SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Described below are certain of the Company’s significant accounting policies. The disclosures regarding several of the policies have been condensed or omitted in accordance with interim reporting regulations specified by Form 10-Q. Please see the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 for a complete listing of all of its significant accounting policies. Basis of Presentation The condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q include the accounts of Hines REIT, the Operating Partnership and the Operating Partnership’s wholly-owned subsidiaries as well as the related amounts of noncontrolling interests. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. As a result of the adoption of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2015-02, the Company has determined that the Operating Partnership is considered a VIE. However, the Company meets the disclosure exemption criteria under ASU 2015-02, as the Company is the primary beneficiary of the VIE and the Company’s partnership interest is considered a majority voting interest. The Company has retroactively changed, for all prior periods presented, its classification of distributions in the consolidated balance sheets and statements of equity by reflecting such distributions as charges against “accumulated distributions in excess of earnings.” This presentation change had no impact on the total equity balances in any of the periods presented. The Company’s investments in partially-owned real estate joint ventures and partnerships are reviewed for impairment periodically. The Company will record an impairment charge if it determines that a decline in the value of an investment below its carrying value is other than temporary. The Company’s analysis will be dependent on a number of factors, including the performance of each investment, current market conditions, and its intent and ability to hold the investment to full recovery. Based on the Company’s analysis of the facts and circumstances at each reporting period, no impairment was recorded related to its investment in the Core Fund for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 . However, if market conditions deteriorate in the future and result in lower valuations or reduced cash flows of the Company’s remaining investment in the Core Fund, impairment charges may be recorded in future periods. International Operations In addition to its properties in the United States, the Company has owned investments in Canada and Brazil, although the Company no longer owns any operating investments outside the United States as of September 30, 2016 . Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of September 30, 2016 is related to the remaining non-operating net assets of the disposed directly-owned properties in Brazil and Canada. Assets Held for Sale and Associated Liabilities Held for Sale In June 2016, the Company’s board of directors approved the Plan of Liquidation. In addition, as of September 30, 2016 , all of the Company’s directly-held properties were under contract to sell, except for a property which was being marketed for sale as of that date and now is sold as of the date of this filing. The Company determined that the West Coast Assets were a disposal group, as they were under contract to sell in one transaction to the same buyer. Accordingly, as of September 30, 2016, the Company determined that all of its directly-owned properties and their related assets and associated liabilities were classified as held for sale as of September 30, 2016 . At December 31, 2015, no assets were classified as held for sale by the Company. As of September 30, 2016 , assets held for sale consisted of the following (in thousands): September 30, 2016 Investment property, net $ 1,060,608 Restricted cash 2,668 Tenant and other receivables, net 18,967 Intangible lease assets, net 77,978 Deferred leasing costs, net 75,579 Deferred financing costs, net 312 Other assets 2,430 Total assets held for sale $ 1,238,542 As of September 30, 2016 , liabilities associated with assets held for sale consisted of the following (in thousands): September 30, 2016 Accounts payable and accrued expenses $ 33,857 Intangible lease liabilities, net 13,124 Other liabilities 15,140 Total liabilities associated with assets held for sale $ 62,121 As of June 30, 2016, the Company determined that all of its directly-owned properties were classified as held for sale, therefore, no depreciation and amortization were recorded on these assets for the three months ended September 30, 2016 . Impairment of Investment Property Real estate assets are reviewed for impairment in each reporting period if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the individual property may not be recoverable. In such an event, a comparison will be made of the current and projected cash flows of each property on an undiscounted basis to the carrying amount of such property. If undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount, such carrying amount would be adjusted, if necessary, to estimated fair values to reflect impairment in the value of the asset. As of September 30, 2016 , all assets are held for sale and impairment is assessed by comparing the carrying amount of the long-lived asset or disposal group, as applicable, to the fair value less cost to sell. If the carrying amount is greater than the fair value less cost to sell, the asset value is considered impaired, and the carrying amount is written down to the fair value less cost to sell. See Note 13 — Fair Value Disclosures for additional information regarding the Company’s policy for determining fair values of its investment properties. For the three months ended September 30, 2016, the Company determined that three of its directly-owned properties located in Dallas, Texas, Houston, Texas and Bellevue, Washington were impaired because such assets were classified as held for sale and their carrying values exceeded their fair values less cost to sell primarily due to reduced purchase price or increased closing costs. As a result, impairment losses were recorded related to those properties of $6.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 . The property located in Dallas, Texas was sold in August 2016. See Note 3 — Real Estate Investments — Property Sales for more information. Additionally, for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 , the Company recorded impairment losses of $30.4 million on four of its directly-owned properties located in Melville, New York, Dallas, Texas, Houston, Texas and Bellevue, Washington because such assets were classified as held for sale and their carrying values exceeded their fair values less cost to sell. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 , the Company determined that two of its directly-owned properties located in Dallas, Texas and Melville, New York were impaired since the projected undiscounted cash flows for these properties were less than their carrying values. As a result, impairment losses of $16.0 million were recorded related to those properties for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 . During the three months ended September 30, 2016 , impairment losses of $30.6 million were recorded related to two of the Company's indirectly-owned properties located in Phoenix, Arizona and Woodland Hills, California. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016 , impairment losses of $66.6 million were recorded related to three of the Company’s indirectly-owned properties located in Phoenix, Arizona, Sacramento, California and Woodland Hills, California. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 , impairment losses of $16.7 million and $38.8 million were recorded related to one of the Company’s indirectly-owned properties located in Richmond, Virginia. The property located in Richmond, Virginia was sold in December 2015. See Note 5 — Investments in Unconsolidated Entities for additional information. Tenant and Other Receivables Receivable balances outstanding consist primarily of base rents, tenant reimbursements and receivables attributable to straight-line rent. An allowance for the uncollectible portion of tenant and other receivables is determined based upon an analysis of the tenant’s payment history, the financial condition of the tenant, business conditions in the industry in which the tenant operates and economic conditions in the area in which the property is located. Tenant and other receivables are shown at cost in the table above describing assets held for sale, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1.2 million at September 30, 2016 . Tenant and other receivables are shown at cost in the condensed consolidated balance sheets, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $4.1 million at December 31, 2015 . Deferred Leasing Costs As of June 30, 2016, the Company determined that all of its directly-owned properties were classified as held for sale, therefore, no depreciation and amortization were recorded on these assets for the three months ended September 30, 2016 . Tenant inducement amortization was $4.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and was recorded as an offset to rental revenue. In addition, the Company recorded $1.3 million as amortization expense related to other direct leasing costs for the three months ended September 30, 2015 . Tenant inducement amortization was $10.7 million and $12.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 , respectively, and was recorded as an offset to rental revenue. In addition, the Company recorded $3.2 million and $3.9 million as amortization expense related to other direct leasing costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 , respectively. Deferred Financing Costs Deferred financing costs consist of direct costs incurred in obtaining debt financing. These costs are presented as a direct reduction to the related debt liability for permanent mortgages and presented as an asset for revolving credit arrangements. In total, deferred financing costs were $0.3 million and $1.7 million as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 , respectively. These costs are amortized into interest expense on a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective interest method, over the terms of the obligations. For the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 , $0.7 million and $0.5 million , respectively, of deferred financing costs were amortized into interest expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 , $1.5 million and $1.7 million , respectively, of deferred financing costs were amortized into interest expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Other Assets Other assets included the following (in thousands): September 30, 2016 (1) December 31, 2015 Prepaid insurance $ 943 $ 663 Prepaid taxes 227 547 Other 1,260 1,357 Total $ 2,430 $ 2,567 (1) As of September 30, 2016 , these amounts were classified as held for sale. Revenue Recognition Rental payments are generally paid by the tenants prior to the beginning of each month. As of September 30, 2016 , the Company recorded liabilities of $6.3 million related to prepaid rental payments which were included in other liabilities in the table above describing liabilities associated with assets held for sale. As of December 31, 2015 , the Company recorded liabilities of $8.5 million related to prepaid rental payments which were included in other liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The Company recognizes rental revenue on a straight-line basis over the life of the lease including rent holidays, if any. Straight-line rent receivable was $16.2 million and $36.9 million as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 , respectively. Redemption of Common Stock Prior to its suspension as described below, the Company’s share redemption program generally limited the funds available for redemption to the amount of proceeds received from the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan in the prior quarter. The board of directors determined to waive this limitation of the share redemption program and fully honor all eligible requests received for the three months ended March 31, 2016, totaling $7.5 million , which amount was in excess of the $5.4 million received from the issuance of shares pursuant to the dividend reinvestment plan in the prior quarter. The board of directors determined to waive the limitation on the share redemption program and fully honor all eligible requests received for the year ended December 31, 2015 , totaling $31.4 million , which was in excess of the $ 21.9 million received from the dividend reinvestment plan in the prior quarters. The Company has recorded liabilities of $7.1 million in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2015 , related to shares that were tendered for redemption and approved by the board of directors but were not redeemed until the subsequent month. Such amounts have been included in redemption of common shares in the accompanying consolidated statements of equity based on a redemption price of $5.45 per share for ordinary share redemption requests and $6.50 per share for redemption requests in connection with the death or disability of a stockholder made during the first three quarters of 2015 and $6.65 per share for redemption requests in connection with the death or disability of a stockholder made during the fourth quarter of 2015 and first quarter of 2016. On May 31, 2016, the Company’s board of directors determined to suspend indefinitely the Company’s share redemption program, effective as of June 30, 2016. No liabilities related to the Company’s share redemption program were recorded in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the liabilities associated with assets held for sale as of September 30, 2016 . Recent Accounting Pronouncements In February 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued amendments to the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC” or the “Codification”) to provide guidance on consolidation evaluation for reporting organizations that are required to evaluate whether they should consolidate certain legal entities. These amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2015 and early adoption is permitted. The Company has evaluated the impact of the adoption of these amendments on its consolidated financial statements and has determined that the Company’s operating partnership is considered a VIE. However, the Company meets the disclosure exemption criteria, as the Company is the primary beneficiary of the VIE and the Company’s partnership interest is considered a majority voting interest. The Company has also determined that the Core Fund will be considered to be a VIE as a result of this new guidance. However, the Company will not consolidate the Core Fund since the Company is not the primary beneficiary. In September 2015, the FASB issued new guidance that eliminates the requirement that an acquirer in a business combination account for measurement-period adjustments retrospectively. Pursuant to the new guidance, an acquirer will recognize a measurement-period adjustment during the period in which it determines the amount of the adjustment. This new guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2015 and early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this new guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements. In June 2016, the FASB issued new guidance that requires the impairment of financial instruments to be based on expected credit losses. These amendments are effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2019 and early adoption is permitted for years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently assessing the impact the adoption of this guidance will have on its financial statements. In August 2016, the FASB issued amendments to the Codification to add or clarify guidance on the classification of certain cash receipts and payments in the statement of cash flows. The amendments in the ASU are effective for public entities for annual and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and for all other entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and early adoption is permitted. The Company does not believe the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on its financial statements. |