Nortek 10-K 2013 FY Annual report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10 - K

(Mark One)

[X]    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year-ended December 31, 2013

OR

[ ]    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __________ to __________

Commission file number: 001-34697

Nortek, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	05-0314991
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
50 Kennedy Plaza Providence, Rhode Island	02903-2360
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including Area Code:	(401) 751-1600

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [_] No [X]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes [_] No [X]

Indicate by check mark whether registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [_]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).     Yes [X]    No [_]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer [_] Accelerated filer [X] Non-accelerated filer [_] (Do not check if smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company [_]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [_] No [X]

As of the last business day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter (June 29, 2013), the aggregate market value of the registrant's common stock held by non-affiliates was approximately $586.2 million. The registrant's common stock trades on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “NTK”.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes [X] No [_]

The number of shares of the registrant's common stock par value $0.01 per share outstanding as of March 7, 2014 was 15,436,960.

Documents incorporated by reference:

Portions of the registrant's definitive Proxy Statement for its 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, 2013 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

	TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM 1.	BUSINESS	3
ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS	11
ITEM 2.	PROPERTIES	24
ITEM 3.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	26
ITEM 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES	26
	EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT	26
ITEM 5.	MARKET PRICE OF AND DIVIDENDS ON THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS	27
ITEM 6.	SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA	29
ITEM 7.	MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	30
ITEM 7A.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	71
ITEM 8.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA	71
ITEM 9.	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE	71
ITEM 9A.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	71
ITEM 9B.	OTHER INFORMATION	74
ITEM 10.	DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS	74
ITEM 11.	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	74
ITEM 12.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT	75
ITEM 13.	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE	75
ITEM 14.	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES	75
ITEM 15.	EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES	76

INFORMATION REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This annual report on Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements” about Nortek, Inc. ("Nortek") and its subsidiaries (the "Company"). When used in this discussion and throughout this document, words such as “intend,” “plan,” “estimate,” “believe,” “will,” “could,” “may,” “seek,” “anticipate,” and “expect” or other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, which are provided "safe harbor" protection under the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on the Company's current plans and expectations and involve risks and uncertainties, over which the Company has no control, that could cause actual future activities and results of operations to be materially different from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause actual future activities and operating results to differ include the availability and cost of certain raw materials (including, among others, steel, copper, packaging materials, plastics, resins, glass, wood and aluminum) and purchased components; freight costs; global economic conditions and the level of domestic and foreign construction and remodeling activity affecting residential and commercial markets; interest rates; employment levels; inflation; foreign currency fluctuations; foreign economic and political conditions; consumer spending levels; exposure to foreign economies; the rate of sales growth; prices; competition; maintaining good relationship with customers and suppliers; weather fluctuations; acquisition and integration risks; the success of our operational improvement initiatives; labor disruptions; increased costs associated with regulatory compliance; changes in tax law; our ability to service our indebtedness; and product and warranty liability claims. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. The Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise (except as required by applicable securities laws). All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to the Company or persons acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. Readers are also urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by the Company in this annual report on Form 10-K, including without limitation statements in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the risk factors described in Item 1A, and any further disclosures the Company makes on related subjects in its Form 10-Q and Form 8-K reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

WEBSITE ACCESS TO COMPANY REPORTS

Copies of our filings under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act") (including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K) are available on our website, www.nortekinc.com, free of charge, as soon as reasonably practicable after such materials are filed with, or furnished to, the SEC.

2

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

December 31, 2013

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS.

General

Nortek was founded in 1967 and is headquartered in Providence, Rhode Island. The Company is incorporated in the State of Delaware. In this annual report, “Nortek,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to Nortek, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries unless the context requires otherwise.

Operating within five reporting segments, we are a global, diversified company whose many market-leading brands deliver broad capabilities and a wide array of innovative, technology-driven products and solutions for lifestyle improvement at home and at work. Our reporting segments are as follows:

• the Residential Ventilation (“RESV”) segment,

• the Technology Solutions (“TECH”) segment,

• the Display Mount Solutions ("DMS") segment,

• the Residential Heating and Cooling (“RHC”) segment, and

• the Custom & Engineered Solutions (“CES”) segment.

Through these segments, we manufacture and sell, primarily in the United States, Canada, and Europe, with additional manufacturing in China and Mexico, a wide variety of products for the remodeling and replacement markets, the residential and commercial new construction markets, the manufactured housing market, and the personal and enterprise computer markets.

Our performance is significantly impacted by the levels of residential replacement and remodeling activity, as well as the levels of residential and non-residential new construction. New residential and non-residential construction activity and, to a lesser extent, residential remodeling and replacement activity are affected by seasonality and cyclical factors such as interest rates, credit availability, inflation, consumer spending, employment levels and other macroeconomic factors, over which we have no control.

Operational Improvement Initiatives

In 2012, Nortek began implementing a plan to transform our structure from that of a largely decentralized holding company to an actively managed operating company. This plan included a set of operational improvement initiatives aimed at improving Nortek’s cost structure and optimizing its operations in order to realize efficiencies and deliver superior value to its customers. Examples of these initiatives, which are underway, include:

• Procurement and sourcing,

• Manufacturing footprint and distribution optimization,

• Leveraging resources and implementing common business practices, and

• Working capital management.

We are pursuing these various initiatives in order to improve Nortek’s performance and enhance its competitive position. These initiatives are expected to result in a significantly improved cost structure, align us better in the markets we serve, and create a foundation for growth and sustainable competitive advantage well into the future. For additional detail related to these initiatives, refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Operational Improvement Initiatives,” in Item 7 of Part II to this report.

In addition to the above initiatives, which primarily relate to existing operations and organic growth, Nortek has implemented a strategy related to the process by which we evaluate and pursue strategic acquisitions. We plan to pursue acquisitions that are highly synergistic, have a strong strategic rationale, and meet or exceed internal financial hurdles; this focused approach to growth is expected to result in improved value creation for Nortek’s stockholders.

3

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

December 31, 2013

The Company’s Business Segments

Segment	Primary Products	Major Brands(1)	2013 Net Sales(2)(3)
Residential Ventilation	Range hoods, exhaust fans, indoor air quality products, central vacuum systems	Broan®, NuTone®, Venmar®, Best®, Zephyr®	$	600.5
Technology Solutions	Residential security and home automation systems, audio/video products, power conditioners, video signal management solutions	Linear®, 2GIG, Niles®, Elan®, SpeakerCraft®, Panamax®, TVOne®	526.9
Display Mount Solutions	Wall and desk mounts, carts, arms, workstations, stands, related accessories	Ergotron®, OmniMount®	274.5
Residential Heating & Cooling	Split-system and packaged air conditioners and heat pumps, air handlers, furnaces	Frigidaire®, Gibson®, Westinghouse®, Maytag®, Broan®, NuTone®, Intertherm®	415.2
Custom & Engineered Solutions	Custom-designed and engineered heating, ventilation and air conditioning ("HVAC") products, including air handlers and large rooftop cooling and heating systems	Mammoth®, Temtrol®, Ventrol®, Huntair®, Governair®, Cleanpak™, Fanwall®, Vapac®, Edenaire®	470.8
		Total	$	2,287.9

(1)Certain brands in the RHC Segment are used under license. See the detailed segment description below for details.

(2)Amounts in millions

(3) Additional financial information on our reporting segments, as well as foreign and domestic operations, is set forth in Note 9, “Segment Information and Concentration of Credit Risk”, to the consolidated financial statements, Item 8 of Part II to this report.

Residential Ventilation Segment

Our RESV segment primarily manufactures and distributes room and whole house ventilation products for the professional remodeling and replacement markets, residential new construction market, and do-it-yourself (“DIY”) market. Based on internal research and analysis, we estimate that approximately 69% to 73% of the segment's 2013 net sales were sold for remodeling and replacement applications versus residential new construction. We sell the products in our RESV segment to distributors and dealers of electrical and lighting products, kitchen and bath dealers, retail home centers and private label customers.

The principal products of the segment, which are sold under the Broan®, NuTone®, Venmar®, Best® and Zephyr® brand names, among others, are kitchen range hoods, exhaust fans (such as bath fans and fan, heater and light combination units), and indoor air quality products (such as air exchangers and heat or energy recovery ventilators). Based on internal research and industry knowledge, we believe that we are one of the world's largest suppliers of residential range hoods and exhaust fans and are the largest supplier of these products in North America, in each case, based on revenues. We also believe, based on internal research and industry knowledge, that we are one of the leading suppliers in North America of indoor air quality products, based on revenues.

A key component of our operating strategy for this segment is the introduction of new products and innovations, which capitalize on the strong brand names and the extensive distribution system of the segment's businesses. We believe that new product introductions and the breadth and depth of our product lines help us to maintain and improve our market position for our principal products. We compete with suppliers of competitive products primarily on the basis of quality, distribution, delivery and price. This segment's primary products compete with products supplied by many domestic and international suppliers in various markets. In the range hood market, this segment's primary global competitors are Elica Group, Faber S.p.A. and Cata Electrodomesticas S.L. This segment competes with Panasonic Corporation, among others, in the residential exhaust fan market.

4

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

December 31, 2013

Technology Solutions Segment

Our TECH segment manufactures and distributes a broad array of products designed to provide convenience and security for residential and certain commercial applications. The principal product categories in this segment include security and access control equipment and systems, residential audio/video and home automation solutions, and professional video signal management solutions.

The segment's security and access control products include residential and certain commercial intrusion protection systems and components focused on wireless technology such as control panels, keypads and telephone entry systems, radio transmitters, window and door contacts, and lighting control devices as well as garage and gate operators. These products are sold under the Linear®, 2GIG, SecureWireless, GTO/PRO®, and Mighty Mule® brands, as well as others including private labels for certain customers. Sales of security and access control products accounted for approximately 66%, 53% and 54% of total TECH segment net sales in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

The segment's residential audio/video and home automation solutions include whole-house audio/video products, and home automation systems as well as certain accessories often used with these systems such as power conditioners and surge protectors. Whole-house audio/video products include, among other products, multi-room/multi-source controllers and amplifiers, architectural speakers, and control devices such as keypads, remote controls and volume controls. The segment's home automation systems include software and hardware that facilitate the control of third-party residential subsystems such as home theater, whole-house audio, climate control, lighting, security and irrigation. These products are sold under the Niles®, Elan®, SpeakerCraft®, Xantech®, Panamax® and Furman® brand names, among others.

The segment's professional video signal management solutions allow conversion of video signals into various formats as well as the extension and transmission of video signals to multiple display screens. These products are often used in non-residential applications such as retail outlets, airports, casinos, houses of worship, live events, and command and control centers as well as certain residential applications and are sold under the Gefen®, Magenta™ and TVOne® brand names.

We sell the products in our TECH segment to distributors, professional installers, electronics retailers and original equipment manufacturers. Sales in this segment are primarily driven by replacement applications, new installations in existing properties and to a lesser extent new construction activity. In addition, a portion of the sales in this segment is driven by sales to customers in the non-residential market. Based on internal analysis, we estimate that in 2013, approximately 87% to 91% of this segment's net sales were attributable to end-use applications not related to residential new construction.

The segment offers a broad array of products under widely-recognized brand names with various features and price points, which we believe allows it to expand its distribution in the professional installation and retail markets. The segment's primary products compete with products supplied by many domestic and international suppliers in various markets. The segment competes with Honeywell Security (owned by Honeywell International, Inc.), Interlogix (owned by United Technologies Corporation), and DSC (owned by Tyco International Ltd.), among others. The segment also competes with Crestron Electronics, Inc. as well as two portfolio companies of Duchossois Industries, Inc., Chamberlain Corporation, and AMX LLC. The segment competes with suppliers of competitive products primarily on the basis of quality, distribution, delivery and price.

5

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

December 31, 2013

Display Mount Solutions Segment

Our DMS segment manufactures and distributes a broad array of innovative products designed with ergonomic features including wall mounts, carts, arms, desk mounts, workstations, and stands that attachto or support a variety of display devices such as notebook computers, computer monitors, and flat panel displays. Many of theseproducts are offered with features that allow users to comfortably sit or stand while working at a computer. The segment also sellscharging carts designed for notebook computers and tablet devices.

These products are sold under the Ergotron® and OmniMount® brand names, as well as certain original equipment manufacturer brand names in the personal computer industry. We sell the products in our DMS segment to distributors, retailers and original equipment manufacturers. Through these channels, the segment serves the healthcare, education, office, hospitality and home markets. Sales in this segment are primarily driven by personal computer and information technology ("IT") spending and consumer purchases of flat-panel televisions as well as attachment of our products to existing computer and television displays.

The segment offers innovative products under its strong brands, and at competitive prices, which we believe allows it to expand its distribution and its relationships with original equipment manufacturer customers. Another key component of our strategy in this segment is the continuous introduction of new products that capitalize on our well-known brands and strong customer relationships.

The segment's primary products compete with products supplied by many domestic and international suppliers in various markets. The segment competes with Milestone AV Technologies (sells under the Chief and Sanus brand names), Peerless Industries, Inc., and Rubbermaid Medical Solutions, a division of Newell Rubbermaid, Inc., among others. The segment competes with suppliers of competitive products primarily on the basis of quality, innovation, price, and delivery.

Residential Heating and Cooling Segment

Our RHC segment principally manufactures and sells split-system and packaged air conditioners and heat pumps, air handlers, furnaces and related equipment, accessories, and parts for the residential replacement and new construction markets, as well as for certain commercial markets. During 2013, we estimate that between approximately 78% and 82% of this segment's net sales were attributable to applications other than the residential new site-built construction market. For site-built homes and certain commercial structures, the segment markets its products under the licensed brand names Frigidaire®, Tappan®, Philco®, Kelvinator®, Gibson®, Westinghouse® and Maytag®. The segment also supplies products to certain of its customers under the Broan®, NuTone®, Mammoth® and certain private label brand names.

The segment sells residential HVAC products for use in site-built homes primarily through independently owned distributors who sell to HVAC contractors. In 2013, the segment opened three of its own distribution centers in certain markets where it was geographically underrepresented. Building on this distribution strategy, the segment plans to expand its efforts in this area in 2014 and beyond. In the site-built residential HVAC market, the segment competes with, among others, Carrier Corporation (a subsidiary of United Technologies Corporation), Rheem Manufacturing Company, Lennox Industries, Inc., Trane, Inc. (a subsidiary of IngersollRand Company), York by Johnson Controls, and Goodman Global, Inc. (a subsidiary of Daikin Corporation). The segment also sells residential HVAC products outside of North America, primarily in Latin America and the Middle East. These sales outside of North America consist of not only the segment's manufactured products, but also products manufactured to specification by outside sources. The products are sold under the Westinghouse® licensed brand name, the segment's own Miller® brand name, as well as other private label brand names.

Within the residential market, we are one of the largest suppliers of HVAC products for manufactured homes in the United States and Canada. In the manufactured housing market, the segment markets its products under the Intertherm® and Miller® brand names. The segment sells its manufactured housing products to builders of manufactured housing and, through distributors, to manufactured housing retailers and owners. The majority of our sales to manufactured housing builders are for furnaces, and in the aftermarket channel of distribution, we sell both new and replacement air conditioning units and heat pumps, as well as replacement furnaces. We believe that we have one major competitor in the manufactured housing furnace market, York by Johnson Controls, which markets its products primarily under the “Coleman” name. The segment competes with most major industry manufacturers in the manufactured housing air conditioning market.

The segment competes in both the site-built and manufactured housing markets on the basis of breadth and quality of its product line, distribution, product availability and price.

6

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

December 31, 2013

Custom & Engineered Solutions Segment

Our CES segment manufactures and sells custom-designed and engineered HVAC products and systems, primarily in North America, for non-residential applications that include healthcare and educational facilities, commercial buildings, manufacturing facilities, clean rooms, data centers, and government buildings. These systems are designed primarily to operate on building rooftops (including large self-contained walk-in units), or on individual floors within a building, and to have cooling capacities ranging from 40 tons to 600 tons. The principal products sold by this segment are air handlers and large custom rooftop cooling and heating products. The segment markets its commercial HVAC products under the Governair®, Mammoth®, Temtrol®, Venmar CES™, Ventrol®, Webco™, Huntair®, Cleanpak™ and Fanwall® brand names. Our subsidiary, Eaton-Williams Group Limited, manufactures and markets custom and standard air conditioning and humidification equipment throughout Western Europe under the Vapac®, Cubit®, Qualitair®, Edenaire®, Colman™ and Moducel™ brand names. For 2013, we estimate that between approximately 49% and 53% of our air conditioning and heating product commercial sales came from replacement and retrofit activity, which typically is less cyclical than new construction activity and generally commands higher margins.

The segment specializes in custom-designed and engineered HVAC products and systems that meet the specific requirements of its customers and optimize total cost of ownership in ways that are often not possible with standard commercial equipment. Unlike standard commercial HVAC equipment, the segment's equipment can be designed to match a customer's exact space, capacity and performance requirements. The segment's commercial HVAC products are marketed through independent manufacturers' representatives, as well as other sales, marketing and engineering professionals. The independent representatives are typically HVAC engineers, a factor which is significant in marketing the segment's products because of the design-intensive nature of the market segment in which the segment competes. The segment sells its custom designed and engineered HVAC products and systems to contractors, owners and developers of commercial office buildings, manufacturing and educationalfacilities, hospitals, retail stores, clean rooms, data centers, and government buildings. The segment seeks to maintain, as well as establish and develop, strong relationships nationwide with design engineers, owners and developers, and the persons who are most likely to value the benefits and long-term cost efficiencies of its equipment.

We believe that we are among the largest suppliers of custom and engineered HVAC products in the United States. The segment's four largest competitors in this market are Carrier Corporation (a subsidiary of United Technologies Corporation), York by Johnson Controls, McQuay International (a subsidiary of Daikin Corporation) and Trane, Inc. (a subsidiary of Ingersoll-Rand Company). The segment competes primarily on the basis of engineering support, quality, design and construction flexibility, and total installed system cost. We believe that our ability to produce equipment that meets the performance characteristics required by the particular product application provides us with an advantage in the marketplace.

Manufacturing Facilities

The number of manufacturing facilities by segment at December 31, 2013 was as follows:

Segment	Number of Manufacturing Facilities
Residential Ventilation	11
Technology Solutions	3
Display Mount Solutions	3
Residential Heating and Cooling (1)	4
Custom & Engineered Solutions (1)	11

(1) See also "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Operational Improvement Initiatives", in Item 7 of Part II, to this report.

7

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

December 31, 2013

Backlog

Backlog expected to be filled within the next twelve months was approximately $344.4 million as of December 31, 2013 as compared to approximately $315.8 million as of December 31, 2012. The increase in backlog at December 31, 2013 as compared to December 31, 2012 was primarily due to increased backlog within the CES Segment primarily related to one large customer.

Backlog is not regarded as a significant factor for operations where orders are generally for prompt delivery. While backlog stated for all periods is believed to be firm, as all orders are supported by either a purchase order or a letter of intent, the possibility of cancellations makes it difficult to assess the firmness of backlog with certainty, and therefore there can be no assurance that our backlog will result in actual revenues.

Raw Materials and Components

We purchase raw materials and most components used in our various manufacturing processes. The principal raw materials and components we purchase are steel, copper, aluminum, electronics, motors, plastics, compressors, various chemicals and paints, and packaging.

The materials, molds and dies, subassemblies and components purchased from other manufacturers, and other materials and supplies used in our manufacturing processes have generally been available from a variety of sources. From time to time the cost and availability of raw materials is affected by the raw material demands of other industries, among other factors. Whenever practical, we establish multiple sources for the purchase of raw materials and components to achieve competitive pricing, ensure flexibility, and protect against supply disruption. When possible, we employ a company-wide procurement strategy designed to reduce the purchase price of raw materials and purchased components.

As discussed in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Operational Improvement Initiatives", Item 7 of Part II to this report, in connection with our operational improvement initiatives, we believe that we have a significant opportunity to reduce our manufacturing material cost, as well as our indirect non-manufacturing costs, by optimizing our procurement sources and processes. In 2013, we began the process of consolidating supplier sources and negotiating terms and pricing in a uniform and centralized manner.  As a result of this initiative, we have begun to experience more competitive costs and services from our suppliers, and we expect this favorable trend will continue in 2014 and beyond.

We are subject to significant market risk with respect to the pricing of the principal raw materials used to manufacture our products. If prices of these raw materials were to increase dramatically, we may not be able to pass such increases on to our customers and, as a result, gross margins could decline significantly.

Research and Development

Our research and development activities are principally for new product development and represented approximately 2.9%, 2.7% and 2.7% of consolidated net sales for 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. We believe that investment in research and development activities is important to our ability to compete effectively in the markets that we serve. As discussed in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Operational Improvement Initiatives", Item 7 of Part II to this report, in connection with our operational improvement initiatives we have or plan to make significant increased levels of investments in staffing, research and development projects and specialized consulting resources. Consequently, expenditures for research and development activities in 2013 were a higher percentage of consolidated net sales than previously, and we expect this trend to continue in 2014 and beyond.

8

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

December 31, 2013

Trademarks and Patents

We own or license numerous trademarks that we use in the marketing of our products. Certain of the trademarks we own are particularly important in the marketing of our products. We also hold numerous design and process patents, but no single patent is material to the overall conduct of our business. It is our policy to obtain and protect patents whenever such action would be beneficial to us.

Environmental and Regulatory Matters

We are subject to numerous federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations relating to protection of the environment, including those that impose limitations on the discharge of pollutants into the environment (land, air and water), establish standards for the use, treatment, storage and disposal of solid and hazardous materials and wastes, and govern the cleanup of contaminated sites. We believe that we are in substantial compliance with the material laws and regulations applicable to us. We are involved in current, and may become involved in future, remedial actions under federal and state environmental laws and regulations which impose liability on companies to clean up, or contribute to the cost of cleaning up, sites currently or formerly owned or operated by such companies or sites at which their hazardous wastes or materials were disposed of or released. Such claims may relate to properties or business lines acquired by us after a release has occurred. In other instances, we may be partially liable under law or contract to other parties that have acquired businesses or assets from us for past practices relating to hazardous materials or wastes. Expenditures for2013, 2012 and 2011to evaluate and remediate such sites were not material to our business, either individually or collectively. While we are able to reasonably estimate certain of our contingent losses, we are unable to estimate with certainty our range of reasonably possible losses in connection with identified or yet to be identified remedial actions due, among other reasons, to: (i) uncertainties surrounding the nature and application of current or future environmental regulations, (ii) our lack of information about additional sites where we may be identified as a potentially responsible party ("PRP"), (iii) the level of clean-up that may be required at specific sites and choices concerning the technologies to be applied in corrective actions and (iv) the time periods over which remediation may occur. Furthermore, since liability for site remediation may be joint and several, each PRP is potentially wholly liable for other PRPs that become insolvent or bankrupt. Thus, the solvency of other PRPs could directly affect our ultimate aggregate clean-up costs. In certain circumstances, our liability for clean-up costs may be covered in whole or in part by insurance or indemnification obligations of third parties.

Certain of our products must be designed and manufactured to meet various regulatory standards. We must continue to modify regulated products to meet applicable standards as such standards develop and become more stringent over time.

9

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

December 31, 2013

Employees

The number of full-time employees, and those covered by collective bargaining agreements, by segment at December 31, 2013 was as follows:

Segment	Number of Employees	Collective Bargaining Agreement
Residential Ventilation (1) (2)	2,100	155
Technology Solutions	2,400	0
Display Mount Solutions	1,400	0
Residential Heating and Cooling	1,100	0
Custom & Engineered Solutions (3)	2,500	149
Corporate	100	0
	9,600	304

(1) Due to continued restructuring at our Italian range hood subsidiary, 68 employees have been excluded from the above table as the union contract associated with this subsidiary has not been renewed. See Note 5, "Exit and Disposal Activities", to the consolidated financial statements, Item 8 of Part II, included elsewhere in this report.

(2) Collective bargaining agreement expired on December 31, 2013 and is in the process of being renewed.

(3) Collective bargaining agreement expires in 2015.

We believe that our relationships with employees are satisfactory. A work stoppage at one of our facilities could cause us to lose sales and incur increased costs and could adversely affect our ability to meet customers’ needs. As agreements expire and until negotiations are completed, we do not know whether we will be able to negotiate collective bargaining agreements on the same or more favorable terms as the current agreements, or at all, and do so without production interruptions, including labor stoppages.

Working Capital and Seasonality

The carrying of inventories to support customers and to permit prompt delivery of finished goods requires substantial working capital. Substantial working capital is also required to carry receivables. The demand for our products is seasonal, particularly in the Northeast and Midwest regions of the United States and in Canada where inclement weather during the winter months usually reduces the level of building and remodeling activity in both the home improvement and new construction markets. Certain of the residential product businesses in the RHC segment have in the past been more seasonal in nature than our other businesses’ product categories. As a result, the demand for working capital of our subsidiaries is greater from late in the first quarter until early in the fourth quarter. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources,” Item 7 of Part II to this report.

As discussed in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Operational Improvement Initiatives", Item 7 of Part II to this report, in 2012, we began operational improvement initiatives which we expect will result in significant improvements in efficiencies and reductions in operating costs and expenses, both in our manufacturing processes and in our administrative functions, which will better align us with the markets we serve and will improve our overall competitiveness. In 2013, we incurred additional costs to implement these initiatives, which included engaging additional outside resources, the cost of relocating manufacturing and distribution locations in addition to the facilities discussed above, retrofitting existing or building new facilities, reducing our work force, rationalizing or refreshing product lines, and other costs.  The cost of developing and implementing these initiatives impacted the availability of working capital in 2013 and may continue to impact the availability of working capital, and may require that we utilize other available sources or identify additional sources of liquidity during the period that these initiatives are in process.

10

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

December 31, 2013

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

This section describes the material risks associated with our business. Investors should carefully consider each of the risks described below, as well as the other information in this report and in our filings with the SEC. The occurrence of any of the following risks could individually or in the aggregate have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operation or cash flow.

Risks Related to Our Business:

Our business is affected by global economic conditions.

Our results of operations are directly influenced by the conditions in the global economy. As a result of the global economic recession, U.S. and foreign economies have experienced significant declines in employment, household wealth, property values, consumer spending and lending. Businesses, including Nortek and many of its customers, have faced and may continue to face weakened demand for products and services, difficulty obtaining access to financing, increased funding costs and barriers to expanding operations. Our results of operations have been negatively impacted by the global economic recession and we can provide no assurance that our results of operations will improve.

Our business is dependent upon the levels of remodeling and replacement activity and new construction activity, which may be cyclical or seasonal, and have been negatively impacted by the economic downturn and the instability of the credit markets.

Critical factors affecting our future performance, including our level of sales, profitability and cash flows are the levels of residential and non-residential remodeling, replacement and construction activity. The level of new residential and non-residential construction activity and, to a lesser extent, the level of residential remodeling and replacement activity are affected by seasonality and cyclical factors such as interest rates, inflation, consumer spending, employment levels and other macroeconomic factors, over which we have no control. Any decline in economic activity as a result of these or other factors typically results in a decline in new construction and, to a lesser extent, residential remodeling and replacement purchases, which would result in a decrease in our sales, profitability and cash flows. Instability in the credit and financial markets, troubles in the mortgage market, the level of unemployment and the decline in home values could have a negative impact on residential new construction activity, consumer disposable income and spending on home remodeling and repair expenditures. These challenging market conditions are expected to continue for the foreseeable future and may further deteriorate. These factors could have an adverse effect on our operating results.

The demand for our products is seasonal, particularly in the Northeast and Midwest regions of the United States where inclement weather during the winter months usually reduces the level of building and remodeling activity in both the home improvement and new construction markets. Our lower sales levels usually occur during the first and fourth quarters. Since a high percentage of our manufacturing overhead and operating expenses are relatively fixed throughout the year, operating income and net earnings tend to be lower in quarters with lower sales levels. In addition, the demand for cash to fund the working capital needs of our subsidiaries is greater from late in the first quarter until early in the fourth quarter.

See “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, Item 7 of Part II to this report for further information on industry factors and our 2014 outlook.

11

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

December 31, 2013

Fluctuations in the cost or availability of raw materials and components and other related costs could have an adverse effect on our business.

We are dependent upon raw materials and purchased components, including, among others, steel, copper, aluminum, electronics, motors, plastics, compressors, various chemicals and paints, and packaging that we purchase from third parties. As a result, our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition may be adversely affected by increases in costs of raw materials or components, or by limited availability of these items. We do not typically enter into long-term supply contracts for raw materials and components. In addition, we generally do not hedge against our supply requirements. Accordingly, we may not be able to obtain raw materials and components from our current or alternative suppliers at reasonable prices in the future, or may not be able to obtain these items on the scale and within the time frames we require. Further, if our suppliers are unable to meet our supply requirements, we could experience supply interruptions and/or cost increases. If we are unable to find alternate suppliers or pass along these additional costs to our customers, these interruptions and/or cost increases could adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.

Sources of raw materials or component parts for certain of our operations may be dependent upon limited or sole sources of supply which may impact our ability to manufacture finished product. While we continually review alternative sources of supply, there can be no assurance that we will not face disruptions in sources of supply which could adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows and financial position.

Continued strategic sourcing initiatives and other improvements in manufacturing efficiency, as well as sales price increases, help to mitigate fluctuations in these costs. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to offset any or all material or other cost increases in any future periods.

New regulations related to conflict minerals could require us to incur significant additional expenses.

Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, the SEC promulgated new rules for public companies to ascertain and disclose the use of "conflict minerals" (i.e., cassiterite, columbite-tantalite, wolframite, and gold) which are mined from the Democratic Republic of Congo and adjoining countries in their products. The new rules require disclosure of conflict minerals that are necessary to the functionality or production of products manufactured or contracted to be manufactured by public companies. The new rule requires companies to perform due diligence and disclose through the issuance of a report whether or not their products contain certain "conflict minerals". The new requirements have required us to conduct due diligence efforts and incur associated costs for the 2013 calendar year. Initial disclosure, if any, will be required beginning in May 2014. The new rule could affect sourcing at competitive prices and availability in sufficient quantities of certain minerals used in the manufacture of our products. The number of suppliers who provide conflict-free minerals may be limited, which could have an adverse effect on our ability to source these products in the future. In addition, costs attributable to compliance with the disclosure requirements of the SEC's new rules, such as costs related to determining the source of certain minerals used in our products, will be incurred and could be material. The costs of compliance, including those related to supply chain research, unexpected consequences to our reputation, the limited number of suppliers, and possible changes in the sourcing of these materials, could adversely affect our results from operations and cash flows.

Weather fluctuations may negatively impact our business.

Weather fluctuations may adversely affect our operating results and our ability to maintain sales volume. In our RHC segment, operations may be adversely affected by unseasonably warm weather in the months of November to February and unseasonably cool weather in the months of May to August, which has the effect of diminishing customer demand for heating and air conditioning products. In all of our segments, adverse weather conditions at any time of the year may negatively affect overall levels of new construction and remodeling and replacement activity, which in turn may lead to a decrease in sales. Many of our operating expenses are fixed and cannot be reduced during periods of decreased demand for our products. Accordingly, our results of operations and cash flows will be negatively impacted in quarters with lower sales due to weather fluctuations.

12

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

December 31, 2013

If we fail to identify suitable acquisition candidates or successfully integrate the businesses we have acquired or will acquire in the future, our business could be negatively impacted.

Historically, we have engaged in a significant number of acquisitions, and those acquisitions have contributed significantly to our growth in sales and operating results. However, we cannot provide assurance that we will continue to locate and secure acquisition candidates on terms and conditions that are acceptable to us. If we are unable to identify attractive acquisition candidates, our growth could be impaired. Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including:

• the difficulty and expense that we incur in connection with the acquisition, including those acquisitions that we pursue but do not ultimately consummate;

• the difficulty and expense that we incur in the subsequent integration of the operations of the acquired company into our operations;

• adverse accounting consequences of conforming the acquired company’s accounting policies to our accounting policies;

• the difficulties and expense of developing, implementing and monitoring systems of internal controls at acquired companies, including disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting;

• the difficulty in operating acquired businesses;

• the diversion of management’s attention from our other business concerns;

• the potential loss of customers or key employees of acquired companies;

• the impact on our financial condition due to the timing of the acquisition or the failure to meet operating expectations for the acquired business; and

• the assumption of unknown liabilities of the acquired company.

We cannot assure you that any acquisition we have made or may make in the future will be successfully integrated into our on-going operations or that we will achieve any expected cost savings from any acquisition. If the operations of an acquired business do not meet expectations, our profitability and cash flows may be impaired and we may be required to restructure the acquired business or write-off the value of some or all of the assets of the acquired business.

See Note 2, "Acquisitions and Other Investments", to the consolidated financial statements, Item 8 of Part II, included elsewhere in this report.

The operational improvement initiatives may not generate the benefits expected.

In 2012, we began to develop and implement a comprehensive operational improvement program which includes a number of transformational operational improvement initiatives intended to produce significant improvements in efficiencies and reductions in operating costs and expenses, both in our manufacturing processes and in our administrative functions.  The initiatives will result in significant investments and capital expenditures through 2015. Restructurings, facility shutdowns and integration of operations involve numerous risks in their implementation including unforeseen costs, business disruption and management distraction, among others, and may be more costly than expected. As a result, there can be no assurance that the expected costs to be incurred in connection with these initiatives, or the economic benefits expected to be achieved, will occur as contemplated.

See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Operational Improvement Initiatives", Item 7 of Part II to this report for a description of these operational improvement initiatives and the estimated costs associated therewith.

13

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

December 31, 2013

We continue to evaluate potential restructurings, business shutdowns and integrations focused on improving future cash flows of the business.

We continue to evaluate potential restructurings, business shutdowns and integrations focused on improving future cash flows of the business. These restructurings, business shutdowns and integrations involve numerous risks in their implementation including unforeseen costs, business disruption, management distraction, and potential asset impairment, among others, and may be unsuccessful. In addition, restructurings of international operations may be more costly due to differing labor laws, business practices and governmental restrictions, processes and requirements.

See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Operational Improvement Initiatives", Item 7 of Part II to this report, and Note 5, "Exit and Disposal Activities", to the consolidated financial statements, Item 8 of Part II, included elsewhere in this report.

Because we compete against competitors with substantially greater resources, we face external competitive risks that may negatively impact our business.

Our RESV and TECH segments compete with many domestic and international suppliers in various markets. We compete with suppliers of competitive products primarily on the basis of quality, distribution, delivery and price. Some of our competitors in these markets have greater financial and marketing resources than that of our RESV and TECH segments.

Our DMS segment competes with many domestic and international suppliers in various markets. We compete with suppliers of competitive products primarily on the basis of quality, innovation, price and delivery. Some of our competitors in these markets have greater financial and marketing resources than that of our DMS segment.

Our RHC segment competes in both the site-built and manufactured housing markets on the basis of breadth and quality of its product line, distribution, product availability and price. Most of our residential HVAC competitors have greater financial and marketing resources and the products of certain of our competitors may enjoy greater brand awareness than our residential HVAC products.

Our CES segment competes primarily on the basis of engineering support, quality, design and construction flexibility, and total installed system cost. Most of our competitors in the commercial HVAC market have greater financial and marketing resources and enjoy greater brand awareness than we enjoy.

Competitive factors could require us to reduce prices or increase spending on product development, marketing and sales, either of which could adversely affect our operating results.

14

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

December 31, 2013

Because we have substantial operations outside the United States, we are subject to the economic and political conditions of the United States and foreign nations.

We have manufacturing facilities in several countries outside of the United States. In 2013, we sold products in over 100 countries other than the United States. Foreign net sales, which are attributed based upon the location of our subsidiary responsible for the sale, were approximately 17% and 19% of consolidated net sales for 2013 and 2012, respectively. Our foreign operations are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including the following:

• foreign governments may impose limitations on our ability to repatriate funds;

• foreign governments may impose withholding or other taxes on remittances and other payments to us, or the amount of any such taxes may increase;

• an outbreak or escalation of any insurrection, armed conflict or act of terrorism, or other forms of political, social or economic instability, may occur;

• natural disasters may occur, and local governments may have difficulties in responding to these events;

• the United States and foreign governments currently regulate import and export of our products and those of our suppliers and may impose additional limitations on imports or exports of our products or the products of our suppliers;

• foreign governments may nationalize foreign assets or engage in other forms of governmental protectionism;

• foreign governments may impose or increase investment barriers, customs or tariffs, or other restrictions affecting our business;

• development, implementation and monitoring of systems of internal controls of our international operations, including disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting, may be difficult and expensive; and

• labor cost inflation and changes in labor practices.

The occurrence of any of these conditions could disrupt our business in particular countries or regions of the world, or prevent us from conducting business in particular countries or regions, which could reduce sales and adversely affect profitability. In addition, we rely on dividends and other payments or distributions from our subsidiaries, including our foreign subsidiaries, to meet our debt obligations. If foreign governments impose limitations on our ability to repatriate funds or impose or increase taxes on remittances or other payments to us, the amount of dividends and other distributions we receive from our foreign subsidiaries could be reduced, which could reduce the amount of cash available to us to meet our debt obligations.

Our foreign operations are subject to anti-corruption laws.

The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the UK Bribery Act and similar worldwide anti-corruption laws generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to government officials and others for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Our internal policies mandate compliance with these anti-corruption laws. We operate in parts of the world that have experienced governmental corruption to some degree, and in certain circumstances, strict compliance with anti-corruption laws may conflict with local customs and practices. Despite our training and compliance programs, there can be no assurance that our internal control policies and procedures will protect us from reckless or criminal acts committed by those of our employees or agents who violate our policies. Our continued expansion outside the U.S. (including in developing countries) in connection with our growth strategy could increase the risk of such violations in the future. Violations of these laws, or allegations of such violations, could disrupt our business and result in a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

An ongoing European debt crisis could have a material adverse effect on our European operations.

The European debt crisis and related European financial restructuring efforts have contributed to instability in the global credit markets and may cause the value of the Euro to further deteriorate. If global economic and market conditions, or economic conditions in Europe, the United States or other key markets become uncertain or deteriorate, the value of the Euro could decline and the credit market may weaken. The general financial instability in the stressed European countries could have a contagion effect on the region and contribute to the general instability and uncertainty in the European Union. If this were to occur, it could adversely affect our European customers and suppliers and in turn may have a materially adverse effect on our European business and results of operations.

15

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

December 31, 2013

Economic instability could continue to adversely affect the company.

Financial markets and the economies in the United States and internationally may continue to experience disruption and volatility as they have in recent years and conditions could worsen. As a result, the economic environment may, among other things:

• create downward pressure on the pricing of our products;

• affect the collection of accounts receivable in countries such as Greece, Italy, Spain, Portugal and certain other countries in Europe;

• increase the sales cycle for certain of our products;

• slow the adoption of new technology;

• adversely affect our customers, causing them to reduce spending and/or decrease utilization of our products;

• adversely affect our suppliers, which could disrupt our ability to produce our products; and

• limit our access to capital on terms acceptable to us.

These conditions may continue in the future. Any of these conditions could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and/or liquidity.

Fluctuations in currency exchange rates could adversely affect our revenues, profitability and cash flows.

Our foreign operations expose us to fluctuations in currency exchange rates and currency devaluations. We report our financial results in U.S. dollars, but a portion of our sales and expenses are denominated in Euros, Canadian dollars, Chinese Renminbi and other foreign currencies. As a result, if the value of the U.S. dollar increases relative to the value of the Euro, Canadian dollar, Chinese Renminbi and other currencies, our levels of revenue and profitability will decline since the translation of a certain number of other currencies into U.S. dollars for financial reporting purposes will represent fewer U.S. dollars. Conversely, if the value of the U.S. dollar decreases relative to the value of the Euro, Canadian dollar, Chinese Renminbi and other currencies, our levels of revenue and profitability will increase since the translation of a certain number of other currencies into U.S. dollars for financial reporting purposes will represent additional U.S. dollars.

In certain instances, we enter into transactions that are denominated in a currency other than the U.S. dollar. At the date the transaction is recognized, each asset, liability, revenue, expense, gain or loss arising from the transaction is measured and recorded in U.S. dollars using the exchange rate in effect at that date. At each balance sheet date, recorded monetary balances denominated in a currency other than the U.S. dollar are adjusted to the U.S. dollar using the current exchange rate with gains or losses recorded in currency translation adjustment and other, net. In addition, in the case of sales to customers in certain locations, our sales are denominated in U.S. dollars, Euros or Canadian dollars but all or a substantial portion of our associated costs are denominated in a different currency. As a result, changes in the relative values of U.S. dollars, Euros, Canadian dollars and Chinese Renminbi and any such different currency will affect our profitability and cash flows.

Varying international business practices may adversely impact our business and reputation.

We currently purchase raw materials, components and finished products from various foreign suppliers. To the extent that any such foreign supplier utilizes labor or other practices that vary from those commonly accepted in the United States, our business and reputation could be adversely affected by any resulting litigation, negative publicity, political pressure, or otherwise.

16

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

December 31, 2013

A decline in our relations with key distributors and dealers, loss of major customers or failures or delays in collecting payments from major customers may negatively impact our business.

Our operations depend upon our ability to maintain relations with our independent distributors and dealers and we do not typically enter into long-term contracts with them. If our key distributors or dealers are unwilling to continue selling our products, or if any of them merge with or are purchased by a competitor, we could experience a decline in sales. If we are unable to replace such distributors or dealers or otherwise replace the resulting loss of sales, our business, results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected. For 2013, approximately 52% of our consolidated net sales were made through our independent distributors and dealers, and our largest distributor or dealer accounted for approximately 4% of consolidated net sales for 2013.

In addition, the loss of one or more of our other major customers, or a substantial decrease in such customers' purchases from us, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows. Because we do not generally have binding long-term purchasing agreements with our customers, there can be no assurance that our existing customers will continue to purchase products from us. Our largest customer (other than a distributor or dealer) accounted for approximately 3% and 4% of consolidated net sales for 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Labor disruptions or cost increases could adversely affect our business.

A work stoppage at one of our facilities could cause us to lose sales, incur increased costs and adversely affect our ability to meet customers’ needs. A plant shutdown or a substantial modification to employment terms (including the collective bargaining agreements affecting our unionized employees) could result in material gains or losses or the recognition of an asset impairment. As collective bargaining agreements expire and until negotiations are completed, it is not known whether we will be able to negotiate collective bargaining agreements on the same or more favorable terms as the current agreements, or at all, without production interruptions, including labor stoppages. At December 31, 2013, approximately 3% of our employees were unionized, and from time to time we experience union organizing efforts directed at our non-union employees. We may also experience labor cost increases or disruptions in our non-union facilities in circumstances where we must compete for employees with necessary skills and experience or in tight labor markets.

We must continue to innovate and improve our products to maintain our competitive advantage.

Our ability to maintain and grow our market share depends in part on the ability to continue to develop high quality, innovative products. An important part of our competitive strategy includes leveraging our distributor and dealer relationships and our existing brands to introduce new products. In addition, certain of our products must be designed and manufactured to meet various regulatory standards. We must continue to modify regulated products to meet applicable standards as such standards develop and become more stringent over time. We cannot assure you that our investments in product innovation and technological development will be sufficient or that we will be able to create and market new products to enable us to successfully compete with new products or technologies developed by our competitors or to meet heightened regulatory requirements in the future.

Certain of our operations and products are subject to environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, which may result in substantial compliance costs or otherwise adversely affect our business.

Our operations are subject to numerous federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations relating to protection of the environment, including those that impose limitations on the discharge of pollutants into the air and water, establish standards for the use, treatment, storage and disposal of solid and hazardous materials and wastes, and govern the cleanup of contaminated sites. We have used and continue to use various substances in our products and manufacturing operations, and have generated and continue to generate wastes, which have been or may be deemed to be hazardous or dangerous. As such, our business is subject to and may be materially and adversely affected by compliance obligations and other liabilities under environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. These laws and regulations affect ongoing operations and require capital costs and operating expenditures in order to achieve and maintain compliance. For example, the United States and other countries have established programs for limiting the production, importation and use of certain ozone depleting chemicals, including hydrochlorofluorocarbons, a refrigerant used in our air conditioning and heat pump products. Some of these chemicals have been banned completely, and others have been phased out in the United States. Modifications to the design of our products have been made, and further modifications may be necessary, in order to utilize alternative refrigerants. 

17

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

December 31, 2013

We could incur substantial costs, including cleanup costs, fines and civil or criminal sanctions, as a result of violations of or liabilities under environmental laws.

We could incur substantial costs, including cleanup costs, fines and civil or criminal sanctions, and third party property damage or personal injury claims, as a result of violations of or liabilities under environmental laws, or non-compliance with environmental permits required at our facilities. Certain environmental laws and regulations also impose liability, without regard to knowledge or fault, relating to the existence of contamination at or associated with properties used in our current and former operations, or those of our predecessors, or at locations to which current or former operations or those of our predecessors have shipped waste for disposal. Contaminants have been detected at certain of our former sites, and we have been named as a potentially responsible party at several third-party waste disposal sites. While we are not currently aware of any such sites as to which material outstanding claims or obligations exist, the discovery of additional contaminants or the imposition of additional cleanup obligations at these or other sites could result in significant liability. In addition, we cannot be certain that identification of presently unidentified environmental conditions, more vigorous enforcement by regulatory agencies, enactment of more stringent laws and regulations or other unanticipated events will not arise in the future and give rise to material environmental liabilities or an increase in compliance costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

We face risks of litigation and liability claims on product liability, workers’ compensation and other matters, the extent of which exposure can be difficult or impossible to estimate and which can negatively impact our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

We are subject to legal proceedings and claims arising out of our businesses that cover a wide range of matters, including contract and employment claims, product liability claims, warranty claims and claims for modification, adjustment or replacement of component parts of units sold. Product liability and other legal proceedings include those related to businesses we have acquired or properties we have previously owned or operated.

The development, manufacture, sale and use of our products involves risks of product liability and warranty claims, including personal injury and property damage arising from fire, soot, mold and carbon monoxide. We currently carry insurance and maintain reserves for potential product liability claims. However, our insurance coverage may be inadequate if such claims do arise, and any liability not covered by insurance could have a material adverse effect on our business. The accounting for self-insured plans requires that significant judgments and estimates be made both with respect to the future liabilities to be paid for known claims, and incurred but not reported claims, as of the reporting date. To date, we have been able to obtain insurance in amounts we believe to be appropriate to cover such liability. However, our insurance premiums may increase in the future as a consequence of conditions in the insurance business generally, or our situation in particular. Any such increase could result in lower profits or cause us to reduce our insurance coverage. In addition, a future claim may be brought against us, which would have a material adverse effect on us. Any product liability claim may also include the imposition of punitive damages, the award of which, pursuant to certain state laws, may not be covered by insurance. Our product liability insurance policies have limits that, if exceeded, may result in material costs that would have an adverse effect on future profitability. In addition, warranty claims are generally not covered by our product liability insurance. Further, any product liability or warranty issues may adversely affect our reputation as a manufacturer of high-quality, safe products and could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Product recalls or reworks may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

In the event we produce a product that is alleged to contain a design or manufacturing defect, we could be required to incur costs involved to recall or rework that product. While we have undertaken several voluntary product recalls and reworks over the past several years, additional product recalls and reworks could result in material future costs. Many of our products, especially certain models of bath fans, range hoods, and residential furnaces and air conditioners, have a large installed base, and any recalls and reworks related to products with a large installed base could be particularly costly. The costs of product recalls or reworks are not generally covered by insurance. In addition, our reputation for safety and quality is essential to maintaining market share and protecting our brands. Any recalls or reworks may adversely affect our reputation as a manufacturer of high-quality, safe products and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

18

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

December 31, 2013

Our business operations could be significantly disrupted if we lost members of our management team or key employees.

Our success depends to a significant degree upon the continued contributions of our executive officers, key employees and consultants, both individually and as a group. Our future performance will be substantially dependent on our ability to retain and motivate them. The loss of the services of any of our executive officers, key employees or consultants could prevent us from successfully executing our business strategy.

Our business operations could be negatively impacted if we fail to adequately protect our intellectual property rights, if we fail to comply with the terms of our licenses or if third parties claim that we are in violation of their intellectual property rights.

We are highly dependent on certain of the brand names under which we sell our products. Failure to protect these brand names and other intellectual property rights or to prevent their unauthorized use by third parties could adversely affect our business. We seek to protect our intellectual property rights through a combination of trademark, copyright, patent and trade secret laws, as well as confidentiality agreements. These protections may not be adequate to prevent competitors from using our brand names and trademarks without authorization or from copying our products or developing products equivalent to or superior to ours. We license several brand names from third parties. In the event we fail to comply with the terms of these licenses, we could lose the right to use these brand names. In addition, we face the risk of claims that we are infringing third parties’ intellectual property rights. Any such claim, even if it is without merit, could be expensive and time-consuming; could cause us to cease making, using, or selling certain products that incorporate the disputed intellectual property; could require us, if feasible, to redesign our products; could divert management time and attention; and could require us to enter into costly royalty or licensing arrangements.

We may experience delays or outages in our information technology system and computer networks.

We, like most companies, may be subject to information technology system failures and network disruptions. These may be caused by delays or disruptions due to system updates, natural disasters, malicious attacks, accidents, power disruptions, telecommunication failures, acts of terrorism or war, computer viruses, physical or electronic break−ins, or similar events or disruptions. Our businesses may implement enterprise resource planning systems or add applications to replace outdated systems and to operate more efficiently. Predictions regarding benefits resulting from the implementation of these projects are subject to uncertainties. We may not be able to successfully implement the projects without experiencing difficulties. In addition, any expected benefits of implementing projects might not be realized or the costs of implementation might outweigh the benefits realized.

Volatility in the capital markets could necessitate increased cash contributions by us to our pension plans to maintain required levels of funding.

Volatility in the capital markets may have a significant impact on the funding status of our defined benefit pension plans. If the performance of the capital markets depresses the value of our defined benefit pension plan assets or increases the liabilities, our plans may be underfunded and we would have to make contributions to the pension plans. The amount of contributions we may be required to make to our pension plans in the future is uncertain and could be significant, which may have a material impact on our results of operations. See Note 13, "Pension, Profit Sharing and Other Post-Retirement Benefits", to the consolidated financial statements, Item 8 of Part II, included elsewhere in this report.

Future tax law changes or the interpretation of existing tax laws may materially impact our effective income tax rate and the resolution of unrecognized tax benefits.

Our businesses are subject to income taxation in the U.S. as well as internationally. It is possible that future income tax legislation may be enacted that could have a material adverse impact on our worldwide income tax provision. We are routinely audited by income tax authorities in many jurisdictions. Although we believe that the recorded tax estimates are reasonable and appropriate, there are significant uncertainties in these estimates. As a result, the ultimate outcome from any audit could be materially different from amounts reflected in our income tax provisions and accruals. Future settlements of income tax audits may have a material adverse effect on earnings between the period of initial recognition of tax estimates in our financial statements and the point of ultimate tax audit settlement. See Note 8, "Income Taxes", to the consolidated financial statements, Item 8 of Part II, included elsewhere in this report.

19

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

December 31, 2013

Risks Related to Our Indebtedness:

Our substantial debt could negatively impact our business, prevent us from fulfilling outstanding debt obligations and adversely affect our financial condition.

We have a substantial amount of debt. At December 31, 2013, we had approximately $1,096.8 million of total debt outstanding, which is net of approximately $4.5 million of net unamortized debt premium. The terms of our outstanding debt, including our 8.5% Senior Notes due 2021 (the “8.5% Notes”), our 10% Senior Notes due 2018 (the "10% Notes"), our $300.0 million senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility (the “ABL Facility”) and our senior secured term loan ("Term Loan Facility") limit, but do not prohibit, us from incurring additional debt. If additional debt is added to current debt levels, the related risks described below could intensify.

Our substantial debt has or could have important adverse consequences, including the following:

• our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, refinancing indebtedness or other purposes could be impaired;

• a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations will be dedicated to paying principal and interest on our debt, thereby reducing funds available for expansion or other purposes;

• we are more leveraged than some of our competitors, which may result in a competitive disadvantage;

• we are vulnerable to interest rate increases, as certain of our borrowings, including those under the ABL Facility and the Term Loan Facility, are at variable rates;

• our failure to comply with the restrictions in our financing agreements would have a material adverse effect on us and our ability to meet our obligations under certain of our borrowings;

• we are more vulnerable to changes in general economic conditions than companies with less or no debt;

• we face limitations on our ability to make strategic acquisitions, invest in new products or capital assets or take advantage of business opportunities; and

• we are limited in our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industries in which we operate.

See Note 4, "Notes, Mortgage Notes and Obligations Payable", to the consolidated financial statements, Item 8 of Part II, included elsewhere in this report.

The terms of our debt covenants impose restrictions on how we conduct our business and could limit our ability to raise additional funds.

The agreements that govern the terms of our debt, including the respective indentures that govern our 8.5% Notes and our 10% Notes and the credit agreements that govern our ABL Facility and Term Loan Facility, contain covenants that restrict our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to, among other things:

• incur additional indebtedness;

• pay dividends or make other payment or distributions;

• make loans or investments;

• incur certain liens;

• enter into transactions with affiliates; and

• consolidate, merge or sell assets.

There are limitations on our ability to incur the full $300.0 million of commitments under the ABL Facility. Availability is limited to the lesser of the borrowing base under the ABL Facility and $300.0 million. As of March 7, 2014, we had approximately $5.0 million in outstanding borrowings (excluding approximately $30.0 million borrowed on March 11, 2014) and approximately $13.0 million in outstanding letters of credit under the ABL Facility. Based on the borrowing base calculations as of January 2014, at March 7, 2014, we had excess availability of approximately $237.2 million under the ABL Facility and approximately $205.3 million of excess availability before triggering the cash deposit requirements.

We will be required to deposit cash daily from our material deposit accounts (including all concentration accounts) into collection accounts maintained with the administrative agent under the ABL Facility, which will be used to repay outstanding loans and cash collateralized letters of credit, if (i) excess availability (as defined in the ABL Facility) falls below the greater of $30.0 million or

20

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

December 31, 2013

12.5% of the borrowing base or (ii) an event of default has occurred and is continuing. In addition, under the ABL Facility, if (i) excess availability falls below the greater of $30.0 million or 12.5% of the borrowing base or (ii) an event of default has occurred and is continuing, we will be required to satisfy and maintain a consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio measured on a trailing four quarter basis of not less than 1.0 to 1.0. Our ability to meet the required fixed charge coverage ratio can be affected by events beyond our control. A breach of any of these covenants could result in a default under the ABL Facility.  

A breach of the covenants under the indentures that govern our 8.5% Notes and 10% Notes or the credit agreements that govern the ABL Facility and the Term Loan Facility could result in an event of default under the applicable indenture or credit agreement. Such default may allow the creditors to accelerate the related debt and may result in the acceleration of any other debt to which a cross-acceleration or cross-default provision applies. In addition, an event of default under the ABL Facility would permit the lenders under the ABL Facility to terminate all commitments to extend further credit under that facility. Furthermore, if we were unable to repay the amounts due and payable under our ABL Facility or Term Loan Facility, the lenders to the ABL Facility or the Term Loan Facility, respectively, could proceed against the collateral granted to them to secure that indebtedness. In the event our noteholders or lenders accelerate the repayment of our borrowings, we can provide no assurances that we and our subsidiaries would have sufficient assets to repay such indebtedness. As a result of these restrictions, we may be:

• limited in how we conduct our business;

• unable to raise additional debt or equity financing to operate during general economic or business downturns;

• unable to compete effectively or to take advantage of new business opportunities; or

• unable to grow in accordance with our plans.

See “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Debt Covenant Compliance", Item 7 of Part II, to this report 

We may be unable to generate sufficient cash to service all of our indebtedness and other liquidity requirements and may be forced to take other actions to satisfy such requirements, which may not be successful.

We will be required to repay all amounts outstanding under our ABL Facility in 2017, our Term Loan Facility in 2017, our 10% Notes by 2018 and our 8.5% Notes by 2021. At December 31, 2013, we had outstanding borrowings under these obligations of approximately $1,083.0 million (excluding net unamortized debt premium of approximately $5.0 million). We are currently obligated to make periodic interest payments under the 8.5% Notes, the 10% Notes, the Term Loan Facility and the ABL Facility, as well as make periodic interest and principal payments relating to other indebtedness of our subsidiaries. Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our indebtedness and to fund planned capital expenditures will depend on our ability to generate cash in the future. This, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control.

We expect that we will need to access the capital markets in the future in order to refinance all amounts outstanding under the 8.5% Notes, the 10% Notes, the ABL Facility and the Term Loan Facility, as we do not anticipate generating sufficient cash flow from operations to repay such amounts in full. We cannot assure you that funds will be available to us in the capital markets, together with cash generated from operations, in an amount sufficient to enable us to pay our indebtedness or to fund our other liquidity needs. We cannot assure you that we will be able to refinance any of our indebtedness on commercially reasonable terms or at all. If we cannot service our indebtedness, we may have to take actions such as selling assets, seeking additional equity or reducing or delaying capital expenditures, strategic acquisitions, investments and alliances. We cannot assure you that any such actions, if necessary, could be effected on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

For further information regarding our yearly contractual obligations and sources of liquidity, see “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Contractual Obligations", Item 7 of Part II, to this report.

21

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

December 31, 2013

If we are unable to access funds generated by our subsidiaries, we may not be able to meet our financial obligations.

Because we conduct our operations through our subsidiaries, we depend on those entities for dividends, distributions and other payments to generate the funds necessary to meet our financial obligations. Legal restrictions in the United States and foreign jurisdictions applicable to our subsidiaries and contractual restrictions in certain agreements governing current and future indebtedness of our subsidiaries, as well as the financial condition and operating requirements of our subsidiaries, may limit our ability to obtain cash from our subsidiaries. All of our subsidiaries are separate and independent legal entities and have no obligation whatsoever to pay any dividends, distributions or other payments to us. 

Risks Related to Our Common Stock:

The trading volume in our common stock is less than that of similar public companies.

Although our common stock is listed for trading on the NASDAQ Global Market, the average daily trading volume in our common stock is generally less than that of many of our publicly traded competitors and other diversified manufacturing companies. Public companies such as us, with a relatively concentrated level of institutional shareholders, often have difficulty generating trading volume in their stock. This illiquidity can result in relative price discounts as compared to industry peers or to the stock's inherent value. It can also result in limited or no research analyst coverage, the absence of which may make it difficult for a company to establish and hold a market following. A public trading market having the desired characteristics of depth, liquidity and orderliness depends on the presence of willing buyers and sellers of our common stock at any given time. This presence depends on the individual decisions of investors and general economic and market conditions over which we have no control.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, if they adversely change their recommendations regarding our common stock or if our operating results do not meet their expectations, our common stock price could decline.

The market price of our common stock will be influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts publish about us or our business. Since our common stock began trading on the NASDAQ Global Market, there has been minimal coverage of Nortek by securities analysts. If we do not have analyst coverage of our common stock, we may lack visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause the market price of our common stock or its trading volume to decline. Moreover, if one or more of the analysts who cover our company downgrade our common stock or if our operating results or prospects do not meet their expectations, the market price of our common stock could decline.

22

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

December 31, 2013

The price of our common stock could be volatile.

The overall market and the price of our common stock may fluctuate greatly. The trading price of our common stock may be significantly affected by various factors, including:

• quarterly fluctuations in our operating results;

• changes in investors' and analysts' perception of the business risks and conditions of our business;

• our ability to meet the earnings estimates and other performance expectations of financial analysts or investors;

• unfavorable commentary or downgrades of our stock by equity research analysts;

• fluctuations in the stock prices of our peer companies or in stock markets in general;

• our ability to comply with our debt covenants; and

• general economic or political conditions.

The market price for our common stock could also fall if our existing significant stockholders, or management, sell, or attempt to sell, large amounts of our common stock. Alternatively, if these stockholders do not trade their shares, our common stock could be thinly traded resulting in a wide spread of bid and ask prices for our common stock, which could reduce the trading volume of our common stock.

Our significant stockholder may exert significant influence over us. Their interests may not coincide with yours and they may make decisions with which you may disagree.

Funds affiliated with Ares Management LLC own, in the aggregate, approximately 40% of the voting power of our outstanding common stock as of March 7, 2014 and other stockholders also own significant portions of our common stock. As a result, these stockholders, acting individually or together, control substantially all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and the approval of significant corporate transactions. In addition, this concentration of equity ownership may delay or prevent a change in control of our company and may make some transactions more difficult or impossible without the support of these stockholders. The interests of these stockholders may not always coincide with the interests of other stockholders. Accordingly, these stockholders could cause us to enter into transactions or agreements that you would not approve or make decisions with which you may disagree.

Further, our bylaws and certificate of incorporation allow a majority of our stockholders to take action by written consent, rather than at an annual or special meeting of stockholders. These provisions generally allow our stockholders to act quickly.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

None.

23

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

December 31, 2013

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.

Set forth below is a brief description of the location and general character of the principal administrative and manufacturing facilities and other material real properties of our continuing operations, all of which we consider to be in satisfactory repair as of December 31, 2013. All properties are owned, except for those indicated by an asterisk (*), which are leased under operating leases and those with a double asterisk (**), which are leased under capital leases.

Location	Description	Approximate Square Feet
Residential Ventilation Segment:
Hartford, Wisconsin	Manufacturing/Warehouse/Administrative	538,000		(2)
Hartford, Wisconsin	Warehouse	130,000		*
Mississauga, ONT, Canada	Manufacturing/Warehouse/Administrative	110,000
Fabriano, Italy	Warehouse/Administrative	12,000
Cerreto D’Esi, Italy	Manufacturing/Warehouse/Administrative	174,000
Drummondville, QUE, Canada	Manufacturing/Warehouse/Administrative	126,000
Drummondville, QUE, Canada	Manufacturing/Warehouse/Administrative	51,000		*
Chenjian, Huizhou, PRC	Manufacturing/Warehouse/Administrative/Other	198,000	��
Gliwice, Poland	Manufacturing/Warehouse/Administrative	162,000		(1)
Tecate, Mexico	Manufacturing/Warehouse/Administrative	204,000		*
Alameda, California	Warehouse/Administrative	37,000		*
Technology Solutions Segment:
Xiang, Bao An County, Shenzhen, PRC	Manufacturing/Warehouse/Administrative/Other	410,000		*
Chaiwan, Hong Kong	Administrative	13,000		*
Carlsbad, California	Warehouse/Administrative	86,000		*
Grand Rapids, Michigan	Manufacturing/Warehouse/Administrative	89,000		*
Petaluma, California	Warehouse/Administrative	40,044		*
Tallahassee, Florida	Warehouse/Administrative	71,000		(2)
Summerville, South Carolina	Warehouse/Administrative	162,000		*
Los Angeles, California	Warehouse/Administrative	28,000		*
Erlanger, Kentucky	Warehouse/Administrative	18,000		*
Margate, Kent, United Kingdom	Manufacturing/Warehouse/Administrative	10,000

24

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

December 31, 2013

Location	Description	Approximate Square Feet
Display Mount Solutions Segment:
St. Paul, Minnesota	Manufacturing/Warehouse/Administrative	102,000	(2)
Dongguan City, Guangdong, PRC	Manufacturing/Warehouse/Administrative	198,000	*
Amersfoort, The Netherlands	Manufacturing/Warehouse/Administrative	20,000	*
Residential Heating and Cooling Segment:
O’Fallon, Missouri	Warehouse/Administrative	70,000	*
St. Louis, Missouri	Warehouse	103,000	*
Boonville, Missouri	Manufacturing	250,000	(2)
Boonville, Missouri	Warehouse/Administrative	150,000	(1)
Poplar Bluff, Missouri	Manufacturing/Warehouse	725,000	**
Dyersburg, Tennessee	Manufacturing/Warehouse	368,000	**
Miami, Florida	Warehouse/Administrative	23,000	*
Guaynabo, Puerto Rico	Warehouse	15,000	*
Lenexa, Kansas	Warehouse/Administrative	28,000	*
San Antonio, Texas	Warehouse	19,000	*
Custom & Engineered Solutions Segment:
St. Leonard d’Aston, QUE, Canada	Manufacturing/Administrative	95,000	*
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada	Manufacturing/Administrative	59,000	*
Holland, Michigan	Manufacturing/Administrative	45,000	*
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma	Manufacturing/Administrative	127,000	(2)
Okarche, Oklahoma	Manufacturing/Warehouse/Administrative	228,000	(2)
Springfield, Missouri	Manufacturing/Warehouse/Administrative	113,000	*
Anjou, QUE, Canada	Manufacturing/Administrative	127,000	*
Edenbridge, Kent, United Kingdom	Administrative	41,000	*
Fenton, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom	Manufacturing/Administrative	104,000	*
Tualatin, Oregon	Manufacturing/Warehouse/Administrative	315,000	*
Eden Prairie, Minnesota	Administrative	30,000	*
Shakopee, Minnesota	Warehouse	13,000	*
Other:
Providence, RI	Corporate Headquarters	36,000	*

(1) These facilities are pledged as security under various subsidiary debt agreements.

(2) These facilities are pledged as first priority security under our senior secured term loan ("Term Loan Facility") and as second priority under our $300.0 million senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility (the “ABL Facility”).

25

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

December 31, 2013

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

The Company is from time to time involved in litigation relating to claims arising in the normal course of business, including a number of product liability lawsuits.

The Company does not expect that any of these proceedings will have a material adverse effect, either individually or in the aggregate, on the Company's financial position, results of operations, liquidity or competitive position. See Note 6, “Commitments and Contingencies”, to the consolidated financial statements, Item 8 of Part II, included elsewhere in this report.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

Executive Officers of the Registrant

Pursuant to General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, the following description of our executive officers is included as an unnumbered item in Part I of this report in lieu of being included in our definitive proxy statement for our annual meeting of stockholders. Set forth below are the name, age, present title, and certain other information for each of our executive officers as of March 7, 2014. Each executive officer is appointed by the Company's Board of Directors and holds his/her office until the earlier of his/her death, resignation, retirement, disqualification or removal.

Name	Age	Positions with the Company
Michael J. Clarke	59	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Almon C. Hall	67	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Kevin W. Donnelly	59	Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Timothy J. Burling	55	Senior Vice President, Operational Finance
Sean Burke	52	Group President, Technology Solutions
David J. LaGrand	60	Group President, Residential Heating and Cooling
Peter Segar	51	Group President, Display Mount Solutions
Mark DeVincent	49	Group President, Custom & Engineered Solutions

Mr. Clarke has been President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company since joining the Company on December 30, 2011. From January 2006 until his appointment as the Company's Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Clarke served as President, FlexInfrastructure and Group President of Integrated Network Solutions of Flextronics International, Ltd, a publicly traded provider of design and electronics manufacturing services to original equipment manufacturers ("Flextronics").

Each of Messrs. Hall, Donnelly, and LaGrand has served in the same or substantially similar executive positions with the Company for at least the past five years. Messrs. Hall and Donnelly were executive officers at the Company when it filed voluntary petitions in the Bankruptcy Court seeking relief under the provisions of chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on October 21, 2009.

Mr. Burling has been Vice President, Operational Finance since March 2012 and was appointed Senior Vice President, Operational Finance on March 5, 2014. From 2006 until his appointment as the Company's Senior Vice President, Operational Finance, he served as Vice President, Finance of Integrated Network Solutions of Flextronics.

Mr. Burke has been Group President Technology Solutions since February 2012. From October 2005 until his appointment as the Group President, Technology Solutions, he served as President of FlexComputing at Flextronics.

Mr. Segar has been Group President, Display Mount Solutions Segment since September 2013. Prior to his appointment as the Group President, Display Mount Solutions, he served as Interim President of Ergotron, Inc. (“Ergotron”) from January 2013 to October 2013, he served as Ergotron Brand Products President from August 2010 to October 2013 and he served as Senior Vice President and Chief Technical Officer of Ergotron from September 2004 to August 2010.

Mr. DeVincent has been Group President, Customized Engineering Solutions since February 2014. Prior to his appointment as the Group President, Customized Engineering Solutions, he served as Vice President, Advanced Systems of Flextronics from March 2006 to May 2011 and from June 2011 to January 2014, he served as Senior Vice President & GM, Server & Storage of Flextronics.

26

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

December 31, 2013

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET PRICE OF AND DIVIDENDS ON THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Market Information

Our common stock trades on the NASDAQ Global Market ("NASDAQ") under the trading symbol “NTK”. The following table sets forth the high and low sale prices for our common stock as reported by NASDAQ for the periods indicated:

2012 Quarter Ended	High		Low
March 31, 2012	$	44.96	$	26.00
June 30, 2012	$	58.38	$	39.25
September 29, 2012	$	55.83	$	48.94
December 31, 2012	$	67.74	$	54.49
2013 Quarter Ended	High		Low
March 30, 2013	$	74.68	$	64.84
June 29, 2013	$	73.73	$	61.47
September 28, 2013	$	70.00	$	62.34
December 31, 2013	$	76.82	$	65.95

Holders

As of March 3, 2014, there were approximately 112 holders of record of our common stock and an unknown number of additional beneficial owners whose shares are held through brokerage firms or other institutions.

Dividends

We did not pay any cash dividends on our common stock in 2013 or 2012, and we do not anticipate declaring any cash dividends to holders of our common stock in the foreseeable future. Furthermore, the agreements that govern the terms of our debt, including the respective indentures that govern our 8.5% Notes and our 10% Notes, and the credit agreements that govern our ABL Facility and Term Loan Facility, restrict our ability to pay dividends. See “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Adequacy of Liquidity Sources” and “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources  - Debt Covenant Compliance”, Item 7 of Part II of this report, for further information regarding restrictions on our ability to pay dividends. In addition, the declaration of any future cash dividends and, if declared, the amount of any such dividends will be subject to our financial condition, earnings, capital requirements, financial covenants and other contractual restrictions and to the discretion of our Board of Directors.

27

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

December 31, 2013

Performance Graph

Set forth below is a graph comparing the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock against the cumulative total return of the Russell 2000 Index and the Dow Jones US Building Materials & Fixtures Index for the period commencing November 15, 2011 (the first day our common stock began “when-issued” trading on the NASDAQ) through December 31, 2013. Index data was furnished by Dow Jones & Co. and Russell Investments Group. The graph assumes that $100 was invested on November 15, 2011 in each of our common stock, the Russell 2000 Index, and the Dow Jones US Building Materials & Fixtures Index and that all dividends were reinvested.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

There were no unregistered sales of equity securities during the fourth quarter of 2013.

Purchases of Equity Securities by Issuer and Affiliated Purchases

None.

28

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

December 31, 2013

ITEM 6. SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

The table below summarizes our selected consolidated financial information as of and for the periods indicated. You should read the following selected consolidated financial data together with our consolidated financial statements, Item 8 of Part II, to this report, the sections entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Liquidity and Capital Resources”, Item 7 of Part II, to this report, and the section entitled “Market Price of and Dividends on the Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters” included in Item 5 of Part II, to this report. Our historical results for any prior period are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected in any future period.

	Successor														Predecessor
	For the Years Ended											Period from			Period from
	December 31,											Dec. 20, 2009 -			Jan. 1, 2009 -
	2013			2012		2011			2010			Dec. 31, 2009			Dec. 19, 2009
	(In millions except per share amounts and ratios)
Consolidated Summary of Operations:
Net sales	$	2,287.9		$	2,201.3	$	2,140.5		$	1,899.3		$	44.0		$	1,763.9
Pre-petition reorganization items	—			—		—			—			—			(22.5		)
Goodwill impairment charge	—			—		—			—			—			(284.0		)
Operating earnings (loss)	87.9			127.6		63.1			70.6			(1.2		)	(203.4		)
(Loss) earnings before gain on   reorganization items, net and (benefit)   provision for income taxes	(11.4		)	24.8		(76.2		)	(25.0		)	(4.8		)	(338.8		)
Gain on reorganization items, net	—			—		—			—			—			619.1
Net (loss) earnings	(8.3		)	9.5		(55.9		)	(13.4		)	(3.4		)	195.3
(Loss) earnings per share:
Basic (1)	$	(0.54	)	$	0.63	$	(3.70	)	$	(0.89	)	$	(0.23	)	$	65,100.00
Diluted (1)	$	(0.54	)	$	0.61	$	(3.70	)	$	(0.89	)	$	(0.23	)	$	65,100.00
Financial Position and Other Financial Data:
Unrestricted cash, investments and   marketable securities	$	80.9		$	144.7	$	58.2		$	57.7		$	89.6		$	86.7
Working capital (2)	250.3			348.0		317.5			330.5			320.8			323.3
Total assets	1,990.9			1,888.1		1,941.9			1,973.1			1,620.9			1,645.4
Total debt —
Current	3.5			3.1		33.4			17.8			49.9			53.8
Long-term	1,093.3			1,097.9		1,111.1			1,101.8			835.4			835.4
Current ratio (3)	1.6:1			1.9:1		1.8:1			1.9:1			1.9:1			1.9:1
Debt to equity ratio (4)	11.0:1			11.7:1		14.2:1			7.1:1			5.2:1			5.2:1
Depreciation and amortization   expense, including non-cash interest (5)	97.6			89.3		99.9			93.8			6.2			103.2
Capital expenditures (6)	43.9			25.0		21.1			19.8			0.5			17.9
Stockholders’ investment	99.9			94.2		80.4			158.8			170.1			172.0

(1) See Note 11, "(Loss) Earnings per Share", to the consolidated financial statements, Item 8 of Part II, included elsewhere in this report.

(2) Working capital is computed by subtracting current liabilities from current assets.

(3) Current ratio is computed by dividing current assets by current liabilities.

(4) Debt to equity ratio is computed by dividing total debt by total stockholders’ investment. 

(5) Includes an increase to cost of goods sold for inventory acquired in business combinations of approximately $3.3 million, $0.9 million, $7.9 million, $12.2 million, $3.1 million and $0.5 million for 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010 and the periods from December 20, 2009 to December 31, 2009 and from January 1, 2009 to December 19, 2009, respectively.

(6) Includes capital expenditures financed under capital leases of approximately $0.1 million and $0.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

29

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 31, 2013

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Executive Overview

We are a global, diversified company whose many market-leading brands deliver broad capabilities and a wide array of innovative, technology-driven products and solutions for lifestyle improvement at home and at work. Our five reporting segments are as follows:

• the Residential Ventilation (“RESV”) segment,

• the Technology Solutions (“TECH”) segment,

• the Display Mount Solutions ("DMS") segment,

• the Residential Heating and Cooling (“RHC”) segment, and

• the Custom & Engineered Solutions (“CES”) segment.

Through these segments we manufacture and sell, primarily in the United States, Canada, and Europe, with additional manufacturing in China and Mexico, a wide variety of products for the remodeling and replacement markets, the residential and commercial new construction markets, the manufactured housing market, and the personal and enterprise computer markets.

The RESV segment primarily manufactures and sells room and whole house ventilation and other products, primarily for the professional remodeling and replacement markets, the residential new construction market, and the do-it-yourself market. The principal products sold by this segment include kitchen range hoods, exhaust fans (such as bath fans and fan, heater and light combination units), and indoor air quality products. Sales of our kitchen range hoods and exhaust fans within the RESV segment accounted for approximately 10.7% and 9.8%, respectively, of consolidated net sales for 2013, approximately 11.6% and 10.0%, respectively, of consolidated net sales in 2012 and approximately 11.9% and 9.2%, respectively, of consolidated net sales in 2011.

The TECH segment manufactures and distributes a broad array of products designed to provide convenience and security for residential and certain commercial applications. The principal product categories sold in this segment include audio/video distribution and control equipment, and security and access control products. Sales of security and access control products accounted for approximately 66%, 53% and 54% of total TECH segment net sales in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

The DMS segment manufactures and distributes a broad array of products designed with ergonomic features including wall mounts, desk mounts, arms, carts, workstations, and stands that attach to or support a variety of display devices such as computer monitors, notebook computers and flat panel displays. Sales of our digital display mounting and mobility products within the DMS segment accounted for approximately 12.0%, 12.9% and 12.7% of consolidated net sales in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

The RHC segment manufactures and sells heating, ventilating, and air conditioning systems for site-built residential and manufactured housing structures, and certain commercial markets. The principal products sold by the segment are split-system and packaged air conditioners and heat pumps, air handlers, furnaces, and related equipment. Sales of products sold in our RHC segment accounted for approximately 18.1%, 17.3% and 17.7% of consolidated net sales in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

The CES segment manufactures and sells custom-designed and engineered heating, ventilating and air conditioning products and systems that meet customer specifications. The principal products sold by the segment are air handlers and large custom rooftop cooling and heating products. Sales of our commercial air handlers within the CES segment accounted for approximately 15.4%, 14.6% and 11.4% of consolidated net sales in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

On March 11, 2013, our Board of Directors approved our operational improvement initiatives and efforts to rationalize our global manufacturing and distribution capacity. See "- Liquidity and Capital Resources - Operational Improvement Initiatives” below.

30

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 31, 2013

Basis of Presentation

We operate on a calendar year, and for our interim periods, operate on a 4-4-5 fiscal calendar, where each fiscal quarter is comprised of two 4-week periods and one 5-week period, with each week ending on a Saturday. Our fiscal year always begins on January 1 and ends on December 31. As a result, our first and fourth quarters may have more or less days included than a traditional 4-4-5 fiscal calendar, which consists of 91 days.

This Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ("MD&A") is intended to help the reader understand Nortek, Inc., our operations, and our present business environment. MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes contained in this report. Unless the context requires otherwise, the terms “Nortek,” “Company,” “we”, and “our” in this MD&A refer to Nortek, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries.

Industry Overview

Critical factors affecting our future performance, including our level of sales, profitability, and cash flows are the levels of residential remodeling and replacement activity, and new residential and non-residential construction activity. The level of new construction activity and the level of residential remodeling and replacement activity are affected by seasonality and cyclical factors such as interest rates, inflation, consumer spending, employment levels, and other macroeconomic factors over which we have no control. Any decline in economic activity as a result of these or other factors typically results in a decline in residential and non-residential new construction and, to a lesser extent, residential and non-residential remodeling and replacement spending, which would result in a decrease in our sales, profitability, and cash flows.

Instability in the credit and financial markets, troubles in the mortgage market, the level of unemployment, and the decline in home values could have a negative impact on residential and non-residential new construction activity, consumer disposable income, and spending on home remodeling and repairs. These factors could have an adverse effect on our operating results.

Changes in key industry activity affecting our businesses in the North America for 2013, 2012, and 2011 as compared to the prior year periods were as follows:

	Source of	% Increase (Decrease)
	Data	2013		2012		2011
Private residential construction spending	1	18	%	15	%	2	%
Total U.S. housing starts	1	19	%	28	%	4	%
Total Canadian housing starts	2	(13	)%	11	%	2	%
New home sales	1	16	%	21	%	(5	)%
Existing home sales	3	9	%	9	%	2	%
Residential improvement spending	1	4	%	4	%	8	%
Central air conditioning and heat pump shipments	4	10	%	2	%	7	%
Gas furnace shipments	4	16	%	1	%	(10	)%
Private non-residential construction spending	1	(1	)%	16	%	(2	)%
Manufactured housing shipments	5	10	%	6	%	3	%
Residential fixed investment spending	6	12	%	13	%	1	%

Source of data:

(1) U.S. Census Bureau

(2) Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation

(3) National Association of Realtors

(4) Air Conditioning, Heating and Refrigeration Institute

(5) Institute for Building Technology and Safety

(6) U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis

31

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 31, 2013

In 2013, approximately 52% of consolidated net sales were made through independent distributors, dealers, wholesalers and similar channels, approximately 16% were to commercial HVAC markets, approximately 13% were to retailers (of which approximately 7% were sold to the four largest home center retailers), approximately 11% were private label sales, approximately 5% were to other commercial channels, and approximately 3% were to manufactured housing original equipment manufacturers and aftermarket dealers. Our largest distributor or dealer accounted for approximately 4% of consolidated net sales in 2013. Our largest customer (other than a distributor or dealer) accounted for approximately 3% of consolidated net sales for 2013.

Based on internal research and analysis, we estimate that approximately 65% to 69% of our consolidated 2013 net sales were related to the residential housing market. Our products that serve the residential housing market primarily include range hoods and bath fans sold by our RESV segment, central air conditioning and heating products sold by our RHC segment, and security and access control products and certain of the audio/video distribution and control products sold by our TECH segment. We believe that approximately 18% to 22% of our consolidated 2013 net sales to the residential housing market were related to new construction activity.

Also based on internal research and analysis, we estimate that approximately 31% to 35% of our consolidated 2013 net sales were related to non-residential applications including healthcare and educational institutions. Our products that serve the non-residential market primarily include air handlers and other heating and cooling products sold by our CES segment, digital mounting and mobility products sold by our DMS segment, and certain of the audio/video distribution and control products sold by our TECH segment. We believe that approximately 30% to 34% of our consolidated 2013 net sales to the non-residential market were related to new construction activity.

The demand for certain of our products is seasonal, particularly in the Northeast and Midwest regions of the United States. Inclement weather during winter months usually reduces the level of building and remodeling activity in both home improvement and new construction markets, thereby reducing our sales levels during the first and fourth quarters.

We are subject to the effects of changing prices and the impact of inflation which could have a significant adverse effect on our results of operations. In some circumstances, market conditions or customer expectations may prevent us from increasing the prices of our products to offset the inflationary pressures that may increase costs in the future. We continually review the costs of our product lines and look for opportunities to help offset the rising costs of raw materials and transportation when possible.  

During the past three years, the following have been our major purchases, expressed as a percentage of consolidated net sales, of raw materials and purchased components:

	For the Year Ended December 31,
	2013	2012	2011
Steel	6%	6%	6%
Motors	4%	4%	4%
Compressors	3%	2%	3%
Plastics	3%	3%	3%
Copper	2%	2%	2%
Electrical	2%	2%	3%
Aluminum	2%	2%	2%
Packaging	2%	1%	2%

32

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 31, 2013

Outlook

In 2014, we anticipate that both residential and non-residential construction activity will be higher than the levels experienced in 2013. We expect that colder-than-normal temperatures in certain regions will have an impact on construction activity in the first few months of 2014. When temperatures are too cold, projects may start later than planned and for projects that are underway, frigid temperatures may cause delays. Colder weather can also have an impact on consumer spending levels, and this could negatively impact certain of our businesses in the beginning of 2014. Also potentially affecting our performance in the first quarter of 2014 is the timing of expected orders from a major customer in our TECH segment, which we anticipate will now be received in the second quarter instead of the first quarter. Despite a slower start to 2014, we expect continued growth in residential new construction activity. We also anticipate that spending on residential improvement projects will increase, albeit at a slower pace than new construction. Our expectation for 2014 is that demand for residential security and home automation products will continue to increase over the levels experienced in 2013. Finally, for non-residential markets, we expect modest growth in the institutional segment, which is a major market for our CES and DMS segments.

As discussed below in "- Liquidity and Capital Resources - Operational Improvement Initiatives", we are well along in a transformation process focused on improving our strategic sourcing and supply chain capabilities, streamlining our warehousing and logistics, and optimizing our manufacturing footprint. Although our investments in these initiatives have reduced our operating margins in recent quarters, we believe they began to generate savings as planned in the fourth quarter, primarily related to sourcing improvements.

With these operational initiatives under way, we believe that we are in a position to focus more of our attention on ways to increase net sales. Toward that end, we have begun to execute on various marketing and product development strategies aimed at adding products that can accelerate our growth by leveraging our brands and distribution channels. We are approaching 2014 with a cautiously optimistic view of our end markets and with a keen focus on driving improvement through our transformation initiatives and sales growth strategies.

Acquisitions

We account for acquisitions under the purchase method of accounting and accordingly, the results of these acquisitions are included in our consolidated results from the date of their acquisition. We have made the following acquisitions since January 1, 2011: 

Reporting Segment	Acquired Company	Acquisition Date	Primary Business of Acquired Company
TECH	TV One Broadcast Sales Corporation; Barcom (UK) Holdings Limited; and Barcom Asia Holdings, LLC (collectively, "TV One")	April 28, 2011	Design, manufacture and sale of a complete range of video signal processing products for the professional audio/video and broadcast markets.
TECH	Gefen Distribution Verwaltungs GmbH ("Gefen Distribution")	February 22, 2013	Distributes Gefen products in Europe.
TECH	2GIG Technologies, Inc. (“2GIG”)	April 1, 2013	Designs and supplies residential security and home automation systems

33

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 31, 2013

Critical Accounting Estimates

This MD&A is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("US GAAP"). Certain of our accounting policies require the application of judgment in selecting the appropriate assumptions for calculating financial estimates. By their nature, these judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. We periodically evaluate the judgments and estimates used for our critical accounting policies to ensure that such judgments and estimates are reasonable for our interim and year-end reporting requirements. These judgments and estimates are based upon our historical experience, current trends and other information available, as appropriate. If actual conditions are different from those assumptions used in our judgments, actual results could be materially different from our estimates. Our critical accounting policies are discussed below.

Revenue Recognition, Accounts Receivable and Related Expenses

We generally recognize sales based upon shipment of products to customers and have procedures in place at each of our subsidiaries to ensure that an accurate cut-off is obtained for each reporting period. We consider revenue to be realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of a sales arrangement exists; delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; the price is fixed or determinable; and collectability is reasonably assured. Revenue is recognized upon passage of title and risk of loss to customers, unless we are required to provide additional services, and provided we can form an estimate for sales returns. When a sale arrangement involves training, installation, or other deliverables, the arrangement is evaluated to determine whether it represents a multiple element arrangement. We recognize revenue on such multiple-element arrangements in accordance with Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2009-13, "Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements" ("ASU 2009-13"), based on the estimated selling price of each element. In accordance with ASU 2009-13, we use vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”), if available, to determine the selling price of each element. If VSOE is not available, we use third-party evidence or our best estimated selling price to determine the selling price for each element.

Allowances for cash discounts, volume rebates, other customer incentive programs and gross customer returns, among others, are recorded as a reduction of sales at the time of sale based upon the estimated future outcome. Cash discounts, volume rebates and other customer incentive programs are based upon certain percentages agreed to with our various customers, which are typically earned by the customer over an annual period. We record periodic estimates for these amounts based upon the historical results to date, estimated future results through the end of the contract period, and the contractual provisions of the customer agreements. For calendar year customer agreements, we are able to adjust our periodic estimates to actual amounts as of December 31 each year based upon the contractual provisions of the customer agreements. For those customers who have agreements that are not on a calendar year cycle, we record estimates at December 31 consistent with the above described methodology. Customers are generally not required to provide collateral for purchases. As a result, at the end of any given reporting period, the amounts recorded for these allowances are based upon estimates of the likely outcome of future sales with the applicable customers and may require adjustment in the future if the actual outcome differs. We believe that our procedures for estimating such amounts are reasonable.

Customer returns are recorded on an actual basis throughout the year and also include an estimate at the end of each reporting period for future customer returns related to sales recorded prior to the end of the period. We generally estimate customer returns based upon the time lag that historically occurs between the date of the sale and the date of the return, while also factoring in any new business conditions that might impact the historical analysis, such as new product introductions. We believe that our procedures for estimating such amounts are reasonable.

Provisions for the estimated allowance for doubtful accounts are recorded in selling, general and administrative expense, net ("SG&A"). The amounts recorded are generally based upon historically derived percentages while also factoring in any new business conditions that might impact the historical analysis such as changes in economic conditions, past due and nonperforming accounts, bankruptcies or other events affecting particular customers. We also periodically evaluate the adequacy of our allowance for doubtful accounts recorded in our consolidated balance sheet as a further test to ensure the adequacy of the recorded provisions. The analysis for allowance for doubtful accounts often involves subjective analysis of a particular customer’s ability to pay. As a result, significant judgment is required in determining the appropriate amounts to record and such judgments may prove to be incorrect in the future. We believe that our procedures for estimating such amounts are reasonable.

34

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 31, 2013

Inventory Valuation

We value inventories at the lower of the cost or market with approximately 29% of our inventory at December 31, 2013 valued using the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) method and the remainder valued using the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method. In connection with both LIFO and FIFO inventories, we record provisions, as appropriate, to write-down obsolete and excess inventory to estimated net realizable value. The process for evaluating obsolete and excess inventory often requires us to make subjective judgments and estimates concerning future sales levels, quantities, and prices at which such inventory will be able to be sold in the normal course of business. Accelerating the disposal process or incorrect estimates of future sales potential may cause the actual results to differ from the estimates at the time such inventory is disposed or sold. We believe that our procedures for estimating such amounts are reasonable. See Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies”, to the consolidated financial statements, Item 8 of Part II, included elsewhere in this report.

Income Taxes

We account for income taxes using the liability method in accordance with ASC 740, “Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”), which requires that the deferred tax consequences of temporary differences between the amounts recorded in our consolidated financial statements and the amounts included in our federal, state and foreign income tax returns to be recognized in the balance sheet. As we generally do not file our income tax returns until well after the closing process for the December 31 financial statements is complete, the amounts recorded at December 31 reflect estimates of what the final amounts will be when the actual tax returns are filed for that fiscal year. In addition, estimates are often required with respect to, among other things, the appropriate state income tax rates to use in the various states that we and our subsidiaries are required to file, the potential utilization of operating and capital loss carry-forwards and valuation allowances required, if any, for tax assets that may not be realizable in the future. We require each of our subsidiaries to submit year-end tax information packages as part of the year-end financial statement closing process so that the information used to estimate the deferred tax accounts at December 31 is reasonably consistent with the amounts expected to be included in the filed tax returns. ASC 740 requires balance sheet classification of current and long-term deferred income tax assets and liabilities based upon the classification of the underlying asset or liability that gives rise to a temporary difference. As such, we have historically had deferred tax assets due principally to the unfavorable tax consequences of recording expenses for required book reserves for such things as, among others, bad debts, inventory valuation, insurance, product liability and warranty that cannot be deducted for income tax purposes until such expenses are actually paid. In addition, the Company has deferred tax liabilities related to basis differences in intangible assets and in property and equipment. We believe the procedures and estimates used in our accounting for income taxes are reasonable and in accordance with established tax law. The income tax estimates used have historically not resulted in material adjustments to income tax expense in subsequent periods when the estimates are adjusted to the actual filed tax return amounts, although there may be reclassifications between the current and long-term portion of the deferred tax accounts. See Note 8, “Income Taxes”, to the consolidated financial statements, Item 8 of Part II, included elsewhere in this report.

35

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 31, 2013

Goodwill

Evaluation of Goodwill Impairment

Our accounting for acquired goodwill requires considerable judgment in the valuation thereof, and the ongoing evaluation of potential impairment. Goodwill is not amortized. Instead, it is evaluated for impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently when an event occurs or circumstances change between annual tests that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying value, including a significant adverse change in the business climate, among others. We have set the annual evaluation date as of the first day of our fiscal fourth quarter. The reporting units evaluated for goodwill impairment have been determined to be the same as our operating segments. Only the RESV, DMS, and TECH reporting units have goodwill and, therefore, are the only reporting units that currently are required to be evaluated for goodwill impairment.

In 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2011-08, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment (“ASU 2011-8”), which introduced an optional qualitative assessment for testing goodwill impairment. Under ASU 2011-8, if we conclude that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds the carrying amount, we are not required to perform the annual quantitative two-step impairment test under ASC 350, Goodwill and Other (“ASC 350”). We adopted ASU 2011-8 in 2011 and used the qualitative assessment approach in connection with our 2012 annual impairment evaluation for the RESV and DMS reporting units, and our 2011 annual impairment evaluation for the RESV, DMS and TECH reporting units. We used the quantitative assessment approach in connection with our 2013 annual impairment evaluation for the RESV, TECH and DMS reporting units and our 2012 annual impairment evaluation for the TECH reporting unit. Although we do not believe that there are any indicators of goodwill impairment, we believe that it is appropriate to periodically perform quantitative analysis of goodwill to provide a basis of support for future qualitative assessments, which is the reason that we used the quantitative assessment approach in 2013.

The following analyses were performed in connection with our annual qualitative assessment under ASU 2011-8 and are performed, if necessary, on an interim basis in order to determine if it is more likely than not that the fair value of any of our applicable reporting units are below the respective carrying amounts:

• We review public information from competitors and other industry information to determine if there are any significant adverse trends in our competitors' businesses, such as significant declines in market capitalization or significant goodwill impairment charges that could be an indication that the goodwill of our reporting units is potentially impaired.

• We review changes in our market capitalization and overall enterprise valuation to determine if there are any significant decreases that could be an indication that the valuation of our reporting units has significantly decreased.

• We review, and update if necessary, our long-term 5-year financial projections and compare them to the prior long-term 5-year projections to determine if there has been a significant adverse change that could materially lower our prior valuation conclusions under both the discounted cash flow ("DCF") approach and the earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA") multiple approach.

• We determine if there have been any significant increases to the weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”) rates for each reporting unit, which could materially lower our prior valuation conclusions under the DCF approach.

• We determine if there have been any significant decreases to our estimated EBITDA multiples, which could materially lower our prior valuation conclusions under the EBITDA multiple approach.

• We determine the current carrying value for each reporting unit as of the end of the quarter and compare it to the previously determined amount in order to determine if there has been any significant increase that could impact our prior goodwill impairment assessments.

• We also, as necessary, run pro forma models substituting the new assumption information derived from the above analyses to determine the impact that such assumption changes would have had on the prior valuations. These pro forma calculations assist us in determining whether or not the new valuation assumption information would have resulted in a significant decrease in the fair value of any of the reporting units.

36

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 31, 2013

Based on these analyses, we make a final determination as to whether or not it is more likely than not that the fair value of any reporting unit with goodwill is lower than its carrying value. If this were to be the case, then a “Step 1 Test” is required under ASC 350. The Step 1 Test compares the estimated fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value. If the estimated fair value is lower than the carrying value, there is an indication of goodwill impairment and a “Step 2 Test” is required. If the estimated fair value of the reporting unit exceeds the carrying value, no further goodwill impairment testing is required.

The Step 1 fair value estimation includes a combination of a DCF approach and an EBITDA multiple approach. The DCF approach requires that we forecast future cash flows of the reporting unit(s) and discount the cash flow stream(s) based upon a WACC rate that is derived, in part, from comparable companies within similar industries. The DCF calculations also include a terminal value calculation that is based upon an expected long-term growth rate for the applicable reporting unit. The EBITDA multiple approach requires that we estimate certain valuation multiples of EBITDA derived from comparable companies and apply those derived EBITDA multiples to the applicable reporting unit EBITDA for the selected EBITDA measurement periods. We then evaluate what we believe to be the appropriate weighted average of the DCF approach and the EBITDA multiple approach in order to arrive at our estimated fair value.

The key assumptions used in order to determine the appropriate WACC rates for the DCF approach are as follows:

• A risk free rate based on the 20-year United States Treasury bond yield.

• A market risk premium based on our assessment of the additional risk associated with equity investment that is determined, in part, through the use of published historical equity risk studies as adjusted for the business risk index for each reporting unit. The business risk index is derived from comparable companies and measures the estimated stock price volatility. As such, changes in the market risk premium between periods reflect changes in the business risk index for the reporting units.

• Comparable company and market interest rate information is used to determine the cost of debt and the appropriate long-term capital structure in order to weight the cost of debt and the cost of equity into an overall WACC.

• A size risk premium based on the value of the reporting unit that is determined through the use of published historical size risk premia data.

• A specific risk premium for the cost of equity, as necessary, which factors in overall economic and stock market volatility conditions at the time the WACC is estimated.

2013 Annual Impairment Test

For the 2013 annual impairment test for RESV, DMS and TECH, we estimated the fair value of each of the reporting units using a weighted average of 50% for the DCF approach and 50% for the EBITDA approach, which we determined to be the most representative allocation for the estimate of the long-term fair value of the reporting units. The RESV valuation assumed a taxable transaction while the DMS and TECH valuations each assumed a non-taxable transaction, with WACC’s of 13.2%, 13.4% and 14.5%, respectively, and EBITDA multiples in the range of 7.5x to 8.0x, 6.5x to 7.5x and 7.0x to 8.5x, respectively, for the selected measurement periods of the latest twelve months through September 30, 2013, and forecasted 2013 and 2014. As the estimated fair value of RESV, DMS and TECH was greater than the carrying value, no Step 2 test for goodwill impairment was required. The Company did not prepare updated goodwill impairment analyses as of December 31, 2013 for any reporting unit, as there were no indicators during the quarter that would have required such analysis.

We believe that our assumptions used to estimate the fair value of RESV, DMS and TECH as of the first day of the fourth quarter were reasonable. If different assumptions were used, particularly with respect to estimating future cash flows, weighted average costs of capital, and terminal growth rates, different estimates of fair value may have resulted. The estimated fair values of the RESV, DMS, and TECH reporting units would have to decrease by approximately 50.7%, 39.5%, and 23.8%, respectively, before a potential impairment would be recognized.

37

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 31, 2013

2012 Annual Impairment Test

We determined that it was appropriate for us to use the qualitative assessment approach under ASU 2011-8 for the 2012 annual goodwill impairment evaluation performed as of the first day of the fourth quarter based on the fact that the estimated fair values of the RESV and DMS derived in our valuation analysis continued to be significantly in excess of the carrying values. Based on the qualitative analysis performed, as described above, we determined that it was more likely than not that the fair value of each of these evaluated reporting units was greater than their carrying amounts as of the first day of the fourth quarter. Accordingly, we were not required to perform the two-step impairment test under ASC 350 for 2012 for RESV and DMS.

For the 2012 annual impairment test for TECH, we estimated the fair value of the reporting unit using a weighted average of 50% for the DCF approach and 50% for the EBITDA approach, which we determined to be the most representative allocation for the estimate of the long-term fair value of the reporting unit. The TECH valuation assumed a taxable transaction, with a WACC of 16.9%, and EBITDA multiples in the range of 7.5x to 8.5x for the selected measurement periods of the latest twelve months through September 29, 2012, and forecasted 2012 and 2013. As the estimated fair value of TECH was greater than the carrying value, no Step 2 test for goodwill impairment was required.

We believe that our assumptions used to estimate the fair value of TECH as of the first day of the fourth quarter were reasonable. If different assumptions were used, particularly with respect to estimating future cash flows, weighted average costs of capital, and terminal growth rates, different estimates of fair value may have resulted. We estimate that the fair value of TECH would have needed to be reduced by approximately 19.5% to reduce the estimated fair value to an amount below the carrying value.

As of December 31, 2012, we determined that there were no indicators of impairment and, therefore, no interim impairment testing was required for the RESV, DMS, or TECH reporting units as of that date.

2011 Annual Impairment Test

We determined that it was appropriate for us to use the qualitative assessment approach under ASU 2011-8 for the 2011 annual goodwill impairment evaluation based on the fact that the fair values of the RESV and TECH reporting units were significantly in excess of the carrying values in 2010, and the fact that substantially all of the DMS reporting unit was a recently completed acquisition at the time. Based on the qualitative analysis performed, as described above, we determined that it was more likely than not that the fair value of each of the three evaluated reporting units was greater than their carrying amounts as of the first day of the fourth quarter. Accordingly, we were not required to perform the two-step impairment test under ASC 350 for 2011.

As of December 31, 2011, we determined that there were no indicators of impairment and, therefore, no interim impairment testing was required for the RESV, DMS, or TECH reporting units as of that date.

See Note 3, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, to the consolidated financial statements, Item 8 of Part II, included elsewhere in this report.

Other Long-Lived Assets

In accordance with ASC 360, “Property, Plant and Equipment” (“ASC 360”), we evaluate the realizability of long-lived assets, which primarily consists of property and equipment and definite-lived intangible assets (the “ASC 360 Long-Lived Assets”), when events or business conditions warrant it, as well as whenever an interim goodwill impairment test is required under ASC 350. ASC 350 requires that the ASC 360 impairment test be completed, and any ASC 360 impairment be recorded, prior to performing the goodwill impairment test.

In accordance with ASC 360, the evaluation of the impairment of long-lived assets, other than goodwill, is based on expectations of non-discounted future cash flows compared to the carrying value of the long-lived asset groups. If the sum of the expected non-discounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the ASC 360 Long-Lived Assets, we would recognize an impairment loss if the carrying amount of the asset group exceeds its fair value. Our cash flow estimates are based upon historical cash flows, as well as future projected cash flows received from subsidiary management in connection with our annual company-wide planning process and interim forecasting, and, if appropriate, include a terminal valuation for the applicable subsidiary based upon an EBITDA multiple. We estimate the EBITDA multiples by reviewing comparable company information and other industry data. We believe

38

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 31, 2013

that our procedures for estimating gross future cash flows, including the terminal valuation, were reasonable and consistent with current market conditions for each of the dates when impairment testing has been performed.

For the year ended December 31, 2013, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of approximately $4.3 million within COGS related to the write-down of property and equipment in connection with the exit in the first quarter of 2014 of a product line within the RESV segment. There were no other long-lived asset impairment charges recorded during 2012 or 2011. See Note 3, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, to the consolidated financial statements, Item 8 of Part II, included elsewhere in this report.

Pensions and Post-Retirement Health Benefits

Our accounting for pensions, including supplemental executive retirement plans and post-retirement health benefit liabilities, requires estimates of such items as the long-term average return on plan assets, the discount rate, the rate of compensation increase and the assumed medical cost inflation rate. We utilize long-term investment-grade bond yields as the basis for selecting a discount rate by which plan obligations are measured. An analysis of projected cash flows for each plan is performed in order to determine plan-specific duration. Discount rates are selected based on high quality corporate bond yields of similar durations. These estimates require a significant amount of judgment as items such as stock market fluctuations, changes in interest rates, plan amendments, and curtailments can have a significant impact on the assumptions used and, therefore, on the ultimate final actuarial determinations for a particular year. We believe the procedures and estimates used in our accounting for pensions and post-retirement health benefits are reasonable and consistent with acceptable actuarial practices in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. See Note 13, “Pension, Profit Sharing and Other Post-Retirement Benefits”, to the consolidated financial statements, Item 8 of Part II, included elsewhere in this report.

Product Warranties

We sell a number of products and offer a number of warranties including, in some instances, extended warranties for which we receive proceeds. The specific terms and conditions of these warranties vary depending on the product sold and the country in which the product is sold. We estimate the costs that may be incurred under our warranties, with the exception of extended warranties, and record a liability for such costs at the time of sale. Deferred revenue from extended warranties is recorded at the estimated fair value and is amortized over the life of the warranty. The related deferred revenue is reviewed to ensure that the amount recorded is equal to or greater than estimated future costs. Factors that affect our warranty liability include the number of units sold, historical and anticipated rates of warranty claims, cost per claim, and new product introduction. We periodically assess the adequacy of our recorded reserves for warranty claims and adjust the amounts as necessary. Warranty claims can extend far into the future. As a result, significant judgment is required in determining the appropriate amounts to record and such judgments may prove to be incorrect in the future. We believe that our procedures for estimating such amounts are reasonable. See Note 6, “Commitments and Contingencies”, to the consolidated financial statements, Item 8 of Part II, included elsewhere in this report.

Insurance Liabilities, including Product Liability

We record insurance liabilities and related expenses for health, workers compensation, product and general liability losses, and other insurance reserves and expenses in accordance with either the contractual terms of our policies or, if self-insured, the total liabilities that are estimable and probable as of the reporting date. Insurance liabilities are recorded as current liabilities to the extent payments are expected to be made in the succeeding year, with the remaining requirements classified as long-term liabilities. The accounting for self-insured plans requires that significant judgments and estimates be made both with respect to the future liabilities to be paid for known claims, and incurred but not reported claims as of the reporting date. We consider historical trends when determining the appropriate insurance reserves to record. In certain cases where partial insurance coverage exists, we must estimate the portion of the liability that will be covered by existing insurance policies to arrive at our net expected liability. Receivables for insurance recoveries for product liability claims are recorded as assets, on an undiscounted basis, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. These recoveries are estimated based on the contractual arrangements with vendors and other third parties as well as historical trends. We believe that our procedures for estimating such amounts are reasonable. See Note 6, “Commitments and Contingencies”, to the consolidated financial statements, Item 8 of Part II, included elsewhere in this report.

39

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 31, 2013

Contingencies

We are subject to contingencies, including legal proceedings and claims arising out of our business, that cover a wide range of matters including, among others, environmental matters, contract and employment claims, worker compensations claims, product liability, product recalls, warranty, and modification, adjustment or replacement of component parts of units sold. Product liability, environmental and other legal proceedings also include matters with respect to businesses previously owned.

We provide accruals for direct costs, including legal costs, associated with the estimated resolution of contingencies at the earliest date at which it is deemed probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of such liability can be reasonably estimated. Costs accrued have been estimated based upon an analysis of potential results, assuming a combination of litigation and settlement strategies and outcomes. Legal costs for other than probable contingencies are expensed when services are performed.

While it is impossible to ascertain the ultimate legal and financial liability with respect to contingent liabilities, including lawsuits, we believe that the aggregate amount of such liabilities, if any, in excess of amounts provided or covered by insurance, will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations. It is possible, however, that future results of operations for any particular future period could be materially affected by changes in our assumptions or strategies related to these contingencies, or changes out of our control. See Note 6, “Commitments and Contingencies”, to the consolidated financial statements, Item 8 of Part II, included elsewhere in this report.

Share-Based Compensation Expense

We measure share-based compensation expense at fair value in accordance with ASC 718, “Compensation - Stock Compensation” (“ASC 718”), and recognizes such expense over the vesting period of the share-based awards.

The estimated fair value of options granted is measured on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The risk-free interest rate for periods within the life of the option is based upon a blend of U.S. Treasury bond rates with maturities equal to the expected term of the options. Prior to December 2011, the expected term assumption was derived using a binomial model analysis. Commencing with grants made in December 2011, the expected term assumption was derived using the simplified method, as described in SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 14.D.2, "Share-Based Payment - Certain Assumptions Used in Valuation Methods". This change in estimation methodology did not have a material impact on the resulting estimated fair value of options granted. The expected volatility assumption is based upon the historical volatility of comparable public companies' stock as well as the implied volatility of outstanding options for the comparable companies that had such options. The dividend yield represents the expected dividends on the Company's common stock for the expected term of the option. To date, the expected dividend yield has been estimated at zero for all options measured.  A significant change in interest rates, stock volatility, or the Company's expected dividend rate would have a direct impact on the estimated fair value of options granted subsequent to such a change, and related expense. 

The estimated fair value of restricted stock granted is based upon the closing price of the Company's stock on the date of grant.   In addition to restricted stock awards with time based vesting, the Company has also granted performance based awards.  Expense related to restricted stock awards with performance based vesting conditions is recognized as it becomes probable that the restricted shares will vest.  Certain of these awards have multi-year cumulative performance targets.    Changes in estimate with respect to the probability of vesting could have a significant effect upon the amount of expense recognized in a given period.

See Note 12, “Share-Based Compensation”, to the consolidated financial statements, Item 8 Part II, included elsewhere in this report for further information regarding our share-based compensation programs.

40

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 31, 2013

Results of Operations

Our consolidated operating results for 2013, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

	For the year ended December 31,															Change
	2013					2012					2011					2013 vs. 2012					2012 vs. 2011
	Amount			% of Net Sales		Amount			% of Net Sales		Amount			% of Net Sales		Amount			2013 % - 2012 %		Amount			2012 % - 2011 %
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Net Sales	$	2,287.9		100.0	%	$	2,201.3		100.0	%	$	2,140.5		100.0	%	$	86.6		N/A %		$	60.8		N/A %
Cost of Products Sold ("COGS"):
Material costs	1,087.6			47.5		1,050.2			47.7		1,038.2			48.5		37.4			(0.2	)	12.0			(0.8	)
Labor costs	124.0			5.4		126.9			5.8		123.7			5.8		(2.9		)	(0.4	)	3.2			—
Overhead costs	415.8			18.2		383.8			17.4		405.9			18.9		32.0			0.8		(22.1		)	(1.5	)
Total COGS	1,627.4			71.1		1,560.9			70.9		1,567.8			73.2		66.5			0.2		(6.9		)	(2.3	)
Gross profit	660.5			28.9		640.4			29.1		572.7			26.8		20.1			(0.2	)	67.7			2.3
SG&A	521.3			22.8		468.5			21.3		464.8			21.8		52.8			1.5		3.7			(0.5	)
Amortization of intangible assets	51.3			2.3		44.3			2.0		44.8			2.1		7.0			0.3		(0.5		)	(0.1	)
Operating earnings	87.9			3.8		127.6			5.8		63.1			2.9		(39.7		)	(2.0	)	64.5			2.9
Interest expense	(99.4		)	(4.3	)	(96.5		)	(4.4	)	(105.6		)	(4.9	)	(2.9		)	0.1		9.1			0.5
Loss from debt retirement	—			—		(6.4		)	(0.3	)	(33.8		)	(1.6	)	6.4			0.3		27.4			1.3
Investment income	0.1			—		0.1			—		0.1			—		—			—		—			—
(Loss) earnings before (benefit) provision for income taxes	(11.4		)	(0.5	)	24.8			1.1		(76.2		)	(3.6	)	(36.2		)	(1.6	)	101.0			4.7
(Benefit) provision for income taxes	(3.1		)	(0.1	)	15.3			0.7		(20.3		)	(1.0	)	(18.4		)	(0.8	)	35.6			1.7
Net (loss) earnings	$	(8.3	)	(0.4	)%	$	9.5		0.4	%	$	(55.9	)	(2.6	)%	$	(17.8	)	(0.8	)%	$	65.4		3.0	%
Other financial information:
Depreciation and amortization	$	95.2		4.2	%	$	83.7		3.8	%	$	93.9		4.4	%	$	11.5		0.4	%	$	(10.2	)	(0.6	)%
Non-cash impairment charges	4.3			0.2		—			—		—			—		4.3			0.2		—			—
Share-based compensation expense	10.5			0.5		4.6			0.2		1.7			0.1		5.9			0.3		2.9			0.1
Restructuring and transformation charges	35.4			1.5		16.2			0.7		19.6			0.9		19.2			0.8		(3.4		)	(0.2	)
Other	7.9			0.3		2.5			0.1		10.7			0.5		5.4			0.2		(8.2		)	(0.4	)

* not meaningful or not applicable

41

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 31, 2013

Net sales by segment for 2013, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

							Change
	For the year ended December 31,						2013 vs. 2012					2012 vs. 2011
	2013		2012		2011		$			%		$			%
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
RESV	$	600.5	$	598.3	$	591.2	$	2.2		0.4	%	$	7.1		1.2	%
TECH	526.9		422.7		455.2		104.2			24.7		(32.5		)	(7.1	)
DMS	274.5		284.6		280.6		(10.1		)	(3.5	)	4.0			1.4
RHC	415.2		381.8		378.6		33.4			8.7		3.2			0.8
CES	470.8		513.9		434.9		(43.1		)	(8.4	)	79.0			18.2
	$	2,287.9	$	2,201.3	$	2,140.5	$	86.6		3.9	%	$	60.8		2.8	%

Operating earnings (loss) by segment for 2013, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

										Change
	For the year ended December 31,									2013 vs. 2012					2012 vs. 2011
	2013			2012			2011			$			%		$			%
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
RESV	$	63.1		$	73.3		$	32.6		$	(10.2	)	(13.9	)%	$	40.7		* %
TECH	7.6			14.2			35.4			(6.6		)	(46.5	)	(21.2		)	(59.9	)
DMS	38.2			33.1			22.2			5.1			15.4		10.9			49.1
RHC	13.1			8.5			1.4			4.6			54.1		7.1			*
CES	26.2			42.9			12.0			(16.7		)	(38.9	)	30.9			*
	148.2			172.0			103.6			(23.8		)	(13.8	)	68.4			66.0
Executive severance	—			—			(8.7		)	—			*		8.7			100.0
Unallocated	(60.3		)	(44.4		)	(31.8		)	(15.9		)	(35.8	)	(12.6		)	(39.6	)
	$	87.9		$	127.6		$	63.1		$	(39.7	)	(31.1	)%	$	64.5		* %

* not meaningful or not applicable

42

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 31, 2013

The remainder of this discussion provides greater detail of our operating results for each of our reporting segments. Our reporting segments offer a significant number of different products across a wide range of price points and numerous distribution channels that do not always allow meaningful quantitative analysis to be performed with respect to the effect on net sales of changes in units sold or the price per unit sold. However, whenever the underlying causes of material increases or decreases in consolidated net sales can be adequately analyzed and quantified, we attempt to make appropriate disclosure of such reasons, including changes in price, volume, and the mix of products sold. Overall, changes in COGS (including material, direct labor, overhead, and freight costs) as a percentage of net sales for one period as compared to another period may reflect a number of factors including changes in the relative mix of products sold, the effect of changes in sales prices and material costs, as well as changes in productivity levels.

We report our financial results in accordance with U.S. GAAP. However, we believe that certain non-GAAP performance measures used in managing the business may provide users of this financial information with additional meaningful comparisons between current results and results in prior periods. Non-GAAP performance measures should be viewed in addition to, and not as an alternative for, our reported results. We provide net sales and cost of products sold excluding the impact of foreign currency as a supplement to net sales and cost of products sold as determined by U.S. GAAP in order to provide readers with a clearer basis to assess our results over time. This measure is considered a non-GAAP financial measure and is calculated by translating the current period net sales and cost of products sold in functional currency to U.S. dollars using the prior year's exchange rate.

On March 11, 2013, our Board of Directors approved our operational improvement initiatives and efforts to rationalize our global manufacturing and distribution capacity. See "- Liquidity and Capital Resources - Operational Improvement Initiatives” below.

Year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2012

RESV Segment

The operating results for the RESV segment for 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

	For the year ended December 31,
	2013					2012					Change
	Amount			% of Net Sales		Amount			% of Net Sales		Amount			2013 % - 2012 %
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Net Sales	$	600.5		100.0	%	$	598.3		100.0	%	$	2.2		N/A %
COGS:
Material costs	250.4			41.7		252.2			42.1		(1.8		)	(0.4	)
Labor costs	31.1			5.2		33.4			5.6		(2.3		)	(0.4	)
Overhead costs	131.3			21.9		122.4			20.5		8.9			1.4
Total COGS	412.8			68.8		408.0			68.2		4.8			0.6
Gross Profit	187.7			31.2		190.3			31.8		(2.6		)	(0.6	)
SG&A	109.4			18.2		101.7			17.0		7.7			1.2
Amortization of intangible assets	15.2			2.5		15.3			2.5		(0.1		)	—
Operating earnings	$	63.1		10.5	%	$	73.3		12.3	%	$	(10.2	)	(1.8	)%
Other financial information:
Depreciation and amortization	$	27.4		4.6	%	$	29.0		4.8	%	$	(1.6	)	(0.2	)%
Non-cash impairment charge	4.3			0.7		—			—		4.3			0.7
Share-based compensation expense	1.1			0.2		0.3			0.1		0.8			0.1
Restructuring and transformation charges	(0.2		)	—		1.8			0.3		(2.0		)	(0.3	)
Other	—			—		(0.7		)	(0.1	)	0.7			0.1

43

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 31, 2013

Net sales in the RESV segment increased approximately $2.2 million in 2013 as compared to 2012 and reflects a decline of approximately $2.8 million due to the effects of changes in foreign exchange rates. Excluding the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates, net sales in the RESV segment for 2013 increased approximately $5.0 million as compared to 2012.

The increase in net sales for 2013 as compared to 2012 is primarily attributable to volume/mix increases, partially offset by the effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. North American sales in 2013 increased approximately $12.8 million, while sales in the segment's European range hood business declined approximately $11.0 million. Excluding the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates, North American sales in 2013 increased approximately $16.8 million, while sales in the segment's European range hood business declined approximately $12.1 million. The increase in North American sales for 2013 is attributable to increases in U.S. sales of approximately $22.8 million, partially offset by a decrease in Canadian sales of approximately $6.0 million. The increase in U.S. sales is primarily attributable to increases in the wholesale and appliance distribution channels of approximately $15.7 million, or 11.0%, and $8.8 million, or 16.3%, respectively. The decrease in Canadian sales is primarily attributable to softness in the retail distribution channel and a decline in Canadian housing starts. The decline in sales in the European range hood business is primarily attributable to the discontinuation of low margin business and the continued economic downturn in that region.

COGS as a percentage of net sales decreased slightly during 2013 as compared to 2012. Material costs as a percentage of net sales for 2013 decreased as compared to 2012, in part due to our global procurement initiative, a component of our overall operational improvement initiatives. Overhead and other costs increased in 2013 as compared to 2012 and primarily reflect an increase in product liability expense of approximately $9.0 million as compared to 2012 principally as a result of favorable claims settlement experienced during 2012. COGS for 2013 also includes (1) a non-cash impairment charge of approximately $4.3 million recorded during the fourth quarter of 2013 related to the write-down of property and equipment in connection with the exit in the first quarter of 2014 of a product line, (2) a decrease of approximately $1.3 million related to the effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates, and (3) a decrease of approximately $1.5 million related to depreciation expense. COGS for 2012 also includes approximately $1.8 million of severance and other charges related to exit and disposal activities.

The increase in SG&A as a percentage of net sales for 2013 is primarily attributable to an increase in net foreign exchange losses of approximately $1.5 million related to transactions, including intercompany debt not indefinitely invested in the Company's subsidiaries, increases in share-based compensation expense, and selling, marketing and product development expense, an increase in bad debt expense of approximately $2.0 million related to additional reserves recorded related to a foreign customer who declared bankruptcy during 2013, and a gain in 2012 related to a legal settlement of approximately $0.7 million with no comparable gain in 2013.

44

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 31, 2013

TECH Segment

The operating results for the TECH segment for 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

	For the year ended December 31,
	2013				2012				Change
	Amount		% of Net Sales		Amount		% of Net Sales		Amount			2013 % - 2012 %
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Net Sales	$	526.9	100.0	%	$	422.7	100.0	%	$	104.2		N/A %
COGS:
Material costs	275.1		52.2		215.5		51.0		59.6			1.2
Labor costs	6.1		1.2		4.7		1.1		1.4			0.1
Overhead costs	68.5		13.0		49.5		11.7		19.0			1.3
Total COGS	349.7		66.4		269.7		63.8		80.0			2.6
Gross Profit	177.2		33.6		153.0		36.2		24.2			(2.6	)
SG&A	152.7		29.0		128.6		30.4		24.1			(1.4	)
Amortization of intangible assets	16.9		3.2		10.2		2.4		6.7			0.8
Operating earnings	$	7.6	1.4	%	$	14.2	3.4	%	$	(6.6	)	(2.0	)%
Other financial information:
Depreciation and amortization	$	26.8	5.1	%	$	14.6	3.5	%	$	12.2		1.6	%
Share-based compensation expense	1.1		0.2		0.4		0.1		0.7			0.1
Restructuring and transformation charges	10.5		2.0		6.1		1.4		4.4			0.6
Other	3.6		0.7		2.7		0.6		0.9			0.1

During the second quarter of 2013, we acquired all of the outstanding common stock of 2GIG. Prior to the acquisition of 2GIG, 2GIG was a large security customer for the segment. The incremental sales associated with this acquisition, combined with the previously disclosed change in revenue recognition during the first quarter of 2013 contributed approximately $82.0 million to the increase in net sales during 2013. The acquisition of Gefen Distribution contributed approximately $6.1 million to the increase in net sales during 2013. Excluding the impact of 2GIG and Gefen Distribution as noted above, sales of security and access control products increased approximately $40.5 million for 2013, while sales of audio/video distribution products decreased approximately $24.4 million during 2013.

The impact of 2GIG and Gefen Distribution contributed approximately $50.9 million to COGS during 2013, of which approximately $3.1 million relates to increased cost of goods sold due to the recognition of inventory at the acquisition date fair value. As noted in the table above, COGS as a percentage of net sales increased in 2013 as compared to 2012. This increase was primarily as a result of an increase in material costs as a percentage of net sales and an increase in overhead costs as a percentage of net sales. The increase in material costs as a percentage of net sales is primarily attributable to a change in product mix, partially offset by improvements in material costs due in part to our global procurement initiative, a component of our overall operational improvement initiatives. The increase in overhead costs as a percentage of net sales is primarily as a result of the items noted below. COGS for 2013 also includes (1) a charge of approximately $3.4 million related to a product safety recall and other warranty matters, (2) restructuring and transformation costs of approximately $4.5 million, (3) a charge of approximately $2.0 million related to the discontinuation of certain products within the segment, and (4) an increase in depreciation expense of approximately $1.8 million. In addition, overhead costs as a percentage of net sales were further negatively impacted by lower production levels in the fourth quarter of 2013 due to the fixed nature of a large component of overhead, along with lower pricing during the quarter. COGS for 2012 includes a charge of approximately $3.7 million relating to the decision to discontinue development of a certain new product and approximately $2.4 million in severance and other charges relating to exit and disposal activities.

45

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 31, 2013

The impact of 2GIG and Gefen Distribution contributed approximately $17.9 million to SG&A during 2013. The decrease in SG&A as a percentage of net sales for 2013 is primarily the result of cost reductions associated with combining the operations of certain subsidiaries within the segment, as well as an increase in net sales without a proportionate increase in SG&A due to the fixed nature of certain expenses. SG&A for 2013 includes (1) an increase in product development costs of approximately $5.3 million, (2) an increase of approximately $2.3 million in severance and other charges related to exit and disposal activities and, (3) acquisition related costs of approximately $1.5 million.

Amortization of intangible assets increased in 2013 primarily as a result of the acquisition of 2GIG.

DMS Segment

The operating results for the DMS segment for 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

	For the year ended December 31,
	2013				2012				Change
	Amount		% of Net Sales		Amount		% of Net Sales		Amount			2013 % - 2012 %
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Net Sales	$	274.5	100.0	%	$	284.6	100.0	%	$	(10.1	)	N/A %
COGS:
Material costs	122.9		44.8		140.2		49.3		(17.3		)	(4.5	)
Labor costs	6.9		2.5		5.5		1.9		1.4			0.6
Overhead costs	31.4		11.4		33.3		11.7		(1.9		)	(0.3	)
Total COGS	161.2		58.7		179.0		62.9		(17.8		)	(4.2	)
Gross Profit	113.3		41.3		105.6		37.1		7.7			4.2
SG&A	62.2		22.7		60.4		21.2		1.8			1.5
Amortization of intangible assets	12.9		4.7		12.1		4.3		0.8			0.4
Operating earnings	$	38.2	13.9	%	$	33.1	11.6	%	$	5.1		2.3	%
Other financial information:
Depreciation and amortization	$	17.7	6.4	%	$	17.4	6.1	%	$	0.3		0.3	%
Share-based compensation expense	0.2		0.1		—		—		0.2			0.1
Restructuring and transformation charges	1.1		0.4		—		—		1.1			0.4
Other	2.1		0.8		—		—		2.1			0.8

Net sales in the DMS segment for 2013 decreased approximately $10.1 million from 2012. Sales to original equipment manufacturer ("OEM") customers contributed approximately $14.0 million to the decrease in net sales during 2013, while retail sales contributed approximately $8.5 million to the decrease in net sales. These decreases are primarily the result of the global decline in personal computer and television sales, as well as our strategic exit from low gross margin business. The decreases in OEM and retail sales were partially offset by increases in net sales for Ergotron branded products, primarily driven by ergonomic sit-stand and device management carts, of approximately $12.0 million.

COGS as a percentage of net sales decreased in 2013 as compared to 2012 primarily as a result of changes in the relative mix of products sold within the segment and a decrease in material costs associated with purchases of aluminum components, electrical components and steel.

46

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 31, 2013

SG&A includes a non-cash charge of approximately $2.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2013 related to the reversal of an indemnification asset initially recorded as part of purchase accounting. This was offset by the reversal of the related $2.1 million reserve for uncertain tax positions recorded as part of purchase accounting to the benefit from income taxes for 2013. The remaining increase in SG&A as a percentage of net sales for 2013 as compared to 2012 is primarily the result of a decrease in net sales without a proportionate decrease in SG&A due to the fixed nature of certain expenses and increased professional fees.

RHC Segment

The operating results for the RHC segment for 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

	For the year ended December 31,
	2013					2012				Change
	Amount			% of Net Sales		Amount		% of Net Sales		Amount			2013 % - 2012 %
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Net Sales	$	415.2		100.0	%	$	381.8	100.0	%	$	33.4		N/A %
COGS:
Material costs	244.6			58.9		230.7		60.4		13.9			(1.5	)
Labor costs	13.3			3.2		12.7		3.3		0.6			(0.1	)
Overhead costs	81.7			19.7		74.1		19.5		7.6			0.2
Total COGS	339.6			81.8		317.5		83.2		22.1			(1.4	)
Gross Profit	75.6			18.2		64.3		16.8		11.3			1.4
SG&A	61.7			14.9		55.0		14.4		6.7			0.5
Amortization of intangible assets	0.8			0.2		0.8		0.2		—			—
Operating earnings	$	13.1		3.1	%	$	8.5	2.2	%	$	4.6		0.9	%
Other financial information:
Depreciation and amortization	$	9.8		2.4	%	$	10.6	2.8	%	$	(0.8	)	(0.4	)%
Share-based compensation expense	0.7			0.2		0.2		0.1		0.5			0.1
Restructuring and transformation charges	8.6			2.1		0.3		0.1		8.3			2.0
Other	(0.1		)	—		0.4		0.1		(0.5		)	(0.1	)

The increase in net sales for 2013 is primarily the result of improving market conditions, continued increased private label sales to specific customers, ongoing efforts to attract new customers, and the addition of several new distribution customers as compared to 2012. Sales in North America increased approximately $37.0 million during 2013 as compared to 2012, while sales to customers in other regions decreased approximately $3.6 million in 2013 as compared to 2012.

The decrease in COGS as a percentage of net sales is primarily attributable to favorable pricing, lower outbound freight costs, lower material costs as a percentage of net sales (partly due to our global procurement initiative, a component of our overall operational improvement initiatives), and to a lesser extent favorable manufacturing overhead absorption. These decreases were partially offset by unfavorable sales mix. The year over year change in material costs as a percentage of net sales was adversely impacted by favorable LIFO adjustments in the prior year. Additionally, during 2013 the RHC segment recorded approximately $8.6 million of severance and other charges within COGS related to the planned manufacturing rationalization and relocation initiative discussed further in "- Liquidity and Capital Resources - Operational Improvement Initiatives".

The increase in SG&A in 2013 primarily relates to increased costs associated with strategic initiatives occurring within the segment, as well as, increased royalty fees.

47

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 31, 2013

CES Segment

The operating results for the CES segment for 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

	For the year ended December 31,
	2013				2012					Change
	Amount		% of Net Sales		Amount			% of Net Sales		Amount			2013 % - 2012 %
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Net Sales	$	470.8	100.0	%	$	513.9		100.0	%	$	(43.1	)	N/A %
COGS:
Material costs	194.6		41.3		211.6			41.2		(17.0		)	0.1
Labor costs	66.6		14.1		70.6			13.7		(4.0		)	0.4
Overhead costs	102.9		21.9		104.5			20.3		(1.6		)	1.6
Total COGS	364.1		77.3		386.7			75.2		(22.6		)	2.1
Gross Profit	106.7		22.7		127.2			24.8		(20.5		)	(2.1	)
SG&A	75.0		15.9		78.4			15.3		(3.4		)	0.6
Amortization of intangible assets	5.5		1.2		5.9			1.2		(0.4		)	—
Operating earnings	$	26.2	5.6	%	$	42.9		8.3	%	$	(16.7	)	(2.7	)%
Other financial information:
Depreciation and amortization	$	12.4	2.6	%	$	11.9		2.3	%	$	0.5		0.3	%
Share-based compensation expense	0.9		0.2		0.3			0.1		0.6			0.1
Restructuring and transformation charges	2.0		0.4		1.2			0.2		0.8			0.2
Other	0.1		—		(0.3		)	(0.1	)	0.4			0.1

Net sales in the CES segment for 2013 decreased approximately $43.1 million in 2013 as compared to 2012 and reflects a decrease of approximately $4.1 million attributable to the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates.  Excluding the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates, net sales in the CES segment for 2013 decreased approximately $39.0 million from 2012.  This decrease in net sales is primarily the result of decreased shipment levels of air handlers, clean room equipment and packaged equipment in the U.S. market.  Sales relating to a major customer decreased approximately $20.5 million during 2013 as compared to 2012. Backlog for CES products expected to be filled within the next twelve months was approximately $241.4 million at December 31, 2013 and approximately $213.4 million at December 31, 2012.  While there continues to be signs of continued weakness in non-residential construction, the increase in backlog since December 31, 2012 is the result of an increase in the incoming order rate, primarily related to one major customer.

The increase in COGS as a percentage of net sales for 2013 primarily reflects an increase in overhead costs as a percentage of net sales. This increase is primarily due to lower sales volume without a proportionate decrease in overhead due to the fixed nature of certain expenses. Overhead costs for 2013 also includes a charge of approximately $6.5 million related to certain warranty matters and a charge of approximately $0.9 million related to the planned manufacturing rationalization and relocation initiative discussed further in "- Liquidity and Capital Resources - Operational Improvement Initiatives". COGS in the CES segment for 2013 also reflects a decrease of approximately $3.6 million from 2012 attributable to the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates.

The increase in SG&A as a percentage of net sales for 2013 is primarily due to a decrease in net sales without a proportionate decrease in SG&A due to the fixed nature of certain expenses. SG&A for 2013 includes a decrease in bad debt expense of approximately $4.4 million related to customer recoveries and approximately $1.1 million in costs related to the planned manufacturing rationalization and relocation initiative discussed further in "- Liquidity and Capital Resources - Operational Improvement Initiatives".

48

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 31, 2013

Unallocated

Operating Loss. Unallocated operating loss was approximately $60.3 million in 2013 as compared to approximately $44.4 million for 2012. This increase in operating loss is primarily related to expanded executive staffing, higher share based compensation expense and higher outside consulting fees. Additionally, in 2013 we recorded a one-time compensation charge of approximately $1.7 million with no corresponding charge in 2012. Share based compensation expense for 2013 and 2012 totaled approximately $6.5 million and $3.4 million, respectively. Outside consulting fees and other costs relating to a program of operational improvement initiatives totaled approximately $13.4 million and $6.8 million for 2013 and 2012, respectively.

As described in "- Liquidity and Capital Resources" later in this section, we continue to identify and implement a number of initiatives intended to reduce costs and improve efficiencies, both in manufacturing and administrative areas, to improve our competitiveness and better align us with the markets we serve. In connection with these initiatives, we have added certain professionals and consultants with expertise in leading and implementing such initiatives. These initiatives, and the associated expenses, will continue throughout 2014 and beyond and the process of implementing certain of these initiatives, particularly with respect to relocating and rationalizing our manufacturing capacity, will continue at least into 2015. We view these initiatives as transformational and important to our ability to sustain a competitive advantage well into the future.

Interest Expense

Interest expense increased approximately $2.9 million, or approximately 3.0%, during 2013 as compared to 2012.  This increase is primarily the result of an increase in the weighted average interest rate of our outstanding debt.

Loss from Debt Retirement

On October 18, 2012, we issued an additional $235.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 8.5% Senior Notes due 2021 (the "New 8.5% Notes"). We received approximately $251.7 million of gross proceeds in connection with the issuance of the New 8.5% Notes, which were used to pay down an equal amount of aggregate principal of our Term Loan Facility. The redemption of the Term Loan Facility resulted in a pre-tax loss of approximately $6.4 million in the fourth quarter of 2012.

(Benefit) provision for Income Taxes

The benefit from income taxes for 2013 was approximately $3.1 million as compared to a provision for income taxes of approximately $15.3 million for 2012. The effective income tax rate of a benefit of approximately 27.2% for 2013 differs from the United States federal statutory rate of 35% principally as a result of losses in certain foreign jurisdictions that cannot be benefited, partially offset by the settlement of an uncertain tax position during the first quarter of 2013 and reductions in reserves for uncertain tax positions as a result of the expiration of the statute of limitations on certain items including a $2.1 million reserve reversal for uncertain tax positions recorded as part of purchase accounting. Compared to the United States federal statutory rate of 35%, the effective income tax rate of approximately 61.7% for 2012 reflects an increase in the valuation allowances related to certain deferred tax assets, state tax expense, and nondeductible expenses, partially offset by a decrease due to the effect of foreign operations.

Our cash tax liability for 2013 and 2012 was approximately $10.0 million and $10.4 million, respectively, of which approximately $8.0 million and $8.5 million, respectively, relates to income tax attributable to our foreign subsidiaries. At December 31, 2013, we had an estimated United States Federal income tax loss carryforward of approximately $23.4 million.

Foreign Net Sales and Operating Earnings

Net sales and earnings derived from international markets are subject to economic, political, and currency risks, among others.

Foreign net sales, which are attributed based on the location of our subsidiary responsible for the sale, were approximately 16.5% and 18.8% of consolidated net sales for 2013 and 2012, respectively.  Net sales from our Canadian subsidiaries were approximately 10.0% and 11.3% of consolidated net sales for 2013 and 2012, respectively.  Net sales from our Canadian subsidiaries include net sales from the RESV, TECH and CES segments.  Net sales from our European subsidiaries were approximately 6.2% and 6.9% of consolidated net sales for 2013 and 2012, respectively.  Net sales from our European subsidiaries include net sales from all segments, with the exception of our RHC segment.

49

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 31, 2013

Operating earnings of foreign operations, consisting primarily of the results of operations of our Canadian and European subsidiaries, were approximately 13.5% and 15.9% of consolidated operating earnings (before unallocated and corporate expenses) for 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Year ended December 31, 2012 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2011

RESV Segment

The operating results for the RESV segment for 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

	For the year ended December 31,
	2012					2011				Change
	Amount			% of Net Sales		Amount		% of Net Sales		Amount			2012 % - 2011 %
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Net Sales	$	598.3		100.0	%	$	591.2	100.0	%	$	7.1		N/A %
COGS:
Material costs	252.2			42.1		257.3		43.5		(5.1		)	(1.4	)
Labor costs	33.4			5.6		36.5		6.2		(3.1		)	(0.6	)
Overhead costs	122.4			20.5		140.6		23.8		(18.2		)	(3.3	)
Total COGS	408.0			68.2		434.4		73.5		(26.4		)	(5.3	)
Gross Profit	190.3			31.8		156.8		26.5		33.5			5.3
SG&A	101.7			17.0		108.9		18.4		(7.2		)	(1.4	)
Amortization of intangible assets	15.3			2.5		15.3		2.6		—			(0.1	)
Operating earnings	$	73.3		12.3	%	$	32.6	5.5	%	$	40.7		6.8	%
Other financial information:
Depreciation and amortization	$	29.0		4.8	%	$	28.9	4.9	%	$	0.1		(0.1	)%
Share-based compensation expense	0.3			0.1		0.1		—		0.2			0.1
Restructuring and transformation charges	1.8			0.3		16.9		2.9		(15.1		)	(2.6	)
Other	(0.7		)	(0.1	)	0.6		0.1		(1.3		)	(0.2	)

Net sales in the RESV segment for 2012 reflect an increase of approximately $7.1 million from 2011. This increase in net sales is primarily attributable to improved pricing, partially offset by volume/mix decreases and decreases related to the effects of foreign exchange rates of approximately $5.7 million. Excluding the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates, net sales in the RESV segment for 2012 increased approximately $12.8 million as compared to 2011. Excluding the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates, North American sales in 2012 increased approximately $23.8 million, while net sales for the segment's European range hood business declined approximately $12.7 million. The increase in North American sales is primarily attributable to increases in U.S. sales of approximately $22.3 million and Canadian sales of approximately $1.5 million. Price increases and industry wide increases in new housing starts, new and existing home sales, as well as residential construction and investment spending, during 2012 as compared to 2011, contributed to the overall increase in sales during the period. The decline in the European range hood business is primarily attributable to the discontinuation of low margin business.

The decrease in the percentage of COGS to net sales in 2012 primarily reflects a decrease in severance and other charges related to exit and disposal activities of approximately $12.9 million and a decrease in product liability expense of $9.4 million as compared to 2011. The impact of increased sales prices, the effect of changes in product mix and lower production costs also contributed to the decrease in COGS as a percentage of net sales during 2012. COGS for 2012 also includes a decrease of approximately $5.7 million related to the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates.

50

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 31, 2013

The decrease in SG&A as a percentage of net sales for 2012 is primarily attributable to cost reduction measures implemented at the RESV's European subsidiary serving the kitchen range hood market in conjunction with the Company's overall plan to reduce costs and improve production efficiencies at the subsidiary. SG&A for 2012 includes a decrease in net foreign exchange losses of approximately $3.5 million related to transactions, including intercompany debt not indefinitely invested in the Company's subsidiaries. During 2011, SG&A included a charge of approximately $2.2 million related to severance and other charges related to exit and disposal activities.

TECH Segment

The operating results for the TECH segment for 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

	For the year ended December 31,
	2012				2011				Change
	Amount		% of Net Sales		Amount		% of Net Sales		Amount			2012 % - 2011 %
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Net Sales	$	422.7	100.0	%	$	455.2	100.0	%	$	(32.5	)	N/A %
COGS:
Material costs	215.5		51.0		228.3		50.2		(12.8		)	0.8
Labor costs	4.7		1.1		3.8		0.8		0.9			0.3
Overhead costs	49.5		11.7		48.0		10.5		1.5			1.2
Total COGS	269.7		63.8		280.1		61.5		(10.4		)	2.3
Gross Profit	153.0		36.2		175.1		38.5		(22.1		)	(2.3	)
SG&A	128.6		30.4		129.8		28.5		(1.2		)	1.9
Amortization of intangible assets	10.2		2.4		9.9		2.2		0.3			0.2
Operating earnings	$	14.2	3.4	%	$	35.4	7.8	%	$	(21.2	)	(4.4	)%
Other financial information:
Depreciation and amortization	$	14.6	3.5	%	$	15.5	3.4	%	$	(0.9	)	0.1	%
Share-based compensation expense	0.4		0.1		—		—		0.4			0.1
Restructuring and transformation charges	6.1		1.4		1.2		0.3		4.9			1.1
Other	2.7		0.6		1.1		0.2		1.6			0.4

The decrease in net sales for 2012 is primarily attributable to lower volumes, including lower sales to 2GIG, a large security customer, of approximately $35.0 million, and a decrease in sales of approximately $4.8 million related to the closure of a certain subsidiary within the segment, partially offset by increased sales related to the impact of the TV One acquisition of approximately $6.1 million during 2012.

We combined the operations of certain subsidiaries within the segment in order to improve overall operational efficiencies, reduce costs, and provide potential for greater revenue growth.  In connection with the combination of these businesses, management identified certain products that were either redundant or not competitive and, therefore, were discontinued. Cost of goods sold in 2012 includes approximately $2.4 million to reduce inventory values for these products to their expected net realizable amounts. In addition, SG&A in 2012 includes approximately $3.7 million of severance and other exit costs in connection with the combinations. We anticipate recording additional expenses of between approximately $4.0 million and $5.0 million related to these activities.

COGS in 2012 includes a charge to overhead costs of approximately $3.7 million relating to the decision to discontinue development of a product. This decision was based on the less than expected interest in this product and the availability of competing products

51

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 31, 2013

within the TECH segment that are expected to have greater market potential. The charge is comprised of reserves to reduce remaining inventories to their net realizable value, costs to cancel open purchase orders, costs of products returned, and the accelerated depreciation of tooling equipment.

COGS for 2012 also includes the impact of the TV One acquisition of approximately $2.4 million and, for 2011, includes approximately $4.9 million of additional warranty expense primarily related to a certain security customer. As noted in the above table, the percentage of COGS to net sales increased for 2012, primarily as a result of an increase in material and overhead costs as a percentage of net sales. The increase in material costs as a percentage of net sales is mainly attributable to the mix of products sold. The increase in overhead costs primarily relates to the items discussed above, coupled with a decrease in net sales without a proportionate decrease in costs due to the fixed nature of certain overhead costs.

The increase in SG&A as a percentage of net sales for 2012 is primarily the result of the impact of the TV One acquisition of approximately $3.4 million, an increase in severance and other charges relating to exit and disposal activities of approximately $2.7 million, and approximately $2.9 million of increased spending levels for product development. These increases were partially offset by the result of cost reductions associated with combining the operations of certain subsidiaries within the segment, discussed earlier.

DMS Segment

The operating results for the DMS segment for 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

	For the year ended December 31,
	2012				2011				Change
	Amount		% of Net Sales		Amount		% of Net Sales		Amount			2012 % - 2011 %
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Net Sales	$	284.6	100.0	%	$	280.6	100.0	%	$	4.0		N/A %
COGS:
Material costs	140.2		49.3		134.5		47.9		5.7			1.4
Labor costs	5.5		1.9		5.3		1.9		0.2			—
Overhead costs	33.3		11.7		45.1		16.1		(11.8		)	(4.4	)
Total COGS	179.0		62.9		184.9		65.9		(5.9		)	(3.0	)
Gross Profit	105.6		37.1		95.7		34.1		9.9			3.0
SG&A	60.4		21.2		60.6		21.6		(0.2		)	(0.4	)
Amortization of intangible assets	12.1		4.3		12.9		4.6		(0.8		)	(0.3	)
Operating earnings	$	33.1	11.6	%	$	22.2	7.9	%	$	10.9		3.7	%
Other financial information:
Depreciation and amortization	$	17.4	6.1	%	$	24.2	8.6	%	$	(6.8	)	(2.5	)%

Net sales in the DMS segment increased approximately $4.0 million during 2012 as compared to 2011. This increase is attributable to increased sales volume of the segment's branded products primarily in the Americas and Asia Pacific regions, while European sales were relatively flat. In addition, direct sales to OEM customers were higher due to sales of new products and increased volume of existing products. These increases were partially offset by the planned withdrawal from low-margin OEM indirect business.

As noted in the above table, COGS as a percentage of net sales decreased in 2012 as compared to 2011. COGS for 2011 (specifically the first quarter of 2011) included an increase of approximately $7.3 million for inventory acquired in business combinations (which is included in depreciation and amortization expense) with no corresponding charge in 2012. The remaining change in COGS as

52

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 31, 2013

a percentage of net sales for 2012 is primarily due to an increase in material costs as a percentage of net sales due, in part, to changes in the relative mix of products sold.

The decrease in SG&A as a percentage of net sales is primarily the result of cost reductions related to synergies arising from the combination of two companies within this segment.

RHC Segment

The operating results for the RHC segment for 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

	For the year ended December 31,
	2012				2011				Change
	Amount		% of Net Sales		Amount		% of Net Sales		Amount			2012 % - 2011 %
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Net Sales	$	381.8	100.0	%	$	378.6	100.0	%	$	3.2		N/A %
COGS:
Material costs	230.7		60.4		232.3		61.4		(1.6		)	(1.0	)
Labor costs	12.7		3.3		13.0		3.4		(0.3		)	(0.1	)
Overhead costs	74.1		19.5		76.9		20.3		(2.8		)	(0.8	)
Total COGS	317.5		83.2		322.2		85.1		(4.7		)	(1.9	)
Gross Profit	64.3		16.8		56.4		14.9		7.9			1.9
SG&A	55.0		14.4		54.2		14.3		0.8			0.1
Amortization of intangible assets	0.8		0.2		0.8		0.2		—			—
Operating earnings	$	8.5	2.2	%	$	1.4	0.4	%	$	7.1		1.8	%
Other financial information:
Depreciation and amortization	$	10.6	2.8	%	$	12.8	3.4	%	$	(2.2	)	(0.6	)%
Share-based compensation expense	0.2		0.1		—		—		0.2			0.1
Restructuring and transformation charges	0.3		0.1		0.9		0.2		(0.6		)	(0.1	)
Other	0.4		0.1		0.1		—		0.3			0.1

The increase in net sales for 2012 is primarily the result of additional private label sales to a specific customer during 2012, the effect of increased sales prices effective June 15, 2011, introduction of new products, and the addition of several new distribution customers. These increases were offset somewhat by the impact of the mild winter weather experienced over much of the country during the first quarter of 2012, and an increase in first quarter 2011 sales to certain customers serving the residential site-built market for use as replacement products, among others.

The decrease in COGS as a percentage of net sales is primarily the result of a decrease in material costs as a percentage of net sales, primarily the result of engineered product cost reductions, lower prices related to the purchase of steel, copper, and aluminum, as well as increased sales prices. Overhead for 2012 includes a decrease of approximately $2.8 million of depreciation expense. The remaining decrease in overhead as a percentage of net sales is primarily the result of improved operational efficiencies and an increase in net sales without a proportionate increase in costs due to the fixed nature of certain overhead costs, partially offset by higher freight costs.

The increase in SG&A as a percentage of net sales for 2012 is primarily due to increases in product development spending and investments in strategic sales and marketing initiatives designed to drive sales through our independent distributors. These were

53

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 31, 2013

partially offset by a decrease in product liability expense of approximately $1.2 million as compared to 2011 as a result of favorable claims settlement during 2012.

CES Segment

The operating results for the CES segment for 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

	For the year ended December 31,
	2012					2011					Change
	Amount			% of Net Sales		Amount			% of Net Sales		Amount			2012 % - 2011 %
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Net Sales	$	513.9		100.0	%	$	434.9		100.0	%	$	79.0		N/A %
COGS:
Material costs	211.6			41.2		185.8			42.7		25.8			(1.5	)
Labor costs	70.6			13.7		65.1			15.0		5.5			(1.3	)
Overhead costs	104.5			20.3		95.3			21.9		9.2			(1.6	)
Total COGS	386.7			75.2		346.2			79.6		40.5			(4.4	)
Gross Profit	127.2			24.8		88.7			20.4		38.5			4.4
SG&A	78.4			15.3		70.8			16.3		7.6			(1.0	)
Amortization of intangible assets	5.9			1.2		5.9			1.3		—			(0.1	)
Operating earnings	$	42.9		8.3	%	$	12.0		2.8	%	$	30.9		5.5	%
Other financial information:
Depreciation and amortization	$	11.9		2.3	%	$	12.3		2.8	%	$	(0.4	)	(0.5	)%
Share-based compensation expense	0.3			0.1		—			—		0.3			0.1
Restructuring and transformation charges	1.2			0.2		0.6			0.1		0.6			0.1
Other	(0.3		)	(0.1	)	(0.2		)	—		(0.1		)	(0.1	)

Net sales in the CES segment for 2012 reflect a decrease of approximately $1.6 million attributable to the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates.  Excluding the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates, net sales in the CES segment for 2012 increased approximately $80.6 million.  This increase in net sales is primarily the result of increased shipment levels of air handlers, clean room equipment and packaged equipment in the U.S. market.  Backlog for CES products expected to be filled within the next twelve months was approximately $213.4 million at December 31, 2012 and approximately $260.0 million at December 31, 2011.  This decrease in backlog since December 31, 2011 is the result of the fulfillment of orders in process at the end of 2011 and was expected due to several large orders placed in 2011 that did not repeat in 2012, coupled with a slowdown in the incoming order rate reflecting a slower non-residential construction market since the beginning of the year.

The decrease in material costs as a percentage of net sales in 2012 is the result of changes in product mix, and lower costs relating to the purchase of steel, copper, and aluminum. This decrease in material costs partially offsets lower pricing in 2012. The decrease in labor costs as a percentage of net sales for 2012 primarily reflects improved efficiencies and a slight change in mix to higher margin products. The decrease in overhead as a percentage of net sales for 2012 is primarily due to higher sales volume without a proportionate increase in overhead, as well as product and process improvements made at several companies. COGS for 2012 also includes costs of approximately $1.2 million relating to the relocation of equipment to a new facility and a decrease of approximately $1.3 million related to the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates.

54

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 31, 2013

The decrease in SG&A as a percentage of net sales for 2012 is primarily due to an increase in net sales without a proportionate increase in SG&A due to the fixed nature of certain expenses and includes the effect of approximately $2.7 million in higher provision for bad debts in 2012.

Unallocated

Operating Loss. Unallocated operating loss was approximately $44.4 million in 2012 as compared to approximately $40.5 million for 2011. Unallocated operating loss for 2011 included approximately $8.7 million of severance expense related to the retirement of a Company executive.  Offsetting this decrease were increases primarily related to management compensation expense and expanded executive staffing, including non-cash equity based compensation expense associated with our improved financial results, and increased outside consulting fees relating to our operational initiatives which commenced in the second half of 2012.

Interest Expense

Interest expense decreased approximately $9.1 million, or approximately 8.6%, during 2012 as compared to 2011.  This decrease primarily reflects the impact of our debt refinancing transactions over the last two years as noted in the paragraphs below and the pay down of our ABL Facility.

Loss from Debt Retirement

As noted previously, on October 18, 2012, we issued $235.0 million aggregate principal amount of the “New 8.5% Notes” at an issue price of 107.125% of principal, plus accrued interest from October 15, 2012. The New 8.5% Notes were offered as additional notes under the indenture pursuant to which we previously issued $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Original 8.5% Notes. We received approximately $251.7 million of gross proceeds in connection with the issuance of the New 8.5% Notes, which were used to pay down an equal amount of aggregate principal of our Term Loan Facility. We used cash on hand to pay accrued interest of approximately $1.8 million related to the Term Loan Facility and to pay underwriting, legal, and accounting fees of approximately $4.7 million related to the issuance of the New 8.5% Notes. The redemption of the Term Loan Facility resulted in a pre-tax loss of approximately $6.4 million in the fourth quarter of 2012.

On April 26, 2011, we issued our Original 8.5% Notes in an aggregate principal amount of $500.0 million and entered into the Term Loan Facility. We received approximately $848.2 million of gross proceeds in connection with the issuance of the Original 8.5% Notes and Term Loan Facility. We used approximately $825.0 million of these net proceeds to repurchase or redeem all of the 11% Senior Secured Notes due 2013 (the "11% Notes"), which included approximately $753.3 million of aggregate outstanding principal balance, approximately $37.8 million of tender and redemption premiums and approximately $33.9 million of accrued but unpaid interest. The redemption of the 11% Notes resulted in a pre-tax loss of approximately $33.8 million in the second quarter of 2011.

55

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 31, 2013

Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes for 2012 was approximately $15.3 million as compared to a benefit from income taxes of approximately $20.3 million for 2011. Compared to the United States federal statutory rate of 35%, the effective income tax rate of approximately 61.7% for 2012 reflects an increase in the valuation allowances related to certain deferred tax assets, state tax expense, and nondeductible expenses, partially offset by a decrease due to the effect of foreign operations. The effective income tax rate of a benefit of approximately 26.6% for 2011 differs from the United States federal statutory rate of a benefit of 35% principally as a result of an increase in the valuation allowance related to certain current year tax losses and the effect of foreign activities, partially offset by changes in the state income tax benefit, net of federal income tax effect.

We have U.S. federal and state net operating loss carryforwards that offset substantially all of our domestic taxable income. As a result, our expected cash tax liability is substantially less than our financial statement tax expense. The tax liability for 2012 and 2011 was approximately $10.4 million and $10.5 million, respectively, of which approximately $8.5 million and $8.6 million, respectively, relates to income tax attributable to our foreign subsidiaries. At December 31, 2012, we had an estimated U.S. Federal income tax loss carryforward of approximately $26.0 million.

Foreign Net Sales and Operating Earnings

Net sales and earnings derived from international markets are subject to economic, political, and currency risks, among others.

Foreign net sales, which are attributed based on the location of our subsidiary responsible for the sale, were approximately 18.8% and 19.7% of consolidated net sales for 2012 and 2011, respectively.  Net sales from our Canadian subsidiaries were approximately 11.3% and 10.7% of consolidated net sales for 2012 and 2011, respectively.  Net sales from our Canadian subsidiaries include net sales from the RESV, TECH and CES segments.  Net sales from our European subsidiaries were approximately 6.9% and 7.6% of consolidated net sales for 2012 and 2011, respectively.  Net sales from our European subsidiaries include net sales from all segments, with the exception of our RHC segment.

Operating earnings of foreign operations, consisting primarily of the results of operations of our Canadian and European subsidiaries, were approximately 15.9% and 3.4% of consolidated operating earnings (before unallocated and corporate expenses) for 2012 and 2011, respectively.

56

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 31, 2013

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our primary liquidity needs are to fund general business requirements, including working capital requirements, capital expenditures, interest payments, and debt repayments. Our principal sources of liquidity are cash flows from operations, existing unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, and the use of borrowings under our $300.0 million ABL Facility. The indentures related to our 10% Notes and 8.5% Notes, the credit agreements governing our ABL Facility and Term Loan Facility, and other agreements governing our indebtedness and the indebtedness of our subsidiaries contain certain restrictive financial and operating covenants, including covenants that restrict our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to complete acquisitions, pay dividends or make other payments or distributions, incur additional indebtedness, make loans or investments, incur certain liens, enter into transactions with affiliates, consolidate, merge or sell assets, and take certain other corporate actions. See Note 4, "Notes, Mortgage Notes and Obligations Payable" to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report and “- Debt Covenant Compliance” below.

We believe that our unrestricted cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2013, our estimated cash flows from our subsidiaries, and borrowings available under our ABL Facility will be sufficient to fund our operations, anticipated capital expenditures, including potential acquisitions, and debt repayment obligations through at least the next twelve months based on our current operating plan.

We believe that our primary long-term capital requirements relate to servicing and repaying our indebtedness. At December 31, 2013, we had outstanding $250.0 million in aggregate principal amount of the 10% Notes, $735.0 million in aggregate principal amount of the 8.5% Notes (excluding approximately $6.3 million of unamortized debt premium), $93.0 million in aggregate principal amount outstanding under the Term Loan Facility (excluding approximately $1.3 million of unamortized debt discount), and no outstanding borrowings under the ABL Facility. In addition, we are currently obligated to make periodic interest payments under the 8.5% Notes, the 10% Notes, the Term Loan Facility and the ABL Facility, as well as make periodic interest and principal payments relating to other indebtedness of our subsidiaries. See “-Contractual Obligations” below for detail on our payment obligations under our indebtedness.

Our ability to make payments on our indebtedness and to fund planned capital expenditures will depend on our ability to generate cash in the future. Our ability to generate cash in the future will be dependent upon, among other things, the performance of our operating segments, and general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control.

Our ability to repay our outstanding indebtedness will also depend on our ability to access the capital markets in order to refinance all amounts outstanding under the 10% Notes, the 8.5% Notes, the ABL Facility and the Term Loan Facility, as we do not anticipate generating sufficient cash flow from operations to repay such amounts in full. There can be no assurance that funds will be available to us in the capital markets, together with cash generated from operations, in an amount sufficient to enable us to pay our indebtedness or to fund our other liquidity needs. Additionally, there can be no assurance that we will be able to refinance any of our indebtedness, including the 10% Notes, the 8.5% Notes, the ABL Facility and the Term Loan Facility, on commercially reasonable terms or at all. If we cannot service our indebtedness, we may have to take actions such as selling assets, seeking additional equity or reducing or delaying capital expenditures, strategic acquisitions, investments and alliances. There can be no assurance that any such actions, if necessary, could be effected on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

Operational Improvement Initiatives

In the first half of 2012, we began operational improvement initiatives designed to generate significant improvements in efficiencies and reductions in operating costs and expenses, both in our manufacturing processes and in our administrative functions, in order to better align us with the markets we serve and improve our overall competitiveness. These initiatives remained in progress throughout 2013, and we expect will remain in process well into 2015.

In addition to efficiencies and cost reductions, we expect that these initiatives will allow us to focus greater effort and resources on product development, marketing and sales, and customer service. Management considers these initiatives to be important to our ability to maintain and improve our position in many of our markets and to allow us to expand in certain other markets. These initiatives address a wide variety of key areas of operations, including, for example, (i) optimizing the number and location of manufacturing, warehousing and distribution facilities, (ii) optimizing our procurement sources and processes, (iii) determining the potential for leveraging administrative resources across various operating groups, (iv) combining and/or relocating individual operations to leverage common management, (v) implementing global information systems to facilitate communication and

57

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 31, 2013

resource sharing in areas such as finance and human resources and (vi) introducing new products and expanding our presence in certain markets.

Given the wide ranging impact of these initiatives, we have made or plan to continue to make significant incremental investments in staffing, research and development projects and specialized consulting resources. For example, in 2012 and 2013, we expanded our staff with senior individuals with expertise in pertinent, impacted operational areas such as information technology, human resources and supply chain management.  We have also engaged certain additional, third party resources with specialization in the areas of manufacturing rationalization, procurement, logistics, information technology and process optimization. The cost of these investments in external resources in 2013 approximated $10.4 million, and is expected to range from approximately $5.0 million to $8.0 million in 2014.

Manufacturing Capacity and Distribution Rationalization: Rationalization of our global manufacturing and distribution capacity remains an important objective of the operational improvement initiatives. Currently, our manufacturing locations are primarily located throughout North America, Europe and China. We believe that consolidation and relocation of parts of our manufacturing operations to lower cost regions will provide significant cost reduction opportunities which are important to our future competitiveness. With the assistance of third party consultants who have expertise in this area, we have reviewed our worldwide manufacturing footprint to identify the extent of such opportunities given the products and markets that comprise our business. In considering potential alternatives, we considered, among other things, the availability and cost of skilled labor, proximity to supply sources, customers and similar logistical concerns, and regulatory environments and level of support provided by local governments.

On March 11, 2013, in connection with the implementation of these new operational improvement initiatives and, in particular, our efforts to rationalize our global manufacturing capacity, our Board of Directors approved the following initiatives: (i) construction of two new manufacturing facilities on a campus in Mexico to be shared by our RHC and CES segments, which will provide an integrated manufacturing footprint for both RHC and CES; (ii) consolidation of two North American manufacturing facilities in the RHC segment into the new, shared facility in Mexico; and (iii) transfer of product manufacturing from certain manufacturing facilities in the CES segment to the new, shared campus in Mexico, as well as transferring and expanding parts and sub-assembly operations in Mexico. Construction of these facilities began in the first quarter of 2013 and was substantially completed by the end of January 2014. Manufacturing in these locations began in the first quarter of 2014 and will continue to ramp up throughout the year as we continue to transfer product lines from the impacted North American locations to the new manufacturing campus. We expect that the total remaining cost to complete these manufacturing relocation projects will approximate $24.5 million to $29.5 million. We expect cash expenditures to continue through fiscal year 2015. The total remaining cost of these manufacturing relocation projects, substantially all of which will result in cash expenditures, will be primarily comprised of approximately $7.0 million to $8.5 million of machinery and equipment relocation and installation costs (including approximately $1.0 million to $1.5 million of capital expenditures), approximately $5.5 million to $6.5 million of costs associated with duplicate overhead and inefficiencies during the relocation period, approximately $9.0 million to $10.0 million of employee-related costs, and approximately $3.0 million to $4.5 million of other associated costs, including approximately $1.0 million to $2.0 million of on-going higher inventory levels. In addition, in order to assure that product availability is not disrupted and that there is no deterioration in customer service levels, we increased our inventory levels at December 31, 2013 by approximately $15.0 million and we expect that inventory levels will continue to remain at that elevated level during the transition period. Further, our Board of Directors approved restructuring expenditures of $15.0 million related to potential future footprint rationalization strategies. No significant amounts have been spent or committed in respect to this authorization to date.

One of the central factors needed to achieve our long term goals of creating a cost advantaged, scalable network that supports growth and innovation is to position our manufacturing operations where we can cost competitively manufacture product, as well as enhance our competitive capability with the ability to grow certain product lines and expand into new markets. We believe that consolidation and relocation of portions of our manufacturing capacity for the RHC and CES segments to Mexico will provide significant cost reduction opportunities. We expect these manufacturing relocation projects to generate cost savings as a result of reduced labor costs available in Mexico and from the leveraging of fixed overhead that will result from consolidating facilities. Our primary objective with respect to these initiatives is an improved competitive cost structure that will enable us to drive growth and profitability.

On March 11, 2013, in connection with our efforts to optimize supply chain performance, our Board of Directors also approved entry into a five-year agreement with a third party logistics service provider to outsource certain warehousing and distribution activities in our North American operating segments and facilitate the consolidation of North American warehousing distribution

58

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 31, 2013

centers. We expect that the remaining costs to be incurred in connection with this process of outsourcing and consolidation to be approximately $2.0 million to $3.0 million. This cost, substantially all of which will result in cash expenditures, is primarily comprised of approximately $0.5 million to $1.0 million of lease cancellation costs and approximately $1.5 million to $2.0 million of other associated costs. We expect these initiatives to generate cost savings as a result of moving to shared distribution centers and leveraging our scale by optimizing our shipments and consolidating our facilities.

We expect that of the remaining cost of approximately $26.5 million to $32.5 million related to the manufacturing relocation and warehousing and distribution consolidation initiatives, approximately $21.0 million to $23.0 million in restructuring expense will be incurred in 2014 with the remainder being incurred in 2015 and 2016.

Each of these manufacturing relocation projects and warehousing and distribution outsourcing and consolidation initiatives is aimed at optimizing our global manufacturing footprint and logistical structure to ensure that capacity is located in areas where customer service can be maximized.

The following table outlines amounts recorded within the consolidated statement of operations associated with our operational improvement initiatives for the year ended December 31, 2013:

	SG&A		COGS		Total
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Manufacturing Rationalization & Relocation Initiative	$	0.3	$	9.2	$	9.5
Warehousing & Distribution Consolidation	0.5		3.5		4.0
Total	$	0.8	$	12.7	$	13.5

Procurement and Sourcing: We believe that we have a significant opportunity to reduce our manufacturing material cost, as well as our indirect non-manufacturing costs, by optimizing our procurement sources and processes. In 2013, we began the process of consolidating supplier sources and negotiating terms and pricing in a uniform and centralized manner. As a result of this initiative, we have begun to experience more competitive costs and services from our suppliers, and we expect this favorable trend will continue in 2014 and beyond.

Leveraging Resources and Sharing Systems: We believe implementing common information system platforms in certain areas and combining administrative functions when appropriate will allow us to improve efficiency and service levels and also reduce costs. An example of such an area is Human Resources. With a total workforce of approximately 9,600 on 5 continents, we believe a common Human Resource information platform will, among other things, allow us to synchronize human resource processes and policies, improve the management of compensation levels, improve utilization of specialized resources, share resources among different organizations, and provide greater opportunities for our worldwide workforce to grow and develop within the overall Nortek organization. In 2013, we implemented a common human resource information system platform among two of our five segments, as well as at our headquarters, and we expect to complete the implementation process in 2014.

Although they are well underway, these are long-term initiatives which we expect will be in process through the end of 2015. While it is still relatively early in the lifecycle of these projects, preliminary indications are that the annualized savings, compared to current cost levels and commodity markets, will approximate $45.0 million to $55.0 million when all of the projects have been completed. The savings will be generated in many areas of our business, including lower material and conversion costs, lower warehousing and distribution costs and lower administrative costs. While we estimated that we have saved approximately $7.0 million to $9.0 million in 2013, primarily through lower material and indirect costs, and we anticipate additional savings of approximately $15.0 million to $20.0 million to be realized in 2014, we do not anticipate full run rate savings to be realized until all of the projects have been successfully concluded, toward the end of 2015. These remain preliminary estimates of the savings that could be generated from our operational improvement initiatives, and there can be no assurance that these savings will be realized in the range expected, or at all.

59

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 31, 2013

Cash Flows

Our cash flows from operating, investing, and financing activities for 2013 and 2012, as reflected in the consolidated statements of cash flows included elsewhere herein, are summarized in the table below:

	2013			2012			Change
	(Dollar Amounts in millions)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	135.2		$	164.2		$	(29.0	)
Net cash used in investing activities	(193.3		)	(23.5		)	(169.8		)
Net cash used in financing activities	(5.7		)	(54.2		)	48.5
Net change in unrestricted cash and cash equivalents	$	(63.8	)	$	86.5		$	(150.3	)

The decrease in net cash provided by operating activities was the result of a decrease in net earnings (after the exclusion of non-cash items) of approximately $16.7 million combined with an increase in working capital needs of approximately $15.2 million partially offset by an increase in changes in other long-term assets and liabilities of approximately $2.9 million.

The increase in net cash used in investing activities was primarily the result of an increase in net cash paid for businesses acquired of approximately $143.8 million, an increase in capital expenditures of approximately $19.7 million, a decrease in proceeds from the sale of property and equipment of approximately $2.8 million, and an increase in restricted cash and marketable securities of approximately $2.6 million. Capital expenditures were approximately $43.8 million and $24.1 million for 2013 and 2012, respectively.  Capital expenditures are expected to be between approximately $45 million and $50 million in 2014, excluding expenditures associated with the operational initiatives discussed previously.

The decrease in net cash used in financing activities is primarily the result of an increase in proceeds from borrowings of approximately $118.5 million partly in connection with our acquisition of 2GIG, partially offset by an increase in payments relating to outstanding borrowings of approximately $72.0 million.

As discussed earlier, we generally use cash flows from operations and, where necessary, borrowings to finance our capital expenditures and strategic acquisitions, to meet the service requirements of existing indebtedness, and for working capital and other general corporate purposes.

Outstanding Indebtedness

We had consolidated debt at December 31, 2013 of approximately $1,096.8 million consisting of the following:

	(Amounts in millions)
8.5% Notes, net of premium	$	741.3
10% Notes	250.0
Term Loan Facility, net of discount	91.7
ABL Facility	—
Long-term notes, mortgage notes and other indebtedness, net	13.1
Short-term bank obligations	0.7
	$	1,096.8

During 2013, we had a net decrease in our debt of approximately $4.2 million resulting from net payments relating to subsidiary debt of approximately $2.9 million and a decrease of approximately $1.3 million relating to the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates, debt premium accretion, and debt discount amortization. Our debt to equity ratio decreased from approximately

60

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 31, 2013

11.7:1 at December 31, 2012 to approximately 11.0:1 at December 31, 2013 primarily as a result of the net decrease in indebtedness as noted above and an increase in equity.

Contractual Obligations

The following is a summary of our estimated future cash obligations at December 31, 2013, including those of our subsidiaries, under debt obligations (excluding approximately $4.5 million in net unamortized debt premium), interest expense (based upon interest rates in effect at the time of the preparation of this summary), capital lease obligations, minimum annual rental obligations primarily for non-cancelable lease obligations (operating leases), acquisition agreements, purchase obligations, other long-term liabilities and other obligations. Also, see Note 4, “Notes, Mortgage Notes and Obligations Payable”, and Note 6, “Commitments and Contingencies”, to the consolidated financial statements, Item 8 of Part II, included elsewhere in this report:

	Payments Due by Period
	Less than 1 year		2 - 3 Years		4 - 5 Years		More than 5 Years		Total
	(Amounts in millions)
Notes, mortgage notes and obligations payable (1)	$	0.3	$	0.6	$	343.6	$	739.9	$	1,084.4
Interest payments (2) (3) (4)	96.3		192.6		177.8		144.5		611.2
Capital lease obligations	2.8		3.3		1.1		—		7.2
Operating lease obligations	20.1		23.9		12.9		9.8		66.7
Other purchase obligations	6.9		—		—		—		6.9
Other liabilities (5) (6)	7.0		10.7		4.2		6.1		28.0
Total (7)	$	133.4	$	231.1	$	539.6	$	900.3	$	1,804.4

(1) Excludes short term bank obligations of approximately $0.7 million.

(2) Based upon interest rates in effect at December 31, 2013.

(3) Subsidiary debt used for working capital purposes such as lines of credit are estimated to continue through June 2020 in the above table.

(4) Includes estimated interest payments on the ABL Facility which are estimated to continue through June 2017 in the above table.

(5) Includes expected contributions to our defined benefit pension plan in 2014 of approximately $7.0 million. This table does not include the long-term contractual obligations associated with our defined benefit and other post-retirement benefit plans at December 31, 2013. See Note 13, “Pension, Profit Sharing and Other Post-Retirement Benefits”, to the consolidated financial statements, Item 8 of Part II, included elsewhere in this report.

(6) Other long-term liabilities, such as unrecognized tax benefits, product liability and warranty reserves, have been excluded from the table due to the uncertainty of the timing, and amount, of payments.

(7) Does not include anticipated annual payments related to the Mexico facilities as discussed below.

During 2013, we recorded a non-cash addition to buildings within property and equipment and other long-term liabilities of approximately $33.6 million related to construction in progress of new facilities in Mexico. Under the terms of the agreements, we are considered to be the owner of the asset during the construction period in accordance with the provisions of ASC 840, Leases, with respect to such transactions. We anticipate that upon completion of the facilities, we will incur annual payments of approximately $3.1 million under the agreements for a period of ten years.

Nortek, its subsidiaries, affiliates, or significant shareholders (subject to the Investor Agreement between the Company and Ares Management LLC, dated as of April 4, 2012, as described in the Form 8-K filed by the Company with the SEC on April 5, 2012) may from time to time, in their sole discretion, purchase, repay, refinance, redeem or retire any of our outstanding debt, in privately negotiated or open market transactions, by tender offer or otherwise, which may be subject to restricted payment limitations.

61

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 31, 2013

Adequacy of Liquidity Sources

At December 31, 2013, we had approximately $80.9 million of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, of which approximately $37.7 million was held by foreign subsidiaries, to fund our cash needs for 2014.  At December 31, 2013, the Company has not provided United States income taxes or foreign withholding taxes on unremitted foreign earnings of approximately $45.0 million, as those amounts are considered indefinitely invested. If these unremitted foreign earnings are needed for U.S. operations and can no longer be permanently indefinitely invested outside the United States, we would be required to accrue and pay U.S. taxes on the earnings associated with these funds.

During 2014, we expect that it is reasonably likely that the following major cash requirements will occur as compared to 2013: 

	For the Year Ended December 31,
	2014 (1) (2)		2013
	(Amounts in millions)
Interest payments, net	$	96.3	$	97.3
Principal payments, net	0.3		153.4
Capital lease obligations	2.8		2.6
Completed acquisitions	—		146.4
Capital expenditures	45.0		43.8
Operating lease and other rental payments	26.0		32.7
Defined benefit pension plan and other post-retirement benefit plan contributions	7.0		3.2

(1) The cash requirements for 2014 do not include cash outlays relating to exit and disposal activities or operational improvement initiatives. See Note 5, "Exit & Disposal Activities", tothe consolidated financial statements, Item 8 of Part II, included elsewhere in this report.

(2) The table above does not reflect anticipated annual payments of approximately $3.1 million related to the Mexico facilities discussed above.

In addition, cash requirements for income tax payments will be dependent on our level of earnings. In 2013, we had income tax payments, net of refunds of approximately $12.2 million. At December 31, 2013, we had an estimated U.S. Federal income tax loss carryforward of approximately $7.0 million.

Our ABL Facility consists of a $280.0 million U.S. facility (with a $60.0 million sublimit for the issuance of U.S. standby letters of credit and a $20.0 million sublimit for U.S. swingline loans) and a $20.0 million Canadian facility.  As of March 7, 2014, we had approximately $5.0 million in outstanding borrowings (excluding approximately $30.0 million borrowed on March 11, 2014) and approximately $13.0 million in outstanding letters of credit under the ABL Facility. Based on the January 2014 borrowing base calculations, at March 7, 2014, we had excess availability of approximately $237.2 million under the ABL Facility and approximately $205.3 million of excess availability before triggering the cash deposit requirements as discussed further below.

As noted previously, the indentures and other agreements governing our indebtedness and the indebtedness of our subsidiaries contain certain restrictive financial and operating covenants, including covenants that restrict our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to complete acquisitions, pay dividends, incur indebtedness, make investments, sell assets, and take certain other corporate actions.  As of December 31, 2013, we had the capacity to make certain payments, including dividends, under the 10% Notes of approximately $55.9 million.

From time to time, we have evaluated and expect to continue to evaluate possible acquisition transactions and possible dispositions of certain of our businesses and at any given time may be engaged in discussions or negotiations with respect to possible acquisitions or dispositions.

On February 22, 2013, we acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of Gefen Distribution for total consideration of approximately $2.9 million, consisting of cash payments of approximately $0.9 million, a holdback amount of approximately $0.2 million to be paid 18 months subsequent to the closing of the acquisition, and the settlement of a receivable due from Gefen Distribution to the Company as of the acquisition date of approximately $1.8 million.

62

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 31, 2013

On April 1, 2013, we acquired all of the outstanding common stock of 2GIG from APX Group, Inc. The purchase price was approximately $164.2 million, which consisted of a cash payment at the date of acquisition of approximately $135.0 million, working capital adjustments of approximately $13.9 million (of which approximately $12.3 million and $1.6 million was paid during the second and third quarter of 2013, respectively) and the settlement of a receivable due from 2GIG to us as of the acquisition date of approximately $15.3 million.

Working Capital

Our working capital and current ratio decreased from approximately $348.0 million and 1.9:1, respectively, at December 31, 2012 to approximately $250.3 million and 1.6:1, respectively, at December 31, 2013.  This decrease is primarily the result of the net effect of the changes described further below.

Refer to “- Cash Flows”, “- Contractual Obligations” and “- Adequacy of Liquidity Sources” above for further discussions on the Company’s working capital and future uses of cash.

Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents decreased from approximately $144.7 million at December 31, 2012 to approximately $80.9 million at December 31, 2013.

Accounts receivable, less allowances, increased approximately $19.0 million, or approximately 7.4%, between December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2013, while net sales increased approximately $43.5 million, or approximately 8.6%, in the fourth quarter of 2013 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2012. The rate of change in accounts receivable in certain periods may be different than the rate of change in sales in such periods principally due to the timing of net sales, the level of sales recognized on a cash basis, as well as collections from our customers.  Increases or decreases in net sales near the end of any period generally result in significant changes in the amount of accounts receivable on the date of the balance sheet at the end of such period.  Accounts receivable from customers related to foreign operations decreased by approximately $9.1 million, or approximately 14.1%, between December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2013.  

Inventories increased approximately $12.1 million, or approximately 4.7%, between December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2013. The change in inventories is primarily related to an increase in the RHC segment due to inventory build-up associated with the Manufacturing Rationalization and Relocation Initiative discussed earlier, partially offset by a decrease in the RESV segment due to continuing initiatives within the segment to reduce inventory levels.

Accounts payable increased approximately $40.3 million, or 23.1%, between December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2013. The increase primarily relates to increases in the DMS and CES segments due to increased purchases. 

Accrued expenses and taxes, net increased approximately $32.6 million, or approximately 16.4%, between December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2013 as a result of an increase in customer deposits, warranty reserves, and severance related to certain exit activities and net changes in various other compensation related and other accruals.

Changes in certain working capital accounts, as noted above, between December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2013, differ from the changes reflected in our consolidated statements of cash flows for such period as a result of non-cash items including, among others, the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates.

63

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 31, 2013

Debt Covenant Compliance

The agreements that govern the terms of our outstanding debt, including the indentures that govern the 10% Notes and the 8.5% Notes, and the credit agreements that govern the ABL Facility and Term Loan Facility, contain covenants that restrict our ability and the ability of certain of our subsidiaries to, among other things:

• consolidate, merge or sell assets;

• pay dividends or make other payments or distributions;

• incur additional indebtedness;

• make loans, investments, or acquisitions;

• incur certain liens; and

• enter into transactions with affiliates.

Additionally, pursuant to the terms of the ABL Facility, we will be required to deposit cash from our material deposit accounts (including all concentration accounts) daily in collection accounts maintained with the administrative agent under the ABL Facility, which will be used to repay outstanding loans and cash collateralized letters of credit, if (i) excess availability (as defined in the ABL Facility) falls below the greater of $30.0 million or 12.5% of the borrowing base or (ii) an event of default has occurred and is continuing. In addition, under the ABL Facility, if (i) excess availability falls below the greater of $30.0 million or 12.5% of the borrowing base or (ii) an event of default has occurred and is continuing, we will be required to satisfy and maintain a consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio measured on a trailing four quarter basis of not less than 1.0 to 1.0. The ABL Facility and the Term Loan Facility also restrict our ability to prepay our other indebtedness, including the 10% Notes, the 8.5% Notes and, with respect to the ABL Facility, the Term Loan Facility, or designate any other indebtedness as senior debt.

In addition, the indentures that govern our 10% Notes and 8.5% Notes and the credit agreement that governs the Term Loan Facility contain certain covenants that limit our ability to designate any of our subsidiaries as unrestricted subsidiaries or permit any restricted subsidiaries that are not guarantors under the indenture from guaranteeing our debt or the debt of any of our other restricted subsidiaries. The indentures governing our 10% Notes and 8.5% Notes and the credit agreement that governs the Term Loan Facility also restrict our ability to incur certain additional indebtedness (but does not restrict our ability to incur indebtedness under the ABL Facility or certain other forms of permitted debt) if the fixed charge coverage ratio (“FCCR”) measured on a trailing four quarter basis falls below 2.0 to 1.0. The FCCR is the ratio of Adjusted Consolidated Cash Flow, (“ACCF”, as described in greater detail below) to Fixed Charges (as defined in the indentures governing the 10% Notes and 8.5% Notes and the credit agreement governing the Term Loan Facility) for such trailing four quarter period. As of December 31, 2013, under the 10% Notes, the FCCR was approximately 2.60 to 1.0.

A breach of the covenants under the indentures that govern our 10% Notes and 8.5% Notes or the credit agreements that govern the ABL Facility and Term Loan Facility could result in an event of default under the applicable indenture or credit agreement. Such a default may allow the creditors to accelerate the related debt and may result in the acceleration of any other debt to which a cross-acceleration or cross-default provision applies. In addition, an event of default under the ABL Facility would permit the lenders under the ABL Facility to terminate all commitments to extend further credit under that facility. Furthermore, if we were unable to repay the amounts due and payable under our ABL Facility or the Term Loan Facility, those lenders could proceed against the collateral granted to them to secure that indebtedness. In the event our lenders or noteholders accelerate the repayment of our borrowings, we cannot provide assurance that we and our subsidiaries would have sufficient assets to repay such indebtedness.

As of December 31, 2013, we were in compliance with all covenants under the indentures that govern the 10% Notes and 8.5% Notes and the credit agreements that govern the ABL Facility and Term Loan Facility.

64

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 31, 2013

Consolidated Cash Flow and Adjusted Consolidated Cash Flow

Consolidated Cash Flow (“CCF”) represents net earnings (loss) before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (including the effects of fresh-start accounting), and loss from debt retirement. ACCF is defined as CCF further adjusted to exclude certain cash and non-cash, non-recurring items. CCF and ACCF are not defined terms under U.S. GAAP. Neither CCF nor ACCF should be considered an alternative to operating income or net earnings (loss) as a measure of operating results. There are material limitations associated with making the adjustments to our earnings to calculate CCF and ACCF and using these non-U.S. GAAP financial measures as compared to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP financial measures. For instance, CCF and ACCF do not include:

• interest expense, and, because we have borrowed money in order to finance our operations, interest expense is a necessary element of our costs and ability to generate revenue;

• depreciation and amortization expense, and, because we use capital assets, depreciation and amortization expense is a necessary element of our costs and ability to generate revenue;

• income tax expense, and because the payment of taxes is part of our operations, tax expense is a necessary element of our costs and ability to operate; or

• certain cash and non-cash non-recurring items, and, because such non-recurring items can, at times, affect our operating results, the exclusion of such items is a material limitation.

We present CCF because we consider it an important supplemental measure of our performance and believe it is frequently used by our investors and other interested parties, as well as by our management, in the evaluation of companies in our industry, many of which present CCF when reporting their results. In addition, CCF provides additional information used by our management and Board of Directors to facilitate internal comparisons to historical operating performance of prior periods. Further, management believes that CCF facilitates operating performance comparisons from period to period because it excludes potential differences caused by variations in capital structure (affecting interest expense), tax positions (such as the impact of changes in effective tax rates or net operating losses) and the age and book depreciation of facilities and equipment (affecting depreciation expense).

We believe that the inclusion of supplementary adjustments to CCF applied in presenting ACCF are appropriate to provide additional information to investors about the performance of the business, and we are required to reconcile net earnings (loss) to ACCF to demonstrate compliance with debt covenants. While the determination of appropriate adjustments in the calculation of ACCF is subject to interpretation under the terms of the 10% Notes, management believes the adjustments described below are in accordance with the covenants in the indenture governing the 10% Notes.

65

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 31, 2013

The following table reconciles net earnings (loss) to CCF and ACCF for the 10% Notes for the trailing four quarters ended December 31, 2013 and 2012:

	Trailing Four Quarters
	Ended December 31,
	2013			2012
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Net (loss) earnings	$	(8.3	)	$	9.5
(Benefit) provision for income taxes	(3.1		)	15.3
Loss from debt retirement	—			6.4
Interest expense	99.4			96.5
Investment income	(0.1		)	(0.1		)
Depreciation and amortization expense	95.2			83.7
Consolidated Cash Flow	183.1			211.3
Investment income	0.1			0.1
Non-cash impairment charges	4.3			—
Non-recurring losses (a)	5.4			2.8
Acquisition fees and expenses	2.2			0.4
Loss (gain) on sale of assets	0.6			(0.1		)
Joint venture income	(0.1		)	(0.4		)
Share-based compensation expense	10.5			4.6
Net foreign exchange gains (b)	(0.2		)	(0.2		)
Restructuring and transformation charges (c)	35.4			16.2
Pro-forma effect of acquisitions and dispositions (d)	10.4			0.3
Adjusted Consolidated Cash Flow	$	251.7		$	235.0

(a) Amounts relate to non-recurring gains or losses, as defined in the indenture governing the 10% Notes. For the trailing four quarters ended December 31, 2013, this amount includes (1) approximately $1.7 million in one-time compensation charges, (2) approximately $2.0 million of charges within the TECH segment relating to the decision to discontinue certain product lines, (3) approximately $2.1 million of charges within the DMS segment relating to the write off of an indemnification asset associated with a reserve for uncertain tax positions (see Note 8, "Income Taxes", tothe consolidated financial statements, Item 8 of Part II, included elsewhere in this report), and (4) accretion of approximately $(0.4) million to record leasehold fair value adjustments.

For the trailing four quarters ended December 31, 2012, this amount includes (1) approximately $3.7 million of charges within the TECH segment relating to the decision to discontinue development of a certain new product, (2) royalty income of approximately $(1.0) million recorded within the TECH segment, (3) approximately $0.3 million of expense related to strategic reviews, (4) approximately $0.3 million of charges within the CES segment relating to the decision to discontinue a certain product line within a region, and (5) accretion of approximately $(0.5) million to record leasehold fair value adjustments.

(b) Non-cash foreign exchange (gains) losses related to intercompany debt not indefinitely invested in our subsidiaries, recorded within Unallocated.

66

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 31, 2013

(c) Includes all restructuring charges, including severance, relocation and transformation/transition costs. Costs associated with these activities for the trailing four quarters ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

	Trailing Four Quarters
	Ended December 31,
	2013			2012
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
TECH Segment Combination	$	7.2		$	6.1
Manufacturing Rationalization & Relocation Initiative	9.5			—
Warehousing & Distribution Consolidation	4.0			—
Other operational improvement initiatives	14.9			7.1
All other exit and disposal activities	(0.2		)	3.0
	$	35.4		$	16.2

(d) For 2013, includes the pro-forma effect of our acquisitions of 2GIG and Gefen Distribution, principally all of which relates to 2GIG, as if the acquisitions had occurred on the first day of the four-quarter reference period. For 2012, includes the pro-forma effect of our acquisition of TV One as if the acquisition had occurred on the first day of the four-quarter reference period, and the pro-forma effect of our disposition of Litetouch (sold on February 17, 2012) as if the disposition had occurred on the first day of the four-quarter reference period. See Note 2, "Acquisitions and Other Investments", tothe consolidated financial statements, Item 8 of Part II, included elsewhere in this report, for additional pro forma information relating to the acquisition of 2GIG.

As noted previously, under the ABL Facility, if (i) excess availability falls below the greater of $30.0 million or 12.5% of the borrowing base, or (ii) an event of default has occurred and is continuing, we will be required to satisfy and maintain a consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio measured on a trailing four quarter basis of not less than 1.0 to 1.0. At December 31, 2013, excess availability for purposes of compliance with a covenant trigger event under the ABL Facility was approximately $247.7 million (based upon the November 2013 borrowing base calculation), which exceeded $30.0 million and 12.5% of the borrowing base. Our FCCR under the ABL Facility at December 31, 2013 was 1.88 to 1.0. Similar to the 10% Notes, the FCCR under the ABL Facility is the ratio of the ACCF to Fixed Charges; however, in addition to other differences, the ACCF under the ABL Facility is further reduced by the aggregate amount of all capital expenditures for the trailing four quarters and income taxes paid or payable in cash for the trailing four quarters, and Fixed Charges under the ABL Facility are further increased by mandatory principal payments during the period. As a result, ACCF under the ABL Facility at December 31, 2013 was approximately $186.9 million.

67

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 31, 2013

Inflation, Trends and General Considerations

From time to time, we have evaluated and expect to continue to evaluate possible acquisition transactions and the possible dispositions of certain of our businesses, and at any given time we may be engaged in discussions or negotiations with respect to possible acquisitions or dispositions.

The demand for our products is seasonal, particularly in the Northeast and Midwest regions of the United States where inclement weather during the winter months usually reduces the level of building and remodeling activity in both the home improvement and new construction markets. Our lower sales levels usually occur during the first and fourth quarters. Since a high percentage of our manufacturing overhead and operating expenses are relatively fixed throughout the year, operating income and net earnings tend to be lower in quarters with lower sales levels. In addition, the demand for cash to fund the working capital needs of our subsidiaries is greater from late in the first quarter until early in the fourth quarter.

We are subject to the effects of changing prices and the impact of inflation which could have a significant adverse effect on our results of operations. In some circumstances, market conditions or customer expectations may prevent us from increasing the prices of our products to offset the inflationary pressures that may increase costs in the future. Continued strategic sourcing initiatives and other cost reduction measures help mitigate fluctuations in such costs, including commodity and freight costs. See “- Industry Overview".

As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, approximately 3.2% and 4.8%, respectively, of our workforce was subject to various collective bargaining agreements.

A work stoppage at one of our facilities could cause us to lose sales, incur increased costs and adversely affect our ability to meet customers’ needs. A plant shutdown or a substantial modification to a collective bargaining agreement could result in material gains or losses or the recognition of an asset impairment. As agreements expire and until negotiations are completed, we do not know whether we will be able to negotiate collective bargaining agreements on the same or more favorable terms as the current agreements or at all and without production interruptions, including labor stoppages.

Market Risk

As discussed more specifically below, we are exposed to market risks related to changes in interest rates, foreign currencies and commodity pricing. We do not use derivative financial instruments, except on a limited basis, to periodically mitigate certain economic exposures. We do not enter into derivative financial instruments or other financial instruments for trading purposes.

A. Interest Rate Risk

We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates primarily through our investing and borrowing activities.  In addition, our ability to finance future acquisition transactions may be impacted if we are unable to obtain appropriate financing at acceptable interest rates.

Our investing strategy to manage interest rate exposure is to invest in short-term, highly liquid investments and marketable securities.  Short-term investments primarily consist of federal agency discount notes, treasury bills and bank issued money market instruments with original maturities of 90 days or less.  At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the fair value of our unrestricted and restricted investments and marketable securities was not materially different from their cost basis.

We manage our borrowing exposure to changes in interest rates by optimizing the use of fixed rate debt with extended maturities.  At both December 31, 2013 and 2012, approximately 92% of the carrying value of our long-term debt was at fixed interest rates.  The remaining portion of our long-term debt is at variable interest rates.  Based upon interest rates in effect at December 31, 2013, an overall unfavorable change in interest rates of 100 basis points would result in an additional charge to interest expense of approximately $0.9 million.

See the table set forth in Item D (Long-term Debt) below and Note 4, “Notes, Mortgage Notes and Obligations Payable”, to the consolidated financial statements, Item 8 of Part II, included elsewhere in this report for further disclosure of the terms of our debt.

68

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 31, 2013

B. Foreign Currency Risk

Our results of operations are affected by fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar as compared to the value of currencies in foreign markets primarily related to changes in the Euro, the Canadian Dollar and the British Pound.  In 2013 the net impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates was not material to our financial condition or results of operations.  The impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to translation resulted in a decrease in stockholders’ investment of approximately $3.0 million for 2013, an increase in stockholders' investment of approximately $1.4 million for 2012, and a decrease in stockholder's investment of approximately $1.6 million for 2011. The impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to transactions resulted in an increase in foreign exchange losses recorded in SG&A of approximately $1.1 million for 2013 as compared to 2012 and a decrease in foreign exchange losses recorded in SG&A of approximately $3.7 million for 2012 as compared to 2011.

We manage our exposure to foreign currency exchange risk principally by trying to minimize our net investment in foreign assets, including the use of strategic short and long-term borrowings at the foreign subsidiary level. Consistent with this strategy, short term bank obligations at December 31, 2013 consist primarily of short-term borrowings by certain of our foreign subsidiaries. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, our net investment in foreign assets was approximately $180.3 million and $166.9 million, respectively. An overall unfavorable change in foreign exchange rates in effect at December 31, 2013 of 10% would result in a reduction in equity as a result of the impact on the cumulative translation adjustment of approximately $16.4 million. We generally do not enter into derivative financial instruments to manage foreign currency exposure.

C. Commodity Pricing Risk

We are subject to significant market risk with respect to the pricing of our principal raw materials, which include, among others, steel, copper, aluminum, electronics, motors, plastics, compressors, various chemicals and paints, and packaging. If prices of these raw materials were to increase dramatically, we may not be able to pass such increases on to customers and, as a result, gross margins could decline significantly. We manage our exposure to commodity pricing risk by continuing to diversify our product mix, strategic buying programs and vendor partnering.

We generally do not enter into derivative financial instruments to manage commodity-pricing exposure. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, we did not have any material outstanding commodity forward contracts.

69

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

December 31, 2013

D. Long-term Debt

The table that follows sets forth our long-term debt obligations (excluding approximately $4.5 million of net unamortized debt premium), principal cash flows by scheduled maturity, weighted average interest rates and estimated fair market values. Less than 1% of our total long-term indebtedness is denominated in foreign currencies. The weighted average interest rates for variable rate debt are based on December 31, 2013 interest rates.

Long-term Debt:

	Scheduled Maturity						Weighted Average Interest Rate
Year-Ending	Fixed Rate		Variable Rate		Total		Fixed Rate		Variable Rate		Total
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
December 31, 2014	$	2.8	$	0.3	$	3.1	7.3	%	2.7	%	6.9	%
2015	2.6		0.3		2.9		7.4		2.7		6.9
2016	0.7		0.3		1.0		6.3		2.7		5.1
2017	0.7		93.3		94.0		6.1		5.2		5.3
2018	250.4		0.3		250.7		10.0		2.7		10.0
Thereafter	739.7		0.2		739.9		8.5		2.7		8.5
Total Long-term Debt at December 31, 2013 (1)	$	996.9	$	94.7	$	1,091.6	8.9	%	5.2	%	8.6	%
Fair Market Value of Long-term Debt at December 31, 2013 (2)	$	1,104.6	$	94.7	$	1,199.3

(1) Includes our 8.5% Notes with a total principal amount of $735.0 million, our 10% Notes with a total principal amount of $250.0 million, and remaining outstanding borrowings under our Term Loan Facility of approximately $93.0 million.

(2) We determined the fair market value of our 10% Notes and 8.5% Notes using available market quotes from published sources. For our remaining outstanding indebtedness (including outstanding borrowings under the ABL Facility and Term Loan Facility), we assumed that the carrying value of such indebtedness approximated the fair value based upon the variable interest rates associated with certain of these debt obligations and our estimated credit risk.

See “- Liquidity and Capital Resources” and Note 4, “Notes, Mortgage Notes and Obligations Payable”, to the consolidated financial statements, Item 8 of Part II, included elsewhere in this report for further information concerning our outstanding debt obligations.

70

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

December 31, 2013

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk are set forth in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Market Risk".

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

Financial statements and supplementary data required by this Item 8 are set forth at the pages indicated in Item 15(a), including exhibits, of Part IV of this report, incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

Not applicable.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

The required certifications of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer are included as Exhibits 31.1-31.2 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The disclosures set forth in this Item 9A contain information concerning the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, management's report on internal control over financial reporting and changes in internal control over financial reporting referred to in those certifications. Those certifications should be read in conjunction with this Item 9A for a more complete understanding of the matters covered by the certifications.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

With the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Company's management has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2012. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including the Company's Chief Executive Officer and the Company's Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2013, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were designed and are functioning effectively.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the Company's fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2013, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

71

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

December 31, 2013

Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). The Company's internal control system is designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company's management, Board of Directors and shareholders regarding the preparation and fair presentation of the Company's published financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

• pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;

• provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with the authorization of management of the Company; and

• provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, even an effective system of internal control over financial reporting can only provide reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Our internal controls over financial reporting are subject to various inherent limitations, including cost limitations, judgments used in decision making, assumptions about the likelihood of future events, the soundness of our systems, the possibility of human error and the risk of fraud. Moreover, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may be inadequate because of changes in conditions and the risk that the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate over time.

Management’s assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did not include the internal controls of 2GIG Technologies, Inc., which is included in the consolidated financial statements of Nortek, Inc. as of December 31, 2013 and constituted approximately 2% of total assets as of December 31, 2013 and approximately 5% of net sales for the year then ended.

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013. In making its assessment of internal control over financial reporting, management used the criteria issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (1992 Framework).

Based on the results of this assessment, management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has concluded that, as of December 31, 2013, the Company's internal control over financial reporting was effective.

The Company's independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, has also issued an audit report on the Company's internal control over financial reporting, which is included immediately following this report.

72

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Nortek, Inc. and subsidiaries

We have audited Nortek, Inc. and subsidiaries' internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 Framework) (the COSO criteria). Nortek, Inc. and subsidiaries' management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying management's annual report on internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

As indicated in the accompanying management’s annual report on internal control over financial reporting,  management’s assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did not include the internal controls of 2GIG Technologies, Inc., which is included in the consolidated financial statements of Nortek, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013 and constituted approximately 2% of total assets as of December 31, 2013 and approximately 5% of net sales for the year then ended. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of Nortek, Inc. and subsidiaries also did not include an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of 2GIG Technologies, Inc.

In our opinion, Nortek, Inc. and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), cash flows, and stockholders' investment for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013 of Nortek, Inc. and subsidiaries and our report dated March 11, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Boston, Massachusetts

March 11, 2014

73

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

December 31, 2013

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.

The information required by this Item 10 with respect to executive officers of the Company is contained at the end of Part I of this Form 10-K under the heading “Executive Officers of the Registrant.”

Code of Ethics. The Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code of Ethics”) that applies to the Company's principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, controller, and any persons performing similar functions, as well as all directors, officers and employees of the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates. The Code of Ethics is posted on the Company's website at www.nortekinc.com at “Corporate Governance” under “Investors". A copy of the Code of Ethics is also available without charge by requesting them in writing from Nortek, Inc., 50 Kennedy Plaza, Providence, Rhode Island 02903. The Company intends to satisfy the disclosure requirement regarding any amendment to, or a waiver from, a provision of the Code of Ethics for the Company's principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, by posting such information on its website.

The other information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement for our 2014 annual meeting of stockholders (“2014 Proxy Statement”) to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after December 31, 2013.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

The other information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from the 2014 Proxy Statement.

74

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

December 31, 2013

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The table below provides information about shares of our common stock that may be issued upon exercise of options, warrants, and rights under our 2009 Omnibus Incentive Plan. All outstanding awards relate to shares of our common stock. Information is as of December 31, 2013, unless otherwise indicated.

Plan Category	(a)Number of Securities to be Issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights		Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights		Number of Securities Remaining for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column(a))(1)
Equity compensation plans approved by security   holders	1,276,873	(2)	$	42.68	1,249,317
Equity compensation plans not approved by   security holders	—		N/A		—

(1) The number of securities remaining for future issuance under our 2009 Omnibus Incentive Plan may be issued as incentive stock options, nonstatutory stock awards, other stock-based awards and performance-based compensation awards. All of the securities remaining for future issuance under our 2009 Omnibus Incentive Plan may be issued as incentive stock options.

(2) Consists of 156,930 incentive stock options and 473,750 non-qualified stock options issued pursuant to our 2009 Omnibus Incentive Plan and warrants to purchase 646,193 shares of common stock and excludes shares of restricted stock granted pursuant to our 2009 Omnibus Incentive Plan. The warrants were issued to the former holders of NTK Holdings, Inc. debt in connection with the Reorganization and are not compensatory. See Note 10, “Equity Activity” and Note 12, "Share-Based Compensation".

The other information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from the 2014 Proxy Statement.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.

The other information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from the 2014 Proxy Statement.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.

The other information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from the 2014 Proxy Statement.

75

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

December 31, 2013

PART IV

ITEM 15.EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

(a) Financial Statements.

See the index to consolidated financial statements set forth on page F-1.

(b) Financial Statement Schedules

Schedule II    Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

All other financial statement schedules are not required or are included in the consolidated financial statements.

(c) The exhibits are listed in the Exhibit Index, which is incorporated herein by reference

76

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

December 31, 2013

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on March 11, 2014.

 NORTEK, INC.

/s/ Michael J. Clarke

Michael J. Clarke

Chief Executive Officer and President

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated, as of March 11, 2014.

/s/ Michael J. Clarke	/s/ Jeffrey C. Bloomberg
Michael J. Clarke	Jeffrey C. Bloomberg
Chief Executive Officer and President	Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
	/s/ Joseph M. Cianciolo
/s/ Almon C. Hall	Joseph M. Cianciolo
Almon C. Hall	Director
Authorized Officer, Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)	/s/ John T. Coleman
	John T. Coleman
/s/ Donald W. Reilly	Director
Donald W. Reilly
Authorized Officer, Vice President - Corporate Controller	/s/ James B. Hirshorn
Chief Accounting Officer	James B. Hirshorn
	Director
	/s/ Thomas A. Keenan
	Thomas A. Keenan
	Director
	/s/ Daniel C. Lukas
	Daniel C. Lukas
	Director
	/s/ Bennett Rosenthal
	Bennett Rosenthal
	Director
	/s/ J. David Smith
	J. David Smith
	Director

77

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

	Page No.
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011	F - 2
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011	F - 3
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2013 and 2012	F - 4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011	F - 6
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Investment for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011	F - 7
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements	F - 8
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F - 62

F - 1

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

	For the year ended December 31,
	2013			2012			2011
	(Dollar amounts in millions, except per share data)
Net Sales	$	2,287.9		$	2,201.3		$	2,140.5
Cost of products sold	1,627.4			1,560.9			1,567.8
Gross profit	660.5			640.4			572.7
Selling, general and administrative expense, net	521.3			468.5			464.8
Amortization of intangible assets	51.3			44.3			44.8
Operating earnings	87.9			127.6			63.1
Interest expense	(99.4		)	(96.5		)	(105.6		)
Loss from debt retirement	—			(6.4		)	(33.8		)
Investment income	0.1			0.1			0.1
(Loss) earnings before (benefit) provision      for income taxes	(11.4		)	24.8			(76.2		)
(Benefit) provision for income taxes	(3.1		)	15.3			(20.3		)
Net (loss) earnings	$	(8.3	)	$	9.5		$	(55.9	)
Basic (loss) earnings per share	$	(0.54	)	$	0.63		$	(3.70	)
Diluted (loss) earnings per share	$	(0.54	)	$	0.61		$	(3.70	)
Weighted Average Common Shares:
Basic	15,371,932			15,152,286			15,122,976
Diluted	15,371,932			15,531,205			15,122,976

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 2

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

	For the year ended December 31,
	2013			2012			2011
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Net (loss) earnings	$	(8.3	)	$	9.5		$	(55.9	)
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:
Currency translation adjustment	(3.0		)	1.4			(1.6		)
Pension liability adjustments:
Actuarial gain (loss) arising during the period	14.3			(3.3		)	(29.9		)
Amortization to net income of net actuarial loss	0.7			0.4			(0.2		)
Deferred income taxes on pension liability	(6.0		)	—			10.1
Total pension liability adjustments, net of tax	9.0			(2.9		)	(20.0		)
Other comprehensive income (loss)	6.0			(1.5		)	(21.6		)
Comprehensive (loss) income	$	(2.3	)	$	8.0		$	(77.5	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 3

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollar amounts in millions)

	December 31,
	2013		2012
Assets
Current Assets:
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents	$	80.9	$	144.7
Restricted cash	2.9		0.2
Accounts receivable, less allowances of $4.2 million and $7.2 million, respectively	276.4		257.4
Inventories:
Raw materials	80.1		81.0
Work in process	23.7		22.7
Finished goods	166.7		154.7
	270.5		258.4
Prepaid expenses	20.2		14.4
Other current assets	12.2		13.5
Tax refunds receivable	7.2		6.5
Deferred tax assets	29.7		29.3
Total current assets	700.0		724.4
Property and Equipment, at Cost:
Land	17.8		18.3
Buildings and improvements	112.0		83.6
Machinery and equipment	261.8		221.1
	391.6		323.0
Less accumulated depreciation	159.2		123.5
Total property and equipment, net	232.4		199.5
Other Assets:
Goodwill	373.5		307.6
Intangible assets, less accumulated amortization of $178.6 million and      $127.3 million, respectively	648.9		614.9
Deferred debt expense	16.3		19.0
Restricted investments and marketable securities	1.6		1.9
Other assets	18.2		20.8
	1,058.5		964.2
Total Assets	$	1,990.9	$	1,888.1

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 4

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in millions, except shares data)

	December 31,
	2013			2012
Liabilities and Stockholders' Investment
Current Liabilities:
Short-term bank obligations	$	0.7		$	0.7
Current maturities of long-term debt	2.8			2.4
Accounts payable	214.7			174.4
Accrued expenses and taxes	231.5			198.9
Total current liabilities	449.7			376.4
Other Liabilities:
Deferred income taxes	159.1			132.7
Other	188.9			186.9
	348.0			319.6
Notes, Mortgage Notes and Obligations Payable, Less Current Maturities	1,093.3			1,097.9
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 6)
Stockholders' Investment:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 10,000,000 authorized shares; none issued and      outstanding at December 31, 2013 and 2012	—			—
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 90,000,000 authorized shares; 15,682,746 shares issued      and 15,471,150 shares issued at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively	0.2			0.1
Additional paid-in capital	203.6			189.1
Accumulated deficit	(71.5		)	(63.2		)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(16.3		)	(22.3		)
Less: Treasury stock at cost, 263,145 shares and 172,685 shares at December 31, 2013      and 2012, respectively	(16.1		)	(9.5		)
Total stockholders' investment	99.9			94.2
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Investment	$	1,990.9		$	1,888.1

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 5

 NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	For the year ended December 31,
	2013			2012			2011
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net (loss) earnings	$	(8.3	)	$	9.5		$	(55.9	)
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) earnings to net cash provided      by operating activities:
Depreciation expense	40.6			38.5			41.2
Amortization expense, including increase to cost of goods sold for inventory acquired      in business combinations	54.6			45.2			52.7
Non-cash impairment charges	4.3			—			—
Loss from debt retirement	—			6.4			33.8
Non-cash interest expense, net	2.4			5.6			6.0
Non-cash share-based compensation expense	10.5			4.6			1.7
Loss (gain) on sale of property and equipment	0.6			(0.4		)	1.0
Deferred income tax (benefit) provision	(7.7		)	4.3			(29.1		)
Changes in certain assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions:
Accounts receivable, net	5.8			18.4			7.5
Inventories	(0.7		)	45.9			1.8
Prepaid and other current assets	(2.1		)	2.8			(7.1		)
Accounts payable	23.7			12.6			(15.8		)
Accrued expenses and taxes	29.0			(8.8		)	41.0
Long-term assets, liabilities and other, net	(17.5		)	(20.4		)	2.1
Total adjustments to net (loss) earnings	143.5			154.7			136.8
Net cash provided by operating activities	135.2			164.2			80.9
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures	(43.8		)	(24.1		)	(21.1		)
Net cash paid for businesses acquired	(146.4		)	(2.6		)	(30.9		)
Investment in joint venture	—			—			(5.3		)
Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment	0.2			3.0			1.3
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash and marketable securities	(2.4		)	0.2			0.2
Other, net	(0.9		)	—			0.1
Net cash used in investing activities	(193.3		)	(23.5		)	(55.7		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from borrowings	153.1			34.6			82.8
Payment of borrowings	(156.0		)	(84.0		)	(140.3		)
Net proceeds from the sale of the 8.5% Senior Notes due 2021	—			251.7			500.0
Net proceeds from borrowings under the Term Loan Facility	—			—			348.2
Redemption of the Term Loan Facility	—			(251.7		)	—
Redemption of the 11% Senior Secured Notes due 2013	—			—			(753.3		)
Fees paid in connection with debt facilities	—			(5.9		)	(59.6		)
Net (use) proceeds from equity transactions	(2.5		)	1.2			(2.7		)
Other, net	(0.3		)	(0.1		)	0.2
Net cash used in financing activities	(5.7		)	(54.2		)	(24.7		)
Net change in unrestricted cash and cash equivalents	(63.8		)	86.5			0.5
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period	144.7			58.2			57.7
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period	$	80.9		$	144.7		$	58.2

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 6

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ INVESTMENT

	Common Stock			Treasury Stock
	Nominal Value		Number	Nominal Value			Number	Additional Paid in Capital		Accumulated Deficit			Accumulated Other Compre-hensive Income (Loss)			Total Stockholders' Investment
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Balance, December 31, 2010	$	0.1	15,000,000	$	—		—	$	174.7	$	(16.8	)	$	0.8		$	158.8
Net loss	—		—	—			—	—		(55.9		)	—			(55.9		)
Other comprehensive loss	—		—	—			—	—		—			(21.6		)	(21.6		)
Vesting of restricted common stock	—		175,261	(2.7		)	62,332	—		—			—			(2.7		)
Exercise of stock options	—		28,928	(0.4		)	12,618	0.5		—			—			0.1
Warrants exercised	—		—	—			—	—		—			—			—
Share-based compensation expense	—		—	—			—	1.7		—			—			1.7
Balance, December 31, 2011	$	0.1	15,204,189	$	(3.1	)	74,950	$	176.9	$	(72.7	)	$	(20.8	)	$	80.4
Net earnings	—		—	—			—	—		9.5			—			9.5
Other comprehensive loss	—		—	—			—	—		—			(1.5		)	(1.5		)
Vesting of restricted common stock	—		26,865	(0.4		)	8,032	—		—			—			(0.4		)
Exercise of stock options	—		143,652	(0.9		)	13,779	2.5		—			—			1.6
Warrants exercised			96,444	(5.1		)	75,924	5.1		—			—			—
Share-based compensation expense	—		—	—			—	4.6		—			—			4.6
Balance, December 31, 2012	$	0.1	15,471,150	$	(9.5	)	172,685	$	189.1	$	(63.2	)	$	(22.3	)	$	94.2
Net loss	—		—	—			—	—		(8.3		)	—			(8.3		)
Other comprehensive income	—		—	—			—	—		—			6.0			6.0
Vesting of restricted common stock	—		90,329	(2.2		)	29,457	—		—			—			(2.2		)
Exercise of stock options	0.1		74,430	(1.9		)	27,047	1.5		—			—			(0.3		)
Warrants exercised	—		46,837	(2.5		)	33,956	2.5		—			—			—
Share-based compensation expense	—		—	—			—	10.5		—			—			10.5
Balance, December 31, 2013	$	0.2	15,682,746	$	(16.1	)	263,145	$	203.6	$	(71.5	)	$	(16.3	)	$	99.9

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 7

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

Nortek, Inc. (“Nortek”) and all of its wholly owned subsidiaries, collectively the “Company,” is a global, diversified company whose many market-leading brands deliver broad capabilities and a wide array of innovative, technology-driven products and solutions for lifestyle improvement at home and at work. Operating within five reporting segments (see Note 9, “Segment Information and Concentration of Credit Risk”), the Company manufactures and sells, primarily in the United States, Canada and Europe, with additional manufacturing in China and Mexico, a wide variety of products for the remodeling and replacement markets, the residential and commercial new construction markets, the manufactured housing market, and the personal and enterprise computer markets.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect the financial position, results of operations, comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows of the Company after elimination of intercompany accounts and transactions. Certain amounts in the prior year's consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates

The preparation of these consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles involves estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting periods. Certain of the Company’s accounting policies require the application of judgment in selecting the appropriate assumptions for calculating financial estimates. By their nature, these judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. The Company periodically evaluates the judgments and estimates used for its critical accounting policies to ensure that such judgments and estimates are reasonable for its interim and year-end reporting requirements. These judgments and estimates are based on the Company’s historical experience, current trends and information available from other sources, as appropriate. If different conditions result from those assumptions used in the Company’s judgments, the results could be materially different from the Company’s estimates.

Recognition of Sales and Related Costs, Incentives and Allowances

The Company recognizes sales based upon shipment of products to customers and has procedures in place at each of its subsidiaries to ensure that an accurate cut-off is obtained for each reporting period. The Company considers revenue to be realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of a sales arrangement exists; delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; the price is fixed or determinable; and collectability is reasonably assured. Revenue is recognized upon passage of title and risk of loss to customers, unless the Company is required to provide additional services, and provided it can form an estimate for sales returns. When a sale arrangement involves training, installation, or other deliverables, the arrangement is evaluated to determine whether it represents a multiple element arrangement. The Company recognizes revenue on such multiple-element arrangements in accordance with Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2009-13, "Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements" ("ASU 2009-13") based on the estimated selling price of each element. In accordance with ASU 2009-13, the Company uses vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”), if available, to determine the selling price of each element. If VSOE is not available, the Company uses third-party evidence or its best estimated selling price to determine the selling price for each element.

Allowances for cash discounts, volume rebates and other customer incentive programs, as well as gross customer returns, among others, are recorded as a reduction of sales at the time of sale based upon the estimated future outcome. Cash discounts, volume rebates, and other customer incentive programs are based upon certain percentages agreed to with the Company’s various customers, which are typically earned by the customer over an annual period. The Company records periodic estimates for these amounts based upon the historical results to date, estimated future results through the end of the contract period and the contractual provisions of the customer agreements. For calendar year customer agreements, the Company is able to adjust its periodic estimates to actual amounts as of December 31 each year based upon the contractual provisions of the customer agreements. For those customers who have agreements that are not on a calendar year cycle, the Company records estimates at December 31 consistent with the above described methodology. Customers are generally not required to provide collateral for purchases. Customer returns are recorded on an actual basis throughout the year and also include an estimate at the end of each reporting

F - 8

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

period for future customer returns related to sales recorded prior to the end of the period. The Company generally estimates customer returns based upon the time lag that historically occurs between the date of the sale and the date of the return while also factoring in any new business conditions that might impact the historical analysis, such as new product introduction. The Company also provides for its estimate of warranty, bad debts and shipping costs at the time of sale. Shipping and warranty costs are included in cost of products sold ("COGS"). Bad debt provisions are included in selling, general and administrative expense, net ("SG&A"). The amounts recorded are generally based upon historically derived percentages while also factoring in any new business conditions that might impact the historical analysis, such as new product introductions for warranty and customer bankruptcies for bad debts.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents consist of short-term highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less which are readily convertible into cash.

The Company has classified as restricted in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet certain cash and cash equivalents that are not fully available for use in its operations. At December 31, 2013 and2012, the Company had cash and cash equivalents pledged as collateral or held in pension trusts for certain debt, insurance, employee benefits and other requirements of approximately $4.5 million (of which approximately $1.6 million is included in long-term assets) and approximately $2.1 million (of which approximately $1.9 million is included in long-term assets), respectively.

Inventories

Inventories in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet are valued at the lower of cost or market. At December 31, 2013, approximately $78.4 million of the Company's total inventories were valued on the last-in, first-out method (“LIFO”) of accounting. Under the first-in, first-out method (“FIFO”), such inventories would have been approximately $0.7 million lower atDecember 31, 2013. At December 31, 2012, approximately $73.4 million of the Company's total inventories were valued under LIFO. Under FIFO, such inventories would have been approximately $0.4 million lower atDecember 31, 2012. All other inventories were valued under the FIFO method.

In connection with both LIFO and FIFO inventories, the Company records provisions, as appropriate, to write-down obsolete and excess inventory to estimated net realizable value. The process for evaluating obsolete and excess inventory often requires the Company to make subjective judgments and estimates concerning future sales levels, quantities, and prices at which such inventory will be able to be sold in the normal course of business. Accelerating the disposal process or incorrect estimates of future sales potential may cause the actual results to differ from the estimates at the time such inventory is disposed or sold.

Inventory acquired in business combinations is recorded to cost of products sold over the estimated period in which the inventory will be sold.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment, including capital leases, is provided on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, which are generally as follows:

Buildings and improvements	3 - 46 years
Machinery and equipment, including leases	1 - 17 years
Leasehold improvements	Shorter of the term of lease or the estimated useful life

Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are expensed when incurred. Expenditures for renewals and betterments are capitalized. When assets are sold, or otherwise disposed, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are eliminated and the resulting gain or loss is recognized.

During 2013, the Company recorded a non-cash addition to buildings within property and equipment and other long-term liabilities of approximately $33.6 million related to construction in progress of new facilities in Mexico (see Note 16, "Cash Flows").

F - 9

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The Company accounts for acquired goodwill in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 805, "Business Combinations" ("ASC 805") and ASC 350, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other” (“ASC 350”), which involves judgment with respect to the determination of the valuation of the acquired assets and liabilities assumed in order to determine the final amount of goodwill recorded in a purchase. See Note 3, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, for a discussion of these judgments.

Pensions and Post-Retirement Health Benefits

The Company accounts for pensions and post-retirement health benefits in accordance with ASC 715, “Compensation - Retirement Benefits,” (“ASC 715”). The accounting for pensions requires the estimation of such items as the long-term average return on plan assets, the discount rate, the rate of compensation increase, and the assumed medical cost inflation rate. Such estimates require a significant amount of judgment. See Note 13, “Pension, Profit Sharing and Other Post-Retirement Benefits”, for a discussion of these judgments.

Insurance Liabilities

The Company records insurance liabilities and related expenses for health, workers compensation, product and general liability losses, and other insurance reserves and expenses in accordance with either the contractual terms of its policies or, if self-insured, the total liabilities that are estimable and probable as of the reporting date. Insurance liabilities are recorded as current liabilities to the extent they are expected to be paid in the succeeding year, with the remaining requirements classified as long-term liabilities. The accounting for self-insured plans requires that significant judgments and estimates be made both with respect to the future liabilities to be paid for known claims, and incurred but not reported claims as of the reporting date. The Company considers historical trends when determining the appropriate insurance liabilities to record in the consolidated balance sheet for a substantial portion of its workers compensation and general and product liability losses. In certain cases where partial insurance coverage exists, the Company must estimate the portion of the liability that will be covered by existing insurance policies to arrive at the net expected liability to the Company. Receivables for insurance recoveries for product liability claims are recorded as assets, on an undiscounted basis. These recoveries are estimated based on the contractual arrangements with vendors and other third parties, and historical trends.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes using the liability method in accordance with ASC 740, “Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”), which requires that the deferred tax consequences of temporary differences between the amounts recorded in the Company’s consolidated financial statements, and the amounts included in the Company’s federal and state income tax returns, be recognized in the balance sheet. As the Company generally does not file its income tax returns until well after the closing process for the December 31 financial statements is complete, the amounts recorded at December 31 reflect estimates of what the final amounts will be when the actual income tax returns are filed for that fiscal year. In addition, estimates are often required with respect to, among other things, the appropriate state income tax rates to use in the various states that Nortek and its subsidiaries are required to file, the potential utilization of operating and capital loss carry-forwards, and valuation allowances required, if any, for tax assets that may not be realizable in the future. ASC 740 requires balance sheet classification of current and long-term deferred income tax assets and liabilities based upon the classification of the underlying asset or liability that gives rise to a temporary difference (see Note 8, “Income Taxes”). The Company accounts for interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as part of its provision for federal and state taxes.

Share-Based Compensation Expense

The Company measures share-based compensation expense at fair value in accordance with ASC 718, “Compensation - Stock Compensation” (“ASC 718”), and recognizes such expense, net of estimated forfeitures, over the vesting period of the share-based awards. See Note 12, “Share-Based Compensation”, for further information regarding the Company's share-based compensation programs.

F - 10

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

Exit and Disposal Activities

The Company accounts for termination benefits based on the nature of the underlying arrangement. In instances where the Company has a defined plan, a past practice of providing a similar level of benefits or a statutorily defined termination benefit arrangement, the Company recognizes a liability for ongoing termination benefits when it is probable the employees will be entitled to the benefits and the amount can be reasonably estimated.

In instances where the Company provides termination benefits and an ongoing arrangement does not exist, the timing of measurement of a liability for one-time employee termination benefits depends on whether employees are required to render service until they are terminated in order to receive the termination benefits and, if so, whether employees will be retained to render service beyond a minimum retention period. If employees are not required to render service until they are terminated in order to receive the termination benefits (that is, if employees are entitled to receive the termination benefits regardless of when they leave) or if employees will not be retained to render service beyond the minimum retention period, a liability for the termination benefits is measured and recognized at its fair value at the communication date. If employees are required to render service until they are terminated in order to receive the termination benefits and will be retained to render service beyond the minimum retention period, a liability for the termination benefits is measured initially at the communication date based on the fair value of the liability as of the termination date and recognized ratably over the future service period.

A liability, measured at its fair value, for costs to terminate a contract before the end of its term is recognized when the Company terminates the contract in accordance with the contract terms. A liability for costs that will continue to be incurred under a contract for its remaining term without economic benefit to the Company is recognized at the cease-use date. If the contract is an operating lease, the fair value of the liability at the cease-use date is determined based on the remaining lease rentals, adjusted for the effects of any prepaid or deferred items recognized under the lease, and reduced by estimated sublease rentals that could be reasonably obtained for the property, even if the Company does not intend to enter into a sublease. Remaining lease rentals are not reduced to an amount less than zero.

Other costs associated with an exit or disposal activity include, but are not limited to, costs to consolidate or close facilities and relocate employees. A liability for other costs associated with an exit or disposal activity is measured and recognized at its fair value in the period in which the liability is incurred (generally, when goods or services associated with the activity are received).

See Note 5, “Exit and Disposal Activities”, for further information regarding the Company’s exit and disposal activities.

Commitments and Contingencies

The Company provides accruals for all direct costs, including legal costs, associated with the estimated resolution of contingencies at the earliest date at which it is deemed probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of such liability can be reasonably estimated. Costs accrued are estimated based upon an analysis of potential results, assuming a combination of litigation and settlement strategies and outcomes. Legal costs for other than probable contingencies are expensed when services are performed. See Note 6, “Commitments and Contingencies”, for further information regarding the Company’s commitments and contingencies.

Research and Development

The Company’s research and development activities are principally related to new product development, are recorded in SG&A, and represent approximately 2.9%, 2.7%, and 2.7% of the Company’s consolidated net sales for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Foreign Currency Translation

The financial statements of subsidiaries located outside of the United States are generally measured using the foreign subsidiary's local currency as the functional currency. The Company translates the assets and liabilities of its foreign subsidiaries at the exchange rates in effect at year-end. Gains and losses from foreign currency translation are credited or charged to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) included in stockholders’ investment. Net sales, costs and expenses are translated using average exchange rates in effect during the year. Transaction gains and losses are recorded in SG&A. 

F - 11

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

Related Party Transactions

On July 1, 2011, Mr. Hirshorn, a member of the Company's Board of Directors, entered into an agreement with the Company  pursuant to which Mr. Hirshorn provided consulting services to the then Interim Chief Executive Officer through July 2, 2012.   For his services, Mr. Hirshorn was paid a fee of $35,000 per month, plus reimbursement of related business expenses.  In July 2012, the Board approved Mr. Hirshorn's further engagement as a consultant for a period of twelve to eighteen months in connection with various transformation initiatives.  For his services, the Board approved monthly cash compensation of $35,000 and grants of (i) 4,828 shares of time-vested restricted stock, (ii) 9,657 shares of performance-vested restricted stock, and (iii) 13,016 options at $52.81 per share. Mr. Hirshorn's consulting engagement with the Company terminated as of April 1, 2013 and all outstanding and unvested options immediately vested and all forfeiture restrictions on restricted stock lapsed and such shares vest in full in accordance with the terms of the awards. (see Note 12, “Share-Based Compensation”).

New Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2013-11, Income Taxes (“ASU 2013-11”), which is intended to provide guidance regarding the presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. The standard clarifies guidance and eliminates diversity in practice on the presentation of unrecognized tax benefits when certain situations exist at the reporting date and is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2013 and subsequent interim periods. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-04, Liabilities (“ASU 2013-04”), which is intended to provide guidance for the recognition, measurement, and disclosure of obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation is fixed at the reporting date, except for obligations addressed within existing guidance in U.S. GAAP. ASU 2013-04 requires an entity to measure obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation is fixed at the reporting date as the sum of (a) the amount the reporting entity agreed to pay on the basis of its arrangement among its co-obligors and (b) any additional amount the reporting entity expects to pay on behalf of its co-obligors. ASU 2013-04 also requires an entity to disclose the nature and amount of the obligation as well as other information about those obligations. ASU 2013-04 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013 and will be applied retrospectively to all prior periods presented for those obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements that exist at the beginning of an entity's fiscal year of adoption. The Company will adopt this pronouncement in the first quarter of 2014 and does not expect its adoption to have a material effect on its financial position or results of operations.

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (“ASU 2013-02”), which is intended to improve the reporting of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. ASU 2013-02 does not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements. However, ASU 2013-02 requires an entity to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. In addition, an entity is required to present, either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income but only if the amount reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For other amounts that are not required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, an entity is required to cross-reference to other disclosures required under U.S. GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. The Company adopted ASU 2013-02 in the first quarter of 2013. The adoption of ASU 2013-02 had no effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations, but did impact the way the Company presented comprehensive income.

F - 12

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

2. ACQUISITIONS AND OTHER INVESTMENTS

On April 1, 2013, the Company acquired all of the outstanding common stock of 2GIG Technologies, Inc. (“2GIG”) from APX Group, Inc. The purchase price was approximately $164.2 million, which consisted of a cash payment at the date of acquisition of approximately $135.0 million, working capital adjustments of approximately $13.9 million (of which approximately $12.3 million and $1.6 million were paid during the second and third quarter of 2013, respectively) and the settlement of a receivable due from 2GIG to the Company as of the acquisition date of approximately $15.3 million.

2GIG is a designer and supplier of residential security and home automation systems. Developed with the assistance of Nortek's Linear® business, 2GIG's Go!Control® touch-screen panel is a self-contained, all-in-one home security and automation control panel. 2GIG also provides wireless interactive home security services and a wide range of peripheral hardware devices and system components for home security and automation solutions. The results of 2GIG have been included in the Company's results of operations since the date of acquisition and have been included in the Company's Technology Solutions ("TECH") segment.

The following is a summary of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed (amounts in millions):

Current assets (1)	$	63.9
Property and equipment, net	2.6
Goodwill	65.1
Intangible assets	84.0
Other assets	0.1
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	(20.2		)
Deferred income taxes	(31.3		)
Purchase price	$	164.2

(1) Includes cash of approximately $3.4 million, accounts receivable of approximately $42.6 million, inventories of approximately $14.3 million, prepaid and other current assets of approximately $1.9 million, and current deferred income taxes of approximately $1.7 million. Inventories include a fair value adjustment to the historical carrying value of approximately $3.1 million, which increased cost of products sold for 2013.

The excess of the purchase price paid over the fair value of 2GIG's net assets is recorded as goodwill, which is primarily attributable to opportunities for growth and profitability, as well as better positioning the Company in the growing residential security and home automation markets. The goodwill was recorded in the TECH reporting unit and the Company does not believe that any of the goodwill will be deductible for tax purposes.

The total fair value of intangible assets was approximately $84.0 million and the Company has determined that all of the intangible assets are subject to amortization and that they will have no residual value at the end of the amortization periods. The following is a summary of the estimated fair values and weighted average useful lives by intangible asset class (amounts in millions, except for weighted average useful lives):

	Fair Value		Weighted Average Useful Lives
Customer relationships	$	73.1	10.0
Completed technology	6.1		7.0
Trademarks	4.8		10.0
	$	84.0	9.7

Total intangible asset amortization relating to 2GIG for 2013 was approximately $6.6 million. Based upon current fair value estimates, annual amortization related to these acquired intangible assets is expected to be approximately $8.7 million.

F - 13

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

In connection with the acquisition of 2GIG, during 2013, the Company also incurred approximately $1.9 million of acquisition fees and expenses, which have been recorded in selling, general and administrative expense, net ("SG&A") in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.

The unaudited pro forma net sales, operating earnings, net earnings, basic and diluted earnings per share, and depreciation and amortization expense for the Company as a result of the acquisition of 2GIG for the periods presented were as follows:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2013			2012
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Net sales	$	2,319.9		$	2,247.3
Operating earnings	99.5			122.9
Net (loss) earnings	(1.5		)	5.3
Basic (loss) earnings per share	(0.10		)	0.35
Diluted (loss) earnings per share	(0.10		)	0.34
Depreciation & amortization expense	94.8			96.0

These amounts were determined assuming that the acquisition of 2GIG had occurred on January 1, 2012 and include pro forma adjustments to reflect (i) the elimination of intercompany transactions between the Company and 2GIG, (ii) additional depreciation and amortization expense related to acquired assets, (iii) increased interest expense related to the amounts borrowed to fund the acquisition and (iv) other pro forma adjustments that the Company considered appropriate related to the acquisition of 2GIG. The transaction costs of approximately $1.9 million related to the acquisition of 2GIG for the year ended December 31, 2013 have been excluded from the unaudited pro forma operating earnings, net earnings, and basic and diluted earnings per share. These pro forma amounts are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that would have been achieved had the acquisition taken place as of January 1, 2012, nor are they necessarily indicative of the results for future periods.

On February 22, 2013, the Company, through an indirect wholly-owned foreign subsidiary, acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of Gefen Distribution Verwaltungs GmbH ("Gefen Distribution") for total consideration of approximately $2.9 million, consisting of cash payments of approximately $0.9 million, a holdback amount of approximately $0.2 million to be paid 18 months subsequent to the closing of the acquisition, and the settlement of a receivable due from Gefen Distribution to the Company as of the acquisition date of approximately $1.8 million.  In connection with the acquisition of Gefen Distribution, during the second quarter of 2013, the Company also incurred approximately $0.3 million of acquisition fees and expenses, which have been recorded in SG&A in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. Gefen Distribution is the principal distributor of Gefen products in Europe and the acquisition expands the Company's European distribution of the Company's products. Gefen Distribution is included in the Company's TECH segment. Pro forma results related to the acquisition of Gefen Distribution have not been presented, as the effect is not significant to the Company's consolidated operating results.

The incremental impact of the acquisitions of 2GIG and Gefen Distribution contributed approximately $88.1 million to net sales and approximately $12.6 million (which includes depreciation and amortization expense of approximately $10.6 million, including approximately $3.1 million of increased cost of goods sold due to the recognition of inventory at its acquisition date fair value) to operating earnings for the year ended December 31, 2013.

On April 28, 2011, the Company, through wholly-owned subsidiaries, acquired all of the stock of TV One Broadcast Sales Corporation, Barcom (UK) Holdings Limited, and Barcom Asia Holdings, LLC (collectively, "TV One") for approximately $25.1 million, net of cash acquired of approximately $0.9 million.  In connection with the acquisition of TV One, in the second quarter of 2011, the Company also incurred approximately $0.8 million of fees and expenses, which were recorded in SG&A. TV One sells a complete range of video signal processing products for the professional audio/video and broadcast markets. TV One is included in the Company's Technology Solutions segment.

On March 21, 2011, the Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary Huntair Middle East Holdings, Inc. ("Huntair"), acquired a forty-nine percent minority interest in Huntair Arabia for approximately $5.3 million. Huntair Arabia is an operating joint

F - 14

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

venture between the Company and Alessa Advanced Projects Company ("Alessa") in Saudi Arabia that was formed for purposes of trading, manufacturing, supplying, installing, and servicing commercial air conditioning and commercial air handling units in Saudi Arabia and certain other regions. The Company does not have a controlling financial interest and, therefore, is accounting for this investment under the equity method of accounting within the Custom & Engineered Solutions segment. In connection with its investment in Huntair Arabia, Huntair issued a 10 year note to Alessa for approximately $5.3 million. The note does not bear interest; therefore, the Company has recorded the note net of discount on its accompanying consolidated balance sheet. For 2012 and 2011, income from Huntair Arabia was not material to the Company's consolidated operating results.

On December 17, 2010, the Company acquired all of the outstanding stock of Ergotron, Inc. (“Ergotron"). Ergotron is a designer, manufacturer and marketer of innovative, ergonomic mounting and mobility products for computer monitors, notebooks and flat panel displays in the United States and other parts of the world. The purchase price was approximately $299.6 million, consisting of cash payments totaling approximately $298.2 million, of which approximately $2.6 million and $5.8 million was paid in 2012 and 2011, respectively, primarily related to the reimbursement of federal and state tax refunds for the pre-acquisition period.

3. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Goodwill

The following table presents a summary of the activity in goodwill by reporting segment for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012:

	Dec. 31, 2011 (1)		Acquisitions		Dec. 31, 2012 (1)		Acquisitions (2)		Dec. 31, 2013 (1)
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Residential Ventilation (“RESV”):
Gross goodwill	$	156.8	$	—	$	156.8	$	—	$	156.8
Impairment losses	—		—		—		—		—
Net RESV goodwill	156.8		—		156.8		—		156.8
Technology Solutions (“TECH”):
Gross goodwill	19.4		—		19.4		65.9		85.3
Impairment losses	—		—		—		—		—
Net TECH goodwill	19.4		—		19.4		65.9		85.3
Display Mount Solutions (“DMS”):
Gross goodwill	131.4		—		131.4		—		131.4
Impairment losses	—		—		—		—		—
Net DMS goodwill	131.4		—		131.4		—		131.4
Consolidated goodwill:
Gross goodwill	307.6		—		307.6		65.9		373.5
Impairment losses	—		—		—		—		—
Net consolidated goodwill	$	307.6	$	—	$	307.6	$	65.9	$	373.5

(1) The Residential Heating and Cooling ("RHC") and Custom & Engineered Solutions ("CES") reporting units did not have goodwill in any period presented.

(2) Acquisition adjustments recorded during 2013 for the TECH segment relate to the acquisition of Gefen Distribution and 2GIG. See Note 2, “Acquisitions and Other Investments”.

F - 15

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

The Company accounts for acquired goodwill in accordance with ASC 805 and ASC 350. Under ASC 350, goodwill is not amortized. Instead, it is evaluated for impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently when an event occurs or circumstances change between annual tests that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying value, including, for example, a significant adverse change in the business climate. The Company has set the annual evaluation date as of the first day of its fiscal fourth quarter. The reporting units evaluated for goodwill impairment have been determined to be the same as our operating segments. Only the RESV, DMS and TECH reporting units have goodwill and, therefore, are the only reporting units that currently are required to be evaluated for goodwill impairment.

In 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment (“ASU 2011-8”), which introduced an optional qualitative assessment for testing goodwill impairment. Under ASU 2011-8, if the Company concludes that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds the carrying amount, then the Company is not required to perform the two-step impairment test under ASC 350. The Company adopted ASU 2011-8 in 2011 and used the qualitative assessment approach in connection with the Company's 2012 annual impairment evaluation for the RESV and DMS reporting units, and its 2011 annual impairment evaluation for the RESV, DMS and TECH reporting units. The Company used the quantitative assessment approach in connection with its 2013 annual impairment evaluation for the RESV, TECH and DMS reporting units and its 2012 annual impairment evaluation for the TECH reporting unit. Although the Company does not believe that there are any indicators of goodwill impairment, the Company believes that it is appropriate to periodically perform quantitative analysis of goodwill to provide a basis of support for future qualitative assessments, which is the reason that the Company used the quantitative assessment approach in 2013.

When applicable, the Company utilizes a combination of a discounted cash flow (“DCF”) approach and an EBITDA multiple approach in order to value the Company's reporting units required to be tested for impairment. These non-recurring fair value measurements are primarily determined using unobservable inputs. Accordingly, these fair value measurements are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

The DCF approach requires that the Company forecast future cash flows of the reporting units, and discount those cash flow streams based upon a weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”) that is derived, in part, from comparable companies within similar industries. The DCF calculations also include a terminal value calculation that is based upon an expected long-term growth rate for the applicable reporting unit. The Company believes that its procedures for estimating DCF, including the terminal valuation, are reasonable and consistent with market conditions at the time of estimation.

The EBITDA multiple approach requires that the Company estimate certain valuation multiples of EBITDA derived from comparable companies, and apply those derived EBITDA multiples to the applicable reporting unit's estimated EBITDA for selected EBITDA measurement periods.

2013 Goodwill Impairment Testing

For the 2013 annual impairment test for RESV, DMS and TECH, we estimated the fair value of each of the reporting units using a weighted average of 50% for the DCF approach and 50% for the EBITDA approach, which we determined to be the most representative allocation for the estimate of the long-term fair value of the reporting units. The RESV valuation assumed a taxable transaction while the DMS and TECH valuations each assumed a non-taxable transaction, with WACC’s of 13.2%, 13.4% and 14.5%, respectively, and EBITDA multiples in the range of 7.5x to 8.0x, 6.5x to 7.5x and 7.0x to 8.5x, respectively, for the selected measurement periods of the latest twelve months through September 30, 2013, and forecasted 2013 and 2014. As the estimated fair value of RESV, DMS and TECH was greater than the carrying value, no Step 2 test for goodwill impairment was required. The Company did not prepare updated goodwill impairment analyses as of December 31, 2013 for any reporting unit, as there were no indicators during the quarter that would have required such analysis.

We believe that our assumptions used to estimate the fair value of RESV, DMS and TECH as of the first day of the fourth quarter were reasonable. If different assumptions were used, particularly with respect to estimating future cash flows, weighted average costs of capital, and terminal growth rates, different estimates of fair value may have resulted. The estimated fair values of the RESV, DMS, and TECH reporting units would have to decrease by approximately 50.7%, 39.5%, and 23.8%, respectively, before a potential impairment would be recognized.

F - 16

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

2012 Goodwill Impairment Testing

For the 2012 annual impairment test for RESV and DMS, the Company determined, based on the qualitative analysis performed in accordance with ASU 2011-08, that it was more likely than not that the fair value of each of RESV and DMS was greater than their carrying amounts as of the first day of the fourth quarter. Accordingly, the Company was not required to perform the two-step impairment test under ASC 350 as of that date with respect to these reporting units.

For the 2012 annual impairment test for TECH, we estimated the fair value of the reporting unit using a weighted average of 50% for the DCF approach and 50% for the EBITDA approach, which we determined to be the most representative allocation for the estimate of the long-term fair value of the reporting unit. The TECH valuation assumed a taxable transaction, with a WACC of 16.9%, and EBITDA multiples in the range of 7.5x to 8.5x for the selected measurement periods of the latest twelve months through September 29, 2012, and forecasted 2012 and 2013. As the estimated fair value of TECH was greater than the carrying value, no Step 2 test for goodwill impairment was required.

2011 Goodwill Impairment Testing

In 2011, the Company determined, based on qualitative analysis in accordance with ASU 2011-08, that it was more likely than not that the fair value of each of the three evaluated reporting units was greater than their carrying amounts as of the first day of the fourth quarter. Accordingly, the Company was not required to perform the two-step impairment test under ASC 350 as of that date.

Other Intangible Assets

The table that follows presents the Company's major components of intangible assets as of December 31, 2013 and 2012:

	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Intangible Assets		Weighted Average Remaining Useful Lives
	(Amounts in millions, except for useful lives)
December 31, 2013
Trademarks	$	164.8	$	(30.7	)	$	134.1	16.5
Developed technology	77.0		(23.2		)	53.8		9.0
Customer relationships	562.3		(109.3		)	453.0		13.6
Others	23.4		(15.4		)	8.0		3.4
	$	827.5	$	(178.6	)	$	648.9	13.7
December 31, 2012
Trademarks	$	159.9	$	(23.2	)	$	136.7	18.2
Developed technology	70.3		(16.4		)	53.9		10.3
Customer relationships	488.5		(75.9		)	412.6		15.3
Others	23.5		(11.8		)	11.7		5.4
	$	742.2	$	(127.3	)	$	614.9	15.3

Developed technology, trademarks and customer relationships are amortized on a straight-line basis. Amortization of intangible assets charged to operations amounted to approximately $51.3 million, $44.3 million, and $44.8 million for the three years ended December 31, 2013, respectively.

F - 17

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

As ofDecember 31, 2013, the estimated future intangible asset amortization expense aggregated approximately $648.9 million as follows:

Year Ended December 31,	Annual Amortization Expense
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
2014	$	53.5
2015	53.1
2016	49.6
2017	49.5
2018	49.3
2019 and thereafter	393.9

In accordance with ASC 360, “Property, Plant and Equipment” (“ASC 360”), the Company evaluates the realizability of long-lived assets, which primarily consists of property and equipment and definite lived intangible assets (the “ASC 360 Long-Lived Assets”), when events or business conditions warrant it, as well as whenever an interim goodwill impairment test is required under ASC 350. ASC 350 requires that the ASC 360 impairment test be completed, and any ASC 360 impairment be recorded, prior to performing the goodwill impairment test.

The evaluation of the impairment of long-lived assets, other than goodwill, is based on expectations of non-discounted future cash flows compared to the carrying value of the long-lived asset groups. If the sum of the expected non-discounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the ASC 360 Long-Lived Assets, the Company would recognize an impairment loss if the carrying amount of the asset group exceeds its fair value. The Company's cash flow estimates are based upon future projected cash flows received from subsidiary management in connection with the Company's annual planning and interim forecasting process, and, if appropriate, include a terminal valuation for the applicable subsidiary based upon an EBITDA multiple. The Company estimates the EBITDA multiple by reviewing comparable company information and other industry data. The Company believes that its procedures for estimating gross future cash flows, including the terminal valuation, are reasonable and consistent with current market conditions for each of the dates when impairment testing has been performed.

For the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of approximately $4.3 million within COGS related to the write-down of property and equipment in connection with the exit in the first quarter of 2014 of a product line within the RESV segment. There were no other long-lived asset impairment charges recorded during 2012 or 2011.

4. NOTES, MORTGAGE NOTES AND OBLIGATIONS PAYABLE

Short-term bank obligations

Short-term bank obligations at December 31, 2013 and 2012 consist of the following:

	December 31,
	2013		2012
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Secured lines of credit and bank advances of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries	$	0.7	$	0.7

Short-term bank obligations of the Company's foreign subsidiaries are secured by accounts receivable of the Company's foreign subsidiaries with an aggregate net book value of approximately $0.7 million, and have a weighted average interest rate of approximately 7.8% at December 31, 2013.

F - 18

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

Notes, Mortgage Notes and Obligations Payable

Notes, mortgage notes and obligations payable consist of the following at December 31, 2013 and 2012:

	December 31,
	2013		2012
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
8.5% Senior Notes due 2021, including net premium of approximately $6.3 million      and $8.2 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively	$	741.3	$	743.2
10% Senior Notes due 2018	250.0		250.0
Term Loan Facility, including net discount of approximately $1.3 million and      $1.7 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively	91.7		91.3
ABL Facility	—		—
Mortgage notes payable, including net discounts of approximately $0.1 million and      $0.2 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.	1.6		1.8
Other, including net discounts of approximately $0.4 million and $1.0 million at      December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively	11.5		14.0
	1,096.1		1,100.3
Less amounts included in current liabilities	2.8		2.4
	$	1,093.3	$	1,097.9

8.5% Senior Notes due 2021

The 8.5% Senior Notes due 2021 (the "8.5% Notes") are unconditionally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by each of the Company's current and future domestic restricted subsidiaries (other than receivables subsidiaries, immaterial subsidiaries or non-wholly owned subsidiaries unless such non-wholly owned subsidiary guarantees any credit facilities or any capital market securities of the Company or any guarantor) that guarantee any of the Company's or other restricted subsidiaries' other indebtedness. Interest on the 8.5% Notes accrues at the rate of 8.5% per annum and is payable semi-annually in arrears on April 15 and October 15, until maturity. Interest on the 8.5% Notes accrues from the date of original issuance or, if interest has already been paid, from the date it was most recently paid. Interest is computed on the basis of a 360-day year comprised of twelve 30-day months.

At any time prior to April 15, 2014, the Company may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the 8.5% Notes with the net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings at a redemption price of 108.5% plus accrued and unpaid interest, provided that at least 65% of the original aggregate principal amount of the 8.5% Notes remains outstanding after the redemption and the redemption occurs within 90 days of the date of the closing of such equity offerings. On or after April 15, 2016, the 8.5% Notes are redeemable at the option of the Company, in whole or in part, on or after April 15, 2016 at 104.25%, declining to 102.125% on April 15, 2017, declining to 101.063% on April 15, 2018 and further declining to 100.0% on April 15, 2019.

In addition, at any time and from time to time prior to April 15, 2016, the Company may redeem all or any portion of the 8.5% Notes outstanding at a redemption price equal to (a) 100% of the aggregate principal amount of the 8.5% Notes to be redeemed together with accrued and unpaid interest to such redemption date, plus (b) the “Make Whole Amount”. The “Make Whole Amount” means, with respect to the 8.5% Notes at any redemption date, the greater of (i) 1.0% of the principal amount of the 8.5% Notes and (ii) the excess, if any, of (a) an amount equal to the present value of (1) the redemption price of the 8.5% Notes at April 15, 2016 plus (2) the remaining scheduled interest payments of the 8.5% Notes to be redeemed to April 15, 2016, computed using a discount rate equal to the Treasury Rate plus 50 basis points, over (b) the principal amount of the 8.5% Notes to be redeemed.

The indenture governing the 8.5% Notes contains certain restrictive financial and operating covenants including covenants that restrict, among other things, the payment of cash dividends, the incurrence of additional indebtedness, the making of certain investments, mergers, consolidations and the sale of assets (all as defined in the indenture and other agreements). At December 31,

F - 19

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

2013, the Company's 10% Notes were the most restrictive. As of December 31, 2013, the Company was in compliance with all covenants under the indenture that governs the 8.5% Notes.

10% Senior Notes due 2018

On November 23, 2010, the Company sold $250.0 million principal amount of 10% Senior Notes due December 1, 2018 (the "10% Notes”). The 10% Notes were issued for general corporate purposes, including the acquisition of Ergotron (Note 2, "Acquisitions and Other Investments"), and are unconditionally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by each of the Company's current and future domestic subsidiaries that guarantee its obligations under the ABL Facility. Net proceeds from the sale of the 10% Notes, after deducting underwriting commissions and expenses, amounted to approximately $243.2 million.

Interest on the 10% Notes accrues at the rate of 10% per annum and is payable semi-annually in arrears on June 1 and December 1, until maturity. Interest on the 10% Notes accrues from the date of original issuance or, if interest has already been paid, from the date it was most recently paid. Interest is computed on the basis of a 360-day year comprised of twelve 30-day months.

On or after December 1, 2014 the 10% Notes are redeemable at the option of the Company, in whole or in part, on or after December 1, 2014 at 105.0%, declining to 102.5% on December 1, 2015 and further declining to 100.0% on December 1, 2016.

In addition, at any time and from time to time prior to December 1, 2014, the Company may redeem all or any portion of the 10% Notes outstanding at a redemption price equal to (a) 100% of the aggregate principal amount of the 10% Notes to be redeemed together with accrued and unpaid interest to such redemption date, plus (b) the “Make Whole Amount”. The “Make Whole Amount” means, with respect to the 10% Notes at any redemption date, the greater of (i) 1.0% of the principal amount of the 10% Notes and (ii) the excess, if any, of (a) an amount equal to the present value of (1) the redemption price of the 10% Notes at December 1, 2014 plus (2) the remaining scheduled interest payments of the 10% Notes to be redeemed, computed using a discount rate equal to the Treasury Rate plus 50 basis points, over (b) the principal amount of the 10% Notes to be redeemed.

The indenture governing the 10% Notes contains certain restrictive financial and operating covenants including covenants that restrict, among other things, the payment of cash dividends, the incurrence of additional indebtedness, the making of certain investments, mergers, consolidations and the sale of assets (all as defined in the indenture and other agreements). As of December 31, 2013, the Company had the capacity to make certain payments, including dividends, under the 10% Notes of approximately $55.9 million. As of December 31, 2013, the Company was in compliance with all covenants under the indenture that governs the 10% Notes.

Term Loan and ABL Facilities

On April 26, 2011, the Company entered into a senior secured term loan with a final maturity in 2017 (the "Term Loan Facility"). The remaining principal balance related to the Term Loan Facility is due on April 26, 2017.

The Term Loan Facility provides that the Company may request additional tranches of term loans in an aggregate amount not to exceed $200.0 million. Availability of such additional tranches of term loans will be subject to the absence of any default, a pro forma secured leverage ratio test and, among other things, the receipt of commitments by existing or additional financial institutions.

Loans under the Term Loan Facility bear interest, at the Company's option, at a rate per annum equal to either (1) a base rate (as defined in the credit agreement governing the Term Loan Facility) or (2) a Eurodollar rate (as defined in the credit agreement governing the Term Loan Facility), in each case plus an applicable margin. The weighted average interest rate under the Term Loan Facility at December 31, 2013 was 5.25%.

F - 20

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

The credit agreement governing the Company's Term Loan Facility requires the Company to prepay outstanding term loans, subject to certain exceptions, with:

• 50% (subject to reduction to 25% and 0% based upon the Company's secured leverage ratio) of the Company's annual excess cash flow, commencing with the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012;

• 100% of the net cash proceeds of certain asset sales and casualty and condemnation events, subject to reinvestment rights and certain other exceptions; and

• 100% of the net cash proceeds of any issuance of debt, other than debt permitted under the Term Loan Facility.

As of December 31, 2013, there were no requirements to prepay outstanding amounts under the Term Loan. The Company may also voluntarily prepay outstanding loans at any time without premium or penalty other than customary “breakage” costs with respect to Eurodollar rate loans.

On June 13, 2012, the Company amended and extended its $300.0 million senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility (the “ABL Facility”). The amendment lowered the interest rates and fees payable by Nortek and extended the maturity from December 17, 2015 to June 13, 2017. Additionally, certain provisions of the credit agreement were amended to enhance Nortek's financial and operational flexibility. In conjunction with amending the ABL Facility in June 2012, the Company incurred fees and expenses of approximately $1.2 million which have been included in deferred financing costs and are being recognized over the remaining term of the ABL Facility.

The ABL Facility consists of a $280.0 million U.S. facility (with a $60.0 million sublimit for the issuance of U.S. standby letters of credit and a $20.0 million sublimit for U.S. swingline loans) and a $20.0 million Canadian facility.

There are limitations on the Company’s ability to incur the full $300.0 million of commitments under the ABL Facility. Availability is limited to the lesser of the borrowing base under the ABL Facility and $300.0 million. The borrowing base at any time will equal the sum (subject to certain reserves and other adjustments) of:

• 85% of the net amount of eligible accounts receivable;

• 85% of the net orderly liquidation value of eligible inventory; and

• available cash subject to certain limitations as specified in the ABL Facility.

As ofDecember 31, 2013, there were no outstanding borrowings and approximately $13.4 million in outstanding letters of credit under the ABL Facility. Based on the December 2013 borrowing base calculations, the Company had excess availability of approximately $248.7 million at December 31, 2013.

The interest rates applicable to loans under the ABL Facility are, at the Company’s option, equal to either an adjusted LIBOR rate for a one, two, three or six month interest period (or such period of 365 days or less, if consented to by the relevant lenders) or an alternate base rate, plus an applicable margin percentage ranging from 1.75% to 2.25% for borrowings based on an adjusted LIBOR or Canadian bankers' acceptance rate, and 0.75% to 1.25% for borrowings based on a base or prime rate, depending on the Company’s Average Excess Availability (as defined in the ABL Facility). The alternate base rate, with respect to U.S. Borrowings, will be the greater of (1) the Federal Funds rate plus 0.50%, (2) 1.00% plus the LIBOR rate for a 30 day interest period as determined on such day, or (3) the prime rate. Interest is payable at the end of the selected interest period, but no less frequently than quarterly.

The Company will be required to deposit cash daily from its material deposit accounts (including all concentration accounts) into collection accounts maintained with the administrative agent under the ABL Facility, which will be used to repay outstanding loans and cash collateralized letters of credit, if (i) excess availability (as defined in the ABL Facility) falls below the greater of $30.0 million or 12.5% of the borrowing base or (ii) an event of default has occurred and is continuing. Based on the December 2013 borrowing base calculations, the Company had approximately $215.9 million of excess availability before triggering the cash deposit requirements at December 31, 2013. In addition, under the ABL Facility, if (i) excess availability falls below the greater of $30.0 million or 12.5% of the borrowing base or (ii) an event of default has occurred and is continuing, the Company will be required to satisfy and maintain a consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio measured on a trailing four quarter basis of not less than 1.0 to 1.0. The Company’s ability to meet the required fixed charge coverage ratio can be affected by events beyond its control. A breach of any of these covenants could result in a default under the ABL Facility.

F - 21

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

Additional borrowings under the ABL Facility require the Company and its subsidiaries to make certain customary representations and warranties as of the date of such additional borrowing. In the event that the Company and its subsidiaries are unable to make such representations and warranties on such borrowing date, then the lenders under the ABL Facility may not honor such request for additional borrowing. The ABL Facility also provides the lenders considerable discretion to impose reserves or availability blocks, which could materially impair the amount of borrowings that would otherwise be available to the Company and its subsidiaries and may require the Company to repay certain amounts outstanding under the ABL Facility. There can be no assurance that the lenders under the ABL Facility will not impose such actions during the term of the ABL Facility. 

All obligations under the Company's Term Loan Facility and ABL Facility are unconditionally guaranteed by substantially all existing and future, direct and indirect, wholly-owned domestic (and, in the case of the ABL Facility, Canadian) restricted subsidiaries of the Company. All obligations under the Company's Term Loan Facility and ABL Facility, and the guarantees of those obligations, are secured, subject to certain exceptions, by substantially all of the Company's assets and the assets of the guarantors, including:

• a second-priority security interest in the case of the Term Loan Facility, and a first-priority security interest in the case of the ABL Facility, in personal property consisting of accounts receivable, inventory, cash, deposit accounts, and certain related assets and proceeds of the foregoing; and

• a first-priority security interest in the case of the Term Loan Facility, and a second-priority interest in the case of the ABL Facility, in, and mortgages on, substantially all of the Company's material owned real property and equipment.

The Term Loan Facility and ABL Facility agreements contains certain restrictive financial and operating covenants, including covenants that restrict the Company's ability and the ability of its subsidiaries to complete acquisitions, pay dividends, incur indebtedness or liens, make investments, sell assets and take certain other corporate actions. At December 31, 2013, the Company's 10% Notes were the most restrictive. As ofDecember 31, 2013, the Company was in compliance with all covenants under the agreements that govern the Term Loan Facility and the ABL Facility.

Other Indebtedness

Mortgage notes payable of approximately $1.6 million outstanding atDecember 31, 2013includes various mortgage notes and other related indebtedness payable in installments through 2019. These notes have a weighted average interest rate of approximately2.7% and are collateralized by property and equipment with an aggregate net book value of approximately $4.2 million at December 31, 2013.

Other obligations, including capital leases, of approximately $11.5 million outstanding at December 31, 2013 include borrowings relating to equipment purchases, notes payable issued for acquisitions and other borrowings bearing interest at rates ranging from approximately 5.8% to 18.7% and maturing at various dates through 2020. Approximately $6.8 million of such indebtedness is collateralized by property and equipment with an aggregate net book value of approximately $12.0 million at December 31, 2013.

Fourth Quarter 2012 Debt Transaction

On October 18, 2012, the Company issued $235.0 million aggregate principal amount of 8.5% Senior Notes due 2021 (the "New 8.5% Notes") which were offered as additional notes under the indenture pursuant to which the Company previously issued $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 8.5% Senior Notes due 2021.

The Company received approximately $251.7 million of gross proceeds in connection with the issuance of these notes, which were used to pay down an equal amount of aggregate principal of the Company's Term Loan Facility. The Company used cash on hand to pay accrued interest of approximately $1.8 million related to the Term Loan Facility and to pay underwriting, legal, and accounting fees of approximately $4.7 million related to the issuance of the New 8.5% Notes.

Certain holders of the New 8.5% Notes had previously held loans under our Term Loan Facility up to the time they were paid down. In accordance with ASC 470-50, "Debt Modifications and Extinguishments" (“ASC 470-50”), the Company determined that of the net total of the related Term Loan Facility original issue discounts, New 8.5% Note premiums, underwriting commissions, legal, accounting and other expenses, approximately $6.4 million should be recorded as a loss on debt retirement,

F - 22

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

and approximately $3.9 million and $15.1 million should be recorded as deferred debt expense and debt premium, respectively, and amortized over the life of the New 8.5% Notes.

Second Quarter 2011 Debt Transactions

On April 26, 2011, the Company issued its original 8.5% Notes in an aggregate principal amount of $500.0 million and entered into its Term Loan Facility. The Company received approximately $848.2 million of gross proceeds in connection with the issuance of the Original 8.5% Notes and Term Loan Facility. The Company used approximately $825.0 million of these net proceeds to repurchase or redeem all of the 11% Senior Secured Notes due 2013 (the "11% Notes"), which included approximately $753.3 million of aggregate outstanding principal balance, approximately $37.8 million of tender and redemption premiums and approximately $33.9 million of accrued but unpaid interest. The redemption of the 11% Notes resulted in a pre-tax loss of approximately $33.8 million in the second quarter of 2011.

Scheduled Maturities

At December 31, 2013, the maturities for the Company’s notes, mortgage notes and obligations payable (excluding approximately $4.5 million of net unamortized debt premium) were:

Year Ended December 31,	Debt Obligation Maturities
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
2014	$	3.1
2015	2.9
2016	1.0
2017	94.0
2018	250.7
Thereafter	739.9

F - 23

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

5. EXIT AND DISPOSAL ACTIVITIES

The Company has initiated various exit and disposal activities including, but not limited to, the matters described below. Employee separation expenses are comprised of severance, outplacement and retention bonus payments. Other costs include expenses associated with asset write-downs, terminating contractual arrangements, costs to prepare facilities for closure, and costs to move equipment and products to other facilities.

Manufacturing Rationalization and Relocation Initiative

On March 11, 2013, the Company's Board of Directors approved the following initiatives: (i) construction of two new manufacturing facilities on a campus in Mexico to be shared by the RHC and CES segments, which will provide an integrated manufacturing footprint for both RHC and CES; (ii) consolidation of two North American manufacturing facilities in the RHC segment into the new, shared facility in Mexico; and (iii) transfer of product manufacturing from certain manufacturing facilities in the CES segment to the new, shared campus in Mexico, as well as transferring and expanding parts and sub-assembly operations in Mexico (collectively, the "Manufacturing Rationalization & Relocation Initiative").

The Company expects that the range of total cost to complete the Manufacturing Rationalization & Relocation Initiative is as follows:

	Low		High
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Exit & Disposal Activities (1)	$	18.0	$	21.0
Capital Expenditures	4.0		5.0
	$	22.0	$	26.0

(1) Exit and disposal activities are comprised of the following:

	Low		High
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Machinery and Equipment Relocation & Installation	$	6.5	$	7.5
Employee-related Costs	10.5		11.5
Other Exit Related Costs	1.0		2.0
	$	18.0	$	21.0

Cash expenditures began in the second quarter of 2013 and are expected to continue through fiscal year 2015. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded $8.3 million (of which approximately $7.9 million and $0.4 million was recorded in the RHC and CES segments, respectively) of severance and other costs related to the Manufacturing Rationalization & Relocation Initiative.

F - 24

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

The following table sets forth the changes to the liability for the Manufacturing Rationalization & Relocation Initiative during the year ended December 31, 2013:

	Severance		Other Costs			Total
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Balance, December 31, 2012	$	—	$	—		$	—
Provision	6.3		2.0			8.3
Payments	—		(1.3		)	(1.3		)
Other	—		—			—
Balance, December 31, 2013	$	6.3	$	0.7		$	7.0

Warehousing and Distribution Consolidation

On March 11, 2013, in connection with the Company's efforts to optimize supply chain performance, the Company's Board of Directors also approved entry into a five-year agreement with a third party logistics service provider to outsource certain warehousing and distribution activities in the Company's North American operating segments and facilitate the consolidation of North American warehousing distribution centers (the "Warehousing & Distribution Consolidation"). The Company expects these initiatives to generate cost savings as a result of moving to shared distribution centers and leveraging its scale by optimizing shipments and consolidating facilities.

The Company expects that the range of total cost to complete the Warehousing and Distribution Consolidation is as follows:

	Low		High
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Lease Cancellation Costs	$	1.5	$	2.0
Employee-Related Costs	1.0		1.5
Other Exit Related Costs	2.0		3.0
	$	4.5	$	6.5

The Company expects the Warehousing & Distribution Consolidation costs to be incurred over a 12-month period, which commenced in the third quarter of 2013. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded $1.8 million (of which approximately $1.3 million and $0.5 million was recorded in the TECH and DMS segments, respectively) of severance and other costs related to the Warehousing and Distribution Consolidation.

The following table sets forth the changes to the liability for the Warehousing and Distribution Consolidation during the year ended December 31, 2013:

	Severance			Other Costs			Total
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Balance, December 31, 2012	$	—		$	—		$	—
Provision	1.0			0.8			1.8
Payments	(0.3		)	(0.5		)	(0.8		)
Other	—			—			—
Balance, December 31, 2013	$	0.7		$	0.3		$	1.0

F - 25

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

TECH Segment Combination

The Company has combined, or is in the process of combining, the operations of certain subsidiaries within the TECH segment in order to improve overall operational efficiencies, reduce costs, and provide potential for greater revenue growth (the "TECH Segment Combination").  The total expected costs related to one time termination benefits and other costs associated with the TECH Segment Combination are estimated to be approximately $13.3 million to $13.5 million. In connection with the TECH Segment Combination, the Company has incurred cumulative costs of approximately $13.3 million, consisting of one time termination benefits of approximately $3.5 million, approximately $3.4 million in costs to reduce inventory values for certain products to their expected net realizable amount, and facility exit and other costs of approximately $6.4 million.

The following table sets forth the changes to the liability for the TECH Segment Combination during the year ended December 31, 2013:

	Severance			Other Costs			Total
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Balance, December 31, 2012	$	0.4		$	2.5		$	2.9
Provision	2.1			5.1			7.2
Payments	(1.6		)	(6.7		)	(8.3		)
Other	—			(0.1		)	(0.1		)
Balance, December 31, 2013	$	0.9		$	0.8		$	1.7

Best Restructuring

In 2011, management approved a plan to reduce costs and improve production efficiencies at Best, one of the Company's RESV subsidiaries, including transferring certain operations from Italy to Poland (the "Best Restructuring"). The total expected costs related to contractual termination benefits and other costs associated with the Best Restructuring are estimated to be approximately $17.3 million. In connection with the Best Restructuring, the Company has incurred cumulative costs through December 31, 2013 of approximately $17.3 million, consisting of contractual termination benefits of approximately $16.9 million and other costs of approximately $0.4 million.

The following table sets forth the changes to the liability for the Best Restructuring during the year ended December 31, 2013:

	Severance (1)			Other Costs		Total
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Balance, December 31, 2012	$	9.1		$	—	$	9.1
Provision	(0.2		)	—		(0.2		)
Payments	(3.7		)	—		(3.7		)
Other	0.3			—		0.3
Balance, December 31, 2013	$	5.5		$	—	$	5.5

(1) Remaining severance is expected to be paid in 2014.

F - 26

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

Summary of Exit and Disposal Activities

The following table outlines amounts recorded within the consolidated statement of operations associated with the Company's exit and disposal activities for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011:

	For the year ended December 31,
	2013								2012						2011
	SG&A		COGS			Total			SG&A		COGS		Total		SG&A		COGS		Total
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Manufacturing Rationalization &      Relocation Initiative	$	—	$	8.3		$	8.3		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Warehousing & Distribution      Consolidation	0.1		1.7			1.8			—		—		—		—		—		—
TECH Segment Combination	5.3		1.9			7.2			3.7		2.4		6.1		—		—		—
Best Restructuring	—		(0.2		)	(0.2		)	—		1.8		1.8		1.3		14.4		15.7
Other	—		—			—			—		1.2		1.2		1.6		0.7		2.3
Total	$	5.4	$	11.7		$	17.1		$	3.7	$	5.4	$	9.1	$	2.9	$	15.1	$	18.0

6. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company provides accruals for all direct costs, including legal costs, associated with the estimated resolution of contingencies at the earliest date at which it is deemed probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of such liability can be reasonably estimated. Costs accrued are estimated based upon an analysis of potential results, assuming a combination of litigation and settlement strategies and outcomes. Legal costs for other than probable contingencies are expensed when services are performed.

Lease Obligations

AtDecember 31, 2013, the Company is obligated under operating lease agreements for the rental of certain real estate and machinery and equipment used in its operations. At December 31, 2013, future minimum rental obligations aggregated approximately $66.7 million and are payable as follows:

Year Ended December 31,	Future Minimum Rental Obligations
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
2014	$	20.1
2015	13.8
2016	10.1
2017	7.9
2018	5.0
Thereafter	9.8

Certain of these lease agreements provide for increased payments based on changes in the consumer price index. Under certain of these lease agreements, the Company or its subsidiaries are also obligated to pay insurance and taxes.

Rental expense charged to continuing operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations was approximately $32.7 million, $34.3 million and $31.2 million for 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

F - 27

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

Indemnifications

The Company has indemnified third parties for certain matters in a number of transactions involving dispositions of former subsidiaries.  The Company has recorded liabilities in relation to these indemnifications of approximately $5.1 million and $5.3 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, of which approximately $2.4 million and $2.3 million, respectively, are recorded in accrued expenses and approximately $2.7 million and $3.0 million, respectively, are recorded in other long-term liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.  At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the undiscounted future payments related to these indemnifications were estimated to be approximately $5.4 million and $5.7 million, respectively.

Product Warranty and Recall Reserves

The Company sells a number of products and offers a number of warranties including, in some instances, extended warranties for which the Company receives proceeds.  The specific terms and conditions of these warranties vary depending on the product sold and the country in which the product is sold.  The Company estimates the costs that may be incurred under its warranties, with the exception of extended warranties, and records a liability for such costs at the time of sale.  Deferred revenue from extended warranties is recorded at estimated fair value and is amortized over the life of the warranty and periodically reviewed to ensure that the amount recorded is equal to or greater than estimated future costs.  Factors that affect the Company’s warranty liability include the number of units sold, historical and anticipated rates of warranty claims, cost per claim, and new product introductions.  The Company periodically assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty claims and adjusts the amounts as necessary.

Changes in the Company’s combined short-term and long-term warranty liabilities during 2013 and 2012 are as follows:

	December 31,
	2013			2012
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Balance, beginning of period	$	54.7		$	56.3
Warranties provided during period (1)	27.8			22.9
Settlements made during period	(27.5		)	(27.2		)
Changes in liability estimate, including      expirations and acquisitions	1.8			2.7
Balance, end of period	$	56.8		$	54.7

(1) Includes additional warranties provided within the TECH segment of approximately $3.4 million related to a product safety recall and other warranty matters and additional warranties of approximately $6.5 million within the CES segment related to a certain warranty matter.

The Company has undertaken several voluntary product recalls and reworks over the past several years. Additional product recalls and reworks could result in material future costs. Many of the Company's products, especially certain models of bath fans, range hoods, and residential furnaces and air conditioners, have a large installed base, and any recalls or reworks related to such products could be particularly costly. The costs of product recalls or reworks are not generally covered by insurance. Recalls or reworks may adversely affect the Company's reputation as a manufacturer of high-quality, safe products and could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Other Commitments and Contingencies

The Company is subject to other contingencies, including legal proceedings and claims, arising out of its businesses that cover a wide range of matters including, among others, environmental matters, contract and employment claims, product liability, warranty, and modification and adjustment or replacement of component parts of units sold, which include product recalls. Product liability, environmental and other legal proceedings also include matters with respect to businesses previously owned. The Company has used various substances in its products and manufacturing operations which have been or may be deemed to be hazardous or dangerous, and the extent of its potential liability, if any, under environmental, product liability and workers' compensation statutes, rules, regulations and case law is unclear. Furthermore, due to the lack of adequate information and the

F - 28

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

potential impact of present regulations and any future regulations, there are certain circumstances in which the amount or range of possible losses cannot be reasonably estimated.

While it is impossible to ascertain the ultimate legal and financial liability with respect to contingent liabilities, including lawsuits, warranty, product liability, environmental liabilities, and product recalls, the Company believes that the aggregate amount of such liabilities, if any, in excess of amounts provided or covered by insurance, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity. It is possible, however, that results of operations for any particular future period could be materially affected by changes in the Company's assumptions or strategies related to these contingencies or changes that are not within the Company's control.

7. ACCRUED EXPENSES AND TAXES AND OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES

Accrued expenses and taxes included in current liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet, consist of the following atDecember 31, 2013and2012:

	December 31,
	2013		2012
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Payroll, pension and employee benefits	$	67.9	$	56.1
Product liability reserves	8.1		10.4
Worker's compensation reserves	2.5		2.2
Other insurance reserves, including employee health benefit accruals	4.7		4.9
Interest	16.1		16.2
Exit and disposal activities	12.2		8.7
Product warranty	30.4		27.1
Sales and marketing expenditures	28.3		25.2
Other, net	61.3		48.1
	$	231.5	$	198.9

Accrued expenses included in other long-term liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet, consist of the following atDecember 31, 2013and2012:

	December 31,
	2013		2012
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Employee pension retirement benefit obligation	$	43.0	$	60.5
Product warranty	26.4		27.6
Post-retirement health benefit obligations	1.6		1.9
Product liability reserves	40.2		43.6
Worker's compensation reserves	0.2		0.8
Other insurance reserves	3.7		4.1
Exit and disposal activities	3.0		3.3
Mexico facility (see Note 16)	33.6		—
Uncertain tax positions	24.9		29.2
Other, net	12.3		15.9
	$	188.9	$	186.9

F - 29

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

8. INCOME TAXES

The following is a summary of the components of (loss) earnings before (benefit) provision for income taxes for the periods presented:

	For the year ended December 31,
	2013			2012		2011
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Domestic	$	(31.8	)	$	0.2	$	(68.8	)
Foreign	20.4			24.6		(7.4		)
	$	(11.4	)	$	24.8	$	(76.2	)

The following is a summary of the (benefit) provision for income taxes included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the periods presented:

	For the year ended December 31,
	2013			2012		2011
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Federal income taxes:
Current	$	0.3		$	0.6	$	0.3
Deferred	(3.5		)	3.3		(20.8		)
	(3.2		)	3.9		(20.5		)
Foreign	6.4			8.2		6.4
State	(6.3		)	3.2		(6.2		)
	$	(3.1	)	$	15.3	$	(20.3	)

Included in the state provision above is a deferred benefit of approximately $4.2 million in 2013, a deferred provision of approximately $1.0 million in 2012, and a deferred benefit of approximately $8.3 million in 2011. There is no significant foreign deferred tax provision in any of these years.

Income tax payments, net of refunds, for 2013 and 2012 were approximately $12.2 million and $5.9 million, respectively. Net income taxes refunded during 2011 were approximately $4.6 million.

F - 30

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

The following table reconciles the federal statutory income tax (benefit) provision and rate to the actual income tax (benefit) provision and related effective tax rate for the periods presented:

	For the year ended December 31,
	2013					2012					2011
	$			%		$			%		$			%
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Income tax at the federal statutory rate	$	(4.0	)	35.0	%	$	8.7		35.0	%	$	(26.7	)	35.0	%
Net change from federal statutory rate:
Change in valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets	5.3			(46.5	)	6.2			24.9		14.8			(19.4	)
Change in uncertain tax positions, including interest	(1.5		)	13.2		0.3			1.1		0.3			(0.4	)
State income tax, net of federal income tax effect	(4.1		)	35.9		2.1			8.4		(4.0		)	5.3
Tax effect resulting from foreign activities and foreign dividends	0.5			(4.3	)	(3.3		)	(13.4	)	(4.2		)	5.5
Non-deductible expenses	0.9			(7.9	)	2.3			9.4		1.5			(1.9	)
Research credits	(1.8		)	15.8		(1.7		)	(6.7	)	(1.7		)	2.2
Other, net	1.6			(14.0	)	0.7			3.0		(0.3		)	0.3
	$	(3.1	)	27.2	%	$	15.3		61.7	%	$	(20.3	)	26.6	%

The tax effect of temporary differences which give rise to significant portions of deferred income tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 are as follows:

	December 31,
	2013			2012
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Deferred Tax Assets (Liabilities) (classified current)
Arising From:
Accounts receivable	$	3.9		$	4.0
Inventories	(0.6		)	(0.9		)
Insurance reserves	2.5			2.8
Warranty accruals	10.7			9.3
Valuation allowances	(6.3		)	(5.8		)
Net loss and credit carry forwards	1.3			5.9
Other reserves and assets, net	18.2			14.0
	$	29.7		$	29.3
Deferred Income Tax Assets (Liabilities) (classified non-current)
Arising From:
Property and equipment, net	$	(14.1	)	$	(19.3	)
Intangible assets, net	(227.7		)	(209.2		)
Pension and other benefit accruals	12.6			20.2
Insurance reserves	15.4			14.2
Warranty accruals	9.9			10.3
Net loss and credit carry forwards	47.9			40.2
Other reserves and assets, net	6.8			12.1
Valuation allowance	(39.9		)	(36.4		)
Tax deductible goodwill	30.0			35.2
	$	(159.1	)	$	(132.7	)

F - 31

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

The total deferred tax assets for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were approximately $159.2 million and $168.2 million, respectively. The total deferred tax liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were approximately $242.4 million and $229.4 million, respectively. The total valuation allowance for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were approximately $46.2 million and $42.2 million, respectively.

 As of December 31, 2009, as a result of income and related deferred tax liabilities recognized through fresh-start accounting, the Company determined that a valuation allowance was no longer required for most of its domestic deferred tax assets. The Company has sufficient reversing deferred tax liabilities available so that it is more likely than not that its federal deferred tax assets will be realized. The Company continues to maintain a valuation allowance for certain foreign net operating loss carryforwards, state net operating loss carryforwards, deferred state tax assets and for certain federal deferred tax assets that, if recognized, would result in capital losses. The increase in valuation allowance for 2013 relates to losses of certain foreign subsidiaries and losses in certain domestic jurisdictions. The Company has determined, based on the history of losses at these subsidiaries, and expectations for the future, a valuation allowance is required for these loss carry-forwards since it is more likely than not that these loss carry-forwards will not be realized.

At December 31, 2013, the Company has not provided United States income taxes or foreign withholding taxes on unremitted foreign earnings of approximately $45.0 million, as those amounts are considered indefinitely invested. Due to the complexities of the U.S. tax law, including the effect of U.S. foreign tax credits, it is not practicable to estimate the amount of tax that might be payable on these earnings in the event they no longer are indefinitely reinvested. The Company has provided United States income taxes and foreign withholding taxes on approximately $24.7 million of unremitted foreign earnings which are not indefinitely invested.

The Company has federal net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $7.0 million which will begin to expire in 2031 and approximately $2.5 million of federal research credit carryforwards that begin to expire in 2030. Included as part of the net operating loss and research credit carry forward are approximately $13.7 million related to the deductions for share-based compensation in excess of the corresponding book expense. The tax benefits of approximately $4.8 million related to these deductions will be recognized as a credit to additional paid in capital when the benefits are realized on a tax return. The Company accounts for excess stock compensation deductions on the basis that these are the last tax benefits that are utilized.

The federal net operating loss carry forward includes approximately $4.0 million that was acquired in connection with the acquisition of 2GIG.

The Company has state net operating losses in various jurisdictions which will begin to expire in 2015.

The Company has approximately $96.0 million of foreign net operating loss carry-forwards that, if utilized, would offset future foreign tax payments. Approximately $85.2 million of these foreign net operating losses have an indefinite carry-forward period and the remaining foreign net operating losses will expire at various times beginning in 2017. The Company has recorded a full valuation allowance against these losses.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits for the years endedDecember 31, 2013 and 2012 is as follows:

	December 31,
	2013			2012
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Balance at January 1,	$	34.5		$	34.2
Gross increases related to positions taken in the current year	4.1			1.9
Gross increases related to positions taken in prior periods	1.6			—
Increases related to acquisitions	0.2			—
Decreases related to settlements with taxing authorities	(2.3		)	—
Decreases due to lapse of statutes of limitation related to state tax and foreign items	(4.3		)	(1.6		)
Decreases related to positions taken in the current year	$	(1.2	)	$	—
Balance at December 31,	$	32.6		$	34.5

F - 32

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

As of January 1, 2013, the Company had a liability of approximately $26.4 million for unrecognized tax benefits related to various federal, foreign and state income tax matters.  The liability for uncertain tax positions at December 31, 2013 was approximately $22.8 million. The liability for uncertain tax positions is included in other long-term liabilities on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The corresponding amount of gross uncertain tax benefits was approximately $32.6 million and $34.5 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

During 2013, the Company increased the reserve for uncertain tax positions related to uncertainties surrounding the timing of deductions related to intercompany transactions with foreign affiliates. This item resulted in an increase of approximately $1.8 million in uncertain tax positions, with a corresponding increase in deferred tax assets of approximately $1.8 million. The increases in the liability for uncertain tax positions also include $0.8 million related to the audit of one of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries, discussed below.

During the first quarter of 2013, the Company reached a settlement related to certain state income tax matters.  As a result, the Company settled total uncertain tax positions of approximately $2.3 million and related interest of approximately $0.8 million for approximately $0.7 million.  The settlement resulted in a tax benefit in the first quarter of 2013 of approximately $1.6 million, net of related federal tax effect.

During the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company recorded a benefit of approximately $2.1 million related to the expiration of the statute of limitations in connection with an uncertain tax position that related to periods prior to the acquisition of Ergotron. This uncertain tax position was subject to an indemnification claim from the seller. As a result, the corresponding indemnification asset was written-off as part of SG&A in the fourth quarter of 2013.

As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the Company's effective tax rate is approximately $12.8 million and $14.6 million, respectively. The difference between the total amount of uncertain tax positions and the amount that would affect the effective tax rate represents the federal tax effect of state tax items, items that offset temporary differences, and items that will result in a reduction of other tax assets.

As of December 31, 2013, the Company had approximately $3.9 million in unrecognized benefits relating to various tax issues, for which the statute of limitations is expected to expire in 2014.

As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the total amount of accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions was approximately $2.1 million and $2.8 million, respectively.  In 2013, the Company has recorded a benefit of approximately $0.3 million as part of its 2013 tax provision related to a net reduction in interest on uncertain tax positions. The Company has included a provision of approximately $0.5 million as part of its 2012 tax provision related to an increase of interest on uncertain tax positions. The Company has included a benefit of approximately $0.6 million as part of its 2011 tax provision related to a reduction of interest on uncertain tax positions. The Company accounts for interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as part of its provision for federal and state taxes.

The Company's consolidated federal tax return has been audited through the period ended December 31, 2009. The Company's state and foreign tax filings generally remain open to examination by the relevant tax authority for the tax years 2009 through 2012. One of the Company's foreign subsidiaries is currently under audit for the years 2007 - 2012. In connection with this audit, the Company has recorded a liability of approximately $0.8 million for potential income tax liabilities and approximately $0.7 million for additional VAT liabilities.

F - 33

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

9. SEGMENT INFORMATION AND CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK

The Company is a global, diversified company whose many market-leading brands deliver broad capabilities and a wide array of innovative, technology-driven products and solutions for lifestyle improvement at home and at work. The Company's fivereporting segments are as follows:

• the Residential Ventilation (“RESV”) segment,

• the Technology Solutions (“TECH”) segment,

• the Display Mount Solutions ("DMS") segment,

• the Residential Heating and Cooling (“RHC”) segment, and

• the Custom & Engineered Solutions (“CES”) segment.

Through these segments the Company manufactures and sells, primarily in the United States, Canada, and Europe, with additional manufacturing in China and Mexico, a wide variety of products for the remodeling and replacement markets, the residential and commercial new construction markets, the manufactured housing market, and the personal and enterprise computer markets.

The Company's performance is significantly impacted by the levels of residential remodeling and replacement activity, as well as the levels of new residential and non-residential construction. The level of new construction activity and, to a lesser extent, the level of residential remodeling and replacement activity are affected by seasonality and cyclical factors such as interest rates, inflation, consumer spending, employment levels, and other macroeconomic factors, over which the Company has no control. Performance in any particular period could be impacted by the timing of sales to certain large customers.

The RESV segment primarily manufactures and sells room and whole house ventilation and other products, primarily for the professional remodeling and replacement markets, the residential new construction market, and the do-it-yourself market. The principal products sold by this segment include kitchen range hoods, exhaust fans (such as bath fans and fan, heater and light combination units), and indoor air quality products.

The TECH segment manufactures and distributes a broad array of products designed to provide convenience and security for residential and certain commercial applications. The principal product categories sold in this segment include audio/video distribution and control equipment, and security and access control products.

The DMS segment manufactures and distributes a broad array of products designed with ergonomic features including wall mounts, desk mounts, arms, carts, workstations, and stands that attach to or support a variety of display devices such as computer monitors, notebook computers, and flat panel displays.

The RHC segment manufactures and sells heating, ventilating, and air conditioning systems for site-built residential and manufactured housing structures, and certain commercial markets. The principal products sold by the segment are split-system and packaged air conditioners and heat pumps, air handlers, furnaces, and related equipment.

The CES segment manufactures and sells custom-designed and engineered heating, ventilating and air conditioning products and systems that meet customer specifications. The principal products sold by the segment are air handlers and large custom rooftop cooling and heating products.

Sales of the Company’s kitchen range hoods and exhaust fans within the RESV segment accounted for approximately 10.7% and 9.8%, respectively, of consolidated net sales for 2013, approximately 11.6% and 10.0%, respectively, of consolidated net sales in 2012 and approximately 11.9% and 9.2%, respectively, of consolidated net sales in 2011. Sales of the Company’s commercial air handlers within the CES segment accounted for approximately 15.4%, 14.6% and 11.4% of consolidated net sales in2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Sales of the Company's digital display mounting and mobility products within the DMS segment accounted for approximately 12.0%, 12.9% and 12.7% of consolidated net sales in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Sales of products sold in the RHC segment accounted for approximately 18.1%, 17.3% and 17.7% of consolidated net sales in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. No other single product class accounts for 10% or more of consolidated net sales.

F - 34

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies”. The Company evaluates segment performance based on operating earnings before allocations of corporate overhead costs. Intersegment net sales and intersegment eliminations are not material for any of the periods presented. The financial statement impact of all acquisition accounting adjustments, including intangible assets amortization and goodwill, are reflected in the applicable operating segment, which are the Company’s reporting units. Unallocated assets consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, prepaid and deferred income taxes, deferred debt expense and long-term restricted investments and marketable securities.

Net sales, operating earnings (loss) and (loss) earnings before (benefit) provision for income taxes for the Company’s reporting segments for the three years ended December 31, 2013 were as follows:

	For the year ended December 31,
	2013			2012			2011
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Net sales:
RESV	$	600.5		$	598.3		$	591.2
TECH	526.9			422.7			455.2
DMS	274.5			284.6			280.6
RHC	415.2			381.8			378.6
CES	470.8			513.9			434.9
Consolidated net sales	$	2,287.9		$	2,201.3		$	2,140.5
Operating earnings (loss):
RESV	$	63.1		$	73.3		$	32.6
TECH	7.6			14.2			35.4
DMS	38.2			33.1			22.2
RHC	13.1			8.5			1.4
CES	26.2			42.9			12.0
Subtotal	148.2			172.0			103.6
Executive retirement	—			—			(8.7		)
Unallocated, net	(60.3		)	(44.4		)	(31.8		)
Consolidated operating earnings	87.9			127.6			63.1
Interest expense	(99.4		)	(96.5		)	(105.6		)
Loss from debt retirement	—			(6.4		)	(33.8		)
Investment income	0.1			0.1			0.1
(Loss) earnings before (benefit) provision for income taxes	$	(11.4	)	$	24.8		$	(76.2	)

F - 35

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

Depreciation expense, amortization expense and capital expenditures for the Company’s segments are presented in the table that follows for the periods presented:

	For the year ended December 31,
	2013		2012		2011
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Depreciation Expense:
RESV	$	12.0	$	13.7	$	13.6
TECH	6.8		4.4		5.4
DMS	4.8		5.3		4.0
RHC	9.0		8.9		11.6
CES	6.9		6.0		6.4
Unallocated	1.1		0.2		0.2
Consolidated depreciation expense	$	40.6	$	38.5	$	41.2
Amortization expense:
RESV (1)	$	15.4	$	15.3	$	15.3
TECH (2)	20.0		10.2		10.1
DMS (3)	12.9		12.1		20.2
RHC (4)	0.8		1.7		1.2
CES	5.5		5.9		5.9
Unallocated	—		—		—
Consolidated amortization expense	$	54.6	$	45.2	$	52.7
Capital Expenditures:
RESV	$	7.6	$	5.7	$	4.9
TECH	10.5		4.2		3.4
DMS	3.5		4.5		5.1
RHC	6.1		1.4		2.6
CES	11.0		6.5		5.0
Unallocated (5)	5.2		2.7		0.1
Consolidated capital expenditures	$	43.9	$	25.0	$	21.1

(1) Includes an increase to cost of goods sold for inventory acquired in business combinations of approximately $0.2 million for 2013.

(2) Includes an increase to cost of goods sold for inventory acquired in business combinations of approximately $3.1 million (related to the acquisition of 2GIG) and $0.2 million for 2013 and 2011, respectively.

(3) Includes an increase to cost of goods sold for inventory acquired in business combinations of approximately $7.3 million for 2011.

(4) Includes an increase to cost of goods sold for inventory acquired in business combinations of approximately $0.9 million and $0.4 million for 2012 and 2011, respectively.

(5) Includes capital expenditures financed under capital leases of approximately $0.1 million and $0.9 million for 2013 and 2012, respectively.

F - 36

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

Segment assets at December 31, 2013 and 2012 for the Company’s reporting segments are presented in the table that follows:

	December 31, 2013		December 31, 2012
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Segment Assets:
RESV	$	610.7	$	647.0
TECH	476.6		313.3
DMS	378.4		393.4
RHC	175.0		134.5
CES	199.0		189.5
	1,839.7		1,677.7
Unallocated:
Cash and cash equivalents, including current restricted cash	83.8		144.9
Deferred tax assets	29.7		29.3
Other assets, including long-term restricted investments and marketable securities	37.7		36.2
Consolidated assets	$	1,990.9	$	1,888.1

Foreign net sales were approximately 16.5%, 18.8%, and 19.7% of consolidated net sales for 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. Foreign net sales are attributed based on the location of the Company’s subsidiary responsible for the sale. Excluding financial instruments and deferred income taxes, foreign long-lived assets were approximately 9.3% and 10.4% of consolidated long-lived assets at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The Company operates internationally and is exposed to market risks from changes in foreign exchange rates. Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk, consist principally of temporary cash investments and trade receivables. The Company places its temporary cash investments with high credit quality financial institutions and limits the amount of credit exposure to any one financial institution. Concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade receivables are limited due to the large number of customers comprising the Company’s customer base and their dispersion across many different geographical regions. These risks are not significantly dissimilar among the Company’s five reporting segments. Accounts receivable from customers related to foreign operations was approximately 20.0% and 25.0% of total accounts receivable at December 31, 2013 and2012, respectively.

No single customer accounts for 10% or more of consolidated net sales or accounts receivable.

F - 37

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

10. EQUITY ACTIVITY

The authorized capital stock of Nortek consists of 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a $0.01 per share par value, none of which were issued or outstanding at December 31, 2013 and 2012, and 90,000,000 shares of common stock with a $0.01 per share par value, of which 15,419,601 shares and 15,298,465 shares were outstanding at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Other Stock Transactions

In connection with the emergence from bankruptcy in 2009, Nortek issued warrants that may be exercised for a period of five years to purchase 789,474 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $52.80 per share. During 2013 and 2012, approximately 46,837 and 96,444 warrants were exercised for shares of Nortek's common stock primarily through net share settlements as permitted under the warrant agreement. There were no warrants exercised during 2011.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Comprehensive income (loss) includes net earnings (loss), unrealized gains and losses from foreign currency translation, and pension liability adjustments, net of tax attributes. The components of the Company’s comprehensive income (loss) and the effect on earnings for the periods presented are detailed in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).

The balances of each component, net of tax attributes, within accumulated other comprehensive loss for the three years ended 2013 are as follows:

	Foreign Currency Translation			Pension Liability Adjustment			Total Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Balance, December 31, 2010	$	2.3		$	(1.5	)	$	0.8
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications	(1.6		)	(19.8		)	(21.4		)
Amounts reclassified from AOCI to SG&A (1)	—			(0.2		)	(0.2		)
Net other comprehensive income (loss), December 31, 2011	(1.6		)	(20.0		)	(21.6		)
Balance, December 31, 2011	$	0.7		$	(21.5	)	$	(20.8	)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications	1.4			(3.3		)	(1.9		)
Amounts reclassified from AOCI to SG&A (1)	—			0.4			0.4
Net other comprehensive income (loss), December 31, 2012	1.4			(2.9		)	(1.5		)
Balance, December 31, 2012	$	2.1		$	(24.4	)	$	(22.3	)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications	(3.0		)	8.3			5.3
Amounts reclassified from AOCI to SG&A (1)	—			0.7			0.7
Net other comprehensive income (loss), December 31, 2013	(3.0		)	9.0			6.0
Balance, December 31, 2013	$	(0.9	)	$	(15.4	)	$	(16.3	)

(1) For additional information, see Note 13, "Pension, Profit Sharing and & Other Post-Retirement Benefits".

F - 38

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

11. (LOSS) EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings (loss) per share amounts are computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.  Diluted earnings (loss) per share amounts are computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and dilutive potential common shares outstanding during each period.

The reconciliations between basic and diluted (loss) earnings per share for the three years ended December 31, 2013 are as follows:

	For the year ended December 31,
	2013			2012		2011
	(Dollar amounts in millions, except per share data)
Net (loss) earnings	$	(8.3	)	$	9.5	$	(55.9	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding	15,371,932			15,152,286		15,122,976
Dilutive effect of common share equivalents	—			378,919		—
Dilutive shares outstanding	15,371,932			15,531,205		15,122,976
Basic (loss) earnings per share	$	(0.54	)	$	0.63	$	(3.70	)
Diluted (loss) earnings per share	$	(0.54	)	$	0.61	$	(3.70	)

The effect of certain potential common share equivalents, as outlined below, were excluded from the computation of diluted shares outstanding for 2013, 2012 and 2011 as their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. Restricted stock awards which vest based upon achievement of performance targets were excluded from the diluted shares outstanding as the performance targets had not been met as of the end of 2013, 2012 and 2011.

A summary of the weighted average anti-dilutive shares excluded from each of the three years ended December 31, 2013 is as follows:

	For the year ended December 31,
	2013	2012	2011
Warrants	652,048	777,419	789,474
Restricted stock	501,021	299,924	400,242
Stock options	669,942	27,774	641,552
Total	1,823,011	1,105,117	1,831,268

F - 39

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

12. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

Incentive Compensation Plan

On December 17, 2009, the Company established the 2009 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Incentive Plan”) which allows for grants of options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, other stock-based awards and performance-based compensation awards. The Incentive Plan is administered by the Board of Directors, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, or any other committee designated by the Board of Directors to administer the Incentive Plan (the “Committee”). Participants consist of such employees, directors and other individuals providing services to the Company, or any subsidiary or affiliate, as the Committee in its sole discretion determines and whom the Committee may designate from time to time to receive awards.

Under the 2009 Plan, 2,885,907 shares were authorized for grant through December 17, 2019, of which 1,076,555 may be in the form of incentive stock options. The maximum number of shares for which options and stock appreciation rights may be granted to any participant in any calendar year is 627,990, and the maximum number of shares with respect to other awards denominated in shares in any calendar year is 627,990. The maximum value of cash payable with respect to awards denominated in cash or property that may be granted to any participant in any plan year is $5.0 million, subject to certain adjustments as defined. In the event that any outstanding award expires, is forfeited, canceled or otherwise terminated without the issuance of shares or is otherwise settled for cash, the shares subject to such award shall again be available for awards. AtDecember 31, 2013, there are 1,249,317 remaining shares available for grant under the Incentive Plan.

Stock Options

The Company has awarded options with time based vesting to certain key employees. These options vest annually, on the anniversary of the date of grant, over three or five years provided the recipient remains employed by the Company. All options expire on the tenth anniversary of the grant date, unless terminated earlier.

The following table summarizes the Company's common stock option transactions for the three years ended December 31, 2013.

	Number of Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in millions)
Outstanding, December 31, 2010	780,981		$	18.10
Granted	210,000		26.82
Exercised	(28,928	)	17.50			$	0.7
Forfeited	(244,937	)	17.50
Canceled	(2,250	)	17.50
Outstanding, December 31, 2011	714,866		$	20.89
Granted	116,119		42.69
Exercised	(143,652	)	17.50			$	6.4
Forfeited	(27,000	)	17.50
Outstanding, December 31, 2012	660,333		$	25.60
Granted	85,930		72.42
Exercised	(74,430	)	20.62			$	3.7
Forfeited	(41,153	)	29.61
Outstanding, December 31, 2013	630,680		$	32.31	7.5
Options vested and exercisable as of December 31, 2013	275,011		$	24.93	7.1	$	13.7	(1)
Remaining options expected to vest as of December 31, 2013	332,718		$	37.98	8.1	$	12.2	(1)

F - 40

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

(1) The aggregate intrinsic value of options represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the estimated fair value of the Company's stock on December 31, 2013 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on December 31, 2013. This amount changes based upon the fair market value of the Company's common stock.

The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted was approximately $28.27, $17.66 and $11.37 during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

The estimated fair value of the options granted was measured on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:

	December 31,
	2013	2012	2011
Risk-Free Interest Rate	0.77%	1.16%	1.37%
Expected Term	6 years	6.6 years	6.50 years
Expected Volatility	40.0%	40.0%	40.7%
Expected Dividend Yield	—%	—%	—%

The risk-free interest rate for periods within the life of the option is based upon a blend of U.S. Treasury bond rates with maturities equal to the expected term of the options. Commencing with grants made in December 2011, the expected term assumption was derived using the simplified method, as described in SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 14.D.2, "Share-Based Payment - Certain Assumptions Used in Valuation Methods". This change in estimation methodology did not have a material impact on the resulting estimated fair value of options granted. The expected volatility assumption is based upon the historical volatility of comparable public companies’ stock as well as the implied volatility of outstanding options for the comparable companies that had such options. The dividend yield represents the expected dividends on the Company's common stock for the expected term of the option.

As of December 31, 2013, there was approximately $4.2 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options granted under the Incentive Plan. This cost is expected to be recognized on a straight-line basis over a weighted average period of approximately 2.2 years. Total compensation expense related to stock options was approximately $2.2 million, $1.3 million and $0.4 million for the three years endedDecember 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The related tax benefit recognized for 2013 and 2012 totaled approximately $0.8 million and $0.3 million, respectively. There was no tax benefit recorded for 2011.

Restricted Stock

The Company has awarded performance based restricted shares of common stock to certain key employees. These shares are eligible to become vested in annual installments based upon the achievement of specified levels of Adjusted EBITDA, as defined, for each year. The shares, if any, are vested as of December 31 of each year. However, as the number of shares vesting is contingent upon the Company's financial results, determined based upon the issuance of audited financial statements, the actual issuance of shares to recipients does not occur until the first quarter of the following year.

The Company has also awarded time-based restricted shares of common stock to certain key employees. These shares vest annually, on the anniversary of the date of grant, over three or five years provided the recipient remains employed by the Company.

Restricted stock has the same cash dividend and voting rights as other common stock and, once issued, is considered to be legally issued and outstanding (even when unvested). Recipients of restricted stock are entitled to receive dividends when and if the Company pays a cash dividend on its common stock. Such dividends are payable to the recipient only upon the vesting of the related restricted shares.

F - 41

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

The following table summarizes the Company's restricted stock activity for the years ended December 31:

	Time-Based				Performance-Based
	Number of Shares		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value		Number of Shares		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested, December 31, 2010	��		$	—	526,220		$	11.29
Granted	105,616		29.04		—		—
Vested	—		—		(500	)	10.85
Forfeited / Canceled	(5,000	)	35.98		(259,484	)	11.29
Unvested, December 31, 2011	100,616		$	28.70	266,236		$	11.29
Granted	55,870		42.08		184,192		52.71
Vested	(26,865	)	29.33		(47,120	)	29.20
Forfeited / Canceled	(1,342	)	37.32		(30,809	)	14.93
Unvested, December 31, 2012	128,279		$	34.30	372,499		$	29.20
Granted	51,465		72.45		98,018		72.46
Vested	(43,514	)	35.68		(121,794	)	40.75
Forfeited / Canceled	(16,911	)	46.64		(133,007	)	43.89
Unvested, December 31, 2013	119,319		$	48.50	215,716		$	60.76

The aggregate fair value of shares vesting during the years endedDecember 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 was approximately $6.5 million, $2.2 million and $0.0 million, respectively.

The cost of the performance based restricted stock awards, calculated as the estimated grant date fair value, net of estimated forfeitures, is recognized over the remaining service period if it is probable that the restricted shares, or any portion thereof, will vest. The cost of the time-based restricted stock awards, net of estimated forfeitures, is being recognized on a straight-line basis over the related vesting period. The estimated fair value of the grants is based upon the closing price of the Company's stock on the date of grant. Total compensation expense recognized for the years endedDecember 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 related to restricted stock was approximately $8.3 million, $3.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively. The related tax benefit recognized for the years endedDecember 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 totaled approximately $3.2 million, $1.3 million and $0.1 million, respectively. At December 31, 2013, there was approximately $9.0 million of unrecognized compensation cost with respect to restricted stock granted under the Incentive Plan. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.2 years.

13. PENSION, PROFIT SHARING AND OTHER POST-RETIREMENT BENEFITS

Nortek and its subsidiaries have various pension plans, supplemental retirement plans for certain officers, profit sharing, and other post-retirement benefit plans requiring contributions to qualified trusts and union administered funds.

The Company's pension plans offer subsidized early retirement and lump sum payments. The Company's actuaries use assumptions to capture the value of these forms of payments within the liability calculation.

The Company's policy is to generally fund currently at least the minimum required annual contribution of its various qualified defined benefit plans. At December 31, 2013, the Company expects to contribute approximately $7.0 million to its defined benefit pension plans in 2014.

F - 42

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

Impact on Financial Statements

Pension, profit sharing and other post-retirement health benefit expense charged to operations aggregated approximately $7.7 million, $7.1 million and $4.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The increase in pension, profit sharing and other post-retirement health benefit expense for 2013 as compared to 2012 is primarily attributable to a net increase in profit sharing expense, partially offset by a reduction in interest cost resulting from lower discount rates for the companies' defined benefit plans tempered by a reduction in the plan’s expected return on assets and a slightly higher required recognition of the cumulative loss.

The increase in pension, profit sharing and other post-retirement health benefit expense for 2012 as compared to 2011 is primarily attributable to a reduction in the expected return assumption for the pension plans. In addition, the Company's defined benefit plans were required to recognize a significant amount of other comprehensive loss in 2011 as a result of a decrease in discount rates and unfavorable investment return, a portion of which was amortized as pension expense in 2012.

The Company’s net periodic benefit cost (income) for its defined benefit and post-retirement health benefit plans for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 consists of the following components:

	For the year ended December 31,
	2013						2012						2011
	Defined Benefit			Post- Retirement Health Benefits			Defined Benefit			Post- Retirement Health Benefits			Defined Benefit			Post- Retirement Health Benefits
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Service cost	$	0.5		$	—		$	0.4		$	—		$	0.5		$	—
Interest cost	6.8			0.1			7.5			0.1			8.6			0.2
Expected return on plan assets	(6.8		)	—			(7.0		)	—			(9.3		)	—
Net amortization of actuarial loss (gain)	0.8			(0.1		)	0.8			(0.2		)	—			(0.1		)
Settlement gain	—			—			—			(0.2		)	—			(0.1		)
Net periodic benefit cost (income)	$	1.3		$	—		$	1.7		$	(0.3	)	$	(0.2	)	$	—

The Company's net periodic benefit cost for its post-retirement health benefit plans reflects settlement accounting resulting from the final payouts of the remaining participants in this plan during 2012, and the retirement of the Company's former Chief Executive Officer in the second quarter of 2011 (see Note 14, "Retirement of Former Chief Executive Officer").

F - 43

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

The following table outlines the rollforward of the benefit obligation and plan assets for the defined benefit and post-retirement health benefit plans for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012:

	December 31,
	2013						2012
	Defined Benefit			Post- Retirement Health Benefits			Defined Benefit			Post- Retirement Health Benefits
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Change in benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation at January 1,	$	193.0		$	2.2		$	186.0		$	5.3
Service cost	0.5			—			0.4			—
Interest cost	6.8			0.1			7.5			0.1
Loss due to foreign exchange	0.8			—			1.7			—
Actuarial (gain) loss, excluding assumption changes	(2.2		)	(0.1		)	0.1			(0.1		)
Actuarial (gain) loss due to assumption changes	(9.1		)	(0.2		)	9.5			—
Benefits and expenses paid	(12.0		)	(0.1		)	(12.2		)	(3.1		)
Benefit obligation at December 31,	$	177.8		$	1.9		$	193.0		$	2.2
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at January 1,	$	131.7		$	—		$	119.1		$	—
Actual gain on plan assets	9.8			—			13.6			—
Gain due to foreign exchange	0.6			—			1.2			—
Employer contribution	3.9			0.1			10.0			3.1
Benefits and expenses paid	(12.0		)	(0.1		)	(12.2		)	(3.1		)
Fair value of plan assets at December 31,	$	134.0		$	—		$	131.7		$	—
Funded status at end of year	$	(43.8	)	$	(1.9	)	$	(61.3	)	$	(2.2	)
Accumulated benefit obligation at end of year	$	177.6		N/A			$	192.8		N/A

The following table outlines the funded status amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2013 and 2012:

	December 31,
	2013				2012
	Defined Benefit		Post- Retirement Health Benefits		Defined Benefit		Post- Retirement Health Benefits
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Current liabilities	$	0.8	$	0.3	$	0.8	$	0.3
Non-current liabilities	43.0		1.6		60.5		1.9
	$	43.8	$	1.9	$	61.3	$	2.2

F - 44

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

Other changes in assets and obligations recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

	For the year ended December 31,
	2013						2012						2011
	Defined Benefit			Post- Retirement Health Benefits			Defined Benefit			Post- Retirement Health Benefits			Defined Benefit			Post- Retirement Health Benefits
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Actuarial gain (loss) arising during the period	$	14.1		$	0.2		$	(3.4	)	$	0.1		$	(30.9	)	$	1.0
Amortization to net (loss) earnings of      net actuarial (gain) loss	0.7			—			0.8			(0.4		)	—			(0.2		)
Deferred income taxes on pension liability	(5.9		)	(0.1		)	(0.1		)	0.1			10.4			(0.3		)
Other comprehensive (loss) income	$	8.9		$	0.1		$	(2.7	)	$	(0.2	)	$	(20.5	)	$	0.5

The adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income represents the net unrecognized actuarial gains and losses. At December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the net actuarial loss recognized within accumulated other comprehensive loss that has not yet been recognized as a component of net periodic pension cost, net of tax, was approximately $15.4 million, $24.4 million and $21.5 million, respectively, which includes the defined benefit and post-retirement health benefit plans. The Company expects to recognize approximately $0.4 million in accumulated other comprehensive income as components of net periodic benefit cost in the year ended December 31, 2014 for its defined benefit plans and an immaterial amount for its post-retirement health benefit plans.

Information for the Company's defined benefit plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 is as follows:

	December 31,
	2013		2012
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Projected benefit obligation	$	177.8	$	193.0
Accumulated benefit obligation	$	177.6	$	192.8
Plan assets	$	134.0	$	131.7

F - 45

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

Pension Assets and Investment Policies

The Company’s pension plan assets by asset category and by investment objective for equity securities, investment funds and investments in limited partnerships are shown in the tables below. Pension plan assets for the foreign plan relate to the Company’s pension plan in the United Kingdom. The investment objective for equity securities represents the principal criteria by which investment manager performance is evaluated. Individual investments included within these groupings may include foreign or other equity investments that are reflective of the overall investment objective for the investment manager.

	December 31, 2013				December 31, 2012
	Investment		% of Total		Investment		% of Total
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Asset Category
Interest bearing cash:
Domestic plans	$	3.3	2.5	%	$	4.5	3.5	%
Fixed income securities:
Domestic plans	50.7		37.8		8.3		6.3
Equity securities:
Domestic plans	—		—		20.2		15.3
Investment funds:
Domestic plans	44.7		33.4		54.4		41.3
Investments in limited partnerships:
Domestic plans	2.8		2.1		14.4		10.9
Investments in pooled pension funds:
Foreign plan	31.8		23.7		29.9		22.7
Other investments:
Domestic plans	0.7		0.5		—		—
Total plan assets	$	134.0	100.0	%	$	131.7	100.0	%
Equity Securities by Investment Objective:
Domestic mid cap growth	$	—	—	%	$	6.0	4.6	%
Domestic mid cap value	—		—		8.3		6.2
Domestic small cap value	—		—		5.9		4.5
	$	—	—	%	$	20.2	15.3	%

F - 46

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

	December 31, 2013				December 31, 2012
	Investment		% of Total		Investment		% of Total
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Investment Funds by investment objective:
Domestic large blend	$	18.1	13.5	%	$	—	—	%
Foreign large blend	9.1		6.8		—		—
Domestic mid cap blend	6.7		5.0		—		—
Domestic small blend	5.4		4.0		—		—
Diversified emerging markets	3.0		2.3		—		—
Real estate	2.4		1.8		—		—
Domestic large cap value	—		—		4.0		3.0
International value	—		—		7.8		5.9
International core	—		—		6.1		4.6
Domestic mid cap value	—		—		6.8		5.2
Domestic small cap value	—		—		6.0		4.6
Domestic small cap core	—		—		3.4		2.6
International macro hedge	—		—		1.6		1.2
Fixed income	—		—		18.7		14.2
	$	44.7	33.4	%	$	54.4	41.3	%
Investments in Limited Partnerships by investment objective:
Domestic large cap core	$	2.8	2.1	%	$	2.7	2.0	%
International core	—		—		2.8		2.1
Domestic mid cap value	—		—		0.1		0.1
Fixed income	—		—		8.8		6.7
	$	2.8	2.1	%	$	14.4	10.9	%
Investments in pooled pension funds by investment objective:
Fixed income	$	12.5	9.3	%	$	12.2	9.3	%
International hedge	19.3		14.4		17.7		13.4
	$	31.8	23.7	%	$	29.9	22.7	%

The Company’s overall weighted-average asset allocations for its domestic and foreign plans at December 31, 2013and 2012 were as follows:

	December 31,
Asset Category	2013		2012
Cash and cash equivalents	2.5	%	3.5	%
Equity based	49.9		60.1
Fixed income based	47.6		36.4
	100.0	%	100.0	%

The Company’s domestic qualified defined benefit plans’ and foreign pension plan’s assets are invested to maximize returns without undue exposure to risk. The domestic plans' investment objectives are to produce a total return exceeding the median of a universe of portfolios with similar average asset allocation and investment style objectives, and to earn a return, net of fees, greater or equal to the long-term rate of return used by the Company in determining pension expense. The foreign plan investment objectives for the fixed income pooled pension fund are to provide capital growth and income primarily through investment in

F - 47

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

non-government debt securities. The foreign plan investment objectives for the international hedge pooled pension fund are to provide positive investment returns in all market conditions over the medium to long-term and the investment strategies include the use of advanced derivative techniques that result in a highly diversified portfolio. As indicated in the tables above, investment risk for both the domestic and foreign plans are controlled by maintaining a portfolio of assets that is diversified across a variety of asset classes and investment styles in order to minimize exposure with respect to the size of individual securities and industry concentration. The domestic plans use a variety of investment managers who are evaluated on a quarterly basis while the foreign plan uses two investment funds to manage its assets. The asset allocation policies of the plans are consistent with the established investment objectives and risk tolerances. The asset allocation policies are developed by examining the historical relationships of risk and return among asset classes, and are designed to provide the highest probability of meeting or exceeding the return objectives at the lowest possible risk.

Effective in 2013, the Company adopted a liability-driven investment approach for its U.S. pension assets as part of its defined benefit plan terminal funding strategy in order to minimize the volatility of the plans' funded status. The allocation to equity investments as a percentage of plan assets has been reduced and the equity investments are now diversified across low-cost index funds to capture higher expected long-term returns while minimizing cost. The increased fixed income allocation is invested in a manner such that any changes to the corporate bond yield curve will result in proportional changes to both the fixed income portfolio value and the plans' terminal funding liability. As the funded status of the plans improves (as measured on a termination basis), the Company will reduce the plans' equity exposure and increase the amount of fixed income investment that is aligned with the plans' expected benefit obligations. This process represents an ongoing reduction in equity return volatility risk that simultaneously reduces interest rate risk associated with both the plans' fixed income portfolio value and terminal funding liability. This approach is expected to significantly reduce the variability of total plan funding costs without increasing the Company's cumulative contributions. The foreign plan target allocation for 2014 is to split the pension assets broadly into 60.0% growth investments and 40.0% bond investments consistent with the portfolio benchmark for 2012.

The following tables set forth by level, within the fair value hierarchy (see Note 15, “Fair Value”), the pension plan assets carried at fair value as of December 31, 2013and2012:

	Assets at Fair Value as of December 31, 2013
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Interest-bearing cash	$	3.3	$	—	$	—	$	3.3
Corporate debt	50.7		—		—		50.7
Investments in Registered Investment Companies	44.7		—		—		44.7
Investments in limited partnerships	—		—		2.8		2.8
Investments in pooled pension funds	31.8		—		—		31.8
Other long-term investments	0.7		—		—		0.7
Total investments at fair value	$	131.2	$	—	$	2.8	$	134.0

	Assets at Fair Value as of December 31, 2012
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Interest-bearing cash	$	4.5	$	—	$	—	$	4.5
Corporate debt	8.3		—		—		8.3
Equity securities	20.2		—		—		20.2
Investments in Registered Investment Companies	54.4		—		—		54.4
Investments in limited partnerships	—		—		14.4		14.4
Investments in pooled pension funds	29.9		—		—		29.9
Total investments at fair value	$	117.3	$	—	$	14.4	$	131.7

F - 48

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

The fair value of investments in limited partnerships is determined based upon information received from the partnerships with respect to the underlying investments held by the respective partnership.

The table below sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the Plan’s Level 3 assets for the year ended December 31, 2013:

	Investments in Limited Partnerships
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Balance, beginning of year	$	14.4
Net realized and unrealized gains on investments	0.1
Sales of investments	(11.7		)
Balance, end of year	$	2.8

Assumptions

The assumptions used in determining pension, supplemental retirement plans and post-retirement costs and the projected benefit obligation are as follows:

	For the Year Ended December 31,
	2013			2012			2011
Discount rate for projected benefit obligation	3.00%	-	4.50%	2.00%	-	4.40%	3.00%	-	4.70%
Discount rate for pension costs	2.00%	-	4.40%	3.00%	-	4.70%	4.00%	-	5.40%
Expected long-term average return on plan assets	5.36%	-	5.50%	5.81%	-	5.92%	6.72%	-	7.75%
Rate of compensation increase	2.00%	-	3.00%	2.00%	-	3.00%	2.00%	-	3.00%

The Company utilizes long-term investment-grade bond yields as the basis for selecting a discount rate by which plan obligations are measured. An analysis of projected cash flows for each plan is performed in order to determine plan-specific duration. Discount rates are selected based on high quality corporate bond yields of similar durations.

For purposes of calculating the post-retirement health benefit cost, a medical inflation rate of 6.75% was assumed for both 2013and 2012. For both 2013and 2012, the rate was assumed to decrease gradually to an ultimate rate of 5.0% by 2014. A one percentage point change in assumed health care cost trends does not have a significant effect on the amount of liabilities recorded in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2013.

F - 49

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

At December 31, 2013, the expected future benefit payments for the defined benefit and post-retirement health benefit plans were as follows:

Year Ended December 31,	Defined Benefit		Post-Retirement Health Benefits
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
2014	$	11.8	$	0.4
2015	11.8		0.3
2016	11.9		0.3
2017	12.0		0.3
2018	12.0		0.2
2019-2023	56.3		0.8

14. RETIREMENT OF FORMER CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Effective as of July 1, 2011 (the “Retirement Date”), the former Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") of the Company retired from his positions of Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and CEO. Under the terms of his agreement dated June 30, 2011 (the “Separation Agreement”), and in consideration for the observation by the former CEO of certain restrictive covenants for a period of 12 months after the Retirement Date, a release of claims against the Company, a non-disparagement covenant, and his agreement to provide certain consulting and transition services to the Company in connection with his retirement from the Company, the former CEO received: (i) a severance payment of $5,250,000, payable over 18 months in equal installments; (ii) a lump sum payment of $1,000,000 in lieu of the lifetime health and medical coverage which would have been due under the former CEO's existing employment agreement, with a tax gross-up; and (iii) approximately $750,000, payable over 18 months in equal installments in respect of certain perquisites set forth in the former CEO's employment agreement. Due to the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and pursuant to Company policy, the cash payments noted above that are due to the former CEO in connection with his separation from service will be delayed for a period of six months. Cash payments that are due to the former CEO in connection with his separation from service began on January 3, 2012. All unvested equity awards held by the former CEO as of the Retirement Date were forfeited, except that half of his stock options that would have vested in 2011 were deemed vested. The former CEO's vested stock options will remain exercisable until the earlier of (i) five years from the Retirement Date or (ii) the expiration date of the stock options. As a result, the Company recorded approximately $8.7 million of severance expense within SG&A during 2011 related to the Separation Agreement. All of the cash payments noted above have been paid to the former CEO of the Company.

F - 50

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

15. FAIR VALUE

The Company’s assets and liabilities recorded at fair value have been categorized based upon a fair value hierarchy in accordance with ASC 820, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures". The levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

• Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets and liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date.

• Level 2 inputs utilize inputs, other than quoted prices included in Level 1, that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.

• Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, allowing for situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability.

Measured on a Recurring Basis

Restricted Investments and Marketable Securities (Level 1) -- The fair value of investments is based on quoted market prices.  The fair value of investments was not materially different from their cost basis at December 31, 2013 or 2012.

Financial Instruments Not Recorded at Fair Value

The carrying value and fair values of financial instruments not recorded at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

Cash and Trade Receivables -- Cash and trade receivables are carried at their cost which approximates fair value (Level 1) because of their short-term nature.

Long-Term Debt -- At December 31, 2013, the fair value of the Company's long-term indebtedness was approximately $107.7 million higher than the amount on the Company's accompanying consolidated balance sheet, before net unamortized debt premium of approximately $4.5 million. At December 31, 2012, the fair value of the Company’s long-term indebtedness was approximately $109.0 million higher than the amount on the Company's consolidated balance sheet, before net unamortized debt premium of approximately $5.3 million.  The Company determined the fair market value of its 10% Notes and 8.5% Notes using available market quotes from published sources (Level 1). For the Company's remaining outstanding indebtedness (including outstanding borrowings under the ABL Facility and the Term Loan Facility), the Company assumed that the carrying value of such indebtedness approximated the fair value based upon the variable interest rates associated with certain of these debt obligations and the Company's estimated credit risk.

F - 51

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

16. CASH FLOWS

The impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on cash was not material and has been included in Other, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows.

Interest paid was approximately $97.3 million, $88.1 million and $96.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Significant non-cash financing and investing activities excluded from the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows include capitalized leases of approximately $0.1 million and $0.9 million for 2013 and 2012, respectively. There were no capitalized lease additions for 2011.

During 2013, the Company recorded a non-cash addition to buildings within property and equipment and other long-term liabilities of approximately $33.6 million related to construction in progress of new facilities in Mexico. Under the terms of the agreements, the Company is considered to be the owner of the asset during the construction period in accordance with the provisions of ASC 840, Leases, with respect to such transactions. The Company anticipates that upon completion of the facilities, it will incur annual payments of approximately $3.1 million under the agreements for a period of ten years. See Note 5, "Exit and Disposal Activities", for further description surrounding the Manufacturing Rationalization and Relocation Initiative associated with these new facilities.

Net cash paid for acquisitions for the periods presented was as follows:

	For the year ended December 31,
	2013			2012		2011
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Fair value of assets acquired	$	201.9		$	—	$	30.2
Fair value of liabilities assumed or created	(55.5		)	—		(5.1		)
Net assets of businesses acquired	146.4			—		25.1
Other payments	—			2.6		5.8
	$	146.4		$	2.6	$	30.9

F - 52

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

17. SUMMARIZED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)

The Company operates on a calendar year and for its interim periods operates on a 4-4-5 fiscal calendar, where each fiscal quarter is comprised of two 4-week periods and one 5-week period, with each week ending on a Saturday. The Company’s fiscal year always begins on January 1 and ends on December 31. As a result, the Company’s first and fourth quarters may have more or less days included than a traditional 4-4-5 fiscal calendar, which consists of 91 days.

The table that follows summarizes unaudited quarterly financial data for 2013:

	For the Quarter Ended
	March 30			June 29		September 28		December 31
	(Dollar amounts in millions, except per share data)
2013
Net sales	$	519.1		$	630.7	$	589.2	$	548.9
Gross profit	141.5			189.1		175.1		154.8
Selling, general and administrative expense, net	125.6			135.1		129.4		131.2
Depreciation expense	9.0			9.8		9.8		12.0
Amortization expense (1)	11.5			16.5		13.2		13.4
Operating earnings	4.6			40.4		32.5		10.4
Net (loss) earnings	(15.1		)	11.5		4.2		(8.9		)
Net (loss) earnings per share:
Basic (loss) earnings per share	$	(0.98	)	$	0.75	$	0.27	$	(0.58	)
Diluted (loss) earnings per share	$	(0.98	)	$	0.73	$	0.27	$	(0.58	)

(1) Includes increases to cost of goods sold for inventory acquired in business combinations.

The table that follows summarizes unaudited quarterly financial data for 2012:

	For the Quarter Ended
	March 31			June 30		September 29		December 31
	(Dollar amounts in millions, except per share data)
2012
Net sales	$	522.8		$	615.7	$	557.4	$	505.4
Gross profit	146.0			183.8		158.4		152.2
Selling, general and administrative expense, net	110.1			119.1		113.6		125.7
Depreciation expense	9.3			9.4		10.3		9.5
Amortization expense (1)	11.0			11.3		11.4		11.5
Operating earnings	24.9			53.7		33.8		15.2
Net (loss) earnings	(1.2		)	18.5		4.7		(12.5		)
Net (loss) earnings per share:
Basic (loss) earnings per share	$	(0.08	)	$	1.22	$	0.31	$	(0.82	)
Diluted (loss) earnings per share	$	(0.08	)	$	1.19	$	0.30	$	(0.82	)

(1) Includes increases to cost of goods sold for inventory acquired in business combinations.

See Note 5, "Exit & Disposal Activities", Note 6, “Commitments and Contingencies”, Note 8, “Income Taxes”, and Note 14, "Retirement of Former Chief Executive Officer", as well as Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Item 7 of Part II, to this report, regarding certain other quarterly transactions which impact the operating results in the above tables, including financing activities, new accounting pronouncements, income taxes, acquisitions, sales volume, material costs, rationalization and relocation of manufacturing operations, material procurement strategies and other items.

F - 53

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

18. GUARANTOR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Company's 10% Notes and 8.5% Notes, including the New 8.5% Notes, are guaranteed by each of the Company's current and future domestic subsidiaries that guarantee the Company's obligations under its senior secured credit facilities (the “Guarantors”). The Guarantors are wholly-owned, either directly or indirectly, by the Company and jointly and severally guarantee the Company's obligations under the 10% Notes and 8.5% Notes. None of the Company's foreign subsidiaries guarantee the 10% Notes or 8.5% Notes.

Consolidating balance sheets related to Nortek, the Guarantors and non-Guarantor subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 and the related consolidating statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 are reflected below in order to comply with the reporting requirements for guarantor subsidiaries.

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)

For the year ended December 31, 2013

				Guarantor			Non-Guarantor						Nortek
	Nortek			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Net Sales	$	—		$	1,938.4		$	729.4		$	(379.9	)	$	2,287.9
Cost of products sold	—			1,389.4			618.2			(380.2		)	1,627.4
Gross profit	—			549.0			111.2			0.3			660.5
Selling, general and administrative expense, net	60.3			370.0			91.0			—			521.3
Amortization of intangible assets	—			49.2			2.9			(0.8		)	51.3
Operating (loss) earnings	(60.3		)	129.8			17.3			1.1			87.9
Interest expense	(96.2		)	(3.0		)	(0.2		)	—			(99.4		)
Investment income	—			—			0.1			—			0.1
(Loss) income before charges and allocations to      subsidiaries and equity in subsidiaries'      (loss) earnings before income taxes	(156.5		)	126.8			17.2			1.1			(11.4		)
Charges and allocations to subsidiaries and equity      in subsidiaries' (loss) earnings before income      taxes	145.1			(67.8		)	1.2			(78.5		)	—
(Loss) earnings before (benefit) provision for      income taxes	(11.4		)	59.0			18.4			(77.4		)	(11.4		)
(Benefit) provision for income taxes	(3.1		)	23.9			6.6			(30.5		)	(3.1		)
Net (loss) earnings	$	(8.3	)	$	35.1		$	11.8		$	(46.9	)	$	(8.3	)
Comprehensive (loss) income	$	(2.3	)	$	38.1		$	7.8		$	(45.9	)	$	(2.3	)

F - 54

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations and Comprehensive (Loss) Income

For the year ended December 31, 2012

				Guarantor			Non-Guarantor						Nortek
	Nortek			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Net Sales	$	—		$	1,809.5		$	711.4		$	(319.6	)	$	2,201.3
Cost of products sold	—			1,277.1			601.8			(318.0		)	1,560.9
Gross profit	—			532.4			109.6			(1.6		)	640.4
Selling, general and administrative expense, net	44.7			338.6			85.2			—			468.5
Amortization of intangible assets	—			41.9			2.8			(0.4		)	44.3
Operating (loss) earnings	(44.7		)	151.9			21.6			(1.2		)	127.6
Interest expense	(93.9		)	(2.2		)	(0.4		)	—			(96.5		)
Loss from debt retirement	(6.4		)	—			—			—			(6.4		)
Investment income	—			—			0.1			—			0.1
(Loss) income before charges and allocations to      subsidiaries and equity in subsidiaries' earnings      (loss) before income taxes	(145.0		)	149.7			21.3			(1.2		)	24.8
Charges and allocations to subsidiaries and equity      in subsidiaries' earnings (loss) before income      taxes	169.8			(59.3		)	12.4			(122.9		)	—
Earnings (loss) before provision (benefit) for      income taxes	24.8			90.4			33.7			(124.1		)	24.8
Provision (benefit) for income taxes	15.3			34.2			7.6			(41.8		)	15.3
Net earnings (loss)	$	9.5		$	56.2		$	26.1		$	(82.3	)	$	9.5
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	8.0		$	56.6		$	25.2		$	(81.8	)	$	8.0

F - 55

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations and Comprehensive (Loss) Income

For the year ended December 31, 2011

				Guarantor			Non-Guarantor						Nortek
	Nortek			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Net Sales	$	—		$	1,736.9		$	693.4		$	(289.8	)	$	2,140.5
Cost of products sold	—			1,245.5			612.0			(289.7		)	1,567.8
Gross profit	—			491.4			81.4			(0.1		)	572.7
Selling, general and administrative expense, net	40.4			335.2			89.2			—			464.8
Amortization of intangible assets	—			42.3			2.5			—			44.8
Operating (loss) earnings	(40.4		)	113.9			(10.3		)	(0.1		)	63.1
Interest expense	(102.6		)	(1.9		)	(1.1		)	—			(105.6		)
Loss from debt retirement	(33.8		)	—			—			—			(33.8		)
Investment income	—			—			0.1			—			0.1
(Loss) income before charges and allocations to      subsidiaries and equity in subsidiaries'      (loss) earnings before income taxes	(176.8		)	112.0			(11.3		)	(0.1		)	(76.2		)
Charges and allocations to subsidiaries and equity      in subsidiaries' (loss) earnings before income      taxes	100.6			(72.2		)	0.3			(28.7		)	—
(Loss) earnings before (benefit) provision for      income taxes	(76.2		)	39.8			(11.0		)	(28.8		)	(76.2		)
(Benefit) provision for income taxes	(20.3		)	14.6			6.1			(20.7		)	(20.3		)
Net (loss) earnings	$	(55.9	)	$	25.2		$	(17.1	)	$	(8.1	)	$	(55.9	)
Comprehensive (loss) income	$	(77.5	)	$	20.3		$	(21.6	)	$	1.3		$	(77.5	)

F - 56

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2013

			Guarantor		Non-Guarantor					Nortek
	Nortek		Subsidiaries		Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
ASSETS:
Current Assets:
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents	$	23.2	$	20.0	$	37.7	$	—		$	80.9
Restricted cash	2.7		0.1		0.1		—			2.9
Accounts receivable, less allowances	0.1		219.2		57.1		—			276.4
Intercompany receivables	1.4		—		60.5		(61.9		)	—
Inventories, net	—		204.5		72.0		(6.0		)	270.5
Prepaid expenses	3.2		11.0		6.0		—			20.2
Other current assets	0.1		6.5		12.8		—			19.4
Deferred tax assets	4.8		26.3		—		(1.4		)	29.7
Total current assets	35.5		487.6		246.2		(69.3		)	700.0
Property and Equipment, at Cost:
Total property and equipment, net	7.0		157.4		68.0		—			232.4
Other Long-term Assets:
Investment in subsidiaries and long-term      receivable from (to) subsidiaries	1,180.7		418.6		—		(1,599.3		)	—
Goodwill	—		357.8		15.7		—			373.5
Intangible assets, less accumulated amortization	—		627.1		32.2		(10.4		)	648.9
Deferred tax asset	10.2		—		—		(10.2		)	—
Other assets	20.3		14.6		1.2		—			36.1
Total other long-term assets	1,211.2		1,418.1		49.1		(1,619.9		)	1,058.5
Total Assets	$	1,253.7	$	2,063.1	$	363.3	$	(1,689.2	)	$	1,990.9
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' INVESTMENT (DEFICIT):
Current Liabilities:
Short term bank obligations	$	—	$	—	$	0.7	$	—		$	0.7
Current maturities of long-term debt	0.3		2.5		—		—			2.8
Accounts payable	2.3		103.7		108.7		—			214.7
Accrued expenses and taxes	36.2		152.4		42.9		—			231.5
Current deferred taxes	—		—		1.4		(1.4		)	—
Intercompany payables	—		61.9		—		(61.9		)	—
Total current liabilities	38.8		320.5		153.7		(63.3		)	449.7
Other Liabilities:
Deferred income taxes	—		163.8		7.7		(12.4		)	159.1
Other long-term liabilities	31.7		135.6		21.6		—			188.9
Long-term intercompany payables	—		—		49.4		(49.4		)	—
	31.7		299.4		78.7		(61.8		)	348.0
Notes, Mortgage Notes and Obligations      Payable, Less Current Maturities	1,083.3		10.0		—		—			1,093.3
Stockholders' investment (deficit)	99.9		1,433.2		130.9		(1,564.1		)	99.9
Total Liabilities and Stockholders'      Investment (Deficit)	$	1,253.7	$	2,063.1	$	363.3	$	(1,689.2	)	$	1,990.9

F - 57

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2012

			Guarantor		Non-Guarantor					Nortek
	Nortek		Subsidiaries		Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
ASSETS:
Current Assets:
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents	$	94.9	$	13.1	$	36.7	$	—		$	144.7
Restricted cash	—		—		0.2		—			0.2
Accounts receivable, less allowances	—		191.7		65.7		—			257.4
Intercompany receivables	1.0		—		42.3		(43.3		)	—
Inventories, net	—		192.4		71.6		(5.6		)	258.4
Prepaid expenses	1.2		8.7		4.5		—			14.4
Other current assets	—		10.7		10.4		(1.1		)	20.0
Deferred tax assets	18.3		12.6		—		(1.6		)	29.3
Total current assets	115.4		429.2		231.4		(51.6		)	724.4
Property and Equipment, at Cost:
Total property and equipment, net	3.0		128.7		67.8		—			199.5
Other Long-term Assets:
Investment in subsidiaries and long-term      receivable from (to) subsidiaries	1,107.8		321.2		—		(1,429.0		)	—
Goodwill	—		292.7		14.9		—			307.6
Intangible assets, less accumulated amortization	—		591.6		34.5		(11.2		)	614.9
Deferred tax asset	10.9		—		—		(10.9		)	—
Other assets	25.4		15.7		0.6		—			41.7
Total other long-term assets	1,144.1		1,221.2		50.0		(1,451.1		)	964.2
Total Assets	$	1,262.5	$	1,779.1	$	349.2	$	(1,502.7	)	$	1,888.1
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' INVESTMENT (DEFICIT):
Current Liabilities:
Short term bank obligations	$	—	$	—	$	0.7	$	—		$	0.7
Current maturities of long-term debt	0.3		2.1		—		—			2.4
Accounts payable	4.1		76.7		93.6		—			174.4
Accrued expenses and taxes	31.1		119.4		48.8		(0.4		)	198.9
Current deferred taxes	—		—		1.6		(1.6		)	—
Intercompany payables	—		43.3		—		(43.3		)	—
Total current liabilities	35.5		241.5		144.7		(45.3		)	376.4
Other Liabilities:
Deferred income taxes	—		137.3		8.7		(13.3		)	132.7
Other long-term liabilities	47.7		110.3		28.9		—			186.9
Long-term intercompany payables	—		—		44.0		(44.0		)	—
	47.7		247.6		81.6		(57.3		)	319.6
Notes, Mortgage Notes and Obligations      Payable, Less Current Maturities	1,085.1		12.8		—		—			1,097.9
Stockholders' investment (deficit)	94.2		1,277.2		122.9		(1,400.1		)	94.2
Total Liabilities and Stockholders'      Investment (Deficit)	$	1,262.5	$	1,779.1	$	349.2	$	(1,502.7	)	$	1,888.1

F - 58

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

Condensed Consolidating Cash Flow Statement

For the year ended December 31, 2013

				Guarantor			Non-Guarantor			Nortek
	Nortek			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries			Consolidated
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Cash Flows from operating activities:
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities	$	(151.7	)	$	276.2		$	10.7		$	135.2
Cash Flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures	(5.1		)	(27.9		)	(10.8		)	(43.8		)
Net cash paid for businesses acquired	(145.5		)	—			(0.9		)	(146.4		)
Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment	—			0.1			0.1			0.2
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash and marketable securities	(2.7		)	0.3			—			(2.4		)
Intercompany capital contributions	(2.2		)	2.2			—			—
Other, net	(0.1		)	(0.7		)	(0.1		)	(0.9		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(155.6		)	(26.0		)	(11.7		)	(193.3		)
Cash Flows from financing activities:
Increase in borrowings	150.0			—			3.1			153.1
Payment of borrowings	(150.3		)	(2.6		)	(3.1		)	(156.0		)
Net proceeds from equity transactions	(2.5		)	—			—			(2.5		)
Long-term intercompany advances and loans	238.7			(240.7		)	2.0			—
Other, net	(0.3		)	—			—			(0.3		)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	235.6			(243.3		)	2.0			(5.7		)
Net change in unrestricted cash and cash equivalents	(71.7		)	6.9			1.0			(63.8		)
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents at the      beginning of the period	94.9			13.1			36.7			144.7
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents at the      end of the period	$	23.2		$	20.0		$	37.7		$	80.9

F - 59

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

Condensed Consolidating Cash Flow Statement

For the year ended December 31, 2012

				Guarantor			Non-Guarantor			Nortek
	Nortek			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries			Consolidated
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Cash Flows from operating activities:
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities	$	(141.4	)	$	280.1		$	25.5		$	164.2
Cash Flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures	(1.8		)	(16.2		)	(6.1		)	(24.1		)
Net cash paid for businesses acquired	(2.6		)	—			—			(2.6		)
Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment	—			2.5			0.5			3.0
Decrease in restricted cash and marketable securities	0.1			0.1			—			0.2
Intercompany dividends	—			6.5			(6.5		)	—
Other, net	0.1			—			(0.1		)	—
Net cash used in investing activities	(4.2		)	(7.1		)	(12.2		)	(23.5		)
Cash Flows from financing activities:
Increase in borrowings	30.0			—			4.6			34.6
Payment of borrowings	(57.7		)	(2.4		)	(23.9		)	(84.0		)
Net proceeds from the sale of the 8.5% Senior Notes due 2021	251.7			—			—			251.7
Redemption of the Term Loan Facility	(251.7		)	—			—			(251.7		)
Fees paid in connection with debt facilities	(5.9		)	—			—			(5.9		)
Net proceeds from equity transactions	1.2			—			—			1.2
Long-term intercompany advances and loans	255.2			(266.8		)	11.6			—
Other, net	(0.1		)	—			—			(0.1		)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	222.7			(269.2		)	(7.7		)	(54.2		)
Net change in unrestricted cash and cash equivalents	77.1			3.8			5.6			86.5
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents at the      beginning of the period	17.8			9.3			31.1			58.2
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents at the      end of the period	$	94.9		$	13.1		$	36.7		$	144.7

F - 60

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

December 31, 2013

Condensed Consolidating Cash Flow Statement

For the year ended December 31, 2011

				Guarantor			Non-Guarantor			Nortek
	Nortek			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries			Consolidated
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
Cash Flows from operating activities:
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities	$	(121.6	)	$	185.5		$	17.0		$	80.9
Cash Flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures	(0.1		)	(14.8		)	(6.2		)	(21.1		)
Net cash paid for businesses acquired	(5.8		)	(25.1		)	—			(30.9		)
Investment in joint venture	—			(5.3		)	—			(5.3		)
Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment	0.7			0.5			0.1			1.3
Decrease in restricted cash and marketable securities	—			0.2			—			0.2
Other, net	—			—			0.1			0.1
Net cash used in investing activities	(5.2		)	(44.5		)	(6.0		)	(55.7		)
Cash Flows from financing activities:
Increase in borrowings	50.0			5.3			27.5			82.8
Payment of borrowings	(102.6		)	(6.9		)	(30.8		)	(140.3		)
Sale of the 8.5% Senior Notes due 2021	500.0			—			—			500.0
Net proceeds from borrowings under the Term Loan Facility	348.2			—			—			348.2
Redemption of the 11% Senior Secured Notes due 2013	(753.3		)	—			—			(753.3		)
Fees paid in connection with debt facilities	(59.6		)	—			—			(59.6		)
Net proceeds from equity transactions	(2.7		)	—			—			(2.7		)
Intercompany capital contributions	(3.0		)	2.7			0.3			—
Long-term intercompany advances and loans	151.5			(154.2		)	2.7			—
Other, net	0.1			0.1			—			0.2
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	128.6			(153.0		)	(0.3		)	(24.7		)
Net change in unrestricted cash and cash equivalents	1.8			(12.0		)	10.7			0.5
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents at the      beginning of the period	16.0			21.3			20.4			57.7
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents at the      end of the period	$	17.8		$	9.3		$	31.1		$	58.2

F - 61

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Nortek, Inc. and subsidiaries

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Nortek, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), cash flows, and stockholders' investment for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the index at item 15(b). These consolidated financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and schedules based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Nortek, Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Nortek, Inc. and subsidiaries' internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 Framework) and our report dated March 11, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Boston, Massachusetts

March 11, 2014

F - 62

NORTEK, INC.  AND SUBSIDIARIES

SCHEDULE II

VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

Classification	Balance at Beginning of Year		Charged to Cost and Expense		Charged to Other Accounts				Deduction from Reserves				Balance at End of Year
	(Dollar amounts in millions)
For the year-ended December 31, 2011
Allowance for doubtful accounts and sales allowances	$	4.9	$	2.2	$	(0.5	)	(a)	$	(1.4	)	(b)	$	5.2
For the year-ended December 31, 2012
Allowance for doubtful accounts and sales allowances	$	5.2	$	3.3	$	1.0		(a)	$	(2.3	)	(b)	$	7.2
For the year-ended December 31, 2013
Allowance for doubtful accounts and sales allowances	$	7.2	$	0.6	$	—		(a)	$	(3.6	)	(b)	$	4.2

(a) Other, including the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates.

(b) Amounts written off, net of recoveries.

S - 1

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

December 31, 2013

Exhibit Index

Exhibit No.		Description
2	.1	Joint Plan of Reorganization of Nortek, Inc. filed with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware on December 4, 2009. (Exhibit 2.1 to Nortek, Inc. Form 10 filed April 15, 2010.)
2	.2	Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of December 3, 2010 among Ergotron, Inc., the Seller Representatives named therein, Nortek, Inc., and Eagan Acquisition Corporation. (Exhibit 2.1 to Nortek, Inc. Form 8-K filed December 6, 2010.)
2	.3	Stock Purchase Agreement dated February 13, 2013 by and between Nortek, Inc. and APX Group, Inc. (Exhibit 2.1 to Nortek, Inc. Form 8-K filed April 1, 2013.)
3	.1	Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Nortek, Inc. (Exhibit 3.1 to Nortek, Inc. Form 10 filed April 15, 2010.)
3	.2	Amended and Restated By-Laws of Nortek, Inc. (Exhibit 3.2 to Nortek, Inc. Form 10 filed April 15, 2010.)
4	.1	Form of Common Stock Certificate. (Exhibit 4.3 to Nortek, Inc. Form 10 filed April 15, 2010.)
4	.2	Form of Warrant to Purchase Common Stock. (Exhibit 4.4 to Nortek, Inc. Form 10 filed April 15, 2010.)
4	.3	Amended and Restated Warrant Agreement between Nortek, Inc. as Issuer and U.S. Bank National Association as Warrant Agent. (Exhibit 4.1 to Nortek, Inc. Form 10-Q filed August 17, 2010.)
4	.4	Indenture dated as of November 23, 2010 between Nortek, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee relating to the 10% Senior Notes due 2018 (Exhibit 4.1 to Nortek, Inc. Form 8-K filed November 24, 2010.)
4	.5	Registration Rights Agreement dated November 23, 2010 by and among Nortek, Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith Incorporated (Exhibit 4.2 to Nortek, Inc. Form 8-K filed November 24, 2010.)
4	.6	Indenture dated as of April 26, 2011 between Nortek, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee relating to 8.5% Senior Notes due 2021 (Exhibit 10.2 to Nortek, Inc. Form 8-K filed April 28, 2011).
4	.7	Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of April 26, 2011, by and among Nortek, Inc., the Guarantors party thereto and UBS Securities LLC as the Initial Purchaser. (Exhibit 10.3 to Nortek, Inc. Form 8-K filed April 28, 2011.)
4	.8	Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of October 18, 2012, by and among Nortek, Inc., the Guarantors party thereto and UBS Securities LLC (Exhibit 4.1 to Nortek, Inc. Form 8-K filed October 19, 2012.)
**10	.1	Form of Indemnification Agreement between Nortek, Inc. and certain officers and directors. (Exhibit 10.1 to Nortek, Inc. Form 10 filed April 15, 2010.)
**10	.2	Employment Agreement of Michael J. Clarke, dated as of December 16, 2011. (Exhibit 10.1 to Nortek, Inc. Form 8-K filed December 21, 2011.)
**10	.3	Consulting Agreement, dated July 14, 2011, between Hirshorn Operating Partners LLC and Nortek, Inc. (Exhibit 10.1 to Nortek, Inc. form 10-Q filed August 9, 2011.)
**10	.4	Amended and Restated Employment Agreement of Almon C. Hall, III, dated as of August 27, 2004. (Exhibit 10.4 to Nortek, Inc. Form 10 filed April 15, 2010.)
**10	.5	Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement of Almon C. Hall, III, dated as of December 17, 2009. (Exhibit 10.5 to Nortek, Inc. Form 10 filed April 15, 2010.)
**10	.6	Amended and Restated Employment Agreement of Kevin W. Donnelly, dated as of August 27, 2004. (Exhibit 10.6 to Nortek, Inc. Form 10 filed April 15, 2010.)
**10	.7	Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement of Kevin W. Donnelly, dated as of December 17, 2009. (Exhibit 10.7 to Nortek, Inc. Form 10 filed April 15, 2010.)

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

December 31, 2013

Exhibit No.		Description
**10	.8	Nortek, Inc. 2009 Omnibus Incentive Plan. (Exhibit 10.10 to Nortek, Inc. Form 10 filed April 15, 2010.)
**10	.9	Form of Restricted Stock Agreement. (Exhibit 10.1 to Nortek, Inc. Form 10 filed April 15, 2010.)
**10	.10	Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement. (Exhibit 10.12 to Nortek, Inc. Form 10 filed April 15, 2010.)
**10	.11	Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement. (Exhibit 10.13 to Nortek, Inc. Form 10 filed April 15, 2010.)
**10	.12	Nortek, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan B, effective as of January 1, 1998. (Exhibit 10.15 to Nortek, Inc. Form 10 filed April 15, 2010.)
**10	.13	First Amendment to the Nortek, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan B, dated as of May 4, 2000. (Exhibit 10.16 to Nortek, Inc. Form 10 filed April 15, 2010.)
**10	.14	Second Amendment to the Nortek, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan B, dated as of January 4, 2002. (Exhibit 10.17 to Nortek, Inc. Form 10 filed April 15, 2010.)
**10	.15	Third Amendment to the Nortek, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan B, dated as of October 31, 2006. (Exhibit 10.18 to Nortek, Inc. Form 10 filed April 15, 2010.)
**10	.16	Fourth Amendment to the Nortek, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan B, dated as of December 31, 2008. (Exhibit 10.19 to Nortek, Inc. Form 10 filed April 15, 2010.)
**10	.17	Nortek, Inc. 2009 OmniBus Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated (Appendix A to Nortek, Inc. Proxy Statement filed April 4, 2012.)
10	.18	U.S. Security Agreement, dated December 17, 2009 among Nortek, Inc. as the Specified U.S. Borrower, the Additional Grantors party thereto and Bank of America, N.A. as Administrative Agent. (Exhibit 10.22 to Nortek, Inc. Form 10 filed April 15, 2010.)
10	.19	U.S. Guaranty, dated December 17, 2009, by Nortek, Inc., the other Persons party thereto and the Additional Guarantors as Guarantors. (Exhibit 10.25 to Amendment No. 2 to Nortek, Inc. Form 10 filed September 14, 2011.)
10	.20	Joinder and Amendment Agreement, dated as of March 30, 2010. (Exhibit 10.25 to Nortek, Inc. Form 10 filed April 15, 2010.)
10	.21	Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated December 17, 2010 among Nortek, Inc. as the Specified U.S. Borrower, Ventrol Air Handling Systems Inc. as the Canadian Borrower, the other Borrowers named therein, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, U.S. Swing Line Lender and U.S. L/C Issuer, Bank of America, N.A. (acting through its Canada Branch), as Canadian Swing Line Lender and Canadian L/C Issuer, the other Lenders Party thereto, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners and Bank of America, N.A. and General Electric Capital Corporation, as Collateral Agents, and General Electric Capital Corporation and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC as Co-Syndication Agents. (Exhibit 10.1 to Nortek, Inc. Form 8-K filed December 20, 2010.)
10	.22	Affirmation of Guaranties and Security Agreement and Consent to Amendment, dated December 17, 2010, by the Guarantors party thereto in favor of Bank of America, N.A. as Administrative Agent. (Exhibit 10.26 to Amendment No. 2 to Nortek, Inc. Form 10 filed September 14, 2011.)
10	.23	Amendment No. 1 dated April 26, 2011, to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated December 17, 2010 among Nortek, Inc. as the Specified U.S. Borrower, Ventrol Air Handling Systems Inc. as the Canadian Borrower, the other Borrowers named therein, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, U.S. Swing Line Lender and U.S. L/C Issuer, Bank of America, N.A. (acting through its Canada Branch), as Canadian Swing Line Lender and Canadian L/C Issuer, the other Lenders Party thereto, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners and Bank of America, N.A. and General Electric Capital Corporation, as Collateral Agents, and General Electric Capital Corporation and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC as Co-Syndication Agents. (Exhibit 10.5 to Nortek, Inc. Form 8-K filed April 28, 2011.)

NORTEK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

December 31, 2013

Exhibit No.		Description
10	.24	Credit Agreement, dated as of April 26, 2011, among Nortek, Inc., as the Borrower, UBS AG, Stamford Branch, as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent, the other financial institutions party thereto as Lenders, UBS Securities LLC as Sole Arranger and Bookrunner, and Syndication Agent and Documentation Agent. (Exhibit 10.14 to Nortek, Inc. Form 8-K filed April 28, 2011.)
10	.25	Second Amendment, dated June 13, 2012, to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated December 17, 2010 among Nortek, Inc. as the Specified U.S. Borrower, Ventrol Air Handling Systems Inc. as the Canadian Borrower, the other Borrowers named therein, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, U.S. Swing Line Lender and U.S. L/C Issuer, Bank of America, N.A. (acting through its Canada Branch), as Canadian Swing Line Lender and Canadian L/C Issuer, the other Lenders Party thereto, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC as Joint Lead Arrangers, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, as Sole Bookrunner and Bank of America, N.A. as Collateral Agent and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC, as Syndication Agency and UBS Securities LLC and US Bank, N.A. as Co-Documentation Agents (Exhibit 10.1 to Nortek, Inc. Form 8-K/A filed June 15, 2012.)
10	.26	Security Agreement, dated April 26, 2011, among Nortek, Inc. and the Additional Grantors party thereto and UBS AG, Stamford Branch, as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent. (Exhibit 10.29 to Amendment No. 2 to Nortek, Inc. Form 10 filed September 14, 2011.)
10	.27	Guaranty, dated April 26, 2011, by Nortek, Inc., the other Persons party thereto and the Additional Guarantors as Guarantors. (Exhibit 10.30 to Amendment No. 2 to Nortek, Inc. Form 10 filed September 14, 2011.)
10	.28	Lien Subordination and Intercreditor Agreement, dated April 26, 2011, among Bank of America, N.A. as Administrative Agent under the ABL Credit Agreement, UBS AG, Stamford Branch, as Term Loan Collateral Agent, Nortek, Inc., and the subsidiaries of Nortek, Inc. party thereto. (Exhibit 10.31 to Amendment No. 2 to Nortek, Inc. Form 10 filed September 14, 2011.)
10	.29	Investor Agreement, dated as of April 4, 2012, by and between Nortek, Inc. and (i) Ares Corporate Opportunities Fund, II, L.P., (ii) ACOF Management II, L.P., (iii) ACOF Operating Manager II, L.P., (iv) Ares Management, Inc., (v) Ares Corporate Opportunities Fund III, L.P., (vi) ACOF Management III, L.P., (vii) ACOF Operating Holdings Manager III, LLC, V(viii) Ares Management LLC, (iv)x) Ares Management Holdings LLC, (x) Ares Holdings LLC and (xi) Ares xi) Ares Partners Management Company LLC( (Exhibit 10.1 to Nortek, Inc. From 8-K filed April 4, 2012).)
*21	.1	List of subsidiaries.
*23	.1	Consent of Ernst & Young LLP
*31	.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
*31	.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
*32		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
* 101	.INS	XBRL Instance Document
* 101	.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
* 101	.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
* 101	.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
* 101	.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
* 101	.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

*    Filed herewith

**    Management / Employment Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement