Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2013 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | ' |
Equity Method Investments Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
The Company has made investments directly through entities wholly-owned by the Operating Partnership, or indirectly through other entities, such as through its investment in Hines US Core Office Fund LP (the “Core Fund”) in which it owned a 28.8% and 27.1% non-managing general partner interest as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The Company also owned a 70% interest in the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio indirectly through a joint venture with Weingarten Realty Investors (“Weingarten”) as of both December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012. The Company accounts for each of these investments using the equity method of accounting. See Note 16 — Subsequent Events regarding the dissolution of the Company's joint venture with Weingarten. As a result of the joint venture dissolution, certain properties in the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio were distributed to the Company and to Weingarten. Collectively, the Company refers to this transaction as the “Grocery-Anchored Portfolio Transaction.” |
|
In January 2013, the Company sold its 50% interest in Distribution Park Rio, an industrial property in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil to an affiliate of Hines. As of December 31, 2012, the Company had a 50% interest in Distribution Park Rio, which was also accounted for as an equity method investment until it was sold in 2013. See Note 5 — Investments in Unconsolidated Entities for additional information regarding the Company’s investments in unconsolidated entities. |
The Company evaluates the need to consolidate joint ventures in accordance with GAAP. In accordance with GAAP, the Company will consolidate joint ventures that are determined to be variable interest entities for which it is the primary beneficiary. Partially owned real estate joint ventures and partnerships over which the Company has a controlling financial interest are consolidated in its financial statements. In determining if the Company has a controlling financial interest, it considers factors such as ownership interest, authority to make decisions, kick-out rights and substantive participating rights. Management continually analyzes and assesses reconsideration events, including changes in these factors, to determine if the consolidation treatment remains appropriate. Partially owned real estate joint ventures and partnerships where it does not have a controlling financial interest, but has the ability to exercise significant influence, are accounted for using the equity method. |
|
The Company’s investments in partially-owned real estate joint ventures and partnerships are reviewed for impairment periodically. The Company will record an impairment charge if it determines that a decline in the fair value of an investment below its carrying value is other than temporary. The Company’s analysis will be dependent on a number of factors, including the performance of each investment, current market conditions, and its intent and ability to hold the investment to full recovery. Based on the Company’s analysis of the facts and circumstances at each reporting period, no impairment was recorded related to its investments in the Core Fund and the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011. Further, no impairment was recorded related to the Company’s investment in Distribution Park Rio for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. The Company sold its investment in Distribution Park Rio in January 2013 and recognized a gain of $16.1 million as a result of the sale. However, if market conditions deteriorate in the future and result in lower valuations or reduced cash flows of the Company’s investments, impairment charges may be recorded in future periods. |
Use Of Estimates Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Use of Estimates |
|
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and contingencies as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. The Company evaluates its assumptions and estimates on an ongoing basis. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that the Company believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Additionally, application of the Company’s accounting policies involves exercising judgments regarding assumptions as to future uncertainties. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. |
Basis Of Accounting Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Basis of Presentation |
|
The consolidated financial statements of the Company included in this annual report include the accounts of Hines REIT, the Operating Partnership and the Operating Partnership’s wholly-owned subsidiaries as well as the related amounts of noncontrolling interest. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. |
Foreign Currency Transactions And Translations Policy[Policy Text Block] | ' |
International Operations |
|
In addition to its properties in the United States, the Company has owned investments in Canada and Brazil. The Company’s foreign subsidiaries translated their financial statements into U.S. dollars for reporting purposes. Assets and liabilities were translated at the exchange rate in effect as of the balance sheet date. Income statement amounts were translated using the average exchange rate for the period and significant nonrecurring transactions using the rate on the transaction date. Gains and losses resulting from translation were included in accumulated other comprehensive income as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. The Company disposed of its investment in Distribution Park Rio in January 2013 as well as its investment in Toronto, Ontario in June 2011. Upon disposal of these properties, the Company realized a gain or loss related to the currency translation adjustment which was included in the gain on disposal in its consolidated statement of operations. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company realized a loss of $0.9 million related to a currency translation adjustment as a result of the disposal of its indirectly-owned property in Brazil. During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company realized gains of $8.9 million related to a currency translation adjustment as a result of the disposal of its directly-owned property in Canada. Accumulated other comprehensive income as of December 31, 2013 is related to remaining non-operating net assets of the disposed directly-owned properties in Brazil and Canada. |
Property, Plant and Equipment, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Investment Property and Lease Intangibles |
|
Real estate assets that the Company owns directly are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method. The estimated useful lives for computing depreciation are generally 10 years for furniture and fixtures, 15-20 years for electrical and mechanical installations and 40 years for buildings. Major replacements that extend the useful life of the assets are capitalized and maintenance and repair costs are expensed as incurred. |
|
Acquisitions of properties are accounted for utilizing the acquisition method and, accordingly, are recorded at the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The results of operations of acquired properties are included in the Company’s results of operations from their respective dates of acquisition. Estimates of fair values are based upon estimates of future cash flows and other valuation techniques that the Company believes are similar to those used by market participants and are used to record the purchase of identifiable assets acquired, such as land, buildings and improvements, equipment and identifiable intangible assets related to in-place leases and liabilities assumed, such as amounts related to acquired out-of-market leases, asset retirement obligations, mortgage notes payable. Values of buildings and improvements are determined on an as if vacant basis. Initial valuations are subject to change until such information is finalized, no later than 12 months from the acquisition date. Acquisition-related costs such as transaction costs and acquisition fees paid to the Advisor are expensed as incurred. |
|
The estimated fair value of acquired in-place leases are the costs the Company would have incurred to lease the properties to the occupancy level of the properties at the date of acquisition. Such estimates include the fair value of leasing commissions, legal costs and other direct costs that would be incurred to lease the properties to such occupancy levels. Additionally, the Company evaluates the time period over which such occupancy levels would be achieved. Such evaluation will include an estimate of the net market-based rental revenues and net operating costs (primarily consisting of real estate taxes, insurance and utilities) that would be incurred during the lease-up period. Acquired in-place leases as of the date of acquisition are amortized over the remaining lease terms. Should a tenant terminate its lease, the unamortized portion of the in-place lease value is charged to amortization expense. |
|
Acquired out-of-market lease values (including ground leases) are recorded based on the present value (using a discount rate that reflects the risks associated with the lease acquired) of the difference between the contractual amounts paid pursuant to the in-place leases and management’s estimate of fair market value lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases. The capitalized out-of-market lease values are amortized as adjustments to rental revenue (or ground lease expense, as applicable) over the remaining terms of the respective leases, which include periods covered by bargain renewal options. Should a tenant terminate its lease, the unamortized portion of the out-of-market lease value is charged to rental revenue. |
|
Management estimated the fair value of assumed mortgage notes payable based upon indications of then-current market pricing for similar types of debt with similar maturities. Assumed mortgage notes payable were initially recorded at their estimated fair value as of the assumption date, and the difference between such estimated fair value and the note’s outstanding principal balance is amortized to interest expense over the life of the mortgage note payable. |
Impairment Or Disposal Of Long Lived Assets Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Real estate assets are reviewed for impairment each reporting period if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the individual property may not be recoverable. In such an event, a comparison will be made of the current and projected cash flows of each property on an undiscounted basis to the carrying amount of such property. If undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount, such carrying amount would be adjusted, if necessary, to estimated fair value to reflect impairment in the value of the asset. See Note 13 — Fair Value Disclosures for additional information regarding our policy for determining fair values of our investment property. |
|
During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company determined that four of its directly-owned investment properties located in El Segundo, California, Miami, Florida, Minneapolis, Minnesota and Dallas, Texas were impaired, since the projected undiscounted cash flows for these properties were less than their carrying values. As a result, an impairment loss of $33.9 million (which excludes $4.0 million that is recorded in discontinued operations) was recorded to write down their carrying values to their fair value for the year ended December 31, 2013. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company determined that three of its directly-owned investment properties located in Minneapolis, Minnesota, Melville, New York and Seattle, Washington were impaired, since the projected undiscounted cash flows for these properties were less than their carrying values. As a result, an impairment loss was recorded related to those certain properties of $53.5 million to write down the carrying value of these assets to their fair value for the year ended December 31, 2012. During the year ended December 31, 2011, no impairment losses were recorded for the Company’s directly-owned investment properties. If market conditions deteriorate or if management’s plans for certain properties change, additional impairment charges could be required in the future. See Note 13 — Fair Value Disclosures — Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis — Impairment of Investment Property for additional information. |
|
During the year ended December 31, 2013, no impairment loss was recorded related to the Company’s indirectly-owned properties. During the year ended December 31, 2012, impairment losses of $90.1 million were recorded related to seven of the Company’s indirectly-owned properties, five of which were located in the suburban area outside of Sacramento, California and two of which were located in Charlotte, North Carolina. Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2011, impairment losses of $101.1 million were recorded related to five of the Company’s indirectly-owned properties located in the suburban area outside of Sacramento, California. Four of the five properties located in the suburban area outside of Sacramento, California were sold in December 2012 and the fifth property was returned to the lender in January 2013. See Note 5 — Investments in Unconsolidated Entities for additional information. |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
The Company considers all short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to cash with an original maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. |
Cash And Cash Equivalents Restricted Cash And Cash Equivalents Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
|
Restricted Cash |
|
As of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company had restricted cash of $119.8 million and $120.9 million, respectively. In May 2011, the Company replaced the HSH Nordbank Collateral deposit with a letter of credit from the Bank of Montreal. As collateral for the letter of credit, the Company posted a cash deposit of $107.0 million with the Bank of Montreal, which is classified as restricted cash in the consolidated balance sheets. HSH Nordbank has the right to have the properties serving as collateral under the HSH Nordbank credit facility appraised every two years. Subject to this requirement, in October 2012, HSH Nordbank notified the Company that the outstanding principal amounts under the facility exceeded 55% of the appraised values of the properties and therefore the Company would be required to provide additional collateral in the amount of $9.9 million to rebalance the portfolio. The Company obtained a letter of credit from the Bank of Montreal in October 2012 in order to meet the additional collateral required by HSH Nordbank. As collateral for the letter of credit, the Company posted an additional $9.9 million cash deposit with the Bank of Montreal. |
|
The remaining balance in restricted cash for each period is related to escrow accounts required by certain of the Company’s mortgage agreements. |
Concentration Risk, Credit Risk, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
|
Concentration of Credit Risk |
|
As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company had cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash deposited in certain financial institutions in excess of federally insured levels. Management regularly monitors the financial stability of these financial institutions in an effort to manage the Company’s exposure to any significant credit risk in cash and cash equivalents or restricted cash. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation generally only insures limited amounts per depositor per insured bank. |
|
As of December 31, 2013, the Company had a $117.2 million deposit held by the Bank of Montreal as collateral for the properties under the Company’s pooled mortgage facility. Management regularly monitors the financial stability of this financial institution in an effort to manage its exposure to any significant risk related to its deposit. |
Tenant and Other Receivables Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
|
Tenant and Other Receivables |
|
Receivable balances outstanding consist primarily of base rents, tenant reimbursements and receivables attributable to straight-line rent. An allowance for the uncollectible portion of tenant and other receivables is determined based upon an analysis of the tenant’s payment history, the financial condition of the tenant, business conditions in the industry in which the tenant operates and economic conditions in the area in which the property is located. Tenant and other receivables are shown at cost in the consolidated balance sheets, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $4.6 million and $6.1 million at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. |
Deferred Charges Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Deferred Leasing Costs |
|
Deferred leasing costs primarily consist of direct leasing costs such as third-party leasing commissions and tenant inducements. Deferred leasing costs are capitalized and amortized over the life of the related lease. Tenant inducement amortization is recorded as a reduction to rental revenue and the amortization of other direct leasing costs is recorded as a component of amortization expense. |
|
Tenant inducement amortization was $16.7 million, $15.4 million and $12.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and was recorded as an offset to rental revenue. In addition, the Company recorded $6.2 million, $6.6 million and $5.7 million as amortization expense related to other direct leasing costs for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. |
|
Deferred Financing Costs |
|
Deferred financing costs as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 consist of direct costs incurred in obtaining debt financing (see Note 6 — Debt Financing), including the financing fees paid to our Advisor (see Note 9 — Related Party Transactions). These costs are amortized into interest expense on a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective interest method, over the terms of the obligations. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, $3.5 million, $1.6 million and $4.0 million, respectively, of deferred financing costs were amortized into interest expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. |
Other Assets Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Other Assets |
|
Other assets included the following (in thousands): |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 | | | | | | | | | |
Deposit on investment property (see Note 16 — Subsequent Events) | $ | 30,000 | | | $ | — | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Prepaid insurance | 686 | | | 972 | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Prepaid/deferred taxes | 517 | | | 1,269 | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Other | 769 | | | 880 | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total | $ | 31,972 | | | $ | 3,121 | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Revenue Recognition Real Estate Transactions Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Revenue Recognition |
|
Rental payments are generally paid by the tenants prior to the beginning of each month. As of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, the Company recorded liabilities of $6.2 million and $11.1 million related to prepaid rental payments which were included in other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The Company recognizes rental revenue on a straight-line basis over the life of the lease including rent holidays, if any. Straight-line rent receivable was $40.9 million and $56.2 million as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Straight-line rent receivable consisted of the difference between the tenants’ rents calculated on a straight-line basis from the date of acquisition or lease commencement over the remaining terms of the related leases and the tenants’ actual rents due under the lease agreements and is included in tenant and other receivables in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Revenues associated with operating expense recoveries are recognized in the period in which the expenses are incurred based upon the tenant lease provisions. Revenues relating to lease termination fees are recognized on a straight-line basis amortized from the time that a tenant’s right to occupy the leased space is modified through the end of the revised lease term. |
|
Other revenues consist primarily of parking revenue and tenant reimbursements. Parking revenue represents amounts generated from contractual and transient parking and is recognized in accordance with contractual terms or as services are rendered. Other revenues relating to tenant reimbursements are recognized in the period that the expense is incurred. |
Income Tax, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
|
Income Taxes |
|
Hines REIT has elected to be treated as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). In addition, as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 the Company owned an investment in the Core Fund, which has invested in properties through other entities that have elected to be taxed as REITs. |
|
Hines REIT’s management believes that the Company and the applicable entities in the Core Fund are organized and operate in such a manner as to qualify for treatment as REITs and intend to operate in the foreseeable future in such a manner so that they will remain qualified as REITs for federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, no provision has been made for U.S. federal income taxes in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. In 2013, 2012 and 2011, income tax expense recorded by the Company was primarily comprised of a provision for the Texas margin tax. The Company does not believe it has any uncertain tax positions or unrecognized tax benefits requiring disclosure. |
|
Included in the gain on sale of real estate in Note 4 — Discontinued Operations for the year ended December 31, 2011 is approximately $7.6 million in Canadian income tax expense related to the sale of Atrium on Bay in June 2011. |
|
Common Stock Redemption Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Redemption of Common Stock |
|
In March 2013, the Company’s board of directors amended and restated the Company’s share redemption program to reinstate the program effective for share redemption requests received on or after April 1, 2013 at $5.75 per share, subject to the conditions and limitations described in the amended and restated share redemption program. Prior to its reinstatement, the share redemption program had been suspended by the board of directors since November 30, 2009, except with respect to redemption requests made in connection with the death or disability (as defined in the Code) of a stockholder. Generally, funds available for redemption are limited to the amount of proceeds received from the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan in the prior quarter. However, the board of directors has the discretion to redeem shares in excess of this amount if it determines there are sufficient available funds and it is appropriate to do so as long as the total amount redeemed does not exceed the amount required to redeem 10% of the Company’s shares outstanding as of the same date in the prior calendar year. The board of directors determined to waive the limitation on the share redemption plan and fully honor all eligible requests received for the quarters ended June 30, 2013, September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2013 totaling $51.2 million, which was in excess of the $23.0 million received from the dividend reinvestment plan in the prior quarters. The Company has recorded liabilities of $12.9 million and $2.6 million in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, related to shares tendered for redemption and approved by the board of directors, but which were not redeemed until the subsequent month. Such amounts have been included in redemption of common shares in the accompanying consolidated statements of equity based on a redemption price of $5.45 per share for ordinary share redemption requests and $6.40 per share for death and disability redemption requests, which prices were determined in connection with the board of directors’ determination of a new net asset value per share in November 2013. |
Earnings Per Share Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Per Share Data |
|
Net income (loss) per common share is calculated by dividing the net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders for each period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during such period. Net income (loss) per common share on a basic and diluted basis is the same because the Company has no potentially dilutive common shares outstanding. |
Reclassification, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Reclassifications |
|
The Company sold Williams Tower, One Wilshire and the Raytheon/DIRECTV buildings during 2013 and Atrium on Bay during 2011. The Company reclassified the results of operations for these properties into discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented. See Note 4 — Discontinued Operations for additional information. |
|
New Accounting Pronouncements Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
|
In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance on disclosures about offsetting assets and liabilities. This guidance results in enhanced disclosures by requiring improved information about financial instruments and derivative instruments that are either (1) offset in accordance with either ASC 210-20-45 or ASC 815-10-45 or (2) subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement, irrespective of whether they are offset in accordance with either ASC 210-20-45 or ASC 815-10-45. The adoption of this guidance was effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 and interim periods within those annual periods. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements. |
|
In October 2012, FASB clarified and relocated guidance in the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC” or the “Codification”), corrected unintended application of guidance and made minor improvements to the Codification that are not expected to have a significant effect on current accounting practice. Amendments made to the Codification without transition guidance are effective upon issuance and amendments subject to transition guidance were effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2012. This guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements. |
|
In February 2013, FASB issued guidance to improve the transparency of reporting reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The adoption of this guidance was effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2012. This guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements. |
|
In February 2013, FASB issued amendments to provide guidance on the recognition, measurement and disclosure of obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of obligation within the scope of this guidance is fixed at the reporting date, except for obligations addressed within existing guidance in GAAP. The amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. The Company does not believe the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on the Company's financial statements. |
|
In March 2013, FASB issued guidance on releasing cumulative translation adjustments when a reporting entity ceases to have a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets that is a business within a foreign entity. In addition, these amendments provide guidance on the release of cumulative translation adjustments in partial sales of equity method investments. The guidance is effective on a prospective basis for fiscal years and interim reporting periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2013. The Company does not believe the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on the Company's financial statements. |
|
In July 2013, FASB issued amendments to the Codification to provide guidance on the presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. These amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 31, 2013. The Company does not believe the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements. |
Derivatives Methods Of Accounting Nonhedging Derivatives Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
The Company has several interest rate swap transactions with HSH Nordbank. These swap transactions were entered into as economic hedges against the variability of future interest rates on the Company’s variable interest rate borrowings with HSH Nordbank. The Company has not designated any of its derivative instruments as hedging instruments for accounting purposes. The interest rate swaps have been recorded at their estimated fair value in the accompanying balance sheets and changes in the fair value were recorded in gain (loss) on derivative instruments, net in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations (see Note 13 — Fair Value Disclosures for additional information). |
Fees and Expense Reimbursements [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, which, if not renewed, expires on December 31, 2014, the Company is required to pay the following fees and expense reimbursements: |
|
Asset Management Fees — The Company pays asset management fees to the Advisor for services related to managing, operating, directing and supervising the operations and administration of the Company and its assets. Prior to July 1, 2011, the asset management fees were earned by the Advisor monthly in an amount equal to 0.0625% of the net equity capital the Company has invested in real estate investments as of the end of each month. For the period July 1, 2011 through December 31, 2012, our Advisor agreed to waive a portion of its monthly cash asset management fee such that the fee was reduced from 0.0625% to 0.0417% (0.75% to 0.50% on an annual basis) of the net equity capital we have invested in real estate investments as of the end of each month. This waiver is not a deferral and accordingly, these fees will not be paid to the Advisor in cash at any time in the future. Asset management fees are expensed in the consolidated statements of operations and unpaid amounts are included in due to affiliates in the consolidated balance sheets. |
|
Debt Financing Fee — The Company pays financing fees to the Advisor for services related to identifying and evaluating potential financing and refinancing sources, negotiating and executing financing agreements and monitoring the debt facilities. These fees are equal to 1.0% of the amount (i) obtained under any property loan or (ii) made available to the Company under any other debt financing. As the Company incurs the financing fees payable to the Advisor, these fees will be deferred and amortized into interest expense using a straight-line method, which approximates the effective interest method, over the life of the related debt. In the case of a debt modification, the Company will expense the financing fees payable to the Advisor as incurred. |
|
Reimbursement by the Advisor to the Company — The Advisor must reimburse the Company quarterly for any amounts by which operating expenses exceed, in any four consecutive fiscal quarters, the greater of (i) 2.0% of the Company’s average invested assets, which consists of the average book value of its real estate properties, both equity interests in and loans secured by real estate, before reserves for depreciation or bad debts or other similar non-cash reserves, or (ii) 25.0% of its net income (as defined by the Company’s Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation), excluding the gain on sale of any of the Company’s assets, unless Hines REIT’s independent directors determine that such excess was justified. Operating expenses generally include all expenses paid or incurred by the Company as determined by generally accepted accounting principles, except certain expenses identified in Hines REIT’s Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Company did not exceed this limitation. |
Property Management And Leasing Fees [Policy Text Block] | ' |
The Company has entered into property management and leasing agreements with Hines to manage the leasing and operations of properties in which it directly invests. As compensation for its services, Hines receives the following: |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
• | A property management fee equal to the lesser of 2.5% of the annual gross revenues received from the properties or the amount of property management fees recoverable from tenants of the property under the leases. Property management fees are expensed in the consolidated statements of operations and unpaid amounts are included in due to affiliates in the consolidated balance sheets. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
• | A leasing fee of 1.5% of gross revenues payable over the term of each executed lease including any lease renewal, extension, expansion or similar event and certain construction management and re-development construction management fees, in the event Hines renders such services. Leasing fees are recorded in deferred lease costs and are amortized over the life of the lease to which they relate. Unpaid amounts are included in due to affiliates in the consolidated balance sheets. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
• | The Company is generally required to reimburse Hines for certain operating costs incurred in providing property management and leasing services pursuant to the property management and leasing agreements. Included in this reimbursement of operating costs are the cost of personnel and overhead expenses related to such personnel who are located at the property as well as off-site personnel located in Hines’ headquarters and regional offices, to the extent the same relate to or support the performance of Hines’s duties under the agreement. However, the reimbursable cost of these off-site personnel and overhead expenses will be limited to the lesser of the amount that is recovered from the tenants under their leases and/or a limit calculated based on the rentable square feet covered by the agreement. These costs, net of payments, resulted in liabilities which have been included in due to affiliates in the consolidated balance sheets. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Participation Interest [Policy Text Block] | ' |
The Participation Interest |
|
Pursuant to the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership (the “Partnership Agreement”), HALP owns a profits interest in the Operating Partnership. The number of units underlying the Participation Interest increases on a monthly basis in relation to the portion of any asset management fees or acquisition fees that is paid through equity units rather than cash. The profits interest in the Operating Partnership attributable to the Participation Interest was 5.7% and 4.8% as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The Participation Interest entitles HALP to receive distributions from the Operating Partnership based upon its percentage interest in the Operating Partnership at the time of distribution. The holder of the Participation Interest has the right to request the repurchase of the Participation Interest from the Company at any time, subject to a one-year holding period. The Company determines if the Participation Interest will be converted into cash or common shares except in the event that the Advisor is terminated by the Company. In the event that the Company terminates the Advisor, the holder of the Participation Interest may determine to have the Participation Interest repurchased in cash or common shares. Currently, it is the Company’s expectation that the Participation Interest will ultimately be settled in cash. Accordingly, the Participation Interest obligation has been classified as a liability in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets based on the estimated settlement value of this ownership interest plus any unpaid distributions, instead of equity, since it is probable that its ultimate settlement will be in the form of cash. |
|
The conversion and redemption features of the participation interest are accounted for in accordance with GAAP. Redemptions of the Participation Interest for cash will be accounted for as a reduction to the liability discussed above to the extent of such liability. Conversions into common shares of the Company will be recorded as an increase to the outstanding common shares and additional paid-in capital accounts and a corresponding reduction in the liability discussed above. Redemptions and conversions of the Participation Interest will result in a corresponding reduction in the ownership percentage of the Operating Partnership attributable to the Participation Interest and will have no impact on the calculation of subsequent increases in the Participation Interest. |
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
In general, fair values determined by Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities the Company has the ability to access. Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs utilize inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets and inputs other than quoted prices observable for the asset or liability, such as interest rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability. In instances in which the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety has been determined is based on the lowest level input significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. |
|
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis |
|
The Company records liabilities related to the fair values of its interest rate swap contracts. The valuation of these instruments is determined based on assumptions that management believes market participants would use in pricing, using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities. The fair values of our interest rate contracts have been determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts (or payments) and the discounted expected variable cash payments (or receipts). The variable cash payments (or receipts) are based on an expectation of future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate curves. |
|
Although the Company has determined the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by the Company and its counterparty, HSH Nordbank. In adjusting the fair values of its derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, the Company has considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds and guarantees. However, as of December 31, 2013, the Company has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuations of its derivatives. As a result, the Company has determined its derivative valuations are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. |
|
The following fair value hierarchy table sets forth the Company’s interest rate swaps which are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, which equals book value, by level within the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 (in thousands). The Company’s derivative financial instruments are recorded in interest rate swap contracts in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The Company has not designated any of its derivative instruments as hedging instruments for accounting purposes. |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Basis of Fair Value Measurements |
Description | | Fair Value | | Quoted Prices In Active Markets for Identical Items (Level 1) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
December 31, 2013 | | $ | 67,652 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 67,652 | | | $ | — | |
|
December 31, 2012 | | $ | 101,211 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 101,211 | | | $ | — | |
|
|
Financial Instruments Fair Value Disclosures |
|
As of December 31, 2013, management estimated that the fair value of notes payable, which had a carrying value of $795.7 million, was $794.1 million. As of December 31, 2012, management estimated that the fair value of notes payable, which had a carrying value of $1.3 billion, was $1.3 billion. The discount rates used approximate current lending rates for loans or groups of loans with similar maturities and credit quality, assumes the debt is outstanding through maturity and considers the debt’s collateral (if applicable). Management has utilized market information as available or present value techniques to estimate the amounts required to be disclosed. The Company has determined the majority of the inputs used to value its notes payable fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit quality adjustments associated with its fair value of notes payable utilize Level 3 inputs. However, as of December 31, 2013, the Company has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit quality adjustments on the overall valuations of its fair market value of notes payable and has determined that they are not significant. As a result, the Company has determined these financial instruments utilize Level 2 inputs. Since such amounts are estimates that are based on limited available market information for similar transactions, there can be no assurance that the disclosed values could be realized. |
|
Other financial instruments not measured at fair value on a recurring basis include cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, distributions receivable, tenant and other receivables, accounts payable and accrued expenses, other liabilities, due to affiliates and distributions payable. The carrying value of these items reasonably approximates their fair value based on their highly-liquid nature and/or short-term maturities. Due to the short-term nature of these instruments, Level 1 and Level 2 inputs are utilized to estimate the fair value of these financial instruments. |
|
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis |
|
Certain long-lived assets are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis. These assets are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis, but are subject to fair value adjustments (i.e., impairments) in certain circumstances. The fair value methodologies used to measure long-lived assets are described in Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — Impairment of Investment Property. The inputs associated with the valuation of long-lived assets are generally included in Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, as discussed below. |
|
Impairment of Investment Property |
|
Investment properties are reviewed for impairment at each reporting period if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. During 2013, the Company determined that its directly-owned investment, Airport Corporate Center and 4050/4055 Corporate Drive, were impaired due to a shortened expected hold period. Further, the Company determined that its directly-owned investment, the Minneapolis Office/Flex portfolio was impaired due to a shortened expected hold period and a reduction in market conditions. As a result of these changes in assumptions, the projected undiscounted cash flows were reduced for these investments. |
|
Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company determined that its directly-owned investments, Seattle Design Center and Three Huntington Quadrangle, were impaired due to a shortened expected hold period, which reduced the projected undiscounted cash flows for these investments. Also, during the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company determined that its directly-owned investment, a building in its Minneapolis Office/Flex portfolio, was impaired due to a change in leasing assumptions and appraised values. |
|
These changes in assumptions resulted in the net book value of the assets exceeding the projected undiscounted cash flows for these investments. As a result, these assets were written down to fair value. The following table summarizes activity for the Company’s assets measured at fair value, on a non-recurring basis, for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands). |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Basis of Fair Value Measurements | | | | | | | | |
During the year ended | Description | Fair Value of Assets | | Quoted Prices | | Significant | | Significant | | Impairment | | | | | | |
In Active | Other | Unobservable | Loss | | | | | | |
Markets for | Observable | Inputs | | | | | | | |
Identical Items | Inputs | (Level 3) | | | | | | | |
(Level 1) | (Level 2) | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2013 | Investment property | $170,466 | | $— | | $— | | $170,466 | | $33,878 | | | | | | |
December 31, 2012 | Investment property | $85,184 | | $— | | $— | | $85,184 | | $53,483 | | | | | | |
December 31, 2011 | N/A | $— | | $— | | $— | | $— | | $— | | | | | | |
|
The Company’s estimated fair value of investment properties was based on a comparison of recent market activity and discounted cash flow models, which include estimates of property-specific inflows and outflows over a specific holding period. Significant unobservable quantitative inputs used in determining the fair value of each investment property for the period ended December 31, 2013 include: a discount rate ranging from 5% to 9%; a capitalization rate ranging from 6.5% to 9.5%; stabilized occupancy rates ranging from 82% through 95%; and current market rental rates ranging from $3.40 per square foot to $12.50 per square foot. These inputs are based on the location, type and nature of each property, current and anticipated market conditions, and management’s knowledge and expertise in real estate. |
|
The Company’s estimated fair value of the investment properties in Minneapolis, Minnesota, Melville, New York and Seattle, Washington as of December 31, 2012 was based on a comparison of recent market activity and discounted cash flow models, which include estimates of property specific inflows and outflows over a specific holding period. Significant unobservable quantitative inputs used in determining the fair value of each investment include: discount rates ranging from 8% through 13%, a capitalization rate of 8.5%, stabilized occupancy rates ranging from 82% through 93% and current market rental rates ranging from $11.20 per square foot to $21.50 per square foot. These inputs are based on the location, type and nature of each property, current and anticipated market conditions and management’s knowledge and expertise in real estate. |