Entourage Mining 20F/A 2007 Annual report (foreign) (amended)

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 20-F/A

[ ] REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 2007

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______________ to _______________

Commission file number000-50305

ENTOURAGE MINING LTD.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Province of British Columbia, Canada
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

475 Howe Street, Suite 614, Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 2B3
(Address of principal executive offices)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.

Title of each class	Name of each exchange on which registered
N/A	N/A

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act.

Common Shares Without Par Value
(Title of Class)

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act.

None
(Title of Class)

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer's classes of capital or common
stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report:
76,981,894 common shares

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act
[ ] Yes [X] No

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports
pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
[ ] Yes [X] No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
[X] Yes [ ] No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.
See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12-b of the Exchange Act (Check One):

Large Accelerated Filer [ ] Accelerated Filer [ ] Non-accelerated Filer [X]

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements
included in this filing:

U.S. GAAP [X]

International Financial Reporting Standards as Issued
By the International Accounting Standards Board [ ]

Other [ ]

If this is an Annual Report, indicate by a check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act) [ ] Yes [X] No

ENTOURAGE MINING LTD.
Form 20-F Annual Report
Table of Contents

	Part I	4

Item 1.	Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers	4
Item 2.	Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable	4
Item 3.	Key Information	4
Item 4.	Information on the Company	9
Item 5.	Operating and Financial Review and Prospects	19
Item 6.	Directors, Senior Management and Employees	21
Item 7.	Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions	24
Item 8.	Financial Information	26
Item 9.	The Offer and Listing	27
Item 10.	Additional Information	28
Item 11.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	32
Item 12.	Description of Securities other than Equity Securities	32

	Part II	32

Item 13.	Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies	32
Item 14.	Material Modifications to the Rights of Securities Holders and Use of Proceeds	32
Item 15.	Controls and Procedures	32
Item 16A.	Audit Committee Financial Expert	34
Item 16B.	Code of Ethics	34
Item 16C.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	34
Item 16E.	Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers	35

	Part III	35

Item 17.	Financial Statements	35
Item 18.	Financial Statements	61
Item 19.	Exhibits	31

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

We caution you that certain important factors (including without limitation those set forth in this Form 20-F) may affect our actual results and could cause such results to differ materially from any forward-looking statements that may be deemed to have been made in this Form 20-F annual report, or that are otherwise made by or on our behalf. For this purpose, any statements contained in this annual report that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, words such as “may,” “except,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “could,” estimate,” or “continue,” or the negative or other variations of comparable terminology, are intended to identify forward-looking statements.

PART I

ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS

Not applicable

ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

Not applicable

ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION

3.A Selected Financial Data

The following tables set forth our financial data for the last five years ended December 31. We derived all figures from our financial statements, which were examined by our independent auditors. This information should be read in conjunction with our financial statements included in this annual report.

Our financial statements included in this annual report and the table set forth below, have been prepared in accordance U.S. GAAP. All amounts are expressed in Canadian dollars.

Selected Financial Data
(CDN$, except per share data)

	Year Ended 12/31/07	Year Ended 12/31/06	Year Ended 12/31/05	Year Ended 12/31/04	Year Ended 12/31/03
Revenue	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil
Net Income (Loss)	(598,783)	(2,973,161)	(10,068,841)	(956,446)	(319,515)
Earnings(Loss) Per Share	(0.01)	(0.04)	(0.57)	(0.06)	(0.04)

Dividends Per Share	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil
Wtd.Avg.No.Shares	76,751,437	74,380,281	17,647,542	15,542,822	9,127,950

Working Capital	(139,410)	87,596	323,563	138,483	(230,498)
Mineral Properties	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil
Long Term Debt	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil


Shareholder’s Equity (Deficit)	(136,647)	91,312	328,583	145,292	(421,314)
Total Assets	22,570	193,763	514,036	466,727	106,702

In this Annual Report, unless otherwise specified, all dollar amounts are expressed in Canadian dollars.

Since June 1, 1970, the government of Canada has permitted a floating exchange rate to determine the value of the Canadian dollar as compared to the United States dollar.On June 23, 2008, the exchange rate in effect for Canadian dollars exchanged for United States dollars (the US dollars that a Canadian dollar buys) was $0.9840. This exchange rate is based on the noon buying rates in New York City, for cable transfers in Canadian dollars, as certified for customs purposes by the Bank of Canada. For the past five years ended December 31 and for the last six month ends from December 31, 2007 to May 31, 2008, the following exchange rates were in effect for Canadian dollars exchanged for United States dollars (the US dollars that a Canadian dollar buys), calculated in the same manner as above:

Annual Period	Average
Year ended Dec 31, 2007	$0.9913
Year ended Dec. 31, 2006	$0.8789
Year ended Dec 31, 2005	$0.8818
Year ended Dec 31, 2004	$0.8254
Year ended Dec 31, 2003	$0.7936

Monthly Period	Low - High

Month ended Dec 31, 2007	$0.9756 -$1.0250
Month ended Jan 31, 2008	$0.9644 -$1.0151
Month ended Feb 29, 2008	$0.9805 -$1.0298.
Month ended Mar 31, 2008	$0.9805 -$1.0241.
Month ended Apr 30, 2008	$0.9713 -$1.0241.
Month ended May 31, 2008	$0.9761 -$1.0179.

The above information was obtained from the Bank of Canada and we believe closely approximate the rates certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank in New York.

3.B Capitalization and indebtedness

Not applicable

3.C Reasons for the offer and use of proceeds

Not applicable

3.D Risk factors

Any investment in our common shares involves a high degree of risk. You should consider carefully the following information before you decide to buy our common shares. If any of the events discussed in the following risk factors actually occurs, our business, financial condition or results of operations would likely suffer. In this case, the market price of our common shares could decline, and you could lose all or part of your investment in our shares. In particular, you should consider carefully the following risk factors:

We have a history of losses.

We have incurred losses in our business operations since inception, and we expect that we will continue to lose money for the foreseeable future. From our incorporation to December 31, 2007, we have incurred losses totaling $15,555,717. Very few junior resource companies ever become profitable and typically incur large losses until they enter production or are able to sell a mineral property to a major resource company. Failure to achieve and maintain profitability may adversely affect the market price of our common shares.

Very few mineral properties are ultimately developed into producing mines.

The business of exploration for minerals and mining involves a high degree of risk. Few properties that are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines. Most exploration projects do not result in the discovery of commercially mineable deposits of ore.

Substantial expenditures will be required for us to establish ore reserves through drilling, to develop metallurgical processes, to extract the metal from the ore and to develop the mining and processing facilities and infrastructure at any site chosen for mining.

Although substantial benefits may be derived from the discovery of a major mineral deposit, no assurance can be given that we will discover minerals in sufficient quantities to justify commercial operations or that we can obtain the funds required for development on a timely basis. The economics of developing precious and base metal mineral properties is affected by many factors including the cost of operations, variations in the grade of ore mined, fluctuations in metal markets, costs of processing equipment and other factors such as government regulations, including regulations relating to royalties, allowable production, importing and exporting of minerals and environmental protection.

If we do not obtain additional financing, our business will fail.

Our current operating funds are less than necessary to acquire an interest in, and to conduct exploration on, a mineral property, and therefore we will need to obtain additional financing in order to complete our business plan. As at December 31, 2007, we had cash on hand of $2,239 and a working capital deficiency of $139,410. As of this report the Company has cash on hand of approximately $4,200 and a working capital deficiency of $390,000 Our business plan calls for significant expenses in connection with the acquisition and exploration of mineral claims. We will require additional financing in order to complete these activities. In addition, we will require additional financing to sustain our business operations if we are not successful in earning revenues once we complete exploration on any mineral property we acquire. We do not currently have any arrangements for financing and we can provide no assurance to investors that we will be able to find such financing if required.

We believe the only realistic source of future funds presently available to us is through the sale of equity capital. Any sale of share capital will result in dilution to existing shareholders.

Because management has only limited formal training in resource exploration, the business has a higher risk of failure.

None of our directors or officers has any significant technical training or experience in resource exploration or mining. We rely on the opinions of consulting geologists that we retain from time to time for specific exploration projects or property reviews. As a result of our management’s lack of formal training in resource exploration, there may be a higher risk of our being unable to complete our business plan.

Mineral exploration involves a high degree of risk against which we are not currently insured.

Unusual or unexpected rock formations, formation pressures, fires, power outages, labour disruptions, flooding, cave-ins, landslides and the inability to obtain suitable or adequate machinery, equipment or labour are risks involved in the operation of mines and the conduct of exploration programs. We have relied on and will continue to rely upon consultants and others for exploration expertise.

It is not always possible to fully insure against such risks and we may decide not to take out insurance against such risks as a result of high premiums or other reasons. Should such liabilities arise, they could reduce or eliminate any future profitability and result in increasing costs and a decline in the value of our common stock.

We may require permits and licenses that we may not be able to obtain.

Our operations may require licenses and permits from various governmental authorities. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain all necessary licenses and permits that may be required to conduct exploration, development and mining operations at any projects we acquire. Furthermore, as mineral projects near completion proper permitting and environmental review may be required.

Metal prices fluctuate widely.

Factors beyond our control may affect the marketability of any resource we discover. Metal prices have fluctuated widely, particularly in recent years. The effect of these factors cannot accurately be predicted.

The resource industry is very competitive.

The resource industry is intensely competitive in all its phases. We compete with many companies possessing greater financial resources and technical facilities than us for the acquisition of mineral concessions, claims, leases and other mineral interests as well as for the recruitment and retention of qualified employees.

Our operations may be adversely affected by environmental regulations.

Our operations may be subject to environmental regulations promulgated by government agencies from time to time. Environmental legislation provides for restrictions and prohibitions on spills, release or emissions of various substances produced in association with certain mining industry operations, such as seepage from tailings disposal areas, which would result in environmental pollution. A breach of such legislation may result in the imposition of fines and penalties. In addition, certain types of operations require the submission and approval of environmental impact assessments. Environmental legislation is evolving in a manner, which means that standards, enforcement, fines and penalties for non-compliance are more stringent. Environmental assessments of proposed projects carry a heightened degree of responsibility for us and our directors, officers and consultants. The cost of compliance with changes in governmental regulations has a potential to reduce the profitability of our operations.

We do not maintain environmental liability insurance.

The trading market for our shares is not always liquid.

Although our shares trade on the NASD OTC Bulletin Board, the volume of shares traded at any one time can be limited, and, as a result, there may not be a liquid trading market for our shares.

Our securities may be subject to penny stock regulation.

Our stock may be subject to “penny stock” rules as defined in 1934 Securities and Exchange Act rule 3151-1. The Commission has adopted rules that regulate broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in penny stocks. Our common shares are subject to these penny stock rules. Transaction costs associated with purchases and sales of penny stocks are likely to be higher than those for other securities. Penny stocks generally are equity securities with a price of less than U.S. $5.00 (other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges or quoted on the NASDAQ system, provided that current price and volume information with respect to transactions in such securities is provided by the exchange or system).

The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document that provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction, and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. The bid and offer quotations, and the broker-dealer and salesperson compensation information, must be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before or with the customer’s confirmation.

In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from such rules, the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for our common shares in the United States and shareholders may find it more difficult to sell their shares.

ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

4.A History and development of the Company

Our Registered Office in British and principal office is located at 614 – 475 Howe Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

We were originally incorporated under the name, Entourage Holdings Ltd., pursuant to the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) on June 16, 1995. On June 25, 1996, we changed our name to Entourage Mining Ltd.

On February 18, 1998, we became a reporting Issuer as defined under the Securities Act of the Province of British Columbia, Canada.

We have one subsidiary company, Entourage USA Inc., located at 711 S. Carson Street, Suite 4, Carson City, NV 89701. At present this subsidiary is inactive.

Selected Financial Data
(CDN$, except per share data)

	Year Ended 12/31/07	Year Ended 12/31/06	Year Ended 12/31/05	Year Ended 12/31/04	Year Ended 12/31/03
Revenue	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil
Net Income (Loss)	(598,783)	(2,973,161)	(10,068,841)	(956,446)	(319,515)
Earnings(Loss) Per Share	(0.01)	(0.04)	(0.57)	(0.06)	(0.04)
Dividends Per Share	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil
Wtd.Avg.No.Shares	76,751,437	74,380,281	17,647,542	15,542,822	9,127,950

Working Capital (Deficiency)	(139,410)	87,596	323,563	138,483	(230,498)
Mineral Properties	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil
Long Term Debt	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil

Shareholder’s Equity (Deficit)	(136,647 )	91,312	328,583	145,292	(230,498)
Total Assets	22,570	193,763	514,036	466,727	106,702

The subsidiary company will seek mineral prospects in the United States.

We are engaged in the business of acquiring and exploring resource properties.

We are a reporting issuer in the United States and our Annual Report and 6K filings can be found on the SEC’s EDGAR system atwww.sec.gov. We are a reporting issuer in certain Canadian jurisdictions and our required disclosure filings for Canada can be found at www.sedar.com.

We are a natural resource company engaged in the acquisition and exploration of natural resource properties. We commenced operations in 1996 and currently has one mineral property option agreement:

to acquire an 80% interest in 20 prospective diamond exploration claims situated in the Forte a la Corne/Smeaton area of central Saskatchewan; and

an unencumbered 80%interest:
in 47 claim uranium prospective claim blocks in Costebelle Township known as the Doran property;

We also intend to seek and acquire additional properties worthy of exploration and development.

Hatchet Lake Properties (Abandoned)

By agreement dated April 7, 2005 as amended October 20, 2005, the Company obtained an option to acquire up to a 50% right in a certain prospective mineral property located in the Athabaska Basin area of Saskatchewan (the “Hatchet Lake Property”). 40% of the Company’s interest in the Hatchet Lake property was acquired by way of an October 20, 2005 assignment agreement among Entourage Mining Ltd., United Uranium Corp. (formerly United Carina Resources Corp.) and CMKM Diamonds Inc. (“CMKM”), a now defunct OTCBB Pink Sheet issuer.

As a result of this assignment agreement, and the subsequent “New Hatchet Lake Option Agreement”, also dated October 20, 2005, the Company had acquired a right to earn a 50% interest in the Hatchet Lake property.

As consideration for the assignment agreement, the Company agreed to issue 15,000,000 of its common shares (issued January 3, 2006) to the CMKM shareholders. The 15,000,000 shares were to be distributed to the CMKM shareholders, but these shares have not been distributed at the time of this report and there is no indication when or if this distribution may occur.

On June 30^th, 2007, United Uranium Corp. extended a July 1, 2007 $300,000 payment deadline, to be paid by the Company, until September 15, 2007. No summer or fall 2007 work program was proposed by United Uranium Corp. so the Company decided that the scant uranium values of two previous abbreviated drill programs (7 ½ drill holes over two years) did not warrant the $300,000 payment and the Company abandoned the Hatchet Lake Uranium prospect.

As well (see note 10 of the attached financial statements), since CMKM failed to distribute the 45,000, (15,000,000 for Hatchet property and 30,000,000 for Smeaton property) shares and because 101047025 Saskatchewan Ltd. (“1010”), in the opinion of the Company, failed to operate the Smeaton property in an operator like fashion and failed to comply with the Company’s various requests to have all previous claim materials sent to the Company, on August 27, 2007, the Company filed, in the Supreme Court of British Columbia, a Writ of Summons and Statement of Claim against 1010and CMKM seeking to have the court set aside the October 20, 2005 Mineral Property Option and Assignment Agreements for Hatchet and Smeaton property between the Company and the Defendants (collectively, the “Contracts”) and requesting that the defendants return the 45,000,000 shares (the “Shares”) paid to CMKM and the 3,888,888 shares paid to 1010 to consummate these agreements. This matter has yet to be resolved in the Courts.

The Black Warrior Project (Abandoned)

In June 2004, we announced that we signed a definitive agreement with Goodsprings Development Corp. (“Goodsprings”), a Nevada based corporation, whereby we may earn a 100% interest in the GBW project in Esmeralda County, Nevada commonly known as the “Black Warrior Project” in the Company’s other disclosure documents. The agreement between Goodsprings and Entourage is a sub-lease agreement to the original property agreement between Goodsprings and Apex Deep Mines, also a Nevada based company.

All payment required under the Entourage-Goodsprings Agreement were paid in a timely manner. The Company drilled 11 holes on the Black Warrior project. The initial 9 holes did not find anomalous gold or silver showings however the final two holes intersected 30 feet of slightly anomalous gold values ranging up to .435 g/t. There was $76,670.59 exploration work done on the Black Warrior Project in this year but in November 2006 the Company informed Goodsprings that the Company was relinquishing its interest in the Black Warrior project.

The Company advanced Goodsprings $7,500 to reclaim the property and to remediate it to its natural state. Some time in 2007, after the remediated areas pass the scrutiny of the Bureau of Land Management (the “BLM”) the Company will be reimbursed a portion of the $11,400 reclamation bond posted by the Company in May 2005. As well, the Company has been informed by Goodsprings that less than $7,500 was required to remediate the property but both parties agreed that any residual would remain with Goodsprings until the BLM refunded the reclamation bond. The BLM reported to the Company in May 2007 that the Company was eligible to receive 60% of its remediation deposit by making application and the Company has done so. During 2007, 60% of the Company’s BLM deposit was received and the remaining 40% will be held back until sometime in 2009.

Smeaton/Forte a la Corne Property

On October 20, 2005, the Company announced a series of property option (earn-in interest) agreements (the “Saskatchewan Property transactions”) with CMKM, United Carina Resources Corp. and 1010 (a private company), whereby the Company assumed the earn-in rights to properties optioned to CMKM. CMKM was about to default on its option agreements and the Company realized an opportunity to acquire prospective diamond and uranium prospects in Saskatchewan. One such property is termed the Smeaton/Forte a la Corne/Green Lake Diamond prospect (the “Smeaton Property”).

Upon signing the Smeaton Property consisted of a 1.5 million acre parcel of claims. Previous to the Entourage-CMKM agreements, CMKM and 1010 had flown an airborne geophysical survey of the Smeaton Properties. The Company’s geologist, James Turner, P. Geo., reviewed the results of the survey and reported to the Company that 20 priority diamond targets existed on the parcel, but in light of the $12 hectare maintenance fees payable, certain of the claims should be allowed to lapse for lack of potential. The present parcel remains at approximately 22 claims.

In December 2005, the Operator, without prior consent of the Company, commenced drilling on a priority target on the property. This drilling encountered kimberlitic rock at approximately 530 feet and continued in kimberlite for over 300 feet eventually ending in dolomites at about 900 feet. An independent kimberlite expert, Harrison Cookenboo, (PhD, P. Geo.), a qualified person, reviewed initial samples and concluded:

“both pieces of core are in most respects closely similar to macro-crystic serpentine calcite kimberlite, but with some atypical features for kimberlite“sensu-stricto”, and suggests that the examined samples are best referred to as kimberlite or a closely related “kimberlitic” rock type with the potential for carrying diamonds”.

On January 10, 2006, the Operator informed the Company that the first drill target (Target: C-Gpp) on the Smeaton Property had been completed after encountering difficult drilling 1000 feet into the target. The hole finished in dolomites and the Operator decided to drill the second hole 30 meters to the northwest where geo-physical data implied that the center of the kimberlite may be situated.

The kimberlitic rock from the first drill hole was sent to Saskatchewan Research Council for caustic fusion and micro-diamond analysis. The kimberltic rock did not yield any micro-diamonds however chromites were found in the drill core. In 2005, the Company expended $200,630.00 on the Smeaton prospect; the Smeaton project has 20 priority targets to be investigated and as of the date of this report has examined four of these targets.

There has been no additional work done on the Smeaton claims subsequent to the Company’s drilling of January 2006. The Company has requested of 1010, all information on the Smeaton claims so that a compliant NI 43-101 Technical Report could be commissioned for the Smeaton claims however 1010 has not responded to these requests. The Company considers these claims as non-operational until such a report can be completed. Furthermore 1010 has never consulted the Company before commencing drilling on the Smeaton properties and no budgets or plans were discussed before exploration work was carried out.

In early 2006, the Company advised 1010, which acts as the Operator of the property, that it would not participate in any further exploration by 1010 unless the exploration was conducted in accordance with NI 43-101 recommendations and mining best practices which to date have not been met. 1010 nevertheless proceeded to perform work on the property and, on March 26, 2006, sent invoices to the Company totaling approximately $280,122.53.

The Company believes that it is not liable, under the terms of the Agreement or in any other way, for these invoices and has so advised 1010, most recently in its letter to 1010 dated April 27, 2007. To date, no collections or other proceedings have been commenced by 1010.

There is, however, the risk that 1010 might commence collections or other proceedings. In that event, while the Company would vigorously defend its position that it is not liable in any way for funds claimed pursuant to the invoices, there is the risk that a proceeding by 1010 could be successful. The Company cannot assess the probability of that risk and accordingly, the likelihood of loss, if any, is presently not determinable.

The Company issued 33,888,888 shares of the Company stock as consideration for the purchase of the Smeaton claims. 30,000,000 (thirty million) of these shares were to be distributed to the CMKM shareholders but these shares have not been distributed at this time and there is no indication when, or if, these shares will be distributed.

Since CMKM failed to distribute the 45,000,000 (15,000,000 for Hatchet property and 30,000,000 for Smeaton property) consideration shares and because 1010, in the opinion of the Company, failed to operate the property in an operator like fashion and failed to comply with the Company’s various requests to have all previous claim materials

sent to the Company, on August 27, 2007, the Company filed, in the Supreme Court of British Columbia, a Writ of Summons and Statement of Claim against 1010 and CMKM seeking to have the court set aside the October 25, 2005 Mineral Property Option and Assignment Agreements between the Company and the Defendants (collectively, the “Contracts”) and requesting that the defendants return the 45,000,000 shares (the “Shares”) paid to CMKM and the 3,888,888 shares paid to 1010 to consummate these agreements. This matter has yet to be resolved in the Courts, (see note 10 of the attached financial statements).

The Doran Uranium Property

In March of 2005, the Company entered into an option agreement with Fayz Yacoub, a professional geologist and businessman from Vancouver, whereby the Company could acquire 44 claim blocks prospective for uranium situated in Costebelle Township in eastern Quebec. Subsequent to entering into the property agreement, 3 additional claims blocks have been added to the project.

The Doran Uranium property consists of 47-contiguous mineral claims (polygons) covering approximately 2473.3 hectares in the Baie Johan Beetz area of Costebelle Township, Quebec. The claim block is centered at GPS 548009 E and 5572265 N.

The Doran property is located in the southeastern part of Quebec, along the north shore of the Gulf of St. Lawrence, and about 25 kilometers west of Aguanish, approximately 109 kilometers east of Havre St. Pierre. The property extends inland from the Gulf of St Lawrence a distance of approximately 10 kilometers to the north.

The property is situated within the Costebelle Township, NTS map sheet 12 L/08. Access to the property is by daily scheduled flights to Natashquan-Aguanish, then by car from Aguanish to the Pashshibou River and to the southern part of the property.

The topography of the property for the most part is rolling hills having a maximum relief of 100 meters with elevation ranging from sea level to 100 meters. All mineralized areas of interest are located comfortably above sea and river levels..

Exploration, including geological mapping, rock sampling, trenching and shallow drilling on the Doran Uranium Deposit resulted in the estimation of a historical uranium resource which requires verification to conform to Canadian NI 43-101 geological reporting standards. Before these standards were initiated, previous work on the property, done by Aguanish Uranium Inc., Noranda and Lacana Mining, was successful in locating and partially exposing several potential target areas, including the Doran East Centre target where three holes were drilled (1978) 14 feet apart with cores returning values of 6.4, 6.4 and 9.2 Lbs. Per ton uranium (U3 O8).

Entourage made a down payment of $35,000 to acquire the option and agreed to a work commitment of $200,000 of exploration in the first year of the Doran Uranium Property agreement.

The Company expended $245,591.00 in exploration work on the property in fiscal year 2005 and a compliant report by Eric Ostensoe (P. Geo,) was commissioned. In late February 2006, Mr. Ostensoe completed his report and the Company posted the report on Sedar and Edgar (March 09, 2006) as well as the Company website. In April 2007 an updated NI 43-101 Technical Report was prepared by Michel Proulx, M. Sc., P. Geo and Michel Boilly, Ph D, P Geo, both Qualified Persons as that term is described in National Instrument 43-101, and this report was filed on Sedar by Abbastar Holdings Ltd. on May 2, 2007.

In May 2006, the Company advanced to On Track Explorations, the Doran project operator, $150,000CDN to commence drilling and ground exploration work as outlined in Mr. Ostensoe’s report. Drilling commenced thereafter on the “Main Zone” of the Doran property. The Company’s option agreement on the Doran property requires that the Company expend $300,000 in year two of the agreement.

The Company spent $346,166 on drilling and exploration in fiscal 2006 and reported drill results on July 20, 2006. As well, in July the Government of Quebec reimbursed the Company $57,745 as part of the Province’s mining exploration incentive program. This rebate was based upon the Company’s 2005 drilling exploration expenses.

In early February 2007 the Company contracted the services of Forages La Virole to commence drilling on the “L” anomaly situated in the north of the Doran property but four to six foot snow drifts prevented the drilling contractor from reaching the “L” anomaly so the work program was cancelled.

On February 13, 2007, the Company entered into a Mineral Property Option agreement with Abbastar Holdings Ltd. (“Abbastar”), a Vancouver based TSX Venture listed company, whereby “Abbastar” could earn up to 70% interest in the Doran property by paying the Company a one time $100,000 CDN payment (paid) and expending $5,000,000 (five million) over four years. The TSX Venture Exchange approved this transaction on May 30, 2007.

On May 11, 2007, the Company and Abbastar announced that drilling had commenced on the “L” anomaly of the Doran project and in all 32 holes were drilled for a total of 3,273.26 meters of diamond drilling and 1158 samples were analyzed representing 2,469.24 linear meters or 75% of the drill hole length. The results of the Company’s Phase II drilling campaign were reported August 23, 2007. Here is a sample of these results:

Hole H17A (L Anomaly): 16.99m of 0.0435% U3O8 (.87lb/t),
Hole H18 (L Anomaly): 24.1m of 0.033% U3O8 (.66lb/t) (including 16.5m of .73lb/t announced June 28, 2007),
Hole H18A (L Anomaly): 7.25m of 0.023% U3O8 (.46lb/t),
Hole H19 (L Anomaly): 3.52m of 0.039% U3O8 (.78lb/t),
Hole H22 (L Anomaly): 18.44m of 0.024% U3O8 (.48lb/t),
Hole H27 (L Anomaly): 5.8m of 0.33% U3O8 (.66lb/t),
Hole H31 (N Anomaly): 0.66 meters of .29%U3O8 (5.8lb/t)(at surface).

The holes were divided into four zones with particular emphasis on the “L” zone where 18 drill holes were spotted to evaluate the lateral and depth extensions of this zone. The first four drill holes (17,17A, 18, 18A) drilled at different azimuths and plunge angles and set up to test the L19 anomaly, recorded encouraging near surface results including 16.99 meters (55 feet) of .87lb/short ton U3O8 and 24.1 meters (79 feet) of .66lb/ton U3O8, as well, holes 27 and 27A, intersected three and four pegmatites respectively. The first pegmatite, H27, returned .66lb/ton U3O8 over 5.8 meters. The L zone remains open in all directions while lateral extension and depth extension are unknown. Best interval drill results are posted on the Company website.

The 2007 drilling program confirmed the existence of uranium mineralization in the northeast grid (L, N, X and Y). Findings corroborated the channel sample results of 2006 that showed mineralization to be non-uniformly distributed among the pegmatites and even within each pegmatite. Drill holes revealed that the thickness of the radioactive pegmatites range from one meter to roughly 20 meters along holes and are presented as sub-parallel multiple slabs slightly dipping to the west and separated from each other by sterile rocks. All pegmatites have been intersected at a maximum of 90 vertical meters from surface.

To date, the Doran Showing, located at the south of Doran (drilled in 2006 & Fall 2007) and the North East grid have both been successfully drilled in confirming the presence of a series of sub-parallel uranium bearing pegmatites.

Senior Project Geologist, Michel Proulx M. Sc. (P. Geo and a qualified person, as that term is defined in Canadian Mining National Instrument 43-101 policy) recommended follow up drilling on the Doran Showing (Phase III) as well as an additional 4,000 meters of drilling on the L zone to gain a better understanding of the behaviour of the uranium-bearing pegmatite bodies, the structural geology context and of uranium phase minerals.

The fall 2007 drilling campaign was completed in early November. The program comprised 1,691 metres of drilling in 15 drill holes and was designed to test the area between the North End zone and the Hot Spot zone, the lateral extent of the Hot Spot zone, and to determine the south extension and thickness of the Hill Top pegmatite, all of which are part of the Doran showing.

This campaign was designed to further delineate the Doran Showing where the Company drilled in the summer of 2006. The Doran Showing consists of four distinct pegmatite-bearing structures: The Main Zone, the North End Zone, Dyke Zone and Hot Spot. Results from this drill campaign were announced on February 4, 2008 and five new uraniferous pegmatite zones were n discovered during the Fall 2007 drill program.

In total over 6000 meters have been completed on the Doran property by the Company and Abbastar and the companies are encouraged that the goal of delineating a Rossing type (Namibia) uranium deposit may be realized.

At the time of this report, the Company has not received, from Abbastar Uranium, the 2008 fall work schedule for the Doran property.

Competition

The mineral property exploration business, in general, is intensively competitive and there is not any assurance that even if commercial quantities of ore are discovered, a profitable market will exist for sale of same. Numerous factors beyond our control may affect the marketability of any substances discovered. These factors include market fluctuations, the proximity and capacity of natural resource markets and processing equipment, government regulations, including regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use, importing and exporting of mineral and environmental protection. The exact effect of these factors cannot be accurately predicted, but the combination of these factors may make it difficult for us to receive an adequate return on investment.

We will compete with many companies possessing greater financial resources and technical facilities for the acquisition of mineral concessions, claims, leases and other mineral interests as well as for the recruitment and retention of qualified employees.

The Company is prospecting for uranium in Quebec. It is anticipated that uranium generated power will become more popular in the decades to come as rising oil prices and political strife in the world’s oil producing regions continue. The price of U3O8 (yellow cake) had risen from $7US/ lb in 2005 to $135US/lb. in early 2007. The most recent price for U3O8 is $59US/lb.

The market for diamonds, which the Company’s Smeaton Lake properties are prospective for, is primarily managed by cartel. However, although the CSO (the Central Selling Organization) still distributes and markets the majority of the world's rough production, the introduction of new sources of rough (Australia, Russia, Canada, and parts of Africa) has considerably changed the controlled single market system. Any production of diamonds by the Company would likely have no measurable effect on the world prices.

Regulations

The Company is subject to the various environmental and business regulations of the jurisdictions in which it conducts mineral exploration.

These regulations can be onerous and, in some cases, expensive to comply with. In particular, the Company may be required to expend funds to reclaim or restore land disturbed by mineral exploration.

It is possible that the Company may not be able to afford to comply with various environmental and business regulations in the jurisdictions in which it conducts mineral exploration and would, as a result, have to curtail or cease operations and exploration.

The jurisdictions in which the Company is presently operating are, in the Company’s view, known as jurisdictions which are friendly to mining activity and the Company believes that it can meet applicable regulatory requirements.

Management & Employees

We do not have any employees other than our directors and officers.

Our President and Chief Executive Officer, Gregory F. Kennedy, devotes approximately 75% of his business time to our affairs. We have a management agreement with Mr. Kennedy that was described in the “Related Party Transactions” section of the Company’s 2005 Annual Report and filed on EDGAR on July 1, 2006. This agreement was revised on July 3, 2007 to a fee of $7,500 per month to Mr. Kennedy.

Where necessary, we employ consultants, who in turn employ labourers, to further exploration on our mineral resource properties.

Office Space

We utilize about 700 square feet of office space in Vancouver, British Columbia

Our rent is approximately $1,400 per month ..

4.C Organizational structure

Not applicable

4.D Property, plant and equipment

Disclosure required of an extractive enterprise is contained in part in Item 4, Part B above. As the Company’s properties are not at an advanced stage of exploration, no reserve estimates are made nor as of yet certain what if any reserves will be on the properties.

The Hatchet Lake Uranium Properties (Abandoned)

The Company advanced $320,000CDN to United Uranium Ltd. (formerly United Carina Resources) in option and work commitments. The Company requested and received an extension until July 1^st, 2006 of an additional $300,000 payment to United Carina that was due on February 1^st, 2006 and a further extension to September 15, 2007 was granted by the United Uranium Corp. (formerly United Carina). However, because uranium values encountered in the 2006 and 2007 drilling campaigns were negligible the Company decided to drop the Hatchet Lake properties and the Company did not advance the outstanding $300,000 payable on September 15, 2007 and the project was abandoned.

Black Warrior Project (Abandoned)

In November 2006, with slight anomalous gold showings from an 11-hole drill program, the Company decided to abandon the Black Warrior project. The was no exploration completed in 2006 in advance of the Company’s decision to abandon the Black Warrior project

Smeaton Property: Location and Accessibility

The Smeaton/Forte a la Corne properties were acquired by way of an option agreement between the Company and 101047025 Saskatchewan Ltd.. The original claim blocks consisted of 1087 claims encompassing approximately 1.5 million acres situated in the Smeaton, Forte a la Corne, Candle Lake areas of central Saskatchewan. At the present time, the Company holds approximately 22 of these claims and after repeated requests to have all previous work records of the claims forwarded to the Company, the Company decided to initiate legal proceeding to have the consideration for the claims returned to the Company in exchange for the Company returning the claims to 1010.

There has been no work completed on the claims since the spring of 2006 and no additional monies will be expended on the property until a National Instrument 43-101 compliance of the claims is completed. (See note 10 of the attached financial statements).

There are 16 claims blocks remaining in the Smeaton property and presently the Company is involved in litigation with the vendor as it is the opinion of the Company that CMKM Diamonds Inc. and 101047025 Saskatchewan are in breach of the October 20, 2005 Mineral Option Agreements. These matters are still before the Supreme Court of British Columbia.

The Doran Uranium Property

The Doran Uranium Property consists of 47 contiguous mineral claims (polygons) covering approximately 2473.3 hectares in the Baie Johan Beetz area. The claim block is centered at GPS 548009 E and 5572265 N. The property is located in the southeastern part of Quebec, along the north shore of the Gulf of St. Lawrence, and about 20 kilometers west of Aguanish, approximately 95 kilometers east of Havre St. Pierre. The property extends inland from the Gulf of St Lawrence a distance of approximately 10 kilometers to the north.

The property is situated within the Costebelle Township, NTS map sheet 12 L/08. Access to the property is by daily scheduled flights to Natashquan-Aguanish, then by car from Aguanish to the Pashashibou River and to the southern part of the property.

The topography of the property for the most part is rolling hills having a maximum relief of 100 feet with elevation ranging from sea level to 100 feet. All mineralized areas of interest are located comfortably above sea and river levels. Any heavy equipment could very easily be driven from the road to any of the mineralized zones.

In August 2005 the Company completed a line cutting, trenching and geophysical survey of the property. Although only 25% of the property was surveyed, several drill targets were identified and the Company commenced drilling these targets in the early spring of 2006. Furthermore, the Company contracted the services of Eric Ostensoe, P. Geo, and a qualified person as that term is defined in NI 43-101, to prepare a NI 43-101 compliant technical report on the property. The report was completed before the 2006 drilling and groundwork began.

The initial results of work in the field indicated high ''counts per second`` scintillometer readings, indicative of concentrations of radioactive mineralization. The areas of interest have large surface dimensions and, if they can be shown to have vertical persistence, may have important volumes of potentially mineable materials and thus have the potential, with further work, to become high tonnage deposits with economically attractive amounts of uranium.”

The 2006 exploration activity on the Doran property began in the middle of May 2006. We advanced to the project operator, On Track Explorations Inc., $250,000 to commence drilling on the “Main” and to continue line cutting and trench sampling of the northeast portion of the property and the “North” zone.

On Track Explorations reported to the Company on June 6, 2006, that 16 drill holes on the “M” zone were complete and that drill core samples had been shipped to a qualified assay laboratory in Vancouver. Drill results confirmed sub-surface uranium mineralisation in 14 of 16 holes drilled as well as one drill hole graded .4lb/ton U3O8 over 13 meters in the “Hot Spot” located in the north sector of the Main Zone.

Rock saw channel samples taken in the summer of 2006 revealed elevated readings of uranium from similar samples previously taken from the Main Zone. In conjunction with an airborne magnetic survey of the property and high radioactive levels, it was decided to concentrate on the north sector of the property in the 2007 exploration campaign.

Current State of Exploration

Doran 2007 Drilling

On May 11, 2007, Entourage and Abbastar Holdings announced that Phase One of the second drill program had begun and in all 32 holes were drilled for a total of 3,273.26 meters of diamond drilling and 1158 samples were analyzed representing 2,469.24 linear meters or 75% of the drill-hole length. The results of the Company’s Phase II drilling campaign were reported August 23, 2007. Here is a sample of these results:

Hole H17A (L Anomaly): 16.99m of 0.0435% U3O8 (.87lb/t),
Hole H18 (L Anomaly): 24.1m of 0.033% U3O8 (.66lb/t) (including 16.5m of .73lb/t announced June 28, 2007),
Hole H18A (L Anomaly): 7.25m of 0.023% U3O8 (.46lb/t),
Hole H19 (L Anomaly): 3.52m of 0.039% U3O8 (.78lb/t),
Hole H22 (L Anomaly): 18.44m of 0.024% U3O8 (.48lb/t),
Hole H27 (L Anomaly): 5.8m of 0.33% U3O8 (.66lb/t),
Hole H31 (N Anomaly): 0.66 meters of .29%U3O8 (5.8lb/t)(at surface).

The holes were divided into four zones with particular emphasis on the “L” zone where 18 drill holes were spotted to evaluate the lateral and depth extensions of this zone. The first four drill holes (17,17A, 18, 18A) drilled at different azimuths and plunge angles and set up to test the L19 anomaly, recorded encouraging near surface results including 16.99 meters (55 feet) of .87lb/short ton U3O8 and 24.1 meters (79 feet) of .66lb/ton U3O8; as well, Holes 27 and 27A, intersected three and four pegmatites respectively. The first pegmatite, H27, returned .66lb/ton U3O8 over 5.8 meters. The L zone remains open in all directions while lateral extension and depth extension are unknown. Best interval drill results are posted on the Company website.

To date, the Doran Showing, located at the south of Doran (drilled in 2006) and the North East grid have both been successfully drilled in confirming the presence of a series of sub-parallel uranium bearing pegmatites.

The fall 2007 drilling campaign was completed in early November. This campaign was designed to further delineate the Doran Showing where the Company drilled in the summer of 2006. The Doran Showing consists of four distinct pegmatite-bearing structures: The Main Zone, the North End Zone, Dyke Zone and Hot Spot.

The fall 2007 program comprised 1,691 metres of drilling in 15 drill holes and was designed to test the area between the North End zone and the Hot Spot zone, the lateral extent of the Hot Spot zone, and to determine the south extension and thickness of the Hill Top pegmatite, all of which are part of the Doran showing. The fall 2007 drill campaign achieved similar results to the 2006 campaign and all 15 drill holes encountered uranium mineralization.

Five new uraniferous pegmatite zones were discovered during the fall 2007 drill program. The combined 31 drill holes cover an area of approximately 275 metres long and 200 metres wide.

The Company is satisfied that Abbastar has expended sufficient funds on the property to earn a 20% interest in the Doran claims, as outlined in the Mineral Property Option agreement between the companies. The remaining $75,000 property payment to the Vendor (paid in March 2008) the Company was made and the Doran property is now owned wholly by Entourage (80%) and Abbastar Uranium (20%).

At the time of this report, Abbastar Uranium has not reported the fall 2008 exploration plan to the Company.

Doran Property: Location and Accessibility

The property extends inland from the Gulf of St Lawrence a distance of approximately 10 kilometers to the north. The property is situated within the Costebelle Township, NTS mapsheet 12 L/08. Access to the property is by daily scheduled flights to Natashquan-Aguanish, then by car from Aguanish to the Pashashibou River and to the southern part of the property. Locally this area is known as “Moyenne Cote Nord” or middle coast north of the St. Lawrence Seaway.

The climate around the property area is characterized by long winters, generally extending from late October until mid-April.

The Doran claim block consists of 47 (revised from the original 44 as reported previously) contiguous mineral claims (polygons) covering approximately 2473.3 hectares in the Baie Johan Beetz area. The claim block is centered at GPS 548009 E and 5572265 N. Pertinent claim data is as follows:

Title #	Row	Column	Surface Area
			(ha)
CDC 0048705	05	20	55.01
CDC 0048706	05	21	55.01
CDC 0048707	05	22	55.01
CDC 0048708	05	23	55.01
CDC 0048709	06	20	55.00
CDC 0048710	06	23	55.00
CDC 0048711	07	20	54.99
CDC 0048712	10	24	54.96
CDC 0048713	11	21	54.95
CDC 0048714	11	24	54.95
CDC 0048715	14	22	54.92

CDC 0048716	14	23	54.92
CDC 0048651	07	22	54.99
CDC 0048652	07	23	54.99
CDC 0048653	08	22	54.98
CDC 0048654	08	23	54.98
CDC 0048655	09	22	54.97
CDC 0048656	09	23	54.97
CDC 0048657	10	22	54.06
CDC 0048658	10	23	54.96
CDC 0048659	11	22	54.95
CDC 0048660	11	23	54.95
CDC 0048661	12	22	54.94
CDC 0048662	12	23	54.94
CDC 0048663	13	22	54.93
CDC 0048664	13	23	54.93
CDC 0048665	06	21	55.00
CDC 0048666	06	22	55.00
CDC 0048667	07	21	54.99
CDC 0064114	08	20	54.98
CDC 0064115	08	21	54.98
CDC 0064116	09	20	54.97
CDC 0064117	09	21	54.97
CDC 0064118	10	21	54.96
CDC 0064119	12	21	54.94
CDC 0064120	12	24	54.94
CDC 0064121	13	21	54.93
CDC 0064122	13	24	54.93
CDC 0064123	14	21	54.92
CDC 0064124	14	24	54.92
CDC 0064125	15	21	54.91
CDC 0064126	15	22	54.92
CDC 0064127	15	23	54.92
CDC 0064128	15	24	54.92
CDC 2024598	n/a	n/a	54.92
CDC2024599	n/a	n/a	54.92
CDC 0097498*	n/a	n/a	50.12

* Claim CDC 0097498 provides access to the property and may not be prospective for mineralisation.

ITEM 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

5.A Operating results

Our auditors have issued a going concern opinion. This means that there is substantial doubt that we can continue as an on-going business for the next twelve months unless we obtain additional capital to pay our bills. This is because we have not generated any revenues and no revenues are anticipated until we begin removing and selling minerals. Accordingly, we must raise cash from sources other than the sale of minerals found on the properties. That cash must be raised from other sources. Our only other source for cash at this time is investments by others in Entourage Mining Ltd. We must raise cash to implement our project and stay in business. Even if we raise money, we do not know how long the money will last. It depends upon the amount of exploration we conduct and the cost thereof.

We will attempt to raise additional money through a subsequent private placement, public offering or through loans. If we do not raise all of the money we need, we will have to find alternative sources of funding, like a public offering, a private placement of securities, or loans from our officers or others.

Our exploration program is explained in as much detail as possible in the business section of this registration statement. We are not going to buy or sell any plant or significant equipment during the next twelve months. We will not buy any equipment until we have located a body of minerals and we have determined they are economical to extract from the land.

The Company’s loss (as well as operating expenses) for the period ended December 31, 2007 (‘annual 2007’) totaled $598,783 or $0.01 per share compared to $3,017,828 loss before taxes and $2,973161 net loss or $0.04 per share for the period ended December 31, 2006 (‘annual 2006’). The losses in annual 2007 were much lesser than annual 2006 mainly because the stock based compensation expense during annual 2007 was just $113,074 compared to $2,027,384 during annual 2006. Also, the Company expended only a net total of $61,462 in mineral property acquisition and exploration costs in annual 2007 as compared to $632,122 during annual 2006 because (a) the company received refundable tax credits from Quebec government of $150,723 during annual 2007 and this tax credit recovery has been applied against the exploration costs incurred (b) the Company received $100,000 from Abbastar Holdings Ltd. for optioning the Doran property to them and this payment was applied to the property acquisition costs (c) the Doran property was optioned to Abbastar during early part of 2007 and Abbastar hence was responsible for the expenditures on Doran property. Except for management fees, in general most of the other expenses during annual 2007 were similar in amounts to those incurred in annual 2006. The management fees however, were $195,000 during annual 2007 as compared to $100,500 during annual 2006.

5.B Liquidity and capital resources

As of the date of this report, we have yet to generate any revenues from our business operations.

On February 5, 2004, the Company completed a private placement for 889,500 units, comprised of one common share and one common share purchase warrant, at a price of $0.22 per unit, plus 108,000 flow-through common shares at a price of $0.22 per share, for total consideration of $219,450.

On June 8, 2004, the Company completed a private placement for 698,000 units, comprised of one common share and one common share purchase warrant, at a price of $0.404 (US$0.30) per unit, for total consideration of $282,331.

On December 31, 2004 the Company completed a private placement for 2,815,500 units, comprised of one common shares and one common share purchase warrant, at a price of $0.18 (US$0.15) per share, for total consideration of $510,876. In addition the Company issued 132,000 common shares paid as a finder’s fee in connection with the placement.

On September 22, 2005, the Company completed a private placement of the Company's shares, consisting of 550,000 non-flow-through units, at U.S. $0.15 per unit. Each unit consisted of one common share and one common share purchase warrant entitling the holder to buy one additional share, at U.S. $0.25 per share, for a period of one year. The financing also consisted of 295,000 flow-through shares, at U.S. $0.25 per share (without warrant). The private placement resulted in cash proceeds to the Company of U.S. $82,500.

On October 7, 2005 the Company completed a private placement of 1,275,000 units of the Company's share capital, at U.S. $0.11 per unit. Each unit consisted of one common share and one non-transferable share purchase warrant. Each warrant enables the holder to purchase an additional share, at U.S. $0.25 each, for a period of two years. The Company received proceeds of $140,250 (U.S.) from this private placement.

On November 17, 2005 the Company completed a private placement, consisting of 5,333,334 units of the Company's share capital. Each unit consisted of one common share and one share purchase warrant, each warrant entitling the holder to purchase an additional share for two years, at an exercise price of U.S. $0.25 per share. A finder's fee of 200,000 shares (6%) was paid to a private individual on a portion of the private placement. The grant date fair value of these warrants has been included in share capital on a net basis and accordingly has not been recorded as a separate component of stockholders’ equity.

During the year ended December 31, 2005, 250,000 shares were issued at U.S. $0.15 per share pursuant to exercise of stock options, for proceeds of $44,147, and 50,000 shares were issued at $0.30 per share, for proceeds of $15,000 pursuant to exercise of warrants.

On May 24, 2006, the Company closed a flow through private placement of 340,000 units at US $0.25 for total proceeds of $93,585 (US$85,000) (each unit consisting of one common share and one half share purchase warrant wherein the holder, by offering two half purchase warrants, may purchase an additional share at US $0.30 for two-years). Both the common shares and the share purchase warrants comprising the units are flow-through.

On December 27, 2006 the Company closed a non-brokered flow through private placement of 200,000 units at $0.23 for proceeds of $46,000. Each unit consists of one flow through share and one-half flow through warrant enabling the purchaser to exchange one full flow through warrant for one flow through common share at a price of $0.35 for a period of two years.

During the year ended December 31, 2006, 410,000 shares were issued at U.S. $0.15 per share pursuant to exercise of stock options. Pursuant to exercise of warrants 744.500 shares were issued at $0.30 per share and 955,000 shares were issued at US$0.25 per share.

During the year ended December 31, 2007 the Company received $41,647 from a private placement and $17,267 from options exercise.

On December 31, 2007 the Company had $2,239 in cash compared to $126,611 in cash on December 31, 2006. On December 31, 2007 the Company had a negative working capital position of ($139,410) compared to a positive working capital position of $87,596 on December 31, 2006.

The Company does not need any funds in the near future for the exploration work on its Doran property due to its option agreement with Abbastar. However, the Company would need to raise funds soon to fund its general and administrative costs.

.As of the date of this Annual Report, the Company has a negative working capital position of approximately ($390,000). As a result, it is unable to undertake further property acquisitions for exploration and in order to acquire additional properties the Company will require further financing.

5.C Research and development, patents and licenses, etc.

Our methods of exploration, development and extraction are not unique to our Company but are common in our industry.

We do not rely on patents, technological licenses or intellectual property licenses in our operations.

We did not have any research and development expenditures in the year ended December 31, 2006 or any past years.

5.D Trend information

Our Doran mineral property is prospective for uranium. There are few producers of uranium in the world and the market is dominated by seniors producers Cameco (Canada), Areva (formerly Cogema, France) Energy Resources (Australia), Denison (Canada) and SXR (South Africa). The market for uranium is a homogeneous, integrated commodities market.

The market is not one that is particularly susceptible to the influence of one or more large suppliers or buyers. The world average grade from producing uranium mines is 0.15 per cent U3O8, with spot uranium prices having risen from a cyclical low of US$7.10 (U.S.) per pound in late 2000 to US$135/lb. on June 11, 2007. As of this report Uranium trades at $59 US/lb.

The Smeaton properties are prospective for diamonds. The diamond industry traditionally is controlled by the DeBeers cartel with the exception of “blood diamonds” from conflict areas of the world and small production from non-cartel countries. During the 1990s, discoveries in Northern Canada have made Canada one of the top five producers worldwide. Should our properties become economic producers, our production would likely have virtually no impact on world prices for diamonds.

5.E Off-balance sheet arrangements

The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on the Company’s financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.

5.F Tabular disclosure of contractual obligations

Not Applicable.

ITEM 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES

6.A Directors and senior management

The following is a list of the current directors and senior officers of the Company, their municipalities of residence, their current position with the Company and their principal occupations:

Name of Director	Age	Principal Occupation

Gregory F. Kennedy	58	President of the Company
President, Director
Victoria, BC

Dr. Paul Shatzko	73	Director
Director, Chairman
Langley, BC

Michael B. Hart	59	Director
Director, Secretary
Roberts Creek, BC

Corey Klassen	37	Director
Calgary, AB

Executive Officers:

Name of Officer	Age	Office

Gregory F. Kennedy	58	President, Chief Executive Officer
Michael B. Hart	59	Secretary
Pradeep Varshney	51	Chief Financial Officer

Our directors hold office until our next annual meeting of shareholders and until their successors have been elected and qualified. Our officers are elected by our board of directors at our annual meeting after each of our annual meetings of shareholders and hold office until their death, or until they resign or have been removed from office.

The following describes the business experience of our directors and executive officers, including other directorships held in reporting companies:

Gregory F. Kennedy – Director, President and Chief Executive Office

At our annual general meeting in April 2004, Mr. Kennedy was appointed as President of the Company. Since May 2003, Greg Kennedy has been a director of the Company. In July 2002, Mr. Kennedy became a Director of Abbastar Holings Ltd. (TSX:V-ABA.H.), formerly Fountain House Holdings located in Vancouver, British Columbia. In May 2007 ABA.H changed its name from Abbastar Holdings to Abbastar Uranium, reflecting a change of business and graduation to a Tier II listing on the TSX Venture Exchange. Mr. Kennedy ceased to be a director of Abbastar in August 2006.

Since November 2002, Mr. Kennedy was the President and a Director of Digital Capital.com, Inc., a Delaware corporation, located in Squamish, British Columbia. Digital Capital.com, Inc., was a blank check corporation with no business purpose other than to merge with or acquire another corporation. Digital Capital.com, Inc. did not merge with any entity and the company ceased to exist in 2004.

Due to a medical condition, from December 2000 to July 2001, Mr. Kennedy was not employed and furnished limited consulting services as an independent contractor. From November 1998 to December 2000, Mr. Kennedy was Marketing Director of Titan Trading Analytics Inc. located in Vancouver, British Columbia. Titan Trading is a purveyor of computer software designed for the securities and investment community. From January 1991 to November 1998, Mr. Kennedy was a stockbroker with McDermid St. Lawrence Securities, now Raymond James Canada, located in Vancouver, British Columbia.

Dr. Paul Shatzko – Director and Chairman

Dr. Shatzko is a retired radiologist and self employed businessman; he is a director of several public companies and a director of Entourage Mining Ltd. since July 31, 2004.

Michael B. Hart - Director and Corporate Secretary

Mr. Hart has worked in the financial markets sector with a number of large financial institutions between 1983 and 1990 where he acted as an account executive and financial consultant. From 1990-1995, Mr. Hart fulfilled the responsibilities of business and sales manager within the automotive industry. Subsequent to 1995, Mr. Hart worked with an investment-banking group that was responsible for taking projects from Carinat up to the public markets and has had experience with public companies in the oil and gas industry. Currently, is a member of the Board of Directors of AMG Oil Ltd. Mr. Hart is a Member of the Board and the Corporate Secretary for Entourage Mining Ltd.

Corey Klassen- Director

Mr. Klassen, a Calgary resident, was an economics major at the University of Saskatchewan and predominantly focusing on Business Development Management for major Canadian Financial Institutions and Mortgage Brokering firms for the past 10 years has an extensive background in mortgage and financial lending. To add, Mr. Klassen is also an Instructor for the mandatory Mortgage Brokering Scholastic Courses and an active member in those governing bodies including the Mortgage Brokers Association of British Columbia (MBABC), The Alberta Mortgage Brokers Association (AMBA), and The Canadian Institute of Mortgage Brokers and Lenders(CIMBL). The Company is pleased to be able to draw upon Corey’s financial expertise in future financings.

Pradeep Varshney, Chief Financial Officer

Pradeep Varshney is a Certified General Accountant. In addition, he has an MBA from the University of Western Ontario, and an MS (Chemical Engineering) from the University of New Hampshire, USA. Mr. Varshney has been involved with public companies for the last 14 years. He was formerly the CFO of Mountain Province Diamonds Inc. and Gee-Ten Ventures Inc.

6.B Compensation of Directors

We are required, under applicable securities legislation in Canada, to disclose to our shareholders details of compensation paid to our directors. The following fairly reflects all material information regarding compensation paid to our directors in our fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.

Summary Compensation Table

NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION	YEAR	ANNUAL COMPENSATION			LONG-TERM COMPENSATION
		Salary ($)	Bonus ($)	Other Annual Compensation ($)^1,7	Awards		LTIP payouts ($)	All Other Compensation ($)²
		Salary ($)	Bonus ($)	Other Annual Compensation ($)^1,7	Restricted Stock Awards ($)	Securities Underlying Options/ SAR’s (#)	LTIP payouts ($)	All Other Compensation ($)²
Gregory F. Kennedy, President, Chief Executive Officer & Director	2007	Nil	Nil	75,000³	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil
Michael Hart, Secretary & Director	2007	Nil	Nil	30,000⁴	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil
Paul Shatzko, Chairman & Director	2007	Nil	Nil	36,000⁵	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil
Corey Classen, Director	2006	Nil	Nil	15,000⁶	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil

1 The value of perquisites and benefits, if any, for each Named Executive Officer was less than the lesser of $50,000 and 10% of the total annual salary and bonus
2 For further details, refer to the heading "Related party transactions" below
3 Paid or accrued as a payable for management fees of which $37,628 remained payable as of December 31, 2007
4 Paid or accrued as a payable for management fees of which $29,000 remained payable as of December 31, 2007
5 Paid or accrued as a payable for management fees of which $17,024 remained payable as of December 31, 2007
6 Paid or accrued as a payable for management fees of which $15,000 remained payable as of December 31, 2007
7 Management contracts for Mssrs. Kennedy, Hart, Shatzko and Klassen were revised as of July 2007 (see note 9 of the attached financial statements).

6.C Board practices

The directors hold office until the next annual general meeting of the shareholders at which time they may stand for re-election. We are required to hold an annual general meeting once in every calendar year and not longer than thirteen months from the last annual general meeting.

We are a party to a management contract with Gregory F. Kennedy. No other directors have service contracts with us, nor are they entitled to any termination benefits.

There are no service contracts with the Company for the directors providing for benefits upon termination of their service.

The Company does not have an executive committee.

Our audit committee is comprised of Gregory F. Kennedy, Dr. Paul Shatzko and Michael Hart. Members of the audit committee oversee our accounting and financial reporting process and the audits of our financial statements. The audit committee also receives and addresses complaints regarding accounting, internal controls, and auditing issues. No complaints have been received by us as of the date hereof. Further, the audit committee provides protection for whistle blowers. Again, no whistle blowing issues have presented themselves to us as of the date hereof. The audit committee functions in a collective manner with respect to all issues that come before it.

6.D Employees

We have no employees other than our officers and directors. When we engage in exploration of our resource properties, we use geological consultants and contract labor to support them.

6.E Share ownership

Our directors and officers own beneficially the following shares as of the date of this annual report:

Name	Number of Shares Owned	Percentage of Outstanding Common Shares
Gregory F. Kennedy	0	0%
Paul Shatzko	234,000	<1%
Michael Hart	0	0%
Pradeep Varshney	212,000	<1%

The above percentages are based on the number of common shares issued and outstanding in our capital stock as of the date of this annual report, which are 76,981,894.

The following incentive stock options are outstanding to our directors and officers:

Name	Shares that may be Purchased Upon Exercise of Option	Exercise Price*	Expiry Date
Gregory F. Kennedy	420,000/1,100,000	$0.15/$0.25	February 9, 2009
Michael Hart	50,000/650,000	$0.15/$0.25	February 9, 2009
PradeepVarshney	0/500,000	$0.15/$0.25	February 9, 2009
Paul Shatzko	300,000/1,200,000	$0.15/$0.25	February 9, 2009
Corey Klassen	200,000/500,000	$0.15/$0.25	February 9, 2009

* The Company’s stock option plan was amended February 27, 2007 whereby 1,550,000 options originally priced at $0.30USD and 3,500,000 options originally priced at $0.40USD, were re-priced to $0.25USD.

The Company Stock Option Plan provides for equity participation in the Company by its directors, officers, employees and consultants through the acquisition of common shares pursuant to the grant of options to purchase common shares. The exercise price for options granted under the Stock Option Plan is determined by the closing trading price on the day immediately preceding the date of grant or such other price as the Directors, in their discretion, may determine. The Company has reserved and authorized 7,200,000 shares for issuance under the Stock Option Plan.

Options can be exercisable for a term of up to five years, subject to earlier termination in the event of death or the optionee’s cessation of services to the Company; and options granted under the stock option plan are non-assignable, except by will or the laws of descent and distribution.

ITEM 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

7.A Major shareholders

As used in this section, the term "beneficial ownership" with respect to a security is defined by Regulation 228.403 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as consisting of: (1) any person who, directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship or otherwise has or shares voting power (which includes the power to vote, or to direct the voting of such security) or investment power (which includes the power to dispose, or to direct the disposition of, such security); and (2) any person who, directly or indirectly, creates or uses a trust, proxy, power of attorney, pooling arrangement or any other contract, arrangement or device with the purpose or effect of divesting such person of beneficial ownership of a security or preventing the vesting of such beneficial ownership.

As of the date of this annual report, there are 76,981,894 common shares issued and outstanding in our capital stock. We are authorized to issue an unlimited number of common shares and preferred shares. We have not issued any preferred shares since our incorporation.

As of the date of this annual report, the following persons known to us were the beneficial owner of more than five percent of our outstanding common shares:

Name	Number of Shares	Percentage of Total
101047025 Saskatchewan Ltd	3,888,888	5.2%
CMKM Diamonds Inc. (Shareholders)*	45,000,000	59%

*The Company issued 45,000,000 shares to CMKM Diamonds Inc. in consideration for the Smeaton (30,000,000 shares) and Hatchet Lake (15,000,000), Saskatchewan properties. In the Company’s filings dated November 25, 2005 and titled “Material Change Report”, the terms of the stock issuance are described in section 4 of the Mineral Property Agreements. These agreements state that the 45,000,000 shares are to be distributed to the shareholders of CMKM Diamonds Inc. These shares have not been distributed at the time of this report and there is no indication when or if this distribution may occur. (See note 10 of the attached financial statements)

Of our 103 registered shareholders, 73 are Canadian residents and 30 are United States residents.

Each of our issued common shares entitles the holder to one vote in general meeting. There are no disproportionate or weighted voting privileges.

We are not controlled directly or indirectly by any other corporation or any other foreign government or by any other natural or legal person, severally or jointly.

There are no arrangements the operation of which at a subsequent date may result in a change in our control.

Our trust and transfer agent is Computershare Trust Company of Canada, which is located at 4^th Floor – 510 Burrard Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6C 3B9.

7.B Related party transactions

Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2005:

Amounts payable to related parties as of December 31, 2005 of $53,750.

During the year ended December 31, 2005 the Company incurred $72,500 in management fees to two of its officers.
During the year ended December 31, 2005 the Company incurred $12,854 in management fees to another of its officers (2004 – $1,300).
During the year ended December 31, 2005, a former director and a company controlled by the same former director forgave a debt of $102,327 owing to them by the Company. This amount was recorded as additional paid-in capital.

Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2006:

Amounts payable to related parties as of December 31, 2006 of $29,352 is owed to directors for consulting fees and for expenses paid on behalf of the Company.

During the year ended December 31, 2006 the Company incurred $100,500 in management fees to its officers (Refer to Note 9.)

During the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2007

Amounts payable to related parties as of December 31, 2007 of $119,653) is owing to directors and former directors and to companies controlled by the former directors for consulting fees and for expenses paid on behalf of the Company.

During the year ended December 31, 2007 the Company incurred $195,000 in management fees to its directors and officers.

The above transactions have been in the normal course of operations and, in management’s opinion, undertaken with the same terms and conditions as transactions with unrelated parties.

C. Interests of experts and counsel

Our principal accountants, experts and legal counsel have no interest in our shareholdings. The other items of this instruction are not applicable to Annual Filings on Form 20F.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

8.A Consolidated Statements and other Financial Information

The following financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2007 with comparatives for December 31, 2006, have been audited by an independent auditor, are accompanied by an audit report and are attached and incorporated herein:

(a)	balance sheet;
(b)	income statement;
(c)	statement showing changes in equity;
(d)	cash flow statement;
(e)	related notes and schedules required by the comprehensive body of accounting standards pursuant to which the financial statements are prepared; and
(f)	a note analyzing the changes in each caption of shareholders’ equity presented in the balance sheet.

Incorporated herewith are the comparative financial statements covering the latest two financial years, audited in accordance with a comprehensive body of auditing standards.

Export Sales

The Company had no export sales in its latest financial year ended December 31, 2006 and, as a result, the percentage of export sales for the Company was zero.

Legal Proceedings

The Company, on August 27, 2007, filed a Writ of Summons and Statement of claim against 101047025 Saskatchewan Ltd. and CMKM Diamonds Inc. for breach of contract of the October 20, 2005 Mineral Property Option and Assignment Agreements among the parties. The Company is seeking to have the Supreme Court of British Columbia set aside the aforementioned contracts for failure, on behalf of the defendants, to complete the terms as set out in those contracts. These matters are unresolved at the time of this report and are still pending in the Courts of British Columbia.

Management is not aware of any material proceedings in which any director, any member of management or any of the Company’s affiliates are a party adverse to, or have a material interest adverse to, the Company.

Dividend Policy

The Company has not paid dividends on the common shares in any of its last five fiscal years. The directors of the Company will determine if and when dividends should be declared and paid in the future based on the Company’s financial position at the relevant time. All of the common shares of the Company are entitled to an equal share in any dividends declared and paid.

8.B Significant Changes

There have been no significant changes, as that term is defined in the rules and policies governing the use of the Form 20F, since the date of the audited financial statements included herein.

ITEM 9. THE OFFER AND LISTING

A. Offer and listing details

Our shares commenced trading on February 2, 2004 on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board in the United States under the symbol ETGMF.

The following table sets forth the high and low closing prices in US funds of our common shares traded:

Annual Periods	High	Low
February 2, 2004 to December 31, 2004	$0.50	$0.083
January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005	$0.70	$0.10
January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006	$0.54	$0.17
January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007	$0.35	$0.05

Quarterly Periods

	High	Low
January 2006 to March 31, 2006	$0.54	$0.29
April 1, 2006 to June 30, 2006	$0.43	$0.20
July 1, 2006 to September 30, 2006	$0.35	$0.20
October 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006	$0.35	$0.17
January 1, 2007 to March 31, 2007	$0.35	$0.17
April 1, 2007 to June 30, 2007	$0.28	$0.19
July 1, 2007 to September 30, 2007	$0.20	$0.09
October 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007	$0.12	$0.02
January 1, 2008 to March 31, 2008	$0.08	$0.02

Monthly Periods

	High	Low
January 2007	$0.25	$0.17
February 2007	$0.27	$0.18
March 2007	$0.35	$0.20
April 2007	$0.26	$0.19
May 2007	$0.24	$0.17
June 2007	$0.28	$0.19
July 2007	$0.20	$0.10
August 2007	$0.17	$0.09
September 2007	$0.12	$0.09
October 2007	$0.11	$0.08
November 2007	$0.12	$0.09
December 2007	$0.09	$0.02
January 2008	$0.08	$0.05
February 2008	$0.07	$0.02
March 2008	$0.04	$0.02
April 2008	$0.12	$0.03
May 2008	$0.10	$0.04

9.B Plan of distribution

Not applicable

9.C Markets

Our shares commenced trading on February 2^nd, 2004 on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board in the United States under the symbol ETGMF, however, a lack of liquidity may make it difficult to resell shares.

There are no plans, proposals, arrangements or understandings with any person with regard to the development of a trading market in any of our securities.

9.D Selling shareholders

Not applicable

9.E Dilution

Not applicable

9.F Expenses of the issue

Not applicable

ITEM 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

10.A Share Capital

Not Applicable.

10.B Memorandum and articles of association

We have no bylaws under British Columbia law. We have Articles of Incorporation.

This information has been provided in the Company’s Annual Report of Form 20-F filed in June 2006 on the SEC’s Edgar site and is incorporated by reference herein.

10.C Material contracts

There are no material contracts except as discussed in this Annual Report and except as entered into in the ordinary course of business. The following material contracts referred to in this Annual Report may be inspected at our offices during normal business hours.

	1.	Agreement dated March 15, 2005 between Fayz Yacoub and the Company, and amended March 6, 2007 whereby the Company can acquire a 100% interest in the Doran Uranium Property (referenced by way of the Company’s 20-F filing dated July 1, 2005), and

	2.	Agreement dated April 21, 2005 between the Company and CMKM Diamonds, Inc. whereby CMKM may acquire up to a 10% interest in the Company’s Black Warrior Project (referenced by way of the Company’s 20-F filing dated July 1, 2005), and

	3.	Assignment Agreement dated October 20, 2005 between the Company and CMKM Diamonds Inc., whereby the Company assumed all of the rights of CMKM, if any, in the Hatchet Lake Property (referenced by way of the Company’s 6-K filing dated November 23, 2005), and

	4.	Agreement dated October 20, 2005 between the Company and 101047025 Saskatchewan Ltd., whereby the Company may acquire up to 80% interest in the Smeaton/Forte a la Corne properties (referenced by way of the Company’s 6-K filing dated November 25, 2005).

	5.	Agreement dated February 13, 2007 between the Company and Abbastar Uranium Corp. (formerly Abbastar Holding Ltd.) whereby Abbastar may earn up to 70% interest in the Doran uranium prospect in Costebelle Township, Quebec. (referenced by way of form 6-k on February 14, 2007)

10.D Exchange Controls

There is no law or governmental decree or regulation in Canada that restricts the export or import of capital, or affects the remittance of dividends, interest or other payments to a non-resident holder of common shares, other than withholding tax requirements. See "Item 10.ETaxation".

There is no limitation imposed by Canadian law or by our constituent documents on the right of a non-resident to hold or vote common shares, other than are provided in the Investment Canada Act (Canada). The following summarizes the principal features of the Investment Canada Act (Canada).

The Investment Canada Act (Canada) requires certain "non-Canadian" individuals, governments, corporation or other entities who wish to acquire a "Canadian business" (as defined in the Investment Canada Act), or establish a "new Canadian business" (as defined in the Investment Canada Act) to file either a notification or an application for review with a governmental agency known as "Investment Canada". The Investment Canada Act requires that certain acquisition of control of Canadian business by a "non-Canadian" must be reviewed and approved by the Minister responsible for the Investment Canada Act on the basis that the Minister is satisfied that the acquisition is "likely to be of net benefit to Canada", having regard to criteria set forth in the Investment Canada Act. Only acquisitions of control are reviewable under the Investment Canada Act; however, the Investment Canada Act provides detailed rules for the determination of whether control has been acquired and, pursuant to those rules, the acquisition of one-third or more of the voting shares of a corporation may, in some circumstances, be considered to constitute an acquisition of control. Certain reviewable acquisitions of control may not be implemented before being approved by the Minister; if the Minister does not ultimately approve a reviewable acquisition, which has been completed, the acquired Canadian business must be divested. Failure to comply with the review provisions of the Investment Canada Act could result in, amongst other things, an injunction or a court order directing disposition of assets of shares.

10.E Taxation

Certain US Federal Income Tax Consequences

The following is a general discussion of the material United States Federal income tax law for U.S. holders that hold such common shares as a capital asset, as defined under United States Federal income tax law and is limited to discussion of U.S. Holders that own less than 10% of the common stock. This discussion does not address all potentially relevant Federal income tax matters and it does not address consequences peculiar to persons subject to special provisions of Federal income tax law, such as those described below as excluded from the definition of a U.S. Holder. In addition, this discussion does not cover any state, local or foreign tax consequences.

The following discussion is based upon the sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended to the date hereof (the "Code"), Treasury Regulations, published Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") rulings, published administrative positions of the IRS and court decisions that are currently applicable, any or all of which could be materially and adversely changed, possibly on a retroactive basis, at any time. In addition, this discussion does not consider the potential effects, both adverse and beneficial, of any future legislation that, if enacted, could be applied, possibly on a retroactive basis, at any time. The following discussion is for general information only and it is not intended to be, nor should it be construed to be, legal or tax advice to any holder or prospective holder of common shares of the Company and no opinion or representation with respect to the United States Federal income tax consequences to any such holder or prospective holder is made. Accordingly, holders and prospective holders of common shares of the Company should consult their own tax advisors about the Federal, state, local, and foreign tax consequences of purchasing, owning and disposing of common shares of the Company.

U.S. Holders

As used herein, a "U.S. Holder" is a holder of common shares of the Company who or which is a citizen or individual resident (or is treated as a citizen or individual resident) of the United States for federal income tax purposes, a corporation or partnership created or organized (or treated as created or organized for federal income tax purposes) in the United States, including only the States and District of Columbia, or under the law of the United States or any State or Territory or any political subdivision thereof, or a trust or estate the income of which is includable in its gross income for federal income tax purposes without regard to its source, if, (i) a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust and (ii) one or more United States trustees have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust.

For purposes of this discussion, a U.S. Holder does not include persons subject to special provisions of Federal income tax law, such as tax-exempt organizations, qualified retirement plans, financial institutions, insurance

companies, real estate investment trusts, regulated investment companies, broker-dealers and Holders who acquired their stock through the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation.

Distributions on common shares of the Company

U.S. Holders receiving dividend distributions (including constructive dividends) with respect to common shares of the Company are required to include in gross income for United States Federal income tax purposes the gross amount of such distributions to the extent that the Company has current or accumulated earnings and profits, without reduction for any Canadian income tax withheld from such distributions. Such Canadian tax withheld may be credited, subject to certain limitations, against the U.S. Holder's United States Federal income tax liability or, alternatively, may be deducted in computing the U.S. Holder's United States Federal taxable income by those who itemize deductions. (See more detailed discussion at "Foreign Tax Credit" below). To the extent that distributions exceed current or accumulated earnings and profits of the Company, they will be treated first as a return of capital up to the U.S. Holder's adjusted basis in the common shares and thereafter as gain from the sale or exchange of the common shares. Preferential tax rates for long-term capital gains are applicable to a U.S. Holder that is an individual, estate or trust. There are currently no preferential tax rates for long-term capital gains for a U.S. Holder that is a corporation.

Dividends paid on the common shares of the Company will not generally be eligible for the dividends received deduction provided to corporations receiving dividends from certain United States corporations. A U.S. Holder which is a corporation may, under certain circumstances, be entitled to a 70% deduction of the United States source portion of dividends received from the Company if such U.S. Holder owns shares representing at least 10% of the voting power and value of the Company. The availability of this deduction is subject to several complex limitations, which are beyond the scope of this discussion.

Foreign Tax Credit

A U.S. Holder who pays (or has withheld from distributions) Canadian income tax with respect to the ownership of common shares of the Company may be entitled, at the option of the U.S. Holder, to either a deduction or a tax credit for such foreign tax paid or withheld. Generally, it will be more advantageous to claim a credit because a credit reduces United States Federal income taxes on a dollar-for-dollar basis, while a deduction merely reduces the taxpayer's income subject to tax. This election is made on a year-by-year basis and applies to all foreign taxes paid by (or withheld from) the U.S. Holder during that year. There are significant and complex limitations, which apply to the credit, among which is the general limitation that the credit cannot exceed the proportionate shares of the U.S. Holder's United States income tax liability that the U.S. Holder's foreign source income bears to his or its worldwide taxable income. In the determination of the application of this limitation, the various items of income and deduction must be classified into foreign and domestic sources. Complex rules govern this classification process. There are further limitations on the foreign tax credit for certain types of income such as "passive income," "high withholding tax interest," "financial services income," "shipping income" and certain other classifications of income. The availability of the foreign tax credit and the application of the limitations on the credit are fact specific and holders and prospective holders of common shares of the Company should consult their own tax advisors regarding their individual circumstances.

Disposition of common shares of the Company

A U.S. Holder will recognize gain or loss upon the sale of common shares of the Company equal to the difference, if any, between the amount of cash plus the fair market value of any property received, and the Holder's tax basis in the common shares of the Company. This gain or loss will be capital gain or loss if the common shares are a capital asset in the hands of the U.S. Holder. Any capital gain will be a short-term or long-term capital gain or loss depending upon the holding period of the U.S. Holder. Gains and losses are netted and combined according to special rules in arriving at the overall capital gain or loss for a particular tax year. Deductions for net capital losses are subject to significant limitations. For U.S. Holders that are individuals, any unused portion of such net capital loss may be carried over to be used in later tax years until such net capital loss is thereby exhausted. For U.S. Holders which are corporations (other than corporations subject to Subchapter S of the Code), an unused net capital loss may be carried back three years from the loss year and carried forward five years from the loss year to be offset against capital gains until such net capital loss is thereby exhausted.

Certain Canadian Federal Income Tax Consequences

The following discussion summarizes the principal Canadian federal income tax considerations generally applicable to a person who owns one or more common shares of the Company (the "Shareholder"), and who at all material times for the purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the "Canadian Act") deals at arm's length with the Company, holds all common shares solely as capital property, is a non-resident of Canada, and does not, and is not deemed to, use or hold any Common share in or in the course of carrying on business in Canada. It is assumed that the common shares will at all material times be listed on a stock exchange that is prescribed for the purposes of the Canadian Act.

This summary is based on the current provisions of the Canadian Act, including the regulations thereunder, and the Canada-United States Income Tax Convention (1980) (the "Treaty") as amended. This summary takes into account all specific proposals to amend the Canadian Act and the regulations thereunder publicly announced by the government of Canada to the date hereof and the Company's understanding of the current published administrative and assessing practices of Canada Customs and Revenue Agency. It is assumed that all such amendments will be enacted substantially as currently proposed, and that there will be no other material change to any such law or practice, although no assurances can be given in these respects. Except to the extent otherwise expressly set out herein, this summary does not take into account any provincial, territorial or foreign income tax law or treaty.

This summary is not, and is not to be construed as, tax advice to any particular Shareholder. Each prospective and current Shareholder is urged to obtain independent advice as to the Canadian income tax consequences of an investment in common shares applicable to the Shareholder's particular circumstances.

A Shareholder generally will not be subject to tax pursuant to the Canadian Act on any capital gain realized by the Shareholder on a disposition of a Common share unless the Common share constitutes "taxable Canadian property" to the Shareholder for purposes of the Canadian Act and the Shareholder is not eligible for relief pursuant to an applicable bilateral tax treaty. A Common share that is disposed of by a Shareholder will not constitute taxable Canadian property of the Shareholder provided that the Common share is listed on a stock exchange that is prescribed for the purposes of the Canadian Act (the Toronto Stock Exchange is so prescribed), and that neither the Shareholder, nor one or more persons with whom the Shareholder did not deal at arm's length, alone or together at any time in the five years immediately preceding the disposition owned, or owned any right to acquire, 25% or more of the issued shares of any class of the capital stock of the Company. In addition, the Treaty generally will exempt a Shareholder who is a resident of the United States for the purposes of the Treaty, and who would otherwise be liable to pay Canadian income tax in respect of any capital gain realized by the Shareholder on the disposition of a Common share, from such liability provided that the value of the Common share is not derived principally from real property (including resource property) situated in Canada or that the Shareholder does not have, and has not had within the 12-month period preceding the disposition, a "permanent establishment" or "fixed base," as those terms are defined for the purposes of the Treaty, available to the Shareholder in Canada. The Treaty may not be available to a non-resident Shareholder that is a U.S. LLC, which is not subject to tax in the U.S. Any dividend on a Common share, including a stock dividend, paid or credited, or deemed to be paid or credited, by the Company to a Shareholder will be subject to Canadian withholding tax at the rate of 25% on the gross amount of the dividend, or such lesser rate as may be available under an applicable income tax treaty. Pursuant to the Treaty, the rate of withholding tax applicable to a dividend paid on a Common share to a Shareholder who is a resident of the United States for the purposes of the Treaty will be reduced to 5% if the beneficial owner of the dividend is a company that owns at least 10% of the voting stock of the Company, and in any other case will be reduced to 15%, of the gross amount of the dividend. It is Canada Customs and Revenue Agency`s position that the Treaty reductions are not available to a Shareholder that is a "limited liability company" resident in the United States. The Company will be required to withhold any such tax from the dividend, and remit the tax directly to Canada Customs and Revenue Agency for the account of the Shareholder.

ALL PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS ARE URGED TO CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS WITH RESPECT TO THE SPECIFIC TAX CONSEQUENCES OF PURCHASING THE COMMON SHARES.

10.F Dividends and paying agents

Not Applicable to Annual Reports on Form 20F.

10.G Statement by experts

Not Applicable to Annual Reports on Form 20F.

10.H Documents on Display

The documents concerning the Company which are referred to in this Report on Form 20F are located at its principal executive offices at the address on the face page of this Report.

10.I Subsidiary information

We have one subsidiary, Entourage USA Inc. located 711 S. Carson Street, Suite 4, Carson City, NV 89701At present the subsidiary company is inactive.

ITEM 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk

The Company does not have market portfolios and does not engage in trading risk sensitive instruments or financial instruments. The Company is an extractive enterprise.

ITEM 12. Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies

The Company has had no material defaults in payment of principal, interest or sinking or purchase fund installments. The Company is an extractive enterprise.

ITEM 14. Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable

ITEM 15. Controls and Procedures

1. Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company's Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure based closely on the definition of "disclosure controls and procedures" in Rule 13a-15(e) The Company's disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide a reasonable level of assurance of reaching the Company's desired disclosure control objectives. In the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and manage ment necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. The Company's certifying officer has concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are ineffective in reaching that level of assurance.

2. Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as required by Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Section 404 A. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Company’s financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

As of December 31, 2007, management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) and SEC guidance on conducting such assessments. Based on that evaluation, they concluded that, during the period covered by this report, such internal controls and procedures were not effective to detect the inappropriate application of US GAAP rules as more fully described below. This was due to deficiencies that existed in the design or operation of our internal control over financial reporting that adversely affected our internal controls and that may be considered to be material weaknesses.

The matters involving internal controls and procedures that the Company’s management considered to be material weaknesses under COSO and SEC rules were: (1) lack of a functioning audit committee and lack of a majority of independent directors on the Company's board of directors, resulting in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures; (2) inadequate segregation of duties consistent with control objectives; (3) insufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting with respect to the requirements and application of US GAAP and SEC disclosure requirements; and (4) ineffective controls over period end financial disclosure and reporting processes. The aforementioned material weaknesses were identified by the Company's Chief Financial Officer in connection with the preparation of our financial statements as of December 31, 2007 and communicated the matters to our management and board of directors.

Management believes that the material weaknesses set forth in items (2), (3) and (4) above did not have an affect on the Company's financial results. However, management believes that the lack of a functioning audit committee and lack of a majority of independent directors on the Company's board of directors, resulting in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures, could impact the Company's financial statements for the future years.

We are committed to improving our financial organization. As part of this commitment, we hope to create a position to segregate duties consistent with control objectives and will increase our personnel resources and technical accounting expertise within the accounting function when funds are available to the Company: i) Appointing one or more outside directors to our board of directors who shall be appointed to the audit committee of the Company resulting in a fully functioning audit committee who will undertake the oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures; and ii) Preparing and implementing sufficient written policies and checklists which will set forth procedures for accounting and financial reporting with respect to the requirements and application of US GAAP and SEC disclosure requirements.

Management believes that the appointment of one or more independent directors, who shall be appointed to a fully functioning audit committee, will remedy the lack of a functioning audit committee and a lack of a majority of outside directors on the Company's Board. In addition, management believes that preparing and implementing sufficient written policies and checklists will remedy the following material weaknesses (i) insufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting with respect to the requirements and application of US GAAP and SEC disclosure requirements; and (ii) ineffective controls over period end financial close and reporting processes. Further, management believes that the hiring of additional personnel who have the technical expertise and knowledge will result in proper segregation of duties and provide more checks and balances within the department. Additional personnel will also provide the cross training needed to support the Company if personnel turn over issues within the department occur. This coupled with the appointment of additional outside directors will greatly decrease any control and procedure issues the company may encounter in the future.

Any effort to increase the size of the Board of Directors, appoint independent directors or personnel is conditional upon the Company to raise additional capital.

We will continue to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of our internal controls and procedures and our internal controls over financial reporting on an ongoing basis and are committed to taking further action and implementing additional enhancements or improvements, as necessary and as funds allow.

15.D Changes in Internal Control over financial reporting

During the year ended December 31, 2008, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

15.T Controls and Procedures

Not applicable to non-accelerated filers.

ITEM 16. [reserved]

16A. Audit Committee Financial Expert

We do not have an audit committee financial expert serving on our audit committee.

16.B Code of Ethics

The Company has a written Code of Ethics that is attached to this report as an attachment.

16.C Principal Accountant Fees and Services

(a) Audit Fees

The aggregate fees billed for each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the Company’s principal accountant(s) for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements, together with services that are normally provided by the principal accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements were $24,536.40 for the year ending December 31, 2007. For year 2006 the amount was $$22,352.00.

(b) Audit-Related Fees

The aggregate fees billed for each of the last two fiscal years for assurance and related services by the principal accountant that were reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements but are not reported under paragraph (a) of this Item were $1,500 for year 2006 and year 2005.

(c) Tax Fees

The aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning & tax return preparation were $6,500 for 2006 & $6,500 for 2007.

(d) All Other Fees

The aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for products and services provided by the principal accountant other than services disclosed in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this Item were $nil in the year ending December 31, 2006 and $nil in the year ending December 31, 2005.

16.D Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees

The disclosure required under Exchange Act Rule 10A-3(d) is not applicable to the Company.

16.E Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

The Company made no issuer repurchases, including any made pursuant to a publicly announced plan or program or made pursuant to a plan or program that was not announced publicly, in the last two fiscal years. The Company made no open market issuer repurchases.

PART III

ITEM 17. Financial Statements

Our financial statements are attached hereto immediately before the signatures section. Our audited financial statements include:

our balance sheets as at December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006;
statements of loss and deficit for the periods ended December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006;
statements of cash flows for the periods ended December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006; and
notes to the financial statements.

ENTOURAGE MINING LTD.
(An Exploration Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2007 AND 2006
(Stated in Canadian Dollars)

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of Entourage Mining Ltd.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Entourage Mining Ltd (the “Company”) (an exploration stage company) as at December 31, 2007 and 2006 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31 2007 and 2006 and for the cumulative period from June 16, 1995 (inception) through December 31, 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. The consolidated financial statements of Entourage Mining Ltd. for the period from January 16, 1995 (inception) to December 31, 2003 were reported upon by other auditors whose unqualified report dated May 6, 2004 included an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements of Entourage Mining Ltd. for the period from January 16, 1995 (inception) to De cember 31, 2003 reflect a total net loss of $958,486 of the related cumulative totals. The other auditor’s reports have been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to amounts included for such prior periods, is based solely on the reports of such other auditors.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of another auditor, these consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as at December 31, 2007 and 2006 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 and for the period from June 16, 1995 (inception) to December 31, 2007, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, to date the Company has reported losses since inception from operations and requires additional funds to meet its obligations and fund the costs of its operations. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in this regard are described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

DALE MATHESON CARR-HILTON LABONTE LLP
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

Vancouver, Canada
April 10, 2008

ENTOURAGE MINING LTD.
(An Exploration Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Stated in Canadian Dollars)

		DECEMBER 31
		2007			2006

ASSETS

Current
Cash	$	2,239		$	126,611
Advances and prepaid expenses		1,084			27,994
Goods and services and Quebec sales tax recoverable		16,484			35,442
		19,807			190,047
Equipment (Note 3)		2,763			3,716

	$	22,570		$	193,763

LIABILITIES

Current
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	39,564		$	73,099
Due to related parties (Note 6)		119,653			29,352
		159,217			102,451

CONTINGENCIES AND COMMITMENTS (Notes 1, 4, 9 and 10)

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)

Capital Stock (Note 5)
Authorized:
100,000,000 common voting shares without par value
Issued:
76,981,894 common voting shares (2006 – 76,015,227)		12,383,714			12,125,964

Additional paid in capital		3,035,356			2,922,282

Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage		(15,555,717	)		(14,956,934	)
		(136,647	)		91,312

	$	22,570		$	193,763

Subsequent event (Note 4b)

Approved by the Board of Directors:

“Gregory F. Kennedy”

“Paul Shatzko”

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

ENTOURAGE MINING LTD.
(An Exploration Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Stated in Canadian Dollars)

	YEARS ENDED				June 16, 1995
					(inception)
	DECEMBER 31				To
					December 31,
	2007		2006		2007
	$		$		$
Expenses
Amortization	953		1,303		5,081
Consulting	58,594		70,166		208,235
Consulting – stock based compensation (Note 5)	101,774		2,027,384		2,713,558
Financing fee – stock based compensation (Note 5)	11,300		-		11,300
Interest expense	1,119		1,139		12,949
Management fees	195,000		100,500		647,154
Mineral property costs (Notes 4 and 11)	61,462		632,122		10,990,909
Office and sundry	56,532		66,262		449,011
Professional fees	34,568		53,359		331,266
Travel and promotion	77,481		65,593		253,416

Loss Before Taxes	(598,783	)	(3,017,828	)	(15,622,879	)

Deferred tax recovery (Note 7)	-		44,667		67,162

Net Loss	(598,783	)	(2,973,161	)	(15,555,717	)


Loss Per Share, basic and diluted	(0.01	)	(0.04	)

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding,
basic and diluted	76,751,437		74,380,281

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

ENTOURAGE MINING LTD.
(An Exploration Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Stated in Canadian Dollars)

							DEFICIT
							ACCUMULATED
	NUMBER				OBLIGATION	ADDITIONAL	DURING
	OF				TO ISSUE	PAID-IN	EXPLORATION
	SHARES		AMOUNT		SHARES	CAPITAL	STAGE		TOTAL
			$		$	$	$		$

Share issued for cash	5		1		-	-	-		1
Loss for the period	-		-		-	-	(38,624	)	(38,624	)
Balance, December 31, 1995	5		1		-	-	(38,624	)	(38,623	)
Shares issued for cash	9,130,000		276,500		-	-	-		276,500
Loss for the year	-		-		-	-	(210,592	)	(210,592	)
Balance, December 31,1996	9,130,005		276,501		-	-	(249,216	)	27,285
Loss for the year	-		-		-	-	(74,529	)	(74,529	)
Balance, December 31, 1997	9,130,005		276,501		-	-	(323,745	)	(47,244	)
Loss for the year	-		-		-	-	(60,148	)	(60,148	)
Balance, December 31, 1998	9,130,005		276,501		-	-	(383,893	)	(107,392	)
Loss for the year	-		-		-	-	(70,046	)	(70,046	)
Balance, December 31, 1999	9,130,005		276,501		-	-	(453,939	)	(177,438	)
Loss for the year	-		-		-	-	(66,855	)	(66,855	)
Balance, December 31, 2000	9,130,005		276,501		-	-	(520,794	)	(244,293	)
Loss for the year	-		-		-	-	(58,749	)	(58,749	)
Balance, December 31, 2001	9,130,005		276,501		-	-	(579,543	)	(303,042	)
Forgiveness of amounts due to related
party	-		-		-	200,671	-		200,671
Loss for the year	-		-		-	-	(59,428	)	(59,428	)
Balance, December 31, 2002	9,130,005		276,501		-	200,671	(638,971	)	(161,799	)
April 25, 2003 – shares issued for
mineral property	6,000,000		60,000		-	-	-		60,000
Loss for the year	-		-		-	-	(319,515	)	(319,515	)
Balance, December 31, 2003	15,130,005		336,501		-	200,671	(958,486	)	(421,314	)
February 5, 2004 – shares issued for
cash at $0.22 per share	997,500		219,450		-	-	-		219,450
February 5, 2004 – deferred tax
recovery on 108,000 flow-through	-		(2,376	)	-	-	-		(2,376	)
shares
June 8, 2004 – shares issued for cash
at $0.404 per share	698,000		282,331		-	-	-		282,331
August 24, 2004 – stock options
exercised at $0.33 per share	100,000		32,983		-	-	-		32,983
December 31, 2004 – shares issued
for cash at $0.18 per share
inclusive of 132,500 shares as
finders’ fees	2,948,000		510,876		-	-	-		510,876
August 24, 2004 – shares issued for
mineral property database at $0.39
per share	150,000		58,788		-	-	-		58,788
September 24, 2004 – shares returned
on cancellation of escrow	(3,750,000	)	(7,500	)	-	7,500	-		-
Stock based compensation	-		-		-	421,000	-		421,000
Loss for the year	-		-		-	-	(956,446	)	(956,466	)
Balance, December 31, 2004	16,273,505		1,431,053		-	629,171	(1,914,932	)	145,292

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

ENTOURAGE MINING LTD.
(An Exploration Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Stated in Canadian Dollars)

							DEFICIT
							ACCUMULATED
	NUMBER			OBLIGATION		ADDITIONAL	DURING
	OF			TO ISSUE		PAID-IN	EXPLORATION
	SHARES	AMOUNT		SHARES		CAPITAL	STAGE		TOTAL
		$		$		$	$		$

Balance, December 31, 2004,
carried forward	16,273,505	1,431,053		-		629,171	(1,914,932	)	145,292
January 6, 2005, refund for
overpayment in 2004 private				-
placement	-	(3,000	)			-	-		(3,000	)
March 21, 2005, shares issued for
property acquisition at
U.S. $0.30 per share	125,000	45,604		-		-	-		45,604
Sept. 22, 2005, flow-through shares
issued at $0.20 per share	295,000	59,000		-		-	-		59,000
September, 2005, deferred tax
recovery on 295,000 flow-through
shares	-	(20,119	)			-	-		(20,119	)
Sept. 22, 2005, units issued at
U.S. $0.15 per unit	550,000	97,152		-		-	-		97,152
Oct. 7, 2005, units issued at
U.S. $0.11 per unit	1,275,000	165,154		-		-	-		165,154
Oct.-Dec 2005, shares issued on
exercise of stock options at				-
U.S. $0.15 per share	250,000	44,147				-	-		44,147
Oct. 2005, shares issued on exercise
of warrants at $0.30 per share	50,000	15,000		-		-	-		15,000
Nov. 17, 2005, units issued at
U.S. $0.15 per share inclusive of
200,000 shares finders’ fees	5,533,334	944,800		-		-	-		944,800
Stock based compensation	-	-		-		163,400	-		163,400
Forgiveness of amounts due to
related party	-	-		-		102,327	-		102,327
Obligation to issue shares (Note 4)	-	-		8,638,667			-		8,638,667
Loss for the year		-		-		-	(10,068,841	)	(10,068,841	)
Balance, December 31, 2005	24,351,839	2,778,791		8,638,667		894,898	(11,983,773	)	328,583
January 3, 2006, shares issued for
property acquisition at a deemed
price of US $0.15 per share	48,888,888	8,638,667		(8,638,667	)	-	-		-
Jan.-Aug. 2006, shares issued on
exercise of stock options at
US $0.15 per share	410,000	69,317		-		-	-		69,317
February 2006, shares issued on
exercise of warrants at $0.30
per share	744,500	223,350		-		-	-		223,350
March 7, 2006, shares issued for
property acquisition at
U.S. $0.36 per share	125,000	51,772		-		-	-		51,772
May 24, 2006, shares issued for
flow-through private placement
at US $0.25 per share	340,000	93,585		-		-	-		93,585
Aug.-Nov. 2006, shares issued on
exercise of warrants at US $0.25
per share	955,000	269,149		-		-	-		269,149
Dec. 2006, shares issued for flow-
through private placement
at $0.23 per share	200,000	46,000		-		-	-		46,000
Stock based compensation	-	-		-		2,027,384	-		2,027,384
Deferred tax recovery on 540,000
flow-through shares	-	(44,667	)			-	-		(44,667	)

Loss for the year	-	-		-		-	(2,973,161	)	(2,973,161	)
Balance, December 31, 2006	76,015,227	12,125,964		-		2,922,282	(14,956,934	)	91,312

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

ENTOURAGE MINING LTD.
(An Exploration Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Stated in Canadian Dollars)

					DEFICIT
					ACCUMULATED
	NUMBER		OBLIGATION	ADDITIONAL	DURING
	OF		TO ISSUE	PAID-IN	EXPLORATION
	SHARES	AMOUNT	SHARES	CAPITAL	STAGE		TOTAL
		$	$	$	$		$

Balance, December 31, 2006,
carried forward	76,015,227	12,125,964	-	2,922,282	(14,956,934	)	91,312
March 12, 2007, shares issued for
Property option payment at
US$0.30 per share deemed price	500,000	175,530	-	-	-		175,530
March 27, 2007, shares issued for
options exercise at US$0.15 per share	50,000	8,760	-	-	-		8,760
March 31, 2007, shares issued for
Pvt. Placement at US$0.15per share
net of finder’s fee of $4,537	266,667	41,647	-	-	-		41,647
Stock based compensation	-	-	-	113,074	-		113,074
April 3, 2007, shares issued for
Options exercise at US$0.15 per share	50,000	8,507	-	-	-		8,507
June 18, 2007, shares issued for debt			-
at US$0.20 per share	100,000	23,306		-	-		23,306
Loss for the year	-	-	-	-	(598,783	)	(598,783	)
Balance, December 31, 2007	76,981,894	12,383,714	-	3,035,356	(15,555,717	)	(136,647	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

ENTOURAGE MINING LTD.
(An Exploration Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Stated in Canadian Dollars)

					June 16, 1995
	YEARS ENDED				(inception)
	DECEMBER 31				to
					December 31,
	2007		2006		2007
	$		$		$
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss	(598,783	)	(2,973,161	)	(15,555,717	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash from
operating activities:
Amortization	953		1,303		5,081
Stock based compensation	113,074		2,027,384		2,724,858
Shares issued for mineral property
acquisition	175,530		51,772		9,030,361
Shares issued for debt	23,306		-		23,306
Deferred tax recovery	-		(44,667	)	(67,162	)
Changes in non-cash operating working capital items:
Advances and prepaid expenses	26,910		(23,910	)	(1,084	)
Goods and services & Quebec sales tax recoverable	18,958		(10,091	)	(16,484	)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	(33,535	)	(58,604	)	39,564
Due to related parties	90,301		(24,398	)	422,651
NET CASH FLOWS USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES	(183,286	)	(1,054,372	)	(3,394,626	)

CASH FLOWS USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Equipment	-		-		(7,845	)
NET CASH FLOWS USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES	-		-		(7,845	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net proceeds on sale of common stock	58,914		701,402		3,404,710
NET CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES	58,914		701,402		3,404,710

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH	(124,372	)	(352,970	)	2,239
CASH, BEGINNING	126,611		479,581		-

CASH, END	2,239		126,611		2,239

SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION AND NON-CASH INVESTING
AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES (Note 8)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

ENTOURAGE MINING LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2007 AND 2006

(Stated in Canadian Dollars)

1.	NATURE AND CONTINUANCE OF OPERATIONS

	Organization

	The Company was incorporated in the Province of British Columbia, Canada on June 16, 1995.

	Exploration Stage Activities

	The Company has been in the exploration stage since its formation and has not yet realized any revenues from its planned operations. It is primarily engaged in the acquisition and exploration of mining properties. Upon location of a commercial reserve, the Company would enter the development stage.

	Going Concern

	The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. This contemplates that assets will be realized and liabilities and commitments satisfied in the normal course of business.

	As reported in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company has incurred a net loss of $598,783 for the year ended December 31, 2007, and has accumulated a net loss of $15,555,717 since its inception. The Company has no sources of revenue. The continuance in the future of the Company is dependent upon its ability to obtain additional financing as needed and ultimately upon future acquisition, exploration and development of profitable operations from its mineral property interests. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management has plans to seek additional capital through a private placement of its common stock and loans from related parties. Although there are no assurances that management’s plans will be realized, management believes that the Company will be able to continue operations in the future. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary in the event the Company cannot continue in existence.

2.	SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

	The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and in management’s opinion have been properly prepared within reasonable limits of materiality and within the framework of the significant accounting policies summarized below:

	a)	Basis of Presentation

		These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned inactive subsidiary, Entourage USA Inc. which was incorporated in the State of Nevada on November 3, 2003. All inter-company transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation.

ENTOURAGE MINING LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2007 AND 2006

(Stated in Canadian Dollars)

2.	SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES(continued)

	b)	Mineral Claim Payments and Exploration Expenditures

		The Company is primarily engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral properties.

		Mineral property acquisition costs are capitalized in accordance with EITF 04-2 when management has determined that probable future benefits consisting of a contribution to future cash inflows have been identified and adequate financial resources are available or are expected to be available as required to meet the terms of property acquisition and budgeted exploration and development expenditures. In the event that mineral property acquisition costs are paid with Company shares, those shares are valued at the estimated fair value at the time the shares are due.

		Mineral property exploration costs are expensed as incurred.

		When mineral properties are acquired under option agreements with future acquisition payments to be made at the sole discretion of the Company, those future payments, whether in cash or shares, are recorded only when the Company has made or is obliged to make the payment or issue the shares. Because the Company has not yet earned the legal rights to its mineral properties under option agreements, all option payments have been expensed to date.

		When it has been determined that a mineral property can be economically developed as a result of establishing proven and probable reserves and pre feasibility, the costs incurred to develop such property are capitalized.

		Estimated future removal and site restoration costs, when determinable are provided over the life of proven reserves on a units-of-production basis. Costs, which include production equipment removal and environmental remediation, are estimated each period by management based on current regulations, actual expenses incurred, and technology and industry standards. Any charge is included in exploration expense or the provision for depletion and depreciation during the period and the actual restoration expenditures are charged to the accumulated provision amounts as incurred.

		As of the date of these financial statements, the Company has incurred only property acquisition option payments and exploration costs which have been expensed as incurred.

		To date the Company has not established any proven or probable reserves on its mineral properties.

	c)	Use of Estimates

		The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions of future events that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses for the reporting period. Significant areas requiring the use of management estimates relate to allocations of expenditures to resource property interests, mineral property carrying values, useful lives of equipment for depreciation and amortization, asset impairment tests, and determination of fair value for stock based transactions. Other areas requiring estimates include deferred tax balances and valuation allowances. Financial results as determined by actual events could differ from those estimates.

ENTOURAGE MINING LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2007 AND 2006

(Stated in Canadian Dollars)

2.	SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES(continued)

	d)	Equipment

		Equipment is stated at cost less accumulated amortization. Amortization is calculated using the declining balance method as follows:

Office furniture	20% on declining balance basis
Computer equipment	30% on declining balance basis

	e)	Environmental Costs

		Environmental expenditures that relate to current operations are charged to operations or capitalized as appropriate. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations, and which do not contribute to current or future revenue generation, are charged to operations. Liabilities are recorded when environmental assessments and/or remedial efforts are probable, and the cost can be reasonably estimated. Generally, the timing of these accruals coincides with the earlier of completion of a feasibility study or the Company’s commitments to plan of action based on the then known facts.

	f)	Capital Stock – Flow-through shares

		Under United States GAAP when flow-through shares are issued, the proceeds are allocated between the issue of shares and the sale of tax benefits. The allocation is made based on the difference between the quoted price of the existing shares and the amount that the investor pays for the flow- through shares. The stockholders' equity is reduced and a liability is recognized for this difference. The liability is reversed when the tax benefits are renounced and a deferred tax asset is recognized at that time. Income tax expense (recovery) is the difference between the amount of the deferred tax liability and the asset recognized on issuance.

	g)	Foreign Currency Translation

		The functional currency of the Company is Canadian dollars and these financial statements are presented in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted. Foreign denominated monetary assets and liabilities are translated to their Canadian dollar equivalents using foreign exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Non-monetary items are translated at historical exchange rates, except for items carried at market value, which are translated at the rate of exchange in effect at the balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses are translated at average rates of exchange during the year. Exchange gains and losses arising on foreign currency translation are included in the determination of operating results for the period.

	h)	Financial Instruments

		The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash, accounts payable and accrued liabilities and amounts payable to related parties. Unless otherwise noted, it is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest or credit risks arising from these financial instruments. The fair value of the Company’s current assets and current liabilities are estimated by management to approximate their carrying values based on the immediate or short-term maturity of these instruments.

ENTOURAGE MINING LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2007 AND 2006

(Stated in Canadian Dollars)

2.	SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES(continued)

	h)	Financial Instruments (continued)

		The fair value of amounts due to related parties is not determinable as they have no repayment terms and similar market interest rates do not exist (Note 6).

		The fair value of the Company’s rights to purchase net smelter royalties (“NSR”) (refer to Note 4) is not determinable at the current stage of the Company’s exploration program. No value has been assigned by management. The Company does not use any derivative or hedging instruments.

	i)	Income Taxes

		The Company has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 109 – “Accounting for Income Taxes” (SFAS 109). This standard requires the use of the asset and liability approach for accounting and reporting of income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. To the extent that it is more likely than not that a deferred tax asset will be realized, a valuation allowance is provided.

		The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (“FIN 48”), on December 1, 2007. Previously, the Company had accounted for tax contingencies in accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies. As required by Interpretation 48, which clarifies SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, the Company recognizes the financial statement benefit of a tax position only after determining that the relevant tax authority would more likely than not sustain the position following an audit. For tax positions meeting this standard, the amount recognized in the financial statements is the largest benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the relevant tax authority. At the adoption date, the Company applied Interpretation 48 to all tax positions for which the statute of limitations remained open. The adoption of FIN 48 did not have a material impact in the financial statements during the period ended December 31, 2007.

ENTOURAGE MINING LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2007 AND 2006

(Stated in Canadian Dollars)

2.	SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES(continued)

	j)	Stock Based Compensation

		On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) (SFAS No. 123R), Share- Based Payment, which addresses the accounting for stock-based payment transactions in which an enterprise receives employee services in exchange for (a) equity instruments of the enterprise or (b) liabilities that are based on the fair value of the enterprise’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of such equity instruments. In January 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 107, which provides supplemental implementation guidance for SFAS No. 123R. SFAS No. 123R eliminates the ability to account for stock-based compensation transactions using the intrinsic value method under Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and instead generally requires that such transactions be accounted for using a fair-value-based method. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair-value of stock-based awards under SFAS No. 123R, consistent with that used for pro forma disclosures under SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. The Company has elected the modified prospective transition method as permitted by SFAS No. 123R and accordingly prior periods have not been restated to reflect the impact of SFAS No. 123R. The modified prospective transition method requires that stock-based compensation expense be recorded for all new and unvested stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, and employee stock purchase plan shares that are ultimately expected to vest as the requisite service is rendered beginning on January 1, 2006 the first day of the Company’s fiscal year 2006.

	k)	Loss Per Share

		Basic loss per common share is computed in accordance with SFAS No. 128 – “Earnings Per Share” by dividing income and losses by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the year. Diluted loss per share amounts reflect the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common shares were exercised or converted to common shares. For the years presented, diluted loss per share is equal to basic loss per share as the effect of potential dilution of securities is anti-dilutive.

	l)	Government Grants

		The Company is eligible for mineral exploration grants from the Province of Quebec, Canada. The Company recognizes these grants upon the amount is determinable and collection is reasonable.. Government grants are accounted for as an offset of mineral property costs.

	m)	Recent Accounting Pronouncements

		In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”. The objective of SFAS 157 is to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and to expand disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements and does not require any new fair value measurements. The provisions of SFAS No. 157 are effective for fair value measurements made in fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's future reported financial position or results of operations.

ENTOURAGE MINING LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2007 AND 2006

(Stated in Canadian Dollars)

2.	SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES(continued)

	m)	Recent Accounting Pronouncements (continued)

		In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”. This Statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently assessing the impact of SFAS No. 159 on its financial position and results of operations.

		In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (Revised) “Business Combinations”. SFAS 141 (Revised) establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer of a business recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. The statement also provides guidance for recognizing and measuring the goodwill acquired in the business combination and determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. The guidance will become effective for the fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2008. The management is in the process of evaluating the impact SFAS 141 (Revised) will have on the Company’s financial statements upon adoption.

		In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160 “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements-an amendment of ARB No. 51”. SFAS 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. The guidance will become effective for the fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2008. Management is in the process of evaluating the impact SFAS 160 will have on the Company’s financial statements upon adoption.

		On December 21, 2007, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 110, (“SAB 110). SAB 110 provides guidance to issuers on the method allowed in developing estimates of expected term of “plain vanilla” share options in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment”. The staff will continue to accept, under certain circumstances, the use of a simplified method beyond December 31, 2007 which amends question 6 of Section D.2 as included in SAB 107, “Valuation of Share-Based Payment Arrangements for Public Companies”, which stated that the simplified method could not be used beyond December 31, 2007. SAB 110 is effective January 1, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, that the adoption of SAB 110 will have on its financial statements.

ENTOURAGE MINING LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2007 AND 2006

(Stated in Canadian Dollars)

3.	EQUIPMENT

2007

2006

Cost

Accumulated

Net

Accumulated

Net

depreciation

Book

Cost

depreciation

Book

Value

Office furniture

2,812

1,516

1,296

2,812

1,192

1,620

Computer

5,033

3,566

1,467

5,033

2,937

2,096

equipment

7,845

5,082

2,763

7,845

4,129

3,716

4.	MINERAL EXPLORATION PROPERTIES

	a)	Nevada Property – Black Warrior Project

		Pursuant to the terms of a Mining Sublease and Option to Purchase Agreement, dated June 1, 2004, the Company acquired a mining lease and an option to acquire a 100% interest in and to certain patented and un-patented mineral claims located in Esmeralda County, Nevada. The lease was for an initial ten-year term with ten one year extensions available and was subject to a 3% NSR.

		There was no exploration work done on the Black Warrior Project in 2006 and in November 2006 the Company informed the Lessor of its intend to relinquish its interest in the Black Warrior project. On December 6, 2006 the Company paid $7,500 (the estimated cost of reclamation) to the Lessor (Goodsprings Development Corp.) to remediate the property.

	b)	Doran Property (Quebec)

i) By agreement dated March 15, 2005, the Company obtained an option to acquire a 100% interest in certain mineral properties in south-central Quebec (the “Doran Property”) in exchange for cash payments of $220,000, the issuance of 750,000 common shares and the expenditure of $1,000,000 on the Doran Property over three years, as follows:

	a.	$35,000 and 125,000 common shares within ten business days of the date of approval of the agreement (paid and issued);
	b.	$35,000 and 125,000 common shares on or before March 15, 2006 (paid and issued); and expending $200,000 on or before March 15, 2006 (incurred);
	c.	$75,000 (paid in 2007) and 250,000 common shares on or before March 15, 2007 (issued in 2007- Note 4b iv)); and expending $300,000 on or before March 15, 2007 (incurred by Abbastar Holdings Inc. (“Abbastar”) – Note 4b iii)); and
	d.	$75,000 (paid in 2008 by Abbastar – Note 4b v)) and 250,000 common shares on or before March 15, 2008 (issued in 2007 – Note 4b iv)); and expend an additional $500,000 on or before March 15, 2008 (incurred by Abbastar).

ii) The property interest is subject to a 2.5% NSR. The Company has the right to purchase up to three-fifths of the NSR, or 1.5%, for $1,750,000.

ENTOURAGE MINING LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2007 AND 2006

(Stated in Canadian Dollars)

4.	MINERAL EXPLORATION PROPERTIES (continued)

Doran Property (Quebec) (continued)

iii) On February 13, 2007 the Company entered into an option agreement (the “Option”) with Abbastar Holdings Inc. (“Abbastar”), a TSX Venture Exchange listed company, whereby Abbastar may earn up to a 70% interest in the Doran Property by making a one time cash payment of $100,000 CDN (received) to the Company and spending $5,000,000 on the Doran Property over 4 years (The Company retains the right to purchase the Net Smelter Royalty on the Doran Property). The terms of the Option provide that Abbastar may earn its interest in the Doran property as follows:

20% interest by spending $500,000 on or before February 13, 2008 (spent);
15% additional interest by expending an additional $1,000,000 on or before February 13, 2009;
15% additional interest by expending an additional $1,500,000 on or before February 13, 2010; and
20% additional interest by expending an additional $2,000,000 on or before February 13, 2011.

iv) In consideration for the Doran Property vendor consenting to the Option Agreement with Abbastar, the Company issued the balance of shares (500,000) due to the Doran Property vendor on March 12, 2007.

v) On March 15, 2008, after the final payment of $75,000 was made by Abbastar on behalf of the Company, the Company became the owner of the Doran Property with 20% interest earned by Abbastar by spending $500,000 on the property.

c)	Hatchet Lake Property (Saskatchewan)
	By agreement dated April 7, 2005. as amended October 20, 2005, the Company obtained an option to acquire a 50% right in a certain prospective mineral property located in the Athabaska Basin area of Saskatchewan (the “Hatchet Lake Property”) in consideration for:
	1.	a cash payment of $220,000 on or before November 15, 2005 (paid);
	2.	making the following exploration expenditures on the property:
		(a) $100,000 on or before December 31, 2005 (completed February 2, 2006);
		(b) An additional $300,000 on or before February 1, 2006 (extended to June 30, 2006, per February 2, 2006 letter agreement; extended to July 1, 2007 per agreement dated June 30, 2006; extended to Sept 15, 2007 by agreement dated August 20, 2007);
		(c) An additional $450,000 on or before November 15, 2006 (extended to November 15, 2007 by agreement dated June 30, 2006) and
		(d) An additional $450,000 on or before November 15, 2007 (extended to November 15, 2008 by agreement dated June 30, 2006).
	3.	Upon payment of the $220,000 cash payment and completion of the expenditures as noted in (ii)(a) to (c) above, the Company will have exercised the Option as to a 25% interest in the property.
	4.	Upon payment of the $220,000 cash payment and completion of all of the expenditures as noted in (ii) above, the Company will have exercised the option and earned a 50% interest in the Property.
	5.	The term of the Agreement is for 5 years at which time the agreement, and the option granted thereunder, shall terminate if the option has not been exercised.

On October 20, 2005, the Company, by way of an assignment agreement with CMKM Diamonds Inc. (“CMKM”) and United Carina Resources Corp. (“United Carina”) the Company increased its interest in the Hatchet Lake property from an option to acquire 10% to an option to acquire 50%, by assuming all of the interests of CMKM in the Hatchet Lake properties.

ENTOURAGE MINING LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2007 AND 2006

(Stated in Canadian Dollars)

4.	MINERAL PROPERTY INTERESTS(continued)

	c)	Hatchet Lake Property (Saskatchewan) (continued)

		As consideration for the assignment agreement, the Company agreed to issue 15,000,000 of its common shares (issued January 3, 2006) to the CMKM shareholders. The 15,000,000 shares have been recorded as mineral property expenditures and an obligation to issue shares totaling $2,650,500 in the year ended December 31, 2005.

		The 15,000,000 shares paid as consideration for the Hatchet Lake property were not distributed to the CMKM shareholders as per the assignment agreements. On August 28, 2007, the Company filed, in the Supreme Court of British Columbia, a Writ of Summons and Statement of Claim against CMKM seeking to have the court set aside the assignment agreement between the Company and the Defendants (collectively, the “Contracts”) and requesting that the defendants return the 15,000,000 shares (the “Shares”) paid to CMKM for the Hatchet Lake property. (Note 10) In September 2007, the Company abandoned the property. The Company has no liabilities incurred by abandoning the Hatchet Lake Properties and no further payments are required.

	d)	The Smeaton/Forte a la Corne Property (Saskatchewan)

		By agreement dated October 20, 2005, as amended November 16, 2005, the Company entered into an option agreement with 101047025 Saskatchewan Ltd. (a private company) ("1010" or the “Operator”) to acquire an undivided 80% mineral rights interest in and to the Smeaton/Forte a la Corne diamond property in Saskatchewan.

		Under the terms of this agreement the Company issued 33,888,888 common shares in its capital stock (the "Smeaton/Fort a la Corne Shares") on January 3, 2006 of which 30,000,000 common were issued to CMKM and 3,888,888 shares were issued to 1010. The 33,888,888 shares were recorded as mineral property expenditures and an obligation to issue shares totaling $5,988,167 in the year ended December 31, 2005.

		The Smeaton/Forte a la Corne diamond property was the subject of an agreement between 1010 and CMKM dated August 1, 2003.

		In consideration of this option agreement, the Company has agreed to spend $2,500,000 on the Smeaton/Forte a la Corne properties over five years. There is no timetable or minimum requirements for these expenditures and the Company may, at its election, decide to pay the $2,500,000 in cash or in common shares of the Company to 1010. During 2006 the Company advanced $79,172 to 1010 (2005 - $121,458) as payment towards the maintenance of the claims under option.

		In 2005 and early 2006, the Company advised 1010, the Operator of the Property, that `it would not participate in any exploration by 1010 unless the exploration was conducted in accordance with NI 43-101 and mining best practices. 1010 nevertheless proceeded to perform work on the property and, on March 26, 2006, sent invoices to the Company totaling $280,000. The Company believes that it is not liable, under the terms of the Agreement or in any other way, for these invoices and has so advised 1010, most recently in its letter to 1010 dated April 27, 2007. Accordingly no accrual has been made for this contingent liability. To date, no collections or other proceedings have been commenced by 1010.

ENTOURAGE MINING LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2007 AND 2006

(Stated in Canadian Dollars)

4.	MINERAL PROPERTY INTERESTS(continued)

	d)	The Smeaton/Forte a la Corne Property (Saskatchewan) (continued)

		The agreement stated that the 30,000,000 shares were to be distributed to the CMKM shareholders and 1010 was to operate the Smeaton exploration in a “workmanlike fashion”. CMKM failed to distribute the 30,000,000 shares and the Company maintains that 1010 failed to operate the property in an operator like fashion and failed to comply with the Company’s various requests to have all previous claim materials sent to the Company. On August 28, 2007, the Company filed, in the Supreme Court of British Columbia, a Writ of Summons and Statement of Claim against 1010 and CMKM seeking to have the court set aside the Option agreement between the Company and the Defendants and requesting that the defendants return the 30,000,000 shares paid to CMKM and the 3,888,888 shares paid to 1010 for the Smeaton property. (Note 10).

	e)	Forte Diamond Property (Saskatchewan)

		On October 20, 2005, the Company entered into an agreement (the “Forte Diamond agreement”) with CMKM and Nevada Minerals, Inc. (a private Nevada corporation). The Company acquired all of CMKM's interest, in the agreement dated July 18, 2004, between CMKM and Nevada Minerals Inc. The Company acquired the right to an undivided 36% interest in the Forte diamond property, for consideration of the issuance of five million shares of the Company to CMKM shareholders. Upon completion of the due diligence on the Forte Diamond property in 2006, the Company decided not to proceed with this acquisition.

5.	CAPITAL STOCK

	a)	Issued Shares

		i)	On January 3, 2006 the Company issued 48,888,888 shares at a price of US$0.15 per share, for mineral property acquisitions (Notes 4 (c), (d) and (e)).

		ii)	On May 24, 2006, the Company closed a flow through private placement of 340,000 units at US $0.25 for total proceeds of $93,585 (US$85,000) (each unit consisting of one common share and one half share purchase warrant wherein the holder, by offering one full purchase warrant may purchase an additional share at US $0.30 for two-years). Both the common shares and the share purchase warrants comprising the units are flow-through.

		iii)	On December 27, 2006 the Company closed a non-brokered flow through private placement of 200,000 units at $0.23 for proceeds of $46,000. Each unit consists of one flow through share and one-half flow through warrant enabling the purchaser to exchange one full flow through warrant for one flow through common share at a price of $0.35 for a period of two years.

	iv)	On March 7, 2006 the Company issued 125,000 shares for a consideration of $51,772 under the option agreement to acquire interest in 44 mineral claims known as Doran Property situated in southeast Quebec.

	v)	During the year ended December 31, 2006, 410,000 shares were issued at U.S. $0.15 per share pursuant to exercise of stock options. Pursuant to exercise of warrants 744,500 shares were issued at $0.30 per share and 955,000 shares were issued at US$0.25 per share.

	vi)	During the year ended December 31, 2007, 100,000 incentive stock options with an exercise price of US $0.15 were exercised by two optionees for proceeds of $17,267 (US$15,000)

ENTOURAGE MINING LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2007 AND 2006

(Stated in Canadian Dollars)

5.	CAPITAL STOCK(continued)

Issued Shares (continued)

vii)

On March 12, 2007, the Company issued 500,000 shares at a price of US$0.30 per share, to the vendor of the Doran property pursuant to the revised option agreement for a consideration of $175,530 (US$150,000).

viii)

On March 30, 2007, the Company closed a US $0.15 per unit private placement of 266,667 units for gross proceeds of $46,184 (US $40,000) and the Company paid $4,537 as finder fee. Each unit consists of one share and one-half warrant. Each full warrant is exercisable at a price of US$0.25 on or before March 30, 2008. .

ix)

On June 18, 2007, the Company issued 100,000 shares at a price of US$0.20 per share, pursuant to an agreement to settle a debt of $23,306 (US$20,000).

	b)	Stock Options

		In February 2004 the Company implemented a Stock Option Plan (“SOP”) for its officers, directors and employees to allow for up to 1,600,000 share purchase options to be granted at US $0.25 per share, for a period not to exceed five years. In November 2004 the SOP was amended to provide for the issuance of up to 2,200,000 incentive stock options to directors, officers, employees and non-investor relations consultants. During January, 2006 the Company increased the stock option plan from 2,200,000 shares to 7,200,000 shares.

		The Company accounts for the grant of options using the fair value method prescribed in SFAS No. 123R, using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Compensation for unvested options is amortized over the vesting period.

		In January 2006 the Company filed a form S-8 to register shares issuable under the Company’s Stock Option Plan which provides that a total of 7,200,000 shares of common stock can be issued as incentive stock options to directors, employees and consultants of the Company. During January 2006, the Company granted to directors, employees and consultants, stock options to purchase 3,500,000 shares at U.S. $0.40 per share. As a result, in accordance with SFAS 123R, a stock based compensation expense of $1,717,984 was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: (1) dividend yield of 0%, (2) expected volatility of 140%, (3) risk free interest rate of 3.5% and, (4) expected life of 3.05 years.

ENTOURAGE MINING LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2007 AND 2006

(Stated in Canadian Dollars)

On June 30, 2006, the Company granted to directors, employees and consultants, additional stock options to purchase 1,550,000 shares at U.S. $0.30 per share. As a result, in accordance with SFAS 123R, a stock based compensation expense of $309,400 was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: (1) dividend yield of 0%, (2) expected volatility of 140%, (3) risk free interest rate of 3.5% and, (4) expected life of 2.58 years.

On Feb 27, 2007, the Company repriced 5,050,000 of its incentive stock options (1,550,000 options originally priced at US$0.30 and 3,500,000 options originally priced at US$0.40) to US$0.25. The expiry date of the options remained unchanged at Feb 2, 2009. A fair value of $92,900 for the re-pricing of the options was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: (1) dividend yield of 0%, (2) expected volatility of 123%, (3) risk free interest rate of 4% and, (4) expected life of 1.93 years.

On October 22, 2007 the Company cancelled options to acquire 250,000 shares at US$0.25 per share.

On June 22, 2007, the Company granted to a consultant to purchase 250,000 shares at US$0.15 per share. As a result, in accordance with SFAS 123R, a stock based compensation expense of $8,874 was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: (1) dividend yield of 0%, (2) expected volatility of 119%, (3) risk free interest rate of 4.14% and, (4) expected life of 1.29 years.

Activity under the SOP is summarized as follows:

			Weighted
			Average Exercise	Weighted
	Options		Price (U.S. $)	Average
	Outstanding			Life
Balance, December 31, 2005	1,850,000		0.15	2.99
Granted	5,050,000		-	-
Exercised	(410,000	)	-	-
Balance December 31, 2006	6,490,000		0.32	2.09
Cancelled	(250,000	)	-	-
Granted	250,000		-	-
Exercised	(100,000	)	-	-
Balance, December 31, 2007	6,390,000		0.225	1.09

The following table summarizes information concerning outstanding and exercisable common stock options under the SOP at December 31, 2007:

		Remaining	Weighted	Number of	Weighted
Range of		Contractual	Average	Options	Average
Exercise	Options	Life	Exercise	Currently	Exercise Price
Prices	Outstanding	(in years)	Price	Exercisable
U.S. $0.15 -
U.S. $0.25	6,390,000	1.09	U.S. $0.225	6,390,000	U.S. $0.225

ENTOURAGE MINING LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2007 AND 2006

(Stated in Canadian Dollars)

5.	CAPITAL STOCK(continued)

	c)	Warrants

		On November 12, 2007, the Company extended the expiry date of 5,333,334 warrants from November 17, 2007 to November 17, 2008. A fair value of $11,300 was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: (1) dividend yield of 0%, (2) expected volatility of 50%, (3) risk free interest rate of 4.14% and, (4) expected life of 1 year.

			Weighted
			Average	Weighted
	Warrants		Exercise Price	Average
	Outstanding		($ U.S.)	Life
Balance, December 31, 2005	11,511,334		0.68	3.61
Granted	270,000		-	-
Exercised	(1,699,500	)	-	-
Expired	(3,878,500	)	-	-
Balance, December 31, 2006	6,203,334		0.25	0.90
Granted	133,333		-
Exercised	-		-
Expired	(600,000	)	-
Balance, December 31, 2007	5,736,667		0.253	0.85

The following table lists the common share warrants outstanding at December 31, 2007. Each warrant is exchangeable for one common share.

Warrants	Exercise	Expiry
Outstanding	Price	Date


170,000	U.S. $0.30	May 23, 2008
5,333,334	U.S. $0.25	November 17, 2008
100,000	CDN $0.35	December 27, 2008
133,333	U.S. $0.25	March 30, 2008
5,736,667

6.	RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

	Amounts payable to related parties as of December 31, 2007 of $119,653 (2006 - $29,352) is owing to directors and former directors and to companies controlled by the former directors for consulting fees and for expenses paid on behalf of the Company.

	During the year ended December 31, 2007 the Company incurred $195,000 in management fees to its directors and officers (2006 - $100,500). (Refer to Note 9.)

	The above transactions have been in the normal course of operations and, in management’s opinion, undertaken with the same terms and conditions as transactions with unrelated parties.

ENTOURAGE MINING LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2007 AND 2006

(Stated in Canadian Dollars)

7.	INCOME TAXES

	The actual income tax provisions differ from the expected amounts calculated by applying the Canadian combined federal and provincial corporate income tax rates to the Company’s loss before income taxes. The components of these differences are as follows:

	2007		2006
	$		$
Loss before income taxes	(598,783	)	(3,017,828	)
Corporate tax rate	34.1%		34.1%

Expected tax expense (recovery)	(204,185	)	(1,029,079	)
Increase (decrease) resulting from:
Amounts not deductible for tax	37,148		699,319
Renounced exploration expenditures	-		44,667
Change in deferred tax asset valuation
allowance and other	167,037		240,426

Deferred tax provision (recovery)	-		(44,667	)

The Company’s tax-effected deferred income tax assets and liabilities are estimated as follows:

	2007		2006
	$		$
Mineral properties tax base in excess of carrying value	2,897,000		3,652,000
Non-capital losses available	368,000		343,000
Other	18,000		18,000
Potential deferred income tax assets	3,283,000		4,013,000
Less: valuation allowance	(3,283,000	)	(4,013,000	)
Net Deferred Income Tax Asset	-		-

As the criteria for recognizing deferred income tax assets have not been met due to the uncertainty of realization, a valuation allowance of 100% has been recorded for the current and prior year.

The Company has approximately $1,348,000 (2006 - $974,000) of non-capital losses which can be applied to reduce future taxable income, expiring as follows:

Year of Expiry					Amount
					$

2008					59,000
2009					59,000
2010					73,000
2014					212,000
2015					211,000
2026					307,000
2027					427,000
					1,348,000

The Company has certain resource related deductions and other losses of approximately $10,771,000 (2006 - $10,710,000) which may be available to be offset against future taxable income in Canada. The realization of these tax benefits in future years will be recorded as an adjustment to the corporate tax provision in the year realized.

ENTOURAGE MINING LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2007 AND 2006

(Stated in Canadian Dollars)

8.	SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION AND NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES

		Year ended December, 2007		Year ended December, 2006
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest	$	453	$	343
Income taxes	$	-	$	-

	During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company issued 100,000 shares to satisfy a debt of $23,306.

	During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company issued 500,000 shares at a value of $175,530 under the option agreement to acquire interest in 44 mineral claims known as Doran, Quebec Property situated in southeast Quebec.

	During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company issued 48,888,888 shares at a price of US$0.15 per share, for mineral property acquisitions (Notes 4 (c) and (d) )

	During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company issued 125,000 shares at a value of $51,772 under the option agreement to acquire interest in 44 mineral claims known as Doran, Quebec Property situated in southeast Quebec.

9.	COMMITMENTS

	On July 3, 2007, the Company entered into new consulting agreements with (a) two of its directors and the CFO for $5,000 a month each and (b) for $2,500 a month with one of its directors. As well, the existing consulting agreement for the president was revised to $7,500 a month and the existing consulting agreement for the corporate communications person was revised to $5,000 a month. All these agreements can be cancelled on 30 days notice to the other party in writing.

10.	CONTINGENCY

	On August 27, 2007, in the Supreme Court of British Columbia, the Company filed a Writ of Summons and Statement of Claim against CMKM and 1010 seeking to have the Court put aside the Mineral Property Option and Assignment Agreements (the “Agreements”) among the parties dated October 20, 2005 for Hatchet and Smeaton properties.

	As consideration for the Agreements the Company had issued 48,888,888 shares of common stock (the “Consideration Shares”) of the Company capital to acquire a 50% interest in certain mineral claims prospective for uranium (Hatchet Lake) and an 80% interest in certain mineral claims prospective for diamonds (Smeaton Property) all located in the Province of Saskatchewan.

	Of the 48,888,888 Consideration shares, 15,000,000 shares were paid for the Hatchet Lake property and 33,888,888 shares were paid for the Smeaton property. Furthermore 3,888,888 shares of the Smeaton

ENTOURAGE MINING LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2007 AND 2006

(Stated in Canadian Dollars)

	Consideration shares were paid to the property vendor, 1010 and the remaining 45,000,000 shares were paid to CMKM with the proviso that these shares were to be distributed to the CMKM shareholders.

	In seeking to have the Agreements set aside, the Company claims that CMKM has breached the terms of the Agreements by not distributing the 45,000,000 shares to the CMKM shareholders as required by the Agreements; as well, the Company is seeking to have 1010 return the 3,888,888 shares as the Company contends that 1010 is in breach by not completing work on the Smeaton property in a workmanlike fashion by providing preliminary budget submissions, daily drill records and general field information as is the industry standard. As well, the Company contends that 1010. failed to provide documentation requested by the Company to have a National Instrument 43-101 compliant report completed on the Smeaton property.

	The Company has filed all required documentation with the courts for the process of examination for discovery but has not received the same from CMKM or 1010. The Company has requested of both defendants appropriate dates for trial but no response in forthcoming at the time of this report.

	The outcome of the above legal proceedings is not presently determinable, and the amount of the ultimate recovery, if any, can not be reasonably estimated at this time so no accrual has been recorded in the current year end.

11.	GOVERNMENT GRANTS

	The Company is entitled to apply for certain refundable tax credits in respect of qualifying mining exploration expenses incurred in the Province of Quebec, Canada. This tax credit recovery has been applied against the exploration costs incurred. In 2007 the Company received a total of $150,723 in refundable taxes and mining duties (2006 – $57,745) applied for in tax returns for December 31, 2006.

ITEM 18. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Not applicable. Financial statements are provided under Item 17.

ITEM 19. EXHIBITS

1	Certificate of Incorporation and Certificate of Amendment and Registration of Restated Articles and Bylaws *

4	Material Contracts
	a) Agreement dated March 17, 2003, between the Company and the YK Group (incorporated by reference to the Company’s 20-F dated June 06, 2003); *
	b) Agreement dated June 1, 2004 between the Company and Goodsprings Development Corp. whereby the Company can acquire up to a 100% interest in and to the Black Warrior Project (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s 20-F dated July 1, 2005); *
	c) Agreement dated March 15, 2005 between Fayz Yacoub and the Company whereby the Company can acquire a 100% interest in the Doran Uranium Property (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s 20-F dated July 1, 2005); and *
	d) Agreement dated April 7, 2005 between Star Uranium Corp. (formerly Star Uranium Corp. (formerly known as United Carina Resources Corp.).) and the Company whereby the Company can acquire a 20% right in the Hatchet Lake Property (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s 20- F dated July 1, 2005); and *
	e) Agreement dated April 21, 2005 between the Company and Star Uranium Corp. (formerly known as United Carina Resources Corp.) whereby Star may acquire up to a 10% interest in the Company’s Black Warrior Project (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s 20-F dated July 1, 2005); and *
	f) Agreement dated April 21, 2005 between the Company and CMKM Diamonds, Inc. whereby CMKM may acquire up to a 10% interest in the Company’s Black Warrior Project (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s 20-F dated July 1, 2005); and *
	g) Agreement between the Company and Star Uranium dated October 21, 2005 whereby the Company may acquire a 50% interest in the Hatchet Lake *
	h) Assignment Agreement between the Company and CMKM Diamonds Inc. whereby the Company may acquire any and all interest of CMKM Diamonds Inc.’s interest in the Hatchet Lake Property (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s 6-K dated November 23, 2005); and *
	i) Agreement between the Company and 101047025 Saskatchewan Ltd. whereby the Company may acquire an 80% interest in the Smeaton Property (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s 6-K dated November 25, 2005); and *
	j) Agreement between the Company and Goodsprings Development Corp. whereby Goodsprings extended the terms of the Company’s June 1, 2006 property payment as four quarterly payments. **
	k) Entourage-101047025 Saskatchewan Ltd. claim file for the Smeaton Property; and **
	l) Smeaton Property location map with legend; and **
	m) Hatchet Lake Property map with legend.; and**
	n) Revised Smeaton claim file. ***
	o) Entourage-Abbastar Uranium Option Agreement Dated February 13, 2007
	p) Entourage Mining Company Ethics Policy

31.1	Section 302 Certification - CEO

31.2	Section 302 Certification - CFO

32.1	Section 906 Certification - CEO

32.2	Section 906 Certification - CFO

*incorporated by reference from our registration statement on Form F-1 that was originally filed with the Commission on December 4, 2003.
**incorporated by reference from our filing on Form 20-f that was filed with the Commission on July 06, 2006.
*** incorporated by reference from our filing on Form 20-f that was filed with the Commission on June 29, 2007.

SIGNATURES

The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this statement on its behalf.

ENTOURAGE MINING LTD.

Dated: February 25, 2009

“Gregory F Kennedy”

Gregory F Kennedy
President, Director

Entourage Mining (ETGMF) Inactive 20-F/A2007 FY Annual report (foreign) (amended)