Exhibit 99.2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6ab8/b6ab8988a288d052b0ef6b2056e19070a4809561" alt="LOGO"
| | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33ebe/33ebed58e636b55c50d465433ab27acce53d780b" alt="LOGO" | | Index to Supplemental Information |
| | | | |
| | Page | |
Company Information | | | 2 | |
Portfolio Maps | | | 3 | |
Earnings Release | | | 4 | |
Consolidated Statements of Operations | | | 12 | |
Consolidated Balance Sheets | | | 15 | |
Net Operating Income (NOI) Same-Property Analysis | | | 16 | |
Highlights | | | 17 | |
Quarterly Financial Results and Measures | | | 18 | |
Capitalization and Selected Ratios | | | 20 | |
Outstanding Debt | | | 21 | |
Debt Maturity Schedule | | | 22 | |
Selected Debt Covenants | | | 23 | |
Net Asset Value Analysis | | | 24 | |
Investment in Joint Ventures | | | 25 | |
Portfolio Summary | | | 26 | |
Leasing and Occupancy Summary | | | 27 | |
Portfolio by Size | | | 28 | |
Top Twenty-Five Tenants | | | 29 | |
Annual Lease Expirations | | | 30 | |
Quarterly Lease Expirations | | | 31 | |
Leasing Analysis | | | 32 | |
Retention Summary | | | 33 | |
Office Properties | | | 34 | |
Business Park / Industrial Properties | | | 35 | |
Management Statements on Non-GAAP Supplemental Measures | | | 36 | |
| | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33ebe/33ebed58e636b55c50d465433ab27acce53d780b" alt="LOGO" | | Company Information |
First Potomac Realty Trust is a leader in the ownership, management, development and redevelopment of office and business park properties in the greater Washington, DC region. The Company’s focus is on acquiring properties that can benefit from its intensive property management, and repositioning properties to increase their profitability and value.
| | |
Corporate Headquarters | | 7600 Wisconsin Avenue |
| | 11th Floor |
| | Bethesda, MD 20814 |
| |
New York Stock Exchange | | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2dc70/2dc708662689befb8c54f0b3fe81527cb9d6043a" alt="LOGO"
|
| |
| |
Website | | www.first-potomac.com |
| |
Investor Relations | | Jaime N. Marcus |
| | Manager, Investor Relations |
| | (301) 986-9200 |
| | jmarcus@first-potomac.com |
The forward-looking statements contained in this supplemental financial information are subject to various risks and uncertainties. Although the Company believes the expectations reflected in any forward-looking statements contained herein are based on reasonable assumptions, there can be no assurance that its expectations will be achieved. Certain factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the Company’s expectations include changes in general or regional economic conditions; the Company’s ability to timely lease or re-lease space at current or anticipated rents; changes in interest rates; changes in operating costs; the Company’s ability to complete acquisitions and, if applicable, dispositions on acceptable terms; the Company’s ability to manage its current debt levels and repay or refinance its indebtedness upon maturity or other required payment dates; the Company’s ability to maintain financial covenant compliance under its debt agreements; the Company’s ability to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures; any impact of the informal inquiry initiated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”); the Company’s ability to obtain debt and/or financing on attractive terms, or at all; changes in the assumptions underlying the Company’s earnings and Core FFO guidance and other risks detailed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and described from time to time in the Company’s filings with the SEC. Many of these factors are beyond the Company’s ability to control or predict. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance. For forward-looking statements herein, the Company claims the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Company assumes no obligation to update or supplement forward-looking statements that become untrue because of subsequent events.
Note that certain figures are rounded to the nearest thousands or to a tenth of a percent throughout the document, which may impact footing and/or crossfooting of totals and subtotals.
2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b42c2/b42c26b84491b007d17b840ba9d7c35a3ef324b1" alt="LOGO"
3
| | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33ebe/33ebed58e636b55c50d465433ab27acce53d780b" alt="LOGO" | | Earnings Release |
| | | | |
CONTACT: Jaime N. Marcus | | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dac6e/dac6e986cb061d3ac12c49b6f6a7c370951dfcc7" alt="LOGO" | | First Potomac Realty Trust 7600 Wisconsin Avenue |
Manager, Investor Relations | | | 11th Floor |
(301) 986-9200 jmarcus@first-potomac.com | | | Bethesda, MD 20814 www.first-potomac.com |
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
FIRST POTOMAC REALTY TRUST REPORTS
THIRD QUARTER 2013 RESULTS
Executed 300,000 Square Feet of Leases Bringing the Portfolio to 87.4% Leased
BETHESDA, MD. (October 24, 2013) – First Potomac Realty Trust (NYSE: FPO), a leader in the ownership, management, development and redevelopment of office and business park properties in the greater Washington, D.C. region, reported results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013.
Third Quarter 2013 and Subsequent Highlights
• | | Reported Core Funds From Operations of $13.5 million, or $0.22 per diluted share. |
• | | Executed 300,000 square feet of leases, including 213,000 square feet of new leases, bringing total new leasing for the year to 666,000 square feet. |
• | | Increased leased percentage from 84.9% in the third quarter of 2012 to 87.4% and brought occupancy up from 83.2% to 85.1%. |
• | | Same-property net operating income increased by 3.7% on an accrual basis and 2.3% on a cash basis. |
• | | Sold 4200 Tech Court, a 34,000 square foot single-story office building and Triangle Business Center, a 74,000 square foot single-story business park, for net proceeds of $3.2 million and $2.7 million, respectively. |
• | | On October 1, acquired 540 Gaither Road, the third multi-story office building at Redland Corporate Center, in Rockville, Maryland, for $30 million, which completes the Company’s ownership of the complex. |
• | | On October 16, amended the unsecured revolving credit facility and unsecured term loans to increase borrowing capacity, extend the maturity, and reduce LIBOR spreads for each. |
Douglas J. Donatelli, Chairman and CEO of First Potomac Realty Trust, stated, “Over the last three quarters, we have made significant progress executing on the strategic and capital plan we laid out earlier this year. We continued to improve the operating metrics of our portfolio, increased our sequential occupancy by 110 basis points, and delivered our seventh consecutive quarter of positive net absorption in a very challenging D.C. market. Subsequent to quarter end, we completed our first acquisition since late 2011 with the third building at Redland Corporate Center, and demonstrated our commitment to high-quality, multi-story office assets in strong submarkets where we have an existing presence. We are pleased with the positive steps we have taken, and are working diligently to position First Potomac as the preeminent owner of quality office properties in the greater Washington D.C. region.”
Funds From Operations (“FFO”) decreased for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared with the same period in 2012 due to a reduction in net operating income as a result of the sale of the majority of the Company’s industrial properties in June 2013, increased personnel separation costs, and a non-recurring non-cash gain of $4.3 million recorded in the third quarter of 2012 as a result of changed tax regulations. The decrease in FFO for the third quarter of 2013 was partially offset by a 3.7% increase in same-property net operating income compared with the third quarter of 2012.
4
| | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33ebe/33ebed58e636b55c50d465433ab27acce53d780b" alt="LOGO" | | Earnings Release - Continued |
FFO increased for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared with the same period in 2012 primarily due to lower debt extinguishment costs and reduced legal and accounting fees, which were partially offset by a reduction in net operating income as a result of the sale of the majority of the Company’s industrial properties, the operations of which are presented in discontinued operations. During the second quarter of 2012, the Company recorded $13.2 million of debt extinguishment charges from the prepayment of its senior notes compared with $4.7 million of debt extinguishment costs incurred in 2013 primarily associated with the repayment of debt in conjunction with property dispositions. FFO also increased for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 due to a 1.7% increase in same property net operating income.
Core FFO decreased for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared with the same periods in 2012, primarily due to a decline in net operating income as a result of the sale of the majority of the Company’s industrial properties in June 2013, the operations of which are presented in discontinued operations.
A reconciliation between Core FFO and FFO available to common shareholders for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 is presented below (in thousands, except per share amounts):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| | Amount | | | Per diluted share(1) | | | Amount | | | Per diluted share(1) | | | Amount | | | Per diluted share(1) | | | Amount | | | Per diluted share(1) | |
Core FFO | | $ | 13,524 | | | $ | 0.22 | | | $ | 15,297 | | | $ | 0.29 | | | $ | 45,257 | | | $ | 0.80 | | | $ | 46,779 | | | $ | 0.88 | |
Loss on debt extinguishment | | | (123 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (4,738 | ) | | | (0.08 | ) | | | (13,325 | ) | | | (0.25 | ) |
Internal investigation costs | | | — | | | | — | | | | (743 | ) | | | (0.01 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (3,276 | ) | | | (0.06 | ) |
Deferred abatement and straight-line amortization(2) | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,567 | | | | 0.03 | | | | 1,567 | | | | 0.03 | | | | 1,567 | | | | 0.03 | |
Acquisition costs | | | (173 | ) | | | — | | | | (8 | ) | | | — | | | | (173 | ) | | | — | | | | (49 | ) | | | — | |
Change in tax regulation(3) | | | — | | | | — | | | | 4,327 | | | | 0.08 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 4,327 | | | | 0.08 | |
Personnel separation costs | | | (1,777 | ) | | | (0.03 | ) | | | (397 | ) | | | (0.01 | ) | | | (1,777 | ) | | | (0.03 | ) | | | (397 | ) | | | (0.01 | ) |
Contingent consideration related to acquisition of property(4) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (112 | ) | | | — | | | | (75 | ) | | | — | | | | (112 | ) | | | — | |
Legal costs associated with informal SEC inquiry | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (391 | ) | | | (0.01 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
FFO available to common shareholders | | $ | 11,451 | | | $ | 0.19 | | | $ | 19,931 | | | $ | 0.38 | | | $ | 39,670 | | | $ | 0.70 | | | $ | 35,514 | | | $ | 0.67 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net (loss) income | | $ | (1,717 | ) | | | | | | $ | 7,435 | | | | | | | $ | 14,722 | | | | | | | $ | (9,261 | ) | | | | |
Net (loss) income attributable to common shareholders per diluted common share(5) | | $ | (0.08 | ) | | | | | | $ | 0.08 | | | | | | | $ | 0.09 | | | | | | | $ | (0.35 | ) | | | | |
(1) | Numbers may not foot due to rounding. |
(2) | Represents the accelerated amortization of the straight-line balance and the deferred abatement for Engineering Solutions at I-66 Commerce Center, which terminated its lease prior to completion. The tenant vacated the property at the end of March 2013. The property was sold in May 2013. |
(3) | Reflects the one-time non-cash impact of changed tax regulations enacted by the District of Columbia that became effective in September 2012. |
(4) | Reflects an increase in the Company’s contingent consideration liability related to its acquisition of Ashburn Center in 2009. The Company paid $1.7 million to the seller of the property in the third quarter of 2013 to fulfill the obligation. |
(5) | Reflects amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests and the impact of dividends on the Company’s preferred shares to arrive at net (loss) income attributable to common shareholders. |
A reconciliation of net (loss) income to FFO available to common shareholders and Core FFO, as well as definitions and statements of purpose, are included below in the financial tables accompanying this press release and under “Non-GAAP Financial Measures,” respectively.
5
| | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33ebe/33ebed58e636b55c50d465433ab27acce53d780b" alt="LOGO" | | Earnings Release - Continued |
Operating Performance
At September 30, 2013, the Company’s consolidated portfolio consisted of 145 buildings totaling approximately 9 million square feet. The Company’s consolidated portfolio was 87.4% leased and 85.1% occupied at September 30, 2013, compared with 86.5% leased and 84.0% occupied at June 30, 2013 and 84.9% leased and 83.2% occupied at September 30, 2012, a 190 basis point occupancy increase year over year.
During the third quarter of 2013, the Company executed 300,000 square feet of leases, which consisted of 213,000 square feet of new leases and 87,000 square feet of renewal leases. The Company delivered positive net absorption of approximately 19,741 square feet, the Company’s seventh consecutive quarter of positive net absorption, and as anticipated, had a tenant retention rate of 30%, primarily as a result of over 200,000 square feet of known move outs in the third quarter.
Same-property net operating income (“Same-Property NOI”) increased 3.7% on an accrual basis for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and increased 1.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared with the same periods in 2012. The increase in Same-Property NOI in the three months ended September 30, 2013 was due to an increase in occupancy at Van Buren Office Park, Reston Business Campus, Sterling Park Business Center and Norfolk Business Center. The increase in Same-Property NOI during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was primarily a result of occupancy increases at Redland Corporate Center, Atlantic Corporate Park, Van Buren Office Park and Reston Business Campus.
A reconciliation of net (loss) income to Same-Property NOI and a definition and statement of purpose are included below in the financial tables accompanying this press release and under “Non-GAAP Financial Measures,” respectively.
A list of the Company’s properties, as well as additional information regarding the Company’s results of operations can be found in the Company’s Third Quarter 2013 Supplemental Financial Report, which is posted on the Company’s website,www.first-potomac.com.
Acquisition
On October 1, 2013, the Company acquired 540 Gaither Road (Redland I), a six-story, 134,000 square foot office building in Rockville, Maryland, for $30.0 million. The property is located within Redland Corporate Center, which is comprised of three multi-story, Class-A office buildings totaling 483,000 square feet. The Company acquired Redland II and III in a joint venture with Perseus Realty, LLC in late 2010. The newly acquired property is 100% leased to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) through early 2018. The acquisition was funded with $28.2 million of proceeds from the sale of its industrial portfolio in June 2013 that was previously placed with a qualified intermediary to facilitate a tax-free exchange, as well as available cash.
Dispositions
Consistent with the Company’s previously disclosed strategy of focusing on high-quality, multi-story office properties, the Company continued to dispose of certain non-core properties. Specifically, the Company sold 4200 Tech Court, a 34,000 square foot single-story office building located in Chantilly, Virginia, for net proceeds of approximately $3.2 million, and Triangle Business Center, a four-building, 74,000 square foot single-story business park property located in Baltimore, Maryland, for net proceeds of approximately $2.7 million. The Company reported a gain on the sale of 4200 Tech Court of $0.4 million in its third quarter results. As previously disclosed, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $1.4 million on Triangle Business Center in the second quarter of 2013.
6
| | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33ebe/33ebed58e636b55c50d465433ab27acce53d780b" alt="LOGO" | | Earnings Release - Continued |
On September 24, 2013, the Company entered into a contract to sell Worman’s Mill Court, a 40,000 square foot office building located in Frederick, Maryland. Based on the anticipated sales price, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $0.5 million in the third quarter of 2013. The sale is expected to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2013. At September 30, 2013, the Company classified the property as “held-for-sale” on its consolidated balance sheet.
The operating results and any gains on sale of 4200 Tech Court, Triangle Business Center and Worman’s Mill Court are reflected as discontinued operations in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations for each of the periods presented in this press release.
Financing Activity
On September 3, 2013, the Company repaid a $6.6 million mortgage loan that encumbered Linden Business Center with available cash.
On September 30, 2013, the Company repaid a $53.9 million mortgage loan that encumbered 840 First Street, NE, which was scheduled to mature on October 1, 2013. 840 First Street, NE is subject to a tax protection agreement, which requires that the Company maintain a specified minimum amount of debt on the property through March 2018. As a result of this requirement, simultaneously with the repayment of the mortgage debt, the Company encumbered 840 First Street, NE with a $37.3 million mortgage loan that had previously encumbered 500 First Street, NW. The transfer of the mortgage loan did not impact any material terms of the agreement. The Company incurred $0.1 million in debt extinguishment charges related to the transfer.
On October 16, 2013, the Company amended its unsecured revolving credit facility and unsecured term loan. The Company increased the size of the unsecured revolving credit facility from $255 million to $300 million and extended the maturity date of the facility to October 2017, with a one-year extension at the Company’s option. The Company divided its unsecured term loan into three $100 million tranches that mature in October 2018, 2019 and 2020, which added over two years of term from the previous maturity dates. As part of the amendments, the Company reduced its LIBOR spreads to current market rates, eliminated the prepayment lock-outs for the unsecured term loan, eliminated prepayment penalties associated with two tranches of the unsecured term loan, decreased the capitalization rates used to calculate gross asset value in the covenant calculations, and moved to a covenant package more closely aligned with the Company’s strategic plan. The Company believes the amendments to the unsecured revolving credit facility and unsecured term loan will reduce its borrowing costs and put the Company in a stronger position to deploy capital in the future.
Balance Sheet
The Company had $659.0 million of debt outstanding at September 30, 2013 compared with $688.0 million of debt outstanding at June 30, 2013. Of the Company’s outstanding debt at September 30, 2013, $232.3 million was fixed-rate debt, $350.0 million was hedged variable-rate debt, and $76.7 million was unhedged variable-rate debt.
Dividends
On October 22, 2013, the Company declared a dividend of $0.15 per common share, equating to an annualized dividend of $0.60 per common share. The dividend will be paid on November 15, 2013 to common shareholders of record as of November 6, 2013. The Company also declared a dividend of $0.484375 per share on its Series A Preferred Shares. The dividend will be paid on November 15, 2013 to preferred shareholders of record as of November 6, 2013.
7
| | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33ebe/33ebed58e636b55c50d465433ab27acce53d780b" alt="LOGO" | | Earnings Release - Continued |
Core FFO Guidance
The Company improved its full-year 2013 Core FFO guidance to $1.02 to $1.04 per diluted share. The Company’s updated guidance reflects all prior dispositions and financing activities completed during the year, as well as the acquisition of 540 Gaither Road, which was completed in the fourth quarter of 2013, and Worman’s Mill Court, which is expected to be sold in the fourth quarter of 2013. Among other things, guidance does not include the impact of any potential acquisition opportunities. The following is a summary of the assumptions that the Company used in arriving at its guidance, which were updated based on the Company’s first, second, and third quarter activity (unaudited, amounts in thousands except percentages and per share amounts):
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Expected Ranges(1) | |
Portfolio NOI(2) | | $ | 114,000 | | | | — | | | $ | 116,000 | |
Interest and Other Income | | | 6,000 | | | | — | | | | 6,500 | |
FFO from Unconsolidated Joint Ventures | | | 5,000 | | | | — | | | | 5,500 | |
Interest Expense | | $ | 34,000 | | | | — | | | $ | 35,000 | |
G&A(3) | | | 19,000 | | | | — | | | | 20,000 | |
Preferred Dividends | | | | | | | 12,400 | | | | | |
Weighted Average Shares | | | 57,500 | | | | — | | | | 58,000 | |
Year-End Occupancy | | | 85.0 | % | | | — | | | | 86.0 | % |
Same-Property NOI – Accrual Basis | | | 1.5 | % | | | — | | | | 2.5 | % |
(1) | Company’s guidance reflects the disposition of the 24 industrial properties, 4200 Tech Court, 4212 Tech Court, and Triangle Business Center, the potential sale of Worman’s Mill Court, the acquisition of 540 Gaither Road, as well as the issuance of 7,475,000 common shares during the second quarter of 2013, but does not take into consideration any additional dispositions, acquisitions or capital raising activities in 2013. The Company’s guidance also excludes any potential gains or asset impairments associated with potential future property dispositions. |
(2) | Does not include the $1.5 million straight-line amortization rent impact associated with Engineering Solutions at I-66 Commerce Center. The tenant terminated its lease at the end of March 2013 and the property was sold in May 2013. |
(3) | Excludes $1.8 million of personnel separation costs related to the departure of the Company’s former Chief Operating Officer and $0.4 million of legal costs associated with the informal SEC inquiry. |
The Company’s guidance is also based on a number of other assumptions, many of which are outside the Company’s control and all of which are subject to change. The Company may change its guidance as actual and anticipated results vary from these assumptions.
| | | | | | | | |
Guidance Range for 2013 | | Low Range | | | High Range | |
Net income attributable to common shareholders per diluted share | | $ | 0.04 | | | $ | 0.06 | |
Real estate depreciation(1) | | | 1.17 | | | | 1.17 | |
I-66 Commerce Center accelerated amortization | | | (0.03 | ) | | | (0.03 | ) |
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests and items excluded from Core FFO per diluted share(2) | | | (0.16 | ) | | | (0.16 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Core FFO per diluted share | | $ | 1.02 | | | $ | 1.04 | |
| | | | | | | | |
(1) | Includes the Company’s pro-rata share of depreciation from its unconsolidated joint ventures and depreciation related to the Company’s disposed properties. |
(2) | Items excluded from Core FFO consist of the gains associated with disposed properties, the costs associated with the informal SEC inquiry, contingent consideration, impairment charges, acquisition costs, personnel separation costs, and debt modification and extinguishment charges. |
8
| | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33ebe/33ebed58e636b55c50d465433ab27acce53d780b" alt="LOGO" | | Earnings Release - Continued |
Investor Conference Call and Webcast
First Potomac will host a conference call on October 25, 2013 at 9:00 AM ET to discuss third quarter results. The conference call can be accessed by dialing (877) 705-6003 or (201) 493-6725 for international participants. A replay of the call will be available from 12:00 Noon ET on October 25, 2013, until midnight ET on November 1, 2013. The replay can be accessed by dialing (877) 870-5176 or (858) 384-5517 for international callers, and entering pin number 10000324.
A live broadcast of the conference call will also be available online at the Company’s website, www.first-potomac.com, on October 25, 2013, beginning at 9:00 AM ET. An online replay will follow shortly after the call and will continue for 90 days.
About First Potomac Realty Trust
First Potomac Realty Trust is a self-administered, self-managed real estate investment trust that focuses on owning, operating, developing and redeveloping office and business park properties in the greater Washington, D.C. region. As of September 30, 2013, the Company’s consolidated portfolio totaled approximately 9 million square feet. Based on annualized cash basis rent, the Company’s portfolio consists of 51% office properties and 49% business park and industrial properties. A key element of First Potomac’s overarching strategy is its dedication to sustainability. Nearly one million square feet of First Potomac property is LEED Certified, with the potential for another one million square feet in future development projects. Approximately half of the portfolio’s multi-story office square footage is LEED or Energy Star Certified. FPO common shares (NYSE:FPO) and preferred shares (NYSE:FPO-PA) are publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Funds from Operations– Funds from operations (“FFO”) represents net income (computed in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”)), excluding gains (losses) on sales of real estate and impairments of real estate assets, plus real estate-related depreciation and amortization and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. The Company also excludes, from its FFO calculation, any depreciation and amortization related to third parties from its consolidated joint ventures.
The Company considers FFO a useful measure of performance for an equity REIT because it facilitates an understanding of the operating performance of its properties without giving effect to real estate depreciation and amortization, which assume that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, the Company believes that FFO provides a meaningful indication of its performance. The Company also considers FFO an appropriate performance measure given its wide use by investors and analysts. The Company computes FFO in accordance with standards established by the Board of Governors of NAREIT in its March 1995 White Paper (as amended in November 1999, April 2002 and January 2012), which may differ from the methodology for calculating FFO utilized by other equity real estate investment trusts (“REITs”) and, accordingly, may not be comparable to such other REITs. Further, FFO does not represent amounts available for management’s discretionary use because of needed capital replacement or expansion, debt service obligations or other commitments and uncertainties, nor is it indicative of funds available to fund the Company’s cash needs, including its ability to make distributions. The Company presents FFO per diluted share calculations that are based on the outstanding dilutive common shares plus the outstanding Operating Partnership units for the periods presented.
Core FFO– Management believes that the computation of FFO in accordance with NAREIT’s definition includes certain items that are not indicative of the results provided by the Company’s operating portfolio and affect the comparability of the Company’s period-over-period performance. These items include, but are not limited to, gains and losses on the retirement of debt, legal and accounting costs related to the Company’s prior internal investigation and the informal SEC inquiry, personnel separations costs, contingent consideration charges and acquisition costs.
9
| | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33ebe/33ebed58e636b55c50d465433ab27acce53d780b" alt="LOGO" | | Earnings Release - Continued |
The Company’s presentation of FFO in accordance with the NAREIT white paper, or presentation of Core FFO, should not be considered as an alternative to net income (computed in accordance with GAAP) as an indicator of the Company’s financial performance or to cash flow from operating activities (computed in accordance with GAAP) as an indicator of its liquidity. The Company’s FFO and Core FFO calculations are reconciled to net income in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations included in this release.
NOI– The Company defines net operating income (“NOI”) as operating revenues (rental income, tenant reimbursements and other income) less property and related expenses (property expenses, real estate taxes and insurance). Management believes that NOI is a useful measure of the Company’s property operating performance as it provides a performance measure of the revenues and expenses directly associated with owning, operating, developing and redeveloping office and business park properties, and provides a perspective not immediately apparent from net income or FFO. Other REITs may use different methodologies for calculating NOI, and accordingly, the Company’s NOI may not be comparable to other REITs. The Company’s NOI calculations are reconciled to total revenues and total operating expenses at the end of this release.
Same-Property NOI– Same-Property Net Operating Income (“Same-Property NOI”), defined as operating revenues (rental, tenant reimbursements and other revenues) less operating expenses (property operating expenses, real estate taxes and insurance) from the properties owned by the Company for the entirety of the periods compared, is a primary performance measure the Company uses to assess the results of operations at its properties. As an indication of the Company’s operating performance, Same-Property NOI should not be considered an alternative to net income calculated in accordance with GAAP. A reconciliation of the Company’s Same-Property NOI to net income from its consolidated statements of operations is presented below. The Same-Property NOI results exclude corporate-level expenses, as well as certain transactions, such as the collection of termination fees, as these items vary significantly period-over-period thus impacting trends and comparability. Also, the Company eliminates depreciation and amortization expense, which are property level expenses, in computing Same-Property NOI as these are non-cash expenses that are based on historical cost accounting assumptions and do not offer the investor significant insight into the operations of the property. This presentation allows management and investors to distinguish whether growth or declines in net operating income are a result of increases or decreases in property operations or the acquisition of additional properties. While this presentation provides useful information to management and investors, the results below should be read in conjunction with the results from the consolidated statements of operations to provide a complete depiction of total Company performance.
Forward Looking Statements
The forward-looking statements contained in this press release, including statements regarding the Company’s 2013 Core FFO guidance and related assumptions, the potential sale of Worman’s Mill Court and the timing of such sale, and future acquisition and growth opportunities, are subject to various risks and uncertainties. Although the Company believes the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, there can be no assurance that its expectations will be achieved. Certain factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the Company’s expectations include changes in general or regional economic conditions; the Company’s ability to timely lease or re-lease space at current or anticipated rents; changes in interest rates; changes in operating costs; the Company’s ability to complete acquisitions on acceptable terms; the Company’s ability to manage its current debt levels and repay or refinance its indebtedness upon maturity or other required payment dates; the Company’s ability to maintain financial covenant compliance under its debt agreements; the Company’s ability to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures; any impact of the informal inquiry initiated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”); the Company’s ability to obtain debt and/or financing on attractive terms, or at all; changes in the assumptions underlying the Company’s earnings and Core FFO guidance and other risks detailed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and described from time to time in the Company’s filings
10
| | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33ebe/33ebed58e636b55c50d465433ab27acce53d780b" alt="LOGO" | | Earnings Release - Continued |
with the SEC. Many of these factors are beyond the Company’s ability to control or predict. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance. For forward-looking statements herein, the Company claims the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Company assumes no obligation to update or supplement forward-looking statements that become untrue because of subsequent events.
11
| | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33ebe/33ebed58e636b55c50d465433ab27acce53d780b" alt="LOGO" | | Earnings Release - Continued |
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(unaudited, amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rental | | $ | 32,424 | | | $ | 31,516 | | | $ | 96,742 | | | $ | 93,689 | |
Tenant reimbursements and other | | | 8,413 | | | | 7,270 | | | | 25,229 | | | | 23,585 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | | | 40,837 | | | | 38,786 | | | | 121,971 | | | | 117,274 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Property operating | | | 10,878 | | | | 10,035 | | | | 31,529 | | | | 27,697 | |
Real estate taxes and insurance | | | 4,240 | | | | 3,741 | | | | 13,104 | | | | 12,253 | |
General and administrative | | | 6,346 | | | | 5,645 | | | | 16,598 | | | | 17,787 | |
Acquisition costs | | | 173 | | | | 8 | | | | 173 | | | | 49 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 14,812 | | | | 14,144 | | | | 43,891 | | | | 41,247 | |
Impairment of real estate assets | | | — | | | | 496 | | | | — | | | | 2,444 | |
Contingent consideration related to acquisition of property | | | — | | | | 112 | | | | 75 | | | | 112 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total operating expenses | | | 36,449 | | | | 34,181 | | | | 105,370 | | | | 101,589 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income | | | 4,388 | | | | 4,605 | | | | 16,601 | | | | 15,685 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other expenses, net: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense | | | 7,726 | | | | 9,974 | | | | 27,036 | | | | 30,909 | |
Interest and other income | | | (1,696 | ) | | | (1,521 | ) | | | (4,801 | ) | | | (4,528 | ) |
Equity in (earnings) losses of affiliates | | | (19 | ) | | | 30 | | | | (54 | ) | | | 52 | |
Gain on sale of investment | | | — | | | | (2,951 | ) | | | — | | | | (2,951 | ) |
Loss on debt extinguishment | | | 123 | | | | — | | | | 324 | | | | 13,221 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total other expenses, net | | | 6,134 | | | | 5,532 | | | | 22,505 | | | | 36,703 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes | | | (1,746 | ) | | | (927 | ) | | | (5,904 | ) | | | (21,018 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Benefit from income taxes | | | — | | | | 4,304 | | | | — | | | | 4,142 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Loss) income from continuing operations | | | (1,746 | ) | | | 3,377 | | | | (5,904 | ) | | | (16,876 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Discontinued operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Loss) income from operations | | | (387 | ) | | | 4,058 | | | | 5,677 | | | | 7,454 | |
Loss on debt extinguishment | | | — | | | | — | | | | (4,414 | ) | | | — | |
Gain on sale of real estate property | | | 416 | | | | — | | | | 19,363 | | | | 161 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from discontinued operations | | | 29 | | | | 4,058 | | | | 20,626 | | | | 7,615 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net (loss) income | | | (1,717 | ) | | | 7,435 | | | | 14,722 | | | | (9,261 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Less: Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests | | | 211 | | | | (232 | ) | | | (196 | ) | | | 876 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net (loss) income attributable to First Potomac Realty Trust | | | (1,506 | ) | | | 7,203 | | | | 14,526 | | | | (8,385 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Less: Dividends on preferred shares | | | (3,100 | ) | | | (3,100 | ) | | | (9,300 | ) | | | (8,864 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net (loss) income attributable to common shareholders | | $ | (4,606 | ) | | $ | 4,103 | | | $ | 5,226 | | | $ | (17,249 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
12
| | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33ebe/33ebed58e636b55c50d465433ab27acce53d780b" alt="LOGO" | | Earnings Release - Continued |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Net (loss) income attributable to common shareholders | | $ | (4,606 | ) | | $ | 4,103 | | | $ | 5,226 | | | $ | (17,249 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Real estate assets | | | 14,812 | | | | 14,144 | | | | 43,891 | | | | 41,247 | |
Discontinued operations | | | 104 | | | | 2,489 | | | | 3,928 | | | | 7,728 | |
Unconsolidated joint ventures | | | 1,332 | | | | 1,487 | | | | 4,001 | | | | 4,456 | |
Consolidated joint ventures | | | (46 | ) | | | (46 | ) | | | (150 | ) | | | (129 | ) |
Impairment of real estate assets | | | 474 | | | | 496 | | | | 1,921 | | | | 3,517 | |
Gain on sale of real estate property | | | (416 | ) | | | (2,951 | ) | | | (19,363 | ) | | | (3,112 | ) |
Net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership | | | (203 | ) | | | 209 | | | | 216 | | | | (944 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Funds from operations available to common shareholders | | $ | 11,451 | | | $ | 19,931 | | | $ | 39,670 | | | $ | 35,514 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
13
| | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33ebe/33ebed58e636b55c50d465433ab27acce53d780b" alt="LOGO" | | Earnings Release - Continued |
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(unaudited, amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Funds from operations (FFO) | | $ | 14,551 | | | $ | 23,031 | | | $ | 48,970 | | | $ | 44,378 | |
Less: Dividends on preferred shares | | | (3,100 | ) | | | (3,100 | ) | | | (9,300 | ) | | | (8,864 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
FFO available to common shareholders | | | 11,451 | | | | 19,931 | | | | 39,670 | | | | 35,514 | |
Personnel separation costs | | | 1,777 | | | | 397 | | | | 1,777 | | | | 397 | |
Loss on debt extinguishment | | | 123 | | | | — | | | | 4,738 | | | | 13,325 | |
Internal investigation costs | | | — | | | | 743 | | | | — | | | | 3,276 | |
Deferred abatement and straight-line amortization | | | — | | | | (1,567 | ) | | | (1,567 | ) | | | (1,567 | ) |
Change in tax regulation | | | — | | | | (4,327 | ) | | | — | | | | (4,327 | ) |
Acquisition costs | | | 173 | | | | 8 | | | | 173 | | | | 49 | |
Contingent consideration related to acquisition of property | | | — | | | | 112 | | | | 75 | | | | 112 | |
Legal costs associated with informal SEC inquiry | | | — | | | | — | | | | 391 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Core FFO | | $ | 13,524 | | | $ | 15,297 | | | $ | 45,257 | | | $ | 46,779 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic and diluted earnings per common share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loss from continuing operations available to common shareholders | | $ | (0.08 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | (0.28 | ) | | $ | (0.49 | ) |
Income from discontinued operations available to common shareholders | | | — | | | | 0.08 | | | | 0.37 | | | | 0.14 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net (loss) income available to common shareholders | | $ | (0.08 | ) | | $ | 0.08 | | | $ | 0.09 | | | $ | (0.35 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | 57,969 | | | | 50,267 | | | | 54,014 | | | | 50,049 | |
Diluted | | | 57,969 | | | | 50,346 | | | | 54,014 | | | | 50,049 | |
FFO available to common shareholders per share – basic and diluted | | $ | 0.19 | | | $ | 0.38 | | | $ | 0.70 | | | $ | 0.67 | |
Core FFO per share – diluted | | $ | 0.22 | | | $ | 0.29 | | | $ | 0.80 | | | $ | 0.88 | |
Weighted average common shares and units outstanding: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | 60,561 | | | | 52,869 | | | | 56,610 | | | | 52,802 | |
Diluted | | | 60,628 | | | | 52,947 | | | | 56,701 | | | | 52,884 | |
14
| | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33ebe/33ebed58e636b55c50d465433ab27acce53d780b" alt="LOGO" | | Earnings Release - Continued |
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
| | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2013 | | | December 31, 2012 | |
| | (unaudited) | | | | |
Assets: | | | | | | | | |
Rental property, net | | $ | 1,218,364 | | | $ | 1,450,679 | |
Assets held-for-sale | | | 3,447 | | | | — | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | 16,971 | | | | 9,374 | |
Escrows and reserves | | | 38,089 | | | | 13,421 | |
Accounts and other receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,698 and $1,799, respectively | | | 12,309 | | | | 15,271 | |
Accrued straight-line rents, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $168 and $530, respectively | | | 29,838 | | | | 28,133 | |
Notes receivable, net | | | 54,722 | | | | 54,730 | |
Investment in affiliates | | | 49,229 | | | | 50,596 | |
Deferred costs, net | | | 39,706 | | | | 40,370 | |
Prepaid expenses and other assets | | | 11,064 | | | | 8,597 | |
Intangible assets, net | | | 37,544 | | | | 46,577 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 1,511,283 | | | $ | 1,717,748 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage loans | | $ | 275,974 | | | $ | 418,864 | |
Secured term loan | | | — | | | | 10,000 | |
Unsecured term loan | | | 300,000 | | | | 300,000 | |
Unsecured revolving credit facility | | | 83,000 | | | | 205,000 | |
Accounts payable and other liabilities | | | 44,704 | | | | 64,920 | |
Accrued interest | | | 1,697 | | | | 2,653 | |
Rents received in advance | | | 6,969 | | | | 9,948 | |
Tenant security deposits | | | 5,799 | | | | 5,968 | |
Deferred market rent, net | | | 1,746 | | | | 3,535 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 719,889 | | | | 1,020,888 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership | | | 33,972 | | | | 34,367 | |
Equity: | | | | | | | | |
Preferred Shares, $0.001 par value, 50,000 shares authorized; Series A Preferred Shares, $25 liquidation preference, 6,400 shares issued and outstanding | | $ | 160,000 | | | $ | 160,000 | |
Common shares, $0.001 par value, 150,000 shares authorized; 58,772 and 51,047 shares issued and outstanding, respectively | | | 59 | | | | 51 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 912,444 | | | | 804,584 | |
Noncontrolling interests in consolidated partnerships | | | 3,957 | | | | 3,728 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | (5,150 | ) | | | (10,917 | ) |
Dividends in excess of accumulated earnings | | | (313,888 | ) | | | (294,953 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Total equity | | | 757,422 | | | | 662,493 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities, noncontrolling interests and equity | | $ | 1,511,283 | | | $ | 1,717,748 | |
| | | | | | | | |
15
| | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33ebe/33ebed58e636b55c50d465433ab27acce53d780b" alt="LOGO" | | Earnings Release - Continued |
Same-Property Analysis
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Same-Property NOI(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total base rent | | $ | 30,863 | | | $ | 30,389 | | | $ | 92,073 | | | $ | 90,676 | |
Tenant reimbursements and other | | | 7,833 | | | | 6,961 | | | | 23,059 | | | | 21,157 | |
Property operating expenses | | | (9,825 | ) | | | (9,553 | ) | | | (28,571 | ) | | | (27,159 | ) |
Real estate taxes and insurance | | | (3,857 | ) | | | (3,679 | ) | | | (11,931 | ) | | | (11,377 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Same-Property NOI—accrual basis | | | 25,014 | | | | 24,118 | | | | 74,630 | | | | 73,388 | |
Straight-line revenue, net | | | (432 | ) | | | (298 | ) | | | (1,148 | ) | | | (1,229 | ) |
Deferred market rental revenue, net | | | 50 | | | | 258 | | | | 74 | | | | 366 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Same-Property NOI—cash basis | | $ | 24,632 | | | $ | 24,078 | | | $ | 73,556 | | | $ | 72,525 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Change in same-property NOI—accrual basis | | | 3.7 | % | | | | | | | 1.7 | % | | | | |
Change in same-property NOI—cash basis | | | 2.3 | % | | | | | | | 1.4 | % | | | | |
Same-property percentage of total portfolio (sf) | | | 97.0 | % | | | | | | | 97.0 | % | | | | |
| | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Reconciliation of Consolidated NOI to Same-Property NOI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | | $ | 40,837 | | | $ | 38,786 | | | $ | 121,971 | | | $ | 117,274 | |
Property operating expenses | | | (10,878 | ) | | | (10,035 | ) | | | (31,529 | ) | | | (27,697 | ) |
Real estate taxes and insurance | | | (4,240 | ) | | | (3,741 | ) | | | (13,104 | ) | | | (12,253 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NOI | | | 25,719 | | | | 25,010 | | | | 77,338 | | | | 77,324 | |
Less: Non-same property NOI(2) | | | (705 | ) | | | (892 | ) | | | (2,708 | ) | | | (3,936 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Same-Property NOI—accrual basis | | $ | 25,014 | | | $ | 24,118 | | | $ | 74,630 | | | $ | 73,388 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months | | | | | | Nine Months | | | | |
| | Ended | | | | | | Ended | | | | |
| | September 30, | | | Percentage of | | | September 30, | | | Percentage of | |
| | 2013 | | | Base Rent | | | 2013 | | | Base Rent | |
Change in Same-Property NOI by Region (accrual basis) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Washington, D.C. | | | 2.5 | % | | | 13 | % | | | 3.1 | % | | | 13 | % |
Maryland | | | (1.7 | )% | | | 32 | % | | | (0.8 | )% | | | 31 | % |
Northern Virginia | | | 12.5 | % | | | 31 | % | | | 4.2 | % | | | 32 | % |
Southern Virginia | | | 0.3 | % | | | 24 | % | | | 0.7 | % | | | 24 | % |
Change in Same-Property NOI by Type (accrual basis) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Business Park / Industrial | | | 4.7 | % | | | 47 | % | | | (0.1 | )% | | | 46 | % |
Office | | | 2.8 | % | | | 53 | % | | | 3.4 | % | | | 54 | % |
(1) | Same-property comparisons are based upon those consolidated properties owned for the entirety of the periods presented. Same-property results exclude the operating results of the following non same-properties that were owned as of September 30, 2013: Three Flint Hill, 440 First Street, NW, Davis Drive, 1005 First Street, NE and Worman’s Mill Court. |
(2) | Non-same property NOI has been adjusted to reflect a normalized management fee percentage in lieu of an administrative overhead allocation for comparative purposes. |
16
| | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33ebe/33ebed58e636b55c50d465433ab27acce53d780b" alt="LOGO" | | Highlights (unaudited, dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Q3-2013 | | | Q2-2013 | | | Q1-2013 | | | Q4-2012 | | | Q3-2012 | |
Performance Metrics | | $ | 11,451 | | | $ | 11,141 | | | $ | 17,077 | | | $ | 16,601 | | | $ | 19,931 | |
FFO available to common shareholders(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Core FFO(1) | | $ | 13,524 | | | $ | 15,886 | | | $ | 15,846 | | | $ | 16,805 | | | $ | 15,297 | |
FFO available to common shareholders per share | | $ | 0.19 | | | $ | 0.20 | | | $ | 0.32 | | | $ | 0.31 | | | $ | 0.38 | |
Core FFO per share | | $ | 0.22 | | | $ | 0.28 | | | $ | 0.30 | | | $ | 0.32 | | | $ | 0.29 | |
Operating Metrics | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Change in Same-Property NOI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash Basis | | | 2.3 | % | | | (0.1 | )% | | | 1.3 | % | | | 5.3 | % | | | 1.6 | % |
Accrual Basis | | | 3.7 | % | | | 0.0 | % | | | 1.4 | % | | | 6.3 | % | | | 3.2 | % |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Assets | | $ | 1,511,283 | | | $ | 1,557,666 | | | $ | 1,718,364 | | | $ | 1,717,748 | | | $ | 1,714,237 | |
Debt Balances | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unhedged Variable Rate Debt | | $ | 76,699 | | | $ | 43,657 | | | $ | 249,500 | | | $ | 165,000 | | | $ | 129,000 | |
Hedged Variable Rate Debt(2) | | | 350,000 | | | | 350,000 | | | | 350,000 | | | | 350,000 | | | | 350,000 | |
Fixed Rate Debt | | | 232,275 | | | | 294,389 | | | | 355,387 | | | | 418,864 | | | | 442,267 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 658,974 | | | $ | 688,046 | | | $ | 954,887 | | | $ | 933,864 | | | $ | 921,267 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Leasing Metrics | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Absorption (Square Feet)(3) | | | 19,741 | | | | 69,107 | (4) | | | 177,460 | | | | 48,946 | | | | 54,841 | |
Tenant Retention Rate | | | 30 | %(5) | | | 79 | %(4) | | | 89 | % | | | 58 | % | | | 75 | % |
Leased % | | | 87.4 | % | | | 86.5 | % | | | 86.3 | % | | | 84.9 | % | | | 84.9 | % |
Occupancy % | | | 85.1 | % | | | 84.0 | % | | | 83.9 | % | | | 83.0 | % | | | 83.2 | % |
Total New Leases (Square Feet) | | | 213,000 | | | | 234,000 | | | | 218,000 | | | | 291,000 | | | | 143,000 | |
Total Renewal Leases (Square Feet) | | | 87,000 | | | | 306,000 | | | | 345,000 | | | | 318,000 | | | | 332,000 | |
(1) | See page 19 for a reconciliation of the Company’s FFO available to common shareholders and Core FFO to net (loss) income attributable to common shareholders. |
(2) | As of September 30, 2013, the Company had fixed LIBOR at a weighted averaged interest rate of 1.5% on $350.0 million of its variable rate debt through twelve interest rate swap agreements. |
(3) | Net absorption includes adjustments made for pre-leasing, deals signed in advance of existing lease expirations and unforeseen terminations. |
(4) | Both the Net Absorption and Tenant Retention Rate exclude all properties that were sold in the second quarter of 2013. |
(5) | The Company had an expected tenant retention rate of 30% in the third quarter of 2013, primarily as a result of over 200,000 square feet of known move outs in the quarter. |
17
| | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33ebe/33ebed58e636b55c50d465433ab27acce53d780b" alt="LOGO" | | Quarterly Financial Results (unaudited, dollars in thousand) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | |
| | September 30, 2013 | | | June 30, 2013 | | | March 31, 2013 | | | December 31, 2012 | | | September 30, 2012 | |
OPERATING REVENUES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rental | | $ | 32,424 | | | $ | 32,359 | | | $ | 31,959 | | | $ | 31,943 | | | $ | 31,516 | |
Tenant reimbursements and other | | | 8,413 | | | | 8,026 | | | | 8,789 | | | | 8,259 | | | | 7,270 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 40,837 | | | | 40,385 | | | | 40,748 | | | | 40,202 | | | | 38,786 | |
PROPERTY EXPENSES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Property operating | | | 10,878 | | | | 9,840 | | | | 10,810 | | | | 10,134 | | | | 10,035 | |
Real estate taxes and insurance | | | 4,240 | | | | 4,168 | | | | 4,695 | | | | 3,834 | | | | 3,741 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET OPERATING INCOME | | | 25,719 | | | | 26,377 | | | | 25,243 | | | | 26,234 | | | | 25,010 | |
OTHER (EXPENSES) INCOME | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
General and administrative | | | (6,346 | ) | | | (4,985 | ) | | | (5,267 | ) | | | (5,781 | ) | | | (5,645 | ) |
Acquisition costs | | | (173 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (8 | ) |
Interest and other income | | | 1,696 | | | | 1,574 | | | | 1,530 | | | | 1,522 | | | | 1,521 | |
Equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates | | | 19 | | | | 7 | | | | 28 | | | | 92 | | | | (30 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EBITDA | | | 20,915 | | | | 22,973 | | | | 21,534 | | | | 22,067 | | | | 20,848 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | (14,812 | ) | | | (14,657 | ) | | | (14,421 | ) | | | (14,954 | ) | | | (14,144 | ) |
Interest expense | | | (7,726 | ) | | | (9,353 | ) | | | (9,958 | ) | | | (10,090 | ) | | | (9,974 | ) |
Loss on debt extinguishment | | | (123 | ) | | | (201 | ) | | | — | | | | (466 | ) | | | — | |
Contingent consideration related to acquisition of property | | | — | | | | (75 | ) | | | — | | | | (39 | ) | | | (112 | ) |
Impairment of real estate assets | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (496 | ) |
Gain on sale of investment(1) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,951 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes | | | (1,746 | ) | | | (1,313 | ) | | | (2,845 | ) | | | (3,482 | ) | | | (927 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Benefit from income taxes | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 4,304 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Loss) income from continuing operations | | | (1,746 | ) | | | (1,313 | ) | | | (2,845 | ) | | | (3,482 | ) | | | 3,377 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Loss) income from operations | | | (387 | ) | | | 1,256 | | | | 4,808 | | | | 4,362 | | | | 4,058 | |
Loss on debt extinguishment | | | — | | | | (4,414 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Gain on sale of real estate property(2) | | | 416 | | | | 18,947 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from discontinued operations | | | 29 | | | | 15,789 | | | | 4,808 | | | | 4,362 | | | | 4,058 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET (LOSS) INCOME | | | (1,717 | ) | | | 14,476 | | | | 1,963 | | | | 880 | | | | 7,435 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Less: Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests | | | 211 | | | | (466 | ) | | | 59 | | | | 110 | | | | (232 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET (LOSS) INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO FIRST POTOMAC REALTY TRUST | | | (1,506 | ) | | | 14,010 | | | | 2,022 | | | | 990 | | | | 7,203 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Less: Dividends on preferred shares | | | (3,100 | ) | | | (3,100 | ) | | | (3,100 | ) | | | (3,100 | ) | | | (3,100 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET (LOSS) INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS | | $ | (4,606 | ) | | $ | 10,910 | | | $ | (1,078 | ) | | $ | (2,110 | ) | | $ | 4,103 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Supplemental Financial Results Items: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The following items were included in the determination of net (loss) income: | |
| |
| | Three Months Ended | |
| | September 30, 2013 | | | June 30, 2013 | | | March 31, 2013 | | | December 31,2012 | | | September 30, 2012 | |
Termination fees | | $ | 61 | | | $ | 49 | | | $ | 121 | | | $ | 606 | | | $ | 63 | |
Capitalized interest | | | 836 | | | | 360 | | | | 344 | | | | 334 | | | | 603 | |
Change in tax regulations(3) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 4,327 | |
Snow and ice removal costs (excluding reimbursements)(4) | | | (27 | ) | | | (68 | ) | | | (817 | ) | | | 66 | | | | — | |
Reserves for bad debt expense | | | (167 | ) | | | (229 | ) | | | (174 | ) | | | (55 | ) | | | (149 | ) |
Internal investigation costs | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (27 | ) | | | (743 | ) |
Legal costs associated with informal SEC inquiry | | | — | | | | (55 | ) | | | (336 | ) | | | (110 | ) | | | — | |
Personnel separation costs | | | (1,777 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (732 | ) | | | (397 | ) |
Discontinued Operations(5) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues | | $ | 319 | | | $ | 6,323 | | | $ | 10,709 | | | $ | 9,939 | | | $ | 9,965 | |
Operating expenses | | | (128 | ) | | | (1,922 | ) | | | (2,842 | ) | | | (2,519 | ) | | | (2,759 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization expense | | | (104 | ) | | | (1,337 | ) | | | (2,487 | ) | | | (2,486 | ) | | | (2,489 | ) |
Interest expense, net of interest income | | | — | | | | (362 | ) | | | (572 | ) | | | (572 | ) | | | (659 | ) |
Impairment of real estate assets | | | (474 | ) | | | (1,446 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Loss on debt extinguishment | | | — | | | | (4,414 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Gain on sale of real estate property(2) | | $ | 416 | | | $ | 18,947 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 29 | | | $ | 15,789 | | | $ | 4,808 | | | $ | 4,362 | | | $ | 4,058 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) | During the third quarter of 2012,the Company recorded a $3.0 million gain on the sale of its 95% interest in 1200 17th street, NW, an office building in Washington, U.C. |
(2) | For the three months ended September 30, 2013, the gain on sale of real estate property includes $0.4 million related to the sale of 4200 Tech Court. For the three months ended June 30, 2013, the gain on sale of real estate property includes $18.7 million related to the sale of the industrial portfolio and $0.2 million related to the sale of 4212 Tech Court. |
(3) | Reflects the one-time non-cash impact of new tax regulations enacted by the District of Columbia that became effective in September 2012, which is included in Benefit from income taxes in the above Quarterly Financial Results. |
(4) | The Company recovered approximately 65% of these costs. |
(5) | Represents the operating results of (i) Worman’s Mill Court, which is expected to be sold in the fourth quarter of 2013, (ii) Triangle Business Center and 4200 Tech Court, which were both sold in the third quarter of 2013, (iii) 4212 Tech Court, I-66 Commerce Center, Frederick Industrial Park, Mercedes Center, Glen Dale Business Center, Interstate Plaza, 13129 Airpark Road, Northridge, River’s Bend Center, Cavalier Industrial Park, Diamond Hill Distribution Center and Hampton Roads Center, which were all sold in the second quarter of 2013, and (iv) two buildings at Owings Mills Business Park, which were sold in the fourth quarter of 2012. |
18
| | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33ebe/33ebed58e636b55c50d465433ab27acce53d780b" alt="LOGO" | | Quarterly Financial Measures (unaudited, amounts in thousands, except per share data) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | |
| | September 30, 2013 | | | June 30, 2013 | | | March 31, 2013 | | | December 31, 2012 | | | September 30, 2012 | |
FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS (“FFO”) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net (loss) income attributable to common shareholders | | $ | (4,606 | ) | | $ | 10,910 | | | $ | (1,078) | | | $ | (2,110) | | | $ | 4,103 | |
Depreciation and amortization: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Real estate assets | | | 14,812 | | | | 14,657 | | | | 14,421 | | | | 14,954 | | | | 14,144 | |
Discontinued operations | | | 104 | | | | 1,337 | | | | 2,487 | | | | 2,486 | | | | 2,489 | |
Unconsolidated joint ventures | | | 1,332 | | | | 1,317 | | | | 1,352 | | | | 1,428 | | | | 1,487 | |
Consolidated joint ventures | | | (46 | ) | | | (53 | ) | | | (51 | ) | | | (49 | ) | | | (46 | ) |
Impairment of real estate assets | | | 474 | | | | 1,446 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 496 | |
Gain on sale of real estate property | | | (416 | ) | | | (18,947 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (2,951 | ) |
Net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership | | | (203 | ) | | | 474 | | | | (54 | ) | | | (108 | ) | | | 209 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
FFO available to common shareholders | | | 11,451 | | | | 11,141 | | | | 17,077 | | | | 16,601 | | | | 19,931 | |
Dividends on preferred shares | | | 3,100 | | | | 3,100 | | | | 3,100 | | | | 3,100 | | | | 3,100 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
FFO | | $ | 14,551 | | | $ | 14,241 | | | $ | 20,177 | | | $ | 19,701 | | | $ | 23,031 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
FFO available to common shareholders | | | 11,451 | | | | 11,141 | | | | 17,077 | | | | 16,601 | | | | 19,931 | |
Personnel separation costs | | | 1,777 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 732 | | | | 397 | |
Loss on debt extinguishment(1) | | | 123 | | | | 4,615 | | | | — | | | | 466 | | | | — | |
Internal investigation costs(2) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 27 | | | | 743 | |
Deferred abatement and straight-line amortization(3) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (1,567 | ) | | | (1,567 | ) | | | (1,567 | ) |
Change in tax regulation(4) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (4,327 | ) |
Acquisition costs | | | 173 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 8 | |
Contingent consideration related to acquisition of property | | | — | | | | 75 | | | | — | | | | 39 | | | | 112 | |
Development costs(5) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 397 | | | | — | |
Legal costs associated with informal SEC inquiry | | | — | | | | 55 | | | | 336 | | | | 110 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Core FFO | | $ | 13,524 | | | $ | 15,886 | | | $ | 15,846 | | | $ | 16,805 | | | $ | 15,297 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ADJUSTED FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS (“AFFO”) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Core FFO | | $ | 13,524 | | | $ | 15,886 | | | $ | 15,846 | | | $ | 16,805 | | | $ | 15,297 | |
Non-cash share-based compensation expense | | | 838 | | | | 891 | | | | 771 | | | | 1,271 | | | | 856 | |
Straight-line rent, net(6) | | | (446 | ) | | | (459 | ) | | | (292 | ) | | | (226 | ) | | | (361 | ) |
Deferred market rent, net | | | 50 | | | | (3 | ) | | | (18 | ) | | | (74 | ) | | | 228 | |
Non-real estate depreciation and amortization(7) | | | 332 | | | | 256 | | | | 242 | | | | 245 | | | | 251 | |
Debt fair value amortization | | | (58 | ) | | | (76 | ) | | | (8 | ) | | | (24 | ) | | | (35 | ) |
Provision for income taxes | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 23 | |
Amortization of finance costs | | | 672 | | | | 816 | | | | 756 | | | | 777 | | | | 683 | |
Tenant improvements(8) | | | (3,190 | ) | | | (6,413 | ) | | | (3,544 | ) | | | (4,898 | ) | | | (3,108 | ) |
Leasing commissions(8) | | | (1,690 | ) | | | (1,629 | ) | | | (1,352 | ) | | | (941 | ) | | | (830 | ) |
Capital expenditures(8) | | | (2,728 | ) | | | (1,627 | ) | | | (2,010 | ) | | | (4,034 | ) | | | (1,634 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
AFFO | | $ | 7,304 | | | $ | 7,642 | | | $ | 10,391 | | | $ | 8,901 | | | $ | 11,370 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total weighted average common shares and OP units: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | 60,561 | | | | 56,184 | | | | 53,002 | | | | 52,927 | | | | 52,869 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted | | | 60,628 | | | | 56,289 | | | | 53,106 | | | | 53,026 | | | | 52,947 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
FFO available to common shareholders and units per share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
FFO—basic and diluted | | $ | 0.19 | | | $ | 0.20 | | | $ | 0.32 | | | $ | 0.31 | | | $ | 0.38 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Core FFO—diluted | | $ | 0.22 | | | $ | 0.28 | | | $ | 0.30 | | | $ | 0.32 | | | $ | 0.29 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
AFFO per share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
AFFO—basic | | $ | 0.12 | | | $ | 0.14 | | | $ | 0.20 | | | $ | 0.17 | | | $ | 0.22 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
AFFO—diluted | | $ | 0.12 | | | $ | 0.14 | | | $ | 0.20 | | | $ | 0.17 | | | $ | 0.21 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) | During the third quarter of 2013, the Company incurred $0.1 million in charges related to the transfer of a mortgage loan to 840 First Street, NE. During the second quarter of 2013, the Company incurred $4.6 million in charges related to the prepayment of certain mortgage debt associated with the previously disclosed sales of the 24 industrial properties and the paydown of a mortgage loan encumbering Cloverleaf Center, the Bridge Loan and the Secured Term Loan. During the fourth quarter of 2012, the Company incurred a $0.5 million charge related to the defeasement of a mortgage loan that encumbered four buildings at Owings Mills Business Park, of which two buildings were sold on November 7, 2012. |
(2) | Represents legal and accounting fees incurred in connection with the Company’s completed internal investigation. |
(3) | Represents the accelerated amortization of the straight line balance and the deferred abatement for Engineering Solutions at I-66 Commerce Center, which terminated its lease prior to completion. The tenant vacated the property on March 31, 2013 and I-66 Commerce Center was sold in the second quarter of 2013. |
(4) | Reflects the one-time non-cash impact of new tax regulations enacted by the District of Columbia that became effective in September 2012. |
(5) | During the fourth quarter of 2012, the Company expensed development costs related to a project that was deferred at Greenbrier Business Park. |
(6) | Includes the Company’s amortization of the following: straight-line rents and associated uncollectable amounts, rent abatements and lease incentives. |
(7) | Most non-real estate depreciation is classified in general and administrative expense. |
(8) | Does not include first-generation costs, which the Company defines as tenant improvements, leasing commissions and capital expenditure costs that were taken into consideration when underwriting the purchase of a property or incurred to bring the property to operating standard for its intended use. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
First-generation costs | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tenant improvements | | $ | 1,420 | | | $ | 3,265 | | | $ | 2,588 | | | $ | 3,881 | | | $ | 3,289 | |
Leasing commissions | | | 1,738 | | | | 536 | | | | 461 | | | | 516 | | | | 1,021 | |
Capital expenditures | | | 1,145 | | | | 2,215 | | | | 2,049 | | | | 4,513 | | | | 1,633 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total first-generation costs | | | 4,303 | | | | 6,016 | | | | 5,098 | | | | 8,910 | | | | 5,943 | |
Development and redevelopment | | | 1,850 | | | | 5,692 | | | | 4,813 | | | | 4,939 | | | | 2,653 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 6,153 | | | $ | 11,708 | | | $ | 9,911 | | | $ | 13,849 | | | $ | 8,596 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
19
| | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33ebe/33ebed58e636b55c50d465433ab27acce53d780b" alt="LOGO" | | Capitalization and Selected Ratios (unaudited, dollars in thousands, except per share data, percentages and ratios) |
Total Market Capitalization
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Percent of Total Market Capitalization | |
Common Shares and Units | | | | | | | | |
Total common shares outstanding | | | 58,772 | | | | | |
Operating Partnership (“OP”) units held by third parties | | | 2,592 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total common shares and OP units outstanding | | | 61,364 | | | | | |
Market price per share at September 30, 2013 | | $ | 12.57 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Market Value of Common Equity | | $ | 771,345 | | | | 48.4 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Preferred Shares | | | | | | | | |
Total Series A Preferred Shares outstanding | | | 6,400 | | | | | |
Market price per share at September 30, 2013 | | $ | 25.40 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Market Value of Preferred Equity | | $ | 162,560 | | | | 10.2 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Debt | | | | | | | | |
Fixed-rate debt | | $ | 232,275 | | | | 14.6 | % |
Hedged variable-rate debt(1) | | | 350,000 | | | | 22.0 | % |
Unhedged variable-rate debt | | | 76,699 | | | | 4.8 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Total debt | | $ | 658,974 | | | | 41.4 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Market Capitalization | | $ | 1,592,879 | | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Selected Ratios
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | |
| | September 30, 2013 | | | June 30, 2013 | | | March 31, 2013 | | | December 31, 2012 | | | September 30, 2012 | |
COVERAGE RATIOS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest Coverage Ratio | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EBITDA, excluding acquisition costs(2) | | $ | 21,088 | | | $ | 22,973 | | | $ | 21,534 | | | $ | 22,067 | | | $ | 20,856 | |
Interest expense | | | 7,726 | | | | 9,353 | | | | 9,958 | | | | 10,090 | | | | 9,974 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2.73x | | | | 2.46x | | | | 2.16x | | | | 2.19x | | | | 2.09x | |
Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EBITDA, excluding acquisition costs(2) | | $ | 21,088 | | | $ | 22,973 | | | $ | 21,534 | | | $ | 22,067 | | | $ | 20,856 | |
Fixed charges(3) | | | 12,458 | | | | 14,294 | | | | 15,051 | | | | 15,230 | | | | 15,060 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 1.69x | | | | 1.61x | | | | 1.43x | | | | 1.45x | | | | 1.38x | |
OVERHEAD RATIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
G&A to Real Estate Revenues | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
General and administrative expense(4) | | $ | 4,569 | | | $ | 4,924 | | | $ | 4,931 | | | $ | 4,912 | | | $ | 4,505 | |
Total revenues | | | 40,837 | | | | 40,385 | | | | 40,748 | | | | 40,202 | | | | 38,786 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 11.2 | % | | | 12.2 | % | | | 12.1 | % | | | 12.2 | % | | | 11.6 | % |
LEVERAGE RATIOS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Debt/Total Market Capitalization Total debt | | $ | 658,974 | | | $ | 688,046 | | | $ | 954,887 | | | $ | 933,864 | | | $ | 921,267 | |
Total market capitalization | | | 1,592,879 | | | | 1,658,187 | | | | 1,919,706 | | | | 1,761,716 | | | | 1,776,780 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 41.4 | % | | | 41.5 | % | | | 49.7 | % | | | 53.0 | % | | | 51.9 | % |
Debt/Undepreciated Book Value Total debt | | $ | 658,974 | | | $ | 688,046 | | | $ | 954,887 | | | $ | 933,864 | | | $ | 921,267 | |
Undepreciated book value | | | 1,423,717 | | | | 1,422,287 | | | | 1,687,645 | | | | 1,681,763 | | | | 1,660,704 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 46.3 | % | | | 48.4 | % | | | 56.6 | % | | | 55.5 | % | | | 55.5 | % |
(1) | At September 30, 2013, the Company had fixed LIBOR at a weighted average interest rate of 1.5% on $350.0 million of its variable rate debt through twelve interest rate swap agreements. |
(2) | Acquisition costs were omitted due to their variability, which impacted the comparability of period-over-period results. |
(3) | Fixed charges include interest expense, debt principal amortization and quarterly accumulated dividends on the Company’s preferred shares. |
(4) | Excludes personnel separation costs, legal costs associated with informal SEC inquiry and internal investigation costs. For detail of these costs, seethereconcilation of FFO available to common shareholders to Core FFO on the Quarterly Financial Measures table. |
20
| | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33ebe/33ebed58e636b55c50d465433ab27acce53d780b" alt="LOGO" | | Outstanding Debt (unaudited, dollars in thousands) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fixed-Rate Debt | | Effective Interest Rate | | | Balance at September 30, 2013 | | | Annualized Debt Service | | | Maturity Date | | | Balance at Maturity | |
Encumbered Properties | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Annapolis Business Center(1) | | | 6.25 | % | | $ | 8,114 | | | $ | 665 | | | | 6/1/2014 | | | $ | 8,010 | |
Jackson National Life Loan(2) | | | 5.19 | % | | | 66,400 | | | | 6,582 | | | | 8/1/2015 | | | | 64,230 | |
Hanover Business Center Building D(1) | | | 6.63 | % | | | 288 | | | | 161 | | | | 8/1/2015 | | | | 13 | |
Chesterfield Business Center Buildings C, D, G and H(1) | | | 6.63 | % | | | 772 | | | | 414 | | | | 8/1/2015 | | | | 34 | |
Gateway Centre Manassas Building I(1) | | | 5.88 | % | | | 688 | | | | 239 | | | | 11/1/2016 | | | | — | |
Hillside Center(1) | | | 4.62 | % | | | 13,448 | | | | 945 | | | | 12/6/2016 | | | | 12,160 | |
Redland Corporate Center | | | 4.64 | % | | | 67,336 | | | | 4,014 | | | | 11/1/2017 | | | | 62,064 | |
Hanover Business Center Building C(1) | | | 6.63 | % | | | 688 | | | | 186 | | | | 12/1/2017 | | | | 13 | |
840 First Street, NE(3) | | | 6.01 | % | | | 37,298 | | | | 2,722 | | | | 7/1/2020 | | | | 32,000 | |
Battlefield Corporate Center | | | 4.40 | % | | | 3,889 | | | | 320 | | | | 11/1/2020 | | | | 2,618 | |
Chesterfield Business Center Buildings A, B, E and F(1) | | | 6.63 | % | | | 1,921 | | | | 318 | | | | 6/1/2021 | | | | 26 | |
Airpark Business Center(1) | | | 6.63 | % | | | 1,048 | | | | 173 | | | | 6/1/2021 | | | | 14 | |
1211 Connecticut Avenue, NW | | | 4.47 | % | | | 30,385 | | | | 1,823 | | | | 7/1/2022 | | | | 24,668 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Fixed-Rate Debt | | | 5.09 | %(4) | | $ | 232,275 | | | $ | 18,562 | | | | | | | $ | 205,850 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unamortized fair value adjustments | | | | | | | (714 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Principal Balance | | | | | | $ | 231,561 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Variable-Rate Debt(5) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1005 First Street, NE(6) | | | 5.80 | % | | | 22,000 | | | | 1,100 | | | | 10/16/2014 | | | | 22,000 | |
Construction Loan(7) | | | LIBOR + 2.50% | | | | 21,699 | | | | 582 | | | | 5/30/2016 | | | | 21,699 | |
Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility(8) | | | LIBOR + 2.25% | | | | 83,000 | | | | 2,017 | | | | 1/15/2015 | | | | 83,000 | |
Unsecured Term Loan(8) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tranche A | | | LIBOR + 2.15% | | | | 60,000 | | | | 1,398 | | | | 7/18/2016 | | | | 60,000 | |
Tranche B | | | LIBOR + 2.25% | | | | 147,500 | | | | 3,584 | | | | 7/18/2017 | | | | 147,500 | |
Tranche C | | | LIBOR + 2.30% | | | | 92,500 | | | | 2,294 | | | | 7/18/2018 | | | | 92,500 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2.43 | %(4) | | | 300,000 | | | | 7,276 | | | | | | | | 300,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Variable-Rate Debt | | | 4.19 | %(4)(9) | | $ | 426,699 | | | $ | 10,975 | | | | | | | $ | 426,699 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Debt at September 30, 2013 | | | 4.51 | %(4)(9) | | $ | 658,974 | | | $ | 29,537 | (10) | | | | | | $ | 632,549 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) | The balance includes the fair value impacts recorded at acquisition upon assumption of the mortgages encumbering these properties. |
(2) | At September 30, 2013, the loan was secured by the following properties: Plaza 500, Van Buren Office Park, Rumsey Center, Snowden Center, Greenbrier Technology Center II, and Norfolk Business Center. The terms of the loan allow the Company to substitute collateral, as long as certain debt-service coverage and loan-to-value ratios are maintained, or to prepay a portion of the loan, with a prepayment penalty, subject to a debt service yield. |
(3) | On September 30, 2013, the Company repaid the $53.9 million mortgage loan that encumbered 840 First Street, NE, which was scheduled to mature on October 1, 2013. 840 First Street, NE is subject to a tax protection agreement, which requires that the Company maintain a specified minimum amount of debt on the property through March 2018. As a result of this agreement, simultaneously with the repayment of the mortgage loan, the Company encumbered 840 First Street, NE with a $37.3 million mortgage loan that had previously encumbered 500 First Street, NW. |
(4) | Represents the weighted average interest rate. |
(5) | All of the Company’s variable rate debt is based on one-month LIBOR. For the purposes of calculating the annualized debt service and the effective interest rate, the Company used the one-month LIBOR rate at September 30, 2013, which was 0.18%. |
(6) | The loan has a contractual interest rate of LIBOR plus a spread of 2.75% (with a floor of 5.0%) and matures in October 2014, with a one-year extension at the Company’s option. |
(7) | The loan matures in May 2016, with two one-year extension options at the Company’s discretion and has a borrowing capacity of up to $43.5 million. The Company can repay all or a portion of the Construction Loan, without penalty, at any time during the term of the loan. |
(8) | On October 16, 2013, the Company amended its unsecured revolving credit facility and unsecured term loans. The Company increased the size of the unsecured revolving credit facility from $255 million to $300 million, and extended the maturity date to October 2017, with a one-year extension at the Company’s option. The Company’s unsecured term loan was divided into three $100 million tranches that mature in October 2018, 2019 and 2020. As part of the amendment, the Company reduced its LIBOR spreads to current market rates, which, depending on the Company’s leverage ratios could reduce the applicable LIBOR spreads on its unsecured revolving credit facility and unsecured term loan by 50 to 90 basis points. |
(9) | At September 30, 2013, the Company had fixed LIBOR on $350.0 million of its variable rate debt through twelve interest rate swap agreements. The effective interest rate reflects the impact of the Company’s interest rate swap agreements. |
(10) | During the third quarter of 2013, the Company paid approximately $1.6 million in principal payments on its consolidated mortgage debt, which excludes $60.5 million related to mortgage debt that was repaid during the third quarter of 2013. |
21
| | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33ebe/33ebed58e636b55c50d465433ab27acce53d780b" alt="LOGO" | | Debt Maturity Schedule (unaudited, dollars in thousands) |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7dd07/7dd07ee92ea3edafe2ce52678a16d2437e00d7c0" alt="LOGO"
NOI of Pledged Properties and Supported Indebtedness
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year of Maturity | | Type | | Annualized NOI(2)(3) | | | Total Maturing Indebtedness | | | Total Supported Indebtedness | | | Debt Yield | |
2014 | | Secured Property Debt | | $ | 3,252 | | | $ | 30,010 | | | $ | 30,010 | | | | 10.8 | % |
2015 | | Secured Property Debt | | | 11,696 | | | | 64,277 | | | | 64,277 | | | | 18.2 | % |
2016 | | Secured Property Debt | | | 857 | | | | 12,160 | | | | 12,160 | | | | 7.0 | % |
2016 | | Construction Loan | | | — | | | | 21,699 | | | | 21,699 | | | | NM | |
2017 | | Secured Property Debt | | | 7,241 | | | | 62,077 | | | | 62,077 | | | | 11.7 | % |
2017(2) | | Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility | | | 69,372 | | | | 83,000 | | | | 383,000 | | | | 18.1 | % |
2018(2) | | Unsecured Term Loan | | | 69,372 | | | | 100,000 | | | | 383,000 | | | | 18.1 | % |
2019(2) | | Unsecured Term Loan | | | 69,372 | | | | 100,000 | | | | 383,000 | | | | 18.1 | % |
2020(2) | | Unsecured Term Loan | | | 69,372 | | | | 100,000 | | | | 383,000 | | | | 18.1 | % |
2020 | | Secured Property Debt | | | 7,518 | | | | 34,618 | | | | 34,618 | | | | 21.7 | % |
2021 | | Secured Property Debt | | | 719 | | | | 40 | | | | 40 | | | | NM | |
2022 | | Secured Property Debt | | | 3,464 | | | | 24,668 | | | | 24,668 | | | | 14.0 | % |
NM = Not meaningful.
(1) | At September 30, 2013, the Company had fixed LIBOR on $350.0 million of its variable rate debt through twelve interest rate swap agreements. |
(2) | On October 16, 2013, the Company amended its unsecured revolving credit facility and unsecured term loans. The Company increased the size of the unsecured revolving credit facility from $255 million to $300 million and increased the term of the facility by approximately four years. The unsecured revolving credit facility will mature in October 2017, with a one-year extension at the Company’s option. The Company also extended the maturity dates of each of the three loans that comprise the $300 million unsecured term loan by approximately two years. The amended terms are reflected in the table. |
(3) | NOI calculated using the defintions in the unsecured debt covenants that were amended on October 16, 2013. |
22
| | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33ebe/33ebed58e636b55c50d465433ab27acce53d780b" alt="LOGO" | | Selected Debt Covenants (unaudited, dollars in thousands) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | Credit Facility / Unsecured | |
| | Term Loan / Construction Loan | |
| | Quarter Ended September 30, 2013 | | | Covenant | |
Covenants(1) | | | | | | | | |
Consolidated Total Leverage Ratio(2) | | | 43.1 | % | | | < 60 | % |
Net Worth(2) | | $ | 944,046 | | | | > 601,202 | |
Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio(2) | | | 1.89x | | | | > 1.50x | |
Maximum Dividend Payout Ratio | | | 63.0 | % | | | < 95 | % |
Restricted Investments: | | | | | | | | |
Joint Ventures | | | 5.8 | % | | | < 15 | % |
Real Estate Assets Under Development | | | 3.2 | % | | | < 15 | % |
Undeveloped Land | | | 1.4 | % | | | < 5 | % |
Structured Finance Investments | | | 3.3 | % | | | < 5 | % |
Total Restricted Investments | | | 7.8 | % | | | < 25 | % |
Restricted Indebtedness: | | | | | | | | |
Maximum Secured Debt | | | 19.5 | % | | | < 40 | % |
Unencumbered Pool Leverage(2) | | | 42.6 | % | | | < 60 | % |
Unencumbered Pool Interest Coverage Ratio(2) | | | 4.75x | | | | > 1.75x | |
(1) | On October 16, 2013, the Company amended its unsecured revolving credit facility and unsecured term loans. As part of these amendments, the Company, among other things, reduced its LIBOR spreads to current market rates, eliminated the prepayment lock-outs associated with the unsecured term loan, decreased the capitalization rates used to calculate gross asset value in the covenant calculations, and moved to a covenant package more closely aligned with the Company’s strategic plan. The covenants listed above reflect the amended covenants, which, pursuant to the terms of the amendments, are applicable to the Company with respect to the quarter ended September 30, 2013. |
(2) | These are the only covenants that apply to the Construction Loan, which are calculated in accordance with the amended unsecured revolving credit facility. |
23
| | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33ebe/33ebed58e636b55c50d465433ab27acce53d780b" alt="LOGO" | | Net Asset Value Analysis (unaudited, dollars in thousands, except percentages) |
| | | | |
Income Statement Items(1) | | Three Months Ended September 30, 2013 | |
Total Portfolio In-Place Cash NOI | | | | |
Total GAAP Revenue | | $ | 40,837 | |
Straight-line and Deferred Market Rents | | | (392 | ) |
Management Fee Adjustment(2) | | | 521 | |
Property Operating Costs | | | (15,118 | ) |
| | | | |
Total Portfolio In-Place Cash NOI | | $ | 25,848 | |
| | | | |
Occupancy as of September 30, 2013 | | | 85.1 | % |
Balance Sheet Items | | | | |
Development & Redevelopment Assets | | | | |
Original Cost Basis of Land held for Future Development | | $ | 22,664 | |
Original Cost Basis of Land in Current Development/Redevelopment | | | 66,870 | |
Construction Costs to Date for Current Development/Redevelopment | | | 31,843 | |
| | | | |
Total Development & Redevelopment Assets | | $ | 121,377 | |
| | | | |
Other Assets | | | | |
Investments in Affiliates | | $ | 49,229 | |
Notes Receivable, net | | | 54,722 | |
| | | | |
Total Other Assets | | $ | 103,951 | |
| | | | |
Net Liabilities at 9/30/2013 | | | | |
Mortgage and Senior Debt, cash principal balances | | $ | (658,260 | ) |
Accrued interest | | | (1,697 | ) |
Rents received in advance | | | (6,969 | ) |
Tenant security deposits | | | (5,799 | ) |
Accounts payable and other liabilities | | | (44,704 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents, escrows and reserves | | | 55,060 | |
Accounts and other receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts | | | 12,309 | |
Prepaid expenses and other assets | | | 11,064 | |
| | | | |
Total Net Liabilities | | $ | (638,996 | ) |
| | | | |
Preferred Shares Outstanding at 9/30/2013 | | | 6,400 | |
Par Value of Preferred Shares Outstanding at 93/30/2013 | | $ | 160,000 | |
Weighted Average Diluted Shares and OP Units Outstanding at 9/30/2013 | | | 60,628 | |
(1) | Does not include figures from discontinued operations. |
(2) | Management fee adjustment, which equates to 4% of cash basis revenue, is used in lieu of an administrative overhead allocation for comparative purposes. |
24
| | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33ebe/33ebed58e636b55c50d465433ab27acce53d780b" alt="LOGO" | | Investment in Joint Ventures (unaudited, dollars in thousands) |
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | FPO Ownership | | | FPO Initial Investment | | | FPO Investment at September 30, 2013 | | | Property Type | | Location | | Square Feet | | | Leased at September 30, 2013 | | | Occupied at September 30, 2013 | |
RiversPark I and II | | | 25 | % | | $ | 3,857 | | | $ | 2,720 | | | Business Park | | Columbia, MD | | | 307,984 | | | | 94.7 | % | | | 90.9 | % |
Aviation Business Park | | | 50 | % | | | 4,190 | | | | 5,028 | | | Office | | Glen Burnie, MD | | | 120,285 | | | | 45.9 | % | | | 45.9 | % |
1750 H Street, NW | | | 50 | % | | | 16,795 | | | | 16,449 | | | Office | | Washington, DC | | | 112,269 | | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
Prosperity Metro Plaza | | | 51 | % | | | 28,124 | | | | 25,032 | | | Office | | Fairfax, VA | | | 327,470 | | | | 89.5 | % | | | 85.7 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / Weighted Average | | | | | | $ | 52,966 | | | $ | 49,229 | | | | | | | | 868,008 | | | | 86.7 | % | | | 83.9 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding Debt | | FPO Ownership | | | Effective Interest Rate | | | Principal Balance at September 30, 2013(1) | | | Annualized Debt Service | | | Maturity Date | | Balance at Maturity(1) | |
RiversPark I and II | | | 25 | % | | | 2.75 | % | | $ | 28,000 | | | $ | 770 | | | 3/26/2014(2) | | $ | 28,000 | |
1750 H Street, NW | | | 50 | % | | | 5.17 | % | | | 28,809 | | | | 2,634 | | | 6/11/2014 | | | 27,975 | |
Prosperity Metro Plaza | | | 51 | % | | | 3.86 | % | | | 50,346 | | | | 3,628 | | | 1/11/2015 | | | 48,140 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / Weighted Average | | | | | | | 3.92 | % | | $ | 107,155 | | | $ | 7,032 | | | | | $ | 104,115 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income Statement—Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended(3) | |
| | September 30, 2013 | | | June 30, 2013 | | | March 31, 2013 | | | December 31, 2012 | | | September 30, 2012 | |
Total revenues | | $ | 6,035 | | | $ | 5,959 | | | $ | 6,052 | | | $ | 6,370 | | | $ | 6,254 | |
Total operating expenses | | | (1,879 | ) | | | (1,905 | ) | | | (1,865 | ) | | | (1,918 | ) | | | (1,883 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net operating income | | | 4,156 | | | | 4,054 | | | | 4,187 | | | | 4,452 | | | | 4,371 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | (2,887 | ) | | | (2,854 | ) | | | (2,939 | ) | | | (3,054 | ) | | | (3,174 | ) |
Interest expense, net of interest income | | | (1,063 | ) | | | (1,062 | ) | | | (1,060 | ) | | | (1,080 | ) | | | (1,085 | ) |
Other (expenses) income | | | (28 | ) | | | (28 | ) | | | (14 | ) | | | (32 | ) | | | 15 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 178 | | | $ | 110 | | | $ | 174 | | | $ | 286 | | | $ | 127 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) | Reflects the balance of the debt secured by the properties, not First Potomac’s portion of the debt. |
(2) | During the third quarter of 2013, the loan was extended by six months to March 26, 2014. |
(3) | Reflects the operating results of the property, not First Potomac’s economic interest in the properties. |
25
| | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33ebe/33ebed58e636b55c50d465433ab27acce53d780b" alt="LOGO" | | Portfolio Summary (unaudited) |
Consolidated Portfolio
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Number of Buildings | | | Square Feet(1) | | | % Leased(1) | | | % Occupied(1) | | | Annualized Cash Basis Rent(2)(3) | | | % of Annualized Cash Basis Rent | |
Washington DC | | | 3 | | | | 502,690 | | | | 93.1 | % | | | 90.5 | % | | $ | 14,675,878 | | | | 13.1 | % |
Maryland | | | 53 | | | | 2,544,481 | | | | 86.6 | % | | | 81.6 | % | | | 34,095,413 | | | | 30.3 | % |
Northern VA | | | 51 | | | | 3,085,740 | | | | 87.7 | % | | | 86.7 | % | | | 37,590,264 | | | | 33.4 | % |
Southern VA | | | 38 | | | | 2,852,240 | | | | 86.8 | % | | | 85.6 | % | | | 26,077,968 | | | | 23.2 | % |
Richmond | | | 19 | | | | 827,623 | | | | 78.5 | % | | | 78.5 | % | | | 5,844,090 | | | | 5.2 | % |
Norfolk | | | 19 | | | | 2,024,617 | | | | 90.1 | % | | | 88.5 | % | | | 20,233,878 | | | | 18.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / Weighted Average | | | 145 | | | | 8,985,151 | | | | 87.4 | % | | | 85.1 | % | | $ | 112,439,523 | | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Projected | | | | | | Estimated | | | | |
| | | | | | | Total | | | Investment | | | Date | | | Expected | |
Significant Development/Redevelopment(4) | | Region | | Square Feet | | | Investment(5) | | | To Date(5) | | | In Service(6) | | | Return | |
(dollars in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Redevelopment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
440 First Street, NW | | Washington DC | | | 139,273 | | | $ | 59,000 | | | $ | 51,801 | | | | Q4-2014 | | | | 8 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Consolidated Portfolio | | | | | 9,124,424 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Number of Buildings | | | Square Feet(1) | | | % Leased(1) | | | % Occupied(1) | | | Annualized Cash Basis Rent(2)(3) | |
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures(7) | | | 12 | | | | 868,008 | | | | 86.7 | % | | | 83.9 | % | | $ | 15,059,429 | |
(1) | Does not include space in development or redevelopment. |
(2) | Annualized cash basis rent at the end of the quarter, which is calculated as the contractual rent due under the terms of the lease, without taking into account rent abatements, is reflected on a triple-net equivalent basis, by deducting operating expense reimbursements that are included, along with base rent, in the contractual payments of the Company’s full service leases. |
(3) | Includes leased spaces that are not yet occupied. |
(4) | 841,145 square feet of additional land is available for development, not including 1005 First Street, NE. |
(5) | Total Investment includes original cost basis of property, projected base building costs and projected tenant improvements. |
(6) | Development/redevelopment is estimated to be placed in service one year from substantial completion. |
(7) | Represents operating results of the unconsolidated joint ventures, not First Potomac’s economic interest in the properties. |
26
| | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33ebe/33ebed58e636b55c50d465433ab27acce53d780b" alt="LOGO" | | Leasing and Occupancy Summary (unaudited) |
Total Portfolio by Property Type(1)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Occupied Portfolio by Property Type | | | Leased Portfolio by Property Type | |
| | Square Feet | | | % of Total Portfolio | | | Number of Buildings | | | Occupied Square Feet | | | % Occupied | | | Annualized Cash Basis Rent(2) | | | % of Annualized Cash Basis Rent | | | Leased Square Feet(3) | | | % Leased | | | Annualized Cash Basis Rent(2)(3) | | | % of Annualized Cash Basis Rent | |
Office | | | 3,270,407 | | | | 36.4 | % | | | 50 | | | | 2,713,233 | | | | 83.0 | % | | $ | 54,680,571 | | | | 50.0 | % | | | 2,839,018 | | | | 86.8 | % | | $ | 56,850,099 | | | | 50.6 | % |
Business Park / Industrial | | | 5,714,744 | | | | 63.6 | % | | | 95 | | | | 4,933,219 | | | | 86.3 | % | | | 54,663,452 | | | | 50.0 | % | | | 5,013,583 | | | | 87.7 | % | | | 55,589,424 | | | | 49.4 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / Weighted Average | | | 8,985,151 | | | | 100 | % | | | 145 | | | | 7,646,452 | | | | 85.1 | % | | $ | 109,344,023 | | | | 100.0 | % | | | 7,852,601 | | | | 87.4 | % | | $ | 112,439,523 | | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Market Concentration by Annualized Cash Basis Rent(2)(3)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Washington DC | | | Maryland | | | Northern VA | | | Southern VA | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Richmond | | | Norfolk | | | Subtotal | | | Total | |
Office | | | 13.1 | % | | | 17.6 | % | | | 18.4 | % | | | 0.0 | % | | | 1.5 | % | | | 1.5 | % | | | 50.6 | % |
Business Park / Industrial | | | 0.0 | % | | | 12.8 | % | | | 15.0 | % | | | 5.2 | % | | | 16.5 | % | | | 21.7 | % | | | 49.4 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 13.1 | % | | | 30.3 | % | | | 33.4 | % | | | 5.2 | % | | | 18.0 | % | | | 23.2 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) | Does not include space in development or redevelopment. |
(2) | Annualized cash basis rent at the end of the quarter, which is calculated as the contractual rent due under the terms of the lease, without taking into account rent abatements, is reflected on a triple-net equivalent basis, by deducting operating expense reimbursements that are included, along with base rent, in the contractual payments of the Company’s full service leases. |
(3) | Includes leased spaces that are not yet occupied. |
27
| | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33ebe/33ebed58e636b55c50d465433ab27acce53d780b" alt="LOGO" | | Portfolio by Size (unaudited) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Square Feet Under Lease | | Number of Leases | | | Leased Square Feet | | | % of Total Square Feet | | | Annualized Cash Basis Rent(1) | | | % of Annualized Cash Basis Rent | | | Average Base Rent per Square Foot(1) | |
0-2,500 | | | 171 | | | | 261,290 | | | | 3.3 | % | | $ | 3,828,180 | | | | 3.4 | % | | $ | 14.65 | |
2,501-10,000 | | | 362 | | | | 1,910,484 | | | | 24.3 | % | | | 23,960,402 | | | | 21.3 | % | | | 12.54 | |
10,001-20,000 | | | 111 | | | | 1,514,743 | | | | 19.3 | % | | | 19,955,706 | | | | 17.7 | % | | | 13.17 | |
20,001-40,000 | | | 57 | | | | 1,517,848 | | | | 19.3 | % | | | 20,577,258 | | | | 18.3 | % | | | 13.56 | |
40,001-100,000 | | | 25 | | | | 1,529,521 | | | | 19.5 | % | | | 21,227,262 | | | | 18.9 | % | | | 13.88 | |
100,000 + | | | 8 | | | | 1,118,715 | | | | 14.2 | % | | | 22,890,715 | | | | 20.4 | % | | | 20.46 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / Weighted Average | | | 734 | | | | 7,852,601 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 112,439,523 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 14.32 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11381/11381b41b27128421f9e02205888ca1b4ec86267" alt="LOGO"
(1) | Annualized cash basis rent at the end of the quarter, which is calculated as the contractual rent due under the terms of the lease, without taking into account rent abatements, is reflected on a triple-net equivalent basis, by deducting operating expense reimbursements that are included, along with base rent, in the contractual payments of the Company’s full service leases. |
28
| | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33ebe/33ebed58e636b55c50d465433ab27acce53d780b" alt="LOGO" | | Top Twenty-Five Tenants (unaudited) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ranking | | Tenant | | Number of Leases | | | Total Leased Square Feet | | | Annualized Cash Basis Rent(1) | | | % of Annualized Cash Basis Rent | | | Weighted Average Remaining Lease Years | |
1 | | U.S. Government | | | 22 | | | | 541,360 | | | $ | 11,827,659 | | | | 10.5 | % | | | 4.1 | |
2 | | BlueCross BlueShield | | | 1 | | | | 204,314 | | | | 5,946,076 | | | | 5.3 | % | | | 9.9 | |
3 | | CACI International | | | 1 | | | | 214,214 | | | | 5,284,315 | | | | 4.7 | % | | | 3.3 | |
4 | | BAE Systems Technology Solutions & Services | | | 3 | | | | 167,881 | | | | 3,376,714 | | | | 3.0 | % | | | 6.5 | |
5 | | ICF Consulting Group Inc. | | | 2 | | | | 127,946 | | | | 3,059,138 | | | | 2.7 | % | | | 10.9 | |
6 | | Sentara Healthcare | | | 6 | | | | 276,974 | | | | 2,463,523 | | | | 2.2 | % | | | 7.0 | |
7 | | Stock Building Supply, Inc. | | | 2 | | | | 171,996 | | | | 2,106,951 | | | | 1.9 | % | | | 3.4 | |
8 | | State of Maryland—AOC | | | 14 | | | | 101,113 | | | | 1,688,813 | | | | 1.5 | % | | | 6.3 | |
9 | | Vocus, Inc. | | | 1 | | | | 93,000 | | | | 1,633,604 | | | | 1.5 | % | | | 9.5 | |
10 | | First Data Corporation | | | 1 | | | | 117,336 | | | | 1,452,620 | | | | 1.3 | % | | | 6.2 | |
11 | | Latisys-Ashburn, LLC | | | 2 | | | | 123,097 | | | | 1,386,188 | | | | 1.2 | % | | | 8.2 | |
12 | | Montgomery County, Maryland | | | 2 | | | | 57,825 | | | | 1,383,641 | | | | 1.2 | % | | | 8.2 | |
13 | | Siemens Corporation | | | 3 | | | | 100,745 | | | | 1,352,642 | | | | 1.2 | % | | | 2.9 | |
14 | | Affiliated Computer Services, Inc | | | 1 | | | | 107,422 | | | | 1,265,431 | | | | 1.1 | % | | | 3.3 | |
15 | | Lyttle Corp | | | 1 | | | | 54,530 | | | | 1,080,785 | | | | 1.0 | % | | | 9.3 | |
16 | | Harris Corporation | | | 3 | | | | 47,404 | | | | 983,501 | | | | 0.9 | % | | | 1.4 | |
17 | | International Resources Group | | | 5 | | | | 36,016 | | | | 979,813 | | | | 0.9 | % | | | 0.6 | |
18 | | Verizon | | | 5 | | | | 70,627 | | | | 970,095 | | | | 0.9 | % | | | 1.9 | |
19 | | American Public University System, Inc. | | | 3 | | | | 63,455 | | | | 904,825 | | | | 0.8 | % | | | 1.5 | |
20 | | GG Ashburn, LLC (Gold’s Gym) | | | 1 | | | | 54,560 | | | | 878,416 | | | | 0.8 | % | | | 13.5 | |
21 | | Harris Connect | | | 1 | | | | 64,486 | | | | 862,176 | | | | 0.8 | % | | | 3.0 | |
22 | | DRS Defense Solutions, LLC | | | 2 | | | | 45,675 | | | | 825,410 | | | | 0.7 | % | | | 3.1 | |
23 | | McLean Bible Church | | | 1 | | | | 53,559 | | | | 816,775 | | | | 0.7 | % | | | 10.8 | |
24 | | Telogy Networks, Inc. | | | 1 | | | | 52,145 | | | | 779,568 | | | | 0.7 | % | | | 4.7 | |
25 | | ServiceSource, Inc. | | | 3 | | | | 64,683 | | | | 740,756 | | | | 0.7 | % | | | 1.0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Subtotal Top 25 Tenants | | | 87 | | | | 3,012,363 | | | $ | 54,049,434 | | | | 48.1 | % | | | 5.8 | |
| | All Remaining Tenants | | | 647 | | | | 4,840,238 | | | | 58,390,089 | | | | 51.9 | % | | | 4.5 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total / Weighted Average | | | 734 | | | | 7,852,601 | | | $ | 112,439,523 | | | | 100.0 | % | | | 5.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tenant Diversification by Industry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b546/0b546085f82accb326afd205b1de677f3e129730" alt="LOGO"
(1) | Annualized cash basis rent at the end of the quarter, which is calculated as the contractual rent due under the terms of the lease, without taking into account rent abatements, is reflected on a triple-net equivalent basis, by deducting operating expense reimbursements that are included, along with base rent, in the contractual payments of the Company’s full service leases. |
29
| | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33ebe/33ebed58e636b55c50d465433ab27acce53d780b" alt="LOGO" | | Annual Lease Expirations (unaudited) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total Portfolio | | | Property Type | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Office | | | Business Park /Industrial | |
Year of Lease Expiration(1) | | Number of Leases Expiring | | | Leased Square Feet | | | % of Leased Square Feet | | | Annualized Cash Basis Rent(2) | | | Average Base Rent per Square Foot(2) | | | Leased Square Feet | | | Average Base Rent per Square Foot(2) | | | Leased Square Feet | | | Average Base Rent per Square Foot(2) | |
MTM | | | 2 | | �� | | 13,005 | | | | 0.2 | % | | $ | 291,432 | | | $ | 22.41 | | | | 13,005 | | | $ | 22.41 | | | | — | | | $ | — | |
2013 | | | 20 | | | | 94,138 | | | | 1.2 | % | | | 1,086,126 | | | | 11.54 | | | | 9,808 | | | | 16.19 | | | | 84,330 | | | | 11.00 | |
2014 | | | 121 | | | | 722,101 | | | | 9.2 | % | | | 9,782,874 | | | | 13.55 | | | | 288,864 | | | | 17.39 | | | | 433,237 | | | | 10.99 | |
2015 | | | 113 | | | | 728,942 | | | | 9.3 | % | | | 9,493,573 | | | | 13.02 | | | | 234,873 | | | | 16.74 | | | | 494,069 | | | | 11.26 | |
2016 | | | 104 | | | | 770,712 | | | | 9.8 | % | | | 12,656,696 | | | | 16.42 | | | | 255,528 | | | | 26.61 | | | | 515,184 | | | | 11.37 | |
2017 | | | 94 | | | | 1,214,468 | | | | 15.5 | % | | | 18,339,653 | | | | 15.10 | | | | 409,719 | | | | 21.66 | | | | 804,749 | | | | 11.76 | |
2018 | | | 87 | | | | 900,945 | | | | 11.5 | % | | | 10,028,305 | | | | 11.13 | | | | 240,918 | | | | 14.17 | | | | 660,027 | | | | 10.02 | |
2019 | | | 71 | | | | 932,600 | | | | 11.9 | % | | | 12,300,310 | | | | 13.19 | | | | 210,455 | | | | 17.53 | | | | 722,145 | | | | 11.92 | |
2020 | | | 46 | | | | 845,964 | | | | 10.8 | % | | | 11,849,721 | | | | 14.01 | | | | 416,042 | | | | 18.83 | | | | 429,922 | | | | 9.34 | |
2021 | | | 21 | | | | 325,060 | | | | 4.1 | % | | | 3,952,724 | | | | 12.16 | | | | 45,608 | | | | 16.22 | | | | 279,452 | | | | 11.50 | |
2022 | | | 20 | | | | 243,310 | | | | 3.1 | % | | | 3,276,124 | | | | 13.46 | | | | 87,092 | | | | 22.30 | | | | 156,218 | | | | 8.54 | |
Thereafter | | | 35 | | | | 1,061,356 | | | | 13.5 | % | | | 19,381,987 | | | | 18.26 | | | | 627,106 | | | | 22.57 | | | | 434,250 | | | | 12.04 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / Weighted Average | | | 734 | | | | 7,852,601 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 112,439,523 | | | $ | 14.32 | | | | 2,839,018 | | | $ | 20.02 | | | | 5,013,583 | | | $ | 11.09 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) | The company classifies leases that expired or were terminated on the last day of the year as leased square footage since the tenant is contractually entitled to the space. |
(2) | Annualized cash basis rent at the end of the quarter, which is calculated as the contractual rent due under the terms of the lease, without taking into account rent abatements, is reflected on a triple- net equivalent basis, by deducting operating expense reimbursements that are included, along with base rent, in the contractual payments of the Company’s full service leases. |
30
| | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33ebe/33ebed58e636b55c50d465433ab27acce53d780b" alt="LOGO" | | Quarterly Lease Expirations (unaudited) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Quarter of Lease Expiration(1) | | Number of Leases Expiring | | | Leased Square Feet | | | % of Leased Square Feet | | | Annualized Cash Basis Rent(2) | | | Average Base Rent per Square Foot(2) | |
MTM | | | 2 | | | | 13,005 | | | | 0.2 | % | | $ | 291,432 | | | $ | 22.41 | |
2013—Q4 | | | 20 | | | | 94,138 | | | | 1.2 | % | | | 1,086,126 | | | | 11.54 | |
2014—Q1 | | | 29 | | | | 185,242 | | | | 2.4 | % | | | 2,791,667 | | | | 15.07 | |
2014—Q2 | | | 34 | | | | 183,493 | | | | 2.3 | % | | | 2,774,625 | | | | 15.12 | |
2014—Q3 | | | 32 | | | | 176,526 | | | | 2.2 | % | | | 2,522,219 | | | | 14.29 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / Weighted Average | | | 117 | | | | 652,404 | | | | 8.3 | % | | $ | 9,466,068 | | | $ | 11.21 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) | The company classifies leases that expired or were terminated on the last day of the quarter as leased square footage since the tenant is contractually entitled to the space. |
(2) | Annualized cash basis rent at the end of the quarter, which is calculated as the contractual rent due under the terms of the lease, without taking into account rent abatements, is reflected on a triple-net equivalent basis, by deducting operating expense reimbursements that are included, along with base rent, in the contractual payments of the Company’s full service leases. |
31
| | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33ebe/33ebed58e636b55c50d465433ab27acce53d780b" alt="LOGO" | | Leasing Analysis (unaudited) |
Total Lease Summary
All Comparable and Non-comparable Leases
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ending September 30, 2013 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Average | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Average | | | Capital Cost | |
| | Square | | | Number of | | | Cash Basis | | | GAAP Basis | | | Average | | | Capital Cost | | | per Sq. Ft. | |
| | Footage | | | Leases Signed | | | Base Rent | | | Base Rent | | | Lease Term | | | Per Sq. Ft.(1) | | | per Year(1) | |
New Leases | | | 213,262 | | | | 26 | | | $ | 7.11 | | | $ | 7.53 | | | | 6.6 | | | $ | 12.16 | | | $ | 1.63 | |
First Generation New Leases | | | 35,636 | | | | 5 | | | | 17.62 | | | | 19.12 | | | | 9.8 | | | | 37.82 | | | | 3.88 | |
Second Generation New Leases(2) | | | 177,626 | | | | 21 | | | | 5.01 | | | | 5.21 | | | | 6.0 | | | | 7.01 | | | | 1.17 | |
Renewal Leases(3) | | | 86,315 | | | | 24 | | | | 10.19 | | | | 10.56 | | | | 4.0 | | | | 5.66 | | | | 1.41 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / Weighted Average | | | 299,577 | | | | 50 | | | $ | 8.00 | | | $ | 8.40 | | | | 5.9 | | | $ | 10.29 | | | $ | 1.56 | |
| | | | | | |
| | Nine Months Ending September 30, 2013 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Average | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Average | | | Capital Cost | |
| | Square | | | Number of | | | Cash Basis | | | GAAP Basis | | | Average | | | Capital Cost | | | per Sq. Ft. | |
| | Footage | | | Leases Signed | | | Base Rent | | | Base Rent | | | Lease Term | | | Per Sq. Ft.(1) | | | per Year(1) | |
New Leases | | | 665,887 | | | | 75 | | | $ | 10.69 | | | $ | 11.32 | | | | 7.6 | | | $ | 26.15 | | | $ | 3.31 | |
First Generation New Leases | | | 145,921 | | | | 18 | | | | 18.49 | | | | 20.14 | | | | 9.0 | | | | 53.10 | | | | 5.87 | |
Second Generation New Leases(2) | | | 519,966 | | | | 57 | | | | 8.51 | | | | 8.85 | | | | 7.2 | | | | 18.59 | | | | 2.60 | |
Renewal Leases(3)(4) | | | 737,411 | | | | 64 | | | | 10.46 | | | | 10.96 | | | | 4.9 | | | | 3.70 | | | | 0.75 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / Weighted Average | | | 1,403,298 | | | | 139 | | | $ | 10.57 | | | $ | 11.13 | | | | 6.2 | | | $ | 14.35 | | | $ | 1.97 | |
Lease Comparison
Comparable Leases Only(5)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ending September 30, 2013 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Cash Basis | | | GAAP Basis | | | | |
| | Square | | | Number of | | | | | | Previous | | | Percentage | | | | | | Previous | | | Percentage | | | Average | |
| | Footage | | | Leases Signed | | | Base Rent | | | Base Rent | | | Change | | | Base Rent | | | Base Rent | | | Change | | | Lease Term | |
New Leases | | | 28,206 | | | | 6 | | | $ | 11.78 | | | $ | 14.28 | | | | -17.5 | % | | $ | 12.77 | | | $ | 13.71 | | | | -6.9 | % | | | 7.1 | |
Renewal Leases(3) | | | 86,315 | | | | 24 | | | | 10.19 | | | | 11.33 | | | | -10.0 | % | | | 10.56 | | | | 10.51 | | | | 0.5 | % | | | 4.0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / Weighted Average | | | 114,521 | | | | 30 | | | $ | 10.58 | | | $ | 12.06 | | | | -12.2 | % | | $ | 11.10 | | | $ | 11.30 | | | | -1.7 | % | | | 4.8 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | Nine Months Ending September 30, 2013 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Cash Basis | | | GAAP Basis | | | | |
| | Square | | | Number of | | | | | | Previous | | | Percentage | | | | | | Previous | | | Percentage | | | Average | |
| | Footage | | | Leases Signed | | | Base Rent | | | Base Rent | | | Change | | | Base Rent | | | Base Rent | | | Change | | | Lease Term | |
New Leases | | | 127,174 | | | | 19 | | | $ | 13.44 | | | $ | 17.44 | | | | -22.9 | % | | $ | 13.95 | | | $ | 16.19 | | | | -13.9 | % | | | 7.9 | |
Renewal Leases(3) | | | 737,411 | | | | 64 | | | | 10.46 | | | | 11.39 | | | | -8.2 | % | | | 10.96 | | | | 10.85 | | | | 1.0 | % | | | 4.9 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / Weighted Average | | | 864,585 | | | | 83 | | | | 10.89 | | | | 12.28 | | | | -11.3 | % | | | 11.40 | | | | 11.64 | | | | -2.1 | % | | | 5.4 | |
(1) | The average capital cost does not include base building improvements needed to (1) bring a space up to code, (2) create building-standard operating efficiency, or (3) add demising walls and define the separate operations of a suite. |
(2) | Includes the 1,889 square foot new lease at Triangle Business Center, which was sold during the third quarter of 2013. |
(3) | Includes the 1,923 square foot renewal at Triangle Business Center, which was sold during the third quarter of 2013. |
(4) | Includes the 51,279 square foot renewal at Interstate Plaza, which was part of the industrial portfolio disposition. |
(5) | Comparable lease comparisons do not include comparable data for first generation spaces, suites that have been vacant for over twelve months, or leases with terms of less than one year. |
32
| | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33ebe/33ebed58e636b55c50d465433ab27acce53d780b" alt="LOGO" | | Retention Summary (unaudited) |
Retention Analysis Excluding Industrial Portfolio Disposition
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ending September 30, 2013 | | | Nine Months Ending September 30, 2013 (1) | |
| | Square Footage Expiring(2) | | | Square Footage Renewed | | | Retention Rate | | | Square Footage Expiring(2) | | | Square Footage Renewed | | | Retention Rate | |
Total Portfolio | | | 290,242 | | | | 86,315 | | | | 30 | % | | | 999,396 | | | | 686,132 | | | | 69 | % |
Washington DC(3) | | | 42,832 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | % | | | 63,797 | | | | 20,965 | | | | 33 | % |
Maryland | | | 114,189 | | | | 19,930 | | | | 17 | % | | | 174,801 | | | | 62,129 | | | | 36 | % |
Northern Virginia | | | 68,425 | | | | 34,932 | | | | 51 | % | | | 263,472 | | | | 197,703 | | | | 75 | % |
Southern Virginia | | | 64,796 | | | | 31,453 | | | | 49 | % | | | 497,326 | | | | 405,335 | | | | 82 | % |
(1) | Excludes second quarter leasing activity for properties included in the industrial portfolio disposition: 236,082 square foot expiration at I-66 Commerce Center and a 51,279 square foot renewal at Interstate Plaza. |
(2) | Leases that expire or are terminated on the last day of the quarter are classified as leased square footage and are not reported as expired until the followingquarter. |
(3) | Excludes the 30,414 square foot expiration at 1005 First Street, NE, which was placed into development during the third quarter of 2013. |
33
| | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33ebe/33ebed58e636b55c50d465433ab27acce53d780b" alt="LOGO" | | Office Properties (unaudited) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Annualized | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Cash Basis | | | % | | | | |
Property(1) | | Buildings | | | Location | | Square Feet | | | Rent(2) | | | Leased | | | % Occupied | |
Washington DC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
500 First Street, NW | | | 1 | | | Capitol Hill | | | 129,035 | | | $ | 4,822,302 | | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
840 First Street, NE | | | 1 | | | NoMA(3) | | | 248,536 | | | | 6,316,895 | | | | 87.5 | % | | | 82.2 | % |
1211 Connecticut Avenue, NW | | | 1 | | | CBD(3) | | | 125,119 | | | | 3,536,681 | | | | 97.1 | % | | | 97.1 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / Weighted Average | | | 3 | | | | | | 502,690 | | | $ | 14,675,878 | | | | 93.1 | % | | | 90.5 | % |
Maryland | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Annapolis Business Center | | | 2 | | | Annapolis | | | 102,374 | | | | 1,688,813 | | | | 98.8 | % | | | 98.8 | % |
Cloverleaf Center | | | 4 | | | Germantown | | | 173,766 | | | | 2,074,064 | | | | 74.1 | % | | | 74.1 | % |
Gateway Center | | | 2 | | | Gaithersburg | | | 44,551 | | | | 511,930 | | | | 74.5 | % | | | 74.5 | % |
Hillside I and II | | | 2 | | | Columbia | | | 85,631 | | | | 907,218 | | | | 74.4 | % | | | 74.4 | % |
Metro Park North | | | 4 | | | Rockville | | | 191,469 | | | | 3,291,256 | | | | 100.0 | % | | | 73.1 | % |
Patrick Center | | | 1 | | | Frederick | | | 66,269 | | | | 980,913 | | | | 77.1 | % | | | 77.1 | % |
Redland Corporate Center | | | 2 | | | Rockville | | | 349,267 | | | | 7,914,026 | | | | 100.0 | % | | | 91.4 | % |
TenThreeTwenty | | | 1 | | | Columbia | | | 136,193 | | | | 1,714,140 | | | | 79.9 | % | | | 79.9 | % |
West Park | | | 1 | | | Frederick | | | 28,333 | | | | 280,092 | | | | 85.1 | % | | | 83.3 | % |
Worman’s Mill Court | | | 1 | | | Frederick | | | 40,099 | | | | 381,225 | | | | 87.6 | % | | | 87.6 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / Weighted Average | | | 20 | | | | | | 1,217,952 | | | $ | 19,743,678 | | | | 89.2 | % | | | 82.5 | % |
Northern Virginia | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Atlantic Corporate Park | | | 2 | | | Sterling | | | 219,526 | | | $ | 1,505,661 | | | | 41.3 | % | | | 35.8 | % |
Cedar Hill | | | 2 | | | Tyson’s Corner | | | 102,632 | | | | 2,196,617 | | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
Enterprise Center | | | 4 | | | Chantilly | | | 187,710 | | | | 3,012,074 | | | | 86.6 | % | | | 86.0 | % |
Herndon Corporate Center | | | 4 | | | Herndon | | | 128,084 | | | | 1,535,945 | | | | 82.7 | % | | | 81.7 | % |
One Fair Oaks | | | 1 | | | Fairfax | | | 214,214 | | | | 5,284,315 | | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
Reston Business Campus | | | 4 | | | Reston | | | 82,372 | | | | 1,074,901 | | | | 83.2 | % | | | 76.8 | % |
Three Flint Hill | | | 1 | | | Oakton | | | 180,741 | | | | 2,976,204 | | | | 92.2 | % | | | 86.2 | % |
Van Buren Office Park | | | 5 | | | Herndon | | | 107,409 | | | | 1,154,879 | | | | 83.2 | % | | | 83.2 | % |
Windsor at Battlefield | | | 2 | | | Manassas | | | 155,511 | | | | 1,995,606 | | | | 90.3 | % | | | 90.3 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / Weighted Average | | | 25 | | | | | | 1,378,199 | | | $ | 20,736,202 | | | | 82.8 | % | | | 80.6 | % |
Southern Virginia | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Greenbrier Towers | | | 2 | | | Chesapeake | | | 171,566 | | | $ | 1,694,341 | | | | 83.6 | % | | | 83.6 | % |
Total / Weighted Average | | | 50 | | | | | | 3,270,407 | | | $ | 56,850,099 | | | | 86.8 | % | | | 83.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1750 H Street, NW | | | 1 | | | CBD—DC(3) | | | 112,269 | | | $ | 3,992,851 | | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
Aviation Business Park | | | 3 | | | Glen Burnie—MD | | | 120,285 | | | | 804,946 | | | | 45.9 | % | | | 45.9 | % |
Prosperity Metro Plaza | | | 2 | | | Merrifield—NOVA | | | 327,470 | | | | 6,209,576 | | | | 89.5 | % | | | 85.7 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / Weighted Average | | | 6 | | | | | | 560,024 | | | $ | 11,007,373 | | | | 82.2 | % | | | 80.0 | % |
(1) | Does not include space in development or redevelopment. |
(2) | Annualized cash basis rent at the end of the quarter, which is calculated as the contractual rent due under the terms of the lease, without taking into account rent abatements, is reflected on a triple-net equivalent basis, by deducting operating expense reimbursements that are included, along with base rent, in the contractual payments of the Company’s full service leases. |
(3) | CBD refers to the Central Business District and NoMa refers to North of Massachusetts Avenue. |
34
| | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33ebe/33ebed58e636b55c50d465433ab27acce53d780b" alt="LOGO" | | Business Park / Industrial Properties (unaudited) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Annualized | | | % | | | | |
Property (1) | | Buildings | | | Location | | Square Feet | | | Cash Basis Rent(2) | | | Leased | | | % Occupied | |
Maryland | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ammendale Business Park(3) | | | 7 | | | Beltsville | | | 312,846 | | | $ | 4,084,902 | | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
Gateway 270 West | | | 6 | | | Clarksburg | | | 255,917 | | | | 2,606,413 | | | | 73.5 | % | | | 67.6 | % |
Girard Business Center(4) | | | 7 | | | Gaithersburg | | | 297,422 | | | | 2,924,093 | | | | 83.7 | % | | | 79.9 | % |
Owings Mills Business Park(5) | | | 4 | | | Owings Mills | | | 180,475 | | | | 1,195,302 | | | | 53.4 | % | | | 42.4 | % |
Rumsey Center | | | 4 | | | Columbia | | | 134,689 | | | | 1,383,578 | | | | 94.9 | % | | | 94.9 | % |
Snowden Center | | | 5 | | | Columbia | | | 145,180 | | | $ | 2,157,448 | | | | 98.9 | % | | | 98.9 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / Weighted Average | | | 33 | | | | | | 1,326,529 | | | $ | 14,351,736 | | | | 84.3 | % | | | 80.8 | % |
Northern Virginia | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Corporate Campus at Ashburn Center | | | 3 | | | Ashburn | | | 194,184 | | | $ | 2,562,219 | | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
Gateway Centre Manassas | | | 3 | | | Manassas | | | 102,332 | | | | 638,848 | | | | 60.5 | % | | | 60.5 | % |
Linden Business Center | | | 3 | | | Manassas | | | 109,787 | | | | 1,042,336 | | | | 97.4 | % | | | 97.4 | % |
Newington Business Park Center(6) | | | 7 | | | Lorton | | | 254,148 | | | | 2,211,537 | | | | 79.1 | % | | | 79.1 | % |
Plaza 500(6) | | | 2 | | | Alexandria | | | 500,938 | | | | 5,129,453 | | | | 96.6 | % | | | 96.6 | % |
Prosperity Business Center | | | 1 | | | Merrifield | | | 71,343 | | | | 851,187 | | | | 92.5 | % | | | 92.5 | % |
Sterling Park Business Center(7) | | | 7 | | | Sterling | | | 474,809 | | | $ | 4,418,482 | | | | 94.9 | % | | | 94.9 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / Weighted Average | | | 26 | | | | | | 1,707,541 | | | $ | 16,854,061 | | | | 91.6 | % | | | 91.6 | % |
Southern Virginia | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Battlefield Corporate Center | | | 1 | | | Chesapeake | | | 96,720 | | | | 795,456 | | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
Chesterfield Business Center(8) | | | 11 | | | Richmond | | | 320,111 | | | $ | 1,704,889 | | | | 76.8 | % | | | 76.8 | % |
Crossways Commerce Center(9) | | | 9 | | | Chesapeake | | | 1,083,785 | | | | 11,433,563 | | | | 95.8 | % | | | 94.5 | % |
Greenbrier Business Park(10) | | | 4 | | | Chesapeake | | | 410,723 | | | | 3,815,891 | | | | 75.8 | % | | | 71.2 | % |
Hanover Business Center | | | 4 | | | Ashland | | | 183,868 | | | | 844,550 | | | | 70.4 | % | | | 70.4 | % |
Norfolk Commerce Park(11) | | | 3 | | | Norfolk | | | 261,823 | | | | 2,494,627 | | | | 89.8 | % | | | 89.6 | % |
Park Central | | | 3 | | | Richmond | | | 204,789 | | | | 2,008,045 | | | | 86.3 | % | | | 86.3 | % |
Virginia Technology Center | | | 1 | | | Glen Allen | | | 118,855 | | | | 1,286,607 | | | | 82.3 | % | | | 82.3 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / Weighted Average | | | 36 | | | | | | 2,680,674 | | | $ | 24,383,627 | | | | 87.0 | % | | | 85.7 | % |
Total / Weighted Average | | | 95 | | | | | | 5,714,744 | | | $ | 55,589,424 | | | | 87.7 | % | | | 86.3 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
RiversPark I and II | | | 6 | | | Columbia—MD | | | 307,984 | | | $ | 4,052,056 | | | | 94.7 | % | | | 90.9 | % |
(1) | Does not include space in development or redevelopment. |
(2) | Annualized cash basis rent at the end of the quarter, which is calculated as the contractual rent due under the terms of the lease, without taking into account rent abatements, is reflected on a triple-net equivalent basis, by deducting operating expense reimbursements that are included, along with base rent, in the contractual payments of the Company’s full service leases. |
(3) | Ammendale Business Park consists of Ammendale Commerce Center and Indian Creek Court. |
(4) | Girard Business Center consists of Girard Business Center and Girard Place. |
(5) | Owings Mills Business Park consists of Owings Mills Business Center and Owings Mills Commerce Center. |
(6) | Newington Business Park Center and Plaza 500 are classified as Industrial properties. |
(7) | Sterling Park Business Center consists of 22370/22400/22446/22455 Davis Drive and 403/405/22560 Glenn Drive. |
(8) | Chesterfield Business Center consists of Airpark Business Center, Chesterfield Business Center and Pine Glen. |
(9) | Crossways Commerce Center consists of the Coast Guard Building, Crossways Commerce Center I, Crossways Commerce Center II, Crossways I, Crossways II, 1434 Crossways Boulevard and 1408 Stephanie Way. |
(10) | Greenbrier Business Park consists of Greenbrier Technology Center I, Greenbrier Technology Center II and Greenbrier Circle Corporate Center. |
(11) | Norfolk Commerce Park consists of Norfolk Business Center, Norfolk Commerce Park II and Gateway II. |
35
| | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33ebe/33ebed58e636b55c50d465433ab27acce53d780b" alt="LOGO" | | Management Statements on Non-GAAP Supplemental Measures |
Investors and analysts following the real estate industry utilize funds from operations (“FFO”), net operating income (“NOI”), earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) and adjusted funds from operations (“AFFO”), variously defined, as supplemental performance measures.
The Company believes NOI, Same-Property NOI, EBITDA, FFO, Core FFO and AFFO are appropriate measures given their wide use by and relevance to investors and analysts. FFO, reflecting the assumption that real estate asset values rise or fall with market conditions, principally adjusts for the effects of GAAP depreciation/amortization of real estate assets. NOI provides a measure of rental operations and does not factor in depreciation/amortization and non-property specific expenses such as general and administrative expenses. EBITDA provides a further tool to evaluate the ability to incur and service debt and to fund dividends and other cash needs. AFFO provides a further tool to evaluate the ability to fund dividends. In addition, FFO, NOI, EBITDA and AFFO are commonly used in various ratios, pricing multiples/yields and returns and valuation calculations used to measure financial position, performance and value.
NOI
Management believes that NOI is a useful measure of the Company’s property operating performance. The Company defines NOI as operating revenues (rental, tenant reimbursements and other income) less property and related expenses (property expenses, real estate taxes and insurance). Other real estate investment trust (“REITs”) may use different methodologies for calculating NOI, and accordingly, the Company’s NOI may not be comparable to other REITs.
Because NOI excludes general and administrative expenses, interest expense, depreciation and amortization, gains and losses from property dispositions, discontinued operations and extraordinary items, it provides a performance measure that, when compared year over year, reflects the revenues and expenses directly associated with owning and operating commercial real estate properties and the impact to operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates and operating costs, providing perspective not immediately apparent from net income. The Company uses NOI to evaluate its operating performance since NOI allows the Company to evaluate the impact that factors such as occupancy levels, lease structure, lease rates and tenant base have on the Company’s results, margins and returns. In addition, management believes that NOI provides useful information to the investment community about the Company’s property and operating performance when compared to other REITs since NOI is generally recognized as a standard measure of property performance in the real estate industry.
However, NOI should not be viewed as a measure of the Company’s overall financial performance since it does not reflect general and administrative expenses, interest expense, depreciation and amortization costs, the level of capital expenditures and leasing costs necessary to maintain the operating performance of the Company’s properties.
SAME-PROPERTY NOI
The Company defines same-property NOI as NOI for the Company’s properties wholly owned during the entirety of the periods reported. Other REITs may use different methodologies for calculating same-property NOI and, accordingly, the Company’s same-property NOI may not be comparable to other REITs.
EBITDA
Management believes that EBITDA is a useful measure of the Company’s operating performance. EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.
Management considers EBITDA to be an appropriate supplemental performance measure since it represents earnings prior to the impact of depreciation, amortization, gain (loss) from property dispositions and loss on early retirement of debt. This calculation facilitates the review of income from operations without considering the effect of non-cash depreciation and amortization or the cost of debt.
FFO
Management believes that FFO is a useful measure of the Company’s operating performance. The Company computes FFO as defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, which states FFO should represent net income (loss) before minority interest (computed in accordance with GAAP) plus real estate related depreciation and amortization (excluding amortization of deferred financing costs) and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures, gains or losses on the sale of property and impairments to real estate assets. The Company also excludes, from its FFO calculation, any depreciation and amortization related to third parties from its consolidated joint ventures. Further, other REITs may use different methodologies for calculating FFO and, accordingly, the Company’s FFO may not be comparable to other REITs. The Company presents FFO per diluted share calculations that are based on the outstanding dilutive common shares plus the outstanding Operating Partnership units for the periods presented.
Management considers FFO a useful additional measure of performance for an equity REIT because it facilitates an understanding of the operating performance of its properties without giving effect to real estate depreciation and amortization, which assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, we believe that FFO provides a more meaningful and accurate indication of our performance. In addition, management believes that FFO provides useful information to the investment community about the Company’s financial performance when compared to other REITs since FFO is generally recognized as the industry standard for reporting the operations of REITs.
Core FFO
Management believes that the computation of FFO in accordance with NAREIT’s definition includes certain items that are not indicative of the results provided by the Company’s operating portfolio and affect the comparability of the Company’s period-over-period performance. These items include, but are not limited to, gains and losses on the retirement of debt, legal and accounting costs related to the Company’s prior internal investigation and the informal SEC inquiry, personnel separation costs, contingent consideration charges and acquisition costs.
AFFO
Management believes that AFFO is a useful measure of the Company’s liquidity. The Company computes AFFO by adding to FFO equity based compensation expense and the non-cash amortization of deferred financing costs and non-real estate depreciation, and then subtracting cash paid for any recurring tenant improvements, leasing commissions, and recurring capital expenditures, and eliminating the net effect of straight-line rents, deferred market rent and debt fair value amortization.
First generation costs include tenant improvements, leasing commissions and capital expenditures that were taken into consideration when underwriting the purchase of a property or incurred to bring the property to operating standard for its intended use. The Company also excludes development and redevelopment related expenditures. AFFO provides an additional perspective on the Company’s ability to fund cash needs and make distributions to shareholders by adjusting for the effect of these non-cash items included in FFO, as well as recurring capital expenditures and leasing costs. However, other REITs may use different methodologies for calculating AFFO and, accordingly, the Company’s AFFO may not be comparable to other REITs.
36