creditors, or other constituencies of AXIS; nor as to the fairness of the amount or nature of any compensation to be paid or payable to any of the officers, directors or employees of AXIS, or class of such persons, in connection with the amalgamation, whether relative to the AXIS exchange ratio pursuant to the amalgamation agreement or otherwise. In addition, Goldman Sachs did not express any opinion as to the impact of the amalgamation on the solvency or viability of AXIS, PartnerRe or the amalgamated company or the ability of AXIS, PartnerRe or the amalgamated company to pay their respective obligations when they come due. Goldman Sachs’ opinion was necessarily based on economic, monetary, market and other conditions as in effect on, and the information made available to it as of, the date of the opinion and Goldman Sachs assumed no responsibility for updating, revising or reaffirming its opinion based on circumstances, developments or events occurring after the date of its opinion. Goldman Sachs’ opinion was approved by a fairness committee of Goldman Sachs.
The following is a summary of the material financial analyses delivered by Goldman Sachs to the AXIS board of directors in connection with rendering the opinion described above. The following summary, however, does not purport to be a complete description of the financial analyses performed by Goldman Sachs, nor does the order of analyses described represent relative importance or weight given to those analyses by Goldman Sachs. Some of the summaries of the financial analyses include information presented in tabular format. The tables must be read together with the full text of each summary and are alone not a complete description of Goldman Sachs’ financial analyses. Except as otherwise noted, the following quantitative information, to the extent that it is based on market data, is based on market data as it existed on or before January 22, 2015 and is not necessarily indicative of current market conditions.
Illustrative Discounted Cash Flow Analysis.
In connection with performing the Illustrative Contribution Analysis described below, Goldman Sachs performed an illustrative discounted cash flow analysis for each of AXIS and PartnerRe using the Forecasts and financial data from Bloomberg. Goldman Sachs calculated an indication of the present value of cash flows for AXIS for the years 2015 through 2018 assuming 100% of estimated net income is returned to shareholders using a discount rate of 5.97%, reflecting an estimate of AXIS’ cost of equity, and applying mid-year discounting. Goldman Sachs then calculated an illustrative terminal value for AXIS by applying a multiple of 1.00x to AXIS’ projected tangible book value as of December 31, 2018 and calculated an indication of the present value of such illustrative terminal value using a discount rate of 5.97%.
In addition, Goldman Sachs calculated an indication of the present value of cash flows of PartnerRe for the years 2015 through 2018 assuming 100% of estimated net income is returned to shareholders using a discount rate of 5.85%, reflecting an estimate of PartnerRe’s cost of equity, and applying mid-year discounting. Goldman Sachs then calculated an illustrative terminal value for PartnerRe by applying a multiple of 1.00x to PartnerRe’s projected tangible book value as of December 31, 2018 and calculated an indication of the present value of such illustrative terminal value using a discount rate of 5.85%.
Illustrative Contribution Analysis.
Goldman Sachs performed illustrative contribution analyses based on historical and other financial information of AXIS and PartnerRe from SEC filings, market data as of January 22, 2015, the Forecasts and the AXIS exchange ratio. The results of the analyses are summarized as follows:
Metric 1 | AXIS | PartnerRe |
Company Exchange Ratio | 48.4% | 51.6% |
Valuation (As of January 22, 2015) | | |
Diluted Market Capitalization 2 | 46.6% | 53.4% |
Income Statement | | |
Operating Income (Last Twelve Months) (Q3 2014) | 46.4% | 53.6% |
Operating Income (2015E)3 | 42.6% | 57.4% |
Balance Sheet | | |
Book Value (12/31/2014 E) (including accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”)) 3 | 46.4% | 53.6% |
Tangible Book Value (12/31/2014 E) (including AOCI) 3 | 48.4% | 51.6% |
Book value (9/30/2014) (including AOCI) | 45.7% | 54.3% |
Tangible Book Value (9/30/2014) (including AOCI) | 48.0% | 52.0% |
Management Estimate-Based Standalone Discounted Cash Flow Valuation (12/31/14 E) 3, 4 | 48.3% | 51.7% |
1 Data per AXIS’ and PartnerRe’s SEC filings and the Forecasts. Market data is as of January 22, 2015. 2 Diluted market capitalization based on AXIS and PartnerRe’s year end 2014 treasury stock method diluted share count multiplied by their respective share prices as of January 22, 2015. 3 Per the Forecasts. 4 See description in “—Illustrative Discounted Cash Flow Analysis” above. |
Illustrative Pro Forma Financial Impact Analysis.
Goldman Sachs performed illustrative pro forma analyses of the potential financial impact of the amalgamation using the Forecasts, the Net Synergies and financial data obtained from Bloomberg and taking into account certain accounting assumptions provided by AXIS’ management prior to the date of the amalgamation agreement. For each of the estimated years 2015 through 2017, Goldman Sachs compared the projected earnings per AXIS common share, on a standalone basis, to the projected earnings per AXIS common share, on a pro forma basis, taking into account Net Synergies. For the estimated year 2016, Goldman Sachs also compared the projected earnings per AXIS common share, on a standalone basis, to the projected earnings per AXIS common share, on a pro forma basis, using fully phased-in Net Synergies numbers.
Goldman Sachs also compared the projected book value per AXIS common share and tangible book value per AXIS common share, respectively, on a standalone basis, to the projected book value per AXIS common share and tangible book value per AXIS common share, respectively, on a pro forma basis, in each case, as of the assumed closing date, December 31, 2015, December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2017. In addition, Goldman Sachs compared the projected return on equity per AXIS common share, on a standalone basis, to the projected return on equity per AXIS common share, on a pro forma basis, for the fiscal years 2015, 2016 and 2017. Goldman Sachs further compared the projected total debt including preferred shares divided by capitalization of AXIS, on a standalone basis, to the projected total debt including preferred shares divided by capitalization of AXIS, on a pro forma basis, as of the assumed closing date. In each of the above scenarios, the market price for AXIS common shares was as of January 22, 2015 and the assumed closing date was September 30, 2015.
The results of the analyses are summarized as follows:
| Accretion / Dilution |
| |
Earnings Per AXIS Share | |
Fiscal Year 2015[E] | (0.6) % |
Fiscal Year 2016[E] | 8.4 |
Fiscal Year 2016[E] 1 | 18.3 |
Fiscal Year 2017[E] | 9.1 |
Book Value Per AXIS Share | |
At Close (September 30, 2015[E]) | 2.0 % |
December 31, 2015[E] | 0.4 |
December 31, 2016[E] | 0.8 |
December 31, 2017[E] | 0.9 |
Tangible Book Value Per AXIS Share | |
At Close (September 30, 2015) | 1.0 % |
December 31, 2015[E] | (0.7) |
December 31, 2016[E] | (0.0) |
December 31, 2017[E] | 0.2 |
1 Using fully phased-in Net Synergies numbers
| Pro Forma |
Return on Equity | |
Fiscal Year 2015 | 8.13% |
Fiscal Year 2016 | 9.33% |
Fiscal Year 2017 | 10.64% |
(Debt + Preferred Shares) / Capitalization | |
At Close | 22.2% |
General.
The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process and is not necessarily susceptible to partial analysis or summary description. Selecting portions of the analyses or of the summary set forth above, without considering the analyses as a whole, could create an incomplete view of the processes underlying Goldman Sachs’ opinion. In arriving at its fairness determination, Goldman Sachs considered the results of all of its analyses and did not attribute any particular weight to any factor or analysis considered by it. Rather, Goldman Sachs made its determination as to fairness on the basis of its experience and professional judgment after considering the results of all of its analyses.
Goldman Sachs prepared these analyses for purposes of Goldman Sachs’ providing its opinion to the AXIS board of directors as to the fairness from a financial point of view, as of January 25, 2015, of the AXIS exchange ratio pursuant to the amalgamation agreement to the holders (other than PartnerRe and its affiliates) of AXIS common shares. These analyses do not purport to be appraisals nor do they necessarily reflect the prices at which businesses or securities actually may be sold. Analyses based upon forecasts of future results are not necessarily indicative of actual future results, which may be significantly more or less favorable than suggested by these analyses. Because these analyses are inherently subject to uncertainty, being based upon numerous factors or events beyond the control of the parties or their respective advisors, none of AXIS, PartnerRe, Goldman Sachs or any other person assumes responsibility if future results are materially different from those forecast.
The AXIS exchange ratio was determined through arm’s-length negotiations between AXIS and PartnerRe and was approved by the AXIS board of directors. Goldman Sachs provided advice to the AXIS board of directors during these negotiations. Goldman Sachs did not, however, recommend any specific exchange ratio to AXIS or the AXIS board of directors or that any specific exchange ratio constituted the only appropriate exchange ratio for the amalgamation.
As described above, Goldman Sachs’ opinion to the AXIS board of directors was one of many factors taken into consideration by the AXIS board of directors in making its determination to approve the amalgamation agreement. The foregoing summary does not purport to be a complete description of the analyses performed by Goldman Sachs in connection with its fairness opinion and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the written opinion of Goldman Sachs attached as Annex C.
Goldman Sachs and its affiliates are engaged in advisory, underwriting and financing, principal investing, sales and trading, research, investment management and other financial and non-financial activities and services for various persons and entities. Goldman Sachs and its affiliates and employees, and funds or other entities they manage or in which they invest or have other economic interests or with which they co-invest, may at any time purchase, sell, hold or vote long or short positions and investments in securities, derivatives, loans, commodities, currencies, credit default swaps and other financial instruments of AXIS, PartnerRe, any of their respective affiliates and third parties, or any currency or commodity that may be involved in the amalgamation. Goldman Sachs acted as financial advisor to AXIS in connection with, and participated in certain of the negotiations leading to, the amalgamation. During the two-year period ending January 25, 2015, Goldman Sachs has not provided financial advisory and/or underwriting services to either AXIS or PartnerRe or either of their respective affiliates for which its Investment Banking Division has received compensation. Goldman Sachs may in the future provide financial advisory and/or underwriting services to AXIS, PartnerRe and the amalgamated company and their respective affiliates for which its Investment Banking Division may receive compensation.
The AXIS board of directors selected Goldman Sachs as its financial advisor because it is an internationally recognized investment banking firm that has substantial experience in transactions similar to the amalgamation. Pursuant to a letter agreement dated January 24, 2015, AXIS engaged Goldman Sachs to act as its financial advisor in connection with the proposed amalgamation. Pursuant to the terms of this engagement letter, AXIS has agreed to pay Goldman Sachs a transaction fee of $19.5 million, all of which is payable upon consummation of the amalgamation. In addition, AXIS has agreed to reimburse Goldman Sachs for its expenses, including attorneys’ fees and disbursements, and to indemnify Goldman Sachs and related persons against various liabilities, including certain liabilities under the federal securities laws.
As of the effective time of the amalgamation, the board of directors of Newco will be composed of seven members of the PartnerRe board of directors and seven members of the AXIS board of directors. The initial directors of Newco will be Jean-Paul L. Montupet (Chairman), Albert A. Benchimol (Chief Executive Officer), Michael A. Butt (Chairman Emeritus), Charles A. Davis, Robert L. Friedman, Christopher V. Greetham, Roberto Mendoza, Debra J. Perry, Thomas C. Ramey, Rémy Sautter, Henry B. Smith, Kevin M. Twomey, Egbert Willam and David Zwiener.
Following the effective time, the senior executive management team of Newco will consist of Albert Benchimol, AXIS’ current President and Chief Executive Officer, who will serve as President and Chief Executive Officer of Newco; Joseph C. Henry, currently Chief Financial Officer of AXIS, who will continue in this role as Chief Financial Officer of Newco; William Babcock, currently Chief Financial Officer of PartnerRe, who will serve
as Deputy Chief Financial Officer and Lead Integration Officer of Newco and will assume the role of Chief Financial Officer of Newco upon the retirement of Mr. Henry in July 2016; Peter Wilson, currently Chief Executive Officer of AXIS Insurance, who will serve as Chief Executive Officer of Insurance of Newco; Chris DiSipio, currently Chief Executive Officer of AXIS Accident and Health, who will serve as Chief Executive Officer of Life, Accident and Health of Newco; Emmanuel Clarke, currently Chief Executive Officer of PartnerRe Global, who will serve as Chief Executive Officer of Reinsurance of Newco; and John (Jay) Nichols, currently Chief Executive Officer of AXIS Re, who will serve as Head of Strategic Business Development and Capital Solutions at Newco.
In considering the recommendation of the PartnerRe board of directors, PartnerRe shareholders should be aware that certain directors and executive officers of PartnerRe (including Costas Miranthis, PartnerRe’s former President and Chief Executive Officer) will have interests in the proposed amalgamation that are different from, or in addition to, the interests of PartnerRe shareholders generally and which may create potential conflicts of interest. These interests are described in more detail below, and, with respect to the named executive officers of PartnerRe, are quantified in the table below. The PartnerRe board of directors was aware of these interests and considered them when it adopted the amalgamation agreement and approved the amalgamation. The date and share price used to quantify certain of the interests below were selected for illustrative purposes only and do not necessarily reflect the date on which certain events will occur or the value of PartnerRe’s common shares at that time.
Conversion of PartnerRe Shares Held by Directors and Executive Officers of PartnerRe Pursuant to the Amalgamation
As a group, the PartnerRe directors and executive officers (including Mr. Miranthis, PartnerRe’s former President and Chief Executive Officer) beneficially owned, as of March 6, 2015, an aggregate of approximately 232,058 PartnerRe common shares. Upon the consummation of the amalgamation, each PartnerRe common share held by the directors and executive officers that is issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the amalgamation will, like all other PartnerRe common shares, be automatically cancelled and converted into a Newco common share, using the exchange ratio, with cash payable in lieu of fractional shares. Dispositions of PartnerRe common shares, if any, prior to the consummation of the amalgamation will change the amount of Newco common shares the directors and executive officers of PartnerRe will receive in respect of their PartnerRe common shares upon the consummation of the amalgamation.
The following table sets forth the total number of PartnerRe common shares beneficially owned by each PartnerRe executive officer and director, as of March 6, 2015.
| | PartnerRe Common Shares Beneficially Owned (#) | |
| | | |
Executive Officers | | | |
William Babcock | | | 9,659 | |
Emmanuel Clarke | | | 23,357 | |
Laurie Desmet | | | 10,517 | |
Theodore C. Walker | | | 8,809 | |
David Zwiener | | | 5,587 | |
Costas Miranthis | | | 126,821 | |
| | | | |
Non-Employee Directors | | | | |
Jean-Paul L. Montupet | | | 10,166 | |
Judith Hanratty | | | 1,039 | |
Jan H. Holsboer | | | 20,086 | |
Roberto Mendoza | | | 2,194 | |
Debra J. Perry | | | - | |
Rémy Sautter | | | 11,149 | |
Greg F.H. Seow | | | - | |
Kevin M. Twomey | | | 2,674 | |
Egbert Willam | | | - | |
Conversion of PartnerRe Options and Share Appreciation Rights
The PartnerRe executive officers held, as of March 6, 2015, options to acquire 41,065 PartnerRe common shares, at a weighted average exercise price of $72.72. The PartnerRe directors held, as of March 6, 2015, options to acquire 214,191 PartnerRe common shares, at a weighted average exercise price of $71.17. The PartnerRe executive officers (including Mr. Miranthis, PartnerRe’s former President and Chief Executive Officer) held, as of March 6, 2015, held share appreciation rights underlying 738,310 PartnerRe common shares, at a weighted average exercise price of $85.31.
At the effective time of the amalgamation, each outstanding PartnerRe share option held by an executive officer will vest and convert into an option to purchase, on the same terms and conditions as such PartnerRe share option, a number of Newco common shares that is equal to the number of PartnerRe common shares subject to such PartnerRe share option multiplied by the exchange ratio, at an exercise price per Newco common share equal to the exercise price per PartnerRe common share subject to such PartnerRe share option divided by the exchange ratio. Each outstanding PartnerRe share appreciation right will vest and convert into a share appreciation right, on the same terms and conditions as such PartnerRe share appreciation right, for a number of Newco common shares equal to the number of PartnerRe common shares subject to such PartnerRe share appreciation right multiplied by the exchange ratio, at an exercise price per Newco common share equal to the exercise price per PartnerRe common share subject to such PartnerRe share appreciation right divided by the exchange ratio.
Any outstanding PartnerRe share option held by a director will remain outstanding in accordance with its terms and convert into a Newco share option in accordance with the conversion mechanism described in the preceding paragraph.
Further information about the treatment of the PartnerRe share options and share appreciation rights is set forth in the section entitled “The Amalgamation Agreement—Treatment of Share Options and Other Share-Based Awards and Programs.”
The following table sets forth the number and weighted average exercise price of the vested and unvested share options and share appreciation rights held by each executive officer and director of PartnerRe, as of March 6, 2015.
| | | | | PartnerRe Share Appreciation Rights | |
| | | | | | | | Weighted Average Exercise Price ($) | | | | | | | | | Weighted Average Exercise Price ($) | |
Executive Officers | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
William Babcock | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 100,317 | | | | 50,543 | | | | 87.19 | |
Emmanuel Clarke | | | 12,000 | | | | - | | | | 75.85 | | | | 94,329 | | | | 35,919 | | | | 84.87 | |
Laurie Desmet | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 65,987 | | | | 32,648 | | | | 85.74 | |
Theodore C. Walker | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 209,460 | | | | 35,919 | | | | 82.63 | |
David Zwiener | | | 25,621 | | | | 3,444 | | | | 71.43 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Costas Miranthis | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 65,874 | | | | 47,314 | | | | 88.79 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Non-Employee Directors | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Jean-Paul L. Montupet | | | 38,627 | | | | 4,305 | | | | 72.82 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Judith Hanratty | | | 6,683 | | | | 3,444 | | | | 71.12 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Jan H. Holsboer | | | 66,062 | | | | 3,444 | | | | 69.52 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Roberto Mendoza | | | 23,170 | | | | 3,444 | | | | 71.05 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Debra J. Perry | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Rémy Sautter | | | 17,451 | | | | 3,444 | | | | 69.82 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Greg F.H. Seow | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Kevin M. Twomey | | | 34,765 | | | | 3,444 | | | | 73.17 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Egbert Willam | | | 3,899 | | | | 2,009 | | | | 71.12 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Conversion of PartnerRe Restricted Share Units and Performance Share Units
The PartnerRe directors and executive officers (including Mr. Miranthis, PartnerRe’s former President and Chief Executive Officer) held, as of March 6, 2015, rights to receive 256,356 PartnerRe common shares in connection with restricted share units and performance share units.
At the effective time of the amalgamation, each outstanding PartnerRe restricted share unit and performance share unit held by an executive officer, will vest and settle (and any such performance share units will vest and settle as if the maximum performance were achieved), and each PartnerRe common share delivered in settlement thereof will be eligible to receive the consideration for a PartnerRe common share described above. Each outstanding PartnerRe other share-based award that is held by a non-employee director, other than restricted share units held by those non-employee directors who will not continue to serve on the Newco board of directors following the amalgamation, will be converted into an award, on the same terms and conditions as such PartnerRe share-based award, with respect to a number of Newco common shares equal to the number of PartnerRe common shares underlying such PartnerRe share-based award multiplied by the exchange ratio. Further information about the treatment of the PartnerRe other share-based awards is set forth in the section entitled “The Amalgamation Agreement—Treatment of Share Options and Other Share-Based Awards and Programs.”
Individuals who currently serve as non-employee directors of PartnerRe but who will not serve on the Newco board following the amalgamation will experience a termination due to mandatory retirement on the closing date of the amalgamation. Under the terms of the restricted share unit awards held by such directors, any such awards granted prior to the calendar year in which the closing of the amalgamation occurs will vest fully on the date on which the directors’ service with the PartnerRe board of directors terminates, which will be the closing date of the amalgamation. Any awards granted to such directors during the calendar year in which the closing of the amalgamation occurs will vest on a pro rata basis, based on the number of full months during which the director served on the PartnerRe board of directors during the calendar year of grant, and the remaining portion of the award will be forfeited on the closing date of the amalgamation.
The following table sets forth the total number of outstanding PartnerRe restricted share units and performance share units held by each executive officer and director of PartnerRe, as of March 6, 2015.
| | PartnerRe Restricted Share Units (#) | | | PartnerRe Performance Share Units (#) | |
| | | | | | |
Executive Officers | | | | | | |
William Babcock | | | 13,828 | | | | 15,218 | |
Emmanuel Clarke | | | 15,797 | | | | 15,797 | |
Laurie Desmet | | | 16,275 | | | | 12,154 | |
Theodore C. Walker | | | 15,797 | | | | 15,797 | |
David Zwiener | | | 19,874 | | | | - | |
Costas Miranthis | | | 26,803 | | | | 26,803 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Non-Employee Directors | | | | | | | | |
Jean-Paul L. Montupet | | | 9,093 | | | | - | |
Judith Hanratty | | | 7,206 | | | | - | |
Jan H. Holsboer | | | 11,344 | | | | - | |
Roberto Mendoza | | | 8,072 | | | | - | |
Debra J. Perry | | | 3,054 | | | | - | |
Rémy Sautter | | | 8,368 | | | | - | |
Greg F.H. Seow | | | 3,054 | | | | - | |
Kevin M. Twomey | | | 6,887 | | | | - | |
Egbert Willam | | | 5,135 | | | | - | |
PartnerRe Change in Control Policy
PartnerRe sponsors a Change in Control Policy (the “CIC Policy”), which would provide payments and benefits to certain employees in the event of a qualifying termination following the amalgamation. Each of PartnerRe’s executive officers (other than Messrs. Zwiener and Miranthis) is eligible for payments and benefits under the CIC
Policy if, within 12 months of the amalgamation, Newco delivers to the executive notice of its intent to terminate such executive’s employment without cause (as defined in the CIC Policy) or, within six months of the amalgamation, such executive delivers to Newco notice of his or her intent to terminate for good reason (as defined in the CIC Policy), provided, in either case, that such termination occurs within 12 months following such delivery of notice. In the event of such a termination of employment, each executive would be entitled to the following payments and benefits:
| · | Two times the executive’s base salary; |
| · | An amount equal to the greater of the target annual cash incentive for the current year or an amount that is equal to the percentage calculated by multiplying the sum of the percentage that is the payout as percentage of target, as determined by the PartnerRe Compensation & Management Development Committee, for each of the three fiscal years prior to the fiscal year in which the notice of termination occurs, divided by three, and multiplying the resulting percentage by the target annual cash incentive value (the “Average Incentive”), prorated for the number of days elapsed in the fiscal year of termination prior to the executive’s termination date; |
| · | An amount equal to two times the Average Incentive; |
| · | For Mr. Clarke, housing and school allowance for up to 12 months; |
| · | Health and welfare benefit continuation for two years; and |
| · | Immediate vesting of all equity awards. |
In addition to the payments and benefits that the executives are eligible to receive under the CIC Policy, under each executive’s employment agreement (other than Messrs. Zwiener and Miranthis), such executive is entitled to 12 months’ notice prior to a termination without cause, during which time the executive is entitled to continued compensation and benefits. If the executive is terminated prior to the end of the notice period, such executive is entitled to a lump-sum payment in lieu of the payments and benefits that such executive would have received during the notice period. Such amounts would be paid in addition to the payments and benefits under the CIC Policy, as described above.
The payments described above are contingent upon each executive’s execution and non-revocation of a general release of claims against PartnerRe. Messrs. Babcock, Clarke and Walker and Ms. Desmet are each subject to a one-year post-termination non-solicitation covenant and a confidentiality covenant. The restrictive covenants applicable to Messrs. Zwiener and Miranthis are described below in the sections entitled “—Zwiener Agreement” and “—Miranthis Agreement.”
Zwiener Agreement
On January 25, 2015, PartnerRe entered into an employment agreement with David Zwiener, pursuant to which he will serve as PartnerRe’s interim President and Chief Executive Officer for the period beginning on January 25, 2015 and ending on the earlier of the closing date of the amalgamation and April 30, 2016 (such date, in either case, the “separation date”). Mr. Zwiener’s annual base salary during his employment term is $1,000,000. Mr. Zwiener received a grant of sign-on restricted share units with a value of $1,500,000, which will vest and settle on the separation date. Subject to the closing of the amalgamation, Mr. Zwiener is eligible to receive a cash service bonus of $3,500,000, payable on the closing date of the amalgamation, and he is also eligible to receive a discretionary cash bonus based on the PartnerRe board of directors’ assessment of Mr. Zwiener’s execution of the amalgamation or his efforts in relation thereto.
If Mr. Zwiener’s employment is terminated by Newco without cause or for good reason, he will be entitled to an amount equal to the base salary that would otherwise have been paid to him for the period between his date of termination and April 30, 2016, a cash payment equal to the value of his sign-on restricted share unit award and payment of the cash service bonus, provided that the closing date of the amalgamation occurs on or prior to April 30, 2016.
Under his employment agreement, Mr. Zwiener will be subject to a one-year post-termination non-solicitation covenant, a confidentiality covenant and a non-disparagement covenant.
Miranthis Agreement
On January 25, 2015, PartnerRe entered into a separation agreement with Costas Miranthis, pursuant to which he resigned from his position as President and Chief Executive Officer and will continue to serve as a non-executive employee of PartnerRe until March 31, 2015, at which time his employment with PartnerRe will terminate. Pursuant to the separation agreement, Mr. Miranthis is entitled to specified payments and benefits following his resignation.
Under the separation agreement, Mr. Miranthis received a cash payment totaling $16,594,007, two-thirds of which was paid on February 3, 2015, and one-third of which will be paid following the earlier of the closing date of the amalgamation or December 1, 2015. This amount includes, in addition to his cash severance amounts, a cash payment equal to the value of the equity award that Mr. Miranthis earned and would have received in 2015 with respect to 2014 performance. The unvested equity awards that Mr. Miranthis holds as of March 31, 2015 will become fully vested as of such date (with any performance-vesting restricted share units being earned at the maximum level of performance achievement), and any share options and share appreciation rights will remain exercisable for their original maximum terms. Mr. Miranthis will also be entitled to certain other payments and benefits, including a supplemental contribution of $150,000 to the Bermuda Non-Registered Pension Plan, continued allowances for housing, tax advice fees and a club membership, and payment of reasonable attorneys’ fees incurred by him in connection with the negotiation and execution of the separation agreement.
The separation agreement provides that Mr. Miranthis is subject to a non-competition covenant for the period between the date of the signing of the amalgamation and the payment date of the second payment described above, a one-year non-solicitation covenant, a confidentiality covenant and a non-disparagement covenant.
No Golden Parachute Excise Tax Gross-Up
In connection with the amalgamation, no executive officer or director will be entitled to a gross-up payment related to excise taxes imposed on any executive officer or director in the event that any payments or benefits result in an “excess parachute payment” within the meaning of Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
Special PartnerRe Transaction Committee Compensation
Two members of the PartnerRe Transaction Committee of the PartnerRe board of directors, John-Paul Montupet and Roberto Mendoza, received additional compensation in recognition of their efforts in exploring and pursuing a strategic transaction for the Company, including the proposed amalgamation. On the date of the signing of the amalgamation agreement, Messrs. Montupet and Mendoza each received a one-time cash payment of $100,000 and a grant of a restricted share unit award with a value of $100,000. The restricted share unit award will vest and settle in full on the earliest of the date of the closing of the amalgamation, the date on which the amalgamation agreement is terminated or December 31, 2016.
Indemnification and Insurance
Pursuant to the terms of the amalgamation agreement, PartnerRe’s directors and executive officers will be entitled to certain ongoing indemnification and coverage under the directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policies from Newco. See the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus titled “The Amalgamation Agreement—Directors’ and Officers’ Indemnification and Insurance.”
Quantification of Payments and Benefits to PartnerRe’s Named Executive Officers
The following table and the related footnotes present information about the compensation payable to PartnerRe’s named executive officers in connection with the proposed amalgamation. The compensation shown in this table is subject to a vote, on a nonbinding advisory basis, of the PartnerRe shareholders at the PartnerRe special general meeting, as described in the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus titled “Proposals to be
Submitted to PartnerRe Shareholders; Voting Requirements and Recommendations—Proposal 2. Approval of the Compensation Advisory Proposal.”
Golden Parachute Compensation – PartnerRe
The following table sets forth the information required by Item 402(t) of Regulation S-K regarding the compensation for PartnerRe’s named executive officers (who include Mr. Miranthis, PartnerRe’s former President and Chief Executive Officer) based on the amalgamation, assuming that the amalgamation was completed on March 6, 2015 and the named executive officers are terminated without cause on the day immediately following the consummation of the amalgamation. The actual amounts payable would depend on the date of termination, the manner of the termination and the terms of the agreements in effect at such time. More detail on the included payments and benefits are set forth above in the section entitled “—Interests of PartnerRe’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Amalgamation.”
| | | | | | | | Perquisites/ Benefits ($)(3) | | | | |
William Babcock | | | 3,486,495 | | | | 4,699,697 | | | | 53,077 | | | | 8,239,269 | |
Emmanuel Clarke | | | 3,879,535 | | | | 4,921,058 | | | | 170,204 | | | | 8,970,797 | |
Laurie Desmet | | | 3,368,525 | | | | 4,309,633 | | | | 41,400 | | | | 7,719,558 | |
Theodore C. Walker | | | 3,149,217 | | | | 4,921,058 | | | | 62,371 | | | | 8,132,646 | |
Costas Miranthis(4) | | | 11,453,699 | | | | 8,617,815 | | | | 395,025 | | | | 20,466,539 | |
| (1) | This amount includes the total cash severance payments that would be payable to each named executive officer under the CIC Policy and his or her employment agreement in the event of a termination without cause within 12 months following the consummation of the amalgamation, as applicable. |
| (2) | This amount includes the value of unvested share appreciation rights, restricted share units and performance share units, the vesting of which would be accelerated immediately upon the consummation of the amalgamation (based on a value per share of $114.95, which is the average closing price of PartnerRe’s common shares over the first five business days following the first public announcement of the transaction (i.e., the five-day period beginning January 26, 2015)). |
The following table lists the portion of the value set forth in the “Equity” column in the table above attributable to each type of accelerated equity held by PartnerRe’s named executive officers:
| | Value of PartnerRe Share Appreciation Rights ($) | | | Value of PartnerRe Restricted Share Units ($) | | | Value of PartnerRe Performance Share Units ($) | |
William Babcock | | | 486,204 | | | | 1,589,529 | | | | 2,623,964 | |
Emmanuel Clarke | | | 381,395 | | | | 1,815,865 | | | | 2,723,798 | |
Laurie Desmet | | | 343,169 | | | | 1,870,811 | | | | 2,095,653 | |
Theodore C. Walker | | | 381,395 | | | | 1,815,865 | | | | 2,723,798 | |
Costas Miranthis | | | 915,303 | | | | 3,081,005 | | | | 4,621,507 | |
| (3) | This amount includes certain other amounts to which the named executive officers may be entitled following their termination pursuant to the CIC Policy and the executive employment agreements, including health and welfare benefit continuation and, in some cases, continued housing and/or school allowances. |
| (4) | Mr. Miranthis resigned as President and Chief Executive Officer on January 25, 2015, and his employment with PartnerRe will terminate on March 31, 2015. The payments that Mr. Miranthis actually received or will receive in connection with his departure are described above under “—Interests of PartnerRe’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Amalgamation—Miranthis Agreement.” |
In considering the recommendation of the AXIS board of directors, AXIS shareholders should be aware that certain directors and executive officers of AXIS will have interests in the proposed amalgamation that are different from, or in addition to, the interests of AXIS shareholders generally and which may create potential conflicts of interest. These interests are described in more detail below, and with respect to the named executive officers of AXIS, are quantified in the table below. The AXIS board of directors was aware of these interests and considered
them when it adopted the amalgamation agreement and approved the amalgamation. The date and share price used to quantify certain of the interests below were selected for illustrative purposes only and do not necessarily reflect the date on which certain events will occur or the value of AXIS’ common shares at that time.
Conversion of AXIS Shares Held by Directors and Executive Officers of AXIS Pursuant to the Amalgamation
As a group, the AXIS directors and executive officers beneficially owned, as of March 6, 2015, an aggregate of approximately 2,179,212 AXIS common shares. Upon the consummation of the amalgamation, the directors and executive officers would receive, as would all other AXIS shareholders, one Newco common share for each such AXIS common share. Dispositions of AXIS common shares, if any, prior to the consummation of the amalgamation will change the amount of Newco common shares the directors and executive officers of AXIS will receive in respect of their AXIS common shares upon the consummation of the amalgamation.
The following table sets forth the total number of AXIS common shares beneficially owned by each AXIS executive officer and director, as of March 6, 2015. Unless otherwise indicated, beneficial ownership represents both sole voting and sole investment power.
| | AXIS Common Shares Beneficially Owned (#) | |
| | | |
Executive Officers | | | |
Albert A. Benchimol | | | 508,237 | |
Christopher N. DiSipio | | | 56,913 | |
Joseph C. Henry | | | 23,759 | |
John D. Nichols | | | 84,325 | |
Peter W. Wilson | | | 2,869 | |
| | | | |
Non-Employee Directors | | | | |
Geoffrey Bell | | | 13,454 | |
Jane Boisseau | | | 6,971 | |
Michael A. Butt | | | 1,215,956 | |
Charles A. Davis | | | — | |
Robert L. Friedman | | | 47,183 | |
Christopher V. Greetham | | | 24,949 | |
Maurice A. Keane | | | 95,880 | |
Sir Andrew Large | | | 9,711 | |
Cheryl-Ann Lister | | | 23,716 | |
Thomas C. Ramey | | | 12,276 | |
Henry B. Smith | | | 38,309 | |
Alice Young | | | 2,177 | |
Wilhelm Zeller | | | 12,527 | |
Conversion of Unvested AXIS Restricted Shares
The AXIS executive officers held, as of March 6, 2015, time-vesting restricted shares as set forth in the table below. Each restricted share will be converted into a restricted share of Newco and shall otherwise have the same other terms and conditions (including vesting) applicable to the AXIS restricted shares prior to the amalgamation. Although the vesting of the AXIS restricted shares will not accelerate upon the consummation of the amalgamation, the terms and conditions of the restricted shares provide that, if an executive officer’s employment is terminated by Newco without cause, or by the executive officer for good reason, in each case during the 24-month period following the consummation of the amalgamation, such AXIS restricted shares, as converted into Newco restricted shares, will become fully vested and nonforfeitable.
Further information about the treatment of AXIS restricted shares is set forth in the section entitled “The Amalgamation Agreement—Treatment of Share Options and Other Share-Based Awards and Programs.”
| | Time-Vesting AXIS Restricted Shares (#) | |
Albert A. Benchimol | | | 96,459 | |
Christopher N. DiSipio | | | 5,175 | |
Joseph C. Henry | | | 7,500 | |
John D. Nichols | | | 25,000 | |
Peter W. Wilson | | | — | |
Conversion of Unvested AXIS Restricted Stock Units
The AXIS executive officers held, as of March 6, 2015, time-vesting AXIS restricted stock units and performance-vesting AXIS restricted stock units as set forth in the table below. Each restricted stock unit will be converted into a restricted stock unit settled in one Newco common share and shall otherwise have the same other terms and conditions (including vesting) as applied to the AXIS restricted stock unit prior to the amalgamation, except that prior to the consummation of the amalgamation, the AXIS board of directors will equitably adjust the performance criteria applicable to the performance-vesting AXIS restricted stock units in order to reflect the amalgamation and to prevent any dilution or enlargement of vesting opportunity. Although the vesting and the settlement of the AXIS restricted stock units will not accelerate upon the consummation of the amalgamation, the terms and conditions of the restricted stock units provide that, if an executive officer’s employment is terminated by Newco without cause, or by the executive officer for good reason, in each case during the 24-month period following the consummation of the amalgamation, such AXIS restricted stock units, as converted into Newco awards, will become fully vested, with performance-vesting AXIS restricted stock units deemed vested at “target” levels. Further information about the treatment of AXIS restricted stock units is set forth in the section entitled “The Amalgamation Agreement—Treatment of Share Options and Other Share-Based Awards and Programs.”
Notwithstanding the foregoing, certain AXIS restricted stock units granted in February 2014 to certain AXIS employees holding the title of “assistant vice president” or above will become fully vested as of the effective time.
| | Time-Vesting AXIS Restricted Stock Units (#) | | | Performance-Vesting AXIS Restricted Stock Units (#) | |
Albert A. Benchimol | | | — | | | | 250,000 | |
Christopher N. DiSipio | | | 24,904 | | | | 15,136 | |
Joseph C. Henry | | | 35,675 | | | | 25,227 | |
John D. Nichols | | | 44,121 | | | | 29,432 | |
Peter W. Wilson | | | 48,263 | | | | 8,770 | |
It should be noted that Mr. Benchimol also holds share appreciation rights underlying 251,196 PartnerRe common shares that he received in connection with his service at PartnerRe during the period from April 2000 through September 2010.
Employment Agreements
AXIS is party to employment agreements with each of its executive officers, which provides for enhanced severance benefits upon a termination without “cause” by AXIS or its successor, or a resignation with “good reason” by the executive officer (each as defined in the applicable employment agreement), if such termination occurs during the 24-month period following the consummation of the amalgamation.
In the event of a termination without “cause” by AXIS or its successor, or a resignation with “good reason” by the executive officer during the 24-month period following the consummation of the amalgamation, the executive officer would be entitled to the following payments and benefits:
| · | a lump sum amount equal to one year’s base salary, except for Mr. Benchimol who will be entitled to a lump sum amount equal to two years’ base salary; |
| · | an amount equal to two times the annual bonus that the executive officer would have been entitled to receive for the calendar year in which the termination occurs, except for Mr. Benchimol who will be entitled to an amount equal to three times the higher of (a) the highest annual bonus earned for any of the three calendar years preceding the date of termination, or (b) the annual bonus that he would have been entitled to receive for the calendar year in which the termination occurs; |
| · | a pro-rata portion of the annual bonus that the executive officer would have been entitled to receive for the calendar year in which the termination occurs; |
| · | continued payment by AXIS of medical coverage or COBRA premiums for a 12-month period, or less in the event that the executive officer ceases to be eligible for COBRA continuation coverage; and |
| · | all outstanding and unvested restricted shares of AXIS’ common shares, time-vesting restricted stock units and performance-vesting restricted stock units held by the executive officer on the date of termination would immediately vest. |
Under the employment agreements, the executive officer would be required to execute a general release and waiver of claims against AXIS and to resign from his position upon termination of employment for any reason. The executive officers are subject to non-competition and non-solicitation restrictions (of AXIS employees and customers) for a period of 12 months after termination, except for Mr. Benchimol who is subject to non-competition and non-solicitation restrictions (of AXIS employees and customers) for a period of 24 months after termination of employment, and Mr. DiSipio, who is subject to non-competition restrictions for a period of 6 months after termination of employment, and non-solicitation restrictions (of AXIS employees and customers) for a period of 12 months after termination of employment. Additionally, the executive officers are subject to ongoing confidentiality requirements.
On March 9, 2015, AXIS and Mr. Benchimol entered into Amendment No. 1 to his employment agreement dated May 3, 2012. The Amendment extended the term of Mr. Benchimol’s employment as AXIS Chief Executive Officer from May 3, 2015 to the earlier of: (i) the consummation of the amalgamation, or (ii) the end date (as described under “The Amalgamation Agreement - Termination of the Amalgamation Agreement”). The only changes to Mr. Benchimol’s employment agreement relate to the extension of the terms of his employment agreement and all other terms remained unchanged. Prior to the consummation of the amalgamation, AXIS, with PartnerRe’s consent, anticipates entering into a mutually acceptable employment agreement with Mr. Benchimol to reflect his new role with Newco, including that pursuant to the amalgamation agreement, Mr. Benchimol will be appointed to the Newco board of directors and serve as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Newco.
No Golden Parachute Excise Tax Gross-Up
In connection with the amalgamation, no executive officer or director will be entitled to a gross-up payment related to excise taxes imposed on any executive officer or director in the event that any payments or benefits result in an “excess parachute payment” within the meaning of Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
Vesting of Certain Balances under Supplemental Retirement Plan
Certain of AXIS’ executive officers have unvested discretionary employer contributions under the AXIS Specialty U.S. Services, Inc. Supplemental Retirement Plan. These unvested contributions will become fully vested effective as of the consummation of the amalgamation. The executive officers, and their unvested discretionary employer contributions as of March 6, 2015, are set forth below.
| | Unvested Supplemental Retirement Plan Balance ($) |
Peter W. Wilson | | 4,237 |
Indemnification and Insurance
Pursuant to the terms of the amalgamation agreement, AXIS’ directors and executive officers will be entitled to certain ongoing indemnification and coverage under the directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policies from Newco. See the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus titled “The Amalgamation Agreement — Directors’ and Officers’ Indemnification and Insurance.”
Certain Governance Provisions
The amalgamation agreement contains provisions related to the initial composition of the Newco board of directors and procedural protections related to the removal of Mr. Benchimol as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Newco. The bye-laws will require that certain or AXIS directors to be appointed to the Newco board of directors and to committees of the Newco board of directors. In addition, Mr. Benchimol will serve as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Newco, and during the first three years following the consummation of the amalgamation, may only be removed by a resolution of the Newco board of directors including the affirmative vote of 75% of the directors then in office excluding the vote of any director who is an officer (other than the office of director of Newco) or employee of Newco or who is directly or indirectly interested in such resolution. See the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus titled “The Amalgamation Agreement — Governance Matters After the Amalgamation.”
Quantification of Payments and Benefits to AXIS’ Named Executive Officers
The following table and the related footnotes present information about the compensation payable to AXIS’ named executive officers in connection with the proposed amalgamation. The compensation shown in this table is subject to a vote, on a nonbinding advisory basis, of the AXIS shareholders at the AXIS special general meeting, as described in the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus titled “Proposals to be Submitted to AXIS Shareholders; Voting Requirements and Recommendations—Proposal 3. Approval of the Compensation Advisory Proposal.”
Golden Parachute Compensation — AXIS
The following table sets forth the information required by Item 402(t) of Regulation S-K regarding the compensation for AXIS’ named executive officers based on the amalgamation, assuming that the amalgamation was completed on March 6, 2015 and the named executive officers are terminated without cause on the day immediately following the consummation of the amalgamation. The actual amounts payable would depend on the date of termination, the manner of the termination and the terms of the agreements in effect at such time. More detail on the included payments and benefits are set forth above in the section entitled “— Interests of AXIS’ Directors and Executive Officers in the Amalgamation.”
| | | | | Value of Continued Medical Coverage ($)(2) | | | | | | Supplemental Retirement Plan ($)(4) | | | | |
Albert A. Benchimol | | | 9,472,808 | | | | 21,003 | | | | 17,903,615 | | | | — | | | | 27,397,426 | |
Christopher N. DiSipio | | | 1,371,233 | | | | 14,557 | | | | 2,336,530 | | | | — | | | | 3,722,320 | |
Joseph C. Henry | | | 1,795,616 | | | | 14,578 | | | | 3,534,741 | | | | — | | | | 5,344,935 | |
John D. Nichols | | | 3,350,342 | | | | 21,003 | | | | 5,092,825 | | | | — | | | | 8,464,170 | |
Peter W. Wilson | | | 2,978,082 | | | | 14,578 | | | | 2,947,238 | | | | 4,237 | | | | 5,944,135 | |
| (1) | This amount includes the total cash severance payments that would be payable under the named executive officer’s employment agreement as currently in effect in the event of a qualifying termination of his employment, including the amount of enhanced severance the executive officer is entitled to receive in the event of a qualifying termination during the 24-month period following the consummation of the amalgamation. |
| (2) | Although the executive’s officer’s employment agreements provide for post-termination medical coverage in the event of a qualifying termination of employment, the named executive officer is entitled to this benefit without regard to the amalgamation. |
| (3) | This amount includes the value of unvested restricted share units and unvested restricted shares, the vesting of which would be accelerated upon a qualifying termination immediately following the consummation of the amalgamation (based on a value per share of $51.676, which is the average closing price of AXIS’ common shares over the first five business days following the first public announcement of the transaction (i.e., the five-day period beginning January 26, 2015)). The following table lists the portion of the value set forth in the “Equity” column in the table above attributable to each type of accelerated equity held by AXIS’ named executive officers: |
| | Value of Time-Vesting AXIS Restricted Shares ($) | | | Value of Time-Vesting AXIS Restricted Stock Units ($) | | | Value of Performance-Vesting AXIS Restricted Stock Units ($) | |
Albert A. Benchimol | | | 4,984,615 | | | | — | | | | 12,919,000 | |
Christopher N. DiSipio | | | 267,423 | | | | 1,286,939 | | | | 782,168 | |
Joseph C. Henry | | | 387,570 | | | | 1,843,541 | | | | 1,303,630 | |
John D. Nichols | | | 1,291,900 | | | | 2,279,997 | | | | 1,520,928 | |
Peter W. Wilson | | | — | | | | 2,494,039 | | | | 453,199 | |
| (4) | This amount includes the amount of unvested discretionary employer contributions under the AXIS Specialty U.S. Services, Inc. Supplemental Retirement Plan, which would become vested upon the consummation of the amalgamation, without regard to whether the named executive officer’s employment was subsequently terminated. |
Each of PartnerRe and AXIS customarily pays a quarterly cash dividend on their respective common shares. Under the terms of the amalgamation agreement, prior to the effective time of the amalgamation, PartnerRe and AXIS are each permitted to declare and pay ordinary course quarterly cash dividends on their respective common shares with record and payment dates consistent with recent past practice. However, during this period, PartnerRe is permitted to increase its quarterly cash dividends to an amount not to exceed $0.70 per share per quarter, while AXIS may continue to pay, but not increase its current quarterly cash dividend of $0.29. During the fiscal quarter in which the closing of the amalgamation occurs, PartnerRe and AXIS may pay a pro rata dividend for the period from the first day of such quarter until the day immediately preceding the closing date of the amalgamation.
The insurance laws and regulations of all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia, generally require that prior to the acquisition of control of an insurance company, either through the acquisition of or amalgamation with the insurance company or a holding company of that insurance company, the acquiring party must obtain approval from the insurance regulator of the insurance company’s state of domicile. In addition, under the laws of certain states, an acquirer must obtain the approval of the state’s insurance regulator to acquire control of an insurance company that is commercially domiciled in that state.
Applications or notifications in connection with the amalgamation or the changes in control of various insurance subsidiaries of PartnerRe and AXIS that may be deemed to occur as a result of the amalgamation will be filed, pursuant to the amalgamation agreement, with various U.S. state insurance regulatory authorities, including but not limited to the California Insurance Department, the Connecticut Insurance Department, the Delaware Insurance Department, the Illinois Department of Insurance, the New York Department of Financial Services, and the Ohio Department of Insurance.
Applications for approval or notifications to regulators have been filed or will also be filed in certain non-U.S. jurisdictions, including but not limited to Australia, Bermuda, Canada, Hong Kong, Ireland, Singapore and the United Kingdom.
There shall be no right of appeal from an appraisal by the Bermuda Court. The costs of any application to the Bermuda Court to appraise the fair value of the PartnerRe shares or AXIS shares shall be at the discretion of the Bermuda Court.
The following section contains summaries of selected material provisions of the amalgamation agreement. These summaries are qualified in their entirety by reference to the amalgamation agreement, a conformed copy of which, including the amendments thereto, is incorporated by reference in its entirety and included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus as Annex A. You should read the amalgamation agreement in its entirety because it, and not this joint proxy statement/prospectus, is the legal document that governs the amalgamation.
The amalgamation agreement has been included to provide shareholders of PartnerRe and AXIS and other investors with information regarding its terms. It is not intended to provide any other factual information about Newco, PartnerRe and AXIS or any of their respective subsidiaries or affiliates. The representations, warranties and covenants contained in the amalgamation agreement were made by PartnerRe and AXIS only for purposes of the amalgamation agreement and as of specific dates; were solely for the benefit of PartnerRe and AXIS; may be subject to limitations agreed upon by PartnerRe and AXIS, including being qualified by confidential disclosures made for the purposes of allocating risk among PartnerRe and AXIS instead of establishing these matters as facts (such disclosures include information that has been included in PartnerRe’s and AXIS’ public disclosures, as well as additional non-public information); and may be subject to standards of materiality applicable to PartnerRe and AXIS that differ from those applicable to shareholders and other investors. Shareholders and other investors are not third-party beneficiaries under the amalgamation agreement (except for the right to receive consideration from and after the consummation of the amalgamation and, solely with respect to those shareholders who are current or former directors or officers of PartnerRe or AXIS or their respective subsidiaries, the right to indemnification) and should not rely on the representations, warranties and covenants or any descriptions thereof as characterizations of the actual state of facts or condition of PartnerRe and AXIS or any of their respective subsidiaries or affiliates. Additionally, the representations, warranties, covenants, conditions and other terms of the amalgamation agreement may be subject to subsequent waiver or modification. Moreover, information concerning the subject matter of the representations, warranties and covenants may change after the date of the amalgamation agreement, which subsequent information may or may not be fully reflected in PartnerRe’s or AXIS’ public disclosures or this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Amalgamation
Pursuant to the amalgamation agreement and the statutory amalgamation agreement, PartnerRe and AXIS will amalgamate and Newco will continue as a Bermuda exempted company. At the effective time, the amalgamated company will continue with all the rights, properties, liabilities and obligations of PartnerRe and AXIS.
Company Name
The name of the amalgamated company will be Newco.
Board and Management
The initial directors of Newco will be Jean-Paul L. Montupet (Chairman), Albert A. Benchimol (Chief Executive Officer), Michael A. Butt (Chairman Emeritus), Charles A. Davis, Robert L. Friedman, Christopher V. Greetham, Roberto Mendoza, Debra J. Perry, Thomas C. Ramey, Rémy Sautter, Henry B. Smith, Kevin M. Twomey, Egbert Willam and David Zwiener.
The initial officers of Newco will include Albert Benchimol (Chief Executive Officer), Joseph C. Henry (Chief Financial Officer), William Babcock (Deputy Chief Financial Officer and Lead Integration Officer), Emmanuel Clarke (Chief Executive Officer of Reinsurance), Peter Wilson (Chief Executive Officer of Insurance), Chris DiSipio (Chief Executive Officer of Life, Accident and Health) and John (Jay) Nichols (Executive Vice President for Strategic Business Development and Capital Solutions).
The closing is expected to occur on the third business day after the date of the satisfaction or waiver of all closing conditions, which are summarized below in “—Conditions to Consummation of the Amalgamation,” unless otherwise agreed in writing by the parties.
The amalgamation will become effective at the effective time, which will occur upon the issuance of the certificate of amalgamation by the Registrar of Companies in Bermuda or such other time as the certificate of amalgamation may provide.
At the effective time each PartnerRe common share issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time shall automatically be cancelled and converted into the right to receive 2.18 Newco common shares.
At the effective time each AXIS common share issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time shall automatically be cancelled and converted into the right to receive one Newco common share.
A holder of PartnerRe common shares, who otherwise would have received a fractional Newco common share, will be entitled to receive from the exchange agent, appointed by PartnerRe and AXIS pursuant to the amalgamation agreement, a cash payment in lieu of such fractional shares representing such holder’s proportionate interest in the proceeds from the sale by the exchange agent of all the excess Newco common shares represented by the aggregate amount of fractional shares of PartnerRe common shares.
Without prejudice to the appraisal rights described below in (“—Dissenting Shares”), at the effective time each PartnerRe preferred share and each AXIS preferred share issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time will continue as a preferred share of Newco and will be entitled to the same dividend and other relative rights, preferences, limitations and restrictions as are now provided by the respective certificate of designation, preferences and rights of such PartnerRe preferred shares or AXIS preferred shares, respectively.
Exchange Agent
At least five business days prior to the effective time, AXIS and PartnerRe will jointly designate an exchange agent for the purpose of exchanging shares of AXIS and PartnerRe for the amalgamation consideration. Newco will deposit with the exchange agent as soon as reasonably practicable following the effective time certificates or shares in book-entry form representing the Newco common shares to be exchanged in the amalgamation. Following the effective time, Newco will also promptly deposit cash in an amount sufficient to pay any dividends or distributions on Newco common shares with a record date on or following the effective time in respect of Newco common shares to be issued to former AXIS and PartnerRe shareholders who have not yet exchanged their respective AXIS and PartnerRe common shares for their respective consideration.
Exchange Process
As promptly as practical, but in no event later than five business days following the effective time, Newco shall cause the exchange agent to mail a letter of transmittal in customary form acceptable to both PartnerRe and AXIS to each holder of record of AXIS and PartnerRe common shares converted into the right to receive their respective amalgamation consideration. Upon surrender of certificates, which immediately prior to the effective time represented the respective holder’s AXIS or PartnerRe common shares, or in the case of AXIS or PartnerRe common shares held in book-entry form, pursuant to customary provisions with respect to delivery of an “agent’s” message in accordance with the instructions set forth in the letter of transmittal, together with the duly executed letter of transmittal and any other documents reasonably required by the exchange agent, each such holder of AXIS or PartnerRe common shares shall be entitled to receive their respective amalgamation consideration payable in respect of their common shares. Any certificates so surrendered shall be cancelled immediately. No interest shall accrue or be paid on any amount payable upon surrender of certificates or otherwise.
Unregistered Transferees
If any amalgamation consideration is to be paid to a person or entity other than the person or entity in whose name the surrendered AXIS or PartnerRe certificate (as the case may be) is registered, it will be a condition to the payment of such respective amalgamation consideration to such transferee that the surrendered certificate be accompanied by all documents required to evidence and effect the transfer that are reasonably satisfactory to Newco and that the person or entity requesting such payment of their respective amalgamation consideration pays the applicable transfer taxes or establishes to the satisfaction of Newco and the exchange agent that any applicable transfer taxes have already been paid or are not applicable.
No Other Rights
Until surrendered with the procedures described above, each AXIS or PartnerRe common share shall be deemed, from and after the effective time, to represent only the right to receive the applicable amalgamation consideration and, in the case of dissenting shares, the additional right to receive consideration as described below in “—Dissenting Shares.”
Duration of Exchange Fund
Any portion of the exchange fund held by the exchange agent that has not been distributed to holders of AXIS or PartnerRe common shares within 180 days following the effective time will be delivered to Newco, upon demand, and after such transfer, any holders of AXIS or PartnerRe common shares (as the case may be) may look only to Newco for payment of their respective amalgamation consideration.
Withholding
The exchange agent, Newco, AXIS or PartnerRe, as applicable, will be entitled to deduct and withhold from the amalgamation consideration those amounts as it is required to deduct and withhold with respect to the making of payment under any provision of applicable tax or other law. Amounts so withheld will be treated for all purposes of the amalgamation agreement as having been paid to the AXIS or PartnerRe shareholder in respect of whom the deduction and withholding was made.
At the effective time: (i) each outstanding PartnerRe share option will be treated in accordance with its terms and converted into an option to purchase, on the same terms and conditions as the PartnerRe share option, a number of Newco common shares that is equal to the number of PartnerRe common shares subject to the PartnerRe share option multiplied by the PartnerRe exchange ratio, at an exercise price per Newco common share equal to the exercise price per share of PartnerRe common share subject to the PartnerRe share option divided by the PartnerRe exchange ratio; (ii) each outstanding PartnerRe share appreciation right will be treated in accordance with its terms and converted into a share appreciation right, on the same terms and conditions as such PartnerRe share appreciation right, for a number of Newco common shares equal to the number of PartnerRe common shares subject to such PartnerRe share appreciation right multiplied by the PartnerRe exchange ratio, at an exercise price per Newco common share equal to the exercise price per PartnerRe common share subject to such PartnerRe share appreciation right divided by the PartnerRe exchange ratio; and (iii) each other share-based award granted by PartnerRe which under its terms becomes fully vested and settled as of the effective time will vest and be settled in accordance with its terms (and any such performance share units will vest and settle as if the maximum performance were achieved) and each PartnerRe common share delivered in settlement thereof will be eligible to receive the consideration for a PartnerRe common share described above; and (iv) each other share-based award granted by PartnerRe which is not vested as of the effective time will be converted into an award, on the same terms and conditions as such PartnerRe share-based award, with respect to a number of Newco common shares equal to the number of PartnerRe common shares underlying such PartnerRe share-based award multiplied by the PartnerRe exchange ratio.
Also at the effective time: (i) each AXIS restricted share award will be converted into an award, on the same terms and conditions as such AXIS restricted share award (including applicable vesting requirements), with respect to a
number of Newco common shares equal to the number of AXIS common shares subject to such AXIS restricted share award; and (ii) each other share-based award granted by AXIS will be converted into an award, on the same terms and conditions as such AXIS share-based award (including applicable vesting requirements), with respect to a number of Newco common shares equal to the number of AXIS common shares underlying such AXIS share-based award. Notwithstanding the foregoing, certain AXIS restricted share awards and other share-based awards granted in 2014 will become fully vested as of the effective time.
The amalgamation agreement contains various customary representations and warranties that, with certain limited exceptions, each of PartnerRe and AXIS make to the other relating to, among other things:
| · | organization, good standing and corporate power; |
| · | authorization to enter into the amalgamation agreement and to consummate the transactions contemplated thereby; |
| · | approval of such party’s board of directors in connection with the amalgamation; |
| · | enforceability of the amalgamation agreement; |
| · | absence of conflicts with, or violations of: (i) organizational documents, (ii) applicable law or order or (iii) contracts (except reinsurance contracts), indentures or other instruments in each case as a result of the amalgamation or entry into the amalgamation agreement; |
| · | ownership of subsidiaries; |
| · | consents, approvals, registrations and filings with governmental entities required to be made or obtained before the closing in connection with entry into the amalgamation agreement and the consummation of the amalgamation; |
| · | the required vote of such party’s shareholders; |
| · | the filing, accuracy and completeness of such party’s SEC reports; |
| · | the preparation and presentation of financial statements, disclosure controls and the absence of material weaknesses in internal controls; |
| · | the absence of undisclosed liabilities and compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002; |
| · | the absence of certain changes since September 30, 2014; |
| · | the absence of pending or threatened legal and arbitration proceedings and investigations; |
| · | investments and derivatives; |
| · | insurance matters, including statements and reports filed with applicable insurance regulatory authorities and the enforceability of ceded reinsurance contracts; |
| · | labor relations and other employment-related matters; |
| · | real property and personal property; |
| · | governmental permits and compliance with applicable laws; |
| · | inapplicability of takeover statutes to the amalgamation agreement and the amalgamation; |
| · | interested party transactions; |
| · | insurance policies maintained by each party; |
| · | accuracy of information supplied for inclusion in this joint proxy statement/prospectus; |
| · | the opinion of: (i) Goldman Sachs to the AXIS board of directors and (ii) Credit Suisse to the PartnerRe board of directors (each as described in the sections of this joint proxy statement/prospectus titled “The Amalgamation—Opinion of AXIS’ Financial Advisor” and “The Amalgamation—Opinion of PartnerRe’s Financial Advisor” respectively); |
| · | broker’s fees payable in connection with the amalgamation; |
| · | the amalgamation’s qualification as a “reorganization” under applicable tax law; |
| · | environmental matters; and |
| · | the absence of other representations or warranties. |
Some of the representations and warranties of each party in the amalgamation agreement are qualified by knowledge, materiality thresholds or a “material adverse effect” clause. Each party’s representations and warranties are qualified by its publicly available disclosures filed with the SEC after January 1, 2014 and before January 23, 2015 (other than disclosures contained in the “Risk Factors” or “Forward-Looking Statements” sections of such SEC reports or that otherwise constitute risk factors or that are cautionary, predictive or forward-looking in nature).
For purposes of the amalgamation agreement, a “material adverse effect” on AXIS or PartnerRe, as the case may be, means, any event, circumstance, change or effect that is materially adverse (a) to the business, operations, assets or financial condition of such party or its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or (b) on the ability of such party to perform its obligations under the amalgamation agreement without material delay or impairment; provided, that, for the purposes of clause (a) in no event shall any of the following, alone or in combination, be deemed to constitute, nor shall any effects resulting from any of the following be taken into account in determining whether there has been, or will be, a material adverse effect:
| 1. | a change in general political, legislative, economic or financial market conditions or securities, credit, financial or other capital markets or currency conditions; |
| 2. | the commencement, continuation or escalation of actions or war, armed hostilities, sabotage, acts of terrorism or other man-made disaster; |
| 3. | changes, circumstances or events generally affecting the property and casualty insurance and reinsurance industry in the geographic areas and product markets in which such party or its subsidiaries conduct business; |
| 4. | any change in any applicable law; |
| 5. | any change in U.S. generally accepted accounting principles or applicable statutory accounting principles following the date of the amalgamation agreement; |
| 6. | liabilities under policies of insurance written or assumed reinsurance contracts from any terrorist act, earthquake, hurricane, tsunami, tornado, windstorm, epidemic or other natural or man-made disaster; |
| 7. | the public announcement of the execution of the amalgamation agreement or the consummation of the amalgamation, including the impact thereof on relationships, contractual or otherwise, withcustomers, cedents, reinsureds, retrocessionaires, reinsurance brokers or intermediaries, suppliers, vendors, lenders, venture partners or employees; |
| 8. | any decline, in and of itself, in the market price, or change in trading volume, of the PartnerRe common shares or AXIS common shares, as applicable; |
| 9. | the failure, in and of itself, to meet any revenue, earnings or other projections, forecasts or predictions for any period ending following January 25, 2015; |
| 10. | any action taken at the written request of the other party; or |
| 11. | any change or announcement of a potential change in a party’s or any of its subsidiaries’ credit or claims paying rating or the rating of any of its or its subsidiaries’ businesses or securities, |
except: (i) in the case of the foregoing clauses (1) through (5) to the extent those events, circumstances, changes or effects have a disproportionate effect on such party and its subsidiaries compared to other companies of similar size operating in the industries and geographic regions in which such party and its subsidiaries operate; and (ii) the exceptions described in the foregoing clauses (8) and (9) shall not prevent or otherwise affect a determination that any underlying changes, state of facts, circumstances, events or effects have resulted in, or contributed to, a material adverse effect.
In most instances, the representations and warranties of a party in the amalgamation agreement that are qualified by “material adverse effect” are qualified to the extent that the failure of such representations or warranties to be true and correct would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a “material adverse effect” on such party and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole. The representations and warranties of the parties in the amalgamation agreement do not survive after the effective time.
Please see the introduction to this section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus titled “The Amalgamation Agreement” for additional information regarding the nature of the representations and warranties in the amalgamation agreement.
Except as required by applicable law, or as set forth in the parties’ disclosure letters or with the written consent of the other party (such consent not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed), during the period from the execution of the amalgamation agreement to the effective time, PartnerRe and AXIS shall, and shall cause each of their respective subsidiaries: (i) to conduct its operations only in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice, (ii) to use its commercially reasonable efforts to maintain and preserve intact its business, maintain its permits and to preserve the goodwill of its customers, cedents, reinsureds, retrocessionaires, reinsurance brokers, regulators, suppliers and other persons with whom it has material business relationships and (iii) without limiting the generality of the preceding clauses (i) and (ii), not to take any of the following actions:
| 1. | amend or propose to amend its organizational documents (other than, in the case of AXIS, the bye-law amendment proposal) or waive any requirement thereof; |
| 2. | declare or pay any dividends or make other distributions on its share capital, other than (A) dividends paid by a direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiary to it or its wholly owned subsidiaries and (B) ordinary course quarterly cash dividends on PartnerRe common shares and PartnerRe preferred shares or AXIS common shares and AXIS preferred shares, as applicable, with record and payment dates consistent with past practice, provided, that, in the case of clause (B), (i) the quarterly cash dividends payable in respect of PartnerRe common shares shall be permitted to increase in an amount not to exceed $0.70 per share per quarter, (ii) the quarterly cash dividends payable with respect of the AXIS common shares shall not be increased from their current amount ofo $0.29 and (iii) each of PartnerRe and AXIS shall be entitled to pay, for the quarter in which the closing date occurs, a pro rata dividend for the period from the first day of such quarter until the day immediately preceding the closing date; |
| 3. | (A) adjust, subdivide, consolidate or reclassify its share capital or issue, deliver or sell or authorize or propose the issuance, delivery or sale of any other securities in respect of, in lieu of or in substitution for, its share capital; (B) redeem, purchase or otherwise acquire, directly or indirectly, any shares or any securities convertible or exchangeable into or exercisable for any shares, (C) grant any person any right or option to acquire any shares, (D) issue, deliver or sell any additional shares or any securities convertible or exchangeable into or exercisable for any shares or securities (other than repurchases in the ordinary course pursuant to employee benefit plans or employment agreements, in each case in effect on the date of the amalgamation agreement); or (E) enter into any contract, understanding or arrangement with respect to the sale, voting, registration or repurchase of its share capital, except, as may be applicable in each of the preceding clauses (A) to (E), for: (i) the issuance of AXIS common shares or PartnerRe common shares upon the exercise or settlement of share options or other equity-related awards outstanding on the date of the amalgamation agreement under the AXIS share plans or PartnerRe share plans, (ii) issuances, sales or transfers by a wholly owned subsidiary of share capital, to it or another of its wholly shared subsidiaries, and (iii) certain grants of equity awards certain employees; |
| 4. | except as required by certain existing benefit plans, certain accrued bonuses or as otherwise disclosed to the other party: (A) grant or increase any severance, change in control, retention or termination payments or benefits or any equity or equity-based compensation to any employee, director, officer, independent contractor or consultant (such persons, collectively, “associates”) other than for certain existing equity awards or certain non-equity based compensation in the ordinary course of business with respect to employees who are not directors or executive officers, (B) increase (or commit to increase) the compensation, bonus or benefits of any of its associates other than certain existing equity awards and non-equity in the ordinary course of business with respect to employees who are not directors or executive officers, (C) establish, adopt, terminate or amend any benefit plan (or any such benefit plan, agreement, program, policy or commitment or other arrangement that would be a benefit plan if it were in existence on the date of the amalgamation agreement) other than routine changes to welfare plans, (D) take any affirmative action to accelerate the vesting or payment of compensation or benefits under any benefit plan (including any outstanding awards of equity or equity-based compensation), (E) hire or promote any associate or (F) terminate, without “cause,” any employees other than, in the case of clauses (E) and (F), in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practice (but subject certain specified exceptions); |
| 5. | acquire any business or any entity or division thereof, or any substantial portion of any of the foregoing, or sell, lease, transfer, license or encumber any of its material assets, product lines, businesses, rights or properties, other than (as may be applicable): (A) transactions between it and any of its wholly owned subsidiaries or transactions between any such subsidiaries, (B) the acquisition or disposition of investment assets in the ordinary course of business and in accordance with its investment guidelines, (C) acquisitions or dispositions, in either case by lease or license, of immaterial or obsolete tangible assets in the ordinary course of business, and (D) the creation or incurrence of permitted liens; |
| 6. | establish, adopt or enter into any collective bargaining agreement or similar labor agreement; |
| 7. | make or authorize any capital expenditures individually in excess of $2,000,000; |
| 8. | (A) enter into, terminate, or modify and amend in any material respect any material contract, (B) enter into any new ceded reinsurance contracts except in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice, (C) enter into any new contracts that would limit or otherwise restrict it, its subsidiaries, or Newco or its subsidiaries from engaging or competing in any line of business, in any geographic area or with any person or entity in any material respect, (D) enter into or modify or amend any contract constituting or relating to an interested party transaction, (E) enter into or modify any contract involving the assumption or insurance by it or any of its subsidiaries of liabilities other than in material compliance with their existing risk management and underwriting policies, practices and guidelines, (F) terminate, cancel or request any material change or waive any of its material rights in any material contract, ceded reinsurance contract or real property lease or (G) enter, to the extent material, any new lines of business, class or any markets in which it did not operate; |
| 9. | incur, assume, guarantee or prepay any indebtedness, issue or sell any debt securities or other rights to acquire any debt securities of it or any of its subsidiaries, or enter into any “keep well” or other agreement to maintain any financial condition of another person, or enter into any swap or hedging transaction or other derivative agreements, other than (A) indebtedness incurred under the PartnerRe credit facilities or the AXIS credit facilities, as applicable, to support the insurance and reinsurance obligations of its insurance subsidiaries in the ordinary course of their business, (B) any amendment or replacement of the PartnerRe credit facilities or AXIS credit facilities (as the case may be) in connection with the amalgamation, (C) indebtedness for borrowed money among it and any of its wholly-owned subsidiaries (or otherwise among any of its wholly-owned subsidiaries) and (D) any swap or hedging transaction or other derivative agreements entered into: (x) in the ordinary course of business in connection with investment assets and in accordance with its investment guidelines or (y) in the ordinary course of business in connection with its weather and commodities business; |
| 10. | (A) make any loans, advances or capital contributions to, or investments in, any other person or entity, other than to any of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, or (B) make, forgive or discharge, in whole or in part, any loans or advances to any of its current or former associates; |
| 11. | change its accounting policies or procedures, subject to certain exceptions; |
| 12. | change any material method of tax accounting, settle or compromise any audit or other proceeding relating to a material amount of tax, make or change any material tax election or file any material tax return, agree to an extension or waiver of the statute of limitations with respect to the assessment or determination of a material amount of taxes, enter into any closing agreement with respect to any material amount of taxes or surrender any right to claim any material tax refund; |
| 13. | alter or amend in any material respect any existing underwriting, claim handling, loss control, investment, reserving or actuarial practice, guideline or policy or any material assumption underlying any reserves or actuarial practice or policy, subject to certain exceptions; |
| 14. | settle or compromise any legal action, other than a settlement that (A) is solely for monetary damages for an amount not to exceed $500,000 for any such settlement individually or $2 million in the aggregate, and (B) is in the ordinary course for claims under policies and reinsurance contracts within applicable policy or contractual limits; |
| 15. | acquire or dispose of any investment assets in any manner inconsistent with its investment guidelines; |
| 16. | amend, modify or otherwise change its investment guidelines in any material respect; |
| 17. | adopt or enter into any plan or agreement of complete or partial liquidation or dissolution, merger, amalgamation, consolidation, restructuring, recapitalization or other reorganization; |
| 18. | cancel any material indebtedness or waive any claims or rights of material value, in each case other than in the ordinary course of business; |
| 19. | abandon, modify, waive or terminate any material permit; or |
| 20. | agree, authorize or commit to do any of the foregoing. |
Except as described below, PartnerRe and AXIS have agreed that, from the date of the amalgamation agreement until the closing or, if earlier, the termination of the amalgamation agreement in accordance with its terms, neither it nor any of its subsidiaries will, and that it will use its reasonable best efforts to cause its and its subsidiaries’ directors, officers, employees, agents, investment bankers, attorneys, accountants and other representatives not to, directly or indirectly:
| · | initiate, solicit or take any action to knowingly facilitate or knowingly encourage any inquiry or requests for information with respect to, or the making of, or that could reasonably be expected to result in an “acquisition proposal” (as described below); |
| · | enter into, participate or engage in any negotiations concerning, or provide any non-public information or data to any person relating to it or any of its subsidiaries, or afford access to such party’s properties and books in connection with an acquisition proposal or indication of interest that could reasonably be expected to result in an acquisition proposal; |
| · | approve or recommend, or propose publicly to approve or recommend, any acquisition proposal; |
| · | approve or recommend, or propose publicly to approve or recommend, or execute or enter into, any letter of intent, agreement in principle, merger or amalgamation agreement, acquisition agreement, option agreement or other similar agreement relating to any acquisition proposal; |
| · | terminate, amend, release, modify or fail to enforce any provision of, or grant any permission, waiver or request under, any confidentiality, standstill or similar agreement or obligations of any person; or |
| · | propose publicly or commit, authorize or agree to do any of the foregoing relating to any acquisition proposal. |
For purposes of the amalgamation agreement, an “acquisition proposal,” when used with respect to PartnerRe or AXIS, means any proposal or offer made by any third-party with respect to:
| · | a merger, amalgamation, consolidation, share exchange, business combination, reorganization, recapitalization, dissolution, liquidation or similar transaction with PartnerRe or AXIS, as applicable; |
| · | any purchase of an equity interest (including by means of a tender or exchange offer) of 15% or more of the voting or economic interests in PartnerRe or AXIS, as applicable; or |
| · | any purchase of assets, securities or ownership interests representing 15% or more of the consolidated assets, consolidated net revenues or earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization of PartnerRe or AXIS and their subsidiaries taken as a whole, as applicable; |
Except as described below, each of PartnerRe and AXIS have also agreed that, prior to the closing date, neither their respective board of directors nor any committee thereof will, directly or indirectly:
| · | withhold, withdraw, modify or qualify, or publicly propose to withhold, withdraw, modify or qualify, in a manner adverse to the other party, their respective board recommendation that the AXIS shareholders or PartnerRe shareholders (as the case may be) vote affirmatively to adopt the amalgamation agreement, the statutory amalgamation agreement and the amalgamation; |
| · | approve, adopt, recommend or declare advisable, or publicly propose to approve, adopt, recommend or declare advisable, any acquisition proposal; |
| · | if a tender offer or exchange offer for any outstanding shares of such party’s share capital is commenced, fail to recommend against the acceptance of such tender offer or exchange offer by such party’s shareholders (which includes taking no position or a neutral position) within five business days of the commencement thereof (or in the event of a change in the terms of the tender offer or exchange offer, within five business days of the announcement of such change); or |
| · | fail to include in this joint proxy statement/prospectus their respective board recommendation that the AXIS shareholders or PartnerRe shareholders (as the case may be) vote affirmatively to adopt the amalgamation agreement, the statutory amalgamation agreement and the amalgamation. |
Any of the four actions described in the immediately preceding paragraph are referred to in this joint proxy statement/prospectus as a “change of recommendation.”
Until the earlier of the receipt of their respective requisite shareholder vote and the termination of the amalgamation agreement in accordance with its terms, if PartnerRe or AXIS receives (such party, the “receiving party”) a written unsolicited bona fide acquisition proposal that the board of directors of the receiving party has determined in good faith, after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisors: (i) constitutes a “superior proposal” (as described below) or (ii) would reasonably be likely to result in a superior proposal, then the receiving party may (A) furnish or disclose non-public information to the third-party making such acquisition proposal if such third-party executes a confidentiality agreement with customary provisions not materially less favorable in the aggregate to the receiving party than the existing confidentiality agreement, dated January 17, 2015, between PartnerRe or AXIS, and (B) engage in discussions or negotiations with such third-party with respect to its acquisition proposal, in each case, only if the receiving party’s board determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside legal counsel that failure to do so would violate the fiduciary duties of the receiving party’s board under applicable law.
For purposes of the amalgamation agreement, “superior proposal” when used with respect to PartnerRe or AXIS, means a bona fide written acquisition proposal made after the date of the amalgamation agreement (except that references in the definition of “acquisition proposal” to 15% are replaced by 50%) on terms that the board of directors of the receiving party determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisors, and considering factors it believes to be appropriate (including all terms and conditions of the acquisition proposal, the timing and likelihood of consummation, closing conditions and break-up fees), are more favorable to the receiving party than the amalgamation, after taking into account any change to the terms of the amalgamation subsequently proposed by the other party.
Nothing contained in the amalgamation agreement, however, will prevent the AXIS board of directors or the PartnerRe board of directors, at any time prior to the receipt of its respective requisite shareholder vote, in response to the receipt of a written unsolicited bona fide acquisition proposal from effecting a change of recommendation if the AXIS board of directors or the PartnerRe board of directors, as the case may be, determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisors, that (x) failure to make such change of recommendation would violate the respective fiduciary duties of the AXIS board of directors or the PartnerRe board of directors, as the case may be, under applicable law and (y) such acquisition proposal constitutes a superior proposal; provided, that, the AXIS board of directors or the PartnerRe board of directors, as the case may be, will not be permitted to make a change of recommendation: (A) until at least five business days have passed following the PartnerRe board of directors’ or the AXIS board of directors’ respective receipt of a written notice from the other party that includes the reasons for the change of recommendation and the material terms and conditions of the superior proposal (including any proposed agreement, the identity of the third-party, its sources of financing (if any) and any agreements related to financing (and any change in financial or other material terms of such proposal will require an additional five business day notice to the other party)); (B) during such five business day period (i) the AXIS board of directors or the PartnerRe board of directors, as applicable, provides the other party with a reasonable opportunity to make any adjustments to the terms and conditions of the amalgamation agreement and the amalgamation so that the acquisition proposal ceases to be a superior proposal, and negotiates with such party in good faith with respect to any adjustments; and (ii) the AXIS board of directors or the PartnerRe board of directors, as applicable, has determined in good faith at the end of such five business day period, after considering the results of the negotiations and the revised proposals made by the other party, and after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisor, that the superior proposal giving rise to the written notice continues to be a superior proposal and that a failure to make a change in its recommendation would violate its fiduciary duties under applicable laws; (C) unless the AXIS board of directors or the PartnerRe board of directors, as the case may be, has not materially breached its obligations described under this section “—No Solicitation of Acquisition Proposals.”
Even if PartnerRe or AXIS, as the case may be, has made a change of recommendation such party shall still be required to call and hold their respective shareholders’ meeting for the purpose of obtaining their respective requisite shareholder vote in connection with the amalgamation.
Each of PartnerRe and AXIS will: (i) promptly orally notify the other party of any request for information or inquiries relating to an acquisition proposal, indicating the identity of the person making such request, inquiry, proposal or offer and the material terms and conditions of any proposals or offers (including copies of the most recent version of the proposed agreement and financing agreements (if any)), (ii) provide to the other party with written notice of any inquiry, proposal or offer within 24 hours of receipt and copies of any related written or electronic correspondence, (iii) keep the other party informed orally, as soon as is reasonably practicable, of the status and terms of any acquisition proposal, and (iv) provide any information to the other party (that was not previously provided) that it is furnishing to a third-party, pursuant to the provisions described in this section “—No Solicitation of Acquisition Proposals,” at substantially the same time it provides such information to such other third-party.
Each of PartnerRe and AXIS also agreed that it and its subsidiaries will: (i) immediately cease and terminate any existing activities, solicitations, discussions or negotiations, if any, with any third-party or its representatives conducted prior to the date of the amalgamation agreement with respect to any acquisition proposal, (ii) request that any such third-party and its representatives that has executed a confidentiality agreement in the 24-month period prior to the date of the amalgamation agreement that relates to an acquisition proposal with PartnerRe and AXIS (as the case may be) return or destroy as promptly as practicable all confidential information respectively furnished by PartnerRe or AXIS; (iii) immediately take all steps necessary to the extent reasonably possible to terminate any approval under any confidentiality, “standstill” or similar provision that may have been previously given by PartnerRe or AXIS to any third person to make an acquisition proposal; and (iv) take the necessary steps to promptly inform their representatives of their obligations described in this section “—No Solicitation of Acquisition Proposals.”
Each of PartnerRe and AXIS have agreed to hold their respective shareholders’ meeting within 45 days of the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus is a part, and to use their respective reasonable best efforts to solicit the requisite shareholder approval for the proposals to approve the amalgamation agreement, the statutory amalgamation agreement and the amalgamation and in the case of AXIS, the bye-law amendment. The amalgamation agreement requires each of PartnerRe and AXIS to submit these proposals to a shareholder vote even if its respective board of directors has changed its recommendation related to such proposals, and this joint proxy statement/prospectus and any accompanying materials may include appropriate disclosure with respect to such adverse recommendation change if and to the extent the PartnerRe or AXIS board of directors (as the case may be) determines that the failure to include such disclosure would violate its fiduciary duties under applicable laws. The parties have also agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to hold their respective special general meetings on the same date.
PartnerRe and AXIS agreed, upon the terms and subject to the conditions of the amalgamation agreement, to use their respective reasonable best efforts to take, or cause to be taken, all actions, and to do, or cause to be done, and to assist and cooperate with the other party in doing, all things necessary or proper or advisable to consummate and make effective, in the most expeditious manner practicable and in any event prior to the end date (described below under “—Termination of the Amalgamation Agreement”) the amalgamation, including:
| · | the obtaining of all necessary actions or nonactions, waivers, consents, licenses, permits, authorizations, orders and approvals from governmental entities and the making of all other necessary registrations and filings, |
| · | the obtaining of all consents, approvals or waivers from third parties that are necessary or desirable or required in connection with the amalgamation and are material to the business of AXIS or PartnerRe, as the case may be, |
| · | the preparation of the registration statement and the joint proxy statement, |
| · | the execution and delivery of any additional instruments necessary to complete the transactions contemplated by the amalgamation agreement; and |
| · | the providing of all such information concerning such party, its affiliates and its affiliates’ officers, directors, employees and partners as may reasonably be requested or necessary in connection with any statement, filing, action, application or matters described in this section of the joint proxy statement/prospectus “—Efforts to Complete the Amalgamation.” |
In connection with the foregoing, however, neither party will be required to sell, divest or hold separate or otherwise dispose of any assets, product lines or businesses, Newco will not be required to conduct the business of either AXIS or PartnerRe or their subsidiaries, taken as whole after giving effect to the amalgamation, in a specified manner following the effective time, and no party will be required to take any action (including any of the foregoing actions) if such action would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on Newco or its subsidiaries taken as whole after giving effect to the amalgamation. The actions described in this paragraph shall be collectively referred to as “regulatory material adverse effect.”
See the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus titled “The Amalgamation—Regulatory Clearances Required for the Amalgamation”, for a description of the material regulatory approvals required for consummation of the amalgamation.
The amalgamation agreement contains certain provisions relating to the governance of Newco following the effective time, which may also be reflected in the bye-laws of Newco that are attached hereto as an exhibit to the statutory amalgamation agreement.
Board of Directors
The full board of directors of Newco will consist of 14 directors (collectively, the “post-closing directors”), to comprise of seven directors initially designated by AXIS (the “AXIS board designees”) and seven directors initially designated by PartnerRe (the “PartnerRe board designees”). One PartnerRe board designee shall be Jean-Paul Montupet and one AXIS board designee will be Albert Benchimol. The post-closing directors will serve until the earlier of their resignation or removal or until their respective successors are elected or appointed in accordance with the bye-laws of Newco.
PartnerRe and AXIS agreed to take all actions reasonably necessary so that the Newco board of directors designates the following six committees: audit, risk, nominating and corporate governance, finance, compensation and executive. Each such committee will be composed of post-closing directors drawn equally from the AXIS board designees and the PartnerRe board designees who will serve until the earlier of their resignation or removal or until their respective successors are elected or appointed or such other time as the board of directors of Newco determines to reconstitute or eliminate such committee, in each case in accordance with the bye-laws of Newco. The initial chairpersons of the risk, nominating and corporate governance and compensation committees of the Newco board of directors will be designated by the AXIS board of directors in its sole discretion and the initial chairpersons of the audit, finance and executive committees of the Newco board of directors will designated by the PartnerRe board of directors in its sole discretion. Such initial chairpersons will serve until the earlier of their resignation or removal or until their respective successors are duly elected or appointed or such other time as the as the board of directors of Newco company determines to reconstitute or eliminate such committee, in each case in accordance with the bye-laws of Newco.
President and Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
Immediately after the effective time Albert Benchimol will be appointed as the president and Chief Executive Officer of Newco and Jean-Paul Montupet will be elected as the Chairman of the Newco board of directors. The bye-laws of Newco will also provide that: (i) until the third anniversary of the effective date, the affirmative vote of 75% of the Newco board of directors (excluding interested directors, employees and officers) will be required to remove Mr. Benchimol or Mr. Montupet from such roles, (ii) any amendments to the preceding provisions relating to the removal of Mr. Benchimol or Mr. Montupet will require the affirmative vote of 75% of the Newco board of directors (excluding interested directors, employees and officers) and (iii) the Newco board of directors will consist of a staggered board.
Following the effective time, Newco will indemnify, defend and hold harmless, and provide advancement of expenses to, the present and former officers and directors of PartnerRe, AXIS and their respective subsidiaries against all losses, claims, damages, judgments, expenses and other liabilities that are paid in settlement of or in connection with any legal action based or arising on such person’s respective service prior to the effective time, whether asserted or claimed prior to, at or after the effective time (including acts or omissions relating to the approval of the amalgamation), to the fullest extent permitted under PartnerRe’s organizational documents and AXIS’ organizational documents (as the case may be) and any indemnification agreement entered into between a party and such person.
In addition, at the effective time Newco will purchase a “tail” directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policy, for the present and former directors and officers of each of PartnerRe, AXIS and their respective subsidiaries who were covered prior to the effective time by existing policies of directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, which provides coverage for six years following the effective time and on other terms that provide at least substantially equivalent benefits to the covered persons as the existing policies.
If Newco consolidates with or merges into any person and is not the surviving company, or transfers substantially all of its assets or properties to any person, then Newco or its respective successors or assigns must ensure that such person assumes Newco’s obligations described under this section of the joint proxy statement/prospectus titled “—Directors’ and Officers’ Indemnification and Insurance.”
Employees of AXIS and PartnerRe will receive service credit for the purposes of eligibility to participate in and vesting (but not for the purposes of benefit accrual or vesting of equity compensation) under the employee benefit plans maintained by Newco, to the same extent that service was recognized prior to the effective time under a comparable plan of AXIS or PartnerRe.
PartnerRe agreed to terminate its employee share purchase plans effective as of the effective time, and to ensure that: (i) no new offering periods will begin after January 25, 2015, (ii) no new participants will be permitted to be enrolled in any employee share purchase plans and existing participants will not be able to increase deferral rates under an employee share purchase plan, and (iii) if the closing occurs during an existing offer period, to take such actions required to end the offering period effective as of the last business day prior to the effective time.
The amalgamation agreement contains certain other covenants and agreements, including covenants relating to:
| · | confidentiality and access by each party to certain information about the other party during the period prior to the effective time; |
| · | each of the parties using its reasonable best efforts to cause the amalgamation to constitute a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended; |
| · | consultation between PartnerRe and AXIS in connection with public announcements; |
| · | the parties taking reasonably necessary actions to cause certain dispositions or acquisitions of AXIS common shares and PRE common shares by certain individuals resulting from the amalgamation to be exempt from Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act; |
| · | using reasonable best efforts to cause Newco common shares issuable in connection with the amalgamation to be approved for listing on the NYSE, subject to official notice of issuance, at the closing; |
| · | notifying the other party of: (i) any communication by a third-party alleging that the consent of such third-party is or maybe required in connection with the amalgamation, (ii) any communication from any governmental entity in connection with the amalgamation, and (iii) any legal actions threatened or commenced against it or any of its subsidiaries or otherwise affecting it or any of its subsidiaries that are related to the amalgamation or (iv) any event which causes or is reasonably likely to cause a material adverse effect; |
| · | (i) notifying the other party of any shareholder litigation (including derivative actions) brought by any of its shareholders relating to the amalgamation agreement or the amalgamation, (ii) providing the other party with the opportunity to participate in the defense or settlement of any such shareholder litigation, and (iii) obtaining the other party’s consent prior to agreeing to any such settlement (which consent may not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed). |
| · | to the extent the parties mutually agree to obtain new credit facilities or obtain amendments or waivers to existing credit facilities, the parties shall use commercially reasonable efforts to cooperate with each other in connection with the credit facilities; |
| · | other than the requisite shareholder votes, each of the parties obtaining all requisite board of directors, shareholder and member approvals, to the extent not obtained prior to the date of the amalgamation agreement, that may be required to be obtained to consummate the transactions; and |
| · | each of the parties fulfilling its obligations to inform and consult with any employee representative bodies (including any unions, labor organizations or works councils) which represent employees affected by the transactions. |
The obligations of PartnerRe and AXIS to consummate the transactions contemplated by the amalgamation agreement are subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the following conditions:
| · | Each of PartnerRe and AXIS shall have obtained the required affirmative vote of its shareholders to adopt and approve the amalgamation agreement, the statutory amalgamation agreement and the amalgamation; |
| · | the Newco common shares to be issued in connection with the amalgamation have been approved for listing on the NYSE, subject to official notice of issuance; |
| · | all transaction approvals have been filed, have occurred or been obtained and are in full force and effect or the waiting periods applicable thereto have terminated or expired, in each case, without causing a regulatory material adverse effect; |
| · | the registration statement on Form S-4, of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus forms a part, has become effective under the Securities Act and is not the subject of any stop order or proceedings seeking a stop order; and |
| · | no law, injunction or order by a governmental entity shall have enjoined, restrained or prohibited the amalgamation or the transactions contemplated by the amalgamation agreement. |
In addition, each of PartnerRe’s and AXIS’ obligations to consummate the transactions are also separately subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the following additional conditions:
| · | subject to the applicable materiality standards provided in the amalgamation agreement, the representations and warranties of the other party in the amalgamation agreement will be true and correct as of the closing date; |
| · | the other party will have performed or complied in all material respects with all obligations and covenants required to be performed by it under the amalgamation agreement; |
| · | since the date of the amalgamation agreement, there has not been any effect, change, event or occurrence that has had, or is reasonably likely to have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect with respect to the other party; |
| · | receipt by each of PartnerRe and AXIS of a duly executed certificate from the other party certifying that the conditions set forth in each of the preceding three bullet points have been satisfied; |
| · | receipt by each of PartnerRe and AXIS of a written tax opinion from such party’s legal counsel with respect to certain U.S. federal income tax consequences of the amalgamation; |
| · | all required actions will have been taken such that, immediately following the effective time, the PartnerRe and the AXIS director designees to Newco will have been appointed and are entitled to serve; and |
| · | the insurance subsidiaries of each party domiciled in Bermuda will have been assigned a financial strength rating of at least “A-” from A.M. Best Company, Inc. |
The amalgamation agreement may be terminated at any time before the effective time by mutual written consent of AXIS and PartnerRe and, subject to certain limitations described in the amalgamation agreement, by either AXIS or PartnerRe if any of the following occurs:
| · | the amalgamation has not been consummated by the end date except that this right of termination is not available to any party whose failure to comply in any material respect with any covenant or obligation under the amalgamation agreement has primarily contributed to the failure of the amalgamation to occur on or before such date; |
| · | if at the PartnerRe special general meeting (including any adjournment or postponement thereof) the requisite approval of the PartnerRe shareholders has not been obtained; |
| · | if at the AXIS special general meeting (including any adjournment or postponement thereof) the requisite approval of the AXIS shareholders has not been obtained; |
| · | a law or regulation prohibits or makes illegal the consummation of the amalgamation, or any order restrains, enjoins or otherwise prohibits consummation of the amalgamation and such order shall have become final and nonappealable, except that this right of termination shall not be available to any party whose failure to comply in any material respect with any covenant or obligation under the amalgamation agreement has primarily caused the issuance of such order; or |
| · | there has been a material breach by the other party of its representations, warranties, covenants or agreements contained in the amalgamation agreement, which breach would result in the failure of certain closing conditions to be satisfied on or prior to the end date, and such breach is not capable of being cured or has not been cured within 30 business days after detailed written notice of such breach has been received by the party alleged to be in breach. |
Termination by AXIS
The amalgamation agreement may also be terminated, at any time prior to obtaining the required vote of the PartnerRe shareholders, by AXIS, if any of the following occurs:
| · | the PartnerRe board of directors effects a change of recommendation; or |
| · | an acquisition proposal with respect to PartnerRe was publicly announced or disclosed (or any person has publicly announced an intention (whether or not conditional) to make such acquisition proposal) after the date of the amalgamation agreement and the PartnerRe board of directors fails to publicly affirm its recommendation that the PartnerRe shareholders adopt the amalgamation agreement within five business days after receipt of a written request from AXIS to do so; or |
| · | the PartnerRe board of directors publicly announces an intention to take any of the foregoing actions described in the two preceding bullet points; or |
| · | PartnerRe has materially breached (A) its obligations regarding the holding of its special general meeting or (B) its non-solicitation obligations under the amalgamation agreement. |
Termination by PartnerRe
The amalgamation agreement may also be terminated, at any time prior to obtaining the required vote of the AXIS shareholders, by PartnerRe, if any of the following occurs:
| · | The AXIS board of directors effects a change of recommendation; or |
| · | an acquisition proposal with respect to AXIS was publicly announced or disclosed (or any person has publicly announced an intention (whether or not conditional) to make such an acquisition proposal) after the date of the amalgamation agreement and the AXIS board of directors fails to publicly affirm its |
| | recommendation that the AXIS shareholders adopt the amalgamation agreement within five business days after receipt of a written request from PartnerRe to do so; or |
| · | The AXIS board of directors publicly announces an intention to take any of the foregoing actions described in the two preceding bullet points; or |
| · | AXIS has materially breached (A) its obligations regarding the holding of its special general meeting or (B) its non-solicitation obligations under the amalgamation agreement. |
PartnerRe and AXIS agreed to use their reasonable best efforts to cause the PartnerRe common shares and AXIS common shares to be de-listed from the NYSE and deregistered under the Exchange Act promptly following the effective time.
If the amalgamation agreement is terminated as described in the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus titled “—Termination of the Amalgamation Agreement” the amalgamation agreement will become void and have no effect (other than the survival of certain provisions including those relating to confidentiality), without any liability of any party or its directors, officers or shareholders, except that no party shall be relieved of liability for fraud or any willful and intentional breach of any provision of the amalgamation agreement. If it is judicially determined that the termination of the amalgamation agreement was caused by a willful and intentional breach of the amalgamation agreement, then, in addition to other remedies at law or equity for a willful and intentional breach of the amalgamation agreement, the party so found to be willfully and intentionally breaching the amalgamation agreement will indemnify and hold harmless the other parties for their respective reasonable out-of-pocket costs, fees and expenses of their counsel, accountants, financial advisors and other experts and advisors as well as fees and expenses incident to negotiation, preparation and execution of the amalgamation agreement, including severance costs and related expenses, and related documentation and shareholders’ meetings and consents.
Termination Fee
Upon payment by AXIS or PartnerRe, as the case may be, of the termination fee of $250 million (the “termination fee”) in full, such party will no longer be required to indemnify and hold harmless the other parties for their respective costs pursuant to the provision described in the preceding sentence.
AXIS will be obligated to pay the termination fee to PartnerRe or its designee:
| · | following termination of the amalgamation agreement for any reason pursuant to the provisions described under the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus titled “—Termination of the Amalgamation Agreement—Termination by PartnerRe;” or |
| · | if PartnerRe terminates the amalgamation agreement because: (i) AXIS materially breaches its representations, warranties, covenants or agreements so that the related closing condition fails or (ii) the end date is reached, in each case following the public announcement of an acquisition proposal with respect to AXIS, and within 12 months after the date of such termination AXIS enters into a letter of intent, agreement-in-principle, acquisition agreement or other similar agreement with respect to, or publicly announces or consummates, a business combination (as defined below). |
PartnerRe will be obligated to pay the termination fee to AXIS or its designee:
| · | following termination of the amalgamation agreement for any reason pursuant to the provision described under the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus titled “—Termination of the Amalgamation Agreement—Termination by AXIS;” or |
| · | if AXIS terminates the amalgamation agreement because: (i) PartnerRe materially breaches its representations, warranties, covenants or agreements so that the related closing condition fails or (ii) the end date is reached, in each case following the public announcement of an acquisition proposal with respect to PartnerRe, and within 12 months after the date of such termination PartnerRe enters into a letter of |
| | intent, agreement-in-principle, acquisition agreement or other similar agreement with respect to, or publicly announces or consummates, a business combination. |
For the purposes of the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus titled “—Effect of Termination,” the term “business combination” shall mean any merger, amalgamation, consolidation, share exchange, business combination, reorganization, recapitalization, dissolution, liquidation or similar transaction involving AXIS, in the case of AXIS, or PartnerRe in the case of PartnerRe, as a result of which the shareholders of AXIS or the shareholders of PartnerRe, as applicable, prior to such transaction in the aggregate cease to own more than 50% of the voting securities of the entity surviving or resulting from such transaction (or the ultimate entity thereof), (ii) any purchase of an equity interest (including by means of a tender or exchange offer) representing an amount equal to or greater than a 50% voting or economic interest in AXIS or PartnerRe, as applicable, or (iii) any purchase of assets, securities or ownership interests representing an amount equal to or greater than 50% of the consolidated assets (including shares of the respective subsidiaries of AXIS or PartnerRe, as applicable), consolidated net revenues or earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization of AXIS and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or PartnerRe and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, as applicable.
No Approval Fee
AXIS will be obligated to pay a fee of $55 million (the “no approval fee”) to PartnerRe or its designee if either party has terminated the amalgamation agreement because the required AXIS shareholder approval has not been obtained (and if PartnerRe is the terminating party, the required PartnerRe shareholder approval has been obtained or such vote has not yet been taken); provided, that, if an acquisition proposal with respect to AXIS was publicly announced prior to the special general meeting of AXIS shareholders at which the required vote of AXIS’ shareholders was not obtained and, within 12 months after the date of such termination, AXIS enters into a letter of intent, agreement-in-principle, acquisition agreement or other similar agreement with respect to, or publicly announces or consummates, a business combination, then AXIS will also pay to PartnerRe or its designee an additional $195 million in cash (in addition to the no approval fee).
PartnerRe will be obligated to pay the no approval fee to AXIS or its designee if either party has terminated the amalgamation agreement because the required PartnerRe shareholder approval has not been obtained (and if AXIS is the terminating party, the required AXIS shareholder approval has been obtained or such vote has not yet been taken); provided, that, if an acquisition proposal with respect to PartnerRe was publicly announced prior to the special general meeting of PartnerRe shareholders at which the required vote of PartnerRe’s shareholders was not obtained and, within 12 months after the date of such termination, PartnerRe enters into a letter of intent, agreement-in-principle, acquisition agreement or other similar agreement with respect to, or publicly announces or consummates, a business combination, then PartnerRe will also pay to AXIS or its designee a further $195 million in cash (in addition to the no approval fee).
Expense Reimbursement
Upon any termination of the amalgamation agreement where the termination fee or the no approval fee is payable, the party liable to pay the termination fee or no approval fee shall, in addition to the payment of the termination fee or the no approval fee, reimburse the other party and its affiliates after such termination for 100% of such party’s out-of-pocket fees, costs, obligations owed to third parties and expenses (including reasonable fees and expenses of their counsel) actually incurred by any of them in contemplation of, or in connection with the consideration, negotiation or implementation of the amalgamation or the other actions contemplated by the amalgamation agreement in an amount not to exceed $35 million.
Except as described above in the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus titled “—Effect of Termination; Liability for Breach” all costs and expenses incurred in connection with the amalgamation agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby will be paid by the party incurring such expenses, although the expenses incurred in connection with filing, printing and mailing the registration statement on Form S-4 and this joint proxy statement/prospectus and otherwise incurred in connection with obtaining the required transaction approvals will be shared equally by AXIS and PartnerRe.
The amalgamation agreement may be amended by the parties in writing, by action of their respective boards of directors, at any time before or after the receipt of the requisite approval of the PartnerRe shareholders or the requisite approval of AXIS shareholders, but after any such shareholder approval, no amendment may be made which by law requires the further approval or authorization by the shareholders of PartnerRe or AXIS without such further shareholder approval or authorization.
Prior to the effective time, PartnerRe and AXIS, by action of their respective boards of directors, may, in writing and to the extent legally allowed: (i) extend the time for performance of any of the obligations or other acts of the other party, (ii) waive any inaccuracies in the representations and warranties of the other party contained in the amalgamation agreement or in any document delivered pursuant to the amalgamation agreement and (iii) waive compliance of the other party with any of the applicable agreements or conditions contained in the amalgamation agreement or any document delivered pursuant to the amalgamation agreement.
The amalgamation agreement is governed by and is to be construed, in all respects, with regard to the laws of New York, including as to validity, interpretation and effect, provided, that any provisions of the amalgamation agreement relating to a director’s or officer’s fiduciary duties, statutory duties, obligations and/or statutory provisions, or which arise under the laws of Bermuda, shall be governed by the laws of Bermuda (including amalgamations under the Companies Act. The parties have agreed and submitted to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of Bermuda (and appropriate appellate courts therefrom) for the purposes of any litigation or other proceeding arising out of or relating to the amalgamation agreement or its subject matter. Each party has agreed to waive any objection to the laying of venue in such courts.
At the effective time, all common shares or preferred shares of AXIS or PartnerRe, as the case may be, held by a dissenting shareholder shall be cancelled and converted into the right to receive the respective amalgamation consideration for such shares set forth in the amalgamation agreement or, as the case may be, preferred shares of Newco. In the event that the fair value of a dissenting share as appraised by the Supreme Court of Bermuda under Section 106(6) of the Companies Act is greater than the consideration or, as the case may be, the value of the preferred share of Newco received for such share pursuant to the terms of the statutory amalgamation agreement, the dissenting shareholder shall be entitled to receive such difference from Newco by payment made within one month after such fair value is finally determined pursuant to such appraisal procedure. Each party must give prompt notice to the other of any demands (or withdrawal thereof) or applications for appraisal and provide the other party with the opportunity to participate and be regularly consulted in any appraisal proceedings or settlement negotiations. Neither party may voluntarily make any payments with respect to or settle any demands or applications for appraisal without the other party’s consent (such consent not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed).
While the amalgamation agreement is not intended, and will not be construed, to create any third-party beneficiaries or confer upon any person other than the parties to the amalgamation agreement any rights, benefits or remedies of any nature, it provides a limited exception for each present and former director and officer of PartnerRe and AXIS to continue to have indemnification, advancement of expenses and liability insurance coverage following the effective time as described under in the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus titled “—Directors’ and Officers’ Indemnification and Insurance”.
PartnerRe and AXIS have recognized and agreed that, if for any reason any of the provisions of the amalgamation agreement are not performed in accordance with their specific terms or are otherwise breached or violated, immediate and irreparable harm or injury would be caused for which money damages would not be an adequate remedy under applicable law. Accordingly, in addition to all other remedies to which a party to the amalgamation agreement may be entitled, each party is also entitled to a decree of specific performance and will further be entitled to an injunction restraining any violation or threatened violation of any of the provisions of the amalgamation agreement without the necessity of posting a bond or other form of security. In the event that any action should be brought in equity to enforce any of the provisions of the amalgamation agreement, no party will allege, and each party has waived the defense, that there is an adequate remedy under applicable law.
Subject to the terms and conditions of the amalgamation agreement and in accordance with applicable laws, PartnerRe and AXIS have agreed to use reasonable best efforts to take, or cause to be taken, all actions and to do, or cause to be done, all things necessary, proper or advisable to close the amalgamation and the other transactions contemplated by the amalgamation agreement in the most expeditious manner practicable, as discussed in the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus titled “The Amalgamation Agreement—Consents and Approvals.”
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in connection with obtaining a required regulatory approval, neither PartnerRe nor AXIS nor any of their respective subsidiaries will be required to agree to take or refrain from taking, any action that would be expected to have a regulatory material adverse effect.
Under the HSR Act, PartnerRe and AXIS cannot close the amalgamation until PartnerRe and AXIS have notified the Antitrust Division and the FTC of the amalgamation and furnished them with certain information and materials relating to the amalgamation and the applicable waiting period has terminated or expired. The termination or expiration of the waiting period means the parties have satisfied the regulatory requirements under the HSR Act. PartnerRe and AXIS filed the required notifications with the Antitrust Division and the FTC on March 3, 2015. The waiting period will generally expire thirty (30) days after the appropriate notification has been filed unless the applicable regulatory agency requests additional information or the parties receive early termination. The parties have requested early termination of the waiting period, but there can be no assurance that early termination will be granted. Competition related notifications may also be required under the U.S. insurance laws in certain states.
Both PartnerRe and AXIS operate in the European Union. The EU Merger Regulation requires notification of and approval by the European Commission of mergers or acquisitions involving parties with worldwide and European Union sales exceeding given thresholds. The European Commission has an initial period of 25 working days after receipt of the notification to issue its decision (“Phase I”). The European Commission may extend this Phase I period to 35 working days if, within the first 20 working days after submission of the notification, the parties propose remedies to address any competition concerns identified by the European Commission. The European Commission may open an extended investigation, which extends Phase I by up to 90 working days, and can be extended to 105 working days if remedies are offered after the 55th working day or to 110 working days by request of the parties or by the Commission with consent of the parties. The amalgamation cannot be consummated until after the European Commission has issued its clearance decision.
PartnerRe and AXIS derive revenues in other jurisdictions where merger or acquisition control filings or clearances are or may be required, including clearances in Canada, Colombia, Turkey, Russia, and Ukraine. In addition, clearance under the Australian Foreign Investment Review Board will also be required. The amalgamation cannot be consummated until after the applicable waiting periods have expired or been terminated or the relevant approvals have been obtained under the antitrust and competition and foreign investment laws of the jurisdictions listed above where filings or approvals are or may be required.
The European Commission, the FTC or other applicable antitrust or competition law authorities may seek or require the imposition of certain conditions on the amalgamation in connection with obtaining antitrust or merger control or foreign investment law clearances. While the parties do not believe that conditions resulting in a material adverse effect are likely to be imposed and does not believe that any antitrust or competition law authority would seek to prevent the amalgamation from closing, there can be no assurances that the applicable antitrust or merger control law authorities will not seek to impose restrictions that may adversely impact the benefits expected to be achieved from the amalgamation including, but not limited to, a prohibition on consummation.
The insurance laws and regulations of all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia generally require that before the acquisition of control of an insurance company, either through the acquisition of or amalgamation with the insurance company or a holding company of that insurance company, the acquiring party must obtain approval from the insurance regulator of the insurance company’s state of domicile. In addition, under the laws of certain states, an acquirer must obtain the approval of the state’s insurance regulator to acquire control of an insurance company that is commercially domiciled in that state.
Applications or notifications in connection with the amalgamation or the changes in control of various subsidiaries of PartnerRe and AXIS that may be deemed to occur as a result of the amalgamation will be filed, pursuant to the amalgamation agreement, with various U.S. state regulatory authorities, including but not limited to the California Insurance Department, the Connecticut Insurance Department, the Delaware Insurance Department, the Illinois Department of Insurance, the New York Department of Financial Services, and the Ohio Department of Insurance.
Applications for approval or notifications to regulators have been filed or will also be filed in certain non-U.S. jurisdictions, including but not limited to, Australia, Bermuda, Canada, Hong Kong, Ireland, Singapore and the United Kingdom.
Although PartnerRe and AXIS do not expect these regulatory authorities to raise any significant concerns in connection with their review of the amalgamation, there is no assurance that PartnerRe and/or AXIS will obtain all required regulatory approvals on a timely basis, if at all, or that these approvals will not include a restriction, limitation or condition that would trigger a burdensome condition, which, in such case, would permit PartnerRe or AXIS to refuse to close the transactions contemplated by the amalgamation agreement and consummate the amalgamation.
Other than the approvals and notifications described above, neither PartnerRe nor AXIS is aware of any material regulatory approvals required to be obtained, or waiting periods required to expire, after the making of a filing. If the parties discover that other approvals or filings and waiting periods are necessary, they will seek to obtain or comply with them, although, as is the case with the regulatory approvals described above, there can be no assurance that they will be obtained on a timely basis, if at all, or would not constitute a regulatory material adverse effect.
The PartnerRe special general meeting will take place at [9:00 a.m.], Atlantic time, on [●], 2015, at PartnerRe’s offices at 90 Pitts Bay Road, Pembroke HM 08 Bermuda.
At the PartnerRe special general meeting, the holders of PartnerRe preferred shares will be asked to consider and vote on only Proposal 1 and Proposal 3 below and the holders of PartnerRe common shares will be asked to consider and vote on all of the following proposals:
| · | Proposal 1: to approve and adopt the amalgamation agreement, the statutory amalgamation agreement and the amalgamation; |
| · | Proposal 2: on an advisory (nonbinding) basis, to approve the compensation that may be paid or become payable to PartnerRe’s named executive officers in connection with the amalgamation; and |
| · | Proposal 3: to approve the adjournment of the special general meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies, if there are insufficient votes to approve the amalgamation proposal at such special meeting. |
Consummation of the amalgamation is conditioned on, among other things, approval of Proposal 1 (the amalgamation proposal) above, but is not conditional on the approval of Proposals 2 and 3.
PartnerRe’s board of directors has unanimously (1) determined that the amalgamation, on the terms and conditions set forth in the amalgamation agreement, is fair to, and in the best interests of, PartnerRe, (2) approved the amalgamation agreement, the statutory amalgamation agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby and (3) resolved that the amalgamation proposal be submitted to the PartnerRe shareholders for their consideration at the PartnerRe special general meeting. Accordingly, PartnerRe’s board of directors unanimously recommends that PartnerRe shareholders vote (1) “FOR” the amalgamation proposal and (2) “FOR” the other proposals described in this joint proxy statement/prospectus in respect of which they are entitled to vote.
Only PartnerRe shareholders of record, as shown on PartnerRe’s register of members, at the close of business on [●], the record date for the PartnerRe special general meeting, will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the PartnerRe special general meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. As of [●], the record date for the PartnerRe special general meeting, there were [●] PartnerRe common shares and [·] PartnerRe preferred shares issued and outstanding. As of the same date, PartnerRe directors, executive officers and their affiliates had the right to vote [●] PartnerRe common shares, representing approximately [●]% of the total PartnerRe common shares issued and outstanding. PartnerRe currently expects that all of its directors and executive officers will vote “FOR” each proposal on the PartnerRe proxy card.
The quorum required at the commencement of the PartnerRe special general meeting to consider the proposals is the presence in person or by proxy of the holders of shares representing not less than 25% of the shares in the capital of PartnerRe (including fractions of a share) at the record date. The quorum required specifically to consider the amalgamation proposal shall be the same.
The holders of PartnerRe preferred shares will be entitled to vote on only the amalgamation proposal and the adjournment proposal, whereas the holders of PartnerRe common shares will be entitled to vote on all of the proposals. The affirmative vote of the majority of the votes cast at the PartnerRe special general meeting, at which a quorum under the PartnerRe bye-laws is present, is required to approve each matter to be acted on, including the amalgamation proposal and any adjournment proposal. Each PartnerRe share, including the PartnerRe preferred shares, will carry the right to approve and adopt the amalgamation proposal. Each PartnerRe share, including the PartnerRe preferred shares, will carry the right to vote on the adjournment proposal. The vote required for each of the proposals is set forth under the description of each proposal in the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus titled “The PartnerRe Special General Meeting – Proposals to be Submitted to PartnerRe Shareholders; Voting Requirements and Recommendations” for more information.
Except as provided below: (i) holders of PartnerRe common shares have one vote for each PartnerRe common share held by them and are entitled to vote on all the proposals voted on at the PartnerRe special general meeting or any adjournment thereof; and (ii) holders of PartnerRe preferred shares have one vote for each PartnerRe preferred share held by them and are entitled to vote on each of the amalgamation proposal and the adjournment proposal.
If any person would be a Ten Percent Shareholder (as such capitalized term is defined in the PartnerRe bye-laws), notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in the PartnerRe bye-laws, the votes conferred by the Controlled Shares (as such capitalized term is defined in the PartnerRe bye-laws) of such person are reduced (and shall automatically be reduced in the future) by whatever amount is necessary so that after any such reduction such person shall not be a Ten Percent Shareholder. In determining the reduction in votes conferred by Controlled Shares pursuant to the PartnerRe bye-laws, the reduction in vote conferred by the Controlled Shares of any person shall be effected proportionately among all the Controlled Shares of such person, provided, however, that if a PartnerRe shareholder owns, or is treated as owning by the application of section 958 of the Code, interests in another PartnerRe shareholder, any reduction in votes conferred by Controlled Shares of such PartnerRe shareholder, any reduction in votes conferred by Controlled Shares of such PartnerRe shareholder (determined solely on the basis of PartnerRe shares held directly by such PartnerRe shareholder and PartnerRe shares attributed to such PartnerRe shareholder) shall be first reduced the votes conferred on the PartnerRe shares held directly by the PartnerRe shareholder that owns directly or through another entity an interest in such PartnerRe shareholder.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the PartnerRe bye-laws, in addition to the above, PartnerRe shares shall not carry rights to vote, or shall have reduced voting rights, to the extent that the PartnerRe Board reasonably determines that it is necessary that such shares should not carry the right to vote or should have reduced voting rights in order to avoid non-deminimis adverse tax, legal or regulatory consequences to PartnerRe or any subsidiary of PartnerRe or any PartnerRe shareholder or affiliate of any PartnerRe shareholder, provided that the PartnerRe board shall use reasonable efforts to exercise such discretion equally among similarly situated PartnerRe shareholders.
Because the applicability of PartnerRe’s voting power reduction bye-law provisions to any particular shareholder depends on facts and circumstances that may be known only to the shareholder or related persons, PartnerRe requests that PartnerRe shareholders holding 9.9% or more of issued PartnerRe shares contact PartnerRe promptly so that PartnerRe may determine whether the voting power of such holder’s PartnerRe shares should be reduced. PartnerRe’s board of directors may require any direct or indirect holder of shares to provide such information as PartnerRe’s board of directors may reasonably request for the purpose of implementing the provision in the PartnerRe bye-laws relating to the adjustment of voting power. If a PartnerRe shareholder fails to respond to such a request, or submits incomplete or inaccurate information in response to such a request, PartnerRe’s board of directors may determine in its sole discretion that such holder’s shares shall carry no or reduced voting rights unless otherwise determined by the PartnerRe board of directors in its reasonable discretion.
Abstentions and, if applicable, “broker non-votes” will be counted toward the presence of a quorum at the special general meeting, but will not be considered votes cast on any proposal brought before the special general meeting. Because the vote required to approve the proposals to be voted upon at the special general meeting is the affirmative vote of the specified required percentage of the votes cast assuming a quorum is present, an abstention or, if applicable, a “broker non-vote” with respect to any proposal to be voted on at the special general meeting will not have the effect of a vote for or against the relevant proposal, but will reduce the number of votes cast and therefore increase the relative influence of those shareholders voting.
Revocation of Proxies
At any time prior to their being voted at the PartnerRe special general meeting, proxies are revocable by written notice to the Secretary of PartnerRe, by a duly executed proxy bearing a later date or by voting in person at the PartnerRe special general meeting.
In this proposal, PartnerRe is asking its shareholders to approve and adopt the amalgamation agreement, the statutory amalgamation agreement and the amalgamation.
The amalgamation cannot be completed unless, among other things, PartnerRe shareholders approve and adopt the amalgamation proposal by the requisite shareholder vote. The approval by PartnerRe shareholders of this proposal for the approval and adoption of the amalgamation proposal IS a condition to closing in the amalgamation. Please see the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus titled “The Amalgamation Agreement—Conditions to the Amalgamation” for more information.
PartnerRe’s board of directors (1) determined that the amalgamation, on the terms and conditions set forth in the amalgamation agreement, is fair to, and in the best interests of, PartnerRe, (2) approved the amalgamation agreement, the statutory amalgamation agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby and (3) resolved that the amalgamation proposal be submitted to the PartnerRe shareholders for their consideration at the special general meeting.
Each PartnerRe share, including the PartnerRe preferred shares, as of the record date will carry the right to vote on this proposal. The approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of a simple majority of the votes cast of PartnerRe shares at the PartnerRe special general meeting, at which a quorum under the PartnerRe bye-laws is present.
PartnerRe’s board of directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR”
this Proposal 1 to approve and adopt the amalgamation proposal.
PartnerRe is providing its shareholders with the opportunity to cast an advisory (nonbinding) vote to approve the “golden parachute” compensation payments that will or may be made by PartnerRe to its named executive officers in connection with the amalgamation, as required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and Rule 14a-21(c) under the Exchange Act. This proposal, commonly known as “say-on-golden parachute” and which is referred to in this joint proxy statement/prospectus as the “golden parachute” compensation proposal, gives PartnerRe shareholders the opportunity to vote on an advisory (nonbinding) basis on the “golden parachute” compensation payments that will or may be paid by PartnerRe to its named executive officers in connection with the amalgamation.
The “golden parachute” compensation that PartnerRe’s named executive officers may be entitled to receive from PartnerRe in connection with the amalgamation is summarized in the table entitled “Golden Parachute Compensation,” which can be found in the section titled “The Amalgamation— Interests of PartnerRe’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Amalgamation” of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Such summary, in table form, includes all compensation and benefits that may or will be paid by PartnerRe to its named executive officers in connection with the amalgamation.
The PartnerRe board of directors encourages you to review carefully the “golden parachute” compensation information disclosed in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
The PartnerRe board of directors unanimously recommends that the shareholders of PartnerRe approve the following resolution:
“RESOLVED, that the shareholders of PartnerRe approve, on an advisory (nonbinding) basis, the compensation that will or may become payable by PartnerRe to its named executive officers in connection with the amalgamation, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402(t) of Regulation S-K in the Golden Parachute Compensation table and the related narrative disclosures.”
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the PartnerRe special general meeting, at which a quorum is present in accordance with PartnerRe’s bye-laws, is required to approve this compensation advisory proposal.
The vote on the “golden parachute” compensation proposal is a vote separate and apart from the vote on the adoption of the amalgamation agreement. Since the vote on the “golden parachute” compensation proposal is advisory only, it will not be binding on either AXIS or PartnerRe. Accordingly, if the amalgamation agreement is adopted and the amalgamation is completed, the compensation payments that are contractually required to be paid by PartnerRe to its named executive officers will or may be paid, subject only to the conditions applicable thereto, regardless of the outcome of the advisory (nonbinding) vote of PartnerRe shareholders.
PartnerRe’s board of directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR”
this Proposal 2 to approve the compensation advisory proposal where a shareholder is entitled to vote in respect of same.
The PartnerRe special general meeting may be adjourned to another time or place, if necessary or appropriate, to permit, among other things, further solicitation of proxies if necessary to obtain additional votes in favor of the amalgamation proposal.
If, at the PartnerRe special general meeting, the number of PartnerRe common and preferred shares present or represented and voting in favor of the amalgamation proposal is insufficient to approve such proposal, PartnerRe intends to move to adjourn the PartnerRe special general meeting in order to solicit additional proxies for the adoption and approval of the amalgamation agreement, the statutory amalgamation agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby. PartnerRe does not intend to call a vote on this proposal if the amalgamation proposal has been approved at the PartnerRe special general meeting.
In this proposal, PartnerRe is asking its shareholders to authorize the holder of any proxy solicited by the PartnerRe board of directors to vote in favor of granting discretionary authority to proxy holders, and each of them individually, to adjourn the PartnerRe special general meeting to another time and place for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies. If PartnerRe shareholders approve this adjournment proposal, PartnerRe could adjourn the PartnerRe special general meeting and any adjourned session of the PartnerRe special general meeting and use the additional time to solicit additional proxies, including the solicitation of proxies from PartnerRe shareholders who have previously voted.
Each PartnerRe share, including the PartnerRe preferred shares, as of the record date will carry the right to vote on this proposal. The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the PartnerRe special general meeting, at which a quorum is present in accordance with PartnerRe’s bye-laws, is required to approve the adjournment proposal.
PartnerRe’s board of directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR”
this Proposal 3 to approve the adjournment proposal.
The AXIS special general meeting will take place at [9:00 a.m.], Atlantic time, on [●], 2015, at AXIS’ offices at 92 Pitts Bay Road, Pembroke HM 08 Bermuda.
At the AXIS special general meeting, the holders of AXIS preferred shares will be asked to consider and vote on only Proposal 2 and Proposal 4 below and the holders of AXIS common shares will be asked to consider and vote on all of the following proposals:
| · | Proposal 1: to approve amending the AXIS bye-laws by inserting the words “(including for the purposes of Section 106(4A) of the Act)” after the first mention of the word “business” in bye-law 38 (Quorum for general meetings) and after the word “meeting” in subparagraph (1) of bye-law 43 (Voting at meetings); |
| · | Proposal 2: to approve and adopt the amalgamation agreement, the statutory amalgamation agreement and the amalgamation; |
| · | Proposal 3: on an advisory (nonbinding) basis, to approve the compensation that may be paid or become payable to AXIS’ named executive officers in connection with the amalgamation; and |
| · | Proposal 4: to approve an adjournment of the AXIS special general meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies, if there are insufficient votes to approve the amalgamation proposal at such special general meeting. |
Consummation of the amalgamation is conditioned on, among other things, approval of Proposal 2 (the amalgamation proposal) above.
The AXIS board of directors has unanimously (1) determined that the bye-law amendment is advisable to and in the best interests of AXIS, and authorized and approved the bye-law amendment, (2) resolved that the bye-law amendment proposal and the amalgamation proposal be submitted to the AXIS shareholders for their consideration at the special general meeting, (3) determined that the amalgamation, on the terms and conditions set forth in the amalgamation agreement, is fair to, and in the best interests of, AXIS, and (4) approved the amalgamation agreement, the statutory amalgamation agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby. Accordingly, the AXIS board of directors unanimously recommends that AXIS shareholders vote (1) “FOR” the bye-law amendment proposal, (2) “FOR” the amalgamation proposal and (3) “FOR” the other proposals described in this joint proxy statement/prospectus in respect of which they are entitled to vote.
Only AXIS shareholders of record, as shown on AXIS’ register of members, at the close of business on [·], the record date for the AXIS special general meeting, will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the AXIS special general meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. As of [·], the record date for the AXIS special general meeting, there were [·] AXIS common shares and [·] AXIS preferred shares issued and outstanding. As of the same date, AXIS directors, executive officers and their affiliates had the right to vote [·] AXIS common shares, representing approximately [·]% of the total AXIS common shares issued and outstanding. AXIS currently expects that all of its directors and executive officers will vote “FOR” each proposal on the AXIS proxy card.
At the commencement of the AXIS special general meeting the quorum required to consider Proposal 1, the bye-law amendment proposal, and Proposal 3, the compensation advisory proposal, is two or more persons present in person and representing in person or by proxy shares representing more than 50% of the aggregate voting power of the AXIS common shares as of the record date. Each AXIS preferred share and common share carries the right to vote on the amalgamation proposal and accordingly, if the bye-law amendment proposal is approved the quorum required to consider the amalgamation proposal is two or more persons present in person and representing in person
or by proxy shares representing more than 50% of the aggregate voting power of all AXIS shares as of the record date. If the bye-law amendment proposal is not approved, then in accordance with the Companies Act, the quorum required to consider the amalgamation proposal is two or more persons at least holding or representing by proxy more than one-third of the issued shares of AXIS as of the record date. Each AXIS preferred share and common share carries the right to vote on the adjournment proposal and accordingly, the quorum required at the AXIS special general meeting to consider the adjournment proposal is two or more persons present in person and representing in person or by proxy shares representing more than 50% of the aggregate voting power of all AXIS shares as of the record date.
The holders of AXIS preferred shares will be entitled to vote on only the amalgamation proposal and the adjournment proposal, whereas the holders of AXIS common shares will be entitled to vote on all of the proposals. Approval of the bye-law amendment proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of the AXIS common shares at the AXIS special general meeting, at which a quorum is present, in accordance with AXIS’ bye-laws. The bye-law amendment will become effective immediately if so approved. Each AXIS share, including the AXIS preferred shares, as of the record date will carry the right to vote on the amalgamation proposal. If the bye-law amendment is approved, the approval of the amalgamation proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the AXIS special general meeting, at which a quorum is present, in accordance with AXIS’ amended bye-laws. If the bye-law amendment is not approved, then in accordance with the Companies Act, the approval of the amalgamation proposal requires the affirmative vote of 75% of the votes cast of AXIS shares at the AXIS special general meeting, at which a quorum is present. The affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast at the AXIS special general meeting, at which a quorum is present in accordance with AXIS’ bye-laws, is required to approve each other matter to be considered, including any adjournment proposal. Each AXIS share, including the AXIS preferred shares, will carry the right to vote on the adjournment proposal.
As of [●], 2015, the record date for the AXIS special general meeting, there were [●] AXIS common shares issued and outstanding and 25,028,430 AXIS preferred shares issued and outstanding (consisting of 28,430 7.5% Series B Preferred Shares, 16,000,000 6.875% Series C Preferred Shares and 9,000,000 5.50% Series D Preferred Shares). Each AXIS preferred share entitles the holder of record to one vote on each of the amalgamation proposal and the adjournment proposal. Except as provided below, holders of AXIS common shares have one vote for each AXIS common share held by them and are entitled to vote, on a non-cumulative basis, on all of the proposals voted on at the AXIS special general meeting or any adjournment thereof.
Pursuant to a mechanism specified in AXIS’ bye-laws, the voting rights exercisable by a shareholder may be limited. In any situation in which the “controlled shares” (as defined below) of a “United States person” (as defined in the Code) or the shares held by a Direct Foreign Shareholder Group (as defined below) would constitute 9.5% or more of the votes conferred by the issued common shares, the voting rights exercisable by a shareholder with respect to such shares shall be limited so that no United States person or Direct Foreign Shareholder Group is deemed to hold 9.5% or more of the voting power conferred by the AXIS common shares. In addition, the AXIS board of directors may limit a shareholder’s voting rights where it deems it necessary to do so to avoid adverse tax, legal or regulatory consequences. “Controlled shares” includes, among other things, all common shares that a United States person owns directly, indirectly or constructively (within the meaning of Section 958 of the Code). A “Direct Foreign Shareholder Group” includes a shareholder or group of commonly controlled shareholders that are not United States persons. This provision shall not apply if a shareholder owns greater than 75% of AXIS’ issued and outstanding shares.
Because the applicability of AXIS’ voting power reduction bye-law provisions to any particular shareholder depends on facts and circumstances that may be known only to the shareholder or related persons, AXIS requests that its shareholders holding 9.5% or more of its issued common shares contact AXIS promptly so that AXIS may determine whether the voting power of such holder’s AXIS common shares should be reduced. The AXIS board of directors may require any direct or indirect holder of shares to provide such information as the AXIS board of directors may reasonably request for the purpose of determining whether that shareholder’s voting rights are to be adjusted. If an AXIS shareholder fails to respond to such a request, or submits incomplete or inaccurate information in response to such a request, the AXIS board of directors may determine in its sole discretion that such holder’s common shares shall carry no voting rights, in which case such holder shall not exercise any voting rights in respect of such shares until otherwise determined by the AXIS board of directors. AXIS will notify any shareholder whose voting power is reduced prior to the AXIS special general meeting.
Abstentions and, if applicable, “broker non-votes” will be counted toward the presence of a quorum at the AXIS special general meeting, but will not be considered votes cast on any proposal brought before the AXIS special general meeting. Because the vote required to approve the proposals to be voted upon at the AXIS special general meeting is the affirmative vote of the specified required percentage of the votes cast assuming a quorum is present, an abstention or, if applicable, a “broker non-vote” with respect to any proposal to be voted on at the AXIS special general meeting will not have the effect of a vote for or against the relevant proposal, but will reduce the number of votes cast and therefore increase the relative influence of those shareholders voting.
Revocation of Proxies
At any time prior to their being voted at the AXIS special general meeting, proxies are revocable by written notice to the Secretary of AXIS, by a duly executed proxy bearing a later date or by voting in person at the AXIS special general meeting.
In this proposal, AXIS is asking its shareholders to approve amending the AXIS bye-laws by inserting the words “(including for the purposes of Section 106(4A) of the Act)” after the first mention of the word “business” in bye-law 38 (Quorum for general meetings) and after the word “meeting” in subparagraph (1) of bye-law 43 (Voting at meetings).
The AXIS bye-laws do not currently provide for the required vote and quorum at a general meeting of shareholders to consider an amalgamation or merger of AXIS with another company. The Companies Act, however, does permit a company’s bye-laws to provide for the required vote and quorum at a general meeting of shareholders to consider an amalgamation or merger and, in the absence thereof, the required vote and quorum under the Companies Act requires the resolution of the shareholders must be approved by the affirmative vote of 75% of those voting at the general meeting, the quorum for which is two persons at least holding or representing by proxy more than one-third of the issued shares of the company.
Under this proposal, the amendment to the AXIS bye-laws would result in the required vote and quorum at a general meeting of shareholders to consider an amalgamation or merger of AXIS with another company being aligned with the existing required vote and quorum for a resolution of the shareholders currently provided for in AXIS’ bye-laws. Accordingly, in this proposal AXIS is asking its shareholders to approve amending the AXIS bye-laws to provide that an amalgamation or merger of AXIS with another company requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at an AXIS general meeting, at which the quorum required is two or more persons present in person and representing in person or by proxy shares representing more than 50% of the aggregate voting power of all AXIS shares. The AXIS board of directors unanimously determined that the bye-law amendment is advisable to and in the best interests of AXIS, authorized and approved the bye-law amendment, and resolved that the bye-law amendment proposal be submitted to AXIS shareholders for their consideration at the AXIS special general meeting.
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of AXIS common shares at the AXIS special general meeting, at which a quorum is present in accordance with AXIS’ bye-laws, is required to approve the bye-law amendment proposal, which will become effective immediately if so approved. Approval of the bye-law amendment proposal IS NOT a condition to the consummation of the amalgamation.
The AXIS board of directors unanimously recommends a
vote “FOR” this Proposal 1 to approve the bye-law amendment.
In this proposal, AXIS is asking its shareholders to approve and adopt the amalgamation agreement, the statutory amalgamation agreement and the amalgamation. Approval of this proposal IS a condition to consummation of the amalgamation.
The AXIS board of directors unanimously (1) determined that the amalgamation, on the terms and conditions set forth in the amalgamation agreement, is fair to, and in the best interests of, AXIS, (2) approved the amalgamation agreement, the statutory amalgamation agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby and (3) resolved that the amalgamation proposal be submitted to the AXIS shareholders for their consideration at the special general meeting.
Each AXIS share, including the AXIS preferred shares, as of the record date will carry the right to vote on this proposal. If the bye-law amendment is approved, the approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the AXIS special general meeting, at which a quorum is present, in accordance with AXIS’ amended bye-laws. If the bye-law amendment is not approved, then in accordance with the Companies Act, the approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of 75% of the votes cast of AXIS shares at the AXIS special general meeting, at which a quorum is present.
The AXIS board of directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR”
this Proposal 2 to approve and adopt the amalgamation proposal.
AXIS is providing its shareholders with the opportunity to cast an advisory (nonbinding) vote to approve the “golden parachute” compensation payments that will or may be made by AXIS to its named executive officers in connection with the amalgamation, as required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and Rule 14a-21(c) under the Exchange Act. This proposal, commonly known as “say-on-golden parachute” and which is referred to in this joint proxy statement/prospectus as the “golden parachute” compensation proposal, gives AXIS shareholders the opportunity to vote on an advisory (nonbinding) basis on the “golden parachute” compensation payments that will or may be paid by AXIS to its named executive officers in connection with the amalgamation.
The “golden parachute” compensation that AXIS’ named executive officers may be entitled to receive from AXIS in connection with the amalgamation is summarized in the table entitled “Golden Parachute Compensation,” which can be found in the section titled “The Amalgamation— Interests of AXIS’ Directors and Executive Officers in the Amalgamation” of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Such summary, in table form, includes all compensation and benefits that may or will be paid by AXIS to its named executive officers in connection with the amalgamation.
The AXIS board of directors encourages you to review carefully the “golden parachute” compensation information disclosed in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
The AXIS board of directors unanimously recommends that the shareholders of AXIS approve the following resolution:
“RESOLVED, that the shareholders of AXIS approve, on an advisory (nonbinding) basis, the compensation that will or may become payable by AXIS to its named executive officers in connection with the amalgamation, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402(t) of Regulation S-K in the Golden Parachute Compensation table and the related narrative disclosures.”
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast, by the holders of AXIS common shares at the AXIS special general meeting, at which a quorum is present in accordance with AXIS’ bye-laws, is required to approve this compensation advisory proposal.
The vote on the “golden parachute” compensation proposal is a vote separate and apart from the vote on the adoption of the amalgamation agreement. Since the vote on the “golden parachute” compensation proposal is advisory only, it will not be binding on either AXIS or PartnerRe. Accordingly, if the amalgamation agreement is adopted and the amalgamation is completed, the compensation payments that are contractually required to be paid by AXIS to its named executive officers will or may be paid, subject only to the conditions applicable thereto, regardless of the outcome of the advisory (nonbinding) vote of AXIS shareholders.
The AXIS board of directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR”
this Proposal 3 to approve the compensation advisory proposal.
The AXIS special general meeting may be adjourned to another time or place, if necessary or appropriate, to permit, among other things, further solicitation of proxies if necessary to obtain additional votes in favor of the amalgamation proposal.
If, at the AXIS special general meeting, the number of AXIS common and preferred shares present or represented and voting in favor of the amalgamation proposal is insufficient to approve such proposal, AXIS intends to move to adjourn the special general meeting in order to solicit additional proxies for the adoption and approval of the amalgamation agreement, the statutory amalgamation agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby. AXIS does not intend to call a vote on this proposal if the amalgamation proposal has been approved at the AXIS special general meeting.
In this proposal, AXIS is asking its shareholders to authorize the holder of any proxy solicited by the AXIS board of directors to vote in favor of granting discretionary authority to proxy holders, and each of them individually, to adjourn the AXIS special general meeting to another time and place for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies. If AXIS shareholders approve this adjournment proposal, AXIS could adjourn the AXIS special general meeting and use the additional time to solicit additional proxies, including the solicitation of proxies from AXIS shareholders who have previously voted.
Each AXIS share, including the AXIS preferred shares, as of the record date will carry the right to vote on this proposal. The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the AXIS special general meeting, at which a quorum is present in accordance with AXIS’ bye-laws, is required to approve the adjournment proposal.
The AXIS board of directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR”
this Proposal 4 to approve the adjournment proposal.
The following is a summary of the material differences between the current rights of PartnerRe shareholders, AXIS shareholders and the proposed rights of Newco shareholders. This summary is not intended to be complete and is qualified, except where otherwise provided, by reference to PartnerRe’s memorandum of association and bye-laws, AXIS’ memorandum of association and bye-laws and Newco’s memorandum of association and bye-laws as well as the laws of Bermuda. Copies of these governing corporate instruments are available, without charge, to any person, including to any beneficial owner to whom this joint proxy statement/prospectus is delivered, by following the instructions listed under the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus titled “Where You Can Find More Information.”
PartnerRe has an authorized share capital of 200,000,000 shares, consisting of 165,850,000 common shares, par value $1.00 per share, and 34,150,000 preferred shares, par value $1.00 per share (consisting of 9,200,000 Series D Preferred Shares, 14,950,000 Series E Preferred Shares and 10,000,000 Series F Preferred Shares). As of March 6, 2015, PartnerRe’s issued and outstanding share capital consisted of 87,305,989 PartnerRe common shares and 34,150,000 PartnerRe preferred shares. Additionally, as of [●], 2015, 8,305,989 PartnerRe’s common shares were reserved for issuance under PartnerRe’s equity plans. Upon the exercise of all of PartnerRe’s outstanding options, there would be [●] issued and outstanding PartnerRe common shares, and [●] issued and outstanding PartnerRe preferred shares. PartnerRe common shares and the PartnerRe preferred shares trade on the NYSE.
AXIS has an authorized share capital of 800,000,000 shares par value $0.0125 per share. As of March 6, 2015, AXIS’ issued and outstanding share capital consisted of 100,936,535 AXIS common shares and 25,028,430 AXIS preferred shares (consisting of 28,430 7.50% Series B Preferred Shares, 16,000,000 6.875% Series C Preferred Shares and 9,000,000 5.50% Series D Preferred Shares). Additionally, as of March 6, 2015, 5,574,620 AXIS common shares were reserved for issuance under AXIS’ equity plans. AXIS’ common shares and the AXIS Series C and D Preferred shares trade on the NYSE.
As of the effective time Newco will have an authorized share capital consisting of [●] common shares, par value $0.0125 per share, [●] preferred shares par value US$0.0125 per share, [●] preferred shares par value $1.00 per share (which we refer to as the “Newco preferred shares”) and [●] undesignated shares par value [$0.0125] per share that the Newco board of directors is authorized to issue on such terms and conditions as it may determine. As of the effective time, Newco’s issued and outstanding share capital will consist of [●] Newco common shares, [34,150,000] preferred shares, par value $[1.00] per share (consisting of 9,200,000 6.50% Series D Cumulative Preferred Shares, 14,950,000 7.25% Series E Cumulative Preferred Shares and 10,000,000 5.875% Series F Non-Cumulative Preferred Shares) and 25,028,430 preferred shares, par value $0.0125 per share (consisting of 28,430 7.5% Series B Preferred Shares, 16,000,000 6.875% Series C Preferred Shares and 9,000,000 5.50% Series D Preferred Shares). In addition, as of the effective time, Newco will grant options, restricted share award, share appreciation right and other share-based awards convertible into an aggregate of [●] Newco common shares. Newco common shares will trade on the NYSE.
Shareholders’ Equity
Under Bermuda law, the excess of any consideration paid on the issue of shares over the aggregate par value of such shares must (except in certain limited circumstances) be credited to a share premium account. Share premium may be distributed in certain limited circumstances, for example, to pay up unissued shares which may be distributed to shareholders in proportion to their holdings as fully paid bonus shares, but is otherwise subject to limitation, and cannot be paid to shareholders.
A Bermuda company may also create a contributed surplus account and may credit to such account any cash and other property paid or transferred to the company as sole beneficial owner (other than in connection with the issuance of shares, except in certain limited circumstances). Contributed surplus includes proceeds arising from donated shares, credits resulting from the redemption or conversion of shares at less than the amount set up as nominal capital and donations of cash and other assets to the company. The amount standing to the credit of a company’s contributed surplus account may be distributed to shareholders, subject to the company meeting the solvency and net asset tests set out in the Companies Act. As of [●], 2015, PartnerRe had paid in nominal share capital of $[●] and a share premium account of $[●]and AXIS had paid in nominal share capital of $[●] and a share premium account of $[●].
The comparison of shareholders rights below is subject to such preferred, deferred, qualified or other special rights or such restrictions, whether in regard to dividend, return of capital or otherwise of the holders of preferred shares in each of PartnerRe and AXIS as set out in the relevant certificate of designation, preference and rights or equivalent respect of such preferred shares (which we refer to as “Preferred Share Certificates”). Such Preferred Share Certificates are attached hereto at Exhibits 4.2 through 4.7 and 4.10 through 4.12. For the avoidance of doubt, without prejudice to dissenters’ rights, at the effective time each PartnerRe preferred share and each AXIS preferred share issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time will continue as a preferred share of the amalgamated company and will be entitled to the same dividend and other relative rights, preferences, limitations and restrictions as are now provided by the respective certificate of designation, preferences and rights of such PartnerRe preferred shares or AXIS preferred shares, respectively.
PartnerRe | AXIS | Newco |
Organizational Documents |
The organizational documents of PartnerRe are its memorandum of association and PartnerRe’s bye-laws. | The organizational documents of AXIS are its memorandum of association and AXIS’ bye-laws. | The organizational documents of Newco are its memorandum of association and Newco’s bye-laws. |
“Blank Check” Preferred Shares |
PartnerRe’s board of directors is authorized, subject to certain limitations prescribed by law, to issue preferred shares from time to time in one or more series. Such shares may be issued with or have attached thereto such preferred, deferred, qualified or other special rights or such restrictions, whether in regard to dividend, voting, return of capital or otherwise as the PartnerRe board of directors may determine. Subject to the Companies Act, any preferred shares may, with the approval of the board of directors, be issued on terms: (i) that they are to be redeemed on the happening of a specified event or on a given date; and/or, (ii) that they are liable to be redeemed at the option of PartnerRe; and/or, if authorised by the memorandum of association of PartnerRe, that they are liable to be redeemed at the option of the holder. | The AXIS board of directors has the power, subject to any restrictions in the AXIS bye-laws and without prejudice to any special rights previously conferred on the holders of any existing shares or class or series of shares, to issue any unissued shares of AXIS on such terms and conditions as it may determine and any shares or class or series of shares may be issued with such preferred, deferred or other special rights or such restrictions, whether in regard to dividend, voting, return of capital or otherwise as the AXIS board of directors may determine. Subject to the Companies Act any preferred shares may be issued or converted into shares that, at a determinable date or at the option of AXIS, are liable to be redeemed on such terms and in such manner as AXIS before the issue or conversion may by resolution of the AXIS shareholders determine. | The Newco board of directors is authorised to provide for the issuance of any preference shares in one or more series, and to establish from time to time the number of shares to be included in each such series, and to fix the terms, including designation, powers, preferences, rights, qualifications, limitations and restrictions of the shares of each such series. Subject to the Companies Act, any preference shares may be issued or converted into shares that (at a determinable date or at the option of Newco or the holder) are liable to be redeemed on such terms and in such manner as may be determined by the Newco board of directors (before the issue or conversion). |
Number of Directors |
Subject to “Board Classification/Term” below, the | Subject to “Board Classification/Term” below, the AXIS | Subject to “Board Classification/Term” below, and |
PartnerRe | AXIS | Newco |
PartnerRe board of directors shall consist of such number of directors as may be determined by a resolution of the PartnerRe shareholders such number being not less than three. | board of directors shall consist of not less than nine and not more than 16 AXIS directors (as determined by resolution of the AXIS board of directors) or such number as the AXIS shareholders may from time to time determine. | the rights of the holders of any class or series of Newco preferred shares then issued and outstanding, the Newco board of directors shall consist of such number of directors being not less than 5 directors and not more than 18 directors as the Newco board of directors may from time to time determine. |
Board Classification/Term |
The PartnerRe board of directors is divided into three classes (designated as class I, class II or class III Directors), with the term of the office of one class expiring in each year. Each class consists, as nearly as possible, of one-third of the total number of directors constituting the entire PartnerRe board of directors. Each class shall have a minimum number of one director and a maximum number of four directors. Each class I, II and III directors shall retire on rotation at the conclusion of the third annual general meeting following their election or re-election or until re-elected or his successor is appointed. | The AXIS board of directors is divided by the AXIS board of directors into three classes, designated Class I, Class II and Class III. Each class shall consist as nearly as possible to one-third of the total number of AXIS directors constituting the entire AXIS board of directors. Each AXIS director shall serve for a term ending on the date of the third annual general meeting of shareholders next following the annual general meeting at which such AXIS director was elected. Each director shall hold office until such director’s successor shall have been duly elected and qualified or until they are removed from office by the Members or their office is otherwise vacated. In the event of any change in the number of directors, the AXIS board of directors shall apportion any newly created directorships among, or reduce the number of directorships in, such class or classes as shall equalize, as nearly as possible, the number of directors in each class. In no event will a decrease in the number of directors shorten the term of any incumbent Director. | The Newco board of directors shall be divided into three classes, designated Class I, Class II and Class III. Each director shall serve for a term ending on the date of the third annual general meeting next following the annual general meeting at which such director was elected, provided, that directors initially designated as Class III directors shall serve for an initial term ending on the date of the first annual general meeting next following the effectiveness of their designation as Class III directors, directors initially designated as Class II directors shall serve for an initial term ending on the date of the second annual general meeting next following the effectiveness of their designation as Class II directors and directors initially designated as Class I directors shall serve for an initial term ending on the date of the third annual general meeting next following the effectiveness of their designation as Class I directors. If the number of directors is changed, any increase or decrease shall be apportioned among the classes so as to maintain the number of directors in each class as nearly equal as possible, and any director of any class elected to fill a vacancy shall hold office for a term that shall coincide with the remaining term of the other directors of that class, but in no case shall a decrease in the |
PartnerRe | AXIS | Newco |
| | number of directors shorten the term of any director then in office. A director shall hold office until the annual general meeting for the year in which their term expires, subject to their office being vacated pursuant to the Newco bye-laws. |
Alternate Directors Under the Companies Act, any person may be appointed an alternate director by or in accordance with a resolution of the shareholders or by a director in such manner as may be provided in the bye-laws. |
The PartnerRe bye-laws provide for alternate directors. PartnerRe’s bye-laws provide that a director may appoint an alternate director by written notice to the company secretary. | The AXIS bye-laws do not provide for alternate directors. | Newco’s bye-laws do not provide for alternate directors. |
Removal of Directors |
The PartnerRe shareholders may in a special general meeting called for that purpose remove a director, provided notice of any such meeting shall be served upon the director concerned not less than fourteen (14) days before the meeting and he shall be entitled to be heard at that meeting. | The AXIS shareholders may, at any annual general meeting convened and held in accordance with the AXIS bye-laws, remove an AXIS director only for cause (being wilful misconduct, fraud, gross negligence, embezzlement or any criminal conduct) by affirmative vote of the AXIS shareholders holding at least a majority of the total combined voting power of all of the issued and outstanding shares of AXIS after giving effect to any reduction in voting power as required under the AXIS bye-laws (see “Adjustment of Voting Power and Ownership Limitations”), provided notice of any such meeting shall be served upon the director concerned not less than fourteen (14) days before the meeting and he shall be entitled to be heard at that meeting. | The Newco shareholders may, at any special general meeting convened and held in accordance with the Newco bye-laws, remove a Newco director only with cause (meaning wilful misconduct, fraud, gross negligence, embezzlement or a conviction for a criminal offence involving either dishonesty or engaging in conduct which brings the director or Newco into disrepute or which results in material financial detriment to Newco), provided notice of any such meeting shall be served upon the director concerned not less than fourteen (14) days before the meeting and he shall be entitled to be heard at that meeting. |
PartnerRe | AXIS | Newco |
Board Vacancies |
The office of director shall be vacated upon the happening of any of the following events: (i) resigns his office by notice in writing; (ii) does not stand for re-election upon expiration of his term; (iii) becomes of unsound mind; (iv) becomes bankrupt under the laws of any country or compounds with his creditors; (v) is prohibited by law from being a director; (vi) if the director ceases to be a director by virtue of the Companies Act or the PartnerRe bye-laws or is removed from office in accordance with the PartnerRe bye-laws. Any one or more vacancies in the PartnerRe board of directors (whether arising as a result of an increase in the size of the PartnerRe board of directors or any director vacating his office) shall be deemed casual vacancies for the purposes of the bye-laws. The PartnerRe board of directors, so long as a quorum of PartnerRe directors remains in office, shall have the power at any time and from time to time to appoint any individual to be a director so as to fill a casual vacancy. | The office of a director shall be vacated if the AXIS director: (i) is removed from office pursuant to the AXIS bye-laws or is prohibited from being a director by law; (ii) is or becomes bankrupt or makes any arrangement or composition with his creditors generally; (iii) is or becomes disqualified, of unsound mind or dies; or (iv) resigns his or her office by notice in writing to AXIS. Under the AXIS bye-laws the AXIS board of directors has the power from time to time and at any time to appoint any person as an AXIS director to fill a vacancy on the AXIS board of directors occurring as a result of the death, disability, disqualification or resignation of any AXIS director or from an increase in the size of the AXIS board of directors pursuant to the AXIS bye-laws. A vacancy created by the removal of an AXIS director at an annual general meeting may be filled by the shareholders at such annual general meeting, and, in the absence of such appointment, the AXIS board of directors has the power to fill such vacancy. The AXIS board also has the power from time to time to fill any vacancy left unfilled at a general meeting. | The provisions relating to board vacancies under the Newco bye-laws are broadly similar to the corresponding provisions under the AXIS bye-laws. |
Quorum of the Board |
A quorum of the PartnerRe board of directors for the transaction of business may be fixed by the PartnerRe board of directors and unless so fixed shall be two directors. | The quorum of the AXIS board of directors shall be a majority of the AXIS directors then in office present in person or represented by a duly authorized representative provided that at least two AXIS directors are present in person. | The quorum necessary for the transaction of business at a Newco board of directors meeting shall be two directors, provided that if there is only one director for the time being in office the quorum shall be one. |
PartnerRe | AXIS | Newco |
| | |
Action of the Board |
Any resolution put to vote at a meeting of the PartnerRe board of directors shall be approved by a majority of the votes cast at a meeting at which a quorum is present and in the case of an equality of votes the resolution shall be deemed lost. | The provisions relating to approval threshold for any action of the board under the AXIS bye-laws are broadly similar to the corresponding provisions under the PartnerRe bye-laws. | The provisions relating to approval threshold for any action of the board under the Newco bye-laws are broadly similar to the corresponding provisions under the AXIS bye-laws except the removal of Jean-Paul Montupet as chairman of the Newco board of directors and Albert Benchimol as president and Chief Executive Officer of Newco prior to the third anniversary of the consummation of the amalgamation requires a resolution of the Newco board of directors including the affirmative vote of 75% of the directors then in office excluding the vote of any director who is an officer (other than the office of director of Newco) or employee of Newco or who is directly or indirectly interested in the proposed resolution. |
Action by Written Consent of the Board |
Under PartnerRe bye-laws a resolution in writing signed by all the directors being entitled to receive notice of a meeting of the PartnerRe board of directors (or by an alternate director, as provided for in the PartnerRe bye-laws) shall be as valid and effectual as if passed at a board meeting. | Under the AXIS bye-laws a resolution in writing signed by all the AXIS directors shall be as valid as if it had been passed at a meeting of the AXIS board duly called and constituted, such resolution be effective on the date on which the last AXIS director signs the resolution. | The provisions relating to action by written consent of the board are the same under the Newco bye-laws as the corresponding provisions under the AXIS bye-laws. |
Calling of Board Meetings |
Notice of a meeting of the PartnerRe board of directors may be given by a director, or the secretary on the requisition of a director by word of mouth or in any manner permitted by the PartnerRe bye-laws. | Notice of a meeting of the AXIS board of directors may be given by the chairman of the AXIS board of directors or the chairman of the AXIS board of directors on the requisition of a majority of the AXIS directors then in office. Notice of a meeting of the AXIS board of directors shall be given to an AXIS director if it is given to an AXIS director verbally in person or by telephone or otherwise communicated or sent to such AXIS director by post, telecopier, facsimile, email or other mode of representing words in a legible and non-transitory form at such AXIS director’s last known address or any other address given by such AXIS director to AXIS for this purpose. | Notice of a meeting of the Newco board of directors may be given by a director or the secretary on the requisition of a director. Notice of a Newco board of directors meeting shall be given to a director in the same manner as provided in the AXIS bye-laws. |
Telecommunication of Board Meetings |
PartnerRe’s directors may participate in any meeting of the PartnerRe board of directors by means of such telephone, electronic or other communication facilities as permit all persons participating in the meeting to communicate with each other simultaneously and instantaneously and participation in such a meeting shall constitute presence in person at such meeting. Such meeting shall be deemed to take place where the largest group of those PartnerRe directors participating in the meeting is physically assembled, or, if there is no such group, where the chairman of the meeting then is. | AXIS directors may participate in any meeting of the AXIS board of directors by telephone, electronic or other communication facilities as permit all persons participating in the meeting to communicate with each other simultaneously and instantaneously, and participation in such a meeting shall constitute presence in person at such meeting. | The provisions relating to participation in board meetings under the Newco bye-laws are broadly similar to the corresponding provisions under the PartnerRe bye-laws; provided, however, that in the sole discretion of the directors participating in any meeting of the Newco board of directors from Bermuda, a director participating in such meeting from a jurisdiction outside Bermuda may be prohibited from voting or taking certain other actions at any such meeting if, because of such director’s location in a jurisdiction outside Bermuda, such director’s vote or actions might result in any adverse tax, regulatory or legal consequences to Newco, any of its subsidiaries or any Newco shareholder or its affiliates. |
Duties of Directors and Director Liability |
The Companies Act provides that the business of a company is to be managed and conducted by the board of directors. There is no statutory prescription in Bermuda setting out all of the duties of directors of Bermuda companies. A company’s memorandum of association and bye-laws, together with the Companies Act and relevant case-law at common law, describe the scope of the directors’ powers and duties. |
At common law a director owes two types of duty to the company under Bermuda law: a fiduciary duty and a duty of skill and care. A director’s fiduciary duty has four main elements: (i) a duty to act in good faith in the best interests of the company; (ii) a duty to exercise powers for a proper purpose; (iii) a duty to avoid a conflict of interest; and (iv) a duty not to make a secret profit from opportunities that arise from the office of director of the company. |
Under the Companies Act, every director in exercising his powers and discharging his duties shall: (a) act honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the company; (b) exercise the care, diligence and skill that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in comparable circumstances; and (c) disclose material conflicts of interest to the board of directors of the company at the first opportunity. In addition, the Companies Act imposes various duties on directors and officers of a company with respect to certain matters of management and administration of the company. |
The Companies Act provides that in any proceedings for negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust against any officer, if it appears to a court that such officer is or may be liable in respect of the negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust, but that he or she has acted honestly and reasonably, and that, having regard to all the circumstances of the case, including those connected with his or her appointment, he or she ought fairly to be excused for the negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust, that court may relieve him or her, either wholly or partly, from any liability on such terms as the court may think fit. This provision has been interpreted to apply only to actions brought by or on behalf of the company against such officers. |
Indemnification |
Under Bermuda law, a company is permitted to indemnify any officer or director, out of the funds of the company against (i) any liability incurred by him or her in defending any proceedings, whether civil or criminal, in which judgment is given in his or her favor, or in which he or she is acquitted, or in connection with any application under relevant Bermuda legislation in which relief from liability is granted to him or her by the court and (ii) any loss or liability resulting from negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust, save for his or her fraud and dishonesty. A company may also purchase and maintain insurance for the benefit of any officer of the company against any liability incurred by him under the Companies Act in his capacity as an officer of the company or indemnifying such an officer in respect of any loss arising or liability attaching to him by virtue of any rule of law in respect of any negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust of which the officer may be guilty in relation to the company. Nothing in the Companies Act shall make such policy | The AXIS bye-laws provide that the AXIS directors, the AXIS secretary and other AXIS officers (such term to include any person appointed to any committee by the AXIS board of directors) for the time being acting in relation to any of the affairs of AXIS and the liquidators or trustees (if any) for the time being acting in relation to any of the affairs of AXIS and every one of them and their heirs, executors and administrators shall be indemnified and secured harmless out of the assets of AXIS from and against all actions, costs, charges, losses, damages and expenses which they or any of them, their heirs administrators, shall or may incur or sustain by or by reason of any act done, concurred in or omitted in or about the execution of their duty or supposed duty, or in their respective offices or trusts, and none of them shall be answerable for the acts, receipts, neglects or defaults of any other such person or for joining in any receipts for the sake of conformity, or for any bankers or other persons with whom any moneys or effects belonging to AXIS shall or may be lodged or deposited for safe custody or for insufficiency or | The provisions relating to indemnification under the Newco bye-laws are broadly similar to the corresponding provisions under the AXIS bye-laws except the indemnification is extended to directors, resident representative, secretary and other officers acting in relation to any of the affairs of Newco or any subsidiary. |
PartnerRe | AXIS | Newco |
void or voidable. The PartnerRe bye-laws provide that an “Indemnified Person” (being any director, officer, resident representative, member of a committee duly constituted under the PartnerRe bye-laws and any liquidator or manager for the time being acting in relation to the affairs of PartnerRe, and his heirs, executors and administrators) shall be indemnified against all liabilities, loss, damage or expense incurred by him or suffered by him by or by reason of any act done, conceived in or omitted in the conduct of PartnerRe’s business or in the discharge of his duties and the indemnity contained in the PartnerRe bye-laws shall extend to any Indemnified Person acting in any office or trust in the reasonable belief that he has been appointed or elected to such office or trust notwithstanding any defect in such appointment or election, provided always that the indemnity would not extend to any matter which would render it void pursuant to the Companies Act. Every Indemnified Person shall be indemnified out of the assets of PartnerRe against all liabilities incurred by him by or by reason of any act done, conceived in or omitted in the conduct of PartnerRe’s business or in the discharge of his duties in defending any proceedings, whether civil or criminal, in which judgment is given in his favour, in which he is acquitted, which is settled compromised or abandoned, or in connection with any application under the Companies Act in which relief from liability is granted to him by the court. | deficiency of any security upon which any moneys of or belonging to the AXIS shall be placed out on or invested, or for any other loss, misfortune or damage which may happen in the execution of their respective offices or trusts, or in relation thereto, provided that the indemnity does not extend to any matter in which any of the said persons is found in final judgment or decree not subject to appeal, to have committed fraud or dishonesty. | |
Advancement of Expenses |
PartnerRe’s bye-laws provide that expenses incurred in defending any civil or criminal action or proceeding for which indemnification is required pursuant to the PartnerRe bye-laws shall be paid by PartnerRe in advance of the final disposition of such action | The AXIS bye-laws provide that monies may be advanced to the AXIS directors, the AXIS secretary and other AXIS officers (such term to include any person appointed to any committee by the AXIS board of directors) for the costs, charges and | The provisions relating to advancement of expenses under the Newco bye-laws are broadly similar to the corresponding provisions under the AXIS bye-laws. |
PartnerRe | AXIS | Newco |
or proceeding upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of the Indemnified Person (as defined above) to repay such amount if any allegation of fraud or dishonesty is proved (after the exhaustion of all rights of appeal) against such Indemnified Person. | expenses incurred by them in defending any civil or criminal proceedings against them, on condition that any person to who such monies are advanced shall repay the advance if any allegation of fraud or dishonesty is proved against such person. | |
Shareholder’s and Derivative Suits |
The Bermuda courts generally follow English law precedent, which permits a shareholder action in the name of the company to remedy a wrong done to the company: (i) where the act complained of is alleged to be beyond the corporate power of the company or illegal or would result in the violation of company’s memorandum of association or bye-laws; (ii) where the acts are alleged to constitute a fraud against the minority shareholders; (iii) where the act requires approval by a greater percentage of the company’s shareholders than actually approved it; or (iv) where a power vested in the board of directors has been exercised for an improper purpose. |
When the affairs of a company are being conducted in a manner which is oppressive or prejudicial to the interests of some part of the shareholders, one or more shareholders may apply to the Bermuda Court, which may make such order as it sees fit, including an order regulating the conduct of the company’s affairs in the future or ordering the purchase of the shares of any shareholders by other shareholders or by the company. |
Each PartnerRe shareholder agrees to waive any claim or right of action he or it may at any time have, whether individually or by or in the right of PartnerRe, against any Indemnified Person (as such term is defined above) on account of any action taken by such Indemnified Person or the failure of such Indemnified Person to take action in the performance of his duties with or for PartnerRe, provided, however, that such waiver shall not apply to any claims or rights of action arising out of the fraud or dishonesty of such Indemnified Person or to recover any gain, personal profit or advantage to which such Indemnified Person is not legally entitled. | Similar to the PartnerRe bye-laws, under the AXIS bye-laws each AXIS shareholder agrees to waive any claim or right of action such AXIS shareholder might have, whether individually or by or in the right of AXIS, against any AXIS director or officer on account of any action taken by such AXIS director of officer, or the failure of such AXIS director or officer to take any action, in the performance of his duties with or from AXIS, provided that such waiver shall not extend to any matter in respect of any fraud or dishonest which may attach to such AXIS director or officer. | The provisions relating to shareholder waiver of claim or action under the Newco bye-laws are the same as the corresponding provisions under the AXIS bye-laws |
Annual Meeting |
Unless waived in accordance with the Companies Act, an annual general meeting is required under Bermuda law and under a company’s bye-laws. Under PartnerRe’s bye-laws, the PartnerRe board of directors shall convene and PartnerRe shall hold general meetings as annual general meetings in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act at such time and place as the PartnerRe board of directors may appoint. | An annual general meeting of AXIS shall be held in each year at such time and place as the AXIS chairman or the AXIS president, or any two AXIS directors or any AXIS director and AXIS secretary or the AXIS board of directors shall appoint. | Subject to an election made by Newco in accordance with the Companies Act to dispense with the holding of annual general meetings, an annual general meeting shall be held in each year at such time and place as the chairman of the Newco board of directors or the Newco board of directors shall appoint. |
PartnerRe | AXIS | Newco |
Notice of Annual General Meetings |
An annual general meeting shall, notwithstanding that it is called on shorter notice than that specified in the bye-laws, be deemed to have been properly called if it is so agreed by all the shareholders entitled to attend and vote thereat. |
With the exception of notice required in the event the annual general meeting is adjourned (see Adjournment of Meetings below), a PartnerRe annual general meeting shall be called on not less than 30 days’ and not more than 90 days’ in notice writing, exclusive of the day on which it is served or deemed to be served and of the day for which it is given and shall specify the place, date and time of the meeting, and the nature of the business to be considered. | An AXIS annual general meeting shall be called on at least 20 days’ notice. The notice shall specify the date, time, place and state that the election of AXIS directors will take place, and as far as practicable, other business to be conducted at the AXIS annual general meeting. | The provisions relating to notice of annual general meeting under the Newco bye-laws are broadly similar to the corresponding provision under the AXIS bye-laws except the Newco annual general meeting shall be called on at least 21 days’ notice. |
Calling and Notice of Special General Meetings |
The Companies Act requires the board, on the requisition of shareholders holding at the date of deposit of the requisition shares representing 10% or more of the aggregate voting power of the company, to forthwith proceed to convene a special general meeting and the provisions of the Act shall apply. A special general meeting shall, notwithstanding that it is called on shorter notice than that specified in the bye-laws, be deemed to have been properly called if it is so agreed by a majority in number of the shareholders having the right to attend and vote at the meeting, being a majority together holding not less than 95% in nominal value of the shares giving a right to attend and vote thereat. |
With the exception of notice required in the event of an adjourned meeting (see Adjournment of Meetings below), a special general meeting shall be called by not less than seven days’ and not more than 90 days’ in notice writing, exclusive of the day on which it is served or deemed to be served and of the day for which it is given and shall specify the place, date and time of the meeting, and the nature of the business to be considered. | The AXIS chairman or president may convene a special general meeting of AXIS upon not less than 5 days’ notice. Such notice shall state the date, time, place and the general nature of the business to be considered at the meeting. | The Newco chairman or the Newco board of directors may convene a special general meeting of Newco upon not less than 21 days’ notice. Such notice shall state the date, time, place and the general nature of the business to be considered at the meeting. |
PartnerRe | AXIS | Newco |
Quorum of Shareholders |
Save as otherwise provided in PartnerRe’s bye-laws (see below in respect of Adjournment of Meetings), PartnerRe shareholders entitled to vote at any general meeting and present in person or by proxy representing not less than 25% of the shares in the capital of PartnerRe (including fractions of a shares) shall be a quorum for all purposes. | At the commencement of any general meeting of AXIS two or more persons present in person and representing in person or by proxy shares representing more than 50% of the aggregate voting power of AXIS shall form a quorum for the transaction of business, provided that if AXIS shall at any time have only one AXIS shareholder, one AXIS shareholder present in person or by proxy shall form a quorum for the transaction of business at any AXIS general meeting held during such time. | At any general meeting two or more persons present at the start of the meeting and representing in person or by proxy in excess of 50% of the total issued voting shares in Newco shall form a quorum for the transaction of business. |
Adjournment of Meetings |
In accordance with PartnerRe’s bye-laws either: (i) the chairman may adjourn the meeting with the consent of any meeting at which a quorum is present; or (ii) if within five minutes (or such longer time as the chairman of the meeting may determine to wait) after the time appointed for the meeting, a quorum is not present, the meeting: (A) if convened on the requisition of PartnerRe’s shareholders, shall be dissolved; or (B) in all other cases be adjourned to such other day and such other time and place as the chairman of the meeting may determine and at such adjourned meeting one (1) PartnerRe shareholder present in person and entitled to vote shall be a quorum. PartnerRe shall give not less than seven days’ notice of any meeting adjourned through want of a quorum and such notice shall state that the one PartnerRe shareholder present in person or by proxy (whatever the number of Shares held by them) and entitled to vote shall be a quorum. | In accordance with the AXIS bye-laws: (i) if within a reasonable period from the time appointed for the meeting a quorum is not present, the meeting shall stand adjourned to the same day one week later, at the same time and place or to such other day, time or place as the AXIS secretary may determine; or (ii) the chairman of the meeting may, with the consent of the AXIS shareholders at any general meeting at which a quorum is present (and shall if so directed), adjourn the meeting. Unless the meeting is adjourned to a specific date and time, fresh notice of the date, time and place for the resumption of the adjourned meeting shall be given to each AXIS shareholder in accordance with the AXIS bye-laws. | In accordance with the Newco bye-laws, the chairman of a general meeting at which a quorum is present may, with the consent of the Newco shareholders holding a majority of the voting rights of those Newco shareholders present in person or by proxy (and shall if so directed by Newco shareholders holding a majority of the voting rights of those Newco shareholders present in person or by proxy) adjourn the meeting. The chairman of a general meeting may adjourn a meeting to another time and place without the consent or direction of the Newco shareholders if it appears to him that: (a) it is likely to be impractical to hold or continue that meeting because of the number of Newco shareholders wishing to attend who are not present; or (b) the unruly conduct of persons attending the meeting prevents, or is likely to prevent, the orderly continuation of the business of the meeting; or (c) an adjournment is otherwise necessary so that the business of |
PartnerRe | AXIS | Newco |
| | the meeting may be properly conducted. If within half an hour from the time appointed for any general meeting a quorum is not present, then, in the case of a meeting convened on a requisition, the meeting shall be deemed cancelled and, in any other case, the meeting shall stand adjourned to the same day one week later, at the same time and place or to such other day, time or place as the secretary may determine. For a meeting that is adjourned unless the meeting is adjourned to a specific date, time and place announced at the meeting being adjourned, fresh notice of the resumption of the meeting shall be given to each Newco shareholder entitled to attend and vote thereat in accordance with the bye-laws. |
Telecommunication of General Meetings |
Under the PartnerRe bye-laws, a meeting of PartnerRe shareholders (or any class thereof) may be held by means of such telephone, electronic or other communication facilities as permit all persons participating in the meeting to communicate with each other simultaneously and instantaneously, and participation in such a meeting will constitute participation in person at such a meeting. | The situation is broadly similar under the AXIS bye-laws as it is in the PartnerRe bye-laws. | The provisions relating to telecommunications at general meetings under the Newco bye-laws are broadly similar to the corresponding provisions under the AXIS bye-laws. |
Voting at General Meeting |
Save where a greater majority is required by the Companies Act or the PartnerRe bye-laws (please see below “—Approval of Certain Transactions”), any question proposed for consideration at any general meeting shall be decided on by a simple majority of votes cast in all cases determined pursuant to any | Subject to the provisions of the Companies Act and AXIS’ bye-laws, any question proposed for the consideration of the Members at any general meeting shall be decided by the affirmative votes of a majority of the votes cast in accordance with the provisions of AXIS’ bye-laws, subject to any adjustment to voting power | The provisions relating to voting at general meetings under the Newco bye-laws are broadly similar to the corresponding provisions under the AXIS bye-laws. |
PartnerRe | AXIS | Newco |
adjustments in voting power (please see below “—Adjustment of Voting Power and Ownership Limitations”). In the case of an equality of votes the resolution shall fail. | (please see below “—Adjustment of Voting Power and Ownership Limitations”), and in the case of an equality of votes the resolution shall fail. | |
Voting by Show of Hands |
Under PartnerRe’s bye-laws, subject to any rights or restrictions for the time being lawfully attached to any class of shares and subject to the remainder of the PartnerRe bye-laws including any adjustments to voting power of the shares of any PartnerRe shareholder (see “—Approval of Certain Transactions” below and “—Adjustment of Voting Powers and Ownership Limitations”) in the first instance any resolution put to a general meeting shall be decided on a show of hands or by a count of votes received in form of electronic records, unless a poll is demanded (see “—Demand for a Poll” below). | The provisions relating to voting by show of hands under the AXIS bye-laws are broadly similar to the corresponding provisions under the PartnerRe bye-laws. | The provisions relating to voting by show of hands under the Newco bye-laws are broadly similar to the corresponding provisions under the PartnerRe and AXIS bye-laws. |
Demand for a Poll |
The Companies Act provides that notwithstanding the provisions in respect of voting by a show of hands, a poll may be demanded by: (i) the chairman of the meeting; (ii) at least three shareholders present in person or represented by proxy; (iii) any shareholder or shareholders present in person or represented by proxy and holding between them not less than one tenth of the total voting rights of all the shareholders having the right to vote at such meeting; or (iv) a shareholder or shareholders present in person or represented by proxy holding shares conferring the right to vote at such meeting, being shares on which an aggregate sum has been paid-up or credited as paid up equal to not less than one tenth of the total sum paid-up or credited as paid-up on all such shares conferring such right. |
The number of votes subject to the poll are subject to the PartnerRe bye-laws and any adjustments of voting power under the PartnerRe bye-laws (please see “Adjustment of Voting Powers and Ownership Limitations” below). | Like PartnerRe’s bye-laws, the number of votes are subject to any adjustments of voting power under the AXIS bye-laws (please see “Adjustment of Voting Powers and Ownership Limitations”). | Like PartnerRe and Newco’s bye-laws the number of votes are subject to any adjustments of voting power under the Newco bye-laws (please see “Adjustment of Voting Powers and Ownership Limitations”). |
PartnerRe | AXIS | Newco |
Action by Written Resolution of the Shareholders |
The Companies Act provides that subject to a statutory exception (see below) anything which may be done by resolution of the shareholders in general meeting or by resolution of any class of shareholders in a separate general meeting may be done by resolution in writing. The statutory exceptions are that a written resolution may not be used to remove an auditor before his expiration of his term of office or remove a director before the expiration of his term of office. |
Any written resolution of the shareholders shall be signed by such number of PartnerRe shareholders (or holders of such class of PartnerRe shares) as provided in the Companies Act. Such resolution in writing may be signed by the PartnerRe shareholder or its proxy, or in the case of a PartnerRe shareholder that is a corporation by its representative on behalf of such PartnerRe shareholder. The date of the resolution in writing is the date when the resolution in writing is signed by, or on behalf of, the PartnerRe shareholder who establishes the relevant number of votes required for the passing of the resolution in writing and any reference in any enactment to the date of passing of a resolution is, in relation to a resolution in writing a reference to such date. | Any written resolution of the shareholders shall be signed by or on behalf of all the AXIS shareholders who at the date of the resolution would be entitled to attend the meeting and vote on the resolution. A written resolution may be signed in counterparts and the date of the resolution is the date when the resolution is signed by the last AXIS shareholder to sign and any reference in the AXIS bye-laws to the date of passing of a resolution is a reference to such date. | The provisions relating to shareholder written resolutions under Newco’s bye-laws are broadly similar to the corresponding provisions under the AXIS bye-laws. |
Required Vote for Amalgamation |
The Companies Act permits an amalgamation between two or more companies that are registered in Bermuda, or between one or more Bermuda “exempted companies” and one or more bodies incorporated outside of Bermuda. Under Bermuda law, each of PartnerRe, AXIS and Newco is a Bermuda “exempted company.” The Companies Act provides that, unless the bye-laws provide otherwise, a resolution of the shareholders proposing an amalgamation must be approved by a majority vote of three-fourths (i.e., a 75% majority) of those voting at such meeting and the quorum must be two persons at least holding or representing by proxy more than one-third of the issued shares of the company. |
PartnerRe’s bye-laws provide otherwise and states that in addition to the approval of the PartnerRe board of directors, any resolution proposed for consideration at any general meeting to approve the amalgamation of PartnerRe with any other company, wherever incorporated, shall require a simple majority of votes cast at such meeting and the quorum for such meeting shall be that required in the PartnerRe bye-laws and a poll may demanded in respect of such resolution in accordance with the PartnerRe bye-laws. | The AXIS bye-laws are silent on the required vote for amalgamation and, as such, the Companies Act provisions set out above will apply. However, in the event that the bye-law amendment proposal is approved by AXIS shareholders at the AXIS special general meeting, only a simple majority of votes cast at such meeting shall be required to approve the amalgamation and the quorum for such meeting shall be that required for a general meeting in the AXIS bye-laws. | The Newco bye-laws provide that if the Companies Act requires an amalgamation agreement to be submitted to the Newco shareholders then the affirmative vote of a simple majority of votes cast shall be required to approve the amalgamation agreement and the quorum for such meeting shall be that required for a general meeting in the Newco bye-laws. |
PartnerRe | AXIS | Newco |
Shareholder Proposals |
Under the Companies Act, shareholders may, at their own expense (unless the company otherwise resolves) require a company to: (i) give to the shareholder entitled to receive notice of the next annual general meeting notice of any resolution that shareholders can properly propose at that meeting; and/or (ii) circulate to any member entitled to notice of any general meeting a statement (of not more than 1,000 words) in respect of any matter referred to in a proposed resolution or any business to be conducted at that meeting. The number of shareholders necessary for such a request is either the number of shareholders representing not less than one-twentieth of the total voting rights of all the shareholders having at the date of the request a right to vote at the meeting to which the request relates, or not less than 100 shareholders. Notice of any such intended resolution shall be given, and any statement shall be circulated, to shareholders entitled to have notice of the meeting sent to them by serving a copy of the resolution or statement on each such shareholder in any manner permitted for service of notice of the meeting, and notice of any such resolution shall be given to any other shareholder of the company by giving notice of the general effect of the resolution in any matter permitted for giving him/it notice of meetings of the company. |
PartnerRe’s bye-laws provide that proposals of other business to be transacted by the shareholders at an annual general meeting may be made only: (i) pursuant to PartnerRe’s notice of meeting; (ii) by or at the direction of the PartnerRe board of directors or (iii) by any PartnerRe shareholder who is a shareholder of record at the time of giving notice provided for in the PartnerRe bye-laws who shall be entitled to vote at the meeting and who complies with the notice procedures set forth in the PartnerRe bye-laws. The notice requirements are the same as those set out below at “Director Nominations by Shareholders”. Proposals by shareholders of other business to be conducted at a special general meeting may be made in accordance with the provisions summarised at “Calling and Notice of Special General Meetings”. | The AXIS bye-laws do not set out a procedure for shareholder proposals. | Newco bye-laws provide that subject to the Companies Act, proposals for other business at an annual general meeting may be made only (a) pursuant to Newco’s notice of meeting (or any supplement thereto), (b) by or at the direction of the Newco board of directors or any committee thereof or (c) as may be provided in the certificate of designation for any class or series of preferred shares or (d) by any Newco shareholder who is a shareholder of record at the time of giving of notice and at the time of the annual general meeting. The notice requirements are those set out below at “Director Nominations by Shareholders” for a director nomination at an annual general meeting. Proposals by shareholders of other business to be conducted at a special general meeting may be made (a) pursuant to the Newco’s notice of meeting, (b) by or at the direction of the Newco board of directors or any committee thereof (c) as may be provided in the certificate of designation for any class or series of preferred shares or (d) only in the case of a special general meeting requisitioned by any Newco shareholder in compliance with section 74 of the Companies Act (or any successor provision thereto), by the requisitioning Newco shareholder at the giving of advance notice required by the Companies Act. A Newco shareholder’s proposal to transact any business at any requisitioned special general meeting shall comply with the notice requirements set out below at “Director Nominations by Shareholders” for a director nomination at an annual general meeting. |
| Director Nominations by Shareholder | |
PartnerRe’s bye-laws provide that nominations of persons for election to the PartnerRe board of directors may be made at an annual general meeting only: (i) pursuant to PartnerRe’s notice of meeting; (ii) by or at the direction of the PartnerRe board of directors or (iii) by any PartnerRe shareholder who is a shareholder of record at the time of giving notice provided for in the PartnerRe bye-laws who shall be entitled to vote at the meeting and who complies with the notice procedures set forth in the PartnerRe bye-laws. | The AXIS bye-laws do not set out a procedure for a director nomination by a shareholder. | Subject to the Companies Act, nominations of persons for election to Newco board of directors at an annual general meeting may be made only (a) pursuant to Newco’s notice of meeting (or any supplement thereto), (b) by or at the direction of the Newco board of directors or any committee thereof or (c) as may be provided in the certificate of designation for any class or series of preferred shares or (d) by any Newco shareholder who is a member of record at the time of giving of notice and at the time of the annual general meeting, who shall be entitled to vote at the meeting and who complies with the procedures set forth in Newco bye-laws. |
PartnerRe | AXIS | Newco |
For nominations to be properly bought before an annual general meeting or by a PartnerRe shareholder pursuant to paragraph (iii) above, the PartnerRe shareholder must have given timely notice thereto if writing to the PartnerRe secretary. To be timely a notice shall be delivered to, or mailed and received by, the PartnerRe secretary not less than 60 days and not more than 90 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual general meeting, provided, however, that in the event that the date of the annual general meeting is advanced more than 30 days prior to such anniversary or delayed more than 70 days from such anniversary, to be timely the notice must be received by PartnerRe no earlier than 90 days prior to such annual general meeting and no later than 60 days prior to such annual general meeting or the tenth day following the day on which public announcement of the date of the meeting was first made by PartnerRe. | | For nominations to be properly brought before an annual general meeting by a Newco shareholder, the Newco shareholder must deliver notice to the secretary not less than 120 days nor more than 150 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual general meeting; provided, however, that in the event that the date of the annual general meeting is advanced more than 30 days prior to such anniversary date or delayed more than 70 days after such anniversary date then to be timely such notice must be received by Newco no earlier than 120 days prior to such annual meeting and no later than the later of 70 days prior to the date of the meeting or not later than 10 days following the earlier of the date on which notice of the annual general meeting was posted to Members or the day on which public announcement of the date of the annual general meeting was first made by Newco. A Newco shareholder ’s notice to the secretary shall set out such matters as are prescribed by Newco’s bye-laws. To be eligible as a nominee for election as a director, the proposed nominee must provide to the secretary in accordance with the applicable time periods prescribed for delivery of notice under the Newco bye-laws certain information and make certain representation as set out in Newco’s bye-laws. |
PartnerRe | AXIS | Newco |
| | Nominations of persons for election to Newco board of directors at a special general meeting may be made (a) pursuant to the Newco’s notice of meeting, (b) by or at the direction of the Newco board of directors or any committee thereof (c) as may be provided in the certificate of designation for any class or series of preferred shares or (d) only in the case of a special general meeting requisitioned by any Newco shareholder in compliance with section 74 of the Companies Act (or any successor provision thereto), by the requisitioning Newco shareholder at the giving of advance notice required by the Companies Act. A Newco shareholder’s proposal to nominate a director at any requisitioned special general meeting shall comply with the notice requirements set out above in relation to a Newco shareholder’s proposal to nominate a director at an annual general meeting. |
PartnerRe | AXIS | Newco |
Voting Rights and Proxies |
Every PartnerRe shareholder entitled to vote has the right to do so either in person or by one or more persons authorized by a written proxy executed and delivered in accordance with the PartnerRe bye-laws. An instrument of proxy shall be in a common form in writing, executed and delivered in accordance with PartnerRe’s bye-laws. Subject to the Companies Act, the PartnerRe board of directors may at its discretion waive any provisions of the PartnerRe bye-laws related to proxies or authorizations and, in particular, may accept such verbal or other assurances as it thinks fit as to the right of any person to attend , speak and vote on behalf of any PartnerRe shareholder at general meetings or to sign resolutions in writing. Subject to “Adjustment of Voting Power and Ownership Limitations,” PartnerRe’s bye-laws and rights attaching to each class of share, each holder of a PartnerRe common share shall be entitled to vote on a show of hands and entitled on a poll to one vote per comon share held. | The situation is broadly similar to those of PartnerRe under the AXIS bye-laws, save that the AXIS bye-laws do not provide the AXIS board of directors discretion to waive any provisions related to proxies or authorizations contained in the AXIS bye-laws. Subject to “—Adjustment of Voting Power and Ownership Limitations,” AXIS’ bye-laws and rights attaching to each class of share, every AXIS shareholder shall have one vote for each share carrying the right to vote on the matter in question of which he or she is the holder. | A Newco shareholder may appoint a proxy by an instrument appointing a proxy in writing substantially in the form set out in Newco’s bye-laws or such other form as the Newco board of directors may determine from time to time or such telephonic, electronic or other means as may be approved by the Newco board of directors from time to time. Subject to “—Adjustment of Voting Power and Ownership Limitations,” Newco’s bye-laws and rights attaching to each class of share, every Newco shareholder shall have one vote for each share carrying the right to vote on the matter in question of which he is the holder. A Newco shareholder who is the holder of two or more shares may appoint more than one proxy to represent him and vote on his behalf in respect of different shares. |
PartnerRe | AXIS | Newco |
Adjustment of Voting Powers and Ownership Limitations |
The PartnerRe bye-laws contain a provision that can be waived at the PartnerRe board of director’s discretion and on a case by case basis. Such provision provides that no person shall be permitted to: (i) own or control PartnerRe shares in excess of 9.9% of the outstanding PartnerRe shares (determined by value) or (ii) be a Ten Percent Shareholder determined in accordance with the PartnerRe bye-laws. “Own” or “Control” with respect to PartnerRe’s shares means “own” under the rules set forth in section 958 of the United States Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (which we refer to as the “Code”) and “Controlled Shares” of a person means PartnerRe’s shares that would be treated as owned by such person under the rules set forth in section 958 of the Code. “Ten Percent Shareholder” for the purposes of this section means a person who Owns or Controls more than 9.9% of the total combined voting power of all classes of PartnerRe’s shares entitled to vote at a general meeting of PartnerRe’s shareholders or in any other circumstances in which PartnerRe’s shareholders are entitled to vote. If any person would be a Ten Percent Shareholder, notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in the PartnerRe bye-laws, the votes conferred by the Controlled Shares of such person are reduced (and shall automatically be reduced in the future) by whatever amount is necessary so that after any such reduction such person shall not be a Ten Percent Shareholder. In determining the reduction in votes conferred by Controlled Shares pursuant to the PartnerRe bye-laws, the reduction in vote conferred by the Controlled Shares of any person shall be effected proportionately among all the Controlled Shares of such person, provided, however, that if a PartnerRe shareholder owns, or is treated as owning by the application of section 958 of the Code, interests in another PartnerRe shareholder, any reduction in votes conferred by Controlled Shares of such PartnerRe shareholder, any reduction in votes conferred by Controlled Shares of such PartnerRe shareholder (determined solely on the basis of PartnerRe shares held directly by such PartnerRe shareholder and PartnerRe shares attributed to such PartnerRe shareholder) shall be first reduced the votes conferred on the PartnerRe shares held directly by the PartnerRe shareholder that owns directly or through another entity an interest in such PartnerRe shareholder. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the PartnerRe bye-laws, in addition to the above, PartnerRe shares shall not carry rights to vote, or shall have reduced voting rights, to the extent that the PartnerRe board of directors reasonably determines that it is necessary that such shares should not carry the right to vote or should have reduced voting rights in order to avoid non-deminimis adverse tax, legal or regulatory consequences to PartnerRe or any subsidiary of PartnerRe or any PartnerRe shareholder or affiliate of any PartnerRe shareholder, provided that the PartnerRe board shall use reasonable efforts to exercise such discretion equally among similarly situated PartnerRe shareholders. | The AXIS bye-laws contain a provision that the voting power of all shares is adjusted (and shall be automatically adjusted in the future) to the extent necessary so that there is no 9.5% U.S. Shareholder or 9.5% Direct Foreign Shareholder Group (as such capitalized terms are defined in the AXIS bye-laws). The foregoing does not apply in the event that one AXIS shareholder owns greater than 75% of the issued and outstanding shares of AXIS. The AXIS board of directors may deviate from any of the principles set out in the AXIS bye-laws and determine that shares shall carry different voting rights as it determines appropriate (1) to avoid the existence of any 9.5% U.S. Shareholder or (2) to avoid adverse tax, legal or regulatory consequences to AXIS, any of its subsidiaries, or any other shareholder or its affiliates. | The voting power of all Newco shares is adjusted (and shall be automatically adjusted in the future) to the extent necessary so that there is no 9.5% U.S. Member or, in the discretion of the Newco board of directors, no 9.5% Non-U.S Member (as such capitalized terms are defined in Newco’s bye-laws). The foregoing does not apply in the event that one Newco shareholder owns greater than 75% of the voting power of the issued shares of Newco determined without applying the voting power adjustments or eliminations under the bye-laws. The Newco board of directors may deviate from any of the principles described in the bye-laws and determine that shares held by a Newco shareholder shall carry different voting rights as it reasonably determines, based on the advice of counsel, to be appropriate (a) to avoid the existence of any 9.5% U.S. Member or, unless the Newco board of directors determines otherwise, a 9.5% Non-U.S. Member, or (b) to avoid adverse tax, legal or regulatory consequences to Newco, any subsidiary of Newco or any direct or indirect holder of shares. In addition to the above, any Newco shares shall not carry any right to vote to the extent that the Newco board of directors determines in its sole discretion that it is necessary that such shares should not carry the right to vote in order to avoid adverse tax, legal or regulatory consequences to Newco, any subsidiary of Newco, or any other direct or indirect holder of shares, provided, that no adjustment pursuant to the Newco bye-laws shall cause any person to become a 9.5% U.S. Member or, unless the Newco board of directors determines otherwise, a 9.5% Non-U.S. Member. |
PartnerRe | AXIS | Newco |
Record Date |
The PartnerRe board may fix any date as the record date for any dividend, distribution, allotment or issue for the purposes of identifying the persons entitled to receive notices of any general meeting and to vote at any general meeting. Any such record date may be on or at any time before or after any date on which such dividend, distribution, allotment or issue is declared, paid or made or such note is dispatched. | Notwithstanding any other provision of the AXIS bye-laws, the AXIS board of directors may fix any date as the record date for determining the AXIS shareholders entitled to receive: (i) any dividend; and (ii) notice of and to vote at any general meeting of AXIS. | The provisions relating to fixing a record date are the same in Newco and PartnerRe bye-laws |
Amendment of Memorandum of Association |
Under the Companies Act: (i) the holders of an aggregate of not less than 20% in par value of a company’s issued share capital or any class thereof; or (ii) the holders of not less than 20% of the debentures entitled to object to amendments to the memorandum of association have the right to apply to the court for an annulment of any amendment to the memorandum of association adopted by shareholders at any general meeting. This does not apply to an amendment that alters or reduces a company’s share capital as provided in the Companies Act. Upon such application, the alteration will not have effect until it is confirmed by the court. An application for an annulment of an amendment to the memorandum of association must be made within 21 days after the date on which the resolution altering the company’s memorandum of association is passed and may be made on behalf of persons entitled to make the application by one or more of their number as they may appoint in writing for the purpose. No application may be made by shareholders voting in favor of the amendment. |
Under the Companies Act, the resolution of the PartnerRe shareholders at a general meeting of which due notice has been given is required to alter the memorandum of association. | The position is the same for AXIS as it is in respect of PartnerRe. | The bye-laws of Newco provide that the memorandum of association of Newco may be amended by a resolution of the Newco board of directors and a resolution of the shareholders. |
PartnerRe | AXIS | Newco |
Amendment of Bye-Laws |
The PartnerRe bye-laws may only be revoked or amended by the PartnerRe board of directors, but no such revocation or amendment shall be operative unless and until it is subsequently approved by resolution of the PartnerRe shareholders. | No bye-law of the AXIS bye-laws shall be rescinded, altered or amended and no new bye-law shall be made until the same has been approved by a resolution of the AXIS board of directors and the AXIS shareholders. | No Newco bye-law may be rescinded, altered or amended and no new bye-law may be made until the same has been approved by a resolution of the Newco board of directors and by a resolution of the Newco shareholders. |
PartnerRe | AXIS | Newco |
| | Until the third anniversary of the amalgamation, the Newco bye-law relating to the removal of the chairman of the Newco board of directors or the president and chief executive officer of Newco may not be rescinded, altered or amended. No new bye-law may be made which would have the effect of rescinding, altering or amending the provisions of such bye-law, until the same has been approved by a resolution of the Newco board of directors including the affirmative vote of not less than 75% of the directors then in office excluding the vote of any director who is an officer (other than the office of director of Newco) or employee of Newco or who is directly or indirectly interested in the proposed resolution and by a resolution of the Newco shareholders. |
Dividends and Distribution of Contributed Surplus |
In accordance with the Companies Act, a company may pay dividends on its issued and outstanding shares in accordance with the company’s bye-laws and the rights attaching to the company’s shares. Dividends may be declared by a company’s board of directors, out of any funds of the company legally available for the payment of such dividends, subject to any preferred dividend right of any holders of any preferred shares from time to time. Under the Companies Act, a company may not make a dividend or distribution out of contributed surplus unless there were reasonable grounds for believing that: (i) the company is, or would, after the payment, be unable to pay its liabilities as they become due; or (ii) the realizable value of the company’s assets would thereby be less than its liabilities. Subject to the PartnerRe bye-laws and except insofar as the rights attaching to, or the terms of issue of, any | The AXIS board of directors may, subject to the AXIS bye-laws and in accordance with the Companies Act, declare a dividend to be paid to the AXIS shareholders, in proportion to the number of shares held by them, and such dividend may be paid in cash or wholly or partly in specie in which case the AXIS board of directors may fix the value for distribution in specie of any assets. The AXIS board of directors may declare and make such other distributions (in cash or in specie) to the AXIS shareholders as may be lawfully made out of the assets of AXIS. The AXIS board of directors may from time to time before declaring a dividend set aside, out of the surplus or profits of AXIS, such sum as it thinks proper as a reserve to be used to meet contingencies or for equalizing dividends or for any other special purpose. | The provisions relating to dividends and distributions of contributed surplus under Newco’s bye-laws are broadly similar to the corresponding provisions under the AXIS bye-laws. The provisions relating to dividends and distributions of contributed surplus under Newco’s bye-laws are broadly similar to the corresponding provisions under the AXIS bye-laws.. |
PartnerRe | AXIS | Newco |
PartnerRe share otherwise provide, the PartnerRe board of directors may from time to time declare dividends or distributions out of contributed surplus to be paid to the PartnerRe shareholders according to their rights and interests, including such interim dividends as appear to the PartnerRe board of directors to be justified by PartnerRe’s position. The dividend may determine that any dividend shall be paid in cash or shall be satisfied, subject to the PartnerRe bye-laws, in paying up in full PartnerRe shares in PartnerRe to be issued to PartnerRe shareholders credited as fully paid or partly paid or partly in any way and partly the other. | | distribution shall bear interest as against Newco. |
Interested Directors |
Under the Companies Act and at common law, if a director or officer has an interest in a material contract he shall be deemed not to be acting honestly and in good faith (one of the codified directors’ duties under the Companies Act) if he does not declare at the first opportunity the nature of that interest either at a meeting of directors or in writing to the board of directors. |
Under the PartnerRe bye-laws, subject to the provisions of the Companies Act, a director may notwithstanding his office be a party to, or otherwise interested in any transaction or arrangement with PartnerRe or in which PartnerRe is otherwise interested, and be a director or other officer of, or employed by, or a party to a transaction or arrangement with, or otherwise interested in any body corporate promoted by PartnerRe. So long as, where it is necessary, a PartnerRe director declares his interest at the first opportunity at a meeting of the PartnerRe board of directors or by writing to the PartnerRe directors as required by the Companies Act, a PartnerRe directors shall not by reason of his office be accountable to PartnerRe for any benefit which he derives from any office or employment | The provisions relating to interested directors are broadly similar under the AXIS bye-laws to the corresponding provisions under the PartnerRe bye-laws, however, the interested director may only be counted in the quorum for the AXIS board meeting and vote in respect of any contract or proposed contract or arrangement in which such director is interested if not so disqualified by the chairman of the relevant AXIS board of directors meeting. | The provisions relating to interested directors under the Newco bye-laws are broadly similar to the corresponding provisions under the AXIS bye-laws. |
PartnerRe | AXIS | Newco |
to which the PartnerRe bye-laws allow him to be appointed or from any transaction or arrangement in which the PartnerRe bye-laws allow him to be interested, and no such transaction or arrangement shall be liable to be avoided on the ground of any interest or benefit. A PartnerRe director who has disclosed his interest in a transaction or arrangement with PartnerRe, or in which PartnerRe is otherwise interested, may be counted in the quorum and vote at any meeting at which such transaction or arrangement is considered by the PartnerRe board of directors. | | |
Discontinuing |
Under the Companies Act, a company may discontinue out of Bermuda and be continued in a jurisdiction outside of Bermuda approved by the Bermuda Minister of Finance or such other Bermuda Minister as may be appointed to administer the Companies Act as if it had been incorporated under the laws of that other jurisdiction. A company may make specific provisions for discontinuance in its bye-laws, and may delegate authority to the board of directors to exercise all of the company’s powers to discontinue the company. In the absence of such provision, the decision to discontinue the company to another jurisdiction must be made by the shareholders, provided that at any such meeting any such share will carry the right to vote in respect of such discontinuance whether or not it otherwise carries the right to vote. |
The PartnerRe bye-laws are silent on discontinuance and, therefore, the provisions of the Companies Act will apply. | The AXIS bye-laws provide that the AXIS board of directors may exercise all the powers of AXIS to discontinue AXIS to a named country or jurisdiction outside Bermuda pursuant to the Companies Act. | The provisions relating to discontinuation under the Newco bye-laws are broadly similar to the corresponding provisions under the AXIS bye-laws. |
PartnerRe | AXIS | Newco |
| Preemptive Rights | |
Under Bermuda law, no shareholder has a preemptive right to subscribe for additional issues of a company’s shares unless, and to the extent that, the right is expressly granted to the shareholder under the bye-laws of a company or under any contract between the shareholder and the company. The PartnerRe bye-laws do not provide for any pre-emption rights on a transfer or an issue of PartnerRe shares. | The AXIS bye-laws do not provide for any pre-emption rights on a transfer or an issue of AXIS shares. | The provisions relating to preemptive rights under the Newco bye-laws are broadly similar to the corresponding provisions under the AXIS bye-laws. |
Repurchases of Shares |
Under the Companies Act, a company may, if authorized by its memorandum of association or bye-laws repurchase its own shares. |
The PartnerRe bye-laws provide that the PartnerRe board may, at its discretion and without sanction of a resolution of the PartnerRe shareholders, authorize the acquisition of its own shares, of any class, at any price, and any PartnerRe shares to be so purchased may be selected in any manner whatsoever, to be held as treasury shares or otherwise, upon such terms as the PartnerRe board of directors may in its discretion determine, provided that such acquisition is effected in accordance with the Companies Act. The PartnerRe board of directors has the discretion if it reasonably determines that ownership by any PartnerRe shareholder may result in (i) any person being a Ten Percent Shareholder or (ii) any non-de minimis adverse tax, legal or regulatory consequences to PartnerRe or any subsidiary of PartnerRe or any PartnerRe shareholder or affiliate of any PartnerRe shareholder, PartnerRe will have the option but not the obligation to purchase the minimum number of PartnerRe shares held by such PartnerRe shareholder that is | The AXIS bye-laws provide that the AXIS board of directors may exercise all the powers of AXIS to purchase and acquire all or any part of its own shares in accordance with the Companies Act. In addition, the AXIS bye-laws provide that if the AXIS directors in their sole discretion determine that share ownership by any person may result in a non-de minimis adverse tax, legal or regulatory consequence to AXIS, any subsidiary, or any other holder of AXIS shares or its affiliates (including if such consequence arises as a result of any U.S. Person owning Controlled Shares that constitute 9.5% or more of the value of AXIS or the voting shares of AXIS (but subject to the provisions of the AXIS bye-laws as set out under “Adjustment of Voting Powers and Ownership Limitations”), AXIS shall have the option but not the obligation to repurchase or assign to a third-party the right to purchase the minimum number of shares held by such person which is necessary to eliminate such non-de minimis adverse tax, legal or regulatory consequence at a price determined in the good faith discretion of the AXIS directors to represent such shares’ fair market value determined in accordance with the AXIS bye-laws. If an AXIS shareholder disagrees with | The provisions relating to repurchase of shares under Newco bye-laws are broadly similar to the corresponding provisions under the AXIS bye-laws except that a Newco shareholder who disagrees with the repurchase price being offered will have no right of appraisal. |
PartnerRe | AXIS | Newco |
necessary so that after such purchase such person is not a Ten Percent Shareholder (as determined in accordance with the PartnerRe bye-laws). | the price so determined by the AXIS board of directors, the fair market value per share and the liquidity discount, if any, will be determined by an independent appraiser retained by AXIS at its expense and reasonably acceptable to such AXIS shareholder. | |
Restrictions on Transfer |
The PartnerRe board of directors may, in its absolute discretion and without assigning any reason therefor, decline to register any transfer of any PartnerRe share which is not a fully-paid PartnerRe share. The PartnerRe board of directors may also decline to register any transfer unless: (i) the instrument of transfer (if any) is duly stamped (as required by law) and lodged with PartnerRe, accompanied by the certificate of the PartnerRe shares to which it relates and such other evidence that the PartnerRe board may reasonably require to show the right of the transferor to the transfer; (ii) the instrument of transfer (if any) is in favour of less than five persons jointly; and (iii) it is satisfied that all applicable consents, authorizations, permissions, or approvals of any governmental body or agency in Bermuda or any other applicable jurisdiction required to be obtained under the relevant law prior to such transfer have been obtained. In addition, under the PartnerRe bye-laws, no person shall be permitted to: (i) own or control PartnerRe shares in excess of 9.9% of the outstanding PartnerRe shares (determined by value) or (ii) be a Ten Percent Shareholder determined in accordance with the PartnerRe bye-laws. Accordingly no person shall be registered as holder of PartnerRe shares, no PartnerRe shares may be issued, purchased or transferred (including by reason of the death of a shareholder) and no alteration of capital may occur if as a result of such | The AXIS directors may decline to approve or register any transfer of shares if it appears to the AXIS directors, in their sole and reasonable discretion, after taking into account, among other things, the limitation on voting rights contained in the AXIS bye-laws, that any non-de minimis adverse tax, legal or regulatory consequence to AXIS, any subsidiary of AXIS, or any other holder of shares or its affiliates would result from such transfer (including if such consequence arises as a result of any such U.S. Person owning Controlled Shares that constitute 9.5% or more of the value of AXIS or the voting shares of AXIS (but subject to the provisions of the bye-laws under “Adjustment of Voting Powers and Ownership Limitations”)). Under the AXIS bye-laws, subject to any applicable requirements of the NYSE, the AXIS directors: (a) may decline to approve or to register any transfer of any share if a written opinion from counsel acceptable to AXIS has not been obtained to the effect that registration of such shares under the Securities Act, as amended, is not required and (b) shall decline to approve or to register any transfer of any share if the transferee shall not have been approved by applicable governmental authorities if such approval is required. | The Newco board of directors may in its absolute discretion and without assigning any reason therefor refuse to register the transfer of a Newco share which is not fully paid up. The Newco board of directors shall refuse to register a transfer unless all applicable consents, authorisations and permissions of any governmental body or agency in Bermuda have been obtained. The Newco board of directors may decline to approve or register or permit the registration of any transfer of Newco shares if the Newco board of directors in its sole discretion determines that any adverse tax, regulatory or legal consequences to Newco, any subsidiary of Newco or any direct or indirect holder of shares or its affiliates would result from such transfer. |
PartnerRe | AXIS | Newco |
registration, issuance, purchase, transfer or alteration, as applicable, a person would (i) own or control PartnerRe shares in excess of 9.9% of the outstanding PartnerRe shares (determined by value) or (ii) be a Ten Percent Shareholder (determined in accordance with the PartnerRe bye-laws). “Own” or “Control” with respect to PartnerRe’s shares means “own” under the rules set forth in section 958 of the United States Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (which we refer to as the “Code”). “Ten Percent Shareholder” for the purposes of this section means a person who Owns or Controls more than 9.9% of the total combined voting power of all classes of PartnerRe’s shares entitled to vote at a general meeting of PartnerRe’s shareholders or in any other circumstances in which PartnerRe’s shareholders are entitled to vote. | | |
Business Combination Statutes
A Bermuda company may not enter into certain business transactions with its significant shareholders or affiliates without obtaining prior approval from its board of directors and, in certain instances, its shareholders. Examples of such business transactions include amalgamations, mergers, asset sales and other transactions in which a significant shareholder or affiliate receives or could receive a financial benefit that is greater than that received or to be received by other shareholders.
Approval of Certain Transactions
The Companies Act is silent on whether a company’s shareholders are required to approve a sale, lease or exchange of all or substantially all of a company’s property and assets. However, under the Companies Act, certain forms of amalgamations, mergers and restructurings require shareholder approval.
Under the Companies Act, the amalgamation or merger of a Bermuda company with another company or corporation (other than certain affiliated companies in which case a short form amalgamation or merger may be used) requires the amalgamation or merger agreement to be approved by the company’s board of directors and by its shareholders. Unless the company’s bye-laws provide otherwise (as described in the context of the amalgamation elsewhere in this document), the approval of three-fourths of the shareholders (i.e., 75%) voting at a general meeting is required to approve the amalgamation or merger agreement, and the quorum necessary for such meeting is two persons holding or representing more than one-third of the issued shares of the company. The required vote of shareholders may be reduced if the company’s bye-laws provide as such. For the purposes of the approval of an amalgamation or merger, all shares, whether or not otherwise entitled to vote, carry the right to vote. A separate vote of a class of shares is required if the rights of such class would be altered by virtue of the amalgamation or merger.
Appraisal Rights/Dissenters’ Rights
Under the Companies Act, a dissenting shareholder of an amalgamating or merging company who did not vote in favor of the amalgamation or merger and who is not satisfied that he or she has been offered fair value for his or her shares may within one month of the giving of the notice sent to each shareholder calling the meeting at which the amalgamation or merger was decided upon apply to the Bermuda Court to appraise the fair value of his or her shares. Within one month of the Bermuda Court appraising the fair value of any shares where the amalgamation or merger has not proceeded, the amalgamated or surviving company shall be entitled to either: (i) pay to any shareholder an amount equal to the value of his or her shares as appraised by the Bermuda Court; or (ii) terminate the amalgamation or merger in accordance with the Companies Act.
Where the Bermuda Court has appraised the fair value of any shares and the amalgamation or merger has proceeded prior to the appraisal then, within one month of the Bermuda Court appraising the value of the shares, if the amount paid to any shareholder for his or her shares is less than that appraised by the Bermuda Court, the amalgamated or surviving company shall pay to such shareholder the difference between the amount paid to him or her and the value appraised by the Bermuda Court.
There shall be no right of appeal from an appraisal by the Bermuda Court. The costs of any application to the Bermuda Court to appraise the fair value of any shares shall be in the discretion of the Bermuda Court.
Inspection of Books and Records; Shareholder Lists
Under the Companies Act the shareholders have access to the following: (i) a company’s public documents available at the Registrar of Companies, which includes a company’s memorandum of association and any alterations thereto, including any increase or reduction of the company’s authorized capital; (ii) directly from the company: (A) copies of the memorandum of association and the bye-laws in return for payment; (B) minutes of general meetings without charge for not less than two hours per day during business hours or copies of such minutes of such meetings on payment of reasonable charge; and (C) audited financial statements of the company, which must be placed before the shareholders at an annual general meeting. The Companies Act also provides that during business hours the register of members and the register of directors and officers must be open to inspection by the public at a company’s registered office for at least two hours each day. A company is required to maintain a share register in Bermuda but may, subject to the provisions of the Companies Act, establish a branch register outside Bermuda.
Bermuda law does not, however, provide for a general right for shareholders to inspect or obtain copies of any other corporate records.
Required Purchase and Sales of Shares
Under the Companies Act, a purchaser is generally able to compulsorily acquire the shares of minority holders in the following ways:
| (i) | by a court approved scheme of arrangement under the Companies Act. Schemes may be transfer schemes or cancellation schemes but, unlike a transfer scheme, a cancellation scheme requires the company to pass a solvency test or obtain the agreement of all its creditors to the scheme. In either case, dissenting shareholders do not have express statutory appraisal rights but the Bermuda Court will only sanction a scheme if it is fair. Voting rights attached to shares owned by the offeror may be used to approve the scheme but the Bermuda Court will be concerned to see that the shareholders approving the scheme are representative of the general body of shareholders. Any scheme must be approved by a majority in number representing three-fourths in value of the shareholders present and voting either in person or by proxy at the requisite special general meeting. If there are dissenting shareholders who hold more than 10% of the shares, the Bermuda Court might be persuaded not to exercise its discretion to sanction the scheme on the ground that the scheme constitutes a takeover under the Companies Act and requires 90% acceptance; or |
| (ii) | by a squeeze-out of minority shareholders in a Bermuda company by way of a general offer followed by a squeeze-out under the Companies Act. Broadly, if the offer is approved by the holders of 90% in value of the shares which are the subject of the offer, the offeror can compulsorily acquire the shares of dissenting shareholders. Shares owned by the offeror or its subsidiary or their nominees at the date of the offer do not, however, count towards the 90% acceptance. If the offeror or any of its subsidiaries or any nominee of the offeror or any of its subsidiaries together already own more than 10% of the shares in the subject company at the date of the offer the offeror must offer the same terms to all holders of the same class and the holders who accept the offer, besides holding not less than 90% in value of the shares, must also represent not less than 75% in number of the holders of those shares. These additional restrictions should not apply if the offer is made by a subsidiary of a parent (where the subsidiary does not own more than 10% of the shares of the subject company) even where the parent owns more than 10% of the shares of the subject company, provided that the subsidiary and the parent are not nominees. The 90% must be obtained within four months after the making of the offer and, once obtained, the compulsory acquisition may be commenced within two months of the acquisition of 90%. Dissenting shareholders do not have express appraisal rights but are entitled to seek relief (within one month of the compulsory acquisition notice) from the Bermuda Court which has power to make such orders as it thinks fit; or |
| (iii) | by the holders of 95% or more of the shares or any class of shares serving a notice on the remaining shareholders or class of shareholders under the Companies Act. Dissenting shareholders have a right to apply to the Bermuda Court within one month of receiving the compulsory acquisition notice to have the value of their shares appraised by the Bermuda Court. If one dissenting shareholder applies to the Bermuda Court and is successful in obtaining a higher valuation, that valuation must be paid to all minority shareholders who were the subject of the notice. |
The following discussion, subject to the limitations and qualifications described herein, constitutes the opinion of Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP (with respect to holders of PartnerRe common shares) and Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP (with respect to holders of AXIS common shares) as to the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the amalgamation applicable to U.S. holders (as defined below) of PartnerRe common shares or AXIS common shares that receive amalgamated company common shares and cash in lieu of fractional shares in the amalgamation, to the extent such discussion sets forth statements of U.S. federal income tax law or legal conclusions with respect thereto. The tax opinions of Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP and Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP are based, in part, on representations made by PartnerRe and AXIS with respect to certain factual matters and on customary factual assumptions. If any of the factual representations or assumptions on which the opinions described above are based are inaccurate as of the effective time of the amalgamation, the tax consequences to U.S. holders could differ materially from those described below.
The above-described opinions of counsel and the discussion set forth herein are not binding on the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) or any court. No ruling will be sought from the IRS with respect to the tax consequences of the transaction and no assurance can be given that the IRS would not assert, or that a court would not sustain, a position contrary to any of the tax consequences set forth below.
The following discussion is based upon the Code, United States Treasury regulations, judicial authorities, published positions of the IRS, and other applicable authorities, all as currently in effect on the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus and all of which are subject to change or differing interpretations (possibly with retroactive effect). This discussion is limited to holders that hold their PartnerRe common shares and AXIS common shares (and who will hold their amalgamated company common shares after the amalgamation) as capital assets for United States federal income tax purposes (generally, assets held for investment). This discussion does not address all of the tax consequences that may be relevant to a particular shareholder or to shareholders that are subject to special treatment under United States federal income tax laws, such as:
| · | tax-exempt organizations; |
| · | regulated investment companies and real estate investment trusts; |
| · | S corporations, partnerships or other pass-through entities (and investors in such entities); |
| · | dealers in securities or currencies; |
| · | traders in securities who elect the mark-to-market method of accounting for their securities; |
| · | shareholders that hold their PartnerRe common shares or AXIS common shares as part of a “straddle,” “conversion transaction” or other integrated transaction; |
| · | shareholders who acquired their PartnerRe common shares or AXIS common shares pursuant to the exercise of employee share options or otherwise in connection with the performance of services; |
| · | shareholders who have a functional currency other than the United States dollar; |
| · | persons who are considered 10% U.S. shareholders (as defined below) with respect to either PartnerRe or AXIS; and |
| · | shareholders who exercise their appraisal rights. |
This discussion also does not address the tax consequences to holders of PartnerRe preferred shares or AXIS preferred shares that receive amalgamated company preferred shares in the amalgamation. Holders of PartnerRe preferred shares or AXIS preferred shares are urged to consult their tax advisors as to the United States federal, state, local and non-United States tax consequences to them of participating in the amalgamation, some of which are uncertain and may depend on such holders’ individual circumstances.
In addition, this discussion does not address the tax consequences to PartnerRe or AXIS or other U.S. federal taxes (such as gift or estate taxes or liability for the alternative minimum tax), the tax consequences of the transaction under state, local or foreign tax laws, certain tax reporting requirements that may be applicable with respect to the transaction or the Medicare tax on “net investment income.”
For purposes of this discussion, the term “U.S. holder” means a beneficial owner of AXIS common shares or PartnerRe common shares that is (i) a citizen or resident of the United States, (ii) a corporation (or other entity treated as a corporation for United States federal income tax purposes) created or organized under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia or (iii) an estate or trust, the income of which is subject to United States federal income tax regardless of its source.
If a partnership (or other entity treated as a partnership for United States federal income tax purposes) is an AXIS or PartnerRe shareholder, the United States federal income tax treatment of a partner in the partnership will generally depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. A partner in a partnership holding AXIS common shares or PartnerRe common shares should consult its tax advisors with respect to the tax consequences of the transaction.
Shareholders are urged to consult their tax advisors as to the particular United States federal income tax consequences of the transaction to them, as well as any tax consequences arising under any state, local and non-United States tax laws or any other United States federal tax laws.
The Amalgamation
It is a condition to the obligations of PartnerRe and AXIS to complete the amalgamation that each shall have received an opinion of its respective tax counsel, dated as of the closing date of the amalgamation, that the amalgamation will qualify as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code and that each of PartnerRe, AXIS and the amalgamated company will be a “party to the reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(b) of the Code. These opinions will be based, in part, on representations made by PartnerRe and AXIS with respect to certain factual matters and on customary factual assumptions. Although the amalgamation agreement allows PartnerRe and AXIS to waive the opinion requirements as a condition to closing, neither PartnerRe nor AXIS currently anticipates doing so. If either PartnerRe or AXIS does waive these conditions, you will be informed of this decision prior to being asked to vote on the transaction.
Based on the foregoing, including the representations made by PartnerRe and AXIS and the customary factual assumptions referred to above, the amalgamation will qualify as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code and each of PartnerRe, AXIS and the amalgamated company will be a “party to the reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(b) of the Code. Therefore, the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the transactions will be as follows.
Tax Treatment of Exchange of Shares. Upon the exchange by a U.S. holder of PartnerRe common shares or AXIS common shares for amalgamated company common shares:
· no gain or loss will be recognized by U.S. holders (except with respect to any cash received in lieu of a fractional share, as discussed below);
· the aggregate basis of the amalgamated company common shares received in the amalgamation (including fractional shares deemed received and sold for cash, as discussed below), will be equal to the U.S. holder’s aggregate tax basis in its PartnerRe common shares or AXIS common shares exchanged in the transaction;
· the holding period of the amalgamated company common shares received in exchange for PartnerRe common shares or AXIS common shares will include the holding period of the PartnerRe common shares or AXIS common shares for which they are exchanged.
If a U.S. holder acquired its PartnerRe common shares or AXIS common shares at different times or at different prices, such U.S. holder’s basis and holding period in the amalgamated company common shares received in the amalgamation will be determined separately with respect to each block of PartnerRe common shares or AXIS common shares held. A block generally consists of shares acquired at the same cost in a single transaction. If a U.S. holder holds both PartnerRe common shares and AXIS common shares, the PartnerRe common shares and AXIS common shares held by such U.S. holder will be treated as separate blocks, even if acquired at the same cost in a single transaction.
Cash in Lieu of a Fractional Share. If a U.S. holder receives cash in lieu of a fractional amalgamated company common share, the U.S. holder will be treated as having received the fractional share pursuant to the amalgamation and then as having sold that fractional share for cash. As a result, such a U.S. holder generally will recognize gain or loss equal to the difference between the amount of cash received and its basis in the fractional amalgamated company common share, determined as described above. This gain or loss generally will be capital gain or loss, and will be long-term capital gain or loss if, as of the closing date of the amalgamation, the holding period for the fractional share that such U.S. holder is treated as having received is greater than one year, determined as described above. Long-term capital gains of individuals are generally eligible for reduced rates of taxation. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations.
Treatment of Pre-Acquisition Dividends. The amalgamation agreement permits the payment of certain dividends to holders of PartnerRe common shares and AXIS common shares between the signing date of the amalgamation agreement and the closing date of the amalgamation. The amalgamation agreement also permits the amount of certain quarterly cash dividends payable to holders of PartnerRe common shares between the signing date of the amalgamation agreement and the closing date of the amalgamation to be increased (any such dividend, an “increased PartnerRe cash dividend”). PartnerRe and the amalgamated company intend to take the position that any such increased PartnerRe cash dividend is treated for tax purposes as a distribution of property by PartnerRe to shareholders, that is taxable under the rules described below at “—Consequences of Owning Amalgamated Company Common Shares—Distributions.” Because there is no authority directly addressing facts similar to the payment of increased PartnerRe cash dividends in the amalgamation, it is possible that any such increased PartnerRe cash dividends could be recharacterized as additional consideration received in the amalgamation. If all or a portion of any increased PartnerRe cash dividend payments were so treated, the tax consequences to holders of PartnerRe common shares could be different from the treatment of dividends described below, including that the dividend might not result in “qualified dividend income” to such holders.
Passive Foreign Investment Company Status. If PartnerRe or AXIS is or was classified as a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. holder held PartnerRe or AXIS common shares, respectively, such U.S. holder may be subject to adverse U.S. federal income tax treatment upon the exchange of such shares for amalgamated company common shares (including that the exchange may be treated as a taxable transaction) or the amalgamated company is also treated as a PFIC for the taxable year that includes the closing date of the amalgamation. Both PartnerRe and AXIS have indicated in public filings that they do not believe that they are or have been PFICs. In addition, neither PartnerRe nor AXIS believes that the amalgamated company will be treated as a PFIC for the taxable year of the amalgamation and do not expect the amalgamated company to become a PFIC in the foreseeable future. See “—Consequences of Owning Amalgamated Company Common Shares—Application of Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules” below. However, the determination of PFIC status is factual in nature, depends on the application of complex U.S. federal income tax rules that are subject to differing interpretations, and generally cannot be determined until the close of the taxable year in question. Further, neither PartnerRe’s nor AXIS’ counsel has made any determination regarding the PFIC status of either company or the amalgamated company for any taxable year. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that PartnerRe or AXIS is or was not a PFIC for its current or any prior taxable year. U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the classification of PartnerRe or AXIS as a PFIC, and the effect of the PFIC rules on such holder.
Backup Withholding and Information Reporting. Cash received in lieu of a fractional share by a non-corporate U.S. holder of PartnerRe or AXIS common shares may, under certain circumstances, be subject to information reporting. In addition, cash received by a non-corporate U.S. holder in lieu of a fractional share may be
subject to backup withholding unless the holder provides proof of an applicable exemption or furnishes its taxpayer identification number and otherwise complies with all applicable requirements of the backup withholding rules. Any amounts withheld from payments to a holder under the backup withholding rules are not additional tax and generally will be allowed as a refund or credit against the holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, provided the required information is timely furnished to the IRS.
Consequences of Owning Amalgamated Company Common Shares
Distributions. Subject to the discussion below relating to the potential application of the “controlled foreign corporation,” “related person insurance income” and PFIC rules, cash distributions made with respect to shares of amalgamated company common shares will constitute dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the extent paid out of the amalgamated company’s current or accumulated earnings and profits as computed using U.S. tax principles. U.S. holders of amalgamated company common shares generally will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on the receipt of such dividends. Such dividends will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction provided to corporations by Section 243 of the Code. To the extent that a distribution exceeds the amalgamated company’s current and accumulated earnings and profits, it will first be treated as a return of the U.S. holder’s basis to the extent thereof, and then as gain from the sale of a capital asset, subject to the discussion below related to the potential application of the “controlled foreign corporation,” “related person insurance income” and PFIC rules.
Subject to applicable limitations, certain dividends received by certain non-corporate U.S. holders from the amalgamated company will be taxed at favorable rates applicable to “qualified dividend income,” provided certain holding period requirements are met and the amalgamated company is treated as a qualified foreign corporation with respect to the shares on which such dividend is paid. The amalgamated company will be treated as a qualified foreign corporation with respect to dividends paid on shares that are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States. It is expected that amalgamated company common shares will be listed on the NYSE, and, pursuant to Treasury Department guidance, such shares will be readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States upon such listing. There can be no assurance that amalgamated company common shares will be considered readily tradable on an established securities market in the future. Non-corporate shareholders that do not meet a minimum holding period requirement during which they are not protected from the risk of loss or that elect to treat the dividend income as “investment income” pursuant to Section 163(d)(4) of the Code will not be eligible for the reduced rates of taxation regardless of the amalgamated company’s status as a qualified foreign corporation. In addition, the rate reduction will not apply to dividends if the recipient of the dividend is obligated to make related payments with respect to positions in substantially similar or related property. This disallowance applies even if the minimum holding period has been met. This discussion is based on PartnerRe’s and AXIS’ belief that the amalgamated company is not expected to be classified as a PFIC (as discussed further below).
Sales, Exchanges or Other Dispositions of Amalgamated Company Shares. In general, a U.S. holder will recognize gain or loss on a sale, exchange, or other taxable disposition (collectively, a “disposition”) of an amalgamated company common share in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized and the adjusted tax basis for that share. Subject to the discussion below relating to the potential application of the “controlled foreign corporation,” “related person insurance income” and PFIC rules, gain or loss on the disposition of a share of amalgamated company common shares generally will be capital gain or loss, and generally will be long-term capital gain or loss if, at the time of the disposition, the U.S. holder has a holding period for the amalgamated company common share of more than one year. Capital gains of individuals in respect of capital assets held for more than one year are eligible for reduced rates of taxation. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations. Additionally, any gain or loss on the disposition of an amalgamated company common share generally will be U.S. sourced and generally will constitute “passive income” for foreign tax credit limitation purposes.
Application of Controlled Foreign Corporation Rules. Generally, each “10% U.S. shareholder” (as defined below), including in certain circumstances one that is generally tax-exempt, that owns, directly or indirectly through one or more foreign entities, shares of a foreign corporation that is a “controlled foreign corporation” (“CFC”) for an uninterrupted period of 30 days or more during any taxable year must include in its gross income its pro rata share of the “subpart F income” realized by the CFC for such year, even if that income is not distributed. “Subpart F income” of a foreign insurance corporation typically includes passive income such as interest and dividends, as well as insurance and reinsurance income (including underwriting and investment income) attributable to the insurance of risks situated outside the CFC’s country of incorporation.
A “10% U.S. shareholder” of a foreign corporation is any U.S. holder that owns, directly or indirectly through one or more foreign entities, or is considered to own (by application of certain constructive ownership rules), 10% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of shares of the foreign corporation. In general, a foreign corporation will be treated as a CFC only if its 10% U.S. shareholders collectively own (directly, indirectly through foreign entities, or by application of certain constructive ownership rules) more than 50% (or 25%, in the case of an insurance company with respect to certain insurance income) of its total combined voting power or value. In particular, the non-U.S. subsidiaries of the amalgamated company that are insurance companies (each, a “non-U.S. insurance subsidiary”) generally will be treated as CFCs if 10% U.S. shareholders collectively own more than 25% of the relevant non-U.S. insurance subsidiary’s total combined voting power or value.
PartnerRe and AXIS believe that because of the anticipated dispersion of share ownership of the amalgamated company, provisions in the amalgamated company’s organizational documents that limit voting power and other factors, no U.S. holder who owns shares of the amalgamated company directly or indirectly through one or more foreign entities should be treated as owning (directly, indirectly through foreign entities, or by application of certain constructive ownership rules), 10% or more of the total voting power of all classes of shares of the amalgamated company or any of its non-U.S. subsidiaries. It is possible, however, that the IRS could challenge the effectiveness of these provisions and that a court could sustain such a challenge.
Each prospective investor should consult its own tax advisor to determine whether its ownership interest would cause it to become a 10% U.S. shareholder of the amalgamated company or any of its subsidiaries and to determine the impact of such a classification of such investor.
Application of Related Person Insurance Income Rules - Potential Inclusion of Related Person Insurance Income. Special rules apply to U.S. persons that own shares of non-U.S. corporations that earn RPII. Because the amalgamated company will be a holding company, and will not itself be licensed as an insurance company, neither PartnerRe nor AXIS expect the amalgamated company to have any “insurance income,” as defined below, including RPII. However, the RPII rules of the Code will apply to U.S. holders (including tax-exempt persons) who, through their ownership of amalgamated company common shares, are indirect shareholders of a non-U.S. insurance subsidiary if both (A) the non-U.S. insurance subsidiary is a CFC for RPII purposes (a “RPII CFC”) (which will be the case if, as is anticipated, 25% or more of the value or voting power of such non-U.S. insurance subsidiary’s shares is owned (directly, indirectly through foreign entities, or by the application of certain constructive ownership rules) by U.S. holders), and (B) none of the exceptions described below apply.
RPII is “insurance income” (as defined below) from the direct or indirect insurance or reinsurance of any U.S. person who holds shares of the applicable non-U.S. insurance subsidiary (directly or indirectly through foreign entities) or of a person related to such a U.S. person. In general, and subject to certain limitations, “insurance income” is income (including investment income and premium income) attributable to the issuing of any insurance or reinsurance contract that would be taxed under the portions of the Code relating to insurance companies if the income were the income of a domestic insurance company. A non-U.S. insurance subsidiary may be considered to indirectly reinsure the risk of a U.S. person that holds shares, directly or indirectly, and thus generate RPII, if an unrelated company that insured such risk in the first instance reinsures the risk with such non-U.S. insurance subsidiary.
The RPII rules do not apply to income derived from a non-U.S. insurance subsidiary if (1) direct and indirect insureds and persons related to such insureds, whether or not U.S. persons, are treated as owning (directly or indirectly through entities) less than 20% of the voting power and less than 20% of the value of the shares of such non-U.S. insurance subsidiary (the “20% ownership exception”), (2) RPII, determined on a gross basis, is less than 20% of the gross insurance income of such non-U.S. insurance subsidiary for the taxable year (the “20% gross income exception”), (3) the non-U.S. insurance subsidiary elects to be taxed on its RPII as if the RPII were effectively connected with the conduct of a U.S. trade or business, waives all U.S. treaty benefits with respect to RPII, and meets certain other requirements or (4) the non-U.S. subsidiary elects to be treated as a U.S. corporation, waives all U.S. treaty benefits and meets certain other requirements. Although there can be no assurance, PartnerRe and AXIS each expect that the non-U.S. insurance subsidiaries of the amalgamated company will operate in a manner that is intended to ensure that such non-U.S. insurance subsidiaries qualify for the 20% ownership exception or the 20% gross income exception.
If none of the exceptions described above applies to a non-U.S. insurance subsidiary for any taxable year, each U.S. person (including a U.S. holder) who, directly or indirectly through foreign entities, owns any shares in
the amalgamated company (and, therefore, indirectly holds shares of such non-U.S. insurance subsidiary) (a “RPII holder”) on the last day of such non-U.S. insurance subsidiary’s taxable year would be taxable currently with respect to its allocable share of the RPII (whether distributed or not) for the portion of the taxable year during which the non-U.S. insurance subsidiary was a RPII CFC. For this purpose, all of such non-U.S. insurance subsidiary’s RPII would be allocated solely to RPII holders but only to the extent of their ratable share of such non-U.S. insurance subsidiary’s total earnings and profits for the taxable year. A RPII holder who owns common shares of the amalgamated company during a taxable year but not on the last day of the taxable year, which would normally be December 31, is generally not required to include in gross income any part of a non-U.S. insurance subsidiary’s RPII. Such inclusion should be further limited to the amount such U.S. holder would be required to include in its gross income under the general CFC rules of the Code if all of the taxable income of such non-U.S. insurance subsidiary for the taxable year were subpart F income. The amount of RPII includible in the income of a RPII holder is based upon the net RPII income for the year after deducting related expenses such as losses, loss reserves and operating expenses.
Computation of RPII. The amalgamated company may not be able to determine whether any of the direct or indirect insureds to which the non-U.S. insurance subsidiaries provide insurance or reinsurance or persons related thereto own (directly or indirectly through foreign entities) amalgamated company shares and are U.S. persons. Consequently, the amalgamated company may not be able to determine accurately the gross amount of the non-U.S. insurance subsidiaries’ RPII in a given taxable year. For any year that the amalgamated company determines that neither the 20% gross income exception nor the 20% ownership exception applies, the amalgamated company may also seek information from its shareholders as to whether beneficial owners of the amalgamated company’s shares at the end of the year are U.S. holders so that RPII may be apportioned among such persons. To the extent the amalgamated company is unable to determine whether a beneficial owner of its shares is a U.S. holder, it may assume that such owner is not a U.S. holder for purposes of apportioning RPII, thereby increasing the per share RPII amount for all RPII holders. If, as expected, the 20% gross income exception or 20% ownership exception is met for each taxable year, RPII holders will not be required to include RPII in their taxable income.
Basis Adjustments. Under proposed regulations, a RPII holder’s tax basis in shares of the amalgamated company (including shares received in the amalgamation) will be increased by the amount of any RPII that the shareholder includes in income. The RPII holder may exclude from income the amount of any distribution by the amalgamated company to the extent of the RPII included in income for the year in which the distribution was paid or for any prior year (and not previously distributed). The RPII holder’s tax basis in the shares of the amalgamated company that it holds will be reduced by the amount of such distributions that are excluded from income.
Dispositions of Amalgamated Company Shares. Section 1248 of the Code generally provides that if a U.S. holder sells or exchanges shares in a foreign corporation and such person is a 10% U.S. shareholder at any time during the 5-year period ending on the date of the sale or exchange when such foreign corporation was a CFC, any gain from such sale or exchange may be treated as ordinary income to the extent of the CFC’s earnings and profits (determined under U.S. federal income tax principles) attributable to such shares, during the period that the U.S. holder held the shares (with certain adjustments). A 10% U.S. shareholder will be required to report a disposition of shares of a CFC by attaching IRS Form 5471 to the U.S. income tax or information return that it would normally file for the taxable year in which the disposition occurs.
Section 953(c)(7) of the Code generally provides that Section 1248 will also apply to gain recognized by a RPII holder with respect to the sale or exchange of shares in a foreign corporation that earns RPII and is characterized as a RPII CFC if the foreign corporation would be taxed as an insurance company if it were a domestic corporation, regardless of whether the RPII holder is a 10% U.S. shareholder or whether the 20% gross income exception or the 20% ownership exception applies. Neither existing nor proposed Treasury regulations clarify whether Section 1248 and the requirement to file IRS Form 5471 would apply with respect to the disposition of shares in a foreign corporation (such as the amalgamated company) that is not itself a RPII CFC but has a non-U.S. insurance subsidiary that is a RPII CFC and that would be taxed as an insurance company if it were a domestic corporation. Accordingly, it is possible that Section 1248 and the requirement to file IRS Form 5471 do not apply to a RPII holder that is not a 10% U.S. shareholder of the amalgamated company because the amalgamated company is not directly engaged in the insurance business. There can be no assurance, however, that the IRS will interpret the regulations in this manner or that the Treasury Department will not amend the regulations to provide that Section 1248 and the requirement to file IRS Form 5471 will apply to dispositions of amalgamated company common shares in respect of the amalgamated company’s ownership of the non-U.S. insurance subsidiaries. U.S. holders should
consult their tax advisors regarding the effects of these rules on a disposition of shares of amalgamated company common shares.
Application of Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules. In general, a foreign corporation will be a PFIC during a given year if (i) 75% or more of its gross income constitutes “passive income” or (ii) 50% or more of its assets produce (or are held for the production of) passive income. For purposes of the PFIC determination, passive income generally includes interest, dividends, annuities and other investment income. The PFIC statutory provisions, however, contain an express exception for income derived in the active conduct of an insurance business by a corporation which is predominantly engaged in an insurance business.
This exception is intended to ensure that income derived by a bona fide insurance company is not treated as passive income, except to the extent such income is attributable to financial reserves in excess of the reasonable needs of the insurance business. PartnerRe and AXIS expect for purposes of the PFIC rules that each non-U.S. insurance subsidiary of the amalgamated company will be predominantly engaged in an insurance business and is unlikely to have financial reserves in excess of the reasonable needs of its insurance business. Accordingly, neither expects the income or assets of the non-U.S. insurance subsidiaries to be treated as passive. The PFIC statutory provisions contain a look-through rule stating that, for purposes of determining whether a foreign corporation is a PFIC, such foreign corporation shall be treated as if it received directly its proportionate share of the income and as if it held its proportionate share of the assets of any other corporation in which it owns at least 25% by value of the shares.
While no explicit guidance is provided by the statutory language, under this look-through rule the amalgamated company should be deemed to own its proportionate share of the assets and to have received its proportionate share of the income of its direct and indirect subsidiaries for purposes of determining whether it qualifies for the insurance exception. Consequently, PartnerRe and AXIS do not expect that the amalgamated company will be treated as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Nevertheless, there are currently no Treasury regulations regarding the application of the PFIC provisions to an insurance company, and new Treasury regulations or pronouncements interpreting or clarifying these rules may be forthcoming. In addition, the determination of PFIC status is factual in nature, depends on the application of complex U.S. federal income tax rules that are subject to differing interpretations, and generally cannot be determined until the close of the taxable year in question. Therefore, there can be no assurance that the IRS will not challenge this position or that a court will not sustain such challenge. U.S. holders should consult their tax advisors as to the effects of the PFIC rules.
If the amalgamated company were treated as a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. holder holds amalgamated company common shares and the U.S. holder does not make a “mark-to-market” election or a “qualified electing fund” election with respect to the amalgamated company, as described below, the following consequences would apply to (i) any “excess distribution” that the U.S. holder receives from the amalgamated company or is treated under applicable rules as receiving from the amalgamated company and (ii) any gain that the U.S. holder recognizes on a sale or other disposition (including, under certain circumstances, a pledge) of its amalgamated company common shares or that the U.S. holder is treated under applicable rules as recognizing on a sale by the amalgamated company of any shares of any non-U.S. subsidiary that is also treated as a PFIC. For purposes of these rules, an “excess distribution” is any distribution received by a U.S. holder with respect to its amalgamated company common shares that exceeds 125% of the average of the annual distributions on the shares received during the preceding three years or the U.S. holder’s holding period, whichever is shorter. Any such “excess distribution” or gain would be treated as having been earned ratably over the U.S. holder’s holding period for its amalgamated company common shares. The portion of the “excess distribution,” or of the sale or other disposition allocated to the current taxable year and any taxable year prior to the first taxable year in which the amalgamated company was a PFIC would be treated as ordinary income. The portion allocated to each prior taxable year in which the amalgamated company was a PFIC would be subject to U.S. federal income tax at the highest marginal rate in effect for the type of U.S. holder (corporate or individual) for such taxable year, and an interest charge generally applicable to under-payments of U.S. federal income tax would be imposed on the resulting tax liability for each prior taxable year. In addition, a distribution paid by the amalgamated company to U.S. holders that is characterized as a dividend and is not characterized as an excess distribution would not be eligible for treatment as qualified dividend income if the amalgamated company were considered a PFIC in the taxable year in which such dividend is paid or in the preceding taxable year.
If the amalgamated company were treated as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes, a U.S. holder could mitigate the consequences of the possible application of the PFIC rules by making a timely “mark-to-market” election or “qualified electing fund” election with respect to the amalgamated company. Neither PartnerRe nor AXIS expects the amalgamated company to provide information necessary for U.S. holders to make “qualified electing fund” elections. If the U.S. holder made a timely “mark-to-market” election, the U.S. holder generally would recognize as ordinary income any excess of the fair market value of the U.S. holder’s amalgamated company common shares at the end of each taxable year over the U.S. holder’s adjusted tax basis in its shares, and would recognize an ordinary loss in respect of any excess of the U.S. holder’s adjusted tax basis in its shares over the fair market value of the U.S. holder’s shares at the end of the taxable year (but only to the extent of the net amount of income previously included as a result of the “mark-to-market” election). If a U.S. holder made the “mark-to-market” election, the U.S. holder’s tax basis in its amalgamated company common shares would be adjusted to reflect the income or loss amounts recognized. Any gain recognized on the sale or other disposition of the U.S. holder’s amalgamated company common shares in a year when the amalgamated company is a PFIC will be treated as ordinary income and any loss would be treated as an ordinary loss (but only to the extent of the net amount of income previously included as a result of the “mark-to-market” election). Distributions paid on amalgamated company common shares will be treated as discussed above under “—Consequences of Owning Amalgamated Company Common Shares—Distributions.”
If a U.S. holder owns amalgamated company common shares during any year in which the amalgamated company is a PFIC, the holder generally must file IRS Form 8621(or any successor form) with respect to the amalgamated company. U.S. holders should consult their tax advisors concerning the amalgamated company’s PFIC status and the tax considerations relevant to an investment in a PFIC.
Foreign Tax Credit. Because it is anticipated that U.S. holders will own a majority of the amalgamated company common shares, it is possible that only a portion of current income inclusions, if any, under the CFC, RPII and PFIC rules and of dividends paid by the amalgamated company (including any gain from the sale of amalgamated company common shares that is treated as a dividend under Section 1248 of the Code) will be foreign source income for purposes of computing a shareholder’s U.S. foreign tax credit limitation. Thus, it may not be possible for a U.S. holder to utilize excess foreign tax credits to reduce U.S. tax on such income. The rules governing foreign tax credits are complex, and U.S. holders should consult their tax advisors regarding the creditability of foreign taxes in their particular circumstances.
Backup Withholding and Information Reporting. Cash payments (including dividends and proceeds from a disposition) received by a non-corporate U.S. holder of amalgamated company common shares may, under certain circumstances, be subject to information reporting. In addition, cash payments made to a non-corporate U.S. holder may be subject to backup withholding unless the holder provides proof of an applicable exemption or furnishes its taxpayer identification number and otherwise complies with all applicable requirements of the backup withholding rules. Any amounts withheld from payments to a holder under the backup withholding rules are not additional tax and generally will be allowed as a refund or credit against the holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, provided the required information is timely furnished to the IRS.
The following description of Newco’s share capital summarizes certain provisions of its memorandum of association and bye-laws that will become effective upon the consummation of the amalgamation.
The summary does not purport to be complete and is subject to, and is qualified in their entirety by reference to, all of the provisions of Newco’s memorandum of association and bye-laws, copies of which have been filed as exhibits to the registration statement of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus forms a part. Prospective investors are urged to read the exhibits for a complete understanding of Newco’s memorandum of association and bye-laws.
Immediately following the amalgamation Newco will be an exempted limited liability company incorporated under the laws of Bermuda. It will be registered with the Registrar of Companies in Bermuda under registration number 18620. Its date of incorporation is 24 August 1993 under the name PartnerRe Holdings Ltd. and it changed its name to PartnerRe Ltd. on 8 May 1995. Its registered office will be located at 2 Church Street, Hamilton, Bermuda. Its agent for service of process in the United States will be CT Corporation, 111 Eighth Avenue, 13th Floor, New York, NY 10011.
Immediately following the amalgamation Newco’s objects will be unrestricted and it will have the capacity of a natural person. It can therefore undertake activities without restriction on its capacity.
The following is a summary of Newco’s bye-laws that will become effective upon the consummation of the amalgamation.
Effective upon the consummation of the amalgamation, Newco’s authorized share capital will consist of common shares, par value $0.0125 per share, preferred shares par value $0.0125 per share, preferred shares par value $1.00 per share and undesignated shares par value [$0.0125] per share that the Newco board of directors is authorized to issue on such terms and conditions as it may determine.
Upon consummation of the amalgamation, there will be [●] common shares issued and outstanding, [25,028,430] preferred shares, par value $0.0125 per share issued and outstanding and [34,150,000] preferred shares, par value $1.00 per share issued and outstanding. All of Newco’s issued and outstanding shares upon consummation of the amalgamation will be fully paid.
Pursuant to Newco’s bye-laws, subject to the requirements of any stock exchange on which the shares are listed and to any resolution of the shareholders to the contrary, the Newco board of directors is authorized to issue any of the authorized but unissued shares. There are no limitations on the right of non-Bermudians or non-residents of Bermuda to hold or vote Newco’s shares.
The following description of the rights of common shareholders of Newco is subject to such preferred, deferred, qualified or other special rights or such restrictions, whether in regard to dividend, return of capital or otherwise of the holders of preferred shares in each of PartnerRe and AXIS, as set out in the relevant certificate of designation, preference and rights or equivalent respect of such preferred shares.
Holders of common shares have no pre-emptive, redemption, conversion or sinking fund rights. Holders of common shares are entitled to one vote per share on all matters submitted to a vote of holders of common shares subject to any adjustment of voting power. See “—Adjustment to Voting Power”. Unless a different majority is required by law or by Newco’s bye-laws, resolutions to be approved by holders of common shares require approval by the affirmative votes of a majority of votes cast at a meeting at which a quorum is present.
In the event of Newco’s liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the holders of common shares are entitled to share equally and ratably in Newco’s assets, if any, remaining after the payment of all of the company’s debts and liabilities, subject to any liquidation preference on any issued and outstanding preferred shares.
Pursuant to Bermuda law and Newco’s bye-laws, the Newco board of directors may, by resolution, establish one or more series of preferred shares having such number of shares, designations, dividend rates, relative voting rights, conversion or exchange rights, redemption rights, liquidation rights and other relative participation, optional or other special rights, qualifications, limitations or restrictions as may be fixed by the board without any further shareholder approval. Such rights, preferences, powers and limitations as may be established could have the effect of discouraging an attempt to obtain control of the Company.
For the avoidance of doubt, without prejudice to dissenters’ rights, at the effective time each PartnerRe preferred share and each AXIS preferred share issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time will continue as a preferred share of the amalgamated company and will be entitled to the same dividend and other relative rights, preferences, limitations and restrictions as are now provided by the respective certificate of designation, preferences and rights of such PartnerRe preferred shares or AXIS preferred shares, respectively.
The voting power of all Newco shares is adjusted (and shall be automatically adjusted in the future) to the extent necessary so that there is no 9.5% U.S. Member or, in the discretion of the Newco board of directors, no 9.5% Non-U.S Member. The Newco board of directors is required to implement the foregoing in the manner provided in the Newco bye-laws, provided, that the foregoing does not apply in the event that one Newco shareholder owns greater than 75% of the voting power of the issued shares of Newco determined without applying the voting power adjustments or eliminations under the bye-laws.
The Newco board of directors shall from time to time take all reasonable steps necessary to ascertain whether there exists, or will exist at the time any vote of Newco shareholders is taken, a Tentative 9.5% U.S. Member or, in the discretion of the Newco board of directors, a Tentative 9.5% Non-U.S. Member. In the event that a Tentative 9.5% U.S. Member exists, the aggregate votes conferred by shares held by a Newco shareholder and treated as Controlled Shares of that Tentative 9.5% U.S. Member shall be reduced to the extent necessary such that the Controlled Shares of the Tentative 9.5% U.S. Member will constitute less than 9.5% of the voting power of all Newco shares. In applying the previous sentence where Newco shares held by more than one Member are treated as Controlled Shares of such Tentative 9.5% U.S. Member, the reduction in votes shall apply to such Members in descending order according to their respective Attribution Percentages, provided, that, in the event of a tie of Attribution Percentages, the reduction shall apply pro rata to such Members based on the voting power of the shares held by each such Newco shareholder.
The votes of Newco shareholders owning no shares treated as Controlled Shares of any Tentative 9.5% U.S. Member shall, in the aggregate, be increased by the same number of votes subject to reduction as described above, provided, that no shares shall be conferred votes to the extent that doing so will cause any person to be treated as a 9.5% U.S. Member or, unless the Newco board of directors determines otherwise, a 9.5% Non-U.S. Member. The votes described in the preceding sentence shall be apportioned to all such Newco shareholders in proportion to their voting power at that time. The adjustments of voting power described in the bye-laws shall apply repeatedly until there is no 9.5% U.S. Member or, unless the Newco board of directors determines otherwise, no 9.5% Non-U.S. Member. The Newco board of directors may deviate from any of the principles described in the bye-laws and determine that shares held by a Newco shareholder shall carry different voting rights as it reasonably determines, based on the advice of counsel, to be appropriate (a) to avoid the existence of any 9.5% U.S. Member or, unless the Newco board of directors determines otherwise, a 9.5% Non-U.S. Member, or (b) to avoid adverse tax, legal or regulatory consequences to Newco, any subsidiary of Newco or any direct or indirect holder of shares; provided, that the Newco board of directors will use reasonable efforts to afford equal treatment to similarly situated Newco shareholders to the extent possible under the circumstances. In applying any adjustment a share may carry a fraction of a vote.
In the event that a Tentative 9.5% Non-U.S. Member exists, the Newco board of directors in its discretion, may apply procedures similar to the above to reduce the voting power of shares held by a Newco shareholder and treated as shares owned directly or indirectly through a Controlled Entity with respect to such Tentative 9.5% Non-U.S. Member.
In addition to the above, any Newco shares shall not carry any right to vote to the extent that the Newco board of directors determines in its sole discretion that it is necessary that such shares should not carry the right to vote in order to avoid adverse tax, legal or regulatory consequences to Newco, any subsidiary of Newco, or any other direct or indirect holder of shares, provided, that no adjustment pursuant to the Newco bye-laws shall cause any person to become a 9.5% U.S. Member or, unless the Newco board of directors determines otherwise, a 9.5% Non-U.S. Member; and provided, further, that the Newco board of directors will use reasonable efforts to afford equal treatment to similarly situated Newco shareholders to the extent possible under the circumstances.
“9.5% U.S. Member” means a U.S. Person whose Controlled Shares constitute 9.5% or more of the voting power of all shares of Newco and who generally would be required to recognise income with respect to Newco under section 951(a)(1) of the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) if Newco were a controlled foreign corporation as defined in section 957 of the Code and if the ownership threshold under section 951(b) Newco of the Code were 9.5%; and
“9.5% Non-U.S. Member” means a Non-U.S. Person whose shares in Newco owned directly or indirectly through one or more Controlled Entities constitute 9.5% or more of the voting power of all shares of Newco.
“Controlled Entity” means an entity which directly or indirectly controls, is controlled by or is under the common control with such other entity. For the purposes of this definition, the term “control” and its corollaries means the direct or indirect ownership of more than 50% of the equity interests or voting interests in such entity.
“Controlled Shares” means all shares of Newco directly, indirectly or constructively owned by a person as determined pursuant to sections 957 and 958 of the Code and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder.
“Non-U.S. Person” means any person that is not a U.S. Person.
“Tentative 9.5% U.S. Member” means a U.S. Person that, but for adjustments to the voting rights of shares pursuant to the bye-laws, would be a 9.5% U.S. Member.
“Tentative 9.5% Non-U.S. Member” means a Non-U.S. Person whose shares in Newco owned directly or indirectly through one or more Controlled Entities that, but for adjustments to the voting rights of shares pursuant to the bye-laws, would be a 9.5% Non-U.S. Member.
“U.S. Person” means a “United States person” as defined in section 7701(a)(30) of the Code as modified by section 957(c) of the Code.
Under Bermuda law, a company may not declare or pay dividends if there are reasonable grounds for believing that: (i) the company is, or would after the payment be, unable to pay its liabilities as they become due; or (ii) that the realizable value of its assets would thereby be less than its liabilities. Under Newco’s bye-laws, each common share is entitled to dividends if, as and when dividends are declared by the Newco board of directors, subject to any preferred dividend right of the holders of any preferred shares.
If, at any time, Newco’s share capital is divided into different classes of shares, the rights attached to any class (unless otherwise provided by the terms of issue of the shares of that class) may, whether or not Newco is being wound-up, be varied either: (i) with the consent in writing of the holders of three-fourths of the issued shares of that class; or (ii) with the sanction of a resolution passed by a majority of the votes cast at a separate general meeting of the holders of the shares of the class at which meeting the necessary quorum shall be two persons at least holding or representing by proxy one-third of the issued shares of the class. Newco’s bye-laws specify that the rights conferred upon the holders of the shares of any class or series issued with preferred or other rights shall not, unless otherwise expressly provided by the terms of issue of the shares of that class or series, be deemed to be varied by the creation or issue of further shares ranking pari passu therewith.
The Newco board of directors may in its absolute discretion and without assigning any reason, refuse to register the transfer of a share that it is not fully paid. The Newco board of directors may also refuse to recognize an instrument of transfer of a share unless it is accompanied by the relevant share certificate and such other evidence of the transferor’s right to make the transfer as the Newco board of directors shall reasonably require. The Newco board of directors may decline to approve or register or permit the registration of any transfer of shares if the Newco board of directors in its sole discretion determines that any adverse tax, regulatory or legal consequences to Newco, any subsidiary of Newco or any direct or indirect holder of shares or its affiliates would result from such transfer.
Subject to these restrictions, a holder of shares may transfer the title to all or any of his shares by completing a form of transfer in the form set out in Newco’s bye-laws (or as near thereto as circumstances admit) or in such other common form as the Newco board of directors may accept. The instrument of transfer must be signed by the transferor and transferee, although in the case of a fully paid share the Newco board of directors may accept the instrument signed only by the transferor.
Where Newco’s shares are listed or admitted to trading on any appointed stock exchange, such as the [NYSE], they will be transferred in accordance with the rules and regulations of such exchange.
Under the Companies Act, a purchaser is generally able to compulsorily acquire the shares of minority holders in the following ways:
(i) by a court approved scheme of arrangement under the Companies Act. Schemes may be transfer schemes or cancellation schemes but, unlike a transfer scheme, a cancellation scheme requires the company to pass a solvency test or obtain the agreement of all its creditors to the scheme. In either case, dissenting shareholders do not have express statutory appraisal rights but the Bermuda Court will only sanction a scheme if it is fair. Voting rights attached to shares owned by the offeror may be used to approve the scheme but the Bermuda Court will be concerned to see that the shareholders approving the scheme are representative of the general body of shareholders. Any scheme must be approved by a majority in number representing three-fourths in value of the shareholders present and voting either in person or by proxy at the requisite special general meeting. If there are dissenting shareholders who hold more than 10% of the shares, the Bermuda Court might be persuaded not to exercise its discretion to sanction the scheme on the ground that the scheme constitutes a takeover under the Companies Act and requires 90% acceptance; or
(ii) by a squeeze-out of minority shareholders in a Bermuda company by way of a general offer followed by a squeeze-out under the Companies Act. Broadly, if the offer is approved by the holders of 90% in value of the shares which are the subject of the offer, the offeror can compulsorily acquire the shares of dissenting shareholders. Shares owned by the offeror or its subsidiary or their nominees at the date of the offer do not, however, count towards the 90% acceptance. If the offeror or any of its subsidiaries or any nominee of the offeror or any of its subsidiaries together already own more than 10% of the shares in the subject company at the date of the offer the offeror must offer the same terms to all holders of the same class and the holders who accept the offer, besides holding not less than 90% in value of the shares, must also represent not less than 75% in number of the holders of those shares. These additional restrictions should not apply if the offer is made by a subsidiary of a parent (where the subsidiary does not own more than 10% of the shares of the subject company) even where the parent owns more than 10% of the shares of the subject company, provided that the subsidiary and the parent are not nominees. The 90% must be obtained within four months after the making of the offer and, once obtained, the compulsory acquisition may be commenced within two months of the acquisition of 90%. Dissenting shareholders do not have express appraisal rights but are entitled to seek relief (within one month of the compulsory acquisition notice) from the Bermuda Court which has power to make such orders as it thinks fit; or
(iii) by the holders of 95% or more of the shares or any class of shares serving a notice on the remaining shareholders or class of shareholders under the Companies Act. Dissenting shareholders have a right to apply to the Bermuda Court within one month of receiving the compulsory acquisition notice to have the value of their shares appraised by the Bermuda Court. If one dissenting shareholder applies to the Bermuda Court and is successful in obtaining a higher valuation, that valuation must be paid to all minority shareholders who were the subject of the notice.
Subject to the Companies Act, the Newco board of directors, in its absolute discretion, may determine, from time to time and at any time, that ownership of shares or any securities of Newco convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable therefor (collectively, “Securities”) by any shareholder, may result in any adverse tax, regulatory or legal consequence to Newco, any of its subsidiaries or any shareholder or its affiliates, then the Newco board of directors may, in its absolute discretion, determine the extent to which it is necessary or advisable to require the sale by such shareholder of such Securities in order to avoid or cure such violation or adverse consequences.
Under Bermuda law, a dissenting shareholder of an amalgamating or merging company who did not vote in favor of the amalgamation or merger and who is not satisfied that he or she has been offered fair value for his or her shares may within one month of the giving of the notice sent to each shareholder calling the meeting at which the amalgamation or merger was decided upon apply to the Bermuda Court to appraise the fair value of his or her shares. Within one month of the Bermuda Court appraising the fair value of any shares where the amalgamation or merger has not proceeded, the amalgamated or surviving company shall be entitled to either: (i) pay to any shareholder an amount equal to the value of his or her shares as appraised by the Bermuda Court; or (ii) terminate the amalgamation or merger in accordance with the Companies Act.
Where the Bermuda Court has appraised the fair value of any shares and the amalgamation or merger has proceeded prior to the appraisal then, within one month of the Bermuda Court appraising the value of the shares, if the amount paid to any shareholder for his or her shares is less than that appraised by the Bermuda Court, the amalgamated or surviving company shall pay to such shareholder the difference between the amount paid to him or her and the value appraised by the Bermuda Court.
There shall be no right of appeal from an appraisal by the Bermuda Court. The costs of any application to the Bermuda Court to appraise the fair value of any shares shall be in the discretion of the Bermuda Court.
Under Bermuda law, a company is required to convene at least one general meeting of shareholders each calendar year (the “annual general meeting”). However, the shareholders may by resolution waive this requirement, either for a specific year or period of time, or indefinitely. When the requirement has been so waived, any shareholder may, on notice to the company, terminate the waiver, in which case an annual general meeting must be called. Newco’s bye-laws provide that the annual general meeting shall be held in each year at such time and place as the Newco board of directors or its chairman shall appoint.
Bermuda law provides that a special general meeting of shareholders may be called by the Newco board of directors and must be called upon the request of shareholders holding not less than 10% of the paid-up capital of the company carrying the right to vote at general meetings. Bermuda law also requires that shareholders be given at least five days’ advance notice of a general meeting, but the accidental omission to give notice to any person does not invalidate the proceedings at a meeting. Newco’s bye-laws provide that the chairman of the board of directors or the Newco board of directors may convene a special general meeting whenever in their judgment such a meeting is necessary provided that if the Newco board of directors determines, based on the advice of counsel, that any special general meeting must take place outside the United States, then any such special general meeting of Newco purported to be convened and held in the United States shall be void, and any business conducted at any such purported meeting shall be of no force or effect.
Under Newco’s bye-laws, at least 21 days’ notice of an annual general meeting or a special general meeting must be given to each shareholder entitled to vote at such meeting. This notice requirement is subject to the ability to hold such meetings on shorter notice if such notice is agreed: (i) in the case of an annual general meeting by all of the shareholders entitled to attend and vote at such meeting; or (ii) in the case of a special general meeting by a majority in number of the shareholders entitled to attend and vote at the meeting being a majority together holding not less than 95% in nominal value of the shares giving a right to attend and vote at such meeting.
The quorum required for a general meeting of shareholders is two or more persons present in person at the start of the meeting and representing in person or by proxy in excess of 50% of the total issued voting shares.
Members of the general public have a right to inspect the public documents of a company available at the office of the Registrar of Companies in Bermuda. These documents include the company’s memorandum of association, including its objects and powers, and certain alterations to the memorandum of association. The shareholders have the additional right to inspect the bye-laws of the company, minutes of general meetings and the company’s audited financial statements, which must be presented to the annual general meeting. The register of members of a company is also open to inspection by shareholders and by members of the general public without charge. The register of members is required to be open for inspection for not less than two hours in any business day (subject to the ability
of a company to close the register of members for not more than thirty days in a year). A company is required to maintain its share register in Bermuda but may, subject to the provisions of the Companies Act, establish a branch register outside of Bermuda. A company is required to keep at its registered office a register of directors and officers that is open for inspection for not less than two hours in any business day by members of the public without charge. Bermuda law does not, however, provide a general right for shareholders to inspect or obtain copies of any other corporate records.
Subject to the Companies Act, nominations of persons for election to Newco board of directors at an annual general meeting may be made only (a) pursuant to Newco’s notice of meeting (or any supplement thereto), (b) by or at the direction of the Newco board of directors or any committee thereof or (c) as may be provided in the certificate of designation for any class or series of preferred shares or (d) by any Newco shareholder who is a member of record at the time of giving of notice and at the time of the annual general meeting, who shall be entitled to vote at the meeting and who complies with the procedures set forth in Newco bye-laws, and, except as otherwise required by law, any failure to comply with the procedures shall result in the nullification of such nomination.
For nominations to be properly brought before an annual general meeting by a Newco shareholder, the Newco shareholder must have given timely notice thereof in writing to the secretary. To be timely, a Newco shareholder’s notice shall be delivered to, or mailed and received by, the secretary at the principal executive office of Newco as set forth in Newco’s filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission not less than 120 days nor more than 150 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual general meeting; provided, however, that in the event that the date of the annual general meeting is advanced more than 30 days prior to such anniversary date or delayed more than 70 days after such anniversary date then to be timely such notice must be received by Newco no earlier than 120 days prior to such annual meeting and no later than the later of 70 days prior to the date of the meeting or not later than 10 days following the earlier of the date on which notice of the annual general meeting was posted to Members or the day on which public announcement of the date of the annual general meeting was first made by Newco. In no event shall the adjournment or postponement of any annual general meeting, or any announcement thereof, commence a new time period (or extend any time period) for the giving of a Newco shareholder’s notice as described above.
A Newco shareholder ‘s notice to the secretary shall set forth as to each person whom the Newco shareholder proposes to nominate for election or re-election as a director: (a) all information relating to such person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of directors, or is otherwise required, in each case pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act including such person’s written consent to being named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected; and (b) a reasonably detailed description of any compensatory, payment or other financial agreement, arrangement or understanding that such person has with any other person or entity other tha Newco including the amount of any payment or payments received or receivable thereunder, in each case in connection with candidacy or service as a director (a “Third-Party Compensation Arrangement”). In addition the Newco shareholder giving the notice and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the proposal of such nomination is made is required in accordance with the Newco bye-laws to set forth the name and address of such Newco shareholder and any such beneficial owner, for each class or series, the number of shares of Newco that are held of record or are beneficially owned by such Newco shareholder and by any such beneficial owner; a description of any agreement, arrangement or understanding between or among such Newco shareholder and any such beneficial owner, any of their respective affiliates or associates, and any other person or persons (including their names) in connection with the proposal of such nomination; a description of any agreement, arrangement or understanding that has been entered into by or on behalf of, or any other agreement, arrangement or understanding that has been made, the effect or intent of which is to create or mitigate loss to, manage risk or benefit of share price changes for, or increase or decrease the voting power of, such Newco shareholder or any such beneficial owner or any such nominee with respect to Newco’s securities; a representation that the Newco shareholder is a holder of record of shares of Newco entitled to vote at such meeting and intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to bring such nomination or other business before the meeting; a representation as to whether such Newco shareholder or any such beneficial owner intends or is part of a group that intends to (i) deliver a proxy statement and/or form of proxy to holders of at least the percentage of the voting power of Newco’s issued and outstanding shares required to elect each such nominee and/or (ii) otherwise to solicit proxies from Newco shareholders in support of such nomination; any other information relating to such Newco shareholder, beneficial owner, if any, or director nominee that would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement or other filing required to be made in connection with the solicitation of proxies in support of such nominee pursuant to Section 14 of the Exchange Act.
To be eligible to be a nominee for election as a director, the proposed nominee must provide to the secretary in accordance with the applicable time periods prescribed for delivery of notice under the Newco bye-laws: (1) a completed D&O questionnaire containing information regarding the nominee’s background and qualifications and such other information as may reasonably be required by Newco to determine the eligibility of such proposed nominee to serve as a director, (2) a written representation that, unless previously disclosed to Newco, the nominee is not and will not become a party to any voting agreement, arrangement or understanding with any person or entity as to how such nominee, if elected as a director, will vote on any issue or that could interfere with such person’s ability to comply, if elected as a director, with his/her fiduciary duties under applicable law, (3) a written representation and agreement that, unless previously disclosed to Newco, the nominee is not and will not become a party to any Third-Party Compensation Arrangement and (4) a written representation that, if elected as a director, such nominee would be in compliance and will continue to comply with Newco’s corporate governance guidelines as disclosed on the Newco’s website, as amended from time to time.
Nominations of persons for election to Newco board of directors at a special general meeting may be made (a) pursuant to the Newco’s notice of meeting, (b) by or at the direction of the Newco board of directors or any committee thereof (c) as may be provided in the certificate of designation for any class or series of preferred shares or (d) only in the case of a special general meeting requisitioned by any Newco shareholder in compliance with section 74 of the Companies Act (or any successor provision thereto), by the requisitioning Newco shareholder at the giving of advance notice required by the Companies Act. A Newco shareholder’s proposal to nominate a director at any requisitioned special general meeting shall comply with the notice requirements set out above in relation to a Newco shareholder’s proposal to nominate a director at an annual general meeting.
Under the Companies Act, shareholders may, at their own expense (unless the company otherwise resolves) require a company to: (i) give to the shareholders entitled to receive notice of the next annual general meeting notice of any resolution that shareholders can properly propose at that meeting; and/or (ii) circulate to any shareholder entitled to notice of any general meeting a statement (of not more than 1,000 words) in respect of any matter referred to in a proposed resolution or any business to be conducted at that meeting.
The number of shareholders necessary for such a request is either the number of shareholders representing not less than one-twentieth of the total voting rights of all the shareholders having at the date of the request a right to vote at the meeting to which the request relates, or not less than 100 shareholders. Notice of any such intended resolution shall be given, and any statement shall be circulated, to shareholders entitled to have notice of the meeting sent to them by serving a copy of the resolution or statement on each such shareholder in any manner permitted for service of notice of the meeting, and notice of any such resolution shall be given to any other shareholder of the company by giving notice of the general effect of the resolution in any matter permitted for giving him/it notice of meetings of the company.
Newco bye-laws provide that subject to the Companies Act, proposals for other business at an annual general meeting may be made only (a) pursuant to Newco’s notice of meeting (or any supplement thereto), (b) by or at the direction of the Newco board of directors or any committee thereof or (c) as may be provided in the certificate of designation for any class or series of preferred shares or (d) by any Newco shareholder who is a shareholder of record at the time of giving of notice and at the time of the annual general meeting. The notice requirements are those set out above at “Director Nominations by Shareholders” for a director nomination at an annual general meeting. Proposals by shareholders of other business to be conducted at a special general meeting may be made (a) pursuant to the Newco’s notice of meeting, (b) by or at the direction of the Newco board of directors or any committee thereof (c) as may be provided in the certificate of designation for any class or series of preferred shares or (d) only in the case of a special general meeting requisitioned by any Newco shareholder in compliance with section 74 of the Companies Act (or any successor provision thereto), by the requisitioning Newco shareholder at the giving of advance notice required by the Companies Act. A Newco shareholder’s proposal to transact any business at any requisitioned special general meeting shall comply with the notice requirements set out above at “Director Nominations by Shareholders” for a director nomination at an annual general meeting.
Newco’s bye-laws provide that subject to the rights of the holders of any class or series of Newco preferred shares then issued and outstanding, the Newco board of directors shall consist of such number of directors being not less than five directors and not more than eighteen directors as the Newco board of directors may from time to time determine.
Newco’s board of directors will initially consist of 14 directors. The Newco board of directors shall be divided into three classes designated as Class I, Class II and Class III. Each class of directors shall consist, as nearly as possible, of one third of the total number of directors constituting the entire Newco board of directors.
Each director shall serve for a term ending on the date of the third annual general meeting next following the annual general meeting at which such director was elected, PROVIDED, that directors initially designated as Class III Directors shall serve for an initial term ending on the date of the first annual general meeting next following the effectiveness of their designation as Class III Directors, directors initially designated as Class II Directors shall serve for an initial term ending on the date of the second annual general meeting next following the effectiveness of their designation as Class II Directors and directors initially designated as Class I directors shall serve for an initial term ending on the date of the third annual general meeting next following the effectiveness of
their designation as Class I Directors. If the number of directors is changed, any increase or decrease shall be apportioned among the classes so as to maintain the number of directors in each class as nearly equal as possible, and any director of any class elected to fill a vacancy shall hold office for a term that shall coincide with the remaining term of the other directors of that class, but in no case shall a decrease in the number of directors shorten the term of any director then in office. A director shall hold office until the annual general meeting for the year in which his term expires, subject to his office being vacated pursuant to the Newco bye-laws.
A director may be removed, only with cause (meaning wilful misconduct, fraud, gross negligence, embezzlement or a conviction for a criminal offence involving either dishonesty or engaging in conduct which brings the director or Newco into disrepute or which results in material financial detriment to Newco), by the shareholders, provided notice of the shareholders’ meeting convened to remove the director is given to the director. The notice must contain a statement of the intention to remove the director and must be served on the director not less than 14 days before the meeting. The director is entitled to attend the meeting and be heard on the motion for his removal.
Newco’s bye-laws provide that business of the company is to be managed and conducted by the Newco board of directors. Bermuda law permits individual and corporate directors and there is no requirement in the bye-laws or Bermuda law that directors hold any of Newco’s shares. There is also no requirement in the bye-laws or Bermuda law that the directors must retire at a certain age.
A director may, and the Secretary on the requisition of a director shall, at any time summon a Newco board of directors meeting. Directors may participate in any meeting by such telephonic, electronic or other communication facilities or means as permit all persons participating in the meeting to communicate with each other simultaneously and instantaneously, and participation in such a meeting shall constitute presence in person at such meeting; provided, however, that in the sole discretion of directors participating in any meeting of the Newco board of directors (for the avoidance of doubt, including any such meeting of any committee appointed by the Newco board of directors) from Bermuda, a director participating in such meeting from a jurisdiction outside Bermuda may be prohibited from voting or taking certain other actions at any such meeting if, because of such director’s location in a jurisdiction outside Bermuda, such director’s vote or actions might result in any adverse tax, regulatory or legal consequences to the Company, any of its subsidiaries or any member or its affiliates.
The remuneration of the directors is determined by the Newco board of directors and there is no requirement that a specified number or percentage of “independent” directors must approve any such determination. The directors may also be paid all travel, hotel and other expenses properly incurred by them in connection with the business of the company or their duties as directors generally.
A director who discloses a direct or indirect interest in any contract or proposed contract with the company as required by Bermuda law, may to vote in respect of any such contract or proposed contract in which he or she is interested.
Section 98 of the Companies Act provides generally that a Bermuda company may indemnify its directors, officers and auditors against any liability which by virtue of any rule of law would otherwise be imposed on them in respect of any negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust, except in cases where such liability arises from fraud or dishonesty of which such director, officer or auditor may be guilty in relation to the company. Section 98 further provides that a Bermuda company may indemnify its directors, officers and auditors against any liability incurred by them in defending any proceedings, whether civil or criminal, in which judgment is awarded in their favor or in which they are acquitted or granted relief by the Supreme Court of Bermuda pursuant to section 281 of the Companies Act.
Newco’s bye-laws that provide that the company shall indemnify the officers and directors in respect of their actions and omissions, except in respect of their fraud or dishonesty and that the company may advance moneys to a director or officer for expenses incurred in their defense on the condition that the director or officer shall repay the advance if any allegation of fraud or dishonestly in relation to the company is proved against him.
Newco’s bye-laws provide that the shareholders waive all claims or rights of action that they might have, individually or in right of the company, against any of the company’s directors or officers for any act or failure to act in the performance of such director’s or officer’s duties, except in respect of any fraud or dishonesty of such director or officer. Section 98A of the Companies Act permits the company to purchase and maintain insurance for the benefit of any officer or director in respect of any loss or liability attaching to him in respect of any negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust, whether or not the company may otherwise indemnify such officer or director. Newco has purchased and maintains a directors’ and officers’ liability policy for such a purpose].
Newco’s bye-laws also provide that any repeal, alteration, or amendment of the bye-law provisions relating to the indemnification or exculpation of directors or officers or adoption of any provision inconsistent therewith or any modification shall not adversely affect any rights to indemnification or to the advancement of expenses thereunder existing at the time of such repeal, alteration, amendment, adoption or modification with respect to any events, acts or omissions occurring immediately prior to such repeal, alteration, amendment, adoption or modification (regardless of when any proceeding, or part thereof, relating to such event, act or omission arises or is first threatened, commenced or completed).
Newco’s bye-laws provide that the memorandum of association of Newco may be amended by a resolution of the Newco board of directors and by a resolution of the shareholders. Newco’s bye-laws provide that no bye-law shall be rescinded, altered or amended, and no new bye-law shall be made, unless it shall have been approved by a resolution of the Newco board of directors and by a resolution of the shareholders. The Newco bye-law relating to the removal of the chairman of the Newco board of directors or the president and chief executive officer of Newco prior to the third anniversary of the consummation of the amalgamation may not be rescinded, altered or amended and no new bye-law may be made which would have the effect of rescinding, altering or amending the provisions of such bye-law, until the same has been approved by a resolution of the Newco board of directors including the affirmative vote of not less than 75% of the directors then in office excluding the vote of any director who is an officer (other than the office of director of Newco) or employee of Newco or who is directly or indirectly interested in the proposed resolution and by a resolution of the Newco shareholders.
Under Bermuda law, the holders of an aggregate of not less than 20% in par value of the company’s issued share capital or any class thereof have the right to apply to the Supreme Court of Bermuda for an annulment of any amendment of the memorandum of association adopted by shareholders at any general meeting, other than an amendment which alters or reduces a company’s share capital as provided in the Companies Act. Where such an application is made, the amendment becomes effective only to the extent that it is confirmed by the Supreme Court of Bermuda. An application for an annulment of an amendment of the memorandum of association must be made within 21 days after the date on which the resolution altering the company’s memorandum of association is passed and may be made on behalf of persons entitled to make the application by one or more of their number as they may appoint in writing for the purpose. No application may be made by shareholders voting in favor of the amendment.
The amalgamation or merger of a Bermuda company with another company or corporation (other than certain affiliated companies) requires the amalgamation or merger agreement to be approved by the company’s board of directors and by its shareholders. Unless the company’s bye-laws provide otherwise, the approval of 75% of the shareholders voting at such meeting is required to approve the amalgamation or merger agreement, and the quorum for such meeting must be two persons holding or representing more than one-third of the issued shares of the company. The Newco bye-laws provide that a merger or an amalgamation (other than with a wholly-owned subsidiary) must be approved by the affirmative votes of a majority of the votes cast at a general meeting of the shareholders at which the quorum shall be two or more persons present in person and representing in person or by proxy in excess of 50% of all issued and outstanding shares.
A register of holders of the shares will be maintained by Codan Services Limited in Bermuda, and a branch register will be maintained in the United States by [●], who will serve as branch registrar and transfer agent.
Upon consummation of the amalgamation Newco will be designated by the Bermuda Monetary Authority as a non-resident for Bermuda exchange control purposes. This designation allows the company to engage in transactions in currencies other than the Bermuda dollar, and there puts no restrictions on its ability to transfer funds (other than funds denominated in Bermuda dollars) in and out of Bermuda or to pay dividends to United States residents who are holders of Newco’s shares.
In accordance with Bermuda law, share certificates are only issued in the names of companies, partnerships or individuals. In the case of a shareholder acting in a special capacity (for example as a trustee), certificates may, at the request of the shareholder, record the capacity in which the shareholder is acting. Notwithstanding such recording of any special capacity, we are not bound to investigate or see to the execution of any such trust. We will take no notice of any trust applicable to any of the shares, whether or not the company has been notified of such trust.
Newco is under no obligation to complete and deliver a share certificate unless specifically called upon to do so by the person to whom the shares have been allotted.
Newco’s bye-laws provide that every shareholder shall be entitled to a certificate under the common seal of the Company (or a facsimile thereof) or bearing the signature (or a facsimile thereof) of a director or the secretary or a person expressly authorized to sign specifying the number and, where appropriate, the class of shares held by such shareholder and whether the same are fully paid up and, if not, specifying the amount paid on such shares.
Newco intends to list its shares on NYSE.
From time to time, one or more of PartnerRe’s subsidiaries have entered into reinsurance contracts with the subsidiaries of AXIS in the ordinary course of business on an arms’ length basis. PartnerRe’s subsidiaries write a total of approximately 40 in force reinsurance contracts with AXIS. These contracts generated ceded premiums of $57,349,676 in 2014. All of these contracts have expiration dates in 2015.
The two largest reinsurance contracts cover directors and officers risks for all of AXIS’ subsidiaries globally (except for Bermuda), generating ceded premiums of $26,327,735 in 2014, also cover excess casualty risks of AXIS’ US subsidiaries, and generating ceded premiums of $14,600,117 in 2014.
The remaining reinsurance contracts include facultative certificates covering specific property risks and reinsurance treaties covering a variety of risks including specialty and professional lines, umbrella and excess risks and auto liability.
From time to time, one or more of AXIS’ subsidiaries has entered into reinsurance contracts with subsidiaries of PartnerRe in the ordinary course of business on an arms’ length basis. AXIS’ subsidiaries write a total of four in force reinsurance contracts with PartnerRe covering motor risks. All of the reinsurance contracts will expire March 31, 2015. All such reinsurance contracts are not material to the business of either AXIS or PartnerRe.
The information appearing under the heading “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence” in PartnerRe’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 26, 2015 is hereby incorporated by reference as though it were set forth in full hereunder. See the section of this joint proxy/prospectus titled “Where You Can Find More Information.”
The information appearing under the heading “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence” in AXIS’ Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 23, 2015 is hereby incorporated by reference as though it were set forth in full hereunder. See the section of this joint proxy/prospectus titled “Where You Can Find More Information.”
Conyers Dill & Pearman Limited has provided to Newco an opinion regarding the validity of the Newco common shares to be issued pursuant to the amalgamation. Certain U.S. federal income tax matters relating to the amalgamation have been passed upon for PartnerRe by Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, and for AXIS by Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP.
The financial statements, and the related financial statement schedules, incorporated in this joint proxy statement/prospectus by reference from PartnerRe’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, and the effectiveness of PartnerRe’s internal control over financial reporting have been audited by Deloitte Ltd., an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their reports, which are incorporated herein by reference. Such financial statements and financial statement schedules have been so incorporated in reliance upon the reports of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.
The financial statements, and the related financial statement schedules, incorporated in this joint proxy statement/prospectus by reference from AXIS’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, and the effectiveness of AXIS’ internal control over financial reporting have been audited by Deloitte Ltd., an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their reports, which are incorporated herein by reference. Such financial statements and financial statement schedules have been so incorporated in reliance upon the reports of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.
UNITED STATES FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS
PartnerRe is a Bermuda exempted limited liability company. In addition, certain of its directors and officers, as well as certain of its experts named in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, reside outside the United States, and all or a substantial portion of PartnerRe’s assets and their assets are located outside the United States. Therefore, it may be difficult for investors to effect service of process within the United States upon those persons or to recover against PartnerRe or those persons on judgments of courts in the United States, including judgments based on civil liabilities provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws. However, investors may serve PartnerRe with process in the United States with respect to actions against PartnerRe arising out of or in connection with the U.S. federal securities laws relating to offers and sales of the securities covered by this joint proxy statement/prospectus by serving PartnerRe U.S. Corporation, its U.S. agent irrevocably appointed for that purpose.
AXIS is a Bermuda exempted limited liability company. In addition, certain of its directors and officers, as well as certain of its experts named in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, reside outside the United States, and all or a substantial portion of AXIS’ assets and their assets are located outside the United States. Therefore, it may be difficult for investors to effect service of process within the United States upon those persons or to recover against AXIS or those persons on judgments of courts in the United States, including judgments based on civil liabilities provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws. However, investors may serve AXIS with process in the United States with respect to actions against AXIS arising out of or in connection with the U.S. federal securities laws relating to offers and sales of the securities covered by this joint proxy statement/prospectus by serving CT Corporation, 111 Eighth Avenue, 13th Floor, New York, NY 10011, its U.S. agent irrevocably appointed for that purpose.
YOU SHOULD RELY ONLY ON THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN OR INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO THIS JOINT PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS. NONE OF PARTNERRE OR AXIS HAS AUTHORIZED ANYONE ELSE TO PROVIDE YOU WITH DIFFERENT INFORMATION. NEWCO IS OFFERING THESE SECURITIES ONLY IN JURISDICTIONS WHERE THE OFFER IS PERMITTED. YOU SHOULD NOT ASSUME THAT THE INFORMATION IN THIS JOINT PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS OR ANY SUPPLEMENT IS ACCURATE AS OF ANY DATE OTHER THAN THE DATE ON THE FRONT OF THOSE DOCUMENTS. NEWCO’S BUSINESS, FINANCIAL CONDITION, RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND PROSPECTS MAY HAVE CHANGED SINCE THAT DATE.
Each of PartnerRe and AXIS will bear its own costs of soliciting proxies. Solicitation will be made by mail, and may be made by directors, officers and employees, personally or by telephone or e-mail. Proxy cards and materials also will be distributed to beneficial owners of PartnerRe common shares and AXIS common shares through brokers, custodians, nominees and other parties, and each of PartnerRe and AXIS expects to reimburse such parties for their respective charges and expenses. PartnerRe has retained Georgeson Inc. to assist in the solicitation of PartnerRe proxies at a fee not expected to exceed $[●], plus reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses, including phone calls and services relating to reimbursement of banks and brokers. AXIS has retained MacKenzie Partners, Inc. to assist in the solicitation of AXIS proxies at a fee not expected to exceed $[●], plus reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses, including phone calls and services relating to reimbursement of banks and brokers.
The PartnerRe board of directors has set [●], 2015 as the date for the 2015 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders. The deadline for submission of shareholder proposals intended to be presented at the 2015 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of PartnerRe is [●], 2015. If proxy materials are required to be delivered and consummation of the amalgamation does not occur, shareholder proposals intended to be presented at the 2015 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of PartnerRe must be received by the Secretary of PartnerRe for inclusion in the proxy materials for this meeting on or before the date specified in the proxy materials delivered in connection with the 2015 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders.
The AXIS board of directors has set [●], 2015 as the date for the 2015 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders. The deadline for submission of shareholder proposals intended to be presented at the 2015 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of AXIS is [●], 2015. If proxy materials are required to be delivered and consummation of the amalgamation does not occur, shareholder proposals intended to be presented at the 2015 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of AXIS must be received by the Secretary of AXIS for inclusion in the proxy materials for this meeting on or before the date specified in the proxy materials delivered in connection with the 2015 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders.
As of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, neither the PartnerRe nor AXIS board of directors knows of any specific matter to be brought before their respective special general meeting that is not referred to in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. If any other matter properly comes before the special general meeting, including any other matter in furtherance of or incidental to any matter referred to in this joint proxy statement/prospectus or any shareholder proposal properly made, the persons named in the accompanying proxy will have authority to vote such proxy in their discretion on such business.
The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries such as brokers to satisfy delivery requirements for proxy statements and annual reports with respect to two or more shareholders sharing the same address by delivering a single proxy statement or annual report, as applicable, addressed to those shareholders. As permitted by the Exchange Act, only one copy of this joint proxy statement/prospectus is being delivered to shareholders residing at the same address, unless shareholders have notified the company whose shares they hold of their desire to receive multiple copies of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. This process, which is commonly referred to as “householding,” potentially provides extra convenience for shareholders and cost savings for companies.
If, at any time, you no longer wish to participate in householding and would prefer to receive a separate joint proxy statement/prospectus, or if you are receiving multiple copies of this joint proxy statement/prospectus and wish to receive only one, please contact the company whose shares you hold at its address identified below. Each of
PartnerRe and AXIS will promptly deliver, upon oral or written request, a separate copy of this joint proxy statement/prospectus to any shareholder residing at an address to which only one copy was mailed. Requests for additional copies should be directed to either PartnerRe or AXIS at its respective address below.
PartnerRe and AXIS have filed a registration statement on Form S-4 to register with the SEC the Newco common shares to be issued to PartnerRe and AXIS shareholders in the amalgamation, if the amalgamation is approved. This joint proxy statement/prospectus is a part of that registration statement and constitutes a prospectus of PartnerRe and AXIS in addition to being a proxy statement of PartnerRe and AXIS. As allowed by SEC rules, this joint proxy statement/prospectus does not contain all the information you can find in the registration statement on Form S-4, of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus forms a part, or the annexes to the registration statement. PartnerRe and AXIS both file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy any reports, statements or other information that PartnerRe or AXIS file with the SEC at the SEC’s public reference room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the operation of the public reference room. These SEC filings are also available to the public from the Internet website maintained by the SEC at http://www.sec.gov.
If you are a PartnerRe or AXIS shareholder, some of the documents previously filed with the SEC may have been sent to you, but you can also obtain any of them through the appropriate company, the SEC or the SEC’s Internet website as described above. Documents filed with the SEC are available from the appropriate company without charge, excluding all exhibits, except that, if PartnerRe or AXIS has specifically incorporated by reference an exhibit in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, the exhibit will also be provided without charge.
You may obtain documents filed by the appropriate company with the SEC by requesting them in writing or by telephone from the following addresses:
PARTNERRE LTD.
Attn: Secretary and Corporate Counsel
90 Pitts Bay Road
Pembroke
HM 19 Bermuda
(441) 292-0888
AXIS CAPITAL HOLDINGS LIMITED
Attn: Corporate Secretary and General Counsel
92 Pitts Bay Road
Pembroke
HM 08 Bermuda
(441) 496-2600
If you would like to request documents, in order to ensure timely delivery, you must do so at least five business days before the date of the applicable special general meeting. This means you must request this information no later than [·] if you are a PartnerRe shareholder and no later than [·] if you are an AXIS shareholder. PartnerRe and AXIS will mail promptly requested documents to requesting shareholders by first-class mail, or another equally prompt means.
You can also get more information by visiting PartnerRe’s website at www.partnerre.com and by visiting AXIS’ website at www.axiscapital.com.
Materials from this website and other websites mentioned in this joint proxy statement/prospectus are not incorporated by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus. If you are viewing this joint proxy statement/prospectus in electronic format, each of the URLs mentioned in this joint proxy statement/prospectus is an active textual reference only.
The SEC allows PartnerRe and AXIS to “incorporate by reference” information in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, which means that PartnerRe and AXIS can disclose important information to you by referring you to another document filed separately with the SEC. The information incorporated by reference is considered to
be a part of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, except for any information that is superseded by information included directly in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
The documents listed below that PartnerRe and AXIS have previously filed with the SEC are considered to be a part of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. They contain important business and financial information about PartnerRe and AXIS:
PartnerRe Filings (File No. 001-14536) | | |
| | |
Annual Report on Form 10-K | | For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, filed with the SEC on: February 26, 2015. |
| | |
Current Reports on Form 8-K | | Filed with the SEC on: March 11, 2015, February 17, 2015, February 4, 2015, January 30, 2015, January 29, 2015 and January 26, 2015 (other than the portions of those documents not deemed to be filed). |
| | |
The description of PartnerRe common shares contained in its Registration Statement on Form S-3, as amended or supplemented for the purpose of updating the description | | Filed with the SEC on: April 9, 2012. |
| | |
AXIS Filings (File No. 001-31721) | | |
| | |
Annual Report on Form 10-K | | For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, filed with the SEC on February 23, 2015. |
| | |
Current Reports on Form 8-K | | Filed with the SEC on: March 11, 2015, February 4, 2015 and January 29, 2015 (other than the portions of those documents not deemed to be filed). |
| | |
The description of AXIS common shares contained in its Registration Statement on Form S-3, as amended or supplemented for the purpose of updating the description | | Filed with the SEC on: January 16, 2014. |
Each of PartnerRe and AXIS also hereby incorporates by reference any additional documents that PartnerRe and AXIS may file with the SEC pursuant to Section 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act from the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus to the date of the special general meeting. Nothing in this joint proxy statement/prospectus shall be deemed to incorporate information furnished but not filed with the SEC.
PartnerRe has supplied all of the information contained or incorporated by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus relating to PartnerRe, as well as information underlying the unaudited pro forma financial information, and AXIS has supplied all of the information contained or incorporated by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus relating to AXIS, as well as information underlying the unaudited pro forma financial information. This joint proxy statement/prospectus constitutes a prospectus of Newco and a proxy statement of PartnerRe and AXIS.
In the event of conflicting information in this joint proxy statement/prospectus in comparison to any document incorporated by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus, or among documents incorporated by reference, the information in the latest filed document controls.
YOU SHOULD RELY ONLY ON THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN OR INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO THIS JOINT PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS IN DECIDING HOW TO VOTE YOUR PARTNERRE OR AXIS COMMON SHARES. PARTNERRE AND AXIS HAVE NOT AUTHORIZED ANYONE TO PROVIDE YOU WITH INFORMATION THAT DIFFERS FROM THAT CONTAINED IN THIS JOINT PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS. THIS
JOINT PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS. THIS JOINT PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS IS DATED [●], 2015. YOU SHOULD NOT ASSUME THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS JOINT PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS IS ACCURATE AS OF ANY DATE OTHER THAN THAT DATE, AND NEITHER THE MAILING OF THIS JOINT PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS TO PARTNERRE OR AXIS SHAREHOLDERS NOR THE ISSUANCE OF NEWCO COMMON SHARES SHALL CREATE ANY IMPLICATION TO THE CONTRARY.
This joint proxy statement/prospectus contains a description of the representations and warranties that each of PartnerRe and AXIS made to the other in the amalgamation agreement. Representations and warranties made by PartnerRe, AXIS and other applicable parties are also set forth in contracts and other documents (including the amalgamation agreement) that are attached or filed as Annexes to this joint proxy statement/prospectus or are incorporated by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus. These materials are included or incorporated by reference only to provide you with information regarding the terms and conditions of the agreements, and not to provide any other factual information regarding PartnerRe, AXIS or their respective businesses. Accordingly, the representations and warranties and other provisions of the amalgamation agreement should not be read alone, but instead should be read only in conjunction with the other information provided elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus or incorporated by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
COMPOSITE COPY
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF AMALGAMATION
BY AND BETWEEN
AXIS CAPITAL HOLDINGS LIMITED
AND
PARTNERRE LTD.
Dated as of January 25, 2015 (as subsequently amended)
ARTICLE I THE AMALGAMATION | 1 |
| 1.1 | The Amalgamation; Effective Time | 1 |
| 1.2 | Closing | 2 |
| 1.3 | Effects of the Amalgamation | 2 |
| 1.4 | Amalgamated Company Memorandum of Association and Bye-laws | 2 |
| 1.5 | Governance; Directors and Officers of Axis. | 2 |
| |
ARTICLE II CONVERSION OF SECURITIES | 3 |
| 2.1 | Effect on Share Capital | 3 |
| 2.2 | Exchange Procedures | 6 |
| 2.3 | Treatment of Equity Awards | 10 |
| 2.4 | Amendment of Structure | 13 |
| |
ARTICLE III REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE PARTIES | 13 |
| 3.1 | Organization, Standing and Power | 13 |
| 3.2 | Capitalization | 14 |
| 3.3 | Corporate Authorization | 15 |
| 3.4 | Board Approval | 16 |
| 3.5 | Enforceability | 16 |
| 3.6 | Non-Contravention | 16 |
| 3.7 | Subsidiaries | 17 |
| 3.8 | Governmental Authorizations | 18 |
| 3.9 | Vote Required | 19 |
| 3.10 | SEC Reports | 19 |
| 3.11 | Financial Statements; Internal Controls | 20 |
| 3.12 | Liabilities | 21 |
| 3.13 | Absence of Certain Changes | 21 |
| 3.14 | Litigation | 22 |
| 3.15 | Investments; Derivatives | 22 |
| 3.16 | Insurance Matters | 22 |
| 3.17 | Material Contracts | 24 |
| 3.18 | Benefit Plans | 26 |
| 3.19 | Labor Relations | 28 |
| 3.20 | Taxes | 28 |
| 3.21 | Intellectual Property | 30 |
| 3.22 | Real Property; Personal Property | 31 |
| 3.23 | Permits; Compliance with Laws | 32 |
| 3.24 | Takeover Statutes | 33 |
| 3.25 | Interested Party Transactions | 33 |
| 3.26 | Reserves | 33 |
| 3.27 | Insurance Policies | 34 |
| 3.28 | Registration Statement; Joint Proxy Statement | 34 |
| 3.29 | Opinion of Financial Advisor | 34 |
| 3.30 | Brokers or Finders | 35 |
| 3.31 | Reorganization | 35 |
| 3.32 | Environmental Matters | 35 |
| 3.33 | No Other Representations or Warranties | 36 |
| |
ARTICLE IV MUTUAL COVENANTS OF THE PARTIES | 36 |
| 4.1 | Preparation of Proxy Statement; Shareholder Meetings | 36 |
| 4.2 | Access to Information; Confidentiality | 38 |
| 4.3 | Filings; Reasonable Best Efforts; Notification | 39 |
| 4.4 | Tax-Free Treatment | 40 |
| 4.5 | Public Announcements | 40 |
| 4.6 | Section 16 Matters | 40 |
| 4.7 | Notification of Certain Matters | 41 |
| |
ARTICLE V ADDITIONAL COVENANTS OF THE PARTIES | 41 |
| 5.1 | Conduct of Operations of Axis and PRE. | 41 |
| 5.2 | Bermuda Required Actions | 45 |
| 5.3 | Indemnification; Directors’ and Officers’ Insurance | 45 |
| 5.4 | NYSE Listing | 46 |
| 5.5 | Employees and Employee Benefits | 46 |
| 5.6 | Stock Exchange Delisting | 47 |
| 5.7 | Financing. | 47 |
| 5.8 | Acquisition Proposals | 47 |
| 5.9 | Approvals | 50 |
| |
ARTICLE VI CONDITIONS | 51 |
| 6.1 | Conditions to the Obligations of Each Party | 51 |
| 6.2 | Conditions to Obligations of PRE. | 51 |
| 6.3 | Conditions to Obligations of Axis. | 52 |
| |
ARTICLE VII TERMINATION AND AMENDMENT | 54 |
| 7.1 | Termination | 54 |
| 7.2 | Effect of Termination | 55 |
| 7.3 | Amendment | 58 |
| 7.4 | Extension; Waiver | 58 |
| |
ARTICLE VIII MISCELLANEOUS | 58 |
| 8.1 | Survival of Representations and Warranties | 58 |
| 8.2 | Notices | 58 |
| 8.3 | Interpretation | 59 |
| 8.4 | Counterparts | 60 |
| 8.5 | Entire Agreement | 61 |
| 8.6 | Severability | 61 |
| 8.7 | Third-Party Beneficiaries | 61 |
| 8.8 | Governing Law | 61 |
| 8.9 | Consent to Jurisdiction; Venue | 61 |
| 8.10 | Specific Performance | 62 |
| 8.11 | Assignment | 62 |
| 8.12 | Expenses | 62 |
| 8.13 | Defined Terms | 62 |
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF AMALGAMATION
This Agreement and Plan of Amalgamation (this “Agreement”) is made and entered into as of January 25, 2015 (as subsequently amended), by and between Axis Capital Holdings Limited, a Bermuda exempted company (“Axis”) and PartnerRe Ltd., a Bermuda exempted company (“PRE” and, together with Axis, the “parties”).
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Axis (the “Axis Board”) and the Board of Directors of PRE (the “PRE Board”) have determined that a business combination between Axis and PRE presents the opportunity for their respective companies to achieve long-term financial and strategic benefits and accordingly have determined to effect a business combination upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement;
WHEREAS, it is proposed that PRE and Axis will amalgamate (the “Amalgamation”) and continue as a Bermuda exempted company (the “Amalgamated Company”), upon the terms and subject to the conditions of this Agreement and a statutory amalgamation agreement in a form to be agreed between the parties (the “Amalgamation Agreement”), and in accordance with the Companies Act 1981 of Bermuda, as amended (the “Companies Act”);
WHEREAS, the Axis Board and the PRE Board have unanimously: (i) determined that the Amalgamation is advisable and fair to, and in the best interests of, Axis and PRE, respectively; and (ii) approved and adopted this Agreement, the Amalgamation Agreement and the Transactions; and
WHEREAS, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the parties intend that the Amalgamation will constitute a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) and the regulations thereunder (the “Treasury Regulations”), and that this Agreement be, and be hereby adopted as, a “plan of reorganization” for purposes of Section 368 of the Code and the Treasury Regulations thereunder.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these premises and the representations, warranties, covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement, the parties, intending to be legally bound, agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
THE AMALGAMATION
1.1 The Amalgamation; Effective Time. Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement and the Amalgamation Agreement, Axis and PRE will cause an application for registration of the Amalgamated Company (the “Amalgamation Application”) to be prepared, executed and delivered to the Registrar of Companies in Bermuda (the “Registrar”) as provided under S.108 of the Companies Act on or prior to the Closing Date and will cause the Amalgamation to become effective pursuant to the Companies Act. The
Amalgamation shall become effective upon the issuance of a certificate of amalgamation (the “Certificate of Amalgamation”) by the Registrar or such other time as the Certificate of Amalgamation may provide. The parties agree that they will request the Registrar provide in the Certificate of Amalgamation that the Effective Time will be 9:00 a.m., New York City time, on the Closing Date (the “Effective Time”).
1.2 Closing. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the closing of the Amalgamation (the “Closing”) will take place at the offices of Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, 425 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York, at 8:00 a.m., New York City time, on the date (the “Closing Date”) that is the third Business Day after the day on which the last of those conditions (other than any conditions set forth in Article VI that by their nature are to be satisfied at the Closing, but subject to the satisfaction or waiver of those conditions) is satisfied or waived in accordance with this Agreement, or at such other place and time or on such other date as Axis and PRE may agree in writing.
1.3 Effects of the Amalgamation. As of the Effective Time, subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the Amalgamation Agreement, Axis shall be amalgamated with PRE and the Amalgamated Company shall continue after the Amalgamation. The parties acknowledge and agree that for purposes of Bermuda Law: (i) the Amalgamation shall be effected so as to constitute an “amalgamation” in accordance with S.104 of the Companies Act, and (ii) the Amalgamated Company shall be deemed to be an “amalgamated company” as such term is understood under the Companies Act. Under the Companies Act, from and after the Effective Time: (a) the Amalgamation of Axis and PRE and their continuance as one company shall become effective; (b) the property of each of Axis and PRE shall become the property of Amalgamated Company; (c) Amalgamated Company shall continue to be liable for the obligations and liabilities of each of Axis and PRE; (d) any existing cause of action, claim or liability to prosecution shall be unaffected; (e) a civil, criminal or administrative action or proceeding pending by or against Axis or PRE may be continued to be prosecuted by or against Amalgamated Company; and (f) a conviction against, or ruling, order or judgment in favor of or against, Axis or PRE may be enforced by or against Amalgamated Company.
1.4 Amalgamated Company Memorandum of Association and Bye-laws. The memorandum of association and the bye-laws of the Amalgamated Company (respectively, the “Amalgamated Company Memorandum of Association” and the “Amalgamated Company Bye-Laws”) shall be in the form to be mutually agreed by Axis and PRE no later than the mailing of the Joint Proxy Statement , which shall contain the terms set forth on Section 1.4 of each party’s Disclosure Letter (as each may thereafter be amended or modified from time to time after the date hereof and prior to the mailing of the Joint Proxy Statement by the mutual written agreement of the parties).
1.5 Governance; Directors and Officers of Axis.
(a) The parties shall take all actions necessary to cause the number of directors constituting the full Amalgamated Company board of directors (the “Amalgamated Company Board”) as of the Effective Time to be 14 and comprised of: (i) seven directors designated by Axis prior to the Closing (the “Axis Board Designees”) provided, that, one such Axis Board Designee shall be Albert Benchimol and (ii) seven directors designated by PRE (the
“PRE Board Designees”), provided, that, one such PRE Board Designee shall be Jean-Paul Montupet (such directors, collectively, the “Post-Closing Directors”). The Post-Closing Directors will serve until the earlier of their resignation or removal or until their respective successors are duly elected or appointed in accordance with the Bye-Laws of the Amalgamated Company.
(b) The parties shall take all actions reasonably necessary so that, immediately after the Effective Time, the Amalgamated Company Board shall designate the following six committees: (i) Audit, (ii) Risk, (iii) Nominating and Corporate Governance, (iv) Finance; (v) Compensation and (vi) Executive. Each committee of the Amalgamated Company Board shall be composed of Post-Closing Directors drawn equally from the Axis Board Designees and PRE Board Designees who shall serve until the earlier of their resignation or removal or until their respective successors are duly elected or appointed or such other time that the Amalgamated Company Board after the Closing determines to reconstitute or eliminate such committee, in each case in accordance with the Bye-Laws of the Amalgamated Company. At the Effective Time, the initial chairpersons of the Risk, Nominating and Corporate Governance and Compensation committees of the Amalgamated Company Board shall have been designated by the Axis Board in its sole discretion and the chairpersons of the Audit, Finance and Executive committees of the Amalgamated Company Board shall have been designated by the PRE Board in its sole discretion, all such initial chairpersons to serve until the earlier of their resignation or removal or until their respective successors are duly elected or appointed or such other time that the Amalgamated Company Board after the Closing determines to reconstitute or eliminate such committee, in each case in accordance with the Bye-Laws of the Amalgamated Company.
(c) The parties shall take all actions necessary so that immediately after the Effective Time: (i) Albert Benchimol shall be appointed as the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Amalgamated Company to serve until the earlier of his resignation or removal in accordance with the Bye-Laws of the Amalgamated Company, (ii) Jean-Paul Montupet shall be elected as the chairman of the Amalgamated Company Board to serve until the earlier of his resignation or removal in accordance with the Bye-Laws of the Amalgamated Company and (iii) the Bye-Laws of the Amalgamated Company shall provide (x) that until the third (3rd) anniversary of the Closing, the affirmative vote of 75% of the then Amalgamated Company Board (excluding interested directors, employees and officers of the Amalgamated Company) will be required to remove Mr. Benchimol or Mr. Montupet from such roles (y) that any amendments to the provisions described in (x) above shall require the affirmative vote of 75% of the then Amalgamated Company Board (excluding interested directors, employees and officers of the Amalgamated Company) and (z) for a staggered board.
ARTICLE II
CONVERSION OF SECURITIES
2.1 Effect on Share Capital. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, at the Effective Time, by virtue of the Amalgamation and without any action on the part of the holders of any share capital of Axis or PRE:
(a) Cancellation of Treasury Shares. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, each common share of: (i) PRE, par value $1.00 per share (a “PRE Common Share”) that is owned by PRE, Axis or by any respective Subsidiary of PRE or Axis immediately prior to the Effective Time and (ii) Axis, par value $0.0125 per share (an “Axis Common Share”) that is owned by PRE, Axis or by any respective Subsidiary of PRE or Axis immediately prior to the Effective Time (other than any PRE Common Shares held by a wholly owned Subsidiary of PRE or Axis Common Shares held by a wholly owned Subsidiary of Axis) (collectively (i) and (ii), the “Excluded Shares”) shall, by virtue of the Amalgamation and without any action on the part of the holder thereof, be cancelled and shall cease to exist, and no PRE Consideration or Axis Consideration shall be delivered in respect of the Excluded Shares.
(b) Conversion of PRE Common Shares. Each PRE Common Share issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (other than the Excluded Shares) shall automatically be cancelled and converted into the right to receive 2.18 (the “PRE Exchange Ratio”) validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable common shares of the Amalgamated Company, par value $0.0125 per share (each, an “Amalgamated Company Common Share”), together with any cash paid in lieu of fractional shares in accordance with Section 2.2(g) (collectively, the “PRE Consideration”). As of the Effective Time, all PRE Common Shares shall be cancelled automatically and shall cease to exist and the holders of PRE Common Shares (the “PRE Shareholders”) shall cease to have any rights with respect to such PRE Common Shares, except: (i) in the case of the PRE Common Shares (other than Excluded Shares), the right to receive the PRE Consideration in accordance with Section 2.2, and (ii) in the case of the PRE Dissenting Shares that are PRE Common Shares, the right to receive the excess, if any, of the fair value thereof as determined in accordance with (and subject to the terms and conditions of) Section 2.1(f) over the PRE Consideration.
(c) Conversion of Axis Common Shares. Each Axis Common Share issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (other than the Excluded Shares) shall automatically be cancelled and converted into the right to receive one Amalgamated Company Common Share (the “Axis Exchange Ratio”), together with any cash paid in lieu of fractional shares in accordance with Section 2.2(g) (collectively, the “Axis Consideration”). As of the Effective Time, all Axis Common Shares shall be canceled automatically and shall cease to exist and the holders of Axis Common Shares (the “Axis Shareholders”) shall cease to have any rights with respect to such Axis Common Shares, except: (i) in the case of the Axis Common Shares (other than the Excluded Shares), the right to receive the Axis Consideration in accordance with Section 2.2, and (ii) in the case of the Axis Dissenting Shares that are Axis Common Shares, the additional right to receive the excess, if any, of the fair value thereof as determined in accordance with (and subject to the terms and conditions of) Section 2.1(e) over the Axis Consideration.
(d) Certain Adjustments. The Axis Consideration and the PRE Consideration (collectively, the “Consideration”) shall be appropriately adjusted to reflect fully and equitably the effect of any share split, reverse share split, share consolidation, share subdivision, share bonus issue, share dividend (including any dividend or similar distribution of securities convertible into Axis Common Shares or PRE Common Shares, as the case may be), reorganization, recapitalization, reclassification or other similar event that occurs between the date of this Agreement and the Effective Time with respect to Axis Common Shares or PRE Common Shares in order to provide the Axis Shareholders and the PRE Shareholders with the
same economic effect as contemplated by this Agreement and the Amalgamation Agreement prior to any such event; provided, that, nothing in this Section 2.1(d) shall be construed to permit PRE or Axis to take any action with respect to its securities that is prohibited by the terms of this Agreement or the Amalgamation Agreement.
(e) Shares of Axis Dissenting Holders. At the Effective Time any Axis Dissenting Shares shall be cancelled, and unless otherwise required by applicable Law, be converted into the right to receive the Axis Consideration as described in Section 2.1(c) or, as the case may be, the preferred shares of the Amalgamated Company described in Section 2.1(g) and any Axis Dissenting Holders, in the event that the fair value of an Axis Dissenting Share as appraised by the Supreme Court of Bermuda, under Section 106(6) of the Companies Act (the “Appraised Fair Value”) is greater than the Axis Consideration or, as the case may be, the value of their preferred shares of the Amalgamated Company described in Section 2.1(g), be entitled to receive such difference from the Amalgamated Company by payment within thirty (30) days after such Appraised Fair Value is finally determined pursuant to such appraisal procedure. Axis shall give PRE: (i) prompt notice of (A) any demands for appraisal of Axis Dissenting Shares or withdrawals of such demands received by Axis and (B) to the extent that Axis has Knowledge, any applications to the Supreme Court of Bermuda for appraisal of the fair value of the Axis Dissenting Shares and (ii) to the extent permitted by applicable Law, the opportunity to participate with Axis in, and to be regularly consulted by Axis with respect to, any settlement negotiations and proceedings with respect to any written demands for appraisal under the Companies Act. Neither PRE nor Axis shall, without the prior written consent of the other party (such written consent not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed), voluntarily make any payment with respect to, or settle, or offer to settle, any demands or applications for appraisal pursuant to this Article II.
(f) Shares of PRE Dissenting Holders. At the Effective Time any PRE Dissenting Shares shall be cancelled, and unless otherwise required by applicable Law, be converted into the right to receive the PRE Consideration as described in Section 2.1(b) or, as the case may be, the preference shares of the Amalgamated Company as described in Section 2.1(g) and any PRE Dissenting Holders, in the event that the Appraised Fair Value of a PRE Dissenting Share is greater than the PRE Consideration or, as the case may be, the value of their preferred shares of the Amalgamated Company described in Section 2.1(g), be entitled to receive such difference from the Amalgamated Company by payment within thirty (30) days after such Appraised Fair Value is finally determined pursuant to such appraisal procedure. PRE shall give Axis: (i) prompt notice of (A) any demands for appraisal of PRE Dissenting Shares or withdrawals of such demands received by PRE and (B) to the extent that PRE has Knowledge, any applications to the Supreme Court of Bermuda for appraisal of the fair value of the PRE Dissenting Shares and (ii) to the extent permitted by applicable Law, the opportunity to participate with PRE in, and to be regularly consulted by PRE with respect to, any settlement negotiations and proceedings with respect to any written demands for appraisal under the Companies Act.
(g) Preferred Shares. Each share of the PRE Preferred Shares and Axis Preferred Shares issued and outstanding at the Effective Time shall remain outstanding as preferred shares of the Amalgamated Company and shall be entitled to the same dividend and other relative rights, preferences, limitations and restrictions as are now provided by the
respective certificate of designation, preferences and rights of such PRE Preferred Shares or Axis Preferred Shares, respectively.
2.2 Exchange Procedures.
(a) Exchange Agent. At least five Business Days prior to the Effective Time, Axis and PRE shall jointly designate an exchange agent (the “Exchange Agent”) for the purpose of: (i) exchanging share certificates registered in the name of a PRE Shareholder and representing PRE Common Shares (each, a “PRE Certificate”) or PRE Common Shares registered in the register of shareholders of PRE (the “PRE Share Register”) outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (“Uncertificated PRE Common Shares”), and (ii) exchanging share certificates registered in the name of an Axis Shareholder and representing Axis Common Shares (each, an “Axis Certificate”) or Axis Common Shares registered in the register of shareholders of Axis (the “Axis Share Register”) outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (“Uncertificated Axis Common Shares”).
(b) Exchange Fund. At or as soon as reasonably practicable following the Effective Time, the Amalgamated Company shall deposit, or shall cause to be deposited, with the Exchange Agent in accordance with this Article II certificates or shares in book-entry form representing an aggregate number of Amalgamated Company Common Shares to be exchanged in the Amalgamation pursuant to Sections 2.1(b) and 2.1(c). As may be necessary from time to time following the Effective Time, the Amalgamated Company shall deposit, or cause to be deposited, with the Exchange Agent any dividends or distributions to which the PRE Shareholders and the Axis Shareholders may be entitled pursuant to Section 2.2(e) in an amount sufficient to pay such dividends or distributions. Such Axis Consideration, PRE Consideration and other amounts so deposited pursuant to this Section 2.2(b) are hereinafter referred to as the “Exchange Fund.” No interest shall be paid or accrued for the benefit of the respective holders of the PRE Certificates, Uncertificated PRE Common Shares, Axis Certificates or Uncertificated Axis Common Shares on cash amounts payable from the Exchange Fund pursuant to this Section 2.2.
(c) Investment of Exchange Fund. The Exchange Agent shall invest any cash in the Exchange Fund as directed by the Amalgamated Company; provided that such investments shall be in either direct obligations of, or fully guaranteed by, the United States of America or in money market funds having a rating in the highest investment category granted by an internationally recognized credit rating agency at the time of investment. Any interest and other income resulting from such investments shall be promptly paid to the Amalgamated Company and any amounts in excess of the amounts payable under Sections 2.1(b) and (c) shall be promptly returned to the Amalgamated Company. To the extent that there are any losses with respect to any such investments, or such cash in the Exchange Fund diminishes for any reason below the level required for the Exchange Agent to make prompt cash payment of amounts under Sections 2.2(e) and(g), the Amalgamated Company shall promptly replace or restore the cash to the Exchange Fund so as to ensure that there is sufficient cash for the Exchange Agent to make all such payments.
(d) Exchange Procedures. As promptly as practicable (but in no event later than five Business Days) following the Effective Time, the Amalgamated Company shall cause
the Exchange Agent to mail to: (1) each PRE Shareholder of record of PRE Common Shares converted pursuant to Section 2.1(b): (i) a letter of transmittal (which shall be in form and substance as the parties may reasonably specify at least three Business Days prior to the Effective Time, including that delivery shall be effective upon the proper delivery of the PRE Certificates or, in the case of Uncertificated PRE Common Shares, pursuant to customary provisions with respect to delivery of an “agent’s” message in accordance with the instructions set forth therein), and (ii) instructions to effect the surrender of PRE Certificates or Uncertificated PRE Common Shares in exchange for the PRE Consideration, and (2) each Axis Shareholder of record of Axis Common Shares converted pursuant to Section 2.1(c): (i) a letter of transmittal (which shall be in form and substance as the parties may reasonably specify at least three Business Days prior to the Effective Time, including that delivery shall be effective upon the proper delivery of the Axis Certificates or, in the case of Uncertificated Axis Common Shares, pursuant to customary provisions with respect to delivery of an “agent’s” message in accordance with the instructions set forth therein), and (ii) instructions to effect the surrender of Axis Certificates or Uncertificated Axis Common Shares in exchange for the Axis Consideration. Following the Effective Time, upon surrender of title to the PRE Common Shares previously held by a PRE Shareholder in accordance with this Section 2.2, together with a duly executed letter of transmittal and such other documents as the Exchange Agent may reasonably require, a PRE Shareholder shall be entitled to receive in exchange therefor: (A) a certificate or book-entry representing that number of whole Amalgamated Company Common Shares (rounded down) which such PRE Shareholder has the right to receive as PRE Consideration payable in respect thereof and (B) any cash in lieu of fractional shares that such shareholder has the right to receive pursuant to Section 2.2(g), and any PRE Certificate so surrendered shall be marked as cancelled immediately. In the event that the PRE Consideration is to be paid to a Person that is not registered in the transfer records of PRE, a certificate or book-entry representing the PRE Consideration may be issued to such Person if: (i) the PRE Certificate representing such PRE Common Shares (if any) is presented to the Exchange Agent, (ii) all documents so required to evidence and effect such transfer that are reasonably satisfactory to the Amalgamated Company are presented to the Exchange Agent and (iii) evidence reasonably satisfactory to the Amalgamated Company is presented confirming that any applicable stock transfer taxes have been paid. Following the Effective Time, upon surrender of title to the Axis Common Shares previously held by an Axis Shareholder in accordance with this Section 2.2, together with a duly executed letter of transmittal and such other documents as the Exchange Agent may reasonably require, an Axis Shareholder shall be entitled to receive in exchange therefor: (A) a certificate or book-entry representing that number of whole Amalgamated Company Common Shares (rounded down) which such Axis Shareholder has the right to receive as Axis Consideration payable in respect thereof and (B) any cash in lieu of fractional shares that such shareholder has the right to receive pursuant to Section 2.2(g), and any Axis Certificate so surrendered shall be marked as cancelled immediately. In the event that the Axis Consideration is to be paid to a Person that is not registered in the transfer records of Axis, a certificate or book-entry representing the Axis Consideration may be issued to such Person if: (1) the Axis Certificate as applicable, representing such Axis Common Shares (if any) is presented to the Exchange Agent, (2) all documents so required to evidence and effect such transfer that are reasonably satisfactory to the Amalgamated Company are presented to the Exchange Agent and (3) evidence reasonably satisfactory to the Amalgamated Company is presented confirming that any applicable share transfer taxes have been paid.
(e) Distributions with Respect to Unexchanged Shares. No dividends or other distributions declared or made with respect to Amalgamated Company Common Shares with a record date on or following the Effective Time shall be paid to any holder of any unexchanged PRE Certificate, Uncertificated PRE Common Shares, unexchanged Axis Certificate, or Uncertificated Axis Common Shares with respect to PRE Common Shares or Axis Common Shares (as the case may be) represented thereby, nor shall the cash payment in lieu of fractional shares be paid to any such holder pursuant to Section 2.2(g), until such holder has exchanged such PRE Certificate, Uncertificated PRE Common Shares, unexchanged Axis Certificate, or Uncertificated Axis Common Shares in accordance with the instructions and procedures set forth in this Article II. Following such exchange, such former PRE Shareholder or Axis Shareholder (as the case may be) shall be entitled to receive, in addition to their applicable Consideration, without interest: (i) at the time of such exchange, any dividends or other distributions with a record date on or following the Effective Time theretofore payable with respect to such whole Amalgamated Company Common Shares and not paid and (ii) at the appropriate payment date, the dividends or other distributions payable with respect to such whole Amalgamated Company Common Shares with a record date after the Effective Time but with a payment date subsequent to the date of the exchange.
(f) No Further Rights in Common Shares. All PRE Consideration or other cash amounts received or paid upon the surrender of title to PRE Common Shares in accordance with the terms of this Article II shall be deemed to have been issued (and paid) in full satisfaction of all rights pertaining to such PRE Common Shares. From and after the Effective Time, the PRE Share Register shall be closed and there shall be no further registration of transfers on the share transfer books of the Amalgamated Company of the PRE Common Shares that were outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time. If, after the Effective Time, any outstanding PRE Common Shares are presented to the Amalgamated Company or the Exchange Agent, such Common Shares shall be cancelled and exchanged for PRE Consideration provided for, and in accordance with the provisions set forth, in this Article II. All Axis Consideration or other cash amounts received or paid upon the surrender of title to the Axis Common Shares in accordance with the terms of this Article II shall be deemed to have been issued (and paid) in full satisfaction of all rights pertaining to such Axis Common Shares. From and after the Effective Time, the Axis Share Register shall be closed and there shall be no further registration of transfers on the share transfer books of the Amalgamated Company of the Axis Common Shares that were outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time. If, after the Effective Time, any outstanding Axis Common Shares are presented to the Amalgamated Company or the Exchange Agent, such Common Shares shall be cancelled and exchanged for Axis Consideration provided for, and in accordance with the provisions set forth, in this Article II.
(g) No Fractional Shares. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, no fraction of an Amalgamated Company Common Share shall be issued in connection with the Amalgamation. In lieu thereof, any PRE Shareholder or Axis Shareholder who would otherwise have been entitled to a fraction of an Amalgamated Company Common Share, shall be paid upon surrender of their respective PRE Common Shares or Axis Common Shares for exchange (after aggregating all PRE Common Shares or Axis Common Shares of such Person), cash in an amount (without interest) equal to the difference of (i) the aggregate number of shares of Amalgamated Company Common Stock to be delivered to the Exchange Agent by Amalgamated Company pursuant to Section 2.2(b) minus (ii) the aggregate number of whole
shares of Amalgamated Company Common Stock to be distributed, in aggregate, to the Axis Shareholders and the PRE Shareholders pursuant to Sections 2.1(b) and (c) (such excess being, the “Excess Shares”). The parties acknowledge that payment of the cash consideration in lieu of issuing fractional shares was not separately bargained-for consideration but merely represents a mechanical rounding off for purposes of avoiding the expense and inconvenience to Amalgamated Company that would otherwise be caused by the issuance of fractional shares. As soon as practicable after the Effective Time, the Exchange Agent, as agent for the holders of the certificates representing shares of Amalgamated Company Common Stock that would otherwise receive fractional shares, shall sell the Excess Shares at then prevailing prices on the NYSE. Such sale of the Excess Shares by the Exchange Agent, as agent for the holders that would otherwise receive fractional shares, shall be executed on the NYSE at then-prevailing market prices and shall be executed in round lots to the extent practicable. Until the proceeds of such sale or sales have been distributed to the respective PRE Shareholders and Axis Shareholders (as the case may be), the Exchange Agent shall hold such proceeds in trust for such shareholders (the “Common Share Trust”). The Exchange Agent shall reasonably determine the portion of the Common Share Trust to which the respective PRE Shareholders and Axis Shareholders (as the case may be) shall be entitled on a pro rata basis.
(h) Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Certificates. If any PRE Certificates or Axis Certificates (as the case may be) have been lost, stolen or destroyed, the Exchange Agent shall issue and pay in exchange for such lost, stolen or destroyed PRE Certificates or Axis Certificates (as the case may be), upon the making of an affidavit of that fact by the Person claiming to be the holder thereof, the respective Consideration and any dividends or other distributions payable pursuant to this Article II in respect thereof; provided that the Amalgamated Company may, in its reasonable discretion, require such Person to either deliver a bond in such sum as the Amalgamated Company may reasonably direct or otherwise indemnify the Amalgamated Company in a manner reasonably satisfactory to the Amalgamated Company against any claim that may be made against the Amalgamated Company or the Exchange Agent with respect to the PRE Certificates or Axis Certificates (as the case may be) alleged to have been lost, stolen or destroyed.
(i) Termination of Exchange Fund. Any portion of the Exchange Fund that remains undistributed to the respective PRE Shareholders or Axis Shareholders for 180 days following the Effective Time shall be delivered to the Amalgamated Company, upon demand. Any respective holder of PRE Common Shares or Axis Common Shares who has not theretofore complied with this Article II shall thereafter look only to the Amalgamated Company for payment of their respective Consideration and any cash dividends or distributions with respect to Axis Common Shares or PRE Common Shares payable pursuant to this Article II.
(j) No Liability. To the extent permitted under applicable Law, any Consideration and any dividends or other distributions payable to any PRE Shareholder or Axis Shareholder in accordance with this Article II that remains undistributed to the respective PRE Shareholder and Axis Shareholder shall be delivered to and become the property of the Amalgamated Company on the Business Day immediately prior to the day that such property is required to be delivered to any public official pursuant to any applicable abandoned property, escheat or similar Law. Neither the Amalgamated Company nor the Exchange Agent shall be liable to any respective PRE Shareholder or Axis Shareholder for any such property delivered to
the Amalgamated Company or to a public official pursuant to any applicable abandoned property, escheat or similar Law.
(k) Withholding Rights. The Exchange Agent, Axis, PRE and the Amalgamated Company shall be entitled to deduct and withhold from any Consideration or other amounts payable pursuant to this Agreement to any PRE Shareholder or Axis Shareholder such amounts as may be required under the Code or any other provision of applicable federal, state, local or foreign Tax Law. To the extent that such amounts are so deducted or withheld and are paid over to the applicable Governmental Entity, such deducted or withheld amounts shall be treated for all purposes of this Agreement as having been paid to the respective PRE Shareholder or Axis Shareholder in respect of whom such deduction or withholding was made.
2.3 Treatment of Equity Awards.
(a) Treatment of PRE Options. As of the Effective Time, each outstanding option to purchase PRE Common Shares under any PRE Share Plan (each, a “PRE Option”), whether vested or unvested, shall be treated in accordance with the terms of the applicable grant or award agreement and PRE Share Plan and, automatically and without any required action on the part of the holder thereof, be converted into an option to purchase, on the same terms and conditions as applied to each such PRE Option immediately prior to the Effective Time, the number of whole Amalgamated Company Common Shares (rounded down to the nearest whole share) that is equal to the number of PRE Common Shares subject to such PRE Option immediately prior to the Effective Time multiplied by the PRE Exchange Ratio, at an exercise price per Amalgamated Company Common Share (rounded up to the nearest whole penny) equal to the exercise price for each such PRE Common Share subject to such PRE Option immediately prior to the Effective Time divided by the PRE Exchange Ratio; provided, that in the case of any PRE Option to which Section 421 of the Code applies as of the Effective Time by reason of its qualification under Section 422 of the Code, the exercise price, the number of Amalgamated Company Common Shares subject to such option and the terms and conditions of exercise of such option shall be determined in a manner consistent with the requirements of Section 424(a) of the Code.
(b) Treatment of PRE Share Appreciation Rights. As of the Effective Time, each outstanding share appreciation right under any PRE Share Plan (each, a “PRE SAR”), whether vested or unvested, shall be treated in accordance with the terms of the applicable grant or award agreement and PRE Share Plan and, automatically and without any required action on the part of the holder thereof, be converted into a share appreciation right, on the same terms and conditions as applied to each such PRE SAR immediately prior to the Effective Time, to the number of whole Amalgamated Company Common Shares (rounded down to the nearest whole share) that is equal to the number of PRE Common Shares subject to such PRE SAR immediately prior to the Effective Time multiplied by the PRE Exchange Ratio, at an exercise price per Amalgamated Company Common Share (rounded up to the nearest whole penny) equal to the exercise price for each such PRE Common Share subject to such PRE SAR immediately prior to the Effective Time divided by the PRE Exchange Ratio.
(c) Treatment of PRE Other Company Share-Based Awards.
(i) Immediately prior to the Effective Time, each right of any kind, contingent or accrued, to receive PRE Common Shares (including restricted share units and performance share units), other than PRE Options and PRE SARS (each, a “PRE Other Share-Based Award”), which under the terms of the applicable grant or award agreement and PRE Share Plan becomes fully vested and settled effective as of the Effective Time shall vest and be settled in accordance with its terms (and for the avoidance of doubt, all such performance share units shall vest and settle as if the maximum performance were achieved) and each PRE Common Share delivered in settlement thereof (after giving effect to any required reduction in respect of withholding tax obligation due in respect of such vesting and settlement), shall be eligible to receive the PRE Consideration pursuant to Section 2.1(b) of this Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, any PRE Other Share-Based Awards held by members of the PRE Board who are not PRE Board Designees shall be treated as if such individuals experienced a termination due to mandatory retirement effective as of the Effective Time under the terms of the applicable grant or award agreement and PRE Share Plan.
(ii) Immediately prior to the Effective Time, each PRE Other Share-Based Award which is not vested as of the Effective Time shall, by virtue of the Amalgamation and without any action on the part of the holder thereof, be converted into a right to receive a number of Amalgamated Company Common Shares determined by multiplying the number of PRE Common Shares subject to such PRE Other Share-Based Award immediately prior to the Effective Time by the PRE Exchange Ratio and rounding up or down to the nearest whole share, and such Amalgamated Company Common Shares subject to a PRE Other Share-Based Award shall be subject to the same terms and conditions (including applicable vesting requirements) as applied to such PRE Other Share-Based Award immediately prior to the Effective Time.
(d) Treatment of Axis Options. As of the Effective Time, each outstanding option to purchase Axis Common Shares under any Axis Share Plan (each, an “Axis Option”), whether vested or unvested, shall, automatically and without any required action on the part of the holder thereof, be converted into an option to purchase, on the same terms and conditions (including applicable vesting requirements) as applied to each such Axis Option immediately prior to the Effective Time, the number of whole Amalgamated Company Common Shares (rounded down to the nearest whole share) that is equal to the number of Axis Common Shares subject to such Axis Option immediately prior to the Effective Time multiplied by the Axis Exchange Ratio, at an exercise price per Amalgamated Company Common Share (rounded up to the nearest whole penny) equal to the exercise price for each such Axis Common Share subject to such Axis Option immediately prior to the Effective Time divided by the Axis Exchange Ratio; provided, that in the case of any Axis Option to which Section 421 of the Code applies as of the Effective Time by reason of its qualification under Section 422 of the Code, the exercise price, the number of Amalgamated Company Common Shares subject to such option and the terms and conditions of exercise of such option shall be determined in a manner consistent with the requirements of Section 424(a) of the Code.
(e) Treatment of Axis Restricted Share Awards. Immediately prior to the Effective Time, each award of Axis Common Shares that is subject to restrictions pursuant to the terms of an Axis Share Plan, (each, an “Axis Restricted Share Award”), shall, by virtue of the
Amalgamation and without any action on the part of the holder thereof, be converted into an award covering a number of Amalgamated Company Common Shares determined by multiplying the number of Axis Common Shares subject to such Axis Restricted Share Award immediately prior to the Effective Time by the Axis Exchange Ratio and rounding down to the nearest whole share, and such Amalgamated Company Common Shares shall be subject to the same terms and conditions (including applicable vesting requirements) as applied to each such Axis Restricted Share Award immediately prior to the Effective Time. Notwithstanding the foregoing, each of the time-vesting Axis Restricted Share Awards specially granted in February 2014 to assistant vice presidents and above, as converted pursuant to this Section 2.3(e) shall, and any Axis Restricted Share Awards issued pursuant to Section 5.1(c)(C), as converted pursuant to this Section 2.3(e), may at Axis’s option, as of the Effective Time and without any required action on the part of the holder thereof, become fully vested and exercisable with respect to one hundred percent (100%) of the Amalgamated Company Common Shares subject to such Axis Restricted Share Awards.
(f) Treatment of Axis Other Share-Based Awards.
(i) Immediately prior to the Effective Time, each right of any kind, contingent or accrued, to receive Axis Common Shares (including restricted share units and performance share units), other than Axis Options (each, an “Axis Other Share-Based Award”), shall, by virtue of the Amalgamation and without any action on the part of the holder thereof, be converted into a right to receive a number of Amalgamated Company Common Shares determined by multiplying the number of Axis Common Shares subject to such Axis Other Share-Based Award immediately prior to the Effective Time by the Axis Exchange Ratio and rounding up or down to the nearest whole share, and such Amalgamated Company Common Shares subject to the Axis Other Share-Based Award shall be subject to the same terms and conditions (including applicable vesting requirements) as applied to such Axis Other Share-Based Award immediately prior to the Effective Time, after giving effect to any adjustment made pursuant to Section 2.3(f)(ii) of this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, each of the time-vesting Axis Other Share-Based Awards specially granted in February 2014 to assistant vice presidents and above, as converted pursuant to this Section 2.3(f)(i) shall, and any Axis Other Share-Based Awards issued pursuant to Section 5.1(c)(C), as converted pursuant to this Section 2.3(f)(i), may at Axis’s option, as of the Effective Time and without any required action on the part of the holder thereof, become fully vested and exercisable with respect to one hundred percent (100%) of the Amalgamated Company Common Shares subject to such Axis Other Share-Based Awards.
(ii) Prior to, and effective as of and contingent upon the occurrence of the Effective Time, the Axis Board shall equitably adjust the performance criteria applicable to any equity-based award outstanding under any Axis Share Plan, in accordance with the terms of the applicable Axis Share Plan and any applicable grant or award agreements, to reflect the consummation of the Amalgamation and to prevent any dilution or enlargement of achievement opportunity with respect to such equity-based awards.
(g) Prior to the Effective Time, the PRE Board, Axis Board and their respective compensation committees, shall take all actions necessary to effectuate the provisions of this Section 2.3.
2.4 Amendment of Structure. The parties shall amend this Agreement prior to the filing of the Joint Proxy Statement to provide for a structure other than an amalgamation (with Axis or PRE surviving or continuing or both surviving or continuing as subsidiaries of a new holding company, as the case may be) if the advantages (after taking into account any disadvantages) of such other structure would be more favorable after the Closing to the shareholders of PRE and Axis than in the Amalgamation.
ARTICLE III
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE PARTIES
Except as: (i) set forth in the disclosure letter delivered by PRE to Axis simultaneously with the execution of this Agreement by PRE (the “PRE Disclosure Letter”) or the disclosure letter delivered by Axis to PRE simultaneously with the execution of this Agreement by Axis (the “Axis Disclosure Letter” and each of the PRE Disclosure Letter and the Axis Disclosure Letter, a “Disclosure Letter”), as the case may be, (ii) in the case of Axis, disclosed in the Axis SEC Reports publicly filed with the SEC on or following January 1, 2014 and at least two Business Days prior to the execution of this Agreement (excluding any disclosures set forth in the “Risk Factors” or “Forward-Looking Statements” sections of such Axis SEC Report or that otherwise constitute risk factors or that are cautionary, predictive or forward-looking in nature), or (iii) in the case of PRE, disclosed in the PRE SEC Reports publicly filed with the SEC on or following January 1, 2014 and at least two Business Days prior to the execution of this Agreement (excluding any disclosures set forth in the “Risk Factors” or “Forward-Looking Statements” sections of such PRE SEC Report or that otherwise constitute risk factors or that are cautionary, predictive or forward-looking in nature), PRE hereby represents and warrants to Axis, and Axis hereby represents and warrants to PRE, to the extent applicable, in each case with respect to itself and its Subsidiaries (and not as to the other party or its Subsidiaries), as follows:
3.1 Organization, Standing and Power.
(a) Each of it and its Subsidiaries is a corporation, exempted company, limited liability company or other legal entity duly organized or incorporated, validly existing and in good standing (if and to the extent such term is so recognized in the relevant jurisdiction) under the Laws of its jurisdiction of organization or incorporation, except for those jurisdictions where failure to be in good standing would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. Each of it and its Subsidiaries has the requisite power and authority to own, lease and operate its assets and properties and to carry on its business as now conducted, except where failure to have such power or authority would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.
(b) Each of it and its Subsidiaries is duly qualified or licensed to do business as a foreign corporation, exempted company, limited liability company or other legal entity and
is in good standing (if and to the extent such term is so recognized in the relevant jurisdiction) in each jurisdiction where the character or location of the assets and properties owned, leased or operated by it or the nature of its business makes such qualification or license necessary, except where the failure to be so qualified or licensed or in good standing would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. Neither it nor any of its Subsidiaries is in violation of their respective Organizational Documents in any material respect.
(c) It has provided or made available to the other party true and complete copies of: (i) its memorandum of association (the “Memorandum of Association”) and bye-laws (the “Bye-Laws”) in effect as of the date hereof and (ii) the memorandum of association and bye-laws or other similar Organizational Documents in effect as of the date hereof of each of its material Insurance Subsidiaries.
3.2 Capitalization.
(a) Its authorized share capital and issued and outstanding share capital as of the date set forth in Section 3.2(a) of its Disclosure Letter, including any capital reserved for issuance upon the exercise or payments of outstanding warrants, share options, share appreciation rights or other equity-related securities or awards (such share option and other equity-related award plans, agreements and programs, each an “Equity Award”), are described in Section 3.2(a) of its Disclosure Letter. None of its share capital, equity-related securities or warrants are held by it or by its Subsidiaries. Section 3.2(a) of its Disclosure Letter also sets forth a true and complete list of all outstanding Equity Awards outstanding as of the date of this Agreement and the name of each holder thereof and the number of PRE Common Shares (in the case of PRE) or Axis Common Shares (in the case of Axis) for which any such warrant, option, share appreciation right, restricted share, restricted share unit or other equity-related security or award is exercisable for as of the date of this Agreement (without regard to any vesting or other limitations with respect thereof).
(b) Except as described in this Section 3.2, as of the date hereof, there are: (i) no shares or securities of, or other equity or voting interests in, it, (ii) no issued and outstanding shares or securities of it that are convertible into or exchangeable for share capital of, or other equity or voting interests in, it, (iii) no outstanding options, warrants, rights or other commitments or agreements to acquire from it, or that obligate it to issue, any shares or securities, or other equity or voting interests in, it, (iv) no obligations of it to grant, extend or enter into any subscription, warrant, right, convertible or exchange security or other similar agreement or commitment relating to any shares or securities of, or other equity or voting interests in it (the items in clauses (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) being referred to, collectively, as its “Securities”), and (v) no other obligations by it or any of its Subsidiaries to make any payments based on the price or value of any of its Securities, or dividends paid thereon.
(c) With respect to the Equity Awards: (i) each grant of an Equity Award was duly authorized no later than the date on which the grant of such Equity Award was by its terms to be effective (the “Grant Date”) by all necessary corporate action, including, as applicable, approval by the Axis Board or the PRE Board, or a committee thereof or such committee’s designee (as the case may be) and any required approval by its shareholders, (ii) each such grant
was made in accordance with all applicable Laws, including the rules of the NYSE, (iii) the per share exercise price of each PRE Option (in the case of PRE) or Axis Option (in the case of the Axis) was not less than the fair market value of a respective PRE Common Share or Axis Common Share on the applicable Grant Date, (iv) each such grant qualifies in all material respects for the Tax and accounting treatment afforded to such Equity Awards in its Tax Returns and its SEC Reports, respectively, and (v) no material modifications have been made to any such grants after the Grant Date and all such grants either comply in all material respects with or are exempt from Section 409A of the Code. The treatment of the Equity Awards provided in Section 2.3 will comply with all applicable Laws and the terms and conditions of the PRE Share Plans (in the case of PRE) or Axis Share Plans (in the case of Axis), respectively, and the applicable Equity Award agreements.
(d) All PRE Common Shares and PRE Preferred Shares (in the case of PRE) or Axis Common Shares and Axis Preferred Shares (in the case of Axis) that are issued and outstanding or that are subject to issuance prior to the Effective Time upon the terms and subject to the conditions specified in the instruments under which they are issuable: (i) are, or, in the case of shares issued after the date hereof, will be, duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable, and issued in compliance with applicable Law and the terms and provisions of its applicable Organizational Documents, and (ii) are not, or, in the case of shares issued after the date hereof, will not be, subject to any pre-emptive or similar rights, purchase option call or right of first refusal or similar rights.
(e) There are no outstanding contractual obligations of it or any of its Subsidiaries: (i) to repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any PRE Common Shares and PRE Preferred Shares (in the case of PRE) or Axis Common Shares and Axis Preferred Shares (in the case of Axis), as applicable, bonds, debentures, notes or other indebtedness of it or share capital, bonds, debentures, notes or other indebtedness of any Subsidiary of it or (ii) to provide any funds to or make any investment in (A) any Subsidiary of it that is not wholly owned by it or (B) any other Person. No holder of securities in it or any of its Subsidiaries has any right to have such securities registered by it or any of its Subsidiaries under the Exchange Act.
(f) The PRE Common Shares and PRE Preferred Shares (in the case of PRE) or the Axis Common Shares and Axis Preferred Shares (in the case of Axis), as applicable, constitute the only issued and outstanding classes of securities of it or its Subsidiaries registered under the Exchange Act.
(g) Section 3.2(g) of its Disclosure Letter contains a list of all insurance linked securities, sidecars, catastrophe bonds or weather related bonds or similar instruments issued, guaranteed or sponsored by it or any of its Subsidiaries.
(h) It has not guaranteed the obligations of any of its Subsidiaries.
3.3 Corporate Authorization. It has all necessary corporate power and authority to enter into this Agreement and the Amalgamation Agreement and, subject to approval and adoption of this Agreement and the Amalgamation Agreement by the Requisite PRE Vote (in the case of PRE) or the Requisite Axis Vote (in the case of the Axis), to consummate the Transactions. The execution, delivery and performance by it of this Agreement, the
Amalgamation Agreement and the consummation by it of the Transactions have been duly and validly authorized by all necessary corporate action on its part, subject only to the Requisite PRE Vote (in the case of PRE) or the Requisite Axis Vote (in the case of the Axis). The Requisite Axis Vote, in the case of Axis, and the Requisite PRE Vote, in the case of PRE, as applicable, is the only vote of the holders of any class or series of its share capital or other securities necessary to approve this Agreement, the Amalgamation Agreement or the Transactions to which it is a party.
3.4 Board Approval.
(a) In the case of PRE, the PRE Board, by resolutions duly passed at a meeting duly called and held, has: (i) determined that the PRE Consideration and the PRE Exchange Ratio constitute fair value for each PRE Common Share in accordance with the Companies Act and deemed it advisable and fair to, and in the best interests of, PRE to enter into this Agreement and to consummate the Transactions to which PRE is a party; (ii) approved and adopted this Agreement and authorized and approved the Transactions to which PRE is a party; and (iii) recommended that the shareholders of PRE vote affirmatively in connection with obtaining the Requisite PRE Vote (the “PRE Board Recommendation”), subject to Section 5.8, and directed that this Agreement, the Amalgamation Agreement and the Transactions to which PRE is a party be submitted for consideration by the shareholders of PRE at the PRE Shareholder Meeting.
(b) In the case of Axis, the Axis Board, by resolutions duly passed at a meeting duly called and held, has: (i) determined that the Axis Consideration and the Axis Exchange Ratio constitute fair value for each Axis Common Share in accordance with the Companies Act and deemed it advisable and fair to, and in the best interests of, Axis to enter into this Agreement and to consummate the Transactions to which Axis is a party; (ii) approved and adopted this Agreement and authorized and approved the Transactions; and (iii) recommended that the shareholders of Axis vote affirmatively in connection with obtaining the Required Axis Vote (the “Axis Board Recommendation”), subject to Section 5.8, and directed that this Agreement, the Amalgamation Agreement and the Transactions be submitted for consideration by the shareholders of Axis at the Axis Shareholder Meeting; and (iv) determined that the Axis Bye-Law Amendment is in the best interests of Axis, and authorized and approved the Axis Bye-Law Amendment.
3.5 Enforceability. This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by it and, assuming the due authorization, execution and delivery of this Agreement by the other parties hereto, constitutes a legal, valid and binding agreement of it, enforceable against it in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, subject to the effect of any applicable bankruptcy, insolvency (including all Laws related to fraudulent transfers), reorganization, moratorium or similar Laws affecting creditors’ rights generally and subject to the effect of general principles of equity (whether considered in a proceeding at equity or at law).
3.6 Non-Contravention. The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement and the Amalgamation Agreement by it and the consummation by it of the Transactions to which it is a party do not and will not (assuming the accuracy of the
representations and warranties of the other parties hereto made in this Section 3.6 and Section 3.8 below):
(a) contravene or conflict with, or result in any violation or breach of, any provision of its Organizational Documents (in the case of Axis, as they may be amended pursuant to the Axis Bye-Law Amendment);
(b) contravene or conflict with, or result in any violation or breach of, any Laws or Orders applicable to it or any of its Subsidiaries or by which any of its assets or those of any of its Subsidiaries (“Party Assets”) are bound, assuming that all consents, approvals, authorizations, filings and notifications described in Section 3.8 have been obtained or made or, if not obtained or made, would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect;
(c) result in any violation or breach of, or constitute a default (with or without notice or lapse of time or both) under, any Contracts, except for any Reinsurance Contracts, to which it or any of its Subsidiaries is a party or by which any of their assets are bound (collectively, “Party Contracts”), except as would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect;
(d) require any consent, approval or other authorization of, or filing with or notification to, any Person under any Party Contracts, except as would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect;
(e) give rise to any termination, cancellation, amendment, modification or acceleration of any rights or obligations under any Party Contracts, except as would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect; or
(f) cause the creation or imposition of any Liens on any Party Assets, except as would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.
3.7 Subsidiaries.
(a) Each of its Subsidiaries is wholly owned by it, directly or indirectly, free and clear of any Liens other than Permitted Encumbrances. Except for Investment Assets held in the ordinary course of business and the capital stock or other equity ownership interests of its Subsidiaries set forth in Section 3.7 of its Disclosure Letter, it does not own, directly or indirectly, any share capital or other equity interest of, or any other securities convertible or exchangeable into or exercisable for share capital or equity interest of, any Person.
(b) Each issued and outstanding share of the share capital or non-corporate equity interests (including partnership interests and limited liability company interests), as applicable, of each of its Subsidiaries that is held, directly or indirectly, by it: (i) is duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable, and was issued in compliance with the applicable Laws, terms and conditions of the applicable Subsidiary’s Organizational Documents and any preemptive or similar rights, subscription rights, anti-dilutive rights, purchase option,
call or right of first refusal or similar rights and (ii) is not or, in the case of any share or non-corporate equity interest issued after the date hereof, will not be, subject to any pre-emptive or similar rights, purchase option, call or right of first refusal or similar rights.
(c) All of the outstanding share capital of, or other equity or voting interests in, of each of its Subsidiaries are owned directly or indirectly, by it free and clear of all Liens other than Permitted Encumbrances. There are no subscriptions, options, warrants, rights, calls, contracts or other commitments, understandings, restrictions or arrangements relating to the issuance, acquisition, redemption, repurchase or sale of any share capital or other equity or voting interests of any of its Subsidiaries, including any right of conversion or exchange under any outstanding security, instrument or agreement, any agreements granting any preemptive rights, subscription rights, anti-dilutive rights, rights of first refusal or similar rights with respect to any securities of any of its Subsidiaries. None of its Subsidiaries has any outstanding equity compensation plans relating to the share capital of, or other equity or voting interests in, any of its Subsidiaries. Neither it nor any of its Subsidiaries has any obligation to make any payments based on the price or value of any securities of any of its Subsidiaries or dividends paid thereon.
3.8 Governmental Authorizations. The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement and the Amalgamation Agreement by it and its Subsidiaries and the consummation by it and its Subsidiaries of the Transactions do not and will not require any consent, approval or other authorization of, or filing, license, permit, declaration or registration with or notification to, or waiver from, any international, national, federal, state, provincial or local governmental, regulatory or administrative authority, agency, commission, court, tribunal, arbitral body or self-regulated entity, whether domestic or foreign (each, a “Governmental Entity”), other than:
(a) (i) the filing of the Amalgamation Application and related attachments with the Registrar and (ii) the written notification from the Bermuda Monetary Authority confirming that the Bermuda Monetary Authority has no objection to the Amalgamation;
(b) the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) of the Registration Statement, the Prospectus, the Joint Proxy Statement and any other materials as may be required in connection with this Agreement and the Transactions and (ii) any other filings and reports that may be required in connection with this Agreement and the Transactions under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder (the ”Securities Act”), or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder (the “Exchange Act”);
(c) compliance with the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) rules and regulations;
(d) such filings and approvals as are required to be made or obtained under the securities or “Blue-Sky” laws of various jurisdictions in connection with the Transactions;
(e) compliance with the pre-merger notification requirements of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (the “HSR Act”) and, as set forth in
Section 3.8(e) of its Disclosure Letter, with respect to any Governmental Entity with jurisdiction over enforcement of any applicable antitrust or competition Laws;
(f) notices, applications, filings, authorizations, orders, approvals and waivers that are set forth in Section 3.8(f) of its Disclosure Letter (such notices, filings, authorizations, orders, approvals and waivers described in clauses (e) and (f), the “Transaction Approvals”); and
(g) where the failure to obtain such consents, approvals, authorizations or permits, or to make such filings or notifications, would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.
3.9 Vote Required.
(a) The Requisite PRE Vote (in the case of PRE) or the Requisite Axis Vote (in the case of Axis) is the only vote of the holders of any class or series of the share capital of it or any of its Subsidiaries necessary (under its Organizational Documents, the Companies Act, other applicable Laws or otherwise) to approve and adopt this Agreement, the Amalgamation Agreement and the Amalgamation.
(b) There are no shareholder agreements, voting trusts, proxies or similar agreements, arrangements or commitments to which it or any of its Subsidiaries is a party or of which it has Knowledge with respect to the voting of any of its shares or those of any of its Subsidiaries. There are no bonds, debentures, notes or other instruments of indebtedness of it or any of its Subsidiaries that have the right to vote, or that are convertible or exchangeable into or exercisable for securities having the right to vote, on any matters on which its shareholders may vote.
3.10 SEC Reports.
(a) It has timely filed with the SEC (including following any extensions of time for filing provided by Rule 12b-25 promulgated under the Exchange Act) all forms, reports, schedules, statements and other documents required to be filed by it with the SEC, and any documents or information furnished to the SEC on a voluntary basis on Current Reports on Form 8-K, in each case since January 1, 2012 (collectively, the “SEC Reports”). Its SEC Reports, as filed with or furnished to the SEC: (i) complied as to form in all material respects with the applicable requirements of the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, (ii) were prepared in all material respects in accordance with the respective requirements of the Securities Act, the Exchange Act and other applicable Laws and (iii) did not, at the time they were filed, or if amended or restated, at the time of such later amendment or restatement, and at their respective effective dates, contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading. None of its Subsidiaries is subject to the periodic reporting requirements of the Exchange Act or is otherwise required to file any forms, reports, schedules, statements or other documents with the SEC, any foreign Governmental Entity that performs a similar function to that of the SEC or any securities exchange or quotation service.
(b) As of their respective dates, or, if amended, as of the date of the last such amendment, its SEC Reports, as filed with or furnished to the SEC, complied in all material respects with the requirements of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act, as the case may be, and the applicable rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. As of the date hereof, there are no outstanding or unresolved written comments from the SEC with respect to its SEC Reports. As of the date hereof, to its Knowledge, none of its SEC Reports filed on or prior to the date hereof is the subject of ongoing SEC review.
3.11 Financial Statements; Internal Controls.
(a) The audited consolidated financial statements and unaudited consolidated interim financial statements (including all related notes and schedules) of it and its consolidated Subsidiaries included or incorporated by reference in its SEC Reports:
(i) complied in all material respects with applicable accounting requirements and the rules and regulations of the SEC;
(ii) were prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) applied on a consistent basis during the periods involved (except as may be indicated in the notes to those financial statements); and
(iii) fairly present in all material respects the consolidated financial position of it and its consolidated Subsidiaries as of the dates thereof and their consolidated results of operations and cash flows for the periods then ended (subject, in the case of any unaudited interim financial statements, to normal year-end adjustments, none of which are, individually or in the aggregate, material).
(b) No material weaknesses exist with respect to its internal control over financial reporting that would be required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 308(a)(3) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC that have not been disclosed in its SEC Reports as filed with or furnished to the SEC prior to the date hereof. It has established and maintains disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting (as such terms are defined in paragraphs (e) and (f), respectively, of Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act) as required by Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by it in the reports that it files and submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, including that information required to be disclosed by it in the reports that it files and submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to its management, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. It has disclosed, based on its most recent evaluation, to its outside auditors and the audit committee of its board of directors: (i) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect in any material respect its ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and (ii) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in its internal control over financial reporting. It has provided or made available to the other party true and complete copies of any such disclosure contemplated by clauses (i) and (ii) of the immediately
preceding sentence made by management to its independent auditors and the audit committee of its Board since January 1, 2012.
3.12 Liabilities.
(a) There are no liabilities or obligations of any kind, whether accrued, contingent, absolute, inchoate or otherwise (collectively, “Liabilities”) of it or any of its Subsidiaries that are required to be recorded or reflected on a balance sheet, including the footnotes thereto, prepared in accordance with GAAP, other than:
(i) Liabilities reflected or reserved for in the consolidated balance sheet of it and its consolidated Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013 or disclosed in the footnotes thereto, set forth in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the SEC prior to the date hereof; and
(ii) Liabilities incurred since December 31, 2013 in the ordinary course of business.
(b) Neither it nor any of its Subsidiaries is a party to, or has any commitment to become a party to, any joint venture, off-balance sheet partnership or any similar Contract (including any Contract relating to any transaction or relationship between or among it and any of its Subsidiaries, on the one hand, and any unconsolidated Affiliate, including any structured finance, special purpose or limited purpose entity, on the other hand, or any “off-balance sheet arrangement” (as defined in Item 303(a) of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Securities Act)), where the result, purpose or intended effect of such Contract is to avoid disclosure of any material transaction involving, or material liabilities of, it or any of its Subsidiaries in its SEC Reports.
(c) It is in compliance in all material respects with: (i) the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended and the rules and regulations of the SEC promulgated thereunder that are applicable to it and (ii) the rules and regulations of the NYSE that are applicable to it. With respect to each of its SEC Reports on Form 10-K or Form 10-Q, each of its principal executive officer and principal financial officer has made all certifications required by Rule 13a-14 or 15(d) under the Exchange Act and Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules and regulations of the SEC promulgated thereunder with respect to such SEC Reports. None of the “back-up” or “sub-certifications” made by any of its officers or employees or any of its Subsidiaries since January 1, 2012 to support any such certifications made by its principal executive officer or principal financial officer has identified or raised any significant exceptions.
3.13 Absence of Certain Changes. Since September 30, 2014 to the date of this Agreement: (1) except for the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement and the discussions, negotiations and Transactions related thereto, its business and that of its Subsidiaries has been carried on and conducted in all material respects in the ordinary course, (2) there has not been any declaration, setting aside for payment or payment of any dividend or other distribution in respect of any of the PRE Common Shares (in the case of PRE) or the Axis Common Shares (in the case of Axis), as applicable, or other of its equity or voting interests,
except for ordinary course quarterly dividends with payment dates and amounts consistent with past practice, (3) there has not been any change in any material respect in its or any of its Subsidiaries’ financial accounting or actuarial methods, principles or practices, except insofar as may have been required by GAAP, by Applicable SAP or applicable Law, and (4) there has not been any effect, change, event or occurrence that, individually or in the aggregate, has had or would reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.
3.14 Litigation. Other than ordinary course claims under Reinsurance Contracts within applicable policy or contractual limits that do not involve allegations of bad faith or seek extra-contractual obligations, are not the subject of any proceeding by or before any Governmental Entity and have not proceeded to formal litigation, arbitration or mediation, there are no legal actions, claims, demands, arbitrations, hearings, charges, complaints, investigations, examinations, indictments, litigations, suits or other civil, criminal, administrative or investigative proceedings (collectively, “Legal Actions”) pending or, to its Knowledge, threatened against: (5) it or any of its Subsidiaries or (6) any of its or its Subsidiaries’ directors, officers or employees or other Person for whom it or any of its Subsidiaries may be liable, except as would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. There are no Orders outstanding against it, any of its Subsidiaries or their respective properties and assets, except as would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.
3.15 Investments; Derivatives.
(a) Except for bonds, stocks, mortgage loans, derivatives (including swaps, swaptions, caps, floors, foreign exchange and options or forward agreements) and all other instruments of indebtedness, stocks, partnership or joint venture interests and all other equity interests, certificates issued by or interests in trusts, alternatives investments and direct and indirect investments in hedge funds and other investments (the “Investment Assets”) sold in the ordinary course of business after September 30, 2014 or in compliance with the Investment Guidelines, each of it and its Subsidiaries, as applicable, has good and marketable title to all of the Investment Assets it purports to own, free and clear of all Liens except Permitted Encumbrances. A copy of its policies with respect to the investment of the Investment Assets has been made available no later than one day prior to the date hereof (the “Investment Guidelines”), and the composition of the Investment Assets complies in all material respects with, and it and its Subsidiaries have complied in all material respects with, the Investment Guidelines.
(b) The Investment Assets in all material respects comply with, and the acquisition thereof complied with, any and all investment restrictions under applicable Law.
3.16 Insurance Matters.
(a) Section 3.16(a) of its Disclosure Letter contains a true and correct list of each of its Subsidiaries which, by virtue of its operations and activities, is required to be licensed as an insurance company, reinsurance company or insurance or reinsurance intermediary (collectively, its “Insurance Subsidiaries”), together with the jurisdiction of domicile thereof and each jurisdiction in which each such Insurance Subsidiary is licensed to conduct the business of
insurance or reinsurance or as an intermediary. None of its Insurance Subsidiaries is commercially domiciled in any other jurisdiction or is otherwise treated as domiciled in a jurisdiction other than that of its formation. Each of its Insurance Subsidiaries and each of its other Subsidiaries that provide services to its Insurance Subsidiaries is licensed, authorized or otherwise eligible to conduct its business as currently conducted, to the extent required by Law, in each jurisdiction where it engages in business and for each line of business written therein, except where the failure to be so licensed, authorized or otherwise eligible to conduct its business as currently conducted would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.
(b) Except as required by Insurance Laws of general applicability and the insurance Permits maintained by its Insurance Subsidiaries, there are no material written agreements, memoranda of understanding, commitment letters or similar undertakings binding on it or on any of its Insurance Subsidiaries or to which it or any of its Insurance Subsidiaries is a party, on the one hand, and any Governmental Entity is a party or addressee, on the other hand, or any Orders by, or supervisory letters or cease-and-desist orders from, any Governmental Entity, nor have it or any of its Insurance Subsidiaries adopted any board or committee resolutions at the request of any Governmental Entity, in each case with respect to such Insurance Subsidiaries, including any that would (i) limit the ability of any of its Insurance Subsidiaries to enter into Reinsurance Contracts, (ii) require any divestiture of any investment of any of its Insurance Subsidiaries, (iii) in any manner relate to the ability of any of its Insurance Subsidiaries to pay dividends, (iv) require any investment of any of its Insurance Subsidiaries to be treated as non-admitted assets (or the local equivalent), (v) require or impose any capital commitment, “keep well��� or similar capital maintenance arrangement with respect to any of its Insurance Subsidiaries, or (vi) otherwise restrict the conduct of business of any of its Insurance Subsidiaries, nor have any of its Insurance Subsidiaries been advised by any Governmental Entity that it is contemplating any such undertakings.
(c) The financial statements included in all annual, quarterly and other periodic statements submitted to the appropriate Insurance Regulator of each jurisdiction in which any of its Insurance Subsidiaries is licensed or authorized or otherwise eligible or accredited with respect to the conduct of the business of reinsurance since January 1, 2012 (collectively, its “Statutory Statements”) were prepared in accordance with Applicable SAP, applied on a consistent basis during the periods involved, and fairly present in all material respects the statutory financial position of the relevant Insurance Subsidiary as of the respective dates thereof and the results of operations and changes in capital and surplus (and shareholders’ equity, as applicable) of such Insurance Subsidiary for the respective periods then ended. Such Statutory Statements complied in all material respects with all applicable Insurance Laws when filed or submitted and no material violation or deficiency has been asserted in writing (or, to the Knowledge of it, orally) by any Insurance Regulator with respect to any of such Statutory Statements that has not been cured or otherwise resolved to the satisfaction of such Insurance Regulator.
(d) It has provided or made available to the other party to the extent permitted by applicable Law, true and complete copies of all material examination reports (and has notified the other party of any pending material examinations) of any Insurance Regulators received by it on or after January 1, 2012 through the date of this Agreement relating to its Insurance
Subsidiaries. All material deficiencies or violations noted in such examination reports have been cured or resolved to the satisfaction of the applicable Insurance Regulator prior to the date of this Agreement. It has also provided the other party with true and complete copies of its written guidelines and policies with regard to underwriting, claims handling and actuarial reserves practices.
(e) Each Ceded Reinsurance Contract is valid and binding on its applicable Insurance Subsidiary, and to its Knowledge, each other party thereto, and is in full force and effect, except where the failure to be valid, binding or in full force and effect would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect, (ii) its applicable Insurance Subsidiary and, to its Knowledge, any other party thereto, has performed all obligations required to be performed by it under each Ceded Reinsurance Contract, except where such nonperformance would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect, (iii) none of its Insurance Subsidiaries has received written or, to its Knowledge, oral, notice of the existence of any event or condition which constitutes, or, after notice or lapse of time or both, will constitute, a default on the part of such Insurance Subsidiary under any Ceded Reinsurance Contract, except where such default would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect, (iv) to its Knowledge, with respect to each Ceded Reinsurance Contract, (A) there are no events or conditions which constitute, or, after notice or lapse of time or both, will constitute, a default on the part of any counterparty under such Ceded Reinsurance Contract, (B) to its Knowledge as of the date hereof, no such counterparty is insolvent or the subject of a rehabilitation, liquidation, conservatorship, receivership, bankruptcy or similar proceeding, (C) the financial condition of any reinsurer or retrocessionaire under such Ceded Reinsurance Contract is not impaired to the extent that a default thereunder is reasonably anticipated, except as would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect, (D) no notice of intended cancellation has been received by its Insurance Subsidiary from any such reinsurer or retrocessionaire and (E) its Insurance Subsidiary is entitled under the law of its domiciliary jurisdiction to take full credit in its Statutory Statements for all amounts recoverable by it pursuant to such Ceded Reinsurance Contract and all such amounts recoverable have been properly recorded in its books and records of account and are properly reflected in its Statutory Statements. As of the date hereof, there are no pending, and since January 1, 2012 to the date hereof, there have not been any, material disputes under any of the Ceded Reinsurance Contracts.
(f) Section 3.16(f) of its Disclosure Letter contains a true and correct list, as of the date of this Agreement, of each intercompany Reinsurance Contract between it and any of its Subsidiaries or among its Subsidiaries.
3.17 Material Contracts.
(a) As of the date hereof, there are no Contracts to which it or any of its Subsidiaries is a party (other than Reinsurance Contracts, Real Property Leases and Benefit Plans): (i) that are required to be described in, or filed as an exhibit to, any of its SEC Reports that are not so described or filed as required by the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, (ii) that contain any provisions restricting the ability of it or any of its Subsidiaries, or which, following the consummation of the Amalgamation, would restrict the ability of Axis or any of its Subsidiaries or PRE or any of its Subsidiaries or any of their successors, including the
Amalgamated Company and its Subsidiaries, to compete or transact in any business or with any Person or in any geographic area or grants a right of exclusivity to any Person, (iii) pursuant to which any indebtedness of it or any of its Subsidiaries is outstanding or may be incurred in excess of $50 million or pursuant to which it or any of its Subsidiaries guarantees any indebtedness of any other Person (other than it or any of its Subsidiaries) (except for trade payables arising in the ordinary course of business), (iv) involving any material partnership, joint venture or other similar arrangement with any other Person (other than it or any of its Subsidiaries), relating to the formation, creation, operation, management or control of any such partnership or joint venture, (v) that involves or could reasonably be expected to involve aggregate payments or receipts by or to it and/or its Subsidiaries in excess of $5 million in any twelve-month period, other than: (A) Contracts that can be terminated by it or any of its Subsidiaries on less than 90 days’ notice without payment by it or any of its Subsidiaries of any penalty, or (B) Assumed Reinsurance Contracts, (vi) that have been entered into since January 1, 2012 or otherwise provide for material ongoing obligations of it or any of its Subsidiaries and involve the acquisition from another Person or disposition to another Person of capital stock or other equity interests of another Person or of a business (excluding, for the avoidance of doubt, acquisitions or dispositions of Investment Assets, and immaterial tangible assets in the ordinary course of business), (vii) that outsources any material function or part of its business or that of any Subsidiary or Subsidiaries (viii) that prohibits or restricts the payment of dividends or distributions in respect of its shares or capital stock or those of any of its Subsidiaries, prohibits the pledging of the shares or capital stock of it or any of its Subsidiaries or prohibits or restricts the issuance of any guarantee by it or any of its Subsidiaries, (ix) that restricts its ability to incur indebtedness or guarantee the indebtedness of others, or (x) in its case (and not in the case of any of its Subsidiaries) that are guarantees, including of obligations, suretyship contracts, performance bonds or other form of guaranty agreement or capital maintenance agreements or any keep wells, or (xi) Contracts or agreements that contain a put, call or similar right pursuant to which it or any of its Subsidiaries could be required to purchase or sell, as applicable, any equity interests of any Person or assets that have a fair market value or purchase price of more than $50 million (each such Contract described in clauses (i)-(xi), other than any Reinsurance Contract, Real Property Lease or Benefit Plan, a “Material Contract”).
(b) (i) Each Material Contract is a legal, valid and binding agreement of it and its Subsidiaries to the extent such Person is a party thereto and, to its Knowledge, each other party thereto is in compliance in all material respects with its terms and is in full force and effect, except where the failure to be valid, binding or in full force and effect would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect, (ii) it and each of its Subsidiaries and, to its Knowledge, each other party thereto, has performed all obligations required to be performed by such Person under such Material Contract, except where such noncompliance would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect, (iii) neither it nor any of its Subsidiaries has received notice of the existence of any event or condition which constitutes, or, after notice or lapse of time or both, will constitute, a default on the part of it or any of its Subsidiaries under any Material Contract, except where such default would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect and (iv) there are no events or conditions which constitute, or, after notice or lapse of time or both, will constitute a default on the part of any counterparty under such Material Contract, except as would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.
(c) Section 3.17(c) of its Disclosure Letter contains a true and correct list, as of the date of this Agreement, of each Material Contract entered into by it or any of its Subsidiaries.
3.18 Benefit Plans.
(a) It has disclosed in Section 3.18 of its Disclosure Letter a true and complete list of all material Benefit Plans other than Benefit Plans maintained by it outside of the United States primarily for the benefit of Associates working outside of the United States (collectively, the “Non-U.S. Benefit Plans”), which are contributed to, sponsored by or maintained by it or its Subsidiaries, or under which any current or former Associate of it has any present or future rights to benefits. For the purposes of this Agreement, “Benefit Plans” include all benefit and compensation plans, programs, contracts, policies, agreements or arrangements covering its current or former Associates, or under which it has any liability (including any contingent liability), including but not limited to, “employee benefit plans” within the meaning of Section 3(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), whether or not such plans are subject to ERISA, and deferred compensation, pension, retirement, health, welfare, severance, employment, perquisite, change in control, stock option, stock purchase, stock appreciation rights, stock based, incentive, collective bargaining, fringe benefit, employee loan and bonus plans, programs, contracts, policies, agreements or arrangements. True and complete copies of all material Benefit Plans (or a written summary of any unwritten material Benefit Plan), including, to the extent applicable, (i) any trust agreement or insurance contract forming a part of such Benefit Plans, (ii) the most recent determination letter, (ii) the most recent Form 5500 and attached schedules, (iii) actuarial valuation reports, and (iv) any amendments and a summary of any proposed amendments or changes anticipated to be made to such Benefit Plans, have been provided or made available to the other party prior to the date of this Agreement.
(b) Except as would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect, (i) each Benefit Plan other than the Non-U.S. Benefit Plans, (collectively, the “U.S. Benefit Plans”) has been funded, established, maintained and administered in compliance with their respective terms, ERISA, the Code and other applicable Laws, (ii) each U.S. Benefit Plan intended to be qualified within the meaning of Section 401(a) of the Code is so qualified and has received a favorable determination or opinion letter from the Internal Revenue Service as to its qualification and there are no existing circumstances or any events that have occurred that could reasonably be expected to adversely affect the qualified status of any such plan, (iii) there are no pending or, to its Knowledge, threatened actions, claims or lawsuits against or relating to the Benefit Plans, the assets of any of the trusts under such plans or the sponsor or the administrator, or against any fiduciary of the Benefit Plan with respect to the operation of such arrangements (other than routine benefits claims), (iv) no Benefit Plan is under audit or investigation by any Governmental Entity which is reasonably expected to result in a material liability to it, (v) no “reportable event” (as such term is defined by Section 4043 of ERISA) or failure to satisfy the “minimum funding standard” within the meaning of Sections 412 and 430 of the Code or Section 302 of ERISA has occurred with respect to any Benefit Plan.
(c) It has not engaged in a transaction with respect to any Benefit Plan which is subject to ERISA that, assuming the taxable period of such transaction expired as of the date of this Agreement, would reasonably be expected to subject it to a material tax or penalty imposed by either Section 4975 of the Code or Section 502(i) of ERISA. It has not incurred, and it does not reasonably expect to incur, a material tax or penalty imposed by Section 4980F of the Code or Section 502 of ERISA or any material liability under Section 4071 of ERISA.
(d) Except as disclosed in Section 3.18(d) of its Disclosure Letter, neither it, its Subsidiaries, nor any of their respective predecessors, has contributed to, contributes to, has been required to contribute to, or otherwise participated in or participates in or in any way has any Liability, directly or indirectly, within the last six (6) years prior to the date hereof with respect to (i) an employee benefit plan that is or was subject to Title IV of ERISA, including, without limitation, any “multiemployer plan” (within the meaning of Sections 3(37) or 4001(a)(3) of ERISA or Section 414(f) of the Code), (ii) a “multiple employer plan” (as defined in Section 413 of the Code), (iii) a “multiple employer welfare arrangement (as defined in Section 3(40) of ERISA), or (iv) a plan maintained in connection with any trust described in Section 501(c)(9) of the Code. None of the Benefit Plans provide retiree health, life insurance or other welfare benefits except as may be required by Section 4980B of the Code and Section 601 of ERISA or any other applicable Law.
(e) There has been no amendment to, or announcement by it relating to, any of the U.S. Benefit Plans that would result in a material increase in liabilities to it above the level of the expense incurred in respect thereof for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014. Except as disclosed in Section 3.18(e) of its Disclosure Letter, neither the execution of this Agreement, shareholder approval and adoption of this Agreement and the Amalgamation Agreement, receipt of approval or clearance from any one or more Governmental Entities in connection with the Amalgamation or the other Transactions, nor the consummation of the Transactions, alone or in combination with any other event, will (i) entitle any Associates of it to severance or other payment, or increase any compensation or benefits due (other than severance pay required by applicable Law), (ii) accelerate the time of payment or vesting or result in any payment or funding (through a grantor trust or otherwise) of any compensation or benefits under, or increase the amount of compensation or benefits payable, under any Benefit Plan, (iii) result in payments that would individually or in combination with any other such payment, constitute an “excess parachute payment,” as defined in Section 280G(b)(l) of the Code, or (iv) limit or restrict its right to merge, amend or terminate any Benefit Plan. Except as disclosed in Section 3.18(e) of its Disclosure Letter, it is not a party to, and is not otherwise obligated under, any contract, agreement, plan or arrangement that provides for the gross-up of a Tax, interest or penalties imposed by Section 409A or 4999 of the Code (or any corresponding provision of state or local Law).
(f) All of the material Non-U.S. Benefit Plans are listed in Section 3.18(f) of the its Disclosure Letter. Except as would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect, (i) each of its Non-U.S. Benefit Plan been funded, established, maintained and administered in compliance in all material respects with their respective terms and all applicable Law (including compliance with any applicable requirements with respect to registration and good standing with regulatory authorities) and have been approved by any applicable taxation authorities for favorable taxation status to the extent such
approval is available (and circumstances do not exist that are reasonably likely to cause such approval to cease to apply), (ii) it has no material unfunded liabilities with respect to any such Non-U.S. Benefit Plans that are not set forth in the consolidated balance sheets included in or incorporated by reference into its SEC Reports filed prior to the date of this Agreement and (iii) there is no pending or, to the Knowledge of its executive officers, threatened material litigation relating to the Non-U.S. Benefit Plans.
3.19 Labor Relations.
(a) Except as would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect, each individual who renders (or, since January 1, 2012, any other individual who previously rendered) services to it or any of its Subsidiaries who is or was classified by it or any of its Subsidiaries as having the status of an independent contractor or other non-employee status for any purpose (including for purposes of taxation and tax reporting and under Benefit Plans) is currently or was previously properly so characterized.
(b) It is not party to any collective bargaining or similar agreement covering its employees, and its employees are not represented by any union, works council or labor organization. Except as would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect or as set forth in Section 3.19(b) of its Disclosure Letter: (i) neither it nor any of its Subsidiaries is the subject of any proceeding that asserts that it or any of its Subsidiaries has committed an unfair labor practice or that seeks to compel it to bargain with any labor union or labor organization and (ii) there is no pending or, to its Knowledge, threatened, labor strike, dispute, walk-out, work stoppage, slow down or lockout involving it or any of its Subsidiaries.
(c) Except as would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect, each of it and its Subsidiaries are, and since January 1, 2012, have been, in compliance in all material respects with all applicable Laws relating to employment and employment practices, the classification of employees, wages, overtime, hours, collective bargaining, unlawful discrimination, civil rights, safety and health, workers’ compensation, plant closing and mass layoff Laws (including the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, as amended, and each similar state, local or foreign Law) and terms and conditions of employment. Except as would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect, there are no charges with respect to or relating to either it or its Subsidiaries pending or, to its Knowledge, threatened before the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission or any national, federal, state or local agency, domestic or foreign, responsible for the prevention of unlawful employment practices.
3.20 Taxes. Except for such matters that would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect:
(a) All Tax Returns required to be filed by or with respect to it or any of its Subsidiaries have been timely (taking into account any applicable extensions) filed and all such Tax Returns are true, complete and correct.
(b) It and each of its Subsidiaries have fully paid all Taxes required to be paid and have made adequate provision (in accordance with GAAP or Applicable SAP, as applicable) for any Taxes that are not yet due and payable or that are being contested in good faith for all taxable periods, or portions thereof, ending on or before the date of this Agreement.
(c) It and each of its Subsidiaries have withheld all Taxes required to have been withheld from payments made to its employees, independent contractors, creditors, shareholders and other third parties and, to the extent required, such Taxes have been paid to the relevant Governmental Entity.
(d) There are no outstanding agreements extending or waiving the statutory period of limitations applicable to any claim for, or the period for the collection, assessment or reassessment of, Taxes due from it or any of its Subsidiaries for any taxable period and no request for any such waiver or extension is currently pending.
(e) No audit or other proceeding by any Governmental Entity is pending or to its Knowledge, threatened in writing with respect to any Taxes due from or with respect to it or any of its Subsidiaries. No claim for unpaid Taxes has been asserted against it or any of its Subsidiaries by a Governmental Entity, other than any claim that has been resolved and paid in full.
(f) Neither it nor any of its Subsidiaries has entered into any “closing agreement” as described in Section 7121 of the Code (or any similar provision of state, local or non-U.S. Tax Law) or been issued any private letter rulings, technical advice memoranda or similar agreement or rulings by any taxing authority.
(g) Neither it nor any of its Subsidiaries has been a “controlled corporation” or a “distributing corporation” in any distribution occurring during the two-year period ending on the date of this Agreement that was purported or intended to be governed by Section 355 of the Code (or any similar provision of state, local or non-U.S. Law).
(h) There are no Liens for Taxes on its assets or the assets any of its Subsidiaries other than Permitted Encumbrances.
(i) Neither it nor any of its Subsidiaries has participated in any “reportable transaction” within the meaning of Treasury Regulation Section 1.6011-4(b) (other than loss transactions) or comparable provision of any other applicable Tax Law, and neither it nor any of its Subsidiaries has been a “material advisor” to any such transaction within the meaning of Section 6111 of the Code.
(j) Neither it nor any of its Subsidiaries (A) has ever been a member of an affiliated, combined, consolidated or unitary Tax group for purposes of filing any Tax Return (other than a group of which it or one of its Subsidiaries is the common parent) or (B) has any liability for any Taxes of any Person (other than it or its Subsidiaries) under Treasury Regulation Section 1.1502-6 or any similar provision of state, local, or non-U.S. law, or as a transferee or successor, by contract or by operation of Law.
(k) Neither it nor any of the its Subsidiaries is a party to or bound by or has any obligation under any Tax sharing or similar agreement or arrangement (other than commercial agreements the primary subject matter of which is not Tax matters).
(l) It and each of its Subsidiaries currently satisfies (assuming the relevant taxable year ended on the date this representation is being given), and expects to satisfy with respect to the taxable year which includes the Closing Date falls, either or both of the exceptions described in Sections 953(c)(3)(A) and (B) of the Code so that none of its “United States shareholders” (within the meaning of Section 953(c) of the Code) will be required to include in income any of its or its Subsidiaries’ “related person insurance income” (within the meaning of Section 953(c)(2) of the Code) by operation of Sections 951(a) and 953(c)(5) of the Code.
(m) Neither it nor any of its Subsidiaries reasonably expects that it will be a passive foreign investment company (as defined in Section 1297 of the Code and the Treasury Regulations thereunder) for the taxable year which includes the Closing Date.
(n) Neither it nor any of its non-U.S. Subsidiaries are engaged in a trade or business within the United States within the meaning of Section 864(b) of the Code or have a permanent establishment in the United States.
(o) It has not elected under Section 897(i) of the Code to be treated as a “domestic corporation.”
3.21 Intellectual Property.
(a) Except as would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect:
(i) it and its Subsidiaries own or have enforceable rights or licenses to use the Intellectual Property used in, and necessary for, their business as currently conducted. Its and its Subsidiaries’ conduct of their business as currently conducted does not infringe upon, misappropriate or otherwise violate the Intellectual Property rights of any third party, and no claim has been asserted or, to its Knowledge, threatened against it or any of its Subsidiaries that the conduct of its and its Subsidiaries’ business as currently conducted infringes upon, misappropriates or otherwise violates the Intellectual Property rights of any third party;
(ii) none of its present or former employees, officers, or directors, or agents, outside contractors or any other third party holds any right, title or interest, directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, in or to any Owned Intellectual Property;
(iii) none of the Intellectual Property owned or purported to be owned by it or any of its Subsidiaries (the “Owned Intellectual Property”) has been adjudged invalid or unenforceable in whole or in part and, to its Knowledge, the Owned Intellectual Property is valid and enforceable. To its Knowledge, no Person is engaging in any activity that infringes upon the Owned Intellectual Property;
(iv) to its Knowledge, each agreement under which Intellectual Property is licensed to it or any of its Subsidiaries is valid and enforceable, is binding on all parties to such license, and is in full force and effect, and no party thereto is in breach thereof or default thereunder;
(v) it and its Subsidiaries have taken commercially reasonable measures to protect the confidential nature of the trade secrets and confidential information that they own or use;
(vi) to its Knowledge, the software it or any of its Subsidiaries owns or licenses for use does not contain any disabling mechanism or protection feature designed to prevent its use, including any computer virus, worm, software lock, drop-dead device, Trojan-horse routine, trap door, back door (including capabilities that permit non-administrative users to gain unrestricted access or administrative rights to software or that otherwise bypasses security or audit controls), time bomb or malware or any other codes or instructions that may be used to access, modify, replicate, distort, delete, damage or disable software or data, other software operating systems, computers or equipment with which the software interacts; and
(vii) in the past 12 months, there has been no failure or malfunction of any IT Systems which has caused any material disruption to its business or that of its Subsidiaries. It and its Subsidiaries have implemented reasonable backup, security and disaster recovery technology and procedures.
(b) To its Knowledge, it and its Subsidiaries are compliant in all material respects with their respective privacy policies and contractual commitments to their respective customers and employees, concerning data protection and the privacy and security of Personal Data of such customers and employees, including any applicable Data Protection Laws. Since January 1, 2012, to its Knowledge, it and its Subsidiaries have not experienced any Information Security Breach.
3.22 Real Property; Personal Property.
(a) Set forth in Section 3.22(a) of its Disclosure Letter is a complete list of real property that it or its Subsidiaries own (“Owned Real Property”). With respect to each Owned Real Property, except for such matters that would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect: (i) it or its respective Subsidiary has good and clear record and marketable title to such property, free and clear of any Lien other than Permitted Encumbrances and (ii) there are no outstanding options or right of first refusal to purchase the Owned Real Property, or any portion of the Owned Real Property, or interest therein.
(b) It and its Subsidiaries have a valid and enforceable right to use or a valid and enforceable leasehold interest in, all real property (including all buildings, fixtures and other improvements thereto) material to the conduct of their respective businesses as such businesses are currently being conducted. Neither its nor any of its Subsidiaries’ leasehold interest in any such real property is subject to any Lien, except for Permitted Encumbrances. None of it or any
of its Subsidiaries is in material breach of, or material default under, or has received written notice of any material breach of, or material default under, any Real Property Lease, agreement evidencing any Lien or other agreement affecting any lease, license, or sublease or other agreement (“Real Property Lease”) under which it or any of its Subsidiaries uses or occupies or has a right to use or occupy now or in the future, any real property (“Leased Real Property”), which default remains uncured as of the date of this Agreement.
(c) Each Real Property Lease is valid, binding and in full force and effect, and no termination event or condition or uncured material breach or default on the part of it or any of its Subsidiaries exists under any Real Property Lease. No option has been exercised by it or any of its Subsidiaries under any Real Property Lease, and neither it nor any of its Subsidiaries has subleased, licensed or otherwise granted any Person the right to use or occupy the Leased Real Property or any portion thereof. None of it or any of its Subsidiaries has sold, assigned, transferred, pledged or created or suffered a Lien (except for Permitted Encumbrances) on all or any part of its leasehold interest in the Leased Real Property. As of the date hereof, to its Knowledge, no landlord under any Real Property Lease has indicated that it will not grant its consent to the sublease of the respective Leased Real Property or assignment of such Real Property Lease by the tenant thereunder, or that such landlord will condition its granting of any such consent on the payment of any non de minimis fee.
(d) The Owned Real Property, the Leased Real Property and any buildings or equipment thereon owned or leased by it or its Subsidiaries have no material defects, are in good operating condition and repair and have been reasonably maintained consistent with standards generally followed in the industry (given due account to the age and length of use of same, ordinary wear and tear excepted), are adequate and suitable for their present and intended uses, and, in the case of buildings (including the roofs thereof), are structurally sound.
3.23 Permits; Compliance with Laws.
(a) Except as would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect, each of it and its Subsidiaries is, and since January 1, 2012, has been, in possession of all franchises, grants, authorizations, licenses, easements, variances, exceptions, consents, certificates, approvals and other permits of any Governmental Entity (“Permits”) necessary for it to own, lease and operate its properties and assets or to carry on its business as it is currently being conducted (collectively, its “Required Permits”), and all such Required Permits are in full force and effect. Except as would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect, no suspension or cancellation of any of the Required Permits is pending or threatened, and no such suspension or cancellation will result from consummation of the Transactions.
(b) Except as would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect, it and each of its Subsidiaries is, and since January 1, 2012 has been, in compliance with: (i) all Laws applicable to it or such Subsidiary or its respective business or properties and (ii) all its Required Permits. Neither it nor any of its Subsidiaries is subject to any Order of, or any continuing, pending or threatened in writing formal investigation or formal inquiry by, any Governmental Entity except as would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect.
(c) Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, except as would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect, it and each of its Subsidiaries is, and since January 1, 2012 has been, in compliance with: (i) the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, and any rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, (ii) the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Convention Against Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions and legislation implementing such Convention and (iii) the United Kingdom Bribery Act of 2010, as amended, and any rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. Except as would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect, neither it or any of its Subsidiaries nor, to its Knowledge, any of their respective directors, officers, employees or agents, does any business with or involving the government of, any Person or project located in any country targeted by any of the economic sanctions promulgated by any Executive Order issued by the President of the United States or administered by the United States Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, or knowingly supports or facilitates any such business or project, in each case other than as permitted under such economic sanctions. Neither it nor any of its Subsidiaries has received any written notice of violation (or allegation of violation) of such sanctions from any Governmental Entity. This Section 3.23 does not relate to its SEC Reports, financial statements or compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (as associated rules and regulations), which are the subject of Section 3.10, Section 3.11 and Section 3.12.
3.24 Takeover Statutes.
(a) No “fair price,” “moratorium,” “control share acquisition,” “interested shareholder” or other anti-takeover statute or regulation (collectively, “Takeover Statutes”) would reasonably be expected to restrict or prohibit this Agreement, the Amalgamation Agreement or the Transactions by reason of it being a party to this Agreement and the Amalgamation Agreement, or performing its obligations hereunder and thereunder and consummating the Amalgamation and the other Transactions.
3.25 Interested Party Transactions.
(a) There are no undisclosed transactions, Contracts, arrangements or understandings between: (i) it and any of its Subsidiaries, on the one hand, and (ii) any director, officer or employee of it or any Person (other than it or its Subsidiaries) which owns of record or beneficially any equity interest in it or any of its Subsidiaries, on the other hand, of the type that would be required to be disclosed under Item 404 of Regulation S-K of the SEC (each, an “Interested Party Transaction”).
3.26 Reserves.
(a) The insurance reserves for claims, losses (including incurred, but not reported, losses), loss adjustment expenses (whether allocated or unallocated) and unearned premiums of each of its Insurance Subsidiaries contained in its Statutory Statements: (i) were, except as otherwise noted in the applicable Statutory Statement, determined in all material respects in accordance with generally accepted actuarial standards consistently applied as in effect at such time, except as otherwise noted in the financial statements and notes thereto
included in such Statutory Statements, (ii) were computed on the basis of methodologies consistent with those used in computing the corresponding reserves in prior fiscal years, except as otherwise noted in the financial statements and the notes thereto included in such Statutory Statements, and (iii) satisfied the requirements of all applicable Laws in all material respects.
(b) With respect to its Insurance Subsidiaries, it has provided or made available to the other party true and complete copies of: (i) all actuarial reports by independent external actuaries and (ii) all material internal actuarial reports, in each case, prepared on or after January 1, 2012 and prior to the date of this Agreement. The information and data furnished by it and its Insurance Subsidiaries to its actuaries in connection with the preparation of such actuarial reports were (i) obtained from the books and records of the relevant Insurance Subsidiary and (ii) accurate in all material respects for the periods covered in such reports.
3.27 Insurance Policies. Except as would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect: (i) all property and liability insurance policies maintained by it and its Subsidiaries covering it and its Subsidiaries are in full force and effect and all premiums due and payable thereon have been paid, (ii) neither it nor any of its Subsidiaries is in breach or default of any such insurance policies or has taken any action or failed to take any action which, with notice or the lapse of time or both, would constitute such a breach or default or permit termination or modification of any such insurance policies, and (iii) no event has occurred which, with notice or lapse of time, would constitute a breach or default or permit termination or modification under such insurance policies.
3.28 Registration Statement; Joint Proxy Statement. None of the information supplied or to be supplied by it for inclusion or incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form S-4 (such registration statement as it may be amended or supplemented and including any such amendments or supplements, the “Registration Statement”) to be filed with the SEC by the Amalgamated Company, Axis or PRE under the Securities Act, including the prospectus relating to the Amalgamated Company Share Issuance (as it may be amended or supplemented and including any such amendments or supplements, the “Prospectus”) and the joint proxy statement and form of proxies relating to the special meetings of the shareholders of PRE and Axis to be held, in the case of Axis, to consider the Axis Bye-Law Amendment and to consider and obtain the Requisite PRE Vote and the Requisite Axis Vote (each a “Shareholders Meeting”) (as it may be amended, supplemented or modified and including any such amendments or supplements, the “Joint Proxy Statement”), at the time the Registration Statement becomes effective or, in the case of the Joint Proxy Statement, at the date of mailing and at the date of the Axis Shareholders Meeting or the PRE Shareholders Meeting, will contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. Each of the Registration Statement and Joint Proxy Statement, except for such portions thereof that relate only to PRE and its Subsidiaries or Axis and its Subsidiaries, will comply as to form in all material respects with the provisions of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act.
3.29 Opinion of Financial Advisor.
(a) In the case of Axis, the Axis Board has received the opinion of its financial advisor, Goldman, Sachs & Co., dated January 25, 2015, to the effect that, as of such date and based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions set forth therein, the Axis Exchange Ratio is fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of Axis Common Shares.
(b) In the case of PRE, the PRE Board has received the opinion of its financial advisor, Credit Suisse, dated January 25, 2015, to the effect that, as of such date and based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions set forth therein, the PRE Exchange Ratio is fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of PRE Common Shares.
3.30 Brokers or Finders. Other than, in the case of PRE, Credit Suisse and, in the case of Axis, Goldman, Sachs & Co., no agent, broker, investment banker, financial advisor is or will be entitled to any broker’s, finder’s or other similar commission or fee in connection with the Transactions based upon arrangements made by or on behalf of it or any of its Subsidiaries.
3.31 Reorganization. Neither it nor any of its Subsidiaries has taken or agreed to take any action, has failed to take any action, or has knowledge of any fact, agreement, plan or other circumstance, that would be reasonably likely to prevent or impede the Amalgamation from qualifying as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code.
3.32
(a) Environmental Matters. (a) Except as would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect: (i) no notice, notification, demand, request for information, citation, summons or complaint has been received, no order, judgment decree or injunction has been issued or is otherwise in effect, no penalty has been assessed, and no investigation, action, claim, suit or proceeding is pending or, to its Knowledge, is threatened with respect to it or any of its Subsidiaries (or any of their respective predecessors) that relates to any Environmental Law or Hazardous Substance; (ii) the Company and its Subsidiaries (and their respective predecessors) are and have at all times been in compliance with all Environmental Laws; and (iii) there are no liabilities or obligations of it or any of its Subsidiaries of any kind whatsoever, whether accrued, contingent, absolute, determined, determinable or otherwise arising under or relating to any Environmental Law or any Hazardous Substance and there is no condition, situation or set of circumstances that could reasonably be expected to result in or be the basis for any such liability or obligation.
(b) Other than as does not identify any actual or potential material violation of or material liability under Environmental Law, there has been no environmental investigation, study, audit, test, review or other analysis conducted of which it has Knowledge in relation to its or its Subsidiaries’ current or prior business or any property or facility now or previously owned or leased by it or any of its Subsidiaries that has not been delivered to the other party at least five Business Days prior to the date hereof.
(c) The consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby require no filings to be made or actions to be taken pursuant to the New Jersey Industrial Site Recovery Act or the “Connecticut Property Transfer Law” (Sections 22a-134 through 22-134e of the Connecticut General Statutes).
3.33 No Other Representations or Warranties. Except in the case of fraud and except for the representations and warranties set forth in this Article III, PRE acknowledges and agrees that Axis is not and Axis acknowledges and agrees that PRE is not making, nor shall have been deemed to have made, any representation or warranty of any kind whatsoever, express or implied, at law or in equity, and PRE with respect to Axis and Axis with respect to PRE, disclaims any such representation or warranty.
ARTICLE IV
MUTUAL COVENANTS OF THE PARTIES
4.1 Preparation of Proxy Statement; Shareholder Meetings.
(a) As promptly as practicable following the date of this Agreement: (i) Axis and PRE shall jointly prepare and shall cause to be filed with the SEC the Joint Proxy Statement in preliminary form and (ii) PRE shall prepare, together with Axis, and cause to be filed with the SEC the Registration Statement in preliminary form, in which the Joint Proxy Statement will be included as a prospectus.
(b) Each of Axis and PRE shall use its reasonable best efforts to have the Joint Proxy Statement cleared by the SEC and the Registration Statement declared effective by the SEC as promptly as practicable after such filing and to maintain the effectiveness of the Registration Statement through the Effective Time. Each of Axis and PRE shall promptly furnish all information concerning it or its shareholders and their respective Affiliates to the other, including all information required by the Securities Act and the Exchange Act to be included therein, and provide such other assistance, as may be reasonably requested in connection with the preparation, filing and distribution of the Registration Statement and the Joint Proxy Statement. The Joint Proxy Statement and the Registration Statement shall include all information reasonably requested by such other party to be included therein. Each of PRE and Axis shall promptly correct any information provided by it for use in the Joint Proxy Statement or the Registration Statement, as applicable, if and to the extent such information shall have become false or misleading in any material respect. Each of Axis and PRE shall, as promptly as practicable after the receipt thereof, provide the other party with copies of any written comments and advise the other party of any oral comments with respect to the Joint Proxy Statement and the Registration Statement received from the SEC, including any request from the SEC for amendments or supplements to the Registration Statement or Joint Proxy Statement or for additional information, and shall provide the other party with copies of all written correspondence between it and its Representatives, on the one hand, and the SEC, on the other hand. Each of PRE and Axis shall use their reasonable best efforts to respond as promptly as reasonably practicable to any comments received from the SEC concerning the Joint Proxy Statement and the Registration Statement and to resolve such comments with the SEC. Prior to filing the Registration Statement or mailing the Joint Proxy Statement or responding to any comments of the SEC with respect thereto, each of Axis and PRE shall: (i) provide the other with a reasonable opportunity to review and comment on such document or response or amendment or supplement as applicable (including the proposed final version of such document or response) and (ii) give due consideration to incorporating in such document or response any comments reasonably proposed by the other party. Each of Axis and PRE shall advise the other party,
promptly after receipt of notice thereof, of the time of effectiveness of the Registration Statement, the issuance of any stop order relating thereto or the suspension of the qualification of Amalgamated Company Common Shares issuable in the Amalgamated Company Share Issuance for offering or sale in any jurisdiction, and each of Axis and PRE shall use its reasonable best efforts to have any such stop order or suspension lifted, reversed or otherwise terminated. Each of Axis and PRE shall also use its reasonable best efforts to take any other action (other than qualifying to do business in any jurisdiction in which it is not so qualified on the date of this Agreement) required to be taken under any applicable securities Laws in connection with the Transactions, with respect to the issuance of Amalgamated Company Common Shares pursuant to the Amalgamated Company Share Issuance and the treatment of PRE Options, Axis Options, PRE SARs, PRE Other Share-Based Awards and Axis Other Share-Based Awards pursuant to Section 2.3, and PRE and Axis shall respectively furnish all information concerning PRE, the PRE Shareholders, Axis, the Axis Shareholders and holders of PRE Options, Axis Options, PRE SARs, PRE Other Share-Based Awards and Axis Other Share-Based Awards as may be reasonably requested in connection with any such action.
(c) If, at any time prior to the Effective Time, either PRE or Axis obtains Knowledge of any information pertaining to it or previously provided by it for inclusion in the Registration Statement or the Joint Proxy Statement that would require any amendment or supplement to the Registration Statement or the Joint Proxy Statement so that any such document would not include any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact necessary in order to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, such party shall promptly advise the other party thereof and Axis and PRE shall cooperate in the prompt filing with the SEC of any necessary amendment or supplement to the Joint Proxy Statement and the Registration Statement and, as required by applicable Law, in disseminating the information contained in such amendment or supplement to the shareholders of the Axis and of PRE.
(d) Axis shall, in accordance with its Bye-Laws and applicable Law, as soon as practicable following the date the Registration Statement is declared effective by the SEC: (i) duly call, give notice of, convene and hold a meeting of the shareholders of Axis (the “Axis Shareholders Meeting”) within 45 days of such declaration of effectiveness for purposes of seeking and obtaining the approval of the Axis Bye-Law Amendment and the Requisite Axis Vote and (ii) in furtherance thereof, use its reasonable best efforts to cause the Joint Proxy Statement to be distributed to its shareholders within seven days of such declaration of effectiveness. Without the prior written consent of PRE, no proposals other than the Axis Bye-Law Amendment, the Requisite Axis Vote and routine proposals required in connection therewith shall be included in the Joint Proxy Statement or transacted at the Axis Shareholders Meeting. Unless the Axis Board shall have made a Change of Recommendation, as permitted by Section 5.8(d), Axis shall: (A) use its reasonable best efforts to solicit or cause to be solicited from its shareholders proxies to secure the Axis Bye-Law Amendment and the Requisite Axis Vote, (B) include the Axis Board Recommendation in the Joint Proxy Statement and (C) take all other actions necessary or advisable to secure the Axis Bye-Law Amendment and the Requisite Axis Vote. Axis agrees that, unless this Agreement has been terminated in accordance with Section 7.1, its obligations pursuant to this Section 4.1 shall not be affected by the commencement, public proposal, public disclosure or communication to Axis of any Acquisition Proposal with respect to Axis or by a Change of Recommendation by the Axis Board.
(e) PRE shall, in accordance with its Bye-Laws and applicable Law, as soon as practicable following the date the Registration Statement is declared effective by the SEC: (i) duly call, give notice of, convene and hold a meeting of the shareholders of PRE (the “PRE Shareholders Meeting”) within 45 days of such declaration of effectiveness for purposes of seeking and obtaining the Requisite PRE Vote and (ii) in furtherance thereof, use its reasonable best efforts to cause the Joint Proxy Statement to be distributed to its shareholders as soon as practicable within seven days of such declaration of effectiveness. Without the prior written consent of Axis, no proposals other than the Requisite PRE Vote and routine proposals required in connection therewith shall be included in the Joint Proxy Statement or transacted at the PRE Shareholders Meeting. Unless the PRE Board shall have made a Change of Recommendation, as permitted by Section 5.8(d), PRE shall: (A) use its reasonable best efforts to solicit or cause to be solicited from its shareholders, in accordance with applicable Law, its Bye-Laws and the rules and regulations of the NYSE, proxies to secure the Requisite PRE Vote, (B) shall include the PRE Board Recommendation in the Joint Proxy Statement and (C) take all other actions necessary or advisable to secure the Requisite PRE Vote. PRE agrees that, unless this Agreement has been terminated in accordance with Section 7.1, its obligations pursuant to this Section 4.1 shall not be affected by the commencement, public proposal, public disclosure or communication to PRE of any Acquisition Proposal with respect to PRE or by a Change of Recommendation by the PRE Board.
(f) Axis and PRE shall use their commercially reasonable efforts to cause the Axis Shareholders Meeting and the PRE Shareholders Meeting to occur on the same date. Following the Shareholder Meetings and at or prior to the Closing, each of Axis and PRE shall deliver to the corporate secretary of the other party a certificate setting forth the voting results from its respective Shareholder Meeting.
4.2 Access to Information; Confidentiality. Subject to applicable Law, each of PRE and Axis shall, and shall cause each of its respective Subsidiaries to, permit the other and its Representatives, during the period before the earlier of the termination of this Agreement pursuant to Article VII and the Effective Time, to: (i) have reasonable access for reasonable purposes related to the consummation of the Transactions, during normal business times and upon reasonable advance written notice, to the other party’s premises, properties, books, records, contracts and documents and (ii) promptly furnish to the other party such information concerning its business, personnel and prospects as such other party may reasonably request; provided, that, PRE, Axis and their respective Representatives shall conduct any such activities in such a manner as not to interfere unreasonably with the business or operations of the other party; provided, further, that neither PRE nor Axis shall be obligated to provide such access or information if doing so could violate applicable Law or a Contract or obligation of confidentiality owing to a third party, or waive the protection of an attorney-client privilege or other legal privilege, in each case to the extent existing as of the date hereof (as long as PRE or Axis, as the case may be, has used commercially reasonable efforts to obtain the consent of any third party required thereunder). Information exchanged pursuant to this Section 4.2 shall be subject to the confidentiality agreement, dated January 17, 2015, between Axis and PRE (the “Confidentiality Agreement”). No investigation conducted under this Section 4.2 will affect or be deemed to modify any representation or warranty made in this Agreement, and PRE and Axis agree that the Confidentiality Agreement shall terminate immediately upon the Closing.
4.3 Filings; Reasonable Best Efforts; Notification.
(a) Upon the terms and subject to the conditions of this Agreement and in accordance with applicable Laws, each of the parties shall use its reasonable best efforts to take, or cause to be taken, all actions, and to do, or cause to be done, and to assist and cooperate with the other parties in doing, all things necessary, proper or advisable on their part to consummate and make effective, in the most expeditious manner practicable and in any event prior to the End Date, the Amalgamation and the other Transactions, including: (i) the obtaining of all necessary actions or nonactions, waivers, consents, licenses, permits, authorizations, orders and approvals from Governmental Entities and the making of all other necessary registrations and filings, (ii) the obtaining of all consents, approvals or waivers from third parties that are necessary or desirable or required in connection with the Transactions and material to the business of Axis or PRE, as the case may be, (iii) the preparation of the Joint Proxy Statement and the Registration Statement, including the Prospectus, (iv) the execution and delivery of any additional instruments necessary to consummate any of the Transactions and (v) the providing of all such information concerning such party, its Affiliates and its Affiliates’ officers, directors, employees and partners as may reasonably be requested or necessary in connection with any statement, filing, action or application or any of the matters described in this Section 4.3.
(b) In furtherance and not in limitation of the foregoing, each of PRE and Axis agrees to make the appropriate initial application filings and notifications required by the Transaction Approvals as promptly as practicable after the date hereof, including in connection with approvals required pursuant to the HSR Act and filings and notifications with respect to the Bermuda Monetary Authority and Registrar. Subject to applicable Laws relating to the exchange of information, Axis and PRE shall have the right to review in advance and, to the extent practicable, each will consult with the other on and consider in good faith the views of the other in connection with, all the information relating to Axis or PRE, as the case may be, and any of their respective Affiliates, that appears in any filing made with, or written materials submitted to, any third party or any Governmental Entity in connection with this Agreement, the Amalgamation Agreement and the Transactions. In exercising the foregoing rights, each of Axis and PRE shall act reasonably and as promptly as practicable. None of PRE, Axis or any of their respective Affiliates shall permit any of their respective Representatives to participate in any meeting with any Governmental Entity (including any Insurance Regulator) in respect of any filings, investigation or other inquiry relating to this Agreement, the Amalgamation Agreement and the Transactions unless it consults with the other party in advance and, to the extent permitted by such Governmental Entity and applicable Laws, gives the other party the opportunity to attend and participate at such meeting.
(c) Subject to applicable Laws and as required by any Governmental Entity, Axis and PRE shall each keep the other apprised of the status of matters relating to the consummation of the Transactions, including promptly furnishing the other party with copies of non-routine notices or other communications received by Axis, PRE or any of their respective Affiliates, as the case may be, from any third party or any Governmental Entity with respect to the Transactions. If Axis or PRE receives a request for information or documentary material from any such Governmental Entity that is related to the Transactions, then such party will endeavor in good faith to make, or cause to be made, as soon as reasonably practicable and after consultation with the other party, an appropriate response to such request. Axis and its Affiliates
shall advise PRE, and PRE and its Affiliates shall advise Axis, prior to making or entering into any understandings, undertakings or agreements (oral or written) in connection with the Transactions with the Federal Trade Commission, the Department of Justice, any Insurance Regulator or any other Governmental Entity or any private party challenging the Transactions.
(d) In connection with subsections 4.3(a), 4.3(b) and 4.3(c) above: (i) neither party nor any of its Subsidiaries shall be required to sell, divest, hold separate, or otherwise dispose of any of its or its Subsidiaries respective businesses, product lines or assets, (ii) the Amalgamated Company and its Subsidiaries shall not be required to conduct the businesses of Axis and its Subsidiaries and PRE and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole after giving effect to the Amalgamation in a specified manner and (iii) no party shall be required to agree to (A) take any of the actions set forth in clause (i) or (ii), (B) take any other action or (C) any restriction, limitation or condition that, in the case of any of clause (i), (ii) or this clause (iii), would or would reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on the Amalgamated Company and its Subsidiaries (including Axis and its Subsidiaries and PRE and its Subsidiaries), taken as a whole after giving effect to the Amalgamation (such Material Adverse Effect, a “Regulatory Material Adverse Effect”).
4.4 Tax-Free Treatment. Each of the parties shall, and shall cause each of its Subsidiaries to, use its reasonable best efforts to (i) cause the Amalgamation to constitute a “reorganization” under Section 368(a) of the Code, (ii) not take any action or fail to take any action required hereby that could reasonably be expected to prevent or impede the Amalgamation from qualifying as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code and (iii) to cooperate with one another in obtaining an opinion from Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, counsel to PRE (“PRE’s Counsel”), as provided for in Section 6.2(d) and an opinion from Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, counsel to Axis (“Axis’s Counsel”), as provided for in Section 6.3(d). In connection therewith, Axis and PRE shall execute and deliver officer’s certificates containing appropriate representations at such time or times as may be reasonably requested by counsel, including in connection with any filing of the Registration Statement and the delivery of the opinions described in Section 6.2(d) and Section 6.3(d), for purposes of rendering opinions with respect to the tax treatment of the Amalgamation.
4.5 Public Announcements. The initial press release following the execution of this Agreement shall be a joint press release by the parties. Except: (i) as required by applicable Law or requirements of the NYSE (and in that event only if time does not permit) or (ii) with respect to any Change of Recommendation by the Axis Board or the PRE Board that has occurred pursuant to Section 5.8, at all times prior to the earlier of the Closing or termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1, Axis and PRE shall consult with each other before issuing, and shall give each other the opportunity to review and approve, any press release or other public statement relating to this Agreement or any of the Transactions and shall (A) not issue any such press release or make such other public statement or comment prior to such review and subsequent approval and (B) include in such press release or other public statement or comment all comments reasonably proposed by the other party.
4.6 Section 16 Matters. Prior to the Effective Time, Axis and PRE shall take such steps as may be reasonably necessary or advisable to cause the respective dispositions or acquisitions of Axis Common Shares (including derivative securities thereof) and PRE Common
Shares (including derivative securities thereof) resulting from the Transactions by each individual who is a director or officer of Axis or PRE (as the case may be) subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act, or who will become subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act, to be exempt under Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act.
4.7 Notification of Certain Matters.
(a) PRE shall promptly notify Axis, and Axis shall promptly notify PRE, of: (i) any communication from any Person alleging that the consent of such Person (or another Person) is or may be required in connection with the Transactions, (ii) any communication from any Governmental Entity in connection with the Transactions, (iii) any Legal Actions threatened or commenced against or otherwise affecting PRE or any of its Subsidiaries (in the case of PRE) or Axis or any of its Subsidiaries (in the case of Axis) that are related to the Transactions (including any Legal Action brought by a shareholder of PRE or Axis, as applicable, in accordance with Section 4.7(b)) or (iv) any event, change, occurrence, circumstance or development between the date of this Agreement and the Effective Time which causes or is reasonably likely to cause a Material Adverse Effect.
(b) PRE shall promptly advise Axis, and Axis shall promptly advise PRE, orally and in writing, of any Legal Action brought by any shareholder of PRE or Axis, either derivatively, individually or on behalf of a putative class of shareholders as applicable, against PRE or Axis or its respective directors or officers relating to this Agreement or the Transactions. Subject to Section 2.1(e) and (f), PRE shall give Axis, or Axis shall give PRE, as the case may be, the opportunity to participate, in any such Legal Action, including the defense or settlement of any Legal Action initiated by any shareholder of PRE or Axis, either derivatively, individually or on behalf of a putative class of shareholders as applicable, or any of its respective directors or officers relating to the Transactions, and no such settlement shall be agreed to without the prior written consent of Axis or PRE, as applicable, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed.
ARTICLE V
ADDITIONAL COVENANTS OF THE PARTIES
5.1 Conduct of Operations of Axis and PRE. Except as required by applicable Law as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement or as set forth in Section 5.1 of its Disclosure Letter, without the prior written consent of the other party, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed, PRE and Axis shall, and shall cause each of its respective Subsidiaries to: (i) conduct its operations only in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice and (ii) use its commercially reasonable efforts to maintain and preserve intact its business, maintain its Permits and to preserve the goodwill of its customers, cedents, reinsureds, retrocessionaires, reinsurance brokers, regulators, suppliers and other Persons with whom it has material business relationships. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, from the date of this Agreement and until the Closing, and except as required by applicable Law, expressly provided in this Agreement or set forth in Section 5.1 of its Disclosure Letter, PRE and Axis shall not, and shall not permit any of its respective Subsidiaries to, take any
of the following actions, without the prior written consent of the other party (which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed):
(a) Amend or propose to amend its Memorandum of Association or Bye-Laws (other than, in the case of Axis, the Axis Bye-Law Amendment) or other Organizational Documents (whether by merger, amalgamation, consolidation or otherwise) or waive any requirement thereof;
(b) Declare or pay, or propose to declare or pay, any dividends on or make other distributions in respect of any of its share capital, whether in cash, shares or property or any combination thereof, except for: (i) dividends paid by a direct or indirect wholly owned Subsidiary to it or its other wholly owned Subsidiaries and (ii) ordinary course quarterly cash dividends on PRE Common Shares and PRE Preferred Shares or Axis Common Shares and Axis Preferred Shares, as applicable, with record and payment dates consistent with past practice, provided, that, in the case of this clause (ii), (A) the quarterly cash dividends payable in respect of PRE Common Shares shall be permitted to increase to an amount not to exceed $0.70 per share per quarter, (B) the quarterly cash dividends payable with respect of the Axis Common Shares shall not be increased and (C) each of PRE and Axis shall be entitled to pay immediately prior to the Effective Time on PRE Common Shares and Axis Common Shares, respectively, for the quarter in which the Closing Date occurs a pro rata dividend for the period from the first day of such quarter until the day immediately preceding the Closing Date;
(c) (i) Adjust, subdivide, consolidate or reclassify its share capital or issue, deliver or sell or authorize or propose the issuance, delivery or sale of any other securities in respect of, in lieu of or in substitution for, its share capital or that of its Subsidiaries, (ii) redeem, purchase or otherwise acquire, or offer to purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire, directly or indirectly, any shares or any securities convertible or exchangeable into or exercisable for any shares, (iii) grant any Person any right or option to acquire any shares, (iv) issue, deliver or sell (other than repurchases in the ordinary course pursuant to employee benefit plans or employment agreements, in each case in effect on the date hereof) any additional shares or any securities convertible or exchangeable into or exercisable for any shares or such securities or (v) enter into any Contract, understanding or arrangement with respect to the sale, voting, registration or repurchase of its share capital, other than, as may be applicable in each case: (A) the issuance of Axis Common Shares or PRE Common Shares required to be issued upon the exercise or settlement of share options or other equity-related awards outstanding on the date hereof under the Axis Share Plans or the PRE Share Plans, respectively, in effect on the date hereof (including any Axis Common Shares or PRE Common Shares issued for any associated payment of exercise price and/or withholding taxes and the purchase of PRE Common Shares under the Purchase Plans pursuant to Section 5.5(a)), (B) issuances, sales or transfers by a wholly owned Subsidiary of share capital, to it or another of its wholly owned Subsidiaries, and (C) grants of equity awards to its or its Subsidiaries’ employees in the amounts, and with the vesting schedule, set forth in Section 5.1(c) of its Disclosure Letter;
(d) Except as required under any Benefit Plan in effect as of the date of this Agreement: and except with respect to any bonuses accrued but unpaid as of December 31, 2014 pursuant to a Benefit Plan disclosed in Section 3.18(a) or Section 3.18(f) (i) grant or increase any severance, change in control, retention or termination payments or benefits or any equity or
equity-based compensation to any of its Associates (except for equity awards pursuant to Section 5.1(c)(C) or set forth on Section 5.1 of the Disclosure Letter or granted in the ordinary course of business to non-employee directors and non-equity based compensation in the ordinary course of business with respect to employees who are not directors or executive officers), (ii) increase, or commit to increase, the compensation, bonus or benefits of any of its Associates (except for equity awards pursuant to Section 5.1(c)(C) and non-equity in the ordinary course of business with respect to employees who are not directors or executive officers), (iii) establish, adopt, terminate or amend any Benefit Plan or any benefit plan, agreement, program, policy, commitment or other arrangement that would be a Benefit Plan if it were in existence as of the date of this Agreement (other than routine changes to welfare plans), (iv) take any affirmative action to accelerate the vesting or payment of, or fund or in any other way secure the payment of, compensation or benefits under any Benefit Plan, (v) hire or promote any Associate, or (vi) terminate, without “cause,” any of its employees, in each case of (v) and (vi) other than in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practice; provided, that upon notification of and consultation with the other party during the process, it may hire employees to fill a vacancy as a result of the termination of employment of an employee on the date of this Agreement so long as (A) such terminated employee’s aggregate annual compensation and benefits during 2014 were less than $500,000 (with applicable adjustments made for periods of employment of less than a full calendar year) and (B) such replacement employee’s aggregate annual compensation and benefits (with applicable adjustments made for periods of employment of less than a full calendar year) are not in excess of the compensation and benefits that were provided to the terminated employee during 2014 (with applicable adjustments made for periods of employment of less than a full calendar year);
(e) Acquire, by merger, amalgamation, consolidation, acquisition of equity interests or assets, or otherwise, any business or any corporation, partnership, limited liability company, joint venture or other Person or division thereof, or any substantial portion thereof, or (ii) sell, lease, assign, transfer, license, encumber, abandon or otherwise dispose of, or agree to sell, lease, assign, transfer, license, encumber, abandon or otherwise dispose of, any of its material assets, product lines, businesses, rights or properties (including capital stock or share capital of its Subsidiaries and indebtedness of others held by it and its Subsidiaries), other than as may be applicable in each case (A) transactions between it and any of its wholly owned Subsidiaries or transactions between any such wholly owned Subsidiaries, (B) the acquisition or disposition of Investment Assets in the ordinary course of business and in accordance with its Investment Guidelines, (C) acquisitions or dispositions, including in either case by lease or license, of immaterial or obsolete supplies, products, office equipment, furnishings, fixtures or other tangible assets (including software) in the ordinary course of business, and (D) the creation or incurrence of a Permitted Encumbrance;
(f) Establish, adopt or enter into any collective bargaining agreement or similar labor agreement;
(g) Make or authorize any capital expenditures individually in excess of $2,000,000;
(h) (i) Enter into, terminate, modify or amend in any material respect any Material Contract, (ii) enter into any new Ceded Reinsurance Contract except in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practice, (iii) enter into any Contract that would limit or otherwise restrict it or any of its Subsidiaries or any of their successors, or that would, after the Effective Time, limit or otherwise restrict the Amalgamated Company or any of its Subsidiaries or any of their successors, from engaging or competing in any line of business, in any geographic area or with any Person in any material respect, (iv) enter into, modify or amend any Contract constituting or relating to an Interested Party Transaction, (v) enter into, modify or amend any Contract involving the assumption or insurance by it of any of its Subsidiaries of liabilities other than in material compliance with their existing risk management and underwriting policies, practices and guidelines, (vi) terminate, cancel, request any material change or waive any of its material rights in connection with any Material Contract, Ceded Reinsurance Contract or Real Property Lease or (vii) enter, to the extent material, any new lines of business, classes or any markets in which it and its Subsidiaries do not operate as of the date of this Agreement;
(i) Incur, assume, guarantee or prepay any indebtedness, issue or sell any debt securities or warrants or other rights to acquire any debt securities of it or any of its Subsidiaries, or enter into any “keep well” or other agreement to maintain any financial condition of another Person, or enter into any swap or hedging transaction or other derivative agreements, other than: (i) indebtedness incurred under the PRE Credit Facilities (in the case of PRE) or the Axis Credit Facilities (in the case of Axis), as applicable, to support the insurance and reinsurance obligations of its Insurance Subsidiaries in the ordinary course of their business, including the replacement of existing or maturing letters of credit issued thereunder, (ii) any amendment or replacement of the PRE Credit Facilities or the Axis Credit Facilities (as the case may be) in connection with the Transactions, (iii) indebtedness for borrowed money among it and any of its wholly-owned Subsidiaries or among any of its wholly-owned Subsidiaries and (iv) any swap or hedging transaction or other derivative agreements entered into: (A) in the ordinary course of business in connection with Investment Assets and in accordance with its Investment Guidelines or (B) in the ordinary course of business in connection with its weather and commodities business;
(j) (i) Except as provided in Schedule 5.1(j) make any loans, advances or capital contributions to, or investments in, any other Person, other than to any of its wholly-owned Subsidiaries or (ii) make, forgive or discharge, in whole or in part, any loans or advances to any of its or its Subsidiaries’ current or former Associates;
(k) Change the accounting policies or procedures of it or any of its Subsidiaries, other than as required by changes in applicable Laws, GAAP, Regulation S-X of the SEC or Applicable SAP;
(l) Change any material method of Tax accounting, settle or compromise any audit or other proceeding relating to a material amount of Tax, make or change any material Tax election or file any material Tax Return (including any material amended Tax Return), agree to an extension or waiver of the statute of limitations with respect to the assessment or determination of a material amount of Taxes, enter into any closing agreement with respect to any material amount of Tax or surrender any right to claim any material Tax refund;
(m) Alter or amend in any material respect any existing underwriting, claim handling, loss control, investment, reserving or actuarial practice, guideline or policy or any
material assumption underlying any reserves or actuarial practice or policy, except as may be required by GAAP, Applicable SAP or applicable Laws;
(n) Settle or compromise, or offer to do the same, any Legal Action, in each case made or pending against, or made by or contemplated to be made by, as applicable, it or any of its Subsidiaries, or any of their officers and directors in their capacities as such, other than the settlement of any Legal Actions that: (i) is solely for monetary damages for an amount not to exceed $500,000 for any such settlement individually or $2,000,000 in the aggregate, or (ii) is in the ordinary course for claims under Policies and Reinsurance Contracts within applicable policy or contractual limits;
(o) Acquire or dispose of any Investment Assets in any manner inconsistent with its Investment Guidelines;
(p) Amend, modify or otherwise change its Investment Guidelines in any material respect;
(q) Adopt or enter into any plan or agreement of complete or partial liquidation or dissolution, merger, amalgamation, consolidation, restructuring, recapitalization or other reorganization of it or any of its Subsidiaries;
(r) Cancel any material indebtedness or waive any claims or rights of material value, in each case other than in the ordinary course of business;
(s) Abandon, modify, waive or terminate any material Permit; or
(t) Agree, authorize or commit to do any of the foregoing.
5.2 Bermuda Required Actions. Prior to the Effective Time: (i) PRE shall: (a) procure that the statutory declaration required by Section 108(3) of the Companies Act is duly sworn by one of its officers; and (b) prepare a duly certified copy of the PRE shareholder resolutions evidencing the Requisite PRE Vote and deliver such documents to Axis; and (ii) Axis shall: (a) procure that the statutory declaration required by Section 108(3) of the Companies Act is duly sworn by one of its officers; and (b) prepare a duly certified copy of the Axis shareholder resolutions evidencing the Requisite Axis Vote and deliver such documents to PRE.
5.3 Indemnification; Directors’ and Officers’ Insurance.
(a) From and after the Effective Time, subject to applicable Law, the Amalgamated Company shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless, and provide advancement of expenses to, the present and former officers and directors of PRE and its Subsidiaries and Axis and its Subsidiaries (collectively, the “Indemnified Parties”) against all losses, claims, damages, costs, expenses, liabilities or judgments that are paid in settlement of or in connection with any Legal Action based or arising, in whole or in part, or such Indemnified Party’s service as an officer or director of PRE, Axis or any of their respective Subsidiaries prior to the Effective Time, whether asserted or claimed prior to, at or after, the Effective Time (including acts or omissions occurring in connection with the approval of this Agreement and the consummation of the Transactions) to the fullest extent provided or permitted under PRE’s Organizational
Documents and Axis’s Organizational Documents (as the case may be) and any indemnification agreement entered into between PRE or any of its Subsidiaries and such Indemnified Party, or Axis or any of its Subsidiaries and such Indemnified Party, in each case as in effect as of the date of this Agreement.
(b) The Amalgamated Company shall, at the Effective Time, purchase, a “tail” directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policy, for PRE’s and its Subsidiaries’ present and former directors and officers and Axis’s and its Subsidiaries’ present and former directors and officers who are covered prior to the Effective Time by existing policies of directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, with coverage for six years following the Effective Time and on other terms that provide at least substantially equivalent benefits to the covered persons as such existing policies. If such prepaid “tail policy” has been obtained by the Amalgamated Company, it shall be deemed to satisfy all obligations pursuant to this Section 5.3(b) and the Amalgamated Company shall use its reasonable best efforts to cause such “tail policy” to be maintained in full force and effect for its full term and to honor all of its obligations thereunder.
(c) If the Amalgamated Company or any of its respective successors or assigns: (i) shall consolidate with or merge into any other Person and shall not be the continuing or surviving corporation or entity of such consolidation or merger or (ii) shall transfer all or substantially all of its properties or assets to any Person, then, in each case, the Amalgamated Company or any of its respective successors and assigns, as applicable, shall take such action as may be necessary so that such Person shall assume all of the applicable obligations set forth in this Section 5.3.
(d) This Section 5.3 is intended to be for the benefit of, and shall be enforceable by, each of the Indemnified Parties and their heirs and representatives, and are in addition to, and not in substitution for, any other rights to indemnification or contribution that any such Indemnified Party may have by Contract, applicable Law or otherwise.
5.4 NYSE Listing
. Axis and PRE shall use their respective reasonable best efforts to cause the Amalgamated Company Common Shares issuable pursuant to the Amalgamated Company Share Issuance to be approved for listing on the NYSE, subject to official notice of issuance, at the Closing.
5.5 Employees and Employee Benefits.
(a) Prior to the Effective Time, PRE shall take all actions necessary or required under the ESPP and SSPP (together, the “Purchase Plans”) and any applicable Laws to: (i) ensure that no offering period shall be authorized or commenced on or after the date of this Agreement, (ii) no PRE employees will be permitted to begin participating in the Purchase Plans, and no existing participants in the Purchase Plans will be permitted to make additional deferrals or increase elective deferral rates in respect of the current offering period under such Purchase Plan, in each case, on or after the date of this Agreement and (iii) if the Closing shall occur prior to the end of the offering period in existence under the respective Purchase Plan, on the date of this Agreement, cause the rights of participants in such Purchase Plan, as applicable, with respect to any such offering period then underway to be determined by treating the last Business Day prior to the Effective Time as the last day of such offering period and by making such other pro-
rata adjustments as may be necessary to reflect the shortened offering period but otherwise treating such shortened offering period as a fully effective and completed offering period for all purposes under such Purchase Plan. PRE shall terminate each Purchase Plan in its entirety effective as of the Effective Time. Prior to the Effective Time, PRE shall take all actions (including, if appropriate, amending the terms of the Purchase Plans) that are necessary to give effect to the transactions contemplated by this Section 5.5.
(b) With respect to any employee benefit plan maintained by the Amalgamated Company or any of its Affiliates in which any Continuing Employee becomes a participant, such Continuing Employee shall receive full credit for purposes of eligibility to participate and vesting thereunder (but not for purposes of benefit accrual or vesting of equity compensation) for service with Axis or PRE or any of their respective Subsidiaries (or predecessor employers to the extent Axis or PRE provides such past service credit) to the same extent that such service was recognized as of the Effective Time under a comparable plan of the applicable entity in which the Continuing Employee participated.
5.6 Stock Exchange Delisting. Axis and PRE shall use their reasonable best efforts to cause the PRE Common Shares and the Axis Common Shares to be de-listed from the NYSE and deregistered under the Exchange Act promptly following the Effective Time.
5.7 Financing.
In the event that the parties mutually determine that it is desirable to obtain new credit facilities and/or obtain amendments or waivers under any of the parties’ existing credit facilities or other existing financing arrangements in connection with the Transactions (the “Financing”), the parties shall, and shall cause each of their respective Subsidiaries to, use commercially reasonable efforts to cooperate with each other and to cause their respective directors, officers, employees, agents and representatives to cooperate in connection with the arrangement and consummation of the Financing; provided that: (i) such requested cooperation does not unreasonably interfere with the ongoing operations of a party and its Subsidiaries prior to the Effective Time, and (ii) no party or any of its Subsidiaries shall be required to incur any financial liability under the Financing prior to the Effective Time unless any such liability is contingent upon the occurrence of the Closing and otherwise not material to Axis, PRE and their respective Subsidiaries.
5.8 Acquisition Proposals.
(a) Subject to Section 5.8(c) through Section 5.8(h), each of Axis and PRE agrees that, from the date of this Agreement until the Effective Time or, if earlier, the date of termination of this Agreement in accordance with Article VII, neither it nor any of its Subsidiaries shall, and it shall use its reasonable best efforts to cause its and its Subsidiaries’ directors, officers, employees, agents, investment bankers, attorneys, accountants and other representatives (“Representatives”) not to, directly or indirectly: (i) initiate, solicit or take any action to knowingly facilitate or knowingly encourage any inquiries or requests for information with respect to, the making of, or that could reasonably be expected to result in, an Acquisition Proposal, (ii) enter into, participate or engage in any negotiations concerning, or provide any non-public information or data relating to it or any of its Subsidiaries to any Person or afford access to the resources, properties, assets, books or records of it or any of its Subsidiaries to any Peron relating to, in connection with, or in response to an Acquisition Proposal, or any inquiry or
indication of interest that could reasonably expected to result in an Acquisition Proposal, (iii) approve or recommend, or propose publicly to approve or recommend, any Acquisition Proposal, (iv) approve or recommend, or propose publicly to approve or recommend, or execute or enter into, any letter of intent, agreement in principle, merger or amalgamation agreement, acquisition agreement, option agreement or other similar agreement relating to any Acquisition Proposal (each an “Acquisition Agreement”), (v) terminate, amend, release, modify or fail to enforce any provision (including any standstill or other provision) of, or grant any permission, waiver or request under, any confidentiality, standstill or similar agreement (including an Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement) or obligations of any Person (other than in respect of Axis or PRE, as the case may be) or (vi) propose publicly or commit, authorize or agree to do any of the foregoing relating to any Acquisition Proposal.
(b) Subject to Section 5.8(c) through Section 5.8(h), prior to the Closing, neither the Axis Board or the PRE Board nor any committee thereof shall, directly or indirectly: (7) withhold, withdraw, modify or qualify, or publicly propose to withhold, withdraw, modify or qualify, in a manner adverse to the other party, the Axis Board Recommendation (in the case of Axis) or the PRE Board Recommendation (in the case of PRE), (8) approve, adopt, recommend or declare advisable, or publicly propose to approve, adopt, recommend or declare advisable, any Acquisition Proposal, (9) if a tender offer or exchange offer for any issued and outstanding shares of Axis or PRE (as the case may be) is commenced prior to obtaining the respective Requisite Axis Vote or Requisite PRE Vote, fail to recommend against acceptance of such tender offer or exchange offer by its respective shareholders (including, for these purposes, by taking no position or a neutral position in respect of the acceptance of such tender offer or exchange offer by its shareholders, which shall be deemed to be a failure to recommend against the acceptance of such tender offer or exchange offer) within five Business Days after commencement thereof (or in the event of a change in the terms of the tender offer or exchange offer, within five Business Days of the announcement of such changes), or (10) fail to include the Axis Board Recommendation (in the case of Axis) or PRE Board Recommendation in the (in the case of PRE) in the Joint Proxy Statement (any action described in clauses (i)-(iv) above being referred to as a “Change of Recommendation”).
(c) Notwithstanding the limitations set forth in Section 5.8(a) and Section 5.8(b), until the earlier of receipt of the Requisite Axis Vote (in the case of Axis) or the Requisite PRE Vote (in the case of PRE) and any termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1, if after the date of this Agreement, Axis or PRE, as the case may be, receives a written unsolicited bona fide Acquisition Proposal that the Axis Board (in the case of Axis) or the PRE Board (in the case of PRE) has determined in good faith, after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisors: (i) constitutes a Superior Proposal or (ii) would reasonably be likely to result in a Superior Proposal, then the party receiving such Acquisition Proposal may: (A) furnish or disclose nonpublic information to the Person making such Acquisition Proposal if, prior to furnishing such information, such party receives from the third party an executed Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement and (B) engage in discussions or negotiations with such Person with respect to such Acquisition Proposal, in each case only if the Axis Board or the PRE Board (as the case may be) determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside legal counsel that failure to do so would violate the respective fiduciary duties of the Axis Board or the PRE Board (as the case may be) under applicable Law.
(d) Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, the Axis Board or the PRE Board, at any time prior to the receipt of the Requisite Axis Vote (in the case of Axis) or the Requisite PRE Vote (in the case of PRE), in response to the receipt of a written unsolicited bona fide Acquisition Proposal made or received after the date of this Agreement, shall be permitted to effect a Change of Recommendation, if: (A) the Axis Board or the PRE Board (as the case may be) determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisors, that: (i) failure to make such Change of Recommendation would violate the respective fiduciary duties of the Axis Board or the PRE Board (as the case may be) under applicable Law and (ii) such Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Superior Proposal; provided, that, the PRE Board or the Axis Board (as the case may be) shall not be permitted to make such a Change of Recommendation unless and until (1) at least five Business Days shall have passed following the PRE Board’s or the Axis Board’s respective receipt of a written notice from the party receiving the Superior Proposal (the “Superior Proposal Notice”) that includes such party’s reasons for the Change in Recommendation and the material terms and conditions of any Superior Proposal (including the identity of the party making such proposal and its financing sources (if applicable), the most current version of the proposed agreement relating thereto and any agreement relating to such financing) that is the basis of the proposed Change of Recommendation (it being understood and agreed that any amendment to the financial or other material terms (including the form or allocation of consideration) of such Superior Proposal shall require a new Superior Proposal Notice and a new five Business Day period during which PRE or Axis (as applicable) shall comply with the terms of this Section 5.8), (2) during such five Business Day period (x) the Axis Board or the PRE Board, as applicable, shall have provided the other party with a reasonable opportunity to make any adjustments to the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the Transactions so that such Acquisition Proposal ceases to be a Superior Proposal and shall negotiate with such party in good faith with respect thereto, and (y) the Axis Board or the PRE Board, as applicable, shall have determined in good faith at the end of such notice period and, after considering the results of such negotiations and the revised proposals made by the other party, if any, and after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisor that the Superior Proposal, giving rise to such Superior Proposal Notice, continues to be a Superior Proposal and that the failure to make such a Change in Recommendation would violate its fiduciary duties under applicable Laws, and (3) the PRE Board or the Axis Board, as the case may be, which is effecting such Change in Recommendation has not materially breached its obligations under this Section 5.8.
(e) Notwithstanding any Change of Recommendation or anything contained in this Agreement: (i) PRE or Axis, as the case may be, shall call, give notice of, convene and hold the PRE Shareholders Meeting or Axis Shareholders Meeting (as applicable) for the purpose of obtaining the Requisite PRE Vote or Requisite Axis Vote (as applicable), and nothing contained herein shall relieve PRE or Axis, as the case may be, of such obligation, and such obligation shall not be limited or otherwise affected by the commencement, disclosure, announcement or submission to PRE or Axis of any Acquisition Proposal, as the case may be, (ii) the Joint Proxy Statement and any and all accompanying materials may include appropriate disclosure with respect to such Change of Recommendation if and to the extent the PRE Board or the Axis Board, as the case may be, determines after consultation with outside legal counsel that the failure to include such disclosure would violate applicable Laws and (iii) neither PRE or Axis shall take any action knowingly to facilitate such Acquisition Proposal including without limitation in connection with any approvals, except as required by applicable Law.
(f) Each of Axis and PRE agrees that it and its Subsidiaries shall immediately cease and cause to be terminated any existing activities, solicitations, discussions or negotiations, if any, with any Person or its Representatives (other than the parties and their respective Representatives) conducted prior to the date of this Agreement with respect to any Acquisition Proposal, and shall request that any such Person (together with its Representatives) that has executed a confidentiality agreement in connection with an Acquisition Proposal with it or any of its Subsidiaries within the 24-month period prior to the date hereof and that is in possession of confidential information heretofore furnished by or on behalf of it or its Subsidiaries, to return or destroy such information as promptly as practicable, (ii) immediately take all steps necessary (to the extent reasonably possible)to terminate any approval under any confidentiality, “standstill” or similar provision that may have been heretofore given by Axis or PRE to any Person to make an Acquisition Proposal and (iii) take the necessary steps to promptly inform its and its Subsidiaries’ Representatives of the obligations undertaken in this Section 5.8.
(g) From and after the date of this Agreement, each of Axis and PRE shall promptly orally notify the other party of any request for information or any inquiries, proposals or offers relating to an Acquisition Proposal indicating, in connection with such notice, the name of such Person making such request, inquiry, proposal or offer and the material terms and conditions of any proposals or offers (including the identity of the party making such proposal and its financing sources (if applicable), the most current version of the proposed agreement relating thereto and any agreement relating to such financing) and each of Axis and PRE shall provide to the other party written notice of any such inquiry, proposal or offer within 24 hours of such event and copies of any written or electronic correspondence to or from any Person making an Acquisition Proposal. Each of Axis and PRE shall keep the other party informed orally, as soon as is reasonably practicable, of the status of any Acquisition Proposal, including with respect to the status and terms of any such proposal or offer and whether any such proposal or offer has been withdrawn or rejected and each of Axis and PRE shall provide to the other party written notice of any such withdrawal or rejection and copies of any written proposals or requests for information within 24 hours. Each of Axis and PRE also agrees to provide any information to the other party (not previously provided to the other party) that it is providing to another Person pursuant to this Section 5.8 at substantially the same time it provides such information to such other Person. All information provided to Axis or PRE under this Section 5.8 shall be kept confidential by the receiving party in accordance with the terms of the Confidentiality Agreement.
(h) Nothing contained in this Agreement shall prevent the Axis Board or the PRE Board, as the case may be, from complying with its disclosure obligations to the Axis Shareholders or the PRE Shareholders, respectively, contemplated by Rule 14d-9, 14e-2 or Item 1012(a) of Regulation M-A under the Exchange Act.
5.9 Approvals.
(a) Other than the Requisite Axis Vote and Requisite PRE Vote, each of the parties agree to obtain all requisite board of directors, shareholder and member approvals, to the extent not obtained prior to the date of this Agreement, required to be obtained to consummate the Transactions.
(b) Each of Axis and PRE shall fulfill its obligations, and shall cause each of its Subsidiaries to fulfill each of their respective obligations, to inform and consult, under applicable Law, with any employee representative bodies (including any unions, labor organizations or works councils) which represent employees affected by the Transactions.
ARTICLE VI
CONDITIONS
6.1 Conditions to the Obligations of Each Party. The obligation of each party to consummate the Transactions shall be subject to the satisfaction or waiver on or prior to the Closing Date of each of the following conditions:
(a) Shareholder Approval. Axis shall have obtained the Requisite Axis Vote in accordance with its Bye-Laws and applicable Law, and PRE shall have obtained the Requisite PRE Vote in accordance with its Bye-Laws and applicable Law.
(b) NYSE Listing. The Amalgamated Company Common Shares that are to be issued pursuant to the Amalgamated Company Share Issuance shall have been authorized for listing on the NYSE, subject to official notice of issuance.
(c) Transaction Approvals. All Transaction Approvals shall have been filed, have occurred or been obtained and shall be in full force and effect or the waiting periods applicable thereto shall have terminated or expired, in each case, without any Regulatory Material Adverse Effect.
(d) Registration Statement. The Registration Statement shall have become effective under the Securities Act and shall not be the subject of any stop order or proceedings seeking a stop order.
(e) No Injunctions or Restraints. No Governmental Entity shall have enacted, issued, promulgated, enforced or entered any Laws or Orders (whether temporary, preliminary or permanent) that restrain, enjoin or otherwise prohibit consummation of the Amalgamation or the other Transactions.
6.2 Conditions to Obligations of PRE.
The obligations of PRE to consummate the Transactions shall be subject to the satisfaction of the following conditions unless waived by PRE on or prior to the Closing Date:
(a) Representations and Warranties. (i) The representations and warranties of Axis set forth in Section 3.2(a) (Capitalization) shall be true and correct in all respects, except for de minimis inaccuracies, as though made on and as of the Closing Date (except for representations and warranties made as of a specified date, the accuracy of which will be determined as of that specified date); (ii) the representations and warranties of Axis set forth in Section 3.2(b)-3.2(g) (Capitalization), Section 3.3 (Corporate Authorization), Section 3.5 (Enforceability), Section 3.9 (Vote Required), Section 3.13(ii)-(iii) (Absence of Certain Changes), Section 3.24 (Takeover Statutes) and Section 3.30 (Brokers and Finders), that are not qualified by “materiality” or “Material Adverse Effect” shall be true and correct in all material
respects, and all of such representations that are so qualified by “materiality” or “Material Adverse Effect” shall be true and correct in all respects, in each case as though made on and as of the Closing Date (except for representations and warranties made as of a specified date, the accuracy of which shall be determined as of that specified date); (iii) the representations and warranties contained in Section 3.13(iv) shall be true and correct in all respects and (iv) the other representations and warranties of Axis set forth in this Agreement shall be true and correct in all respects, without regard to any “materiality” or “Material Adverse Effect” qualifications contained therein, as though made on and as of the Closing Date (except for representations and warranties made as of a specified date, the accuracy of which shall be determined as of that specified date), unless the failure or failures of such representations and warranties to be true and correct in all respects would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.
(b) Performance of Obligations of Axis. Axis shall have performed or complied in all material respects with all obligations and covenants required to be performed by it under this Agreement at or prior to the Closing Date.
(c) Certification. PRE shall have received a certificate signed on behalf of Axis by the Chief Executive Officer or the Chief Financial Officer of Axis, certifying that the conditions set forth in Section 6.2(a), Section 6.2(b) and Section 6.2(f) have been satisfied.
(d) Opinion of Tax Counsel. PRE shall have received a written tax opinion from PRE’s Counsel, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to Axis, dated as of the Closing Date, to the effect that for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the Amalgamation will constitute a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. In rendering such opinion, PRE’s Counsel shall be entitled to rely upon customary assumptions and representations reasonably satisfactory to such counsel, including representations set forth in certificates of officers of PRE and Axis.
(e) Post-Closing Directors. All required actions shall have been taken such that, immediately following the Effective Time, the PRE Board Designees shall be appointed, and entitled to serve, as Post-Closing Directors of the Amalgamated Company.
(f) No Axis Material Adverse Effect. Since the date of this Agreement there shall not have been any effect, change, event or occurrence that has had, or is reasonably likely to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect with respect to Axis.
(g) A.M. Best Rating. Each of Axis’s Insurance Subsidiaries domiciled in Bermuda will have a Financial Strength Rating of at least “A-” from A.M. Best Company, Inc.
6.3 Conditions to Obligations of Axis.
The obligations of Axis to consummate the Transactions shall be subject to the satisfaction of the following conditions unless waived by Axis on or prior to the Closing Date:
(a) Representations and Warranties. (i) Each of the representations and warranties of PRE set forth in Section 3.2(a) (Capitalization) shall be true and correct in all respects, except for de minimis inaccuracies, as though made on and as of the Closing Date (except for representations and warranties made as of a specified date, the accuracy of which will
be determined as of that specified date); (ii) the representations and warranties of PRE set forth in Section 3.2(b)-3.2(g) (Capitalization), Section 3.3 (Corporate Authorization) Section 3.5 (Enforceability), Section 3.9 (Vote Required), Section 3.13(ii)-(iii) (Absence of Certain Changes), Section 3.24 (Takeover Statutes) and Section 3.30 (Brokers and Finders), that are not qualified by “materiality” or “Material Adverse Effect” shall be true and correct in all material respects, and all of such representations that are so qualified by “materiality” or “Material Adverse Effect” shall be true and correct in all respects, in each case as though made on and as of the Closing Date (except for representations and warranties made as of a specified date, the accuracy of which shall be determined as of that specified date); (iii) the representations and warranties contained in Section 3.13(iv) shall be true and correct in all respects and (iv) the other representations and warranties of PRE set forth in this Agreement shall be true and correct in all respects, without regard to any “materiality” or “Material Adverse Effect” qualifications contained therein, as though made on and as of the Closing Date (except for representations and warranties made as of a specified date, the accuracy of which shall be determined as of that specified date), unless the failure or failures of such representations and warranties to be true and correct in all respects would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.
(b) Performance of Obligations of PRE. PRE shall have performed or complied in all material respects with all obligations and covenants required to be performed by it under this Agreement at or prior to the Closing Date.
(c) Certification. Axis shall have received a certificate signed on behalf of PRE by the Chief Executive Officer or the Chief Financial Officer of PRE, certifying that the conditions set forth in Section 6.3(a), Section 6.3(b) and Section 6.3(e) have been satisfied.
(d) Opinion of Tax Counsel. Axis shall have received a written opinion from Axis’s Counsel, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to PRE, dated as of the Closing Date, to the effect that for U.S. federal income tax purposes the Amalgamation will constitute a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. In rendering such opinion, Axis’s Counsel shall be entitled to rely upon customary assumptions and representations reasonably satisfactory to such counsel, including representations set forth in certificates of officers of PRE and Axis.
(e) Post-Closing Directors. All required actions shall have been taken such that, immediately following the Effective Time, the Axis Board Designees shall be appointed, and entitled to serve, as Post-Closing Directors of the Amalgamated Company.
(f) No PRE Material Adverse Effect. Since the date of this Agreement there shall not have been any effect, change, event or occurrence that has had, or is reasonably likely to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect with respect to PRE.
(g) A.M. Best Rating. Each of PRE’s Insurance Subsidiaries domiciled in Bermuda will have a Financial Strength Rating of at least “A-” from A.M. Best Company, Inc.
ARTICLE VII
TERMINATION AND AMENDMENT
7.1 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated and the Transactions may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time:
(a) by mutual written consent of Axis and PRE by action of their respective boards of directors;
(b) by either Axis or PRE if there shall be any Law that makes consummation of the Transactions illegal or otherwise prohibited, or if any Order enjoins, restrains or otherwise prohibits Axis or PRE from consummating the Transactions and such Order shall have become final and nonappealable provided that the right to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this Section 7.1(b) shall not be available to any party whose failure to comply in any material respect with any covenant or obligation under this Agreement has primarily caused the issuance of any such Order;
(c) by either Axis or PRE if the Transactions shall not have been consummated on or prior to one year from the date hereof (the “End Date”); provided, that, the right to terminate this Agreement under this Section 7.1(c) shall not be available to any party whose failure to comply in any material respect with any covenant or obligation under this Agreement has primarily contributed to the failure of the Transactions to occur on or before the End Date;
(d) by Axis prior to obtaining the Requisite PRE Vote: (A) (i) if the PRE Board shall effect a Change of Recommendation, or (ii) if after the date hereof an Acquisition Proposal with respect to PRE was publicly announced or disclosed (or any Person shall have publicly announced an intention (whether or not conditional) to make such an Acquisition Proposal) and the PRE Board fails to reaffirm publicly the PRE Board Recommendation within five Business Days after receipt of a written request from Axis to do so (other than in connection with a tender offer or exchange offer contemplated by Section 5.8(b)(iii)), or (iii) the PRE Board publicly announces an intention to take any of the foregoing actions; or (B) PRE has materially breached its obligations under Section 4.1(e) or Section 5.8;
(e) by PRE prior to obtaining the Requisite Axis Vote: (A) (i) if the Axis Board shall effect a Change of Recommendation, or (ii) if after the date hereof an Acquisition Proposal with respect to Axis was publicly announced or disclosed (or any Person shall have publicly announced an intention (whether or not conditional) to make such an Acquisition Proposal) and the Axis Board fails to reaffirm publicly the Axis Board Recommendation within five Business Days after receipt of a written request from PRE to do so (other than in connection with a tender offer or exchange offer contemplated by Section 5.8(b)(iii)), or (iii) the Axis Board publicly announces an intention to take any of the foregoing actions; or (B) Axis has materially breached its obligations under Section 4.1(d) or Section 5.8;
(f) by Axis or PRE if at the PRE Shareholders Meeting (including any adjournment or postponement thereof) the Requisite PRE Vote shall not have been obtained;
(g) by Axis or PRE if at the Axis Shareholders Meeting (including any adjournment or postponement thereof) the Requisite Axis Vote shall not have been obtained; or
(h) by Axis or PRE if there shall have been a breach by the other of any of its representations, warranties, covenants or agreements contained in this Agreement, which breach would result in the failure of one or more of the conditions set forth in Section 6.2(a) or 6.2(b) (in the case of a breach by Axis) or Section 6.3(a) or 6.3(b) (in the case of a breach by PRE) to be satisfied on or prior to the End Date, and such breach shall not be capable of being cured or shall not have been cured within 30 Business Days after detailed written notice thereof shall have been received by the party alleged to be in breach.
7.2 Effect of Termination.
(a) In the event of the termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1, this Agreement, except for the provisions of the second sentence of Section 4.2, this Section 7.2 and Sections 8.2 through 8.12, shall become void and have no effect, without any liability on the part of any party or its directors, officers or shareholders with respect thereto. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this Section 7.2 shall relieve any party to this Agreement of liability for fraud or any willful and intentional breach of any provision of this Agreement and, if it shall be judicially determined that termination of this Agreement was caused by a willful and intentional breach of this Agreement, then, in addition to other remedies at law or equity for a willful and intentional breach of this Agreement, the party so found to have willfully and intentionally breached this Agreement shall indemnify and hold harmless the other parties for their respective reasonable out-of-pocket costs, fees and expenses of their counsel, accountants, financial advisors and other experts and advisors as well as fees and expenses incident to negotiation, preparation and execution of this Agreement, including related severance costs and expenses. and related documentation and shareholders’ meetings and consents (collectively, “Costs”), provided, however, that, upon payment by Axis or PRE of the Termination Fee in full, such party shall no longer be required to indemnify and hold harmless the other parties for their respective Costs pursuant to this Section 7.2(a). No termination of this Agreement shall affect the obligations of the parties contained in the Confidentiality Agreement, all of which obligations shall survive termination of this Agreement in accordance with their respective terms.
(b) If this Agreement is terminated by Axis for any reason pursuant to Section 7.1(d), then PRE will, within three Business Days following any such termination, pay to Axis or its designee in cash by wire transfer in immediately available funds to an account designated by Axis a termination fee in an amount equal to $250,000,000 (the “Termination Fee”).
(c) If this Agreement is terminated for any reason by PRE pursuant to Section 7.1(e), then Axis will, within three Business Days following any such termination, pay to PRE or its designee in cash by wire transfer in immediately available funds to an account designated by PRE the Termination Fee.
(d) If either party terminates this Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1(f) because the Requisite PRE Vote has not been obtained (and, if Axis is the terminating party, the Requisite Axis Vote has not been taken yet or has already been obtained), then PRE shall, as
promptly as reasonably practicable (and in any event within three Business Days following such termination), pay to Axis, by wire transfer in immediately available funds, an amount equal to $55,000,000 (the “No Approval Fee”); provided that if: (i) an Acquisition Proposal in respect of PRE was publicly announced or disclosed (or any Person shall have publicly announced an intention to make an Acquisition Proposal in respect of PRE) prior to the PRE Shareholders’ Meeting at which the Requisite PRE Vote (including any adjournment or postponement thereof) was not obtained, and (ii) PRE, within 12 months after the date of such termination, enters into a letter of intent, agreement-in-principle, acquisition agreement or other similar agreement with respect to, or publicly announces, a Business Combination or consummates a Business Combination, then PRE will, prior to the earlier of the consummation of a Business Combination or execution of a definitive agreement with respect thereto, also pay to Axis or its designee, in cash by wire transfer in immediately available funds to an account designated by Axis, the Termination Fee less the No Approval Fee.
(e) If either party terminates this Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1(g) because the Requisite Axis Vote has not been obtained (and, if PRE is the terminating party, the Requisite PRE Vote has not been taken yet or has already been obtained), then Axis shall, as promptly as reasonably practicable (and in any event within three Business Days following such termination), pay to PRE, by wire transfer in immediately available funds, the No Approval Fee; provided that if: (i) an Acquisition Proposal in respect of Axis was publicly announced or disclosed (or any Person shall have publicly announced an intention to make an Acquisition Proposal in respect of Axis) prior to the Axis Shareholders’ Meeting at which the Requisite Axis Vote (including any adjournment or postponement thereof) was not obtained, and (ii) Axis, within 12 months after the date of such termination, enters into a letter of intent, agreement-in-principle, acquisition agreement or other similar agreement with respect to, or publicly announces, a Business Combination or consummates a Business Combination, then Axis will, prior to the earlier of the consummation of a Business Combination or execution of a definitive agreement with respect thereto, also pay to PRE or its designee, in cash by wire transfer in immediately available funds to an account designated by PRE, the Termination Fee less the No Approval Fee.
(f) If this Agreement is terminated by PRE for any reason pursuant to Section 7.1(h) or Section 7.1(c) (i) following the public announcement or disclosure of an Acquisition Proposal in respect of Axis or the intention by any Person to make such an Acquisition Proposal and (ii) within 12 months after the date of such termination pursuant to Section 7.1(h) or Section 7.1(c), Axis enters into a letter of intent, agreement-in-principle, acquisition agreement or other similar agreement with respect to, or publicly announces, a Business Combination or consummates a Business Combination, then Axis will, upon the earlier to occur of the entering into such letter of intent, agreement-in-principle, acquisition agreement or other similar agreement and the consummation of such Business Combination, pay to PRE or its designee, in cash by wire transfer in immediately available funds to an account designated by PRE, the Termination Fee.
(g) If this Agreement is terminated by Axis for any reason pursuant to Section 7.1(h) or Section 7.1(c) (i) following the public announcement or disclosure of an Acquisition Proposal in respect of PRE or the intention by any Person to make such an Acquisition Proposal and (ii) within 12 months after the date of such termination pursuant to
Section 7.1(h) or Section 7.1(c), PRE enters into a letter of intent, agreement-in-principle, acquisition agreement or other similar agreement with respect to, or publicly announces, a Business Combination or consummates a Business Combination, then PRE will, upon the earlier to occur of the entering into such letter of intent, agreement-in-principle, acquisition agreement or other similar agreement and the consummation of such Business Combination, pay to Axis or its designee, in cash by wire transfer in immediately available funds to an account designated by Axis, the Termination Fee.
(h) For the purposes of this Section 7.2, “Business Combination” means: (i) a merger, amalgamation, consolidation, share exchange, business combination, reorganization, recapitalization, dissolution, liquidation or similar transaction involving Axis, in the case of Axis, or PRE in the case of PRE, as a result of which the shareholders of Axis or the shareholders of PRE, as applicable, prior to such transaction in the aggregate cease to own more than 50% of the voting securities of the entity surviving or resulting from such transaction (or the ultimate entity thereof), (ii) any purchase of an equity interest (including by means of a tender or exchange offer) representing an amount equal to or greater than a 50% voting or economic interest in Axis or PRE, as applicable, or (iii) any purchase of assets, securities or ownership interests representing an amount equal to or greater than 50% of the consolidated assets (including stock of the respective Subsidiaries of Axis or PRE, as applicable), consolidated net revenues or earnings before interest, Taxes, depreciation and amortization of Axis and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or PRE and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, as applicable.
(i) The parties acknowledge and agree that in no event shall a party be required to pay the Termination Fee on more than one occasion. In the event the Termination Fee is paid to a party in accordance with this Section 7.2, such payment shall be the sole and exclusive remedy of such party and its Subsidiaries, shareholders and Representatives against the other party or any of its Subsidiaries, shareholders and Representatives with respect to the termination, event or breach giving rise to that payment, except in the case of fraud or any willful or intentional breach of any provision of this Agreement.
(j) Upon any termination of this Agreement in circumstances where the Termination Fee or the No Approval Fee is payable, the party liable to pay the Termination Fee or the No Approval Fee (as applicable) shall, in addition to payment of the Termination Fee or the No Approval Fee (as applicable) reimburse the other party and its Affiliates (by wire transfer of immediately available funds), no later than three Business Days after such termination, for 100% of their out-of-pocket fees, costs, obligations owed to third parties and expenses (including reasonable fees and expenses of their counsel) actually incurred by any of them in contemplation of, in connection with or in any way relating to the consideration, negotiation or implementation of this Agreement or the Transactions and other actions contemplated hereby in an amount not to exceed $35,000,000.
Axis and PRE each acknowledge that the agreements contained in this Section 7.2 are an integral part of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement and that, without these agreements, neither party would enter into this Agreement. Accordingly, if the either Axis or PRE (the “Defaulting Party”) fails promptly to pay any amount due to the other pursuant to this Section 7.2, it shall also pay any costs and expenses incurred by the other party in connection with a legal action to enforce this Agreement that results in a judgment against Defaulting Party
for such amount, together with interest on the amount of any unpaid fee, cost or expense at the rate per annum equal to the prime rate published in The Wall Street Journal on the date such payment was required to be made, from the date such fee, cost or expense was required to be paid to (but excluding) the payment date.
7.3 Amendment. This Agreement may be amended by the parties, by action taken or authorized by their respective boards of directors, at any time before or after receipt of the Requisite PRE Vote or the Requisite Axis Vote, but after any such approval, no amendment shall be made which by Law requires further approval or authorization by the shareholders of PRE or Axis without such further approval or authorization. This Agreement may not be amended except by an instrument or instruments in writing signed and delivered by an authorized representative of each of the parties.
7.4 Extension; Waiver. At any time prior to the Effective Time, Axis (with respect to PRE) and PRE (with respect to Axis) by action taken or authorized by their respective boards of directors, may, to the extent legally allowed (i) extend the time for the performance of any of the obligations or other acts of such other party, (ii) waive any inaccuracies in the representations and warranties contained in this Agreement or in any certificate delivered pursuant to this Agreement and (iii) waive compliance with any of the agreements or conditions contained in this Agreement or in any document delivered pursuant to this Agreement. Any agreement by a party to any such extension or waiver shall be valid only if set forth in a written instrument signed on behalf of such party. No delay by any party in exercising any right hereunder shall operate as a waiver of such right, nor shall any waiver by any party of any such right nor any single or partial exercise of any such right preclude any further exercise of such right or the exercise of any other such right.
ARTICLE VIII
MISCELLANEOUS
8.1 Survival of Representations and Warranties. None of the representations, warranties, covenants and agreements in this Agreement or in any instrument delivered pursuant to this Agreement, including any rights arising out of any breach of such representations, warranties, covenants and agreements, will survive the Effective Time, except for those covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement and such other instruments that by their terms apply or are to be performed in whole or in part after the Effective Time and this Article VIII.
8.2 Notices. All notices, requests, claims, demands and other communications under this Agreement shall be in writing (including electronic mail transmission, so long as a receipt of such email is requested and received) and shall be given and shall be deemed given upon receipt if delivered personally, telecopied (delivery of which is confirmed) or dispatched by a nationally recognized overnight courier service to the parties (delivery of which is confirmed) or by registered or certified mail (postage paid, return receipt requested) to the respective parties at the following addresses (or at such other address for a party as shall be specified by like notice):
| (a) | if to Axis: |
| | |
| | Axis Capital Holdings Limited 92 Pitts Bay Road Pembroke, HM 08 Bermuda |
| | Attention: | Richard T. Gieryn, Jr.General Counsel |
| | Facsimile: | (441) 496-2600 |
| | Email: | richard.gieryn@axiscapital.com |
| | | |
| | with a copy to (which shall not constitute notice): |
| | Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP 425 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10017 |
| | Attention: | Gary I. Horowitz Patrick J. Naughton |
| | Facsimile: | (212) 455-2502 |
| | Email: | ghorowitz@stblaw.compnaughton@stblaw.com |
| (b) | |
| | |
| | PartnerRe Ltd. Wellesley House South, 90 Pitts Bay Road Pembroke HM 08, Bermuda |
| | Attention: | Marc Wetherhill / Chief Legal Counsel |
| | Facsimile: | +1 441 292 3060 |
| | Email: | marc.wetherhill@partnerre.com |
| | | |
| | with a copy to (which shall not constitute notice): |
| | Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP 450 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10017 |
| | Attention: | |
| | Facsimile: | |
| | Email: | phillip.mills@davispolk.com |
8.3 Interpretation.
(a) When a reference is made in this Agreement to an Article, Section, Annex or Exhibit, such reference shall be to an Article, Section, Annex or Exhibit of this Agreement unless otherwise indicated to the contrary. The descriptive Article and Section headings and the table of contents contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and are not intended to be part of and shall not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. All terms defined in this Agreement shall have the defined meanings when used in
any certificate or other document made or delivered pursuant to this Agreement unless otherwise defined in such certificate or other document. The definitions contained in this Agreement are applicable to the singular as well as the plural forms of such terms and to the masculine as well as to the feminine and neuter genders of such term. Where a word or phrase is defined in this Agreement, each of its other grammatical forms shall have a corresponding meaning. Any statute defined or referred to in this Agreement or in any agreement or instrument that is referred to in this Agreement means such statute as from time to time amended, modified or supplemented, including by succession of comparable successor statutes. The parties have participated jointly in the drafting and negotiation of this Agreement. If an ambiguity or question of intent or interpretation arises, this Agreement shall be construed as if it is drafted jointly by all the parties, and no presumption or burden of proof shall arise favoring or disfavoring any party by virtue of authorship of any of the provisions of this Agreement. Whenever the words “include,” “includes,” or “including” are used in this Agreement, they shall be deemed to be followed by the words “without limitation.” The words “hereof,” “herein,” “herewith” and “hereby” and words of similar import shall, unless otherwise stated, be construed to refer to this Agreement as a whole and not to any particular provision of this Agreement. The word “or” shall be construed non-exclusively. The phrase “ordinary course of business” shall be construed to be followed by the phrase “consistent with past practice” regardless of whether such phrase is expressed. The phrases “the date of this Agreement,” “the date hereof” and words of similar import, shall be deemed to refer to the date set forth on the cover page of this Agreement. Whenever the last day for the exercise of any right or the discharge of any duty under this Agreement falls on a day other than a Business Day, the party having such right or duty shall have until the next Business Day to exercise such right or discharge such duty. Unless otherwise indicated, the word “day” shall be interpreted as a calendar day. No summary of this Agreement prepared by or on behalf of any party shall affect the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. References to “dollars” or “$” are to United States dollars. Each section or subsection of a Disclosure Letter qualifies the correspondingly numbered representation, warranty or covenant of the Agreement; provided that information disclosed in one section or subsection of a Disclosure Letter shall be deemed to be included in each other section or subsection of such Disclosure Letter in which the relevance of such information would be readily apparent on the face thereof. Representations and warranties in Article III that are made in reference to a party’s Disclosure Letter or “in the case of” or “with respect to” a certain party and its Subsidiaries or Affiliates are being made only by that party. Unless the context shall require otherwise, any Contracts, documents, instruments or Laws defined or referred to in this Agreement shall be deemed to mean or refer to such Contracts, documents, instruments or Laws as from time to time may be amended, modified or supplemented, including (i) in the case of Contracts, documents or instruments, by waiver or consent and (ii) in the case of Laws, by succession of comparable successor statutes; provided that, with respect to Contracts, such rule of construction shall only be effective with respect to amendments, modification or supplements effected prior to the date hereof. All references in this Agreement to any particular Law shall be deemed to refer also to any rules and regulations promulgated under that Law.
8.4 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, which together shall constitute one and the same Agreement. The parties may execute more than one copy of this Agreement, each of which shall constitute an original. Signatures to this Agreement transmitted by facsimile transmission, by electronic mail in “portable document format” (“pdf”) form, or by any other electronic means intended to preserve the original graphic and pictorial
appearance of a document, will have the same effect as physical delivery of the paper document bearing the original signature.
8.5 Entire Agreement. This Agreement (including the Exhibits and Annexes hereto), the Axis Disclosure Letter, the PRE Disclosure Letter, the Amalgamation Agreement and the Confidentiality Agreement constitute the entire agreement among the parties and supersede all prior agreements and understandings or representations by or among the parties whether written and oral with respect to the subject matter hereof and thereof. The Confidentiality Agreement shall continue in full force and effect until the Closing and shall survive any termination of this Agreement. No representation, warranty, inducement, promise, understanding or condition not set forth in this Agreement has been made or relied upon by any of the parties to this Agreement. Each party hereby disclaims any other representation, warranty or inducement, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of any other information made by, or made available by, itself or any of its Representatives, with respect to, or in connection with, the negotiation, execution or delivery of this Agreement, the Amalgamation Agreement or the Transactions.
8.6 Severability. Any term or provision of this Agreement that is invalid or unenforceable in any jurisdiction shall, as to that jurisdiction, be ineffective to the extent of such invalidity or unenforceability without rendering invalid or unenforceable the remaining terms and provisions of this Agreement or affecting the validity or enforceability of any of the terms or provisions of this Agreement in any other jurisdiction. If any provision of this Agreement is so broad as to be unenforceable, the provision shall be interpreted to be only so broad as would be enforceable.
8.7 Third-Party Beneficiaries. Except for the Indemnified Parties intended to benefit from the provisions of Section 5.3, nothing in this Agreement, express or implied, is intended or shall be construed to create any third-party beneficiaries or confer upon any Person other than the parties any rights, benefits or remedies of any nature whatsoever under or by reason of this Agreement.
8.8 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed with regard to, in all respects, including as to validity, interpretation and effect, the Laws of the State of New York with respect to contracts performed within that state, provided that any provisions of this Agreement which relate to the exercise of a director or officer’s fiduciary duties, statutory duties, obligations and/or statutory provisions, or which arise under, the laws of Bermuda (including but not limited to amalgamations under the Companies Act) shall be governed by and in accordance with the laws of Bermuda.
8.9 Consent to Jurisdiction; Venue.
(a) Each party irrevocably and unconditionally consents, agrees and submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of Bermuda (and appropriate appellate courts therefrom) (the “Chosen Courts”), for the purposes of any litigation, action, suit or other proceeding with respect to the subject matter hereof. Each party agrees to commence any litigation, action, suit or proceeding relating hereto only in the Supreme Court of Bermuda, or if such litigation, action, suit or other proceeding may not be brought in such court for reasons of
subject matter jurisdiction, in the other appellate courts therefrom or other courts of Bermuda. Each party irrevocably and unconditionally waives any objection to the laying of venue of any litigation, action, suit or proceeding with respect to the subject matter hereof in the Chosen Courts, and hereby further irrevocably and unconditionally waives and agrees not to plead or claim in any such court that any such action, suit or proceeding brought in any such court has been brought in an inconvenient forum. Each party further irrevocably and unconditionally consents to and grants any such court jurisdiction over the Person of such parties and, to the extent legally effective, over the subject matter of any such dispute and agrees that mailing of process or other documents in connection with any such action or proceeding in the manner provided in Section 8.2 hereof or in such other manner as may be permitted by applicable Law, shall be valid and sufficient service thereof. The parties agree that a final judgment in any such litigation, action, suit or proceeding shall be conclusive and may be enforced in other jurisdictions by suit on the judgment or in any other manner provided by applicable Law.
8.10 Specific Performance. The parties recognize and agree that if for any reason any of the provisions of this Agreement are not performed in accordance with their specific terms or are otherwise breached or violated, immediate and irreparable harm or injury would be caused for which money damages would not be an adequate remedy under applicable Law. Accordingly, each party agrees that, in addition to all other remedies to which it may be entitled, each of the parties is entitled to a decree of specific performance and shall further be entitled to an injunction restraining any violation or threatened violation of any of the provisions of this Agreement without the necessity of posting a bond or other form of security. In the event that any Legal Action should be brought in equity to enforce any of the provisions of this Agreement, no party will allege, and each party hereby waives the defense, that there is an adequate remedy under applicable Law.
8.11 Assignment. Neither this Agreement nor any of the rights, interests or obligations arising under this Agreement shall be directly or indirectly assigned, delegated sublicensed or transferred by any of the parties (whether by operation of law or otherwise), in whole or in part, to any other Person (including any bankruptcy trustee) without the prior written consent of the other parties. Subject to the preceding sentence, this Agreement shall be binding upon, inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the parties and their respective successors and assigns.
8.12 Expenses. Subject to the provisions of Section 7.2, all costs and expenses (including those payable to Representatives) incurred in connection with this Agreement and the Transactions and shall be paid by the party incurring such expenses, except that those expenses incurred in connection with filing, printing and mailing the Registration Statement and the Joint Proxy Statement (including filing fees related thereto) and those expenses incurred in connection with obtaining the Transaction Approvals will be shared equally by Axis and PRE.
8.13 Defined Terms. For purposes of this Agreement, each of the following terms shall have the meaning set forth below.
“Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement” means any confidentiality agreement entered into by PRE or Axis from and after the date of this Agreement that contains customary
confidentiality, “standstill” and other terms that are not materially less favorable in the aggregate to such party than those contained in the Confidentiality Agreement.
“Acquisition Agreement” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 5.8(a).
“Acquisition Proposal” means any proposal or offer made by any Person (other than (A) PRE or its Subsidiaries in the case of a proposal for Axis or (B) Axis and its Subsidiaries in the case of a proposal for PRE) with respect to: (i) a merger, amalgamation, consolidation, share exchange, business combination, reorganization, recapitalization, dissolution, liquidation or similar transaction involving Axis or PRE, as applicable, (ii) any purchase of an equity interest (including by means of a tender or exchange offer) representing an amount equal to or greater than a 15% voting or economic interest in Axis or PRE, as applicable, or (iii) any purchase of assets, securities or ownership interests representing an amount equal to or greater than 15% of the consolidated assets (including stock of the respective Subsidiaries of Axis or PRE, as applicable), consolidated net revenues or earnings before interest, Taxes, depreciation and amortization of Axis and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or PRE and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, as applicable.
“Affiliate” means, with respect to any Person, any other Person that directly or indirectly controls, is controlled by or is under common control with, such first Person. For the purposes of this definition, “control” (including, with correlative meanings, the terms “controlling,” “controlled by” and “under common control with”), as applied to any Person, means the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of that Person, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract or otherwise.
“Agreement” shall have the meaning set forth in the Introduction.
“Amalgamated Company” shall have the meaning set forth in the Recitals.
“Amalgamated Company Board” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 1.5(a).
“Amalgamated Company Bye-Laws” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 1.4.
“Amalgamated Company Common Shares” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.1(b).
“Amalgamated Company Memorandum of Association” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 1.4.
“Amalgamated Company Share Issuance” shall mean the Amalgamated Company Common Shares issued by virtue of the Amalgamation.
“Amalgamation” shall have the meaning set forth in the Recitals.
“Amalgamation Agreement” shall have the meaning set forth in the Recitals.
“Amalgamation Application” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 1.1.
“Applicable SAP” means, with respect to any Insurance Subsidiary of PRE or Axis, as the case may be, the applicable statutory accounting principles (or local equivalents in the applicable jurisdiction) prescribed or permitted by the Insurance Regulator of the jurisdiction of domicile of such PRE Insurance Subsidiary or Axis Insurance Subsidiary under applicable Insurance Law.
“Appraised Fair Value” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.1(e)
“Associate” shall mean each officer or other employee, or individual who is an independent contractor, consultant or director of PRE or Axis, as applicable.
“Assumed Reinsurance Contract” shall mean means a reinsurance or retrocession treaty or agreement, slip, binder, cover note or other similar arrangement or Contract under which any PRE Insurance Subsidiary or Axis Insurance Subsidiary is the reinsurer or retrocessionaire.
“Axis” shall have the meaning set forth in the Introduction.
“Axis Board” shall have the meaning set forth in the Recitals.
“Axis Board Designees” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 1.5(a).
“Axis Board Recommendation” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.4(b).
“Axis Bye-Law Amendment” shall mean amending the Axis Bye-Laws by inserting the words “(including for the purposes of Section 106(4A) of the Act)” after the first mention of the word “business” in bye-law 38 (Quorum for general meetings) and after the word “meeting” in subparagraph (1) of bye-law 43 (Voting at meetings).
“Axis Certificate” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.2(a).
“Axis Common Share” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.1(a).
“Axis Consideration” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.1(c).
“Axis’s Counsel” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 4.4.
“Axis Credit Agreement” shall mean the Credit Agreement, dated as of March 26, 2013, by and among Axis, certain subsidiaries of Axis, the lenders party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as administrative agent.
“Axis Credit Facilities” shall mean the Axis Credit Agreement and the letter of credit facility established pursuant to the Master Reimbursement Agreement, dated as of May 14, 2010, as amended, by and among Axis Specialty Limited, certain subsidiaries of Axis and Citibank Europe PLC.
“Axis Disclosure Letter” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.
“Axis Dissenting Holder” shall mean a holder of Axis Common Shares or Axis Preferred Shares who did not vote in favor of the Amalgamation and who complies with all of the
provisions of the Companies Act concerning the right of holders of Axis Common Shares or Axis Preferred Shares to require appraisal of their Axis Common Shares or Axis Preferred Shares pursuant to Bermuda Law.
“Axis Dissenting Shares” shall mean Axis Common Shares or Axis Preferred Shares held by a Dissenting Axis Shareholder.
“Axis Exchange Ratio” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.1(c).
“Axis Option” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.3(d).
“Axis Other Share-Based Award” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.3(f).
“Axis Preferred Shares” shall mean each of Axis’s 6.875% Series C preferred shares and 5.50% Series D preferred shares.
“Axis Restricted Share Award” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.2(c).
“Axis SEC Reports” shall mean SEC Reports of Axis.
“Axis Share Plans” shall mean the Axis Capital Holdings Limited 2013 Executive Long-Term Equity Compensation Program, the Axis Capital Holdings Limited 2007 Long-Term Equity Compensation Plan, the Axis Capital Holdings Limited 2003 Long-Term Equity Compensation Plan and the Axis Capital Holdings Limited 2003 Directors Long-Term Equity Compensation Plan, in each case, as amended from time to time.
“Axis Share Register” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.2(a).
“Axis Shareholders” shall mean the holders of Axis Common Shares.
“Axis Shareholders Meeting” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 4.1(d).
“Benefit Plans” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.18(a).
“Business Combination” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 7.2(h).
“Bye-Laws” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.1(c).
“Business Day” shall mean any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or other day on which banking institutions in New York or Bermuda are obligated by Law or executive order to be closed.
“Ceded Reinsurance Contract” means a reinsurance or retrocession treaty or agreement, slip, binder, cover note or other similar arrangement or Contract under which any Insurance Subsidiary of PRE or Axis, as applicable, is a cedent or retrocedent.
“Certificate of Amalgamation” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 1.1.
“Change of Recommendation” shall have meaning set forth in Section 5.8(b).
“Chosen Courts” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 8.9(a).
“Closing” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 1.2.
“Closing Date” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 1.2.
“Code” shall have the meaning set forth in the Recitals.
“Companies Act” shall have the meaning set forth in the Recitals.
“Common Share Trust” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.2(g).
“Confidentiality Agreement” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 4.2.
“Consideration” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.1(d).
“Contracts” means any contracts, agreements, licenses, notes, bonds, mortgages, indentures, commitments, leases or other instruments or obligations.
“Continuing Employee” shall mean any employee of Axis or PRE or any of their respective Subsidiaries who continues employment with the Surviving Company or any of its Affiliates.
“Costs” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 7.2(a).
“Data Protection Laws” means any data protection Laws and regulations in the United States of America, the European Union, or elsewhere in the world.
“Defaulting Party” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 7.2(j).
“Disclosure Letter” shall have the meaning set forth in Article III.
“End Date” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 7.1(b).
“Effective Time” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 1.1.
“Environmental Law” means any Applicable Law that has as its principal purpose the protection of the environment.
“Equity Award” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.2(a).
“ERISA” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.18(a).
“ESPP” shall mean PRE’s 2009 Employee Share Purchase Plan.
“Event” shall mean any event, change or effect.
“Excess Shares” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.2(g).
“Exchange Act” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.8(b).
“Exchange Agent” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.2(a).
“Exchange Fund” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.2(b).
“Excluded Shares” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.1(a).
“Financing” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 5.7.
“GAAP” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.11(a)(ii).
“Grant Date” shall mean shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.2(c).
“Governmental Entity” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.8.
“Hazardous Substance” means any pollutant, contaminant, or chemical or any toxic, radioactive, ignitable, corrosive, reactive or otherwise hazardous substance, waste or material, or any substance, waste or material having any constituent elements displaying any of the foregoing characteristics, including any substance, waste or material regulated under any Environmental Law.
“HSR Act” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.8(e).
“Indemnified Parties” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 5.3(a).
“Information Security Breach” means any unauthorized acquisition of or access to, or unauthorized disclosure of, any Personal Data of employees or customers of a party or any of its Subsidiaries.
“Insurance Laws” means all Laws (including all applicable domestic, foreign (including Bermuda), national, provincial, federal, state and local statutes and regulations) regulating the business and products of insurance or concerning the regulation of insurance companies (including acquisition of control), all applicable requirements relating to the sale, issuance, marketing, advertising, and administration of insurance products and all applicable Orders of Insurance Regulators.
“Insurance Regulator” means all Governmental Entities regulating the business of insurance and reinsurance under applicable Insurance Law.
“Insurance Subsidiaries” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.16(a).
“Intellectual Property” means: (i) patents, patent applications and statutory invention registrations, (ii) trademarks, service marks, trade dress, logos, trade names, corporate names, domain names and other source identifiers, and registrations and applications for registration thereof, (iii) copyrights (including copyrights in computer software and Internet websites) and registrations and applications for registration thereof, (iv) trade secrets under applicable Laws, including confidential and proprietary information and know-how, (v) moral rights, rights of
publicity and rights of privacy, and (vi) any other intellectual property rights, or similar proprietary or industrial rights, under the Laws of any jurisdiction.
“Interested Party Transaction” shall mean have the meaning set forth in Section 3.25(a).
“Investment Assets” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.15(a).
“Investment Guidelines” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.15(a).
“IT Systems” shall mean, with respect to a party and its Subsidiaries, all information technology systems, owned or otherwise used by such party or its Subsidiaries in their respective businesses, including servers, computer hardware, networks, software, databases, telecommunications systems, interfaces, and their related systems.
“Joint Proxy Statement” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.28.
“Knowledge” shall mean the actual knowledge, without due inquiry, of the officers of Axis set forth in Section 8.13(a) of the Axis Disclosure Letter or the officers of PRE set forth in Section 8.13(a) of the PRE Disclosure Letter, as the case may be.
“Law” shall mean any law, statute, ordinance, arbitration award, or any rule, regulation, judgment, order, writ, injunction, decree, agency requirement or published interpretation of any Governmental Entity.
“Leased Real Property” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.22(b).
“Legal Actions” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.14.
“Liabilities” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.12(a).
“Liens” means any liens, pledges, security interests, claims, options, rights of first offer or refusal, charges or other encumbrances.
“Material Adverse Effect” means, with respect to any party, any event, circumstance, change or effect that is materially adverse (a) to the business, operations, assets or financial condition of such party or its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or (b) on the ability of such party to perform its obligations hereunder without material delay or impairment; provided, that, in this case of paragraph (a) in no event shall any of the following, alone or in combination, be deemed to constitute, nor shall any events, circumstances, changes or effects resulting from any of the following be taken into account in determining whether there has been, or will be, a Material Adverse Effect:
(i) (A) a change in general political, legislative, economic or financial market conditions or securities, credit, financial or other capital markets or currency conditions; (B) the commencement, continuation or escalation of actions or war, armed hostilities, sabotage, acts of terrorism, or other man-made disaster; (C) changes, circumstances or events generally affecting the property and casualty insurance and reinsurance industry in the geographic areas and product markets in which such party or its Subsidiaries conduct business; (D) any change in any
applicable Laws; (E) any change in GAAP or Applicable SAP following the date of this Agreement; or (F) liabilities under policies of insurance written or Assumed Reinsurance Contracts from any terrorist act, earthquake, hurricane, tsunami, tornado, windstorm, epidemic or other natural or man-made disaster; except in the case of the foregoing clauses (A) through (E) to the extent those events, circumstances, changes or effects have a disproportionate effect on such party and its Subsidiaries compared to other companies of similar size operating in the industries and geographic regions in which such party and its Subsidiaries operate; and
(ii) (A) the public announcement of the execution of this Agreement or the consummation of the Transactions, including the impact thereof on relationships, contractual or otherwise, with customers, cedents, reinsureds, retrocessionaires, reinsurance brokers or intermediaries, suppliers, vendors, lenders, venture partners or employees; (B) any decline, in and of itself, in the market price, or change in trading volume, of the PRE Common Shares or Axis Common Shares, as applicable; (C) the failure, in and of itself, to meet any revenue, earnings or other projections, forecasts or predictions for any period ending following the date of this Agreement; (D) any action taken at the written request of the other party; or (E) any change or announcement of a potential change in such Person’s or any of its Subsidiaries’ credit or claims paying rating or the rating of any of its or its Subsidiaries’ businesses or securities, provided, that the exceptions described in the foregoing clauses (B) and (C) shall not prevent or otherwise affect a determination that any underlying changes, state of facts, circumstances, events or effects have resulted in, or contributed to, a Material Adverse Effect.
“Material Contract” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.17(a).
“Memorandum of Association” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.1(c).
“No Approval Fee” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 7.2(d).
“Non-U.S. Benefit Plans” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.18(a).
“NYSE” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.8(c).
“Order” means any order, judgment, injunction, award, decree or writ handed down, adopted or imposed by any Governmental Entity.
“Organizational Documents” means, with respect to any entity, the memorandum of association or the certificate or articles of incorporation and bye-laws or by-laws of such entity, or any similar organizational documents of such entity.
“Owned Intellectual Property” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.21(a)(iii).
“Owned Real Property” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.22(a)
“Party Assets” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.6(b).
“Party Contracts” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.6(c).
“parties” shall have the meaning set forth in the Introduction.
“Permits” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.23(a).
“Person” shall mean an individual, a company, a corporation, a limited liability company, a partnership, an association, a trust or any other entity or organization, including a government or political subdivision or any agency or instrumentality thereof.
“Personal Data” has the same meaning as the term “personal data,” “personal information,” or the equivalent under applicable Data Protection Laws.
“Permitted Encumbrance” means, with respect to a party: (i) statutory liens securing payments not yet due or that are being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings and for which adequate reserves have been established in accordance with GAAP and Liens for Taxes not yet due or that are being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings and for which adequate reserves have been established in accordance with GAAP in the most recent financial statements included in the SEC Reports of such party, (ii) such imperfections or irregularities of title, claims, liens, charges, security interests or encumbrances as do not affect the use of the properties or assets subject thereto or affected thereby or otherwise impair business operations at such properties, (iii) restrictions on transfer imposed by applicable Laws, (iv) assets pledged or transferred to secure reinsurance or retrocession obligations, (v) ordinary course securities lending and short-sale transactions entered into in accordance with the Investment Guidelines, (vi) investment securities held in the name of a nominee, custodian or other record owner, (vii) statutory deposits required under any applicable Insurance Laws or as may be required under other applicable Laws or Material Contracts, Reinsurance Contracts or Benefit Plans,(viii) non-exclusive licenses of Intellectual Property granted in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice, (ix) zoning, building codes and other land use laws regulating the use or occupancy of any Owned Real Property or Leased Real Property or the activities conducted thereon and which are not violated by the current use or occupancy of such Owned Real Property or Leased Real Property, (x) encumbrances and restrictions on any Owned Real Property or Leased Real Property (including easement, covenants, conditions, rights of way and similar restrictions) that, individually or in the aggregate, do not materially impair, and would not reasonably be expected to materially impair, the present or intended use, occupancy and/or operation of such Owned Real Property or Leased Real Property, or (xi) any failure to hold good title which would not reasonably be expected, individually or in the aggregate, to materially detract from the value of any of the property, rights or assets of the business of such party or any of the Subsidiaries of such party or materially interfere with the use thereof as currently used by such party or, as the case may be, any of the Subsidiaries of such party.
“Policies” shall mean all policies, policy forms, binders, slips, treaties, certificates, insurance or reinsurance contracts or participation agreements and other agreements of insurance or reinsurance, whether individual or group (including all applications, supplements, endorsements, riders and ancillary agreements in connection therewith) and all amendments, applications and certificates pertaining thereto issued by a party or any of its Insurance Subsidiaries.
“Post-Closing Directors” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 1.5(a).
“PRE” shall have the meaning set forth in the Introduction.
“PRE Board” shall have the meaning set forth in the Recitals.
“PRE Board Designees” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 1.5(a).
“PRE Board Recommendation” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.4(a).
“PRE Certificate” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.2(a).
“PRE Common Share” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.1(b).
“PRE Consideration” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.1(b).
“PRE’s Counsel” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 4.4.
PRE Credit Facilities” shall mean those letter of credit facilities set forth on Schedule 8.13 of the PRE Disclosure Letter.
“PRE Disclosure Letter” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.
“PRE Dissenting Holder” shall mean a holder of PRE Common Shares or PRE Preferred Shares who did not vote in favor of the Amalgamation and who complies with all of the provisions of the Companies Act concerning the right of holders of PRE Common Shares or PRE Preferred Shares to require appraisal of their PRE Common Shares or PRE Preferred Shares pursuant to Bermuda Law.
“PRE Dissenting Shares” shall mean PRE Common Shares or PRE Preferred Shares held by a PRE Dissenting Holder.
“PRE Exchange Ratio” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.1(b).
“PRE Option” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.3(a).
“PRE Preferred Shares” shall mean each of PRE’s 6.50% Series D Cumulative Preferred Shares, $1.00 par value, 7.25% Series E Cumulative Preferred Shares, $1.00 par value and 5.875% Series F Non-Cumulative Preferred Shares, $1.00 par value.
“PRE SAR” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.3(b).
“PRE SEC Reports” shall mean SEC Reports of PRE.
“PRE Share Plans” shall mean the PartnerRe Ltd. Amended and Restated Employee Equity Plan, the PartnerRe Ltd. Amended and Restated Non-Employee Directors Share Plan and the PartnerRe Ltd. Amended Employee Incentive Plan, in each case, as amended from time to time.
“PRE Share Register” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.2(a).
“PRE Shareholders” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.1(b).
“PRE Shareholders Meeting” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 4.1(e).
“PRE Other Share-Based Award” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.3(c).
“Prospectus” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.28.
“Purchase Plans” shall have the meaning in Section 5.5.
“Real Property Leases” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.22(b).
“Registrar” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 1.1.
“Registration Statement” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.28.
“Regulatory Material Adverse Effect” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 4.3(d).
“Reinsurance Contracts” means the Assumed Reinsurance Contracts and the Ceded Reinsurance Contracts.
“Representatives” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 5.8(a).
“Required Permits” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.23(a).
“Requisite Axis Vote” means the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at a duly convened meeting of the shareholders of Axis at which a quorum is present in accordance with Axis’s Bye-Laws to approve and adopt this Agreement, the Amalgamation Agreement and the Amalgamation; provided, that if the Axis Bye-Law Amendment is not approved, then “Requisite Axis Vote” shall mean the affirmative vote of three-fourths of the votes cast at a duly convened meeting of the shareholders of Axis at which a quorum is present to approve and adopt this Agreement, the Amalgamation Agreement and the Amalgamation in accordance with section 106 (4A) of the Companies Act.
“Requisite PRE Vote” means the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at a duly convened meeting of the shareholders of PRE, at which a quorum is present in accordance with PRE’s Bye-Laws, to approve and adopt this Agreement, the Amalgamation Agreement, and the Amalgamation.
“SEC” shall have the meaning set forth in in Section 3.8(b).
“SEC Reports” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.10(a).
“Securities” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.2(b).
“Securities Act” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.8(b).
“Shareholders Meeting” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.28.
“SSPP” shall mean PRE’s Swiss Share Purchase Plan.
“Statutory Statements” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.16(c).
“Subsidiary” shall mean, as to any Person, any corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited liability company, trust, estate or other Person of which (or in which), directly or indirectly, more than 50% of: (i) the issued and outstanding capital stock having ordinary voting power to elect a majority of the board of directors of such corporation (irrespective of whether at the time capital stock of any other class or classes of such corporation shall or might have voting power upon the occurrence of any contingency), (ii) the interest in the capital or profits of such partnership, joint venture or limited liability company or other Person or (iii) the beneficial interest in such trust or estate, is at the time owned by such first Person, or by such first Person and one or more of its other Subsidiaries or by one or more of such Person’s other Subsidiaries.
“Superior Proposal” means a bona fide written Acquisition Proposal (except that references in the definition of the “Acquisition Proposal” to 15% shall be replaced by 50%) made after the date of this Agreement by any Person (other than (A) PRE or its Subsidiaries in the case of a proposal for Axis or (B) Axis and its Subsidiaries in the case of a proposal for PRE on terms that the Axis Board or the PRE Board, as applicable, determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisors, and considering such factors as the Axis Board or the PRE Board, as the case may be, considers to be appropriate (including all the terms and conditions of the Acquisition Proposal, including any break-up fees, conditions to consummation, the timing and likelihood of consummation of such proposal), are more favorable to Axis and the Axis Shareholders or PRE and the PRE Shareholders, as applicable, than the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, taking into account any change to the transaction proposed by PRE or Axis, as applicable.
“Superior Proposal Notice” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 5.8(d).
“Takeover Statutes” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.24(a).
“Taxes” shall mean any and all federal, state, local, foreign or other taxes of any kind (together with any and all interest, penalties, additions to tax and additional amounts imposed with respect thereto) imposed by any Governmental Entity, including taxes or other similar charges on or with respect to income, franchises, windfall or other profits, gross receipts, property, capital, sales, use, transfer, inventory, license, capital stock, payroll, employment, unemployment, social security, workers’ compensation, severance, stamp, occupation, premium or net worth, and taxes or other similar charges in the nature of excise, withholding, ad valorem, value added, estimated taxes, or custom duties.
“Tax Return” means any report, return, document, declaration or other information or filing required to be filed with respect to Taxes (whether or not a payment is required to be made with respect to such filing), including, without limitation, information returns, declarations of estimated Taxes, amended returns or claims for refunds (and any attachments thereto).
“Termination Fee” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 7.2(b).
“Transactions” means the transactions contemplated by this Agreement and the Amalgamation Agreement, including the Amalgamation.
“Transaction Approvals” shall mean have the meaning set forth in Section 3.8(f).
“Treasury Regulations” shall have the meaning set forth in the Recitals.
“Uncertificated Axis Common Shares” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.2(a).
“Uncertificated PRE Common Shares” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.2(a).
“U.S. Benefit Plans” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.18(b).
[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank; Signature Page Follows]
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.
| AXIS CAPITAL HOLDINGS LIMITED | |
| | | |
| By: | | |
| | Name: | |
| | Title: | |
| | | |