Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2006
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Transition Period From ___________ to ___________
000-50511
Commission File Number
Commission File Number
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Cayman Islands (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | 98-0417107 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
WALKER HOUSE, 87 MARY STREET
P.O. BOX 908GT
GEORGE TOWN, GRAND CAYMAN
CAYMAN ISLANDS
(Address of principal executive office including zip code)
P.O. BOX 908GT
GEORGE TOWN, GRAND CAYMAN
CAYMAN ISLANDS
(Address of principal executive office including zip code)
(345) 949-0100
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesþ Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definitions of “accelerated filer” and “large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filero; Accelerated filerþ; non-accelerated filero
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yeso Noþ
As of August 4, 2006, the registrant had outstanding 24,176,533 Class A Common Shares and 12,687,500 Class B Common Shares.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
As used in this quarterly report, unless the context requires otherwise:
1) | “United America Indemnity,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to United America Indemnity, Ltd., an exempted company incorporated with limited liability under the laws of the Cayman Islands, and its U.S. and Non-U.S. Subsidiaries; | |
2) | our “U.S. Subsidiaries” refers to United America Indemnity Group, Inc. (corporate name changed from U.N. Holdings II, Inc. on September 15, 2005), U.N. Holdings Inc. (liquidated as of May 31, 2006), Wind River Investment Corporation (liquidated as of May 31, 2006), American Insurance Service, Inc., Emerald Insurance Company, Penn-America Group, Inc., our U.S. Insurance Operations and our Agency Operations; | |
3) | “UAI Group” refers to our U.S. Insurance Operations; | |
4) | our “U.S. Insurance Operations” refers to the insurance and related operations conducted by American Insurance Service, Inc.’s subsidiaries, including American Insurance Adjustment Agency, Inc., International Underwriters, LLC, J.H. Ferguson & Associates, LLC, the United National Insurance Companies and the Penn-America Insurance Companies; | |
5) | the “United National Insurance Companies” refers to the insurance and related operations conducted by United National Insurance Company and its subsidiaries, including Diamond State Insurance Company, United National Casualty Insurance Company, and United National Specialty Insurance Company; | |
6) | the “Penn-America Insurance Companies” refers to the insurance and related operations of Penn-America Insurance Company, Penn-Star Insurance Company, and Penn-Patriot Insurance Company; | |
7) | “Penn-America” refers to Penn-America Group, Inc. and it’s subsidiaries; | |
8) | the “Insurance Operations” refers to the U.S. Insurance Operations and the Non-U.S. Insurance Operations; |
Table of Contents
9) | the “Agency Operations” refers to Penn Independent Corporation, PIC Holdings, Inc., Penn Independent Financial Services, Inc., Penn Oceanic Insurance Co., Ltd. (Barbados), Residential Underwriting Agency, Inc., Stratus Insurance Services, Inc. (sold effective December 31, 2005), Stratus Web Builder, Inc. (sold effective December 31, 2005), Apex Insurance Agency, Inc., Apex Insurance Services of Illinois, Inc., Summit Risk Services, Inc., Delaware Valley Underwriting Agency, Inc. (“DVUA”), DVUA Pittsburgh, Inc., DVUA Massachusetts, Inc., DVUA of New York, Inc., DVUA of New Jersey, Inc., DVUA West Virginia, Inc., DVUA North Carolina, Inc., DVUA of Ohio, Inc., DVUA South Carolina, Inc., and DVUA Virginia, Inc.; | |
10) | “Penn Independent” refers to Penn Independent Corporation and its subsidiaries; | |
11) | our “Non-U.S. Insurance Operations” refers to the insurance and reinsurance and related operations of Wind River Barbados and Wind River Bermuda; | |
12) | our “Non-U.S. Subsidiaries” refers to our Non-U.S. Insurance Operations, U.A.I. (Gibraltar) Limited (liquidated as of May 31, 2006), U.A.I. (Gibraltar) II Limited (liquidated as of May 31, 2006), the Luxembourg Companies, U.A.I. (Ireland) Limited, and Wind River Services, Ltd.; | |
13) | “Wind River Barbados” refers to Wind River Insurance Company (Barbados) Ltd.; | |
14) | “Wind River Bermuda” refers to Wind River Insurance Company, Ltd.; | |
15) | the “Luxembourg Companies” refers to U.A.I. (Luxembourg) I S.ar.l., U.A.I. (Luxembourg) II S.ar.l., U.A.I. (Luxembourg) III S.ar.l., U.A.I. (Luxembourg) IV S.ar.l., U.A.I. (Luxembourg) Investment S.ar.l., and Wind River (Luxembourg) S.ar.l.; | |
16) | “AIS” refers to America Insurance Service, Inc.; | |
17) | “United National” refers to the United National Insurance Companies, and Emerald Insurance Company; | |
18) | “Fox Paine & Company” refers to Fox Paine & Company, LLC and affiliated investment funds; | |
19) | “GAAP” refers to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; and | |
20) | “$” or “dollars” refers to U.S. dollars. |
Table of Contents
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts)
(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts)
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS | June 30, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | ||||||
Bonds: | ||||||||
Available for sale securities, at fair value (amortized cost: $1,277,588 and $1,092,137) | $ | 1,238,145 | $ | 1,085,624 | ||||
Preferred shares: | ||||||||
Available for sale securities, at fair value (cost: $3,744 and $6,563) | 4,060 | 6,400 | ||||||
Common shares: | ||||||||
Available for sale securities, at fair value (cost: $56,779 and $56,654) | 62,391 | 59,602 | ||||||
Other invested assets | ||||||||
(cost: $24,674 and $25,942) | 56,224 | 52,427 | ||||||
Total investments | 1,360,820 | 1,204,053 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 137,894 | 220,122 | ||||||
Accounts receivable | 23,812 | 24,235 | ||||||
Agents’ balances, net | 89,301 | 78,669 | ||||||
Reinsurance receivables, net | 1,167,575 | 1,278,156 | ||||||
Accrued investment income | 14,076 | 12,260 | ||||||
Federal income taxes receivable | 247 | 415 | ||||||
Deferred federal income taxes, net | 25,954 | 21,646 | ||||||
Deferred acquisition costs, net | 60,222 | 59,339 | ||||||
Goodwill | 101,900 | 101,854 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net | 30,007 | 30,852 | ||||||
Prepaid reinsurance premiums | 40,129 | 41,688 | ||||||
Other assets | 23,656 | 33,324 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 3,075,593 | $ | 3,106,613 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses | $ | 1,855,890 | $ | 1,914,224 | ||||
Unearned premiums | 279,836 | 272,552 | ||||||
Amounts held for the account of others | 21,869 | 22,781 | ||||||
Ceded balances payable | 16,003 | 22,895 | ||||||
Insurance premium payable | 30,211 | 25,252 | ||||||
Payable for securities | 6,622 | — | ||||||
Contingent commissions | 7,349 | 11,061 | ||||||
Senior notes payable | 90,000 | 90,000 | ||||||
Junior subordinated debentures | 61,857 | 61,857 | ||||||
Notes and loans payable | 5,512 | 6,455 | ||||||
Other liabilities | 35,935 | 39,547 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 2,411,084 | 2,466,624 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8) | — | — | ||||||
Minority interest | — | 62 | ||||||
Shareholders’ equity: | ||||||||
Common shares, $0.0001 par value, 900,000,000 common shares authorized, 24,170,437 and 23,868,402 Class A common shares issued and outstanding, respectively, and 12,687,500 Class B common shares issued and outstanding | 4 | 4 | ||||||
Preferred shares, $0.0001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding | — | — | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 508,604 | 504,541 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income | (8,042 | ) | 9,471 | |||||
Retained earnings | 163,943 | 125,911 | ||||||
Total shareholders’ equity | 664,509 | 639,927 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 3,075,593 | $ | 3,106,613 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
1
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
Quarter Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||
Gross premiums written | $ | 167,295 | $ | 163,902 | $ | 326,853 | $ | 299,362 | ||||||||
Net premiums written | $ | 142,688 | $ | 136,294 | $ | 278,025 | $ | 245,815 | ||||||||
Net premiums earned | $ | 133,751 | $ | 119,802 | $ | 269,181 | $ | 221,914 | ||||||||
Agency commission and fee revenues | 8,804 | 10,115 | 18,351 | 16,367 | ||||||||||||
Net investment income | 17,936 | 11,114 | 31,615 | 22,982 | ||||||||||||
Net realized investment (losses) gains | (4 | ) | 394 | 39 | (222 | ) | ||||||||||
Total revenues | 160,487 | 141,425 | 319,186 | 261,041 | ||||||||||||
Losses and Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||
Net losses and loss adjustment expenses | 80,464 | 71,221 | 159,428 | 134,818 | ||||||||||||
Acquisition costs and other underwriting expenses | 41,775 | 34,907 | 86,088 | 64,446 | ||||||||||||
Agency commission and operating expenses | 8,863 | 10,174 | 18,731 | 17,093 | ||||||||||||
Corporate and other operating expenses | 3,902 | 4,633 | 8,201 | 8,175 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense | 2,958 | 2,180 | 5,678 | 4,096 | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes | 22,525 | 18,310 | 41,060 | 32,413 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense | 2,315 | 145 | 3,600 | 226 | ||||||||||||
Net income before minority interest and equity in net income of partnerships | 20,210 | 18,165 | 37,460 | 32,187 | ||||||||||||
Minority interest, net of taxes | 4 | (23 | ) | — | 9 | |||||||||||
Equity in net income of partnerships | 40 | 314 | 572 | 425 | ||||||||||||
Net income before extraordinary gain | 20,254 | 18,456 | 38,032 | 32,621 | ||||||||||||
Extraordinary gain | — | — | — | 1,426 | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 20,254 | $ | 18,456 | $ | 38,032 | $ | 34,047 | ||||||||
Per share data: | ||||||||||||||||
Net income before extraordinary gain: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.55 | $ | 0.51 | $ | 1.04 | $ | 0.92 | ||||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.55 | $ | 0.50 | $ | 1.03 | $ | 0.91 | ||||||||
Extraordinary gain: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 0.04 | ||||||||
Diluted | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 0.04 | ||||||||
Net income: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.55 | $ | 0.51 | $ | 1.04 | $ | 0.96 | ||||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.55 | $ | 0.50 | $ | 1.03 | $ | 0.95 | ||||||||
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | 36,664,626 | 36,392,539 | 36,615,325 | 35,331,277 | ||||||||||||
Diluted | 37,115,922 | 37,045,044 | 37,047,091 | 36,015,474 | ||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Dollars in thousands)
(Dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
Quarter Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 20,254 | $ | 18,456 | $ | 38,032 | $ | 34,047 | ||||||||
Other comprehensive (loss) income before tax: | ||||||||||||||||
Unrealized (losses) gains on securities: | ||||||||||||||||
Unrealized holding (losses) gains arising during period | (14,883 | ) | 13,927 | (21,262 | ) | 2,332 | ||||||||||
Less: Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income | (19 | ) | (498 | ) | 118 | (1,030 | ) | |||||||||
Other comprehensive (loss) income, before tax | (14,864 | ) | 14,425 | (21,380 | ) | 3,362 | ||||||||||
Income tax (benefit) expense related to items of other comprehensive (loss) income | (3,537 | ) | 3,584 | (3,867 | ) | 93 | ||||||||||
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax | (11,327 | ) | 10,841 | (17,513 | ) | 3,269 | ||||||||||
Comprehensive income, net of tax | $ | 8,927 | $ | 29,297 | $ | 20,519 | $ | 37,316 | ||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity
(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts)
(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts)
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Six Months Ended | Year Ended | |||||||
June 30, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | |||||||
Number of Class A common shares: | ||||||||
Number at beginning of period | 23,868,402 | 15,585,653 | ||||||
Class A common shares issued in merger | — | 7,930,536 | ||||||
Class A common shares issued under share incentive plans | 289,918 | 322,479 | ||||||
Class A common shares issued to directors | 12,117 | 29,734 | ||||||
Number at end of period | 24,170,437 | 23,868,402 | ||||||
Number of Class B common shares: | ||||||||
Number at beginning of period | 12,687,500 | 12,687,500 | ||||||
Number at end of period | 12,687,500 | 12,687,500 | ||||||
Par value of Class A common shares: | ||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | $ | 3 | $ | 2 | ||||
Class A common shares issued | — | 1 | ||||||
Balance at end of period | $ | 3 | $ | 3 | ||||
Par value of Class B common shares: | ||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | $ | 1 | $ | 1 | ||||
Balance at end of period | $ | 1 | $ | 1 | ||||
Additional paid-in capital: | ||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | $ | 504,541 | $ | 356,725 | ||||
Contributed capital from common shares | — | 142,925 | ||||||
Share compensation plans | 4,063 | 5,865 | ||||||
Other | — | (974 | ) | |||||
Balance at end of period | $ | 508,604 | $ | 504,541 | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of deferred income tax: | ||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | $ | 9,471 | $ | 15,507 | ||||
Other comprehensive loss | (17,513 | ) | (6,036 | ) | ||||
Balance at end of period | $ | (8,042 | ) | $ | 9,471 | |||
Retained earnings: | ||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | $ | 125,911 | $ | 60,318 | ||||
Net income | 38,032 | 65,593 | ||||||
Balance at end of period | $ | 163,943 | $ | 125,911 | ||||
Total shareholders’ equity | $ | 664,509 | $ | 639,927 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars in thousands)
(Dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 38,032 | $ | 34,047 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
Amortization of trust preferred securities issuance costs | 131 | 90 | ||||||
Amortization and depreciation | 1,009 | 882 | ||||||
Restricted stock expense | 3,864 | 2,155 | ||||||
Extraordinary gain | — | (1,426 | ) | |||||
Deferred federal income taxes | (783 | ) | (1,178 | ) | ||||
Amortization of bond premium and discount, net | 2,714 | 3,290 | ||||||
Net realized investment (gains) losses | (39 | ) | 222 | |||||
Equity in net earnings of minority interest and net income of partnerships | (572 | ) | (434 | ) | ||||
Changes in: | ||||||||
Agents’ balances | (8,577 | ) | (9,185 | ) | ||||
Account receivables | 423 | 14,179 | ||||||
Reinsurance receivables | 110,581 | 146,925 | ||||||
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses | (58,334 | ) | (113,312 | ) | ||||
Unearned premiums | 7,284 | 20,821 | ||||||
Ceded balances payable | (6,892 | ) | (2,984 | ) | ||||
Insurance premiums payable | 2,969 | (15,036 | ) | |||||
Other assets and liabilities, net | 7,207 | (1,501 | ) | |||||
Amounts held for the account of others | (912 | ) | 3,400 | |||||
Contingent commissions | (3,817 | ) | (2,334 | ) | ||||
Prepaid reinsurance premiums | 1,559 | 3,079 | ||||||
Deferred acquisition costs, net | (1,486 | ) | (19,012 | ) | ||||
Other — net | (2,347 | ) | (2,298 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 92,014 | 60,390 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||
Proceeds from sale of bonds | 41,256 | 145,443 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of stocks | 22,153 | 22,925 | ||||||
Proceeds from maturity of bonds | 85,773 | 27,379 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of other invested assets | 1,293 | 5,914 | ||||||
Purchase of bonds | (302,876 | ) | (284,163 | ) | ||||
Purchase of stocks | (21,085 | ) | (10,906 | ) | ||||
Purchase of other invested assets | (12 | ) | (148 | ) | ||||
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired | — | (58,529 | ) | |||||
Net cash used for investing activities | (173,498 | ) | (152,085 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||
Borrowing under credit facility | 1,865 | 1,954 | ||||||
Repayments of credit facility | (2,322 | ) | (2,583 | ) | ||||
Tax benefits associated with SFAS 123R | 199 | — | ||||||
Dividends paid to minority shareholders | — | (22 | ) | |||||
Capital lease obligations | — | (149 | ) | |||||
Decrease in term debt | — | (336 | ) | |||||
Principal payments of term debt | (486 | ) | — | |||||
Net cash used for financing activities | (744 | ) | (1,136 | ) | ||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | (82,228 | ) | (92,831 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 220,122 | 242,123 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 137,894 | $ | 149,292 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
1. Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
United America Indemnity, Ltd. (“United America Indemnity” or the “Company”), was incorporated on August 26, 2003, and is domiciled in the Cayman Islands. The Company’s Class A common stock is publicly traded on the NASDAQ Global Market under the trading symbol “INDM.”
The consolidated June 30, 2006 and 2005 financial statements are unaudited, but have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and on the same basis as the annual audited consolidated financial statements. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The unaudited consolidated financial statements include all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, of a normal recurring nature and are necessary for a fair statement of results for the interim periods. Results of operations for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results of a full year. The accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained in the Company’s 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of United America Indemnity and its wholly owned subsidiaries. For a comprehensive list of the Company’s subsidiaries, see Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in the Company’s 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The 2005 consolidated financial statements also include the accounts of Stratus Insurance Services, Inc. and Stratus Web Builder, Inc. which were sold effective December 31, 2005.
All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The Company’s wholly owned business trust subsidiaries, United National Group Capital Trust I (“UNG Trust I”), United National Group Capital Statutory Trust II (“UNG Trust II”), Penn-America Statutory Trust I (“Penn Trust I”) and Penn-America Statutory Trust II (“Penn Trust II”), are not consolidated pursuant to Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 46(R), revised December 2003, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (“FIN 46R”). The Company’s business trust subsidiaries have issued $60.0 million in floating rate capital securities (“Trust Preferred Securities”) and $1.9 million of floating rate common securities. The sole assets of the Company’s business trust subsidiaries are $61.9 million of junior subordinated debentures issued by the Company, which have the same terms with respect to maturity, payments and distributions as the Trust Preferred Securities and the floating rate common securities.
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
2. Investments
The Company’s investments in bonds, preferred stock, and common stock are classified as available for sale and are carried at their fair value. The Company purchases bonds with the expectation of holding them to their maturity; however, changes to the portfolio are sometimes required to assure it is appropriately matched to liabilities. In addition, changes in financial market conditions and tax considerations may cause the Company to sell an investment before it matures. The difference between amortized cost and fair value of these investments, excluding the derivative components imbedded in bonds and preferred stock, net of the effect of deferred income taxes, is reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income in shareholders’ equity and, accordingly, has no effect on net income other than for impairments deemed to be other than temporary. The difference between amortized cost and fair value of the derivative components is included in income.
6
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —(Continued)
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
Bonds available for sale with an estimated fair market value of approximately $254.5 million and $311.4 million, were deposited with various governmental authorities in accordance with statutory requirements at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. In addition, bonds with an estimated fair market value of $5.5 million and $5.4 million at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively, were held in a trust fund to meet the regulatory requirements applicable to Wind River Bermuda, one of the Company’s subsidiaries.
The following table contains an analysis of the Company’s securities with gross unrealized losses, categorized by the period that the securities were in a continuous loss position as of June 30, 2006:
Gross Unrealized Losses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost or | Between | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in | Number of | Amortized | Six Months | Seven Months | Greater than | |||||||||||||||||||||||
thousands) | Securities | Fair Value | Cost | Total | or Less | and One Year | One Year (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Bonds | 589 | $ | 1,060,060 | $ | 1,095,817 | $ | 34,757 | $ | 7,858 | $ | 14,242 | $ | 13,657 | |||||||||||||||
Preferred Stock | 3 | 1,606 | 1,687 | 81 | 63 | 18 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | 26 | 14,155 | 14,956 | 801 | 9 | 792 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 35,639 | $ | 7,930 | $ | 15,052 | $ | 13,657 | |||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | At June 30, 2006, the Company had 386 bonds that were in an unrealized loss position for greater than one year. 96% of these securities are investment grade, and the remaining 4% are convertible securities. |
The following table contains an analysis of the Company’s securities with gross unrealized losses, categorized by the period that the securities were in a continuous loss position as of December 31, 2005:
Gross Unrealized Losses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost or | Between | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in | Number of | Amortized | Six Months | Seven Months | Greater than | |||||||||||||||||||||||
thousands) | Securities | Fair Value | Cost | Total | or Less | and One Year | One Year | |||||||||||||||||||||
Bonds | 815 | $ | 725,048 | $ | 737,510 | $ | 12,462 | $ | 5,554 | $ | 6,877 | $ | 31 | |||||||||||||||
Preferred Stock | 5 | 3,039 | 3,423 | 384 | 36 | 348 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | 138 | 29,673 | 30,483 | 810 | 746 | 64 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 13,656 | $ | 6,336 | $ | 7,289 | $ | 31 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Subject to the risks and uncertainties in evaluating the impairment of a security’s value, the impairment evaluation conducted by the Company as of June 30, 2006, concluded the unrealized losses discussed above are not other than temporary impairments.
The Company regularly performs various analytical procedures with respect to its investments, including identifying any security with a fair value below its cost. Upon identification of such securities, a detailed review of all such securities meeting predetermined thresholds is performed to determine whether such decline is other than temporary. If it is determined that a decline in value is other than temporary based upon this detailed review, or if a decline in value for an investment has persisted for twelve continuous months, or if the value of the investment has been 20% or more below cost for six continuous months or more, or significantly declines in value for shorter periods of time, the security is evaluated to determine whether the cost basis of the security should be written down to its fair value. The factors considered in reaching the conclusion that a decline below cost is other than temporary include, among others, whether the issuer is in financial distress, the investment is secured, a significant credit rating action occurred, scheduled interest payments were delayed or missed and changes in laws or regulations have affected an issuer or industry. The amount of any write-down is included in earnings as a realized loss in the period in which the impairment arose.
7
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —(Continued)
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
The Company recorded the following other than temporary losses on its investment portfolio for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005:
Quarter Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||||
Preferred stock | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 167 | $ | — | ||||||||
Common stock | 37 | 50 | 37 | 100 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 37 | $ | 50 | $ | 204 | $ | 100 | ||||||||
3. Reinsurance
The Company cedes insurance to unrelated insurers on a pro rata and excess of loss basis in the ordinary course of business to limit its loss exposure. Reinsurance ceded arrangements do not discharge the Company of primary liability as the originating insurer.
At June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the Company carried reinsurance receivables of $1,167.6 million and $1,278.1 million, respectively. These amounts are net of two purchase accounting adjustments. The first purchase accounting adjustment, which was due to discounting the loss reserves to their present value and applying a risk margin to the discounted reserves, lowered the reinsurance receivables balance by $20.3 million and $21.2 million at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. The second purchase accounting adjustment netted uncollectible reinsurance reserves of $49.1 million against the reinsurance receivables to properly reflect the reinsurance receivables at their fair value on September 5, 2003, the date of the Company’s acquisition of Wind River Investment Corporation. Due to commutations and charge-offs of uncollectible reinsurance recoverables, this purchase accounting adjustment has been reduced to $28.7 million at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005.
At June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the Company held collateral securing its reinsurance receivables of $654.3 million and $691.7 million, respectively. Prepaid reinsurance premiums were $40.1 million and $41.7 million at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. Reinsurance receivables, net of collateral held, were $513.3 million and $586.4 million at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.
During the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, the Company recorded the following ceded amounts:
Quarter Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||||
Earned premium | $ | 24,831 | $ | 27,804 | $ | 50,389 | $ | 56,626 | ||||||||
Commissions | 6,099 | 6,195 | 11,870 | 11,029 | ||||||||||||
Incurred losses (1) | 13,094 | (56,646 | ) | 27,802 | (37,303 | ) |
(1) | — | As a result of the Company’s quarterly review of unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses in the second quarter of 2005, the Company reduced gross and ceded unpaid loss and loss adjustment expenses related to prior periods by $79.2 million. |
The Company’s casualty writings create exposure to casualty clash events. Casualty clash events arise when two or more insureds are involved in the same loss occurrence or a single insured is in involved in a loss occurrence that triggers coverage under multiple policies. During the first quarter of 2006, the Company renewed its casualty clash reinsurance treaty program. The casualty clash reinsurance treaty provides $10.0 million of coverage per occurrence which attaches above the applicable underlying excess of loss general liability, professional liability, and umbrella reinsurance treaties for casualty clash events, loss adjustment expenses, and 90% of losses due to extra contractual obligations and judgments in excess of policy limits.
During the first quarter of 2006, the Company also renewed its umbrella reinsurance treaty, which provides reinsurance coverage equal to nine (9) times the Company’s retained liability, subject to a maximum cession to the reinsurer of $4.5 million per occurrence / per claim / per policy plus the reinsurer’s proportionate share of loss adjustment expenses, losses due to extra contractual obligations, and judgments in excess of policy limits. The Company’s retained liability is $0.5 million per occurrence / per claim / per policy.
The Company has renewed its UAIG Catastrophe Reinsurance Treaty effective during the period June 1, 2006 through May 31, 2007. The Company purchased catastrophe reinsurance coverage for $25.0 million of coverage in excess of $5.0 million per occurrence from Ariel Reinsurance Co. Ltd, American Re-Insurance Company, Axis Specialty Ltd., Endurance Specialty Insurance Ltd., Hannover Re Bermuda Ltd., Montpelier Reinsurance Ltd., Transatlantic Reinsurance Company, and Validus Reinsurance Ltd., all at varying levels of participation. This
8
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —(Continued)
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
coverage provides: 1) $3.0 million of coverage in excess of $5.0 million, with a 55% participation rate by the Company; 2) $8.0 million of coverage in excess of $8.0 million, with a 5% participation rate by the Company; and 3) $14.0 million of coverage in excess of $16.0 million, with no participation by the Company. As a result of this renewal, the Company’s net retention per occurrence under this program has increased from $5.0 million to $7.05 million. The coverage also provides for one full reinstatement of coverage at 100% additional premium as to time and pro-rata as to amount of limit reinstated.
The Company continues to maintain additional excess catastrophe reinsurance providing for $30.0 million of coverage in excess of $30.0 million per occurrence, effective during the period January 1, 2006 through May 31, 2007. The participating reinsurers are American Re-Insurance Company, ACE Tempest Re, Axis Specialty Ltd., Endurance Specialty Insurance Ltd., New Castle Re, Montpelier Reinsurance Ltd., XL Re Ltd., Odyssey America Re, Renaissance Re, and Validus Reinsurance Ltd., all at varying levels of participation, and with no participation by the Company. This coverage also provides for one full reinstatement of coverage at 100% additional premium as to time and pro-rata as to amount of limit reinstated.
Additionally, the Company entered into a catastrophe reinsurance agreement effective during the period June 1, 2006 through May 31, 2007, providing for additional excess catastrophic reinsurance coverage of $15.0 million in excess of $60.0 million per occurrence. The participating reinsurers are Ariel Reinsurance Co. Ltd., Axis Specialty Ltd., Montpelier Reinsurance Ltd., Transatlantic Reinsurance Company, and XL Re Ltd., all at varying levels of participation, and with no participation by the Company. This coverage provides for one full reinstatement of coverage at 100% additional premium as to time and pro-rata as to amount of limit reinstated.
Separately, the Penn-America Insurance Companies did not renew the underlying $3.0 million in excess of $2.0 million of catastrophic reinsurance coverage they previously maintained.
Therefore, in total, the Company currently maintains catastrophic reinsurance coverage of $70.0 million in excess of $5.0 million per occurrence, subject to the above referenced participations by the Company.
4. Income Taxes
The weighted average expected tax provision has been calculated using income before income taxes in each jurisdiction multiplied by that jurisdiction’s applicable statutory tax rate. The Company’s income before income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2006 of $41.1 million represents $23.3 million from the Non-U.S. Subsidiaries and $17.8 million from the U.S. Subsidiaries. The Company’s income before income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2005 of $32.4 million represents $26.5 million from the Non-U.S. Subsidiaries and $5.9 million from the U.S. Subsidiaries.
9
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —(Continued)
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
The following table summarizes the differences between the tax provisions under Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 28, “Interim Financial Reporting” (“APB 28”), for interim financial statement periods and the expected tax provision at the weighted average tax rate:
Quarter Ended | Quarter Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, 2006 | June 30, 2005 | |||||||||||||||
% of Pre- | % of Pre- | |||||||||||||||
Amount | Tax Income | Amount | Tax Income | |||||||||||||
Expected tax provision at weighted average rate | $ | 3,598 | 16.0 | % | $ | 1,448 | 7.9 | % | ||||||||
Adjustments: | ||||||||||||||||
Tax exempt interest | (1,349 | ) | (6.0 | ) | (1,308 | ) | (0.4 | ) | ||||||||
Dividend exclusion | (111 | ) | (0.5 | ) | (75 | ) | (0.6 | ) | ||||||||
Other | 177 | 0.8 | 80 | 0.4 | ||||||||||||
Actual Taxes | $ | 2,315 | 10.3 | % | $ | 145 | 0.8 | % | ||||||||
Six Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, 2006 | June 30, 2005 | |||||||||||||||
% of Pre- | % of Pre- | |||||||||||||||
Amount | Tax Income | Amount | Tax Income | |||||||||||||
Expected tax provision at weighted average rate | $ | 6,257 | 15.2 | % | $ | 2,079 | 6.4 | % | ||||||||
Adjustments: | ||||||||||||||||
Tax exempt interest | (2,601 | ) | (6.3 | ) | (2,561 | ) | (7.9 | ) | ||||||||
Dividend exclusion | (236 | ) | (0.5 | ) | (156 | ) | (0.5 | ) | ||||||||
Other | 180 | 0.4 | 864 | 2.7 | ||||||||||||
Actual Taxes | $ | 3,600 | 8.8 | % | $ | 226 | 0.7 | % | ||||||||
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”), which prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. The provisions of FIN 48 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that this interpretation will have on its financial results and position.
5. Liability for Unpaid Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses
The liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses reflects the Company’s best estimate for future amounts needed to pay losses and related settlement expenses and the impact of the Company’s reinsurance coverages with respect to insured events. Estimating the ultimate claims liability of the Company is necessarily a complex and judgmental process, inasmuch as the amounts are based on management’s informed estimates and judgments using data currently available. In some cases, significant periods of time, up to several years or more, may elapse between the occurrence of an insured loss and the reporting of such to the Company. The method for determining the Company’s liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses includes, but is not limited to, reviewing past loss experience and considering other factors such as legal, social, and economic developments. As additional experience and data become available, the Company’s estimate for the liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses is revised accordingly. If the Company’s ultimate losses, net of reinsurance, prove to differ substantially from the amounts recorded with respect to unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses at June 30, 2006, the related adjustments could have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations.
10
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —(Continued)
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
The following table shows the Company’s estimated gross losses incurred related to the 2005 hurricanes as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005:
(Dollars in thousands) | June 30, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | Increase/ (Decrease) | |||||||||
Katrina first landfall | $ | 650 | $ | 1,250 | $ | (600 | ) | |||||
Katrina second landfall | 36,929 | 30,600 | 6,329 | |||||||||
Rita | 4,500 | 3,400 | 1,100 | |||||||||
Wilma | 8,900 | 7,700 | 1,200 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 50,979 | $ | 42,950 | $ | 8,029 | ||||||
The following table shows the Company’s estimated net losses incurred related to the 2005 hurricanes as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005:
(Dollars in thousands) | June 30, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | Increase/ (Decrease) | |||||||||
Katrina first landfall | $ | 207 | $ | 560 | $ | (353 | ) | |||||
Katrina second landfall | 5,833 | 2,400 | 3,433 | |||||||||
Rita | 4,100 | 3,000 | 1,100 | |||||||||
Wilma | 2,000 | 2,000 | — | |||||||||
Total | $ | 12,140 | $ | 7,960 | $ | 4,180 | ||||||
During the first half of 2006, the Company did not record any favorable or unfavorable loss development relative to prior accident years. Within its property lines, the Company updated its previous estimate of losses relative to hurricanes Katrina, Rita, and Wilma in the first quarter of 2006 and increased its estimate of net losses by $4.2 million. In addition to the losses, an additional $0.2 million of reinstatement costs were incurred during the first half of 2006, bringing the total reinstatement costs associated with these hurricanes to $2.1 million. These increases in net losses were offset by continued favorable development of the Company’s 2005 accident year non-catastrophe property losses, resulting in no impact to total net losses and loss adjustment expenses in 2006. With respect to its hurricane losses, the Company has received over 1,100 claims related to Katrina’s second landfall, and the actual adjustment process has resulted in a higher level of damageability than was reflected in the Company’s original estimates. As a result of the increase in catastrophe reserves, the Company has exceeded the limits of its $25.0 million in excess of $5.0 million catastrophe reinsurance coverage available for Katrina second landfall losses. Additionally, the Penn-America Insurance Companies have exceeded the limits of their underlying $3.0 million in excess of $2.0 million catastrophe reinsurance coverage available for Katrina, Rita, or Wilma losses.
6. Notes and Loans Payable
Notes Payable
Notes payable is comprised of a $4.5 million revolving line of credit which expires on November 30, 2006, bearing interest at the bank’s prime rate less 1.25% payable monthly. The outstanding amounts due on the line of credit as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 were $2.4 million and $2.9 million, respectively. The Company has agreed to a security agreement granting the bank a first priority perfected lien on finance receivables of Penn Independent Financial Services, Inc. (“PIFSI”). On December 29, 2005, AIS entered into a guaranty and suretyship agreement with the bank whereby AIS will unconditionally jointly and severally guarantee the timely payment of any and all indebtedness owed to the bank by PIFSI. Interest expense resulting from the line of credit was $0.04 million and $0.04 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $0.09 million and $0.06 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Loans Payable
Loans payable of $3.1 million and $3.6 million as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 were comprised of three and five loans payable, respectively, to vendors, a minority shareholder, and former minority shareholders. Interest expense related to loans payable was $0.04 million and $0.04 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $0.07 million and $0.05 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
11
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —(Continued)
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
7. Related Party Transactions
At June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, Wind River Barbados was a limited partner in investment funds managed by Fox Paine & Company. The Company’s investment in this limited partnership was valued at $4.1 million at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005. At June 30, 2006, the Company had an additional capital commitment of $4.1 million to the partnership.
During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company paid $0.04 million to Cozen O’Connor for legal services rendered. Stephen A. Cozen, the chairman of Cozen O’Connor, is a member of the Company’s Board of Directors.
During the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company paid $0.02 million and $0.04 million, respectively, in premium to Validus Reinsurance Ltd. (“Validus”), a current participant on the Company’s $30.0 million in excess of $30.0 million and $25.0 million in excess of $5.0 million catastrophe reinsurance treaties. No losses were ceded by the Company under these treaties. The Company expects to pay $0.7 million to Validus in connection with its participation in these reinsurance agreements. Edward J. Noonan, the chairman and chief executive officer of Validus, and John J. Hendrickson, a member of Validus’ Board of Directors, are both members of the Company’s Board of Directors.
On April 20, 2006, the Company announced that it had entered into Amendment No. 1 (the “Amendment”) of the Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement. The Amendment reduces the requirement that the board of directors be comprised of no fewer than eleven directors to no fewer than seven directors. Furthermore, the Amendment (i) reduces the number of directors that Fox Paine & Company can nominate for election from six directors to five directors; and (ii) terminates the right of the Ball family trust to nominate one director for election.
On May 25, 2006, the Company, Fox Paine & Company, and Wind River Holdings, L.P, formerly The AMC Group, L.P. (“Wind River Holdings”), entered into Amendment No. 1 (the “Amendment”) to the Management Agreement (the “Agreement”). The Amendment terminated Wind River Holdings’ services as of May 25, 2006, and provided that Wind River Holdings refund $0.04 million to the Company as a net repayment of the Annual Service Fee paid by the Company to Wind River Holdings on November 2, 2005. Furthermore, the Amendment modifies the Agreement to reflect the Company’s new 6.22% guaranteed senior notes, which were issued in 2005, as opposed to the 5% senior notes, which were paid off by the Company in 2005 upon the issuance of the guaranteed senior notes. Per terms of the Amendment, the next management fee payment of $1.5 million is payable to Fox Paine & Company on November 1, 2006.
On June 30, 2006, DVUA Massachusetts, Inc. repurchased twenty shares of common stock that it issued to a minority shareholder. As a result, DVUA Massachusetts, Inc. is now a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.
During the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company directly reimbursed Fox Paine & Company $0.05 million and $0.1 million, respectively, for expenses incurred in providing management services.
8. Commitments and Contingencies
Legal Proceedings
The Insurance Operations and the Agency Operations are, from time to time, involved in various legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business. The Company purchases insurance and reinsurance policies covering such risks in amounts that it considers adequate. However, there can be no assurance that the insurance and reinsurance coverage that the Company maintains is sufficient or will be available in adequate amounts or at a reasonable cost. The Company does not believe that the resolution of any currently pending legal proceedings, either individually or taken as a whole, will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations, cash flows, or financial condition.
There is a greater potential for disputes with reinsurers who are in a runoff of their reinsurance operations. Some of the Company’s reinsurers are in a runoff of their reinsurance operations, and therefore, the Company closely
12
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —(Continued)
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
monitors those relationships. The Company anticipates that, similar to the rest of the insurance and reinsurance industry, it will continue to be subject to litigation and arbitration proceedings in the ordinary course of business.
9. Share-Based Compensation
Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for share-based compensation awards under the fair value method, which followed the recognition and measurement principles of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123 “Accounting for Share-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”). The fair value method of accounting recognizes share-based compensation in the statements of operation using the grant-date fair value of the stock options and other equity-based compensation expensed over the requisite service and vesting period.
On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123 (R), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123R”), which revises SFAS 123, using the modified prospective application method. SFAS 123R sets accounting requirements for share-based compensation to employees and non-employee directors, and requires companies to recognize in the statement of operations the grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity based compensation. For the purpose of determining the fair value of stock option awards, the Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. SFAS 123R requires the estimation of forfeitures when recognizing compensation expense and that this estimate be adjusted over the requisite service period should actual forfeitures differ from such estimates. Changes in estimated forfeitures are recognized through a cumulative adjustment to compensation in the period of change.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R, cash retained as a result of tax deductions relating to share-based compensation was presented in operating cash flows, along with other tax cash flows. SFAS 123R requires tax benefits relating to excess stock-based compensation deductions to be prospectively presented in the statement of cash flows as financing cash inflows. Tax benefits resulting from stock-based compensation deductions in excess of amounts reported for financial reporting purposes were $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 and $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006.
The adoption of SFAS 123R resulted in a cumulative benefit of $0.1 million.
The Company maintains the United America Indemnity, Ltd. Share Incentive Plan (as so amended, the “Plan”). The purpose of the Plan is to give the Company a competitive advantage in attracting and retaining officers, employees, consultants and non-employee directors by offering stock options, restricted stock and other stock-based awards. As amended in May 2005, the Company may issue up to 5.0 million Class A common shares for issuance pursuant to awards granted under the Plan. Under the Plan, the Company granted 1,909,182 time-based options that generally vest over three to five years and expire ten years from the date of grant. The Company granted 133,415 performance-based options that vest over four years and are conditional upon the Company achieving various operating targets and expire 10 years after the grant date. The exercise price of the options is equivalent to the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of the grant. On September 5, 2003, the Company granted options to purchase Class A common shares to two officers of the Company (“Option-A Tranche”). The Option-A Tranche options have an exercise price of $6.50 per share and expire on September 5, 2013, and were fully vested at the time of the grant.
During the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company recorded $1.2 million and $1.8 million, respectively, of compensation expense for the 1,661,772 options granted under the Plan. During the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2005, the Company recorded $0.3 million and $0.5 million of compensation expense for the 1,800,665 options granted under the Plan. The Company received $0.1 million and $0.6 million of proceeds from the exercise of options during the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $1.1 million and $1.3 million of proceeds from the exercise of options during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
The intrinsic value of the outstanding, exercisable, and exercised options, which is the difference between the fair market value and the strike price of the option, was $10.2 million, $6.0 million, and $1.4 million, respectively, at June 30, 2006. The total unrecognized compensation expense for the outstanding options was $2.8 million at June 30, 2006, which will be recognized over a weighted average life of 2.8 years.
13
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —(Continued)
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
Weighted | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
Number of | Exercise Price | |||||||
Shares | Per Share | |||||||
Options outstanding at December 31, 2005 | 1,545,055 | $ | 11.35 | |||||
Options issued | — | — | ||||||
Options forfeited | (125,162 | ) | $ | 14.99 | ||||
Options cancelled (reversed) | — | — | ||||||
Options exercised | (116,858 | ) | $ | 9.65 | ||||
Options outstanding at June 30, 2006 | 1,303,035 | $ | 13.00 | |||||
Options exercisable at June 30, 2006 | 538,119 | $ | 11.82 | |||||
The options exercisable at June 30, 2006 include the following:
Number of options | Weighted Average | |||||
Option Price | exercisable | Remaining Life | ||||
$6.50 | 56,074 | |||||
$8.49 | 12,834 | |||||
$10.00 | 305,500 | |||||
$14.62 | 2,000 | |||||
$17.00 | 109,894 | |||||
$17.81 | 25,817 | |||||
$18.27 | 25,000 | |||||
$18.40 | 1,000 | |||||
Options exercisable at June 30, 2006 | 538,119 | 7.4 years | ||||
There were no options granted in the six months ended June 30, 2006. The weighted average fair value of options granted under the Plan was $4.73 in the six months ended June 30, 2005, using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the following weighted average assumptions:
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Dividend yield | N/A | 0.0 | % | |||||
Expected volatility | N/A | 23.0 | % | |||||
Risk-free interest rate | N/A | 3.8 | % | |||||
Expected option life | N/A | 5 years | ||||||
Forfeiture rate | 10.2 | % | N/A |
The following tables summarize the range of exercise prices of options outstanding at June 30, 2006:
Weighted Average | ||||||||||
Ranges of | Outstanding at | Per Share Exercise | Weighted Average | |||||||
Exercise Prices | June 30, 2006 | Price | Remaining Life | |||||||
$5.50 — $9.99 | 68,908 | $ | 6.87 | 6.1 years | ||||||
$10.00 — $16.00 | 704,875 | $ | 10.07 | 7.2 years | ||||||
$17.00 — $20.00 | 529,252 | $ | 17.68 | 8.2 years | ||||||
Total | 1,303,035 | |||||||||
Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company granted an aggregate of 334,464 Class A common shares, subject to certain restrictions, to key employees of the Company under the Plan (“Restricted Shares”). The Restricted Shares generally vest over three years. The Company granted an aggregate of 50,201 Class A common shares to non-employee directors of the Company under the Plan (“Director Restricted Shares”), which are fully vested. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company granted 12,117 Director Restricted Shares. As a result of the
14
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —(Continued)
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
Compensation Committee approval of an award of an Annual Integration Bonus as described in Note 21, “Subsequent Events” of the Company’s 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K, during the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company granted 153,701 Restricted Shares to Plan Participants employed as of February 15, 2006 of which 61,436 of shares vested immediately and the remainder over a three-year period. In addition, the Company granted 20,000 Class A common shares, subject to certain restrictions, to several key employees.
The Company recognized compensation expense for restricted stock of $0.2 million and $0.0 million during the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $0.7 million and $0.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The total unrecognized compensation expense for the non-vested restricted stock was $2.8 million at June 30, 2006, which will be recognized over a weighted average life of 3.9 years. The fair value of the 4,933 Restricted Shares that vested during the second quarter of 2006 was $21.60 per share at June 30, 2006.
The following table summarizes the non-vested restricted stock activity for the quarter ended June 30, 2006.
Weighted | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
Number of | Exercise Price | |||||||
Shares | Per Share | |||||||
Non-vested restricted stock at December 31, 2005 | 83,571 | $ | 17.96 | |||||
Stock issued | 185,818 | $ | 21.68 | |||||
Stock vested | (80,349 | ) | $ | 21.23 | ||||
Stock forfeited | (750 | ) | $ | 17.00 | ||||
Stock returned | 750 | $ | 17.00 | |||||
Non-vested restricted stock at June 30, 2006 | 189,040 | $ | 20.74 | |||||
10. Earnings Per Share
Earnings per share have been computed using the weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding during the period.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share.
Quarter Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | 2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||||
Income available to common shareholders before extraordinary gain | $ | 20,254 | $ | 18,456 | $ | 38,032 | $ | 32,621 | ||||||||
Extraordinary gain | — | — | — | 1,426 | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 20,254 | $ | 18,456 | $ | 38,032 | $ | 34,047 | ||||||||
Basic earnings per share: | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted average shares for basic earnings per share | 36,664,626 | 36,392,539 | 36,615,325 | 35,331,277 | ||||||||||||
Net income available to common shareholders before extraordinary gain | $ | 0.55 | $ | 0.51 | $ | 1.04 | $ | 0.92 | ||||||||
Extraordinary gain | — | — | — | 0.04 | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 0.55 | $ | 0.51 | $ | 1.04 | $ | 0.96 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per share: | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted average shares for diluted earnings per share | 37,115,922 | 37,045,044 | 37,047,091 | 36,015,474 | ||||||||||||
Net income available to common shareholders before extraordinary gain | $ | 0.55 | $ | 0.50 | $ | 1.03 | $ | 0.91 | ||||||||
Extraordinary gain | — | — | — | 0.04 | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 0.55 | $ | 0.50 | $ | 1.03 | $ | 0.95 | ||||||||
15
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —(Continued)
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
A reconciliation of weighted average shares for basic earnings per share to weighted average shares for diluted earnings per share is as follows:
Quarter Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
Weighted average shares for basic earnings per share | 36,664,626 | 36,392,539 | 36,615,325 | 35,331,277 | ||||||||||||
Non-vested restricted stock | 23,219 | — | 19,311 | — | ||||||||||||
Options and warrants | 428,077 | 652,505 | 412,455 | 684,197 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average shares for diluted earnings per share | 37,115,922 | 37,045,044 | 37,047,091 | 36,015,474 | ||||||||||||
11. Segment Information
The Company manages its business through two business segments: Insurance Operations and Agency Operations. The Insurance Operations segment includes the operations of the United America Insurance Group and the Non-U.S. Insurance Operations. The Agency Operations segment consists solely of the operations of Penn Independent Corporation and its subsidiaries. The segments follow the same accounting policies used for the Company’s consolidated financial statements. For further disclosure regarding the Company’s accounting policies, please see Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements in the Company’s 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
16
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —(Continued)
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
Following is a tabulation of business segment information. Corporate information is included to reconcile segment data to the consolidated financial statements.
Quarter Ended June 30, 2006: | Insurance | Agency | ||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Operations | Operations | Corporate | Eliminations | Total | |||||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gross premiums written | $ | 167,295 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 167,295 | ||||||||||
Net premiums written | $ | 142,688 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 142,688 | ||||||||||
Net premiums earned | $ | 133,751 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 133,751 | ||||||||||
Agency commission and fee revenues | — | 9,583 | — | (779 | ) | 8,804 | ||||||||||||||
Net investment income | — | — | 17,936 | — | 17,936 | |||||||||||||||
Net realized investment losses | — | — | (4 | ) | — | (4 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total revenues | 133,751 | 9,583 | 17,932 | (779 | ) | 160,487 | ||||||||||||||
Losses and Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net losses and loss adjustment expenses | 80,464 | — | — | — | 80,464 | |||||||||||||||
Acquisition costs and other underwriting expenses | 42,606 | — | — | (831 | ) | 41,775 | ||||||||||||||
Agency commission and operating expenses | — | 9,533 | — | (670 | ) | 8,863 | ||||||||||||||
Corporate and other operating expenses | — | — | 3,708 | 194 | 3,902 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense | — | — | 2,958 | — | 2,958 | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | $ | 10,681 | $ | 50 | $ | 11,266 | $ | 528 | 22,525 | |||||||||||
Income tax expense | 2,315 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income before minority interest and equity in net income of partnerships | 20,210 | |||||||||||||||||||
Minority interest and equity in net income of partnerships | 44 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 20,254 | ||||||||||||||||||
Quarter Ended June 30, 2005: | Insurance | Agency | ||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Operations | Operations | Corporate | Eliminations | Total | |||||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gross premiums written | $ | 163,902 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 163,902 | ||||||||||
Net premiums written | $ | 136,294 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 136,294 | ||||||||||
Net premiums earned | $ | 119,802 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 119,802 | ||||||||||
Agency commission and fee revenues | — | 10,940 | — | (825 | ) | 10,115 | ||||||||||||||
Net investment income | — | — | 11,114 | — | 11,114 | |||||||||||||||
Net realized investment (losses) gains | — | — | 394 | — | 394 | |||||||||||||||
Total revenues | 119,802 | 10,940 | 11,508 | (825 | ) | 141,425 | ||||||||||||||
Losses and Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net losses and loss adjustment expenses | 71,221 | — | — | — | 71,221 | |||||||||||||||
Acquisition costs and other underwriting expenses | 35,079 | — | — | (172 | ) | 34,907 | ||||||||||||||
Agency commission and operating expense | — | 10,573 | — | (399 | ) | 10,174 | ||||||||||||||
Corporate and other operating expenses | — | — | 4,633 | — | 4,633 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense | — | — | 2,180 | — | 2,180 | |||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes | $ | 13,502 | $ | 367 | $ | 4,695 | $ | (254 | ) | 18,310 | ||||||||||
Income tax benefit | 145 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income before equity in net income of partnerships | 18,165 | |||||||||||||||||||
Equity in net income of partnerships | 291 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 18,456 | ||||||||||||||||||
17
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —(Continued)
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2006: | Insurance | Agency | ||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Operations | Operations | Corporate | Eliminations | Total | |||||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gross premiums written | $ | 326,853 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 326,853 | ||||||||||
Net premiums written | $ | 278,025 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 278,025 | ||||||||||
Net premiums earned | $ | 269,181 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 269,181 | ||||||||||
Agency commission and fee revenues | — | 20,144 | — | (1,793 | ) | 18,351 | ||||||||||||||
Net investment income | — | — | 31,615 | — | 31,615 | |||||||||||||||
Net realized investment losses | — | — | 39 | — | 39 | |||||||||||||||
Total revenues | 269,181 | 20,144 | 31,654 | (1,793 | ) | 319,186 | ||||||||||||||
Losses and Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net losses and loss adjustment expenses | 159,428 | — | — | — | 159,428 | |||||||||||||||
Acquisition costs and other underwriting expenses | 87,237 | — | — | (1,149 | ) | 86,088 | ||||||||||||||
Agency commission and operating expenses | — | 19,628 | — | (897 | ) | 18,731 | ||||||||||||||
Corporate and other operating expenses | — | — | 7,814 | 387 | 8,201 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense | — | — | 5,678 | — | 5,678 | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | $ | 22,516 | $ | 516 | $ | 18,162 | $ | (134 | ) | 41,060 | ||||||||||
Income tax expense | 3,600 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income before minority interest and equity in net income of partnerships | 37,460 | |||||||||||||||||||
Minority interest and equity in net income of partnerships | 572 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 38,032 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Assets | $ | 3,017,060 | $ | 58,533 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 3,075,593 | ||||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005: | Insurance | Agency | ||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Operations | Operations | Corporate | Eliminations | Total | |||||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gross premiums written | $ | 299,362 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 299,362 | ||||||||||
Net premiums written | $ | 245,815 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 245,815 | ||||||||||
Net premiums earned | $ | 221,914 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 221,914 | ||||||||||
Agency commission and fee revenues | — | 17,723 | — | (1,356 | ) | 16,367 | ||||||||||||||
Net investment income | — | — | 22,982 | — | 22,982 | |||||||||||||||
Net realized investment (losses) gains | — | — | (222 | ) | — | (222 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total revenues | 221,914 | 17,723 | 22,760 | (1,356 | ) | 261,041 | ||||||||||||||
Losses and Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net losses and loss adjustment expenses | 134,818 | — | — | — | 134,818 | |||||||||||||||
Acquisition costs and other underwriting expenses | 64,755 | — | — | (309 | ) | 64,446 | ||||||||||||||
Agency commission and operating expense | — | 17,750 | — | (657 | ) | 17,093 | ||||||||||||||
Corporate and other operating expenses | — | — | 8,175 | — | 8,175 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense | — | — | 4,096 | — | 4,096 | |||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes | $ | 22,341 | $ | (27 | ) | $ | 10,489 | $ | (390 | ) | 32,413 | |||||||||
Income tax benefit | 226 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income before equity in net income of partnerships | 32,187 | |||||||||||||||||||
Equity in net income of partnerships | 434 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income before extraordinary gain | 32,621 | |||||||||||||||||||
Extraordinary gain | 1,426 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 34,047 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Assets | $ | 3,052,984 | $ | 77,594 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 3,130,578 | ||||||||||
18
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS —(Continued)
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
12. Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Taxes and Interest Paid
Quarter Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||||
Net federal income taxes paid | $ | 4,000 | $ | 2,983 | $ | 4,000 | $ | 1,603 | ||||||||
Interest paid | 1,470 | 1,158 | 2,719 | 2,239 |
13. Restructuring
On January 23, 2006, the Company announced that it was combining the operations of United National and Penn-America under a single United America Insurance Group management structure. As a result of this restructuring, the Company recognized severance costs of approximately $0.3 million in the first quarter of 2006. No restructuring costs were incurred during the second quarter of 2006. Restructuring costs are included in acquisition and other underwriting expenses.
The Company expects to incur additional costs as it moves its employees to a single location, which the Company anticipates will cost approximately $0.3 million. The Company will likely need to lease temporary space in order to accommodate all employees during the move.
14. Subsequent Events
Joseph F. Morris, the Company’s President since January 2006 and formerly Chief Financial Officer and President of Penn-America Group, Inc. will resign from the Company, effective August 25, 2006. Mr. Morris’ responsibilities include general corporate oversight, shareholder and SEC reporting, and investor relations for the Company. The Company is currently conducting a search for a Chief Executive Officer.
19
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes of United America Indemnity included elsewhere in this report. Some of the information contained in this discussion and analysis or set forth elsewhere in this report, including information with respect to our plans and strategy, constitutes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Please see “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” for a discussion of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results described in or implied by the forward-looking statements contained herein. For more information regarding our business and operations, please see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Recent Developments
On May 31, 2006, U.A.I. (Gibraltar) Limited and U.A.I. (Gibraltar) II Limited were liquidated into Wind River Barbados. On that same day, U.N. Holdings, Inc. and Wind River Investment Corporation were liquidated into United America Indemnity Group, Inc.
On June 23, 2006, DVUA Massachusetts, Inc. repurchased twenty shares of common stock that it issued to a minority shareholder. As a result, DVUA Massachusetts, Inc. is now our wholly owned subsidiary.
Joseph F. Morris, our President since January 2006 and former Chief Financial Officer and President of Penn-America Group, Inc. will resign from the company, effective August 25, 2006. Mr. Morris’ responsibilities include general corporate oversight, shareholder and SEC reporting, and investor relations. We are currently conducting a search for a Chief Executive Officer.
During the third quarter of 2006, a decision was made to sell a portion of our tax-free bond portfolio and reinvest the proceeds in taxable bonds. When these transactions are executed, we expect to incur a realized loss; however, shareholders’ equity will not be impacted due to the fact that the unrealized loss has previously been recognized as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. This reinvestment will allow us to utilize our alternative minimum tax (“AMT”) carryforward of $13.0 million, which is a component of our deferred tax asset on the balance sheet, faster than we otherwise would.
Overview
We distribute our insurance products through a group of approximately 150 professional general agencies that have limited quoting and binding authority, and that in turn sell our insurance products to insureds through retail insurance brokers.
In connection with the consolidation of our U.S. Insurance Subsidiaries under a single United America Insurance Group management structure, we have reevaluated our product classifications. All commercial binding authority insurance products are now marketed through approximately 110 general agents for the Penn-America Insurance Companies and the United National Insurance Companies and will be managed and marketed as the Penn-America business unit. All specialty product offerings, including professional liability lines of business, brokerage facilities, class-specific programs and umbrella/excess business, will continue to be managed and marketed as the United National business unit.
We derive our revenues primarily from premiums paid on insurance policies that we write, from commissions and service fees of our Agency Operations, and from income generated by our investment portfolio, net of fees paid for investment management services. The amount of insurance premiums that we receive is a function of the amount and type of policies we write, as well as of prevailing market prices.
Our expenses include losses and loss adjustment expenses, acquisition costs and other underwriting expenses, agency commissions and operating expenses, corporate and other operating expenses, interest, and other investment expenses. Losses and loss adjustment expenses are estimated by management and reflect our best estimate of
20
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
ultimate losses and costs arising during the reporting period and revisions of prior period estimates. We record losses and loss adjustment expenses based on an actuarial analysis of the estimated losses we expect to be reported on insurance policies written. The ultimate losses and loss adjustment expenses will depend on the actual costs to resolve claims. Acquisition costs consist principally of commissions that are typically a percentage of the premiums on insurance policies written, net of ceding commissions earned from reinsurers. Other underwriting expenses consist primarily of personnel expenses and general operating expenses. Agency commissions and operating expenses include commissions retained by agents and producers on policies bound by our Agency Operations. Other agency operating expenses include personnel expenses and general operating expenses. Corporate and other operating expenses are comprised primarily of outside legal fees, other professional fees, directors’ fees, management fees, salaries and benefits for holding company personnel, and taxes incurred which are not directly related to operations. Interest expense consists of interest paid on funds held on behalf of others, senior notes payable and junior subordinated debentures.
In managing the business and evaluating performance, our management focuses on measures such as premium growth, rate level changes, loss ratio, expense ratio, combined ratio, return on equity, growth in book value per share, and operating income (a non-GAAP measure), which we define as net income excluding after-tax realized investment gains (losses) and extraordinary items that do not reflect overall operating trends. Our management focuses on operating income as a useful measure of the net income attributable to the ongoing operations of the business. Operating income is not a substitute for the net income determined in accordance with GAAP, and investors should not place undue reliance on this measure.
Critical Accounting Estimates and Policies
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with GAAP, which requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions. We believe that of our significant accounting policies, the following may involve a higher degree of judgment and estimation.
Liability For Unpaid Losses And Loss Adjustment Expenses
Although variability is inherent in estimates, we believe that the liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses reflects our best estimate for future amounts needed to pay losses and related loss adjustment expenses and the impact of our reinsurance coverages with respect to insured events. The process of establishing the liability for property and casualty unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses is a complex process, requiring the use of informed estimates and judgments. This liability includes an amount determined on the basis of claim adjusters’ evaluations with respect to known insured events and an amount for losses incurred that have not been reported to us.
We are directly liable for losses and loss adjustment expenses under the terms of the insurance policies that we write. In many cases, several years may lapse between the occurrence of an insured loss, the reporting of the loss to us, and our payment of that loss. We reflect our liability for the ultimate payment of all incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses by establishing loss and loss adjustment expense reserves as balance sheet liabilities for both reported and unreported claims.
The method for determining our liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses includes, among other things, reviewing past loss experience and considering other factors such as legal, social and economic developments.
We use a variety of techniques to establish our liabilities for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses within each segment, all of which involve significant judgments and assumptions. Losses generated by business with common characteristics are aggregated into groups as losses are evaluated. For recent years, we generally combine actual loss data with losses that we anticipate to develop. For older years, we employ a variety of paid and incurred loss development tests. All of these techniques include detailed statistical analysis of past claim reporting, settlement activity, claim frequency and severity data, internal loss experience, the experience of policyholders and industry
21
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
experience. More judgmental techniques are used in lines when statistical data is insufficient or unavailable. Estimates reflect implicit or explicit assumptions regarding the effects of external factors that include economic and social inflation, judicial decisions, law changes and recent trends in these factors. The information obtained from the evaluation of each segment is used by management to select its best point estimate for loss and loss expense reserves.
We continually review these estimates and, based on new developments and information, we include adjustments of the probable ultimate liability in the operating results for the periods in which the adjustments are made. The establishment of loss and loss adjustment expense reserves makes no provision for the possible broadening of coverage by legislative action or judicial interpretation, or the emergence of new types of losses not sufficiently represented in our historical experience or that cannot yet be quantified. We regularly analyze our reserves and review pricing and reserving methodologies so that future adjustments to prior year reserves can be minimized. However, given the complexity of this process, reserves will require continual updates and the ultimate liability may be higher or lower than previously indicated. Change in estimates for loss and loss adjustment expense reserves, as required by SFAS No. 60, “Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises,” is recorded in the period that the change in these estimates is made. Other than the discount that was made effective upon our acquisition of Wind River Investment Corporation on September 5, 2003, we do not discount our loss reserves.
As mentioned in the preceding paragraph, the ultimate liability for losses and loss adjustment expenses may be higher or lower than previously indicated. The table below illustrates the sensitivity to a hypothetical change to our net loss and loss adjustment expense reserves as of June 30, 2006. The selected scenarios are not predictions of future events, but rather illustrative of the effect that such events may have on shareholders’ equity.
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Percentage | ||||||||||||
Balance of Net | Change In Net | Increase | ||||||||||
Loss and Net | Loss and Net | (Decrease) in | ||||||||||
Hypothetical Change in Net Loss and | Loss Adjustment | Loss Adjustment | Shareholders' | |||||||||
Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves | Expense Reserves | Expense Reserves | Equity (1) | |||||||||
7.5% increase | $ | 746,534 | $ | 52,084 | (6.4 | )% | ||||||
5.0% increase | 729,173 | 34,723 | (4.3 | )% | ||||||||
2.5% increase | 711,811 | 17,361 | (2.1 | )% | ||||||||
As recorded on June 30, 2006 | 694,450 | — | — | |||||||||
2.5% decrease | 677,089 | (17,361 | ) | 2.1 | % | |||||||
5.0% decrease | 659,728 | (34,723 | ) | 4.3 | % | |||||||
7.5% decrease | 642,366 | (52,084 | ) | 6.4 | % |
(1) | This presumes that the change in reserves is pro-rata across the entire portfolio of loss reserves for the purpose of determining the net effect on shareholders’ equity. |
Recoverability of Reinsurance Receivables
We regularly review the collectibility of our reinsurance receivables, and we include adjustments resulting from this review in earnings in the period in which the adjustment arises. A.M. Best ratings, financial history, and payment history with the reinsurers are several of the factors that we consider when judging collectibility. Changes in loss reserves can also affect the valuation of reinsurance recoverables if the change is related to loss reserves that are ceded to reinsurers. Certain amounts may be uncollectible if our reinsurers dispute a loss or if the reinsurer is unable to pay. If our reinsurer does not pay, we are still legally obligated to pay the liability.
Investments
The carrying amount of our investments approximates their estimated fair value. We regularly perform various analytical procedures with respect to our investments, including identifying any security where the fair value is below its cost. Upon identification of such securities, we perform a detailed review to determine whether the decline is considered other than temporary. This review includes an analysis of several factors, including but not limited to, the credit ratings and cash flows of the securities, and the magnitude and length of time that the fair value is below cost. The factors considered in reaching the conclusion that a decline below cost is other than temporary include, among others, whether (1) the issuer is in financial distress, (2) the investment is secured, (3) a significant
22
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
credit rating action occurred, (4) scheduled interest payments were delayed or missed, and (5) changes in laws or regulations have affected an issuer or industry. If the fair value of an investment falls below its cost and the decline is determined to be other than temporary, the amount of the decline is included in earnings as a realized loss in the period in which the impairment arose.
For equity securities, a decline in value is considered to be other than temporary if an unrealized loss has either (1) persisted for more than 12 consecutive months or (2) the value of the investment has been 20% or more below cost for six continuous months or more. For securities with significant declines in value for periods shorter than six months, the security is evaluated to determine whether the cost basis of the security should be written down to its fair value.
The following table contains an analysis of our securities with gross unrealized losses, categorized by the period that the securities were in a continuous loss position as of June 30, 2006:
Gross Unrealized Losses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost or | Six | Between | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in | Number of | Amortized | Months or | Seven Months | Greater than | |||||||||||||||||||||||
thousands) | Securities | Fair Value | Cost | Total | Less | and One Year | One Year (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Bonds | 589 | $ | 1,060,060 | $ | 1,095,817 | $ | 34,757 | $ | 7,858 | $ | 14,242 | $ | 13,657 | |||||||||||||||
Preferred Stock | 3 | 1,606 | 1,687 | 81 | 63 | 18 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | 26 | 14,155 | 14,956 | 801 | 9 | 792 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 35,639 | $ | 7,930 | $ | 15,052 | $ | 13,657 | |||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | At June 30, 2006, the Company had 386 bonds that were in an unrealized loss position for greater than one year. 96% of these securities are investment grade, and the remaining 4% are convertible securities. |
Subject to the risks and uncertainties in evaluating the impairment of a security’s value, the impairment evaluation conducted by us as of June 30, 2006, concluded the unrealized losses discussed above are not other than temporary impairments.
We recorded the following other than temporary losses on our investment portfolios for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005:
Quarter Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||||
Preferred stock | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 167 | $ | — | ||||||||
Common stock | 37 | 50 | 37 | 100 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 37 | $ | 50 | $ | 204 | $ | 100 | ||||||||
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
We use several techniques to value the recoverability of our intangible assets. Discounted cash flow and cost to replace methods were used to value agency relationships, customer contracts, and insurer relationships. State licenses were valued by comparing our licenses to comparable companies. Software was evaluated based on the cost to build and the cost to replace existing software.
Other intangible assets that are not deemed to have an indefinite useful life are amortized over their useful lives. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS 142”), we are required to perform a test for impairment of goodwill and other indefinite lived assets at least annually. We performed our annual impairment review of goodwill and other indefinite lived assets during the fourth quarter of 2005 and have concluded that no events have occurred that would indicate that goodwill and other indefinite lived assets were impaired as of June 30, 2006. Impairment is recognized if the carrying amount of the company is less than its fair value.
Taxation
We provide for income taxes in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”
23
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
(“SFAS 109”). Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized consistent with the asset and liability method required by SFAS 109. Our deferred tax assets and liabilities primarily result from temporary differences between the amounts recorded in our consolidated financial statements and the tax basis of our assets and liabilities.
At each balance sheet date, management assesses the need to establish a valuation allowance that reduces deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that all, or some portion, of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The current valuation allowance is based on all available information including our assessment of uncertain tax positions and projections of future taxable income from each tax-paying component in each jurisdiction, principally derived from business plans and available tax planning strategies. The deferred tax asset balance includes $13.0 million for the AMT carryforward and is analyzed regularly by management. Based on these analyses, we have determined that our AMT carryforward is recoverable. Projections of future taxable income incorporate several assumptions of future business and operations that are apt to differ from actual experience. If, in the future, our assumptions and estimates that resulted in our forecast of future taxable income for each tax-paying component prove to be incorrect, a valuation allowance could become necessary. This could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, and liquidity.
On an interim basis, we book our tax provision using the expected full year effective tax rate in accordance with the provisions of APB 28.
Our Business Segments
We evaluate the performance of our Insurance Operations and Agency Operations segments based on gross and net premiums written, revenues in the form of 1) net premiums earned and 2) agency commissions and fees, and expenses in the form of 1) net losses and loss adjustment expenses, 2) acquisition costs, 3) other underwriting expenses, and 4) other operating expenses.
We expect to add a new segment, Reinsurance Operations, as we complete the consolidation of our Non-U.S. Insurance Operations into a single Bermuda based entity that will focus on offering third party reinsurance products. We expect that the new entity will begin offering such products by year-end 2006.
24
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
The following table sets forth an analysis of financial data for our segments during the periods indicated:
Quarter Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||||
Insurance Operations premiums written: | ||||||||||||||||
Gross premiums written | $ | 167,295 | $ | 163,902 | $ | 326,853 | $ | 299,362 | ||||||||
Ceded premiums written | 24,607 | 27,608 | 48,828 | 53,547 | ||||||||||||
Net premiums written | $ | 142,688 | $ | 136,294 | $ | 278,025 | $ | 245,815 | ||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||
Insurance Operations | $ | 133,751 | $ | 119,802 | $ | 269,181 | $ | 221,914 | ||||||||
Agency Operations | 9,583 | 10,940 | 20,144 | 17,723 | ||||||||||||
Corporate | 17,932 | 11,508 | 31,654 | 22,760 | ||||||||||||
Subtotal | 161,266 | 142,250 | 320,979 | 262,397 | ||||||||||||
Intercompany eliminations | (779 | ) | (825 | ) | (1,793 | ) | (1,356 | ) | ||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 160,487 | $ | 141,425 | $ | 319,186 | $ | 261,041 | ||||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||
Insurance Operations | $ | 123,070 | $ | 106,300 | $ | 246,665 | $ | 199,573 | ||||||||
Agency Operations | 9,533 | 10,573 | 19,628 | 17,750 | ||||||||||||
Corporate | 6,666 | 6,813 | 13,492 | 12,271 | ||||||||||||
Subtotal | 139,269 | 123,686 | 279,785 | 229,594 | ||||||||||||
Intercompany eliminations | (1,307 | ) | (571 | ) | (1,659 | ) | (966 | ) | ||||||||
Net expenses | $ | 137,962 | $ | 123,115 | $ | 278,126 | $ | 228,628 | ||||||||
Income before income taxes: | ||||||||||||||||
Insurance Operations | $ | 10,681 | $ | 13,502 | $ | 22,516 | $ | 22,341 | ||||||||
Agency Operations | 50 | 367 | 516 | (27 | ) | |||||||||||
Corporate | 11,266 | 4,695 | 18,162 | 10,489 | ||||||||||||
Subtotal | 21,997 | 18,564 | 41,194 | 32,803 | ||||||||||||
Intercompany eliminations | 528 | (254 | ) | (134 | ) | (390 | ) | |||||||||
Total income before income taxes | $ | 22,525 | $ | 18,310 | $ | 41,060 | $ | 32,413 | ||||||||
Insurance combined ratio analysis: (1) | ||||||||||||||||
Before purchase accounting adjustments: | ||||||||||||||||
Net losses and loss adjustment expense ratio | 60.2 | 56.1 | 59.2 | 57.1 | ||||||||||||
Other underwriting expense ratio | 31.2 | 33.1 | 32.0 | 33.3 | ||||||||||||
Combined ratio | 91.4 | 89.2 | 91.2 | 90.4 | ||||||||||||
Impact of purchase accounting adjustments | ||||||||||||||||
Net losses and loss adjustment expense ratio | — | 3.3 | — | 3.7 | ||||||||||||
Other underwriting expense ratio | — | (4.0 | ) | — | (4.3 | ) | ||||||||||
Combined ratio | — | (0.7 | ) | — | (0.6 | ) | ||||||||||
As reported, after purchase accounting adjustments: | ||||||||||||||||
Net losses and loss adjustment expense ratio | 60.2 | 59.4 | 59.2 | 60.8 | ||||||||||||
Other underwriting expense ratio | 31.2 | 29.1 | 32.0 | 29.0 | ||||||||||||
Combined ratio | 91.4 | 88.5 | 91.2 | 89.8 | ||||||||||||
(1) | Our insurance combined ratios are non-GAAP financial measures that are generally viewed as indicators of underwriting profitability. The net losses and loss adjustment expense ratio is the ratio of net losses and loss adjustment expenses to net premiums earned. The underwriting expense ratio is the ratio of acquisition costs and other underwriting expenses to net premiums earned. The combined ratio is the ratio of the sum of net losses, loss adjustment expenses, acquisition costs, and other underwriting expenses to net premiums earned. |
Results of Operations
Quarter ended June 30, 2006 Compared with the Quarter ended June 30, 2005
Premiums
Gross premiums written, which represent the amount received or to be received for insurance policies written without reduction for acquisition costs, reinsurance costs or other deductions, were $167.3 million for the quarter
25
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
ended June 30, 2006, compared with $163.9 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, an increase of $3.4 million or 2.1%. A breakdown of gross premiums written by product class is as follows:
Quarter Ended | Quarter Ended | Increase / | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | June 30, 2006 | June 30, 2005 | (Decrease) | |||||||||
Penn-America product | $ | 106,370 | $ | 105,629 | $ | 741 | ||||||
United National Class Specific (1) | 29,740 | 29,106 | 634 | |||||||||
United National Professional | 17,563 | 18,956 | (1,393 | ) | ||||||||
United National Brokerage | 6,717 | 3,361 | 3,356 | |||||||||
United National Umbrella / Excess | 6,905 | 6,850 | 55 | |||||||||
Total United National products | 60,925 | 58,273 | 2,652 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 167,295 | $ | 163,902 | $ | 3,393 | ||||||
(1) | This product class includes gross written premiums of the Non-U.S. Insurance Operations of $(0.01) million and $0.6 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. |
• | Penn-America gross premiums written increased slightly as increased property premium were offset by a reduction in casualty premium | ||
• | United National gross premiums written increased due to an increase in property brokerage premium partially offset by a decline in the professional product class resulting from a reduction in public officials premium. |
Net premiums written, which equal gross premiums written less ceded premiums written, were $142.7 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, compared with $136.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, an increase of $6.4 million or 4.7%. The ratio of net premiums written to gross premiums written was 85.3% for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 and 83.2% for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. A breakdown of net premiums written by product class is as follows:
Quarter Ended | Quarter Ended | Increase / | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | June 30, 2006 | June 30, 2005 | (Decrease) | |||||||||
Penn-America product | $ | 96,746 | $ | 93,701 | $ | 3,045 | ||||||
United National Class Specific (1) | 24,072 | 22,053 | 2,019 | |||||||||
United National Professional | 15,228 | 16,387 | (1,159 | ) | ||||||||
United National Brokerage | 4,712 | 2,896 | 1,816 | |||||||||
United National Umbrella / Excess | 1,930 | 1,257 | 673 | |||||||||
Total United National products | 45,942 | 42,593 | 3,349 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 142,688 | $ | 136,294 | $ | 6,394 | ||||||
(1) | This product class includes net premiums written of the Non-U.S. Insurance Operations of $(0.01) million and $0.5 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. |
• | Penn-America net premiums written increased due to an increase in property premium and increased retentions relating to Penn-America’s casualty reinsurance treaties. | ||
• | United National net premiums written increased primarily due to an increase in property brokerage premium, increased retentions relating to United National’s casualty reinsurance treaties, and new product offerings within our class specific product class partially offset by a decline in our professional product class resulting from a reduction in public officials premium. |
Net premiums earned were $133.8 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, compared with $119.8 million for the quarter June 30, 2005, an increase of $13.9 million or 11.6%. Net premiums earned increased for the reasons noted above in net premiums written.
26
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
Agency Commission and Fee Revenues
Agency commission and fee revenues before intercompany eliminations were $9.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, compared with $10.9 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. Agency commission and fee revenues after intercompany eliminations were $8.8 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, compared with $10.1 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, a decrease of $1.3 million or 13.0%. These decreases were primarily due to the sale of Stratus Insurance Services, Inc., which were sold effective December 31, 2005, and run-off of Penn Independent’s claims administration contract.
Net Investment Income
Gross investment income, excluding realized gains and losses, was $19.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, compared with $12.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, an increase of $6.7 million or 53.4%. The increase was primarily due to increasing investment yields and an increase in cash and invested assets. Gross investment income in 2006 also included $2.0 million in distributions from our limited partnership investments compared to distributions of $1.0 million in 2005. Cash and invested assets grew to $1,498.7 million as of June 30, 2006, from $1,424.2 million as of December 31, 2005, an increase of $74.5 million.
The average duration of our bonds increased to 4.1 years as of June 30, 2006, compared with 3.8 years as of June 30, 2005 due to purchases of bonds with longer durations. At June 30, 2006, our book yield on our bonds, not including cash, was 4.64% compared with 4.06% at June 30, 2005.
Investment expenses were $1.4 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, compared with $1.5 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, a decrease of $0.1 million or 6.7%.
Net Realized Investment Gains (Losses)
Net realized investment losses were $0.004 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, compared with net realized investment gains of $0.4 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. The net realized investment losses for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 consist primarily of net gains of $0.1 million relative to our options portfolio, net losses of $0.1 million relative to bond portfolios, and net gains of $0.1 million relative to our equity portfolios. The net realized investment gain for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 consist of net gains of $0.8 million relative to our bond portfolios, net losses of $0.3 million relative to our options portfolio, and net losses of $0.1 million relative to our equity portfolios.
Net Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses
Net losses and loss adjustment expenses were $80.5 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, compared with $71.2 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, an increase of $9.3 million or 13.0%. The increase in incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses is attributable to growth in earned premium and an increase in our Penn-America product class property loss ratio. During the quarter ended June 30, 2006, in the aggregate, we did not record any favorable or unfavorable loss development relative to prior accident years.
The loss ratio for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 was 60.2% compared with 59.4% for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. The loss ratio is calculated by dividing net losses and loss adjustment expenses by net premiums earned. Excluding the impact of purchase accounting adjustments, the loss ratio for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 was 56.1%. There were no purchase accounting adjustments that impacted the loss ratio for the quarter ended June 30, 2006. The increase in the loss ratio from 56.1% to 60.2% is primarily due to an increase in our Penn-America product class property loss ratio.
27
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
The following table shows our estimated gross losses incurred related to the 2005 hurricanes as of June 30, 2006, March 31, 2006:
(Dollars in thousands) | June 30, 2006 | March 31, 2006 | Increase/ (Decrease | |||||||||
Katrina first landfall | $ | 650 | $ | 650 | $ | — | ||||||
Katrina second landfall | 36,929 | 36,927 | 2 | |||||||||
Rita | 4,500 | 4,508 | (8 | ) | ||||||||
Wilma | 8,900 | 8,897 | 3 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 50,979 | $ | 50,982 | $ | (3 | ) | |||||
The following table shows our estimated net losses incurred related to the 2005 hurricanes as of June 30, 2006 and March 31, 2006:
(Dollars in thousands) | June 30, 2006 | March 31, 2006 | Increase/ (Decrease | |||||||||
Katrina first landfall | $ | 207 | $ | 194 | $ | 13 | ||||||
Katrina second landfall | 5,833 | 5,837 | (4 | ) | ||||||||
Rita | 4,100 | 4,108 | (8 | ) | ||||||||
Wilma | 2,000 | 1,997 | 3 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 12,140 | $ | 12,136 | $ | 4 | ||||||
In total 1,644 claims have been reported for hurricanes Katrina, Rita, and Wilma. 150 claims remain open as of August 7, 2006.
For a description of our catastrophe reinsurance agreements and our coverage under those agreements, see footnote 3 in the notes to the consolidated financial statements in Item I of Part I of this report.
Acquisition Costs and Other Underwriting Expenses
Acquisition costs and other underwriting expenses, net of intercompany eliminations, were $41.8 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, compared with $34.9 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, an increase of $6.9 million or 19.7%. This increase is primarily due to a $6.7 million increase in acquisition costs.
• | The increase in acquisition expense is primarily due to the fact that Penn-America Insurance Companies’ deferred acquisition costs were written off at January 24, 2005 as a result of their merger with us, thereby reducing acquisition costs in 2005. | ||
• | Other underwriting expenses increased $0.2 million. |
Agency Commission and Operating Expenses
Agency commission and operating expenses before intercompany eliminations were $9.5 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, compared with $10.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. Agency commission and operating expenses after intercompany eliminations were $8.9 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, compared with $10.2 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, a decrease of $1.3 million or 12.9%. This decrease was primarily due to the sale of Stratus Insurance Services, Inc., which was sold effective December 31, 2005. Commission expense is closely correlated to agency revenues.
Corporate and Other Operating Expenses
Corporate and other operating expenses consist of outside legal fees, other professional fees, directors’ fees, management fees, salaries and benefits for holding company personnel, and taxes incurred which are not directly related to operations. Corporate and other operating expenses were $3.9 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, compared with $4.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, a decrease of $0.7 million. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in general insurance, legal fees, and other miscellaneous operating expenses.
28
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
Expense and Combined Ratios
Our expense ratio, which is calculated by dividing the sum of acquisition costs and other underwriting expenses by premiums earned, was 31.2% for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, compared with 29.1% for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. Excluding the impact of purchase accounting adjustments, the expense ratio for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 was 33.1%. There were no purchase accounting adjustments that impacted the expense ratio for the quarter ended June 30, 2006. The increase in the expense ratio is primarily attributable to the factors described in “Acquisition Costs and Other Underwriting Expenses.” Commission expense, acquisition costs, and other underwriting expenses have decreased as a percent of earned premium compared to the same period in 2005.
Our combined ratio was 91.4% for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, compared with 88.5% for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. Excluding the impact of purchase accounting adjustments, the combined ratio for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 was 89.2%. This increase was primarily due to an increase in the loss ratio. There were no purchase accounting adjustments that impacted the combined ratio for the quarter ended June 30, 2006.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $3.0 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, compared with $2.2 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, an increase of $0.8 million or 35.7%. This increase is primarily due to increases in interest rates on the junior subordinated debt and interest expense on the $90.0 million private placement debt, which was borrowed on July 20, 2005, offset by a decrease in interest expense related to the retirement of $72.8 million of the Ball family trust senior notes, which were retired on that same date.
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
Income tax expense was $2.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, compared with $0.1 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. See footnote 4 in the notes to the consolidated financial statements in Item I of Part I of this report for a comparison of income tax expense between periods. To compute our income tax expense, we apply our anticipated effective year end tax rate against our pretax income excluding realized gains and add actual tax on realized gains to that result. Our pretax income was $22.5 million and $18.3 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Our effective tax rate for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, was 10.3%, compared with an effective rate of 0.8% for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. The Company reforecasted its 2006 results during the second quarter of 2006 and re-estimated the annual tax rate at 8.8%, excluding net realized investments gains and losses. During the first quarter of 2006, the Company estimated its effective 2006 effective tax rate would be 7.0%. The effective rates differed from the weighted average expected rate of 16.0% and 7.9% for the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, due in part to investments in tax-exempt securities.
We have an AMT credit carryforward of $13.0 million as of June 30, 2006 that, subject to statutory limitations, can be carried forward indefinitely.
Equity in Net Income of Partnerships
Equity in net income of partnerships was $0.04 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, compared with $0.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, a decrease of $0.3 million. The decrease is due to the performance of a limited partnership investment which invests mainly in high yield bonds.
Net Income and Operating Income
The factors described above resulted in net income of $20.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, compared to net income of $18.5 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, and increase of $1.8 million or 9.7%. Operating income was $20.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, compared with operating income of $18.2 million for quarter ended June 30, 2005, an increase of $2.1 million or 11.5%. Operating income is a non-GAAP financial measure used by management as a measure of our performance. It is calculated as net income less after-tax realized investment gains and losses less any extraordinary gains or losses. Operating income for 2006 is equal to 2006 net income less $0.07 million for after-tax realized investment gains. Operating income for 2005 is equal to 2005 net income plus $0.3 million for after-tax realized investment losses.
29
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
A reconciliation of operating income to net income for the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 is as follows:
Quarter Ended | Quarter Ended | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | June 30, 2006 | June 30, 2005 | ||||||
Operating income | $ | 20,327 | $ | 18,187 | ||||
Adjustments: | ||||||||
Net realized investment gains (losses), net of tax | (73 | ) | 269 | |||||
Net income | $ | 20,254 | $ | 18,456 | ||||
Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 Compared with the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005
Premiums
Gross premiums written, which represent the amount received or to be received for insurance policies written without reduction for acquisition costs, reinsurance costs or other deductions, were $326.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared with $299.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, an increase of $27.5 million or 9.2%. A breakdown of gross premiums written by product class is as follows:
Six Months Ended | Six Months Ended | Increase / | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | June 30, 2006 | June 30, 2005 | (Decrease) | |||||||||
Penn-America product | $ | 206,041 | $ | 183,949 | $ | 22,092 | ||||||
United National Class Specific (1) | 61,635 | 58,816 | 2,819 | |||||||||
United National Professional | 33,825 | 36,077 | (2,252 | ) | ||||||||
United National Brokerage | 12,444 | 6,331 | 6,113 | |||||||||
United National Umbrella / Excess | 12,908 | 14,189 | (1,281 | ) | ||||||||
Total United National products | 120,812 | 115,413 | 5,399 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 326,853 | $ | 299,362 | $ | 27,491 | ||||||
(1) | This product class includes gross written premiums of the Non-U.S. Insurance Operations of $0.05 million and $2.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. |
• | Penn-America gross premiums written increased primarily as a result of the inclusion of premium written by the Penn-America Insurance Companies for a full six months in 2006 whereas our 2005 results only included premium written by the Penn-America Insurance Companies from January 25, 2005, the date of their merger with us. | ||
• | United National gross premiums written increased primarily due to an increase in property brokerage premium. |
30
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
Net premiums written, which equal gross premiums written less ceded premiums written, were $278.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared with $245.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, an increase of $32.2 million or 13.1%. The ratio of net premiums written to gross premiums written was 85.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 82.1% for the first six months of 2005. A breakdown of net premiums written by product class is as follows:
Six Months Ended | Six Months Ended | Increase / | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | June 30, 2006 | June 30, 2005 | (Decrease) | |||||||||
Penn-America product | $ | 187,034 | $ | 163,180 | $ | 23,854 | ||||||
United National Class Specific (1) | 49,721 | 43,622 | 6,099 | |||||||||
United National Professional | 29,187 | 30,903 | (1,716 | ) | ||||||||
United National Brokerage | 9,011 | 5,451 | 3,560 | |||||||||
United National Umbrella / Excess | 3,072 | 2,659 | 413 | |||||||||
Total United National products | 90,991 | 82,635 | 8,356 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 278,025 | $ | 245,815 | $ | 32,210 | ||||||
(1) | This product class includes net premiums written of the Non-U.S. Insurance Operations of $0.04 million and $1.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. |
• | Penn-America net premiums written increased primarily resulting from the inclusion of premium written by the Penn-America Insurance Companies for a full six months in 2006 whereas our 2005 results only included premium written by the Penn-America Insurance Companies from January 25, 2005, the date of their merger with us, combined with an increase in property premium and increase retentions relating to Penn-America’s casualty reinsurance treaties. | ||
• | United National net premiums written increased primarily due an increase in property brokerage premium, increased retentions relating to United National’s casualty reinsurance treaties, and new product offerings within our class specific product class partially offset by a decline in our professional product class resulting from a reduction in public officials premium. |
Net premiums earned were $269.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared with $221.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, an increase of $47.3 million or 21.3%. Net premiums earned increased for the reasons noted above in net premiums written.
Agency Commission and Fee Revenues
Agency commission and fee revenues before intercompany eliminations were $20.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared with $17.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. Agency commission and fee revenues after intercompany eliminations were $18.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared with $16.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, an increase of $2.0 million or 12.1%. These increases were primarily due to the inclusion of Penn Independent for a full six months in 2006 offset slightly by the sale of Stratus Insurance Services, Inc., which was sold effective December 31, 2005. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, the results of Penn Independent are only included from the date of its acquisition, January 25, 2005.
Net Investment Income
Gross investment income, excluding realized gains and losses, was $34.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared with $25.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, an increase of $8.6 million or 33.2%. The increase was primarily due to increasing investment yields, an increase in cash and invested assets, and the inclusion of Penn-America Insurance Companies and Penn Independent for a full six months in 2006. Gross investment income in the first six months of 2006 also included $2.4 million in distributions from our limited partnership investments compared to distributions of $4.5 million in the first six months of 2005. Cash and invested assets grew to $1,498.7 million as of June 30, 2006, from $1,424.2 million as of December 31, 2005, an increase of $74.5 million.
31
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
The average duration of our bonds approximated 4.1 years as of June 30, 2006, compared with 3.8 years as of June 30, 2005. Our embedded book yield on our bonds, not including cash, was 4.64% at June 30, 2006, compared with 4.06% at June 30, 2005.
Investment expenses were $2.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005.
Net Realized Investment Gains (Losses)
Net realized investment gains were $0.04 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared with net realized investment losses of $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The net realized investment gains for the six months ended June 30, 2006 consist primarily of net gains of $0.6 million relative to our options portfolio, net losses of $0.2 million relative to our bond portfolios, and net losses of $0.3 million relative to our equity portfolios. The net realized investment losses for the six months ended June 30, 2005 consist of net losses of $0.9 million relative to our options portfolio, net losses of $0.2 million relative to our equity portfolios, and net gains of $0.9 million relative to our bond portfolios. The equity portfolios include a $0.2 million impairment loss.
Net Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses
Net losses and loss adjustment expenses were $159.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared with $134.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, an increase of $24.6 million or 18.3%. The increase in incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses is attributable to growth in earned premium and the inclusion of Penn-America for a full six months in 2006 as well as an increase in the Penn-America product class property and casualty loss ratios. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, in the aggregate, we did not record any favorable or unfavorable loss development relative to prior accident years.
The loss ratio for the six months ended June 30, 2006 was 59.2% compared with 60.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The loss ratio is calculated by dividing net losses and loss adjustment expenses by net premiums earned. Excluding the impact of purchase accounting adjustments, the loss ratio for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was 57.1%. There were no purchase accounting adjustments that impacted the loss ratio for the six months ended June 30, 2006. The increase in the loss ratio from 57.1% to 59.2% is primarily due to the factors noted above.
The following table shows our estimated gross losses incurred related to the 2005 hurricanes as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005:
(Dollars in thousands) | June 30, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | Increase/ (Decrease) | |||||||||
Katrina first landfall | $ | 650 | $ | 1,250 | $ | 600 | ||||||
Katrina second landfall | 36,929 | 30,600 | 6,329 | |||||||||
Rita | 4,500 | 3,400 | 1,100 | |||||||||
Wilma | 8,900 | 7,700 | 1,200 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 50,979 | $ | 42,950 | $ | 8,029 | ||||||
The following table shows our estimated net losses incurred related to the 2005 hurricanes as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005:
(Dollars in thousands) | June 30, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | Increase/ (Decrease) | |||||||||
Katrina first landfall | $ | 207 | $ | 560 | $ | (353 | ) | |||||
Katrina second landfall | 5,833 | 2,400 | 3,433 | |||||||||
Rita | 4,100 | 3,000 | 1,100 | |||||||||
Wilma | 2,000 | 2,000 | — | |||||||||
Total | $ | 12,140 | $ | 7,960 | $ | 4,180 | ||||||
During the first quarter of 2006 within our property lines, we updated our previous estimate of losses relative to hurricanes Katrina, Rita, and Wilma and increased our estimate of net losses by $4.2 million. In addition to the losses, an additional $0.2 million of reinstatement costs were incurred during the six months ended June 30, 2006. This loss was offset by continued favorable development of our 2005 accident year non-catastrophe property losses. With respect to our hurricane losses, we have received over 1,100 claims related to Katrina’s second landfall, and the
32
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
actual adjustment process has resulted in a higher level of damageability than was reflected in our original estimates. As a result of the increase in catastrophe reserves, we have exceeded the limits of our $25.0 million in excess of $5.0 million catastrophe reinsurance coverage for the coverage period ended May 31, 2006. In total 1,644 claims have been reported for hurricanes Katrina, Rita, and Wilma. 150 claims remain open as of August 7, 2006.
For a description of our catastrophe reinsurance agreements and our coverage under those agreements, see footnote 3 in the notes to the consolidated financial statements in Item I of Part I of this report.
Acquisition Costs and Other Underwriting Expenses
Acquisition costs and other underwriting expenses, net of intercompany eliminations, were $86.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared with $64.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, an increase of $21.6 million or 33.6%. This increase can primarily be attributed to a $21.3 million increase in acquisition costs.
• | The $21.3 million increase in acquisition costs was primarily the result of the fact that $14.1 million of Penn-America Insurance Companies’ deferred acquisition costs were written off as a result of its merger with us on January 24, 2005. In addition, 2006 includes Penn-America’s results for a full six months. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, the results of Penn-America are only included from the date of its acquisition, January 25, 2005. | ||
• | Other underwriting expenses increased $0.3 million. |
Agency Commission and Operating Expenses
Agency commission and operating expenses before intercompany eliminations were $19.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared with $17.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. Agency commission and operating expenses after intercompany eliminations were $18.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared with $17.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, an increase of $1.6 million or 9.4%. This increase was primarily due to the inclusion of Penn Independent’s results for the full six months in 2006, offset slightly by the sale of Stratus Insurance Services, Inc., which was sold effective December 31, 2005. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, the results of Penn Independent are only included from the date of its acquisition, January 25, 2005. Commission expense is closely correlated to agency revenues.
Corporate and Other Operating Expenses
Corporate and other operating expenses consist of outside legal fees, other professional fees, directors’ fees, management fees, salaries and benefits for holding company personnel, and taxes incurred which are not directly related to operations. Corporate and other operating expenses were $8.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005. Increases in salaries and benefits in 2006 from the prior year were offset by decreases in general insurance, legal fees, corporate structure costs, and Sarbanes-Oxley consulting fees.
Expense and Combined Ratios
Our expense ratio, which is calculated by dividing the sum of acquisition costs and other underwriting expenses by premiums earned, was 32.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared with 29.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2005. Excluding the impact of purchase accounting adjustments, the expense ratio for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was 33.3%. There were no purchase accounting adjustments that impacted the expense ratio for the six months ended June 30, 2006. Exclusive of purchase accounting adjustments, acquisition costs and other underwriting expenses have declined as a percentage of earned premium for the six months ending June 30, 2006 compared to the same period in 2005 as a result of a reduction in commission and other acquisition expense.
Our combined ratio was 91.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared with 89.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2005. Excluding the impact of purchase accounting adjustments, the combined ratio for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was 90.4%. This increase was primarily due to an increase in the loss ratio. There were no purchase accounting adjustments that impacted the combined ratio for the six months ended June 30, 2006.
33
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $5.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared with $4.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, an increase of $1.6 million or 39.0%. This increase is primarily due to increases in interest rates on the junior subordinated debt and interest expense on the $90.0 million private placement debt, which was borrowed on July 20, 2005, offset by a decrease in interest expense related to the retirement of $72.8 million of the Ball family trust senior notes, which were retired on that same date.
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
Income tax expense was $3.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared with $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. See footnote 4 in the notes to the consolidated financial statements in Item I of Part I of this report for a comparison of income tax expense between periods. To compute our income tax expense, we apply our anticipated effective year end tax rate against our pretax income excluding realized gains and add actual tax on realized gains to that result. Our pretax income was $41.1 million and $32.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Our effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2006, was 8.8%, compared with an effective rate of 0.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The effective rates differed from the weighted average expected rate of 15.2% and 6.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, due in part to investments in tax-exempt securities.
We have an AMT credit carryforward of $13.0 million as of June 30, 2006 that, subject to statutory limitations, can be carried forward indefinitely.
Equity in Net Earnings of Partnerships
Equity in net earnings of partnerships was $0.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared with $0.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, an increase of $0.2 million. The increase is primarily attributable to the performance of a limited partnership investment which invests mainly in high yield bond securities.
Extraordinary Gain
The extraordinary gain of $1.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 represents the recognition of tax benefits derived from acquisition costs incurred in connection with our acquisition of Wind River Investment Corporation in 2003, which are currently considered to be deductible for federal tax purposes.
Net Income and Operating Income
The factors described above resulted in net income of $38.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to net income of $34.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, an increase of $4.0 million or 11.8%. Operating income was $38.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared with operating income of $32.7 million for six months ended June 30, 2005, an increase of $5.3 million or 16.2%. Operating income is a non-GAAP financial measure used by management as a measure of our performance. It is calculated as net income less after-tax realized investment gains and losses less any extraordinary gains or losses. Operating income for 2006 is equal to 2006 net income less $0.01 million for after-tax realized investment gains. Operating income for 2005 is equal to 2005 net income less $0.1 million for after-tax realized investment losses and a $1.4 million extraordinary gain recorded in connection with the acquisition of Wind River Investment Corporation.
34
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
A reconciliation of operating income to net income for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 is as follows:
Six Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | June 30, 2006 | June 30, 2005 | ||||||
Operating income | $ | 38,046 | $ | 32,728 | ||||
Adjustments: | ||||||||
Net realized investment gains (losses), net of tax | (14 | ) | (107 | ) | ||||
Extraordinary gain | — | 1,426 | ||||||
Total after-tax adjustments | (14 | ) | 1,319 | |||||
Net income | $ | 38,032 | $ | 34,047 | ||||
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Sources and Uses of Funds
United America Indemnity is a holding company. Its principal asset is its ownership of the shares of its direct and indirect subsidiaries, including United National Insurance Company, Diamond State Insurance Company, United National Specialty Insurance Company, United National Casualty Insurance Company, Wind River Barbados, Wind River Bermuda, Penn-America Insurance Company, Penn-Star Insurance Company, Penn-Patriot Insurance Company, and Penn Independent Corporation.
United America Indemnity’s principal source of cash to meet short-term and long-term liquidity needs, including the payment of dividends to stockholders and corporate expenses, includes dividends and other permitted disbursements from Wind River Barbados, which in turn is largely dependent on dividends and other payments from Wind River Bermuda, the Luxembourg Companies, the United National Insurance Companies, the Penn-America Insurance Companies, and Penn Independent Corporation. The principal sources of funds at these direct and indirect subsidiaries include underwriting operations, commissions, service fees, finance income, investment income and proceeds from sales and redemptions of investments. Funds are used principally by these operating subsidiaries to pay claims and operating expenses, to make debt payments, to purchase investments and to make dividend payments. United America Indemnity’s future liquidity is dependent on the ability of its subsidiaries to pay dividends. United America Indemnity has no planned capital expenditures that could have a material impact on its long-term liquidity needs.
The United National Insurance Companies and the Penn-America Insurance Companies are restricted by statute as to the amount of dividends that they may pay without the prior approval of regulatory authorities. The United National Insurance Companies and the Penn-America Insurance Companies may pay dividends without advance regulatory approval only out of unassigned surplus. For 2006, the maximum amount of distributions that could be paid by the United National Insurance Companies as dividends under applicable laws and regulations without regulatory approval is approximately $36.0 million. For 2006, the maximum amount of distributions that could be paid by the Penn-America Insurance Companies as dividends under applicable laws and regulations without regulatory approval is approximately $22.0 million, including $7.2 million that would be distributed to United National Insurance Company or its subsidiary, Penn Independent Corporation, based on the December 31, 2005 ownership percentages. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the United National Insurance Companies and the Penn-America Insurance Companies paid dividends of $5.0 million and $7.0 million, respectively. In July 2006, the United National Insurance Companies and the Penn-America Insurance Companies declared dividends of $2.5 million and $2.8 million, respectively, to be paid to the shareholders of record as of July 26, 2006 on or after August 8, 2006.
For 2006, we believe that Wind River Barbados and Wind River Bermuda should have sufficient liquidity and solvency to pay dividends. In the future, we anticipate paying dividends from our Bermuda operations to fund obligations of United America Indemnity, Ltd. Wind River Bermuda is prohibited, without the approval of the Bermuda Monetary Authority (“BMA”), from reducing by 15% or more its total statutory capital as set out in its previous year’s financial statements, and any application for such approval must include such information as the BMA may require. Wind River Bermuda can currently pay a dividend of up to $17.2 million without requesting BMA approval. We expect its dividend paying capacity will increase once Wind River Bermuda and Wind River
35
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
Barbados are combined into a single entity. Wind River Bermuda and Wind River Barbados have not declared or paid dividends in 2006.
Surplus Levels
Each company in our U.S. Insurance Operations is required by law to maintain a certain minimum level of policyholders’ surplus on a statutory basis. Policyholders’ surplus is calculated by subtracting total liabilities from total assets. The NAIC adopted risk-based capital standards designed to identify property and casualty insurers that may be inadequately capitalized based on inherent risks of each insurer’s assets and liabilities and mix of net premiums written. Insurers falling below a calculated threshold may be subject to varying degrees of regulatory action. Based on the standards currently adopted, each company in our U.S. Insurance Operations capital and surplus are in excess of the prescribed minimum company action level risk-based capital requirements.
Cash Flows
Sources of funds consist primarily of net premiums written, investment income, and maturing investments. Funds are used primarily to pay claims and operating expenses and to purchase investments.
Our reconciliation of net income to cash provided from operations is generally influenced by the following:
• | the fact that we collect premiums in advance of losses paid; | ||
• | the timing of our settlements with our reinsurers; and | ||
• | the timing of our loss payments. |
Net cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $92.2 million and $60.4 million, respectively. The increase in cash flows of approximately $31.8 million from the prior year was primarily a net result of the following items: 1) an increase in net premiums collected of $40.8 million, offset by an increase in net losses paid of $6.0 million and an increase in acquisition costs and other underwriting expenses of $14.1 million; 2) an increase in agency commission and operating revenues of $6.2 million, offset by an increase in agency commission and operating expense of $1.6 million; 3) an increase in net investment income collected of $11.0 million; and 4) an increase in interest paid of $3.4 million.
See the consolidated statement of cash flows in the financial statements in Item I of Part I of this report for details concerning our investing and financing activities.
Liquidity
Each company in our U.S. Insurance Operations and our Non-U.S. Insurance Operations maintains sufficient liquidity to pay claims through cash generated by operations and investments in liquid investments. At June 30, 2006, United America Indemnity had cash and cash equivalents of $137.9 million.
The United National Insurance Companies participate in an intercompany pooling arrangement whereby premiums, losses, and expenses are shared pro rata among the members of the group. United National Insurance Company is not an authorized reinsurer in all states. As a result, any losses and unearned premium that are ceded to United National Insurance Company by the other companies in the group must be collateralized. The state insurance departments that regulate the parties to the intercompany pooling agreements require United National Insurance Company to place assets on deposit subject to trust agreements for the protection of other group members.
There are two intercompany pooling agreements in place for the United National Insurance Companies. The first pooling agreement governs policies that were written prior to July 1, 2002. The second pooling agreement governs policies that are written on or after July 1, 2002. The method by which intercompany reinsurance is ceded is different for each pool. In the first pool, the United National Insurance Companies cede all business to United National Insurance Company. United National Insurance Company cedes in turn to external reinsurers. The remaining net premiums retained are allocated to the companies in the group according to their respective pool
36
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
participation percentages. In the second pool, each company in the group first cedes to external reinsurers. The remaining net is ceded to United National Insurance Company where the net premiums written of the group are pooled and reallocated to the group based on their respective participation percentages. The second pool requires less trust funding by United National Insurance Company as a result of it assuming less business from the other group members. United National Insurance Company only has to fund the portion that is ceded to it after cessions have occurred with external reinsurers. United National Insurance Company retains 80.0% of the risk associated with each pool.
The Penn-America Insurance Companies participate in an intercompany pooling arrangement whereby premiums, losses, and expenses are shared pro rata among the members of the group. Penn-Star Insurance Company is not an authorized reinsurer in all states. As a result, any losses and unearned premium that are ceded to Penn-Star Insurance Company by the other group members must be collateralized. The state insurance departments that regulate the parties to the intercompany pooling agreements require Penn-Star Insurance Company to place assets on deposit subject to trust agreements for the protection of other group members.
The United National Insurance Companies have entered into a quota share arrangement with Wind River Barbados and Wind River Bermuda. This reinsurance arrangement resulted in 45% and 15% of our net retained insurance liability on new and renewal business bound January 1, 2004 through April 30, 2004 being ceded to Wind River Barbados and Wind River Bermuda, respectively. The agreement also stipulates that 45% and 15% of the United National Insurance Companies’ December 31, 2003 net unearned premium be ceded to Wind River Barbados and Wind River Bermuda, respectively.
The quota share arrangement was modified as of May 1, 2004. The new arrangement stipulates that 60% of the United National Insurance Companies’ net retained insurance liability on new and renewal business bound May 1, 2004 and later be ceded to Wind River Bermuda. The modified arrangement also stipulates that 60% of the United National Insurance Companies’ April 30, 2004 unearned premium be ceded to Wind River Bermuda. Also, as a result of the modification, none of the net retained liability on new and renewal business bound May 1, 2004 and later by the United National Insurance Companies has been directly assumed by Wind River Barbados.
Reinsurance premiums ceded by the United National Insurance Companies through January 2005 were paid to Wind River Bermuda and Wind River Barbados. Since Wind River Barbados and Wind River Bermuda are not authorized reinsurers in the United States, the insurance laws and regulations of Pennsylvania, Indiana and Wisconsin require the establishment of reinsurance trusts for the benefit of the United National Insurance Companies. The funding requirement includes the amount due on ceded paid loss and loss adjustment expenses, ceded unearned premium reserves, and ceded loss and loss adjustment reserves.
The Penn-America Insurance Companies entered into a quota share arrangement with Wind River Bermuda. This reinsurance arrangement resulted in 30% of the Penn-America Insurance Companies’ net retained insurance liability on new and renewal business bound after February 1, 2005 and later being ceded to Wind River Bermuda. This agreement also stipulates that 30% of Penn-America Insurance Companies’ February 1, 2005 net unearned premium be ceded to Wind River Bermuda.
Wind River Bermuda and Wind River Barbados have each established independent reinsurance trust accounts for the benefit of each of the U.S. Insurance Subsidiaries. We invest the funds in securities that have durations that closely match the expected duration of the liabilities assumed. We believe that each of Wind River Bermuda and Wind River Barbados will have sufficient liquidity to pay claims prospectively.
All trusts that we are required to maintain as a result of the above mentioned pooling agreements and quota share arrangements are adequately funded.
Effective January 1, 2005, Wind River Barbados entered into a quota share reinsurance agreement with Wind River Bermuda. Under the terms of this reinsurance agreement, Wind River Barbados assumed 35% of Wind River Bermuda’s net retained insurance liability on losses occurring on or after January 1, 2005 on all new and renewal insurance and reinsurance business effective on or after January 1, 2005.
We expect that in 2006 our U.S. Insurance Operations and our Non-U.S. Insurance Operations will have positive
37
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
cash flow and will have sufficient liquidity to pay claims. We monitor our portfolios to assure liability and investment durations are closely matched.
Prospectively, as bonds mature and new cash is obtained, the cash available to invest will be invested in accordance with our investment policy. Our investment policy allows us to invest in taxable and tax-exempt bonds as well as publicly traded and private equity investments. With respect to bonds, our credit exposure limit for each issuer varies with the issuer’s credit quality. The allocation between taxable and tax-exempt bonds is determined based on market conditions and tax considerations, including the applicability of the alternative minimum tax.
We have access to various capital sources including dividends from insurance subsidiaries, invested assets in our Non-U.S. Subsidiaries, undrawn capacity under United National Insurance Company’s discretionary demand line of credit, and access to the debt and equity capital markets. We believe we have sufficient liquidity to meet our capital needs.
For further disclosure regarding Liquidity, see Item 7 in our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Capital Resources
We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on any of our common shares in the foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain any future earnings to fund the development and growth of our business.
On January 18, 2006, UAI Luxembourg Investment loaned $6.0 million to United America Indemnity, Ltd. The loan has been and will be used to pay operating expenses that arise in the normal course of business. The loan is a demand loan and bears interest at 4.38%. United America Indemnity, Ltd. is dependent on its subsidiaries to pay it dividends to pay its operating expenses. We anticipate that our Bermuda insurance operations will begin to pay dividends to United America Indemnity, Ltd. during 2007.
UAI Luxembourg Investment holds promissory notes of $175.0 million and $110.0 million from UAI Group, which have interest rates of 6.64% and 6.20%, respectively, and mature in 2018 and 2020, respectively. The $110.0 million note was issued on January 24, 2005. It is anticipated that interest on both notes will be paid yearly. UAI Group has no operations. The ability of UAI Group to generate cash to repay the notes is dependent on dividends that it receives from its subsidiaries.
Our business trust subsidiaries have issued floating rate capital and floating rate common securities. A summary of the terms related to these securities is as follows:
Issuer | Amount | Maturity | Interest Rate | Call Provisions | ||||
AIS through its wholly owned subsidiary UNG Trust 1 | $10.0 million issued September 30, 2003 | September 30, 2033 | Payable quarterly at the Three month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR) plus 4.05% | At par after September 30, 2008 | ||||
AIS through its wholly owned subsidiary UNG Trust 2 | $20.0 million issued October 29, 2003 | October 29, 2033 | Payable quarterly at the three month LIBOR plus 3.85% | At par after October 29, 2008 | ||||
PAGI through its wholly owned subsidiary Penn Trust II | $15.0 million issued May 15, 2003 | May 15, 2033 | Payable quarterly at the three month LIBOR plus 4.1% | At par after May 15, 2008 | ||||
PAGI through its wholly owned subsidiary Penn Trust I | $15.0 million issued December 4, 2002 | December 4, 2032 | Payable quarterly at the three month LIBOR plus 4.0% (1) | At par after December 4, 2009 |
(1) | To protect against increases in interest rates, we have a fixed rate interest rate swap on these securities that locks the interest at an annual rate of 7.4%. The swap agreement expires on December 4, 2007. |
The proceeds from the above offerings were used to purchase junior subordinated interest notes and were used to support the business growth in the insurance subsidiaries and general business needs.
Distributions on the above securities can be deferred up to five years, but in the event of such deferral, we may not declare or pay cash dividends on the common stock of the applicable subsidiary.
38
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
Our wholly owned business trust subsidiaries, UNG Trust I, UNG Trust II, Penn Trust I, and Penn Trust II, are not consolidated pursuant to FIN 46R. Our business trust subsidiaries have issued $60.0 million in floating rate capital securities and $1.9 million of floating rate common securities. The sole assets of the business trust subsidiaries are $61.9 million of our junior subordinated debentures, which have the same terms with respect to maturity, payments and distributions as the floating rate capital securities and the floating rate common securities.
United National Insurance Company has a $25.0 million discretionary demand line of credit. There were no outstanding borrowings against this line of credit as of June 30, 2006.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off balance sheet arrangements.
Inflation
Property and casualty insurance premiums are established before we know the amount of losses and loss adjustment expenses or the extent to which inflation may affect such amounts. We attempt to anticipate the potential impact of inflation in establishing our reserves.
Substantial future increases in inflation could result in future increases in interest rates, which in turn are likely to result in a decline in the market value of the investment portfolio and resulting unrealized losses or reductions in shareholders’ equity.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Some of the statements under “Business,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and elsewhere in this report may include forward-looking statements that reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance that are intended to be covered by the safe harbor for forward-looking statements provided by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts. These statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “believe,” “expect,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “project,” “plan,” “seek,” “intend,” or “anticipate” or the negative thereof or comparable terminology, and include discussions of strategy, financial projections and estimates and their underlying assumptions, statements regarding plans, objectives, expectations or consequences of identified transactions, and statements about the future performance, operations, products and services of the companies.
Our business and operations are and will be subject to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors. Consequently, actual results and experience may materially differ from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Such risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results and experience to differ from those projected include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) the ineffectiveness of our business strategy due to changes in current or future market conditions; (2) the effects of competitors’ pricing policies, and of changes in laws and regulations on competition, including industry consolidation and development of competing financial products; (3) greater frequency or severity of claims and loss activity than our underwriting, reserving or investment practices have anticipated; (4) decreased level of demand for our insurance products or increased competition due to an increase in capacity of property and casualty insurers; (5) risks inherent in establishing loss and loss adjustment expense reserves; (6) uncertainties relating to the financial ratings of our insurance subsidiaries; (7) uncertainties arising from the cyclical nature of our business; (8) changes in our relationships with, and the capacity of, our general agents; (9) the risk that our reinsurers may not be able to fulfill obligations; (10) investment performance and credit risk; and (11) uncertainties relating to governmental and regulatory policies.
The foregoing review of important factors should not be construed as exhaustive and should be read in conjunction with the other cautionary statements that are included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as well as in the materials filed and to be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). We undertake no obligation to publicly update or review any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.
39
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We believe that we are principally exposed to three types of market risk: interest rate risk, credit risk, and equity price risk, which are discussed separately below.
Interest Rate Risk
Our primary market risk exposure is to changes in interest rates. Our bonds are exposed to interest rate risk. Fluctuations in interest rates have a direct impact on the market valuation of these securities. As interest rates rise, the market value of our bonds fall, and the converse is also true. We expect to manage interest rate risk through an active portfolio management strategy that involves the selection, by our managers, of investments with appropriate characteristics, such as duration, yield, currency and liquidity, that are tailored to the anticipated cash outflow characteristics of our liabilities. Our strategy for managing interest rate risk also includes maintaining a high quality portfolio with a relatively short duration to reduce the effect of interest rate changes on book value. A significant portion of our investment portfolio matures each year, allowing for reinvestment at current market rates.
As of June 30, 2006, assuming identical shifts in interest rates for securities of all maturities, the table below illustrates the sensitivity of market value in United America Indemnity’s bonds to selected hypothetical changes in basis point increases and decreases:
Change in | ||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Market Value | |||||||||||
Basis Point Change | Market Value | $ | % | |||||||||
200 | $ | 1,146,205 | $ | (91,940 | ) | (7.4 | )% | |||||
100 | 1,191,996 | (46,149 | ) | (3.7 | ) | |||||||
No change | 1,238,145 | — | — | |||||||||
(100) | 1,283,490 | 45,345 | 3.7 | |||||||||
(200) | 1,326,549 | 88,404 | 7.1 |
Credit Risk
We have exposure to credit risk primarily as a holder of bonds. Our investment policy requires that we invest in debt instruments of high credit quality issuers and limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer based upon the rating of the security.
In addition, we have credit risk exposure to our general agencies and reinsurers. We seek to mitigate and control our risks to producers by typically requiring our general agencies to render payments within no more than 45 days after the month in which a policy is effective and including provisions within our general agency contracts that allow us to terminate a general agencies’ authority in the event of non-payment.
With respect to our credit exposure to reinsurers, we seek to mitigate and control our risk by ceding business to only those reinsurers that we believe to have adequate financial strength and sufficient capital to fund their obligation. In addition, we seek to mitigate credit risk to reinsurers through the use of trusts for collateral. As of June 30, 2006, $654.3 million of collateral was held in trust to support the reinsurance receivables.
Equity Price Risk
The objective for our equity portfolio is to outperform the market primarily through specific stock selection while constructing and managing the equity portfolio with the most efficient ratio of return to risk. Our equity strategy is based on the view that our core holding should be a conservative, broadly diversified portfolio comprised of domestic large capitalization common stocks, but that we can occasionally out-perform our benchmark portfolio by moderately overweighting specific industry sectors that our investment advisors believe are attractive relative to their fundamental values.
Seeking active returns, exclusively from stock selection means that we minimize all other portfolio risk for which
40
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
we believe an investor is not adequately compensated, which includes market timing and sector, capitalization, and style biases. As part of our strategy, stocks are sold when their risk/return profile is no longer attractive.
The carrying values of investments subject to equity prices are based on quoted market prices as of the balance sheet dates. Market prices are subject to fluctuation and thus the amount realized in the subsequent sale of and investment may differ from the reported market value. Fluctuation in the market price of a security results from perceived changes in the underlying economic makeup of a stock, the price of alternative investments and overall market conditions.
As of June 30, 2006, the table below summarizes our equity price risk and reflects the effect of a hypothetical 10%, and 20% increase or decrease in the market prices of our preferred and common equity securities. The selected hypothetical changes do not indicate what could be the potential best or worst scenarios.
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Hypothetical | ||||||||
Estimated Fair Value | Percentage Increase | |||||||
Hypothetical Price | after Hypothetical | (Decrease) in | ||||||
Change | Change in Prices | Shareholders' Equity | ||||||
(20%) | $ | 53,161 | (1.3 | %) | ||||
(10%) | 59,806 | (0.7 | %) | |||||
No change | 66,451 | — | ||||||
10% | 73,096 | 0.7 | % | |||||
20% | 79,741 | 1.3 | % |
Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Based on their evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), our Chief Financial Officer, who is acting in his capacity as such, and our President, the President and Chief Executive Officer of United America Insurance Group, and the President and Chief Executive Officer of Penn Independent Corporation, who are currently fulfilling the duties and responsibilities of our principal executive officer in the aggregate, have concluded that as of June 30, 2006, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in that they are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and information that we are required to disclose in our Exchange Act reports is accumulated and communicated to management as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Controls
There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2006 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
41
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
PART II-OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
We are, from time to time, involved in various legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business, including litigation regarding claims. We do not believe that the resolution of any currently pending legal proceedings, either individually or taken as a whole, will have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition. With respect to our reinsurance relationships, there is a greater potential for disputes with reinsurers who are in a runoff of their reinsurance operations. Some of our reinsurers are in a runoff of their reinsurance operations, and therefore, we closely monitor those relationships. We anticipate that, similar to the rest of the insurance and reinsurance industry, we will continue to be subject to litigation and arbitration proceedings in the ordinary course of business.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Our results of operations and financial condition are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties described in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk factors” in our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on March 16, 2006. These risk factors have not materially changed other than as set forth below.
We Are Dependent on Our Senior Executives and the Loss of Any of These Executives or Our Inability to Hire and Retain a Chief Executive Officer or Other Key Personnel Could Adversely Affect Our Business.
Our success substantially depends upon our ability to attract and retain qualified employees and upon the ability of our senior management and other key employees to implement our business strategy. We believe there are only a limited number of available qualified executives in the business lines in which we compete. We are currently conducting a search for a Chief Executive Officer who will be responsible for developing our business strategy, oversight of our operating subsidiaries and management of our holding company operations. These duties and responsibilities have been fulfilled in the aggregate by our senior management team, including Joseph F. Morris, our President, Kevin L. Tate, our Chief Financial Officer, William F. Schmidt, President and Chief Executive Officer of United America Insurance Group, and Robert Cohen, President and Chief Executive Officer of Penn Independent Corporation. Messrs. Morris, Schmidt and Cohen each report directly to our Board of Directors through its Chairman.
Mr. Morris has recently announced that he will resign effective August 25, 2006. Mr. Morris’ responsibilities include general corporate oversight, shareholder and SEC reporting, and investor relations for the Company. The departure of Mr. Morris will temporarily increase the responsibilities of our remaining senior executives to fulfill duties currently performed by Mr. Morris. As such, the success of our initiatives and our future performance depend upon our ability to attract and retain a Chief Executive Officer and upon the continued service of our senior management team.
Each of these senior executives has an employment agreement with us, although these agreements cannot assure us of the continued service of these individuals. Although we are not aware of any planned departures, other than Mr. Morris, the loss of any of the services of members of our senior management team or the inability to attract and retain other talented personnel could impede the further development and execution of our business strategy, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. We do not currently maintain key man life insurance policies with respect to any of our employees.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The following matters were submitted to a vote of shareholders at our Annual General Meeting of Shareholders on May 25, 2006:
1. | Election of the following nominees to our Board of Directors. |
Nominee | Votes For | Votes Against | Votes Abstained | |||||||||
Saul A. Fox | 140,031,774 | 83,905 | 2,042 | |||||||||
Edward J. Noonan | 140,030,265 | 83,740 | 3,716 | |||||||||
Troy W. Thacker | 140,029,016 | 85,988 | 2,716 | |||||||||
John J. Hendrickson | 140,109,636 | 6,292 | 1,792 | |||||||||
Kenneth J. Singleton | 140,110,689 | 5,153 | 1,878 | |||||||||
Stephen A. Cozen | 140,108,836 | 7,093 | 1,792 | |||||||||
Richard L. Duszak | 140,110,592 | 5,336 | 1,792 |
2. | Approval of an amendment to our Share Incentive Plan. |
Votes For | Votes Against | Votes Abstained | Broker Non Votes | |||
133,193,424 | 2,049,518 | 77,681 | 4,797,098 |
3. | Approval of an amendment to our Amended and Restated Annual Incentive Awards Program. |
Votes For | Votes Against | Votes Abstained | Broker Non Votes | |||
139,607,017 | 431,308 | 79,395 | 1 |
4. | Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent auditor for 2006 and the authorization of our Board of Directors acting by its Audit Committee to set the fees for the independent auditor. |
Votes For | Votes Against | Votes Abstained | Broker Non Votes | |||
140,016,349 | 99,517 | 1,855 | 0 |
42
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
5. | Election of the following nominees to the Wind River Insurance Company (Barbados) Ltd. Board of Directors. |
Nominee | Votes For | Votes Withheld | ||||||
Troy W. Thacker | 140,035,807 | 81,914 | ||||||
David N. King | 140,111,782 | 5,939 | ||||||
Nicholas Crichlow | 140,111,982 | 5,739 | ||||||
Joseph F. Morris | 140,035,807 | 81,914 | ||||||
Alan Bossin | 140,111,982 | 5,739 | ||||||
Michael J. Tait | 140,111,982 | 5,739 | ||||||
Kevin L. Tate | 140,035,433 | 82,288 | ||||||
David R. Whiting | 140,035,807 | 81,914 | ||||||
Janita Burke Waldron (Alternate Director) | 140,114,001 | 3,720 | ||||||
Kaela Keen (Alternate Director) | 140,114,001 | 3,720 |
6. | Approval of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers, St. Michael, Barbados, as the independent auditor of Wind River Insurance Company (Barbados) Ltd. for 2006 and of the setting of fees for the independent auditor by the Board of Directors of Wind River Insurance Company (Barbados) Ltd. |
Votes For | Votes Against | Votes Abstained | Broker Non Votes | |||
139,963,734 | 98,440 | 55,547 | 0 |
7. | Approval of the amendment to the organizational documents of Wind River Insurance Company (Barbados) Ltd., the change of jurisdiction of Wind River Insurance Company (Barbados) Ltd. to Bermuda, and the amalgamation of Wind River Insurance Company (Barbados) Ltd. with Wind River Insurance Company, Ltd. |
Votes For | Votes Against | Votes Abstained | Broker Non Votes | |||
135,292,377 | 26,720 | 1,524 | 4,797,100 |
8. | Approval of the financial statements of Wind River Insurance Company (Barbados) Ltd. and the report of the independent auditors on these financial statements. |
Votes For | Votes Against | Votes Abstained | ||
110,015,996 | 0 | 0 |
9. | Election of the following nominees to the Wind River Insurance Company, Ltd. Board of Directors. |
Nominee | Votes For | Votes Withheld | ||||||
Alan Bossin | 138,072,581 | 6,474 | ||||||
Michael J. Tait | 138,072,598 | 6,457 | ||||||
Troy W. Thacker | 137,996,036 | 83,019 | ||||||
Kevin L. Tate | 137,996,249 | 82,806 | ||||||
Joseph F. Morris | 137,996,423 | 82,632 | ||||||
David R. Whiting | 138,072,598 | 6,457 | ||||||
Janita Burke Waldron (Alternate Director) | 138,074,617 | 4,438 | ||||||
Kaela Keen (Alternate Director) | 138,074,617 | 4,438 |
10. | Approval of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers, Hamilton, Bermuda, as the independent auditor of Wind River Insurance Company, Ltd. for 2006. |
Votes For | Votes Against | Votes Abstained | Broker Non Votes | |||
137,924,900 | 98,440 | 55,715 | 2,038,666 |
11. | Approval of the financial statements of Wind River Insurance Company, Ltd. and the report of the independent auditors on these financial statements. |
Votes For | Votes Against | Votes Abstained | ||
110,015,996 | 0 | 0 |
43
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
12. | Election of the following nominees to the Wind River Services, Ltd. Board of Directors. |
Nominee | Votes For | Votes Withheld | ||||||
Troy W. Thacker | 137,996,423 | 82,632 | ||||||
Kevin L. Tate | 137,996,636 | 82,419 | ||||||
Alan Bossin | 138,072,985 | 6,070 | ||||||
Michael J. Tait | 138,072,985 | 6,070 | ||||||
Joseph F. Morris | 137,996,810 | 82,245 | ||||||
David R. Whiting | 137,996,810 | 82,245 | ||||||
Janita Burke Waldron (Alternate Director) | 138,075,004 | 4,051 | ||||||
Kaela Keen (Alternate Director) | 138,075,004 | 4,051 |
13. | Approval of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers, Hamilton, Bermuda, as the independent auditor of Wind River Services, Ltd. for 2006. |
Votes For | Votes Against | Votes Abstained | ||
135,442,045 | 79,740 | 55,328 |
12. | Approval of the proposal to waive the presentation of the financial statements of Wind River Services, Ltd. and the report of the independent auditors on these financial statements for approval by shareholders. |
Votes For | Votes Against | Votes Abstained | ||
135,475,211 | 99,567 | 2,334 |
Item 6. Exhibits
10.1* | Executive Employment Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2006, between Wind River Insurance Company (Bermuda), Ltd. and David R. Whiting (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 17, 2006). | |
10.2* | Amendment No. 3 to the United America Indemnity, Ltd. Share Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 1, 2006). | |
10.3* | Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated United America Indemnity, Ltd. Annual Incentive Awards Program (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 1, 2006). | |
10.4* | Amendment No. 1 to the Management Agreement, dated as of May 25, 2006, by and among United America Indemnity, Ltd., Fox Paine & Company, LLC and Wind River Holdings, L.P., formerly The AMC Group, L.P. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 1, 2006). | |
31.1+ | Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2+ | Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.3+ | Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.4+ | Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1+ | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.2+ | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
44
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
32.3+ | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.4+ | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
+ | Filed herewith. | |
* | Management contract |
45
Table of Contents
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD. | ||||
Registrant | ||||
August 9, 2006 | By: | /s/ Kevin L. Tate | ||
Date: August 9, 2006 | Kevin L. Tate | |||
Chief Financial Officer | ||||
(Authorized Signatory and | ||||
Principal Financial and Accounting | ||||
Officer) |
46