Significant Accounting Policies | Significant Accounting Policies (a) Principles of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all of its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. (b) Use of Estimates The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results are likely to differ from those estimates, and such differences may be material to the consolidated financial statements. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include intangibles and long-lived assets, stock compensation, deferred tax asset valuation, accounts receivable, inventory and warrant liability. (c) Cash and Cash Equivalents The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a remaining maturity at date of purchase of three months or less to be cash equivalents. (d) Restricted Cash The Company entered into irrevocable letters of credit with three banks to secure obligations under lease agreements and performance based obligations. These letters of credit total $930 and $871 and are recorded in restricted cash on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 , respectively. (e) Accounts Receivable The Company generally extends credit to certain customers without requiring collateral. The Company provides an allowance for doubtful accounts based on management's evaluation of the collectability of accounts receivable. Accounts receivable are written off when it is determined amounts are uncollectible. The recorded allowance for doubtful accounts was $479 and $630 as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 , respectively. Accounts receivable of $482 and $141 were written off during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 , respectively. (f) Inventory Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market, net of any allowances. Charges for obsolete inventory are based on specific identification of obsolete inventory items and an analysis of inventory items approaching expiration date. We record estimated obsolescence charges to cost of sales. The Company's inventories are stated using the weighted average cost approach, which approximates actual costs. (g) Fair Value Measurements The carrying amounts of the Company's financial instruments, which primarily include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximate their fair values due to their short maturities. The fair value of the Company's long-term debt is estimated by management to approximate $40,500 at December 31, 2016. At December 31, 2015, the carrying value of the Company’s debt approximated fair value based on the borrowing rates available to the Company at that time. Management's estimates are based on comparisons of the characteristics of the Company's obligations, comparable ranges of interest rates on recently issued debt, and maturity. Such valuation inputs are considered a Level 3 measurement in the fair value valuation hierarchy. The accounting guidance defines fair value, establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure for each major asset and liability category measured at fair value on either a recurring or nonrecurring basis. Fair value is defined as an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, the accounting guidance establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows: Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2: Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and Level 3: Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions. The Company issued preferred stock and common stock warrants in connection with the senior-secured credit facility (see note (10)(a)) and convertible notes to a consortium of lenders (see note (10)(b)). As discussed in notes 10 and 11, these warrants were converted to common stock, or in the case of the common stock warrants in connection with the senior-secured credit facility, were reissued and reclassified as equity. Prior to the Merger, these warrants had "down-round" price protection and were recorded as a warrant liability and re-measured on the Company's reporting date at fair value. The fair value of the warrants, classified within the Level 3 designation, was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and was affected by changes in inputs to that model including our stock price, expected stock price volatility, the contractual term, and the risk-free interest rate. Year Ended December 31, 2016 2015 Carrying Level 3 Carrying Level 3 Warrants classified as a liability $ — $ — $ 2,912 $ 2,912 (h) Property and Equipment Property and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, except for leasehold improvements, which are depreciated straight-line over the shorter of the estimated useful life or the life of the lease. Major renewals and betterments are capitalized. Validation costs (including materials and labor) that are required to bring the machinery to working condition are capitalized. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance and minor replacements are charged to expense as incurred. (i) Business Combinations Assets acquired and liabilities assumed as part of a business acquisition are recorded at their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition. The excess of purchase price over the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed is recorded as goodwill. Determining fair value of identifiable assets, particularly intangibles, and liabilities acquired also requires management to make estimates, which are based on all available information and, in some cases, assumptions with respect to the timing and amount of future revenue and expenses associated with an asset. (j) Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets Goodwill is not amortized but is tested annually for impairment or more frequently if impairment indicators exist. The Company adopted accounting guidance related to annual and interim goodwill impairment tests which allows the Company to first assess qualitative factors before performing a quantitative assessment of the fair value of a reporting unit. If it is determined on the basis of qualitative factors that the fair value of the reporting unit is more likely than not less than the carrying amount, a quantitative impairment test is required. The Company's evaluation of goodwill completed on December 31, 2016 and 2015 resulted in no impairment losses. Definite-lived intangible assets consist of customer relationships, product technology, trade names, patents and trademarks and capitalized software which are amortized over their estimated useful lives. Costs to extend the lives of and renew patents and trademarks are capitalized when incurred. (k) Valuation of Long-Lived Assets Long-lived assets, including definite-lived intangible assets, are monitored and reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of any such asset may not be recoverable. The determination of recoverability is based on an estimate of undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of an asset and its eventual disposition. The estimate of undiscounted cash flows is based upon, among other things, certain assumptions about expected future operating performance. The Company's estimates of undiscounted cash flows may differ from actual cash flows. If the sum of the undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying value of the asset, an impairment charge is recognized, measured as the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the asset. No impairment losses were recorded during the years December 31, 2016 and 2015 . (l) Revenue Recognition The Company's principal source of revenue is from the sale of its products. Revenue is recognized when evidence of an arrangement exists, fees are fixed or determinable, collection of the fees is reasonably assured, and delivery or customer acceptance of the product has occurred and no other significant obligations remain. Generally, these conditions are met under the Company's agreements with most customers upon product shipment. The Company accounts for taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities on a net basis. Accordingly, such amounts are excluded from revenues. Prior to the transition of the international commercial operations (refer to note 3(c)), the Company recognized license fee revenue paid by Allergan on a net basis. Customers generally have the right to return products purchased from the Company for up to three months from the date of product shipment or exchange products within six months. At the end of each period end, the Company determines the extent to which its revenues need to be reduced to account for expected returns and exchanges and a reserve is recorded against revenue recognized. Amounts billed to customers related to shipping and handling are included in revenues. Shipping and handling costs related to revenue producing activities are included in cost of goods sold. (m) Research and Development Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. (n) Stock-based Compensation Plans The Company recognizes compensation costs for all stock-based awards based upon each award's estimated fair value as determined on the date of grant. The Company utilizes the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair value of stock option awards. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model requires management to make various assumptions, including valuing the Company's common stock which was done by an independent valuation firm using a blend of an income approach, market approach and cost approach before the Company became public on December 29, 2016. Compensation cost is recognized on a straight-line basis over the respective vesting period of the award, net of an estimated forfeiture rate. Adjustments for actual forfeitures are made in the period which they occur. (o) Advertising The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. The Company incurred approximately $3,484 and $2,319 in advertising costs during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 , respectively. (p) Income Taxes The Company accounts for deferred income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred income taxes arise from temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements, which will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future. Temporary differences are then measured using the enacted tax rates and laws. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is more-likely than-not to be realized. Determining the appropriate amount of valuation allowance requires management to exercise judgment about future operations. In the ordinary course of business, there are many transactions for which the ultimate tax outcome is uncertain. The Company regularly assesses uncertain tax positions in each of the tax jurisdictions in which it has operations and accounts for the related consolidated financial statement implications. The amount of unrecognized tax benefits is adjusted when information becomes available or when an event occurs indicating a change is appropriate. The Company includes interest and penalties related to its uncertain tax positions as part of income tax expense. (q) Medical Device Excise Tax Effective as of January 1, 2013, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act, imposed a medical device excise tax (MDET) of 2.3% on any entity that manufactures or imports certain medical devices offered for sale in the United States. The Company accounts for the MDET as a component of sales and marketing expense within operating expense and recognized approximately zero and $754 during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 , respectively. In December 2015, the medical device tax was suspended for two years and thus no tax was imposed during 2016 or will be imposed during 2017 . (r) Foreign Currency The Company is exposed to foreign currency exchange risk as foreign subsidiaries generally operate and utilize functional currencies in local currencies other than the U.S. Dollar, which is the Company's reporting currency. The Company translates their foreign assets and liabilities at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet dates, and the revenues and expenses using average rates during the year. The resulting foreign currency translation adjustments are recorded as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. We do not hedge foreign currency translation risk in the net assets and income we report from these sources. Exchange rate fluctuations on short-term intercompany loans are included in other expense in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss. (s) Recent Accounting Pronouncements In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers ("ASU 2014-09"), which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. ASU 2014-09 replaces most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP. In July 2015, the FASB approved a one-year deferral of this standard, with a revised effective date for annual and interim reporting in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. In March 2016 and April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net ) and ASU 2016-10, Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing , respectively. ASU 2014-09 permits the use of either the retrospective or modified retrospective (cumulative effect) transition method. The Company has not yet completed its final review of the impact of this guidance, although the Company does not anticipate a material impact on its revenue recognition practices. The Company continues to review this guidance, potential disclosures and the Company’s method of adoption to complete its evaluation of the impact on its consolidated financial statements. In addition, the Company continues to monitor additional changes, modifications, clarifications or interpretations being undertaken by the FASB, which may impact the Company’s current conclusions. Apollo has adopted the provisions of ASU 2014-15, Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern ("ASU 2014-15"). This ASU requires management to evaluate, for each annual and interim reporting period, whether there are conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. If substantial doubt is raised, additional disclosures around management's plan to alleviate these doubts are required. The adoption of ASU 2014-15 resulted in no material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. Apollo has adopted the provisions of ASU 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs . This update requires that debt issuance costs be presented in the balance sheet as a reduction of the carrying value of the debt instead of being classified as a deferred charge. As retrospective application is required by this standard, December 31, 2016 and 2015 have been adjusted with no material impact, respectively. In July 2015, the FASB, issued ASU 2015-11, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory ("ASU 2015-11"), which simplifies the subsequent measurement of inventory by requiring inventory to be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. ASU 2015-11 will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2017. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2015-11 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes ("ASU 2015-17") which requires that all deferred tax assets and liabilities, along with any related valuation allowance, be classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet. ASU 2015-17 will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2017. The adoption of ASU 2015-17 will not have a material impact on the presentation of the Company's consolidated balance sheet. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases ("ASU 2016-02") which requires a lessee to recognize assets and liabilities for leases with a maximum possible term of more than 12 months. A lessee would recognize a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the leased asset (the underlying asset) for the lease term which will require companies to recognize most leases on the balance sheet, thereby increasing reported assets and liabilities. Extensive quantitative and qualitative disclosures, including significant judgments made by management, will be required. ASU 2016-02 requires adoption using a modified retrospective transition with application of the guidance at the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented. ASU 2016-02 will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU 2016-02 will have on its consolidated financial statements. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting ("ASU 2016-09"), which contains guidance on accounting for certain aspects of share-based payments to employees. ASU 2016-09 requires excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies to be recorded in the income statement when the awards vest or are settled. Furthermore, cash flows related to excess tax benefits will no longer be separately classified as a financing activity apart from other income tax cash flows. ASU 2016-09 also allows companies to repurchase more of an employee's shares for tax withholding purposes without triggering liability accounting, clarifying that all cash payments made on an employee's behalf for withheld shares should be presented as a financing activity in the consolidated statements of cash flows and provides an accounting policy election to account for forfeitures as they occur. ASU 2016-09 will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2017. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-09 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. The Company adopted the provisions of ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments ("ASU 2016-15") which addresses questions about the presentation and classification of certain cash receipts and payments in the statement of cash flows, including debt prepayment costs. The adoption of ASU 2016-15 resulted in no material impact to the Company's consolidated financial statements for the periods presented. The Company adopted the provisions of ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows: Restricted Cash ("ASU 2016-18") which clarifies the classification and presentation of changes in restricted cash on the statement of cash flows. With the adoption of ASU 2016-18 restricted cash is now included in the statement of cash flows. In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations: Clarifying the Definition of a Business ("ASU 2017-01") which changes the definition of a business. If substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets, then the acquisition is not a business. ASU 2017-01 requires a business to include at least one substantive process. ASU 2017-01 will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The effect of ASU 2017-01 on the Company's consolidated financial statements will be dependent on any future acquisitions. In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other: Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment (“ASU 2017-04”) to simplify the accounting for goodwill impairment. The guidance removes Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test, which requires a hypothetical purchase price allocation. A goodwill impairment will now be the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. Entities will continue to have the option to perform a qualitative assessment to determine if a quantitative impairment test is necessary. ASU 2017-04 will be effective for the Company for annual and interim reporting in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2017-04 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. |