Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 9 Months Ended | 12 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2014 | Dec. 31, 2013 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | | |
Nature of Operations | Nature of Operations | Luna Innovations Incorporated (“We” or the “Company”), headquartered in Roanoke, Virginia was incorporated in the Commonwealth of Virginia in 1990 and reincorporated in the State of Delaware in April 2003. |
Luna Innovations Incorporated (“we,” “Luna Innovations” or the “Company”) is incorporated in the State of Delaware and headquartered in Roanoke, Virginia. We develop, manufacture and market fiber optic sensing, test and measurement products and are focused on bringing new and innovative technology solutions to measure, monitor, protect and improve critical processes in the aerospace, automotive, energy, composite, telecommunications and defense industries. We are organized into two main groups, which work closely together to turn ideas into products: our Technology Development segment and our Products and Licensing segment. Our business model is designed to accelerate the process of bringing new and innovative technologies to market. We have a history of net losses from continuing operations from 2005 through the nine months ended September 30, 2014. We have historically managed our liquidity through cost reduction initiatives, debt financings, capital market transactions and asset sales. | We develop, manufacture and market fiber optic sensing and test & measurement products focused on bringing new and innovative technology solutions to measure, monitor, protect and improve critical processes in the aerospace, automotive, energy, composite, telecommunications and defense industries. Our business model is designed to accelerate the process of bringing new and innovative products to market. We use our in-house technical expertise to perform applied research services on government-funded projects across a range of technologies and also for corporate customers in the fiber optic sensing area. We are organized into two business segments: our Technology Development segment and our Products and Licensing segment. Our Technology Development segment performs applied research principally on government-funded projects. Most of the government funding in our Technology Development segment is derived from the U.S. Government’s Small Business Innovation Research, or SBIR, program coordinated by the U.S. Small Business Administration, or SBA. Our Products and Licensing segment focuses on fiber optic test and measurement, sensing, and instrumentation products. |
Since the second half of 2008, the increased turmoil in the U.S. and global capital markets and a global slowdown of economic growth created a substantially more difficult business environment. Our ability to access the capital markets may be limited. Economic and market conditions may not improve significantly during the remainder of 2014 and could get worse. | We have a history of net losses and negative cash flow from operations. We have historically managed our liquidity through cost reduction initiatives, debt financings and capital markets transactions. |
Although there can be no guarantees, we believe that our current cash balance will provide adequate liquidity for us to meet our working capital needs over the next twelve months. | Although there can be no guarantees, we believe that our current cash balance, including the proceeds from the sale of our medical shape sensing business to Intuitive in January 2014 described in Note 15, our cash flow from operations, and the funds available to us under the Credit Facility described in Note 3 below, provide adequate liquidity for us to meet our working capital needs through 2014. |
Consolidation Policy | Consolidation Policy | Consolidation Policy |
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and include the accounts of the Company and our wholly owned subsidiaries. We have eliminated from our financial results all significant intercompany transactions. We do not have any investments in entities we believe are variable interest entities for which we are the primary beneficiary. | Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP and include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. We eliminate from our financial results all significant intercompany transactions. We do not have any investments in entities we believe are variable interest entities for which the Company is the primary beneficiary. |
Use of Estimates | Use of Estimates | Use of Estimates |
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Although these estimates are based on our knowledge of current events and actions we may undertake in the future, actual results may differ from such estimates and assumptions. | The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. |
| Although these estimates are based on our knowledge of current events and actions we may undertake in the future, actual results may differ from such estimates and assumptions. |
Technology Development Revenues | | Technology Development Revenues |
We perform research and development for U.S. government agencies, educational institutions and commercial organizations. We recognize revenues under research contracts when a contract has been executed, the contract price is fixed and determinable, delivery of services or products has occurred and collection of the contract price is considered reasonably assured. Revenue is earned under cost reimbursable, time and materials and fixed price contracts. Direct contract costs are expensed as incurred. |
Under cost reimbursable contracts, we are reimbursed for costs that are determined to be reasonable, allowable and allocable to the contract and are paid a fixed fee representing the profit negotiated between us and the contracting agency. Revenue from cost reimbursable contracts is recognized as costs are incurred plus a portion of the fee earned. Revenue from time and materials contracts is recognized based on direct labor hours expended at contract billing rates plus other billable direct costs. |
Revenue from fixed price research contracts that involve the delivery of services and a prototype model is recognized under the percentage of completion method. Fixed price arrangements that involve the delivery of research reports are recognized under the proportional performance method based upon the ratio of costs incurred to achieve contract milestones to total estimated cost as this method more accurately measures performance under these arrangements. Losses on contracts, if any, are recognized in the period in which they become known. |
Intellectual Property License Revenues | | Intellectual Property License Revenues |
Amounts received from third parties for licenses to our intellectual property are recognized when earned under the terms of the agreements. Revenues are recognized upon transfer of the license unless we have continuing obligations for which fair value cannot be established, in which case the revenues are recognized over the period of the obligation. If there are extended payment terms, license fee revenues are recognized as these payments become due and collection is reasonably assured. We consider all arrangements with payment terms extending beyond 12 months not to be fixed and determinable. |
Certain of our license arrangements have also required us to enter into research and development agreements. Accordingly, we allocate our arrangement fees to the various elements based upon objective reliable evidence of fair value, if available. For those arrangements in which evidence of fair value is not available, we defer revenues from any up-front payments and recognize them over the service period in the arrangement. Certain of these arrangements also include the payment of performance bonuses based upon the achievement of specific milestones. Generally, there are no assurances at the onset of these arrangements that the milestones will be achieved. As such, fees related to such milestones are excluded from the initial allocation of the arrangement fee and are recognized upon achievement of the milestone provided that all other revenue recognition criteria are met. |
Product Sales Revenues | | Product Sales Revenues |
Revenues from product sales are generated by the sale of commercial products and services under various sales programs to the end user and through distribution channels. We sell fiber optic sensing systems to end users for use in numerous fiber optic based measurement applications. Revenues are recorded net of applicable sales taxes collected from customers and payable to state or local governmental entities. |
We recognize revenue relating to our products when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the selling price is fixed or determinable and collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. |
For multi-element arrangements that include tangible products that contain software that is essential to the tangible product’s functionality, we allocate revenue to all deliverables based on their relative selling prices. Other deliverables include extended warranty, training and various add-on products. In such circumstances, we use a hierarchy to determine the selling price to be used for allocating revenue to deliverables: (i) vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value or VSOE, (ii) third-party evidence of selling price or TPE, and (iii) best estimate of the selling price or ESP. VSOE generally exists only when we sell the deliverable separately and is the price actually charged by us for that deliverable. ESPs reflect our best estimates of what the selling prices of elements would be if they were sold regularly on a stand-alone basis. |
Our process for determining our ESP for deliverables without VSOE or TPE considers multiple factors that may vary depending upon the unique facts and circumstances related to each deliverable. Key factors considered in developing the ESPs include prices charged by us for similar offerings, our historical pricing practices, the nature of the deliverables, and the relative ESP of all of the deliverables as compared to the total selling price of the product. We may also consider, when appropriate, the impact of other products and services on selling price assumptions when developing and reviewing our ESPs. |
Revenues from product sales that require no ongoing obligations are recognized as revenues when shipped to the customer, title has passed and collection is reasonably assured. In transactions in which a right-of-return exists, revenues are deferred until acceptance has occurred and the period for the right-of-return has lapsed. |
Allowance for Uncollectible Receivables | | Allowance for Uncollectible Receivables |
Accounts receivable are recorded at their face amount, less an allowance for doubtful accounts. We review the status of our uncollected receivables on a regular basis. In determining the need for an allowance for uncollectible receivables, we consider our customers’ financial stability, past payment history and other factors that bear on the ultimate collection of such amounts. The allowance was $0 at December 31, 2012 and approximately $134,811 at December 31, 2013. |
Cash Equivalents | | Cash Equivalents |
We consider all highly liquid investments purchased with maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. To date, we have not incurred losses related to cash and cash equivalents. The Company regularly maintains cash balances with financial institutions which exceed Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance limits. At December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company had approximately $7.5 million and $6.1 million, respectively, in excess of FDIC insured limits. |
Fair Value Measurements | Fair Value Measurements | Fair Value Measurements |
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market in an orderly transaction between marketplace participants. Various valuation approaches can be used to determine fair value, each requiring different valuation inputs. The following hierarchy classifies the inputs used to determine fair value into three levels: | The Company’s financial assets and liabilities are measured at fair value, which is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset, or paid to transfer a liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants. Valuation techniques are based on observable or unobservable inputs. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s market assumptions. These two types of inputs have created the following fair value hierarchy: |
| |
| • | | Level 1—Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | • | | Level 1—Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets. | |
| |
| • | | Level 2—Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | • | | Level 2—Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which significant value drivers are observable. | |
| |
| • | | Level 3—Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | • | | Level 3—Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which significant value drivers are unobservable. | |
The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value because of the short-term nature of these instruments. The carrying value of our debt approximates fair value, as we consider the floating interest rate on our credit facilities with Silicon Valley Bank to be at market. Certain nonfinancial assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with U.S. GAAP. This includes items such as nonfinancial assets and liabilities initially measured at fair value in a business combination and nonfinancial long-lived asset groups measured at fair value for an impairment assessment. In general, nonfinancial assets including intangible assets and property and equipment are measured at fair value when there is an indication of impairment and are recorded at fair value only when any impairment is recognized. | The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value because of the short-term nature of these instruments. The carrying value of the promissory notes approximate fair value as the interest rate is comparable to the interest rate on our credit facility with Silicon Valley Bank, which we consider to be at market. |
Property and Equipment | | Property and Equipment |
Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. We record depreciation using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives: |
|
| | | | |
Equipment | | 3 – 7 years | | |
Furniture and fixtures | | 7 years | | |
Software | | 3 years | | |
Leasehold improvements | | Lesser of lease term or life of improvements | | |
Intangible Assets | Intangible Assets and Other Long Lived Assets | Intangible Assets |
Long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset might not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair market value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair market value, less cost to sell. | Intangible assets consist of patents related to certain intellectual property that we have developed or acquired. We amortize our patents over their estimated useful life of five years, and analyze them whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable to determine whether their carrying value has been impaired. |
Research, Development and Engineering | | Research, Development and Engineering |
|
Research, development and engineering expenses not related to contract performance are expensed as incurred. We expensed $2.8 million and $3.1 million of non-contract related research, development and engineering expenses for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2013, respectively. |
Valuation of Long-Lived Assets | | Valuation of Long-Lived Assets |
We review our long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets is measured by comparing the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds their fair value. Assets to be disposed of by sale are reflected at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. |
Inventory | | Inventory |
Inventory consists of finished goods, work in process and parts valued at the lower of cost (determined on the first-in, first-out basis) or market. We provide reserves for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory equal to the difference between the carrying value of the inventory and the estimated market value based upon assumptions about future demand and market conditions. |
Earnings Per Share | Earnings Per Share | Net Loss per Share |
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Basic per share data is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted per share data is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average shares outstanding during the period increased to include, if dilutive, the number of additional common share equivalents that would have been outstanding if potential common shares had been issued using the treasury stock method. Diluted per share data would also include the potential common share equivalents relating to convertible securities by application of the if-converted method. |
| | Net loss per share from continuing | | | Net (loss)/income attributable to common | | |
operations | stockholders | The effect of 2.4 million and 2.3 million common stock equivalents (which include outstanding warrants and stock options) are not included for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2013 respectively, as they are antidilutive to earnings per share due to the Company’s loss from continuing operations. |
| | For the three months | | | For the nine months | | | For the three months | | | For the nine months | | |
ended September 30, | ended September 30, | ended September 30, | ended September 30, | |
| | 2014 | | | 2013 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | | |
Numerator: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss from continuing operations | | $ | (466,556 | ) | | $ | (774,579 | ) | | $ | (2,184,989 | ) | | $ | (3,128,846 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net (loss)/income attributable to stockholders | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (770,930 | ) | | $ | (640,078 | ) | | $ | 6,796,522 | | | $ | 1,143,442 | | |
Denominator: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding | | | 15,016,429 | | | | 14,441,707 | | | | 14,821,619 | | | | 14,285,829 | | | | 15,016,429 | | | | 14,441,707 | | | | 14,821,619 | | | | 14,285,829 | | |
Weighted average common stock equivalents from assumed exercise of stock options and restricted stock awards | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 688,065 | | | | 730,703 | | |
Convertible preferred stock | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,321,514 | | | | 1,321,514 | | |
Preferred stock dividends | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 354,171 | | | | 255,056 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding | | | 15,016,429 | | | | 14,441,707 | | | | 14,821,619 | | | | 14,285,829 | | | | 15,016,429 | | | | 14,441,707 | | | | 17,185,369 | | | | 16,593,102 | | |
Basic net loss per share from continuing operations | | $ | (0.03 | ) | | $ | (0.05 | ) | | $ | (0.15 | ) | | $ | (0.22 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted net loss per share from continuing operations | | $ | (0.03 | ) | | $ | (0.05 | ) | | $ | (0.15 | ) | | $ | (0.22 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic net (loss)/income per share attributable to common stockholders | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (0.05 | ) | | $ | (0.04 | ) | | $ | 0.46 | | | $ | 0.08 | | |
Diluted net (loss)/income per share attributable to common stockholders | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (0.05 | ) | | $ | (0.04 | ) | | $ | 0.4 | | | $ | 0.07 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted-average anti-dilutive shares related to: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding stock options | | | 4,448,259 | | | | 5,322,656 | | | | 4,086,208 | | | | 5,322,686 | | | | 4,448,259 | | | | 5,322,656 | | | | 3,005,297 | | | | 4,095,725 | | |
Convertible preferred stock | | | 1,321,514 | | | | 1,321,514 | | | | 1,321,514 | | | | 1,321,514 | | | | 1,321,514 | | | | 1,321,514 | | | | — | | | | — | | |
Preferred stock dividends | | | 373,994 | | | | 274,879 | | | | 354,171 | | | | 255,056 | | | | 373,994 | | | | 274,879 | | | | — | | | | — | | |
Restricted stock | | | 330,160 | | | | 261,257 | | | | 290,394 | | | | 219,759 | | | | 330,160 | | | | 261,257 | | | | — | | | | — | | |
Carilion warrants | | | 366,000 | | | | 366,000 | | | | 366,000 | | | | 366,000 | | | | 366,000 | | | | 366,000 | | | | 366,000 | | | | 366,000 | | |
The weighted-average anti-dilutive shares shown in the foregoing table were not included in the computation of diluted net loss from continuing operations and net income per share attributable to common stockholders. For reporting periods in which we have reported net income attributable to common stockholders, weighted-average anti-dilutive shares comprise stock options that have exercise prices above the average stock price for the period. For reporting periods in which we have a net loss from continuing operations, the weighted-average anti-dilutive shares comprise shares that would have been dilutive had we had net income from continuing operations (e.g., convertible preferred stock, preferred stock dividends, restricted stock, warrants and stock options that have exercise prices below the average stock price for the period), plus the number of stock options that would be anti-dilutive had we had a net income from continuing operations. | |
Share-Based Compensation | Share-Based Compensation | Stock-Based Compensation |
We recognize share-based compensation expense based upon the fair value of the underlying equity award on the date of the grant. For restricted stock awards and restricted stock units, we recognize expense based upon the price of our underlying stock at the date of the grant. We have elected to use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to value any option or warrant awards granted. We amortize share-based compensation for such awards on a straight-line basis over the related service period of the awards taking into account the effects of the employees’ expected exercise and post-vesting employment termination behavior. To compute the volatility used in this model we use the historical volatility of our common stock over the expected life of options granted. The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury interest rates, the terms of which are consistent with the expected life of the stock options. The expected life and estimated post-employment termination behavior is based upon historical experience of homogeneous groups within our company. We also assume an expected dividend yield of zero for all periods, as we have never paid a dividend on our common stock and do not have any plans to do so in the future. | We have a stock-based compensation plan, which is described further in Note 8. We recognize compensation expense based upon the fair value of the underlying equity award as of the date of grant. The Company has elected to use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to value any awards granted. We amortize stock-based compensation for such awards on a straight-line method over the requisite service period of the awards taking into account the effects of the employees’ expected exercise and post-vesting employment termination behavior. |
The fair value of each option granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 was estimated as of the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: | The Company recognizes expense for equity instruments issued to non-employees based upon the fair value of the equity instruments issued. |
| The fair value of each option granted is estimated as of the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Nine Months Ended | | | Nine Months Ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
September 30, 2014 | September 30, 2013 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2012 | | 2013 |
Risk-free interest rate | | | 2.14 | % | | | 1.27 - 2.34 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Risk-free interest rate range | | 1.02% – 1.49% | | 1.27% – 2.34% |
Expected life of options (in years) | | | 7.5 | | | | 7.5 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Expected life of option-years | | 7.5 | | 7.5 |
Expected stock price volatility | | | 106 | % | | | 108 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Expected stock price volatility | | 108% | | 108% |
A summary of the activity for our 2003 Stock Plan and 2006 Equity Incentive Plan is presented below for the nine months ended September 30, 2014: | Executive turnover rates | | — % | | — % |
| Non-executive turnover rates | | 18.50% | | 14.70% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Expected dividend yield | | — | | — |
| | Options Outstanding | | | Options Exercisable | | | | | | |
| | Number of | | | Price per | | | Weighted | | | Aggregate | | | Number of | | | Weighted | | | Aggregate | | | | | | The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury interest rates, the terms of which are consistent with the expected life of the stock options. Expected volatility is based upon the average volatility of our common stock. The expected life and estimated post-employment termination behavior is based upon historical experience of homogeneous groups, executives and non-executes, within our company. We do not currently issue dividends nor do we expect to in the foreseeable future. |
Shares | Share | Average | Intrinsic | Shares | Average | Intrinsic | | | | | |
| Range | Exercise | Value (1) | | Exercise | Value (1) | | | | | |
| | Price | | | Price | | | | | | |
Balance, January 1, 2014 | | | 5,279,229 | | | $ | 0.35 - $6.55 | | | $ | 2.11 | | | $ | 784,154 | | | | 4,012,378 | | | $ | 2.28 | | | $ | 697,826 | | | | | | |
Granted | | | 915,952 | | | $ | 1.37 - $1.53 | | | $ | 1.42 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Exercised | | | (276,586 | ) | | $ | 0.35 - $1.27 | | | $ | 0.79 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Canceled | | | (1,470,336 | ) | | $ | 0.35 - $6.55 | | | $ | 1.4 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, September 30, 2014 | | | 4,448,259 | | | $ | 0.35 - $6.55 | | | $ | 1.92 | | | $ | 494,279 | | | | 3,055,457 | | | $ | 2.11 | | | $ | 459,175 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
-1 | The intrinsic value of an option represents the amount by which the market value of the stock exceeds the exercise price of the option of in-the-money options only. The aggregate intrinsic value is based on the closing price of Luna’s common stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market, as applicable, on the respective dates. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
At September 30, 2014, the outstanding stock options to purchase an aggregate of 4.4 million shares had a weighted average remaining contractual term of 6.3 years, and the exercisable stock options to purchase an aggregate of 3.1 million shares had a weighted average remaining contractual term of 5.0 years. | |
For each of the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, we recognized $0.3 million, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, and 2013, we recognized $0.7 million and $0.9 million, respectively, in share-based compensation expense, which is included in our selling, general and administrative expense in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. We expect to recognize $1.6 million in share-based compensation expense over the weighted average remaining service period of 1.6 years for stock options outstanding as of September 30, 2014. | |
During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, we repurchased 22,725 shares of common stock, at an average share price of $1.42 per share, pursuant to the election of the holders in order to satisfy tax withholding requirements with respect to the vesting of their respective restricted stock awards. | |
Advertising | | Advertising |
We expense the cost of advertising as incurred. Historically such amounts have not been significant to our operations. |
Income Taxes | | Income Taxes |
We account for income taxes using the liability method. Deferred tax assets or liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities as measured by the enacted tax rates which will be in effect when the differences reverse. A valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets is provided unless we conclude it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized. |
We recognize tax benefits from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by taxing authorities. |
Unaudited Interim Financial Information | Unaudited Interim Financial Information | |
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United Stated of America (“U.S. GAAP”) and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for annual financial statements. The unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the annual financial statements and in the opinion of management reflect all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring accruals considered necessary to present fairly our financial position at September 30, 2014, results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, and cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2014. |
The consolidated interim financial statements, including our significant accounting policies, should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2013, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 10, 2014 and amended on April 15, 2014. |
Reclassifications | Reclassifications | |
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. |
Accounting Renouncements | Accounting Renouncements | |
The FASB issued ASU 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” clarifying the method used to determine the timing and requirements for revenue recognition on the statements of income. Under the new standard, an entity must identify the performance obligations in a contract, the transaction price and allocate the price to specific performance obligations to recognize the revenue when the obligation is completed. The amendments in this update also require disclosure of sufficient information to allow users to understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flow arising from contracts. The new accounting guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Luna is analyzing the impact of this new standard and, at this time, cannot estimate the impact of adoption on revenue or net income. Luna plans to adopt ASU 2014-09 effective January 1, 2017. |