Hines Real Estate Investment Trust 424B3 Prospectus supplement

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)

File No.:333-130114

HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
SUPPLEMENT NO. 16 DATED APRIL 3, 2008
TO THE PROSPECTUS DATED APRIL 30, 2007

This prospectus supplement (“Supplement”) is part of and should be read in conjunction with the prospectus of Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., dated April 30, 2007 (the “Prospectus”), Supplement No. 7 dated July 16, 2007, Supplement No. 11 dated October 16, 2007 and Supplement No. 15 dated January 16, 2008. The Prospectus superseded and replaced the original prospectus for this offering, dated June 19, 2006, and all prior supplements to such prospectus. Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms used in this supplement shall have the same meanings as in the Prospectus.

The purposes of this Supplement are as follows:

A. To provide an update on the status of our current public offering;

B. To provide information regarding distributions recently authorized by our board of directors;

C. To describe the acquisition by Hines REIT of a property located in Kansas City, Missouri;

D. To describe the acquisition by Hines REIT of a property located in El Segundo, California;

E. To describe the potential acquisition by Hines REIT of a property located in Houston, Texas;

F. To describe the acquisition by the Core Fund of a property located in Chicago, Illinois;

G. To describe the election of new officers and directors of Hines REIT;

H. To include ourForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007; and

I. To update the “Experts” section of our Prospectus.

A.   Status of our Current Public Offering

As of March 31, 2008, we have received gross proceeds of approximately $1,239.8 million from the sale of approximately 119.3 million of our common shares in our current public offering, including approximately $60.4 million relating to approximately 6.1 million shares issued under our dividend reinvestment plan. As of March 31, 2008, approximately $820.6 million in shares remained available for sale pursuant to the offering, exclusive of approximately $139.6 million in shares available under our dividend reinvestment plan.

B.   Distributions Authorized by our Board of Directors

With the authorization of our board of directors, we have declared distributions for the months of February, March and April 2008. The distributions will be calculated based on shareholders of record each day during each month in an amount equal to $0.00170959 per share, per day. The distributions for the months of February and March will be aggregated and paid in cash in April 2008 and the distributions for the month of April will be paid in cash in July 2008.

C.   Acquisition of 2555 Grand by Hines REIT

On February 29, 2008, we acquired a 24-story office building located at 2555 Grand in the Crown Center submarket of Kansas City, Missouri. The seller, Crown Center Redevelopment Corporation, is not affiliated with us or our affiliates.

2555 Grand was constructed in 2003 and consists of 595,607 square feet of rentable area that is 100% leased to Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P., an international law firm, under a lease that expires in February 2024 and contains options to renew for two additional five-year periods.

Our management currently has no plans for material renovations or other capital improvements at 2555 Grand and it believes the property is suitable for its intended purpose and adequately covered by insurance. The cost of

2555 Grand (excluding the cost attributable to land) will be depreciated for tax purposes over a40-year period on a straight-line basis.

The contract purchase price for 2555 Grand was $155.8 million, exclusive of transaction costs, financing fees and working capital reserves. We funded the acquisition using proceeds from our current public offering. In connection with the acquisition of this property, we paid our Advisor approximately $779,000 in cash acquisition fees. Likewise, the interest in the Operating Partnership represented by the Participation Interest increased as a result of this acquisition.

D.   Acquisition of the Raytheon/DirecTV Buildings by Hines REIT

On March 13, 2008, we acquired the Raytheon/DirecTV Buildings, a complex consisting of two office buildings located in the South Bay submarket of El Segundo, California. The seller, Newkirk Segair L.P., is not affiliated with us or our affiliates.

The Raytheon/DirecTV Buildings were constructed in 1976 and consist of 550,579 square feet of rentable area that are 100% leased to Raytheon Company, a defense and aerospace systems supplier under a lease that expires in December 2008. DirecTV, a satellite television provider, subleases 205,202 square feet, or approximately 37% of the buildings’ rentable area from Raytheon, under a lease that expires in December 2008. Raytheon has executed a lease for 345,377 square feet, or approximately 63% of the buildings’ rentable area, which commences January 1, 2009, and expires on December 31, 2018. DirecTV has executed a lease for 205,202 square feet, or approximately 37% of the buildings’ rentable area, which commences January 1, 2009, and expires on December 31, 2013.

Our management currently has no plans for material renovations or other capital improvements at the Raytheon/DirecTV Buildings and it believes the property is suitable for its intended purpose and adequately covered by insurance. The cost of the Raytheon/DirecTV Buildings (excluding the cost attributable to land) will be depreciated for tax purposes over a40-year period on a straight-line basis.

The contract purchase price for the Raytheon/DirecTV Buildings was $120.0 million, exclusive of transaction costs, financing fees and working capital reserves. We funded the acquisition using proceeds from our current public offering, borrowings under our revolving credit facility and the assumption of a $54.2 million existing mortgage loan. In connection with the acquisition of this property, we expect to pay our Advisor approximately $600,000 in cash acquisition fees. Likewise, the interest in the Operating Partnership represented by the Participation Interest will increase as a result of this acquisition.

E.   Potential Acquisition of Williams Tower by Hines REIT

On March 18, 2008, we entered into a contract to acquire: (i) Williams Tower, a 65-story office building with an adjacent parking garage located in the Galleria/West Loop submarket of Houston, Texas; (ii) a 47.8% undivided interest in a2.8-acre park and waterwall adjacent to Williams Tower; and (iii) a2.3-acre land parcel located across the street from Williams Tower on Post Oak Boulevard. The balance of the undivided interest in the park and waterwall is owned by an affiliate of Hines. The seller, Transco Tower Limited, is not affiliated with us or our affiliates.

Williams Tower was constructed in 1982 and consists of approximately 1.5 million square feet of rentable area that is approximately 91% leased. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp, a natural gas pipe line operator, leases 250,001 square feet or approximately 16% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in March 2014 and contains options to renew for three additional five-year periods. Black Box Network Services (formerly known as NextiraOne, LLC), a telecommunications infrastructure provider, leases 186,777 square feet or approximately 12% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in March 2009. The remaining lease space is leased to 48 tenants, none of which leases more than 10% of the building’s rentable area.

Williams Tower is currently managed by Hines. In addition, we are headquartered in Williams Tower and Hines and its affiliates lease space in Williams Tower. In the aggregate, Hines and its affiliates lease 9% of the building’s rentable area.

The contract purchase price for Williams Tower and the other property in connection therewith, as described above, is expected to be approximately $271.5 million, exclusive of transaction costs, financing fees and working capital reserves. In connection with the acquisition of this property, we expect to pay our Advisor $1.4 million in

cash acquisition fees. Likewise, the interest in the Operating Partnership represented by the Participation Interest will increase as a result of the acquisition.

We expect to close this acquisition on May 1, 2008, subject to a number of customary closing conditions, including the delivery by the seller of estoppel certificates from certain tenants and the delivery by us and Transco Tower Limited of certain closing documents. There can be no assurances that this acquisition will be consummated. If the acquisition is not consummated because we default under the contract, we will forfeit our $30.0 million earnest money deposit.

F.   Acquisition of One North Wacker by the Core Fund

On March 31, 2008, an indirect subsidiary of the Core Fund acquired One North Wacker, a 51-story office building located in the West Loop submarket of the central business district of Chicago, Illinois. One North Wacker was constructed in 2001 and contains 1.4 million square feet of rentable area that is approximately 98% leased. The contract purchase price for One North Wacker was $540.0 million, exclusive of transaction costs, financing fees and working capital reserves. The Operating Partnership owns an approximate 28.7% interest in the Core Fund.

UBS, a financial institution, leases 452,049 square feet or approximately 33% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in September 2012. PriceWaterhouseCoopers, an accounting firm, leases 256,477 square feet or approximately 19% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in October 2013. Citadel, a financial institution, leases 161,488 square feet or approximately 12% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in August 2012. The remaining lease space is leased to 32 tenants, none of which leases more than 10% of the net rentable area of One North Wacker.

G.   Changes to our Board of Directors and Officers

Directors

On March 12, 2008, our board determined to expand its size by two members, from five to seven, and to elect Paul B. Murphy Jr. and Charles M. Baughn to fill the resulting vacancies. Each of Messrs. Murphy’s and Baughn’s term as a director began on April 1, 2008, and each will serve as a director until our next annual meeting of shareholders or (if longer) until his successor is duly elected and qualified.

The elections of Messrs. Murphy and Baughn as directors were not made pursuant to any arrangement or understanding between either of them and any other person. Our board has determined that Mr. Murphy will qualify as “independent” under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange and our charter.

Mr. Baughn joined Hines in 1984 and most recently served as our Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Baughn resigned from the office of Chief Executive Officer, effective April 1, 2008. Additionally, Mr. Baughn resigned from the office of Chief Executive Officer of the Advisor, effective April 1, 2008 and was elected as a Manager of the general partner of the Advisor effective as of April 1, 2008. He is also an Executive Vice President and the Chief Executive Officer — Capital Markets Group of the general partner of Hines, responsible for overseeing Hines’ capital markets group, which raises, places and manages equity and debt financing for Hines projects. Mr. Baughn is also a member of Hines’ Executive Committee, the Chief Executive Officer and a director of our Dealer Manager, and a member of the management board of the Core Fund. During his tenure at Hines, he has contributed to the development or redevelopment of over nine million square feet of office and special use facilities in the southwestern United States. He graduated from the New York State College of Ceramics at Alfred University with a B.A. and received his M.B.A. from the University of Colorado. Mr. Baughn holds Series 7, 24 and 63 securities licenses.

Mr. Murphy is Executive Vice President of Zions Bancorporation and Chief Executive Officer of Amegy Bank of Texas (formerly known as Southwest Bank of Texas). Mr. Murphy began his banking career at Allied Bank of Texas in 1981 and joined Amegy Bank in 1990 as an Executive Vice President. With little more than $50 million in assets and one location 17 years ago, Amegy Bank now has more than $11 billion in assets, nearly 1,900 employees, and more than 85 banking centers throughout the greater Houston, Dallas and San Antonio metropolitan areas. Mr. Murphy became President in 1996 and CEO in 2000. He serves on the boards of the Houston Endowment, St. Luke’s Episcopal Health Care System, Greater Houston Community Foundation, Greater Houston Partnership and Children’s Museum of Houston. He received his bachelor degree in finance from Mississippi State University and his M.B.A. from the University of Texas at Austin.

As disclosed in the Prospectus, we entered into a credit agreement in 2006 with Key Bank, as administrative agent for itself and various other lenders named in the credit agreement. The credit agreement provides for a revolving credit facility with a maximum aggregate borrowing capacity of up to $250.0 million. Amegy Bank N.A., as one of the lenders named in the credit agreement, provides $10.0 million of capacity under this revolving credit facility and receives fees and interest related thereto. The revolving credit facility was obtained in the ordinary course of business, on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable loans with persons not related to the lenders and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features.

Beginning April 1, 2008, Mr. Murphy will be entitled to the same compensation as the other independent members of the board. On April 1, 2008, we granted Mr. Murphy 353.5 shares of stock in accordance with our Employee and Director Incentive Share Plan. These shares will vest ratably over the term for which he was elected. Mr. Baughn and our other directors employed by affiliates of the Advisor do not receive compensation from us for their service on the board.

Officers

Also on March 12, 2008, the board elected the following persons to the following positions, effective as of April 1, 2008:

Name	Age		Position
Charles N. Hazen		46	President and Chief Executive Officer
Edmund A. Donaldson		38	Chief Investment Officer
Frank R. Apollo		40	Vice President — Finance; Treasurer and Secretary
Kevin L. McMeans		43	Asset Management Officer
Ryan T. Sims		36	Chief Accounting Officer

Prior to April 1, 2008, Mr. Hazen served as our President and Chief Operating Officer. He tendered his resignation as Chief Operating Officer, effective as of April 1, 2008, to the board in connection with the appointments that were made by the board on March 12, 2008. Prior to April 1, 2008, Mr. Apollo served as our Chief Accounting Officer. He tendered his resignation from that office, effective as of April 1, 2008. Each officer will hold office until his successor is elected and qualified or until his death, resignation or removal in the manner set forth in our bylaws. We do not have any employees and do not compensate our executive officers who are employees of the Advisor or its affiliates. However, we pay fees to the Advisor and its affiliates for the services such entities provide to us as described in the Prospectus. Set forth below is certain biographical information concerning the officers listed above.

Charles N. Hazen.  In addition to serving as our President, Mr. Hazen began service as our Chief Executive Officer on April 1, 2008. Mr. Hazen also currently serves as the President and Chief Executive Officer of the general partner of the Advisor. Effective April 1, 2008, he resigned as Chief Operating Officer of the general partner of the Advisor and began service as the President and Chief Executive Officer of the general partner of the Advisor. He is also a Senior Vice President of the general partner of Hines, the President and a member of the management board of the Core Fund and a director of the Dealer Manager. Mr. Hazen joined Hines in 1989. During his tenure at Hines, Mr. Hazen has contributed to the development, management and financing of retail and office properties in the U.S. valued at approximately $9.0 billion and managed Hines Corporate Properties, a $700 million fund that developed and acquired single-tenant office buildings in the U.S. Mr. Hazen graduated from the University of Kentucky with a B.S. in Finance and received his J.D. from the University of Kentucky.

Edmund A. Donaldson.  Mr. Donaldson began service as Chief Investment Officer for us and the general partner of the Advisor on April 1, 2008. He is also a Senior Vice President of the general partner of Hines and the Senior Investment Officer and member of the management board of the Core Fund. Mr. Donaldson joined Hines in 1994. He has been responsible for the acquisition of over $7 billion in assets for various Hines affiliates. He also was instrumental in the investment and management of the combined capitalization of $825 million of the Hines 1997 U.S. Office Development Fund, L.P. and the Hines 1999 U.S. Office Development Fund, L.P. He was also responsible for the investment and management of Hines Suburban Office Venture, L.L.C. formed in January 2002 with a total capital commitment of $222 million. He graduated from the University of California, San Diego with a B.A. in Quantitative Economics and Decision Sciences and received his M.B.A. from Rice University.

Frank R. Apollo.  In addition to serving as our Treasurer and Secretary, Mr. Apollo began service as our Vice President — Finance on April 1, 2008. Prior to April 1, 2008, Mr. Apollo served as the Chief Accounting Officer for

us, the general partner of the Advisor and the Core Fund and also served as the Treasurer and Secretary for us and the general partner of the Advisor. Effective April 1, 2008, he resigned as Chief Accounting Officer of these entities and began service as the Vice President — Finance for us, the general partner of the Advisor and the Core Fund as well as the Treasurer and Secretary for us and the general partner of the Advisor. He is also a Vice President of the general partner of Hines and the Vice President, Treasurer and Secretary of the Dealer Manager. Mr. Apollo joined Hines in 1993. He has served as the Vice President and Corporate Controller responsible for the accounting and control functions for Hines’ international operations. He was also previously the Vice President and Regional Controller for Hines’ European Region and, prior to that, was the director of Hines’ Internal Audit Department. Before joining Hines, Mr. Apollo was an audit manager with Arthur Andersen. He graduated from the University of Texas with a B.B.A. in Accounting, is a certified public accountant and holds Series 28 and 63 securities licenses.

Kevin L. McMeans.  Mr. McMeans began service as the Asset Management Officer for us and the general partner of the Advisor on April 1, 2008. He is also a Vice President of the general partner of Hines and the Asset Management Officer of the Core Fund. Mr. McMeans joined Hines in 1992. He previously served as the Chief Financial Officer of Hines Corporate Properties, an investment venture established by Hines with a major U.S. pension fund. In this role, Mr. McMeans was responsible for negotiating and closing in excess of $800 million of debt financings, underwriting and evaluating new investments, negotiating and closing sale transactions and overseeing the administrative and financial reporting requirements of the venture and its investors. Before joining Hines, Mr. McMeans spent four and a half years at Deloitte and Touche LLP in the Audit Department. He graduated from Texas A&M University with a B.S. in Computer Science and is a certified public accountant.

Ryan T. Sims.  Mr. Sims began service as the Chief Accounting Officer for us, the general partner of the Advisor and the Core Fund on April 1, 2008. Mr. Sims joined Hines in 2003. He is also a Vice President of the general partner of Hines and has served as a Senior Controller for us, the general partner of the Advisor and the Core Fund. In this role, Mr. Sims has responsibility for managing the accounting, financial reporting and SEC reporting for us as well as the accounting and financial reporting for the Core Fund. Prior to joining Hines, Mr. Sims was a manager in the audit practice of Arthur Andersen, LLP and Deloitte & Touche LLP, serving clients primarily in the real estate industry. He holds a Bachelor of Business Administration degree in Accounting from Baylor University and is a certified public accountant.

H.   Annual Report onForm 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2007

On March 27, 2008, we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. The report (without exhibits) is attached as Exhibit A to this Supplement.

I.   Experts

The following discussion supplements “Experts” and is hereby inserted immediately prior to the caption “Privacy Policy Notice” on page 179 of the Prospectus:

“The consolidated financial statements of Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007, the related financial statement schedule, and the consolidated financial statements of Hines-Sumisei U.S. Core Office Fund, L.P. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007, included in this Prospectus have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their reports appearing herein, and have been so included in reliance upon the reports of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.”

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

(Mark One)
þ	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007
	OR
o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number:000-50805

HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Maryland (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)	20-0138854 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
2800 Post Oak Boulevard Suite 5000 Houston, Texas	77056-6118 (Zip code)
(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:

(888) 220-6121

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes o     No þ

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.  Yes o     No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ     No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 ofRegulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part II of thisForm 10-K or any amendment to thisForm 10-K.  þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer þ
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting Company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined inRule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o     No þ

Aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant: No established market exists for the registrant’s common stock.

The registrant had 170,665,671 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 14, 2008.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the Registrant’s proxy statement in connection with its 2008 annual meeting of shareholders are incorporated by reference in Part III.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I
	Item 1.	Business	2
	Item 1A.	Risk Factors	6
	Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	30
	Item 2.	Properties	31
	Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	42
	Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	42
PART II
	Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Redemption of Equity Securities	43
	Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	47
	Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation	48
	Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	69
	Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	70
	Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	104
	Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	104
	Item 9B.	Other Information	105
PART III
	Item 10.	Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant	106
	Item 11.	Executive Compensation	106
	Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters	106
	Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions	106
	Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	106
PART IV
	Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	106

1

PART I

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Statements in thisForm 10-K that are not historical facts (including any statements concerning investment objectives, economic updates, other plans and objectives of management for future operations or economic performance, or assumptions or forecasts related thereto) are forward-looking statements. These statements are only predictions. We caution that forward-looking statements are not guarantees. Actual events or our investments and results of operations could differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by the use of terms such as “may,” “should,” “expect,” “could,” “intend,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “continue,” “predict,” “potential” or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology.

The forward-looking statements in thisForm 10-K are based on our current expectations, plans, estimates, assumptions and beliefs that involve numerous risks and uncertainties. Assumptions relating to the foregoing involve judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive and market conditions and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond our control. Any of the assumptions underlying forward-looking statements could be inaccurate. To the extent that our assumptions differ from actual results, our ability to meet such forward-looking statements, including our ability to generate positive cash flow from operations, provide distributions to our shareholders and maintain the value of the real estate properties in which we hold an interest, may be significantly hindered.

Our shareholders are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement in thisForm 10-K. All forward-looking statements are made as of the date of thisForm 10-K, and the risk that actual results will differ materially from the expectations expressed in thisForm 10-K may increase with the passage of time. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements in thisForm 10-K, the inclusion of such forward-looking statements should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that the objectives and plans set forth in thisForm 10-K will be achieved. Please see “Item 1A. Risk Factors” for a discussion of some of the risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those presented in certain forward-looking statements.

Item 1.   Business

General Description of Business and Operations

Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (“Hines REIT”), was formed on August 5, 2003 primarily for the purpose of engaging in the business of investing in and owning interests in real estate. Hines REIT has invested and intends to continue to invest primarily in institutional-quality office properties located throughout the United States. Hines REIT also has real estate investments located in Toronto, Ontario and Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. In addition, Hines REIT has invested or may invest in other real estate investments including, but not limited to, properties located outside of the United States, non-office properties, loans and ground leases. Hines REIT is structured as an umbrella partnership real estate investment trust, or UPREIT, and substantially all of Hines REIT’s current and future business is and will be conducted through Hines REIT Properties, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”). We refer to Hines REIT, the Operating Partnership and its wholly-owned subsidiaries as the “Company,” and the use of “we,” “our,” “us” or similar pronouns in this annual report refers to Hines REIT or the Company as required by the context in which such pronoun is used.

As of December 31, 2007, we owned interests in 39 office properties located throughout the United States, one mixed-use office and retail complex in Toronto, Ontario and one industrial property in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. These properties contain, in the aggregate, 22.8 million square feet of leasable space. We refer to assets we own 100% as “directly-owned properties”. Our industrial property in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil is owned indirectly through a joint venture with a Hines affiliate and all other properties are owned indirectly through our investment in Hines U.S. Core Office Fund, L.P. (the “Core Fund”). The Core Fund is a partnership organized in August 2003 by our sponsor, Hines Interest Limited Partnership (“Hines”), to invest

2

in existing “core” office properties in the United States that Hines believes are desirable long-term “core” holdings. The following tables provide summary information regarding the properties in which we owned interests as of December 31, 2007.

Direct Investments

		Leasable			Percent			Our Effective
Property	City	Square Feet			Leased			Ownership(1)
321 North Clark	Chicago, Illinois		885,664			99	%		100	%
Citymark	Dallas, Texas		220,079			100	%		100	%
JPMorgan Chase Tower	Dallas, Texas		1,242,590			91	%		100	%
Watergate Tower IV	Emeryville, California		344,433			100	%		100	%
One Wilshire	Los Angeles, California		661,553			99	%		100	%
3 Huntington Quadrangle	Melville, New York		407,731			87	%		100	%
Airport Corporate Center	Miami, Florida		1,021,397			90	%		100	%
Minneapolis Office/Flex Portfolio	Minneapolis, Minnesota		766,240			85	%		100	%
3400 Data Drive	Rancho Cordova, California		149,703			100	%		100	%
Daytona Buildings	Redmond, Washington		251,313			93	%		100	%
Laguna Buildings	Redmond, Washington		464,701			100	%		100	%
1515 S Street	Sacramento, California		348,881			100	%		100	%
1900 and 2000 Alameda	San Mateo, California		253,377			96	%		100	%
Seattle Design Center	Seattle, Washington		390,684			84	%		100	%
5th and Bell	Seattle, Washington		197,135			98	%		100	%
Atrium on Bay	Toronto, Ontario		1,070,287			95	%		100	%
Total for Directly-Owned Properties			8,675,768			94	%
Indirect Investments
Core Fund Investment
One Atlantic Center	Atlanta, Georgia		1,100,312			84	%		27.47	%
The Carillon Building	Charlotte, North Carolina		470,726			100	%		27.47	%
Charlotte Plaza	Charlotte, North Carolina		625,026			97	%		27.47	%
Three First National Plaza	Chicago, Illinois		1,419,978			94	%		21.97	%
333 West Wacker	Chicago, Illinois		845,194			87	%		21.92	%
One Shell Plaza	Houston, Texas		1,228,160			98	%		13.73	%
Two Shell Plaza	Houston, Texas		566,982			95	%		13.73	%
425 Lexington Avenue	New York, New York		700,034			100	%		12.98	%
499 Park Avenue	New York, New York		288,722			100	%		12.98	%
600 Lexington Avenue	New York, New York		283,311			95	%		12.98	%
Renaissance Square	Phoenix, Arizona		965,508			95	%		27.47	%
Riverfront Plaza	Richmond, Virginia		949,791			100	%		27.47	%
Johnson Ranch Corporate Center	Roseville, California		179,990			76	%		21.92	%
Roseville Corporate Center	Roseville, California		111,418			94	%		21.92	%
Summit at Douglas Ridge	Roseville, California		185,128			85	%		21.92	%
Olympus Corporate Center	Roseville, California		191,494			59	%		21.92	%
Douglas Corporate Center	Roseville, California		214,606			85	%		21.92	%
Wells Fargo Center	Sacramento, California		502,365			93	%		21.92	%
525 B Street	San Diego, California		447,159			90	%		27.47	%
The KPMG Building	San Francisco, California		379,328			100	%		27.47	%
101 Second Street	San Francisco, California		388,370			100	%		27.47	%
720 Olive Way	Seattle, Washington		300,710			93	%		21.92	%
1200 19th Street	Washington, D.C.		328,154	(2)		28	%		12.98	%
Warner Center	Woodland Hills, California		808,274			97	%		21.92	%
Total for Core Fund Properties			13,480,740			92	%
Other
Distribution Park Rio	Rio de Janeiro, Brazil		693,115			100	%		50	%
Total for All Properties			22,849,623			93	%

3

(1)

This percentage shows the effective ownership of the Operating Partnership in the properties listed. On December 31, 2007, Hines REIT owned a 97.6% interest in the Operating Partnership as its sole general partner. Affiliates of Hines owned the remaining 2.4% interest in the Operating Partnership. Our interest in Distribution Park Rio is owned through our investment in a joint venture with a Hines affiliate. We own interests in all of the properties other than those identified above as being owned 100% by us and Distribution Park Rio through our interest in the Core Fund, in which we owned an approximate 32.0% non-managing general partner interest as of December 31, 2007. The Core Fund does not own 100% of these buildings; its ownership interest in its buildings ranges from 40.6% to 85.9%.

(2)

This square footage amount includes three floors which are being added to the building and are currently under construction. The construction is expected to be completed in 2009.

We have no employees. Our business is managed by Hines Advisors Limited Partnership (the “Advisor”), an affiliate of Hines, under the terms and conditions of an advisory agreement between us and our Advisor. As compensation for these services, we pay our Advisor asset management and acquisition fees, and we reimburse certain of the Advisor’s expenses in accordance with the advisory agreement. Hines or affiliates of Hines manage the leasing and operations for all of the properties in which we invest, and we pay Hines property management and leasing fees in connection with these services. Hines is owned and controlled by Gerald D. Hines and his son Jeffrey C. Hines, the Chairman of our board of directors. Hines and its 3,550 employees have over 50 years of experience in the areas of investment selection, underwriting, due diligence, portfolio management, asset management, property management, leasing, disposition, finance, accounting and investor relations.

Our office is located at 2800 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 5000, Houston, Texas77056-6118. Our telephone number is 1-888-220-6121. Our web site is www.HinesREIT.com. However, the information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this report.

Primary Investment Objectives

Our primary investment objectives are:

•  to preserve invested capital;

•  to invest in a diversified portfolio of office properties;

•  to pay regular cash dividends;

•  to achieve appreciation of our assets over the long term; and

•  to remain qualified as a real estate investment trust, or “REIT,” for federal income tax purposes.

Acquisition and Investment Policies

We invest primarily in institutional-quality office properties located throughout the United States. We believe that there is an ongoing opportunity to create stable cash returns and attractive total returns by employing a strategy of investing primarily in a diversified portfolio of office properties over the long term. We believe that this strategy can help create stable cash flow and capital appreciation potential if the office portfolio is well-selected and well-diversified in number and location of properties, and the office properties are consistently well-managed. These types of properties are generally located in central business districts or suburban markets of major metropolitan cities. Our principal targeted assets are office properties that have quality construction, desirable locations and quality tenants. We intend to continue to invest in a geographically diverse portfolio in order to reduce the risk of reliance on a particular market, a particular propertyand/or a particular tenant. In addition, we have invested or may invest in other real estate investments including, but not limited to, properties outside of the United States, non-office properties, loans and ground leases. For more information about the properties we acquired during 2007, see “Item 2. Properties — Our Directly-Owned Properties — 2007 Acquisitions.”

4

We also own Atrium on Bay, a mixed-use office and retail complex in Toronto, Ontario and have an indirect interest in an industrial property in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. We believe there are also other significant opportunities for real estate investments that currently exist in other markets outside of the United States. Some of this real estate is located in developed markets such as the United Kingdom, Germany and France, while other real estate investment opportunities are located in emerging or maturing markets such as Brazil, Mexico, Russia and China. We believe that investing in international properties that meet our investment policies and objectives could provide additional diversification and enhanced investment returns to our real estate portfolio.

We may continue to invest in real estate directly by owning 100% of such assets or indirectly by owning less than 100% of such assets through investments with or in other investors or joint venture partners, including other Hines-affiliated entities, such as the Core Fund. We anticipate that we will fund our future acquisitions primarily with proceeds raised from our current public offering (the “Current Offering”) and potential follow-on offerings, as well as with proceeds from debt financings. All of our investment decisions are subject to the approval of a majority of our board of directors, and specifically a majority of our independent directors if an investment involves a transaction with Hines or any of its affiliates.

Financing Strategy and Policies

We expect that once we have fully invested the proceeds of our Current Offering and other potential follow-on offerings, our debt financing, or the debt financing of entities in which we invest, will be in the range of approximately 40%-60% of the aggregate value of our real estate investments. Financing for future acquisitions and investments may be obtained at the time an asset is acquired or an investment is made or at such later time as determined to be appropriate. In addition, debt financing may be used from time to time for property improvements, lease inducements, tenant improvements and other working capital needs. Additionally, the amount of debt placed on an individual property, or the amount of debt incurred by an individual entity in which we invest, may be less than 40% or more than 60% of the value of such property or the value of the assets owned by such entity, depending on market conditions and other factors. Notwithstanding the above, depending on market conditions and other factors, we may choose not to place debt on our portfolio or our assets and may choose not to borrow to finance our operations or to acquire properties.

Additionally, we have and may continue to enter into interest rate swap contracts as economic hedges against the variability of future interest rates on variable interest rate debt.

We had debt financing in an amount equal to approximately 54% of the estimated value of our direct and indirect real estate investments as of December 31, 2007, consisting primarily of outstanding loans under secured mortgage financings. The Core Fund, in which we have invested, had debt financing in an amount equal to approximately 50% of the estimated value of its real estate investments as of December 31, 2007, consisting primarily of outstanding loans under its revolving credit facility and secured mortgage financings. The estimated value of each property was based on the most recent appraisals available or the purchase price, in the case of recent acquisitions.

Distribution Objectives

In order to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we must distribute at least 90% of our taxable income (excluding capital gains) to our shareholders. We intend, although we are not legally obligated, to continue to make regular quarterly distributions to holders of our common shares at least at the level required to maintain our REIT status unless our results of operations, our general financial condition, general economic conditions or other factors inhibit us from doing so. Distributions are authorized at the discretion of our board of directors, which is directed, in substantial part, by its obligation to cause us to comply with the REIT requirements of the Internal Revenue Code.

We declare distributions to our shareholders as of daily record dates and aggregate and pay such distributions quarterly. From January 1, 2006 through June 30, 2006, with the authorization of our board of directors, we declared distributions equal to $0.00164384 per share, per day. From July 1, 2006 through December 31, 2007, we declared distributions equal to $0.00170959 per share, per day. Additionally, we have

5

declared distributions equal to $0.00170959 per share, per day for the period from January 1, 2008 through April 30, 2008.

Tax Status

We elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), beginning with our taxable year ended December 31, 2004. In addition, the Core Fund, in which we own an interest, has invested in properties through other entities that have elected to be taxed as REITs. Our management believes that we and the applicable entities in the Core Fund are organized and operate, and intend to continue operating, in such a manner as to qualify for treatment as REITs. Accordingly, no provision has been made for U.S. federal income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Competition

Numerous real estate companies, real estate investment trusts and U.S. institutional and foreign investors compete with us in acquiring office and other properties and obtaining creditworthy tenants to occupy such properties. Many of these entities have significant financial and other resources, including operating experience, allowing them to compete effectively with us. Principal factors of competition in our primary business of acquiring and owning office properties are the quality of properties, leasing terms (including rent and other charges and allowances for inducements and tenant improvements), the quality and breadth of tenant services provided, and reputation as an owner and operator of quality office properties in the relevant market. Additionally, our ability to compete depends upon, among other factors, trends of the global, national and local economies, investment alternatives, financial condition and operating results of current and prospective tenants, availability and cost of capital, taxes, governmental regulations, legislation and demographic trends.

We believe Hines’ extensive real estate experience and depth and breadth of its organization of 3,550 employees located in 69 cities across the United States and 33 cities in 15 other countries allows it to better identify investment opportunities for us and more effectively operate our real estate assets. However, competition may increase our cost of acquisitions or operations, lower our occupancy or rental rates or increase the level of inducements we offer to tenants.

Customers

We are dependent upon the ability of current tenants to pay their contractual rent amounts as the rents become due. At December 31, 2007, we owned 16 properties directly, a 50% interest in an industrial property in Brazil and held an approximate 32.0% non-managing general partner interest in the Core Fund, which held indirect interests in 24 properties. See “Item 2 — Properties.” No tenant represented more than 10% of our consolidated rental revenue for the year ended December 31, 2007. In addition, we are not aware of any current tenants who will not be able to pay their contractual rental amounts as they become due and whose inability to pay would have a material adverse impact on our results of operations.

Available Information

Shareholders may obtain copies of our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), free of charge from the website maintained by the SEC at www.sec.gov or from our website at www.HinesREIT.com. Our filings will be available on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such materials with the SEC. However, the information from our website is not incorporated by reference into this report.

Item 1A.  Risk Factors

You should carefully read and consider the risks described below together with all other information in this report. If certain of the following risks actually occur, our results of operations and ability to pay distributions would likely suffer materially, or could be eliminated entirely. As a result, the value of our common shares may decline, and you could lose all or part of the money you paid to buy our common shares.

6

Investment Risks

There is currently no public market for our common shares, and we do not intend to list the shares on a stock exchange. Therefore, it will likely be difficult for shareholders to sell their shares and, if they are able to sell their shares, they will likely sell them at a substantial discount. The price of our common shares may be adjusted to a price less than the price shareholders paid for their shares.

There is no public market for our common shares, and we do not expect one to develop. We have no plans to list our shares on a national securities exchange or over-the-counter market, or to include our shares for quotation on any national securities market. Additionally, our charter contains restrictions on the ownership and transfer of our shares, and these restrictions may inhibit the ability of our shareholders to sell their shares. We have a share redemption program, but it is limited in terms of the amount of shares that may be redeemed annually. Our board of directors may also limit, suspend or terminate our share redemption program upon 30 days’ written notice. It may be difficult for shareholders to sell their shares promptly or at all. If shareholders are able to sell their shares, they may only be able to sell them at a substantial discount from the price they paid. This may be the result, in part, of the fact that the amount of funds available for investment are reduced by funds used to pay selling commissions, the dealer-manager fee and acquisition fees in connection with our public offerings. Unless our aggregate investments increase in value to compensate for these up-front fees and expenses, which may not occur, it is unlikely that shareholders will be able to sell their shares, whether pursuant to our share redemption program or otherwise, without incurring a substantial loss. We cannot assure shareholders that their shares will ever appreciate in value to equal the price they paid for their shares. Thus, shareholders should consider our common shares as illiquid and a long-term investment and should be prepared to hold their shares for an indefinite length of time. Further, the price of our shares may be adjusted periodically to reflect changes in the net asset value of our assets as well as changes in fees and expenses and therefore future adjustments may result in an offering price lower than the price shareholders paid for their shares and a redemption price lower than our current redemption price.

Our shareholders’ ability to have their shares redeemed is limited under our share redemption program, and if shareholders are able to have their shares redeemed, it may be at a price that is less than the price paid for and the then-current market value of the shares.

Even though our share redemption program may provide shareholders with a limited opportunity to redeem their shares after they have held them for a period of one year, shareholders should understand that our share redemption program contains significant restrictions and limitations. The Company will redeem shares to the extent our board of directors determines we have sufficient available cash to do so subject to the annual limitation on the number of shares we can redeem set forth in our share redemption program. Further, if at any time all tendered shares are not redeemed, shares will be redeemed on a pro rata basis. The Company may, but is not required to, utilize all sources of cash flow not otherwise dedicated to a particular use to meet shareholders’ redemption needs, including proceeds from our dividend reinvestment plan or securities offerings, operating cash flow not intended for distributions, borrowings and capital transactions such as asset sales or financings. Our board of directors reserves the right to amend, suspend or terminate the share redemption program at any time in its discretion upon 30 days’ written notice. Shares are currently redeemed at a price of $9.52 per share. However, our board of directors may change the redemption price from time to time upon 30 days’ written notice based on the then-current estimated net asset value of our real estate portfolio at the time of the adjustment and such other factors as it deems appropriate, including the then-current offering price of our shares (if any), our then- current dividend reinvestment plan price and general market conditions. The methodology used in determining the redemption price is subject to a number of limitations and to a number of assumptions and estimates which may not be accurate or complete. The redemption price may not be indicative of the price our shareholders would receive if our shares were actively traded, if we were liquidated or if they otherwise sold their shares. Therefore, shareholders should not assume that they will be able to sell all or any portion of their shares back to us pursuant to our share redemption program or at a price that reflects the then-current market value of their shares.

7

Due to the risks involved in the ownership of real estate, there is no guarantee of any return on an investment in our shares, and shareholders may lose some or all of their investment.

By owning our shares, shareholders are subjected to significant risks associated with owning and operating real estate. The performance of your investment in Hines REIT is subject to such risks, including:

•  changes in the general economic climate;

•  changes in local conditions such as an oversupply of space or reduction in demand for real estate;

•  changes in interest rates and the availability of financing;

•  changes in property level operating expenses due to inflation or otherwise; and

•  changes in laws and governmental regulations, including those governing real estate usage, zoning and taxes.

If our assets decrease in value, the value of an investment in our shares will likewise decrease, and shareholders could lose some or all of their investment.

We have invested a significant percentage of our total current investments, and we may make additional investments, in the Core Fund. Because of our current and possible future Core Fund investments, it is likely that Hines affiliates will retain significant control over a significant percentage of our investments even if our independent directors remove our Advisor.

While a majority of our independent directors may remove our Advisor upon 60 days’ written notice, our independent directors cannot unilaterally remove the managing general partner of the Core Fund, which is also an affiliate of Hines. We have substantial investments in the Core Fund and may invest a significant amount of the proceeds received from our Current Offering in the Core Fund. Because of our current Core Fund investments and because our ability to remove the managing general partner of the Core Fund is limited, it is likely that an affiliate of Hines will maintain a substantial degree of control over a significant percentage of our investments despite the removal of our Advisor by our independent directors. Any additional investments by us in the Core Fund will contribute to this risk. In addition, our ability to redeem any investment we hold in the Core Fund is limited. Please see “— Business and Real Estate Risks — Our ability to redeem all or a portion of our investment in the Core Fund is subject to significant restrictions” for more information regarding our ability to redeem any investments in the Core Fund.

Many of the fees we pay were not determined on an arm’s-length basis and therefore may not be on the same terms we could achieve from a third party.

The compensation paid to our Advisor, Dealer Manager (defined below) and other affiliates of Hines for services they provide us was not determined on an arm’s-length basis. All service agreements, contracts or arrangements between or among Hines and its affiliates, including the Advisor and us, were likewise not negotiated at arm’s-length. Such agreements include the advisory agreement we entered into with the Advisor (the “Advisory Agreement”), the agreement (“Dealer Manager Agreement”) we entered into with Hines Real Estate Securities, Inc. (“HRES” or the “Dealer Manager”), and the property management and leasing agreements we entered into with Hines. We cannot assure our shareholders that a third party unaffiliated with Hines would not be able and willing to provide such services to us at a lower price.

We will pay substantial compensation to Hines, the Advisor and their affiliates, which may be increased or decreased during the Current Offering or future offerings by our independent directors.

Subject to limitations in our charter, the fees, compensation, income, expense reimbursements, interests and other payments payable to Hines, the Advisor and their affiliates may increase or decrease during the Current Offering or future offerings if such increase or decrease is approved by our independent directors.

8

If we are only able to sell a small number of shares in our Current Offering, our fixed operating expenses such as general and administrative expenses (as a percentage of gross income) would be higher than if we are able to sell a greater number of shares.

We incur certain fixed operating expenses in connection with our operations, such as costs incurred to secure insurance for our directors and officers, regardless of our size. To the extent we sell fewer than the maximum number of shares we have registered in connection with our Current Offering and any future offerings and therefore are unable to make additional investments which could increase our gross income, these expenses will represent a greater percentage of our gross income and, correspondingly, will have a greater proportionate adverse impact on our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders.

Hines REIT’s interest in the Operating Partnership will be diluted by the Participation Interest in the Operating Partnership held by HALP Associates Limited Partnership and an interest in Hines REIT may be diluted if we issue additional shares.

Hines REIT owned a 97.6% general partner interest in the Operating Partnership as of December 31, 2007. An affiliate of Hines, HALP Associates Limited Partnership, owns a Participation Interest in the Operating Partnership, which was issued as consideration for an obligation by Hines and its affiliates to perform future services in connection with our real estate operations. This interest in the Operating Partnership, as well as the number of shares into which it may be converted, increases on a monthly basis. As of December 31, 2007, the percentage interest in the Operating Partnership attributable to the Participation Interest was 1.7% and such interest was convertible into 2.8 million common shares, subject to the fulfillment of certain conditions. The Participation Interest will increase to the extent leverage is used because the use of leverage will allow the Company to acquire more assets. Each increase in this interest will dilute our shareholders’ indirect investment in the Operating Partnership and, accordingly, reduce the amount of distributions that would otherwise be payable to our shareholders in the future.

Additionally, shareholders do not have preemptive rights to acquire any shares issued by us in the future. Therefore, shareholders may experience dilution of their equity investment if we:

•  sell shares in our public offering or sell additional shares in the future, including those issued pursuant to the dividend reinvestment plan and shares issued to our officers and directors or employees of the Advisor and its affiliates under our Employee and Director Incentive Share Plan;

•  sell securities that are convertible into shares, such as interests in the Operating Partnership;

•  issue shares in a private offering;

•  issue common shares upon the exercise of options granted to our independent directors, or employees of the Company or the Advisor; or

•  issue shares to sellers of properties acquired by us in connection with an exchange of partnership units from the Operating Partnership.

The redemption of interests in the Operating Partnership held by Hines and its affiliates (including the Participation Interest) as required by our Advisory Agreement upon its termination may discourage a takeover attempt if the takeover attempt would include the termination of our Advisory Agreement.

In the event of a merger in which we are not the surviving entity, and pursuant to which our Advisory Agreement is terminated under certain circumstances, Hines and its affiliates may require the Operating Partnership to purchase all or a portion of the Participation Interest and any partnership units in the Operating Partnership (“OP Units”) or other interest in the Operating Partnership that they hold at any time thereafter for cash, or our shares, as determined by the seller. The Participation Interest increases on a monthly basis and, as the percentage interest in the Operating Partnership attributable to this interest increases, these rights may deter transactions that could result in a merger in which we are not the survivor. This deterrence may limit the opportunity for shareholders to receive a premium for their common shares that might otherwise exist if an investor attempted to acquire us through a merger.

9

The Participation Interest would increase at a faster rate with frequent dispositions of properties followed by acquisitions using proceeds from such dispositions.

A component of the Participation Interest is intended to approximate an increased interest in the Operating Partnership based on a percentage of the cost of our investments or acquisitions. Because the interest in the Operating Partnership represented by the Participation Interest increases with each acquisition we make, if we frequently sell assets and reinvest the proceeds of such dispositions, the Participation Interest would increase at a faster rate than it would if we acquired assets and held them for an extended period. Likewise, if we frequently sell assets and reinvest the proceeds of such dispositions, our Advisor will earn additional cash acquisition fees.

Hines’ ability to cause the Operating Partnership to purchase the Participation Interest and any OP Units it and its affiliates hold in connection with the termination of the Advisory Agreement may deter us from terminating the Advisory Agreement.

Under our Advisory Agreement, if we are not advised by an entity affiliated with Hines, Hines or its affiliates may cause the Operating Partnership to purchase some or all of the Participation Interest or OP Units then held by such entities. The purchase price will be based on the net asset value of the Operating Partnership and payable in cash, or our shares, as determined by the seller. If the termination of the Advisory Agreement would result in the Company not being advised by an affiliate of Hines, and if the amount necessary to purchase Hines’ interest in the Operating Partnership is substantial, these rights could discourage or deter us from terminating the Advisory Agreement under circumstances in which we would otherwise do so.

We may issue preferred shares or separate classes or series of common shares, which issuance could adversely affect the holders of our common shares.

We may issue, without shareholder approval, preferred shares or a class or series of common shares with rights that could adversely affect our holders of the common shares. Upon the affirmative vote of a majority of our directors (including in the case of preferred shares, a majority of our independent directors), our charter authorizes our board of directors (without any further action by our shareholders) to issue preferred shares or common shares in one or more class or series, and to fix the voting rights (subject to certain limitations), liquidation preferences, dividend rates, conversion rights, redemption rights and terms, including sinking fund provisions, and certain other rights and preferences with respect to such class or series of shares. In addition, a majority of our independent directors must approve the issuance of preferred shares. If we ever create and issue preferred shares with a dividend preference over common shares, payment of any dividend preferences of outstanding preferred shares would reduce the amount of funds available for the payment of dividends on the common shares. Further, holders of preferred shares are normally entitled to receive a preference payment in the event we liquidate, dissolve or wind up before any payment is made to the common shareholders, likely reducing the amount common shareholders would otherwise receive upon such an occurrence. We could also designate and issue shares in a class or series of common shares with similar rights. In addition, under certain circumstances, the issuance of preferred shares or a separate class or series of common shares may render more difficult or tend to discourage:

•  a merger, offer or proxy contest;

•  the assumption of control by a holder of a large block of our securities; and/or

•  the removal of incumbent management.

10

We are not registered as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, and therefore we will not be subject to the requirements imposed on an investment company by such Act. Similarly, the Core Fund is not registered as an investment company.

We are not, and the Core Fund is not, registered as an “investment company” under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Investment Company Act”). Investment companies subject to this Act are required to comply with a variety of substantive requirements, such as requirements relating to:

•  limitations on the capital structure of the entity;

•  restrictions on certain investments;

•  prohibitions on transactions with affiliated entities; and

•  public reporting disclosures, record keeping, voting procedures, proxy disclosure and similar corporate governance rules and regulations.

Many of these requirements are intended to provide benefits or protections to security holders of investment companies. Because we do not expect to be subject to these requirements, our shareholders will not be entitled to these benefits or protections.

In order to operate in a manner to avoid being required to register as an investment company, we may be unable to sell assets we would otherwise want to sell or we may need to sell assets we would otherwise wish to retain. In addition, we may also have to forgo opportunities to acquire interests in companies or entities that we would otherwise want to acquire. The operations of the Core Fund may likewise be limited in order for the Core Fund to avoid being required to register as an investment company.

If Hines REIT, the Operating Partnership or the Core Fund is required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act, the additional expenses and operational limitations associated with such registration may reduce our shareholders’ investment return or impair our ability to conduct our business as planned.

We do not expect to operate as an “investment company” under the Investment Company Act. However, the analysis relating to whether a company qualifies as an investment company can involve technical and complex rules and regulations. If we own assets that qualify as “investment securities” as such term is defined under this Act, and the value of such assets exceeds 40% of the value of our total assets, we could be deemed to be an investment company. It is possible that many of our interests in real estate may be held through other entities, and some or all of these interests in other entities could be deemed to be investment securities.

If we held investment securities and the value of these securities exceeded 40% of the value of our total assets, we may be required to register as an investment company. Investment companies are subject to a variety of substantial requirements that could significantly impact our operations. Please see “— We are not registered as an investment company under the Investment Company Act and therefore we will not be subject to the requirements imposed on an investment company by such Act. Similarly, the Core Fund is not registered as an investment company.” The costs and expenses we would incur to register and operate as an investment company, as well as the limitations placed on our operations, could have a material adverse impact on our operations and the investment return on our shares.

We have received an opinion from our counsel, Greenberg Traurig, LLP that is based on certain assumptions and representations and taking into consideration our current assets and the percentage which could be deemed “investment securities,” we are not currently an investment company.

If we were required to register as an investment company, but failed to do so, we would be prohibited from engaging in our business, criminal and civil actions could be brought against us, some of our contracts might be unenforceable unless a court were to direct enforcement, and a court could appoint a receiver to take control of us and liquidate our business.

Our investment in the Core Fund is subject to the risks described in this risk factor, as the Core Fund will need to operate in a manner to avoid qualifying as an investment company as well. If the Core Fund is

11

required to register as an investment company, the extra costs and expenses and limitations on operations resulting from such as described above could adversely impact the Core Fund’s operations, which would indirectly reduce the return on our shares and such registration also could adversely affect our status as an investment company.

The ownership limit in our charter may discourage a takeover attempt.

Our charter provides that no holder of shares, other than Hines, affiliates of Hines or any other person to whom our board of directors grants an exemption, may directly or indirectly own, as to any class or series of shares, more than 9.9% in value or in number, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of such class or series of our outstanding securities. This ownership limit may deter tender offers for our common shares, which offers may be attractive to our shareholders and thus may limit the opportunity for shareholders to receive a premium for their common shares that might otherwise exist if an investor attempted to assemble a block of common shares in excess of these limits or otherwise to effect a change of control in us.

We will not be afforded the protection of the Maryland General Corporation Law relating to business combinations.

Provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law prohibit business combinations unless prior approval of the board of directors is obtained before the person seeking the combination became an interested shareholder, with:

•  any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power of our outstanding shares (an “interested shareholder”);

•  any of our affiliates who, at any time within the two-year period prior to the date in question, was the beneficial owner of 10% or more of the voting power of our outstanding shares (also an “interested shareholder”); or

•  an affiliate of an interested shareholder.

These prohibitions are intended to prevent a change of control by interested shareholders who do not have the support of our board of directors. Because our charter contains limitations on ownership of 9.9% or more of our common shares by a shareholder other than Hines or an affiliate of Hines, we opted out of the business combinations statute in our charter. Therefore, we will not be afforded the protections of this statute and, accordingly, there is no guarantee that the ownership limitations in our charter will provide the same measure of protection as the business combinations statute and prevent an undesired change of control by an interested shareholder.

Business and Real Estate Risks

Any indirect investment we make will be consistent with the investment objectives and policies described in this report and will, therefore, be subject to similar business and real estate risks. The Core Fund, which has investment objectives and policies similar to ours, is subject to many of the same business and real estate risks as we are. For example, the Core Fund:

•  may not have sufficient available funds to make distributions;

•  expects to acquire additional properties in the future which, if unsuccessful, could affect our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders;

•  is subject to risks as a result of joint ownership of real estate with Hines and other Hines programs or third parties;

•  intends to use borrowings to partially fund acquisitions, which may result in foreclosures and unexpected debt-service requirements and indirectly negatively affect our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders;

•  is also dependent upon Hines and its key employees for its success;

12

•  also operates in a competitive business with competitors who have significant financial resources and operational flexibility;

•  may not have funding or capital resources for future tenant improvements;

•  depends on its tenants for its revenue and relies on certain significant tenants;

•  is subject to risks associated with terrorism, uninsured losses and high insurance costs;

•  will be affected by general economic and regulatory factors it cannot control or predict;

•  will make illiquid investments and be subject to general economic and regulatory factors, including environmental laws, which it cannot control or predict; and

•  will be subject to property taxes and operating expenses that may increase.

To the extent the operations and ability of the Core Fund, or any other entity through which we indirectly invest in real estate, to make distributions is adversely affected by any of these risks, our operations and ability to pay distributions to our shareholders will be adversely affected.

We are different in some respects from other programs sponsored by Hines, and therefore the past performance of such programs may not be indicative of our future results.

We are Hines’ only publicly-offered investment program and one of Hines’ first REITs. Hines’ previous programs and investments were conducted through privately-held entities not subject to either the up-front commissions, fees or expenses associated with our public offerings or all of the laws and regulations that govern us, including reporting requirements under the federal securities laws, and tax and other regulations applicable to REITs. A significant portion of Hines’ other programs and investments also involve development projects. Although we are not prohibited from participating in development projects, we currently do not expect to participate in significant development activities. We are also the first program sponsored by Hines with investment objectives permitting the making and purchasing of loans and participations in loans, and Hines does not have significant experience making such investments.

The past performance of other programs sponsored by Hines may not be indicative of our future results and we may not be able to successfully operate our business and implement our investment strategy, which may be different in a number of respects from the operations previously conducted by Hines. Shareholders should not rely on the past performance of other programs or investments sponsored by Hines to predict or as an indication of our future performance.

Geographic and industry concentration of our portfolio may make us particularly susceptible to adverse economic developments in those areas and sectors.

We expect that rental income from real property will, directly or indirectly, constitute substantially all of our income. In the event that we have a concentration of properties in a particular geographic area or the business activities of our tenants are concentrated in a particular industry, our operating results and ability to make distributions are likely to be impacted by economic changes affecting the real estate markets in that area or that industry. An investment in the Company will be subject to greater risk to the extent that we lack a portfolio that is diversified geographically and across industries. For example, as of December 31, 2007, approximately 12% of our portfolio consists of properties located in Chicago, 12% of our portfolio consists of properties located in Los Angeles, 12% of our portfolio consists of properties located in Seattle and 11% of our portfolio consists of properties located in Dallas. Further, as of December 31, 2007, based on our pro-rata share of the square footage leased by our tenants at all of the properties in which we own an interest, 22% of our portfolio is leased to tenants in the finance and insurance industry, 17% of our portfolio is leased to tenants in the legal industry, and 10% of our portfolio is leased to tenants in the information industry. Consequently, our financial condition and ability to make distributions could be materially and adversely affected by any significant adverse developments in those markets or industries. Please see “Item 2. Properties — Market Concentration and — Industry Concentration.”

13

Delays in purchasing properties with proceeds received from our Current Offering may result in a lower rate of return to investors.

We expect to continue to conduct public offerings on a “best efforts” basis. Our ability to locate and commit to purchase specific properties with the proceeds raised from public offerings will be partially dependent on our ability to raise sufficient funds for such acquisitions, which is difficult to predict. We may be substantially delayed in making investments due to delays in the sale of our common shares, delays in negotiating or obtaining the necessary purchase documentation, delays in locating suitable investments or other factors. We expect to invest proceeds we receive from our offerings in short-term, highly-liquid investments until we use such funds in our operations and we do not expect the income we earn on these temporary investments will be substantial. Therefore, delays in investing proceeds we raise from our public offerings could impact our ability to generate cash flow for distributions.

If we purchase assets at a time when the commercial real estate market is experiencing substantial influxes of capital investment and competition for properties, the real estate we purchase may not appreciate or may decrease in value.

Over the last several years, the commercial real estate market has attracted a substantial influx of capital from investors. This substantial flow of capital, combined with significant competition for real estate, may have resulted in inflated purchase prices for such assets. We and the Core Fund have recently purchased assets in this environment, and to the extent either of us purchases real estate in the future in such an environment, we are subject to the risks that the value of our assets may not appreciate or may decrease significantly below the amount we paid for such assets. This could cause the value of our shareholders’ investments in our Company to be lower.

In our initial quarters of operations, distributions we paid to our shareholders were partially funded with advances or borrowings from our Advisor. We may use similar advances, borrowings, deferrals or waivers of fees from our Advisor or affiliates, or other sources in the future to fund distributions to our shareholders. We cannot assure shareholders that in the future we will be able to achieve cash flows necessary to repay such advances or borrowings and pay distributions at our historical per-share amounts, or to maintain distributions at any particular level, if at all.

We cannot assure shareholders that we will be able to continue paying distributions to our shareholders at our historical per-share amounts, or that the distributions we pay will not decrease or be eliminated in the future. In our initial quarters of operations, the distributions we received from the Core Fund and our net cash flow provided by or used in operating activities (before the payments of cash acquisition fees to our Advisor, which we fund with net offering proceeds) were insufficient to fund our distributions to shareholders and minority interests. As a result, our Advisor advanced funds to us to enable us to partially fund our distributions, and our Advisor has deferred, and in some cases forgiven, the reimbursement of such advances. As of December 31, 2007, other than with respect to amounts previously forgiven, we have reimbursed our Advisor for these advances. Our Advisor is under no obligation to advance funds to us in the future or to defer or waive fees in order to support our distributions. Please see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources — Cash Flows from Financing Activities — Distributions.”

If our Advisor or its affiliates were to refuse to advance funds to cover our expenses or defer or waive fees in the future, our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders could be adversely affected, and we may be unable to pay distributions to our shareholders, or such distributions could decrease significantly. In addition, our Advisor, banks or other financing sources may make loans or advances to us in order to allow us to pay future distributions to our shareholders. The ultimate repayment of this liability could adversely impact our ability to pay distributions in future periods as well as potentially adversely impact the value of our shares. In addition, our Advisor or affiliates could choose to receive shares of our common stock or interests in the operating partnership in lieu of cash fees to which they are entitled, and the issuance of such securities may dilute the interest of our shareholders.

14

We may need to incur borrowings that would otherwise not be incurred to meet REIT minimum distribution requirements.

In order to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we are required to distribute to our shareholders at least 90% of our annual ordinary taxable income. In addition, we will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the amount, if any, by which certain distributions paid (or deemed paid) by us with respect to any calendar year are less than the sum of (i) 85% of our ordinary income for that year, (ii) 95% of our capital gain net income for that year and (iii) 100% of our undistributed taxable income from prior years.

We expect our income, if any, to consist almost solely of our share of the Operating Partnership’s income, and the cash available for the payment of distributions by us to our shareholders will consist of our share of cash distributions made by the Operating Partnership. As the general partner of the Operating Partnership, we will determine the amount of any distributions made by the Operating Partnership. However, we must consider a number of factors in making such distributions, including:

•  the amount of the cash available for distribution;

•  the impact of such distribution on other partners of the Operating Partnership;

•  the Operating Partnership’s financial condition;

•  the Operating Partnership’s capital expenditure requirements and reserves therefore; and

•  the annual distribution requirements contained in the Code necessary to qualify and maintain our qualification as a REIT.

Differences in timing between the actual receipt of income and actual payment of deductible expenses and the inclusion of such income and deduction of such expenses when determining our taxable income, as well as the effect of nondeductible capital expenditures, the creation of reserves, the use of cash to purchase shares under our share redemption program or required debt amortization payments, could result in our having taxable income that exceeds cash available for distribution.

In view of the foregoing, we may be unable to meet the REIT minimum distribution requirementsand/or avoid the 4% excise tax described above. In certain cases, we may decide to borrow funds in order to meet the REIT minimum distributionand/or avoid the 4% excise tax even if our management believes that the then prevailing market conditions generally are not favorable for such borrowings or that such borrowings would not be advisable in the absence of such tax considerations.

We expect to acquire additional properties in the future, which, if unsuccessful, could adversely impact our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders.

We expect to acquire interests in additional properties in the future. We also expect that the Core Fund will acquire properties in the future. The acquisition of properties, or interests in properties by us or the Core Fund, will subject us to risks associated with owningand/or managing new properties, including tenant retention and tenant defaults of lease obligations. Specific examples of risks that could relate to acquisitions include:

•  risks that investments will fail to perform in accordance with our expectations because of conditions or liabilities we did not know about at the time of acquisition;

•  risks that projections or estimates we made with respect to the performance of the investments, the costs of operating or improving the properties or the effect of the economy or capital markets on the investments will prove inaccurate; and

•  general investment risks associated with any real estate investment.

15

We are subject to risks as the result of joint ownership of real estate with other Hines programs and third parties.

We have invested in properties and assets jointly with other Hines programs and with other third parties. We may also purchase or develop properties in joint ventures or partnerships, co-tenancies or other co-ownership arrangements with Hines affiliates, the sellers of the properties, developers or similar persons. Joint ownership of properties, under certain circumstances, may involve risks not otherwise present with other methods of owing real estate. Examples of these risks include:

•  the possibility that our partners or co-investors might become insolvent or bankrupt;

•  that such partners or co-investors might have economic or other business interests or goals that are inconsistent with our business interests or goals, including inconsistent goals relating to the sale of properties held in the joint venture or the timing of the termination and liquidation of the venture;

•  the possibility that we may incur liabilities as the result of actions taken by our partner or co-investor; or

•  that such partners or co-investors may be in a position to take actions contrary to our instructions or requests or contrary to our policies or objectives, including our policy with respect to qualifying and maintaining our qualification as a REIT.

Actions by a co-venturer, co-tenant or partner may result in subjecting the assets of the joint venture to unexpected liabilities. Under joint venture arrangements, neither co-venturer may have the power to control the venture, and under certain circumstances, an impasse could result and this impasse could have an adverse impact on the operations and profitability of the joint venture.

If we have a right of first refusal or buy/sell right to buy out a co-venturer or partner, we may be unable to finance such a buy-out if it becomes exercisable or we are required to purchase such interest at a time when it would not otherwise be in our best interest to do so. If our interest is subject to a buy/sell right, we may not have sufficient cash, available borrowing capacity or other capital resources to allow us to elect to purchase an interest of a co-venturer subject to the buy/sell right, in which case we may be forced to sell our interest as the result of the exercise of such right when we would otherwise prefer to keep our interest. Finally, we may not be able to sell our interest in a joint venture if we desire to exit the venture for any reason or if our interest is likewise subject to a right of first refusal of our co-venturer or partner, our ability to sell such interest may be adversely impacted by such right. Joint ownership arrangements with Hines affiliates may also entail conflicts of interest.

Our ability to redeem all or a portion of our investment in the Core Fund is subject to significant restrictions.

The Core Fund will only redeem up to 10% of its outstanding interests during any calendar year and the managing general partner of the Core Fund may limit redemptions as a result of certain tax and other regulatory considerations. We may not be able to exit the Core Fund or liquidate all or a portion of our interest in the Core Fund. Please see the risk factor captioned “— If the Core Fund is forced to sell its assets in order to satisfy mandatory redemption requirements, our investment in the Core Fund may be materially adversely affected” below.

If the Core Fund is forced to sell its assets in order to satisfy mandatory redemption requirements, our investment in the Core Fund may be materially adversely affected.

The Core Fund co-owns several buildings together with certain independent pension plans and funds (the “Institutional Co-Investors”) that are advised by General Motors Investment Management Corporation (the “Institutional Co-Investor Advisor”). Each entity formed to hold these buildings is required to redeem the interests held by the Institutional Co-Investors in such entity at dates ranging from August 19, 2012 to October 2, 2018. Additionally, the Institutional Co-Investor Advisor is entitled to co-investment rights for real estate assets in which the Core Fund invests. For each asset in which Institutional Co-Investors acquire

16

interests pursuant to the Institutional Co-Investor Advisor’s co-investment rights, the Core Fund will establish a three-year period ending no later than the twelfth anniversary of the date the asset is acquired during which the entity through which those Institutional Co-Investors co-invest in such asset will redeem such Institutional Co-Investors’ interests in such entity, unless the Institutional Co-Investors elect to extend such period. The Institutional Co-Investor Advisor also has certain buy/sell rights in entities in which the Institutional Co-Investors have co-invested with the Core Fund. Additionally, certain other investors in the Core Fund have rights to seek redemption of their interest in the Core Fund under certain circumstances.

We cannot assure our shareholders that the Core Fund will have capital available on favorable terms or at all to fund the redemption of the Institutional Co-Investors’ interest under these circumstances. If the Core Fund is not able to raise additional capital to meet such mandatory redemption requirements, the Core Fund may be required to sell assets that it would otherwise elect to retain or sell assets or otherwise raise capital on less than favorable terms or at a time when it would not otherwise do so. If the Core Fund is forced to sell any of its assets under such circumstances, the disposition of such assets could materially adversely impact the Core Fund’s operations and ability to make distributions to us and, consequently, our investment in the Core Fund.

If we invest in a limited partnership as a general partner, we could be responsible for all liabilities of such partnership.

In some joint ventures or other investments we may make, if the entity in which we invest is a limited partnership, we may acquire all or a portion of our interest in such partnership as a general partner. As a general partner, we could be liable for all the liabilities of such partnership. Additionally, we may acquire a general partner interest in the form of a non-managing general partner interest. For example, our interest in the Core Fund is in the form of a non-managing general partner interest. As a non-managing general partner, we are potentially liable for all liabilities of the partnership without having the same rights of management or control over the operation of the partnership as the managing general partner. Therefore, we may be held responsible for all of the liabilities of an entity in which we do not have full management rights or control, and our liability may far exceed the amount or value of investment we initially made or then had in the partnership.

Because of our inability to retain earnings, we will rely on debt and equity financings for acquisitions. If we do not have sufficient capital resources from such financings, our growth may be limited.

In order to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we are required to distribute to our shareholders at least 90% of our annual ordinary taxable income. This requirement limits our ability to retain income or cash flow from operations to finance the acquisition of new investments. We will explore acquisition opportunities from time to time with the intention of expanding our operations and increasing our profitability. We anticipate that we will use debt and equity financing for such acquisitions because of our inability to retain significant earnings. Consequently, if we cannot obtain debt or equity financing on acceptable terms, our ability to acquire new investments and expand our operations will be adversely affected.

Our use of borrowings to partially fund acquisitions and improvements on properties could result in foreclosures and unexpected debt service expenses upon refinancing, both of which could have an adverse impact on our operations and cash flow.

We intend to rely in part on borrowings under our credit facilities and other external sources of financing to fund the costs of new investments, capital expenditures and other items. Accordingly, we are subject to the risk that our cash flow will not be sufficient to cover required debt service payments.

If we cannot meet our required debt obligations, the property or properties subject to indebtedness could be foreclosed upon by, or otherwise transferred to, our lender, with a consequent loss of income and asset value to the Company. For tax purposes, a foreclosure of any of our properties would be treated as a sale of the property for a purchase price equal to the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage. If the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage exceeds our tax basis in the property, we would

17

recognize taxable income on foreclosure, but we may not receive any cash proceeds. Additionally, we may be required to refinance our debt subject to “lump sum” or “balloon” payment maturities on terms less favorable than the original loan or at a time we would otherwise prefer to not refinance such debt. A refinancing on such terms or at such times could increase our debt service payments, which would decrease the amount of cash we would have available for operations, new investments and distribution payments.

We have acquired and may acquire various financial instruments for purposes of “hedging” or reducing our risks, which may be costly and ineffective and could reduce our cash available for distribution to our shareholders.

We have acquired and may acquire various financial instruments for purposes of reducing our risks. Use of derivative instruments for hedging purposes may present significant risks, including the risk of loss of the amounts invested. Defaults by the other party to a hedging transaction can result in losses in the hedging transaction. Hedging activities also involve the risk of an imperfect correlation between the hedging instrument and the asset being hedged, which could result in losses both on the hedging transaction and on the asset being hedged. Use of hedging activities may not prevent significant losses and could increase the loss to our company. Further, hedging transactions may reduce cash available for distribution to our shareholders.

Our success will be dependent on the performance of Hines as well as key employees of Hines.

Our ability to achieve our investment objectives and to pay distributions is dependent upon the performance of Hines and its affiliates as well as key employees of Hines in the discovery and acquisition of investments, the selection of tenants, the determination of any financing arrangements, the management of our assets and operation of our day-to-day activities. Our board of directors and our Advisor have broad discretion when identifying, evaluating and making investments with the proceeds of the Current Offering.

Our shareholders will have no opportunity to evaluate the terms of transactions or other economic or financial data concerning our acquisitions. We will rely on the management ability of Hines and the oversight of our board of directors as well as the management of any entities or ventures in which we invest. If Hines or its affiliates (or any of their key employees) suffers or is distracted by adverse financial or operational problems in connection with its operations unrelated to us, the ability of Hines and its affiliates to allocate timeand/or resources to our operations may be adversely affected. If Hines is unable to allocate sufficient resources to oversee and perform our operations for any reason, our results of operations would be adversely impacted. The Core Fund is also managed by an affiliate of Hines. Its performance and success is also dependent on Hines and the Core Fund is likewise subject to these risks.

We operate in a competitive business, and many of our competitors have significant resources and operating flexibility, allowing them to compete effectively with us.

Numerous real estate companies that operate in the markets in which we operate or may operate in the future will compete with us in acquiring office and other properties and obtaining creditworthy tenants to occupy such properties. Such competition could adversely affect our business. There are numerous real estate companies, real estate investment trusts and U.S. institutional and foreign investors that will compete with us in seeking investments and tenants for properties. Many of these entities have significant financial and other resources, including operating experience, allowing them to compete effectively with us. In addition, our ability to charge premium rental rates to tenants may be negatively impacted. This increased competition may increase our costs of acquisitions or lower our occupancy rates and the rent we may charge tenants.

We depend on tenants for our revenue, and therefore our revenue is dependent on the success and economic viability of our tenants. Our reliance on single or significant tenants in certain buildings may decrease our ability to lease vacated space.

We expect that rental income from real property will, directly or indirectly, constitute substantially all of our income. The inability of a single major tenant or a number of smaller tenants to meet their rental obligations would adversely affect our income. Therefore, our financial success is indirectly dependent on the

18

success of the businesses operated by the tenants in our properties or in the properties securing mortgages we may own. Tenants may have the right to terminate their leases upon the occurrence of certain customary events of default and, in other circumstances, may not renew their leases or, because of market conditions, may be able to renew their leases on terms that are less favorable to us than the terms of the current leases. The weakening of the financial condition of a significant tenant or a number of smaller tenants and vacancies caused by defaults of tenants or the expiration of leases, may adversely affect our operations.

Some of our properties may be leased to a single or significant tenant and, accordingly, may be suited to the particular or unique needs of such tenant. We may have difficulty replacing such a tenant if the floor plan of the vacant space limits the types of businesses that can use the space without major renovation. In addition, the resale value of the property could be diminished because the market value of a particular property will depend principally upon the value of the leases of such property.

The bankruptcy or insolvency of a major tenant may adversely impact our operations and our ability to pay distributions.

The bankruptcy or insolvency of a significant tenant or a number of smaller tenants may have an adverse impact on our income and our ability to pay dividends. Generally, under bankruptcy law, a debtor tenant has 120 days to exercise the option of assuming or rejecting the obligations under any unexpired lease for nonresidential real property, which period may be extended once by the bankruptcy court. If the tenant assumes its lease, the tenant must cure all defaults under the lease and may be required to provide adequate assurance of its future performance under the lease. If the tenant rejects the lease, we will have a claim against the tenant’s bankruptcy estate. Although rent owing for the period between filing for bankruptcy and rejection of the lease may be afforded administrative expense priority and paid in full, pre-bankruptcy arrears and amounts owing under the remaining term of the lease will be afforded general unsecured claim status (absent collateral securing the claim). Moreover, amounts owing under the remaining term of the lease will be capped. Other than equity and subordinated claims, general unsecured claims are the last claims paid in a bankruptcy and therefore funds may not be available to pay such claims in full.

Unfavorable changes in economic conditions could adversely impact occupancy or rental rates

Economic conditions may significantly affect office building occupancy or rental rates. Occupancy and rental rates in the markets in which we operate, in turn, may have a material adverse impact on our cash flows, operating results and carrying value of investment property. The risks that may affect conditions in these markets include the following:

•  Changes in the national, regional and local economic climates;

•  Local conditions, such as an oversupply of office space or a reduction in demand for office space in the area;

•  A future economic downturn which simultaneously affects more than one of our geographical markets;

•  Increased operating costs, if these costs cannot be passed through to tenants.

National, regional and local economic climates may be adversely affected should population or job growth slow. To the extent either of these conditions occurs in the markets in which we operate, market rents will likely be affected. We could also face challenges related to adequately managing and maintaining our properties, should we experience increased operating costs. As a result, we may experience a loss of rental revenues, which may adversely affect our results of operations and our ability to satisfy our financial obligations and to pay distributions to our shareholders.

Uninsured losses relating to real property may adversely impact the value of our portfolio.

We attempt to ensure that all of our properties are adequately insured to cover casualty losses. However, there are types of losses, generally catastrophic in nature, which are uninsurable, are not economically insurable or are only insurable subject to limitations. Examples of such catastrophic events include acts of war

19

or terrorism, earthquakes, floods, hurricanes and pollution or environmental matters. We may not have adequate coverage in the event we or our buildings suffer casualty losses. If we do not have adequate insurance coverage, the value of our assets will be reduced as the result of, and to the extent of, any such uninsured losses. Additionally, we may not have access to capital resources to repair or reconstruct any uninsured damage to a property.

We may be unable to obtain desirable types of insurance coverage at a reasonable cost, if at all, and we may be unable to comply with insurance requirements contained in mortgage or other agreements due to high insurance costs.

We may not be able either to obtain certain desirable types of insurance coverage, such as terrorism insurance, or to obtain such coverage at a reasonable cost in the future, and this risk may inhibit our ability to finance or refinance debt secured by our properties. Additionally, we could default under debt or other agreements if the costand/or availability of certain types of insurance make it impractical or impossible to comply with covenants relating to the insurance we are required to maintain under such agreements. In such instances, we may be required to self-insure against certain losses or seek other forms of financial assurance.

Terrorist attacks and other acts of violence or war may affect the markets in which we operate, our operations and our profitability.

Terrorist attacks may negatively affect our operations and an investment in our shares. Such attacks or armed conflicts may directly impact the value of our properties through damage, destruction, loss or increased security costs. Hines has historically owned and managed office properties, generally in major metropolitan or suburban areas. We have also invested and expect that we will continue to invest in such properties. For example, the Core Fund owns interests in properties located in New York City and Washington, D.C. We and the Core Fund also own buildings in the central business districts of other major metropolitan cities. Insurance risks associated with potential acts of terrorism against office and other properties in major metropolitan areas could sharply increase the premiums we pay for coverage against property and casualty claims. Additionally, mortgage lenders in some cases have begun to insist that specific coverage against terrorism be purchased by commercial owners as a condition for providing loans. We may not be able to obtain insurance against the risk of terrorism because it may not be available or may not be available on terms that are economically feasible. We intend to obtain terrorism insurance, but the terrorism insurance that we obtain may not be sufficient to cover loss for damages to our properties as a result of terrorist attacks. In addition, certain losses resulting from these types of events are uninsurable and others may not be covered by our terrorism insurance. Terrorism insurance may not be available at a reasonable price or at all.

The consequences of any armed conflict are unpredictable, and we may not be able to foresee events that could have an adverse effect on our business or our shareholders’ investment.

More generally, any of these events could result in increased volatility in, or damage to, the United States and worldwide financial markets and economy. They also could result in a continuation of the current economic uncertainty in the United States or abroad. Our revenues will be dependent upon payment of rent by tenants, which may be particularly vulnerable to uncertainty in the local economy. Adverse economic conditions could affect the ability of our tenants to pay rent, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition, as well as our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders.

Our operations will be directly affected by general economic and regulatory factors we cannot control or predict.

Risks of investing in real estate include the possibility that our properties could decrease in value or will not generate income sufficient to meet operating expenses or will generate income and capital appreciation, if any, at rates lower than those anticipated or available through investments in comparable real estate or other investments. A significant number of the properties in which we own an interest and expect to acquire are office buildings located in major metropolitan or suburban areas. These types of properties, and the tenants that lease space in such properties, may be impacted to a greater extent by a national economic slowdown or

20

disruption when compared to other types of properties such as residential and retail properties. The following factors may affect income from such properties, our ability to sell properties and yields from investments in properties and are generally outside of our control:

•  conditions in financial markets and general economic conditions;

•  terrorist attacks and international instability;

•  natural disasters and acts of God;

•  over-building;

•  adverse national, state or local changes in applicable tax, environmental or zoning laws; and

•  a taking of any of our properties by eminent domain.

Volatility in debt markets could impact future acquisitions and values of real estate assets potentially reducing cash available for distribution to our shareholders.

The commercial real estate debt markets have recently been experiencing volatility as a result of certain factors including the tightening of underwriting standards by lenders and credit rating agencies and the significant inventory of unsold Collateralized Mortgage Backed Securities in the market. This has resulted in lenders decreasing the availability of debt financing as well as increasing the cost of debt financing. As our existing debt is either fixed rate debt or floating rate debt with a fixed spread over LIBOR, we do not believe that our current portfolio is materially impacted by the current debt market environment. However, should the reduced availability of debtand/or the increased cost of borrowings continue, either by increases in the index rates or by increases in lender spreads, we will need to include such factors in the economics of future acquisitions. This may result in future acquisitions generating lower overall economic returns and potentially reducing future cash flow available for distribution.

In addition, the state of debt markets could have an impact on the overall amount of capital investing in real estate which may result in price or value decreases of real estate assets. Although this may benefit us for future acquisitions, it could negatively impact the current value of our existing assets and could make it more difficult for us to sell any of our investments if we were to determine to do so.

We may have difficulty selling real estate investments, and our ability to distribute all or a portion of the net proceeds from such sale to our shareholders may be limited.

Equity real estate investments are relatively illiquid. We will have a limited ability to vary our portfolio in response to changes in economic or other conditions. We will also have a limited ability to sell assets in order to fund working capital and similar capital needs such as share redemptions. We expect to generally hold a property for the long term. When we sell any of our properties, we may not realize a gain on such sale or the amount of our taxable gain could exceed the cash proceeds we receive from such sale. We may not distribute any proceeds from the sale of properties to our shareholders; for example, we may use such proceeds to:

•  purchase additional properties;

•  repay debt;

•  buy out interests of any co-venturers or other partners in any joint venture in which we are a party;

•  purchase shares under our share redemption program;

•  fund distributions;

•  create working capital reserves; or

•  make repairs, maintenance, tenant improvements or other capital improvements or expenditures to our other properties.

21

Our ability to sell our properties may also be limited by our need to avoid a 100% penalty tax that is imposed on gain recognized by a REIT from the sale of property characterized as dealer property. In order to avoid such characterization and to take advantage of certain safe harbors under the Code, we may determine to hold our properties for a minimum period of time, generally four years.

Potential liability as the result of, and the cost of compliance with, environmental matters could adversely affect our operations.

Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of real property may be liable for the cost of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances on such property. Such laws often impose liability whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances.

While we invest primarily in institutional-quality office properties, we may also invest in properties historically used for industrial, manufacturing and commercial purposes. Some of these properties are more likely to contain, or may have contained, underground storage tanks for the storage of petroleum products and other hazardous or toxic substances. All of these operations create a potential for the release of petroleum products or other hazardous or toxic substances. Leasing properties to tenants that engage in industrial, manufacturing, and commercial activities will cause us to be subject to increased risk of liabilities under environmental laws and regulations. The presence of hazardous or toxic substances, or the failure to properly remediate these substances, may adversely affect our ability to sell, rent or pledge such property as collateral for future borrowings.

Environmental laws also may impose restrictions on the manner in which properties may be used or businesses may be operated, and these restrictions may require expenditures. Such laws may be amended so as to require compliance with stringent standards which could require us to make unexpected substantial expenditures. Environmental laws provide for sanctions in the event of noncompliance and may be enforced by governmental agencies or, in certain circumstances, by private parties. We may be potentially liable for such costs in connection with the acquisition and ownership of our properties in the United States. In addition, we may invest in properties located in countries that have adopted laws or observe environmental management standards that are less stringent than those generally followed in the United States, which may pose a greater risk that releases of hazardous or toxic substances have occurred to the environment. The cost of defending against claims of liability, of compliance with environmental regulatory requirements or of remediating any contaminated property could be substantial and require a material portion of our cash flow.

All of our properties will be subject to property taxes that may increase in the future, which could adversely affect our cash flow.

Our properties are subject to real and personal property taxes that may increase as property tax rates change and as the properties are assessed or reassessed by taxing authorities. We anticipate that most of our leases will generally provide that the property taxes, or increases therein, are charged to the lessees as an expense related to the properties that they occupy. As the owner of the properties, however, we are ultimately responsible for payment of the taxes to the government. If property taxes increase, our tenants may be unable to make the required tax payments, ultimately requiring us to pay the taxes. In addition, we will generally be responsible for property taxes related to any vacant space. If we purchase residential properties, the leases for such properties typically will not allow us to pass through real estate taxes and other taxes to residents of such properties. Consequently, any tax increases may adversely affect our results of operations at such properties.

Our costs associated with complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act may affect cash available for distributions.

Our properties are generally expected to be subject to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (the “ADA”). Under the ADA, all places of public accommodation are required to comply with federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. The ADA has separate compliance requirements for “public accommodations” and “commercial facilities” that generally require that buildings and services be

22

made accessible and available to people with disabilities. The ADA’s requirements could require removal of access barriers and could result in the imposition of injunctive relief, monetary penalties or, in some cases, an award of damages. We attempt to acquire properties that comply with the ADA or place the burden on the seller or other third-party, such as a tenant, to ensure compliance with the ADA. However, we may not be able to acquire properties or allocate responsibilities in this manner. If we cannot, our funds used for ADA compliance may affect cash available for distributions and the amount of distributions to our shareholders.

If we set aside insufficient working capital reserves, we may be required to defer necessary or desirable property improvements.

If we do not establish sufficient reserves for working capital to supply necessary funds for capital improvements or similar expenses, we may be required to defer necessary or desirable improvements to our properties. If we defer such improvements, the applicable properties may decline in value, it may be more difficult for us to attract or retain tenants to such properties or the amount of rent we can charge at such properties may decrease.

We are subject to additional risks from our international investments.

We own a mixed-use office and retail complex in Toronto, Ontario and have an indirect interest in an industrial property in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. We may purchase additional properties located outside the United States and may make or purchase loans or participations in loans secured by property located outside the United States. These investments may be affected by factors peculiar to the laws and business practices of the jurisdictions in which the properties are located. These laws and business practices may expose us to risks that are different from and in addition to those commonly found in the United States. Foreign investments pose the following risks:

•  the burden of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws, including:

•  changing governmental rules and policies, including changes in land use and zoning laws, more stringent environmental laws or changes in such laws; and

•  existing or new laws relating to the foreign ownership of real property or mortgages and laws restricting the ability of foreign persons or companies to remove profits earned from activities within the country to the person’s or company’s country of origin;

•  the potential for expropriation;

•  possible currency transfer restrictions;

•  imposition of adverse or confiscatory taxes;

•  changes in real estate and other tax rates and changes in other operating expenses in particular countries;

•  possible challenges to the anticipated tax treatment of the structures that allow us to acquire and hold investments;

•  adverse market conditions caused by terrorism, civil unrest and changes in national or local governmental or economic conditions;

•  the willingness of domestic or foreign lenders to make mortgage loans in certain countries and changes in the availability, cost and terms of mortgage funds resulting from varying national economic policies;

•  general political and economic instability in certain regions;

•  the potential difficulty of enforcing obligations in other countries; and

•  Hines’ limited experience and expertise in foreign countries relative to its experience and expertise in the United States.

23

Investments in properties outside the United States may subject us to foreign currency risks, which may adversely affect distributions and our REIT status.

Our investments outside the United States may be subject to foreign currency risk due to potential fluctuations in exchange rates between foreign currencies and the U.S. dollar. As a result, changes in exchange rates of any such foreign currency to U.S. dollars may affect our revenues, operating margins and distributions and may also affect the book value of our assets and the amount of shareholders’ equity.

Changes in foreign currency exchange rates used to value a REIT’s foreign assets may be considered changes in the value of the REIT’s assets. These changes may adversely affect our status as a REIT. Further, bank accounts in foreign currency which are not considered cash or cash equivalents may adversely affect our status as a REIT.

Retail properties depend on anchor tenants to attract shoppers and could be adversely affected by the loss of a key anchor tenant.

We own properties with retail components and we may acquire more retail properties in the future. As with our office properties, we are subject to the risk that tenants may be unable to make their lease payments or may decline to extend a lease upon its expiration. A lease termination by a tenant that occupies a large area of a retail center (commonly referred to as an anchor tenant) could impact leases of other tenants. Other tenants may be entitled to modify the terms of their existing leases in the event of a lease termination by an anchor tenant, or the closure of the business of an anchor tenant that leaves its space vacant even if the anchor tenant continues to pay rent. Any such modifications or conditions could be unfavorable to us as the property owner and could decrease rents or expense recoveries. Additionally, major tenant closures may result in decreased customer traffic, which could lead to decreased sales at other stores. In the event of default by a tenant or anchor store, we may experience delays and costs in enforcing our rights as landlord to recover amounts due to us under the terms of our agreements with those parties.

If we make or invest in loans, our loans may be impacted by unfavorable real estate market conditions, which could decrease the value of our loan investments.

If we make or invest in loans, we will be at risk of defaults by the borrowers on those loans. These defaults may be caused by many conditions beyond our control, including interest rate levels and local and other economic conditions affecting real estate values. With respect to loans secured by real property, we will not know whether the values of the properties securing the loans will remain at the levels existing on the dates of origination of the loans. If the values of the underlying properties drop, our risk will increase because of the lower value of the security associated with such loans.

If we make or invest in loans, our loans will be subject to interest rate fluctuations, which could reduce our returns as compared to market interest rates as well as the value of the mortgage loans in the event we sell the loans.

If we invest in fixed-rate, long-term loans and interest rates rise, the loans could yield a return that is lower than then-current market rates. If interest rates decrease, we will be adversely affected to the extent that loans are prepaid, because we may not be able to make new loans at the previously higher interest rate. If we invest in variable interest rate loans, if interest rates decrease, our revenues will likewise decrease. Finally, if interest rates increase, the value of loans we own at such time would decrease which would lower the proceeds we would receive in the event we sell such assets.

Delays in liquidating defaulted loans could reduce our investment returns.

If there are defaults under our loans secured by real property, we may not be able to repossess and sell the underlying properties quickly. The resulting time delay could reduce the value of our investment in the defaulted loans. An action to foreclose on a property securing a loan is regulated by state statutes and rules and is subject to many of the delays and expenses of other lawsuits if the defendant raises defenses or counterclaims. In the event of default by a borrower, these restrictions, among other things, may impede our

24

ability to foreclose on or sell the secured property or to obtain proceeds sufficient to repay all amounts due to us on the loan.

We may make or invest in mezzanine loans, which involve greater risks of loss than senior loans secured by real properties.

We may make or invest in mezzanine loans that generally take the form of subordinated loans secured by second mortgages on the underlying real property or loans secured by a pledge of the ownership interests of an entity that directly or indirectly owns real property. These types of investments involve a higher degree of risk than long-term senior mortgage loans secured by real property because the investment may become unsecured as a result of foreclosure by the senior lender. In the event of a bankruptcy of the entity providing the pledge of its ownership interests as security, we may not have full recourse to the assets of such entity, or the assets of the entity may not be sufficient to satisfy our mezzanine loan. If a borrower defaults on our mezzanine loan or debt senior to our mezzanine loan, or in the event of a borrower bankruptcy, our mezzanine loan will be satisfied only after the senior debt. As a result, we may not recover some or all of our investment. In addition, mezzanine loans may have higher loan-to-value ratios than traditional mortgage loans, resulting in less equity in the real property and increasing our risk of loss of principal.

Our investment policies may change without shareholder approval, which could not only alter the nature of your investment but also subject your investment to new and additional risks.

Except as otherwise provided in our organizational documents, our investment policies and the methods of implementing our investment objectives and policies may be altered by a majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors, without the approval of our shareholders. We may invest in different property typesand/or use different structures to make such investments than we have historically. Please see “— We will be subject to risks as the result of joint ownership of real estate with other Hines programs or third parties.” As a result, the nature of your investment could change indirectly without your consent and become subject to risks not described in this report.

Potential Conflicts of Interest Risks

We compete with affiliates of Hines for real estate investment opportunities. Some of these affiliates have preferential rights to accept or reject certain investment opportunities in advance of our right to accept or reject such opportunities. Many of the preferential rights we have to accept or reject investment opportunities are subordinate to the preferential rights of at least one affiliate of Hines.

Hines has existing programs with investment objectives and strategies similar to ours. Because we compete with these entities for investment opportunities, Hines faces conflicts of interest in allocating investment opportunities between us and these other entities. We have limited rights to specific investment opportunities located by Hines. Some of these entities have a priority right over other Hines entities, including us, to accept investment opportunities that meet certain defined investment criteria. For example, the Core Fund and other entities sponsored by Hines have the right to accept or reject investments in office properties located in the United States before we have the right to accept such opportunities. Because we and other Hines entities intend to invest primarily in such properties and rely on Hines to present us with investment opportunities, these rights will reduce our investment opportunities. We therefore may not be able to accept, or we may only invest indirectly with or through another Hines affiliated-entity in, certain investments we otherwise would make directly. To the extent we invest in opportunities with another entity affiliated with Hines, we may not have the control over such investment we would otherwise have if we owned all of or otherwise controlled such assets. Please see “— Business and Real Estate Risks — We will be subject to risks as the result of joint ownership of real estate with other Hines programs or third parties” above.

Other than the rights described in the “Conflicts of Interest — Investment Opportunity Allocation Procedure” section of our current prospectus, we do not have rights to specific investment opportunities located by Hines. In addition, our right to participate in the allocation process described in such section will terminate once we have fully invested the proceeds of our Current Offering or if we are no longer advised by

25

an affiliate of Hines. For investment opportunities not covered by the allocation procedure described herein, Hines will decide in its discretion, subject to any priority rights it grants or has granted to other Hines-managed or otherwise affiliated programs, how to allocate such opportunities among us, Hines and other programs or entities sponsored or managed by or otherwise affiliated with Hines. Because we do not have a right to accept or reject any investment opportunities before Hines or one or more Hines affiliates have the right to accept such opportunities, and are otherwise subject to Hines’ discretion as to the investment opportunities we will receive, we may not be able to reviewand/or invest in opportunities which we would otherwise pursue if we were the only program sponsored by Hines or had a priority right in regard to such investments. We are subject to the risk that, as a result of the conflicts of interest between Hines, us and other entities or programs sponsored or managed by or affiliated with Hines, and the priority rights Hines has granted or may in the future grant to any such other entities or programs, we may not be offered favorable investment opportunities located by Hines when it would otherwise be in our best interest to accept such investment opportunities and our results of operations and ability to pay distributions may be adversely impacted thereby.

We may compete with other entities affiliated with Hines for tenants.

Hines and its affiliates are not prohibited from engaging, directly or indirectly, in any other business or from possessing interests in any other business venture or ventures, including businesses and ventures involved in the acquisition, development, ownership, management, leasing or sale of real estate projects. Hines or its affiliates ownand/or manage properties in most if not all geographical areas in which we own or expect to acquire interests in real estate assets. Therefore, our properties compete for tenants with other properties ownedand/or managed by Hines and its affiliates. Hines may face conflicts of interest when evaluating tenant opportunities for our properties and other properties ownedand/or managed by Hines and its affiliates and these conflicts of interest may have a negative impact on our ability to attract and retain tenants.

Employees of the Advisor and Hines will face conflicts of interest relating to time management and allocation of resources and investment opportunities.

We do not have employees. Pursuant to a contract with Hines, the Advisor relies on employees of Hines and its affiliates to manage and operate our business. Hines is not restricted from acquiring, developing, operating, managing, leasing or selling real estate through entities other than us and Hines will continue to be actively involved in real estate operations and activities other than our operations and activities. Hines currently controlsand/or operates other entities that own properties in many of the markets in which we will seek to invest. Hines spends a material amount of time managing these properties and other assets unrelated to our business. Our business may suffer as a result because we lack the ability to manage it without the time and attention of Hines’ employees.

Hines and its affiliates are general partners and sponsors of other real estate programs having investment objectives and legal and financial obligations similar to ours. Because Hines and its affiliates have interests in other real estate programs and also engage in other business activities, they may have conflicts of interest in allocating their time and resources among our business and these other activities. Our officers and directors, as well as those of the Advisor, own equity interests in entities affiliated with Hines from which we may buy properties. These individuals may make substantial profits in connection with such transactions, which could result in conflicts of interest. Likewise, such individuals could make substantial profits as the result of investment opportunities allocated to entities affiliated with Hines other than us. As a result of these interests, they could pursue transactions that may not be in our best interest. Also, if Hines suffers financial or operational problems as the result of any of its activities, whether or not related to our business, its ability to operate our business could be adversely impacted. During times of intense activity in other programs and ventures, they may devote less time and resources to our business than is necessary or desirable.

Hines may face conflicts of interest if it sells properties it acquires or develops to us.

We have acquired, and may in the future acquire properties from Hines and affiliates of Hines. Likewise, the Core Fund has acquired, and may in the future acquire, properties from Hines and affiliates of Hines. We

26

may acquire properties Hines currently owns or hereafter acquires from third parties. Hines may also develop properties and then sell the completed properties to us. Similarly, we may provide development loans to Hines in connection with these developments. Hines, its affiliates and its employees (including our officers and directors) may make substantial profits in connection with such transactions. Hines may owe fiduciaryand/or other duties to the selling entity in these transactions and conflicts of interest between us and the selling entities could exist in such transactions. Because we are relying on Hines, these conflicts could result in transactions based on terms that are less favorable to us than we would receive from a third party.

Hines may face a conflict of interest when determining whether we should dispose of any property we own that is managed by Hines because Hines may lose fees associated with the management of the property.

We expect that Hines will manage most, if not all, of the properties we acquire directly as well as most, if not all, of the properties in which we acquire an indirect interest as a result of investments in Hines affiliated entities such as the Core Fund. Because Hines receives significant fees for managing these properties, it may face a conflict of interest when determining whether we should sell properties under circumstances where Hines would no longer manage the property after the transaction. As a result of this conflict of interest, we may not dispose of properties when it would be in our best interests to do so.

Hines may face conflicts of interest in connection with the management of our day-to-day operations and in the enforcement of agreements between Hines and its affiliates.

Hines and the Advisor manage our day-to-day operations and properties pursuant to property management agreements and an advisory agreement. These agreements were not negotiated at arm’s length and certain fees payable by us under such agreements are paid regardless of our performance. Hines and its affiliates may be in a conflict of interest position as to matters relating to these agreements. Examples include the computation of fees and reimbursements under such agreements, the enforcementand/or termination of the agreements and the priority of payments to third parties as opposed to amounts paid to affiliates of Hines. These fees may be higher than fees charged by third parties in an arm’s-length transaction as a result of these conflicts.

Certain of our officers and directors face conflicts of interest relating to the positions they hold with other entities.

Certain of our officers and directors are also officers and directors of the Advisor and other entities controlled by Hines such as the managing general partner of the Core Fund. Some of these entities may compete with us for investment and leasing opportunities. These personnel owe fiduciary duties to these other entities and their security holders and these duties may from time to time conflict with the fiduciary duties such individuals owe to us and our shareholders. For example, conflicts of interest adversely affecting our investment decisions could arise in decisions or activities related to:

•  the allocation of new investments among us and other entities operated by Hines;

•  the allocation of time and resources among us and other entities operated by Hines;

•  the timing and terms of the investment in or sale of an asset;

•  investments with Hines and affiliates of Hines;

•  the compensation paid to our Advisor; and

•  our relationship with Hines in the management of our properties.

These conflicts of interest may also be impacted by the fact that such individuals may have compensation structures tied to the performance of such other entities controlled by Hines and these compensation structures may potentially provide for greater remuneration in the event an investment opportunity is presented to a Hines affiliate rather than us.

27

Our officers and directors have limited liability.

Generally, we are obligated under our charter and the bylaws to indemnify our officers and directors against certain liabilities incurred in connection with their services. We have also executed indemnification agreements with each officer and director and agreed to indemnify them for any such liabilities that they incur. These indemnification agreements, as well as the indemnification provisions in our charter and bylaws could limit our ability and the ability of our shareholders to effectively take action against our officers and directors arising from their service to us. In addition, there could be a potential reduction in distributions resulting from our payment of premiums associated with insurance or payments of a defense settlement or claim.

Our UPREIT structure may result in potential conflicts of interest.

Persons holding OP Units have the right to vote on certain amendments to the Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership, as well as on certain other matters. Persons holding such voting rights may exercise them in a manner that conflicts with the interests of our shareholders. As general partner of the Operating Partnership, we will be obligated to act in a manner that is in the best interest of all partners of the Operating Partnership. Circumstances may arise in the future when the interests of limited partners in the Operating Partnership may conflict with the interests of our shareholders.

Tax Risks

If we fail to qualify as a REIT, our operations and our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders would be adversely impacted.

We believe we qualify as a REIT under the Code. A REIT generally is not taxed at the corporate level on income it currently distributes to its shareholders. Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex rules for which there are only limited judicial or administrative interpretations. The determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control may affect our ability to continue to qualify as a REIT. In addition, new legislation, regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions could significantly change the tax laws with respect to qualification as a REIT or the federal income tax consequences of such qualification.

Investments in foreign real property may be subject to foreign currency gains and losses. Foreign currency gains may not be qualifying income for purposes of the REIT income requirements. To reduce the risk of foreign currency gains adversely affecting our REIT qualification, we may be required to defer the repatriation of cash from foreign jurisdictions or to employ other structures that could affect the timing, character or amount of income we receive from our foreign investments. No assurance can be given that we will be able to manage our foreign currency gains in a manner that enables us to qualify as a REIT or to avoid U.S. federal and other taxes on our income as a result of foreign currency gains.

If we were to fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year:

•  we would not be allowed to deduct our distributions to our shareholders when computing our taxable income;

•  we would be subject to federal income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on our taxable income at regular corporate rates;

•  we would be disqualified from being taxed as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification was lost, unless entitled to relief under certain statutory provisions;

•  our cash available for distribution would be reduced and we would have less cash to distribute to our shareholders; and

•  we might be required to borrow additional funds or sell some of our assets in order to pay corporate tax obligations we may incur as a result of our disqualification.

28

If the Operating Partnership is classified as a “publicly traded partnership” under the Code, our operations and our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders could be adversely affected.

We structured the Operating Partnership so that it would be classified as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. In this regard, the Code generally classifies “publicly traded partnerships” (as defined in Section 7704 of the Code) as associations taxable as corporations (rather than as partnerships), unless substantially all of their taxable income consists of specified types of passive income. In order to minimize the risk that the Code would classify the Operating Partnership as a “publicly traded partnership” for tax purposes, we placed certain restrictions on the transferand/or redemption of partnership units in the Operating Partnership. Please see “— If we fail to qualify as a REIT, our operations and ability to pay distributions to our shareholders would be adversely impacted” above. In addition, the imposition of a corporate tax on the Operating Partnership would reduce our amount of cash available for distribution to our shareholders.

Distributions to tax-exempt investors may be classified as unrelated business taxable income.

Neither ordinary nor capital gain distributions with respect to our common shares nor gain from the sale of common shares should generally constitute unrelated business taxable income to a tax-exempt investor. However, there are certain exceptions to this rule. In particular:

•  part of the income and gain recognized by certain qualified employee pension trusts with respect to our common shares may be treated as unrelated business taxable income if our stock is predominately held by qualified employee pension trusts, we are required to rely on a special look through rule for purposes of meeting one of the REIT stock ownership tests, and we are not operated in such a manner as to otherwise avoid treatment of such income or gain as unrelated business taxable income;

•  part of the income and gain recognized by a tax exempt investor with respect to our common shares would constitute unrelated business taxable income if such investor incurs debt in order to acquire the common shares; and

•  part or all of the income or gain recognized with respect to our common shares by social clubs, voluntary employee benefit associations, supplemental unemployment benefit trusts and qualified group legal services plans which are exempt from federal income taxation under Sections 501(c)(7), (9), (17), or (20) of the Code may be treated as unrelated business taxable income.

Investors may realize taxable income without receiving cash distributions.

If shareholders participate in the dividend reinvestment plan, they will be required to take into account, in computing their taxable income, ordinary and capital gain distributions allocable to shares they own, even though they receive no cash because such distributions are reinvested. In addition, the difference between the public offering price of our shares and the amount paid for shares purchased pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan may be deemed to be taxable as income to participants in the plan.

Foreign investors may be subject to FIRPTA tax on sale of common shares if we are unable to qualify as a “domestically controlled” REIT.

A foreign person disposing of a U.S. real property interest, including shares of a U.S. corporation whose assets consist principally of U.S. real property interests is generally subject to a tax, known as FIRPTA tax, on the gain recognized on the disposition. Such FIRPTA tax does not apply, however, to the disposition of stock in a REIT if the REIT is “domestically controlled.” A REIT is “domestically controlled” if less than 50% of the REIT’s capital stock, by value, has been owned directly or indirectly by persons who are not qualifying U.S. persons during a continuous five-year period ending on the date of disposition or, if shorter, during the entire period of the REIT’s existence.

We cannot assure our shareholders that we will qualify as a “domestically controlled” REIT. If we were to fail to so qualify, gain realized by foreign investors on a sale of our common shares would be subject to FIRPTA tax, unless our common shares were traded on an established securities market and the foreign

29

investor did not at any time during a specified testing period directly or indirectly own more than 5% of the value of our outstanding common shares.

In certain circumstances, we may be subject to federal and state income taxes as a REIT or other state or local income taxes, which would reduce our cash available to pay distributions to our shareholders.

Even if we qualify and maintain our status as a REIT, we may be subject to federal income taxes or state taxes. For example, if we have net income from a “prohibited transaction,” such income will be subject to a 100% tax. We may not be able to make sufficient distributions to avoid paying federal income taxand/or the 4% excise tax that generally applies to income retained by a REIT. We may also decide to retain income we earn from the sale or other disposition of our property and pay income tax directly on such income. In that event, our shareholders would be treated as if they earned that income and paid the tax on it directly. However, shareholders that are tax-exempt, such as charities or qualified pension plans, would have no benefit from their deemed payment of such tax liability. We may also be subject to state and local taxes on our income or property, either directly or at the level of the Operating Partnership or at the level of the other companies through which we indirectly own our assets.

Entities through which we hold foreign real estate investments will, in most cases, be subject to foreign taxes, notwithstanding our status as a REIT.

Even if we maintain our status as a REIT, entities through which we hold investments in assets located outside the United States will, in most cases, be subject to income taxation by jurisdictions in which such assets are located. Our cash available for distribution to our shareholders will be reduced by any such foreign income taxes.

Recently enacted tax legislation may make REIT investments comparatively less attractive than investments in other corporate entities.

Under recently enacted tax legislation, the tax rate applicable to qualifying corporate dividends received by individuals prior to 2009 has been reduced to a maximum rate of 15%. This special tax rate is generally not applicable to distributions paid by a REIT, unless such distributions represent earnings on which the REIT itself has been taxed. As a result, distributions (other than capital gain distributions) paid by us to individual investors will generally be subject to the tax rates that are otherwise applicable to ordinary income which currently are as high as 35%. This law change may make an investment in our common shares comparatively less attractive relative to an investment in the shares of other corporate entities which pay distributions that are not formed as REITs.

Item 1B.   Unresolved Staff Comments

Not applicable.

30

Item 2.   Properties

As of December 31, 2007, we owned interests in 39 office properties located throughout the United States, one mixed-use office and retail complex in Toronto, Ontario and one industrial property in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. These properties contain, in the aggregate, 22.8 million square feet of leasable space, and we believe each property is suitable for its intended purpose. The following tables provide summary information regarding the properties in which we owned interests as of December 31, 2007.

Direct Investments

		Leasable			Percent			Our Effective
Property	City	Square Feet			Leased			Ownership(1)
321 North Clark	Chicago, Illinois		885,664			99	%		100	%
Citymark	Dallas, Texas		220,079			100	%		100	%
JPMorgan Chase Tower	Dallas, Texas		1,242,590			91	%		100	%
Watergate Tower IV	Emeryville, California		344,433			100	%		100	%
One Wilshire	Los Angeles, California		661,553			99	%		100	%
3 Huntington Quadrangle	Melville, New York		407,731			87	%		100	%
Airport Corporate Center	Miami, Florida		1,021,397			90	%		100	%
Minneapolis Office/Flex Portfolio	Minneapolis, Minnesota		766,240			85	%		100	%
3400 Data Drive	Rancho Cordova, California		149,703			100	%		100	%
Daytona Buildings	Redmond, Washington		251,313			93	%		100	%
Laguna Buildings	Redmond, Washington		464,701			100	%		100	%
1515 S Street	Sacramento, California		348,881			100	%		100	%
1900 and 2000 Alameda	San Mateo, California		253,377			96	%		100	%
Seattle Design Center	Seattle, Washington		390,684			84	%		100	%
5th and Bell	Seattle, Washington		197,135			98	%		100	%
Atrium on Bay	Toronto, Ontario		1,070,287			95	%		100	%
Total for Directly-Owned Properties			8,675,768			94	%
Indirect Investments
Core Fund Investment
One Atlantic Center	Atlanta, Georgia		1,100,312			84	%		27.47	%
The Carillon Building	Charlotte, North Carolina		470,726			100	%		27.47	%
Charlotte Plaza	Charlotte, North Carolina		625,026			97	%		27.47	%
Three First National Plaza	Chicago, Illinois		1,419,978			94	%		21.97	%
333 West Wacker	Chicago, Illinois		845,194			87	%		21.92	%
One Shell Plaza	Houston, Texas		1,228,160			98	%		13.73	%
Two Shell Plaza	Houston, Texas		566,982			95	%		13.73	%
425 Lexington Avenue	New York, New York		700,034			100	%		12.98	%
499 Park Avenue	New York, New York		288,722			100	%		12.98	%
600 Lexington Avenue	New York, New York		283,311			95	%		12.98	%
Renaissance Square	Phoenix, Arizona		965,508			95	%		27.47	%
Riverfront Plaza	Richmond, Virginia		949,791			100	%		27.47	%
Johnson Ranch Corporate Center	Roseville, California		179,990			76	%		21.92	%
Roseville Corporate Center	Roseville, California		111,418			94	%		21.92	%
Summit at Douglas Ridge	Roseville, California		185,128			85	%		21.92	%
Olympus Corporate Center	Roseville, California		191,494			59	%		21.92	%
Douglas Corporate Center	Roseville, California		214,606			85	%		21.92	%
Wells Fargo Center	Sacramento, California		502,365			93	%		21.92	%
525 B Street	San Diego, California		447,159			90	%		27.47	%
The KPMG Building	San Francisco, California		379,328			100	%		27.47	%
101 Second Street	San Francisco, California		388,370			100	%		27.47	%
720 Olive Way	Seattle, Washington		300,710			93	%		21.92	%
1200 19th Street	Washington, D.C.		328,154	(2)		28	%		12.98	%
Warner Center	Woodland Hills, California		808,274			97	%		21.92	%
Total for Core Fund Properties			13,480,740			92	%
Other
Distribution Park Rio	Rio de Janeiro, Brazil		693,115			100	%		50	%
Total for All Properties			22,849,623			93	%

31

(1)

This percentage shows the effective ownership of the Operating Partnership in the properties listed. On December 31, 2007, Hines REIT owned a 97.6% interest in the Operating Partnership as its sole general partner. Affiliates of Hines owned the remaining 2.4% interest in the Operating Partnership. Our interest in Distribution Park Rio is owned through our investment in a joint venture with a Hines affiliate. We own interests in all of the properties other than those identified above as being owned 100% by us and Distribution Park Rio through our interest in the Core Fund, in which we owned an approximate 32.0% non-managing general partner interest as of December 31, 2007. The Core Fund does not own 100% of these buildings; its ownership interest in its buildings ranges from 40.6% to 85.9%.

(2)

This square footage amount includes three floors which are being added to the building and are currently under construction. The construction is expected to be completed in 2009.

Lease Expirations

Directly-Owned Properties

The following table lists, on an aggregate basis, all of the scheduled lease expirations for each of the years ending December 31, 2008 through December 31, 2017 and thereafter for the 16 properties we owned directly as of December 31, 2007. The table shows the approximate leasable square feet represented by the applicable lease expirations:

			Leasable Area
	Number of		Approximate		Percent of Total
Year	Leases		Square Feet		Leasable Area
Vacant		—		519,683		6.0	%
2008		121		698,108		8.0	%
2009		80		803,660		9.3	%
2010		97		707,194		8.2	%
2011		67		621,148		7.2	%
2012		48		1,280,171		14.8	%
2013		19		1,156,130		13.3	%
2014		20		296,777		3.4	%
2015		11		372,805		4.3	%
2016		9		457,286		5.3	%
2017		19		421,201		4.9	%
Thereafter		12		1,327,529		15.3	%

32

Indirectly-Owned Properties

The following table lists, on an aggregate basis, all of the scheduled lease expirations for each of the years ending December 31, 2008 through December 31, 2017 and thereafter for the 25 properties in which we owned an indirect interest as of December 31, 2007. The table shows the approximate leasable square feet represented by the applicable lease expirations:

			Leasable Area
	Number of		Approximate		Percent of Total
Year	Leases		Square Feet		Leasable Area
Vacant		—		1,073,257		7.6	%
2008		130		776,961		5.5	%
2009		127		1,338,325		9.5	%
2010		105		1,044,665		7.4	%
2011		85		1,295,285		9.2	%
2012		87		1,075,849		7.6	%
2013		47		1,665,981		11.8	%
2014		34		656,665		4.7	%
2015		25		2,142,948		15.2	%
2016		21		440,218		3.1	%
2017		18		475,964		3.4	%
Thereafter		38		2,098,617		15.0	%

All Properties

The following table lists our pro-rata share of the scheduled lease expirations for each of the years ending December 31, 2008 through December 31, 2017 and thereafter for all of the properties in which we owned an interest as of December 31, 2007. The table shows the approximate leasable square feet represented by the applicable lease expirations:

			Leasable Area
	Number of		Approximate		Percent of Total
Year	Leases		Square Feet(1)		Leasable Area(1)
Vacant		—		1,592,940		7.0	%
2008		251		1,475,069		6.5	%
2009		207		2,141,985		9.4	%
2010		202		1,751,859		7.7	%
2011		152		1,916,433		8.4	%
2012		135		2,356,020		10.4	%
2013		66		2,822,111		12.4	%
2014		54		953,442		4.2	%
2015		36		2,515,753		11.1	%
2016		30		897,504		3.9	%
2017		37		897,165		3.9	%
Thereafter		50		3,426,146		15.1	%

(1) These amounts represent our pro-rata share based on our effective ownership in each of the properties as of December 31, 2007.

33

Market Concentration

The following table provides a summary of the market concentration of our portfolio based on our pro-rata share of the market value⁽³⁾ in each of the properties in which we owned interests as of December 31, 2007:

	Market			Market
	Concentration:			Concentration:			Market
	Directly-Owned			Indirectly-Owned			Concentration:
City	Properties			Properties(1)			All Properties(2)
Chicago, Illinois		12	%		11	%		12	%
Seattle, Washington		17	%		2	%		12	%
Los Angeles, California		14	%		7	%		12	%
Dallas, Texas		16	%		—			11	%
Toronto, Ontario		10	%		—			8	%
Sacramento, California		5	%		11	%		7	%
New York, New York		4	%		14	%		6	%
Miami, Florida		8	%		—			5	%
San Francisco, California		3	%		12	%		5	%
Emeryville, California		7	%		—			5	%
Phoenix, Arizona		—			7	%		2	%
Minneapolis, Minnesota		4	%		—			3	%
Richmond, Virginia		—			7	%		3	%
Charlotte, North Carolina		—			8	%		3	%
Atlanta, Georgia		—			8	%		3	%
Houston, Texas		—			6	%		1	%
San Diego, California		—			4	%		1	%
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil		—			1	%		1	%
Washington, D.C.		—			2	%		—

(1)	These amounts represent the properties in which we owned an indirect interest through our investment in the Core Fund and our joint venture in Brazil as of December 31, 2007. All amounts are based on our effective ownership interest in each property as of December 31, 2007.
(2)	These amounts represent all properties in which we owned an interest based on our effective ownership interest in each property as of December 31, 2007.
(3)	The estimated value of each property was based on the most recent appraisals available or the purchase price, in the case of recent acquisitions.

34

Industry Concentration

The following table provides a summary of the industry concentration of the tenants of the properties in which we owned interests based on our pro-rata share of their leased square footage as of December 31, 2007:

	Industry			Industry
	Concentration:			Concentration:			Industry
	Directly-Owned			Indirectly-Owned			Concentration:
Industry	Properties			Properties(1)			All Properties(2)
Finance and Insurance		21	%		25	%		22	%
Legal		12	%		34	%		17	%
Information		15	%		4	%		10	%
Health Care		6	%		1	%		6	%
Government		8	%		4	%		6	%
Manufacturing		11	%		1	%		6	%
Other		6	%		7	%		6	%
Professional Services		4	%		6	%		5	%
Construction		3	%		1	%		4	%
Transportation and Warehousing		1	%		5	%		4	%
Other Services		3	%		1	%		4	%
Accounting		2	%		5	%		3	%
Wholesale Trade		4	%		—			3	%
Oil & Gas/Energy		1	%		6	%		2	%
Arts, Entertainment and Recreation		3	%		—			2	%

(1)	These amounts represent the properties in which we owned an indirect interest through our investment in the Core Fund and our joint venture in Brazil as of December 31, 2007. All amounts are based on our effective ownership interest in each property as of December 31, 2007.
(2)	These amounts represent all properties in which we owned an interest based on our effective ownership interest in each property as of December 31, 2007.

35

Our Directly-Owned Properties

Summarized below is certain information about the 16 office properties we owned directly as of December 31, 2007:

			Date Built/			Acquisition
City	Property	Date Acquired	Renovated(1)			Cost
						(In millions)
San Mateo, California	1900 and 2000 Alameda	June 2005		1983, 1996	(2)	$	59.8
Dallas, Texas	Citymark	August 2005		1987		$	27.8
Sacramento, California	1515 S Street	November 2005		1987		$	66.6
Miami, Florida	Airport Corporate Center	January 2006		1982-1996	(3)	$	156.8
Chicago, Illinois	321 North Clark	April 2006		1987		$	247.3
Rancho Cordova, California	3400 Data Drive	November 2006		1990		$	32.8
Emeryville, California	Watergate Tower IV	December 2006		2001		$	144.9
Redmond, Washington	Daytona Buildings	December 2006		2002		$	99.0
Redmond, Washington	Laguna Buildings	January 2007		1960-1999	(5)	$	118.0
Toronto, Ontario	Atrium on Bay	February 2007		1984		$	215.6	(4)
Seattle, Washington	Seattle Design Center	June 2007		1973, 1983	(6)	$	56.8
Seattle, Washington	5th and Bell	June 2007		2002		$	72.2
Melville, New York	3 Huntington Quadrangle	July 2007		1971		$	87.0
Los Angeles, California	One Wilshire	August 2007		1966		$	287.0
Minneapolis, Minnesota	Minneapolis Office/Flex Portfolio	September 2007		1986-1999	(7)	$	87.0
Dallas, Texas	JPMorgan Chase Tower	November 2007		1987		$	289.6

(1)	The date shown reflects the later of the building’s construction completion date or the date of the building’s most recent renovation.
(2)	1900 Alameda was constructed in 1971 and substantially renovated in 1996; 2000 Alameda was constructed in 1983.
(3)	Airport Corporate Center consists of 11 buildings constructed between 1982 and 1996 and a 5.46-acre land development site.
(4)	This amount was translated from the $250.0 million Canadian dollar acquisition cost as of the date of the acquisition.
(5)	The Laguna Buildings consists of six buildings constructed between 1960 and 1999.
(6)	Seattle Design Center consists of a two-story office building constructed in 1973 and a five-story office building with an underground garage constructed in 1983.
(7)	The Minneapolis Office/Flex Portfolio consists of nine buildings constructed between 1986 and 1999.

2007 Acquisitions

Set forth below is certain additional information about our directly-owned properties acquired during 2007.

The Laguna Buildings

The Laguna Buildings is a complex of six office buildings located in Redmond, Washington. Honeywell Industries, Inc., an industrial products company, leases 255,905 square feet, or approximately 55% of the buildings’ rentable area, under a lease that expires in 2012 and also leases 104,443 square feet, or approximately 23% of the buildings’ rentable area, under a lease that expires in 2009 and provides options to renew for two additional five-year terms. Microsoft Corporation leases 104,353 square feet, or approximately 22% of the buildings’ rentable area under a lease that expires in 2011.

36

Atrium on Bay

Atrium on Bay, a mixed-use office and retail complex located in the Downtown North submarket of the central business district of Toronto, Ontario, is comprised of three office towers, a two-story retail mall, and a two-story parking garage. The Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, a financial institution, leases 372,406 square feet, or approximately 35% of the rentable area, through leases that expire in 2011, 2013 and 2016. The balance of the complex is leased to 88 tenants none of which leases more than 10% of the rentable area of the complex.

Seattle Design Center

Seattle Design Center, a mixed-use office and retail complex located five miles south of the central business district of Seattle, Washington, is comprised of a two-story and five-story mixed-use office and retail buildings. The buildings are leased to 65 tenants, none of which leases more than 10% of the rentable area of the complex.

5th and Bell

5th and Bell is a six-story office building located in Seattle, Washington. Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V., a global electronics company, leases 120,001 square feet or approximately 61% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in June 2012 and provides an option to renew for three additional three-year periods. University of Washington, a state university, leases 27,763 square feet or approximately 14% of the building’s rentable area. Daniel J. Edelman Inc., a public relations firm, leases 20,822 square feet or approximately 11% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in August 2014 and provides an option to negotiate a renewal during the second to last year of the lease term based on then-current market rates. The remaining rentable area is leased to two office tenants and one retail tenant, none of which leases more than 10% of the building’s rentable area.

3 Huntington Quadrangle

3 Huntington Quadrangle, a two-building office complex located on Long Island in Suffolk County, New York, consists of two, four-story office buildings. Empire Blue Cross and Blue Shield, a health insurance provider, leases 109,761 square feet or approximately 27% of the rentable area of the complex, under a lease that expires in December 2010 and provides options to renew for two five-year periods. Gentiva Health Services, Inc., a provider of home health services, leases 50,627 square feet or approximately 12% of the rentable area of the complex, under a lease that expires in August 2010 and provides an option to renew for one additional five-year period. The Mortgage Warehouse, a mortgage lender, leases 42,339 square feet or approximately 10% of the building’s rentable area. The remaining lease space is leased to eight tenants, none of which leases more than 10% of the rentable area of the complex.

One Wilshire

One Wilshire, an office property in Los Angeles, California, consists of a thirty-story office building constructed in 1966 and renovated in 1992. CRG West LLC, a data center and property management company, leases 172,656 square feet or approximately 26% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in July 2017. Musick, Peeler & Garrett LLP, a national law firm, leases 106,475 square feet or approximately 16% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in October 2018 and contains options to renew for two additional five-year periods. Verizon Communications, Inc., a broadband and telecommunications company, leases 77,898 square feet or approximately 12% of the building’s rentable area, under seven leases that expire in various years through 2013. One of the leases expires in July 2012 and contains an option to renew for one additional five-year period and another lease expires in August 2013 and contains options to renew for two additional five-year periods. The remaining lease space is leased to 46 tenants, none of which leases more than 10% of the building’s rentable area.

37

Minneapolis Office/Flex Portfolio

The Minneapolis Office/Flex Portfolio is a portfolio of nine office/flex buildings located in the southwest and midway submarkets of Minneapolis, Minnesota. PreferredOne, a health benefits administrator and insurance provider, leases 87,456 square feet or approximately 11% of the rentable area of the portfolio, under a lease that expires in April 2015 and contains options to renew for two additional five-year periods. The remaining lease space is leased to 40 tenants, none of which leases more than 10% of the rentable area of the portfolio.

JPMorgan Chase Tower

JPMorgan Chase Tower is a 55-story office building located in the uptown submarket of Dallas, Texas. Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP, a law firm, leases 207,833 square feet or approximately 17% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in December 2015. JPMorgan Chase, a financial services firm, leases 195,805 square feet or approximately 16% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in September 2022. Deloitte LLP, a public accounting firm, leases 127,499 square feet or approximately 10% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in June 2012. Fulbright & Jaworski, a law firm, leases 123,509 square feet or approximately 10% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in December 2016. The remaining lease space is leased to 36 tenants, none of which leases more than 10% of the building’s rentable area.

Acquisitions Subsequent to December 31, 2007

2555 Grand

On February 29, 2008, we acquired 2555 Grand, a 24-story office building located in the Crown Center submarket of Kansas City, Missouri. 2555 Grand was constructed in 2003 and consists of 595,607 square feet of rentable area that is 100% leased to Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P, an international law firm, under a lease that expires in February 2024. The contract purchase price for 2555 Grand was $155.8 million, exclusive of transaction costs, financing fees and working capital reserves.

The Raytheon/DirecTV Buildings

On March 13, 2008, we acquired the Raytheon/DirecTV Buildings, a complex consisting of two eleven-story office buildings located in the South Bay submarket of El Segundo, California. Raytheon Company, a defense and aerospace systems supplier, leases 100% of the rentable area under a lease that expires in December 2008. DirecTV, a satellite television provider, subleases 205,202 square feet, or approximately 37% of the buildings’ rentable area, under a lease that expires in December 2008. Raytheon has executed a lease for 345,377 square feet, or approximately 63% of the buildings’ rentable area, which commences January 1, 2009, and expires on December 31, 2018. DirecTV has executed a lease for 205,202 square feet, or approximately 37% of the buildings’ rentable area, which commences January 1, 2009, and expires on December 31, 2013. The contract purchase price was $120.0 million.

Potential Acquisition Subsequent to December 31, 2007

Williams Tower

On March 18, 2008, we entered into a contract to acquire: (i) Williams Tower, a 65-story office building with an adjacent parking garage located in the Galleria/West Loop submarket of Houston, Texas; (ii) a 47.8% undivided interest in a 2.8-acre park and waterwall adjacent to Williams Tower; and (iii) a 2.3-acre land parcel located across the street from Williams Tower on Post Oak Blvd. The balance of the undivided interest in the park and waterwall is owned by an affiliate of Hines.

Williams Tower was constructed in 1982 and consists of approximately 1.5 million square feet of rentable area that is approximately 91% leased. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp, a natural gas pipe line operator, leases 250,001 square feet or approximately 16% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in March 2014 and contains options to renew for three additional five-year periods. Black Box Network Services

38

(formerly known as NextiraOne, LLC), a telecommunications infrastructure provider, leases 186,777 square feet or approximately 12% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in March 2009. The remaining rentable area is leased to 48 tenants, none of which leases more than 10% of the building’s rentable area. In addition, our headquarters is located in Williams Tower and Hines and its affiliates lease space in Williams Tower. In the aggregate, Hines and its affiliates lease 9% of the building’s net rentable area.

The contract purchase price for Williams Tower is expected to be approximately $271.5 million, exclusive of transaction costs, financing fees and working capital reserves and we expect this acquisition to close on or about May 1, 2008. There can be no assurances that this acquisition will be consummated.

Our Indirectly-Owned Properties

Our Interest in the Core Fund

The Core Fund is a partnership organized in August 2003 by Hines to invest in existing office properties in the United States that Hines believes are desirable long-term holdings. We have the right, but not the obligation, to invest up to 40% of any capital calls made by the Core Fund. In addition, we have made, and may in the future make, binding commitments to make capital contributions to the Core Fund. As of December 31, 2007 we owned an approximate 32.0% non-managing general partner interest in the Core Fund (which held ownership interests in 24 properties across the United States as of the end of 2007).

Core Fund Properties

Summarized below is certain information about the 24 office properties in which the Core Fund owned an interest as of December 31, 2007:

									Effective
			Date Built/			Acquisition			Core Fund
City	Property	Date Acquired	Renovated(1)			Cost			Ownership(2)
						(In millions)
New York, New York	425 Lexington Avenue	August 2003		1987		$	358.6			40.6	%
New York, New York	499 Park Avenue	August 2003		1981		$	153.1			40.6	%
Washington D.C.	1200 19th Street	August 2003		1987		$	69.4			40.6	%
New York, New York	600 Lexington Avenue	February 2004		1985		$	91.6			40.6	%
Houston, Texas	One Shell Plaza	May 2004		1994		$	228.7			43.0	%
Houston, Texas	Two Shell Plaza	May 2004		1992		$	123.1			43.0	%
San Francisco, California	The KPMG Building	September 2004		2002		$	148.0			85.9	%
San Francisco, California	101 Second Street	September 2004		2000		$	157.0			85.9	%
Chicago, Illinois	Three First National Plaza	March 2005		1981		$	245.3			68.7	%
San Diego, California	525 B Street	August 2005		1998		$	116.3			85.9	%
Seattle, Washington	720 Olive Way	January 2006		1981		$	83.7			68.6	%
Chicago, Illinois	333 West Wacker	April 2006		1983		$	223.0			68.6	%
Atlanta, Georgia	One Atlantic Center	July 2006		1987		$	305.0			85.9	%
Woodland Hills, California	Warner Center	October 2006		2001-2005	(3)	$	311.0			68.6	%
Richmond, Virginia	Riverfront Plaza	November 2006		1990		$	277.5			85.9	%
Roseville, California	Johnson Ranch Corporate Center	May 2007		1992, 1998	(6)		(4	)		68.6	%
Roseville, California	Roseville Corporate Center	May 2007		1999			(4	)		68.6	%
Roseville, California	Summit at Douglas Ridge	May 2007		2004, 2005	(7)		(4	)		68.6	%
Roseville, California	Olympus Corporate Center	May 2007		1992-1996	(8)		(4	)		68.6	%
Roseville, California	Douglas Corporate Center	May 2007		1990, 2003	(9)		(4	)		68.6	%
Sacramento, California	Wells Fargo Center	May 2007		1992			(4	)		68.6	%
Charlotte, North Carolina	Charlotte Plaza	June 2007		1981		$	175.5			85.9	%
Charlotte, North Carolina	The Carillon Building	July 2007		1989		$	140.0			85.9	%
Phoenix, Arizona	Renaissance Square	December 2007		1987-1989	(5)	$	270.9			85.9	%

39

(1)	The date shown reflects the later of the building’s construction completion date or the date of the building’s most recent renovation.
(2)	This percentage represents the Core Fund’s effective ownership in the properties shown. See above disclosure regarding the Company’s effective ownership through its investment in the Core Fund.
(3)	Warner Center consists of four five-story office buildings, one three-story office building and two parking structures that were constructed between 2001 and 2005.
(4)	These properties were purchased as part of a portfolio that included six properties for a purchase price of $490.2 million.
(5)	Renaissance Square consists of two office buildings constructed between 1987 and 1989.
(6)	Johnson Ranch Corporate Center consists of five two-story office buildings constructed in 1992 and 1998.
(7)	Summit at Douglas Ridge consists of two three-story office buildings constructed in 2004 and 2005.
(8)	Olympus Corporate Center consists of two three-story office buildings and two two-story office buildings constructed between 1992 and 1996.
(9)	Douglas Corporate Center consists of two three-story office buildings constructed in 1990 and 2003.

2007 Acquisitions

Set forth below is certain additional information about properties acquired by the Core Fund during 2007.

Wells Fargo Center

Wells Fargo Center is a 30-story office building located in the central business district of Sacramento. The building is leased to 42 tenants, none of which leases more than 10% of the building’s rentable area.

Johnson Ranch Corporate Center

Johnson Ranch Corporate Center consists of five two-story office buildings located in Roseville, California. Centex Corporation, a residential construction company, leases 42,790 square feet or approximately 24% of the buildings’ rentable area under a lease that expires in May 2010. The remaining lease space is leased to 34 tenants, none of which leases more than 10% of the buildings’ rentable area.

Roseville Corporate Center

Roseville Corporate Center is a three-story office building located in Roseville, California. Prudential Insurance Company, a financial services company, leases 39,162 square feet or approximately 35% of the building’s rentable area under a lease that expires in August 2010. Verizon California Inc., a wireless communication provider, leases 24,213 square feet or approximately 22% of the building’s rentable area under a lease that expires in August 2009. Umpqua Bank, a financial services company, leases 12,937 square feet or approximately 12% of the building’s rentable area under a lease that expires in June 2012. The remaining lease space is leased to five tenants, none of which leases more than 10% of the building’s rentable area.

Summit at Douglas Ridge

Summit at Douglas Ridge consists of two three-story office buildings located in Roseville, California. Beazer Homes USA, a homebuilder, leases 21,428 square feet or approximately 12% of the buildings’ rentable area under a lease that expires in July 2013. Beazer Homes USA has exercised a termination option and is expected to vacate the building in August 2008. The remaining lease space is leased to 26 tenants, none of which leases more than 10% of the buildings’ rentable area.

Olympus Corporate Center

Olympus Corporate Center consists of two three-story office buildings and two two-story office buildings located in Roseville, California. Paramount Equity Mortgage, a financial services company, leases

40

20,525 square feet or approximately 11% of the buildings’ rentable area under a lease that expires in September 2008. The remaining lease space is leased to 26 tenants, none of which leases more than 10% of the buildings’ rentable area.

Douglas Corporate Center

Douglas Corporate Center consists of two three-story office buildings located in Roseville, California. New York Life Insurance Company, a financial services company, leases 22,771 square feet or approximately 11% of the buildings’ rentable area under a lease that expires in August 2011. The remaining lease space is leased to 31 tenants, none of which leases more than 10% of the buildings’ rentable area.

Charlotte Plaza

Charlotte Plaza is a 27-story office building located at 201 South College Street in downtown Charlotte, North Carolina. Wachovia Securities, an investment banking firm, leases 308,908 square feet, or approximately 49% of the property’s rentable area, under two leases. The first lease is for 49,256 square feet and expires in April 2010. The second lease is for 259,652 square feet, expires in December 2013, contains an option to renew for an additional five-year term and contains termination rights, effective in December 2011 and December 2012, for portions of the leased space. The remaining lease space is leased to 44 tenants, none of which leases more than 10% of the building’s rentable area.

The Carillon Building

The Carillon building is a 24-story office building located at 227 West Trade Street in downtown Charlotte, North Carolina and a one-half acre parcel of land adjacent to the building. Cadwalader, Wickersham and Taft LLP, an international law firm, leases 80,303 square feet, or approximately 17% of the property’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in January 2012 and contains an option to renew for one additional five-year term. Deloitte LLP, a public accounting firm, leases 65,579 square feet, or approximately 14% of the property’s rentable area, under two leases that expire in January 2009 and June 2011. The remaining lease space is leased to 42 tenants, none of which leases more than 10% of the building’s rentable area.

Renaissance Square

Renaissance Square consists of two office buildings located in the Central Business District of Phoenix, Arizona. Quarles & Brady Streich Lang, LLP, a law firm, leases 161,300 square feet or approximately 17% of the net rentable area of Renaissance Square, under a lease that expires in April 2015 and contains options to renew for two additional five-year periods. Lewis & Roca LLP, a law firm, leases 114,328 square feet or approximately 12% of the net rentable area of Renaissance Square, under a lease that expires in February 2014 and contains options to renew for two additional five-year periods. Bryan Cave, LLP, a law firm, leases 103,353 square feet or approximately 11% of the net rentable area of Renaissance Square, through leases that expire in April 2010 and April 2017 and contain options to renew for two additional five-year periods. The remaining lease space is leased to 50 tenants, none of which leases more than 10% of the net rentable area of Renaissance Square.

Our Investment in HCB II River LLC

We have a $28.9 million investment in HCB II River LLC, a joint venture created with HCB Interest II LP (“HCB”), an affiliate of Hines on June 28, 2007. On July 2, 2007, the joint venture acquired Distribution Park Rio, an industrial property located in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The Property consists of four industrial buildings that were constructed in2001-2007. The buildings contain 693,115 square feet of rentable area that is 100% leased. We own a 50% indirect interest in Distribution Park Rio through our investment in HCB II River LLC.

41

Potential Acquisition Subsequent to December 31, 2007

One North Wacker

On February 22, 2008, the Core Fund entered into a contract to acquire 51-story office building located in the West Loop submarket of the central business district of Chicago, Illinois (“One North Wacker”). One North Wacker consists of approximately 1.4 million square feet and is approximately 98% leased. UBS, a financial institution, leases 452,049 square feet or approximately 33% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in September 2012. PriceWaterhouseCoopers, an accounting firm, leases 256,477 square feet or approximately 19% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in October 2013. Citadel, a financial institution, leases 161,488 square feet or approximately 12% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in August 2012. The contract purchase price of One North Wacker is expected to be approximately $540.0 million, exclusive of transaction costs, financing fees and working capital. There can be no assurances that this acquisition will be consummated.

Item 3.   Legal Proceedings

From time to time in the ordinary course of business, the Company or its subsidiaries may become subject to legal proceedings, claims or disputes. As of March 17, 2008, neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries was a party to any material pending legal proceedings.

Item 4.   Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

Not applicable.

42

PART II

Item 5.   Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Redemption of Equity Securities

Market Information

As of March 14, 2008, we had 170,665,671 common shares outstanding, held by a total of approximately 46,366 shareholders. The number of shareholders is based on the records of Trust Company of America, Inc., our registrar and transfer agent. There currently is no established public trading market for our common shares and we do not expect one to develop. We have a share redemption program, but it is limited in terms of the number of shares that may be redeemed annually. Our board of directors may also limit, suspend or terminate our share redemption program upon 30 days’ written notice. During 2007, we redeemed approximately 231,000 shares under this program at $9.36 per share and approximately 885,000 shares at $9.52 per share.

In order for Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) members and their associated persons to participate in the offering and sale of our common shares, we are required pursuant to National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (“NASD”) Rule 2710(f)(2)(M) to disclose in each annual report distributed to our shareholders a per share estimated value of the common shares, the method by which it was developed and the date of the data used to develop the estimated value. In addition, our Advisor has agreed to prepare annual statements of estimated share values to assist fiduciaries of retirement plans subject to the annual reporting requirements of ERISA in the preparation of their reports relating to an investment in our common shares. For these purposes, the estimated value of the shares is deemed to be $10.58 per share as of December 31, 2007. Our deemed estimated per share value is provided to assist plan fiduciaries in fulfilling their annual valuation and reporting responsibilities, and should not be used for any other purpose. We cannot assure you that this deemed estimated value, or the method used to establish such value, complies with the ERISA or IRS requirements. We are not required to obtain and did not obtain appraisals for our assets or third-party valuations or opinions for the specific purpose of determining this deemed estimated value as of December 31, 2007.

The basis for this valuation is the fact that we are currently conducting a public offering of our common shares at the price of $10.58 per share through arms-length transactions. Our offering price was determined by our board of directors in April 2007. The determination by our board of directors of the offering price used in our Current Offering was subjective and was primarily based on (i) the estimated per share net asset value of the Company as determined by our management at the time the determination was made, plus (ii) the commissions, dealer-manager fee and estimated costs associated with our Current Offering. Our management estimated the per share net asset value of the Company using appraised values of our real estate assets determined by independent third party appraisers, as well as estimates of the values of our other assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2006, and then making various adjustments and estimations in order to account for our operations and other factors that had occurred or were expected to occur between December 31, 2006 and July 1, 2007 the date at which the price change became effective. In addition, in setting our offering price, our board of directors also considered our historical and anticipated results of operations and financial condition, our current and anticipated distribution payments, yields and offering prices of other real estate companies substantially similar to us, our then current and anticipated capital and debt structure, and our management’s and Advisor’s recommendations and assessment of our prospects and expected execution of our investment and operating strategies. We have not updated this analysis for purposes of the December 31, 2007 deemed estimated value presented above.

Our valuation is an estimate only. Both our real estate appraisals and the methodology utilized by our management in estimating our per share net asset value were subject to various limitations and were based on a number of assumptions and estimates which may or may not be accurate or complete. No liquidity discounts or discounts relating to the fact that we are currently externally managed were applied to our estimated per share valuation, and no attempt was made to value Hines REIT as an enterprise. Likewise, the valuation was not reduced by potential selling commissions or other costs of sale, which would impact proceeds in the case of a liquidation.

43

The redemption price we offer in our share redemption program is $9.52 per share on the date of this report and therefore $10.58 per share does not reflect the amount a shareholder would currently receive under our share redemption program. Likewise, the offering price of our shares may not be indicative of the price our shareholders would receive if they sold our shares outside of our share redemption program, if our shares were actively traded or if we were liquidated. Because the estimated per share net asset value of the Company was increased by certain fees and costs associated with the Current Offering, the proceeds received from a liquidation of our assets would likely be substantially less than the Current Offering price of our shares. As a result, we expect that, in the absence of other factors affecting the value of our properties, our aggregate net asset value would be less than the aggregate proceeds of our offerings and the offering price may not be the best indicator of the value of shares purchased as a long term income producing investment. Because there is no public market for our shares, any sale of our shares would likely be at a substantial discount. Please see “Item 1A. Risk Factors — Investment Risks — There is currently no public market for our common shares, and we do not intend to list the shares on a stock exchange. Therefore, it will likely be difficult for shareholders to sell their shares and, if they are able to sell their shares, they will likely sell them at a substantial discount.”

Distributions

In order to meet the requirements for being treated as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, we must pay distributions to our shareholders each taxable year in an amount equal to at least 90% of our net ordinary taxable income (capital gains are not required to be distributed). Historically, we have declared distributions to shareholders as of daily record dates and aggregated and paid such distributions quarterly. For the period from January 2006 through June, 2006, with the authority of our board of directors, we declared distributions equal to $0.00164384 per share, per day. For the period from July 2006 through December, 2007, we declared distributions equal to $0.00170959 per share, per day. Additionally, we have declared distributions equal to $0.00170959 per share, per day for the period from January 1, 2008 through April 30, 2008.

Our board of directors began authorizing us to declare distributions in November 2004, after we commenced business operations. We have declared distributions monthly and aggregated and paid such distributions quarterly. We intend to continue this distribution policy for so long as our board of directors decides this policy is in the best interests of our shareholders. We have made the following quarterly distributions to our shareholders and minority interests for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006:

		Total
Distribution for the Quarter Ended	Date Paid	Distribution
		(In thousands)
2007
December 31, 2007	January 16, 2008	$	24,923
September 30, 2007	October 15, 2007	$	23,059
June 30, 2007	July 20, 2007	$	18,418
March 31, 2007	April 16, 2007	$	14,012
2006
December 31, 2006	January 16, 2007	$	11,281
September 30, 2006	October 13, 2006	$	9,056
June 30, 2006	July 14, 2006	$	6,405
March 31, 2006	April 13, 2006	$	4,212

Distributions to shareholders are characterized for federal income tax purposes as ordinary income, capital gains, non-taxable return of capital or a combination of the three. Distributions that exceed our current and accumulated earnings and profits (calculated for tax purposes) constitute a return of capital for tax purposes rather than a distribution and reduce the shareholders’ basis in our common shares. To the extent that a distribution exceeds both current and accumulated earnings and profits and the shareholders’ basis in the common shares, it will generally be treated as a capital gain. The Company annually notifies shareholders of the taxability of distributions paid during the preceding year.

44

For the year ended December 31, 2006, approximately 23% of the distributions paid were taxable to the investor as ordinary taxable income and approximately 77% were treated as return of capital for federal income tax purposes. For the year ended December 31, 2007, approximately 46% of the distributions paid were taxable to the investor as ordinary taxable income and approximately 54% were treated as return of capital for federal income tax purposes. The amount of distributions paid and taxable portion in this period are not indicative or predictive of amounts anticipated in future periods. Please see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources — Cash Flows from Financing Activities — Distributions” in this report.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

Under the terms of our Employee and Director Incentive Share Plan, on July 9, 2007, 1,000 restricted common shares were granted to each of our independent directors, Messrs. George A. Davis, Thomas A. Hassard and Stanley D. Levy. Such shares were granted without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, in reliance upon the exemption from registration contained in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.

Shares Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table sets forth the number of shares of our common stock reserved for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2007:

					Number of Securities
	Number of Securities				Remaining Available for
	to be Issued Upon		Weighted-Average		Future Issuance Under
	Exercise of Outstanding		Exercise Price of		Equity Compensation Plans
	Options, Warrants and		Outstanding Options,		(Excluding Securities
	Rights		Warrants and Rights		Reflected in Column (a))
Plan Category	(a)		(b)		(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders		—		n/a		7,970,460
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders		—		n/a		—
Total		—		n/a		7,970,460

Share Redemption Program

For so long as our shares are not listed on a national securities exchange or included for quotation on a national securities market, we expect to offer a share redemption program to our shareholders. Our board of directors may terminate, suspend or amend our share redemption program at any time upon 30 days’ written notice. To the extent our board determines that we have sufficient cash available for redemptions, we may redeem shares presented for cash, provided that the number of shares we may redeem under the program during any calendar year may not exceed, as of the date we commit to any redemption, 10% of our shares outstanding as of the same date in the prior calendar year. Generally, shareholders must hold their shares for at least one year before they may participate in our share redemption program; however, in the event of the death or disability of a shareholder, we may waive the one-year holding period requirement as well as the annual limitation on the number of shares that will be redeemed.

The current redemption price for our shares, which is subject to adjustment by our board of directors at any time on 30 days’ notice, is $9.52 per share.

45

Issuer Redemptions of Equity Securities

The following table lists shares we redeemed under our share redemption plan during the period covered by this report.

					Total Number of		Maximum Number of
	Total				Shares Purchased as		Shares that
	Number of				Part of Publicly		May Yet be Redeemed
	Shares		Average Price		Announced Plans or		Under the Plans or
Period	Redeemed		Paid per Share		Programs		Programs(1)
January 1, 2007 to March 31, 2007		108,831	$	9.36		108,831		2,890,147
April 1, 2007 to June 30, 2007		121,997		9.36		121,997		4,993,045
July 1, 2007 to September 30, 2007		252,984		9.52		252,984		5,471,784
October 1, 2007 to October 31, 2007		631,855		9.52		631,855		4,839,929
November 1, 2007 to November 30, 2007		—		—		—		4,839,929
December 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007		—		—		—		6,906,080
Total		1,115,667				1,115,667

(1) We may redeem shares under the program so long as the total number of shares redeemed during the calendar year does not exceed, as of the date of the redemption, 10% of our shares outstanding on the same date during the prior year. Our share redemption plan has been in effect since June 2004 and has no definitive expiration date. However, the plan may be suspended or terminated at the discretion of the board of directors.

46

Item 6.   Selected Financial Data

The following selected consolidated and combined financial data are qualified by reference to and should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto and “Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” below.

	2007			2006			2005			2004
	(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Operating Data:
Revenues	$	179,576		$	63,930		$	6,247		$	—
Depreciation and amortization	$	68,151		$	22,478		$	3,331		$	—
Asset management and acquisition fees	$	29,939		$	17,559		$	5,225		$	818
Organizational and offering expenses, net of reversal(1)	$	7,583		$	5,760		$	(6,630	)	$	14,771
General and administrative expenses, net(2)	$	4,570		$	2,819		$	494		$	618
Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated entities	$	(8,288	)	$	(3,291	)	$	(831	)	$	68
Loss before income taxes and (income) loss allocated to minority interests	$	(85,306	)	$	(38,919	)	$	(2,392	)	$	(16,549	)
Provision for income taxes	$	(1,068	)	$	—		$	—		$	—
(Income) Loss allocated to minority interests	$	(1,266	)	$	429		$	635		$	6,541
Net loss	$	(87,640	)	$	(38,490	)	$	(1,757	)	$	(10,008	)
Basic and diluted loss per common share	$	(0.70	)	$	(0.79	)	$	(0.16	)	$	(60.40	)
Distributions authorized per common share(3)	$	0.62		$	0.61		$	0.60		$	0.06
Weighted average common shares outstanding — basic and diluted		125,776			48,468			11,061			166
Balance Sheet Data:
Total investment property	$	2,051,890		$	798,329		$	143,577		$	—
Investment in unconsolidated entities	$	361,157		$	307,553		$	118,575		$	28,182
Total assets	$	2,703,623		$	1,213,662		$	297,334		$	30,112
Long-term obligations	$	1,273,596		$	498,989		$	77,922		$	409

(1)	Based on actual gross proceeds raised in the initial offering, we were not obligated to reimburse the Advisor for certain organizational and offering costs that were previously accrued by us. Accruals of these costs were reversed in our financial statements during the year ended December 31, 2005. See further discussion in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included in this report.
(2)	During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Advisor forgave amounts previously advanced to us for certain corporate-level general and administrative expenses. See further discussion in Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in this report.
(3)	The Company paid its first distributions in January 2005.

47

Item 7.   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation

You should read the following discussion and analysis together with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in this Annual Report onForm 10-K. The following information contains forward-looking statements, which are subject to risks and uncertainties. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Please see “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” above for a description of these risks and uncertainties.

Executive Summary

Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (“Hines REIT” and, together with its consolidated subsidiaries, “we”, “us” or the “Company”) and its subsidiary, Hines REIT Properties, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”) were formed in August 2003 for the purpose of investing in and owning interests in real estate. We have invested and continue to invest in real estate to satisfy our primary investment objectives, including preserving invested capital, paying regular cash distributions and achieving modest capital appreciation of our assets over the long term. We make investments directly through entities wholly owned by the Operating Partnership, or indirectly through other entities, such as through our investment in Hines U.S. Core Office Fund, L.P. (the “Core Fund”). As of December 31, 2007, we had direct and indirect interests in 39 office properties located throughout the United States, one mixed-use office and retail property in Toronto, Ontario, and one industrial property in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. In addition, we have and may make other real estate investments including, but not limited to, properties outside of the United States, non-office properties, loans and ground leases. Our principal targeted assets are office properties that have quality construction, desirable locations and quality tenants. We intend to invest in properties which will be diversified by location, lease expirations and tenant industries.

In order to provide equity capital for these investments, we sold shares to the public through our initial public offering (the “Initial Offering”), which commenced on June 18, 2004 and terminated on June 18, 2006, and we continue to sell common shares through our follow-on public offering of a maximum of $2.2 billion in common shares (the “Current Offering”). We commenced the Current Offering on June 19, 2006 and we intend to continue raising significant amounts of capital through our Current Offering and potential follow-on offerings.

48

The following table provides summary information regarding the properties in which we owned interests as of December 31, 2007:

Direct Investments

		Leasable			Percent			Our Effective
Property	City	Square Feet			Leased			Ownership(1)
321 North Clark	Chicago, Illinois		885,664			99	%		100	%
Citymark	Dallas, Texas		220,079			100	%		100	%
JPMorgan Chase Tower	Dallas, Texas		1,242,590			91	%		100	%
Watergate Tower IV	Emeryville, California		344,433			100	%		100	%
One Wilshire	Los Angeles, California		661,553			99	%		100	%
3 Huntington Quadrangle	Melville, New York		407,731			87	%		100	%
Airport Corporate Center	Miami, Florida		1,021,397			90	%		100	%
Minneapolis Office/Flex Portfolio	Minneapolis, Minnesota		766,240			85	%		100	%
3400 Data Drive	Rancho Cordova, California		149,703			100	%		100	%
Daytona Buildings	Redmond, Washington		251,313			93	%		100	%
Laguna Buildings	Redmond, Washington		464,701			100	%		100	%
1515 S Street	Sacramento, California		348,881			100	%		100	%
1900 and 2000 Alameda	San Mateo, California		253,377			96	%		100	%
Seattle Design Center	Seattle, Washington		390,684			84	%		100	%
5th and Bell	Seattle, Washington		197,135			98	%		100	%
Atrium on Bay	Toronto, Ontario		1,070,287			95	%		100	%
Total for Directly-Owned Properties			8,675,768			94	%
Indirect Investments
Core Fund Investment
One Atlantic Center	Atlanta, Georgia		1,100,312			84	%		27.47	%
The Carillon Building	Charlotte, North Carolina		470,726			100	%		27.47	%
Charlotte Plaza	Charlotte, North Carolina		625,026			97	%		27.47	%
Three First National Plaza	Chicago, Illinois		1,419,978			94	%		21.97	%
333 West Wacker	Chicago, Illinois		845,194			87	%		21.92	%
One Shell Plaza	Houston, Texas		1,228,160			98	%		13.73	%
Two Shell Plaza	Houston, Texas		566,982			95	%		13.73	%
425 Lexington Avenue	New York, New York		700,034			100	%		12.98	%
499 Park Avenue	New York, New York		288,722			100	%		12.98	%
600 Lexington Avenue	New York, New York		283,311			95	%		12.98	%
Renaissance Square	Phoenix, Arizona		965,508			95	%		27.47	%
Riverfront Plaza	Richmond, Virginia		949,791			100	%		27.47	%
Johnson Ranch Corporate Center	Roseville, California		179,990			76	%		21.92	%
Roseville Corporate Center	Roseville, California		111,418			94	%		21.92	%
Summit at Douglas Ridge	Roseville, California		185,128			85	%		21.92	%
Olympus Corporate Center	Roseville, California		191,494			59	%		21.92	%
Douglas Corporate Center	Roseville, California		214,606			85	%		21.92	%
Wells Fargo Center	Sacramento, California		502,365			93	%		21.92	%
525 B Street	San Diego, California		447,159			90	%		27.47	%
The KPMG Building	San Francisco, California		379,328			100	%		27.47	%
101 Second Street	San Francisco, California		388,370			100	%		27.47	%
720 Olive Way	Seattle, Washington		300,710			93	%		21.92	%
1200 19th Street	Washington, D.C.		328,154	(2)		28	%		12.98	%
Warner Center	Woodland Hills, California		808,274			97	%		21.92	%
Total for Core Fund Properties			13,480,740			92	%
Other
Distribution Park Rio	Rio de Janeiro, Brazil		693,115			100	%		50	%
Total for All Properties			22,849,623			93	%

(1) This percentage shows the effective ownership of the Operating Partnership in the properties listed. On December 31, 2007, Hines REIT owned a 97.6% interest in the Operating Partnership as its sole general partner. Affiliates of Hines owned the remaining 2.4% interest in the Operating Partnership. Our interest in Distribution Park Rio is owned through our investment in a joint venture with a Hines affiliate. We own interests in all of the properties other than those identified above as being owned 100% by us and

49

Distribution Park Rio through our interest in the Core Fund, in which we owned an approximate 32.0% non-managing general partner interest as of December 31, 2007. The Core Fund does not own 100% of these buildings; its ownership interest in its buildings ranges from 40.6% to 85.9%.

(2) This square footage amount includes three floors which are being added to the building and are currently under construction. The construction is expected to be completed in 2009.

As of December 31, 2007, we had primarily invested in institutional-quality office properties in the United States. We expect to continue to focus primarily on investments in institutional-quality office properties located in the United States (whether as direct investments or as indirect investments through the Core Fund or otherwise). However, we have expanded our focus to include other real estate investments such as our investment in Toronto, Ontario and our international joint venture investment in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. We intend to continue to pursue institutional-quality office properties as well as other real estate investments that we believe will satisfy our long-term primary objectives of preserving invested capital and achieving modest capital appreciation over the long term, in addition to providing regular cash distributions to our shareholders. In the future, our investments may include additional investments outside of the United States, investments in non-office properties, non-core or development investments, loans, ground leases and investments in other joint ventures.

Economic Update

The global and national economies softened in 2007, and seem to have continued to deteriorate in early 2008. It is still unclear as to whether the economy has entered a significant slow down or a recession, however, there are a number of troublesome signs in the economy and the capital markets, including increasing default rates on residential mortgages; declining housing prices; higher energy prices; slowing employment growth; weakening US Dollar; and softening consumer spending. In addition, the debt capital markets have been in a state of turmoil, largely precipitated by escalating defaults in residential sub-prime mortgages. This turmoil has extended from the residential mortgage markets and has caused dislocation in the general corporate and commercial real estate debt markets. As a result, debt capital is constrained, more expensive, and available on less favorable terms to borrowers than it has been in recent years. With less capital available for investment in commercial real estate, there is evidence of fewer buyers who are seeking to acquire commercial properties resulting in possible increases in cap rates and lower prices or values.

Office market fundamentals are also beginning to show signs of softening. The current state of the economy and the implications of future potential weakening could negatively impact office market fundamentals and result in lower occupancy of office space, lower rental rates, and declining values in our current portfolio. Due to our investment strategy of investing in high-quality real estate in fundamentally sound long-term markets with long-term leases to credit worthy tenants, we believe we are well positioned to withstand a down cycle, however we may experience a decrease in the value of our assets and a decrease in our distribution rate due to reduced operating cash flow if our assets suffer additional vacancy or lower rental rates from a softening office market. In addition, with the potential of unfavorable pricing available to sellers and less capital available in the debt markets, there may be fewer acquisition opportunities available in the market until the capital markets stabilize and the economy strengthens. Notwithstanding the above, if commercial real estate prices decline and cap rates increase, any new investments we make may generate higher returns than were available in the past two or three years.

Critical Accounting Policies

Each of our critical accounting policies involves the use of estimates that require management to make judgments that are subjective in nature. Management relies on its experience, collects historical and current market data, and analyzes these assumptions in order to arrive at what it believes to be reasonable estimates. Under different conditions or assumptions, materially different amounts could be reported related to the accounting policies described below. In addition, application of these accounting policies involves the exercise of judgments on the use of assumptions as to future uncertainties and, as a result, actual results could materially differ from these estimates.

50

Basis of Presentation

Our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report include the accounts of Hines REIT and the Operating Partnership (over which Hines REIT exercises financial and operating control) and the Operating Partnership’s wholly-owned subsidiaries as well as the related amounts of minority interest. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

We evaluate the need to consolidate investments based on standards set forth in Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 46R,Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities and American Institute of Certified Public Accountants’ Statement of Position78-9, Accounting for Investments in Real Estate Ventures, as amended by Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”)No. 04-5,Investor’s Accounting for an Investment in a Limited Partnership When the Investor Is the Sole General Partner and the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights.In accordance with this accounting literature, we will consolidate joint ventures that are determined to be variable interest entities for which we are the primary beneficiary. We will also consolidate joint ventures that are not determined to be variable interest entities, but for which we exercise significant control over major operating decisions, such as approval of budgets, selection of property managers, asset management, investment activity and changes in financing.

Investment Property

Real estate assets we own directly are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation, which in the opinion of management, does not exceed the individual property’s fair value. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method. The estimated useful lives for computing depreciation are generally 10 years for furniture and fixtures,15-20 years for electrical and mechanical installations and 40 years for buildings. Major replacements that extend the useful life of the assets are capitalized. Maintenance and repair costs are expensed as incurred.

Real estate assets are reviewed for impairment if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the individual property may not be recoverable. In such an event, a comparison will be made of the current and projected operating cash flows of each property on an undiscounted basis to the carrying amount of such property. Such carrying amount would be adjusted, if necessary, to estimated fair values to reflect impairment in the value of the asset. At December 31, 2007, management believes no such impairment has occurred.

Acquisitions of properties are accounted for utilizing the purchase method and, accordingly, the results of operations of acquired properties are included in our results of operations from their respective dates of acquisition. Estimates of future cash flows and other valuation techniques that we believe are similar to those used by independent appraisers are used to allocate the purchase price of acquired property between land, buildings and improvements, equipment and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities such as amounts related to in-place leases, acquired above- and below-market leases, tenant relationships, asset retirement obligations and mortgage notes payable. Initial valuations are subject to change until such information is finalized no later than 12 months from the acquisition date.

The estimated fair value of acquired in-place leases are the costs we would have incurred to lease the properties to the occupancy level of the properties at the date of acquisition. Such estimates include the fair value of leasing commissions, legal costs and other direct costs that would be incurred to lease the properties to such occupancy levels. Additionally, we evaluate the time period over which such occupancy levels would be achieved and include an estimate of the net market-based rental revenues and net operating costs (primarily consisting of real estate taxes, insurance and utilities) that would be incurred during thelease-up period. Acquired in-place leases as of the date of acquisition are amortized over the remaining lease terms.

Acquired above-and below-market lease values are recorded based on the present value (using an interest rate that reflects the risks associated with the lease acquired) of the difference between the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and management’s estimate of fair market value lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining terms of the leases. The capitalized above- and below-market lease values are amortized as adjustments to rental revenue over the

51

remaining terms of the respective leases. Should a tenant terminate its lease, the unamortized portion of the in-place lease value is charged to amortization expense and the unamortized portion of out-of-market lease value is charged to rental revenue.

Acquired above- and below-market ground lease values are recorded based on the difference between the present values (using an interest rate that reflects the risks associated with the lease acquired) of the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the ground leases and management’s estimate of fair market value of land under the ground leases. The capitalized above- and below-market lease values are amortized as adjustments to ground lease expense over the lease term.

Management estimates the fair value of assumed mortgage notes payable based upon indications of current market pricing for similar types of debt with similar maturities. Assumed mortgage notes payable are initially recorded at their estimated fair value as of the assumption date, and the difference between such estimated fair value and the note’s outstanding principal balance is amortized to interest expense over the life of the mortgage note payable.

Deferred Leasing Costs

Direct leasing costs, primarily consisting of third-party leasing commissions and tenant incentives, are capitalized and amortized over the life of the related lease. Tenant incentive amortization is recorded as an offset to rental revenue and the amortization of other direct leasing costs is recorded in amortization expense.

The Company commences revenue recognition on its leases based on a number of factors. In most cases, revenue recognition under a lease begins when the lessee takes possession of or controls the physical use of the leased asset. Generally, this occurs on the lease commencement date. The determination of who is the owner, for accounting purposes, of the tenant improvements determines the nature of the leased asset and when revenue recognition under a lease begins. If the Company is the owner, for accounting purposes, of the tenant improvements, then the leased asset is the finished space and revenue recognition begins when the lessee takes possession of the finished space, typically when the improvements are substantially complete. If the Company concludes it is not the owner, for accounting purposes, of the tenant improvements (the lessee is the owner), then the leased asset is the unimproved space and any tenant improvement allowances funded under the lease are treated as lease incentives which reduces revenue recognized over the term of the lease. In these circumstances, the Company begins revenue recognition when the lessee takes possession of the unimproved space for the lessee to construct their own improvements. The Company considers a number of different factors to evaluate whether it or the lessee is the owner of the tenant improvements for accounting purposes. These factors include, among others: 1) whether the lease stipulates how and on what a tenant improvement allowance may be spent; 2) whether the tenant or landlord retains legal title to the improvements; 3) the uniqueness of the improvements; 4) the expected economic life of the tenant improvements relative to the length of the lease; and 5) who constructs or directs the construction of the improvements.

The determination of who owns the tenant improvements, for accounting purposes, is subject to significant judgment. In making that determination, the Company considers all of the above factors, among others. No one factor, however, necessarily establishes our determination.

Organizational and Offering Costs

Certain organizational and offering costs related to our public offerings have been paid by our Advisor on our behalf. Organizational and offering costs incurred by our Advisor have been analyzed and segregated between those which are organizational in nature, those which are offering-related salaries and other general and administrative expenses of the Advisor and its affiliates, and those which qualify as offering expenses in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) Topic 5.A,Miscellaneous Accounting — Expenses of Offering.Organizational costs are expensed as incurred in accordance with Statement of Position98-5,Reporting on the Costs ofStart-up Activities. Offering-related salaries and other general and administrative expenses of the Advisor and its affiliates are expensed as incurred, and third party offering expenses are taken as a reduction against the net proceeds of the offerings within additional paid-in capital in accordance with SAB Topic 5.A. In addition to the offering costs to be paid to the Advisor, selling commissions and dealer

52

manager fees are paid to our Hines Real Estate Securities, Inc. (the “Dealer Manager”). Such costs are netted against the net offering proceeds within additional paid-in capital as well.

Pursuant to an advisory agreement we entered into with the Advisor during the Initial Offering, we were obligated to reimburse the Advisor in an amount equal to the lesser of actual organizational and offering costs incurred or 3.0% of the gross proceeds raised from the Initial Offering. This agreement expired on June 18, 2006. Organizational and offering costs recorded in our financial statements in periods ending on or before June 30, 2006 were based on estimates of gross proceeds to be raised through the end of the Initial Offering. Such estimates were based on highly subjective factors, including the number of retail broker-dealers signing selling agreements with our Dealer Manager, anticipated market share penetration in the retail broker-dealer network and the Dealer Manager’s best estimate of the growth rate in sales. At each balance sheet date, management reviewed the actual gross offering proceeds raised to date and management’s estimate of future sales of our common shares through the end of the Initial Offering to determine how much of these costs were expected to be reimbursed to the Advisor, then adjusted the accruals of such costs accordingly.

We commenced the Current Offering on June 19, 2006, and on June 26, 2006, we entered into a new advisory agreement with the Advisor (the “Advisory Agreement”). The Advisory Agreement was renewed in June 2007 for an additional one-year term. Certain organizational and offering costs associated with the Current Offering have been paid by the Advisor on our behalf. Pursuant to the terms of our current Advisory Agreement, we are obligated to reimburse the Advisor for the actual organizational and offering costs incurred, so long as such costs, together with selling commissions and dealer-manger fees, do not exceed 15% of gross proceeds from the Current Offering. These costs were recorded in the accompanying consolidated financial statements in the period in which they were incurred.

Our Current Offering will terminate on June 19, 2008, pursuant to the terms of the offering. Accordingly, we expect to commence a follow-on offering on or about June 20, 2008 (the “Third Offering”). Pursuant to the anticipated terms of the Third Offering, we are not expected to be obligated to reimburse the Advisor for organizational and offering costs related to the Third Offering. Additionally, the Advisor is not a shareholder of Hines REIT. Accordingly, no amounts of organizational and offering costs incurred by the Advisor in connection with the Third Offering during the year ended December 31, 2007 have been recorded in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition and Valuation of Receivables

We are required to recognize minimum rent revenues on a straight-line basis over the terms of tenant leases, including rent holidays, if any. Revenues associated with tenant reimbursements are recognized in the period in which the expenses are incurred based upon the tenant’s lease provision. Revenues relating to lease termination fees are recognized at the time that the tenant’s right to occupy the space is terminated and when we have satisfied all obligations under the lease and are included in other revenue in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. To the extent our leases provide for rental increases at specified intervals, we will record a receivable for rent not yet due under the lease terms. Accordingly, our management must determine, in its judgment, to what extent the unbilled rent receivable applicable to each specific tenant is collectible. We review unbilled rent receivables on a quarterly basis and take into consideration the tenant’s payment history, the financial condition of the tenant, business conditions in the industry in which the tenant operates and economic conditions in the area in which the property is located. In the event that the collectability of unbilled rent with respect to any given tenant is in doubt, we would be required to record an increase in our allowance for doubtful accounts or record a direct write-off of the specific rent receivable, which would have an adverse effect on our net income for the year in which the reserve is increased or the direct writeoff is recorded and would decrease our total assets and shareholders’ equity.

Derivative Instruments

We have entered into interest rate swap transactions as economic hedges against the variability of future interest rates on certain variable interest rate debt. To date, we have not designated any such contracts as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes. The interest rate swaps have been recorded at their estimated fair value

53

in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2007 and 2006. Changes in the fair value of the interest rate swaps have been recorded in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations for the years then ended.

We mark the interest rate swaps to their estimated fair value as of each balance sheet date, and the changes in fair value are reflected in our consolidated statements of operations.

In February 2007, we entered into a foreign currency contract related to the acquisition of an office property located in Toronto, Ontario. The contract was entered into as an economic hedge against the variability of the foreign currency exchange rate related to our equity investment and was settled at the close of this acquisition. The gain that resulted upon settlement was recorded in loss on derivative instruments, net, in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Treatment of Management Compensation, Expense Reimbursements and Operating Partnership Participation Interest

We outsource management of our operations to the Advisor and certain other affiliates of Hines. Fees related to these services are accounted for based on the nature of the service and the relevant accounting literature. Fees for services performed that represent period costs of the Company are expensed as incurred. Such fees include acquisition fees and asset management fees paid to the Advisor and property management fees paid to Hines. In addition to cash payments for acquisition fees and asset management fees paid to the Advisor, an affiliate of the Advisor has received a participation interest, which represents a profits interest in the Operating Partnership related to these services. As the percentage interest of the participation interest is adjusted, the value attributable to such adjustment is charged against earnings, and the participation interest will be recorded as a liability until it is repurchased for cash or converted into common shares of the Company. The conversion and redemption features of the participation interest are accounted for in accordance with the guidance in EITFNo. 95-7,Implementation Issues Related to the Treatment of Minority Interests in Certain Real Estate Investment Trusts.

Redemptions of the participation interest for cash will be accounted for as a reduction to the liability discussed above to the extent of such liability, with any additional amounts recorded as a reduction to equity. Conversions into common shares of the Company will be recorded as an increase to the outstanding common shares and additional paid-in capital accounts and a corresponding reduction in the liability discussed above. Redemptions and conversions of the participation interest will result in a corresponding reduction in the percentage attributable to the participation interest and will have no impact on the calculation of subsequent increases in the participation interest.

Hines may perform construction management services for us for both re-development activities and tenant construction. These fees are considered incremental to the construction effort and will be capitalized to the applicable real estate project as incurred in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 67,Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Projects.Costs related to tenant construction will be depreciated over the estimated useful life of the related real estate improvements. Costs related to redevelopment activities will be depreciated over the estimated useful life of the associated project. Leasing activities are generally performed by Hines on our behalf. Leasing fees are capitalized and amortized over the life of the related lease in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 91,Accounting for Nonrefundable Fees and Costs Associated with Originating or Acquiring Loans and Initial Direct Costs of Leases.

Income Taxes

We elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code in conjunction with the filing of our 2004 federal tax return. In addition, we hold an investment in the Core Fund, which has invested in properties through a structure that includes entities that have elected to be taxed as REITs. In order to qualify as a REIT, an entity must meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute at least 90% of its annual ordinary taxable income to shareholders. REITs are generally not subject to federal income tax on taxable income that they distribute to

54

their shareholders. It is our intention to adhere to these requirements and maintain our REIT status, as well as to ensure that the applicable entities in the Core Fund structure also maintain their REIT status. As such, no provision for U.S. federal income taxes has been included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. As a REIT and indirectly through our investment in the Core Fund, we still may be subject to certain state, local and foreign taxes on our income and property and to federal income and excise taxes on our undistributed taxable income. In addition, we are and will indirectly be required to pay federal and state income tax on the net taxable income, if any, from the activities conducted through the taxable REIT subsidiary of the Core Fund.

During 2006, the State of Texas enacted new tax legislation that restructured the state business tax in Texas by replacing the taxable capital and earned surplus components of the then-current franchise tax with a new “margin tax,” which for financial reporting purposes is considered an income tax under SFAS 109,Accounting for Income Taxes.This legislation had an immaterial impact on our financial statements.

Due to the acquisition of Atrium on Bay, an office property located in Toronto, Ontario, we have recorded a provision for Canadian income taxes of $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 in accordance with Canadian tax laws and regulations.

In July 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the recognition and measurement of a tax position taken in a tax return. FIN 48 requires that a determination be made as to whether it is more likely than not that a tax position taken, based on the technical merits, will be sustained upon examination. If the more likely than not threshold is met, the related tax position must be measured to determine the amount of provision or benefit, if any, to recognize in the financial statements. We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various states, Canada and Brazil. Tax years 2004 through 2006 remain subject to potential examination by certain federal and state taxing authorities. No income tax examinations are currently in process. We have reviewed our current tax positions and believe our positions will be sustained on examination. The adoption of the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007 did not have a material impact on our financial statements. We classify interest and penalties related to underpayment of income taxes as income tax expense.

As of December 31, 2007, we had no significant temporary differences, tax credits, or net operating loss carry-forwards.

Comprehensive Loss

We report comprehensive loss in our consolidated statements of shareholders’ equity. Comprehensive loss was $75.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 resulting from our net loss and our foreign currency translation adjustment. See “International Operations” below for additional information.

International Operations

The Canadian dollar is the functional currency for our subsidiaries operating in Toronto, Ontario and the Brazilian real is the functional currency for our subsidiary operating in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Our foreign subsidiaries have translated their financial statements into U.S. dollars for reporting purposes. Assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate in effect as of the balance sheet date. We translate income statement accounts using the average exchange rate for the period and significant nonrecurring transactions using the rate on the transaction date. These gains or losses are included in accumulated other comprehensive income as a separate component of shareholders’ equity.

Our international subsidiaries may have transactions denominated in currencies other than their functional currency. In these instances, assets and liabilities are remeasured into the functional currency at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the period, and income statement accounts are remeasured at the average exchange rate for the period. These gains or losses are included in our results of operations.

Our subsidiaries also record gains or losses in the income statement when a transaction with a third party, denominated in a currency other than the entity’s functional currency, is settled and the functional currency

55

cash flows realized are more or less than expected based upon the exchange rate in effect when the transaction was initiated.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157,Fair Value Measurements(“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in U.S. GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The statement does not require new fair value measurements, but is applied to the extent other accounting pronouncements require or permit fair value measurements. The statement emphasizes fair value as a market-based measurement which should be determined based on assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. We will be required to disclose the methodology used to determine fair value, the extent to which fair value is used to measure assets and liabilities, the inputs used to develop the measurements, and the effect of certain of the measurements on earnings (or changes in net assets) for the period. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. In February 2008, the FASB deferred the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all nonfinancial assets and liabilities except for those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. We have adopted this standard effective January 1, 2008 and do not expect to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159,The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities(“SFAS No. 159”). SFAS No. 159 expands opportunities to use fair value measurement in financial reporting and permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. This Statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We have adopted this standard effective January 1, 2008 and have elected not to measure any of our current eligible financial assets or liabilities at fair value upon adoption; however, we may elect to measure future eligible financial assets or liabilities at fair value.

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141 (Revised 2007),Business Combinations(“SFAS No. 141R”). SFAS No. 141R will significantly change the accounting for business combinations. Under SFAS No. 141R, an acquiring entity will be required to recognize all the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition-date fair value with limited exceptions. SFAS No. 141R will also change the accounting treatment for certain specific acquisition-related items including: (1) expensing acquisition related costs as incurred; (2) valuing noncontrolling interests at fair value at the acquisition date; and (3) expensing restructuring costs associated with an acquired business. SFAS No. 141R also includes a substantial number of new disclosure requirements. SFAS No. 141R is to be applied prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after January 1, 2009. We expect SFAS No. 141R could have a material impact if it is determined that real estate acquisitions fall under the definition of business combinations.

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 160,Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements(“SFAS No. 160”). SFAS No. 160 establishes requirements for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the company (sometimes called “minority interests”) be clearly identified, presented, and disclosed in the consolidated statement of financial position within equity, but separate from the parent’s equity. All changes in the parent’s ownership interests are required to be accounted for consistently as equity transactions and any noncontrolling equity investments in deconsolidated subsidiaries must be measured initially at fair value. SFAS No. 160 is effective, on a prospective basis, for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. However, presentation and disclosure requirements must be retrospectively applied to comparative financial statements. We are currently assessing the impact of SFAS No. 160 on our consolidated statement of operations.

Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

General

Since our formation, our principal cash requirements have been for property acquisitions, property-level operating expenses, management fees, capital improvements, debt service, organizational and offering

56

expenses, corporate-level general and administrative expenses and distributions. We have had four primary sources of capital for meeting our cash requirements:

•  proceeds from our public offerings, including our dividend reinvestment plan;

•  debt financings, including secured or unsecured facilities;

•  cash flow generated by our real estate investments and operations; and

•  advances from affiliates.

For the year ended December 31, 2007, our cash needs for acquisitions have been met primarily by proceeds from our public equity offerings and debt financing. Operating cash needs have been met through cash flow generated by our properties and investments, as well as advances from affiliates. We believe that our current capital resources and cash flow from operations are sufficient to meet our liquidity needs for the foreseeable future.

We raised significant funds from our Current Offering during 2007, and we expect to continue to raise significant funds from our Current Offering and potential future follow-on offerings. We intend to continue making real estate investments with these funds and funds available to us under our credit facilities and other permanent debt. We also intend to continue to pay distributions to our shareholders on a quarterly basis. As noted above, debt capital has recently become more expensive and less available as a result of escalating defaults in residential sub-prime mortgages and the current state of the economy, and future potential weakening of the economy could negatively impact office fundamentals, potentially resulting in lower occupancy, rental rates and values of our assets. Given those challenges, acquisitions in such an environment may put downward pressure on our distribution payments as a result of potentially lower yields on new investments. Additionally, we have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, delays between raising capital and acquiring real estate investments. We temporarily invest unused proceeds from our public offering in investments that typically yield lower returns when compared to our real estate investments. We may need to use short-term borrowings or advances from affiliates in order to maintain our current per share distribution levels in future periods. However, we will continue to make investment and financing decisions, and decisions regarding distribution payments, with a long-term view. We will also continually monitor our cash flow and market conditions when making such decisions. In this environment, we may lower our per share distribution amount rather than take actions we believe may compromise our long-term objectives.

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

Our direct investments in real estate assets generate cash flow in the form of rental revenues, which are reduced by debt service, direct leasing costs and property-level operating expenses. Property-level operating expenses consist primarily of salaries and wages of property management personnel, utilities, cleaning, insurance, security and building maintenance costs, property management and leasing fees and property taxes. Additionally, we have incurred corporate-level debt service, general and administrative expenses, asset management and acquisition fees. During the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, net cash flow provided by (used in) operating activities was $17.2 million, $7.7 million and $(1.8) million, respectively. The increase compared to the corresponding prior-year period is primarily attributable to:

•  a full year of operations for each of Airport Corporate Center, 321 North Clark, 3400 Data Drive, Watergate Tower IV and the Daytona Buildings all of which were acquired in 2006; and

•  cash flow from the Laguna Buildings, Atrium on Bay, Seattle Design Center, 5th and Bell, 3 Huntington Quadrangle, One Wilshire, Minneapolis Office/Flex Portfolio, JPMorgan Chase Tower and our investment in HCB II River LLC, all of which were acquired in 2007.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

During the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 we had cash outflows totaling $1,175.4 million, $586.8 million and $153.0 million, respectively, related to the acquisition of office properties and their related lease intangibles. The increase in outflows is due to an increase in the number of properties acquired

57

during each year. During the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 we directly acquired interests in eight office properties, five office properties and three office properties, respectively.

During the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, we made capital contributions to the Core Fund totaling $58.0 million, $209.3 million and $99.9 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2007, we had invested $395.5 million in the Core Fund representing an approximate 32% non-managing general partner interest compared to the approximate 34.0% and 26.2% interest we owned at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, we received distributions from the Core Fund totaling $25.4 million, $14.8 million and $5.3 million, respectively.

During the year ended December 31, 2007 we made capital contributions to HCB II River LLC, a joint venture with an affiliate of Hines, totaling $28.9 million, representing an approximate 50% interest. During the year ended December 31, 2007, we received distributions from HCB II River LLC totaling $1.0 million, of which $385,000 was recorded in cash flows from operating activities as it did not exceed our equity in earnings.

During the year ended December 31, 2007, we had cash outflows of $5.7 million, net of receipts, for master leases entered into in connection with our acquisitions.

During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, we had increases in restricted cash of approximately $712,000 and $2.5 million, respectively, related to certain escrows required by our mortgage agreements.

During the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, we had cash outflows in other assets of $10.0 million and $8.9 million, and $5.0 million, respectively, primarily as a result of deposits paid on investment properties that were acquired subsequent to the applicable year-end.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

Equity Offerings

The following table summarizes the activity from our offerings through December 31, 2004 and for each of the years ended December 31, 2005 through 2007 (in millions):

	Initial Public Offering						Current Public Offering						All Offerings
Year Ended	# of Shares			Proceeds			# of Shares			Proceeds			# of Shares		Proceeds
December 31, 2004		2.1		$	20.6			—		$	—			2.1	$	20.6
December 31, 2005		21.0	(1)		207.7	(1)		—			—			21.0		207.7
December 31, 2006		30.1	(2)		299.2	(2)		27.3	(2)		282.7	(2)		57.4		581.9
December 31, 2007		—			—			80.3	(3)		834.8	(3)		80.3		834.8
Total		53.2		$	527.5			107.6		$	1,117.5			160.8	$	1,645.0

(1)	Amounts include $2.1 million of gross proceeds relating to approximately 223,000 shares issued under our dividend reinvestment plan.
(2)	Amounts include $13.5 million of gross proceeds relating to 1.4 million shares issued under our dividend reinvestment plan.
(3)	Amounts include $37.4 million of gross proceeds relating to 3.8 million shares issued under our dividend reinvestment plan.

As of December 31, 2007, $929.3 million in common shares remained available for sale pursuant to our Current Offering, exclusive of $153.2 million in common shares available under our dividend reinvestment plan.

58

Payment of Offering and Other Costs and Expenses

In addition to making investments in accordance with our investment objectives, we use our capital resources to pay the Dealer Manager and our Advisor, for services they provide to us during the various phases of our organization and operations. During the offering stage, we pay the Dealer Manager selling commissions and dealer manager fees, and we reimburse the Advisor for organizational and offering costs.

For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, we paid the Dealer Manager selling commissions of $53.8 million, $34.0 million, and $10.5 million, respectively, and we paid dealer manager fees of $17.4 million, $13.4 million, and $3.7 million, respectively. All such selling commissions and a portion of such Dealer Manager fees were reallowed by HRES to participating broker dealers for their services in selling our shares.

During the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Advisor incurred organizational and internal offering costs related to the Initial Offering totaling $3.0 million and $6.5 million, respectively, and third-party offering costs of $3.6 million and $6.3 million, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, we made payments totaling $10.0 million and $6.0 million, respectively, to our Advisor for reimbursement of Initial Offering organizational and offering costs. The Initial Offering terminated in June 2006. No additional costs were incurred during the year ender December 31, 2007.

During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Advisor incurred organizational and internal offering costs related to the Current Offering totaling $7.6 million and $4.7 million and third-party offering costs of $9.0 million and $6.4 million, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, we made payments totaling $19.3 million and $7.5 million, respectively, to our Advisor for reimbursement of current offering organizational and offering costs. The amount of organizational and offering costs, commissions and dealer manager fees we paid during the year ended December 31, 2007 increased, as compared to such periods in 2006 and 2005, as a result of an increase in capital raised through our Current Offering during 2007. See “Critical Accounting Policies — Organizational and Offering Costs” above for additional information.

59

Debt Financings

The following table includes all of our outstanding notes payable as of December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 (in thousands, except interest rates). Additional information regarding general terms and conditions of each of our notes payable follows the table:

								Principal			Principal
								Outstanding at			Outstanding at
	Origination							December 31,			December 31,
Description	Date		Maturity Date		Interest Rate			2007			2006
SECURED MORTGAGE DEBT
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. — Airport Corporate Center		1/31/2006		3/11/2009		4.775	%	$	90,039	(4)	$	89,233
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company — 1515 S. Street		4/18/2006		5/1/2011		5.680	%		45,000	(6)		45,000
Capmark Finance, Inc. — Atrium on Bay		2/26/2007		2/26/2017		5.330	%		193,686	(3)		—
The Prudential Insurance Company of America — One Wilshire		10/25/2007		11/1/2012		5.980	%		159,500			—
HSH POOLED MORTGAGE FACILITY
HSH Nordbank — Citymark, 321 North Clark, 1900 and 2000 Alameda		8/1/2006		8/1/2016		5.8575	%(2)		185,000			185,000
HSH Nordbank — 3400 Data Drive, Watergate Tower IV		1/23/2007		1/12/2017		5.2505	%(2)		98,000			—
HSH Nordbank — Daytona and Laguna Buildings		5/2/2007		5/2/2017		5.3550	%(2)		119,000			—
HSH Nordbank — 3 Huntington Quadrangle		7/19/2007		7/19/2017		5.9800	%(2)		48,000			—
HSH Nordbank — Seattle Design Center/5th and Bell		8/14/2007		8/14/2017		6.0300	%(2)		70,000			—
MET LIFE SECURED MORTGAGE FACILITY
Met Life — JPMorgan Chase Tower/Minneapolis Office/Flex Portfolio		12/20/2007		12/20/2012		5.70	%		205,000			—
OTHER NOTES PAYABLE
KeyBank Revolving Credit Facility		9/9/2005		10/31/2009		Variable(1	)		—			162,000
Atrium Note Payable		9/1/2004		10/1/2011		7.390	%		3,406	(5)		—
								$	1,216,631		$	481,233

(1)	The weighted average interest rate on outstanding borrowings under this facility was 6.73% as of December 31, 2006.
(2)	We entered into an interest rate swap agreement which effectively fixed the interest rate of this borrowing at the specified rate.
(3)	We entered into mortgage financing in connection with our acquisition of Atrium on Bay. The mortgage agreement provided for an interest only loan with a principal amount of $190.0 million Canadian dollars as of December 31, 2007. This amount was translated to U.S. dollars at a rate of $1.0194 as of December 31, 2007.
(4)	This mortgage is an interest-only loan in the principal amount of $91.0 million, which we assumed in connection with our acquisition of Airport Corporate Center. At the time of acquisition, the fair value of this mortgage was estimated to be $88.5 million, resulting in a premium of $2.5 million. The premium is being amortized over the term of the mortgage.
(5)	Note payable to Citicorp Vendor Finance Ltd. related to installation of certain equipment at Atrium on Bay. This amount was translated to U.S. dollars at a rate of $1.0194 as of December 31, 2007.
(6)	We entered into mortgage financing in connection with our acquisition of 1515 S. Street. The mortgage agreement provided for an interest only loan with a principal amount of $45.0 million.

Revolving Credit Facility with KeyBank National Association

We are party to a credit agreement with KeyBank National Association (“KeyBank”), as administrative agent for itself and various other lenders named in the credit agreement, which provides for a revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) with maximum aggregate borrowing capacity of up to $250.0 million. We established this facility to repay certain bridge financing incurred in connection with certain of our

60

acquisitions and to provide a source of funds for future real estate investments and to fund our general working capital needs.

The Revolving Credit Facility has a maturity date of October 31, 2009, which is subject to extension at our election for two successive periods of one year each, subject to specified conditions. We may increase the amount of the facility to a maximum of $350.0 million upon written notice prior to May 8, 2008, subject to KeyBank’s ability to syndicate the additional amount. The facility allows, at our election, for borrowing at a variable rate or a LIBOR-based rate plus a spread ranging from 125 to 200 basis points based on prescribed leverage ratios.

In addition to customary covenants and events of default, the Revolving Credit Facility provides that it shall be an event of default under the agreement if our Advisor ceases to be controlled by Hines or if Hines ceases to be majority-owned and controlled, directly or indirectly, by Jeffrey C. Hines or certain members of his family. The amounts outstanding under this facility are secured by a pledge of the Operating Partnership’s equity interests in entities that directly or indirectly hold real property assets, including our interest in the Core Fund, subject to certain limitations and exceptions. We have entered into a subordination agreement with Hines and our Advisor, which provides that the rights of Hines and the Advisor to be reimbursed by us for organizational and offering and other expenses are subordinate to our obligations under the Revolving Credit Facility. We have complied with all covenants of the Revolving Credit Facility as of December 31, 2007.

HSH Pooled Mortgage Facility

On August 1, 2006 (as amended on January 19, 2007), certain of our subsidiaries entered into a credit agreement with HSH Nordbank AG, New York Branch (“HSH Nordbank”) providing for a secured credit facility in the maximum principal amount of $520.0 million (the “HSH Credit Facility”), subject to certain borrowing limitations. The total borrowing capacity under the HSH Credit Facility was based upon a percentage of the appraised values of the properties that we selected to serve as collateral under this facility, subject to certain debt service coverage limitations. Amounts drawn under the HSH Credit Facility bear interest at variable interest rates based on one-month LIBOR plus an applicable margin. We purchased interest rate protection in the form of interest rate swap agreements prior to borrowing any amounts under the HSH Credit Facility to secure it against fluctuations of LIBOR. Loans under the HSH Credit Facility may be prepaid in whole or in part, subject to the payment of certain prepayment fees and breakage costs. As of December 31, 2007, we had $520.0 million outstanding under the HSH Credit Facility, therefore we have no remaining borrowing capacity under this credit facility.

The Operating Partnership provides customary non-recourse carve-out guarantees under the HSH Credit Facility and limited guarantees with respect to the payment and performance of (i) certain tenant improvement and leasing commission obligations in the event the properties securing the loan fail to meet certain occupancy requirements and (ii) certain major capital repairs with respect to the properties securing the loans.

The HSH Credit Facility provides that an event of default will exist if a change in majority ownership or control occurs for the Advisor or Hines, or if the Advisor no longer provides advisory services or manages theday-to-day operations of Hines REIT. The HSH Credit Facility also contains other customary events of default, some with corresponding cure periods, including, without limitation, payment defaults, cross-defaults to other agreements evidencing indebtedness and bankruptcy-related defaults, and customary covenants, including limitations on the incurrence of debt and granting of liens and the maintenance of certain financial ratios. We have complied with all covenants of the HSH Credit Facility as of December 31, 2007.

Secured Mortgage Facility with Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

On December 20, 2007, a subsidiary of the Operating Partnership entered into a credit agreement with Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“Met Life”), which provides a secured credit facility to the borrower and certain of our subsidiaries in the maximum principal amount of $750.0 million (the “Met Life Credit Facility”), subject to certain borrowing limitations. Borrowings under the Met Life Credit Facility may be drawn at any time until December 20, 2009, subject to the approval of Met Life. Such borrowings will be in the form of interest-only loans with fixed rates of interest which will be negotiated separately for each

61

borrowing and will have terms of five to ten years. Each loan will contain a prepayment lockout period of two years and thereafter, prepayment will be permitted subject to certain fees.

The Met Life Credit Facility also contains other customary events of default, some with corresponding cure periods, including, without limitation, payment defaults, cross-defaults to other agreements evidencing indebtedness and bankruptcy-related defaults, and customary covenants, including limitations on the incurrence of debt and granting of liens and the maintenance of minimumloan-to-value and debt service coverage ratios. We have complied with all covenants of the Met Life Credit Facility as of December 31, 2007.

Additional Debt Secured by Investment Property

From time to time, we obtain mortgage financing for our properties outside of the credit facilities described above. These mortgages contain fixed rates of interest and are secured by the property to which they relate. These mortgage agreements contain customary events of default, with corresponding grace periods, including payment defaults, cross-defaults to other agreements and bankruptcy-related defaults, and customary covenants, including limitations on liens and indebtedness and maintenance of certain financial ratios. In addition, we have executed customary recourse carve-out guarantees of certain obligations under our mortgage agreements and the other loan documents. We have complied with all covenants related to these agreements as of December 31, 2007.

Advances from affiliates

Certain costs and expenses associated with our organization and public offerings have been paid by our Advisor on our behalf. See “Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources — Payment of Offering Costs and Other Expenses” above for a discussion of these advances and our repayment of the same.

Our Advisor has also advanced funds to us to allow us to pay certain of our corporate-level operating expenses. During the year ended December 31, 2005, our Advisor made advances to us or made payments on our behalf totaling $2.2 million. During that period, our Advisor forgave $1.7 million of amounts previously advanced to us to pay these expenses and we made repayments totaling $375,000. As of December 31, 2005 (after taking into account our Advisor’s forgiveness referred to above), we owed our Advisor $1.0 million for these advances. For the year ended December 31, 2006, our Advisor had advanced to or made payments on our behalf totaling $1.6 million and we made repayments totaling $2.7 million. We did not receive any advances from our Advisor after June 30, 2006 and as of December 31, 2006, we had repaid our Advisor all amounts related to these advances.

To the extent that our operating expenses in any four consecutive fiscal quarters exceed the greater of 2% of average invested assets or 25% of Net Income (as defined in our Articles of Incorporation), our Advisor is required to reimburse us the amount by which the total operating expenses paid or incurred exceed the greater of the 2% or 25% threshold, unless our independent directors determine that such excess was justified. For the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, we did not exceed this limitation.

Distributions

In order to meet the requirements for being treated as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and to pay regular cash distributions to our shareholders, which is one of our investment objectives, we have and intend to continue to declare distributions to shareholders as of daily record dates and aggregate and pay such distributions quarterly.

From January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007, with the authority of our board of directors, we declared distributions equal to $0.00170959 per share, per day. Additionally, we have declared distributions equal to $0.00170959 per share, per day for the period from January 1, 2008 through April 30, 2008. The distributions declared were set by our board of directors at a level the board believed to be appropriate based upon the board’s evaluation of our assets, historical and projected levels of cash flow and results of operations, additional capital and debt anticipated to be raised or incurred and invested in the future, the historical and

62

projected timing between receiving offering proceeds and investing such proceeds in real estate investments, and general market conditions and trends.

Aggregate distributions declared to our shareholders and minority interests related to the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 were $80.4 million and $31.0 million, respectively. Our primary sources of funding for our distributions are cash flows from operating activities and distributions from the Core Fund. When analyzing the amount of cash flow available to pay distributions, we also consider the impact of certain other factors, including our practice of financing acquisition fees and other acquisition-related cash flows, which are reductions of cash flows from operating activities in our statements of cash flows. The following table summarizes the primary sources and other factors we considered in our analysis of cash flows available to fund distributions to shareholders and minority interests (amounts are in thousands and are approximate):

	2007		2006
Cash flow from operating activities	$	17,190	$	7,662
Distributions from the Core Fund(1)	$	26,394	$	17,069
Distributions from HCB II River LLC(2)	$	594		—
Cash acquisition fees(3)	$	8,576	$	4,008
Acquisition-related items(4)	$	11,696	$	7,649
Master lease rent receipts(5)	$	5,870		—

(1)	Cash distributions declared by the Core Fund during the year ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 are related to our investments in the Core Fund.
(2)	We received distributions related to our interest in HCB II River LLC. These amounts represent distributions received during the year ended December 31, 2007 in excess of our equity in earnings of HCB II River LLC.
(3)	Acquisition fees paid to our Advisor reduce cash flows from operating activities in our consolidated statements of cash flows. However, we fund such payments with offering proceeds and related acquisition indebtedness as such payments are transaction costs associated with our acquisitions of real estate investments. As a result, we considered the payment of acquisition fees in our analysis of cash flow available to pay distributions.
(4)	Acquisition-related items include cash payments to settle net liabilities assumed upon acquisition of properties. These payments reduce cash flows from operating activities in our consolidated statements of cash flows. However, these payments are related to the acquisition, as opposed to the operations, of these properties, and we fund such payments with offering proceeds and acquisition-related indebtedness. As a result, we considered the payment of these items in our analysis of cash flow available to pay distributions.
(5)	Master lease rent receipts include rent payments received related to master leases entered into in conjunction with previous asset acquisitions. In accordance with GAAP, these payments are recorded in cash flows from investing activities in our condensed consolidated statement of cash flows. However, we consider these cash receipts in our analysis of cash flow available to pay distributions.

Additionally, we typically use cash flows from financing activities such as offering proceeds or borrowings, rather than operating cash flows, to pay for deferred leasing costs, such as tenant incentive payments, leasing commissions and tenant improvements. For the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, we paid $14.2 million and $2.3 million for deferred leasing costs, respectively, which were reflected as a reduction of cash flows from operating activities in our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in thisForm 10-K.

From our inception to December 31, 2005, we funded distributions payable to shareholders and minority interests in the aggregate amount of $7.6 million with distributions we earned related to our investment in the Core Fund of $8.9 million, partially offset by net cash flow used in operating activities of $3.0 million, adjusted for $2.0 million of cash acquisition fees paid to our Advisor, which were funded out of net offering proceeds, as opposed to being funded from our operations.

63

In our initial quarters of operations, such sources were insufficient to fund our distributions to shareholders and minority interests and to repay advances from our Advisor or its affiliates. As a result, in order to cover the shortfall in such quarters, we deferred reimbursement to our Advisor for advances made to us to pay certain of our corporate-level general and administrative expenses. In 2005, our Advisor forgave $1.7 million of such advances. No advances were received after June 30, 2006, and as of December 31, 2006, we owed no amounts to our Advisor related to such advances. Our Advisor is not obligated to either advance funds for the payment of our general and administrative expenses or defer reimbursements of such advances in future periods. Our Advisor’s refusal to advance funds for the payment of our general and administrative expenses (in the case we were to seek such advances in order to maintain certain distribution levels)and/or to defer reimbursements of such advances could have an adverse impact on our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders in future periods.

As noted above in “— General”, debt capital has recently become more expensive and less available as a result of escalating defaults in residential sub-prime mortgages and the current state of the economy, and future potential weakening could negatively impact office fundamentals, potentially resulting in lower occupancy, rental rates and values of our assets. Given those challenges, acquisitions in such an environment may put downward pressure on our distribution payments as a result of potentially lower yields on new investments.

To the extent our distributions exceed our tax-basis earnings and profits, a portion of these distributions will constitute a return of capital for federal income tax purposes. Approximately 46% and 23% of our distributions paid during the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, were taxable to shareholders as ordinary taxable income and the remaining portion was treated as return of capital. We expect that a portion of distributions paid in future years will also constitute a return of capital for federal income tax purposes, primarily as a result of non-cash depreciation deductions.

Results of Operations

Overview

We commenced the Initial Offering in June 2004; however, we did not receive and accept the minimum offering proceeds of $10.0 million until November 23, 2004. Our $28.4 million investment in the Core Fund was our only real estate investment as of December 31, 2004.

During the year ended December 31, 2005, we invested $99.9 million in the Core Fund and acquired direct interests in three office properties with an aggregate acquisition cost of $154.2 million. Accordingly, our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2005 consisted primarily of organizational and offering expenses, general and administrative expenses and equity in losses of the Core Fund. As of December 31, 2005, the Core Fund owned interests in ten office properties with an aggregate acquisition cost of $1,691.1 million.

During the year ended December 31, 2006, we acquired direct interests in five additional office properties with an aggregate acquisition cost of $680.8 million and invested an additional $209.3 million in the Core Fund. In addition, the Core Fund acquired interests in five additional office properties with an aggregate acquisition cost of $1.2 billion during the year.

During the year ended December 31, 2007, we acquired direct interests in eight additional office properties with an aggregate acquisition cost of over $1.2 billion and invested an additional $58.0 million in the Core Fund. In addition, the Core Fund acquired interests in nine additional office properties with an aggregate acquisition cost of over $1.1 billion during this period. We also acquired a 50% interest in HCB II River, LLC, a joint venture with a Hines affiliate for $28.9 million. As of December 31, 2007, HCB II River LLC, owned one industrial property in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 are not directly comparable as a result of our significant acquisition activity in 2007 and 2006. As discussed below, increases in operating revenues and expenses as well as distributions from the Core Fund are primarily attributable to our direct and indirect real estate acquisitions after December 31, 2005, in addition to the operation of existing

64

properties for the full period. For example, acquisitions made during the year ended December 31, 2007 accounted for approximately 44% of total revenues and 35% of total expenses for the year ended December 31, 2007. Acquisitions made during the year ended December 31, 2006 accounted for approximately 70% of total revenues and 46% of total expenses for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Our results of operations are also not indicative of what we expect our results of operations will be in future periods as we expect that our operating revenues and expenses and distributions from the Core Fund will continue to increase as a result of (i) owning the real estate investments we acquired during the last 12 months for an entire period, and (ii) our future real estate investments, which we expect to be substantial.

Direct Investments

As discussed above, our initial direct property investments were made in June 2005, August 2005, and November 2005. Therefore, we had only limited rental revenues and expenses related to these properties for the year ended December 31, 2005.

Rental revenues for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 were $166.6 million and $61.4 million, respectively. Property-level expenses, property taxes and property management fees for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 were $78.4 million and $28.7 million, respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 was $68.2 million and $22.5 million, respectively.

Our Interest in the Core Fund

As of December 31, 2005, we had invested a total of $128.2 million and owned an approximate 26.2% non-managing general partner interest in the Core Fund. Our equity in losses related to our investment in the Core Fund for the year ended December 31, 2005 was approximately $831,000. For the year ended December 31, 2005, the Core Fund had a net loss of $3.1 million on revenues of $200.7 million and included $58.2 million of non-cash depreciation and amortization expenses. The distributions declared by the Core Fund during the year ended December 31, 2005 totaled $8.6 million.

As of December 31, 2006, we had invested a total of $337.6 million and owned a 34.0% non-managing general partner interest in the Core Fund. Our equity in losses related to our investment in the Core Fund for the year ended December 31, 2006 was $3.3 million. For the year ended December 31, 2006, the Core Fund had a net loss of $9.9 million on revenues of $279.9 million and included $87.7 million of non-cash depreciation and amortization expenses. The distributions declared by the Core Fund during the year ended December 31, 2006 totaled $17.1 million.

As of December 31, 2007, we had invested a total of $395.5 million and owned a 32.0% non-managing general partner interest in the Core Fund. Our equity in losses related to our investment in the Core Fund for the year ended December 31, 2007 was $8.7 million. For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Core Fund had a net loss of $26.5 million on revenues of $411.1 million and included $172.0 million of non-cash depreciation and amortization expenses. The distributions declared by the Core Fund during the year ended December 31, 2007 totaled $26.4 million.

Our Interest in HCB II River LLC

As of December 31, 2007, we had a $28.9 million investment, representing a 50.0% non-managing interest in HCB II River LLC. Our equity in earnings related to our investment in HCB II River LLC for the year ended December 31, 2007 was approximately $385,000. For the year ended December 31, 2007, HCB II River LLC had net income of approximately $728,000 on revenues of $3.2 million.

Asset Management and Acquisition Fees

Asset management fees for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 were $16.4 million, $6.3 million, and $1.7 million, respectively. Increases in asset management fees are the result of our having a larger portfolio of assets under management in each respective year. Acquisition fees for the years ended

65

December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005 were $13.6 million, $11.2 million, and $3.5 million, respectively. Increases compared to the prior years are attributable to an increase in investment activity during each respective year.

These amounts include both the cash portion of the fees payable to our Advisor as well as the corresponding increase in the Participation Interest. See “Note 6 — Related Party Transactions” in our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in thisForm 10-K for a description of the Participation Interest.

General, Administrative and Other Expenses

General and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 were $4.6 million, $2.8 million, and $2.2 million, respectively. These costs include legal and accounting fees, insurance costs, costs and expenses associated with our board of directors and other administrative expenses. Certain of these costs are variable and may increase in the future as we continue to raise capital and make additional real estate investments. In addition, as discussed above, our Advisor forgave $1.7 million of advances to us to cover certain corporate-level general and administrative expenses during the year ended December 31, 2005. The increases in general and administrative expenses during the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 are primarily due to increased costs of shareholder communications and audit fees as the Company’s activities and shareholder base continue to grow. The Company also incurred additional costs in 2007 related to compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Derivative Instruments

During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, we entered into several forward interest rate swap transactions with HSH Nordbank. These swap transactions were entered into as economic hedges against the variability of future interest rates on our variable interest rate borrowings with HSH Nordbank. We have not designated any of these contracts as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes.

The interest rate swaps have been recorded at their estimated fair value in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2007 and 2006. The fair value of the interest rate swaps decreased substantially during 2007 as a result of reductions in the underlying interest rates. The loss resulting from the decrease in the fair value of the interest rate swaps for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 of $25.5 million and $5.3 million, respectively (including fees of approximately $731,000 and $862,000 incurred upon entering into these swap transactions respectively), has been recorded in loss on derivative instruments, net in the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006. We will continue to mark the interest rate swap contracts to their estimated fair value as of each balance sheet date, and the changes in fair value will be reflected in the consolidated statements of operations.

The table below provides additional information regarding each of our outstanding interest rate swaps and the fixed effective rates as a result of these agreements of December 31, 2007:

Effective Date	Expiration Date	Notional Amount		Interest Rate
		(In thousands)
August 1, 2006	August 1, 2016	$	185,000		5.8575	%
January 12, 2007	January 12, 2017	$	98,000		5.2505	%
May 2, 2007	May 2, 2017	$	119,000		5.3550	%
July 19, 2007	July 19, 2017	$	48,000		5.9800	%
August 14, 2007	August 14, 2017	$	70,000		6.0300	%

In addition to the interest rate contracts described above, we entered into a foreign currency contract in February 2007 related to our acquisition of a property in Toronto, Ontario. The contract was entered into as an economic hedge against the variability of the foreign currency exchange rate related to our equity investment and was settled at the close of this acquisition. As a result of this transaction, we recorded a gain of approximately $939,000, net of fees incurred upon entering into the swap transaction, in loss on derivative instruments, net in our consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2007.

66

Interest Expense

Interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $47.8 million, $18.3 million and $2.4 million, respectively. The increase in interest expense is primarily due to increased borrowings related to our acquisitions of directly-owned properties and our investments in the Core Fund during 2007. Average debt outstanding during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $848.9 million, $278.1 million and $37.5 million, respectively.

Interest Income

Interest income for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was approximately $5.3 million, $1.4 million and $98,000, respectively. The increase in interest income is primarily due to increased cash we held in short-term investments during delays between raising capital and acquiring real estate investments.

Income Tax

The provision for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2007 was $1.1 million and was primarily related to our property in Toronto, Ontario, which we acquired during 2007.

Income/Loss Allocated to Minority Interests

As of December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, Hines REIT owned a 97.6%, 97.4%, and 94.2% interest in the Operating Partnership, respectively, and affiliates of Hines owned the remaining 2.4%, 2.6%, and 5.8% interests, respectively. We allocated income of $1.3 million to the holders of these minority interests for the years ended December 31, 2007. We allocated losses of $429,000 and $635,000 to the holders of these minority interests for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Related-Party Transactions and Agreements

We have entered into agreements with the Advisor, Dealer Manager and Hines or its affiliates, whereby we pay certain fees and reimbursements to these entities, including acquisition fees, selling commissions, dealer-manager fees, asset and property management fees, construction management fees, reimbursement of organizational and offering costs, and reimbursement of certain operating costs, as described previously.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Contractual Obligations

The following table lists our known contractual obligations as of December 31, 2007. Specifically included are our obligations under long-term debt agreements, operating lease agreements and outstanding purchase obligations (in thousands):

	Payments Due by Period
	Less Than						More than
Contractual Obligation	1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		5 Years		Total
Notes payable(1)	$	68,308	$	219,831	$	533,609	$	876,500	$	1,698,248
Ground lease obligation		405		831		866		10,339		12,441
Obligation to purchase Raytheon/DirecTV Buildings		120,000		—		—		—		120,000
Total Contractual Obligations	$	188,713	$	220,662	$	534,475	$	886,839	$	1,830,689

67

(1) Notes payable includes principal and interest payments on mortgage agreements outstanding as December 31, 2007. Interest payments due to HSH Nordbank were determined using effective interest rates which were fixed as a result of interest rate swaps. See “Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources — Debt Financings” for further information.

Recent Developments and Subsequent Events

2555 Grand

On February 29, 2008, we acquired 2555 Grand, a 24-story office building located in the Crown Center submarket of Kansas City, Missouri. 2555 Grand was constructed in 2003 and consists of 595,607 square feet of rentable area that is 100% leased to Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P, an international law firm, under a lease that expires in February 2024. The contract purchase price for 2555 Grand was $155.8 million, exclusive of transaction costs, financing fees and working capital reserves.

The Raytheon/DirecTV Buildings

On March 13, 2008, we acquired the Raytheon/DirecTV Buildings, a complex consisting of two eleven-story office buildings located in the South Bay submarket of El Segundo, California. Raytheon Company, a defense and aerospace systems supplier, leases 100% of the rentable area under a lease that expires in December 2008. DirecTV, a satellite television provider, subleases 205,202 square feet, or approximately 37% of the buildings’ rentable area, under a lease that expires in December 2008. Raytheon has executed a lease for 345,377 square feet, or approximately 63% of the buildings’ rentable area, which commences January 1, 2009, and expires on December 31, 2018. DirecTV has executed a lease for 205,202 square feet, or approximately 37% of the buildings’ rentable area, which commences January 1, 2009, and expires on December 31, 2013. The contract purchase price was $120.0 million.

In connection with our acquisition of the Raytheon/DirecTV Buildings, we assumed a $54.2 million mortgage loan with IXIS Real Estate Capital Inc. The loan bears interest at an effective fixed rate of 5.675%, matures on December 5, 2016 and is secured by the Raytheon/DirecTV Buildings. The loan documents contain customary events of default with corresponding grace periods, including, without limitation, payment defaults, cross-defaults to other agreements and bankruptcy-related defaults, and customary covenants, including limitations on the incurrence of debt and granting of liens. This loan is not recourse to Hines REIT.

One North Wacker

On February 22, 2008, the Core Fund entered into a contract to acquire 51-story office building located in the West Loop submarket of the central business district of Chicago, Illinois (“One North Wacker”). One North Wacker consists of approximately 1.4 million square feet and is approximately 98% leased. UBS, a financial institution, leases 452,049 square feet or approximately 33% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in September 2012. PriceWaterhouseCoopers, an accounting firm, leases 256,477 square feet or approximately 19% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in October 2013. Citadel, a financial institution, leases 161,488 square feet or approximately 12% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in August 2012. The contract purchase price of One North Wacker is expected to be approximately $540.0 million, exclusive of transaction costs, financing fees and working capital. There can be no assurances that this acquisition will be consummated.

Williams Tower

On March 18, 2008, we entered into a contract to acquire: (i) Williams Tower, a 65-story office building with an adjacent parking garage located in the Galleria/West Loop submarket of Houston, Texas; (ii) a 47.8% undivided interest in a 2.8-acre park and waterwall adjacent to Williams Tower; and (iii) a2.3-acre land parcel located across the street from Williams Tower on Post Oak Blvd. The balance of the undivided interest in the park and waterwall is owned by an affiliate of Hines.

68

Williams Tower was constructed in 1982 and consists of approximately 1.5 million square feet of rentable area that is approximately 91% leased. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp, a natural gas pipe line operator, leases 250,001 square feet or approximately 16% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in March 2014 and contains options to renew for three additional five-year periods. Black Box Network Services (formerly known as NextiraOne, LLC), a telecommunications infrastructure provider, leases 186,777 square feet or approximately 12% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in March 2009. The remaining lease space is leased to 48 tenants, none of which leases more than 10% of the building’s rentable area. Williams Tower is currently managed by Hines. In addition, our headquarters is located in Williams Tower and Hines and its affiliates lease space in Williams Tower. In the aggregate, Hines and its affiliates lease 9% of the building’s net rentable area.

The contract purchase price for Williams Tower is expected to be approximately $271.5 million, exclusive of transaction costs, financing fees and working capital reserves and we expect this acquisition to close on or about May 1, 2008. There can be no assurances that this acquisition will be consummated.

Shareholder Redemption

From January 1, 2008 to March 14, 2008, in accordance with our share redemption plan, we redeemed approximately 789,600 common shares and made corresponding payments totaling $7.5 million to shareholders who had requested these redemptions. The shares redeemed were cancelled and will have the status of authorized, but unissued shares.

Other

From January 1, 2008 through March 14, 2008, we have received gross offering proceeds of $103.6 million from the sale of 9.9 million common shares, including $13.6 million of gross proceeds relating to 1.4 million shares sold under our dividend reinvestment plan. As of March 14, 2008, 839.4 million common shares remained available for sale to the public pursuant to the Current Offering, exclusive of 139.6 million common shares available under our dividend reinvestment plan.

From January 1, 2008 through March 20, 2008, we incurred $63.0 million of additional borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility all of which was outstanding as of March 20, 2008.

Item 7A.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Market risk includes risks relating to changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices and other market changes that affect market sensitive instruments. We are exposed to both interest rate risk and foreign currency exchange rate risk.

The commercial real estate debt markets have recently been experiencing volatility as a result of certain factors including the tightening of underwriting standards by lenders and credit rating agencies and the significant inventory of unsold Collateralized Mortgage Backed Securities in the market. This has resulted in lenders decreasing the availability of debt financing as well as increasing the cost of debt financing. As our existing debt is either fixed rate debt or floating rate debt with a fixed spread over LIBOR, we do not believe that our current portfolio is materially impacted by the current debt market environment. However, should the reduced availability of debtand/or the increased cost of borrowings continue, either by increases in the index rates or by increases in lender spreads, we will need to consider such factors in the evaluation of future acquisitions. For example, during 2007, we borrowed $893.2 million through various secured permanent financing vehicles at a weighted average interest rate of 5.62%. If, in the future, interest rates of these secured permanent financing vehicles increase by 1.0% and we obtained the same level of financing as in 2007, we would incur additional interest charges of $8.9 million annually. This may result in future acquisitions generating lower overall economic returns and potentially reducing future cash flow available for distribution.

In addition, the state of the debt markets could have an impact on the overall amount of capital investing in real estate which may result in price or value decreases of real estate assets. Although this may benefit us for future acquisitions, it could negatively impact the current value of our existing assets.

69

We are also exposed to the effects of interest rate changes primarily through variable-rate debt, which we use to maintain liquidity and fund expansion of our real estate investment portfolio and operations. Our interest rate risk management objectives are to monitor and manage the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows, and to use derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps and caps in order to mitigate our interest rate risk on variable rate debt. We do not enter into derivative or interest rate transactions for speculative purposes. Please see “Debt Financings” above for more information concerning the Company’s outstanding debt.

As of December 31, 2007, we had $520.0 million of debt outstanding under our HSH Credit Facility, which is a variable-rate pooled mortgage facility. However, as a result of the interest rate swap agreements entered into with HSH Nordbank, these borrowings effectively bear interest at fixed rates ranging from 5.25% to 6.03%.

Derivative financial instruments expose us to credit risk in the event of non-performance by the counterparties under the terms of the interest rate swap agreements. We minimized our credit risk on these transactions by dealing with HSH Nordbank, a major creditworthy financial institution. We believe the likelihood of realized losses from counterparty non-performance is remote.

We are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate variations resulting from the remeasurement and translation of the financial statements of our subsidiaries located in Toronto, Ontario. As of December 31, 2007, we recorded a gain on foreign currency transactions of approximately $134,000 in our consolidated statement of operations and $12.5 million of accumulated other comprehensive income included in our consolidated statement of shareholders’ equity related to our Toronto subsidiaries. Based on the Company’s current operational strategies, management does not believe that variations in the foreign currency exchange rates pose a significant risk to our consolidated results of operations or financial position.

Item 8.   Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

70

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of

Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.

Houston, Texas

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Houston, Texas

March 27, 2008

71

HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

As of December 31, 2007 and 2006

	December 31,			December 31,
	2007			2006
	(In thousands, except
	per share information)
ASSETS
Investment property, net	$	2,051,890		$	798,329
Investment in unconsolidated entities		361,157			307,553
Cash and cash equivalents		152,443			23,022
Restricted cash		3,463			2,483
Distributions receivable		6,890			5,858
Interest rate swap contracts		—			1,511
Tenant and other receivables		28,518			5,172
Out-of-market lease assets, net		43,800			36,414
Deferred leasing costs, net		34,954			17,189
Deferred financing costs, net		7,638			5,412
Other assets		12,870			10,719
TOTAL ASSETS	$	2,703,623		$	1,213,662
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	66,267		$	28,899
Due to affiliates		8,968			8,954
Out-of-market lease liabilities, net		79,465			15,814
Other liabilities		17,128			6,488
Interest rate swap contracts		30,194			5,955
Participation interest liability		26,771			11,801
Distributions payable		24,923			11,281
Notes payable		1,216,631			481,233
Total liabilities		1,470,347			570,425
Minority interest		—			652
Commitments and Contingencies
Shareholders’ equity:
Preferred shares, $.001 par value; 500,000 preferred shares authorized, none issued or outstanding as of December 31, 2007 and 2006		—			—
Common shares, $.001 par value; 1,500,000 common shares authorized as of December 31, 2007 and 2006; 159,409 and 80,217 common shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively		159			80
Additional paid-in capital		1,358,523			692,780
Retained deficit		(137,915	)		(50,275	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		12,509			—
Total shareholders’ equity		1,233,276			642,585
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	2,703,623		$	1,213,662

See notes to the consolidated financial statements.

72

HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005

	Year Ended			Year Ended			Year Ended
	December 31,			December 31,			December 31,
	2007			2006			2005
	(In thousands, except per share information)
Revenues:
Rental revenue	$	166,610		$	61,422		$	6,005
Other revenue		12,966			2,508			242
Total revenues		179,576			63,930			6,247
Expenses:
Property operating expenses		48,221			17,584			2,184
Real property taxes		25,834			9,624			688
Property management fees		4,374			1,527			167
Depreciation and amortization		68,151			22,478			3,331
Asset management and acquisition fees		29,939			17,559			5,225
Organizational and offering expenses		7,583			5,760			1,736
Reversal of accrued organizational and offering expenses		—			—			(8,366	)
General and administrative expenses		4,570			2,819			2,224
Forgiveness of related party payable		—			—			(1,730	)
Total expenses		188,672			77,351			5,459
Income (loss) before equity in losses, interest expense, interest income and (income) loss allocated to minority interests		(9,096	)		(13,421	)		788
Equity in losses of unconsolidated entities, net		(8,288	)		(3,291	)		(831	)
Loss on derivative instruments, net		(25,542	)		(5,306	)		—
Gain on foreign currency transactions		134			—			—
Interest expense		(47,835	)		(18,310	)		(2,447	)
Interest income		5,321			1,409			98
Loss before income tax expense and (income) loss allocated to minority interests		(85,306	)		(38,919	)		(2,392	)
Provision for income taxes		(1,068	)		—			—
(Income) loss allocated to minority interests		(1,266	)		429			635
Net loss	$	(87,640	)	$	(38,490	)	$	(1,757	)
Basic and diluted loss per common share:
Loss per common share	$	(0.70	)	$	(0.79	)	$	(0.16	)
Weighted average number common shares outstanding		125,776			48,468			11,061

See notes to the consolidated financial statements.

73

HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005

																	Accumulated
											Additional						Other		Shareholders’
	Preferred				Common						Paid-In			Retained			Comprehensive		Equity
	Shares		Amount		Shares			Amount			Capital			Deficit			Income		(Deficit)
	(In thousands)
BALANCE, January 1, 2005		—		—		2,073			2			9,715			(10,028	)		—		(311	)
Issuance of common shares		—		—		20,973			21			207,642			—			—		207,663
Distributions declared		—		—		—			—			(6,637	)		—			—		(6,637	)
Selling commissions and dealer manager fees		—		—		—			—			(15,055	)		—			—		(15,055	)
Other offering costs, net		—		—		—			—			4,181			—			—		4,181
Net loss		—		—		—			—			—			(1,757	)		—		(1,757	)
BALANCE, December 31, 2005		—		—		23,046			23			199,846			(11,785	)		—		188,084
Issuance of common shares		—		—		57,422			57			581,948			—			—		582,005
Redemption of common shares		—		—		(251	)		—			(2,341	)		—			—		(2,341	)
Distributions declared		—		—		—			—			(29,840	)		—			—		(29,840	)
Selling commissions and dealer manager fees		—		—		—			—			(47,220	)		—			—		(47,220	)
Other offering costs, net		—		—		—			—			(9,613	)		—			—		(9,613	)
Net loss		—		—		—			—			—			(38,490	)		—		(38,490	)
BALANCE, December 31, 2006		—		—		80,217		$	80		$	692,780		$	(50,275	)		—	$	642,585
Issuance of common shares		—		—		80,307			80			834,707			—			—		834,787
Redemption of common shares		—		—		(1,115	)		(1	)		(10,583	)		—			—		(10,584	)
Distributions declared		—		—		—			—			(78,493	)		—			—		(78,493	)
Selling commissions and dealer manager fees		—		—		—			—			(70,938	)		—			—		(70,938	)
Other offering costs, net		—		—		—			—			(8,950	)		—			—		(8,950	)
Net loss		—		—		—			—			—			(87,640	)		—
Other comprehensive income — Foreign currency Translation adjustment		—		—		—			—			—			—			12,509
Total comprehensive loss		—		—		—			—			—			—			—		(75,131	)
BALANCE, December 31, 2007		—	$	—		159,409		$	159		$	1,358,523		$	(137,915	)	$	12,509	$	1,233,276

See notes to the consolidated financial statements.

74

HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005

	Year Ended			Year Ended			Year Ended
	December 31,			December 31,			December 31,
	2007			2006			2005
	(In thousands)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(87,640	)	$	(38,490	)	$	(1,757	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		68,599			25,130			4,633
Non-cash compensation expense		28			31			40
Equity in losses of unconsolidated entities		8,288			3,291			831
Distributions received from unconsolidated entities		385			—			—
Income (loss) allocated to minority interests		1,266			(429	)		(635	)
Accrual of organizational and offering expenses		7,583			5,760			1,736
Gain on foreign currency transactions		(134	)		—			—
Loss on derivative instruments		25,542			5,306			—
Reversal of accrual of organizational and offering expenses		—			—			(8,366	)
Forgiveness of related party payable		—			—			(1,730	)
Net change in operating accounts		(6,727	)		7,063			3,473
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		17,190			7,662			(1,775	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Investments in unconsolidated entities		(86,851	)		(209,339	)		(99,853	)
Distributions received from unconsolidated entities in excess of equity in earnings		25,955			14,809			5,278
Investments in property		(1,232,460	)		(572,333	)		(145,835	)
Investments in master leases		(11,537	)		—			—
Master lease rent receipts		5,870			—			—
Additions to other assets		(10,000	)		(8,858	)		(5,027	)
Settlement of foreign currency hedge		939			—			—
Increase in restricted cash		(712	)		(2,483	)		—
Increase (decrease) in acquired out-of-market leases		57,039			(14,483	)		(7,132	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(1,251,757	)		(792,687	)		(252,569	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Increase in escrowed investor proceeds		—			—			100
Increase in escrowed investor proceeds liability		—			—			(100	)
Increase (decrease) in unaccepted subscriptions for common shares		(645	)		1,157			606
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		797,315			568,465			205,506
Redemptions of common shares		(10,584	)		(2,341	)		—
Payments of selling commissions and dealer manager fees		(71,218	)		(47,444	)		(14,283	)
Payments of organizational and offering expenses		(19,304	)		(17,497	)		(6,000	)
Proceeds from advances from affiliate		—			1,602			2,173
Payment on advances from affiliate		—			(2,685	)		(375	)
Distributions paid to shareholders and minority interests		(29,324	)		(9,372	)		(2,242	)
Proceeds from notes payable		1,279,915			805,220			222,600
Payments on notes payable		(578,773	)		(488,120	)		(147,700	)
Increase in security deposit liability, net		22			11			—
Additions to deferred financing costs		(3,400	)		(6,243	)		(1,321	)
Payments related to forward interest swaps		(731	)		(862	)		—
Net cash provided by financing activities		1,363,273			801,891			258,964
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		715			—			—
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		129,421			16,866			4,620
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year		23,022			6,156			1,536
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year	$	152,443		$	23,022		$	6,156

See notes to the consolidated financial statements.

75

HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.   Organization

Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (“Hines REIT” and, together with its consolidated subsidiaries, the “Company”), was formed on August 5, 2003 under the General Corporation Law of the state of Maryland for the purpose of engaging in the business of investing in and owning interests in real estate. The Company operates and intends to continue to operate in a manner to qualify as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes and elected to be taxed as a REIT in connection with the filing of its 2004 federal income tax return. The Company is structured as an umbrella partnership REIT under which substantially all of the Company’s current and future business is and will be conducted through a majority-owned subsidiary, Hines REIT Properties, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”). Hines REIT is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. Subject to certain restrictions and limitations, the business of the Company is managed by Hines Advisors Limited Partnership (the “Advisor”), an affiliate of Hines Interests Limited Partnership (“Hines”), pursuant to the advisory agreement the Company entered into with the Advisor (the “Advisory Agreement”).

Public Offering

On June 18, 2004, Hines REIT commenced its initial public offering, pursuant to which it offered a maximum of 220 million common shares for sale to the public (the “Initial Offering”). The Initial Offering expired on June 18, 2006. On June 19, 2006, the Company commenced its current public offering (the “Current Offering”), pursuant to which it is offering a maximum of $2.2 billion in common shares.

The following table summarizes the activity from our offerings through December 31, 2004 and for each of the years ended December 31, 2005 through 2007 (in millions):

	Initial Public Offering						Current Public Offering						All Offerings
Year Ended	# of Shares			Proceeds			# of Shares			Proceeds			# of Shares		Proceeds
December 31, 2004		2.1		$	20.6			—		$	—			2.1	$	20.6
December 31, 2005		21.0	(1)		207.7	(1)		—			—			21.0		207.7
December 31, 2006		30.1	(2)		299.2	(2)		27.3	(2)		282.7	(2)		57.4		581.9
December 31, 2007		—			—			80.3	(3)		834.8	(3)		80.3		834.8
Total		53.2		$	527.5			107.6		$	1,117.5			160.8	$	1,645.0

(1)	Amounts include $2.1 million of gross proceeds relating to approximately 223,000 shares issued under our dividend reinvestment plan.
(2)	Amounts include $13.5 million of gross proceeds relating to 1.4 million shares issued under our dividend reinvestment plan.
(3)	Amounts include $37.4 million of gross proceeds relating to 3.8 million shares issued under our dividend reinvestment plan.

As of December 31, 2007, $929.3 million in common shares remained available for sale pursuant to our Current Offering, exclusive of $153.2 million in common shares available under our dividend reinvestment plan.

Hines REIT contributes all net proceeds from its public offerings to the Operating Partnership in exchange for partnership units in the Operating Partnership. As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, Hines REIT owned a 97.6% and 97.4%, respectively, general partner interest in the Operating Partnership.

From January 1 through March 14, 2008, Hines REIT received gross offering proceeds of $103.6 million from the sale of 9.9 million common shares, including $13.6 million relating to 1.4 million shares sold under Hines REIT’s dividend reinvestment plan. As of March 14, 2008, 839.4 million common shares remained

76

HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

available for sale to the public pursuant to the Offering, exclusive of 139.6 million common shares available under the dividend reinvestment plan.

Minority Interests

Hines 2005 VS I LP, an affiliate of Hines, owned a 0.7% and 1.3% interest in the Operating Partnership as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. As a result of HALP Associates Limited Partnership’s (“HALP”) ownership of the Participation Interest (see Note 6), HALP’s percentage ownership in the Operating Partnership was 1.7% and 1.3% as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

Investment Property

As of December 31, 2007, the Company owned interests in 39 office properties located throughout the United States, one mixed-use office and retail complex in Toronto, Ontario and one industrial property in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The Company’s interests in 24 of these properties are owned indirectly through the Company’s investment in the Core Fund (as defined in Note 3). As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company owned an approximate 32.0% and 34.0% non-managing general partner interest in the Core Fund, respectively. See further discussion in Note 3.

On February 29, 2008, the Company acquired a direct investment in an office property located in Kansas City, Missouri and on March 13, 2008, the Company acquired a direct investment in an office complex located in El Segundo, California (see Note 10).

2.   Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and contingencies as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. The Company evaluates its assumptions and estimates on an ongoing basis. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that the Company believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Additionally, application of the Company’s accounting policies involves exercising judgments regarding assumptions as to future uncertainties. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements of the Company included in this annual report include the accounts of Hines REIT, the Operating Partnership (over which Hines REIT exercises financial and operating control) and the Operating Partnership’s wholly-owned subsidiaries (see Note 3), as well as the related amounts of minority interest. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The Company evaluates the need to consolidate joint ventures based on standards set forth in the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 46R (“FIN 46R”),Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,and American Institute of Certified Public Accountants’ Statement of Position78-9(“SOP 78-9”),Accounting for Investments in Real Estate Ventures, as amended by Emerging Issues Task ForceNo. 04-5,Investor’s Accounting for an Investment in a Limited Partnership When the Investor Is the Sole General Partner and the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights.In accordance with this accounting literature, the Company will consolidate joint ventures that are determined to be variable interest entities for which it is the primary beneficiary. The Company will also consolidate joint ventures that are not determined to be variable interest entities, but for which it exercises significant control over major operating decisions through

77

HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

substantive participation rights, such as approval of budgets, selection of property managers, asset management, investment activity and changes in financing.

On June 28, 2007, the Company invested $28.9 million into HCB II River, LLC, a joint venture it created with HCB Interests II LP (“HCB”). On July 2, 2007, the joint venture acquired Distribution Park Rio, an industrial property located in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil for $103.7 million Brazilian real ($53.7 million USD as of July 2, 2007). The Company owns a 50% interest in Distribution Park Rio as a result of its investment in the joint venture. The Company concluded that the joint venture does not meet the definition of a variable interest entity under FIN 46R. Further, as neither the Company nor HCB has a controlling interest in the joint venture or any special or disproportionate voting or participation rights, consolidation is not required underSOP 78-9. Therefore, the Company accounts for its interest in the joint venture as an equity method investment. See Note 3 for additional details regarding the joint venture.

Reportable Segments

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 131,Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, establishes standards for reporting financial and descriptive information about an enterprise’s reportable segments. As described above, the Company owned interests in 40 office properties and one industrial property as of December 31, 2007. The Company’s investments in real estate are geographically diversified and management evaluates operating performance on an individual property level. The Company has determined it has two reportable segments: one with activities related to investing in office properties and one with activities related to investing in industrial properties. The Company’s office properties have similar economic characteristics, tenants, and products and services. As such, all of the Company’s 40 office properties have been aggregated into one reportable segment for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005.

The Company accounts for its ownership interest in HCB II River, LLC using the equity method of accounting for investments. As such, the activities of the industrial property are reflected in investments in unconsolidated entities in the consolidated balance sheet and equity in losses of unconsolidated entities in the consolidated statement of operations. See “Investments in Unconsolidated Entities” in Note 3 for additional discussion.

The Company’s investments in office properties generate rental revenue and other income through the leasing of office properties, which constituted 100% of the Company’s total consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Comprehensive Loss

The Company reports comprehensive loss in its consolidated statements of shareholders’ equity. Comprehensive loss was $75.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 resulting from the Company’s net loss of $87.6 million offset by its foreign currency translation adjustment of $12.5 million. See “International Operations” below for additional information.

International Operations

The Canadian dollar is the functional currency for the Company’s subsidiaries operating in Toronto, Ontario and the Brazilian real is the functional currency for the Company’s subsidiary operating in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The Company’s foreign subsidiaries have translated their financial statements into U.S. dollars for reporting purposes. Assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate in effect as of the balance sheet date. The Company translates income statement accounts using the average exchange rate for the period and significant nonrecurring transactions using the rate on the transaction date. As described above, these

78

HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

translation gains or losses are included in accumulated other comprehensive income as a separate component of shareholders’ equity.

The Company’s international subsidiaries may have transactions denominated in currencies other than their functional currency. In these instances, assets and liabilities are remeasured into the functional currency at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the period, and income statement accounts are remeasured at the average exchange rate for the period. These gains or losses are included in the Company’s results of operations.

The Company’s subsidiaries also record gains or losses in the income statement when a transaction with a third party, denominated in a currency other than the entity’s functional currency, is settled and the functional currency cash flows realized are more or less than expected based upon the exchange rate in effect when the transaction was initiated.

Investment Property

Real estate assets the Company owns directly are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation, which in the opinion of management, does not exceed the individual property’s fair value. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method. The estimated useful lives for computing depreciation are generally 10 years for furniture and fixtures,15-20 years for electrical and mechanical installations and 40 years for buildings. Major replacements that extend the useful life of the assets are capitalized. Maintenance and repair costs are expensed as incurred.

Real estate assets are reviewed for impairment if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the individual property may not be recoverable. In such an event, a comparison will be made of the current and projected operating cash flows of each property on an undiscounted basis to the carrying amount of such property. Such carrying amount would be adjusted, if necessary, to estimated fair values to reflect impairment in the value of the asset. At December 31, 2007, management believes no such impairment has occurred.

Acquisitions of properties are accounted for utilizing the purchase method and, accordingly, the results of operations of acquired properties are included in the Company’s results of operations from their respective dates of acquisition. Estimates of future cash flows and other valuation techniques that the Company believes are similar to those used by independent appraisers are used to allocate the purchase price of acquired property between land, buildings and improvements, equipment and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities such as amounts related to in-place leases, acquired above- and below-market leases, tenant relationships, asset retirement obligations and mortgage notes payable. Initial valuations are subject to change until such information is finalized no later than 12 months from the acquisition date.

The estimated fair value of acquired in-place leases are the costs the Company would have incurred to lease the properties to the occupancy level of the properties at the date of acquisition. Such estimates include the fair value of leasing commissions, legal costs and other direct costs that would be incurred to lease the properties to such occupancy levels. Additionally, the Company evaluates the time period over which such occupancy levels would be achieved and includes an estimate of the net market-based rental revenues and net operating costs (primarily consisting of real estate taxes, insurance and utilities) that would be incurred during thelease-up period. Acquired in-place leases as of the date of acquisition are amortized over the remaining lease terms.

Acquired above-and below-market lease values are recorded based on the present value (using an interest rate that reflects the risks associated with the lease acquired) of the difference between the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and management’s estimate of fair market value lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured. The capitalized above- and below-market lease values are amortized as adjustments to rental revenue over the remaining terms of the respective leases. Should a tenant terminate

79

HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

its lease, the unamortized portion of the in-place lease value is charged to amortization expense and the unamortized portion of out-of-market lease value is charged to rental revenue.

Acquired above- and below-market ground lease values are recorded based on the difference between the present values (using an interest rate that reflects the risks associated with the lease acquired) of the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the ground leases and management’s estimate of fair market value of land under the ground leases. The capitalized above- and below-market lease values are amortized as adjustments to ground lease expense over the lease term.

Management estimates the fair value of assumed mortgage notes payable based upon indications of current market pricing for similar types of debt with similar maturities. Assumed mortgage notes payable are initially recorded at their estimated fair value as of the assumption date, and the difference between such estimated fair value and the note’s outstanding principal balance is amortized over the life of the mortgage note payable.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to cash with an original maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.

Restricted Cash

As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company had restricted cash of $3.5 million and $2.5 million, respectively, related to certain escrows required by one or more of the Company’s mortgage agreements.

Deferred Leasing Costs

Direct leasing costs, primarily consisting of third-party leasing commissions and tenant inducements, are capitalized and amortized over the life of the related lease. Tenant inducement amortization is recorded as an offset to rental revenue and the amortization of other direct leasing costs is recorded in amortization expense.

The Company commences revenue recognition on its leases based on a number of factors. In most cases, revenue recognition under a lease begins when the lessee takes possession of or controls the physical use of the leased asset. Generally, this occurs on the lease commencement date. The determination of who is the owner of the tenant improvements for accounting purposes, determines the nature of the leased asset and when revenue recognition under a lease begins. If the Company is the owner of the tenant improvements for accounting purposes, then the leased asset is the finished space and revenue recognition begins when the lessee takes possession of the finished space, typically when the improvements are substantially complete. If the Company concludes the lessee is the owner of the tenant improvements for accounting purposes, then the leased asset is the unimproved space and any tenant improvement allowances funded under the lease are treated as lease incentives which reduce revenue recognized over the term of the lease. In these circumstances, the Company begins revenue recognition when the lessee takes possession of the unimproved space to construct their own improvements. The Company considers a number of different factors to evaluate whether it or the lessee is the owner of the tenant improvements for accounting purposes. These factors include: 1) whether the lease stipulates how and on what a tenant improvement allowance may be spent; 2) whether the tenant or landlord retains legal title to the improvements; 3) the uniqueness of the improvements; 4) the expected economic life of the tenant improvements relative to the length of the lease; and 5) who constructs or directs the construction of the improvements.

The determination of who owns the tenant improvements for accounting purposes is subject to significant judgment. In making that determination, the Company considers all of the above factors. No one factor, however, necessarily establishes our determination.

80

HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Tenant inducement amortization was approximately $2.0 million and $685,000 for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and was recorded as an offset to rental revenue. In addition, the Company recorded approximately $709,000 and $137,000 as amortization expense related to other direct leasing costs for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

On December 8, 2006, Norwegian Cruise Line (NCL) signed a lease renewal for its space in Airport Corporate Center, an office property located in Miami, Florida. In connection with this renewal, the Company committed to funding $10.4 million of construction costs related to NCL’s expansion and refurbishment of its space, to be paid in future periods. No such costs were paid prior to December 31, 2007, therefore the entire amount was recorded in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the accompanying balance sheets as of December 31, 2007.

Derivative Instruments

During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company entered into several forward interest rate swap transactions with HSH Nordbank AG, New York Branch (“HSH Nordbank”). These swap transactions were entered into as economic hedges against the variability of future interest rates on the Company’s variable interest rate borrowings with HSH Nordbank. The Company has not designated any of these contracts as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes.

The interest rate swaps have been recorded at their estimated fair value in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2007 and 2006. The loss resulting from the decrease in the fair value of the interest rate swaps for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 of $25.5 million and $5.3 million, respectively (including fees of approximately $731,000 and $862,000 incurred upon entering into these swap transactions, respectively), has been recorded in loss on derivative instruments, net in the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006. The Company will mark the interest rate swap contracts to their estimated fair value as of each balance sheet date, and the changes in fair value will be reflected in the consolidated statements of operations.

The table below provides additional information regarding each of the Company’s outstanding interest rate swaps as of December 31, 2007:

Effective Date	Expiration Date	Notional Amount		Interest Rate
		(In thousands)
August 1, 2006	August 1, 2016	$	185,000		5.8575	%
January 12, 2007	January 12, 2017		98,000		5.2505	%
May 2, 2007	May 2, 2017		119,000		5.3550	%
July 19, 2007	July 19, 2017		48,000		5.9800	%
August 14, 2007	August 14, 2017		70,000		6.0300	%

In addition to the interest rate contracts described above, the Company entered into a foreign currency contract in February 2007 related to its acquisition of a property in Toronto, Ontario. The contract was entered into as an economic hedge against the variability of the foreign currency exchange rate related to the Company’s equity investment and was settled at the close of this acquisition. As a result of this transaction, the Company recorded a gain of approximately $939,000, net of fees incurred upon entering into the swap transaction, in loss on derivative instruments in its consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Deferred Financing Costs

Deferred financing costs as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 consist of direct costs incurred in obtaining debt financing (see Note 4). These costs are being amortized into interest expense on a straight-line basis,

81

HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

which approximates the effective interest method, over the terms of the obligations. For the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, approximately $1.2 million and $967,000, respectively, of deferred financing costs were amortized and recorded in interest expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Other Assets

Other assets includes the following as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 (in thousands):

	December 31,		December 31,
	2007		2006
Property acquisition escrow deposit	$	10,000	$	8,858
Prepaid insurance		1,056		353
Mortgage loan deposits		904		924
Other		910		584
Total	$	12,870	$	10,719

Organizational and Offering Costs

Initial Offering

Certain organizational and offering costs associated with the Initial Offering were paid by the Advisor on behalf of the Company. Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement among Hines REIT, the Operating Partnership and the Advisor during the Initial Offering, the Company was obligated to reimburse the Advisor in an amount equal to the lesser of actual organizational and offering costs incurred related to the Initial Offering or 3.0% of the gross proceeds raised from the Initial Offering.

As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Advisor had incurred on behalf of the Company organizational and offering costs related to the Initial Offering of $43.3 million and $36.8 million, respectively (of which $23.0 million and $20.4 million as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, relates to the Advisor or its affiliates). These amounts include $24.2 million and $21.3 million as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, of organizational and internal offering costs, and $19.1 million and $15.5 million as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, of third-party offering costs, such as legal and accounting fees and printing costs. The initial offering was terminated in June 2006.

As described above, the Company’s obligation to reimburse the Advisor for organizational and offering costs related to the Initial Offering was limited by the amount of gross proceeds raised from the sale of the Company’s common shares in the Initial Offering. Amounts of organizational and offering costs recorded in the Company’s financial statements in periods ending on or before June 30, 2006 were based on estimates of gross proceeds to be raised through the end of the Initial Offering period. Such estimates were based on highly subjective factors including the number of retail broker-dealers signing selling agreements with the Company’s Dealer Manager, Hines Real Estate Securities, Inc. (“HRES” or the “Dealer Manager”), anticipated market share penetration in the retail broker-dealer network and the Dealer Manager’s best estimate of the growth rate in sales. Based on actual gross Offering proceeds raised through December 31, 2005 and management’s then-current estimate of future sales of the Company’s common shares through the end of the Initial Offering, management determined that the Company would not be obligated to reimburse the Advisor for approximately $13.7 million of organizational and offering costs, which were recorded by the Company prior to March 31, 2005. Such accruals were reversed in the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2005 and as a result, the Company reversed organizational and offering expenses of approximately $8.4 million in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations and a reduction of other offering costs, net of

82

HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

approximately $5.3 million in the accompanying consolidated statement of shareholders’ equity for the year then ended.

Based on actual gross proceeds raised in the Initial Offering, the total amount of organizational and offering costs the Company was obligated to reimburse the Advisor related to the Initial Offering is $16.0 million. As a result of amounts recorded in prior periods, during the year ended December 31, 2006, organizational and internal offering costs related to the Initial Offering totaling $1.0 million incurred by the Advisor were expensed and included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and third-party offering costs related to the Initial Offering of $2.0 million were offset against additional paid-in capital in the accompanying consolidated statement of shareholders’ equity. During the year ended December 31, 2006, organizational and internal offering costs related to the Initial Offering totaling $1.9 million and third-party offering costs related to the Initial Offering totaling $1.5 million were incurred by the Advisor but were not recorded in the consolidated financial statements because the Company was not obligated to reimburse the Advisor for these costs.

For the year ended December 31, 2005, organizational and internal offering costs related to the Initial Offering of $1.5 million were expensed and included in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations, and third-party offering costs of $1.1 million were offset against additional paid-in capital on the accompanying consolidated statement of shareholders’ equity. For the year ended December 31, 2005, organizational and offering costs related to the Initial Offering totaling $10.2 million incurred by the Advisor (including $5.0 million of organizational and internal offering costs and $5.2 million of third-party offering costs) were not recorded in the accompanying consolidated financial statements because management determined that the Company would not be obligated to reimburse the Advisor for these costs.

Current Offering

The Company commenced the Current Offering on June 19, 2006. Certain organizational and offering costs associated with the Current Offering have been paid by the Advisor on the Company’s behalf. Pursuant to the terms of the Advisory Agreement, the Company is obligated to reimburse the Advisor in an amount equal to the amount of actual organizational and offering costs incurred, so long as such costs, together with selling commissions and dealer-manager fees, do not exceed 15% of gross proceeds from the Current Offering. As of December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, the Advisor had incurred on the Company’s behalf organizational and offering costs in connection with the Current Offering of $29.1 million, $12.6 million and $1.5 million, respectively (of which approximately $12.1 million, $4.7 million and $256,000, respectively relates to the Advisor or its affiliates). These amounts include approximately $7.6 million, $4.7 million and $256,000 of internal offering costs, which have been expensed in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. In addition, $9.0 million and $7.6 million of third-party offering costs for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, have been offset against net proceeds of the Current Offering within additional paid-in capital.

Third Offering

Our Current Offering will terminate on June 19, 2008, pursuant to the terms of the offering. Accordingly, the Company expects to commence a follow-on offering on or about June 20, 2008 (the “Third Offering”). During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Advisor incurred approximately $394,000 of organizational and offering costs related to the Third Offering. Pursuant to the anticipated terms of the Third Offering, the Company is not expected to be obligated to reimburse the Advisor for these costs. Additionally, the Advisor is not a shareholder of the Company. Accordingly, no amounts have been recorded in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

83

HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes rental revenue on a straight-line basis over the life of the lease including rent holidays, if any. Straight-line rent receivable in the amount of $12.7 million and $3.4 million as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, consisted of the difference between the tenants’ rents calculated on a straight-line basis from the date of acquisition or lease commencement over the remaining terms of the related leases and the tenants’ actual rents due under the lease agreements and is included in tenant and other receivables in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Revenues associated with tenant reimbursements are recognized in the period in which the expenses are incurred based upon the tenant lease provision. Revenues relating to lease termination fees are recognized at the time that a tenant’s right to occupy the space is terminated and when the Company has satisfied all obligations under the agreement and are included in other revenue in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Stock-based Compensation

Under the terms of the Employee and Director Incentive Share Plan, the Company grants each independent member of its board of directors 1,000 restricted shares of common stock annually. The restricted shares granted each year fully vest upon completion of each director’s annual term. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (as amended) (“SFAS No. 123R”), the Company recognizes the expense related to these shares over the vesting period. During each of the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, the Company granted 3,000 restricted shares of common stock to its independent board members. For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, the Company amortized approximately $28,000, $31,000 and $40,000 of related compensation expense, respectively. Such amounts are included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Income Taxes

Hines REIT made an election to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), beginning with its taxable year ended December 31, 2004. In addition, as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 the Company owned an investment in the Core Fund, which has invested in properties through other entities that have elected to be taxed as REITs. Hines REIT’s management believes that the Company and the applicable entities in the Core Fund are organized and operate in such a manner as to qualify for treatment as REITs and intend to operate in the foreseeable future in such a manner so that they will remain qualified as REITs for federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, no provision has been made for U.S. federal income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

During 2006, the State of Texas enacted new tax legislation that restructures the state business tax in Texas by replacing the taxable capital and earned surplus components of the then-current franchise tax with a new “margin tax,” which for financial reporting purposes is considered an income tax under SFAS No. 109,Accounting for Income Taxes.This legislation had an immaterial impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Due to the acquisition of Atrium on Bay, a mixed use office and retail complex located in Toronto, Ontario, the Company has recorded a provision for Canadian income taxes of $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 in accordance with Canadian tax laws and regulations.

In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”),Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the recognition and measurement of a tax position taken in a tax return. FIN 48 requires that a determination be made as to

84

HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

whether it is more likely than not that a tax position taken, based on the technical merits, will be sustained upon examination. If the more likely than not threshold is met, the related tax position must be measured to determine the amount of provision or benefit, if any, to recognize in the financial statements. The Company or its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various states, Canada and Brazil. Tax years 2004 through 2006 remain subject to potential examination by certain federal and state taxing authorities. No income tax examinations are currently in process. The Company has reviewed our current tax positions and believe our positions will be sustained on examination. The adoption of the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007 did not have a material impact on our financial statements. The Company classifies interest and penalties related to underpayment of income taxes as income tax expense.

As of December 31, 2007, the Company had no significant temporary differences, tax credits, or net operating loss carry-forwards.

Per Share Data

Loss per common share is calculated by dividing the net loss for each period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during such period. Loss per common share on a basic and diluted basis are the same because the Company has no potential dilutive common shares outstanding.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Disclosure about the fair value of financial instruments is based on pertinent information available to management as of December 31, 2007 and 2006. Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop estimated fair values. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could obtain on disposition of the financial instruments. The use of different market assumptionsand/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, management estimated that the carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, distributions receivable, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses and distributions payable were recorded at amounts which reasonably approximated fair value. The primary factor in determining the fair value of the financial statement items listed above was the short-term nature of the items.

As of December 31, 2006, management estimated the carrying value of notes payable of $481.2 million approximated fair value due to the fact that most of the outstanding notes payable contained variable interest rates based on LIBOR. As of December 31, 2007, management estimated that the fair value of notes payable, which had a carrying value of $1,216.6 million, was $1,212.4 million. The fair value of notes payable was determined based upon interest rates available for the issuance of debt with similar securities.

Asset Retirement Obligations

In March 2005, the FASB issued FIN No. 47,Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations — an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143, which clarifies the term “conditional asset retirement obligation” as used in SFAS No. 143,Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.A conditional asset retirement obligation refers to a legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity when the timingand/or method of settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be in the control of the entity. This legal obligation is absolute, despite the uncertainty regarding the timingand/or method of settlement. In addition, the fair value of a liability for the conditional asset retirement obligation should be recognized when incurred, generally upon acquisition, construction, or developmentand/or through normal operation of the asset. FIN No. 47 also clarifies when an entity would have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation. Pursuant to FIN No. 47, the Company has determined that it meets the

85

HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

criteria for recording a liability and has recorded an asset retirement obligation aggregating approximately $327,000 as of December 31, 2007, which is included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The statement does not require new fair value measurements, but is applied to the extent other accounting pronouncements require or permit fair value measurements. The statement emphasizes fair value as a market-based measurement which should be determined based on assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. The Company will be required to disclose the methodology used to determine fair value, the extent to which fair value is used to measure assets and liabilities, the inputs used to develop the measurements, and the effect of certain of the measurements on earnings (or changes in net assets) for the period. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. In February 2008, the FASB deferred the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all nonfinancial assets and liabilities except for those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. The Company has adopted this standard effective January 1, 2008 and does not expect it to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159,The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities(“SFAS No. 159”). SFAS No. 159 expands opportunities to use fair value measurement in financial reporting and permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. This Statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We have adopted this standard effective January 1, 2008 and have elected not to measure any of our current eligible financial assets or liabilities at fair value upon adoption; however, we do reserve the right to elect to measure future eligible financial assets or liabilities at fair value.

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141 (Revised 2007),Business Combinations(“SFAS No. 141R”). SFAS No. 141R will significantly change the accounting for business combinations. Under SFAS No. 141R, an acquiring entity will be required to recognize all the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition-date fair value with limited exceptions. SFAS No. 141R will change the accounting treatment for certain specific acquisition-related items including: (1) expensing acquisition related costs as incurred; (2) valuing noncontrolling interests at fair value at the acquisition date; and (3) expensing restructuring costs associated with an acquired business. SFAS No. 141R also includes a substantial number of new disclosure requirements. SFAS No. 141R is to be applied prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after January 1, 2009. Management expects SFAS No. 141R could have a material impact if it is determined that real estate acquisitions fall under the definition of business combinations.

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 160,Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements(“SFAS No. 160”). SFAS No. 160 establishes requirements for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the Company (sometimes called “minority interests”) be clearly identified, presented, and disclosed in the consolidated statement of financial position within equity, but separate from the parent’s equity. All changes in the parent’s ownership interests are required to be accounted for consistently as equity transactions and any noncontrolling equity investments in deconsolidated subsidiaries must be measured initially at fair value. SFAS No. 160 is effective, on a prospective basis, for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. However, presentation and disclosure requirements must be retrospectively applied to comparative financial statements. Management is currently assessing the impact of SFAS No. 160 on the Company’s consolidated statement of operations.

86

HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

3.   Real Estate Investments

The following table provides summary information regarding the properties in which the Company owned interests as of December 31, 2007. All assets which are 100% owned by the Company are referred to as “directly-owned properties”. All other properties are owned indirectly through the Company’s investments in Hines U.S. Core Office Fund, L.P. (the “Core Fund”) and HCB II River LLC as discussed below.

Direct Investments

		Leasable			Percent			Our Effective
Property	City	Square Feet			Leased			Ownership(1)
		(Unaudited)
321 North Clark	Chicago, Illinois		885,664			99	%		100	%
Citymark	Dallas, Texas		220,079			100	%		100	%
JPMorgan Chase Tower	Dallas, Texas		1,242,590			91	%		100	%
Watergate Tower IV	Emeryville, California		344,433			100	%		100	%
One Wilshire	Los Angeles, California		661,553			99	%		100	%
3 Huntington Quadrangle	Melville, New York		407,731			87	%		100	%
Airport Corporate Center	Miami, Florida		1,021,397			90	%		100	%
Minneapolis Office/Flex Portfolio	Minneapolis, Minnesota		766,240			85	%		100	%
3400 Data Drive	Rancho Cordova, California		149,703			100	%		100	%
Daytona Buildings	Redmond, Washington		251,313			93	%		100	%
Laguna Buildings	Redmond, Washington		464,701			100	%		100	%
1515 S Street	Sacramento, California		348,881			100	%		100	%
1900 and 2000 Alameda	San Mateo, California		253,377			96	%		100	%
Seattle Design Center	Seattle, Washington		390,684			84	%		100	%
5th and Bell	Seattle, Washington		197,135			98	%		100	%
Atrium on Bay	Toronto, Ontario		1,070,287			95	%		100	%
Total for Directly-Owned Properties			8,675,768			94	%
Indirect Investments
Core Fund Investment
One Atlantic Center	Atlanta, Georgia		1,100,312			84	%		27.47	%
The Carillon Building	Charlotte, North Carolina		470,726			100	%		27.47	%
Charlotte Plaza	Charlotte, North Carolina		625,026			97	%		27.47	%
Three First National Plaza	Chicago, Illinois		1,419,978			94	%		21.97	%
333 West Wacker	Chicago, Illinois		845,194			87	%		21.92	%
One Shell Plaza	Houston, Texas		1,228,160			98	%		13.73	%
Two Shell Plaza	Houston, Texas		566,982			95	%		13.73	%
425 Lexington Avenue	New York, New York		700,034			100	%		12.98	%
499 Park Avenue	New York, New York		288,722			100	%		12.98	%
600 Lexington Avenue	New York, New York		283,311			95	%		12.98	%
Renaissance Square	Phoenix, Arizona		965,508			95	%		27.47	%
Riverfront Plaza	Richmond, Virginia		949,791			100	%		27.47	%
Johnson Ranch Corporate Center	Roseville, California		179,990			76	%		21.92	%
Roseville Corporate Center	Roseville, California		111,418			94	%		21.92	%
Summit at Douglas Ridge	Roseville, California		185,128			85	%		21.92	%
Olympus Corporate Center	Roseville, California		191,494			59	%		21.92	%
Douglas Corporate Center	Roseville, California		214,606			85	%		21.92	%
Wells Fargo Center	Sacramento, California		502,365			93	%		21.92	%
525 B Street	San Diego, California		447,159			90	%		27.47	%
The KPMG Building	San Francisco, California		379,328			100	%		27.47	%
101 Second Street	San Francisco, California		388,370			100	%		27.47	%
720 Olive Way	Seattle, Washington		300,710			93	%		21.92	%
1200 19th Street	Washington, D.C.		328,154	(2)		28	%		12.98	%
Warner Center	Woodland Hills, California		808,274			97	%		21.92	%
Total for Core Fund Properties			13,480,740			92	%
Other
Distribution Park Rio	Rio de Janeiro, Brazil		693,115			100	%		50	%
Total for All Properties			22,849,623			93	%

87

HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(1)

This percentage shows the effective ownership of the Operating Partnership in the properties listed. On December 31, 2007, Hines REIT owned a 97.6% interest in the Operating Partnership as its sole general partner. Affiliates of Hines owned the remaining 2.4% interest in the Operating Partnership. Our interest in Distribution Park Rio is owned through our investment in a joint venture with a Hines affiliate. We own interests in all of the properties other than those identified above as being owned 100% by us and Distribution Park Rio through our interest in the Core Fund, in which we owned an approximate 32.0% non-managing general partner interest as of December 31, 2007. The Core Fund does not own 100% of these buildings; its ownership interest in its buildings ranges from 40.6% to 85.9%.

(2)

This square footage amount includes three floors which are being added to the building and are currently under construction. The construction is expected to be completed in 2009.

Direct real estate investments

Investment property consisted of the following as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 (in thousands):

	December 31, 2007		December 31, 2006
Buildings and improvements, net	$	1,449,146	$	511,961
In-place leases, net		252,966		120,765
Land		349,778		165,603
Investment property, net	$	2,051,890	$	798,329

Summarized below is certain information about the 16 office properties the Company owned directly as of December 31, 2007:

			Date Built/
City	Property	Date Acquired	Renovated(1)
			(Unaudited)
San Mateo, California	1900 and 2000 Alameda	June 2005		1983, 1996	(2)
Dallas, Texas	Citymark	August 2005		1987
Sacramento, California	1515 S Street	November 2005		1987
Miami, Florida	Airport Corporate Center	January 2006		1982-1996	(3)
Chicago, Illinois	321 North Clark	April 2006		1987
Rancho Cordova, California	3400 Data Drive	November 2006		1990
Emeryville, California	Watergate Tower IV	December 2006		2001
Redmond, Washington	Daytona Buildings	December 2006		2002
Redmond, Washington	Laguna Buildings	January 2007		1960-1999	(4)
Toronto, Ontario	Atrium on Bay	February 2007		1984
Seattle, Washington	Seattle Design Center	June 2007		1973, 1983	(5)
Seattle, Washington	5th and Bell	June 2007		2002
Melville, New York	3 Huntington Quadrangle	July 2007		1971
Los Angeles, California	One Wilshire	August 2007		1966
Minneapolis, Minnesota	Minneapolis Office/Flex Portfolio	September 2007		1986-1999	(6)
Dallas, Texas	JPMorgan Chase Tower	November 2007		1987

(1) The date shown reflects the later of the building’s construction completion date or the date of the building’s most recent renovation.

88

HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(2)	1900 Alameda was constructed in 1971 and substantially renovated in 1996; 2000 Alameda was constructed in 1983.
(3)	Airport Corporate Center consists of 11 buildings constructed between 1982 and 1996 and a 5.46-acre land development site.
(4)	The Laguna Buildings consists of six buildings constructed between 1960 and 1999.
(5)	Seattle Design Center consists of two-story office buildings constructed in 1973 and a five-story office building with an underground garage constructed in 1983.
(6)	The Minneapolis Office/Flex Portfolio consists of nine buildings constructed between 1986 and 1999.

As of December 31, 2007, accumulated depreciation and amortization of the Company’s investment property and related intangibles was as follows (in thousands):

	Buildings and			In-Place			Out-of-Market			Out-of-Market
	Improvements			Leases			Lease Assets			Lease Liabilities
Cost	$	1,481,541		$	302,530		$	52,450		$	91,455
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization		(32,395	)		(49,564	)		(8,650	)		(11,990	)
Net	$	1,449,146		$	252,966		$	43,800		$	79,465

As of December 31, 2006, accumulated depreciation and amortization of the Company’s investment property and related intangibles was as follows (in thousands):

							Acquired			Acquired
	Buildings and			In-Place			Above-Market			Below-Market
	Improvements			Leases			Leases			Leases
Cost	$	519,843		$	137,344		$	40,267		$	19,046
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization		(7,882	)		(16,579	)		(3,853	)		(3,232	)
Net	$	511,961		$	120,765		$	36,414		$	15,814

Amortization expense was $43.0 million, $15.0 million, and $2.8 million for in-place leases for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. Amortization of out-of-market leases, net, was an increase to rental revenue of $3.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. Amortization of out-of-market leases, net, was a decrease to rental revenue of approximately $263,000 and $752,000 for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. For the properties acquired during 2007, the weighted average lease life of in-place and out-of-market leases was between three and seven years.

Anticipated amortization of in-place leases, out-of-market leases, net, and out-of-market ground leases for each of the following five years ended December 31 is as follows (in thousands):

	In-Place		Out-of-Market
	Leases		Leases, Net
2008	$	54,700	$	9,266
2009		46,948		6,997
2010		38,824		6,032
2011		32,663		5,472
2012		23,475		4,506

In connection with its direct investments, the Company has entered into non-cancelable lease agreements with tenants for office and retail space. As of December 31, 2007, the approximate fixed future minimum

89

HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

rentals for each of the years ending December 31, 2008 through 2012 and thereafter were as follows (in thousands):

	Fixed Future
	Minimum Rentals
2008	$	166,725
2009		161,203
2010		141,907
2011		128,961
2012		104,840
Thereafter		327,323
Total	$	1,030,959

Pursuant to the lease agreements with certain tenants in one of its buildings, the Company receives fees for the provision of various telecommunication-related services. The fixed future minimum rentals expected to be received for such services for each of the years ended December 31, 2008 through December 31, 2012 and for the period thereafter are $2.5 million, $1.9 million, $1.6 million, $1.3 million, $683,000 and $633,000, respectively. The Company has outsourced the provision of these services to a tenant in the same building, to whom it pays fees for the provision of such services.

During the year ended December 31, 2007 no tenant leased space representing more than 10% of the total rental revenue of the Company.

Approximately 10% of the rental revenue recognized during the year ended December 31, 2006 was earned from a state government agency, whose leases representing 10% of their space expire in October 2012 and whose remaining space expires in April 2013. No other tenant leased space representing more than 10% of the total rental revenue of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Of the total rental revenue of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005, approximately:

•  40% was earned from a tenant in the insurance industry, whose leases representing 36% of their space expired in December 2005 and whose remaining space expires in May 2018;

•  14% was earned from a government agency, whose leases representing 10% of their space expire in October 2012 and whose remaining space expires in April 2013; and

•  26% was earned from one tenant in the construction industry, whose leases representing 48% of their space expire in November 2009 and whose remaining space expires in November 2010.

No other tenant leased space representing more than 10% of the total rental revenue of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005.

One of the Company’s properties is subject to a ground lease, which expires on March 31, 2032. Although the lease provides for increases in payments over the term of the lease, ground rent expense accrues on a straight-line basis. The fixed future minimum ground lease payments for each of the years ended December 31, 2008 through December 31, 2012 and for the period thereafter are approximately $405,000, $412,000, $420,000, $428,000, $438,000 and $10.3 million, respectively. Ground lease expense for the year ended December 31, 2007 was approximately $286,000.

90

HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Investment in Unconsolidated Entities

The Company owns indirect interests in real estate through its investments in the Core Fund and HCB II River LLC (see below for further detail). The carrying values of its investments in these entities as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, are as follows (in thousands):

	December 31, 2007		December 31, 2006
Investment in Hines U.S. Core Office Fund, L.P.	$	330,441	$	307,553
Investment in HCB II River LLC		30,716		—
Total investments in unconsolidated entities	$	361,157	$	307,553

The equity in earnings (losses) of the Company’s unconsolidated entities for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, was as follows (in thousands):

	Year-Ended			Year-Ended			Year-Ended
	December 31,			December 31,			December 31,
	2007			2006			2005
Equity in losses of Hines U.S. Core Office Fund, L.P.	$	(8,673	)	$	(3,291	)	$	(831	)
Equity in earnings of HCB II River LLC		385			—			—
Total equity in losses of unconsolidated entities	$	(8,288	)	$	(3,291	)	$	(831	)

Investment in Hines U.S. Core Office Fund, L.P.

The Core Fund is a partnership organized in August 2003 by Hines to invest in existing core office properties in the United States that Hines believes are desirable long-term core holdings. The Core Fund owns interests in real estate assets through certain limited liability companies and limited partnerships which have mortgage financing in place. During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company acquired additional interests in the Core Fund totaling $209.3 million. The Company acquired the interests from affiliates of Hines at the same price at which the affiliates originally acquired the interests (in the form of limited partnership interests). The Company owned an approximate 34.0% non-managing general partner interest in the Core Fund as of December 31, 2006, which owned interests in 15 office properties throughout the United States.

The Company acquired additional interests in the Core Fund totaling $58.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2007 and owned an approximate 32.0% non-managing general partner interest in the Core Fund as of December 31, 2007. The Core Fund acquired interests in nine additional properties located in Charlotte, North Carolina, Sacramento, California, Roseville, California and Phoenix, Arizona during 2007.

91

HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Consolidated condensed financial information of the Core Fund is summarized below:

Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets of the Core Fund
as of December 31, 2007 and 2006

	December 31,		December 31,
	2007		2006
	(In thousands)
ASSETS
Cash	$	112,211	$	67,557
Investment property, net		3,481,975		2,520,278
Other assets		351,577		305,027
Total Assets	$	3,945,763	$	2,892,862
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
Debt	$	2,313,895	$	1,571,290
Other liabilities		264,705		157,248
Minority interest		426,128		341,667
Partners’ capital		941,035		822,657
Total Liabilities and Partners’ Capital	$	3,945,763	$	2,892,862

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations of the Core Fund
For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005

	Year Ended			Year Ended			Year Ended
	December 31,			December 31,			December 31,
	2007			2006			2005
	(In thousands)
Revenues, other income and interest income	$	423,997		$	281,795		$	201,604
Operating expenses		(179,198	)		(128,645	)		(92,530	)
Interest expense		(104,587	)		(68,260	)		(47,272	)
Depreciation and amortization		(172,045	)		(87,731	)		(58,219	)
Income tax expense		(578	)		—			—
Loss (income) allocated to minority interest		5,924			(7,073	)		(6,660	)
Net (loss) income	$	(26,487	)	$	(9,914	)	$	(3,077	)

Of the total rental revenue of the Core Fund for the year ended December 31, 2007, approximately 10% was earned from one tenant that provides legal services, and whose lease expires on September 30, 2018. No other tenant leased space representing more than 10% of the total rental revenue for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Of the total rental revenue of the Core Fund for the year ended December 31, 2006, approximately:

•  11% was earned from two affiliated tenants in the oil and gas industry, whose leases expire on December 31, 2015; and

•  36% was earned from several tenants in the legal services industry, whose leases expire at various times during the years 2007 through 2027.

92

HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

No other tenant leased space representing more than 10% of the total rental revenue for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Of the total rental revenue of the Core Fund for the year ended December 31, 2005, approximately:

•  15% was earned from two affiliated tenants in the oil and gas industry, whose leases expire on December 31, 2015; and

•  38% was earned from several tenants in the legal services industry, whose leases expire at various times during the years 2007 through 2027.

No other tenant leased space representing more than 10% of the total rental revenue for the year ended December 31, 2005.

Investment in HCB River II LLC

As described in Note 2, the Company has a $28.9 million investment in HCB River II LLC, a joint venture it created with HCB on June 28, 2007. On July 2, 2007, the joint venture acquired Distribution Park Rio, an industrial property located in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The Property consists of four industrial buildings that were constructed in2001-2007. The buildings contain 693,115 square feet of rentable area that is 100% leased. The Company owns a 50% indirect interest in Distribution Park Rio through its investment in the joint venture.

HCB is the managing member responsible for day-to-day operations of the joint venture. However, the Company has various approval rights and must approve certain major decisions of the joint venture including, but not limited to: the direct or indirect sale of any interest in Distribution Park Rio; any financing or other indebtedness incurred by the joint venture and the creation of any lien or encumbrance on Distribution Park Rio; annual plans and budgets for the joint venture and Distribution Park Rio; and any new leases at Distribution Park Rio.

93

HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

4.   Debt Financing

The following table includes all of the Company’s outstanding notes payable as of December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 (in thousands, except interest rates). Additional information regarding general terms and conditions of each of the Company’s notes payable follows the table:

								Principal			Principal
								Outstanding at			Outstanding at
	Origination		Maturity		Interest			December 31,			December 31,
Description	Date		Date		Rate			2007			2006
SECURED MORTGAGE DEBT
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. — Airport Corporate Center		1/31/2006		3/11/2009		4.775	%	$	90,039	(4)	$	89,233
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company — 1515 S. Street		4/18/2006		5/1/2011		5.680	%		45,000	(6)		45,000
Capmark Finance, Inc. — Atrium on Bay		2/26/2007		2/26/2017		5.330	%		193,686	(3)		—
The Prudential Insurance Company of America — One Wilshire		10/25/2007		11/1/2012		5.980	%		159,500			—
HSH POOLED MORTGAGE FACILITY
HSH Nordbank — Citymark, 321 North Clark, 1900 and 2000 Alameda		8/1/2006		8/1/2016		5.8575	%(2)		185,000			185,000
HSH Nordbank — 3400 Data Drive, Watergate Tower IV		1/23/2007		1/12/2017		5.2505	%(2)		98,000			—
HSH Nordbank — Daytona and Laguna Buildings		5/2/2007		5/2/2017		5.3550	%(2)		119,000			—
HSH Nordbank — 3 Huntington Quadrangle		7/19/2007		7/19/2017		5.9800	%(2)		48,000			—
HSH Nordbank — Seattle Design Center/5th and Bell		8/14/2007		8/14/2017		6.0300	%(2)		70,000			—
MET LIFE SECURED MORTGAGE FACILITY
Met Life — JPMorgan Chase Tower/Minneapolis Office/Flex Portfolio		12/20/2007		12/20/2012		5.70	%		205,000			—
OTHER NOTES PAYABLE
KeyBank Revolving Credit Facility		9/9/2005		10/31/2009		Variable(1	)		—			162,000
Atrium Note Payable		9/1/2004		10/1/2011		7.390	%		3,406	(5)		—
								$	1,216,631		$	481,233

(1)	The weighted average interest rate on outstanding borrowings under this facility was 6.73% as of December 31, 2006.
(2)	We entered into an interest rate swap agreement which effectively fixed the interest rate of this borrowing at the specified rate.
(3)	We entered into mortgage financing in connection with our acquisition of Atrium on Bay. The mortgage agreement provided for an interest only loan with a principal amount of $190.0 million Canadian dollars as of December 31, 2007. This amount was translated to U.S. dollars at a rate of $1.0194 as of December 31, 2007.
(4)	This mortgage is an interest-only loan in the principal amount of $91.0 million, which we assumed in connection with our acquisition of Airport Corporate Center. At the time of acquisition, the fair value of this mortgage was estimated to be $88.5 million, resulting in a premium of $2.5 million. The premium is being amortized over the term of the mortgage.
(5)	Note with Citicorp Vendor Finance Ltd. related to installation of certain equipment at Atrium on Bay. This amount was translated to U.S. dollars at a rate of $1.0194 as of December 31, 2007.

94

HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(6) We entered into mortgage financing in connection with our acquisition of 1515 S. Street. The mortgage agreement provided for an interest only loan with a principal amount of $45.0 million.

Revolving Credit Facility with KeyBank National Association

The Company is party to a credit agreement with KeyBank National Association (“KeyBank”), as administrative agent for itself and various other lenders named in the credit agreement, which provides for a revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) with maximum aggregate borrowing capacity of up to $250.0 million. The Company established this facility to repay certain bridge financing incurred in connection with certain of its acquisitions and to provide a source of funds for future real estate investments and to fund its general working capital needs.

The Revolving Credit Facility has a maturity date of October 31, 2009, which is subject to extension at the election of the Company for two successive periods of one year each, subject to specified conditions. The Company may increase the amount of the facility to a maximum of $350.0 million upon written notice prior to May 8, 2008, subject to KeyBank’s ability to syndicate the additional amount. The facility allows, at the election of the Company, for borrowing at a variable rate or a LIBOR-based rate plus a spread ranging from 125 to 200 basis points based on prescribed leverage ratios.

In addition to customary covenants and events of default, the Revolving Credit Facility provides that it shall be an event of default under the agreement if the Company’s Advisor ceases to be controlled by Hines or if Hines ceases to be majority-owned and controlled, directly or indirectly, by Jeffrey C. Hines or certain members of his family. The amounts outstanding under this facility are secured by a pledge of the Operating Partnership’s equity interests in entities that directly or indirectly hold real property assets, including the Company’s interest in the Core Fund, subject to certain limitations and exceptions. The Company has entered into a subordination agreement with Hines and the Company’s Advisor, which provides that the rights of Hines and the Advisor to be reimbursed by the Company for organizational and offering and other expenses are subordinate to the Company’s obligations under the Revolving Credit Facility. The Company has complied with all covenants of the Revolving Credit Facility as of December 31, 2007.

HSH Pooled Mortgage Facility

On August 1, 2006 (as amended on January 19, 2007), certain of the Company’s subsidiaries entered into a credit agreement with HSH Nordbank AG, New York Branch (“HSH Nordbank”) providing for a secured credit facility in the maximum principal amount of $520.0 million (the “HSH Credit Facility”), subject to certain borrowing limitations. The total borrowing capacity under the HSH Credit Facility was based upon a percentage of the appraised values of the properties that we selected to serve as collateral under this facility, subject to certain debt service coverage limitations. Amounts drawn under the HSH Credit Facility bear interest at variable interest rates based on one-month LIBOR plus an applicable margin. The Company purchased interest rate protection in the form of interest rate swap agreements prior to borrowing any amounts under the HSH Credit Facility to secure it against fluctuations of LIBOR. Loans under the HSH Credit Facility may be prepaid in whole or in part, subject to the payment of certain prepayment fees and breakage costs. As of December 31, 2007, the Company had $520.0 million outstanding under the HSH Credit Facility, therefore it has no remaining borrowing capacity under this credit facility.

The Operating Partnership provides customary non-recourse carve-out guarantees under the HSH Credit Facility and limited guarantees with respect to the payment and performance of (i) certain tenant improvement and leasing commission obligations in the event the properties securing the loan fail to meet certain occupancy requirements and (ii) certain major capital repairs with respect to the properties securing the loans.

The HSH Credit Facility provides that an event of default will exist if a change in majority ownership or control occurs for the Advisor or Hines, or if the Advisor no longer provides advisory services or manages the

95

HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

day-to-day operations of Hines REIT. The HSH Credit Facility also contains other customary events of default, some with corresponding cure periods, including, without limitation, payment defaults, cross-defaults to other agreements evidencing indebtedness and bankruptcy-related defaults, and customary covenants, including limitations on the incurrence of debt and granting of liens and the maintenance of certain financial ratios. The Company has complied with all covenants of the HSH Credit Facility as of December 31, 2007.

Secured Mortgage Facility with Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

On December 20, 2007, a subsidiary of the Operating Partnership entered into a credit agreement with Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“Met Life”), which provides a secured credit facility to the borrower and certain of our subsidiaries in the maximum principal amount of $750.0 million (the “Met Life Credit Facility”), subject to certain borrowing limitations. Borrowings under the Met Life Credit Facility may be drawn at any time until December 20, 2009, subject to the approval of Met Life. Such borrowings will be in the form of interest-only loans with fixed rates of interest which will be negotiated separately for each borrowing and will have terms of five to ten years. Each loan will contain a prepayment lockout period of two years and thereafter, prepayment will be permitted subject to certain fees.

The Met Life Credit Facility also contains other customary events of default, some with corresponding cure periods, including, without limitation, payment defaults, cross-defaults to other agreements evidencing indebtedness and bankruptcy-related defaults, and customary covenants, including limitations on the incurrence of debt and granting of liens and the maintenance of minimum loan-to- value and debt service coverage ratios. The Company has complied with all covenants of the Met Life Credit Facility as of December 31, 2007.

Additional Debt Secured by Investment Property

From time to time, the Company obtains mortgage financing for its properties outside of the credit facilities described above. These mortgages contain fixed rates of interest and are secured by the property to which they relate. These mortgage agreements contain customary events of default, with corresponding grace periods, including payment defaults, cross-defaults to other agreements and bankruptcy-related defaults, and customary covenants, including limitations on liens and indebtedness and maintenance of certain financial ratios. In addition, the Company has executed customary recourse carve-out guarantees of certain obligations under its mortgage agreements and the other loan documents. The Company has complied with all covenants related to these agreements as of December 31, 2007.

The Company expects to make principal payments on its outstanding notes payable for each of the years ended December 31, 2008 through December 31, 2012 and for the period thereafter of approximately $140,000, $91.2 million, $163,000, $48.0 million, $364.5 million and $713.7 million, respectively.

5.   Distributions

The Company’s board of directors began declaring distributions in November 2004, after it commenced business operations. The Company has declared distributions monthly and aggregated and paid such distributions quarterly. The Company intends to continue this distribution policy for so long as its board of directors

96

HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

decides this policy is in the best interests of its shareholders. The Company has made the following quarterly distributions to its shareholders and minority interests for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006:

		Total
Distribution for the Quarter Ended	Date Paid	Distribution
		(In thousands)
2007
December 31, 2007	January 16, 2008	$	24,923
September 30, 2007	October 15, 2007	$	23,059
June 30, 2007	July 20, 2007	$	18,418
March 31, 2007	April 16, 2007	$	14,012
2006
December 31, 2006	January 16, 2007	$	11,281
September 30, 2006	October 13, 2006	$	9,056
June 30, 2006	July 14, 2006	$	6,405
March 31, 2006	April 13, 2006	$	4,212

6.   Related Party Transactions

Advisory Agreement

Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, the Company is required to pay the following fees and expense reimbursements:

Acquisition Fees — The Company pays an acquisition fee to the Advisor for services related to the due diligence, selection and acquisition of direct or indirect real estate investments. The acquisition fee is payable following the closing of each acquisition in an amount equal to 0.50% of (i) the purchase price of real estate investments acquired directly by the Company, including any debt attributable to such investments, or (ii) when the Company makes an investment indirectly through another entity, such investment’s pro rata share of the gross asset value of the real estate investments held by that entity. The Advisor earned cash acquisition fees totaling $6.8 million, $5.6 million and $1.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, which have been recorded as an expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. See discussion of the Participation Interest below.

Asset Management Fees — The Company pays asset management fees to the Advisor for services related to managing, operating, directing and supervising the operations and administration of the Company and its assets. The asset management fee is earned by the Advisor monthly in an amount equal to 0.0625% multiplied by the net equity capital the Company has invested in real estate investments as of the end of the applicable month. The Advisor earned cash asset management fees totaling $8.2 million, $3.2 million and $850,000 during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, which have been recorded as an expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. See discussion of the Participation Interest below.

Expense Reimbursements — In addition to reimbursement of organizational and offering costs (see Note 2), the Company reimburses the Advisor and its affiliates for certain other expenses incurred in connection with the Company’s administration and ongoing operations. During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Advisor advanced to or made payments on the Company’s behalf totaling $2.2 million. During that period, the Advisor forgave $1.7 million of amounts previously advanced to the Company to pay these expenses and the Company made repayments totaling $375,000. As of December 31, 2005 (after taking into account the Advisor’s forgiveness referred to above), the Company owed the Advisor $1.0 million for these advances.

97

HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

For the year ended December 31, 2006, the Advisor had advanced to or made payments on the Company’s behalf totaling $1.6 million and the Company made repayments totaling $2.7 million. No amounts were owed to the Advisor as of December 31, 2006 related to these advances and no such advances were received after December 31, 2006.

Reimbursement by the Advisor to the Company — The Advisor must reimburse the Company quarterly for any amounts by which operating expenses exceed, in any four consecutive fiscal quarters, the greater of (i) 2.0% of the Company’s average invested assets, which consists of the average book value of its real estate properties, both equity interests in and loans secured by real estate, before reserves for depreciation or bad debts or other similar non-cash reserves, or (ii) 25.0% of its net income (as defined by the Company’s Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation), excluding the gain on sale of any of the Company’s assets, unless Hines REIT’s independent directors determine that such excess was justified. Operating expenses generally include all expenses paid or incurred by the Company as determined by generally accepted accounting principles, except certain expenses identified in Hines REIT’s Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation. For the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, we did not exceed this limitation.

Dealer Manager Agreement

The Company has retained HRES, an affiliate of the Advisor, to serve as dealer manager for the Initial Offering and the Current Offering. The dealer manager agreement related to the Initial Offering provided that HRES would earn selling commissions equal to 6.0% of the gross proceeds from sales of common stock sold in the Company’s primary offering and 4.0% of gross proceeds from the sale of shares issued pursuant the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan, all of which was reallowed to participating broker dealers. On May 30, 2006, the Company executed a separate dealer manager agreement for the Current Offering providing that HRES earns selling commissions equal to 7.0% of the gross proceeds from sales of common stock, all of which is reallowed to participating broker dealers, and earns no selling commissions related to shares issued pursuant to the dividend reinvestment plan. Both agreements also provide that HRES earn a dealer manager fee equal to 2.2% of gross proceeds from the sales of common stock other than issuances pursuant to the dividend reinvestment plan, a portion of which may be reallowed to participating broker dealers. HRES earned selling commissions of $53.4 million, $34.7 million and $10.5 million and earned dealer manager fees of $17.5 million, $12.5 million and $4.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, which have been offset against additional paid-in capital in the accompanying consolidated statement of shareholders’ equity.

Property Management and Leasing Agreements

The Company has entered into property management and leasing agreements with Hines to manage the leasing and operations of properties in which it directly invests. As compensation for its services, Hines receives the following:

•  A property management fee equal to the lesser of 2.5% of the annual gross revenues received from the properties or the amount of property management fees recoverable from tenants of the property under the leases. The Company incurred property management fees of approximately $3.9 million, $1.5 million and $167,000 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. These amounts, net of payments, resulted in liabilities of approximately $260,000, $312,000 and $31,000 as of December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, which have been included in due to affiliates in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

•  A leasing fee of 1.5% of gross revenues payable over the term of each executed lease including any lease renewal, extension, expansion or similar event and certain construction management and re-development construction management fees, in the event Hines renders such services. The Company incurred leasing, construction management or redevelopment fees of $1.9 million during the year ended

98

HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

December 31, 2007, of which approximately $654,000 were outstanding as of the end of the year and were included in due to affiliates in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company incurred leasing, construction management or redevelopment fees of $1.2 million, all of which were paid by the end of each year. No such fees were incurred during the year ended December 31, 2005.

•  The Company generally will be required to reimburse Hines for certain operating costs incurred in providing property management and leasing services pursuant to the property management and leasing agreements. Included in this reimbursement of operating costs are the cost of personnel and overhead expenses related to such personnel who are located at the property as well as off-site personnel located in Hines’ headquarters and regional offices, to the extent the same relate to or support the performance of Hines’s duties under the agreement. However, the reimbursable cost of these off-site personnel and overhead expenses will be limited to the lesser of the amount that is recovered from the tenants under their leasesand/or a limit calculated based on the rentable square feet covered by the agreement. The Company incurred reimbursable expenses of approximately $8.9 million, $3.5 million and $405,000 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. These amounts, net of payments, resulted in liabilities of approximately $1.7 million, $498,000 and $100,000 as of December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, which have been included in due to affiliates in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Due to Affiliates

Due to affiliates includes the following (in thousands):

	December 31,		December 31,
	2007		2006
Organizational and offering costs related to the Current Offering	$	2,260	$	4,992
Dealer manager fees and selling commissions		605		885
Asset management, acquisition fees and property-level fees and reimbursements		5,319		3,077
Other		784		—
Total	$	8,968	$	8,954

As discussed in Note 6 above, the Advisor and its affiliates have advanced or paid on behalf of the Company certain expenses incurred in connection with the Company’s administration and ongoing operations. During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Advisor forgave amounts due from the Company totaling $1.7 million related to amounts previously advanced to the Company to cover certain corporate-level general and administrative expenses. This transaction is included in forgiveness of related party payable in the accompanying statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2005.

The Participation Interest

Pursuant to the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership, HALP owns a profits interest in the Operating Partnership (the “Participation Interest”). The percentage interest in the Operating Partnership attributable to the Participation Interest was 1.7%, 1.3% and 1.2% as of December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Participation Interest entitles HALP to receive distributions from the Operating Partnership based upon its percentage interest in the Operating Partnership at the time of distribution.

As the percentage interest of the participation interest is adjusted, the value attributable to such adjustment related to acquisition fees and asset management fees is charged against earnings and recorded as a liability until such time as the Participation Interest is repurchased for cash or converted into common shares

99

HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

of Hines REIT. This liability totaled $26.8 million and $11.8 million as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and is included in the participation interest liability in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The related expense of $15.0 million, $8.8 million and $2.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, is included in asset management and acquisition fees in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

7.   Changes in Assets and Liabilities

The effect of changes in asset and liability accounts on cash flows from operating activities is as follows (in thousands):

	Year Ended December 31,
	2007			2006			2005
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Increase in other assets	$	(128	)	$	(166	)	$	(198	)
Increase in tenant and other receivables		(16,953	)		(4,073	)		(1,085	)
Additions to deferred lease costs		(14,162	)		(2,274	)		(691	)
Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses		683			2,258			1,927
Increase in participation interest liability		14,970			8,779			2,613
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities		6,268			(172	)		780
Increase in due to affiliates		2,595			2,711			127
Changes in assets and liabilities	$	(6,727	)	$	7,063		$	3,473

8.   Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures

Supplemental cash flow disclosures are as follows (in thousands):

	Year Ended December 31,
	2007		2006		2005
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
Cash paid for interest	$	44,860	$	15,371	$	1,965
Supplemental Schedule of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities
Unpaid selling commissions and dealer manager fees	$	605	$	885	$	1,108
Deferred offering costs offset against additionalpaid-in-capital	$	8,950	$	9,613	$	1,141
Reversal of deferred offering costs offset against additionalpaid-in-capital	$	—	$	—	$	(5,321	)
Distributions declared and unpaid	$	24,923	$	11,281	$	3,209
Distributions receivable	$	6,890	$	5,858	$	3,598
Dividends reinvested	$	37,445	$	13,509	$	2,117
Non-cash net liabilities acquired upon acquisition of property	$	32,858	$	11,036	$	1,072
Accrual of deferred offering costs	$	—	$	—	$	1,222
Accrual of deferred financing costs	$	117	$	185	$	—
Assumption of mortgage upon acquisition of property	$	—	$	88,495	$	—
Accrued deferred leasing costs	$	9,817	$	15,062	$	1,045
Accrued additions to investment property	$	1,189	$	163	$	—

100

HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

9.   Commitments and Contingencies

The Company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. These matters are generally covered by insurance. While the resolution of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes the final outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

10.   Subsequent Events

2555 Grand

On February 29, 2008, the Company acquired 2555 Grand, a 24-story office building located in the Crown Center submarket of Kansas City, Missouri. 2555 Grand was constructed in 2003 and consists of 595,607 square feet (unaudited) of rentable area that is 100% leased (unaudited) to Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P, an international law firm, under a lease that expires in February 2024. The contract purchase price for 2555 Grand was $155.8 million, exclusive of transaction costs, financing fees and working capital reserves.

The Raytheon/DirecTV Buildings

On March 13, 2008, the Company acquired the Raytheon/DirecTV Buildings, a complex consisting of two office buildings located in the South Bay submarket of El Segundo, California. The buildings consist of 550,579 square feet (unaudited) of rentable area and are 100% (unaudited) leased to one tenant. The contract purchase price of the Raytheon/DirecTV Buildings was $120.0 million, exclusive of transaction costs, financing fees and working capital reserves.

In connection with its acquisition of the Raytheon/DirecTV Buildings, the Company assumed a $54.2 million mortgage loan with IXIS Real Estate Capital Inc. The loan bears interest at an effective fixed rate of 5.675%, matures on December 5, 2016 and is secured by the Raytheon/DirecTV Buildings. The loan documents contain customary events of default with corresponding grace periods, including, without limitation, payment defaults, cross-defaults to other agreements and bankruptcy-related defaults, and customary covenants, including limitations on the incurrence of debt and granting of liens. This loan is not recourse to Hines REIT.

One North Wacker

On February 22, 2008, the Core Fund entered into a contract to acquire a 51-story office building located in the West Loop submarket of the central business district of Chicago, Illinois (“One North Wacker”). One North Wacker consists of approximately 1.4 million square feet (unaudited) and is approximately 98% leased (unaudited). UBS, a financial institution, leases 452,049 square feet or approximately 33% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in September 2012. PriceWaterhouseCoopers, an accounting firm, leases 256,477 square feet or approximately 19% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in October 2013. Citadel, a financial institution, leases 161,488 square feet or approximately 12% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in August 2012. The contract purchase price of One North Wacker is expected to be approximately $540.0 million, exclusive of transaction costs, financing fees and working capital. There can be no assurances that this acquisition will be consummated.

Williams Tower

On March 18, 2008, we entered into a contract to acquire: Williams Tower, a 65-story office building with an adjacent parking garage located in the Galleria/West Loop submarket of Houston, Texas; a 47.8% undivided interest in a 2.8-acre park and waterwall adjacent to Williams Tower; and a 2.3-acre land parcel located across the street from Williams Tower on Post Oak Blvd. The balance of the undivided interest in the park and waterwall is owned by an affiliate of Hines.

101

HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Williams Tower was constructed in 1982 and consists of approximately 1.5 million square feet of rentable area that is approximately 91% leased. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp, a natural gas pipe line operator, leases 250,001 square feet or approximately 16% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in March 2014 and contains options to renew for three additional five-year periods. Black Box Network Services (formerly known as NextiraOne, LLC), a telecommunications infrastructure provider, leases 186,777 square feet or approximately 12% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in March 2009. The remaining lease space is leased to 48 tenants, none of which leases more than 10% of the building’s rentable area. In addition, the Company’s headquarters is located in Williams Tower and Hines and its affiliates lease space in Williams Tower. In the aggregate, Hines and its affiliates lease 9% of the building’s net rentable area.

The contract purchase price for Williams Tower is expected to be approximately $271.5 million, exclusive of transaction costs, financing fees and working capital reserves and we expect this acquisition to close on or about May 1, 2008. There can be no assurances that this acquisition will be consummated.

Shareholder Redemption

From January 1, 2008 to March 14, 2008 , in accordance with the Company’s share redemption plan, the Company redeemed approximately 789,600 common shares and made corresponding payments totaling $7.5 million to shareholders who had requested these redemptions. The shares redeemed were cancelled and will have the status of authorized, but unissued shares.

Other

From January 1, 2008 through March 14, 2008, we have received gross offering proceeds of $103.6 million from the sale of 9.9 million common shares, including $13.6 million of gross proceeds relating to 1.4 million shares sold under our dividend reinvestment plan. As of March 14, 2008, 839.4 million common shares remained available for sale to the public pursuant to the Current Offering, exclusive of 139.6 million common shares available under our dividend reinvestment plan.

From January 1, 2008 through March 20, 2008, we incurred $63.0 million of additional borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility all of which was outstanding as of March 20, 2008.

11.   Quarterly Financial data (unaudited)

The following table presents selected unaudited quarterly financial data for each quarter during the year ended December 31, 2007:

													For the
	For the Quarter Ended												Year Ended
	March 31,			June 30,			September 30,			December 31,			December 31,
	2007			2007			2007			2007			2007
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Revenues	$	30,675		$	37,279		$	49,687		$	61,935		$	179,576
Equity in losses of unconsolidated entities	$	(1,136	)	$	(757	)	$	(5,029	)	$	(1,366	)	$	(8,288	)
Net income (loss)	$	(12,451	)	$	6,156		$	(43,950	)	$	(37,395	)	$	(87,640	)
Income (loss) per common share:
Basic and diluted	$	(0.14	)	$	0.05		$	(0.31	)	$	(0.24	)	$	(0.70	)

102

HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The following table presents selected unaudited quarterly financial data for each quarter during the year ended December 31, 2006:

													For the
	For the Quarter Ended												Year Ended
	March 31,			June 30,			September 30,			December 31,			December 31,
	2006			2006			2006			2006			2006
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Revenues	$	8,394		$	16,494		$	18,667		$	20,375		$	63,930
Equity in losses of Hines U.S. Core Office Fund, L.P.	$	(101	)	$	(812	)	$	(926	)	$	(1,452	)	$	(3,291	)
Net loss	$	(4,536	)	$	(8,422	)	$	(14,511	)	$	(11,021	)	$	(38,490	)
Loss per common share:
Basic and diluted	$	(0.17	)	$	(0.21	)	$	(0.26	)	$	(0.16	)	$	(0.79	)

* * * * *

103

Item 9.   Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A.   Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

In accordance with Exchange ActRules 13a-15 and15d-15, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2007, to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our system of internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

(i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;

(ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and

(iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control system as of December 31, 2007 was based on the framework for effective internal control over financial reporting described in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on our assessment, as of December 31, 2007, our system of internal control over financial reporting was effective.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

March 27, 2008

104

Change in Control Environment

Other than those described below, no change occurred in our internal controls over financial reporting (as defined inRule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended December 31, 2007 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

During the three months ended December 31, 2007, we continued the implementation of an upgrade to our financial and accounting systems and a new enterprise-wide accounting and lease management system for Hines. We anticipate this implementation will be completed by mid-2008. This new software has affected many aspects of our accounting and financial systems and procedures and has resulted in significant changes to our internal controls. The implementation of these systems upgrades had a material impact on our internal control over financial reporting, but these upgrades were not implemented in response to an identified significant control deficiency or material weakness. We believe that these changes have improved and strengthened our overall system of internal control.

The Company’s property-level accounting has historically been performed as a decentralized function, with many of the associated accounting controls performed at each property. Management has undertaken an initiative to evaluate full or partial centralization of property accounting to identify potential opportunities for efficienciesand/or control enhancements. The process is currently in a pilot phase, with a select number of properties being converted to the centralized accounting environment. The company is taking the necessary steps to monitor and maintain appropriate internal controls during this period of change. These steps include deploying resources to mitigate internal control risks and performing additional verifications and testing to ensure data integrity.

Item 9B.   Other Information

None.

105

PART III

Item 10.   Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC no later than April 29, 2008.

Item 11.   Executive Compensation

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC no later than April 29, 2008.

Item 12.   Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC no later than April 29, 2008.

Item 13.   Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC no later than April 29, 2008.

Item 14.   Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC no later than April 29, 2008.

PART IV

Item 15.   Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a)(1)Financial Statements

Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. Consolidated Financial Statements — Three Years Ended December 31, 2007
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	71
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheets	72
Consolidated Statements of Operations	73
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity	74
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	75
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	76
Hines U.S. Core Office Fund, L.P. Consolidated Financial Statements — Three Years Ended December 31, 2007
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	107
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheets	108
Consolidated Statements of Operations	109
Consolidated Statements of Partners’ Equity	110
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	111
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	112

(2) Financial Statement Schedules

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Schedule III — Real Estate Assets and Accumulated Depreciation is set forth beginning on page 130 hereof.

All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the SEC are not required under the related instructions or are not applicable and therefore have been omitted.

(b) Exhibits

Reference is made to the Index beginning on page 132 for a list of all exhibits filed as a part of this report.

* * * * * *

106

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Partners of

Hines-Sumisei U.S. Core Office Fund, L.P.

Houston, Texas

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Hines-Sumisei U.S. Core Office Fund, L.P. and subsidiaries (the “Partnership”) as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, partners’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Partnership is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Partnership at December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/  Deloitte & Touche LLP

Houston, Texas
March 26, 2008

107

HINES-SUMISEI U.S. CORE OFFICE FUND, L.P.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

As of December 31, 2007 and 2006

	2007		2006
	(In thousands)
ASSETS
Investment property:
Buildings and improvements — net	$	2,408,597	$	1,606,064
In-place leases — net		472,963		413,021
Land		600,415		501,193
Total investment property		3,481,975		2,520,278
Cash and cash equivalents		112,211		67,557
Restricted cash		14,690		8,449
Straight-line rent receivable		61,395		43,336
Tenant and other receivables — net		14,222		6,021
Deferred financing costs — net		17,421		18,917
Deferred leasing costs — net		94,359		64,476
Acquired above-market leases — net		135,287		155,298
Acquired below-market ground leases — net		3,013		—
Prepaid expenses and other assets		11,190		8,530
TOTAL ASSETS	$	3,945,763	$	2,892,862
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	88,280	$	67,633
Due to affiliates		5,228		4,160
Straight-line rent payable		3,782		1,506
Acquired below-market leases — net		70,560		35,839
Acquired above-market ground leases — net		4,611		4,731
Other liabilities		58,934		14,487
Distributions payable		21,552		17,218
Dividends and distributions payable to minority interest holders		11,758		11,674
Notes payable — net		2,313,895		1,571,290
Total liabilities		2,578,600		1,728,538
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)
Minority interest		426,128		341,667
Partners’ equity		941,035		822,657
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ EQUITY	$	3,945,763	$	2,892,862

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

108

HINES-SUMISEI U.S. CORE OFFICE FUND, L.P.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005

	2007			2006			2005
	(In thousands)
Revenues:
Rental revenues	$	382,207		$	263,462		$	190,686
Other revenues		28,879			16,454			9,991
Total revenues		411,086			279,916			200,677
Expenses:
Depreciation and amortization		172,045			87,731			58,219
Property operating expenses		96,344			67,066			46,558
Real property taxes		63,693			49,100			37,213
Property management fees		8,981			5,839			3,912
General and administrative		10,180			6,640			4,847
Total expenses		351,243			216,376			150,749
Income before other income, interest income, interest expense, income tax expense and loss (income) allocated to minority interests		59,843			63,540			49,928
Other income		9,637			—			—
Interest income		3,274			1,879			928
Interest expense		(104,587	)		(68,260	)		(47,273	)
(Loss) income before income tax expense and loss (income) allocated to minority interest		(31,833	)		(2,841	)		3,583
Income tax expense		(578	)		—			—
Loss (income) allocated to minority interests		5,924			(7,073	)		(6,660	)
Net loss	$	(26,487	)	$	(9,914	)	$	(3,077	)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

109

HINES-SUMISEI U.S. CORE OFFICE FUND, L.P.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS’ EQUITY

For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005

	Managing
	General			Other
	Partner			Partners			Total
	(In thousands)
BALANCE — January 1, 2005	$	(1,318	)	$	261,086		$	259,768
Contributions from partners		207			199,060			199,267
Distributions to partners		(58	)		(39,824	)		(39,882	)
Net loss		(3	)		(3,074	)		(3,077	)
Adjustment for basis difference		1,479			—			1,479
BALANCE — December 31, 2005		307			417,248			417,555
Contributions from partners		456			469,984			470,440
Distributions to partners		(56	)		(55,368	)		(55,424	)
Net loss		(10	)		(9,904	)		(9,914	)
BALANCE — December 31, 2006		697			821,960			822,657
Contributions from partners		219			227,453			227,672
Distributions to partners		(83	)		(82,724	)		(82,807	)
Net loss		(27	)		(26,460	)		(26,487	)
BALANCE — December 31, 2007	$	806		$	940,229		$	941,035

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

110

HINES-SUMISEI U.S. CORE OFFICE FUND, L.P.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005

	2007			2006			2005
				(In thousands)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(26,487	)	$	(9,914	)	$	(3,077	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		182,919			95,163			64,152
Amortization of out-of-market leases — net		9,371			15,204			16,233
Minority interest in (losses) earnings of consolidated entities		(5,924	)		7,073			6,660
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Increase in tenant and other receivables		(7,217	)		(1,398	)		(2,909	)
Increase in straight-line rent receivable		(18,059	)		(16,336	)		(15,522	)
Additions to deferred leasing costs		(21,532	)		(24,931	)		(22,154	)
Increase in prepaid expenses and other assets		(928	)		(842	)		(109	)
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses		(4,785	)		8,903			16,361
Increase (decrease) in due to affiliates		255			808			(2,025	)
Increase in straight-line rent payable		2,276			1,187			192
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities		5,718			(5,038	)		(10,901	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		115,607			69,879			46,901
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Investments in investment property		(938,992	)		(1,066,558	)		(348,117	)
Investments in master lease		(900	)		—			—
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash		(6,241	)		(6,311	)		11,002
Decrease (increase) in acquired out-of-market leases		42,228			11,812			(16,092	)
Increase in other assets		—			—			(6,000	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(903,905	)		(1,061,057	)		(359,207	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Contributions from partners		227,672			470,440			180,430
Contributions from minority interest holders		143,960			113,381			23,309
Prepaid contributions from minority interest holders		36,040			—			—
Distributions to partners		(78,473	)		(52,166	)		(33,000	)
Dividends to minority interest holders		(53,491	)		(35,298	)		(30,479	)
Proceeds from notes payable		915,943			1,060,145			346,140
Repayments of notes payable		(355,635	)		(537,945	)		(170,843	)
Increase (decrease) in security deposit liabilities		75			82			(1,801	)
Additions to deferred financing costs		(3,139	)		(1,948	)		(2,002	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		832,952			1,016,691			311,754
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		44,654			25,513			(552	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS — Beginning of year		67,557			42,044			42,596
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS — End of year	$	112,211		$	67,557		$	42,044

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

111

HINES-SUMISEI U.S. CORE OFFICE FUND, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.   ORGANIZATION

Hines-Sumisei U.S. Core Office Fund, L.P. and consolidated subsidiaries (the “Fund”) was organized in August 2003 as a Delaware limited partnership by affiliates of Hines Interests Limited Partnership (“Hines”) for the purpose of investing in existing office properties (“Properties”) in the United States. The Fund’s third-party investors are primarily U.S. and foreign institutional investors. The managing general partner is Hines U.S. Core Office Capital LLC (“Capital”), an affiliate of Hines. As of December 31, 2007, the Fund owned indirect interests in office properties as follows:

		Effective
		Ownership
		by the Fund
		December 31,
Property	City	2007(1)
One Atlantic Center	Atlanta, Georgia		85.9	%
Three First National Plaza	Chicago, Illinois		68.7
333 West Wacker	Chicago, Illinois		68.6
One Shell Plaza	Houston, Texas		43.0
Two Shell Plaza	Houston, Texas		43.0
425 Lexington Avenue	New York, New York		40.6
499 Park Avenue	New York, New York		40.6
600 Lexington Avenue	New York, New York		40.6
Riverfront Plaza	Richmond, Virginia		85.9
525 B Street	San Diego, California		85.9
The KPMG Building	San Francisco, California		85.9
101 Second Street	San Francisco, California		85.9
720 Olive Way	Seattle, Washington		68.6
1200 Nineteenth Street	Washington, D.C.		40.6
Warner Center	Woodland Hills, California		68.6
Douglas Corporate Center	Sacramento, California		68.6
Johnson Ranch Corporate Centre	Sacramento, California		68.6
Roseville Corporate Center	Sacramento, California		68.6
Summit at Douglas Ridge	Sacramento, California		68.6
Olympus Corporate Centre	Sacramento, California		68.6
Wells Fargo Center	Sacramento, California		68.6
Charlotte Plaza	Charlotte, North Carolina		85.9
Carillon	Charlotte, North Carolina		85.9
Renaissance Square	Phoenix, Arizona		85.9

(1) This percentage shows the Fund’s effective ownership interests in the applicable operating companies (“Companies”) that own the Properties. The Fund holds an indirect ownership interest in the Companies through its investments in (1) Hines-Sumisei NY Core Office Trust (“NY Trust”) (40.6% at December 31, 2007) and (2) Hines-Sumisei U.S. Core Office Trust (“Core Office Trust”) (99.8% at December 31, 2007).

2.   SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation— The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Fund, as well as the accounts of entities over which the Fund exercises financial and operating control and the related

112

HINES-SUMISEI U.S. CORE OFFICE FUND, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

amounts of minority interest. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The Fund evaluates the need to consolidate joint ventures based on standards set forth in Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. (“FIN”) 46R,Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, and American Institute of Certified Public Accountants’ Statement of Position78-9,Accounting for Investments in Real Estate Ventures, as amended by Emerging Issues Task Force IssueNo. 04-5,Investor’s Accounting for an Investment in a Limited Partnership When the Investor Is the Sole General Partner and the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights. In accordance with this accounting literature, the Fund will consolidate joint ventures that are determined to be variable interest entities for which it is the primary beneficiary. The Fund will also consolidate joint ventures that are not determined to be variable interest entities, but for which it exercises significant control over major operating decisions, such as approval of budgets, selection of property managers, asset management, investment activity and changes in financing. As of December 31, 2007, the Fund has no unconsolidated interests in joint ventures.

Investment Property— Real estate assets are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation, which, in the opinion of management, does not exceed the individual property’s fair value. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method. The estimated useful lives for computing depreciation are 5 to 10 years for furniture and fixtures, 5 to 20 years for electrical and mechanical installations, and 40 years for buildings. Major replacements where the betterment extends the useful life of the assets are capitalized. Maintenance and repair items are expensed as incurred.

Real estate assets are reviewed for impairment if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the individual property may not be recoverable. In such an event, a comparison will be made of the current and projected operating cash flows of each property on an undiscounted basis to the carrying amount of such property. Such carrying amount would be adjusted, if necessary, to estimated fair values to reflect impairment in the value of the asset. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, management believes no such impairment has occurred.

Acquisitions of properties are accounted for utilizing the purchase method, and accordingly, the results of operations of acquired properties are included in the Fund’s results of operations from the respective dates of acquisition. Estimates of future cash flows and other valuation techniques similar to those used by independent appraisers are used to allocate the purchase price of acquired property between land, buildings and improvements, equipment, asset retirement obligations, assumed mortgage notes payable, and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities, such as amounts related to in-place leases, acquired above- and below-market leases, acquired above- and below-market ground leases and tenant relationships. Initial valuations are subject to change until such information is finalized no later than 12 months from the acquisition date.

The estimated fair value of acquired in-place leases are the costs the Fund would have incurred to lease the properties to the occupancy level of the properties at the date of acquisition. Such estimates include the fair value of leasing commissions, legal costs and other direct costs that would be incurred to lease the properties to such occupancy levels. Additionally, the Fund evaluates the time period over which such occupancy levels would be achieved and includes an estimate of the net operating costs (primarily consisting of real estate taxes, insurance and utilities) that would be incurred during thelease-up period. Acquired in-place leases as of the date of acquisition are amortized to amortization expense over the remaining lease terms.

Acquired above- and below-market lease values are recorded based on the present value (using an interest rate that reflects the risks associated with the lease acquired) of the difference between the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and management’s estimate of fair market value lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining terms of the leases. The capitalized above- and below-market lease values are amortized as adjustments to rent revenue over the

113

HINES-SUMISEI U.S. CORE OFFICE FUND, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

remaining terms of the respective leases. Should a tenant terminate its lease, the unamortized portion of thein-place lease value is charged to amortization expense and the unamortized portion of out-of-market lease value is charged to rental revenue.

Acquired above- and below-market ground lease values are recorded based on the difference between the present value (using an interest rate that reflects the risks associated with the lease acquired) of the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the ground leases and management’s estimate of fair market value of land under the ground leases. The capitalized above- and below-market lease values are amortized as adjustments to ground lease expense over the lease term.

Cash and Cash Equivalents —The Fund defines cash and cash equivalents as cash on hand and investment instruments with original maturities of three months or less.

Restricted Cash —At December 31, 2007 and 2006, restricted cash consists of tenant security deposits and escrow deposits held by lenders for property taxes, tenant improvements and leasing commissions. Substantially all restricted cash is invested in demand or short-term instruments.

Deferred Financing Costs —Deferred financing costs consist of direct costs incurred in obtaining the notes payable (see Note 4). These costs are being amortized into interest expense on a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective interest method, over the term of the notes. For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, $4.6 million, $4.4 million, and $4.2 million, respectively, was amortized into interest expense. Deferred financing costs are shown at cost in the consolidated balance sheets, net of accumulated amortization of $14.6 million and $10.3 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

Deferred Leasing Costs —Direct leasing costs, primarily third-party leasing commissions and tenant incentives, are capitalized and amortized over the life of the related lease. Tenant incentive amortization was $5.7 million, $2.9 million, and $1.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively, and was recorded as an offset to rental revenue. Amortization expense related to other direct leasing costs for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, was $3.3 million, $2.1 million, and $1.4 million, respectively. Deferred leasing costs are shown at cost in the consolidated balance sheets, net of accumulated amortization of $15.5 million and $8.4 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

Revenue Recognition —The Fund recognizes rental revenue on a straight-line basis over the life of the lease, including the effect of rent holidays, if any. Straight-line rent receivable included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets consists of the difference between the tenants’ rents calculated on a straight-line basis from the date of acquisition or lease commencement date over the remaining term of the related leases and the tenants’ actual rents due under the leases. Revenues relating to lease termination fees are recognized at the time a tenant’s right to occupy the space is terminated and when the Fund has satisfied all obligations under the lease agreement.

Other revenues consist primarily of parking revenue and tenant reimbursements. Parking revenue represents amounts generated from contractual and transient parking and is recognized in accordance with contractual terms or as services are rendered. Other revenues relating to tenant reimbursements are recognized in the period that the expense is incurred.

Other Income —In April 2007, the Fund received a payment of $9.6 million in consideration for conveying certain air rights under an easement agreement associated with 600 Lexington Avenue.

Income Taxes —In May 2006, the State of Texas enacted legislation that replaces the current franchise tax with a new “margin tax,” which is effective for tax reports due on or after January 1, 2008, and which will compute the tax based on business done in calendar years beginning after December 31, 2006. The new legislation expands the number of entities covered by the current Texas franchise tax and specifically includes limited partnerships as subject to the new margin tax, which for financial reporting purposes is considered an income tax under Statement of Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 109,Accounting for Income Taxes.

114

HINES-SUMISEI U.S. CORE OFFICE FUND, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Currently, the Fund owns an indirect interest in two properties located in Texas. Income tax expense was approximately $578,000 for the year ended December 31, 2007. As of December 31, 2007, the Partnership had no significant temporary differences, tax credits or net operating loss carry-forwards.

No provision for income taxes, other than described above, is made in the accounts of the Fund since such taxes are liabilities of the partners and depend upon their respective tax situations.

Use of Estimates —The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Concentration of Credit Risk —At December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Fund had cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash in excess of federally insured levels on deposit with financial institutions. Management regularly monitors the financial stability of these financial institutions and believes that the Fund is not exposed to any significant credit risk in cash or cash equivalents or restricted cash.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements —In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. FIN No. 48 requires we recognize in our financial statements the impact of a tax position, if the position is more likely than not of being sustained on audit, based on the technical merits of the position. FIN No. 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. The adoption of the provisions of FIN No. 48 on January 1, 2008, did not have a material impact on the Fund’s consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The statement does not require new fair value measurements, but is applied to the extent other accounting pronouncements require or permit fair value measurements. The statement emphasizes fair value as a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. Management will be required to disclose the extent to which fair value is used to measure assets and liabilities, the inputs used to develop the measurements, and the effect of certain of the measurements on earnings (or changes in net assets) for the period. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. In February 2008, the FASB deferred the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all nonfinancial assets and liabilities except for those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. Management does not anticipate the adoption of this statement will have a material impact on the Fund’s consolidated financial statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. SFAS No. 159 expands opportunities to use fair value measurement in financial reporting and permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. Management has adopted this standard effective January 1, 2008, and has elected not to measure any of the Fund’s current eligible financial assets or liabilities at fair value upon adoption; however, management reserves the right to elect to measure future eligible financial assets or liabilities at fair value.

In December 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (Revised 2007), “Business Combinations”. SFAS No. 141R will significantly change the accounting for business combinations. Under SFAS No. 141R, an acquiring entity will be required to recognize all the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition-date fair value with limited exceptions. SFAS No. 141R will change the accounting treatment for certain specific acquisition-related items including: (1) expensing acquisition related costs as incurred; (2) valuing noncontrolling interests at fair value at the acquisition date; and (3) expensing restructuring costs associated

115

HINES-SUMISEI U.S. CORE OFFICE FUND, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

with an acquired business. SFAS No. 141R also includes a substantial number of new disclosure requirements. SFAS No. 141R is to be applied prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after January 1, 2009. Management expects SFAS No. 141R could have a material impact if it is determined that real estate acquisitions fall under the definition of business combinations.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements”. SFAS No. 160 establishes requirements for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the Fund (sometimes called “minority interests”) be clearly identified, presented, and disclosed in the consolidated balance sheet within equity, but separate from the partner’s equity. All changes in the partner’s ownership interests are required to be accounted for consistently as equity transactions and any noncontrolling equity investments in deconsolidated subsidiaries must be measured initially at fair value. SFAS No. 160 is effective, on a prospective basis, for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. However, presentation and disclosure requirements must be retrospectively applied to comparative financial statements. Management is currently assessing the impact of SFAS No. 160 on the Fund’s consolidated statements of operations.

3.   REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS

At December 31, 2007, the Fund indirectly owned interests in properties as follows:

			Leasable
Property	City	Acquisition Date	Square Feet			% Leased
			(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
One Atlantic Center	Atlanta, Georgia	July 2006		1,100,312			84	%
Three First National Plaza	Chicago, Illinois	March 2005		1,419,978			94
333 West Wacker	Chicago, Illinois	April 2006		845,194			87
One Shell Plaza	Houston, Texas	May 2004		1,228,160			98
Two Shell Plaza	Houston, Texas	May 2004		566,982			95
425 Lexington Avenue	New York, New York	August 2003		700,034			100
499 Park Avenue	New York, New York	August 2003		288,722			100
600 Lexington Avenue	New York, New York	February 2004		283,311			95
Riverfront Plaza	Richmond, Virginia	November 2006		949,791			100
525 B Street	San Diego, California	August 2005		447,159			90
The KPMG Building	San Francisco, California	September 2004		379,328			100
101 Second Street	San Francisco, California	September 2004		388,370			100
720 Olive Way	Seattle, Washington	January 2006		300,710			93
1200 Nineteenth Street	Washington, D.C.	August 2003		328,154	(1)		28
Warner Center	Woodland Hills, California	October 2006		808,274			97
Douglas Corporate Center	Sacramento, California	May 2007		214,606			85
Johnson Ranch Corporate Centre	Sacramento, California	May 2007		179,990			76
Roseville Corporate Center	Sacramento, California	May 2007		111,418			94
Summit at Douglas Ridge	Sacramento, California	May 2007		185,128			85
Olympus Corporate Centre	Sacramento, California	May 2007		191,494			59
Wells Fargo Center	Sacramento, California	May 2007		502,365			93
Charlotte Plaza	Charlotte, North Carolina	June 2007		625,026			97
Carillon	Charlotte, North Carolina	July 2007		470,726			100
Renaissance Square	Phoenix, Arizona	December 2007		965,508			95
				13,480,740

116

HINES-SUMISEI U.S. CORE OFFICE FUND, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(1) The square footage amount includes approximately 93,000 square feet (unaudited) currently under construction (See Note 12).

As of December 31, 2007, cost and accumulated depreciation and amortization related to investments in real estate assets and related lease intangibles were as follows (in thousands):

							Acquired			Acquired		Acquired			Acquired
	Buildings and			In-Place			Above-Market			Below-Market		Below-Market			Above-Market
	Improvements			Leases			Leases			Ground Leases		Leases			Ground Leases
Cost	$	2,517,996		$	654,673		$	208,093		$	3,013	$	90,414		$	4,787
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(109,399	)		(181,710	)		(72,806	)		—		(19,854	)		(176	)
Net	$	2,408,597		$	472,963		$	135,287		$	3,013	$	70,560		$	4,611

As of December 31, 2006, cost and accumulated depreciation and amortization related to investments in real estate assets and related lease intangibles were as follows (in thousands):

							Acquired			Acquired			Acquired
	Buildings and			In-Place			Above-Market			Below-Market			Above-Market
	Improvements			Leases			Leases			Leases			Ground Leases
Cost	$	1,666,784		$	531,218		$	211,179		$	50,876		$	4,787
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(60,720	)		(118,197	)		(55,881	)		(15,037	)		(56	)
Net	$	1,606,064		$	413,021		$	155,298		$	35,839		$	4,731

Amortization expense was $89.6 million, $56.3 million, and $38.9 million for in-place leases for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. Amortization of out-of-market leases, net, was a decrease of rental revenue of $9.5 million, $15.3 million, and $16.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. Amortization of above-market ground leases was a decrease to ground lease expense of approximately $120,000 and $56,000 for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. For properties acquired in 2007, the weighted-average lease life of in-place and out-of-market leases was between two and five years.

Anticipated amortization of in-place leases, out-of-market leases, net, and out-of-market ground leases, net, for the next five years is as follows (in thousands):

					Out-of-Market
	In-Place		Out-of-Market		Ground
Years Ending December 31	Leases		Leases — Net		Leases — Net
2008	$	97,459	$	6,347	$	32
2009		80,515		7,431		32
2010		67,427		8,321		32
2011		58,662		8,162		32
2012		43,723		6,801		32

117

HINES-SUMISEI U.S. CORE OFFICE FUND, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

4.   NOTES PAYABLE

The Fund’s notes payable at December 31, 2007 and 2006, consist of the following (in thousands):

				Outstanding		Outstanding
	Interest Rate			Principal		Principal
	as of			Balance at		Balance at
	December 31,	Maturity		December 31,		December 31,
Description	2007	Date		2007		2006
MORTGAGE DEBT
SECURED NONRECOURSE FIXED RATE MORTGAGE LOANS:
Bank of America/Connecticut General Life Insurance:
425 Lexington Avenue, 499 Park Avenue, 1200 Nineteenth Street
Note A1	4.7752%		9/1/2013	$	160,000	$	160,000
Note A2	4.7752		9/1/2013		104,600		104,600
Note B	4.9754		9/1/2013		51,805		51,805
Prudential Financial, Inc. — 600 Lexington Avenue	5.74		3/1/2014		49,850		49,850
Prudential Mortgage Capital Company Note A — One Shell Plaza/Two Shell Plaza	4.64		6/1/2014		131,963		131,963
Prudential Mortgage Capital Company Note B — One Shell Plaza/Two Shell Plaza	5.29		6/1/2014		63,537		63,537
Nippon Life Insurance Companies — The KPMG Building	5.13		9/20/2014		80,000		80,000
Nippon Life Insurance Companies — 101 Second Street	5.13		4/19/2010		75,000		75,000
The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company — Three First National Plaza	4.67		4/1/2012		126,900		126,900
NLI Properties East, Inc. — 525 B Street	4.69		8/7/2012		52,000		52,000
Prudential Insurance Company of America — 720 Olive Way	5.32		2/1/2016		42,400		42,400
Prudential Insurance Company of America — 333 West Wacker	5.66		5/1/2016		124,000		124,000
Prudential Insurance Company of America — One Atlantic Center	6.10		8/1/2016		168,500		168,500
Bank of America, N.A. — Warner Center	5.628		10/2/2016		174,000		174,000
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company — Riverfront Plaza	5.20		6/1/2012		135,900		135,900

118

HINES-SUMISEI U.S. CORE OFFICE FUND, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

				Outstanding		Outstanding
	Interest Rate			Principal		Principal
	as of			Balance at		Balance at
	December 31,	Maturity		December 31,		December 31,
Description	2007	Date		2007		2006
Bank of America, N.A. — Wells Fargo Center, Roseville Corporate Center, Summit at Douglas Ridge, Olympus Corporate Centre, Johnson Ranch Corporate Centre Corporate Centre
Note A1	5.5585		5/1/2017		163,950		—
Note A2	5.5125		5/1/2014		18,650		—
Note A3	5.4545		5/1/2012		54,650		—
KeyBank National Association — Douglas Corporate Center	5.427		6/1/2014		36,000		—
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company — Charlotte Plaza	6.02		8/1/2012		97,500		—
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company — Carillon	6.02		8/1/2012		78,000		—
Bank of America, N.A. — One Renaissance Square	5.1325		3/12/2012		103,600		—
Principal Commercial Funding LLC — Two Renaissance Square	5.14		4/1/2012		85,200		—
					2,178,005		1,540,455
SECURED NONRECOURSE VARIABLE RATE MEZZANINE LOANS — The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company — Three First National Plaza	6.225 (30-day LIBOR + 1%)		4/1/2010		14,100		14,100
REVOLVING CREDIT FACILITIES
KeyBank National Association — NY Core Office Trust	5.93 (weighted avg.)		12/19/2010		31,933		18,575
KeyBank National Association — US Core Office Properties	6.14 (weighted avg.)		10/31/2009		98,200		—
Total				$	2,322,238	$	1,573,130

Substantially all the mortgage notes described above require monthly interest-only payments, and prepayment of principal balance is permitted with payment of a premium. Each mortgage note is secured by a mortgage on the related property, the leases on the related property, and the security interest in personal property located on the related property.

Revolving Credit Facilities

KeyBank National Association — NY Core Office Trust — On January 28, 2005 and as amended on July 13, 2006, Hines-Sumisei NY Core Office Trust (“NY Trust”), a subsidiary of the Fund, entered into an unsecured revolving line of credit facility (“Credit Agreement I”) with KeyBank National Association

119

HINES-SUMISEI U.S. CORE OFFICE FUND, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(“KeyBank”). The Credit Agreement I provides for borrowing capacity of up to $30.0 million. Loans under this facility bear interest, at the borrower’s option, at a variable rate or a LIBOR-based rate plus a spread ranging from 150 to 200 basis points based on a prescribed leverage ratio calculated for NY Trust. Payments of interest are due monthly, and all outstanding principal and unpaid interest are due on January 28, 2008, the maturity date of this facility. NY Trust may extend the maturity date for two successive one-year periods, subject to certain terms and conditions. NY Trust may prepay the note at any time with three business days’ notice. The Credit Agreement I was retired in conjunction with the execution of a new credit facility with KeyBank on December 19, 2007, as described below.

On December 19, 2007, NY Trust entered into an unsecured revolving line of credit facility (“Credit Agreement II”) with KeyBank, as an administrative agent for itself and certain other lenders. The Credit Agreement II provides for borrowing capacity of up to $100.0 million with an option to increase the capacity up to $150.0 million prior to June 19, 2009, subject to certain terms and conditions. Loans under this facility bear interest, at the borrower’s option, at a variable rate or a LIBOR-based rate plus a spread ranging from 100 to 137.5 basis points based on a prescribed leverage ratio calculated for NY Trust. Payments of interest are due monthly, and all outstanding principal and unpaid interest are due on December 19, 2010, the maturity date of this facility. NY Trust may extend the maturity date for two successive one-year periods, subject to certain terms and conditions. NY Trust may prepay the note at any time with three business days’ notice. Initial borrowings under Credit Agreement II were used to pay in full the outstanding balance under Credit Agreement I.

KeyBank National Association — U.S. Core Office Properties — On August 31, 2005, and as amended November 8, 2006, Hines-Sumisei U.S. Core Office Properties LP (“Core Office Properties”), a subsidiary of the Fund, entered into a revolving line of credit facility (“Credit Agreement III”) with KeyBank, as an administrative agent for itself and certain other lenders. The Credit Agreement III provides for borrowing capacity of up to $175.0 million. Loans under this facility bear interest, at the borrower’s option, at a variable rate or a LIBOR-based rate plus a spread ranging from 125 to 200 basis points based on a prescribed leverage ratio calculated for Core Office Properties, which ratio under the Credit Agreement III takes into account Core Office Properties’ effective ownership interest in the debt and certain allowable assets of entities in which Core Office Properties directly and indirectly invests. Payments of interest are due monthly, and all outstanding principal and unpaid interest are due on October 31, 2009, the maturity date of this facility . Core Office Properties may extend the maturity date for two successive one-year periods, subject to certain terms and conditions. Core Office Properties may prepay the note at any time with three business days’ notice.

As of December 31, 2007, the scheduled principal payments on notes payable are due as follows (in thousands):

Years Ending December 31
2008	$	—
2009		99,665
2010		124,072
2011		3,189
2012		737,097
Thereafter		1,358,215
		2,322,238
Unamortized discount		(8,343	)
Total	$	2,313,895

All of the notes described above contain both affirmative and negative covenants. The Fund is in compliance with such covenants at December 31, 2007.

120

HINES-SUMISEI U.S. CORE OFFICE FUND, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

5.   RENTAL REVENUES

The Fund has entered into noncancelable lease agreements, subject to various escalation clauses, with tenants for office and retail space. As of December 31, 2007, the approximate fixed future minimum rentals in various years through 2027 are as follows (in thousands):

	Fixed Future
	Minimum
Years Ending December 31	Rentals
2008	$	326,269
2009		314,501
2010		294,146
2011		276,779
2012		230,374
Thereafter		851,568
Total	$	2,293,637

Of the total rental revenue for the year ended December 31, 2007, approximately:

•  10% was earned from a tenant in the legal services industry, whose lease expires on October 31, 2018.

Of the total rental revenue for the year ended December 31, 2006, approximately:

•  14% was earned from a tenant in the legal services industry, whose lease expires on October 31, 2018, and

•  11% was earned from two affiliated tenants in the oil and gas industry, whose leases expire on December 31, 2015.

Of the total rental revenue for the year ended December 31, 2005, approximately:

•  20% was earned from a tenant in the legal services industry, whose lease expires on October 31, 2018, and

•  15% was earned from two affiliated tenants in the oil and gas industry, whose leases expire on December 31, 2015.

The tenant leases generally provide for annual rentals that include the tenants’ proportionate share of real estate taxes and certain building operating expenses. The Funds’ tenant leases have remaining terms of up to 20 years and generally include tenant renewal options that can extend the lease terms.

6.   GOVERNING AGREEMENTS AND INVESTOR RIGHTS

Governance of the Fund — The Fund is governed by the Partnership Agreement, as amended and restated on September 1, 2006. The term of the Fund shall continue until the Fund is dissolved pursuant to the provisions of the Partnership Agreement.

Management — Capital, as managing general partner, manages the day-to-day affairs of the Fund. The managing general partner has the power to direct the management, operation, and policies of the Fund subject to oversight of a management board. A subsidiary of Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. holds a non-managing general partner interest in the Fund. The Fund is required to obtain approval from the non-managing general partner for certain significant actions specified in the Partnership Agreement. Hines provides advisory services to the Fund pursuant to an advisory agreement.

121

HINES-SUMISEI U.S. CORE OFFICE FUND, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Governance — The managing general partner is subject to the oversight of a seven-member management board and certain approval rights of the Non-Managing General Partner, the Advisory Committee, and the Limited Partners. The approval of the management board is required for acquiring and disposing of investments, incurring indebtedness, undertaking offerings of equity interests in the Fund, approving annual budgets, and other major decisions as outlined in the Partnership Agreement.

Contributions — A new investor entering the Fund generally acquires units of limited partnership interest pursuant to a subscription agreement under which the investor agrees to contribute a specified amount of capital to the Fund in exchange for units (“Capital Commitment”). A Capital Commitment may be funded and units may be issued in installments; however, the new investor is admitted to the Fund as a limited partner upon payment for the first units issued to the investor. Additional cash contributions for any unfunded commitments are required upon direction by the managing general partner.

Distributions — Cash distributions will be made to the partners of record as of the applicable record dates, not less frequently than quarterly, in proportion to their ownership interests.

Allocation of Profits/Losses — All profits and losses for any fiscal year shall be allocated pro rata among the partners in proportion to their ownership interests. All profit and loss allocations are subject to the special and curative allocations as provided in the Partnership Agreement.

Fees — Unaffiliated limited partners, as defined in the Partnership Agreement, of the Fund pay acquisition and asset management fees to the managing general partner or its designees. These fees are deducted from distributions otherwise payable to a partner and are in addition to, rather than a reduction of, the Capital Commitment of the partner. During the Fund’s initial investment period, which ended on February 2, 2007, these fees were paid 100% in cash. After the initial investment period, they will be paid 50% in cash and 50% in the form of a profits interest intended to approximate Capital having reinvested such 50% of the fees in Partnership units at current unit value.

Redemptions — Beginning with the fiscal year ending after the later of (1) February 2, 2007, or (2) one year after acquisition of such interest, a partner may request redemption of all or a portion of its interest in the Fund at a price equal to the interest’s value based on the net asset value of the Fund at the time of redemption. The Fund will attempt to redeem up to 10%, in the aggregate, of the outstanding interests in the Fund, Core Office Trust, and Core Office Properties during any calendar year, provided that the Fund will not redeem any interests if the managing general partner determines that such redemption would result in any real estate investment trust (“REIT”) in which the Fund has an interest ceasing to qualify as a domestically controlled REIT for U.S. income tax purposes.

Debt — The Fund, through its subsidiaries, may incur debt with respect to any of its investments or future investments in real estate properties, subject to the following limitations at the time the debt is incurred: (1) 65% debt-to-value limitation for each property and (2) 50% aggregate debt-to-value limitation for all Fund assets, excluding in both cases assets held by NY Trust. However, the Fund may exceed the 50% aggregate limitation in (2) above if the managing general partner determines it is advisable to do so as long as the managing general partner makes a reasonable determination that the excess indebtedness will be repaid within one year of its incurrence. NY Trust has a 55% debt-to-value limitation at the time any such indebtedness is incurred. In addition, the Fund, through its subsidiaries, may obtain a credit facility secured by unfunded capital commitments from its partners. Such credit facility will not be counted for purposes of the leverage limitations above, as long as no assets of the Fund are pledged to secure such indebtedness.

Rights of General Motors Investment Management Corporation — The Second Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement among Hines, the Fund, Core Office Properties, NY Trust, Hines Shell Plaza Partners LP (“Shell Plaza Partners”), Hines Three First National Partners LP (“TFN Partners”), Hines 720 Olive Way Partners LP (“720 Olive Way Partners”), Hines 333 West Wacker Partners LP (“333 West Wacker Partners”), Hines Warner Center Partners LP (“Warner Center Partners”), Hines CF Sacramento Partners LP

122

HINES-SUMISEI U.S. CORE OFFICE FUND, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(“CF Sacramento Partners”), General Motors Investment Management Corporation (“GMIMC”) and a number of institutional investors advised by GMIMC (each an “Institutional Co-Investor” and collectively, the “Institutional Co-Investors”), dated October 12, 2005, provides GMIMC with certain co-investment rights with respect to the Fund’s investments. As of December 31, 2007, the Institutional Co-Investors co-invest with the Fund in 10 of the Fund’s Properties, owning effective interests in the Properties as follows:

	Institutional
	Co-Investors’
	Effective
Property	Interest
425 Lexington Ave, 499 Park Ave, 1200 Nineteenth St, 600 Lexington Ave		57.9	%
One Shell Plaza, Two Shell Plaza		49.5
Three First National Plaza		19.8
720 Olive Way		20.0
333 West Wacker		20.0
Warner Center		20.0
Olympus Corporate Centre, Wells Fargo Center, Douglas Corporate Center, Johnson Ranch Corporate Centre, Roseville Corporate Center, Summit at Douglas Ridge		20.0

Co-Investment Rights — GMIMC, on behalf of one or more funds it advises, has the right to co-invest with the Fund in connection with each investment made by the Fund in an amount equal to at least 20% of the total equity capital to be invested in such investment.

GMIMC also has the right, but not the obligation, on behalf of one or more funds it advises, to co-invest with third-party investors in an amount equal to at least 50% of any co-investment capital sought by the Fund from third-party investors for a prospective investment. In order to exercise such third-party co-investment right, GMIMC must invest at least 50% of the equity to be invested from sources other than the Fund.

If the owner of an investment desires to contribute the investment to the Fund and receive interests in the Fund or a subsidiary of the Fund on a tax-deferred basis, GMIMC has no co-investment rights with respect to the portion of such investment being made through the issuance of such tax-deferred consideration.

Redemption Rights — For each asset in which the Institutional Co-Investors acquire interests pursuant to GMIMC’s co-investment rights, the Fund must establish a three-year period ending no later than the 12th anniversary of the date such asset is acquired, unless GMIMC elects to extend it, during which the entity through which the Institutional Co-Investors make their investments will redeem or acquire such Institutional Co-Investors’ interest in such entity at a price based on the net asset value of such entity at the time of redemption date.

Buy/Sell Rights — GMIMC, on behalf of the Institutional Co-Investors having an interest in NY Trust, Shell Plaza Partners, TFN Partners, 720 Olive Way Partners, 333 West Wacker Partners, Warner Center Partners, CF Sacramento Partners and any other entity through which a co-investment is made (each, a “Co-Investment Entity”), on the one hand, and the Fund, on the other hand, have the right to initiate at any time the purchase and sale of any property in which any Institutional Co-Investor has an interest (the “Buy/Sell”). A Buy/Sell is triggered by either party delivering a written notice to the other party that identifies the property and states the value the tendering party assigns to such property (the “Stated Value”). The recipient may elect by written notice to be the buyer or seller with respect to such property or, in the absence of a written response, will be deemed to have elected to be a seller. If the property that is the subject of the Buy/Sell is owned by a Co-Investment Entity that owns more than one property, then such Co-Investment Entity will sell the property to the party determined to be the buyer pursuant to the Buy/Sell notice procedure for the Stated Value, and the proceeds of the sale will be distributed in accordance with the applicable provisions of the constituent documents of the Co-Investment Entity. If the property in question is the only property owned by a

123

HINES-SUMISEI U.S. CORE OFFICE FUND, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Co-Investment Entity, then the party determined to be the buyer pursuant to the Buy/Sell notice procedure will acquire the interest of the selling party in the Co-Investment Entity for an amount equal to the amount that would be distributed to the selling party if the property were sold for the Stated Value and the proceeds distributed in accordance with the applicable provisions of the constituent documents of the Co-Investment Entity. For this purpose, the Shell Buildings and Warner Center are each considered to be a single property.

Rights of IK Funds — As of December 31, 2007, IK US Portfolio Invest GmbH & Co. KG (“IK Fund I”), a limited partnership established under the laws of Germany, owned 109,361 units of limited partner interest in Core Office Properties. Additionally, IK US Portfolio Invest Zwei GmbH & Co. KG (“IK Fund II”) and IK US Portfolio Invest Drei GmbH & Co. KG (“IK Fund III”), each a limited partnership established under the laws of Germany (collectively with IK Fund I, the “IK Funds”), owned 29,809 and 21,019 units, respectively, of limited partnership interest in Core Office Properties. As of March 26, 2008, IK Fund II and IK Fund III had unfunded commitments to invest an additional $127.6 million to Core Office Properties, which is conditioned on IK Fund II and IK Fund III raising sufficient equity capital to fund such commitment. The IK Funds have the right to require Core Office Properties to redeem, at a price based on the net asset value of Core Office Properties as of the date of redemption, all or any portion of its interest, subject to a maximum redemption amount of $150.0 million for IK Fund II and IK Fund III, as of the following dates:

IK Fund	Redemption Date
IK Fund I		December 31, 2014
IK Fund II		December 31, 2016
IK Fund III		December 31, 2017

Any remaining interest not redeemed due to the maximum limitation will be redeemed in the subsequent year or years according to the Partnership Agreement’s redemption policy as described above. The Fund is obligated to provide Core Office Properties with sufficient funds to fulfill this priority redemption right, to the extent sufficient funds are otherwise not available to Core Office Properties. An IK Fund is not entitled to participate in the redemption rights available to Core Office Properties investors prior to such IK Funds’ redemption date.

7.   RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Companies have entered into management agreements with Hines, a related party, to manage the operations of the Properties. As compensation for its services, Hines receives the following:

•  A property management fee equal to the lesser of the amount of the management fee that is allowable under tenant leases or a specific percentage of the gross revenues of the specific Property. The Fund incurred management fees of $8.9 million, $5.8 million, and $3.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively.

•  Salary and wage reimbursements of itson-site property personnel incurred by the Fund for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, were $14.6 million, $10.6 million, and $7.8 million, respectively.

•  Reimbursement for various direct services performed off site that are limited to the amount that is recovered from tenants under their leases and usually will not exceed in any calendar year a per-rentable-square-foot limitation. In certain instances, the per-rentable-square-foot limitation may be exceeded with the excess offset against property management fees received. For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, reimbursable services to Hines from the Fund were $2.6 million, $1.7 million, and $2.6 million, respectively.

•  Leasing commissions equal to 1.5% of gross revenues payable over the term of each executed lease, including any lease amendment, renewal, expansion, or similar event. Leasing commissions of

124

HINES-SUMISEI U.S. CORE OFFICE FUND, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

$3.4 million, $3.5 million, and $2.9 million were incurred by the Fund during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively.

•  Construction management fees of approximately $93,000, $64,000, and $52,000 were incurred by the Fund during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively.

•  Development management fees equal to 2.5% of the total project costs related to the redevelopment, plus direct costs incurred by Hines in connection with providing the related services. Development management fees of approximately $790,000 were incurred by the Fund during the year ended December 31, 2007.

•  Other fees, primarily related to legal fees, information technology and security services provided by Setec Protection Service Limited Partnership (“SETEC”), an affiliate of Hines, in the amounts of $1.2 million, $1.1 million, and $1.0 million were incurred by the Fund during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively.

Certain Companies of the Fund have entered into lease agreements with Hines Core Fund Services, LLC (“Services”), an affiliate of Hines, for the operation of their respective parking garages. Under the terms of the lease agreements, the Fund received rental fees of $6.2 million, $4.5 million, and $3.4 million during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. Receivables due to the Fund from Services were approximately $679,000 and $386,000 at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

In addition, the Fund has related party payables owed to Hines and its affiliated entities at December 31, 2007 and 2006, of $5.2 million and $4.2 million, respectively, for accrued management fees, payroll expense, leasing commissions, off-site services, and legal and other general and administrative costs.

8.   LEASE OBLIGATIONS

The Shell Buildings are subject to certain ground leases that expire in 2065 and 2066. One ground lease that was to expire in 2065 contained a purchase option that allowed the Fund to purchase the land in June 2006. The Fund exercised the purchase option and paid the purchase price of $1.2 million in June 2006. A second ground lease that expires in 2065 contains a purchase option that allows the Fund to purchase the land within a five-year period that begins in June 2026. The remaining ground leases do not contain purchase options.

One Atlantic Center is subject to a ground lease that expires in 2033. The ground lease contains renewal options at10-year term increments, up to a total term of 99 years.

Renaissance Square is subject to two ground leases that expire June 30, 2032. The ground leases contain renewal options for two additional periods of five years each.

Straight-line rent payable included on the Fund’s consolidated balance sheets consists of the difference between the rental payments due under the lease calculated on a straight-line basis from the date of acquisition or the lease commencement date over the remaining term of the lease and the actual rent due under the lease.

125

HINES-SUMISEI U.S. CORE OFFICE FUND, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

As of December 31, 2007, required payments under the terms of the leases are as follows (in thousands):

	Fixed Future
	Minimum
Years Ending December 31	Rentals
2008	$	3,574
2009		3,633
2010		3,695
2011		3,759
2012		3,829
Thereafter		249,272
Total	$	267,762

Ground lease expense for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, was $3.8 million, $2.0 million, and approximately $502,000, respectively, and is included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

9.   FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Disclosure about fair value of financial instruments is based on pertinent information available to management as of December 31, 2007 and 2006. Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop estimated fair values. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Fund could obtain on disposition of the financial instruments. The use of different market assumptionsand/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, management estimates that the carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, tenant and other receivables, accounts payable and accrued expenses, other liabilities and distributions payable are recorded at amounts that reasonably approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these items. Fair value of fixed rate notes payable at December 31, 2007 and 2006, was approximately $2,102.3 million and $1,516.2 million, respectively, based upon interest rates available for the issuance of debt with similar terms and maturities, with carrying amounts of $2,169.7 million and $1,538.6 million, respectively. Fair value of the variable rate notes payable approximates its carrying amount of $144.2 million and $32.7 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

126

HINES-SUMISEI U.S. CORE OFFICE FUND, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

10.   SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURES

Supplemental cash disclosures were as follows (in thousands):

	2007		2006		2005
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION — Cash paid during the period for interest	$	100,694	$	61,432	$	42,496
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Accrued additions to investment property	$	3,209	$	1,364	$	2,836
Distributions declared and unpaid	$	21,552	$	17,218	$	13,960
Dividends declared and unpaid to minority interest holders	$	11,758	$	11,674	$	7,256
Conversion of minority interests	$	—	$	—	$	18,837
Mortgage assumed upon acquisition of property	$	181,935	$	134,017	$	—
Security deposits assumed upon acquisition of property	$	1,486	$	1,644	$	—

11.   COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

In March 2005, the FASB issued FIN No. 47,Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations — an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143,which clarifies the term “conditional asset retirement obligation” as used in SFAS No. 143,Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.A conditional asset retirement obligation refers to a legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity when the timingand/or method of settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be in the control of the entity. This legal obligation is absolute, despite the uncertainty regarding the timingand/or method of settlement. In addition, the fair value of a liability for the conditional asset retirement obligation should be recognized when incurred, generally upon acquisition, construction, or developmentand/or through normal operation of the asset. FIN No. 47 also clarifies when an entity would have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation. Pursuant to FIN No. 47, the Fund has determined that certain assets meet the criteria for recording a liability and has recorded an asset retirement obligation aggregating approximately $2.6 million and $2.4 million as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, which is included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.

The Fund is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. These matters are generally covered by insurance. While the resolution of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes the final outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Fund’s consolidated financial statements.

12.   REDEVELOPMENT OF 1200 NINETEETH STREET

On October 8, 2007, the Fund entered into a construction contract for the redevelopment of the property located at 1200 Nineteenth Street in Washington, D.C., for a maximum guaranteed payment of $46.2 million. As of December 31, 2007, $2.8 million of the maximum guaranteed payment had been paid and $1.1 million and approximately $440,000 is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses and other liabilities, respectively, in the consolidated balance sheets.

Due to the redevelopment, the Fund had a change in an accounting estimate relating to the useful lives of building and improvements at 1200 Nineteenth Street. The change in useful lives resulted in the Fund recognizing depreciation expense for the building and improvements that were disposed due to the

127

HINES-SUMISEI U.S. CORE OFFICE FUND, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

redevelopment. At December 31, 2007, building and improvements disposed in the redevelopment had been fully depreciated.

13.   SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On January 11, 2008, the name of the Fund was changed from Hines-Sumisei U.S. Core Office Fund, L.P. to Hines US Core Office Fund LP.

On February 22, 2008, the Fund entered into a contract with an unaffiliated third party to acquire, subject to customary closing conditions, One North Wacker, an office property located in the central business district in Chicago, Illinois. The contract purchase price for One North Wacker is expected to be approximately $540.0 million, exclusive of transaction costs, financing fees and working capital reserves. The Fund anticipates that the acquisition will be funded with equity contributions, borrowings under a revolving credit facility agreement held by its subsidiary and mortgage financing assumed in connection with the acquisition. The building is a 51-story office tower that was constructed in 2001. The building contains approximately 1.4 million square feet (unaudited) of rentable area and is approximately 98% leased (unaudited). The Fund anticipates that the acquisition of One North Wacker will be consummated on March 31, 2008. Although management believes the acquisition of One North Wacker is probable, the closing of such acquisition is subject to a number of conditions and there can be no guarantee that the acquisition of One North Wacker will be consummated. If the Fund elects not to close on One North Wacker, it will forfeit $50.0 million in earnest money deposit made.

* * * * * *

128

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of

Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.

Houston, Texas

We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007, and have issued our report thereon dated March 27, 2008; such report is included elsewhere in thisForm 10-K. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of the Company listed in Item 15. The financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Houston, Texas

March 27, 2008

129

Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.

Schedule III — Real Estate Assets and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 2007

											Costs			Gross Amount at Which Carried													Life on Which
				Initial Cost							Capitalized			at 12/31/2007													Depreciation is
Description						Buildings and					Subsequent to					Buildings and				Accumulated			Date of			Date	Computed
(a)	Location	Encumbrances		Land		Improvements		Total			Acquisition			Land		Improvements		Total		Depreciation			Construction			Acquired	(c)
	(In thousands)
1900 and 2000 Alameda	San Mateo, California	$	33,065	$	18,522	$	28,023	$	46,545		$	1,836		$	18,522	$	29,859	$	48,381	$	(2,641	)		1971,1983		June-05	0 to 40 years
Citymark	Dallas, Texas		15,303		6,796		18,667		25,463			(3,892	)		6,796		14,775		21,571		(5,617	)		1987		August-05	0 to 40 years
1515 S Street	Sacramento, California		45,000		13,099		61,753		74,852			349			13,099		62,102		75,201		(5,226	)		1987		November-05	0 to 40 years
Airport Corporate Center	Miami, Florida		90,039		44,292		112,884		157,176			(2,980	)		44,292		109,904		154,196		(7,969	)		1982-1996	(d)	January-06	0 to 40 years
321 North Clark	Chicago, Illinois		136,632		27,896		217,330		245,226			(599	)		27,896		216,731		244,627		(18,233	)		1987		April-06	0 to 40 years
3400 Data Drive	Rancho Cordova, California		18,079		4,514		28,452		32,966			43			4,516		28,493		33,009		(1,827	)		1990		November-06	0 to 40 years
Watergate Tower IV	Emeryville, California		79,921		31,280		113,527		144,807			(103	)		31,258		113,446		144,704		(5,850	)		2001		December-06	0 to 40 years
Daytona Buildings	Redmond, Washington		53,458		19,204		76,181		95,385			(723	)		19,197		75,465		94,662		(4,144	)		2002		December-06	0 to 40 years
Laguna Buildings	Redmond, Washington		65,542		29,175		94,220		123,395			1			29,173		94,223		123,396		(6,208	)		1987		January-07	0 to 40 years
Atrium on Bay	Toronto, Ontario		197,092		53,914		224,868		278,782	(f)		1,166			53,914		226,034		279,948		(9,709	)		1987		February-07	0 to 40 years
Seattle Design Center	Seattle, Washington		31,000		15,683		42,510		58,193			59			15,685		42,567		58,252		(1,771	)		1973,1983	(b)	June-07	0 to 40 years
5th and Bell	Seattle, Washington		39,000		3,533		65,612		69,145			32			3,533		65,644		69,177		(1,378	)		2002		June -07	0 to 40 years
3 Huntington Quadrangle	Melville, New York		48,000		16,698		73,106		89,804			277			16,698		73,383		90,081		(2,905	)		1971		July-07	0 to 40 years
One Wilshire	Los Angeles, California		159,500		32,618		266,009		298,627			(63	)		32,618		265,946		298,564		(4,963	)		1966		August-07	0 to 40 years
Minneapolis Office/Flex Portfolio	Minneapolis, Minnesota		45,000		23,308		64,314		87,622			52			23,308		64,366		87,674		(1,669	)		1986-1999	(e)	September-07	0 to 40 years
JPMorgan Chase Tower	Dallas, Texas		160,000		9,274		301,133		310,407			(1	)		9,273		301,133		310,406		(1,849	)		1987		November-07	0 to 40 years
Total		$	1,216,631	$	349,806	$	1,788,589	$	2,138,395		$	(4,546	)	$	349,778	$	1,784,071	$	2,133,849	$	(81,959	)

(a)	All assets are institutional-quality office properties.
(b)	Seattle Design Center consists of a two-story office building constructed in 1973 and a five-story office building with an underground garage constructed in 1983.
(c)	Real estate assets are depreciated or amortized using the straight-lined method over the useful lives of the assets by class. Generally, tenant inducements and lease intangibles are amortized over the respective lease term. Building improvements are depreciated over 5-25 years and buildings are depreciated over 40 years.
(d)	Airport Corporate Center consists of 11 buildings constructed between 1982 and 1996 and a 5.46-acre land development site.
(e)	The Minneapolis Office/Flex Portfolio consists of nine buildings constructed between 1986 and 1999.
(f)	Components of Initial Cost for this property were converted from Canadian dollars to U.S. dollars using $1.0194, the currency exchange rate as of December 31, 2007.

The changes in total real estate assets for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):

	2007			2006			2005
Gross real estate assets
Balance, beginning of period	$	822,790		$	146,907		$	—
Additions during the period:
Acquisitions		1,315,975			675,560			146,859
Other		5,028			1,533			48
Deductions during the period:		—			—			—
Fully-depreciated assets		(9,944	)		(1,210	)		—
Ending Balance	$	2,133,849		$	822,790		$	146,907
Accumulated Depreciation
Balance, beginning of period	$	(24,461	)	$	(3,330	)	$	—
Depreciation		(67,442	)		(22,341	)		(3,330	)
Fully-depreciated assets		9,944			1,210			—
Ending Balance	$	(81,959	)	$	(24,461	)	$	(3,330	)

130

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized representative.

HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
(registrant)

March 27, 2008 By:  /s/  Charles M. Baughn Charles M. Baughn
Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on the 27th day of March, 2008.

Signature	Title
/s/  Charles M. Baughn Charles M. Baughn	Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
/s/  Charles N. Hazen Charles N. Hazen	President and Chief Operating Officer
/s/  Sherri W. Schugart Sherri W. Schugart	Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
/s/  Frank R. Apollo Frank R. Apollo	Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
/s/  Jeffrey C. Hines Jeffrey C. Hines	Chairman of the Board of Directors
/s/  C. Hastings Johnson C. Hastings Johnson	Director
/s/  George A. Davis George A. Davis	Independent Director
/s/  Thomas A. Hassard Thomas A. Hassard	Independent Director
/s/  Stanley D. Levy Stanley D. Levy	Independent Director

131

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit
No.			Description
	3	.1	Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 13, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference).
	3	.2	Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 28, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
	4	.1	Form of Subscription Agreement (filed as Appendix A to the Prospectus included in the Second Registration Statement and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.1	Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Hines REIT Properties, L.P. (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Amendment No. 5 to the Initial Registration Statement on May 24, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.2	Form of Property Management and Leasing Agreement between Hines REIT Properties, L.P. and Hines Interests Limited Partnership (filed as Exhibit 3.3 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.3	Advisory Agreement, dated June 26, 2006, by and among Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., Hines REIT Properties, L.P., and Hines Advisors Limited Partnership (filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.4	Employee and Director Incentive Share Plan of Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Amendment No. 2 to the Initial Registration Statement on March 2, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.5	Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment Plan (filed as Appendix B to the Prospectus included in the Second Registration Statement filed on June 19, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.6	Sixth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Hines-Sumisei U.S. Core Office Fund, L.P., dated May 9, 2005, as amended and restated December 1, 2005 (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to Post Effective Amendment No. 7 to the Initial Registration Statement on February 14, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.7	Third Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of Hines-Sumisei N.Y. Core Office Trust, dated December 21, 2005 (filed as Exhibit 10.7 to Post Effective Amendment No. 7 to the Initial Registration Statement on February 14, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.8	Amended and Restated Bylaws of Hines-Sumisei NY Core Office Trust (filed as Exhibit 10.8 to Amendment No. 2 to the Initial Registration Statement on March 2, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.9	Amended and Restated Master Agreement dated as of March 31, 2003, among Hines Interests Limited Partnership, Hines US Core Office Properties LP and Sumitomo Life Realty (N.Y.), Inc., as amended (filed as Exhibit 10.9 to Amendment No. 2 to the Initial Registration Statement on March 2, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.10	Second Amended and Restated Shareholder Agreement for Hines-Sumisei NY Core Office Trust, dated as of December 21, 2005 (filed as Exhibit 10.10 to Post Effective Amendment No. 7 to the Initial Registration Statement on February 14, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.11	Second Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement, dated as of October 12, 2005 (filed as Exhibit 10.11 to Post Effective Amendment No. 7 to the Initial Registration Statement on February 14, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.12	Amended and Restated Organization Agreement for Hines-Sumisei NY Core Office Trust, dated as of December 23, 2003, by and among General Motors Investment Management Corporation, Hines Interests Limited Partnership, Hines-Sumisei U.S. Core Office Fund, L.P., Hines Sumisei NY Core Office Trust and various shareholders to Hines-Sumisei NY Core Office Trust (filed as Exhibit 10.12 to Amendment No. 2 to the Initial Registration Statement on March 2, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).

Exhibit
No.			Description
	10	.13	Amended Declaration of Trust of Hines-Sumisei NY Core Office Trust II (filed as Exhibit 10.13 to Amendment No. 2 to the Initial Registration Statement on March 2, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.14	Amended Bylaws of Hines-Sumisei NY Core Office Trust II (filed as Exhibit 10.14 to Amendment No. 2 to the Initial Registration Statement on March 2, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.15	Shareholder Agreement for Hines-Sumisei NY Core Office Trust II, dated as of February 2, 2004, by and among General Motors Investment Management Corporation, Hines-Sumisei U.S. Core Office Fund, L.P., Hines-Sumisei NY Core Office Trust II and certain shareholders of Hines-Sumisei NY Core Office Trust II (filed as Exhibit 10.15 to Amendment No. 2 to the Initial Registration Statement on March 2, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.16	Subscription Agreement for Hines-Sumisei NY Core Office Trust and Hines-Sumisei NY Core Office Trust II, dated as of February 2, 2004, by and among General Motors Investment Management Corporation, Hines Interests Limited Partnership, Hines-Sumisei U.S. Core Office Fund, L.P., Hines-Sumisei NY Core Office Trust, Hines-Sumisei NY Core Office Trust II and various shareholders of Hines-Sumisei NY Core Office Trust and Hines-Sumisei NY Core Office Trust II (filed as Exhibit 10.16 to Amendment No. 2 to the Initial Registration Statement on March 2, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.17	Subscription Agreement, dated as of September 11, 2003, between Hines REIT Properties, L.P. and Hines Real Estate Holdings Limited Partnership (filed as Exhibit 10.17 to Amendment No. 2 to the Initial Registration Statement on March 2, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.18	Agreement, dated as of June 3, 2004, between Hines REIT Properties, L.P., Hines U.S. Core Office Capital Associates II Limited Partnership and Hines-Sumisei U.S. Core Office Fund, L.P. (filed as Exhibit 10.18 to Amendment No. 6 to the Initial Registration Statement on June 10, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.19	Amended and Restated Escrow Agreement between Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (filed as Exhibit 10.19 to Amendment No. 2 to the Initial Registration Statement on March 2, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.20	Articles of Amendment dated May 4, 2004 to the Declaration of Trust of Hines-Sumisei N.Y. Core Office Trust (filed as Exhibit 10.20 to Amendment No. 5 to the Initial Registration Statement on May 25, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference) (superseded by Exhibit No. 10.7).
	10	.21	Articles of Amendment dated May 4, 2004 to the Declaration of Trust of Hines-Sumisei N.Y. Core Office Trust II (filed as Exhibit 10.21 to Amendment No. 5 to the Initial Registration Statement on May 25, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.22	Articles of Amendment dated December 27, 2004 to the Declaration of Trust of Hines-Sumisei N.Y. Core Office Trust (filed as Exhibit 10.22 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference) (superseded by Exhibit No. 10.7).
	10	.23	Articles of Amendment dated December 27, 2004 to the Declaration of Trust of Hines-Sumisei N.Y. Core Office Trust II (filed as Exhibit 10.23 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.24	Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated November 23, 2004, by and among Hines U.S. Core Office Capital Associates II Limited Partnership, Hines REIT Properties, L.P. and Hines U.S. Core Office Capital LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.22 to Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Initial Registration Statement on February 22, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.25	Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated February 1, 2005, by and among Hines US Core LLC, Hines REIT Properties, L.P. and Hines U.S. Core Office Capital LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.23 to Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Initial Registration Statement on February 22, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.26	Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Hines-Sumisei US Core Office Properties LP (filed as Exhibit 10.26 to Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Initial Registration Statement on February 22, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.27	Indemnification Agreement between Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and Jeffrey C. Hines (filed as Exhibit 10.27 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).

Exhibit
No.			Description
	10	.28	Indemnification Agreement between Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and C. Hastings Johnson (filed as Exhibit 10.28 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.29	Indemnification Agreement between Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and George A. Davis (filed as Exhibit 10.29 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.30	Indemnification Agreement between Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and Thomas A. Hassard (filed as Exhibit 10.30 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.31	Indemnification Agreement between Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and Stanley D. Levy (filed as Exhibit 10.31 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.32	Indemnification Agreement between Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and Charles M. Baughn (filed as Exhibit 10.32 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.33	Indemnification Agreement between Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and Charles N. Hazen (filed as Exhibit 10.33 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10 for the year ended December 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.34	Indemnification Agreement between Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and Sherri W. Schugart (filed as Exhibit 10.34 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.35	Indemnification Agreement between Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and Frank R. Apollo (filed as Exhibit 10.35 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.36	Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2005, by and among Hines US Core LLC, Hines REIT Properties L.P. and Hines U.S. Core Office Capital LLC (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 1, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.37	Agreement of Sale, dated March 10, 2005, by and between Madison Two Associates and Hines 70 West Madison LP (filed as Exhibit 10.37 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.38	Agreement of Purchase and Sale, dated as of May 19, 2005, between OTR, an Ohio general Partnership acting as duly authorized nominee of the Board of the State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio, and Hines REIT Properties, L.P. (filed as Exhibit 10.38 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.39	Property Management and leasing Agreement, dated as of June 28, 2005, by and between Hines Interests Limited Partnership and 1900/2000 Alameda de las Pulgas LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.39 to Post Effective Amendment No. 4 to the Initial Registration Statement on August 22, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.40	Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Real Property and Escrow Instructions between GREIT — 525 and 600 B Street, LP and Hines-Sumisei US Core Office Properties, LP, dated June 27, 2005 (filed as Exhibit 10.41 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.41	Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of July 25, 2005, by and among Hines US Core LLC, as seller, Hines REIT Properties L.P., as buyer, and acknowledged by Hines U.S. Core Office Capital LLC, the managing general partner of Hines-Sumisei U.S. Core Office Fund, L.P. (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 25, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.42	Term Loan Agreement, made and entered into as of June 28, 2005, by and between Hines REIT Properties, L.P. and KeyBank National Association, as agent for itself and the other lending institutions which may become parties thereto (filed as Exhibit 10.39 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).

Exhibit
No.			Description
	10	.43	Ownership Interests Pledge and Security Agreement, dated June 28, 2005, by and between Hines REIT Properties, L.P. and KeyBank National Association, in its capacity as administrative agent (filed as Exhibit 10.40 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.44	First Amendment to Term Loan Agreement, dated August 23, 2005, between Hines RIET Properties, L.P. and KeyBank National Association, as administrative agent, and the other lenders from time to time parties to that certain Credit Agreement dated September 9, 2005 (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.45	Revolving Line of Credit Agreement, dated September 9, 2005, by and between Hines REIT Properties, L.P., and KeyBank National Association, as administrative agent, and the other lenders from time to time parties thereto (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.46	Unconditional Guaranty of Payment and Performance of Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. in favor of KeyBank National Association, as administrative agent, and the other lenders from time to time parties to that certain Credit Agreement dated September 9, 2005 (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.47	Ownership Interests Pledge and Security Agreement of Hines REIT Properties, L.P. dated September 9, 2005 (filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.48	Subordination Agreement, dated September 9, 2005, among Hines REIT Properties, L.P., Hines Advisors Limited Partnership, Hines Interests Limited Partnership and KeyBank National Association (filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.49	Agreement of Sale and Purchase, dated as of August 9, 2005 between Centex Office Citymark I, L.P. and Hines REIT Properties, L.P. (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.50	Agreement for Purchase of Office Building, dated effective as of August 12, 2005, between Hines REIT Properties, L.P. and JB Management L.P., as amended (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.51	Agreement of Sale, dated October 12, 2005, by and between Miami RPFIV Airport Corporate Center Associates Limited Liability Company and Hines REIT Properties, L.P. (including first through fourth amendments)(filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.52	Letter Agreement, dated November 9, 2005, among Hines-Sumisei U.S. Core Office Fund, L.P., Hines US Core Office Capital LLC and Hines REIT Properties, L.P. (filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.53	Subscription Agreement, dated November 14, 2005, between Hines-Sumisei U.S. Core Office Fund, L.P. and Hines REIT Properties, L.P. (filed as Exhibit 10.53 to the Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed by the registrant on December 2, 2005 (File No. 333-130114, the “Second Registration Statement”) and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.54	Fifth Amendment, dated November 16, 2005, to Agreement of Sale, dated October 12,2005, by and between Miami RPFIV Airport Corporate Center Associates Limited Liability Company and Hines REIT Properties, L.P. (filed as Exhibit 10.54 to the Second Registration Statement and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.55	Sixth Amendment, dated January 20, 2006, to Agreement of Sale, dated October 12, 2005, by and between Miami RPFIV Airport Corporate Center Associates Limited Liability Company and Hines REIT Properties, L.P. (filed as Exhibit 10.55 to Post Effective Amendment No. 7 to the Initial Registration Statement and incorporated herein by reference).

Exhibit
No.			Description
	10	.56	Purchase and Sale Agreement between Kan Am Grund Kapitalanlagegesellschaft MBH and Hines-Sumisei U.S. Core Office Properties, LP, dated as of March 10, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.56 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10- K for the year ended December 31, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.57	Purchase and Sale Agreement between 321 North Clark Realty L.L.C. and Hines REIT Properties, LP, dated as of March 23, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.57 to the registrant’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.58	Agreement of Purchase and Sale by and between WXIII/SCV Real Estate Limited Partnership and Hines 720 Olive Way LP, dated as of December 29, 2005, as amended by First Amendment, dated as of January 6, 2006, and Second Amendment, dated January 11, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.58 to Post Effective Amendment No. 8 to the Initial Registration Statement on April 14, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.59	Deed of Trust, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing, dated as of April 18, 2006, by and between Hines REIT 1515 S Street LP, First American Title Insurance Company and MetLife Banle, N.A., and Promissory Notes, dated April 18, 2006, executed by Hines REIT 1515 S Street LP. (filed as Exhibit 10.59 to Amendment No. 1 to the Second Registration Statement and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.60	Term Loan Agreement, dated as of April 24, 2006, between Hines REIT Properties, L.P., KeyBank National Association and the other Lenders party thereto, and Promissory Note executed by Hines REIT Properties, L.P., dated April 24, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.60 to Amendment No. 1 to the Second Registration Statement and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.61	Unconditional Guaranty of Payment and Performance of Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. in favor of KeyBank National Association, dated April 24, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.61 to Amendment No. 1 to the Second Registration Statement and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.62	Ownership Interests Pledge and Security Agreement of Hines REIT Properties, L.P., dated April 24, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.62 to Amendment No. 1 to the Second Registration Statement and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.63	Subordination Agreement, dated April 24, 2006, among Hines REIT Properties, L.P., Hines Advisors Limited Partnership, Hines Interests Limited Partnership and KeyBank National Association (filed as Exhibit 10.63 to Amendment No. 1 to the Second Registration Statement and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.64	Contract of Sale by and between Sumitomo Life Realty (N.Y.), Inc. and Hines One Atlantic Center LP, dated May 18, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.64 to Amendment No. 2 to the Second Registration Statement and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.65	Agreement by and between Hines REIT Properties, L.P. and HSH Nordbank AG NY Branch dated June 5, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.65 to Amendment No. 2 to the Second Registration Statement and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.66	Selected Dealer Agreement, dated July 20, 2006, by and among Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., Hines Real Estate Securities, Inc., Hines Advisors Limited Partnership, Hines Interests Limited Partnership and Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.67	Reimbursement Agreement, dated July 20, 2006, by and between Hines Interests Limited Partnership and Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.68	Agreement of Purchase and Sale, dated as of September 27, 2006, between MP Warner Center, LLC, MP Warner Center III, LLC, and Hines-Sumisei US Core Office Properties LP (as amended by Amendments No. 1, dated September 15, 2006, and No. 2, dated September 27, 2006) (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,2006 and incorporated herein by reference).

Exhibit
No.			Description
	10	.69	Credit Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2006, among Hines REIT 3100 McKinnon Street LP, Hines REIT 1900/2000 Alameda de las Pulgas LLC, Hines REIT 321 North Clark Street LLC and the Borrowing Base Subsidiaries party thereto from time to time, as Borrowers, Hines REIT Properties, L.P., as Sponsor, and HSH Nordbank AG, New York Branch and the Lenders party thereto from time to time, as Lenders (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.70	Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated November 1, 2006, between 3400 Data Drive Associates, LLC and Hines Real Estate Properties, L.P. (filed as Exhibit 10.70 to Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Second Registration Statement and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.71	Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2006, between Commerz Grundbesitz-Investmentgesellschaft mbH, a limited liability company under German Law, acting as investment company for the account of the German open-ended real estate investment fund Haus Invest Global and Hines Riverfront Plaza LP. (filed as Exhibit 10.71 to Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Second Registration Statement and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.72	First Amendment to Credit Agreement and other Credit Documents, dated November 8, 2006, by and among Hines REIT Properties, L.P. and KeyBank National Association, for itself and the other lending institutions party to the Credit Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.72 to Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Second Registration Statement and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.73	Real Estate Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated November 28, 2006, by and among Laguna North Building Sellers, Laguna North Land Sellers, Laguna South Building Sellers, Laguna South Land Sellers, FC27 Sellers and Hines REIT Laguna Campus LLC, and First Amendment thereto, dated November 29, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.73 to Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Second Registration Statement and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.74	Real Estate Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated November 28, 2006, by and among Daytona Building Sellers, RCC Building Sellers, Daytona-RCC Land Sellers and Hines REIT Daytona Campus LLC, and First Amendment thereto, dated November 29, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.74 to Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Second Registration Statement and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.75	Real Estate Sale Agreement, by and between CA Watergate Tower IV Limited Partnership and Hines REIT Watergate, LP., and First Amendment thereto, dated December 8, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.75 to Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Second Registration Statement and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.76	Agreement of Purchase and Sale between The Atrium on Bay Inc. as vender and Hines REIT Properties, L.P. as Purchaser, dated December 22, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.76 to Post Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Second Registration Statement and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.77	First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of January 19, 2007, among Hines REIT 3100 McKinnon Street LP, Hines REIT 1900/2000 Alameda de las Pulgas LLC, Hines REIT 321 North Clark Street LLC and the Borrowing, Base Subsidiaries party thereto from time to time, as Borrowers, Hines REIT Properties, LP., as sponsor, HSH Nordbank AG, New York Branch, as lender and as Agent and Arranger, and the lenders party thereto from time to time (filed as Exhibit 10.77 to Post Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Second Registration Statement and incorporated herein by reference).
	10	.78	Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of March 27, 2007, by and between Bay West Design Center, LLC, Bay West Seattle, LLC, and Hines REIT Properties, L.P. (filed as Exhibit 10.78 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to the Second Registration Statement on April 16, 2007, and incorporated by reference herein).
	10	.79	Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of May 11, 2007, by and between Touchstone Venture II and Hines REIT Properties, L.P. (filed as Exhibit 10.79 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to the Second Registration Statement on July 16, 2007, and incorporated by reference herein).
	10	.80	Purchase and Sale Agreement and Joint Escrow Instructions, dated as of July 11, 2007, by and between Carlyle One Wilshire II, L.P. and Hines REIT One Wilshire LP (filed as Exhibit 10.80 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to the Second Registration Statement on July 16, 2007, and incorporated by reference herein).

Exhibit
No.			Description
	10	.81	Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of June 4, 2007, by and between 3 Huntington Quadrangle, LLC, and Hines REIT Properties, L.P. (filed as Exhibit 10.81 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to the Second Registration Statement on July 16, 2007, and incorporated by reference herein).
	10	.82	Agreement of Purchase and Sale, dated September 25, 2007, between Firstcal Industrial 2 Acquisition, LLC and Hines REIT Minneapolis Industrial LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K on October 1, 2007, and incorporated by reference herein).
	10	.83	First Amendment , dated September 27, 2007, to the Agreement of Purchase and Sale, dated September 25, 2007 between Firstcal Industrial 2 Acquisition, LLC and Hines REIT Minneapolis Industrial LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K on October 1, 2007, and incorporated by reference herein).
	10	.84	Agreement of Purchase and Sale, dated October 16, 2007, between 2200 Ross, L.P., and Hines REIT 2200 Ross Avenue, L.P. (filed as Exhibit 10.84 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to the Second Registration Statement on October 16, 2007, and incorporated by reference herein).
	10	.85	Deed of Trust and Security Agreement, dated October 25, 2007, by and between Hines REIT One Wilshire LP, First American Title Insurance Company and The Prudential Insurance Company of America (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K on October 31, 2007, and incorporated by reference herein).
	10	.86	Promissory Note by and between Hines REIT One Wilshire LP and The Prudential Insurance Company of America, dated October 25, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K on October 31, 2007, and incorporated by reference herein).
	10	.87	Environmental Liability by and between Hines REIT One Wilshire LP and The Prudential Insurance Company of America, dated October 25, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K on October 31, 2007, and incorporated by reference herein).
	10	.88	Agreement of Purchase and Sale, dated December 17, 2007, between Newkirk Segair L.P., LLC and Hines REIT El Segundo LP (filed as Exhibit 10.88 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 8 to the Second Registration Statement on January 16, 2008, and incorporated by reference herein).
	10	.89	Loan Facility Agreement, dated as of December 20, 2007, between Hines REIT 2007 Facility Holdings LLC and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (filed as Exhibit 10.89 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 8 to the Second Registration Statement on January 16, 2008, and incorporated by reference herein).
	10	.90	Deed of Trust, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing between Hines REIT 2200 Ross Avenue LP and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (filed as Exhibit 10.90 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 8 to the Second Registration Statement on January 16, 2008, and incorporated by reference herein)
	10	.91	Promissory Note between Hines REIT 2200 Ross Avenue LP and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (filed as Exhibit 10.91 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 8 to the Second Registration Statement on January 16, 2008, and incorporated by reference herein).
	10	.92	Mortgage, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing between Hines REIT Minneapolis Industrial LLC and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (filed as Exhibit 10.92 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 8 to the Second Registration Statement on January 16, 2008, and incorporated by reference herein).
	10	.93	Promissory Note between Hines REIT Minneapolis Industrial LLC and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (filed as Exhibit 10.93 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 8 to the Second Registration Statement on January 16, 2008, and incorporated by reference herein).
	21	.1	List of Subsidiaries of Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 21.1 to the Second Registration Statement and incorporated herein by reference).
	31	.1*	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	31	.2*	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	32	.1*	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Pursuant to SEC Release 34-47551 this Exhibit is furnished to the SEC and shall not be deemed to be “filed.”

* Filed herewith