Vik Chopra
Analyst, Wells Fargo Securities LLC
Great. Super helpful. And then my follow-up question was, I guess, how is the team thinking about the progression of investment in innovation over the next couple of years, given this deal specifically as it relates to Pulse and the Globus’ recon robot? Thanks so much.
Daniel T. Scavilla
President, Chief Executive Officer & Director, Globus Medical, Inc.
No. I appreciate that. So again, keep in mind, Globus by itself, we’ve always invested without hindrance. So the joint robot will progress without any issues, we’ll keep that on path. Truthfully, it’s too early for us to say we know how best to fit the Pulse technology into our enabling technology. It’s one of the next steps, and when we get into the closing, we’ll have a better feel for that. But again, let’s recognize they’re both valuable, and we’re going to look and see how do we optimize. Now, we can look at them through a different lens.
Operator: Thank you. One moment for our next question. Our next question will come from the line of Shagun Singh from RBC Capital Markets. Your line is open.
Shagun Singh
Analyst, RBC Capital Markets LLC
Great. Thank you so much for taking the question and congratulations. I was just wondering if you could provide a little bit of a background on how this transaction came about, why now, what changes are you seeing broadly in the healthcare environment, and if there were any other companies involved. And then, I guess, with respect to my second question, just looking back at spine transactions, historically, they have been pretty challenging, and a lot of that has to do with culture and also the customer stickiness. So how are you thinking about those items as you look to close the deal? Thank you.
Daniel T. Scavilla
President, Chief Executive Officer & Director, Globus Medical, Inc.
Thanks, Shagun. I would tell you that the deal came about naturally just through conversation. I think both of us had always looked at each other and realized that the combined is stronger than the individuals. It was really just a conversation that I have had with Chris that sort of progressed through and said, let’s go further, and the more we looked at this and understood the complementary nature, I think the more both Chris and I got into realizing this is a deal. So the boards got involved and went. I would tell you that, in our transactions, our conversations, there were no other parties involved. It was simply just us going through and saying what’s best for our companies, what’s best for our patients and surgeons and our shareholders, came about that ourselves.
Your second question is a great one, because I know there is a mindset out there that these things don’t work, they tend to fail. And I can think, we could all point to a few that worked really well, factoring number one physicians, and others who may not have. But keep in mind, that we are spine companies and our primary focus is spine companies, and we’re both innovative share taking companies going this way. And while there’ll be natural cultural differences, the complementary nature of everything that we have really I think, is going to put us in a stronger spot. The fact that we are primary spine companies and other acquisitions may have been adjacencies, I really do think put us in a stronger spot. We’re not looking to untangle overlapping sales forces. We’re not looking to untangle, overlapping buildings. There’s a lot there that is really going towards us to make this a successful outcome.
Shagun Singh
Analyst, RBC Capital Markets LLC
Thank you.