Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2006
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 0-32453
Inergy Holdings, L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 43-1792470 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
Two Brush Creek Blvd., Suite 200 Kansas City, Missouri | 64112 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip code) |
(816) 842-8181
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer x Non-accelerated filer ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The following units were outstanding at February 1, 2007:
Common Units | 20,002,000 |
Table of Contents
INERGY HOLDINGS, L.P.
2
Table of Contents
Item 1. | Financial Statements of Inergy Holdings, L.P. |
INERGY HOLDINGS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in millions, except unit information)
December 31, 2006 | September 30, 2006 | |||||
(unaudited) | ||||||
Assets | ||||||
Current assets: | ||||||
Cash | $ | 14.3 | $ | 12.1 | ||
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $3.1 and $2.9 at December 31, 2006 and September 30, 2006, respectively | 162.0 | 99.5 | ||||
Inventories | 88.5 | 108.1 | ||||
Assets from price risk management activities | 54.7 | 46.2 | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 22.3 | 30.0 | ||||
Total current assets | 341.8 | 295.9 | ||||
Property, plant and equipment | 878.5 | 847.9 | ||||
Less: accumulated depreciation | 137.5 | 124.4 | ||||
Property, plant and equipment, net | 741.0 | 723.5 | ||||
Intangible assets: | ||||||
Customer accounts | 226.5 | 226.0 | ||||
Covenants not to compete | 61.8 | 54.2 | ||||
Trademarks | 32.8 | 32.8 | ||||
Deferred financing and other costs | 23.5 | 23.6 | ||||
344.6 | 336.6 | |||||
Less: accumulated amortization | 59.7 | 52.9 | ||||
Intangible assets, net | 284.9 | 283.7 | ||||
Goodwill | 366.4 | 339.7 | ||||
Other assets | 4.2 | 4.0 | ||||
Total assets | $ | 1,738.3 | $ | 1,646.8 | ||
3
Table of Contents
INERGY HOLDINGS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (continued)
(in millions, except unit information)
December 31, 2006 | September 30, 2006 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
Liabilities and partners’ capital | ||||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 135.6 | $ | 81.5 | ||||
Accrued expenses | 54.5 | 63.0 | ||||||
Customer deposits | 78.2 | 98.0 | ||||||
Liabilities from price risk management activities | 43.3 | 49.0 | ||||||
Current portion of long-term debt | 16.8 | 16.9 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 328.4 | 308.4 | ||||||
Long-term debt, less current portion | 744.7 | 673.1 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities | 10.9 | 11.8 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 15.7 | 15.8 | ||||||
Interest of non-controlling partners in Inergy, L.P. | 657.6 | 656.4 | ||||||
Partners’ capital | ||||||||
Common unitholders (20,002,000 and 20,000,000 units issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2006 and September 30, 2006, respectively) | (18.3 | ) | (18.0 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | (0.7 | ) | (0.7 | ) | ||||
Total partners’ capital (deficiency) | (19.0 | ) | (18.7 | ) | ||||
Total liabilities and partners’ capital | $ | 1,738.3 | $ | 1,646.8 | ||||
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
INERGY HOLDINGS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in millions, except unit and per unit data)
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended December 31, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Revenue: | ||||||||
Propane | $ | 327.4 | $ | 367.3 | ||||
Other | 80.3 | 83.0 | ||||||
407.7 | 450.3 | |||||||
Cost of product sold (excluding depreciation and amortization as shown below) | ||||||||
Propane | 230.7 | 285.2 | ||||||
Other | 47.9 | 52.6 | ||||||
278.6 | 337.8 | |||||||
Gross profit | 129.1 | 112.5 | ||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||
Operating and administrative | 65.7 | 69.0 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 20.5 | 19.8 | ||||||
Loss on disposal of assets | 0.7 | 0.4 | ||||||
Operating income | 42.2 | 23.3 | ||||||
Other income (expense): | ||||||||
Interest expense, net | (14.3 | ) | (13.6 | ) | ||||
Finance charge income | 0.6 | 0.6 | ||||||
Other income | 0.2 | 0.1 | ||||||
Income before income taxes and interest of non-controlling partners in Inergy, L.P.’s net income | 28.7 | 10.4 | ||||||
Provision for income taxes | (0.2 | ) | (0.5 | ) | ||||
Interest of non-controlling partners in Inergy, L.P.’s net income | (21.4 | ) | (6.2 | ) | ||||
Net income | $ | 7.1 | $ | 3.7 | ||||
Net income applicable to limited partners’ units | $ | 7.1 | $ | 3.7 | ||||
Net income per limited partner: | ||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.19 | ||||
Diluted | $ | 0.35 | $ | 0.19 | ||||
Weighted average limited partners’ units outstanding(in thousands): | ||||||||
Basic | 20,001 | 20,000 | ||||||
Diluted | 20,184 | 20,224 | ||||||
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
5
Table of Contents
INERGY HOLDINGS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
(in millions)
(unaudited)
Partners’ Common Interest (Deficit) | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | Total Partners’ Capital (Deficiency) | ||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2006 | $ | (18.0 | ) | $ | (0.7 | ) | $ | (18.7 | ) | |||
Net proceeds from common unit options exercised | 0.1 | — | 0.1 | |||||||||
Distributions | (7.5 | ) | — | (7.5 | ) | |||||||
Comprehensive income: | ||||||||||||
Net income | 7.1 | — | 7.1 | |||||||||
Comprehensive income | 7.1 | |||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2006 | $ | (18.3 | ) | $ | (0.7 | ) | $ | (19.0 | ) | |||
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
INERGY HOLDINGS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in millions)
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended December 31, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Operating activities | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 7.1 | $ | 3.7 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation | 14.4 | 15.4 | ||||||
Amortization | 6.1 | 4.4 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs | 0.6 | 0.6 | ||||||
Unit based compensation charges | 0.1 | 0.1 | ||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts | — | 0.9 | ||||||
Loss on disposal of assets | 0.7 | 0.4 | ||||||
Interest of non-controlling partners in Inergy, L.P.’s net income | 21.4 | 6.2 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | (0.2 | ) | (0.3 | ) | ||||
Net assets (liabilities) from price risk management activities | (13.9 | ) | (22.2 | ) | ||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions: | ||||||||
Accounts receivable | (63.1 | ) | (106.2 | ) | ||||
Inventories | 20.1 | 40.1 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 7.8 | 11.1 | ||||||
Other assets (liabilities) | (0.2 | ) | (0.3 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable | 53.3 | 53.7 | ||||||
Accrued expenses | (8.5 | ) | (0.5 | ) | ||||
Customer deposits | (19.8 | ) | (18.6 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | 25.9 | (11.5 | ) | |||||
Investing activities | ||||||||
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired | $ | (45.0 | ) | $ | (156.0 | ) | ||
Purchases of property, plant and equipment | (22.1 | ) | (5.0 | ) | ||||
Deferred acquisition costs incurred | (0.2 | ) | (0.1 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of assets | 2.9 | 0.9 | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (64.4 | ) | (160.2 | ) |
7
Table of Contents
INERGY HOLDINGS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (continued)
(in millions)
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended December 31, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Financing activities | ||||||||
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt | $ | 164.8 | $ | 335.5 | ||||
Principal payments on long-term debt | (96.2 | ) | (146.1 | ) | ||||
Net proceeds from the issuance of Inergy, L.P. common units | — | 24.9 | ||||||
Distributions to non-controlling partners in Inergy, L.P. | (23.0 | ) | (19.0 | ) | ||||
Distributions | (7.5 | ) | (5.7 | ) | ||||
Deferred financing costs incurred | — | (0.9 | ) | |||||
Net proceeds from unit options exercised of Inergy, L.P. | 2.5 | — | ||||||
Net proceeds from unit options exercised | 0.1 | — | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 40.7 | 188.7 | ||||||
Net increase in cash | 2.2 | 17.0 | ||||||
Cash at beginning of period | 12.1 | 9.6 | ||||||
Cash at end of period | $ | 14.3 | $ | 26.6 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information | ||||||||
Cash paid during the period for interest | $ | 16.9 | $ | 16.9 | ||||
Cash paid during the period for taxes | 0.2 | 0.1 | ||||||
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities | ||||||||
Additions to covenants not to compete through the issuance of noncompete obligations | $ | 2.7 | $ | 4.3 | ||||
Additions to property, plant and equipment through accounts payable and accrued expenses | 3.4 | 0.3 | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in the fair value of long-term debt and related interest rate swap liability | 0.4 | (1.5 | ) | |||||
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired: | ||||||||
Current assets | $ | 0.1 | $ | 30.4 | ||||
Property, plant and equipment | 14.0 | 116.3 | ||||||
Intangible assets | 7.8 | 4.8 | ||||||
Goodwill | 26.8 | 38.2 | ||||||
Other assets | — | 0.7 | ||||||
Current liabilities | (1.0 | ) | (30.1 | ) | ||||
Non-compete liabilities | (2.7 | ) | (4.3 | ) | ||||
$ | 45.0 | $ | 156.0 | |||||
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
8
Table of Contents
INERGY HOLDINGS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
Note 1 – Organization and Basis of Presentation
Organization
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Inergy Holdings, L.P. (“Holdings” or the “Company”), its wholly owned subsidiaries, Inergy Partners, LLC (“Partners”), Inergy GP, LLC (“GP”), IPCH Acquisition Corp. (“IPCHA”) and its controlled subsidiary Inergy, L.P. (“Inergy” or the “Partnership”). IPCHA is a subsidiary created as a result of transactions with Inergy. All significant intercompany transactions, including distribution income, and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of Inergy and its subsidiaries, including Inergy Propane, LLC (“Inergy Propane”), Inergy Midstream, LLC (collectively, the “Operating Companies”) and Inergy Finance Corp. Partners (the “Non-Managing General Partner”) owns the Non-Managing General Partner interest in Inergy. GP (the “Managing General Partner”) has sole responsibility for conducting Inergy’s business and managing Inergy’s operations. The Company is a holding company whose principal business, through its subsidiaries, is its management of and ownership in Inergy. The Company has no operations of its own.
As of December 31, 2006, Holdings owns an aggregate 9.3% interest in Inergy, inclusive of ownership of the Non-Managing General Partner and Managing General Partner. This ownership is comprised of an approximate 1.0% general partnership interest and an approximate 8.3% limited partnership interest. The Company also owns all of the “incentive distribution rights” provided for in the Inergy partnership agreement, which entitles Holdings to receive increasing percentages, up to 48%, of any cash distributed by Inergy in excess of $0.33 per unit in any quarter.
Nature of Operations
Inergy conducts all of the business activities of the consolidated group and is engaged primarily in the sale, distribution, storage, marketing, trading, processing and fractionation of propane, natural gas and other natural gas liquids. The retail propane market is seasonal because propane is used primarily for heating in residential and commercial buildings, as well as for agricultural purposes. Inergy’s operations are primarily concentrated in the Midwest, Northeast, and South regions of the United States.
Basis of Presentation
The financial information contained herein as of December 31, 2006 and for the three-month periods ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 is unaudited. The Company believes this information has been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. The Company also believes this information includes all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods then ended. The retail distribution business is largely seasonal due to propane’s primary use as a heating source in residential and commercial buildings. Accordingly, the results of operations for the three-month period ended December 31, 2006 are not indicative of the results of operations that may be expected for the entire fiscal year.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of Inergy Holdings, L.P. and subsidiaries and the notes thereto included in Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006.
Reclassifications
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on net income.
On May 19, 2006, the Company restated its consolidated financial statements for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2005 to defer recorded non-cash gains on the limited partnership units of Inergy it owns based on the application of Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 51, “Accounting for Sales of Stock by a Subsidiary” (“SAB 51”). These restated financial statements were filed with the SEC on May 19, 2006 on Form 10-Q/A. The changes have no prior, current or future impact on the cash available for distributions to unitholders.
9
Table of Contents
INERGY HOLDINGS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
Note 2 – Accounting Policies
Financial Instruments and Price Risk Management
Inergy utilizes certain derivative financial instruments to (i) manage its exposure to commodity price risk, specifically, the related change in the fair value of inventories, as well as the variability of cash flows related to forecasted transactions; (ii) ensure adequate physical supply of commodity will be available; and (iii) manage its exposure to interest rate risk. Inergy records all derivative instruments on the balance sheet as either assets or liabilities measured at fair value under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 133”), as amended. Changes in the fair value of these derivative financial instruments are recorded either through current earnings or as other comprehensive income, depending on the type of transaction.
Inergy is party to certain commodity derivative financial instruments that are designated as hedges of selected inventory positions, and qualify as fair value hedges, as defined in SFAS 133. Inergy’s overall objective for entering into fair value hedges is to manage its exposure to fluctuations in commodity prices and changes in the fair market value of its inventories. These derivatives are recorded at fair value on the balance sheets as price risk management assets or liabilities and the related change in fair value is recorded to earnings in the current period as cost of product sold. Any ineffective portion of the fair value hedges is recognized as cost of product sold in the current period. During the three months ended December 31, 2006, Inergy recognized an immaterial net loss related to the ineffective portion of its fair value hedging instruments and a net gain of $1.2 million related to the portion of fair value hedging instruments that Inergy excluded from its assessment of hedge effectiveness.
Inergy also enters into derivative financial instruments that qualify as cash flow hedges, which hedge the exposure of variability in expected future cash flows predominantly attributable to forecasted purchases to supply fixed price sale contracts. These derivatives are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value as price risk management assets or liabilities. The effective portion of the gain or loss on these cash flow hedges is recorded in other comprehensive income in partner’s capital and reclassified into earnings in the same period in which the hedge transaction affects earnings. Any ineffective portion of the gain or loss is recognized as cost of product sold in the current period. Inergy’s accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) was $(16.3) million and $0.3 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
The cash flow impact of derivative financial instruments is reflected as cash flows from operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows.
Revenue Recognition
Sales of propane and other liquids are recognized at the later of the time the product is shipped or delivered to the customer. Gas processing and fractionation fees are recognized upon delivery of the product. Revenue from the sale of propane appliances and equipment is recognized at the later of the time of sale or installation. Revenue from repairs and maintenance is recognized upon completion of the service. Revenue from storage contracts is recognized during the period in which storage services are provided.
Expense Classification
Cost of product sold consists of tangible products sold including all propane and other natural gas liquids sold and all propane related appliances sold. Operating and administrative expenses consist of all expenses incurred by the Company other than those described above in cost of product sold and depreciation and amortization. Certain of Inergy’s operating and administrative expenses and depreciation and amortization are incurred in the distribution of its product sales but are not included in cost of product sold. These amounts were $21.6 million and $20.5 million for the three months ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
10
Table of Contents
INERGY HOLDINGS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the year. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Inventories
Inventories for retail operations, which mainly consist of propane gas and other liquids, are stated at the lower of cost or market and are computed using the average-cost method. Wholesale propane inventories are designated under a fair value hedge program and are consequently marked to market. All wholesale propane inventories being hedged and carried at market value at December 31, 2006 and September 30, 2006 amount to $42.3 million and $67.8 million, respectively. Inventories for midstream operations are stated at the lower of cost or market determined using the first-in-first-out method.
Shipping and Handling Costs
Shipping and handling costs are recorded as part of cost of product sold at the time product is shipped or delivered to the customer except as discussed in “Expense Classification.”
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed by the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, as follows:
Years | ||
Buildings and improvements | 25-40 | |
Office furniture and equipment | 3–10 | |
Vehicles | 5–10 | |
Tanks and plant equipment | 5–30 |
Identifiable Intangible Assets
The Company has recorded certain identifiable intangible assets, including customer accounts, covenants not to compete, trademarks, deferred financing costs and deferred acquisition costs. Customer accounts, covenants not to compete, and trademarks have arisen from the various acquisitions by Inergy. Deferred financing costs represent financing costs incurred in obtaining financing and are amortized over the term of the related debt. Additionally, an acquired intangible asset is separately recognized if the benefit of the intangible asset is obtained through contractual or other legal rights, or if the intangible asset can be sold, transferred, licensed, rented or exchanged, regardless of the acquirer’s intent to do so.
Certain intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated economic lives, as follows:
Years | ||
Customer accounts | 15 | |
Covenants not to compete | 2–10 | |
Deferred financing costs | 1–10 |
Trademarks have been assigned an indefinite economic life and are not being amortized, but are subject to an annual impairment evaluation.
11
Table of Contents
INERGY HOLDINGS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
Income Per Unit
The Company calculates basic net income per limited partner unit by dividing net income applicable to partners’ common interest by the weighted average number of units outstanding. Diluted net income per limited partner unit is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of units outstanding and the effect of dilutive units granted under the long-term incentive plan.
The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted net income per limited partner unit(in millions, except unit and per unit data):
Three Months Ended December 31, | ||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||
Numerator: | ||||||
Net income | $ | 7.1 | $ | 3.7 | ||
Limited partners’ interest in net income – basic and diluted | 7.1 | 3.7 | ||||
Denominator(in thousands): | ||||||
Weighted average limited partners’ units outstanding-basic | 20,001 | 20,000 | ||||
Effect of dilutive units | 183 | 224 | ||||
Weighted average limited partners’ units outstanding – dilutive | 20,184 | 20,224 | ||||
Net income per limited partner unit: | ||||||
Basic | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.19 | ||
Diluted | $ | 0.35 | $ | 0.19 | ||
Accounting for Unit-Based Compensation
The Company and Inergy each have a unit-based employee compensation plan, which is accounted for under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123(R)”). SFAS 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25”), and amends SFAS No. 95, “Statement of Cash Flows.”SFAS 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values.
The Company adopted SFAS 123(R) on October 1, 2005 using the modified prospective method. Under the modified prospective method, compensation cost is recognized beginning with the effective date (a) for all share-based payments granted after the effective date and (b) for all awards granted to employees prior to effective date of SFAS 123(R) that remain unvested as of the effective date. Under this method, SFAS 123(R) applies to new awards and to awards modified, repurchased, or cancelled after the adoption date of October 1, 2005. The compensation cost for the portion of awards for which the requisite service has not been rendered that are outstanding as of October 1, 2005 will be recognized as the requisite service is rendered. The compensation cost for that portion of awards is based on the fair value of those awards as of the grant-date and was calculated for pro forma disclosures under SFAS 123. The compensation cost for those earlier awards is attributed to periods beginning on or after October 1, 2005 using the attribution method that was used under SFAS 123.
The amount of compensation expense recorded by Inergy under the provisions of SFAS 123(R) during the three months ended December 31, 2006 was approximately $0.1 million, and includes unit-based compensation expense for options on Inergy Holdings, L.P. units issued to Inergy employees.
12
Table of Contents
INERGY HOLDINGS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
Segment Information
SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information” (“SFAS 131”) establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments, as well as related disclosures about products and services, geographic areas, and major customers. Further, SFAS 131 defines operating segments as components of an enterprise for which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and assessing performance. In determining reportable segments under the provisions of SFAS 131, Inergy examined the way it organizes its business internally for making operating decisions and assessing business performance. See Note 8 for disclosures related to Inergy’s propane and midstream segments.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”) was issued in September 2006 to define fair value, establish a framework for measuring fair value according to generally accepted accounting principles, and expand disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is required to be adopted by Inergy for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008. The Company will be evaluating the potential financial statement impact of SFAS 157 to its consolidated financial statements.
SFAS No. 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments” (“SFAS 155”) amends SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” and SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities.” SFAS 155 permits fair value remeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation. It also establishes a requirement to evaluate securitized financial assets to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation. For Inergy, SFAS 155 is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued on or after October 1, 2006. The adoption of SFAS 155 has not had a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Note 3 – Certain Balance Sheet Information
Inventories consist of the following at December 31, 2006 and September 30, 2006, respectively (in millions):
December 31, 2006 | September 30, 2006 | |||||
Propane gas and other liquids | $ | 76.1 | $ | 96.1 | ||
Appliances, parts and supplies | 12.4 | 12.0 | ||||
$ | 88.5 | $ | 108.1 | |||
Property, plant and equipment consists of the following at December 31, 2006 and September 30, 2006, respectively (in millions):
December 31, 2006 | September 30, 2006 | |||||
Tanks and plant equipment | $ | 588.8 | $ | 578.4 | ||
Land and buildings | 138.9 | 135.5 | ||||
Vehicles | 91.0 | 89.3 | ||||
Construction in process | 39.7 | 24.7 | ||||
Office furniture and equipment | 20.1 | 20.0 | ||||
878.5 | 847.9 | |||||
Less: accumulated depreciation | 137.5 | 124.4 | ||||
Property, plant and equipment, net | $ | 741.0 | $ | 723.5 | ||
At December 31, 2006 and September 30, 2006, the Company had capitalized interest of $1.0 million and $0.4 million, respectively, related to certain Midstream asset expansion projects. These amounts are reflected in construction in process.
13
Table of Contents
INERGY HOLDINGS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
Note 4 – Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt consisted of the following(in millions):
December 31, | September 30, | |||||
2006 | 2006 | |||||
Inergy credit agreement | $ | 91.9 | $ | 22.7 | ||
Inergy senior unsecured notes | 621.8 | 621.4 | ||||
Inergy obligations under noncompetition agreements and notes to former owners of businesses acquired | 17.5 | 15.6 | ||||
Holdings bank facility | 5.3 | 5.3 | ||||
Holdings term loan | 25.0 | 25.0 | ||||
761.5 | 690.0 | |||||
Less current portion | 16.8 | 16.9 | ||||
$ | 744.7 | $ | 673.1 | |||
The Company’s bank facility (the “Bank Facility”) consists of a $15 million working capital revolver for Holdings and a $5 million working capital revolver for IPCHA. The maturity date of the Bank Facility is July 22, 2008 and is collateralized by certain of our interests in Inergy. In addition, the Bank Facility is guaranteed by Partners. The interest rates of these revolvers are based on prime rate and LIBOR plus the applicable spreads, which were 7.10% at December 31, 2006 for all outstanding debt under the Bank Facility. The Bank Facility contains several covenants which, among other things, require the maintenance of various financial performance ratios, restrict the payment of distributions to unitholders, and require financial reports to be submitted periodically to the financial institutions.
Inergy’s Credit Agreement
Inergy’s credit agreement (“Credit Agreement”) consists of a $75 million revolving working capital facility (the “Working Capital Facility”) and a $350 million revolving acquisition facility (the “Acquisition Facility”). On October 1, 2006, Inergy amended the Credit Agreement with existing lenders primarily to increase the effective amount of working capital borrowings available through the utilization of the Acquisition Facility from $75 million to $125 million. Other terms, conditions, and covenants remained materially unchanged. The Credit Agreement is guaranteed by each of Inergy’s domestic subsidiaries.
At December 31, 2006, the balance outstanding under the Credit Agreement was $91.9 million, including $70.0 million under the Acquisition Facility and $21.9 million under the Working Capital Facility. At September 30, 2006, the balance outstanding under the Credit Agreement was $22.7 million, all under the Working Capital Facility. The interest rates of these revolvers are based on prime rate and LIBOR plus the applicable spreads, which were between 7.10% and 8.50% at December 31, 2006, and between 7.08% and 8.50% at September 30, 2006, for all outstanding debt under the Credit Agreement. Unused borrowings under the Credit Agreement amounted to $292.4 million and $369.4 million at December 31, 2006 and September 30, 2006, respectively. Outstanding standby letters of credit under the Credit Agreement amounted to $40.7 million and $32.9 million at December 31, 2006 and September 30, 2006, respectively.
Inergy is party to five interest rate swap agreements scheduled to mature in December 2014, each designed to hedge $25 million in underlying fixed rate senior unsecured notes in order to manage interest rate risk exposure. These swap agreements, which expire on the same date as the maturity date of the related senior unsecured notes due 2014 and contain call provisions consistent with the underlying senior unsecured notes, require the counterparty to pay the Company an amount based on the stated fixed interest rate due every six months. In exchange, Inergy is required to make semi-annual floating interest rate payments on the same dates to the counterparty based on an annual interest rate equal to the 6-month LIBOR interest rate plus spreads between 0.92% and 2.20% applied to the same notional amount of $125 million. The swap agreements have been recognized as fair value hedges. Amounts to be received or paid under the agreements are accrued and recognized over the life of the agreements as an adjustment to interest expense. At December 31, 2006, Inergy had recorded an approximate $3.2 million reduction in the fair market value of the related senior unsecured notes with a corresponding change in the fair value of its interest rate swaps, which are recorded in other long-term liabilities.
14
Table of Contents
INERGY HOLDINGS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
At December 31, 2006, the Company was in compliance with all of its debt covenants.
Note 5 – Business Acquisitions
During October 2006, Inergy closed the following three asset acquisitions: Bath Storage Facility, Columbus Butane Company, Inc., and Hometown Propane, Inc. In November 2006, Inergy acquired the propane assets of Mideastern Oil Company, Inc. Additionally, in December 2006, Inergy acquired the assets of the Jacksonville, Florida location of Sun Belt Energy of Florida, LLC and Stevens Gas Service, Inc. These six acquisitions increased Inergy’s market share and the aggregate purchase price, net of cash acquired was $44.3 million. The purchase price allocation for these acquisitions has been prepared on a preliminary basis pending final asset valuation and asset rationalization, and changes are expected when additional information becomes available.
As a result of the above acquisitions, Inergy allocated $27.0 million to goodwill. In addition, Inergy allocated $7.9 million to intangible assets, consisting primarily of customer accounts and non-compete agreements.
The operating results for these acquisitions are included in the consolidated results of operations from the dates of acquisition through December 31, 2006.
Note 6 – Partners’ Capital
Quarterly Distributions of Available Cash
On November 14, 2006, a quarterly distribution of $0.375 per limited partner unit was paid to unitholders of record on November 7, 2006 with respect to the fourth fiscal quarter of 2006, which totaled $7.5 million. On February 14, 2007, a quarterly distribution of $0.40 per limited partner unit will be paid to unitholders of record on February 7, 2007, for a total distribution of $8.0 million with respect to the first fiscal quarter of 2007.
On November 14, 2005, a quarterly distribution of $0.27 per limited partner unit was paid to unitholders of record on November 7, 2005 with respect to the fourth fiscal quarter of 2005, which totaled $5.4 million. The Company distributed $0.29 per limited partner unit on February 14, 2006 to unitholders of record on February 7, 2006 for a total distribution of $5.8 million with respect to the first fiscal quarter of 2006.
The Company’s capital is comprised primarily of its equity in Inergy and the Company’s ability to make distributions is contingent upon the distributions it receives from Inergy. While Inergy distributes all available cash, its capital is not all available for distribution.
Inergy Holdings, L.P. Long-Term Incentive Plan
Inergy GP, LLC sponsors the Inergy Holdings Long-Term Incentive Plan (“Holdings LTIP”) for the employees, directors, and consultants of the general partner and employees, directors, and consultants of the Company’s affiliates which perform services for the Company. The Holdings LTIP consists of four components: restricted units, phantom units, unit appreciation rights and unit options. The Company has not granted restricted units, phantom units, or unit appreciation rights under the Holdings LTIP as of December 31, 2006. The Holdings LTIP limits the aggregate number of units that may be delivered pursuant to awards to 2,000,000 units. As of December 31, 2006, the Company had 685,000 unit options outstanding pursuant to the long-term incentive plan. The Holdings LTIP is administered by the compensation committee of the board of directors of the general partner.
Unit Options
Unit options issued under the Holdings LTIP have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the units on the date of the grant. In general, unit options granted under the Holdings LTIP will become exercisable over a period determined by the compensation committee. In addition, the unit options will become exercisable upon a Change in Control. If a grantee’s employment, consulting or membership on the board of directors terminates for any reason, the grantee’s unvested unit options will be automatically forfeited unless, and to the extent, the option agreement or the compensation committee provide otherwise.
15
Table of Contents
INERGY HOLDINGS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
A summary of the Company’s unit option activity for the three months ended December 31, 2006 is as follows:
Range of Exercise Prices | Weighted- Average Exercise Price | Number of Units | |||||||
Outstanding at September 30, 2006 | $ | 22.50-$35.35 | $ | 24.38 | 674,500 | ||||
Granted | $ | 34.43-$35.52 | $ | 34.87 | 12,500 | ||||
Exercised | $ | 22.50 | $ | 22.50 | (2,000 | ) | |||
Forfeited | — | — | — | ||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2006 | $ | 22.50-$35.52 | $ | 24.57 | 685,000 | ||||
Exercisable at December 31, 2006 | — | ||||||||
The weighted-average remaining contract life for options outstanding at December 31, 2006 was approximately 8.6 years. The fair value of each option grant was estimated as of the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the assumptions outlined in the table below. Expected volatility was based on a combination of historical and implied volatilities of the Company’s units over a period at least as long as the options’ expected term. The expected life represents the period of time that the options granted are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free rate is based on the applicable U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant of the unit options.
Weighted-average fair value of options granted | $ | 3.19 | ||
Expected volatility | 0.2359 | |||
Distribution yield | 3.7 | % | ||
Expected life of option in years | 5 | |||
Risk-free interest rate | 4.7 | % |
The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding at December 31, 2006 was $10.7 million. The aggregate intrinsic value of unit options exercised during the three months ended December 31, 2006 was not significant. Aggregate intrinsic value represents the positive difference between the Company’s closing unit price on the last trading day of the fiscal period, which was $40.17 on December 29, 2006, and the exercise price multiplied by the number of options outstanding.
Inergy, L.P. Long-Term Incentive Plan
Inergy GP, LLC sponsors the Inergy Long-Term Incentive Plan (“Inergy LTIP”) for its employees, consultants, and directors and the employees of its affiliates that perform services for Inergy. The Inergy LTIP currently permits the grant of awards covering an aggregate of 1,735,100 common units, which can be granted in the form of unit options and/or restricted units; however, not more than 565,600 restricted units may be granted under the plan.
Restricted Units
During the 2006 fiscal period, the compensation committee granted 58,756 restricted units. During the current fiscal period, the compensation committee granted an additional 20,500 restricted units. Of the 79,256 restricted units, 20,000 vest over a three year period beginning three years from the grant date, 3,756 vest over a three year period beginning one year from the grant date, while the remaining 55,500 restricted units cliff vest five years from grant date. Some of these units are subject to the achievement of certain specified performance objectives and failure to meet the performance objectives will result in forfeiture and cancellation of the restricted units. Inergy recognizes expense on these units each quarter using an estimate of the units expected to vest multiplied by the closing price of Inergy’s common units on the date of grant.
Of the total 79,256 restricted units outstanding, the weighted average remaining contract life is 9.6 years.
16
Table of Contents
INERGY HOLDINGS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
The compensation expense recorded by Inergy related to these restricted unit awards was less than $0.1 million for the three months ended December 31, 2006.
Unit Options
Unit options issued under the Inergy LTIP have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the units on the date of the grant. In general, unit options will expire after 10 years and are subject to the vesting provisions as outlined in the unit option agreement. In addition, most unit option grants made under the plan provide that the unit options will become exercisable upon a change of control of the managing general partner or Inergy.
A summary of Inergy’s unit option activity for the three months ended December 31, 2006 is as follows:
Range of Exercise Prices | Weighted- Average Exercise Price | Number of Units | |||||||
Outstanding at September 30, 2006 | $ | 8.19 - $31.32 | $ | 16.37 | 711,964 | ||||
Granted | — | — | — | ||||||
Exercised | $ | 10.00 - $27.14 | $ | 11.11 | (232,600 | ) | |||
Canceled | — | — | — | ||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2006 | $ | 8.19 - $31.32 | $ | 18.92 | 479,364 | ||||
Exercisable at December 31, 2006 | $ | 8.19 - $13.75 | $ | 11.07 | 31,864 | ||||
The weighted-average remaining contract lives for outstanding options and for exercisable options at December 31, 2006 were approximately six years and four years, respectively. The fair value of each option grant was estimated as of the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the assumptions outlined in the table below. Expected volatility was based on a combination of historical and implied volatilities of Inergy’s units over a period at least as long as the options’ expected term. The expected life represents the period of time that the options granted are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free rate is based on the applicable U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant of the unit options.
Weighted-average fair value of options granted | $ | 1.28 | ||
Expected volatility | 0.234 | |||
Distribution yield | 7.4 | % | ||
Expected life of option in years | 5 | |||
Risk-free interest rate | 3.5 | % |
The aggregate intrinsic values of outstanding options and of exercisable options at December 31, 2006 were $5.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of unit options exercised during the three months ended December 31, 2006 was $4.0 million. There were no options exercised during the three months ended December 31, 2005. Aggregate intrinsic value represents the positive difference between Inergy’s closing unit price on the last trading day of the fiscal period, which was $29.81 on December 29, 2006, and the exercise price multiplied by the number of options outstanding.
As of December 31, 2006, there was $4.1 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested unit-based compensation awards granted to employees under the restricted unit and unit option plans, including approximately $1.9 million related to Holdings unvested unit-based compensation awards. That cost is expected to be recognized over a five-year period.
Note 7 – Commitments and Contingencies
Inergy periodically enters into agreements with suppliers to purchase fixed quantities of propane, distillates, natural gas and liquids at fixed prices. At December 31, 2006, the total of these firm purchase commitments was approximately $272.7 million. Inergy also enters into agreements with suppliers to purchase quantities of propane, distillates, natural gas and liquids at variable prices at future dates at the then prevailing market prices.
17
Table of Contents
INERGY HOLDINGS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
At December 31, 2006, Inergy was contingently liable for letters of credit outstanding totaling $40.7 million, which guarantee various transactions.
The Company is periodically involved in litigation proceedings. The results of litigation proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty; however, management believes that the Company does not have material potential liability in connection with these proceedings that would have a significant financial impact on its consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Inergy utilizes third-party insurance subject to varying retention levels of self-insurance, which management considers prudent. Such self-insurance relates to losses and liabilities primarily associated with medical claims, workers’ compensation claims and general, product, vehicle, and environmental liability. Losses are accrued based upon management’s estimates of the aggregate liability for claims incurred using certain assumptions followed in the insurance industry and based on past experience. At December 31, 2006 and September 30, 2006, Inergy’s self-insurance reserves were $13.8 million and $11.2 million, respectively.
Note 8 – Segments
The Company’s financial statements reflect two operating and reportable segments: propane operations and midstream operations. The Company’s propane operations include propane sales to end users, the sale of propane-related appliances and service work for propane-related equipment, the sale of distillate products and wholesale distribution of propane and marketing and price risk management services to other users, retailers and resellers of propane. The Company’s midstream operations include storage of natural gas for third parties, fractionation of natural gas liquids, processing of natural gas, and the distribution of natural gas liquids. Results of operations for acquisitions that occurred during the three months ended December 31, 2006, excluding the Bath Storage Facility, are included in the propane segment. The results of operations for the Bath Storage Facility are included in the midstream segment.
The identifiable assets associated with each reportable segment include accounts receivable and inventories. Goodwill is also presented for each segment. The net asset/liability from price risk management, as reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, is related to the propane segment.
Revenues, gross profit, identifiable assets and goodwill for each of the Company’s reportable segments are presented below(in millions):
Three Months Ended December 31, 2006 | ||||||||||||
Propane Operations | Midstream Operations | Intersegment Eliminations | Total | |||||||||
Retail propane revenues | $ | 219.2 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 219.2 | ||||
Wholesale propane revenues | 102.3 | 5.9 | — | 108.2 | ||||||||
Storage, fractionation and other midstream revenues | — | 35.4 | — | 35.4 | ||||||||
Transportation revenues | 2.4 | — | — | 2.4 | ||||||||
Propane-related appliance sales revenues | 7.6 | — | — | 7.6 | ||||||||
Retail service revenues | 5.3 | — | — | 5.3 | ||||||||
Rental service and other revenues | 5.9 | — | — | 5.9 | ||||||||
Distillate revenues | 23.7 | — | — | 23.7 | ||||||||
Gross profit | 116.1 | 13.0 | — | 129.1 | ||||||||
Identifiable assets | 236.5 | 14.0 | — | 250.5 | ||||||||
Goodwill | 268.7 | 97.7 | — | 366.4 |
18
Table of Contents
INERGY HOLDINGS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended December 31, 2005 | ||||||||||||
Propane Operations | Midstream Operations | Intersegment Eliminations | Total | |||||||||
Retail propane revenues | $ | 237.4 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 237.4 | ||||
Wholesale propane revenues | 124.7 | 5.2 | — | 129.9 | ||||||||
Storage, fractionation and other midstream revenues | — | 33.6 | — | 33.6 | ||||||||
Transportation revenues | 2.7 | — | — | 2.7 | ||||||||
Propane-related appliance sales revenues | 8.2 | — | — | 8.2 | ||||||||
Retail service revenues | 5.4 | — | — | 5.4 | ||||||||
Rental service and other revenues | 5.0 | — | — | 5.0 | ||||||||
Distillate revenues | 28.1 | — | — | 28.1 | ||||||||
Gross profit | 101.8 | 10.7 | — | 112.5 | ||||||||
Identifiable assets | 293.5 | 14.3 | — | 307.8 | ||||||||
Goodwill | 271.6 | 23.0 | — | 294.6 |
Note 9 – Subsequent Events
Inergy has completed the acquisition of the 24-mile lateral pipeline connecting its Stagecoach natural gas storage facility to Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company’s (“TGP”) Line 300 (“Stagecoach Lateral”). The Stagecoach Lateral extends from Inergy’s central compression facility in Tioga County, New York, to TGP’s Station 319 in Bradford County, Pennsylvania. The facility was placed in service by TGP in January 2002, and it has a certificated capacity of 500 mmcf/day. The purchase price of the Stagecoach Lateral was approximately $35 million plus a customary working capital adjustment.
19
Table of Contents
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and “Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Inergy Holdings, L.P. for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006.
The statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not historical facts, including most importantly, those statements preceded by, or that include the words “may”, “believes”, “expects”, “anticipates” or the negation thereof, or similar expressions, constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements that: (i) we believe our wholesale supply, marketing and distribution business complements our retail distribution business, (ii) we expect recovery of goodwill through future cash flows associated with acquisitions, and (iii) we believe that anticipated cash from operations and borrowings under our credit facility will be sufficient to meet our liquidity needs for the foreseeable future. Such forward-looking statements involves risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to, the following: weather in our area of operations; market price of propane; availability of financing; changes in, or failure to comply with, government regulations; the costs, uncertainties and other effects of legal and administrative proceedings and other risks and uncertainties detailed in our Securities and Exchange Commission filings. For those statements, we claim the protections of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Reform Act. We will not undertake and specifically decline any obligation to publicly release the result of any revisions to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect events or circumstances after anticipated or unanticipated events.
Overview
Our cash-generating assets consist of our partnership interests, including incentive distribution rights, in Inergy, L.P. (“Inergy”), a publicly traded Delaware limited partnership. Our primary objective is to increase distributable cash flow to our unitholders through our ownership of partnership interests in Inergy. Our incentive distribution rights entitle us to receive an increasing percentage of total cash distributions made by Inergy as it reaches certain target distribution levels and have resulted in significantly increasing cash distributions to us.
Our aggregate partnership interests in Inergy consist of the following:
• | a 100% ownership interest in each of the managing general partner of Inergy, which manages Inergy’s business and affairs, and the non-managing general partner of Inergy, which owns an approximate 1.0% general partner interest in Inergy; |
• | 3,787,340 Inergy common units, representing an aggregate limited partner interest in Inergy of approximately 8.3%; |
• | 769,941 Inergy special units, which are not entitled to a current distribution and will convert into Inergy common units representing limited partnership interests in Inergy at a specified conversion rate upon the commercial operation of the Stagecoach expansion project as described below. Upon commercial operation of the Stagecoach expansion project and the resulting conversion of the 769,941 special units into Inergy common units, the Company will recognize non-cash gains on the limited partnership units of Inergy it owns based on the application of Securities and Exchange Commission’s Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 51, “Accounting for Sales of Stock by a Subsidiary;” and |
• | all of the incentive distribution rights in Inergy which entitle us to receive increasing percentages, up to a maximum of 48.0%, of any cash distributed by Inergy as certain target distribution levels are reached in excess of $0.33 per Inergy unit in any quarter. |
20
Table of Contents
Inergy is a growing retail and wholesale propane, supply, marketing and distribution business. Inergy also owns and operates a growing midstream operation, including a high performance, multicycle natural gas storage facility (“Stagecoach”) and a natural gas liquids (“NGL”) business in California, which includes natural gas processing, NGL fractionation, NGL rail and truck terminals, bulk storage, trucking and marketing operations. Inergy has grown primarily through acquisitions of retail propane operations. Since the inception of Inergy’s predecessor in November 1996 through December 31, 2006, Inergy has acquired 65 companies, 62 propane companies and 3 midstream businesses for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $1.4 billion, including working capital, assumed liabilities and acquisition costs. Inergy further intends to pursue its growth objectives through, among other things, future acquisitions, maintaining a high percentage of retail sales to residential customers, operating in attractive markets and focusing its operations under established, and locally recognized trade names.
During October 2006, Inergy closed the following three asset acquisitions: Bath Storage Facility, Columbus Butane Company, Inc., and Hometown Propane, Inc. In November 2006, Inergy acquired the propane assets of Mideastern Oil Company, Inc. Additionally, in December 2006, Inergy acquired the assets of the Jacksonville, FL location of Sun Belt Energy of Florida, LLC and Stevens Gas Service, Inc. These six acquisitions increased Inergy’s market share and the aggregate purchase price, net of cash acquired was $44.3 million. The purchase price allocation for these acquisitions has been prepared on a preliminary basis pending final asset valuation and asset rationalization, and changes are expected when additional information becomes available.
Since we control the managing general partner of Inergy, we reflect our ownership interest in Inergy on a consolidated basis, which means that our financial results are combined with Inergy’s financial results and the results of our other subsidiaries. The limited partner interests in Inergy not owned by affiliates of the managing general partner are reflected as an expense in our results of operations. We have no separate operating activities apart from those conducted by Inergy, and our cash flows consist of distributions from Inergy on the partnership interests we own. Our consolidated results of operations principally reflect the results of operations of Inergy, and also include our provision for income taxes and interest of non-controlling partners in Inergy’s net income. Accordingly, the discussion of our financial position and results of operations in this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” reflects the operating activities and results of operations of Inergy.
The retail propane distribution business is largely seasonal due to propane’s primary use as a heating source in residential and commercial buildings. As a result, cash flows from operations are generally highest from November through April when customers pay for propane purchased during the six-month peak heating season of October through March.
Because a substantial portion of Inergy’s propane is used in the weather-sensitive residential markets, the temperatures realized in its areas of operations, particularly during the six-month peak heating season, have a significant effect on its financial performance. In any given area, warmer-than-normal temperatures will tend to result in reduced propane use, while sustained colder-than-normal temperatures will tend to result in greater propane use. Therefore, Inergy uses information on normal temperatures in understanding how historical results of operations are affected by temperatures that are colder or warmer than normal and in preparing forecasts of future operations, which are based on the assumption that normal weather will prevail in each of its operating regions. “Heating degree days” are a general indicator of how weather impacts propane usage and are calculated for any given period by adding the difference between 65 degrees and the average temperature of each day in the period (if less than 65 degrees).
The retail propane business is a “margin-based” business where the level of profitability is largely dependent on the difference between sales prices and product costs. The unit cost of propane is subject to volatile changes as a result of product supply or other market conditions. Propane unit cost changes can occur rapidly over a short period of time and can impact margins as sales prices may not change as rapidly. There is no assurance that Inergy will be able to fully pass on product cost increases, particularly when product costs increase rapidly. Inergy has generally been successful in passing on higher propane costs to its customers and has historically maintained or increased its gross margin per gallon in periods of rising costs.
Inergy believes its wholesale supply, marketing and distribution business complements its retail distribution business. Through its wholesale operations, Inergy distributes propane and also offers price risk management services to propane retailers, resellers and other related businesses as well as energy marketers and dealers, through a variety of financial and other instruments, including:
21
Table of Contents
• | forward contracts involving the physical delivery of propane; |
• | swap agreements which require payments to (or receipt of payments from) counterparties based on the differential between a fixed and variable price for propane; and |
• | options, futures contracts on the New York Mercantile Exchange and other contractual arrangements. |
Inergy engages in derivative transactions to reduce the effect of price volatility on its product costs and to help ensure the availability of propane during periods of short supply. Inergy attempts to balance its contractual portfolio by purchasing volumes only when Inergy has a matching purchase commitment from its wholesale customers. However, Inergy may experience net unbalanced positions from time to time.
Results of Operations
The results of operations discussed below principally reflect the activities of Inergy. Because our financial statements represent combined consolidated results of Inergy, our financial statements are substantially similar to Inergy’s. The primary differences in our financial statements include the following amounts in the income statement:
• | Provision for Income Taxes. Our provision for income taxes is primarily related to cash flows received by IPCH Acquisition Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. |
• | Interest of Non-Controlling Partners in Inergy’s Net (Income) Loss. We adjust our net income by excluding the cash flows distributed on Inergy limited partner units that are not directly or indirectly owned by us. At December 31, 2006, we owned an approximate 8.3% limited partner interest in Inergy together with a 1.0% non-managing general partner interest; and the non-affiliated unitholders owned a 90.7% limited partner interest in Inergy. |
Three Months Ended December 31, 2006 Compared to Three Months Ended December 31, 2005
The following table summarizes the consolidated income statement components for the three months ending December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively(in millions):
Three Months Ended December 31, | Change | ||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | In Dollars | Percentage | ||||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 407.7 | $ | 450.3 | $ | (42.6 | ) | (9.5 | )% | ||||||
Cost of product sold | 278.6 | 337.8 | (59.2 | ) | (17.5 | ) | |||||||||
Gross profit | 129.1 | 112.5 | 16.6 | 14.8 | |||||||||||
Operating and administrative expenses | 65.7 | 69.0 | (3.3 | ) | (4.8 | ) | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 20.5 | 19.8 | 0.7 | 3.5 | |||||||||||
Loss on disposal of assets | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 75.0 | |||||||||||
Operating income | 42.2 | 23.3 | 18.9 | 81.1 | |||||||||||
Interest expense, net | (14.3 | ) | (13.6 | ) | (0.7 | ) | (5.1 | ) | |||||||
Finance charge income | 0.6 | 0.6 | — | — | |||||||||||
Other income | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 100.0 | |||||||||||
Income before income taxes and interest of non-controlling partners in Inergy’s net income | 28.7 | 10.4 | 18.3 | 176.0 | |||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | (0.2 | ) | (0.5 | ) | 0.3 | 60.0 | |||||||||
Interest of non-controlling partners in Inergy’s net income | (21.4 | ) | (6.2 | ) | (15.2 | ) | (245.2 | ) | |||||||
Net income | $ | 7.1 | $ | 3.7 | $ | 3.4 | 91.9 | % | |||||||
22
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes revenues, including associated volume of gallons sold, for the three months ending December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively(in millions):
Revenues | Gallons | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended December 31, | Change | Three Months Ended December 31, | Change | ||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | In Dollars | Percentage | 2006 | 2005 | In Units | Percentage | ||||||||||||||||
Retail propane | $ | 219.2 | $ | 237.4 | $ | (18.2 | ) | (7.7 | )% | 111.2 | 125.1 | (13.9 | ) | (11.1 | )% | ||||||||
Wholesale propane | 108.2 | 129.9 | (21.7 | ) | (16.7 | ) | 108.8 | 127.5 | (18.7 | ) | (14.7 | ) | |||||||||||
Other retail | 44.9 | 49.4 | (4.5 | ) | (9.1 | ) | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Storage, fractionation and midstream | 35.4 | 33.6 | 1.8 | 5.4 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 407.7 | $ | 450.3 | $ | (42.6 | ) | (9.5 | )% | 220.0 | 252.6 | (32.6 | ) | (12.9 | )% | ||||||||
Volume.During the three months ended December 31, 2006, we sold 111.2 million retail gallons of propane, a decrease of 13.9 million gallons or 11.1% from the 125.1 million retail gallons sold during the same three-month period in 2005. The decrease was principally due to the warmer weather experienced in the 2006 period and, to a lesser extent, the sale of certain branches during fiscal 2006 and expected volume losses from recent acquisitions. Weather was approximately 11% warmer in our comparable areas of operation in the three months ended December 31, 2006 as compared to the same period in 2005 and approximately 7% warmer than normal. Offsetting the decrease in retail gallons sold was acquisition-related volume, which resulted in an increase of 7.5 million gallons in the quarter ended December 31, 2006.
Wholesale gallons delivered during the three months ended December 31, 2006 were 108.8 million gallons compared to 127.5 million gallons during the same three-month period in 2005. The decrease of 18.7 million gallons was primarily attributable to warmer weather during the 2006 period versus the comparable prior year period in our wholesale areas of operations.
The total natural gas liquid gallons sold by our West Coast operations decreased 1.2 million gallons, or 7.5%, to 14.9 million gallons during the three months ended December 31, 2006 from 16.1 million gallons during the same three-month period in 2005. This decrease was attributable to additional short-term sales contracts executed during the 2005 period with customers that had higher refinery demand, which triggered an increase in their product purchases at that time. Stagecoach has 13.25 bcf of working gas storage capacity which was 100% contracted during each of the three months ended December 31, 2006 and 2005.
Revenues. Revenues for the three months ended December 31, 2006 were $407.7 million, a decrease of $42.6 million, or 9.5%, from $450.3 million during the same three-month period in 2005.
Revenues from retail propane sales were $219.2 million for the three months ended December 31, 2006, a decrease of $18.2 million, or 7.7%, from $237.4 million from the same three-month period in 2005. This decrease was primarily the result of a $40.6 million decline due to lower retail volume sales at our existing locations (as discussed above) partially offset by an increase of $14.9 million due to acquisition-related sales together with an increase of approximately $7.5 million due to higher selling prices of propane.
Revenues from wholesale propane sales were $108.2 million for the three months ended December 31, 2006, a decrease of $21.7 million or 16.7%, from $129.9 million from the same three-month period in 2005. This decrease was primarily the result of a $19.1 million decline as a result of the lesser sales volume (as discussed above), together with a decrease of approximately $2.6 million due to lower wholesale selling prices.
Revenues from other retail sales, primarily service, appliance, transportation, and distillates, were $44.9 million for the three months ended December 31, 2006, a decrease of $4.5 million or 9.1% from $49.4 million during the same three-month period in 2005. This decrease was primarily the result of a $5.9 million decline due to lower volume sales of distillates caused primarily by warmer weather and customer conservation, partially offset by an increase of $1.4 million resulting from recent acquisitions.
23
Table of Contents
Revenues from storage, fractionation and other midstream activities were $35.4 million for the three months ended December 31, 2006, an increase of $1.8 million or 5.4% from $33.6 million during the same three-month period in 2005. This increase resulted from higher storage revenues, including approximately $0.9 million due to the acquisition of the Bath Storage Facility partially offset by lower revenues in our West Coast NGL facility due to lower sales prices of natural gas liquids and lesser sales volumes of natural gas liquids as referenced in the volume section on the previous page.
Cost of Product Sold.Retail propane cost of product sold for the three months ended December 31, 2006 was $126.7 million compared to $159.6 million during the same three-month period in 2005. This $32.9 million, or 20.6%, decrease resulted from an approximate $24.5 million decline due to lower retail volume sales at our existing locations (as discussed above), an approximate $15.9 million decrease due to lesser non-cash charges from derivative contracts associated with retail propane fixed price sales contracts (as discussed below), and an approximate $1.3 million decrease attributable to a slight decline in the average cost of propane. These factors, which contributed to a decline in cost of product sold, were partially offset by an approximate $8.8 million increase due to acquisition-related volume. The $15.9 million lesser non-cash charges from derivative contracts associated with retail fixed price propane sales resulted from the adoption of a cash flow hedging policy during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006, which has the effect of matching the revenues and costs associated with product sales to the period in which the product is delivered to the customer. The Company recorded a $0.2 million non-cash charge during the three months ended December 31, 2006 as compared to a non-cash charge of $16.1 million recorded in the same three-month period in 2005.
Wholesale propane cost of product sold for the three months ended December 31, 2006 was $104.0 million, a decrease of $21.6 million or 17.2%, from $125.6 million during the same three-month period in 2005. Contributing to these lower costs was an approximate $18.5 million decline as a result of lower volumes sold by our wholesale propane operations (as discussed above), together with a $3.1 million decrease attributable to the lower average cost of propane.
Other retail cost of product sold was $25.3 million for the three months ended December 31, 2006, a decrease of $4.0 million or 13.7%, from $29.3 million during the same three-month period in 2005. This decrease was primarily the result of a $4.3 million decline due to lower volume sales of distillates (as discussed above), partially offset by a $0.3 million increase due to acquisition-related sales.
Fractionation, storage, and other midstream cost of product sold was $22.6 million for the three months ended December 31, 2006, a decrease of $0.7 million, or 3.0%, from $23.3 million during the same three-month period in 2005. This decrease was due primarily to lower price per gallon and lower volume of natural gas liquids sold to existing customers as discussed above.
Our retail cost of product sold consists primarily of tangible products sold including all propane, distillates and other natural gas liquids sold and all propane-related appliances sold. Other costs incurred in conjunction with the distribution of these products are included in operating and administrative expenses and consist primarily of wages to delivery personnel and delivery vehicle costs, including fuel costs, repair and maintenance and lease expense. These costs approximated $17.5 million and $16.6 million for the three months ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. In addition, depreciation expense associated with the delivery vehicles is reported within depreciation and amortization expense and amounted to $4.1 million and $3.9 million for the three months ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Since we include these costs in our operating and administrative expenses rather than in cost of product sold, our results may not be comparable to other entities in our lines of business if they include these costs in cost of product sold.
Gross Profit.Retail propane gross profit was $92.5 million for the three months ended December 31, 2006 compared to $77.8 million in the same three-month period in 2005. This $14.7 million, or 18.9%, increase was attributable to several factors, including an increase in margin per gallon, which accounted for approximately $8.8 million of this increase, as well as a $6.1 million increase related to higher retail gallons sold resulting from acquisitions. Also contributing to higher gross profit was the $15.9 million decrease in cost of product sold relating to the change in non-cash charges from derivative contracts associated with retail propane fixed price sales contracts (as discussed above). These factors, which contributed to a higher gross profit, were partially offset by an approximate $16.1 million reduction in retail propane gross profit at our existing locations as a result of lower volume sales as discussed above.
Wholesale propane gross profit decreased $0.1 million, or 2.3%, to $4.2 million for the three months ended December 31, 2006 compared to $4.3 million in the same three-month period in 2005, as a result of a $0.6 million decline due to lower volume sales, partially offset by a $0.5 million increase attributable to higher margins.
24
Table of Contents
Other retail gross profit decreased $0.5 million, or 2.5%, to $19.6 million for the three months ended December 31, 2006 compared to $20.1 million in the same three-month period in 2005. This decrease was due primarily to a $1.6 million decline resulting from lesser distillate volume sales (as described above), partially offset by a $1.1 million increase due to higher appliance and service gross profit relating to acquisitions.
Fractionation, storage, and other midstream gross profit was $12.8 million for the three months ended December 31, 2006 compared to $10.3 million in the same three-month period in 2005. This $2.5 million, or 24.3%, increase was due primarily to increased storage revenues, together with a $0.9 million increase due to the acquisition of the Bath Storage Facility. The remaining $0.2 million increase is due to other increases in midstream activities.
Operating and Administrative Expenses.Operating and administrative expenses decreased to $65.7 million for the three months ended December 31, 2006 compared to $69.0 million in the same three-month period in 2005. This $3.3 million decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in insurance costs, personnel expenses and other facility costs of $4.4 million, partially offset by increases in professional services costs and vehicle expenses of $1.1 million. The net decrease in operating expenses was partially the result of integration efficiencies realized in fiscal 2007 relating to prior year acquisitions together with less variable costs as a result of the lesser volumes sold.
Depreciation and Amortization.Depreciation and amortization increased to $20.5 million for the three months ended December 31, 2006 from $19.8 million during the same period in 2005, with the change primarily a result of acquisitions.
Interest Expense.Interest expense increased to $14.3 million for the three months ended December 31, 2006, compared to $13.6 million during the same three-month period in 2005, primarily due to an increase in the average debt outstanding associated with acquisitions as well as higher average interest rates. During the three months ended December 31, 2006, Inergy capitalized $0.6 million of interest related to certain capital improvement projects at our West Coast NGL and Stagecoach facilities as further described below in “Liquidity and Sources of Capital – Capital Resource Activities.”
Provision for Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes for the quarter ended December 31, 2006 was $0.2 million compared to a provision of $0.5 million in the same three-month period in 2005. The provision for income taxes for the three months ended December 31, 2006 was composed of $0.3 million of current income tax expense, which was partially offset by a $0.1 million deferred income tax benefit. The 2005 provision for income taxes of $0.5 million was composed of $0.8 million of current income tax expense and $0.3 million of deferred income tax benefit.
Interest of Non-Controlling Partners in Inergy’s Net (Income) Loss. We recorded expense of $21.4 million in the three months ended December 31, 2006, as compared to an expense of $6.2 million in the same three-month period of 2005 associated with the interests of non-controlling partners in Inergy. The $15.2 million change resulted primarily from an $18.7 million increase in Inergy’s net income, which had the effect of increasing the interest of non-controlling partners in Inergy’s net income. Also contributing to the change was a $2.0 million increase in incentive distribution rights received by the Company from Inergy, to which the non-controlling partners are not entitled, together with a $1.5 million increase in other related income from minority interests in Inergy.
Net Income.Net income was $7.1 million for the three months ended December 31, 2006 compared to net income of $3.7 million for the same three-month period in 2005. The $3.4 million increase in net income was primarily attributable to a higher gross profit at Inergy in the three months ended December 31, 2006, as well as a $3.3 million decrease in operating and administrative expenses. Partially offsetting these increases in net income was a $15.2 million decrease in income related to the interest of non-controlling partners in Inergy’s net income together with a $0.7 million increase in depreciation and amortization, and a $0.7 million increase in interest expense.
Seasonality
The retail market for propane is seasonal because it is used primarily for heating in residential and commercial buildings. Approximately three-quarters of our retail propane volume is sold during the peak heating season from October through March. Consequently, sales and operating profits are generated mostly in the first and fourth calendar quarters of each year.
25
Table of Contents
Liquidity and Sources of Capital
Capital Resource Activities
Inergy has identified growth projects related to its Stagecoach and West Coast NGL midstream assets that are expected to require a capital investment of approximately $257 million to complete. Through December 31, 2006, Inergy has invested approximately $35 million toward completion of these projects. These projects include expansion of the Stagecoach natural gas storage facility, which is expected to increase working storage capacity of natural gas to approximately 26.35 bcf through the addition of approximately 13.1 bcf of storage to the existing 13.25 bcf working storage capacity. All necessary regulatory approvals have been received and construction of the expansion is underway. The expanded facilities are expected to be in service by the fall of 2007. Stagecoach is also expected to construct a pipeline interconnect with the proposed Millennium Pipeline which will enhance and further diversify Inergy’s supply sources and provide interruptible wheeling services to the shipper community. In addition, Inergy presently has an agreement with a customer of Stagecoach whereby that customer provides certain asset management services through utilization of its firm storage capacity and related firm transportation on Tennessee Gas Pipeline. The agreement expires in June 2007 at which time Inergy will either renegotiate this agreement, execute a similar agreement with a different customer or internalize these asset management services within Stagecoach with an additional investment of approximately $26 million. However, Inergy is presently in negotiations with another customer and expects to execute a new asset management services agreement prior to June 2007. The West Coast project consists of the construction of a butane isomerization unit and related ancillary facilities, as well as the expansion of butane storage capacity. The isomerization unit is projected to have a capacity of 10,000 barrels per day and provide isobutane supplies to refiners or wholesale distributors for gasoline blending. This project is subject to regulatory approval by state and county agencies and is expected to be in service by July 2008.
Cash Flows and Contractual Obligations
Historically, we have relied on distributions from Inergy and on borrowings under our existing credit agreement to fund any cash requirements for our operations. We are, and have been for all periods presented, in compliance with all material financial covenants.
Net operating cash inflows (outflows) were $25.9 million and $(11.5) million for the three-month periods ending December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The $37.4 million increase in operating cash flows was primarily attributable to higher operating income and net changes in working capital balances.
Net investing cash outflows were $64.4 million and $160.2 million for the three-month periods ending December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Net cash outflows were primarily impacted by a $111.0 million decrease in cash outlays related to acquisitions, a $17.1 million increase in capital expenditures and a $2.0 million increase in proceeds received from the sale of property, plant and equipment.
Net financing cash inflows were $40.7 million and $188.7 million for the three-month periods ending December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Net cash inflows were primarily impacted by a $120.8 million decrease in proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt, net of payments on long-term debt, and a $24.9 million decrease in proceeds from the issuance of Inergy common units.
26
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2006(in millions):
Total | Less than 1 year | 1-3 years | 4-5 years | After 5 years | |||||||||||
Aggregate amount of principal and interest to be paid on the outstanding long-term debt(a) | $ | 1,184.4 | $ | 73.1 | $ | 144.2 | $ | 182.2 | $ | 784.9 | |||||
Amount of principal and interest to be paid on other long-term obligations | 10.8 | 2.6 | 8.2 | — | — | ||||||||||
Future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases | 21.4 | 6.3 | 8.6 | 3.4 | 3.1 | ||||||||||
Fixed price purchase commitments | 272.0 | 271.4 | 0.6 | — | — | ||||||||||
Standby letters of credit | 40.7 | 37.3 | 3.2 | 0.2 | — |
(a) | $247.2 million of our long-term debt, including interest rate swaps, is variable interest rate debt at prime rate or LIBOR plus an applicable spread. These rates plus their applicable spreads were between 7.10% and 8.50% at December 31, 2006. These rates have been applied for each period presented in the table. |
In addition to its fixed price purchase commitments, Inergy also had forward purchase energy contracts. As of December 31, 2006, Inergy’s total energy contracts had an outstanding net fair value of $11.4 million, as compared to a net fair value of $25.8 million as of December 31, 2005. This $14.4 million decrease includes a net decrease in fair value of $8.1 million from energy contracts settled and a net increase of $10.1 million from other changes in fair value related to net unrealized losses on energy contracts still outstanding. Of the outstanding fair value as of December 31, 2006, all energy contracts mature within fifteen months.
We believe that anticipated cash from operations and borrowing capacity under our credit facility and Inergy’s credit facility will be sufficient to meet our liquidity needs for the foreseeable future. If our plans or assumptions change or are inaccurate, or we make any acquisitions, we may need to raise additional capital.
Description of Credit Facilities
Inergy Holdings, L.P.
On July 22, 2005, we executed a credit agreement (“Bank Facility”) with a bank. The Bank Facility consists of a $15 million working capital revolver for Inergy Holdings, L.P. and a $5 million working capital revolver for IPCH Acquisition Corp. The maturity date of the Bank Facility is July 22, 2008, and is collateralized by certain of our interests in Inergy. In addition, the Bank Facility is guaranteed by Inergy Partners, LLC. The interest rates of these revolvers are based on prime rate and LIBOR plus the applicable spreads, which were 7.10% at December 31, 2006, for all outstanding debt under the Bank Facility. The Bank Facility contains several covenants which, among other things, require the maintenance of various financial performance ratios, restrict the payment of distributions to unit holders, and require financial reports to be submitted periodically to the financial institutions.
Inergy, L.P.
Inergy maintains borrowing capacity under a credit facility (“Credit Agreement”), which consists of a $75 million revolving working capital facility (“Working Capital Facility”) and a $350 million revolving acquisition facility (“Acquisition Facility”). The Credit Agreement accrues interest at either prime rate or LIBOR plus applicable spreads, resulting in interest rates between 7.10% and 8.50% at December 31, 2006. At December 31, 2006, borrowings outstanding under the Credit Agreement were $91.9 million, including $70.0 million under the Acquisition Facility and $21.9 million under the Working Capital Facility. On October 1, 2006, Inergy amended the Credit Agreement with existing lenders primarily to increase the effective amount of working capital borrowings available through the utilization of the Acquisition Facility from $75 million to $125 million. Other terms, conditions, and covenants remained materially unchanged. The Credit Agreement is guaranteed by each of Inergy’s domestic subsidiaries.
27
Table of Contents
During each fiscal year beginning October 1, the outstanding balance of the Working Capital Facility must be reduced to $10.0 million or less for a minimum of 30 consecutive days during the period commencing March 1 and ending September 30 of each calendar year.
At Inergy’s option, loans under the Credit Agreement bear interest at either the prime rate or LIBOR (preadjusted for reserves), plus, in each case, an applicable margin. The applicable margin varies quarterly based on its leverage ratio. Inergy also pays a fee based on the average daily unused commitments under the Credit Agreement.
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
Interest Rate Risk
Together with Inergy, we have long-term debt and revolving lines of credit subject to the risk of loss associated with movements in interest rates. At December 31, 2006, we had floating rate obligations totaling approximately $247.2 million for amounts borrowed under credit agreements and interest rate swaps, which convert fixed rate debt associated with the same amount of principal of the senior unsecured notes due 2014 to floating rate debt, with aggregate notional amounts of $125 million. The floating rate obligations expose us to the risk of increased interest expense in the event of increases in short-term interest rates.
If the floating rate were to fluctuate by 100 basis points from December 2006 levels, our interest expense would change by a total of approximately $2.5 million per year.
Commodity Price, Market and Credit Risk
Inherent in Inergy’s contractual portfolio are certain business risks, including market risk and credit risk. Market risk is the risk that the value of the portfolio will change, either favorably or unfavorably, in response to changing market conditions. Credit risk is the risk of loss from nonperformance by suppliers, customers or financial counterparties to a contract. Inergy takes an active role in managing and controlling market and credit risk and has established control procedures, which are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Inergy monitors market risk through a variety of techniques, including daily reporting of the portfolio’s position to senior management. Inergy attempts to minimize credit risk exposure through credit policies and periodic monitoring procedures as well as through customer deposits, letters of credit and entering into netting agreements that allow for offsetting counterparty receivable and payable balances for certain financial transactions, as deemed appropriate. The counterparties associated with assets from price risk management activities as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 were propane retailers, resellers, energy marketers and dealers.
The propane industry is a “margin-based” business in which gross profits depend on the excess of sales prices over supply costs. As a result, Inergy’s profitability will be sensitive to changes in wholesale prices of propane caused by changes in supply or other market conditions. When there are sudden and sharp increases in the wholesale cost of propane, Inergy may not be able to pass on these increases to its customers through retail or wholesale prices. Propane is a commodity and the price Inergy pays for it can fluctuate significantly in response to supply or other market conditions. Inergy has no control over supply or market conditions. In addition, the timing of cost pass-throughs can significantly affect margins. Sudden and extended wholesale price increases could reduce gross profits and could, if continued over an extended period of time, reduce demand by encouraging Inergy’s retail customers to conserve or convert to alternative energy sources.
Inergy engages in hedging and risk management transactions, including various types of forward contracts, options, swaps and futures contracts, to reduce the effect of price volatility on Inergy’s product costs, protect the value of its inventory positions, and to help ensure the availability of propane during periods of short supply. Inergy attempts to balance its contractual portfolio by purchasing volumes only when it has a matching purchase commitment from its wholesale customers. However, Inergy may experience net unbalanced positions from time to time which it believes to be immaterial in amount. In addition to Inergy’s ongoing policy to maintain a balanced position, for accounting purposes Inergy is required, on an ongoing basis, to track and report the market value of its derivative portfolio.
28
Table of Contents
Notional Amounts and Terms
The notional amounts and terms of Inergy’s derivative financial instruments include the following at December 31, 2006 and September 30, 2006(in millions):
December 31, 2006 | September 30, 2006 | |||||||
Fixed Price Payor | Fixed Price Receiver | Fixed Price Payor | Fixed Price Receiver | |||||
Propane and heating oil (barrels) | 5.6 | 5.5 | 8.0 | 7.5 | ||||
Natural gas (MMBTU’s) | 5.6 | 5.6 | 5.5 | 5.4 |
Notional amounts reflect the volume of transactions, but do not accurately measure our exposure to market or credit risks.
Fair Value
The fair value of the derivatives and inventory exchange contracts related to price risk management activities as of December 31, 2006 and September 30, 2006 was assets of $54.7 million and $46.2 million, respectively, and liabilities of $43.3 million and $49.0 million, respectively. All intercompany transactions have been appropriately eliminated.
The following table summarizes the change in the unrealized fair value of energy derivative contracts related to Inergy’s risk management activities for the three months ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 where settlement has not yet occurred(in millions):
Three Months Ended December 31, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Net fair value gain (loss) of contracts outstanding at beginning of period | $ | (2.8 | ) | $ | 8.8 | |||
Net change in physical exchange contracts | 12.2 | 23.0 | ||||||
Change in fair value of contracts attributable to market movement during the period | 10.1 | (4.0 | ) | |||||
Realized gains | (8.1 | ) | (2.0 | ) | ||||
Net fair value of contracts outstanding at end of period | $ | 11.4 | $ | 25.8 | ||||
Inergy uses observable market values for determining the fair value of its trading instruments. In cases where actively quoted prices are not available, other external sources are used which incorporate information about commodity prices in actively quoted markets, quoted prices in less active markets and other market fundamental analysis. Inergy’s risk management department regularly compares valuations to independent sources and models.
Of the outstanding fair value as of December 31, 2006, all contracts had a maturity of fifteen months or less.
Sensitivity Analysis
A theoretical change of 10% in the underlying commodity value would result in a change of approximately $0.1 million in the market value of the contracts as there were approximately 0.7 million gallons of net unbalanced positions at December 31, 2006.
29
Table of Contents
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
We maintain controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the rules and forms of the SEC, and that information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such terms are defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act). Based upon that evaluation, management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were adequate and effective as of December 31, 2006. There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13(e)-15 or Rule 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) or in other factors during the fiscal year covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
30
Table of Contents
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings |
Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements, Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10Q is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
There have been no material changes to the risk factors as previously disclosed in Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2006.
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
None.
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
None.
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
None.
Item 5. | Other Information |
None.
Item 6. | Exhibits |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Inergy Holdings, L.P. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Inergy Holdings, L.P pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Inergy Holdings, L.P. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Inergy Holdings, L.P. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31
Table of Contents
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
INERGY HOLDINGS, L.P. | ||||||
By: | INERGY HOLDINGS GP, LLC | |||||
(its general partner) | ||||||
Date: February 7, 2007 | By: | /s/ R. Brooks Sherman, Jr. | ||||
R. Brooks Sherman, Jr. | ||||||
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | ||||||
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
32