UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2005
Commission file number: 000-50543
PORTEC RAIL PRODUCTS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
West Virginia | 55-0755271 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
900 Old Freeport Road, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania | 15238-8250 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(412) 782-6000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YESþ NOo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YESo NOþ
As of July 31, 2005, there were 9,601,779 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.
PORTEC RAIL PRODUCTS, INC.
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
2
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Portec Rail Products, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
June 30 | December 31 | |||||||
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | (Audited) | |||||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||||
Assets | ||||||||
Current assets | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 3,338 | $ | 7,749 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net | 14,634 | 12,452 | ||||||
Inventories, net | 18,824 | 18,814 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 2,299 | 895 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 561 | 762 | ||||||
Total current assets | $ | 39,656 | $ | 40,672 | ||||
Property, plant and equipment, net | 12,159 | 12,660 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $355 and $51 at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively | 23,691 | 24,185 | ||||||
Goodwill | 10,849 | 10,957 | ||||||
Other assets | 215 | 151 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 86,570 | $ | 88,625 | ||||
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity | ||||||||
Current liabilities | ||||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt | $ | 3,079 | $ | 3,611 | ||||
Accounts payable | 6,342 | 6,417 | ||||||
Accrued income taxes | 671 | 503 | ||||||
Customer deposits | 1,127 | 1,572 | ||||||
Accrued compensation | 1,195 | 1,484 | ||||||
Other accrued liabilities | 2,278 | 1,824 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 14,692 | 15,411 | ||||||
Long-term debt, less current maturities | 12,017 | 14,108 | ||||||
Accrued pension costs | 2,663 | 2,829 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 8,382 | 8,889 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities | 395 | 344 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 38,149 | 41,581 | ||||||
Commitments and Contingencies | — | — | ||||||
Shareholders’ equity: | ||||||||
Common stock, $1 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized, 9,601,779 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively | 9,602 | 9,602 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 25,290 | 25,290 | ||||||
Retained earnings | 15,274 | 13,521 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (1,745 | ) | (1,369 | ) | ||||
Total shareholders’ equity | 48,421 | 47,044 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 86,570 | $ | 88,625 | ||||
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
3
Portec Rail Products, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30 | June 30 | |||||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data) | ||||||||||||||||
Net sales | $ | 24,086 | $ | 18,513 | $ | 44,907 | $ | 33,706 | ||||||||
Cost of sales | 16,311 | 13,083 | 30,610 | 24,405 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit | 7,775 | 5,430 | 14,297 | 9,301 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative | 5,050 | 3,281 | 9,744 | 6,115 | ||||||||||||
Amortization expense | 173 | 16 | 340 | 32 | ||||||||||||
Operating income | 2,552 | 2,133 | 4,213 | 3,154 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense | 209 | 25 | 472 | 71 | ||||||||||||
Other expense (income), net | 36 | (51 | ) | (35 | ) | (33 | ) | |||||||||
Income before income taxes | 2,307 | 2,159 | 3,776 | 3,116 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 599 | 695 | 1,063 | 995 | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 1,708 | $ | 1,464 | $ | 2,713 | $ | 2,121 | ||||||||
Earnings per share | ||||||||||||||||
Basic and diluted | $ | .18 | $ | .17 | $ | .28 | $ | .25 | ||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding | ||||||||||||||||
Basic and diluted | 9,601,779 | 8,602,169 | 9,601,779 | 8,602,169 | ||||||||||||
Dividends per share | $ | .05 | $ | .05 | $ | .10 | $ | .10 |
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
4
Portec Rail Products, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30 | ||||||||
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||||
Operating Activities | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 2,713 | $ | 2,121 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 1,179 | 728 | ||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts | 7 | 46 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts receivable | (2,872 | ) | (3,187 | ) | ||||
Inventories | (292 | ) | (204 | ) | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets | (1,601 | ) | 391 | |||||
Accounts payable | 473 | 257 | ||||||
Income taxes payable | 183 | (10 | ) | |||||
Accrued expenses | (171 | ) | 455 | |||||
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities | (381 | ) | 597 | |||||
Investing Activities | ||||||||
Purchases of property, plant and equipment | (768 | ) | (309 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of assets | — | 13 | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (768 | ) | (296 | ) | ||||
Financing Activities | ||||||||
Net decrease in revolving credit agreements | (413 | ) | (5,834 | ) | ||||
Principal payments on bank term loans | (1,832 | ) | (2,005 | ) | ||||
Principal payments to Boone County Bank, Inc. (related party) | — | (74 | ) | |||||
Principal payments on capital leases | (13 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||
Cash dividends paid to shareholders | (960 | ) | (862 | ) | ||||
Issuance of common stock | — | 17,972 | ||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (3,218 | ) | 9,192 | |||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | (44 | ) | 7 | |||||
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | (4,411 | ) | 9,500 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 7,749 | 418 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 3,338 | $ | 9,918 | ||||
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information | ||||||||
Cash paid during the period for: | ||||||||
Interest | $ | 557 | $ | 67 | ||||
Income taxes | $ | 1,161 | $ | 1,075 | ||||
Capital lease obligation incurred for equipment | — | $ | 16 | |||||
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
5
Portec Rail Products, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
Note 1: Organization
Portec Rail Products, Inc. (sometimes herein referred to as “we”, “our”, “us”, the “Company”, or “Portec Rail Products”) was incorporated in West Virginia in 1997. We manufacture, supply and distribute a broad range of rail products, including rail joints, rail anchors, rail spikes, railway friction management products and systems, railway wayside data collection and data management systems and freight car securement devices. We also manufacture material handling equipment through our United Kingdom operation. We serve both the domestic and international markets. Our five manufacturing facilities are located in Huntington, West Virginia; St. Jean, Quebec, Canada; Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Wrexham, Wales, United Kingdom; and Leicester, England, United Kingdom. We also have an engineering and assembly facility located in Dublin, Ohio, and have offices near Chicago, Illinois; Montreal, Quebec, Canada, and Birmingham, England, United Kingdom. Our corporate headquarters is located near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Note 2: Basis of Presentation
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Portec Rail Products, Inc.; Salient Systems, Inc. (Salient Systems), our wholly-owned United States subsidiary; 3094497 Nova Scotia Company, our wholly-owned Canadian subsidiary (Nova Scotia); and Portec Rail Products (UK) Ltd., our wholly-owned United Kingdom subsidiary (United Kingdom). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The foregoing financial information has been prepared in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in the United Sates of America (“GAAP”) and rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for interim financial reporting. The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The accompanying interim financial information is unaudited; however, we believe that the financial information reflects all adjustments (consisting of items of a normal recurring nature) necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with GAAP. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in our annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The balance sheet information as of December 31, 2004 was derived from our audited balance sheet included in our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Unless otherwise indicated, all dollar amounts are in U.S. dollars.
Certain amounts in the prior year’s consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on net earnings.
Note 3: Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method for all inventories. Inventory costs include material, labor and manufacturing overhead.
The major components of inventories are as follows:
June 30 | December 31 | |||||||
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||||
Raw materials | $ | 8,589 | $ | 8,972 | ||||
Work in process | 421 | 357 | ||||||
Finished goods | 10,327 | 9,822 | ||||||
19,337 | 19,151 | |||||||
Less reserve for slow-moving and obsolete inventory | 513 | 337 | ||||||
Net inventory | $ | 18,824 | $ | 18,814 | ||||
6
Portec Rail Products, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
Note 4: Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt consists of the following:
June 30 | December 31 | |||||||
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||||
National City Bank Credit Facility:(a) | ||||||||
Term loan facility | $ | 13,211 | $ | 14,710 | ||||
Revolving credit facility – United States | — | — | ||||||
Revolving credit facility – Canada | — | 834 | ||||||
United Kingdom loans:(b) | ||||||||
Term loan | — | 211 | ||||||
Property loan | — | 137 | ||||||
Quodeck acquisition loan | — | 320 | ||||||
Overdraft credit facility | — | — | ||||||
Kelsan overdraft credit facility(c) | 718 | 325 | ||||||
Salient Systems promissory notes(d) | 1,120 | 1,120 | ||||||
Capitalized lease obligations | 47 | 62 | ||||||
15,096 | 17,719 | |||||||
Less current maturities | 3,079 | 3,611 | ||||||
$ | 12,017 | $ | 14,108 | |||||
(a) National City Bank Credit Facility
On November 30, 2004, we entered into a $25.0 million term loan and revolving credit facility with National City Bank and its Canadian affiliate that provided acquisition financing in addition to supporting the working capital requirements of our United States business units and our Canadian operation near Montreal. Under this agreement, there are three separate borrowing components, a $7.0 million United States revolving credit facility, a $3.1 million ($3.75 million Canadian dollars) revolving credit facility for our Canadian operation near Montreal, and an outstanding term loan of $13.2 million. As of June 30, 2005, we had the ability to borrow $10.1 million under the revolving credit facilities, as the combined borrowings under the total facility cannot exceed $25.0 million. This agreement contains certain financial covenants that require us to maintain cash flow coverage and leverage ratios as well as maintaining minimum amounts of tangible net worth. This credit facility further limits capital expenditures, sales of assets, and additional indebtedness. We were in compliance with all of these financial covenants as of June 30, 2005.
National City Bank (Canada) Term Loan Facility:
To finance the acquisition of Kelsan Technologies Corp. (“Kelsan”) on November 30, 2004 we borrowed $17.6 million Canadian dollars ($14.9 million U.S.) under the term loan facility through 3094497 Nova Scotia Company (“Nova Scotia”). Nova Scotia is the borrower of the funds under the credit agreement, and Portec Rail Products, Inc. is the sole guarantor of the term loan with substantially all of our United States assets pledged as collateral. Under this seven-year term loan, our monthly principal payments are $210,050 Canadian dollars ($171,000 U.S.). We have the option to direct outstanding borrowings under a Canadian prime lending rate option, a Canadian Banker’s Acceptance Equivalent Note (“BA Note”) option, or utilize a combination of both of these options at our discretion. Interest rates under these options are the prevailing Canadian prime rate plus an applicable margin of 1.25% to 1.75% (prime rate option), or the BA Note interest rate plus an applicable margin of 2.25% to 2.75% (BA Note option). As of June 30, 2005, we had outstanding borrowings of $15.9 million Canadian dollars ($13.0 million U.S.) that were priced under the BA Note rate option at 5.06%, and
7
Portec Rail Products, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
$310,050 Canadian dollars ($253,000 U.S.) that were priced under the Canadian prime rate option at 5.75%. This term loan is scheduled to mature on November 30, 2011.
(b) United Kingdom Loans
Term Loan:
In connection with a plant expansion, our United Kingdom subsidiary entered into a £300,000 pounds sterling ($466,000 U.S.) term loan with a financial institution in the United Kingdom. The interest rate was the financial institution’s base rate plus 2.25%. The term loan was repayable in equal monthly installments and had an original scheduled maturity date of July 31, 2010. This loan was repaid in full during March 2005.
Property Loan:
In connection with the acquisition of Conveyors International Ltd., Torvale Fisher Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Portec Rail Products (UK) Ltd., entered into a property loan with a financial institution in the United Kingdom. This £400,000 pounds sterling ($664,000 U.S.) property loan was repayable in equal monthly installments and had an original scheduled maturity date of March 31, 2009. The interest rate was the financial institution’s base rate plus 2.25%. This loan was repaid in full during March 2005.
Quodeck Acquisition Loan:
In connection with the acquisition of the assets of Quodeck Ltd., our United Kingdom subsidiary entered into a £300,000 pounds sterling ($471,000 U.S.) term loan with a financial institution in the United Kingdom. The Quodeck acquisition loan was repayable in equal monthly installments beginning in September 2003 and had an original scheduled maturity date of September 10, 2006. The interest rate was the financial institution’s base rate plus 1.75%. This loan was repaid in full during April 2005.
Overdraft Credit Facility:
Our United Kingdom subsidiary has a £750,000 pounds sterling ($1.3 million U.S.) overdraft credit facility on its primary bank account with a financial institution in the United Kingdom to support its working capital requirements. This facility expires on March 19, 2006. The interest rate on the overdraft facility is the financial institution’s base rate plus 1.5%. For any borrowings in excess of £750,000 pounds sterling that the financial institution approves, the interest rate is the financial institution’s base rate plus 3.5%. As of June 30, 2005, the interest rate on this credit facility was 6.25% and there were no outstanding borrowings. The overdraft credit facility is secured with substantially all of the assets of Portec Rail Products (UK) Ltd. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries.
(c) Kelsan Overdraft Credit Facility
Kelsan Technologies Corp., our Vancouver, Canada subsidiary, has a $1.5 million Canadian dollar ($1.2 million U.S.) overdraft credit facility with a local financial institution to support its working capital requirements. This credit facility is secured by a general security agreement granting a first security interest on the majority of Kelsan’s assets. The interest rate is the Canadian prime rate plus 1.0%. As of June 30, 2005, outstanding borrowings were $880,000 Canadian dollars ($718,000 U.S.) and interest accrued at 5.25%. This credit facility is due upon demand, and borrowings under this facility are included in current maturities of long-term debt. This credit facility is reviewed on an annual basis and has a current maturity date of December 31, 2005.
(d) Salient Systems Promissory Notes
In connection with the acquisition of Salient Systems on September 30, 2004, we executed two promissory notes. One promissory note was executed with Harold Harrison, the founder and former President and Chief Executive Officer of Salient Systems. This promissory note, in the aggregate principal amount of $1,064,000 is due to Mr. Harrison in four
8
Portec Rail Products, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
equal, annual installments of $266,000 beginning January 3, 2006 and ending January 3, 2009. A second promissory note was executed with Falls River Group, LLC, which acted as a financial advisor to Salient Systems. This promissory note, in the aggregate principal amount of $56,000 is due to Falls River Group, LLC in four equal, annual installments of $14,000 beginning January 3, 2006 and ending January 3, 2009. The unpaid principal balance of the promissory notes accrues interest at the prime rate as published in theWall Street Journal. All accrued and unpaid interest is payable annually beginning January 3, 2006. The outstanding balance on the promissory notes accrued interest at 6.25% as of June 30, 2005. As of June 30, 2005, we had accrued interest expense of $46,000 related to these promissory notes.
Note 5: Retirement Plans
In December 2003, the FASB issued revisions to SFAS 132,Employer’s Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits. The revised statement includes new and revised disclosures for sponsors of defined benefit plans. The revised disclosure rules require interim presentation of net periodic benefit cost recognized, showing the component amounts separately. The revised disclosure rules also have requirements regarding interim disclosure of employer contributions paid and expected to be paid, and are effective for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2003 for both domestic and foreign plans. The following defined benefit plans’ disclosures incorporate these requirements.
The components of our net periodic pension (benefit)/cost related to our United States defined benefit pension plan are as follows for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30 | June 30 | |||||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Service cost | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Interest cost | 130 | 128 | 260 | 256 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | (170 | ) | (178 | ) | (340 | ) | (356 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of unrecognized loss | 12 | — | 24 | — | ||||||||||||
Pension (benefit)/cost | $ | (28 | ) | $ | (50 | ) | $ | (56 | ) | $ | (100 | ) | ||||
During 2005, we anticipate that no contributions will be made to this pension plan. In February 2004, as required under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), we contributed the required minimum payment of approximately $147,000 to this pension plan.
The components of net periodic pension cost/(benefit) of our United Kingdom defined benefit pension plans are as follows for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004:
Portec Rail | Conveyors | Portec Rail | Conveyors | |||||||||||||
Plan | Plan | Plan | Plan | |||||||||||||
2005 | 2005 | 2004 | 2004 | |||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Service cost | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Interest cost | 77 | 11 | 69 | 10 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | (73 | ) | (18 | ) | (70 | ) | (17 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of transition amount | (13 | ) | (3 | ) | (13 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of unrecognized loss (gain) | 30 | (3 | ) | 19 | (1 | ) | ||||||||||
Pension cost/(benefit) | $ | 21 | $ | (13 | ) | $ | 5 | $ | (11 | ) | ||||||
9
Portec Rail Products, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
The components of net periodic pension cost/(benefit) of our United Kingdom defined benefit pension plans are as follows for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004:
Portec Rail | Conveyors | Portec Rail | Conveyors | |||||||||||||
Plan | Plan | Plan | Plan | |||||||||||||
2005 | 2005 | 2004 | 2004 | |||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Service cost | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 28 | $ | — | ||||||||
Interest cost | 159 | 22 | 139 | 20 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | (150 | ) | (37 | ) | (146 | ) | (34 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of transition amount | (27 | ) | (5 | ) | (27 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of unrecognized loss (gain) | 62 | (6 | ) | 38 | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
Pension cost/(benefit) | $ | 44 | $ | (26 | ) | $ | 32 | $ | (22 | ) | ||||||
Our funding policy for the Portec Rail plan is to contribute the greater of £12,000 pounds sterling ($22,000 U.S.) or the minimum annual contribution required by applicable regulations. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, £3,000 and £6,000 pounds sterling, respectively, ($6,000 and $11,000 U.S.) in employer contributions have been made to the Portec Rail plan. For the remainder of 2005, we anticipate making additional contributions of £6,000 pounds sterling ($11,000 U.S.), plus the payment of certain plan administrative expenses, to the Portec Rail pension plan. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, we have not made any employer contributions to the Conveyors plan, nor do we anticipate making any employer contributions to the Conveyors plan for the remainder of 2005.
Note 6: Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 is as follows:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30 | June 30 | |||||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 1,708 | $ | 1,464 | $ | 2,713 | $ | 2,121 | ||||||||
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of tax | 88 | 15 | 113 | (24 | ) | |||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax | (373 | ) | (163 | ) | (488 | ) | (56 | ) | ||||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 1,423 | $ | 1,316 | $ | 2,338 | $ | 2,041 | ||||||||
Note 7: Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share (EPS) is computed as net income available to common shareholders divided by the weighted average common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share considers the potential dilution that occurs related to issuance of common stock under stock option plans. At the present time, we do not have any stock option plans or other instruments that would cause dilution.
10
Portec Rail Products, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
Note 8: Commitments and Contingencies
Contractual Obligations
The following is a summary of our contractual obligations as of June 30, 2005, due on a calendar year basis:
More | ||||||||||||||||||||
Less | 1 – 3 | 3 – 5 | than 5 | |||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations | Total | than 1 year | years | years | years | |||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Long term debt | $ | 14,331 | $ | 1,029 | $ | 4,676 | $ | 4,675 | $ | 3,951 | ||||||||||
Future interest payments for long-term debt obligations (1) | 2,285 | 402 | 1,096 | 611 | 176 | |||||||||||||||
Revolving credit facilities | 718 | 718 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Capital leases | 47 | 11 | 35 | 1 | — | |||||||||||||||
Operating leases | 4,114 | 528 | 2,043 | 735 | 808 | |||||||||||||||
Total contractual obligations | $ | 21,495 | $ | 2,688 | $ | 7,850 | $ | 6,022 | $ | 4,935 | ||||||||||
(1) | Assumes that the interest rates on our long-term debt agreements at June 30, 2005 (See Note 4 of the consolidated financial statements of Form 10-Q) will continue for the life of the agreements. |
Litigation
We are involved from time to time in lawsuits that arise in the normal course of business. We actively and vigorously defend all lawsuits. We have been named with numerous other defendants in an environmental lawsuit. The plaintiff seeks to recover costs which it has incurred, and may continue to incur, to investigate and remediate its former property as required by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC). We have not been named as a liable party by the NYSDEC and believe we have no liability to the plaintiff in the case. We filed a motion for summary judgment seeking a ruling to have us dismissed from the case. In November 2003 the motion for summary judgment was granted and we were dismissed from the case by the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. In March 2004, the plaintiff filed a notice of appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, appealing, in part, the District Court’s decision to dismiss all claims against us. In April 2005, the plaintiff’s appeal was dismissed by the Second Circuit Court without prejudice, and the matter was remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York for consideration in light of a recent United States Supreme Court decision. As of July 2005, all briefs addressing this recent Supreme Court decision have been filed by the parties and oral argument has been scheduled or August 2005. Once the District Court decides this issue upon remand, we expect the plaintiff will again appeal to the Second Circuit. Ongoing litigation may be protracted, and we may incur additional ongoing legal expenses, which are not estimable at this time.
Note 9: Segment Information
We operate four business segments consisting of Railway Maintenance Products Division (RMP), Shipping Systems Division (SSD), 3094497 Nova Scotia Company (Canada) and Portec Rail Products (UK) Ltd. (United Kingdom), along with a corporate functional shared service. The presentation of segment information reflects the manner in which we organize and manage our segments by geographic areas for making operating decisions, assessing performance and allocating resources.
Intersegment sales are accounted for at arm’s-length prices, reflecting prevailing market conditions within the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. Such sales and associated costs are eliminated in the consolidated financial statements. Salient Systems was acquired on September 30, 2004, and is operated under the RMP segment. Since the
11
Portec Rail Products, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
acquisition date, all assets and liabilities of Salient Systems, and the results of operations for Salient Systems, have been included in the RMP segment and the consolidated financial statements. In conjunction with the Kelsan acquisition in November 2004, and to provide the most advantageous tax benefits under both Canadian and United States income tax laws, we established a new Canadian subsidiary, 3094497 Nova Scotia Company, and transferred ownership of Portec, Rail Products Ltd., our Canadian subsidiary, to 3094497 Nova Scotia Company. Kelsan was acquired on November 30, 2004, and is operated under the Canada segment. Since the acquisition date, all assets and liabilities of Kelsan, and the results of operations for Kelsan, have been included in the Canada segment and the consolidated financial statements.
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30 | June 30 | |||||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
External Sales | ||||||||||||||||
RMP | $ | 11,403 | $ | 8,455 | $ | 20,762 | $ | 16,320 | ||||||||
SSD | 1,544 | 1,235 | 2,877 | 1,937 | ||||||||||||
Canada | 8,007 | 4,862 | 14,697 | 8,704 | ||||||||||||
United Kingdom | 3,132 | 3,961 | 6,571 | 6,745 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 24,086 | $ | 18,513 | $ | 44,907 | $ | 33,706 | ||||||||
Intersegment Sales | ||||||||||||||||
RMP | $ | 519 | $ | 500 | $ | 1,035 | $ | 765 | ||||||||
SSD | 3 | — | 3 | — | ||||||||||||
Canada | 1,783 | 475 | 2,424 | 896 | ||||||||||||
United Kingdom | 7 | 21 | 32 | 27 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 2,312 | $ | 996 | $ | 3,494 | $ | 1,688 | ||||||||
Total Sales | ||||||||||||||||
RMP | $ | 11,922 | $ | 8,955 | $ | 21,797 | $ | 17,085 | ||||||||
SSD | 1,547 | 1,235 | 2,880 | 1,937 | ||||||||||||
Canada | 9,790 | 5,337 | 17,121 | 9,600 | ||||||||||||
United Kingdom | 3,139 | 3,982 | 6,603 | 6,772 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 26,398 | $ | 19,509 | $ | 48,401 | $ | 35,394 | ||||||||
12
Portec Rail Products, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30 | June 30 | |||||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Operating Income (Loss) | ||||||||||||||||
RMP | $ | 1,675 | $ | 1,259 | $ | 2,780 | $ | 2,337 | ||||||||
SSD | 294 | 198 | 501 | 217 | ||||||||||||
Canada | 1,149 | 793 | 1,828 | 1,217 | ||||||||||||
United Kingdom | 137 | 346 | 352 | 165 | ||||||||||||
Corporate | (703 | ) | (463 | ) | (1,248 | ) | (782 | ) | ||||||||
Total | 2,552 | 2,133 | 4,213 | 3,154 | ||||||||||||
Interest Expense | 209 | 25 | 472 | 71 | ||||||||||||
Other Expense (Income), net | 36 | (51 | ) | (35 | ) | (33 | ) | |||||||||
Income Before Income Taxes | $ | 2,307 | $ | 2,159 | $ | 3,776 | $ | 3,116 | ||||||||
Depreciation and Amortization | ||||||||||||||||
RMP | $ | 181 | $ | 160 | $ | 359 | $ | 318 | ||||||||
SSD | 2 | 3 | 4 | 6 | ||||||||||||
Canada | 286 | 80 | 565 | 161 | ||||||||||||
United Kingdom | 122 | 120 | 242 | 241 | ||||||||||||
Corporate | 7 | 1 | 9 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 598 | $ | 364 | $ | 1,179 | $ | 728 | ||||||||
Capital Expenditures | ||||||||||||||||
RMP | $ | 296 | $ | 84 | $ | 403 | $ | 235 | ||||||||
SSD | — | — | — | 2 | ||||||||||||
Canada | 80 | 11 | 175 | 34 | ||||||||||||
United Kingdom | 45 | 44 | 106 | 54 | ||||||||||||
Corporate | 63 | — | 84 | — | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 484 | $ | 139 | $ | 768 | $ | 325 | ||||||||
June 30 | December 31 | |||||||
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
(In Thousands) | (In Thousands) | |||||||
Total Assets | ||||||||
RMP | $ | 40,108 | $ | 40,060 | ||||
SSD | 1,851 | 1,699 | ||||||
Canada | 32,292 | 32,504 | ||||||
United Kingdom | 9,905 | 10,532 | ||||||
Corporate | 2,414 | 3,830 | ||||||
Total | $ | 86,570 | $ | 88,625 | ||||
13
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements of Portec Rail Products, Inc. and the related notes beginning on page 3. Unless otherwise specified, any reference to the “three months ended” or “six months ended” is to the three or six months ended June 30. Additionally, when used in this Form 10-Q, unless the context requires otherwise, the terms “we,” “our” and “us” refer to Portec Rail Products, Inc. and its business segments.
Cautionary Statement Relevant to Forward-looking Statements
This Form 10-Q contains or incorporates by reference forward-looking statements relating to the Company. Forward-looking statements typically are identified by the use of terms, such as “may,” “will,” “plan,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “if,” “estimate,” “intend,” and similar words, although some forward-looking statements are expressed differently. You should consider statements that contain these and similar words carefully because they describe our expectations, plans, strategies, goals and beliefs concerning future business conditions, our results of operations, our financial position, and our business outlook, or state other “forward-looking” information based on currently available information. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. We undertake no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements. You should not place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements.
The Company identifies below important factors that could affect the Company’s financial performance and could cause the Company’s actual results for future periods to differ materially from any opinions or statements expressed with respect to future periods in any current statements. In particular, the Company’s future results could be affected by a variety of factors, such as:
• | customer demand; | ||
• | competitive dynamics in the North American and worldwide railroad and railway supply industries; | ||
• | capital expenditures by the railway industry in North America and worldwide; | ||
• | economic conditions, including changes in inflation rates or interest rates; | ||
• | product development and the success of new products; | ||
• | our ability to successfully pursue, consummate and integrate attractive acquisition opportunities; | ||
• | changes in laws and regulations; | ||
• | the development and retention of sales representation and distribution agreements with third parties; | ||
• | limited international protection of our intellectual property; | ||
• | the loss of key personnel; | ||
• | fluctuations in the cost and availability of raw materials and supplies, and any significant disruption of supplies; | ||
• | foreign economic conditions, including currency rate fluctuations; | ||
• | political unrest in foreign markets and economic uncertainty due to terrorism or war; | ||
• | exposure to pension liabilities; | ||
• | seasonal fluctuations in our sales; | ||
• | technological innovations by our competitors; and | ||
• | the importation of lower cost competitive products into our markets. |
The Company specifically declines to undertake any obligation to publicly revise any forward-looking statements that have been made to reflect events or circumstances after the date of those statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.
14
Overview
In the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom, we manufacture, supply and distribute a broad range of rail products, including rail joints, rail anchors, rail spikes, railway friction management products and systems, railway wayside data collection and data management systems and freight car securement devices. End users of our rail products include Class I railroads, short-line and regional railroads and transit systems. Our three North American business segments along with the rail division of our United Kingdom business segment serve these end users. In addition, our United Kingdom business segment manufactures and supplies material handling products primarily to end users within the United Kingdom. These products include overhead and floor conveyor systems, racking systems and mezzanine flooring systems. The end users of our material handling products are primarily in the manufacturing, distribution, garment and food industries.
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2004
Net Sales.Net sales increased to $24.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005, an increase of $5.6 million or 30.3%, from $18.5 million for the comparable period in 2004. This increase is primarily attributable to increased sales of $3.1 million at our Canadian operations, $2.9 million at RMP, and $309,000 at SSD, partially offset by lower sales of $829,000 at our United Kingdom operation. Net sales for Canada were positively impacted by the acquisition of Kelsan in November 2004, which added $1.5 million in new sales during the second quarter of 2005. Additionally, increased customer demand across all major product lines at our operation near Montreal added an additional $1.1 million of sales during the three months ended June 30, 2005. Foreign currency translation of Canadian dollars into U.S. dollars also favorably impacted sales in the current period by approximately $523,000. Net sales at RMP increased $2.9 million during the second quarter of 2005, primarily due to increased customer demand for our rail joints and related products and friction management products, which resulted in $2.1 million of combined additional sales. Included in the rail joints and related products sales increase is $484,000 related to steel surcharges being a pass-through cost to our customers. Additionally, net sales for Salient Systems added $794,000 of new sales for RMP during the second quarter of 2005. Net sales at SSD increased $309,000 during the second quarter of 2005, due to increased sales of our auto rack load securement systems, primarily newly designed and standard bridge plates. Net sales at our United Kingdom operation were $829,000 lower during the current period, primarily due to lower customer demand for our material handling products, as these products are dependent on capital spending by original equipment manufacturers.
Gross Profit.Gross profit increased to $7.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005, an increase of $2.4 million or 44.4%, from $5.4 million for the comparable period in 2004. This increase is primarily due to the acquisitions of Kelsan and Salient Systems, which added $1.2 million and $488,000 of gross profit, respectively, during the second quarter of 2005. Gross profit at our Canadian operation near Montreal increased $483,000, of which $346,000 resulted from the increased sales volume of our products, primarily rail spikes and friction management products and services, along with a favorable foreign currency translation of $137,000. Additionally, increased sales of our rail joints and related products, along our with friction management products, contributed an additional $438,000 of gross profit at RMP, while gross profit at our United Kingdom operation was $350,000 lower during the three months ended June 30, 2005, primarily due to lower demand for our material handling products.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.Selling, general and administrative expenses increased to $5.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005, an increase of $1.7 million or 51.5%, from $3.3 million for the comparable period in 2004. This increase is primarily due to the acquisitions of Kelsan and Salient Systems, which have added $1.0 million and $410,000, respectively, of selling, general and administrative expenses during the second quarter of 2005. Corporate shared service expenses have increased $239,000 in the current period, primarily due to employee additions, increased professional fees, and employee salary and benefit increases. At our Canadian operation near Montreal, selling, general and administrative expenses increased $115,000 in the current period, of which $72,000 is attributable to increased spending on expenses such as employee salaries and benefits and research and development expenses for our friction management product line, while approximately $43,000 is attributable to an unfavorable foreign currency translation. These increases have been partially offset by lower selling, general, and administrative expenses at our United Kingdom operation of $147,000, due primarily to reduced expenses such as professional fees and insurance, and lower sales commission expenses.
15
Amortization Expense.Amortization expense increased to $173,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2005, an increase of $157,000 from $16,000 for the comparable period in 2004. This increase is primarily due to amortization expense on intangible assets purchased and deferred financing fees incurred as a result of the Kelsan acquisition in November 2004. Amortization expense for these intangible assets amounted to $135,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2005.
Interest Expense.Interest expense increased to $209,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2005, an increase of $184,000 from $25,000 for the comparable period in 2004. This increase is primarily due to a $14.9 million term loan from National City Bank (Canada) obtained in November 2004, the proceeds of which were used to finance the acquisition of Kelsan, which added $167,000 of interest expense during the second quarter of 2005. Total long-term debt increased to $15.1 million at June 30, 2005, from $1.4 million at June 30, 2004.
Provision for Income Taxes.Provision for income taxes decreased to $599,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2005, from $695,000 for the comparable period in 2004. The effective tax rates on reported taxable income were 26.0% and 32.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Our consolidated effective tax rate reflects research and development tax credits received by our Canadian operations, which reduced income tax expense by $148,000 and $29,000, or 6.4% and 1.3% for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Net Income.Net income increased to $1.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005, an increase of $244,000 or 16.3%, from $1.5 million for the comparable period in 2004. Our basic and diluted net income per share increased to $.18 on average shares outstanding of 9,601,779 for the three months ended June 30, 2005, from $.17 on average shares outstanding of 8,602,169 for the three months ended June 30, 2004.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2004
Net Sales.Net sales increased to $44.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, an increase of $11.2 million or 33.2%, from $33.7 million for the comparable period in 2004. This increase is primarily attributable to increased sales of $6.0 million at our Canadian operations, $4.5 million at RMP, and $940,000 at SSD. Net sales at our Canadian operations were positively impacted by the acquisition of Kelsan in November 2004, which added $3.1 million of new sales during the first six months of 2005, along with increased sales of $2.0 million at our operation near Montreal, primarily due to increased customer demand across all major product lines. A favorable foreign currency translation of Canadian dollars into U.S. dollars also positively impacted Canadian sales by approximately $902,000. Net sales at RMP increased $4.5 million, primarily due to increased customer demand for our products, primarily rail joints and related products and friction management products, which resulted in $2.8 million of combined additional sales. Included in the rail joints and related products sales increase is $860,000 related to steel surcharges being a pass-through cost to our customers. Additionally, net sales for Salient Systems added $1.6 million of new sales for RMP during the first six months of 2005. Net sales at SSD increased $940,000 during the first six months of 2005, primarily due to sales of our auto rack load securement systems.
Gross Profit.Gross profit increased to $14.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, an increase of $5.0 million or 53.8%, from $9.3 million for the comparable period in 2004. This increase is primarily due to the acquisitions of Kelsan and Salient Systems, which added $2.2 million and $1.0 million of gross profit, respectively, during the first six months of 2005. Gross profit at our Canadian operation near Montreal increased $901,000, of which approximately $675,000 resulted from the increased sales volume across all major product lines, along with a favorable foreign currency translation of approximately $226,000. Additionally, increased sales of our products, primarily rail joints and related products, contributed an additional $491,000 of gross profit at RMP during the six months ended June 30, 2005. Gross profit at SSD increased $336,000, primarily due to increased sales of auto rack load securement systems for the six months ended June 30, 2005.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.Selling, general and administrative expenses increased to $9.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, an increase of $3.6 million or 59.0%, from $6.1 million for the comparable period in 2004. This increase is primarily due to the acquisitions of Kelsan and Salient Systems, which have added $2.0 million and $880,000, respectively, of selling, general and administrative expenses during the first six months of 2005. Corporate shared service expenses increased $465,000, primarily due to employee additions, employee salary and benefit increases, and increases in professional fees, primarily to support Sarbanes-Oxley compliance requirements. At our Canadian operation near Montreal, selling, general, and administrative expenses
16
increased $246,000, of which $166,000 is due to increased spending on expenses such as employee salaries and benefits, and research and development expenses to support product development in our friction management product line, along with an unfavorable foreign currency translation of approximately $80,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2005. At our United Kingdom operation, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $168,000 in the current period, due primarily to reduced expenses such as professional fees and insurance, and lower sales commission expenses.
Amortization Expense.Amortization expense increased to $340,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2005, an increase of $308,000 from $32,000 for the comparable period in 2004. This increase is primarily due to amortization expense on intangible assets purchased and deferred financing fees incurred as a result of the Kelsan acquisition in November 2004. Amortization expense for these intangible assets amounted to $273,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2005.
Interest Expense.Interest expense increased to $472,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2005, an increase of $401,000 from $71,000 for the comparable period in 2004. This increase is primarily due to a $14.9 million term loan from National City Bank (Canada) obtained in November 2004, the proceeds of which were used to finance the acquisition of Kelsan, which resulted in $364,000 of interest expense during the first six months of 2005. Total long-term debt increased to $15.1 million at June 30, 2005, from $1.4 million at June 30, 2004.
Provision for Income Taxes.Provision for income taxes increased to $1.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, from $995,000 for the comparable period in 2004. The effective tax rates on reported taxable income were 28.1 % and 31.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Our consolidated effective tax rate reflects research and development tax credits received by our Canadian operations, which reduced income tax expense by $196,000 and $54,000, or 5.2% and 1.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Net Income.Net income increased to $2.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, an increase of $592,000 or 28.2%, from $2.1 million for the comparable period in 2004. Our basic and diluted net income per share increased to $.28 on average shares outstanding of 9,601,779 for the six months ended June 30, 2005, from $.25 on average shares outstanding of 8,602,169 for the six months ended June 30, 2004.
Business Segment Review
We operate four business segments consisting of Railway Maintenance Products Division (RMP), Shipping Systems Division (SSD), 3094497 Nova Scotia Company (Canada) and Portec Rail Products (UK) Ltd. (United Kingdom), along with a corporate functional shared service. The presentation of segment information reflects the manner in which we organize and manage our segments by geographic areas for making operating decisions, assessing performance and allocating resources. Intersegment sales are accounted for at arm’s-length prices, reflecting prevailing market conditions within the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. Such sales and associated costs are eliminated in the consolidated financial statements. Salient Systems was acquired on September 30, 2004, and is operated under the RMP segment. Since the acquisition date, all assets and liabilities of Salient Systems, and the results of operations for Salient Systems, have been included in the RMP segment and the consolidated financial statements. In conjunction with the Kelsan acquisition in November 2004, and to provide the most advantageous tax benefits under both Canadian and United States income tax laws, we established a new Canadian subsidiary, 3094497 Nova Scotia Company, and transferred ownership of Portec, Rail Products Ltd., our Canadian subsidiary, to 3094497 Nova Scotia Company. Kelsan was acquired on November 30, 2004, and is operated under the Canada segment. Since the acquisition date, all assets and liabilities of Kelsan, and the results of operations for Kelsan, have been included in the Canada segment and the consolidated financial statements.
Railway Maintenance Products Division – “RMP”.Our RMP business segment manufactures and assembles track components and related products, friction management products, and wayside data collection and data management systems. We also provide services to railroads, transit systems and railroad contractors, and distribute and resell purchased track components and lubricants manufactured by third parties. Our manufactured and assembled track component and friction management products consist primarily of standard and insulated rail joints, friction management systems, and wayside data collection and data management systems. Our purchased and distributed products consist primarily of various lubricants. On September 30, 2004, we acquired Salient Systems, which designs, manufactures, and provides wayside measurement and detection products, services and support for
17
both the domestic and international railway transportation industry. Salient Systems’ equipment and software are engineered to enhance our rail customers’ equipment utilization by improving reliability and reducing maintenance expense. Since the acquisition date, the results of operations and related assets and liabilities for Salient Systems are included in this business segment.
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30 | June 30 | |||||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
External sales | $ | 11,403 | (2) | $ | 8,455 | $ | 20,762 | (2) | $ | 16,320 | ||||||
Intersegment sales | 519 | 500 | 1,035 | 765 | ||||||||||||
Operating income | 1,675 | (2) | 1,259 | 2,780 | (2) | 2,337 | ||||||||||
Sales by product line(1) | ||||||||||||||||
Rail joints and related products | $ | 6,063 | $ | 4,510 | $ | 11,656 | $ | 9,014 | ||||||||
Friction management products and services | 4,739 | 4,081 | 7,878 | 7,415 | ||||||||||||
Wayside data collection and data management systems | 830 | (2) | — | (3) | 1,683 | (2) | — | (3) | ||||||||
Other products and services | 290 | 364 | 580 | 656 | ||||||||||||
Total product and service sales | $ | 11,922 | $ | 8,955 | $ | 21,797 | $ | 17,085 | ||||||||
(1) | Includes intersegment sales. | |
(2) | Includes Salient Systems’ external sales of $794,000 and $1.6 million and operating income of $78,000 and $122,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively. | |
(3) | On an unaudited basis and before pro forma adjustments, Salient Systems’ net sales were $529,000 and $864,000, and operating income/(loss) was $20,000 and ($216,000) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively. The amounts listed in this footnote are not included in the RMP table above. |
For the three months ended June 30, 2005, external sales for RMP increased by $2.9 million or 34.1%, to $11.4 million from $8.5 million during the comparable period in 2004. This increase is primarily due to increased customer demand for our track component products, primarily rail joints and related products, and our friction management products, which combined contributed an additional $2.1 million in sales. Included in the rail joint and related products sales increase is $484,000 related to steel surcharges being a pass-through cost to our customers at no additional margin during the second quarter of 2005. Additionally, external sales for Salient Systems added $794,000 of new sales for RMP during the second quarter of 2005. Operating income for the three months ended June 30, 2005 increased to $1.7 million from $1.3 million for the comparable period in 2004, an increase of $416,000 or 32.0%, primarily due to gross profit on the additional sales volume as described above, partially offset by the selling, general and administrative expenses at Salient Systems of $410,000.
For the six months ended June 30, 2005, external sales for RMP increased by $4.5 million or 27.6%, to $20.8 million from $16.3 million during the comparable period in 2004. This increase is primarily due to increased customer demand for our track component products, primarily rail joints and related products, and our friction management products, which combined contributed an additional $2.8 million in sales. Included in the rail joint and related products sales increase is $860,000 related to steel surcharges being a pass-through cost to our customers at no additional margin during the six months ended June 30, 2005. Additionally, external sales for Salient Systems added $1.6 million of new sales for RMP during the six months ended June 30, 2005. Operating income for the six months ended June 30, 2005 increased to $2.8 million from $2.3 million for the comparable period in 2004, an increase of $443,000 or 19.3% primarily due to gross profit on the additional sales volume as described above, partially offset by the selling, general and administrative expenses at Salient Systems of $880,000.
18
Shipping Systems Division – “SSD”.SSD engineers and sells load securement systems to the railroad freight car market. These systems are used to secure a wide variety of products and lading onto freight cars.
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30 | June 30 | |||||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
External sales | $ | 1,544 | $ | 1,235 | $ | 2,877 | $ | 1,937 | ||||||||
Intersegment sales | 3 | — | 3 | — | ||||||||||||
Operating income | 294 | 198 | 501 | 217 | ||||||||||||
Sales by product line(1) | ||||||||||||||||
Auto rack load securement systems | $ | 456 | $ | — | $ | 975 | $ | 1 | ||||||||
Heavy duty load securement systems | 436 | 453 | 889 | 764 | ||||||||||||
All other load securement systems | 655 | 782 | 1,016 | 1,172 | ||||||||||||
Total product and service sales | $ | 1,547 | $ | 1,235 | $ | 2,880 | $ | 1,937 | ||||||||
(1) | Includes intersegment sales. |
For the three months ended June 30, 2005, external sales for SSD increased by $309,000 or 25.8%, to $1.5 million from $1.2 million during the comparable period in 2004. This increase is primarily due to increased sales of auto rack load securement systems, particularly our newly designed and standard bridge plates, as customer demand for this product line has increased significantly. Operating income for the three months ended June 30, 2005 increased to $294,000 from $198,000 during the comparable period in 2004, an increase of $96,000 or 48.5%, primarily due to the increased gross profit on sales of our auto rack load securement systems.
For the six months ended June 30, 2005, external sales for SSD increased by $940,000 or 49.5%, to $2.9 million from $1.9 million during the comparable period in 2004. This increase is primarily due to sales of our auto rack load securement systems, particularly our newly designed and standard bridge plates, as customer demand for this product line has increased significantly. Operating income for the six months ended June 30, 2005 increased to $501,000 from $217,000 during the comparable period in 2004, an increase of $284,000 or 130.9%, primarily due to the increased gross profit on sales of our auto rack load securement systems.
3094497 Nova Scotia Company – “Canada”.At our Canadian operation near Montreal, we manufacture rail anchors and rail spikes and assemble friction management products primarily for the two largest Canadian railroads. Rail anchors and spikes are devices to secure rails to the ties to restrain the movement of the rail tracks. On November 30, 2004 we acquired Kelsan, which operates a technology and manufacturing facility in Vancouver, British Columbia. Kelsan’s two primary product lines are stick lubrication and application systems and a liquid friction modifier, Keltrack®. Kelsan manufactures its stick and applicator systems in Vancouver and subcontracts its manufacturing of the Keltrack® product line. Since the acquisition date, the results of operations and related assets and liabilities for Kelsan have been included in this business segment.
19
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30 | June 30 | |||||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
External sales | $ | 8,007 | (2) | $ | 4,862 | $ | 14,697 | (2) | $ | 8,704 | ||||||
Intersegment sales | 1,783 | (3) | 475 | 2,424 | (3) | 896 | ||||||||||
Operating income | 1,149 | (2) | 793 | 1,828 | (2) | 1,217 | ||||||||||
Average translation rate of Canadian dollar to United States dollar | 0.8086 | 0.7432 | 0.8089 | 0.7460 | ||||||||||||
Sales by product line(1) | ||||||||||||||||
Rail anchors and spikes | $ | 5,495 | $ | 3,825 | $ | 10,110 | $ | 7,228 | ||||||||
Friction management products and services | 3,968 | (2) | 1,295 | (4) | 6,490 | (2) | 2,022 | (4) | ||||||||
Other products and services | 327 | 217 | 521 | 350 | ||||||||||||
Total product and service sales | $ | 9,790 | $ | 5,337 | $ | 17,121 | $ | 9,600 | ||||||||
(1) | Includes intersegment sales. | |
(2) | Includes Kelsan sales of $1.5 million and $3.1 million, and operating income of $123,000 and $229,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively. | |
(3) | Includes Kelsan intersegment sales of $330,000 and $426,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively. | |
(4) | On an unaudited basis and before pro forma adjustments, Kelsan’s net sales were $1.7 million and $4.4 million and operating income was $180,000 and $634,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively. The amounts listed in this footnote are not included in the Canada table above. |
For the three months ended June 30, 2005, external sales for Canada increased by $3.1 million or 63.3%, to $8.0 million from $4.9 million during the comparable period in 2004. This increase is primarily attributable to the acquisition of Kelsan, which added $1.5 million of new sales during the second quarter of 2005. Additionally, increased customer demand across all major product lines for our operation near Montreal added $1.1 million in external sales, while a favorable foreign currency translation of $523,000 also positively impacted sales in the current period. Operating income for the three months ended June 30, 2005 increased to $1.1 million from $793,000 during the comparable period in 2004, an increase of $356,000 or 44.9%. This increase is primarily due to the additional gross profit of $346,000 on the higher sales volume across all major product lines at our operation near Montreal, along with $123,000 of operating income from Kelsan. Additionally, operating income for Canada was positively impacted by a favorable foreign currency translation of approximately $93,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2005. Offsetting these increases in operating income was amortization expense of $135,000 on acquired intangible assets and deferred financing fees related to the Kelsan acquisition, along with increased selling, general and administrative expenses of approximately $72,000, primarily research and development expenses for our friction management product line, and higher employee salaries and benefits at our operation near Montreal.
For the six months ended June 30, 2005, external sales for Canada increased by $6.0 million or 69.0%, to $14.7 million from $8.7 million during the comparable period in 2004. This increase is primarily attributable to the acquisition of Kelsan in November 2004, which added $3.1 million of new sales during the six months ended June 30, 2005. Additionally, increased customer demand across all major product lines for our operation near Montreal added $2.0 million in external sales, along with a favorable foreign currency translation of Canadian dollars to U.S. dollars, which also positively impacted sales by approximately $902,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2005. Operating income increased to $1.8 million from $1.2 million during the comparable period in 2004, an increase of $611,000 or 50.9%, primarily due to the additional gross profit of $675,000 on the higher sales volume across all major product lines at our operation near Montreal, along with $229,000 of operating income from Kelsan for the six months ended June 30, 2005. Additionally, operating income for Canada was positively impacted by a favorable foreign currency translation of approximately $146,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2005. Offsetting these increases in operating income was amortization expense of $273,000 on acquired intangible assets and deferred financing fees related to the Kelsan acquisition, along with increased selling, general and administrative expenses of $166,000, primarily research and development expenses for our friction management product line, and higher employee salaries and benefits at our operation near Montreal.
20
Portec Rail Products (UK) Ltd. – “United Kingdom”.In the United Kingdom, we operate and serve our customers in two markets. The United Kingdom’s rail business is primarily driven by sales of friction management products and services to the United Kingdom passenger rail network. The United Kingdom’s material handling business includes product lines such as overhead and floor conveyor systems, racking systems and mezzanine flooring systems. The end users of our material handling products are primarily United Kingdom-based companies in the manufacturing, distribution, garment and food industries. These companies, primarily original equipment manufacturers, typically purchase our material handling products as part of their capital spending plans.
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30 | June 30 | |||||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
External sales | $ | 3,132 | $ | 3,961 | $ | 6,571 | $ | 6,745 | ||||||||
Intersegment sales | 7 | 21 | 32 | 27 | ||||||||||||
Operating income | 137 | 346 | 352 | 165 | ||||||||||||
Average translation rate of British pound sterling to United States dollar | 1.8517 | 1.8187 | 1.8687 | 1.8279 | ||||||||||||
Sales by product line(1) | ||||||||||||||||
Material handling products | $ | 2,164 | $ | 2,719 | $ | 4,415 | $ | 4,667 | ||||||||
Friction management products and services | 975 | 1,263 | 2,188 | 2,105 | ||||||||||||
Total product and service sales | $ | 3,139 | $ | 3,982 | $ | 6,603 | $ | 6,772 | ||||||||
(1) | Includes intersegment sales. |
For the three months ended June 30, 2005, external sales at our United Kingdom operation declined by $829,000 or 20.7%, to $3.1 million from $4.0 million during the comparable period in 2004. This decline is primarily attributable to a lower customer demand for both our material handling and friction management products during the second quarter of 2005. Operating income for the three months ended June 30, 2005 declined to $137,000 from $346,000 during the comparable period in 2004, a decrease of $209,000 or 60.4%. This decrease is primarily due to reduced gross profit of $350,000 on the lower sales volume, partially offset by lower selling, general, and administrative expenses of $147,000, due primarily to reduced expenses such as professional fees and insurance, and lower sales commission expenses.
For the six months ended June 30, 2005, external sales at our United Kingdom operation experienced a slight decline of $174,000 or 2.6%, to $6.6 million from $6.7 million during the comparable period in 2004. This decline is primarily attributable to a lower customer demand for our material handling products, as this product line is dependent on capital spending by original equipment manufacturers, partially offset by a favorable foreign currency translation of approximately $143,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2005. Operating income for the six months ended June 30, 2005 increased to $352,000 from $165,000 during the comparable period in 2004, an increase of $187,000 or 113.3%. This increase is primarily due to lower selling, general and administrative expenses of $168,000, due primarily to reduced expenses such as professional fees and insurance, and lower sales commission expenses.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our cash flow from operations is the primary source of financing for internal growth, capital expenditures, repayment of long-term obligations, dividends to our shareholders, and other commercial commitments. The most significant risk associated with our ability to generate sufficient cash flow from operations is the overall level of demand for our products. Our total cash balance is $3.3 million at June 30, 2005. We may use this cash for acquisitions, product line expansions, or other general corporate purposes. In addition to cash generated from operations, we have revolving and overdraft credit facilities in place to support the working capital needs of each of our business segments. We believe that our cash flow from operations and the ability to borrow additional cash under our credit and overdraft facilities along with our existing cash balances will be sufficient to meet our cash flow requirements and growth objectives over the next twelve months.
21
Cash Flow Analysis.During the six months ended June 30, 2005, we used $381,000 in cash from operating activities compared to generating $597,000 in cash from operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2004. Cash provided by operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2005 includes net income of $2.7 million, an increase of $592,000 from net income of $2.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2004. Depreciation and amortization expense was $1.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2005, an increase of $451,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2004, primarily due to amortization expense on intangible assets acquired in conjunction with the Kelsan acquisition in November 2004. Timing differences in other operating assets and liabilities resulted in approximately $164,000 of cash generated during the six months ended June 30, 2005. Offsetting these increases were increased accounts receivable of $2.9 million, primarily due to higher sales levels, and higher prepaid expenses and other assets of $1.6 million, during the six months ended June 30, 2005. The increase in prepaid expenses and other assets is primarily due to $520,000 of advance payments on steel purchases from China made by RMP, an increase of $442,000 due from the Canadian government for refundable goods and services taxes paid, and tax credits of $196,000 due to Kelsan from the Canadian government for research and development expenditures. Cash generated from operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2004 includes a decrease in prepaid expenses of $827,000 related to legal and professional fees incurred for the initial public offering of our common stock in January 2004.
Net cash used in investing activities was $768,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2005, compared to $296,000 during the same period in 2004. Cash used in investing activities was for capital expenditures, which upgrade our machinery and equipment, improve our facilities, support new strategic initiatives or develop new products. No individual capital expenditure was greater than $100,000. The majority of our capital spending is discretionary. We believe that the overall level of capital spending for our business segments is sufficient to remain competitive.
Net cash used in financing activities was $3.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, compared to $9.2 million of cash provided by financing activities during the comparable period in 2004. Cash used for financing activities in 2005 includes repayments of long-term debt obligations of $1.8 million and cash dividends paid on common stock of $960,000, in addition to net repayments on revolving and overdraft credit facilities of $413,000. Cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2004 primarily related to the net proceeds received from our initial public offering of common stock in January 2004, and subsequent exercising of an over-allotment option by the underwriter, which provided $18.0 million in net proceeds. Cash used during the first six months of 2004 included net repayments of $7.8 million on short-term and long-term debt obligations and cash dividends paid on common stock of $862,000.
Financial Condition
At June 30, 2005, total assets were $86.6 million, a decrease of $2.0 million or 2.3%, from December 31, 2004. The decrease at June 30, 2005 is primarily due to a decrease of $4.4 million in cash and cash equivalents, which were primarily used for debt service, capital expenditures and dividend payments in the first six months of 2005. This decrease was partially offset by an increase of $2.2 million in accounts receivable at June 30, 2005, which is primarily due to an increase in sales volume at RMP and Canada. At June 30, 2005, net working capital (defined as current assets minus current liabilities) was $25.0 million, a decrease of $297,000 or 1.2%, from $25.3 million at December 31, 2004.
Total outstanding debt obligations were $15.1 million at June 30, 2005, a decrease of $2.6 million or 14.7% from $17.7 million at December 31, 2004. The decrease in total outstanding debt obligations reflects principal payments on the Kelsan acquisition loan with National City Bank (Canada), repayment of borrowings on our revolving credit facility at our Canadian operation near Montreal, and the repayment of term debt by our United Kingdom operation.
The products we manufacture and sell, such as our joint bars, rail anchors and rail spikes, require steel as a major element in the production process. Beginning in 2004, worldwide steel prices began to significantly increase, resulting in surcharges being added to our overall raw material costs. This trend continued throughout 2004 and into 2005, but to a lesser degree. As a result, these steel surcharges have increased our raw material inventory costs. While these higher material costs have had some negative impact on our financial results during 2005, particularly on our track component product lines, we believe the impact of the higher material costs have not had a material
22
impact on our overall financial results. Although we have been successful in passing most of the steel surcharges through to our customers, we have been able to do so at no additional gross profit. If a prolonged increase in steel prices should continue and we are unable to pass on these added costs to our customers, our future earnings may be negatively impacted.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to interest rate risk on our long-term debt obligations and our working capital facilities are under floating interest rate arrangements. We have determined that these risks are not significant enough to warrant hedging programs. If interest rates increase we will be exposed to higher interest rates and we will be required to use more cash to settle our long-term debt obligations. As interest rates increase on our variable long-term debt, it will have a negative impact on future earnings because the interest rates will increase our interest expense. Conversely, if interest rates decrease on our variable long-term debt, it will have a positive impact on future earnings because lower interest rates will decrease our interest expense. Based upon our long-term debt amounts as of June 30, 2005, for every 1% increase or decrease in the interest rate on our long-term debt, our annual interest expense will fluctuate by approximately $151,000.
In addition, we are exposed to foreign currency translation fluctuations with our international operations. We do not have any foreign exchange derivative contracts to hedge against foreign currency exposures. Therefore, we are exposed to the related effects when foreign currency exchange rates fluctuate. If the U.S. dollar strengthens against the Canadian dollar and/or the British pound sterling, the translation rate for these foreign currencies will decrease, which will have a negative impact on our operating income. For example, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, for every 1/100 change in the exchange rate of the Canadian dollar to the U.S. dollar, our Canadian operation’s operating income would have changed by $14,000 and $23,000, respectively. Further, for every 1/100 change in the exchange rate of the British pound sterling to the U.S. dollar, the impact on operating income for our United Kingdom operation for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 would have been $1,000 and $2,000, respectively. Foreign currency translation fluctuations have no impact on cash flows as long as we continue to reinvest any profits back into the respective foreign operations.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Company has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the “Evaluation Date”). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
23
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are involved from time to time in lawsuits that arise in the normal course of business. We actively and vigorously defend all lawsuits. We have been named with numerous other defendants in an environmental lawsuit. The plaintiff seeks to recover costs, which it has incurred, and may continue to incur, to investigate and remediate its former property as required by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC). We have not been named as a liable party by the NYSDEC and believe we have no liability to the plaintiff in the case. We filed a motion for summary judgment seeking a ruling to have us dismissed from the case. In November 2003 the motion for summary judgment was granted and we were dismissed from the case by the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. In March 2004, the plaintiff filed a notice of appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, appealing, in part, the District Court’s decision to dismiss all claims against us. In April 2005, the plaintiff’s appeal was dismissed by the Second Circuit Court without prejudice, and the matter was remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York for consideration in light of a recent United States Supreme Court decision. As of July 2005, all briefs addressing this recent Supreme Court decision have been filed by the parties and oral argument has been scheduled for August 2005. Once the District Court decides this issue upon remand, we expect the plaintiff will again appeal to the Second Circuit. Ongoing litigation may be protracted, and we may incur additional ongoing legal expenses, which are not estimable at this time.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Nothing to report under this item.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Nothing to report under this item.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
The annual meeting of shareholders was held on June 7, 2005. At the annual meeting, shareholders considered the election of eleven (11) directors to the Board of Directors for a one year term and the ratification of the appointment of BKD, LLP as independent auditors for the Company for the year ending December 31, 2005. Of the 9,313,322 shares present by proxy, the following is the number of shares voted for, against or withheld and abstained.
1. | With respect to the election of eleven (11) directors whose terms expire in 2006: |
For | Withheld | Broker Non-Vote | ||||||||||
Marshall T. Reynolds | 9,118,187 | 195,135 | 278,903 | |||||||||
Carl M. Callaway | 9,117,356 | 195,966 | 278,903 | |||||||||
John S. Cooper | 9,294,693 | 18,629 | 278,903 | |||||||||
Philip E. Cline | 9,293,873 | 19,449 | 278,903 | |||||||||
Daniel P. Harrington | 9,119,136 | 194,186 | 278,903 | |||||||||
A. Michael Perry | 9,292,693 | 20,629 | 278,903 | |||||||||
Douglas V. Reynolds | 9,293,524 | 19,798 | 278,903 | |||||||||
Neal W. Scaggs | 9,119,136 | 194,186 | 278,903 | |||||||||
Robert L. Shell, Jr. | 9,113,736 | 199,586 | 278,903 | |||||||||
Kirby J. Taylor | 9,294,693 | 18,629 | 278,903 | |||||||||
Thomas W. Wright | 9,294,293 | 19,029 | 278,903 |
24
2. | With respect to the ratification of the appointment of BKD, LLP as the Company’s independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2005: |
For | Against | Abstained | Broker Non-Vote | |||||||||||||
BKD, LLP | 9,111,972 | 195,043 | 6,307 | 278,903 |
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
On May 11, 2005, a fire occurred at our Troy, New York property destroying some of the structures at that location. The Troy property was acquired as part of the original purchase from our former parent company, Portec Inc., in December 1997 and is a non-operating asset. We are currently renting the entire property to a tenant for a nominal amount. Due to the poor condition of the property, it was uninsurable, but we do not anticipate a write-down of the asset. Subsequent to May 11, 2005, the debris which resulted from the fire damage was removed from the property. We do not believe that the clean-up costs or any contingent costs are material to our results of operations or financial condition.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
(a) Exhibits filed as part of this Form 10-Q:
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
25
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PORTEC RAIL PRODUCTS, INC. | ||||
Date: August 12, 2005 | By: | /s/ John S. Cooper | ||
John S. Cooper, President and Chief | ||||
Executive Officer | ||||
Date: August 12, 2005 | By: | /s/ Michael D. Bornak | ||
Michael D. Bornak, Vice President of | ||||
Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer |
26
EXHIBIT INDEX
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
27