Accounting Policies | 3 Months Ended |
Mar. 31, 2014 |
Notes | ' |
Accounting Policies | ' |
1. Business |
|
Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund V (the “Partnership”) is a limited partnership organized in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in May 2003. The Partnership offered for sale up to 1,250,000 units of the limited partnership at the purchase price of $20 per unit (the “offering”). The Partnership reached the minimum amount in escrow and commenced operations on March 14, 2005. As of February 24, 2006, the Partnership was fully subscribed. |
The Partnership used the proceeds of the offering to acquire, own and lease various types of information technology, medical technology, telecommunications technology, inventory management equipment and other similar capital equipment, which is leased primarily to U.S. corporations and institutions. |
Commonwealth Capital Corp. (“CCC”), on behalf of the Partnership and other affiliated partnerships, acquires equipment subject to associated debt obligations and lease agreements and allocate a participation in the cost, debt and lease revenue to the various partnerships that it manages based on certain risk factors. |
The Partnership’s investment objective is to acquire primarily high technology equipment. Information technology has developed rapidly in recent years and is expected to continue to do so. Technological advances have permitted reductions in the cost of information technology processing capacity, speed, and utility. In the future, the rate and nature of equipment development may cause equipment to become obsolete more rapidly. The Partnership also acquires high technology medical, telecommunications and inventory management equipment. The Partnership’s general partner will seek to maintain an appropriate balance and diversity in the types of equipment acquired. The market for high technology medical equipment is growing each year. Generally, this type of equipment will have a longer useful life than other types of technology equipment. This allows for increased re-marketability, if it is returned before its economic or announcement cycle is depleted. |
The Partnership’s General Partner is Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund, Inc. (the “General Partner”), a Pennsylvania corporation which is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of CCC. Approximately ten years after the commencement of operations, the Partnership intends to sell or otherwise dispose of all of its equipment, make final distributions to partners, and to dissolve. Unless sooner terminated, the Partnership will continue until February 4, 2017. |
The General Partner continues to suspend distributions, as part of an aggressive work out plan of reinvestment and recovery for lost equity experienced during the litigation process with Mobile Pro/City of Tempe. The General Partner will reassess the funding of limited partner distributions on a quarterly basis, throughout 2014. |
The General Partner and CCC will also determine if related party payables owed to them by the Partnership may be deferred (if deemed necessary) in an effort to increase the Partnership’s cash flow. |
The General Partner and CCC have committed to fund, either through cash contributions and/or forgiveness of indebtedness, any necessary operational cash shortfalls of the Partnership through March 31, 2015. The General Partner will continue to reassess the funding of limited partner distributions throughout 2014 and will continue to waive certain fees if the General Partner determines it is in the best interest of the Partnership to do so. If available cash flow or net disposition proceeds are insufficient to cover the Partnership expenses and liabilities on a short and long term basis, the Partnership may attempt to obtain additional funds by disposing of or refinancing equipment, or by borrowing within its permissible limits. |
|
|
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
|
Basis of Presentation |
The financial information presented as of any date other than December 31, 2013 has been prepared from the books and records without audit. Financial information as of December 31, 2013 has been derived from the audited financial statements of the Partnership, but does not include all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles to be included in audited financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial information for the periods indicated, have been included. For further information regarding the Partnership’s accounting policies, refer to the financial statements and related notes included in the Partnership’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of financial results that may be expected for the full year ended December 31, 2014. |
Disclosure of Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
Estimated fair value was determined by management using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. However, judgment was necessary to interpret marker data and develop estimated fair value. Cash, receivables, accounts payable and accrued expenses and other liabilities are carried at amounts which reasonably approximate the fair values as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 due to the immediate or short-term nature of these financial instruments. |
|
The Partnership’s long-term debt consists of notes payable, which are secured by specific computer equipment and are nonrecourse liabilities of the Partnership. The estimated fair value of this debt at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 approximates the carrying value of these instruments, due to the interest rates on this debt approximating current market values. The Partnership classifies the fair value of its notes payable within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy based on the observable inputs used to estimate fair value. |
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
We consider cash and cash equivalents to be cash on hand and highly liquid investments with the original maturity dates of 90 days or less. |
At March 31, 2014, cash was held in three bank accounts maintained at one financial institution with an aggregate balance of approximately $20,000. Bank accounts are federally insured up to $250,000 by the FDIC. At March 31, 2014, the total cash bank balance was as follows: |
|
| Balance at March 31, | | | 2014 | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total bank balance | | $ | 20,000 | | | | | | | | | | | |
| FDIC insured | | | -20,000 | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Uninsured amount | | $ | 0 | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
The Partnership’s bank balances are fully insured by the FDIC. The Partnership deposits its funds with a Moody's Aaa-Rated banking institution which is one of only three Aaa-Rated banks listed on the New York Stock Exchange. The Partnership has not experienced any losses in such accounts, and believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk. The amount in such accounts will fluctuate throughout 2014 due to many factors, including cash receipts, interest rates and equipment acquisitions. |
|
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08 (“ASU Updated 2014-08”), Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity. This ASU provides guidance on the change in criteria established to enhance the presentation of reporting discontinued operations. The guidance is effective for annual financial statements beginning on or after December 15, 2014 that report discontinued operations or disposals of components of an entity. The Partnership is currently evaluating the effect that this ASU will have on its financial statements. |
In March 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-06 (“ASU Updated 2014-06”), Technical Corrections and Improvements Related to Glossary Terms. This ASU provides updates to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification established in September 2009 as the source of authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB. The update is effectively immediately upon issuance. The Partnership adopted this ASU during the first quarter of 2014 and there was no material impact on its financial statements. |
In April 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-07 (“ASU Updated 2013-07”), Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205): Liquidation Basis of Accounting. This ASU provides guidance on the application of the liquidation basis of accounting as provided by U.S. GAAP. The guidance will improve the consistency of financial reporting for liquidating entities. The guidance in this ASU is effective for entities that determine liquidation is imminent during annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013, and interim reporting periods therein. The Partnership is currently evaluating the effect that this ASU will have on its financial statements during the liquidation phase of its life cycle. |
|
|
3. Information Technology, Medical Technology, Telecommunications Technology, Inventory Management Equipment (“Equipment”) |
The Partnership is the lessor of equipment under leases with periods that generally will range from 12 to 48 months. In general, associated costs such as repairs and maintenance, insurance and property taxes are paid by the lessee. |
Remarketing fees will be paid to the leasing companies from which the Partnership purchases leases. These are fees that are earned by the leasing companies when the initial terms of the lease have been met. The General Partner believes that this strategy adds value since it entices the leasing company to remain actively involved with the lessees for potential extensions, remarketing or sale of equipment. This strategy is designed to minimize any conflicts the leasing company may have with a new lessee and may assist in maximizing overall portfolio performance. The remarketing fee is tied into lease performance thresholds and is a factor in the negotiation of the fee. Remarketing fees incurred in connection with lease extensions are accounted for as operating costs. Remarketing fees incurred in connection with the sale of equipment are included in the gain or loss calculations. For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, remarketing fees were incurred in the amounts of approximately $0 and 15,000. For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, approximately $0 and $0 of remarketing fees were paid with cash or netted against receivables due from such parties, respectively. |
CCC, on behalf of the Partnership and other affiliated partnerships, acquires equipment subject to associated debt obligations and lease agreements and allocates a participation in the cost, debt and lease revenue through a transfer or sale and assignment to the various partnerships based on certain risk factors. |
The Partnership’s share of the cost of the equipment in which it participates with other partnerships at March 31, 2014 was approximately $5,214,000 and is included in the fixed assets on its balance sheet. The Partnership’s share of the outstanding debt associated with this equipment at March 31, 2014 was approximately $639,000 and is included in the Partnership’s notes payable on its balance sheet. The total cost of the equipment shared by the Partnership with other partnerships at March 31, 2014was approximately $13,400,000. The total outstanding debt related to the equipment shared by the Partnership at March 31, 2014 was approximately $1,886,000. |
The Partnership’s share of the cost of the equipment in which it participates with other partnerships at December 31, 2013 was approximately $5,290,000 and is included in the fixed assets on its balance sheet. The Partnership’s share of the outstanding debt associated with this equipment at December 31, 2013 was approximately $688,000 and is included in the Partnership’s notes payable on its balance sheet. The total cost of the equipment shared by the Partnership with other partnerships at December 31, 2013 was approximately $13,546,000. The total outstanding debt related to the equipment shared by the Partnership at December 31, 2013 was approximately $1,814,000. |
As the Partnership and the other programs managed by the General Partner continue to acquire new equipment for the portfolio, opportunities for shared participation are expected to continue. Sharing in the acquisition of a lease portfolio gives the fund an opportunity to acquire additional assets and revenue streams, while allowing the fund to remain diversified and reducing its overall risk with respect to one portfolio. |
The following is a schedule of future minimum rentals on noncancellable operating leases at March 31, 2014: |
|
| | Amount | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Nine Months Ended December 31, 2014 | | | 748,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended December 31, 2015 | | | 456,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended December 31, 2016 | | | 171,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended December 31, 2017 | | | 5,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 1,380,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
The Partnership is scheduled to terminate on February 4, 2017. If the Partnership terminates on February 4, 2017, CCC will assume the rights to the remaining active leases and their related remaining revenue stream through their termination. |
The following lists the components of the net investment in direct financing leases at March 31, 2014: |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total minimum lease payments to be received | | $ | 41,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Estimated residual value of leased equipment (unguaranteed) | | | 5,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Less: unearned income | | | -6,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment in direct finance leases | | $ | 40,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Our finance lease customers operate in various industries, and we have no significant customer concentration in any one industry. We assess credit risk for all of our customers, including those that lease under finance leases. This credit risk is assessed using an internally developed model which incorporates credits scores from third party providers and our own customer risk ratings and is periodically reviewed. Our internal ratings are weighted based on the industry that the customer operates in. Factors taken into consideration when assessing risk includes both general and industry specific qualitative and quantitative metrics. We separately take in to consideration payment history, open lawsuits, liens and judgments. Typically, we will not extend credit to a company that has been in business for less than 5 years or that has filed for bankruptcy within the same period. Our internally based model may classify a company as high risk based on our analysis of their audited financial statements. Additional considerations of high risk may include history of late payments, open lawsuits and liens or judgments. In an effort to mitigate risk, we typically require deposits from those in this category. The following table presents the credit risk profile, by creditworthiness category, of our finance lease receivables at March 31, 2014: |
|
Risk Level | | Percent of Total | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Low | | | 0 | % | | | | | | | | | | | |
Moderate-Low | | | 100 | % | | | | | | | | | | | |
Moderate | | | 0 | % | | | | | | | | | | | |
Moderate-High | | | 0 | % | | | | | | | | | | | |
High | | | 0 | % | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net finance lease receivable | | | 100 | % | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
As of March 31, 2014, we determined that we did not have a need for an allowance for uncollectible accounts associated with any of our finance leases, as the customer payment histories with us, associated with these leases, has been positive, with no late payments. |
The following is a schedule of future minimum rentals on noncancelable direct financing leases at March 31, 2014: |
|
| | Amount | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Nine months ended December 31, 2014 | | | 9,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended December 31, 2015 | | | 12,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended December 31, 2016 | | | 12,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended December 31, 2017 | | | 7,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended December 31, 2018 | | | 1,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 41,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
The Partnership is scheduled to terminate on February 4, 2017. If the Partnership terminates on February 4, 2017, CCC will assume the rights to the remaining active leases and their related remaining revenue stream through their termination. |
|
|
4. Related Party Transactions |
|
During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Partnership recorded a receivable from CCC of approximately $47,000, related to the SEC settlement as disclosed in Note 7. As of March 31, 2014, the balance of this receivable is approximately $24,000. |
|
As of March 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company’s related party receivables and payables are short term, unsecured and non-interest bearing. |
Three months ended March 31, | | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
Reimbursable expenses | | | | | | |
The General Partner and its affiliates are entitled to reimbursement by the Partnership for the cost of goods, supplies or services obtained and used by the General Partner in connection with the administration and operation of the Partnership from third parties unaffiliated with the General Partner. In addition, the General Partner and its affiliates are entitled to reimbursement of certain expenses incurred by the General Partner and its affiliates in connection with the administration and operation of the Partnership. For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, the General Partner waived certain reimbursable expenses due to it by the Partnership. | | $ | 63,000 | | | $ | 48,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Equipment acquisition fee | | | | | | | | |
The General Partner earned an equipment acquisition fee of 4% of the purchase price of each item of equipment purchased as compensation for the negotiation of the acquisition of the equipment and lease thereof or sale under a conditional sales contract. At March 31, 2014, all prepaid equipment acquisition fees were earned by the General Partner. For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, approximately $3,000 and $2,000 of acquisition fees were waived by the General Partner. | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | |
Equipment liquidation fee | | | | | | | |
With respect to each item of equipment sold by the General Partner (other than in connection with a conditional sales contract), a fee equal to the lesser of (i) 50% of the competitive equipment sale commission or (ii) three percent of the sales price for such equipment is payable to the General Partner. The payment of such fee is subordinated to the receipt by the limited partners of (i) a return of their net capital contributions and a 10% per annum cumulative return, compounded daily, on adjusted capital contribution and (ii) the net disposition proceeds from such sale in accordance with the Partnership Agreement. Such fee will be reduced to the extent any liquidation of resale fees are paid to unaffiliated parties. For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, approximately $0 and $100 of equipment liquidation fees were waived by the General Partner, respectively. | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Debt placement fee | | | | | | | |
As compensation for arranging term debt to finance the acquisition of equipment to the Partnership, a fee equal to one percent of such indebtedness; provided, however, that such fee is reduced to the extent the Partnership incurs such fees to third parties, unaffiliated with the General Partner or the lender, with respect to such indebtedness and no such fee is paid with respect to borrowings from the General Partner or its affiliates. For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, approximately $1,000 and $2,000 of debt placement fees were waived by the General Partner. | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 |
Equipment management fee | | | | | | |
The General Partner is entitled to be paid for managing the equipment portfolio a monthly fee equal to the lesser of (i) the fees which would be charged by an independent third party for similar services for similar equipment or (ii) the sum of (a) two percent of (1) the gross lease revenues attributable to equipment which is subject to full payout net leases which contain net lease provisions plus (2) the purchase price paid on conditional sales contracts as received by the Partnership and (b) 5% of the gross lease revenues attributable to equipment which is subject to operating leases. In an effort to increase future cash flow for the fund our General Partner had elected to reduce the percentage of equipment management fees paid to it from 5% to 2.5% of the gross lease revenues attributable to equipment which is subject to operating leases. The reduction was effective beginning in July 2010 and remained in effect for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013. | | $ | 7,000 | | | $ | 8,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |