As previously disclosed, (i) on November 1, 2020, Endurance International Group Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “merger agreement”) with Endure Digital Intermediate Holdings, Inc. (formerly known as Razorback Technology Intermediate Holdings, Inc.) (“Parent”) and Endure Digital, Inc. (formerly known as Razorback Technology, Inc.), a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (“Merger Sub”), providing for the merger of Merger Sub with and into the Company, with the Company surviving the merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent (the “merger”); (ii) on December 8, 2020, a lawsuit, captioned Stamps v. Endurance International Group Holdings Inc., Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-10321, was filed against the Company and each of the Company’s directors in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; (iii) on December 11, 2020, a lawsuit, captioned Baker v. Endurance International Group Holdings Inc., Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-01691, was filed against the Company and each of the Company’s directors in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware; (iv) on December 18, 2020, a lawsuit, captioned Heinrich v. Endurance International Group Holdings Inc., Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-03702, was filed against the Company and each of the Company’s directors in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado; (v) on December 23, 2020, a lawsuit, captioned Wilhelm v. Endurance International Group Holdings, Inc., Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-03779, was filed against the Company and each of the Company’s directors in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado; and (vi) also on December 23, 2020, a lawsuit, captioned Johnson v. Endurance International Group Holdings, Inc., Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-10889, was filed against the Company and each of the Company’s directors in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The actions referenced in clauses (ii) through (vi) above are referred to collectively as the “Federal Actions.” Each of the Federal Actions alleges violations of Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 14a-9 promulgated thereunder against the defendants for allegedly disseminating a materially incomplete and misleading proxy statement in connection with the proposed merger. The plaintiffs in the Federal Actions seek various forms of injunctive and declaratory relief, as well as awards of damages, costs, expert fees and attorneys’ fees.
The Company believes that no further supplemental disclosure is required under applicable laws and that the definitive proxy statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on December 14, 2020 (the “Proxy Statement”) disclosed all material information required to be disclosed therein. However, to avoid the risk of the Federal Actions delaying or adversely affecting the merger and to minimize the expense of defending such actions, it has agreed to make certain supplemental disclosures related to the proposed merger, all of which are set forth below and which should be read in conjunction with the Proxy Statement.