Hines Real Estate Investment Trust POS AM Prospectus update (post-effective amendment)

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 28, 2010

Registration No. 333-148854

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Post-Effective Amendment No. 6

to

Form S-11

REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in governing instruments)

2800 Post Oak Boulevard Suite 5000 Houston, Texas 77056-6118 (888) 220-6121 (Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including, area code, of principal executive offices) Charles N. Hazen 2800 Post Oak Boulevard Suite 5000 Houston, Texas 77056-6118 (888) 220-6121 (Name and address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)

With a copy to:

Judith D. Fryer, Esq.

Greenberg Traurig, LLP

200 Park Avenue

New York, New York 10166

(212) 801-9200

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public:  as soon as practicable after this registration statement becomes effective.

If this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  o

If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  o

If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  o

If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434, check the following box.  o

This Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 consists of:

• Sticker Supplement No. 8 dated April 27, 2010, which will be affixed to the bottom five inches of the cover page of our prospectus dated April 30, 2009 (the “Prospectus”), so that it will not cover the bullet risk factors on the cover page. This supplement supplements, modifies or supersedes certain information in the Prospectus and supersedes and replaces supplements No. 1 though No. 7, dated May 19, 2009 through December 8, 2009. The Prospectus superseded and replaced the original prospectus for this offering, dated July 1, 2008, and all prior supplements to such prospectus;

• our Prospectus, previously filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3), dated April 30, 2009 and re-filed herewith;

• Part II, included herewith; and

• signatures, included herewith.

This Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 is identical to Post-Effective Amendment No. 5, which was filed on April 28, 2010, except that the section entitled “Updates to the Incorporation by Reference Section” now includes a bullet that references a Current Report on Form 8-K (filed on April 28, 2010) which includes pro forma consolidated financial statements of Hines REIT.

1

HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.

STICKER SUPPLEMENT NO. 8

Sticker Supplement No. 8 dated April 27, 2010, to our prospectus dated April 30, 2009 (the “Prospectus”), updates information in the “Questions and Answers about this Offering,” “Prospectus Summary,” “Risk Factors,” “Management,” “Management Compensation, Expense Reimbursements and Operating Partnership Participation Interest,” “Our Real Estate Investments,” “Investment Objectives and Policies with Respect to Certain Activities,” “Selected Financial Data,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Plan of Distribution,” “The Operating Partnership,” “ERISA Considerations,” “Legal Proceedings,” “Reports to Shareholders,” “Experts,” “Incorporation by Reference” and “Financial Statements” sections of the Prospectus. This supplement No. 8 supplements, modifies or supersedes certain information in the Prospectus and supersedes and replaces prior supplements No. 1 through No. 7, dated May 19, 2009 though December 8, 2009, to our Prospectus, and must be read in conjunction with the Prospectus.

2

HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.

SUPPLEMENT NO. 8 DATED APRIL 27, 2010

TO THE PROSPECTUS DATED APRIL 30, 2009

This prospectus supplement (this “Supplement”) is part of and should be read in conjunction with the prospectus of Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., dated April 30, 2009 (the “Prospectus”). The Prospectus superseded and replaced the original prospectus for this offering, dated July 1, 2008, and all supplements to the prior prospectus. This Supplement supersedes and replaces all prior supplements to this Prospectus. Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms used in this Supplement shall have the same meanings as in the Prospectus.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Supplement No. 8 Page Number	Prospectus Page Number
A.	Status of Our Current Public Offering	3	N.A
B.	Distributions Authorized by Our Board of Directors and Change in the Distribution Rate	4	xi, 7, 22
C.	Modifications to Our Share Redemption Program	4	8-10, 137, 138
D.	Consideration of a Liquidity Event	6	xi, xii
E.	Updates to the Questions and Answers About This Offering Section	6	ii, v, viii, x
F.	Updates to the Prospectus Summary Section	10	2
G.	Updates to the Risk Factors Section	10	9, 10, 13, 15-19, 23, 25-27, 30, 32, 33, 35
H.	Updates to the Management Section	16	39, 44, 49, 50, 52, 53, 58-63, 66
I.	Updates to the Management Compensation, Expense Reimbursements and Operating Partnership Participation Section	31	71
J.	Updates to Our Real Estate Investments Section	32	71-87, 91
K.	Updates to the Investment Objectives and Policies with Respect to Certain Activities Section	44	101, 104, 106-108
L.	Updates to the Selected Financial Data Section	46	110
M.	Updates to the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Section	63	111
N.	Updates to the Description of Capital Stock Section	63	136, 137
O.	Updates to the Plan of Distribution Section	64	149
P.	Updates to the Operating Partnership Section	64	151
Q.	Updates to the ERISA Considerations Section	65	175
R.	Updates to the Legal Proceedings Section	66	175
S.	Updates to the Reports to Shareholders Section	66	175
T.	Updates to the Experts Section	66	177
U.	Updates to the Incorporation by Reference Section	66	177
V.	Updates to the Financial Statements Section	67	F-1
W.	Appendix D - Hines History, Experience and Timeline	68	D-1

A.  Status of Our Current Public Offering

As of April 22, 2010, we had received gross proceeds of approximately $505.3 million from the sale of approximately 50.0 million of our common shares in our current public offering, including approximately $117.7 million relating to approximately 12.1 million shares issued under our dividend reinvestment plan. As of April 22, 2009, approximately $382.3 million in shares remained available under our dividend reinvestment plan (“DRP Shares”).

In consideration of market conditions and other factors, on November 30, 2009, our board of directors determined to cease new sales of primary offering shares and we have not accepted any subscriptions for such shares dated after December 31, 2009.  Our board of directors is considering various future capital raising strategies, and may resume capital raising in the future under a new primary offering.  Hines REIT will continue to sell the DRP Shares offered pursuant to the Prospectus.  The Prospectus and this Supplement should therefore be read in light of the fact that new sales of primary offering shares ceased after December 31, 2009, and only DRP Shares continue to be sold pursuant to the Prospectus.

3

B.  Distributions Authorized by Our Board of Directors and Change in the Distribution Rate

With the authorization of our board of directors, we have declared distributions for each of the months from May 2009 through April 2010. The May and June 2009 distributions were calculated based on shareholders of record each day during such months in an amount equal to $0.00175233 per share, per day. The distributions for the months of May and June 2009 were aggregated with our distributions from April 2009 and paid on July 1, 2009. The distributions for each of the months from July 2009 through April 2010 were calculated based on shareholders of record each day during such months in an amount equal to $0.00165699 per share, per day, which represents a decrease of $0.00009534 per share, per day compared to those declared in May and June 2009. The distributions for the months of July, August and September 2009 were paid in October 2009. The distributions for the months of October, November and December 2009 were paid in January 2010.  The distributions for the months of January, February and March 2010 were paid in April 2010.  Distributions for the month of April 2010 will be paid in July 2010. All distributions were or will be paid in cash or reinvested in stock for those participating in our dividend reinvestment plan.

C.  Modifications to Our Share Redemption Program

Our board of directors and our officers remain focused on carefully managing our cash position and maintaining appropriate levels of liquidity to meet our operating and capital needs in an environment where access to capital in the equity and debt markets remains constrained.  To that end, on November 30, 2009, our board of directors determined that it is in our best interest to suspend our share redemption program until further notice, except with respect to redemption requests made in connection with the death or disability (as defined in the Code) of a shareholder (referred to herein as “Special Redemption Requests”).  Special Redemption Requests will be considered for redemption by our board of directors on a quarterly basis, and the fulfillment of any Special Redemption Requests will be subject to the discretion of our board of directors in determining whether we have sufficient funds available for redemptions and will be subject to the other limitations of the share redemption program, as described below.

As a result of these changes, any reference to our share redemption program in the Prospectus is hereby updated to reflect that our share redemption program has been suspended until further notice, except with respect to Special Redemption Requests.  Further, any description of the terms of our share redemption program in the Prospectus should be read in conjunction with and is superseded by the following disclosure, which deletes and replaces the “Description of Capital Stock - Share Redemption Program” section of the Prospectus:

Share Redemption Program

Our shares are currently not listed on a national securities exchange and we currently do not intend to list our shares. In order to provide our shareholders with some liquidity, we instituted a share redemption program.   However, on November 30, 2009, our board of directors determined that it is in our best interest to suspend our share redemption program until further notice, except with respect to redemption requests made in connection with the death or disability (as defined in the Code) of a shareholder.  All unfunded requests for redemptions, which were not made in connection with the death or disability of a shareholder, were cancelled.  Such redemption requests may be resubmitted at such point in the future, if any, at which our board of directors determines to reopen our share redemption progr am.  Any such future redemption requests will be subject to the conditions and limitations of our share redemption program, as in effect if or when we recommence our general share redemption program.

Prior to the time, if any, as our shares are listed on a national securities exchange, subject to the conditions and limitations described herein, any shares that have been held by the shareholder for at least one year since the date of their acquisition, and were (i) purchased from us, (ii) received through a non-cash transaction, not in the secondary market or (iii) purchased from another shareholder prior to January 11, 2009, may be presented in whole or in part to us for redemption in connection with Special Redemption Requests.  In connection with such requests, we may, in our discretion, waive the one-year holding period requirement as well as the limitations on the number of shares that will be redeemed as summarized below.  In addition, in the event a shareholder is having all his shares redeemed, the one-year holding requirement will be waived for shares purchased under our dividend reinvestment plan. We will not pay the Advisor or its affiliates any fees to complete any transactions under our share redemption program.

    To the extent our board of directors determines that we have sufficient available cash flow for redemptions, we intend to redeem Special Redemption Requests for cash on a quarterly basis; however, our board of directors may determine from time to time to adjust the timing of redemptions upon 30 days’ notice, which will be provided in the form of a current report on Form 8-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and made available on our website (www.HinesREI.com).  Unless our board of directors determines otherwise, the funds available for redemption will be limited to the lesser of the amount required to redeem 10% of the shares outstanding as of the same date in the prior calendar year or the amount of proceeds received from our dividend reinvestment plan in t he prior quarter.

Our board of directors may terminate, suspend or amend our share redemption program and discontinue redemptions of Special Redemption Requests at any time upon 30 days’ written notice without shareholder approval if our directors believe such action is in our best interests, or if they determine the funds otherwise available to fund our share redemption program are needed for other purposes. The written notice will take the form of a current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC and made available on our website.

4

During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we redeemed $152.5 million, $58.7 million and $10.6 million in shares, respectively. During these years, all shareholder requests for redemptions were fully funded out of proceeds from our dividend reinvestment plan. During 2009, we experienced a significant increase in share redemptions, all of which were funded out of proceeds from our dividend reinvestment plan and our primary offering. Cash used to fund redemptions reduces our liquidity available to fund acquisitions of real estate investments and other cash needs. We cannot assure you that we will be able to fully fund Special Redemption Requests in the future.

Our current share redemption price for Special Redemption Requests is $9.15 per share. The redemption price was determined by our board of directors. Our board’s determination of the redemption price was subjective and was primarily based on our estimated per-share net asset value as determined by our management. Our management estimated our per-share net asset value using valuations of our real estate assets and notes payable as of December 31, 2008, which were determined by independent third parties (except for assets acquired within the last year for which we used aggregate cost). Management estimated the values of our other assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2008, and then made various adjustments and estimations in order to account for our operations and other factors occurring or expected to occur between December 31, 2008 and the effective date of this pricing change. In addition, our board of directors also considered our historical and anticipated results of operations and financial condition, our current and anticipated distribution payments, yields and offering prices of other real estate companies we deem to be substantially similar to us, our current and anticipated capital and debt structure, and our management’s and Advisor’s recommendations and assessment of our prospects and expected execution of our investment and operating strategies.

The valuations of our real estate assets and notes payable, as well as the methodology utilized by our management in estimating our per-share net asset value, were based on a number of assumptions and estimates that may not be accurate or complete. No liquidity discounts or discounts relating to the fact that we are currently externally managed were applied to our estimated per-share valuation, and no attempt was made to value Hines REIT as an enterprise. Likewise, the valuation was not reduced by potential selling commissions or other costs of sale, which would impact proceeds in the case of a liquidation. The redemption price may not be indicative of the price our shareholders could receive if they sold our shares, if our shares were actively traded or if we were liquidated.

Our board of directors may adjust the per-share redemption price for Special Redemption Requests from time to time upon 30 days’ written notice based on our then-current estimated per-share net asset value at the time of the adjustment, and such other factors as it deems appropriate, including the then-current offering price of our shares (if any) and the other factors described above, our then-current dividend reinvestment plan price and general market conditions. At any time we are engaged in an offering of shares, the per-share price for shares purchased under our redemption program will always be equal to or lower than the applicable per-share offering price. Real estate asset and notes payable values fluctuate, which in the future may result in an increase or decrease in our net asset value. Thus, future adjustments to our per - -share net asset value could result in a higher or lower redemption price. The members of our board of directors must, in accordance with their fiduciary duties, act in a manner they believe is in the best interests of our shareholders when making any decision to adjust the redemption price offered under our share redemption program. Our board of directors will announce any price adjustment and the time period of its effectiveness as a part of our regular communications with shareholders. Please see “Reports to Shareholders.”

All Special Redemption Requests must be made in writing and received by us at least five business days prior to the end of the quarter. You may also withdraw your request to have your shares redeemed. Withdrawal requests must also be made in writing and received by us at least five business days prior to the end of the quarter. If our board determines to redeem Special Redemption Requests for a particular quarter and the number of our shares subject to Special Redemption Requests exceeds the limitations described above, or our board of directors determines that available cash flow is insufficient to meet such requests, the Special Redemption Requests will be reduced on a pro rata basis. We cannot guarantee that we will accommodate all requests made in any quarter.  If we cannot accommodate all requests in a given quarter, you c an withdraw your Special Redemption Request or request in writing that we honor it in a successive quarter.  Such pending Special Redemption Requests will generally be honored on a pro-rata basis with any new Special Redemption Requests we receive in the applicable period.

Commitments by us to repurchase shares will be communicated either telephonically or in writing to each shareholder who submitted a Special Redemption Request at or promptly (no more than five business days) after the fifth business day following the end of each quarter. We will redeem the shares subject to these commitments, and pay the redemption price associated therewith, within three business days following the delivery of such commitments. You will not relinquish your shares until we redeem them. Please see “Risk Factors — Investment Risks — Your ability to have your shares redeemed is limited under our share redemption program, and if you are able to have your shares redeemed, it may be at a price that is less than the price you paid for the shares and the then-current market value of the shares....” and &# 8220;Risk Factors — Investment Risks — There is currently no public market for our common shares, and we do not intend to list the shares on a stock exchange. Therefore, it will likely be difficult for you to sell your shares and, if you are able to sell your shares, you will likely sell them at a substantial discount. The price of our common shares may be adjusted to a price less than the price you paid for your shares.”

5

The shares we redeem under our share redemption program will be cancelled and will have the status of authorized but unissued shares. We will not resell such shares to the public unless such sales are first registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act and under appropriate state securities laws or are exempt under such laws. We will terminate our share redemption program in the event that our shares ever become listed on a national securities exchange or in the event a secondary market for our common shares develops.

D.  Consideration of a Liquidity Event

As discussed on pages xi and xii of the Prospectus, our board may consider and authorize us to execute exit strategies at both the asset level and portfolio level, but only if any such exit strategy is deemed to be in our best interests. Due to the uncertainties of market conditions in the future, we believe setting finite dates for possible, but uncertain, liquidity events may result in actions that are not necessarily in the best interests or within the expectations of our shareholders. Therefore, we believe it is more appropriate to allow us and our board of directors the flexibility to consider multiple options at times that our board of directors deems appropriate.  Although we are not obligated to execute a particular liquidity event by a set date, we expect our board of directors may begin to consider possible exit strate gies for all or a portion of our portfolio between late 2015 and the end of 2019.  There can be no assurances that our board of directors will consider any such exit strategy, that we will successfully execute any exit strategy, or that any such exit strategy, if executed, will be beneficial to our shareholders.

The following is added to the end of the first paragraph under the heading “Disposition Policies” on page 106 of the Prospectus:

Although we are not obligated to sell any of our investments or execute a liquidity event by a set date, we expect that our board of directors may begin to consider possible liquidity events between late 2015 and the end of 2019. There can be no assurances that our board of directors will consider any such exit strategy, that we will successfully execute any exit strategy, or that any such exit strategy, if executed, will be beneficial to our shareholders.

E.  Updates to the Questions and Answers About This Offering Section

1.  The first four questions and answers beginning on page ii of the Prospectus are deleted in their entirety and replaced with the following disclosure:

Q:	What is Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., or Hines REIT?
A:	Hines REIT is a real estate investment trust, or “REIT,” that has invested and intends to continue to invest primarily in institutional-quality office properties located in the United States. In addition, we have invested and may invest in other real estate investments including, but not limited to, properties located outside of the United States, non-office properties, loans and ground leases.
	•We commenced operations in November 2004. As of April 22, 2010, we had raised almost $2.5 billion of gross proceeds through public offerings of our common shares, including gross proceeds of approximately $505.3 million from the sale of approximately 50.0 million shares of our common stock in this offering. As of April 22, 2010, approximately $382.3 million in shares remained available under our dividend reinvestment plan. We invest the net offering proceeds into our real estate investments, and, as of December 31, 2009, owned interests in 63 properties. These properties consist of 45 U.S. office properties, one mixed-use office and retail complex in Toronto, Ontario, one industrial property in Dallas, Texas, four industrial properties in Brazil and a portfolio of 12 grocery-anchored shopping centers located in five states in the southeastern United States. On January 22, 2010 we sold one industrial property located in Curitiba, Brazil and on April 22, 2010, we sold two industrial properties located in Sao Paulo, Brazil.
	•We are externally managed by our advisor, Hines Advisors Limited Partnership (our “Advisor”), which is responsible for identifying our investment opportunities and managing our day-to-day operations. Our advisor is an affiliate of our sponsor, Hines Interests Limited Partnership (“Hines”).
Q:	Who is Hines Interests Limited Partnership?
A:	Hines is a fully integrated global real estate investment and management firm and, with its predecessor, has been investing in real estate and providing acquisition, development, financing, property management, leasing and disposition services for over 50 years. Hines provides investment management services to numerous investors and partners including pension plans, domestic and foreign institutional investors, high net worth individuals and retail investors. Hines is owned and controlled by Gerald D. Hines and his son Jeffrey C. Hines. As of December 31, 2009, Hines and its affiliates had ownership interests in a real estate portfolio of 214 projects, valued at approximately $22.2 billion. Please see “Management — Hines and our Property Management and Leasing Agreements — The Hines Organization 221; for more information regarding Hines.

6

Q:	What competitive advantages does Hines REIT achieve through its relationship with Hines and its affiliates?
A:	We believe our relationship with Hines and its affiliates provides us the following benefits:
	•Global Presence — Our relationship with Hines and its affiliates as our sponsor, advisor and property manager allows us to have access to an organization that has extraordinary depth and breadth around the world with, as of December 31, 2009, approximately 3,450 employees (including approximately 1,200 employees outside of the United States) located in 65 cities across the United States and 16 foreign countries. This provides us a significant competitive advantage in drawing upon the experiences resulting from the vast and varied real estate cycles and strategies that varied economies and markets experience.
	•Local Market Expertise — Hines’ global platform is built from the ground up based on Hines’ philosophy that real estate is essentially a local business. Hines provides us access to a team of real estate professionals who live and work in individual major markets around the world. These regional and local teams are fully integrated to provide a full range of real estate investment and management services including sourcing investment opportunities, acquisitions, development, re-development, financing, property management, leasing, asset management, disposition, accounting and financial reporting.
	•Centralized Resources — Hines’ headquarters in Houston, Texas provides the regional and local teams with, as of December 31, 2009, a group of approximately 388 personnel who specialize in areas such as capital markets, corporate finance, construction, engineering, operations, marketing, human resources, cash management, risk management, tax and internal audit. These experienced personnel provide a repository of knowledge, experience and expertise and an important control point for preserving performance standards and maintaining operating consistency for the entire organization.
	•Tenure of Personnel — Hines has one of the most experienced executive management teams in the real estate industry with, as of December 31, 2008, an average tenure within the organization of 29 years. This executive team provides stability to the organization and provides experience through numerous real estate cycles during such time frame. This impressive record of tenure is attributable to a professional culture of quality and integrity and long-term compensation plans that align personal wealth creation with real estate and investor performance and value creation.
	•Long-Term Track Record — Hines has more than 50 years of experience in creating and successfully managing capital and real estate investments for numerous third-party investors. As stated above, as of December 31, 2009, Hines and its affiliates had approximately 3,450 employees (including approximately 1,200 employees outside of the United States) located in regional and local offices in 65 cities in the United States and in 16 foreign countries around the world. Since its inception in 1957, Hines, its predecessor and their respective affiliates have acquired or developed more than 895 real estate projects representing approximately 283 million square feet
	•Please see “Risk Factors — Potential Conflicts of Interest Risks” and “Conflicts of Interest” for a discussion of certain risks and potential disadvantages of our relationship with Hines.

* * * *

2.  The first sentence in the answer to the question “Why should I invest in office real estate?” on page v of the Prospectus is replaced in its entirety with the following:

Institutional investors have historically allocated a substantial portion of the real estate component of their investment portfolio to office real estate in an effort to obtain income and portfolio diversification.

* * * *

7

3.  The response to the question “What assets do you currently own?” beginning on page viii is replaced in its entirety with the following:

A:           Our portfolio consisted of the following assets at December 31, 2009:

Direct Investments

Property	City	Leasable Square Feet			Percent Leased			Our Effective Ownership(1)
321 North Clark	Chicago, Illinois		886,752			74	%		100	%
Distribution Park Araucaria	Curitiba, Brazil		459,587	(2)		100	%		100	%
Citymark	Dallas, Texas		218,695			95	%		100	%
4055/4055 Corporate Drive	Dallas, Texas		643,429			100	%		100	%
JPMorgan Chase Tower	Dallas, Texas		1,243,667			87	%		100	%
345 Inverness Drive	Denver, Colorado		175,284			100	%		100	%
Arapahoe Business Park	Denver, Colorado		309,450			74	%		100	%
Raytheon/DIRECTV Buildings	El Segundo, California		550,579			100	%		100	%
Watergate Tower IV	Emeryville, California		344,433			100	%		100	%
Williams Tower	Houston, Texas		1,480,623			82	%		100	%
2555 Grand	Kansas City, Missouri		595,607			100	%		100	%
One Wilshire	Los Angeles, California		661,553			97	%		100	%
3 Huntington Quadrangle	Melville, New York		407,731			83	%		100	%
Airport Corporate Center	Miami, Florida		1,021,397			86	%		100	%
Minneapolis Office/Flex Portfolio	Minneapolis, Minnesota		766,430			82	%		100	%
3400 Data Drive	Rancho Cordova, California		149,703			100	%		100	%
Daytona Buildings	Redmond, Washington		251,313			100	%		100	%
Laguna Buildings	Redmond, Washington		460,661			78	%		100	%
1515 S Street	Sacramento, California		349,185			100	%		100	%
1900 and 2000 Alameda	San Mateo, California		253,187			95	%		100	%
Distribution Park Elouveira	Sao Paolo, Brazil		534,794	(3)		100	%		100	%
Distribution Park Vinhedo	Sao Paolo, Brazil		609,474	(3)		100	%		100	%
Seattle Design Center	Seattle, Washington		390,684			81	%		100	%
5th and Bell	Seattle, Washington		197,135			98	%		100	%
Atrium on Bay	Toronto, Ontario		1,077,467			98	%		100	%
Total for Directly-Owned Properties			14,038,820			91	%
Indirect Investments
Core Fund One Atlantic Center	Atlanta, Georgia		1,100,312			76	%		23.20	%
The Carillon Building	Charlotte, North Carolina		471,507			77	%		23.20	%
Charlotte Plaza	Charlotte, North Carolina		625,026			93	%		23.20	%
One North Wacker	Chicago, Illinois		1,373,754			97	%		23.20	%
Three First National Plaza	Chicago, Illinois		1,423,353			89	%		18.56	%
333 West Wacker	Chicago, Illinois		853,243			77	%		18.51	%
One Shell Plaza	Houston, Texas		1,230,395			100	%		11.60	%
Two Shell Plaza	Houston, Texas		565,553			95	%		11.60	%
425 Lexington Avenue	New York, New York	��	700,034			100	%		11.67	%
499 Park Avenue	New York, New York		291,480			81	%		11.67	%
600 Lexington Avenue	New York, New York		289,386			94	%		11.67	%
Renaissance Square	Phoenix, Arizona		965,508			88	%		23.20	%
Riverfront Plaza	Richmond, Virginia		951,590			95	%		23.20	%
Johnson Ranch Corporate Centre	Roseville, California		179,990			45	%		18.51	%
Roseville Corporate Center	Roseville, California		111,418			76	%		18.51	%
Summit at Douglas Ridge	Roseville, California		185,128			62	%		18.51	%
Olympus Corporate Centre	Roseville, California		193,178			54	%		18.51	%
Douglas Corporate Center	Roseville, California		214,606			76	%		18.51	%
Wells Fargo Center	Sacramento, California		502,365			96	%		18.51	%

8

Property	City	Leasable Square Feet		Percent Leased			Our Effective Ownership(1)
Indirect Investments
525 B Street	San Diego, California		449,183		94	%		23.20	%
The KPMG Building	San Francisco, California		379,328		100	%		23.20	%
101 Second Street	San Francisco, California		388,370		83	%		23.20	%
720 Olive Way	Seattle, Washington		300,710		80	%		18.51	%
1200 19th Street	Washington, D.C.		337,239		60	%		11.67	%
Warner Center	Woodland Hills, California		808,274		90	%		18.51	%
Total for Core Fund Properties			14,890,930		88	%
Grocery-Anchored Portfolio
Bellaire Boulevard Center	Bellaire, Texas		35,081		97	%		70	%
Champions Village	Houston, Texas		384,581		91	%		70	%
King’s Crossing	Kingwood, Texas		126,397		97	%		70	%
Oak Park Village	San Antonio, Texas		64,287		100	%		70	%
Cherokee Plaza	Atlanta, Georgia		99,749		100	%		70	%
University Palms Shopping Center	Oviedo, Florida		99,172		88	%		70	%
Commons at Dexter Lakes	Memphis, Tennessee		228,496		94	%		70	%
Mendenhall Commons	Memphis, Tennessee		79,871		99	%		70	%
Thompson Bridge Commons	Gainsville, Georgia		92,587		95	%		70	%
Sandy Plains Exchange	Marietta, Georgia		72,784		95	%		70	%
Shoppes at Parkland	Parkland, Florida		145,652		93	%		70	%
Heritage Station	Wake Forest, North Carolina		68,641		87	%		70	%
Total for Grocery-Anchored Portfolio			1,497,298		94	%		70	%
Other
Distribution Park Rio(4)	Rio de Janeiro, Brazil		693,115		99	%		50	%
Total for All Properties			31,120,163		90	%(5)

____________

(1)	This percentage shows the effective ownership of the Operating Partnership in the properties listed. On December 31, 2009, Hines REIT owned a 96.7% interest in the Operating Partnership as its sole general partner. Affiliates of Hines owned the remaining 3.3% interest in the Operating Partnership. In addition, we owned an approximate 28.7% non-managing general partner interest in the Core Fund as of December 31, 2009. The Core Fund does not own 100% of its properties; its ownership interest in its properties ranges from 40.3% to 80.7%.
(2)	This property was sold on January 22, 2010 for $38.4 million (69.9 million BRL translated at a rate of 1.818 BRL per $1 USD).
(3)	These properties were sold on April 22, 2010 for an aggregate price of $102.5 million (181.0 million BRL translated at a rate of 1.765 BRL per $1 USD).
(4)	We own a 50% indirect interest in Distribution Park Rio, an industrial property located in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, through a joint venture with Hines Calpers Brazil (“HCB”), an affiliate of Hines. We formed the joint venture in June 2007 with an initial investment of $28.9 million.
(5)	This amount represents the percentage leased assuming we own a 100% interest in each of these properties. The percentage leased based on our effective ownership interest in each property is 90%.

* * * *

4.  The first sentence of the answer to the question “Why do you invest in the Core Fund?” on page x of the Prospectus is deleted and replaced with the following:

The Core Fund has preferential rights to invest in high quality Class A office properties in the United States.

* * * *

9

5.  The last bullet point in the answer to the question “What investment or ownership interests does Hines or any of its affiliates have in the Company?” on page x is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

•an interest in the Operating Partnership, which is adjusted monthly in a manner intended to approximate the economic equivalent of the reinvestment by Hines of what would otherwise be cash payments of acquisition fees and asset management fees. As of December 31, 2009, the fair value of this participation interest in the Operating Partnership represented approximately $57.8 million. Please see “The Operating Partnership — The Participation Interest” for a description of this interest.

* * * *

6.  The questions “How can I have my shares redeemed?” and “What is your current share redemption price?” on page xi are deleted in their entirety and replaced with the following:

Q.  Will I have an opportunity to have my shares redeemed?

A. Our shares redemption program has been suspended, other than in connection with death or disability. Shares that are eligible for redemption may be redeemed at a price of $9.15 per share. Our board of directors may change this redemption price from time to time and may otherwise amend, further suspend or terminate our share redemption program at any time upon at least 30 days’ notice which notice shall be in the form of a report on Form 8-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and made available on our website (www.HinesREI.com).

* * * *

7.  The answer to the question “Will I be notified of how my investment is doing?” on page xii of the Prospectus is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

A:	Yes, periodic updates on the performance of your investment will be made available to you, including:
	•distribution statements;
	•periodic prospectus supplements during the offering;
	•an annual report;
	•an annual IRS Form 1099-DIV, if required; and
	•three quarterly financial reports.
	We will make this information available to you via one or more of the following methods:
	•electronic delivery; or
	•posting on our web site, located at www.hinesrei.com, along with any required notice.
	In addition, to the extent required by law or regulation or, in our discretion, we may make certain of this information available to you via U.S. mail or other courier.

F.  Update to the Prospectus Summary Section

The disclosure under the heading “Our Structure” on page 2 of the Prospectus is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

The following chart illustrates our general structure and our management relationship with Hines and its affiliates as of December 31, 2009:

G.  Updates to the Risk Factors Section

1.  The first two risk factors beginning on page 9 of the Prospectus are deleted in their entirety and replaced with the following:

There is currently no public market for our common shares, and we do not intend to list the shares on a stock exchange. Therefore, it will likely be difficult for you to sell your shares and, if you are able to sell your shares, you will likely sell them at a substantial discount. The price of our common shares may be adjusted to a price less than the price you paid for your shares.

10

There is no public market for our common shares, and we do not expect one to develop. We currently have no plans to list our shares on a national securities exchange or over-the-counter market, or to include our shares for quotation on any national securities market. Additionally, our charter contains restrictions on the ownership and transfer of our shares, and these restrictions may inhibit your ability to sell your shares. We have a share redemption program, but it is limited in terms of the amount of shares that may be redeemed and is currently open only to requests made in connection with the death or disability (as defined in the Code) of a shareholder. Our board of directors may further limit, suspend or terminate our share redemption program upon 30 days’ written notice, in the form of a current report on Form 8-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and made available on our website (www.HinesREI.com). It may be difficult for you to sell your shares promptly or at all. If you are able to sell your shares, you may only be able to sell them at a substantial discount from the price you paid. This may be the result, in part, of the fact that the amount of funds available for investment are reduced by funds used to pay selling commissions, the dealer manager fee and acquisition fees in connection with our public offerings. Unless our aggregate investments increase in value to compensate for these up-front fees and expenses, which may not occur, it is unlikely that you will be able to sell your shares, whether pursuant to our share redemption program or otherwise, without incurring a substantial loss. You may also experience substantial losses in connection with a liquidation event or if we dispose of our assets. We cannot assure you that your shares will ever appreciate in value to equal th e price you paid for your shares. Thus, shareholders should consider our common shares as illiquid and a long-term investment, and you must be prepared to hold your shares for an indefinite length of time. Further, the price of our shares may be adjusted periodically to reflect changes in our net asset value as well as other factors, including changes in fees and expenses and therefore future adjustments may result in an offering price lower than the price you paid for your shares and a redemption price lower than our current redemption price. We reduced the price of our shares effective January 26, 2009 and our redemption price effective March 1, 2009. Please see “Description of Capital Stock — Restrictions on Transfer” herein for a more complete discussion on certain restrictions regarding your ability to transfer your shares.

Our share redemption program is currently suspended, except with respect to requests made in connection with the death or disability of a shareholder. We do not know when or if our general share redemption program will be resumed. Your ability to have your shares redeemed is subject to additional limitations under our share redemption program, and if you are able to have your shares redeemed, it may be at a price that is less than the price you paid for the shares and the then-current market value of the shares. Unless our board of directors determines otherwise, funds available for redemption will be limited to the lesser of the amount required to redeem 10% of the shares outstanding as of the same date in the prior calendar year or the amount of proceeds received from our dividend reinvestment p lan in the prior quarter. Cash used to fund redemptions may reduce our liquidity available to fund acquisitions of real estate investments and other cash needs.

You should understand that our share redemption program contains significant restrictions and limitations, and

is currently open only to requests made in connection with the death or disability (as defined in the Code) of a shareholder. We do not know when or if our general share redemption program will be resumed. In addition, irrespective of the amount of time you have held your securities, only the following shares are currently eligible for redemption in connection with the death or disability of a shareholder: (i) shares purchased directly from us, (ii) shares received through a non-cash transaction, not in the secondary market and (iii) shares purchased from another shareholder prior to January 11, 2009. Subject to the restrictions and limitations of our share redemption program, we expect to redeem shares to the extent our board of directors determines we have sufficient available cash to do so. Please see “Description of Capital S tock — Share Redemption Program.”

Unless our board of directors determines otherwise, the funds available for redemption will be limited to the lesser of the amount required to redeem 10% of the shares outstanding as of the same date in the prior calendar year or proceeds received from our dividend reinvestment plan in the prior quarter. Cash used to fund redemptions reduces our liquidity available to fund acquisitions of real estate investments and other cash needs.

Our board of directors reserves the right to further amend, suspend or terminate the share redemption program at any time in its discretion upon 30 days’ written notice, in the form of a current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC and made available on our website. Shares for which requests to redeem are made in connection with the death or disability of a shareholder are currently redeemed at a price of $9.15 per share. However, our board of directors may change the redemption price from time to time upon 30 days’ written notice based on our then-current estimated net asset value at the time of the adjustment and such other factors as it deems appropriate, including the then-current offering price of our shares (if any), our then-current dividend reinvestment plan price and general market conditions. The methodology use d in determining the redemption price is subject to a number of limitations and to a number of assumptions and estimates which may not be accurate or complete. The redemption price may not be indicative of the price our shareholders would receive if our shares were actively traded, if we were liquidated or if they otherwise sold their shares. Therefore, in making a decision to purchase common shares, you should not assume that you will be able to sell all or any portion of your shares back to us pursuant to our share redemption program or at a price that reflects the then-current market value of the shares.

* * * *

11

2.  The following disclosure is added immediately following the third bullet point under the risk factor “Due to the risks involved in the ownership of real estate, there is no guarantee of any return on your investment in Hines REIT, and you may lose some or all of your investment” on page 10 of the Prospectus, as one of the factors that could affect income from properties, our ability to sell properties and yields from investments in properties and are generally outside of our control:

• changes to existing environmental regulation to address, among other things, climate change.

* * * *

3.  The disclosure under the risk factor “Hines REIT’s interest in the Operating Partnership will be diluted by the Participation Interest in the Operating Partnership held by HALP Associates Limited Partnership, and your interest in Hines REIT may be diluted if we issue additional shares” on page 13 of the Prospectus is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

Hines REIT owned a 96.7% general partner interest in the Operating Partnership as of December 31, 2009. An affiliate of Hines, HALP Associates Limited Partnership owns a Participation Interest in the Operating Partnership, which was issued as consideration for an obligation by Hines and its affiliates to perform future services in connection with our real estate operations. This interest in the Operating Partnership, as well as the number of shares into which it may be converted, increases on a monthly basis. As of December 31, 2009, the percentage interest in the Operating Partnership attributable to the Participation Interest was 2.8%, and such interest was convertible into 6.3 million common shares, subject to the fulfillment of certain conditions. The Participation Interest will increase to the extent leverage is us ed because the use of leverage will allow us to acquire more assets. Please see “The Operating Partnership — The Participation Interest” for a summary of this interest. Each increase in this interest will dilute your indirect investment in the Operating Partnership and, accordingly, reduce the amount of distributions that would otherwise be payable to you in the future. Please see “The Operating Partnership — Hypothetical Impact of the Participation Interest.”

Additionally, shareholders do not have preemptive rights to acquire any shares issued by us in the future. Therefore, investors purchasing our common shares in this offering may experience dilution of their equity investment if we:

• sell shares in this offering or sell additional shares in the future, including those issued pursuant to the dividend reinvestment plan and shares issued to our officers and directors or employees of the Advisor and its affiliates under our Employee and Director Incentive Share Plan;

• sell or issue securities that are convertible into shares, such as interests in the Operating Partnership;

• issue shares in a private offering;

• issue common shares to the Advisor or affiliates in lieu of any cash fees;

• issue common shares upon the exercise of options granted, if any, to our independent directors, or employees of the Company or the Advisor; or

• issue shares to sellers of properties acquired by us in connection with an exchange of partnership units from the Operating Partnership.

* * * *

4.  The third paragraph under the risk factor “If Hines REIT, the Operating Partnership or the Core Fund is required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act, the additional expenses and operational limitations associated with such registration may reduce your investment return or impair our ability to conduct our business as planned” that begins on page 15 of the Prospectus is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following disclosure:

We have received an opinion from our counsel, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, dated November 24, 2009 that is based on certain assumptions and representations and taking into consideration our current assets and the percentage which could be deemed “investment securities,” as of the date of the opinion, we were not an investment company.

* * * *

5.  The disclosure under the risk factor “The ownership limit in our charter may discourage a takeover attempt” on page 16 of the Prospectus is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

 Our charter provides that no holder of shares, other than Hines, affiliates of Hines or any other person to whom our board of directors grants an exemption, may directly or indirectly own more than 9.9% in value of the aggregate of our outstanding shares or more than 9.9% of the number or value, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of any class or series of our outstanding securities.

12

This ownership limit may deter tender offers for our outstanding shares, which offers may be attractive to our shareholders, and thus may limit the opportunity for shareholders to receive a premium for their shares that might otherwise exist if an investor attempted to assemble a block of common shares in excess of 9.9% in value of the aggregate of our outstanding shares or more than 9.9% of the number or value, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of any class or series or otherwise to effect a change of control in us. Please see the “Description of Capital Stock — Restrictions on Transfer” section of this prospectus for additional information regarding the restrictions on transfer of our common shares.

* * * *

6. The first bullet point under the risk factor “We will not be afforded the protection of the Maryland General Corporation Law relating to business combinations” that begins on page 16 of the Prospectus is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

• any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power of our outstanding voting stock (an “interested shareholder”);

* * * *

7.  The disclosure under the risk factor on page 17 of the Prospectus “Any indirect investment we make will be consistent with the investment objectives and policies described in this prospectus and will, therefore, be subject to similar business and real estate risks. The Core Fund, which has investment objectives and policies similar to ours, is subject to many of the same business and real estate risks as we are” is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

For example, the Core Fund:

• will be affected by general economic and regulatory factors it cannot control or predict;

• depends on its tenants for its revenue and relies on certain significant tenants;

• may not have funding or capital resources for future tenant improvements;

• also operates in a competitive business with competitors who have significant financial resources and operational flexibility;

• will make illiquid investments and be subject to general economic and regulatory factors, including environmental laws, which it cannot control or predict; 

• will be subject to property taxes and operating expenses that may increase;

• is subject to risks as a result of joint ownership of real estate with Hines and other Hines programs or third parties;

• is also dependent upon Hines and its key employees for its success;

• is subject to risks associated with terrorism, uninsured losses and high insurance costs; and

• used borrowings and leverage, which may result in foreclosures and unexpected debt-service requirements and indirectly negatively affect our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders;

To the extent the operations and ability of the Core Fund, or any other entity through which we indirectly invest in real estate, to make distributions is adversely affected by any of these risks, our operations and ability to pay distributions to you will be adversely affected.

* * * *

8.  The first two full risk factors on page 18 of the Prospectus are deleted in their entirety and replaced with the following:

Geographic concentration of our portfolio may make us particularly susceptible to adverse economic developments in the real estate markets of those areas.

In the event that we have a concentration of real estate investments in a particular geographic area, our operating results and ability to make distributions are likely to be impacted by economic changes affecting the real estate markets in that area. Your investment will be subject to greater risk to the extent that we lack a geographically diversified portfolio of properties. For example, based on our pro-rata share of the market value of the real estate investments in which we owned interests as of December 31, 2009, approximately 12% of our portfolio consists of properties located in Los Angeles, 12% of our portfolio consists of properties located in Chicago and 10% of our portfolio consists of properties located in Houston. Consequently, our financial condition and ability to make distributions could be materially and advers ely affected by any significant adverse developments in those markets.

13

Industry concentration of our tenants may make us particularly susceptible to adverse economic developments in these industries.

In the event we have a concentration of tenants in a particular industry, our operating results and ability to make distributions may be adversely affected by adverse developments in these industries and we will be subject to a greater risk to the extent that our tenants are not diversified by industry. For example, based on our pro rata share of space leased to tenants as of December 31, 2009, 19% of our space is leased to tenants in the manufacturing industry, 15% is leased to tenants in the finance and insurance industries, 15% is leased to tenants in the legal industry and 10% is leased to tenants in the information and technology industries.

* * * *

9.  The disclosure under the risk factor “If we purchase assets at a time when the commercial real estate market is experiencing substantial influxes of capital investment and competition for properties, the real estate we purchase may not appreciate or may decrease in value” beginning on page 18 of the Prospectus is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

During various cycles, the commercial real estate market has experienced a substantial influx of capital from investors. This substantial flow of capital, combined with significant competition for real estate, may have resulted in inflated purchase prices for such assets. We and the Core Fund have recently purchased assets in such environments, and to the extent either of us purchases real estate in the future in such an environment, and therefore, we are subject to the risks that the value of our assets may not appreciate or may decrease significantly below the amount we paid for such assets if the real estate market ceases to attract the same level of capital investment in the future as it has recently attracted, or if the number of companies seeking to acquire such assets decreases. If any of these circumstances occur or the values of our investments are otherwise negatively affected, the value of your investment may be lower.

* * * *

10.  The last line of the second paragraph under the risk factor “We may need to incur borrowings that would otherwise not be incurred to meet minimum REIT distribution requirements” and the five bullet points that follow that line on page 19 of the Prospectus are hereby deleted in their entirety.

* * * *

11.  The disclosure under the risk factor “The failure of any bank in which we deposit our funds could reduce the amount of cash we have available to pay distributions and make additional investments” on page 23 of the Prospectus is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or FDIC, only insures amounts up to $250,000 per depositor per insured bank, until January 2014, when it will revert back to $100,000 per depositor per insured bank. We currently have cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash deposited in certain financial institutions in excess of federally insured levels. If any of the banking institutions in which we have deposited funds ultimately fails, we may lose any amount of our deposits over these amounts. The loss of our deposits could reduce the amount of cash we have available to distribute or invest and could result in a decline in the value of an investment in our shares.

* * * *

12.  The following disclosure is added immediately after the third bullet point under the risk factor “Our operations will be directly affected by general economic and regulatory factors we cannot control or predict” beginning on page 25 of the Prospectus, as one of the factors we cannot control or predict that may affect our operations:

• the potential effects, if any, of climate change;

* * * *

13.  The last sentence of the second paragraph under the risk factor “Volatility in debt markets could impact future acquisitions and values of real estate assets potentially reducing cash available for distribution to our shareholders” on page 26 of the Prospectus is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

Although this may benefit us for future acquisitions, it has negatively impacted the current value of our existing assets and could make it more difficult for us to sell any of our investments at attractive prices if we were to determine to do so.

* * * *

14.  The disclosure is under the risk factor “We may have difficulty selling real estate investments, and our ability to distribute all or a portion of the net proceeds from such sale to our shareholders may be limited” on page 26 of the Prospectus is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

14

Equity real estate investments are relatively illiquid. We will have a limited ability to vary our portfolio in response to changes in economic or other conditions. We will also have a limited ability to sell assets in order to fund working capital and similar capital needs such as share redemptions. We expect to generally hold a property for the long term. When we sell any of our properties, we may not realize a gain on such sale or the amount of our taxable gain could exceed the cash proceeds we receive from such sale. We may not distribute any proceeds from the sale of properties to our shareholders; for example, we may use such proceeds to:

•  purchase additional properties;

•  repay debt;

•  buy out interests of any co-venturers or other partners in any joint venture in which we are a party;

•  purchase shares under our share redemption program;

• fund distributions;

•  create working capital reserves; or

•  make repairs, maintenance, tenant improvements or other capital improvements or expenditures to our other properties.

Our ability to sell our properties may also be limited by our need to avoid a 100% penalty tax that is imposed on gain recognized by a REIT from the sale of property characterized as dealer property. In order to avoid such characterization and to take advantage of certain safe harbors under the Code, we may determine to hold our properties for a minimum period of time, generally two years.

* * * *

15.  The first sentence of the third paragraph under the risk factor “Potential liability as the result of, and the cost of compliance with, environmental matters could adversely affect our operations” on page 27 of the Prospectus is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

Environmental laws, including any changes to existing environmental laws to address climate change, also may impose restrictions on the manner in which properties may be used or businesses may be operated, and these restrictions may require expenditures.

* * * *

16.  The title of the first risk factor under the heading “Potential Conflicts of Interest Risks” on page 30 of the Prospectus is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

We compete with affiliates of Hines for real estate investment opportunities. Some of these affiliates have preferential rights to accept or reject certain investment opportunities in advance of our right to accept or reject such opportunities.

* * * *

17. The first sentence under the risk factor “Certain of our officers and directors face conflicts of interest relating to the positions they hold with other entities” on page 32 of the Prospectus is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

Certain of our officers and directors are also officers and directors of the Advisor and other entities controlled by Hines such as the managing general partner of the Core Fund or the Advisor of Hines Global REIT, Inc.

* * * *

18. The second paragraph under the risk factor “If we fail to qualify as a REIT, our operations and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders would be adversely impacted” on page 33 of the Prospectus is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

Investments in foreign real property may be subject to foreign currency gains and losses. Generally, foreign currency gains will be excluded from income for purposes of determining our satisfaction of the REIT gross revenue tests; however, under certain circumstances (for example, if we regularly trade in foreign securities) such gains will be treated as non-qualifying income. To reduce the risk of foreign currency gains adversely affecting our REIT qualification, we may be required to defer the repatriation of cash from foreign jurisdictions or to employ other structures that could affect the timing, character or amount of income we receive from our foreign investments. No assurance can be given that we will be able to manage our foreign currency gains in a manner that enables us to qualify as a REIT or to avoid U.S. federal and other taxes on our income as a result of foreign currency gains.

* * * *

15

19.  The title of the third risk factor on page 35 of the Prospectus is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

Entities through which we hold foreign real estate investments will, in most cases, be subject to foreign taxes, notwithstanding our status as a REIT.

H.  Updates to the Management Section

1. The disclosure under “Management — Our Officers and Directors” beginning on page 39 of the Prospectus is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

Other than our independent directors, each of our officers and directors is affiliated with Hines and subject to conflicts of interest. Please see “Conflicts of Interest” and “Risk Factors — Potential Conflicts of Interest Risks.” As described below, because of the inherent conflicts of interest existing as the result of these relationships, our independent directors will monitor the performance of all Hines affiliates performing services for us, and these board members have a fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of our Company in connection with our relationships with Hines affiliates. However, we cannot assure you that our independent directors will be successful in eliminating, or decreasing the impact of the risks resulting from, the conflicts of interest we face with Hines and its affilia tes. Indeed, our independent directors will not monitor or approve all decisions made by Hines that impact us, such as the allocation of investment opportunities.

The following sets forth information about our directors and executive officers:

Name	Age	Position and Office with Hines REIT
Jeffrey C. Hines	54	Chairman of the Board of Directors
C. Hastings Johnson	61	Director
Charles M. Baughn	55	Director
George A. Davis	71	Independent Director
Thomas A. Hassard	59	Independent Director
Stanley D. Levy	46	Independent Director
Paul B. Murphy Jr.	50	Independent Director
Charles N. Hazen	49	President and Chief Executive Officer
Sherri W. Schugart	44	Chief Financial Officer
Edmund A. Donaldson	40	Chief Investment Officer
Frank R. Apollo	43	Senior Vice President — Finance, Treasurer and Secretary
Kevin L. McMeans	45	Asset Management Officer
Ryan T. Sims	38	Chief Accounting Officer

Jeffrey C. Hines.  Mr. Hines joined Hines in 1981. He has served as the Chairman of our board of directors, as Chairman of the managers of the general partner of our Advisor, and as a member of the management board of the Core Fund since August 2003. Mr. Hines has also been the Chairman of the board of directors of Hines Global REIT, Inc., which we refer to as Hines Global, and Chairman of the managers of the general partner of the advisor of Hines Global since December 2008. He is also the co-owner and President and Chief Executive Officer of the general partner of Hines and is a member of Hines’ Executive Committee. Mr. Hines is responsible for overseeing all firm policies and procedures as well as day-to-day operations. He became President in 19 90 and Chief Executive Officer in January 2008 and has overseen a major expansion of the firm’s personnel, financial resources, domestic and foreign market penetration, products and services. He has been a major participant in the development of the Hines domestic and international acquisition program that secured more than $2.0 billion in properties and currently oversees a portfolio of 214 projects valued at approximately $22.2 billion. Over the past ten years, Hines has sponsored funds which acquired or developed $19.7 billion in real estate, $6.9 billion of which related to properties outside of the United States. Mr. Hines graduated from Williams College with a B.A. in Economics and received his M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.

We believe that Mr. Hines’ career, spanning more than 29 years in the commercial real estate industry, including his service as Chairman of our board of directors, his leadership of Hines and the depth of his knowledge of Hines and its affiliates, qualifies him to serve on our board of directors.

C. Hastings Johnson.  Mr. Johnson joined Hines in 1978. He has served as a member of our board of directors, as a member of the managers of the general partner of our Advisor, and as a member of the management board of the Core Fund since July 2004. Mr. Johnson has also been a member of the board of directors of Hines Global and a member of the managers of the general partner of the advisor of Hines Global since December 2008. In addition, he has served as Vice Chairman of the general partner of Hines since January 2008 and Chief Financial Officer of the general partner of Hines since 1992. In these roles, he is responsible for the financial policies,

16

equity financing and the joint venture relationships of Hines in the U.S. and internationally. He is also a member of Hines’ Executive Committee. Prior to becoming Chief Financial Officer of the general partner of Hines, he led the development or redevelopment of numerous projects and initiated the Hines domestic and international acquisition program and currently oversees a portfolio of 214 projects valued at approximately $22.2 billion.  Over the past ten years, Hines has sponsored funds which acquired or developed $19.7 billion in real estate, $6.9 billion of which related to properties outside of the United States. Total debt and equity capital committed to equity projects sponsored by Hines during Mr. Johnson’s tenure as Chief Financial Officer has exceeded $46 billion. Mr. Johnson graduated from the Georgia Institute of Technology with a B.S. in Industrial Engineering and received his M.B.A . from the Harvard Business School.

We believe that Mr. Johnson’s significant experience in the commercial real estate industry, including his 32 year tenure at Hines and his vast knowledge of Hines’ financial and investment policies, qualifies him to serve on our board of directors.

Charles M. Baughn.  Mr. Baughn has served as a member of our board of directors since April 2008 and as a manager of the general partner of our Advisor since August 2003. He served as Chief Executive Officer for us and the general partner of our Advisor from August 2003 through April 1, 2008. In addition, Mr. Baughn has been a member of the board of directors of Hines Global and a manager of the general partner of the advisor of Hines Global since December 2008. He has also served as an Executive Vice President and CEO — Capital Markets Group of the general partner of Hines since April 2001 and, as such, is responsible for overseeing Hines’ capital markets group, which raises, places and manages equity and debt for Hines projects, a memb er of Hines’ Executive Committee and the Chief Executive Officer and a director of our Dealer Manager. Mr. Baughn is also a member of the management board of the Core Fund. Mr. Baughn joined Hines in 1984. During his tenure at Hines, he has contributed to the development or redevelopment of over nine million square feet of office and special use facilities in the southwestern United States. He graduated from the New York State College of Ceramics at Alfred University with a B.A. and received his M.B.A. from the University of Colorado. Mr. Baughn holds Series 7, 24 and 63 securities licenses.

We believe that Mr. Baughn’s experience in the commercial real estate industry during his 26 year career with Hines, including his familiarity with Hines’ financial and investment policies, qualifies him to serve on our board of directors.

George A. Davis.  Mr. Davis, an independent director since June 2004, is the founder and sole owner of Advisor Real Estate Investment Ltd., a real estate consulting company unaffiliated with our Advisor. Prior to founding Advisor Real Estate Investment Ltd. in April 1999, he served as the Chief Real Estate Investment Officer for the New York State Teacher’s Retirement System (“NYSTRS”) reporting directly to the Executive Director of the system. In addition, Mr. Davis also served as a member of the Investment Committee, which ultimately determined the real estate investment strategy undertaken by NYSTRS. Mr. Davis graduated from Dartmouth College with a B.A. in Biology.

We believe that the extensive real estate investment experience Mr. Davis acquired through his roles as founder and owner of his real estate consulting company and his role as Chief Real Estate Investment Officer for NYTRS qualifies him to serve on our board of directors.

Thomas A. Hassard.  Mr. Hassard, an independent director since June 2004, served as the Managing Director for Real Estate Investments for the Virginia Retirement System for almost 20 years before retiring in December 2004. His responsibilities included managing the real estate investments of the system, monitoring performance and reporting to the system’s investment advisory committee and board of trustees. From 2004 through 2006, Mr. Hassard served on the board of directors of Strategic Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (f/k/a Strategic Hotel Capital, Inc.), a public company that owns and asset manages upscale and luxury hotels that are subject to long-term management contracts. Mr. Hassard graduated from Western New England College with a B.S. in Busine ss Administration.

We believe that the significant experience in real estate investing Mr. Hassard acquired during his almost 20 year tenure as the Managing Director for Real Estate Investments for the Virginia Retirement System qualifies him to serve on our board of directors.

Stanley D. Levy.  Mr. Levy, an independent director since June 2004, currently serves as Chief Risk Officer of Community Bancorp, a venture formed to purchase failed banks from the FDIC. Mr. Levy’s responsibilities include oversight of credit origination and loan management. Mr. Levy joined Community Bancorp in March 2010. Prior to joining Community Bancorp, Mr. Levy served for 9 years as Chief Operating Officer of The Morgan Group, Inc., a national multi-family development and management firm based in Houston. His responsibilities include arranging debt and equity financing, managing the property acquisition and disposition process, and oversight of all financial aspects of the firm and its projects. Prior to joining The Morgan Group, Mr. Levy spent 15 years with JPMorgan Chase, most recently, as Managing Director of Real Estate and Lodging Investment Banking for the Southern Region. In this capacity, he managed client activities in a variety of investment banking and financing transactions. Mr. Levy graduated with honors from the University of Texas with a B.B.A. in Finance. He also serves on the Board of Directors of the Emery/Weiner School. We believe that Mr. Levy’s current position as Chief Operating Officer of a national real estate firm, as well as his extensive real estate investment banking background, qualify him to serve on our board of directors.

17

We believe that Mr. Levy’s current position as Chief Risk Officer of Community Bancorp with responsibilities including credit approval and oversight of loan management, as well as his role at JPMorgan Chase which included oversight of all financial operations, accounting and capital markets as well as his involvement in the financing, acquisitions and sales of all real estate, qualify him to serve on our board of directors.

Paul B. Murphy Jr.  Mr. Murphy, an independent director since April 2008, currently serves as Chief Executive Officer of Amegy Bank of Texas (formerly known as Southwest Bank of Texas). Mr. Murphy began his banking career at Allied Bank of Texas in 1981 and joined Amegy Bank in 1990 as an Executive Vice President. With little more than $50 million in assets and one location 17 years ago, Amegy Bank now has more than $11 billion in assets, nearly 1,900 employees, and more than 85 banking centers throughout the greater Houston, Dallas and San Antonio metropolitan areas. Mr. Murphy became President in 1996 and CEO in 2000. He serves on the boards of the Houston Endowment, St. Luke’s Episcopal Health Care System, Greater Housto n Community Foundation, Greater Houston Partnership and Children’s Museum of Houston. He received his bachelor degree in finance from Mississippi State University and his M.B.A. from the University of Texas at Austin.

We believe that Mr. Murphy’s extensive financial background, including his leadership of Amegy Bank of Texas, qualifies him to serve on our board of directors.

Charles N. Hazen.  Mr. Hazen joined Hines in September 1989. Mr. Hazen has served as our President and as President of the general partner of our Advisor since August 2003 and is responsible for overall management of our business strategy and operations. Mr. Hazen has also been the President and Chief Executive Officer for Hines Global and the general partner of the advisor for Hines Global since December 2008. He also served as Chief Operating Officer for us and the general partner of the Advisor from August 2003 to April 1, 2008 when he became Chief Executive Officer for us and the general partner of our Advisor. He has also been a Senior Vice President of the general partner of Hines since July 2000, the President and a member of the management b oard of the Core Fund since July 2004 and a director of our Dealer Manager since August 2003. During his tenure at Hines, Mr. Hazen has participated in more than $9 billion of office, retail and industrial investments in the U.S. and abroad including Hines Corporate Properties, a $700 million fund that developed and acquired single-tenant office buildings in the U.S. Mr. Hazen graduated from the University of Kentucky with a B.S. in Finance and received his J.D. from the University of Kentucky.

Sherri W. Schugart.  Ms. Schugart joined Hines in 1995. She has served as our Chief Financial Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the general partner of our Advisor since August 2003 and as the Chief Financial Officer of the Core Fund since July 2004. In these roles, her responsibilities include oversight of our financial and portfolio management, equity and debt financing activities, investor relations, accounting, financial reporting, compliance and administrative functions. Ms. Schugart has also served as Chief Financial Officer for Hines Global and the general partner of the advisor for Hines Global since December 2008. She has also been a Senior Vice President of the general partner of Hines since October 2007 and has served as a director of our D ealer Manager since August 2003. Ms. Schugart has been responsible for arranging more than $8.0 billion in equity and debt for Hines’ public and private investment funds. She was also previously the controller for several of Hines’ private investment funds and portfolios. Prior to joining Hines, Ms. Schugart spent eight years with Arthur Andersen, where she managed both public and private clients in the real estate, construction, finance and banking industries. She graduated from Southwest Texas State University with a B.B.A. in Accounting.

    Edmund A. Donaldson. Mr. Donaldson joined Hines in 1994. Since April 2008, he has served as the Chief Investment Officer for us and the general partner of our Advisor. In these roles, he is responsible for management of our real estate acquisition program. Mr. Donaldson has also served as Chief Investment Officer for Hines Global and the general partner of the advisor for Hines Global since December 2008. He has also served as a Senior Vice President of the general partner of Hines since October 2004 and the Senior Investment Officer and member of the management board of the Core Fund since July 2004. He has been responsible for the acquisition of over $8 billion in assets for various Hines affiliates. He also has been instrumental in the investment and mana gement of the combined capitalization of $840 million of the Hines 1997 U.S. Office Development Fund, L.P. and the Hines 1999 U.S. Office Development Fund, L.P. He was also responsible for the investment and management of Hines Suburban Office Venture, L.L.C. formed in January 2002 with a total capital commitment of $222 million. He graduated from the University of California, San Diego with a B.A. in Quantitative Economics and Decision Sciences and received his M.B.A. from Rice University.

Frank R. Apollo.  Mr. Apollo joined Hines in 1993. He currently serves as Senior Vice President — Finance; Treasurer, and Secretary for us and the general partner of our Advisor and as Senior Vice President — Finance of the Core Fund. He was elected to these positions in April 2008 and is responsible for overseeing portfolio financial management, debt financings, treasury and liquidity management, legal and corporate governance. He served as Chief Accounting Officer, Treasurer and Secretary for us since August 2003 and Chief Accounting Officer of the Core Fund since July 2004. His responsibilities in these positions included accounting, financial reporting, legal and corporate governance. Mr. Apollo has also served as Senior Vice Preside nt — Finance; Treasurer and Secretary for Hines Global and the general partner of the advisor for Hines Global since December 2008. He has also served as a Vice President of the general partner of Hines since 1999 and as the Vice President, Treasurer, and Secretary of our Dealer Manager since August 2003 and, as a result, is responsible for all financial operations of the Dealer Manager. Prior to holding these positions, Mr. Apollo served as the Vice President and Corporate Controller responsible for the accounting and control functions for Hines’ international operations, the Vice President and Regional Controller for Hines’ European Region and the director of Hines’ Internal Audit Department. Before joining Hines, Mr. Apollo was an audit manager with Arthur Andersen. He graduated from the University of Texas with a B.B.A. in Accounting, is a certified public accountant and holds Series 28 and 63 securities licenses.

18

Kevin L. McMeans.  Mr. McMeans joined Hines in 1992. Since April 2008, he has served as the Asset Management Officer for us and the general partner of our Advisor. Mr. McMeans has also served as Asset Management Officer for Hines Global and the general partner of the advisor for Hines Global since December 2008. He has also served as the Asset Management Officer of the Core Fund since January 2005. In these roles, he is responsible for overseeing the management of the various investment properties owned by Hines REIT and the Core Fund. He previously served as the Chief Financial Officer of Hines Corporate Properties, an investment venture established by Hines with a major U.S. pension fund, from 2001 through June 2004. In this role, Mr. McMeans was responsible for negotiating and closing in excess of $830 million of debt financings, underwriting and evaluating new investments, negotiating and closing sale transactions and overseeing the administrative and financial reporting requirements of the venture and its investors. Before joining Hines, Mr. McMeans spent four and a half years at Deloitte & Touche LLP in the Audit Department. He graduated from Texas A&M University with a B.S. in Computer Science and is a certified public accountant.

Ryan T. Sims.  Mr. Sims joined Hines in August 2003. On April 1, 2008, Mr. Sims was elected as the Chief Accounting Officer of Hines REIT, the general partner of our Advisor and the Core Fund. In these roles, he is responsible for management of Hines REIT’s accounting, financial reporting and SEC reporting functions, as well as oversight of the Company’s Sarbanes-Oxley compliance program. He is also responsible for establishing Hines REIT’s accounting policies and ensuring compliance with those policies. Mr. Sims has also served as Chief Accounting Officer for Hines Global and the general partner of the advisor for Hines Global since December 2008. He has also previously served as a Senior Controller for Hines REIT and the general partner of our Advisor since August 2003 and the Core Fund since July 2004. In these roles, in addition to his responsibilities with respect to Hines REIT described above, Mr. Sims has had responsibility for managing the accounting and financial reporting for the Core Fund. Prior to joining Hines, Mr. Sims was a manager in the audit practice of Arthur Andersen, LLP and Deloitte & Touche LLP, serving clients primarily in the real estate industry. He holds a Bachelor of Business Administration degree in Accounting from Baylor University and is a certified public accountant.

* * * *

2.  The first two sentences of the first full paragraph on page 44 of the Prospectus under the bullet points are deleted in their entirety and replaced with the following:

Our directors are accountable to us as fiduciaries. Generally speaking, this means that our directors must perform their duties in good faith and in a manner each director believes to be in our best interests.

Effective April 1, 2009, the compensation committee approved several revisions to the compensation of our independent directors. As a result of these changes, and as a result of certain updates to the information included in this section, the table titled “2008 Director Compensation” and the two paragraphs and bullet points following that table under the caption “Management — Compensation of Directors” on page 47 of the Prospectus is deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following:

2009 Director Compensation

Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash		Stock Awards(1)(2)		Option Awards		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation		Change in Pension Value and Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings		All Other Compensation		Total Compensation
G. Abbott Davis	$	64,750	$	9,150		—		—		—	$	3,757	$	77,657
Thomas A. Hassard	$	68,250	$	9,150		—		—		—	$	2,541	$	79,941
Stanley D. Levy	$	69,750	$	9,150		—		—		—	$	3,205	$	82,105
Paul B. Murphy	$	60,750	$	9,150		—		—		—	$	937	$	70,837
Jeffery C. Hines and C. Hastings Johnson(3)	$	—		—		—		—		—		—		—

____________

(1)	Each of Messrs. Davis, Hassard and Levy received 1,000 restricted shares under our Employee and Director Incentive Share Plan upon his election to our board of directors in each of 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009. Mr. Murphy received 353.5 restricted shares under our incentive plan upon his election to our board of directors for a partial term on April 1, 2008 and 1,000 shares under our incentive plan upon his reelection to our board of directors following our 2008 and 2009 annual meetings.
(2)	Values of the common stock awards were based on the price at which shares of our common stock were sold as of the grant date.
(3)	Messrs. Baughn, Hines and Johnson, who are employees of Hines, receive no additional compensation for serving as Hines REIT directors.

19

    Under the terms of our Employee and Director Incentive Share Plan, each independent director elected or reelected to the board (whether through a shareholder meeting or by directors to fill a vacancy on the board) is granted 1,000 restricted shares on or about the date of election or reelection. These restricted shares will fully vest if the independent director completes the term or partial term for which he or she was elected. Messrs. Davis, Hassard and Levy each received 1,000 restricted shares under our incentive plan upon his election to our board of directors in each of 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008. Mr. Murphy received 353.5 restricted shares under our incentive plan upon his election to our board of directors for a partial term on April 1, 2008 and 1,000 shares under our incentive plan upon his reelection to our board of directors following our 2008 annual meeting. Additionally, Messrs. Davis, Hassard,  Levy and Murphy each received 1,000 restricted shares under our incentive plan upon his election to our board of directors in 2009.

    We pay our independent directors an annual fee of $33,000, and a fee of $2,000 for each meeting of the board (or any committee thereof) attended in person. Pursuant to our Employee and Director Incentive Share Plan, in lieu of receiving his or her annual fee in cash, an independent director is entitled to receive the annual fee in the form of our common shares or a combination of common shares and cash. If a committee meeting is held on the same day as a meeting of the board, each independent director will receive $1,500 for each committee meeting attended in person on such day. We will also pay our independent directors a fee of $500 for each board or committee meeting attended via teleconference lasting one hour or less and $1,000 for board or committee meetings attended via teleconference lasting more than one h our.

    We pay the following annual retainers to the Chairpersons of our board committees:

   • $7,500 to the Chairperson of our conflicts committee;

   • $10,000 to the Chairperson of our audit committee;

   • $3,000 to the Chairperson of our compensation committee; and

   • $3,000 to the Chairperson of our nominating and corporate governance committee.

    All directors are reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at our board or committee meetings.

* * * *

3.  The following disclosure should be added immediately after the first set of bullet points under the heading “Limited Liability and Indemnification of Directors, Officer, Employees and Other Agents” on page 49 of the Prospectus:

However, under the Maryland General Corporation Law, a corporation may not indemnify for an adverse judgment in a suit by or in the right of the corporation or for a judgment of liability on the basis that personal benefit was improperly received, unless in either case a court orders indemnification and then only for expenses.

* * * *

4.  The following disclosure should be added immediately after the first set of bullet points on page 50 of the Prospectus:

The Maryland General Corporation Law permits a corporation to advance reasonable expenses to a director or officer upon the corporation’s receipt of:

• a written affirmation by the director or officer of his or her good faith belief that he or she has met the standard of conduct necessary for indemnification by the corporation and

• a written undertaking by him or her or on his or her behalf to repay the amount paid or reimbursed by the corporation if it is ultimately determined that the standard of conduct was not met.

* * * *

20

5.  The sentence immediately preceding the second set of bullet points on page 50 of the Prospectus is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

However, our charter and bylaws provide that the advancement of funds to our directors and officers for legal expenses and other costs incurred as a result of any legal action for which indemnification is being sought is permissible only if all of the following conditions are satisfied:

* * * *

6. The disclosure under the heading "The Advisor and the Advisory Agreement" on page 51 of the Prospectus is hereby replaced with the following:

The following chart illustrates our general structure and our management relationship with Hines and its affiliates as of December 31, 2009:

* * * *

21

7.  The table on page 52 of the Prospectus is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

Name	Age	Position and Office with the General Partner of the Advisor
Jeffrey C. Hines	54	Chairman of the Managers
C. Hastings Johnson	61	Manager
Charles M. Baughn	55	Manager
Charles N. Hazen	49	President and Chief Executive Officer
Sherri W. Schugart	44	Chief Financial Officer
Edmund A. Donaldson	40	Chief Investment Officer
Frank R. Apollo	43	Senior Vice President — Finance; Treasurer and Secretary
Kevin L. McMeans	45	Asset Management Officer
Ryan T. Sims	38	Chief Accounting Officer

* * * *

8.  The disclosure under the heading “Duties of Our Advisor” on pages 52 through 53 of the Prospectus is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

We do not have any employees. We entered into an Advisory Agreement with our Advisor. Pursuant to this agreement, which was unanimously approved by our board of directors, including our independent directors, we appointed the Advisor to manage, operate, direct and supervise our operations. In connection with managing our operations, the Advisor will face conflicts of interest. Please see “Risk Factors — Potential Conflicts of Interest Risks.” Therefore, the Advisor and its affiliates will perform our day-to-day operational and administrative services. The Advisor is subject to the supervision of our board of directors and provides only the services that are delegated to it. Our independent directors are responsible for reviewing the performance of the Advisor and determining that the compensation to be paid to t he Advisor is reasonable in relation to the nature and quality of services performed and that our investment objectives and the provisions of the Advisory Agreement are being carried out. The Advisor’s duties under the Advisory Agreement include, but are not limited to, the following:

Offering Services

• the development of this offering, including the determination of its specific terms, preparation of all offering and related documents, and obtaining all required regulatory approvals of such documents;

• along with our Dealer Manager, the approval of the participating broker dealers and negotiation of the related selling agreements;

• preparation and approval of all marketing materials to be used by our Dealer Manager or others relating to this offering;

• coordination of the due diligence process relating to participating broker dealers and their review of any prospectuses and our other offering documents;

• creation and implementation of various technology and electronic communications related to this offering;

• along with our Dealer Manager, the negotiation and coordination with our transfer agent of the receipt, collection, processing and acceptance of subscription agreements, commissions, and other administrative support functions; and

• all other services related to this offering, whether performed and incurred by the Advisor or its affiliates.

Acquisition Services

• serve as our investment and financial advisor and provide relevant market research and economic and statistical data in connection with our assets and investment objectives and policies;

• subject to our investment objectives and policies: (i) locate, analyze and select potential investments; (ii) structure and negotiate the terms and conditions of investment transactions; (iii) acquire assets on our behalf; and (iv) arrange for financing related to acquisitions of assets;

• perform due diligence on prospective investments and create summarized due diligence reports;

• prepare reports regarding prospective investments which include recommendations and supporting documentation necessary for our board of directors to evaluate the proposed  investments;

• obtain reports (which may be prepared by our Advisor or its affiliates), where appropriate, concerning the value of our contemplated  investments; and

22

• negotiate and execute approved investments and other transactions.

Asset Management Services

Real Estate Services

• investigate, select, and, on our behalf, engage and conduct business with such persons as the Advisor deems necessary to the proper performance of its obligations under the Advisory Agreement, including but not limited to consultants, accountants, lenders, technical advisors, attorneys, brokers, underwriters, corporate fiduciaries, escrow agents, depositaries, custodians, agents for collection, insurers, insurance agents, developers, construction companies and any and all persons acting in any other capacity deemed by the Advisor necessary or desirable for the performance of any of the foregoing services;

• monitor applicable markets and obtain reports (which may be prepared by our Advisor or its affiliates) where appropriate, concerning the value of our investments;

• monitor and evaluate the performance of our investments; provide daily management services to the Company and perform and supervise the various management and operational functions related to the Company’s investments;

• coordinate with Hines on its duties under the Property Management and Leasing Agreement and assist in obtaining all necessary approvals of major property transactions as governed by such agreement;

• coordinate and manage relationships between the Company and any joint venture partners;

• consult with our officers and board of directors and provide assistance with the evaluation and approval of potential property dispositions, sales or refinancings; and

• provide financial and operational planning services and investment portfolio management functions.

Accounting and Other Administrative Management Services

• manage and perform the various administrative functions necessary for our day-to-day operations;

• from time-to-time, or at any time reasonably requested by the directors, make reports to the directors on our Advisor’s performance of services to us under our Advisory Agreement;

• provide or arrange for administrative services and items, legal and other services, office space, office furnishings, personnel and other overhead items necessary and incidental to the Company’s business and operations;

• provide financial and operational planning services and investment portfolio management functions;

• maintain accounting data and any other information requested concerning the activities of the Company as shall be required to prepare and to file all periodic financial reports and returns required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and any other regulatory agency, including annual financial statements;

• maintain all of our appropriate books and records;

• provide tax and compliance services and risk management services and coordinate with appropriate third parties, including independent accountants and other consultants, on related tax matters;

• supervise the performance of such ministerial and administrative functions as may be necessary in connection with our daily operations;

• provide us with all necessary cash management services;

• manage and coordinate with the transfer agent the dividend process and payments to stockholders;

• consult with the officers and board of directors and assist in evaluating and obtaining adequate insurance coverage based upon risk management determinations;

• provide the officers and directors with timely updates related to the overall regulatory environment affecting us, as well as managing compliance with such matters, including but not limited to compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002;

23

• consult with the officers and board of directors relating to the corporate governance structure and appropriate policies and procedures related thereto; and

• perform all reporting, record keeping, internal controls and similar matters in a manner to allow the Company to comply with applicable laws, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

Shareholder Services

• manage communications with our shareholders, including answering phone calls, preparing and sending written and electronic reports and other communications; and

• establish technology infrastructure to assist in providing shareholder support and service.

Financing Services

•     identify and evaluate potential financing and refinancing sources, engaging a third-party broker if necessary;

•     negotiate terms, arrange and execute financing agreements;

•     manage relationships between us and our lenders; and

•     monitor and oversee the service of our debt facilities and other financings.

Disposition Services

• consult with the board of directors and provide assistance with the evaluation and approval of potential asset dispositions, sales or a sale of assets, our sale or merger, a listing of the shares on a national securities exchange or similar transaction; and

• structure and negotiate the terms and conditions of transactions pursuant to which real estate investments may be sold.

* * * *

9.  The first sentence under the heading “Term of the Advisory Agreement” on page 53 is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

The current term of the Advisory Agreement ends in July 2010, and the Advisory Agreement may be renewed for an unlimited number of successive one-year periods upon the mutual consent of the parties.

* * * *

10.  The second full paragraph on page 58 of the Prospectus is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following updated information:

From inception through December 31, 2009, Hines, its predecessor and their respective affiliates have acquired or developed 895 real estate projects representing more than 283 million square feet.  These projects consisted of a variety of asset types including: office properties (70.9%), industrial properties (12.4%), retail and residential properties (9.7%), hospitality (2.6%) and a variety of other properties. In connection with these projects, Hines has employed many real estate investment strategies, including acquisitions, development, redevelopment and repositioning in the United States and internationally.

As of December 31, 2009, the portfolio of Hines and its affiliates consisted of over 214 projects valued at approximately $22.2 billion. This portfolio is owned by Hines, its affiliates and numerous third-party investors, including pension plans, domestic and foreign institutional investors, high net worth individuals and retail investors. Included in this portfolio of more than 214 projects are approximately 186 properties managed by Hines, representing approximately 69.9 million square feet.  In addition to managing properties in its own portfolio, Hines manages a portfolio of approximately 129 properties with about 52.0 million square feet owned by third parties in which Hines has no ownership interest. The total square feet Hines manages is approximately 121.9 million square feet located throughout the United States and internationally.

* * * *

24

11.  The disclosure beginning with the table titled “Commercial Real Estate Managed by Hines and its Affiliates” beginning on page 58 of the Prospectus through the bar graph immediately preceding the heading “Our Property Management and Leasing Agreements” on page 63 is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

Hines also has extensive experience in disposition services. From 1992 through December 31, 2009, Hines has been involved in the disposition of 161 properties in the United States representing 64.8 million square feet valued at sales prices of $13.9 billion, and 49 properties outside of the United States representing 15.2 million square feet valued at sales prices of approximately $4.5 billion.

The following chart sets forth the Hines organizational structure and the number of people working in each region, the international offices and the central office as of December 31, 2009:

25

The following is information about the executive officers of the general partner of Hines and members of its Executive Committee:

Name	Age	Number of Years with Hines	Position
Gerald D. Hines	84	53	Chairman of the Board
Jeffrey C. Hines	54	28	President and Chief Executive Officer
C. Hastings Johnson	61	32	Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer
Charles M. Baughn	55	25	Executive Vice President and CEO — Capital Markets Group
James C. Buie, Jr.	57	29	Executive Vice President and CEO — West Region and Asia Pacific
Kenneth W. Hubbard	67	36	Executive Vice President and CEO — East Region
Christopher D. Hughes	48	23	Executive Vice President and CEO — East Region
E. Staman Ogilvie	60	36	Executive Vice President and CEO — Eurasia Region
C. Kevin Shannahan	54	27	Executive Vice President and CEO — Midwest, Southeast Region and South America
Mark A. Cover	50	26	Executive Vice President and CEO — Southwest Region and Mexico/Central America
Michael J.G. Topham	62	34	Executive Vice President and CEO — Hines Europe and Middle East/North Africa

Jeffrey C. Hines, C. Hastings Johnson and Charles M. Baughn are on our board of directors. Their biographies are included above with the rest of our management.

Gerald D. Hines.  Mr. Hines is the co-owner and Chairman of the Board of the general partner of Hines, and is responsible for directing all firm policy and procedures as well as participating in major new business ventures and cultivating new and existing investor relations. He is also Chairman of Hines’s Executive Committee. He oversees a portfolio of approximately 214 projects valued at approximately $22.2 billion and has expanded the scope of Hines by moving into foreign markets in 1991, introducing new product lines, initiating acquisition programs and developing major new sources of equity and debt financings.  Over the past ten years, Hines has sponsored funds which acquired or developed $19.7 billion in real estate, $6.9 billion of which related to properties outside of the United States. He graduated from Purdue University with a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering and received an Honorary Doctorate of Engineering from Purdue.  Mr. Hines is the father of Jeffrey C. Hines.

James C. Buie, Jr.  Mr. Buie is an Executive Vice President of the general partner of Hines and CEO of the West region of the United States and Hines Asia. He is responsible for all development and operations in these regions, representing a cumulative total of more than 67 million square feet of real estate. He is also a member of Hines’ Executive Committee. He graduated from the University of Virginia with a B.A. in Economics and received his M.B.A. from Stanford University.

Kenneth W. Hubbard.  Mr. Hubbard joined Hines in 1974. Mr. Hubbard was previously regional profit center officer responsible for all development, operations and transactions in the East region of the United States, representing a cumulative total of more than 36 million square feet of real estate. Effective January 2009, Mr. Hubbard is no longer involved in the day-to-day responsibilities of the East Region but continues to participate in company initiatives and special projects and maintains an office at the East Region headquarters in New York. He graduated from Duke University with a B.A. in History and received his J. D. from Georgetown Law School.

Christopher D. Hughes.  Mr. Hughes is an Executive Vice President of the general partner of Hines and CEO of the East region of the United States and is a member of Hines' Executive Committee. He is responsible for all development and operations in this region. He is also a member of Hines’ Capital Markets Group having raised approximately $11.7 billion in committed equity since 2001. He is responsible for structuring commingled funds and raising equity capital for Hines projects globally. Mr. Hughes was a development officer in the Washington, DC office, where he contributed to the development and acquisition of more than 3.6 million square feet of office space. He graduated from Southern Methodist University with a B.A. in History.

E. Staman Ogilvie.  Mr. Ogilvie is an Executive Vice President of the general partner of Hines and CEO of the Eurasia region. He is responsible for all development and operations of this region, which encompasses Russia and the former Soviet Union, Central and Eastern Europe, Turkey and India. He is a member of Hines’ Executive Committee and former co-head of Hines’ Southwest Region. Mr. Ogilvie has been responsible for the development, acquisition, and management of more than 29 million square feet of commercial real estate as well as several thousand acres of planned community development. He also has extensive experience in strategic planning and finance. He graduated from Washington and Lee University with a B. S. in Business Adminis tration and received his M.B.A. from the Harvard Business School.

26

C. Kevin Shannahan.  Mr. Shannahan is an Executive Vice President of the general partner of Hines and CEO of the Midwest and Southeast regions of the United States. He is responsible for all development and operations in these regions as well as new activities throughout South America and Canada (excluding Vancouver), representing a cumulative total of more than 70 million square feet of real estate and 5,000 acres of land development. He is also a member of Hines’ Executive Committee. He graduated from Cornell University with a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering and received his M.B.A. from the Harvard Business School.

Mark A. Cover.  Mr. Cover is an Executive Vice President of the general partner of Hines and CEO of the Southwest region. He is responsible for all development and operations in the Southwest region of the United States and Mexico representing a total of more than 20 million square feet of real estate. He is also a member of Hines’ Executive Committee. He graduated from Bob Jones University with a B. S in Accounting and is a certified public accountant (retired).

Michael J.G. Topham.  Mr. Topham is an Executive Vice President of the general partner of Hines and CEO of the European region and Hines Middle East/North Africa. He is responsible for all development, acquisitions, operations and real estate services in Europe, the United Kingdom and the Middle East, including the establishment of offices in seven countries and the completed development of over 12 million square feet of real estate in Europe. He is also a member of Hines’ Executive Committee. He was responsible for the establishment and management of Hines’ U.S. Midwest Region in 1985 and the development, acquisition and operations of approximately 15 million square feet of real estate in the United States before relocating to London in 1993 . Between 1977 and 1984, he was also responsible as project officer of major buildings in Houston, Denver, and Minneapolis. He graduated from Exeter University with a B.A. in Economics and received his M.B.A. from the University of California at Berkeley.

Hines’ Real Estate Personnel and Structure

Hines is one of the largest and most experienced privately owned real estate investment, acquisition, development and management companies in the world.  As of December 31, 2009, Hines and its affiliates have approximately 3,450 employees (including approximately 1,200 employees outside of the United States) who work out of Hines’ offices located in 65 cities in the United States and in 16 foreign countries, as shown in the map below.

27

Hines believes that it has mitigated many of the risks inherent in real estate investments by hiring, training and retaining what it believes to be highly-qualified management personnel and by rewarding these employees with performance-based compensation. Hines believes that the stability of its organization and its ability to retain its employees is demonstrated by the longevity of their tenure at Hines, as shown in the table below. Hines maintains what it believes are high performance and professional standards and rewards its personnel for their achievements. Typically, incentive compensation is provided to senior officers, as well as other key employees, in the form of profit sharing programs tied to Hines’ profitability related to each project, investment fund, geographic area, or the firm as a whole. In addition, for asset s or groups of assets within the scope of their responsibilities, Hines’ senior officers typically hold equity investments (by way of participation in the interests held by Hines and its affiliates) in properties acquired or developed by Hines, its affiliates and investment partners. Hines believes this performance-based compensation provides better alignment of interests between Hines’ employees, Hines and its investors, while providing Hines’ employees with long-term incentives. However, there is no guarantee that Hines will be able to retain these employees in the future. The loss of a number of key employees could adversely impact our performance. Please see “Risk Factors — Business and Real Estate Risks — Our success will be dependent on the performance of Hines and its affiliates as well as key employees of Hines.”

	(As of December 31, 2009)
Title	Number of Employees	Average Tenure (Years)
Executive Vice President	9	31
Senior Vice President	45	22
Vice President	134	15
Manager	1,126	7

Hines has employed a decentralized structure and built an international organization with professionals located in major office markets because it believes that knowledge of local market economics and demographic conditions is essential to the success of any real estate asset. Having real estate professionals living and working in most major markets where Hines invests allows Hines to monitor current local conditions and transactions and build relationships with local tenants, brokers and real estate owners. Hines believes that this decentralized structure allows them to better identify potential investment opportunities, perform more effective research of local markets and manage, lease and operate each real estate asset. However, Hines’ decentralized structure may or may not have a positive impact on our performance.

Hines’ Leasing and Property Management

Hines and its affiliates have extensive experience in providing responsive and professional property management and leasing services. Property management and leasing services provided by Hines include the following:

• Tenant relations;

• Energy management;

• Preventive maintenance;

• Security;

• Vendor contracting;

• Parking management;

• Marketing plans;

• Broker relations;

• Tenant prospecting; and

• Lease negotiation.

Hines believes that providing these services in a high quality and professional manner is integral to tenant satisfaction and retention.

28

Hines has been repeatedly recognized as an industry leader in property management and leasing. Hines joined Energy Star® as a partner in 1999, and in 2001, 2002 and 2003, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, named Hines as “Energy Star” Partner of the Year. An Energy Star label is a designation by the EPA for buildings that it believes show excellence in energy performance, reduced operating costs and environmental leadership. In 2004, Hines became the first commercial real estate company to receive the EPA’s Energy Star Sustained Excellence Award. In 2009, the EPA again honored Hines with the Sustained Excellence Award in recognition of the firm’s continued leadership in superior energy management. As of December 31, 2009, Hines owned and/or managed 147 buildings with more than 75 million squ are feet, which have received an “Energy Star” label. Also as of December 31, 2009, Hines owned and/or managed 12 buildings, representing more than 6 million square feet, which have received the EPA’s “Designed to Earn the Energy Star” designation. Hines has been actively involved in the development of the U.S. Green Building Council’s LEED rating system, the nationally accepted benchmark for the design, construction and operation of high-performance buildings. As of December 31, 2009, out of 675 foreign and domestic projects, Hines has 32 projects that have been certified, 16 that have been pre-certified and 144 that are registered under LEED’s various programs. Together, these projects represent more than 102 million square feet. Hines has received more than 80 awards for buildings it has owned and/or managed from the Building Owners and Managers Association including “Building of the Year,” “New Construction of the Year,” “Commercial Recycler of the Year” and “Renovated Building of the Year” in local, regional, national and international competitions. In November 2008, Hines REIT, which is sponsored by Hines, received the NAREIT Gold Leader in the Light Award for demonstrating superior and sustained energy practices. The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, gives the award in collaboration with ENERGY Star.  In 2009, NAREIT again honored Hines REIT with the NAREIT Bronze Leader in the Light Award for its continuing demonstration of superior and sustained energy practices.

Hines was a founding member of the German Sustainable Building Council and is currently engaged in the creation of a Russia Green Building Council. Hines is also active in the BRE Environmental Assessment Method program in the United Kingdom and the Haute Qualité Environnementale program in France.

Additionally, Hines introduced Hines GREEN OFFICE (HinesGO), a voluntary, internal program created to measure and reward sustainability within all Hines offices worldwide. Hines employees lead the effort in setting the standard for a sustainable future by “walking the walk” in Hines’ own offices. Hines recently expanded the HinesGO program by offering it to its more than 3,500 tenants worldwide

Hines believes that real estate is essentially a local business and that it is often a competitive advantage for Hines to have real estate professionals living and working in the local markets in which Hines and its affiliates own properties. This allows Hines’ real estate professionals to obtain local market knowledge and expertise and to maintain significant local relationships. As a result, Hines may have access to off-market acquisitions involving properties that are not yet being generally marketed for sale, which can alleviate competitive bidding and potentially higher costs for properties in certain cases. In addition, in part, as a result of Hines’ strong local presence in the markets it serves and its corporate culture, we believe Hines has a strong track record in attracting and retaining tenants.

Hines believes that tenant retention is a critical component of profitable building operations and results in lower volatility. Tenant loss can reduce operating income by decreasing rental revenue and operating expense recoveries and by exposing the property to market-driven rental concessions that may be required to attract replacement tenants. In addition, a property with high tenant turn-over may incur costs of leasing brokerage commissions and construction costs of tenant improvements required by new occupants of the vacant space.

Hines attempts to manage tenant occupancy proactively by anticipating and meeting tenant needs. In addition, Hines attempts to maintain productive relationships with leasing brokers in most major markets in the U.S. and as of December 31, 2009, maintains ongoing direct relationships with more than 3,500 tenants as the manager of buildings for its own account and as a third-party manager. Hines also has a substantial number of relationships with corporate and financial users of office space as well as with law firms, accounting and consulting firms in multiple locations throughout the United States and, increasingly, in a range of global locations.

29

The following table reflects the average leasing levels of stabilized properties managed by Hines over the past 10 years, as compared to the national average of U.S. office buildings as reported by the National Council of Real Estate Investment Fiduciaries (NCREIF):

* * * *

12.  The disclosure on page 66 of the Prospectus is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

The following table sets forth information with respect to the directors, officers and the key employees of the Dealer Manager:

Name	Age	Position and Office with the Dealer Manager
Charles M. Baughn	55	Director and Chief Executive Officer
Charles N. Hazen	49	Director
Christopher D. Hughes	48	Director
Sherri W. Schugart	44	Director
Robert F. Muller, Jr.	47	Director and President — Retail Distribution
Frank R. Apollo	43	Vice President, Treasurer and Secretary
J. Mark Earley	47	National Sales Director — Retail Distribution
Julie B. Nickell	41	Chief Operating Officer
Lance O. Murphy	39	Divisional Director — Retail Distribution
Dugan Fife	35	Divisional Director — Retail Distribution

Please see “— Our Officers and Directors” for the biographies of Messrs. Baughn, Hazen, Apollo and Ms. Schugart and see “The Hines Organization — General” for the biography of Mr. Hughes.

Robert F. Muller, Jr.   Mr. Muller joined our Dealer Manager in June of 2003 and is the President of REIT Distribution and a director of our Dealer Manager. Prior to joining our Dealer Manager, he was National Director of Sales for Morgan Stanley’s Investment Management Group, which oversaw the distribution of investment management products. Mr. Muller also served as Executive Director for Van Kampen Investments. He is a graduate of the University of Texas at Austin with a B.B.A. in Accounting and holds a Texas Real Estate Brokers License and Series 7, 24 and 63 securities licenses.

30

J. Mark Earley.  Mr. Earley joined our Dealer Manager in September of 2003 and is the Director of REIT Distribution of our Dealer Manager. He is responsible for overseeing share distribution nationally for our Dealer Manager. Prior to joining our Dealer Manager, he was a Managing Director for Morgan Stanley from April 2002 to September 2003. In addition, he was responsible for seeking sales and revenue growth within a region of 65 branches and approximately 1,600 financial advisors. Prior to joining Morgan Stanley, Mr. Earley was the Western Regional Sales Manager for BlackRock Funds from January 2001 to March 2002. He graduated from Stephen F. Austin State University with a B.B.A. in General Business and holds a Texas Real Estate Brokers License and Ser ies 7, 24 and 63 securities licenses.

Julie B. Nickell.  Ms. Nickell joined our Dealer Manager in 2003 and is the Chief Operating Officer of our Dealer Manager. Ms. Nickell previously worked for Hines from 1994 to 1999. From 1999 until she joined our Dealer Manager in the 2003, Ms. Nickell served in the risk consulting practice of a national accounting firm. She graduated from the University of Louisiana at Monroe with a B.B.A. in Accounting. She is a certified public accountant, certified internal auditor, and holds Series 7, 24 and 63 securities licenses.

Lance O. Murphy.  Mr. Murphy joined our Dealer Manager in October of 2008 and is responsible for overseeing share distribution for the Western Division of our Dealer Manager. Before joining our Dealer Manager, he served as an Executive Director for Van Kampen Investments. Prior to that, Mr. Murphy worked as a Regional Vice President for Van Kampen Investments. He started his financial services career in 1994, after graduating from Texas Tech University Rawls College of Business with a B.B.A. in finance. He holds the CIMA® designation and holds Series 7, 24 and 63 securities licenses.

Dugan Fife.  Mr. Fife joined our Dealer Manager in June of 2004 and is responsible for overseeing share distribution for the Eastern Division of our Dealer Manager. Prior to his promotion to Divisional Director, he was a Regional Sales Director for our Dealer Manager covering the states of Michigan, Indiana and Kentucky. Before joining our Dealer Manager, Mr. Fife served as a Regional Vice President for Scudder/Deutsche Bank, with responsibility for wholesaling variable annuities. Prior to that, Mr. Fife worked for Sun Life/MFSLF Securities as a Vice President responsible for wholesaling variable, fixed and indexed annuities. He has been in the securities business since 1997. He is a graduate of the University of Michigan with a B.A. in organizational st udies and holds Series 7, 24 and 63 securities licenses.

I.  Updates to the Management Compensation, Expense Reimbursements and Operating Partnership Participation Interest Section

The following is hereby inserted immediately following the table and related footnotes under “Management Compensation, Expense Reimbursements and Operating Partnership Participation Interest” on page 71:

    The table below provides information regarding fees paid to our Advisor or its affiliates in connection with our operations and public offerings. It includes amounts incurred during the year ended December 31, 2009, as well as amounts payable as of December 31, 2009 (in thousands).

	Incurred		Incurred and Unpaid as of
Type and Recipient	Year Ended December 31, 2009		December 31, 2009
Selling Commissions – the Dealer Manager	$	16,237	$	82
Dealer Manager Fee – the Dealer Manager		5,230		(34	)
Organizational and Offering Costs -  the Advisor		—		268
Acquisition Fee – the Advisor		1,160		—
Asset Management Fee – the Advisor		14,400		7,370
Participation Interest in the Operating Partnership – HALP Associates Limited Partnership		12,424		57,843
Debt Financing Fee – the Advisor		242		—
Property Management Fee – Hines		7,839		5
Leasing Fee – Hines		1,339		488
Tenant Construction Management Fees – Hines		55		32
Re-development Construction Management Fees – Hines		11		(5	)
Expense Reimbursements – Hines (with respect to management and operation of the Company’s properties)		17,016		656

31

J. Updates to Our Real Estate Investments Section

1.  The discussion under the caption “Our Real Estate Investments” beginning on page 71 of the Prospectus through the disclosure immediately preceding the heading “Our Permanent Debt and Revolving Credit Facility” on page 85 of the Prospectus is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:

As of December 31, 2009, we owned direct and indirect investments in 63 properties. These properties consisted of 45 U.S. office properties, one mixed-use office and retail complex in Toronto, Ontario, one industrial property in Dallas, Texas, four industrial properties in Brazil and a portfolio of 12 grocery-anchored shopping centers located in five states primarily in the southeastern United States. These properties contain, in the aggregate, 31.1 million square feet of leasable space, and we believe each property is suitable for its intended purpose. The following tables provide summary information regarding the properties in which we owned interests as of December 31, 2009.

Direct Investments
Property	City	Date Acquired/ Acquisition Cost (in millions)	Leasable Square Feet	Percent Leased		Our Effective Ownership (1)	Major Tenants
321 North Clark	Chicago, IL	4/2006; $247.3	886,752	74%		100%	ABA; Foley & Lardner LLP
Distribution Park Araucaria (9)	Curitiba, Brazil	12/2008; $32.7(2)	459,587	100%	(9)	100%	DHL Exel
Citymark	Dallas, TX	8/2005; $27.8	218,695	95%		100%	Pulte Homes, Inc.; Balfour Beatty Construction; Universal Film Exchanges, LLP
4050/4055 Corporate Drive	Dallas, TX	5/2008; $42.8	643,429	100%		100%	Kay Chemical; FleetPride Corporation; Verizon Communications, Inc.; John H. Harland/Harland Clarke
JPMorgan Chase Tower	Dallas, TX	11/2007; $289.6	1,243,667	87%		100%	Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP; JPMorgan Chase; Deloitte LLP; Fulbright & Jaworski
345 Inverness Drive	Denver, CO	12/2008; $25.7	175,284	100%		100%	Nestle USA
Arapahoe Business Park	Denver, CO	12/2008: $40.8	309,450	74%		100%	Vistar
Raytheon/DIRECTV Buildings	El Segundo, CA	3/2008: $120.0	550,579	100%		100%	Raytheon Company; DIRECTV Group, Inc.
Watergate Tower IV	Emeryville, CA	12/2006: $144.9	344,433	100%		100%	Oracle Corporation; Novartis AG
Williams Tower	Houston, TX	5/2008: $271.5	1,480,623	82%		100%	Williams Companies; Headquarters to Hines and Hines REIT
2555 Grand	Kansas City, MO	2/2008; $155.8	595,607	100%		100%	Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP
One Wilshire	Los Angeles, CA	8/2007: $287.0	661,553	97%		100%	CRG West; Musick, Peeler & Garrett; Verizon Communications, Inc.
3 Huntington Quadrangle	Melville, NY	7/2007: $87.0	407,731	83%		100%	Empire BC/BS; Gentiva Health Services, Inc.; World Alliance Financial
Airport Corporate Center	Miami, FL	1/2006: $156.8	1,021,397	86%		100%	Norwegian Cruise Lines
Minneapolis Office/Flex Portfolio	Minneapolis, MN	9/2007; $87.0	766,430	82%		100%	Preferred One
3400 Data Drive	Rancho Cordova, CA	11/2006: $32.8	149,703	100%		100%	Catholic Healthcare West
Daytona Buildings	Redmond, WA	12/2006: $99.0	251,313	100%		100%	Microsoft Corporation
Laguna Buildings	Redmond, WA	1/2007: $118.0	460,661	78%		100%	Honeywell Industries

32

Property City Date Acquired/ Acquisition Cost (in millions) Leasable Square Feet Percent Leased Our Effective Ownership (1) Major Tenants

1515 S Street	Sacramento, CA	11/2005: $66.6	349,185	100%		100%	Two State of California agencies
1900 and 2000 Alameda	San Mateo, CA	6/2005: $59.8	253,187	95%		100%	California Casualty; County of San Mateo
Distribution Park   Elouveira (10)	Sao Paulo, Brazil	12/2008: $40.4(2)	534,794	100%	(10)	100%	DHL Exel
Distribution Park   Vinhedo (10)	Sao Paulo, Brazil	12/2008:$41.8(2)	609,474	100%	(10)	100%	DHL Exel
Seattle Design Center	Seattle, WA	6/2007: $56.8	390,684	81%		100%	(11)
5th and Bell	Seattle, WA	6/2007; $72.2	197,135	98%		100%	Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V.; University of Washington; Edelman
Atrium on Bay	Toronto, CAN	2/2007: $215.5(3)	1,077,467	98%		100%	Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
Total for Directly-Owned Properties			14,038,820	91%
Indirect Investments
Core Fund Properties
One Atlantic Center	Atlanta, GA	7/2006; $305.0	1,100,312	76%		23.20%	Alston & Bird LLP; Bryan Cave LLP
The Carillon Building	Charlotte, NC	7/2007; $140.0	471,507	77%		23.20%	Cadwalder Wickersham & Taft; Deloitte LLP
Charlotte Plaza	Charlotte, NC	6/2007; $175.5	625,026	93%		23.20%	Wells Fargo Advisors
One North Wacker	Chicago, IL	3/2008; $540.0	1,373,754	97%		23.20%	UBS; PriceWaterhouseCoopers;
Three First National Plaza	Chicago, IL	3/2005; $245.3	1,423,353	89%		18.56%	K & L Gates
333 West Wacker	Chicago, IL	4/2006; $223.0	853,243	77%		18.51%	Nuveen Investments, Inc.
One Shell Plaza	Houston, TX	5/2004; $228.7	1,230,395	100%		11.60%	Shell Oil Company; Baker Botts LLP
Two Shell Plaza	Houston, TX	5/2004; $123.1	565,553	95%		11.60%	Shell Oil Company
425 Lexington Avenue	New York, NY	8/2003; $358.6	700,034	100%		11.67%	Simpson Thatcher & Bartlett LLP; Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
499 Park Avenue	New York, NY	8/2003; $153.1	291,480	81%		11.67%	Olkos Ventures, LLC; Bloomberg LP; Cantor Fitzgerald LP
600 Lexington Avenue	New York, NY	2/2004; $91.6	289,386	94%		11.67%	Alvarez & Marsal
Renaissance Square	Phoenix, AZ	12/2007; $270.9	965,508	88%		23.20%	Quarles & Brady Streich Lang, LLP; Lewis & Roca LLP; U.S. General Services Administration
Riverfront Plaza	Richmond, VA	11/2006; $277.5	951,590	95%		23.20%	Wells Fargo Advisors; Hunton & Williams; Branch Banking & Trust

Johnson Ranch Corporate Centre	Roseville, CA	5/2007; (4)	179,990	45%	18.51%	Centex Homes
Roseville Corporate Center	Roseville, CA	5/2007; (4)	111,418	76%	18.51%	Prudential Insurance Company; Verizon California Inc.; Umpqua Bank
Summit at Douglas Ridge	Roseville, CA	5/2007; (4)	185,128	62%	18.51%	(11)

33

Property City Date Acquired/ Acquisition Cost (in millions) Leasable Square Feet Percent Leased Our Effective Ownership (1) Major Tenants

Olympus Corporate Centre	Roseville, CA	5/2007; (4)	193,178	54%		18.51%	(11)
Douglas Corporate Center	Roseville, CA	5/2007; (4)	214,606	76%		18.51%	New York Life Insurance Co.
Wells Fargo Center	Sacramento, CA	5/2007; (4)	502,365	96%		18.51%	(11)
525 B Street	San Diego, CA	8/2005; $116.3	449,183	94%		23.20%	Golden Eagle Insurance; Procopio; US Navy HR
The KPMG Building	San Francisco, CA	9/2004; $148.0	379,328	100%		23.20%	KPMG LLP; Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP; UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.; Preston Gates Ellis LLP
101 Second Street	San Francisco, CA	9/2004; $157.0	388,370	83%		23.20%	Reed Smith; Ziff Davis
720 Olive Way	Seattle, WA	1/2006; $83.7	300,710	80%		18.51%	Community Health Plan of Washington
1200 19th Street	Washington, D.C.	8/2003; $69.4	337,239	60%		11.67%	(11)
Warner Center	Woodland Hills, CA	10/2006; $311.0	808,274	90%		18.51%	Health Net of California; NetZero, Inc.
Total for Core Fund Properties			14,890,930	88%
Grocery-Anchored Portfolio
Cherokee Plaza	Atlanta, GA	11/2008; (5)	99,749	100%		70%	Kroger
Bellaire Boulevard Center	Bellaire, TX	11/2008; (5)	35,081	97%		70%	Randall’s (Safeway)
Thompson Bridge Commons	Gainesville, GA	3/2009; $15.3	92,587	95%		70%	Kroger
Champions Village	Houston, TX	11/2008; (5)	384,581	91%		70%	Randall’s (Safeway); Stein Mart
King’s Crossing	Kingwood, TX	11/2008; (5)	126,397	97%		70%	Randall’s
Sandy Plains Exchange	Marietta, GA	2/2009; $12.4	72,784	95%		70%	Publix
Commons at Dexter Lakes	Memphis, TN	11/2008; (5)	228,496	94%		70%	Kroger; Stein Mart; Marshalls; Samuels Furniture
Mendenhall Commons	Memphis, TN	11/2008; (5)	79,871	99%		70%	H-E-B
University Palms Shopping Center	Oviedo, FL	11/2008; (5)	99,172	88%		70%	Publix
Shoppes at Parkland	Parkland, FL	3/2009; $27.7	145,652	93%		70%	BJ's
Oak Park Village	San Antonio, TX	11/2008; (5)	64,287	100%		70%	H-E-B
Heritage Station	Wake Forest, NC	1/2009; $10.8	68,641	87%		70%	Harris Teeter
Total for Grocery-Anchored Portfolio			1,497,298	94%
Other
Distribution Park Rio(6)	Rio de Janeiro, Brazil	7/2007: $53.7(7)	693,115	99%		50%	DHL Exel; Schio; Cometa; Metropolitan Transports
Total for All Properties			31,120,163	90%	(8)

__________

34

(1)	This percentage shows the effective ownership of the Operating Partnership in the properties listed. On December 31, 2009, Hines REIT owned a 96.7% interest in the Operating Partnership as its sole general partner. Affiliates of Hines owned the remaining 3.3% interest in the Operating Partnership. In addition, we owned an approximate 28.7% non-managing general partner interest in the Core Fund as of December 31, 2009. The Core Fund does not own 100% of its properties; its ownership interest in its properties ranges from 40.3% to 80.7%.
(2)	These three properties were purchased in a single transaction for an aggregate purchase price of 269.9 million BRL. These amounts were translated using the currency exchange rate in effect as of the date of acquisition.  On January 22, 2010 we sold Distribution Park Aruacaria in Curitiba, Brazil. The sales price was $38.4 million (69.9 million BRL translated at a rate of 1.818 BRL per $1 USD).
(3)	This amount was converted from 250.0 million CAD using the currency exchange rate in effect as of the date of acquisition.
(4)	These properties were purchased as part of a portfolio that included six properties for a purchase price of $490.2 million.
(5)	These properties were purchased as part of a portfolio that included eight properties for a purchase price of $205.1 million.
(6)	We own a 50% indirect interest in Distribution Park Rio, an industrial property located in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, through a joint venture with Hines Calpers Brazil (“HCB”), an affiliate of Hines. We formed the joint venture in June 2007 with an initial investment of $28.9 million.
(7)	This amount was converted from 103.7 million BRL using the currency exchange rate in effect as of the date of acquisition.
(8)	This amount represents the percentage leased assuming we own a 100% interest in each of these properties.  The percentage leased based on our effective ownership interest in each property is 90%.

(9)	This property was sold on January 22, 2010. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Results of Operations —Discontinued Operations” for additional information.
(10)	These properties were sold on April 22, 2010. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Results of Operations —Discontinued Operations” for additional information.
(11)	No tenant occupies more than 10% of the space.

Lease Expirations

Directly-Owned Properties

The following table lists, on an aggregate basis, all of the scheduled lease expirations for each of the years ending December 31, 2010 through December 31, 2019 and thereafter for the 25 properties we owned directly as of December 31, 2009. The table shows the approximate leasable square feet represented by the applicable lease expirations:

			Leasable Area
Year	Number of Leases		Approximate Square Feet		Percent of Total Leasable Area
Vacant		—		1,330,673		9.5	%
2010		117		839,463		6.0	%
2011		102		904,849		6.5	%
2012		71		1,494,277		10.7	%
2013		66		3,591,116		25.7	%
2014		56		1,248,512		8.9	%
2015		31		636,758		4.5	%
2016		19		770,890		5.5	%
2017		18		660,727		4.7	%
2018		18		1,161,946		8.3	%
2019		12		489,394		3.5	%
Thereafter		9		864,127		6.2	%

35

Indirectly-Owned Properties

The following table lists all of the scheduled lease expirations for each of the years ending December 31, 2010 through December 31, 2019 and thereafter for the 38 properties in which we owned an indirect interest as of December 31, 2009. The table shows the approximate leasable square feet represented by the applicable lease expirations and assumes we own a 100% interest in each of the properties:

			Leasable Area
Year	Number of Leases		Approximate Square Feet		Percent of Total Leasable Area
Vacant		—		1,903,037		11.2	%
2010		168		1,168,891		6.9	%
2011		155		1,503,283		8.8	%
2012		142		1,350,409		7.9	%
2013		115		2,193,310		12.9	%
2014		112		1,300,484		7.6	%
2015		49		2,341,248		13.8	%
2016		31		481,188		2.8	%
2017		31		584,750		3.4	%
2018		21		1,115,683		6.6	%
2019		28		940,589		5.5	%
Thereafter		38		2,137,219		12.6	%

All Properties

The following table lists our pro-rata share of the scheduled lease expirations for each of the years ending December 31, 2010 through December 31, 2019 and thereafter for all of the properties in which we owned an interest as of December 31, 2009. The table shows the approximate leasable square feet represented by the applicable lease expirations:

			Leasable Area
Year	Number of Leases		Approximate Square Feet(1)		Percent of Total Leasable Area(1)
Vacant		—		1,751,214		9.6	%
2010		285		1,196,138		6.6	%
2011		257		1,267,377		7.0	%
2012		213		1,876,122		10.3	%
2013		181		4,214,506		23.1	%
2014		168		1,652,918		9.1	%
2015		80		1,065,312		5.8	%
2016		50		871,663		4.8	%
2017		49		779,774		4.3	%
2018		39		1,418,727		7.8	%
2019		40		698,369		3.8	%
Thereafter		47		1,420,379		7.8	%

__________

(1) These amounts represent our pro-rata share based on our effective ownership in each of the properties as of December 31, 2009.

36

Market Concentration

The following table provides a summary of the market concentration of our portfolio based on our pro-rata share (unless otherwise noted) of the market value of each of the properties in which we owned interests as of December 31, 2009. The estimated value of each property is based on the most recent appraisals available or the purchase price, in the case of recent acquisitions:

Market	Market Concentration: Directly-Owned Properties			Market Concentration: Indirectly-Owned Properties(1)			Market Concentration: All Properties
Los Angeles, California		16	%		5	%		12	%
Chicago, Illinois		9	%		24	%		12	%
Houston, Texas		10	%		8	%		10	%
Seattle, Washington		11	%		2	%		9	%
Dallas, Texas		12	%		—			9	%
San Francisco, California		7	%		8	%		7	%
Toronto, Ontario		8	%		—			5	%
Sacramento, California		3	%		7	%		5	%
Miami, Florida		6	%		1	%		4	%
New York, New York		3	%		11	%		4	%
Kansas City, Missouri		6	%		—			4	%
Atlanta, Georgia		—			8	%		3	%
Minneapolis, Minnesota		3	%		—			2	%
Sao Paulo, Brazil		3	%		—			2	%
Charlotte, North Carolina		—			6	%		2	%
Denver, Colorado		2	%		—			2	%
Richmond, Virginia		—			7	%		2	%
Phoenix, Arizona		—			6	%		2	%
Curitiba, Brazil		1	%		—			1	%
Memphis, Tennessee		—			1	%		1	%
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil		—			1	%		1	%
San Diego, California		—			2	%		1	%
Orlando, Florida		—			*			*
Washington, D.C.		—			3	%		*
Raleigh, North Carolina		—			*			*
San Antonio, Texas		—			*			*

__________

*	Represents less than 1%.
(1)	These amounts represent the properties in which we owned an indirect interest through our investments in the Core Fund, the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio and our joint venture in Brazil as of December 31, 2009. These amounts assume we own a 100% interest in each of the properties.

37

Industry Concentration

The following table provides a summary of the industry concentration of the tenants of the properties in which we owned interests based on our pro-rata share (unless otherwise noted) of their leased square footage as of December 31, 2009.

Industry	Industry Concentration: Directly-Owned Properties			Industry Concentration: Indirectly-Owned Properties(1)			Industry Concentration: All Properties
Manufacturing		24	%		2	%		19	%
Legal		13	%		29	%		15	%
Finance and Insurance		13	%		27	%		15	%
Information and Technology		12	%		3	%		10	%
Grocery-Anchored Retail		—			10	%		6	%
Government		6	%		3	%		5	%
Professional Services		4	%		5	%		4	%
Oil & Gas/Energy		3	%		5	%		4	%
Health Care		4	%		1	%		3	%
Real Estate	��	3	%		2	%		3	%
Accounting		2	%		5	%		2	%
Transportation and Warehousing		1	%		3	%		2	%
Other Services		3	%		1	%		2	%
Wholesale Trade		3	%		*			2	%
Arts, Entertainment and Recreation		2	%		*			2	%
Construction		2	%		*			2	%
Other		2	%		2			2	%
Retail		2	%		1	%		1	%
Administrative and Support Services		1	%		1	%		1	%

__________

*	Represents less than 1%.
(1)	These amounts represent the properties in which we owned an indirect interest through our investments in the Core Fund, the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio and our joint venture in Brazil as of December 31, 2009. These amounts assume we own a 100% interest in each of the properties.

Our Significant Investments

Specified below is certain information about our real estate investments owned as of December 31, 2009, which are significant in terms of assets or revenue in relation to the total assets or revenue included in our consolidated financial statements. These properties will be subject to competition from similar properties within their market areas and their economic performance could be affected by changes in local economic conditions. In evaluating these properties for acquisition, we considered a variety of factors including location, functionality and design, price per square foot, replacement cost, the credit worthiness of tenants, length of lease terms, market fundamentals and the in-place rental rates compared to market rates.

One Wilshire

One Wilshire, an office property in Los Angeles, California, consists of a thirty-story office building constructed in 1966 and renovated in 1992. The property contains 661,553 square feet of rentable area and is 97% leased. CRG West LLC, a data center and property management company, leases 172,970 square feet or approximately 26% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in July 2017. Musick, Peeler & Garrett LLP, a national law firm, leases 106,475 square feet or approximately 16% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in October 2018 and contains options to renew for two additional five-year periods. Verizon Communications, Inc., a broadband and telecommunications company, leases 79,716 square feet or approximately 12% of the building’s rentable area, under seven leases that expire in various years through 2013. One of the leases expires in July 2012 and contains an option to renew for one additional five-year period and another lease expires in August 2013 and contains options to renew for two additional five-year periods. The remaining rentable area is leased to 48 tenants, none of which leases more than 10% of the building’s rentable area.

38

The following table shows the weighted average occupancy rate, expressed as a percentage of rentable square feet, and the average effective annual gross rent per leased square foot, for One Wilshire during the past five years ended December 31:

Year	Weighted Average Occupancy	Average Effective Annual Gross Rent per Leased Sq. Ft.(1)
2005	97.7%	$   21.94
2006	97.3%	$   21.79
2007	99.3%	$   27.90
2008	99.0%	$   41.14
2009	97.8%	$   45.27

____________

(1) Average effective annual gross rent per leased square foot for each year is calculated by dividing such year’s accrual-basis total rent revenue (including operating expense recoveries) by the weighted average square footage under lease during such year.

In connection with our acquisition of One Wilshire, we paid our Advisor approximately $1.4 million in cash acquisition fees. In addition, the interest in the Operating Partnership represented by the Participation Interest increased as a result of this acquisition.

We currently have no plans for material renovations or other capital improvements at the property and believe the property is suitable for its intended purpose and adequately covered by insurance. The cost of One Wilshire (excluding the cost attributable to land) is being depreciated for tax purposes over a 40-year period on a straight-line basis.

The following table lists, on an aggregate basis, all of the scheduled lease expirations each of the years ending December 31, 2010 through 2019 and thereafter for One Wilshire. The table shows the approximate leasable square feet represented by the applicable lease expirations:

		Gross Leasable Area
Year	Number of Leases	Approximate Square Feet	Percent of Total Leasable Area
2010	10	36,124	5.5%
2011	10	82,669	12.5%
2012	7	86,174	13.0%
2013	9	88,802	13.4%
2014	4	23,454	3.5%
2015	2	14,025	2.1%
2016	1	4,313	0.7%
2017	6	198,804	30.1%
2018	1	106,475	16.1%
2019	1	4,597	0.7%
Thereafter	—	—	—

39

Chase Tower

JPMorgan Chase Tower (“Chase Tower”), a 55-story office building located in the uptown submarket of Dallas, Texas, was constructed in 1987. It contains approximately 1.2 million square feet of rentable area that is approximately 87% leased. JPMorgan Chase, a financial services firm, leases 195,805 square feet or approximately 16% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in September 2022. Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP, a law firm, leases 183,052 square feet or approximately 15% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in December 2015. Deloitte LLP, a public accounting firm, leases 154,476 square feet or approximately 12% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in June 2012. Fulbright & Jaworski, a law firm, leases 139,565 square feet or approximately 11% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in December 2016. The remaining rentable area is leased to 35 tenants, none of which leases more than 10% of the building’s rentable area.

The following table shows the weighted average occupancy rate, expressed as a percentage of rentable square feet, and the average effective annual gross rent per leased square foot, for Chase Tower during the past five years ended December 31:

Year	Weighted Average Occupancy	Average Effective Annual Gross Rent per Leased Sq. Ft.(1)
2005	77.7%	$   25.35
2006	80.1%	$   24.52
2007	85.0%	$   22.68
2008	87.7%	$   28.90
2009	87.9%	$   28.65

____________

(1) Average effective annual gross rent per leased square foot for each year is calculated by dividing such year’s accrual-basis total rent revenue (including operating expense recoveries) by the weighted average square footage under lease during such year.

In connection with our acquisition of Chase Tower, we paid our Advisor approximately $1.4 million in cash acquisition fees. In addition, the interest in the Operating Partnership represented by the Participation Interest increased as a result of this acquisition.

We currently have no plans for material renovations or other capital improvements at the property and believe the property is suitable for its intended purpose and adequately covered by insurance. The cost of Chase Tower (excluding the cost attributable to land) is being depreciated for tax purposes over a 40-year period on a straight-line basis.

The following table lists, on an aggregate basis, all of the scheduled lease expirations for each of the years ending December 31, 2010 through 2019 and thereafter for Chase Tower. The table shows the approximate leasable square feet represented by the applicable lease expirations:

		Gross Leasable Area
Year	Number ofLeases	Approximate Square Feet	Percent of Total Leasable Area
2010	4	16,253	1.3%
2011	9	66,830	5.4%
2012	8	199,456	16.0%
2013	6	64,036	5.1%
2014	—	—	—
2015	4	218,556	17.6%
2016	3	191,246	15.4%
2017	1	26,122	2.1%
2018	3	87,468	7.0%
2019	—	—	—
Thereafter	1	195,805	15.7%

40

Williams Tower

Williams Tower is comprised of: a 64-story office building with an adjacent parking garage located in the Galleria/West Loop submarket of Houston, Texas and a 2.3-acre land parcel located across the street from Williams Tower on Post Oak Boulevard. The seller, Transco Tower Limited, is not affiliated with us or our affiliates.

Williams Tower was constructed in 1982 and consists of approximately 1.5 million square feet of rentable area that is approximately 82% leased. Williams companies and its subsidiaries, a natural gas pipe line operator, leases 287,523 square feet or approximately 19% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in March 2014 and contains options to renew for three additional five-year periods. The remaining rentable area is leased to 51 tenants, none of which leases more than 10% of the building’s rentable area.

Williams Tower is managed by Hines. In addition, we are headquartered in Williams Tower and Hines and its affiliates lease space in Williams Tower. In the aggregate, Hines and its affiliates lease 9% of the building’s rentable area.

The contract purchase price for Williams Tower was approximately $271.5 million, exclusive of transaction costs, financing fees and working capital reserves. The acquisition was funded using proceeds from our public offerings and borrowings under our revolving credit facility with KeyBank National Association.

In connection with the acquisition of this property, we paid our Advisor approximately $1.4 million in cash acquisition fees. In addition, the interest in the Operating Partnership represented by the Participation Interest increased as a result of this acquisition. Hines will continue to serve as the property manager and will provide services and receive certain fees and expense reimbursements in connection with the leasing, operation and management of Williams Tower.

We currently have no plans for material renovations or other capital improvements at the property and believe the property is suitable for its intended purpose and adequately covered by insurance. The cost of Williams Tower (excluding the cost attributable to land) will be depreciated for tax purposes over a 40-year period on a straight-line basis.

The following table shows the weighted average occupancy rate, expressed as a percentage of rentable square feet, and the average effective annual gross rent per leased square foot, for Williams Tower during the past five years ended December 31:

Year	Weighted Average Occupancy	Average Effective Annual Gross Rent per Leased Sq. Ft.(1)
2005	59.8%	$   20.65
2006	68.7%	$   20.91
2007	88.6%	$   18.55
2008	94.7%	$   24.18
2009	84.7%	$   25.71

___________

(1) Average effective annual gross rent per leased square foot for each year is calculated by dividing such year’s accrual-basis total rent revenue (including operating expense recoveries) by the weighted average square footage under lease during such year.

The following table lists, on an aggregate basis, all of the scheduled lease expirations for each of the years ending December 31, 2010 through 2019 and thereafter for Williams Tower. The table shows the approximate leasable square feet represented by the applicable lease expirations:

		Gross Leasable Area
Year	Number of Leases	Approximate Square Feet	Percent of Total Leasable Area
2010	9	136,879	9.2%
2011	5	41,577	2.8%
2012	4	30,601	2.1%
2013	6	152,131	10.3%
2014	12	398,748	26.9%
2015	3	36,966	2.5%
2016	7	251,423	17.0%
2017	3	95,966	6.5%
2018	1	45,402	3.1%
2019	2	29,334	2.0%
Thereafter	—	—	—

41

Atrium on Bay

Atrium on Bay, a mixed-use office and retail complex located in the Downtown North submarket of the central business district of Toronto, Canada, was constructed in 1984. Atrium on Bay is comprised of three office towers, a two-story retail mall, and a two-story parking garage. The buildings consist of 1,077,467 square feet of rentable area and are 98% leased to a variety of office and retail tenants. The Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, a financial institution, leases 364,043 square feet, or approximately 34% of the rentable area, through leases that expire in 2011, 2013 and 2016. The balance of the complex is leased to 89 tenants, none of which leases more than 10% of the rentable area of the complex.

The following table shows the weighted average occupancy rate, expressed as a percentage of rentable square feet, and the average effective annual gross rent per leased square foot, for the property during the past five years ended December 31:

Year	Weighted Average Occupancy	Average Effective Annual Gross Rent per Leased Sq. Ft.(1)
2005	85.4%	$   32.46
2006	83.6%	$   34.22
2007	86.6%	$   32.78
2008	90.4%	$   33.45
2009	98.3%	$   35.05

____________

(1) Average effective annual gross rent per leased square foot for each year is calculated by dividing such year’s accrual-basis total rent revenue (including operating expense recoveries) by the weighted average square footage under lease during such year.

We currently have no plans for material renovations or other capital improvements at the property and believes the property is suitable for its intended purpose and adequately covered by insurance. The cost of Atrium on Bay (excluding the cost attributable to land) is being depreciated for tax purposes over a 40-year period on a straight-line basis.

The following table lists, on an aggregate basis, all of the scheduled lease expirations each of the years ending December 31, 2010 through 2019 and thereafter for Atrium on Bay. The table shows the approximate leasable square feet represented by the applicable lease expirations:

		Gross Leasable Area
Year	Number of Leases	Approximate Square Feet	Percent of Total Leasable Area
2010	10	18,934	1.8%
2011	15	64,159	6.0%
2012	11	114,846	10.7%
2013	11	196,126	18.2%
2014	14	176,515	16.4%
2015	7	54,091	5.0%
2016	4	218,730	20.3%
2017	2	7,737	0.7%
2018	7	179,127	16.6%
2019	6	4,507	0.4%
Thereafter	3	13,078	1.2%

* * * *

42

2.  The first two paragraphs under the heading “Met Life Credit Facility” on page 86 of the Prospectus are deleted in their entirety and replaced with the following:

A subsidiary of the Operating Partnership entered into a credit agreement with Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, which provides a secured credit facility to the borrower and certain of its subsidiaries in the maximum principal amount of $750.0 million, subject to certain borrowing limitations (the “Met Life Credit Facility”). As of December 31, 2009, the Company has $205.0 million outstanding  related to two loans under the Met Life Credit Facility (as further described below) and there is no remaining capacity under this credit facility. These loans contain a prepayment lockout period of two years and thereafter, prepayment will be permitted subject to certain fees.

The Met Life Credit Facility also contains other customary events of default, some with corresponding cure periods, including, without limitation, payment defaults, cross-defaults to other agreements evidencing indebtedness and bankruptcy-related defaults, and customary covenants, including limitations on the incurrence of debt and granting of liens and the maintenance of minimum loan-to- value and debt service coverage ratios. The Company is not aware of any instances of noncompliance relating to covenants of the Met Life Credit Facility as of December 31, 2009.

* * * *

3.  The last two paragraphs under the heading “HSH Credit Facility” on page 87 of the Prospectus are deleted in their entirety and replaced with the following:

The HSH Credit Facility provides that an event of default will exist if a change in majority ownership or control occurs for the Advisor or Hines, or if the Advisor no longer provides advisory services or manages the day-to-day operations of Hines REIT. The HSH Credit Facility also contains other customary events of default, some with corresponding cure periods, including, without limitation, payment defaults, cross-defaults to other agreements evidencing indebtedness and bankruptcy-related defaults, and customary covenants, including limitations on the incurrence of debt and granting of liens and the maintenance of certain financial ratios. The Company is not aware of any instances of noncompliance relating to covenants of the HSH Credit Facility as of December 31, 2009.

Additionally, HSH Nordbank has the right to have the properties serving as collateral under this facility appraised every two years. Should the aggregate outstanding principal amounts under this facility exceed 55% of the lender’s appraised values, the Company must rebalance through making partial payment or providing additional collateral to eliminate such excess. During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Company made payments totaling $106.1 million to HSH Nordbank in order to rebalance the collateral for the properties under this facility. Considering the declining real estate values in recent months, the Company could be required to pay additional amounts to rebalance the collateral for the properties under this credit facility.

* * * *

4.  The discussion under the heading “Our Revolving Credit Facility” beginning on page 87 of the Prospectus is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

We have a revolving credit facility with KeyBank, as administrative agent for itself and various other lenders, with maximum aggregate borrowing capacity of up to $250.0 million. We established this facility to repay certain bridge financing incurred in connection with certain of our acquisitions and to provide a source of funds for future real estate investments and to fund our general working capital needs.

The credit facility has a maturity date of October 31, 2010, which is subject to extension at our election for one additional year, subject to specified conditions. The facility allows, at our election, for our borrowing at a variable rate of a LIBOR-based rate plus a spread ranging from 125 to 200 basis points on prescribed leverage ratios. On September 23, 2009, we exercised our option to extend the maturity date of the credit facility to October 31, 2010. Other than the maturity date, no other terms or conditions of the credit facility were changed as a result of the extension. The weighted average interest rate on outstanding borrowings was 2.0% as of December 31, 2009.

In addition to customary covenants and events of default, the credit facility provides that it shall be an event of default under the agreement if our Advisor ceases to be controlled by Hines or if Hines ceases to be majority-owned and controlled, directly or indirectly, by Jeffrey C. Hines or certain members of his family. The loan is secured by a pledge of the Operating Partnership’s equity interests in entities that directly or indirectly hold real property assets, including our interest in the Core Fund, subject to certain limitations and exceptions. We have entered into a subordination agreement with Hines and our Advisor, which provides that the rights of Hines and the Advisor to be reimbursed by us for certain expenses are subordinate to our obligations under the credit agreement.  

43

In accordance with the provisions of the credit facility agreement, we expect to re-appraise our properties during the 2nd quarter of 2010. Given the current economic environment, we expect the values of some or all of the properties will be lower than previous values. Accordingly, we may not comply with certain covenants of this credit facility which could limit the availability of funds under our credit facility and limit our ability to extend this facility or negotiate a new revolving credit facility. To the extent we remain in compliance with such covenants, we intend to exercise our option extend this facility prior to its maturity in October 2010. If we do meet the financial covenants, we would expect to negotiate a new revolving credit facility.

* * * *

5.  The disclosure under the heading “Liquidity and Redemption Rights” on page 91 of the Prospectus is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

Beginning one year after acquisition of an interest in the Core Fund, a partner may request redemption of all or a portion of such interest at a price equal to the interest’s value based on the net asset value of the Core Fund’s assets. In such event, the Core Fund generally will attempt to redeem up to 10% of its outstanding interests during any calendar year; provided that the managing general partner may limit redemptions as the result of certain tax and regulatory considerations. To exercise a redemption right, a partner must request that the Core Fund redeem a specific number of units at any time within the last 45 days of any calendar year after the holding period described above. Subject to specified limitations, the managing general partner generally shall redeem the units specified on or before the last day of the following calendar year.  The Core Fund is not required to fulfill redemption requests during 2010 and 2011 if the Core Fund is not able to raise or acquire sufficient funds to do so on terms acceptable to the Core Fund, as determined in good faith by the managing general partner based on analysis of certain factors set forth in the Core Fund partnership agreement.  The Core Fund may use unused capital commitments, proceeds from asset sales, indebtedness or other sources to fund any such redemption. Please see “Risk Factors — Business and Real Estate Risks — We are subject to risks as the result of joint ownership of real estate with other Hines programs and third parties,” and “Risk Factors — Business and Real Estate Risks — If the Core Fund is forced to sell its assets in order to satisfy mandatory redemption requirements, our investment in the Core Fund may be materially adversely affected.”

K.  Updates to the Investment Objectives and Policies with Respect to Certain Activities Section

1.  The second paragraph under the heading “Acquisition and Investment Policies” on page 101 of the Prospectus is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

We believe there are also significant opportunities for real estate investments that currently exist in other markets outside of the United States. Some of this real estate is located in developed markets such as the United Kingdom, Germany and France, while other real estate investment opportunities are located in emerging or maturing markets such as Brazil, Mexico, Russia and China. We believe that investing in international properties that meet our investment policies and objectives could provide additional diversification and enhanced investment returns to our real estate portfolio.

* * *

2.  The last paragraph before the heading “Joint Venture Investments” on page 104 is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

However, international investments involve unique risks. In addition to risks associated with real estate investments generally, regardless of location, country-specific risks and currency risks add an additional layer of factors that must be considered when investing in non-U.S. real estate. We believe that having access to Hines’ international organization, with regional offices in 16 foreign countries and real estate professionals living and working full time in these international markets, will be a valuable resource to us when considering international opportunities. As of December 31, 2009, Hines had offices in the United Kingdom, France, Spain, Mexico, Poland, Germany, Brazil, Italy, China, Canada, Russia, Panama, Luxembourg, United Arab Emirates, India and Turkey. Hines has acquired, developed, or redeveloped o ver 114 projects outside of the United States in the 10 year period ended December 31, 2009 with an aggregate cost of approximately $10.2 billion. A majority of these projects are located in maturing or emerging markets. Our Advisor has access to Hines’ international organization, and we expect to consider interests in non-U.S. markets as the size of our portfolio increases, including opportunities in maturing or emerging markets. However, we cannot assure investors that we will be able to successfully manage the various risks associated with, and unique to, investing in foreign markets.

* * * *

3.  The second paragraph under the heading “Financing Strategy and Policies” on page 106 of the Prospectus is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

We had debt financing in an amount equal to approximately 58% of the estimated aggregate value of our real estate investments as of December 31, 2009 (including our pro rata share of real estate assets and related debt owned through our investments in other entities such as the Core Fund), consisting primarily of outstanding loans under our revolving credit facility and secured mortgage financings. As of December 31, 2009, this percentage was based upon our most recent appraised values, which for many of our assets, were completed more than one year ago. Given the current economic environment, we expect the values of some or all of our properties will be lower than previous values, which will result in a higher loan-to-value ratio when more recent appraisals are completed.

* * * *

44

4.  The following is added immediately following the last paragraph under the heading “Disposition Policies” on page 107 of the Prospectus:

We may pay a disposition fee to our Advisor or its affiliates if they provide a substantial amount of services, as determined by our independent directors, in connection with the sale of an asset.  Please see “Management Compensation, Expense Reimbursements and Operating Partnership Participation Interest.”

* * * *

5.  The following is added immediately following the last bullet point under the heading “Investment Limitations” on page 108 of the Prospectus and describes an additional investment limitation:

• Invest in any entity or in any security of any entity holding investments or engaged in activities prohibited by our charter.

L.  Updates to the Selected Financial Data Section

The disclosure under the heading “Selected Financial Data” on page 110 of the Prospectus is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

The following selected consolidated financial data are qualified by reference to and should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” below.

	2009			2008			2007			2006			2005
	(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Operating Data:
Revenues	$	365,236		$	333,527		$	179,576		$	63,930		$	6,247
Depreciation and amortization	$	124,183		$	122,732		$	68,151		$	22,478		$	3,331
Asset management and acquisition fees	$	27,984		$	42,012		$	29,939		$	17,559		$	5,225
Organizational and offering expenses, net of reversal (1)	$	-		$	3,741		$	7,583		$	5,760		$	(6,630	)
General and administrative,net (2)	$	6,108		$	5,991		$	4,570		$	2,819		$	494
Income (loss) from continuing operations before provision for income taxes and equity in losses of unconsolidated entities, net	$	14,791		$	(146,487	)	$	(77,018	)	$	(35,628	)	$	(1,561	)
Provision for income taxes	$	(1,605	)	$	(2,512	)	$	(1,068	)	$	-		$	-
Equity in losses of unconsolidated entities, net	$	(8,777	)	$	(13,416	)	$	(8,288	)	$	(3,291	)	$	(831	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders	$	414		$	(165,478	)	$	(87,640	)	$	(38,490	)	$	(1,757	)
Income from discontinued operations (5)	$	1,664		$	72		$	-		$	-		$	-
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests	$	(4,065	)	$	(3,065	)	$	(1,266	)	$	429		$	635
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders (3)	$	2,620		$	(165,408	)	$	(87,640	)	$	(38,490	)	$	(1,757	)
Basic and diluted income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders per common share:	$	-		$	(0.90	)	$	(0.70	)	$	(0.79	)	$	(0.16	)
Distributions declared per common share	$	0.62		$	0.64		$	0.62		$	0.61		$	0.60
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted		207,807			183,776			125,776			48,468			11,061
Balance Sheet Data:
Total investment property (4)	$	2,355,872		$	2,374,007		$	1,798,924		$	677,564		$	117,878
Investment in unconsolidated entities	$	379,057		$	364,374		$	361,157		$	307,553		$	118,575
Assets held for sale (5)	$	42,499		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-
Total assets	$	3,339,780		$	3,280,437		$	2,703,623		$	1,213,662		$	297,334
Long-term obligations	$	1,712,722		$	1,691,335		$	1,273,596		$	498,989		$	77,922

(1) Based on actual gross proceeds raised in the initial offering, we were not obligated to reimburse the Advisor for certain organizational and offering costs that were previously accrued by us. Accruals of these costs were reversed in our financial statements during the year ended December 31, 2005.

45

(2)	During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Advisor forgave $1.7 million, which was previously advanced to us for certain corporate-level general and administrative expenses.
(3)	We have revised the presentation of net income to apply the provisions of ASC 810 “Consolidation,” which we adopted on January 1, 2009. As a result, certain adjustments have been made to the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005 to be consistent with the 2009 presentation.

(4) We have revised the presentation of investment property to exclude the value associated with leases in place at the time an investment property is acquired as shown in the consolidated balance sheet to be consistent with a majority of others in the industry. As a result, certain reclassifications have been made to the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 to be consistent with the 2008 and 2009 presentation.

(5) We have classified one property as held for sale as of December 31, 2009. As a result, certain adjustments have been made to the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2008 to be consistent with the 2009 presentation. No adjustments were made to other periods since the property was not acquired until December 2008.

M.  Updates to Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The discussion under the caption “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” beginning on page 111 of the Prospectus is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto incorporated by reference into this prospectus. The following information contains forward-looking statements, which are subject to risks and uncertainties. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Please see “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” included in this prospectus for a description of these risks and uncertainties..

Executive Summary

We were formed in August 2003 for the purpose of investing in and owning interests in real estate. We have invested and continue to invest in real estate to satisfy our primary investment objectives including preserving invested capital, paying regular cash distributions and achieving modest capital appreciation of our assets over the long term. We make investments directly through entities wholly owned by the Operating Partnership or indirectly through other entities such as through our investment in the Core Fund. As of December 31, 2009, we had direct and indirect interests in 63 properties. These properties consist of 45 office properties located throughout the United States, one mixed-use office and retail property in Toronto, Ontario, one industrial property in Dallas, Texas, four industrial properties in Brazil and a portfolio of 12 grocery-anchored shopping centers located in five states primarily in the Southeastern United States (the “Grocery-Anchored Portfolio”). On January 22, 2010 we sold one industrial property located in Curitiba, Brazil and on April 22, 2010, we sold two industrial properties located in Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Our principal targeted assets are office properties that have quality construction, desirable locations and quality tenants. We expect to continue to focus primarily on investments in institutional-quality office properties located in the United States (whether as direct investments or as indirect investments through the Core Fund or otherwise). However, we also intend to continue to pursue other real estate investments that we believe will satisfy our long-term primary objectives of preserving invested capital and achieving modest capital appreciation over the long term, in addition to providing regular cash distributions to our shareholders. To achieve these objectives, we intend to invest in properties which will be diversified by location, lease expirations and tenant industries. In the future, our investments may include additional investments outside of the United States, investments in non-office properties, non-core or development investments, loans, ground leases and investments in other joint ventures.

In order to provide capital for these investments, we raised approximately $2.0 billion in our initial public offering (the “Initial Offering”) and our second public offering  (the “Second Offering”), the latter of which terminated on June 30, 2008. On July 1, 2008, we commenced this public offering (the “Third Offering”) pursuant to which we offered up to $3.5 billion in shares of common stock including $500.0 million in shares of common stock under our dividend reinvestment plan.  Through December 31, 2009, we raised $471.1 million in proceeds from the Third Offering. In consideration of market conditions and other factors, our board of directors determined to cease new sales of the Company’s shares through the Third Offering’s primary offering as of January 1, 2010, a lthough we will continue to sell shares under the Third Offering through our dividend reinvestment plan. The board of directors is considering various future capital raising strategies for the Company, and the Company may resume capital raising in the future under a new offering.

46

Our board of directors and our officers remain focused on carefully managing our cash position and maintaining appropriate levels of liquidity to meet our operating and capital needs in an environment where access to capital in the equity and debt markets remains constrained.  To that end, on November 30, 2009, our board of directors determined that it is in our best interest to suspend our share redemption program until further notice, except with respect to redemption requests made in connection with the death or disability (as defined in the Code) of a shareholder (referred to herein as “Special Redemption Requests”).  Accordingly, all pending redemption requests that were not made in connection with the death or disability of a shareholder were not funded. Any additional such requests received aft er November 30, 2009, were not funded and will not be funded, until further notice.  Special Redemption Requests will be considered for redemption by our board of directors on a quarterly basis, and the fulfillment of any Special Redemption Requests will be subject to the discretion of our board of directors in determining whether we have sufficient funds available for redemptions and will be subject to the other limitations of the share redemption program.

Economic Update

After four quarters of significant GDP declines, the third and fourth quarters of 2009 saw GDP return to growth of approximately 2.2% and 5.6%, respectively.  The largest share of this growth was generated by business rather than consumer or government spending. While GDP news has been positive, unemployment remains very high.  U.S. job losses continued for 22 consecutive months across 2008 and 2009, and in 9 of those months losses exceeded 400,000 jobs per month. In late 2009 and early 2010 the job loss rate has been much less dramatic, but consumer confidence has not been restored enough to increase spending.

Although there have been signs of  recovery in the economy, commercial office real estate fundamentals typically lag the economy and we believe the effects of the economic recession will continue to have an adverse impact on commercial office real estate market fundamentals, including tenant demand, overall occupancies, leasing velocity, rental rates, subletting and tenant defaults. While the recession began in December 2007, the most significant increases in market vacancy occurred in 2009 and will likely continue in 2010. We are proactively managing our portfolio in an effort to minimize the negative impacts to our portfolio during this time.

As with most commercial real estate, our portfolio of assets is not immune to the effects of a recession, however, due to the quality and diversification of our portfolio, we believe that our portfolio is relatively well positioned to limit the negative impact from this down cycle. In spite of the challenges presented by the current economy and markets, our portfolio was 90% leased as of December 31, 2009, compared to our December 31, 2008 leased percentage of 95%. Our management closely monitors the portfolio's lease expirations, which range from 6.6% to 10.3% of leasable square feet per year from now through 2012. We believe this level of expirations is manageable, and we will remain focused on filling tenant vacancies with the highest-quality tenants in each of the markets in which we operate. Although we continue to be leased to a diverse tenant base over a variety of industries, our portfolio is approximately 15% leased to over 225 companies in the financial and insurance industries and is approximately 15% leased to over 125 companies in the legal industry. Despite the recent increase in leasing activities in select markets, most markets where we operate are experiencing lower rental rates and increased landlord funded leasing incentives to tenants associated with new leases and lease renewals.

Declining real estate fundamentals have had a significant negative impact on values of commercial real estate investments. Commercial real estate sales across the U.S. in 2008 and 2009 were dramatically down from the record high volume in 2007, and cap rates have increased across all property types. This has negatively impacted the value of our real estate investments and consequently is expected to negatively impact the estimated value of our shares determined by our board of directors in the future. Investment transaction volume did increase as 2009 progressed, prospective buyers began to underwrite modest market recoveries and sellers adjusted their price expectations downward. Recent demand has been greatest for high quality, well-located assets that generate stable cash flows.  We expect that this trend may lead to increas ed investment activity in 2010.

While we have seen some recent improvements in the debt capital markets, debt capital continues to be difficult to obtain and more expensive. We have managed our portfolio to date in an effort to minimize our exposure to volatility in the debt capital markets. We have done this by using moderate levels of long-term fixed-rate debt and minimizing our exposure to short-term variable-rate debt which is more likely to be impacted by market volatility. Our portfolio was 58% leveraged as of December 31, 2009, with 92% of our debt in the form of long-term, fixed-rate mortgage loans (some of which are effectively fixed through the use of interest rate swaps).

Given the economic environment, the overall decline in the value of most investors’ portfolios and increased liquidity needs of investors, capital raising in 2009 was very difficult and continues to present challenges in 2010.  In consideration of current market conditions and other factors, on November 30, 2009, the board of directors determined to cease new sales of shares in our current offering, other than those pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan, and therefore we are not accepting any subscriptions dated after December 31, 2009.  Our management and board of directors are considering various future capital raising strategies and expects we may resume capital raising in the future under a new offering.  The proceeds that we receive from participants choosing to reinvest distributions in addi tional shares has historically been an important source of capital for us. To the extent that a material number of participants in this program choose to terminate or reduce their level of participation, our capital will be further constrained.  The increased focus on liquidity by our investors resulted in a significant increase in requests to redeem securities near the end of 2008 and in throughout 2009. In November 2009, we suspended our share redemption program except for requests due to death or disability to allow us to preserve more capital to meet our liquidity needs. 

47

Like many other property owners, we have been impacted by the adverse effect of the economy on real estate fundamentals, and as a result of these conditions, as well as our commitment to conservative management of our liquidity position, we declared distributions for the months of July through December 2009 at a per-share amount that is slightly lower than the amount declared for each of the months since our last distribution rate change in May 2008.  Despite these challenges, we were still able to declare distributions equal to $0.62, $0.64 and $0.62 for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.  However, in light of the conditions discussed above, we expect that the level of distributions to our shareholders will decrease in future periods.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Each of our critical accounting policies involves the use of estimates that require management to make judgments that are subjective in nature. Management relies on its experience, collects historical and current market data, and analyzes these assumptions in order to arrive at what it believes to be reasonable estimates. Under different conditions or assumptions, materially different amounts could be reported related to the accounting policies described below. In addition, application of these accounting policies involves the exercise of judgments on the use of assumptions a s to future uncertainties and, as a result, actual results could materially differ from these estimates.

Basis of Presentation

Our consolidated financial statements included in this prospectus include the accounts of Hines REIT and the Operating Partnership (over which Hines REIT exercises financial and operating control) and the Operating Partnership’s wholly-owned subsidiaries as well as the related amounts of noncontrolling interest. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

We evaluate the need to consolidate investments based on standards set forth by GAAP.Our joint ventures are evaluated based upon GAAP to determine whether or not the investment qualifies as a variable interest entity (“VIE”).  If the investment qualifies as VIE, an analysis is then performed to determine if we are the primary beneficiary of the VIE by reviewing a combination of qualitative and quantitative measures including analyzing expected investment portfolio using various assumptions to estimate the net operating income from the underlying assets.  The projected cash flows are then analyzed to determine whether or not we are the primary beneficiary based upon the expected losses and residual returns of each variable interest holder.   In addition to this analysis, we also consider the rights and decision making abilities of each holder of variable interest entity. We will consolidate joint ventures that are determined to be variable interest entities for which we are the primary beneficiary. We will also consolidate joint ventures that are not determined to be variable interest entities, but for which we exercise significant control over major operating decisions, such as approval of budgets, selection of property managers, asset management, investment activity and changes in financing.

Our investments in partially owned real estate joint ventures and partnerships are reviewed for impairment periodically if events or circumstances change indicating that the carrying amount of our investments may not be recoverable.  The ultimate realization of our investments in partially owned real estate joint ventures and partnerships is dependent on a number of factors, including the performance of each investment and market conditions.  In accordance with GAAP, we will record an impairment charge if we determine that a decline in the value of an investment is other than temporary.  Based on our analysis of the facts and circumstances at each reporting period, no impairment was recorded for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.  However, if conditions in the capital and real estate marke ts continue to deteriorate, we may record impairment on these investments in the future.

Investment Property and Lease Intangibles

Real estate assets that we own directly are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method. The estimated useful lives for computing depreciation are generally 10 years for furniture and fixtures, 15-20 years for electrical and mechanical installations and 40 years for buildings. Major replacements that extend the useful life of the assets are capitalized and maintenance and repair costs are expensed as incurred.

Acquisitions of properties are accounted for utilizing the acquisition method and, accordingly, are recorded at the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The results of operations of acquired properties are included in our results of operations from their respective dates of acquisition. Estimates of future cash flows and other valuation techniques that we believe are similar to those used by independent appraisers are used to record the purchase of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed such as land, buildings and improvements, equipment and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities such as amounts related to in-place leases, acquired above- and below-market leases, tenant relationships, asset retirement obligations, mortgage notes payable and any goodwill or gain on purchase. Values of buildings and improvements will be determined on an as if vacant basis. Initial valuations are subject to change until such information is finalized, no later than 12 months from the acquisition date.

48

The estimated fair value of acquired in-place leases are the costs we would have incurred to lease the properties to the occupancy level of the properties at the date of acquisition. Such estimates include the fair value of leasing commissions, legal costs and other direct costs that would be incurred to lease the properties to such occupancy levels. Additionally, we will evaluate the time period over which such occupancy levels would be achieved. Such evaluation will include an estimate of the net market-based rental revenues and net operating costs (primarily consisting of real estate taxes, insurance and utilities) that would be incurred during the lease-up period. Acquired in-place leases as of the date of acquisition are amortized over the remaining lease terms.

Acquired above-and below-market lease values are recorded based on the present value (using an interest rate that reflects the risks associated with the lease acquired) of the difference between the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and management’s estimate of fair market value lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases. The capitalized above- and below-market lease values are amortized as adjustments to rental revenue over the remaining terms of the respective leases, which includes periods covered by bargain renewal options. Should a tenant terminate its lease, the unamortized portion of the in-place lease value is charged to amortization expense and the unamortized portion of out-of-market lease value is charged to rental revenue.

Acquired above- and below-market ground lease values are recorded based on the difference between the present value (using an interest rate that reflects the risks associated with the lease acquired) of the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the ground leases and management’s estimate of fair market value of land under the ground leases. The capitalized above- and below-market lease values are amortized as adjustments to ground lease expense over the lease term.

Real estate assets are reviewed for impairment if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the individual property may not be recoverable. In such an event, a comparison will be made of the current and projected operating cash flows of each property on an undiscounted basis to the carrying amount of such property. Such carrying amount would be adjusted, if necessary, to estimated fair values to reflect impairment in the value of the asset.

Management estimates the fair value of assumed mortgage notes payable based upon indications of then-current market pricing for similar types of debt with similar maturities. Assumed mortgage notes payable are initially recorded at their estimated fair value as of the assumption date, and the difference between such estimated fair value and the note’s outstanding principal balance is amortized over the life of the mortgage note payable.

Deferred Leasing Costs

Direct leasing costs, primarily consisting of third-party leasing commissions and tenant inducements, are capitalized and amortized over the life of the related lease. Tenant inducement amortization is recorded as an offset to rental revenue and the amortization of other direct leasing costs is recorded in amortization expense.

We consider a number of different factors to evaluate whether we or the lessee is the owner of the tenant improvements for accounting purposes. These factors include: 1) whether the lease stipulates how and on what a tenant improvement allowance may be spent; 2) whether the tenant or landlord retains legal title to the improvements; 3) the uniqueness of the improvements; 4) the expected economic life of the tenant improvements relative to the term of the lease; and 5) who constructs or directs the construction of the improvements.

The determination of who owns the tenant improvements for accounting purposes is subject to significant judgment. In making that determination, we consider all of the above factors. No one factor, however, necessarily establishes any determination.

Organizational and Offering Costs

Certain organizational and offering costs related to our Initial Offering and Second Offering have been paid by our Advisor on our behalf. Organizational and offering costs incurred by our Advisor have been analyzed and segregated between those which are organizational in nature, those which are offering-related salaries and other general and administrative expenses of the Advisor and its affiliates, and those which qualify as offering expenses in accordance with GAAP. Organizational costs are expensed as incurred in accordance with GAAP. Offering-related salaries and other general and administrative expenses of the Advisor and its affiliates are expensed as incurred, and third-party offering expenses are taken as a reduction against the net proceeds of the offerings within additional paid-in capital in accordance with GAAP. In addition to the offering costs paid to the Advisor, selling commissions and dealer manager fees were paid to Hines Real Estate Investments, Inc. (“HREI” or the “Dealer Manager”). Such costs are taken as a reduction against the net offering proceeds within additional paid-in capital as well.

On July 1, 2008, we entered into a new advisory agreement in connection with our Third Offering. Pursuant to the terms of the new advisory agreement, we are not obligated to reimburse the Advisor for organizational and offering costs related to the Third Offering. Additionally, the Advisor is not a shareholder of Hines REIT. Accordingly, no amounts of organizational and offering costs incurred by the Advisor in connection with the Third Offering during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 have been recorded in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

49

Revenue Recognition and Valuation of Receivables

We are required to recognize minimum rent revenues on a straight-line basis over the terms of tenant leases, including rent holidays and bargain renewal options, if any. Revenues associated with tenant reimbursements are recognized in the period in which the expenses are incurred based upon the tenant’s lease provision. Revenues related to lease termination fees are recognized at the time that the tenant’s right to occupy the space is terminated and when we have satisfied all obligations under the lease and are included in other revenue in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. To the extent our leases provide for rental increases at specified intervals, we will record a receivable for rent not yet due under the lease terms. Accordingly, our management must determine, in its judgment, to what extent the unbil led rent receivable applicable to each specific tenant is collectible. We review unbilled rent receivables on a quarterly basis and take into consideration the tenant’s payment history, the financial condition of the tenant, business conditions in the industry in which the tenant operates and economic conditions in the area in which the property is located. In the event that the collectability of unbilled rent with respect to any given tenant is in doubt, we would be required to record an increase in our allowance for doubtful accounts or record a direct write-off of the specific rent receivable, which would have an adverse effect on our net income for the year in which the reserve is increased or the direct write-off is recorded and would decrease our total assets and shareholders’ equity.

Derivative Instruments

We have entered into several forward interest rate swap transactions with HSH Nordbank AG, New York Branch (“HSH Nordbank”). These swap transactions were entered into as economic hedges against the variability of future interest rates on the Company’s variable interest rate borrowings with HSH Nordbank. We have not designated any of these contracts as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes. The valuation of the interest rate swaps is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves. The fair values of interest rate swaps are determined using the market standar d methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts (or payments) and the discounted expected variable cash payments (or receipts). The variable cash payments (or receipts) are based on an expectation of future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate curves.

The interest rate swaps have been recorded at their estimated fair value in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008. Changes in the fair value of the interest rate swaps have been recorded in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.

Treatment of Management Compensation, Expense Reimbursements and Operating Partnership Participation Interest

We outsource management of our operations to the Advisor and certain other affiliates of Hines. Fees related to these services are accounted for based on the nature of the service and the relevant accounting literature. Fees for services performed that represent period costs of the Company are expensed as incurred. Such fees include acquisition fees and asset management fees paid to the Advisor and property management fees paid to Hines. In addition to cash payments for acquisition fees and asset management fees paid to the Advisor, an affiliate of the Advisor has received a profits interest in the Operating Partnership related to these services (the “Participation Interest”). As the percentage interest of the Participation Interest is adjusted, the value attributable to such adjustment is charged against earnings and a liabi lity is recorded until it is repurchased for cash or converted into common shares of the Company. In addition, the liability is remeasured at fair value at each balance sheet date with related adjustments charged to earnings in accordance with GAAP. The determination of the adjustment for the Participation Interest is subject to significant judgment.

The conversion and redemption features of the participation interest are accounted for in accordance with GAAP.Redemptions of the Participation Interest for cash will be accounted for as a reduction to the liability discussed above to the extent of such liability, with any additional amounts recorded as a reduction to equity. Conversions into common shares of the Company will be recorded as an increase to the outstanding common shares and additional paid-in capital accounts and a corresponding reduction in the liability discussed above. Redemptions and conversions of the Participation Interest will result in a corresponding reduction in the percentage attributable to the Participation Interest and will have no impact on the calculation of subsequent increases in the Participa tion Interest.

Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

General

Our principal cash requirements are for property-level operating expenses, capital improvements and leasing costs, debt service, corporate-level general and administrative expenses, distributions and redemptions. We have three primary sources of capital for meeting our cash requirements:

• proceeds from our public offerings, including our dividend reinvestment plan;

• debt financings, including secured or unsecured facilities; and

• cash flow generated by our real estate investments and operations.

50

Our cash needs for  additional investments in our properties have been met primarily by proceeds from our public equity offerings and debt financing, while our operating cash needs have primarily been met through cash flow generated by our properties and investments. We believe that our current capital resources, cash flow from operations and proceeds from potential future sales of our real estate investments are sufficient to meet our liquidity needs for the foreseeable future.

 We intend to continue to pay distributions to our shareholders on a quarterly basis. However, as discussed previously, in light of the current economic conditions, we expect that the level of distributions to our shareholders will decrease in future periods.

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

Our direct investments in real estate assets generate cash flow in the form of rental revenues, which are reduced by debt service, direct leasing costs and property-level operating expenses. Property-level operating expenses consist primarily of salaries and wages of property management personnel, utilities, cleaning, insurance, security and building maintenance costs, property management and leasing fees, and property taxes. Additionally, we have incurred corporate-level debt service, general and administrative expenses, asset management and acquisition fees. 

Net cash provided by operating activities was $69.0 million, $40.6 million and $17.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase is primarily due to operating cash flows from properties acquired in previous years.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $108.9 million, $701.6 million and $1,251.8 million, respectively for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007. The decrease is primarily due to a significant reduction in acquisitions completed during each of the last two years. During the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, we had cash outflows of $668.0 million and $1,175.4 million, respectively, related to the acquisition of properties and their related lease intangibles. We did not acquire any direct interests in properties during the year ended December 31, 2009. In addition, we have described certain additional transactions below which may be helpful in understanding changes in our investing cash flows between 2009 and 2008.

     In January 2009, we entered into possession and use agreements with the City of Redmond, Washington, related to a portion of the land owned in connection with the Laguna Buildings, which gave the city immediate use and possession of the land until final terms of the sale were determined and title transferred in December 2009. We received $1.2 million as compensation for this transaction which was recorded in proceeds from sale of land and improvements in the accompanying statement of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2009.

In December 2008, we and an affiliate of Hines sold a 2.8 acre park and waterwall adjacent to Williams Tower to an unrelated third party.  The total sales price was $8.5 million, and the net proceeds to the Company were $4.0 million which was recorded in proceeds from sale of land and improvements in the accompanying statement of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2008.  

During the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 we made no capital contributions to the Core Fund. During the year ended December 31, 2007, we made capital contributions to the Core Fund totaling $58.0 million. During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we received distributions from the Core Fund totaling $6.7 million, $26.9 million and $25.4 million, respectively, which were included in cash flows from investing activities as they exceeded our equity in earnings of the joint venture. The Core Fund decreased the amount of its distributions during 2009 in order to pay down debt and improve its liquidity position and we expect distributions, if any, will be minimal for the next several quarters.

In June 2007, we invested $28.9 million in Distribution Park Rio representing a 50% interest. During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we received distributions from Distribution Park Rio totaling $2.2 million, $2.7 million and $1.0 million, respectively. Approximately $106,000, $509,000 and $594,000 of these amounts were included in cash flows from investing activities as they exceeded our equity in earnings of the joint venture and the remaining amounts were included in operating cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

On November 13, 2008, we acquired a 70.0% non-managing interest in the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio through a joint venture. Concurrently with our initial investment, the joint venture acquired interests in eight of these properties. The joint venture acquired interests in the remaining four properties in the first quarter of 2009. As of December 31, 2009, we had invested $79.9 million in the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio, $23.1 million of which was invested during 2009. During the year ended December 31, 2009, we received distributions from the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio totaling approximately $6.5 million, $6.3 million of which was included in cash flows from investing activities as it exceeded our equity in earnings of the joint venture. $1.8 million of these distributions represented a return of capital originally contributed to the joint venture in the fourth quarter of 2008, which was used to fund a deposit on the joint venture’s mortgage financing.

51

During the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, we had net cash inflows of $1.2 million and $4.6 million, for master leases entered into in connection with our acquisitions. During the year ended December 31, 2007, we had net cash outflows of $5.7 million, for master leases entered into in connection with our acquisitions.

During the year ended December 31, 2009, we had a decrease in restricted cash and marketable securities of $13.3 million. This decrease is primarily related to rent held in escrow of $10.7 million at one of our properties required by its mortgage agreement to be restricted as of year-end, which was subsequently released. During the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, we had increases in restricted cash of approximately $12.8 million and $712,000, respectively, related to certain escrows required by our mortgage agreements of properties acquired during that period.

During the fourth quarter of 2009, we posted additional cash collateral of approximately $106.1 million to rebalance the collateral for the properties under our secured credit facility with HSH Nordbank which is included in additional cash collateral on notes payable in the consolidated statement of cash flows. See “Cash Flows from Financing Activities — Debt Financings” in this section for additional information.

During the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, we had cash outflows related to other assets of $4.9 million and $10.0 million, respectively, primarily as a result of deposits paid on real estate investments that were acquired subsequent to the applicable year-end.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

Public Offerings

During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, we raised proceeds of $250.4 million, $446.3 million and $797.3 million excluding proceeds from the dividend reinvestment plan. The decrease in proceeds received in 2009 and 2008 compared to 2007 is a result of the capital markets and economic environment.  In consideration of market conditions and other factors, our board of directors determined to cease new sales of the Company’s shares through the Third Offering’s primary offering as of January 1, 2010, although we expect to continue to sell shares under the Third Offering through our dividend reinvestment plan. See “ Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Executive Summary” in this prospectus.

We funded redemptions of $152.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to $58.7 million and $10.6 million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007. As indicated previously, we have experienced a significant increase in requests for redemptions during 2009 compared to the same period in 2008, due to the current economic environment and increased liquidity needs of our shareholders. Effective November 30, 2009, we suspended our share redemption program except for redemption requests made in connection with the death or disability of a shareholder.

Payment of Offering and Other Costs and Expenses

In addition to making investments in accordance with our investment objectives, we used our capital resources to pay the Dealer Manager and the Advisor for services they provided to us during the various phases of our offerings and operations. During our offerings, we pay the Dealer Manager selling commissions and dealer manager fees, and during the Second Offering we reimbursed the Advisor for organizational and offering costs. Pursuant to the terms of the Third Offering, we were not obligated to pay organizational and offering costs related to the Third Offering, other than selling commissions and the dealer manager fee. As a result, we have not incurred or paid any organizational or offering costs related to the Third Offering during 2008 or 2009.

During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we paid the Dealer Manager selling commissions of $16.3 million, $29.5 million and $53.8 million, respectively, and dealer manager fees of $5.2 million, $9.8 million and $17.4 million, respectively. All such selling commissions and a portion of such dealer manager fees were reallowed by the Dealer Manager to participating broker dealers for their services in selling our shares. Commissions and dealer manager fees paid during the year ended December 31, 2009 decreased, as compared to 2008 and 2007, primarily as a result of a decrease in capital raised.

Our Second Offering terminated on June 30, 2008. No organizational and offering costs related to the Second Offering were incurred after December 31, 2008. During the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Advisor incurred organizational and offering costs related to the Second Offering totaling $8.0 million and $16.6 million, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 we made payments totaling $10.3 million and $19.3 million, respectively, for Second Offering organizational and offering costs, all of which were reimbursements made to our Advisor. The decrease in the amount of organizational and offering costs paid during 2008 compared to 2007 is due to the termination of the Second Offering in the middle of 2008.

52

Distributions

In order to meet the requirements for being treated as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and to pay regular cash distributions to our shareholders, which is one of our investment objectives, we have declared and expect to continue to declare distributions to shareholders (as authorized by our board of directors) as of daily record dates and aggregate and pay such distributions quarterly.

During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we declared distributions equal to $0.62, $0.64 and $0.62 per share. The distributions declared were authorized and set by our board of directors at a level the board believed to be appropriate based upon the board’s evaluation of our assets, historical and projected levels of cash flow and results of operations, additional capital and debt anticipated to be raised or incurred and invested in the future, the historical and projected timing between receiving offering proceeds and investing such proceeds in real estate investments, and general market conditions and trends. However, as discussed above, in light of the current economic environment and its impact on our real estate portfolio, we expect that the level of d istributions to our shareholders will decrease in future periods.

For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we funded our cash distributions with cash flows from operating activities and distributions received from our unconsolidated entities.

Debt Financings

We use debt financing from time to time for acquisitions and investments as well as for property improvements, tenant improvements, leasing commissions and other working capital needs. We may obtain financing at the time an asset is acquired or an investment is made or at such later time as determined to be appropriate, depending on market conditions and other factors.

During the year ended December 31, 2009, we received debt proceeds of $290.0 million and made payments of $244.5 million related to borrowings under our revolving credit facility. We use proceeds from our revolving credit facility to make capital contributions related to acquisitions, fund general working capital needs and to make principal payments on other debts as described above. Our revolving credit facility expires in October 2010, but is subject to extension at our election for one additional year, subject to compliance with certain covenants. In accordance with the provisions of the revolving credit facility agreement, we expect to re-appraise our properties during the 2nd quarter of 2010. Given the current economic environment, we expect the values of some or all of the properties will be lower than previous values. Accordingly, we may not comply with certain covenants of this credit facility which could limit our availability of funds under our revolving credit facility and limit our ability to extend this facility or negotiate a new revolving credit facility. To the extent we remain in compliance with such covenants, we intend to exercise our option to  extend this facility prior to its maturity in October 2010. If we do not meet the financial covenants, we would expect to negotiate a new revolving credit facility.

In addition, upon execution of the extension of the maturity date on the Airport Corporate Center debt, we made a principal payment of $13.1 million to reduce the outstanding principal balance to $77.9 million. This extension expired on March 11, 2010, at which time we refinanced this loan with a two-year mortgage loan. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations —  Recent Developments and Subsequent Events” in this prospectus. The remaining $1.0 million of debt payments relate to amortizing loans at certain of our properties.

As of December 31, 2009, we had $520.0 million outstanding under a secured credit facility with HSH Nordbank. HSH Nordbank has the right to have the properties serving as collateral under this credit facility appraised every two years. Should the aggregate outstanding principal amounts under this facility exceed 55% of the lender’s appraised values, we must rebalance through making a partial payment or providing additional collateral to eliminate such excess. Subject to this requirement, during the fourth quarter of 2009, we posted additional cash collateral of approximately $106.1 million to rebalance the collateral for the properties under this credit facility which is included in additional cash collateral on notes payable in the consolidated statement of cash flows. This cash collateral was primarily funded with a bor rowing under our revolving credit facility. Considering the declining real estate values, the Company could be required to pay additional amounts to rebalance the collateral for the properties under this credit facility.

As of December 31, 2009, our debt financing was approximately 58% of the estimated aggregate value of our real estate investments (including our pro rata share of real estate assets and related debt owned through our investments in other entities such as the Core Fund) compared with 55% and 54%, at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. As of December 31, 2009, this percentage was based upon our most recent appraised values, which for many of our assets, were completed more than one year ago. As mentioned above, given the current economic environment, we expect the values of some or all of our properties will be lower than previous values, which will result in a higher loan-to-value ratio.

53

During the year ended December 31, 2008, we entered into $251.0 million of permanent mortgage financing related to our wholly-owned property acquisitions. We also assumed a mortgage with a principal balance of $54.2 million related to our acquisition of the Raytheon/DirecTV Buildings and three mortgage loans with principal balances totaling $35.8 million related to our acquisition of 345 Inverness Drive and the Arapahoe Business Parks. These mortgages were primarily interest-only and had terms that varied from five to eight years with a weighted average interest rate of 5.51%. In addition, we received proceeds of $395.5 million and made debt payments of $380.2 million, primarily related to borrowings under our revolver.

During the year ended December 31, 2007, we entered into $863.2 million of permanent mortgage financing related to our wholly-owned property acquisitions. These mortgages were primarily interest-only and had terms that varied from five to 10 years with a weighted average interest rate of 5.63%. In addition, we received proceeds of $416.7 million and made debt payments of $578.8 million, primarily related to borrowings under our revolver.

Results of Operations

Year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008

Results for our Directly-Owned Properties

We owned 25 properties directly that were 91% leased as of December 31, 2009 compared to 25 properties that were 95% leased as of December 31, 2008. The following table presents the property-level revenues and expenses for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to the same period in 2008. Same-store properties for the year ended December 31, 2009 include all properties owned as of January 1, 2008. Revenues and expenses for properties acquired after January 1, 2008 are included in “Recent Acquisitions.” Please note, the following analysis excludes the activity of one property which was held for sale as of December 31, 2009. All amounts are in thousands, except for percentages:

	Years Ended December 31,				Change
	2009		2008		$		%
Property revenues
Same-store properties	$	273,064	$	275,844	$	(2,780)		(1.0)	%
Recent acquisitions		92,172		57,683		34,489		59.8	%
Total property revenues	$	365,236	$	333,527	$	31,709		9.5	%
Property expenses (1)
Same-store properties	$	206,048	$	217,189	$	(11,141)		(5.1)	%
Recent acquisitions		70,141		47,890		22,251		46.5	%
Total property expenses	$	276,189	$	265,079	$	11,110		4.2	%
Property revenues in excess of expenses
Same-store properties	$	67,016	$	58,655	$	8,361		14.3	%
Recent acquisitions		22,031		9,793		12,238		125.0	%
Total property revenues in excess of expenses	$	89,047	$	68,448	$	20,599		30.1	%
Interest income/expense
Interest expense	$	91,538	$	83,111	$	8,427		10.1	%
Interest income	$	472	$	3,544	$	(3,072)		(86.7)	%

__________

(1)   Property expenses include property operating expenses, real property taxes, property management fees, depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, other losses and income taxes.

As indicated above, the changes in property revenues and expenses between the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 were primarily due to acquisitions made during 2008. The margin of property revenues in excess of property expenses for same-store properties increased by 14.3% during the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to the same period in 2008. The increase in this margin is primarily due to decreased depreciation and amortization resulting from fully amortized lease intangibles.

The increase in interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 is primarily due to increased borrowings related to our acquisitions of directly-owned properties. Average debt outstanding during the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $1.6 billion and $1.4 billion, respectively. The decrease in interest income is primarily due to lower interest rates on cash we held in short-term investments during delays between raising capital and acquiring real estate investments.

54

        As a result of future potential acquisitions or disposals, our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2009 could differ from our results of operations in future periods.

Sale of Investment Property

In January 2009, we entered into possession and use agreements with the City of Redmond, Washington, related to a portion of the land owned in connection with the Laguna Buildings, which gave the city immediate use and possession of the land until final terms of the sale were determined and title transferred in December 2009. We received $1.2 million as compensation for this transaction which was recorded in proceeds from sale of land and improvements in the accompanying statement of cash flows. This transaction resulted in a gain of $612,000, which is reflected in “Gain on sale of real estate” in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.

In December 2008, the Company and an affiliate of Hines sold a 2.8 acre park and waterwall adjacent to Williams Tower to an unrelated third party.  The total sales price was $8.5 million, and the net proceeds to the Company were $4.0 million.  The Company’s basis in the property was approximately $4.3 million, of which $4.1 million was assigned to land and $152,000 was assigned to the waterwall. As a result of the sale, the Company recognized an impairment of $254,000 which is reflected in “Other” in the accompanying statement of operations.  Subsequent to the sale, the Company entered into an agreement with the buyer which allows  the Company to continue to manage the daily activities of the park and waterwall. The Company will be responsible for certain maintenance costs, a majo rity of which are collected from the tenants of Williams Tower through operating expense recoveries, and the buyer will be responsible for all capital improvements and costs associated with the waterwall operations. The results of operations from the park and waterwall for 2008 were a loss of approximately $52,000.  These operations are classified in the accompanying statement of operations as continuing operations, due to the fact that these expenses and revenues will continue to be recognized by the Company in future periods given the management agreement entered into between the Company and the buyer.

In October 2009, we entered into a sale agreement with an unaffiliated third party to sell a land parcel we acquired in connection with our acquisition of Williams Tower in May 2008. According to the terms of the sale agreement, the land parcel is expected to be sold in 2010 for approximately $12.8 million. Per the terms of the sale agreement, the purchaser has a six month due diligence period in which it can terminate the contract for any reason, without penalty.  Accordingly, there can be no assurances that this transaction will be consummated. We recorded an impairment charge of $3.4 million, which is included in other losses in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. The amount of the impairment charge was determined based on the expected sale price specified in the executed sale agreement.

No impairment charges were recorded during the year ended December 31, 2009 other than the impairment charge described above. However, if market conditions continue to deteriorate and result in lower valuations or reduced cash flows of our properties, additional impairment charges may be recorded in future periods.

Discontinued Operations

On January 22, 2010, we sold Distribution Park Araucaria, an industrial property located in Curitiba, Brazil which we acquired in December 2008. The sales price was $38.4 million (69.9 million BRL translated at a rate of 1.818 BRL per $1 USD). We classified the property as an asset held for sale in accordance with GAAP. In connection with the sale of Distribution Park Araucaria, we paid our Advisor a disposition fee of approximately $384,000. The results of operations of Distribution Park Araucaria for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 are as follows (amounts in thousands):

		2009		2008
		(In thousands)
Revenues:
Rental revenue		$	4,586	$	172
Other revenue			-		-
	Total revenues		4,586		172
Expenses:
Property operating expenses			290		8
Real property taxes			182		25
Property management fees			74		-
Depreciation and amortization			1,888		67
	Total expenses		2,434		100
Income from discontinued operations before taxes			2,152		72
Income taxes			488		-
Income from discontinued operations		$	1,664	$	72

55

Results for our Indirectly-Owned Properties

As of December 31, 2009, we owned a 28.7% non-managing general partner interest in the Core Fund, which held interests in 25 properties that were 88% leased. As of December 31, 2008, we owned a 28.7% non-managing general partner interest in the Core Fund, which held interests in 25 properties that were 91% leased. Our equity in losses related to our investment in the Core Fund for the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $11.0 million and $15.6 million, respectively. The decrease in our equity in losses of the Core Fund in 2009 is primarily due to an impairment charge recorded on one of its properties in 2008, our share of which amounted to $3.1 million. No similar charges were recorded in 2009.

We own a 70% non-managing interest in the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio, a portfolio of 12 grocery-anchored shopping centers located in five states primarily in the southeastern United States. Our equity in earnings related to our investment in the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was approximately $129,000 and $28,000, respectively.

We own a 50% non-managing interest in Distribution Park Rio, an industrial property located in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Our equity in earnings related to our investment in Distribution Park Rio for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was approximately $2.1 million and $2.2 million, respectively.

CORPORATE-LEVEL ACTIVITIES

Corporate-level activities include results related to derivative instruments, asset management and acquisition fees, general and administrative expenses as well as other expenses which are not directly related to our property operations.

Derivative Instruments

We have entered into several interest rate swap transactions with HSH Nordbank as economic hedges against the variability of future interest rates on our variable interest rate borrowings. We have not designated any of these contracts as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes. The interest rate swaps have been recorded at their estimated fair value in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008. The gain or loss on derivative instruments recorded during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 is the result of changes in the fair value of interest rate swaps during each period. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” in this prospectus for additional information regarding certain risks related to our derivatives, such as the risk of counterparty non-performance.

We recorded a gain of $49.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 and a loss of $85.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 due to changes in the values of our interest rate swaps. We expect to hold the underlying investments to their maturities. As a result, we do not expect to settle these interim gains and losses.

Other Corporate-level Activities

The tables below provide detail relating to our asset management and acquisition fees and general and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.  All amounts in thousands, except percentages:

	Years Ended December 31,				Change
	2009		2008		$		%
Asset Management and Acquisition Fees	$	27,984	$	42,012	$	(14,028)		(33.4)	%
General and Administrative Expenses		6,108		5,991		117		2.0	%

We pay monthly asset management fees to our Advisor based on the amount of net equity capital invested in real estate investments and pay acquisition fees to our Advisor based on the purchase prices of our real estate investments. A portion of these fees is paid in cash and the remainder is satisfied through the participation interest (see Management’s Discussion and Analysis — Critical Accounting Policies — Treatment of Management Compensation, Expense Reimbursements and Operating Partnership Participation Interest for additional information regarding the participation interest). The decrease in asset management and acquisition fees for the year ended December 31, 2009 is the result of: (i) a $4.4 million increase in asset management fees due to an increase in the amount of net equity capital invested in real estate in vestments, (ii) a $14.4 million decrease in acquisition fees due to reduced acquisition activity and (iii) a $4.0 million reduction of asset management and acquisition fees resulting from fair value adjustments of the Participation Interest liability recorded in the current year compared to those recorded in the prior year.

56

General and administrative expenses include legal and accounting fees, insurance costs, costs and expenses associated with our board of directors and other administrative expenses. Certain of these costs are variable, which may increase in the future if we raise capital in potential future offerings and make additional real estate investments.

Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, affiliates of Hines owned 3.3% and 2.7% interests, respectively, in the Operating Partnership. As a result, we allocated income of approximately $4.1 million and $3.1 million, respectively, to the holders of these noncontrolling interests for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.

Year ended December 31, 2008 compared to the year ended December 31, 2007

Results for our Directly-Owned Properties

We owned 25 properties directly that were 95% leased as of December 31, 2008 compared to 16 properties that were 94% leased as of December 31, 2007. The following table presents the property-level revenues and expenses for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to the same period in 2007. Same-store properties for the year ended December 31, 2008 include all properties owned as of January 1, 2007 as well as the Laguna Buildings, which were acquired on January 3, 2007. Revenues and expenses for properties acquired after January 3, 2007 are included in “Recent Acquisitions.” Please note the following analysis excludes one property which was held for sale as of December 31, 2009. All amounts are in thousands, except for percentages:

	Year Ended December 31,						Change
	2008			2007			$				%
Property revenues
Same-store properties		$	114,651		$	111,088		$	3,563		3.2	%
Recent acquisitions			218,876			68,488			150,388		219.6	%
Total property revenues		$	333,527		$	179,576		$	153,951		85.7	%
Property expenses (1)
Same-store properties		$	87,809		$	89,191		$	(1,382	)	(1.5	)%
Recent acquisitions			177,270			58,457			118,813		203.2	%
Total property expenses		$	265,079		$	147,648		$	117,431		79.5	%
Property revenues in excess of expenses
Same-store properties		$	26,842		$	21,897		$	4,945		22.6	%
Recent acquisitions			41,606			10,031			31,575		314.8	%
Total property revenues in excess of expenses		$	68,448		$	31,928		$	36,520		114.4	%
Interest income/expense
Interest expense		$	83,111		$	47,835		$	35,276		73.7	%
Interest income		$	3,544			5,321		$	(1,777	)	(33.4	)%

__________

(1)   Property expenses include property operating expenses, real property taxes, property management fees, depreciation and amortization of real estate assets and income taxes.

As indicated above, the increases in property revenues and expenses between 2008 and 2007 were primarily due to acquisitions made in those years. Revenues and expenses from our same-store properties were comparable between both years. The margin of property revenues in excess of property expenses for same-store properties increased by 22.6% during the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007. The increase in the margins is primarily due to a decrease in depreciation and amortization resulting from fully depreciated lease intangibles.

The increase in interest expense is primarily due to increased borrowings related to our acquisitions of directly-owned properties. Average debt outstanding during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 was $1,373.2 million and $848.9 million, respectively. The decrease in interest income is primarily due to a reduction in the amount of cash we held in short-term investments during delays between raising capital and acquiring real estate investments and lower interest rates.

57

Results for our Indirectly-Owned Properties

As of December 31, 2008, we owned a 28.7% non-managing general partner interest in the Core Fund, which held interests in 25 properties that were 91% leased. By comparison, we owned a 32.0% interest in the Core Fund as of December 31, 2007, which held interests in 24 properties that were 92% leased.

Our equity in losses related to our investment in the Core Fund for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 was $15.6 million and $8.7 million, respectively. The increase is related to the net loss of the Core Fund, which increased to $52.1 million from $26.5 million. Our equity in the Core Fund's 2008 net loss included $3.1 million resulting from an impairment charge recorded at one of the Core Fund's properties, and the remaining increase was primarily attributable to additional depreciation and amortization resulting from its recent acquisitions.

We own a 50% non-managing interest in Distribution Park Rio, which we acquired in July 2007. Our equity in earnings related to our investment in Distribution Park Rio for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 was approximately $2.2 million and $385,000, respectively. The increase is due to owning our interest in Distribution Park Rio for the entire year in 2008 compared to six months in 2007 and decreased amortization resulting from fully depreciated lease intangibles.

Corporate-level Activities

Corporate-level activities include results related to derivative instruments, asset management and acquisition fees, general and administrative expenses as well as other expenses which are not directly related to our property operations.

Derivative Instruments

As previously described, we have entered into several interest rate swap transactions with HSH Nordbank as economic hedges against the variability of future interest rates on our variable interest rate borrowings. The interest rate swaps have been recorded at their estimated fair value in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2008.

In addition, on February 8, 2007, we entered into a foreign currency contract related to the acquisition of Atrium on Bay, a mixed-use office and retail property located in Toronto, Ontario. The contract was entered into as an economic hedge against the variability of the foreign currency exchange rate related to our equity investment and was settled at the close of this acquisition on February 26, 2007.  As indicated by the table below, the increase in losses on derivative instruments during 2008 is primarily due to the decrease in the fair value of the derivatives resulting from decreasing interest rates. We expect to hold the underlying investments to their maturities. As a result, we do not expect to realize these interim gains and losses.

Period	Decrease in Fair Value			Transaction Fees			Foreign Currency Gain		Loss on Derivative Instruments, net
Year Ended December 31, 2008	$	(85,880	)	$	—		$	—	$	(85,880	)
Year Ended December 31, 2007	$	(25,750	)	$	(731	)	$	939	$	(25,542	)

Other Corporate-level Activities

The tables below provide detail relating to our asset management and acquisition fees and general and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.  All amounts in thousands, except percentages:

	Year Ended December 31,				Change
	2008		2007		$		%
Asset Management and Acquisition Fees	$	42,012	$	29,939	$	12,073		40.3	%
General and Administrative Expenses	$	5,991	$	4,570	$	1,421		31.1	%

58

The increase in asset management and acquisition fees resulted from an increase in acquisitions that we made during the year and a larger portfolio of assets under management.

General and administrative expenses include legal and accounting fees, insurance costs, costs and expenses associated with our board of directors and other administrative expenses. The increase in general and administrative expenses is primarily due to increased costs of shareholder communications, audit and legal fees as the Company’s activities and shareholder base continued to grow.

Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, affiliates of Hines owned 2.7% and 2.4% interests, respectively, in the Operating Partnership. We allocated income of approximately $3.1 million and $1.3 million, respectively, to the holders of these noncontrolling interests for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.

  Modified Funds from Operations

Modified funds from operations (“MFFO”) is a non-GAAP supplemental financial performance measure that our management uses in evaluating the operating performance of the Company.  It includes funds generated by the operations of our real estate investments and funds used in the Company’s corporate-level operations.  Similar to Funds from Operations (“FFO”), a non-GAAP financial performance measure defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) widely recognized as a measure of operating performance, MFFO excludes items such as depreciation and amortization.  However, changes in the accounting and reporting rules under GAAP that have been put into effect since the establishment of NAREIT’s definition of FFO have prompted a significant increase i n the magnitude of non-cash and non-operating items included in FFO, as defined. Such  items include amortization of certain in-place lease intangible assets and liabilities and the amortization of certain tenant incentives. MFFO excludes these items, the effects of straight-line rent revenue recognition, fair value adjustments to derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment, non-cash impairment charges and certain other items as described in the footnotes below, and also includes items such as master lease rental receipts, which are excluded from net income (loss) and FFO, but which we consider in the evaluation of the operating performance of our real estate investments.  We believe that MFFO reflects the overall impact on the performance of our real estate investments of occupancy rates, rental rates, property operating costs, as well as corporate-level general and administrative expenses and interest costs, which is not immediately apparent from net i ncome (loss).  As such, we believe MFFO, in addition to net income (loss) and cash flows from operating activities as defined by GAAP, is a meaningful supplemental performance measure and is useful in understanding how our management evaluates the Company’s ongoing operating performance.

However, MFFO should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) or to cash flows from operating activities and is not intended to be used as a liquidity measure indicative of cash flow available to fund the Company’s cash needs.  Additionally, please see the limitations listed below associated with the use of MFFO as compared to net income (loss):

· MFFO excludes gains (losses) related to changes in estimated values of derivative instruments related to our interest rate swaps.  Although we expect to hold these instruments to maturity, if we were to settle these instruments currently, it would have an impact on our operations.

· MFFO excludes the Participation Interest component of the acquisition and asset management fees.  Although we believe the settlement of this liability will be funded using proceeds from the sale of properties in the future, if we were to settle it currently it would have an impact on our operations.

· MFFO excludes impairment charges related to long-lived assets that have been written down to current market valuations. Although these losses are included in the calculation of net income (loss), we have excluded them from MFFO because we believe doing so more appropriately presents the operating performance of our real estate investments on a comparative basis.

· MFFO excludes organizational and offering expenses and acquisition expenses payable to our Advisor.  Although these amounts reduce net income, we fund such costs with proceeds from our offering and acquisition-related indebtedness and do not consider these expenses in the evaluation of the operating performance of the Company and determining MFFO.

59

 The table below summarizes MFFO for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 and a reconciliation of such non-GAAP financial performance measure to our net income (loss) for the periods then ended (in thousands). Please note, we have previously disclosed Operating Funds Generated by the Company (“OFG”) for the year ended December 31, 2008. Although the calculation of OFG and MFFO are the same, we have changed the name to be consistent with industry practice.

	Year Ended		Year Ended
	December 31, 2009		December 31, 2008
Net income (loss)	$	6,685	$	(162,343)
Adjustments:
Depreciation and amortization (1)		126,071		122,798
(Gain) loss on derivative instruments (2)		(49,297)		85,880
Participation interest expense (3)		12,424		18,648
Impairment on land parcel (4)		3,415		-
Other components of revenues and expenses (5)		(15,682)		(13,431)
Master lease rents (6)		1,200		6,984
Organizational and offering expenses (7)		-		3,741
Acquisition fees (7)		1,160		11,141
Adjustments to equity in losses from unconsolidated entities, net (8)		42,334		47,041
Adjustments for noncontrolling interests (9)		(3,912)		(3,078)
Modified Funds From Operations	$	124,398	$	117,381
Modified Funds From Operations Per Common Share	$	0.60	$	0.64
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding		207,807		183,776

1)	Represents the depreciation and amortization of various real estate assets.  Historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, we believe that such depreciation and amortization may be of limited relevance in evaluating current operating performance and, as such, these items are excluded from our determination of MFFO. This amount includes $1.9 million and approximately $67,000 of depreciation and amortization related to discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
2)	Represents components of net income (loss) related to the estimated changes in the values of our interest rate swap derivatives.  We have excluded these changes in value from our evaluation of the operating performance of the Company and MFFO because we expect to hold the underlying instruments to their maturity and accordingly the interim gains or losses will remain unrealized.
3)	Represents the portion of the acquisition and asset management fees that are paid in equity, which we expect will be settled in the future using proceeds from the sale of properties or other non-operating sources, and which we therefore do not consider in evaluating the operating performance of the Company and determining MFFO.
4)	Represents an impairment charge recorded in the 3rd quarter of 2009 in accordance with the Property, Plant and Equipment topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Although such charges are included in the calculation of net income (loss), we have excluded them from MFFO because we believe doing so more appropriately presents the operating performance of our real estate investments on a comparative basis.
5)	Includes the following components of revenues and expenses that we do not consider in evaluating the operating performance of the Company and determining MFFO for the years ended December 31, 2009 and  2008 (in thousands):

	Year Ended		Year Ended
	December 31, 2009		December 31, 2008
Straight-line rent adjustment (a)	$	(9,435)	$	(16,388)
Amortization of lease incentives (b)		5,306		4,218
Amortization of out-of-market leases (b)		(14,748)		(4,336)
Amortization of deferred financing costs (b)		2,783		1,699
Other		412		1,376
	$	(15,682)	$	(13,431)

a )  Represents the adjustments to rental revenue as required by GAAP to recognize minimum lease payments on a straight-line basis over the respective lease terms.  We have excluded these adjustments from our evaluation of the operating performance of the Company and in determining MFFO because we believe that the rent that is billable during the current period is a more relevant measure of the Company’s operating performance for such period.

60

	b	)	Represents the amortization of lease incentives, out-of-market leases and deferred financing costs.  As stated in Note 1 above, historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, we believe that such amortization may be of limited relevance in evaluating current operating performance and, as such, these items are excluded from our determination of MFFO.
6	)	Includes master lease rents related to master leases entered into in conjunction with certain asset acquisitions. In accordance with GAAP, these rents are not included in rental revenue; however, we consider this rent in evaluating the operating performance of the Company and determining MFFO.
7	)	Represents organizational and offering expenses and acquisition fees paid to our Advisor that are expensed in our consolidated statements of operations. We fund such costs with proceeds from our offering and acquisition-related indebtedness, and therefore do not consider these expenses in evaluating the operating performance of the Company and determining MFFO.
8	)	Includes adjustments to equity in losses of unconsolidated entities, net, similar to those described in Notes 1, 5 and 6 above for our unconsolidated entities, which are necessary to convert the Company's share of income (loss) from unconsolidated entities to MFFO.
9	)	Includes income attributable to noncontrolling interests and all adjustments to eliminate the noncontrolling interests’ share of the adjustments to convert the Company’s net income (loss) to MFFO.

Set forth below is additional information relating to certain items excluded from the analysis above which may be helpful in assessing our operating results.

·   Pursuant to the terms of the Grocery Anchored Portfolio joint venture agreement, for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, we received distributions of approximately $1.7 million and $161,000 in excess of our pro-rata share of the joint venture’s MFFO, respectively.

·   We received $4.0 million in net proceeds from our sale of the Williams Tower waterwall and park in December 2008. See additional information in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources — Results of Operations — Sale of Investment Property” included elsewhere in this prospectus.

·   We received $1.2 million in net proceeds from our sale of land owned in connection with the Laguna Buildings in December 2009. See additional information in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources — Results of Operations — Sale of Investment Property” included elsewhere in this prospectus.

Related-Party Transactions and Agreements

We have entered into agreements with the Advisor, Dealer Manager and Hines or its affiliates, whereby we pay certain fees and reimbursements to these entities, including acquisition fees, selling commissions, dealer manager fees, asset and property management fees, leasing fees, construction management fees, debt financing fees, re-development construction management fees, reimbursement of organizational and offering expenses, and reimbursement of certain operating costs, as described previously.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

61

Contractual Obligations

The following table lists our known contractual obligations as of December 31, 2009. Specifically included are our obligations under long-term debt agreements, operating lease agreements and outstanding purchase obligations (in thousands):

	Payments due by Period
Contractual Obligation	Less Than 1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		More Than 5 Years		Total
Notes payable (1)	$	223,305	$	360,370	$	554,756	$	874,947	$	2,013,378
Ground lease obligation		420		865		900		9,434		11,619
Total contractual obligations (2)	$	223,725	$	361,235	$	555,656	$	884,381	$	2,024,997

__________

(1)

Notes payable includes principal and interest payments on mortgage agreements and principal payments related to the revolving credit facility outstanding as December 31, 2009. Interest payments due to HSH Nordbank were determined using effective interest rates which were fixed as a result of interest rate swaps. Under the terms of each swap transaction, we have agreed to make monthly payments at fixed rates of interest and will receive monthly payments from HSH Nordbank based on 1-month LIBOR.  See “Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources — Debt Financings” for further information.

(2)

Excluded from the table above is the settlement of the $57.8 million liability related to the Participation Interest. Although we expect to settle this liability in the future, we are not currently able to estimate the date on which the settlement will occur.

Recent Developments and Subsequent Events

KeyBank Activity

From January 1, 2010 through April 23, 2010, we borrowed $29.0 million and repaid $16.0 million under our revolving credit facility with KeyBank resulting in an outstanding principal balance of $74.5 million as of April 23, 2010.

Sale of Brazil Industrial Assets

 On January 22, 2010, we sold Distribution Park Araucaria, an industrial property located in Curitiba, Brazil. See “Results of Operations — Year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the Year ended December 31, 2008 — Results for our Directly-Owned Properties — Discontinued Operations” for further information.

On April 22, 2010, we sold Distribution Park Elouveira and Distribution Park Vinhedo, two industrial properties located in Sao Paulo, Brazil. The aggregate sales price was $102.5 million  (181.0 million BRL translated at a rate of 1.765 BRL per $1 USD). In connection with the sale of these properties, we expect to pay our Advisor a disposition fee of approximately $1.0 million.

Airport Corporate Center Mortgage

On March 11, 2010, we refinanced Airport Corporate Center’s mortgage with Westdeutsche Immobilienbank AG. The new mortgage loan is a $65.0 million, two-year, interest-only loan with a variable interest rate equal to LIBOR plus 5.50%. This mortgage was entered into by a subsidiary of the Operating Partnership, but is guaranteed by Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.

Core Fund Debt Compliance

In April 2010, the Core Fund delivered appraisals and corresponding covenant compliance calculations as of December 31, 2009 to a lender in accordance with the terms of two revolving credit facility agreements entered into by two of its subsidiaries.  The calculations indicated that one of the Core Fund’s subsidiaries is not in compliance with certain financial covenants under the agreement.  The Core Fund’s management expects to solicit a waiver from the lenders related to the non-compliance with these covenants while they attempt to renegotiate and amend the terms of the credit agreement, which is expected to include an extension of the maturity date. 

62

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Market risk is the exposure to loss resulting from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and equity prices. The primary risks in pursuing our business plan are interest rate risk and foreign currency exchange risk.

We are exposed to the effects of interest rate changes primarily as a result of our revolving credit facility, which bears interest at a variable rate.  We typically use this facility on a short-term basis to maintain liquidity and fund expansion of our real estate investment portfolio and operations. As of December 31, 2009, we had $61.5 million outstanding under this facility, and the weighted average interest rate on outstanding borrowings was 2.0%.  Annual interest expense would increase $615,000 for every 1% increase in interest rates on this balance.

As of December 31, 2009, we also had $520.0 million of debt outstanding under our HSH Credit Facility, which is a variable-rate pooled mortgage facility. However, as a result of the interest rate swap agreements entered into with HSH Nordbank, these borrowings effectively bear interest at fixed rates ranging from 5.25% to 6.03%.  We are exposed to credit risk of the counterparty to these interest rate swap agreements in the event of non-performance under the terms of the derivative contracts.  In the event of non-performance by the counterparty, we would be subject to the variability of interest rates on the debt outstanding under the HSH Credit Facility to which our outstanding interest rate swaps relate. Please see “Debt Financings” above for more information concerning the Company’s outs tanding debt.

We currently have investments in Canada and Brazil and as a result are subject to risk from the effects of exchange rate movements of foreign currencies, which may affect future costs and cash flows. For all currencies we are currently a net receiver of the foreign currency (we receive more cash than we pay out), and therefore our foreign operations benefit from a weaker U.S. dollar and are adversely affected by a stronger U.S. dollar relative to the foreign currency. Generally, we have not entered into any foreign currency forward exchange contracts to hedge the effects of adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. We have obtained non-recourse mortgage financing at a fixed rate of interest in the local currency related to our property in Toronto, Canada. To the extent that currency fluctuations increase or decrease net op erating income as translated to U.S. dollars, the change in debt service, as translated to U.S. dollars, will partially offset the effect of fluctuations in net operating income, and, to some extent, mitigate the risk from changes in foreign currency rates. Our investment in Toronto, Ontario had shareholders’ equity of $50.7 million and net income of $1.7 million as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009.  A currency exchange rate fluctuation of 10% would have changed our consolidated shareholders’ equity and net income by $5.1 million and $169,000, respectively, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009.  Excluding our assets held for sale, our directly owned properties in Brazil had shareholders’ equity of $106.5 million and net income of $3.6 million as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009, respectively.  A currency exchange rate fluctuation of 10% would have changed our consolidated shareholders’ equity and net income by $10.7 mi llion and approximately $358,000, respectively, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009.  Additionally, in Brazil we have a $30.6 million investment in an unconsolidated entity, in which we had equity in earnings of $2.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009.  A currency exchange rate fluctuation of 10% would have changed our investment in unconsolidated entities and equity in earnings by $3.1 million and approximately $214,000, respectively, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009. 

N.   Updates to the Description of Capital Stock Section

The last paragraph on page 136 of the Prospectus and the disclosure at the top of page 137 of the Prospectus under “Description of Capital Stock — Distribution Objectives” is updated and supplemented with the following:

    The table below outlines our total distributions declared to shareholders and noncontrolling interests for the year ended December 31, 2009, including the breakout between the distributions paid in cash and those reinvested pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan (all amounts are in thousands).

	Shareholders						Noncontrolling Interests
Year Ended	Cash Distributions		Dividends Reinvested		Total Declared		Total Declared
December 31, 2009	$	62,365	$	66,838	$	129,203	$	4,065

For the year ended December 31, 2009, we funded our cash distributions with cash flows from operating activities and distributions received from our unconsolidated investments.

See section C of this Supplement for additional changes to the "Description of Capital Stock" section of the Prospectus.

O.  Update to the Plan of Distribution Section

The following new subsection is hereby inserted immediately after the “Admission of Shareholders” subsection in the “Plan of Distribution” section on page 149:

63

Investments through IRA Accounts

Community National Bank has agreed to act as an IRA custodian for investors who would like to purchase shares through an IRA.  For any accountholder that makes an investment on or after October 29, 2009equal to or greater than $10,000 in shares of our common stock through an IRA for which Community National Bank serves as custodian, we will pay the base fee for the first calendar year and an affiliate of Hines will pay the base fee for each successive year.  Beginning on the date that their accounts are established, all investors will be responsible for any other fees applicable to their accounts.  Further information about custodial services is available through your broker or through our Dealer Manager.  See “Questions and Answers About This Offering – Who can help answer my questions?” for the Dealer Manager’s contact information.  

P.  Updates to the Operating Partnership Section

1.  The last paragraph under the heading “General” on page 151 of the Prospectus is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

We hold substantially all of our assets through the Operating Partnership. We are the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership and, as of December 31, 2009, we owned a 96.7% ownership interest in the Operating Partnership and Hines 2005 VS I LP, an affiliate of Hines, owned a 0.5% ownership interest in the Operating Partnership. Finally, HALP Associates Limited Partnership owned the Participation Interest in the Operating Partnership, which represented a 2.8% ownership interest as of December 31, 2009. Please see “— The Participation Interest” below. As the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, we have the exclusive power to manage and conduct the business of the Operating Partnership.

* * * *

2.  The last sentence of the first paragraph under the bullet points on page 151 of the Prospectus under “Operations”  is deleted in its entirety.

* * * *

3.  The first paragraph under the heading “The Participation Interest” on page 153 of the Prospectus is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

HALP Associates Limited Partnership owns a profits interest in the Operating Partnership denominated as the Participation Interest, which increases as described below and entitles it to receive distributions of the Operating Partnership based upon its percentage interest of the Operating Partnership at the time of distribution. Because the Participation Interest is a profits interest, any value of such interest would be ultimately realized only if the Operating Partnership has adequate gain or profit to allocate to the holder of the Participation Interest. Through their ownership in an affiliate of Hines or other compensation arrangements, Hines employees (including the officers and managers of our Advisor) will effectively hold up to 50% of the Participation Interest for purposes of aligning their interests with those of our sharehol ders. The Participation Interest was issued in consideration for an obligation by Hines and its affiliates to perform future services in connection with our real estate operations. We believe the Participation Interest had a nominal value at issuance. The percentage interest attributable to the Participation Interest, initially 0.0% at the first month of operations of the Operating Partnership and 2.8% as of December 31, 2009, increases on a monthly basis as described below. We anticipate that the percentage interest attributable to the Participation Interest will increase incrementally over time and, consequently, the percentage interest of holders of OP Units, including Hines REIT, will decrease proportionally. See “Risk Factors — Investment Risks — Hines REIT’s interest in the Operating Partnership will be diluted by the Participation Interest in the Operating Partnership held by HALP Associates Limited Partnership, and your investment in Hines REIT may be dilut ed if we issue additional shares” and “— Hypothetical Impact of the Participation Interest” below.

* * * *

64

4.  The disclosure under the heading “Hypothetical Impact of the Participation Interest” beginning on page 155 of the Prospectus is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

The following table shows an example of the increase of the Participation Interest, and the proportionate decrease of Hines REIT’s interest in the Operating Partnership. This table shows the actual ownership percentages in the Operating Partnership as of December 31, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009, and the estimated percentages for 2010 through 2013 assuming: (i) we raise no additional capital and otherwise issue no additional shares remaining during the remaining four years represented and (ii)  no other interests in the Operating Partnership are issued.

End of Year	Hines REIT(1)	Hines’ Cash Investment(2)	Participation Interest(3)	Total
December 31, 2004	64.29%	34.33%	1.38%	100.00%
December 31, 2005	94.24%	4.53%	1.23%	100.00%
December 31, 2006	97.38%	1.34%	1.28%	100.00%
December 31, 2007	97.60%	0.68%	1.72%	100.00%
December 31, 2008	97.31%	0.53%	2.16%	100.00%
December 31, 2009	96.76%	0.49%	2.75%	100.00%
Estimated December 31, 2010	96.03%	0.49%	3.48%	100.00%
Estimated December 31, 2011	95.29%	0.48%	4.23%	100.00%
Estimated December 31, 2012	94.54%	0.48%	4.98%	100.00%
Estimated December 31, 2013	93.79%	0.48%	5.73%	100.00%

____________

(1)	Represents Hines REIT’s interest in the Operating Partnership received as a result of offering proceeds contributed to the Operating Partnership.
(2)	Represents the $10,200,000 investment HREH made in the Operating Partnership and subsequently transferred to Hines 2005 VS I LP.
(3)	The increase in the Participation Interest will be less if Hines REIT conducts future offerings similar to this offering, as the increase in the Participation Interest will be diluted by future issuances of shares.

Q. Update to the ERISA Considerations Section

The following is hereby inserted immediately after the last paragraph under “ERISA Considerations — Annual Valuations” on page 175:

Minimum Distribution Requirements and Plan Liquidity

Potential Plan or IRA investors who intend to purchase our shares should consider the limited liquidity of an investment in our shares as it relates to the minimum distribution requirements under the Internal Revenue Code, if applicable. If the shares are held in an IRA or Plan and, before we sell our properties, mandatory distributions are required to be made to the participant or beneficiary of such IRA or Plan, pursuant to the Code, then this might require that a distribution of the shares be made in kind to such participant or beneficiary, which may not be permissible under the terms and provisions of such IRA or Plan. Even if permissible, a distribution of shares in kind generally must be included in the taxable income of the recipient for the year in which the shares are received at the then current fair market value of the shares, even though there would be no corresponding cash distribution with which to pay the income tax liability arising because of the distribution of shares.  The fair market value of any such distribution-in-kind can be only an estimated value per share because no public market for our shares exists or is likely to develop. See “— Annual Valuations” above. Further, there can be no assurance that such estimated value could actually be realized by a stockholder because estimates do not necessarily indicate the price at which our shares could be sold. Also, for distributions subject to mandatory income tax withholding under Section 3405 or other tax withholding provisions of the Code, the trustee of a Plan may have an obligation, even in situations involving in-kind distributions of shares, to liquidate a portion of the in-kind shares distributed in order to satisfy such withholding obligations, although there might be no market for such shares. There may also be similar state or local ta x withholding or other tax obligations that should be considered.

65

R.  Update to the Legal Proceedings Section

The disclosure under the heading “Legal Proceedings” on page 175 is updated to state that we were not subject to any material pending legal proceedings other than ordinary routine litigation essential to our business as of March 31, 2010.

S.  Update to the Reports to Shareholders Section

The disclosure under the heading “Reports to Shareholders beginning on page 175 of the Prospectus is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

We will make available to you on our web site at www.hinesrei.com or, at our discretion, via email, our quarterly and annual reports and other reports and documents concerning your investment.  To the extent required by law or regulation, or, in our discretion, we may also make certain of this information available to you via U.S. mail or other courier.  You may always receive a paper copy upon request.

Our tax accountants will prepare our federal tax return (and any applicable state income tax returns). Generally we will provide appropriate tax information to our stockholders within 31 days following the end of each fiscal year. Our fiscal year will be the calendar year.

T.  Update to the Experts Section

The disclosure under the heading “Experts” on page 177 of the Prospectus is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

The consolidated financial statements, and the related financial statement schedules, of Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009, the consolidated financial statements of Hines US Core Office Fund LP and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009, and the consolidated financial statements of HCB II River LLC and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and for the year then ended, incorporated in this Prospectus by reference from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent register ed public accounting firm, as stated in their reports, which are incorporated herein by reference. Such consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules have been so incorporated in reliance upon the reports of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.

U. Updates to the Incorporation by Reference Section

 The Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules allow us to incorporate by reference certain information into the Prospectus. The following replaces the bullet points in the list of filings incorporated by reference in the section entitled “Incorporation by Reference” located on page 177 of the Prospectus.

• Current report on Form 8-K, filed January 8, 2010 (includes pro forma consolidated financial statements for Hines REIT);

• our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed March 31, 2010;

• our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 13, 2010 and

• our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 28, 2010 (includes pro forma consolidated financial statements for Hines REIT).

66

V.  Updates to the Financial Statements Section

The section under “Financial Statements – Index to Financial Statements” beginning on page F-1 in the Prospectus is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. —
Consolidated Financial Statements – as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and for Each of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 2009:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	*
Consolidated Financial Statements:
Consolidated Balance Sheets	*
Consolidated Statements of Operations	*
Consolidated Statements of Equity	*
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	*
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	*
Hines U.S. Core Office Fund LP
Consolidated Financial Statements – as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and for Each of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 2009:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	*
Consolidated Financial Statements:	*
Consolidated Balance Sheets	*
Consolidated Statements of Operations	*
Consolidated Statements of Equity	*
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	*
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	*
HCB II River LLC Consolidated Financial Statements — as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and for Each of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 2009:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	*
Consolidated Financial Statements:	*
Consolidated Balance Sheets	*
Consolidated Statements of Operations	*
Consolidated Statements of Equity	*
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	*
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	*

Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. — Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Statements:
Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2009	*
Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of Operations For the Year Ended December 31, 2009	*
Unaudited Notes to Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Statements	*

__________

* See the “Incorporation by Reference” section of this Supplement.

67

W.  Appendix D - Hines History, Experience and Timeline

1.  The fourth paragraph and the immediately preceding bullet points on page D-1 of the Prospectus are deleted in their entirety and replaced with the following:

For the 10-years ended December 31, 2009, Hines sponsored 19 privately offered programs in which Hines co-invested with various institutional and other third-party investors, and one other publicly offered investment program. For these prior programs in this time period:

• Funds raised from investors: $14.7 billion

• Aggregate amount of real estate investments: $19.9 billion

• Number of properties: 234

• In the U.S., 120 properties with a cost of $12.8 billion

• Outside of the U.S., 114 properties with a cost of $6.9 billion

— 60% in Western Europe

— 3% in Canada

— 37% in emerging markets

• 107 dispositions with an aggregate cost basis of $7.4 billion and sales price of $9.1 billion

* * * *

2.  The following is inserted immediately following the last sentence on page D-5 of the Prospectus:

2009	—	Hines launches its second public program, Hines Global REIT, which commences its first public offering. Hines expands the Hines GREEN OFFICE program by offering it to its more than 3,500 tenants worldwide. Hines is honored with the Environmental Protection Agency’s 2009 ENERGY STAR Sustained Excellence Award in recognition of the firm’s continued leadership in superior energy management. Hines REIT receives NAREIT Bronze Leader in the Light Award for its continuing demonstration of superior and sustained energy practices.  As of December 31, 2009, out of 675 foreign and domestic projects, Hines has 32 projects that have been certified, 16 that have been pre-certified and 144 that are registered under LEED’s various programs. Together, these projects represent more than 102 million square feet. Hines owns and /or manages 147 ENERGY STAR labeled buildings, representing more than 75 million square feet. Additionally, 12 Hines buildings, representing more than six million square feet, have been qualified by the EPA as “Designed to Earn the ENERGY STAR” (DEES) designation for excellence in pre-occupancy design and engineering.
2010	—	Hines is honored with the Environmental Protection Agency’s 2010 ENERGY STAR Sustained Excellence Award in recognition of the firm’s continued leadership in superior energy management.

68

PROSPECTUS

Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.

Up to $3,500,000,000 in Common Shares Offered to the Public

We are a Maryland corporation sponsored by Hines Interests Limited Partnership, or Hines, a fully integrated global real estate investment and management firm that has acquired, developed, owned, operated and sold real estate for over 50 years. We invest primarily in institutional-quality office properties located throughout the United States. In addition, we have invested or may invest in other real estate investments including, but not limited to, properties outside of the United States, non-office properties, loans and ground leases. As of December 31, 2008, we had direct and indirect interests in 59 properties. These properties consist of 45 U.S. office properties, one mixed-use office and retail complex in Toronto, Ontario, one industrial property in Dallas, Texas, four industrial properties in Brazil and a portfoli o of eight grocery-anchored shopping centers located across four states in the United States. We have elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

Through our affiliated Dealer Manager, Hines Real Estate Investments, Inc., we are offering up to $3,000,000,000 in our common shares to the public on a best efforts basis. We are also offering up to $500,000,000 in our common shares to be issued pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan. We are currently offering shares to the public at a price of $10.08. Our board of directors may change this price from time to time during the offering, but not more frequently than quarterly. Shares sold under our dividend reinvestment plan are currently being sold for $9.58. Our board of directors may likewise change this price from time to time, but not more frequently than quarterly. You must initially invest at least $2,500. This offering is anticipated to terminate on or before July 1, 2010. We reserve the right to terminate this offering earlier or extend the termination to the extent we can under applicable law.

We encourage you to carefully review the complete discussion of risk factors beginning on page 9 before purchasing our common shares. This investment involves a high degree of risk. You should purchase these securities only if you can afford the complete loss of your investment. Significant risks relating to your investment in our common shares include:

• The amount of dividends we may pay, if any, is uncertain. Due to the risks involved in the ownership of real estate, there is no guarantee of any return on your investment in Hines REIT, and you may lose money.

• There is currently no public market for our common shares, and we currently do not intend to list our shares on a stock exchange or to include them for quotation on a national securities market. Therefore, it will likely be difficult for you to sell your shares, and if you are able to sell your shares, you will likely sell them at a substantial discount. The price of our common shares may be adjusted to a price less than the price you paid for your shares.

• There are restrictions and limitations on your ability to have all or any portion of your shares redeemed under our share redemption program.

• We have not identified any specific assets to acquire or investments to make with all of the proceeds of this offering. You will not have the opportunity to review the assets we will acquire or the investments we will make with the proceeds from this offering prior to your investment.

• We rely on affiliates of Hines for our day-to-day operations and the selection of real estate investments. We pay substantial fees to these affiliates for these services. These affiliates are subject to conflicts of interest as a result of this and other relationships they have with us and other programs sponsored by Hines. We also compete with affiliates of Hines for tenants and investment opportunities, and some of those affiliates will have priority with respect to many of those investment opportunities.

• We are Hines’ first publicly-offered investment program and one of Hines’ first REITs. Because Hines’ other programs and investments have been conducted through privately-held entities not subject to either the up-front commissions, fees or expenses associated with this offering or to all of the laws and regulations we are subject to, you should not assume that the prior performance of Hines will be indicative of our future results.

	Price to the Public	Selling Commission	Dealer Manager Fee	Proceeds to Us
Per Share	$              10.08	$             0.71	$            0.22	$                9.15
Maximum Offering	$3,000,000,000	$210,000,000	$66,000,000	$2,724,000,000
Dividend Reinvestment Plan	$   500,000,000	$               —	$              —	$   500,000,000

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission or other regulatory body has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW YORK HAS NOT PASSED ON OR ENDORSED THE MERITS OF THIS OFFERING. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS UNLAWFUL.

The use of projections or forecasts in this offering is prohibited. Any representations to the contrary and any predictions, written or oral, as to the amount or certainty of any present or future cash benefit or tax consequence that may flow from an investment in the common shares is not permitted.

Dated April 30, 2009

SUITABILITY STANDARDS

The common shares we are offering are suitable only as a long-term investment for persons of adequate financial means. There currently is no public market for our common shares, and we currently do not intend to list our shares on a stock exchange or on a national market. Therefore, it will likely be difficult for you to sell your shares and, if you are able to sell your shares, you will likely sell them at a substantial discount. You should not buy these shares if you need to sell them immediately, will need to sell them quickly in the future or cannot bear the loss of your entire investment.

In consideration of these factors, we have established suitability standards for all persons who may purchase shares from us in this offering. Investors with investment discretion over assets of an employee benefit plan covered under ERISA should carefully review the information entitled “ERISA Considerations.” These suitability standards require that a purchaser of shares have either:

• a minimum annual gross income of at least $70,000 and a minimum net worth (excluding the value of the purchaser’s home, home furnishings and automobiles) of at least $70,000; or

• a minimum net worth (excluding the value of the purchaser’s home, home furnishings and automobiles) of at least $250,000.

Several states have established suitability standards different from those we have established. Shares will be sold only to investors in these states who meet the special suitability standards set forth below.

Alabama, Iowa, Kentucky, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, Oregon and Pennsylvania — In addition to our suitability requirements, investors must have a liquid net worth of at least 10 times their investment in our shares.

Kansas — In addition, the Office of the Securities Commission of the State of Kansas recommends that Kansas investors not invest, in the aggregate, more than 10% of their liquid net worth in this and similar direct participation investments. Liquid net worth is defined as “that portion of net worth which consists of cash, cash equivalents and readily marketable securities.”

Tennessee — In addition to our suitability requirements, a Tennessee investor’s maximum investment in our company and our affiliates cannot exceed 10% of such Tennessee resident’s net worth.

For purposes of determining suitability of an investor, net worth in all cases shall be calculated excluding the value of an investor’s home, furnishings and automobiles.

In the case of sales to fiduciary accounts (such as an IRA, Keogh Plan, or pension or profit-sharing plan), these suitability standards must be met by the beneficiary, the fiduciary account or by the donor or grantor who directly or indirectly supplies the funds for the purchase of the shares if the donor or grantor is the fiduciary. These suitability standards are intended to help ensure that, given the long-term nature of an investment in our common shares, our investment objectives and the relative illiquidity of our shares, our shares are an appropriate investment for those of you desiring to become shareholders. Each participating broker-dealer must make every reasonable effort to determine that the purchase of common shares is a suitable and appropriate investment for each shareholder based on information provided by the sharehol der in the subscription agreement or otherwise. Each participating broker-dealer is required to maintain records of the information used to determine that an investment in common shares is suitable and appropriate for each shareholder for a period of six years.

In the case of gifts to minors, the suitability standards must be met by the custodian account or by the donor.

Subject to the restrictions imposed by state law, we will sell our common shares only to investors who initially invest at least $2,500. This initial minimum purchase requirement applies to all potential investors, including tax-exempt entities. A tax-exempt entity is generally any entity that is exempt from federal income taxation, including:

• a pension, profit-sharing, retirement or other employee benefit plan that satisfies the requirements for qualification under Section 401(a), 414(d) or 414(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”);

• a pension, profit-sharing, retirement or other employee benefit plan that meets the requirements of Section 457 of the Code;

• trusts that are otherwise exempt under Section 501(a) of the Code;

• a voluntary employees’ beneficiary association under Section 501(c)(9) of the Code; or

• an IRA that meets the requirements of Section 408 or Section 408A of the Code.

The term “plan” includes plans subject to Title I of ERISA, other employee benefit plans and IRAs subject to the prohibited transaction provisions of Section 4975 of the Code, governmental or church plans that are exempt from ERISA and Section 4975 of the Code, but that may be subject to state law requirements, or other employee benefit plans.

In order to satisfy the initial minimum purchase requirements for retirement plans, unless otherwise prohibited by state law, a husband and wife may jointly contribute funds from their separate IRAs. You should note that an investment in our common shares will not, in itself, create a retirement plan and that, in order to create a retirement plan, you must comply with all applicable provisions of the Code. Except in Maine, Minnesota, Nebraska and Washington (where any subsequent subscriptions by investors must be made in increments of at least $1,000), investors who have satisfied the initial minimum purchase requirement may make additional purchases through this or future offerings in increments of at least five shares, except for purchases made pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan which may be in increments of less than five sh ares.

You must obtain our approval prior to any transfer of your shares if, as a result of such transfer, you or the transferee will own less than the initial minimum purchase requirement, unless you are transferring all of your shares, such transfer is made on behalf of a plan, or such transfer is made by gift, inheritance, intra-family transfer or family dissolution. In addition, no transfer or assignment may be made of a fractional share without our prior approval.

You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information inconsistent with that contained in this prospectus. We are offering to sell, and seeking offers to buy, our common shares only in jurisdictions where such offers and sales are permitted.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SUITABILITY STANDARDS
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THIS OFFERING	ii
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY	1
RISK FACTORS	9
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS	36
ESTIMATED USE OF PROCEEDS	36
MANAGEMENT	39
MANAGEMENT COMPENSATION, EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENTS AND OPERATING PARTNERSHIP PARTICIPATION INTEREST	67
OUR REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS	71
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT	94
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST	95
INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN ACTIVITIES	101
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA	110
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	111
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK	132
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION	142
THE OPERATING PARTNERSHIP	150
MATERIAL TAX CONSIDERATIONS	158
ERISA CONSIDERATIONS	173
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	175
REPORTS TO SHAREHOLDERS	175
SUPPLEMENTAL SALES MATERIAL	176
LEGAL OPINIONS	176
EXPERTS	177
PRIVACY POLICY NOTICE	177
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE	177
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION	178
GLOSSARY OF TERMS	179
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	F-1
APPENDIX A — Subscription Agreement	A-1
APPENDIX B — Dividend Reinvestment Plan	B-1
APPENDIX C — Privacy Policy	C-1
APPENDIX D — Hines History, Experience and Timeline	D-1

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THIS OFFERING

The following questions and answers about this offering highlight material information regarding us and this offering that is not otherwise addressed in the “Prospectus Summary” section of this prospectus. You should read this entire prospectus, including the section entitled “Risk Factors,” before deciding to purchase any of the common shares offered by this prospectus.

Q:	What is Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., or Hines REIT?
A:	Hines REIT is a real estate investment trust, or “REIT,” that has invested and intends to continue to invest primarily in institutional-quality office properties located in the United States. In addition, we have invested and may invest in other real estate investments including, but not limited to, properties located outside of the United States, non-office properties, loans and ground leases.
	•We commenced operations in November 2004. As of March 20, 2009, we had raised approximately $2.2 billion of gross proceeds through public offerings of our common shares, including gross proceeds of approximately $215.8 million from the sale of approximately 20.8 million shares of our common stock in this offering. As of March 20, 2009, approximately $2,818.9 million in shares remained available for sale pursuant to this public offering, exclusive of approximately $465.3 million in shares available under our dividend reinvestment plan. We invest the net offering proceeds into our real estate investments, and, as of December 31, 2008, owned interests in 59 properties. These properties consist of 45 U.S. office properties, one mixed-use office and retail complex in Toronto, Ontario, o ne industrial property in Dallas, Texas, four industrial properties in Brazil and a portfolio of eight grocery-anchored shopping centers located across four states in the United States.
	•We are externally managed by our advisor, Hines Advisors Limited Partnership (our “Advisor”), which is responsible for identifying our investment opportunities and managing our day-to-day operations. Our advisor is an affiliate of our sponsor, Hines Interests Limited Partnership (“Hines”).
Q:	Who is Hines Interests Limited Partnership?
A:	Hines is a fully integrated global real estate investment and management firm and, with its predecessor, has been investing in real estate and providing acquisition, development, financing, property management, leasing and disposition services for over 50 years. Hines provides investment management services to numerous investors and partners including pension plans, domestic and foreign institutional investors, high net worth individuals and retail investors. Hines is owned and controlled by Gerald D. Hines and his son Jeffrey C. Hines. As of December 31, 2008, Hines and its affiliates had ownership interests in a real estate portfolio of 238 projects, valued at approximately $25.8 billion. Please see “Management — Hines and our Property Management and Leasing Agreements — The Hines Organ ization” for more information regarding Hines.
Q:	What competitive advantages does Hines REIT achieve through its relationship with Hines and its affiliates?
A:	We believe our relationship with Hines and its affiliates provides us the following benefits:
	•Global Presence — Our relationship with Hines and its affiliates as our sponsor, advisor and property manager allows us to have access to an organization that has extraordinary depth and breadth around the world with, as of December 31, 2008, approximately 3,750 employees (including approximately 1,300 employees outside of the United States) located in 68 cities across the United States and 16 foreign countries. This provides us a significant competitive advantage in drawing upon the experiences resulting from the vast and varied real estate cycles and strategies that varied economies and markets experience.
	•Local Market Expertise — Hines’ global platform is built from the ground up based on Hines’ philosophy that real estate is essentially a local business. Hines provides us access to a team of real estate professionals who live and work in individual major markets around the world. These regional and local teams are fully integrated to provide a full range of real estate investment and management services including sourcing investment opportunities, acquisitions, development, re-development, financing, property management, leasing, asset management, disposition, accounting and financial reporting.

ii

	•Centralized Resources — Hines’ headquarters in Houston, Texas provides the regional and local teams with, as of December 31, 2008, a group of approximately 425 personnel who specialize in areas such as capital markets, corporate finance, construction, engineering, operations, marketing, human resources, cash management, risk management, tax and internal audit. These experienced personnel provide a repository of knowledge, experience and expertise and an important control point for preserving performance standards and maintaining operating consistency for the entire organization.
	•Tenure of Personnel — Hines has one of the most experienced executive management teams in the real estate industry with, as of December 31, 2008, an average tenure within the organization of 29 years. This executive team provides stability to the organization and provides experience through numerous real estate cycles during such time frame. This impressive record of tenure is attributable to a professional culture of quality and integrity and long-term compensation plans that align personal wealth creation with real estate and investor performance and value creation.
	•Long-Term Track Record — Hines has more than 50 years of experience in creating and successfully managing capital and real estate investments for numerous third-party investors. As stated above, as of December 31, 2008, Hines and its affiliates had approximately 3,750 employees (including approximately 1,300 employees outside of the United States) located in regional and local offices in 68 cities in the United States and in 16 foreign countries around the world. Since its inception in 1957, Hines, its predecessor and their respective affiliates have acquired or developed more than 867 real estate projects representing approximately 274 million square feet.
	•Please see “Risk Factors — Potential Conflicts of Interest Risks” and “Conflicts of Interest” for a discussion of certain risks and potential disadvantages of our relationship with Hines.
Q:	What is a real estate investment trust, or REIT?
A:	In general, a REIT is an entity that:
	•pays distributions to investors of at least 90% of its annual ordinary taxable income;
	•avoids the “double taxation” treatment of income that generally results from investments in a corporation because a REIT is not generally subject to federal corporate income taxes on its taxable income to the extent it currently distributes such income and provided certain income tax requirements are satisfied relating to, among other things, the nature of its income, assets, and share ownership; and
	•combines the capital of many investors to acquire or provide financing for a diversified portfolio of real estate assets under professional management.
Q:	How do you structure the ownership and operation of your assets?
A:	We own substantially all of our assets and conduct our operations through an operating partnership called Hines REIT Properties, L.P. We are the sole general partner of Hines REIT Properties, L.P., and as described in more detail below, Hines or its affiliates own limited partner interests and a profits interest in Hines REIT Properties, L.P. To avoid confusion, in this prospectus:
	•we refer to Hines REIT Properties, L.P. as the “Operating Partnership” and partnership interests and the profits interest in the Operating Partnership, respectively, as “OP Units” and the “Participation Interest;”
	•we refer to Hines REIT and the Operating Partnership and their direct and indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries, collectively, as the “Company;” and
	•the use of “we,” “our,” “us” or similar pronouns in this prospectus refers to Hines REIT or the Company as required by the context in which such pronoun is used.
Q:	What are the risks involved in an investment in your shares?

iii

A:	An investment in our common shares is subject to significant risks. Below is a summary of certain of these risks. A more detailed list and description of the risks are contained in the “Risk Factors” and “Conflicts of Interest” sections of this prospectus. You should carefully read and consider all of these risks, and the other risks described in this prospectus, prior to investing in our common shares.
	•The amount of dividends we may pay, if any, is uncertain. Due to the risks involved in the ownership of real estate, there is no guarantee of any return on your investment in Hines REIT, and you may lose money.
	•There is currently no public market for our common shares, and we currently do not intend to list our shares on a stock exchange or include them for quotation on a national securities market. Therefore, it will likely be difficult for you to sell your shares and, if you are able to sell your shares, you will likely sell them at a substantial discount. The price of our common shares may be adjusted to a price less than the price you paid for your shares.
	•Your ability to have your shares redeemed is limited under our share redemption program, and if you are able to have your shares redeemed, it may be at a price that is less than the price you paid for the shares and the then-current market value of the shares. We may utilize all sources of cash flow, including offering proceeds, to fund redemptions which may reduce our liquidity available to fund acquisitions of real estate investments and other cash needs.
	•We have not identified any specific assets to acquire or investments to make with all of the proceeds from this offering. You will not have the opportunity to review the assets we will acquire or the investments we will make with the proceeds from this offering prior to your investment.
	•We rely on affiliates of Hines for our day-to-day operations and the selection of real estate investments. We pay substantial fees to these affiliates for these services and the fees may increase during the offering. These affiliates are subject to conflicts of interest as a result of this and other relationships they have with us and other programs sponsored by Hines.
	•We are Hines’ first publicly-offered investment program and one of Hines’ first REITs. Because Hines’ other programs and investments have been conducted through privately-held entities not subject to either the up-front commissions, fees or expenses associated with this offering or all of the laws and regulations we are subject to, you should not assume that the prior performance of Hines will be indicative of our future results.
	•We compete with affiliates of Hines for real estate investment opportunities. Some of these affiliates have preferential rights to accept or reject certain investment opportunities in advance of our right to accept or reject such opportunities. Many of the preferential rights we have to accept or reject investment opportunities are subordinate to the preferential rights of at least one affiliate of Hines.
	•We compete with other entities affiliated with Hines for tenants.
	•Hines may face a conflict of interest when determining whether we should dispose of any property we own which is managed by Hines because Hines may lose fees associated with the management of the property.
	•We are a general partner in Hines US Core Office Fund LP (the “Core Fund”); therefore, we could be responsible for all of its liabilities.
	•Our ability to redeem all or a portion of our investment in the Core Fund is subject to significant restrictions, and we may never be able to redeem all or any portion of our investment in the Core Fund.
	•In our initial quarters of operations, dividends we paid to our shareholders were partially funded with advances or borrowings from our Advisor. We may use similar advances, borrowings, deferrals or waivers of fees from our Advisor or others in the future to fund dividends to our shareholders. We cannot assure you that in the future we will be able to achieve cash flows necessary to repay such advances or borrowings and pay dividends at our historical per-share amounts, or to maintain dividends at any particular level, if at all.

iv

	•Real estate investments are subject to a high degree of risk because of general economic or local market conditions, changes in supply or demand, terrorist attacks, competing properties in an area, changes in interest rates, inflationary impact on operating expenses and changes in tax, real estate, environmental or zoning laws and regulations.
	•Our inability to acquire suitable investments, or locate suitable investments in a timely manner, will impact our ability to meet our investment objectives and may affect the amount of dividends we may pay.
	•Hines REIT’s interest in the Operating Partnership will be diluted by the Participation Interest in the Operating Partnership held by HALP Associates Limited Partnership, and your interest in Hines REIT will be diluted if we issue additional shares.
	•Hines’ ability to cause the Operating Partnership to purchase the Participation Interest and any OP Units it or its affiliates hold in connection with the termination of our Advisory Agreement may deter us from terminating our Advisory Agreement.
	•You will not have the benefit of an independent due diligence review in connection with this offering, and the fees we pay in connection with this offering were not determined on an arm’s-length basis.
	•We use debt, which will put us at risk of losing the assets securing such debt should we be unable to make debt service payments or meet other covenants or requirements in the credit agreements.
	•If we lose our REIT tax status, we will be subject to increased taxes and/or penalties, which will reduce the amount of cash we have available to pay dividends to our shareholders.
	•In order to maintain our status as a REIT, we may have to incur additional debt to pay the required dividends to our shareholders.
	•The price of our shares may be adjusted periodically to reflect changes in our net asset value as well as other factors, including changes in fees and expenses and therefore future adjustments may result in an offering price lower than the price you paid for your shares and a redemption price lower than our current redemption price.
Q:	Why should I invest in real estate investments?
A:	Allocating some portion of your investment portfolio to real estate investments may provide you with portfolio diversification, reduction of overall risk, a hedge against inflation, and attractive risk-adjusted returns. For these reasons, real estate has been embraced as a major asset class for purposes of asset allocations within investment portfolios. According to the 2008 Plan Sponsor Survey of U.S. pension investors prepared by Institutional Real Estate, Inc. and Kingsley Associates, the target allocation to real estate increased from 8.0% for 2005 to 9.6% for 2008. According to the same report, institutional investors also allocate their real estate investments across the core, value-add and opportunistic categories, and across multiple property types both domestic and international. Although institutional investors can invest dir ectly in real estate investments and on substantially different terms than individual investors, we believe that individual investors can also benefit by adding a real estate component to their investment portfolios. You and your financial advisor, investment advisor or financial planner should determine whether investing in real estate would benefit your investment portfolio.
Q:	Why should I invest in office real estate?
A:	Institutional investors have historically allocated a substantial portion of the real estate component of their investment portfolio to office real estate in an effort to obtain income, portfolio diversification and capital appreciation. We believe that investing in office real estate has the potential to provide both institutional and individual investors a combination of the following:
	•Income.  Investing in income producing office real estate, whether directly or through traded or non-traded REITs or other ownership structures, has historically provided an attractive and stable source of income to investors.

v

	•Portfolio Diversification.  Because the performance of investments in office real estate have historically had a low correlation to non-REIT stocks and a negative correlation to bonds, investing in office real estate may provide investors an opportunity to earn better risk-adjusted returns in their investment portfolios over the long term.
	•Capital Appreciation.  Office real estate investments have, over the long term, historically provided moderate capital appreciation and have served as a hedge against inflation for many investors. We believe that adding an office real estate component to an investor’s portfolio may enhance the investor’s overall portfolio return.
Q:	What are your investment objectives?
A:	Our primary investment objectives are to:

• preserve invested capital;

• invest in a diversified portfolio of office properties;

• pay regular cash dividends;

• achieve appreciation of our assets over the long term; and

• remain qualified as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.

Q:	What percentage of the gross proceeds from this offering will you invest in real estate?
A:	Assuming that we sell all the shares offered in this offering, including all shares we are offering under our dividend reinvestment plan, we expect to use approximately 90% of the gross proceeds to make real estate investments, to the extent that proceeds are not used to redeem shares pursuant to our share redemption program. We will use the balance of the gross proceeds to pay sales commissions, dealer manager fees, acquisition fees and to pay third-party acquisition expenses related to those investments. Please see “Estimated Use of Proceeds.”
Q:	Do you have conflicts of interest?
A:	Yes, Hines owns and/or manages many real estate investments and real estate ventures. Hines and its affiliates are not prohibited from engaging in future business activities that may be similar to our operations. Conflicts of interest exist among us, Hines and its affiliates, principally due to the following:
	•Hines and its affiliates are general partners and sponsors of other real estate investment programs with similar and/or non-similar investment objectives. Hines or an affiliate of Hines owes certain legal, fiduciary and financial obligations to both us and these other programs. Because of this and Hines’ other business activities, Hines and other entities affiliated with it may have conflicts of interest with us:
	•in allocating the time of Hines’ employees and other Hines resources among our operations and the operations of other entities;
	•competing with other Hines-affiliated entities for investment opportunities, some of which have priority rights over us to such opportunities, and some of which may result in higher compensation being paid to Hines, its affiliates and certain of its employees (including our directors and officers) than if such opportunities were allocated to us; and
	•competing with other properties owned or managed by Hines for tenant leasing opportunities.
	•We may buy assets from or sell assets to Hines affiliates, including properties developed by Hines, subject to the approval of a majority of our independent directors. Hines and its affiliates, including our officers and directors, may make significant profits from these transactions.
	•Hines, the Advisor and other Hines affiliates will receive substantial fees from us, which have not been negotiated at arm’s-length, which may not be conditioned upon our financial performance and which could be increased or decreased during or after this offering.

vi

	•Please see “Risk Factors — Potential Conflicts of Interest Risks” and “Conflicts of Interest” for a discussion of these and other conflicts of interest.
Q:	Do you pay fees to your sponsor?
A:	Yes, we pay fees to Hines and affiliates of Hines for services relating to this offering, our property acquisitions, our financings, the conduct of our day-to-day activities and the management of our properties, which could be increased or decreased during or after this offering. Please see “Prospectus Summary — Management Compensation, Expense Reimbursements and Operating Partnership Participation Interest” below for more information about these fees.
Q:	How would you describe your acquisition and operations process?
A:	We generally seek to follow the process used by Hines for many years, which is the following:

 

Accordingly, we expect to primarily invest in institutional quality office properties that we believe have some of the following attributes:

•Preferred Location.  We believe that location often has the single greatest impact on an asset’s long-term income-producing potential and that assets located in the preferred submarkets in metropolitan areas and situated at preferred locations within such submarkets have the potential to be long-term assets.

•Premium Buildings.  We will seek to acquire assets that generally have design and physical attributes (e.g., quality construction and materials, systems, floorplates, etc.) that are more attractive to a user than those of inferior properties.

•Quality Tenancy.  We will seek to acquire assets that typically attract tenants with better credit who require larger blocks of space because these larger tenants generally require longer term leases in order to accommodate their current and future space needs without undergoing disruptive and costly relocations.

•We believe that following an acquisition, the additional component of proactive property management and leasing is the fourth critical element necessary to achieve attractive long-term investment returns for investors. Actively anticipating and quickly responding to tenant comfort and cleaning needs are examples of areas where proactive property management may make the difference in a tenant’s occupancy experience, increasing its desire to remain a tenant and thereby providing a higher tenant retention rate, which over the long term may result in better financial performance of the property.

vii

Q:	What assets do you currently own?
A:	Our portfolio consisted of the following assets at December 31, 2008:

Direct Investments

Property	City	Leasable Square Feet	Percent Leased	Our Effective Ownership(1)
321 North Clark	Chicago, Illinois	885,664	99%	100%
Distribution Park Araucaria	Curitiba, Brazil	459,587	100%	100%
Citymark	Dallas, Texas	220,079	96%	100%
4055/4055 Corporate Drive	Dallas, Texas	643,429	100%	100%
JPMorgan Chase Tower	Dallas, Texas	1,247,782	89%	100%
345 Inverness Drive	Denver, Colorado	175,287	100%	100%
Arapahoe Business Park	Denver, Colorado	309,450	93%	100%
Raytheon/DIRECTV Buildings	El Segundo, California	550,579	100%	100%
Watergate Tower IV	Emeryville, California	344,433	100%	100%
Williams Tower	Houston, Texas	1,480,623	95%	100%
2555 Grand	Kansas City, Missouri	595,607	100%	100%
One Wilshire	Los Angeles, California	661,553	99%	100%
3 Huntington Quadrangle	Melville, New York	407,731	87%	100%
Airport Corporate Center	Miami, Florida	1,021,397	90%	100%
Minneapolis Office/Flex Portfolio	Minneapolis, Minnesota	766,039	85%	100%
3400 Data Drive	Rancho Cordova, California	149,703	100%	100%
Daytona Buildings	Redmond, Washington	251,313	100%	100%
Laguna Buildings	Redmond, Washington	464,701	100%	100%
1515 S Street	Sacramento, California	348,881	99%	100%
1900 and 2000 Alameda	San Mateo, California	253,141	95%	100%
Distribution Park Elouveira	Sao Paolo, Brazil	534,794	100%	100%
Distribution Park Vinhedo	Sao Paolo, Brazil	609,474	100%	100%
Seattle Design Center	Seattle, Washington	390,684	89%	100%
5th and Bell	Seattle, Washington	197,135	100%	100%
Atrium on Bay	Toronto, Ontario	1,077,961	98%	100%
Total for Directly-Owned Properties		14,047,027	95%
Indirect Investments
Core Fund One Atlantic Center	Atlanta, Georgia	1,100,312	82%	23.27%
The Carillon Building	Charlotte, North Carolina	470,942	97%	23.27%
Charlotte Plaza	Charlotte, North Carolina	625,026	96%	23.27%
One North Wacker	Chicago, Illinois	1,373,754	98%	23.27%
Three First National Plaza	Chicago, Illinois	1,420,118	92%	18.62%
333 West Wacker	Chicago, Illinois	845,210	94%	18.57%
One Shell Plaza	Houston, Texas	1,230,395	100%	11.64%
Two Shell Plaza	Houston, Texas	565,467	97%	11.64%
425 Lexington Avenue	New York, New York	700,034	100%	11.67%
499 Park Avenue	New York, New York	288,722	100%(2)	11.67%
600 Lexington Avenue	New York, New York	285,605	93%	11.67%
Renaissance Square	Phoenix, Arizona	965,508	89%	23.27%
Riverfront Plaza	Richmond, Virginia	951,421	100%	23.27%
Johnson Ranch Corporate Centre	Roseville, California	179,990	64%	18.57%
Roseville Corporate Center	Roseville, California	111,418	91%	18.57%
Summit at Douglas Ridge	Roseville, California	185,128	78%	18.57%
Olympus Corporate Centre	Roseville, California	191,494	40%	18.57%
Douglas Corporate Center	Roseville, California	214,606	78%	18.57%
Wells Fargo Center	Sacramento, California	502,365	98%	18.57%
525 B Street	San Diego, California	446,737	81%	23.27%
The KPMG Building	San Francisco, California	379,328	100%	23.27%
101 Second Street	San Francisco, California	388,370	91%(3)	23.27%

viii

Property	City	Leasable Square Feet	Percent Leased	Our Effective Ownership(1)
720 Olive Way	Seattle, Washington	300,710	94%	18.57%
1200 19th Street	Washington, D.C.	328,154(4)	28%	11.67%
Warner Center	Woodland Hills, California	808,274	90%	18.57%
Total for Core Fund Properties		14,859,088	91%(5)
Grocery-Anchored Portfolio
Bellaire Boulevard Center	Bellaire, Texas	35,081	100%	70%
Champions Village	Houston, Texas	404,820	92%	70%
King’s Crossing	Kingwood, Texas	126,397	97%	70%
Oak Park Village	San Antonio, Texas	64,287	100%	70%
Cherokee Plaza	Atlanta, Georgia	99,751	100%	70%
University Palms Shopping Center	Oviedo, Florida	99,172	99%	70%
Commons at Dexter Lakes	Memphis, Tennessee	228,496	92%	70%
Mendenhall Commons	Memphis, Tennessee	79,871	97%	70%
Total for Grocery-Anchored Portfolio(6)		1,137,875	95%
Other
Distribution Park Rio(7)	Rio de Janeiro, Brazil	693,115	99%	50%
Total for All Properties		30,737,105	93%(8)

____________

(1)	This percentage shows the effective ownership of the Operating Partnership in the properties listed. On December 31, 2008, Hines REIT owned a 97.3% interest in the Operating Partnership as its sole general partner. Affiliates of Hines owned the remaining 2.7% interest in the Operating Partnership. In addition, we owned an approximate 28.7% non-managing general partner interest in the Core Fund as of December 31, 2008. The Core Fund does not own 100% of its properties; its ownership interest in its properties ranges from 40.6% to 81.1%.
(2)	On December 16, 2008, Dreier LLP, a law firm tenant that leased 101,604 square feet of space at 499 Park Avenue, filed for bankruptcy. On February 18, 2009, the U.S. Bankruptcy court rejected the lease effective January 31, 2009, thus terminating the lease. This tenant has stopped paying rent and, as of March 31, 2009, has completely vacated this space. However, the leased percentage included in this table treats this space as leased as of December 31, 2008. Assuming that the Dreier space was treated as vacant, the percentage leased at this property would have been approximately 65% as of December 31, 2008.
(3)	On October 28, 2008, Thelen LLP, a law firm tenant that leased 145,158 square feet of space at 101 Second Street, dissolved its business. Thelen LLP ceased paying rent after October 31, 2008 and has vacated the space. In connection with its wind- up and dissolution on January 10, 2009, Thelen agreed to a new short-term lease. As of March 31, 2009, the tenant has completely vacated this space. However, the leasing percentage included in this table treats this space as leased as of December 31, 2008. Assuming that the Thelen space was treated as vacant, the percentage leased at this property would have been approximately 54% as of December 31, 2008.
(4)	This square footage amount includes three floors which are being added to the building and are currently under construction. The construction is expected to be completed in April 2009.
(5)	Assuming the changes described in notes 4 and 5 above, the Core Fund’s properties would have been approximately 90% leased as of December 31, 2008.
(6)	After December 31, 2008, we purchased four additional grocery-anchored shopping centers consisting of 379,664 square feet of net rentable area which were 95% leased as of the date of acquisition.
(7)	We own a 50% indirect interest in Distribution Park Rio, an industrial property located in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, through a joint venture with Hines Calpers Brazil (“HCB”), an affiliate of Hines. We formed the joint venture in June 2007 with an initial investment of $28.9 million.
(8)	This amount represents the percentage leased assuming we own a 100% interest in each of these properties. The percentage leased based on our effective ownership interest in each property is 95%.

ix

Q:	Why do you invest in the Core Fund?
A:	The Core Fund has preferential rights to invest in high quality Class A office properties. We make investments in the Core Fund to provide Hines REIT the opportunity to invest with a number of institutional investors in the Core Fund into such a portfolio. Our investment in the Core Fund allows us to own an indirect interest in a diversified portfolio of Class A office buildings located in markets such as New York City, Washington D.C., Atlanta, Houston, Chicago, Richmond, Sacramento, San Francisco, San Diego, Charlotte, Phoenix and Seattle. Since the amount of capital required to acquire these types of buildings is substantial, we believe it would take us a significant amount of time, if ever, to be in a position to prudently acquire these types of buildings on our own. We believe that owning an indirect interest i n the buildings owned by the Core Fund, together with the properties we acquire directly, will result in a more diversified and stable portfolio of real estate investments for our shareholders.
Q:	What investment or ownership interests does Hines or any of its affiliates have in the Company?
A:	Hines or its affiliates have the following investments and ownership interests in the Company:
	•an investment of $10,200,000 in limited partnership interests of the Operating Partnership by an affiliate of Hines, Hines 2005 VS I LP; and
	•an investment of $10,000 for common shares of Hines REIT by Hines REIT Investor L.P., an affiliate of Hines;
	•an interest in the Operating Partnership, which is adjusted monthly in a manner intended to approximate the economic equivalent of the reinvestment by Hines of what would otherwise be cash payments of acquisition fees and asset management fees. As of December 31, 2008, this participation interest in the Operating Partnership represented approximately $43.6 million in reinvestment by Hines. Please see “The Operating Partnership — The Participation Interest” for a description of this interest.
Q:	What kind of offering is this?
A:	We are offering a maximum of $3,000,000,000 in our common shares to the public on a “best efforts” basis through Hines Real Estate Investments, Inc. (formerly known as Hines Real Estate Securities, Inc.), an affiliate of Hines (the “Dealer Manager”), currently at a price of $10.08 per share. We are also offering up to $500,000,000 in our common shares to be issued pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan currently at a price of $9.58 per share to those shareholders who elect to participate in such plan as described in this prospectus. Our board of directors may change the offering price of our shares, as well as the price for shares issued under our dividend reinvestment plan.
Q:	Who can buy shares?
A:	You can generally buy shares pursuant to this prospectus if you have either:
	•a minimum annual gross income of at least $70,000 and a minimum net worth (not including home, furnishings and personal automobiles) of at least $70,000; or
	•a minimum net worth (not including home, furnishings and personal automobiles) of at least $250,000.
	However, these minimum levels may vary from state to state, so you should carefully read the suitability requirements explained in the “Suitability Standards” section of this prospectus.
Q:	Is there any minimum required investment?
A:	Yes. You must initially invest at least $2,500. Thereafter, subject to restrictions imposed by state law, you may purchase additional shares in whole or fractional share increments subject to a minimum for each additional purchase of $50. You should carefully read the minimum investment requirements explained in the “Suitability Standards” section of this prospectus.

x

Q:	How do I subscribe for shares?
A:	If you choose to purchase common shares in this offering, you will need to contact your registered broker-dealer or investment advisor and fill out a subscription agreement substantially in the form (or similar to the form) attached to this prospectus as Appendix A for a certain investment amount and pay for the shares at the time you subscribe.
Q:	If I buy shares, will I receive dividends and, if so, how often?
A:	With the authorization of our board of directors, we declare distributions to our shareholders as of daily record dates and aggregate and pay such distributions quarterly. From the date we commenced business operations through June 30, 2006, we declared distributions equal to $0.00164384 per share, per day. From July 1, 2006 through April 30, 2008, we declared distributions equal to $0.00170959 per share, per day. From May 1, 2008 through May 31, 2009, we declared distributions of $0.00175233 per share, per day. Please see “Description of Capital Stock — Distribution Objectives.”
Q:	Are dividends I receive taxable?
A:	Yes and no. Generally, dividends that you receive will be considered ordinary income to the extent they are from current or accumulated earnings and profits for tax purposes. Because we anticipate that our dividends will exceed our taxable income, we expect a portion of your dividends will be considered return of capital for tax purposes. These amounts will not be subject to tax immediately but will instead reduce the tax basis of your investment. This in effect defers a portion of your tax until your shares are sold or the Company is liquidated, at which time you will be taxed at capital gains rates on any gains. However, because each investor’s tax implications are different, we suggest you consult with your tax advisor. You and your tax advisor should also review the section of this prospectus entitled “Material Tax Considerations.”
Q:	Do you have a dividend reinvestment plan?
A:	Yes, our dividend reinvestment plan allows shareholders to reinvest dividends for additional shares at a price currently set at $9.58 per share. The terms of this plan may, however, be amended or terminated by our board in its discretion upon at least 10 days’ notice.
Q:	How can I have my shares redeemed?
A:	We provide a share redemption program under which we may redeem shares, subject to a monthly limitation of 1/12th of 10% of the shares outstanding as of the prior calendar year-end; provided, however, that our board of directors retains the right to redeem additional shares if, in its sole discretion, it determines that it is in our best interests to do so based on available cash flow and other factors. In no event during any calendar year will the number of shares we redeem exceed, as of the date of any such redemption, 10% of the shares outstanding as of the same date in the prior calendar year. Please see “Risk Factors — Investment Risks — Your ability to have your shares redeemed is limited under our share redemption plan, and if you are able to have your shares redeemed, it may be at a price that is les s than the price you paid for the shares and the then-current market value of the shares. We may utilize all sources of cash flow, including offering proceeds, to fund redemptions which may reduce our liquidity available to fund acquisitions of real estate investments and other cash needs.”
Q:	What is your current share redemption price?
A:	Shares are currently redeemed at a price of $9.15 per share. Our board of directors may change this redemption price from time to time and may otherwise amend, suspend or terminate our share redemption program at any time upon at least 30 days’ notice.
Q:	What potential exit strategies may occur?
A:	We may consider and execute exit strategies at both the asset level and portfolio level. These exit strategies may consist of any of the following:
	•disposition of individual properties;

xi

•sale of a portion or all of our assets;

•a merger or other business combination; or

•a listing of our shares on a national exchange or for quotation on a national securities market.

Our board of directors will approve any such exit strategy only if it is deemed to be in the best interests of our shareholders.

Q:	Why have you not set a finite date for a liquidity event?
A:	Due to the uncertainties of market conditions in the future, we believe setting finite dates for possible, but uncertain, liquidity events may result in actions that are not necessarily in the best interests or within the expectations of our shareholders. Therefore, we believe it is more appropriate to allow us and our board of directors the flexibility to consider multiple options and not be obligated to execute a particular liquidity event by a set date.
Q:	How long will this offering last?
A:	This offering is anticipated to terminate on or before July 1, 2010. We reserve the right to terminate or extend this offering at any time.
Q:	Will I be notified of how my investment is doing?
A:	Yes, you will receive or have access to periodic updates on the performance of your investment, including:
	•four quarterly dividend statements;
	•periodic prospectus supplements;
	•an annual report;
	•an annual Internal Revenue Service Form 1099-DIV, if required; and
	•three quarterly financial reports.
	We will provide this information to you via one or more of the following methods:
	•electronic delivery;
	•posting on our web site, located at www.HinesREIT.com, along with any required notice;
	•to the extent requested, U.S. mail or other courier; or
	•to the extent requested, facsimile.
Q:	When will I get my detailed tax information?
A:	We expect that we will send you your Form 1099-DIV tax information by January 31 of each year.
Q:	Who is your transfer agent?
A:	Our transfer agent is DST Systems Inc.
Q:	Who can help answer my questions?
A:	If you have more questions about this offering or if you would like additional copies of this prospectus, you should contact your participating broker-dealer or investment advisor:

Hines Real Estate Investments, Inc.

2800 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 4700

Houston, Texas 77056-6118

Telephone: (888) 446-3773

xii

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

This prospectus summary highlights material information regarding our business and this offering that is not otherwise addressed in the “Questions and Answers about this Offering” section of this prospectus. You should read and consider this entire prospectus, including the section entitled “Risk Factors,” before deciding to purchase any common shares offered by this prospectus. We include a glossary of some of the terms used in this prospectus beginning on page 179.

Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.

Hines REIT, a Maryland corporation, was formed on August 5, 2003 primarily for the purpose of engaging in the business of investing in and owning interests in real estate. We have invested and intend to continue to invest primarily in institutional-quality office properties located throughout the United States, and, as of December 31, 2008, owned interests in 59 properties. These properties consist of 45 U.S. office properties, one mixed-use office and retail complex in Toronto, Ontario, one industrial property in Dallas, Texas, four industrial properties in Brazil and a portfolio of eight grocery-anchored shopping centers located across four states in the United States. We have invested or may invest in other real estate investments, including additional properties located outside of the United States, non-office proper ties, loans and ground leases. Please see “Investment Objectives and Policies with Respect to Certain Activities — Acquisition and Investment Policies” for a more detailed description of our acquisition and investment policies and procedures.

We have qualified and intend to continue to operate as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Among other requirements, REITs are required to distribute at least 90% of their annual ordinary taxable income.

Our office is located at 2800 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 5000, Houston, Texas 77056-6118. Our telephone number is 1-888-220-6121. Our web site is www.HinesREIT.com.

Our Board

We operate under the direction of our board of directors, which has a fiduciary duty to act in the best interest of our shareholders. Our board of directors approves each investment recommended by our Advisor and oversees our operations. We currently have seven directors, four of whom are independent directors. Our directors are elected annually by our shareholders. Our four independent directors serve on the conflicts committee of our board of directors. This committee is required to review and approve all matters the board believes may involve a conflict of interest between us and Hines or its affiliates.

Our Advisor

Our Advisor, who manages our day-to-day operations, is an affiliate of Hines. The Advisor is responsible for identifying potential investments, acquiring real estate investments, structuring and negotiating financings, asset and portfolio management, executing asset dispositions, financial reporting, public reporting and other regulatory compliance, investor relations and other administrative functions. The Advisor may contract with other Hines entities to perform these functions.

Our Property Manager

Hines is responsible for the day-to-day operation and management of most of our real estate properties. Services provided or managed by Hines may include tenant relations, tenant marketing and leasing, lease negotiation and administration, tenant construction, property maintenance and repairs, property refurbishment and renovation, energy management, security, risk management, parking management, financial budgeting and accounting.

1

Our Structure

The following chart illustrates our general structure and our management relationship with Hines and its affiliates as of December 31, 2008:

2

Management Compensation, Expense Reimbursements and Operating Partnership Participation Interest

Our Advisor and its affiliates will receive substantial fees in connection with this offering and our operations, which could be increased or decreased during or after this offering. The following table sets forth the type and, to the extent possible, estimates of all fees, compensation, income, expense reimbursements, interests and other payments by the Company payable directly to Hines and its affiliates in connection with this offering and our operations. For purposes of this table, except as noted, we have assumed no volume discounts or waived commissions as discussed in the “Plan of Distribution.”

Type and Recipient	Description and Method of Computation	Estimated Maximum (Based on $3,500,000,000 in Shares)(1)
	Organizational and Offering Activities(2)
Selling Commissions — the Dealer Manager	Up to 7.0% of gross offering proceeds, excluding proceeds from our dividend reinvestment plan; all selling commissions will be reallowed to participating broker-dealers. If you are party to an agreement with a licensed broker dealer, investment advisor or bank trust department pursuant to which you pay a fee based on assets under management such as a “wrap fee”, “commission replacement fee”, or similar fee, we will waive selling commissions and dealer manager fees and sell shares to you at an aggregate 9.2% discount.	$210,000,000(3)
Dealer Manager Fee — the Dealer Manager	Up to 2.2% of gross offering proceeds, excluding proceeds from our dividend reinvestment plan, all or a portion of which may be reallowed to selected participating broker-dealers. If you are party to an agreement with a licensed broker dealer, investment advisor or bank trust department pursuant to which you pay a fee based on assets under management such as a “wrap fee”, “commission replacement fee”, or similar fee, we will waive dealer manager fees and the selling commissions and sell shares to you at an aggregate 9.2% discount.	$66,000,000(4)
No Reimbursement of Organization and Offering Expenses	All organization and offering expenses will be paid by an affiliate of Hines.(5)	Not applicable.
	Investment Activities(6)
Acquisition Fee — the Advisor	With respect to each real estate investment made after the commencement of this offering up to an aggregate of $2,000,000,000 in real estate investments made after the commencement of this offering, 2.5% of (i) the purchase price of real estate investments acquired directly by us, including any debt attributable to such investments, or (ii) when we make an investment indirectly through another entity, such investment’s pro rata share of the gross asset value of real estate investments held by that entity. With respect to each real estate investment made thereafter, the fee will be equal to 0.50% of the amounts set forth in (i) and (ii), as applicable.	$55,771,000(7)

3

Type and Recipient Description and Method of Computation Estimated Maximum (Based on $3,500,000,000 in Shares)(1)

Participation Interest in the Operating Partnership — HALP Associates Limited Partnership	A profits interest in the Operating Partnership which increases over time in a manner intended to approximate (i) an additional 0.50% cash acquisition fee as calculated above and (ii) the automatic reinvestment of such cash back into the Operating Partnership.	Not determinable at this time(8)
Debt Financing Fee — the Advisor	1.0% of the amount obtained under any property loan or made available to us under any other debt financing. In no event will the debt financing fee be paid more than once in respect of the same debt.	Not determinable at this time.(9)
	Operational Activities
Asset Management Fee — the Advisor	0.0625% per month of the net equity capital we have invested in real estate investments at the end of each month.	Not determinable at this time(10)
Participation Interest in the Operating Partnership — HALP Associates Limited Partnership	A profits interest in the Operating Partnership which increases over time in a manner intended to approximate (i) a 0.0625% per month cash asset management fee as calculated above and (ii) the automatic reinvestment of such cash back into the Operating Partnership.(8)	Not determinable at this time(10)
Expense Reimbursements in connection with our administration — the Advisor	Reimbursement of actual expenses incurred on an ongoing basis.(11)	Not determinable at this time
Property Management Fee — Hines	The lesser of (i) 2.5% of annual gross revenues received from the property, or (ii) the amount of management fees recoverable from tenants under their leases, subject to a minimum of 1.0% of annual gross revenues in the case of single-tenant properties.(12)	Not determinable at this time
Leasing Fee — Hines	1.5% of gross revenues payable over the term of each executed lease, including any amendment, renewal, extension, expansion or similar event if Hines is our primary leasing agent.(12)	Not determinable at this time
Tenant Construction Management Fees — Hines	Amount payable by the tenant under its lease or, if payable by the landlord, direct costs incurred by Hines if the related services are provided by off-site employees.(13)	Not determinable at this time
Re-development Construction Management Fees — Hines	2.5% of total project costs relating to the re-development, plus direct costs incurred by Hines in connection with providing the related services.	Not determinable at this time
Expense Reimbursements — Hines	Reimbursement of actual expenses incurred in connection with the management and operation of our properties.(14)	Not determinable at this time

4

Type and Recipient Description and Method of Computation Estimated Maximum (Based on $3,500,000,000 in Shares)(1)

	Disposition and Liquidation
Disposition Fee	Unless approved by our independent directors, no disposition fee will be paid to the Advisor or its affiliates in connection with disposition of our investments.	Not applicable
Incentive Fee	No incentive fee will be paid to the Advisor or its affiliates in connection with the sale of assets, liquidation or listing of our shares.	Not applicable

____________

(1)	Assumes we sell the maximum of $3,000,000,000 in shares in our primary offering and issue $500,000,000 in shares under our dividend reinvestment plan pursuant to this offering.
(2)	The total compensation related to our organizational and offering activities, which includes selling commissions and the dealer manager fee (but does not include our organization and offering expenses, because those expenses are being paid by an affiliate and not by us), will not exceed 15% of the proceeds raised in this offering. See footnote 5 below.
(3)	Commissions may be reduced for volume or other discounts or waived as further described in the “Plan of Distribution” section of this prospectus; however, for purposes of calculating the estimated maximum selling commissions in this table, we have not assumed any such discounts or waivers. Further, the Dealer Manager will not receive selling commissions for shares issued pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan.
(4)	The dealer manager fees may be reduced for volume or other discounts or waived as further described in the “Plan of Distribution” section of this prospectus; however, for purposes of calculating the estimated maximum dealer manager fees in this table, we have not assumed any such discounts or waivers. Further, the Dealer Manager will not receive the dealer manager fee for shares issued pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan.
(5)	The Advisor will pay for all organization and offering expenses, other than selling commissions and the dealer manager fee, whether incurred by us directly or through the Advisor, the Dealer Manager and/or their affiliates, which expenses are expected to consist of, among other expenses, actual legal, accounting, printing, filing fees, transfer agent costs and other offering-related expenses. Organization and offering expenses may also include, but are not limited to: (i) salaries, discretionary bonuses, benefits and other expenses of employees of our Dealer Manager while participating in the offering and marketing of our shares and in connection with their wholesaling activities; (ii) costs and expenses related to participating in broker-dealer sponsored events or hosting meetings with participating broker-dealers; (iii) 0;costs and expenses of conducting educational conferences and seminars; (iv) travel, lodging, entertainment and other expenses related to the offering and marketing of our shares; (v) advertising and marketing expenses, including the cost of promotional items; (vi) costs and expenses of conducting internal sales training and seminars and (vii) legal expenses of the Dealer Manager. We will have no liability for such expenses.
(6)	The acquisition fees and acquisition expenses incurred in connection with the purchase of real estate investments will not exceed an amount equal to 6.0% of the contract purchase price of the investment. However, a majority of our directors (including a majority of our independent directors) not otherwise interested in the transaction may approve such fees and expenses in excess of this limit if they determine the transaction to be commercially competitive, fair and reasonable to us. Tenant construction management fees and re-development construction management fees will be included in the definition of acquisition fees or acquisition expenses for this purpose to the extent that they are paid in connection with the acquisition, development or redevelopment of a property. If any such fees are paid in connection with a portion of a lease d property at the request of a tenant or in conjunction with a new lease or lease renewal, such fees will be treated as ongoing operating costs of the property, similar to leasing commissions.

5

(7)	For purposes of calculating the estimated maximum acquisition fees in this table, we have assumed that we will not use debt when making real estate investments. In the event we raise the maximum $3,500,000,000 pursuant to this offering and all of our real estate investments are 50% leveraged at the time we acquire them, the total acquisition fees payable will be $71,811,000. Some of these fees may be payable out of the proceeds of such borrowings.
(8)	Because the Participation Interest is a profits interest, any value of such interest would be ultimately realized only if the Operating Partnership has adequate gain or profit to allocate to the holder of the Participation Interest. Please see “The Operating Partnership — The Participation Interest” for more details about this interest. The component of the increase in the Participation Interest attributable to investment activities will be included in the definition of acquisition fees and will therefore be included in the 6.0% limitation calculation described above in footnote 6. In addition, the component of the increase in the Participation Interest attributable to operational activities will be included in the definition of operating expenses and will therefore be included in the 2%/25% operating expense lim itation described below in footnote 11.
(9)	Actual amounts are dependent upon the amount of any debt incurred in connection with our acquisitions and otherwise and therefore cannot be determined at the present time. In the event we raise the maximum $3,500,000,000 pursuant to this offering and all of our real estate investments are 50% leveraged, the total debt financing fees payable will be $31,811,000.
(10)	In connection with both the asset management fee and the corresponding increase in the Participation Interest, the percentage itself on an annual basis would equal 0.75%, or 1.5% on a combined basis. However, because each of the cash fee and the Participation Interest increase is calculated monthly, and the net equity capital we have invested in real estate investments may change on a monthly basis, we cannot accurately determine or calculate the amount or the value (in either dollars or percentage) of either of these items on an annual basis.
(11)	The Advisor will reimburse us for any amounts by which operating expenses exceed the greater of (i) 2.0% of our invested assets or (ii) 25% of our net income, unless our independent directors determine that such excess was justified. To the extent operating expenses exceed these limitations, they may not be deferred and paid in subsequent periods. Operating expenses include generally all expenses paid or incurred by us as determined by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or U.S. GAAP, except certain expenses identified in our charter. The expenses identified by our charter as excluded from operating expenses include: (i) expenses of raising capital such as organizational and offering expenses, legal, audit, accounting, tax services, costs related to compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 200 2, underwriting, brokerage, listing, registration and other fees, printing and such other expenses and taxes incurred in connection with the issuance, distribution, transfer, registration and stock exchange listing of our shares; (ii) interest payments, taxes and non-cash expenditures such as depreciation, amortization and bad debt reserves; (iii) amounts paid as partnership distributions of the Operating Partnership; and (iv) all fees and expenses associated or paid in connection with the acquisition, disposition and ownership of assets (such as real estate commissions, acquisition fees and expenses, costs of foreclosure, insurance premiums, legal services, maintenance, repair or improvement of property, etc.). Please see “Management — The Advisor and the Advisory Agreement — Reimbursements by the Advisor” for a detailed description of these expenses.
(12)	Property management fees and leasing fees for international acquisitions may differ from our typical property management fees and leasing fees due to differences in international markets, but in all events the fees shall be paid in compliance with our charter and shall be approved by our independent directors.
(13)	These fees relate to construction management services for improvements and build-out to tenant space.
(14)	Included in reimbursement of actual expenses incurred by Hines are the costs of personnel and overhead expenses related to such personnel who are located in Hines central and regional offices, to the extent to which such costs and expenses relate to or support Hines’ performance of its duties. Periodically, an affiliate of Hines may be retained to provide ancillary services for a property which are not covered by a property management agreement and are generally provided by third parties. These services are provided at market terms and are generally not material to the management of the property.

6

In addition, we pay our independent directors certain fees, reimburse independent directors for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at board or committee meetings and award independent directors common shares under our Employee and Director Incentive Share Plan. Please see “Management — Compensation of Directors.” We will not pay any fees or compensation to the Core Fund, its general partner or advisor. All fees and compensation paid to the Core Fund, its general partner or its advisor will be paid or borne solely by limited partners in the Core Fund.

For a more detailed description of all of the fees, compensation, income, expense reimbursements, interests, distributions and other payments payable to Hines and its affiliates, please see the “Management Compensation, Expense Reimbursements and Operating Partnership Participation Interest” section of this prospectus. Subject to limitations in our charter, the fees, compensation, income, expense reimbursements, interests and other payments payable to Hines and its affiliates may increase or decrease during this offering or future offerings from those described above if such revision is approved by our independent directors.

Description of Capital Stock

Distribution Objectives

In order to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we must distribute at least 90% of our taxable income (excluding capital gains) to our shareholders. We intend to continue to make regular quarterly distributions to holders of our common shares at least at the level required to maintain our REIT status unless our results of operations, our general financial condition, general economic conditions or other factors inhibit us from doing so. Distributions are authorized at the discretion of our board of directors, which is directed, in substantial part, by its obligation to cause us to comply with the REIT requirements of the Internal Revenue Code.

With the authorization of our board of directors, we declare distributions to our shareholders as of daily record dates and aggregate and pay such distributions quarterly. From the date we commenced business operations through June 30, 2006, our board of directors authorized and we declared distributions equal to $0.00164384 per share, per day. From July 1, 2006 through April 30, 2008, our board of directors authorized and we declared distributions equal to $0.00170959 per share, per day. From May 1, 2008 through May 31, 2009, we declared distributions of $0.00175233 per share, per day. Please see “Description of Capital Stock — Distribution Objectives.”

Dividend Reinvestment Plan

You may participate in our dividend reinvestment plan, pursuant to which you may have your dividends reinvested in additional whole or fractional common shares, currently at a price of $9.58 per share. If you participate in the dividend reinvestment plan and are subject to federal income taxation, you may incur a tax liability for dividends allocated to you even though you have elected not to receive the dividends in cash but rather to have the dividends withheld and reinvested in common shares. As a result, you may have a tax liability without receiving cash dividends to pay such liability and would have to rely solely on sources of funds other than our dividends in order to pay your taxes. A majority of our board of directors may change the per-share purchase price or otherwise amend or terminate the dividend reinvestment plan for an y reason at any time upon 10 days’ prior notice to plan participants. Please see the “Description of Capital Stock — Dividend Reinvestment Plan” section of this prospectus for further explanation of our dividend reinvestment plan, a complete copy of which is included as Appendix B to this prospectus.

Share Redemption Program

An investment in our common shares should be made as a long-term investment which is consistent with our acquisition and investment policies and strategies. We offer a share redemption program that may allow shareholders to have their shares redeemed subject to certain limitations and restrictions discussed more fully in the “Description of Capital Stock — Share Redemption Program” portion of this prospectus. No fees will be paid to Hines in connection with any redemptions. Our board of directors may terminate, suspend or amend the share redemption program upon 30 days’ written notice without shareholder approval.

7

After you have held your shares for a minimum of one year, our share redemption program will provide you with the ability to have all or a portion of your shares redeemed, subject to certain restrictions and limitations. To the extent our board of directors determines that we have sufficient available cash flow for redemptions, we intend to redeem shares on a monthly basis; however, our board of directors may determine from time to time to adjust the timing of redemptions upon 30 days’ notice. Monthly share redemptions will be limited to 1/12th of 10% of the shares outstanding as of the prior calendar year-end; provided, however, that our board of directors retains the right to redeem additional shares if, in its sole discretion, it determines that it is in our best interests to do so based on available cash flow and ot her factors. In no event during any calendar year will the number of shares we redeem exceed, as of the date of any such redemption, 10% of the shares outstanding as of the same date in the prior calendar year. We may, but are not required to, use available cash flow not otherwise dedicated to a particular use to meet these redemption needs, including cash proceeds generated from the dividend reinvestment plan, securities offerings (including this offering), operating cash flow not intended for dividends, borrowings and capital transactions such as asset sales or refinancings.

Shares will be redeemed at a price of $9.15 per share. Our board of directors may adjust the per share redemption price from time to time upon 30 days’ notice based on our then-current estimated net asset value at the time of the adjustment and such other factors as it deems appropriate, including the then-current offering price of our shares (if any), our then-current dividend reinvestment plan price and general market conditions. You may withdraw your request to have your shares redeemed in accordance with the terms of the program. In addition, we may waive the one-year holding period requirement and the annual limitation in connection with redemption requests made after the death or disability of a shareholder. As a result of these restrictions, you should not assume that you will be able to have all or a portion of your shares redeemed. Please see “Description of Capital Stock — Share Redemption Program” for further explanation of our share redemption program.

8

RISK FACTORS

You should carefully read and consider the risks described below, together with all other information in this prospectus, before you decide to buy our common shares. We encourage you to keep these risks in mind when you read this prospectus and evaluate an investment in us. If certain of the following risks actually occur, our results of operations and ability to pay dividends would likely suffer materially or could be eliminated entirely. As a result, the value of our common shares may decline, and you could lose all or part of the money you paid to buy our common shares.

Investment Risks

There is currently no public market for our common shares, and we do not intend to list the shares on a stock exchange. Therefore, it will likely be difficult for you to sell your shares and, if you are able to sell your shares, you will likely sell them at a substantial discount. The price of our common shares may be adjusted to a price less than the price you paid for your shares.

There is no public market for our common shares, and we do not expect one to develop. We currently have no plans to list our shares on a national securities exchange or over-the-counter market, or to include our shares for quotation on any national securities market. Additionally, our charter contains restrictions on the ownership and transfer of our shares, and these restrictions may inhibit your ability to sell your shares. We have a share redemption program, but it is limited in terms of the amount of shares that may be redeemed annually. Our board of directors may also limit, suspend or terminate our share redemption program upon 30 days’ written notice. It may be difficult for you to sell your shares promptly or at all. If you are able to sell your shares, you may only be able to sell them at a substantial discount from the price you paid. This may be the result, in part, of the fact that the amount of funds available for investment are reduced by funds used to pay selling commissions, the dealer manager fee and acquisition fees in connection with our public offerings. Unless our aggregate investments increase in value to compensate for these up-front fees and expenses, which may not occur, it is unlikely that you will be able to sell your shares, whether pursuant to our share redemption program or otherwise, without incurring a substantial loss. You may also experience substantial losses if we dispose of our assets or in connection with a liquidation event. We cannot assure you that your shares will ever appreciate in value to equal the price you paid for your shares. Thus, prospective shareholders should consider our common shares as illiquid and a long-term investment, and you must be prepared to hold your shares for an indefinite length of time. Further, the price of our shares may be adjusted periodically to reflect c hanges in our net asset value as well as other factors, including changes in fees and expenses and therefore future adjustments may result in an offering price lower than the price you paid for your shares and a redemption price lower than our current redemption price. We reduced the price of our shares effective January 26, 2009 and our redemption price effective March 1, 2009. Please see “Description of Capital Stock — Restrictions on Transfer” herein for a more complete discussion on certain restrictions regarding your ability to transfer your shares.

Your ability to have your shares redeemed is limited under our share redemption program, and if you are able to have your shares redeemed, it may be at a price that is less than the price you paid for the shares and the then-current market value of the shares. We may utilize all sources of cash flow, including offering proceeds, to fund redemptions which may reduce our liquidity available to fund acquisitions of real estate investments and other cash needs.

Even though our share redemption program may provide you with a limited opportunity to have your shares redeemed after you have held them for a period of one year, you should understand that our share redemption program contains significant restrictions and limitations. In addition, irrespective of the amount of time you have held your securities, only the following shares are eligible for redemption: (i) shares purchased directly from us, (ii) shares received through a non-cash transaction, not in the secondary market and (iii) shares purchased from another shareholder prior to January 11, 2009. We expect to redeem shares to the extent our board of directors determines we have sufficient available cash to do so subject to the annual and monthly limitations on the number of shares we can redeem set forth in our shar e redemption program. Please see “Description of Capital Stock — Share Redemption Program.” During 2009, we have experienced an increase in share redemption requests. From January 1, 2009 to April 1, 2009, we have redeemed approximately $84.7 million in shares as compared to $58.7 million, $10.6 million and $2.3 million during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Moreover, the number of share redemption requests we received during the months of February and March exceeded the monthly limit of shares we may redeem pursuant to the share redemption plan by 574,594 shares ($5,257,537) and 638,658 shares ($5,843,717), respectively. While our board of directors elected to waive this monthly limitation, we cannot assure you that our board will elect to or will otherwise be able to waive this limitation in the future. If at any time some but not all tendered shares are redeemed, shares will be redeemed on a pro rata basis.

9

We may, but are not required to, utilize all sources of cash flow not otherwise dedicated to a particular use to meet the redemption needs, including proceeds from our dividend reinvestment plan, securities offerings (including this offering), operating cash flow not intended for distributions, borrowings and capital transactions such as asset sales or financings. For example, in 2009 we have used proceeds from our primary offering to fund redemption requests. Cash used to fund redemptions reduces our liquidity available to fund acquisitions of real estate investments and other cash needs.

Our board of directors reserves the right to amend, suspend or terminate the share redemption program at any time in its discretion upon 30 days’ written notice. Shares are currently redeemed at a price of $9.15 per share. However, our board of directors may change the redemption price from time to time upon 30 days’ written notice based on our then-current estimated net asset value at the time of the adjustment and such other factors as it deems appropriate, including the then-current offering price of our shares (if any), our then-current dividend reinvestment plan price and general market conditions. The methodology used in determining the redemption price is subject to a number of limitations and to a number of assumptions and estimates which may not be accurate or complete. The redemption price may not be ind icative of the price our shareholders would receive if our shares were actively traded, if we were liquidated or if they otherwise sold their shares. Therefore, in making a decision to purchase common shares, you should not assume that you will be able to sell all or any portion of your shares back to us pursuant to our share redemption program or at a price that reflects the then-current market value of the shares.

Due to the risks involved in the ownership of real estate, there is no guarantee of any return on your investment in Hines REIT, and you may lose some or all of your investment.

By owning our shares, shareholders will be subjected to significant risks associated with owning and operating real estate. The performance of your investment in Hines REIT will be subject to such risks, including:

• changes in the general economic climate;

• changes in local conditions such as an oversupply of space or reduction in demand for real estate;

• changes in interest rates and the availability of financing;

• changes in property level operating expenses due to inflation or otherwise; and

• changes in laws and governmental regulations, including those governing real estate usage, zoning and taxes.

Please see the section of this prospectus entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” for additional information on interest rate risks. If our assets decrease in value, the value of your investment will likewise decrease, and you could lose some or all of your investment.

You will not have the benefit of an independent due diligence review in connection with this offering and, if a conflict of interest arises between us and Hines, we may incur additional fees and expenses.

Because the Advisor and our Dealer Manager are affiliates of Hines, you will not have the benefit of an independent due diligence review and investigation of the type normally performed by an unaffiliated, independent underwriter in connection with a securities offering. In addition, Greenberg Traurig, LLP has acted as counsel to us, the Advisor and our Dealer Manager in connection with this offering and, therefore, investors will not have the benefit of a due diligence review and investigation that might otherwise be performed by independent counsel which increases the risk of your investment. If any situation arises in which our interests are in conflict with those of our Dealer Manager or its affiliates, and we are required to retain additional counsel, we will incur additional fees and expenses.

10

We have invested a significant percentage of our total current investments, and we may invest a portion of the net proceeds of this offering, in the Core Fund. Because of our current and possible future Core Fund investments, it is likely that Hines affiliates will retain significant control over a significant percentage of our investments even if our independent directors remove our Advisor.

While a majority of our independent directors may remove our Advisor upon 60 days’ written notice, our independent directors cannot unilaterally remove the managing general partner of the Core Fund, which is also an affiliate of Hines. We have substantial investments in the Core Fund and may invest a portion of the proceeds from this offering in the Core Fund. Because of our current Core Fund investments and because our ability to remove the managing general partner of the Core Fund is limited, it is likely that an affiliate of Hines will maintain a substantial degree of control over a significant percentage of our investments despite the removal of our Advisor by our independent directors. Any additional investments by us in the Core Fund will contribute to this risk. Please see “Our Real Estate Investments ̵ 2; Description of the Non-Managing General Partner Interest and Certain Provisions of the Core Fund Partnership Agreement — Summary of Certain Provisions of the Core Fund Partnership Agreement” for a description of the procedures for removing the managing general partner of the Core Fund. In addition, our ability to redeem any investment we hold in the Core Fund is limited. Please see “— Business and Real Estate Risks — Our ability to redeem all or a portion of our investment in the Core Fund is subject to significant restrictions” for more information regarding our ability to redeem any investments in the Core Fund.

The fees we pay in connection with this offering were not determined on an arm’s-length basis and therefore may not be on the same terms we could achieve from a third party.

The compensation paid to our Advisor, Dealer Manager, Property Manager and other affiliates of Hines for services they provide us was not determined on an arm’s-length basis. All service agreements, contracts or arrangements between or among Hines and its affiliates, including the Advisor and us, were not negotiated at arm’s-length. Such agreements include the Advisory Agreement, the Dealer Manager Agreement and the Property Management and Leasing Agreement. We cannot assure you that a third party unaffiliated with Hines would not be able and willing to provide such services to us at a lower price.

We will pay substantial compensation to Hines, the Advisor and their affiliates, which may be increased or decreased during this offering or future offerings by our independent directors.

Subject to limitations in our charter, the fees, compensation, income, expense reimbursements, interests and other payments payable to Hines, the Advisor and their affiliates may increase or decrease during this offering or future offerings from those described in “Management Compensation, Expense Reimbursements and Operating Partnership,” if such increase or decrease is approved by our independent directors.

We will pay the Advisor a fee on any line of credit made available to us, whether or not we utilize all or any portion of such line of credit.

We will pay the Advisor a debt financing fee equal to 1.0% of the amount obtained under any property loan or made available under any other debt financing obtained by us. With respect to a line of credit obtained by us, we will pay the debt financing fee on the aggregate amount available to us under the line of credit, irrespective of whether any amounts are drawn down under such line of credit. Because of this, the Advisor will have a conflict in determining when to obtain a line of credit and the amount to be made available thereunder.

11

You will not have the opportunity to evaluate the investments we will make with the proceeds of this offering before you purchase our shares, and we may not have the opportunity to evaluate or approve investments made by entities in which we invest, such as the Core Fund.

Our board of directors and the Advisor have broad discretion when identifying, evaluating and making investments with the proceeds of this offering, and we have not definitively identified investments that we will make with all of the proceeds of this offering. We are therefore generally unable to provide you with information to evaluate our potential investments with the proceeds of this offering prior to your purchase of our shares. Regarding our investments other than those we currently hold or have committed to make, you will not have the opportunity to evaluate the transaction terms or other financial or operational data concerning such investments. Further, we may not have the opportunity to evaluate and/or approve properties acquired or other investments made by entities in which we invest, such as the Core Fund. You will likewi se have no opportunity to evaluate future transactions completed and properties acquired by the Core Fund. You must rely on our board of directors and the Advisor to evaluate our investment opportunities, and we are subject to the risk that our board and/or the Advisor may not be able to achieve our objectives, will make unwise decisions or will make decisions that are not in our best interest because of conflicts of interest. We may be subject to similar risks in relation to investments made by entities in which we acquire an interest but do not control, such as the Core Fund. Please see the risks discussed under “— Potential Conflicts of Interest Risks” below.

This offering is being conducted on a “best efforts” basis, and the risk that we will not be able to accomplish our business objectives will increase if only a small number of shares are purchased in this offering.

Our common shares are being offered on a “best efforts” basis and no individual, firm or corporation has agreed to purchase any of our common shares in this offering. Additionally, no minimum amount must be raised prior to the release of proceeds to the Company and no proceeds will be placed in escrow. Funds paid by an investor will be immediately available for use by the Company upon our acceptance of a subscription agreement. We are subject to the risk that fewer than all of the shares we are offering will be sold. If we are only able to sell a limited number of shares, we will make fewer investments, resulting in less diversification in terms of the number and types of investments we own and the geographic regions in which our investments are located.

If we are only able to sell a small number of shares in this offering, our fixed operating expenses such as general and administrative expenses would be higher (as a percentage of gross income) than if we are able to sell a greater number of shares.

We incur certain fixed operating expenses in connection with our operations, such as costs incurred to secure insurance for our directors and officers, regardless of our size. To the extent we sell fewer than the maximum number of shares offered by this prospectus, these expenses will represent a greater percentage of our gross income and, correspondingly, will have a greater proportionate adverse impact on our ability to pay dividends to you.

If we sell less than the maximum offering amount for this offering, the acquisition fees payable to the Advisor (as a percentage of net proceeds) will be higher than if we are able to sell a greater number of shares.

The acquisition fees payable to the Advisor and its affiliates decrease after our first $2,000,000,000 in real estate investments made after the commencement of this offering. If we have less than $2,000,000,000 of real estate investments made after the commencement of this offering, the acquisition fees payable to the Advisor will only be payable at the higher rate and the corresponding aggregate percentage of net proceeds will be higher than the percentage presented in the “Estimated Use of Proceeds” table.

12

The offering price of our common shares may not be indicative of the price at which our shares would trade if they were actively traded.

Our board of directors determined the selling price of our common shares based upon a number of factors, and there are no established criteria for valuing issued or outstanding shares. Please see “Plan of Distribution.” Therefore, our offering price may not be indicative of either the price at which our shares would trade if they were listed on an exchange or actively traded by brokers or of the proceeds that a shareholder would receive if we were liquidated or dissolved.

The price you pay for our common shares in this offering may depend upon the broker-dealer or financial advisor executing the transaction.

Discounts and fee waivers will be available through certain financial advisers and broker-dealers under the circumstances described in “Plan of Distribution,” and you should ask your financial advisor and/or broker-dealer about the ability to receive such discounts or fee waivers. Accordingly, the aggregate selling commissions and dealer manager fees presented in the “Estimated Use of Proceeds” table will vary depending on the total amount of subscriptions to which discounts and fee waivers apply. If you purchase our shares at a discount, you will receive a higher percentage return on your investment than investors who do not purchase shares at such discount. With respect to shares purchased pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan, you cannot receive a discount greater than 5% of the then-current price of our shares, regardless of whether you have received a greater discount on shares purchased in this or prior offerings due to the volume of your purchases or otherwise. Accordingly, if you qualify for the discounts and fee waivers described in “Plan of Distribution,” you may be able to receive a lower price on subsequent purchases in this offering than you would receive if you participate in our dividend reinvestment plan and have your dividends reinvested at the price offered thereunder.

Hines REIT’s interest in the Operating Partnership will be diluted by the Participation Interest in the Operating Partnership held by HALP Associates Limited Partnership, and your interest in Hines REIT may be diluted if we issue additional shares.

Hines REIT owned a 97.3% general partner interest in the Operating Partnership as of December 31, 2008. HALP Associates Limited Partnership owns a Participation Interest in the Operating Partnership, which was issued as consideration for an obligation by Hines and its affiliates to perform future services in connection with our real estate operations. This interest in the Operating Partnership, as well as the number of shares into which it may be converted, increases on a monthly basis. As of December 31, 2008, the percentage interest in the Operating Partnership attributable to the Participation Interest was 2.2%, and such interest was convertible into 4.5 million common shares, subject to the fulfillment of certain conditions. The Participation Interest will increase to the extent leverage is used because the use of le verage will allow us to acquire more assets. Please see “The Operating Partnership — The Participation Interest” for a summary of this interest. Each increase in this interest will dilute your indirect investment in the Operating Partnership and, accordingly, reduce the amount of distributions that would otherwise be payable to you in the future. Please see “The Operating Partnership — Hypothetical Impact of the Participation Interest.”

Additionally, shareholders do not have preemptive rights to acquire any shares issued by us in the future. Therefore, investors purchasing our common shares in this offering may experience dilution of their equity investment if we:

• sell shares in this offering or sell additional shares in the future, including those issued pursuant to the dividend reinvestment plan and shares issued to our officers and directors or employees of the Advisor and its affiliates under our Employee and Director Incentive Share Plan;

• sell securities that are convertible into shares, such as interests in the Operating Partnership;

• issue shares in a private offering;

• issue common shares to the Advisor or affiliates in exchange for any cash fees they may agree to defer;

13

• issue common shares upon the exercise of options granted to our independent directors, or employees of the Company or the Advisor; or

• issue shares to sellers of properties acquired by us in connection with an exchange of partnership units from the Operating Partnership.

The redemption of interests in the Operating Partnership held by Hines and its affiliates (including the Participation Interest) as required in our Advisory Agreement may discourage a takeover attempt if our Advisory Agreement would be terminated in connection therewith.

In the event of a merger in which we are not the surviving entity, and pursuant to which our Advisory Agreement is terminated under certain circumstances, Hines and its affiliates may require the Operating Partnership to purchase all or a portion of the Participation Interest and any interest in the Operating Partnership, or OP Units, that they hold at any time thereafter for cash, or our shares, as determined by the seller. Please see “Management — The Advisor and the Advisory Agreement — Removal of the Advisor.” The Participation Interest increases on a monthly basis and as the percentage interest in the Operating Partnership attributable to this interest increases, these rights may deter transactions that could result in a merger in which we are not the survivor. This deterrence may limit the o pportunity for shareholders to receive a premium for their common shares that might otherwise exist if an investor attempted to acquire us through a merger.

The Participation Interest would increase at a faster rate with frequent dispositions of properties followed by acquisitions using proceeds from such dispositions.

A component of the Participation Interest is intended to approximate an increased interest in the Operating Partnership based on a percentage of the cost of our investments or acquisitions. Because the interest in the Operating Partnership represented by the Participation Interest increases with each acquisition we make, if we frequently sell assets and reinvest the proceeds of such dispositions, the Participation Interest would increase at a faster rate than it would if we acquired assets and held them for an extended period. Likewise, if we frequently sell assets and reinvest the proceeds of such dispositions, our Advisor will earn additional cash acquisition fees.

Hines’ ability to cause the Operating Partnership to purchase the Participation Interest and any OP Units it and its affiliates hold in connection with the termination of the Advisory Agreement may deter us from terminating the Advisory Agreement.

Under our Advisory Agreement, if the Company is not advised by an entity affiliated with Hines, Hines or its affiliates may cause the Operating Partnership to purchase some or all of the Participation Interest or OP Units then held by such entities. Please see “Management — The Advisor and the Advisory Agreement — Removal of the Advisor.” The purchase price will be based on the net asset value of the Operating Partnership and payable in cash, or our shares, as determined by the seller. If the termination of the Advisory Agreement would result in the Company not being advised by an affiliate of Hines, and if the amount necessary to purchase Hines’ interest in the Operating Partnership is substantial, these rights could discourage or deter us from terminating the Advisory Agreement under circu mstances in which we would otherwise do so.

We may issue preferred shares or separate classes or series of common shares, which issuance could adversely affect the holders of the common shares issued pursuant to this offering.

We may issue, without shareholder approval, preferred shares or a class or series of common shares with rights that could adversely affect the holders of the common shares issued in this offering. Upon the affirmative vote of a majority of our directors (including, in the case of preferred shares, a majority of our independent directors), our charter authorizes our board of directors (without any further action by our shareholders) to issue preferred shares or common shares in one or more class or series, and to fix the voting rights (subject to certain limitations), liquidation preferences, dividend rates, conversion rights, redemption rights and terms, including sinking fund provisions, and certain other rights and preferences with respect to such class or series of shares. In addition, a majority of our independent directors must ap prove the issuance of preferred shares. If we ever create and issue preferred shares with a dividend preference over common shares, payment of any dividend preferences of outstanding preferred shares would reduce the amount of funds available for the payment of dividends on the common shares. Further, holders of preferred shares are normally entitled to receive a preference payment in the event we liquidate, dissolve or wind up before any payment is made to the common shareholders, likely reducing the amount common shareholders would otherwise receive upon such an occurrence. We could also designate and issue shares in a class or series of common shares with similar rights. In addition, under certain circumstances, the issuance of preferred shares or a separate class or series of common shares may render more difficult or tend to discourage:

14

• a merger, offer or proxy contest;

• the assumption of control by a holder of a large block of our securities; and/or

• the removal of incumbent management.

We are not registered as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, and therefore we will not be subject to the requirements imposed on an investment company by such Act. Similarly, the Core Fund is not registered as an investment company.

We are not, and the Core Fund is not, registered as an “investment company” under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Investment Company Act”). Investment companies subject to this act are required to comply with a variety of substantive requirements such as requirements relating to:

• limitations on the capital structure of the entity;

• restrictions on certain investments;

• prohibitions on transactions with affiliated entities; and

• public reporting disclosures, record keeping, voting procedures, proxy disclosure and similar corporate governance rules and regulations.

Many of these requirements are intended to provide benefits or protections to security holders of investment companies. Because we do not expect to be subject to these requirements, you will not be entitled to these benefits or protections.

In order to operate in a manner to avoid being required to register as an investment company we may be unable to sell assets we would otherwise want to sell or we may need to sell assets we would otherwise wish to retain. In addition, we may also have to forgo opportunities to acquire interests in companies or entities that we would otherwise want to acquire. The operations of the Core Fund may likewise be limited in order for the Core Fund to avoid being required to register as an investment company.

If Hines REIT, the Operating Partnership or the Core Fund is required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act, the additional expenses and operational limitations associated with such registration may reduce your investment return or impair our ability to conduct our business as planned.

We do not expect to operate as an “investment company” under the Investment Company Act. However, the analysis relating to whether a company qualifies as an investment company can involve technical and complex rules and regulations. If we own assets that qualify as “investment securities” as such term is defined under this Act and the value of such assets exceeds 40% of the value of our total assets, we could be deemed to be an investment company. It is possible that many of our interests in real estate may be held through other entities, and some or all of these interests in other entities could be deemed to be investment securities.

If we held investment securities and the value of these securities exceeded 40% of the value of our total assets we may be required to register as an investment company. Investment companies are subject to a variety of substantial requirements that could significantly impact our operations. Please see “— We are not registered as an investment company under the Investment Company Act and therefore we will not be subject to the requirements imposed on an investment company by such Act. Similarly, the Core Fund is not registered as an investment company.” The costs and expenses we would incur to register and operate as an investment company, as well as the limitations placed on our operations, could have a material adverse impact on our operations and your investment return.

15

We have received an opinion from our counsel, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, dated November 25, 2008 that is based on certain assumptions and representations and taking into consideration our current assets and the percentage which could be deemed “investment securities,” as of the date of the opinion, we were not an investment company.

If we were required to register as an investment company, but failed to do so, we would be prohibited from engaging in our business, criminal and civil actions could be brought against us, some of our contracts might be unenforceable unless a court were to direct enforcement, and a court could appoint a receiver to take control of us and liquidate our business.

Our investment in the Core Fund is subject to the risks described in this risk factor as the Core Fund will need to operate in a manner to avoid qualifying as an investment company as well. If the Core Fund is required to register as an investment company, the extra costs and expenses and limitations on operations resulting from such as described above could adversely impact the Core Fund’s operations, which would indirectly reduce your investment return, and that registration also could adversely affect our status as an investment company.

The ownership limit in our charter may discourage a takeover attempt.

Our charter provides that no holder of shares, other than Hines, affiliates of Hines or any other person to whom our board of directors grants an exemption, may directly or indirectly own more than 9.9% in value of the aggregate of our outstanding shares or more than 9.9% of the number or value, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of any class or series of our outstanding securities. This ownership limit may deter tender offers for our common shares, which offers may be attractive to our shareholders, and thus may limit the opportunity for shareholders to receive a premium for their common shares that might otherwise exist if an investor attempted to assemble a block of common shares in excess of 9.9% in value of the aggregate of our outstanding shares or more than 9.9% of the number or value, whichever is more res trictive, of the outstanding common shares or otherwise to effect a change of control in us. Please see the “Description of Capital Stock — Restrictions on Transfer” section of this prospectus for additional information regarding the restrictions on transfer of our common shares.

We will not be afforded the protection of the Maryland General Corporation Law relating to business combinations.

Provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law prohibit business combinations, unless prior approval of the board of directors is obtained before the person seeking the combination became an interested shareholder, with:

• any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power of our outstanding shares (an “interested shareholder”);

• any of our affiliates who, at any time within the two year period prior to the date in question, was the beneficial owner of 10% or more of the voting power of our outstanding shares (also an “interested shareholder”); or

• an affiliate of an interested shareholder.

These prohibitions are intended to prevent a change of control by interested shareholders who do not have the support of our board of directors. Because our charter contains limitations on ownership of 9.9% or more of our common shares by a shareholder other than Hines or an affiliate of Hines, we opted out of the business combinations statute in our charter. Therefore, we will not be afforded the protections of this statute and, accordingly, there is no guarantee that the ownership limitations in our charter will provide the same measure of protection as the business combinations statute and prevent an undesired change of control by an interested shareholder.

16

Business and Real Estate Risks

Any indirect investment we make will be consistent with the investment objectives and policies described in this prospectus and will, therefore, be subject to similar business and real estate risks. The Core Fund, which has investment objectives and policies similar to ours, is subject to many of the same business and real estate risks as we are.

For example, the Core Fund:

• may not have sufficient available funds to make distributions;

• expects to acquire additional properties in the future which, if unsuccessful, could affect our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders;

• is subject to risks as a result of joint ownership of real estate with Hines and other Hines programs or third parties;

• intends to use borrowings to partially fund acquisitions, which may result in foreclosures and unexpected debt-service requirements and indirectly negatively affect our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders;

• is also dependent upon Hines and its key employees for its success;

• also operates in a competitive business with competitors who have significant financial resources and operational flexibility;

• may not have funding or capital resources for future tenant improvements;

• depends on its tenants for its revenue and relies on certain significant tenants;

• is subject to risks associated with terrorism, uninsured losses and high insurance costs;

• will be affected by general economic and regulatory factors it cannot control or predict;

• will make illiquid investments and be subject to general economic and regulatory factors, including environmental laws, which it cannot control or predict; and

• will be subject to property taxes and operating expenses that may increase.

To the extent the operations and ability of the Core Fund, or any other entity through which we indirectly invest in real estate, to make distributions is adversely affected by any of these risks, our operations and ability to pay distributions to you will be adversely affected.

We are different in some respects from other programs sponsored by Hines, and therefore the past performance of such programs may not be indicative of our future results.

We are Hines’ first publicly-offered investment program and one of Hines’ first REITs. Hines’ previous programs and investments were conducted through privately-held entities not subject to either the up-front commissions, fees or expenses associated with this offering or all of the laws and regulations that govern us, including reporting requirements under the federal securities laws and tax and other regulations applicable to REITs. A significant portion of Hines’ other programs and investments also involve development projects. Although we are not prohibited from participating in development projects, we currently do not expect to participate in significant development activities. We are also one of the first programs sponsored by Hines with investment objectives permitting the making and purchasing of loans and participations in loans, and Hines does not have significant experience making such investments. The past performance of other programs sponsored by Hines may not be indicative of our future results, and we may not be able to successfully operate our business and implement our investment strategy, which may be different in a number of respects from the operations previously conducted by Hines. You should not rely on the past performance of other programs or investments sponsored by Hines to predict or as an indication of our future performance.

17

Geographic concentration of our portfolio may make us particularly susceptible to adverse economic developments in the real estate markets of those areas.

In the event that we have a concentration of real estate investments in a particular geographic area, our operating results and ability to make distributions are likely to be impacted by economic changes affecting the real estate markets in that area. Your investment will be subject to greater risk to the extent that we lack a geographically diversified portfolio of real estate investments. For example, based on our pro-rata share of the market value of the properties in which we owned interests as of December 31, 2008, approximately 12% of our portfolio consists of properties located in Los Angeles, 12% of our portfolio consists of properties located in Chicago and 10% of our portfolio consists of properties located in Houston. Consequently, our financial condition and ability to make distributions could be materially and adverse ly affected by any significant adverse developments in those markets.

Industry concentration of our tenants may make us particularly susceptible to adverse economic developments in these industries.

In the event we have a concentration of tenants in a particular industry, our operating results and ability to make distributions may be adversely affected by adverse developments in these industries and we will be subject to a greater risk to the extent that our tenants are not diversified by industry.

Delays in purchasing properties with proceeds received from this offering may result in a lower rate of return to investors.

As of the date of this prospectus we have not identified specific properties we will purchase with all of the proceeds of this offering. Because we are conducting this offering on a “best efforts” basis over several months, our ability to locate and commit to purchase specific properties will be partially dependent on our ability to raise sufficient funds for such acquisitions, which is difficult to predict. We may be substantially delayed in making investments due to delays in the sale of our common shares, delays in negotiating or obtaining the necessary purchase documentation, delays in locating suitable investments, our use of offering proceeds to fund shareholder redemption requests or other factors. We expect to invest proceeds we receive from this offering in short-term, highly-liquid investments until we use such fu nds in our operations. We expect that the income we earn on these temporary investments will not be substantial. Therefore, delays in investing proceeds we raise from this offering could impact our ability to generate cash flow for distributions.

If we purchase assets at a time when the commercial real estate market is experiencing substantial influxes of capital investment and competition for properties, the real estate we purchase may not appreciate or may decrease in value.

In the past several years, the commercial real estate market has experienced a substantial influx of capital from investors. This substantial flow of capital, combined with significant competition for real estate, may have resulted in inflated purchase prices for such assets. We and the Core Fund have recently purchased assets, and to the extent either of us purchases real estate in the future in such an environment, we are subject to the risks that the value of our assets may not appreciate or may decrease significantly below the amount we paid for such assets if the real estate market ceases to attract the same level of capital investment in the future as it has recently attracted, or if the number of companies seeking to acquire such assets decreases. If any of these circumstances occur or the values of our investments are otherwise negatively affected, the value of your investment may be lower.

In our initial quarters of operations, dividends we paid to our shareholders were partially funded with advances or borrowings from our Advisor. We may use similar advances, borrowings, deferrals or waivers of fees from our Advisor or affiliates, or other sources in the future to fund dividends to our shareholders. We cannot assure you that in the future we will be able to achieve cash flows necessary to repay such advances or borrowings and pay dividends at our historical per-share amounts, or to maintain dividends at any particular level, if at all.

18

We cannot assure you that we will be able to continue paying dividends to our shareholders at our historical per-share amounts, or that the dividends we pay will not decrease or be eliminated in the future. In our initial quarters of operations, the distributions we received from the Core Fund and our net cash flow provided by or used in operating activities (before the payments of cash acquisition fees to our Advisor, which we fund with net offering proceeds) were insufficient to fund our distributions to shareholders and minority interests. As a result, our Advisor advanced funds to us to enable us to partially fund our dividends, and our Advisor deferred, and in some cases forgave, the reimbursement of such advances. We have not received any advances from our advisor after June 30, 2006, and other than with respect to amounts p reviously forgiven, as of December 31, 2006, we have reimbursed our Advisor for these advances. Our Advisor is under no obligation to advance funds to us in the future or to defer or waive fees in order to support our dividends.

If our Advisor or its affiliates were to refuse to advance funds to cover our expenses or to defer or waive fees in the future, our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders could be adversely affected, and we may be unable to pay dividends to our shareholders, or such dividends could decrease significantly. In addition, our Advisor, banks or other financing sources may make loans or advances to us in order to allow us to pay future dividends to our shareholders. The ultimate repayment of this liability could adversely impact our ability to pay dividends in future periods, decrease the amount of cash we have available for operations and new investments and potentially adversely impact the value of your investment. In addition, our Advisor or affiliates could choose to receive shares of our common stock or interests in the operating partnership in lieu of cash fees to which they are entitled, and the issuance of such securities may dilute your interest in Hines REIT.

We may need to incur borrowings that would otherwise not be incurred to meet REIT minimum distribution requirements.

In order to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we are required to distribute to our shareholders at least 90% of our annual ordinary taxable income. In addition, we will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the amount, if any, by which certain dividends paid (or deemed paid) by us with respect to any calendar year are less than the sum of (i) 85% of our ordinary income for that year, (ii) 95% of our capital gain net income for that year and (iii) 100% of our undistributed taxable income from prior years.

We expect our income, if any, to consist almost solely of our share of the Operating Partnership’s income, and the cash available for the payment of dividends by us to our shareholders will consist of our share of cash distributions made by the Operating Partnership. As the general partner of the Operating Partnership, we will determine the amount of any distributions made by the Operating Partnership. However, we must consider a number of factors in making such distributions, including:

• the amount of the cash available for distribution;

• the impact of such distribution on other partners of the Operating Partnership;

• the Operating Partnership’s financial condition;

• the Operating Partnership’s capital expenditure requirements and reserves therefor; and

• the annual distribution requirements contained in the Code necessary to qualify and maintain our qualification as a REIT.

Differences in timing between the actual receipt of income and actual payment of deductible expenses and the inclusion of such income and deduction of such expenses when determining our taxable income, as well as the effect of nondeductible capital expenditures, the creation of reserves, the use of cash to purchase shares under our share redemption program or required debt amortization payments, could result in our having taxable income that exceeds cash available for distribution.

19

In view of the foregoing, we may be unable to meet the REIT minimum distribution requirements and/or avoid the 4% excise tax described above. In certain cases, we may decide to borrow funds in order to meet the REIT minimum distribution and/or avoid the 4% excise tax even if our management believes that the then prevailing market conditions generally are not favorable for such borrowings or that such borrowings would not be advisable in the absence of such tax considerations.

We expect to acquire additional properties in the future, which could subject us to risks associated with owning and managing new properties.

We expect to acquire interests in additional properties in the future with the proceeds of this offering. We also expect that the Core Fund will acquire properties in the future. The acquisition of properties, or interests in properties by us or the Core Fund, will subject us to risks associated with owning and/or managing new properties. Specific examples of risks that could relate to acquisitions include:

• risks that investments will fail to perform in accordance with our expectations because of conditions or liabilities we did not know about at the time of acquisition;

• risks that projections or estimates we made with respect to the performance of the investments, the costs of operating or improving the properties or the effect of the economy or capital markets on the investments will prove inaccurate; and

• general investment risks associated with any real estate investment.

We are subject to risks as the result of joint ownership of real estate with other Hines programs and third parties.

We have invested in properties and assets jointly with other Hines programs and with other third parties. We may also purchase or develop properties in joint ventures or partnerships, co-tenancies or other co-ownership arrangements with Hines affiliates, the sellers of the properties, developers or similar persons. Joint ownership of properties, under certain circumstances, may involve risks not otherwise present with other methods of owing real estate. Examples of these risks include:

• the possibility that our partners or co-investors might become insolvent or bankrupt;

• that such partners or co-investors might have economic or other business interests or goals that are inconsistent with our business interests or goals, including inconsistent goals relating to the sale of properties held in the joint venture or the timing of the termination and liquidation of the venture;

• the possibility that we may incur liabilities as the result of actions taken by our partner or co-investor; or

• that such partners or co-investors may be in controlling positions and/or may be in a position to take actions contrary to our instructions or requests or contrary to our policies or objectives, including our policy with respect to qualifying and maintaining our qualification as a REIT.

Actions by a co-venturer, co-tenant or partner may result in subjecting the assets of the joint venture to unexpected liabilities. Under joint venture arrangements, neither co-venturer may have the power to control the venture, and under certain circumstances, an impasse could result and this impasse could have an adverse impact on the operations and profitability of the joint venture.

If we have a right of first refusal or buy/sell right to buy out a co-venturer or partner, we may be unable to finance such a buy-out if it becomes exercisable or we are required to purchase such interest at a time when it would not otherwise be in our best interest to do so. If our interest is subject to a buy/sell right, we may not have sufficient cash, available borrowing capacity or other capital resources to allow us to elect to purchase an interest of a co-venturer subject to the buy/sell right, in which case we may be forced to sell our interest as the result of the exercise of such right when we would otherwise prefer to keep our interest. Finally, we may not be able to sell our interest in a joint venture if we desire to exit the venture for any reason or if our interest is likewise subject to a right of first refusal of our c o-venturer or partner, our ability to sell such interest may be adversely impacted by such right. Joint ownership arrangements with Hines affiliates may also entail conflicts of interest. Please see “Conflicts of Interest — Joint Venture Conflicts of Interest” for a description of these risks.

20

Our ability to redeem all or a portion of our investment in the Core Fund is subject to significant restrictions.

The Core Fund will only redeem up to 10% of its outstanding interests during any calendar year and the managing general partner of the Core Fund may limit redemptions as a result of certain tax and other regulatory considerations. We may not be able to exit the Core Fund or liquidate all or a portion of our interest in the Core Fund. Please see the risk factor captioned “— If the Core Fund is forced to sell its assets to satisfy mandatory redemption requirements, our investments in the Core Fund may be materially adversely affected” below, as well as “Our Real Estate Investments — Description of the Non-Managing General Partner Interest and Certain Provisions of the Core Fund Partnership Agreement — Summary of Certain Provisions of the Core Fund Partnership Agreement.”

If the Core Fund is forced to sell its assets in order to satisfy mandatory redemption requirements, our investment in the Core Fund may be materially adversely affected.

The Core Fund co-owns several buildings together with certain independent pension plans and funds (the “Institutional Co-Investors”) that are advised by Promark Investment Advisors Inc. (the “Institutional Co-Investor Advisor”). Each entity formed to hold these buildings is required to redeem the interests held by the Institutional Co-Investors in such entity at dates ranging from August 19, 2012 to October 2, 2018. Please see “Our Real Estate Investments — Certain Rights of the Institutional Co-Investors and the Institutional Co-Investor Advisor — Redemption Right” for a summary of these rights. Additionally, the Institutional Co-Investor Advisor is entitled to co-investment rights for real estate assets in which the Core Fund invests. For each asset in which Ins titutional Co-Investors acquire interests pursuant to the Institutional Co-Investor Advisor’s co-investment rights, the Core Fund will establish a three-year period ending no later than the twelfth anniversary of the date the asset is acquired during which the entity through which those Institutional Co-Investors co-invest in such asset will redeem such Institutional Co-Investors’ interests in such entity, unless the Institutional Co-Investors elect to extend such period. The Institutional Co-Investor Advisor also has certain buy/sell rights in entities in which the Institutional Co-Investors have co-invested with the Core Fund.

In addition, certain limited partnerships established by Ideenkapital Financial Engineering AG and affiliated entities under the laws of Germany own interests in US Core Properties, a subsidiary of the Core Fund through which it owns a majority of its investments. Each such entity (“IK Fund”) has the right to require US Core Properties to redeem all or a portion of its interest in US Core Properties as of certain dates ranging from December 31, 2014 through December 31, 2017. The Core Fund is obligated to provide US Core Properties with sufficient funds to fulfill US Core Properties’ obligations in respect of the IK Fund redemption rights described above, to the extent sufficient funds are not otherwise available to US Core Properties. Please see “Our Real Estate Investments — Certain Rights of IK US Portfolio Invest GmbH & Co. KG” for additional information.

We cannot assure you that the Core Fund will have capital available on favorable terms or at all to fund the redemption of such interests. If the Core Fund is not able to raise additional capital to meet such mandatory redemption requirements, the Core Fund may be required to sell assets that it would otherwise elect to retain or sell assets or otherwise raise capital on less than favorable terms or at a time when it would not otherwise do so. If the Core Fund is forced to sell any of its assets under such circumstances, the disposition of such assets could materially adversely impact the Core Fund’s operations and ability to make distributions to us and, consequently, our investment in the Core Fund.

21

If we invest in a limited partnership as a general partner, we could be responsible for all liabilities of such partnership.

In some joint ventures or other investments we may make, if the entity in which we invest is a limited partnership, we may acquire all or a portion of our interest in such partnership as a general partner. As a general partner, we could be liable for all the liabilities of such partnership. Additionally, we may acquire a general partner interest in the form of a non-managing general partner interest. For example, our interest in the Core Fund is in the form of a non-managing general partner interest. As a non-managing general partner, we are potentially liable for all liabilities of the partnership without having the same rights of management or control over the operation of the partnership as the managing general partner. Therefore, we may be held responsible for all of the liabilities of an entity in which we do not have full managem ent rights or control, and our liability may far exceed the amount or value of investment we initially made or then had in the partnership.

Because of our inability to retain earnings, we will rely on debt and equity financings for acquisitions. If we do not have sufficient capital resources from such financings, our growth may be limited.

In order to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we are required to distribute to our shareholders at least 90% of our annual ordinary taxable income. This requirement limits our ability to retain income or cash flow from operations to finance the acquisition of new investments. We will explore acquisition opportunities from time to time with the intention of expanding our operations and increasing our profitability. We anticipate that we will use debt and equity financing for such acquisitions because of our inability to retain significant earnings. Consequently, if we cannot obtain debt or equity financing on acceptable terms, our ability to acquire new investments and expand our operations will be adversely affected.

Our use of borrowings to partially fund acquisitions and improvements on properties could result in foreclosures and unexpected debt service expenses upon refinancing, both of which could have an adverse impact on our operations and cash flow.

We intend to rely in part on borrowings under our credit facilities and other external sources of financing to fund the costs of new investments, capital expenditures and other items. Accordingly, we are subject to the risk that our cash flow will not be sufficient to cover required debt service payments and that we will be unable to meet other covenants or requirements in the credit agreements.

If we cannot meet our required debt obligations, the property or properties subject to indebtedness could be foreclosed upon by, or otherwise transferred to, our lender, with a consequent loss of income and asset value to the Company. For tax purposes, a foreclosure of any of our properties would be treated as a sale of the property for a purchase price equal to the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage. If the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage exceeds our tax basis in the property, we would recognize taxable income on foreclosure, but we may not receive any cash proceeds. Additionally, we may be required to refinance our debt subject to “lump sum” or “balloon” payment maturities on terms less favorable than the original loan or at a time we would otherwise prefer to not r efinance such debt. A refinancing on such terms or at such times could increase our debt service payments, which would decrease the amount of cash we would have available for operations, new investments and dividend payments.

We have acquired and may acquire various financial instruments for purposes of “hedging” or reducing our risks, which may be costly and ineffective and could reduce our cash available for distribution to our shareholders.

Use of derivative instruments for hedging purposes may present significant risks, including the risk of loss of the amounts invested. Defaults by the other party to a hedging transaction can result in losses in the hedging transaction. Hedging activities also involve the risk of an imperfect correlation between the hedging instrument and the instrument being hedged, which could result in losses both on the hedging transaction and on the asset being hedged. Use of hedging activities generally may not prevent significant losses and could increase our losses. Further, hedging transactions may reduce cash available for distribution to our shareholders.

22

The failure of any bank in which we deposit our funds could reduce the amount of cash we have available to pay distributions and make additional investments.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or FDIC, only insures amounts up to $250,000 per depositor per insured bank, which amount will be reduced to $100,000 effective January 1, 2010. We currently have cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash deposited in certain financial institutions in excess of federally insured levels. If any of the banking institutions in which we have deposited funds ultimately fails, we may lose any amount of our deposits over these amounts. The loss of our deposits could reduce the amount of cash we have available to distribute or invest and could result in a decline in the value of your investment.

Our success will be dependent on the performance of Hines as well as key employees of Hines.

Our ability to achieve our investment objectives and to pay dividends is dependent upon the performance of Hines and its affiliates as well as key employees of Hines in the discovery and acquisition of investments, the selection of tenants, the determination of any financing arrangements, the management of our assets and operation of our day-to-day activities. Our board of directors and our Advisor have broad discretion when identifying, evaluating and making investments with the proceeds of this offering. You will have no opportunity to evaluate the terms of transactions or other economic or financial data concerning our investments that are not described in this prospectus. We will rely on the management ability of Hines and the oversight of our board of directors as well as the management of any entities or ventures in which we inve st. If Hines (or any of its key employees) suffers or is distracted by adverse financial or operational problems in connection with its operations unrelated to us, the ability of Hines and its affiliates to allocate time and/or resources to our operations may be adversely affected. If Hines is unable to allocate sufficient resources to oversee and perform our operations for any reason, our results of operations would be adversely impacted. We will not provide key man life insurance policies for any of Hines’ key employees. Please see “— Potential Conflicts of Interest Risks — Employees of the Advisor and Hines will face conflicts of interest relating to time management and allocation of resources and investment opportunities.” The Core Fund is also managed by an affiliate of Hines. Its performance and success is also dependent on Hines and the Core Fund is likewise subject to these risks.

We operate in a competitive business, and many of our competitors have significant resources and operating flexibility, allowing them to compete effectively with us.

Numerous real estate companies that operate in the markets in which we operate or may operate in the future will compete with us in acquiring office and other properties and obtaining creditworthy tenants to occupy such properties. Such competition could adversely affect our business. There are numerous real estate companies, real estate investment trusts and U.S. institutional and foreign investors that will compete with us in seeking investments and tenants for properties. Many of these entities have significant financial and other resources, including operating experience, allowing them to compete effectively with us. In addition, our ability to charge premium rental rates to tenants may be negatively impacted. This increased competition may increase our costs of acquisitions or lower our occupancy rates and the rent we may cha rge tenants.

We depend on tenants for our revenue, and therefore our revenue is dependent on the success and economic viability of our tenants. Our reliance on single or significant tenants in certain buildings may decrease our ability to lease vacated space.

We expect that rental income from real property will, directly or indirectly, constitute substantially all of our income. The inability of a single major tenant or a number of smaller tenants to meet their rental obligations would adversely affect our income. Please see “Our Real Estate Investments” for information about tenants at some of our larger properties. Therefore, our financial success is indirectly dependent on the success of the businesses operated by the tenants in our properties or in the properties securing mortgages we may own. Tenants may have the right to terminate their leases upon the occurrence of certain customary events of default and, in other circumstances, may not renew their leases or, because of market conditions, may be able to renew their leases on terms that are less favorable to us than the te rms of the current leases. The weakening of the financial condition of a significant tenant or a number of smaller tenants and vacancies caused by defaults of tenants or the expiration of leases, may adversely affect our operations.

23

Some of our properties may be leased to a single or significant tenant and, accordingly, may be suited to the particular or unique needs of such tenant. We may have difficulty replacing such a tenant if the floor plan of the vacant space limits the types of businesses that can use the space without major renovation. In addition, the resale value of the property could be diminished because the market value of a particular property will depend principally upon the value of the leases of such property.

The bankruptcy or insolvency of a major tenant may adversely impact our operations and our ability to pay dividends.

The bankruptcy or insolvency of a significant tenant or a number of smaller tenants may have an adverse impact on our income and our ability to pay dividends. Generally, under bankruptcy law, a debtor tenant has 120 days to exercise the option of assuming or rejecting the obligations under any unexpired lease for nonresidential real property, which period may be extended once by the bankruptcy court. If the tenant assumes its lease, the tenant must cure all defaults under the lease and may be required to provide adequate assurance of its future performance under the lease. If the tenant rejects the lease, we will have a claim against the tenant’s bankruptcy estate. Although rent owing for the period between filing for bankruptcy and rejection of the lease may be afforded administrative expense priority and paid in full, pre- bankruptcy arrears and amounts owing under the remaining term of the lease will be afforded general unsecured claim status (absent collateral securing the claim). Moreover, amounts owing under the remaining term of the lease will be capped. Other than equity and subordinated claims, general unsecured claims are the last claims paid in a bankruptcy and therefore funds may not be available to pay such claims in full.

Unfavorable changes in economic conditions could adversely impact occupancy or rental rates

Unfavorable economic conditions may significantly affect office building occupancy or rental rates. Declining or lower occupancy and rental rates in the markets in which we operate, in turn, may have a material adverse impact on our cash flows, operating results and carrying value of investment property. The risks that may affect conditions in these markets include the following:

• Changes in the national, regional and local economic climates;

• Local conditions, such as an oversupply of office space or a reduction in demand for office space in the area;

• Economic downturns which simultaneously affect more than one of our geographical markets; and

• Increased operating costs, if these costs cannot be passed through to tenants.

National, regional and local economic climates may be adversely affected should population or job growth slow. To the extent either of these conditions occurs in the markets in which we operate, market rents will likely be affected. We could also face challenges related to adequately managing and maintaining our properties, should we experience increased operating costs. As a result, we may experience a loss of rental revenues, which may adversely affect our results of operations and our ability to satisfy our financial obligations and to pay distributions to our shareholders.

Uninsured losses relating to real property may adversely impact the value of our portfolio.

We attempt to ensure that all of our properties are adequately insured to cover casualty losses. However, there are types of losses, generally catastrophic in nature, which are uninsurable, are not economically insurable or are only insurable subject to limitations. Examples of such catastrophic events include acts of war or terrorism, earthquakes, floods, hurricanes and pollution or environmental matters.

24

We may not have adequate coverage in the event we or our buildings suffer casualty losses. If we do not have adequate insurance coverage, the value of our assets will be reduced as the result of, and to the extent of, any such uninsured losses. Additionally, we may not have access to capital resources to repair or reconstruct any uninsured damage to a property.

We may be unable to obtain desirable types of insurance coverage at a reasonable cost, if at all, and we may be unable to comply with insurance requirements contained in mortgage or other agreements due to high insurance costs.

We may not be able either to obtain certain desirable types of insurance coverage, such as terrorism insurance, or to obtain such coverage at a reasonable cost in the future, and this risk may inhibit our ability to finance or refinance debt secured by our properties. Additionally, we could default under debt or other agreements if the cost and/or availability of certain types of insurance make it impractical or impossible to comply with covenants relating to the insurance we are required to maintain under such agreements. In such instances, we may be required to self-insure against certain losses or seek other forms of financial assurance.

Terrorist attacks and other acts of violence or war may affect the markets in which we operate, our operations and our profitability.

Terrorist attacks may negatively affect our operations and your investment in our shares. Such attacks or armed conflicts may directly impact the value of our properties through damage, destruction, loss or increased security costs. Hines has historically owned and managed office properties, generally in major metropolitan or suburban areas. We have also invested and expect that we will continue to invest in such properties. For example, the Core Fund owns interests in properties located in New York City and Washington, D.C. We and the Core Fund also own buildings in the central business districts of other major metropolitan cities. Insurance risks associated with potential acts of terrorism against office and other properties in major metropolitan areas could sharply increase the premiums we pay for coverage against property and casualty claims. Additionally, mortgage lenders in some cases have begun to insist that specific coverage against terrorism be purchased by commercial owners as a condition for providing loans. We may not be able to obtain insurance against the risk of terrorism because it may not be available or may not be available on terms that are economically feasible. We intend to obtain terrorism insurance, but the terrorism insurance that we obtain may not be sufficient to cover loss for damages to our properties as a result of terrorist attacks. In addition, certain losses resulting from these types of events are uninsurable and others may not be covered by our terrorism insurance. Terrorism insurance may not be available at a reasonable price or at all.

The consequences of any armed conflict are unpredictable, and we may not be able to foresee events that could have an adverse effect on our business or your investment. More generally, any of these events could result in increased volatility in, or damage to, the United States and worldwide financial markets and economy. They also could result in a continuation of the current economic uncertainty in the United States or abroad. Our revenues will be dependent upon payment of rent by tenants, which may be particularly vulnerable to uncertainty in the local economy. Adverse economic conditions could affect the ability of our tenants to pay rent, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition, as well as our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.

Our operations will be directly affected by general economic and regulatory factors we cannot control or predict.

One of the risks of investing in real estate is the possibility that our properties could further decrease in value or will not generate income sufficient to meet operating expenses or will generate income and capital appreciation, if any, at rates lower than those anticipated or available through investments in comparable real estate or other investments. A significant number of the properties in which we own an interest and expect to acquire are office buildings located in major metropolitan or suburban areas. Please see the “Our Real Estate Investments” section of this prospectus. These types of properties, and the tenants that lease space in such properties, may be impacted to a greater extent by a national economic slowdown or disruption when compared to other types of properties such as residential and retail properti es. The following factors may affect income from such properties, our ability to sell properties and yields from investments in properties and are generally outside of our control:

25

• conditions in financial markets and general economic conditions;

• terrorist attacks and international instability;

• natural disasters and acts of God;

• over-building;

• adverse national, state or local changes in applicable tax, environmental or zoning laws; and

• a taking of any of our properties by eminent domain.

Volatility in debt markets could impact future acquisitions and values of real estate assets potentially reducing cash available for distribution to our shareholders.

The commercial real estate debt markets have recently been adversely affected by certain factors including the tightening of underwriting standards by lenders and credit rating agencies and the significant inventory of unsold Collateralized Mortgage Backed Securities in the market. Additionally, the deteriorating economic environment continues to have an adverse impact on real estate fundamentals which has led to declining property values. These factors, among others, have resulted in lenders decreasing the availability of debt financing as well as increasing the cost of debt financing. Should the overall availability of debt decrease and/or the cost of borrowings increase, either by increases in the index rates or by increases in lender spreads, such factors will impact our ability to complete future acquisitions at prices, including financing terms, that are acceptable to us or at all. This may result in future acquisitions generating lower overall economic returns and potentially reducing future cash flow available for distribution to our shareholders.

In addition, the state of the debt markets have had an impact on the overall amount of capital investing in real estate which has resulted in price or value decreases of real estate assets. Although this may benefit us for future acquisitions, it has negatively impacted the current value of our existing assets and could make it more difficult for us to sell any of our investments if we were to determine to do so.

We may have difficulty selling real estate investments, and our ability to distribute all or a portion of the net proceeds from such sale to our shareholders may be limited.

Equity real estate investments are relatively illiquid. We will have a limited ability to vary our portfolio in response to changes in economic or other conditions. We will also have a limited ability to sell assets in order to fund working capital and similar capital needs such as share redemptions. We expect to generally hold a property for the long term. When we sell any of our properties, we may not realize a gain on such sale or the amount of our taxable gain could exceed the cash proceeds we receive from such sale. We may not distribute any proceeds from the sale of properties to our shareholders; for example, we may use such proceeds to:

• purchase additional properties;

• repay debt;

• buy out interests of any co-venturers or other partners in any joint venture in which we are a party;

• purchase shares under our share redemption program;

• create working capital reserves; or

• make repairs, maintenance, tenant improvements or other capital improvements or expenditures to our other properties.

Our ability to sell our properties may also be limited by our need to avoid a 100% penalty tax that is imposed on gain recognized by a REIT from the sale of property characterized as dealer property. In order to avoid such characterization and to take advantage of certain safe harbors under the Code, we may determine to hold our properties for a minimum period of time, generally four years.

26

Potential liability as the result of, and the cost of compliance with, environmental matters could adversely affect our operations.

Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of real property may be liable for the cost of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances on such property. Such laws often impose liability whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances.

While we invest primarily in institutional-quality office properties, we may also invest in properties historically used for industrial, manufacturing and commercial purposes. Some of these properties are more likely to contain, or may have contained, underground storage tanks for the storage of petroleum products and other hazardous or toxic substances. All of these operations create a potential for the release of petroleum products or other hazardous or toxic substances. Leasing properties to tenants that engage in industrial, manufacturing, and commercial activities will cause us to be subject to increased risk of liabilities under environmental laws and regulations. The presence of hazardous or toxic substances, or the failure to properly remediate these substances, may adversely affect our ability to sell, rent or pledge such prop erty as collateral for future borrowings.

Environmental laws also may impose restrictions on the manner in which properties may be used or businesses may be operated, and these restrictions may require expenditures. Such laws may be amended so as to require compliance with stringent standards which could require us to make unexpected, substantial expenditures. Environmental laws provide for sanctions in the event of noncompliance and may be enforced by governmental agencies or, in certain circumstances, by private parties. We may be potentially liable for such costs in connection with the acquisition and ownership of our properties in the United States. In addition, we may invest in properties located in countries that have adopted laws or observe environmental management standards that are less stringent than those generally followed in the United States, which may pose a gre ater risk that releases of hazardous or toxic substances have occurred to the environment. The cost of defending against claims of liability, of compliance with environmental regulatory requirements or of remediating any contaminated property could be substantial and require a material portion of our cash flow.

All of our properties will be subject to property taxes that may increase in the future, which could adversely affect our cash flow.

Our properties are subject to real and personal property taxes that may increase as property tax rates change and as the properties are assessed or reassessed by taxing authorities. We anticipate that most of our leases will generally provide that the property taxes, or increases therein, are charged to the lessees as an expense related to the properties that they occupy. As the owner of the properties, however, we are ultimately responsible for payment of the taxes to the government. If property taxes increase, our tenants may be unable to make the required tax payments, ultimately requiring us to pay the taxes. In addition, we will generally be responsible for property taxes related to any vacant space. If we purchase residential properties, the leases for such properties typically will not allow us to pass through real estate taxes and other taxes to residents of such properties. Consequently, any tax increases may adversely affect our results of operations at such properties.

Our costs associated with complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act may affect cash available for distributions.

Our properties are generally expected to be subject to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (the “ADA”). Under the ADA, all places of public accommodation are required to comply with federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. The ADA has separate compliance requirements for “public accommodations” and “commercial facilities” that generally require that buildings and services be made accessible and available to people with disabilities. The ADA’s requirements could require removal of access barriers and could result in the imposition of injunctive relief, monetary penalties or, in some cases, an award of damages. We attempt to acquire properties that comply with the ADA or place the burden on the seller or other third-party, such as a tenant, to ensure compliance with the ADA. However, we may not be able to acquire properties or allocate responsibilities in this manner. If we cannot, our funds used for ADA compliance may affect cash available for distributions and the amount of distributions to you.

27

If we set aside insufficient working capital reserves, we may be required to defer necessary or desirable property improvements.

If we do not establish sufficient reserves for working capital to supply necessary funds for capital improvements or similar expenses, we may be required to defer necessary or desirable improvements to our properties. If we defer such improvements, the applicable properties may decline in value, it may be more difficult for us to attract or retain tenants to such properties or the amount of rent we are able to charge at such properties may decrease.

We are subject to additional risks from our international investments.

We own a mixed-use office and retail complex in Toronto, Ontario and have direct and indirect interests in four industrial properties in Brazil. We may purchase additional properties located outside the United States and may make or purchase loans or participations in loans secured by property located outside the United States. These investments may be affected by factors peculiar to the laws and business practices of the jurisdictions in which the properties are located. These laws and business practices may expose us to risks that are different from and in addition to those commonly found in the United States. Foreign investments pose the following risks:

• the burden of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws, including:

• changing governmental rules and policies, including changes in land use and zoning laws, more stringent environmental laws or changes in such laws; and

• existing or new laws relating to the foreign ownership of real property or loans and laws restricting the ability of foreign persons or companies to remove profits earned from activities within the country to the person’s or company’s country of origin;

• the potential for expropriation;

• possible currency transfer restrictions;

• imposition of adverse or confiscatory taxes;

• changes in real estate and other tax rates and changes in other operating expenses in particular countries;

• possible challenges to the anticipated tax treatment of the structures that allow us to acquire and hold investments;

• adverse market conditions caused by terrorism, civil unrest and changes in national or local governmental or economic conditions;

• the willingness of domestic or foreign lenders to make loans in certain countries and changes in the availability, cost and terms of loan funds resulting from varying national economic policies;

• general political and economic instability in certain regions;

• the potential difficulty of enforcing obligations in other countries; and

• Hines’ limited experience and expertise in foreign countries relative to its experience and expertise in the United States.

Investments in properties outside the United States may subject us to foreign currency risks, which may adversely affect distributions and our REIT status.

Our investments outside the United States are subject to foreign currency risk due to potential fluctuations in exchange rates between foreign currencies and the U.S. dollar. As a result, changes in exchange rates of any such foreign currency to U.S. dollars may affect our revenues, operating margins and distributions and may also affect the book value of our assets and the amount of shareholders’ equity.

28

Changes in foreign currency exchange rates used to value a REIT’s foreign assets may be considered changes in the value of the REIT’s assets. These changes may adversely affect our status as a REIT. Further, bank accounts in foreign currency which are not considered cash or cash equivalents may adversely affect our status as a REIT.

Retail properties depend on anchor tenants to attract shoppers and could be adversely affected by the loss of a key anchor tenant.

As with our office properties, we are subject to the risk that tenants of our retail properties may be unable to make their lease payments or may decline to extend a lease upon its expiration. A lease termination by a tenant that occupies a large area of a retail center (commonly referred to as an anchor tenant) could impact leases of other tenants. Other tenants may be entitled to modify the terms of their existing leases in the event of a lease termination by an anchor tenant, or the closure of the business of an anchor tenant that leaves its space vacant even if the anchor tenant continues to pay rent. Any such modifications or conditions could be unfavorable to us as the property owner and could decrease rents or expense recoveries. Additionally, major tenant closures may result in decreased customer traffic, which could lead to de creased sales at other stores. In the event of default by a tenant or anchor store, we may experience delays and costs in enforcing our rights as landlord to recover amounts due to us under the terms of our agreements with those parties.

If we make or invest in loans, our loans may be impacted by unfavorable real estate market conditions, which could decrease the value of our loan investments.

If we make or invest in loans, we will be at risk of defaults by the borrowers on those loans. These defaults may be caused by many conditions beyond our control, including interest rate levels and local and other economic conditions affecting real estate values. With respect to loans secured by real property, we will not know whether the values of the properties securing the loans will remain at the levels existing on the dates of origination of the loans. If the values of the underlying properties drop, our risk will increase because of the lower value of the security associated with such loans.

If we make or invest in loans, our loans will be subject to interest rate fluctuations, which could reduce our returns as compared to market interest rates as well as the value of the loans in the event we sell the loans.

If we invest in fixed-rate, long-term loans and interest rates rise, the loans could yield a return that is lower than then-current market rates. If interest rates decrease, we will be adversely affected to the extent that loans are prepaid, because we may not be able to make new loans at the previously higher interest rate. If we invest in variable interest rate loans, if interest rates decrease, our revenues will likewise decrease. Finally, if interest rates increase, the value of loans we own at such time would decrease which would lower the proceeds we would receive in the event we sell such assets.

Delays in liquidating defaulted loans could reduce our investment returns.

If there are defaults under our loans secured by real property, we may not be able to repossess and sell the underlying properties quickly. The resulting time delay could reduce the value of our investment in the defaulted loans. An action to foreclose on a property securing a loan is regulated by state statutes and rules and is subject to many of the delays and expenses of other lawsuits if the defendant raises defenses or counterclaims. In the event of default by a borrower, these restrictions, among other things, may impede our ability to foreclose on or sell the secured property or to obtain proceeds sufficient to repay all amounts due to us on the loan.

29

We may make or invest in mezzanine loans, which involve greater risks of loss than senior loans secured by real properties.

We may make or invest in mezzanine loans that generally take the form of subordinated loans secured by second mortgages on the underlying real property or loans secured by a pledge of the ownership interests of an entity that directly or indirectly owns real property. These types of investments involve a higher degree of risk than long-term senior mortgage loans secured by real property because the investment may become unsecured as a result of foreclosure by the senior lender. In the event of a bankruptcy of the entity providing the pledge of its ownership interests as security, we may not have full recourse to the assets of such entity, or the assets of the entity may not be sufficient to satisfy our mezzanine loan. If a borrower defaults on our mezzanine loan or debt senior to our mezzanine loan, or in the event of a borrower bankru ptcy, our mezzanine loan will be satisfied only after the senior debt. As a result, we may not recover some or all of our investment. In addition, mezzanine loans may have higher loan-to-value ratios than traditional mortgage loans, resulting in less equity in the real property and increasing our risk of loss of principal.

Our investment policies may change without shareholder approval, which could not only alter the nature of your investment but also subject your investment to new and additional risks.

Except as otherwise provided in our organizational documents, our investment policies and the methods of implementing our investment objectives and policies may be altered by a majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors, without the approval of our shareholders. Please see “Investment Objectives and Policies with Respect to Certain Activities.” We may invest in different property types and/or use different structures to make such investments than we have historically. Please see “— We are subject to risks as the result of joint ownership of real estate with other Hines programs and third parties” and “Investment Objectives and Policies with Respect to Certain Activities — Joint Venture Investments.” As a result, the nature of your investment cou ld change indirectly without your consent and become subject to risks not described in this prospectus.

Potential Conflicts of Interest Risks

We compete with affiliates of Hines for real estate investment opportunities. Some of these affiliates have preferential rights to accept or reject certain investment opportunities in advance of our right to accept or reject such opportunities. Many of the preferential rights we have to accept or reject investment opportunities are subordinate to the preferential rights of at least one affiliate of Hines.

Hines has existing programs with investment objectives and strategies similar to ours. Because we compete with these entities for investment opportunities, Hines faces conflicts of interest in allocating investment opportunities between us and these other entities. We have limited rights to specific investment opportunities located by Hines. Some of these entities have a priority right over other Hines entities, including us, to accept investment opportunities that meet certain defined investment criteria. For example, the Core Fund and other entities sponsored by Hines have the right to accept or reject investments in office properties located in the United States before we have the right to accept such opportunities. Because we and other Hines entities intend to invest primarily in such properties and rely on Hines to present us with investment opportunities, these rights will reduce our investment opportunities. Please see “Conflicts of Interest — Competitive Activities of Hines and its Affiliates” for a description of some of these entities and priority rights. We therefore may not be able to accept, or we may only invest indirectly with or through another Hines affiliated-entity in, certain investments we otherwise would make directly. To the extent we invest in opportunities with another entity affiliated with Hines, we may not have the control over such investment we would otherwise have if we owned all of or otherwise controlled such assets. Please see “— Business and Real Estate Risks — We are subject to risks as the result of joint ownership of real estate with other Hines programs and third parties” above.

Other than the rights described in the “Conflicts of Interest — Investment Opportunity Allocation Procedure” section of this prospectus, we do not have rights to specific investment opportunities located by Hines. In addition, our right to participate in the allocation process described in such section will terminate once we have fully invested the proceeds of this offering or if we are no longer advised by an affiliate of Hines. For investment opportunities not covered by the allocation procedure described herein, Hines will decide in its discretion, subject to any priority rights it grants or has granted to other Hines-managed or otherwise affiliated programs, how to allocate such opportunities among us, Hines and other programs or entities sponsored or managed by or otherwise affiliated with Hines. Because we do not have a right to accept or reject any investment opportunities before Hines or one or more Hines affiliates have the right to accept such opportunities, and are otherwise subject to Hines’ discretion as to the investment opportunities we will receive, we may not be able to review and/or invest in opportunities which we would otherwise pursue if we were the only program sponsored by Hines or had a priority right in regard to such investments. We are subject to the risk that, as a result of the conflicts of interest between Hines, us and other entities or programs sponsored or managed by or affiliated with Hines, and the priority rights Hines has granted or may in the future grant to any such other entities or programs, we may not be offered favorable investment opportunities located by Hines when it would otherwise be in our best interest to accept such investment opportunities, and our results of operations and ability to pay dividends may be adversely impacted thereby.

30

We may compete with other entities affiliated with Hines for tenants.

Hines and its affiliates are not prohibited from engaging, directly or indirectly, in any other business or from possessing interests in any other business venture or ventures, including businesses and ventures involved in the acquisition, development, ownership, management, leasing or sale of real estate projects. Hines or its affiliates own and/or manage properties in most if not all geographical areas in which we own or expect to acquire interests in real estate assets. Therefore, our properties compete for tenants with other properties owned and/or managed by Hines and its affiliates. Hines may face conflicts of interest when evaluating tenant opportunities for our properties and other properties owned and/or managed by Hines and its affiliates and these conflicts of interest may have a negative impact on our ability to attract and retain tenants. Please see “Conflicts of Interest — Competitive Activities of Our Officers and Directors, the Advisor and Other Hines Affiliates” for a description of these conflicts of interest.

Employees of the Advisor and Hines will face conflicts of interest relating to time management and allocation of resources and investment opportunities.

We do not have employees. Pursuant to a contract with Hines, the Advisor relies on employees of Hines and its affiliates to manage and operate our business. Hines is not restricted from acquiring, developing, operating, managing, leasing or selling real estate through entities other than us and Hines will continue to be actively involved in real estate operations and activities other than our operations and activities. Hines currently controls and/or operates other entities that own properties in many of the markets in which we will seek to invest. Hines spends a material amount of time managing these properties and other assets unrelated to our business. Our business may suffer as a result because we lack the ability to manage it without the time and attention of Hines’ employees. We encourage you to read the “Conflicts of Interest” section of this prospectus for a further discussion of these topics.

Hines and its affiliates are general partners and sponsors of other real estate programs having investment objectives and legal and financial obligations similar to ours. Because Hines and its affiliates have interests in other real estate programs and also engage in other business activities, they may have conflicts of interest in allocating their time and resources among our business and these other activities. Our officers and directors, as well as those of the Advisor, own equity interests in entities affiliated with Hines from which we may buy properties. These individuals may make substantial profits in connection with such transactions, which could result in conflicts of interest. Likewise, such individuals could make substantial profits as the result of investment opportunities allocated to entities affiliated with Hines other than us. As a result of these interests, they could pursue transactions that may not be in our best interest. Also, if Hines suffers financial or operational problems as the result of any of its activities, whether or not related to our business, its ability to operate our business could be adversely impacted. During times of intense activity in other programs and ventures, they may devote less time and resources to our business than is necessary or desirable.

Hines may face conflicts of interest if it sells properties it acquires or develops to us.

We have acquired, and may in the future acquire, properties from Hines and affiliates of Hines. Likewise, the Core Fund has acquired, and may in the future acquire, properties from Hines and affiliates of Hines. We may acquire properties Hines currently owns or hereafter acquires from third parties. Hines may also develop properties and then sell the completed properties to us. Similarly, we may provide development loans to Hines in connection with these developments. Hines, its affiliates and its employees (including our officers and directors) may make substantial profits in connection with such transactions. We must follow certain procedures when purchasing assets from Hines and its affiliates. Please see “Investment Objectives and Policies With Respect to Certain Activities — Acquisition and Investment Policies 0;— Affiliate Transaction Policy” below. Hines may owe fiduciary and/or other duties to the selling entity in these transactions and conflicts of interest between us and the selling entities could exist in such transactions. Because we are relying on Hines, these conflicts could result in transactions based on terms that are less favorable to us than we would receive from a third party.

31

Hines may face a conflict of interest when determining whether we should dispose of any property we own that is managed by Hines because Hines may lose fees associated with the management of the property.

We expect that Hines will manage most, if not all, of the properties we acquire directly as well as most, if not all, of the properties in which we acquire an indirect interest as a result of investments in Hines affiliated entities, such as the Core Fund. Because Hines receives significant fees for managing these properties, it may face a conflict of interest when determining whether we should sell properties under circumstances where Hines would no longer manage the property after the transaction. As a result of this conflict of interest, we may not dispose of properties when it would be in our best interests to do so.

Hines may face conflicts of interest in connection with the management of our day-to-day operations and in the enforcement of agreements between Hines and its affiliates.

Hines and the Advisor manage our day-to-day operations and properties pursuant to property management agreements and an advisory agreement. These agreements were not negotiated at arm’s length and certain fees payable by us under such agreements are paid regardless of our performance.

Hines and its affiliates may be in a conflict of interest position as to matters relating to these agreements. Examples include the computation of fees and reimbursements under such agreements, the enforcement and/or termination of the agreements and the priority of payments to third parties as opposed to amounts paid to affiliates of Hines. These fees may be higher than fees charged by third parties in an arm’s-length transaction as a result of these conflicts.

Certain of our officers and directors face conflicts of interest relating to the positions they hold with other entities.

Certain of our officers and directors are also officers and directors of the Advisor and other entities controlled by Hines such as the managing general partner of the Core Fund. Some of these entities may compete with us for investment and leasing opportunities. These personnel owe fiduciary duties to these other entities and their security holders and these duties may from time to time conflict with the fiduciary duties such individuals owe to us and our shareholders. For example, conflicts of interest adversely affecting our investment decisions could arise in decisions or activities related to:

• the allocation of new investments among us and other entities operated by Hines;

• the allocation of time and resources among us and other entities operated by Hines;

• the timing and terms of the investment in or sale of an asset;

• investments with Hines and affiliates of Hines;

• the compensation paid to our Advisor; and

• our relationship with Hines in the management of our properties.

32

These conflicts of interest may also be impacted by the fact that such individuals may have compensation structures tied to the performance of such other entities controlled by Hines and these compensation structures may potentially provide for greater remuneration in the event an investment opportunity is presented to a Hines affiliate rather than us.

Our officers and directors have limited liability.

Generally, we are obligated under our charter and the bylaws to indemnify our officers and directors against certain liabilities incurred in connection with their services. We have also executed indemnification agreements with each officer and director and agreed to indemnify them for any such liabilities that they incur. These indemnification agreements, as well as the indemnification provisions in our charter and bylaws, could limit our ability and the ability of our shareholders to effectively take action against our officers and directors arising from their service to us. In addition, there could be a potential reduction in dividends resulting from our payment of premiums associated with insurance or payments of a defense, settlement or claim. You should read the section of this prospectus under the caption “Management & #8212; Limited Liability and Indemnification of Directors, Officers, Employees and Other Agents” for more information about the indemnification of our officers and directors.

Our UPREIT structure may result in potential conflicts of interest.

Persons holding OP Units have the right to vote on certain amendments to the Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership, as well as on certain other matters. Persons holding such voting rights may exercise them in a manner that conflicts with the interests of our shareholders. As general partner of the Operating Partnership, we will be obligated to act in a manner that is in the best interest of all partners of the Operating Partnership. Circumstances may arise in the future when the interests of limited partners in the Operating Partnership may conflict with the interests of our shareholders.

Tax Risks

If we fail to qualify as a REIT, our operations and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders would be adversely impacted.

We believe we qualify as a REIT under the Code.  A REIT generally is not taxed at the corporate level on income it currently distributes to its shareholders. Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex rules for which there are only limited judicial or administrative interpretations. The determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control may affect our ability to continue to qualify as a REIT. In addition, new legislation, regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions could significantly change the tax laws with respect to qualification as a REIT or the federal income tax consequences of such qualification.

Investments in foreign real property may be subject to foreign currency gains and losses. Foreign currency gains may not be qualifying income for purposes of the REIT income requirements. To reduce the risk of foreign currency gains adversely affecting our REIT qualification, we may be required to defer the repatriation of cash from foreign jurisdictions or to employ other structures that could affect the timing, character or amount of income we receive from our foreign investments. No assurance can be given that we will be able to manage our foreign currency gains in a manner that enables us to qualify as a REIT or to avoid U.S. federal and other taxes on our income as a result of foreign currency gains.

If we were to fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year:

• we would not be allowed to deduct our dividends to our shareholders when computing our taxable income;

• we would be subject to federal income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on our taxable income at regular corporate rates;

33

• we would be disqualified from being taxed as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification was lost, unless entitled to relief under certain statutory provisions;

• our cash available for distribution would be reduced and we would have less cash to distribute to our shareholders; and

• we might be required to borrow additional funds or sell some of our assets in order to pay corporate tax obligations we may incur as a result of our disqualification.

We encourage you to read the “Material Tax Considerations” section of this prospectus for further discussion of the tax issues related to this offering.

If the Operating Partnership is classified as a “publicly traded partnership” under the Code, our operations and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders could be adversely affected.

We structured the Operating Partnership so that it would be classified as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. In this regard, the Code generally classifies “publicly traded partnerships” (as defined in Section 7704 of the Code) as associations taxable as corporations (rather than as partnerships), unless substantially all of their taxable income consists of specified types of passive income. In order to minimize the risk that the Code would classify the Operating Partnership as a “publicly traded partnership” for tax purposes, we placed certain restrictions on the transfer and/or redemption of partnership units in the Operating Partnership. Please see “— If we fail to qualify as a REIT, our operations and ability to pay dividends to our shareholders would be adversely impacted 221; above. In addition, the imposition of a corporate tax on the Operating Partnership would reduce our amount of cash available for distribution to you.

These topics are discussed in greater detail in the “Material Tax Considerations — Tax Aspects of the Operating Partnership” section of this prospectus.

Dividends to tax-exempt investors may be classified as unrelated business taxable income.

Neither ordinary nor capital gain distributions with respect to our common shares nor gain from the sale of common shares should generally constitute unrelated business taxable income to a tax-exempt investor. However, there are certain exceptions to this rule. In particular:

• part of the income and gain recognized by certain qualified employee pension trusts with respect to our common shares may be treated as unrelated business taxable income if our stock is predominately held by qualified employee pension trusts, we are required to rely on a special look through rule for purposes of meeting one of the REIT stock ownership tests, and we are not operated in such a manner as to otherwise avoid treatment of such income or gain as unrelated business taxable income;

• part of the income and gain recognized by a tax exempt investor with respect to our common shares would constitute unrelated business taxable income if such investor incurs debt in order to acquire the common shares; and

• part or all of the income or gain recognized with respect to our common shares by social clubs, voluntary employee benefit associations, supplemental unemployment benefit trusts and qualified group legal services plans which are exempt from federal income taxation under Sections 501(c)(7), (9), (17), or (20) of the Code may be treated as unrelated business taxable income.

We encourage you to read the “Material Tax Considerations — Taxation of Tax Exempt Entities” section of this prospectus for further discussion of this issue if you are a tax-exempt investor.

Investors may realize taxable income without receiving cash dividends.

If you participate in the dividend reinvestment plan, you will be required to take into account, in computing your taxable income, ordinary and capital gain dividend distributions allocable to shares you own, even though you receive no cash because such dividends and/or distributions are reinvested. In addition, the difference between the public offering price of our shares and the amount paid for shares purchased pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan may be deemed to be taxable as income to participants in the plan.

34

Foreign investors may be subject to FIRPTA tax on sale of common shares if we are unable to qualify as a “domestically controlled” REIT.

A foreign person disposing of a U.S. real property interest, including shares of a U.S. corporation whose assets consist principally of U.S. real property interests, is generally subject to a tax, known as FIRPTA tax, on the gain recognized on the disposition. Such FIRPTA tax does not apply, however, to the disposition of stock in a REIT if the REIT is “domestically controlled.” A REIT is “domestically controlled” if less than 50% of the REIT’s capital stock, by value, has been owned directly or indirectly by persons who are not qualifying U.S. persons during a continuous five-year period ending on the date of disposition or, if shorter, during the entire period of the REIT’s existence.

We cannot assure you that we will qualify as a “domestically controlled” REIT. If we were to fail to so qualify, gain realized by foreign investors on a sale of our common shares would be subject to FIRPTA tax, unless our common shares were traded on an established securities market and the foreign investor did not at any time during a specified testing period directly or indirectly own more than 5% of the value of our outstanding common shares. We encourage you to read the “Material Tax Considerations — Taxation of Foreign Investors — Sales of Shares” section of this prospectus for a further discussion of this issue.

In certain circumstances, we may be subject to federal and state income taxes as a REIT or other state or local income taxes, which would reduce our cash available to pay dividends to our shareholders.

Even if we qualify and maintain our status as a REIT, we may be subject to federal income taxes or state taxes. For example, if we have net income from a “prohibited transaction,” such income will be subject to a 100% tax. We may not be able to make sufficient distributions to avoid paying federal income tax and/or the 4% excise tax that generally applies to income retained by a REIT. We may also decide to retain income we earn from the sale or other disposition of our property and pay income tax directly on such income. In that event, our shareholders would be treated as if they earned that income and paid the tax on it directly. However, shareholders that are tax-exempt, such as charities or qualified pension plans, would have no benefit from their deemed payment of such tax liability. We may also be subject to state and local taxes on our income or property, either directly or at the level of the Operating Partnership or at the level of the other companies through which we indirectly own our assets.

Entities through which we hold foreign real estate investments are, in most cases, subject to foreign taxes, notwithstanding our status as a REIT.

Even if we maintain our status as a REIT, entities through which we hold investments in assets located outside the United States will, in most cases, be subject to income taxation by jurisdictions in which such assets are located. Our cash available for distribution to our shareholders will be reduced by any such foreign income taxes.

Recently enacted tax legislation may make REIT investments comparatively less attractive than investments in other corporate entities.

Under current law, qualifying corporate distributions received by individuals prior to 2011 are subject to tax at a maximum rate of 15%. This special tax rate is generally not applicable to distributions paid by a REIT, unless such distributions represent earnings on which the REIT itself has been taxed. As a result, distributions (other than capital gain distributions) paid by us to individual investors will generally be subject to the tax rates that are otherwise applicable to ordinary income which currently are as high as 35%. This law change may make an investment in our common shares comparatively less attractive relative to an investment in the shares of other corporate entities which pay distributions that are not formed as REITs.

35

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Statements included in this prospectus which are not historical facts (including any statements concerning investment objectives, economic updates, other plans and objectives of management for future operations or economic performance, or assumptions or forecasts related thereto) are forward-looking statements. These statements are only predictions. We caution that forward-looking statements are not guarantees. Actual events or our investments and results of operations could differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by the use of terms such as “may,” “should,” “expect,” “could,” “intend,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,”  220;continue,” “predict,” “potential” or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology.

The forward-looking statements included herein are based on our current expectations, plans, estimates, assumptions and beliefs that involve numerous risks and uncertainties. Assumptions relating to the foregoing involve judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive and market conditions and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond our control. Any of the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements could be inaccurate. To the extent that our assumptions differ from actual results, our ability to meet such forward-looking statements, including our ability to generate positive cash flow from operations, provide distributions to our shareholders and maintain the value of the real estate properties in which we hold an inter est, may be significantly hindered.

You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements included in this prospectus. All forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this prospectus and the risk exists that actual results will differ materially from the expectations expressed in this prospectus and this risk will increase with the passage of time. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included in this prospectus, including, without limitation, the risks set forth in the “Risk Factors” section, the inclusion of such forward-looking statements should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that the objectives and plans set forth in this prospectus will be achieved. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or to persons a cting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by reference to these risks and uncertainties. Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of the particular statement, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements.

ESTIMATED USE OF PROCEEDS

The table on the following page sets forth information about how we intend to use the proceeds raised in this offering and assumes we sell:

• the maximum $3,000,000,000 in shares pursuant to this offering and issue all of the $500,000,000 in shares under our dividend reinvestment plan;

• the maximum $3,000,000,000 in shares pursuant to this offering but issue no shares under our dividend reinvestment plan; and

• the maximum $3,000,000,000 in shares pursuant to this offering and issue all of the $500,000,000 in shares under our dividend reinvestment plan, whereby $750,000,000 (i.e., 25%), of the $3,000,000,000 in shares sold pursuant to this offering are sold to investors who are party to an agreement with a licensed broker dealer, investment advisor or bank trust department pursuant to which the investor pays a fee based on assets under management such as a “wrap fee”, “commission replacement fee”, or similar fee. In such instances, selling commissions and dealer manager fees are waived.

We have not given effect to any other special sales or volume discounts which could also reduce the selling commissions and dealer manager fees.

This is a “best efforts” offering, without a minimum offering. Please see “Risk Factors — Investment Risks — This offering is being conducted on a “best efforts” basis, and the risk that we will not be able to accomplish our business objectives will increase if only a small number of shares are purchased in this offering” and “— If we are only able to sell a small number of shares in this offering, our fixed operating expenses such as general and administrative expense (as a percentage of gross income) would be higher than if we are able to sell a greater number of shares.”

36

Many of the amounts set forth below represent our management’s best estimate since such amounts cannot be precisely calculated at this time. Therefore, these amounts may not accurately reflect the actual receipt or application of the offering proceeds.

Assuming we raise the maximum offering proceeds pursuant to this offering, including proceeds from the sale of all of the shares offered under our dividend reinvestment plan, we expect that approximately 90% of the money you invest will be used to make real estate investments, to the extent that proceeds are not used to redeem shares pursuant to our share redemption program. The balance will be used to pay selling commissions, the dealer manager fee, acquisition fees paid to our Advisor for investing the net offering proceeds and to pay third party acquisition expenses related to those investments.

We have not identified the investments we will make with all of the proceeds of this offering. We will rely on our Advisor and our board of directors to identify and evaluate our future investments. Please see “Risk Factors — Investment Risks — You will not have the opportunity to evaluate the investments we will make with the proceeds of this offering before you purchase our shares, and we may not have the opportunity to evaluate or approve investments made by entities in which we invest, such as the Core Fund.”

	Maximum Offering $3,500,000,000 in Shares(1)					Maximum Offering $3,000,000,000 in Shares(2)					$500,000,000 in Shares from Dividend Reinvestment Plan(3)					Maximum Offering $3,500,000,000 in Shares(4)
	Amount		Percentage			Amount		Percentage			Amount		%			Amount		Percentage
GROSS PROCEEDS	$	3,500,000,000		100	%	$	3,000,000,000		100	%	$	500,000,000		100.0	%	$	3,500,000,000		100	%
Less Expenses:
Selling Commissions(5)	$	210,000,000		6.0	%	$	210,000,000		7.0	%	$	—		0.0	%	$	157,500,000		4.5	%
Dealer Manager Fees(6)	$	66,000,000		1.9	%	$	66,000,000		2.2	%	$	—		0.0	%	$	49,500,000		1.4	%
Organization & Offering Costs(7)	$	0		0	%	$	0		0	%						$	0		0	%
Total Expenses	$	276,000,000		7.9	%	$	276,000,000		9.2	%	$	—		0.0	%	$	207,000,000		5.9	%
NET PROCEEDS AVAILABLE FOR INVESTMENT AND REDEMPTIONS	$	3,224,000,000		92.1	%	$	2,724,000,000		90.8	%	$	500,000,000		100.0	%	$	3,293,000,000		94.1	%
Less:
Acquisition Fees on Investments(8)(9)	$	55,771,000		1.6	%	$	53,294,000		1.8	%	$	12,146,000		2.4	%	$	56,114,000		1.6	%
Third-party Acquisition Expenses(9)(10)	$	14,000,000		0.4	%	$	12,000,000		0.4	%	$	2,000,000		0.4	%	$	14,000,000		0.4	%
Working Capital Reserve	$	—		—	%	$	—		—	%						$	—		—	%
REMAINING PROCEEDS AVAILABLE FOR INVESTMENT AND REDEMPTIONS	$	3,154,229,000		90.1	%	$	2,658,706,000		88.6	%	$	485,854,000		97.2	%	$	3,222,886,000		92.1	%

____________

(1)	Assumes we sell the maximum of $3,000,000,000 in our common shares and issue $500,000,000 in our common shares under our dividend reinvestment plan pursuant to this offering.
(2)	Assumes we sell the maximum $3,000,000,000 in our common shares pursuant to this offering but issue no shares under our dividend reinvestment plan.
(3)	Assumes we sell no shares pursuant to this offering, but issue $500,000,000 in our common shares under our dividend reinvestment plan.
(4)	Assumes we sell the maximum of $3,000,000,000 in our common shares and issue $500,000,000 in our common shares under our dividend reinvestment plan pursuant to this offering, whereby 25% of the $3,000,000,000 in shares sold pursuant to this offering are sold to investors who are party to an agreement with a licensed broker dealer, investment advisor or bank trust department pursuant to which the investor pays a fee based on assets under management such as a “wrap fee”, “commission replacement fee”, or similar fee. In such instances, selling commissions and dealer manager fees are waived.

37

(5)	We will pay the Dealer Manager sales commissions of up to 7.0% for sales of our common shares, except for sales of shares pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan. All of these commissions will be reallowed to participating broker-dealers. The commission may be reduced for volume discounts or waived as further described in the “Plan of Distribution” section of this prospectus; however, for purposes of the first and second columns in this table we have not assumed any such discounts. As specified in footnote 3 above, the third column in this table reflects the waiver of selling commissions with respect to 25% of the shares sold pursuant to this offering.
(6)	We will pay the Dealer Manager a dealer manager fee of up to 2.2% of gross offering proceeds for common shares sold to the public, all or a portion of which may be reallowed to participating broker-dealers as marketing fees, in part to cover fees and costs associated with conferences sponsored by participating broker-dealers and to defray other distribution-related costs and expenses of participating broker-dealers. We will not pay the dealer manager fee for shares issued pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan and certain other purchases as described in the “Plan of Distribution” section of this prospectus. As specified in footnote 3 above, the third column in this table reflects the waiver of dealer manager fees with respect to 25% of the shares sold pursuant to this offering.
(7)	The Advisor will pay for all organization and offering expenses, other than selling commissions and the dealer manager fee, whether incurred by us directly or through the Advisor, the Dealer Manager and/or their affiliates, which expenses are expected to consist of, among other expenses, actual legal, accounting, printing, marketing, filing fees, transfer agent costs and other offering-related expenses. We will have no liability for such expenses.
(8)	With respect to each real estate investment made after the commencement of this offering up to an aggregate of $2,000,000,000 in real estate investments made after the commencement of this offering, we will pay the an acquisition fee of 2.5% of (i) the purchase price of real estate investments acquired directly by us, including any debt attributable to such investments, or (ii) when we make an investment indirectly through another entity, such investment’s pro rata share of the gross asset value of real estate investments held by that entity. With respect to each real estate investment made thereafter, the fee will be equal to 0.50% of the amounts set forth in (i) and (ii), as applicable. For purposes of this table we have assumed that we will not use debt when making real estate investments. In the event we raise the maximum $3,500,000,000 pursuant to this offering and all of our real estate investments are 50% leveraged at the time we acquire them, the total acquisition fees payable will be $71,811,000 or approximately 2.1% of gross proceeds. Some of these fees may be payable out of the proceeds of such borrowings.
(9)	The acquisition fees and acquisition expenses incurred in connection with the purchase of real estate investments will not exceed an amount equal to 6.0% of the contract purchase price of the investment. However, a majority of our directors (including a majority of our independent directors) not otherwise interested in the transaction may approve such fees and expenses in excess of this limit if they determine the transaction to be commercially competitive, fair and reasonable to us.
(10)	Acquisition expenses include customary third-party acquisition costs which are typically included in the gross purchase price of the real estate investments we acquire or are paid by us in connection with such acquisitions. These third-party acquisition costs include legal, accounting, consulting, travel, appraisals, engineering, due diligence, option payments, title insurance and other costs and expenses relating to potential acquisitions regardless of whether the property is actually acquired. For purposes of this table, we have assumed that we will not use debt when making real estate investments.

We will pay the Advisor 1.0% of the amount obtained under any property loan or made available to us under any other debt financing. Actual amounts are dependent upon the amount of any debt incurred in connection with our acquisitions and otherwise and therefore cannot be determined at the present time. In the event we raise the maximum $3,500,000,000 pursuant to this offering and all of our real estate investments are 50% leveraged, the total debt financing fees payable will be $31,811,000. Debt financing fees are expected to be payable out of the proceeds of such borrowings.

The fees, compensation, income, expense reimbursements, interests and other payments described above payable to Hines, the Advisor and other Hines affiliates may increase or decrease during or after this offering, if such increase or decrease is approved by our independent directors.

38

MANAGEMENT

Management of Hines REIT

We operate under the direction of our board of directors. Our board is ultimately responsible for the management and control of our business and operations. We have no employees and have retained the Advisor to manage our day-to-day operations, including the identification and acquisition of our properties, subject to the board’s supervision. We have retained Hines or an affiliate of Hines to perform property management for our properties. We have retained the Dealer Manager to manage activities relating to the offering of our shares.

Our Officers and Directors

Other than our independent directors, each of our officers and directors is affiliated with Hines and subject to conflicts of interest. Please see “Conflicts of Interest” and “Risk Factors — Potential Conflicts of Interest Risks.” As described below, because of the inherent conflicts of interest existing as the result of these relationships, our independent directors will monitor the performance of all Hines affiliates performing services for us, and these board members have a fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of our shareholders in connection with our relationships with Hines affiliates. However, we cannot assure you that our independent directors will be successful in eliminating, or decreasing the impact of the risks resulting from, the conflicts of interest we face with Hines and its aff iliates. Indeed, our independent directors will not monitor or approve all decisions made by Hines that impact us, such as the allocation of investment opportunities.

The following sets forth information about our directors and executive officers:

Name	Age	Position and Office with Hines REIT
Jeffrey C. Hines	53	Chairman of the Board of Directors
C. Hastings Johnson	60	Director
Charles M. Baughn	54	Director
George A. Davis	70	Independent Director
Thomas A. Hassard	58	Independent Director
Stanley D. Levy	45	Independent Director
Paul B. Murphy Jr.	49	Independent Director
Charles N. Hazen	48	President and Chief Executive Officer
Sherri W. Schugart	43	Chief Financial Officer
Edmund A. Donaldson	39	Chief Investment Officer
Frank R. Apollo	42	Senior Vice President — Finance, Treasurer and Secretary
Kevin L. McMeans	44	Asset Management Officer
Ryan T. Sims	37	Chief Accounting Officer

Jeffrey C. Hines.  Mr. Hines joined Hines in 1981. He has served as the Chairman of our board of directors, as Chairman of the managers of the general partner of our Advisor, and as a member of the management board of the Core Fund since August 2003. Mr. Hines has also been the Chairman of the board of directors of Hines Global REIT, Inc., which we refer to as Hines Global, and Chairman of the managers of the general partner of the advisor of Hines Global since December 2008. He is also the co-owner and President and Chief Executive Officer of the general partner of Hines and is a member of Hines’ Executive Committee. Mr. Hines is responsible for overseeing all firm policies and procedures as well as day-to-day operations. He became President in 199 0 and Chief Executive Officer in January 2008 and has overseen a major expansion of the firm’s personnel, financial resources, domestic and foreign market penetration, products and services. He has been a major participant in the development of the Hines domestic and international acquisition program and currently oversees a portfolio of 238 projects valued at approximately $25.8 billion. Mr. Hines graduated from Williams College with a B.A. in Economics and received his M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.

39

C. Hastings Johnson.  Mr. Johnson joined Hines in 1978. He has served as a member of our board of directors, as a member of the managers of the general partner of our Advisor, and as a member of the management board of the Core Fund since July 2004. Mr. Johnson has also been a member of the board of directors of Hines Global and a member of the managers of the general partner of the advisor of Hines Global since December 2008. In addition, he has served as Vice Chairman of the general partner of Hines since January 2008 and Chief Financial Officer of the general partner of Hines since 1992. In these roles, he is responsible for the financial policies, equity financing and the joint venture relationships of Hines. He is also a member of Hines’ Execut ive Committee. Prior to becoming Chief Financial Officer of the general partner of Hines, he led the development or redevelopment of numerous projects and initiated the Hines acquisition program. Total debt and equity capital committed to equity projects sponsored by Hines during Mr. Johnson’s tenure as Chief Financial Officer has exceeded $46 billion. Mr. Johnson graduated from the Georgia Institute of Technology with a B.S. in Industrial Engineering and received his M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.

Charles M. Baughn.  Mr. Baughn has served as a member of our board of directors since April 2008 and as a manager of the general partner of our Advisor since August 2003. He served as Chief Executive Officer for us and the general partner of our Advisor from August 2003 through April 1, 2008. In addition, Mr. Baughn has been a member of the board of directors of Hines Global and a manager of the general partner of the advisor of Hines Global since December 2008. He has also served as an Executive Vice President and CEO — Capital Markets Group of the general partner of Hines since April 2001 and, as such, is responsible for overseeing Hines’ capital markets group, which raises, places and manages equity and debt for Hines projects, a membe r of Hines’ Executive Committee and the Chief Executive Officer and a director of our Dealer Manager. Mr. Baughn is also a member of the management board of the Core Fund. Mr. Baughn joined Hines in 1984. During his tenure at Hines, he has contributed to the development or redevelopment of over nine million square feet of office and special use facilities in the southwestern United States. He graduated from the New York State College of Ceramics at Alfred University with a B.A. and received his M.B.A. from the University of Colorado. Mr. Baughn holds Series 7, 24 and 63 securities licenses.

George A. Davis.  Mr. Davis, an independent director since June 2004, is the founder and sole owner of Advisor Real Estate Investment Ltd., a real estate consulting company unaffiliated with our Advisor. Prior to founding Advisor Real Estate Investment Ltd. in April 1999, he served as the Chief Real Estate Investment Officer for the New York State Teacher’s Retirement System (“NYSTRS”) reporting directly to the Executive Director of the system. In addition, Mr. Davis also served as a member of the Investment Committee, which ultimately determined the real estate investment strategy undertaken by NYSTRS. Mr. Davis graduated from Dartmouth College with a B.A. in Biology.

Thomas A. Hassard.  Mr. Hassard, an independent director since June 2004, served as the Managing Director for Real Estate Investments for the Virginia Retirement System for almost 20 years before retiring in December 2004. His responsibilities included managing the real estate investments of the system, monitoring performance and reporting to the system’s investment advisory committee and board of trustees. Mr. Hassard graduated from Western New England College with a B.S. in Business Administration.

Stanley D. Levy.  Mr. Levy, an independent director since June 2004, currently serves as Chief Operating Officer of The Morgan Group, Inc., a national multi-family real estate firm with offices in Houston, San Diego and Orlando. Mr. Levy joined The Morgan Group in 2001. His responsibilities include arranging debt and equity financing, managing the property acquisition and disposition process, and oversight of all financial aspects of the firm and its projects. Prior to joining The Morgan Group, Mr. Levy spent 15 years with JPMorgan Chase, most recently, as Managing Director of Real Estate and Lodging Investment Banking for the Southern Region. In this capacity, he managed client activities in a variety of investment banking and financing transac tions. Mr. Levy graduated with honors from the University of Texas with a B.B.A. in Finance.

40

Paul B. Murphy Jr.  Mr. Murphy, an independent director since April 2008, currently serves as Chief Executive Officer of Amegy Bank of Texas (formerly known as Southwest Bank of Texas). Mr. Murphy began his banking career at Allied Bank of Texas in 1981 and joined Amegy Bank in 1990 as an Executive Vice President. With little more than $50 million in assets and one location 17 years ago, Amegy Bank now has more than $11 billion in assets, nearly 1,900 employees, and more than 85 banking centers throughout the greater Houston, Dallas and San Antonio metropolitan areas. Mr. Murphy became President in 1996 and CEO in 2000. He serves on the boards of the Houston Endowment, St. Luke’s Episcopal Health Care System, Greater Houston Community Foundation, Greater Houston Partnership and Children’s Museum of Houston. He received his bachelor degree in finance from Mississippi State University and his M.B.A. from the University of Texas at Austin.

Charles N. Hazen.  Mr. Hazen joined Hines in September 1989. Mr. Hazen has served as our President and as President of the general partner of our Advisor since August 2003 and is responsible for overall management of our business strategy and operations. Mr. Hazen has also been the President and Chief Executive Officer for Hines Global and the general partner of the advisor for Hines Global since December 2008. He also served as Chief Operating Officer for us and the general partner of the Advisor from August 2003 to April 1, 2008 when he became Chief Executive Officer for us and the general partner of our Advisor. He has also been a Senior Vice President of the general partner of Hines since July 2000, the President and a member of the management bo ard of the Core Fund since July 2004 and a director of our Dealer Manager since August 2003. During his tenure at Hines has participated in more than $9 billion of office, retail and industrial investments in the U.S. and abroad and managed Hines Corporate Properties, a $700 million fund that developed and acquired single-tenant office buildings in the U.S. Mr. Hazen graduated from the University of Kentucky with a B.S. in Finance and received his J.D. from the University of Kentucky.

Sherri W. Schugart.  Ms. Schugart joined Hines in 1995. She has served as our Chief Financial Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the general partner of our Advisor since August 2003 and as the Chief Financial Officer of the Core Fund since July 2004. In these roles, her responsibilities include oversight of our financial and portfolio management, equity and debt financing activities, investor relations, accounting, financial reporting, compliance and administrative functions. Ms. Schugart has also served as Chief Financial Officer for Hines Global and the general partner of the advisor for Hines Global since December 2008. She has also been a Senior Vice President of the general partner of Hines since October 2007 and has served as a director of our De aler Manager since August 2003. Ms. Schugart has been responsible for arranging more than $8.0 billion in equity and debt for Hines’ private investment funds. She was also previously the controller for several of Hines’ public and private investment funds and portfolios. Prior to joining Hines, Ms. Schugart spent eight years with Arthur Andersen, where she managed both public and private clients in the real estate, construction, finance and banking industries. She graduated from Southwest Texas State University with a B.B.A. in Accounting and is a certified public accountant.

Edmund A. Donaldson.  Mr. Donaldson joined Hines in 1994. Since April 2008, he has served as the Chief Investment Officer for us and the general partner of our Advisor. In these roles, he is responsible for management of our real estate acquisition program. Mr. Donaldson has also served as Chief Investment Officer for Hines Global and the general partner of the advisor for Hines Global since December 2008. He has also served as a Senior Vice President of the general partner of Hines since October 2004 and the Senior Investment Officer and member of the management board of the Core Fund since July 2004. He has been responsible for the acquisition of over $7 billion in assets for various Hines affiliates. He also has been instrumental in the investment and management of the combined capitalization of $825 million of the Hines 1997 U.S. Office Development Fund, L.P. and the Hines 1999 U.S. Office Development Fund, L.P. He was also responsible for the investment and management of Hines Suburban Office Venture, L.L.C. formed in January 2002 with a total capital commitment of $222 million. He graduated from the University of California, San Diego with a B.A. in Quantitative Economics and Decision Sciences and received his M.B.A. from Rice University.

Frank R. Apollo.  Mr. Apollo joined Hines in 1993. He currently serves as Senior Vice President — Finance; Treasurer, and Secretary for us and the general partner of our Advisor and as Senior Vice President — Finance of the Core Fund. He was elected to these positions in April 2008 and is responsible for overseeing portfolio financial management, debt financings, treasury and liquidity management, legal and corporate governance. He served as Chief Accounting Officer, Treasurer and Secretary for us since August 2003 and Chief Accounting Officer of the Core Fund since July 2004. His responsibilities in these positions included accounting, financial reporting, legal and corporate governance. Mr. Apollo has also served as Senior Vice Presiden t — Finance; Treasurer and Secretary for Hines Global and the general partner of the advisor for Hines Global since December 2008. He has also served as a Vice President of the general partner of Hines since 1999 and as the Vice President, Treasurer, and Secretary of our Dealer Manager since August 2003 and, as a result, is responsible for all financial operations of the Dealer Manager. Prior to holding these positions, Mr. Apollo served as the Vice President and Corporate Controller responsible for the accounting and control functions for Hines’ international operations, the Vice President and Regional Controller for Hines’ European Region and the director of Hines’ Internal Audit Department. Before joining Hines, Mr. Apollo was an audit manager with Arthur Andersen. He graduated from the University of Texas with a B.B.A. in Accounting, is a certified public accountant and holds Series 28 and 63 securities licenses.

41

Kevin L. McMeans.  Mr. McMeans joined Hines in 1992. Since April 2008, he has served as the Asset Management Officer of Hines REIT for us and the general partner of our Advisor. Mr. McMeans has also served as Asset Management Officer for Hines Global and the general partner of the advisor for Hines Global since December 2008. He has also served as the Asset Management Officer of the Core Fund since January 2005. In these roles, he is responsible for overseeing the management of the various investment properties owned by Hines REIT and the Core Fund. He previously served as the Chief Financial Officer of Hines Corporate Properties, an investment venture established by Hines with a major U.S. pension fund, from 2001 through June 2004. In this role, Mr.  ;McMeans was responsible for negotiating and closing in excess of $800 million of debt financings, underwriting and evaluating new investments, negotiating and closing sale transactions and overseeing the administrative and financial reporting requirements of the venture and its investors. Before joining Hines, Mr. McMeans spent four and a half years at Deloitte & Touche LLP in the Audit Department. He graduated from Texas A&M University with a B.S. in Computer Science and is a certified public accountant.

Ryan T. Sims.  Mr. Sims joined Hines in August 2003. On April 1, 2008, Mr. Sims was elected as the Chief Accounting Officer of Hines REIT, the general partner of our Advisor and the Core Fund. In these roles, he is responsible for management of Hines REIT’s accounting, financial reporting and SEC reporting functions, as well as oversight of the Company’s Sarbanes-Oxley compliance program. He is also responsible for establishing Hines REIT’s accounting policies and ensuring compliance with those policies. Mr. Sims has also served as Chief Accounting Officer for Hines Global and the general partner of the advisor for Hines Global since December 2008. He has also previously served as a Senior Controller for Hines REIT and the general p artner of our Advisor since August 2003 and the Core Fund since July 2004. In these roles, in addition to his responsibilities with respect to Hines REIT described above, Mr. Sims has had responsibility for managing the accounting and financial reporting for the Core Fund. Prior to joining Hines, Mr. Sims was a manager in the audit practice of Arthur Andersen, LLP and Deloitte & Touche LLP, serving clients primarily in the real estate industry. He holds a Bachelor of Business Administration degree in Accounting from Baylor University and is a certified public accountant.

Our Board of Directors

Our board of directors reviewed and unanimously ratified our charter and adopted our bylaws. Our charter and bylaws allow for a board of directors with no fewer than three directors and no more than ten directors, of which a majority must be independent directors. We currently have seven directors, four of whom are independent directors. Directors are elected annually by our shareholders, and there is no limit on the number of times a director may be elected to office. Each director serves until the next annual meeting of shareholders or (if longer) until his or her successor has been duly elected and qualifies.

Although the number of directors may be increased or decreased, subject to the limits of our charter, a decrease may not have the effect of shortening the term of any incumbent director. Any director may resign at any time and may be removed with or without cause by the shareholders upon the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all votes entitled to be cast at a meeting called for the purpose of the proposed removal. A vacancy created by the death, removal or resignation of a director may be filled by a majority vote of the remaining directors, or by a vote of shareholders as permitted by the Maryland General Corporation Law. If a vacancy is created by an increase in the number of directors, the vacancy will be filled by the board or by the affirmative vote of the holders of the outstanding common shares. Where possible, independ ent directors must nominate replacements for vacancies required to be filled by independent directors.

42

Our board of directors has determined that each of our independent directors is independent within the meaning of the applicable (i) provisions set forth in our charter, and (ii) requirements set forth in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and the applicable SEC rules, and (iii) although our shares are not listed on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”), independence rules set forth in the NYSE Listed Company Manual. Our board applied the NYSE rules governing independence as part of its policy of maintaining strong corporate governance practices.

An “independent director” is defined under our charter and means a person who is not, and within the last two years has not been, directly or indirectly associated with Hines or the Advisor by virtue of:

• ownership of an interest in Hines, the Advisor or their affiliates;

• employment by Hines or the Advisor or their affiliates;

• service as an officer, trust manager or director of Hines or the Advisor or their affiliates;

• performance of services for us, other than as a director;

• service as a director, trust manager or trustee of more than three real estate investment trusts advised by the Advisor or organized by Hines; or

• maintenance of a material business or professional relationship with Hines, the Advisor or any of their affiliates.

An independent director cannot be associated with us, Hines or the Advisor as set forth above either directly or indirectly. An indirect relationship includes circumstances in which a director’s spouse, parents, children, siblings, mothers- or fathers-in-law, sons- or daughters-in-law or brothers- or sisters-in-law, is or has been associated with us, Hines, the Advisor, or their affiliates. A business or professional relationship is considered material if the gross revenue derived by the director from the Advisor or Hines and their affiliates exceeds five percent of either the director’s annual gross revenue during either of the last two years or the director’s net worth on a fair market value basis. Independent directors may not accept, directly or indirectly, any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee from u s or any of our subsidiaries, other than in their capacity as members of our board of directors or any committee thereof.

To be considered independent under the NYSE rules, the board of directors must determine that a director does not have a material relationship with us and/or our consolidated subsidiaries (either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with any of those entities, including Hines and its affiliates). Under the NYSE rules, a director will not be independent if, within the last three years:

• the director was employed by us or Hines;

• an immediate family member of the director was employed by us or Hines as an executive officer;

• the director, or an immediate family member of the director, received more than $120,000 during any 12-month period in direct compensation from us or Hines, other than director and committee fees and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior service (provided such compensation is not contingent in any way on continued service);

• the director is a current partner or employee of a firm that is our or Hines’ internal or external auditor, the director has an immediate family member who is a current partner of such a firm, the director has an immediate family member who is a current employee of such a firm and personally works on our or Hines’ audit, or the director or an immediate family member was within the last three years a partner or employee of such a firm and personally worked on the listed company’s audit within that time;

43

• the director or an immediate family member is, or has been, employed as an executive officer of another company where any of our or Hines’ present executive officers at the same time serves or served on that company’s compensation committee; or

• the director was an executive officer or an employee (or an immediate family member of the director was an executive officer) of a company that makes payments to, or receives payments from, us or Hines for property or services in an amount which, in any single fiscal year, exceeded the greater of $1,000,000 or 2% of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues.

Our directors are accountable to us and our shareholders as fiduciaries. Generally speaking, this means that our directors must perform their duties in good faith and in a manner each director believes to be in the best interest of us and our shareholders. Our directors are not required to devote all or any specific amount of their time to our business. Our directors are only required to devote the time to our business as their duties require. We anticipate that our directors will meet at least quarterly or more frequently if necessary. In the exercise of their fiduciary responsibilities, we anticipate that our directors will rely heavily on the Advisor. Therefore, our directors will be dependent on the Advisor and information they receive from the Advisor in order to adequately perform their duties, including their obligation to overs ee and evaluate the Advisor and its affiliates. Please see “Risk Factors — Business and Real Estate Risks — Our success will be dependent on the performance of Hines as well as key employees of Hines” and “Risk Factors — Potential Conflicts of Interest Risks.”

In addition to the investment policies set forth in our charter and bylaws, our board of directors has approved written policies on investments and borrowing for us as described in this prospectus. The directors may establish further written policies on investments and borrowings and will monitor our administrative procedures, investment operations and performance to ensure that the policies are fulfilled and are in the best interest of the shareholders. We will follow the policies on investments and borrowings set forth in this prospectus unless and until they are modified by our board of directors following, if applicable, requirements set forth in our charter and bylaws.

Our independent directors are responsible for reviewing our fees and expenses on at least an annual basis and with sufficient frequency to determine that the expenses incurred are in the best interest of our shareholders. Our independent directors may determine from time to time during or after this offering to increase or decrease the fees and expenses payable to Hines, the Advisor and other Hines affiliates. The independent directors will also be responsible for reviewing the performance of the Advisor and determining that the compensation to be paid to the Advisor is reasonable in relation to the nature and quality of services performed and our investment performance and that the provisions of the Advisory Agreement are being carried out. Specifically, the independent directors will consider factors such as:

• our net assets and net income;

• the amount of the fees paid to the Advisor in relation to the size, composition and performance of our investments;

• the success of the Advisor in generating appropriate investment opportunities;

• rates charged to other REITs, especially REITs of similar structure and other investors by advisors performing similar services;

• additional revenues realized by the Advisor and its affiliates through their relationship with us, whether we pay them or they are paid by others with whom we do business;

• the quality and extent of service and advice furnished by the Advisor;

• the performance of our investment portfolio;

• the quality of our portfolio relative to the investments generated by the Advisor for its own account; and

44

• other factors related to managing a public company, such as shareholder services and support, compliance with securities laws, including Sarbanes-Oxley and other factors typical of a public company.

Our directors and their affiliates may not vote or consent to the voting of shares they now own or hereafter acquire on matters submitted to the shareholders regarding either the removal of the Advisor, any director and any of their affiliates, or any transaction between us and the Advisor, any director or any of their affiliates.

Committees of the Board of Directors

Our full board of directors generally considers all major decisions concerning our business. Our bylaws provide that our board may establish such committees as the board believes appropriate. The four standing committees of our board of directors are: the audit committee, the conflicts committee, the nominating and corporate governance committee and the compensation committee so that these important areas can be addressed in more depth than may be possible at a full board meeting and to also ensure that these areas are addressed by non-interested members of the board. The board of directors adopted a written charter for each of these committees. A copy of each charter is available on our website, www.HinesREIT.com. Our independent directors each serve on all of these committees. Mr. Hassard serves as chairman of the conflicts comm ittee. Mr. Levy serves as chairman of the audit committee. Mr. Davis serves as chairman of the nominating and corporate governance and compensation committees.

Audit Committee

Members of the audit committee are appointed by our board of directors to serve one-year terms or until their successors are duly elected and qualify, or until their earlier death, retirement, resignation or removal. The audit committee reviews the functions of our management and independent auditors pertaining to our financial statements and performs such other duties and functions deemed appropriate by the board. The audit committee is ultimately responsible for the selection, evaluation and replacement of our independent auditors. Our board of directors has determined that each member of our audit committee is independent within the meaning of the applicable requirements set forth in or promulgated under the Exchange Act, as well as in the rules of the NYSE. In addition, our board of directors has determined that Stanley D. Levy is an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of applicable rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Unless otherwise determined by the board of directors, no member of the committee may serve as a member of the audit committee of more than two other public companies.

Conflicts Committee

Members of the conflicts committee are appointed by our board of directors to serve one-year terms or until their successors are duly elected and qualify or until their earlier death, resignation, retirement or removal. The primary purpose of the conflicts committee is to review specific matters that the board believes may involve conflicts of interest and to determine if the resolution of the conflict of interest is fair and reasonable to us and our shareholders. However, we cannot assure you that this committee will successfully eliminate the conflicts of interest that will exist between us and Hines, or reduce the risks related thereto.

The conflicts committee reviews and approves specific matters that the board of directors believes may involve conflicts of interest to determine whether the resolution of the conflict of interest is fair and reasonable to us and our shareholders. The conflicts committee is responsible for reviewing and approving the terms of all transactions between us and Hines or its affiliates or any member of our board of directors, including (when applicable) the economic, structural and other terms of all acquisitions and dispositions and the annual renewal of the Advisory Agreement between us and the Advisor. The conflicts committee is responsible for reviewing the Advisor’s performance and the fees and expenses paid by us to the Advisor and any of its affiliates. The review of such fees and expenses is required to be performed with suffi cient frequency, but at least annually, to determine that the expenses incurred are in the best interest of our shareholders. For further discussion, please see the “Investment Objectives and Policies with Respect to Certain Activities — Affiliate Transaction Policy” section of this prospectus. The conflicts committee is also responsible for reviewing Hines’ performance as property manager of our directly owned properties.

45

Compensation Committee

Members of the compensation committee are appointed by our board of directors to serve one-year terms or until their successors are duly elected and qualify or until their earlier death, retirement, resignation or removal. The committee meets as called by the chairman of the committee, but not less frequently than annually. The primary purpose of the compensation committee is to oversee our compensation programs, including our Employee and Director Incentive Share Plan. The committee reviews the compensation and benefits paid by us to our directors and, in the event we hire employees, the compensation paid to our executive officers as well as any employment, severance and termination agreements or arrangements made with any executive officer and, if desired by our board of directors, produces an annual report to be included in our annu al proxy statement.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Members of the nominating and corporate governance committee are appointed by our board of directors to serve one-year terms or until their successors are duly elected and qualify or until their earlier death, retirement, resignation or removal. This committee:

• assists our board of directors in identifying individuals qualified to become members of our board of directors;

• recommends candidates to our board of directors to fill vacancies on the board;

• recommends committee assignments for directors to the full board;

• periodically assesses the performance of our board of directors;

• reviews and recommends appropriate corporate governance policies and procedures to our board of directors; and

• reviews and monitors our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Senior Officers and Directors, and any other corporate governance policies and procedures we may have from time to time.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During 2008, our compensation committee consisted of Messrs. Davis, Levy, Hassard and Murphy, our four independent directors. None of our executive officers served as a director or member of the compensation committee of an entity whose executive officers included a member of our compensation committee.

Compensation of Directors

Our compensation committee designs our director compensation with the goals of attracting and retaining highly qualified individuals to serve as independent directors and to fairly compensate them for their time and efforts. Because of our unique attributes as a REIT, service as an independent director on our board requires a substantial time commitment as well as broad expertise in the fields of real estate and real estate investment. The compensation committee balances these considerations with the principles that our director compensation program should be transparent and should align directors’ interests with those of our shareholders.

46

The following table sets forth information regarding compensation of our directors during 2008.

2008 Director Compensation

Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash		Stock  Awards(1)	Option Awards		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation		��	Change in Pension Value and Non- Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings		All Other Compensation		Total Compensation
G. Abbott Davis	$	63,320	1,000 shares		—		—			—		2,941	$	75,941
Thomas A. Hassard	$	70,680	1,000 shares		—		—			—		2,650	$	83,010
Stanley D. Levy	$	62,000	1,000 shares		—		—			—		2,599	$	74,279
Paul B. Murphy	$	36,500	1,353.5 shares		—		—			—		184	$	49,761
Jeffery C. Hines and   C. Hastings Johnson(2)		—	—		—		—			—		—		—

____________

(1)

Each of Messrs. Davis, Hassard and Levy received 1,000 restricted shares under our Employee and Director Incentive Share Plan upon his election to our board of directors in each of 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008. Mr. Murphy received 353.5 restricted shares under our incentive plan upon his election to our board of directors for a partial term on April 1,2008 and 1,000 shares under our incentive plan upon his reelection to our board of directors following our 2008 annual meeting.

(2)

Messrs. Baughn, Hines and Johnson, who are employees of Hines, receive no additional compensation for serving as Hines REIT directors. Mr. Murphy was elected to the board effective April 1, 2008 and therefore, received no compensation during 2007.

Under the terms of our Employee and Director Incentive Share Plan, each independent director elected or reelected to the board (whether through a shareholder meeting or by directors to fill a vacancy on the board) is granted 1,000 restricted shares on or about the date of election or reelection. These restricted shares will fully vest if the independent director completes the term or partial term for which he or she was elected. Messrs. Davis, Hassard and Levy each received 1,000 restricted shares under our incentive plan upon his election to our board of directors in each of 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008. Mr. Murphy received 353.5 restricted shares under our incentive plan upon his election to our board of directors for a partial term on April 1, 2008 and 1,000 shares under our incentive plan upon his reelection to our board of directors following our 2008 annual meeting.

We pay our independent directors an annual fee of $30,000, and a fee of $2,000 for each meeting of the board (or any committee thereof) attended in person. Pursuant to our Employee and Director Incentive Share Plan, in lieu of receiving his or her annual fee in cash, an independent director is entitled to receive the annual fee in the form of our common shares or a combination of common shares and cash. If a committee meeting is held on the same day as a meeting of the board, each independent director will receive $1,000 for each committee meeting attended in person on such day, subject to a maximum of $2,000 for all committee meetings attended in person on such day. We will also pay our independent directors a fee of $500 for each board or committee meeting attended via teleconference lasting one hour or less and $1,000 for board or c ommittee meetings attended via teleconference lasting more than one hour.

We pay the following annual retainers to the Chairpersons of our board committees:

• $7,500 to the Chairperson of our conflicts committee;

• $6,000 to the Chairperson of our audit committee;

• $3,000 to the Chairperson of our compensation committee; and

• $3,000 to the Chairperson of our nominating and corporate governance committee.

47

All directors are reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at board or committee meetings.

Employee and Director Incentive Share Plan

We adopted our Employee and Director Incentive Share Plan to:

• furnish incentives to individuals chosen to receive share-based awards because they are considered capable of improving our operations and increasing profits;

• encourage selected persons to accept or continue employment with the Advisor; and

• increase the interest of our officers and our independent directors in our welfare through their participation in the growth in the value of our common shares.

The Employee and Director Incentive Share Plan provides for the grant of awards to our full-time employees (in the event we ever have employees), full-time employees of our Advisor, full-time employees of entities that provide services to us, certain of our independent directors, directors of the Advisor or of entities that provide services to us, certain of our consultants and certain consultants to the Advisor or to entities that provide services to us. Such awards may consist of nonqualified stock options, incentive stock options, restricted shares, share appreciation rights, and dividend equivalent rights. Please see “Investment Objectives and Policies with Respect to Certain Activities — Investment Limitations” for a description of limitations imposed by our charter on our ability to issue options and warran ts under the Employee and Director Incentive Share Plan.

The total number of common shares reserved for issuance under the Employee and Director Incentive Share Plan is equal to 0.5% of our outstanding shares on a fully diluted basis at any time, not to exceed 10,000,000 shares. Our compensation committee has adopted a policy that prohibits awards of shares of common stock under the Employee and Director Incentive Share Plan except for issuances to our independent directors as compensation for serving as such. This policy may be revised or terminated at any time that our compensation committee believes that such action would be in the best interests of our shareholders.

Options entitle the holder to purchase common shares for a specified exercise price during a specified period. Under the Employee and Director Incentive Share Plan, we may grant options that are intended to be incentive stock options within the meaning of section 422 of the Code (“incentive stock options”) or options that are not incentive stock options (“nonqualified stock options”). Incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options will generally have an exercise price that is not less than 100% of the fair market value of the common shares underlying the option on the date of grant and will expire, with certain exceptions, 10 years after such date.

Restricted share awards entitle the recipient to common shares from us under terms that provide for vesting over a specified period of time. Such awards would typically be forfeited with respect to the unvested shares upon the termination of the recipient’s employment or other relationship with us. Restricted shares may not, in general, be sold or otherwise transferred until restrictions are removed and the shares have vested. Holders of restricted shares may receive cash dividends prior to the time that the restrictions on the restricted shares have lapsed. Any dividends payable in common shares shall be subject to the same restrictions as the underlying restricted shares.

Share appreciation rights entitle the recipient to receive from us at the time of exercise an amount in cash (or in some cases, common shares) equal to the excess of the fair market value of the common shares underlying the share appreciation right on the date of exercise over the price specified at the time of grant, which cannot be less than the fair market value of the common shares on the grant date.

Dividend equivalent rights entitle the recipient to receive, for a specified period, a payment equal to the quarterly dividend declared and paid by us on one common share. Dividend equivalent rights are forfeited to us upon the termination of the recipient’s employment or other relationship with us.

48

As indicated above, each individual who is elected or re-elected to the board as an independent director (whether through shareholder meeting or by directors to fill a vacancy on the board) will be granted 1,000 restricted shares on or about the date of election or re-election. These restricted shares will fully vest if the independent director completes the term or partial term for which he or she was elected. Although there is no present intention to increase the number of shares to be granted to independent directors in connection with their election or re-election, in the event the number of restricted shares to be granted is increased during this offering, any such increase will be limited such that no more than 2,500 restricted shares will be granted to any independent director with respect to each term or partial term such indep endent director serves.

Limited Liability and Indemnification of Directors, Officers, Employees and Other Agents

The Maryland General Corporation Law allows directors and officers to be indemnified against judgments, penalties, fines, settlements and expenses actually incurred in a proceeding unless the following can be established:

• an act or omission of the director or officer was material to the cause of action adjudicated in the proceeding, and was committed in bad faith or was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty;

• the director or officer actually received an improper personal benefit in money, property or services; or

• with respect to any criminal proceeding, the director or officer had reasonable cause to believe his act or omission was unlawful.

Indemnification could reduce the legal remedies available to us and our shareholders against the indemnified individuals. We also maintain a directors and officers liability insurance policy.

An indemnification provision does not reduce the exposure of our directors and officers to liability under federal or state securities laws, nor does it limit our shareholders’ ability to obtain injunctive relief or other equitable remedies for a violation of a director’s or an officer’s duties to us or our shareholders, although the equitable remedies may not be an effective remedy in some circumstances.

In spite of the above provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law, the charter and bylaws of Hines REIT provide that our directors and officers will be indemnified by us for losses arising from our operations only if all of the following conditions are met:

• the indemnified person determined, in good faith, that the course of conduct which caused the loss or liability was in our best interests;

• the indemnified person was acting on our behalf or performing services for us;

• in the case of non-independent directors and officers, the liability or loss was not the result of negligence or misconduct by the party seeking indemnification;

• in the case of independent directors, the liability or loss was not the result of gross negligence or willful misconduct by the party seeking indemnification; and

• the indemnification or agreement to hold harmless is recoverable only out of our net assets and not from our shareholders.

The Advisor and its affiliates will also be subject to the limitations on indemnification to which the non-independent directors and officers are subject, as described above.

The general effect to investors of any arrangement under which any of our directors or officers are insured or indemnified against liability is a potential reduction in dividends resulting from our payment of premiums associated with insurance or payments of a defense, settlement or claim. In addition, indemnification and provisions providing for the limitation of liability could reduce the legal remedies available to us and our shareholders against our officers and directors.

49

The Securities and Exchange Commission takes the position that indemnification against liabilities arising under the Securities Act is against public policy and unenforceable. Indemnification of our directors, officers, Hines or its affiliates will not be allowed for liabilities arising from or out of a violation of state or federal securities laws, unless one or more of the following conditions are met:

• there has been a successful adjudication on the merits of each count involving alleged securities law violations;

• such claims have been dismissed with prejudice on the merits by a court of competent jurisdiction; or

• a court of competent jurisdiction approves a settlement of the claims against the indemnitee and finds that indemnification of the settlement and the related costs should be made, and the court considering the request for indemnification has been advised of the position of the Securities and Exchange Commission and of the published position of any state securities regulatory authority in which the securities were offered or sold as to indemnification for violations of securities laws.

Our charter and bylaws provide that the advancement of funds to our directors and officers for legal expenses and other costs incurred as a result of any legal action for which indemnification is being sought is permissible only if all of the following conditions are satisfied:

• the legal action relates to acts or omissions with respect to the performance of duties or services on behalf of the Company;

• the legal action is initiated by a third party who is not a shareholder or the legal action is initiated by a shareholder acting in his or her capacity as such and a court of competent jurisdiction specifically approves such advancement; and

• the party seeking advancement undertakes to repay the advanced funds to the Company, together with the applicable legal rate of interest thereon, in cases in which such party is found not to be entitled to indemnification.

The Operating Partnership has agreed to indemnify and hold harmless the Advisor and Hines and their affiliates performing services for us from specific claims and liabilities arising out of the performance of their obligations under the Advisory Agreement and our Property Management and Leasing Agreements, subject to the limitations contained in such agreements. Please see “— The Advisor and the Advisory Agreement — Indemnification” and the “— Hines and our Property Management and Leasing Agreements — Our Property Management and Leasing Agreements — Indemnification” sections below. The Operating Partnership must also indemnify Hines REIT and its directors, officers and employees in Hines REIT’s capacity as its general partner. Please see “The Ope rating Partnership — Indemnity.”

We have entered into indemnification agreements with our officers and directors. These agreements provide our officers and directors with a contractual right to indemnification to substantially the same extent they enjoy mandatory indemnification under our charter and bylaws.

50

The Advisor and the Advisory Agreement

The following chart illustrates our general structure and our management relationship with Hines and its affiliates as of December 31, 2008:

51

Our Advisor is an affiliate of Hines. Its address is 2800 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 5000, Houston, Texas 77056-6118. All of our day-to-day operations are managed and performed by the Advisor and its affiliates. Certain of our directors and executive officers are also managers and executive officers of the Advisor. The following table sets forth information regarding the officers and managers of our Advisor, or our Advisor’s general partner. The biography of each of these officers and managers is set forth above.

Name	Age	Position and Office with the General Partner of the Advisor
Jeffrey C. Hines	53	Chairman of the Managers
C. Hastings Johnson	60	Manager
Charles M. Baughn	54	Manager
Charles N. Hazen	48	President and Chief Executive Officer
Sherri W. Schugart	43	Chief Financial Officer
Edmund A. Donaldson	39	Chief Investment Officer
Frank R. Apollo	42	Senior Vice President — Finance; Treasurer and Secretary
Kevin L. McMeans	44	Asset Management Officer
Ryan T. Sims	37	Chief Accounting Officer

Duties of Our Advisor

We do not have any employees. We entered into an Advisory Agreement with our Advisor. Pursuant to this agreement, which was unanimously approved by our board of directors, including our independent directors, we appointed the Advisor to manage, operate, direct and supervise our operations. In connection with managing our operations, the Advisor will face conflicts of interest. Please see “Risk Factors — Potential Conflicts of Interest Risks.” Therefore, the Advisor and its affiliates will perform our day-to-day operational and administrative services. The Advisor is subject to the supervision of our board of directors and provides only the services that are delegated to it. Our independent directors are responsible for reviewing the performance of the Advisor and determining that the compensation to be paid to th e Advisor is reasonable in relation to the nature and quality of services performed and that our investment objectives and the provisions of the Advisory Agreement are being carried out. The Advisor’s duties under the Advisory Agreement include, but are not limited to, the following:

Offering Services

• the development of this offering, including the determination of its specific terms;

• along with our Dealer Manager, the approval of the participating broker dealers and negotiation of the related selling agreements;

• preparation and approval of all marketing materials to be used by our Dealer Manager or others relating to this offering;

• along with our Dealer Manager, the negotiation and coordination with our transfer agent of the receipt, collection, processing and acceptance of subscription agreements, commissions, and other administrative support functions; and

• all other services related to this offering, whether performed and incurred by the Advisor or its affiliates.

Acquisition Services

• serve as our investment and financial advisor and provide relevant market research and economic and statistical data in connection with our assets and investment objectives and policies;

52

• subject to our investment objectives and policies: (i) locate, analyze and select potential investments; (ii) structure and negotiate the terms and conditions of investment transactions; (iii) acquire assets on our behalf; and (iv) arrange for financing related to acquisitions of assets;

• perform due diligence on prospective investments and create summarized due diligence reports;

• prepare reports regarding prospective investments which include recommendations and supporting documentation necessary for our board of directors to evaluate the proposed investments; and

• negotiate and execute approved investments and other transactions.

Asset Management Services

• investigate, select, and, on our behalf, engage and conduct business with such persons as the Advisor deems necessary to the proper performance of its obligations under the Advisory Agreement, including but not limited to consultants, accountants, lenders, technical advisors, attorneys, brokers, underwriters, corporate fiduciaries, escrow agents, depositaries, custodians, agents for collection, insurers, insurance agents, developers, construction companies and any and all persons acting in any other capacity deemed by the Advisor necessary or desirable for the performance of any of the foregoing services;

• negotiate and service our debt facilities and other financings;

• monitor and evaluate the performance of our investments; provide daily management services to the Company and perform and supervise the various management and operational functions related to the Company’s investments;

• coordinate with Hines on its duties under the Property Management and Leasing Agreement and assist in obtaining all necessary approvals of major property transactions as governed by such agreement;

• coordinate and manage relationships between the Company and any joint venture partners;

• consult with our officers and board of directors and provide assistance with the evaluation and approval of potential property dispositions, sales or refinancings;

• provide or arrange for administrative services and items, legal and other services, office space, office furnishings, personnel and other overhead items necessary and incidental to the Company’s business and operations;

• provide financial and operational planning services and investment portfolio management functions;

• maintain accounting data and any other information requested concerning the activities of the Company as shall be required to prepare and to file all periodic financial reports and returns required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and any other regulatory agency, including annual financial statements;

• perform all reporting, record keeping, internal controls and similar matters in a manner to allow the Company to comply with applicable laws, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act; and

• perform tax and compliance services, cash management services and risk management services.

Shareholder Services

• manage communications with our shareholders, including answering phone calls, preparing and sending written and electronic reports and other communications; and

• establish technology infrastructure to assist in providing shareholder support and service.

Term of the Advisory Agreement

The current term of the Advisory Agreement ends in July 2009, and the Advisory Agreement may be renewed for an unlimited number of successive one-year periods upon the mutual consent of the parties. Renewals of the agreement must be approved by a majority of our independent directors. Additionally, the Advisory Agreement may be terminated:

53

• immediately by us (i) in the event the Advisor commits fraud, criminal conduct, willful misconduct or negligent breach of fiduciary duty by the Advisor, (ii) upon the bankruptcy of the Advisor or its involvement in similar insolvency proceedings or (iii) in the event of a material breach of the Advisory Agreement by the Advisor, which remains uncured after 10 days’ written notice;

• without cause by a majority of our independent directors or by the Advisor upon 60 days’ written notice; or

• immediately by the Advisor upon our bankruptcy or involvement in similar insolvency proceedings or any material breach of the Advisory Agreement by us, which remains uncured after 10 days’ written notice.

For more information regarding a decision by our board of directors to terminate (or elect not to renew) the Advisory Agreement, please see “— Removal of the Advisor,” “The Operating Partnership — Repurchase of OP Units and/or the Participation Interest held by Hines and its Affiliates if Hines or its Affiliates Cease to be Our Advisor” and “Risk Factors — Investment Risks — Hines’ ability to cause the Operating Partnership to purchase the Participation Interest and any OP Units it and its affiliates hold in connection with the termination of the Advisory Agreement may deter us from terminating the Advisory Agreement.” In the event that a new advisor is retained, the Advisor will cooperate with us and our board of directors in effecting an o rderly transition of the advisory functions. The board of directors (including a majority of our independent directors) will approve a successor advisor only upon a determination that the new advisor possesses sufficient qualifications to perform the advisory functions for us and that the compensation to be received by the new advisor pursuant to the new advisory agreement is justified. The Advisory Agreement also provides that in the event the Advisory Agreement is terminated, we will promptly change our name and cease doing business under or using the name “Hines” (or any derivative thereof), upon the written request of Hines.

Compensation

The Advisor and its affiliates will receive certain compensation and be reimbursed for certain expenses and receive certain other payments in connection with services provided to us. The compensation, expense reimbursements and other payments payable to the Advisor and its affiliates may increase or decrease during or after this offering. Please see “Management Compensation, Expense Reimbursements and Operating Partnership Participation Interest” for a description of these matters. In the event the Advisory Agreement is terminated, the Advisor will be paid all earned, accrued and unpaid compensation and expense reimbursements within 30 days. Please see “— Removal of the Advisor” and “The Operating Partnership — Repurchase of OP Units and/or the Participation Interest held by Hines and its affiliates if Hines or its Affiliates Cease to be Our Advisor” for information regarding additional payments the Company may be required to make to our Advisor and other affiliates of Hines in connection with the termination of the Advisory Agreement.

The Advisor will pay for all organization and offering expenses, other than selling commissions and the dealer manager fee, whether incurred by us directly or through the Advisor, the Dealer Manager and/or their affiliates, which expenses are expected to consist of, among other expenses, actual legal, accounting, printing, filing fees, transfer agent costs and other offering-related expenses. Organization and offering expenses may also include, but are not limited to: (i) salaries, discretionary bonuses, benefits and other expenses of employees of our Dealer Manager while participating in the offering and marketing of our shares and in connection with their wholesaling activities; (ii) costs and expenses related to participating in broker-dealer sponsored events or hosting meetings with participating broker-dealers; (iii) 0;costs and expenses of conducting educational conferences and seminars; (iv) travel, lodging, entertainment and other expenses related to the offering and marketing of our shares; (v) advertising and marketing expenses, including the cost of promotional items; (vi) costs and expenses of conducting internal sales training and seminars and (vii) legal expenses of the Dealer Manager. We will have no liability for such expenses.

54

We will reimburse the Advisor for all of the costs it incurs in connection with the other services it provides to us unrelated to the offering, including, but not limited to:

• acquisition expenses incurred in connection with the selection and acquisition of assets including such expenses incurred related to assets pursued or considered but not ultimately acquired by us;

• the actual out-of-pocket cost of goods and services used by the Company and obtained from entities not affiliated with the Advisor, including brokerage fees paid in connection with the purchase and sale of our assets;

• taxes and assessments on income or assets and taxes as an expense of doing business and any other taxes otherwise imposed on the Company and its business or income;

• out-of-pocket costs associated with insurance required in connection with the business of the Company or by our officers and directors;

• all out-of-pocket expenses in connection with payments to our board of directors and meetings of our board of directors and shareholders;

• personnel and related employment direct costs and overhead of the Advisor and its affiliates in performing shareholder services for existing shareholders such as (1) managing communications with shareholders, including answering phone calls, preparing and sending written and electronic reports and other communications, and (2) establishing reasonable technology infrastructure to assist in providing shareholder support and service;

• out-of-pocket expenses of maintaining communications with shareholders, including the cost of preparation, printing, and mailing annual reports and other shareholder reports, proxy statements and other reports required by governmental entities;

• audit, accounting and legal fees, tax services, fees related to compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and other fees for professional services relating to the operations of the Company and all such fees incurred at the request of, or on behalf of, our independent directors or any committee of our board of directors;

• out-of-pocket costs for the Company to comply with all applicable laws, regulation and ordinances; and

• all other out-of-pocket costs necessary for the operation of the Company and its assets incurred by the Advisor in performing its duties under the Advisory Agreement.

Except as provided above, the expenses and payments subject to reimbursement by the Company do not include personnel and related direct employment or overhead costs of the Advisor or its affiliates, unless such costs are approved by a majority of our independent directors. For example, our independent directors have approved reimbursement for personnel and overhead costs of the Advisor in providing in-house legal services to the Company. If (1) we request that the Advisor perform services that are outside of the scope of the Advisory Agreement or (2) there are changes to the regulatory environment in which the Advisor or Company operates that would increase significantly the level of services performed by the Advisor, such that the costs and expenses borne by the Advisor for which it is not entitled to separate reimbursement for personnel and related employment direct costs and overhead under the Advisory Agreement would increase significantly, such services will be separately compensated at rates and in amounts as are agreed to by the Advisor and our independent directors, subject to the limitations contained in our charter.

Reimbursements by the Advisor

The Advisor must reimburse us quarterly for any amounts by which Operating Expenses (as defined below) exceed, in any four consecutive fiscal quarters, the greater of (i) 2% of our average invested assets, which consists of the average book value of our real estate properties, both equity interests in and loans secured by real estate, before reserves for depreciation or bad debts or other similar non-cash reserves, or (ii) 25% of our net income, which is defined as our total revenues applicable to any given period, less the expenses applicable to such period (excluding additions to depreciation, bad debt or similar non-cash reserves), unless our independent directors determine that such excess was justified.

55

Operating Expenses is defined as generally including all expenses paid or incurred by us as determined by U.S. GAAP, except certain expenses identified in our charter which include:

• expenses of raising capital such as organizational and offering expenses, legal, audit, accounting, underwriting, brokerage, listing, registration and other fees, printing and other such expenses and taxes incurred in connection with the issuance, distribution, transfer, registration and stock exchange listing of our shares;

• interest payments, taxes and non-cash expenditures such as depreciation, amortization and bad debt reserves;

• amounts paid as partnership distributions by our Operating Partnership; and

• all fees and expenses associated or paid in connection with the acquisition, disposition and ownership of assets (such as real estate commissions, acquisition fees, costs of foreclosure, insurance premiums, legal services, maintenance, repair or improvement of property, etc.).

The Advisor must reimburse the excess expenses to us within 60 days after the end of each fiscal quarter unless the independent directors determine that the excess expenses were justified based on unusual and nonrecurring factors which they deem sufficient. Within 60 days after the end of any of our fiscal quarters for which total operating expenses for the 12 months then ended exceed the limitation but were nevertheless paid, we will send to our shareholders a written disclosure, together with an explanation of the factors the independent directors considered in arriving at the conclusion that the excess expenses were justified.

Our independent directors must review from time to time but at least annually the performance of, and compensation paid to, the Advisor. Specifically, the independent directors must consider factors such as:

• our net assets and net income;

• the amount of the fees paid to the Advisor in relation to the size, composition and performance of our investments;

• the success of the Advisor in generating appropriate investment opportunities;

• rates charged to other REITs, especially REITs of similar structure and other investors by advisors performing similar services;

• additional revenues realized by the Advisor and its affiliates through their relationship with us, whether we pay them or they are paid by others with whom we do business;

• the quality and extent of service and advice furnished by the Advisor;

• the performance of our investment portfolio;

• the quality of our portfolio relative to the investments generated by the Advisor for its own account; and

• other factors related to managing a public company, such as shareholder services and support, compliance with securities laws, including Sarbanes-Oxley and other factors typical of a public company.

The Advisor has the right to assign the Advisory Agreement to an affiliate of Hines subject to approval by our independent directors. We cannot assign the Advisory Agreement without the consent of the Advisor.

Indemnification

The Operating Partnership has agreed to indemnify and hold harmless the Advisor and its affiliates, including their respective officers, directors, partners and employees, from all liability, claims, damages or losses arising in the performance of their duties hereunder, and related expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, to the extent such liability, claim, damage or loss and related expense is not fully reimbursed by insurance, subject to any limitations imposed by the laws of the State of Texas or contained in our charter or the partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership, provided that: (i) the Advisor and its affiliates have determined that the cause of conduct which caused the loss or liability was in our best interests, (ii) the Advisor and its affiliates were acting on behalf of or performing serv ices for us, and (iii) the indemnified claim was not the result of negligence, misconduct, or fraud of the Advisor or resulted from a breach of the agreement by the Advisor.

56

Any indemnification made to the Advisor may be made only out of our net assets and not from our shareholders. The Advisor will indemnify and hold us harmless from contract or other liability, claims, damages, taxes or losses and related expenses, including attorneys’ fees, to the extent that such liability, claim, damage, tax or loss and related expense is not fully reimbursed by insurance and is incurred by reason of the Advisor’s bad faith, fraud, willful misconduct or reckless disregard of its duties, but the Advisor shall not be held responsible for any action of our board of directors in following or declining to follow any advice or recommendation given by the Advisor.

Removal of the Advisor

In the event the Advisory Agreement expires without the consent of the Advisor, or is terminated for any reason other than by the Advisor, any partner in the Operating Partnership affiliated with Hines may require that the Operating Partnership acquire all or a portion of the Participation Interest or any OP Units held by any such holder. The purchase price for the Participation Interest will equal the amount that would be distributed to the holder assuming all the Operating Partnership’s assets were sold for their then-current fair market value and the proceeds were distributed in an orderly liquidation of the Operating Partnership. The purchase price for any OP Units will also be based on the then-current net asset value of the assets of the Operating Partnership. In such event, the purchase price is required to be pa id in cash or common shares, at the option of the holder. Please see “Risk Factors — Investment Risks — The redemption of interests in the Operating Partnership held by Hines and its affiliates (including the Participation Interest) as required in our Advisory Agreement may discourage a takeover attempt if our Advisory Agreement would be terminated in connection therewith.” The Operating Partnership must purchase any such interests within 120 days after the applicable holder gives the Operating Partnership written notice of its desire to sell all or a portion of the OP Units or Participation Interest (as applicable) held by such holder.

Hines and Our Property Management and Leasing Agreements

Hines or an affiliate of Hines manages many of our properties, as well as all of the properties owned by the Core Fund. We expect that Hines or an affiliate of Hines will manage most of the properties we and the Core Fund acquire in the future.

The Hines Organization

General

Hines is a fully integrated real estate investment and management firm which, with its predecessor, has been investing in real estate assets and providing acquisition, development, financing, property management, leasing or disposition services for over 50 years. The predecessor to Hines was founded by Gerald D. Hines in 1957 and Hines is currently owned by Gerald D. Hines and his son Jeffrey C. Hines. Hines’ investment partners have primarily consisted of large domestic and foreign institutional investors and high net worth individuals. Hines has worked with notable architects such as Philip Johnson; Cesar Pelli; I. M. Pei; Skidmore, Owings and Merrill and Frank Gehry, in the history of its operations. Please see “Hines, History, Experience and Timeline” included as Appendix D for additional information abo ut the history of Hines.

Hines is headquartered in Houston and currently has regional offices located in New York, Chicago, Atlanta, Houston, San Francisco, London, Mexico City, São Paulo, and Beijing. Each regional office operates as an independent business unit headed by an executive vice president who manages the day-to-day business of such region and participates in its financial results. All of these executive vice presidents, whose average tenure at Hines is 29 years, serve on the Hines Executive Committee which directs the strategy and management of Hines.

57

Hines’ central resources are located in Houston and these resources support the acquisition, development, financing, property management, leasing and disposition activities of all of the Hines regional offices. Hines’ central resources include employees with experience in capital markets and finance, accounting and audit, marketing, human resources, risk management, property management, leasing, asset management, project design and construction, operations and engineering. These resource groups are an important control point for maintaining performance standards and operating consistency for the entire firm. Please see “Risk Factors — Business and Real Estate Risks — Our success will be dependent on the performance of Hines as well as key employees of Hines.”

From inception through December 31, 2008, Hines, its predecessor and their respective affiliates have acquired or developed more than 867 real estate projects representing approximately 274 million square feet. In connection with these projects, Hines has employed many real estate investment strategies, including acquisitions, development, redevelopment and repositioning in the United States and internationally. As of December 31, 2008, the portfolio of Hines and its affiliates consisted of 238 projects valued at approximately $25.8 billion. This portfolio is owned by Hines, its affiliates and numerous third-party investors, including pension plans, domestic and foreign institutional investors, high net worth individuals and retail investors. Included in this portfolio are approximately 162 properties managed b y Hines, representing approximately 67.1 million square feet. In addition, Hines manages a portfolio of approximately 137 properties with about 54.1 million square feet owned by third parties in which Hines has no ownership interest. The total square feet Hines manages is approximately 121.2 million square feet located in 68 cities in the United States and 16 foreign countries.

The following table sets forth the history of the number of square feet under Hines’ management:

Commercial Real Estate Managed by Hines and its Affiliates

 

Hines also has extensive experience in disposition services. From 1992 through December 31, 2008, Hines has been involved in the disposition of 159 properties in the United States representing 63.2 million square feet valued at sales prices of $13.8 billion, and 46 properties outside of the United States representing 14.1 million square feet valued at sales prices of approximately $4.4 billion.

58

The following chart sets forth the Hines organizational structure and the number of people working in each region, the international offices and the central office as of December 31, 2008:

The following is information about the executive officers of the general partner of Hines and members of its Executive Committee:

Name	Age		Number of Years with Hines		Position
Gerald D. Hines		83		52	Chairman of the Board
Jeffrey C. Hines		53		27	President and Chief Executive Officer
C. Hastings Johnson		60		31	Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer
Charles M. Baughn		54		24	Executive Vice President and CEO — Capital Markets Group
James C. Buie, Jr.		56		28	Executive Vice President and CEO — West Region and Asia Pacific
Kenneth W. Hubbard		66		35	Executive Vice President and CEO — East Region
Christopher D. Hughes		47		22	Executive Vice President and CEO — East Region
E. Staman Ogilvie		59		35	Executive Vice President and CEO — Eurasia Region
C. Kevin Shannahan		53		26	Executive Vice President and CEO — Midwest, Southeast Region and South America
Mark A. Cover		49		25	Executive Vice President and CEO — Southwest Region and Mexico/Central America
Michael J.G. Topham		61		33	Executive Vice President and CEO — Hines Europe and Middle East/North Africa

Jeffrey C. Hines, C. Hastings Johnson and Charles M. Baughn are on our board of directors. Their biographies are included above with the rest of our management.

59

Gerald D. Hines.  Mr. Hines is the co-owner and Chairman of the Board of the general partner of Hines, and is responsible for directing all firm policy and procedures as well as participating in major new business ventures and cultivating new and existing investor relations. He is also Chairman of Hines’s Executive Committee. He oversees a portfolio of 238 projects valued at approximately $25.8 billion and has expanded the scope of Hines by moving into foreign markets, introducing new product lines, initiating acquisition programs and developing major new sources of equity and debt financings. He graduated from Purdue University with a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering and received an Honorary Doctorate of Engineering from Purdue.

James C. Buie, Jr.  Mr. Buie is an Executive Vice President of the general partner of Hines and CEO of the West Coast region of the United States and Hines Asia. He is responsible for all development and operations in these regions, representing a cumulative total of more than 27 million square feet of real estate. He is also a member of Hines’ Executive Committee. He graduated from the University of Virginia with a B.A. in Economics and received his M.B.A. from Stanford University.

Kenneth W. Hubbard.  Mr. Hubbard joined Hines in 1974. Mr. Hubbard was previously regional profit center officer responsible for all development, operations and transactions in the East region of the United States, representing a cumulative total of more than 36 million square feet of real estate. Effective January 2009, Mr. Hubbard is no longer involved in the day-to-day responsibilities of the East Region but continues to participate in company initiatives and special projects and maintains an office at the East Region headquarters in New York. He graduated from Duke University with a B.A. in History and received his J. D. from Georgetown Law School.

Christopher D. Hughes.  Mr. Hughes is an Executive Vice President of the general partner of Hines and CEO of the East region of the United States. He is responsible for all development and operations in this region. He is also a member of Hines’ Capital Markets Group having raised approximately $11.7 billion in committed equity since 2001. He is responsible for structuring commingled funds and raising equity capital for Hines projects globally. Mr. Hughes was a development officer in the Washington, DC office, where he contributed to the development and acquisition of more than 3.6 million square feet of office space. He graduated from Southern Methodist University with a B.A. in History. Mr. Hughes is also a director of the Dealer Manager and holds Series 22 and 63 licenses.

E. Staman Ogilvie.  Mr. Ogilvie is an Executive Vice President of the general partner of Hines and CEO of the Eurasia region. He is responsible for all development and operations of this region, which encompasses Russia and the former Soviet Union, Central and Eastern Europe, Turkey and India. He is a member of Hines’ Executive Committee and former co-head of Hines’ Southwest Region. Mr. Ogilvie has been responsible for the development, acquisition, and management of more than 29 million square feet of commercial real estate as well as several thousand acres of planned community development. He also has extensive experience in strategic planning and finance. He graduated from Washington and Lee University with a B. S. in Business Administ ration and received his M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.

C. Kevin Shannahan.  Mr. Shannahan is an Executive Vice President of the general partner of Hines and CEO of the Midwest and Southeast regions of the United States. He is responsible for all development and operations in these regions as well as new activities throughout South America and Canada (excluding Vancouver), representing a cumulative total of more than 70 million square feet of real estate and 5,000 acres of land development. He is also a member of Hines’ Executive Committee. He graduated from Cornell University with a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering and received his M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.

Mark A. Cover.  Mr. Cover is an Executive Vice President of the general partner of Hines and CEO of the Southwest region. He is responsible for all development and operations in the Southwest region of the United States and Mexico representing a total of more than 20 million square feet of real estate. He is also a member of Hines’ Executive Committee. He graduated from Bob Jones University with a B. S in Accounting and is a certificated public accountant (retired).

Michael J.G. Topham.  Mr. Topham is an Executive Vice President of the general partner of Hines and CEO of the European region and Hines Middle East/North Africa. He is responsible for all development, acquisitions, operations and real estate services in Europe, the United Kingdom and the Middle East, including the establishment of offices in seven countries. He is also a member of Hines’ Executive Committee. He was responsible for the establishment and management of Hines’ U.S. Midwest Region in 1985 and the development, acquisition and operations of more than 15 million square feet of real estate in that region. Between 1977 and 1984, he was also responsible as project officer of major buildings in Houston, Denver, and Minneapolis. He gradua ted from Exeter University with a B.A. in Economics and received his M.B.A. from the University of California at Berkeley.

60

Hines’ Real Estate Personnel and Structure

Hines is one of the largest and most experienced privately owned real estate investment, acquisition, development and management companies in the world. As of December 31, 2008, Hines and its affiliates had approximately 3,750 employees (including approximately 1,300 employees outside of the United States) who work out of Hines’ offices located in 68 cities in the United States and in 16 foreign countries, as shown in the map below.

 

Hines believes that it has mitigated many of the risks inherent in real estate investments by hiring, training and retaining what it believes to be highly-qualified management personnel and by rewarding these employees with performance-based compensation. Hines believes that the stability of its organization and its ability to retain its employees is demonstrated by the longevity of their tenure at Hines, as shown in the table below. Hines maintains what it believes are high performance and professional standards and rewards its personnel for their achievements. Typically, incentive compensation is provided to senior officers, as well as other key employees, in the form of profit sharing programs tied to Hines’ profitability related to each project, investment fund, geographic area, or the firm as a whole. In addition, for assets or groups of assets within the scope of their responsibilities, Hines’ senior officers typically hold equity investments (by way of participation in the interests held by Hines and its affiliates) in properties acquired or developed by Hines, its affiliates and investment partners. Hines believes this performance-based compensation provides better alignment of interests between Hines’ employees, Hines and its investors, while providing Hines’ employees with long-term incentives. However, there is no guarantee that Hines will be able to retain these employees in the future. The loss of a number of key employees could adversely impact our performance. Please see “Risk Factors — Business and Real Estate Risks — Our success will be dependent on the performance of Hines and its affiliates as well as key employees of Hines.”

61

	(As of December 31, 2008)
Title	Number of Employees		Average Tenure (Years)
Executive Vice President		8		29
Senior Vice President		47		21
Vice President		146		14
Manager		1196		6

Hines has employed a decentralized structure and built an international organization with professionals located in major office markets because it believes that knowledge of local market economics and demographic conditions is essential to the success of any real estate asset. Having real estate professionals living and working in most major markets where Hines invests allows Hines to monitor current local conditions and transactions and build relationships with local tenants, brokers and real estate owners. Hines believes that this decentralized structure allows them to better identify potential investment opportunities, perform more effective research of local markets and manage, lease and operate each real estate asset. However, Hines’ decentralized structure may or may not have a positive impact on our performance.

Hines’ Leasing and Property Management

Hines and its affiliates have extensive experience in providing responsive and professional property management and leasing services. Property management and leasing services provided by Hines include the following:

• Tenant relations;

• Energy management;

• Preventive maintenance;

• Security;

• Vendor contracting;

• Parking management;

• Marketing plans;

• Broker relations;

• Tenant prospecting; and

• Lease negotiation.

Hines believes that providing these services in a high quality and professional manner is integral to tenant satisfaction and retention.

Hines has been repeatedly recognized as an industry leader in property management and leasing. In 2001, 2002 and 2003, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) named Hines as “Energy Star” Partner of the year. An Energy Star label is a designation by the EPA for buildings that it believes show excellence in energy performance, reduced operating costs and environmental leadership. In 2004 and 2009, the EPA recognized Hines with its Sustained Excellence Award in recognition of the firm’s continued leadership in superior energy management. Hines has owned or managed 172 buildings, with more than 90 million square feet, which have received an “Energy Star” label. As of December 31, 2008, Hines has 130 of these buildings, with approximately 75 million square feet, un der current management. Hines has received more than 80 awards for buildings it has owned and/or managed from the Building Owners and Managers Association including “Building of the Year,” “New Construction of the Year,” “Commercial Recycler of the Year” and “Renovated Building of the Year” in local, regional, national and international competitions.

62

Hines believes that real estate is essentially a local business and that it is often a competitive advantage for Hines to have real estate professionals living and working in the local markets in which Hines and its affiliates own properties. This allows Hines’ real estate professionals to obtain local market knowledge and expertise and to maintain significant local relationships. As a result, Hines may have access to off-market acquisitions involving properties that are not yet being generally marketed for sale, which can alleviate competitive bidding and potentially higher costs for properties in certain cases. In addition, in part, as a result of Hines’ strong local presence in the markets it serves and its corporate culture, we believe Hines has a strong track record in attracting and retaining tenants.

Hines believes that tenant retention is a critical component of profitable building operations and results in lower volatility. Tenant loss can reduce operating income by decreasing rental revenue and operating expense recoveries and by exposing the property to market-driven rental concessions that may be required to attract replacement tenants. In addition, a property with high tenant turn-over may incur costs of leasing brokerage commissions and construction costs of tenant improvements required by new occupants of the vacant space.

Hines attempts to manage tenant occupancy proactively by anticipating and meeting tenant needs. In addition, Hines attempts to maintain productive relationships with leasing brokers in most major markets in the U.S. and as of December 31, 2008 maintains ongoing direct relationships with more than 3,000 tenants as the manager of buildings for its own account and as a third-party manager. Hines also has a substantial number of relationships with corporate and financial users of office space as well as with law firms, accounting and consulting firms in multiple locations throughout the United States and, increasingly, in a range of global locations.

The following table reflects the average leasing levels of stabilized properties managed by Hines over the past 10 years, as compared to the national average of U.S. office buildings as reported by the National Council of Real Estate Investment Fiduciaries (NCREIF):

 

Our Property Management and Leasing Agreements

The Operating Partnership has entered into a property management and leasing agreement with Hines, or affiliates of Hines, for each of the properties we own directly, under substantially the same terms as contained in our form of Property Management and Leasing Agreement summarized below, which was unanimously approved by our board of directors, including the independent directors. We expect to enter into similar agreements in connection with properties we will acquire and own directly in the future. Pursuant to these agreements, we have appointed and expect to appoint Hines to provide services in connection with the rental, leasing, operation and management of most, if not all, of our properties under the terms provided in the form Property Management and Leasing Agreement. To the extent we own interests in properties indirectly through entities or joint ventures, the Property Management and Leasing Agreements in place for properties owned by such entities or joint ventures, including agreements with Hines, may differ in material respects from our form agreement. The Core Fund has retained Hines to manage the properties it has acquired to date, and we expect the Core Fund will enter into similar agreements for properties it acquires in the future.

63

Hines may subcontract part or all of the required property management and leasing services but will remain ultimately responsible for services set forth in the Property Management and Leasing Agreement. Hines may form additional property management companies as necessary to manage the properties we acquire and may approve of the change of management of a property from one manager to another. Also, we may retain a third-party to perform certain property management and leasing functions. For example, we currently retain third party leasing agents at some of our properties.

Many of the services performed by Hines as property manager are summarized below. This summary is provided to illustrate the material functions that Hines will perform for us as our property manager, and it is not intended to include all of the services that may be provided to us by Hines or by third parties. Under each Property Management and Leasing Agreement, Hines, either directly or indirectly by engaging an affiliate or a third party, may:

• manage, operate and maintain each premises in a manner normally associated with the management and operation of a quality building;

• prepare and submit to us a proposed operating budget, capital budget, marketing program and leasing guidelines for each property for the management, leasing, and operation of each property for the forthcoming calendar year;

• collect all rents and other charges;

• perform construction management services in connection with the construction of leasehold improvements or redevelopment;

• be primarily responsible for the leasing activities of each property or supervise any third party we retain directly to provide such leasing activities; and

• enter into various agreements with sub-contractors for the operational activities of each property.

Compensation under the Property Management and Leasing Agreement

For properties we acquire and own directly, we pay Hines a management fee equal to the lesser of (i) 2.5% of the annual gross revenues received from the property or (ii) the amount of property management fees recoverable from tenants of the property under their leases, subject to a minimum of 1% of the annual gross revenues in the case of single-tenant properties. If we retain Hines as our primary leasing agent, we will pay Hines a leasing fee of 1.5% of gross rentals payable over the term of each executed lease including any lease amendment, renewal, extension, expansion or similar event. Leasing fees are payable regardless of whether an outside broker was used in connection with the transaction. Leasing fees are paid 50% at the time the lease or amendment is executed and the balance on the earlier of when the tenant takes o ccupancy subject to such lease or amendment or the date the tenant commences the payment of rent; or with respect to a renewal, extension, expansion or similar term - the date such term begins. If the property manager provides construction management services for leasehold improvements, we pay the property manager the amount payable by the tenant under its lease or, if payable by the landlord, direct costs incurred by the property manager for services provided by off-site employees. If the property manager provides re-development construction management services, the property manager is paid 2.5% of total project costs relating to the redevelopment, plus direct costs incurred by Hines in connection with providing the related services. Property management fees and leasing fees for international acquisitions may differ from our typical property management fees and leasing fees due to differences in international markets, but in all events the fees shall be paid in compliance with our charter and shall be appro ved by our independent directors.

We also generally reimburse Hines for its operating costs incurred in providing property management and leasing services. Included in this reimbursement of operating costs are the cost of personnel and overhead expenses related to such personnel who are located in Hines’ headquarters and regional offices, to the extent the same relate to or support the performance of Hines’s duties under the management agreement. Examples of such support include risk management, regional and central accounting, cash and systems management, human resources and payroll, technology and internal audit.

64

Term of the Property Management and Leasing Agreement

The Operating Partnership is party to a separate Property Management and Leasing Agreement for each property we own directly, each with an initial term of ten years from the date of each agreement. Thereafter, the term of each agreement will continue from year to year unless written notice of termination is given at least 90 days prior to any anniversary of the commencement of the term of the agreement. A majority of our independent directors must approve the continuance of the agreement.

Either Hines or we may terminate an agreement upon 30 days’ prior written notice in the event that (i) we sell the property to a third-party that is unaffiliated with us in a bona fide transaction, (ii) the property is substantially destroyed or condemned, where such destruction cannot be restored within one year after the casualty, or (iii) an affiliate of Hines is no longer our advisor. In addition, we may terminate the applicable Property Management and Leasing Agreement if Hines commits a material breach and such breach continues for 30 days after written notice from us (plus, with respect to breaches which Hines commences diligent efforts to cure within such period, but which cannot reasonably be cured within 30 days, such additional period not to exceed 90 days as is reasonably necessary t o cure such breach).

Every year, Hines will complete and deliver to us a written performance review, the scope and substance of which will be agreed to by Hines and us prior to the delivery of the first such performance review of the management of each property subject to a Property Management and Leasing Agreement. If we identify any material operating or performance deficiencies that are within the reasonable control of Hines after reviewing the performance review, we may give Hines written notice of such deficiencies. Hines will then have the later of 30 days, or such time as is reasonably necessary, to cure the deficiencies we identified. If such deficiencies are not corrected within this time period, we then may give Hines notice of our desire to terminate the applicable Property Management and Leasing Agreement. If Hines does not cure such defic iencies within 30 days of the second notice, and provide written notice to us that such deficiencies have been cured, we may then terminate the applicable Property Management and Leasing Agreement.

Indemnification

The Operating Partnership has agreed to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Hines and its officers, agents and employees from and against any and all causes of action, claims, losses, costs, expenses, liabilities, damages or injuries (including legal fees and disbursements) that such officers, agents and employees may directly or indirectly sustain, suffer or incur arising from or in connection with the Property Management and Leasing Agreement or the property, unless the same results from (i) the negligence or misconduct of such officer, agent or employee acting within the scope of their office, employment, or agency, or (ii) the breach of this agreement by Hines. The Company shall assume on behalf of such officer, agent and employee the defense of any action at law or in equity which may be brought against such officer, age nt or employee based upon a claim for which indemnification is applicable.

65

The Dealer Manager

Hines Real Estate Investments, Inc., our Dealer Manager, was formed in June 2003. It is registered under applicable federal and state securities laws and is qualified to do business as a securities broker-dealer throughout the United States. The Dealer Manager was formed to provide the marketing function for the distribution and sale of our common shares and for offerings by other Hines-sponsored investment vehicles. The Dealer Manager is a member firm of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.

The following table sets forth information with respect to the directors, officers and the key employees of the Dealer Manager:

Name	Age	Position and Office with the Dealer Manager
Charles M. Baughn	54	Director and Chief Executive Officer
Charles N. Hazen	48	Director
Christopher D. Hughes	47	Director
Sherri W. Schugart	43	Director
Robert F. Muller, Jr.	47	Director and President — Retail  Distribution
Frank R. Apollo	42	Vice President, Treasurer and Secretary
J. Mark Earley	45	National Sales Director — Retail  Distribution
Julie B. Nickell	40	Chief Operating Officer
Lance O. Murphy	38	Divisional Director — Retail  Distribution
Dugan Fife	35	Divisional Director — Retail  Distribution

Please see “— Our Officers and Directors” for the biographies of Messrs. Baughn, Hazen, Apollo and Ms. Schugart and see “The Hines Organization — General” for the biography of Mr. Hughes.

Robert F. Muller, Jr.   Mr. Muller joined the Dealer Manager in June of 2003 and is the President and a director of the Dealer Manager. Prior to joining the Dealer Manager, he was National Director of Sales for Morgan Stanley’s Investment Management Group, which oversaw the distribution of investment management products. Mr. Muller also served as Executive Director for Van Kampen Investments. He is a graduate of the University of Texas at Austin with a B.B.A. in Accounting and is a general securities principal and holds a Texas Real Estate Brokers License and Series 7, 24 and 63 securities licenses.

J. Mark Earley.  Mr. Earley joined the Dealer Manager in September of 2003 and is the Director of REIT Distribution of the Dealer Manager. He is responsible for overseeing share distribution nationally for the Dealer Manager. Prior to joining the Dealer Manager, he was a Managing Director for Morgan Stanley from April 2002 to September 2003. In addition, he was responsible for seeking sales and revenue growth within a region of 65 branches and approximately 1,600 financial advisors. Prior to joining Morgan Stanley, Mr. Earley was the Western Regional Sales Manager for BlackRock Funds from January 2001 to March 2002. He graduated from Stephen F. Austin State University with a B.B.A. in General Business and holds a Texas Real Estate Brokers License and Seri es 7, 24 and 63 securities licenses.

Julie B. Nickell.  Ms. Nickell joined the Dealer Manager in 2003 and is the Chief Operating Officer of the Dealer Manager. Ms. Nickell previously worked for Hines from 1994 to 1999. From 1999 until she joined the Dealer Manager in the 2003, Ms. Nickell served in the risk consulting practice of a national accounting firm. She graduated from the University of Louisiana at Monroe with a B.B.A. in Accounting. She is a certified public accountant, certified internal auditor, and holds Series 7, 24 and 63 securities licenses.

Lance O. Murphy.  Mr. Murphy joined the Dealer Manager in October of 2008 and is responsible for overseeing share distribution for the Eastern Division of the Dealer Manager. Before joining our Dealer Manager, he served as Executive Director, National Sales Manager Broker Dealer for Van Kampen Investments. Prior to that, Mr. Murphy worked as a Regional Vice President for Van Kampen Investments. He started his financial services career in 1994 with a B.B.A in finance from Texas Tech University Rawls College of Business. He holds the CIMA® — Certified Investment Management Analyst — designation and is a member of the Investment Management Consultants Associa tion.

Dugan Fife.  Mr. Fife joined the Dealer Manager in June of 2004 and is responsible for overseeing share distribution for the Western Division of the Dealer Manager. Prior to his promotion to Divisional Director, he was a Regional Sales Director for the Dealer Manager covering the states of Michigan, Indiana and Kentucky. Before joining the Dealer Manager, Mr. Fife served as a Regional Vice President for Scudder/Deutsche Bank, with responsibility for wholesaling variable annuities. Prior to that, Mr. Fife worked for Sun Life/MFSLF Securities as a Vice President responsible for wholesaling variable, fixed and indexed annuities. He has been in the securities business since 1997. He is a graduate of the University of Michigan with a B.A. in organizational stu dies and holds Series 7, 24 and 63 securities licenses.

66

MANAGEMENT COMPENSATION, EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENTS

AND OPERATING PARTNERSHIP PARTICIPATION INTEREST

Our Advisor and its affiliates will receive substantial fees in connection with this offering and our operations, which could be increased or decreased during or after this offering. The following table sets forth the type and, to the extent possible, estimates of all fees, compensation, income, expense reimbursements, interests and other payments payable to Hines or affiliates of Hines in connection with this offering and our operations. For purposes of this table, except as noted, we have assumed no volume discounts or waived commissions as discussed in the “Plan of Distribution.”

Type and Recipient	Description and Method of Computation	Estimated Maximum (Based on $3,500,000,000 in Shares)(1)
	Organizational and Offering Activities(2)
Selling Commissions — the Dealer Manager	Up to 7.0% of gross offering proceeds, excluding proceeds from our dividend reinvestment plan; all selling commissions will be reallowed to participating broker-dealers. If you are party to an agreement with a licensed broker dealer, investment advisor or bank trust department pursuant to which you pay a fee based on assets under management such as a “wrap fee”, “commission replacement fee”, or similar fee, we will waive selling commissions and dealer manager fees and sell shares to you at an aggregate 9.2% discount.	$210,000,000(3)
Dealer Manager Fee — the Dealer Manager	Up to 2.2% of gross offering proceeds, excluding proceeds from our dividend reinvestment plan, all or a portion of which may be reallowed to selected participating broker-dealers. If you are party to an agreement with a licensed broker dealer, investment advisor or bank trust department pursuant to which you pay a fee based on assets under management such as a “wrap fee”, “commission replacement fee”, or similar fee, we will waive dealer manager fees and the selling commissions and sell shares to you at an aggregate 9.2% discount.	$66,000,000(4)
No Reimbursement of Organization and Offering Expenses	All organization and offering expenses will be paid by an affiliate of Hines.(5)	Not applicable.
Investment Activities(6)
Acquisition Fee — the Advisor	With respect to each real estate investment made after the commencement of this offering up to an aggregate of $2,000,000,000 in real estate investments made after the commencement of this offering 2.5% of (i) the purchase price of real estate investments acquired directly by us, including any debt attributable to such investments, or (ii) when we make an investment indirectly through another entity, such investment’s pro rata share of the gross asset value of real estate investments held by that entity. With respect to each real estate investment made thereafter, the fee will be equal to 0.50% of the amounts set forth in (i) and (ii), as applicable.	$55,771,000(7)

67

Type and Recipient	Description and Method of Computation	Estimated Maximum (Based on $3,500,000,000 in Shares)(1)
Participation Interest in the Operating Partnership — HALP Associates Limited Partnership	A profits interest in the Operating Partnership which increases over time in a manner intended to approximate (i) an additional 0.50% cash acquisition fee as calculated above and (ii) the automatic reinvestment of such cash back into the Operating Partnership.	Not determinable at this time(8)
Debt Financing Fee — the Advisor	1.0% of the amount obtained under any property loan or made available to us under any other debt financing. In no event will the debt financing fee be paid more than once in respect of the same debt.	Not determinable at this time.(9)
	Operational Activities
Asset Management Fee — the Advisor	0.0625% per month of the net equity capital we have invested in real estate investments at the end of each month.	Not determinable at this time(10)
Participation Interest in the Operating Partnership — HALP Associates Limited Partnership	A profits interest in the Operating Partnership which increases over time in a manner intended to approximate (i) a 0.0625% per month cash asset management fee as calculated above and (ii) the automatic reinvestment of such cash back into the Operating Partnership.(8)	Not determinable at this time(10)
Expense Reimbursements in connection with our administration — the Advisor	Reimbursement of actual expenses incurred on an ongoing basis.(11)	Not determinable at this time
Property Management Fee — Hines	The lesser of (i) 2.5% of annual gross revenues received from the property, or (ii) the amount of management fees recoverable from tenants under their leases, subject to a minimum of 1.0% of annual gross revenues in the case of single-tenant properties.(12)	Not determinable at this time
Leasing Fee — Hines	1.5% of gross revenues payable over the term of each executed lease, including any amendment, renewal, extension, expansion or similar event if Hines is our primary leasing agent.(12)	Not determinable at this time
Tenant Construction Management Fees — Hines	Amount payable by the tenant under its lease or, if payable by the landlord, direct costs incurred by Hines if the related services are provided by off-site employees.(13)	Not determinable at this time
Re-development Construction Management Fees — Hines	2.5% of total project costs relating to the re- development, plus direct costs incurred by Hines in connection with providing the related services.	Not determinable at this time
Expense Reimbursements — Hines	Reimbursement of actual expenses incurred in connection with the management and operation of our properties.(14)	Not determinable at this time
	Disposition and Liquidation
Disposition Fee	Unless approved by our independent directors, no disposition fee will be paid to the Advisor or its affiliates in connection with disposition of our investments.	Not applicable

68

Type and Recipient	Description and Method of Computation	Estimated Maximum (Based on $3,500,000,000 in Shares)(1)
Incentive Fee	No incentive fee will be paid to the Advisor or its affiliates in connection with the sale of assets, liquidation or listing of our shares.	Not applicable

____________

(1)	Assumes we sell the maximum of $3,000,000,000 in shares in our primary offering and issue $500,000,000 in shares under our dividend reinvestment plan pursuant to this offering.
(2)	The total compensation related to our organizational and offering activities, which includes selling commissions and the dealer manager fee (but does not include our organization and offering expenses, because those expenses are being paid by an affiliate and not by us), will not exceed 15% of the proceeds raised in this offering. See footnote 5 below.
(3)	Commissions may be reduced for volume or other discounts or waived as further described in the “Plan of Distribution” section of this prospectus; however, for purposes of calculating the estimated maximum selling commissions in this table, we have not assumed any such discounts or waivers. Further, the Dealer Manager will not receive selling commissions for shares issued pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan.
(4)	The dealer manager fees may be reduced for volume or other discounts or waived as further described in the “Plan of Distribution” section of this prospectus; however, for purposes of calculating the estimated maximum dealer manager fees in this table, we have not assumed any such discounts or waivers. Further, the Dealer Manager will not receive the dealer manager fee for shares issued pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan.
(5)	The Advisor will pay for all organization and offering expenses, other than selling commissions and the dealer manager fee, whether incurred by us directly or through the Advisor, the Dealer Manager and/or their affiliates, which expenses are expected to consist of, among other expenses, actual legal, accounting, printing, filing fees, transfer agent costs and other offering-related expenses. Organization and offering expenses may also include, but are not limited to: (i) salaries, discretionary bonuses, benefits and other expenses of employees of our Dealer Manager while participating in the offering and marketing of our shares and in connection with their wholesaling activities; (ii) costs and expenses related to participating in broker-dealer sponsored events or hosting meetings with participating broker-dealers; (iii) 0;costs and expenses of conducting educational conferences and seminars; (iv) travel, lodging, entertainment and other expenses related to the offering and marketing of our shares; (v) advertising and marketing expenses, including the cost of promotional items; (vi) costs and expenses of conducting internal sales training and seminars and (vii) legal expenses of the Dealer Manager. We will have no liability for such expenses.
(6)	The acquisition fees and acquisition expenses incurred in connection with the purchase of real estate investments will not exceed an amount equal to 6.0% of the contract purchase price of the investment. However, a majority of our directors (including a majority of our independent directors) not otherwise interested in the transaction may approve such fees and expenses in excess of this limit if they determine the transaction to be commercially competitive, fair and reasonable to us. Tenant construction management fees and re-development construction management fees will be included in the definition of acquisition fees or acquisition expenses for this purpose to the extent that they are paid in connection with the acquisition, development or redevelopment of a property. If any such fees are paid in connection with a portion of a lease d property at the request of a tenant or in conjunction with a new lease or lease renewal, such fees will be treated as ongoing operating costs of the property, similar to leasing commissions.
(7)	For purposes of calculating the estimated maximum acquisition fees in this table, we have assumed that we will not use debt when making real estate investments. In the event we raise the maximum $3,500,000,000 pursuant to this offering and all of our real estate investments are 50% leveraged at the time we acquire them, the total acquisition fees payable will be $71,811,000. Some of these fees may be payable out of the proceeds of such borrowings.

69

(8)	Because the Participation Interest is a profits interest, any value of such interest would be ultimately realized only if the Operating Partnership has adequate gain or profit to allocate to the holder of the Participation Interest. Please see “The Operating Partnership — The Participation Interest” for more details about this interest. The component of the increase in the Participation Interest attributable to investment activities will be included in the definition of acquisition fees and will therefore be included in the 6.0% limitation calculation described above in footnote 6. In addition, the component of the increase in the Participation Interest attributable to operational activities will be included in the definition of operating expenses and will therefore be included in the 2%/25% operating expense lim itation described below in footnote 11.
(9)	Actual amounts are dependent upon the amount of any debt incurred in connection with our acquisitions and otherwise and therefore cannot be determined at the present time. In the event we raise the maximum $3,500,000,000 pursuant to this offering and all of our real estate investments are 50% leveraged, the total debt financing fees payable will be $31,811,000.
(10)	In connection with both the asset management fee and the corresponding increase in the Participation Interest, the percentage itself on an annual basis would equal 0.75%, or 1.5% on a combined basis. However, because each of the cash fee and the Participation Interest increase is calculated monthly, and the net equity capital we have invested in real estate investments may change on a monthly basis, we cannot accurately determine or calculate the amount or the value (in either dollars or percentage) of either of these items on an annual basis.
(11)	The Advisor will reimburse us for any amounts by which operating expenses exceed the greater of (i) 2.0% of our invested assets or (ii) 25% of our net income, unless our independent directors determine that such excess was justified. To the extent operating expenses exceed these limitations, they may not be deferred and paid in subsequent periods. Operating expenses include generally all expenses paid or incurred by us as determined by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or U.S. GAAP, except certain expenses identified in our charter. The expenses identified by our charter as excluded from operating expenses include: (i) expenses of raising capital such as organizational and offering expenses, legal, audit, accounting, underwriting, brokerage, listing, registration and other fees, printing and such other expenses and taxes incurred in connection with the issuance, distribution, transfer, registration and stock exchange listing of our shares; (ii) interest payments, taxes and non-cash expenditures such as depreciation, amortization and bad debt reserves; (iii) amounts paid as partnership distributions of the Operating Partnership; and (iv) all fees and expenses associated or paid in connection with the acquisition, disposition and ownership of assets (such as real estate commissions, acquisition fees and expenses, costs of foreclosure, insurance premiums, legal services, maintenance, repair or improvement of property, etc.). Please see “Management — The Advisor and the Advisory Agreement — Reimbursements by the Advisor” for a detailed description of these expenses.
(12)	Property management fees and leasing fees for international acquisitions may differ from our typical property management fees and leasing fees due to differences in international markets, but in all events the fees shall be paid in compliance with our charter and shall be approved by our independent directors.
(13)	These fees relate to construction management services for improvements and build-out to tenant space.
(14)	Included in reimbursement of actual expenses incurred by Hines are the costs of personnel and overhead expenses related to such personnel who are located in Hines central and regional offices, to the extent to which such costs and expenses relate to or support Hines’ performance of its duties. Periodically, an affiliate of Hines may be retained to provide ancillary services for a property which are not covered by a property management agreement and are generally provided by third parties. These services are provided at market terms and are generally not material to the management of the property.

70

The table below provides information regarding fees paid to our Advisor or its affiliates in connection with our operations and public offerings. It includes amounts incurred during the year ended December 31, 2008 as well as amounts payable as of December 31, 2008 (in thousands).

Type and Recipient	Incurred Year Ended December 31, 2008		Incurred and Unpaid as of December 31, 2008
Selling Commissions — the Dealer Manager	$	29,197	$	135
Dealer Manager Fee — the Dealer Manager		9,568		(93	)
Organizational and Offering Expenses — the Advisor		8,040		9
Acquisition Fee — the Advisor		11,141		4,534
Asset Management Fee — the Advisor		12,223		1,141
Participation Interest in the Operating Partnership — HALP Associates Limited Partnership (with respect to acquisitions)		18,648		45,419
Debt Financing Fee — the Advisor		1,058		1,058
Property Management Fee — Hines		8,032		(11	)
Leasing Fee — Hines		1,896		645
Tenant Construction Management Fees — Hines		197		184
Re-development Construction Management Fees — Hines		45		—
Expense Reimbursements — Hines (with respect to management and operation of the Company’s properties		16,069		1,098

In addition, we pay our independent directors certain fees, reimburse independent directors for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at board or committee meetings and award independent directors common shares under our Employee and Director Incentive Share Plan. Please see “Management — Compensation of Directors.” We will not pay fees or compensation to the Core Fund, its general partner or advisor. All fees and compensation paid to the Core Fund, its general partner or its advisor will be paid or borne solely by limited partners in the Core Fund.

Subject to limitations in our charter, the fees, compensation, income, expense reimbursements, interests and other payments payable to Hines and its affiliates may increase or decrease during this offering or future offerings from those described above if such revision is approved by our independent directors.

OUR REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS

Overview

We were formed for the purpose of acquiring real estate investments, and, as of December 31, 2008, owned direct or indirect interests in 59 properties. These properties consist of 45 U.S. office properties, one mixed-use office and retail complex in Toronto, Ontario, one industrial property in Dallas, Texas, four industrial properties in Brazil and a portfolio of eight grocery-anchored shopping centers located across four states in the United States. These properties contain, in the aggregate, approximately 30.7 million square feet of leasable space.

Although we own a non-managing general partner interest in the Core Fund and are involved in and/or supervise the management of the Core Fund, we do not control the Core Fund’s operations and its results of operations are not consolidated in our financial statements. We are providing selected combined operating data for all of the properties in which we own an interest to give investors additional information about our portfolio-wide operational position. As we do not control the Core Fund’s operations, the Core Fund’s operating data and the operating data of the combined portfolio of all properties in which we own an interest are not attributable to our oversight and management. Similarly, although we have consent rights with respect to certain actions that the joint venture that owns the industrial property in Brazi l may take, we do not control the joint venture, and the operating data of the joint venture and the industrial property are not attributable to our oversight and management.

71

The tables on the following pages provide summary information regarding the 59 properties in which we owned an interest as of December 31, 2008. Unless specified otherwise, all data is as of December 31, 2008. Each of our significant investments is briefly discussed after the table.

Direct Investments

Property	City	Date Acquired/ Acquisition Cost			Leasable Square Feet		Percent Leased			Our Effective Ownership(1)			Major Tenants
321 North Clark	Chicago, Illinois		04/2006; $247.3			885,664		99	%		100	%	ABA; Foley & Lardner LLP; Mesirow Financial
Distribution Park   Araucaria	Curitiba, Brazil		12/2008; $32.7	(2)		459,587		100	%		100	%	DHL Exel
Citymark	Dallas, Texas		08/2005; $27.8			220,079		96	%		100	%	Centex Corporation; Balfour Beatty Construction; Universal Film Exchanges, LLP
4055/4055 Corporate   Drive	Dallas, Texas		05/2008; $42.8			643,429		100	%		100	%	Kay Chemical; FleetPride Corporation; Verizon Communications, Inc.; John H. Harland/ Harland Clarke
JPMorgan Chase   Tower	Dallas, Texas		11/2007; $289.6			1,247,782		89	%		100	%	Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP; JPMorgan Chase; Deloitte LLP; Fulbright & Jaworski
345 Inverness Drive	Denver, Colorado		12/2008; $25.7			175,287		100	%		100	%	Vistar
Arapahoe Business   Park	Denver, Colorado		12/2008; $40.8			309,450		93	%		100	%	Nestle USA
Raytheon/DIRECTV   Buildings	El Segundo, California		03/2008; $120.0			550,579		100	%		100	%	Raytheon Company; DIRECTV Group, Inc.
Watergate Tower IV	Emeryville, California		12/2006; $144.9			344,433		100	%		100	%	Oracle Corporation; Novartis AG
Williams Tower	Houston, Texas		05/2008; $271.5			1,480,623		95	%		100	%	Williams Companies; Black Box Network Services; Headquarters to Hines and Hines REIT
2555 Grand	Kansas City, Missouri		02/2008; $155.8			595,607		100	%		100	%	Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP
One Wilshire	Los Angeles, California		08/2007; $287.0			661,553		99	%		100	%	CRG West; Musick, Peeler & Garrett; Verizon Communications, Inc.
3 Huntington   Quadrangle	Melville, New York		07/2007; $87.0			407,731		87	%		100	%	Empire BC/BS; Gentiva Health Services, Inc.; World Alliance Financial
Airport Corporate   Center	Miami, Florida		01/2006; $156.8			1,021,397		90	%		100	%	Norwegian Cruise Lines
Minneapolis Office/Flex   Portfolio	Minneapolis, Minnesota		09/2007; $87.0			766,039		85	%		100	%	Preferred One
3400 Data Drive	Rancho Cordova, California		11/2006; $32.8			149,703		100	%		100	%	Catholic Healthcare West
Daytona Buildings	Redmond, Washington		12/2006; $99.0			251,313		100	%		100	%	Microsoft Corporation
Laguna Buildings	Redmond, Washington		01/2007; $118.0			464,701		100	%		100	%	Honeywell Industries
1515 S Street	Sacramento, California		11/2005; $66.6			348,881		99	%		100	%	Two State of California agencies

72

Property	City	Date Acquired/ Acquisition Cost			Leasable Square Feet		Percent Leased			Our Effective Ownership(1)			Major Tenants
1900 and 2000   Alameda	San Mateo, California		06/2005; $59.8			253,141		95	%		100	%	California Casualty; County of San Mateo
Distribution Park   Elouveira	Sao Paolo, Brazil		12/2008; $40.4	(2)		534,794		100	%		100	%	DHL Exel
Distribution Park   Vinhedo	Sao Paolo, Brazil		12/2008; $41.8	(2)		609,474		100	%		100	%	DHL Exel
Seattle Design Center	Seattle, Washington		06/2007; $56.8			390,684		89	%		100	%	(13)
5th and Bell	Seattle, Washington		06/2007; $72.2			197,135		100	%		100	%	Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V.; University of Washington; Edelman
Atrium on Bay	Toronto, Ontario		02/2007; $215.5	(3)		1,077,961		98	%		100	%	Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
Total for Directly-Owned Properties						14,047,027		95	%
Indirect Investments
Core Fund
One Atlantic Center	Atlanta, Georgia		07/2006; $305.0			1,100,312		82	%		23.27	%	Alston & Bird LLP; Powell Goldstein LLP
The Carillon Building	Charlotte, North Carolina		07/2007; $140.0			470,942		97	%		23.27	%	Cadwalder Wickersham & Taft; Deloitte LLP
Charlotte Plaza	Charlotte, North Carolina		06/2007; $175.5			625,026		96	%		23.27	%	Wachovia Securities
One North Wacker	Chicago, Illinois		03/2008; $540.0			1,373,754		98	%		23.27	%	UBS; PriceWaterhouseCoopers; Citadel
Three First National   Plaza	Chicago, Illinois		03/2005; $245.3			1,420,118		92	%		18.62	%	Bell, Boyd & Lloyd LLC
333 West Wacker	Chicago, Illinois		04/2006; $223.0			845,210		94	%		18.57	%	Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP; Nuveen Investments, Inc.
One Shell Plaza	Houston, Texas		05/2004; $228.7			1,230,395		100	%		11.64	%	Shell Oil Company; Baker Botts LLP
Two Shell Plaza	Houston, Texas		05/2004; $123.1			565,467		97	%		11.64	%	Shell Oil Company
425 Lexington Avenue	New York, New York		08/2003; $358.6			700,034		100	%		11.67	%	Simpson Thatcher & Bartlett LLP; Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
499 Park Avenue	New York, New York		08/2003; $153.1			288,722		100	%(9)		11.67	%	Dreier LLP; Bloomberg LP; Cantor Fitzgerald LP
600 Lexington Avenue	New York, New York		02/2004; $91.6			285,605		93	%		11.67	%	Alvarez & Marsal
Renaissance Square	Phoenix, Arizona		12/2007; $270.9			965,508		89	%		23.27	%	Quarles & Brady Streich Lang, LLP; Lewis & Roca LLP; U.S. General Services Administration
Riverfront Plaza	Richmond, Virginia		11/2006; $277.5			951,421		100	%		23.27	%	Wachovia Securities; Hunton & Williams
Johnson Ranch   Corporate Centre	Roseville, California		05/2007;	(4)		179,990		64	%		18.57	%	Centex Homes
Roseville Corporate   Center	Roseville, California		05/2007;	(4)		111,418		91	%		18.57	%	Prudential Insurance Company; Verizon California Inc.; Umpqua Bank

73

Property	City	Date Acquired/ Acquisition Cost			Leasable Square Feet			Percent Leased			Our Effective Ownership(1)			Major Tenants
Summit at Douglas   Ridge	Roseville, California		05/2007;	(4)		185,128			78	%		18.57	%	(13)
Olympus Corporate   Centre	Roseville, California		05/2007;	(4)		191,494			40	%		18.57	%	(13)
Douglas Corporate   Center	Roseville, California		05/2007;	(4)		214,606			78	%		18.57	%	New York Life Insurance Co.
Wells Fargo Center	Sacramento, California		05/2007;	(4)		502,365			98	%		18.57	%	(13)
525 B Street	San Diego, California		08/2005; $116.3			446,737			81	%		23.27	%	Golden Eagle Insurance; Elsevier; US Navy HR
The KPMG Building	San Francisco, California		09/2004; $148.0			379,328			100	%		23.27	%	KPMG LLP; Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP; UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.; Preston Gates Ellis LLP
101 Second Street	San Francisco, California		09/2004; $157.0			388,370			91	%(10)		23.27	%	Thelen LLP
720 Olive Way	Seattle, Washington		01/2006; $83.7			300,710			94	%		18.57	%	Community Health Plan of Washington
1200 19th Street	Washington, D.C.		08/2003; $69.4			328,154	(5)		28	%		11.67	%	(13)
Warner Center	Woodland Hills, California		10/2006; $311.0			808,274			90	%		18.57	%	Health Net of California; NetZero, Inc.
Total for Core Fund Properties						14,859,088			91	%(11)
Grocery-Anchored Portfolio
Bellaire Boulevard   Center	Bellaire, Texas		11/2008;	(6)		35,081			100	%		70	%	Randall’s (Safeway)
Champions Village	Houston, Texas		11/2008;	(6)		404,820			92	%		70	%	Randall’s (Safeway); Stein Mart
King’s Crossing	Kingwood, Texas		11/2008;	(6)		126,397			97	%		70	%	Randall’s
Oak Park Village	San Antonio, Texas		11/2008;	(6)		64,287			100	%		70	%	H-E-B
Cherokee Plaza	Atlanta, Georgia		11/2008;	(6)		99,751			100	%		70	%	Kroger
University Palms
Shopping Center	Oviedo, Florida		11/2008;	(6)		99,172			99	%		70	%	Publix
Commons at Dexter   Lakes	Memphis, Tennessee		11/2008;	(6)		228,496			92	%		70	%	Kroger; Stein Mart; Marshalls; Samuels Furniture
Mendenhall Commons	Memphis, Tennessee		11/2008;	(6)		79,871			97	%		70	%	Kroger
Total for Grocery-Anchored Portfolio						1,137,875			95	%
Other
Distribution Park   Rio(7)	Rio de Janeiro, Brazil		07/2007; $53.7	(8)		693,115			99	%		50	%	DHL Exel; Schio; Cometa; Metropolitan Transports
Total for All Properties						30,737,105			93	% (12)

____________

(1) This percentage shows the effective ownership of the Operating Partnership in the properties listed. On December 31, 2008, Hines REIT owned a 97.3% interest in the Operating Partnership as its sole general partner. Affiliates of Hines owned the remaining 2.7% interest in the Operating Partnership. In addition, we owned an approximate 28.7% non-managing general partner interest in the Core Fund as of December 31, 2008. The Core Fund does not own 100% of its properties; its ownership interest in its properties ranges from 40.6% to 81.1%.

74

(2)	These three properties were purchased in a single transaction for an aggregate purchase price of 269.9 million Brazil Real (“BRL”). These amounts were translated using the currency exchange rate in effect as of the date of acquisition.
(3)	This amount was converted from 250.0 million CAD using the currency exchange rate in effect as of the date of acquisition.
(4)	These properties were purchased as part of a portfolio that included six properties for a purchase price of $490.2 million.
(5)	This square footage amount includes three floors which are being added to the building and are currently under construction. The construction is expected to be completed in April 2009.
(6)	These properties were purchased as part of a portfolio that included eight properties for a purchase price of $205.1 million. After December 31, 2008, we purchased four additional grocery-anchored shopping centers consisting of 379,664 square feet of net rentable area which were 95% leased as of the date of acquisition.
(7)	We own a 50% indirect interest in Distribution Park Rio, an industrial property located in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, through a joint venture with Hines Calpers Brazil (“HCB”), an affiliate of Hines. We formed the joint venture in June 2007 with an initial investment of $28.9 million.
(8)	This amount was converted from 103.7 million BRL using the currency exchange rate in effect as of the date of acquisition.
(9)	On December 16, 2008, Dreier LLP, a law firm tenant that leased 101,604 square feet of space at 499 Park Avenue, filed for bankruptcy. On February 18, 2009, the U.S. Bankruptcy court rejected the lease effective January 31, 2009, thus terminating the lease. This tenant has stopped paying rent and, as of March 31, 2009, has completely vacated this space. However, the leased percentage included in this table treats this space as leased as of December 31, 2008. Assuming that the Dreier space was treated as vacant, the percentage leased at this property would have been approximately 65% as of December 31, 2008.
(10)	On October 28, 2008, Thelen LLP, a law firm tenant that leased 145,158 square feet of space at 101 Second Street, dissolved its business. Thelen LLP ceased paying rent after October 31, 2008 and has vacated the space. In connection with its wind-up and dissolution on January 10, 2009, Thelen agreed to a new short-term lease. As of March 31, 2009, the tenant has completely vacated this space. However, the leasing percentage included in this table treats this space as leased as of December 31, 2008. Assuming that the Thelen space was treated as vacant, the percentage leased at this property would have been approximately 54% as of December 31, 2008.
(11)	Assuming the changes described in notes 9 and 10 above, the Core Fund’s properties would have been approximately 90% leased as of December 31, 2008.
(12)	This amount represents the percentage leased assuming we own a 100% interest in each of these properties. The percentage leased based on our effective ownership interest in each property is 95%
(13)	No tenant occupies more than 10% of the space.

75

Market and Industry Concentration

The following table provides a summary of the market concentration of our portfolio based on our pro-rata share (unless otherwise noted) of the market value of each of the properties in which we owned interests as of December 31, 2008. The estimated value of each property is based on the most recent appraisals available or the purchase price, in the case of recent acquisitions:

Market	Market Concentration: Directly-Owned Properties			Market Concentration: Indirectly-Owned Properties(1)			Market Concentration: All Properties
Los Angeles, California		16	%		6	%		12	%
Chicago, Illinois		9	%		21	%		12	%
Houston, Texas		10	%		11	%		10	%
Seattle, Washington		12	%		2	%		9	%
Dallas, Texas		12	%		—			9	%
San Francisco, California		7	%		7	%		7	%
Toronto, Ontario		8	%		—			6	%
Sacramento, California		3	%		8	%		5	%
New York, New York		2	%		18	%		4	%
Miami, Florida		6	%		—			4	%
Kansas City, Missouri		6	%		—			4	%
Atlanta, Georgia		—			6	%		2	%
Minneapolis, Minnesota		3	%		—			2	%
Sao Paulo, Brazil		3	%		—			2	%
Charlotte, North Carolina		—			5	%		2	%
Denver, Colorado		2	%		—			2	%
Richmond, Virginia		—			5	%		2	%
Phoenix, Arizona		—			4	%		2	%
Curitiba, Brazil		1	%		—			1	%
Memphis, Tennessee		—			1	%		1	%
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil		—			1	%		1	%
San Diego, California		—			2	%		1	%
Washington, D.C.		—			3	%		*
Orlando, Florida		—			*			*
San Antonio, Texas		—			*			*

____________

*	Represents less than 1%.
(1)	These amounts represent the properties in which we owned an indirect interest through our investments in the Core Fund, the portfolio of eight grocery-anchored shopping centers and our joint venture in Brazil as of December 31, 2008. These amounts assume we own a 100% interest in each of the properties.

76

The following table provides a summary of the industry concentration of the tenants of the properties in which we owned interests based on our pro-rata share (unless otherwise noted) of their leased square footage as of December 31, 2008.

Industry	Industry Concentration: Directly-Owned Properties			Industry Concentration: Indirectly- Owned Properties(1)			Industry Concentration: All Properties
Manufacturing		25	%		3	%		20	%
Finance and Insurance		14	%		27	%		16	%
Legal		12	%		28	%		14	%
Information		13	%		3	%		11	%
Government		6	%		3	%		5	%
Grocery-Anchored Retail		—			7	%		5	%
Professional Services		4	%		5	%		4	%
Oil & Gas/Energy		3	%		8	%		3	%
Transportation and Warehousing		2	%		4	%		3	%
Health Care		4	%		1	%		3	%
Real Estate		3	%		2	%		2	%
Accounting		2	%		5	%		2	%
Wholesale Trade		3	%		*			2	%
Construction		2	%		1	%		2	%
Other Services		2	%		*			2	%
Other		1	%		1	%		2	%
Arts, Entertainment and Recreation		2	%		*			2	%
Administrative and Support Services		1	%		1	%		1	%
Retail		1	%		1	%		1	%

____________

*	Represents less than 1%.
(1)	These amounts represent the properties in which we owned an indirect interest through our investments in the Core Fund, the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio and our joint venture in Brazil as of December 31, 2008. These amounts assume we own a 100% interest in each of the properties.

77

Lease Expiration

Directly-Owned Properties

The following table lists, on an aggregate basis, all of the scheduled lease expirations for each of the years ending December 31, 2009 through December 31, 2018 and thereafter for the 25 properties we owned directly as of December 31, 2008. The table shows the approximate leasable square feet represented by the applicable lease expirations:

			Leasable Area
Year	Number of Leases		Approximate Square Feet		Percent of Total Leasable Area
Vacant		—		633,527		4.6	%
2009		98		1,112,777		8.0	%
2010		103		864,844		6.2	%
2011		91		1,006,490		7.2	%
2012		60		1,546,290		11.1	%
2013		63		3,641,413		26.1	%
2014		32		732,604		5.3	%
2015		20		569,847		4.1	%
2016		17		758,727		5.4	%
2017		17		561,146		4.0	%
2018		18		1,201,974		8.6	%
Thereafter		9		1,312,890		9.4	%

Indirectly-Owned Properties

The following table lists all of the scheduled lease expirations for each of the years ending December 31, 2009 through December 31, 2018 and thereafter for the 34 properties in which we owned an indirect interest as of December 31, 2008. The table shows the approximate leasable square feet represented by the applicable lease expirations and assumes we own a 100% interest in each of the properties:

			Leasable Area
Year	Number of Leases		Approximate Square Feet		Percent of Total Leasable Area
Vacant		—		1,380,943		8.3	%
2009		203		1,636,245		9.8	%
2010		135		1,170,056		7.0	%
2011		131		1,471,822		8.9	%
2012		116		1,791,160		10.8	%
2013		103		2,566,018		15.4	%
2014		49		807,818		4.9	%
2015		30		2,190,091		13.2	%
2016		24		442,338		2.7	%
2017		21		493,318		3.0	%
2018		18		1,093,051		6.6	%
Thereafter		32		1,563,062		9.4	%

78

All Properties

The following table lists our pro-rata share of the scheduled lease expirations for each of the years ending December 31, 2009 through December 31, 2018 and thereafter for all of the properties in which we owned an interest as of December 31, 2008. The table shows the approximate leasable square feet represented by the applicable lease expirations:

			Leasable Area
Year	Number of Leases		Approximate Square Feet(1)		Percent of Total Leasable Area(1)
Vacant		—		924,219		5.2	%
2009		301		1,544,571		8.6	%
2010		238		1,241,977		6.9	%
2011		222		1,343,791		7.5	%
2012		176		2,010,402		11.2	%
2013		166		4,412,956		24.7	%
2014		81		917,385		5.1	%
2015		50		921,587		5.2	%
2016		41		846,749		4.7	%
2017		38		660,405		3.7	%
2018		36		1,451,736		8.1	%
Thereafter		41		1,626,144		9.1	%

____________

(1) These amounts represent our pro-rata share based on our effective ownership in each of the properties as of December 31, 2008.

Our Significant Investments

Specified below is certain information about the significant investments we owned as of December 31, 2008. These properties will be subject to competition from similar properties within their market areas and their economic performance could be affected by changes in local economic conditions. In evaluating these properties for acquisition, we considered a variety of factors including location, functionality and design, price per square foot, replacement cost, the credit worthiness of tenants, length of lease terms, market fundamentals and the in-place rental rates compared to market rates.

One Wilshire

One Wilshire, an office property in Los Angeles, California, consists of a thirty-story office building constructed in 1966 and renovated in 1992. The property contains 661,553 square feet of rentable area and is 99% leased. CRG West LLC, a data center and property management company, leases 172,970 square feet or approximately 26% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in June 2017. Musick, Peeler & Garrett LLP, a national law firm, leases 106,475 square feet or approximately 16% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in October 2018 and contains options to renew for two additional five-year periods. Verizon Communications, Inc., a broadband and telecommunications company, leases 79,716 square feet or approximately 12% of the building’s rentable a rea, under seven leases that expire in various years through 2013. One of the leases expires in July 2012 and contains an option to renew for one additional five-year period and another lease expires in August 2013 and contains options to renew for two additional five-year periods. The remaining rentable area is leased to 44 tenants, none of which leases more than 10% of the building’s rentable area.

79

The following table shows the weighted average occupancy rate, expressed as a percentage of rentable square feet, and the average effective annual gross rent per leased square foot, for One Wilshire during the past five years ended December 31:

Year	Weighted Average Occupancy			Average Effective Annual Gross Rent per Leased Sq. Ft.(1)
2004		92.8	%	$	22.16
2005		97.7	%	$	21.94
2006		97.3	%	$	21.79
2007		99.3	%	$	27.90
2008		99.0	%	$	41.14

____________

(1) Average effective annual gross rent per leased square foot for each year is calculated by dividing such year’s accrual-basis total rent revenue (including operating expense recoveries) by the weighted average square footage under lease during such year.

In connection with our acquisition of One Wilshire, we paid our Advisor approximately $1.4 million in cash acquisition fees. In addition, the interest in the Operating Partnership represented by the Participation Interest increased as a result of this acquisition.

We currently have no plans for material renovations or other capital improvements at the property and believe the property is suitable for its intended purpose and adequately covered by insurance. The cost of One Wilshire (excluding the cost attributable to land) is being depreciated for tax purposes over a 40-year period on a straight-line basis.

The following table lists, on an aggregate basis, all of the scheduled lease expirations each of the years ending December 31, 2009 through 2018 for One Wilshire. The table shows the approximate leasable square feet represented by the applicable lease expirations:

			Gross Leasable Area
Year	Number of Leases		Approximate Square Feet		Percent of Total Leasable Area
2009		10		34,781		5.3	%
2010		10		36,124		5.5	%
2011		8		82,669		12.5	%
2012		4		82,735		12.5	%
2013		6		83,036		12.6	%
2014		2		16,645		2.5	%
2015		2		14,025		2.1	%
2016		—		—		—
2017		5		189,187		28.6	%
2018		1		106,475		16.1	%
Thereafter		1		10,848		1.6	%

Chase Tower

JPMorgan Chase Tower (“Chase Tower”), a 55-story office building located in the uptown submarket of Dallas, Texas, was constructed in 1987. It contains 1,247,782 square feet of rentable area that is approximately 89% leased. Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP, a law firm, leases 207,833 square feet or approximately 17% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in December 2015. JPMorgan Chase, a financial services firm, leases 195,805 square feet or approximately 16% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in September 2022. Deloitte LLP, a public accounting firm, leases 154,476 square feet or approximately 12% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in June 2012. Fulbright & Jaworski, a law firm, leases 139,565&# 160;square feet or approximately 11% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in December 2016. The remaining rentable area is leased to 36 tenants, none of which leases more than 10% of the building’s rentable area.

80

The following table shows the weighted average occupancy rate, expressed as a percentage of rentable square feet, and the average effective annual gross rent per leased square foot, for Chase Tower during the past five years ended December 31:

Year	Weighted Average Occupancy			Average Effective Annual Gross Rent per Leased Sq. Ft.(1)
2004		80.8	%	$	26.01
2005		77.7	%	$	25.35
2006		80.1	%	$	24.52
2007		85.0	%	$	22.68
2008		87.7	%	$	28.90

____________

(1) Average effective annual gross rent per leased square foot for each year is calculated by dividing such year’s accrual-basis total rent revenue (including operating expense recoveries) by the weighted average square footage under lease during such year.

In connection with our acquisition of Chase Tower, we paid our Advisor approximately $1.4 million in cash acquisition fees. In addition, the interest in the Operating Partnership represented by the Participation Interest increased as a result of this acquisition.

We currently have no plans for material renovations or other capital improvements at the property and believe the property is suitable for its intended purpose and adequately covered by insurance. The cost of Chase Tower (excluding the cost attributable to land) is being depreciated for tax purposes over a 40-year period on a straight-line basis.

The following table lists, on an aggregate basis, all of the scheduled lease expirations for each of the years ending December 31, 2009 through 2018 for Chase Tower. The table shows the approximate leasable square feet represented by the applicable lease expirations:

			Gross Leasable Area
Year	Number of Leases		Approximate Square Feet		Percent of Total Leasable Area
2009		7		28,294		2.3	%
2010		3		25,061		2.0	%
2011		8		62,687		5.0	%
2012		7		199,056		16.0	%
2013		5		52,213		4.2	%
2014		—		—		—
2015		2		222,726		17.8	%
2016		3		191,246		15.3	%
2017		1		26,122		2.1	%
2018		3		87,468		7.0	%
Thereafter		1		195,805		15.7	%

Williams Tower

Williams Tower is comprised of: a 64-story office building with an adjacent parking garage located in the Galleria/West Loop submarket of Houston, Texas and a 2.3-acre land parcel located across the street from Williams Tower on Post Oak Boulevard. The balance of the undivided interest in the park is owned by an affiliate of Hines. The seller, Transco Tower Limited, is not affiliated with us or our affiliates.

81

Williams Tower was constructed in 1982 and consists of approximately 1.5 million square feet of rentable area that is approximately 95% leased. Williams companies and its subsidiaries, a natural gas pipe line operator, leases 287,523 square feet or approximately 19% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in March 2014 and contains options to renew for three additional five-year periods. Black Box Network Services (formerly known as NextiraOne, LLC), a telecommunications infrastructure provider, leases 186,777 square feet or approximately 12% of the building’s rentable area, under a lease that expired in March 2009. The remaining rentable area is leased to 47 tenants, none of which leases more than 10% of the building’s rentable area.

Williams Tower is managed by Hines. In addition, we are headquartered in Williams Tower and Hines and its affiliates lease space in Williams Tower. In the aggregate, Hines and its affiliates lease 9% of the building’s rentable area.

The contract purchase price for Williams Tower was approximately $271.5 million, exclusive of transaction costs, financing fees and working capital reserves. The acquisition was funded using proceeds from our public offerings and borrowings under our revolving credit facility with KeyBank National Association.

In connection with the acquisition of this property, we paid our Advisor approximately $1.4 million in cash acquisition fees. In addition, the interest in the Operating Partnership represented by the Participation Interest increased as a result of this acquisition. Hines will continue to serve as the property manager and will provide services and receive certain fees and expense reimbursements in connection with the leasing, operation and management of Williams Tower.

We currently have no plans for material renovations or other capital improvements at the property and believe the property is suitable for its intended purpose and adequately covered by insurance. The cost of Williams Tower (excluding the cost attributable to land) will be depreciated for tax purposes over a 40-year period on a straight-line basis.

The following table shows the weighted average occupancy rate, expressed as a percentage of rentable square feet, and the average effective annual gross rent per leased square foot, for Williams Tower during the past five years ended December 31:

Year	Weighted Average Occupancy			Average Effective Annual Gross Rent per Leased Sq. Ft.(1)
2004		68.3	%	$	22.56
2005		59.8	%	$	20.65
2006		68.7	%	$	20.91
2007		88.6	%	$	18.55
2008		94.7	%	$	24.18

____________

(1) Average effective annual gross rent per leased square foot for each year is calculated by dividing such year’s accrual-basis total rent revenue (including operating expense recoveries) by the weighted average square footage under lease during such year.

82

The following table lists, on an aggregate basis, all of the scheduled lease expirations for each of the years ending December 31, 2009 through 2018 for Williams Tower. The table shows the approximate leasable square feet represented by the applicable lease expirations:

			Gross Leasable Area
Year	Number of Leases		Approximate Square Feet		Percent of Total Leasable Area
2009		6		238,984		16.1	%
2010		7		106,760		7.2	%
2011		4		37,893		2.6	%
2012		4		30,601		2.1	%
2013		7		155,935		10.5	%
2014		9		369,869		25.0	%
2015		3		43,068		2.9	%
2016		7		251,423		17.0	%
2017		2		89,284		6.0	%
2018		1		45,402		3.1	%
Thereafter		—		—		—

Atrium on Bay

Atrium on Bay, a mixed-use office and retail complex located in the Downtown North submarket of the central business district of Toronto, Canada, was constructed in 1984. Atrium on Bay is comprised of three office towers, a two-story retail mall, and a two-story parking garage. The buildings consist of 1,077,961 square feet of rentable area and are 98% leased to a variety of office and retail tenants. The Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, a financial institution, leases 364,043 square feet, or approximately 34% of the rentable area, through leases that expire in 2011, 2013 and 2016. The balance of the complex is leased to 67 tenants, none of which leases more than 10% of the rentable area of the complex.

The following table shows the weighted average occupancy rate, expressed as a percentage of rentable square feet, and the average effective annual gross rent per leased square foot, for the property during the past five years ended December 31:

Year	Weighted Average Occupancy			Average Effective Annual Gross Rent per Leased Sq. Ft.(1)
2004		88.3	%	$	29.88
2005		85.4	%	$	32.46
2006		83.6	%	$	34.22
2007		86.6	%	$	32.78
2008		90.4	%	$	33.45

____________

(1) Average effective annual gross rent per leased square foot for each year is calculated by dividing such year’s accrual-basis total rent revenue (including operating expense recoveries) by the weighted average square footage under lease during such year.

We currently have no plans for material renovations or other capital improvements at the property and believes the property is suitable for its intended purpose and adequately covered by insurance. The cost of Atrium on Bay (excluding the cost attributable to land) is being depreciated for tax purposes over a 40-year period on a straight-line basis.

83

The following table lists, on an aggregate basis, all of the scheduled lease expirations each of the years ending December 31, 2009 through 2018 for Atrium on Bay. The table shows the approximate leasable square feet represented by the applicable lease expirations:

			Gross Leasable Area
Year	Number of Leases		Approximate Square Feet		Percent of Total Leasable Area
2009		9		88,427		8.2	%
2010		12		20,470		1.9	%
2011		13		60,025		5.6	%
2012		11		116,730		10.8	%
2013		12		204,042		18.9	%
2014		7		103,133		9.6	%
2015		5		33,956		3.2	%
2016		4		218,730		20.3	%
2017		2		7,737		0.7	%
2018		7		179,160		16.6	%
Thereafter		1		10,251		1.0	%

321 North Clark

321 North Clark, an office property in Chicago, Illinois consists of a 35-story office building and a parking structure that were constructed in 1987. The property contains 885,664 square feet of rentable area and is 99% leased. The American Bar Association leases 225,555 square feet, or approximately 25% of the property’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in June 2019 and provides an option to renew for one ten-year term. The lease also provides a termination option effective in June 2014 and contraction options in June 2011 and June 2016, subject to certain penalties. Foley & Lardner LLP, a legal firm, leases 211,546 square feet, or approximately 24% of the property’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in April 2018 and provides options to renew for two five-year terms. The lease also pro vides contraction options effective in April 2010 and April 2013, subject to certain penalties. Mesirow Financial, a diversified financial services firm, leases 185,442 square feet, or approximately 21% of the property’s rentable area, under a lease that expires in December 2009 and provides an option to renew for one additional five year term. The remaining rentable area of 321 North Clark is leased to 23 tenants, none of which leases more than 10% of the property’s rentable area.

The following table shows the weighted average occupancy rate, expressed as a percentage of rentable square feet, and the average effective annual gross rent per leased square foot, for the property during the past five years ended December 31:

Year	Weighted Average Occupancy			Average Effective Annual Gross Rent per Leased Sq. Ft.(1)
2004		67.9	%	$	17.94	(1)
2005		85.3	%	$	19.85	(1)
2006		91.5	%	$	20.29	(1)
2007		96.1	%	$	36.02	(2)
2008		98.6	%	$	36.53	(2)

____________

(1) Average effective annual gross rent per leased square foot for 2004-2006 is calculated by dividing such year’s cash-basis total rent revenue (excluding operating expense recoveries in excess of each tenant’s base year component), by the weighted average square footage under lease during such year.

84

(2) Average effective annual gross rent per leased square foot for 2007-2008 is calculated by dividing such year’s accrual-basis total rent revenue (including operating expense recoveries) by the weighted average square footage under lease during such year.

We currently have no plans for material renovations or other capital improvements at the property and believe the property is suitable for its intended purpose and adequately covered by insurance. The cost of 321 North Clark (excluding the cost attributable to land) is being depreciated for tax purposes over a 40-year period on a straight-line basis.

The following table lists, on an aggregate basis, all of the scheduled lease expirations each of the years ending December 31, 2009 through 2018 for 321 North Clark. The table shows the approximate leasable square feet represented by the applicable lease expirations:

			Gross Leasable Area
Year	Number of Leases		Approximate Square Feet		Percent of Total Leasable Area
2009		9		237,567		26.8	%
2010		1		7,081		0.8	%
2011		6		23,996		2.7	%
2012		1		22,493		2.5	%
2013		—		—		—
2014		—		—		—
2015		2		29,224		3.3	%
2016		—		—		—
2017		3		105,691		11.9	%
2018		1		211,546		23.9	%
Thereafter		3		235,396		26.6	%

We currently have no plans for material renovations or other capital improvements at the property, and we believe the property is suitable for its intended purpose and adequately covered by insurance. The cost of 321 North Clark (excluding the cost attributable to land) is being depreciated for tax purposes over a 40-year period on a straight-line basis. We believe the property offers several competitive advantages, including its landmark presence in a central river-front location near the heart of the River North entertainment, retail and residential center of Chicago.

Our Permanent Debt and Revolving Credit Facility

Permanent Debt Secured by Our Significant Properties

Debt Secured by One Wilshire

The Operating Partnership and a subsidiary of the Operating Partnership that owns One Wilshire borrowed $159.5 million from The Prudential Insurance Company of America pursuant to a deed of trust and security agreement and a promissory note. Pursuant to the loan documents executed in connection with this loan, it is secured by a mortgage and related security interests in One Wilshire. The loan documents also include assignments of rent, leases and permits for the benefit of the lender. The loan matures on November 1, 2012 and bears interest at a fixed annual rate of 5.98%. Interest payments are due monthly, beginning on December 1, 2007 through maturity. The loan may be repaid in full prior to maturity, subject to a prepayment premium. The lender may exercise its rights under the loan documents, including the right of fo reclosure and the right to accelerate payment of the entire balance of the loan (including fees and the prepayment premium) upon events of default. The loan documents include customary events of default with corresponding grace periods, including, without limitation, payment defaults, cross-defaults to other agreements and bankruptcy-related defaults. The subsidiary of the Operating Partnership agreed to indemnify the Lender for all environmental liabilities with respect to One Wilshire. A default under this indemnity is included among the events of default under the loan documents.

85

Debt Secured by Williams Tower

The Operating Partnership and a subsidiary of the Operating Partnership that owns Williams Tower borrowed $165.0 million from the New York State Teachers’ Retirement System of America (“NYSTRS”) pursuant to a deed of trust and a promissory note. The loan is secured by a mortgage and related security interests in Williams Tower. The loan documents also include assignments of rent, leases, licenses and contracts for the benefit of the lender. The loan matures on June 1, 2013 and bears interest at a fixed annual rate of 5.50%. Interest payments are due monthly, beginning on July 1, 2008 through maturity. The loan may be repaid in full prior to maturity, subject to a prepayment premium. NYSTRS may exercise its rights under the loan documents, including the right of foreclosure and the right to accelerate pa yment of the entire balance of the loan (including fees and the prepayment premium) upon events of default. The loan documents include customary events of default with corresponding grace periods, including, without limitation, payment defaults, cross-defaults to other agreements and bankruptcy-related defaults. The subsidiary of the Operating Partnership agreed to indemnify NYSTRS for all environmental liabilities with respect to Williams Tower. A default under this indemnity is included among the events of default under the loan documents.

Debt Secured by Atrium on Bay

On February 26, 2007, we entered into a $190.0 million CAD (approximately $163.9 million USD as of February 26, 2007) mortgage loan with Capmark Finance, Inc. (“Capmark”) in connection with our acquisition of Atrium on Bay. This loan bears interest at an effective fixed rate of 5.33%, has a 10-year term and is secured by Atrium on Bay. The loan documents contain customary events of default with corresponding grace periods, including, without limitation, payment defaults, cross-defaults to other agreements and bankruptcy-related defaults, and customary covenants, including limitations on the incurrence of debt and granting of liens. This loan is not recourse to Hines REIT.

Met Life Credit Facility

A subsidiary of the Operating Partnership entered into a credit agreement with Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, which provides a secured credit facility to the borrower and certain of its subsidiaries in the maximum principal amount of $750.0 million, subject to certain borrowing limitations (the “Met Life Credit Facility”). Borrowings under the Met Life Credit Facility may be drawn at any time until December 20, 2009, subject to the approval of Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Such borrowings will be interest-only loans with fixed rates of interest which will be negotiated separately for each borrowing and will have terms of five to ten years. Each loan will contain a prepayment lockout period of two years and thereafter, prepayment will be permitted subject to certain fees.

The Met Life Credit Facility also contains other customary events of default, some with corresponding cure periods, including, without limitation, payment defaults, cross-defaults to other agreements evidencing indebtedness and bankruptcy-related defaults, and customary covenants, including limitations on the incurrence of debt and granting of liens and the maintenance of minimum loan-to-value and debt service coverage ratios.

Certain subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership borrowed approximately $205.0 million under the Met Life Credit Facility to repay amounts owed under the Operating Partnership’s existing revolving credit facility with KeyBank. This initial borrowing under the Met Life Credit Facility is secured by mortgages or deeds of trust and related assignments and security interests on two properties: JP Morgan Chase Tower in Dallas, Texas and the Minneapolis Office/Flex Portfolio, a collection of office/flex buildings in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership that own such properties are the borrowers named in the loan documents reflecting the initial $205.0 million borrowing. As substitute security for borrowings under the Met Life Credit Facility, the Operating Partnership may, at its election and subject to certain conditions and fees, pledge newly acquired properties. The initial $205.0 million borrowing has a term of five years and bears interest at 5.70%. At its option, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company may accelerate the repayment of the initial borrowing upon an event of default.

86

HSH Credit Facility

We have a credit agreement with HSH Nordbank AG, New York Branch (“HSH Nordbank”) providing for a secured credit facility in the maximum principal amount of $520.0 million (the “HSH Facility”), subject to certain borrowing limitations. We have utilized the total borrowing capacity under the HSH Facility as follows:

Description	Origination Date	Maturity Date	Interest Rate(1)			Principal Outstanding at December 31, 2008
HSH Nordbank — Citymark, 321 North Clark, 1900 and 2000 Alameda	8/1/2006	8/1/2016		5.8575	%	$	185,000
HSH Nordbank — 3400 Data Drive, Watergate Tower IV	1/23/2007	1/12/2017		5.2505	%		98,000
HSH Nordbank — Daytona and Laguna Buildings	5/2/2007	5/2/2017		5.3550	%		119,000
HSH Nordbank — 3 Huntington Quadrangle	7/19/2007	7/19/2017		5.9800	%		48,000
HSH Nordbank — Seattle Design Center/5th and Bell	8/14/2007	8/14/2017		6.0300	%		70,000
TOTAL						$	520,000

____________

(1) Borrowings under the HSH Credit Facility have variable interest rates equal to one-month LIBOR plus an applicable spread of 0.40% to 0.45%. However, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement which effectively fixed the interest rates of these borrowings at the rates listed in the table above.

Loans under the HSH Facility may be prepaid in whole or in part, subject to the payment of certain prepayment fees and breakage costs. The Operating Partnership provides customary non-recourse carve-out guarantees under the HSH Facility and limited guarantees with respect to the payment and performance of (i) certain tenant improvement and leasing commission obligations in the event the properties securing the loan fail to meet certain occupancy requirements and (ii) certain major capital repairs with respect to the properties securing the loans.

The HSH Facility provides that an event of default will exist if a change in majority ownership or control occurs for the Advisor or Hines, or if the Advisor no longer provides advisory services or manages the day-to-day operations of Hines REIT. The HSH Facility also contains other customary events of default, some with corresponding cure periods, including, without limitation, payment defaults, cross-defaults to other agreements evidencing indebtedness and bankruptcy-related defaults, and customary covenants, including limitations on the incurrence of debt and granting of liens and the maintenance of certain financial ratios.

Additionally, HSH Nordbank has the right to have the properties serving as collateral under this facility appraised every two years. Should the aggregate outstanding principal amounts under this facility exceed 55% of the lender’s appraised values, we will be required to make partial payment or provide additional collateral to eliminate such excess. Considering the declining real estate values in recent months, we expect that we may be required to repay certain amounts outstanding in the upcoming quarters to maintain compliance with this covenant. Should we need to do so, we expect to fund such amounts with proceeds from our current offering or with borrowings from our revolving credit facility.

Our Revolving Credit Facility

We have a revolving credit facility with KeyBank, as administrative agent for itself and various other lenders, with maximum aggregate borrowing capacity of up to $250.0 million. We established this facility to repay certain bridge financing incurred in connection with certain of our acquisitions and to provide a source of funds for future real estate investments and to fund our general working capital needs.

The credit facility has a maturity date of October 31, 2009, which is subject to extension at our election for two successive periods of one year each, subject to specified conditions. The facility allows, at our election, for borrowing at a variable rate or a LIBOR-based rate plus a spread ranging from 125 to 200 basis points based on prescribed leverage ratios. We expect to exercise our option to extend the facility prior to its maturity date in October 2009. The weighted-average interest rate on outstanding borrowings was 1.8% as of December 31, 2008.

87

In addition to customary covenants and events of default, the credit facility provides that it shall be an event of default under the agreement if our Advisor ceases to be controlled by Hines or if Hines ceases to be majority-owned and controlled, directly or indirectly, by Jeffrey C. Hines or certain members of his family. The loan is secured by a pledge of the Operating Partnership’s equity interests in entities that directly or indirectly hold real property assets, including our interest in the Core Fund, subject to certain limitations and exceptions. We have entered into a subordination agreement with Hines and our Advisor, which provides that the rights of Hines and the Advisor to be reimbursed by us for certain expenses are subordinate to our obligations under the credit agreement.

On March 11, 2009, we had a $91.0 million mortgage loan which matured, and the non-payment of this loan at maturity created a non-monetary default under our revolving credit facility. We were granted an extension which was set to expire on April 23, 2009 to cure this default while we were negotiating a modification to the loan documents to provide for an extension of the maturity of such loan. On April 16, 2009, we executed a modification to the $91.0 million mortgage and pursuant to the terms of the modification, the maturity of the mortgage was extended to March 11, 2010 with the option for an additional 6-month extension subject to certain conditions. Concurrently, we made a principal payment of approximately $13.1 million to reduce the outstanding principal balance to $77.9 million. In additi on, because the modification was executed prior to the expiration of the extension that was previously granted to us, it cured the related non-monetary default under our revolving credit agreement, so we are back in compliance under our credit facility. All other significant terms and covenants of the loan remained the same, including the interest rate of 4.775%.

Given the current economic environment, should real estate values experience further declines, it could impact our ability to comply with certain covenants in the future which could limit our availability of funds under our revolving credit facility.

Purpose and Structure of the Core Fund

The Core Fund is an investment vehicle organized in August 2003 by Hines to invest in existing office properties in the United States. The third-party investors in the Core Fund other than us are, and Hines expects that future third-party investors in the Core Fund will continue to be, primarily U.S. and foreign institutional investors and high net worth individuals. Under the terms of the organizational documents of the Core Fund, Hines and its affiliates are required to maintain, directly or indirectly, the greater of $25.0 million or 1.0% of the equity capital of the Core Fund. As of December 31, 2008, we had invested a total of approximately $395.5 million and owned a 28.7% non-managing general partner interest in the Core Fund.

Please see “Our Real Estate Investments — Overview” for a description of the properties in which we own an interest through the Core Fund.

Hines formed the Core Fund as an investment vehicle to acquire “core” office buildings in the United States that Hines believes are desirable long-term “core” holdings. The Core Fund generally targets office properties located in a central business districts or suburban locations. The Core Fund may acquire a mixed-use property, so long as at least 70% of the projected net operating income from the property is attributable to office components. In any case, property acquired by the Core Fund cannot have a material hotel or lodging component or involve raw land, unless the fund has a reasonable plan for disposing of such components within 12 months after making the investment. The Core Fund has raised capital primarily from U.S. and foreign institutional investors and high net worth individuals. As long as we are a non-managing general partner of the Core Fund, the Core Fund must provide us written notice of any capital call issued by the Core Fund. We have the right to increase our non-managing general partner interest in an amount up to 40% of such capital call. We have no assurance that the Core Fund will raise significant capital after the date of this prospectus or that our board of directors will approve any additional investments in the Core Fund.

88

The Core Fund periodically adjusts the per unit price at which investors acquire partnership interests. Investors in the Core Fund generally make capital commitments, which are called at times when the Core Fund needs capital, such as to acquire properties, pay for significant capital improvements, repay debt or to redeem partnership units held by existing investors. If we exercise our right to participate in Core Fund capital calls, we may acquire additional non-managing general partner interests at a per unit price that may be higher or lower than the per unit price paid by other investors contributing capital at an earlier or later time.

In the event that an affiliate of Hines is no longer our advisor, our right to acquire up to 40% of the partnership units sold by the Core Fund will terminate. Except as described in this prospectus, we are not obligated to fund any future capital calls; however, once we contractually commit to make an investment, we will be obligated to contribute capital in accordance with the terms of such commitment. We have invested, and we may invest a substantial portion of the proceeds raised in this offering, in real estate investments outside of the Core Fund.

Description of the Non-Managing General Partner Interest and Certain Provisions of the Core Fund Partnership Agreement

Non-Managing General Partner Interest

We are involved in and/or supervise the management of the Core Fund. Hines US Core Office Capital LLC, the managing general partner and an affiliate of Hines, remains solely responsible for the day-to-day operations of the Core Fund. We, as non-managing general partner, are a general partner for the purposes of the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act, and our approval is required before the Core Fund may take certain actions, including but not limited to:

• selling investments to Hines or any affiliate of Hines or acquiring investments from Hines or any affiliate of Hines;

• merging or consolidating the Core Fund with any affiliate of Hines;

• removing and appointing any property manager or approving renewals, amendments or modifications to any Property Management and Leasing Agreement; and

• removing and appointing any advisor to the Core Fund that is an affiliate of Hines, and approving renewals, amendments or modifications to any advisory agreement between the Core Fund or any operating company of the Core Fund and any advisor that is an affiliate of Hines.

For all decisions involving transactions with Hines, any action we take as non-managing general partner would need to be approved by a majority of our independent directors in accordance with our conflict of interest procedures. Please see “Conflicts of Interest — Certain Conflict Resolution Procedures.”

We may sell or otherwise transfer our non-managing general partner interest in the Core Fund subject to restrictions intended to comply with applicable securities laws, to prevent a termination of the Core Fund, and to enable the Core Fund to:

• avoid investment company status under the Investment Company Act;

• maintain its status as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes;

• avoid being treated as a “publicly traded partnership”; and

• avoid any or all of its assets being considered “plan assets” or subject to the provisions of ERISA.

However, if we sell or otherwise transfer any non-managing general partner interest in the Core Fund, such transferee will be considered to be a limited partner and the transferred interest will become a limited partner interest.

89

Summary of Certain Provisions of the Core Fund Partnership Agreement

Set forth below is a summary of the material terms of the Core Fund partnership agreement relating to our investment in the Core Fund.

Management Board

The managing general partner of the Core Fund is subject to the oversight of a management board which, as of the date of this prospectus, had five members. The members of the management board were designated by the managing general partner. The approval of the management board is required for funding new investments, incurring indebtedness, new offerings of equity interests in the Core Fund, acquisitions and dispositions of investments, mergers, combinations, or consolidations involving any entity through which the Core Fund invests in properties, transfers or exchanges of properties or other assets, amendments and restatement of the constituent documents of an entity through which the Core Fund invests in properties, annual budgets and certain other major decisions. Decisions of the management board will require the approval of a majo rity of its members.

Members of the management board will not receive any compensation for serving in such capacity. The current members of the management board are as follows:

Name	Position
Managing General Partner designees:
Jeffrey C. Hines	President, Hines
C. Hastings Johnson	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Hines
Charles M. Baughn	Executive Vice President, Hines
Charles N. Hazen	Senior Vice President, Hines and President and Chief Executive Officer, Core Fund
Edmund A. Donaldson	Vice President, Hines and Chief Investment Officer, Core Fund

Advisory Committee

The Core Fund has an advisory committee composed of representatives of certain investors in the Core Fund or entities in which the Core Fund has an interest selected from time to time by the managing general partner. No member of the advisory committee is or will be an affiliate of Hines. The advisory committee’s approval is required for:

• certain matters involving potential affiliated transactions between Hines and the managing general partner, Hines or their affiliates;

• the selection of appraisers by the managing general partner; and

• in-kind distributions of publicly-traded securities.

Any action by the advisory committee requires the vote of members who account for at least a majority of the aggregate equity interests in the Core Fund held by the investors represented on the advisory committee. Members of the advisory committee will be reimbursed by the Core Fund for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses but will not receive compensation for serving on the advisory committee.

Removal of the Managing General Partner

The managing general partner will be subject to removal without cause at any time with the approval of the holders of not less than 75% in interest of limited partners of the Core Fund and of certain designated investors in entities in which the Core Fund has an interest (such limited partners and such other investors, collectively, “Fund Investors”), other than a Fund Investor that is an affiliate of Hines. For purposes of such a vote, we will not be considered an affiliate of Hines and will vote any interest we hold in the Core Fund as directed by our independent directors. We are entitled to call a meeting of Fund Investors to consider removing the managing general partner which, on a potential conflict of interest event, could be called solely by our independent directors. In the event of such removal, al l partnership interests held by the managing general partner and its affiliates, including the participation interest held in the Core Fund, will be repurchased by the issuance of a note from the Core Fund. Any such note will have a term of not more than three years, bear interest at the prime rate and be in a principal amount equal to the aggregate value of such units and participation interests valued at the then-current per unit net asset value.

90

The managing general partner will also be subject to removal upon the vote of at least a majority-in-interest of Fund Investors (not affiliated with Hines) at any time on the grounds that it has committed willful malfeasance in the performance of its duties or has committed gross negligence, willful misconduct or fraud that has a material adverse effect on the Core Fund. For purposes of such a vote, we will not be considered an affiliate of Hines and will vote any interest we hold in the Core Fund as directed by the independent members of our board of directors. We are entitled to call a meeting of Fund Investors to consider removing the managing general partner which, on a potential conflict of interest event, could be called solely by our independent directors.

Upon any removal of the managing general partner, holders of a majority-in-interest in the Core Fund (not affiliated with Hines) will elect a successor managing general partner. The successor managing general partner will be entitled to appoint members of the management board to replace those appointed by the removed managing general partner.

We cannot be removed as the non-managing general partner of the Core Fund, except as may be required under applicable law.

Affiliate Transactions

The Core Fund advisory committee must approve all affiliate transactions which are on terms less favorable to the Core Fund than those that would be obtained from an unaffiliated third party, except that transactions specifically contemplated by the Core Fund partnership agreement or certain agreements entered into in connection therewith do not need to be approved by such committee. Additionally, we must approve certain affiliate transactions as the non-managing general partner of the Core Fund, as described above. All such transactions must be approved by our independent directors. Although the other investors in the Core Fund may pay fees to the Core Fund in connection with their investments, we do not pay such fees.

Distributions

The Core Fund distributes cash available for distribution on at least a quarterly basis to the holder of any profits interest and to all partners in respect to their percentage interests. The Core Fund will not make any distributions in kind without the approval of the holders of at least a majority-in-interest in the Core Fund, except for distributions of publicly-traded securities made with the approval of the advisory committee and us, as non-managing general partner.

Liquidity and Redemption Rights

Beginning one year after acquisition of an interest in the Core Fund, a partner may request redemption of all or a portion of such interest at a price equal to the interest’s value based on the net asset value of the Core Fund’s assets. In such event, the Core Fund will attempt to redeem up to 10% of its outstanding interests during any calendar year; provided that the managing general partner may limit redemptions as the result of certain tax and regulatory considerations. To exercise a redemption right, a partner must request that the Core Fund redeem a specific number of units at any time within the last 45 days of any calendar year after the holding period described above. Subject to specified limitations, the managing general partner shall redeem the units specified on or before the last day of the following calen dar year. The Core Fund may use unused capital commitments, proceeds from asset sales, indebtedness or other sources to fund any such redemption. Please see “Risk Factors — Business and Real Estate Risks — We are subject to risks as the result of joint ownership of real estate with other Hines programs and third parties,” and “Risk Factors — Business and Real Estate Risks — If the Core Fund is forced to sell its assets in order to satisfy mandatory redemption requirements, our investment in the Core Fund may be materially adversely affected.”

91

Liquidation

The holders of a majority-in-interest of Fund Investors (including us, but not including the managing general partner or other partners affiliated with Hines) may vote to liquidate the Core Fund. Upon this event, the Core Fund must be liquidated within two years of such vote.

Liability and Indemnification

We will not be liable to the Core Fund or its partners for any act or omission on its part except for any liability arising out of our gross negligence, recklessness, willful misconduct or bad faith, knowing violation of law or material breach of the Core Fund partnership agreement. We shall be indemnified by the Core Fund to the fullest extent permitted by law for any damages arising in connection with acts or omissions taken by us in respect of the affairs of the Core Fund and its subsidiaries, unless such act or omission constitutes gross negligence, recklessness, willful misconduct or bad faith, knowing violation of law or material breach of the Core Fund partnership agreement.

Certain Rights of the Institutional Co-Investors and the Institutional Co-Investor Advisor

Co-Investment Rights

The Institutional Co-Investor Advisor has the right, but not the obligation, on behalf of one or more funds it advises, to co-invest with the Core Fund in connection with each investment made by the Core Fund in an amount equal to at least 20% of the total equity capital to be invested in such investment. The Institutional Co-Investor Advisor also has the right, but not the obligation, on behalf of one or more funds it advises, to co-invest with third-party investors in an amount equal to at least 50% of the co-investment capital sought by the Core Fund from third-party investors for a prospective investment, except in certain cases set forth in the Core Fund Partnership Agreement.

Redemption Right

For each asset in which the Institutional Co-Investors or other funds advised by the Institutional Co-Investor Advisor acquire interests pursuant to the Institutional Co-Investor Advisor’s co-investment rights, the Core Fund must establish a three-year period ending no later than the twelfth anniversary of the date such asset is acquired during which the entity through which the Institutional Co-Investors make their investment will redeem or acquire such Institutional Co-Investors’ interest in such entity at net asset value, unless the Institutional Co-Investor Advisor elects to extend this period. The Institutional Co-Investor Advisor may extend the liquidation period for any investment to a later three-year period by giving notice to the applicable investment vehicle not less than one-year prior to the start of the liquid ation period.

Buy/Sell Right

The Institutional Co-Investor Advisor, on one hand, and the Core Fund, on the other hand, have the right to initiate at any time the purchase and sale of an investment in the Core Fund or interests therein.

Certain Rights of IK US Portfolio Invest GmbH & Co. KG

Certain limited partnerships established by Ideenkapital Financial Engineering AG (“IKFE”) and affiliated entities under the laws of Germany own interests in Hines US Core Office Properties LP (“US Core Properties”), a subsidiary of the Core Fund through which it owns a majority of its investments and through which it expects to acquire all future investments. Each such entity (individually known as an “IK Fund” and collectively the “IK Funds”) has the right to require US Core Properties to redeem, at current value as of the date of redemption, all or a portion of its interest in US Core Properties as of the dates listed below.

92

IK Fund	Committed Capital ($MM)		IK Redemption Date
IK Fund I	$	114.8	December 31, 2014
IK Fund II	$	111.3	December 31, 2016
IK Fund III	$	77.5	December 31, 2017

The Core Fund is obligated to provide US Core Properties with sufficient funds to fulfill US Core Properties’ obligations in respect of the IK Fund redemption rights described above, to the extent sufficient funds are not otherwise available to US Core Properties.

IKFE, the sponsor of the IK Funds, has been granted an exclusive right to raise equity capital from retail investors in Germany for US Core Properties, and it is contemplated that it will organize follow-on funds to the existing IK Funds that would subscribe to interests in US Core Properties with corresponding priority redemption rights. US Core Properties has also agreed to provide information about US Core Properties, the properties in which it has an interest, and the Core Fund to IKFE for use by IKFE in raising such equity capital, and to indemnify IKFE and its affiliates and their respective directors, officers, agents, and employees, to the extent any such person suffers losses due to material misstatements or omissions in the information provided to IKFE.

Our Joint Venture With Affiliates

We have a $28.9 million investment in HCB II River LLC, a joint venture created with HCB Interest II LP, an affiliate of Hines, on June 28, 2007. On July 2, 2007, the joint venture acquired Distribution Park Rio, an industrial property located in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The Property consists of four industrial buildings that were constructed from 2001 through 2007. The buildings contain 693,115 square feet of rentable area that is 100% leased. We own a 50% indirect interest in Distribution Park Rio through our investment in HCB II River LLC.

93

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table shows the number and percentage of our outstanding common shares that were owned as of April 1, 2009 by:

• persons known to us to beneficially own more than 5% of our common shares;

• each director and executive officer; and

• all directors and executive officers as a group.

		Common Shares Beneficially Owned(2)
Name of Beneficial Owner(1)	Position	Number of Common Shares			Percentage of Class
Jeffrey C. Hines	Chairman of the Board		6,215,465.8	(3)		3.08	%
C. Hastings Johnson	Director		14,272.6			*
Charles M. Baughn	Director		14,226.0			*
George A. Davis	Independent Director		13,043.6			*
Thomas A. Hassard	Independent Director		4,376.0			*
Stanley D. Levy	Independent Director		10,446.6			*
Paul B. Murphy Jr.	Independent Director		1,416.4			*
	President and Chief
Charles N. Hazen	Executive Officer		7,131.4			*
Sherri W. Schugart	Chief Financial Officer		3,812.6			*
Frank R. Apollo	Senior Vice President — Finance; Treasurer and Secretary		5,593.4			*
Edmund A. Donaldson	Chief Investment Officer		—			*
Kevin L. McMeans	Asset Management Officer		—			*
Ryan T. Sims	Chief Accounting Officer		—			*
All directors and executive officers as a group			6,289,784.4			3.12	%

____________

• *	Less than 1%
(1)	The address of each person listed is c/o Hines REIT, 2800 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 5000, Houston, Texas 77056-6618.
(2)	For purposes of this table, “beneficial ownership” is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act, pursuant to which a person is deemed to have “beneficial ownership” of shares of our stock that the person has the right to acquire within 60 days. For purposes of computing the percentage of outstanding shares of the our stock held by each person or group of persons named in the table, any shares that such person or persons have the right to acquire within 60 days of April 1, 2008 are deemed to be outstanding, but are not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other persons.
(3)	Includes (i) 1,000 common shares owned directly by Hines REIT Investor, L.P., (ii) 1,106,957.0 OP Units in the Operating Partnership held by Hines 2005 VS I LP and (iii) 5,107,508.8 OP Units, which is the number of OP Units that would represent the percentage interest in the Operating Partnership evidenced by the participation interest in such entity held by HALP Associates Limited Partnership as of April 1, 2008. Limited partners in the Operating Partnership may request repurchase of their OP Units for cash or, at our option, common shares on a one-for-one basis, beginning one year after such OP Units were issued. The holder of the participation interest has the right, subject to certain limitations, to demand the repurchase of the participation interest for cash or, at our option, OP Units.

94

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Potential conflicts of interest exist among us, Hines, the Advisor and other affiliates of Hines, in relation to our existing agreements and how we will operate. Currently, four of our seven directors are independent directors. Our independent directors will act on our behalf in all situations in which a conflict of interest may arise and have a fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of our shareholders. However, we cannot assure you that our independent directors will be able to eliminate these conflicts of interest, or reduce the risks related thereto.

Competitive Activities of Hines and its Affiliates

Hines and its affiliates, including the Advisor, are not prohibited from engaging, directly or indirectly, in any other business or from possessing interests in any other business venture or ventures, including businesses and ventures involved in the acquisition, development, ownership, management, leasing or sale of real estate projects. Hines owns interests in, and manages, many other real estate ventures which have investment objectives similar to our objectives. Hines may organize and/or manage similar programs and ventures in the future. Additionally, Hines, its affiliates and its employees (including our officers and some of our directors) may make substantial profits as the result of investment opportunities allocated to current or future entities affiliated with Hines other than us. Such individuals may therefore face conflicts of interest when allocating investment opportunities among Hines affiliates. Please see “Risk Factors — Potential Conflicts of Interests — Employees of the Advisor and Hines will face conflicts of interest relating to time management and allocation of resources and investment opportunities.”

Description of Certain Other Hines Ventures

Some of the real estate ventures currently operated by Hines have priority rights with respect to certain types of investment opportunities. Below is a description of some of these programs:

• The Core Fund acquires existing office properties in the United States that Hines believes are desirable long-term “core” holdings. The Core Fund generally targets office properties located in central business districts or desirable suburban locations. The Core Fund may acquire a mixed-use property (i.e., a part of the value of the property is attributable to non-office components) so long as at least 70% of the projected net operating income from the property is attributable to office components. In any case, property acquired by the Core Fund cannot have a material hotel or lodging component or involve raw land, unless the fund has a reasonable plan for disposing of such components within 12 months after making the investment.

• Hines U.S. Office Value Added Fund II, L.P. (the “Hines Value Added Fund”) acquires existing office properties, or mixed-use properties (i.e., a part of the value of the property is attributable to non-office components, so long as at least 70% of the projected net operating income from the property is attributable to office components) in the United States where Hines believes it can create value through re-leasing or redevelopment activities, or because the property is located in a market subject to temporary capital or pricing inefficiencies (a “value add asset”).

• National Office Partners Limited Partnership (“NOP”) acquires and develops office properties in the United States, including core and value-add assets.

Investment Opportunity Allocation Procedure

Set forth below is a description of the priority investment rights and investment allocation process currently applicable to us and the Hines sponsored real estate ventures for the types of properties described below. While these are the current procedures for allocating Hines’ investment opportunities for the types of properties described below, Hines may sponsor additional real estate funds or other ventures in the future and, in connection with the creation of such funds or ventures, Hines may revise this allocation procedure. The result of such a revision to the allocation procedure may be to increase the number of parties who have the right to participate in investment opportunities sourced by Hines, thereby reducing the number of investment opportunities available to us. Although a change in this allocation may increase the number of entities which participate with us in an investment allocation process, as long as we have capital available for investment and are actively seeking new investments, Hines will not grant rights to new real estate funds, ventures or investors that are superior to our rights to such opportunities. However, Hines may grant rights to new real estate funds, ventures or programs that are equal to our rights, and investment opportunities sourced by Hines will be allocated between us and any such fund, venture or investor on a rotating basis. In addition, Hines may grant priority investment allocation rights to any successor funds or programs that have comparable investment strategies to those funds or ventures described in the section entitled “— Description of Certain Other Hines Ventures” above.

95

Type of Property	Allocation Procedure
An existing office property located in the United States that Hines determines in its discretion is a “core asset”	If the office property is not located in Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, Utah, Hawaii, New Mexico, southern California (Los Angeles and San Diego) or northern and central Texas (Dallas and Austin), then the investment opportunity will be presented to NOP and the Core Fund. If NOP and the Core Fund elect to not acquire the property, then we will have the right to acquire the property if we so choose. In the event both NOP and the Core Fund wish to pursue investment opportunities, such opportunities will be allocated between the two entities on a rotating basis. If the office property is located in Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, Utah, Hawaii, New Mexico, southern California (Los Angeles and San Diego) or northern and central Texas (Dallas and Austin), then the Core Fund will have the first right to acquire the property. If the Core Fund elects to not acquire the property, the investment opportunity will be presented to us and NOP. In the event both we and NOP wish to pursue investment opportunities, such opportunities will be allocated between us and NOP on a rotating basis.
An existing office property located in the United States that Hines determines in its discretion is a “value add asset”	If the office property is not located in Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, Utah, Hawaii, New Mexico, southern California (Los Angeles and San Diego) or northern and central Texas (Dallas and Austin), then the investment opportunity will be presented to NOP and the Hines Value Added Fund. If NOP and the Hines Value Added Fund elect to not acquire the property, then we will have the right to acquire the property if we so choose. In the event both NOP and the Hines Value Added Fund wish to pursue investment opportunities, such opportunities will be allocated between the two entities on a rotating basis.
	If the office property is located in Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, Utah, Hawaii, New Mexico, southern California (Los Angeles and San Diego) or northern and central Texas (Dallas and Austin), then the Hines Value Added Fund will have the first right to acquire the property. If the Hines Value Added Fund elects to not acquire the property, the investment opportunity will be presented to us and NOP. In the event both we and NOP wish to pursue investment opportunities, such opportunities will be allocated between us and NOP on a rotating basis.

Our right to participate in the investment allocation process described in this section will terminate once we have fully invested the proceeds of this offering or if we are no longer advised by an affiliate of Hines, and this right and process may be amended sooner with the approval of our independent directors. Please see “Risk Factors — Potential Conflicts of Interest Risks — We compete with affiliates of Hines for real estate investment opportunities. Some of these affiliates have preferential rights to accept or reject certain investment opportunities in advance of our right to accept or reject such opportunities. Many of the preferential rights we have to accept or reject investment opportunities are subordinate to the preferential rights of at least one affiliate of Hines.”

96

Except as described above, we have no specific rights to invest in any other investment opportunities identified by, sourced by or participated in by Hines or affiliates of Hines including, but not limited to, international, development and non-office investment opportunities. Our Advisor is obligated by our advisory agreement to locate investment opportunities to offer to us and our Advisor has access to the Hines organization to locate such opportunities. However, Hines’ ability to offer some investment opportunities to us is limited by contractual obligations Hines has, or may have in the future, to other real estate programs sponsored by Hines not summarized above.

If the Core Fund accepts an investment opportunity, we will participate in that investment indirectly through our investment in the Core Fund. Additionally, as long as we are a non-managing general partner of the Core Fund, the Core Fund must provide us written notice of any capital call issued by the Core Fund. We have the right to increase our non-managing general partner interest in an amount up to 40% of any future capital calls made by the Core Fund. In the event that an affiliate of Hines is no longer our advisor, our right to acquire up to this additional interest in the Core Fund will terminate. If we exercise this 40% right or otherwise make a capital commitment, we will be bound to contribute capital in accordance with the terms of such commitment. We have no assurance that our board of directors will approve other investment s in the Core Fund. This right to participate in future Core Fund capital calls may be amended or terminated with the approval of our independent directors.

While the investment strategies of some of the investment vehicles described above are different, the decision of how any potential investment should be characterized may, in many cases, be a matter of subjective judgment which will be made by Hines’ investment allocation committee. This committee currently consists of the following four individuals: Jeffrey C. Hines, C. Hastings Johnson, Charles M. Baughn and Thomas D. Owens. If an investment opportunity is determined to fall within the priority rights of more than one investment fund or program, and more than one fund expresses an interest in pursuing such opportunity, the investment will be allocated between such funds on a rotating basis. Additionally, certain types of investment opportunities, which may include core assets, may not enter the allocation process because of spe cial or unique circumstances related to the asset or the seller of the asset that in the judgment of the investment allocation committee do not fall within the priority rights of any investor. In these cases, the investment may be made by a Hines-sponsored fund or program without us having an opportunity to make such investment.

Competitive Activities of Our Officers and Directors, the Advisor and Other Hines Affiliates

Our officers and some of our directors, the officers and directors of the Advisor and employees of Hines will not devote their efforts full-time to our operations or the management of our properties, but may devote a material amount of their time to the management of the business of other property-owning entities controlled or operated by Hines, but otherwise unaffiliated with us. In some cases, these entities own properties which are located in the same geographical area as, and directly compete with, our properties. Members of our management also conduct the operations of the Core Fund, Hines Global and other Hines affiliates. Circumstances may arise when the interests of third party investors in the Core Fund, Hines Global and other Hines affiliates may differ from our interests and our management will face conflicts of interest whe n dealing with such circumstances. Likewise, our management face conflicts of interest when allocating time and resources between our operations and the operations of the Core Fund, Hines Global and other Hines affiliates.

In allocating employees and services among, and in soliciting business for, properties owned by other entities affiliated with Hines, Hines may face conflicts of interest including the fact that Hines, its affiliates, and its employees, including our officers and some of our directors, may receive greater compensation from other investment opportunities than they could from investment opportunities allocated to us. We may also compete with other entities affiliated with Hines for tenants and Hines may face conflicts of interest in seeking tenants for our properties while seeking tenants for properties owned or managed by other Hines affiliates. The Advisor also may be in a conflict of interest position upon a potential sale of our properties as well as in locating new tenants for available space and/or negotiating with current tenants to renew expiring leases. Please see “Risk Factors — Potential Conflicts of Interest Risks.”

97

Fees and Other Compensation Payable to Hines and its Affiliates

We pay Hines and its affiliates substantial fees in relation to this offering and our operations, which could be increased or decreased during or after this offering. Please see “Management Compensation, Expense Reimbursements and Operating Partnership Participation Interest.” We expect to purchase properties in which Hines, its affiliates and its employees (including our officers and directors) directly or indirectly have an interest. We may also purchase properties developed by Hines and provide development loans in connection with such developments.

On April 24, 2006, we acquired 321 North Clark for approximately $247.3 million, excluding transaction costs, financing fees and working capital reserves. The seller, 321 North Clark Realty LLC, was a joint venture between an affiliate of Hines and an institution advised by JP Morgan Chase. The Hines affiliate owned a 5% equity interest in the seller and controlled its day-to-day operations. Through its affiliate, Hines received a promoted share of approximately $8.2 million of the proceeds from the sale based on the return achieved in connection with the closing in addition to its 5% share of net sale proceeds. The promoted share Hines received did not affect the purchase price for $247.3 million and was reviewed and approved by the conflicts committee of our board of directors.

On December 15, 2008, we acquired Distribution Parks Araucaria, Louveira and Vinhedo for approximately $114.9 million (translated from $269.9 million BRL as of the acquisition date), excluding transaction costs, financing fees and working capital reserves. The sellers, HCB Interests LP and Hines HCB Partners LP, are subsidiaries of a joint venture between an affiliate of Hines and the California Public Employees’ Retirement System. Through the joint venture, the Hines affiliate owned a 5% equity interest in the sellers and controlled the joint venture’s day-to-day operations. Through its affiliate, Hines received a 5% share of the net sale proceeds. The share Hines received did not affect the purchase price of $114.9 million, which was reviewed and approved by the conflicts committee of our board of dire ctors.

Our acquisitions of 321 North Clark and Distribution Parks Araucaria, Louveira and Vinhedo were, and any other such transactions will be, consummated in accordance with the conflict of interest policies set forth in this prospectus or otherwise in effect at that time. Please see “— Certain Conflict Resolution Procedures” below. The Core Fund may also acquire properties from entities affiliated with Hines. For example, the Shell Buildings and Three First National Plaza were acquired by the Core Fund from sellers affiliated with Hines. Please see “Our Real Estate Investments — Purpose and Structure of the Core Fund.” Hines, its affiliates and its employees (including our officers and some of our directors) may make substantial profits in connection with such transactions.

Joint Venture Conflicts of Interest

We have invested and may continue to invest in properties and assets jointly with other Hines’ programs, such as the Core Fund, as well as third parties. We may acquire, develop or otherwise invest in properties and assets through corporations, limited liability companies, joint ventures or partnerships, co-tenancies or other co-ownership arrangements with Hines, Hines affiliates or third parties. For example, we acquired Distribution Park Rio, an industrial property located in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, through a joint venture with another affiliate of Hines. Joint ownership of properties, under certain circumstances, may involve conflicts of interest. Examples of these conflicts include:

• such partners or co-investors might have economic or other business interests or goals that are inconsistent with our business interests or goals, including goals relating to the financing, management, operation, leasing or sale of properties held in the joint venture or the timing of the termination and liquidation of the venture;

• such partners or co-investors may be in a position to take action contrary to our instructions, requests, policies or objectives, including our policy with respect to maintaining our qualification as a REIT;

• under joint venture or other co-investment arrangements, neither co-venturer may have the power to control the venture and, under certain circumstances, an impasse could result and this impasse could have an adverse impact on the joint venture, which could adversely impact the operations and profitability of the joint venture and/or the amount and timing of distributions we receive from such joint venture; and

98

• under joint venture or other co-investment arrangements, each venture partner may have a buy/sell right and, as the result of the exercise of such a right by a co-venturer, we may be forced to sell our interest, or buy a co-venturer’s interest, at a time when it would not otherwise be in our best interest to do so. Please see “Risk Factors — Business and Real Estate Risks — We are subject to risks as the result of joint ownership of real estate with Hines programs and third parties.”

Affiliated Dealer Manager and Property Manager

Because our Dealer Manager is an affiliate of Hines, you will not have the benefit of an independent due diligence review and investigation of the type normally performed by an unaffiliated, independent underwriter in connection with an offering of securities. Please see “Risk Factors — Investment Risks — You will not have the benefit of an independent due diligence review in connection with this offering and, if a conflict of interest arises between us and Hines, we may incur additional fees and expenses. “ In addition, our Dealer Manager also serves as the placement agent for other Hines-sponsored investment vehicles which include both public vehicles, such as Hines Global, and private investment funds.

Hines manages many of the properties we own, as well as all of the Core Fund’s properties. We expect that Hines will manage most, if not all, future properties acquired by us or the Core Fund.

No Arm’s-Length Agreements

All agreements, contracts or arrangements between or among Hines and its affiliates, including the Advisor, and us were not negotiated at arm’s-length. Such agreements include the Advisory Agreement, the Dealer Manager Agreement, the Property Management and Leasing Agreement, our charter, and the Operating Partnership’s partnership agreement. The policies with respect to conflicts of interest described herein were designed to lessen the effect of potential conflicts that arise from such relationships. However, we cannot assure you that these policies will eliminate the conflicts of interest or reduce the risks related thereto. The conflicts committee of our board of directors must also approve all conflict-of-interest and related party transactions. Please see the “Investment Objectives and Policies with Respect to Ce rtain Activities — Acquisition and Investment Policies — Affiliate Transaction Policy” section of this prospectus.

Lack of Separate Representation

Hines REIT, the Operating Partnership, the Dealer Manager, the Advisor, Hines and their affiliates may be represented by the same legal counsel and may retain the same accountants and other experts. In this regard, Greenberg Traurig, LLP represents Hines REIT and is providing services to certain of its affiliates including the Operating Partnership, the Dealer Manager, the Advisor and Hines Global. No counsel, underwriter, or other person has been retained to represent potential investors in connection with this offering.

Additional Conflicts of Interest

We, our Advisor and its affiliates will also potentially be in conflict of interest positions as to various other matters in our day-to-day operations, including matters related to the:

• computation of compensation, expense reimbursements, interests, distributions, and other payments under the Operating Partnership’s partnership agreement, our charter, the Advisory Agreement, the Property Management and Leasing Agreements and the Dealer Manager Agreement;

• enforcement or termination of the Operating Partnership’s partnership agreement, our charter, the Advisory Agreement, the Property Management and Leasing Agreements and the Dealer Manager Agreement;

• order and priority in which we pay the obligations of the Operating Partnership, including amounts guaranteed by or due to the Advisor, Hines or its affiliates;

99

• order and priority in which we pay amounts owed to third parties as opposed to amounts owed to Hines or the Advisor;

• determination of whether to sell properties and acquire additional properties (as to which acquisitions, the Advisor might receive additional fees and as to which sales, the Advisor might lose fees, such as property management fees);

• timing, amount and manner in which we finance or refinance any indebtedness (as to which arrangements, the Advisor might receive additional fees); and

• extent to which we repay or refinance the indebtedness which is recourse to Hines, if any, prior to nonrecourse indebtedness and the terms of any such refinancing, if applicable.

Certain Conflict Resolution Procedures

In order to reduce the effect on the Company of certain potential conflicts of interest, the Advisory Agreement and our charter contain a number of restrictions relating to transactions we enter into with Hines and its affiliates. These restrictions include, among others, the following:

• Except as otherwise described in this prospectus, we will not accept goods or services from Hines or its affiliates unless a majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors, not otherwise interested in the transaction approve such transactions as fair and reasonable to us and on terms and conditions not less favorable to us than those available from unaffiliated third parties for comparable goods or services.

• We will not purchase or lease a property in which Hines or its affiliates has an interest without a determination by a majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors, not otherwise interested in the transaction that the transaction is competitive and commercially reasonable to us and at a price no greater than the cost of the property to Hines or its affiliates, unless there is substantial justification for any amount that exceeds such cost and such excess amount is determined to be reasonable and appropriate disclosure is made with respect to the transaction. In all cases where assets are acquired from Hines or one of its affiliates, the fair market value of such assets will be determined by an independent expert selected by our independent directors. In no event will we acquire any property from Hines or its affiliates at a price that exceeds the appraised value of the property; p rovided that in the case of a development, redevelopment or refurbishment project that we agree to acquire prior to completion of the project, the appraised value will be based upon the completed value of the project as determined at the time the agreement to purchase the property is entered into. We will not sell or lease a property to Hines or its affiliates or to our directors unless a majority of our directors, including a majority of the directors not otherwise interested in the transaction, determine the transaction is fair and reasonable to us. Even following these procedures, Hines, its affiliates and employees (including our officers and directors) may make substantial profits in connection with acquisition of properties from Hines-affiliated entities.

• We will not enter into joint ventures with affiliates of Hines, such as acquiring interests in the Core Fund, unless a majority of our independent directors approves such transaction as being fair and reasonable to us and determines that our investment is on terms substantially similar to the terms of third parties making comparable investments.

• We will not make any loan to Hines, its affiliates or our directors, except in the case of loans to our subsidiaries and mortgage loans in which an independent expert has appraised the underlying property. Any loans to us by Hines, its affiliates or our directors must be approved by a majority of our directors, including a majority of the directors not otherwise interested in the transaction, as fair, competitive and commercially reasonable, and on terms no less favorable to us than comparable loans between unaffiliated parties.

• Hines and its affiliates will be entitled to reimbursement, at cost, for actual expenses incurred by them on behalf of us or joint ventures in which we are a joint venture partner, subject to the limitation on reimbursement of operating expenses to the extent that they exceed the greater of 2% of our average invested assets or 25% of our net income, as described in the “Management — The Advisor and the Advisory Agreement — Reimbursements by the Advisor” section of this prospectus.

Despite these restrictions, conflicts of interest may be detrimental to your investment.

100

INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN ACTIVITIES

The following is a discussion of our current objectives and policies with respect to investments, borrowing, affiliate transactions, equity capital and certain other activities. All of these objectives and policies have been established in our governance documents or by our management and may be amended or revised from time to time (and at any time) by our management or board of directors, except for policies contained in our charter, which may only be modified with a vote or the approval of our shareholders. We cannot assure you that our policies or investment objectives will be attained or that the value of our common shares will not decrease.

Decisions relating to our investments will be made by our Advisor, subject to approval by our board of directors. Please see “Management — Our Officers and Directors” and “Management — Hines and Our Property Management and Leasing Agreements — The Hines Organization — General” for a description of the background and experience of our directors and executive officers.

Primary Investment Objectives

Our primary investment objectives are to:

• preserve invested capital;

• invest in a diversified portfolio of office properties;

• pay regular cash dividends;

• achieve appreciation of our assets over the long term; and

• remain qualified as a real estate investment trust, or “REIT,” for federal income tax purposes.

We cannot assure you that we will attain these objectives. We also cannot change our primary investment objectives without the approval of our shareholders.

Acquisition and Investment Policies

We invest primarily in institutional-quality office properties located throughout the United States. We believe that there is an ongoing opportunity to create stable cash returns and attractive total returns by employing a strategy of investing primarily in a diversified portfolio of office properties over the long term. We believe that this strategy can help create stable cash flow and capital appreciation potential if the office portfolio is well-selected and well-diversified in number and location of properties, and the office properties are consistently well-managed. These types of properties are generally located in central business districts or suburban markets of major metropolitan cities. Our principal targeted assets are office properties that have quality construction, desirable locations and quality tenants. We intend to con tinue to invest in a geographically diverse portfolio in order to reduce the risk of reliance on a particular market, a particular property and/or a particular tenant. In addition, we invest in other real estate investments including, but not limited to, properties outside of the United States, non-office properties, loans and ground leases.

As of December 31, 2008, we also owned Atrium on Bay, a mixed-use office and retail complex in Toronto, Canada, 4050/4055 Corporate Drive, an industrial property in Dallas, Texas, direct or indirect interests in four industrial properties in Brazil and a 70% interest in a portfolio of eight grocery-anchored shopping centers. We believe there are also significant opportunities for real estate investments that currently exist in other markets outside of the United States. Some of this real estate is located in developed markets such as the United Kingdom, Germany and France, while other real estate investment opportunities are located in emerging or maturing markets such as Brazil, Mexico, Russia and China. We believe that investing in international properties that meet our investment policies and objectives could provide additional diversification and enhanced investment returns to our real estate portfolio.

101

We may continue to invest in real estate directly by owning 100% of such assets or indirectly by owning less than 100% of such assets through investments with other investors or joint venture partners, including other Hines-affiliated entities, such as the Core Fund. We anticipate that we will fund our future acquisitions primarily with proceeds raised in this offering and potential follow-on offerings, as well as with proceeds from debt financings. All of our investment decisions are subject to the approval of a majority of our board of directors, and specifically a majority of our independent directors if an investment involves a transaction with Hines or any of its affiliates.

We will seek to invest in properties that will satisfy the primary objectives of preserving invested capital and providing cash dividends to our shareholders. However, because a significant factor in the valuation of income-producing real property is its potential for future appreciation, we anticipate that some properties we acquire may have both the potential for growth in value and for providing cash dividends to our shareholders. We intend to invest in a portfolio of properties which is diversified by location, lease expirations and tenant industries. Even if we are able to achieve this diversification objective, we expect that it may take a long time to achieve. Please see “Risk Factors — Investment Risks — This offering is being conducted on a “best efforts” basis, and the risk that we will not be able to accomplish our business objectives will increase if only a small number of our shares are purchased in this offering.”

We have bought and expect to buy additional assets with the proceeds of this offering that we believe have some of the following attributes:

Preferred Location.  We believe that location often has the single greatest impact on an asset’s long-term income-producing potential and that assets located in the preferred submarkets in metropolitan areas and situated at preferred locations within such submarkets have the potential to be long-term assets.

Premium Buildings.  We will seek to acquire assets that generally have design and physical attributes (e.g., quality construction and materials, systems, floorplates, etc.) that are more attractive to a user than those of inferior properties. Such assets over the long term may attract and retain a greater number of desirable tenants in the marketplace.

Quality Tenancy.  We will seek to acquire assets that typically attract tenants with better credit who require larger blocks of space because these larger tenants generally require longer term leases in order to accommodate their current and future space needs without undergoing disruptive and costly relocations. Such tenants may make significant tenant improvements to their spaces, and thus may be more likely to renew their leases prior to expiration.

We believe that following an acquisition, the additional component of proactive property management and leasing is the fourth critical element necessary to achieve attractive long-term investment returns for investors. Actively anticipating and quickly responding to tenant comfort and cleaning needs are examples of areas where proactive property management may make the difference in a tenant’s occupancy experience, increasing its desire to remain a tenant and thereby providing a higher tenant retention rate, which over the long term may result in better financial performance of the property.

However, our Advisor may not be able to locate properties with all, or a significant number, of these attributes and even if the Advisor is able to locate properties with these attributes, the properties may still perform poorly. Please see “Risk Factors — Business and Real Estate Risks” and “Risk Factors — Potential Conflicts of Interest Risks.”

Although we are not limited as to the form our investments may take, our investments in real estate will generally take the form of holding fee title or long-term ground leases in the properties we acquire, owning interests in investment vehicles sponsored by Hines or acquiring interests in joint ventures or similar entities that own and operate real estate. We expect to continue to acquire such interests through the Operating Partnership. Please see “The Operating Partnership.” The Operating Partnership may hold real estate indirectly by acquiring interests in properties through limited liability companies and limited partnerships, or through investments in joint ventures, partnerships, co-tenancies or other co-ownership arrangements with other owners of properties, affiliates of Hines or other persons. Please see “R isk Factors — Business and Real Estate Risks — We are subject to risks as the result of joint ownership of real estate with other Hines programs and third parties.” We may hold our investments in joint ventures or other entities in the form of equity securities, debt or general partner interests. Please see “— Joint Venture Investments” below. If we invest in a partnership as a general partner, we may acquire non-managing general partner interests, as in the case with our non-managing general partner interest in the Core Fund. Please see “Risk Factors — Business and Real Estate Risks — If we invest in a limited partnership as a general partner, we could be responsible for all liabilities of such partnership.”

102

We are not limited as to the geographic area where we may conduct our operations. We are not specifically limited in the number or size of properties we may acquire, or on the percentage of net proceeds of this offering that we may invest in a single property. The number and mix of properties we acquire will depend upon real estate and market conditions and other circumstances existing at the time we are acquiring our properties and the amount of proceeds we raise in this offering.

In seeking investment opportunities for us, our Advisor will consider relevant real estate and financial factors including the creditworthiness of major tenants, the leases and other agreements affecting the property, the location of the property, its income-producing capacity, its prospects for long-term appreciation and liquidity and tax considerations. In this regard, our Advisor will have substantial discretion with respect to the selection of specific investments, subject to board approval. In determining whether to purchase a particular property, we may obtain an option on such property. The amount paid for an option, if any, is normally surrendered if the property is not purchased and may or may not be credited against the purchase price if the property is purchased.

Our obligation to close the purchase of any investment will generally be conditioned upon the delivery and verification of certain documents from the seller or developer, including, where available and appropriate:

• plans, specifications and surveys;

• environmental reports;

• evidence of marketable title, subject to such liens and encumbrances as are acceptable to the Advisor, as well as title and other insurance policies; and

• financial information relating to the property, including the recent operating histories of properties that have operating histories.

We may invest in properties which have been developed, are being developed or are to be developed by Hines or a Hines affiliate. We may acquire a property that has been developed by Hines or a Hines affiliate and we may contract to acquire a property under development, or to be developed, by Hines or a Hines affiliate at a pre-determined purchase price. All such transactions or investments will be approved by a majority of our independent directors as described in “Conflicts of Interest — Certain Conflict Resolution Procedures” and generally may not be acquired by us for a value, at the time the transaction was entered into, in excess of the appraised fair market value of such investment. Subject to this limitation, Hines, its affiliates and its employees (including our officers and directors) may make substantia l profits in connection with any such development investment and our cost to acquire the property may be in excess of the cost that would have been incurred by us if we had developed the property. Please see “Risk Factors — Business and Real Estate Risks — We are subject to risks as the result of joint ownership of real estate with other Hines programs and third parties” and “Conflicts of Interest — Joint Venture Conflicts of Interest” such as our interest.

International Investments

According to Prudential Real Estate Investors, approximately two-thirds of global real estate available for investment is located outside of the United States. Some of this real estate is located in developed markets such as the United Kingdom, Germany and France. These real estate markets are well-developed and have been integrated into the global capital markets for some time. Other real estate investments are located in maturing markets in countries that either have less advanced capital markets or are surrounded by emerging or higher risk markets. We believe examples of maturing markets include Russia and China. Finally, there are other potential real estate opportunities in emerging markets such as Brazil and Mexico. Although these markets have a higher degree of market risk, they also offer higher potential returns.

103

Our portfolio includes five international properties. We directly own Atrium on Bay, a mixed-use office and retail property in Toronto, Ontario and Distribution Parks Araucaria, Louveira, and Vinhedo, industrial properties in Brazil, and indirectly own a 50% interest, through a joint venture with an affiliate of Hines, in Distribution Park Rio, another industrial property in Brazil.

We believe that international properties may play a more important role in well-diversified real estate portfolios in the future and that a meaningful allocation to international properties that meet our investment policies and objectives could be an effective tool we could use to create a well-diversified portfolio. International investment diversification may involve diversity in regard to property types as well as market types. Additionally, we believe that acquiring international properties during periods in which investors are spending significant capital to acquire properties in the United States may allow us to more successfully make investments that are accretive to our cash flow available for distributions.

However, international investments involve unique risks. In addition to risks associated with real estate investments generally, regardless of location, country-specific risks and currency risks add an additional layer of factors that must be considered when investing in non-U.S. real estate. We believe that having access to Hines’ international organization, with regional offices in 16 foreign countries and real estate professionals living and working full time in these international markets, will be a valuable resource to us when considering international opportunities. As of December 31, 2008, Hines had offices in the United Kingdom, France, Spain, Mexico, Poland, Germany, Brazil, Italy, China, Canada, Russia, Panama, Luxembourg, United Arab Emirates, India and Turkey. Hines has acquired, developed, or redeveloped ov er 115 projects outside of the United States in the 10 year period ended December 31, 2008 with an aggregate cost of approximately $9.5 billion. A majority of these projects are located in maturing or emerging markets. Our Advisor has access to Hines’ international organization, and we expect to consider interests in non-U.S. markets as the size of our portfolio increases, including opportunities in maturing or emerging markets. However, we cannot assure investors that we will be able to successfully manage the various risks associated with, and unique to, investing in foreign markets.

Joint Venture Investments

We have entered into, and may continue to enter into joint ventures with third parties or Hines affiliates, such as our interest in the Core Fund and the joint venture that owns Distribution Park Rio. We may also enter into joint ventures, partnerships, co-tenancies and other co-ownership arrangements or participations with real estate developers, owners and other affiliated or non-affiliated third parties for the purpose of owning and/or operating real properties. Our investment may be in the form of equity or debt. In determining whether to invest in a particular joint venture, the Advisor will evaluate the real property that such joint venture owns or is being formed to own under the same criteria described elsewhere in this prospectus for the selection of our real estate property investments.

We will enter into joint ventures with Hines affiliates for the acquisition of properties only if:

• a majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors not otherwise interested in the transaction, approve the transaction as being fair and reasonable to us; and

• the investment by us and other third-party investors making comparable investments in the joint venture are on substantially the same terms and conditions.

Our entering into joint ventures with other Hines affiliates will result in certain conflicts of interest. Please see “Conflicts of Interest — Joint Venture Conflicts of Interest” and “Conflicts of Interest — Competitive Activities of our Officers and Directors, the Advisor and Other Hines Affiliates.” Please also see “Risk Factors — Business and Real Estate Risks — We are subject to risks as the result of joint ownership of real estate with other Hines programs and third parties” and “Risk Factors — Business and Real Estate Risks — If the Core Fund is forced to sell its assets in order to satisfy mandatory redemption requirements, our investments in the Core Fund may be materially adversely affected.” Management may determ ine that increasing our indirect investment in the Core Fund or investing in another Hines affiliates will provide benefits to our investors because it will allow us to diversify our portfolio of properties at a faster rate than we could obtain by investing directly, which may reduce risks to investors in the Company. Likewise, such investments may provide us with access to real estate investments with benefits not available to us for direct investments, or are otherwise in the best interest of our shareholders. We do not expect that we will incur additional costs of any significance associated with increasing our indirect investments made through the Core Fund compared to acquiring interests in real estate directly.

104

We have not established safeguards we will apply to, or be required in, our potential joint ventures. Particular safeguards we will require in joint ventures will be determined on a case-by-case basis after our management and/or board of directors consider all facts they feel are relevant, such as the nature and attributes of our other potential joint venture partners, the proposed structure of the joint venture, the nature of the operations, liabilities and/or assets the joint venture may conduct and/or own, and the proportion of the size of our interest when compared to the interests owned by other parties. We expect to consider specific safeguards to address potential consequences relating to:

• The management of the joint venture, such as obtaining certain approval rights in joint ventures we do not control or providing for procedures to address decisions in the event of an impasse if we share control of the joint venture.

• Our ability to exit a joint venture, such as requiring buy/sell rights, redemption rights or forced liquidation under certain circumstances.

• Our ability to control transfers of interests held by other parties in the joint venture, such as requiring consent, right of first refusal or forced redemption rights in connection with transfers.

Borrowing Policies

We may incur indebtedness in the form of bank borrowings, purchase money obligations to the sellers of properties and publicly or privately placed debt instruments or financing from institutional investors or other lenders. Our indebtedness may be unsecured or may be secured by mortgages or other interests in our properties, or may be limited to the particular property to which the indebtedness relates. We may use borrowing proceeds to finance acquisitions of new properties, make payments to our Advisor, to pay for capital improvements, repairs or tenant buildouts, to refinance existing indebtedness, to pay dividends, to fund redemptions of our shares or to provide working capital. The form of our indebtedness may be long-term or short-term debt or in the form of a revolving credit facility. Please see “Our Real Estate Investment s” for a description of our current debt.

Financing Strategy and Policies

We expect that once we have fully invested the proceeds of this offering and other potential follow-on offerings, our debt financing, or the debt financing of entities in which we invest, will be in the range of approximately 40%-60% of the aggregate value of our real estate investments. Financing for future acquisitions and investments may be obtained at the time an asset is acquired or an investment is made or at such later time as determined to be appropriate. In addition, debt financing may be used from time to time for property improvements, lease inducements, tenant improvements and other working capital needs. Additionally, the amount of debt placed on an individual property, or the amount of debt incurred by an individual entity in which we invest, may be less than 40% or more than 60% of the value of such property or the value of the assets owned by such entity, depending on market conditions and other factors. Our aggregate borrowings, secured and unsecured, must be reasonable in relation to our net assets and must be reviewed by our board of directors at least quarterly. Our charter limits our borrowing to 300% of our net assets (approximates 75% of the cost of our assets) unless any excess borrowing is approved by a majority of our independent directors and is disclosed to our shareholders in our next quarterly report along with justification for the excess. Notwithstanding the above, depending on market conditions and other factors, we may choose not to place debt on our portfolio or our assets and may choose not to borrow to finance our operations or to acquire properties.

105

We had debt financing in an amount equal to approximately 55% of the estimated value of our direct and indirect real estate investments as of December 31, 2008, consisting primarily of outstanding loans under our revolving credit facility and secured mortgage financings. The Core Fund, in which we have invested, had debt financing in an amount equal to approximately 58% of the estimated value of its real estate investments as of December 31, 2008, consisting primarily of secured mortgage financings.

Our financing strategy and policies do not eliminate or reduce the risks inherent in using leverage to purchase properties. Please see “Risk Factors — Business and Real Estate Risks — Our use of borrowings to partially fund acquisitions and improvements on properties could result in foreclosures and unexpected debt service expenses upon refinancing, both of which could have an adverse impact on our operations and cash flow.”

By operating on a leveraged basis, we will have more funds available for investment in properties. We believe the prudent use of favorably-priced debt may allow us to make more investments than would otherwise be possible, resulting in a more diversified portfolio. To the extent that we do not obtain mortgage loans on our properties, our ability to acquire additional properties may be restricted. Lenders may have recourse to assets not securing the repayment of the indebtedness.

We will refinance properties during the term of a loan only in limited circumstances, such as when a decline in interest rates makes it beneficial to prepay an existing mortgage, when an existing mortgage matures or if an attractive investment becomes available and the proceeds from the refinancing can be used to purchase such investment. The benefits of the refinancing may include increased cash flow resulting from reduced debt service requirements, increased distributions resulting from proceeds of the refinancing, if any, and increased property ownership if some refinancing proceeds are reinvested in real estate.

It is our policy generally not to enter into interest rate swap or cap transactions, hedging arrangements or similar transactions for speculative purposes. However, because we are exposed to the effects of interest rate changes, for example as a result of variable interest rate debt we may hold, we have entered into and may in the future enter into interest rate swaps and caps, or similar hedging or derivative transactions or arrangements, in order to manage or mitigate our interest rate risk on variable rate debt.

We may borrow amounts from Hines or its affiliates only if such loan is approved by a majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors not otherwise interested in the transaction, as fair, competitive, commercially reasonable and no less favorable to us than comparable loans between unaffiliated parties under the circumstances.

Except as set forth in our charter regarding debt limits, we may reevaluate and change our debt policy in the future without a shareholder vote. Factors that we would consider when reevaluating or changing our debt policy include then-current economic conditions, the relative cost of debt and equity capital, any acquisition opportunities, the ability of our properties to generate sufficient cash flow to cover debt service requirements and other similar factors. Further, we may increase or decrease our ratio of debt to book value in connection with any change of our borrowing policies.

Disposition Policies

We generally intend to hold each property we acquire for an extended period, and we have no present intention to sell any of our properties or other real estate investments. However, we may sell a property at any time if, in our judgment, the sale of the property is in the best interests of our shareholders. Additionally, ventures in which we have an interest may be forced to sell assets to satisfy mandatory redemptions of other investors. Please see “Risk Factors — Business and Real Estate Risks — If the Core Fund is forced to sell its assets in order to satisfy mandatory redemption requirements, our investment in the Core Fund may be materially adversely affected.” We may sell properties to fund redemptions under our share redemption program.

The determination of whether a particular property should be sold or otherwise disposed of will generally be made after consideration of relevant factors, including prevailing economic conditions, other investment opportunities and considerations specific to the condition, value and financial performance of the property. In connection with our sales of properties, we may lend the purchaser all or a portion of the purchase price. In these instances, our taxable income may exceed the cash received in the sale.

106

We may sell assets to third parties or to affiliates of Hines. All transactions with affiliates of Hines will be completed in accordance with our conflict of interest policies. Please see “Conflicts of Interest — Certain Conflict Resolution Procedures.”

Investment Limitations

Our charter places numerous limitations on us with respect to the manner in which we may invest our funds. These limitations cannot be changed unless our charter is amended, which requires the approval of our shareholders. Unless our charter is amended, we may not:

• Invest in equity securities unless a majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors, not otherwise interested in the transaction approve such investment as being fair, competitive and commercially reasonable.

• Invest in commodities or commodity futures contracts, except for futures contracts when used solely for the purpose of hedging in connection with our ordinary business of investing in real estate assets and mortgages.

• Invest in real estate contracts of sale, otherwise known as land sale contracts, unless the contract is in recordable form and is appropriately recorded in the chain of title.

• Make or invest in mortgage loans unless an appraisal is obtained concerning the underlying property, except for those mortgage loans insured or guaranteed by a government or government agency. In cases where a majority of our independent directors determines, and in all cases in which the transaction is with any of our directors or Hines and its affiliates, we will obtain an appraisal from an independent appraiser.

• Make or invest in mortgage loans, including construction loans, on any one property if the aggregate amount of all mortgage loans on such property would exceed an amount equal to 85% of the appraised value of such property, as determined by an appraisal, unless substantial justification exists for exceeding such limit because of the presence of other loan underwriting criteria.

• Make or invest in mortgage loans that are subordinate to any mortgage or equity interest of any of our directors, Hines or their respective affiliates.

• Invest in junior debt secured by a mortgage on real property which is subordinate to the lien or other senior debt except where the amount of such junior debt plus any senior debt does not exceed 90% of the appraised value of such property, if after giving effect thereto, the value of all such mortgage loans would not then exceed 25% of our net assets, which means our total assets less our total liabilities.

• Make investments in unimproved property or indebtedness secured by a deed of trust or mortgage loans on unimproved property in excess of 10% of our total assets.

• Issue equity securities on a deferred payment basis or other similar arrangement.

• Issue debt securities in the absence of adequate cash flow to cover debt service.

• Issue equity securities which are non-voting or assessable.

• Issue “redeemable securities,” as defined in Section 2(a)(32) of the Investment Company Act.

• When applicable, grant warrants or options to purchase shares to Hines or its affiliates or to officers or directors affiliated with Hines except on the same terms as the options or warrants that are sold to the general public. Further, the amount of the options or warrants cannot exceed an amount equal to 10% of outstanding shares on the date of grant of the warrants and options.

107

• Engage in securities trading, as compared with real estate activities, or engage in the business of loan underwriting or the agency distribution of securities issued by other persons.

• Lend money to our directors, or to Hines or its affiliates, except for certain mortgage loans described above.

If we become an investment company, we might be required to revise some of these policies to comply with the Investment Company Act. This would require us to incur the expense and delay of holding a shareholder meeting to vote on proposals for such changes.

Investments in Real Estate Financings

While we intend to emphasize equity real estate investments, we may invest in first or second mortgages or other real estate-related investments that do not conflict with the maintenance of our REIT status. Such financings may or may not be insured or guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration, the Veterans Administration or another third-party. We may also invest in participating or convertible mortgages if our directors conclude that we and our shareholders may benefit from the cash flow or any appreciation in the value of the subject property. Investments in such mortgages are similar to equity participation.

Investments in Mezzanine Loans

We may make or invest in mezzanine loans that generally take the form of subordinated loans secured by second mortgages on the underlying real property or loans secured by a pledge of the ownership interests of an entity that directly or indirectly owns real property. An investment in a mezzanine loan generally involves a lower degree of risk than an equity investment in an entity that owns real property because the mezzanine loan investment is generally secured by the ownership interests in the property-owning entity and, as a result, is senior to the equity.

Although generally a lower-risk investment than an investment in equity, a mezzanine loan involves a higher degree of risk relative to a long-term senior mortgage loan secured by the real property underlying the mezzanine loan because the mezzanine loan may become unsecured as a result of foreclosure by the senior lender. If a borrower defaults on our mezzanine loan or debt senior to our loan, or in the event of a borrower bankruptcy, our mezzanine loan will be satisfied only after the senior mortgage loan. Further, mezzanine loans usually have higher loan-to-value ratios than traditional senior mortgage loans, increasing the risk of loss of principal. If we invest in mezzanine loans, we expect that we will generally charge higher interest rates than we would in connection with traditional mortgage loans and that we will receive a port ion of our return during the duration of the loan, with the balance payable upon maturity.

Issuing Securities for Property

Subject to limitations contained in our organizational and governance documents, we may issue, or cause to be issued, shares in Hines REIT or OP Units in the Operating Partnership in any manner (and on such terms and for such consideration) in exchange for real estate or interests in real estate. Existing shareholders have no preemptive rights to purchase such shares in any offering, and any such issuance of our shares or OP Units might result in dilution of a shareholder’s investment.

Affiliate Transaction Policy

Our board of directors has established a conflicts committee, which will review and approve all matters the board believes may involve a conflict of interest. This committee is composed solely of independent directors. Please see “Management — Committees of the Board of Directors — Conflicts Committee.” The conflicts committee of our board of directors will approve all transactions between us and Hines and its affiliates. Please see “Conflicts of Interest — Certain Conflict Resolution Procedures.”

Certain Other Policies

We intend to operate in such a manner that we will not be subject to regulation under the Investment Company Act. The Advisor will continually review our investment activity to attempt to ensure that we do not come within the application of the Investment Company Act. Among other things, the Advisor will attempt to monitor the proportion of our portfolio that is placed in various investments so that we do not come within the definition of an “investment company” under the act. If at any time the character of our investments could cause us to be deemed an investment company for purposes of the Investment Company Act, we will take all necessary actions to attempt to ensure that we are not deemed to be an “investment company.” Please see “Risk Factors — Investment Risks — We are not regi stered as an investment company under the Investment Company Act, and therefore we will not be subject to the requirements imposed on an investment company by such act. Similarly, the Core Fund is not registered as an investment company.” Please also see “Risk Factors — Investment Risks — If Hines REIT, the Operating Partnership or the Core Fund is required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act, the additional expenses and operational limitations associated with such registration may reduce your investment return.”

108

We do not intend to:

• underwrite securities of other issuers; or

• actively trade in loans or other investments.

Subject to the restrictions we must follow in order to qualify to be taxed as a REIT, we may make investments other than as previously described, although we do not currently intend to do so. We have authority to purchase or otherwise reacquire our common shares or any of our other securities. We have no present intention of repurchasing any of our common shares except pursuant to our share redemption program, and we would only take such action in conformity with applicable federal and state laws and the requirements for qualifying as a REIT under the Code.

Change in Investment Objectives, Policies and Limitations

Our charter requires our independent directors to review our investment policies at least annually to determine that the policies we are following are in the best interests of our shareholders. Each determination and the basis therefor is required to be set forth in the applicable meeting minutes. The methods of implementing our investment policies also may vary as new investment techniques are developed. The methods of implementing our investment objectives and policies, except as otherwise provided in our organizational documents, may be altered by a majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors, without the approval of our shareholders. Our primary investment objectives themselves and other investment policies and limitations specifically set forth in our charter, however, may only be amended by a vote of the shareholders holding a majority of our outstanding shares.

109

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following selected consolidated and combined financial data are qualified by reference to and should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” below.

	2008			2007			2006			2005			2004
	(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Operating Data:
Revenues	$	333,698		$	179,576		$	63,930		$	6,247		$	—
Depreciation and amortization	$	122,798		$	68,151		$	22,478		$	3,331		$	—
Asset management and acquisition fees	$	42,012		$	29,939		$	17,559		$	5,225		$	818
Organizational and offering expenses, net of reversal(1)	$	3,741		$	7,583		$	5,760		$	(6,630	)	$	14,771
General and administrative expenses, net(2)	$	5,991		$	4,570		$	2,819		$	494		$	618
Loss before income taxes, (income) loss allocated to minority interests and equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated entities, net	$	(146,415	)	$	(85,306	)	$	(38,919	)	$	(2,392	)	$	(16,549	)
Provision for income taxes	$	(2,512	)	$	(1,068	)	$	—		$	—		$	—
(Income) loss allocated to minority interests	$	(3,065	)	$	(1,266	)	$	429		$	635		$	6,541
Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated entities, net	$	(13,416	)	$	(8,288	)	$	(3,291	)	$	(831	)	$	68
Net loss	$	(165,408	)	$	(87,640	)	$	(38,490	)	$	(1,757	)	$	(10,008	)
Basic and diluted loss per common share	$	(0.90	)	$	(0.70	)	$	(0.79	)	$	(0.16	)	$	(60.40	)
Distributions authorized per common share(3)	$	0.64		$	0.62		$	0.61		$	0.60		$	0.06
Weighted average common shares outstanding — basic and diluted		183,776			125,776			48,468			11,061			166
Balance Sheet Data:
Total investment property(4)	$	2,374,007		$	1,798,924		$	677,564		$	117,878		$	—
Investment in unconsolidated entities	$	364,374		$	361,157		$	307,553		$	118,575		$	28,182
Total assets	$	3,280,437		$	2,703,623		$	1,213,662		$	297,334		$	30,112
Long-term obligations	$	1,691,335		$	1,273,596		$	498,989		$	77,922		$	409

____________

(1)	Based on actual gross proceeds raised in the initial offering, we were not obligated to reimburse the Advisor for certain organizational and offering costs that were previously accrued by us. Accruals of these costs were reversed in our financial statements during the year ended December 31, 2005.
(2)	During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Advisor forgave $1.7 million, which was previously advanced to us for certain corporate-level general and administrative expenses.
(3)	We paid our first distributions in January 2005 related to distributions declared for the period from November 23, 2004 through December 31, 2004.
(4)	We have revised the presentation of investment property to exclude the value associated with leases in place at the time an investment property is acquired as shown in the condensed consolidated balance sheet to be consistent with a majority of others in the industry. As a result, certain reclassifications have been made to the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 to be consistent with the 2008 presentation.

110

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto incorporated by reference into this prospectus. The following information contains forward-looking statements, which are subject to risks and uncertainties. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Please see “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” included in this prospectus for a description of these risks and uncertainties.

Executive Summary

We were formed in August 2003 for the purpose of investing in and owning interests in real estate. We have invested and continue to invest in real estate to satisfy our primary investment objectives, including: preserving invested capital, paying regular cash distributions and achieving some capital appreciation of our assets over the long term. We make investments directly through entities wholly-owned by the Operating Partnership, or indirectly through other entities, such as through our investment in the Core Fund. As of December 31, 2008, we owned direct and indirect investments in 59 properties. These properties consisted of 45 U.S. office properties, one mixed-use office and retail complex in Toronto, Ontario, one industrial property in Dallas, Texas, four industrial properties in Brazil and a portfolio of eight grocery - -anchored shopping centers located throughout the United States.

Our principal targeted assets are office properties that have quality construction, desirable locations and quality tenants. We expect to continue to focus primarily on investments in institutional-quality office properties located in the United States (whether as direct investments or as indirect investments through the Core Fund or otherwise). However, we also intend to continue to pursue other real estate investments that we believe will satisfy our long-term primary objectives of preserving invested capital and achieving some capital appreciation over the long term, in addition to providing regular cash distributions to our shareholders. To achieve these objectives, we intend to invest in properties which will be diversified by location, lease expirations and tenant industries. In the future, our investments may include additional investments outside of the United States, investments in additional non-office properties, non-core or development investments, loans, ground leases and investments in other joint ventures.

In order to provide capital for these investments, we sold shares to the public through our initial public offering (the “Initial Offering”) and our second public offering (the “Second Offering”), the latter of which terminated on June 30, 2008. On July 1, 2008, we commenced this public offering (the “Third Offering”) pursuant to which we are offering a maximum of $3.5 billion in common shares. We intend to continue raising significant amounts of capital through our Third Offering, which is anticipated to terminate on or before July 1, 2010, although we reserve the right to terminate this offering earlier or extend the termination to the extent we can under applicable law.

Economic Update

The financial markets continue to experience adverse impact from the credit crisis and global recession. Economic indicators deteriorated significantly in the fourth quarter of 2008 and there is uncertainty as to how severe the current recession will be as well as how long it will be before a recovery begins. The current economic downturn will continue to have an adverse effect on real estate market fundamentals, including tenant demand, overall occupancies, leasing velocity, rental rates, subletting and tenant defaults. We expect that these conditions will negatively impact our operations and, depending on the length and depth of the current recession, may limit our ability to maintain our current level of distributions to shareholders. We are proactively managing our portfolio in an effort to minimize the negative impacts during this time. As with most commercial real estate, our portfolio of assets is not immune to a recessionary economy. However, due to the quality and diversification of our portfolio, we believe that our portfolio is relatively well positioned to limit the negative impact from this down cycle.

111

To date, our portfolio has not experienced significant direct effects resulting from the events in the financial markets. As of December 31, 2008, our portfolio was 95% leased to a diverse tenant base over a variety of industries, with approximately 16% leased to several companies in the financial and insurance industries and approximately 14% leased to several companies in the legal industry. Our portfolio has no direct exposure to AIG or Lehman Brothers and very limited exposure to certain troubled individual tenants in the finance and insurance industries. Included in our portfolio at December 31, 2008 are several tenants who have sought bankruptcy protection. Leases to these tenants comprise approximately 0.5% of the leasable square feet in our portfolio based on our effective ownership interests in our properties. We bel ieve we have recorded adequate reserves against receivables from these tenants in our financial statements as of December 31, 2008 included elsewhere in this prospectus. We continue to be concerned about the ultimate impact of events in the financial markets on our tenants in the finance, insurance and legal industries and we are monitoring them in an effort to mitigate potential adverse impacts to our portfolio.

The capital markets affecting commercial real estate have also continued to deteriorate. Given the economic environment and the significant decline of the stock markets, there is significantly less capital being invested in most sectors including commercial real estate. In addition, investors are seeking liquidity and safety and, therefore, there is a significant increase in selling or redeeming securities. We have experienced similar circumstances whereby our proceeds received from our current offering have decreased and share redemptions under our redemption plan have increased.

The real estate debt markets are also distressed as financial institutions and other lenders have become capital constrained, and lenders and credit rating agencies have tightened underwriting standards. As a result, debt capital has become more expensive and difficult to obtain. We have managed our portfolio to date in an effort to minimize our exposure to volatility in the debt capital markets. We have done this by using moderate levels of long-term fixed-rate debt and minimizing our exposure to short-term variable rate debt which is more likely to be impacted by market volatility. Our portfolio was 55% leveraged as of December 31, 2008, with 97% of our debt in the form of long-term, fixed-rate mortgage loans (some of which are effectively fixed through the use of interest rate swaps). We had a $91.0 million mortgage loan t hat matured in 2009 which we successfully extended and thus have limited exposure to the negative impacts of attempting to refinance assets in the current debt markets. The one mortgage loan matured on March 11, 2009, and the non-payment of this loan at maturity created a non-monetary default under our revolving credit facility. We were granted an extension which was set to expire on April 23, 2009 to cure this default while we were negotiating a modification to the loan documents to provide for an extension of the maturity of such loan. On April 16, 2009, we executed a modification to the $91.0 million mortgage and pursuant to the terms of the modification, the maturity of the mortgage was extended to March 11, 2010 with the option for an additional 6-month extension subject to certain conditions. Concurrently, we made a principal payment of approximately $13.1 million to reduce the outstanding principal balance to $77.9 million. In addition, because the modification was e xecuted prior to the expiration of the extension that was previously granted to us, it cured the related non-monetary default under our revolving credit agreement, so we are back in compliance under our credit facility. All other significant terms and covenants of the loan remained the same, including the interest rate of 4.775%.

Values of commercial real estate assets and debt instruments have been impacted by the events described above. Values of assets have declined from the values achieved over the last 24 months. It is uncertain how much of the declines are attributable to the current illiquidity and volatility in the markets or a longer-term re-pricing of real estate assets. While real estate values have declined in recent months, values of existing, low-rate debt have increased as debt is now less available and more expensive. In conjunction with our recent share re-pricing which occurred in January 2009, we reflected the current valuations of our real estate investments and notes payable as of December 31, 2008. This resulted in our per share price declining from $10.66 to $10.08. Depending on how the broader economy and markets perform in the future, there is no assurance that values of commercial real estate will not decline further.

Given the current environment, we are focused on continuing to raise capital and strengthening our liquidity position to meet our operating needs and redemption requests, as well as to position ourselves to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities in the next 6 to 18 months. We believe that the current market environment will result in investment opportunities at significantly higher cap rates and decreased pricing of high quality real estate assets. This should result in investments which generate higher returns than assets acquired 12 to 24 months ago. To the extent we have capital available, we plan to actively pursue investment opportunities as we believe that during this time of severe constraints in debt and equity capital, the distress in the market may allow us access to attractively priced real estate in vestment opportunities.

112

We continue to manage our strong lending relationships with banks, insurance companies, pension funds and others that generally provide debt capital for commercial real estate transactions. During 2008, we were able to secure attractive mortgage financing for our acquisitions. Although new debt capital is more scarce and more expensive than it was during the last several years, we expect that it will continue to be available to us due to our reputation, financial strength and the quality of the assets we acquire. As we pursue new investment opportunities, we will continue to factor into such opportunities the current availability and price of debt capital. Notwithstanding the above, depending on market conditions and other factors, we may choose not to borrow to finance future new acquisitions or to place new debt on our existing portf olio or assets.

Although we cannot predict when the financial markets and broader economy will recover, we are actively managing our well-diversified portfolio of quality real estate assets to maximize its long-term income and value. Our sponsor, Advisor and Property Manager have significant experience through several real estate and economic cycles, and thus we believe we are relatively well-positioned to manage through these difficult and uncertain times.

Critical Accounting Policies

Each of our critical accounting policies involves the use of estimates that require management to make judgments that are subjective in nature. Management relies on its experience, collects historical and current market data, and analyzes these assumptions in order to arrive at what it believes to be reasonable estimates. Under different conditions or assumptions, materially different amounts could be reported related to the accounting policies described below. In addition, application of these accounting policies involves the exercise of judgments on the use of assumptions as to future uncertainties and, as a result, actual results could materially differ from these estimates.

Basis of Presentation

Our consolidated financial statements incorporated by reference herein include the accounts of Hines REIT and the Operating Partnership (over which Hines REIT exercises financial and operating control) and the Operating Partnership’s wholly-owned subsidiaries as well as the related amounts of minority interest. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

We evaluate the need to consolidate investments based on standards set forth in Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities and American Institute of Certified Public Accountants’ Statement of Position 78-9, Accounting for Investments in Real Estate Ventures and Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) No. 04-5, Investor’s Accounting for an Investment in a Limited Partnership When the Investor Is the Sole General Partner and the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights. Our joint ventures are evaluated based upon the guidance of FIN 46(R) to determine whether or not the investment qualifies as a variable interest entity (“VIE”). If the investment is determined to fall within the scope of FIN
60;46(R), an analysis is then performed to determine if we are the primary beneficiary of the VIE by reviewing a combination of qualitative and quantitative measures including analyzing expected investment portfolio using various assumptions to estimate the net operating income from the underlying assets. The projected cash flows are then analyzed to determine whether or not we are the primary beneficiary based upon the expected losses and residual returns of each variable interest holder. In addition to this analysis, we also consider the rights and decision making abilities of each holder of variable interest entity.

We will consolidate joint ventures that are determined to be variable interest entities for which we are the primary beneficiary. We will also consolidate joint ventures that are not determined to be variable interest entities, but for which we exercise significant control over major operating decisions, such as approval of budgets, selection of property managers, asset management, investment activity and changes in financing.

113

Our investments in partially owned real estate joint ventures and partnerships are reviewed for impairment, periodically, if events or circumstances change indicating that the carrying amount of our investments may not be recoverable. The ultimate realization of our investments in partially owned real estate joint ventures and partnerships is dependent on a number of factors, including the performance of each investment and market conditions. In accordance with the Accounting Principles Board’s APB 18, “The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock,” we will record an impairment charge if we determine that a decline in the value of an investment is other than temporary. Based on our analysis of the facts and circumstances at each reporting period, no impairment was recorded for the years ended Decemb er 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006. However, if conditions in the capital and real estate markets continue to deteriorate, we may record impairment on these investments in the future.

Investment Property and Lease Intangibles

Real estate assets that we own directly are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method. The estimated useful lives for computing depreciation are generally 10 years for furniture and fixtures, 15-20 years for electrical and mechanical installations and 40 years for buildings. Major replacements that extend the useful life of the assets are capitalized. Maintenance and repair costs are expensed as incurred.

Real estate assets are reviewed each reporting period for impairment if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the individual property may not be recoverable. In such an event, a comparison will be made of the current and projected operating cash flows of each property on an undiscounted basis to the carrying amount of such property. Such carrying amount would be adjusted, if necessary, to estimated fair values to reflect impairment in the value of the asset. At December 31, 2008, we believe no such impairment has occurred for our directly-owned assets. Please see “— Results of Operations — Our Interest in the Core Fund” for information regarding an impairment charge related to one of the Core Fund’s assets. The determination of whether investment property is impaired requires a significant amount of judgment and is based on the best information available to management at the time of the evaluation. If market conditions continue to deteriorate and result in lower valuations or reduced cash flows of our properties, impairment charges may be recorded in future periods.

Acquisitions of properties are accounted for utilizing the purchase method and, accordingly, the results of operations of acquired properties are included in our results of operations from their respective dates of acquisition. Estimates of future cash flows and other valuation techniques that we believe are similar to those used by independent appraisers are used to allocate the purchase price of acquired property between land, buildings and improvements, equipment and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities such as amounts related to in-place leases, acquired above- and below-market leases, tenant relationships, asset retirement obligations and mortgage notes payable. Values of buildings and improvements will be determined on an as if vacant basis. Initial valuations are subject to change until such information is finalized, n o later than 12 months from the acquisition date.

The estimated fair value of acquired in-place leases are the costs we would have incurred to lease the properties to the occupancy level of the properties at the date of acquisition. Such estimates include the fair value of leasing commissions, legal costs and other direct costs that would be incurred to lease the properties to such occupancy levels. Additionally, we evaluate the time period over which such occupancy levels would be achieved. Such evaluation includes an estimate of the net market-based rental revenues and net operating costs (primarily consisting of real estate taxes, insurance and utilities) that would be incurred during the lease-up period. Acquired in-place leases as of the date of acquisition are amortized over the remaining terms of the respective leases, which includes periods covered by bargain renewal options.

Acquired above-and below-market lease values are recorded based on the present value (using an interest rate that reflects the risks associated with the lease acquired) of the difference between the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and management’s estimate of fair market value lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases. The capitalized above- and below-market lease values are amortized as adjustments to rental revenue over the remaining terms of the respective leases, which includes periods covered by bargain renewal options. Should a tenant terminate its lease, the unamortized portion of the in-place lease value is charged to amortization expense and the unamortized portion of out-of-market lease value is charged to rental revenue.

114

Acquired above- and below-market ground lease values are recorded based on the difference between the present value (using an interest rate that reflects the risks associated with the lease acquired) of the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the ground leases and management’s estimate of fair market value of land under the ground leases. The capitalized above- and below-market lease values are amortized as adjustments to ground lease expense over the remaining terms of the respective leases, which includes periods covered by bargain renewal options.

We estimate the fair value of assumed mortgage notes payable based upon indications of current market pricing for similar types of debt with similar maturities. Assumed mortgage notes payable are initially recorded at their estimated fair value as of the assumption date, and the difference between such estimated fair value and the note’s outstanding principal balance is amortized over the life of the mortgage note payable.

Deferred Leasing Costs

Direct leasing costs, primarily consisting of third-party leasing commissions and tenant inducements, are capitalized and amortized over the life of the related lease. Tenant inducement amortization is recorded as an offset to rental revenue and the amortization of other direct leasing costs is recorded in amortization expense.

We consider a number of different factors to evaluate whether we or the lessee is the owner of the tenant improvements for accounting purposes. These factors include: 1) whether the lease stipulates how and on what a tenant improvement allowance may be spent; 2) whether the tenant or landlord retains legal title to the improvements; 3) the uniqueness of the improvements; 4) the expected economic life of the tenant improvements relative to the term of the lease; and 5) who constructs or directs the construction of the improvements.

The determination of who owns the tenant improvements for accounting purposes is subject to significant judgment. In making that determination, we consider all of the above factors. No one factor, however, necessarily establishes any determination.

Organizational and Offering Costs

Certain organizational and offering costs related to our Initial Offering and Second Offering have been paid by our Advisor on our behalf. Organizational and offering costs incurred by our Advisor have been analyzed and segregated between those which are organizational in nature, those which are offering-related salaries and other general and administrative expenses of the Advisor and its affiliates, and those which qualify as offering expenses in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) Topic 5.A, Miscellaneous Accounting — Expenses of Offering. Organizational costs are expensed as incurred in accordance with Statement of Position 98-5, Reporting on the Costs of Start-up Activities. Offering-related salaries and other general and administrative expenses of the Advisor and its affiliates are expensed as incurred, and third-party offering expenses are taken as a reduction against the net proceeds of the offerings within additional paid-in capital in accordance with SAB Topic 5.A. In addition to the offering costs paid to the Advisor, selling commissions and dealer manager fees are paid to the Dealer Manager. Such costs are netted against the net offering proceeds within additional paid-in capital as well.

On July 1, 2008, we entered into a new advisory agreement in connection with the Third Offering. Pursuant to the terms of the new advisory agreement, we are not obligated to reimburse the Advisor for organizational and offering costs related to the Third Offering. Additionally, the Advisor is not a shareholder of Hines REIT. Accordingly, no amounts of organizational and offering costs incurred by the Advisor in connection with the Third Offering during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 have been recorded in our consolidated financial statements.

115

Revenue Recognition and Valuation of Receivables

We are required to recognize minimum rent revenues on a straight-line basis over the terms of tenant leases, including rent holidays and periods covered by bargain renewal options, if any. Revenues associated with tenant reimbursements are recognized in the period in which the expenses are incurred based upon the tenant’s lease provision. Revenues related to lease termination fees are recognized at the time that the tenant’s right to occupy the space is terminated and when we have satisfied all obligations under the lease and are included in other revenue in our consolidated statements of operations. To the extent our leases provide for rental increases at specified intervals, we will record a receivable for rent not yet due under the lease terms. Accordingly, our management must determine, in its judgment, to what extent t he unbilled rent receivable applicable to each specific tenant is collectible. We review unbilled rent receivables on a quarterly basis and take into consideration the tenant’s payment history, the financial condition of the tenant, business conditions in the industry in which the tenant operates and economic conditions in the area in which the property is located. In the event that the collectability of unbilled rent with respect to any given tenant is in doubt, we would be required to record an increase in our allowance for doubtful accounts or record a direct write-off of the specific rent receivable, which would have an adverse effect on our net income for the year in which the reserve is increased or the direct write-off is recorded and would decrease our total assets and shareholders’ equity.

Derivative Instruments

We have entered into several forward interest rate swap transactions with HSH Nordbank AG, New York Branch (“HSH Nordbank”). These swap transactions were entered into as economic hedges against the variability of future interest rates on the Company’s variable interest rate borrowings with HSH Nordbank. We have not designated any of these contracts as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes. The valuation of the interest rate swaps is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves. The fair values of interest rate swaps are determined using the market stand ard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts (or payments) and the discounted expected variable cash payments (or receipts). The variable cash payments (or receipts) are based on an expectation of future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate curves.

The interest rate swaps have been recorded at their estimated fair value in our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2008 and 2007. Changes in the fair value of the interest rate swaps have been recorded in our condensed consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006. We mark the interest rate swaps to their estimated fair value as of each balance sheet date, and the changes in fair value are reflected in our consolidated statements of operations.

Treatment of Management Compensation, Expense Reimbursements and Operating Partnership Participation Interest

We outsource management of our operations to the Advisor and certain other affiliates of Hines. Fees related to these services are accounted for based on the nature of the service and the relevant accounting literature. Fees for services performed that represent period costs of the Company are expensed as incurred. Such fees include acquisition fees and asset management fees paid to the Advisor and property management fees paid to Hines. In addition to cash payments for acquisition fees and asset management fees paid to the Advisor, an affiliate of the Advisor has received a profits interest in the Operating Partnership related to these services (the “Participation Interest”). As the percentage interest of the Participation Interest is adjusted, the value attributable to such adjustment is charged against earnings and a lia bility is recorded until it is repurchased for cash or converted into our common shares. In addition, the liability is remeasured at fair value at each balance sheet date with related adjustments charged to earnings in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (as amended). The determination of the adjustment for the Participation Interest is subject to significant judgment.

116

The conversion and redemption features of the participation interest are accounted for in accordance with the guidance in EITF No. 95-7, Implementation Issues Related to the Treatment of Minority Interests in Certain Real Estate Investment Trusts. Redemptions of the Participation Interest for cash will be accounted for as a reduction to the liability discussed above to the extent of such liability, with any additional amounts recorded as a reduction to equity. Conversions into our common shares will be recorded as an increase to the outstanding common shares and additional paid-in capital accounts and a corresponding reduction in the liability discussed above. Redemptions and conversions of the Participation Interest will result in a corresponding reduction in the percentage attributable to the Participation Interest and will have no impact on the calculation of subsequent increases in the Participation Interest.

Income Taxes

We made an election to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), beginning with its taxable year ended December 31, 2004. In addition the Core Fund has invested in properties through other entities that have elected to be taxed as REITs. Our management believes that the Company and the applicable entities in the Core Fund are organized and operate in such a manner as to qualify for treatment as REITs and intend to operate in the foreseeable future in such a manner so that they will remain qualified as REITs for federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, no provision has been made for U.S. federal income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 in our consolidated financial statements. Income tax expense recorded by th e Company is primarily comprised of a provision for Canadian income taxes and a provision for the Texas margin tax.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

We adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, in the first quarter of 2008 regarding its financial assets and liabilities. The FASB has issued Staff Position No. FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which defers the provisions of SFAS 157 relating to nonfinancial assets and liabilities, and delays implementation by the Company until January 1, 2009. The adoption of the provisions of SFAS 157 relating to nonfinancial assets and liabilities did not have a significant material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“SFAS No. 159”). SFAS No. 159 expands opportunities to use fair value measurement in financial reporting and permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. This Statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We have adopted this standard effective January 1, 2008 and elected not to measure any of our current eligible financial assets or liabilities at fair value upon adoption; however, we may elect to measure future eligible financial assets or liabilities at fair value.

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141 (Revised 2007), Business Combinations (“SFAS No. 141R”). SFAS No. 141R will significantly change the accounting for business combinations. Under SFAS No. 141R, an acquiring entity will be required to recognize all the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition-date fair value with limited exceptions. SFAS No. 141R will change the accounting treatment for certain specific acquisition-related items including: (1) expensing acquisition related costs as incurred; (2) valuing noncontrolling interests at fair value at the acquisition date; and (3) expensing restructuring costs associated with an acquired business. SFAS No. 141R also includes a substantial number of new disclosu re requirements. SFAS No. 141R is to be applied prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after January 1, 2009. Management expects SFAS No. 141R will have a significant impact in future periods to the extent that real estate acquisitions are significant.

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements (“SFAS No. 160”). SFAS No. 160 establishes requirements for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the Company (sometimes called “minority interests”) be clearly identified, presented, and disclosed in the consolidated statement of financial position within equity, but separate from the parent’s equity. All changes in the parent’s ownership interests are required to be accounted for consistently as equity transactions and any noncontrolling equity investments in deconsolidated subsidiaries must be measured initially at fair value. SFAS No. 160 is effective, on a prospective basis, for fiscal years beginning after December 15 , 2008. However, presentation and disclosure requirements must be retrospectively applied to comparative financial statements. Management is currently assessing the impact of SFAS No. 160 on our consolidated financial statements.

117

In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — an amendment to FASB Statement No. 133 (“SFAS No. 161”). This statement contains disclosure requirements regarding an entity’s derivative instruments and hedging activities such as: (i) how and why they are used; (ii) how they are accounted for and (iii) how they affect an entity’s financial statements. SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. Implementation of SFAS No. 161 will result in certain additional disclosures to be included in our consolidated financial statements.

In October 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 157-3 Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset is Not Active (“FSP 157-3”). FSP 157-3 clarifies the application of FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, in a market that is not active and provides an example to illustrate key considerations in determining the fair value of a financial asset when the market for that financial asset is not active. FSP 157-3 was effective upon issuance, including prior periods for which financial statements have not been issued. The issuance of FSP 157-3 did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In April 2009, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 157-4 Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly (“FSP 157-4”). FSP 157-4 provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, when the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability have decreased significantly. This guidance re-emphasizes the FASB position that fair value is the price exchanged in an orderly transaction (not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. FSP 157-4 is effective for periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for p eriods ending after March 15, 2009. We do not intend to early adopt this guidance, and the issuance of FSP 157-4 is not expected to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

International Operations

The Canadian dollar is the functional currency for our subsidiaries operating in Toronto, Ontario and the Brazilian real is the functional currency for our subsidiaries operating in Brazil. Our foreign subsidiaries have translated their financial statements into U.S. dollars for reporting purposes. Assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate in effect as of the balance sheet date. We translate income statement accounts using the average exchange rate for the period and significant nonrecurring transactions using the rate on the transaction date. These gains or losses are included in accumulated other comprehensive income as a separate component of shareholders’ equity.

Our international subsidiaries may have transactions denominated in currencies other than their functional currency. In these instances, assets and liabilities are remeasured into the functional currency using the exchange rate in effect at the date of the transaction.

Our subsidiaries also record gains or losses in the income statement when a transaction with a third party, denominated in a currency other than the entity’s functional currency, is settled and the functional currency cash flows realized are more or less than expected based upon the exchange rate in effect when the transaction was initiated.

118

Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

General

Our principal cash requirements are for property acquisitions, property-level operating expenses, capital improvements, debt service, certain organizational and offering expenses, corporate-level general and administrative expenses, distributions and redemptions. We have three primary sources of capital for meeting our cash requirements:

• proceeds from our public offerings, including our dividend reinvestment plan;

• debt financings, including secured or unsecured facilities; and

• cash flow generated by our real estate investments and operations.

For the year ended December 31, 2008, our cash needs for acquisitions and for additional investments in our properties have been met primarily by proceeds from our public equity offerings and debt financing while our operating cash needs have primarily been met through cash flow generated by our properties and investments. We believe that our current capital resources and cash flow from operations are sufficient to meet our liquidity needs for the foreseeable future; however, any cash used to fund redemption requests from shareholders reduces our liquidity available to fund acquisitions of real estate investments and other cash needs.

We intend to continue making real estate investments using proceeds from our public offerings and funds available to us under our credit facilities and other permanent debt. We intend to refinance mortgage debt expiring in the near term with new mortgage financing or our revolving credit facility. We also intend to continue to pay distributions to our shareholders on a quarterly basis.

On March 11, 2009, we had a $91.0 million mortgage loan which matured, and the non-payment of this loan at maturity created a non-monetary default under our revolving credit facility. We were granted an extension which was set to expire on April 23, 2009 to cure this default while we were negotiating a modification to the loan documents to provide for an extension of the maturity of such loan. On April 16, 2009, we executed a modification to the $91.0 million mortgage and pursuant to the terms of the modification, the maturity of the mortgage was extended to March 11, 2010 with the option for an additional 6-month extension subject to certain conditions. Concurrently, we made a principal payment of approximately $13.1 million to reduce the outstanding principal balance to $77.9 million. In additi on, because the modification was executed prior to the expiration of the extension that was previously granted to us, it cured the related non-monetary default under our revolving credit agreement, so we are back in compliance under our credit facility. All other significant terms and covenants of the loan remained the same, including the interest rate of 4.775%.

Additionally, HSH Nordbank has the right to have the properties serving as collateral under the HSH Nordbank credit facility appraised every two years. Should the aggregate outstanding principal amounts under this facility exceed 55% of the lender’s appraised values, we must rebalance through making partial payment or providing additional collateral to eliminate such excess. Considering the declining real estate values in recent months, we expect that we may be required to repay certain amounts outstanding in the upcoming quarters to maintain compliance with this covenant. Should we need to do so, we expect to fund such amounts with proceeds from our current offering or with borrowings from our Revolving Credit Facility.

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

Our direct investments in real estate assets generate cash flow in the form of rental revenues, which are reduced by debt service, direct leasing costs and property-level operating expenses. Property-level operating expenses consist primarily of salaries and wages of property management personnel, utilities, cleaning, insurance, security and building maintenance costs, property management and leasing fees, and property taxes. Additionally, we incur corporate-level debt service, general and administrative expenses, asset management and acquisition fees.

119

Net cash provided by operating activities was $40.6 million, $17.2 million and $7.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The increase is primarily due to operating cash flows from acquisitions during the past two years. Our operating net cash flows are primarily the result of the net loss for the period partially offset by non-cash components of our net loss such as depreciation and amortization, equity in losses of unconsolidated entities, losses on derivative instruments and changes in operating accounts.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

During the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 we had cash outflows totaling $668.0 million, $1,175.4 million and $586.8 million, respectively, related to the acquisition of properties and their related lease intangibles. The change in outflows is a function of the aggregate purchase price of properties acquired during each year. In addition, we received $4.0 million related to the sale of the Williams Tower 2.8-acre waterwall and park in December 2008.

During the year ended December 31, 2008 we made no capital contributions to the Core Fund. During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, we made capital contributions to the Core Fund totaling $58.0 million and $209.3 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2008, we had invested $395.5 million in the Core Fund representing an approximate 28.7% non-managing general partner interest compared to the approximate 32.0% and 34.0% interest we owned at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, we received distributions from the Core Fund totaling $26.9 million, $25.4 million and $14.8 million, respectively, which was included in cash flows from investing activities as it exceeded our equity in earnings of the joint venture.

During the year ended December 31, 2007 we acquired a 50% interest in Distribution Park Rio through a joint venture with HCB for an initial investment of $28.9 million. During the year ended December 31, 2008, we received distributions from Distribution Park Rio totaling $2.7 million. Approximately $509,000 of this amount was included in cash flows from investing activities as it exceeded our equity in earnings of the joint venture and the remaining amount was included in operating cash flows. During the year ended December 31, 2007, we received distributions from Distribution Park Rio totaling $1.0 million, of which $385,000 was recorded in cash flows from investing activities as it exceeded our equity in earnings of the joint venture.

On November 13, 2008, we acquired 70.0% non-managing interest in the portfolio of eight grocery-anchored shopping centers through a joint venture for an initial cash investment of $52.0 million. Our equity in earnings of this investment for the year ended December 31, 2008 was approximately $28,000.

During the year ended December 31, 2008, we had cash inflows of $4.6 million, net of receipts, for master leases entered into in connection with our acquisitions. During the year ended December 31, 2007, we had cash outflows of $5.7 million, net of receipts, for master leases entered into in connection with our acquisitions.

During the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, we had increases in restricted cash and marketable securities of approximately $12.8 million, $712,000 and $2.5 million, respectively, related to certain escrows required by our mortgage agreements.

During the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, we had cash outflows related to other assets of $4.9 million and $10.0 million, and $8.9 million, respectively, primarily as a result of deposits paid on investment properties that were acquired subsequent to the applicable year-end.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

Equity Offerings

We offer shares of our common stock for sale through continuous public offerings, which provides us with the ability to raise capital on an ongoing basis. We raised $527.5 million in proceeds through our Initial Offering prior to its expiration on June 18, 2006. We raised $1.5 billion in proceeds through our Second Offering prior to its expiration on June 30, 2008.

120

We commenced our Third Offering on July 1, 2008, pursuant to which we are offering up to $3.5 billion in shares of common stock, including $500.0 million in shares of common stock under our dividend reinvestment plan. As of December 31, 2008, we had raised $153.3 million in proceeds through the Third Offering. As of December 31, 2008, $2,864.1 million in common shares remained available for sale pursuant to our Third Offering, exclusive of $482.6 million in common shares available under our dividend reinvestment plan.

Redemptions

Pursuant to our share redemption program, we repurchase outstanding shares on a monthly basis subject to certain restrictions. During the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, we redeemed $58.7 million, $10.6 million and $2.3 million in shares, respectively.

Payment of Offering and Other Costs and Expenses

In addition to making investments in accordance with our investment objectives, we use our capital resources to pay the Dealer Manager and our Advisor for services they provide to us during the various phases of our organization and operations. During the offering stage, we pay the Dealer Manager selling commissions and dealer manager fees, and during our Initial and Second Offerings we reimbursed the Advisor for organizational and offering costs.

For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, we paid the Dealer Manager selling commissions of $29.5 million, $53.8 million, and $34.0 million, respectively, and we paid dealer manager fees of $9.8 million, $17.4 million, and $13.4 million, respectively. All such selling commissions and a portion of such Dealer Manager fees were reallowed by the Dealer Manager to participating broker dealers for their services in selling our shares.

During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Advisor incurred organizational and offering costs related to the Initial Offering totaling $6.6 million. During the year ended December 31, 2006, we made payments totaling $10.0 million to our Advisor for reimbursement of Initial Offering organizational and offering costs. The Initial Offering terminated in June 2006. No additional costs were incurred during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 related to the Initial Offering.

During the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Advisor incurred organizational offering costs related to the Second Offering totaling $8.0 million, $16.6 million and $11.1 million, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, we made payments totaling $10.3 million, $19.3 million and $7.5 million, respectively, to our Advisor for reimbursement of organizational and offering costs.

The amount of organizational and offering costs, commissions and dealer manager fees we paid during the year ended December 31, 2008 decreased, as compared to the same period in 2007, primarily as a result of a decrease in capital raised through our public offerings during 2008. In addition, pursuant to the terms of the Third Offering, which commenced on July 1, 2008, we are not required to reimburse the advisor for organizational and offering costs. See “— Critical Accounting Policies — Organizational and Offering Costs” above for additional information. The amount of organizational and offering costs, commissions and dealer manager fees during the year ended December 31, 2007 increased, as compared to the same period in 2006, as a result of an increase in capital raised through our Sec ond Offering during 2007.

Advances from Affiliates

In our initial quarters of operations, our Advisor advanced funds to us to allow us to pay certain of our corporate-level operating expenses. For the year ended December 31, 2006, our Advisor had advanced to or made payments on our behalf totaling $1.6 million and we made repayments totaling $2.7 million. We did not receive any advances from our Advisor after June 30, 2006 and as of December 31, 2006 we had repaid our Advisor all amounts related to these advances.

121

Distributions

In order to meet the requirements for being treated as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and to pay regular cash distributions to our shareholders, which is one of our investment objectives, we have declared and expect to continue to declare distributions to shareholders (as authorized by our board of directors) as of daily record dates and aggregate and pay such distributions quarterly.

From July 1, 2006 through April 30, 2008, we declared distributions (as authorized by our board of directors) equal to $0.00170959 per share, per day. We increased the dividend rate to $0.00175233 per share, per day for the months of May through December 2008. Additionally, we have declared distributions equal to $0.00175233 per share, per day for the period from January 1, 2009 through May 31, 2009. The distributions declared were authorized and set by our board of directors at a level the board believed to be appropriate based upon the board’s evaluation of our assets, historical and projected levels of cash flow and results of operations, additional capital and debt anticipated to be raised or incurred and invested in the future, the historical and projected timing between receiving offering proceeds and in vesting such proceeds in real estate investments, and general market conditions and trends.

The table below outlines our total distributions declared to shareholders and minority interests for each of the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, including the breakout between the distributions paid in cash and those reinvested pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan (all amounts are in thousands):

	Shareholders						Minority Interest
Year Ended	Cash Distributions		Dividends Reinvested		Total Declared		Total Declared
December 31, 2008	$	52,297	$	64,740	$	117,037	$	3,065
December 31, 2007	$	34,092	$	44,401	$	78,493	$	1,919
December 31, 2006	$	11,443	$	18,397	$	29,840	$	1,112

For each of the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, we funded our cash distributions with cash flows from operating activities and distributions received from our unconsolidated investments.

Debt Financings

We use debt financing from time to time for acquisitions and investments as well as for property improvements, tenant improvements, leasing commissions and other working capital needs. We may obtain financing at the time an asset is acquired or an investment is made or at such later time as determined to be appropriate, depending on market conditions and other factors.

During 2008, we entered into $251.0 million of permanent mortgage financing related to our wholly-owned property acquisitions. We also assumed an $54.2 million mortgage related to our acquisition of the Raytheon/DirecTV Buildings and three mortgage loans totaling $31.9 million related to our acquisition of 345 Inverness Drive and the Arapahoe Business Parks. These mortgages were primarily interest-only and had terms that varied from five to eight years with a weighted average interest rate of 5.51%. In addition, we received proceeds of $395.5 million and made debt payments of $380.2 million, primarily related to borrowings under our revolver. As of December 31, 2008, our debt financing was approximately 55% of the aggregate value of our real estate investments (including our pro rata share of real estate a ssets and related debt owned through our investments in other entities such as the Core Fund).

During 2007, we entered into $863.2 million of permanent mortgage financing related to our wholly-owned property acquisitions. These mortgages were primarily interest-only and had terms that varied from five to 10 years with a weighted average interest rate of 5.63%. In addition, we received proceeds of $416.7 million and made debt payments of $578.8 million, primarily related to borrowings under our revolver. As of December 31, 2007, our debt financing was approximately 54% of the aggregate value of our real estate investments (including our pro rata share of real estate assets and related debt owned through our investments in other entities such as the Core Fund).

122

During 2006, we entered into $395.0 million of permanent mortgage financing related to our wholly-owned property acquisitions. We also assumed a $91.0 million mortgage related to our acquisition of Airport Corporate Center. These mortgages were primarily interest-only and had terms that varied from three to 10 years with a weighted average interest rate of 5.53%. In addition, we received proceeds of $410.2 million and made debt payments of $323.1 million, primarily related to borrowings under our revolver and made payments of $165.0 million to repay a term loan that was refinanced. As of December 31, 2006, our debt financing was approximately 53% of the aggregate value of our real estate investments (including our pro rata share of real estate assets and related debt owned through our investments in o ther entities such as the Core Fund).

Results of Operations

Year ended December 31, 2008 compared to the Year ended December 31, 2007

Results for our Directly-Owned Properties

We owned 25 properties directly that were 95% leased as of December 31, 2008 compared to 16 properties that were 94% leased as of December 31, 2007. The following table presents the property-level revenues and expenses for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to the same period in 2007. Same-store properties for the year ended December 31, 2008 include all properties owned as of January 1, 2007 as well as the Laguna Buildings, which were acquired on January 3, 2007. Revenues and expenses for properties acquired after January 3, 2007 are included in “Recent Acquisitions.” All amounts are in thousands, except for percentages:

	Year Ended December 31,				Change
	2008		2007		$			%
Property revenues
Same-store properties	$	114,650	$	111,088	$	3,562		3.2	%
Recent acquisitions		219,048		68,488		150,560		219.8	%
Total property revenues	$	333,698	$	179,576	$	154,122		85.8	%
Property expenses(1)
Same-store properties	$	87,809	$	89,191	$	(1,382	)	(1.5	)%
Recent acquisitions		177,369		58,457		118,913		203.4	%
Total property expenses	$	265,178	$	147,648	$	117,530		79.6	%
Property revenues in excess of expenses
Same-store properties	$	26,841	$	21,897	$	4,944		22.6	%
Recent acquisitions		41,679		10,031		31,648		315.5	%
Total property revenues in excess of expenses	$	68,520	$	31,928	$	36,592		114.6	%
Interest Income/Expense
Interest Expense	$	83,111	$	47,835	$	35,276		73.7	%
Interest Income	$	3,544		5,321	$	(1,777	)	(33.4	)%

____________

(1) Property expenses include property operating expenses, real property taxes, property management fees, depreciation and amortization of real estate assets and income taxes.

As indicated above, the increases in property revenues and expenses between 2008 and 2007 were primarily due to acquisitions made in those years. Revenues and expenses from our same-store properties were comparable between both years. However, the margin of property revenues in excess of property expenses for same-store properties increased to 23.4% in 2008 from 19.7% in 2007. The increase in the margins is due to increased average occupancy at our properties, a $4.6 million decrease in depreciation and amortization resulting from fully depreciated lease intangibles, offset by a $2.6 million increase in operating expenses resulting from increased utility costs.

123

The increase in interest expense is primarily due to increased borrowings related to our acquisitions of directly-owned properties. Average debt outstanding during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 was $1,373.2 million and $848.9 million, respectively. The decrease in interest income is primarily due to a reduction in the amount of cash we held in short-term investments during delays between raising capital and acquiring real estate investments and lower interest rates.

As a result of future potential acquisitions and our recent acquisitions having less than a full period of operations, our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2008 are not indicative of what we expect our results of operations to be in future periods.

Results for our Indirectly-Owned Properties

Our Interest in the Core Fund

As of December 31, 2008, we owned a 28.7% non-managing general partner interest in the Core Fund, which held interests in 25 properties that were 91% leased. By comparison, we owned a 32.0% interest in the Core Fund as of December 31, 2007, which held interests in 24 properties that were 92% leased.

Our equity in losses related to our investment in the Core Fund for the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 was $15.6 million and $8.7 million, respectively. The increase is related to the net loss of the Core Fund, which increased to $52.1 million from $26.5 million. Our equity in the Core Fund’s 2008 net loss included $3.1 million resulting from an impairment charge recorded at one of the Core Fund’s properties, and the remaining increase was primarily attributable to additional depreciation and amortization resulting from its recent acquisitions.

Our Interest in the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio

We acquired a 70.0% non-managing interest in a portfolio of eight grocery-anchored shopping centers located across four states in the United States on November 13, 2008. Our equity in earnings related to our investment in this portfolio for the period from acquisition to December 31, 2008 was approximately $28,000. For the period from acquisition to December 31, 2008, this portfolio had net income of approximately $957,000 on revenues of $2.5 million.

Our Interest in Distribution Park Rio

We own a 50% non-managing interest in Distribution Park Rio, which we acquired in July 2007. Our equity in earnings related to our investment in Distribution Park Rio for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 was approximately $2.2 million and $385,000, respectively. The increase is due to owning our interest in Distribution Park Rio for the entire year in 2008 compared to six months in 2007 and decreased amortization resulting from fully depreciated lease intangibles.

Corporate-level Activities

Corporate-level activities include results related to derivative instruments, asset management and acquisition fees, general and administrative expenses as well as other expenses which are not directly related to our property operations.

Derivative Instruments

We have entered into several forward interest rate swap transactions with HSH Nordbank as economic hedges against the variability of future interest rates on our variable interest rate borrowings. We have not designated any of these contracts as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes. The interest rate swaps have been recorded at their estimated fair value in our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2008 and 2007.

In addition, on February 8, 2007, we entered into a foreign currency contract related to the acquisition of Atrium on Bay, a mixed-use office and retail property located in Toronto, Ontario. The contract was entered into as an economic hedge against the variability of the foreign currency exchange rate related to our equity investment and was settled at the close of this acquisition on February 26, 2007.

124

The tables below provide additional information regarding each of the Company’s outstanding interest rate swaps as of December 31, 2008 (all amounts are in thousands except interest rates):

Effective Date	Expiration Date	Notional Amount		Interest Rate
August 1, 2006	August 1, 2016	$	185,000		5.8575	%
January 12, 2007	January 12, 2017		98,000		5.2505	%
May 2, 2007	May 2, 2017		119,000		5.3550	%
July 19, 2007	July 19, 2017		48,000		5.9800	%
August 14, 2007	August 14, 2017		70,000		6.0300	%

As indicated by the table below, the increase in losses on derivative instruments is primarily due to the decrease in the fair value of the derivatives resulting from decreasing interest rates during 2008.

Period	Decrease in Fair Value			Transaction Fees			Foreign  Currency Gain		Loss on Derivative
Instruments, net
Year Ended December 31, 2008	$	(85,880	)	$	—		$	—	$	(85,880	)
Year Ended December 31, 2007	$	(25,750	)	$	(731	)	$	939	$	(25,542	)

Other Corporate-level Activities

The table below provides detail relating to our asset management and acquisition fees and general and administrative expense for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007. All amounts in thousands, except percentages:

	Year Ended December 31,				Change
	2008		2007		$		%
Asset Management and Acquisition Fees	$	42,012	$	29,939	$	12,073	40.3	%
General and Administrative Expenses	$	5,991	$	4,570	$	1,421	31.1	%

We pay monthly asset management fees to our Advisor based on the amount of net equity capital invested in real estate investments and pay acquisition fees to our Advisor based on the purchase prices of our real estate investments. A portion of these fees is paid in cash and the remainder is satisfied through the participation interest The increase in asset management and acquisition fees resulted from a larger portfolio of assets under management in 2008 as a result of the acquisitions that we made during the year.

General and administrative expenses include legal and accounting fees, insurance costs, costs and expenses associated with our board of directors and other administrative expenses. Certain of these costs are variable and may increase in the future as we continue to raise capital and make additional real estate investments. The increase in general and administrative expenses is primarily due to increased costs of shareholder communications, audit and legal fees as the Company’s activities and shareholder base continue to grow.

Income/Loss Allocated to Minority Interests

As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, Hines REIT owned a 97.3% and 97.6% interest in the Operating Partnership, respectively, and affiliates of Hines owned the remaining 2.7% and 2.4% interests, respectively. We allocated income of $3.1 million and $1.3 million, respectively, to the holders of these minority interests for the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.

125

Year ended December 31, 2007 compared to the year ended December 31, 2006

Results of Our Directly-Owned Properties

We owned 16 properties directly that were 94% leased as of December 31, 2007 compared to eight properties that were 95% leased as of December 31, 2006. We have not included a same-store analysis for 2007 compared to 2006 because there were only three properties in our portfolio that had a full year of operations in both 2007 and 2006.

Between 2006 and 2007, property operating revenues increased from $63.9 million to $179.6 million and property operating expenses (which includes property operating expenses, real property taxes, property management fees, depreciation and amortization of real estate assets and income taxes) increased from $51.2 million to $147.6 million. The increase in operating revenues and expenses between 2007 and 2006 is primarily attributable to our direct real estate acquisitions during those years, in addition to the operation of properties owned as of January 1, 2006. For example, acquisitions consummated during 2007 accounted for approximately 44% of total revenues and 35% of total expenses for that year. Acquisitions consummated during 2006 accounted for approximately 70% of total revenues and 46% of total expenses f or that year.

The increase in interest expense from $18.3 million in 2006 to $47.8 million in 2007 is primarily due to increased borrowings related to our acquisitions of directly-owned properties and our investments in the Core Fund during 2007. Average debt outstanding during the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 was $848.9 million and $278.1 million, respectively.

The increase in interest income from $1.4 million in 2006 to $5.3 million in 2007 is primarily due to increased cash we held in short-term investments during delays between raising capital and acquiring real estate investments.

Results of Our Indirectly-Owned Properties

Our Interest in the Core Fund

As of December 31, 2007, we owned a 32.0% non-managing general partner interest in the Core Fund, which held interests in 24 properties that were 92% leased. By comparison, we owned a 34.0% interest in the Core Fund as of December 31, 2006, which held interests in 14 properties that were 94% leased.

Our equity in losses related to our investment in the Core Fund for the year ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 was $8.7 million and $3.3 million, respectively. The increase is related to the net loss of the Core Fund, which increased to $26.5 million from $9.9 million, primarily as a result of additional depreciation and amortization resulting from 2007 acquisitions and accelerated depreciation related to a redevelopment at one of its properties.

Corporate-level Activities

Corporate-level activities include results related to derivative instruments, asset management and acquisition fees, general and administrative expenses as well as other expenses which are not directly related to our property operations.

Derivative Instruments

The table below provides information regarding the Company’s outstanding interest rate swaps with HSH Nordbank as of December 31, 2007 (amounts are in thousands): As indicated by the table below, the increase in losses on derivative instruments is primarily due to the decrease in the fair value of the derivatives resulting from decreasing interest rates during 2007.

Period	Decrease in Fair Value			Transaction Fees			Foreign Currency Gain		Loss on Derivative Instruments, net
Year Ended December 31, 2007	$	(25,750	)	$	(731	)	$	939	$	(25,542	)
Year Ended December 31, 2006	$	(4,444	)	$	(862	)	$	—	$	(5,306	)

126

Other Corporate-level Activities

The table below provides detail relating to our asset management and acquisition fees and general and administrative expense for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006. All amounts in thousands, except percentages:

	Year Ended December 31,				Change
	2007		2006		$		%
Asset Management and Acquisition Fees	$	29,939	$	17,559	$	12,380	70.5	%
General and Administrative Expenses	$	4,570	$	2,819	$	1,751	62.1	%

The increase in asset management and acquisition fees during 2007 compared to 2006 resulted from a larger portfolio of assets under management and an increase in the amount invested in real estate during 2007.

The increase in general and administrative expenses during 2007 compared to 2006 is primarily due to increased costs of shareholder communications and audit fees as the Company’s activities and shareholder base continue to grow. We also incurred additional costs in 2007 related to compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Income/Loss Allocated to Minority Interests

As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, Hines REIT owned a 97.6% and 97.4% interest in the Operating Partnership, respectively, and affiliates of Hines owned the remaining 2.4% and 2.6% interests, respectively. We allocated income of $1.3 million to the holders of these minority interests for the year ended December 31, 2007. We allocated losses of $429,000 to the holders of these minority interests for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Operating Funds Generated by the Company

Operating funds generated by the Company (“OFG”) is a non-GAAP supplemental financial performance measure that our management uses in evaluating the operating performance of the Company. It includes funds generated by the operations of our real estate investments and funds used in the Company’s corporate-level operations. Similar to Funds from Operations (“FFO”), a non-GAAP financial performance measure defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) widely recognized as a measure of operating performance, OFG excludes items such as depreciation and amortization. However, changes in the accounting and reporting rules under GAAP that have been put into effect since the establishment of NAREIT’s definition of FFO have prompted a significant increase in the ma gnitude of non-cash and non-operating items included in FFO, as defined. Such items include amortization of certain in-place lease intangible assets and liabilities and the amortization of certain tenant incentives. OFG excludes these items, the effects of straight-line rent revenue recognition, fair value adjustments to derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment and certain other items as described in the footnotes below, and also includes items such as master lease rental receipts, which are excluded from net income (loss) and FFO, but which we consider in the evaluation of the operating performance of our real estate investments. We believe that OFG reflects the overall impact on the performance of our real estate investments of occupancy rates, rental rates, property operating costs, as well as corporate-level general and administrative expenses and interest costs, which is not immediately apparent from net income (loss). As such, we believe OFG, in addition to net income ( loss) and cash flows from operating activities as defined by GAAP, is a meaningful supplemental performance measure and is useful in understanding how the Company’s management evaluates the Company’s ongoing operating performance.

However, OFG should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) or to cash flows from operating activities and is not intended to be used as a liquidity measure indicative of cash flow available to fund the Company’s cash needs. Additionally, please see the limitations listed below associated with the use of OFG as compared to net income (loss):

127

• OFG excludes gains (losses) related to changes in estimated values of derivative instruments related to our interest rate swaps. Although we expect to hold these instruments to maturity, if we were to settle these instruments currently, it would have an impact on our operations.

• OFG excludes the Participation Interest component of the acquisition and asset management fees. Although we believe the settlement of this liability will be funded using proceeds from the sale of properties in the future, if we were to settle it currently it would have an impact on our operations.

• OFG excludes organizational and offering expenses and acquisition expenses payable to our Advisor. Although these amounts reduce net income, we fund such costs with proceeds from our offering and acquisition-related indebtedness and do not consider these expenses in the evaluation of the operating performance of the Company and determining OFG.

The table below summarizes OFG for the year ended December 31, 2008 and provides a reconciliation of such non-GAAP financial performance measure to our net income (loss) for the year then ended (in thousands):

	Year Ended December 31, 2008
Net Loss	$	(165,408	)
Adjustments:
Depreciation and amortization(1)		122,798
Loss on derivative instruments(2)		85,880
Participation interest expense(3)		18,648
Other components of revenues and expenses(4)		(13,431	)
Master lease rents(5)		6,984
Organizational and offering expenses(6)		3,741
Acquisition fees(6)		11,141
Adjustments to equity in losses from unconsolidated entities, net(7)		47,041
Adjustments for minority interests(8)		(13	)
Operating Funds Generated by the Company	$	117,381
Operating Funds Generated by the Company Per Common Share	$	0.64
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding		183,776

____________

(1)	Represents the depreciation and amortization of various real estate assets. Historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, we believe that such depreciation and amortization may be of limited relevance in evaluating current operating performance and, as such, these items are excluded from our determination of OFG.
(2)	Represents components of net income (loss) related to the estimated changes in the values of our interest rate swap derivatives. We have excluded these changes in value from our evaluation of the operating performance of the Company and OFG because we expect to hold the underlying instruments to their maturity and accordingly the interim gains or losses will remain unrealized.
(3)	Represents the portion of the acquisition and asset management fees that are paid in equity, which we expect will be settled in the future using proceeds from the sale of properties or other non-operating sources, and which we therefore do not consider in evaluating the operating performance of the Company and determining OFG. See “Critical Accounting Policies — Treatment of Management Compensation, Expense Reimbursements and Operating Partnership Participation Interest” for additional information.

128

(4) Includes the following components of revenues and expenses that we do not consider in evaluating the operating performance of the Company and determining OFG for year ended December 31, 2008 (in thousands):

	Year Ended December 31, 2008
Straight-line rent adjustment(a)	$	(16,388	)
Amortization of lease incentives(b)		4,218
Amortization of out-of-market leases(b)		(4,336	)
Amortization of deferred financing costs(b)		1,699
Other		1,376
	$	(13,431	)

____________

a) Represents the adjustments to rental revenue as required by GAAP to recognize minimum lease payments on a straight-line basis over the respective lease terms. We have excluded these adjustments from our evaluation of the operating performance of the Company and in determining OFG because we believe that the rent that is billable during the current period is a more relevant measure of the Company’s operating performance for such period.

b) Represents the amortization of lease incentives, out-of-market leases and deferred financing costs. As stated in Note 1 above, historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, we believe that such amortization may be of limited relevance in evaluating current operating performance and, as such, these items are excluded from our determination of OFG.

(5)	Includes master lease rents related to master leases entered into in conjunction with certain asset acquisitions. In accordance with GAAP, these rents are not included in rental revenue; however, we consider this rent in evaluating the operating performance of the Company and determining OFG.
(6)	Represents organizational and offering expenses and acquisition fees paid to our Advisor that are expensed in our condensed consolidated statements of operations. We fund such costs with proceeds from our offering and acquisition-related indebtedness, and therefore do not consider these expenses in evaluating the operating performance of the Company and determining OFG.
(7)	Includes adjustments to equity in losses of unconsolidated entities, net, similar to those described in Notes 1, 4 and 5 above for our unconsolidated entities, which are necessary to convert the Company’s share of income (loss) from unconsolidated entities to OFG.
(8)	Includes all adjustments to eliminate the minority interests’ share of the adjustments to convert the Company’s net income (loss) to OFG.

Set forth below is additional information related to certain items excluded from the analysis above which may be helpful in assessing our operating results:

• We received $4.0 million in net proceeds from our sale of the Williams Tower waterwall and park in December 2008.

• Pursuant to the terms of the Grocery Anchored Portfolio joint venture agreement, we earned distributions of approximately $161,000 in excess of our pro-rata share of the joint venture’s OFG.

Related-Party Transactions and Agreements

We have entered into agreements with the Advisor, Dealer Manager and Hines or its affiliates, whereby we pay certain fees and reimbursements to these entities, including acquisition fees, selling commissions, dealer-manager fees, asset and property management fees, construction management fees, reimbursement of organizational and offering costs, and reimbursement of certain operating costs, as described previously.

129

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Contractual Obligations

The following table lists our known contractual obligations as of December 31, 2008. Specifically included are our obligations under long-term debt agreements, operating lease agreements and outstanding purchase obligations (in thousands):

	Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligation	Less Than 1 Year		1 - 3 Years		3 - 5 Years		More than 5 Years		Total
Notes payable(1)	$	188,434	$	206,710	$	739,106	$	893,559	$	2,027,809
Ground lease obligation		412		848		882		9,888		12,030
Obligation to purchase Grocery-Anchored Portfolio properties		46,400		—		—		—		46,400
Total contractual obligations	$	235,246	$	207,558	$	739,988	$	903,447	$	2,086,239

____________

(1)	Notes payable includes principal and interest payments on mortgage agreements and principal payments related to the revolving credit facility outstanding as December 31, 2008. Interest payments due to HSH Nordbank were determined using effective interest rates which were fixed as a result of interest rate swaps.
(2)	Excluded from the table above is the settlement of the $45.4 million liability related to the Participation Interest. Although we expect to settle this liability in the future, we are not currently able to estimate the date on which the settlement will occur.

Recent Developments and Subsequent Events

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Market risk is the exposure to loss resulting from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and equity prices. The primary risks in pursuing our business plan are interest rate risk and foreign currency exchange risk.

We are exposed to the effects of interest rate changes primarily as a result of our revolving credit facility, which bears interest at a variable rate. We typically use this facility on a short-term basis to maintain liquidity and fund expansion of our real estate investment portfolio and operations. As of December 31, 2008, we had $16.0 million outstanding under this facility, and the weighted average interest rate on outstanding borrowings was 1.8%. Annual interest expense would increase $160,000 for every 1% increase in interest rates on this balance.

As of December 31, 2008, we also had $520.0 million of debt outstanding under our HSH Credit Facility, which is a variable-rate pooled mortgage facility. However, as a result of the interest rate swap agreements entered into with HSH Nordbank, these borrowings effectively bear interest at fixed rates ranging from 5.25% to 6.03%. We are exposed to credit risk of the counterparty to these interest rate swap agreements in the event of non-performance under the terms of the derivative contracts. In the event of non-performance by the counterparty, we would be subject to the variability of interest rates on the debt outstanding under the HSH Credit Facility to which our outstanding interest rate swaps relate. Please see “Debt Financings” above for more information concerning the Company’s outstanding debt.

We currently have investments in Canada and Brazil and as a result are subject to risk from the effects of exchange rate movements of foreign currencies, which may affect future costs and cash flows. For all currencies we are currently a net receiver of the foreign currency (we receive more cash than we pay out), and therefore our foreign operations benefit from a weaker U.S. dollar and are adversely affected by a stronger U.S. dollar relative to the foreign currency. During 2008 we recorded a loss on foreign currency transactions of approximately $2,000 in our consolidated statement of operations. During the year ended December 31, 2007, we recorded a gain on foreign currency transactions of approximately $134,000 in our consolidated statement of operations. Generally, we have not entered into any foreign currency forwa rd exchange contracts to hedge the effects of adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. We have obtained non-recourse mortgage financing at a fixed rate of interest in the local currency related to our property in Toronto, Canada.

130

To the extent that currency fluctuations increase or decrease net operating income as translated to U.S. dollars, the change in debt service, as translated to U.S. dollars, will partially offset the effect of fluctuations in net operating income, and, to some extent, mitigate the risk from changes in foreign currency rates. Based on the Company’s current operational strategies, management does not believe that variations in the foreign currency exchange rates pose a significant risk to our consolidated results of operations or financial position.

Shareholder Redemptions

During 2009, we have experienced an increase in share redemptions. From January 1, 2009 to April 1, 2009, pursuant to our share redemption plan, we made payments totaling $84.7 million to shareholders who had requested redemptions. Our board of directors elected to waive the monthly limitation provided by our redemption plan for shares redeemed on March 2, 2009 and April 1, 2009 and accordingly, all redemption requests were fully funded. Cash used to fund redemptions reduces our liquidity available to fund acquisitions of real estate investments and other cash needs. We can not assure you that we will be able to fully fund redemptions in the future.

Beginning with shares redeemed in March 2009 under our share redemption program, shares have been redeemed at a price of $9.15 per share rather than at our prior redemption price of $9.68 per share.

Other

From January 1, 2009 through March 20, 2009, we have received gross offering proceeds of $62.4 million from the sale of 6.2 million common shares, including $17.3 million of gross proceeds relating to 1.7 million shares sold under our dividend reinvestment plan. As of March 20, 2009, 2,818.9 million common shares remained available for sale to the public pursuant to the Third Offering, exclusive of $465.3 million common shares available under our dividend reinvestment plan.

From January 1, 2009 through March 20, 2009, we incurred $204.0 million of additional borrowings under our revolving credit facility all of which was outstanding as of March 20, 2009.

On March 11, 2009, we had a $91.0 million mortgage loan which matured, and the non-payment of this loan at maturity created a non-monetary default under our revolving credit facility. We were granted an extension which was set to expire on April 23, 2009 to cure this default while we were negotiating a modification to the loan documents to provide for an extension of the maturity of such loan. On April 16, 2009, we executed a modification to the $91.0 million mortgage and pursuant to the terms of the modification, the maturity of the mortgage was extended to March 11, 2010 with the option for an additional 6-month extension subject to certain conditions. Concurrently, we made a principal payment of approximately $13.1 million to reduce the outstanding principal balance to $77.9 million. In additi on, because the modification was executed prior to the expiration of the extension that was previously granted to us, it cured the related non-monetary default under our revolving credit agreement, so we are back in compliance under our credit facility. All other significant terms and covenants of the loan remained the same, including the interest rate of 4.775%.

Change in Offering Prices

Effective January 26, 2009, our board of directors authorized the following changes to the terms of the Third Offering:

• Decreased the offering price of shares of our common stock from $10.66 per share to $10.08 per share.

• Decreased the price at which shares will be issued pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan from $10.13 per share to $9.58 per share.

• Beginning with shares redeemed in March 2009 under our redemption program, the share redemption price decreased from $9.68 per share to $9.15 per share.

131

DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK

We were formed as a corporation under the laws of the State of Maryland. The rights of our shareholders are governed by Maryland law as well as our charter and bylaws. The following summary of the terms of our common shares is a summary of all material provisions concerning our common shares and you should refer to the Maryland General Corporation Law and our charter and bylaws for a full description. The following summary is qualified in its entirety by the more detailed information contained in our charter and bylaws. Copies of our charter and bylaws are incorporated by reference as exhibits to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part. You can obtain copies of our charter and bylaws and every other exhibit to our registration statement. Please see “Where You Can Find More Information” below.

Our charter authorizes us to issue up to 1,500,000,000 common shares, $0.001 par value per share, and 500,000,000 preferred shares, $0.001 par value per share. As of April 1, 2009, 201.7 million common shares were issued and outstanding. As of the date of this prospectus, we had no preferred shares issued and outstanding. Our board of directors may amend our charter to increase or decrease the amount of our authorized shares without any action by our shareholders. See “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” for disclosure of the number and percentage of our outstanding common shares owned by our officers and directors.

Our charter and bylaws contain certain provisions that could make it more difficult to acquire control of the Company by means of a tender offer, a proxy contest or otherwise. These provisions are expected to discourage certain types of coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids and to encourage persons seeking to acquire control of the Company to negotiate first with our board of directors. The Company believes that these provisions increase the likelihood that any such proposals initially will be on more attractive terms than would be the case in their absence and will facilitate negotiations which may result in improvement of the terms of an initial offer.

Common Shares

Subject to any preferential rights of any other class or series of shares and to the provisions of our charter regarding the restriction on the transfer of our common shares, the holders of common shares are entitled to such dividends as may be authorized from time to time by our board of directors and declared by us out of legally available funds and, upon liquidation, are entitled to receive all assets available for distribution to our shareholders. Upon issuance for full payment in accordance with the terms of this offering, all common shares issued in the offering will be fully paid and non-assessable. Holders of common shares will not have preemptive rights, which means that they will not have an automatic option to purchase any new shares that we issue. We currently have only one class of common shares, which have equal dividend, distribution, liquidation and other rights.

Subject to the limitations described in our charter, our board of directors, without any action by our shareholders, may classify or reclassify any of our unissued common shares into one or more classes or series by setting or changing the preferences, conversion, restrictions or other rights.

We will not issue certificates for our shares. Shares will be held in “uncertificated” form, which will eliminate the physical handling and safekeeping responsibilities inherent in owning transferable stock certificates and eliminate the need to return a duly executed stock certificate to effect a transfer. DST Systems Inc. acts as our registrar and as the transfer agent for our shares. A transfer of your shares can be effected simply by mailing to DST Systems Inc. a transfer and assignment form, which we will provide to you upon written request. A transfer fee of $50.00 is charged by our transfer agent in order to implement any such transfer of your shares.

132

Preferred Shares

Upon the affirmative vote of a majority of our directors, our charter authorizes our board of directors to issue one or more classes or series of preferred shares without shareholder approval and our charter provides that the issuance of preferred shares must also be approved by a majority of our independent directors who do not have an interest in the transaction and who have access, at our expense, to our legal counsel or to independent legal counsel. Further, our charter authorizes the board to fix the voting rights, liquidation preferences, dividend rates, conversion rights, redemption rights and terms, including sinking fund provisions, and certain other rights and preferences with respect to such preferred shares. Because our board of directors has the power to establish the preferences and rights of each class or series of prefe rred shares, it may afford the holders of any series or class of preferred shares preferences, powers, and rights senior to the rights of holders of common shares. However, the voting rights per preferred share of any series or class of preferred shares sold in a private offering may not exceed voting rights which bear the same relationship to the voting rights of common shares as the consideration paid to the Company for each privately-held preferred share bears to the book value of each outstanding common share. In addition, a majority of our independent directors must approve the issuance of preferred shares to our Advisor or one of its affiliates. If we ever created and issued preferred shares with a dividend preference over our common shares, payment of any dividend preferences of outstanding preferred shares would reduce the amount of funds available for the payment of dividends on the common shares. Further, holders of preferred shares are normally entitled to receive a preference payment in the event we liquidate, dissolve or wind up before any payment is made to the common shareholders, likely reducing the amount common shareholders would otherwise receive upon such an occurrence.

Under certain circumstances, the issuance of preferred shares may delay, prevent, render more difficult or tend to discourage:

• a merger, offer or proxy contest;

• the assumption of control by a holder of a large block of our securities; or

• the removal of incumbent management.

Our board of directors, without shareholder approval, may issue preferred shares with voting and conversion rights that could adversely affect the holders of common shares, subject to the limits described above. We currently have no preferred shares issued and outstanding. Our board of directors has no present plans to issue preferred shares, but may do so at any time in the future without shareholder approval.

Meetings and Special Voting Requirements

Each shareholder is entitled at each meeting of shareholders to one vote per share owned by such shareholder on all matters submitted to a vote of shareholders, including the election of directors. There is no cumulative voting in the election of our board of directors, which means that the holders of a majority of our outstanding common shares can elect all of the directors then standing for election and the holders of the remaining common shares will not be able to elect any directors.

An annual meeting of our shareholders will be held each year, at least 30 days after delivery of our annual report. Special meetings of shareholders may be called only upon the request of a majority of our directors, a majority of our independent directors, our chief executive officer, our president or upon the written request of shareholders holding at least 10% of the common shares entitled to vote at such meeting. The presence of a majority of our outstanding shares, either in person or by proxy, constitutes a quorum. Generally, the affirmative vote of a majority of all votes cast at a meeting at which a quorum is present is necessary to take shareholder action authorized by our charter, except that a majority of the votes represented in person or by proxy at a meeting at which a quorum is present is sufficient to elect a direc tor.

133

Under the Maryland General Corporation Law and our charter, shareholders are generally entitled to vote at a duly held meeting at which a quorum is present on:

• amendments to our charter and the election of directors (except as otherwise provided in our charter or under the Maryland General Corporation Law);

• our liquidation or dissolution;

• a merger, consolidation or sale or other disposition of substantially all of our assets; and

• a termination of our status as a REIT.

No such action can be taken by our board of directors without a vote of our shareholders holding at least a majority of our outstanding shares or, in the case of director elections, a majority of our outstanding shares present in person or by proxy at a meeting at which a quorum is present. Shareholders are not entitled to exercise any of the rights of an objecting shareholder provided for in Title 3, Subtitle 2 of the Maryland General Corporation Law unless our board of directors determines that such rights shall apply with respect to all or any classes or series of shares, to a particular transaction or all transactions occurring after the date of such determination in connection with which shareholders would otherwise be entitled to exercise such rights.

Shareholders are entitled to receive a copy of our shareholder list upon request. The list provided by us will include each shareholder’s name, address and telephone number, if available, and number of shares owned by each shareholder and will be sent within ten days of the receipt by us of the request. A shareholder requesting a list will be required to pay reasonable costs of postage and duplication. We have the right to request that a requesting shareholder represent to us that the list will not be used to pursue commercial interests. Shareholders are also entitled to access, upon request and on the terms described above, to the comparable records of the Operating Partnership.

In addition to the foregoing, shareholders have rights under Rule 14a-7 under the Exchange Act, which provides that, upon the request of shareholders and the payment of the expenses of the distribution, we are required to distribute specific materials to our shareholders in the context of the solicitation of proxies for voting on matters presented to our shareholders or, at our option, provide requesting shareholders with a copy of the list of shareholders so that the requesting shareholders may make the distribution of proxies themselves.

Restrictions on Transfer

To qualify as a REIT under the Code:

• five or fewer individuals (as defined in the Code to include certain tax exempt organizations and trusts) may not own, directly or indirectly, more than 50% in value of our outstanding shares during the last half of a taxable year; and

• 100 or more persons must beneficially own our shares during at least 335 days of a taxable year of 12 months or during a proportionate part of a shorter taxable year.

You should read the “Material Tax Considerations” section of this prospectus for further discussion of this topic. We may prohibit certain acquisitions and transfers of shares so as to ensure our continued qualification as a REIT under the Code. However, we cannot assure you that this prohibition will be effective. Because we believe it is essential for us to qualify as a REIT, our charter provides (subject to certain exceptions) that no shareholder other than Hines or its affiliates may own, or be deemed to own by virtue of the attribution provisions of the Code, more than (i) 9.9% of the value (as determined in good faith by our board of directors) of the aggregate of our outstanding shares or (ii) more than 9.9% in value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of the aggregate number of shares of an y class or series. Our board of directors may waive this ownership limit if evidence satisfactory to our directors and our tax counsel is presented that such ownership will not then or in the future jeopardize our status as a REIT. Also, these restrictions on transferability and ownership will not apply if our directors determine, with the approval of our shareholders as required by our charter, that it is no longer in our best interests to continue to qualify as a REIT.

Additionally, the transfer or issuance of our shares or any security convertible into our shares will be transferred to a charitable trust or will be null and void, and the intended transferee will acquire no rights to our shares (unless the transfer is approved by our board of directors based upon receipt of information that such transfer would not violate the provisions of the Code for qualification as a REIT), if such transfer or issuance:

134

• creates a direct or indirect ownership of our shares in excess of the 9.9% ownership limit described above;

• with respect to transfers only, results in our shares being owned by fewer than 100 persons;

• results in us being “closely held” within the meaning of Section 856(h) of the Code;

• results in us owning, directly or indirectly, more than 9.9% of the ownership interests in any tenant or subtenant; or

• results in our disqualification as a REIT.

Our charter provides that any shares proposed to be transferred pursuant to a transfer which, if consummated, would violate these restrictions on transfer, will be deemed to be transferred to a trust to be held for the exclusive benefit of a charitable beneficiary. To avoid confusion, these shares will be referred to in this prospectus as “Excess Securities.” Excess Securities will remain issued and outstanding shares and will be entitled to the same rights and privileges as all other shares of the same class or series. The trustee of the beneficial trust, as record holder of the Excess Securities, will be entitled to receive all dividends and distributions authorized by the board of directors on such securities for the benefit of the charitable beneficiary. Our charter further entitles the trustee of the beneficial trust t o vote all Excess Securities.

The trustee of the beneficial trust may select a transferee to whom the securities may be sold as long as such sale does not violate the 9.9% ownership limit or the other restrictions on transfer. Upon sale of the Excess Securities, the intended transferee (the transferee of the Excess Securities whose ownership would violate the 9.9% ownership limit or the other restrictions on transfer) will receive from the trustee of the beneficial trust the lesser of such sale proceeds, or the price per share the intended transferee paid for the Excess Securities (or, in the case of a gift or devise to the intended transferee, the price per share equal to the market value per share on the date of the transfer to the intended transferee). The trustee of the beneficial trust will distribute to the charitable beneficiary any amount the trustee receiv es in excess of the amount to be paid to the intended transferee.

Any person who (i) acquires or attempts to acquire shares in violation of the foregoing ownership restriction, transfers or receives shares subject to such limitations or would have owned shares that resulted in a transfer to a charitable trust is required to give immediate written notice to us of such event, or (ii) proposed or attempted any of the transactions in clause (i) is required to give us 15 days’ written notice prior to such transaction. In both cases, such persons must provide to us such other information as we may request in order to determine the effect, if any, of such transfer on our status as a REIT. The foregoing restrictions will continue to apply until our board of directors determines it is no longer in our best interest to continue to qualify as a REIT, and there is an affirmative vote of the majority of shares entitled to vote on such matter at a regular or special meeting of our shareholders.

The ownership restriction does not apply to an offeror who, in accordance with applicable federal and state securities laws, makes a cash tender offer, where at least 85% of the outstanding shares are duly tendered and accepted pursuant to the cash tender offer. The ownership restriction also does not apply to the underwriter in a public offering of shares or to a person or persons so exempted from the ownership limit by our board of directors based upon appropriate assurances that our qualification as a REIT is not jeopardized. Any person who owns 5.0% or more of the outstanding shares during any taxable year will be asked to deliver a statement or affidavit setting forth the number of shares beneficially owned, directly or indirectly.

In addition, we have the right to purchase any Excess Securities at the lesser of the price per share paid in the transfer that created the Excess Securities or the current market price until the Excess Securities are sold by the trustee of the beneficial trust. An intended transferee must pay, upon demand, to the trustee of the beneficial trust (for the benefit of the beneficial trust) the amount of any dividend or distribution we pay to an intended transferee on Excess Securities prior to our discovery that such Excess Securities have been transferred in violation of the provisions of the charter.

135

Distribution Objectives

We receive cash flow from our investments in real estate which we expect will allow us to pay dividends to our shareholders. We intend to authorize and calculate dividends on a daily basis and aggregate and pay them on a quarterly basis. If our board of directors has authorized and we have declared dividends, investors are entitled to earn distributions immediately upon purchasing our shares. Because all of our operations are performed indirectly through the Operating Partnership, our ability to pay dividends depends on the Operating Partnership’s ability to pay distributions to its partners, including Hines REIT. Dividends are paid to our shareholders as of record dates selected by our board of directors. We expect to pay dividends unless our results of operations, our general financial condition, general economic conditions or other factors inhibit us from doing so. Dividends are authorized at the discretion of our board of directors, which will be directed, in substantial part, by its obligation to cause us to comply with the REIT requirements of the Code. Our ability to pay dividends may be affected by a number of factors, including:

• our Advisor’s ability to identify and execute investment opportunities at a pace consistent with capital we raise;

• our operating and interest expenses;

• the ability of tenants to meet their obligations under the leases associated with our properties;

• amount of distributions or dividends received by us from our indirect real estate investments such as the Core Fund;

• our ability to keep our properties occupied;

• our ability to maintain or increase rental rates when renewing or replacing current leases;

• capital expenditures and reserves therefor;

• leasing commissions and tenant inducements for leasing space;

• the issuance of additional shares; and

• financings and refinancings.

We must distribute to our shareholders at least 90% of our annual ordinary taxable income in order to continue to meet the requirements for being treated as a REIT under the Code. This requirement is described in greater detail in the “Material Tax Considerations — Requirements for Qualification as a REIT — Operational Requirements — Annual Distribution Requirement” section of this prospectus. Our directors may authorize dividends in excess of this percentage as they deem appropriate. Differences in timing between the receipt of income and the payment of expenses, and the effect of required debt payments, among other things, could require us to borrow funds from third parties on a short-term basis, issue new securities or sell assets to meet the distribution requirements that are necessary t o achieve the tax benefits associated with qualifying as a REIT. These methods of obtaining funding could affect future distributions by increasing operating costs. We refer you to the “Risk Factors — Business and Real Estate Risks — We may need to incur borrowings that would otherwise not be incurred to meet REIT minimum distribution requirements” and “Material Tax Considerations — Requirements for Qualification as a REIT” sections in this prospectus.

The table below outlines our total distributions declared to shareholders and minority interests for each of the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, including the breakout between the distributions paid in cash and those reinvested pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan (all amounts are in thousands).

136

	Shareholders						Minority Interest
Year Ended	Cash Distributions		Dividends Reinvested		Total Declared		Total Declared
December 31, 2008	$	52,297	$	64,740	$	117,037	$	3,065
December 31, 2007	$	34,092	$	44,401	$	78,493	$	1,919
December 31, 2006	$	11,443	$	18,397	$	29,840	$	1,112

For each of the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, we funded our cash distributions with cash flows from operating activities and distributions received from our unconsolidated investments.

Share Redemption Program

Our shares are currently not listed on a national securities exchange and we currently do not intend to list our shares. In order to provide our shareholders with some liquidity, we have a share redemption program. Generally, shareholders who have held their shares for at least one year may receive the benefit of limited liquidity by presenting for redemption all or a portion of their shares to us in accordance with the procedures outlined herein. At that time, we may, subject to the conditions and limitations described below, redeem the shares presented for redemption for cash to the extent that we have sufficient funds available to us to fund such redemption. We will not pay the Advisor or its affiliates any fees to complete any transactions under our share redemption program.

Prior to the time, if any, as our shares are listed on a national securities exchange, subject to the conditions and limitations described herein, any shareholder that has held shares for at least one year since the date of their acquisition, and who (i) purchased those shares from us, (ii) received the shares through a non-cash transaction, not in the secondary market or (iii) purchased the shares from another shareholder prior to January 11, 2009, may present all or any portion of such shares to us for redemption at any time.

To the extent our board of directors determines that we have sufficient available cash flow for redemptions, we intend to redeem shares on a monthly basis; however, our board of directors may determine from time to time to adjust the timing of redemptions upon 30 days’ notice. Monthly share redemptions are limited to 1/12th of 10% of the shares outstanding as of the prior calendar year-end; provided, however, that our board of directors retains the right to redeem additional shares if, in its sole discretion, it determines that it is in the best interests of the Company to do so based on available cash flow and other factors. In no event during any calendar year will the number of shares we redeem exceed, as of the date of any such redemption, 10% of the shares outstanding as of the same date in the prior calendar year. We may, but are not required to, use available cash flow not otherwise dedicated to a particular use to meet these redemption needs, including cash proceeds generated from the dividend reinvestment plan, securities offerings (including this offering), operating cash flow not intended for dividends, borrowings and capital transactions such as asset sales or refinancings.

During the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, we redeemed $58.7 million, $10.6 million and $2.3 million in shares, respectively. During these years, all shareholder requests for redemptions were fully funded out of proceeds from our dividend reinvestment plan. During 2009, we have experienced an increase in share redemptions. From January 1, 2009 to April 1, 2009, pursuant to our share redemption plan, we made payments totaling $84.7 million to shareholders which were funded out of proceeds from our dividend reinvestment plan and primary offering. Our board of directors elected to waive the monthly limitation provided by our redemption plan for shares redeemed on March 2, 2009 and April 1, 2009. Cash used to fund redemptions reduces our liquidity available to fund acquisitions of real estate investments and other cash needs. We can not assure you that we will be able to fully fund redemptions in the future.

Shares may be redeemed at a price of $9.15 per share. The redemption price was determined by our board of directors. Our board’s determination of the redemption price was subjective and was primarily based on our estimated per-share net asset value as determined by our management. Our management estimated our per-share net asset value using valuations of our real estate assets and notes payable as of December 31, 2008, which were determined by independent third parties (except for assets acquired within the last year for which we used aggregate cost). Management estimated the values of our other assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2008, and then made various adjustments and estimations in order to account for our operations and other factors occurring or expected to occur between December 31, 2008 and the eff ective date of this pricing change. In addition, our board of directors also considered our historical and anticipated results of operations and financial condition, our current and anticipated distribution payments, yields and offering prices of other real estate companies we deem to be substantially similar to us, our current and anticipated capital and debt structure, and our management’s and Advisor’s recommendations and assessment of our prospects and expected execution of our investment and operating strategies.

137

The valuations of our real estate assets and notes payable, as well as the methodology utilized by our management in estimating our per-share net asset value, were based on a number of assumptions and estimates that may not be accurate or complete. No liquidity discounts or discounts relating to the fact that we are currently externally managed were applied to our estimated per-share valuation, and no attempt was made to value Hines REIT as an enterprise. Likewise, the valuation was not reduced by potential selling commissions or other costs of sale, which would impact proceeds in the case of a liquidation. The redemption price may not be indicative of the price our shareholders could receive if they sold our shares, if our shares were actively traded or if we were liquidated.

Our board of directors may adjust the per-share redemption price from time to time upon 30 days’ written notice based on our then-current estimated per-share net asset value at the time of the adjustment, and such other factors as it deems appropriate, including the then-current offering price of our shares (if any) and the other factors described above, our then-current dividend reinvestment plan price and general market conditions. At any time we are engaged in an offering of shares, the per-share price for shares purchased under our redemption program will always be equal to or lower than the applicable per-share offering price. Real estate asset and notes payable values fluctuate, which in the future may result in an increase or decrease in our net asset value. Thus, future adjustments to our per-share net asset value co uld result in a higher or lower redemption price. The members of our board of directors must, in accordance with their fiduciary duties, act in a manner they believe is in the best interests of our shareholders when making any decision to adjust the redemption price offered under our share redemption program. Our board of directors will announce any price adjustment and the time period of its effectiveness as a part of our regular communications with shareholders. Please see “Reports to Shareholders.”

We will redeem shares presented for cash to the extent we have sufficient available cash flow to do so. Our board of directors may terminate, suspend or amend the share redemption program at any time upon 30 days’ written notice without shareholder approval if our directors believe such action is in our and our shareholders’ best interests, or if they determine the funds otherwise available to fund our share redemption program are needed for other purposes. In the event of a redemption request after the death or disability (as defined in the Code) of a shareholder, we may waive the one-year holding period requirement as well as the annual limitation on the number of shares that will be redeemed as summarized above. In addition, in the event a shareholder is having all his shares redeemed, the one-year holding requireme nt will be waived for shares purchased under our dividend reinvestment plan.

All requests for redemption must be made in writing and received by us at least five business days prior to the end of the month. You may also withdraw your request to have your shares redeemed. Withdrawal requests must also be made in writing and received by us at least five business days prior to the end of the month. If the number of our shares subject to redemption requests exceeds the limitations described above, or our available cash flow is insufficient to meet such requests, each shareholder’s redemption request will be reduced on a pro rata basis. We cannot guarantee that we will accommodate all requests made in any month. If we cannot accommodate all requests in a given month, you can withdraw your request for redemption or request in writing that we honor it in a successive month. Such pending requests will generally b e honored on a pro-rata basis with any new redemption requests we receive in the applicable period.

Commitments by us to repurchase shares will be communicated either telephonically or in writing to each shareholder who submitted a request at or promptly (no more than five business days) after the fifth business day following the end of each month. We will redeem the shares subject to these commitments, and pay the redemption price associated therewith, within three business days following the delivery of such commitments. You will not relinquish your shares until we redeem them. Please see “Risk Factors — Investment Risks — Your ability to have your shares redeemed is limited under our share redemption program, and if you are able to have your shares redeemed, it may be at a price that is less than the price you paid for the shares and the then-current market value of the shares....” and “Risk Factors — Investment Risks — There is currently no public market for our common shares, and we do not intend to list the shares on a stock exchange. Therefore, it will likely be difficult for you to sell your shares and, if you are able to sell your shares, you will likely sell them at a substantial discount. The price of our common shares may be adjusted to a price less than the price you paid for your shares.”

138

The shares we redeem under our share redemption program will be cancelled and will have the status of authorized but unissued shares. We will not resell such shares to the public unless such sales are first registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act and under appropriate state securities laws or are exempt under such laws. We will terminate our share redemption program in the event that our shares ever become listed on a national securities exchange or in the event a secondary market for our common shares develops.

Restrictions on Roll-Up Transactions

Our charter contains various limitations on our ability to participate in Roll-up Transactions. In connection with any proposed transaction considered a “Roll-up Transaction” involving us and the issuance of securities of an entity (a “Roll-up Entity”) that would be created or would survive after the successful completion of the Roll-up Transaction, an appraisal of all our properties must be obtained from a competent independent appraiser. The properties must be appraised on a consistent basis, and the appraisal shall be based on the evaluation of all relevant information and shall indicate the value of the properties as of a date immediately prior to the announcement of the proposed Roll-up Transaction. The appraisal shall assume an orderly liquidation of our properties over a 12-month period. The terms of the engagement of the independent appraiser must clearly state that the engagement is for our benefit and that of our shareholders. A summary of the appraisal, indicating all material assumptions underlying the appraisal, shall be included in a report to our shareholders in connection with any proposed Roll-up Transaction. If the appraisal will be included in a prospectus used to offer the securities of a Roll-up Entity, the appraisal will be filed as an exhibit to the registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission and with any state where such securities are registered.

A “Roll-up Transaction” is a transaction involving the acquisition, merger, conversion or consolidation, directly or indirectly, of us and the issuance of securities of a Roll-up Entity. This term does not include:

• a transaction involving our securities that have been listed on a national securities exchange or included for quotation on a national market system for at least 12 months; or

• a transaction involving our conversion into a limited liability company, trust, or association form if, as a consequence of the transaction, there will be no significant adverse change in any of the following: our shareholder voting rights; the term of our existence; compensation to our Advisor or our sponsor; or our investment objectives.

In connection with a proposed Roll-up Transaction, the person sponsoring the Roll-up Transaction must offer to our shareholders who vote “no” on the proposal the choice of:

• accepting the securities of the Roll-up Entity offered in the proposed Roll-up Transaction; or

• one of the following:

• remaining as shareholders and preserving their interests on the same terms and conditions as existed previously; or

• receiving cash in an amount equal to the shareholder’s pro rata share of the appraised value of our net assets.

139

We are prohibited from participating in any proposed Roll-up Transaction:

• that would result in our shareholders having democracy rights in a Roll-up Entity that are less than those provided in our charter and described elsewhere in this prospectus, including rights with respect to the election and removal of directors, annual reports, annual and special meetings, amendment of our charter and our dissolution;

• that includes provisions that would operate to materially impede or frustrate the accumulation of shares by any purchaser of the securities of the Roll-up Entity, except to the minimum extent necessary to preserve the tax status of the Roll-up Entity, or which would limit the ability of an investor to exercise the voting rights of its securities of the Roll-up Entity on the basis of the number of shares held by that investor;

• in which investor’s rights to access of records of the Roll-up Entity will be less than those provided in the section of this prospectus entitled “Description of Capital Stock”; or

• in which any of the costs of the Roll-up Transaction would be borne by us if the Roll-up Transaction is not approved by our shareholders.

Shareholder Liability

Both the Maryland General Corporation Law and our charter provide that our shareholders are not liable personally or individually in any manner whatsoever for any debt, act, omission or obligation incurred by us or our board of directors.

The Maryland General Corporation Law provides that our shareholders are under no obligation to us or our creditors with respect to their shares other than the obligation to pay to us the full amount of the consideration for which their shares were issued.

Dividend Reinvestment Plan

We currently have a dividend reinvestment plan available that allows you to have dividends otherwise payable to you invested in additional common shares. During this offering, you may purchase common shares under our dividend reinvestment plan, currently at a price of $9.58 per share. Our board of directors may change the price per share for shares issued under the plan upon 10 days’ notice based on the consideration of numerous factors, including the then-current offering price of our shares to the public (if any). No sales commissions or dealer manager fees will be paid in connection with shares purchased pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan. A copy of our dividend reinvestment plan as currently in effect is included as Appendix B to this prospectus.

Investors participating in our dividend reinvestment plan may purchase fractional shares. If sufficient common shares are not available for issuance under our dividend reinvestment plan, we will remit excess dividends in cash to the participants. If you elect to participate in the dividend reinvestment plan, you must agree that, if at any time you fail to meet the applicable investor suitability standards or cannot make the other investor representations or warranties set forth in the then current prospectus, the subscription agreement or our charter relating to such investment, you will promptly notify us in writing of that fact.

Shareholders purchasing common shares pursuant to the dividend reinvestment plan will have the same rights and will be treated in the same manner as if such common shares were purchased pursuant to this offering.

Following the reinvestment, we will send each participant a written confirmation showing the amount of the dividend reinvested in our shares, the number of common shares owned prior to the reinvestment, and the total amount of common shares owned after the dividend reinvestment. We have the discretion not to provide a dividend reinvestment plan, and a majority of our board of directors may amend or terminate our dividend reinvestment plan for any reason at any time upon 10 days’ prior notice to the participants. Your participation in the plan will also be terminated to the extent that a reinvestment of your dividends in our common shares would cause the percentage ownership limitation contained in our charter to be exceeded. Otherwise, unless you terminate your participation in our dividend reinvestment plan in writing, your participation will continue even if the shares to be issued under the plan are registered in a future registration or the price of our dividend reinvestment plan shares is changed. You may terminate your participation in the dividend reinvestment plan at any time by providing us with 10 days’ written notice. A withdrawal from participation in the dividend reinvestment plan will be effective only with respect to dividends paid more than 30 days after receipt of written notice. Generally, a transfer of common shares will terminate the shareholder’s participation in the dividend reinvestment plan as of the first day of the quarter in which the transfer is effective.

140

If you participate in our dividend reinvestment plan and are subject to federal income taxation, you will incur a tax liability for dividends allocated to you even though you have elected not to receive the dividends in cash, but rather to have the dividends withheld and reinvested in our common shares. Specifically, you will be treated as if you have received the dividend from us in cash and then applied such dividend to the purchase of additional common shares. You will be taxed on the amount of such dividend as ordinary income to the extent such dividend is from current or accumulated earnings and profits, unless we have designated all or a portion of the dividend as a capital gain dividend. In addition, the difference between the public offering price of our shares and the amount paid for shares purchased pursuant to our dividend r einvestment plan may be deemed to be taxable as income to participants in the plan. Please see “Risk Factors — Tax Risks — Investors may realize taxable income without receiving cash dividends.”

Business Combinations

The Maryland General Corporation Law prohibits certain business combinations between a Maryland corporation and an interested shareholder or the interested shareholder’s affiliate for five years after the most recent date on which the shareholder becomes an interested shareholder. These provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law will not apply, however, to business combinations that are approved or exempted by the board of directors of the corporation prior to the time that the interested shareholder becomes an interested shareholder. As permitted by the Maryland General Corporation Law, Section 5.9 of our charter provides that the business combination provisions of Maryland law do not apply to us.

Control Share Acquisitions

With some exceptions, Maryland law provides that control shares of a Maryland corporation acquired in a control share acquisition have no voting rights except to the extent approved by a vote of two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter, excluding “control shares”:

• owned by the acquiring person;

• owned by officers; and

• owned by employees who are also directors.

“Control shares” mean voting shares which, if aggregated with all other voting shares owned by an acquiring person or shares on which the acquiring person can exercise or direct the exercise of voting power, would entitle the acquiring person to exercise voting power in electing directors within one of the following ranges of voting power:

• one-tenth or more but less than one-third;

• one-third or more but less than a majority; or

• a majority or more of all voting power.

Control shares do not include shares the acquiring person is then entitled to vote as a result of having previously obtained shareholder approval. A control share acquisition occurs when, subject to some exceptions, a person directly or indirectly acquires ownership or the power to direct the exercise of voting power (except solely by virtue of a revocable proxy) of issued and outstanding control shares. A person who has made or proposes to make a control share acquisition, upon satisfaction of some specific conditions, including an undertaking to pay expenses, may compel our board of directors to call a special meeting of our shareholders to be held within 50 days of a demand to consider the voting rights of the control shares. If no request for a meeting is made, we may present the question at any shareholders’ meeting.

141

If voting rights are not approved at the meeting or if the acquiring person does not deliver an acquiring person statement as required by the statute, then, subject to some conditions and limitations, we may redeem any or all of the control shares (except those for which voting rights have been previously been approved) for fair value determined, without regard to the absence of voting rights for the control shares, as of the date of the last control share acquisition by the acquiror or of any meeting of shareholders at which the voting rights of such shares are considered and not approved. If voting rights for control shares are approved at a shareholders meeting and the acquiror becomes entitled to vote a majority of the shares entitled to vote, all other shareholders may exercise appraisal rights. The fair value of the shares as det ermined for purposes of such appraisal rights may not be less than the highest price per share paid by the acquiror in the control share acquisition. The control share acquisition statute does not apply to shares acquired in a merger, consolidation or share exchange if we are a party to the transaction or to acquisitions approved or exempted by our charter or bylaws.

As permitted by Maryland General Corporation Law, Section 5.10 of our charter contains a provision exempting from the control share acquisition statute any and all acquisitions by any person of our shares.

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

General

We are offering up to $3,500,000,000 in shares of our common stock pursuant to this prospectus through Hines Real Estate Investments, Inc. (formerly known as Hines Real Estate Securities, Inc.), our Dealer Manager, a registered broker-dealer organized in June 2003 and affiliated with Hines. For additional information about our Dealer Manager, please see “Management — The Dealer Manager.” We are offering up to $3,000,000,000 in shares to the public and up to $500,000,000 in shares pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan. All investors must meet the suitability standards discussed in the section of this prospectus entitled “Suitability Standards.” Of the $3,500,000,000 in shares being offered pursuant to this prospectus, we are currently offering:

• shares to the public at a price of $10.08 per share;

• shares to the public at a price of $9.15 per share, if the purchaser is party to an agreement with a licensed broker dealer, investment advisor or bank trust department pursuant to which the purchaser pays a fee based on assets under management such as a “wrap fee”, “commission replacement fee”, or similar fee, in which event we will waive dealer manager fees and the selling commissions and sell shares to you at an aggregate 9.2% discount; and

• shares for issuance pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan at a price of $9.58 per share.

Please see “— Underwriting Terms” and “— Volume Discounts” for a description of the conditions to which the other discounts and fee waivers available to purchasers in this offering are subject. The determination of these prices by our board of directors was primarily based on (i) our estimated per-share net asset value as determined by our management, plus (ii), in the case of our offering price, the commission and dealer manager fee. Our management estimated our per-share net asset value using valuations of our real estate assets and notes payable as of December 31, 2008, which were determined by independent third parties (except for assets acquired within the last year for which we used aggregate cost). Management estimated the values of our other assets and liabilities as of De cember 31, 2008, and then made various adjustments and estimations in order to account for our operations and other factors occurring or expected to occur between December 31, 2008 and the effective date of this pricing change. In addition, our board of directors also considered our historical and anticipated results of operations and financial condition, our current and anticipated distribution payments, yields and offering prices of other real estate companies we deem to be substantially similar to us, our current and anticipated capital and debt structure, and our management’s and Advisor’s recommendations and assessment of our prospects and expected execution of our investment and operating strategies.

142

The valuations of our real estate assets and notes payable, as well as the methodology utilized by our management in estimating our per-share net asset value, were based on a number of assumptions and estimates that may not be accurate or complete. No liquidity discounts or discounts relating to the fact that we are externally managed were applied to our estimated per-share valuation, and no attempt was made to value Hines REIT as an enterprise. Likewise, the valuation was not reduced by potential selling commissions or other costs of sale, which would impact proceeds in the case of a liquidation. The offering price may not be indicative of the price our shareholders would receive if they sold our shares, if our shares were actively traded or if we were liquidated. Moreover, since certain fees and costs associated with this offering we re added to the estimated per-share net asset value of Hines REIT in connection with setting the new offering price of our shares, the proceeds received from a liquidation of our assets would likely be substantially less than the offering price of our shares. Please see “Risk Factors — Investment Risks — The offering price of our common shares may not be indicative of the price at which our shares would trade if they were actively traded.” Our offering price may change from time to time, but not more frequently than quarterly during this offering.

Our board of directors may in its discretion from time to time change the offering price of our common shares and, therefore, the number of shares being offered in this offering. In such event, we expect that our board of directors would consider, among others, the factors described above. Values of real estate assets and notes payable, as well as the fees described above, may fluctuate in the future and may result in an increase or decrease in the price of our common shares. Thus, future adjustments to the offering price of our shares could result in a higher or lower offering price. The members of our board of directors must, in accordance with their fiduciary duties, act in a manner which they believe is in the best interests of our shareholders when making any decision to adjust the offering price of our common shares.

Any adjustments to the offering price will be made through a supplement or an amendment to this prospectus or a post-effective amendment to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part. Our board of directors may change the offering price from time to time in its sole discretion; however unless the current offering is extended, our board of directors presently does not expect to reprice our shares during the remainder of the current offering (which is presently anticipated to terminate on or before July 1, 2010). In no event will our board of directors change the offering price more frequently than quarterly during this offering. Additionally, we cannot assure you that our offering price will increase in the future or that our offering price will not further decrease during this offering, or in connection with any future offering of our shares. Please see “Risk Factors — Investment Risks — Hines REIT’s interest in the Operating Partnership will be diluted by the Participation Interest in the Operating Partnership held by HALP Associates Limited Partnership and your interest in Hines REIT may be diluted if we issue additional shares.”

This offering commenced on July 1, 2008. We reserve the right to terminate this offering at any time or extend the termination to the extent we can under applicable law.

Underwriting Terms

We have not retained an underwriter in connection with this offering. Our common shares are being offered on a “best efforts” basis, which means that no underwriter, broker-dealer or other person will be obligated to purchase any shares. Please see “Risk Factors — Investment Risks — This offering is being conducted on a “best efforts” basis, and the risk that we will not be able to accomplish our business objectives will increase if only a small number of our shares are purchased in this offering.” We will pay the Dealer Manager selling commissions of up to 7.0% of the gross offering proceeds of shares sold to the public, all of which will be reallowed to participating broker dealers. We will not pay selling commissions on shares issued and sold pursuant to our dividend reinvest ment plan. Further, as described below, selling commissions may be reduced or waived in connection with volume or other discounts or other fee arrangements.

The Dealer Manager has entered into selected dealer agreements with certain other broker-dealers who are members of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) to authorize them to sell our shares. Upon the sale of shares by such participating broker-dealers, the Dealer Manager will reallow its commissions to such participating broker-dealers.

143

The Dealer Manager will also receive a dealer manager fee of up to 2.2% of gross offering proceeds we raise from the sale of shares to the public as compensation for managing and coordinating the offering, working with participating broker-dealers and providing sales and marketing assistance. We will not pay dealer manager fees on shares issued and sold pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan. Further, as described below, dealer manager fees may be reduced or waived in connection with volume or other discounts or other fee arrangements. The Dealer Manager, in its sole discretion, may pay to participating broker-dealers a marketing fee in an amount up to 2.2% of gross offering proceeds from the sale of shares by such participating broker-dealers, in part to defray fees and costs associated with conferences sponsored by participating broker-dealers and marketing and other distribution-related costs and expenses of participating broker-dealers. With respect to sales for which the dealer manager fees are earned by the Dealer Manager, the marketing fees shall be reallowed to participating broker-dealers from the dealer manager fee. With respect to sales for which the dealer manager fees are waived and there is no dealer manager fee from which to reallow the payment of the marketing fees, the Advisor will reimburse the Dealer Manager for the payment of the marketing fees. The marketing fees may be paid to any particular participating broker-dealer based upon prior or projected volume of sales, the amount of marketing assistance and level of marketing support provided by such participating broker-dealer in the past and the anticipated level of marketing support to be provided in this offering.

Other than these fees, we will not pay any other fees to any professional or other person in connection with the distribution of the shares in this offering.

We have agreed to indemnify participating broker-dealers, the Dealer Manager and our Advisor against material misstatements and omissions contained in this prospectus, as well as other potential liabilities arising in connection with this offering, including liabilities arising under the Securities Act, subject to certain conditions. The Dealer Manager will also indemnify participating broker-dealers against such liabilities, and under certain circumstances, our sponsor and/or our Advisor may agree to indemnify participating broker-dealers against such liabilities.

We entered into a selected dealer agreement with the Dealer Manager, the Advisor and Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc. (“Ameriprise”), pursuant to which Ameriprise was appointed as a soliciting dealer in this offering. Subject to certain limitations set forth in the agreement, we, the Dealer Manager and the Advisor, jointly and severally, agreed to indemnify Ameriprise against losses, liability, claims, damages and expenses caused by certain untrue or alleged untrue statements, or omissions or alleged omissions of material fact made in connection with the offering, certain filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission or certain other public statements, or the breach by us, the Dealer Manager or the Advisor or any employee or agent acting on their behalf, of any of the representations, warranties, covenants, terms a nd conditions of the agreement. In addition, Hines separately agreed to provide a limited indemnification to Ameriprise for these losses on a joint and several basis with the other entities, and we separately agreed to indemnify and reimburse Hines for any amounts Hines is required to pay pursuant to this indemnification. Please see “Conflicts of Interest.”

The following table shows the estimated maximum compensation payable to the Dealer Manager and participating broker-dealers in connection with this offering.

Type of Compensation and Expenses	Maximum Amount		Percentage of Maximum (Excluding DRP Shares)
Selling Commissions(1)	$	210,000,000		7.0	%
Dealer Manager Fees(2)(4)	$	66,000,000		2.2	%
Total Expenses to Be Paid by the Company	$	276,000,000		9.2	%
Expenses to Be Paid by the Advisor and Not by the Company(3)(4)	$	5,020,924		0.2	%
Total Expenses to Be Paid by the Company and the Advisor to the Dealer Manager and Participating Broker-Dealers	$	281,020,924		9.4	%

____________

144

(1)	For purposes of this table, we have assumed no volume discounts or waived commissions as discussed elsewhere in this “Plan of Distribution.” We will not pay commissions for sales of shares pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan.
(2)	For purposes of this table, we have assumed no waived dealer manager fees as discussed elsewhere in this “Plan of Distribution.” We will not pay a dealer manager fee for sales of shares pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan.
(3)	Additional amounts may be paid by the Advisor to the Dealer Manager, its employees and to participating broker-dealers for expenses related to this offering which may include, but are not limited to: (i) salaries, discretionary bonuses, benefits and other expenses of employees of our Dealer Manager while participating in the offering and marketing of our shares and in connection with their wholesaling activities; (ii) costs and expenses related to participating in broker-dealer sponsored events or hosting meetings with participating broker-dealers; (iii) costs and expenses of conducting educational conferences and seminars; (iv) travel, lodging, entertainment and other expenses related to the offering and marketing of our shares; (v) advertising and marketing expenses, including the cost of promotional items; ( vi) costs and expenses of conducting internal sales training and seminars and (vii) legal expenses of the Dealer Manager. We estimate that such expenses will approximate $5,020,924 (of which approximately $2.6 million is attributable to expenses related to the distribution of shares pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan) and would be considered underwriting compensation under applicable NASD Conduct Rules applicable to participating broker-dealers who are members of FINRA.
(4)	Participating broker-dealers may receive from the Dealer Manager additional reimbursements to defray technology costs and other marketing and distribution related costs and expenses. Participating broker-dealers shall be required to provide a detailed and itemized invoice as a condition to any such reimbursement. The estimated maximum amount of such reimbursements is included in the amount listed as dealer manager fees in this table. As specified in Notes 1 and 2 above, for purposes of this table, we have assumed no waived commissions or dealer manager fees. In connection with sales of our shares pursuant to which commissions and dealer manager fees are waived as discussed elsewhere in this “Plan of Distribution,” the Advisor will reimburse the Dealer Manager for the payment of marketing fees (as described above) and f or any reimbursements to participating broker-dealers described in this Note 4. In such an event, the amount listed above as dealer manager fees would decrease with a corresponding increase in the amount listed as “Expenses to Be Paid by the Advisor and Not by the Company.” There would be no impact on the total estimated maximum underwriting compensation presented in this table.

In accordance with applicable NASD Conduct Rules, in no event will total underwriting compensation payable to FINRA members (including, but not limited to, selling commissions, the dealer manager fee, expense reimbursements to our wholesalers and participating broker-dealers and their registered representatives, all compensation payable to wholesalers of the Dealer Manager and transaction-based compensation payable to other registered representatives of the Dealer Manager who are directly responsible for sales activities, other than a registered representative whose functions are clerical or administerial and whose sales activities, if any, are de minimus) exceed 10% of maximum gross offering proceeds, except for any additional amounts equal to up to 0.5% of gross offering proceeds which may be paid by the Advisor in connection wi th bona fide due diligence activities.

In addition to the underwriting compensation described above, the Advisor will pay for all organization and offering expenses, other than selling commissions and dealer manager fees, whether incurred by us directly or through the Advisor, the Dealer Manager and/or their affiliates, which expenses are expected to consist of, among other expenses, actual legal, accounting, printing, filing fees, transfer agent costs, our costs and expenses related to educational conferences and seminars conducted by Hines, our costs and expenses related to attending broker-dealer sponsored conferences and other offering-related expenses. We will have no liability for such expenses.

145

In the event that an investor:

• has a contract for investment advisory and related brokerage services which includes a fee based on the amount of assets under management or a “wrap” fee feature;

• has a contract for a “commission replacement” account, which is an account in which securities are held for a fee only;

• has engaged the services of a registered investment adviser with whom the investor has agreed to pay compensation for investment advisory services or other financial or investment advice (except where an investor has a contract for financial planning services with a registered investment advisor that is also a registered broker dealer, such contract will not qualify the investor for the discount reflecting nonpayment of the selling commissions and the dealer manager fee as described below);

• is investing in a bank trust account with respect to which the investor has delegated the decision-making authority for investments made in the account to a bank trust department for a fee; or

• has any other type of account which requires the investor to pay fees based on assets under management (and the investor’s financial or investment advisor agrees to the waiver of commissions payable in connection with this offering), we will sell shares to or for the account of such investor at a 9.2% discount, or $9.15 per share, reflecting the fact that selling commissions and the dealer manager fee will not be paid in connection with such purchases. The net proceeds we receive from the sale of shares will not be affected by such sales of shares made net of selling commissions and the dealer manager fee. Such investors will not be permitted to participate in our dividend reinvestment plan because the price per share under our dividend reinvestment plan is $9.58 and such investors can purchase shares outside of the dividend reinvestment plan for $9.15 per share. As set forth above, the Dealer Manager may pay marketing fees to participating broker-dealers in connection with sales of shares to such investors, in part to defray fees and costs associated with conferences sponsored by such participating broker-dealers and marketing and other distribution-related costs and expenses. The Advisor will reimburse the Dealer Manager for any such payments to participating broker-dealers.

We may sell shares to retirement plans of participating broker-dealers, to participating broker-dealers themselves (and their employees), to IRAs and qualified plans of their registered representatives or to any one of their registered representatives in their individual capacities (and to each of their spouses, parents and minor children) at a 9.2% discount, or $9.15 per share, reflecting that no selling commissions or dealer manager fees will be paid in connection with such transactions. The net proceeds we receive will not be affected by such sales of shares at a discount.

Our directors and officers, both current and retired, as well as affiliates of Hines and their directors, officers and employees, both current and retired, (and their spouses, parents and minor children) and entities owned substantially by such individuals, may purchase shares in this offering at a 9.2% discount, or $9.15 per share, reflecting the fact that no selling commissions or dealer manager fees will be paid in connection with any such sales. The net offering proceeds we receive will not be affected by such sales of shares at a discount. Hines and its affiliates will be expected to hold their shares purchased as shareholders for investment and not with a view towards distribution.

In addition, Hines, the Dealer Manager or one of their affiliates may form one or more foreign-based entities for the purpose of raising capital from foreign investors to invest in our shares. Sales of our shares to any such foreign entity may be at a 9.2% discount, or $9.15 per share, reflecting the fact that no selling commissions or dealer manager fees will be paid in connection with any such transactions. The net offering proceeds we receive will not be affected by such sales of shares at a discount.

Shares sold at the discounts described above are identical in all respects to shares sold without such discounts, with equal dividend, distribution, liquidation and other rights.

146

Volume Discounts

We are offering, and participating broker-dealers and their registered representatives will be responsible for implementing, volume discounts to qualifying purchasers (as defined below) who purchase $250,000 or more in shares from the same participating broker-dealer, whether in a single purchase or as the result of multiple purchases. Any reduction in the amount of the selling commissions as a result of volume discounts received may be credited to the qualifying purchasers in the form of the issuance of additional shares.

The volume discounts operate as follows:

Amount of Shares Purchased	Commission Percentage			Price per Share to the Investor		Amount of Commission Paid per Share		Net Offering Proceeds per Share(1)
Up to $249,999		7.0	%	$	10.08	$	0.71	$	9.37
$250,000 to $499,999		6.0	%	$	9.98	$	0.61	$	9.37
$500,000 to $749,999		5.0	%	$	9.88	$	0.51	$	9.37
$750,000 to $999,999		4.0	%	$	9.78	$	0.41	$	9.37
$1,000,000 to $1,249,999		3.0	%	$	9.68	$	0.31	$	9.37
$1,250,000 to $1,499,999		2.0	%	$	9.58	$	0.21	$	9.37
$1,500,000 and over		1.5	%	$	9.53	$	0.16	$	9.37

____________

(1) Before payment of the Dealer Manager fee.

For example, if you purchase $800,000 in shares, the selling commissions on such shares will be reduced to 4.0%, in which event you will receive 81,799 shares instead of 79,365 shares, the number of shares you would have received if you had paid $10.08 per share. The net offering proceeds we receive from the sale of shares are not affected by volume discounts.

If you qualify for a particular volume discount as the result of multiple purchases of our shares, you will receive the benefit of the applicable volume discount for the individual purchase which qualified you for the volume discount, but you will not be entitled to the benefit for prior purchases. Additionally, once you qualify for a volume discount, you will receive the benefit for subsequent purchases. For this purpose, if you purchased shares issued and sold in our prior offerings, you will receive the benefit of such share purchases in connection with qualifying for volume discounts in this offering.

As set forth below, a “qualifying purchaser” may combine purchases by other persons for the purpose of qualifying for a volume discount, and for determining commissions payable to participating broker-dealers. You must request that your share purchases be combined for this purpose by designating such on your subscription agreement. For the purposes of such volume discounts, the term “qualifying purchaser” includes:

• an individual, his or her spouse and their children under the age of 21 who purchase the common shares for his, her or their own accounts; a corporation, partnership, association, joint-stock company, trust fund or any organized group of persons, whether incorporated or not;

• an employees’ trust, pension, profit-sharing or other employee benefit plan qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code;

• all commingled trust funds maintained by a given bank; and

• Subscriptions obtained by certain participating broker-dealers, as discussed below. Any request to combine purchases of our shares will be subject to our verification that such purchases were made by a “qualifying purchaser.”

In addition, the Dealer Manager may, in its sole discretion, allow participating broker-dealers to combine subscriptions of multiple purchasers as part of a combined order for purposes of determining the commissions payable to the Dealer Manager and the participating broker-dealer. In order for a participating broker-dealer to combine subscriptions for the purposes of qualifying for discounts or fee waivers, the Dealer Manager and such participating broker-dealer must agree on acceptable procedures relating to the combination of subscriptions for this purpose. In all events, in order to qualify, any such combined order of subscriptions must be from the same participating broker-dealer.

147

In order to encourage purchases of our shares in excess of $10 million, the Dealer Manager may, in its sole discretion, (i) agree with a participating broker-dealer to reduce sales commissions with respect to shares purchased by qualifying purchasers to as low as $0.16 per share; and (ii) agree with qualifying purchasers to waive the dealer manager fee with respect to such shares such that shares purchased in any such transaction may be at a price of $9.31 per share, reflecting a reduction in selling commissions from 7.0% to 1.5% and an additional reduction of 2.2% due to the Dealer Manager’s waiver of its fee. The net offering proceeds we receive will not be affected by any reduction of selling commissions or any such waiver of the dealer manager fee.

Accordingly, your ability to receive a discount or fee waiver based on combining orders or otherwise may depend on the financial advisor or broker-dealer through which you purchase your shares, so you should check before purchasing shares.

Requests to combine subscriptions as a part of a combined order for the purpose of qualifying for discounts or fee waivers must be made in writing by the participating broker-dealer, and any resulting reduction in selling commissions or the dealer manager fee will be pro rated among the separate subscribers. As with discounts provided to other purchasers, the net proceeds we receive from the sale of shares will not be affected by discounts provided as a result of a combined order.

Regardless of any reduction in any commissions for any reason, any other fees based upon gross proceeds of the offering will be calculated as though the purchaser paid $10.08 per share. An investor qualifying for a discount will receive a higher percentage return on his or her investment than investors who do not qualify for such discount. With respect to shares purchased pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan, you cannot receive a discount greater than 5% of the then-current price of our shares, regardless of whether you have received a greater discount on shares purchased in this or prior offerings due to the volume of your purchases or otherwise. Accordingly, if you qualify for the discounts and fee waivers described above, you may be able to receive a lower price on subsequent purchases in this offering than you would receive i f you participate in our dividend reinvestment plan and have your dividends reinvested at the price offered thereunder.

Discounts and fee waivers will be available through certain financial advisers and broker-dealers under the circumstances described above, and you should ask your financial advisor and/or broker-dealer about the ability to receive such discounts or fee waivers.

The Subscription Process

We and participating broker-dealers selling shares on our behalf are required to make every reasonable effort to determine whether a purchase of our shares is suitable for you. The participating broker-dealers shall transmit promptly to us the completed subscription documentation and any supporting documentation we may reasonably require.

The Dealer Manager and participating broker-dealers are required to deliver to you a copy of this prospectus and any amendments or supplements. We plan to make this prospectus and the appendices available electronically to the Dealer Manager and the participating broker-dealers, as well as to provide them paper copies, on our website at www.HinesREIT.com. Any prospectus, amendments and supplements, as well as any quarterly reports, annual reports, proxy statements or other reports required to be made available to you will be posted on our website at www.HinesREIT.com. We may not accept a subscription for shares until at least five business days after the date you receive the final prospectus.

Sales of our shares are completed upon the receipt and acceptance by us of subscriptions. We have the unconditional right to accept or reject your subscription within 20 days after our receipt of a fully completed copy of the subscription agreement and payment for the number of shares for which you subscribed. If we accept your subscription, our transfer agent will mail you a confirmation. No sale of our shares may be completed until at least five business days after the date you receive the final prospectus. If for any reason we reject your subscription, we will return your funds and your subscription agreement, without interest or deduction, within 20 days after our receipt of the same.

148

To purchase shares pursuant to this offering, you must deliver a completed subscription agreement, in substantially the form that accompanies this prospectus, prior to the termination of this offering. You should pay for your shares by check payable to “Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.” or “Hines REIT,” or as otherwise instructed by your participating broker-dealer. Subscriptions will be effective only upon our acceptance. We may, for any reason, accept or reject any subscription agreement, in whole or in part. You may not terminate or withdraw a subscription or purchase obligation after you have delivered a subscription agreement evidencing such obligation to us.

Admission of Shareholders

We intend to admit shareholders daily as subscriptions for shares are accepted by us in good order. Upon your being admitted as a shareholder, we will use your subscription proceeds to make real estate investments and pay fees and expenses as described in this prospectus. Please see “Estimated Use of Proceeds.”

Subscription Agreement

The general form of subscription agreement that investors will use to subscribe for the purchase of shares in this offering is included as Appendix A to this prospectus. The subscription agreement requires all investors subscribing for shares to make the following certifications or representations:

• your tax identification number set forth in the subscription agreement is accurate and you are not subject to backup withholding;

• you are a U.S. person;

• a copy of this prospectus was delivered or made available to you;

• you meet the minimum income, net worth and any other applicable suitability standards established for you, as described in the “Suitability Standards” section of this prospectus;

• you are purchasing the shares for your own account; and

• you acknowledge that there is no public market for the shares and, thus, your investment in shares is not liquid.

The above certifications and representations are included in the subscription agreement in order to help satisfy the responsibility of participating broker-dealers and the Dealer Manager to make every reasonable effort to determine that the purchase of our shares is a suitable and appropriate investment for you and that appropriate income tax reporting information is obtained. We will not sell any shares to you unless you are able to make the above certifications and representations by executing the subscription agreement. By executing the subscription agreement, you will not, however, be waiving any rights you may have under the federal securities laws.

In addition, investors who are California residents will be required to make certain additional certifications or representations that the sale, transfer or assignment of their shares will be made only with the prior written consent of the Commissioner of the Department of Corporations of the State of California, or as otherwise permitted by the Commissioner’s rules.

Determinations of Suitability

Our sponsor and each participating broker-dealer who sells shares on our behalf has the responsibility to make every reasonable effort to determine that the purchase of shares in this offering is a suitable and appropriate investment based on information provided by the prospective investor regarding, among other things, each prospective investor’s financial situation and investment objectives. In making this determination, participating broker-dealers who sell shares on our behalf may rely on, among other things, relevant information provided by the prospective investors. Each prospective investor should be aware that participating broker-dealers are responsible for determining suitability and will be relying on the information provided by prospective investors in making this determination. In making this determination, particip ating broker-dealers have a responsibility to ascertain that each prospective investor:

149

• meets the minimum income and net worth standards set forth under the “Suitability Standards” section of this prospectus;

• can reasonably benefit from an investment in our shares based on the prospective investor’s investment objectives and overall portfolio structure;

• is able to bear the economic risk of the investment based on the prospective investor’s net worth and overall financial situation; and

• has apparent understanding of:

•      the fundamental risks of an investment in the shares;

•      the risk that the prospective investor may lose his or her entire investment;

•      the lack of liquidity of the shares;

•      the restrictions on transferability of the shares; and

•      the tax consequences of an investment in the shares.

Participating broker-dealers are required to make the determinations set forth above based upon information relating to each prospective investor concerning his age, investment objectives, investment experience, income, net worth, financial situation and other investments of the prospective investor, as well as other pertinent factors. Each participating broker-dealer is required to maintain records of the information used to determine that an investment in shares is suitable and appropriate for an investor. These records are required to be maintained for a period of at least six years.

Minimum Investment

In order to purchase shares in this offering, you initially must invest at least $2,500. Please see “Suitability Standards.” Except in Maine, Minnesota, Nebraska and Washington (where any subsequent subscriptions by investors must be made in increments of at least $1,000), investors who have satisfied the initial minimum purchase requirement may make additional purchases in increments of at least five shares, except for purchases made pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan which may be in increments of less than five shares.

Termination Date

This offering will terminate at the time all shares being offered pursuant to this prospectus have been sold or the offering is terminated prior thereto and the unsold shares are withdrawn from registration, but in no event later than July 1, 2010 (two years after the initial effective date of this prospectus), unless we announce an extension of the offering in a supplement or amendment to this prospectus.

THE OPERATING PARTNERSHIP

We conduct substantially all of our operations through the Operating Partnership. The following is a summary of the material provisions of the Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership. We refer to the Operating Partnership’s Agreement of Limited Partnership as the “Partnership Agreement.”

General

The Operating Partnership was formed in August, 2003 to hold our assets. It will allow the Company to operate as what is generally referred to as an “Umbrella Partnership Real Estate Investment Trust,” or an “UPREIT,” which structure is utilized generally to provide for the acquisition of real property from owners who desire to defer taxable gain that would otherwise be recognized by them upon the disposition of their property. These owners may also desire to achieve diversity in their investment and other benefits afforded to owners of stock in a REIT. For purposes of satisfying the asset and income tests for qualification as a REIT for tax purposes, the REIT’s proportionate share of the assets and income of an UPREIT, such as the Operating Partnership, will be deemed to be assets and income of the REIT.

150

A property owner may contribute property to an UPREIT in exchange for limited partnership units on a tax-free basis. In addition, the Operating Partnership is structured to make distributions with respect to OP Units that will be equivalent to the dividends made to holders of our common shares. Finally, a limited partner in the Operating Partnership may later exchange his or her limited partner interests in the Operating Partnership for cash or shares of our common stock, at our election, in a taxable transaction.

The Partnership Agreement contains provisions which would allow, under certain circumstances, other entities, including other programs, to merge into or cause the exchange or conversion of their interests for limited partner interests in the Operating Partnership. In the event of such a merger, exchange or conversion, the Operating Partnership may issue additional OP Units which would be entitled to the same exchange rights as other holders of OP Units of the Operating Partnership. As a result, any such merger, exchange or conversion could ultimately result in the issuance of a substantial number of our common shares, thereby diluting the percentage ownership interest of other shareholders. We may also create separate classes or series of OP Units having privileges, variations and designations as we may determine in our sole and absolute discretion.

We hold substantially all of our assets through the Operating Partnership. We are the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership and, as of December 31, 2008, we owned a 97.3% ownership interest in the Operating Partnership and Hines 2005 VS I LP, an affiliate of Hines, owned a 0.5% ownership interest in the Operating Partnership. Finally, HALP Associates Limited Partnership owned the Participation Interest in the Operating Partnership, which represented a 2.2% ownership interest as of December 31, 2008. Please see “— The Participation Interest” below. As the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, we have the exclusive power to manage and conduct the business of the Operating Partnership.

Purposes and Powers

The Operating Partnership is organized as a Delaware limited partnership. The purposes of the Operating Partnership are to engage in any lawful business activities in which a partnership formed under Delaware law may engage or participate, with its primary objectives and purposes being, either as a partner in a partnership or joint venture or otherwise, to purchase, own, maintain, mortgage, encumber, equip, manage, lease, finance, operate, dispose of or otherwise deal with real property, interests in real property or mortgages secured by real property on our behalf. The Operating Partnership may also be a partner (general or limited) in partnerships (general or limited), a venturer in joint ventures, a shareholder in corporations, a member in limited liability companies or an investor in any other type of business entity created to acc omplish all or any of the foregoing. The Operating Partnership’s purposes may be accomplished by taking any action which is not prohibited under the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act.

Operations

The Partnership Agreement requires that the Operating Partnership be operated in a manner that will enable us to satisfy the requirements for being classified as a REIT for tax purposes, avoid any federal income or excise tax liability and ensure that the Operating Partnership will not be classified as a “publicly traded partnership” for purposes of Section 7704 of the Code, which classification could result in the Operating Partnership being taxed as a corporation, rather than as a partnership. Please see “Material Tax Considerations — Tax Aspects of the Operating Partnership.” The Partnership Agreement provides that the Operating Partnership will distribute cash flow from operations to its partners in accordance with their relative percentage interests, on at least a quarterly basis, in amounts determined by us. Please see “— Distributions” below. Distributions will be made such that a holder of one OP Unit in the Operating Partnership will receive an amount of annual cash flow distributions from the Operating Partnership equal to the amount of annual dividends paid to the holder of one of our common shares.

151

The Partnership Agreement provides that, subject to compliance with the provisions of Sections 704(b) and 704(c) of the Code and corresponding Treasury Regulations:

• income from operations is allocated first to the holder of the Participation Interest until it has been allocated income in an amount equal to distributions made to such holder, and then to the remaining partners of the Operating Partnership in proportion to the number of units held by each of them;

• gain from the sale or other disposition of property is generally allocated in such a manner as to cause the capital account balances of the holder of the Participation Interest and the holders of the OP Units to be in proportion to their respective percentage interests; and

• all losses are generally allocated in such a manner as to cause the capital account balances of the holder of the Participation Interest and the holders of the OP Units to be in proportion to their respective percentage interests.

Upon the liquidation of the Operating Partnership, after payment of debts and obligations, any remaining assets of the Operating Partnership will be distributed to partners with positive capital accounts in accordance with their respective positive capital account balances. If the holder of the Participation Interest were to have a negative balance in its capital account following a liquidation, it would be obligated to contribute cash to the Operating Partnership equal to such negative balance for distribution to other partners, if any, having positive balances in such capital accounts.

In addition to the administrative and operating costs and expenses incurred by the Operating Partnership in acquiring and operating real properties, the Operating Partnership will pay all of our administrative costs and expenses. Such expenses will include:

• all expenses relating to the continuity of our existence;

• all expenses associated with the preparation and filing of any periodic reports by us under federal, state or local laws or regulations;

• all expenses associated with compliance by us with applicable laws, rules and regulations;

• all costs and expenses relating to any issuance or redemption of OP Units or our common shares; and

• all our other operating or administrative costs incurred in the ordinary course of our business on behalf of the Operating Partnership.

Amendments

The consent of limited partners holding 67% of the aggregate percentage interest held by all limited partners is required to approve certain amendments to the Partnership Agreement, including amendments that modify:

• the allocation of profits, losses, or distributions among partners;

• any provision relating to the issuance and conversion of OP Units; and

• any provision relating to the transfer of OP Units.

Additionally, the written consent of the general partner and any partner adversely affected is required to amend the Partnership Agreement if the amendment would enlarge the obligation of such partner to make capital contributions to the Operating Partnership. The written consent of all the partners is required to amend these amendment limitations.

152

Transferability of Our General Partner Interest

We may not transfer our interest in the Operating Partnership without the consent of partners holding over 50% of the aggregate percentage interest held by all partners in the Operating Partnership unless:

• the transfer of such interest is to an entity which is, directly or indirectly, controlled by (i) Hines, and/or (ii) Jeffrey C. Hines and/or Gerald D. Hines, or in the event of the death or disability of Jeffrey C. Hines and/or Gerald D. Hines, the heirs, legal representatives or estates of either or both of them or to an entity that is, directly or indirectly, wholly-owned by us and/or Jeffrey C. Hines and/or Gerald D. Hines, or in the event of the death or disability of Jeffrey C. Hines and/or Gerald D. Hines, the heirs, legal representatives or estates of either or both of them; or

• the transfer of such interest is pursuant to or in connection with a change in the outstanding common shares of the Company by reason of any share dividend, split, recapitalization, merger, consolidation, combination, exchange of shares or other similar corporate change and either (i) the shares dividend, split, recapitalization, merger, consolidation, combination, exchange of shares or other similar corporate change has been approved by the consent of a majority-in-interest of the limited partners of the Operating Partnership, or (ii) an appropriate adjustment to the number of OP Units held by each Partner has been made in accordance with the Partnership Agreement.

Voting Rights

When the consent of partners is required to approve certain actions, such as amendments to the Partnership Agreement or a transfer of our interests in the Operating Partnership as referenced above, each partner’s consent rights (including the holder of the Participation Interest) are based on such partner’s percentage interest of the Operating Partnership. Please see “— The Participation Interest” below for a summary of the calculations of the percentage interest attributable to the Participation Interest, which increases over time, and the percentage interests attributable to partners holding OP Units.

The Participation Interest

HALP Associates Limited Partnership owns a profits interest in the Operating Partnership denominated as the Participation Interest, which increases as described below and entitles it to receive distributions of the Operating Partnership based upon its percentage interest of the Operating Partnership at the time of distribution. Because the Participation Interest is a profits interest, any value of such interest would be ultimately realized only if the Operating Partnership has adequate gain or profit to allocate to the holder of the Participation Interest. Through their ownership in an affiliate of Hines or other compensation arrangements, Hines employees (including the officers and managers of our Advisor) will effectively hold up to 50% of the Participation Interest for purposes of aligning their interests with those of our sharehold ers. The Participation Interest was issued in consideration for an obligation by Hines and its affiliates to perform future services in connection with our real estate operations. We believe the Participation Interest had a nominal value at issuance. The percentage interest attributable to the Participation Interest, initially 0.0% at the first month of operations of the Operating Partnership and 2.2% as of December 31, 2008, increases on a monthly basis as described below. We anticipate that the percentage interest attributable to the Participation Interest will increase incrementally over time and, consequently, the percentage interest of holders of OP Units, including Hines REIT, will decrease proportionally. See “Risk Factors — Investment Risks — Hines REIT’s interest in the Operating Partnership will be diluted by the Participation Interest in the Operating Partnership held by HALP Associates Limited Partnership, and your investment in Hines REIT may be dilute d if we issue additional shares” and “— Hypothetical Impact of the Participation Interest” below.

The percentage interest of the holder of the Participation Interest as of the end of a particular calendar month will equal the sum of:

(a) the percentage interest attributable to the Participation Interest as of the end of the immediately preceding month, adjusted for any issuances or redemptions of OP Units during the month, plus

153

(b) 0.0625% of the net equity received by the Operating Partnership and invested in real estate investments as of the end of the current month, divided by the “Equity Value” (as defined below) of the Operating Partnership as of the end of the current month, plus

(c) 0.50% of the “Gross Real Estate Investments” (as defined below) made by the Operating Partnership during the current month, divided by the Equity Value of the Operating Partnership as of the end of such month.

The monthly adjustment to the percentage interest attributable to the Participation Interest is intended to approximate the economic equivalent of the cash acquisition and asset management fees earned by the Advisor under the Advisory Agreement for the applicable month, and the immediate and automatic reinvestment of such amount into the Operating Partnership in exchange for equity. Adjustments in the percentage interest attributable to the Participation Interest as described above will cease at such time as an affiliate of Hines no longer serves as our advisor.

“Equity Value” as of a particular date means, in cases where we have an offering of common shares then in effect, the product of (i) the per-share offering price for the common shares that are the subject of such offering, net of selling commissions and dealer manager fees, multiplied by (ii) a number equal to the number of OP Units outstanding as of the end of such month, divided by the difference between 100% and the percentage interest attributable to the Participation Interest as of the end of such month. In cases where we do not have an offering of common shares then in effect, “Equity Value” as of a particular date means the net fair market value of the Operating Partnership’s equity as of such date, as approved by our board of d irectors, which shall generally equal the net proceeds that would be available for distribution by the Operating Partnership if all properties owned directly or indirectly by the Operating Partnership were sold at their fair market value in an all cash sale as of such date, and all expected transaction costs (including all closing costs customarily borne by a seller in the market where each property is located and estimated legal fees and expenses) were paid, and all liabilities were repaid, out of such proceeds.

The term “Gross Real Estate Investments” of the Operating Partnership means the gross amount invested by the Operating Partnership in any real estate investments (either directly or indirectly, including real estate investments contributed to the Operating Partnership for OP Units), including debt attributable to such investments; provided that in the case of amounts invested in entities not wholly-owned by the Operating Partnership, the term shall mean our allocable share of the Gross Real Estate Investments of such entities.

The foregoing calculation of the percentage interest of the Participation Interest as of the end of a particular month will be effective as of the first day of the following month. While the Participation Interest increases on a monthly basis, the amount of the increase is diluted by the number of OP Units issued (including OP Units issued to Hines REIT as the general partner as a result of offering proceeds raised by us), or increased as a result of OP Units redeemed, during such calendar month, so that the percentage interest attributable to the Participation Interest immediately after such issuance or redemption equals (i) the percentage interest attributable to the Participation Interest immediately prior to such issuance or redemption, multiplied by (ii) a fraction whose numerator is the number of OP  Units outstanding immediately prior to such issuance or redemption and whose denominator is the number of OP Units outstanding immediately after such issuance or redemption. The Participation Interest may be repurchased for common shares or cash as described below. Repurchases of the Participation Interest will result in a reduction in the percentage interest attributable to the Participation Interest to the extent of such repurchase and will have no impact on the calculation of subsequent increases in the Participation Interest.

The percentage interest of each partner holding OP Units for any particular calendar month will equal:

• 100% minus the percentage interest attributable to the Participation Interest, multiplied by

• the sum of the number of OP Units held by such partner, assuming the conversion of any Preference Units held by such partner (if any) into OP Units, divided by

• the sum of all OP Units issued and outstanding at such time, assuming the conversion of all Preference Units issued and outstanding at such time (if any) into OP Units.

154

Hypothetical Impact of the Participation Interest

The following table shows an example of the increase of the Participation Interest, and the proportionate decrease of Hines REIT’s interest in the Operating Partnership. This table shows the actual ownership percentages in the Operating Partnership as of December 31, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008, and the estimated percentages for 2009 through 2013 assuming: (i) we raise $375 million for each quarter remaining in this offering, (ii) we raise no additional capital and otherwise issue no additional shares remaining during the remaining five years represented, (iii) we immediately invest all proceeds received in real estate investments without taking into account selling commissions, dealer manager fees or organizational and offering expenses, (iv) no other interests in the Operating Partnership are i ssued, and (v) our investments in real estate investments are 50% leveraged at the time of acquisition.

End of Year	Hines REIT(1)			Hines’ Cash Investment(2)			Participation Interest(3)			Total
December 31, 2004		64.29	%		34.33	%		1.38	%		100.00	%
December 31, 2005		94.24	%		4.53	%		1.23	%		100.00	%
December 31, 2006		97.38	%		1.34	%		1.28	%		100.00	%
December 31, 2007		97.60	%		0.68	%		1.72	%		100.00	%
December 31, 2008		97.31	%		0.53	%		2.16	%		100.00	%
Estimated December 31, 2009		97.06	%		0.39	%		2.55	%		100.00	%
Estimated December 31, 2010		96.93	%		0.28	%		2.79	%		100.00	%
Estimated December 31, 2011		96.19	%		0.27	%		3.54	%		100.00	%
Estimated December 31, 2012		95.44	%		0.27	%		4.29	%		100.00	%
Estimated December 31, 2013		94.69	%		0.27	%		5.04	%		100.00	%

____________

(1)	Represents Hines REIT’s interest in the Operating Partnership received as a result of offering proceeds contributed to the Operating Partnership.
(2)	Represents the $10,200,000 investment HREH made in the Operating Partnership and subsequently transferred to Hines 2005 VS I LP.
(3)	The increase in the Participation Interest will be less if Hines REIT conducts future offerings similar to this offering, as the increase in the Participation Interest will be diluted by future issuances of shares.

Repurchase of OP Units and the Participation Interest

Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, limited partners will receive rights that will enable them to request the repurchase of their OP Units for cash or, at our option, common shares in Hines REIT. The holder of the Participation Interest likewise has the right to request the repurchase of the Participation Interest for cash or, at our option, common shares in Hines REIT. These repurchase rights will be exercisable one year after the OP Units or Participation Interest are issued to such limited partner. In either event, the cash amount to be paid will be equal to the cash value of the number of our shares that would be issuable if the OP Units or, in the case of the Participation Interest, the Participation Interest Unit Equivalents were exchanged for our shares on a one-for-one basis. Alternatively, we may elect to pur chase the OP Units or Participation Interest by issuing one common share for each OP Unit or Participation Interest Unit Equivalent exchanged. The number of “Participation Interest Unit Equivalents” equals a number of OP Units that would represent the percentage interest in the Operating Partnership evidenced by the Participation Interest or, if less, a number of OP Units that represents the Participation Interest’s proportionate share of the Capital Account balances of all partners in the Partnership (determined as if the assets of the Partnership were liquidated for a net amount equal to Net Asset Value). A limited partner cannot exercise these repurchase rights if such repurchase would:

• cause us to no longer qualify (or it would be likely that we no longer would qualify) as a REIT under the Code;

• result in any person owning common shares in excess of our ownership limits;

155

• constitute or be likely to constitute a violation of any applicable federal or state securities law;

• violate any provision of our charter or bylaws;

• cause us to be “closely held” within the meaning of Section 856(h) of the Code;

• cause us to own 10% or more of the ownership interests in a tenant within the meaning of Section 856(d)(2)(B) of the Code;

• cause the acquisition of shares by a limited partner whose interests are repurchased to be “integrated” with any other distribution of our shares for purposes of complying with the Securities Act; or

• cause the Operating Partnership to be classified as a “publicly traded partnership” as that term is defined in Section 7704 of the Code or cause a technical termination of the Operating Partnership under Section 708 of the Code. In particular, as long as the Operating Partnership is potentially subject to classification as a publicly traded partnership, a limited partner may exercise repurchase rights only if:

• the redemption would constitute a “private transfer” (as that term is defined in the Partnership Agreement); or

• the redemption, when aggregated with other transfers of OP Units within the same taxable year (but not including private transfers), would constitute 10% or less of the percentage interests in the Operating Partnership.

We do not expect to issue any of the common shares offered hereby to limited partners of the Operating Partnership in exchange for their OP Units or the Participation Interest. Rather, in the event a limited partner of the Operating Partnership exercises its repurchase rights, and we elect to purchase the OP Units or Participation Interest with our common shares, we expect to issue unregistered common shares or subsequently registered shares in connection with such transaction.

Repurchase of OP Units and/or the Participation Interest held by Hines and its Affiliates if Hines or its Affiliates Cease to be Our Advisor

In the event the Advisory Agreement expires without the consent of the Advisor, or is terminated for any reason other than by the Advisor, we may be required to repurchase all or a portion of the OP Units and Participation Interest held Hines and its affiliates. In such event, the purchase price is required to be paid in cash or common shares at the option of the holder. Please see “Management — The Advisor and the Advisory Agreement — Removal of the Advisor” and “Risk Factors — Investment Risks — The redemption of interests in the Operating Partnership held by Hines and its affiliates (including the Participation Interest) as required in our Advisory Agreement may discourage a takeover attempt if our Advisory Agreement would be terminated in connection therewith.” ;

Capital Contributions

If the Operating Partnership requires additional funds, any partner may, but is not required to, make an additional capital contribution to the Operating Partnership. We may loan to the Operating Partnership the proceeds of any loan obtained or debt securities issued by us so long as the terms of such loan to the Operating Partnership are substantially equivalent to the loan obtained or debt securities issued by us. If any partner contributes additional capital to the Operating Partnership, the partner will receive additional OP Units and its percentage interest in the Operating Partnership will be increased on a proportionate basis based upon the amount of such additional capital contributions and the value of the Operating Partnership at the time of such contributions.

As we accept subscriptions for shares, we will transfer substantially all of the net proceeds of the offering to the Operating Partnership as a capital contribution; however, we will be deemed to have made capital contributions in the amount of the gross offering proceeds received from investors. The Operating Partnership will be deemed to have simultaneously paid the selling commissions and other costs associated with the offering. Under the Partnership Agreement, we generally are obligated to contribute the proceeds of a securities offering as additional capital to the Operating Partnership in exchange for additional OP Units. In addition, we are authorized to cause the Operating Partnership to issue partnership interests for less than fair market value if we conclude in good faith that such issuance is in the best interests of us and the Operating Partnership.

156

Term

The Operating Partnership will be dissolved and its affairs wound up upon the earliest to occur of the following events:

• the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Operating Partnership; or

• unless reconstituted upon bankruptcy, the entry of a final judgment, order or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction adjudicating either the Operating Partnership or Hines REIT as bankrupt, and the expiration without appeal of the period, if any, allowed by applicable law to appeal therefrom.

Tax Matters

Hines REIT is the tax matters partner of the Operating Partnership and, as such, has the authority to handle tax audits and to make tax elections under the Code on behalf of the Operating Partnership.

Distributions

Generally, all available cash is distributed quarterly to or for the benefit of the partners of record as of the applicable record date. The term “available cash” means all cash receipts of the Operating Partnership from whatever source during the period in question in excess of all items of Operating Partnership expense (other than non-cash expenses such as depreciation) and other cash needs of the Operating Partnership, including real estate investments, debt payments, capital expenditures, payments to any dealer manager, advisor or property manager under any dealer, manager, advisor or property management agreement, other fees and expense reimbursements, funds used for redemptions, and any reserves (as determined by the general partner) established or increased during such period. In the discretion of the general partner of the Operating Partnership, but subject to the Partnership Agreement, reserves may include cash held for future acquisitions.

The Operating Partnership will distribute cash available for distribution to its partners at least quarterly. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement and subject to the rights of any holders of Preference Units, the Operating Partnership will distribute cash among the partners holding OP Units and the partner holding the Participation Interest in proportion to their respective percentage interests in the Operating Partnership. Please see “— The Participation Interest” above for a summary of how the percentage interests in the Operating Partnership are calculated.

Indemnity

The Operating Partnership must indemnify and hold Hines REIT (and its employees, directors, and/or officers) harmless from any liability, loss, cost or damage, including without limitation reasonable legal fees and court costs, incurred by it by reason of anything it may do or refrain from doing hereafter for and on behalf of the Operating Partnership or in connection with its business or affairs. However, the Operating Partnership will not be required to indemnify:

• Hines REIT for any liability, loss, cost or damage caused by its fraud, willful misconduct or gross negligence;

• officers and directors of Hines REIT (other than our independent directors) for any liability, loss, cost or damage caused by such person’s negligence or misconduct; or

• our independent directors for any liability, loss, cost or damage caused by their gross negligence or willful misconduct.

157

In addition, the Operating Partnership must reimburse Hines REIT for any amounts paid by it in satisfaction of indemnification obligations owed to its present or former directors and/or officers, as provided for in or pursuant to its corporate governance documents.

MATERIAL TAX CONSIDERATIONS

General

The following is a summary of the material federal income tax considerations generally applicable to the ownership of common shares. The following discussion does not cover all possible tax considerations and does not include a detailed discussion of any state, local or foreign tax considerations. Nor does it discuss all aspects of federal income taxation that may be relevant to a prospective shareholder in light of his or her particular circumstances or to certain types of shareholders (including insurance companies, tax-exempt entities, financial institutions or broker-dealers, and, except as described in “— Taxation of Foreign Investors” below, foreign corporations and persons who are not citizens or residents of the United States) who are subject to special treatment under the federal income tax laws.

The Code provisions governing the federal tax treatment of REITs are highly technical and complex. This summary is based on the following:

• current provisions of the Code;

• existing, temporary and currently proposed Treasury Regulations promulgated under the Code;

• the legislative history of the Code;

• existing administrative rulings; and

• judicial interpretations of the foregoing.

No assurance can be given that legislative, judicial or administrative changes will not affect the accuracy of any statements in this prospectus with respect to transactions entered into or contemplated prior to the effective date of such changes.

This discussion is not intended to be a substitute for careful tax planning. We urge each prospective investor to consult with his or her own tax advisor regarding the specific tax consequences applicable to him or her, in light of his or her particular circumstances, relating to the purchase, ownership and disposition of our common shares, including the federal, state, local, foreign and other tax consequences of such purchase, ownership, sale and disposition.

We elected to be treated as a REIT for federal income tax purposes commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2004. However, our qualification for taxation as a REIT depends on our ability in the future to meet the various qualification tests imposed by the Code discussed below. The rules governing REITs are highly technical and require ongoing compliance with a variety of tests that depend, among other things, on future operating results. While we expect to satisfy these tests, and will use our best efforts to do so, we cannot assure you that the actual results of our operations for any particular year will satisfy these requirements. We also cannot assure you that the applicable law will not change and adversely affect us and our shareholders. The consequences of failing to be taxed as a REIT are summarized in the ̶ 0;— Failure to Qualify as a REIT” section below.

Our counsel, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, has rendered its opinion that, based on the continuing accuracy of certain assumptions specified below:

• We were organized and operated in conformity with the requirements for classification as a REIT under the Code for our taxable year ended December 31, 2004;

• Our current organization and method of operation has enabled, and our proposed method of operation will enable, us to continue to meet the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT under the Code.

• The Operating Partnership will be properly classified as a partnership under the Code; and

• All statements of law and legal conclusions, but not statements of facts, contained in this “Material Tax Considerations” section are correct in all material respects.

The foregoing opinion is based on the assumptions that:

• our method of operation and share ownership structure are as described in this prospectus and in a certificate of an officer of Hines REIT;

• Hines REIT and its subsidiaries are, and will continue to be, organized and managed as set forth in this prospectus, and in each such entity’s relevant organizational documents;

• the organizational documents of Hines REIT and each of its subsidiaries are not amended or modified in any material respect, and all material terms and conditions in such documents are and will be complied with; and

• each of the written agreements to which we or any of our subsidiaries are a party will be implemented, construed and enforced in accordance with its terms.

Our qualification as a REIT under the Code depends upon our ongoing satisfaction of the various requirements under the Code and described herein relating to, among other things, the nature of our gross income, the composition of our assets, the level of distributions to our shareholders, and the diversity of the ownership of our stock. Greenberg Traurig, LLP will not review our compliance with these requirements on a continuing basis. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that we will satisfy these requirements.

Requirements for Qualification as a REIT

Organizational Requirements

In order to qualify as a REIT, we must meet the following criteria:

• We must be organized as a domestic entity that would, if we did not maintain our REIT status, be taxable as a regular corporation.

• We cannot be a financial institution or an insurance company.

• We must be managed by one or more trustees or directors.

• Our taxable year must be a calendar year.

• Our beneficial ownership must be evidenced by transferable shares.

• Beginning with the taxable year after the first taxable year for which we make an election to be taxed as a REIT, our capital stock must be held by at least 100 persons during at least 335 days of a taxable year of 12 months or during a proportionate part of a taxable year of less than 12 months.

• Beginning with the taxable year after the first taxable year for which we make an election to be taxed as a REIT, not more than 50% of the value of our shares of capital stock may be held, directly or indirectly, applying certain constructive ownership rules, by five or fewer individuals at any time during the last half of each of our taxable years. While generally a tax-exempt entity is treated as a single taxpayer for this purpose, a domestic qualified employee pension trust is not. Pursuant to a “look through” rule, the beneficiaries of such a pension trust will be treated as holding our common shares in proportion to their interests in the trust. If we do not satisfy the stock ownership test described in this paragraph in the absence of this look through rule, part of the income and gain recognized by certain qualified employee pension trusts attributable to the ownership of our common shares may be treated as unrelated business taxable income. Please see “— Taxation of Tax Exempt Entities.” We do not expect to have to rely on this rule in order to meet the stock ownership requirement described in this paragraph.

• We must elect to be taxed as a REIT and satisfy certain filing and other administrative requirements.

158

To protect against violations of these requirements, our charter contains restrictions on transfers of our capital stock, as well as provisions that automatically convert shares of stock into Excess Securities to the extent that the ownership thereof otherwise might jeopardize our REIT status. Please see “Description of Capital Stock — Restrictions on Transfer.” There is no assurance, however, that these restrictions will in all cases prevent us from failing to satisfy the share ownership requirements described above.

We are required to maintain records disclosing the actual ownership of common shares in order to monitor our compliance with the share ownership requirements. To do so, we may demand written statements each year from the record holders of certain minimum percentages of our shares in which such record holders must disclose the actual owners of the shares (i.e., the persons required to include our dividends in their gross income). A list of those persons failing or refusing to comply with this demand will be maintained as part of our records. Shareholders who fail or refuse to comply with the demand must submit a statement with their tax returns disclosing the actual ownership of our shares and certain other information.

We believe that we have satisfied each of the requirements discussed above beginning with our taxable year ended December 31, 2004. We also believe that we have satisfied the requirements that are separately described below concerning the nature and amounts of our income and assets and the levels of required annual distributions beginning with our taxable year ended December 31, 2004. Our counsel, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, has rendered its opinions that, based on the continuing accuracy of certain assumptions specified in “Material Tax Considerations — General” above, we were organized and operated in conformity with the requirements for classification as a REIT under the Code for our taxable years ended December 31, 2004 through 2007, and our current organization and method of operation has enabled, and our proposed method of operation will enable, us to continue to meet the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT under the Code.

Our qualification as a REIT under the Code depends upon our ongoing satisfaction of the various requirements under the Code and described below relating to, among other things, the nature of our gross income, the composition of our assets, the level of distributions to our shareholders, and the diversity of the ownership of our stock. Greenberg Traurig, LLP will not review our compliance with these requirements on a continuing basis. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that we will satisfy these requirements.

Operational Requirements — Gross Income Tests

In order to qualify as a REIT for a particular year, we must meet two tests governing the sources of our income. These tests are designed to ensure that a REIT derives its income principally from passive real estate investments. In evaluating a REIT’s income, the REIT will be treated as receiving its proportionate share (based on its interest in partnership capital) of the income produced by any partnership in which the REIT holds an interest as a partner. Any such income will retain the character that it has in the hands of the partnership. The Code allows us to own and operate a number of our properties through wholly-owned subsidiaries that are “qualified REIT subsidiaries.” The Code provides that a qualified REIT subsidiary is not treated as a separate corporation, and all of its assets, liabilities and items of i ncome, deduction and credit are treated as assets, liabilities and such items of the REIT.

75% Gross Income Test

At least 75% of our gross income for each taxable year must be derived from specified classes of income that are related to real estate or income earned by our cash or cash equivalents. The permitted categories of income currently relevant to us are:

• “rents from real property” (as described below);

• gains from the sale of real property (excluding gain from the sale of property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of the Company’s trade or business, referred to below as “dealer property”);

• abatements and refunds of real property taxes;

159

• dividends or other distributions on, and gain (other than gain from prohibited transactions) from the sale or other disposition of, shares in other REITs;

• interest on obligations secured by mortgages on real property or on interests in real property; and

• “qualified temporary investment income” (which generally means income that is attributable to stock or debt instruments, is attributable to the temporary investment of capital received from our issuance of capital stock or debt securities that have a maturity of at least five years, and is received or accrued by us within one year from the date we receive such capital).

In evaluating our compliance with the 75% gross income test, as well as the 95% gross income test described below, gross income does not include gross income from “prohibited transactions.” In general, a prohibited transaction is one involving a sale of dealer property, not including certain dealer property held by us for at least four years. In other words, we are generally required to acquire and hold properties for investment rather than be in the business of buying and selling properties.

We expect that substantially all of our operating gross income will be considered “rent from real property.” “Rent from real property” is qualifying income for purposes of the gross income tests in accordance with the rules summarized below.

• “Rent from real property” can include rent attributable to personal property we lease in connection with the real property so long as the personal property rent does not exceed 15% of the total rent attributable to the lease. We do not expect to earn material amounts of rent attributable to personal property.

• “Rent from real property” generally does not include rent based on the income or profits of the tenant leasing the property. We do not currently, nor do we intend to, lease property and receive rentals based on the tenant’s net income or profit.

• “Rent from real property” can include rent based on a percentage of a tenant’s gross sales or gross receipts. We may have some leases, from time to time, where rent is based on a percentage of gross sales or receipts.

• “Rent from real property” cannot include rent we receive from a person or corporation (or subtenant of such person of corporation) in which we (or any of our 10% or greater owners) directly or constructively own a 10% or greater interest.

• “Rent from real property” generally cannot include amounts we receive with respect to services we provide for tenants, unless such services are “usually and customarily rendered” in connection with the rental of space for occupancy only or are not considered “rendered to the occupant.” If the services we provide do not meet this standard, they will be treated as impermissible tenant services, and the income we derive from the property will not qualify as “rent from real property,” unless the amount of such impermissible tenant services income does not exceed one percent of all amounts received from the property. We are allowed to operate or manage our properties, or provide services to our tenants, through an “independent contractor” from whom we do not derive any income or through taxable REIT su bsidiaries.

Upon the ultimate sale of any of our properties, any gains realized also are expected to constitute qualifying income, as gain from the sale of real property (not involving a prohibited transaction).

We expect to invest proceeds we receive from the offering covered by this prospectus in government securities or certificates of deposit. Income derived from these investments is qualifying income under the 75% gross income test to the extent earned during the first year after receipt of such proceeds. To the extent that proceeds from this offering are not invested in properties prior to the expiration of this one year period, we may invest such proceeds in less liquid investments such as mortgage-backed securities or shares in other entities taxed as REITs. This would allow us to continue to include the income from such invested proceeds as qualified income for purposes of our qualifying as a REIT.

160

95% Gross Income Test

In addition to earning 75% of our gross income from the sources listed above, at least 95% of our gross income for each taxable year must come either from those sources, or from dividends, interest or gains from the sale or other disposition of stock or other securities that do not constitute dealer property. This test permits a REIT to earn a significant portion of its income from traditional “passive” investment sources that are not necessarily real estate related. The term “interest” (under both the 75% and 95% tests) does not include amounts that are based on the income or profits of any person, unless the computation is based only on a fixed percentage of gross receipts or sales.

Failing the 75% or the 95% Gross Income Tests; Reasonable Cause

As a result of the 75% and 95% gross income tests, REITs generally are not permitted to earn more than 5% of their gross income from active sources (such as brokerage commissions or other fees for services rendered). We may receive certain types of such income; however, we do not expect such non-qualifying income to be significant and we expect further that such income will always be less than 5% of our annual gross income. While we do not anticipate we will earn substantial amounts of our non-qualifying income, if non-qualifying income exceeds 5% of our gross income, we could lose our REIT status.

If we fail to meet either the 75% or 95% gross income tests during a taxable year, we may still qualify as a REIT for that year if:

• following our identification of the failure to meet either or both of such income tests for any taxable year, a description of each item of our gross income is set forth in a schedule filed by us for such taxable year; and

• our failure to meet the tests is due to reasonable cause and not to willful neglect.

However, in that case we would be subject to a 100% tax based on the greater of the amount by which we fail either the 75% or 95% gross income tests for such year, multiplied by a fraction intended to reflect our profitability, as described in the “— Taxation as a REIT” section below.

Operational Requirements — Asset Tests

On the last day of each calendar quarter, we also must meet two tests concerning the nature of our investments.

First, at least 75% of the value of our total assets generally must consist of real estate assets, cash, cash items (including receivables) and government securities. For this purpose, “real estate assets” include interests in real property, interests in loans secured by mortgages on real property or by certain interests in real property, shares in other REITs and certain options, but do not include mineral, oil or gas royalty interests. The temporary investment of new capital in stock or debt instruments also qualifies under this 75% asset test, but only for the one-year period beginning on the date we receive the new capital.

Second, although the balance of our assets generally may be invested without restriction, we will not be permitted to own (i) securities (other than securities qualifying under the 75% asset test described above and securities of taxable REIT subsidiaries) of any single issuer that represent more than 5% of the value of our total assets, (ii) more than 10% of the total voting power of the outstanding voting securities of any single issuer (other than securities qualifying under the 75% asset test described above and securities of taxable REIT subsidiaries), (iii) securities of any single issuer which have a value of more than 10% of the total value of all the outstanding securities of such issuer, excluding, for these purposes, securities qualifying under the 75% asset test described above, securities of a taxable REIT s ubsidiary, and securities described in the following paragraph, or (iv) securities of one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries that represent more than 20% of the value of our total assets. In evaluating a REIT’s assets, the REIT generally is deemed to own a proportionate share of each of the assets of any partnership in which it invests (such as the Operating Partnership) based on the percentage interest held by the REIT in partnership capital, subject to special rules that are applicable under the 10% asset test (described in clause (iii) above) which take into account the REIT’s interest in certain securities issued by the partnership.

161

Securities for purposes of the foregoing asset tests may include debt securities. The 10% value limitation (described in clause (iii) of the preceding paragraph) will not apply, however, to (i) any security qualifying as “straight debt” within the meaning of the Code, (ii) any loan to an individual or an estate; (iii) any rental agreement described in Section 467 of the Code, other than with a “related person”; (iv) any obligation to pay qualifying rents from real property; (v) certain securities issued by a State or any political subdivision thereof, the District of Columbia, a foreign government, or any political subdivision thereof, or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; (vi) any security issued by a REIT; and (vii) any other arrangement that, as determined by the Sec retary of the Treasury, is excepted from the definition of a security. For purposes of the 10% value test, any debt instrument issued by a partnership (other than straight debt or another excluded security) will not be considered a security issued by the partnership if at least 75% of the partnership’s gross income is derived from sources that would qualify for the 75% REIT gross income test and any debt instrument issued by a partnership (other than straight debt or other excluded security) will not be considered a security issued by the partnership to the extent of the REIT’s interest as a partner in the partnership. There are special look-through rules for determining a REIT’s share of securities held by a partnership in which the REIT holds an interest.

After initially meeting the asset tests at the close of any quarter, we will not lose our status as a REIT for failure to satisfy the asset tests at the end of a later quarter solely by reason of changes in asset values. If the failure to satisfy the asset tests results from an acquisition of securities or other property during a quarter, we can cure the failure by disposing of a sufficient amount of non-qualifying assets within 30 days after the close of that quarter.

Even after the 30-day cure period, if we fail the 5% securities limitation or either of the 10% securities limitations, we may avoid disqualification as a REIT by disposing of a sufficient amount of non-qualifying assets to cure the violation if the assets causing the violation do not exceed the lesser of 1% of our assets at the end of the relevant quarter or $10 million, provided that, in either case, the disposition occurs within six months following the last day of the quarter in which we first identified the violation. For other violations of any of the REIT asset tests due to reasonable cause, we may avoid disqualification as a REIT after the 30-day cure period by taking certain steps, including the disposition of sufficient non-qualifying assets within the six month period described above to meet the applicable asset test, p aying a tax equal to the greater of $50,000 or the highest corporate tax rate multiplied by the net income generated by the non-qualifying assets during the period of time that the assets were held as non-qualifying assets and filing a schedule with the Internal Revenue Service that describes the non-qualifying assets. We intend to maintain adequate records of the value of our assets to ensure compliance with the asset tests and to take such other actions within 30 days after the close of any quarter as necessary to cure any noncompliance.

Operational Requirements — Annual Distribution Requirement

In order to qualify as a REIT, we generally must distribute to our shareholders in each taxable year at least 90% of our net ordinary income (capital gains are not required to be distributed). More precisely, we must distribute an amount equal to (i) 90% of the sum of (a) our “REIT taxable income” before deduction of dividends paid and excluding any net capital gain and (b) any net income from property we foreclose on less the tax on such income, minus (ii) limited categories of “excess non-cash income” (including, cancellation of indebtedness and original issue discount income). In order to meet the foregoing requirement, the distributions on any particular class of shares must be pro rata, with no preference to any share of stock as compared with other shares of the same class, and with no preference to one class of stock as compared with another class except to the extent that the former is entitled to such preference under our organizational documents.

REIT taxable income is defined to be the taxable income of the REIT, computed as if it were a corporation, with certain modifications. For example, the deduction for dividends paid is allowed, but neither net income from foreclosure property nor net income from prohibited transactions, is included. In addition, a REIT may carry forward, but not carry back, a net operating loss for 20 years following the year in which it was incurred.

162

A REIT may satisfy the 90% distribution test with dividends paid during the taxable year and with dividends paid after the end of the taxable year if the dividends fall within one of the following categories:

• Dividends declared by us in October, November, or December of a particular year and payable to our shareholders of record on a date during such month of such year will be deemed to have been paid during such year so long as such dividends are actually paid by us by January 31 of the following year.

• Dividends declared after the end of, but before the due date (including extensions) of our tax return for, a particular taxable year will be deemed to have been paid during such taxable year if such dividends are actually paid by us (i) within 12 months of the end of such taxable year and (ii) no later than the date of our next regular dividend payment made after such declaration.

Dividends that are paid after the close of a taxable year that do not qualify under the rule governing payments made in January (described above) will be taxable to the shareholders in the year paid, even though we may take them into account for a prior year. Additionally, such dividends will be treated as paid by us in the year actually paid, for purposes of determining the application of the 4% excise tax for the prior year.

It is possible that we may not have sufficient cash or other liquid assets to meet the distribution requirements discussed above. This could arise because of competing demands for our funds, or because of timing differences between taxable income recognition and actual cash receipts and disbursements. Although we do not anticipate any difficulty in meeting the REIT distribution requirements, we cannot assure you that necessary funds will be available. In the event this occurs, we may arrange for short-term, or possibly long-term, borrowings to allow us to pay the required dividends and meet the 90% distribution requirement.

If we fail to meet the 90% distribution requirement because of an adjustment to our taxable income by the Internal Revenue Service, we may be able to retroactively cure the failure by paying a “deficiency dividend,” as well as applicable interest and penalties, within a specified period.

In computing our REIT taxable income, we will use the accrual method of accounting. We are required to file an annual federal income tax return, which, like other corporate returns, is subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service. Because the tax law requires us to make many judgments regarding the proper treatment of a transaction or an item of income or deduction, it is possible that the Internal Revenue Service will challenge positions we take in computing our REIT taxable income and our distributions. Issues could arise, for example, with respect to the allocation of the purchase price of properties between depreciable or amortizable assets and nondepreciable or non-amortizable assets such as land, and the current deductibility of fees paid to the Advisor or its affiliates. If the Internal Revenue Service successfully cha llenges our characterization of a transaction or determination of our taxable income, we could be found to have failed to satisfy a requirement required to maintain our taxable status as a REIT. If, as a result of a challenge, we are determined to have failed to satisfy the distribution requirements for a taxable year, we would be disqualified as a REIT, unless we were permitted to pay a deficiency distribution to our shareholders, as well as any required interest thereon to the Internal Revenue Service. A deficiency distribution cannot be used to satisfy the distribution requirement, however, if the failure to meet the requirement is not due to a later adjustment to our income by the Internal Revenue Service.

Operational Requirements — Recordkeeping

In order to qualify as a REIT, we must maintain certain records as set forth in Treasury Regulations. Further, as we discussed above, we must request, on an annual basis, certain information designed to disclose the ownership of our outstanding shares. We intend to comply with these requirements.

Recently Enacted Relief Provisions

In addition to the statutory relief provisions discussed above, the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 created additional relief provisions for REITs. If we fail to satisfy one or more of the requirements for qualification as a REIT, other than the income tests and asset tests discussed above, we will not lose our status as a REIT if our failure is due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect and we pay a penalty of $50,000 for each such failure.

163

Taxation as a REIT

Once we qualify as a REIT, we generally will not be subject to corporate income tax to the extent we distribute our REIT taxable income to our shareholders. This treatment effectively eliminates the “double taxation” (i.e., taxation at both the corporate and shareholder levels) imposed on investments in most corporations. We generally will be taxed only on the portion of our taxable income that we retain, including any undistributed net capital gain, because we will be entitled to a deduction for dividends paid to our shareholders during the taxable year. A “dividends paid” deduction is not available for dividends that are considered preferential within any given class of shares or as between classes except to the extent such class is entitled to such preference. We do not anticipate we will pay any such prefere ntial dividends.

Even as a REIT, we will be subject to tax in the following circumstances:

• we will be taxed at regular corporate rates on our undistributed taxable income, including undistributed net capital gains;

• a tax of 100% applies to any net income we receive from prohibited transactions, (as mentioned, these transactions are usually sales or other dispositions of property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business);

• if we fail to meet either the 75% or 95% gross income test previously described, but still qualify for REIT status under the reasonable cause exception to those tests, we will be subject to a 100% tax on the amount obtained by multiplying (i) the greater of the amount, if any, by which we failed either the 75% gross income test or the 95% gross income test, times (ii) the ratio of our REIT taxable income to our gross income (excluding capital gain and certain other items);

• under some circumstances, we will be subject to the alternative minimum tax;

• we will be subject to a 4% excise tax if we fail, in any calendar year, to distribute to our shareholders an amount equal to the sum of 85% of our REIT ordinary income for such year, 95% of our REIT capital gain net income for such year, and any undistributed taxable income from prior years;

• if we acquire any asset from a C-corporation (i.e., a corporation generally subject to corporate level tax) in a carry-over basis transaction and then recognize gain on the disposition of the asset within 10 years after we acquired the asset, then a portion of our gain may by subject to tax at the highest regular corporate rate (currently 35%);

• any income (other than income otherwise qualifying for REIT purposes) or gain we receive from foreclosure property will be taxed at the highest corporate rate (currently 35%); and

• a tax of 100% applies in certain cases to the extent that income is shifted away from, or deductions are shifted to, any taxable REIT subsidiary through the use of certain non-arm’s length pricing arrangements between the REIT and such taxable REIT subsidiary.

Failure to Qualify as a REIT

If we fail to qualify as a REIT and are not successful in obtaining relief, we will be taxed at regular corporate rates on all of our taxable income. Distributions to our shareholders would not be deductible in computing our taxable income and we would no longer be required to pay dividends. Any corporate level taxes generally would reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to our shareholders and, because our shareholders would continue to be taxed on any distributions they receive, the net after tax yield to our shareholders likely would be substantially reduced.

As a result, our failure to qualify as a REIT during any taxable year could have a material adverse effect on us and our shareholders. If we lose our REIT status, unless we are able to obtain relief, we will not be eligible to elect REIT status again until the fifth taxable year that begins after the taxable year during which our election was terminated.

164

Taxation of Shareholders

Distributions

In general, distributions paid by us to our shareholders (who are not “Non-U.S. Shareholders” as defined below in “— Taxation of Foreign Investors”) during periods we qualify as a REIT will be taxable as follows:

• Except as provided below, dividends will generally be taxable to our shareholders, as ordinary income, in the year in which such dividends are actually or constructively received by them, to the extent of our current or accumulated earnings and profits.

• Dividends declared during the last quarter of a calendar year and actually paid during January of the immediately following calendar year are generally treated as if received by the shareholders on December 31 of the calendar year during which they were declared.

• Dividends paid to shareholders will not constitute passive activity income, and as a result generally cannot be offset by losses from passive activities of a shareholder subject to the passive activity rules.

• Distributions we designate as capital gains dividends generally will be taxed as capital gains to shareholders to the extent that the distributions do not exceed our actual net capital gain for the taxable year. Corporate shareholders may be required to treat up to 20% of any such capital gains dividends as ordinary income.

• If we elect to retain and pay income tax on any net long-term capital gain, our shareholders would include in their income as long-term capital gain their proportionate share of such net long-term capital gain. Each of our shareholders would receive a credit for such shareholder’s proportionate share of the tax paid by us on such retained capital gains and an increase in tax basis in their shares in an amount equal to the difference between the undistributed long-term capital gains and the amount of tax we paid.

• No portion of the dividends paid by us, whether characterized as ordinary income or as capital gains, are eligible for the “dividends received” deduction for corporations.

• Shareholders are not permitted to deduct our losses or loss carry-forwards.

Future regulations may require that the shareholders take into account, for purposes of computing their individual alternative minimum tax liability, certain of our tax preference items.

We may generate cash in excess of our net earnings. If we distribute cash to our shareholders in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits, other than as a capital gain dividend, the excess cash will be deemed to be a non-taxable return of capital to each shareholder to the extent of the adjusted tax basis of the shareholder’s shares. Distributions in excess of the adjusted tax basis will be treated as gain from the sale or exchange of the shares. A shareholder who has received a distribution in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits may, upon the sale of the shares, realize a higher taxable gain or a smaller loss because the basis of the shares as reduced will be used for purposes of computing the amount of the gain or loss.

Dispositions of the Shares

Generally, gain or loss realized by a shareholder upon the sale of common shares will be reportable as capital gain or loss. Such gain or loss will be treated as long-term capital gain or loss if the shares have been held for more than 12 months and as short-term capital gain or loss if the shares have been held for 12 months or less. If a shareholder receives a long- term capital gain dividend and has held the shares for six months or less, any loss incurred on the sale or exchange of the shares is treated as a long-term capital loss to the extent of the corresponding long-term capital gain dividend received.

If a shareholder has shares of our common stock redeemed by us, such shareholder will be treated as if such shareholder sold the redeemed shares if all of such shareholder’s shares of our common stock are redeemed or if such redemption is not essentially equivalent to a dividend within the meaning of Section 302(b)(1) of the Code or substantially disproportionate within the meaning of Section 302(b)(2) of the Code. If a redemption is not treated as a sale of the redeemed shares, it will be treated as a dividend distribution. Shareholders should consult with their tax advisors regarding the taxation of any particular redemption of our shares.

165

Our Failure to Qualify as a REIT

In any year in which we fail to qualify as a REIT, our shareholders generally will continue to be treated in the same fashion described above, except that:

• none of our distributions will be eligible for treatment as capital gains dividends;

• corporate shareholders will qualify for the “dividends received” deduction; and

• shareholders will not be required to report any share of our tax preference items.

Backup Withholding

We will report to our shareholders and the Internal Revenue Service the amount of dividends paid during each calendar year and the amount of tax withheld, if any. If a shareholder is subject to backup withholding, we will be required to deduct and withhold from any dividends payable to that shareholder a tax equal to 28% of the amount of any such dividends. These rules may apply in the following circumstances:

• when a shareholder fails to supply a correct and properly certified taxpayer identification number (which, for an individual, is his or her Social Security Number);

• when the Internal Revenue Service notifies us that the shareholder is subject to the backup withholding rules;

• when a shareholder furnishes an incorrect taxpayer identification number; or

• in the case of corporations or others within certain exempt categories, when they fail to demonstrate that fact when required.

A shareholder that does not provide a correct taxpayer identification number may also be subject to penalties imposed by the Internal Revenue Service. Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Rather, any amount withheld as backup withholding will be credited against the shareholder’s actual federal income tax liability. We also may be required to withhold a portion of capital gain distributions made to shareholders that fail to certify their non-foreign status.

Taxation of Tax Exempt Entities

Income earned by tax-exempt entities (such as employee pension benefit trusts, individual retirement accounts, charitable remainder trusts, etc.) is generally exempt from federal income taxation, unless such income consists of “unrelated business taxable income” (“UBTI”) as such term is defined in the Code. In general, dividends received or gain realized on our shares by a tax-exempt entity will not constitute UBTI. However, if a tax-exempt entity has financed the acquisition of its shares with “acquisition indebtedness” within the meaning of the Code, part or all of such income or gain would constitute UBTI.

If we were deemed to be “predominately held” by qualified employee pension benefit trusts and we were required to rely on the special look-through rule for purposes of meeting the relevant REIT stock ownership tests as more particularly described in “— Requirements for Qualification as a REIT — Organizational Requirements” above, part of the income and gain recognized by such trusts holding more than 10% in value of our shares attributable to the ownership of our common shares may be treated as UBTI. We would be deemed to be “predominately held” by such trusts if either one employee pension benefit trust owns more than 25% in value of our shares, or any group of such trusts, each owning more than 10% in value of our shares, holds in the aggregate more than 50% in value of our sh ares. If either of these ownership thresholds were ever exceeded and we were required to rely on the special look-through rule for purposes of meeting the relevant REIT stock ownership tests, a portion of the income and gain recognized attributable to the ownership of our shares by any qualified employee pension benefit trust holding more than 10% in value of our shares would be treated as UBTI that is subject to tax. Such portion would be equal to the percentage of our income which would be UBTI if we were a qualified trust, rather than a REIT. We do not expect to have to rely on the look-through rule for purposes of meeting the relevant REIT stock ownership tests. Moreover, we will attempt to monitor the concentration of ownership of employee pension benefit trusts of our shares, and we do not expect our shares to be “predominately held” by qualified employee pension benefit trusts for purposes of the foregoing rules. However, there is no assurance in this regard.

166

For social clubs, voluntary employee benefit associations, supplemental unemployment benefit trusts and qualified group legal services plans exempt from federal income taxation under Sections 501(c)(7), (c)(9), (c)(17) and (c)(20) of the Code, respectively, income from an investment in our securities will constitute UBTI unless the organization is able to deduct an amount properly set aside or placed in reserve for certain purposes so as to offset the UBTI generated by the investment in our securities. These prospective investors should consult their own tax advisors concerning the “set aside” and reserve requirements.

Taxation of Foreign Investors

The rules governing the federal income taxation of nonresident alien individuals, foreign corporations, foreign partnerships and other foreign shareholders (collectively, “Non-U.S. Shareholders”) are complex and no attempt will be made herein to provide more than a summary of such rules. Non-U.S. investors should consult with their own tax advisors to determine the impact that federal, state and local income tax or similar laws will have on them as a result of an investment in the Company.

Distributions

General

Distributions paid by us that are not attributable to gain from our sales or exchanges of United States real property interests and not designated by us as capital gain dividends will be treated as dividends of ordinary income to the extent that they are made out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits. Such dividends to Non-U.S. Shareholders ordinarily will be subject to a withholding tax equal to 30% of the gross amount of the dividend unless an applicable tax treaty reduces or eliminates that tax. However, if income from the investment in the common shares is treated as effectively connected with the Non-U.S. Shareholder’s conduct of a United States trade or business, the Non-U.S. Shareholder generally will be subject to a tax at the graduated rates applicable to ordinary income, in the same manner as U.S. shareholders are taxed with respect to such dividends (and may also be subject to the 30% branch profits tax in the case of a shareholder that is a foreign corporation that is not entitled to any treaty exemption). Distributions in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits will not be taxable to a shareholder to the extent they do not exceed the adjusted basis of the shareholder’s shares. Instead, they will reduce the adjusted basis of such shares. To the extent that such distributions exceed the adjusted basis of a Non-U.S. Shareholder’s shares, they will give rise to tax liability if the Non-U.S. Shareholder would otherwise be subject to tax on any gain from the sale or disposition of his shares, as described in “— Sales of Shares” below.

Distributions Attributable to Sale or Exchange of Real Property

As long as our stock is not regularly traded in an established securities market within the United States, distributions that are attributable to gain from our sales or exchanges of United States real property interests will be taxed to a Non-U.S. Shareholder as if such gain were effectively connected with a United States trade or business. Non-U.S. Shareholders would thus be taxed at the normal capital gain rates applicable to U.S. shareholders, and would be subject to applicable alternative minimum tax and a special alternative minimum tax in the case of nonresident alien individuals. Also, such distributions may be subject to a 30% branch profits tax in the hands of a corporate Non-U.S. Shareholder not entitled to any treaty exemption.

If our shares of common stock are ever “regularly traded” on an established securities market in the United States, then, with respect to distributions by us that are attributable to gain from the sale or exchange of a United States real property interest, a Non-U.S. Shareholder who does not own more than 5% of our common stock at any time during the taxable year:

167

• will be taxed on such capital gain dividend as if the distribution was an ordinary dividend;

• will generally not be required to report distributions received from us on U.S. federal income tax returns; and

• will not be subject to a branch profits tax with respect to such distribution. At the time you purchase shares in this offering, our shares will not be publicly traded, and we can give you no assurance that our shares will ever be publicly traded on an established securities exchange.

Although the law is not clear on this matter, it appears that amounts designated by us as undistributed capital gains in respect of the common stock generally should be treated with respect to Non-U.S. Shareholders in the same manner as actual distributions by us of capital gain dividends. Under that approach, the Non-U.S. Shareholder would be able to offset as a credit against his or her resulting federal income tax liability an amount equal to his or her proportionate share of the tax paid by us on the undistributed capital gains and to receive from the Internal Revenue Service a refund to the extent his or her proportionate share of this tax paid by us was to exceed his or her actual federal income tax liability.

Tax Withholding on Distributions

For withholding tax purposes, we will generally withhold tax at the rate of 30% on the amount of any distribution (other than distributions designated as capital gain dividends) made to a Non-U.S. Shareholder, unless the Non-U.S. Shareholder provides us with a properly completed Internal Revenue Service Form W-8BEN evidencing that such Non-U.S. Shareholder is eligible for an exemption or reduced rate under an applicable tax treaty (in which case we will withhold at the lower treaty rate) or Form W-8ECI claiming that the dividend is effectively connected with the Non-U.S. Shareholder’s conduct of a trade or business within the United States (in which case we will not withhold tax). We are also generally required to withhold tax at the rate of 35% on the portion of any distribution to a Non-U.S. S hareholder that is or could be designated by us as a capital gain dividend. In addition, we may be required to withhold 10% of distributions in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits. Such withheld amounts of tax do not represent actual tax liabilities but, rather, represent payments in respect of those tax liabilities described in the preceding two paragraphs. Thus, such withheld amounts are creditable by the Non-U.S. Shareholder against its actual U.S. federal income tax liabilities, including those described in the preceding two paragraphs. The Non-U.S. Shareholder would be entitled to a refund of any amounts withheld in excess of such Non-U.S. Shareholder’s actual U.S. federal income tax liabilities, provided that the Non-U.S. Shareholder files applicable returns or refund claims with the Internal Revenue Service.

Sales of Shares

Gain recognized by a Non-U.S. Shareholder upon a sale of shares generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income taxation, provided that:

• such gain is not effectively connected with the conduct by such Non-U.S. Shareholder of a trade or business within the United States;

• the Non-U.S. Shareholder is not present in the United States for 183 days or more during the taxable year and certain other conditions apply; and

• we are a “domestically controlled REIT,” which generally means that less than 50% in value of our shares continues to be held directly or indirectly by foreign persons during a continuous 5-year period ending on the date of disposition or, if shorter, during the entire period of our existence; provided, however, that even if we are a “domestically controlled REIT,” a Non-U.S. Shareholder may be treated as having gain that is subject to U.S. federal income taxation if the Non-U.S. Shareholder (i) disposes of our common shares within a 30-day period preceding the ex-dividend date of a distribution on our common shares, any portion of which, but for such disposition, would have been treated as gain from the sale or exchange of a U.S. real property interest and (ii) acquires, or enters into a contract or option to acquire, other shares of our common stock within 30 days after such ex-dividend date.

168

We cannot assure you that we will qualify as a “domestically controlled REIT.” If we are not a domestically controlled REIT, a Non-U.S. Shareholder’s sale of common shares will be subject to tax, unless (i) the first two conditions described above are met, (ii) the common shares were regularly traded on an established securities market; and (iii) the selling Non-U.S. Shareholder has not directly, or indirectly, owned during a specified testing period more than 5% in value of our common shares. In this regard, at the time you purchase shares in this offering, our shares will not be publicly traded, and we can give you no assurance that our shares will ever be publicly traded on an established securities exchange or that we will be a domestically controlled qualified investment entity. If the ga in on the sale of shares were to be subject to taxation, the Non-U.S. Shareholder will be subject to the same treatment as U.S. shareholders with respect to such gain and the purchaser of such common shares may be required to withhold 10% of the gross purchase price.

If a Non-U.S. Shareholder has shares of our common stock redeemed by us, such Non-U.S. Shareholder will be treated as if such Non-U.S. Shareholder sold the redeemed shares if all of such Non-U.S. Shareholder of our common stock are redeemed or if such redemption is not essentially equivalent to a dividend within the meaning of Section 302(b)(1) of the Code or substantially disproportionate within the meaning of Section 302(b)(2) of the Code. If a redemption is not treated as a sale of the redeemed shares, it will be treated as a dividend distribution. Non-U.S. Shareholders should consult with their tax advisors regarding the taxation of any particular redemption of our shares.

State and Local Taxes

We may be subject to state or local taxation. In addition, our shareholders may also be subject to state or local taxation. Consequently, you should consult your own tax advisors regarding the effect of state and local tax laws on an investment in our securities.

Tax Aspects of the Operating Partnership

The following discussion summarizes the material United States federal income tax considerations applicable to our investment in the Operating Partnership. This summary does not address tax consequences under state, local or foreign tax laws and does not discuss all aspects of federal law that may affect the tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of an interest in the Operating Partnership.

Tax Treatment of the Operating Partnership

The Operating Partnership will be treated as a pass-through entity that does not incur any federal income tax liability, provided that the Operating Partnership is classified for federal income tax purposes as a partnership rather than as a corporation or an association taxable as a corporation. The Operating Partnership has been formed as a Delaware limited partnership under the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act. An organization formed as a partnership under applicable state partnership law will be treated as a partnership, rather than as a corporation, for federal income tax purposes if:

• it is not expressly classified as a corporation under Section 301.7701-2(b)(1) through (8) of the Treasury Regulations;

• it does not elect to be classified as an association taxable as a corporation; and

• either (i) it is not classified as a “publicly traded partnership” under Section 7704 of the Code or (ii) 90% or more of it’s gross income consists of specified types of “qualifying income” within the meaning of Section 7704(c)(2) of the Code (including interest, dividends, “real property rents” and gains from the disposition of real property). A partnership is deemed to be a “publicly traded partnership” if its interests are either (a) traded on an established securities market or (b) readily tradable on a secondary market (or the substantial equivalent thereof).

169

Pursuant to the Treasury Regulations under Section 7704, the determination of whether a partnership is publicly traded is generally based on a facts and circumstances analysis. However, the regulations provide limited “safe harbors” which preclude publicly traded partnership status. The Partnership Agreement of the Operating Partnership contains certain limitations on transfers and redemptions of partnership interests which are intended to cause the Operating Partnership to qualify for an exemption from publicly traded partnership status under one or more of the safe harbors contained in the applicable regulations. Moreover, we expect that at least 90% of the Operating Partnership’s gross income will consist of “qualifying income” within the meaning of Section 7704(c)(2) of the Code. Finally, the Operating Partnership is not expressly classified as, and will not elect to be classified as, a corporation under the Treasury Regulations. Our counsel, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, has rendered its opinion that the Operating Partnership is properly classified as a partnership under the Code, assuming that no election is made by the Operating Partnership to be classified as a corporation under the Treasury Regulations.

If for any reason the Operating Partnership were taxable as a corporation, rather than as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, we would not be able to satisfy the income and asset requirements for REIT status. Further, the Operating Partnership would be required to pay income tax at corporate tax rates on its net income, and distributions to its partners would constitute dividends that would not be deductible in computing the Operating Partnership’s taxable income and would be taxable to us. Any change in the Operating Partnership’s status for tax purposes could also, in certain cases, be treated as a taxable event, in which case we might incur a tax liability without any related cash distribution.

The following discussion assumes that the Operating Partnership will be treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes.

Tax Treatment of Partners

Income and Loss Pass-Through

No federal income tax will be paid by the Operating Partnership. Instead, each partner, including Hines REIT, is required to report on its income tax return its allocable share of income, gains, losses, deductions and credits of the Operating Partnership, regardless of whether the Operating Partnership makes any distributions. Our allocable shares of income, gains, losses, deductions and credits of the Operating Partnership are generally determined by the terms of the Partnership Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 704(c) of the Code, income, gain, loss and deduction attributable to property that is contributed to a partnership in exchange for an interest in such partnership must be allocated in a manner that takes into account the unrealized tax gain or loss associated with the property at the time of the contribution. The amount of such unrealized tax gain or loss is generally equal to the difference between the fair market value of the contributed property at the time of contribution and the adjusted tax basis of such property at the time of contribution (a “book/tax difference”). Such allocations are solely for federal income tax purposes and do not affect the book capital accounts or other economic or legal arrangements among the partners. As a result of these rules, certain partners that contributed prop erty with a book/tax difference may be allocated depreciation deductions for tax purposes which are lower than such deductions would be if determined on a pro-rata basis and in the event of a disposition of any contributed asset which has a book/tax difference, all income attributable to such book/tax difference will generally be allocated to the partner that contributed such asset to the Operating Partnership and the other partners will generally be allocated only their share of capital gains attributable to the appreciation in the value of such asset, if any, since the date of such contribution.

Although the special allocation rules of Section 704(c) are generally intended to cause the amount of tax allocations with respect to contributed property which are made to partners other than the contributing partner to equal the amount of book allocations to such other partners, the rules do not always have this result. Thus, in certain cases we may be allocated, with respect to property which has a book/tax difference and has been contributed by other partners, tax depreciation and other tax deductions that are less than, and possibly an amount of taxable income or gain on the sale of such property which is greater than, the amount of book depreciation, deductions, income or gain which is allocated to us. This may cause us to recognize taxable income in excess of cash proceeds, which might adversely affect our ability to comply with the REIT distribution requirements.

170

The foregoing principles also apply in determining our earnings and profits for purposes of determining the portion of distributions taxable as dividend income. The application of these rules over time may result in a higher portion of distributions being taxed as dividends than would have occurred had we purchased the contributed assets entirely for cash. The characterization of any item of profit or loss (for example, as capital gain or loss rather than ordinary income or loss) which is allocated to us will be the same for us as it is for the Operating Partnership.

Treatment of Distributions and Constructive Distributions

Distributions we receive from the Operating Partnership will generally be nontaxable to us. However, we would have taxable income in the event the amount of distributions we receive from the Operating Partnership, or the amount of any decrease in our share of the Operating Partnership’s indebtedness (any such decrease being considered a constructive cash distribution to us), exceeds our adjusted tax basis in our interest in the Operating Partnership. Such taxable income would normally be characterized as a capital gain, and if our interest in the Operating Partnership has been held for longer than one year, any such gain would constitute long-term capital gain.

In addition, distributions received from the Operating Partnership could also be taxable in the following cases:

• If the distributions are made in redemption of part or all of a partner’s interest in the Operating Partnership, the partner may recognize ordinary income under Section 751 of the Code. Such ordinary income would generally equal the amount of ordinary income (if any) that would have been allocated to the partner in respect of the redeemed interest if the Operating Partnership had sold all of its assets.

• If a partner contributes appreciated property to the Operating Partnership and the Operating Partnership makes distributions, other than distributions of such partner’s share of operating income, to such partner within two years of such property contribution, part or all of such distributions may be treated as taxable sales proceeds to such partner.

Tax Basis in Our Operating Partnership Interest

Our adjusted tax basis in our interest in the Operating Partnership generally:

• will be equal to the amount of cash and the basis of any other property contributed to the Operating Partnership by us and our proportionate share of the Operating Partnership’s indebtedness;

• will be increased by our share of the Operating Partnership’s taxable and non-taxable income and any increase in our share of Operating Partnership indebtedness; and

• will be decreased (but not below zero) by the distributions we receive, our share of deductible and non-deductible losses and expenses of the Operating Partnership and any decrease in our share of Operating Partnership indebtedness.

Recently Enacted Legislation

On July 30, 2008, the American Housing Rescue and Foreclosure Prevention Act of 2008 (the “Housing Act”) was enacted. The following is a brief summary of certain provisions of the Housing Act.

• Prior to the Housing Act, foreign currency exchange gain was not explicitly included or excluded from the statutory definitions of qualifying income for purposes of the 95% and 75% income tests. The Housing Act provides that most real estate-related foreign currency gain recognized after July 30, 2008 is excluded from the computation of the income tests (i.e., such gain is excluded from the numerator and the denominator of the income test computations). However, foreign currency gain is treated as non-qualifying income if it is derived from substantial and regular trading or dealing in securities. These rules depart from previously issued IRS guidance that generally treated foreign currency gains as qualifying income under the 95% and 75% income tests to the extent such gains were attributable to assets producing qualifying income. Certain conforming changes have also been made to the asset tests, foreclosu re property and prohibited transaction provisions of the Code. See “Material Tax Considerations — Operational Requirements — Gross Income Tests” and “— Asset Tests” and “Material Tax Considerations — Taxation as a REIT.”

171

• The Housing Act expands the scope of the hedging exception by providing that the income tests will exclude any income from a hedging transaction entered into by the REIT after July 30, 2008 primarily to manage the risk of (1) interest rate changes with respect to borrowings made or to be made to acquire or carry real estate assets or (2) currency fluctuations with respect to an item of qualifying income under the 95% or 75% income test. Prior to the enactment of the Housing Act, income from a hedging transaction was treated as nonqualifying income for purposes of the 75% income test, and the income from hedging transactions described under number (1) above was only excluded from the 95% income test. See “Material Tax Considerations — Operational Requirements — Gross Income Tests.”

• Under prior law, sales of property by a REIT were not treated as prohibited transactions if such sales came within certain safe harbors. Certain provisions of the Housing Act make it easier for a REIT to fit within these safe harbor provisions, including a reduction in the current four year safe harbor holding period to two years for sales occurring after July 30, 2008. See “Material Tax Considerations — Taxation as a REIT.”

• Previously, not more than 20% of a REIT’s total assets could be represented by securities of one or more of the REIT’s taxable REIT subsidiaries. The Housing Act amends this rule by increasing the limitation to 25%. This change is effective for our taxable years beginning after December 31, 2008. See “Material Tax Considerations — Operational Requirements — Asset Tests.”

The foregoing is not an exhaustive list of changes made by the Housing Act. You are urged to consult your tax advisors regarding the specific tax consequences to you of the changes resulting from the enactment of Housing Act.

172

ERISA CONSIDERATIONS

ERISA Considerations for an Initial Investment

The following is a summary of material considerations arising under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), and the prohibited transaction provisions of Section 4975 of the Code that may be relevant to prospective investors. This discussion does not purport to deal with all aspects of ERISA or the Code that may be relevant to particular investors in light of their particular circumstances.

A prospective investor that is an employee benefit plan subject to ERISA, a tax-qualified retirement plan, an IRA, or a governmental, church, or other benefit plan that is exempt form ERISA (each, a “Plan”) is advised to consult its own legal advisor regarding the specific considerations arising under applicable provisions of ERISA, the Code, and state law with respect to the purchase, ownership, or sale of the shares by such plan or IRA.

A fiduciary of a Plan subject to ERISA should consider the fiduciary standards under ERISA in the context of the Plan’s particular circumstances before authorizing an investment of a portion of such Plan’s assets in our common shares. In particular, the fiduciary should consider:

• whether the investment satisfies the diversification requirements of Section 404(a)(1)(C) of ERISA;

• whether the investment is in accordance with the documents and instruments governing the Plan as required by Section 404(a)(1)(D) of ERISA;

• whether the investment is for the exclusive purpose of providing benefits to participants in the Plan and their beneficiaries, or defraying reasonable administrative expenses of the Plan; and

• whether the investment is prudent under ERISA.

173

In addition to the general fiduciary standards of investment prudence and diversification, specific provisions of ERISA and the Code prohibit a wide range of transactions involving the assets of a Plan and transactions with persons who have specified relationships to the Plan. Such persons are referred to as “parties in interest” in ERISA and as “disqualified persons” in the Code. Thus, a fiduciary of a Plan considering an investment in our common shares should also consider whether acquiring or continuing to hold our common shares, either directly or indirectly, might constitute a prohibited transaction. An excise tax may be imposed on any party in interest or disqualified person who participates in a prohibited transaction. The tax exempt status of an IRA will be lost if the IRA enters into a prohibited transa ction.

Each fiduciary of an investing Plan must independently determine whether such investment constitutes a prohibited transaction with respect to that Plan. The prohibited transaction rules of ERISA and the Code apply to transactions with a Plan and also to transactions with the “plan assets” of the Plan. Section 3(42) of ERISA generally provides that “plan assets” means plan assets as defined in regulations issued by the Department of Labor. Under these regulations, if a Plan acquires an equity interest that is neither a “publicly- offered security” nor a security issued by an investment company registered under the Investment Company Act, then for purposes of the fiduciary responsibility and prohibited transaction provisions under ERISA and the Code, the assets of the Plan would include both the e quity interest and an undivided interest in each of the entity’s underlying assets, unless an exemption applies.

These regulations define a publicly-offered security as a security that is “widely held,” “freely transferable,” and either part of a class of securities registered under Section 12(b) or 12(g) of the Exchange Act, or sold pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act, provided the securities are registered under the Exchange Act within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year of the issuer during which the offering occurred. The shares are being sold in an offering registered under the Securities Act, and will be registered within the relevant time provided under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act.

The regulations also provide that a security is “widely held” only if it is part of a class of securities that is owned by 100 or more investors independent of the issuer and of one another. The regulations further provide that whether a security is “freely transferable” is a factual question to be determined on the basis of all relevant facts and circumstances. The regulations also provide that when a security is part of an offering in which the minimum investment is $10,000 or less, as is the case with this offering, the existence of certain restrictions on transferability intended to prohibit transfers which would result in a termination or reclassification of the entity for state or federal tax purposes will not ordinarily affect the determination that such securities are freely transferable.

Our shares are subject to certain restrictions on transferability intended to ensure that we continue to qualify for federal income tax treatment as a REIT. We believe that the restrictions imposed under our charter and bylaws on the transfer of common shares are limited to the restrictions on transfer generally permitted under these regulations, and are not likely to result in the failure of the common shares to be “freely transferable.”

We believe our common shares are “widely held” and “freely transferable” as described above and, accordingly, that the common shares offered hereby should be deemed to be publicly-offered securities for the purposes of the Department of Labor regulations and that our assets should not be deemed to be “plan assets” of any Plan that invests in our common shares. Nonetheless, we cannot assure you that the Department of Labor and/or the U.S. Treasury Department could not reach a contrary conclusion.

Annual Valuations

A fiduciary of an employee benefit plan subject to ERISA is required to determine annually the fair market value of each asset of the plan as of the end of the plan’s fiscal year and to file a report reflecting that value with the Department of Labor. When the fair market value of any particular asset is not available, the fiduciary is required to make a good faith determination of that asset’s fair market value assuming an orderly liquidation at the time the determination is made. In addition, a trustee or custodian of an IRA must provide an IRA participant with a statement of the value of the IRA each year. In discharging its obligation to value assets of a plan, a fiduciary subject to ERISA must act consistently with the relevant provisions of the plan and the general fiduciary standards of ERISA.

174

Unless and until our shares are listed on a national securities exchange or are included for quotation on a national securities market, it is not expected that a public market for the shares will develop. To date, neither the Internal Revenue Service nor the Department of Labor has promulgated regulations specifying how a plan fiduciary should determine the fair market value of common shares in a corporation in circumstances where the fair market value of the shares is not determined in the marketplace. Therefore, to assist fiduciaries in fulfilling their valuation and annual reporting responsibilities with respect to ownership of our common shares, we intend to include estimated values of our shares in our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, along with the method used to establish such values, and the date of any data used to develop th e estimated values. Such estimated valuations are not intended to represent the amount you would receive if our assets were sold and the proceeds distributed to you in a liquidation of Hines REIT, or the amount you would receive if you attempt to sell your shares. There is no public market for our shares, and any sale of our shares would likely be at a substantial discount.

We caution you that our valuations will be estimates only and may be based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that may not be accurate or complete. We are not required to obtain appraisals for our assets or third-party valuations or opinions for the specific purpose of preparing these estimates. Our estimated valuations should not be viewed as an accurate reflection of the fair market value of our assets, nor will they represent the amount of net proceeds that would result from an immediate sale of our assets or upon liquidation. In addition, real estate and other asset values could decline. As set forth above, there is no public market for our shares, and it is unlikely that our shareholders could realize these values if they were to attempt to sell their shares. One method that we have used in the past, and may use again in t he future, is to deem the estimated value of our shares to be equal the price at which we are then offering our shares to the public. Such a method would be subject to the limitations on valuation described above. Additionally, in the event we were to use such a method to establish a value for our shares, that value would likely be higher than the amount you would receive if our assets were sold and the proceeds distributed to you in a liquidation of Hines REIT since the amount of funds available for investment in our assets is reduced by the amount of proceeds we use for other purposes, including certain up-front commissions, fees and expenses. Please see “Estimated Use of Proceeds.” For these reasons, our estimated valuations should not be utilized for any purpose other than to assist plan fiduciaries and IRA custodians in fulfilling their annual valuation and reporting responsibilities. Further, we cannot assure you that the estimated values, or the method used to establish such values, will c omply with the ERISA or IRA requirements described above.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

As of March 31, 2009, we were not subject to any material pending legal proceedings other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to our business.

REPORTS TO SHAREHOLDERS

We will make available to each shareholder an annual report within 120 days following the close of each fiscal year. These annual reports will contain, among other things, the following:

• financial statements, including a balance sheet, statement of operations, statement of shareholders’ equity, and statement of cash flows, prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which are audited and reported on by our independent registered public accounting firm; and

• full disclosure of all material terms, factors and circumstances surrounding any and all transactions involving us and any of our directors, their affiliates, the Advisor or any other affiliate of Hines occurring in the year for which the annual report is made.

175

We are required by the Exchange Act to file quarterly reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 10-Q and we will furnish or make available to our shareholders a summary of the information contained in each such report within 60 days after the end of each applicable quarter. This summary information generally will include balance sheets, a statement of income, and a statement of cash flows, and any other pertinent information regarding the Company and its activities during the quarter. Shareholders also may receive a copy of any Form 10-Q upon request to the Company. If we are ever not subject to this filing requirement, we will still furnish or make available to our shareholders a quarterly report within 60 days after each of the first three quarters containing similar information. We also provide quarterly dividend statements.

We will make available to you through our web site at www.HinesREIT.com our quarterly and annual reports and any other reports required to be made available to you.

Our tax accountants, Ernst & Young LLP, will prepare our federal tax return (and any applicable state income tax returns). We will provide appropriate tax information to our shareholders within 30 days following the end of each fiscal year. Our fiscal year is the same as the calendar year.

SUPPLEMENTAL SALES MATERIAL

In addition to this prospectus, we may use certain sales material in connection with the offering of the shares. However, such sales material will only be used when accompanied by or preceded by the delivery of this prospectus. In certain jurisdictions, some or all of such sales material may not be available. This material may include information relating to this offering, the past performance of the programs managed by Hines and its affiliates, property brochures and publications concerning real estate and investments.

The following is a brief description of the supplemental sales material prepared by us for use in permitted jurisdictions:

• The Hines Real Estate Investment Trust Property Gallery, which briefly summarizes (i) information about risks and suitability investors should consider before investing in us; (ii) objectives and strategies relating to our selection of assets; and (iii) certain properties in which we own a direct or indirect interest.

• The Hines Real Estate Investment Trust Brochure, which briefly summarizes (i) information about risks and suitability investors should consider before investing in us; (ii) general information about investing in real estate; and (iii) information about Hines Real Estate Investment Trust and its sponsor, Hines.

• Certain print brochures and handouts, which include (i) information about risks and suitability investors should consider before investing in us; (ii) various topics related to real estate; and (iii) information regarding certain properties in which we own a direct or indirect interest, in some cases.

• Certain information on our website, electronic media, presentations and third party articles.

The offering of our common shares is made only by means of this prospectus. Although the information contained in such sales material will not conflict with any of the information contained in this prospectus, such material does not purport to be complete and should not be considered a part of this prospectus or the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part. Further, such additional material should not be considered as being incorporated by reference in this prospectus or the registration statement forming the basis of the offering of the shares of which this prospectus is a part.

LEGAL OPINIONS

The legality of the common shares being offered hereby has been passed upon for Hines REIT by Venable LLP. The statements under the caption “Material Tax Considerations” as they relate to federal income tax matters have been reviewed by Greenberg Traurig, LLP, and Greenberg Traurig, LLP has opined as to certain income tax matters relating to an investment in the common shares. Greenberg Traurig, LLP has represented Hines and other of our affiliates in other matters and may continue to do so in the future. Please see “Conflicts of Interest — Lack of Separate Representation.”

176

EXPERTS

The consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008, and the consolidated financial statements of Hines US Core Office Fund LP and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008, incorporated in this Prospectus by reference from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their reports, which are incorporated herein by reference, and have been so incorporated in reliance u pon the reports of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.

The statements of revenues and certain operating expenses of the two-building office complex located at 2200, 2222 and 2230 East Imperial Highway, El Segundo, California, 2555 Grand, Kansas City, Missouri, and 2800 Post Oak Boulevard, Houston, Texas for the year ended December 31, 2007, incorporated in this Prospectus by reference from the Company’s Current Reports on Form 8-K/A have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent auditors, as stated in their reports, which are incorporated herein by reference (which reports on the statements of revenues and certain operating expenses express unqualified opinions and include explanatory paragraphs referring to the purpose of the statements) and are so incorporated in reliance upon the reports of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting a nd auditing.

PRIVACY POLICY NOTICE

To help you understand how we protect your personal information, we have included our Privacy Policy as Appendix C to this prospectus. This appendix describes our current privacy policy and practices. Should you decide to establish or continue a shareholder relationship with us, we will advise you of our policy and practices at least once annually, as required by law.

INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

The following filings are hereby incorporated by reference:

• Current report on Form 8-K/A, filed May 14, 2008 (includes financial statements for The Raytheon/DirecTV Buildings, El Segundo, California)

• Current report on Form 8-K/A, filed May 14, 2008 (includes financial statements for 2555 Grand, Kansas City, Missouri)

• Current report on Form 8-K/A, filed June 6, 2008 (includes financial statements for Williams Tower, Houston, Texas)

• Current report on Form 8-K, filed April 15, 2009 (includes pro forma consolidated financial statements for Hines REIT)

• our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed March 31, 2009;

• our Current Reports on Form 8-K, filed on January 22, 2009, January 23, 2009 and April 27, 2009 (not including any information furnished under Items 2.02, 7.01 or 9.01 of Form 8-K, which information is not incorporated by reference herein); and

• our Definitive Proxy Statement in respect of our 2009 meeting of the shareholders.

We will provide to each person, including any beneficial owner, to whom a prospectus has been delivered, a copy of any or all of the reports or documents that have been incorporated by reference in this prospectus contained in the registration statement but not delivered with this prospectus upon written or oral request, at no cost to the requester. Requests for such reports or documents must be made to Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., 2800 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 5000, Houston, Texas 77056-6118. Our telephone number is 1-888-220-6121. Such documents may also be accessed on our website at www.HinesREIT.com or directly at http: //hinesreit.myhines.com/reit/map/investorRelations/secFilings.jsp.

177

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

We have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in Washington, D.C., a registration statement on Form S-11 with respect to the shares offered pursuant to this prospectus. For further information regarding us and the common shares offered by this prospectus, you may review the full registration statement, including its exhibits and schedules, filed under the Securities Act. The registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, including its exhibits and schedules, may be inspected and copied at the public reference room maintained by the Securities and Exchange Commission at 100 F Street, N.E. Room 1580, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. Copies of the materials may also be obtained from the Securities and Exchange Commission at prescribed rates by writing to the public reference room main tained by the Securities and Exchange Commission at 100 F Street, N.E. Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of this public reference room by calling the Securities and Exchange Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330.

The Securities and Exchange Commission maintains a World Wide Web site on the Internet at www.sec.gov. Our registration statement, of which this prospectus constitutes a part, can be downloaded from the Securities and Exchange Commission’s web site.

We maintain a website at www.HinesREIT.com where there is additional information about our business, but the contents of that site are not incorporated by reference in or otherwise a part of this prospectus.

178

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

Advisor:  means Hines Advisors Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership.

Capmark:  means Capmark Finance, Inc.

Code:  means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the regulations promulgated thereunder.

Company:  means, collectively, Hines REIT and the Operating Partnership and their direct and indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries.

Core Fund:  means Hines US Core Office Fund LP, a Delaware limited partnership.

Dealer Manager:  means Hines Real Estate Investments, Inc. (formerly known as Hines Real Estate Securities, Inc.), a Delaware corporation, also referred to as “HREI”.

ERISA:  means the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.

Excess Securities:  means shares proposed to be transferred pursuant to a transfer which, if consummated, would violate the restrictions on transfer contained within our charter.

Exchange Act:  means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

FINRA:  means the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.

Fund Investors:  means partners in the Core Fund and certain other investors in entities in which the Core Fund has an interest.

Hines:  means Hines Interests Limited Partnership, a Texas limited partnership.

Hines Global:  means Hines Global REIT, Inc., a Maryland corporation.

Hines REIT:  means Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation.

Hines Value Added Fund:  means Hines U.S. Office Value Added Fund II, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership.

HREH:  means Hines Real Estate Holdings limited partnership, a Texas limited partnership.

HREI:  means Hines Real Estate Investments, Inc., also referred to as the “Dealer Manager.”

HSH Facility:  means the secured credit facility with HSH Nordbank AG, New York Branch.

HSH Nordbank:  means HSH Nordbank AG, New York Branch.

Institutional Co-Investors:  means the independent pension plans and funds that are advised by the Institutional Co-Investor Advisor and co-invest in properties with the Core Fund.

Institutional Co-Investor Advisor:  means Promark Investment Advisors Inc.

IRA:  means an individual retirement account established pursuant to Section 408 or Section 408A of the Code.

Investment Company Act:  means the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended.

KeyBank:  means KeyBank National Association.

NOP:  means National Office Partners Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership.

OP Units:  means partner interests in the Operating Partnership.

Operating Partnership:  means Hines REIT Properties, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership.

Participation Interest:  means the profits interest in the Operating Partnership held by HALP Associates Limited Partnership.

179

Partnership Agreement:  means the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Hines REIT Properties, L.P.

Plan:  means a pension, profit-sharing, retirement employee benefit plan, individual retirement account or Keogh Plan.

REIT:  means an entity that qualifies as a real estate investment trust for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

SAB:  means a Staff Accounting Bulletin of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Securities Act:  means the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Shell Buildings:  means, collectively, One Shell Plaza located in Houston, Texas, at 910 Louisiana Street and Two Shell Plaza, located in Houston, Texas, at 777 Walker Street.

UBTI:  means unrelated business taxable income, as that term is defined in Sections 511 through 514 of the Code.

UPREIT:  means an umbrella partnership real estate investment trust.

U.S. GAAP:  means accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

180

FINANCIAL STATEMENT

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.
Consolidated Financial Statements — For the Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	*
Consolidated Balance Sheets	*
Consolidated Statements of Operations	*
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity	*
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	*
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	*
Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. —
Schedules — December 31, 2008
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	*
Schedule II-Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Schedule III-Real Estate Assets and Accumulated Depreciation	*
Hines US Core Office Fund LP
Consolidated Financial Statements — For the Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	*
Consolidated Balance Sheets	*
Consolidated Statements of Operations	*
Consolidated Statements of Partners’ Equity	*
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	*
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	*
Williams Tower, Houston, Texas — For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 (Unaudited) and For the Year Ended December 31, 2007:
Independent Auditors’ Report	*
Statements of Revenues and Certain Operating Expenses	*
Notes to Statements of Revenues and Certain Operating Expenses	*
The Raytheon/DirecTV Buildings, El Segundo, California — For the Year Ended December 31, 2007:
Independent Auditors’ Report	*
Statement of Revenues and Certain Operating Expenses	*
Notes to Statement of Revenues and Certain Operating Expenses	*
2555 Grand, Kansas City, Missouri — For the Year Ended December 31, 2007:
Independent Auditors’ Report	*
Statement of Revenue and Certain Operating Expenses	*
Notes to Statement of Revenue and Certain Operating Expenses	*
Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.
Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Statements
Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Statements — Basis of Presentation	*
Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2008	*
Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of Operations For the Year Ended December 31, 2008	*
Unaudited Notes to Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Statements	*

____________

* See the “Incorporation by Reference” section of this prospectus.

F-1

APPENDIX A

 

A-1

A-2

 

A-3

A-4

APPENDIX B

HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.

DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT PLAN

(As of January 26, 2009)

Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., a Maryland Corporation (the “Company”), has adopted the following Dividend Reinvestment Plan (the “DRP”). Capitalized terms shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Company’s charter (the “Charter”) unless otherwise defined herein.

1. Dividend Reinvestment.  As an agent for the shareholders (“Shareholders”) of the Company who purchase shares of the Company’s shares of common stock (the “Shares”) pursuant to an offering by the Company (“Offering”), and who elect to participate in the DRP (the “Participants”), the Company will apply all dividends and other distributions authorized and paid in respect of the Shares held by each Participant, but exclusive of distributions made to Shareholders attributable to the net proceeds from the sale of the Company’s properties (“Dividends”), including Dividends paid with respect to any full or fractional Shares acquired under the DRP, to the purchase of the Shares for such Participants directly, if permitted under state securities laws and, if not, through the Dealer Manager or Soliciting Dealers registered in the Participant’s state of residence.

2. Effective Date.  The effective date of the most recent amendment to this DRP was January 26, 2009.

3. Procedure for Participation.  Any Shareholder who owns Shares and who has received a prospectus, as contained in a Company’s Registration Statement filed with the Commission, may elect to become a Participant by completing and executing a subscription agreement, an enrollment form or any other appropriate authorization form as may be available from the Company from time to time. Participation in the DRP will begin with the next Dividend payable after receipt of a Participant’s subscription, enrollment or authorization. Shares will be purchased under the DRP on the date that Dividends are paid by the Company. Each Participant agrees that if, at any time prior to the listing of the Shares on a national securities exchange or inclusion of the Shares for quotation on a national securities market he or she fails to meet the suitability requirements for making an investment in the Company or cannot make the other representations or warranties set forth in the subscription agreement or other applicable enrollment form, he or she will promptly so notify the Company in writing.

Participation in the DRP shall continue until such participation is terminated in writing by the Participant pursuant to Section 8 below. If the DRP transaction involves Shares which are registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) in a future registration or the Board of Directors elects to change the purchase price to be paid for Shares issued pursuant to the DRP, the Company shall make available to all Participants the prospectus as contained in the Company’s registration statement filed with the Commission with respect to such future registration or provide public notification to all Participants of such change in the purchase price of Shares issued pursuant to the DRP. If, after a price change, a Participant does not desire to continue to participate in the DRP, he should exercis e his right to terminate his participation pursuant to the provisions of Section 8 below.

4. Purchase of Shares.  Beginning with distributions scheduled to be paid for the first quarter of 2009, participants will acquire DRP Shares from the Company at a fixed price of $9.58 per share until (i) all DRP Shares registered in the Offering are issued, (ii) the Offering terminates and the Company elects to deregister with the Commission the unsold DRP Shares, or (iii) the Board of Directors of the Company decides to change the purchase price for DRP Shares or terminate the DRP for any reason. Participants in the DRP may also purchase fractional Shares so that 100% of the Dividends will be used to acquire Shares. However, a Participant will not be able to acquire DRP Shares to the extent that any such purchase would cause such Participant to vio late any provision in the Charter.

Shares to be distributed by the Company in connection with the DRP may (but are not required to) be supplied from: (a) the DRP Shares which are being registered with the Commission in connection with the Offering, (b) Shares to be registered with the Commission after the Offering for use in the DRP (a “Future Registration”), or (c) Shares of the Company’s common stock purchased by the Company for the DRP in a secondary market (if available) or on a securities exchange or national securities market (if listed) (collectively, the “Secondary Market”). Shares purchased on the Secondary Market as set forth in (c) above will be purchased at the then-prevailing market price, which price will be utilized for purposes of purchases of Shares in the DRP. Shares acquired by the Company on the Secon dary Market or will have a price per share equal to the then-prevailing market price, which shall equal the price on the securities exchange, national securities market or over-the-counter market on which such shares are listed at the date of purchase if such shares are then listed. If Shares are not so listed, the Board of Directors of the Company will determine the price at which Shares will be issued under the DRP.

B-1

If the Company acquires Shares in the Secondary Market for use in the DRP, the Company shall use reasonable efforts to acquire Shares for use in the DRP at the lowest price then reasonably available. However, the Company does not in any respect guarantee or warrant that the Shares so acquired and purchased by the Participant in the DRP will be at the lowest possible price. Further, irrespective of the Company’s ability to acquire Shares in the Secondary Market or to complete a Future Registration for Shares to be used in the DRP, the Company is in no way obligated to do either, in its sole discretion.

5. Shares Certificates.  The ownership of the Shares purchased through the DRP will be in book-entry form only.

6. Reports.  Within 90 days after the end of the Company’s fiscal year, the Company shall provide each Shareholder with an individualized report on his or her investment, including the purchase date(s), purchase price and number of Shares owned, as well as the dates of Dividend distributions and amounts of Dividends paid during the prior fiscal year. In addition, the Company shall provide to each Participant an individualized quarterly report at the time of each Dividend payment showing the number of Shares owned prior to the current Dividend, the amount of the current Dividend and the number of Shares owned after the current Dividend.

7. Commissions.  The Company will not pay any selling commissions or Dealer Manager fees in connection with Shares sold pursuant to the DRP.

8. Termination by Participant.  A Participant may terminate participation in the DRP at any time, without penalty by delivering to the Company a written notice of such termination. Any such withdrawal will be effective only with respect to dividends paid more than 30 days after receipt of such written notice. Prior to listing of the Shares on a national securities exchange or inclusion of the shares for quotation on a national securities market, any transfer of Shares by a Participant to a non-Participant will terminate participation in the DRP with respect to the transferred Shares. Upon termination of DRP participation, future Dividends, if any, will be distributed to the Shareholder in cash.

9. Taxation of Distributions.  The reinvestment of Dividends in the DRP does not relieve Participants of any taxes which may be payable as a result of those Dividends and their reinvestment in Shares pursuant to the terms of the DRP.

10. Amendment or Termination of DRP by the Company.  The Board of Directors of the Company may by majority vote amend or terminate the DRP for any reason upon 10 days’ notice to the Participants.

11. Liability of the Company.  The Company shall not be liable for any act done in good faith, or for any good faith omission to act, including, without limitation, any claims or liability: (a) arising out of failure to terminate a Participant’s account upon such Participant’s death prior to receipt of notice in writing of such death; and (b) with respect to the time and the prices at which Shares are purchased or sold for Participant’s account.

B-2

APPENDIX C

HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.

HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS INC.

PRIVACY POLICY

OUR COMMITMENT TO PROTECTING YOUR PRIVACY.  We consider customer privacy to be fundamental to our relationship with our shareholders. In the course of servicing your account, we collect personal information about you (“Nonpublic Personal Information”). We are committed to maintaining the confidentiality, integrity and security of our shareholders’ personal information. It is our policy to respect the privacy of our current and former shareholders and to protect the personal information entrusted to us. This privacy policy (this “Privacy Policy”) describes the standards we follow for handling your personal information and how we use the information we collect about you.

1.  Information We May Collect.

We may collect Nonpublic Personal Information about you from the following sources:

• Information on applications, subscription agreements or other forms which may include your name, address, e-mail address, telephone number, tax identification number, date of birth, marital status, driver’s license number, citizenship, assets, income, employment history, beneficiary information, personal bank account information, broker/dealer, financial advisor, IRA custodian, account joint owners and similar parties;

• Information about your transactions with us, our affiliates and others, such as the types of products you purchase, your account balances and transactional history; and

• Information obtained from others, such as from consumer credit reporting agencies which may include information about your creditworthiness, debts, financial circumstances and credit history, including any bankruptcies and foreclosures.

2.  Why We Collect Nonpublic Personal Information.

We collect information from and about you:

• in order to identify you as a customer;

• in order to establish and maintain your customer accounts;

• in order to complete your customer transactions;

• in order to market investment products or services that may meet your particular financial and investing circumstances;

• in order to communicate and share information with your broker/dealer, financial advisor, IRA custodian, joint owners and other similar parties acting at your request and on your behalf; and

• in order to meet our obligations under the laws and regulations that govern us.

3.  Use and Disclosure of Information.

We may disclose all of the Nonpublic Personal Information we collect about you as described above to the following types of third parties:

• Our Affiliated Companies.  We may offer investment products and services through certain of our affiliated companies, and we may share all of the Nonpublic Personal Information we collect on you with such affiliates. We believe that by sharing information about you and your accounts among our companies, we are better able to serve your investment needs and to suggest services or educational materials that may be of interest to you. You may limit the information we share with our affiliate companies as described at the end of this notice below.

C-1

• Nonaffiliated Financial Service Providers and Joint Marketing Partners.  From time to time, we use outside companies to perform services for us or functions on our behalf , including marketing of our own investment products and services or marketing products or services that we may offer jointly with other financial institutions. We may disclose all of the Nonpublic Personal Information we collect as described above to such companies. However, before we disclose Nonpublic Personal Information to any of our service providers or joint marketing partners, we require them to agree to keep your Nonpublic Personal Information confidential and secure and to use it only as authorized by us.

• Other Nonaffiliated Third Parties.  We do not sell or share your Nonpublic Personal Information with nonaffiliated outside marketers, for example, retail department stores, grocery stores or discount merchandise chains, who may want to offer you their own products and services. However, we may also use and disclose all of the Nonpublic Personal Information we collect about you to the extent permitted by law. For example, to:

• correct technical problems and malfunctions in how we provide our products and services to you and to technically process your information;

•      protect the security and integrity of our records, Web Site and customer service center;

•      protect our rights and property and the rights and property of others;

•      take precautions against liability;

•      respond to claims that your information violates the rights and interests of third parties;

•      take actions required by law or to respond to judicial process;

•      assist with detection, investigation or reporting of actual or potential fraud, misrepresentation or criminal activity; and

• provide personal information to law enforcement agencies or for an investigation on a matter related to public safety to the extent permitted under other provisions of law.

4.  Protecting Your Information.

Our employees are required to follow the procedures we have developed to protect the integrity of your information. These procedures include:

• Restricting physical and other access to your Nonpublic Personal Information to persons with a legitimate business need to know the information in order to service your account;

• Contractually obligating third parties doing business with us to keep your Nonpublic Personal Information confidential and secure and to use it only as authorized by us;

• Providing information to you only after we have used reasonable efforts to assure ourselves of your identity by asking for and receiving from you information only you should know; and

• Maintaining reasonably adequate physical, electronic and procedural safeguards to protect your information.

5.  Former Customers.

We treat information concerning our former customers the same way we treat information about our current customers.

C-2

6.  Keeping You Informed.

We will provide notice of our Privacy Policy annually, as long as you maintain an ongoing relationship with us. If we decide to change our Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our Web Site so our users and customers are always aware of what information we collect, use and disclose. If at any point we decide to use or disclose your Nonpublic Personal Information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify you in writing, which may or may not be by e-mail. If you object to the change to our Privacy Policy, then you must contact us using the information provided in the notice. We will otherwise use and disclose a user’s or a customer’s Nonpublic Personal Information in accordance with the Privacy Policy that was in effect when such information was collected.

7.  Questions About Our Privacy Policy.

If you have any questions about our Privacy Policy, please contact us via telephone at 888.220.6121 or email at HinesREITprivacy@Hines.com.

8.  Your Right to Limit our Information Sharing with Affiliates

This Privacy Policy applies to Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and Hines Real Estate Investments, Inc. Federal law gives you the right to limit some but not all marketing from our affiliates. Federal law also requires us to give you this notice to tell you about your choice to limit marketing from our affiliates. You may tell us not to share information about your creditworthiness with our affiliated companies, except where such affiliate is performing services for us. We may still share with them other information about your experiences with us. You may limit our affiliates in the Hines group of companies, such as our securities affiliates from marketing their products or services to you based on your personal information that we collect and share with them. This information includes you account and investment history with us and your credit score.

If you want to limit our sharing of your information with our affiliates, you may contact us:

By telephone at: 888.220.6121

By mail: Mark your choices below, fill in and send to:

HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS, INC.

2800 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 4700

Houston, TX 77056

  ��  Do not share information about my creditworthiness with your affiliates for their everyday business purposes.

Do not allow your affiliates to use my personal information to market to me.

Name: _____________________

Signature: __________________

Your choice to limit marketing offers from our affiliates will apply for at least 5 years from when you tell us your choice. Once that period expires, you will receive a renewal notice that will allow you to continue to limit marketing offers from our affiliates for at least another 5 years. If you have already made a choice to limit marketing offers from our affiliates, you do not need to act again until you receive a renewal notice. If you have not already made a choice, unless we hear from you, we can begin sharing your information 30 days from the date we sent you this notice. However, you can contact us at any time to limit our sharing as set forth above.

Residents of some states may have additional privacy rights. We adhere to all applicable state laws.

C-3

APPENDIX D

HINES HISTORY, EXPERIENCE AND TIMELINE

Hines, our sponsor, has over 50 years of experience. This timeline briefly summarizes this history. Our Advisor relies on Hines to locate, evaluate and assist in the acquisition of our real estate investments and to perform many of our day-to-day operations. Hines also manages all of our direct and indirect real estate investments. The Core Fund relies on Hines in a similar manner. Please see “Management — Hines and Our Property Management and Leasing Agreements — The Hines Organization.”

Except for the Core Fund and any properties identified in the prospectus, we do not have an interest in any of the funds, properties or projects listed below. This summary is included to provide potential investors with additional historical information about our sponsor. See “Risk Factors — Business and Real Estate Risks — We are different in some respects from prior programs sponsored by Hines, and therefore the past performance of such programs may not be indicative of our future results.” Hines’ past performance may not be indicative of our future results. In addition, certain other programs sponsored by Hines have experienced declines in the appraisal value of their assets and net asset values of their funds.

Please see “Investment Objectives and Policies With Respect to Certain Activities” for a description of our investment objectives and policies, which differ from some of the current and historical projects sponsored by Hines. For example, Hines’ previous programs and investments were conducted through privately held entities not subject to the up-front commissions, fees and expenses associated with this offering or all of the laws and regulations to which we are subject to; and a significant portion of the prior programs, financial results and history of Hines involve development projects. We do not currently expect to undertake significant development projects.

For the 10-years ended December 31, 2008, Hines sponsored 27 privately offered programs in which Hines co-invested with various institutional and other third-party investors, and one publicly offered investment program. For these prior programs in this time period:

• Funds raised from investors: $15.1 billion

• Aggregate amount of real estate investments: $24.7 billion

• Number of properties: 240

• In the U.S., 125 properties with a cost of $15.1 billion

• Outside of the U.S., 115 properties with a cost of $9.6 billion

– 32.6% in Western Europe

– 0.4% in Canada

– 67.0% in emerging markets

• 96 dispositions with an aggregate cost basis of $6.6 billion and sales price of $8.3 billion

D-1

Summary of Hines closed investment programs*	U.S. or Non U.S.	Development (Dev) and Acquisition (Acq)
Programs in the investment phase
Hines India Fund	Non U.S.	Acq, Dev
Hines European Development Fund II, L.P.	Non U.S.	Dev
HCM Holdings II, LP (Mexico)	Non U.S.	Acq, Dev
HCB Interests II, LP (Brazil)	Non U.S.	Acq, Dev
Hines U.S. Office Value Added Fund II, L.P.	U.S.	Acq
Hines CalPERS Green Development Fund	U.S.	Dev
Hines International Real Estate Fund	Non U.S.	Dev, Acq
HCC Interests LP (China)	Non U.S.	Dev, Acq
HCS Interest LP (Sunbelt Spain)	Non U.S.	Dev, Acq
National Office Partners	U.S.	Acq, Dev
Programs in the operations/dispositions phase
Hines European Value Added Fund	Non U.S.	Dev, Acq
HCB Interests, LP (Brazil)	Non U.S.	Dev, Acq
HCM Holdings LP (Mexico)	Non U.S.	Dev, Acq
Hines U.S. Office Value Added Fund I	U.S.	Acq
Hines European Development Fund	Non U.S.	Dev
Emerging Markets Real Estate Fund II	Non U.S.	Dev, Acq
Emerging Markets Real Estate Fund I	Non U.S.	Dev, Acq
Hines/GMIMCo Acquisitions	U.S.	Acq
Programs that have gone full cycle
Hines Suburban Office Venture	U.S.	Acq
Hines 1999 U.S. Office Development Fund	U.S.	Dev
National Office Partners (Initial Phase — pre 4/05)	U.S.	Acq, Dev
Hines Corporate Properties	U.S.	Dev, Acq
Hines 1997 U.S. Office Development Fund	U.S.	Dev
HMS Office	U.S.	Acq

____________

*  Certain of these programs have experienced adverse developments in the past.

The following is a list of Hines’ current U.S. and foreign institutional investor partners. These institutional investor partners have invested in other Hines programs, not in Hines REIT, and we have no expectation that these institutional partners will invest or partner with us.

• Caixa

• California Public Employees’ Retirement System

• Colorado Public Employees’ Retirement Association

• Deutsche Bank

• E. ON Energie AG

• Florida State Board of Administration

• General Motors Pension Trust

• Ideenkapital AG

• Illinois Teachers Retirement System

• MEAG (Munich Ergo Asset Management)

D-2

• New York State Teachers Retirement System

• Pennsylvania Public School Employees’ Retirement System

• Sparinvest S.A.

• Stichting Pensioenfonds ABP

• Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association

• Westdeutsche Immobilien Bank (West Immo)

Establishment Through Recognized Performance: The Late 50s, 60s & 70s

Originally a developer of warehouse and distribution buildings with some ancillary office space in the 1960s, Hines shifted its strategy during the 1970s from smaller industrial and office properties to large and distinctive office towers, anticipating corporate America’s interest in signature office buildings.

1957	—	Gerald D. Hines Interests founded as a sole proprietorship.
1958	—	After six office/warehouse projects, Hines completes the firm’s first Class A Office Project, 4219 Richmond Ave., Houston, Texas.
1967	—	Gerald D. Hines Interests celebrates its 10th anniversary with 97 office, warehouse, retail, parking and residential projects in its portfolio.
1971	—	Hines builds its first office tower in downtown Houston, the 50-story One Shell Plaza.
1973	—	Banking Division is formed to pursue development of bank headquarters in joint ventures outside Houston, starting national expansion of firm.
1975	—	Pennzoil Place is completed and named building of the year by the NY Times.
1976	—	Hines sells a major interest in Pennzoil Place to an international investor. Hines completes its first international development in Montreal.
1978	—	Construction of Three First National Plaza (Chicago) begins.
1979	—	The West Region office opens in San Francisco.

Equity Joint Ventures and Selective Recapitalization: The 80s

During the high interest rate environment of the 1980s, Hines structured development partnerships with providers of long term equity to capitalize larger and more complex development projects in central business districts.

1981	—	The East Region office opens in New York City.
1982	—	The Southeast Region office opens in Atlanta.
1983	—	Transco Tower, now called Williams Tower, and Republic Bank Center, now called Bank of America Center (both in Houston) are completed, as is United Bank Center, now Wells Fargo Center (Denver) is completed.
1984	—	580 California (San Francisco), Huntington Center (Columbus) and Southeast Financial Center, now Wachovia  Financial Center (Miami) are completed.
1985	—	Ravinia Center (Atlanta) is completed.
1986	—	53rd At Third and 31 West 52nd Street are completed (both in New York). The Midwest Region office opens in Chicago.
1987	—	Hines celebrates its 30th anniversary with 373 projects completed and 921 employees throughout the U.S. The Norwest Center (Minneapolis) and Columbia Square (Washington, D.C.) buildings are completed.
1988 — 1989	—	500 Bolyston (Boston) and Franklin Square (Washington, D.C.) are completed.

Global Expansion, Acquisitions and Investment Management: The 90s

In the early 1990s, Hines strategically decided to expand internationally, seeing an opportunity to provide quality space in overseas markets to multi-national firms. Domestically, as real estate markets softened in the early 90s, Hines saw an opportunity to buy buildings below replacement cost and purchased over 27 million square feet in existing properties during the decade.

D-3

In the late 90s, Hines formed a series of co-investment partnerships with major investors to execute a suburban office market development strategy.

1990	—	Jeffrey C. Hines appointed President of Hines Interests Limited Partnership; Gerald D. Hines becomes Chairman. 343 Sansome (San Francisco), 225 High Ridge Road (Stamford) and Figueroa at Wilshire (Los Angeles) are completed.
1991	—	The first international office opens in Berlin. 450 Lexington (New York) and One Detroit Center, now Comerica Tower (Detroit) are completed.
1992	—	Mexico City and Moscow offices open. The renovation and development of the historic Postal Square (Washington, D.C.) is completed.
1993	—	700 11th Street (Washington, D.C.) is acquired, the first building acquisition by Hines.
1994	—	Hines begins the year with 18 major developments in progress in the U.S. and three foreign countries. Greenspoint Plaza (Houston) is acquired. Del Bosque is completed in Mexico City and sold to Coca-Cola for its Latin America headquarters.
1995	—	Paris, London, Frankfurt and Prague offices are all opened. In partnership with Morgan Stanley, Hines acquires the Homart portfolio (15 U.S. office buildings).
1996	—	The Barcelona and Beijing offices open. Hines closes its first international fund, Emerging Markets Fund I.
1997	—	Hines celebrates its 40th anniversary with 2,700 employees worldwide. Warsaw office opens. Construction begins on Diagonal Mar in Barcelona, the largest European undertaking for Hines to date.
1998	—	Hines completes its first international property acquisition, Reforma 350 in Mexico City. Hines Corporate Properties (Hines’ first Build-to-Suit Fund) closes. Hines U.S. Development Fund I closes. CalPERS selects Hines as partner and investment manager for its $1.0 billion portfolio of 18 properties. Sào Paulo office opens.
1999	—	The Hines U.S. Office Development Fund II and Emerging Markets Real Estate Fund II close. Hines completes Mala Sarka (Prague), DZ Bank (Berlin), and Main Tower (Frankfurt). Hines acquires Figueroa at Wilshire (Los Angeles), 1100 Louisiana (Houston), and Bank of America Tower (Miami).

D-4

Continuing Development, Expanded Investment Vehicles: The 00s

2000	—	Hines starts major office projects in the central business districts of Seattle, Chicago, New York and San Francisco. Hines acquires 750 Seventh Avenue (New York).
2001	—	Hines develops, Gannett/USA Today headquarters in Virginia and projects for Morgan Stanley Dean Witter, Bear Stearns and Swiss Bank Corporation (now UBS Warburg) in New York.
2002	—	Hines initiates the Hines Suburban Office Venture to acquire suburban office properties. Hines completes 745 Seventh Avenue in New York City and the resort community of Aspen Highlands Village in Aspen, Colorado.
2003	—	Completed projects include Hilton Americas-Houston, Toyota Center and Calpine Center (all in Houston), 2002 Summit Boulevard (Atlanta), ABN AMRO (Chicago), Benrather Karree (Düsseldorf) and Panamérica Park (São Paulo).
		Hines expands its presence in Paris with three significant projects. Hines begins the urban planning project Garibaldi Repubblica (Milan), a master plan project which includes residential, office, retail and a hotel as well as a 26-acre public park. Additional residential projects include Tower I of Park Avenue (Beijing), River Valley Ranch (Colorado) and master-planned community Diagonal Mars Illa de Llac in Barcelona. The Hines European Development Fund is formed to focus on Class A office properties in Western Europe. The Hines U.S. Core Fund acquires its first buildings, three New York City office buildings and a building in Washington D.C. The Hines U.S. Office Value Added Fund offering is closed. Construction begins on One South Dearborn (Chicago), 2525 Ponce de Leon (Coral Gables), 1180 Peachtree (Atlanta) and Torre Almirante (R io de Janeiro).
2004	—	Hines sponsors its first public program, Hines REIT, which commences its first public offering. Development continues on Cannon Place, 99 Queen Victoria and the new world headquarters for the Salvation Army (all in London), and International Plaza-Kempinski Hotel (São Paulo).
2005	—	Hines continues to seek out new development and investment opportunities in over 100 markets around the world.
		Hines and CalPERS create funds to invest in Mexico’s real estate market and Brazil’s office, industrial and residential markets.
		Properties in development include 300 North LaSalle and One South Dearborn in Chicago and 900 de Maisonneuve, (Montreal).
2006	—	Hines and CalPERS establish the nation’s first real estate investment fund devoted solely to sustainable development. Hines is honored with the Environmental Protection Agency’s ENERGY STAR Sustained Excellence Award. New Delhi office opens. Hines develops new region called Eurasia, which includes Poland, Russia and now India.
2007	—	Hines celebrates its 50th anniversary with more than 3,150 employees and almost 900 projects completed and under way around the globe. The Dubai office opens.
2008	—	Gerald D. Hines receives the first ever Visionary Leadership in Real Estate Development Award from Harvard Design School. Hines has more than 100 LEED certified, pre-certified and registered projects. Hines owns and/or manages more than 100 ENERGY STAR labeled buildings. Over five million square feet of Hines’ buildings receive the EPA’s “Designed to Earn the ENERGY STAR” (DEES) designation. Hines and Hines REIT win NAREIT’s “Leader in the Light” Award at the highest level.

D-5

No dealer, salesman or other person has been authorized to give any information or to make any representations other than those contained in this prospectus, in supplements to this prospectus, or in literature issued by us (which shall not be deemed to be a part of this prospectus), in connection with this offering. If given or made, such information or representation must not be relied upon. The statements in this prospectus or in any supplement are made as of the date hereof and thereof, unless another time is specified, and neither the delivery of this prospectus or any supplement nor the sale made hereunder shall, under any circumstances, create an implication that there has been no change in the facts set forth herein since the date hereof or thereof. However, if any material adverse changes occur during the period when a prospectus is required to be delivered to an investor, this prospectus or any supplement will be amended or supplemented accordingly.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Page
Suitability Standards
Questions and Answers About This Offering	ii
Prospectus Summary	1
Risk Factors	9
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements	36
Estimated Use of Proceeds	36
Management	39
Management Compensation, Expense Reimbursements and Operating Partnership Participation Interest	67
Our Real Estate Investments	71
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management	94
Conflicts of  Interest	95
Investment Objectives and Policies With Respect to Certain Activities	101
Selected Financial Data	110
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	111
Description of Capital Stock	132
Plan of  Distribution	142
The Operating  Partnership	150
Material Tax  Considerations	158
ERISA  Considerations	173
Legal Proceedings	175
Reports to  Shareholders	175
Supplemental Sales Material	176
Legal Opinions	176
Experts	177
Privacy Policy Notice	177
Incorporation by Reference	177
Where You Can Find More Information	178
Glossary of Terms	179
Financial  Statements	F-1
Appendix A — Subscription Agreement	A-1
Appendix B — Dividend Reinvestment Plan	B-1
Appendix C — Privacy Policy	C-1
Appendix D — Hines, History, Experience and Timeline	D-1

Hines Real Estate

Investment Trust, Inc.

$3,500,000,000 in

Common Shares

Offered to the Public

PROSPECTUS

April 30, 2009

PART II

INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS

All capitalized terms used and not defined in Part II of this registration statement shall have the meanings assigned to them in the prospectus which forms a part of this registration statement.

Item 31.  Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution

The following is a statement of expenses that were estimated at the commencement of the offering to be incurred by us in connection with the issuance and distribution of the securities being registered pursuant to this registration statement, other than the selling commissions, dealer manager fee, and reimbursements for bona fide due diligence activities described in the “Plan of Distribution” section of the prospectus contained in this registration statement. All amounts were estimated except the Securities Act registration fee and the FINRA filing fee.

	Amount*
Securities Act registration fee	$	137,550
FINRA filing fee		75,500
Blue sky qualification fees and expenses		279,000
Printing and engraving fees and expenses		7,569,000
Legal fees and expenses		2,172,000
Accounting fees and other professional expenses		500,000
Transfer agent and escrow fees		1,810,000
Educational conferences and seminars		863,680
Sales and advertising expenses		1,904,720
Miscellaneous		2,865,473	†
Total	$	18,176,923

____________

*	All of the listed expenses will be paid by the Advisor.
†	Includes certain internal personnel costs of the Advisor which will be paid by the Advisor.

Item 32.  Sales to Special Parties

Prior to November 30, 2009, when our board of directors determined to cease selling shares to the public under our primary offering, we were entitled to sell shares to retirement plans of participating broker-dealers, to participating broker-dealers themselves (and their employees), to IRAs and qualified plans of their registered representatives or to any one of their registered representatives in their individual capacities (and to each of their spouses, parents and minor children) at a 9.2% discount, or $9.15 per share, reflecting that no selling commissions or dealer manager fees will be paid in connection with such transactions. The net proceeds we received were not affected by such sales of shares made net of commissions.

Also prior to November 30, 2009, our directors and officers, both current and retired, as well as affiliates of Hines and their directors, officers and employees, both current and retired (and their spouses, parents and minor children) and entities owned substantially by such individuals, were allowed to purchase shares in this offering at a 9.2% discount, or $9.15 per share, reflecting the fact that no selling commissions or dealer manager fees will be paid in connection with any such sales. The net offering proceeds we received were not affected by such sales of shares at a discount. Hines and its affiliates were expected to hold their shares purchased as shareholders for investment and not with a view towards distribution.

In addition, Hines, the Dealer Manager or one of their affiliates may form one or more foreign-based entities for the purpose of raising capital from foreign investors to invest in our shares. Sales of our shares to any such foreign entity may be at a 9.2% discount, or $9.15 per share, reflecting the fact that no selling commissions or dealer manager fees will be paid in connection with any such transactions. The net offering proceeds we receive will not be affected by such sales of shares at a discount.

II-1

Item 33.  Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

Under the terms of our Employee and Director Incentive Share Plan, on each of July 6, 2005, June 7, 2006 and July 9, 2007, 1,000 restricted common shares were granted to each of our independent directors, Messrs. George A. Davis, Thomas A. Hassard and Stanley D. Levy. On April 1, 2008, 353.5 restricted common shares were issued to Mr. Paul B. Murphy, Jr., upon his election as an independent director. Additionally, on each of August 25, 2008 and August 31, 2009, 1,000 restricted common shares were granted to each of our independent directors, Messrs. George A. Davis, Thomas A. Hassard, Stanley D. Levy and Paul B. Murphy, Jr. Such shares were granted without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, in reliance upon the exemption from registration contained in Section 4(2) of the Secur ities Act.

There have been no other sales of unregistered securities within the past three years.

Item 34.  Indemnification of Directors and Officers

The Maryland General Corporation Law (the “MGCL”) permits a Maryland corporation to include in its charter a provision limiting the liability of its directors and officers to the corporation and its stockholders for money damages except for liability resulting from: (i) actual receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property or services or (ii) active and deliberate dishonesty established by a final judgment as being material to the cause of action.

Subject to the conditions set forth in this Item, our charter and bylaws provide that we shall, subject only to the limitations in our charter and bylaws, or any limitations required by the MGCL as the same exists or may hereafter be amended (but, in the case of any such amendment, only to the extent that such amendment narrows the limitations of our ability to provide indemnification rights compared to such rights existing prior to such amendment), indemnify and hold harmless any present or former director or officer of Hines REIT or any person who while serving as a director or officer of Hines REIT served at Hines REIT’s request as a trust manager, director, officer, partner, venturer, proprietor, trustee, employee, agent or similar functionary of another real estate investment trust or foreign or domestic corporation, partne rship, joint venture, sole proprietorship, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise (each an “Indemnified Party”) against, and shall pay, advance or reimburse the reasonable expenses of any Indemnified Party related to, any and all losses or liabilities reasonably incurred by any such person in connection with or by reason of any act or omission performed or omitted to be performed on our behalf in such capacities. Under our charter and bylaws, we shall not indemnify any Indemnified Party for any liability or loss suffered by such Indemnified Party, nor shall such Indemnified Party be held harmless for any loss or liability suffered by us, unless all of the following conditions are met: (i) the Indemnified Party determined, in good faith, that the course of conduct that caused the loss or liability was in our best interests; (ii) the Indemnified Party was acting on behalf of or performing services for us; (iii) such liability or loss was not the result of negligence or misconduct by such Indemnified Party except in the event that the Indemnified Party is or was an independent director, such liability or loss was not the result of gross negligence or willful misconduct; and (iv) such indemnification or agreement to hold harmless is recoverable only out of our net assets and not from our stockholders.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, we shall not indemnify any Indemnified Party for any loss, liability or expenses arising from or out of an alleged violation of federal or state securities laws unless one or more of the following conditions are met: (i) there has been a successful adjudication on the merits of each count involving alleged securities law violations as to the particular indemnitee; (ii) such claims have been dismissed with prejudice on the merits by a court of competent jurisdiction as to the particular indemnitee; or (iii) a court of competent jurisdiction approves a settlement of the claims against the particular indemnitee and finds that indemnification of the settlement and the related costs should be made, and the court considering the request for indemnification has been advised of the position of the Securities and Exchange Commission and of the published position of any state securities regulatory authority in which our securities were offered or sold as to indemnification for violations of securities laws. Our charter and bylaws provide that the advancement of our funds to an Indemnified Party for legal expenses and other costs incurred as a result of any legal action for which indemnification is being sought is permissible only if all of the following conditions are satisfied: (i) the legal action relates to acts or omissions with respect to the performance of duties or services by the Indemnified Party on behalf of us; (ii) the legal action is initiated by a third party who is not a shareholder of ours or the legal action is initiated by a shareholder acting in his or her capacity as such and a court of competent jurisdiction specifically approves such advancement; and (iii) the Indemnified Party undertakes to repay the advanced funds to us, together with the applicable legal rate of interest thereon, in cases in w hich such Indemnified Party is found not to be entitled to indemnification.

II-2

The MGCL requires a Maryland corporation (unless its charter provides otherwise, which our charter does not) to indemnify a director or officer who has been successful, on the merits or otherwise, in the defense of any proceeding to which he is made or threatened to be made a party by reason of his service in that capacity. The MGCL permits a Maryland corporation to indemnify its present and former directors and officers, among others, against judgments, penalties, fines, settlements and reasonable expenses actually incurred by them in connection with any proceeding to which they may be made or threatened to be made a party by reason of their service in those or other capacities unless it is established that: (i) the act or omission of the director or officer was material to the matter giving rise to the proceeding and (a) was committe d in bad faith or (b) was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty; (ii) the director or officer actually received an improper personal benefit in money, property or services; or (iii) in the case of any criminal proceeding, the director or officer had reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission was unlawful. However, under the MGCL a Maryland corporation may not provide indemnification for an adverse judgment in a suit by or in the right of the corporation or for a judgment of liability on the basis that personal benefit was improperly received, unless in either case a court orders indemnification, and then only for expenses. In addition, the MGCL permits a corporation to advance reasonable expenses to a director or officer upon the corporation’s receipt of: (i) a written affirmation by the director or officer of his good faith belief that he has met the standard of conduct necessary for indemnification by us as authorized by the corporation’s charter and bylaws; and (ii) a writte n undertaking by him or on his behalf to repay the amount paid or reimbursed by the corporation if it shall ultimately be determined that the standard of conduct was not met.

Indemnification under the provisions of the MGCL is not deemed exclusive of any other rights, by indemnification or otherwise, to which an officer or director may be entitled under our charter or bylaws, or under resolutions of stockholders or directors, contract or otherwise. We have entered into separate indemnification agreements with each of our directors and certain of our executive officers. The indemnification agreements require, among other things, that we indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by law and our charter, and advance to the directors and officers all related expenses, subject to reimbursement if it is subsequently determined that such indemnification or advance is not permitted. We also must indemnify and advance all expenses incurred by directors and officers seeking to enforce their rights under the indemnification agreements and cover directors and officers under our directors’ and officers’ liability insurance. Although these indemnification agreements offer substantially the same scope of coverage afforded by provisions in our charter and bylaws, as a contract, they cannot be unilaterally modified by the board of directors or by the stockholders to eliminate the rights they provide. We have purchased and maintain insurance on behalf of all of our directors and executive officers against liability asserted against or incurred by them in their official capacities with us, whether or not we are required or have the power to indemnify them against the same liability.

To the extent that the indemnification may apply to liabilities arising under the Securities Act, the Company has been advised that, in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such indemnification is contrary to public policy and, therefore, unenforceable pursuant to Section 14 of the Securities Act.

Item 35.  Treatment of Proceeds from Stock Being Registered

Not applicable.

II-3

Item 36.  Financial Statements and Exhibits

(a) Financial Statements:

(1) The following financial statements are incorporated by reference as part of the prospectus included in this registration statement as set forth in the section of the prospectus titled “Incorporation by Reference.”

Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. —
Consolidated Financial Statements – as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and for Each of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 2009:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	*
Consolidated Financial Statements:
Consolidated Balance Sheets	*
Consolidated Statements of Operations	*
Consolidated Statements of Equity	*
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	*
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	*
Hines U.S. Core Office Fund LP
Consolidated Financial Statements – as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and for Each of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 2009:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	*
Consolidated Financial Statements:	*
Consolidated Balance Sheets	*
Consolidated Statements of Operations	*
Consolidated Statements of Equity	*
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	*
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	*
HCB II River LLC Consolidated Financial Statements — as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and for Each of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 2009:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	*
Consolidated Financial Statements:	*
Consolidated Balance Sheets	*
Consolidated Statements of Operations	*
Consolidated Statements of Equity	*
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	*
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	*

Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. — Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Statements:
Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2009	*
Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of Operations Foer the Year Ended December 31, 2009	*
Unaudited Notes to Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Statements	*

____________

* See the “Incorporation by Reference” section of the prospectus included in this registration statement.

(b) Exhibits:

The documents listed on the Index to Exhibits are filed as exhibits to this registration statement.

II-4

Item 37.  Undertakings

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the o pinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:

(a) to file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement:

(i) to include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933;

(ii) to reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of this registration statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than a 20 percent change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the “Calculat ion of Registration Fee” table in the effective registration statement; and

(iii) to include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the registration statement or any material change to such information in the registration statement.

(b) (i) that, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof;

(ii) that all post-effective amendments will comply with the applicable forms, rules and regulations of the Commission in effect at the time such post-effective amendments are filed; and

(iii) to remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering.

(c) that, for the purpose of determining liability under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser:

(i) if the registrant is relying on Rule 430B:

(A) each prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3) shall be deemed to be part of the registration statement as of the date the filed prospectus was deemed part of and included in the registration statement; and

(B) each prospectus required to be filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(2), (b)(5), or (b)(7) as part of a registration statement in reliance on Rule 430B relating to an offering made pursuant to Rule 415(a)(1)(i), (vii), or (x) for the purpose of providing the information required by section 10(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 shall be deemed to be part of and included in the registration statement as of the earlier of the date such form of prospectus is first used after effectiveness or the date of the first contract of sale of securities in the offering described in the prospectus. As provided in Rule 430B, for liability purposes of the issuer and any person that is at that date an underwriter, such date shall be deemed to be a new effective date of the registration statement relating to the securities in the reg istration statement to which that prospectus relates, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof. Provided, however, that no statement made in a registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement or made in a document incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such effective date, supersede or modify any statement that was made in the registration statement or prospectus that was part of the registration statement or made in any such document immediately prior to such effective date; or

II-5

(ii) if the registrant is subject to Rule 430C, each prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) as part of a registration statement relating to an offering, other than registration statements relying on Rule 430B or other than prospectuses filed in reliance on Rule 430A, shall be deemed to be part of and included in the registration statement as of the date it is first used after effectiveness. Provided, however, that no statement made in a registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement or made in a document incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such first use, supersede or modify any statement that was made in the r egistration statement or prospectus that was part of the registration statement or made in any such document immediately prior to such date of first use.

(d) that, for the purpose of determining liability of the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser in the initial distribution of the securities: The undersigned registrant undertakes that in a primary offering of securities of the undersigned registrant pursuant to this registration statement, regardless of the underwriting method used to sell the securities to the purchaser, if the securities are offered or sold to such purchaser by means of any of the following communications, the undersigned registrant will be a seller to the purchaser and will be considered to offer or sell such securities to such purchaser:

(i) Any preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the undersigned registrant relating to the offering required to be filed pursuant to Rule 424;

(ii) Any free writing prospectus relating to the offering prepared by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant or used or referred to by the undersigned registrant;

(iii) The portion of any other free writing prospectus relating to the offering containing material information about the registrant or its securities provided by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant; and

(iv) Any other communication that is an offer in the offering made by the undersigned registrant to the purchaser.

(e) to file a sticker supplement pursuant to Rule 424(c) under the Securities Act during the distribution period describing each property not identified in the prospectus at such time as there arises a reasonable probability that such property will be acquired and to consolidate all such stickers into a post-effective amendment filed at least once every three months with the information contained in such amendment provided simultaneously to the existing shareholders. Each sticker supplement should disclose all compensation and fees received by the Advisor and its affiliates in connection with any such acquisition. The post-effective amendment shall include audited financial statements meeting the requirements of Rule 3-14 of Regulation S-X only for properties acquired during the distribution period.

(f) to file, after the end of the distribution period, a current report on Form 8-K containing the financial statements and any additional information required by Rule 3-14 of Regulation S-X, to reflect each commitment (i.e., the signing of a binding purchase agreement) made after the end of the distribution period involving the use of 10% or more (on a cumulative basis) of the net proceeds of the offering and to provide the information contained in such report to the shareholders at least once each quarter after the distribution period of the offering has ended.

II-6

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, the registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form S-11 and has duly caused this amendment to the registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the city of Houston, state of Texas on April 28, 2010.

Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.

By:  /s/ Charles N. Hazen  

Charles N. Hazen

President and Chief Executive Officer

II-7

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this amendment to the registration statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature		Title	Date
*		Chairman of the Board of Directors	April 28, 2010
Jeffrey C. Hines
/s/ Charles N. Hazen		President and Chief Executive Officer	April 28, 2010
Charles N. Hazen
*		Chief Financial Officer	April 28, 2010
Sherri W. Schugart
/s/ Frank R. Apollo		Senior Vice President — Finance; Treasurer and Secretary	April 28, 2010
Frank R. Apollo
*		Chief Accounting Officer	April 28, 2010
Ryan T. Sims
*		Director	April 28, 2010
Charles M. Baughn
*		Director	April 28, 2010
George A. Davis
*		Director	April 28, 2010
Thomas A. Hassard
*		Director	April 28, 2010
C. Hastings Johnson
*		Director	April 28, 2010
Stanley D. Levy
*		Director	April 28, 2010
Paul B. Murphy Jr.
*	/s/ Frank R. Apollo
	Frank R. Apollo Attorney-in-fact

II-8

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit No.	Description
1.1	Dealer Manager Agreement between Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and Hines Real Estate Investments, Inc. (formerly known as Hines Real Estate Securities, Inc.), dated June 30, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 1.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 7, 2008, and incorporated by reference herein).
1.2	Form of Selected Dealer Agreement, with Form of Dealer Management Agreement between Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and Hines Real Estate Investments, Inc. (formerly known as Hines Real Estate Securities, Inc.) (filed as Exhibit 1.1 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 dated June 27, 2008 to this Registration Statement).
1.3	Selected Dealer Agreement, dated October 14, 2008, by and among Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., Hines Real Estate Investments, Inc. (formerly known as Hines Real Estate Securities, Inc.), Hines Advisors Limited Partnership and Ameriprise Financial Services (filed as Exhibit 1.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 20, 2008 and incorporated by reference herein).
3.1	Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to the Registrant’s second Registration Statement on Form S-11, File No. 333-130114, originally filed on December 2, 2005 (the “Second Registration Statement”) on July 16, 2007, and incorporated by reference herein).
3.2	Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 3, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.1	Form of Subscription Agreement (included as Appendix A to the prospectus included in this Registration Statement).
5.1	Opinion of Venable LLP (filed as Exhibit 5.1 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 dated June 19, 2008 to this Registration Statement,).
8.1	Opinion of Greenberg Traurig, LLP as to tax matters (filed as Exhibit 8.1 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 dated June 19, 2008 to this Registration Statement,).
10.1	Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Hines REIT Properties, L.P. (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 5 to the Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-108780), originally filed on September 12, 2003 (the “Initial Registration Statement”), on May 25, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.2	Form of Property Management and Leasing Agreement between Hines REIT Properties, L.P. and Hines Interests Limited Partnership (filed as Exhibit 3.3 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.3	Advisory Agreement between Hines REIT Properties, L.P., Hines Advisors Limited Partnership and Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. dated July 1, 2008, as renewed on identical terms for an additional one-year term commencing on July 1, 2009, pursuant to a verbal agreement by and among the parties thereto (filed as Exhibit 1.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 7, 2008, and incorporated by reference herein).
10.4	Employee and Director Incentive Share Plan of Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Initial Registration Statement on March 2, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.5	Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment Plan (included as Appendix B to the prospectus included in this Registration Statement).
10.6	Seventh Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Hines-Sumisei U.S. Core Office Fund, L.P. (currently known as Hines U.S. Core Office Fund LP), dated September 1, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to this Registration Statement on April 16, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.7	Amendment to Seventh Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Hines-Sumisei U.S. Core Office Fund L.P., dated January 11, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.7 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to this Registration Statement on April 16, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.8	Third Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of Hines-Sumisei N.Y. Core Office Trust, (currently known as Hines NY Core Office Trust) dated December 21, 2005 (filed as Exhibit 10.7 to Post Effective Amendment No. 7 to the Initial Registration Statement on February 14, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.9	Hines-Sumisei NY Core Office Trust Articles of Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust, dated April 1, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.9 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to this Registration Statement on April 16, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.10	Amended and Restated Bylaws of Hines-Sumisei NY Core Office Trust (filed as Exhibit 10.8 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Initial Registration Statement on March 2, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.11	Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of Hines NY Core Office Trust, dated April 2, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.11 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to this Registration Statement on April 16, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.12	Amended and Restated Master Agreement dated as of March 31, 2003, among Hines Interests Limited Partnership, Hines US Core Office Properties LP and Sumitomo Life Realty (N.Y.), Inc., as amended (filed as Exhibit 10.9 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Initial Registration Statement on March 2, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).

10.13 Second Amended and Restated Shareholder Agreement for Hines-Sumisei NY Core Office Trust, dated as of December 21, 2005 (filed as Exhibit 10.10 to Post Effective Amendment No. 7 to the Initial Registration Statement on February 14, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).

II-9

10.14	Second Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement, dated as of October 12, 2005 (filed as Exhibit 10.11 to Post Effective Amendment No. 7 to the Initial Registration Statement on February 14, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.15	Amended and Restated Organization Agreement for Hines-Sumisei NY Core Office Trust, dated as of December 23, 2003, by and among General Motors Investment Management Corporation, Hines Interests Limited Partnership, Hines-Sumisei U.S. Core Office Fund, L.P., Hines-Sumisei NY Core Office Trust and various shareholders to Hines-Sumisei NY Core Office Trust (filed as Exhibit 10.12 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Initial Registration Statement on March 2, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.16	Amended Declaration of Trust of Hines-Sumisei NY Core Office Trust II (filed as Exhibit 10.13 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Initial Registration Statement on March 2, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.17	Amended Bylaws of Hines-Sumisei NY Core Office Trust II (filed as Exhibit 10.14 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Initial Registration Statement on March 2, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.18	Shareholder Agreement for Hines-Sumisei NY Core Office Trust II, dated as of February 2, 2004, by and among Promark Investment Advisors Inc., Hines-Sumisei U.S. Core Office Fund, L.P., Hines-Sumisei NY Core Office Trust II and certain shareholders of Hines-Sumisei NY Core Office Trust II (filed as Exhibit 10.15 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Initial Registration Statement on March 2, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.19	Subscription Agreement for Hines-Sumisei NY Core Office Trust and Hines-Sumisei NY Core Office Trust II, dated as of February 2, 2004, by and among Promark Investment Advisors Inc., Hines Interests Limited Partnership, Hines-Sumisei U.S. Core Office Fund, L.P., Hines-Sumisei NY Core Office Trust, Hines-Sumisei NY Core Office Trust II and various shareholders of Hines-Sumisei NY Core Office Trust and Hines-Sumisei NY Core Office Trust II (filed as Exhibit 10.16 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Initial Registration Statement on March 2, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.20	Subscription Agreement, dated as of September 11, 2003, between Hines REIT Properties, L.P. and Hines Real Estate Holdings Limited Partnership (filed as Exhibit 10.17 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Initial Registration Statement on March 2, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.21	Agreement, dated as of June 3, 2004, between Hines REIT Properties, L.P., Hines U.S. Core Office Capital Associates II Limited Partnership and Hines-Sumisei U.S. Core Office Fund, L.P. (filed as Exhibit 10.18 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 6 to the Initial Registration Statement on June 10, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.22	Amended and Restated Escrow Agreement between Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (filed as Exhibit 10.19 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Initial Registration Statement on March 2, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.23	Articles of Amendment dated May 4, 2004 to the Declaration of Trust of Hines-Sumisei N.Y. Core Office Trust II (filed as Exhibit 10.21 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 5 to the Initial Registration Statement on May 25, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.24	Articles of Amendment dated December 27, 2004 to the Declaration of Trust of Hines-Sumisei N.Y. Core Office Trust II (filed as Exhibit 10.23 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.25	Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated November 23, 2004, by and among Hines U.S. Core Office Capital Associates II Limited Partnership, Hines REIT Properties, L.P. and Hines U.S. Core Office Capital LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.22 to Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Initial Registration Statement on February 22, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.26	Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated February 1, 2005, by and among Hines US Core LLC, Hines REIT Properties, L.P. and Hines U.S. Core Office Capital LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.23 to Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Initial Registration Statement on February 22, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.27	Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Hines-Sumisei US Core Office Properties LP (filed as Exhibit 10.26 to Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Initial Registration Statement on February 22, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.28	Indemnification Agreement between Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and Jeffrey C. Hines (filed as Exhibit 10.27 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.29	Indemnification Agreement between Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and C. Hastings Johnson (filed as Exhibit 10.28 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.30	Indemnification Agreement between Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and George A. Davis (filed as Exhibit 10.29 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.31	Indemnification Agreement between Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and Thomas A. Hassard (filed as Exhibit 10.30 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.32	Indemnification Agreement between Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and Stanley D. Levy (filed as Exhibit 10.31 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.33	Indemnification Agreement between Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and Charles M. Baughn (filed as Exhibit 10.32 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.34	Indemnification Agreement between Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and Charles N. Hazen (filed as Exhibit 10.33 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.35	Indemnification Agreement between Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and Sherri W. Schugart (filed as Exhibit 10.34 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).

II-10

10.36	Indemnification Agreement between Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and Frank R. Apollo (filed as Exhibit 10.35 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.37	Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2005, by and among Hines US Core LLC, Hines REIT Properties L.P. and Hines U.S. Core Office Capital LLC (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 1, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.38	Agreement of Sale, dated March 10, 2005, by and between Madison Two Associates and Hines 70 West Madison LP (filed as Exhibit 10.37 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.39	Agreement of Purchase and Sale, dated as of May 19, 2005, between OTR, an Ohio general Partnership acting as duly authorized nominee of the Board of the State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio, and Hines REIT Properties, L.P. (filed as Exhibit 10.38 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.40	Property Management and Leasing Agreement, dated as of June 28, 2005, by and between Hines Interests Limited Partnership and 1900/2000 Alameda de las Pulgas LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.39 to Post Effective Amendment No. 4 to the Initial Registration Statement on August 22, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.41	Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Real Property and Escrow Instructions between GREIT — 525 and 600 B Street, LP and Hines-Sumisei US Core Office Properties, LP, dated June 27, 2005 (filed as Exhibit 10.41 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.42	Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of July 25, 2005, by and among Hines US Core LLC, as seller, Hines REIT Properties, L.P., as buyer, and acknowledged by Hines U.S. Core Office Capital LLC, the managing general partner of Hines-Sumisei U.S. Core Office Fund, L.P. (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 25, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.43	Term Loan Agreement, made and entered into as of June 28, 2005, by and between Hines REIT Properties, L.P. and KeyBank National Association, as agent for itself and the other lending institutions which may become parties thereto (filed as Exhibit 10.39 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.44	Ownership Interests Pledge and Security Agreement, dated June 28, 2005, by and between Hines REIT Properties, L.P. and KeyBank National Association, in its capacity as administrative agent (filed as Exhibit 10.40 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.45	First Amendment to Term Loan Agreement, dated August 23, 2005, between Hines REIT Properties, L.P. and KeyBank National Association, as administrative agent, and the other lenders from time to time parties to that certain Credit Agreement dated September 9, 2005 (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.46	Revolving Line of Credit Agreement, dated September 9, 2005, by and between Hines REIT Properties, L.P., and KeyBank National Association, as administrative agent, and the other lenders from time to time parties thereto (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.47	Unconditional Guaranty of Payment and Performance of Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. in favor of KeyBank National Association, as administrative agent, and the other lenders from time to time parties to that certain Credit Agreement dated September 9, 2005 (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.48	Ownership Interests Pledge and Security Agreement of Hines REIT Properties, L.P. dated September 9, 2005 (filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.49	Subordination Agreement, dated September 9, 2005, among Hines REIT Properties, L.P., Hines Advisors Limited Partnership, Hines Interests Limited Partnership and KeyBank National Association (filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.50	Agreement of Sale and Purchase, dated as of August 9, 2005 between Centex Office Citymark I, L.P. and Hines REIT Properties, L.P. (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.51	Agreement for Purchase of Office Building, dated effective as of August 12, 2005, between Hines REIT Properties, L.P. and JB Management L.P., as amended (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.52	Agreement of Sale, dated October 12, 2005, by and between Miami RPFIV Airport Corporate Center Associates Limited Liability Company and Hines REIT Properties, L.P. (including first through fourth amendments)(filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.53	Letter Agreement, dated November 9, 2005, among Hines-Sumisei U.S. Core Office Fund, L.P., Hines US Core Office Capital LLC and Hines REIT Properties, L.P. (filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).

10.54 Subscription Agreement, dated November 14, 2005, between Hines-Sumisei U.S. Core Office Fund, L.P. and Hines REIT Properties, L.P. (filed as Exhibit 10.53 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to the Initial Registration Statement and incorporated by reference herein).

II-11

10.55	Deed of Trust, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing, dated as of April 18, 2006, by and between Hines REIT 1515 S Street LP, First American Title Insurance Company and Met Life Bank, N.A., and Promissory Notes, dated April 18, 2006, executed by Hines REIT 1515 S Street LP (filed as Exhibit 10.59 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Second Registration Statement on April 25, 2006 and incorporated by reference herein).
10.56	Term Loan Agreement, dated as of April 24, 2006, between Hines REIT Properties, L.P., KeyBank National Association and the other Lenders party thereto, and Promissory Note executed by Hines REIT Properties, L.P., dated April 24, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.60 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Second Registration Statement on April 25, 2006 and incorporated by reference herein).
10.57	Unconditional Guaranty of Payment and Performance of Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. in favor of KeyBank National Association, dated April 24, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.61 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Second Registration Statement on April 25, 2006 and incorporated by reference herein).
10.58	Ownership Interests Pledge and Security Agreement of Hines REIT Properties, L.P., dated April 24, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.62 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Second Registration Statement on April 25, 2006 and incorporated by reference herein).
10.59	Subordination Agreement, dated April 24, 2006, among Hines REIT Properties, L.P., Hines Advisors Limited Partnership, Hines Interests Limited Partnership and KeyBank National Association (filed as Exhibit 10.63 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Second Registration Statement on April 25, 2006 and incorporated by reference herein).
10.60	Contract of Sale by and between Sumitomo Life Realty (N.Y.), Inc. and Hines One Atlantic Center LP, dated May 18, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.64 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Second Registration Statement on June 15, 2006, and incorporated by reference herein).
10.61	Agreement by and between Hines REIT Properties, L.P. and HSH Nordbank AG NY Branch dated June 5, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.65 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Second Registration Statement on June 15, 2006, and incorporated by reference herein).
10.62	Reimbursement Agreement, dated July 20, 2006, by and between Hines Interests Limited Partnership and Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.63	Agreement of Purchase and Sale, dated as of September 27, 2006, between MP Warner Center, LLC, MP Warner Center III, LLC, and Hines-Sumisei US Core Office Properties LP (as amended by Amendments No 1, dated September 15, 2006, and No. 2, dated September 27, 2006) (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.64	Credit Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2006, among Hines REIT 3100 McKinnon Street LP, Hines REIT 1900/2000 Alameda de las Pulgas LLC, Hines REIT 321 North Clark Street LLC and the Borrowing Base Subsidiaries party thereto from time to time, as Borrowers, Hines REIT Properties, L.P., as Sponsor, and HSH Nordbank AG, New York Branch and the Lenders party thereto from time to time, as Lenders (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.65	First Amendment to Credit Agreement and other Credit Documents, dated November 8, 2006, by and among Hines REIT Properties, L.P. and KeyBank National Association, for itself and the other lending institutions party to the Credit Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.72 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Second Registration Statement on December 19, 2006, and incorporated by reference herein).
10.66	First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of January 19, 2007, among Hines Reit 3100 McKinnon Street LP, Hines REIT 1900/2000 Alameda de las Pulgas LLC, Hines REIT 321 North Clark Street LLC and the Borrowing, Base Subsidiaries party thereto from time to time, as Borrowers, Hines REIT Properties, LP., as sponsor, HSH Nordbank AG, New York Branch, as lender and as Agent and Arranger, and the lenders party thereto from time to time (filed as Exhibit 10.77 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Second Registration Statement on February 23, 2007, and incorporated by reference herein).
10.67	Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of May 11, 2007, by and between Touchstone Venture II and Hines REIT Properties, L.P. (filed as Exhibit 10.79 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to the Second Registration Statement on July 16, 2007, and incorporated by reference herein).
10.68	Purchase and Sale Agreement and Joint Escrow Instructions, dated as of July 11, 2007, by and between Carlyle One Wilshire II, L.P. and Hines REIT One Wilshire LP (filed as Exhibit 10.80 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to the Second Registration Statement on July 16, 2007, and incorporated by reference herein).
10.69	Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of June 4, 2007, by and between 3 Huntington Quadrangle, LLC, and Hines REIT Properties, L.P. (filed as Exhibit 10.81 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to the Second Registration Statement on July 16, 2007, and incorporated by reference herein).
10.70	Agreement of Purchase and Sale, dated September 25, 2007, between Firstcal Industrial 2 Acquisition, LLC and Hines REIT Minneapolis Industrial LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K on October 1, 2007, and incorporated by reference herein).
10.71	First Amendment , dated September 27, 2007, to the Agreement of Purchase and Sale, dated September 25, 2007 between Firstcal Industrial 2 Acquisition, LLC and Hines REIT Minneapolis Industrial LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K on October 1, 2007, and incorporated by reference herein).
10.72	Agreement of Purchase and Sale, dated October 16, 2007, between 2200 Ross, L.P., and Hines REIT 2200 Ross Avenue, L.P. (filed as Exhibit 10.84 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to the Second Registration Statement on October 16, 2007, and incorporated by reference herein).

II-12

10.73	Deed of Trust and Security Agreement, dated October 25, 2007, by and between Hines REIT One Wilshire LP, First American Title Insurance Company and The Prudential Insurance Company of America (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K on October 31, 2007, and incorporated by reference herein).
10.74	Promissory Note by and between Hines REIT One Wilshire LP and The Prudential Insurance Company of America, dated October 25, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K on October 31, 2007, and incorporated by reference herein).
10.75	Environmental Liability by and between Hines REIT One Wilshire LP and The Prudential Insurance Company of America, dated October 25, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K on October 31, 2007, and incorporated by reference herein).
10.76	Agreement of Purchase and Sale, dated December 17, 2007, between Newkirk Segair L.P., LLC and Hines REIT El Segundo LP (filed as Exhibit 10.88 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 8 to the Second Registration Statement on January 16, 2008, and incorporated by reference herein).
10.77	Loan Facility Agreement, dated as of December 20, 2007, between Hines REIT 2007 Facility Holdings LLC and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (filed as Exhibit 10.89 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 8 to the Second Registration Statement on January 16, 2008, and incorporated by reference herein).
10.78	Deed of Trust, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing between Hines REIT 2200 Ross Avenue LP and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (filed as Exhibit 10.90 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 8 to the Second Registration Statement on January 16, 2008, and incorporated by reference herein).
10.79	Promissory Note between Hines REIT 2200 Ross Avenue LP and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (filed as Exhibit 10.91 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 8 to the Second Registration Statement on January 16, 2008, and incorporated by reference herein).
10.80	Mortgage, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing between Hines REIT Minneapolis Industrial LLC and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (filed as Exhibit 10.92 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 8 to the Second Registration Statement on January 16, 2008, and incorporated by reference herein).
10.81	Promissory Note between Hines REIT Minneapolis Industrial LLC and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (filed as Exhibit 10.93 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 8 to the Second Registration Statement on January 16, 2008, and incorporated by reference herein).
10.82	Agreement of Sale between Crown Center Redevelopment Corporation and Hines REIT 2555 Grand LLC, dated February 29, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 6, 2008 and incorporated by reference herein).
10.83	Contract of Sale between Transco Tower Limited and Hines REIT Properties L.P. dated March 18, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.95 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 10 to the Second Registration Statement dated April 15, 2008 and incorporated by reference herein).
10.84	Agreement of Sale between Crown Center Redevelopment Corporation and Hines REIT 2555 Grand LLC, dated February 29, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K on March 6, 2008, and incorporated by reference herein).
10.85	Contract of Sale between Transco Tower Limited and Hines REIT Properties L.P. dated March 18, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.95 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 10 to the Second Registration Statement dated April 15, 2008 and incorporated by reference herein).
10.86	Indemnification Agreement between Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and Paul B. Murphy, Jr., dated August 26, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.86 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated by reference herein).
10.87	Indemnification Agreement between Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and Edmund A. Donaldson, dated August 26, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.87 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated by reference herein).
10.88	Indemnification Agreement between Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and Kevin L. McMeans, dated August 26, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.88 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated by reference herein).
10.89	Indemnification Agreement between Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and Ryan T. Sims, dated August 26, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.89 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated by reference herein).

10.90	Agreement of Purchase and Sale, dated December 17, 2007, between Newkirk Segair L.P., LLC and Hines REIT El Segundo LP (filed as Exhibit 10.88 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 8 to the Second Registration Statement on January 16, 2008, and incorporated by reference herein).
10.91	Loan Facility Agreement, dated as of December 20, 2007, between Hines REIT 2007 Facility Holdings LLC and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (filed as Exhibit 10.89 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 8 to the Second Registration Statement on January 16, 2008, and incorporated by reference herein).
10.92	Deed of Trust, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing between Hines REIT 2200 Ross Avenue LP and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (filed as Exhibit 10.90 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 8 to the Second Registration Statement on January 16, 2008, and incorporated by reference herein).
10.93	Promissory Note between Hines REIT 2200 Ross Avenue LP and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (filed as Exhibit 10.91 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 8 to the Second Registration Statement on January 16, 2008, and incorporated by reference herein).

II-13

10.94		Mortgage, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing between Hines REIT Minneapolis Industrial LLC and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (filed as Exhibit 10.92 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 8 to the Second Registration Statement on January 16, 2008, and incorporated by reference herein).
10.95		Promissory Note between Hines REIT Minneapolis Industrial LLC and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (filed as Exhibit 10.93 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 8 to the Second Registration Statement on January 16, 2008, and incorporated by reference herein).
10.96		Agreement of Sale between Crown Center Redevelopment Corporation and Hines REIT 2555 Grand LLC, dated February 29, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 6, 2008 and incorporated by reference herein).
10.97		Contract of Sale between Transco Tower Limited and Hines REIT Properties L.P. dated March 18, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.95 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 10 to the Second Registration Statement dated April 15, 2008 and incorporated by reference herein).
10.98		Selected Dealer Agreement, dated October 14, 2008, by and among Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., Hines Real Estate Investments, Inc. (formerly known as Hines Real Estate Securities, Inc.), Hines Advisors Limited Partnership and Ameriprise Financial Services (filed as Exhibit 1.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 20, 2008 and incorporated by reference herein).
21.1		List of Subsidiaries of Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 21.1 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to this Registration Statement on September 28, 2009, and incorporated by reference herein).
23.1	*	Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP
23.2		Consent of Venable LLP (included in Exhibit 5.1).
23.3		Consent of Greenberg Traurig, LLP (included in Exhibit 8.1).
23.4		Consent of Greenberg Traurig, LLP (filed as Exhibit 23.5 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to this Registration Statement on April 16, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
24.1		Power of Attorney of certain signatories (included in signature pages to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to this Registration Statement).

____________

* Filed herewith.

II-14