Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 1-32940
NUSTAR GP HOLDINGS, LLC
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 85-0470977 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
2330 North Loop 1604 West
San Antonio, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices)
78248
(Zip Code)
Telephone number: (210) 918-2000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):
Large accelerated filer | x | Accelerated filer | ¨ | |||
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The number of units outstanding as of August 1, 2008 was 42,508,263.
Table of Contents
NUSTAR GP HOLDINGS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
Table of Contents
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. | Financial Statements |
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Thousands of Dollars)
June 30, 2008 | December 31, 2007 | |||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||
Assets | ||||||
Current assets: | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 3,815 | $ | 3,240 | ||
Accounts receivable | 686 | 90 | ||||
Receivable from NuStar Energy L.P. | 3,081 | — | ||||
Income tax receivable | 1,611 | 2,870 | ||||
Prepaid expenses | 116 | 231 | ||||
Deferred income tax assets, net | 1,198 | 985 | ||||
Total current assets | 10,507 | 7,416 | ||||
Investment in NuStar Energy L.P. | 549,578 | 556,987 | ||||
Long-term receivable from NuStar Energy L.P. | 6,677 | 5,684 | ||||
Deferred income tax assets, net | 1,723 | 540 | ||||
Other assets | 44 | 3,204 | ||||
Total assets | $ | 568,529 | $ | 573,831 | ||
Liabilities and Members’ Equity | ||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 403 | $ | 171 | ||
Payable to NuStar Energy L.P. | — | 786 | ||||
Accrued compensation expense | 5,003 | 3,851 | ||||
Accrued liabilities | 494 | 888 | ||||
Taxes other than income taxes | 397 | 1,111 | ||||
Total current liabilities | 6,297 | 6,807 | ||||
Long-term debt | 8,000 | 3,000 | ||||
Employee benefit plan liabilities | 11,269 | 10,238 | ||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9) | ||||||
Members’ equity | 536,672 | 546,753 | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income: | ||||||
Share of NuStar Energy L.P.’s other comprehensive income | 5,235 | 5,985 | ||||
Pension adjustment, net of tax | 1,056 | 1,048 | ||||
Total accumulated other comprehensive income | 6,291 | 7,033 | ||||
Total members’ equity | 542,963 | 553,786 | ||||
Total liabilities and members’ equity | $ | 568,529 | $ | 573,831 | ||
See Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited, Thousands of Dollars, Except Unit and Per Unit Data)
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of NuStar Energy L.P. | $ | 6,704 | $ | 11,951 | $ | 22,458 | $ | 21,508 | ||||||||
General and administrative expenses | (824 | ) | (747 | ) | (1,566 | ) | (1,543 | ) | ||||||||
Other (expense) income, net | (82 | ) | 24 | (82 | ) | (2 | ) | |||||||||
Interest (expense) income, net | (67 | ) | 18 | (96 | ) | 14 | ||||||||||
Income before income tax benefit | 5,731 | 11,246 | 20,714 | 19,977 | ||||||||||||
Income tax benefit | 49 | 2 | 69 | 42 | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 5,780 | $ | 11,248 | $ | 20,783 | $ | 20,019 | ||||||||
Basic net income per unit | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.26 | $ | 0.49 | $ | 0.47 | ||||||||
Weighted average number of basic units outstanding | 42,500,990 | 42,500,000 | 42,500,990 | 42,500,000 | ||||||||||||
Diluted net income per unit | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.26 | $ | 0.49 | $ | 0.47 | ||||||||
Weighted average number of diluted units outstanding | 42,508,263 | 42,501,705 | 42,504,570 | 42,501,540 | ||||||||||||
See Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited, Thousands of Dollars)
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 20,783 | $ | 20,019 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
Equity in earnings of NuStar Energy L.P. | (22,458 | ) | (21,508 | ) | ||||
Distributions of equity in earnings from NuStar Energy L.P. | 22,458 | 21,508 | ||||||
Benefit for deferred income taxes | (1,396 | ) | (1,372 | ) | ||||
Increase in employee benefit plan liabilities | 1,031 | 3,195 | ||||||
Changes in current assets and liabilities (Note 7) | (2,509 | ) | 675 | |||||
Other, net | 2,446 | 64 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 20,355 | 22,581 | ||||||
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: | ||||||||
Distributions in excess of equity in earnings from NuStar Energy L.P. | 10,892 | 6,924 | ||||||
Investment in NuStar Energy L.P. | (5,025 | ) | (1,667 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of NuStar Energy L.P. units in connection with employee benefit plans | 33 | 986 | ||||||
Other, net | (80 | ) | — | |||||
Net cash provided by investing activities | 5,820 | 6,243 | ||||||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: | ||||||||
Long-term debt borrowings | 5,000 | — | ||||||
Distributions to unitholders | (30,600 | ) | (27,200 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities | (25,600 | ) | (27,200 | ) | ||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | 575 | 1,624 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period | 3,240 | 1,107 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period | $ | 3,815 | $ | 2,731 | ||||
See Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
Table of Contents
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Organization
NuStar GP Holdings, LLC (NuStar GP Holdings) (NYSE: NSH) is a publicly held Delaware limited liability company. As used in this report, references to “we,” “us,” or “our” collectively refer, depending on the context, to NuStar GP Holdings, or a wholly owned subsidiary.
We have no operations or sources of income or cash flows other than our investment in NuStar Energy L.P. (NuStar Energy) (NYSE: NS). On June 30, 2008, we owned approximately 20.4% of NuStar Energy, consisting of the following:
• | the 2% general partner interest in NuStar Energy, which we hold through our 100% ownership interest in Riverwalk Logistics, L.P.; |
• | 100% of the incentive distribution rights issued by NuStar Energy, which entitles us to receive increasing percentages of the cash distributed by NuStar Energy, currently at the maximum percentage of 23%; and |
• | 10,218,708 common units of NuStar Energy representing an 18.4% limited partner interest in NuStar Energy. |
NuStar Energy is a publicly held Delaware limited partnership engaged in crude oil and refined product transportation, liquids terminalling and storage, and asphalt and fuels marketing. NuStar Energy has terminal facilities in the United States, the Netherland Antilles, Canada, Mexico, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. NuStar Energy conducts substantially all of its business through its wholly owned subsidiaries, NuStar Logistics, L.P. (NuStar Logistics) and NuStar Pipeline Operating Partnership L.P. (NuPOP), formerly Kaneb Pipe Line Operating Partnership, L.P.
On March 20, 2008, NuStar Energy completed the acquisition of CITGO Asphalt Refining Company’s asphalt operations and assets (the East Coast Asphalt Operations) for approximately $808.5 million. The East Coast Asphalt Operations include a 74,000 barrels-per-day (BPD) asphalt refinery in Paulsboro, New Jersey, a 30,000 BPD asphalt refinery in Savannah, Georgia and three asphalt terminals on the East Coast with a combined storage capacity of 4.8 million barrels.
Basis of Presentation
These unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of NuStar GP Holdings and subsidiaries in which it has a controlling interest. Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
We account for our ownership interest in NuStar Energy using the equity method. Therefore, our financial results reflect a portion of NuStar Energy’s net income based on our ownership interest in NuStar Energy. We have no separate operating activities apart from those conducted by NuStar Energy and therefore generate no revenues from operations.
These unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature unless disclosed otherwise. Financial information for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 included in these Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements is derived from our unaudited consolidated financial statements. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2008.
The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2007 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements as of that date. You should read these consolidated financial statements in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Reclassifications
Certain previously reported amounts in the 2007 consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to 2008 presentation.
6
Table of Contents
NUSTAR GP HOLDINGS, LLC
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
2. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
FASB Staff Position EITF 03-6-1
In June 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Staff Position No. EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities” (FSP EITF 03-6-1). According to FSP EITF 03-6-1, unvested share-based payment awards are considered participating securities if they contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents and are therefore included in the earnings allocation in computing basic earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. FSP EITF 03-6-1 applies retroactively for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and interim periods within those years. Accordingly, we will not adopt FSP EITF 03-6-1 until January 1, 2009, and we do not expect it to materially affect our computation of earnings per unit.
FASB Statement No. 141R
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141 (Revised 2007), “Business Combinations.” Statement 141R will significantly change the accounting for business combinations. Under Statement 141R, an acquiring entity will be required to recognize all the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition-date fair value with limited exceptions. Statement 141R will change the accounting treatment for certain specific items, such as acquisition costs, acquired contingent liabilities, restructuring costs, changes in deferred tax asset valuation allowances and other items. Statement 141R also includes a substantial number of new disclosure requirements. Statement 141R applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. Accordingly, we will not adopt the provisions of Statement 141R until January 1, 2009.
EITF Issue No. 06-11
In June 2007, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached a consensus on Issue No. 06-11, “Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards” (EITF No. 06-11). According to EITF 06-11, the income tax benefit realized from dividends related to unvested share-based payment awards that are charged to retained earnings should be recorded in additional paid-in capital. The amount recorded in additional paid-in capital for the realized income tax benefit should be included in the pool of excess tax benefits available to absorb tax deficiencies on share-based payment awards. EITF No. 06-11 is effective for tax benefits of dividends declared in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. Accordingly, we have adopted EITF 06-11 effective January 1, 2008 and it has not materially affected our financial position or results of operations.
3. INVESTMENT IN NUSTAR ENERGY
In April 2008, NuStar Energy issued 5,050,800 common units representing limited partner interests at a price of $48.75 per unit. NuStar Energy received proceeds of $236.2 million, net of issuance cost and we contributed $5.0 million to NuStar Energy in order to maintain our 2% general partner interest. As of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, our ownership interest in NuStar Energy was composed of a 2% general partner interest, incentive distribution rights and an approximate 18.4% and 20.3% limited partner interest, respectively.
7
Table of Contents
NUSTAR GP HOLDINGS, LLC
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Summary Financial Information
Condensed consolidated financial information reported by NuStar Energy is presented below (in thousands of dollars):
June 30, 2008 | December 31, 2007 | |||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||
Balance Sheet Information: | ||||||
Current assets | $ | 1,034,946 | $ | 347,134 | ||
Property, plant and equipment, net | 2,981,902 | 2,492,086 | ||||
Goodwill | 784,494 | 785,019 | ||||
Other long-term assets, net | 194,054 | 158,848 | ||||
Total assets | $ | 4,995,396 | $ | 3,783,087 | ||
Current liabilities | $ | 533,968 | $ | 242,485 | ||
Long-term debt, less current portion | 2,166,355 | 1,445,626 | ||||
Other long-term liabilities | 105,772 | 100,144 | ||||
Total liabilities | 2,806,095 | 1,788,255 | ||||
Partners’ equity | 2,189,301 | 1,994,832 | ||||
Total liabilities and partners’ equity | $ | 4,995,396 | $ | 3,783,087 | ||
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||
(Thousands of Dollars) | ||||||||||||
Statement of Income Information: | ||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 1,377,580 | $ | 321,032 | $ | 1,970,354 | $ | 617,856 | ||||
Operating income | 40,362 | 42,086 | 105,548 | 87,521 | ||||||||
Net income | 14,090 | 39,697 | 69,959 | 70,820 |
Other
As of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, our investment in NuStar Energy reconciles to NuStar Energy’s total partners’ equity as follows:
June 30, 2008 | December 31, 2007 | |||||||
(Thousands of Dollars) | ||||||||
NuStar Energy’s total partners’ equity | $ | 2,189,301 | $ | 1,994,832 | ||||
NuStar GP Holdings’ ownership interest in NuStar Energy | 20.4 | % | 22.3 | % | ||||
NuStar GP Holdings’ share of NuStar Energy’s partners’ equity | 446,617 | 444,848 | ||||||
Step-up in basis related to NuStar Energy’s assets and liabilities, including equity method goodwill, and other | 102,961 | 112,139 | ||||||
Investment in NuStar Energy | $ | 549,578 | $ | 556,987 | ||||
8
Table of Contents
NUSTAR GP HOLDINGS, LLC
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
4. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
We manage NuStar Energy through our ownership of NuStar GP, LLC, and Riverwalk Holdings LLC, which own Riverwalk Logistics, L.P., the general partner of NuStar Energy. Our officers are also officers of NuStar GP, LLC. The Chairman of our Board of Directors, William E. Greehey, is also the Chairman of the Board of Directors of NuStar GP, LLC. The Board of Directors of NuStar GP, LLC is responsible for overseeing NuStar GP, LLC’s role as the general partner of the general partner of NuStar Energy, and we, as the sole owner of NuStar GP, LLC, must also approve matters that have or would reasonably be expected to have a material effect on our interests as the sole owner of NuStar GP, LLC.
We had a receivable from NuStar Energy of $3.1 million and a payable to NuStar Energy of $0.8 million, as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, with both amounts representing payroll and plan benefits, net of payments made to us. We also had a long-term receivable of $6.7 million and $5.7 million from NuStar Energy as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, related to amounts payable for retiree medical benefits and other post-employment benefits. Expenses for payroll and related benefit plans and for stock-based compensation charged by us to NuStar Energy were $40.4 million and $31.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $74.6 million and $62.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
GP Services Agreement
On April 24, 2008, the boards of directors of each of NuStar GP, LLC and NuStar GP Holdings approved (i) the termination of the administration agreement, dated July 16, 2006, between NuStar GP Holdings and NuStar GP, LLC (the Administration Agreement) and (ii) the adoption of a services agreement between NuStar GP, LLC and NuStar Energy (the GP Services Agreement). All employees providing services to both NuStar GP Holdings and NuStar Energy are employed by NuStar GP, LLC.
Under the Administration Agreement, we paid annual charges of $500,000, subject to certain adjustments, to NuStar GP, LLC in return for NuStar GP, LLC’s provision of all executive management, accounting, legal, cash management, corporate finance and other administrative services to us. We also reimbursed NuStar GP, LLC for all direct public company costs and any other direct costs, such as outside legal and accounting fees, that NuStar GP, LLC incurred while providing services to us.
In connection with the termination of the Administration Agreement, NuStar Energy and NuStar GP, LLC entered into the GP Services Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2008. The GP Services Agreement provides that NuStar GP, LLC will furnish all administrative services necessary for the conduct of the business of NuStar Energy and NuStar Energy will reimburse NuStar GP, LLC for all costs, other than the expenses allocated to us (the Holdco Administrative Services Expense).
For the fiscal year 2008, the Holdco Administrative Services Expense will be equal to $750,000, plus 1.0% of NuStar GP, LLC’s domestic bonus and unit compensation expense for the 2008 fiscal year and subject to certain other adjustments. The GP Services Agreement will terminate on December 31, 2012, with automatic two-year renewals unless terminated by either party upon six months’ prior written notice. The aggregate amounts we incurred related to the Administration Agreement and the GP Services Agreement were $0.3 million and $0.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $0.4 million and $0.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
5. DISTRIBUTIONS FROM NUSTAR ENERGY L.P.
NuStar Energy’s partnership agreement, as amended, determines the amount and priority of cash distributions that NuStar Energy’s common unitholders and general partner may receive. We, as NuStar Energy’s general partner, are entitled to incentive distributions if the amount NuStar Energy distributes with respect to any quarter exceeds $0.60 per unit, with the maximum percentage of 23% of the amount of any quarterly distribution in excess of $0.66 per unit. We also receive a 2% distribution with respect to our general partner interest.
9
Table of Contents
NUSTAR GP HOLDINGS, LLC
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
The following table reflects the allocation of NuStar Energy’s cash distributions earned for the periods indicated among its general and limited partners:
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||
(Thousands of Dollars, except per unit data) | ||||||||||||
General partner interest (2%) | $ | 1,211 | $ | 997 | $ | 2,422 | $ | 1,951 | ||||
General partner incentive distribution | 5,718 | 4,413 | 11,436 | 8,323 | ||||||||
Total general partner distribution | 6,929 | 5,410 | 13,858 | 10,274 | ||||||||
Limited partner distribution | 10,064 | 9,714 | 20,131 | 19,073 | ||||||||
Total distributions to NuStar GP Holdings | 16,993 | 15,124 | 33,989 | 29,347 | ||||||||
Public unitholders’ distributions | 43,580 | 34,755 | 87,157 | 68,227 | ||||||||
Total cash distributions | $ | 60,573 | $ | 49,879 | $ | 121,146 | $ | 97,574 | ||||
Cash distributions per unit applicable to limited partners | $ | 0.985 | $ | 0.950 | $ | 1.970 | $ | 1.865 | ||||
In April 2008, NuStar Energy declared a quarterly cash distribution of $0.985 which was paid on May 14, 2008 to unitholders of record on May 7, 2008. This distribution related to the first quarter of 2008 and totaled $60.6 million. In July 2008, NuStar Energy declared a quarterly cash distribution of $0.985 per unit related to the second quarter of 2008. This distribution will be paid on August 13, 2008 to unitholders of record on August 6, 2008 and will total $60.6 million.
6. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” Statement No. 157, as amended, defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measures. The FASB deferred the effective date of Statement No. 157 for one year for all nonfinancial assets and liabilities, except for those items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). We have applied the recognition and disclosure provisions of Statement No. 157 for financial assets and liabilities and for nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are re-measured at least annually as of January 1, 2008.
Statement No. 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy, which segregates the inputs used in measuring fair value into three levels: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists.
The following liabilities are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2008:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
(Thousands of Dollars) | ||||||||||||
Accrued compensation expense: | ||||||||||||
Restricted units | $ | 3,375 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 3,375 | ||||
Unit options | — | 956 | — | 956 | ||||||||
Total | $ | 3,375 | $ | 956 | $ | — | $ | 4,331 | ||||
The fair value of restricted units is determined using the unit price at the valuation date. The fair value of each unit option grant is determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model on the valuation date based on the expected life of options granted, expected volatility, expected dividend yield and the risk-free interest rate. As of December 31, 2007, accrued compensation expense related to restricted units and unit options totaled $3.7 million.
10
Table of Contents
NUSTAR GP HOLDINGS, LLC
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
7. STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Changes in current assets and liabilities were as follows:
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
(Thousands of Dollars) | ||||||||
Decrease (increase) in current assets: | ||||||||
Accounts receivable | $ | (596 | ) | $ | 521 | |||
Receivable from NuStar Energy | (2,777 | ) | (2,095 | ) | ||||
Income tax receivable | 1,259 | (1,431 | ) | |||||
Prepaid expenses | 115 | 120 | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in current liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts payable | 232 | 268 | ||||||
Payable to NuStar Energy | (786 | ) | — | |||||
Income taxes payable | — | (811 | ) | |||||
Accrued compensation expense | 1,152 | 3,912 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities | (394 | ) | (279 | ) | ||||
Taxes other than income taxes | (714 | ) | 470 | |||||
Changes in current assets and liabilities | $ | (2,509 | ) | $ | 675 | |||
Cash flows related to interest and income taxes were as follows:
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||
(Thousands of Dollars) | ||||||
Cash paid for interest | $ | 102 | $ | 13 | ||
Cash paid for income taxes | $ | 68 | $ | 972 | ||
8. CREDIT FACILITY
On July 19, 2006, we entered into a three-year revolving credit facility with a borrowing capacity of up to $20 million (the Credit Facility) to enable us to manage our cash flow obligations. We expect to fund capital contributions to NuStar Energy to maintain our 2% general partner interest in the event NuStar Energy issues additional units and meet other liquidity and capital resource requirements through borrowings under the Credit Facility.
As amended on December 18, 2007, the terms of the Credit Facility require NuStar Energy to maintain a total debt-to-EBITDA ratio of less than 5.0-to-1.0 for any four consecutive quarters, subject to adjustment following certain acquisitions. We are also required to receive cash distributions of at least $25.0 million in respect to our ownership interests in NuStar Energy for the preceding four fiscal quarters ending on the last day of each fiscal quarter. Our management believes that we are in compliance with the ratio and covenants as of June 30, 2008.
In April 2008, we borrowed $5.0 million under our credit facility to fund our $5.0 million contribution to NuStar Energy in order to maintain our 2% general partner interest following NuStar Energy’s issuance of common units. As of June 30, 2008, we had outstanding borrowings of $8.0 million under the Credit Facility. The Credit Facility bears interest based on either an alternative base rate or a LIBOR-based rate, which was 3.0% as of June 30, 2008.
9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Litigation and Environmental Matters
We are not currently a party to any material legal proceedings. However, NuStar Energy is subject to certain loss contingencies, the outcome of which could have an effect on NuStar Energy’s results of operations and ability to pay distributions, which would impact our results of operations and ability to pay distributions. NuStar Energy’s most significant contingent liabilities resulting from various litigation, claims and commitments are discussed below.
11
Table of Contents
NUSTAR GP HOLDINGS, LLC
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Grace Energy Corporation Matter.In 1997, Grace Energy Corporation (Grace Energy) sued subsidiaries of Kaneb Pipe Line Partners, L.P. (KPP) and Kaneb Services LLC (KSL and, collectively with KPP and their respective subsidiaries, Kaneb) in Texas state court. The complaint sought recovery of the cost of remediation of fuel leaks in the 1970s from a pipeline that had once connected a former Grace Energy terminal with Otis Air Force Base in Massachusetts (Otis AFB). Grace Energy alleges the Otis AFB pipeline and related environmental liabilities had been transferred in 1978 to an entity that was part of Kaneb’s acquisition of Support Terminal Services, Inc. and its subsidiaries from Grace Energy in 1993. Kaneb contends that it did not acquire the Otis AFB pipeline and never assumed any responsibility for any associated environmental damage.
In 2000, the court entered final judgment that: (i) Grace Energy could not recover its own remediation costs of $3.5 million, (ii) Kaneb owned the Otis AFB pipeline and its related environmental liabilities and (iii) Grace Energy was awarded $1.8 million in attorney costs. Both Kaneb and Grace Energy appealed the final judgment of the trial court to the Texas Court of Appeals in Dallas. In 2001, Grace Energy filed a petition in bankruptcy, which created an automatic stay of actions against Grace Energy. Once that stay is lifted, NuStar Energy intends to resume vigorous prosecution of the appeal.
The Otis AFB is a part of a Superfund Site pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA). The site contains a number of groundwater contamination plumes, two of which are allegedly associated with the Otis AFB pipeline. Relying on the final judgment of the Texas state court assigning ownership of the Otis AFB pipeline to Kaneb, the U.S. Department of Justice (the DOJ) advised Kaneb in 2001 that it intends to seek reimbursement from Kaneb for the remediation costs associated with the two spill areas. In 2002, the DOJ asserted that it had incurred over $49.0 million in costs and expected to incur additional costs of approximately $19.0 million for remediation of the two spill areas. The DOJ has not filed a lawsuit against NuStar Energy related to this matter, and NuStar Energy has not made any payments toward costs incurred by the DOJ.
Department of Justice Matter. The DOJ advised NuStar Pipeline Operating Partnership L.P. (NuPOP) that Region VII of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the EPA) has requested that the DOJ initiate a lawsuit against NuPOP for (a) failing to prepare adequate Facility Response Plans, as required by Section 311(j)(5) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §1321(j), for certain of its pipeline terminals located in Region VII by August 30, 1994, and (b) maintaining Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure Plans (SPCC Plans) at the terminal that deviate from the SPCC regulations, 40 C.F.R. §112.3. A Facility Response Plan is a plan for responding to a worst case discharge, and to a substantial threat of such a discharge, of oil or hazardous substances. The SPCC rule requires specific facilities to prepare, amend and implement plans to prevent, prepare and respond to oil discharges to navigable waters and adjoining shorelines. NuStar Energy is currently in settlement negotiations with the DOJ to resolve these matters.
EPA Investigation.On November 14, 2006, agents of the EPA presented a search warrant issued by a U.S. District Court at a terminal owned by Shore Terminals, LLC (Shore), a wholly owned subsidiary of NuPOP. Since then, NuStar Energy and Shore have been served with additional subpoenas. The search warrant and subpoenas all seek information regarding allegations of potential illegal conduct by Shore, certain of its affiliates and/or its employees concerning compliance with certain environmental and safety laws and regulations. NuStar Energy has cooperated fully with the U.S. Attorney and the EPA and in producing documents in response to the subpoenas. Although the U.S. Attorney has indicated that they intend to seek criminal penalties and fines as a result of alleged violations of environmental laws at the terminal, NuStar Energy is currently in negotiations with the U.S. Attorney and the EPA to resolve this matter.
There can be no assurances that the conclusion of the U.S. Attorney’s and EPA’s investigation will not result in a determination that Shore violated applicable laws. If Shore is found to have violated such laws, NuStar Energy could be subject to fines, civil penalties and criminal penalties. A final determination that Shore violated applicable laws could, among other things, result in debarment from future federal government contracts. If any of the consequences described above ultimately occur, it is reasonably possible that the effects could be material to NuStar Energy’s results of operations in the period NuStar Energy would be required to record a liability, and could be material to NuStar Energy’s cash flows in the periods NuStar Energy would be required to pay such liability.
12
Table of Contents
NUSTAR GP HOLDINGS, LLC
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
Other
NuStar Energy is also a party to additional claims and legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. NuStar Energy believes the possibility is remote that the final outcome of any of these claims or proceedings to which it is a party would have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or liquidity; however, due to the inherent uncertainty of litigation, there can be no assurance that the resolution of any particular claim or proceeding would not have a material adverse effect on NuStar Energy’s results of operations, financial position or liquidity.
10. MEMBERS’ EQUITY AND NET INCOME PER UNIT
We calculate basic net income per unit by dividing net income by the weighted average number of units outstanding for the period. Diluted net income per unit is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of units outstanding and the effect of unit options and non-vested restricted units granted under the NuStar GP Holdings 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan calculated using the treasury stock method. Net income per unit amounts were computed as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||
(Thousands of Dollars, Except Unit and Per Unit data) | ||||||||||||
Basic Net Income per Unit: | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 5,780 | $ | 11,248 | $ | 20,783 | $ | 20,019 | ||||
Weighted average number of basic units outstanding | 42,500,990 | 42,500,000 | 42,500,990 | 42,500,000 | ||||||||
Basic net income per unit | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.26 | $ | 0.49 | $ | 0.47 | ||||
Diluted Net Income per Unit: | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 5,780 | $ | 11,248 | $ | 20,783 | $ | 20,019 | ||||
Weighted average number of basic units outstanding | 42,500,990 | 42,500,000 | 42,500,990 | 42,500,000 | ||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities | 7,273 | 1,705 | 3,580 | 1,540 | ||||||||
Weighted average number of dilutive units outstanding | 42,508,263 | 42,501,705 | 42,504,570 | 42,501,540 | ||||||||
Diluted net income per unit | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.26 | $ | 0.49 | $ | 0.47 | ||||
The computation of diluted net income per unit excludes unit options outstanding with an exercise price above market, as their effect would be anti-dilutive. All 324,100 unit options outstanding had an exercise price above the average market price for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008. No unit options were granted prior to the fourth quarter of 2007.
The following table presents changes to our members’ equity (in thousands):
Balance as of December 31, 2007 | $ | 553,786 | ||
Net income | 20,783 | |||
Distributions to unitholders | (30,600 | ) | ||
Share of NuStar Energy’s other comprehensive income | (750 | ) | ||
SAB 51 charge | (757 | ) | ||
Unit based compensation | 495 | |||
Other | 6 | |||
Balance as of June 30, 2008 | $ | 542,963 | ||
13
Table of Contents
NUSTAR GP HOLDINGS, LLC
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
In April 2008, NuStar Energy issued 5,050,800 common units to the public, which reduced our ownership from 22.3% at December 31, 2007 to 20.4%. This issuance resulted in a decrease in the value of our proportionate share of NuStar Energy’s capital totaling $0.8 million (SAB 51 charge). We recorded the SAB 51 charge as a reduction in our investment in NuStar Energy and as a reduction to members’ equity for the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Comprehensive Income
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the difference between our net income and our comprehensive income resulted mainly from our proportionate share of NuStar Energy’s other comprehensive income. Our total comprehensive income was as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||
(Thousands of Dollars) | ||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 5,780 | $ | 11,248 | $ | 20,783 | $ | 20,019 | ||||||
Share of NuStar Energy L.P.’s other comprehensive (loss) income | (20 | ) | 2,420 | (750 | ) | 2,656 | ||||||||
Other | 4 | 6 | 8 | 11 | ||||||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 5,764 | $ | 13,674 | $ | 20,041 | $ | 22,686 | ||||||
Cash Distributions
In April 2008, our board of directors declared a quarterly cash distribution of $0.36 per unit related to the first quarter of 2008. This distribution was paid on May 16, 2008 to unitholders of record on May 7, 2008 and totaled $15.3 million. In July 2008, our board of directors declared a quarterly cash distribution of $0.36 per unit related to the second quarter of 2008. This distribution will be paid on August 15, 2008 to unitholders of record on August 6, 2008 and will total $15.3 million.
11. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS AND UNIT BASED COMPENSATION
NuStar Energy reimburses us for its share of costs incurred by us related to employee benefit plans and long-term incentive plans. Expenses resulting from NuStar GP Holdings awards to our non-employee directors are included in “General and administrative expenses” on our consolidated statements of income. Our liabilities for employee benefits are included in “Employee benefit plan liabilities” and our liability related to the long-term incentive plans is included in “Accrued compensation expense” on our consolidated balance sheets.
The following table summarizes information pertaining to long-term incentive plan compensation expenses:
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||
(Thousands of Dollars) | ||||||||||||
Long-term incentive plan compensation expense charged to NuStar Energy | $ | 797 | $ | 1,675 | $ | 1,068 | $ | 4,669 | ||||
Expenses resulting from NuStar GP Holdings awards to non-employee directors | $ | — | $ | 6 | $ | 192 | $ | 9 |
14
Table of Contents
NUSTAR GP HOLDINGS, LLC
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
The components of net periodic benefit cost related to our defined benefit plans were as follows:
Pension Plans (a) | Other Postretirement Benefit Plans | |||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||
(Thousands of Dollars) | ||||||||||||||
For the three months ended June 30: | ||||||||||||||
Components of net periodic benefit cost: | ||||||||||||||
Service cost | $ | 1,889 | $ | 1,932 | $ | 153 | $ | 141 | ||||||
Interest cost | 188 | 72 | 135 | 103 | ||||||||||
Expected return on assets | (248 | ) | (78 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
Amortization of net loss | 4 | 6 | — | — | ||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost | $ | 1,833 | $ | 1,932 | $ | 288 | $ | 244 | ||||||
For the six months ended June 30: | ||||||||||||||
Components of net periodic benefit cost: | ||||||||||||||
Service cost | $ | 3,516 | $ | 3,864 | $ | 288 | $ | 282 | ||||||
Interest cost | 376 | 143 | 253 | 206 | ||||||||||
Expected return on assets | (496 | ) | (156 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
Amortization of net loss | 8 | 11 | — | — | ||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost | $ | 3,404 | $ | 3,862 | $ | 541 | $ | 488 | ||||||
(a) | Includes amounts related to the pension plan, the excess pension plan and the supplemental executive retirement plan. |
15
Table of Contents
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Form 10-Q contains certain estimates, predictions, projections, assumptions and other forward-looking statements that involve various risks and uncertainties. While these forward-looking statements, and any assumptions upon which they are based, are made in good faith and reflect our current judgment regarding the direction of our business, actual results will almost always vary, sometimes materially, from any estimates, predictions, projections, assumptions or other future performance suggested in this report. These forward-looking statements can generally be identified by the words “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends,” “estimates,” “forecasts,” “budgets,” “projects,” “will,” “could,” “should,” “may” and similar expressions. These statements reflect our current views with regard to future events and are subject to various risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Please read our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, Part I “Risk Factors,” as well as our subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, Part II, Item 1A “Risk Factors,” for a discussion of certain of those risks, uncertainties and assumptions.
If one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or if the underlying assumptions prove incorrect, our actual results may vary materially from those described in any forward-looking statement. Other unknown or unpredictable factors could also have material adverse effects on our future results. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on this forward-looking information, which is as of the date of this Form 10-Q. We do not intend to update these statements unless it is required by the securities laws to do so, and we undertake no obligation to publicly release the result of any revisions to any such forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
Overview
NuStar GP Holdings, LLC (NuStar GP Holdings) (NYSE: NSH) is a publicly held Delaware limited liability company. As used in this report, references to “we,” “us,” or “our” collectively refer, depending on the context, to NuStar GP Holdings or a wholly owned subsidiary.
Our only cash generating assets are our ownership interests in NuStar Energy L.P. a publicly held Delaware limited partnership (NuStar Energy) (NYSE: NS). As of June 30, 2008 our aggregate ownership interests in NuStar Energy consist of the following:
• | the 2% general partner interest in NuStar Energy, which we hold through our 100% ownership interest in Riverwalk Logistics, L.P.; |
• | 100% of the incentive distribution rights issued by NuStar Energy, which entitle us to receive increasing percentages of the cash distributed by NuStar Energy, currently at the maximum percentage of 23%; and |
• | 10,218,708 common units of NuStar Energy representing an 18.4% limited partner interest in NuStar Energy. |
We account for our ownership interest in NuStar Energy using the equity method. Therefore, our financial results reflect a portion of NuStar Energy’s net income based on our ownership interest. We have no separate operating activities apart from those conducted by NuStar Energy and therefore generate no revenues from operations.
NuStar Energy is engaged in crude oil and refined product transportation, liquid terminalling and storage, and asphalt and fuels marketing. NuStar Energy has terminal facilities in the United States, the Netherland Antilles, Canada, Mexico, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. NuStar Energy conducts substantially all of its business through its wholly owned subsidiaries, NuStar Logistics, L.P. and NuStar Pipeline Operating Partnership L.P.
NuStar Energy is required by its partnership agreement to distribute all of its available cash at the end of each quarter, less reserves established by its general partner in its sole discretion to provide for the proper conduct of NuStar Energy’s business or to provide funds for future distributions. Similarly, we are required by our limited liability company agreement to distribute all of our available cash at the end of each quarter, less reserves established by our board of directors.
16
Table of Contents
Recent Developments
On March 20, 2008, NuStar Energy completed the acquisition of CITGO Asphalt Refining Company’s asphalt operations and assets (the East Coast Asphalt Operations) for approximately $808.5 million. The East Coast Asphalt Operations include a 74,000 barrels-per-day (BPD) asphalt refinery in Paulsboro, New Jersey, a 30,000 BPD asphalt refinery in Savannah, Georgia and three asphalt terminals on the East Coast with a combined storage capacity of 4.8 million barrels.
In April 2008, NuStar Energy issued 5,050,800 common units representing limited partner interests at a price of $48.75 per unit. NuStar Energy received proceeds of $236.2 million, net of issuance cost. In April 2008, we borrowed $5.0 million under our credit facility to fund our $5.0 million contribution to NuStar Energy in order to maintain our 2% general partner interest. Following NuStar Energy’s issuance of common units, our limited partner interest in NuStar Energy was reduced to 18.4%.
Results of Operations
As discussed above, we account for our investment in NuStar Energy using the equity method. As a result, our equity in earnings of NuStar Energy, our only source of income, directly fluctuates with the amount of NuStar Energy’s distributions, which determines the amount of our incentive distribution earnings, and NuStar Energy’s results of operations, which determine the amounts of earnings attributable to our general partner and limited partner interests.
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2007
Financial Highlights
(Unaudited, Thousands of Dollars, Except Unit and Per Unit Data)
Three Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | Change | ||||||||||
Equity in earnings of NuStar Energy | $ | 6,704 | $ | 11,951 | $ | (5,247 | ) | |||||
General and administrative expenses | (824 | ) | (747 | ) | (77 | ) | ||||||
Other (expense) income, net | (82 | ) | 24 | (106 | ) | |||||||
Interest (expense) income, net | (67 | ) | 18 | (85 | ) | |||||||
Income before income tax benefit | 5,731 | 11,246 | (5,515 | ) | ||||||||
Income tax benefit | 49 | 2 | 47 | |||||||||
Net income | $ | 5,780 | $ | 11,248 | $ | (5,468 | ) | |||||
Basic net income per unit | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.26 | $ | (0.12 | ) | |||||
Weighted average number of basic units outstanding | 42,500,990 | 42,500,000 | 990 | |||||||||
17
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes NuStar Energy’s results of operations:
Three Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | Change | ||||||||
(Thousands of Dollars, Except Per Unit Data) | ||||||||||
NuStar Energy Statement of Income Data: | ||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 1,377,580 | $ | 321,032 | $ | 1,056,548 | ||||
Cost of product sales | 1,175,916 | 148,061 | 1,027,855 | |||||||
Operating expenses | 106,928 | 85,444 | 21,484 | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 34,830 | 27,860 | 6,970 | |||||||
Segment operating income | 59,906 | 59,667 | 239 | |||||||
General and administrative expenses | 19,544 | 17,581 | 1,963 | |||||||
Operating income | $ | 40,362 | $ | 42,086 | $ | (1,724 | ) | |||
Net income | $ | 14,090 | $ | 39,697 | $ | (25,607 | ) | |||
Net income per unit applicable to limited partners | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.74 | $ | (0.59 | ) | |||
Cash distributions per unit applicable to limited partners | $ | 0.985 | $ | 0.950 | $ | 0.035 |
NuStar Energy’s net income decreased $25.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007, primarily due to a decrease in other income, and an increase in interest expense. NuStar Energy’s segment operating income increased slightly for the three months ended June 30, 2008, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007, primarily due to a $10.2 million increase in operating income for the transportation segment and a $5.1 million increase in operating income for the storage segment, offset by a $14.2 million decrease in operating income for the asphalt and fuels marketing segment.
NuStar Energy’s segment operating income during the three months ended June 30, 2008 increased slightly due to a fire at the Valero Energy McKee refinery in February 2007, which shut down the refinery until mid-April 2007 and negatively impacted throughputs and earnings for its transportation and storage segments during the three months ended June 30, 2007. NuStar Energy’s earnings were also positively impacted by the leasing of new storage capacity from completed tank expansion projects.
The earnings of the asphalt and fuels marketing segment were negatively impacted by a hedging loss associated with certain NYMEX crude oil and intermediate product futures contracts entered into concurrently with the acquisition of the East Coast Asphalt Operations.
The following table summarizes our equity in earnings of NuStar Energy:
Three Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | Change | ||||||||||
(Thousands of Dollars) | ||||||||||||
NuStar GP Holdings’ Equity in Earnings of NuStar Energy: | ||||||||||||
General partner interest | $ | 167 | $ | 705 | $ | (538 | ) | |||||
General partner incentive distribution | 5,718 | 4,413 | 1,305 | |||||||||
General partner’s interest in net income and incentive distributions of NuStar Energy | 5,885 | 5,118 | 767 | |||||||||
NuStar GP Holdings’ limited partner interest in net income of NuStar Energy | 1,540 | 7,554 | (6,014 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of step-up in basis related to NuStar Energy’s assets and liabilities | (721 | ) | (721 | ) | — | |||||||
NuStar GP Holdings’ equity in earnings of NuStar Energy | $ | 6,704 | $ | 11,951 | $ | (5,247 | ) | |||||
18
Table of Contents
Lower earnings at NuStar Energy for the three months ended June 30, 2008 caused a decrease in equity earnings related to our general partner interest for the three months ended June 30, 2008, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007.
NuStar Energy’s per unit distributions for the three months ended June 30, 2008 increased compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007, to $0.985 from $0.950. That increase, coupled with an increase in the number of NuStar Energy units outstanding resulting from the issuance of units in the fourth quarter of 2007 and the second quarter of 2008, resulted in NuStar Energy increasing its total cash distributions. Because our incentive distribution rights entitle us to an increasing amount of NuStar Energy’s cash distributions, our equity in earnings of NuStar Energy related to our incentive distribution rights also increased for that period.
Our equity in earnings of NuStar Energy related to our limited partner units decreased for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007, due to a decrease in NuStar Energy’s net income per unit during that period.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2007
Financial Highlights
(Unaudited, Thousands of Dollars, Except Unit and Per Unit Data)
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | Change | ||||||||||
Equity in earnings of NuStar Energy | $ | 22,458 | $ | 21,508 | $ | 950 | ||||||
General and administrative expenses | (1,566 | ) | (1,543 | ) | (23 | ) | ||||||
Other expense, net | (82 | ) | (2 | ) | (80 | ) | ||||||
Interest (expense) income, net | (96 | ) | 14 | (110 | ) | |||||||
Income before income tax benefit | 20,714 | 19,977 | 737 | |||||||||
Income tax benefit | 69 | 42 | 27 | |||||||||
Net income | $ | 20,783 | $ | 20,019 | $ | 764 | ||||||
Basic net income per unit | $ | 0.49 | $ | 0.47 | $ | 0.02 | ||||||
Weighted average number of basic units outstanding | 42,500,990 | 42,500,000 | 990 | |||||||||
19
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes NuStar Energy’s results of operations:
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | Change | ||||||||
(Thousands of Dollars, Except Per Unit Data) | ||||||||||
NuStar Energy Statement of Income Data: | ||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 1,970,354 | $ | 617,856 | $ | 1,352,498 | ||||
Cost of product sales | 1,568,925 | 275,988 | 1,292,937 | |||||||
Operating expenses | 195,378 | 166,656 | 28,722 | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 64,876 | 55,202 | 9,674 | |||||||
Segment operating income | 141,175 | 120,010 | 21,165 | |||||||
General and administrative expenses | 35,627 | 32,489 | 3,138 | |||||||
Operating income | $ | 105,548 | $ | 87,521 | $ | 18,027 | ||||
Net income | $ | 69,959 | $ | 70,820 | $ | (861 | ) | |||
Net income per unit applicable to limited partners | $ | 1.12 | $ | 1.31 | $ | (0.19 | ) | |||
Cash distributions per unit applicable to limited partners | $ | 1.970 | $ | 1.865 | $ | 0.105 |
NuStar Energy’s net income decreased $0.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007, primarily due to a decrease in other income and increases in interest expense, general and administrative expenses and income tax expense, partially offset by an increase in segment operating income. NuStar Energy’s segment operating income increased $21.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007, primarily due to a $17.7 million increase in operating income for the transportation segment and a $16.5 million increase in the storage segment, partially offset by a decrease of $11.4 million in operating income in the asphalt and fuels marketing segment.
NuStar Energy’s segment operating income increased during the six months ended June 30, 2008 due to a fire at the Valero Energy McKee refinery in February 2007, which shut down the refinery until mid-April 2007 and negatively impacted throughputs and earnings for its transportation and storage segments during the six months ended June 30, 2007. NuStar Energy’s earnings were also positively impacted by the leasing of new storage capacity from completed tank expansion projects.
The earnings of the asphalt and fuels marketing segment were negatively impacted by a hedging loss associated with certain NYMEX crude oil and intermediate product futures contracts entered into concurrently with the acquisition of the East Coast Asphalt Operations.
The following table summarizes our equity in earnings of NuStar Energy:
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | Change | ||||||||||
(Thousands of Dollars) | ||||||||||||
NuStar GP Holdings’ Equity in Earnings of NuStar Energy: | ||||||||||||
General partner interest | $ | 1,181 | $ | 1,249 | $ | (68 | ) | |||||
General partner incentive distribution (a) | 10,906 | 8,323 | 2,583 | |||||||||
General partner’s interest in net income and incentive distributions of NuStar Energy | 12,087 | 9,572 | 2,515 | |||||||||
NuStar GP Holdings’ limited partner interest in net income of NuStar Energy | 11,813 | 13,378 | (1,565 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of step-up in basis related to NuStar Energy’s assets and liabilities | (1,442 | ) | (1,442 | ) | — | |||||||
NuStar GP Holdings’ equity in earnings of NuStar Energy | $ | 22,458 | $ | 21,508 | $ | 950 | ||||||
(a) | NuStar Energy’s net income allocation to general and limited partners for the first quarter of 2008 reflected total cash distributions based upon the partnership interests outstanding as of March 31, 2008. NuStar Energy issued approximately 5.1 million common units in April 2008. Actual distribution payments are made within 45 days after the end of each quarter as of a record date that is set after the end of each quarter. As a result, our portion of the actual cash payment made with respect to the first quarter 2008, including the incentive distribution rights, was greater than the net income allocated to us shown in the table above. |
20
Table of Contents
Lower earnings at NuStar Energy for the six months ended June 30, 2008 caused a decrease in equity earnings related to our general partner interest for the six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007.
NuStar Energy’s per unit distributions for the six months ended June 30, 2008 increased compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007, to $1.970 from $1.865. That increase, coupled with an increase in the number of NuStar Energy units outstanding resulting from the issuance of units in the fourth quarter of 2007 and the second quarter of 2008, resulted in NuStar Energy increasing its total cash distributions. Because our incentive distribution rights entitle us to an increasing amount of NuStar Energy’s cash distributions, our equity in earnings of NuStar Energy related to our incentive distribution rights also increased for that period.
Our equity in earnings of NuStar Energy related to our limited partner units decreased for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007, due to a decrease in NuStar Energy’s net income per unit during that period.
Outlook
Storage Segment Outlook
We believe certain trends in the market are providing NuStar Energy further terminalling opportunities for a number of reasons, including:
• | volatility in the energy markets and the willingness of energy traders to take physical positions at storage facilities in order to enhance profits; |
• | growing governmental regulation mandating cleaner fuels, such as ethanol and biofuels, which provide logistical opportunities; |
• | geopolitical factors, which cause concern over the security of supply; and |
• | arbitrage opportunities such as those between the gasoline-short U.S. and diesel-short Europe, which continue to enhance storage opportunities. |
The markets in which NuStar Energy is constructing additional storage capacity are strategically located marine terminal facilities on the U.S. East, West and Gulf Coasts, as well as at its facilities in St. Eustatius in the Netherlands Antilles and Amsterdam.
During 2007 and in 2008, NuStar Energy completed key terminal expansion projects and commenced construction on other significant terminal expansion projects, which it expects to positively impact its operations in 2008.
Transportation Segment Outlook
We do not expect a material impact to NuStar Energy’s throughputs as a result of high fuel prices, although we do expect lower throughputs compared to its recent averages. However, turnarounds or outages at NuStar Energy’s customers’ refineries have a significant effect on its pipeline results, as do maintenance expenses and market conditions. Barring any major unplanned turnaround activity or significant adverse economic condition, we expect NuStar Energy’s transportation segment throughputs to be higher this year compared to 2007, due to the reduced throughputs in 2007 as a result of the impact of the fire at Valero Energy’s McKee refinery in 2007. Additionally, effective July 1st, NuStar Energy increased the tariffs on its pipelines, which we expect will offset the decline in its throughputs from lower demand.
Asphalt and Fuels Marketing Segment Outlook
The earnings of NuStar Energy’s asphalt and fuels marketing segment largely depend upon the margin earned by the East Coast Asphalt Operations resulting from the difference between the sales prices of its products and the purchase prices of its raw materials, principally crude oil. The prices of crude oil and the products produced by the East Coast Asphalt Operations fluctuate in response to many factors beyond NuStar Energy’s control, such as changes in supply,
21
Table of Contents
demand, market uncertainties and other factors. Crude oil prices and prices for the products produced by the East Coast Asphalt Operations may not fluctuate in tandem. Specifically, increases in asphalt prices lagged behind the significant increase in crude oil prices that occurred in the second quarter. Currently, the supply of asphalt is constrained, which is resulting in continued high asphalt prices and margins despite a recent decline in crude oil prices. Factors causing these supply constraints include lower than normal inventories on the U.S. East Coast and reduced production at fuels refineries, which also produce asphalt, due to weak gasoline margins. We expect these supply constraints to continue through the third quarter.
Due to these factors, we expect NuStar Energy’s asphalt margins to improve in the third quarter compared to the second quarter. In the fourth quarter, we expect NuStar Energy’s asphalt sales and margins to decline due to typical seasonal factors including decreased road construction during colder months.
NuStar Energy enters into derivative contracts to minimize the effects of commodity price fluctuations on inventories associated with its asphalt and fuels marketing segment. The majority of NuStar Energy’s derivative contracts do not qualify for hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133. Its derivative contracts that do qualify for hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133 may not be perfectly effective in offsetting the change in the value of inventory, resulting in ineffectiveness. The change in the fair value of NuStar Energy’s derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting as well as the ineffectiveness resulting from its derivatives that do qualify for hedge accounting are included in NuStar Energy’s earnings each period. Currently, NuStar Energy does not have any derivative contracts related to inventories of the East Coast Asphalt Operations, and it is managing its commodity risk associated with those inventories by managing its physical volumes. NuStar Energy continues to monitor its exposure to commodity prices associated with the inventories of the East Coast Asphalt Operations and may, if conditions warrant, enter into derivative contracts in the future.
The operations of the East Coast Asphalt Operations require NuStar Energy to make substantial investments in inventory. Due to the seasonal nature of asphalt demand, NuStar Energy expects to build and store inventories during periods of lower demand in order to sell it during periods of higher demand. Therefore, NuStar Energy’s inventory balances are likely to fluctuate seasonally. These seasonal fluctuations cause significant changes in NuStar Energy’s working capital balances (primarily accounts receivable, inventories and accounts payable), that impact its liquidity.
Long-Term Outlook
Long-term, we believe strong demand for more energy infrastructure in the U.S. and internationally, a tight supply and demand balance and an expanding array of specialty products, including renewable fuels, will continue to drive the demand for NuStar Energy’s assets.
We also believe the fundamentals for the East Coast Asphalt Operations are positive. We expect that the upgrade projects currently being implemented or planned at various fuels refineries will limit the supply of residuum product used to make asphalt, which will continue to reduce the domestic supply of asphalt. We believe this reduced domestic supply and limited availability of economical imports will positively affect NuStar Energy’s asphalt margins.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
General
Our cash flows consist of distributions from NuStar Energy on our partnership interests, including all of the incentive distribution rights that we own. Due to our ownership of NuStar Energy’s incentive distribution rights, our portion of NuStar Energy’s total distributions may exceed our percentage ownership interest of 20.4%. Our primary cash requirements are for distributions to members, capital contributions to maintain our 2% general partner interest in NuStar Energy in the event NuStar Energy issues additional units, debt service requirements, if any, benefit plan funding and general and administrative expenses. In addition, because NuStar GP, LLC elected to be treated as a taxable entity, we may be required to pay income taxes, depending upon the taxable income of NuStar GP, LLC. These tax payments may exceed the amount of tax expense recorded on the Consolidated Financial Statements. We expect to fund our cash requirements primarily with the quarterly cash distributions we receive from NuStar Energy and borrowings on our three-year revolving credit facility, if necessary. Additionally, NuStar Energy reimburses us for the costs incurred on their behalf, primarily employee related costs.
22
Table of Contents
Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
Cash distributions received from NuStar Energy for the six months ended June 30, 2008 were $33.4 million compared to $28.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The cash distributions we received were used principally to fund distributions to our unitholders, which totaled $30.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to $27.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. Long-term debt borrowings of $5.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 were used to fund our $5.0 million contribution to NuStar Energy to maintain our 2% general partner interest following NuStar Energy’s issuance of common units in April 2008.
Investment in NuStar Energy
In April 2008, NuStar Energy issued approximately 5.1 million common units representing limited partner interests at a price of $48.75 per unit resulting in total proceeds of $236.2 million, net of issuance costs. In order to maintain our 2% general partner interest, we contributed $5.0 million to NuStar Energy.
Cash Distributions
Our limited liability company agreement requires that, within 50 days after the end of each quarter, we distribute all of our available cash to the holders of record of our units on the applicable record date. The table set forth below shows our cash distributions earned for the periods shown:
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||
(Thousands of Dollars, Except Per Unit Data) | ||||||||||||
Cash distributions per unit | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.34 | $ | 0.72 | $ | 0.66 | ||||
Total cash distributions | $ | 15,300 | $ | 14,450 | $ | 30,600 | $ | 28,050 |
Distributions declared for a quarter are paid by NuStar Energy within 45 days following the end of each quarter based on the partnership interests outstanding as of a record date that is set after the end of each quarter. The table set forth below shows NuStar Energy’s cash distributions to be paid related to the periods shown:
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
(Thousands of Dollars, Except Per Unit Data) | ||||||||||||||||
Cash distributions per unit | $ | 0.985 | $ | 0.950 | $ | 1.970 | $ | 1.865 | ||||||||
Total cash distributions by NuStar Energy to all partners | $ | 60,573 | $ | 49,879 | $ | 121,146 | $ | 97,574 | ||||||||
Cash distributions to us: | ||||||||||||||||
Distributions on our general partner interest (2%) | $ | 1,211 | $ | 997 | $ | 2,422 | $ | 1,951 | ||||||||
Distributions on our incentive distribution rights | 5,718 | 4,413 | 11,436 | 8,323 | ||||||||||||
Distributions on our limited partnership interests | 10,064 | 9,714 | 20,131 | 19,073 | ||||||||||||
Total cash distributions to us | $ | 16,993 | $ | 15,124 | $ | 33,989 | $ | 29,347 | ||||||||
Distributions to us as a percentage of total cash distributions | 28.1 | % | 30.3 | % | 28.1 | % | 30.1 | % |
Long-Term Contractual Obligations
Credit Facility
On July 19, 2006, we entered into a three-year revolving credit facility with a borrowing capacity of up to $20 million (the Credit Facility) to enable us to manage our cash flow obligations. We expect to fund capital contributions to NuStar Energy to maintain our 2% general partner interest in the event NuStar Energy issues additional units and meet other liquidity and capital resource requirements through borrowings under the Credit Facility.
As amended on December 18, 2007, the terms of the Credit Facility require NuStar Energy to maintain a total debt-to-EBITDA ratio of less than 5.0-to-1.0 for any four consecutive quarters, subject to adjustment following certain acquisitions. We are also required to receive cash distributions of at least $25.0 million in respect to our ownership
23
Table of Contents
interests in NuStar Energy for the preceding four fiscal quarters ending on the last day of each fiscal quarter. Our management believes that we are in compliance with the ratio and covenants as of June 30, 2008.
In April 2008, we borrowed $5.0 million under our credit facility to fund our $5.0 million contribution to NuStar Energy in order to maintain our 2% general partner interest following NuStar Energy’s issuance of common units. As of June 30, 2008, we had outstanding borrowings of $8.0 million under the Credit Facility. The Credit Facility bears interest based on either an alternative base rate or a LIBOR-based rate, which was 3.0% as of June 30, 2008.
Related Party Transactions
Employee Benefit Plans and Unit Based Compensation
NuStar Energy reimburses us for its share of costs incurred by us related to employee benefit plans and long-term incentive plans. Expenses resulting from NuStar GP Holdings awards to our non-employee directors are included in “General and administrative expenses” on our consolidated statements of income. Our liabilities for employee benefits are included in “Employee benefit plan liabilities” and our liability related to the long-term incentive plans is included in “Accrued compensation expense” on our consolidated balance sheets.
The following table summarizes information pertaining to long-term incentive plan compensation expenses:
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||
(Thousands of Dollars) | ||||||||||||
Long-term incentive plan compensation expense charged to NuStar Energy | $ | 797 | $ | 1,675 | $ | 1,068 | $ | 4,669 | ||||
Expenses resulting from NuStar GP Holdings awards to non-employee directors | $ | — | $ | 6 | $ | 192 | $ | 9 |
GP Services Agreement
On April 24, 2008, the boards of directors of each of NuStar GP, LLC and NuStar GP Holdings approved (i) the termination of the administration agreement, dated July 16, 2006, between NuStar GP Holdings and NuStar GP, LLC (the Administration Agreement) and (ii) the adoption of a services agreement between NuStar GP, LLC and NuStar Energy (the GP Services Agreement). All employees providing services to both NuStar GP Holdings and NuStar Energy are employed by NuStar GP, LLC.
Under the Administration Agreement, we paid annual charges of $500,000, subject to certain adjustments, to NuStar GP, LLC in return for NuStar GP, LLC’s provision of all executive management, accounting, legal, cash management, corporate finance and other administrative services to us. We also reimbursed NuStar GP, LLC for all direct public company costs and any other direct costs, such as outside legal and accounting fees, that NuStar GP, LLC incurred while providing services to us.
In connection with the termination of the Administration Agreement, NuStar Energy and NuStar GP, LLC entered into the GP Services Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2008. The GP Services Agreement provides that NuStar GP, LLC will furnish all administrative services necessary for the conduct of the business of NuStar Energy and NuStar Energy will reimburse NuStar GP, LLC for all costs, other than the expenses allocated to us (the Holdco Administrative Services Expense).
For the fiscal year 2008, the Holdco Administrative Services Expense will be equal to $750,000, plus 1.0% of NuStar GP, LLC’s domestic bonus and unit compensation expense for the 2008 fiscal year and subject to certain other adjustments. The GP Services Agreement will terminate on December 31, 2012, with automatic two-year renewals unless terminated by either party upon six months’ prior written notice. The aggregate amounts we incurred related to the Administration Agreement and the GP Services Agreement were $0.3 million and $0.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $0.4 million and $0.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
24
Table of Contents
Contingencies
As previously discussed, our only cash-generating assets are our indirect ownership interests in NuStar Energy. NuStar Energy is subject to certain loss contingencies, the outcome of which could have an effect on NuStar Energy’s cash flows. Specifically, NuStar Energy may be required to make substantial payments to the U.S. Department of Justice for certain remediation costs.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Our critical accounting policies are disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
25
Table of Contents
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
• | Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. |
Our management has evaluated, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this report, and has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2008.
• | Changes in internal control over financial reporting. |
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings |
The information below describes new proceedings or material developments in proceedings that we previously reported in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Department of Justice Matter. The U.S. Department of Justice (the DOJ) advised NuStar Pipeline Operating Partnership L.P. (NuPOP) that Region VII of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the EPA) has requested that the DOJ initiate a lawsuit against NuPOP for (a) failing to prepare adequate Facility Response Plans, as required by Section 311(j)(5) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §1321(j), for certain of its pipeline terminals located in Region VII by August 30, 1994, and (b) maintaining Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure Plans (SPCC Plans) at the terminal that deviate from the SPCC regulations, 40 C.F.R. §112.3. A Facility Response Plan is a plan for responding to a worst case discharge, and to a substantial threat of such a discharge, of oil or hazardous substances. The SPCC rule requires specific facilities to prepare, amend and implement plans to prevent, prepare and respond to oil discharges to navigable waters and adjoining shorelines. NuStar Energy L.P. (NuStar Energy) is currently in settlement negotiations with the DOJ to resolve these matters.
EPA Investigation.On November 14, 2006, agents of the EPA presented a search warrant issued by a U.S. District Court at a terminal owned by Shore Terminals, LLC (Shore), a wholly owned subsidiary of NuPOP. Since then, NuStar Energy and Shore have been served with additional subpoenas. The search warrant and subpoenas all seek information regarding allegations of potential illegal conduct by Shore, certain of its affiliates and/or its employees concerning compliance with certain environmental and safety laws and regulations. NuStar Energy has cooperated fully with the U.S. Attorney and the EPA in producing documents in response to the subpoenas. Although the U.S. Attorney has indicated that they intend to seek criminal penalties and fines as a result of alleged violations of environmental laws at the terminal, NuStar Energy is currently in negotiations with the U.S. Attorney and the EPA to resolve this matter.
There can be no assurances that the conclusion of the U.S. Attorney’s and the EPA’s investigation will not result in a determination that Shore violated applicable laws. If Shore is found to have violated such laws, NuStar Energy could be subject to fines, civil penalties and criminal penalties. A final determination that Shore violated applicable laws could, among other things, result in debarment from future federal government contracts. If any of the consequences described above ultimately occur, it is reasonably possible that the effects could be material to NuStar Energy’s results of operations in the period NuStar Energy would be required to record a liability, and could be material to NuStar Energy’s cash flows in the periods NuStar Energy would be required to pay such liability.
26
Table of Contents
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
Our annual meeting of unitholders was held April 24, 2008. Matters voted on at the meeting and the results thereof were as follows:
(a) | a proposal to elect two Class II directors to serve until the 2011 annual meeting was approved as follows: |
Directors | Affirmative | Withheld | Non-Votes | |||
Curtis V. Anastasio | 36,843,094 | 249,189 | n/a | |||
William B. Burnett | 36,930,480 | 161,803 | n/a |
(b) | a proposal to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008 was approved as follows: |
Affirmative | Negative | Withheld | Non-Votes | |||
36,928,919 | 102,789 | 60,575 | n/a |
Directors whose terms of office continued after the annual meeting were: William E. Greehey, Stan L. McLelland and James F. Clingman, Jr.
Item 6. | Exhibits |
*Exhibit 31.01 | Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications (under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002). | |
*Exhibit 32.01 | Section 1350 Certifications (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002). |
* | Filed herewith. |
+ | Identifies management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements required to be filed as an exhibit hereto. |
27
Table of Contents
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
NUSTAR GP HOLDINGS, LLC | ||
(Registrant) | ||
By: | /s/ Curtis V. Anastasio | |
Curtis V. Anastasio | ||
President and Chief Executive Officer | ||
August 8, 2008 | ||
By: | /s/ Steven A. Blank | |
Steven A. Blank | ||
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | ||
August 8, 2008 | ||
By: | /s/ Thomas R. Shoaf | |
Thomas R. Shoaf | ||
Vice President and Controller | ||
August 8, 2008 |
28