Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The Partnership does not engage in the sale of goods or services. The Partnership's only assets are its equity in its commodity futures trading account consisting of cash, investment in Partnerships, net unrealized appreciation on open futures and forward contracts, commodity options, if applicable, and interest receivable. Because of the low margin deposits normally required in commodity futures trading, relatively small price movements may result in substantial losses to the Partnership. While substantial losses could lead to a decrease in liquidity, no such losses occurred in the second quarter of 2006.
The Partnership's Capital consists of the capital contributions of the partners as increased or decreased by realized and/or unrealized gains or losses on commodity futures trading, expenses, interest income, redemptions of Redeemable Units and distributions of profits, if any.
For the six months ended June 30, 2006, Partnership Capital increased 40.6% from $172,442,322 to $242,415,548. This increase was attributable to net income from operations of $24,198,462 coupled with additional sales of 32,842.6123 Redeemable Units of Limited Partnership totaling $56,150,000, which was partially offset by the redemption of 5,831.2768 Redeemable Units resulting in an outflow of $10,375,236. Future redemptions can impact the amount of funds available for investment in the Partnership in subsequent periods.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
All commodity interests (including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments) held by the Partnership are used for trading purposes. The commodity interests are recorded on trade date and open contracts are recorded in the statement of financial condition at fair value on the last business day of the period, which represents market value for those commodity interests for which market quotations are readily available or other measures of fair value deemed appropriate by management of the General Partner for those commodity interests and foreign currencies for which market quotations are not readily available, including dealer quotes for swaps and certain option contracts. Investments in commodity interests denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates prevailing on the last business day of the period. Realized gains (losses) and changes in unrealized values on commodity interests and foreign currencies are recognized in the period in which the contract is closed or the changes occur and are included in net gains (losses) on trading of commodity interests. The investment in AAA Master, Willowbridge Master and Winton Master are recorded at fair value, based upon the Partnership's proportionate interest held.
Foreign currency contracts are those contracts where the Partnership agrees to receive or deliver a fixed quantity of foreign currency for an agreed-upon price on an agreed future date. Foreign currency contracts are valued daily, and the Partnership's net equity therein, representing unrealized gain or loss on the contracts as measured by the difference between the forward foreign exchange rates at the dates of entry into the contracts and the forward rates at the reporting dates, is included in the statement of financial condition. Realized gains (losses) and changes in unrealized values on foreign currency contracts are recognized in the period in which the contract is closed or the changes occur and are included in the statements of income and expenses and partners' capital.
During the Partnership's second quarter of 2006, the net asset value per Redeemable Unit increased 5.8% from $1,709.35 to $1,808.67 as compared to an increase of 1.4% in the second quarter of 2005. The Partnership experienced a net trading gain before brokerage commissions and related fees in the second
Table of Contentsquarter of 2006 of $15,716,731. Gains were primarily attributable to the Partnership's trading of trading of currencies, energy, U.S. and non-U.S. interest rates, and metals and were partially offset by losses in grains, livestock, softs and indices. The Partnership experienced a net trading gain before brokerage commissions and related fees in the second quarter of 2005 of $6,042,828. Gains were primarily attributable to the Partnership's trading of commodity futures in currencies, non-U.S. interest rates, livestock and indices, and were partially offset by losses in energy, grains, U.S. interest rates, metals and softs.
The second quarter 2006 was challenging for the Advisors as both financial and commodity markets entered a highly volatile period. Gains were primarily earned in interest rate, energy, currency and metals trading and offset losses in agricultural and stock index trading.
The Partnership's trend-following Advisors were profitable in the energy sector as gains made in natural gas trading offset losses in crude oil and petroleum products. Trends in the metal sector extended from the first quarter and remained strong for the first half of the second quarter. The substantial gains accumulated from record gold, silver and base metal price trends were more than sufficient to cover losses generated during the metals correction in May.
Trading in U.S. and global fixed income markets was profitable as central banks continued to raise global rates to combat inflation pressure and the Advisors were able to take advantage of these trends.
Currency trading was profitable despite the lack of direction in the currency sector which was the result of speculation relating to U.S. interest rate policy coupled with global inflation concerns. Losses in the equity sector were attributable to a global economic slowdown as most of the major equity indices experienced a material correction in May after reaching multi-year highs. Sharp price reversals in grains and softs translated into losses as alternating meteorological conditions between drought and rainfall contributed to irregular price developments. Overall, the Partnership had a successful second quarter.
During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the net asset value per Redeemable Unit increased 12.2% from $1,611.33 to $1,808.67 as compared to an increase of 10.3% during the six months ended June 30, 2005. The Partnership experienced a net trading gain before brokerage commissions and related fees in the six months ended June 30, 2006 of $32,974,304. Gains were primarily attributable to the Partnership's trading of commodity futures in energy, U.S. and non-U.S. interest rates, metals, and indicies and were partially offset by losses in currencies, grains, livestock, and softs. The Partnership experienced a net trading gain before brokerage commissions and related fees in the six months ended June 30, 2005 of $21,281,887. Gains were primarily attributable to the Partnership's trading of commodity futures in energy, U.S. and non U.S. interest rates and indices and were partially offset by losses in currencies, grains, livestock, metals and softs.
Commodity futures markets are highly volatile. The potential for broad and rapid price fluctuations increases the risks involved in commodity trading, but also increases the possibility of profit. The profitability of the Partnership depends on the existence of major price trends and the ability of the Advisors to correctly identify those price trends. Price trends are influenced by, among other things, changing supply and demand relationships, weather, governmental, agricultural, commercial and trade programs and policies, national and international political and economic events and changes in interest rates. To the extent that market trends exist and the Advisors are able to identify them, the Partnership expects to increase capital through operations. AAA is aware of price trends but does not trade upon trends. AAA often takes profits in positions with specific trends even though that trend may still be intact or perhaps even stronger. AAA occasionally establishes positions that are counter-trend.
Interest income is earned on 100% of the Partnership's average daily equity maintained in cash in its account during each month at a 30-day U.S. Treasury bill rate determined weekly by CGM based on the average non-competitive yield on 3-month U.S. Treasury bills maturing in 30 days from the date on which such weekly rate is determined. CGM may continue to maintain the Partnership's assets in cash and/or place all of the Partnership's assets in 90-day Treasury bills and pay the Partnership 100% of the interest earned on Treasury bills purchased. Interest income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 decreased by $130,273 and $237,351 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2005. The decrease is due to the Partnership's use of cash to fund additional investments in other partnerships. The interest
15
Table of Contentsearned at the Investment in Partnerships level is included in the Partnership's share of overall net income (loss) of the other partnerships in 2006 as compared to 2005.
Brokerage commissions are based on the number of trades executed by the Advisors. Brokerage commissions and fees for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 increased by $116,354 and $861,788, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2005. The increase in commissions and fees is primarily due to an increase in the number of trades during the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2005.
Management fees are calculated as a percentage of the Partnership's net asset value as of the end of each month and are affected by trading performance, additions and redemptions. Management fees for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 increased by $480,962 and $822,283, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2005. The increase of management fees is due to an increase in net assets during the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2005.
Administrative fees are paid to the General Partner for administering the business and affairs of the Partnership. These fees are calculated as a percentage of the Partnership's net asset value as of the end of each month and are affected by trading performance and redemptions. Administrative fees for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 increased by $133,390 and $228,881, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2005. The increase in administrative fees is due to an increase in net assets during the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2005.
Incentive fees paid by the Partnership are based on the new trading profits generated by each Advisor at the end of the quarter, as defined in the management agreements between the Partnership, the General Partner and each Advisor. Trading performance for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 resulted in incentive fees of $633,539 and $3,736,128, respectively. Trading performance for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 resulted in incentive fees of $2,304,369 and $5,329,717, respectively.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
The Partnership is a speculative commodity pool. The market sensitive instruments held by it are acquired for speculative trading purposes, and all or substantially all of the Partnership's assets are subject to the risk of trading loss. Unlike an operating company, the risk of market sensitive instruments is integral, not incidental, to the Partnership's main line of business.
Market movements result in frequent changes in the fair value of the Partnership's open positions and, consequently, in its earnings and cash flow. The Partnership's market risk is influenced by a wide variety of factors, including the level and volatility of interest rates, exchange rates, equity price levels, the value of financial instruments and contracts, the diversification effects of the Partnership's open positions and the liquidity of the markets in which it trades.
The Partnership rapidly acquires and liquidates both long and short positions in a range of different markets. Consequently, it is not possible to predict how a particular future market scenario will affect performance, and the Partnership's past performance is not necessarily indicative of its future results.
Value at Risk is a measure of the maximum amount which the Partnership could reasonably be expected to lose in a given market sector. However, the inherent uncertainty of the Partnership's speculative trading and the recurrence in the markets traded by the Partnership of market movements far exceeding expectations could result in actual trading or non-trading losses far beyond the indicated Value at Risk or the Partnership's experience to date (i.e., ‘‘risk of ruin’’). In light of the foregoing, as well as the risks and uncertainties intrinsic to all future projections, the inclusion of the quantification in this section should not be considered to constitute any assurance or representation that the Partnership's losses in any market sector will be limited to Value at Risk or by the Partnership's attempts to manage its market risk.
Exchange maintenance margin requirements have been used by the Partnership as the measure of its Value at Risk. Maintenance margin requirements are set by exchanges to equal or exceed the maximum losses reasonably expected to be incurred in the fair value of any given contract in 95%-99% of any one-day interval. Maintenance margin has been used rather than the more generally available initial margin, because initial margin includes a credit risk component, which is not relevant to Value at Risk.
16
Table of ContentsThe following tables indicate the trading Value at Risk associated with the Partnership's investments and investments in other Partnerships by market category as of June 30, 2006 and the highest, lowest and average value during the three months ended June 30, 2006. All open position trading risk exposures of the Partnership have been included in calculating the figures set forth below. As of June 30, 2006, the Partnership's total capitalization was $242,415,548. There has been no material change in the trading Value at Risk information previously disclosed in the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
June 30, 2006
(Unaudited)

 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  | |  |  | |  |  | Three Months Ended June 30, 2006 |
Market Sector |  |  | Value at Risk |  |  | % of Total Capitalization |  |  | High Value at Risk |  |  | Low Value at Risk |  |  | Average Value at Risk* |
Currencies: – Exchange Traded Contracts |  |  |  | $ | 208,404 | |  |  |  |  | 0.08 | |  |  |  | $ | 828,090 | |  |  |  | $ | 125,820 | |  |  |  | $ | 466,739 | |
Energy |  |  |  |  | 498,150 | |  |  |  |  | 0.20 | |  |  |  |  | 838,350 | |  |  |  |  | 145,800 | |  |  |  |  | 460,080 | |
Grains |  |  |  |  | 38,880 | |  |  |  |  | 0.02 | |  |  |  |  | 140,940 | |  |  |  |  | 12,636 | |  |  |  |  | 52,650 | |
Interest Rates U.S. |  |  |  |  | 153,090 | |  |  |  |  | 0.06 | |  |  |  |  | 320,760 | |  |  |  |  | — | |  |  |  |  | 165,240 | |
Interest Rates Non-U.S. |  |  |  |  | 232,906 | |  |  |  |  | 0.10 | |  |  |  |  | 579,954 | |  |  |  |  | 26,244 | |  |  |  |  | 324,525 | |
Softs |  |  |  |  | 66,780 | |  |  |  |  | 0.03 | |  |  |  |  | 131,040 | |  |  |  |  | 15,120 | |  |  |  |  | 43,260 | |
Totals |  |  |  | $ | 1,198,210 | |  |  |  |  | 0.49 | |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |
 |
 |  |
| * Average month-end Values at Risk |
As of June 30, 2006, AAA Master's total capitalization was $1,114,862,975. The partnership owns 8.3% of AAA Master.
June 30, 2006
(Unaudited)

 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  | |  |  | |  |  | Three Months Ended June 30, 2006 |
Market Sector |  |  | Value at Risk |  |  | % of Total Capitalization |  |  | High Value at Risk |  |  | Low Value at Risk |  |  | Average Value at Risk* |
Energy |  |  |  | $ | 14,366,191 | |  |  |  |  | 1.29 | |  |  |  | $ | 149,543,621 | |  |  |  | $ | 14,366,191 | |  |  |  | $ | 53,342,470 | |
Energy Swaps |  |  |  |  | 4,130,046 | |  |  |  |  | 0.37 | |  |  |  | $ | 4,130,046 | |  |  |  | $ | 4,130,046 | |  |  |  | $ | 4,130,046 | |
Total |  |  |  | $ | 18,496,237 | |  |  |  |  | 1.66 | |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |
 |
 |  |
| * Average monthly Values at Risk |
17
Table of ContentsAs of June 30, 2006, Willowbridge Master's total capitalization was $183,497,148. The Partnership owns 28.3% of Willowbridge Master.
June 30, 2006
(Unaudited)

 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  | |  |  | |  |  | Three Months Ended June 30, 2006 |
Market Sector |  |  | Value at Risk |  |  | % of Total Capitalization |  |  | High Value at Risk |  |  | Low Value at Risk |  |  | Average Value at Risk |
Currencies: |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |
– Exchange Traded Contracts |  |  |  | $ | 5,860,621 | |  |  |  |  | 3.19 | |  |  |  | $ | 16,059,735 | |  |  |  | $ | 2,867,738 | |  |  |  | $ | 11,228,040 | |
Energy |  |  |  |  | 9,175,275 | |  |  |  |  | 5.00 | |  |  |  |  | 12,034,575 | |  |  |  |  | 1,417,500 | |  |  |  |  | 10,563,300 | |
Grains |  |  |  |  | 476,550 | |  |  |  |  | 0.27 | |  |  |  |  | 1,771,875 | |  |  |  |  | 190,620 | |  |  |  |  | 959,147 | |
Interest Rates U.S. |  |  |  |  | 3,002,265 | |  |  |  |  | 1.64 | |  |  |  |  | 6,237,000 | |  |  |  |  | 2,287,440 | |  |  |  |  | 4,245,255 | |
Interest Rates Non - -U.S. |  |  |  |  | 4,337,027 | |  |  |  |  | 2.36 | |  |  |  |  | 11,303,300 | |  |  |  |  | 4,243,100 | |  |  |  |  | 6,724,014 | |
Softs |  |  |  |  | 519,540 | |  |  |  |  | 0.28 | |  |  |  |  | 784,000 | |  |  |  |  | 220,500 | |  |  |  |  | 377,347 | |
Total |  |  |  | $ | 23,371,278 | |  |  |  |  | 12.74 | |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |
 |
 |  |
| * Average month-end Values at Risk |
As of June 30, 2006, Winton Master's total capitalization was $248,613,904. The Partnership owns 36.3% of Winton Master.
June 30, 2006
(Unaudited)

 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  | |  |  | |  |  | Three Months Ended June 30, 2006 |
Market Sector |  |  | Value at Risk |  |  | % of Total Capitalization |  |  | High Value at Risk |  |  | Low Value at Risk |  |  | Average Value at Risk |
Currencies |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |
– Exchange Traded Contracts |  |  |  | $ | 3,495,089 | |  |  |  |  | 1.41 | |  |  |  | $ | 5,174,536 | |  |  |  | $ | 2,485,925 | |  |  |  | $ | 3,372,319 | |
Energy |  |  |  |  | 1,276,070 | |  |  |  |  | 0.51 | |  |  |  |  | 5,638,643 | |  |  |  |  | 1,033,628 | |  |  |  |  | 2,791,126 | |
Grains |  |  |  |  | 297,136 | |  |  |  |  | 0.12 | |  |  |  |  | 307,235 | |  |  |  |  | 146,668 | |  |  |  |  | 297,790 | |
Interest Rates U.S. |  |  |  |  | 2,813,198 | |  |  |  |  | 1.13 | |  |  |  |  | 9,363,026 | |  |  |  |  | 347,582 | |  |  |  |  | 4,047,702 | |
Interest Rates Non-U.S. |  |  |  |  | 6,744,526 | |  |  |  |  | 2.71 | |  |  |  |  | 9,078,252 | |  |  |  |  | 3,821,899 | |  |  |  |  | 6,468,534 | |
Livestock |  |  |  |  | 93,683 | |  |  |  |  | 0.04 | |  |  |  |  | 405,810 | |  |  |  |  | 90,562 | |  |  |  |  | 261,223 | |
Metals |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |
– Exchange Traded Contract |  |  |  |  | 515,795 | |  |  |  |  | 0.21 | |  |  |  |  | 702,675 | |  |  |  |  | 24,300 | |  |  |  |  | 701,159 | |
– OTC Contracts |  |  |  |  | 1,675,370 | |  |  |  |  | 0.68 | |  |  |  |  | 1,791,040 | |  |  |  |  | 568,612 | |  |  |  |  | 1,109,716 | |
Softs |  |  |  |  | 753,606 | |  |  |  |  | 0.30 | |  |  |  |  | 907,159 | |  |  |  |  | 475,179 | |  |  |  |  | 807,259 | |
Indices |  |  |  |  | 3,358,610 | |  |  |  |  | 1.35 | |  |  |  |  | 12,015,494 | |  |  |  |  | 2,673,947 | |  |  |  |  | 6,831,089 | |
Lumber |  |  |  |  | 1,650 | |  |  |  |  | 0.00 | |  |  |  |  | 3,300 | |  |  |  |  | 1,650 | |  |  |  |  | 1,650 | |
Total |  |  |  | $ | 21,024,733 | |  |  |  |  | 8.46 | |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |
 |
 |  |
| * Average month-end Values at Risk |
18
Table of ContentsItem 4. Controls and Procedures
The General Partner of the Partnership, with the participation of the General Partner's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) with respect to the Partnership as of the end of the period covered by the report, and, based on this evaluation, has concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There was no change in the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting during the period the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting.
19
Table of ContentsPART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The following information supplements and amends our discussion set forth under Part I, Item 3 ‘‘Legal Proceedings’’ in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as updated by our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006.
Enron Corp.
On May 24, 2006, the District Court gave final approval to Citigroup's settlement of the securities class action (NEWBY, ET AL. V. ENRON CORP., ET AL.).
Research
On May 12, 2006, the District Court preliminarily approved the class action settlements in IN RE SALOMON ANALYST LEVEL 3 LITIGATION, IN RE SALOMON ANALYST XO LITIGATION, and IN RE SALOMON ANALYST WILLIAMS LITIGATION.
On May 18, 2006, the District Court gave final approval to the settlement in NORMAN v. SALOMON SMITH BARNEY.
On June 20, 2006, the District Court certified the plaintiff class in IN RE SALOMON ANALYST METROMEDIA LITIGATION.
On June 26, 2006, the United States Supreme Court granted plaintiffs' petition for a writ of certiorari, vacated the opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in DISHER v. CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC., and then remanded the case to the Seventh Circuit for further proceedings in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Kircher v. Putnam Funds Trust.
Adelphia Communications Corporation
Without admitting any liability, CGM and numerous other financial institution defendants have agreed to settle IN RE ADELPHIA COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION SECURITIES AND DERIVATIVE LITIGATION for a total of $250 million, subject to final court approval. On June 15, 2006, the court granted its preliminary approval of the settlement and set November 10, 2006 for a final hearing. CGM's share of the settlement is covered by existing reserves.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There are no material changes from the risk factors set forth under Part I, Item 1A. ‘‘Risk Factors’’ in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.
20
Table of ContentsItem 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
For the three months ended June 30, 2006 there were additional sales of 13,724.2563 Redeemable Units of Limited Partnership totaling $24,641,000. The Redeemable Units were issued in reliance upon applicable exemptions from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 506 of Regulation D promulgated there under.
Proceeds from the sale of additional Redeemable Units are used in the trading of commodity interests including futures contracts, options, forwards and swap contracts.
The following chart sets forth the purchases of Redeemable Units by the Partnership.

 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Period |  |  | (a) Total Number of Units Purchased* |  |  | (b) Average Price Paid per Unit** |  |  | (c) Total Number of Units Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs |  |  | (d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Units that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs |
April 1, 2006 − April 30, 2006 |  |  |  |  | 980.6047 | |  |  |  | $ | 1,904.09 | |  |  |  |  | N/A | |  |  |  |  | N/A | |
May 1, 2006 − May 31, 2006 |  |  |  |  | 925.1049 | |  |  |  | $ | 1,824.07 | |  |  |  |  | N/A | |  |  |  |  | N/A | |
June 1, 2006 − June 30, 2006 |  |  |  |  | 1,798.0698 | |  |  |  | $ | 1,808.67 | |  |  |  |  | N/A | |  |  |  |  | N/A | |
|  |  |  |  | 3,703.7794 | |  |  |  | $ | 1,845.61 | |  |  |  |  | N/A | |  |  |  |  | N/A | |
 |
 |  |
| * Generally, Limited Partners are permitted to redeem their Redeemable Units as of the end of each month on 10 days' notice to the General Partner. Under certain circumstances, the General Partner can compel redemption but to date the General Partner has not exercised this right. Purchases of Redeemable Units by the Partnership reflected in the chart above were made in the ordinary course of the Partnership's business in connection with effecting redemptions for Limited Partners. |
 |  |
| ** Redemptions of Redeemable Units are effected as of the last day of each month at the Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit as of that day. |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities – None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders – None
Item 5. Other Information
As of April 3, 2006, AAA Capital Management, Inc. ceased acting as a commodity trading advisor for the Fund. The portions of the Fund's assets formerly allocated to AAA Capital Management, Inc. were reallocated to AAA Capital Management Advisors, Ltd. effective April 3, 2006. A copy of the management agreement between AAA Capital Management Advisors, Ltd. and the Fund is attached to this Form 10-Q as an exhibit.
Item 6. Exhibits
 |  |
| The exhibits required to be filed by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are incorporated herein by reference to the exhibit index of the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005. |
Exhibit – 31.1 – Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification (Certification of President and Director).
Exhibit – 31.2 – Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification (Certification of Chief Financial Officer and Director).
Exhibit – 32.1 – Section 1350 Certification (Certification of President and Director).
Exhibit – 32.2 – Section 1350 Certification (Certification of Chief Financial Officer and Director).
Exhibit – 33 – Management Agreement among the Partnership, the General Partner and AAA Capital Management Advisors, Ltd. (filed herein).
21
Table of ContentsSIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
SALOMON SMITH BARNEY ORION FUTURES FUND L.P.

 |  |  |  |
By: |  |  | Citigroup Managed Futures LLC |
|  |  | (General Partner) |
By: |  |  | /s/ David J. Vogel |
|  |  | David J. Vogel President and Director |
Date: |  |  | August 14, 2006 |
By: |  |  | /s/ Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr. |
|  |  | Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr. Chief Financial Officer and Director |
Date: |  |  | August 14, 2006 |
 |
22