UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
| | |
(Mark One) | | |
þ | | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| | For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 |
or |
o | | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| | For the transition period from to |
Commission file number:000-50805
Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
| | |
Maryland | | 20-0138854 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of | | (I.R.S. Employer |
Incorporation or Organization) | | Identification No.) |
2800 Post Oak Boulevard | | |
Suite 5000 | | |
Houston, Texas | | 77056-6118 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
(888) 220-6121
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant:(1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” inRule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined inRule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of May 8, 2007, 110,397,600 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding.
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
| |
Item 1. | Consolidated Financial Statements. |
HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006
(UNAUDITED)
| | | | | | | | |
| | March 31,
| | | December 31,
| |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | (In thousands, except per share amounts) | |
|
ASSETS |
Investment property, at cost: | | | | | | | | |
Buildings and improvements, net | | $ | 746,271 | | | $ | 511,961 | |
In-place leases, net | | | 158,484 | | | | 120,765 | |
Land | | | 239,903 | | | | 165,603 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total investment property | | | 1,144,658 | | | | 798,329 | |
Investment in Hines-Sumisei U.S. Core Office Fund, L.P. | | | 300,439 | | | | 307,553 | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | 50,458 | | | | 23,022 | |
Restricted cash | | | 5,626 | | | | 2,483 | |
Distributions receivable | | | 5,978 | | | | 5,858 | |
Interest rate swap contracts | | | 1,993 | | | | 1,511 | |
Straight-line rent receivable | | | 5,061 | | | | 3,423 | |
Tenant and other receivables | | | 6,714 | | | | 1,749 | |
Acquired above-market leases, net | | | 38,112 | | | | 36,414 | |
Deferred leasing costs, net | | | 17,565 | | | | 17,189 | |
Deferred financing costs, net | | | 5,786 | | | | 5,412 | |
Other assets | | | 2,693 | | | | 10,719 | |
| | | | | | | | |
TOTAL ASSETS | | $ | 1,585,083 | | | $ | 1,213,662 | |
| | | | | | | | |
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | $ | 32,228 | | | $ | 28,899 | |
Unaccepted subscriptions for common shares | | | 1,239 | | | | 2,325 | |
Due to affiliates | | | 6,530 | | | | 8,954 | |
Acquired below-market leases, net | | | 39,709 | | | | 15,814 | |
Other liabilities | | | 5,938 | | | | 4,163 | |
Interest rate swap contracts | | | 6,372 | | | | 5,955 | |
Participation interest liability | | | 14,916 | | | | 11,801 | |
Distributions payable | | | 14,012 | | | | 11,281 | |
Notes payable | | | 689,472 | | | | 481,233 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 810,416 | | | | 570,425 | |
Minority interest | | | 331 | | | | 652 | |
Commitments and Contingencies | | | | | | | | |
Shareholders’ equity: | | | | | | | | |
Preferred shares, $.001 par value; 500,000 preferred shares authorized, none issued or outstanding as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 | | | — | | | | — | |
Common shares, $.001 par value; 1,500,000 common shares authorized as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006; 97,058 and 80,217 common shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively | | $ | 97 | | | $ | 80 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 836,759 | | | | 692,780 | |
Retained deficit | | | (62,726 | ) | | | (50,275 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income | | | 206 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total shareholders’ equity | | | 774,336 | | | | 642,585 | |
| | | | | | | | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | $ | 1,585,083 | | | $ | 1,213,662 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 and 2006
(UNAUDITED)
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | (In thousands, except per share amounts) | |
|
Revenues: | | | | | | | | |
Rental revenue | | $ | 29,356 | | | $ | 8,076 | |
Other revenue | | | 1,319 | | | | 317 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | | | 30,675 | | | | 8,393 | |
Expenses: | | | | | | | | |
Property operating expenses | | | 7,129 | | | | 2,629 | |
Real property taxes | | | 4,736 | | | | 1,012 | |
Property management fees | | | 704 | | | | 209 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 11,558 | | | | 3,046 | |
Asset management and acquisition fees | | | 6,229 | | | | 2,891 | |
Organizational and offering expenses | | | 2,397 | | | | 133 | |
General and administrative expenses | | | 842 | | | | 609 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total expenses | | | 33,595 | | | | 10,529 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Loss before other income (expenses), income tax expense and loss (income) allocated to minority interests | | | (2,920 | ) | | | (2,136 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Other income (expenses): | | | | | | | | |
Equity in losses of Hines-Sumisei U.S. Core Office Fund, L.P. | | | (1,136 | ) | | | (101 | ) |
Gain on derivative instruments, net | | | 639 | | | | — | |
Gain on foreign currency transactions | | | 134 | | | | — | |
Interest expense | | | (9,434 | ) | | | (2,504 | ) |
Interest income | | | 401 | | | | 84 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Loss before income tax expense and minority interests | | | (12,316 | ) | | | (4,657 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Income tax expense | | | (66 | ) | | | — | |
(Income) loss allocated to minority interests | | | (69 | ) | | | 121 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (12,451 | ) | | $ | (4,536 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Basic and diluted loss per common share: | | | | | | | | |
Loss per common share | | $ | (0.14 | ) | | $ | (0.17 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding | | | 88,534 | | | | 26,951 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 and the Year Ended December 31, 2006
(UNAUDITED)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Accumulated
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | Additional
| | | | | | Other
| | | | |
| | Common
| | | | | | Paid-In
| | | Retained
| | | Comprehensive
| | | Shareholders’
| |
| | Shares | | | Amount | | | Capital | | | Deficit | | | Income | | | Equity | |
| | (In thousands) | |
|
BALANCE, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
January 1, 2006 | | | 23,046 | | | $ | 23 | | | $ | 199,846 | | | $ | (11,785 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | 188,084 | |
Issuance of common shares | | | 57,422 | | | | 57 | | | | 581,948 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 582,005 | |
Redemptions of common shares | | | (251 | ) | | | — | | | | (2,341 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (2,341 | ) |
Distributions declared | | | — | | | | — | | | | (29,840 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (29,840 | ) |
Selling commissions and dealer manager fees | | | — | | | | — | | | | (47,220 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (47,220 | ) |
Other offering costs, net | | | — | | | | — | | | | (9,613 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (9,613 | ) |
Net loss | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (38,490 | ) | | | — | | | | (38,490 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
BALANCE, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2006 | | | 80,217 | | | | 80 | | | | 692,780 | | | | (50,275 | ) | | | — | | | | 642,585 | |
Issuance of common shares | | | 16,950 | | | | 17 | | | | 175,401 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 175,418 | |
Redemption of common shares | | | (109 | ) | | | — | | | | (1,019 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (1,019 | ) |
Distributions declared | | | — | | | | — | | | | (13,621 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (13,621 | ) |
Selling commissions and dealer manager fees | | | — | | | | — | | | | (15,046 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (15,046 | ) |
Other offering costs, net | | | — | | | | — | | | | (1,736 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (1,736 | ) |
Comprehensive loss: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (12,451 | ) | | | — | | | | | |
Other comprehensive income — Foreign currency translation adjustment | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 206 | | | | | |
Total comprehensive loss | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (12,245 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
BALANCE, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
March 31, 2007 | | | 97,058 | | | $ | 97 | | | $ | 836,759 | | | $ | (62,726 | ) | | $ | 206 | | | $ | 774,336 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 and 2006
(UNAUDITED)
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
| | (In thousands) | |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (12,451 | ) | | $ | (4,536 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 12,502 | | | | 3,338 | |
Non-cash compensation expense | | | 8 | | | | 8 | |
Equity in losses of Hines-Sumisei U.S. Core Office Fund, L.P. | | | 1,136 | | | | 101 | |
Income (loss) allocated to minority interests | | | 69 | | | | (121 | ) |
Accrual of organizational and offering expenses | | | 2,397 | | | | 133 | |
Gain on foreign currency transactions | | | (134 | ) | | | — | |
Gain on derivative instruments, net | | | (639 | ) | | | — | |
Net change in operating accounts | | | (1,442 | ) | | | 2,458 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | | 1,446 | | | | 1,381 | |
| | | | | | | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | |
Investment in Hines-Sumisei U.S. Core Office Fund, L.P. | | | — | | | | (17,200 | ) |
Distributions received from Hines-Sumisei U.S. Core Office Fund, L.P. in excess of equity in losses | | | 5,858 | | | | 3,598 | |
Investments in property | | | (343,757 | ) | | | (63,295 | ) |
Investments in master leases | | | (4,186 | ) | | | — | |
Master lease rent receipts | | | 396 | | | | — | |
Settlement of foreign currency hedge | | | 939 | | | | — | |
Additions to other assets | | | — | | | | (10,000 | ) |
Increase in restricted cash | | | (3,134 | ) | | | (2,996 | ) |
Increase in acquiredout-of-market leases, net | | | 22,115 | | | | 2,210 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (321,769 | ) | | | (87,683 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | |
(Decrease) increase in unaccepted subscriptions for common shares | | | (1,086 | ) | | | 67 | |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock | | | 168,751 | | | | 89,188 | |
Redemption of common shares | | | (1,019 | ) | | | (63 | ) |
Payments of selling commissions and dealer manager fees | | | (14,524 | ) | | | (6,540 | ) |
Payments of organizational and offering expenses | | | (6,042 | ) | | | (3,000 | ) |
Proceeds from advances from affiliate | | | — | | | | 789 | |
Distributions paid to shareholders and minority interests | | | (4,622 | ) | | | (1,436 | ) |
Proceeds from notes payable | | | 374,415 | | | | 77,000 | |
Payments on notes payable | | | (167,000 | ) | | | (60,900 | ) |
Decrease in security deposit liability, net | | | (6 | ) | | | — | |
Additions to deferred financing costs | | | (764 | ) | | | (1,518 | ) |
Payments related to interest rate swap contracts | | | (366 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by financing activities | | | 347,737 | | | | 93,587 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | | | 22 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | | | 27,436 | | | | 7,285 | |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | | | 23,022 | | | | 6,156 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | | $ | 50,458 | | | $ | 13,441 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements
4
HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 and 2006
(unaudited)
The accompanying interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial information has been prepared according to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted according to such rules and regulations. For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes for the year ended December 31, 2006 included in Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.’s Annual Report onForm 10-K. In the opinion of management, all adjustments and eliminations, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly and in conformity with GAAP the financial position of Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the results of operations and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 have been included. The results of operations for such interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year.
Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (“Hines REIT” and, together with its consolidated subsidiaries, the “Company”), was formed on August 5, 2003 under the General Corporation Law of the state of Maryland for the purpose of engaging in the business of investing in and owning interests in real estate. The Company operates and intends to continue to operate in a manner to qualify as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes. The Company is structured as an umbrella partnership REIT under which substantially all of the Company’s current and future business is and will be conducted through a majority-owned subsidiary, Hines REIT Properties, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”). Hines REIT is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. Subject to certain restrictions and limitations, the business of the Company is managed by Hines Advisors Limited Partnership (the “Advisor”), an affiliate of Hines Interests Limited Partnership (“Hines”), pursuant to the advisory agreement the Company entered into with the Advisor (the “Advisory Agreement”).
Public Offerings
On June 18, 2004, Hines REIT commenced its initial public offering, pursuant to which it offered a maximum of 220 million common shares for sale to the public (the “Initial Offering”). The Initial Offering expired on June 18, 2006. On June 19, 2006, the Company commenced its current public offering (the “Current Offering”), pursuant to which it is offering a maximum of $2.2 billion in common shares.
The following table summarizes the activity from Hines REIT’s offerings for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 and the three months ended March 31, 2007 (in millions):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Initial Public Offering | | | Current Public Offering | | | All Offerings | |
Period | | # of Shares | | | Proceeds | | | # of Shares | | | Proceeds | | | # of Shares | | | Proceeds | |
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004 | | | 2.1 | | | $ | 20.6 | | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | 2.1 | | | $ | 20.6 | |
Year Ended December 31, 2005 | | | 21.0 | (a) | | | 207.7 | (a) | | | — | | | | — | | | | 21.0 | | | | 207.7 | |
Year Ended December 31, 2006 | | | 30.1 | (b) | | | 299.2 | (b) | | | 27.3 | (b) | | | 282.7 | (b) | | | 57.4 | | | | 581.9 | |
Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 | | | — | | | | — | | | | 16.9 | (c) | | | 175.4 | (c) | | | 16.9 | | | | 175.4 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 53.2 | | | $ | 527.5 | | | | 44.2 | | | $ | 458.1 | | | | 97.4 | | | $ | 985.6 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(a) | | Amounts include $2.1 million of gross proceeds relating to approximately 223,000 shares issued under the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan. |
|
(b) | | Amounts include $13.5 million of gross proceeds relating to approximately 1.4 million shares issued under the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan. |
5
HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
| | |
(c) | | Amounts include $6.7 million of gross proceeds relating to approximately 674,000 shares issued under the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan. |
As of March 31, 2007, approximately $1,557.9 million in common shares remained available for sale pursuant to the Current Offering, exclusive of approximately $184.0 million in common shares available under the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan.
Hines REIT contributes all net proceeds from its public offerings to the Operating Partnership in exchange for partnership units in the Operating Partnership. As of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, Hines REIT owned a 97.30% and 97.38%, respectively, general partner interest in the Operating Partnership.
From April 1 through May 8, 2007, Hines REIT received gross offering proceeds of approximately $134.2 million from the sale of 13.0 million common shares, including approximately $8.0 million relating to 807,000 shares sold under Hines REIT’s dividend reinvestment plan. As of May 8, 2007, 1,431.6 million common shares remained available for sale to the public pursuant to the Current Offering, exclusive of 176.0 million common shares available under the dividend reinvestment plan.
Hines 2005 VS I LP, an affiliate of Hines, owned a 1.11% and 1.34% interest in the Operating Partnership as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. As a result of HALP Associates Limited Partnership’s (“HALP”) ownership of the Participation Interest (see Note 6), HALP’s percentage ownership in the Operating Partnership was 1.59% and 1.28% as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively.
As of March 31, 2007, the Company held direct and indirect investments in 24 office properties located in 17 cities throughout the United States and one property in Toronto, Canada. The Company’s interests in 15 of these properties are owned indirectly through the Company’s investment in Hines-Sumisei U.S. Core Office Fund, L.P. (the “Core Fund”). As of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the Company owned an approximate 34.0%non-managing general partner interest in the Core Fund. See Note 3 for further discussion.
On May 1, 2007, an indirect subsidiary of the Core Fund acquired a portfolio of six office properties in Sacramento, California, for approximately $490.2 million. See Note 10 for further discussion.
| |
2. | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
The consolidated financial statements of the Company included in this quarterly report include the accounts of Hines REIT, the Operating Partnership (over which Hines REIT exercises financial and operating control) and the Operating Partnership’s wholly-owned subsidiaries (see Note 3), as well as the related amounts of minority interest. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The Company evaluates the need to consolidate joint ventures based on standards set forth in FASB Interpretation No. 46R,Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities(“FIN 46”) and American Institute of Certified Public Accountants’ Statement of Position78-9,Accounting for Investments in Real Estate Ventures, as amended by Emerging Issues Task Force IssueNo. 04-5,Investor’s Accounting for an Investment in a Limited Partnership When the Investor Is the Sole General Partner and the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights. In accordance with this accounting literature, the Company will consolidate joint ventures that are determined to be variable interest entities for which it is the primary beneficiary. The Company will also consolidate joint ventures that are not determined to be variable interest entities, but for which it exercises control over major operating decisions through substantive participating rights, such as approval of budgets, selection of property managers, asset management, investment
6
HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
activity and changes in financing. As of March 31, 2007, the Company had no unconsolidated interests in joint ventures, other than its interest in the Core Fund.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, which establishes standards for reporting financial and descriptive information about an enterprise’s reportable segments. The Company has determined that it has one reportable segment, with activities related to investing in office properties. The Company’s investments in real estate generate rental revenue and other income through the leasing of office properties, which constituted 100% of the Company’s total consolidated revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2007. The Company’s investments in real estate are geographically diversified and management evaluates operating performance on an individual property level. However, as each of the Company’s office properties has similar economic characteristics, tenants, and products and services, the Company’s office properties have been aggregated into one reportable segment for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006.
The Company reports comprehensive loss in its condensed consolidated statements of shareholders’ equity. Comprehensive loss was $12.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 resulting from the Company’s net loss of 12.5 million offset by its foreign currency translation adjustment of approximately $206,000. See “International Operations” below for additional information.
The Canadian dollar is the functional currency for the Company’s subsidiaries operating in Toronto, Canada. The Company’s subsidiaries have translated their financial statements into U.S. dollars for reporting purposes. Assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate in effect as of the financial statement date. The Company translates income statement accounts using the average exchange rate for the period and significant nonrecurring transactions using the rate on the transaction date. These translation gains or losses are included in accumulated other comprehensive income as a separate component of shareholders’ equity.
The Company’s international subsidiaries may have transactions denominated in currencies other than their functional currency. In these instances, non-monetary assets and liabilities are reflected at the historical exchange rate, monetary assets and liabilities are remeasured into the functional currency at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the period, and income statement accounts are remeasured at the average exchange rate for the period. These gains or losses are included in the Company’s results of operations.
The Company also records gains or losses in the income statement when a transaction with a third party, denominated in a currency other than the entity’s functional currency, is settled and the functional currency cash flows realized are more or less than expected based upon the exchange rate in effect when the transaction was initiated.
Real estate assets the Company owns directly are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method. The estimated useful lives for computing depreciation are generally 10 years for furniture and fixtures,15-20 years for electrical and mechanical installations and 40 years for buildings. Major replacements that extend the useful life of the assets are capitalized. Maintenance and repair costs are expensed as incurred.
Real estate assets are reviewed for impairment if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the individual property may not be recoverable. In such an event, a comparison will be made of the
7
HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
current and projected operating cash flows of each property on an undiscounted basis to the carrying amount of such property. Such carrying amount would be adjusted, if necessary, to estimated fair values to reflect impairment in the value of the asset. At March 31, 2007, management believes no such impairment has occurred.
Acquisitions of properties are accounted for utilizing the purchase method and, accordingly, the results of operations of acquired properties are included in the Company’s results of operations from their respective dates of acquisition. Estimates of future cash flows and other valuation techniques that the Company believes are similar to those used by independent appraisers are used to allocate the purchase price of acquired property between land, buildings and improvements, equipment and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities such as amounts related to in-place leases, acquired above- and below-market leases, tenant relationships, asset retirement obligations and mortgage notes payable. Initial valuations are subject to change until such information is finalized no later than 12 months from the acquisition date.
The estimated fair value of acquired in-place leases are the costs the Company would have incurred to lease the properties to the occupancy level of the properties at the date of acquisition. Such estimates include the fair value of leasing commissions, legal costs and other direct costs that would be incurred to lease the properties to such occupancy levels. Additionally, the Company evaluates the time period over which such occupancy levels would be achieved and includes an estimate of the net market-based rental revenues and net operating costs (primarily consisting of real estate taxes, insurance and utilities) that would be incurred during thelease-up period. Acquired in-place leases as of the date of acquisition are amortized over the remaining lease terms.
Acquired above-and below-market lease values are recorded based on the present value (using an interest rate that reflects the risks associated with the lease acquired) of the difference between the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and management’s estimate of fair market value lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured. The capitalized above- and below-market lease values are amortized as adjustments to rental revenue over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective leases. Should a tenant terminate its lease, the unamortized portion of the in-place lease value is charged to amortization expense and the unamortized portion ofout-of-market lease value is charged to rental revenue.
Management estimates the fair value of assumed mortgage notes payable based upon indications of current market pricing for similar types of debt with similar maturities. Assumed mortgage notes payable are initially recorded at their estimated fair value as of the assumption date, and the difference between such estimated fair value and the note’s outstanding principal balance is amortized over the life of the mortgage note payable.
| |
| Cash and Cash Equivalents |
The Company considers all short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to cash with an original maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.
As of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the Company had restricted cash of approximately $5.6 million and $2.5 million, respectively, related to escrow accounts required by certain of the Company’s mortgage agreements.
Direct leasing costs, primarily consisting of third-party leasing commissions and tenant inducements, are capitalized and amortized over the life of the related lease. Tenant inducement amortization is recorded as an offset to rental revenue and the amortization of other direct leasing costs is recorded in amortization expense.
The Company considers a number of different factors to evaluate whether it or the lessee is the owner of the tenant improvements for accounting purposes. These factors include: 1) whether the lease stipulates how and on
8
HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
what a tenant improvement allowance may be spent; 2) whether the tenant or landlord retains legal title to the improvements; 3) the uniqueness of the improvements; 4) the expected economic life of the tenant improvements relative to the term of the lease; and 5) who constructs or directs the construction of the improvements.
The determination of who owns the tenant improvements for accounting purposes is subject to significant judgment. In making that determination, the Company considers all of the above factors. No one factor is determinative.
Tenant inducement amortization was approximately $420,000 and $130,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and was recorded as an offset to rental revenue. In addition, the Company recorded approximately $134,000 and $8,000 as amortization expense related to other direct leasing costs for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Derivative Instruments
The gain on derivative instruments recorded in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2007 is the result of the following (additional details provided below):
| | |
| • | A gain of approximately $66,000 resulting from the increase in the fair value of the interest rate swaps during the period; |
|
| • | Fees of approximately $366,000 incurred upon entering into the swap transactions; and |
|
| • | A gain of approximately $939,000 resulting from the settlement of a foreign currency contract. |
In June 2006 and December 2006, the Company entered into two forward interest rate swap transactions with HSH Nordbank AG, New York Branch (“HSH Nordbank”). Both swap transactions were entered into as economic hedges against the variability of future interest rates on the Company’s variable interest rate borrowings with HSH Nordbank.
On February 27, 2007, the Company entered into a forward interest rate swap contract with HSH Nordbank with a notional amount of $119.0 million, a10-year term, and an effective date of May 1, 2007. This agreement has effectively fixed the interest rate at 5.355% for the $119.0 million borrowing under the Company’s pooled mortgage facility with HSH Nordbank (the “HSH Credit Facility”) entered into on May 2, 2007. See Note 10 for additional information.
The Company has not designated any of these contracts as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes. The interest rate swaps have been recorded at their estimated fair value in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006.
The Company will mark the interest rate swap contracts to their estimated fair value as of each balance sheet date, and the changes in fair value will be reflected in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.
In addition, on February 8, 2007 the Company entered into a foreign currency contract related to the acquisition of Atrium on Bay, an office property located in Toronto, Canada. The contract was entered into as an economic hedge against the variability of the foreign currency exchange rate related to the Company’s equity investment and was settled at the close of this acquisition on February 26, 2007.
Deferred Financing Costs
Deferred financing costs as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 consist of direct costs incurred in obtaining debt financing (see Note 4). These costs are being amortized into interest expense on a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective interest method, over the terms of the obligations. For the three months ended
9
HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
March 31, 2007 and 2006, approximately $296,000 and $109,000, respectively, was amortized and recorded in interest expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Other Assets
Other assets primarily consists of prepaid insurance, earnest money deposits paid in connection with future property acquisitions and prepaid taxes. Other assets will be amortized to expense or reclassified to other asset accounts upon being put into service in future periods. Other assets includes the following (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | |
| | March 31,
| | | December 31,
| |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
|
Property acquisition escrow deposit | | $ | — | | | $ | 8,858 | |
Prepaid insurance | | | 643 | | | | 353 | |
Prepaid taxes | | | 554 | | | | — | |
Mortgage loan deposits | | | 926 | | | | 924 | |
Other | | | 570 | | | | 584 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 2,693 | | | $ | 10,719 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Unaccepted Subscriptions for Common Shares
Unaccepted subscriptions for common shares includes proceeds related to subscriptions which had not been accepted by the Company as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006.
Due to Affiliates
Due to affiliates includes the following (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | |
| | March 31,
| | | December 31,
| |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
|
Organizational and offering costs related to the Current Offering | | $ | 3,123 | | | $ | 4,992 | |
Dealer manager fees and selling commissions | | | 1,407 | | | | 885 | |
Asset management, acquisition fees and property-level fees and reimbursements | | | 1,872 | | | | 3,077 | |
Other | | | 128 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 6,530 | | | $ | 8,954 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Organizational and Offering Costs
Initial Offering
Certain organizational and offering costs associated with the Initial Offering were paid by the Advisor on behalf of the Company. Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement among Hines REIT, the Operating Partnership and the Advisor during the Initial Offering, the Company was obligated to reimburse the Advisor in an amount equal to the lesser of actual organizational and offering costs incurred related to the Initial Offering or 3.0% of the gross proceeds raised from the Initial Offering.
As of December 31, 2006, the Advisor had incurred on behalf of the Company organizational and offering costs related to the Initial Offering of approximately $43.3 million (of which approximately $23.0 million relates to the Advisor or its affiliates). This amount includes approximately $24.2 million of organizational and internal offering costs, and approximately $19.1 million of third-party offering costs, such as legal and accounting fees and printing costs. No such amounts were incurred subsequent to December 31, 2006.
10
HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
As described above, the Company’s obligation to reimburse the Advisor for organizational and offering costs related to the Initial Offering was limited by the amount of gross proceeds raised from the sale of the Company’s common shares in the Initial Offering. Amounts of organizational and offering costs recorded in the Company’s financial statements in periods prior to the quarter ended June 30, 2006 were based on estimates of gross proceeds to be raised through the end of the Initial Offering period. Such estimates were based on highly subjective factors including the number of retail broker-dealers signing selling agreements with the Company’s Dealer Manager, Hines Real Estate Securities, Inc. (“HRES” or the “Dealer Manager”), anticipated market share penetration in the retail broker-dealer network and the Dealer Manager’s best estimate of the growth rate in sales.
Based on actual gross proceeds raised in the Initial Offering, the total amount of organizational and offering costs for which the Company was obligated to reimburse the Advisor related to the Initial Offering was approximately $16.0 million. As a result of amounts recorded in prior periods, during the three months ended March 31, 2006, organizational and internal offering costs related to the Initial Offering totaling approximately $1.6 million and third party offering costs of approximately $1.9 million were incurred by the Advisor but were not recorded in the condensed consolidated financial statements because the Company expected it would not be obligated to reimburse the Advisor for these costs. Based on the actual proceeds raised in the Initial Offering, the total amount of organizational and offering costs the Company was obligated to reimburse the Advisor related to the Initial Offering was settled in the 2nd quarter of 2006.
The Company commenced the Current Offering on June 19, 2006. Certain organizational and offering costs associated with the Current Offering have been paid by the Advisor on the Company’s behalf. Pursuant to the terms of the Advisory Agreement, the Company is obligated to reimburse the Advisor in an amount equal to the amount of actual organizational and offering costs incurred, so long as such costs, together with selling commissions and dealer-manager fees, do not exceed 15% of gross proceeds from the Current Offering. As of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the Advisor had incurred on the Company’s behalf organizational and offering costs in connection with the Current Offering of $16.7 million and $12.6 million, respectively (of which $7.0 million and $4.7 million, respectively, relates to the Advisor or its affiliates).
During the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, the Advisor incurred approximately $2.4 million and $133,000, respectively, of internal offering costs, which have been expensed in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. Approximately $1.7 million and $280,000 of third-party offering costs for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, have been offset against net proceeds of the Current Offering within additional paid-in capital.
The Company recognizes rental revenue on a straight-line basis over the life of the lease including rent holidays, if any. Straight-line rent receivable in the amount of $5.1 million and $3.4 million as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively, consisted of the difference between the tenants’ rents calculated on astraight-line basis from the date of acquisition or lease commencement over the remaining terms of the related leases and the tenants’ actual rents due under the lease agreements. Revenues associated with tenant reimbursements are recognized in the period in which the expenses are incurred based upon the tenant lease provision. Revenues relating to lease termination fees are recognized at the time that a tenant’s right to occupy the space is terminated and when the Company has satisfied all obligations under the agreement.
The Company commences revenue recognition on its leases based on a number of factors. In most cases, revenue recognition under a lease begins when the lessee takes possession of or controls the physical use of the leased asset. The determination of who is the owner of the tenant improvements for accounting purposes determines the nature of the leased asset and when revenue recognition under a lease begins. If the Company is the owner of the tenant improvements for accounting purposes, then the leased asset is the finished space and revenue recognition
11
HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
begins when the lessee takes possession of the finished space, typically when the improvements are substantially complete. If the Company concludes the lessee is the owner of the tenant improvements for accounting purposes, then the leased asset is the unimproved space and any tenant improvement allowances funded under the lease are treated as lease incentives which reduce revenue recognized over the term of the lease. In these circumstances, the Company begins revenue recognition when the lessee takes possession of the unimproved space to construct their own improvements.
Under the terms of the Employee and Director Incentive Share Plan, the Company grants each independent member of its board of directors 1,000 restricted shares of common stock annually. The restricted shares granted each year fully vest upon completion of each director’s annual term. In accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123®, “Share-Based Payment,” the Company recognizes the expense related to these shares over the vesting period. The Company granted 3,000 restricted common shares to each of its independent board members in November 2004, June 2005 and June 2006. For three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company amortized approximately $8,000 of related compensation expense. Such amounts are included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Hines REIT made an election to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), beginning with its taxable year ended December 31, 2004. In addition, as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 the Company owned an investment in the Core Fund, which has invested in properties through other entities that have elected to be taxed as REITs. Hines REIT’s management believes that the Company and the applicable entities in the Core Fund are organized and operate in such a manner as to qualify for treatment as REITs and intend to operate in the foreseeable future in such a manner so that they will remain qualified as REITs for federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, no provision has been made for U.S. federal income taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.
During 2006, the state of Texas enacted new tax legislation that restructures the state business tax in Texas by replacing the taxable capital and earned surplus components of the current franchise tax with a new “margin tax,” which for financial reporting purposes is considered an income tax under SFAS 109,Accounting for Income Taxes. The impact of this legislation was not material to the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2007.
Due to the acquisition of Atrium on Bay, an office property located in Toronto, Canada, the Company has recorded a provision for Canadian income taxes of approximately $66,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2007 in accordance with Canadian tax laws and regulations.
In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. FIN 48 requires companies to recognize uncertain tax positions in the financial statements if management believes it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the positions. The Company reviewed its current tax positions and believes its positions will be sustained on examination. The adoption of the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
As of March 31, 2007, the Company had no significant temporary differences, tax credits, or net operating loss carry-forwards.
12
HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Loss per common share is calculated by dividing the net loss for each period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during such period. Loss per common share on a basic and diluted basis is the same because the Company has no potentially dilutive common shares outstanding.
| |
3. | Real Estate Investments |
Properties that are wholly owned by the Operating Partnership are referred to as “direct investments.” As of December 31, 2006, the Company owned direct investments in eight office properties through its interest in the Operating Partnership. On January 3, 2007, the Company acquired the Laguna Buildings, a complex of six office buildings located in Redmond, Washington. On February 26, 2007, the Company acquired Atrium on Bay, an office property located in Toronto, Canada. As of March 31, 2007, the Company owned a portfolio of ten direct investments.
As of March 31, 2007, accumulated depreciation and amortization related to direct investments in real estate assets and related lease intangibles were as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Acquired
| | | Acquired
| |
| | Buildings and
| | | | | | Above-Market
| | | Below-Market
| |
| | Improvements | | | In-Place Leases | | | Leases | | | Leases | |
|
Cost | | $ | 758,250 | | | $ | 182,381 | | | $ | 43,259 | | | $ | 44,389 | |
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization | | | (11,979 | ) | | | (23,897 | ) | | | (5,147 | ) | | | (4,680 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net | | $ | 746,271 | | | $ | 158,484 | | | $ | 38,112 | | | $ | 39,709 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As of December 31, 2006, accumulated depreciation and amortization related to direct investments in real estate assets and related lease intangibles were as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Acquired
| | | Acquired
| |
| | Buildings and
| | | In-Place
| | | Above-Market
| | | Below-Market
| |
| | Improvements | | | Leases | | | Leases | | | Leases | |
|
Cost | | $ | 519,843 | | | $ | 137,344 | | | $ | 40,267 | | | $ | 19,046 | |
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization | | | (7,882 | ) | | | (16,579 | ) | | | (3,853 | ) | | | (3,232 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net | | $ | 511,961 | | | $ | 120,765 | | | $ | 36,414 | | | $ | 15,814 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Amortization expense was $7.3 million and $2.1 million forin-place leases for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and amortization ofout-of-market leases, net, was a decrease to rental revenue of approximately $155,000 and $81,000, respectively.
Anticipated amortization of in-place andout-of-market leases, net, for the period from April 1 through December 31, 2007 and for each of the following four years ended December 31 is as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | |
| | In-place
| | | Out-of-Market
| |
| | Leases | | | Leases, net | |
|
April 1 through December 31, 2007 | | $ | 24,095 | | | $ | (1,573 | ) |
2008 | | | 29,927 | | | | (1,762 | ) |
2009 | | | 26,980 | | | | (1,075 | ) |
2010 | | | 20,013 | | | | (1,126 | ) |
2011 | | | 17,873 | | | | (1,204 | ) |
13
HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
In connection with its direct investments, the Company has entered into non-cancelable lease agreements with tenants for office and retail space. As of March 31, 2007, the approximate fixed future minimum rentals for the period from April 1 through December 31, 2007, and each of the years ending December 31, 2008 through 2011 and thereafter are as follows (in thousands):
| | | | |
| | Fixed Future
| |
| | Minimum
| |
| | Rentals | |
|
April 1 through December 31, 2007 | | $ | 68,557 | |
2008 | | | 86,521 | |
2009 | | | 82,156 | |
2010 | | | 64,393 | |
2011 | | | 58,035 | |
Thereafter | | | 168,626 | |
| | | | |
Total | | $ | 528,288 | |
| | | | |
Approximately 10% of the rental revenue recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2007 was earned from a tenant in the software industry, whose lease expires in 2013. No other tenant provided more than 10% of the Company’s total rental revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2007.
Of the total rental revenue earned by the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2006, approximately 13% was earned from a tenant in the insurance industry, whose lease expires in May 2018. In addition, 13% was earned from a tenant in the construction industry, whose leases representing approximately 48% of its space expire in November 2009 and whose remaining leases expire in November 2010. No other tenant provided more than 10% of the Company’s total rental revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2006.
Investment in Hines-Sumisei U.S. Core Office Fund, L.P.
The Core Fund is a partnership organized in August 2003 by Hines to invest in existing office properties in the United States that Hines believes are desirable long-term holdings. The Core Fund owns interests in real estate assets through certain limited liability companies and limited partnerships which have mortgage financing in place.
As of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the Company owned a 34.0% non-managing general partnership interest in the Core Fund, which held ownership interests in fifteen properties across the United States.
Condensed consolidated financial information of the Core Fund as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 and for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 is summarized below (in thousands):
ASSETS
| | | | | | | | |
| | March 31,
| | | December 31,
| |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
|
Cash | | $ | 63,644 | | | $ | 67,557 | |
Property, net | | | 2,493,590 | | | | 2,520,278 | |
Other assets | | | 313,763 | | | | 305,027 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Assets | | $ | 2,870,997 | | | $ | 2,892,862 | |
| | | | | | | | |
14
HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
| | | | | | | | |
Debt | | $ | 1,580,238 | | | $ | 1,571,290 | |
Other liabilities | | | 155,735 | | | | 157,248 | |
Minority interest | | | 333,136 | | | | 341,667 | |
Partners’ capital | | | 801,888 | | | | 822,657 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Liabilities and Partners’ Capital | | $ | 2,870,997 | | | $ | 2,892,862 | |
| | | | | | | | |
OPERATIONS
| | | | | | | | |
| | March 31,
| | | March 31,
| |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
|
Revenues and interest income | | $ | 91,704 | | | $ | 57,018 | |
Operating expenses | | | (41,964 | ) | | | (26,341 | ) |
Interest expense | | | (21,948 | ) | | | (13,073 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization | | | (29,189 | ) | | | (15,617 | ) |
Minority interest | | | (1,800 | ) | | | (2,236 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net Loss | | $ | (3,197 | ) | | $ | (249 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Of the total rental revenue of the Core Fund for the three months ended March 31, 2007, approximately 34% was earned from several tenants in the legal services industry, whose leases expire at various times during the years 2007 through 2027. No tenant provided more than 10% of the Core Fund’s total rental revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2007.
Of the total rental revenue of the Core Fund for the three months ended March 31, 2006, approximately 14% was earned from two affiliated tenants in the oil and gas industry, whose leases expire on December 31, 2015. In addition, 37% was earned from several tenants in the legal services industry, whose leases expire at various times during the years 2007 through 2027. No other tenant provided more than 10% of the Core Fund’s total rental revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2006.
15
HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The following table includes all of the Company’s outstanding notes payable as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 (in thousands, except interest rates):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Principal
| | | Principal
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | Outstanding at
| | | Outstanding at
| |
| | Date
| | | | | | | | | March 31,
| | | December 31,
| |
Description | | Entered Into | | | Maturity Date | | | Interest Rate | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
|
Key Bank National Association — Revolving Credit Facility | | | 9/9/2005 | | | | 10/31/2009 | | | | Variable | (1) | | $ | 107,664 | | | $ | 162,000 | |
SECURED MORTGAGE DEBT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. — Airport Corporate Center | | | 1/31/2006 | | | | 3/11/2009 | | | | 4.775 | % | | | 89,434 | | | | 89,233 | |
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company — 1515 S. Street | | | 4/18/2006 | | | | 5/1/2011 | | | | 5.680 | % | | | 45,000 | | | | 45,000 | |
Capmark Finance, Inc. — Atrium on Bay | | | 2/26/2007 | | | | 2/26/2017 | | | | 5.330 | % | | | 164,374 | (4) | | | — | |
HSH Nordbank — Citymark, 321 North Clark, 1900 and 2000 Alameda | | | 8/1/2006 | | | | 8/1/2016 | | | | 5.8575 | %(2) | | | 185,000 | | | | 185,000 | |
HSH Nordbank — 3400 Data Drive, Watergate Tower IV | | | 1/23/2007 | | | | 1/12/2017 | | | | 5.2505 | %(3) | | | 98,000 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 689,472 | | | $ | 481,233 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | The revolving credit facility with KeyBank National Association (“KeyBank”) provides a maximum aggregate borrowing capacity of $250.0 million, which may be increased to $350.0 million upon the Company’s election. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility are at variable interest rates based on LIBOR plus 125 to 200 basis points based on prescribed leverage ratios. The weighted average interest rate on outstanding borrowings under this facility was 6.70% and 6.73% as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. |
|
(2) | | Borrowings under the pooled mortgage facility with HSH Nordbank have variable interest rates equal to one-month LIBOR plus 0.40%. However, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement which effectively fixed the interest rate of this borrowing at 5.8575%. |
|
(3) | | Borrowings under the pooled mortgage facility with HSH Nordbank have variable interest rates equal to one-month LIBOR plus 0.40%. However, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement which effectively fixed the interest rate of this borrowing at 5.2505%. |
|
(4) | | This amount was translated to U.S. dollars at a rate of $0.8651 as of March 31, 2007. The mortgage agreement provided for a principal amount of $190.0 million CAD. |
On May 2, 2007, the Company borrowed $119.0 million under its HSH Credit Facility as secured financing for the Daytona and Laguna buildings. See Note 10 for further discussion.
From April 1, 2007 to May 8, 2007, the Company repaid all amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility with KeyBank. No new borrowings were made under the KeyBank facility during that period.
The Company’s board of directors began declaring distributions in November 2004, after the Company commenced business operations. The Company has declared distributions monthly and aggregated and paid such distributions quarterly. The Company intends to continue this distribution policy for so long as its board of directors
16
HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
decides this policy is in the best interests of its shareholders. The Company has made the following quarterly distributions to its shareholders and minority interests for the year ended December 31, 2006 and the three months ended March 31, 2007 (in thousands):
| | | | | | |
| | | | Total
| |
Distribution for the Quarter Ended | | Date Paid | | Distribution | |
|
March 31, 2007 | | April 16, 2007 | | $ | 14,012 | |
December 31, 2006 | | January 16, 2007 | | $ | 11,281 | |
September 30, 2006 | | October 13, 2006 | | $ | 9,056 | |
June 30, 2006 | | July 14, 2006 | | $ | 6,405 | |
March 31, 2006 | | April 13, 2006 | | $ | 4,212 | |
| |
6. | Related Party Transactions |
Advisory Agreement
Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, the Company is required to pay the following fees and expense reimbursements:
Acquisition Fees — The Company pays an acquisition fee to the Advisor for services related to the due diligence, selection and acquisition of direct or indirect real estate investments. The acquisition fee is payable following the closing of each acquisition in an amount equal to 0.50% of (i) the purchase price of real estate investments acquired directly by the Company, including any debt attributable to such investments, or (ii) when the Company makes an investment indirectly through another entity, such investment’s pro rata share of the gross asset value of the real estate investments held by that entity. The Advisor earned cash acquisition fees totaling $1.6 million and $1.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, which have been recorded as an expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. See discussion of the Participation Interest below.
Asset Management Fees — The Company pays asset management fees to the Advisor for services related to managing, operating, directing and supervising the operations and administration of the Company and its assets. The asset management fee is earned by the Advisor monthly in an amount equal to 0.0625% multiplied by the net equity capital the Company has invested in real estate investments as of the end of the applicable month. The Advisor earned cash asset management fees totaling approximately $1.5 million and $474,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, which have been recorded as an expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. See discussion of the Participation Interest below.
Expense Reimbursements — In addition to reimbursement of organizational and offering costs (see Note 2), the Company reimburses the Advisor and its affiliates for certain other expenses incurred in connection with the Company’s administration and ongoing operations. For the year ended December 31, 2006, the Advisor had advanced to or made payments on the Company’s behalf totaling $1.6 million and the Company made repayments totaling $2.7 million. No advances were received after June 30, 2006 and no amounts were owed to the Advisor as of March 31, 2007 or December 31, 2006 related to these advances.
The Company has retained HRES, an affiliate of the Advisor, to serve as dealer manager for the Initial Offering and the Current Offering. The dealer manager agreement related to the Initial Offering provided that HRES would earn selling commissions equal to 6.0% of the gross proceeds from sales of common stock sold in the Company’s primary offering and 4.0% of gross proceeds from the sale of shares issued pursuant the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan, all of which was reallowed to participating broker dealers. On May 30, 2006, the Company executed a separate dealer manager agreement for the Current Offering providing that HRES will earn selling
17
HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
commissions equal to 7.0% of the gross proceeds from sales of common stock, all of which is reallowed to participating broker dealers, and will earn no selling commissions related to shares issued pursuant to the dividend reinvestment plan. Both agreements also provide that HRES will earn a dealer manager fee equal to 2.2% of gross proceeds from the sales of common stock other than issuances pursuant to the dividend reinvestment plan, a portion of which may be reallowed to participating broker dealers. HRES earned selling commissions of $11.3 million and $4.9 million and earned dealer manager fees of $3.7 million and $2.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, which have been offset against additional paid-in capital in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of shareholders’ equity.
| |
| Property Management and Leasing Agreements |
The Company has entered into property management and leasing agreements with Hines to manage the leasing and operations of properties in which it directly invests. As compensation for its services, Hines receives the following:
| | |
| • | A property management fee equal to the lesser of 2.5% of the annual gross revenues received from the properties or the amount of property management fees recoverable from tenants of the property under the leases. The Company incurred property management fees of approximately $704,000 and $209,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. As of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the Company had liabilities for incurred and unpaid property management fees of approximately $213,000 and $312,000, respectively, which have been included in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. |
|
| • | A leasing fee of 1.5% of gross revenues payable over the term of each executed lease, including any lease renewal, extension, expansion or similar event and certain construction management and re-development construction management fees, in the event Hines renders such services. The Company incurred leasing, construction management or redevelopment fees of approximately $62,000 and $11,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. As of March 31, 2007 the Company had a related liability of approximately $672,000, which was included in due to affiliates in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. No related liability existed as of December 31, 2006. |
|
| • | The Company generally will be required to reimburse Hines for certain operating costs incurred in providing property management and leasing services pursuant to the property management and leasing agreements. Included in this reimbursement of operating costs are the cost of personnel and overhead expenses related to such personnel who are located at the property as well as off-site personnel located in Hines’ headquarters and regional offices, to the extent the same relate to or support the performance of Hines’s duties under the agreement. However, the reimbursable cost of these off-site personnel and overhead expenses are limited to the lesser of the amount that is recovered from the tenants under their leasesand/or a limit calculated based on the rentable square feet covered by the agreement. The Company incurred reimbursable expenses of approximately $1.3 million and $458,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. As of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the Company had related liabilities of approximately $1.1 million and $498,000, respectively, which were included in due to affiliates in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. |
| |
| The Participation Interest |
Pursuant to the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership, HALP owns a profits interest in the Operating Partnership (the “Participation Interest”). The percentage interest in the Operating Partnership attributable to the Participation Interest was 1.59% and 1.28% as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. The Participation Interest entitles HALP to receive distributions from the Operating Partnership based upon its percentage interest in the Operating Partnership at the time of distribution.
18
HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
As the percentage interest of the participation interest is adjusted, the value attributable to such adjustment related to acquisition fees and asset management fees is charged against earnings and recorded as a liability until such time as the Participation Interest is repurchased for cash or converted into common shares of Hines REIT. This liability totaled $14.9 million and $11.8 million as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively, and is included in the participation interest liability in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The related expense for asset management and acquisition fees of $3.1 million and $1.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, is included in asset management and acquisition fees in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.
| |
7. | Changes in Assets and Liabilities |
The effect of changes in asset and liability accounts on cash flows from operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 is as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
(Increase) decrease in other assets | | $ | (755 | ) | | $ | 58 | |
Increase in straight-line rent receivable | | | (1,636 | ) | | | (149 | ) |
Increase in tenant and other receivables | | | (827 | ) | | | (380 | ) |
Additions to deferred lease costs | | | (1,546 | ) | | | (168 | ) |
Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses | | | 863 | | | | 1,009 | |
Increase in participation interest liability | | | 3,115 | | | | 1,446 | |
Increase in other liabilities | | | 387 | | | | 144 | |
Increase (decrease) in due to affiliates | | | (1,043 | ) | | | 498 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Changes in assets and liabilities | | $ | (1,442 | ) | | $ | 2,458 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
8. | Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures |
Supplemental cash flow disclosures for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 are as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
|
Cash paid for interest | | $ | 9,306 | | | $ | 2,020 | |
Supplemental Schedule of Non-Cash Activities | | | | | | | | |
Unpaid selling commissions and dealer manager fees | | $ | 1,407 | | | $ | 1,495 | |
Deferred offering costs offset against additionalpaid-in-capital | | $ | 1,736 | | | $ | — | |
Distributions declared and unpaid | | $ | 14,012 | | | $ | 4,212 | |
Distributions receivable | | $ | 5,978 | | | $ | 3,115 | |
Distributions reinvested | | $ | 6,659 | | | $ | 1,773 | |
Non-cash net assets acquired upon acquisition of property | | $ | 1,714 | | | $ | 1,675 | |
Accrual of deferred offering costs | | $ | — | | | $ | 280 | |
Assumption of mortgage upon acquisition of property | | $ | — | | | $ | 88,495 | |
Accrued additions to deferred leasing costs | | $ | 792 | | | $ | — | |
Accrued additions to investment property | | $ | 123 | | | $ | — | |
19
HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
| |
9. | Commitments and Contingencies |
On March 27, 2007, the Company entered into a contract to acquire Seattle Design Center, a mixed-use office and retail complex located near the central business district of Seattle, Washington. Seattle Design Center is comprised of a two-story building and a five-story building with an underground parking garage. The buildings consist of 390,684 square feet of rentable area and are 90% leased to a variety of office and retail tenants. The contract purchase price of Seattle Design Center is expected to be approximately $57.0 million, exclusive of transaction costs, financing fees and working capital reserves and the acquisition is expected to close on or about June 22, 2007. There is no guarantee that this acquisition will be consummated, and if the Company elects not to close on Seattle Design Center, it will forfeit $4.0 million in earnest money deposits.
On December 8, 2006, Norwegian Cruise Line (NCL) signed a lease renewal for its space in Airport Corporate Center, an office property located in Miami, Florida. In connection with this renewal, the Company committed to funding approximately $10.4 million of construction costs related to NCL’s expansion and refurbishment of its space, which will be paid in future periods. This amount has been recorded in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2006 and March 31, 2007.
On May 1, 2007, an affiliate of Hines acquired a portfolio of office buildings in Sacramento, California (the “Sacramento Properties”) on behalf of an indirect subsidiary of the Core Fund, as well as certain other properties on behalf of another affiliate of Hines. The Sacramento Properties are comprised of six office properties, which include 15 office buildings located in and around the Sacramento metropolitan area. The Sacramento Properties contain approximately 1.4 million square feet, in aggregate. The contract purchase price of the Sacramento Properties was approximately $490.2 million, exclusive of transaction costs, financing fees and working capital reserves. In connection with this acquisition, an indirect subsidiary of the Core Fund entered into three mortgage agreements with Bank of America in the combined principal amount of $237.3 million and borrowed $36.0 million under its revolving credit facility with KeyBank. The Bank of America loans bear interest at fixed rates of 5.5 – 5.6%, per annum, and have terms of five, seven and ten years. One additional loan is expected to close on or about May 25, 2007 which will be used to repay proceeds borrowed from KeyBank. The loans are secured by the Sacramento Properties. Each mortgage agreement contains customary events of default, with corresponding grace periods, including, without limitation, payment defaults, cross-defaults to other agreements and bankruptcy-related defaults, and customary covenants, including limitations on the incurrence of debt and granting of liens. Neither loan is recourse to the Core Fund or to the Company.
As a result of the Core Fund’s capital call, which was funded on May 1, 2007 and in which the Company elected not to participate, the Company’s interest in the Core Fund was diluted to 29.7%.
On May 2, 2007, the Company borrowed $119.0 million under its HSH Credit Facility. The $119.0 million borrowing is secured by mortgages or deeds of trust and related assignments and security interests on two of the Company’s directly owned properties: The Daytona Buildings and the Laguna Buildings, both of which are located in Redmond, Washington. The borrowing matures on May 2, 2017 and bears interest at a variable rate based onone-month LIBOR plus a margin of 0.40%. The interest rate on such borrowing has been effectively fixed at 5.355% as a result of an interest rate swap agreement the Company entered into with HSH Nordbank.
On May 11, 2007, the Company entered into a contract to acquire 5th and Bell, a six-story office building located in the central business district of Seattle, Washington. The building consists of 197,135 square feet of rentable area and is 84% leased to four tenants. The maximum contract purchase price for 5th and Bell is expected to be $72.2 million, exclusive of transaction costs, financing fees and working capital reserves. This acquisition is expected to close on or about June 29, 2007.
20
HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
In May 2007, the board of directors of the Company authorized the following changes to the terms of its Current Offering, which will become effective on July 1, 2007:
| | |
| • | Increased the offering price of shares of its common stock from $10.40 per share to $10.58 per share |
|
| • | Increased the price at which shares will be issued pursuant to its dividend reinvestment plan from $9.88 per share to $10.05 per share. |
|
| • | Increased the price at which shares will be redeemed under its share redemption plan from $9.36 per share to $9.52 per share. |
On April 13, 2007, subject to the Company’s share redemption plan, the Company authorized requests for the redemption of approximately 122,000 common shares and made payments totaling $1.2 million related to these redemptions. The shares redeemed were cancelled and will have the status of authorized, but unissued shares.
21
| |
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, the notes thereto, and the other unaudited financial data included elsewhere in thisForm 10-Q. The following discussion should also be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements, and the notes thereto, and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
| |
| Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements |
ThisForm 10-Q includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such statements include statements concerning future financial performance and distributions, future debt and financing levels, acquisitions and investment objectives, payments to our advisor, Hines Advisors Limited Partnership (the “Advisor”), and its affiliates and other plans and objectives of management for future operations or economic performance, or assumptions or forecasts related thereto as well as all other statements that are not historical statements. These statements are only predictions. We caution that forward-looking statements are not guarantees. Actual events or our investments and results of operations could differ materially from those expressed or implied in forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by the use of terms such as “may,” “should,” “expect,” “could,” “intend,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “continue,” “predict,” “potential” or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology.
The forward-looking statements included in thisForm 10-Q are based on our current expectations, plans, estimates, assumptions and beliefs that involve numerous risks and uncertainties. Assumptions relating to the foregoing involve judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive and market conditions and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond our control. Any of the assumptions underlying forward-looking statements could be inaccurate. To the extent that our assumptions differ from actual results, our ability to meet such forward-looking statements, including our ability to generate positive cash flow from operations, pay distributions to our shareholders and maintain the value of the real estate properties in which we hold an interest, may be significantly hindered.
The following are some of the risks and uncertainties, although not all of the risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those presented in certain forward-looking statements:
| | |
| • | Our ability to invest offering and dividend reinvestment plan proceeds to acquire properties or other investments in a timely manner and at appropriate amounts that provide acceptable returns; |
|
| • | The potential need to fund tenant improvements,lease-up costs or other capital expenditures, as well as increases in property operating expenses and costs of compliance with environmental matters or discovery of previously undetected environmentally hazardous or other undetected adverse conditions at our properties; |
|
| • | Risks associated with debt; |
|
| • | Competition for tenants and real estate investment opportunities, including competition with affiliates of Hines Interests Limited Partnership (“Hines”); |
|
| • | Risks associated with adverse changes in general economic or local market conditions, including terrorist attacks and other acts of violence, may affect the markets in which we and our tenants operate; |
|
| • | Catastrophic events, such as hurricanes, earthquakes and terrorist attacks; and our ability to secure adequate insurance at reasonable and appropriate rates; |
|
| • | Changes in governmental, tax, real estate and zoning laws and regulations and the related costs of compliance and increases in our administrative operating expenses, including expenses associated with operating as a public company; |
|
| • | Risks relating to our investment in Hines-Sumisei U.S. Core Office Fund, L.P. (the “Core Fund”), such as its reliance on Hines for its operations and investments, and our potential liability for Core Fund obligations; |
22
| | |
| • | The lack of liquidity associated with our assets; |
|
| • | Our reliance on our Advisor, Hines and affiliates of Hines for ourday-to-day operations and the selection of real estate investments, and our Advisor’s ability to attract and retain high-quality personnel who can provide service at a level acceptable to us; |
|
| • | Risks associated with conflicts of interests that result from our relationship with our Advisor and Hines, as well as conflicts of interests certain of our officers and directors face relating to the positions they hold with other entities; and |
|
| • | Our ability to continue to qualify as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes. |
These risks are more fully discussed in, and all forward-looking statements should be read in light of, all of the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements included in thisForm 10-Q. All forward-looking statements are made as of the date of thisForm 10-Q and the risk that actual results will differ materially from the expectations expressed in thisForm 10-Q may increase with the passage of time. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included in thisForm 10-Q, the inclusion of such forward-looking statements should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that the objectives and plans set forth in thisForm 10-Q will be achieved. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by reference to these risks and uncertainties. Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of the particular statement, and we do not undertake to update any forward-looking statement.
Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (“Hines REIT” and, together with its consolidated subsidiaries, “we”, “us” or the “Company”) and its subsidiary, Hines REIT Properties, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”) were formed in August 2003 for the purpose of investing in and owning interests in real estate. We have invested and continue to invest in real estate to satisfy our primary investment objectives of preserving invested capital, paying regular cash distributions and achieving modest capital appreciation of our assets over the long term. We make investments directly through entities wholly owned by the Operating Partnership, or indirectly through other entities, such as through our investment in the Core Fund. As of March 31, 2007, we had direct and indirect interests in 24 office properties located in 17 cities throughout the United States and one property in Toronto, Canada. In addition, we have and may make other real estate investments including, but not limited to, properties outside of the United States, non-office properties, mortgage loans and ground leases. Our principal targeted assets are office properties that have quality construction, desirable locations and quality tenants. We intend to invest in properties which will be diversified by location, lease expirations and tenant industries.
In order to provide capital for these investments, we sold shares to the public through our initial public offering (the “Initial Offering”), which commenced on June 18, 2004 and terminated on June 18, 2006, and we continue to sell common shares through our follow-on public offering of a maximum of $2.2 billion in common shares (the “Current Offering”). We commenced the Current Offering on June 19, 2006, and we intend to continue raising significant amounts of capital through our Current Offering and potential follow-on offerings, as well as through debt financings.
23
The following table provides summary information regarding the properties in which we owned interests as of March 31, 2007:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Leasable
| | | Percent
| | | Our Effective
| |
Property | | City | | Square Feet | | | Leased | | | Ownership(1) | |
|
321 North Clark | | Chicago, Illinois | | | 885,664 | | | | 94 | % | | | 100 | % |
Citymark | | Dallas, Texas | | | 218,096 | | | | 100 | % | | | 100 | % |
Watergate Tower IV | | Emeryville, California | | | 344,433 | | | | 100 | % | | | 100 | % |
Airport Corporate Center | | Miami, Florida | | | 1,018,627 | | | | 95 | % | | | 100 | % |
3400 Data Drive | | Rancho Cordova, California | | | 149,703 | | | | 100 | % | | | 100 | % |
Daytona Buildings | | Redmond, Washington | | | 250,515 | | | | 100 | % | | | 100 | % |
Laguna Buildings | | Redmond, Washington | | | 464,701 | | | | 100 | % | | | 100 | % |
1515 S Street | | Sacramento, California | | | 348,881 | | | | 100 | % | | | 100 | % |
1900 and 2000 Alameda | | San Mateo, California | | | 253,377 | | | | 75 | % | | | 100 | % |
Atrium on Bay | | Toronto, Canada | | | 1,079,870 | | | | 86 | % | | | 100 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total for Directly-Owned Properties | | | 5,013,867 | | | | 93 | % | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
One Atlantic Center | | Atlanta, Georgia | | | 1,100,312 | | | | 82 | % | | | 30.95 | % |
Three First National Plaza | | Chicago, Illinois | | | 1,419,079 | | | | 92 | % | | | 24.76 | % |
333 West Wacker | | Chicago, Illinois | | | 841,621 | | | | 90 | % | | | 24.70 | % |
One Shell Plaza | | Houston, Texas | | | 1,228,160 | | | | 97 | % | | | 15.47 | % |
Two Shell Plaza | | Houston, Texas | | | 566,960 | | | | 94 | % | | | 15.47 | % |
425 Lexington Avenue | | New York, New York | | | 700,034 | | | | 100 | % | | | 13.81 | % |
499 Park Avenue | | New York, New York | | | 288,204 | | | | 100 | % | | | 13.81 | % |
600 Lexington Avenue | | New York, New York | | | 281,072 | | | | 100 | % | | | 13.81 | % |
Riverfront Plaza | | Richmond, Virginia | | | 949,873 | | | | 99 | % | | | 30.95 | % |
525 B Street | | San Diego, California | | | 447,159 | | | | 89 | % | | | 30.95 | % |
The KPMG Building | | San Francisco, California | | | 379,328 | | | | 96 | % | | | 30.95 | % |
101 Second Street | | San Francisco, California | | | 388,370 | | | | 99 | % | | | 30.95 | % |
720 Olive Way | | Seattle, Washington | | | 300,710 | | | | 82 | % | | | 24.70 | % |
1200 19th Street | | Washington, D.C. | | | 234,718 | | | | 100 | % | | | 13.81 | % |
Warner Center | | Woodland Hills, California | | | 808,274 | | | | 98 | % | | | 24.70 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total for Core Fund Properties | | | 9,933,874 | | | | 94 | % | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total for All Properties | | | 14,947,741 | | | | 94 | % | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | This percentage shows the effective ownership of the Operating Partnership in the properties listed. On March 31, 2007, Hines REIT owned a 97.30% interest in the Operating Partnership as its sole general partner. Affiliates of Hines owned the remaining 2.70% interest in the Operating Partnership. We own interests in all of the properties other than those identified above as being owned 100% by us through our interest in the Core Fund, in which we owned an approximate 34.0% non-managing general partner interest as of March 31, 2007. The Core Fund does not own 100% of these buildings; its ownership interest in its buildings ranges from 40.6% to 91.0%. |
In addition, on May 1, 2007, the Core Fund acquired an indirect interest in a portfolio of office buildings in Sacramento, California (the “Sacramento Properties”) through our investment in the Core Fund. As a result of the Core Fund’s capital call, which was funded on May 1, 2007 and in which we elected not to participate, our interest in the Core Fund was diluted to approximately 29.7%. See “Subsequent Events” below for additional information.
As of March 31, 2007, we had primarily invested in institutional-quality office properties in the United States. These types of properties continue to attract significant capital, and competition to acquire such assets remains
24
intense. However, we intend to continue to pursue institutional-quality office properties as well as other real estate investments that we believe will satisfy our long-term primary objectives of preserving invested capital and achieving modest capital appreciation over the long term, in addition to providing regular cash distributions to our shareholders.
We expect to continue to focus primarily on investments in institutional-quality office properties located in the United States (whether as direct investments or as indirect investments through the Core Fund); however, we are expanding our focus to include other real estate investments. In the future, our investments may include additional investments outside of the United States, investments in non-office properties, non-core or development investments, and mortgage loans and ground leases. Additionally, we may invest through joint ventures, including ventures with institutional investorsand/or entities affiliated with Hines.
Critical Accounting Policies
Each of our critical accounting policies involves the use of estimates that require management to make assumptions that are subjective in nature. In addition to the policies set forth below, please see “Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in thisForm 10-Q for a description of some of these policies. Management relies on its experience, collects historical and current market data, and analyzes these assumptions in order to arrive at what it believes to be reasonable estimates. Under different conditions or assumptions, materially different amounts could be reported related to the accounting policies described below. In addition, application of these accounting policies involves the exercise of judgments regarding assumptions as to future uncertainties. Actual results could materially differ from these estimates.
Organizational and Offering Costs
Certain organizational and offering costs related to our public offerings have been paid by our Advisor on our behalf. Organizational and offering costs incurred by our Advisor have been analyzed and segregated between those which are organizational in nature, those which are offering-related salaries and other general and administrative expenses of the Advisor and its affiliates, and those which qualify as offering expenses in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) Topic 5.A,Miscellaneous Accounting — Expenses of Offering. Organizational costs are expensed as incurred in accordance with Statement of Position98-5,Reporting on the Costs ofStart-up Activities. Offering-related salaries and other general and administrative expenses of the Advisor and its affiliates are expensed as incurred, and third-party offering expenses are taken as a reduction against the net proceeds of the offerings within additional paid-in capital in accordance with SAB Topic 5.A. In addition to the offering costs to be paid to the Advisor, selling commissions and dealer manager fees are paid to Hines Real Estate Securities, Inc. (“HRES” or the “Dealer Manager”). Such costs are netted against the net offering proceeds within additionalpaid-in capital as well.
Pursuant to an advisory agreement we entered into with the Advisor during the Initial Offering, we were obligated to reimburse the Advisor in an amount equal to the lesser of actual organizational and offering costs incurred or 3.0% of the gross proceeds raised from the Initial Offering. This agreement expired on June 18, 2006. Organizational and offering costs recorded in our financial statements in prior periods were based on estimates of gross proceeds to be raised through the end of the Initial Offering. Such estimates were based on highly subjective factors, including the number of retail broker-dealers signing selling agreements with our Dealer Manager, anticipated market share penetration in the retail broker-dealer network and the Dealer Manager’s best estimate of the growth rate in sales. At each balance sheet date, management reviewed the actual gross offering proceeds raised to date and management’s estimate of future sales of our common shares through the end of the Initial Offering to determine how much of these costs were expected to be reimbursed to the Advisor, then adjusted the accruals of such costs accordingly.
We commenced the Current Offering on June 19, 2006, and on June 26, 2006, we entered into a new advisory agreement with the Advisor (the “Advisory Agreement”). Certain organizational and offering costs associated with the Current Offering have been paid by the Advisor on our behalf. Pursuant to the terms of our current Advisory Agreement, we are obligated to reimburse the Advisor for the actual organizational and offering costs incurred, so
25
long as such costs, together with selling commissions and dealer-manger fees, do not exceed 15% of gross proceeds from the Current Offering.
| |
| Revenue Recognition and Valuation of Receivables |
We recognize minimum rent revenues on a straight-line basis over the terms of tenant leases, including rent holidays, if any. Revenues associated with tenant reimbursements are recognized in the period in which the expenses are incurred based upon the tenant’s lease provision. Revenues relating to lease termination fees are recognized at the time that the tenant’s right to occupy the space is terminated and when we have satisfied all obligations under the lease. To the extent our leases provide for rental increases at specified intervals, we will record a receivable for rent not yet due under the lease terms. Accordingly, our management must determine, in its judgment, to what extent the unbilled rent receivable applicable to each specific tenant is collectible. We review unbilled rent receivables on a quarterly basis and take into consideration the tenant’s payment history, the financial condition of the tenant, business conditions in the industry in which the tenant operates and economic conditions in the area in which the property is located. In the event that the collectability of unbilled rent with respect to any given tenant is in doubt, we would be required to record an increase in our allowance for doubtful accounts or record a direct write-off of the specific rent receivable, which would have an adverse effect on our net income for the year in which the reserve is increased or the direct writeoff is recorded and would decrease our total assets and shareholders’ equity.
We have entered into interest rate swap transactions in the past as economic hedges against the variability of future interest rates on certain variable interest rate debt. To date, we have not designated any such contracts as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes. The interest rate swaps have been recorded at their estimated fair value in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006. Any changes in the fair value of the interest rate swaps have been recorded in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations for three months ended March 31, 2007.
We will mark the interest rate swaps to their estimated fair value as of each balance sheet date, and the changes in fair value will be reflected in our condensed consolidated statements of operations.
On February 8, 2007 we entered into a foreign currency contract related to the acquisition of Atrium on Bay, an office property located in Toronto, Canada. The contract was entered into as an economic hedge against the variability of the foreign currency exchange rate related to our equity investment and was settled at the close of this acquisition on February 26, 2007. The gain that resulted upon settlement was recorded in gain on derivative instruments, net, in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations.
| |
| Treatment of Management Compensation, Expense Reimbursements and Operating Partnership Participation Interest |
We outsource management of our operations to the Advisor and certain other affiliates of Hines. Fees related to these services are accounted for based on the nature of the service and the relevant accounting literature. Fees for services performed that represent period costs of the Company are expensed as incurred. Such fees include acquisition fees and asset management fees paid to the Advisor and property management fees paid to Hines. In addition to cash payments for acquisition fees and asset management fees paid to the Advisor, an affiliate of the Advisor has received a participation interest, which represents a profits interest in the Operating Partnership related to these services. As the percentage interest of the participation interest is adjusted, the value attributable to such adjustment is charged against earnings, and the participation interest will be recorded as a liability until it is repurchased for cash or converted into common shares of the Company. The conversion and redemption features of the participation interest are accounted for in accordance with the guidance in Emerging Issues Task Force publication (“EITF”)95-7,Implementation Issues Related to the Treatment of Minority Interests in Certain Real Estate Investment Trusts. Redemptions for cash will be accounted for as a reduction to the liability discussed above to the extent of such liability, with any additional amounts recorded as a reduction to equity. Conversions into common shares of the Company will be recorded as an increase to the common shares and additional paid-in capital
26
accounts and a corresponding reduction in the liability discussed above. Redemptions and conversions of the participation interest will result in a corresponding reduction in the percentage attributable to the participation interest and will have no impact on the calculation of subsequent increases in the participation interest.
Hines may perform construction management services for us for both re-development activities and tenant construction. These fees are considered incremental to the construction effort and will be capitalized as incurred in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 67,Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Projects. These costs will be capitalized to the associated real estate project as incurred. Costs related to tenant construction will be depreciated over the estimated useful life. Costs related to redevelopment activities will be depreciated over the estimated useful life of the associated project. Leasing activities are generally performed by Hines on our behalf. Leasing fees are capitalized and amortized over the life of the related lease in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 91,Accounting for Nonrefundable Fees and Costs Associated with Originating or Acquiring Loans and Initial Direct Costs of Leases.
We elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code in conjunction with the filing of our 2004 federal tax return. In addition, we hold an investment in the Core Fund, which has invested in properties through a structure that includes entities that have elected to be taxed as REITs. In order to qualify as a REIT, an entity must meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute at least 90% of its annual ordinary taxable income to shareholders. REITs are generally not subject to federal income tax on taxable income that they distribute to their shareholders. It is our intention to adhere to these requirements and maintain our REIT status, as well as to ensure that the applicable entities in the Core Fund structure also maintain their REIT status. As such, no provision for U.S. federal income taxes has been included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. As a REIT and indirectly through our investment in the Core Fund, we still may be subject to certain state, local and foreign taxes on our income and property and to federal income and excise taxes on our undistributed taxable income. In addition, we are and will indirectly be required to pay federal and state income tax on the net taxable income, if any, from the activities conducted through the taxable REIT subsidiary of the Core Fund.
During 2006, the state of Texas enacted new tax legislation that restructures the state business tax in Texas by replacing the taxable capital and earned surplus components of the current franchise tax with a new “margin tax,” which for financial reporting purposes is considered an income tax under SFAS 109,Accounting for Income Taxes. The impact of this legislation was not material to our results for the three months ended March 31, 2007.
Due to the acquisition of Atrium on Bay, an office property located in Toronto, Canada, we have recorded a provision for Canadian income taxes of approximately $66,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2007 in accordance with Canadian tax laws and regulations.
In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. FIN 48 requires companies to recognize uncertain tax positions in the financial statements if management believes it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. We reviewed our current tax positions and believe our positions will be sustained on examination. The adoption of the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007 did not have a material impact on our financial statements.
As of March 31, 2007, we had no significant temporary differences, tax credits, or net operating loss carry-forwards.
We report comprehensive loss in our condensed consolidated statements of shareholders’ equity. Comprehensive loss was $12.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 resulting from our net loss and offset by our foreign currency translation adjustment. See “International Operations” below for additional information.
27
The Canadian dollar is the functional currency for our subsidiaries operating in Toronto, Canada. Our subsidiaries have translated their financial statements into U.S. dollars for reporting purposes. Assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate in effect as of the financial statement date. We translate income statement accounts using the average exchange rate for the period and significant nonrecurring transactions using the rate on the transaction date. These gains or losses are included in accumulated other comprehensive income as a separate component of shareholders’ equity.
Our international subsidiaries may have transactions denominated in currencies other than their functional currency. In these instances, non-monetary assets and liabilities are reflected at the historical exchange rate, monetary assets and liabilities are remeasured into the functional currency at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the period, and income statement accounts are remeasured at the average exchange rate for the period. These gains or losses are included in our results of operations.
We also record gains or losses in the income statement when a transaction with a third party, denominated in a currency other than the entity’s functional currency, is settled and the functional currency cash flows realized are more or less than expected based upon the exchange rate in effect when the transaction was initiated.
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal cash requirements are for property acquisitions, property-level operating expenses, capital improvements, debt service, organizational and offering expenses, corporate-level general and administrative expenses and distributions. We have three primary sources of capital for meeting our cash requirements:
| | |
| • | proceeds from our public offerings, including our dividend reinvestment plan; |
|
| • | debt financings, including secured or unsecured facilities; and |
|
| • | cash flow generated by our real estate investments and operations. |
For the three months ended March 31, 2007, our cash needs for acquisitions have been met primarily by proceeds from our public equity offerings and debt financing. Our operating cash needs have been met through cash flow generated by our properties and investments. We believe that our current capital resources and cash flow from operations are sufficient to meet our liquidity needs for the foreseeable future.
We raised significant funds from our Current Offering during the first three months of 2007 (see discussion below), and we expect to continue to raise significant funds from our Current Offering and other potential follow-on offerings. We intend to continue making real estate investments with these funds and funds available to us under our credit facilities and other permanent debt. We also intend to continue to pay distributions to our shareholders on a quarterly basis. As noted above, we are currently looking for investment opportunities in an intensely competitive environment, and acquisitions in such an environment may put downward pressure on our distribution payments as a result of potentially lower yields on new investments. Additionally, we have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, delays between raising capital and acquiring real estate investments. We temporarily invest unused proceeds from our public offering in investments that typically yield lower returns when compared to our real estate investments. We may need to use short-term borrowings or advances from affiliates in order to maintain our current per-share distribution levels in future periods. However, we will continue to make investment and financing decisions, and decisions regarding distribution payments, with a long-term view. We will also continually monitor our cash flow and market conditions when making such decisions. In this environment, we may decide to lower our per-share distribution amount rather than take actions we believe may compromise our long-term objectives.
| |
| Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
Our direct investments in real estate assets generate cash flow in the form of rental revenues, which are reduced by debt service, direct leasing costs and property-level operating expenses. Property-level operating expenses consist primarily of salaries and wages of property management personnel, utilities, cleaning, insurance, security
28
and building maintenance costs, property management and leasing fees, and property taxes. Additionally, we have incurred corporate-level debt service, general and administrative expenses, asset management and acquisition fees. Results of operations are not directly comparable for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 as a result of our acquisition activity. As of March 31, 2007, we owned ten properties, which generated revenue of $30.7 million for the three months then ended. By comparison, we owned four properties as of March 31, 2006, which generated revenue of $8.4 million for the three months then ended.
Net cash flow provided by operating activities was $1.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006. Our operating net cash flows are primarily the result of the net loss for the period offset by non-cash components of our net loss such as depreciation and amortization, equity in losses of the Core Fund, accrued costs of our Current Offering, and changes in other asset and liability accounts.
| |
| Cash Flows from Investing Activities |
During the three months ended March 31, 2007, we acquired two office properties for $321.6 million in the aggregate, excluding transaction costs, financing fees and working capital reserves. This represents over a four-fold increase over the three months ended March 31, 2006, during which we acquired one office property for $61.1 million, excluding transaction costs, financing fees and working capital reserves.
During the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, we received distributions related to our interest in the Core Fund of approximately $5.9 million and $3.6 million, respectively. The increase in distributions are attributable to our interest in the Core fund following additional capital contributions we made to the Core Fund since March 31, 2006, as well as the increased cash flow at the Core Fund resulting from the additional properties it has acquired since March 31, 2006.
During the three months ended March 31, 2006, we made capital contributions to the Core Fund totaling $17.2 million. We made no capital contributions to the Core Fund during the three months ended March 31, 2007.
During the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, we had increases in restricted cash of approximately $3.1 million and $3.0 million, respectively, related to certain escrows required by our mortgage agreements.
During the three months ended March 31, 2006, we paid a deposit of $10.0 million related to the acquisition of 321 N. Clark in April 2006. No such deposits were paid and outstanding during the three months ended March 31, 2007.
During the three months ended March 31, 2007, we had net cash outflows of $3.8 million for master leases entered into in connection with our acquisitions of the Laguna Buildings and Atrium on Bay.
| |
| Cash Flows from Financing Activities |
We offer shares of our common stock for sale to the public, which provides us with the ability to raise capital on a continual basis. The Initial Offering commenced on June 18, 2004 and terminated on June 18, 2006. On June 19, 2006, we commenced our Current Offering, pursuant to which we are offering a maximum of $2.2 billion in common shares.
29
The following table summarizes the activity from our offerings for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 and the three months ended March 31, 2007 (in millions):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Initial Public Offering | | | Current Public Offering | | | All Offerings | |
Period | | # of Shares | | | Proceeds | | | # of Shares | | | Proceeds | | | # of Shares | | | Proceeds | |
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004 | | | 2.1 | | | $ | 20.6 | | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | 2.1 | | | $ | 20.6 | |
Year Ended December 31, 2005 | | | 21.0 | (a) | | | 207.7 | (a) | | | — | | | | — | | | | 21.0 | | | | 207.7 | |
Year Ended December 31, 2006 | | | 30.1 | (b) | | | 299.2 | (b) | | | 27.3 | (b) | | | 282.7 | (b) | | | 57.4 | | | | 581.9 | |
Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 | | | — | | | | — | | | | 16.9 | (c) | | | 175.4 | (c) | | | 16.9 | | | | 175.4 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 53.2 | | | $ | 527.5 | | | | 44.2 | | | $ | 458.1 | | | | 97.4 | | | $ | 985.6 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(a) | | Amounts include $2.1 million of gross proceeds relating to approximately 223,000 shares issued under our dividend reinvestment plan. |
|
(b) | | Amounts include $13.5 million of gross proceeds relating to 1.4 million shares issued under our dividend reinvestment plan. |
|
(c) | | Amounts include $6.7 million of gross proceeds relating to approximately 674,000 shares issued under our dividend reinvestment plan. |
As of March 31, 2007, $1,557.9 million in common shares remained available for sale pursuant to our Current Offering, exclusive of $184.0 million in common shares available under our dividend reinvestment plan. From April 1 through May 8, 2007, we received gross offering proceeds of approximately $134.2 million from the sale of 13.0 million common shares, including approximately $8.0 million relating to 807,000 shares sold under our dividend reinvestment plan. As of May 8, 2007, 1,431.6 million common shares remained available for sale to the public pursuant to the Current Offering, exclusive of 176.0 million common shares available under our dividend reinvestment plan.
| |
| Payment of Offering and Other Costs and Expenses |
In addition to making investments in accordance with our investment objectives, we use our capital resources to pay our Dealer Manager and our Advisor for services they provide to us during the various phases of our organization and operations. During the offering stage, we pay the Dealer Manager selling commissions and dealer manager fees, and we reimburse the Advisor for organizational and offering costs.
For the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, we paid the Dealer Manager selling commissions of $10.9 million and $4.5 million, respectively, and we paid Dealer Manager fees of $3.6 million and $2.0 million, respectively. All such selling commissions and a portion of such Dealer Manager fees were reallowed by HRES to participating broker dealers for their services in selling our shares.
During the three months ended March 31, 2006, the Advisor incurred organizational and internal offering costs related to the Initial Offering totaling $1.6 million and third-party offering costs of $1.9 million. These costs were not recorded in the condensed consolidated financial statements because the Company expected it would not be obligated to reimburse the Advisor for these costs. During the three months ended March 31, 2006, we made payments totaling $3.0 million to our Advisor for the reimbursement of previously incurred Initial Offering organizational and offering costs. No such costs were incurred or paid during the three months ended March 31, 2007 because the Initial Offering had concluded.
During the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, the Advisor incurred organizational and internal offering costs related to the Current Offering totaling approximately $2.4 million and $133,000, respectively, and third-party offering costs of approximately $1.7 million and $280,000, respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2007, we made payments totaling $6.0 million to our Advisor for reimbursement of Current Offering organizational and offering costs. No such payments were made during the three months ended March 31, 2006 since the Current Offering had not yet begun.
See “Critical Accounting Policies — Organizational and Offering Costs” above for additional information.
30
We use debt financing from time to time for acquisitions and investments as well as for property improvements, tenant improvements, leasing commissions and other working capital needs. We may obtain financing at the time an asset is acquired or an investment is made or at such later time as determined to be appropriate, depending on market conditions and other factors.
Subject to market conditions and other factors we may consider, we expect that our debt financing will generally be in the range of approximately 40 – 60% of management’s estimate of the aggregate value of our real estate investments. The amount of debt we place on an individual property, or the amount of debt incurred by an individual entity in which we invest, however, may be less than 40% or more than 60% of the value of such property or the value of the assets owed by such entity, depending on market conditions and other factors. In addition, depending on market conditions and other factors, we may choose not to use debt financing for our operations or to acquire properties. Our articles of incorporation limit our borrowing to 300% of our net assets (equivalent to 75% of the cost of our assets) unless any excess borrowing is approved by a majority of our independent directors and is disclosed to our shareholders in our next quarterly report. As of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, our debt financing was approximately 52% and 53%, respectively, of the aggregate value of our real estate investments (including our pro rata share of the Core Fund’s real estate assets and related debt).
The following table includes all of the Company’s outstanding notes payable as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 (in thousands, except interest rates):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Principal
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | Principal
| | | Outstanding at
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | Outstanding at
| | | December 31,
| |
Description | | Date Entered Into | | | Maturity Date | | | Interest Rate | | | March 31, 2007 | | | 2006 | |
|
Key Bank National Association — Revolving Credit Facility | | | 9/9/2005 | | | | 10/31/2009 | | | | Variable(1 | ) | | $ | 107,664 | | | $ | 162,000 | |
SECURED MORTGAGE DEBT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. — Airport Corporate Center | | | 1/31/2006 | | | | 3/11/2009 | | | | 4.775 | % | | | 89,434 | | | | 89,233 | |
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company — 1515 S. Street | | | 4/18/2006 | | | | 5/1/2011 | | | | 5.680 | % | | | 45,000 | | | | 45,000 | |
Capmark Finance, Inc. — Atrium on Bay | | | 2/26/2007 | | | | 2/26/2017 | | | | 5.330 | % | | | 164,374 | (4) | | | — | |
HSH POOLED MORTGAGE FACILITY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
HSH Nordbank — Citymark, 321 North Clark, 1900 and 2000 Alameda | | | 8/1/2006 | | | | 8/1/2016 | | | | 5.8575 | %(2) | | | 185,000 | | | | 185,000 | |
HSH Nordbank — 3400 Data Drive, Watergate Tower IV | | | 1/23/2007 | | | | 1/12/2017 | | | | 5.2505 | %(3) | | | 98,000 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 689,472 | | | $ | 481,233 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | The revolving credit facility with KeyBank National Association (“KeyBank”) provides a maximum aggregate borrowing capacity of $250.0 million, which may be increased to $350.0 million upon the Company’s election. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility are at variable interest rates based on LIBOR plus 125 to 200 basis points based on prescribed leverage ratios. The weighted average interest rate on outstanding borrowings was 6.70% and 6.73% as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. |
31
| | |
(2) | | This borrowing under the pooled mortgage facility with HSH Nordbank has a variable interest rate equal toone-month LIBOR plus 0.40%. However, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement which effectively fixed the interest rate of this borrowing at 5.8575%. |
|
(3) | | This borrowing under the pooled mortgage facility with HSH Nordbank has a variable interest rate equal toone-month LIBOR plus 0.40%. However, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement which effectively fixed the interest rate of this borrowing at 5.2505%. |
|
(4) | | This amount was translated to U.S. dollars at a rate of $0.8651 as of March 31, 2007. The mortgage agreement contained a principal amount of $190.0 million CAD. |
From April 1, 2007 to May 8, 2007, we repaid all amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility with KeyBank. No new borrowings were made under the KeyBank facility during that period.
On May 2, 2007, we borrowed $119.0 million under the HSH Credit Facility as secured financing for the Daytona and Laguna buildings. See “Subsequent Events” below for additional information regarding this borrowing.
Certain costs and expenses associated with our organization and public offerings have been paid by our Advisor on our behalf. See “Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources — Payment of Offering Costs and Other Expenses” above for a discussion of these advances and our repayment of the same.
During the three months ended March 31, 2006, our Advisor had advanced to us or made payments on our behalf totaling approximately $789,000. We did not receive any advances from our Advisor after June 30, 2006, and as of December 31, 2006, we had repaid our Advisor all amounts related to these advances.
To the extent that our operating expenses in any four consecutive fiscal quarters exceed the greater of 2% of average invested assets or 25% of Net Income (as defined in our Articles of Incorporation), our Advisor is required to reimburse us the amount by which the total operating expenses paid or incurred exceed the greater of the 2% or 25% threshold, unless our independent directors determine that such excess was justified. For the four quarters ended March 31, 2007, we did not exceed this limitation.
In order to meet the requirements for being treated as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and to pay regular cash distributions to our shareholders, which is one of our investment objectives, we have and intend to continue to declare distributions to shareholders as of daily record dates and aggregate and pay such distributions quarterly.
From January 1, 2006 through June 30, 2006, our board of directors declared distributions equal to $0.00164384 per share, per day. From July 1, 2006 through March 31, 2007, our board of directors declared distributions equal to $0.00170959 per share, per day. Additionally, our board of directors has declared distributions equal to $0.00170959 per share, per day through May 31, 2007. The distributions declared were set by our board of directors at a level the board believed to be appropriate based upon the board’s evaluation of our assets, historical and projected levels of cash flow and results of operations, additional capital and debt anticipated to be raised or incurred and invested in the future, the historical and projected timing between receiving offering proceeds and investing such proceeds in real estate investments, and general market conditions and trends.
Aggregate distributions declared to our shareholders and minority interests related to the three months ended March 31, 2007 were approximately $14.0 million. Our two primary sources of funding for our distributions are cash flows from operating activities and distributions from the Core Fund. When analyzing the amount of cash flow available to pay distributions, we also consider the impact of certain other factors, including our practice of financing acquisition fees and other acquisition-related cash flows, which reduce cash flows from operating activities in our statements of cash flows. The following table summarizes the primary sources and other factors we
32
considered in our analysis of cash flows available to fund distributions to shareholders and minority interests (amounts are in thousands for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and are approximate):
| | | | |
Cash flow from operating activities | | $ | 1,446 | |
Distributions from the Core Fund(1) | | $ | 5,978 | |
Cash acquisition fees(2) | | $ | 3,452 | |
Acquisition-related items(3) | | $ | 4,283 | |
Master lease rent receipts(4) | | $ | 396 | |
| | |
(1) | | Cash distributions earned during the three months ended March 31, 2007 related to our investment in the Core Fund. |
|
(2) | | In accordance with GAAP, acquisition fees paid to our Advisor reduce cash flows from operating activities in our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. However, we fund such payments with offering proceeds and related acquisition indebtedness as such payments are transaction costs associated with our acquisitions of real estate investments. As a result, we considered the payment of acquisition fees in our analysis of cash flow available to pay distributions. |
|
(3) | | Acquisition-related items include cash payments to settle net liabilities assumed upon acquisition of properties. In accordance with GAAP, these payments reduce cash flows from operating activities in our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. However, these payments are related to the acquisition, as opposed to the operations, of these properties, and we fund such payments with offering proceeds and acquisition-related indebtedness. As a result, we considered the payment of these items in our analysis of cash flow available to pay distributions. For the three months ended March 31, 2007, these amounts consisted primarily of property tax liabilities assumed upon the acquisition of 321 North Clark. |
|
(4) | | Master lease rent receipts include rent payments received related to master leases entered into in conjunction with previous asset acquisitions. In accordance with GAAP, these payments are recorded in cash flows from investing activities in our condensed consolidated statement of cash flows. However, we consider these cash receipts in our analysis of cash flow available to pay distributions. |
Additionally, we typically use cash flows from financing activities such as offering proceeds or borrowings, rather than operating cash flows, to pay for deferred leasing costs, such as tenant incentive payments, leasing commissions and tenant improvements as we consider these costs to be additional capital investments in our properties. For the three months ended March 31, 2007, we paid $1.5 million for deferred leasing costs, which were reflected as a reduction of cash flows from operating activities in our condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in thisForm 10-Q.
As noted above in “— General”, we are currently making real estate investments in an intensely competitive environment. Significant U.S. and foreign investment capital continues to flow into real estate capital markets, creating increased competition for acquisitions and continued upward pressure on prices of real estate investments, including high-quality office properties. Should this trend continue, which we expect it may, it will likely cause downward pressure on rates of return from our future real estate investments, and consequently, could cause downward pressure on the distributions payable to our shareholders.
To the extent our distributions exceed our tax-basis earnings and profits, a portion of these distributions will constitute a return of capital for federal income tax purposes. Approximately 23% of our distributions paid during the year ended December 31, 2006 were taxable to shareholders as ordinary taxable income and the remaining portion was treated as return of capital. We expect that a portion of distributions paid in future years will also constitute a return of capital for federal income tax purposes, primarily as a result of non-cash depreciation deductions.
As of March 31, 2007, we owned ten office properties directly and had invested $337.6 million in the Core Fund, which owned interests in 15 office properties. As of March 31, 2006, we owned four office properties directly and had invested $145.4 million in the Core Fund, which owned interests in eight office properties. As a result of the
33
significant new investments made between March 31, 2006 and March 31, 2007, as well as the number of our direct properties owned for the entire three month periods then ended, our results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 are not directly comparable.
Our results of operations are also not indicative of what we expect our results of operations will be in future periods as we expect that our operating revenues and expenses will continue to increase as a result of (i) owning the real estate investments we acquired during the last 12 months for an entire period, and (ii) our future real estate investments, which we expect to be substantial.
Total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 were $30.7 million and $8.4 million, respectively. Property-level expenses, property taxes and property management fees for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 were $12.6 million and $3.9 million, respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 was $11.6 million and $3.0 million, respectively.
| |
| Our Interest in the Core Fund |
As of March 31, 2007, we had invested a total of approximately $337.6 million and owned a 34.0%non-managing general partner interest in the Core Fund, compared to $145.4 million invested as of March 31, 2006, representing a 27.4% interest.
Our equity in losses related to our investment in the Core Fund for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 was approximately $1.1 million and $101,000, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, the Core Fund had net losses of approximately $3.2 million and $249,000, respectively, on revenues of $91.2 million and $56.8 million, respectively. The Core Fund’s net losses for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 included $29.2 million and $15.6 million, respectively, of non-cash depreciation and amortization expenses.
| |
| Asset Management and Acquisition Fees |
Asset management fees for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 were approximately $2.9 million and $948,000, respectively. The increase in asset management fees reflects the fact that we have a larger portfolio of assets under management. Acquisition fees for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 were $3.3 million and $1.9 million, respectively. The increase compared to the prior year is attributable to an increase in investment activity during the applicable period in 2007.
These amounts include both the cash portion of the fees payable to our Advisor as well as the corresponding increase in the Participation Interest. See “Note 6 — Related Party Transactions” in our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in thisForm 10-Q for a description of the Participation Interest.
| |
| General, Administrative and Other Expenses |
General and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 were approximately $842,000 and $609,000, respectively. These costs include legal and accounting fees, insurance costs, costs and expenses associated with our board of directors and other administrative expenses. Certain of these costs are variable and may increase in the future as we continue to raise capital and make additional real estate investments. The increase in general and administrative expenses during the three months ended March 31, 2007 are primarily due to increased costs of shareholder communications and audit fees as the Company’s activities and shareholder base continue to grow.
| |
| Gain on Derivative Instruments |
We entered into interest rate swap contracts with HSH Nordbank in June 2006, December 2006 and February 2007.
34
The gain on derivative instruments recorded in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2007 is the result of the following (additional details provided below):
| | |
| • | A gain of approximately $66,000 resulting from the increase in the fair value of the interest rate swaps during the period; |
|
| • | Fees of approximately $366,000 incurred upon entering into the swap transactions; and |
|
| • | A gain of approximately $939,000 resulting from the settlement of a foreign currency contract. |
On February 8, 2007, we entered into a foreign currency contract related to the acquisition of Atrium on Bay, an office property located in Toronto, Canada. The contract was entered into as an economic hedge against the variability of the foreign currency exchange rate related to our equity investment and was settled at the close of this acquisition on February 26. 2007. The gain upon settlement of approximately $939,000 has been recorded in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations.
| |
| Gain on Foreign Currency Transaction |
During the three months ended March 31, 2007, certain of our subsidiaries which own Atrium on Bay, our property located in Toronto, Canada, had transactions denominated in currencies other than their functional currency (CAD). In these instances, non-monetary assets and liabilities are reflected at the historical exchange rate, monetary assets and liabilities are remeasured into the functional currency at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the period, and income statement accounts are remeasured at the average exchange rate for the period. These gains are included in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations.
Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 was approximately $9.4 million and $2.5 million, respectively. The increase in interest expense is primarily due to increased borrowings related to our acquisitions of directly-owned properties.
Interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 was approximately $401,000 and $84,000, respectively. The increase in interest income is primarily due to increased cash we held in short-term investments.
| |
| Loss Allocated to Minority Interests |
As of March 31, 2007 and 2006, Hines REIT owned a 97.30% and a 95.36% interest, respectively, in the Operating Partnership, and affiliates of Hines owned the remaining 2.70% and 4.64% interests, respectively. We allocated income of approximately $69,000 to minority interests for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and losses of $121,000 to minority interests for the three months ended March 31, 2006.
| |
| Related-Party Transactions and Agreements |
We have entered into agreements with the Advisor, Dealer Manager and Hines or its affiliates, whereby we pay certain fees and reimbursements to these entities, including acquisition fees, selling commissions, dealer-manager fees, asset and property management fees, construction management fees, reimbursement of organizational and offering costs, and reimbursement of certain operating costs. See “Note 6 — Related Party Transactions” in our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in thisForm 10-Q for a discussion of the various related-party transactions, agreements and fees.
35
| |
| Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements |
As of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
On April 13, 2007, subject to our share redemption plan, we authorized requests for the redemption of approximately 122,000 common shares and made payments totaling $1.2 million related to these redemptions. The shares redeemed were cancelled and will have the status of authorized, but unissued shares.
On May 1, 2007, an affiliate of Hines acquired a portfolio of office buildings in Sacramento, California on behalf of an indirect subsidiary of the Core Fund, as well as certain other properties on behalf of another affiliate of Hines. The Sacramento Properties are comprised of six office properties, which include 15 office buildings located in and around the Sacramento metropolitan area. The Sacramento Properties contain approximately 1.4 million square feet, in aggregate. The contract purchase price of the Sacramento Properties was approximately $490.2 million, exclusive of transaction costs, financing fees and working capital reserves. In connection with this acquisition, an indirect subsidiary of the Core Fund entered into three mortgage agreements with Bank of America in the combined principal amount of $237.3 million and borrowed $36.0 million under its revolving credit facility with KeyBank. The Bank of America loans bear interest at fixed rates of 5.5 — 5.6%, per annum, and have terms of five, seven and ten years. One additional loan is expected to close on or about May 25, 2007 which will be used to repay proceeds borrowed from KeyBank. The loans are secured by the Sacramento Properties. Each mortgage agreement contains customary events of default, with corresponding grace periods, including, without limitation, payment defaults, cross-defaults to other agreements and bankruptcy-related defaults, and customary covenants, including limitations on the incurrence of debt and granting of liens. Neither loan is recourse to the Core Fund or to us.
On May 2, 2007, we borrowed $119.0 million under our HSH Credit Facility. The borrowing was used to repay amounts owed under our existing credit facility with KeyBank. The $119.0 million borrowing is secured by mortgages or deeds of trust and related assignments and security interests on two of our directly owned properties: The Daytona Buildings and the Laguna Buildings, both of which are located in Redmond, Washington. The subsidiaries that directly own such properties are the borrowers under the loan documents. The borrowing matures on May 2, 2017 and bears interest at a variable rate based on one-month LIBOR plus a margin of 0.40%. The interest rate on such borrowing has been effectively fixed at 5.355% as a result of an interest rate swap agreement we entered into with HSH Nordbank.
On May 11, 2007, we entered into a contract to acquire 5th and Bell, a six-story office building located in the central business district of Seattle, Washington. The building consists of 197,135 square feet of rentable area and is 84% leased to four tenants. The maximum contract purchase price for 5th and Bell is expected to be $72.2 million, exclusive of transaction costs, financing fees and working capital reserves. We expect acquisition to close on or about June 29, 2007.
| |
| Changes to Our Current Offering |
As described in the Prospectus for our Current Offering, our board of directors may in its discretion from time to time change the offering price of our common shares and, therefore, the number of shares being offered in our Current Offering. Our board of directors has approved an increase to the offering price, the price at which we intend to issue shares under our dividend reinvestment plan and the price at which we intend to redeem shares under our share redemption program. These prices will be increased as follows:
| | |
| • | Effective July 1, 2007, we will offer shares to the public pursuant to our Current Offering at a price of $10.58 per share. |
|
| • | Effective July 1, 2007, participants in our dividend reinvestment plan will acquire shares at a fixed price of $10.05 per share rather than at the current price of $9.88 per share. Therefore, we expect that shares issued under the plan in connection with distributions previously declared for April and May 2007, and (if declared) |
36
| | |
| | June 2007, which will be aggregated and paid in July 2007, will be issued at this revised price of $10.05 per share |
| | |
| • | Effective July 1, 2007, shares redeemed under our share redemption program will be redeemed at a price of $9.52 per share rather than at our current redemption price of $9.36 per share. |
The determination of these prices by our board of directors is subjective and was primarily based on (i) the estimated per-share net asset value of the Company as determined by our management, plus (ii), in the case of our offering price, the commissions, dealer manager fee and estimated costs associated with our Current Offering. Our management estimated the per-share net asset value of the Company using appraised values of our real estate assets as of March 31, 2007 which were determined by independent third party appraisers, as well as estimates of the values of our other assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2006, and then making various adjustments and estimations in order to account for our operations and other factors occurring or expected to occur between December 31, 2006 and July 1, 2007. In addition, our board of directors also considered our historical and anticipated results of operations and financial condition, our current and anticipated distribution payments, yields and offering prices of other real estate companies substantially similar to us, our current and anticipated capital and debt structure, and our management’s and Advisor’s recommendations and assessment of our prospects and expected execution of our investment and operating strategies.
Both our real estate appraisals and the methodology utilized by our management in estimating our per-share net asset value were based on a number of assumptions and estimates which may not be accurate or complete. No liquidity discounts or discounts relating to the fact that we are currently externally managed were applied to our estimated per-share valuation, and no attempt was made to value Hines REIT as an enterprise. Likewise, the valuation was not reduced by potential selling commissions or other costs of sale, which would impact proceeds in the case of a liquidation. The offering price and the redemption price may not be indicative of the price our shareholders would receive if our shares were actively traded or if we were liquidated. Moreover, since the estimated per-share net asset value of the Company was increased by certain fees and costs associated with our Current Offering in connection with setting the new offering price of our shares, the proceeds received from a liquidation of our assets would likely be substantially less than the offering price of our shares.
Our last offering price change occurred in June 2006, and our board of directors declared an increasedper-share distribution amount in July 2006. Although our management and board of directors review and assess our per-share distribution amount on a periodic basis, our management currently expects that we will not increase our current per-share distribution amount in the near term notwithstanding the offering price increase described above. Therefore, investors should not expect an increased per-share distribution amount in July 2007 when the new offering price goes into effect.
Except for the price at which we will issue our shares under this offering and, therefore, the number of shares being offered by the Prospectus, no other terms of the offering described in the “Plan of Distribution” section of the Prospectus have changed.
| |
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. |
Market risk includes risks relating to changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices and other market changes that affect market sensitive instruments. We are exposed to both interest rate risk and foreign currency exchange rate risk.
We are exposed to the effects of interest rate changes primarily through variable-rate debt, which we use to maintain liquidity and fund expansion of our real estate investment portfolio and operations. Our interest rate risk management objectives are to monitor and manage the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows, and to use derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps and caps in order to mitigate our interest rate risk on variable rate debt. We do not enter into derivative or interest rate transactions for speculative purposes.
As of March 31, 2007, we had $283.0 million of debt outstanding under our HSH Credit Facility, which is a variable-rate pooled mortgage facility. However, as a result of the interest rate swap agreements entered into with HSH Nordbank, these borrowings effectively bear interest at fixed rates. The HSH Credit Facility provides that we must purchase interest-rate protection for any future borrowings under the facility.
37
Our total variable-rate debt outstanding as of March 31, 2007 consisted of $107.7 million in borrowings under our revolving credit facility with KeyBank. This debt is subject to a variable rate through its maturity date on October 31, 2009. An increase in the variable interest rate would increase our interest payable on debt outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility and therefore decrease our cash flows available for distribution to shareholders. Based on our variable rate debt outstanding as of March 31, 2007, a 1% change in interest rates would result in a change in interest expense of approximately $1.1 million per year.
We are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate variations resulting from the remeasurement and translation of the financial statements of our subsidiaries located in Toronto, Canada. As of March 31, 2007 and for the three months then ended, we recorded a gain on foreign currency transactions of approximately $134,000 in our condensed consolidated statement of operations and approximately $206,000 of other comprehensive income included in our condensed consolidated statement of shareholders’ equity related to our Toronto subsidiaries. Management does not believe that variations in the foreign currency exchange rates pose a significant risk to our consolidated results of operations or financial position.
| |
Item 4T. | Controls and Procedures. |
In accordance withRules 13a-15 and15d-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), we, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inRule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2007, to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
Other than those described below, no change occurred in our internal controls over financial reporting (as defined inRule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the three months ended March 31, 2007 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
During the three months ended March 31, 2007, we continued the implementation of an upgrade to our financial and accounting systems with the implementation of a new enterprise-wide accounting and lease management system for Hines. We anticipate this implementation will be completed by December 31, 2007. This new software affects many aspects of our accounting and financial systems and procedures and results in a significant change to our internal controls. We continue to review the controls affected by the implementation. Appropriate modifications have been or will be made to any affected internal controls during the implementation. Further, we will test all significant modified controls resulting from the implementation to ensure they are functioning effectively.
38
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
| |
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds. |
During the three months ended March 31, 2007, we did not sell any equity securities that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933.
The following table lists shares we redeemed under our share redemption plan during the period covered by this report.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Maximum Number (or
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | Approximate Dollar
| |
| | | | | | | | Total Number of
| | | Value) of Shares
| |
| | Total
| | | | | | Shares Purchased as
| | | that May Yet be
| |
| | Number of
| | | Average Price
| | | Part of Publicly
| | | Purchased Under the
| |
| | Shares
| | | Paid per Share
| | | Announced Plans or
| | | Plans or
| |
Period | | Purchased | | | (or Unit) | | | Programs | | | Programs(1) | |
|
January 1, 2007 to January 31, 2007 | | | 108,831 | | | | 9.36 | | | | 108,831 | | | | 1,951,514 | |
February 1, 2007 to February 28, 2007 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,951,514 | |
March 1, 2007 to March 31, 2007 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,890,147 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 108,831 | | | | 9.36 | | | | 108,831 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | We may redeem shares under the program so long as the total number of shares redeemed during the calendar year does not exceed, as of the date of the redemption, 10% of our shares outstanding on the same date during the prior year. |
The exhibits required by this item are set forth on the Exhibit Index attached hereto.
39
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
| | |
| By: | /s/ Charles M. Baughn |
Charles M. Baughn
Chief Executive Officer
May 11, 2007
| | |
| By: | /s/ Sherri W. Schugart |
Sherri W. Schugart
Chief Financial Officer
May 11, 2007
40
EXHIBIT INDEX
| | | | |
Exhibit No. | | | | Description |
|
3.1 | | — | | Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Amendment No. 5 to the registrant’s Registration Statement onForm S-11,File No. 333-108780, on May 25, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference). |
3.2 | | — | | Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the registrant’s Current Report onForm 8-K on August 3, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference). |
10.1 | | — | | First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of January 19, 2007, among Hines REIT 3100 McKinnon Street LP, Hines REIT 1900/2000 Alameda de las Pulgas LLC, Hines REIT 321 North Clark Street LLC and the Borrowing, Base Subsidiaries party thereto from time to time, as Borrowers, Hines REIT Properties, LP., as sponsor, HSH Nordbank AG, New York Branch, as lender and as Agent and Arranger, and the lenders party thereto from time to time (filed as Exhibit 10.77 to Amendment No. 4 to registrant’s Registration Statement onForm S-11, FileNo. 333-130114 (the “Second Registration Statement”), and incorporated herein by reference). |
10.2 | | — | | Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of March 27, 2007, by and between Bay West Design Center, LLC, Bay West Seattle, LLC, and Hines REIT Properties, L.P. (filed as Exhibit 10.78 to the Second Registration Statement and incorporated herein by reference). |
31.1* | | — | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31.2* | | — | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.1* | | — | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Pursuant to SEC Release34-47551 this Exhibit is furnished to the SEC and shall not be deemed to be “filed.” |
41