UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
| | |
þ | | QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006
OR
| | |
o | | TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT |
For the transition period from ___ to ___
Commission File Number:000-50543
PORTEC RAIL PRODUCTS, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
| | |
West Virginia | | 55-0755271 |
| | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| | |
900 Old Freeport Road, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania | | 15238-8250 |
| | |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | | (Zip Code) |
(412) 782-6000(Registrant’s Telephone Number)
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such requirements for the past 90 days.
YESþ NOo
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filero Accelerated Filero Non-Accelerated Filerþ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YESo NOþ
As of October 31, 2006, there were 9,601,779 shares issued and outstanding of the Registrant’s Common Stock.
PORTEC RAIL PRODUCTS, INC.
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
| | | | | | |
Item | | | | | |
Number | | | | Page Number | |
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
| | | | | | |
1. | | Financial Statements: | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets September 30, 2006 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2005 | | | 3 | |
| | | | | | |
| | Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited) Three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 | | | 4 | |
| | | | | | |
| | Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) Nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 | | | 5 | |
| | | | | | |
| | Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) | | | 6 | |
| | | | | | |
2. | | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | | | 20 | |
| | | | | | |
3. | | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | | | 31 | |
| | | | | | |
4. | | Controls and Procedures | | | 31 | |
| | | | | | |
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
|
| | | | | | |
1. | | Legal Proceedings | | | 32 | |
| | | | | | |
1A. | | Risk Factors | | | 32 | |
| | | | | | |
2. | | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | | | 32 | |
| | | | | | |
3. | | Defaults Upon Senior Securities | | | 32 | |
| | | | | | |
4. | | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders | | | 32 | |
| | | | | | |
5. | | Other Information | | | 32 | |
| | | | | | |
6. | | Exhibits | | | 33 | |
| | | | | | |
| | Signatures | | | 34 | |
2
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Portec Rail Products, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
| | | | | | | | |
| | September 30 | | December 31 |
| | 2006 | | 2005 |
| | (Unaudited) | | (Audited) |
| | (In Thousands) |
Assets | | | | | | | | |
Current assets | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 1,598 | | | $ | 5,367 | |
Accounts receivable, net | | | 18,944 | | | | 14,198 | |
Inventories, net | | | 22,988 | | | | 20,140 | |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | | 1,446 | | | | 845 | |
Long-lived assets held for sale | | | 500 | | | | — | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 764 | | | | 808 | |
| | |
Total current assets | | $ | 46,240 | | | $ | 41,358 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $11,548 and $10,019 at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively | | | 12,512 | | | | 12,173 | |
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $1,379 and $708 at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively | | | 27,527 | | | | 24,012 | |
Goodwill | | | 13,210 | | | | 11,008 | |
Other assets | | | 511 | | | | 318 | |
| | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 100,000 | | | $ | 88,869 | |
| | |
| | | | | | | | |
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity | | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Current maturities of long-term debt | | $ | 5,313 | | | $ | 3,847 | |
Accounts payable | | | 8,550 | | | | 5,774 | |
Accrued income taxes | | | 1,338 | | | | 813 | |
Customer deposits | | | 934 | | | | 1,401 | |
Accrued compensation | | | 1,465 | | | | 2,231 | |
Other accrued liabilities | | | 2,589 | | | | 1,877 | |
Deferred purchase price – current portion | | | 562 | | | | — | |
| | |
Total current liabilities | | | 20,751 | | | | 15,943 | |
|
Long-term debt, less current maturities | | | 12,411 | | | | 10,402 | |
|
Accrued pension costs | | | 3,144 | | | | 3,036 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 9,691 | | | | 8,556 | |
Deferred purchase price, less current maturity | | | 421 | | | | — | |
Other long-term liabilities | | | 543 | | | | 484 | |
| | |
Total liabilities | | | 46,961 | | | | 38,421 | |
| | |
| | | | | | | | |
Commitments and Contingencies | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Shareholders’ equity: | | | | | | | | |
Common stock, $1 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized, 9,601,779 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively | | | 9,602 | | | | 9,602 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 25,290 | | | | 25,290 | |
Retained earnings | | | 19,359 | | | | 17,332 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | (1,212 | ) | | | (1,776 | ) |
| | |
Total shareholders’ equity | | | 53,039 | | | | 50,448 | |
| | |
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | | $ | 100,000 | | | $ | 88,869 | |
| | |
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
3
Portec Rail Products, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Nine Months Ended |
| | September 30 | | September 30 |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2006 | | 2005 |
| | (Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data) |
Net sales | | $ | 24,282 | | | $ | 24,191 | | | $ | 76,369 | | | $ | 69,098 | |
Cost of sales | | | 16,639 | | | | 16,336 | | | | 53,403 | | | | 46,946 | |
| | | | |
Gross profit | | | 7,643 | | | | 7,855 | | | | 22,966 | | | | 22,152 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selling, general and administrative | | | 5,524 | | | | 4,862 | | | | 16,226 | | | | 14,607 | |
Amortization expense | | | 218 | | | | 177 | | | | 636 | | | | 516 | |
| | | | |
Operating income | | | 1,901 | | | | 2,816 | | | | 6,104 | | | | 7,029 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense | | | 287 | | | | 193 | | | | 792 | | | | 665 | |
Other expense, net | | | 102 | | | | 175 | | | | 173 | | | | 140 | |
| | | | |
Income before income taxes | | | 1,512 | | | | 2,448 | | | | 5,139 | | | | 6,224 | |
Provision for income taxes | | | 311 | | | | 735 | | | | 1,383 | | | | 1,798 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 1,201 | | | $ | 1,713 | | | $ | 3,756 | | | $ | 4,426 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings per share | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic and diluted | | $ | 0.13 | | | $ | 0.18 | | | $ | 0.39 | | | $ | 0.46 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average shares outstanding | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic and diluted | | | 9,601,779 | | | | 9,601,779 | | | | 9,601,779 | | | | 9,601,779 | |
|
Dividends per share | | $ | 0.06 | | | $ | 0.05 | | | $ | 0.18 | | | $ | 0.15 | |
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
4
Portec Rail Products, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Nine Months Ended |
| | September 30 |
| | 2006 | | 2005 |
| | (In Thousands) |
Operating Activities | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 3,756 | | | $ | 4,426 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation expense | | | 1,512 | | | | 1,276 | |
Amortization expense | | | 636 | | | | 517 | |
Provision for doubtful accounts | | | 36 | | | | 7 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | (328 | ) | | | (19 | ) |
Loss on sale of fixed assets | | | 89 | | | | 8 | |
Impairment of long-lived assets | | | 100 | | | | 193 | |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable | | | (2,916 | ) | | | (2,342 | ) |
Inventories | | | (563 | ) | | | 1,955 | |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | | (697 | ) | | | (223 | ) |
Accounts payable | | | 1,806 | | | | (1,128 | ) |
Income taxes payable | | | (101 | ) | | | 700 | |
Accrued expenses | | | (921 | ) | | | (243 | ) |
| | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | | 2,409 | | | | 5,127 | |
| | |
| | | | | | | | |
Investing Activities | | | | | | | | |
Purchase of property, plant and equipment | | | (1,528 | ) | | | (1,128 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of assets | | | 1 | | | | 5 | |
Business acquisition, net of cash acquired | | | (4,826 | ) | | | — | |
| | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (6,353 | ) | | | (1,123 | ) |
| | |
| | | | | | | | |
Financing Activities | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in working capital facilities | | | 18 | | | | (597 | ) |
Principal payments on promissory notes | | | (280 | ) | | | — | |
Proceeds from bank term loans | | | 4,178 | | | | — | |
Principal payments on bank term loans | | | (1,993 | ) | | | (2,680 | ) |
Principal payments on capital leases | | | (49 | ) | | | (19 | ) |
Fees paid to obtain new financing | | | (74 | ) | | | — | |
Cash dividends paid to shareholders | | | (1,728 | ) | | | (1,440 | ) |
| | |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | | 72 | | | | (4,736 | ) |
| | |
| | | | | | | | |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | | | 103 | | | | (40 | ) |
| | |
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents | | | (3,769 | ) | | | (772 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | | | 5,367 | | | | 7,749 | |
| | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | | $ | 1,598 | | | $ | 6,977 | |
| | |
| | | | | | | | |
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information | | | | | | | | |
Cash paid during the period for: | | | | | | | | |
Interest | | $ | 808 | | | $ | 701 | |
| | |
Income taxes | | $ | 2,197 | | | $ | 1,447 | |
| | |
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
5
Portec Rail Products, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Note 1: Organization
Portec Rail Products, Inc. (sometimes herein referred to as “we”, “our”, “us”, the “Company”, or “Portec Rail Products”) was incorporated in West Virginia in 1997. We manufacture, supply and distribute a broad range of rail products, including rail joints, rail anchors, rail spikes, railway friction management products and systems, railway wayside data collection and data management systems and freight car securement devices. We also manufacture material handling equipment through our United Kingdom operation. We serve both the domestic and international markets. Our manufacturing facilities are located in Huntington, West Virginia; St. Jean, Quebec, Canada; Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Wrexham, Wales, United Kingdom; Leicester, England, United Kingdom; and Sheffield, England, United Kingdom. We operate an engineering and assembly facility located in Dublin, Ohio, a distribution facility in Stone, England, United Kingdom, and have offices near Chicago, Illinois; Montreal, Quebec, Canada, and Birmingham, England, United Kingdom. Our corporate headquarters is located near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Note 2: Basis of Presentation
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Portec Rail Products, Inc.; Salient Systems, Inc. (Salient Systems), our wholly-owned United States subsidiary; Portec Rail Nova Scotia Company, our wholly-owned Canadian subsidiary; and Portec Rail Products (UK) Ltd., our wholly-owned United Kingdom subsidiary (United Kingdom). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The foregoing financial information has been prepared in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for interim financial reporting. The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The accompanying interim financial information is unaudited; however, we believe that the financial information reflects all adjustments (consisting of items of a normal recurring nature) necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with GAAP. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in our annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The balance sheet information as of December 31, 2005 was derived from our audited balance sheet included in our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Unless otherwise indicated, all dollar amounts are in U.S. dollars. Certain amounts in the prior year’s consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on net earnings.
Note 3: Acquisition of Coronet Rail, Ltd.
On April 12, 2006, we completed the acquisition of Coronet Rail, Ltd. (Coronet Rail), effective as of April 8, 2006, whereby we acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of Coronet Rail for a total purchase price of $5.7 million (£3.3 million pounds sterling), including direct acquisition costs of $137,000 (£79,000 pounds sterling). Further assessment of asset values during the third quarter of 2006 resulted in additional acquisition costs of $33,000. This increase in total purchase price was allocated directly to goodwill. Of the total cash purchase price of $5.7 million, $4.2 million (£2.4 million pounds sterling) was paid at closing and was financed by a United Kingdom financial institution in the form of 1) a $2.6 million (£1.5 million pounds sterling) five-year term loan and 2) a $1.6 million (£900,000 pounds sterling) fifteen-year term loan. Portec Rail Products (UK) Ltd. is the sole guarantor of the term loans with substantially all of our United Kingdom assets pledged as collateral. In addition to the $4.2 million (£2.4 million pounds sterling) paid at closing, a deferred purchase price of $1.0 million (£600,000 pounds sterling) without interest is to be paid to the former shareholders of Coronet Rail over the subsequent 24-month period in equal, quarterly installments. The share purchase agreement executed in conjunction with the purchase of Coronet Rail required a working capital adjustment of $361,000 (£207,000 pounds sterling) to be paid to the former shareholders of Coronet Rail. Coronet Rail is a major supplier of insulated rail joints and track fasteners to the United Kingdom railways, and is operated under our United Kingdom business segment. Accordingly, all assets and liabilities are included in the United Kingdom segment, and the results of operations for Coronet Rail have been included in the United Kingdom segment and consolidated financial statements since the effective date of the acquisition.
6
Portec Rail Products, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141,Business Combinations,we accounted for the acquisition using the purchase method of accounting. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities of Coronet Rail were adjusted to fair value as of the effective date of the acquisition. In addition, all identifiable intangible assets were recorded at fair value and included as part of net assets acquired. The fair value of intangible assets was determined by an independent appraiser. The assets acquired included $3.5 million (£2.0 million pounds sterling) of intangible assets other than goodwill. Of the $3.5 million of acquired intangible assets, a value of $3.3 million (£1.9 million pounds sterling) was assigned to customer relationships, which will be amortized on a straight-line basis over an estimated useful life of 20 years; a value of $188,000 (£108,000 pounds sterling) was assigned to non-compete agreements with the former shareholders of Coronet Rail, which will be amortized on a straight line basis over an estimated useful life of 5 years; and a value of $34,000 (£19,000 pounds sterling) was assigned to a supply agreement, which will be amortized on a straight-line basis over an estimated useful life of 10 years. As part of the transaction, we recorded $1.9 million (£1.1 million pounds sterling) of goodwill, which represents the excess purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired. In accordance with SFAS No. 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,goodwill will not be amortized but evaluated for impairment annually. All intangible assets resulting from the acquisition are included in the United Kingdom segment. The purchase price allocations are subject to adjustment and may be modified within one year of the acquisition. Subsequent changes are not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, or results of operations.
The following summarizes the estimated fair values as of the acquisition effective date:
| | | | |
| | April 8, | |
| | 2006 | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 12 | |
Accounts receivable, net | | | 1,801 | |
Inventories, net | | | 1,663 | |
Property, plant and equipment, net | | | 362 | |
Intangible Assets | | | 3,499 | |
Goodwill | | | 1,906 | |
| | | |
Total assets acquired | | | 9,243 | |
| | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 1,157 | |
Working capital facility | | | 612 | |
Accrued income taxes | | | 376 | |
Accrued compensation | | | 2 | |
Other accrued liabilities | | | 180 | |
Deferred income taxes (current and long-term) | | | 1,073 | |
Capital leases (current and long-term) | | | 90 | |
| | | |
Total liabilities | | | 3,490 | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Net assets acquired | | $ | 5,753 | |
| | | |
PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION – CORONET RAIL, LTD. ACQUISITION
The following table presents the unaudited pro forma financial information of the Company including Coronet Rail for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, as if the acquisition had occurred on the first day of each period presented, after giving effect to certain purchase accounting adjustments. The pro forma adjustments include the recording of a consulting agreement, the recording of increased director salaries, the recording of interest expense for the debt incurred to finance the acquisition, the recording of amortization expense for acquired intangibles, and the elimination of intercompany management fees. The pro forma information is presented for information purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of results of operations that actually would have been achieved had the acquisition been consummated as of that time, nor is it intended to be a projection of future results.
7
Portec Rail Products, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Nine Months Ended |
| | September 30 | | September 30 |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2006 | | 2005 |
| | (Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data) |
Pro forma net sales | | $ | 24,282 | | | $ | 26,335 | | | $ | 78,412 | | | $ | 74,246 | |
Pro forma net income | | $ | 1,201 | | | $ | 1,880 | | | $ | 3,996 | | | $ | 4,699 | |
Pro forma net income per basic and diluted share | | $ | 0.13 | | | $ | 0.20 | | | $ | 0.42 | | | $ | 0.49 | |
Shares used for basic and diluted computation | | | 9,601,779 | | | | 9,601,779 | | | | 9,601,779 | | | | 9,601,779 | |
Note 4: Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method for all inventories. Inventory costs include material, labor and manufacturing overhead.
The major components of inventories are as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | September 30 | | December 31 |
| | 2006 | | 2005 |
| | (In Thousands) |
Raw materials | | $ | 11,483 | | | $ | 8,764 | |
Work in process | | | 976 | | | | 284 | |
Finished goods | | | 10,855 | | | | 11,592 | |
| | |
| | | 23,314 | | | | 20,640 | |
Less reserve for slow-moving and obsolete inventory | | | 326 | | | | 500 | |
| | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net inventory | | $ | 22,988 | | | $ | 20,140 | |
| | |
Note 5: Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt consists of the following:
| | | | | | | | |
| | September 30 | | December 31 |
| | 2006 | | 2005 |
| | (In Thousands) |
National City Bank Credit Facility:(a) | | | | | | | | |
Term loan facility | | $ | 10,407 | | | $ | 11,716 | |
Revolving credit facility – United States | | | — | | | | — | |
Revolving credit facility – Canada | | | 1,073 | | | | 1,376 | |
| | | | | | | | |
United Kingdom loans:(b) | | | | | | | | |
Term loans – Coronet Rail acquisition | | | 4,263 | | | | — | |
Working capital facility – invoice discounting | | | — | | | | — | |
Working capital facility – overdraft | | | 1,054 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Promissory notes – Salient Systems acquisition(c) | | | 840 | | | | 1,120 | |
Capitalized lease obligations | | | 87 | | | | 37 | |
| | |
| | | 17,724 | | | | 14,249 | |
Less current maturities | | | 5,313 | | | | 3,847 | |
| | |
| | $ | 12,411 | | | $ | 10,402 | |
| | |
8
Portec Rail Products, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(a) National City Bank Credit Facility
Our credit facility with National City Bank and its Canadian affiliate is a $25.0 million term loan and revolving credit facility that also supports the working capital requirements of our United States and Canadian business units. Prior to December 2005, there were three separate borrowing components, 1) a $7.0 million United States revolving credit facility; 2) a $3.1 million ($3.75 million CDN) revolving credit facility for our Canadian operation near Montreal, and 3) an outstanding term loan in the original amount of $14.9 million ($17.6 million CDN). In December 2005, we entered into a new agreement with National City Bank (Canada) for a $4.2 million ($5.0 million CDN) revolving credit facility for our Canadian operations that replaced the $3.1 million ($3.75 million CDN) revolving credit facility for our Canadian operation near Montreal and provides working capital financing for Kelsan. As of September 30, 2006, we had the ability to borrow an additional $8.6 million under the U.S. and Canadian revolving credit facilities.
This agreement contains certain financial covenants that require us to maintain a current ratio, cash flow coverage and leverage ratios, and to maintain minimum amounts of tangible net worth. This credit facility further limits capital expenditures, sales of assets, and additional indebtedness. During the third quarter 2006, the leverage and cash flow coverage covenants were modified. At September 30, 2006, we were in compliance with all of these financial covenants.
National City Bank (Canada) Term Loan Facility:
To finance the acquisition of Kelsan Technologies Corp. (“Kelsan”) on November 30, 2004 we borrowed $14.9 million ($17.6 million CDN) under the term loan facility through Portec Rail Nova Scotia Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Portec Rail Products, Inc. Portec Rail Nova Scotia Company is the borrower of the funds under the credit agreement, and Portec Rail Products, Inc. is the sole guarantor of the term loan with substantially all of our United States assets pledged as collateral. Under this seven-year term loan, our monthly principal payments are approximately $188,000 ($210,050 CDN). We have the option to direct outstanding borrowings under a Canadian prime lending rate option, a Canadian Banker’s Acceptance Equivalent Note (“BA Note”) option, or utilize a combination of both of these options at our discretion. Interest rates under these options are the prevailing Canadian prime rate plus an applicable margin of .75% to 1.75% (prime rate option), or the BA Note interest rate plus an applicable margin of 1.75% to 2.75% (BA Note option). As of September 30, 2006, we had outstanding borrowings of $10.4 million ($11.6 million CDN) that were priced under the BA Note rate option at 6.08%. This term loan is scheduled to mature on November 30, 2011.
National City Bank – United States Revolving Credit Facility:
Under the U.S. revolving credit facility, we can borrow up to $7.0 million to support the working capital requirements of our United States operations. Prior to December 2005, outstanding borrowings under this revolving credit facility could be in an amount up to 80% of the outstanding eligible accounts receivable, plus 50% of the aggregate value of eligible inventory, plus 50% of the value of the outstanding net book value of property, plant and equipment. In December 2005, this credit facility was modified to eliminate the percentage advances against eligible accounts receivable, inventory and property, plant and equipment. Outstanding borrowings under this facility can be priced at either a prime rate or Libor-based rate. There were no outstanding borrowings under this facility as of September 30, 2006. This facility includes a sub-limit of $1.6 million for standby and commercial letters. As of September 30, 2006, two commercial letters of credit were outstanding in the amount of $1.5 million. This credit facility is scheduled to expire on September 30, 2007.
National City Bank (Canada) – Canadian Revolving Credit Facility:
In December 2005, we entered into a new agreement with National City Bank (Canada) for a $4.2 million ($5.0 million CDN) revolving credit facility that replaced the $3.1 million ($3.75 million CDN) revolving credit facility for our Canadian operation near Montreal and provides working capital financing for Kelsan. The interest rate is the Canadian prime rate plus 1.0%. Borrowings on this facility accrued interest at 7.0% at September 30, 2006. Outstanding borrowings under this facility were $1.1 million ($1.2 million CDN) as of September 30, 2006. This facility is scheduled to expire on December 31, 2008.
9
Portec Rail Products, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(b) United Kingdom Loans
Term Loans — Coronet Rail Acquisition:
To finance the acquisition of Coronet Rail, Ltd. on April 12, 2006, our United Kingdom subsidiary borrowed $4.2 million (£2.4 million pounds sterling) from a United Kingdom financial institution in the form of 1) a $2.6 million (£1.5 million pounds sterling) five-year term loan at an interest rate equal to the financial institution’s base rate plus 1.75% and 2) a $1.6 million (£900,000 pounds sterling) fifteen-year term loan at an interest rate equal to the financial institution’s base rate plus 1.25%. Portec Rail Products (UK) Ltd. is the guarantor of the term loans with substantially all of our United Kingdom assets pledged as collateral. As of September 30, 2006, the interest rates on these two loans were 6.50% and 6.00%, respectively. Monthly principal payments are approximately $39,000 (£21,000 pounds sterling) and $6,000 (£3,000 pounds sterling) under the five-year term loan and fifteen-year term loan, respectively. As of September 30, 2006, we had outstanding combined borrowings of $4.3 million (£2.3 million pounds sterling). The $2.6 million and the $1.6 million term loans are scheduled to mature on April 12, 2011 and April 12, 2021, respectively. This agreement contains certain financial covenants that require us to maintain senior interest and cash flow coverage ratios. We were in compliance with these financial covenants as of September 30, 2006.
Working Capital Facility – Invoice Discounting:
In conjunction with the acquisition of Coronet Rail on April 12, 2006, we entered into an accounts receivable factoring facility (“invoice discounting”) with a United Kingdom financial institution that enables Coronet Rail to borrow up to 85% of its eligible accounts receivable, to a maximum of $1.4 million (£750,000 pounds sterling) for its working capital needs. The interest rate on this working capital facility is the financial institution’s base rate plus 2.0%. At September 30, 2006, the interest rate on this facility was 6.75%. There were no outstanding borrowings under this facility as of September 30, 2006. This facility is scheduled to expire on April 12, 2007.
Working Capital Facility – Overdraft:
Prior to the acquisition of Coronet Rail in April 2006, Portec Rail Products (UK) Ltd. had a $1.4 million (£750,000 pounds sterling) overdraft credit facility on its primary bank account with a financial institution in the United Kingdom to support its working capital requirements. The interest rate on this overdraft facility is the financial institution’s base rate plus 1.5%. For any borrowings in excess of $1.4 million (£750,000 pounds sterling) that the financial institution approves, the interest rate is the financial institution’s base rate plus 3.5%. This credit facility provides for an additional $328,000 (£175,000 pounds sterling) of availability for the issuance of performance bonds. The outstanding borrowings were $1.1 million (£563,000 pounds sterling) as of September 30, 2006; however, our availability under this credit facility was reduced due to outstanding performance bonds in the amount of $291,000 (£156,000 pounds sterling) as of September 30, 2006.
In April 2006, in conjunction with the financing provided for the acquisition of Coronet Rail, Ltd. (see Acquisition of Coronet Rail, Ltd., Note 3, page 6), the components of the overdraft facility were modified, resulting in a total credit facility of $1.7 million (£915,000 pounds sterling) and extended until April 12, 2007. The components of this credit facility now include an overdraft availability of $1.3 million (£700,000 pounds sterling), $328,000 (£175,000 pounds sterling) for the issuance of performance bonds, and $75,000 (£40,000 pounds sterling) for the negotiation of foreign checks. This facility is collateralized by substantially all of the assets of Portec Rail Products (UK) Ltd. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, including Coronet Rail, Ltd.
(c) Promissory Notes – Salient Systems Acquisition
In connection with the acquisition of Salient Systems on September 30, 2004, we executed two promissory notes. One promissory note was executed with Harold Harrison, the founder and former President and Chief Executive Officer of Salient Systems. This promissory note, in the aggregate principal amount of $1,064,000 is due to Mr. Harrison in four equal, annual installments of $266,000 beginning January 3, 2006 and ending January 3, 2009. A second promissory note was executed with Falls River Group, LLC, which acted as a financial advisor to Salient Systems. This promissory note, in the aggregate principal amount of $56,000 is due to Falls River Group, LLC in four equal, annual installments of $14,000 beginning January 3, 2006 and ending January 3, 2009. In January 2006, the first principal payments of $266,000 and $14,000, and accrued interest of $85,000,
10
Portec Rail Products, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
were paid to the note holders. The unpaid principal balance of the promissory notes accrues interest at the prime rate as published in theWall Street Journal. All accrued and unpaid interest is payable annually beginning January 3, 2006. The outstanding balance on the promissory notes accrued interest at 8.25% as of September 30, 2006. As of September 30, 2006, we had accrued interest of $50,000 related to these promissory notes.
Note 6: Retirement Plans
The components of our net periodic pension cost (benefit) of our United States defined benefit pension plan are as follows for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Nine Months Ended |
| | September 30 | | September 30 |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2006 | | 2005 |
| | (In Thousands) |
Interest cost | | $ | 133 | | | $ | 130 | | | $ | 398 | | | $ | 390 | |
Expected return on plan assets | | | (161 | ) | | | (170 | ) | | | (485 | ) | | | (510 | ) |
Amortization of unrecognized loss | | | 26 | | | | 12 | | | | 80 | | | | 35 | |
| | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Pension (benefit) | | $ | (2 | ) | | $ | (28 | ) | | $ | (7 | ) | | $ | (85 | ) |
| | |
No contributions were made to this pension plan during 2005 and we do not anticipate making any contributions to this pension plan during 2006.
The components of net periodic pension cost (benefit) of our United Kingdom defined benefit pension plans are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, |
| | Portec Rail | | Conveyors | | Portec Rail | | Conveyors |
| | Plan | | Plan | | Plan | | Plan |
| | 2006 | | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2005 |
| | | | | | (In Thousands) | | | | |
Interest cost | | $ | 73 | | | $ | 17 | | | $ | 77 | | | $ | 11 | |
Expected return on plan assets | | | (80 | ) | | | (16 | ) | | | (72 | ) | | | (18 | ) |
Amortization of transition amount | | | (14 | ) | | | (3 | ) | | | (13 | ) | | | (2 | ) |
Amortization of unrecognized loss (gain) | | | 32 | | | | 1 | | | | 30 | | | | (3 | ) |
| | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Pension cost/(benefit) | | $ | 11 | | | $ | (1 | ) | | $ | 22 | | | $ | (12 | ) |
| | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| | Portec Rail | | Conveyors | | Portec Rail | | Conveyors |
| | Plan | | Plan | | Plan | | Plan |
| | 2006 | | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2005 |
| | | | | | (In Thousands) | | | | |
Interest cost | | $ | 213 | | | $ | 48 | | | $ | 236 | | | $ | 33 | |
Expected return on plan assets | | | (232 | ) | | | (48 | ) | | | (222 | ) | | | (54 | ) |
Amortization of transition amount | | | (40 | ) | | | (8 | ) | | | (41 | ) | | | (8 | ) |
Amortization of unrecognized loss (gain) | | | 91 | | | | 4 | | | | 92 | | | | (9 | ) |
| | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Pension cost/(benefit) | | $ | 32 | | | $ | (4 | ) | | $ | 65 | | | $ | (38 | ) |
| | |
11
Portec Rail Products, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Our funding policy for the Portec Rail plan is to contribute the greater of $22,000 (£12,000 pounds sterling) or the minimum annual contribution required by applicable regulations. Our contributions to the Portec Rail Plan totaled $6,000 and $17,000 (£3,000 and £9,000 pounds sterling) for each of the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005, respectively. No contributions were made to the Conveyors Plan for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005, nor do we expect to make any contributions to this plan during 2006.
Note 7: Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Nine Months Ended |
| | September 30 | | September 30 |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2006 | | 2005 |
| | (In Thousands) |
Net income | | $ | 1,201 | | | $ | 1,713 | | | $ | 3,756 | | | $ | 4,426 | |
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of tax | | | (17 | ) | | | 25 | | | | (110 | ) | | | 137 | |
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax | | | 7 | | | | 300 | | | | 673 | | | | (188 | ) |
| | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income | | $ | 1,191 | | | $ | 2,038 | | | $ | 4,319 | | | $ | 4,375 | |
| | |
Note 8: Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share (EPS) is computed as net income available to common shareholders divided by the weighted average common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share considers the potential dilution that occurs related to issuance of common stock under stock option plans. At the present time, we do not have any stock options outstanding that would cause dilution.
On June 8, 2006, our shareholders approved the Portec Rail Products, Inc. 2006 Stock Option Plan (the Option Plan). The Option Plan authorizes the issuance of up to 150,000 shares of common stock of Portec Rail Products, Inc. pursuant to grants of incentive and non-statutory stock options and will remain in effect for a period of ten years. We adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (R), Shared-Based Payments (SFAS123(R)), effective January 1, 2006. Stock options granted will be accounted for in accordance with SFAS 123 (R). As of September 30, 2006, there were no stock options granted under the Option Plan.
12
Portec Rail Products, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Note 9: Commitments and Contingencies
Contractual Obligations
The following is a summary of our contractual obligations as of September 30, 2006, due on a calendar year basis:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Less | | | | | | | | | | | More | |
| | | | | | than 1 | | | 1 – 3 | | | 3 – 5 | | | than 5 | |
Contractual Obligations | | Total | | | year | | | years | | | years | | | years | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Long term debt | | $ | 15,510 | | | $ | 703 | | | $ | 6,267 | | | $ | 6,152 | | | $ | 2,388 | |
Revolving credit facilities | | | 2,127 | | | | 2,127 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Future interest payments (1) | | | 2,873 | | | | 222 | | | | 1,488 | | | | 675 | | | | 488 | |
Purchase obligations | | | 5,364 | | | | 5,364 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Operating leases Capital leases | | | 3,003 | | | | 301 | | | | 1,543 | | | | 503 | | | | 656 | |
Capital leases | | | 87 | | | | 22 | | | | 65 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Pension contributions (2) | | | 6 | | | | 6 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total contractual obligations | | $ | 28,970 | | | $ | 8,745 | | | $ | 9,363 | | | $ | 7,330 | | | $ | 3,532 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Represents future interest payments on long-term debt obligations as of September 30, 2006. Assumes that the interest rates on our long-term debt agreements at September 30, 2006 (See Note 4 of the consolidated financial statements of Form 10-Q) will continue for the life of the agreements. |
|
(2) | | Pension plan contributions that may be required more than one year from September 30, 2006 will be dependent upon the performance on plan assets. |
Litigation
We are involved from time to time in lawsuits that arise in the normal course of business. We actively and vigorously defend all lawsuits. We have been named with numerous other defendants in an environmental lawsuit. The plaintiff seeks to recover costs which it has incurred, and may continue to incur, to investigate and remediate its former property as required by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC). We have not been named as a liable party by the NYSDEC and believe we have no liability to the plaintiff in the case. We filed a motion for summary judgment seeking a ruling to have us dismissed from the case. In November 2003, the motion for summary judgment was granted and we were dismissed from the case by the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. In March 2004, the plaintiff filed a notice of appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, appealing, in part, the District Court’s decision to dismiss all claims against us. In April 2005, the plaintiff’s appeal was dismissed by the Second Circuit Court without prejudice, and the matter was remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York for consideration in light of a recent United States Supreme Court decision. As a result, in June 2006, the District Court dismissed all claims brought by the plaintiff pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund). On July 24, 2006, the plaintiff filed a notice of appeal to the Second Circuit. Ongoing litigation may be protracted, and we may incur additional ongoing legal expenses, which are not estimable at this time.
Note 10: Segment Information
We operate four business segments consisting of the Railway Maintenance Products Division (RMP), the Shipping Systems Division (SSD), Portec Rail Nova Scotia Company (Canada) and Portec Rail Products (UK) Ltd. (United Kingdom), along with Corporate Shared Services. The presentation of segment information reflects the manner in which we organize and manage our segments by geographic areas for making operating decisions, assessing performance and allocating resources. Intersegment sales are conducted at arm’s-length prices, reflecting prevailing market conditions within the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. Such sales and associated costs are eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.
13
Portec Rail Products, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Nine Months Ended |
| | September 30 | | September 30 |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2006 | | 2005 |
| | (In Thousands) |
External Sales (A) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
RMP | | $ | 11,577 | | | $ | 12,501 | | | $ | 35,726 | | | $ | 33,263 | |
SSD | | | 754 | | | | 1,846 | | | | 2,607 | | | | 4,723 | |
Canada | | | 4,050 | | | | 5,523 | | | | 17,038 | | | | 18,620 | |
United Kingdom | | | 7,901 | | | | 4,321 | | | | 20,998 | | | | 12,492 | |
| | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 24,282 | | | $ | 24,191 | | | $ | 76,369 | | | $ | 69,098 | |
| | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Intersegment Sales (A) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
RMP | | $ | 504 | | | $ | 759 | | | $ | 1,696 | | | $ | 1,794 | |
SSD | | | 1 | | | | 6 | | | | 12 | | | | 9 | |
Canada | | | 1,333 | | | | 1,569 | | | | 4,997 | | | | 4,398 | |
United Kingdom | | | 3 | | | | 9 | | | | 15 | | | | 41 | |
| | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 1,841 | | | $ | 2,343 | | | $ | 6,720 | | | $ | 6,242 | |
| | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Sales | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
RMP | | $ | 12,081 | | | $ | 13,260 | | | $ | 37,422 | | | $ | 35,057 | |
SSD | | | 755 | | | | 1,852 | | | | 2,619 | | | | 4,732 | |
Canada | | | 5,383 | | | | 7,092 | | | | 22,035 | | | | 23,018 | |
United Kingdom | | | 7,904 | | | | 4,330 | | | | 21,013 | | | | 12,533 | |
| | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 26,123 | | | $ | 26,534 | | | $ | 83,089 | | | $ | 75,340 | |
| | |
14
Portec Rail Products, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Nine Months Ended |
| | September 30 | | September 30 |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2006 | | 2005 |
| | | | | | (In Thousands) | | | | |
Operating Income (Loss) (A), (B) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
RMP | | $ | 1,671 | | | $ | 2,085 | | | $ | 4,688 | | | $ | 5,002 | |
SSD | | | 43 | | | | 309 | | | | 183 | | | | 810 | |
Canada | | | 87 | | | | 681 | | | | 1,245 | | | | 2,349 | |
United Kingdom | | | 799 | | | | 358 | | | | 2,230 | | | | 901 | |
Corporate Shared Services | | | (699 | ) | | | (617 | ) | | | (2,242 | ) | | | (2,033 | ) |
| | |
Total | | | 1,901 | | | | 2,816 | | | | 6,104 | | | | 7,029 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest Expense | | | 287 | | | | 193 | | | | 792 | | | | 665 | |
Other Expense, net | | | 102 | | | | 175 | | | | 173 | | | | 140 | |
| | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income Before Income Taxes | | $ | 1,512 | | | $ | 2,448 | | | $ | 5,139 | | | $ | 6,224 | |
| | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and Amortization | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
RMP | | $ | 198 | | | $ | 187 | | | $ | 585 | | | $ | 546 | |
SSD | | | 6 | | | | 4 | | | | 16 | | | | 8 | |
Canada | | | 342 | | | | 300 | | | | 962 | | | | 865 | |
United Kingdom | | | 191 | | | | 117 | | | | 521 | | | | 359 | |
Corporate Shared Services | | | 22 | | | | 6 | | | | 64 | | | | 15 | |
| | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 759 | | | $ | 614 | | | $ | 2,148 | | | $ | 1,793 | |
| | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital Expenditures | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
RMP | | $ | 40 | | | $ | 132 | | | $ | 311 | | | $ | 536 | |
SSD | | | — | | | | 40 | | | | 37 | | | | 40 | |
Canada | | | 148 | | | | 77 | | | | 1,016 | | | | 252 | |
United Kingdom (1) | | | 39 | | | | 98 | | | | 98 | | | | 204 | |
Corporate Shared Services | | | 12 | | | | 12 | | | | 66 | | | | 96 | |
| | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 239 | | | $ | 359 | | | $ | 1,528 | | | $ | 1,128 | |
| | |
| | |
(1) | | Capital expenditures for the United Kingdom do not include assets purchased with the Coronet Rail acquisition of $362,000 of property, plant, and equipment and $5.3 million of goodwill and intangible assets. |
|
(A) | | External sales, intersegment sales, and operating income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 include adjustments for the reclassification of the results of operations of Kelsan Europe from the Canada business segment to the United Kingdom business segment to be consistent with 2006 segment presentation. On December 31, 2005, the assets of Kelsan Europe (formerly part of the Canada segment) were purchased by Portec Rail Products (UK) Ltd. Beginning January 1, 2006, the results of operations for Kelsan Europe are included within our United Kingdom business segment. The net effect of these adjustments on the consolidated results is zero; however, the effects on external sales, intersegment sales, and operating income by business segment are as follows: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Nine Months Ended |
| | September 30 | | September 30 |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2006 | | 2005 |
| | (In Thousands) |
Effects on External Sales | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Canada | | $ | — | | | $ | (809 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | (2,409 | ) |
United Kingdom | | | — | | | | 809 | | | | — | | | | 2,409 | |
| | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| | |
15
Portec Rail Products, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Nine Months Ended |
| | September 30 | | September 30 |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2006 | | 2005 |
| | (In Thousands) |
Effects on Intersegment Sales | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Canada (1) | | $ | — | | | $ | 322 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 728 | |
United Kingdom (1) | | | — | | | | 3 | | | | — | | | | 3 | |
| | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | — | | | $ | 325 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 731 | |
| | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (In Thousands) |
Effects on Operating Income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Canada | | $ | — | | | $ | (77 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | (268 | ) |
United Kingdom | | | — | | | | 77 | | | | — | | | | 268 | |
| | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| | |
| | |
(1) | | Represents intersegment sales between Kelsan-Canada (selling division) and Kelsan-Europe (purchasing division) and vice versa. Prior to January 1, 2006, these sales were eliminated as part of the consolidation of Kelsan Technologies. Beginning January 1, 2006, Kelsan Europe is now included within the United Kingdom business segment; therefore, these sales need to be classified as intersegment sales for the Canada and United Kingdom business segments. This reclassification has no effect on consolidated results. |
|
(B) | | Operating Income (Loss) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 includes an adjustment for the reclassification of three professional and two executive employees’ salary and benefit expenses to be consistent with the allocation of these expenses in 2006. Beginning in April 2005, corporate shared services began to absorb the salaries, benefits, and business travel expenses for one professional and two executive employees due to internal promotions and new responsibilities. Beginning in January 2006, corporate shared services began to absorb the salaries, benefits, and business travel expenses for two professional employees due to the assignment of new responsibilities for these employees. The effects of these adjustments on total Operating Income are zero; however, the effects on Operating Income (Loss) by business segment is as follows: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Nine Months Ended |
| | September 30 | | September 30 |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | | 2006 | | 2005 |
| | (In Thousands) |
Effects on Operating Income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
RMP | | $ | — | | | $ | 39 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 176 | |
Canada | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 31 | |
Corporate Shared Services | | | — | | | | (39 | ) | | | — | | | | (207 | ) |
| | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | September 30 | | | December 31 | |
| | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | (In Thousands) | | | (In Thousands) | |
Total Assets | | | | | | | | |
RMP | | $ | 40,624 | | | $ | 42,531 | |
SSD | | | 2,045 | | | | 2,007 | |
Canada | | | 32,778 | | | | 32,040 | |
United Kingdom | | | 23,845 | | | | 11,503 | |
Corporate Shared Services | | | 708 | | | | 788 | |
| | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 100,000 | | | $ | 88,869 | |
| | | | | | |
16
Portec Rail Products, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Note 11: Restructuring Costs
On July 18, 2006, Portec Rail Products (UK) Ltd. announced a reorganization plan which will consolidate our rail and material handling operations in the United Kingdom. In conjunction with this plan, our Wrexham, Wales and Stone, England facilities will be closed. As a result, the current rail operations at Wrexham and Stone will be transferred to our Sheffield, England facility, and the current material handling operations at Wrexham will be transferred to our Leicester, England facility. During the third quarter of 2006, we began the process of transferring our material handling operations to Leicester. We expect to begin the process of transferring our rail operations to Sheffield during the fourth quarter of 2006. The anticipated closure date for both the Wrexham and Stone facilities is December 31, 2006. This plan will better align our resources in order to improve operating efficiencies and reduce operating costs. We anticipate that the reorganization plan will be substantially completed during the first quarter of 2007.
As part of the reorganization plan, we will incur costs associated with exit and disposal activities, which include, but are not limited to, employee termination benefits, moving expenses, and facility reconfiguration expenses. We will recognize these costs in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 146 Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (SFAS 146). All restructuring expenses are included within selling, general and administrative expenses on the consolidated income statement.
In connection with the transfer of the rail operations to Sheffield and the material handling operations to Leicester, all employees at the Wrexham and Stone facilities were offered employment on similar terms and conditions at the Sheffield and Leicester facilities. If employees choose not to relocate, they will be entitled to receive employee termination benefits if they remain with the Company until their respective work locations are closed. For the three months ended September 30, 2006, we incurred $93,000 (£50,000 pounds sterling) of expense related to employee termination benefits for employees who had notified us that they would not relocate. We expect to incur approximately $108,000 (£57,000 pounds sterling) of additional expense for employee termination benefits over the course of the reorganization plan.
In addition to costs incurred for employee termination benefits, we expect that we will incur costs to move our operations and to reconfigure our existing facilities. We do not expect to incur costs to terminate any operating leases. In accordance with SFAS 146, moving expenses and facility reconfiguration costs cannot be recognized until they are incurred. As of September 30, 2006, we have not recognized expense for any of these costs. We expect to incur approximately $112,000 (£60,000 pounds sterling) of expense related to moving and facility reconfiguration over the course of the reorganization plan.
In conjunction with the announcement that the Wrexham facility will be closing on December 31, 2006, we performed an evaluation in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144 Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS 144) to determine if the facility was subject to a possible impairment loss. As projected cash flows exceeded book value, we concluded that an impairment loss did not exist; therefore, no impairment charge was recognized. No such evaluation is necessary for our Stone, England facility as this is a leased property for which the lease expires on December 31, 2006.
The following table summarizes the Company’s restructuring activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2006:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Employee | | Lease | | Other |
| | | | | | Termination | | Termination | | Associated |
| | Total | | Benefits | | Costs | | Costs |
| | |
Beginning balance, January 1, 2006 | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
Costs incurred | | | 93 | | | | 93 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Cash payments | | | (49) | | | | (49 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
Adjustments | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ending balance, September 30, 2006 | | $ | 44 | | | $ | 44 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| | |
17
Portec Rail Products, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Note 12: Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
In accordance with SFAS 144, we recognized a pre-tax impairment loss of $100,000 on our Troy, New York property to write-down the assets to fair market value, as we have reached an agreement in principle with the City of Troy to sell the property, pending negotiation of final terms and conditions. The impairment charge is included as a component of other expense on the consolidated income statement. We expect the sale of the property to be completed during the fourth quarter of 2006. We have classified these non-operating assets as long-lived assets held for sale on our consolidated balance sheet. As of September 30, 2006, the net book value for these assets is $500,000, which approximates their market value.
Note 13: Change in Accounting Principle
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (R), Share-Based Payments (SFAS 123 (R)). SFAS 123 (R) addresses all forms of share-based payment awards, including shares under employee stock purchase plans, stock options, restricted stock and stock appreciation rights. SFAS 123 (R) requires all share-based payments to be recognized as expense, based upon their fair values, in the financial statements over the vesting period of the awards.
As indicated in Note 8, on June 8, 2006, our shareholders approved the Portec Rail Products, Inc. 2006 Stock Option Plan (the Option Plan). As of September 30, 2006, we had not granted any options under the Option Plan; as such, we have not recognized any expense related to the Option Plan due to the adoption of SFAS 123 (R). If stock options are granted under the Option Plan, we will begin recognizing expense in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123 (R).
On January 1, 2006 we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 151, Inventory Costs – An Amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4 (SFAS 151). SFAS 151 requires that abnormal amounts of idle facility expenses, freight and/or handling, and waste materials (spoilage) be recognized as current-period charges. It also requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to inventory be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. Adoption of this Standard does not have a material effect on our results of operations.
Note 14: Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation No. 48 (Fin 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. Interpretation 48 clarifies Statement 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, by indicating the criteria that an individual tax position is required to meet before an entity can recognize some or all of that position in its financial statements. This Interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This Interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. Interpretation 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company will adopt this Interpretation as of the required effective date. The cumulative effect of initially applying this Interpretation, if any, will be recognized as of the required effective date. We do not expect the adoption of this Interpretation to have a material effect on us.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132 (R) (SFAS 158). Under the new standard, companies must recognize a net liability or asset, based upon the Projected Benefit Obligation (pension plans) or the Accumulated Postretirement Benefit Obligation (other post retirement plans), to report the funded status of their defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans on their balance sheets. The difference between a plan’s funded status and its current balance sheet position will be recognized, net of tax, as a component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. Publicly-traded companies with a calendar year-end are required to adopt the recognition and disclosure provisions of SFAS 158 as of December 31, 2006. We do not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material effect on our results of operations or financial condition. As of December 31, 2003, all of our defined benefit pension plans were frozen; consequently,
18
Portec Rail Products, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
our Projected Benefit Obligation will remain constant, and no adjustment pertaining to the adoption of this new standard will be necessary.
Note 15: Subsequent Events
On October 10, 2006, we entered into a definitive asset purchase agreement with Vulcan Chain Corporation (Vulcan), a Detroit, Michigan manufacturer of freight securement products for the railroad industry, whereby we acquired the assets of Vulcan’s railroad product line. The acquired assets include certain patent interests, equipment, and other intangible assets. The all cash purchase price is $4.3 million subject to a three-year earn-out provision based on the sales volume of the acquired product line. The acquisition was financed with available cash balances and a borrowing from our National City Bank revolving credit facility. On November 7, 2006, we finalized a $3.0 million five-year term loan from National City Bank at an interest rate equal to the 30-day Libor rate plus 1.5%. The proceeds from this term loan were used to repay the revolving credit facility balance. As of November 7, 2006, the interest rate on this loan was 6.8%. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 Business Combinations (SFAS 141), this asset purchase agreement will be accounted for using the purchase method of accounting.
19
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements of Portec Rail Products, Inc. and the related notes beginning on page 3. Unless otherwise specified, any reference to the “three months ended” or “nine months ended” is to the three or nine months ended September 30. Additionally, when used in this Form 10-Q, unless the context requires otherwise, the terms “we,” “our” and “us” refer to Portec Rail Products, Inc. and its business segments.
Cautionary Statement Relevant to Forward-looking Statements
This Form 10-Q contains or incorporates by reference forward-looking statements relating to the Company. Forward-looking statements typically are identified by the use of terms, such as “may,” “will,” “plan,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “if,” “estimate,” “intend,” and similar words, although some forward-looking statements are expressed differently. You should consider statements that contain these and similar words carefully because they describe our expectations, plans, strategies, goals and beliefs concerning future business conditions, our results of operations, our financial position, and our business outlook, or state other “forward-looking” information based on currently available information. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. We undertake no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements. You should not place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements.
The Company identifies important factors that could affect the Company’s financial performance and could cause the Company’s actual results for future periods to differ materially from any opinions or statements expressed with respect to future periods in any current statements. In particular, the Company’s future results could be affected by a variety of factors, such as:
| • | | customer demand; |
|
| • | | competitive dynamics in the North American and worldwide railroad and railway supply industries; |
|
| • | | capital expenditures by the railway industry in North America and worldwide; |
|
| • | | economic conditions, including changes in inflation rates or interest rates; |
|
| • | | product development and the success of new products; |
|
| • | | our ability to successfully pursue, consummate and integrate attractive acquisition opportunities; |
|
| • | | changes in laws and regulations; |
|
| • | | the development and retention of sales representation and distribution agreements with third parties; |
|
| • | | limited international protection of our intellectual property; |
|
| • | | the loss of key personnel; |
|
| • | | fluctuations in the cost and availability of raw materials and supplies, and any significant disruption of supplies; |
|
| • | | foreign economic conditions, including currency rate fluctuations; |
|
| • | | political unrest in foreign markets and economic uncertainty due to terrorism or war; |
|
| • | | exposure to pension liabilities; |
|
| • | | seasonal fluctuations in our sales; |
|
| • | | technological innovations by our competitors; and |
|
| • | | the importation of lower cost competitive products into our markets. |
The Company specifically declines to undertake any obligation to publicly revise any forward-looking statements that have been made to reflect events or circumstances after the date of those statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.
20
Overview
In the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom, we are a manufacturer, supplier and distributor of a broad range of rail products, including rail joints, rail anchors, rail spikes, railway friction management products and systems, railway wayside data collection and data management systems and securement devices. End users of our rail products include Class I railroads, short-line and regional railroads and transit systems. Our North American business segments along with the rail division of our United Kingdom business segment serve these end users. In addition, our United Kingdom business segment also manufactures and supplies material handling products primarily to end users within the United Kingdom. These products include overhead and floor conveyor systems, racking systems and mezzanine flooring systems. The end users of our material handling products are primarily in the manufacturing, distribution, garment and food industries.
In April 2006, we completed the acquisition of Coronet Rail, Ltd. (Coronet Rail), a United Kingdom-based manufacturer of railway track component products. Coronet Rail is a major supplier of insulated rail joints and track fasteners to the United Kingdom railways as well as to international customers, and is located in Sheffield, England, United Kingdom. Coronet Rail is operated under the United Kingdom business segment. Since the acquisition date, all assets and liabilities of Coronet Rail, and the results of operations for Coronet Rail, have been included in the United Kingdom segment and the consolidated financial statements. See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — Acquisition of Coronet Rail, Ltd., Note 3, page 6.
On October 10, 2006, we entered into a definitive asset purchase agreement with Vulcan Chain Corporation (Vulcan), a Detroit, Michigan manufacturer of freight securement products for the railroad industry, whereby we acquired the assets of Vulcan’s railroad product line. See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements – Subsequent Events, Note 15, page 19. Beginning with our 2006 Form 10-K filing, all assets and liabilities of Vulcan and the results of operations for Vulcan, will be included in the Shipping Systems segment and the consolidated financial statements.
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended September 30, 2006 compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2005
Net Sales.Net sales increased to $24.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of $91,000 or 0.4%, from $24.2 million for the comparable period in 2005. Although our net sales were relatively flat in the current quarter compared to the comparable period in 2005, net sales within each of our segments have changed. Net sales at our United Kingdom operations have increased $3.6 million, which was partially offset by a decrease in net sales of $1.5 million at our Canadian operations, $1.1 million at SSD, and $924,000 at RMP. Of the $3.6 million increase in net sales at our United Kingdom operation, $1.9 million is due to stronger customer demand for both our material handling and rail product lines and $331,000 is due to foreign currency translation that positively impacted net sales. Additionally, the acquisition of Coronet Rail in April 2006 added $1.4 million of net sales to our United Kingdom operations during the third quarter of 2006. Net sales at our Canadian operations decreased $1.5 million as a result of a $1.7 million decline in volume, primarily due to weaker demand for rail anchors at our Montreal location, partially offset by a foreign currency translation of $275,000 that positively impacted net sales. Net sales at SSD decreased $1.1 million primarily due to weaker demand for heavy duty load securement systems during the third quarter of 2006. Net sales at RMP decreased $924,000, primarily due to the timing of customer orders for our friction management products, as the third quarter of 2005 benefited from a large order of friction management products.
Gross Profit.Gross profit decreased to $7.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006, a decrease of $212,000 or 2.7%, from $7.9 million for the comparable period in 2005. The decrease in gross profit is attributable to lower gross profit of $488,000 at our Canadian operations, $475,000 at RMP and $277,000 at SSD, partially offset by higher gross profit of $1.0 million at our United Kingdom operations. Gross profit at our Canadian operations declined $488,000 in the current period, primarily due to a decrease in sales volume of our rail anchors and lower gross margin at Kelsan due primarily to higher currency exchange rates. The decrease in gross profit of $475,000 at RMP is primarily due to lower sales volume of our friction management products in the current period. The decline in gross profit of $277,000 at SSD is primarily due to lower sales volume of heavy duty load securement systems. Increased gross profit of $619,000 at our United Kingdom operation includes $516,000 of gross profit attributable to higher sales volume of both our material handling and rail product lines and $103,000 of foreign currency translation that positively impacted gross profit. Additionally, the acquisition of Coronet Rail in April 2006 contributed $409,000 of gross profit to our United Kingdom operations during the current period.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.Selling, general and administrative expenses increased to $5.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of $662,000 or 13.5%, from $4.9 million for the comparable period in 2005. The increase is primarily due to increased expenses of $562,000 at our United Kingdom
21
operation, along with slight increases in expenses at our other business segments. Increased selling, general, and administrative expenses of $284,000 at our United Kingdom operations in Leicester, England and Wrexham, Wales, are primarily due to a non-recurring restructuring charge of $93,000, consulting and other professional fees, research and development expenses, and increased employee benefits. Additionally, the acquisition of Coronet Rail added $278,000 of selling, general, and administrative expenses to our United Kingdom operations during the third quarter of 2006.
Amortization Expense.Amortization expense increased to $218,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of $41,000 or 23.2%, from $177,000 for the comparable period in 2005. This increase is primarily due to amortization expense on intangible assets purchased and deferred financing fees incurred as a result of the Coronet Rail acquisition in April 2006.
Interest Expense.Interest expense increased to $287,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of $94,000 or 48.7%, from $193,000 for the comparable period in 2005. This increase is primarily due to $4.2 million in term loans from a United Kingdom financial institution obtained in April 2006, the proceeds of which were used to finance the acquisition of Coronet Rail, which added $68,000 of interest expense during the third quarter of 2006. Total long-term debt increased to $17.7 million at September 30, 2006, from $14.8 million at September 30, 2005. As a result of the acquisition of the Vulcan railroad product line on October 10, 2006, we expect that our debt levels will increase and as such we anticipate higher interest expense in the future. See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements – Subsequent Events, Note 15, page 19.
Other Expense.Other expense decreased to $102,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2006, a decrease of $73,000 or 41.7%, from $175,000 for the comparable period in 2005. The decrease in expense is primarily due to impairment charges that were recognized on certain non-operating long-lived assets during the third quarter of 2006 and 2005. In the current period, we recognized a $100,000 impairment charge to write-down our Troy, New York property to fair market value, as we have reached an agreement in principle with the City of Troy to sell the property, pending negotiation of final terms and conditions. In the comparable period of the prior year, we recognized an impairment charge of $143,000 on this same property due to partial destruction by a fire.
Provision for Income Taxes.Provision for income taxes decreased to $311,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2006, from $735,000 for the comparable period in 2005. The effective tax rates on taxable income were 20.6% and 30.0% for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Our consolidated effective tax rate reflects research and development tax credits received by our Canadian operations, which reduced income tax expense by $156,000 and $99,000, or 10.3% and 4.1% for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Additionally, because our United Kingdom segment has contributed more pre-tax income in the current period, our consolidated tax expense has a higher contribution from this segment, which has slightly reduced our effective tax rate in the current quarter.
Net Income.Net income decreased to $1.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006, a decrease of $512,000 or 30.1%, from $1.7 million for the comparable period in 2005. Our basic and diluted net income decreased to $0.13 per share for the three months ended September 30, 2006, from $0.18 per share for the comparable period in 2005, on average shares outstanding of 9,601,779 for both periods.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005
Net Sales.Net sales increased to $76.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of $7.3 million or 10.6%, from $69.1 million for the comparable period in 2005. The increase in net sales is primarily attributable to increased sales of $8.5 million at our United Kingdom operations and $2.5 million at RMP, partially offset by a decrease in net sales of $2.1 million at SSD and $1.6 million at our Canadian operations. Of the $8.5 million increase in net sales at our United Kingdom operation, $5.6 million is primarily due to stronger customer demand for both our material handling and rail product lines. Additionally, net sales at our United Kingdom operation were positively impacted by the acquisition of Coronet Rail in April 2006, which added $2.9 million of sales during the current period. Net sales at RMP increased $2.5 million during the first nine months of 2006, reflecting a $2.1 million increase in customer demand for our track component products and a $406,000 increase in customer demand for our wayside data collection and data managements systems at Salient Systems. Included in this $2.1 million is $626,000 related to steel surcharges being a pass-through cost to our customers at no additional profit. Net sales at SSD decreased $2.1 million during the first nine months of 2006, primarily due to weaker customer demand for heavy duty and auto rack load securement systems during the first nine months of 2006. Net sales at our Canadian operations decreased $1.6 million as a result of a $2.9 million decline in volume primarily due to lower demand for rail anchors, partially offset by a foreign currency translation of $1.3 million that positively impacted net sales.
Gross Profit.Gross profit increased to $23.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of $814,000 or 3.7%, from $22.2 million for the comparable period in 2005. However, our consolidated gross profit
22
percent declined to 30.1% in the current period, from 32.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. The decline in gross profit percent is primarily due to the product mix being comprised more from lower margin track components at RMP, in addition to higher raw material costs for some of these track component products. The increase in gross profit is attributable to increased gross profit of $2.5 million at our United Kingdom operation, partially offset by lower gross profit of $907,000 at our Canadian operations, $634,000 at SSD, and $122,000 at RMP. Higher gross profit at our United Kingdom operations of $1.6 million is primarily attributable to higher gross profit on increased sales volume of our material handling and rail product lines. Additionally, the acquisition of Coronet Rail in April 2006 contributed $836,000 of gross profit to our United Kingdom operation in the current period. The decline in gross profit at our Canadian operations includes $1.3 million of lower gross profit primarily due to a decrease in sales volume of rail anchors at our Montreal location and higher foreign currency rates that resulted in lower gross profit at Kelsan, partially offset by foreign currency translation of $426,000 that positively impacted gross profit. Gross profit at SSD decreased $634,000 primarily due to lower sales volume of heavy duty and auto rack load securement systems. The decrease in gross profit at RMP includes a decrease of $468,000 due to lower margin track component products, partially offset by higher gross profit of $346,000 due to higher sales volume at Salient Systems.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.Selling, general and administrative expenses increased to $16.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of $1.6 million or 11.0%, from $14.6 million for the comparable period in 2005. This increase is primarily due to increased expenses of $1.1 million at our United Kingdom operations, $207,000 in corporate shared services, $205,000 at RMP and $134,000 at our Canadian operations. Increased selling, general and administrative expenses of $565,000 at our United Kingdom operations in Leicester, England and Wrexham, Wales, are primarily due to higher professional, legal and consulting fees, a non-recurring restructuring charge of $93,000, increased employee salaries and benefits, employee additions, increased advertising expenses, and higher sales commissions to support the increased sales volumes. Additionally, the acquisition of Coronet Rail in April 2006 added $516,000 of selling, general and administrative expenses to our United Kingdom operations during the current period. Selling, general and administrative expenses for corporate shared services increased $207,000 in the current period primarily due to increased employee benefit costs, higher contractual services, and higher business travel expenses. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses of $205,000 at RMP includes a $180,000 increase in expenses at Salient Systems primarily due to increased employee salaries and benefits, employee additions and higher sales commissions resulting from the increased sales volume. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses of $134,000 at our Canadian operations is primarily due to the effects of foreign currency translation. However, selling, general and administrative expenses in local currency (Canadian dollars) have declined in the current period primarily due to reduced spending on expenses such as business travel at Kelsan.
Amortization Expense.Amortization expense increased to $636,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of $120,000 or 23.3%, from $516,000 for the comparable period in 2005. This increase is primarily due to amortization expense on intangible assets purchased and deferred financing fees incurred as a result of the Coronet Rail acquisition in April 2006.
Interest Expense.Interest expense increased to $792,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of $127,000 or 19.1%, from $665,000 for the comparable period in 2005. This increase is primarily due to $4.2 million in term loans from a United Kingdom financial institution obtained in April 2006, the proceeds of which were used to finance the acquisition of Coronet Rail, which added $123,000 of interest expense during the first nine months of 2006 Total long-term debt increased to $17.7 million at September 30, 2006, from $14.8 million at September 30, 2005. As a result of the acquisition of the Vulcan railroad product line on October 10, 2006, we expect that our debt levels will increase, and as such we anticipate higher interest expense in the future. See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements – Subsequent Events, Note 15, page 19.
Other Expense.Other expense increased to $173,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of $33,000 or 23.6%, from $140,000 for the comparable period in 2005. The increase in expense is primarily due to an increase of $104,000 at our Canadian operations due to foreign currency translation and a loss on disposal of the blast furnace at our Montreal operation. Partially offsetting the increase is a decrease of $76,000, which is primarily due to impairment charges that were recognized on certain non-operating long-lived assets during the first nine months of 2006 and 2005. In the current period, we recognized a $100,000 impairment charge to write-down our Troy, New York property to fair market value, as we have reached an agreement in principle with the City of Troy to sell the property, pending negotiation of final terms and conditions. In the comparable period of the prior year, we recognized an impairment charge of $193,000 on this same property due to partial destruction by a fire and associated clean-up costs.
Provision for Income Taxes.The provision for income taxes decreased to $1.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 from $1.8 million for the comparable period in 2005. The effective tax rates on reported taxable income were 26.9% and 28.9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Our consolidated effective tax rate reflects research and development tax credits received by our Canadian operations, which reduced
23
income tax expense by $289,000 and $296,000, or 5.6% and 4.8% for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Net Income.Net income decreased to $3.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, a decrease of $670,000 or 15.2%, from $4.4 million for the comparable period in 2005. Our basic and diluted net income per share decreased to $0.39 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, from $0.46 per share for the comparable period in 2005, on average shares outstanding of 9,601,779 for both periods.
Business Segment Review
Our operations are organized into four business segments consisting of the Railway Maintenance Products Division (RMP), the Shipping Systems Division (SSD), Portec Rail Nova Scotia Company (Canada) and Portec Rail Products (UK) Ltd. (United Kingdom), along with corporate shared services. The presentation of segment information reflects the manner in which we organize and manage our segments by geographic areas for making operating decisions, assessing performance and allocating resources. Intersegment sales do not have an impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations. Coronet Rail is operated under the United Kingdom business segment. Since the acquisition date, all assets and liabilities of Coronet Rail, and the results of operations for Coronet Rail, have been included in the United Kingdom segment and the consolidated financial statements.
Railway Maintenance Products Division – “RMP”.Our RMP business segment manufactures and assembles track components and related products, friction management products, and wayside data collection and data management systems. We also provide services to railroads, transit systems and railroad contractors, and are a distributor and reseller of purchased track components, and lubricants manufactured by third parties. Our manufactured and assembled track component and friction management products consist primarily of standard and insulated rail joints, friction management systems, and wayside data collection and data management systems. Our purchased and distributed products consist primarily of various lubricants.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | | Nine Months Ended | |
| | September 30 | | | September 30 | |
| | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
External sales | | $ | 11,577 | | | $ | 12,501 | | | $ | 35,726 | | | $ | 33,263 | |
Intersegment sales | | | 504 | | | | 759 | | | | 1,696 | | | | 1,794 | |
Operating income (2) | | | 1,671 | | | | 2,085 | | | | 4,688 | | | | 5,002 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sales by product line(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Track component products (3) | | $ | 5,999 | | | $ | 5,568 | | | $ | 19,381 | | | $ | 17,236 | |
Friction management products and services | | | 4,150 | | | | 5,884 | | | | 13,298 | | | | 13,750 | |
Wayside data collection and data management systems | | | 1,441 | | | | 1,500 | | | | 3,601 | | | | 3,182 | |
Other products and services | | | 491 | | | | 308 | | | | 1,142 | | | | 889 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total product and service sales | | $ | 12,081 | | | $ | 13,260 | | | $ | 37,422 | | | $ | 35,057 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Includes intersegment sales. |
|
(2) | | Includes an adjustment of $39,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2005 to reclass salary and benefit expenses for two professional employees to be consistent with the allocation of these expenses during 2006. Includes an adjustment of $176,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 to reclass salary and benefit expenses for one executive and three professional employees to be consistent with the allocation of these expenses during 2006. Beginning in April 2005, corporate shared services began to absorb the salaries, benefits, and business travel expenses for one professional and one executive employee due to internal promotions and assignment of new responsibilities. The adjustment for this one professional and one executive employee was zero for the three months ended September 30, 2005 and totaled $59,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. Additionally, beginning in January 2006, corporate shared services began to absorb the salaries, benefits and business travel expenses for two professional employees due to the assignment of new responsibilities. The adjustment for these two professional employees totaled $39,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2005 and $117,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. |
|
(3) | | Formerly referred to as Rail Joints and Related Products. |
24
For the three months ended September 30, 2006, external sales for RMP decreased by $924,000 or 7.4%, to $11.6 million from $12.5 million during the comparable period in 2005. The decrease in external sales includes a decrease of $844,000, primarily due to timing of customer orders for our friction management products, as the third quarter of 2005 benefited from a large order from a large customer, partially offset by increased customer demand for our track component products during the third quarter of 2006. Operating income for the three months ended September 30, 2006 decreased to $1.7 million from $2.1 million for the comparable period in 2005, a decrease of $414,000 or 19.9%. The decrease in operating income is attributable to lower gross profit of $475,000, primarily due to lower sales volume of our friction management products, lower gross margin in the current period, primarily due to material cost increases for some of our track component products, and product mix.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, external sales for RMP increased by $2.5 million or 7.4%, to $35.7 million from $33.3 million during the comparable period in 2005. The increase in external sales is primarily due to a $2.1 million increase in customer demand for our track component products and a $406,000 increase in customer demand for our wayside data collection and data management systems at Salient Systems. Included in this $2.1 million is $626,000 related to steel surcharges being a pass-through cost to our customers at no additional profit. Operating income for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 decreased to $4.7 million from $5.0 million for the comparable period in 2005, a decrease of $314,000 or 6.3%. The decrease in operating income is attributable to lower gross profit of $122,000, primarily due to increased raw material costs, and higher selling, general and administrative expenses of $204,000 primarily due to increased employee salaries and benefits, employee additions, and higher sales commissions at Salient Systems.
Shipping Systems Division – “SSD”.SSD engineers and sells load securement systems to the railroad freight car market. These systems are used to secure a wide variety of products and lading onto freight cars. Most of the assembly work for SSD is performed at RMP’s Huntington, West Virginia manufacturing plant, although some manufacturing is subcontracted to independent third parties.
On October 10, 2006, we entered into a definitive asset purchase agreement with Vulcan Chain Corporation (Vulcan), a Detroit, Michigan manufacturer of freight securement products for the railroad industry, whereby we acquired the assets of Vulcan’s railroad product line. See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements – Subsequent Events, Note 15, page 19. Beginning with our 2006 Form 10-K filing, all assets and liabilities of Vulcan and the results of operations for Vulcan, will be included in the Shipping Systems segment and the consolidated financial statements.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | | Nine Months Ended | |
| | September 30 | | | September 30 | |
| | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
External sales | | $ | 754 | | | $ | 1,846 | | | $ | 2,607 | | | $ | 4,723 | |
Intersegment sales | | | 1 | | | | 6 | | | | 12 | | | | 9 | |
Operating income | | | 43 | | | | 309 | | | | 183 | | | | 810 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sales by product line(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Auto rack load securement systems | | $ | 128 | | | $ | 30 | | | $ | 299 | | | $ | 1,005 | |
Heavy duty load securement systems | | | 203 | | | | 1,155 | | | | 908 | | | | 2,045 | |
Strap securement systems | | | 343 | | | | 142 | | | | 721 | | | | 514 | |
All other load securement systems | | | 81 | | | | 525 | | | | 691 | | | | 1,168 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total product and service sales | | $ | 755 | | | $ | 1,852 | | | $ | 2,619 | | | $ | 4,732 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Includes intersegment sales. |
For the three months ended September 30, 2006, external sales for SSD decreased by $1.1 million or 59.2%, to $754,000 from $1.8 million during the comparable period in 2005. The decrease in external sales is primarily due to weaker demand for our heavy duty load securement systems in the current period. Operating income for the three months ended September 30, 2006 decreased to $43,000 from $309,000 during the comparable period in 2005, a decrease of $266,000 or 86.1%, primarily due to lower gross profit on the lower sales volume of heavy duty load securement systems.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, external sales for SSD decreased by $2.1 million or 44.8%, to $2.6 million from $4.7 million during the comparable period in 2005. The decrease in external sales is due to weaker demand for our heavy duty load securement systems and our auto rack load securement systems, primarily auto rack bridge plates, in the current period. Operating income for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 decreased to $183,000 from $810,000 during the comparable period in 2005, a decrease of $627,000 or 77.4%, primarily due to lower gross profit on the lower sales volume of heavy duty and auto rack load securement systems.
25
Portec Rail Nova Scotia Company – “Canada”.Our Canadian operations include a manufacturing operation near Montreal, Quebec, and a manufacturing and technology facility in Vancouver, British Columbia (Kelsan Technologies Corp. – “Kelsan”). At our Canadian operation near Montreal, we manufacture rail anchors and rail spikes and assemble friction management products primarily for the two largest Canadian railroads. Rail anchors and spikes are devices to secure rails to the ties to restrain the movement of the rail tracks. Kelsan’s two primary product lines are stick lubrication and application systems and a liquid friction modifier, Keltrack®. Kelsan manufactures its stick and applicator systems in Vancouver and subcontracts its manufacturing of the Keltrack® product line.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | | Nine Months Ended | |
| | September 30 | | | September 30 | |
| | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | | | | | (In Thousands) | | | | | |
External sales (2) | | $ | 4,050 | | | $ | 5,523 | | | $ | 17,038 | | | $ | 18,620 | |
Intersegment sales (2) | | | 1,333 | | | | 1,569 | | | | 4,997 | | | | 4,398 | |
Operating income (2), (3) | | | 87 | | | | 681 | | | | 1,245 | | | | 2,349 | |
Average translation rate of Canadian dollar to United States dollar | | | 0.8947 | | | | 0.8340 | | | | 0.8882 | | | | 0.8192 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sales by product line(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rail anchors and spikes | | $ | 2,317 | | | $ | 3,974 | | | $ | 12,311 | | | $ | 14,090 | |
Friction management products and services | | | 2,773 | | | | 2,728 | | | | 8,972 | | | | 8,022 | |
Other products and services | | | 293 | | | | 390 | | | | 752 | | | | 906 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total product and service sales | | $ | 5,383 | | | $ | 7,092 | | | $ | 22,035 | | | $ | 23,018 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Includes intersegment sales. |
|
(2) | | Results for the three months ended September 30, 2005 include adjustments of ($809,000), $322,000, and ($77,000) to external sales, intersegment sales, and operating income, respectively, to be consistent with 2006 segment presentation. Results for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 include adjustments of ($2.4 million), $728,000, and ($268,000) to external sales, intersegment sales, and operating income, respectively, to be consistent with 2006 segment presentation. The net effect of the adjustment made to external and intersegment sales is reflected within sales of friction management products and services. On December 31, 2005, the assets of Kelsan Europe (formerly part of the Canada segment) were purchased by Portec Rail Products (UK) Ltd. (United Kingdom segment). Beginning January 1, 2006, the results of operations for Kelsan Europe are included within our United Kingdom business segment. The net effect of these adjustments on consolidated results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 is zero. |
|
(3) | | Includes an adjustment of $31,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 to reclass salary expense for one executive to be consistent with the allocation of these expenses during 2006. No adjustment is necessary for the three months ended September 30, 2005. Beginning in April 2005, corporate shared services began to absorb the salary and business travel expenses for this employee due to an internal promotion and assignment of new responsibilities for this employee. Operating income includes an operating loss from Portec Rail Nova Scotia Company of $151,000 and $140,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and an operating loss from Portec Rail Nova Scotia Company of $448,000 and $413,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. |
For the three months ended September 30, 2006, external sales for Canada decreased by $1.5 million or 26.7%, to $4.0 million from $5.5 million during the comparable period in 2005. The decrease in external sales is primarily attributable to a decrease in sales volume of $1.7 million from rail anchors at our Montreal location, partially offset by a $275,000 foreign currency translation that positively impacted sales. Operating income for the three months ended September 30, 2006 decreased to $87,000 from $681,000 during the comparable period in 2005, a decrease of $594,000 or 87.2%. The decrease is attributable to lower gross profit of $488,000, of which $278,000 is primarily due to lower sales volume of rail anchors at our Montreal location, and $210,000 is due to lower sales volume and higher foreign exchange rates that have resulted in lower gross profit at Kelsan. In addition, selling, general and administrative expenses increased $89,000, primarily due to a $79,000 foreign currency translation that negatively impacted selling, general, and administrative expenses.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, external sales for Canada decreased by $1.6 million or 8.5%, to $17.0 million from $18.6 million during the comparable period in 2005. The decrease in external sales is primarily
26
attributable to a decrease in sales volume of $2.9 million from rail anchors at our Montreal operation, partially offset by a $1.3 million foreign currency translation that positively impacted sales. Operating income for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 decreased to $1.2 million from $2.3 million during the comparable period in 2005, a decrease of $1.1 million or 47.0%. The decrease is attributable to lower gross profit of $842,000 at our Montreal operation primarily due to lower sales volume of rail anchors. In addition, gross profit at Kelsan decreased $490,000 primarily due to higher foreign exchange rates. Offsetting these decreases is a $426,000 foreign currency translation that positively impacted operating income. Additionally, selling, general and administrative expenses increased $134,000 in the current period, primarily due to the effects of foreign currency translation. However, selling, general and administrative expenses in local currency (Canadian dollars) have declined in the current period primarily due to reduced spending on expenses such as business travel at Kelsan.
Portec Rail Products (UK) Ltd. – “United Kingdom”.In the United Kingdom, we operate and serve our customers in two markets. The United Kingdom’s rail business is primarily driven by sales of friction management products and services to the United Kingdom passenger rail network. The United Kingdom’s material handling business includes product lines such as overhead and floor conveyor systems, racking systems and mezzanine flooring systems. The end users of our material handling products are primarily United Kingdom-based companies in the manufacturing, distribution, garment and food industries. On April 12, 2006, we acquired Coronet Rail, effective as of April 8, 2006. Coronet Rail is a United Kingdom-based manufacturer of railway track component products and is a major supplier of insulated rail joints and track fasteners to the United Kingdom railways and international customers, and is located in Sheffield, England, United Kingdom. Since the acquisition, all assets and liabilities of Coronet Rail, and the results of operations for Coronet Rail, have been included in the United Kingdom segment and the consolidated financial statements.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | | Nine Months Ended | |
| | September 30 | | | September 30 | |
| | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
| | | | | | (In Thousands) | | | | | |
External sales (2) | | $ | 7,901 | | | $ | 4,321 | | | $ | 20,998 | | | $ | 12,492 | |
Intersegment sales | | | 3 | | | | 9 | | | | 15 | | | | 41 | |
Operating income (2) | | | 799 | | | | 358 | | | | 2,230 | | | | 901 | |
Average translation rate of British pound sterling to United States dollar | | | 1.8735 | | | | 1.7789 | | | | 1.8290 | | | | 1.8374 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sales by product line(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Material handling products | | $ | 3,393 | | | $ | 2,354 | | | $ | 10,321 | | | $ | 6,769 | |
Friction management products and services | | | 3,166 | | | | 1,976 | | | | 7,800 | | | | 5,764 | |
Track component products (3) | | | 1,345 | | | | — | | | | 2,892 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total product and service sales | | $ | 7,904 | | | $ | 4,330 | | | $ | 21,013 | | | $ | 12,533 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Includes intersegment sales. |
|
(2) | | Results for the three months ended September 30, 2005 include adjustments of $809,000, $3,000 and $77,000 to external sales, intersegment sales, and operating income, respectively, to be consistent with 2006 segment presentation. Results for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 include adjustments of $2.4 million, $3,000 and $268,000 to external sales, intersegment sales, and operating income, respectively, to be consistent with 2006 segment presentation. The increase in external sales is reflected within sales of friction management products and services. On December 31, 2005, the assets of Kelsan Europe (formerly part of the Canada segment) were purchased by Portec Rail Products (UK) Ltd. Beginning January 1, 2006, the results of operations for Kelsan Europe are included within our United Kingdom business segment. The net effect of these adjustments on consolidated results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 is zero. |
|
(3) | | Prior to the acquisition, Coronet Rail’s fiscal year end was March 31st. Before pro forma adjustments, Coronet Rail audited net sales and operating profit for the year ended March 31, 2006 was $7.9 million (£4.4 million pounds sterling) and $1.3 million (£756,000 pounds sterling), respectively. For the year ended March 31, 2005, Coronet Rail audited net sales and operating income was $2.7 million (£1.5 million pounds sterling) and $306,000 (£165,000 pounds sterling), respectively. The amounts listed under this footnote are not included in the above United Kingdom table. |
For the three months ended September 30, 2006, external sales at our United Kingdom operations increased by $3.6 million or 82.8%, to $7.9 million from $4.3 million during the comparable period in 2005. Of this $3.6 million increase, $1.9 million is due to stronger demand for our material handling and friction management product lines and $331,000 is due to foreign currency translation that positively impacted net sales. Additionally, the acquisition of Coronet Rail in April 2006 added $1.4 million in sales during the third quarter of 2006. Operating income for the three months ended September 30, 2006 increased to $799,000 from $358,000 during the comparable period in 2005, an increase of
27
$441,000 or 123.2%. The increase is attributable to additional gross profit of $619,000 due to higher sales volume of our products and services, partially offset by increased selling, general and administrative expenses of $284,000 due to a non-recurring restructuring charge, consulting and other professional fees, research and development expenses, increased employee benefits, and higher sales commissions. Additionally, Coronet Rail contributed $90,000 of operating income in the current period.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, external sales at our United Kingdom operations increased $8.5 million or 68.1%, to $21.0 million from $12.5 million during the comparable period in 2005. Of this $8.5 million, $5.6 million is due to stronger demand for both our material handling and friction management product lines. Additionally, the acquisition of Coronet Rail in April 2006 added $2.9 million of sales to the current period. Operating income for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 increased to $2.2 million from $901,000 during the comparable period in 2005, an increase of $1.3 million or 147.5%. The increase is due to higher gross profit of $1.6 million due to higher sales volume from our products and services, partially offset by an increase of $565,000 in selling, general and administrative expenses due to higher professional, legal, and consulting fees, a non-recurring restructuring charge, increased employee salaries and benefits, employee additions, increased advertising expenses, and higher sales commissions. Additionally, the acquisition of Coronet Rail in April 2006 contributed $215,000 of operating income to the current period.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our cash flow from operations is the primary source of financing for internal growth, capital expenditures, repayment of long-term obligations, dividends to our shareholders, and other commercial commitments. The most significant risk associated with our ability to generate sufficient cash flow from operations is the overall level of demand for our products. Our total cash balance is $1.6 million at September 30, 2006. We may use this cash for acquisitions, product line expansions, or general corporate purposes. In addition to cash generated from operations, we have revolving and overdraft credit facilities in place to support the working capital needs of each of our business segments. We believe that our cash flow from operations and the ability to borrow additional cash under our working capital facilities along with our existing cash balances will be sufficient to meet our cash flow requirements and growth objectives over the next twelve months.
Cash Flow Analysis.During the nine months ended September 30, 2006 we generated $2.4 million in cash from operations compared to generating $5.1 million in cash from operations during the same period in 2005. Cash generated from operations is due to net income of $3.8 million in the current period, compared to $4.4 million during the same period in 2005, a decrease of $670,000. Additionally, we incurred depreciation and amortization expense of $2.1 million in the current period compared to $1.8 million in the same period in 2005, an increase of $355,000. Also, higher accounts payable balances generated $1.8 million of cash in the current period due to the timing of payments to vendors, compared to using $1.1 million of cash during the same period in 2005, an increase of $2.9 million. Conversely, cash used in operations is primarily due to higher accounts receivable balances of $2.9 million in the current period, an increase of $574,000 over the same period in the prior year, primarily as a result of increased sales volume at our United Kingdom operation. Additionally, we used $563,000 of cash to increase inventory balances in order to meet higher sales volume in the current period, compared to generating $2.0 million of cash from lower inventory balances in the same period in 2005, an increase of $2.5 million.
Net cash used in investing activities was $6.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, compared to $1.1 million during the same period in 2005. Of the $6.3 million of cash used, $4.8 million of cash was used for the acquisition of Coronet Rail in April 2006. Additionally, $1.5 million of cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was for capital expenditures. Our capital expenditures upgrade our machinery and equipment, improve our facilities, support new strategic initiatives or develop new products. During 2006, we installed a new induction furnace for our Canadian manufacturing operation near Montreal. This project totaled $1.0 million and was approved by our Board of Directors in 2005. The majority of our capital spending is discretionary. We believe that the overall level of capital spending for our business segments is sufficient to remain competitive.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $72,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, compared to $4.7 million of cash used in financing activities during the comparable period in 2005. Cash provided by financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 is due to proceeds of $4.1 million (net of fees paid) from bank loans to purchase Coronet Rail in April 2006. Cash used in financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 includes repayments of long-term debt obligations of $2.3 million; and cash dividends of $1.7 million paid to shareholders.
Financial Condition
At September 30, 2006, total assets were $100.0 million, an increase of $11.1 million or 12.5%, from $88.9 million at December 31, 2005. The increase at September 30, 2006 is primarily due to higher accounts receivable,
28
inventories, and prepaid expenses and other current assets, which increased $8.2 million, and includes $2.6 million of Coronet Rail assets acquired in April 2006. Also contributing to the increase are intangible assets and goodwill of $5.7 million, which includes $5.3 million of intangible assets and goodwill purchased as a result of the Coronet Rail acquisition in April 2006. Additionally, our net property, plant, and equipment, including an asset held for sale, increased $839,000, which includes $362,000 of Coronet Rail machinery and equipment purchased in April 2006. Partially offsetting these increases in assets is a decrease of $3.8 million in cash, primarily to support capital expenditures, repay indebtedness, and to fund costs associated with the Coronet Rail acquisition during the current period.
Total outstanding debt obligations were $17.7 million at September 30, 2006, an increase of $3.5 million or 24.6% from $14.2 million at December 31, 2005. The increase in total outstanding debt obligations is primarily due to bank term loans obtained in April 2006 in the original amount of $4.2 million, which were used to finance the acquisition of Coronet Rail.
The products that we manufacture and sell, such as our rail joints, rail anchors and rail spikes, require steel as a major element in the production process. Worldwide steel prices began to increase in 2004, resulting in surcharges being added to our overall raw material costs. We have been successful in passing along to our customers (at no additional profit margins), the majority of surcharges that we incurred from our suppliers. However, we have begun to see a transition from surcharges to higher base prices for some of the materials, primarily steel, used in our track component products. As a result, we have incurred higher material costs which have had an impact on our financial results in 2006. If a prolonged increase in steel prices should continue and we are unable to pass on these added costs to our customers, our future earnings may be negatively impacted.
Discussion of Critical Accounting Policies
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our audited and unaudited consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. We review the accounting policies we use in reporting our financial results on a regular basis. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We evaluate the appropriateness of these estimates and judgments on an ongoing basis. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making the judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Results may differ from these estimates due to actual outcomes being different from those on which we based our assumptions. We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition.Revenue from product sales is recognized at the time products are delivered and title has passed or when service is performed. Delivery is determined by our shipping terms, which are primarily FOB shipping point. Shipments are made only under a valid contract or purchase order where the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. Revenue is recognized net of returns, discounts and other allowances.
Revenue from installation of material handling equipment and railway wayside data collection and data management systems is generally recognized by applying percentages of completion for each contract to the total estimated profits for the respective contracts. The length of each contract varies, but is typically about two to five months. The percentages of completion are determined by relating the actual costs of work performed to date, to the current estimated total costs of the respective contracts. Contract costs include all direct material and labor costs and those indirect costs related to contract performance, such as indirect labor, supplies, repairs and depreciation costs.
When the estimate on a contract indicates a loss, the entire loss is immediately recorded in the accounting period that the loss is determined. The cumulative effect of revisions in estimates of total costs or revenue during the course of the work is reflected in the accounting period in which the facts that caused the revision first become known.
Allowances for Doubtful Accounts.We maintain a reserve to absorb probable losses relating to bad debts arising from uncollectible accounts receivable. The allowance for doubtful accounts is maintained at a level that we consider adequate to absorb probable bad debts inherent in the accounts receivable balance and is based on ongoing assessments and evaluations of the collectability, historical loss experience of accounts receivable and the financial status of customers with accounts receivable balances. Bad debts are charged and recoveries are credited to the reserve when incurred.
29
We believe the accounting estimate related to the allowance for doubtful accounts is a “critical accounting estimate” because we have a significant concentration of accounts receivable in the rail industry. The economic conditions could affect our customers’ ability to pay and changes in the estimate could have a material effect on net income.
Inventories.We establish obsolescence reserves for slow-moving and obsolete inventories. Obsolescence reserves reduce the carrying value of slow moving and obsolete inventories to their estimated net realizable value, which generally approximates the recoverable scrap value. We utilize historical usage, our experience, current backlog and forecasted usage to evaluate our reserve amounts. We also periodically evaluate our inventory carrying value to ensure that the amounts are stated at the lower of cost or market. If actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by us, additional inventory reserves may be required.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.We assess the impairment of goodwill at least annually and whenever events or significant changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. We evaluate the goodwill of each of our reporting units for impairment as required under SFAS No. 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” SFAS No. 142 requires that goodwill be tested for impairment using a two-step process. The first step is to identify a potential impairment and the second step measures the amount of an impairment loss, if any. Goodwill is deemed to be impaired if the carrying amount of a reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its estimated fair value. The fair values of our reporting units are determined using a combination of a discounted cash flow analysis and market multiples based upon historical and projected financial information. The estimates of future cash flows, based on reasonable and supportable assumptions and projections, require our judgment. Factors that could change the result of our goodwill impairment test include, but are not limited to, different assumptions used to forecast future revenue, expenses, capital expenditures and working capital requirements used in our cash flow models. In addition, selection of a risk adjusted discount rate on the estimated undiscounted cash flow is susceptible to future changes in market conditions and when unfavorable, can adversely affect our original estimates of fair values. Since adoption of SFAS 142, we have not recognized any impairment of goodwill.
We record the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets of acquisitions in accordance with SFAS No. 142. As part of our procedures to assign fair values to all acquired assets, we hire an independent appraiser to evaluate the technology and intellectual property along with any other intangible assets that we could assign a fair value to under these acquisitions. We supply the independent appraiser with the historical and estimated cash flows of the companies along with an estimate of future costs to maintain these technologies. The independent appraiser uses these estimates and other assumptions to determine the present value of the discounted cash flows of these various technologies and other intangible assets. In addition, we evaluate the future lives of the identified intangible assets to determine if they have definite or indefinite lives.
Defined Benefit Pension Plans.We maintain defined benefit pension plans that cover a significant number of our active employees, former employees and retirees. We account for these plans as required under SFAS No. 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions.” The liabilities and expenses for pensions require significant judgments and estimates. These amounts are determined using actuarial methodologies and incorporate significant assumptions, including the rate used to discount the future estimated liability, inflation, the long-term rate of return on plan assets and mortality tables. Management has mitigated the future liability for active employees by freezing all defined benefit pension plans effective December 31, 2003. The rate used to discount future estimated liabilities is determined considering the rates available at year-end on AA rated corporate long term bonds that could be used to settle obligations of the plan. Our
30
inflation assumption is based on an evaluation of external market indicators. The long-term rate of return is estimated by considering historical returns and expected returns on current and projected asset allocations. The effects of actual results that differ from these assumptions are accumulated and amortized over future periods and, therefore, generally affect recognized expense and the recorded obligations in future periods. While management believes that the assumptions used are appropriate, differences in actual experience or changes in assumptions may affect our obligations and future expense.
As interest rates decline, the actuarially calculated pension plan liability increases. Conversely, as interest rates increase, the actuarially calculated pension liability decreases. Past declines in interest rates and equity markets have had a negative impact on the pension plan liability and fair value of our plan assets. As a result, the accumulated benefit obligation exceeded the fair value of plan assets at December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, which resulted in an $87,000, $882,000 and $577,000, net of tax, respectively, charge to other comprehensive loss.
Income Taxes.Significant judgment is required in determining the provision for income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities and any necessary valuation allowance recorded against net deferred tax assets. As a company with international operations, we record an estimated liability or benefit for our current income tax provision and other taxes based on what we determine will likely be paid in various jurisdictions in which we operate. We use our best judgment in the determination of these amounts. However, the liabilities ultimately realized and paid are dependent on various matters including the resolution of the tax audits in the various affected tax jurisdictions and may differ from the amounts recorded. An adjustment to the estimated liability would be recorded through income in the period in which it becomes probable that the amount of the actual liability differs from the recorded amount. We do not believe that such a charge would be material.
The process of recording deferred tax assets and liabilities involves summarizing temporary differences resulting from the different treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included in the consolidated balance sheet. We must then assess the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and to the extent that we believe that recovery is not likely, a valuation allowance is established. If a valuation allowance is established in a period, an expense is recorded. The valuation allowance is based on our experience, current economic situation and budgets. We believe that operations will provide taxable income levels to recover the deferred tax assets.
ITEM 3.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to interest rate risk on our long-term debt obligations and our working capital facilities are under floating interest rate arrangements. We have determined that these risks are not significant enough to warrant hedging programs. If interest rates increase we will be exposed to higher interest rates and we will be required to use more cash to settle our long-term debt obligations. As interest rates increase on our variable long-term debt, it will have a negative impact on future earnings because the interest rates will increase our interest expense. Conversely, if interest rates decrease on our variable long-term debt, it will have a positive impact on future earnings because lower interest rates will decrease our interest expense. Based upon our long-term debt amounts as of September 30, 2006, for every 1% increase or decrease in the interest rate on our long-term debt, our annual interest expense will fluctuate by approximately $176,000.
In addition, we are exposed to foreign currency translation fluctuations with our international operations. We do not have any foreign exchange derivative contracts to hedge against foreign currency exposures. Therefore, we are exposed to the related effects when foreign currency exchange rates fluctuate. If the U.S. dollar strengthens against the Canadian dollar and/or the British pound sterling, the translation rate for these foreign currencies will decrease, which will have a negative impact on our operating income. For example, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, for every 1/100 change in the exchange rate of the Canadian dollar to the U.S. dollar, our Canadian operation’s operating income would have changed by $1,000 and $14,000, respectively. Further, for every 1/100 change in the exchange rate of the British pound sterling to the U.S. dollar, the impact on operating income for our United Kingdom operation for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 would have been $4,000 and $12,000, respectively. Foreign currency translation fluctuations have no impact on cash flows as long as we continue to reinvest any profits back into the respective foreign operations.
ITEM 4.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Company has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its
31
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the “Evaluation Date”). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are involved from time to time in lawsuits that arise in the normal course of business. We actively and vigorously defend all lawsuits. We have been named with numerous other defendants in an environmental lawsuit. The plaintiff seeks to recover costs which it has incurred, and may continue to incur, to investigate and remediate its former property as required by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC). We have not been named as a liable party by the NYSDEC and believe we have no liability to the plaintiff in the case. We filed a motion for summary judgment seeking a ruling to have us dismissed from the case. In November 2003, the motion for summary judgment was granted and we were dismissed from the case by the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. In March 2004, the plaintiff filed a notice of appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, appealing, in part, the District Court’s decision to dismiss all claims against us. In April 2005, the plaintiff’s appeal was dismissed by the Second Circuit Court without prejudice, and the matter was remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York for consideration in light of a recent United States Supreme Court decision. As a result, in June 2006, the District Court dismissed all claims brought by the plaintiff pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund). On July 24, 2006, the plaintiff filed a notice of appeal to the Second Circuit. Ongoing litigation may be protracted, and we may incur additional ongoing legal expenses, which are not estimable at this time.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
There are no changes to the risk factors disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Nothing to report under this item.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Nothing to report under this item.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Nothing to report under this item.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
Nothing to report under this item.
32
ITEM 6. EXHIBTS
(a) | | Exhibits filed as part of this Form 10-Q: |
| 31.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
| 31.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
| 32 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
33
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | | | | | |
| | PORTEC RAIL PRODUCTS, INC. |
| | | | | | |
Date: November 14, 2006 | | By: | | /s/ Richard J. Jarosinski | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | Richard J. Jarosinski, President and Chief Executive Officer | | |
| | | | | | |
Date: November 14, 2006 | | By: | | /s/ John N. Pesarsick | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | John N. Pesarsick, Chief Financial Officer | | |
34
EXHIBIT INDEX
31.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
31.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
32 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
35