| CONSTELLATION BRANDS, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 21036P108 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | STZ | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 20-Jul-2021 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US21036P1084 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935455712 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1. | DIRECTOR | | | | | | | Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | 1 | | Christy Clark | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 2 | | Jennifer M. Daniels | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 3 | | Nicholas I. Fink | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 4 | | Jerry Fowden | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| | | | 5 | | Ernesto M. Hernandez | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 6 | | Susan S. Johnson | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 7 | | James A. Locke III | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| | | | 8 | | Jose M. Madero Garza | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 9 | | Daniel J. McCarthy | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 10 | | William A. Newlands | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Over-Boarded (CEO) According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the CEO, being the most critical position in a company, should hold no more than one other public directorship to ensure the effective and prudent exercise of his/her fiduciary duties as a CEO and that his/her integrity and efficiency are not compromised. |
| | | | 11 | | Richard Sands | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 12 | | Robert Sands | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Rating of Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Rating. We believe that |
| | | cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the leadership of the Chairman of the Board. |
| | | | 13 | | Judy A. Schmeling | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | To ratify the selection of KPMG LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending February 28, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Rating we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | To approve, by an advisory vote, the compensation of the Company's named executive officers as disclosed in the Proxy Statement. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | Stockholder proposal regarding diversity. | | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that a company's success depends upon its ability to embrace diversity and to draw upon the skills, expertise and experience of its workforce. As such, we believe that the adoption of this proposal is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. As such, in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 296 | | | | | 0 | | | 05-Jul-2021 | 05-Jul-2021 | |
| LINDE PLC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | G5494J103 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | LIN | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 26-Jul-2021 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | IE00BZ12WP82 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935428234 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Reitzle | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Over-Boarded (Board Chair) According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Chairman, being responsible for the leadership of the Board and the creation of the conditions necessary for overall board and individual director effectiveness, should hold no more than one other public directorship to ensure the valuable and prudent exercise of his/her fiduciary duties as a Chairman and that his/her integrity and efficiency are not compromised. |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Stephen F. Angel | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Prof. DDr. Ann-Kristin Achleitner | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Prof. Dr. Clemens Börsig | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Dr. Nance K. Dicciani | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Dr. Thomas Enders | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Franz Fehrenbach | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Edward G. Galante | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Larry D. McVay | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Dr. Victoria Ossadnik | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Prof. Dr. Martin H. Richenhagen | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1L. | Election of Director: Robert L. Wood | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2A. | To ratify, on an advisory and non-binding basis, the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers ("PWC") as the independent auditor. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Rating we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 2B. | To authorize the Board, acting through the Audit Committee, to determine PWC's remuneration. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Rating we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | To approve, on an advisory and non- binding basis, the compensation of Linde plc's Named Executive Officers, as disclosed in the 2021 Proxy Statement. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | To approve, on an advisory and non- binding basis, a Directors' Remuneration Policy for the Company's Directors as required under Irish law. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5. | To approve, on an advisory and non- binding basis, the Directors' Remuneration Report for the financial year ended December 31, 2020 as required under Irish law. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 6. | To approve the 2021 Linde plc Long Term Incentive Plan. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 7. | To determine the price range at which the Company can re-allot shares that it acquires as treasury shares under Irish law. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 917 | | | | | 0 | | | 05-Jul-2021 | 05-Jul-2021 | |
| ELECTRONIC ARTS INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 285512109 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | EA | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 12-Aug-2021 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US2855121099 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935466804 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director to hold office for a one- year term: Kofi A. Bruce | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director to hold office for a one- year term: Leonard S. Coleman | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1C. | Election of Director to hold office for a one- year term: Jeffrey T. Huber | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1D. | Election of Director to hold office for a one- year term: Talbott Roche | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director to hold office for a one- year term: Richard A. Simonson | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1F. | Election of Director to hold office for a one- year term: Luis A. Ubinas | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1G. | Election of Director to hold office for a one- year term: Heidi J. Ueberroth | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1H. | Election of Director to hold office for a one- year term: Andrew Wilson | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Combined CEO and Board Chair Positions and the Company Earns a Board Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having the CEO or former CEO serve as the Chairman of the Board. Consequently, we prefer that companies focus on the following areas to improve its corporate governance practices: separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO, hold annual director elections, have one class of voting stock only, have key board committees consisting of independent directors and majority of independent directors on board and include non-binding compensation vote on agenda to further ensure board independence and accountability. |
| 2. | Advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent public registered accounting firm for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Rating we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Amendment and Restatement of the Company's Certificate of Incorporation to permit stockholders to act by written consent. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5. | To consider and vote upon a stockholder proposal, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting, on whether to allow stockholders to act by written consent. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We have determined that it is a positive corporate governance measure to allow the stockholders to have the ability to take action by written consent if such written consent or consents sets forth the action to be taken and is signed by the holders of outstanding stock having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting at which all shares entitled to vote on the matter were present and voted. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 197 | | | | | 0 | | | 01-Aug-2021 | 01-Aug-2021 | |
| THE J. M. SMUCKER COMPANY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 832696405 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | SJM | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 18-Aug-2021 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US8326964058 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935468264 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director whose term of office will expire in 2022: Susan E. Chapman-Hughes | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1B. | Election of Director whose term of office will expire in 2022: Paul J. Dolan | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1C. | Election of Director whose term of office will expire in 2022: Jay L. Henderson | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director whose term of office will expire in 2022: Kirk L. Perry | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1E. | Election of Director whose term of office will expire in 2022: Sandra Pianalto | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director whose term of office will expire in 2022: Alex Shumate | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director whose term of office will expire in 2022: Mark T. Smucker | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director whose term of office will expire in 2022: Richard K. Smucker | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director whose term of office will expire in 2022: Timothy P. Smucker | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director whose term of office will expire in 2022: Jodi L. Taylor | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director whose term of office will expire in 2022: Dawn C. Willoughby | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Ratification of appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company's Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the 2022 fiscal year. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Rating we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Advisory approval of the Company's executive compensation. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 497 | | | | | 0 | | | 03-Aug-2021 | 03-Aug-2021 | |
| MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 595017104 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | MCHP | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 24-Aug-2021 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US5950171042 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935474445 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1.1 | Election of Director: Matthew W. Chapman | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliated Outside director serving as a member of the Audit Committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, with the exception of diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1.2 | Election of Director: Esther L. Johnson | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1.3 | Election of Director: Karlton D. Johnson | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1.4 | Election of Director: Wade F. Meyercord | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliated Outside director serving as a member of the Audit and Compensation Committees According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, with the exception of diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 1.5 | Election of Director: Ganesh Moorthy | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1.6 | Election of Director: Karen M. Rapp | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1.7 | Election of Director: Steve Sanghi | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Chairman of the Board and the Company earns a Cyber Security Risk Rating of Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Rating. We believe that cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the leadership of the Chairman of the Board. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2. | Proposal to approve an amendment and restatement of our Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock for the purpose of effecting a two-for-one forward stock split. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Proposal to approve an amendment and restatement of our 2004 Equity Incentive Plan to extend the term of the plan by ten years, to August 24, 2031. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | Proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of Microchip for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Rating we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 5. | Proposal to approve, on an advisory (non- binding) basis, the compensation of our named executives. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 754 | | | | | 0 | | | 12-Aug-2021 | 12-Aug-2021 | |
| NORTONLIFELOCK INC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 668771108 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | NLOK | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 14-Sep-2021 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US6687711084 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935476932 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Sue Barsamian | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Eric K. Brandt | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Frank E. Dangeard | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F3 Over-Boarded (Board Chair) According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, the Chairman, being responsible for the leadership of the Board and the creation of the conditions necessary for overall board and individual director effectiveness, should hold no more than one other public directorship to ensure the valuable and prudent exercise of his fiduciary duties as a Chairman and that his integrity and efficiency are not compromised. F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Nora M. Denzel | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Peter A. Feld | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Kenneth Y. Hao | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Emily Heath | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Vincent Pilette | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Sherrese Smith | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2022 fiscal year. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Rating we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Advisory vote to approve executive compensation. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | Stockholder proposal regarding independent board chairman. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that there is an inherent potential conflict in having an Inside director serve as the Chairman of the board. Consequently, we prefer that companies separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO and that the Chairman be independent to further ensure board independence and accountability. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 2,298 | | | | 0 | | | 30-Aug-2021 | 30-Aug-2021 | |
| INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 46120E602 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Special | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | ISRG | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 20-Sep-2021 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US46120E6023 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935489434 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1. | TO APPROVE THE COMPANY'S AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED SHARES OF COMMON STOCK FOR THE PURPOSE OF EFFECTING A THREE-FOR-ONE STOCK SPLIT. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 130 | | | | | 0 | | | 06-Sep-2021 | 06-Sep-2021 | |
| FEDEX CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 31428X106 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | FDX | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 27-Sep-2021 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US31428X1063 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935484016 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: MARVIN R. ELLISON | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: SUSAN PATRICIA GRIFFITH | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: KIMBERLY A. JABAL | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: SHIRLEY ANN JACKSON | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: R. BRAD MARTIN | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1F. | Election of Director: JOSHUA COOPER RAMO | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1G. | Election of Director: SUSAN C. SCHWAB | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: FREDERICK W. SMITH | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: DAVID P. STEINER | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| IJ. | Election of Director: RAJESH SUBRAMANIAM | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: PAUL S. WALSH | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 2. | Advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as FedEx's independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Rating we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Stockholder proposal regarding independent board chairman. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having an Inside director serve as the Chairman of the board. Consequently, we prefer that companies separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO and that the Chairman be independent to further ensure board independence and accountability. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 5. | Stockholder proposal regarding report on alignment between company values and electioneering contributions. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 6. | Stockholder proposal regarding lobbying activity and expenditure report. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 7. | Stockholder proposal regarding assessing inclusion in the workplace. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that a company's success depends upon its ability to embrace diversity and to draw upon the skills, expertise, and experience of its workforce. As such, we believe that the adoption of this proposal is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. As such, in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 8. | Stockholder proposal regarding shareholder ratification of termination pay. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the Company's compensation practices have been and will continue to be a key factor in the ability to deliver strong results. Furthermore, we believe that adopting this proposal would put the Company at a competitive advantage in recruiting and retaining executive talent and that it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders for the independent Compensation Committee to retain the flexibility to design and administer competitive compensation program. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 678 | | | | | 0 | | | 20-Sep-2021 | 20-Sep-2021 | |
| GENERAL MILLS, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 370334104 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | GIS | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 28-Sep-2021 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US3703341046 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935483987 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: R. Kerry Clark | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1B. | Election of Director: David M. Cordani | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Jeffrey L. Harmening | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Rating of Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Rating. We believe that cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the leadership of the Chairman of the Board. |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Maria G. Henry | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Jo Ann Jenkins | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Elizabeth C. Lempres | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Diane L. Neal | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Steve Odland | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Maria A. Sastre | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Eric D. Sprunk | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Jorge A. Uribe | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 2. | Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation. | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Ratify Appointment of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Rating we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Amendment and Restatement of Our Certificate of Incorporation to Eliminate Supermajority Voting Provisions. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 880 | | | | | 0 | | | 13-Sep-2021 | 13-Sep-2021 | |
| NIKE, Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 654106103 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | NKE | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 06-Oct-2021 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US6541061031 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935484624 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Class B Director: Alan B. Graf, Jr. | | Management | Abstain | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1B. | Election of Class B Director: Peter B. Henry | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Class B Director: Michelle A. Peluso | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | To approve executive compensation by an advisory vote. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Rating we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | To consider a shareholder proposal regarding political contributions disclosure, if properly presented at the meeting. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5. | To consider a shareholder proposal regarding a human rights impact assessment, if properly presented at the meeting. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that human rights are of the utmost importance for their own sake as well as for the enhancement of economic potential of a nation. By adopting these standards, Companies will embody good corporate governance responsibility and enhance shareholder value. As a result, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 6. | To consider a shareholder proposal regarding supplemental pay equity disclosure, if properly presented at the meeting. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 7. | To consider a shareholder proposal regarding diversity and inclusion efforts reporting, if properly presented at the meeting. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that a company's success depends upon its ability to embrace diversity and to draw upon the skills, expertise and experience of its workforce. As such, we believe that adoption of this proposal is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. As such, in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 2,213 | | | | 0 | | | 21-Sep-2021 | 21-Sep-2021 | |
| TESLA, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 88160R101 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | TSLA | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 07-Oct-2021 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US88160R1014 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935486452 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1.1 | Election of Class II Director: James Murdoch | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1.2 | Election of Class II Director: Kimbal Musk | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Tesla proposal for adoption of amendments to certificate of incorporation to reduce director terms to two years. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that staggered terms for directors increase the difficulty for shareholders of making fundamental changes to the composition and behavior of a board. We prefer that the entire board of a company be elected annually to provide appropriate responsiveness to shareholders. We recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Tesla proposal for adoption of amendments to certificate of incorporation and bylaws to eliminate applicable supermajority voting requirements. | Management | For | | | None | | | | | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | Tesla proposal to ratify the appointment of independent registered public accounting firm. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Rating we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 5. | Stockholder proposal regarding reduction of director terms to one year. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After evaluating the details given about the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we believe that corporate governance procedures and practices, and the level of accountability that the Company imposes, are closely related to financial performance. It is intuitive that when directors are accountable for their actions, they perform better. We therefore prefer that the entire board of a company be elected annually to provide appropriate responsiveness to shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 6. | Stockholder proposal regarding additional reporting on diversity and inclusion efforts. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that a company's success depends upon its ability to embrace diversity and to draw upon the skills, expertise and experience of its workforce. As such, we believe that adoption of this proposal is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. In accordance with Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 7. | Stockholder proposal regarding reporting on employee arbitration. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 8. | Stockholder proposal regarding assigning responsibility for strategic oversight of human capital management to an independent board-level committee. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the adoption of the proposal will enhance the Company's response to human capital management. Accordingly, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. | |
| 9. | Stockholder proposal regarding additional reporting on human rights. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the adoption of a more comprehensive human rights policy, coupled with implementation, enforcement, independent monitoring, and transparent, comprehensive reporting will assure shareholders of the Company's global leadership. We recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 131 | | | | | 0 | | | 27-Sep-2021 | 27-Sep-2021 | |
| 19-9867MS | | | | | SC ZIEGLER FAMCO FUND AND MS | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 780 | | | | | 0 | | | 27-Sep-2021 | 27-Sep-2021 | |
| THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 742718109 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | PG | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 12-Oct-2021 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US7427181091 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935488002 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | ELECTION OF DIRECTOR: B. Marc Allen | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | ELECTION OF DIRECTOR: Angela F. Braly | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | ELECTION OF DIRECTOR: Amy L. Chang | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | ELECTION OF DIRECTOR: Joseph Jimenez | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | ELECTION OF DIRECTOR: Christopher Kempczinski | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | ELECTION OF DIRECTOR: Debra L. Lee | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | ELECTION OF DIRECTOR: Terry J. Lundgren | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | ELECTION OF DIRECTOR: Christine M. McCarthy | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | ELECTION OF DIRECTOR: Jon R. Moeller | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | ELECTION OF DIRECTOR: David S. Taylor | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | ELECTION OF DIRECTOR: Margaret C. Whitman | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1L. | ELECTION OF DIRECTOR: Patricia A. Woertz | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Ratify Appointment of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Rating we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Advisory Vote to Approve the Company's Executive Compensation (the "Say on Pay" vote). | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | Shareholder Proposal - Inclusion of Non- Management Employees on Director Nominee Candidate Lists. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 2,261 | | | | 0 | | | 21-Sep-2021 | 21-Sep-2021 | |
| PAYCHEX, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 704326107 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | PAYX | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 14-Oct-2021 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US7043261079 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935489725 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: B. Thomas Golisano | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Thomas F. Bonadio | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Joseph G. Doody | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1D. | Election of Director: David J.S. Flaschen | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Pamela A. Joseph | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Martin Mucci | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Kevin A. Price | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Joseph M. Tucci | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Joseph M. Velli | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Kara Wilson | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP TO SERVE AS THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Rating we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 904 | | | | | 0 | | | 23-Sep-2021 | 23-Sep-2021 | |
| CINTAS CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 172908105 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | CTAS | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 26-Oct-2021 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US1729081059 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935495855 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Gerald S. Adolph | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1B. | Election of Director: John F. Barrett | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Melanie W. Barstad | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Karen L. Carnahan | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Robert E. Coletti | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Scott D. Farmer | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Rating of Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Rating. We believe that cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the leadership of the Chairman of the Board. |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Joseph Scaminace | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Todd M. Schneider | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Ronald W. Tysoe | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 2. | To approve, on an advisory basis, named executive officer compensation. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | To ratify Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Rating we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | A shareholder proposal regarding a simple majority vote, if properly presented at the meeting. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: For the reasons stated below and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we believe that the advantages of eliminating supermajority provisions outweigh the benefits of maintaining it as a voting standard. We believe that a simple majority vote will strengthen the Company's corporate governance practice. Contrary to supermajority voting, a simple majority standard will give the shareholders equal and fair representation in the Company by limiting the power of shareholders who own a large stake in the entity, therefore, paving way for a more meaningful voting outcome. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 245 | | | | | 0 | | | 06-Oct-2021 | 06-Oct-2021 | |
| KLA CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 482480100 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | KLAC | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 03-Nov-2021 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US4824801009 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935497645 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A | Election of Director to serve for a one-year term: Edward Barnholt | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1B | Election of Director to serve for a one-year term: Robert Calderoni | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1C | Election of Director to serve for a one-year term: Jeneanne Hanley | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D | Election of Director to serve for a one-year term: Emiko Higashi | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E | Election of Director to serve for a one-year term: Kevin Kennedy | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1F | Election of Director to serve for a one-year term: Gary Moore | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G | Election of Director to serve for a one-year term: Marie Myers | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H | Election of Director to serve for a one-year term: Kiran Patel | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I | Election of Director to serve for a one-year term: Victor Peng | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J | Election of Director to serve for a one-year term: Robert Rango | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K | Election of Director to serve for a one-year term: Richard Wallace | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2 | To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Rating we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3 | To approve on a non-binding, advisory basis our named executive officer compensation. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 122 | | | | | 0 | | | 20-Oct-2021 | 20-Oct-2021 | |
| CHUBB LIMITED | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | H1467J104 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Special | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | CB | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 03-Nov-2021 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | CH0044328745 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935498128 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1 | Ratification of the share repurchase program ending June 30, 2022. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2 | Reduction of share capital. | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| A | If a new agenda item or a new proposal for an existing agenda item is put before the meeting, I/we hereby authorize and instruct the independent proxy to vote as follows. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,244 | | | | 0 | | | 29-Oct-2021 | 29-Oct-2021 | |
| NORTONLIFELOCK INC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 668771108 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Special | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | NLOK | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 04-Nov-2021 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US6687711084 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935505911 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1. | To approve the issuance of New NortonLifeLock Shares to Avast shareholders in connection with the Merger (the "Share Issuance Proposal"). | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | To adjourn the special meeting to a later date or time, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies in the event there are insufficient votes at the time of such adjournment to approve the Share Issuance Proposal (the "Adjournment Proposal"). | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 2,282 | | | | 0 | | | 29-Oct-2021 | 29-Oct-2021 | |
| NORTONLIFELOCK INC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 668771108 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Special | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | NLOK | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 04-Nov-2021 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US6687711084 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935509476 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1. | To approve the issuance of New NortonLifeLock Shares to Avast shareholders in connection with the Merger (the "Share Issuance Proposal"). | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | To adjourn the special meeting to a later date or time, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies in the event there are insufficient votes at the time of such adjournment to approve the Share Issuance Proposal (the "Adjournment Proposal"). | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 2,282 | | | | 0 | | | 29-Oct-2021 | 29-Oct-2021 | |
| LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 512807108 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | LRCX | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 08-Nov-2021 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US5128071082 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935496946 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1. | DIRECTOR | | | | | | | Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | 1 | | Sohail U. Ahmed | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 2 | | Timothy M. Archer | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 3 | | Eric K. Brandt | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| | | | 4 | | Michael R. Cannon | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| | | | 5 | | Catherine P. Lego | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 6 | | Bethany J. Mayer | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 7 | | Abhijit Y. Talwalkar | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Over-Boarded (Board Chair) According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, the Chairman, being responsible for the leadership of the Board and the creation of the conditions necessary for overall board and individual director effectiveness, should hold no more than one other public directorship to ensure the valuable and prudent exercise of his/her fiduciary duties as a Chairman and that his/her integrity and efficiency are not compromised. |
| | | | 8 | | Lih Shyng (Rick L) Tsai | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 9 | | Leslie F. Varon | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Advisory vote to approve the compensation of the named executive officers of Lam Research, or "Say on Pay." | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Rating we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 120 | | | | | 0 | | | 20-Oct-2021 | 20-Oct-2021 | |
| AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 053015103 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | ADP | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 10-Nov-2021 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US0530151036 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935497570 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Peter Bisson | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Richard T. Clark | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Linnie M. Haynesworth | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: John P. Jones | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Francine S. Katsoudas | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Nazzic S. Keene | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Thomas J. Lynch | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Scott F. Powers | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1I. | Election of Director: William J. Ready | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Carlos A. Rodriguez | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Sandra S. Wijnberg | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation. | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Ratification of the Appointment of Auditors. | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Rating we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Stockholder proposal, if properly presented at the meeting, to prepare a Report on Workforce Engagement in Governance. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 619 | | | | | 0 | | | 02-Nov-2021 | 02-Nov-2021 | |
| ORACLE CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 68389X105 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | ORCL | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 10-Nov-2021 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US68389X1054 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935498027 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1. | DIRECTOR | | | | | | | Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | 1 | | Jeffrey S. Berg | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| | | | 2 | | Michael J. Boskin | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| | | | 3 | | Safra A. Catz | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 4 | | Bruce R. Chizen | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| | | | 5 | | George H. Conrades | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its |
| | | shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| | | | 6 | | Lawrence J. Ellison | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Rating of Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Rating. We believe that cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the leadership of the Chairman of the Board. |
| | | | 7 | | Rona A. Fairhead | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 8 | | Jeffrey O. Henley | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 9 | | Renee J. James | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 10 | | Charles W. Moorman IV | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| | | | 11 | | Leon E. Panetta | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| | | | 12 | | William G. Parrett | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 13 | | Naomi O. Seligman | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| | | | 14 | | Vishal Sikka | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Advisory Vote to Approve the Compensation of our Named Executive Officers. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Approve an Amendment to the Oracle Corporation 2020 Equity Incentive Plan. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account the maximum amount of shareholder equity dilution this proposal could cause, as well as both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the passage of this plan as proposed by the board of directors. We recommend the board seek to align CEO pay more closely with the performance of the company and work to reduce the cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Rating we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 5. | Stockholder Proposal Regarding Racial Equity Audit. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that a company's success depends upon its ability to embrace diversity. As such, we believe that adoption of this proposal is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. As such, in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 6. | Stockholder Proposal Regarding Independent Board Chair. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having an Inside director serve as the Chairman of the board. Consequently, we prefer that companies separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO and that the Chairman be independent to further ensure board independence and accountability. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 7. | Stockholder Proposal Regarding Political Spending. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 2,334 | | | | 0 | | | 02-Nov-2021 | 02-Nov-2021 | |
| THE ESTEE LAUDER COMPANIES INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 518439104 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | EL | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 12-Nov-2021 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US5184391044 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935498558 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Class I Director: Rose Marie Bravo | | Management | Abstain | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1B. | Election of Class I Director: Paul J. Fribourg | | Management | Abstain | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1C. | Election of Class I Director: Jennifer Hyman | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Class I Director: Barry S. Sternlicht | | Management | Abstain | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 2. | Ratification of appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent auditors for the 2022 fiscal year. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Rating we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Advisory vote to approve executive compensation. | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 306 | | | | | 0 | | | 28-Oct-2021 | 28-Oct-2021 | |
| THE CLOROX COMPANY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 189054109 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | CLX | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 17-Nov-2021 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US1890541097 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935503208 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Amy Banse | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Richard H. Carmona | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Spencer C. Fleischer | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Esther Lee | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: A.D. David Mackay | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Paul Parker | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Linda Rendle | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Matthew J. Shattock | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Over-Boarded (Board Chair) According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Chairman, being responsible for the leadership of the Board and the creation of the conditions necessary for overall board and individual director effectiveness, should hold no more than one other public directorship to ensure the valuable and prudent exercise of his/her fiduciary duties as a Chairman and that his/her integrity and efficiency are not compromised. |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Kathryn Tesija | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Russell Weiner | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Christopher J. Williams | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Ratification of the Selection of Ernst & Young LLP as the Clorox Company's Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Rating we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Approval of the Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Incentive Plan. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5. | Shareholder Proposal Requesting Non- Management Employees on Director Nominee Candidate Lists. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 324 | | | | | 0 | | | 02-Nov-2021 | 02-Nov-2021 | |
| RESMED INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 761152107 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | RMD | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 18-Nov-2021 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US7611521078 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935501254 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Re-election of Director to serve until 2022 annual meeting: Karen Drexler | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Re-election of Director to serve until 2022 annual meeting: Michael Farrell | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Re-election of Director to serve until 2022 annual meeting: Peter Farrell | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Over-Boarded (Board Chair) According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Chairman, being responsible for the leadership of the Board and the creation of the conditions necessary for overall board and individual director effectiveness, should hold no more than one other public directorship to ensure the valuable and prudent exercise of his/her fiduciary duties as a Chairman and that his/her integrity and efficiency are not compromised. |
| 1D. | Re-election of Director to serve until 2022 annual meeting: Harjit Gill | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Re-election of Director to serve until 2022 annual meeting: Ron Taylor | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1F. | Election of Director to serve until 2022 annual meeting: John Hernandez | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director to serve until 2022 annual meeting: Desney Tan | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Ratify our selection of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Rating we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to our named executive officers, as disclosed in the proxy statement ("say-on-pay"). | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 190 | | | | | 0 | | | 02-Nov-2021 | 02-Nov-2021 | |
| BROADRIDGE FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 11133T103 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | BR | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 18-Nov-2021 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US11133T1034 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935503563 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director to serve until the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders: Leslie A. Brun | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director to serve until the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders: Pamela L. Carter | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director to serve until the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders: Richard J. Daly | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director to serve until the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders: Robert N. Duelks | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1E. | Election of Director to serve until the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders: Melvin L. Flowers | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director to serve until the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders: Timothy C. Gokey | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director to serve until the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders: Brett A. Keller | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director to serve until the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders: Maura A. Markus | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director to serve until the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders: Annette L. Nazareth | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director to serve until the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders: Thomas J. Perna | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1K. | Election of Director to serve until the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders: Amit K. Zavery | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Advisory vote to approve the compensation of the Company's Named Executive Officers (the Say on Pay Vote). | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company's independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Rating we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 452 | | | | | 0 | | | 08-Nov-2021 | 08-Nov-2021 | |
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 594918104 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | MSFT | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 30-Nov-2021 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US5949181045 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935505480 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Reid G. Hoffman | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Hugh F. Johnston | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Teri L. List | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Satya Nadella | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Rating of Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Rating. We believe that cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the leadership of the Chairman of the Board. |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Sandra E. Peterson | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Penny S. Pritzker | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Carlos A. Rodriguez | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Charles W. Scharf | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1I. | Election of Director: John W. Stanton | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: John W. Thompson | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Emma N. Walmsley | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1L. | Election of Director: Padmasree Warrior | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 2. | Advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Approve Employee Stock Purchase Plan. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | Ratification of the Selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our Independent Auditor for Fiscal Year 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Rating we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 5. | Shareholder Proposal - Report on median pay gaps across race and gender. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that public disclosure on discrimination in compensation and employment opportunities for women and minorities is an effective incentive to develop and maintain effective programs to break the glass ceiling barriers. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 6. | Shareholder Proposal - Report on effectiveness of workplace sexual harassment policies. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that approval of the proposal will enable the Company to avoid legal and reputational risk and by creating a culture of accountability and transparency, protecting employees from harassment and discrimination. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 7. | Shareholder Proposal - Prohibition on sales of facial recognition technology to all government entities. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 8. | Shareholder Proposal - Report on implementation of the Fair Chance Business Pledge. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that approval of the proposal will allow the Company to protect the Company's brand value and reputation on diversity issues. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 9. | Shareholder Proposal - Report on how lobbying activities align with company policies. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,527 | | | | 0 | | | 18-Nov-2021 | 18-Nov-2021 | |
| 19-9867MS | | | | | SC ZIEGLER FAMCO FUND AND MS | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 6,340 | | | | 0 | | | 18-Nov-2021 | 18-Nov-2021 | |
| CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 17275R102 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | CSCO | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 13-Dec-2021 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US17275R1023 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935511469 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: M. Michele Burns | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Wesley G. Bush | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Michael D. Capellas | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Mark Garrett | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: John D. Harris II | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Dr. Kristina M. Johnson | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Roderick C. McGeary | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention |
| | | Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Charles H. Robbins | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Combined CEO and Board Chair Positions and the Company Earns a Board Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having the CEO or former CEO serve as the Chairman of the Board. Consequently, we prefer that companies focus on the following areas to improve its corporate governance practices: separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO, hold annual director elections, have one class of voting stock only, have key board committees consisting of independent directors and majority of independent directors on board and include non-binding compensation vote on agenda to further ensure board independence and accountability. Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Rating of Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Rating. We believe that cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the leadership of the Chairman of the Board. |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Brenton L. Saunders | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Dr. Lisa T. Su | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Marianna Tessel | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Approval, on an advisory basis, of executive compensation. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Cisco's independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Rating we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Approval to have Cisco's Board amend Cisco's proxy access bylaw to remove the stockholder aggregation limit. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval. We believe that because the board of directors serves as the representatives of shareholders, shareholders should have the right to nominate their own representatives. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 5,752 | | | | 0 | | | 01-Dec-2021 | 01-Dec-2021 | |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 595112103 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | MU | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 13-Jan-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US5951121038 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935528717 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | ELECTION OF DIRECTOR: Richard M. Beyer | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | ELECTION OF DIRECTOR: Lynn A. Dugle | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | ELECTION OF DIRECTOR: Steven J. Gomo | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | ELECTION OF DIRECTOR: Linnie Haynesworth | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | ELECTION OF DIRECTOR: Mary Pat McCarthy | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | ELECTION OF DIRECTOR: Sanjay Mehrotra | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | ELECTION OF DIRECTOR: Robert E. Switz | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Over-Boarded (Board Chair) According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Chairman, being responsible for the leadership of the Board and the creation of the conditions necessary for overall board and individual director effectiveness, should hold no more than one other public directorship to ensure the valuable and prudent exercise of his/her fiduciary duties as a Chairman and that his/her integrity and efficiency are not compromised. Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1H. | ELECTION OF DIRECTOR: MaryAnn Wright | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | PROPOSAL BY THE COMPANY TO APPROVE A NON-BINDING RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AS DESCRIBED IN THE PROXY STATEMENT. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | PROPOSAL BY THE COMPANY TO RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM OF THE COMPANY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 1, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Rating we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 845 | | | | | 0 | | | 22-Dec-2021 | 22-Dec-2021 | |
| INTUIT INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 461202103 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | INTU | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 20-Jan-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US4612021034 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935527993 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Eve Burton | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Scott D. Cook | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Richard L. Dalzell | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Sasan K. Goodarzi | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Deborah Liu | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Tekedra Mawakana | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Suzanne Nora Johnson | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| | | Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Dennis D. Powell | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Brad D. Smith | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Thomas Szkutak | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Raul Vazquez | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1L. | Election of Director: Jeff Weiner | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 2. | Advisory vote to approve Intuit's executive compensation (say-on-pay). | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as Intuit's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending July 31, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Rating we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Approve the Amended and Restated 2005 Equity Incentive Plan to, among other things, increase the share reserve by an additional 18,000,000 shares and extend the term of the plan by an additional five years. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account the maximum amount of shareholder equity dilution this proposal could cause, as well as both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the passage of this plan as proposed by the board of directors. We recommend the board seek to align CEO pay more closely with the performance of the company and work to reduce the cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 493 | | | | | 0 | | | 10-Jan-2022 | 10-Jan-2022 | |
| COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 22160K105 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | COST | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 20-Jan-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US22160K1051 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935530849 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Susan L. Decker | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Kenneth D. Denman | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Richard A. Galanti | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Hamilton E. James | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: W. Craig Jelinek | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Sally Jewell | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Charles T. Munger | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Jeffrey S. Raikes | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1I. | Election of Director: John W. Stanton | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Maggie Wilderotter | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Ratification of selection of independent auditors. | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Rating we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Approval, on an advisory basis, of executive compensation. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | Shareholder proposal regarding charitable giving reporting. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5. | Shareholder proposal regarding the adoption of GHG emissions reduction targets. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that setting clear-cut goals will help the Company reduce its regulatory risk related to GHG emissions, financial risk by decreasing volatility of energy prices, and overall expenditure on energy by implementing a disciplined business strategy to cut emissions from its operations. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' SRI Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 6. | Shareholder proposal regarding report on racial justice and food equity. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that a company's success depends upon its ability to embrace diversity and to draw upon the skills, expertise and experience of its workforce. As such, we believe that adoption of this proposal is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. As such, in accordance with the Egan-Jones' SRI Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 147 | | | | | 0 | | | 10-Jan-2022 | 10-Jan-2022 | |
| 19-9867MS | | | | | SC ZIEGLER FAMCO FUND AND MS | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 340 | | | | | 0 | | | 10-Jan-2022 | 10-Jan-2022 | |
| VISA INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 92826C839 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | V | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 25-Jan-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US92826C8394 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935531550 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Lloyd A. Carney | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Mary B. Cranston | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Francisco Javier Fernández-Carbajal | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Alfred F. Kelly, Jr. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Ramon Laguarta | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: John F. Lundgren | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Robert W. Matschullat | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Denise M. Morrison | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Linda J. Rendle | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Maynard G. Webb, Jr. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to our named executive officers. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Rating we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 324 | | | | | 0 | | | 10-Jan-2022 | 10-Jan-2022 | |
| 19-9867MS | | | | | SC ZIEGLER FAMCO FUND AND MS | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,360 | | | | 0 | | | 10-Jan-2022 | 10-Jan-2022 | |
| BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 075887109 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | BDX | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 25-Jan-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US0758871091 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935535128 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Catherine M. Burzik | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Carrie L. Byington | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: R. Andrew Eckert | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Claire M. Fraser | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Jeffrey W. Henderson | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Christopher Jones | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Marshall O. Larsen | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| | | Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1H. | Election of Director: David F. Melcher | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Thomas E. Polen | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Claire Pomeroy | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Timothy M. Ring | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1L. | Election of Director: Bertram L. Scott | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 2. | Ratification of the selection of the independent registered public accounting firm. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Rating we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | A shareholder proposal seeking to lower the ownership threshold required to call a special shareholders meeting, if properly presented at the meeting. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 924 | | | | | 0 | | | 05-Jan-2022 | 05-Jan-2022 | |
| ACCENTURE LLP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | G1151C101 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | ACN | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 26-Jan-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | IE00B4BNMY34 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935534405 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Appointment of Director: Jaime Ardila | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Appointment of Director: Nancy McKinstry | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Appointment of Director: Beth E. Mooney | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Appointment of Director: Gilles C. Pélisson | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1E. | Appointment of Director: Paula A. Price | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Appointment of Director: Venkata (Murthy) Renduchintala | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Appointment of Director: Arun Sarin | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Appointment of Director: Julie Sweet | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Appointment of Director: Frank K. Tang | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Appointment of Director: Tracey T. Travis | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | To approve, in a non-binding vote, the compensation of our named executive officers. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | To approve an amendment to the Amended and Restated Accenture plc 2010 Share Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares available for issuance thereunder. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | To ratify, in a non-binding vote, the appointment of KPMG LLP ("KPMG") as independent auditors of Accenture and to authorize, in a binding vote, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors to determine KPMG's remuneration. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Rating we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 5. | To grant the Board of Directors the authority to issue shares under Irish law. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 6. | To grant the Board of Directors the authority to opt-out of pre- emption rights under Irish law. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 7. | To determine the price range at which Accenture can re-allot shares that it acquires as treasury shares under Irish law. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 573 | | | | | 0 | | | 10-Jan-2022 | 10-Jan-2022 | |
| D.R. HORTON, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 23331A109 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | DHI | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 26-Jan-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US23331A1097 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935537906 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Donald R. Horton | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Rating of Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Rating. We believe that cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the leadership of the Chairman of the Board. |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Barbara K. Allen | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Brad S. Anderson | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Michael R. Buchanan | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Benjamin S. Carson, Sr. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Michael W. Hewatt | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Maribess L. Miller | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 2. | Approval of the advisory resolution on executive compensation. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Rating we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,175 | | | | 0 | | | 10-Jan-2022 | 10-Jan-2022 | |
| EMERSON ELECTRIC CO. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 291011104 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | EMR | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 01-Feb-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US2910111044 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935533299 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1. | DIRECTOR | | | | | | | Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | 1 | | J. B. Bolten | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| | | | 2 | | W. H. Easter III | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| | | | 3 | | S. L. Karsanbhai | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 4 | | L. M. Lee | | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Ratification of KPMG LLP as Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Rating we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Approval, by non-binding advisory vote, of Emerson Electric Co. executive compensation. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 3,257 | | | | 0 | | | 19-Jan-2022 | 19-Jan-2022 | |
| DEERE & COMPANY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 244199105 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | DE | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 23-Feb-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US2441991054 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935540977 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Leanne G. Caret | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Tamra A. Erwin | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Alan C. Heuberger | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Charles O. Holliday, Jr. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Michael O. Johanns | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Clayton M. Jones | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1G. | Election of Director: John C. May | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Gregory R. Page | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Sherry M. Smith | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Dmitri L. Stockton | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Sheila G. Talton | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Advisory vote on executive compensation. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Deere's independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Rating we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Approval of the Nonemployee Director Stock Ownership Plan. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5. | Shareholder Proposal - Special Shareholder Meeting Improvement. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of 25% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 251 | | | | | 0 | | | 07-Feb-2022 | 07-Feb-2022 | |
| APPLE INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 037833100 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | AAPL | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 04-Mar-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US0378331005 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935541549 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: James Bell | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Tim Cook | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Al Gore | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F19 Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Alex Gorsky | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Andrea Jung | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F19 Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Art Levinson | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F19 Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Monica Lozano | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Ron Sugar | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Sue Wagner | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Apple's independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Advisory vote to approve executive compensation. | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Approval of the Apple Inc. 2022 Employee Stock Plan. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account the maximum amount of shareholder equity dilution this proposal could cause, as well as both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the passage of this plan as proposed by the board of directors. We recommend the board seek to align CEO pay more closely with the performance of the company and work to reduce the cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 5. | A shareholder proposal entitled "Reincorporate with Deeper Purpose". | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 6. | A shareholder proposal entitled "Transparency Reports". | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that approval of the proposal will reduce the posed significant legal, reputational, and financial risk to Apple and its shareholders brought by lack of transparency that affects freedom of expression or access to information. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 7. | A shareholder proposal entitled "Report on Forced Labor". | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that transparency is important for evaluating risks and ensuring that investors and stakeholders have adequate information necessary to make informed decisions. Accordingly, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 8. | A shareholder proposal entitled "Pay Equity". | | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that approval of the proposal is necessary and warranted in the Company. Pay disparities by gender and race in companies, in our view, could bring operational risks and reputational damage that is detrimental to shareholder value. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 9. | A shareholder proposal entitled "Civil Rights Audit". | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that a company's success depends upon its ability to embrace diversity in the community it serves. As such, we believe that adoption of this proposal is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. As such, in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 10. | A shareholder proposal entitled "Report on Concealment Clauses". | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that transparency is important for evaluating risks and ensuring that investors and stakeholders have adequate information necessary to make informed decisions. Accordingly, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 2,342 | | | | 0 | | | 28-Feb-2022 | 28-Feb-2022 | |
| 19-9867MS | | | | | SC ZIEGLER FAMCO FUND AND MS | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 14,080 | | | | 0 | | | 28-Feb-2022 | 28-Feb-2022 | |
| ANALOG DEVICES, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 032654105 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | ADI | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 09-Mar-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US0326541051 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935542248 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Ray Stata | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Vincent Roche | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: James A. Champy | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Anantha P. Chandrakasan | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Tunç Doluca | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Bruce R. Evans | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Edward H. Frank | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Laurie H. Glimcher | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Karen M. Golz | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Mercedes Johnson | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Kenton J. Sicchitano | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1L. | Election of Director: Susie Wee | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 2. | Advisory resolution to approve the compensation of our named executive officers. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Approve the Analog Devices, Inc. 2022 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 663 | | | | | 0 | | | 18-Feb-2022 | 18-Feb-2022 | |
| QUALCOMM INCORPORATED | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 747525103 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | QCOM | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 09-Mar-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US7475251036 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935543567 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Sylvia Acevedo | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Cristiano R. Amon | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Mark Fields | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Jeffrey W. Henderson | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Gregory N. Johnson | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Ann M. Livermore | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Mark D. McLaughlin | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Jamie S. Miller | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Irene B. Rosenfeld | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Kornelis (Neil) Smit | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Jean-Pascal Tricoire | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1L. | Election of Director: Anthony J. Vinciquerra | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent public accountants for our fiscal year ending September 25, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Advisory vote to approve the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,010 | | | | 0 | | | 18-Feb-2022 | 18-Feb-2022 | |
| THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 254687106 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | DIS | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 09-Mar-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US2546871060 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935544317 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Susan E. Arnold | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Mary T. Barra | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Safra A. Catz | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Amy L. Chang | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Robert A. Chapek | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Francis A. deSouza | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Michael B.G. Froman | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Maria Elena Lagomasino | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Calvin R. McDonald | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Mark G. Parker | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Derica W. Rice | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company's independent registered public accountants for fiscal 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Consideration of an advisory vote to approve executive compensation. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Shareholder proposal, if properly presented at the meeting, requesting an annual report disclosing information regarding lobbying policies and activities. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5. | Shareholder proposal, if properly presented at the meeting, requesting amendment of the Company's governing documents to lower the stock ownership threshold to call a special meeting of shareholders. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 6. | Shareholder proposal, if properly presented at the meeting, requesting a diligence report evaluating human rights impacts. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. | |
| 7. | Shareholder proposal, if properly presented at the meeting, requesting a report on both median and adjusted pay gaps across race and gender. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that approval of the proposal is necessary and warranted in the Company. Pay disparities by gender in companies, in our view, could bring operational risks and reputational damage that is detrimental to shareholder value. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 8. | Shareholder proposal, if properly presented at the meeting, requesting a workplace non- discrimination audit and report. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that a company's success depends upon its ability to embrace diversity and to draw upon the skills, expertise and experience of its workforce. As such, we believe that the adoption of this proposal is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. As such, in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 391 | | | | | 0 | | | 24-Feb-2022 | 24-Feb-2022 | |
| 19-9867MS | | | | | SC ZIEGLER FAMCO FUND AND MS | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,630 | | | | 0 | | | 24-Feb-2022 | 24-Feb-2022 | |
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 038222105 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | AMAT | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 10-Mar-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US0382221051 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935544381 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Rani Borkar | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Judy Bruner | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Xun (Eric) Chen | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Aart J. de Geus | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Gary E. Dickerson | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Thomas J. Iannotti | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Alexander A. Karsner | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Adrianna C. Ma | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Yvonne McGill | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Scott A. McGregor | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of Applied Materials' named executive officers for fiscal year 2021. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as Applied Materials' independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Shareholder proposal to amend the appropriate company governing documents to give the owners of a combined 10% of our outstanding common stock the power to call a special shareholder meeting. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 5. | Shareholder proposal to improve the executive compensation program and policy, such as to include the CEO pay ratio factor and voices from employees. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 745 | | | | | 0 | | | 01-Mar-2022 | 01-Mar-2022 | |
| STARBUCKS CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 855244109 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | SBUX | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 16-Mar-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US8552441094 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935545799 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Richard E. Allison, Jr. | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F19 Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Andrew Campion | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F19 Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Mary N. Dillon | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F19 Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Isabel Ge Mahe | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Mellody Hobson | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Kevin R. Johnson | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Jørgen Vig Knudstorp | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Satya Nadella | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Joshua Cooper Ramo | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Clara Shih | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F19 Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Javier G. Teruel | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F19 Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 2. | Approve amended and restated 2005 Long- Term Equity Incentive Plan. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account the maximum amount of shareholder equity dilution this proposal could cause, as well as both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the passage of this plan as proposed by the board of directors. We recommend the board seek to align CEO pay more closely with the performance of the company and work to reduce the cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Approve, on an advisory, nonbinding basis,the compensation of our named executive officers. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 5. | Annual Reports Regarding the Prevention of Harassment and Discrimination in the Workplace. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that approval of the proposal will reduce the posed significant legal, reputational, and financial risk to Apple and its shareholders brought by lack of transparency that affects freedom of expression or access to information. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,904 | | | | 0 | | | 07-Mar-2022 | 07-Mar-2022 | |
| BROADCOM INC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 11135F101 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | AVGO | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 04-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US11135F1012 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935550740 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Diane M. Bryant | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Gayla J. Delly | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Raul J. Fernandez | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Eddy W. Hartenstein | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Check Kian Low | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Justine F. Page | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Henry Samueli | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Hock E. Tan | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Harry L. You | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 2. | Ratification of the appointment of Pricewaterhouse- Coopers LLP as Broadcom's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending October 30, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Advisory vote to approve compensation of Broadcom's named executive officers. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 584 | | | | | 0 | | | 08-Mar-2022 | 08-Mar-2022 | |
| SYNOPSYS, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 871607107 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | SNPS | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 12-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US8716071076 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935552845 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Aart J. de Geus | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F21 Combined CEO and Board Chair Positions and the Company Earns a Board Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having the CEO or former CEO serve as the Chairman of the Board. Consequently, we prefer that companies focus on the following areas to improve its corporate governance practices: separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO, hold annual director elections, have one class of voting stock only, have key board committees consisting of independent directors and majority of independent directors on board and include non-binding compensation vote on agenda to further ensure board independence and accountability. |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Janice D. Chaffin | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Bruce R. Chizen | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Mercedes Johnson | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Chrysostomos L. "Max" Nikias | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Jeannine P. Sargent | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: John G. Schwarz | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Roy Vallee | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 2. | To approve our 2006 Employee Equity Incentive Plan, as amended, in order to, among other items, increase the number of shares available for issuance under the plan by 3,000,000 shares. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | To approve our Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended, in order to, among other items, increase the number of shares available for issuance under the plan by 2,000,000 shares. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in the Proxy Statement. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5. | To ratify the selection of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending October 29, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 6. | To vote on a stockholder proposal that permits stockholder action by written consent, if properly presented at the meeting. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We have determined that it is a positive corporate governance measure to allow the stockholders to have the ability to take action by written consent, if such written consent or consents sets forth the action to be taken and is signed by the holders of outstanding stock having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting at which all shares entitled to vote on the matter were present and voted. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 322 | | | | | 0 | | | 29-Mar-2022 | 29-Mar-2022 | |
| IQVIA HOLDINGS INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 46266C105 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | IQV | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 12-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US46266C1053 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935553710 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1. | DIRECTOR | | | | | | | Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | 1 | | John P. Connaughton | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| | | | 2 | | John G. Danhakl | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| | | | 3 | | James A. Fasano | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 4 | | Leslie Wims Morris | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation to declassify the Board of Directors over time and provide for the annual election of all directors. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Advisory (non-binding) vote to approve executive compensation (say-on-pay). | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | If properly presented, a shareholder proposal regarding majority voting in uncontested director elections. | Management | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Generally, we support proposals calling for majority vote requirements. We believe that majority vote requirements in boardroom elections enhance director accountability to shareholders and director accountability is the hallmark of good governance. The board election process should ensure that shareholder expressions of dissatisfaction with the performance of directors have real consequences. A majority-vote standard will transform the director election process from a symbolic gesture to a process that gives meaningful voice to shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 5. | The ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as IQVIA Holdings Inc.'s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 382 | | | | | 0 | | | 29-Mar-2022 | 29-Mar-2022 | |
| DUKE REALTY CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 264411505 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | DRE | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 14-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US2644115055 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935553621 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1a. | Election of Director to serve for a one-year term ending at the 2023 Annual Meeting: John P. Case | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1b. | Election of Director to serve for a one-year term ending at the 2023 Annual Meeting: James B. Connor | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F22 Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the leadership of the Chairman of the Board. |
| 1c. | Election of Director to serve for a one-year term ending at the 2023 Annual Meeting: Tamara D. Fischer | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1d. | Election of Director to serve for a one-year term ending at the 2023 Annual Meeting: Norman K. Jenkins | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1e. | Election of Director to serve for a one-year term ending at the 2023 Annual Meeting: Kelly T. Killingsworth | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1f. | Election of Director to serve for a one-year term ending at the 2023 Annual Meeting: Melanie R. Sabelhaus | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1g. | Election of Director to serve for a one-year term ending at the 2023 Annual Meeting: Peter M. Scott, III | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1h. | Election of Director to serve for a one-year term ending at the 2023 Annual Meeting: David P. Stockert | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1i. | Election of Director to serve for a one-year term ending at the 2023 Annual Meeting: Chris T. Sultemeier | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1j. | Election of Director to serve for a one-year term ending at the 2023 Annual Meeting: Warren M. Thompson | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1k. | Election of Director to serve for a one-year term ending at the 2023 Annual Meeting: Lynn C. Thurber | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | To vote on an advisory basis to approve the compensation of the Company's named executive officers as set forth in the proxy statement. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | To ratify the reappointment of KPMG LLP as the Company's independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 2,176 | | | | 0 | | | 15-Mar-2022 | 15-Mar-2022 | |
| ADOBE INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 00724F101 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | ADBE | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 14-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US00724F1012 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935553669 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director to serve for a one-year term: Amy Banse | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1B. | Election of Director to serve for a one-year term: Brett Biggs | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director to serve for a one-year term: Melanie Boulden | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1D. | Election of Director to serve for a one-year term: Frank Calderoni | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1E. | Election of Director to serve for a one-year term: Laura Desmond | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1F. | Election of Director to serve for a one-year term: Shantanu Narayen | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director to serve for a one-year term: Spencer Neumann | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director to serve for a one-year term: Kathleen Oberg | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director to serve for a one-year term: Dheeraj Pandey | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director to serve for a one-year term: David Ricks | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1K. | Election of Director to serve for a one-year term: Daniel Rosensweig | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1L. | Election of Director to serve for a one-year term: John Warnock | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending on December 2, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 658 | | | | | 0 | | | 16-Mar-2022 | 16-Mar-2022 | |
| CARRIER GLOBAL CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 14448C104 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | CARR | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 14-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US14448C1045 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935554027 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Jean-Pierre Garnier | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: David Gitlin | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: John J. Greisch | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Charles M. Holley, Jr. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Michael M. McNamara | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Michael A. Todman | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Virginia M. Wilson | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Beth A. Wozniak | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Ratify Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to Serve as Independent Auditor for 2022. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 3,281 | | | | 0 | | | 17-Mar-2022 | 17-Mar-2022 | |
| DOW INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 260557103 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | DOW | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 14-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US2605571031 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935554736 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Samuel R. Allen | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Gaurdie Banister Jr. | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Wesley G. Bush | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Richard K. Davis | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Jerri DeVard | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Debra L. Dial | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Jeff M. Fettig | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Jim Fitterling | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Jacqueline C. Hinman | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Luis Alberto Moreno | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Jill S. Wyant | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1L. | Election of Director: Daniel W. Yohannes | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Advisory Resolution to Approve Executive Compensation. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Ratification of the Appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company's Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Stockholder Proposal - Independent Board Chairman. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having an Inside director serve as the Chairman of the board. Consequently, we prefer that companies separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO and that the Chairman be independent to further ensure board independence and accountability. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 3,171 | | | | 0 | | | 30-Mar-2022 | 30-Mar-2022 | |
| U.S. BANCORP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 902973304 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | USB | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 19-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US9029733048 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935556083 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Warner L. Baxter | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Dorothy J. Bridges | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Elizabeth L. Buse | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Andrew Cecere | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Kimberly N. Ellison- Taylor | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Kimberly J. Harris | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Roland A. Hernandez | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Olivia F. Kirtley | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Richard P. McKenney | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Yusuf I. Mehdi | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: John P. Wiehoff | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1L. | Election of Director: Scott W. Wine | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | The ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditor for the 2022 fiscal year. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | An advisory vote to approve the compensation of our executives disclosed in the proxy statement. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,121 | | | | 0 | | | 23-Mar-2022 | 23-Mar-2022 | |
| EOG RESOURCES, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 26875P101 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | EOG | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 20-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US26875P1012 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935557011 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director to serve until 2023: Janet F. Clark | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director to serve until 2023: Charles R. Crisp | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1C. | Election of Director to serve until 2023: Robert P. Daniels | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director to serve until 2023: James C. Day | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1E. | Election of Director to serve until 2023: C. Christopher Gaut | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director to serve until 2023: Michael T. Kerr | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director to serve until 2023: Julie J. Robertson | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director to serve until 2023: Donald F. Textor | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1I. | Election of Director to serve until 2023: William R. Thomas | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director to serve until 2023: Ezra Y. Yacob | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | To ratify the appointment by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, as auditors for the Company for the year ending December 31, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | To approve, by non-binding vote, the compensation of the Company's named executive officers. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,713 | | | | 0 | | | 22-Mar-2022 | 22-Mar-2022 | |
| REGIONS FINANCIAL CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 7591EP100 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | RF | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 20-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US7591EP1005 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935557871 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Samuel A. Di Piazza, Jr. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Zhanna Golodryga | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: John D. Johns | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Joia M. Johnson | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Ruth Ann Marshall | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Charles D. McCrary | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: James T. Prokopanko | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Lee J. Styslinger III | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1I. | Election of Director: José S. Suquet | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: John M. Turner, Jr. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Timothy Vines | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Ratification of Appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 9,197 | | | | 0 | | | 16-Mar-2022 | 16-Mar-2022 | |
| SVB FINANCIAL GROUP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 78486Q101 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | SIVB | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 21-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US78486Q1013 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935556944 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1. | DIRECTOR | | | | | | | Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | 1 | | Greg Becker | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 2 | | Eric Benhamou | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| | | | 3 | | Elizabeth "Busy" Burr | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 4 | | Richard Daniels | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 5 | | Alison Davis | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 6 | | Joel Friedman | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| | | | 7 | | Jeffrey Maggioncalda | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| | | | 8 | | Beverly Kay Matthews | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F3 Over-Boarded (Board Chair) According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Chairman, being responsible for the leadership of the Board and the creation of the conditions necessary for overall board and individual director effectiveness, should hold no more than one other public directorship to ensure the valuable and prudent exercise of his/her fiduciary duties as a Chairman and that his/her integrity and efficiency are not compromised. |
| | | | 9 | | Mary Miller | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 10 | | Kate Mitchell | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 11 | | Garen Staglin | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 2. | To approve, on an advisory basis, our executive compensation ("Say on Pay"). | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for its fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Shareholder proposal requesting that the Board of Directors oversee a racial equity audit. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that a company's success depends upon its ability to embrace diversity. As such, we believe that adoption of this proposal is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. As such, in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 133 | | | | | 0 | | | 30-Mar-2022 | 30-Mar-2022 | |
| HUMANA INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 444859102 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | HUM | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 21-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US4448591028 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935557857 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A) | Election of Director: Raquel C. Bono, M.D. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B) | Election of Director: Bruce D. Broussard | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C) | Election of Director: Frank A. D'Amelio | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1D) | Election of Director: David T. Feinberg, M.D. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E) | Election of Director: Wayne A. I. Frederick, M.D. | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1F) | Election of Director: John W. Garratt | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G) | Election of Director: Kurt J. Hilzinger | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F22 Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the leadership of the Chairman of the Board. |
| 1H) | Election of Director: David A. Jones, Jr. | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| | | F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1I) | Election of Director: Karen W. Katz | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J) | Election of Director: Marcy S. Klevorn | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K) | Election of Director: William J. McDonald | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1L) | Election of Director: Jorge S. Mesquita | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1M) | Election of Director: James J. O'Brien | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 2) | The ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3) | Non-binding advisory vote for the approval of the compensation of the named executive officers as disclosed in the 2022 proxy statement. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 103 | | | | | 0 | | | 23-Mar-2022 | 23-Mar-2022 | |
| NEWMONT CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 651639106 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | NEM | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 21-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US6516391066 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935558051 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Patrick Awuah. (Please note that an Against vote is treated as a Withhold) | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Gregory Boyce. (Please note that an Against vote is treated as a Withhold) | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Bruce Brook. (Please note that an Against vote is treated as a Withhold) | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Maura Clark. (Please note that an Against vote is treated as a Withhold) | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Emma FitzGerald. (Please note that an Against vote is treated as a Withhold) | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Mary Laschinger. (Please note that an Against vote is treated as a Withhold) | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1G. | Election of Director: José Manuel Madero. (Please note that an Against vote is treated as a Withhold) | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: René Médori. (Please note that an Against vote is treated as a Withhold) | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Jane Nelson. (Please note that an Against vote is treated as a Withhold) | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Thomas Palmer. (Please note that an Against vote is treated as a Withhold) | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Julio Quintana. (Please note that an Against vote is treated as a Withhold) | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1L. | Election of Director: Susan Story. (Please note that an Against vote is treated as a Withhold) | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Approve, on an Advisory Basis, Named Executive Officer Compensation. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Ratify Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 724 | | | | | 0 | | | 23-Mar-2022 | 23-Mar-2022 | |
| HCA HEALTHCARE, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 40412C101 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | HCA | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 21-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US40412C1018 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935561236 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Thomas F. Frist III | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F22 Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the leadership of the Chairman of the Board. |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Samuel N. Hazen | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Meg G. Crofton | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Robert J. Dennis | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Nancy-Ann DeParle | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: William R. Frist | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Charles O. Holliday, Jr. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Hugh F. Johnston | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Michael W. Michelson | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Wayne J. Riley, M.D. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Andrea B. Smith | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | Stockholder proposal, if properly presented at the meeting, regarding political spending disclosure. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: In light of the Company's policies and oversight mechanisms related to its political contributions and activities, we believe that the shareholder proposal is unnecessary and will not result in any additional benefit to the shareholders. Rather, the proposal promotes impractical and imprudent actions that would negatively affect the business and results. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 5. | Stockholder proposal, if properly presented at the meeting, regarding lobbying disclosure. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that it is in the best interests of the Company and the stockholders to belong to industry associations and coalitions, where the Company benefits from the general business, technical, and industry standard-setting expertise these organizations provide. We furthermore believe that the proposal seeks unnecessary line-item disclosure of lobbying expenditures. We believe that the requested report is unnecessary and would require expenditures and the use of Company resources without providing any meaningful benefit to the shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 578 | | | | | 0 | | | 30-Mar-2022 | 30-Mar-2022 | |
| L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 502431109 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | LHX | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 22-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US5024311095 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935559661 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director for a Term Expiring at 2023: Sallie B. Bailey | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director for a Term Expiring at 2023: William M. Brown | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director for a Term Expiring at 2023: Peter W. Chiarelli | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director for a Term Expiring at 2023: Thomas A. Corcoran | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director for a Term Expiring at 2023: Thomas A. Dattilo | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1F. | Election of Director for a Term Expiring at 2023: Roger B. Fradin | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director for a Term Expiring at 2023: Harry B. Harris Jr. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director for a Term Expiring at 2023: Lewis Hay III | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention |
| | | Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1I. | Election of Director for a Term Expiring at 2023: Lewis Kramer | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1J. | Election of Director for a Term Expiring at 2023: Christopher E. Kubasik | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director for a Term Expiring at 2023: Rita S. Lane | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1L. | Election of Director for a Term Expiring at 2023: Robert B. Millard | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1M. | Election of Director for a Term Expiring at 2023: Lloyd W. Newton | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | To amend Our Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the maximum number of Board seats | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Approval, in an Advisory Vote, of the Compensation of Named Executive Officers as Disclosed in the Proxy Statement | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Ratification of Appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for Fiscal Year 2022 | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 658 | | | | | 0 | | | 05-Apr-2022 | 05-Apr-2022 | |
| FASTENAL COMPANY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 311900104 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | FAST | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 23-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US3119001044 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935558619 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Scott A. Satterlee | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Michael J. Ancius | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Stephen L. Eastman | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Daniel L. Florness | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Rita J. Heise | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Hsenghung Sam Hsu | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Daniel L. Johnson | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Nicholas J. Lundquist | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Sarah N. Nielsen | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Reyne K. Wisecup | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as independent registered public accounting firm for the 2022 fiscal year. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Approval, by non-binding vote, of executive compensation. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 6,735 | | | | 0 | | | 28-Mar-2022 | 28-Mar-2022 | |
| HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 438516106 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | HON | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 25-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US4385161066 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935559510 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Darius Adamczyk | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F21 Combined CEO and Board Chair Positions and the Company Earns a Board Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having the CEO or former CEO serve as the Chairman of the Board. Consequently, we prefer that companies focus on the following areas to improve its corporate governance practices: separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO, hold annual director elections, have one class of voting stock only, have key board committees consisting of independent directors and majority of independent directors on board and include non-binding compensation vote on agenda to further ensure board independence and accountability. |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Duncan B. Angove | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1C. | Election of Director: William S. Ayer | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Kevin Burke | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1E. | Election of Director: D. Scott Davis | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Deborah Flint | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Rose Lee | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Grace D. Lieblein | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1I. | Election of Director: George Paz | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Robin L. Washington | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Approval of Appointment of Independent Accountants. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Shareowner Proposal - Special Shareholder Meeting Improvement. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 5. | Shareowner Proposal - Climate Lobbying Report. | | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the approval of this proposal would result in the Company incurring unnecessary costs and expenses by duplicating efforts that are already underway and providing additional reports with information that is already available to shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 6. | Shareowner Proposal - Environmental and Social Due Diligence. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval. Here, we find that approval of the proposal will provide the transparency shareholders need to evaluate such activities. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 966 | | | | | 0 | | | 11-Apr-2022 | 11-Apr-2022 | |
| RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 75513E101 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | RTX | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 25-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US75513E1010 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935559673 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Tracy A. Atkinson | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Bernard A.Harris,Jr. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Gregory J. Hayes | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: George R. Oliver | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Robert K. (Kelly) Ortberg | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Margaret L. O'Sullivan | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Dinesh C. Paliwal | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Ellen M. Pawlikowski | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Denise L. Ramos | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Fredric G. Reynolds | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Brian C. Rogers | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1L. | Election of Director: James A. Winnefeld, Jr. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1M. | Election of Director: Robert O. Work | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Appoint PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to Serve as Independent Auditor for 2022 | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Approve an Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation to Reduce the Voting Threshold Required to Repeal Article Ninth | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 3,055 | | | | 0 | | | 31-Mar-2022 | 31-Mar-2022 | |
| CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 16119P108 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | CHTR | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 26-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US16119P1084 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935556300 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: W. Lance Conn | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Kim C. Goodman | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Craig A. Jacobson | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Gregory B. Maffei | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1E. | Election of Director: John D. Markley, Jr. | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1F. | Election of Director: David C. Merritt | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1G. | Election of Director: James E. Meyer | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Steven A. Miron | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Balan Nair | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Michael A. Newhouse | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Mauricio Ramos | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1L. | Election of Director: Thomas M. Rutledge | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F21 Combined CEO and Board Chair Positions and the Company Earns a Board Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having the CEO or former CEO serve as the Chairman of the Board. Consequently, we prefer that companies focus on the following areas to improve its corporate governance practices: separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO, hold annual director elections, have one class of voting stock only, have key board committees consisting of independent directors and majority of independent directors on board and include non-binding compensation vote on agenda to further ensure board independence and accountability. F22 Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Rating of Needs Attention |
| | | Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Rating. We believe that cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the leadership of the Chairman of the Board. |
| 1M. | Election of Director: Eric L. Zinterhofer | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 2. | The ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended December 31, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Stockholder proposal regarding lobbying activities. | | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that it is in the best interests of the Company and the stockholders to belong to industry associations and coalitions, where the Company benefits from the general business, technical, and industry standard-setting expertise these organizations provide. We furthermore believe that the proposal seeks unnecessary line-item disclosure of lobbying expenditures. We believe that the requested report is unnecessary and would require expenditures and the use of Company resources without providing any meaningful benefit to the shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Stockholder proposal regarding Chairman of the Board and CEO roles. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having an Inside director serve as the Chairman of the board. Consequently, we prefer that companies separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO and that the Chairman be independent to further ensure board independence and accountability. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 5. | Stockholder proposal regarding political and electioneering expenditure congruency report. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: In light of the Company's policies and oversight mechanisms related to its political contributions and activities, we believe that the shareholder proposal is unnecessary and will not result in any additional benefit to the shareholders. Rather, the proposal promotes impractical and imprudent actions that would negatively affect the business and results. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 6. | Stockholder proposal regarding disclosure of greenhouse gas emissions. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that setting clear-cut goals will help the Company reduce its regulatory risk related to GHG emissions, financial risk by decreasing volatility of energy prices, and overall expenditure on energy by implementing a disciplined business strategy to cut emissions from its operations. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 7. | Stockholder proposal regarding EEO-1 reports. | | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval. Here, we find that approval of the proposal will provide the transparency shareholders need to evaluate such activities. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 8. | Stockholder proposal regarding diversity, equity and inclusion reports. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval. Here, we find that approval of the proposal will provide the transparency shareholders need to evaluate such activities. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 157 | | | | | 0 | | | 13-Apr-2022 | 13-Apr-2022 | |
| WELLS FARGO & COMPANY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 949746101 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | WFC | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 26-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US9497461015 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935558594 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Steven D. Black | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Mark A. Chancy | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Celeste A. Clark | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Theodore F. Craver, Jr. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Richard K. Davis | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Wayne M. Hewett | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: CeCelia ("CeCe") G. Morken | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Maria R. Morris | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Felicia F. Norwood | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Richard B. Payne, Jr. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Juan A. Pujadas | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1L. | Election of Director: Ronald L. Sargent | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1M. | Election of Director: Charles W. Scharf | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1N. | Election of Director: Suzanne M. Vautrinot | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Advisory resolution to approve executive compensation (Say on Pay). | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Approve the Company's 2022 Long-Term Incentive Plan. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | Ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 5. | Shareholder Proposal - Policy for Management Pay Clawback Authorization. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The determination as to whether clawback policies are satisfactory should be made by the Company in a manner consistent with its disclosure policies and procedures. While the SEC has yet to announce specific rules implementing the clawback provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act, we believe that the current mandates of the Company's clawback policies are sufficient and appropriate. Until a broader disclosure requirement applicable to all public companies is approved by the SEC, it is suitable for the Company to defer the decision on revising its existing clawback policies. Given the preceding details, we believe that the Company's existing policy strikes an appropriate balance and establishes appropriate standards for recoupment of incentive compensation while providing sufficient detail to appropriately inform and motivate employees. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 6. | Shareholder Proposal - Report on Incentive-Based Compensation and Risks of Material Losses. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the proposal is necessary and is in the best long-term interest of the Company and its shareholders. As such, in accordance with Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 7. | Shareholder Proposal - Racial and Gender Board Diversity Report. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval. We believe that the proposal would encourage good governance and enhance shareholder value by bringing together a diverse range of skills and experience necessary in building a constructive and challenging board. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 8. | Shareholder Proposal - Report on Respecting Indigenous Peoples' Rights. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that transparency is important for evaluating risks and ensuring that investors and stakeholders have adequate information necessary to make informed decisions. Accordingly, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 9. | Shareholder Proposal - Climate Change Policy. | | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the policy change requested by the proposal is unnecessary and would restrict the company's ability to implement its own climate strategy. As such, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 10. | Shareholder Proposal - Conduct a Racial Equity Audit. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that approval of the proposal will allow the Company to protect the Company's brand value and reputation on diversity issues. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 11. | Shareholder Proposal - Charitable Donations Disclosure. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the proposal is not necessary and is not in the best long-term interest of the Company and its shareholders. As such, in accordance with Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 4,113 | | | | 0 | | | 13-Apr-2022 | 13-Apr-2022 | |
| CENTENE CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 15135B101 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | CNC | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 26-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US15135B1017 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935559863 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Orlando Ayala | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Kenneth A. Burdick | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: H. James Dallas | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Sarah M. London | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Theodore R. Samuels | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | ADVISORY RESOLUTION TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF KPMG LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Some Concerns and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY'S AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO DECLASSIFY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5. | BOARD PROPOSAL REGARDING STOCKHOLDER RIGHT TO CALL FOR A SPECIAL STOCKHOLDER MEETING. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We do not believe it is appropriate to enable only holders of at least 25% or more of the common stock to have an ability to call a special meeting. We believe that it is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 6. | STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL TO ALLOW FOR THE SHAREHOLDER RIGHT TO CALL FOR A SPECIAL SHAREHOLDER MEETING. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 598 | | | | | 0 | | | 04-Apr-2022 | 04-Apr-2022 | |
| BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 060505104 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | BAC | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 26-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US0605051046 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935560335 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Sharon L. Allen | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Frank P. Bramble, Sr. | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Pierre J.P. de Weck | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Arnold W. Donald | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Linda P. Hudson | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Monica C. Lozano | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Brian T. Moynihan | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Lionel L. Nowell III | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Denise L. Ramos | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Clayton S. Rose | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Michael D. White | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1L. | Election of Director: Thomas D. Woods | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1M. | Election of Director: R. David Yost | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1N. | Election of Director: Maria T. Zuber | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Approving our executive compensation (an advisory, nonbinding "Say on Pay" resolution) | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Ratifying the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Ratifying the Delaware Exclusive Forum Provision in our Bylaws. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5. | Shareholder proposal requesting a civil rights and nondiscrimination audit. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that approval of the proposal will allow the Company to protect the Company's brand value and reputation on diversity issues. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 6. | Shareholder proposal requesting adoption of policy to cease financing new fossil fuel supplies. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the policy change requested by the proposal is unnecessary and would restrict the company's ability to implement its own climate strategy. As such, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 7. | Shareholder proposal requesting a report on charitable donations. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the proposal is not necessary and is not in the best long-term interest of the Company and its shareholders. As such, in accordance with Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 58 | | | | | 0 | | | 11-Apr-2022 | 11-Apr-2022 | |
| 19-9867MS | | | | | SC ZIEGLER FAMCO FUND AND MS | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 9,500 | | | | 0 | | | 11-Apr-2022 | 11-Apr-2022 | |
| TRUIST FINANCIAL CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 89832Q109 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | TFC | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 26-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US89832Q1094 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935561995 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director for one year term expiring at 2023: Jennifer S. Banner | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director for one year term expiring at 2023: K. David Boyer, Jr. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director for one year term expiring at 2023: Agnes Bundy Scanlan | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director for one year term expiring at 2023: Anna R. Cablik | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director for one year term expiring at 2023: Dallas S. Clement | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director for one year term expiring at 2023: Paul D. Donahue | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director for one year term expiring at 2023: Patrick C. Graney III | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director for one year term expiring at 2023: Linnie M. Haynesworth | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director for one year term expiring at 2023: Kelly S. King | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director for one year term expiring at 2023: Easter A. Maynard | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director for one year term expiring at 2023: Donna S. Morea | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1L. | Election of Director for one year term expiring at 2023: Charles A. Patton | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1M. | Election of Director for one year term expiring at 2023: Nido R. Qubein | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1N. | Election of Director for one year term expiring at 2023: David M. Ratcliffe | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1O. | Election of Director for one year term expiring at 2023: William H. Rogers, Jr. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1P. | Election of Director for one year term expiring at 2023: Frank P. Scruggs, Jr. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1Q. | Election of Director for one year term expiring at 2023: Christine Sears | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1R. | Election of Director for one year term expiring at 2023: Thomas E. Skains | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1S. | Election of Director for one year term expiring at 2023: Bruce L. Tanner | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1T. | Election of Director for one year term expiring at 2023: Thomas N. Thompson | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1U. | Election of Director for one year term expiring at 2023: Steven C. Voorhees | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Truist's independent registered public accounting firm for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Advisory vote to approve Truist's executive compensation program. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | To approve the Truist Financial Corporation 2022 Incentive Plan. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5. | To approve the Truist Financial Corporation 2022 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 6. | Shareholder proposal regarding an independent Chairman of the Board of Directors, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having an Inside director serve as the Chairman of the board. Consequently, we prefer that companies separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO and that the Chairman be independent to further ensure board independence and accountability. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,334 | | | | 0 | | | 04-Apr-2022 | 04-Apr-2022 | |
| THE COCA-COLA COMPANY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 191216100 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | KO | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 26-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US1912161007 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935562086 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Herb Allen | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Marc Bolland | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Ana Botín | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Christopher C. Davis | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Barry Diller | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Helene D. Gayle | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Alexis M. Herman | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Maria Elena Lagomasino | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: James Quincey | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Caroline J. Tsay | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: David B. Weinberg | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Advisory vote to approve executive compensation | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Independent Auditors of the Company to serve for the 2022 fiscal year | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Shareowner proposal regarding an external public health impact disclosure | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the approval of this proposal would result in the Company incurring unnecessary costs and expenses by duplicating efforts that are already underway and providing additional reports with information that is already available to shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 5. | Shareowner proposal regarding a global transparency report | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the proposal is not necessary and is not in the best long-term interest of the Company and its shareholders. As such, in accordance with Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 6. | Shareowner proposal regarding an independent Board Chair policy | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having an Inside director serve as the Chairman of the board. Consequently, we prefer that companies separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO and that the Chairman be independent to further ensure board independence and accountability. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 3,186 | | | | 0 | | | 07-Apr-2022 | 07-Apr-2022 | |
| CITIGROUP INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 172967424 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | C | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 26-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US1729674242 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935563177 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1a. | Election of Director: Ellen M. Costello | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1b. | Election of Director: Grace E. Dailey | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1c. | Election of Director: Barbara J. Desoer | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1d. | Election of Director: John C. Dugan | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F19 Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1e. | Election of Director: Jane N. Fraser | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1f. | Election of Director: Duncan P. Hennes | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F19 Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1g. | Election of Director: Peter B. Henry | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1h. | Election of Director: S. Leslie Ireland | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1i. | Election of Director: Renée J. James | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F19 Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are |
| | | centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1j. | Election of Director: Gary M. Reiner | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F19 Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1k. | Election of Director: Diana L. Taylor | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F19 Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1l. | Election of Director: James S. Turley | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Proposal to ratify the selection of KPMG LLP as Citi's independent registered public accountants for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Advisory vote to approve our 2021 Executive Compensation. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Approval of additional shares for the Citigroup 2019 Stock Incentive Plan. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account the maximum amount of shareholder equity dilution this proposal could cause, as well as both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the passage of this plan as proposed by the board of directors. We recommend the board seek to align CEO pay more closely with the performance of the company and work to reduce the cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 5. | Stockholder proposal requesting a Management Pay Clawback policy. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The determination as to whether clawback policies are satisfactory should be made by the Company in a manner consistent with its disclosure policies and procedures. We believe that the Company's existing policy strikes an appropriate balance and establishes appropriate standards for recoupment of incentive compensation while providing sufficient detail to appropriately inform and motivate employees. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 6. | Stockholder proposal requesting an Independent Board Chairman. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having an Inside director serve as the Chairman of the board. Consequently, we prefer that companies separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO and that the Chairman be independent to further ensure board independence and accountability. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 7. | Stockholder Proposal requesting a report on the effectiveness of Citi's policies and practices in respecting Indigenous Peoples' rights in Citi's existing and proposed financing. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that transparency is important for evaluating risks and ensuring that investors and stakeholders have adequate information necessary to make informed decisions. Accordingly, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 8. | Stockholder Proposal requesting that the Board adopt a policy to end new fossil fuel financing. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: However, we believe that the shareholder proposal is unnecessary and will not result in any additional benefit to the shareholders. Rather, the proposal promotes impractical and imprudent actions that would negatively affect the business and results. We recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 9. | Stockholder proposal requesting a non- discrimination audit analyzing the Company's impacts on civil rights and non- discrimination for all Americans. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that a company's success depends upon its ability to embrace diversity. As such, we believe that adoption of this proposal is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. As such, in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 81 | | | | | 0 | | | 14-Apr-2022 | 14-Apr-2022 | |
| 19-9867MS | | | | | SC ZIEGLER FAMCO FUND AND MS | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 2,800 | | | | 0 | | | 14-Apr-2022 | 14-Apr-2022 | |
| DOMINO'S PIZZA, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 25754A201 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | DPZ | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 26-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US25754A2015 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935563242 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1. | DIRECTOR | | | | | | | Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | 1 | | David A. Brandon | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F3 Over-Boarded (Board Chair) According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Chairman, being responsible for the leadership of the Board and the creation of the conditions necessary for overall board and individual director effectiveness, should hold no more than one other public directorship to ensure the valuable and prudent exercise of his/her fiduciary duties as a Chairman and that his/her integrity and efficiency are not compromised. F22 Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the leadership of the Chairman of the Board. |
| | | | 2 | | C. Andrew Ballard | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 3 | | Andrew B. Balson | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| | | | 4 | | Corie S. Barry | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 5 | | Diana F. Cantor | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 6 | | Richard L. Federico | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 7 | | James A. Goldman | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| | | | 8 | | Patricia E. Lopez | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 9 | | Russell J. Weiner | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Company for the 2022 fiscal year. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Advisory vote to approve the compensation of the named executive officers of the Company. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 104 | | | | | 0 | | | 24-Mar-2022 | 24-Mar-2022 | |
| KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 494368103 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | KMB | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 27-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US4943681035 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935557249 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director for a term expire at 2023 Annual Meeting: Sylvia M. Burwell | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director for a term expire at 2023 Annual Meeting: John W. Culver | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director for a term expire at 2023 Annual Meeting: Robert W. Decherd | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1D. | Election of Director for a term expire at 2023 Annual Meeting: Michael D. Hsu | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director for a term expire at 2023 Annual Meeting: Mae C. Jemison, M.D. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1F. | Election of Director for a term expire at 2023 Annual Meeting: S. Todd Maclin | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director for a term expire at 2023 Annual Meeting: Deirdre A. Mahlan | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director for a term expire at 2023 Annual Meeting: Sherilyn S. McCoy | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1I. | Election of Director for a term expire at 2023 Annual Meeting: Christa S. Quarles | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1J. | Election of Director for a term expire at 2023 Annual Meeting: Jaime A. Ramirez | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director for a term expire at 2023 Annual Meeting: Dunia A. Shive | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1L. | Election of Director for a term expire at 2023 Annual Meeting: Mark T. Smucker | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1M. | Election of Director for a term expire at 2023 Annual Meeting: Michael D. White | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Ratification of Auditor | | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,524 | | | | 0 | | | 07-Apr-2022 | 07-Apr-2022 | |
| CIGNA CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 125523100 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | CI | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 27-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US1255231003 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935562911 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: David M. Cordani | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F21 Combined CEO and Board Chair Positions and the Company Earns a Board Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having the CEO or former CEO serve as the Chairman of the Board. Consequently, we prefer that companies focus on the following areas to improve its corporate governance practices: separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO, hold annual director elections, have one class of voting stock only, have key board committees consisting of independent directors and majority of independent directors on board and include non-binding compensation vote on agenda to further ensure board independence and accountability. |
| 1B. | Election of Director: William J. DeLaney | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Eric J. Foss | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Elder Granger, MD, MG, USA (Retired) | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Neesha Hathi | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: George Kurian | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Kathleen M. Mazzarella | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Mark B. McClellan, MD, PhD | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Kimberly A. Ross | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Eric C. Wiseman | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Donna F. Zarcone | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Advisory approval of Cigna's executive compensation. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Cigna's independent registered public accounting firm for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Shareholder proposal - Special shareholder meeting improvement. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of at least 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 5. | Shareholder proposal - Gender pay gap report. | | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that a company's success depends upon its ability to embrace diversity and to draw upon the skills, expertise and experience of its workforce. Pay disparities by gender in companies, in our view, could bring operational risks and reputational damage that is detrimental to shareholder value. As such, we believe that adoption of this proposal is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. In accordance with Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal |
| 6. | Shareholder proposal - Political contributions report. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: In light of the Company's policies and oversight mechanisms related to its political contributions and activities, we believe that the shareholder proposal is unnecessary and will not result in any additional benefit to the shareholders. Rather, the proposal promotes impractical and imprudent actions that would negatively affect the business and results. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 510 | | | | | 0 | | | 13-Apr-2022 | 13-Apr-2022 | |
| MARATHON PETROLEUM CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 56585A102 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | MPC | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 27-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US56585A1025 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935563230 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Class II Directors: Evan Bayh | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1B. | Election of Class II Directors: Charles E. Bunch | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Class II Directors: Edward G. Galante | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Class II Directors: Kim K.W. Rucker | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Ratification of the selection of PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP as the company's independent auditor for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Approval, on an advisory basis, of the company's named executive officer compensation. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | Approval of an amendment to the company's Restated Certificate of Incorporation to declassify the Board of Directors. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5. | Approval of an amendment to the company's Restated Certificate of Incorporation to eliminate the supermajority provisions. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 6. | Approval of an amendment to the company's Restated Certificate of Incorporation to amend the exclusive forum provision. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 7. | Shareholder proposal seeking alternative right to call a special meeting. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of at least 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 8. | Shareholder proposal seeking an amendment to the company's existing clawback provisions. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The determination as to whether clawback policies are satisfactory should be made by the Company in a manner consistent with its disclosure policies and procedures. We believe that the Company's existing policy strikes an appropriate balance and establishes appropriate standards for recoupment of incentive compensation while providing sufficient detail to appropriately inform and motivate employees. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 9. | Shareholder proposal seeking a report on just transition. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that improved transparency and accountability will enhance the Company's commitment to long-term sustainability. In accordance with Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 2,338 | | | | 0 | | | 18-Apr-2022 | 18-Apr-2022 | |
| NRG ENERGY, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 629377508 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | NRG | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 28-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US6293775085 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935560006 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: E. Spencer Abraham | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Antonio Carrillo | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Matthew Carter, Jr. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Lawrence S. Coben | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Heather Cox | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Elisabeth B. Donohue | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Mauricio Gutierrez | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Paul W. Hobby | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Alexandra Pruner | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Anne C. Schaumburg | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Thomas H. Weidemeyer | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 2. | To approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of the Company's named executive officers. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 4,072 | | | | 0 | | | 12-Apr-2022 | 12-Apr-2022 | |
| INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 46120E602 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | ISRG | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 28-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US46120E6023 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935560765 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Craig H. Barratt, Ph.D. | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F22 Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Rating of Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Rating. We believe that cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the leadership of the Chairman of the Board. |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Joseph C. Beery | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Gary S. Guthart, Ph.D. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Amal M. Johnson | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Don R. Kania, Ph.D. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Amy L. Ladd, M.D. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Keith R. Leonard, Jr. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Alan J. Levy, Ph.D. | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Jami Dover Nachtsheim | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Monica P. Reed, M.D. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Mark J. Rubash | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 2. | To approve, by advisory vote, the compensation of the Company's Named Executive Officers. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | The ratification of appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | To approve the Company's Amended and Restated 2010 Incentive Award Plan. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 378 | | | | | 0 | | | 14-Apr-2022 | 14-Apr-2022 | |
| TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 882508104 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | TXN | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 28-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US8825081040 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935560842 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Mark A. Blinn | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Todd M. Bluedorn | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Janet F. Clark | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Carrie S. Cox | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Martin S. Craighead | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Jean M. Hobby | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Michael D. Hsu | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Haviv Ilan | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Ronald Kirk | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Pamela H. Patsley | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Robert E. Sanchez | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1L. | Election of Director: Richard K. Templeton | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Board proposal regarding advisory approval of the Company's executive compensation. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Board proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Stockholder proposal to permit a combined 10% of stockholders to call a special meeting. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 35 | | | | | 0 | | | 21-Apr-2022 | 21-Apr-2022 | |
| 19-9867MS | | | | | SC ZIEGLER FAMCO FUND AND MS | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,320 | | | | 0 | | | 21-Apr-2022 | 21-Apr-2022 | |
| THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 38141G104 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | GS | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 28-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US38141G1040 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935561642 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Michele Burns | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Drew Faust | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Mark Flaherty | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Kimberley Harris | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Ellen Kullman | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Lakshmi Mittal | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Adebayo Ogunlesi | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Peter Oppenheimer | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: David Solomon | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Jan Tighe | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Jessica Uhl | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1L. | Election of Director: David Viniar | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1M. | Election of Director: Mark Winkelman | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation (Say on Pay) | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2022 | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Shareholder Proposal Regarding Charitable Giving Reporting | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: However, we believe that the shareholder proposal is unnecessary and will not result in any additional benefit to the shareholders. Rather, the proposal promotes impractical and imprudent actions that would negatively affect the business and results. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 5. | Shareholder Proposal Regarding a Policy for an Independent Chair | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having an Inside director serve as the Chairman of the board. Consequently, we prefer that companies separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO and that the Chairman be independent to further ensure board independence and accountability. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 6. | Shareholder Proposal Regarding a Policy to Ensure Lending and Underwriting do not Contribute to New Fossil Fuel Development | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We do not believe that the expenditure of the additional human and financial resources that would be required to produce another report on this subject matter would be a necessary or prudent use of Company and shareholder assets. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 7. | Shareholder Proposal Regarding Special Shareholder Meeting Thresholds | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of at least 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 628 | | | | | 0 | | | 22-Apr-2022 | 22-Apr-2022 | |
| MODERNA, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 60770K107 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | MRNA | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 28-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US60770K1079 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935561717 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1. | DIRECTOR | | | | | | | Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | 1 | | Noubar Afeyan, Ph.D. | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F3 Over-Boarded (Board Chair) According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Chairman, being responsible for the leadership of the Board and the creation of the conditions necessary for overall board and individual director effectiveness, should hold no more than one other public directorship to ensure the valuable and prudent exercise of his/her fiduciary duties as a Chairman and that his/her integrity and efficiency are not compromised. F7 Affiliation - Founder - Member of a Key Board Committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director who is the founder of the Company is considered affiliated. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| | | | 2 | | Stéphane Bancel | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 3 | | François Nader, M.D. | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | To approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our registered independent public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | To vote on a shareholder proposal relating to the feasibility of transferring intellectual property. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the approval of this proposal would result in the Company incurring unnecessary costs and expenses by duplicating efforts that are already underway and providing additional reports with information that is already available to shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 348 | | | | | 0 | | | 21-Apr-2022 | 21-Apr-2022 | |
| PFIZER INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 717081103 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | PFE | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 28-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US7170811035 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935562062 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Ronald E. Blaylock | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Albert Bourla | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Susan Desmond- Hellmann | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Joseph J. Echevarria | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Scott Gottlieb | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Helen H. Hobbs | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Susan Hockfield | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Dan R. Littman | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Shantanu Narayen | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Suzanne Nora Johnson | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: James Quincey | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1L. | Election of Director: James C. Smith | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Ratify the selection of KPMG LLP as independent registered public accounting firm for 2022 | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | 2022 advisory approval of executive compensation | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | Shareholder proposal regarding amending proxy access | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After evaluating the provisions and tenets of the proposal, we determined that the proposed resolution contemplated thereby is advisable, substantively and procedurally fair to, and in the best interests of Company and its shareholders. We recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 5. | Shareholder proposal regarding report on political expenditures congruency | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: In light of the Company's policies and oversight mechanisms related to its political contributions and activities, we believe that the shareholder proposal is unnecessary and will not result in any additional benefit to the shareholders. Rather, the proposal promotes impractical and imprudent actions that would negatively affect the business and results. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 6. | Shareholder proposal regarding report on transfer of intellectual property to potential COVID-19 manufacturers | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the proposal is not necessary and is not in the best long-term interest of the Company and its shareholders. As such, in accordance with Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 7. | Shareholder proposal regarding report on board oversight of risks related to anticompetitive practices | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the approval of this proposal would result in the Company incurring unnecessary costs and expenses by duplicating efforts that are already underway and providing additional reports with information that is already available to shareholders. As such, in accordance with Egan-Jones Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 8. | Shareholder proposal regarding report on public health costs of protecting vaccine technology | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the approval of this proposal would result in the Company incurring unnecessary costs and expenses by duplicating efforts that are already underway and providing additional reports with information that is already available to shareholders. As such, in accordance with Egan-Jones Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 5,453 | | | | 0 | | | 22-Apr-2022 | 22-Apr-2022 | |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 478160104 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | JNJ | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 28-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US4781601046 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935562997 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Darius Adamczyk | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Mary C. Beckerle | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: D. Scott Davis | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F20 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Ian E. L. Davis | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F20 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Jennifer A. Doudna | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Joaquin Duato | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Alex Gorsky | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F22 Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the leadership of the Chairman of the Board. |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Marillyn A. Hewson | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F20 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Hubert Joly | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F20 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Mark B. McClellan | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Anne M. Mulcahy | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1L. | Election of Director: A. Eugene Washington | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F20 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1M. | Election of Director: Mark A. Weinberger | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1N. | Election of Director: Nadja Y. West | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Approval of the Company's 2022 Long- Term Incentive Plan. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account the maximum amount of shareholder equity dilution this proposal could cause, as well as both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the passage of this plan as proposed by the board of directors. We recommend the board seek to align CEO pay more closely with the performance of the company and work to reduce the cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Ratification of Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 5. | Proposal Withdrawn (Federal Securities Laws Mandatory Arbitration Bylaw). | Shareholder | Against | | | None | | | | | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the approval of this shareholder proposal is not advisable and is not in the best interests of the shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 6. | Civil Rights, Equity, Diversity & Inclusion Audit Proposal. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that a company's success depends upon its ability to embrace diversity in the community it serves. As such, we believe that adoption of this proposal is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. As such, in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 7. | Third Party Racial Justice Audit. | | | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that a company's success depends upon its ability to embrace diversity in the community it serves. As such, we believe that adoption of this proposal is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. As such, in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 8. | Report on Government Financial Support and Access to COVID-19 Vaccines and Therapeutics. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the approval of this shareholder proposal is not advisable and is not in the best interests of the shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 9. | Report on Public Health Costs of Protecting Vaccine Technology. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the approval of this shareholder proposal is not advisable and is not in the best interests of the shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 10. | Discontinue Global Sales of Baby Powder Containing Talc. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Given the Company's commitment and accountability to provide its consumers with products that are as safe as possible, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. | |
| 11. | Request for Charitable Donations Disclosure. | | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: However, we believe that the shareholder proposal is unnecessary and will not result in any additional benefit to the shareholders. Rather, the proposal promotes impractical and imprudent actions that would negatively affect the business and results. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 12. | Third Party Review and Report on Lobbying Activities Alignment with Position on Universal Health Coverage. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: In light of the Company's policies and oversight mechanisms related to lobbying activities, we believe that the shareholder proposal is unnecessary and will not result in any additional benefit to the shareholders. Rather, the proposal promotes impractical and imprudent actions that would negatively affect the business and results. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 13. | Adopt Policy to Include Legal and Compliance Costs in Incentive Compensation Metrics. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After evaluating the provisions and tenets of the proposal, we determined that the proposed resolution contemplated thereby is advisable, substantively and procedurally fair to, and in the best interests of Company and its shareholders. We recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 14. | CEO Compensation to Weigh Workforce Pay and Ownership. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that approval of the proposal is necessary and warranted in the Company. Pay disparities in companies, in our view, could bring operational risks and reputational damage that is detrimental to shareholder value. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 537 | | | | | 0 | | | 25-Apr-2022 | 25-Apr-2022 | |
| 19-9867MS | | | | | SC ZIEGLER FAMCO FUND AND MS | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 2,510 | | | | 0 | | | 25-Apr-2022 | 25-Apr-2022 | |
| EDISON INTERNATIONAL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 281020107 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | EIX | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 28-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US2810201077 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935563026 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Jeanne Beliveau-Dunn | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Michael C. Camuñez | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Vanessa C.L. Chang | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1D. | Election of Director: James T. Morris | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Timothy T. O'Toole | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Pedro J. Pizarro | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Marcy L. Reed | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Carey A. Smith | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Linda G. Stuntz | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Peter J. Taylor | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F3 Over-Boarded (Board Chair) According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Chairman, being responsible for the leadership of the Board and the creation of the conditions necessary for overall board and individual director effectiveness, should hold no more than one other public directorship to ensure the valuable and prudent exercise of his/her fiduciary duties as a Chairman and that his/her integrity and efficiency are not compromised. |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Keith Trent | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Ratification of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,075 | | | | 0 | | | 12-Apr-2022 | 12-Apr-2022 | |
| SNAP-ON INCORPORATED | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 833034101 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | SNA | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 28-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US8330341012 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935565979 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: David C. Adams | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Karen L. Daniel | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Ruth Ann M. Gillis | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: James P. Holden | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Nathan J. Jones | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Henry W. Knueppel | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1G. | Election of Director: W. Dudley Lehman | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| | | F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Nicholas T. Pinchuk | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Gregg M. Sherrill | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Donald J. Stebbins | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Proposal to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Snap-on Incorporated's independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Advisory vote to approve the compensation of Snap-on Incorporated's named executive officers, as disclosed in "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" and "Executive Compensation Information" in the Proxy Statement. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 878 | | | | | 0 | | | 12-Apr-2022 | 12-Apr-2022 | |
| CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 171340102 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | CHD | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 28-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US1713401024 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935566779 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director to serve for a term of one year: Bradlen S. Cashaw | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director to serve for a term of one year: James R. Craigie | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director to serve for a term of one year: Matthew T. Farrell | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F21 Combined CEO and Board Chair Positions and the Company Earns a Board Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having the CEO or former CEO serve as the Chairman of the Board. Consequently, we prefer that companies focus on the following areas to improve its corporate governance practices: separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO, hold annual director elections, have one class of voting stock only, have key board committees consisting of independent directors and majority of independent directors on board and include non-binding compensation vote on agenda to further ensure board independence and accountability. F22 Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the leadership of the Chairman of the Board. |
| 1D. | Election of Director to serve for a term of one year: Bradley C. Irwin | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| | | F20 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1E. | Election of Director to serve for a term of one year: Penry W. Price | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F20 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1F. | Election of Director to serve for a term of one year: Susan G. Saideman | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director to serve for a term of one year: Ravichandra K. Saligram | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director to serve for a term of one year: Robert K. Shearer | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1I. | Election of Director to serve for a term of one year: Janet S. Vergis | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director to serve for a term of one year: Arthur B. Winkleblack | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| | | F20 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1K. | Election of Director to serve for a term of one year: Laurie J. Yoler | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F20 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 2. | An advisory vote to approve compensation of our named executive officers. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Proposal to approve an amendment and restatement of the Church & Dwight Co., Inc. Amended and Restated Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account the maximum amount of shareholder equity dilution this proposal could cause, as well as both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the passage of this plan as proposed by the board of directors. We recommend the board seek to align CEO pay more closely with the performance of the company and work to reduce the cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 5. | Stockholder Proposal - Special Shareholder Meeting Improvement. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of at least 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,277 | | | | 0 | | | 13-Apr-2022 | 13-Apr-2022 | |
| GLOBE LIFE INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 37959E102 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | GL | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 28-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US37959E1029 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935568759 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Linda L. Addison | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Marilyn A. Alexander | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Cheryl D. Alston | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Mark A. Blinn | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: James P. Brannen | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Jane Buchan | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Gary L. Coleman | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Larry M. Hutchison | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Robert W. Ingram | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Steven P. Johnson | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Darren M. Rebelez | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1L. | Election of Director: Mary E. Thigpen | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Ratification of Auditors. | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Approval of 2021 Executive Compensation. | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 918 | | | | | 0 | | | 13-Apr-2022 | 13-Apr-2022 | |
| THE BOEING COMPANY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 097023105 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | BA | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 29-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US0970231058 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935558621 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Robert A. Bradway | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: David L. Calhoun | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Lynne M. Doughtie | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Lynn J. Good | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Stayce D. Harris | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Akhil Johri | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: David L. Joyce | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Lawrence W. Kellner | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Steven M. Mollenkopf | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1J. | Election of Director: John M. Richardson | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Ronald A. Williams | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 2. | Approve, on an Advisory Basis, Named Executive Officer Compensation. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Approve The Boeing Company Global Stock Purchase Plan. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | Ratify the Appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Independent Auditor for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 5. | Additional Report on Lobbying Activities. | | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that it is in the best interests of the Company and the stockholders to belong to industry associations and coalitions, where the Company benefits from the general business, technical, and industry standard-setting expertise these organizations provide. We furthermore believe that the proposal seeks unnecessary line-item disclosure of lobbying expenditures. We believe that the requested report is unnecessary and would require expenditures and the use of Company resources without providing any meaningful benefit to the shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 6. | Additional Report on Charitable Contributions. | | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the Company carefully evaluates and reviews the Company's charitable activities, and makes information regarding the Company's corporate giving publicly available, and we do not believe that implementing the proposal would justify the administrative costs and efforts, nor would it provide a corresponding meaningful benefit to the Company's shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 7. | Reduce Threshold to Call Special Meetings from 25% to 10%. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 8. | Report on Net Zero Indicator. | | | Shareholder | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,183 | | | | 0 | | | 20-Apr-2022 | 20-Apr-2022 | |
| ABBOTT LABORATORIES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 002824100 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | ABT | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 29-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US0028241000 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935562909 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1. | DIRECTOR | | | | | | | Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | 1 | | R. J. Alpern | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| | | | 2 | | S. E. Blount | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 3 | | R. B. Ford | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 4 | | P. Gonzalez | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 5 | | M. A. Kumbier | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 6 | | D. W. McDew | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 7 | | N. McKinstry | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 8 | | W. A. Osborn | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| | | | 9 | | M. F. Roman | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 10 | | D. J. Starks | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 11 | | J. G. Stratton | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 12 | | G. F. Tilton | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 2. | Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP As Auditors | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Say on Pay - An Advisory Vote on the Approval of Executive Compensation | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | Shareholder Proposal - Special Shareholder Meeting Threshold | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of at least 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 5. | Shareholder Proposal - Independent Board Chairman | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having an Inside director serve as the Chairman of the board. Consequently, we prefer that companies separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO and that the Chairman be independent to further ensure board independence and accountability. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 6. | Shareholder Proposal - Rule 10b5-1 Plans | | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that approval of the proposal is unnecessarily restrictive and burdensome in light of the pending SEC rules relating to Rule 10b5-1 and Abbott's protections against insider trading. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 7. | Shareholder Proposal - Lobbying Disclosure | | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that it is in the best interests of the Company and the stockholders to belong to industry associations and coalitions, where the Company benefits from the general business, technical, and industry standard-setting expertise these organizations provide. We furthermore believe that the proposal seeks unnecessary line-item disclosure of lobbying expenditures. We believe that the requested report is unnecessary and would require expenditures and the use of Company resources without providing any meaningful benefit to the shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 8. | Shareholder Proposal - Antimicrobial Resistance Report | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that implementation of this proposal will provide specific information about the Company's renewable energy usage, and discuss the management processes and policies used to evaluate the sourcing of renewable energy. In accordance with Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,387 | | | | 0 | | | 25-Apr-2022 | 25-Apr-2022 | |
| ZIONS BANCORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 989701107 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | ZION | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 29-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US9897011071 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935563569 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Maria Contreras-Sweet | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Gary L. Crittenden | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Suren K. Gupta | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Claire A. Huang | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Vivian S. Lee | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Scott J. McLean | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Edward F. Murphy | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Stephen D. Quinn | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Harris H. Simmons | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Aaron B. Skonnard | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Barbara A. Yastine | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm to audit the Bank's financial statements for the current fiscal year. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Approval, on a nonbinding advisory basis, of the compensation paid to the Bank's named executive officers with respect to fiscal year ended December 31, 2021. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | Approval of the Bank's 2022 Omnibus Incentive Plan. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 2,471 | | | | 0 | | | 17-Apr-2022 | 17-Apr-2022 | |
| ASTRAZENECA PLC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 046353108 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | AZN | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 29-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US0463531089 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935582317 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1. | To receive the Company's Accounts, the Reports of the Directors and Auditor and the Strategic Report for the year ended 31 December 2021 | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | To confirm dividends | | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | To reappoint PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Auditor | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral. This audit firm has earned a grade of Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After, taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST these Resolutions. |
| 4. | To authorise the Directors to agree the remuneration of the Auditor | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral. This audit firm has earned a grade of Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After, taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST these Resolutions. |
| 5A. | Re-election of Director: Leif Johansson | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliated Outside director serving as a member of the Audit and Compensation Committees According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, with the exception of diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 5B. | Re-election of Director: Pascal Soriot | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5C. | Election of Director: Aradhana Sarin | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5D. | Re-election of Director: Philip Broadley | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5E. | Re-election of Director: Euan Ashley | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5F. | Re-election of Director: Michel Demaré | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5G. | Re-election of Director: Deborah DiSanzo | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5H. | Re-election of Director: Diana Layfield | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5I. | Re-election of Director: Sheri McCoy | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5J. | Re-election of Director: Tony Mok | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5K. | Re-election of Director: Nazneen Rahman | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5L. | Election of Director: Andreas Rummelt | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5M. | Re-election of Director: Marcus Wallenberg | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 6. | To approve the Annual Report on Remuneration for the year ended 31 December 2021 | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 7. | To authorise limited political donations | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 8. | To authorise the Directors to allot shares | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 9. | To authorise the Directors to disapply pre- emption rights (Special Resolution) | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 10. | To authorise the Directors to further disapply pre-emption rights for acquisitions and specified capital investments (Special Resolution) | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 11. | To authorise the Company to purchase its own shares (Special Resolution) | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 12. | To reduce the notice period for general meetings (Special Resolution) | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 13. | To extend the AstraZenca PLC 2012 Savings Related Share Option Scheme | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,753 | | | | 0 | | | 07-Apr-2022 | 07-Apr-2022 | |
| ASTRAZENECA PLC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 046353108 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | AZN | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 29-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US0463531089 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935608729 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1. | To receive the Company's Accounts, the Reports of the Directors and Auditor and the Strategic Report for the year ended 31 December 2021 | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | To confirm dividends | | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | To reappoint PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Auditor | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral. This audit firm has earned a grade of Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After, taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST these Resolutions. |
| 4. | To authorise the Directors to agree the remuneration of the Auditor | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral. This audit firm has earned a grade of Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After, taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST these Resolutions. |
| 5A. | Re-election of Director: Leif Johansson | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliated Outside director serving as a member of the Audit and Compensation Committees According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, with the exception of diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 5B. | Re-election of Director: Pascal Soriot | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5C. | Election of Director: Aradhana Sarin | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5D. | Re-election of Director: Philip Broadley | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5E. | Re-election of Director: Euan Ashley | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5F. | Re-election of Director: Michel Demaré | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5G. | Re-election of Director: Deborah DiSanzo | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5H. | Re-election of Director: Diana Layfield | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5I. | Re-election of Director: Sheri McCoy | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5J. | Re-election of Director: Tony Mok | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5K. | Re-election of Director: Nazneen Rahman | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5L. | Election of Director: Andreas Rummelt | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5M. | Re-election of Director: Marcus Wallenberg | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 6. | To approve the Annual Report on Remuneration for the year ended 31 December 2021 | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 7. | To authorise limited political donations | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 8. | To authorise the Directors to allot shares | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 9. | To authorise the Directors to disapply pre- emption rights (Special Resolution) | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 10. | To authorise the Directors to further disapply pre-emption rights for acquisitions and specified capital investments (Special Resolution) | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 11. | To authorise the Company to purchase its own shares (Special Resolution) | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 12. | To reduce the notice period for general meetings (Special Resolution) | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 13. | To extend the AstraZenca PLC 2012 Savings Related Share Option Scheme | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,753 | | | | 0 | | | 14-Apr-2022 | 14-Apr-2022 | |
| BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 084670702 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | BRKB | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 30-Apr-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US0846707026 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935562137 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1. | DIRECTOR | | | | | | | Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | 1 | | Warren E. Buffett | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F21 Combined CEO and Board Chair Positions and the Company Earns a Board Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having the CEO or former CEO serve as the Chairman of the Board. Consequently, we prefer that companies focus on the following areas to improve its corporate governance practices: separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO, hold annual director elections, have one class of voting stock only, have key board committees consisting of independent directors and majority of independent directors on board and include non-binding compensation vote on agenda to further ensure board independence and accountability. |
| | | | 2 | | Charles T. Munger | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 3 | | Gregory E. Abel | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 4 | | Howard G. Buffett | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 5 | | Susan A. Buffett | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 6 | | Stephen B. Burke | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| | | | 7 | | Kenneth I. Chenault | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 8 | | Christopher C. Davis | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 9 | | Susan L. Decker | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 10 | | David S. Gottesman | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| | | | 11 | | Charlotte Guyman | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 12 | | Ajit Jain | | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 13 | | Ronald L. Olson | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 14 | | Wallace R. Weitz | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 15 | | Meryl B. Witmer | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Shareholder proposal regarding the adoption of a policy requiring that the Board Chair be an independent director. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having an Inside director serve as the Chairman of the board. Consequently, we prefer that companies separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO and that the Chairman be independent to further ensure board independence and accountability. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 3. | Shareholder proposal regarding the publishing of an annual assessment addressing how the Corporation manages climate risks. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the report on climate change will develop new methods that can be applied globally when sufficient observations exist. Acknowledging climate change as an inevitable factor, and recognizing the need to adapt, involves bold decisions by business. Therefore, we believe that companies should review how climate change impacts the economy and portfolio companies and evaluate how shareholder resolutions on climate change may impact long-term shareholder value as it votes proxies. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 4. | Shareholder proposal regarding how the Corporation intends to measure, disclose and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that setting clear-cut goals will help the Company reduce its regulatory risk related to GHG emissions, financial risk by decreasing volatility of energy prices, and overall expenditure on energy by implementing a disciplined business strategy to cut emissions from its operations. We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval. Here, we find that approval of the proposal will provide the transparency shareholders need to evaluate such activities. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 5. | Shareholder proposal regarding the reporting of the Corporation's diversity, equity and inclusion efforts. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval. We believe that the proposal would encourage good governance and enhance shareholder value by bringing together a diverse range of skills and experience necessary in building a constructive and challenging workforce. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 395 | | | | | 0 | | | 25-Apr-2022 | 25-Apr-2022 | |
| 19-9867MS | | | | | SC ZIEGLER FAMCO FUND AND MS | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,230 | | | | 0 | | | 25-Apr-2022 | 25-Apr-2022 | |
| ELI LILLY AND COMPANY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 532457108 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | LLY | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 02-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US5324571083 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935562858 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director to serve a three-year term: Ralph Alvarez | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director to serve a three-year term: Kimberly H. Johnson | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director to serve a three-year term: Juan R. Luciano | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation paid to the company's named executive officers. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent auditor for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Approval of amendments to the company's Articles of Incorporation to eliminate the classified board structure. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5. | Approval of amendments to the company's Articles of Incorporation to eliminate supermajority voting provisions. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 6. | Approval of amendments to the company's Articles of Incorporation to give shareholders the ability to amend the company's bylaws. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 7. | Shareholder proposal to amend the bylaws to require an independent board chair. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having an Inside director serve as the Chairman of the board. Consequently, we prefer that companies separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO and that the Chairman be independent to further ensure board independence and accountability. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 8. | Shareholder proposal to publish an annual report disclosing lobbying activities. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that it is in the best interests of the Company and the stockholders to belong to industry associations and coalitions, where the Company benefits from the general business, technical, and industry standard-setting expertise these organizations provide. We furthermore believe that the proposal seeks unnecessary line-item disclosure of lobbying expenditures. We believe that the requested report is unnecessary and would require expenditures and the use of Company resources without providing any meaningful benefit to the shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 9. | Shareholder proposal to disclose lobbying activities and alignment with public policy positions and statements. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: In light of the Company's policies and oversight mechanisms related to its political contributions and activities, we believe that the shareholder proposal is unnecessary and will not result in any additional benefit to the shareholders. Rather, the proposal promotes impractical and imprudent actions that would negatively affect the business and results. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 10. | Shareholder proposal to report oversight of risks related to anticompetitive pricing strategies. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 979 | | | | | 0 | | | 29-Apr-2022 | 29-Apr-2022 | |
| BAXTER INTERNATIONAL INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 071813109 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | BAX | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 03-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US0718131099 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935566630 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: José (Joe) Almeida | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F21 Combined CEO and Board Chair Positions and the Company Earns a Board Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having the CEO or former CEO serve as the Chairman of the Board. Consequently, we prefer that companies focus on the following areas to improve its corporate governance practices: separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO, hold annual director elections, have one class of voting stock only, have key board committees consisting of independent directors and majority of independent directors on board and include non-binding compensation vote on agenda to further ensure board independence and accountability. |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Thomas F. Chen | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Peter S. Hellman | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Michael F. Mahoney | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Patricia B. Morrison | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Stephen N. Oesterle | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Nancy M. Schlichting | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Cathy R. Smith | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Albert P.L. Stroucken | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Amy A. Wendell | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1K. | Election of Director: David S. Wilkes | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Vote to Approve a Certificate of Incorporation Amendment to Permit Stockholder Action by Written Consent | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5. | Vote to Approve a Certificate of Incorporation Amendment to Lower the Special Meeting Threshold | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of at least 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the proposal, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 6. | Stockholder Proposal - Special Shareholder Meeting Improvement | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of at least 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 7. | Stockholder Proposal - Independent Board Chairman | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having an Inside director serve as the Chairman of the board. Consequently, we prefer that companies separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO and that the Chairman be independent to further ensure board independence and accountability. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,733 | | | | 0 | | | 25-Apr-2022 | 25-Apr-2022 | |
| AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 025816109 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | AXP | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 03-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US0258161092 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935569484 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director for a term of one year: Thomas J. Baltimore | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director for a term of one year: Charlene Barshefsky | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director for a term of one year: John J. Brennan | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director for a term of one year: Peter Chernin | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1E. | Election of Director for a term of one year: Ralph de la Vega | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director for a term of one year: Michael O. Leavitt | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director for a term of one year: Theodore J. Leonsis | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1H. | Election of Director for a term of one year: Karen L. Parkhill | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director for a term of one year: Charles E. Phillips | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director for a term of one year: Lynn A. Pike | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director for a term of one year: Stephen J. Squeri | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1L. | Election of Director for a term of one year: Daniel L. Vasella | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1M. | Election of Director for a term of one year: Lisa W. Wardell | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1N. | Election of Director for a term of one year: Christopher D. Young | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Ratification of appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent registered public accounting firm for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Approval, on an advisory basis, of the Company's executive compensation. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | Shareholder Proposal Relating to Independent Board Chairman. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having an Inside director serve as the Chairman of the board. Consequently, we prefer that companies separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO and that the Chairman be independent to further ensure board independence and accountability. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 628 | | | | | 0 | | | 25-Apr-2022 | 25-Apr-2022 | |
| BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 110122108 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | BMY | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 03-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US1101221083 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935571782 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A) | Election of Director: Peter J. Arduini | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1B) | Election of Director: Giovanni Caforio, M.D. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C) | Election of Director: Julia A. Haller, M.D. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D) | Election of Director: Manuel Hidalgo Medina, M.D., Ph.D. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E) | Election of Director: Paula A. Price | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F) | Election of Director: Derica W. Rice | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1G) | Election of Director: Theodore R. Samuels | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H) | Election of Director: Gerald L. Storch | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention |
| | | Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1I) | Election of Director: Karen H. Vousden, Ph.D. | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1J) | Election of Director: Phyllis R. Yale | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Advisory Vote to Approve the Compensation of our Named Executive Officers. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Ratification of the Appointment of an Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Shareholder Proposal to Lower the Ownership Threshold for Special Shareholder Meetings to 10%. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of at least 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 5. | Shareholder Proposal on the Adoption of a Board Policy that the Chairperson of the Board be an Independent Director. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having an Inside director serve as the Chairman of the board. Consequently, we prefer that companies separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO and that the Chairman be independent to further ensure board independence and accountability. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,619 | | | | 0 | | | 25-Apr-2022 | 25-Apr-2022 | |
| EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 28176E108 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | EW | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 03-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US28176E1082 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935572481 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1.1 | Election of Director: Kieran T. Gallahue | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1.2 | Election of Director: Leslie S. Heisz | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1.3 | Election of Director: Paul A. LaViolette | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1.4 | Election of Director: Steven R. Loranger | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1.5 | Election of Director: Martha H. Marsh | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1.6 | Election of Director: Michael A. Mussallem | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F22 Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the leadership of the Chairman of the Board. |
| 1.7 | Election of Director: Ramona Sequeira | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1.8 | Election of Director: Nicholas J. Valeriani | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Stockholder Proposal for an Advisory Vote to Reduce the Share Ownership Threshold to Call a Special Meeting | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of at least 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 734 | | | | | 0 | | | 25-Apr-2022 | 25-Apr-2022 | |
| GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 369604301 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | GE | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 04-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US3696043013 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935567480 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Stephen Angel | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Sébastien Bazin | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Ashton Carter | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: H. Lawrence Culp, Jr. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Francisco D'Souza | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F19 Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Edward Garden | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F19 Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Isabella Goren | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Thomas Horton | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F19 Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are |
| | | centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Risa Lavizzo-Mourey | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | �� | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Catherine Lesjak | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Tomislav Mihaljevic | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1L. | Election of Director: Paula Rosput Reynolds | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F19 Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1M. | Election of Director: Leslie Seidman | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Advisory Approval of Our Named Executives' Compensation | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Ratification of Deloitte as Independent Auditor for 2022 | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | Approval of the 2022 Long-Term Incentive Plan | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account the maximum amount of shareholder equity dilution this proposal could cause, as well as both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the passage of this plan as proposed by the board of directors. We recommend the board seek to align CEO pay more closely with the performance of the company and work to reduce the cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 5. | Require the Cessation of Stock Option and Bonus Programs | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. | |
| 6. | Require Shareholder Ratification of Termination Pay | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. | |
| 7. | Require the Board Nominate an Employee Representative Director | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 2,097 | | | | 0 | | | 28-Apr-2022 | 28-Apr-2022 | |
| PEPSICO, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 713448108 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | PEP | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 04-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US7134481081 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935567997 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Segun Agbaje | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Shona L. Brown | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Cesar Conde | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Ian Cook | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Edith W. Cooper | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Dina Dublon | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Michelle Gass | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Ramon L. Laguarta | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Dave Lewis | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: David C. Page | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Robert C. Pohlad | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1L. | Election of Director: Daniel Vasella | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1M. | Election of Director: Darren Walker | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1N. | Election of Director: Alberto Weisser | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 2. | Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Advisory approval of the Company's executive compensation. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | Shareholder Proposal - Independent Board Chairman. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having an Inside director serve as the Chairman of the board. Consequently, we prefer that companies separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO and that the Chairman be independent to further ensure board independence and accountability. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 5. | Shareholder Proposal - Report on Global Public Policy and Political Influence Outside the U.S. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: In light of the Company's policies and oversight mechanisms related to its charitable and political contributions and activities, we believe that the shareholder proposal is unnecessary and will not result in any additional benefit to the shareholders. Rather, the proposal promotes impractical and imprudent actions that would negatively affect the business and results. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 6. | Shareholder Proposal - Report on Public Health Costs. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that improved transparency and accountability will enhance the Company's commitment to long-term sustainability. In accordance with Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,867 | | | | 0 | | | 27-Apr-2022 | 27-Apr-2022 | |
| PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 718172109 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | PM | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 04-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US7181721090 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935568355 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Brant Bonin Bough | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: André Calantzopoulos | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F22 Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the leadership of the Chairman of the Board. |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Michel Combes | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Juan José Daboub | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Werner Geissler | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Lisa A. Hook | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Jun Makihara | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Kalpana Morparia | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Lucio A. Noto | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Jacek Olczak | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Frederik Paulsen | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1L. | Election of Director: Robert B. Polet | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1M. | Election of Director: Dessislava Temperley | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1N. | Election of Director: Shlomo Yanai | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Advisory Vote Approving Executive Compensation. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | 2022 Performance Incentive Plan. | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | Ratification of the Selection of Independent Auditors. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 5. | Shareholder Proposal to phase out all health-hazardous and addictive products produced by Philip Morris International Inc. by 2025. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the proposal is not necessary and is not in the best long-term interest of the Company and its shareholders. As such, in accordance with Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,610 | | | | 0 | | | 28-Apr-2022 | 28-Apr-2022 | |
| STRYKER CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 863667101 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | SYK | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 04-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US8636671013 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935568711 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A) | Election of Director: Mary K. Brainerd | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B) | Election of Director: Giovanni Caforio, M.D. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C) | Election of Director: Srikant M. Datar, Ph.D. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D) | Election of Director: Allan C. Golston (Lead Independent Director) | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E) | Election of Director: Kevin A. Lobo (Chair of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President) | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F) | Election of Director: Sherilyn S. McCoy | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G) | Election of Director: Andrew K. Silvernail | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H) | Election of Director: Lisa M. Skeete Tatum | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I) | Election of Director: Ronda E. Stryker | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J) | Election of Director: Rajeev Suri | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2) | Ratification of Appointment of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3) | Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4) | Shareholder Proposal to Amend Proxy Access Terms. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval. We believe that because the board of directors serves as the representatives of shareholders, shareholders should have the right to nominate their own representatives. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 334 | | | | | 0 | | | 28-Apr-2022 | 28-Apr-2022 | |
| GILEAD SCIENCES, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 375558103 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | GILD | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 04-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US3755581036 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935570134 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Jacqueline K. Barton, Ph.D. | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F20 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Jeffrey A. Bluestone, Ph.D. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Sandra J. Horning, M.D. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Kelly A. Kramer | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F20 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Kevin E. Lofton | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F20 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Harish Manwani | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F20 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Daniel P. O'Day | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F22 Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the leadership of the Chairman of the Board. |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Javier J. Rodriguez | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Anthony Welters | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F20 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 2. | To ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers as presented in the Proxy Statement. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | To approve the Gilead Sciences, Inc. 2022 Equity Incentive Plan. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account the maximum amount of shareholder equity dilution this proposal could cause, as well as both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the passage of this plan as proposed by the board of directors. We recommend the board seek to align CEO pay more closely with the performance of the company and work to reduce the cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 5. | To vote on a stockholder proposal, if properly presented at the meeting, requesting that the Board adopt a policy that the Chairperson of the Board of Directors be an independent director. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having an Inside director serve as the Chairman of the board. Consequently, we prefer that companies separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO and that the Chairman be independent to further ensure board independence and accountability. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 6. | To vote on a stockholder proposal, if properly presented at the meeting, requesting that the Board include one member from Gilead's non-management employees. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that pertinent matters in the boardroom should be enacted by the Company's independent directors. As such, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. | |
| 7. | To vote on a stockholder proposal, if properly presented at the meeting, requesting a 10% threshold to call a special stockholder meeting. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of at least 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 8. | To vote on a stockholder proposal, if properly presented at the meeting, requesting that the Board publish a third- party review of Gilead's lobbying activities. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that it is in the best interests of the Company and the stockholders to belong to industry associations and coalitions, where the Company benefits from the general business, technical, and industry standard-setting expertise these organizations provide. We furthermore believe that the proposal seeks unnecessary line-item disclosure of lobbying expenditures. We believe that the requested report is unnecessary and would require expenditures and the use of Company resources without providing any meaningful benefit to the shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 9. | To vote on a stockholder proposal, if properly presented at the meeting, requesting a Board report on oversight of risks related to anticompetitive practices. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 2,589 | | | | 0 | | | 29-Apr-2022 | 29-Apr-2022 | |
| CME GROUP INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 12572Q105 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | CME | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 04-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US12572Q1058 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935571287 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Equity Director: Terrence A. Duffy | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F21 Combined CEO and Board Chair Positions and the Company Earns a Board Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having the CEO or former CEO serve as the Chairman of the Board. Consequently, we prefer that companies focus on the following areas to improve its corporate governance practices: separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO, hold annual director elections, have one class of voting stock only, have key board committees consisting of independent directors and majority of independent directors on board and include non-binding compensation vote on agenda to further ensure board independence and accountability. |
| 1B. | Election of Equity Director: Timothy S. Bitsberger | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F20 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1C. | Election of Equity Director: Charles P. Carey | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| | | F20 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1D. | Election of Equity Director: Dennis H. Chookaszian | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1E. | Election of Equity Director: Bryan T. Durkin | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Equity Director: Ana Dutra | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F20 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1G. | Election of Equity Director: Martin J. Gepsman | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1H. | Election of Equity Director: Larry G. Gerdes | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1I. | Election of Equity Director: Daniel R. Glickman | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| | | F20 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1J. | Election of Equity Director: Daniel G. Kaye | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Equity Director: Phyllis M. Lockett | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1L. | Election of Equity Director: Deborah J. Lucas | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1M. | Election of Equity Director: Terry L. Savage | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F20 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1N. | Election of Equity Director: Rahael Seifu | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1O. | Election of Equity Director: William R. Shepard | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1P. | Election of Equity Director: Howard J. Siegel | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1Q. | Election of Equity Director: Dennis A. Suskind | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 2. | Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | Approval of the Amended and Restated CME Group Inc. Omnibus Stock Plan. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account the maximum amount of shareholder equity dilution this proposal could cause, as well as both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the passage of this plan as proposed by the board of directors. We recommend the board seek to align CEO pay more closely with the performance of the company and work to reduce the cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 5. | Approval of the Amended and Restated CME Group Inc. Director Stock Plan. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 6. | Approval of the Amended and Restated CME Group Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 746 | | | | | 0 | | | 27-Apr-2022 | 27-Apr-2022 | |
| CSX CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 126408103 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | CSX | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 04-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US1264081035 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935571833 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Donna M. Alvarado | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Thomas P. Bostick | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: James M. Foote | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Steven T. Halverson | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Paul C. Hilal | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: David M. Moffett | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Linda H. Riefler | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Suzanne M. Vautrinot | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: James L. Wainscott | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: J. Steven Whisler | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1k. | Election of Director: John J. Zillmer | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F3 Over-Boarded (Board Chair) According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Chairman, being responsible for the leadership of the Board and the creation of the conditions necessary for overall board and individual director effectiveness, should hold no more than one other public directorship to ensure the valuable and prudent exercise of his/her fiduciary duties as a Chairman and that his/her integrity and efficiency are not compromised. |
| 2. | The ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Advisory (non-binding) resolution to approve compensation for the Company's named executive officers. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 3,837 | | | | 0 | | | 26-Apr-2022 | 26-Apr-2022 | |
| PROLOGIS, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 74340W103 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | PLD | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 04-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US74340W1036 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935572380 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Hamid R. Moghadam | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Cristina G. Bita | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: George L. Fotiades | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Lydia H. Kennard | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Irving F. Lyons III | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Avid Modjtabai | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: David P. O'Connor | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Olivier Piani | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Jeffrey L. Skelton | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Carl B. Webb | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1K. | Election of Director: William D. Zollars | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 2. | Advisory Vote to Approve the Company's Executive Compensation for 2021 | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Ratification of the Appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company's Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the Year 2022 | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 684 | | | | | 0 | | | 25-Apr-2022 | 25-Apr-2022 | |
| S&P GLOBAL INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 78409V104 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | SPGI | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 04-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US78409V1044 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935575691 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Marco Alverà | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Jacques Esculier | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Gay Huey Evans | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: William D. Green | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Stephanie C. Hill | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Rebecca Jacoby | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Robert P. Kelly | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Ian Paul Livingston | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Deborah D. McWhinney | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Maria R. Morris | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Douglas L. Peterson | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1L. | Election of Director: Edward B. Rust, Jr. | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1M. | Election of Director: Richard E. Thornburgh | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1N. | Election of Director: Gregory Washington | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Approve, on an advisory basis, the executive compensation program for the Company's named executive officers. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditor for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 148 | | | | | 0 | | | 25-Apr-2022 | 25-Apr-2022 | |
| DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 26441C204 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | DUK | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 05-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US26441C2044 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935564838 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1. | DIRECTOR | | | | | | | Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | 1 | | Derrick Burks | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 2 | | Annette K. Clayton | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 3 | | Theodore F. Craver, Jr. | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 4 | | Robert M. Davis | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 5 | | Caroline Dorsa | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 6 | | W. Roy Dunbar | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 7 | | Nicholas C. Fanandakis | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 8 | | Lynn J. Good | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F22 Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the leadership of the Chairman of the Board. |
| | | | 9 | | John T. Herron | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 10 | | Idalene F. Kesner | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 11 | | E. Marie McKee | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 12 | | Michael J. Pacilio | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 13 | | Thomas E. Skains | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 14 | | William E. Webster, Jr. | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Duke Energy's independent registered public accounting firm for 2022 | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Advisory vote to approve Duke Energy's named executive officer compensation | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | Shareholder proposal regarding shareholder right to call for a special shareholder meeting | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of at least 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 2,017 | | | | 0 | | | 28-Apr-2022 | 28-Apr-2022 | |
| CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 14040H105 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | COF | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 05-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US14040H1059 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935565501 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Richard D. Fairbank | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Ime Archibong | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Christine Detrick | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Ann Fritz Hackett | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Peter Thomas Killalea | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Cornelis "Eli" Leenaars | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: François Locoh-Donou | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Peter E. Raskind | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Eileen Serra | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Mayo A. Shattuck III | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Bradford H. Warner | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1L. | Election of Director: Catherine G. West | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1M. | Election of Director: Craig Anthony Williams | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Advisory approval of Capital One's 2021 Named Executive Officer compensation. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as independent registered public accounting firm of Capital One for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 322 | | | | | 0 | | | 26-Apr-2022 | 26-Apr-2022 | |
| ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND COMPANY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 039483102 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | ADM | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 05-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US0394831020 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935568848 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: M.S. Burke | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1B. | Election of Director: T. Colbert | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: T.K. Crews | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1D. | Election of Director: D.E. Felsinger | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: S.F. Harrison | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1F. | Election of Director: J.R. Luciano | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F22 Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Rating of Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Rating. We believe that cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the leadership of the Chairman of the Board. |
| 1G. | Election of Director: P.J. Moore | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1H. | Election of Director: F.J. Sanchez | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: D.A. Sandler | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: L.Z. Schlitz | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1K. | Election of Director: K.R. Westbrook | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 2. | Ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation. | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Stockholder Proposal to Remove the One- Year Holding Period Requirement to Call a Special Stockholder Meeting. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of at least 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 5. | Stockholder Proposal Regarding Issuance of a Report on Pesticide Use in Supply Chains. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the shareholder proposal is unnecessary and will not result in any additional benefit to the shareholders. Rather, the proposal promotes impractical and imprudent actions that would negatively affect the business and results. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 715 | | | | | 0 | | | 29-Apr-2022 | 29-Apr-2022 | |
| BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 101137107 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | BSX | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 05-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US1011371077 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935569941 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Nelda J. Connors | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Charles J. Dockendorff | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Yoshiaki Fujimori | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Donna A. James | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Edward J. Ludwig | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Michael F. Mahoney | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F22 Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the leadership of the Chairman of the Board. |
| 1G. | Election of Director: David J. Roux | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: John E. Sununu | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1I. | Election of Director: David S. Wichmann | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Ellen M. Zane | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | To approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, named executive officer compensation. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2022 fiscal year. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | To approve an amendment and restatement of our 2006 Global Employee Stock Ownership Plan (to be renamed as our Employee Stock Purchase Plan), as previously amended and restated, including a request for 10,000,000 additional shares. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,453 | | | | 0 | | | 28-Apr-2022 | 28-Apr-2022 | |
| UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 911312106 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | UPS | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 05-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US9113121068 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935570487 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director to serve until 2023 annual meeting: Carol B. Tomé | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director to serve until 2023 annual meeting: Rodney C. Adkins | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director to serve until 2023 annual meeting: Eva C. Boratto | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director to serve until 2023 annual meeting: Michael J. Burns | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1E. | Election of Director to serve until 2023 annual meeting: Wayne M. Hewett | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director to serve until 2023 annual meeting: Angela Hwang | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director to serve until 2023 annual meeting: Kate E. Johnson | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director to serve until 2023 annual meeting: William R. Johnson | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F22 Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the leadership of the Chairman of the Board. |
| 1I. | Election of Director to serve until 2023 annual meeting: Ann M. Livermore | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director to serve until 2023 annual meeting: Franck J. Moison | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director to serve until 2023 annual meeting: Christiana Smith Shi | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1L. | Election of Director to serve until 2023 annual meeting: Russell Stokes | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1M. | Election of Director to serve until 2023 annual meeting: Kevin Warsh | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 2. | To approve on an advisory basis named executive officer compensation. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as UPS's independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | To prepare an annual report on lobbying activities. | | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that it is in the best interests of the Company and the stockholders to belong to industry associations and coalitions, where the Company benefits from the general business, technical, and industry standard-setting expertise these organizations provide. We furthermore believe that the proposal seeks unnecessary line-item disclosure of lobbying expenditures. We believe that the requested report is unnecessary and would require expenditures and the use of Company resources without providing any meaningful benefit to the shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 5. | To prepare a report on alignment of lobbying activities with the Paris Climate Agreement. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: However, we believe that the shareholder proposal is unnecessary and will not result in any additional benefit to the shareholders. Rather, the proposal promotes impractical and imprudent actions that would negatively affect the business and results. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 6. | To reduce the voting power of UPS class A stock from 10 votes per share to one vote per share. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that shareholder approval is warranted. We oppose such differential voting power as it may have the effect of denying shareholders the opportunity to vote on matters of critical economic importance to them. We prefer that companies do not utilize multiple class capital structures to provide equal voting rights to all shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 7. | To require adoption of independently verified science-based greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that setting clear-cut goals will help the Company reduce its regulatory risk related to GHG emissions, financial risk by decreasing volatility of energy prices, and overall expenditure on energy by implementing a disciplined business strategy to cut emissions from its operations. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 8. | To prepare a report on balancing climate measures and financial returns. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that transparency is important for evaluating risks and ensuring that investors and stakeholders have adequate information necessary to make informed decisions. Accordingly, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 9. | To prepare an annual report assessing UPS's diversity and inclusion. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval. We believe that the proposal would encourage good governance and enhance shareholder value by bringing together a diverse range of skills and experience necessary in building a constructive and challenging workforce. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 677 | | | | | 0 | | | 29-Apr-2022 | 29-Apr-2022 | |
| ECOLAB INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 278865100 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | ECL | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 05-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US2788651006 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935571263 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Shari L. Ballard | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Barbara J. Beck | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Christophe Beck | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Jeffrey M. Ettinger | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Arthur J. Higgins | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Michael Larson | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: David W. MacLennan | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Tracy B. McKibben | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Lionel L. Nowell, III | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Victoria J. Reich | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Suzanne M. Vautrinot | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1L. | Election of Director: John J. Zillmer | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 2. | Ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent registered public accounting firm for the current year ending December 31, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Advisory vote to approve the compensation of executives disclosed in the Proxy Statement. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | Stockholder proposal regarding special meeting ownership threshold, if properly presented. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of at least 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,255 | | | | 0 | | | 28-Apr-2022 | 28-Apr-2022 | |
| CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 127387108 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | CDNS | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 05-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US1273871087 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935575184 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Mark W. Adams | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Ita Brennan | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Lewis Chew | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Anirudh Devgan | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Mary Louise Krakauer | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Julia Liuson | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: James D. Plummer | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Alberto Sangiovanni- Vincentelli | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1I. | Election of Director: John B. Shoven | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Young K. Sohn | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Lip-Bu Tan | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Advisory resolution to approve named executive officer compensation. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of Cadence for its fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Stockholder proposal regarding special meetings. | | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 820 | | | | | 0 | | | 27-Apr-2022 | 27-Apr-2022 | |
| MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 571903202 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | MAR | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 06-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US5719032022 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935567199 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Anthony G.Capuano | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Isabella D. Goren | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Deborah M. Harrison | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Frederick A. Henderson | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Eric Hippeau | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Debra L. Lee | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Aylwin B. Lewis | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1H. | Election of Director: David S. Marriott | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F22 Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the leadership of the Chairman of the Board. |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Margaret M. McCarthy | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: George Muñoz | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Horacio D. Rozanski | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1L. | Election of Director: Susan C. Schwab | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 2. | RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG AS THE COMPANY'S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | APPROVAL OF THE MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5. | STOCKHOLDER RESOLUTION REQUESTING THAT THE BOARD PREPARE A REPORT ON THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COSTS AND RISKS CREATED BY THE COMPANY'S COMPENSATION AND WORKFORCE PRACTICES. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that a company's success depends upon its ability to embrace diversity and to draw upon the skills, expertise and experience of its workforce. As such, we believe that adoption of this proposal is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. In accordance with Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal |
| 6. | STOCKHOLDER RESOLUTION REGARDING AN INDEPENDENT BOARD CHAIR POLICY | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having an Inside director serve as the Chairman of the board. Consequently, we prefer that companies separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO and that the Chairman be independent to further ensure board independence and accountability. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 993 | | | | | 0 | | | 02-May-2022 | 02-May-2022 | |
| ABBVIE INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 00287Y109 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | ABBV | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 06-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US00287Y1091 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935568141 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1. | DIRECTOR | | | | | | | Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | 1 | | William H.L. Burnside | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 2 | | Thomas C. Freyman | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 3 | | Brett J. Hart | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 4 | | Edward J. Rapp | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as AbbVie's independent registered public accounting firm for 2022 | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Say on Pay - An advisory vote on the approval of executive compensation | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | Approval of a management proposal regarding amendment of the certificate of incorporation to eliminate supermajority voting | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5. | Stockholder Proposal - to Adopt a Policy to Require Independent Chairman | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having an Inside director serve as the Chairman of the board. Consequently, we prefer that companies separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO and that the Chairman be independent to further ensure board independence and accountability. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 6. | Stockholder Proposal - to Seek Shareholder Approval of Certain Termination Pay Arrangements | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the Company's compensation practices have been and will continue to be a key factor in the ability to deliver strong results. Furthermore, we believe that adopting the this proposal would put the Company at a competitive advantage in recruiting and retaining executive talent and that it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders for the independent Compensation Committee to retain the flexibility to design and administer competitive compensation program. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 7. | Stockholder Proposal - to Issue a Report on Board Oversight of Competition Practices | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: However, we believe that the shareholder proposal is unnecessary and will not result in any additional benefit to the shareholders. Rather, the proposal promotes impractical and imprudent actions that would negatively affect the business and results. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 8. | Stockholder Proposal - to Issue an Annual Report on Political Spending | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: In light of the Company's policies and oversight mechanisms related to its political contributions and activities, we believe that the shareholder proposal is unnecessary and will not result in any additional benefit to the shareholders. Rather, the proposal promotes impractical and imprudent actions that would negatively affect the business and results. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 3,256 | | | | 0 | | | 02-May-2022 | 02-May-2022 | |
| COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 194162103 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | CL | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 06-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US1941621039 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935571338 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1a. | Election of Director: John P. Bilbrey | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1b. | Election of Director: John T. Cahill | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1c. | Election of Director: Lisa M. Edwards | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1d. | Election of Director: C. Martin Harris | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1e. | Election of Director: Martina Hund-Mejean | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1f. | Election of Director: Kimberly A. Nelson | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1g. | Election of Director: Lorrie M. Norrington | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1h. | Election of Director: Michael B. Polk | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1i. | Election of Director: Stephen I. Sadove | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1j. | Election of Director: Noel R. Wallace | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Ratify selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Colgate's independent registered public accounting firm. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Advisory vote on executive compensation. | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Stockholder proposal regarding shareholder ratification of termination pay. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the Company's compensation practices have been and will continue to be a key factor in the ability to deliver strong results. Furthermore, we believe that adopting the this proposal would put the Company at a competitive advantage in recruiting and retaining executive talent and that it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders for the independent Compensation Committee to retain the flexibility to design and administer competitive compensation program. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 5. | Stockholder proposal regarding charitable donation disclosure. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: However, we believe that the shareholder proposal is unnecessary and will not result in any additional benefit to the shareholders. Rather, the proposal promotes impractical and imprudent actions that would negatively affect the business and results. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 628 | | | | | 0 | | | 02-May-2022 | 02-May-2022 | |
| CINCINNATI FINANCIAL CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 172062101 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | CINF | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 09-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US1720621010 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935572049 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Thomas J. Aaron | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: William F. Bahl | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Nancy C. Benacci | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Linda W. Clement- Holmes | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Dirk J. Debbink | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Steven J. Johnston | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Jill P. Meyer | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: David P. Osborn | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Gretchen W. Schar | | Management | For | | | For | �� | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Charles O. Schiff | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Douglas S. Skidmore | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1L. | Election of Director: John F. Steele, Jr. | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1M. | Election of Director: Larry R. Webb | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 2. | A nonbinding proposal to approve compensation for the company's named executive officers. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Ratification of the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the company's independent registered public accounting firm for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 604 | | | | | 0 | | | 02-May-2022 | 02-May-2022 | |
| 3M COMPANY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 88579Y101 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | MMM | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 10-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US88579Y1010 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935569535 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director for a one year term: Thomas "Tony" K. Brown | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director for a one year term: Pamela J. Craig | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1C. | Election of Director for a one year term: David B. Dillon | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director for a one year term: Michael L. Eskew | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1E. | Election of Director for a one year term: James R. Fitterling | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1F. | Election of Director for a one year term: Amy E. Hood | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1G. | Election of Director for a one year term: Muhtar Kent | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director for a one year term: Suzan Kereere | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director for a one year term: Dambisa F. Moyo | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director for a one year term: Gregory R. Page | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1K. | Election of Director for a one year term: Michael F. Roman | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as 3M's independent registered public accounting firm. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Advisory approval of executive compensation. | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Shareholder proposal on publishing a report on environmental costs. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: In light of the Company's policies and oversight mechanisms related to its environmental contributions and activities, we believe that the shareholder proposal is unnecessary and will not result in any additional benefit to the shareholders. Rather, the proposal promotes impractical and imprudent actions that would negatively affect the business and results. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 5. | Shareholder proposal on China audit. | | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that transparency is important for evaluating risks and ensuring that investors and stakeholders have adequate information necessary to make informed decisions. Accordingly, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,373 | | | | 0 | | | 04-May-2022 | 04-May-2022 | |
| DANAHER CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 235851102 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | DHR | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 10-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US2358511028 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935575057 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director to hold office until the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders: Rainer M. Blair | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director to hold office until the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders: Linda Filler | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director to hold office until the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders: Teri List | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director to hold office until the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders: Walter G. Lohr, Jr. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1E. | Election of Director to hold office until the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders: Jessica L. Mega, MD, MPH | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director to hold office until the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders: Mitchell P. Rales | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director to hold office until the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders: Steven M. Rales | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director to hold office until the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders: Pardis C. Sabeti, MD, D. PHIL | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director to hold office until the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders: A. Shane Sanders | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director to hold office until the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders: John T. Schwieters | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1K. | Election of Director to hold office until the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders: Alan G. Spoon | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1L. | Election of Director to hold office until the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders: Raymond C. Stevens, Ph.D | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1M. | Election of Director to hold office until the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders: Elias A. Zerhouni, MD | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | To ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as Danaher's independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | To approve on an advisory basis the Company's named executive officer compensation. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | To act upon a shareholder proposal requesting that Danaher amend its governing documents to reduce the percentage of shares required for shareholders to call a special meeting of shareholders from 25% to 10%. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 911 | | | | | 0 | | | 03-May-2022 | 03-May-2022 | |
| T. ROWE PRICE GROUP, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 74144T108 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | TROW | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 10-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US74144T1088 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935576871 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Glenn R. August | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Mark S. Bartlett | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Mary K. Bush | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Dina Dublon | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Dr. Freeman A. Hrabowski, III | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Robert F. MacLellan | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Eileen P. Rominger | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Robert W. Sharps | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Robert J. Stevens | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: William J. Stromberg | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Richard R. Verma | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1L. | Election of Director: Sandra S. Wijnberg | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1M. | Election of Director: Alan D. Wilson | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | To approve, by a non-binding advisory vote, the compensation paid by the Company to its Named Executive Officers. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,025 | | | | 0 | | | 03-May-2022 | 03-May-2022 | |
| IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 46284V101 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | IRM | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 10-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US46284V1017 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935578801 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director for a one year term: Jennifer Allerton | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director for a one year term: Pamela M. Arway | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director for a one year term: Clarke H. Bailey | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1D. | Election of Director for a one year term: Kent P. Dauten | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1E. | Election of Director for a one year term: Monte Ford | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director for a one year term: Robin L. Matlock | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director for a one year term: William L. Meaney | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director for a one year term: Wendy J. Murdock | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director for a one year term: Walter C. Rakowich | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director for a one year term: Doyle R. Simons | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director for a one year term: Alfred J. Verrecchia | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 2. | The approval of a non-binding, advisory resolution approving the compensation of our named executive officers as described in the Iron Mountain Incorporated Proxy Statement. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | The ratification of the selection by the Audit Committee of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Iron Mountain Incorporated's independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 3,508 | | | | 0 | | | 03-May-2022 | 03-May-2022 | |
| CONOCOPHILLIPS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 20825C104 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | COP | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 10-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US20825C1045 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935579168 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1a. | Election of Director: Caroline Maury Devine | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1b. | Election of Director: Jody Freeman | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1c. | Election of Director: Gay Huey Evans | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1d. | Election of Director: Jeffrey A. Joerres | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1e. | Election of Director: Ryan M. Lance | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1f. | Election of Director: Timothy A. Leach | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1g. | Election of Director: William H. McRaven | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1h. | Election of Director: Sharmila Mulligan | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1i. | Election of Director: Eric D. Mullins | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1j. | Election of Director: Arjun N. Murti | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1k. | Election of Director: Robert A. Niblock | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1l. | Election of Director: David T. Seaton | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1m. | Election of Director: R.A. Walker | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Proposal to ratify appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as ConocoPhillips' independent registered public accounting firm for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Advisory Approval of Executive Compensation. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | Adoption of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to Eliminate Supermajority Voting Provisions. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5. | Advisory Vote on Right to Call Special Meeting. | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of at least 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. We recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 6. | Right to Call Special Meeting. | | | Management | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of at least 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 7. | Emissions Reduction Targets. | | | Management | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that setting clear-cut goals will help the Company reduce its regulatory risk related to GHG emissions, financial risk by decreasing volatility of energy prices, and overall expenditure on energy by implementing a disciplined business strategy to cut emissions from its operations. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 8. | Report on Lobbying Activities. | | | Management | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: In light of the Company's policies and oversight mechanisms related to its political contributions and activities, we believe that the shareholder proposal is unnecessary and will not result in any additional benefit to the shareholders. Rather, the proposal promotes impractical and imprudent actions that would negatively affect the business and results. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 3,250 | | | | 0 | | | 05-May-2022 | 05-May-2022 | |
| EVEREST RE GROUP, LTD. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | G3223R108 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | RE | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 10-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | BMG3223R1088 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935601004 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1.1 | Election of Director for a term to end in 2023: John J. Amore | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1.2 | Election of Director for a term to end in 2023: Juan C. Andrade | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1.3 | Election of Director for a term to end in 2023: William F. Galtney, Jr. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1.4 | Election of Director for a term to end in 2023: John A. Graf | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1.5 | Election of Director for a term to end in 2023: Meryl Hartzband | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1.6 | Election of Director for a term to end in 2023: Gerri Losquadro | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1.7 | Election of Director for a term to end in 2023: Roger M. Singer | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1.8 | Election of Director for a term to end in 2023: Joseph V. Taranto | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1.9 | Election of Director for a term to end in 2023: John A. Weber | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention |
| | | Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 2. | For the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm to act as the Company's independent auditor for 2022 and authorize the Company's Board of Directors acting through its Audit Committee to determine the independent auditor's remuneration. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | For the approval, by non-binding advisory vote, of the 2021 compensation paid to the Company's Named Executive Officers. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 336 | | | | | 0 | | | 02-May-2022 | 02-May-2022 | |
| SKYWORKS SOLUTIONS, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 83088M102 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | SWKS | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 11-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US83088M1027 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935574271 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Alan S. Batey | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F21 Combined CEO and Board Chair Positions and the Company Earns a Board Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having the CEO or former CEO serve as the Chairman of the Board. Consequently, we prefer that companies focus on the following areas to improve its corporate governance practices: separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO, hold annual director elections, have one class of voting stock only, have key board committees consisting of independent directors and majority of independent directors on board and include non-binding compensation vote on agenda to further ensure board independence and accountability. |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Kevin L. Beebe | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Liam K. Griffin | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Eric J. Guerin | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Christine King | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Suzanne E. McBride | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: David P.McGlade | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention |
| | | Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Robert A. Schriesheim | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 2. | To ratify the selection by the Company's Audit Committee of KPMG LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Company for fiscal year 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company's named executive officers, as described in the Company's Proxy Statement. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | To approve an amendment to the Company's Restated Certificate of Incorporation to eliminate the supermajority vote provisions relating to stockholder approval of a merger or consolidation, disposition of all or substantially all of the Company's assets, or issuance of a substantial amount of the Company's securities. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5. | To approve an amendment to the Company's Restated Certificate of Incorporation to eliminate the supermajority vote provisions relating to stockholder approval of a business combination with any related person. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 6. | To approve an amendment to the Company's Restated Certificate of Incorporation to eliminate the supermajority vote provision relating to stockholder amendment of charter provisions governing directors. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 7. | To approve an amendment to the Company's Restated Certificate of Incorporation to eliminate the supermajority vote provision relating to stockholder amendment of the charter provision governing action by stockholders. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 8. | To approve a stockholder proposal regarding the Company's stockholder special meeting right. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of at least 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 229 | | | | | 0 | | | 05-May-2022 | 05-May-2022 | |
| AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 026874784 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | AIG | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 11-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US0268747849 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935574992 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: JAMES COLE, JR. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: W. DON CORNWELL | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: WILLIAM G. JURGENSEN | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: LINDA A. MILLS | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: THOMAS F. MOTAMED | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: PETER R. PORRINO | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: JOHN G. RICE | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: DOUGLAS M. STEENLAND | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: THERESE M. VAUGHAN | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: PETER ZAFFINO | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Approve, on an advisory basis, the 2021 compensation of AIG's named executives. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to serve as AIG's independent registered public accounting firm for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Some Concerns and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Shareholder proposal to reduce the threshold to call special meetings from 25 percent to 10 percent. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of at least 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 2,086 | | | | 0 | | | 05-May-2022 | 05-May-2022 | |
| CVS HEALTH CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 126650100 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | CVS | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 11-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US1266501006 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935576972 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Fernando Aguirre | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: C. David Brown II | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Alecia A. DeCoudreaux | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Nancy-Ann M. DeParle | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Roger N. Farah | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Anne M. Finucane | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Edward J. Ludwig | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Karen S. Lynch | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Jean-Pierre Millon | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Mary L. Schapiro | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: William C. Weldon | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Say on Pay, a proposal to approve, on an advisory basis, the Company's executive compensation. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | Stockholder proposal for reducing our ownership threshold to request a special stockholder meeting. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of at least 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 5. | Stockholder proposal regarding our independent Board Chair. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having an Inside director serve as the Chairman of the board. Consequently, we prefer that companies separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO and that the Chairman be independent to further ensure board independence and accountability. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 6. | Stockholder proposal on civil rights and non-discrimination audit focused on "non- diverse" employees. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that a company's success depends upon its ability to embrace diversity and to draw upon the skills, expertise and experience of its workforce. As such, we believe that adoption of this proposal is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. As such, in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 7. | Stockholder proposal requesting paid sick leave for all employees. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the approval of this proposal would result in the Company incurring unnecessary costs and expenses by duplicating efforts that are already underway and providing additional reports with information that is already available to shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 8. | Stockholder proposal regarding a report on the public health costs of our food business to diversified portfolios. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the approval of this proposal would result in the Company incurring unnecessary costs and expenses by duplicating efforts that are already underway and providing additional reports with information that is already available to shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,554 | | | | 0 | | | 05-May-2022 | 05-May-2022 | |
| AMERICAN WATER WORKS COMPANY, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 030420103 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | AWK | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 11-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US0304201033 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935578700 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Jeffrey N. Edwards | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Martha Clark Goss | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: M. Susan Hardwick | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Kimberly J. Harris | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Julia L. Johnson | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Patricia L. Kampling | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Karl F. Kurz | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: George MacKenzie | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1I. | Election of Director: James G. Stavridis | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the Company's named executive officers. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Ratification of the appointment, by the Audit, Finance and Risk Committee of the Board of Directors, of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Shareholder proposal on Climate Transition Plan Reporting as described in the proxy statement. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that improved transparency and accountability will enhance the Company's commitment to long-term sustainability. In accordance with Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 5. | Shareholder proposal on Racial Justice Audit as described in the proxy statement. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 811 | | | | | 0 | | | 08-May-2022 | 08-May-2022 | |
| IDEXX LABORATORIES, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 45168D104 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | IDXX | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 11-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US45168D1046 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935579079 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director (Proposal One): Jonathan W. Ayers | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director (Proposal One): Stuart M. Essig, PhD | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director (Proposal One): Jonathan J. Mazelsky | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director (Proposal One): M. Anne Szostak | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. To ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the current fiscal year (Proposal Two). | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation. To approve a nonbinding advisory resolution on the Company's executive compensation (Proposal Three). | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 196 | | | | | 0 | | | 04-May-2022 | 04-May-2022 | |
| DOMINION ENERGY, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 25746U109 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | D | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 11-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US25746U1097 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935579269 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: James A. Bennett | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Robert M. Blue | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Helen E. Dragas | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: James O. Ellis, Jr. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: D. Maybank Hagood | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Ronald W. Jibson | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Mark J. Kington | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Joseph M. Rigby | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Pamela J. Royal, M.D. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Robert H. Spilman, Jr. | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Susan N. Story | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1L. | Election of Director: Michael E. Szymanczyk | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 2. | Advisory Vote on Approval of Executive Compensation (Say on Pay) | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditor | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Management Proposal to Amend the Company's Bylaw on Shareholders' Right to Call a Special Meeting to Lower the Ownership Requirement to 15% | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of at least 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. We recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 5. | Shareholder Proposal Regarding the Shareholders' Right to Call a Special Meeting, Requesting the Ownership Threshold be Lowered to 10% | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of at least 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 6. | Shareholder Proposal Regarding Inclusion of Medium-Term Scope 3 Targets to the Company's Net Zero Goal | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that setting clear-cut goals will help the Company reduce its regulatory risk related to GHG emissions, financial risk by decreasing volatility of energy prices, and overall expenditure on energy by implementing a disciplined business strategy to cut emissions from its operations. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 7. | Shareholder Proposal Regarding a Report on the Risk of Natural Gas Stranded Assets | Shareholder | For | | | None | | | | | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 2,129 | | | | 0 | | | 05-May-2022 | 05-May-2022 | |
| FORD MOTOR COMPANY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 345370860 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | F | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 12-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US3453708600 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935571681 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Kimberly A. Casiano | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Alexandra Ford English | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: James D. Farley, Jr. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Henry Ford III | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: William Clay Ford, Jr. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: William W. Helman IV | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Jon M. Huntsman, Jr. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: William E. Kennard | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: John C. May | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Beth E. Mooney | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Lynn Vojvodich Radakovich | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1L. | Election of Director: John L. Thornton | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1M. | Election of Director: John B. Veihmeyer | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1N. | Election of Director: John S. Weinberg | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Say-on-Pay - An Advisory Vote to Approve the Compensation of the Named Executives. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | Approval of the Tax Benefit Preservation Plan. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5. | Relating to Consideration of a Recapitalization Plan to Provide That All of the Company's Outstanding Stock Have One Vote Per Share. | Management | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that shareholder approval is warranted. We oppose such differential voting power as it may have the effect of denying shareholders the opportunity to vote on matters of critical economic importance to them. We prefer that companies do not utilize multiple class capital structures to provide equal voting rights to all shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 2,540 | | | | 0 | | | 08-May-2022 | 08-May-2022 | |
| BATH & BODY WORKS INC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 070830104 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | BBWI | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 12-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US0708301041 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935575134 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Patricia S. Bellinger | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Alessandro Bogliolo | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Francis A. Hondal | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Danielle M. Lee | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Michael G. Morris | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Sarah E. Nash | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Juan Rajlin | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Stephen D. Steinour | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: J.K. Symancyk | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Ratification of the appointment of independent registered public accountants. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | Approval of the Bath & Body Works, Inc. Associate Stock Purchase Plan. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5. | Stockholder proposal to reduce the ownership threshold for calling special meetings of stockholders. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of at least 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 536 | | | | | 0 | | | 09-May-2022 | 09-May-2022 | |
| VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 92343V104 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | VZ | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 12-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US92343V1044 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935575704 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1a. | Election of Director: Shellye Archambeau | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1b. | Election of Director: Roxanne Austin | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1c. | Election of Director: Mark Bertolini | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1d. | Election of Director: Melanie Healey | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1e. | Election of Director: Laxman Narasimhan | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1f. | Election of Director: Clarence Otis, Jr. | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1g. | Election of Director: Daniel Schulman | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1h. | Election of Director: Rodney Slater | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1i. | Election of Director: Carol Tomé | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1j. | Election of Director: Hans Vestberg | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F22 Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Rating of Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Rating. We believe that cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the leadership of the Chairman of the Board. |
| 1k. | Election of Director: Gregory Weaver | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Advisory vote to approve executive compensation | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Ratification of appointment of independent registered public accounting firm | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Report on charitable contributions | | | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the proposal is not necessary and is not in the best long-term interest of the Company and its shareholders. As such, in accordance with Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 5. | Amend clawback policy | | | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The determination as to whether clawback policies are satisfactory should be made by the Company in a manner consistent with its disclosure policies and procedures. We believe that the Company's existing policy strikes an appropriate balance and establishes appropriate standards for recoupment of incentive compensation while providing sufficient detail to appropriately inform and motivate employees. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 6. | Shareholder ratification of annual equity awards | | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the Company's compensation practices have been and will continue to be a key factor in the ability to deliver strong results. Furthermore, we believe that adopting the this proposal would put the Company at a competitive advantage in recruiting and retaining executive talent and that it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders for the independent Compensation Committee to retain the flexibility to design and administer competitive compensation program. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 7. | Business operations in China | | | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval. Here, we find that approval of the proposal will provide the transparency shareholders need to evaluate such activities. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 184 | | | | | 0 | | | 10-May-2022 | 10-May-2022 | |
| 19-9867MS | | | | | SC ZIEGLER FAMCO FUND AND MS | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 5,170 | | | | 0 | | | 10-May-2022 | 10-May-2022 | |
| INTEL CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 458140100 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | INTC | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 12-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US4581401001 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935577013 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Patrick P. Gelsinger | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: James J. Goetz | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Andrea J. Goldsmith | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Alyssa H. Henry | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F19 Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Omar Ishrak | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F3 Over-Boarded (Board Chair) According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Chairman, being responsible for the leadership of the Board and the creation of the conditions necessary for overall board and individual director effectiveness, should hold no more than one other public directorship to ensure the valuable and prudent exercise of his/her fiduciary duties as a Chairman and that his/her integrity and efficiency are not compromised. F19 Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Risa Lavizzo-Mourey | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F19 Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Tsu-Jae King Liu | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Gregory D. Smith | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Dion J. Weisler | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F19 Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Frank D. Yeary | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 2. | Ratification of selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Advisory vote to approve executive compensation of our listed officers. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Approval of amendment and restatement of the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account the maximum amount of shareholder equity dilution this proposal could cause, as well as both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the passage of this plan as proposed by the board of directors. We recommend the board seek to align CEO pay more closely with the performance of the company and work to reduce the cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 5. | Stockholder proposal requesting amendment to the company's stockholder special meeting right, if properly presented at the meeting. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of at least 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 6. | Stockholder proposal requesting a third- party audit and report on whether written policies or unwritten norms at the company reinforce racism in company culture, if properly presented at the meeting. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 5,428 | | | | 0 | | | 08-May-2022 | 08-May-2022 | |
| SBA COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 78410G104 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | SBAC | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 12-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US78410G1040 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935579613 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1.1 | Election of Director for a three-year term expiring at the 2025 Annual Meeting: Kevin L. Beebe | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1.2 | Election of Director for a three-year term expiring at the 2025 Annual Meeting: Jack Langer | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1.3 | Election of Director for a three-year term expiring at the 2025 Annual Meeting: Jeffrey A. Stoops | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1.4 | Election of Director for a term expiring at the 2024 Annual Meeting: Jay L. Johnson | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as SBA's independent registered public accounting firm for the 2022 fiscal year. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of SBA's named executive officers. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 276 | | | | | 0 | | | 08-May-2022 | 08-May-2022 | |
| MASCO CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 574599106 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | MAS | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 12-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US5745991068 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935587189 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Donald R. Parfet | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Lisa A. Payne | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F22 Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the leadership of the Chairman of the Board. |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Reginald M. Turner | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 2. | To approve, by non-binding advisory vote, the compensation paid to the Company's named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and the related materials disclosed in the Proxy Statement. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | To ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent auditors for the Company for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 2,526 | | | | 0 | | | 05-May-2022 | 05-May-2022 | |
| WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 962166104 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | WY | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 13-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US9621661043 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935580527 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Mark A. Emmert | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Rick R. Holley | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Sara Grootwassink Lewis | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Deidra C. Merriwether | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Al Monaco | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Nicole W. Piasecki | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Lawrence A. Selzer | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Devin W. Stockfish | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Kim Williams | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the named executive officers. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Approval of the Weyerhaeuser 2022 Long- Term Incentive Plan. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | Ratification of the selection of independent registered public accounting firm for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 2,624 | | | | 0 | | | 06-May-2022 | 06-May-2022 | |
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 46625H100 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | JPM | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 17-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US46625H1005 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935580515 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1a. | Election of Director: Linda B. Bammann | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1b. | Election of Director: Stephen B. Burke | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1c. | Election of Director: Todd A. Combs | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1d. | Election of Director: James S. Crown | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1e. | Election of Director: James Dimon | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F21 Combined CEO and Board Chair Positions and the Company Earns a Board Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having the CEO or former CEO serve as the Chairman of the Board. Consequently, we prefer that companies focus on the following areas to improve its corporate governance practices: separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO, hold annual director elections, have one class of voting stock only, have key board committees consisting of independent directors and majority of independent directors on board and include non-binding compensation vote on agenda to further ensure board independence and accountability. |
| 1f. | Election of Director: Timothy P. Flynn | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1g. | Election of Director: Mellody Hobson | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1h. | Election of Director: Michael A. Neal | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1i. | Election of Director: Phebe N. Novakovic | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1j. | Election of Director: Virginia M. Rometty | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 2. | Advisory resolution to approve executive compensation | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Ratification of independent registered public accounting firm | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Fossil fuel financing | | | | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5. | Special shareholder meeting improvement | | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of at least 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 6. | Independent board chairman | | | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having an Inside director serve as the Chairman of the board. Consequently, we prefer that companies separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO and that the Chairman be independent to further ensure board independence and accountability. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 7. | Board diversity resolution | | | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval. We believe that the proposal would encourage good governance and enhance shareholder value by bringing together a diverse range of skills and experience necessary in building a constructive and challenging board. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 8. | Conversion to public benefit corporation | | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 9. | Report on setting absolute contraction targets | | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that setting clear-cut goals will help the Company reduce its regulatory risk related to GHG emissions, financial risk by decreasing volatility of energy prices, and overall expenditure on energy by implementing a disciplined business strategy to cut emissions from its operations. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 483 | | | | | 0 | | | 13-May-2022 | 13-May-2022 | |
| 19-9867MS | | | | | SC ZIEGLER FAMCO FUND AND MS | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 2,260 | | | | 0 | | | 13-May-2022 | 13-May-2022 | |
| PACKAGING CORPORATION OF AMERICA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 695156109 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | PKG | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 17-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US6951561090 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935582026 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Cheryl K. Beebe | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Duane C. Farrington | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Donna A. Harman | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Mark W. Kowlzan | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F21 Combined CEO and Board Chair Positions and the Company Earns a Board Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having the CEO or former CEO serve as the Chairman of the Board. Consequently, we prefer that companies focus on the following areas to improve its corporate governance practices: separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO, hold annual director elections, have one class of voting stock only, have key board committees consisting of independent directors and majority of independent directors on board and include non-binding compensation vote on agenda to further ensure board independence and accountability. |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Robert C. Lyons | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Thomas P. Maurer | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Samuel M. Mencoff | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Roger B. Porter | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Thomas S. Souleles | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Paul T. Stecko | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Proposal to ratify appointment of KPMG LLP as our auditors. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Proposal to approve our executive compensation. | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 179 | | | | | 0 | | | 10-May-2022 | 10-May-2022 | |
| MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 620076307 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | MSI | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 17-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US6200763075 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935583117 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director for a one year term: Gregory Q. Brown | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director for a one year term: Kenneth D. Denman | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F20 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1C. | Election of Director for a one year term: Egon P. Durban | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F1 Over-Boarded Director Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that a director should hold no more than five other public directorships to ensure the effective and prudent exercise of their fiduciary duties as directors. F20 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1D. | Election of Director for a one year term: Ayanna M. Howard | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director for a one year term: Clayton M. Jones | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director for a one year term: Judy C. Lewent | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director for a one year term: Gregory K. Mondre | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director for a one year term: Joseph M. Tucci | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F20 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 2. | Ratification of the Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company's Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Advisory Approval of the Company's Executive Compensation. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | Approval of the Motorola Solutions Amended and Restated Omnibus Incentive Plan of 2015. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account the maximum amount of shareholder equity dilution this proposal could cause, as well as both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the passage of this plan as proposed by the board of directors. We recommend the board seek to align CEO pay more closely with the performance of the company and work to reduce the cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 376 | | | | | 0 | | | 12-May-2022 | 12-May-2022 | |
| NIELSEN HOLDINGS PLC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | G6518L108 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | NLSN | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 17-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | GB00BWFY5505 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935583143 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: James A. Attwood, Jr. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Thomas H. Castro | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Guerrino De Luca | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Karen M. Hoguet | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: David Kenny | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Janice Marinelli Mazza | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Jonathan F. Miller | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Stephanie Plaines | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Nancy Tellem | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Lauren Zalaznick | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 2. | To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | To reappoint Ernst & Young LLP as our UK statutory auditor to audit our UK statutory annual accounts for the year ending December 31, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After, taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Resolution. |
| 4. | To authorize the Audit Committee to determine the compensation of our UK statutory auditor. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After, taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Resolution. |
| 5. | To approve on a non-binding, advisory basis the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy statement. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Resolution. |
| 6. | To approve on a non-binding, advisory basis the Directors' Compensation Report for the year ended December 31, 2021. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Resolution. |
| 7. | To authorize the Board of Directors to allot equity securities. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 8. | To authorize the Board of Directors to allot equity securities without rights of pre- emption. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 9. | To authorize the Board of Directors to allot equity securities without rights of pre- emption in connection with an acquisition or specified capital investment. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 10. | To approve of forms of share repurchase contracts and share repurchase counterparties. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We note, however, that in absence of the purpose of the proposed share repurchase, we believe that approval of the proposal could be detrimental to the interests of the shareholders and could unintentionally manipulate the Company's true value. As such, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 7,426 | | | | 0 | | | 10-May-2022 | 10-May-2022 | |
| FIRST REPUBLIC BANK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 33616C100 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | FRC | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 17-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US33616C1009 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935584892 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: James H. Herbert, II | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Katherine August- deWilde | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Frank J. Fahrenkopf, Jr. | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Boris Groysberg | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Sandra R. Hernández | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Pamela J. Joyner | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Shilla Kim-Parker | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Reynold Levy | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: George G.C. Parker | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Michael J. Roffler | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | To ratify KPMG LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of First Republic Bank for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | To approve the amendments to the First Republic Bank 2017 Omnibus Award Plan. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | To approve, by advisory (non-binding) vote, the compensation of our executive officers ("say on pay") vote. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 462 | | | | | 0 | | | 11-May-2022 | 11-May-2022 | |
| THE CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 808513105 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | SCHW | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 17-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US8085131055 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935587836 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: John K. Adams, Jr. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Stephen A. Ellis | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Brian M. Levitt | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Arun Sarin | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Charles R. Schwab | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Paula A. Sneed | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Approval of amendments to Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws to declassify the board of directors. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Ratification of the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as independent auditors. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5. | Approval of the 2022 Stock Incentive Plan. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 6. | Approval of the board's proposal to amend Bylaws to adopt proxy access. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 7. | Stockholder Proposal requesting amendment to Bylaws to adopt proxy access. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval. We believe that because the board of directors serves as the representatives of shareholders, shareholders should have the right to nominate their own representatives. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 8. | Stockholder Proposal requesting disclosure of lobbying policy, procedures and oversight; lobbying expenditures; and participation in organizations engaged in lobbying. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that it is in the best interests of the Company and the stockholders to belong to industry associations and coalitions, where the Company benefits from the general business, technical, and industry standard-setting expertise these organizations provide. We furthermore believe that the proposal seeks unnecessary line-item disclosure of lobbying expenditures. We believe that the requested report is unnecessary and would require expenditures and the use of Company resources without providing any meaningful benefit to the shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 2,472 | | | | 0 | | | 13-May-2022 | 13-May-2022 | |
| CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 169656105 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | CMG | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 18-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US1696561059 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935581149 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1. | DIRECTOR | | | | | | | Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | 1 | | Albert S. Baldocchi | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| | | | 2 | | Matthew A. Carey | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 3 | | Gregg Engles | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F20 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| | | | 4 | | Patricia Fili-Krushel | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F20 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| | | | 5 | | Mauricio Gutierrez | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F20 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| | | | 6 | | Robin Hickenlooper | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 7 | | Scott Maw | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 8 | | Brian Niccol | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F22 Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the leadership of the Chairman of the Board. |
| | | | 9 | | Mary Winston | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | An advisory vote to approve the compensation of our executive officers as disclosed in the proxy statement ("say-on- pay"). | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Approve the Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. 2022 Stock Incentive Plan. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account the maximum amount of shareholder equity dilution this proposal could cause, as well as both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the passage of this plan as proposed by the board of directors. We recommend the board seek to align CEO pay more closely with the performance of the company and work to reduce the cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 5. | Approve the Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 6. | Shareholder Proposal - Commission a Racial Equity Audit. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval. Here, we find that approval of the proposal will provide the transparency shareholders need to evaluate such activities. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 7. | Shareholder Proposal - Publish Quantitative Workforce Data. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval. Here, we find that approval of the proposal will provide the transparency shareholders need to evaluate diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 165 | | | | | 0 | | | 16-May-2022 | 16-May-2022 | |
| AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 03027X100 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | AMT | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 18-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US03027X1000 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935583080 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Thomas A. Bartlett | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Kelly C. Chambliss | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Teresa H. Clarke | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Raymond P. Dolan | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Kenneth R. Frank | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Robert D. Hormats | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Grace D. Lieblein | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Craig Macnab | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: JoAnn A. Reed | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Pamela D.A. Reeve | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F22 Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Rating of Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Rating. We believe that cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the leadership of the Chairman of the Board. |
| 1K. | Election of Director: David E. Sharbutt | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1L. | Election of Director: Bruce L. Tanner | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1M. | Election of Director: Samme L. Thompson | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | To ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | To approve, on an advisory basis, the Company's executive compensation. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 420 | | | | | 0 | | | 12-May-2022 | 12-May-2022 | |
| THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 883556102 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | TMO | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 18-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US8835561023 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935585058 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of director: Marc N. Casper | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of director: Nelson J. Chai | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of director: Ruby R. Chandy | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of director: C. Martin Harris | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of director: Tyler Jacks | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of director: R. Alexandra Keith | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of director: Jim P. Manzi | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1H. | Election of director: James C. Mullen | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of director: Lars R. Sorensen | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of director: Debora L. Spar | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of director: Scott M. Sperling | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1L. | Election of director: Dion J. Weisler | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | An advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Ratification of the Audit Committee's selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company's independent auditors for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 352 | | | | | 0 | | | 12-May-2022 | 12-May-2022 | |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 007903107 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | AMD | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 18-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US0079031078 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935585096 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: John E. Caldwell | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Nora M. Denzel | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Mark Durcan | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Michael P. Gregoire | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Joseph A. Householder | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: John W. Marren | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Jon A. Olson | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Lisa T. Su | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Abhi Y. Talwalkar | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Elizabeth W. Vanderslice | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the current fiscal year. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Advisory vote to approve the executive compensation of our named executive officers. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,990 | | | | 0 | | | 13-May-2022 | 13-May-2022 | |
| MONDELEZ INTERNATIONAL, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 609207105 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | MDLZ | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 18-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US6092071058 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935587379 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Lewis W.K. Booth | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Charles E. Bunch | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Ertharin Cousin | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Lois D. Juliber | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Jorge S. Mesquita | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Jane Hamilton Nielsen | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Christiana S. Shi | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Patrick T. Siewert | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Michael A. Todman | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Dirk Van de Put | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F21 Combined CEO and Board Chair Positions and the Company Earns a Board Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having the CEO or former CEO serve as the Chairman of the Board. Consequently, we prefer that companies focus on the following areas to improve its corporate governance practices: separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO, hold annual director elections, have one class of voting stock only, have key board committees consisting of independent directors and majority of independent directors on board and include non-binding compensation vote on agenda to further ensure board independence and accountability. |
| 2. | Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Independent Registered Public Accountants for Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Conduct and Publish Racial Equity Audit. | | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 5. | Require Independent Chair of the Board. | | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having an Inside director serve as the Chairman of the board. Consequently, we prefer that companies separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO and that the Chairman be independent to further ensure board independence and accountability. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,664 | | | | 0 | | | 13-May-2022 | 13-May-2022 | |
| VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 92532F100 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | VRTX | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 18-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US92532F1003 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935588042 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Sangeeta Bhatia | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Lloyd Carney | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F19 Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Alan Garber | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Terrence Kearney | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F19 Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Reshma Kewalramani | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Yuchun Lee | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F19 Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Jeffrey Leiden | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F22 Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the leadership of the Chairman of the Board. |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Margaret McGlynn | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Diana McKenzie | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Bruce Sachs | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F19 Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Suketu Upadhyay | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as independent Registered Public Accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Advisory vote to approve named executive office compensation. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Approval of an amendment and restatement of our 2013 Stock and Option Plan to increase the number of shares authorized for issuance under this plan by 13.5 million shares. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account the maximum amount of shareholder equity dilution this proposal could cause, as well as both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the passage of this plan as proposed by the board of directors. We recommend the board seek to align CEO pay more closely with the performance of the company and work to reduce the cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 129 | | | | | 0 | | | 13-May-2022 | 13-May-2022 | |
| ALIGN TECHNOLOGY, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 016255101 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | ALGN | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 18-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US0162551016 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935590136 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1a. | Election of Director: Kevin J. Dallas | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1b. | Election of Director: Joseph M. Hogan | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1c. | Election of Director: Joseph Lacob | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1d. | Election of Director: C. Raymond Larkin, Jr. | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1e. | Election of Director: George J. Morrow | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1f. | Election of Director: Anne M. Myong | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1g. | Election of Director: Andrea L. Saia | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1h. | Election of Director: Greg J. Santora | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1i. | Election of Director: Susan E. Siegel | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1j. | Election of Director: Warren S. Thaler | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 2. | RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS: Proposal to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Align Technology, Inc.'s independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | ADVISORY VOTE ON NAMED EXECUTIVES COMPENSATION: Consider an Advisory Vote to Approve the Compensation of our Named Executive Officers. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 125 | | | | | 0 | | | 16-May-2022 | 16-May-2022 | |
| HENRY SCHEIN, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 806407102 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | HSIC | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 18-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US8064071025 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935592306 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Mohamad Ali | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Stanley M. Bergman | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F21 Combined CEO and Board Chair Positions and the Company Earns a Board Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having the CEO or former CEO serve as the Chairman of the Board. Consequently, we prefer that companies focus on the following areas to improve its corporate governance practices: separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO, hold annual director elections, have one class of voting stock only, have key board committees consisting of independent directors and majority of independent directors on board and include non-binding compensation vote on agenda to further ensure board independence and accountability. |
| 1C. | Election of Director: James P. Breslawski | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Deborah Derby | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Joseph L. Herring | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Kurt P. Kuehn | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Philip A. Laskawy | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Anne H. Margulies | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Mark E. Mlotek | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Steven Paladino | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Carol Raphael | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1L. | Election of Director: E. Dianne Rekow, DDS, Ph.D. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1M. | Election of Director: Scott Serota | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1N. | Election of Director: Bradley T. Sheares, Ph.D. | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1O. | Election of Director: Reed V. Tuckson, M.D., FACP | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Proposal to approve, by non-binding vote, the 2021 compensation paid to the Company's Named Executive Officers. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Proposal to ratify the selection of BDO USA, LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,364 | | | | 0 | | | 12-May-2022 | 12-May-2022 | |
| NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | �� | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 666807102 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | NOC | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 18-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US6668071029 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935592495 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Kathy J. Warden | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: David P. Abney | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Marianne C. Brown | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Donald E. Felsinger | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Ann M. Fudge | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: William H. Hernandez | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Madeleine A. Kleiner | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Karl J. Krapek | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Graham N. Robinson | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Gary Roughead | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Thomas M. Schoewe | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1L. | Election of Director: James S. Turley | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1M. | Election of Director: Mark A. Welsh III | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Proposal to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company's Named Executive Officers. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Proposal to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company's Independent Auditor for fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Shareholder proposal to change the ownership threshold for shareholders to call a special meeting. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of at least 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 154 | | | | | 0 | | | 16-May-2022 | 16-May-2022 | |
| PINNACLE WEST CAPITAL CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 723484101 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | PNW | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 18-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US7234841010 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935593461 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1. | DIRECTOR | | | | | | | Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | 1 | | Glynis A. Bryan | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 2 | | G. A. de la Melena, Jr. | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 3 | | Richard P. Fox | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| | | | 4 | | Jeffrey B. Guldner | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F21 Combined CEO and Board Chair Positions and the Company Earns a Board Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having the CEO or former CEO serve as the Chairman of the Board. Consequently, we prefer that companies focus on the following areas to improve its corporate governance practices: separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO, hold annual director elections, have one class of voting stock only, have key board committees consisting of independent directors and majority of independent directors on board and include non-binding compensation vote on agenda to further ensure board independence and accountability. |
| | | | 5 | | Dale E. Klein, Ph.D. | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| | | | 6 | | Kathryn L. Munro | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| | | | 7 | | Bruce J. Nordstrom | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| | | | 8 | | Paula J. Sims | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 9 | | William H. Spence | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| | | | 10 | | James E. Trevathan, Jr. | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| | | | 11 | | David P. Wagener | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Advisory vote to approve executive compensation as disclosed in the 2022 Proxy Statement. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Ratify the appointment of the independent accountant for the year ending December 31, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Some Concerns and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | A shareholder proposal asking the Company to amend its governing documents to reduce the ownership threshold to 10% to call a special shareholder meeting, if properly presented at the meeting. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,804 | | | | 0 | | | 16-May-2022 | 16-May-2022 | |
| FISERV, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 337738108 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | FISV | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 18-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US3377381088 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935593788 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1. | DIRECTOR | | | | | | | Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | 1 | | Frank J. Bisignano | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 2 | | Alison Davis | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 3 | | Henrique de Castro | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 4 | | Harry F. DiSimone | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| | | | 5 | | Dylan G. Haggart | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 6 | | Wafaa Mamilli | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 7 | | Heidi G. Miller | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 8 | | Doyle R. Simons | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| | | | 9 | | Kevin M. Warren | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 2. | To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers of Fiserv, Inc. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of Fiserv, Inc. for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Shareholder proposal requesting the board seek shareholder approval of senior manager severance and termination payments. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the Company's compensation practices have been and will continue to be a key factor in the ability to deliver strong results. Furthermore, we believe that adopting the this proposal would put the Company at a competitive advantage in recruiting and retaining executive talent and that it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders for the independent Compensation Committee to retain the flexibility to design and administer competitive compensation program. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 878 | | | | | 0 | | | 16-May-2022 | 16-May-2022 | |
| ROSS STORES, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 778296103 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | ROST | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 18-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US7782961038 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935593853 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A) | Election of Director: K. Gunnar Bjorklund | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1B) | Election of Director: Michael J. Bush | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1C) | Election of Director: Sharon D. Garrett | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D) | Election of Director: Michael J. Hartshorn | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E) | Election of Director: Stephen D. Milligan | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F) | Election of Director: Patricia H. Mueller | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1G) | Election of Director: George P. Orban | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H) | Election of Director: Larree M. Renda | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I) | Election of Director: Barbara Rentler | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J) | Election of Director: Doniel N. Sutton | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 2) | Advisory vote to approve the resolution on the compensation of the named executive officers. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3) | To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending January 28, 2023. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 622 | | | | | 0 | | | 12-May-2022 | 12-May-2022 | |
| QUEST DIAGNOSTICS INCORPORATED | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 74834L100 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | DGX | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 18-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US74834L1008 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935621107 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1.1 | Election of Director: Tracey C. Doi | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1.2 | Election of Director: Vicky B. Gregg | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1.3 | Election of Director: Wright L. Lassiter III | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1.4 | Election of Director: Timothy L. Main | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1.5 | Election of Director: Denise M. Morrison | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1.6 | Election of Director: Gary M. Pfeiffer | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1.7 | Election of Director: Timothy M. Ring | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1.8 | Election of Director: Stephen H. Rusckowski | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F22 Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the leadership of the Chairman of the Board. |
| 1.9 | Election of Director: Gail R. Wilensky | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | An advisory resolution to approve the executive officer compensation disclosed in the Company's 2022 proxy statement | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm for 2022 | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | To adopt an amendment to the Company's Certificate of Incorporation to allow stockholders to act by non-unanimous written consent | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5. | To adopt an amendment to the Company's Certificate of Incorporation to permit stockholders holding 15% or more of the Company's common stock to request that the Company call a special meeting of stockholders | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of at least 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. We recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 6. | Stockholder proposal regarding the right to call a special meeting of stockholders | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of at least 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 755 | | | | | 0 | | | 16-May-2022 | 16-May-2022 | |
| AT&T INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 00206R102 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | T | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 19-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US00206R1023 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935579409 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Samuel A. Di Piazza, Jr. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Scott T. Ford | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Glenn H. Hutchins | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: William E. Kennard | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F3 Over-Boarded (Board Chair) According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Chairman, being responsible for the leadership of the Board and the creation of the conditions necessary for overall board and individual director effectiveness, should hold no more than one other public directorship to ensure the valuable and prudent exercise of his/her fiduciary duties as a Chairman and that his/her integrity and efficiency are not compromised. F22 Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the leadership of the Chairman of the Board. |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Debra L. Lee | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Stephen J. Luczo | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Michael B. McCallister | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Beth E. Mooney | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Matthew K. Rose | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1J. | Election of Director: John T. Stankey | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Cynthia B. Taylor | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1L. | Election of Director: Luis A. Ubiñas | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1M. | Election of Director: Geoffrey Y. Yang | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 2. | Ratification of the appointment of independent auditors | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Advisory approval of executive compensation | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Improve executive compensation program | | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that pay ratio is material to shareholders as this would provide a valuable additional metric for evaluating and voting on executive compensation practices and Say-on-Pay proxy proposals. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 5. | Independent board chairman | | | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having an Inside director serve as the Chairman of the board. Consequently, we prefer that companies separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO and that the Chairman be independent to further ensure board independence and accountability. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 6. | Political congruency report | | | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: In light of the Company's policies and oversight mechanisms related to its political contributions and activities, we believe that the shareholder proposal is unnecessary and will not result in any additional benefit to the shareholders. Rather, the proposal promotes impractical and imprudent actions that would negatively affect the business and results. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 7. | Civil rights and non-discrimination audit | | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval. Here, we find that approval of the proposal will provide the transparency shareholders need to evaluate such activities. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 10,745 | | | | 0 | | | 16-May-2022 | 16-May-2022 | |
| CROWN CASTLE INTERNATIONAL CORP. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 22822V101 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | CCI | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 19-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US22822V1017 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935580793 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: P. Robert Bartolo | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Jay A. Brown | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Cindy Christy | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Ari Q. Fitzgerald | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Andrea J. Goldsmith | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Tammy K. Jones | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Anthony J. Melone | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: W. Benjamin Moreland | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Kevin A. Stephens | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Matthew Thornton, III | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | The ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company's independent registered public accountants for fiscal year 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | The proposal to approve the Company's 2022 Long-Term Incentive Plan. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | The amendment to the Company's Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5. | The non-binding, advisory vote to approve the compensation of the Company's named executive officers. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,111 | | | | 0 | | | 17-May-2022 | 17-May-2022 | |
| THE HOME DEPOT, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 437076102 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | HD | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 19-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US4370761029 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935581290 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Gerard J. Arpey | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Ari Bousbib | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Jeffery H. Boyd | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Gregory D. Brenneman | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: J. Frank Brown | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Albert P. Carey | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Edward P. Decker | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Linda R. Gooden | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Wayne M. Hewett | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Manuel Kadre | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Stephanie C. Linnartz | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1L. | Election of Director: Craig A. Menear | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1M. | Election of Director: Paula Santilli | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1N. | Election of Director: Caryn Seidman-Becker | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Ratification of the Appointment of KPMG LLP | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation ("Say-on-Pay") | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | Approval of the Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated May 19, 2022 | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5. | Shareholder Proposal to Reduce the Threshold to Call Special Shareholder Meetings to 10% of Outstanding Shares | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of at least 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal |
| 6. | Shareholder Proposal Regarding Independent Board Chair | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having an Inside director serve as the Chairman of the board. Consequently, we prefer that companies separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO and that the Chairman be independent to further ensure board independence and accountability. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 7. | Shareholder Proposal Regarding Political Contributions Congruency Analysis | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 8. | Shareholder Proposal Regarding Report on Gender and Racial Equity on the Board of Directors | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval. We believe that the proposal would encourage good governance and enhance shareholder value by bringing together a diverse range of skills and experience necessary in building a constructive and challenging board. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 9. | Shareholder Proposal Regarding Report on Deforestation | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that failure to adopt and implement policies that mitigate risk exposures to deforestation and the degradation of primary forests in its supply chains may subject the company to significant systemic and company-specific risks. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 10. | Shareholder Proposal Regarding Racial Equity Audit | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval. Here, we find that approval of the proposal will provide the transparency shareholders need to evaluate such activities. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 188 | | | | | 0 | | | 17-May-2022 | 17-May-2022 | |
| 19-9867MS | | | | | SC ZIEGLER FAMCO FUND AND MS | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,000 | | | | 0 | | | 17-May-2022 | 17-May-2022 | |
| NEXTERA ENERGY, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 65339F101 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | NEE | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 19-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US65339F1012 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935583092 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Sherry S. Barrat | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: James L. Camaren | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Kenneth B. Dunn | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Naren K. Gursahaney | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Kirk S. Hachigian | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: John W. Ketchum | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Amy B. Lane | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: David L. Porges | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: James L. Robo | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F22 Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the leadership of the Chairman of the Board. |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Rudy E. Schupp | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1K. | Election of Director: John L. Skolds | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1L. | Election of Director: John Arthur Stall | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1M. | Election of Director: Darryl L. Wilson | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Ratification of appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as NextEra Energy's independent registered public accounting firm for 2022 | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Approval, by non-binding advisory vote, of NextEra Energy's compensation of its named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy statement | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | A proposal entitled "Board Matrix" to request disclosure of a Board skills matrix | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval. We believe that the proposal would encourage good governance and enhance shareholder value by bringing together a diverse range of skills and experience necessary in building a constructive and challenging board. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 5. | A proposal entitled "Diversity Data Reporting" to request quantitative employee diversity data | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval. We believe that the proposal would encourage good governance and enhance shareholder value by bringing together a diverse range of skills and experience necessary in building a constructive and challenging workforce. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 3,268 | | | | 0 | | | 17-May-2022 | 17-May-2022 | |
| CHUBB LIMITED | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | H1467J104 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | CB | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 19-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | CH0044328745 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935586101 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1 | Approval of the management report, standalone financial statements and consolidated financial statements of Chubb Limited for the year ended December 31, 2021 | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2A | Allocation of disposable profit | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2B | Distribution of a dividend out of legal reserves (by way of release and allocation to a dividend reserve) | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3 | Discharge of the Board of Directors | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4A | Election of PricewaterhouseCoopers AG (Zurich) as our statutory auditor | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4B | Ratification of appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (United States) as independent registered public accounting firm for purposes of U.S. securities law reporting | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4C | Election of BDO AG (Zurich) as special audit firm | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5A | Election of Director: Evan G. Greenberg | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Combined CEO and Board Chair positions and the Company earns a board score of Some Concerns Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having the CEO or former CEO serve as the Chairman of the Board. Consequently, we prefer that companies focus on the following areas to improve its corporate governance practices: separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO, hold annual director elections, have one class of voting stock only, have key board committees consisting of independent directors and majority of independent directors on board and include non-binding compensation vote on agenda to further ensure board independence and accountability. |
| 5B | Election of Director: Michael P. Connors | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliated Outside director serving as a member of the Compensation and Nominating Committees According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, with the exception of diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 5C | Election of Director: Michael G. Atieh | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5D | Election of Director: Kathy Bonanno | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5E | Election of Director: Sheila P. Burke | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5F | Election of Director: Mary Cirillo | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5G | Election of Director: Robert J. Hugin | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5H | Election of Director: Robert W. Scully | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5I | Election of Director: Theodore E. Shasta | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliated Outside director serving as a member of the Audit Committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, with the exception of diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 5J | Election of Director: David H. Sidwell | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5K | Election of Director: Olivier Steimer | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5L | Election of Director: Luis Téllez | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5M | Election of Director: Frances F. Townsend | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 6 | Election of Evan G. Greenberg as Chairman of the Board of Directors | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Combined CEO and Board Chair positions and the Company earns a board score of Some Concerns Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having the CEO or former CEO serve as the Chairman of the Board. Consequently, we prefer that companies focus on the following areas to improve its corporate governance practices: separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO, hold annual director elections, have one class of voting stock only, have key board committees consisting of independent directors and majority of independent directors on board and include non-binding compensation vote on agenda to further ensure board independence and accountability |
| 7A | Election of Director of the Compensation Committee: Michael P. Connors | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Affiliated Outside director serving as a member of the Compensation and Nominating Committees According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, with the exception of diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 7B | Election of Director of the Compensation Committee: Mary Cirillo | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 7C | Election of Director of the Compensation Committee: Frances F. Townsend | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 8 | Election of Homburger AG as independent proxy | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 9 | Amendment to the Articles of Association relating to authorized share capital for general purposes | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 10 | Reduction of share capital | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 11A | Compensation of the Board of Directors until the next annual general meeting | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 11B | Compensation of Executive Management for the next calendar year | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 12 | Advisory vote to approve executive compensation under U.S. securities law requirements | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 13 | Shareholder proposal regarding a policy restricting underwriting of new fossil fuel supplies | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We do not believe that the expenditure of the additional human and financial resources that would be required to adopt this proposal would be a necessary or prudent use of Company and shareholder assets. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan- Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 14 | Shareholder proposal regarding a report on greenhouse gas emissions | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Acknowledging climate change as an inevitable factor, and recognizing the need to adapt, involves bold decisions by business. Therefore, we believe that companies should review how climate change impacts the economy and portfolio companies and evaluate how shareholder resolutions on climate change may impact long-term shareholder value as it votes proxies. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| A | If a new agenda item or a new proposal for an existing agenda item is put before the meeting, I/we hereby authorize and instruct the independent proxy to vote as follows. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We do not recommend that shareholders approve in advance matters of which they have no knowledge. Accordingly, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 996 | | | | | 0 | | | 16-May-2022 | 16-May-2022 | |
| SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 87165B103 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | SYF | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 19-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US87165B1035 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935586935 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Margaret M. Keane | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Fernando Aguirre | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Paget L. Alves | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Kamila Chytil | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Arthur W. Coviello, Jr. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Brian D. Doubles | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: William W. Graylin | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Roy A. Guthrie | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Jeffrey G. Naylor | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Bill Parker | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Laurel J. Richie | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1L. | Election of Director: Ellen M. Zane | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Ratification of Selection of KPMG LLP as Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm of the Company for 2022 | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 932 | | | | | 0 | | | 16-May-2022 | 16-May-2022 | |
| OTIS WORLDWIDE CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 68902V107 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | OTIS | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 19-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US68902V1070 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935586973 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Jeffrey H. Black | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Kathy Hopinkah Hannan | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Shailesh G. Jejurikar | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Christopher J. Kearney | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Judith F. Marks | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Harold W. McGraw III | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Margaret M. V. Preston | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Shelley Stewart, Jr. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: John H. Walker | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Appoint PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to Serve as Independent Auditor for 2022. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | Shareholder Proposal to eliminate the one- year ownership requirement to call a special shareholders meeting, if properly presented. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of at least 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 514 | | | | | 0 | | | 17-May-2022 | 17-May-2022 | |
| ALTRIA GROUP, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 02209S103 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | MO | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 19-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US02209S1033 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935588472 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Ian L.T. Clarke | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Marjorie M. Connelly | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: R. Matt Davis | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: William F. Gifford, Jr. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Debra J. Kelly-Ennis | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: W. Leo Kiely III | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Kathryn B. McQuade | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: George Muñoz | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Nabil Y. Sakkab | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Virginia E. Shanks | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Ellen R. Strahlman | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1L. | Election of Director: M. Max Yzaguirre | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Ratification of the Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Non-Binding Advisory Vote to Approve the Compensation of Altria's Named Executive Officers. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | Shareholder Proposal - Commission a Civil Rights Equity Audit. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval. Here, we find that approval of the proposal will provide the transparency shareholders need to evaluate such activities. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 2,912 | | | | 0 | | | 16-May-2022 | 16-May-2022 | |
| DEXCOM, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 252131107 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | DXCM | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 19-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US2521311074 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935593651 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1.1 | Election of Class II Director to hold office until our 2023 Annual Meeting: Steven R. Altman | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1.2 | Election of Class II Director to hold office until our 2023 Annual Meeting: Barbara E. Kahn | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1.3 | Election of Class II Director to hold office until our 2023 Annual Meeting: Kyle Malady | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1.4 | Election of Class II Director to hold office until our 2023 Annual Meeting: Jay S. Skyler, MD, MACP | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 2. | To ratify the selection by the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | To hold a non-binding vote on an advisory resolution to approve executive compensation. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | To approve the amendment and restatement of our Restated Certificate of Incorporation to (i) effect a 4:1 forward split of our Common Stock (the "Forward Stock Split") and (ii) increase the number of shares of authorized Common Stock to effectuate the Forward Stock Split. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 188 | | | | | 0 | | | 17-May-2022 | 17-May-2022 | |
| TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 874054109 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Special | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | TTWO | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 19-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US8740541094 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935610988 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1. | Approval of the issuance of shares of Take- Two common stock in connection with the combination contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated January 9, 2022, among Take-Two, Zebra MS I, Inc., Zebra MS II, Inc. and Zynga, as the same may be amended from time to time. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Approval and adoption of an amendment to the Company's Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of Company capital stock from 205,000,000 to 305,000,000, of which 300,000,000 shares will be common stock and 5,000,000 shares will be preferred stock. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Approval of the adjournment of the Company's special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the time of the Company's special meeting to approve proposals 1 and 2. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 433 | | | | | 0 | | | 17-May-2022 | 17-May-2022 | |
| HILTON WORLDWIDE HOLDINGS INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 43300A203 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | HLT | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 20-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US43300A2033 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935591304 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Christopher J. Nassetta | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Jonathan D. Gray | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Charlene T. Begley | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Chris Carr | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Melanie L. Healey | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Raymond E. Mabus, Jr. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Judith A. McHale | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Elizabeth A. Smith | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Douglas M. Steenland | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention |
| | | Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor rating and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 2. | Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Approval, in a non-binding advisory vote, of the compensation paid to the Company's named executive officers. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,353 | | | | 0 | | | 17-May-2022 | 17-May-2022 | |
| MERCK & CO., INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 58933Y105 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | MRK | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 24-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US58933Y1055 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935591570 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Douglas M. Baker, Jr. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Mary Ellen Coe | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Pamela J. Craig | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Robert M. Davis | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Kenneth C. Frazier | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Thomas H. Glocer | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Risa J. Lavizzo- Mourey, M.D. | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Stephen L. Mayo, Ph.D. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Paul B. Rothman, M.D. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Patricia F. Russo | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Christine E. Seidman, M.D. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1L. | Election of Director: Inge G. Thulin | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1M. | Election of Director: Kathy J. Warden | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1N. | Election of Director: Peter C. Wendell | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 2. | Non-binding advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Ratification of the appointment of the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Shareholder proposal regarding an independent board chairman. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having an Inside director serve as the Chairman of the board. Consequently, we prefer that companies separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO and that the Chairman be independent to further ensure board independence and accountability. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 5. | Shareholder proposal regarding access to COVID-19 products. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the approval of this shareholder proposal is not advisable and is not in the best interests of the shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 6. | Shareholder proposal regarding lobbying expenditure disclosure. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that it is in the best interests of the Company and the stockholders to belong to industry associations and coalitions, where the Company benefits from the general business, technical, and industry standard-setting expertise these organizations provide. We furthermore believe that the proposal seeks unnecessary line-item disclosure of lobbying expenditures. We believe that the requested report is unnecessary and would require expenditures and the use of Company resources without providing any meaningful benefit to the shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 2,775 | | | | 0 | | | 18-May-2022 | 18-May-2022 | |
| PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 723787107 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | PXD | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 25-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US7237871071 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935593500 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: A.R. Alameddine | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Lori G. Billingsley | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Edison C. Buchanan | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Maria S. Dreyfus | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Matthew M. Gallagher | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Phillip A. Gobe | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Stacy P. Methvin | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Royce W. Mitchell | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Frank A. Risch | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Scott D. Sheffield | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: J. Kenneth Thompson | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F3 Over-Boarded (Board Chair) According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Chairman, being responsible for the leadership of the Board and the creation of the conditions necessary for overall board and individual director effectiveness, should hold no more than one other public directorship to ensure the valuable and prudent exercise of his/her fiduciary duties as a Chairman and that his/her integrity and efficiency are not compromised. F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1L. | Election of Director: Phoebe A. Wood | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS THE COMPANY'S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 235 | | | | | 0 | | | 23-May-2022 | 23-May-2022 | |
| FIDELITY NAT'L INFORMATION SERVICES,INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 31620M106 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | FIS | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 25-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US31620M1062 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935601042 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Ellen R. Alemany | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Vijay D'Silva | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Jeffrey A. Goldstein | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F19 Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Lisa A. Hook | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Keith W. Hughes | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F19 Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Kenneth T. Lamneck | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Gary L. Lauer | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F19 Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Gary A. Norcross | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Louise M. Parent | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Brian T. Shea | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: James B. Stallings, Jr. | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F19 Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1L. | Election of Director: Jeffrey E. Stiefler | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F19 Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 2. | Advisory vote on Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. executive compensation. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | To approve the Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. 2022 Omnibus Incentive Plan. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account the maximum amount of shareholder equity dilution this proposal could cause, as well as both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the passage of this plan as proposed by the board of directors. We recommend the board seek to align CEO pay more closely with the performance of the company and work to reduce the cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | To approve the Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5. | To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 946 | | | | | 0 | | | 24-May-2022 | 24-May-2022 | |
| META PLATFORMS, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 30303M102 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | FB | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 25-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US30303M1027 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935601559 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1. | DIRECTOR | | | | | | | Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | 1 | | Peggy Alford | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 2 | | Marc L. Andreessen | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| | | | 3 | | Andrew W. Houston | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 4 | | Nancy Killefer | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 5 | | Robert M. Kimmitt | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 6 | | Sheryl K. Sandberg | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 7 | | Tracey T. Travis | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 8 | | Tony Xu | | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 9 | | Mark Zuckerberg | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F21 Combined CEO and Board Chair Positions and the Company Earns a Board Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having the CEO or former CEO serve as the Chairman of the Board. Consequently, we prefer that companies focus on the following areas to improve its corporate governance practices: separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO, hold annual director elections, have one class of voting stock only, have key board committees consisting of independent directors and majority of independent directors on board and include non-binding compensation vote on agenda to further ensure board independence and accountability. F22 Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the leadership of the Chairman of the Board. |
| 2. | To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Meta Platforms, Inc.'s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | To approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation program for Meta Platforms, Inc.'s named executive officers as disclosed in Meta Platforms, Inc.'s proxy statement. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | A shareholder proposal regarding dual class capital structure. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5. | A shareholder proposal regarding an independent chair. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having an Inside director serve as the Chairman of the board. Consequently, we prefer that companies separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO and that the Chairman be independent to further ensure board independence and accountability. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 6. | A shareholder proposal regarding concealment clauses. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval. Here, we find that approval of the proposal will provide the transparency shareholders need to evaluate such activities. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 7. | A shareholder proposal regarding report on external costs of misinformation. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that approval of this proposal is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. We recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. | | |
| 8. | A shareholder proposal regarding report on community standards enforcement. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Given the Company's failure to mitigate the material risks of dangerous and criminal behavior, terrorist content, hate speech, and misinformation on its sites, we believe that approval of this proposal is in the best interests of the Company and its stakeholders. As such, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 9. | A shareholder proposal regarding report and advisory vote on the metaverse. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval. Here, we find that approval of the proposal will provide the transparency shareholders need to evaluate such activities. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 10. | A shareholder proposal regarding human rights impact assessment. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval. Here, we find that approval of the proposal will provide the transparency shareholders need to evaluate such activities. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 11. | A shareholder proposal regarding child sexual exploitation online. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that approval of the proposal will enable the Company to gather adequate information on the risks brought by the increasing sexual exploitation of children online, and therefore use such information in addressing the operational and reputational impacts not only within the Company, but also in the communities it serves. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 12. | A shareholder proposal regarding civil rights and non-discrimination audit. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that a company's success depends upon its ability to embrace diversity. As such, we believe that adoption of this proposal is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. As such, in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 13. | A shareholder proposal regarding report on lobbying. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 14. | A shareholder proposal regarding assessment of audit & risk oversight committee. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that human rights issues are needed to be escalated at the board level to ensure proper accountability and oversight. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 15. | A shareholder proposal regarding report on charitable donations. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 564 | | | | | 0 | | | 23-May-2022 | 23-May-2022 | |
| 19-9867MS | | | | | SC ZIEGLER FAMCO FUND AND MS | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,980 | | | | 0 | | | 23-May-2022 | 23-May-2022 | |
| THE TRAVELERS COMPANIES, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 89417E109 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | TRV | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 25-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US89417E1091 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935603490 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Alan L. Beller | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Janet M. Dolan | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Patricia L. Higgins | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: William J. Kane | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Thomas B. Leonardi | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Clarence Otis Jr. | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Elizabeth E. Robinson | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Philip T. Ruegger III | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Rafael Santana | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Todd C. Schermerhorn | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Alan D. Schnitzer | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1L. | Election of Director: Laurie J. Thomsen | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1M. | Election of Director: Bridget van Kralingen | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as The Travelers Companies, Inc.'s independent registered public accounting firm for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Non-binding vote to approve executive compensation. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Shareholder proposal relating to additional disclosure of lobbying, if presented at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5. | Shareholder proposal relating to the issuance of a report on GHG emissions, if presented at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that setting clear-cut goals will help the Company reduce its regulatory risk related to GHG emissions, financial risk by decreasing volatility of energy prices, and overall expenditure on energy by implementing a disciplined business strategy to cut emissions from its operations. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 6. | Shareholder proposal relating to policies regarding fossil fuel supplies, if presented at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 7. | Shareholder proposal relating to conducting a racial equity audit, if presented at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that a company's success depends upon its ability to embrace diversity. As such, we believe that adoption of this proposal is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. As such, in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 8. | Shareholder proposal relating to the issuance of a report on insuring law enforcement, if presented at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that transparency is important for evaluating risks and ensuring that investors and stakeholders have adequate information necessary to make informed decisions. Accordingly, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 768 | | | | | 0 | | | 23-May-2022 | 23-May-2022 | |
| CHEVRON CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 166764100 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | CVX | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 25-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US1667641005 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935603882 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Wanda M. Austin | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: John B. Frank | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Alice P. Gast | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Enrique Hernandez, Jr. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Marillyn A. Hewson | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Jon M. Huntsman Jr. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Charles W. Moorman | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Dambisa F. Moyo | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Debra Reed-Klages | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Ronald D. Sugar | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1K. | Election of Director: D. James Umpleby III | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1L. | Election of Director: Michael K. Wirth | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Ratification of Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | Approve the 2022 Long-Term Incentive Plan of Chevron Corporation | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5. | Adopt Medium- and Long-Term GHG Reduction Targets | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that setting clear-cut goals will help the Company reduce its regulatory risk related to GHG emissions, financial risk by decreasing volatility of energy prices, and overall expenditure on energy by implementing a disciplined business strategy to cut emissions from its operations. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 6. | Report on Impacts of Net Zero 2050 Scenario | | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that improved transparency and accountability will enhance the Company's commitment to long-term sustainability. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 7. | Report on Reliability of Methane Emission Disclosures | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 8. | Report on Business with Conflict-Complicit Governments | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that transparency is important for evaluating risks and ensuring that investors and stakeholders have adequate information necessary to make informed decisions. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 9. | Report on Racial Equity Audit | | | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that a company's success depends upon its ability to embrace diversity. As such, we believe that adoption of this proposal is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. As such, in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 10. | Special Meetings | | | | | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of at least 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 2,271 | | | | 0 | | | 23-May-2022 | 23-May-2022 | |
| EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 30231G102 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | XOM | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 25-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US30231G1022 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935604214 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Michael J. Angelakis | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Susan K. Avery | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Angela F. Braly | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Ursula M. Burns | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Gregory J. Goff | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Kaisa H. Hietala | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Joseph L. Hooley | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Steven A. Kandarian | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Alexander A. Karsner | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Jeffrey W. Ubben | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Darren W. Woods | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Ratification of Independent Auditors | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | Remove Executive Perquisites | | | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that it is the benefit of the Company to retain flexibility with respect to executive compensation, rather than commit to arbitrary principles which could place the Company at a competitive disadvantage in recruiting and retaining top talent. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 5. | Limit Shareholder Rights for Proposal Submission | | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: However, we believe that the shareholder proposal is unnecessary. Rather, the proposal promotes impractical and imprudent actions that would negatively affect the business and results. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 6. | Reduce Company Emissions and Hydrocarbon Sales | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that setting clear-cut goals will help the Company reduce its regulatory risk related to GHG emissions, financial risk by decreasing volatility of energy prices, and overall expenditure on energy by implementing a disciplined business strategy to cut emissions from its operations. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 7. | Report on Low Carbon Business Planning | | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the report on climate change and business model will develop new methods that can be applied globally when sufficient observations exist. Acknowledging climate change as an inevitable factor, and recognizing the need to adapt, involves bold decisions by business. In accordance with Egan-Jones Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 8. | Report on Scenario Analysis | | | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that transparency is important for evaluating risks and ensuring that investors and stakeholders have adequate information necessary to make informed decisions. In accordance with Egan- Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 9. | Report on Plastic Production | | | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the approval of this proposal would result in the Company incurring unnecessary costs and expenses by duplicating efforts that are already underway and providing additional reports with information that is already available to shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 10. | Report on Political Contributions | | | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: In light of the Company's policies and oversight mechanisms related to its political contributions and activities, we believe that the shareholder proposal is unnecessary and will not result in any additional benefit to the shareholders. Rather, the proposal promotes impractical and imprudent actions that would negatively affect the business and results. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 3,310 | | | | 0 | | | 23-May-2022 | 23-May-2022 | |
| VERISK ANALYTICS, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 92345Y106 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | VRSK | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 25-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US92345Y1064 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935604480 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Jeffrey Dailey | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Constantine P. Iordanou | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Wendy Lane | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Lee M. Shavel | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Kimberly S. Stevenson | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | To approve the Board Declassification Amendment | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | To approve executive compensation on an advisory, non-binding basis. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent auditor for the 2022 fiscal year. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 189 | | | | | 0 | | | 24-May-2022 | 24-May-2022 | |
| BLACKROCK, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 09247X101 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | BLK | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 25-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US09247X1019 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935606890 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Bader M. Alsaad | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Pamela Daley | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Laurence D. Fink | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Beth Ford | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: William E. Ford | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Fabrizio Freda | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Murry S. Gerber | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Margaret "Peggy" L. Johnson | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Robert S. Kapito | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Cheryl D. Mills | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Gordon M. Nixon | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1L. | Election of Director: Kristin C. Peck | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1M. | Election of Director: Charles H. Robbins | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1N. | Election of Director: Marco Antonio Slim Domit | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1O. | Election of Director: Hans E. Vestberg | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1P. | Election of Director: Susan L. Wagner | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1Q. | Election of Director: Mark Wilson | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Approval, in a non-binding advisory vote, of the compensation for named executive officers. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte LLP as BlackRock's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Shareholder Proposal - Adopt stewardship policies designed to curtail corporate activities that externalize social and environmental costs. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 194 | | | | | 0 | | | 23-May-2022 | 23-May-2022 | |
| AMAZON.COM, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 023135106 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | AMZN | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 25-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US0231351067 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935609288 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1a. | Election of Director: Jeffrey P. Bezos | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1b. | Election of Director: Andrew R. Jassy | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1c. | Election of Director: Keith B. Alexander | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1d. | Election of Director: Edith W. Cooper | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1e. | Election of Director: Jamie S. Gorelick | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1f. | Election of Director: Daniel P. Huttenlocher | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1g. | Election of Director: Judith A. McGrath | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1h. | Election of Director: Indra K. Nooyi | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1i. | Election of Director: Jonathan J. Rubinstein | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1j. | Election of Director: Patricia Q. Stonesifer | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1k. | Election of Director: Wendell P. Weeks | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS INDEPENDENT AUDITORS | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY'S RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO EFFECT A 20- FOR-1 SPLIT OF THE COMPANY'S COMMON STOCK AND A PROPORTIONATE INCREASE IN THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED SHARES OF COMMON STOCK | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5. | SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL REQUESTING A REPORT ON RETIREMENT PLAN OPTIONS | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that approval of this proposal will align the interests of the Company's employees with its climate action goals. We recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. | |
| 6. | SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL REQUESTING A REPORT ON CUSTOMER DUE DILIGENCE | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After evaluating the provisions and tenets of the proposal, we determined that the proposed resolution contemplated thereby is advisable, substantively and procedurally fair to, and in the best interests of Company and its shareholders. We recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 7. | SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL REQUESTING AN ALTERNATIVE DIRECTOR CANDIDATE POLICY | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that approval of the proposal will provide a more meaningful way of electing directors. We recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. | | | |
| 8. | SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL REQUESTING A REPORT ON PACKAGING MATERIALS | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the approval of this proposal would result in the Company incurring unnecessary costs and expenses by duplicating efforts that are already underway and providing additional reports with information that is already available to shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 9. | SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL REQUESTING A REPORT ON WORKER HEALTH AND SAFETY DIFFERENCES | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that a company's success depends upon its ability to embrace diversity and to draw upon the skills, expertise and experience of its workforce. As such, ensuring proper health and safety practices in workplace is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. In accordance with Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal |
| 10. | SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL REQUESTING ADDITIONAL REPORTING ON RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH THE USE OF CERTAIN CONTRACT CLAUSES | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval. Here, we find that approval of the proposal will provide the transparency shareholders need to evaluate such activities. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 11. | SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL REQUESTING A REPORT ON CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: In light of the Company's policies and oversight mechanisms related to its charitable contributions and activities, we believe that the shareholder proposal is unnecessary and will not result in any additional benefit to the shareholders. Rather, the proposal promotes impractical and imprudent actions that would negatively affect the business and results. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 12. | SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL REQUESTING ALTERNATIVE TAX REPORTING | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe, that the adoption of this proposal is not critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. As such, in accordance with Egan-Jones Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 13. | SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL REQUESTING ADDITIONAL REPORTING ON FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that improved transparency and accountability will enhance the Company's commitment to long-term sustainability. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 14. | SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL REQUESTING ADDITIONAL REPORTING ON LOBBYING | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that it is in the best interests of the Company and the stockholders to belong to industry associations and coalitions, where the Company benefits from the general business, technical, and industry standard-setting expertise these organizations provide. We furthermore believe that the proposal seeks unnecessary line-item disclosure of lobbying expenditures. We believe that the requested report is unnecessary and would require expenditures and the use of Company resources without providing any meaningful benefit to the shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 15. | SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL REQUESTING A POLICY REQUIRING MORE DIRECTOR CANDIDATES THAN BOARD SEATS | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that approval of the proposal is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. We recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. | | |
| 16. | SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL REQUESTING A REPORT ON WAREHOUSE WORKING CONDITIONS | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval. Here, we find that approval of the proposal will provide the transparency shareholders need to evaluate such activities. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 17. | SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL REQUESTING ADDITIONAL REPORTING ON GENDER/RACIAL PAY | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that approval of the proposal is necessary and warranted in the Company. Pay disparities by gender in companies, in our view, could bring operational risks and reputational damage that is detrimental to shareholder value. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 18. | SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL REQUESTING A DIVERSITY AND EQUITY AUDIT | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that a company's success depends upon its ability to embrace diversity. As such, we believe that adoption of this proposal is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. As such, in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 19. | SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL REQUESTING A REPORT ON CUSTOMER USE OF CERTAIN TECHNOLOGIES | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that approval of the proposal will enable the Company to extend its efforts in mitigating the risks of hate crimes on the Company's brand and reputation. After reviewing the tenets of the proposal and in accordance to Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 118 | | | | | 0 | | | 23-May-2022 | 23-May-2022 | |
| 19-9867MS | | | | | SC ZIEGLER FAMCO FUND AND MS | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 400 | | | | | 0 | | | 23-May-2022 | 23-May-2022 | |
| MORGAN STANLEY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 617446448 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | MS | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 26-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US6174464486 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935584878 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Alistair Darling | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Thomas H. Glocer | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: James P. Gorman | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Robert H. Herz | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Erika H. James | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Hironori Kamezawa | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Shelley B. Leibowitz | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Stephen J. Luczo | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Jami Miscik | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Masato Miyachi | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Dennis M. Nally | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1L. | Election of Director: Mary L. Schapiro | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1M. | Election of Director: Perry M. Traquina | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1N. | Election of Director: Rayford Wilkins, Jr. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as independent auditor | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | To approve the compensation of executives as disclosed in the proxy statement (non- binding advisory vote) | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | Shareholder proposal requesting adoption of a policy to cease financing new fossil fuel development | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After evaluating the provisions and tenets of the proposal, we determined that the proposed resolution contemplated thereby is not advisable and is not in the best interests of Company and its shareholders. We recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 2,690 | | | | 0 | | | 24-May-2022 | 24-May-2022 | |
| DUPONT DE NEMOURS, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 26614N102 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | DD | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 26-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US26614N1028 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935594449 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Amy G. Brady | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Edward D. Breen | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F4 Over-Boarded (Board Chair and CEO) Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that neither Chairman nor CEO, being the most critical roles in a company, should hold more than one other public directorship to ensure the valuable and prudent exercise of their fiduciary duties and that their integrity and efficiency are not compromised, whether the positions are separate or combined. |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Ruby R. Chandy | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Terrence R. Curtin | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Alexander M. Cutler | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Eleuthère I. du Pont | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F10 Affiliation - Ex-Officio - Member of a Key Board Committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director who serves on the Company board in an ex-officio capacity is considered affiliated. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Kristina M. Johnson | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Luther C. Kissam | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Frederick M. Lowery | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Raymond J. Milchovich | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1K. | Election of Director: Deanna M. Mulligan | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1L. | Election of Director: Steven M. Sterin | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Advisory Resolution to Approve Executive Compensation | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for 2022 | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | Independent Board Chair | | | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We have determined that it is a positive corporate governance measure to allow the stockholders to have the ability to take action by written consent, if such written consent or consents sets forth the action to be taken and is signed by the holders of outstanding stock having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting at which all shares entitled to vote on the matter were present and voted. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,944 | | | | 0 | | | 20-May-2022 | 20-May-2022 | |
| CERNER CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 156782104 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | CERN | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 26-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US1567821046 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935595198 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Elder Granger, M.D. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: John J. Greisch | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Melinda J. Mount | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: George A. Riedel | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F19 Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1F. | Election of Director: R. Halsey Wise | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F19 Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 2. | Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of Cerner Corporation for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4A. | Approval of the proposed amendments to our Third Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended (the "Certificate"), to remove the supermajority voting standards for certain business combination transactions with interested stockholders. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4B. | Approval of the proposed amendments to our Certificate to remove the supermajority voting standards to amend or repeal any provision of the Bylaws. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4C. | Approval of the proposed amendments to our Certificate to remove the supermajority voting standards to amend or repeal certain provisions of the Certificate. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4D. | Approval of the proposed amendments to our Certificate to remove the supermajority voting standards to remove a director with cause. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5. | Approval of an amendment and restatement of the Cerner Corporation 2011 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan to increase the number of authorized shares and the plan's term. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account the maximum amount of shareholder equity dilution this proposal could cause, as well as both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the passage of this plan as proposed by the board of directors. We recommend the board seek to align CEO pay more closely with the performance of the company and work to reduce the cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 6. | Shareholder proposal requesting amendment to the Company's governing documents to give shareholders the right to call a special shareholder meeting. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We do not believe it is appropriate to enable holders of at least 10% or more of the common stock to have an unlimited ability to call special meetings for any purpose at any time. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 622 | | | | | 0 | | | 25-May-2022 | 25-May-2022 | |
| MCDONALD'S CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 580135101 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Contested-Annual | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | MCD | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 26-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US5801351017 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935606965 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1. | DIRECTOR | | | | | | | Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | 1 | | Lloyd Dean | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 2 | | Robert Eckert | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 3 | | Catherine Engelbert | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 4 | | Margaret Georgiadis | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 5 | | Enrique Hernandez, Jr. | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 6 | | Christopher Kempczinski | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 7 | | Richard Lenny | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 8 | | John Mulligan | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 9 | | Sheila Penrose | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 10 | | John Rogers, Jr. | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 11 | | Paul Walsh | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 12 | | Miles White | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Advisory vote to approve executive compensation. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Advisory vote to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditor for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Advisory vote on a shareholder proposal requesting to modify the threshold to call special shareholders' meetings, if properly presented. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We do not believe it is appropriate to enable holders of at least 10% or more of the common stock to have an unlimited ability to call special meetings for any purpose at any time. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 5. | Advisory vote on a shareholder proposal requesting a report on reducing plastics use, if properly presented. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 6. | Advisory vote on a shareholder proposal requesting a report on antibiotics and public health costs, if properly presented. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that transparency is important for evaluating risks and ensuring that investors and stakeholders have adequate information necessary to make informed decisions. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 7. | Advisory vote on a shareholder proposal requesting disclosure regarding confinement stall use in the Company's U.S. pork supply chain, if properly presented. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 8. | Advisory vote on a shareholder proposal requesting a third party civil rights audit, if properly presented. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that a company's success depends upon its ability to embrace diversity. As such, we believe that adoption of this proposal is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. As such, in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 9. | Advisory vote on a shareholder proposal requesting a report on lobbying activities and expenditures, if properly presented. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 10. | Advisory vote on a shareholder proposal requesting a report on global public policy and political influence, if properly presented. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 813 | | | | | 0 | | | 24-May-2022 | 24-May-2022 | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 813 | | | | | 0 | | | 24-May-2022 | 24-May-2022 | |
| MCDONALD'S CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 580135101 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Contested-Annual | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | MCD | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 26-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US5801351017 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935625751 - Opposition | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1. | DIRECTOR | | | | | | | Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | 1 | | Leslie Samuelrich | | | | | | | | For | | | | | | | | | | None | | | | |
| | | | 2 | | Maisie Lucia Ganzler | | | | | | | | For | | | | | | | | | | None | | | | |
| | | | 3 | | MGT NOM: Lloyd Dean | | | | | | | | For | | | | | | | | | | None | | | | |
| | | | 4 | | MGT NOM: Robert Eckert | | | | | | | For | | | | | | | | | | None | | | | |
| | | | 5 | | MGT NOM: C. Engelbert | | | | | | | For | | | | | | | | | | None | | | | |
| | | | 6 | | MGT NOM: M. Georgiadis | | | | | | | For | | | | | | | | | | None | | | | |
| | | | 7 | | MGT NOM: E Hernandez Jr | | | | | | | For | | | | | | | | | | None | | | | |
| | | | 8 | | MGT NOM: C. Kempczinski | | | | | | | For | | | | | | | | | | None | | | | |
| | | | 9 | | MGT NOM: John Mulligan | | | | | | | For | | | | | | | | | | None | | | | |
| | | | 10 | | MGT NOM: John Rogers Jr | | | | | | | For | | | | | | | | | | None | | | | |
| | | | 11 | | MGT NOM: Paul Walsh | | | | | | | | For | | | | | | | | | | None | | | | |
| | | | 12 | | MGT NOM: Miles White | | | | | | | | For | | | | | | | | | | None | | | | |
| 2. | Advisory vote to approve the Company's executive compensation. | Management | | | | Against | | | | | | | | | None | | | | |
| 3. | Advisory vote to approve the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company's independent auditor for 2022. | Management | | | | For | | | | | | | | | | None | | | | |
| 4. | Advisory vote on a shareholder proposal requesting to modify the threshold to call special shareholders' meetings, if properly presented. | Shareholder | | | | For | | | | | | | | | | None | | | | |
| 5. | Advisory vote on a shareholder proposal requesting a report on reducing plastics use, if properly presented. | Shareholder | | | | For | | | | | | | | | | None | | | | |
| 6. | Advisory vote on a shareholder proposal requesting a report on antibiotics and public health costs, if properly presented. | Shareholder | | | | For | | | | | | | | | | None | | | | |
| 7. | Advisory vote on a shareholder proposal requesting disclosure regarding confinement stall use in the Company's U.S. pork supply chain, if properly presented. | Shareholder | | | | For | | | | | | | | | | None | | | | |
| 8. | Advisory vote on a shareholder proposal requesting a third- party civil rights audit, if properly presented. | Shareholder | | | | For | | | | | | | | | | None | | | | |
| 9. | Advisory vote on a shareholder proposal requesting a report on lobbying activities and expenditures, if properly presented. | Shareholder | | | | For | | | | | | | | | | None | | | | |
| 10. | Advisory vote on a shareholder proposal requesting a report on global public policy and political influence, if properly presented. | Shareholder | | | | For | | | | | | | | | | None | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 813 | | | | | 0 | | | | | |
| LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 548661107 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | LOW | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 27-May-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US5486611073 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935607210 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1. | DIRECTOR | | | | | | | Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | 1 | | Raul Alvarez | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 2 | | David H. Batchelder | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 3 | | Sandra B. Cochran | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 4 | | Laurie Z. Douglas | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 5 | | Richard W. Dreiling | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| | | | 6 | | Marvin R. Ellison | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 7 | | Daniel J. Heinrich | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 8 | | Brian C. Rogers | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 9 | | Bertram L. Scott | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 10 | | Colleen Taylor | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 11 | | Mary Beth West | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Advisory vote to approve the Company's named executive officer compensation in fiscal 2021. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Approval of the Amended and Restated Lowe's Companies, Inc. 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5. | Shareholder proposal requesting a report on median and adjusted pay gaps across race and gender. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that approval of the proposal is necessary and warranted in the Company. Pay disparities by gender in companies, in our view, could bring operational risks and reputational damage that is detrimental to shareholder value. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 6. | Shareholder proposal regarding amending the Company's proxy access bylaw to remove shareholder aggregation limits. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval. We believe that because the board of directors serves as the representatives of shareholders, shareholders should have the right to nominate their own representatives. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 7. | Shareholder proposal requesting a report on risks of state policies restricting reproductive health care. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe however that the proposal does not contribute to the common benefit of shareholders or to the enhancement of corporate value. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 8. | Shareholder proposal requesting a civil rights and non- discrimination audit and report. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that a company's success depends upon its ability to embrace diversity. As such, we believe that adoption of this proposal is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. As such, in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 9. | Shareholder proposal requesting a report on risks from worker misclassification by certain Company vendors. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the adoption of a more comprehensive human rights policy, coupled with implementation, enforcement, independent monitoring, and transparent, comprehensive reporting will assure shareholders of the Company's global leadership. We recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,022 | | | | 0 | | | 24-May-2022 | 24-May-2022 | |
| WALMART INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 931142103 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | WMT | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 01-Jun-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US9311421039 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935613491 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1a. | Election of Director: Cesar Conde | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1b. | Election of Director: Timothy P. Flynn | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1c. | Election of Director: Sarah J. Friar | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1d. | Election of Director: Carla A. Harris | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1e. | Election of Director: Thomas W. Horton | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1f. | Election of Director: Marissa A. Mayer | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1g. | Election of Director: C. Douglas McMillon | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1h. | Election of Director: Gregory B. Penner | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | �� | | |
| | | Comments: F22 Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the leadership of the Chairman of the Board. |
| 1i. | Election of Director: Randall L. Stephenson | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1j. | Election of Director: S. Robson Walton | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1k. | Election of Director: Steuart L. Walton | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as Independent Accountants | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Report on Animal Welfare Practices | | | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5. | Create a Pandemic Workforce Advisory Council | | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 6. | Report on Impacts of Reproductive Healthcare Legislation | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 7. | Report on Alignment of Racial Justice Goals and Starting Wages | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that approval of the proposal is necessary and warranted in the Company. Pay disparities in companies, in our view, could bring operational risks and reputational damage that is detrimental to shareholder value. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 8. | Civil Rights and Non-Discrimination Audit | | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that a company's success depends upon its ability to embrace diversity. As such, we believe that adoption of this proposal is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. As such, in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 9. | Report on Charitable Donation Disclosures | | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: I | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 10. | Report on Lobbying Disclosures | | | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,645 | | | | 0 | | | 31-May-2022 | 31-May-2022 | |
| COMCAST CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 20030N101 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | CMCSA | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 01-Jun-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US20030N1019 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935613693 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1. | DIRECTOR | | | | | | | Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | 1 | | Kenneth J. Bacon | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 2 | | Madeline S. Bell | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 3 | | Edward D. Breen | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| | | | 4 | | Gerald L. Hassell | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| | | | 5 | | Jeffrey A. Honickman | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| | | | 6 | | Maritza G. Montiel | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 7 | | Asuka Nakahara | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 8 | | David C. Novak | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| | | | 9 | | Brian L. Roberts | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F21 Combined CEO and Board Chair Positions and the Company Earns a Board Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having the CEO or former CEO serve as the Chairman of the Board. Consequently, we prefer that companies focus on the following areas to improve its corporate governance practices: separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO, hold annual director elections, have one class of voting stock only, have key board committees consisting of independent directors and majority of independent directors on board and include non-binding compensation vote on agenda to further ensure board independence and accountability. F22 Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the leadership of the Chairman of the Board. |
| 2. | Advisory vote on executive compensation | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Ratification of the appointment of our independent auditors | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | To report on charitable donations | | | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: In light of the Company's policies and oversight mechanisms related to its charitable contributions and activities, we believe that the shareholder proposal is unnecessary and will not result in any additional benefit to the shareholders. Rather, the proposal promotes impractical and imprudent actions that would negatively affect the business and results. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 5. | To perform independent racial equity audit | | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that a company's success depends upon its ability to embrace diversity. As such, we believe that adoption of this proposal is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. As such, in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 6. | To report on risks of omitting "viewpoint" and "ideology" from EEO policy | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that approval of the proposal will enable the Company to avoid legal and reputational risk arising from harassment and discrimination. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 7. | To conduct and publicly release the results of an independent investigation into the effectiveness of sexual harassment policies | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that approval of the proposal will enable the Company to avoid legal and reputational risk arising from harassment and discrimination. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 8. | To report on how retirement plan options align with company climate goals | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After evaluating the provisions and tenets of the proposal, we determined that the proposed resolution contemplated thereby is advisable, substantively and procedurally fair to, and in the best interests of Company and its shareholders. We recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 212 | | | | | 0 | | | 31-May-2022 | 31-May-2022 | |
| 19-9867MS | | | | | SC ZIEGLER FAMCO FUND AND MS | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 4,980 | | | | 0 | | | 31-May-2022 | 31-May-2022 | |
| ALPHABET INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 02079K305 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | GOOGL | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 01-Jun-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US02079K3059 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935618578 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1a. | Election of Director: Larry Page | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1b. | Election of Director: Sergey Brin | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1c. | Election of Director: Sundar Pichai | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1d. | Election of Director: John L. Hennessy | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F22 Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the leadership of the Chairman of the Board. |
| 1e. | Election of Director: Frances H. Arnold | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1f. | Election of Director: L. John Doerr | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F20 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1g. | Election of Director: Roger W. Ferguson Jr. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1h. | Election of Director: Ann Mather | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1i. | Election of Director: K. Ram Shriram | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F20 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1j. | Election of Director: Robin L. Washington | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F20 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 2. | Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Alphabet's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | The amendment of Alphabet's 2021 Stock Plan to increase the share reserve by 4,000,000 shares of Class C capital stock. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account the maximum amount of shareholder equity dilution this proposal could cause, as well as both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the passage of this plan as proposed by the board of directors. We recommend the board seek to align CEO pay more closely with the performance of the company and work to reduce the cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | The amendment of Alphabet's Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5. | A stockholder proposal regarding a lobbying report, if properly presented at the meeting. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that it is in the best interests of the Company and the stockholders to belong to industry associations and coalitions, where the Company benefits from the general business, technical, and industry standard-setting expertise these organizations provide. We furthermore believe that the proposal seeks unnecessary line-item disclosure of lobbying expenditures. We believe that the requested report is unnecessary and would require expenditures and the use of Company resources without providing any meaningful benefit to the shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 6. | A stockholder proposal regarding a climate lobbying report, if properly presented at the meeting. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that it is in the best interests of the Company and the stockholders to belong to industry associations and coalitions, where the Company benefits from the general business, technical, and industry standard-setting expertise these organizations provide. We furthermore believe that the proposal seeks unnecessary line-item disclosure of lobbying expenditures. We believe that the requested report is unnecessary and would require expenditures and the use of Company resources without providing any meaningful benefit to the shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 7. | A stockholder proposal regarding a report on physical risks of climate change, if properly presented at the meeting. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that transparency is important for evaluating risks and ensuring that investors and stakeholders have adequate information necessary to make informed decisions. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 8. | A stockholder proposal regarding a report on water management risks, if properly presented at the meeting. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that transparency is important for evaluating risks and ensuring that investors and stakeholders have adequate information necessary to make informed decisions. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 9. | A stockholder proposal regarding a racial equity audit, if properly presented at the meeting. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that a company's success depends upon its ability to embrace diversity. As such, we believe that adoption of this proposal is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. As such, in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 10. | A stockholder proposal regarding a report on concealment clauses, if properly presented at the meeting. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval. Here, we find that approval of the proposal will provide the transparency shareholders need to evaluate such activities. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 11. | A stockholder proposal regarding equal shareholder voting, if properly presented at the meeting. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that shareholder approval is warranted. We oppose such differential voting power as it may have the effect of denying shareholders the opportunity to vote on matters of critical economic importance to them. We prefer that companies do not utilize multiple class capital structures to provide equal voting rights to all shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 12. | A stockholder proposal regarding a report on government takedown requests, if properly presented at the meeting. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that improved transparency and accountability is needed to meet the company's long-term responsibility to its many investors. We believe that the preparation of the report will allow the Company to evaluate its activities related to political advertising and potential censorship issues, and at the same time assess the operational, reputational, and social implications of such to the Company. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 13. | A stockholder proposal regarding a human rights assessment of data center siting, if properly presented at the meeting. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the adoption of a more comprehensive human rights policy, coupled with implementation, enforcement, independent monitoring, and transparent, comprehensive reporting will assure shareholders of the Company's global leadership. We recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 14. | A stockholder proposal regarding a report on data collection, privacy, and security, if properly presented at the meeting. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that transparency is important for evaluating risks and ensuring that investors and stakeholders have adequate information necessary to make informed decisions. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 15. | A stockholder proposal regarding algorithm disclosures, if properly presented at the meeting. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that transparency is important for evaluating risks and ensuring that investors and stakeholders have adequate information necessary to make informed decisions. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 16. | A stockholder proposal regarding misinformation and disinformation, if properly presented at the meeting. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that transparency is important for evaluating risks and ensuring that investors and stakeholders have adequate information necessary to make informed decisions. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 17. | A stockholder proposal regarding a report on external costs of disinformation, if properly presented at the meeting. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that transparency is important for evaluating risks and ensuring that investors and stakeholders have adequate information necessary to make informed decisions. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 18. | A stockholder proposal regarding a report on board diversity, if properly presented at the meeting. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval. We believe that the proposal would encourage good governance and enhance shareholder value by bringing together a diverse range of skills and experience necessary in building a constructive and challenging board. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 19. | A stockholder proposal regarding the establishment of an environmental sustainability board committee, if properly presented at the meeting. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that environmental issues are needed to be escalated at the board level to ensure proper accountability and oversight. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 20. | A stockholder proposal regarding a policy on non-management employee representative director, if properly presented at the meeting. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the proposal is not necessary and is not in the best long-term interest of the Company and its shareholders. As such, in accordance with Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 21. | A stockholder proposal regarding a report on policies regarding military and militarized policing agencies, if properly presented at the meeting. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We do not believe that the review and report requested by this proposal are warranted or that the report would be informative to shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 72 | | | | | 0 | | | 29-May-2022 | 29-May-2022 | |
| 19-9867MS | | | | | SC ZIEGLER FAMCO FUND AND MS | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 380 | | | | | 0 | | | 29-May-2022 | 29-May-2022 | |
| NXP SEMICONDUCTORS NV. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | N6596X109 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | NXPI | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 01-Jun-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | NL0009538784 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935648545 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1. | Adoption of the 2021 Statutory Annual Accounts | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Discharge of the members of the Board for their responsibilities in the financial year ended December 31, 2021 | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3a. | Re-appoint Kurt Sievers as executive director | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3b. | Re-appoint Sir Peter Bonfield as non- executive director | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F3 Over-Boarded (Board Chair) According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Chairman, being responsible for the leadership of the Board and the creation of the conditions necessary for overall board and individual director effectiveness, should hold no more than one other public directorship to ensure the valuable and prudent exercise of his/her fiduciary duties as a Chairman and that his/her integrity and efficiency are not compromised. |
| 3c. | Re-appoint Annette Clayton as non- executive director | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3d. | Re-appoint Anthony Foxx as non-executive director | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3e. | Appoint Chunyuan Gu as non-executive director | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3f. | Re-appoint Lena Olving as non-executive director | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3g. | Re-appoint Julie Southern as non-executive director | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3h. | Re-appoint Jasmin Staiblin as non- executive director | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3i. | Re-appoint Gregory Summe as non- executive director | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3j. | Re-appoint Karl-Henrik Sundström as non- executive director | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | Authorization of the Board to issue ordinary shares of the Company and grant rights to acquire ordinary shares | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5. | Authorization of the Board to restrict or exclude pre-emption rights accruing in connection with an issue of shares or grant of rights | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 6. | Authorization of the Board to repurchase ordinary shares | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 7. | Authorization of the Board to cancel ordinary shares held or to be acquired by the Company | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 8. | Non-binding, advisory approval of the Named Executive Officers' compensation | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 610 | | | | | 0 | | | 31-May-2022 | 31-May-2022 | |
| ALLEGION PLC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | G0176J109 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | ALLE | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 02-Jun-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | IE00BFRT3W74 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935609365 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Kirk S. Hachigian | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Steven C. Mizell | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1C. | Election of Director: Nicole Parent Haughey | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Lauren B. Peters | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: David D. Petratis | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F22 Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Rating of Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Rating. We believe that cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the leadership of the Chairman of the Board. |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Dean I. Schaffer | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Dev Vardhan | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Martin E. Welch III | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Advisory approval of the compensation of the Company's named executive officers. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Approval of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers as independent auditors of the Company and authorize the Audit and Finance Committee of the Board of Directors to set the auditors' remuneration. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After, taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Resolution. |
| 4. | Approval of renewal of the Board of Directors' existing authority to issue shares. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5. | Approval of renewal of the Board of Directors' existing authority to issue shares for cash without first offering shares to existing shareholders (Special Resolution). | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 439 | | | | | 0 | | | 27-May-2022 | 27-May-2022 | |
| PAYPAL HOLDINGS, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 70450Y103 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | PYPL | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 02-Jun-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US70450Y1038 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935613744 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1a. | Election of Director: Rodney C. Adkins | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1b. | Election of Director: Jonathan Christodoro | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1c. | Election of Director: John J. Donahoe | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1d. | Election of Director: David W. Dorman | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1e. | Election of Director: Belinda J. Johnson | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1f. | Election of Director: Enrique Lores | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1g. | Election of Director: Gail J. McGovern | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1h. | Election of Director: Deborah M. Messemer | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1i. | Election of Director: David M. Moffett | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1j. | Election of Director: Ann M. Sarnoff | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1k. | Election of Director: Daniel H. Schulman | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1l. | Election of Director: Frank D. Yeary | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Advisory Vote on the Frequency of the Stockholder Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation. | Management | 1 Year | | | 1 Year | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | Ratification of the Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Our Independent Auditor for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 5. | Stockholder Proposal - Special Shareholder Meeting Improvement. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of at least 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,352 | | | | 0 | | | 01-Jun-2022 | 01-Jun-2022 | |
| NVIDIA CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 67066G104 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | NVDA | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 02-Jun-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US67066G1040 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935618299 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1A. | Election of Director: Robert K. Burgess | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F20 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1B. | Election of Director: Tench Coxe | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F20 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1C. | Election of Director: John O. Dabiri | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F20 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1D. | Election of Director: Persis S. Drell | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1E. | Election of Director: Jen-Hsun Huang | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1F. | Election of Director: Dawn Hudson | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F20 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1G. | Election of Director: Harvey C. Jones | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F20 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company's SOP Fails Egan-Jones Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1H. | Election of Director: Michael G. McCaffery | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Stephen C. Neal | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1J. | Election of Director: Mark L. Perry | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1K. | Election of Director: A. Brooke Seawell | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1L. | Election of Director: Aarti Shah | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1M. | Election of Director: Mark A. Stevens | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 2. | Advisory approval of our executive compensation. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2023. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Approval of an amendment to our charter to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 4 billion to 8 billion shares. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5. | Approval of an amendment and restatement of our Amended and Restated 2007 Equity Incentive Plan. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account the maximum amount of shareholder equity dilution this proposal could cause, as well as both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the passage of this plan as proposed by the board of directors. We recommend the board seek to align CEO pay more closely with the performance of the company and work to reduce the cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 947 | | | | | 0 | | | 30-May-2022 | 30-May-2022 | |
| 19-9867MS | | | | | SC ZIEGLER FAMCO FUND AND MS | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 2,280 | | | | 0 | | | 30-May-2022 | 30-May-2022 | |
| NETFLIX, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 64110L106 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | NFLX | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 02-Jun-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US64110L1061 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935620422 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1a. | Election of Class II director to hold office until the 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders: Timothy Haley | Management | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1b. | Election of Class II director to hold office until the 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders: Leslie Kilgore | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1c. | Election of Class II director to hold office until the 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders: Strive Masiyiwa | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1d. | Election of Class II director to hold office until the 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders: Ann Mather | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Management Proposal: Declassification of the Board of Directors. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Management Proposal: Elimination of Supermajority Voting Provisions. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | Management Proposal: Creation of a New Stockholder Right to Call a Special Meeting. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of at least 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the proposal, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 5. | Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 6. | Advisory Approval of Executive Officer Compensation. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 7. | Stockholder Proposal entitled, "Proposal 7 - Simple Majority Vote," if properly presented at the meeting. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: In accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we believe that the advantages of eliminating supermajority provisions outweigh the benefits of maintaining it as a voting standard. We believe that a simple majority vote will strengthen the Company's corporate governance practice. Contrary to supermajority voting, a simple majority standard will give the shareholders equal and fair representation in the Company by limiting the power of shareholders who own a large stake in the entity, therefore, paving way for a more meaningful voting outcome. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 8. | Stockholder Proposal entitled, "Proposal 8 - Lobbying Activity Report," if properly presented at the meeting. | Management | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that it is in the best interests of the Company and the stockholders to belong to industry associations and coalitions, where the Company benefits from the general business, technical, and industry standard-setting expertise these organizations provide. We furthermore believe that the proposal seeks unnecessary line-item disclosure of lobbying expenditures. We believe that the requested report is unnecessary and would require expenditures and the use of Company resources without providing any meaningful benefit to the shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 491 | | | | | 0 | | | 31-May-2022 | 31-May-2022 | |
| DIGITAL REALTY TRUST, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 253868103 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | DLR | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 03-Jun-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US2538681030 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935614621 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1a. | Election of Director: Laurence A. Chapman | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F22 Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the leadership of the Chairman of the Board. |
| 1b. | Election of Director: Alexis Black Bjorlin | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1c. | Election of Director: VeraLinn Jamieson | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1d. | Election of Director: Kevin J. Kennedy | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1e. | Election of Director: William G. LaPerch | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1f. | Election of Director: Jean F.H.P. Mandeville | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1g. | Election of Director: Afshin Mohebbi | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1h. | Election of Director: Mark R. Patterson | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1i. | Election of Director: Mary Hogan Preusse | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1j. | Election of Director: Dennis E. Singleton | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1k. | Election of Director: A. William Stein | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | To ratify the selection of KPMG LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | To approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of the Company's named executive officers, as more fully described in the accompanying Proxy Statement (say on pay). | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | A stockholder proposal regarding reporting on concealment clauses. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the proposal warrants shareholder approval. Here, we find that approval of the proposal will provide the transparency shareholders need to evaluate such activities. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 460 | | | | | 0 | | | 01-Jun-2022 | 01-Jun-2022 | |
| UnitedHealth Group | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 91324P102 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | UNH | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 06-Jun-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US91324P1021 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935618453 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1a. | Election of Director: Timothy P. Flynn | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1b. | Election of Director: Paul R. Garcia | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1c. | Election of Director: Stephen J. Hemsley | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F22 Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the leadership of the Chairman of the Board. |
| 1d. | Election of Director: Michele J. Hooper | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1e. | Election of Director: F. William McNabb III | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1f. | Election of Director: Valerie C. Montgomery Rice, M.D. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1g. | Election of Director: John H. Noseworthy, M.D. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1h. | Election of Director: Andrew Witty | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Advisory approval of the Company's executive compensation. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Company for the year ending December 31, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | If properly presented at the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the shareholder proposal seeking shareholder ratification of termination pay. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the Company's compensation practices have been and will continue to be a key factor in the ability to deliver strong results. Furthermore, we believe that adopting the this proposal would put the Company at a competitive advantage in recruiting and retaining executive talent and that it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders for the independent Compensation Committee to retain the flexibility to design and administer competitive compensation program. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 5. | If properly presented at the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the shareholder proposal regarding political contributions congruency report. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: In light of the Company's policies and oversight mechanisms related to its political contributions and activities, we believe that the shareholder proposal is unnecessary and will not result in any additional benefit to the shareholders. Rather, the proposal promotes impractical and imprudent actions that would negatively affect the business and results. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 153 | | | | | 0 | | | 01-Jun-2022 | 01-Jun-2022 | |
| 19-9867MS | | | | | SC ZIEGLER FAMCO FUND AND MS | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,170 | | | | 0 | | | 01-Jun-2022 | 01-Jun-2022 | |
| PENN NATIONAL GAMING, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 707569109 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | PENN | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 07-Jun-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US7075691094 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935615003 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1. | DIRECTOR | | | | | | | Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | 1 | | Barbara Shattuck Kohn | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F19 Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| | | | 2 | | Ronald J. Naples | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 3 | | Saul V. Reibstein | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F19 Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 2. | Ratification of the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the 2022 fiscal year. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation paid to the Company's named executive officers. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Approval of the Company's 2022 Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account the maximum amount of shareholder equity dilution this proposal could cause, as well as both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the passage of this plan as proposed by the board of directors. We recommend the board seek to align CEO pay more closely with the performance of the company and work to reduce the cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 2,336 | | | | 0 | | | 03-Jun-2022 | 03-Jun-2022 | |
| COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORP. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 192446102 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | CTSH | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 07-Jun-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US1924461023 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935626626 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1a. | Election of Director to serve until the 2023 Annual meeting: Zein Abdalla | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1b. | Election of Director to serve until the 2023 Annual meeting: Vinita Bali | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1c. | Election of Director to serve until the 2023 Annual meeting: Maureen Breakiron-Evans | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1d. | Election of Director to serve until the 2023 Annual meeting: Archana Deskus | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1e. | Election of Director to serve until the 2023 Annual meeting: John M. Dineen | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1f. | Election of Director to serve until the 2023 Annual meeting: Brian Humphries | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1g. | Election of Director to serve until the 2023 Annual meeting: Leo S. Mackay, Jr. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1h. | Election of Director to serve until the 2023 Annual meeting: Michael Patsalos-Fox | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1i. | Election of Director to serve until the 2023 Annual meeting: Stephen J. Rohleder | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1j. | Election of Director to serve until the 2023 Annual meeting: Joseph M. Velli | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1k. | Election of Director to serve until the 2023 Annual meeting: Sandra S. Wijnberg | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation of the company's named executive officers. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the company's independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Shareholder proposal requesting that the board of directors take action as necessary to amend the existing right for shareholders to call a special meeting. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 596 | | | | | 0 | | | 02-Jun-2022 | 02-Jun-2022 | |
| THE TJX COMPANIES, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 872540109 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | TJX | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 07-Jun-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US8725401090 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935636146 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1a. | Election of Director: José B. Alvarez | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F19 Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1b. | Election of Director: Alan M. Bennett | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F19 Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1c. | Election of Director: Rosemary T. Berkery | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F19 Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are |
| | | centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1d. | Election of Director: David T. Ching | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1e. | Election of Director: C. Kim Goodwin | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1f. | Election of Director: Ernie Herrman | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1g. | Election of Director: Michael F. Hines | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1h. | Election of Director: Amy B. Lane | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1i. | Election of Director: Carol Meyrowitz | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1j. | Election of Director: Jackwyn L. Nemerov | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F19 Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1k. | Election of Director: John F. O'Brien | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 2. | Ratification of appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers as TJX's independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2023 | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Approval of Stock Incentive Plan (2022 Restatement) | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account the maximum amount of shareholder equity dilution this proposal could cause, as well as both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the passage of this plan as proposed by the board of directors. We recommend the board seek to align CEO pay more closely with the performance of the company and work to reduce the cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Advisory approval of TJX's executive compensation (the say-on- pay vote) | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 5. | Shareholder proposal for a report on effectiveness of social compliance efforts in TJX's supply chain | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the adoption of a more comprehensive implementation, enforcement, independent monitoring, and transparent, comprehensive reporting on human rights in the Company' s supply chain will assure shareholders of the Company's global leadership. We recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 6. | Shareholder proposal for a report on risk to TJX from supplier misclassification of supplier's employees | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the adoption of a more comprehensive human rights policy, coupled with implementation, enforcement, independent monitoring, and transparent, comprehensive reporting will assure shareholders of the Company's global leadership. We recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 7. | Shareholder proposal for a report on risk due to restrictions on reproductive rights | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the approval of this proposal would result in the Company incurring unnecessary costs and expenses by duplicating efforts that are already underway and providing additional reports with information that is already available to shareholders. As such, in accordance with Egan-Jones Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 8. | Shareholder proposal to adopt a paid sick leave policy for all Associates | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe, that the adoption of this proposal is not critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. As such, in accordance with Egan-Jones Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 2,392 | | | | 0 | | | 03-Jun-2022 | 03-Jun-2022 | |
| MATCH GROUP, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 57667L107 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | MTCH | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 08-Jun-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US57667L1070 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935622957 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1a. | Election of Director: Stephen Bailey | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1b. | Election of Director: Melissa Brenner | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1c. | Election of Director: Alan G. Spoon | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | To approve a non-binding advisory resolution on executive compensation. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | To conduct a non-binding advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation. | Management | 1 Year | | | 1 Year | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Match Group, Inc.'s independent registered public accounting firm for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 742 | | | | | 0 | | | 06-Jun-2022 | 06-Jun-2022 | |
| PARAMOUNT GLOBAL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 92556H206 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | PARA | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 08-Jun-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US92556H2067 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935625117 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1. | Non-Voting agenda | | | | Management | Abstain | | | None | | | | | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,161 | | | | 0 | | | 06-Jun-2022 | 06-Jun-2022 | |
| MARKETAXESS HOLDINGS INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 57060D108 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | MKTX | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 08-Jun-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US57060D1081 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935625737 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1a. | Election of Director: Richard M. McVey | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1b. | Election of Director: Nancy Altobello | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1c. | Election of Director: Steven L. Begleiter | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1d. | Election of Director: Stephen P. Casper | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1e. | Election of Director: Jane Chwick | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1f. | Election of Director: Christopher R. Concannon | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1g. | Election of Director: William F. Cruger | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1h. | Election of Director: Kourtney Gibson | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1i. | Election of Director: Justin G. Gmelich | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1j. | Election of Director: Richard G. Ketchum | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1k. | Election of Director: Xiaojia Charles Li | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1l. | Election of Director: Emily H. Portney | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1m. | Election of Director: Richard L. Prager | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 2. | To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company's named executive officers as disclosed in the 2022 Proxy Statement. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | To approve the MarketAxess Holdings Inc. 2022 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 81 | | | | | 0 | | | 06-Jun-2022 | 06-Jun-2022 | |
| CATERPILLAR INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 149123101 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | CAT | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 08-Jun-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US1491231015 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935627729 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1a. | Election of Director: Kelly A. Ayotte | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1b. | Election of Director: David L. Calhoun | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1c. | Election of Director: Daniel M. Dickinson | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1d. | Election of Director: Gerald Johnson | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1e. | Election of Director: David W. MacLennan | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1f. | Election of Director: Debra L. Reed-Klages | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1g. | Election of Director: Edward B. Rust, Jr. | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1h. | Election of Director: Susan C. Schwab | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1i. | Election of Director: D. James Umpleby III | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1j. | Election of Director: Rayford Wilkins, Jr. | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 2. | Ratification of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Some Concerns and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Shareholder Proposal - Report on Climate | | Shareholder | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 5. | Shareholder Proposal - Lobbying Disclosure | | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that it is in the best interests of the Company and the stockholders to belong to industry associations and coalitions, where the Company benefits from the general business, technical, and industry standard-setting expertise these organizations provide. We furthermore believe that the proposal seeks unnecessary line-item disclosure of lobbying expenditures. We believe that the requested report is unnecessary and would require expenditures and the use of Company resources without providing any meaningful benefit to the shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 6. | Shareholder Proposal - Report on Activities in Conflict- Affected Areas | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that transparency is important for evaluating risks and ensuring that investors and stakeholders have adequate information necessary to make informed decisions. Accordingly, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 7. | Shareholder Proposal - Special Shareholder Meeting Improvement | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of at least 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 926 | | | | | 0 | | | 06-Jun-2022 | 06-Jun-2022 | |
| FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 35671D857 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | FCX | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 09-Jun-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US35671D8570 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935615279 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1a. | Election of Director: David P. Abney | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1b. | Election of Director: Richard C. Adkerson | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1c. | Election of Director: Marcela E. Donadio | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1d. | Election of Director: Robert W. Dudley | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1e. | Election of Director: Hugh Grant | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1f. | Election of Director: Lydia H. Kennard | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1g. | Election of Director: Ryan M. Lance | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1h. | Election of Director: Sara Grootwassink Lewis | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1I. | Election of Director: Dustan E. McCoy | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1j. | Election of Director: John J. Stephens | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1k. | Election of Director: Frances Fragos Townsend | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 3,608 | | | | 0 | | | 06-Jun-2022 | 06-Jun-2022 | |
| SERVICENOW, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 81762P102 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | NOW | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 09-Jun-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US81762P1021 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935626068 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1a. | Election of Director: Susan L. Bostrom | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1b. | Election of Director: Teresa Briggs | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1c. | Election of Director: Jonathan C. Chadwick | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1d. | Election of Director: Paul E. Chamberlain | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1e. | Election of Director: Lawrence J. Jackson, Jr. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1f. | Election of Director: Frederic B. Luddy | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1g. | Election of Director: Jeffrey A. Miller | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1h. | Election of Director: Joseph "Larry" Quinlan | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1i. | Election of Director: Sukumar Rathnam | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers ("Say-on-Pay"). | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | To ratify PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 313 | | | | | 0 | | | 06-Jun-2022 | 06-Jun-2022 | |
| SALESFORCE, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 79466L302 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | CRM | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 09-Jun-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US79466L3024 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935626258 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1a. | Election of Director: Marc Benioff | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F21 Combined CEO and Board Chair Positions and the Company Earns a Board Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that there is an inherent potential conflict in having the CEO or former CEO serve as the Chairman of the Board. Consequently, we prefer that companies focus on the following areas to improve its corporate governance practices: separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO, hold annual director elections, have one class of voting stock only, have key board committees consisting of independent directors and majority of independent directors on board and include non-binding compensation vote on agenda to further ensure board independence and accountability. |
| 1b. | Election of Director: Bret Taylor | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1c. | Election of Director: Laura Alber | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1d. | Election of Director: Craig Conway | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1e. | Election of Director: Parker Harris | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1f. | Election of Director: Alan Hassenfeld | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1g. | Election of Director: Neelie Kroes | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1h. | Election of Director: Oscar Munoz | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1i. | Election of Director: Sanford Robertson | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1j. | Election of Director: John V. Roos | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1k. | Election of Director: Robin Washington | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1l. | Election of Director: Maynard Webb | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1m. | Election of Director: Susan Wojcicki | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Amendment and restatement of our 2013 Equity Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares reserved for issuance. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account the maximum amount of shareholder equity dilution this proposal could cause, as well as both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the passage of this plan as proposed by the board of directors. We recommend the board seek to align CEO pay more closely with the performance of the company and work to reduce the cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Amendment and restatement of our 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan to increase the number of shares reserved for issuance. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 4. | Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2023. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 5. | An advisory vote to approve the fiscal 2022 compensation of our named executive officers. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 6. | A stockholder proposal requesting a policy to require the Chair of the Board of Directors be an independent member of the Board, if properly presented at the meeting. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that there is an inherent potential conflict, in having an Inside director serve as the Chairman of the board. Consequently, we prefer that companies separate the roles of the Chairman and CEO and that the Chairman be independent to further ensure board independence and accountability. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 7. | A stockholder proposal requesting a racial equity audit, if properly presented at the meeting. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the proposal would encourage good governance and after evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 884 | | | | | 0 | | | 06-Jun-2022 | 06-Jun-2022 | |
| BOOKING HOLDINGS INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 09857L108 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | BKNG | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 09-Jun-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US09857L1089 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935631110 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1. | DIRECTOR | | | | | | | Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | 1 | | Timothy Armstrong | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| | | | 2 | | Glenn D. Fogel | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 3 | | Mirian M. Graddick-Weir | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| | | | 4 | | Wei Hopeman | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 5 | | Robert J. Mylod, Jr. | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| | | | 6 | | Charles H. Noski | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 7 | | Nicholas J. Read | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 8 | | Thomas E. Rothman | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 9 | | Sumit Singh | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 10 | | Lynn V. Radakovich | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| | | | 11 | | Vanessa A. Wittman | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Advisory vote to approve 2021 executive compensation. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Stockholder proposal requesting the right of stockholders holding 10% of outstanding shares of common stock to call a special meeting. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 5. | Stockholder proposal requesting the Board of Directors incorporate climate change metrics into executive compensation arrangements for our Chief Executive Officer and at least one other senior executive. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: Acknowledging climate change as an inevitable factor, and recognizing the need to adapt, involves bold decisions by business. Therefore, we believe that companies should review how climate change impacts the executive remuneration arrangements of the executives. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 51 | | | | | 0 | | | 07-Jun-2022 | 07-Jun-2022 | |
| REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 75886F107 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | REGN | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 10-Jun-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US75886F1075 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935620383 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1a. | Election of Director: Bonnie L. Bassler, Ph.D. | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1b. | Election of Director: Michael S. Brown, M.D. | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1c. | Election of Director: Leonard S. Schleifer, M.D., Ph.D. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1d. | Election of Director: George D. Yancopoulos, M.D., Ph.D. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Proposal to approve, on an advisory basis, executive compensation. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 95 | | | | | 0 | | | 07-Jun-2022 | 07-Jun-2022 | |
| MONSTER BEVERAGE CORPORATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 61174X109 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | MNST | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 14-Jun-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US61174X1090 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935630384 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1. | DIRECTOR | | | | | | | Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | 1 | | Rodney C. Sacks | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 2 | | Hilton H. Schlosberg | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 3 | | Mark J. Hall | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 4 | | Ana Demel | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 5 | | James L. Dinkins | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 6 | | Gary P. Fayard | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 7 | | Tiffany M. Hall | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 8 | | Jeanne P. Jackson | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| | | | 9 | | Steven G. Pizula | | | | | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | 10 | | Mark S. Vidergauz | | | | | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 2. | Proposal to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Proposal to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of the Company's named executive officers. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | To consider a stockholder proposal regarding a report on the Company's plans to reduce greenhouse gas emissions; if properly presented at the Annual Meeting. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that setting clear-cut goals will help the Company reduce its regulatory risk related to GHG emissions, financial risk by decreasing volatility of energy prices, and overall expenditure on energy by implementing a disciplined business strategy to cut emissions from its operations. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 1,170 | | | | 0 | | | 10-Jun-2022 | 10-Jun-2022 | |
| ETSY, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 29786A106 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | ETSY | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 15-Jun-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US29786A1060 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935625600 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1a. | Election of Class I Director to serve until our 2025 Annual Meeting: C. Andrew Ballard | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1b. | Election of Class I Director to serve until our 2025 Annual Meeting: Jonathan D. Klein | Management | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1c. | Election of Class I Director to serve until our 2025 Annual Meeting: Margaret M. Smyth | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Advisory vote to approve executive compensation. | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 244 | | | | | 0 | | | 10-Jun-2022 | 10-Jun-2022 | |
| AUTODESK, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 052769106 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | ADSK | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 16-Jun-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US0527691069 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935625814 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1a. | Election of Director: Andrew Anagnost | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1b. | Election of Director: Karen Blasing | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1c | Election of Director: Reid French | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F19 Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1d. | Election of Director: Dr. Ayanna Howard | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1e. | Election of Director: Blake Irving | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F19 Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1f. | Election of Director: Mary T. McDowell | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F19 Member of the Compensation Committee and Compensation Score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention and the Compensation Plan Fails Dilution Model According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. Moreover, Egan-Jones believes that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such disapproval and that the board as a whole should seek to align CEO and employee pay more clearly as well as link that pay with the performance of the company, and work to reduce the potential cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. |
| 1g. | Election of Director: Stephen Milligan | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1h. | Election of Director: Lorrie M. Norrington | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1i. | Election of Director: Betsy Rafael | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1j. | Election of Director: Stacy J. Smith | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F22 Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the leadership of the Chairman of the Board. |
| 2. | Ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Autodesk, Inc.'s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2023. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation of Autodesk, Inc.'s named executive officers. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Approve the Autodesk 2022 Equity Incentive Plan. | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account the maximum amount of shareholder equity dilution this proposal could cause, as well as both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the passage of this plan as proposed by the board of directors. We recommend the board seek to align CEO pay more closely with the performance of the company and work to reduce the cost of any similar plan that may be proposed in the future. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 285 | | | | | 0 | | | 14-Jun-2022 | 14-Jun-2022 | |
| MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 609839105 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | MPWR | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 16-Jun-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US6098391054 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935641060 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1.1 | Election of Director: Michael Hsing | | | Management | Withheld | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F22 Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the leadership of the Chairman of the Board. |
| 1.2 | Election of Director: Herbert Chang | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1.3 | Election of Director: Carintia Martinez | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Approve, on an advisory basis, the 2021 executive compensation. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 184 | | | | | 0 | | | 13-Jun-2022 | 13-Jun-2022 | |
| AON PLC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | G0403H108 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | AON | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 17-Jun-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | IE00BLP1HW54 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935632857 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1a. | Election of Director: Lester B. Knight | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F22 Chairman of the Board and the Company Earns a Cyber Security Risk Score of Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Chairman of the Board should be held accountable in cases when the Company obtains the score of Needs Attention on the Cyber Security Risk Score. We believe that cyber security should be critical for all organizations given the rise of the cyber threats and data breaches in the corporate scene, which could affect any organization's reputation and lead to declined investor confidence. As such, Egan-Jones believes that in order to avoid risks of data breaches any cybersecurity weaknesses should be addressed aggressively in the board room, combined with the proper approach to cyber risk management, implementation of systems and controls against cybersecurity incidents and the leadership of the Chairman of the Board. |
| 1b. | Election of Director: Gregory C. Case | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1c. | Election of Director: Jin-Yong Cai | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1d. | Election of Director: Jeffrey C. Campbell | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1e. | Election of Director: Fulvio Conti | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1f. | Election of Director: Cheryl A. Francis | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1g. | Election of Director: J. Michael Losh | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1h. | Election of Director: Richard C. Notebaert | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F6 Affiliation - Over-tenured director - Member of a Key Board committee According to Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines a director whose tenure on the Board is 10 years or more is considered affiliated, except for diverse nominees. We believe that key Board committees namely Audit, Compensation and Nominating committees should be comprised solely of Independent outside directors for sound corporate governance practice. |
| 1i. | Election of Director: Gloria Santona | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1j. | Election of Director: Byron O. Spruell | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1k. | Election of Director: Carolyn Y. Woo | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Advisory vote to approve the compensation of the Company's named executive officers. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | Ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Resolution.. |
| 4. | Re-appoint Ernst & Young Chartered Accountants as the Company's statutory auditor under Irish law. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST these Resolutions. |
| 5. | Authorize the Board or the Audit Committee of the Board to determine the remuneration of Ernst & Young Ireland, in its capacity as the Company's statutory auditor under Irish law. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST these Resolutions. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 441 | | | | | 0 | | | 14-Jun-2022 | 14-Jun-2022 | |
| SOLAREDGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 83417M104 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | SEDG | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 20-Jun-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US83417M1045 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935630714 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1a. | Election of Director: Betsy Atkins | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1b. | Election of Director: Dirk Hoke | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | Ratification of appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Approval of, on an advisory and non- binding basis, the compensation of our named executive officers (the "Say-on-Pay Proposal"). | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 412 | | | | | 0 | | | 15-Jun-2022 | 15-Jun-2022 | |
| MASTERCARD INCORPORATED | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 57636Q104 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | MA | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 21-Jun-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US57636Q1040 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935635942 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1a. | Election of Director: Merit E. Janow | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1b. | Election of Director: Candido Bracher | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1c. | Election of Director: Richard K. Davis | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1d. | Election of Director: Julius Genachowski | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1e. | Election of Director: Choon Phong Goh | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1f. | Election of Director: Oki Matsumoto | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1g. | Election of Director: Michael Miebach | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1h. | Election of Director: Youngme Moon | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 1i. | Election of Director: Rima Qureshi | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1j. | Election of Director: Gabrielle Sulzberger | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1k. | Election of Director: Jackson Tai | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1l. | Election of Director: Harit Talwar | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1m. | Election of Director: Lance Uggla | | | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: F18 Member of the Compensation Committee and the Company earns a compensation score of Some Concerns or Needs Attention Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines state that the Compensation Committee should be held accountable for such a poor score and should ensure that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture, strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders and necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly qualified executives critical to the Company's long- term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. |
| 2. | Advisory approval of Mastercard's executive compensation. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders cannot support the current compensation policies put in place by the Company's directors. Furthermore, we believe that the Company's compensation policies and procedures are not effective or strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 3. | Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for Mastercard for 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | Approval of an amendment to Mastercard's Certificate of Incorporation to enable adoption of a stockholders' right to call special meetings of stockholders. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that it is in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of at least 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. As such, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 5. | Consideration of a stockholder proposal on the right to call special meetings of stockholders. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that this proposal is consistent with best corporate governance practices and in the best interests of the shareholders to permit holders of at least 10% or more of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| 6. | Consideration of a stockholder proposal requesting Board approval of certain political contributions. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 7. | Consideration of a stockholder proposal requesting charitable donation disclosure. | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 8. | Consideration of a stockholder proposal requesting a report on "ghost guns". | Shareholder | Against | | | Against | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 915 | | | | | 0 | | | 16-Jun-2022 | 16-Jun-2022 | |
| DOLLAR TREE, INC. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | 256746108 | | | | | | | | | Meeting Type | | | | Annual | | | | |
| Ticker Symbol | | | DLTR | | | | | | | | | Meeting Date | | | | 30-Jun-2022 | | | | |
| ISIN | | | | | US2567461080 | | | | | | | | | Agenda | | | | | | 935652001 - Management | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Item | Proposal | | | | | | | | Proposed by | Vote | | Management Recommendation | For/Against Management | For/Against Preferred Provider Recommendation | |
| 1a. | Election of Director: Thomas W. Dickson | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1b. | Election of Director: Richard W. Dreiling | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1c. | Election of Director: Cheryl W. Grisé | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1d. | Election of Director: Daniel J. Heinrich | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1e. | Election of Director: Paul C. Hilal | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1f. | Election of Director: Edward J. Kelly, III | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1g. | Election of Director: Mary A. Laschinger | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1h. | Election of Director: Jeffrey G. Naylor | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1i. | Election of Director: Winnie Y. Park | | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1j. | Election of Director: Bertram L. Scott | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1k. | Election of Director: Stephanie P. Stahl | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 1l. | Election of Director: Michael A. Witynski | | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 2. | To approve, by a non-binding advisory vote, the compensation of the Company's named executive officers. | Management | For | | | For | | | | | For | | | | | For | | | | |
| 3. | To ratify the selection of KPMG LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year 2022. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: The sum total of our evaluation can be found in the Auditor Score we give this auditor. Generally and absent other negative factors, we suggest a score of Neutral or higher. This audit firm has earned a grade of Needs Attention and thus, has failed to pass our model. After taking into account both the quantitative and qualitative measures outlined below, we believe that shareholders should not support the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 4. | To approve the amendment to the Company's Articles of Incorporation. | Management | Against | | | For | | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that the ability of shareholders to call special meetings is increasingly considered an important aspect of good corporate governance however, we belive that the Company should permit holders of at least 10% of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock to call special meetings of shareholders which will strike an appropriate balance between the right of shareholders to call a special meeting and the interests of the Company and its shareholders. After evaluating the details pursuant to the proposal, we recommend a vote AGAINST this Proposal. |
| 5. | A shareholder proposal requesting that the Board issue a report on climate transition planning. | Shareholder | For | | | Against | | | | Against | | | | | For | | | | |
| | | Comments: We believe that setting clear-cut goals will help the Company reduce its regulatory risk related to GHG emissions, financial risk by decreasing volatility of energy prices, and overall expenditure on energy by implementing a disciplined business strategy to cut emissions from its operations. After evaluating the details pursuant to the shareholder proposal and in accordance with the Egan-Jones' Proxy Guidelines, we recommend a vote FOR this Proposal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Account Number | | | Account Name | | Internal Account | | | Custodian | | | Ballot Shares | | | | Unavailable Shares | Vote Date | Date Confirmed | |
| 19-9867 | | | | | | ZIEGLER FAMCO HEDGED EQUITY FUND | ZFHE | | | | U.S. BANK | | | 580 | | | | | 0 | | | 28-Jun-2022 | 28-Jun-2022 | |