EXHIBIT 99.2
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2018
CONTENTS
Page | ||
Condensed Consolidated Interim Statements of Operations | ||
Condensed Consolidated Interim Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) | ||
Condensed Consolidated Interim Statements of Cash Flows | ||
Condensed Consolidated Interim Balance Sheets | ||
Condensed Consolidated Interim Statements of Changes in Equity | ||
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: | ||
1: | Nature of Operations | |
2: | Basis of Preparation and Presentation | |
3: | Recent Accounting Pronouncements | |
4: | Divestitures | |
5: | Revenue | |
6: | Other (Income) Expenses | |
7: | Finance Income and Expense | |
8: | Income Taxes | |
9: | Earnings (Loss) Per Share | |
10: | Supplementary Cash Flow Information | |
11: | Financial Instruments | |
12: | Inventories | |
13: | Selected Composition Notes | |
14: | Property, Plant and Equipment | |
15: | Investment in Associate | |
16: | Long-Term Debt | |
17: | Share Capital | |
18: | Share-Based Payments | |
19: | Non-Controlling Interests | |
20: | Capital Management | |
21: | Operating Segments | |
22: | Contingencies |
YAMANA GOLD INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the three months ended June 30, | For the six months ended June 30, | |||||||||||
(In millions of US Dollars except for shares and per share amounts) | 2018 | 2017 (restated) | 2018 | 2017 (restated) | ||||||||
Revenue (Note 5) | $ | 431.5 | $ | 428.1 | $ | 881.2 | $ | 831.6 | ||||
Cost of sales excluding depletion, depreciation and amortization | (234.1 | ) | (261.0 | ) | (493.3 | ) | (499.0 | ) | ||||
Gross margin excluding depletion, depreciation and amortization | $ | 197.4 | $ | 167.1 | $ | 387.9 | $ | 332.6 | ||||
Depletion, depreciation and amortization | (93.9 | ) | (111.9 | ) | (198.0 | ) | (217.8 | ) | ||||
Impairment of mining properties (Note 4) | — | — | (103.0 | ) | — | |||||||
Mine operating earnings | $ | 103.5 | $ | 55.2 | $ | 86.9 | $ | 114.8 | ||||
Expenses | ||||||||||||
General and administrative | (23.9 | ) | (25.9 | ) | (50.1 | ) | (51.2 | ) | ||||
Exploration and evaluation | (3.2 | ) | (5.3 | ) | (7.0 | ) | (9.4 | ) | ||||
Share of earnings of associate (Note 15) | 0.5 | — | 0.5 | — | ||||||||
Other income (expenses) (Note 6) | 10.0 | (15.2 | ) | 35.3 | (33.8 | ) | ||||||
Impairment of non-operating mining properties (Note 4) | — | — | (71.0 | ) | — | |||||||
Operating earnings (loss) | $ | 86.9 | $ | 8.8 | $ | (5.4 | ) | $ | 20.4 | |||
Finance income (Note 7) | $ | 4.9 | $ | 0.6 | $ | 12.8 | $ | 1.8 | ||||
Finance expense (Note 7) | (28.7 | ) | (31.5 | ) | (76.1 | ) | (62.6 | ) | ||||
Net finance expense | $ | (23.8 | ) | $ | (30.9 | ) | $ | (63.3 | ) | $ | (60.8 | ) |
Earnings (loss) before taxes | $ | 63.1 | $ | (22.1 | ) | $ | (68.7 | ) | $ | (40.4 | ) | |
Current income tax expense (Note 8) | $ | (31.2 | ) | $ | (19.8 | ) | $ | (57.7 | ) | $ | (30.2 | ) |
Deferred income tax (expense) recovery (Note 8) | (19.5 | ) | (0.9 | ) | (21.7 | ) | 28.7 | |||||
Income tax expense | $ | (50.7 | ) | $ | (20.7 | ) | $ | (79.4 | ) | $ | (1.5 | ) |
Net earnings (loss) | $ | 12.4 | $ | (42.8 | ) | $ | (148.1 | ) | $ | (41.9 | ) | |
Attributable to: | ||||||||||||
Yamana Gold Inc. equityholders | $ | 18.0 | $ | (39.9 | ) | $ | (142.0 | ) | $ | (40.0 | ) | |
Non-controlling interests | (5.6 | ) | (2.9 | ) | (6.1 | ) | (1.9 | ) | ||||
Net earnings (loss) | $ | 12.4 | $ | (42.8 | ) | $ | (148.1 | ) | $ | (41.9 | ) | |
Earnings (loss) per share attributable to Yamana Gold Inc. equityholders (Note 9) | ||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.02 | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | (0.15 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | |
Diluted | $ | 0.02 | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | (0.15 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | |
Weighted average number of shares outstanding (in thousands) (Note 9) | ||||||||||||
Basic | 948,952 | 948,116 | 948,832 | 948,009 | ||||||||
Diluted | 950,078 | 948,116 | 948,832 | 948,009 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements.
| 2
YAMANA GOLD INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
For the three months ended June 30, | For the six months ended June 30, | |||||||||||
(In millions of US Dollars) | 2018 | 2017 (restated) | 2018 | 2017 (restated) | ||||||||
Net earnings (loss) | $ | 12.4 | $ | (42.8 | ) | $ | (148.1 | ) | $ | (41.9 | ) | |
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of taxes | ||||||||||||
Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss: | ||||||||||||
Available-for-sale financial assets | ||||||||||||
- Fair value loss, net of income tax of nil | — | (0.1 | ) | — | (0.1 | ) | ||||||
- Reclassification adjustments | — | (0.6 | ) | — | 4.5 | |||||||
Cash flow hedging reserve | ||||||||||||
- Increase in fair value of hedging instruments | 2.6 | 8.4 | 10.7 | 36.1 | ||||||||
- Decrease in fair value of hedging instruments | (14.0 | ) | (27.5 | ) | (21.3 | ) | (33.0 | ) | ||||
- Reclassification of (gains)/losses recorded in earnings | 3.8 | — | 3.7 | — | ||||||||
- Tax Impact on fair value of hedging instruments | (0.7 | ) | 2.6 | (3.0 | ) | (2.1 | ) | |||||
Cost of hedging reserve | ||||||||||||
- Changes in fair value | (10.3 | ) | 6.0 | (8.2 | ) | (0.9 | ) | |||||
$ | (18.6 | ) | $ | (11.2 | ) | $ | (18.1 | ) | $ | 4.5 | ||
Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss: | ||||||||||||
Changes in the fair value of equity investments at FVOCI | (0.2 | ) | — | (0.4 | ) | — | ||||||
Total other comprehensive (loss) income | $ | (18.8 | ) | $ | (11.2 | ) | $ | (18.5 | ) | $ | 4.5 | |
Total comprehensive loss | $ | (6.4 | ) | $ | (54.0 | ) | $ | (166.6 | ) | $ | (37.4 | ) |
Attributable to: | ||||||||||||
Yamana Gold Inc. equityholders | $ | (0.8 | ) | $ | (48.8 | ) | $ | (159.8 | ) | $ | (35.0 | ) |
Non-controlling interests | (5.6 | ) | (5.2 | ) | (6.8 | ) | (2.4 | ) | ||||
Total comprehensive loss | $ | (6.4 | ) | $ | (54.0 | ) | $ | (166.6 | ) | $ | (37.4 | ) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements.
| 3
YAMANA GOLD INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the three months ended June 30, | For the six months ended June 30, | |||||||||||
(In millions of US Dollars) | 2018 | 2017 (restated) | 2018 | 2017 (restated) | ||||||||
Operating activities | ||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) before taxes | $ | 63.1 | $ | (22.1 | ) | $ | (68.7 | ) | $ | (40.4 | ) | |
Adjustments to reconcile loss before taxes to net operating cash flows: | ||||||||||||
Depletion, depreciation and amortization | 93.9 | 111.9 | 198.0 | 217.8 | ||||||||
Share-based payments (Note 18) | 3.7 | 2.5 | 4.5 | 5.7 | ||||||||
Finance income (Note 7) | (4.9 | ) | (0.6 | ) | (12.8 | ) | (1.8 | ) | ||||
Finance expense (Note 7) | 28.7 | 31.5 | 76.1 | 62.6 | ||||||||
Mark-to-market on sales of concentrate and price adjustments on unsettled invoices | (0.1 | ) | 1.4 | 8.6 | (0.7 | ) | ||||||
Mark-to-market on fair value through profit or loss instruments | 5.0 | (1.0 | ) | 6.1 | 2.7 | |||||||
Share of earnings of associate (Note 15) | (0.5 | ) | — | (0.5 | ) | — | ||||||
Impairment of mineral properties (Note 4(a)) | — | — | 174.0 | — | ||||||||
Amortization of deferred revenue | (11.7 | ) | (2.7 | ) | (15.5 | ) | (6.2 | ) | ||||
Gain on divestitures (Note 4(a,c)) | (32.0 | ) | — | (71.0 | ) | — | ||||||
Other non-cash expenses (Note 10(d)) | 14.4 | 11.5 | 24.6 | 14.4 | ||||||||
Decommissioning, restoration and similar liabilities paid | (1.5 | ) | (1.5 | ) | (2.5 | ) | (2.1 | ) | ||||
Advanced payments received on metal sales | — | (4.4 | ) | 127.8 | — | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities before income taxes paid and net change in working capital | 158.1 | 126.5 | 448.7 | 252.0 | ||||||||
Income taxes paid | (0.6 | ) | (3.7 | ) | (16.7 | ) | (12.1 | ) | ||||
Payments made related to the Brazilian tax matters | — | — | (67.9 | ) | — | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities before net change in working capital | $ | 157.5 | $ | 122.8 | $ | 364.1 | $ | 239.9 | ||||
Net change in working capital (Note 10(b)) | (55.1 | ) | 1.8 | (138.9 | ) | (64.1 | ) | |||||
Cash flows from operating activities | $ | 102.4 | $ | 124.6 | $ | 225.2 | $ | 175.8 | ||||
Investing activities | ||||||||||||
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment | $ | (104.0 | ) | $ | (139.0 | ) | $ | (236.0 | ) | $ | (268.4 | ) |
Proceeds on disposition of Canadian Exploration Properties (Note 4(c)) | — | — | 162.5 | — | ||||||||
Proceeds on disposition of investments and other assets | — | (1.2 | ) | 4.3 | 17.2 | |||||||
Cash outflow on disposition of Brio Gold (Note 4(a)) | (5.4 | ) | — | (5.4 | ) | — | ||||||
Acquisition of investments and other assets | (0.8 | ) | — | (3.2 | ) | — | ||||||
Cash (used in)/from other investing activities | (25.0 | ) | 1.1 | (42.8 | ) | (16.6 | ) | |||||
Cash flows used in investing activities | $ | (135.2 | ) | $ | (139.1 | ) | $ | (120.6 | ) | $ | (267.8 | ) |
Financing activities | ||||||||||||
Dividends paid (Note 17(b)) | $ | (4.7 | ) | $ | (4.7 | ) | $ | (9.5 | ) | $ | (9.6 | ) |
Interest and other finance expenses paid | (22.4 | ) | (31.4 | ) | (36.6 | ) | (50.3 | ) | ||||
Financing costs paid on early note redemption (Note 7) | — | — | (14.7 | ) | — | |||||||
Proceeds from Brio Gold Inc. private placement and rights offering | — | 56.7 | — | 71.5 | ||||||||
Repayment of term loan and notes payable (Note 16) | (61.5 | ) | (65.4 | ) | (441.9 | ) | (91.3 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from term loan and notes payable (Note 16) | 85.0 | 90.0 | 355.0 | 210.0 | ||||||||
Proceeds from other financing activities | 0.5 | — | 1.8 | — | ||||||||
Cash flows (used in)/from financing activities | $ | (3.1 | ) | $ | 45.2 | $ | (145.9 | ) | $ | 130.3 | ||
Effect of foreign exchange of non-US Dollar denominated cash and cash equivalents | 1.3 | (4.3 | ) | 1.5 | (3.4 | ) | ||||||
(Decrease)/Increase in cash and cash equivalents | $ | (34.6 | ) | $ | 26.4 | $ | (39.8 | ) | $ | 34.9 | ||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | $ | 129.3 | $ | 105.9 | $ | 148.9 | $ | 97.4 | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents classified as held for sale, beginning of period (Note 4) | $ | 20.7 | $ | — | $ | 6.3 | $ | — | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 115.4 | $ | 132.3 | $ | 115.4 | $ | 132.3 | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents reclassified as held for sale (Note 4) | $ | (1.0 | ) | $ | — | $ | (1.0 | ) | $ | — | ||
Cash and cash equivalents, excluding amounts classified as held for sale, end of period | $ | 114.4 | $ | 132.3 | $ | 114.4 | $ | 132.3 |
Supplementary cash flow information (Note 10).
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements.
| 4
YAMANA GOLD INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM BALANCE SHEETS
AS AT,
(In millions of US Dollars) | June 30, 2018 | December 31, 2017 (restated) | ||||
Assets | ||||||
Current assets: | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents (Note 10(c)) | $ | 114.4 | $ | 148.9 | ||
Trade and other receivables | 28.2 | 38.6 | ||||
Inventories (Note 12) | 151.9 | 163.5 | ||||
Other financial assets (Note 13(a)) | 8.8 | 13.2 | ||||
Other assets (Note 13(b)) | 107.1 | 119.4 | ||||
Assets held for sale (Note 4) | 228.3 | 355.8 | ||||
$ | 638.7 | $ | 839.4 | |||
Non-current assets: | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment (Note 14) | 6,677.0 | 7,153.2 | ||||
Goodwill and intangibles | 447.2 | 449.5 | ||||
Investment in associate (Note 15) | 141.0 | — | ||||
Deferred tax assets | 89.4 | 97.8 | ||||
Other financial assets (Note 13(a)) | 23.1 | 26.1 | ||||
Other assets (Note 13(b)) | 213.3 | 197.3 | ||||
Total assets | $ | 8,229.7 | $ | 8,763.3 | ||
Liabilities | ||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||
Trade and other payables | $ | 245.5 | $ | 345.4 | ||
Income taxes payable | 46.7 | 91.8 | ||||
Other financial liabilities (Note 13(c)) | 78.0 | 203.1 | ||||
Other provisions and liabilities (Note 13(d)) | 174.6 | 56.7 | ||||
Liabilities relating to assets held for sale (Note 4) | 66.6 | 83.7 | ||||
$ | 611.4 | $ | 780.7 | |||
Non-current liabilities: | ||||||
Long-term debt (Note 16) | 1,697.2 | 1,747.7 | ||||
Decommissioning, restoration and similar liabilities | 210.9 | 258.2 | ||||
Deferred tax liabilities | 1,157.5 | 1,147.1 | ||||
Other financial liabilities (Note 13(c)) | 85.1 | 85.7 | ||||
Other provisions and liabilities (Note 13(d)) | 302.3 | 296.6 | ||||
Total liabilities | $ | 4,064.4 | $ | 4,316.0 | ||
Equity | ||||||
Share capital (Note 17) | ||||||
Issued and outstanding 949,012,517 common shares (December 31, 2017 - 948,524,667 shares) | $ | 7,635.3 | $ | 7,633.7 | ||
Reserves | (5.9 | ) | 19.7 | |||
Deficit | (3,498.8 | ) | (3,340.0 | ) | ||
Attributable to Yamana Gold Inc. equityholders | $ | 4,130.6 | $ | 4,313.4 | ||
Non-controlling interests (Note 19) | 34.7 | 133.9 | ||||
Total equity | $ | 4,165.3 | $ | 4,447.3 | ||
Total liabilities and equity | $ | 8,229.7 | $ | 8,763.3 |
Contingencies (Note 22).
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements.
Approved by the Board
“Peter Marrone” | “Richard Graff” |
PETER MARRONE | RICHARD GRAFF |
Director | Director |
| 5
YAMANA GOLD INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
Share capital | Equity reserve | Hedging reserve | Cost of hedging reserve | Available -for-sale reserve | Fair value through OCI reserve | Other reserve | Total reserves | Deficit | Total equity attributable to Yamana shareholders | Non- controlling interest | Total equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as at January 1, 2017 as previously reported | $ | 7,630.5 | $ | 17.8 | $ | 0.2 | $ | — | $ | (3.5 | ) | $ | — | $ | (2.5 | ) | $ | 12.0 | $ | (3,130.3 | ) | $ | 4,512.2 | $ | 67.8 | $ | 4,580.0 | |||||||||
Adjustment from adoption of IFRS 9 (Note 3 (a)(ii)) | — | — | — | 2.3 | — | — | — | 2.3 | (2.3 | ) | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Restated balance as at January 1, 2017 | 7,630.5 | 17.8 | 0.2 | 2.3 | (3.5 | ) | — | (2.5 | ) | 14.3 | (3,132.6 | ) | 4,512.2 | 67.8 | 4,580.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive loss | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | (40.0 | ) | (1.9 | ) | (41.9 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income, net of income tax | ��� | — | 1.5 | (0.9 | ) | 4.4 | — | — | 5.0 | — | 5.0 | (0.5 | ) | 4.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
— | — | 1.5 | (0.9 | ) | 4.4 | — | — | 5.0 | — | (35.0 | ) | (2.4 | ) | (37.4 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Transactions with owners | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Divestment of Brio Gold shares | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 71.5 | 71.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issued on vesting of restricted share units (Note 18) | 2.0 | (2.0 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | (2.0 | ) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted share units (Note 18) | — | 1.7 | — | — | — | — | — | 1.7 | — | 1.7 | 3.8 | 5.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividend reinvestment plan | 0.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.1 | — | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends (Note 17(b)) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | (9.6 | ) | (9.6 | ) | — | (9.6 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Restated balance as at June 30, 2017 | $ | 7,632.6 | $ | 17.5 | $ | 1.7 | $ | 1.4 | $ | 0.9 | $ | — | $ | (2.5 | ) | $ | 19.0 | $ | (3,142.2 | ) | $ | 4,469.4 | $ | 140.7 | $ | 4,610.1 | ||||||||||
Restated balance as at December 31, 2017 | $ | 7,633.7 | $ | 18.0 | $ | 6.0 | $ | (4.1 | ) | $ | 1.0 | $ | — | $ | (1.2 | ) | $ | 19.7 | $ | (3,340.0 | ) | $ | 4,313.4 | $ | 133.9 | $ | 4,447.3 | |||||||||
Adjustments on initial application of: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IFRS 15 (Note 3(a)(i)) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | (16.4 | ) | (16.4 | ) | — | (16.4 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
IFRS 9 (Note 3(a)(ii)) | — | — | — | — | (1.0 | ) | (7.8 | ) | — | (8.8 | ) | 8.8 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted balance as at January 1, 2018 | $ | 7,633.7 | $ | 18.0 | $ | 6.0 | $ | (4.1 | ) | $ | — | $ | (7.8 | ) | $ | (1.2 | ) | $ | 10.9 | $ | (3,347.6 | ) | $ | 4,297.0 | $ | 133.9 | $ | 4,430.9 | ||||||||
Total comprehensive loss | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (142.0 | ) | $ | (142.0 | ) | $ | (6.1 | ) | $ | (148.1 | ) | ||||||||
Other comprehensive loss, net of income tax | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (9.2 | ) | $ | (8.2 | ) | $ | — | $ | (0.4 | ) | $ | — | $ | (17.8 | ) | $ | — | $ | (17.8 | ) | $ | (0.7 | ) | $ | (18.5 | ) | |||||
— | — | (9.2 | ) | (8.2 | ) | — | (0.4 | ) | — | (17.8 | ) | (142.0 | ) | (159.8 | ) | (6.8 | ) | (166.6 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Transactions with owners | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Impairment | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | (150.0 | ) | (150.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Disposal of part interest in subsidiary (Note 19 (iii)) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 16.0 | 16.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Disposal of Brio Gold (Note 4(a)) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 41.3 | 41.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issued on vesting of restricted share units (Note 18) | 1.4 | (1.4 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | (1.4 | ) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Vesting restricted share units (Note 18) | — | 2.4 | — | — | — | — | — | 2.4 | — | 2.4 | 0.3 | 2.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividend reinvestment plan (Note 17(a)) | 0.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.2 | — | 0.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends (Note 17(b)) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | (9.6 | ) | (9.6 | ) | — | (9.6 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as at June 30, 2018 | $ | 7,635.3 | $ | 19.0 | $ | (3.2 | ) | $ | (12.3 | ) | $ | — | $ | (8.2 | ) | $ | (1.2 | ) | $ | (5.9 | ) | $ | (3,498.8 | ) | $ | 4,130.6 | $ | 34.7 | $ | 4,165.3 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements.
| 6
YAMANA GOLD INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
(With Comparatives as at December 31, 2017 and for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2017)
(Tabular amounts in millions of US Dollars, unless otherwise noted)
1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Yamana Gold Inc. (the “Company” or “Yamana”) is a Canadian-based gold producer with significant gold production, gold development stage properties, exploration properties, and land positions throughout the Americas including Canada, Brazil, Chile and Argentina. Yamana plans to continue to build on this base through existing operating mine expansions and optimization initiatives, development of new mines, the advancement of its exploration properties and, at times, by targeting other gold consolidation opportunities with a primary focus in the Americas.
The address of the Company’s registered office is 200 Bay Street, Suite 2200, Royal Bank Plaza North Tower Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5J 2J3. The Company is listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (Symbol: YRI) and The New York Stock Exchange (Symbol: AUY).
These Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements are comprised of the Company, its subsidiaries, and its 50% interest in the Canadian Malartic mine, which is accounted for as a joint operation.
On May 24, 2018, the Company completed the disposal of its 53.6% controlling interest in Brio Gold to Leagold Mining Corporation ("Leagold"). Pursuant to the terms of the sale, the Company received 20.5% of Leagold's issued and outstanding shares which is accounted for as an investment in associate using the equity method. Refer to Note 4: Divestitures.
On June 26, 2018, the Company announced that the Cerro Moro mine in Argentina had achieved commercial production.
2. BASIS OF PREPARATION AND PRESENTATION
These Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting ("IAS 34") as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”). Accordingly, certain disclosures included in the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRSs”) as issued by the IASB have been condensed or omitted. These Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s last annual consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017, which include information necessary or useful to understanding the Company’s business and financial statement presentation. In particular, the Company’s significant accounting policies were presented in Note 3: Significant Accounting Policies to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017.
The accounting policies applied in the preparation of these Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements are consistent with those applied and disclosed in the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017, with the exception of the application of certain new and amended IFRSs issued by the IASB, which were effective from January 1, 2018, and the addition of an accounting policy related to investments in associates. Those new and amended IFRSs that had a significant impact on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements are described in Note 3: Recent Accounting Pronouncements. The accounting policy related to the Company's investment in associates is described in Note 15: Investment in Associate.
In preparing these Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements, management has made judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenue and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates. The critical judgements made by management in applying the Company’s accounting policies and the key sources of estimation uncertainty were the same as those applied and disclosed in Note 4: Critical Judgements and Estimation Uncertainties to the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017, except for those related to revenue recognition, which are disclosed in Note 5: Revenue and the determination of the commencement of commercial production at the Cerro Moro mine, which is disclosed below.
| 7
Commencement of Commercial Production
Prior to a mine being capable of operating at levels intended by management, costs incurred are capitalized as part of the costs of the related mining properties and proceeds from mineral sales are offset against costs capitalized. Depletion of capitalized costs for mining properties begins when the mine is capable of operating at levels intended by management. Management considers several factors in determining when a mining property is capable of operating at levels intended by management. Amongst other quantitative and qualitative factors, throughput, mill grades and recoveries were assessed over a reasonable period to make this determination. A factor of 70% of planned output and/or design capacity measures were utilized in determining the appropriate timing. The Company determined that the Cerro Moro mine was capable of operating at levels intended by management effective June 26, 2018.
3. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
(a) | Application of New and Revised IFRSs |
The Company has adopted the following new IFRSs that had an impact on these Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements:
i. | IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers ("IFRS 15") |
On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted IFRS 15. IFRS 15 is based on the principle that revenue is recognized when control of a good or service is transferred to a customer. The Company adopted IFRS 15 using the cumulative effect method applied to those contracts that were not completed as of January 1, 2018. The cumulative effect of initially applying IFRS 15 has been recognized as an adjustment to the opening deficit at January 1, 2018. Results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2018 are presented under IFRS 15, while prior period amounts have not been restated and continue to be reported under the accounting standards in effect for those periods.
The adoption of IFRS 15 did not have a significant impact on the Company's condensed consolidated interim financial statements, with the exception of adjustments to the metal streaming arrangements as discussed below, and the addition of new disclosures, which are included in Note 5: Revenue.
Under IFRS 15, where consideration is received in advance of the Company's performance of its obligation, there is an inherent financing component in the transaction. When the period between receipt of consideration and revenue recognition is greater than one year, the Company is required to determine whether the financing component is significant to the contract. The Company performed this assessment for its metal streaming arrangements with Sandstorm Gold Ltd ("Sandstorm") and Altius Minerals Corporation ("Altius") that existed at the date of initial application of IFRS 15, and determined that the financing component was significant to each of these arrangements.
Accordingly, in accounting for each of the arrangements under IFRS 15, the transaction price is increased by an imputed interest amount and a corresponding amount of interest expense recognized in each period. The Company recorded a net increase of $16.4 million to the opening deficit balance as of January 1, 2018 due to the cumulative impact of adopting IFRS 15, as a result of adjustments to the deferred revenue balances associated with the Company's metal streaming arrangements. The adjustments resulted from a change in draw down rates resulting from the adjustment to the transaction price to reflect the financing component.
| 8
The impact of adoption of IFRS 15 on the Company’s condensed consolidated interim statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and condensed consolidated interim balance sheet as at June 30, 2018 was as follows:
Condensed consolidated interim statements of operations (extract)
Three months ended June 30, 2018 | Six months ended June 30, 2018 | |||||||||||||||||
As reported | Balances without adoption of IFRS 15 | Effect of change | As reported | Balances without adoption of IFRS 15 | Effect of change | |||||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 431.5 | $ | 429.0 | $ | 2.5 | $ | 881.2 | $ | 875.6 | $ | 5.6 | ||||||
Gross margin excluding DDA | $ | 197.4 | $ | 194.9 | $ | 2.5 | $ | 387.9 | $ | 382.3 | $ | 5.6 | ||||||
Mine operating earnings | $ | 103.5 | $ | 101.0 | $ | 2.5 | $ | 86.9 | $ | 81.3 | $ | 5.6 | ||||||
Finance expense | (28.7 | ) | (24.2 | ) | (4.5 | ) | (76.1 | ) | (66.5 | ) | (9.6 | ) | ||||||
Net finance expense | $ | (23.8 | ) | $ | (19.3 | ) | $ | (4.5 | ) | $ | (63.3 | ) | $ | (53.7 | ) | $ | (9.6 | ) |
Net earnings (loss) | $ | 12.4 | $ | 14.4 | $ | (2.0 | ) | $ | (148.1 | ) | $ | (144.1 | ) | $ | (4.0 | ) |
Condensed Consolidated Interim Balance Sheet (extract)
As at June 30, 2018 | As reported | Balances without adoption of IFRS 15 | Effect of change | ||||||
Liabilities | |||||||||
Current liabilities: | |||||||||
Other provisions and liabilities | $ | 174.6 | $ | 170.6 | $ | 4.0 | |||
Non-current liabilities: | |||||||||
Other provisions and liabilities | $ | 302.3 | $ | 285.9 | $ | 16.4 | |||
Total liabilities | $ | 4,064.4 | $ | 4,044.0 | $ | 20.4 | |||
Equity | |||||||||
Deficit | $ | (3,498.8 | ) | $ | (3,478.4 | ) | $ | (20.4 | ) |
Total equity | $ | 4,165.3 | $ | 4,185.7 | $ | (20.4 | ) | ||
Total liabilities and equity | $ | 8,229.7 | $ | 8,229.7 | $ | — |
The above changes are attributable to accounting for the financing component in the Company's streaming arrangements, as discussed above, and the financing component on the advanced copper purchase agreement entered into in January 2018. Refer to Note 13(d): Other Provisions and Liabilities.
ii. | IFRS 9 Financial Instruments ("IFRS 9") |
On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted IFRS 9 (2014). IFRS 9 addresses the classification, measurement and derecognition of financial assets and financial liabilities, introduces new rules for hedge accounting and a new impairment model for financial assets. In accordance with the transitional provisions in IFRS 9, comparative figures have not been restated with the exception of certain aspects of hedge accounting.
The following summarizes the significant changes in IFRS 9 compared to the current standard:
a. | Classification and Measurement of Financial Assets |
IFRS 9 contains three principal classification categories for financial assets: measured at amortized cost, fair value through other comprehensive income (“FVOCI”) and fair value through profit or loss (“FVTPL”). The classification of financial assets under IFRS 9 is generally based on the business model in which a financial asset is managed and its contractual cash flow characteristics. Management reviewed and assessed the Company’s existing financial assets as at January 1, 2018 based on the facts and circumstances that existed at that date and concluded that the initial application of IFRS 9 has had the following impact on the Company’s financial assets as regards their classification and measurement:
| 9
• | Financial assets measured at FVTPL under IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement ("IAS 39") continue to be measured as such under IFRS 9; |
• | Financial assets classified as Loans and Receivables under IAS 39 that were measured at amortized cost continue to be measured at amortized cost under IFRS 9; |
• | Investments in equity securities that were classified as available-for-sale under IAS 39 have been classified at FVOCI, pursuant to the irrevocable election available in IFRS 9. Under IFRS 9, all realized and unrealized gains and losses are recognized permanently in OCI with no reclassification to profit or loss. Accordingly, impairment losses of $8.8 million on equity securities that the Company continued to own at January 1, 2018 that were previously recognized in profit or loss were reclassified from opening deficit to the fair value through OCI reserve on January 1, 2018. |
b. | Impairment of Financial Assets |
IFRS 9 introduced a single expected credit loss impairment model, which is based on changes in credit quality since initial recognition. The adoption of the expected credit loss impairment model did not have a significant impact on the carrying amounts of the Company's financial assets on the transition date given the Company transacts exclusively with large international financial institutions and other organizations with strong credit ratings and the negligible historical level of customer default.
c. | Hedge Accounting |
IFRS 9 changes the requirements for hedge effectiveness and consequently for the application of hedge accounting. The IAS 39 effectiveness test is replaced with a requirement for an economic relationship between the hedged item and hedging instrument, and for the ‘hedged ratio’ to be the same as that used by the entity for risk management purposes. Certain restrictions that prevented some hedging strategies and hedging instruments from qualifying for hedge accounting were removed under IFRS 9. Generally, the mechanics of hedge accounting remain unchanged.
All of the Company’s existing hedging relationships that qualified for hedge accounting under IAS 39 were assessed upon adoption of IFRS 9 and these have continued to qualify for hedge accounting under IFRS 9. The Company also reassessed economic hedges that did not qualify for hedge accounting under IAS 39. IFRS 9 has enabled the Company to apply hedge accounting to copper derivative contracts, thus reducing the volatility of reported net income. These positions previously did not qualify for hedge accounting as component hedging was not permitted under IAS 39.
The Company enters into zero-cost collars, which consist of a combination of purchased and written (sold) options to reduce the impact of the variability of the US Dollar amount of foreign currency denominated operating expenditures caused by changes in currency exchange rates. Under IAS 39, the Company separated the intrinsic value and time value of these contracts, designating only the change in intrinsic value as the hedging instrument. As a result, any variability in the intrinsic value was taken to OCI and any variability in the time value was taken to profit or loss. Under IFRS 9, the Company will continue to separate the intrinsic value and time value of these contracts, designating only the change in intrinsic value as the hedging instrument as allowed under the exception provided in IFRS 9. However, under IFRS 9, changes in time value are recognized in OCI as a cost of hedging rather than in profit or loss, resulting in a reduction in profit or loss volatility.
| 10
Effect of Adjustments Arising from Application of IFRS 9 Hedge Accounting Requirements
Retrospective application of the cost of hedging approach has had the following effects on the amounts presented for 2017:
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (extract)
Three months ended June 30, 2017 | Six months ended June 30, 2017 | |||||||||||||||||
As originally presented | IFRS 9 Adjustments | Restated | As originally presented | IFRS 9 Adjustments | Restated | |||||||||||||
Expenses | ||||||||||||||||||
Finance income | 5.9 | (5.3 | ) | 0.6 | 1.8 | — | 1.8 | |||||||||||
Finance expense | (30.8 | ) | (0.7 | ) | (31.5 | ) | (63.5 | ) | 0.9 | (62.6 | ) | |||||||
Net finance expense | $ | (24.9 | ) | $ | (6.0 | ) | $ | (30.9 | ) | $ | (61.7 | ) | $ | 0.9 | $ | (60.8 | ) | |
Earnings (loss) before tax | (16.1 | ) | (6.0 | ) | (22.1 | ) | (41.3 | ) | 0.9 | (40.4 | ) | |||||||
Net earnings (loss) | $ | (36.8 | ) | $ | (6.0 | ) | $ | (42.8 | ) | $ | (42.8 | ) | $ | 0.9 | $ | (41.9 | ) | |
Attributable to: | ||||||||||||||||||
Yamana Gold Inc. equityholders | (34.7 | ) | (5.2 | ) | (39.9 | ) | (40.9 | ) | 0.9 | (40.0 | ) | |||||||
Non-controlling interests | (2.1 | ) | (0.8 | ) | (2.9 | ) | (1.9 | ) | — | (1.9 | ) | |||||||
Net earnings (loss) | $ | (36.8 | ) | $ | (6.0 | ) | $ | (42.8 | ) | $ | (42.8 | ) | $ | 0.9 | $ | (41.9 | ) | |
Loss per share attributable to Yamana Gold Inc. equityholders | ||||||||||||||||||
Loss per share - basic and diluted | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | — | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | 0.01 | $ | (0.04 | ) |
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (extract)
Three months ended June 30, 2017 | Six months ended June 30, 2017 | |||||||||||||||||
As originally presented | IFRS 9 Adjustments | Restated | As originally presented | IFRS 9 Adjustments | Restated | |||||||||||||
Net loss | $ | (36.8 | ) | $ | (6.0 | ) | $ | (42.8 | ) | $ | (42.8 | ) | $ | 0.9 | $ | (41.9 | ) | |
Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss | ||||||||||||||||||
Cost of hedging reserve - changes in fair value | — | 6.0 | 6.0 | — | (0.9 | ) | (0.9 | ) | ||||||||||
Total other comprehensive (loss)/income | $ | (17.2 | ) | $ | 6.0 | $ | (11.2 | ) | $ | 5.4 | $ | (0.9 | ) | $ | 4.5 | |||
Total comprehensive loss | $ | (54.0 | ) | $ | — | $ | (54.0 | ) | $ | (37.4 | ) | $ | — | $ | (37.4 | ) |
The application of the cost of hedging approach resulted in the Company recognizing $10.3 million and $8.2 million of changes in the time value on the Company's zero-cost collar option contracts in OCI rather than in profit or loss as a finance expense in the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively.
Refer to Note 5: Revenue and Note 11: Financial Instruments for a description of the new accounting policies applied by the Company as a result of adoption of these new IFRS standards.
iii. | Adoption of Other Narrow Scope Amendments to IFRSs and IFRS Interpretations |
The Company also adopted other amendments to IFRSs, as well as the Interpretation IFRIC 22 Foreign Currency Transactions and Advance Consideration, which were effective for accounting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018. The impact of adoption was not significant to the Company's Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements.
(b) | New and Revised IFRSs not yet Effective |
Certain pronouncements have been issued by the IASB that are mandatory for accounting periods after December 31, 2018. Pronouncements that are not applicable to the Company have been excluded from this note.
| 11
IFRS 16 Leases ("IFRS 16")
In January 2016, the IASB issued IFRS 16, which supersedes IAS 17 Leases (and related interpretations). IFRS 16 introduces a comprehensive model for the identification of lease arrangements and accounting treatments. IFRS 16 distinguishes leases and service contracts on the basis of whether an identified asset is controlled by a customer. Distinctions of operating leases (off balance sheet) and finance leases (on balance sheet) are removed for lessee accounting, and are replaced by a model where a right-of-use asset and a corresponding liability are required to be recognized for all leases, with limited exceptions for short-term leases and leases of low value assets.
The adoption of IFRS 16 will result in the recognition of right-of-use assets and associated lease liabilities on the balance sheet, a decrease in lease expense and a corresponding increase in both depreciation expense on right-of-use assets and finance charges representing the unwind of the discount on the lease liability. The Company also expects cash flows from operating activities to increase under IFRS 16 as lease payments for substantially all leases will be recorded as financing outflows in the consolidated statement of cash flows as opposed to operating cash flows.
The Company has identified and collected data relating to existing agreements that will extend beyond January 1, 2019 that may contain right-of-use assets. These included service contracts that may contain embedded leases for property, plant and equipment. Current activities are focused around quantifying the accounting impact on adoption, including discount rate determination; developing internal processes and reviewing system requirements. The Company expects to report more detailed information, including estimated quantitative financial impacts, if material, in its consolidated financial statements as the effective date approaches.
IFRS 16 is effective for the Company from January 1, 2019. The Standard must be implemented retrospectively, either with the restatement of comparatives or with the cumulative impact of application recognized as at January 1, 2019 under the modified retrospective approach. The Company expects to use the modified retrospective approach.
4. DIVESTITURES
(a) | Brio Gold |
On May 24, 2018, the Company completed the sale of its 53.6% controlling interest in Brio Gold to Leagold Mining Corporation ("Leagold") and received total consideration of $147.6 million. The consideration was comprised of $140.5 million of Leagold common shares ("Leagold Shares"), representing approximately 20.5% of Leagold's issued and outstanding common shares at the closing date and $7.1 million of Leagold share purchase warrants, which entitle the Company to purchase one Leagold Share at a price of C$3.70 for a period of two years from May 24, 2018. The Leagold Shares were measured based on the 3-day volume weighted average trading price of Leagold Shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange ("TSX") as at May 23, 2018, and must be held for a minimum period of 12 months, subject to certain exceptions. The Leagold share purchase warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
During the first quarter of 2018, the Company concluded that the assets and liabilities of Brio Gold met the criteria for classification as held for sale, and accordingly, the assets and liabilities of Brio Gold were presented separately in the Company's condensed consolidated interim balance sheet as at March 31, 2018 as current assets and current liabilities, respectively.
Immediately prior to the classification as assets and liabilities held for sale, the carrying amount of Brio Gold was remeasured to its recoverable amount, being its fair value less costs of disposal ("FVLCD"). The FVLCD was determined using the Leagold share price per the TSX (C$2.86 per Leagold share), a level 1 input per the fair value hierarchy, and resulted in the Company recording an impairment loss of $145.0 million. The $145.0 million was the net of a $270.4 million gross asset impairment, of which $125.4 million was related to the non-controlling interests of Brio Gold. An additional impairment loss of $23.2 million was recorded, based on remeasuring Brio Gold to its recoverable amount using the closing share price of Leagold per the TSX (C$2.61 per Leagold share) as at March 31, 2018. The $23.2 million was the net of a $47.8 million gross asset impairment, of which $24.6 million was related to the non-controlling interests of Brio Gold. The net after-tax impairment loss recognized in the statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2018 relating to the above asset impairments totalled $168.2 million, which was net of a $5.8 million deferred income tax recovery.
| 12
Upon disposal of Brio Gold on May 24, 2018, the Company recognized a $32.0 million gain, as calculated below:
Total consideration (net of transaction costs of $1.5 million) | $ | 146.1 | |
Net assets sold and derecognized: | |||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 5.4 | |
Trade and other receivables | 1.4 | ||
Inventories | 42.0 | ||
Other financial assets | 1.5 | ||
Other assets | 16.1 | ||
Property, plant and equipment | 194.7 | ||
Deferred tax assets | 6.9 | ||
Total assets | $ | 268.0 | |
Trade and other payables | 54.1 | ||
Income taxes payable | 3.3 | ||
Other financial liabilities | 19.4 | ||
Other provisions and liabilities | 14.5 | ||
Long-term debt | 73.0 | ||
Deferred tax liabilities | 1.6 | ||
Decommissioning, restoration and similar liabilities | 34.2 | ||
Total liabilities | $ | 200.1 | |
Net assets | $ | 67.9 | |
Other comprehensive Income | 4.9 | ||
Non-controlling interests | 41.3 | ||
Net assets attributable to Yamana | $ | 114.1 | |
Gain on disposal | $ | 32.0 |
The gain on disposal is included in other income/(expenses) in the statement of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018.
Brio Gold was presented in the "Other Mines" reportable operating segment.
(b) | Gualcamayo and Related Argentinian Exploration Properties |
As part of ongoing strategic and technical reviews of its asset portfolio, in December 2017 the Company committed to a formal plan to dispose of the Gualcamayo mine and related exploration properties in Argentina (“Gualcamayo”) and initiated an active program to sell Gualcamayo. As the sale was considered highly probable at December 31, 2017, the assets and liabilities of Gualcamayo were classified as assets and liabilities (a disposal group) held for sale and presented separately under current assets and current liabilities, respectively. Immediately prior to the classification to assets and liabilities held for sale, the carrying amount of Gualcamayo was re-measured to its recoverable amount, being its FVLCD, the estimate of which, was supported by various sources including a formal bid received by the Company, external valuation reports and comparable trading company multiples. As a result, the Company recorded an impairment loss of $356.5 million in relation to Gualcamayo in the year ended December 31, 2017. As at June 30, 2018, there was no further write-down as the carrying amount of the disposal group did not fall below its fair value less costs to sell.
The Company continues to focus on the sale process and a sale transaction continues to be expected in 2018.
Gualcamayo is presented in the "Other Mines" reportable operating segment.
(c) | Canadian Exploration Properties |
On March 29, 2018, the Company completed the sale of certain jointly owned exploration properties of the Canadian Malartic Corporation (“CMC”) including the Kirkland Lake and Hammond Reef properties (the “Canadian Exploration Properties”) to Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (“Agnico”) for total cash consideration of $162.5 million. The Transaction was structured as a sale of assets by CMC (in which the Company holds a 50% indirect interest) pursuant to which Agnico acquired all of the Company's indirect 50% interest in the Canadian exploration assets of CMC.
| 13
At December 31, 2017, the sale was considered highly probable and accordingly, the assets and liabilities of the Canadian Exploration Properties were classified as assets and liabilities held for sale and presented separately under current assets and current liabilities, respectively. No impairment loss was recognized on reclassification to held for sale, as the FVLCD was higher than the carrying amount of the assets based on the sale price in the agreement. Upon sale, the Company recognized a gain of $39.0 million, which is included in other income (expenses) in the statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2018.
The Canadian Exploration Properties were presented in the Canadian Malartic reportable operating segment.
The components of assets and liabilities held for sale at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 relating to the above disposal groups are as follows:
June 30, 2018 | December 31, 2017 | |||||||||||
Gualcamayo | Canadian Exploration Properties | Gualcamayo | Total | |||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||
Current assets: | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 1.0 | $ | — | $ | 6.3 | $ | 6.3 | ||||
Inventories | 68.9 | — | 78.4 | 78.4 | ||||||||
Other financial assets | 0.8 | — | — | — | ||||||||
Other assets | 11.6 | — | 15.7 | 15.7 | ||||||||
82.3 | — | 100.4 | 100.4 | |||||||||
Property, plant and equipment | 133.4 | 98.4 | 130.8 | 229.2 | ||||||||
Other financial assets | — | 0.8 | — | 0.8 | ||||||||
Deferred tax assets | 11.2 | — | — | — | ||||||||
Goodwill and intangibles | 1.4 | 24.0 | 1.4 | 25.4 | ||||||||
Other assets | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
Total assets held for sale | $ | 228.3 | $ | 123.2 | $ | 232.6 | $ | 355.8 | ||||
Liabilities | ||||||||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||||||||
Trade and other payables | $ | 29.1 | $ | 0.4 | $ | 45.0 | $ | 45.4 | ||||
Other financial liabilities | 1.3 | — | 2.4 | 2.4 | ||||||||
Other provisions and liabilities | 8.0 | 0.1 | 7.8 | 7.9 | ||||||||
38.4 | 0.5 | 55.2 | 55.7 | |||||||||
Decommissioning, restoration and similar liabilities | 27.0 | 0.6 | 26.5 | 27.1 | ||||||||
Deferred tax liabilities | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
Other provisions and liabilities | 1.2 | — | 0.9 | 0.9 | ||||||||
Total liabilities relating to assets held for sale | $ | 66.6 | $ | 1.1 | $ | 82.6 | $ | 83.7 | ||||
Net assets held for sale | $ | 161.7 | $ | 122.1 | $ | 150.0 | $ | 272.1 |
5. REVENUE
The Company has recognized the following amounts relating to revenue in the condensed consolidated interim statements of operations:
For the three months ended June 30, | For the six months ended June 30, | |||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
Revenue from contracts with customers (a) | $ | 431.7 | $ | 426.7 | $ | 889.5 | $ | 826.4 | ||||
Revenue from other sources | ||||||||||||
Provisional pricing adjustments on concentrate sales | (0.2 | ) | 1.4 | (8.3 | ) | 5.2 | ||||||
$ | 431.5 | $ | 428.1 | $ | 881.2 | $ | 831.6 |
(a) | Disaggregation of Revenue from Contracts with Customers |
The following table disaggregates revenue from contracts with customers by metal and source mine. The table also includes a reconciliation of the disaggregated revenue from contracts with customers with disaggregated revenue reported in Note 21: Operating Segments.
| 14
Three months ended June 30, 2018 | Chapada | El Peñón | Canadian Malartic | Jacobina | Minera Florida | Other mines | Total | ||||||||||||||
Gold | $ | 35.8 | $ | 49.3 | $ | 117.3 | $ | 48.5 | $ | 22.2 | $ | 61.5 | $ | 334.6 | |||||||
Silver | — | 15.3 | 0.9 | — | — | — | 16.2 | ||||||||||||||
Copper | 80.9 | — | — | — | — | — | 80.9 | ||||||||||||||
Total revenue from contracts with customers | $ | 116.7 | $ | 64.6 | $ | 118.2 | $ | 48.5 | $ | 22.2 | $ | 61.5 | $ | 431.7 | |||||||
Provisional pricing adjustments | (0.2 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | (0.2 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total segment revenue | $ | 116.5 | $ | 64.6 | $ | 118.2 | $ | 48.5 | $ | 22.2 | $ | 61.5 | $ | 431.5 |
Three months ended June 30, 2017 | Chapada | El Peñón | Canadian Malartic | Jacobina | Minera Florida | Other mines | Total | ||||||||||||||
Gold | $ | 22.8 | $ | 52.8 | $ | 104.2 | $ | 42.3 | $ | 27.1 | $ | 100.0 | $ | 349.2 | |||||||
Silver | 0.7 | 19.1 | 0.6 | — | 1.5 | — | 21.9 | ||||||||||||||
Copper | 55.6 | — | — | — | — | — | 55.6 | ||||||||||||||
Total revenue from contracts with customers | $ | 79.1 | $ | 71.9 | $ | 104.8 | $ | 42.3 | $ | 28.6 | $ | 100.0 | $ | 426.7 | |||||||
Provisional pricing adjustments | 1.4 | — | — | — | — | — | 1.4 | ||||||||||||||
Total segment revenue | $ | 80.5 | $ | 71.9 | $ | 104.8 | $ | 42.3 | $ | 28.6 | $ | 100.0 | $ | 428.1 |
Six months ended June 30, 2018 | Chapada | El Peñón | Canadian Malartic | Jacobina | Minera Florida | Other mines | Total | ||||||||||||||
Gold | $ | 65.2 | $ | 104.4 | $ | 224.9 | $ | 92.3 | $ | 47.3 | $ | 155.7 | $ | 689.8 | |||||||
Silver | — | 31.4 | 2.7 | — | — | — | 34.1 | ||||||||||||||
Copper | 165.6 | — | — | — | — | — | 165.6 | ||||||||||||||
Total revenue from contracts with customers | $ | 230.8 | $ | 135.8 | $ | 227.6 | $ | 92.3 | $ | 47.3 | $ | 155.7 | $ | 889.5 | |||||||
Provisional pricing adjustments | (8.3 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | (8.3 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total segment revenue | $ | 222.5 | $ | 135.8 | $ | 227.6 | $ | 92.3 | $ | 47.3 | $ | 155.7 | $ | 881.2 |
Six months ended June 30, 2017 | Chapada | El Peñón | Canadian Malartic | Jacobina | Minera Florida | Other mines | Total | ||||||||||||||
Gold | $ | 47.4 | $ | 94.3 | $ | 186.6 | $ | 82.8 | $ | 56.0 | $ | 205.2 | $ | 672.3 | |||||||
Silver | 1.1 | 37.6 | 0.6 | — | 2.8 | — | 42.1 | ||||||||||||||
Copper | 112.0 | — | — | — | — | — | 112.0 | ||||||||||||||
Total revenue from contracts with customers | $ | 160.5 | $ | 131.9 | $ | 187.2 | $ | 82.8 | $ | 58.8 | $ | 205.2 | $ | 826.4 | |||||||
Provisional pricing adjustments | 5.2 | — | — | — | — | — | 5.2 | ||||||||||||||
Total segment revenue | $ | 165.7 | $ | 131.9 | $ | 187.2 | $ | 82.8 | $ | 58.8 | $ | 205.2 | $ | 831.6 |
(b) | Accounting Policies and Significant Judgements |
The policies described below have been applied in the preparation of the revenue numbers for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018. In the comparative periods, revenue was accounted for in accordance with the revenue policy disclosed in the Company’s Annual Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Gold and Silver
The Company sells gold and silver in bullion and doré form to customers, which are all major financial institutions.
Revenue is recognized when control of the gold or silver has transferred to the customer. For bullion sales, this is typically at the point in time when the bullion is credited to the metal account of the customer. For doré sales, this is typically at the point in time when the doré is shipped from the mine. Following the crediting of gold or silver to a customer’s metal account or the shipment of doré, the customer has legal title to, physical possession of, and the risks and rewards of ownership of the metal, and therefore, the ability to direct the use of, and obtain substantially all of the remaining benefits from, the metal.
Revenue is measured at the transaction price agreed under the contract and excludes any amounts collected on behalf of third parties. Payment of the transaction price is due immediately when the metal is transferred to the customer. A receivable is recognized when the metal is transferred
| 15
to the customer, as this is the point in time that the consideration is unconditional because only the passage of time is required before the payment is due.
Metal Concentrate
The Company sells concentrate from its Chapada mine in Brazil. The concentrate is sold to independent smelting companies for extraction of the metal contents, which are predominantly copper, with small quantities of gold and silver.
Revenue from concentrate sales is recognized when control of the concentrate has transferred to the customer, which is typically upon loading of the concentrate onto the shipping vessel for shipment to the customer. At this point in time, the customer has the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the concentrate, and is committed to accept and pay for the concentrate. Although legal title does not pass until receipt of the first provisional payment, the fact that under the contract the customer has the right to process the concentrate as soon as it is received, indicates that the customer has obtained control of the concentrate prior to the transfer of title - i.e. the customer has the ability to direct the use of, and obtain substantially all of the remaining benefits from, the concentrate.
Concentrate sales include provisional pricing features whereby the price is provisional at the time of sale, with the final sales price based on the market price at a future specified date and the final physical attributes (i.e. quantity of contained metals) of the concentrate determined after further processing and assessment. The price adjustments associated with changes in market price and the physical attributes of the concentrate give rise to variability in the consideration the Company will receive from the customer. The variability associated with the change in market prices is accounted for separately as a derivative.
At the point in time that control of the concentrate transfers to the customer, the Company recognizes revenue and a receivable (the latter, because the Company has determined it has an unconditional right to the consideration). Revenue is measured at the amount the Company expects to be entitled to - being the estimate of the price expected to be received upon final invoice (at the end of the quotational period) using the most recently determined estimate of metal quantity and the estimated forward price. The receivable is measured at fair value through profit or loss, and is marked to market through earnings each period prior to final settlement. The period between provisional and final invoicing is typically 3 to 4 months. The Company presents changes in the fair value of the receivable arising from provisionally priced contracts in the revenue line in the statement of operations.
Streaming Arrangements and Advanced Metal Sales
From time to time, the Company enters into arrangements with customers pursuant to which, the Company receives consideration in advance of the delivery of metals.
Under advanced metal sales, the Company receives advanced consideration against the delivery of a fixed quantity of a specified metal over a specified period.
The Company has entered into the following advanced metal sales agreements:
• | On January 10, 2018, the Company entered into an advanced metal sales agreement pursuant to which, the Company received advanced consideration of $125.0 million in exchange for approximately 40.3 million pounds of copper to be delivered in the second half of 2018 and the first half of 2019. |
Under streaming arrangements, the Company receives advanced consideration against the delivery of a portion of future metal production referenced to the mine(s) of the Company specified in the contract. In addition to the advanced consideration, the Company may also receive a cash payment as metals are delivered to the customer.
The Company has entered into the following streaming arrangements:
• | On October 27, 2015 the Company entered into three metal purchase agreements with Sandstorm pursuant to which, the Company received advanced consideration of $170.4 million against future deliveries of silver production related to Cerro Moro, Minera Florida and Chapada, copper production related to Chapada, and gold production related to Agua Rica. In addition to the advanced consideration, the Company receives cash payments equal to 30% of market price at the date of delivery. |
| 16
• | On March 31, 2016, the Company entered into a copper purchase agreement with Altius, pursuant to which, the Company received advanced consideration of $61.1 million against future deliveries of copper related to the Company's Chapada mine in Brazil. In addition to the advanced consideration, the Company receives cash payments equal to 30% of the market price at the date of delivery. |
The Company recognizes the advanced consideration as deferred revenue and recognizes the amounts in revenue as it satisfies its performance obligations to deliver metal to the customer over the life of the contract. In contracts for the delivery of gold or silver bullion, this is typically at the point in time when the metal is credited to the metal account of the customer. For copper sales, this is at the point in time when the copper, in the form of copper warrants, is delivered to the customer. Following the crediting of gold or silver to a customer’s metal account or the delivery of copper warrants, the customer has legal title to, physical possession of, and the risks and rewards of ownership of the metal, and therefore, the ability to direct the use of, and obtain substantially all of the remaining benefits from, the metal.
The Company determines the amortization of deferred revenue to the statement of operations on a per unit basis. In advanced metal sales arrangements, this is over the fixed number of ounces specified in the contract. In streaming arrangements, the estimated total quantity of metal expected to be delivered to the customer over the term of the contract is used. Subsequent changes to expected deliveries result in an adjustment to revenue in the year of change to retroactively adjust for the new number of ounces or pounds expected to be delivered under the contract.
Where consideration is received in advance of the Company’s performance of its obligation, there is an inherent financing component in the transaction. When the period between receipt of consideration and revenue recognition is greater than one year, the Company determines whether the financing component is significant to the contract.
Where a contract is determined to have a significant financing component, the transaction price is adjusted to reflect the financing. The discount rate used in adjusting the promised amount of consideration is the rate that would be reflected in a separate financing transaction between the Company and the customer at contract inception. This rate is not subsequently adjusted for any other changes over the contract term.
The accretion of the interest expense is recognized in the finance expense line in the statement of operations, unless capitalized to assets under construction in accordance with the Company’s policy on capitalized borrowing costs.
The Company estimates the current portion of deferred revenue based on quantities anticipated to be delivered over the next twelve months.
Critical Judgements in Applying Accounting Policies and Key Sources of Estimation Uncertainty
Application of Variable Consideration Constraint
The Company determines the amortization of deferred revenue to the statement of operations on a per unit basis using the expected quantity of metal (ounces for gold and silver and pounds for copper) that will be delivered over the term of the contract, which is based on geological reports and the Company’s LOM plan at contract inception. As subsequent changes to the expected quantity of metal to be delivered triggers a retrospective adjustment to revenue, management is required to estimate the ounces or pounds to be included in the denominator that will be sufficient such that subsequent changes are not expected to result in a significant revenue reversal. Accordingly, management includes reserves and portion of resources, which management is reasonably confident are transferable to reserves, in the calculation. With this approach, the Company considers that it is highly probable that changes in subsequent reserve and resource estimates will not result in a significant revenue reversal of previously recognized revenue.
| 17
6. OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSES
For the three months ended June 30, | For the six months ended June 30, | |||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
Change in provisions | $ | 8.4 | $ | (0.9 | ) | $ | 13.6 | $ | 0.7 | |||
Write-down of other assets | 4.2 | 7.3 | 5.8 | 4.7 | ||||||||
Gain on sale of Canadian Exploration Properties (Note 4(c)) | — | — | (39.0 | ) | — | |||||||
Gain on disposal of Brio Gold (Note 4(a)) | (32.0 | ) | — | (32.0 | ) | — | ||||||
Business transaction costs | 4.4 | 0.5 | 6.0 | 2.3 | ||||||||
(Gain) loss on sale of assets | (4.1 | ) | (0.2 | ) | (4.6 | ) | 0.5 | |||||
Mark-to-market loss (gain) on deferred share compensation | 0.6 | (0.8 | ) | 0.4 | (1.1 | ) | ||||||
Net mark-to-market loss on investments | 5.1 | (1.0 | ) | 6.1 | 2.7 | |||||||
Reorganization costs | 2.7 | 1.2 | 5.2 | 1.7 | ||||||||
Other expenses | 0.7 | 9.1 | 3.2 | 22.3 | ||||||||
Other (income) expenses | $ | (10.0 | ) | $ | 15.2 | $ | (35.3 | ) | $ | 33.8 |
7. FINANCE INCOME AND EXPENSE
For the three months ended June 30, | For the six months ended June 30, | |||||||||||
2018 | 2017 (restated) | 2018 | 2017 (restated) | |||||||||
Interest income | $ | 0.6 | $ | 0.6 | $ | 1.5 | $ | 1.8 | ||||
Unrealized gain on derivatives | — | — | 10.2 | — | ||||||||
Net foreign exchange gain | 4.3 | — | 1.1 | |||||||||
Finance income | $ | 4.9 | $ | 0.6 | $ | 12.8 | $ | 1.8 | ||||
Unwinding of discounts on provisions | $ | (4.4 | ) | $ | (5.6 | ) | $ | (9.4 | ) | $ | (10.6 | ) |
Interest expense on long-term debt | (15.9 | ) | (18.8 | ) | (34.4 | ) | (36.4 | ) | ||||
Fees on extinguishment of long-term debt | — | — | (14.7 | ) | — | |||||||
Unrealized loss on derivatives | (0.1 | ) | (0.7 | ) | (0.1 | ) | (3.8 | ) | ||||
Net foreign exchange loss | — | (2.4 | ) | — | (4.6 | ) | ||||||
Amortization of deferred financing, bank, financing fees and other (i) | (8.3 | ) | (4.0 | ) | (17.5 | ) | (7.2 | ) | ||||
Finance expense | $ | (28.7 | ) | $ | (31.5 | ) | $ | (76.1 | ) | $ | (62.6 | ) |
Net finance expense | $ | (23.8 | ) | $ | (30.9 | ) | $ | (63.3 | ) | $ | (60.8 | ) |
(i) | Included in other finance expense during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2018 is $4.5 million and $9.6 million, respectively of non-cash interest expense related to the financing component of deferred revenue contracts. Refer to Note 3(a)(i): Recent Accounting Pronouncements. |
| 18
8. INCOME TAXES
For the three months ended June 30, | For the six months ended June 30, | |||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
Current tax expense/(recovery) | ||||||||||||
Current income tax expense in respect of the current period | $ | 26.6 | $ | 20.0 | $ | 47.2 | $ | 26.4 | ||||
Adjustment for prior periods | 0.5 | (3.4 | ) | 1.2 | (1.6 | ) | ||||||
Impact of foreign exchange | 1.0 | 0.4 | 3.3 | 0.2 | ||||||||
Other | 3.1 | 2.8 | 6.0 | 5.2 | ||||||||
$ | 31.2 | $ | 19.8 | $ | 57.7 | $ | 30.2 | |||||
Deferred income tax expense/(recovery) | ||||||||||||
Deferred tax (recovery)/expense recognized in the current year | (98.2 | ) | (22.8 | ) | (98.6 | ) | (23.7 | ) | ||||
Adjustment for prior periods | 6.9 | (1.0 | ) | 7.0 | (2.6 | ) | ||||||
Impact of foreign exchange | 110.8 | 24.7 | 113.3 | (2.4 | ) | |||||||
19.5 | 0.9 | 21.7 | (28.7 | ) | ||||||||
Net income tax expense/(recovery) | $ | 50.7 | $ | 20.7 | $ | 79.4 | $ | 1.5 |
Income tax expense is recognized based on management's best estimate of the average annual income tax rate expected for the full financial year multiplied by the pre-tax income of the interim reporting period.
The Company records changes in foreign exchange rates related to income taxes in the income tax expense. As a result, the tax rate will fluctuate during the period with the changes in the Brazilian Real, Argentinean Peso and Canadian Dollar against the US Dollar. Under IFRS, the US Dollar value of non-monetary assets (mainly inventory and property, plant and equipment) is converted into local currency at the quarter-end exchange rate for the purposes of calculating tax owing on the future realization of these assets. This difference between the quarter-end exchange rate and the historical exchange rate results in a non-cash unrealized foreign exchange gain or loss, which is recorded as a deferred tax expense or recovery. When the US Dollar strengthens and local currencies weaken, such as in the current quarter, the non-monetary assets have a higher value in local currency, which results in higher notional taxes being owed and a foreign exchange loss being recorded in the deferred income tax expense. When the US Dollar weakens, the non-monetary asset have a lower value in the local currency, which results in less notional tax being owed and a foreign exchange gain being recorded in the deferred income tax expense. These foreign exchange differences will reverse as assets are depleted or the shares of the foreign subsidiary are sold.
The income tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2018 was 80.1% (2017 - negative 128.6%). Included in deferred taxes is the foreign exchange gain on the strengthening of the US Dollar of $111.7 million (2017 - recovery of $25.1 million), the non-recognition of deferred tax assets on losses in non-profitable entities of $111.8 million (2017 - $10.5 million) and the deductible local foreign exchange losses of negative $100.5 million (2017 - deductible local foreign exchange losses of negative $1.3 million).
9. EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
Earnings (loss) per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 was calculated based on the following:
For the three months ended June 30, | For the six months ended June 30, | |||||||||||
2018 | 2017 (restated) | 2018 | 2017 (restated) | |||||||||
Attributable to Yamana Gold Inc. equityholders | ||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) | $ | 18.0 | $ | (39.9 | ) | $ | (142.0 | ) | $ | (40.0 | ) |
Earnings (loss) per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares of the Company outstanding during the period. The diluted earnings (loss) per share reflects the potential dilution of common share equivalents, such as outstanding share options, in the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, if dilutive.
| 19
The weighted average number of shares used in the calculation of earnings (loss) per share for the three and six months ended June 30 were based on the following:
For the three months ended June 30, | For the six months ended June 30, | |||||||
(in thousands) | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||
Weighted average number of common shares - basic | 948,952 | 948,116 | 948,832 | 948,009 | ||||
Weighted average number of dilutive share options (i) | 1 | — | — | — | ||||
Weighted average number of dilutive Restricted Share Units (i) | 1,125 | — | — | — | ||||
Weighted average number of common shares - diluted (i) | 950,078 | 948,116 | 948,832 | 948,009 |
(i) | The outstanding equity instruments that could potentially dilute basic earnings per share in the future, but were not included because they were anti-dilutive in the calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per share for the six months ended June 30, 2018 were 894 share options and 1,030,547 restricted share units. |
10. SUPPLEMENTARY CASH FLOW INFORMATION
(a) | Non-Cash Investing and Financing Transactions |
For the three months ended June 30, | For the six months ended June 30, | |||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
Interest capitalized to assets under construction | $ | 4.3 | $ | 2.4 | $ | 8.3 | $ | 4.3 | ||||
Issue of common shares on vesting of restricted share units (Note 17(a)) | $ | — | $ | 1.0 | $ | 1.4 | $ | 2.0 |
(b) Net Change in Working Capital
For the three months ended June 30, | For the six months ended June 30, | |||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
Net decrease/(increase) in: | ||||||||||||
Trade and other receivables | $ | (9.1 | ) | $ | 8.3 | $ | (2.1 | ) | $ | 11.6 | ||
Inventories | (25.7 | ) | (6.1 | ) | (32.5 | ) | (17.1 | ) | ||||
Other assets | 9.3 | 3.2 | (11.9 | ) | (20.3 | ) | ||||||
Net (decrease)/increase in: | ||||||||||||
Trade and other payables | (18.8 | ) | (6.2 | ) | (70.0 | ) | (40.9 | ) | ||||
Other liabilities | (3.6 | ) | (6.2 | ) | (4.9 | ) | (13.0 | ) | ||||
Movement in above related to foreign exchange | (7.2 | ) | 8.8 | (17.5 | ) | 15.6 | ||||||
Net change in working capital (i) | $ | (55.1 | ) | $ | 1.8 | $ | (138.9 | ) | $ | (64.1 | ) |
(i) | Change in working capital is net of items related to Property, Plant and Equipment. |
| 20
(c) | Cash and Cash Equivalents |
As at | June 30, 2018 | December 31, 2017 | ||||
Cash at bank | $ | 114.2 | $ | 146.7 | ||
Bank short-term deposits | 0.2 | 2.2 | ||||
Total cash and cash equivalents (i) | $ | 114.4 | $ | 148.9 |
(i) | Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand, cash on deposit with banks, bank term deposits and highly liquid short-term investments with terms of less than 90 days from the date of acquisition. |
(d) Other Non-Cash Expenses/(Recoveries)
For the three months ended June 30, | For the six months ended June 30, | |||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
Write off of assets | $ | 4.9 | $ | 11.8 | $ | 9.9 | $ | 7.3 | ||||
Revaluation of employees' pension plan | 0.1 | 4.7 | 3.8 | 10.1 | ||||||||
Provision on indirect taxes | 1.1 | (0.9 | ) | (1.8 | ) | (3.7 | ) | |||||
Legal expenses | 5.9 | — | 9.6 | (2.5 | ) | |||||||
Other expenses | 2.4 | (4.1 | ) | 3.1 | 3.2 | |||||||
Total non-cash expenses | $ | 14.4 | $ | 11.5 | $ | 24.6 | $ | 14.4 |
11. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
(a) | Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities by Categories |
As at June 30, 2018 | Financial assets at amortized cost | FVOCI - equity instruments | FV - Hedging Instruments | Mandatorily at FVTPL - others | Other financial liabilities at amortized cost | Total | ||||||||||||
Financial assets | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 114.4 | $ | — | $ | 114.4 | ||||||
Trade and other receivables | 10.6 | — | — | — | — | 10.6 | ||||||||||||
Receivables from provisional copper sales | — | — | — | 17.6 | — | 17.6 | ||||||||||||
Investments in equity securities | — | 6.2 | — | — | — | 6.2 | ||||||||||||
Warrants | — | — | — | 3.8 | — | 3.8 | ||||||||||||
Derivative assets - Hedging instruments | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Derivative assets - Non-hedge | — | — | — | 3.5 | — | 3.5 | ||||||||||||
Other financial assets | 18.4 | — | — | — | — | 18.4 | ||||||||||||
Total financial assets | $ | 29.0 | $ | 6.2 | $ | — | $ | 139.3 | $ | — | $ | 174.5 | ||||||
Financial liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||
Total debt | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,698.3 | $ | 1,698.3 | ||||||
Trade and other payables | — | — | — | — | 245.5 | 245.5 | ||||||||||||
Derivative liabilities - Hedging instruments | — | — | 14.1 | — | — | 14.1 | ||||||||||||
Derivative liabilities - Non-hedge | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Other financial liabilities | — | — | — | — | 147.9 | 147.9 | ||||||||||||
Total financial liabilities | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 14.1 | $ | — | $ | 2,091.7 | $ | 2,105.8 |
| 21
As at December 31, 2017 | Loans and receivables | Available-for-sale | Fair value through profit or loss | Derivative instruments in designated hedge accounting relationships | Other financial liabilities at amortized cost | Total | ||||||||||||
Financial assets | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 148.9 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 148.9 | ||||||
Trade and other receivables | 8.1 | — | — | — | — | 8.1 | ||||||||||||
Receivables from provisional copper sales | — | — | 30.5 | — | — | 30.5 | ||||||||||||
Investments in equity securities | — | 4.6 | — | — | — | 4.6 | ||||||||||||
Warrants | — | — | 2.6 | — | — | 2.6 | ||||||||||||
Derivative assets - Hedging instruments | — | — | — | 6.7 | — | 6.7 | ||||||||||||
Derivative assets - Non-hedge | — | — | 2.5 | — | — | 2.5 | ||||||||||||
Other financial assets | 22.9 | — | — | — | — | 22.9 | ||||||||||||
Total financial assets | $ | 31.0 | $ | 4.6 | $ | 184.5 | $ | 6.7 | $ | — | $ | 226.8 | ||||||
Financial liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||
Total debt | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,857.7 | $ | 1,857.7 | ||||||
Trade and other payables | — | — | — | — | 345.4 | 345.4 | ||||||||||||
Derivative liabilities - Hedging instruments | — | — | — | 5.7 | — | 5.7 | ||||||||||||
Derivative liabilities - Non-hedge | — | — | 8.5 | — | — | 8.5 | ||||||||||||
Other financial liabilities | — | — | — | — | 164.6 | 164.6 | ||||||||||||
Total financial liabilities | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 8.5 | $ | 5.7 | $ | 2,367.7 | $ | 2,381.9 |
(b) | Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
i) | Fair Value Measurements of Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value |
The Company uses the following hierarchy for determining and disclosing the fair value of financial instruments that are measured at fair value:
Level 1: | Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company can access at the measurement date. |
Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.
The levels in the fair value hierarchy into which the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that are measured and recognized on the Condensed Consolidated Interim Balance Sheets at fair value on a recurring basis were categorized as follows:
June 30, 2018 | December 31, 2017 | |||||||||||||||||
Level 1 input | Level 2 input | Aggregate fair value | Level 1 input | Level 2 input | Aggregate fair value | |||||||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 114.4 | $ | — | $ | 114.4 | $ | 148.9 | $ | — | $ | 148.9 | ||||||
Receivables from provisional copper sales | — | 17.6 | 17.6 | — | 30.5 | 30.5 | ||||||||||||
Equity securities (Note 13(a)) | 6.2 | — | 6.2 | 4.6 | — | 4.6 | ||||||||||||
Warrants (Note 13(a)) | — | 3.8 | 3.8 | — | 2.6 | 2.6 | ||||||||||||
Derivative related assets (Note 13(a)) | — | 3.5 | 3.5 | — | 9.3 | 9.3 | ||||||||||||
$ | 120.6 | $ | 24.9 | $ | 145.5 | $ | 153.5 | $ | 42.4 | $ | 195.9 | |||||||
Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||
Derivative related liabilities (Note 13(c)) | $ | — | $ | 14.1 | $ | 14.1 | $ | — | $ | 14.2 | $ | 14.2 | ||||||
$ | — | $ | 14.1 | $ | 14.1 | $ | — | $ | 14.2 | $ | 14.2 |
At June 30, 2018, there were no financial assets and liabilities measured and recognized at fair value on a non-recurring basis.
| 22
There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during the six months ended June 30, 2018. At June 30, 2018, there were no financial assets or liabilities measured and recognized on the Condensed Consolidated Interim Balance Sheets at fair value that would be categorized as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.
ii) | Valuation Methodologies Used in the Measurement of Fair Value for Level 2 Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities |
Receivables from Provisional Copper Sales
The Company's copper concentrate sales are subject to provisional pricing with the final selling price adjusted at the end of the quotational period. At the end of each reporting period, the Company's accounts receivable relating to these contracts are marked-to-market based on quoted forward prices for which an active commodity market exists.
Warrants
The fair value of warrants is calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which uses a combination of quoted prices and market-derived inputs, including volatility estimates.
Derivative Related Assets and Liabilities
The fair value of derivative instruments is determined using either present value techniques or option pricing models that utilize a variety of inputs that are a combination of quoted prices and market-corroborated inputs. The Company continues to monitor the potential impact of the recent instability of the financial markets, and will adjust its derivative contracts for credit risk based upon the credit default swap spread for each of the counterparties as warranted.
iii) | Carrying Value Versus Fair Value |
Set out below is a comparison by class of the carrying amounts and fair value of the Company's financial instruments, other than those whose carrying amounts are a reasonable approximation of fair value:
June 30, 2018 | December 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||
Financial instrument classification | Carrying amount | Fair value (i) | Carrying amount | Fair value (i) | |||||||||
Debt | |||||||||||||
Senior unsecured notes | Other financial liabilities at amortized cost | $ | 1,464.7 | $ | 1,456.2 | $ | 1,754.8 | $ | 1,751.5 |
(i) | The Company's senior unsecured notes are accounted for at amortized cost, using the effective interest rate method. The fair value required to be disclosed is determined by discounting the future cash flows by a discount factor based on an interest rate of 5% which reflects the Company's own credit risk. |
Management assessed that the fair values of trade and other receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and other financial assets and liabilities approximate their carrying amounts, largely due to the short-term maturities of these instruments. Derivative assets and liabilities are already carried at fair value.
c) | Financial Instruments and Related Risks |
Market risk is the risk that changes in market factors, such as foreign exchange, commodity prices or interest rates will affect the value of the Company's financial instruments. Market risks are managed by either accepting the risk or mitigating it through the use of derivatives and other economic hedges. As at June 30, 2018 there are no substantial changes to the market risk described in Note 16: Financial Instruments to the Company's Consolidated Annual Financial Statements.
The Company manages its exposure to fluctuations in commodity prices, and foreign exchange rates by entering into derivative financial instruments from time to time, in accordance with the Company's risk management policy. Details of these contracts are included in Note 16: Financial Instruments to the Company's Consolidated Annual Financial Statements. The Company did not enter into any new contracts during the quarter.
| 23
d) | New Accounting Policies |
The below new accounting policies have been applied in the preparation of these Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements.
Changes in accounting policies resulting from the adoption of IFRS 9 have been applied retrospectively, except as described below.
• | The Company has taken an exemption not to restate comparative information for prior periods with respect to classification and measurement (including impairment) requirements. Therefore, comparative periods have been restated only for retrospective application of the cost of hedging approach for the time value of option contracts. Differences in the carrying amounts of financial assets and financial liabilities resulting from the adoption of IFRS 9 are recognized in retained earnings/(deficit) and reserves as at January 1, 2018. Accordingly, the information presented for 2017 does not generally reflect the requirements of IFRS 9 but rather those of IAS 39. |
• | The following assessments have been made on the basis of the facts and circumstances that existed at the date of initial application. |
◦ | The determination of the business model within which a financial asset is held. |
◦ | The designation and revocation of previous designations of certain financial assets and financial liabilities as measured at FVTPL. |
◦ | The designation of certain investments in equity instruments not held for trading as at FVOCI. |
• | Changes to hedge accounting policies have been applied prospectively except for the cost of hedging approach for the time value component of options, which has been applied retrospectively to hedging relationships that existed on or were designated after January 1, 2017. |
• | All hedging relationships designated under IAS 39 at December 31, 2017 met the criteria for hedge accounting under IFRS 9 at January 1, 2018 and are therefore regarded as continuing hedging relationships. |
i) | Classification and Measurement of Financial Assets |
On initial recognition, a financial asset is classified as measured at: amortized cost; FVOCI - debt investment; FVOCI - equity investment; or FVTPL. The classification of financial assets is generally based on the business model in which a financial asset is managed and its contractual cash flow characteristics. Derivatives embedded in contracts where the host is a financial asset in the scope of the standard are never separated. Instead, the hybrid financial instrument as a whole is assessed for classification.
A financial asset is measured at amortized cost if it meets both of the following conditions and is not designated as at FVTPL:
• | it is held within a business model whose objective is to hold assets to collect contractual cash flows; and |
• | its contractual terms give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding. |
A debt investment is measured at FVOCI if it meets both of the following conditions and is not designated as at FVTPL:
• | it is held within a business model whose objective is achieved by both collecting contractual cash flows and selling financial assets; and |
• | its contractual terms give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding. |
On initial recognition of an equity investment that is not held for trading, the Company may irrevocably elect to present subsequent changes in the investment’s fair value in OCI. This election is made on an investment-by-investment basis.
All financial assets not classified as measured at amortized cost or FVOCI as described above are measured at FVTPL. This includes all derivative financial assets. On initial recognition, the Company may irrevocably designate a financial asset that otherwise meets the requirements to be measured at amortized cost or at FVOCI as at FVTPL if doing so eliminates or significantly reduces an accounting mismatch that would otherwise arise.
A financial asset (unless it is a trade receivable without a significant financing component that is initially measured at the transaction price) is initially measured at fair value plus, for an item not at FVTPL, transaction costs that are directly attributable to its acquisition.
| 24
The following accounting policies apply to the subsequent measurement of financial assets.
Financial assets at amortized cost | These assets are subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method. The amortized cost is reduced by impairment losses (see ii) below). Interest income, foreign exchange gains and losses and impairment are recognized in profit or loss. Any gain or loss on derecognition is recognized in profit or loss. |
Financial assets at FVTPL | These assets are subsequently measured at fair value. Net gains and losses, including any interest or dividend income, are recognized in profit or loss. Refer to iii) below for derivatives designated as hedging instruments. |
Equity investments at FVOCI | These assets are subsequently measured at fair value. Dividends are recognized as income in profit or loss unless the dividend clearly represents a recovery of part of the cost of the investment. Other net gains and losses are recognized in OCI and are never reclassified to profit or loss. |
Debt investments at FVOCI | These assets are subsequently measured at fair value. Interest income calculated using the effective interest method, foreign exchange gains and losses and impairment are recognized in profit or loss. Other net gains and losses are recognized in OCI. On derecognition, gains and losses accumulated in OCI are reclassified to profit or loss. |
ii) | Impairment |
The Company recognizes a loss allowance for expected credit losses on financial assets that are measured at amortized cost. At each reporting date, the Company measures the loss allowance for the financial asset at an amount equal to the lifetime expected credit losses if the credit risk on the financial asset has increased significantly since initial recognition. If at the reporting date, the credit risk on the financial asset has not increased significantly since initial recognition, the Company measures the loss allowance for the financial asset at an amount equal to twelve month expected credit losses. Impairment losses on financial assets carried at amortized cost are reversed in subsequent periods if the amount of the loss decreases and the decrease can be objectively related to an event occurring after the impairment was recognized.
For trade receivables that are classified as financial assets at amortized cost, the Company applies the simplified approach permitted by IFRS 9, which requires expected lifetime losses to be recognized from initial recognition of the receivables.
iii) | Derivative Instruments and Hedge Accounting |
The Company uses derivative financial instruments to hedge its exposure to exchange rate fluctuations on foreign currency operating expenses and capital expenditures.
The Company formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk management objectives and strategies for undertaking hedge transactions. This process includes linking all derivative hedging instruments to forecasted transactions. Hedge effectiveness is assessed based on the degree to which the cash flows from the derivative contracts are expected to offset the cash flows of the underlying transaction being hedged.
When a derivative is designated as a cash flow hedging instrument, the effective portion of changes in fair value is recognized in other comprehensive income, net of tax. For hedged items other than the purchase of non-financial assets, the amounts accumulated in other comprehensive income are reclassified to the consolidated statements of operations when the underlying hedged transaction, identified at contract inception, affects profit or loss. When hedging a forecasted transaction that results in the recognition of a non-financial asset or a non-financial liability, the gains and losses previously deferred in equity are transferred from equity and included in the measurement of the initial carrying amount of the asset or liability.
Any ineffective portion of a hedge relationship is recognized immediately in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company has elected to exclude the time value component of options and the forward element of forward contracts from the hedging relationships, with changes in these amounts recorded in other comprehensive income and treated as a cost of hedging. For hedged items other than the purchase of non-financial assets, the cost of hedging amounts is reclassified to the consolidated statements of operations when the underlying hedged transaction affects profit or loss. When hedging a forecasted transaction that results in the recognition of a non-financial asset, the cost of hedging is added to the carrying amount of the non-financial asset.
When derivative contracts designated as cash flow hedges are terminated, expired, sold or no longer qualify for hedge accounting, hedge accounting is discontinued prospectively. Any amounts recorded in other comprehensive income up until the time the contracts do not qualify for hedge accounting remain in other comprehensive income. Amounts recognized in other comprehensive income are recognized in the
| 25
consolidated statements of operations in the period in which the underlying hedged transaction is completed. Gains or losses arising subsequent to the derivative contracts not qualifying for hedge accounting are recognized in the period incurred in the consolidated statements of operations.
If the forecasted transaction is no longer expected to occur, then the amounts accumulated in other comprehensive income are reclassified to the consolidated statement of operations immediately.
12. INVENTORIES
As at, | June 30, 2018 | December 31, 2017 | ||||
Product inventories | $ | 38.9 | $ | 35.6 | ||
Work in process | 11.7 | 14.1 | ||||
Ore stockpiles | 169.6 | 126.6 | ||||
Materials and supplies | 82.7 | 93.7 | ||||
$ | 302.9 | $ | 270.0 | |||
Less: non-current ore stockpiles included in other non-current assets (Note 13(b)) | $ | (151.0 | ) | $ | (106.5 | ) |
$ | 151.9 | $ | 163.5 |
For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2018, charges of $4.9 million and $9.5 million, respectively were recorded to adjust inventory to net realizable value (2017 - charges of $7.2 million and $4.2 million, respectively) which are included in cost of sales excluding depletion, depreciation and amortization in the condensed consolidated interim statements of operations.
13. SELECTED COMPOSITION NOTES
(a) | Other Financial Assets |
As at, | June 30, 2018 | December 31, 2017 | ||||
Derivative related assets | $ | 3.5 | $ | 9.3 | ||
Other receivables | 18.2 | 21.0 | ||||
Investments in financial securities (i) | 10.0 | 7.2 | ||||
Other | 0.2 | 1.8 | ||||
$ | 31.9 | $ | 39.3 | |||
Current | $ | 8.8 | $ | 13.2 | ||
Non-current | 23.1 | 26.1 | ||||
$ | 31.9 | $ | 39.3 |
(i) | Investments in financial securities include equity securities and warrants with a cost of $25.0 million (December 31, 2017 - $16.4 million) and a fair value of $10.0 million (December 31, 2017 - $7.2 million). |
(b) | Other Assets |
As at, | June 30, 2018 | December 31, 2017 | ||||
Non-current portion of ore stockpiles (Note 12) (i) | $ | 151.0 | $ | 106.5 | ||
Income tax recoverable and installments | 10.2 | 23.1 | ||||
Tax credits recoverable (ii) | 95.8 | 118.8 | ||||
Advances and deposits | 49.3 | 53.1 | ||||
Other long-term advances | 14.1 | 15.2 | ||||
$ | 320.4 | $ | 316.7 | |||
Current | $ | 107.1 | $ | 119.4 | ||
Non-current | 213.3 | 197.3 | ||||
$ | 320.4 | $ | 316.7 |
(i) | Non-current ore stockpiles represent material not scheduled for processing within the next twelve months at the Company's Chapada and Canadian Malartic mines. Comparatives, which were previously included in Property, Plant and Equipment, have been reclassified to conform to the change in presentation adopted in the current period. As at January 1, 2017, the non-current ore stockpile balance was $28.2 million. |
(ii) | Tax credits recoverable consist of sales taxes which are recoverable either in the form of a refund from the respective jurisdictions in which the Company operates or against other taxes payable and value-added tax. |
(c) | Other Financial Liabilities |
As at, | June 30, 2018 | December 31, 2017 | ||||
Royalty payable (i) | $ | 16.3 | $ | 18.1 | ||
Payable related to purchase of mineral interests (ii) | 10.9 | 10.8 | ||||
Severance accrual | 31.6 | 32.0 | ||||
Deferred share units/performance share units liability (Note 18) | 22.4 | 21.0 | ||||
Accounts receivable financing credit (iii) | 40.3 | 54.1 | ||||
Current portion of debt (Note 16) | 1.1 | 110.0 | ||||
Derivative related liabilities | 14.1 | 14.2 | ||||
Other | 26.4 | 28.6 | ||||
$ | 163.1 | $ | 288.8 | |||
Current | $ | 78.0 | $ | 203.1 | ||
Non-current | 85.1 | 85.7 | ||||
$ | 163.1 | $ | 288.8 |
(i) | Included in Royalty payable is an agreement with Miramar Mining Corporation (“Miramar” acquired by Newmont Mining Corporation) for a Proceeds Interest of C$15.4 million. The agreement entitles Miramar to receive payment of this interest over time calculated as the economic equivalent of a 2.5% net smelter return royalty on all production from the Company’s mining properties held at the time of Northern Orion entering into the agreement, or 50% of the net proceeds of disposition of any interest in the Agua Rica property until the Proceeds Interest of C$15.4 million is paid. Since inception, partial payments of $6.0 million and appreciation of the US Dollar have resulted in the liability being measured at $5.4 million as at June 30, 2018. Also included in Royalty payable is $10.8 million of amounts payable by Canadian Malartic. |
(ii) | Payable related to purchase of the remaining interests in Agua Fria. |
(iii) | Accounts receivable financing credit is payable within 30 days from the proceeds on concentrate sales. |
| 26
(d) | Other Provisions and Liabilities |
As at, | June 30, 2018 | December 31, 2017 | ||||
Other taxes payable | $ | 13.9 | $ | 15.8 | ||
Provision for repatriation taxes payable (i) | 22.9 | 22.9 | ||||
Provision for taxes | 21.5 | 24.4 | ||||
Deferred revenue on metal streaming arrangements - Altius (ii) | 59.8 | 57.5 | ||||
Deferred revenue on metal streaming arrangements - Sandstorm (iii) | 170.8 | 158.5 | ||||
Deferred revenue on advanced metal sales - other (iv) | 129.0 | — | ||||
Other provisions and liabilities | 59.0 | 74.2 | ||||
$ | 476.9 | $ | 353.3 | |||
Current | $ | 174.6 | $ | 56.7 | ||
Non-current | 302.3 | 296.6 | ||||
$ | 476.9 | $ | 353.3 |
(i) | The Company is subject to additional taxes in Chile on the repatriation of profits to its foreign shareholders. Total taxes in the amount of $22.9 million (December 31, 2017 - $22.9 million) have been accrued on the assumption that the profits will be repatriated. |
(ii) | On March 31, 2016, the Company entered into a metal streaming arrangement with Altius, pursuant to which, the Company received advanced consideration of $61.1 million against future deliveries of copper produced by the Company's Chapada mine in Brazil. The advanced consideration is accounted for as deferred revenue, with revenue recognized when copper is delivered to Altius. |
The following table summarizes the changes in deferred revenue:
2018 | |||
Balance as at January 1, 2018 | $ | 57.5 | |
Adjustment on initial adoption of IFRS 15 (Note 3(a)(i)) | 3.4 | ||
Adjusted balance at January 1, 2018 | $ | 60.9 | |
Recognition of revenue during the year | (1.1 | ) | |
$ | 59.8 | ||
Current portion | $ | 2.4 | |
Non-current portion | 57.4 | ||
Balance as at June 30, 2018 | $ | 59.8 |
(iii) | On October 27, 2015 the Company entered into three metal streaming arrangements with Sandstorm pursuant to which, the Company received advanced consideration of $170.4 million against future deliveries of silver related to production from Cerro Moro, Minera Florida and Chapada, copper production related to Chapada, and gold production related to Agua Rica. The advanced consideration is accounted for as deferred revenue, with revenue recognized when the respective metals are delivered to Sandstorm. |
The following table summarizes the changes in deferred revenue:
2018 | |||
Balance as at January 1, 2018 | $ | 158.5 | |
Adjustment on initial adoption of IFRS 15 (Note 3(a)(i)) | 13.0 | ||
Adjusted balance at January 1, 2018 | $ | 171.5 | |
Recognition of revenue during the year | (0.7 | ) | |
$ | 170.8 | ||
Current portion | $ | 8.0 | |
Non-current portion | 162.8 | ||
Balance as at June 30, 2018 | $ | 170.8 |
(iv) | On January 10, 2018, the Company entered into an advanced metal sales agreement pursuant to which, the Company received advanced consideration of $125.0 million in exchange for approximately 40.3 million pounds of copper to be delivered in the second half of 2018 and the first half of 2019. The advanced consideration is accounted for as deferred revenue, with revenue recognized as copper is delivered to the counterparty. As the Company received consideration more than a year in advance of completion of delivery, the Company has accounted for the financing component in the transaction. Accordingly, in the three and six months to June 30, 2018, the Company recognized interest expense of $2.0 million and $4.0 million respectively, with a corresponding increase to the deferred revenue balance. |
| 27
14. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Mining property costs subject to depletion (i) | Mining property costs not subject to depletion (ii) | Land, building, plant & equipment | Total | |||||||||
Cost, January 1, 2017 | $ | 5,860.4 | $ | 5,953.7 | $ | 2,745.3 | $ | 14,559.4 | ||||
Additions | 231.9 | 317.9 | 94.1 | 643.9 | ||||||||
Reclassification, transfers and other non-cash movements | 99.5 | (102.4 | ) | (29.1 | ) | (32.0 | ) | |||||
Change in decommissioning, restoration and similar liabilities | 47.4 | 0.5 | — | 47.9 | ||||||||
Disposals | 1.0 | (10.1 | ) | (28.4 | ) | (37.5 | ) | |||||
Reclassified as held for sale (Note 4) | (109.9 | ) | (129.8 | ) | (92.6 | ) | (332.3 | ) | ||||
Cost, December 31, 2017 | $ | 6,130.3 | $ | 6,029.8 | $ | 2,689.3 | $ | 14,849.4 | ||||
Additions | 42.6 | 194.0 | 28.2 | 264.8 | ||||||||
Reclassification, transfers and other non-cash movements | 650.9 | (944.9 | ) | 292.3 | (1.7 | ) | ||||||
Change in decommissioning, restoration and similar liabilities | (21.8 | ) | — | — | (21.8 | ) | ||||||
Reclassified as held for sale (Note 4) | (161.1 | ) | (106.9 | ) | (180.1 | ) | (448.1 | ) | ||||
Disposals | (0.1 | ) | (0.7 | ) | (4.5 | ) | (5.3 | ) | ||||
Cost, June 30, 2018 | $ | 6,640.8 | $ | 5,171.3 | $ | 2,825.2 | $ | 14,637.3 | ||||
Accumulated depletion and depreciation, January 1, 2017 | $ | 3,569.4 | $ | 2,081.2 | $ | 1,370.7 | $ | 7,021.3 | ||||
Depletion and depreciation for the year | 224.9 | — | 212.5 | 437.4 | ||||||||
Impairment | 129.7 | 146.3 | 80.5 | 356.5 | ||||||||
Disposals | — | (2.9 | ) | (13.0 | ) | (15.9 | ) | |||||
Eliminated on reclassification as held for sale (Note 4) | (49.8 | ) | — | (53.3 | ) | (103.1 | ) | |||||
Accumulated depletion and depreciation, December 31, 2017 | $ | 3,874.2 | $ | 2,224.6 | $ | 1,597.4 | $ | 7,696.2 | ||||
Depletion and depreciation for the period | 118.0 | — | 80.1 | 198.1 | ||||||||
Impairment (iii) | 90.7 | 78.3 | 101.4 | 270.4 | ||||||||
Eliminated on reclassification as held for sale (Note 4) | (97.0 | ) | — | (105.5 | ) | (202.5 | ) | |||||
Disposals | — | 1.1 | (3.0 | ) | (1.9 | ) | ||||||
Accumulated depletion and depreciation, June 30, 2018 | $ | 3,985.9 | $ | 2,304.0 | $ | 1,670.4 | $ | 7,960.3 | ||||
Carrying value, December 31, 2017 | $ | 2,256.1 | $ | 3,805.2 | $ | 1,091.9 | $ | 7,153.2 | ||||
Carrying value, June 30, 2018 | $ | 2,654.9 | $ | 2,867.3 | $ | 1,154.8 | $ | 6,677.0 |
(i) | The following table shows the reconciliation of capitalized stripping costs incurred in the production phase: |
As at, | June 30, 2018 | December 31, 2017 | ||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | 355.6 | $ | 285.3 | ||
Additions | 21.0 | 135.2 | ||||
Amortization | (19.7 | ) | (18.2 | ) | ||
Reclassified as held for sale (Note 4) | (105.2 | ) | (46.7 | ) | ||
Balance, end of period | $ | 251.7 | $ | 355.6 |
(ii) | Mining property costs not subject to depletion include: capitalized mineral reserves and exploration potential acquisition costs, capitalized exploration & evaluation costs, capitalized development costs, assets under construction, capital projects and acquired mineral resources at operating mine sites. |
(iii) | During the period, the Company recognized impairment charges on the Brio Gold mineral interests. Balance includes the amount in relation to the non-controlling interests of Brio Gold. Refer to Note 4: Divestitures for additional details. |
| 28
15. INVESTMENT IN ASSOCIATE
As at June 30, 2018, the Company held an approximate 20.5% interest in Leagold, which is accounted for using the equity method. The Company adjusts the financial results of the associate, where appropriate, to give effect to uniform accounting policies. The following table summarizes the change in the carrying amount of the Company's investment in associate:
2018 | |||
Balance as at January 1, 2018 | $ | — | |
Acquisition of interest in Leagold (Note 4(a)) | 140.5 | ||
Company's share of net earnings of Leagold | 0.5 | ||
Balance as at June 30, 2018 | $ | 141.0 |
Accounting Policy
An associate is an entity over which the Company has significant influence. Significant influence is the power to participate in the financial and operating policy of decisions of the investee but is not control or joint control over those policies. The Company is presumed to have significant influence if it holds, directly or indirectly, 20% or more of the voting power of the investee, unless it can be clearly demonstrated that the Company does not have significant influence.
The Company accounts for its investments in associates using the equity method. Under the equity method, the Company’s investment in an associate is initially recognized at cost and subsequently increased or decreased to recognize the Company's share of net earnings or losses of the associate, after any adjustments necessary to give effect to uniform accounting policies, any other movement in the associate's reserves, and for impairment losses after the initial recognition date. The total carrying amount of the Company's investments in associates also include any long-term debt interests which, in substance, form part of the Company's net investment. The Company’s share of an associate's losses that are in excess of its investment are recognized only to the extent that the Company has incurred legal or constructive obligations or made payments on behalf of the associate. The Company's share of earnings or losses of associates are recognized in net earnings during the period. Dividends and repayment of capital received from an associate are accounted for as a reduction in the carrying amount of the Company’s investment. Unrealized gains and losses between the Company and its associates are recognized only to the extent of unrelated investors’ interests in the associates. Intercompany balances and interest expense and income arising on loans and borrowings between the Company and its associates are not eliminated.
| 29
16. LONG-TERM DEBT
As at, | June 30, 2018 | December 31, 2017 | ||||
$300 million senior debt notes, issued December 4, 2017 | $ | 296.7 | $ | 297.5 | ||
$500 million senior debt notes, issued June 30, 2014 | 496.5 | 496.2 | ||||
$300 million senior debt notes, issued June 10, 2013 (vi) | 260.3 | 295.1 | ||||
$500 million senior debt notes, issued March 23, 2012 (v) | 411.2 | 484.6 | ||||
$270 million senior debt notes, issued December 18, 2009 (iv) | — | 181.4 | ||||
$1 billion revolving facility (ii) | 231.1 | 27.0 | ||||
$75 million revolving facility (iii) | — | 72.6 | ||||
Debt from 50% interest in Canadian Malartic | 2.5 | 3.3 | ||||
Total debt (i) | $ | 1,698.3 | $ | 1,857.7 | ||
Less: current portion of debt (Note 13(c)) | (1.1 | ) | (110.0 | ) | ||
Long-term debt | $ | 1,697.2 | $ | 1,747.7 |
(i) | Balances are net of transaction costs of $12.9 million, net of amortization (December 31, 2017 - $14.3 million). |
(ii) | During the six months ended June 30, 2018, the Company drew down $355.0 million and repaid $150.0 million on its revolving facility. The Company will, from time to time, repay balances outstanding on its revolving credit facility. During the quarter, the maturity date on the revolving facility was extended from September 2021 to June 2023 on substantially similar terms. |
(iii) | The $75 million revolving facility related to Brio Gold. The Company's interest in Brio Gold was disposed of on May 24, 2018. Refer to Note 4: Divestitures. |
(iv) | On January 29, 2018, the Company redeemed the 6.97% Series C senior debt notes due December 2019 at a make-whole price of 108.12. |
(v) | On March 23, 2018, the Company repaid the $75.0 million of 3.89% Series A senior debt notes, which matured. |
(vi) | On June 10, 2018, the Company repaid the $35.0 million of 3.64% Series A senior debt notes, which matured. |
The following is a schedule of debt principal repayments, which includes corporate debt, the revolving facility, and debt assumed from the 50% interest in Canadian Malartic:
Total debt | |||
2018 | $ | 1.1 | |
2019 | 1.4 | ||
2020 | 84.1 | ||
2021 | — | ||
2022 | 192.7 | ||
2023 | 496.2 | ||
2024 | 635.7 | ||
2025 | — | ||
2026 | — | ||
2027 | 300.0 | ||
$ | 1,711.2 |
| 30
17. SHARE CAPITAL
(a) | Common Shares Issued and Outstanding |
The Company is authorized to issue an unlimited number of common shares at no par value and a maximum of eight million first preference shares. There were no first preference shares issued or outstanding as at June 30, 2018 (December 31, 2017: nil).
For the six months ended | For the year ended | |||||||||
June 30, 2018 | December 31, 2017 | |||||||||
Number of common shares | Number of common shares | |||||||||
Issued and outstanding - 949,012,517 common shares | Amount | Amount | ||||||||
(December 31, 2017 - 948,524,667 common shares): | (In thousands) | (In millions) | (In thousands) | (In millions) | ||||||
Balance, beginning of year | 948,525 | $ | 7,633.7 | 947,798 | $ | 7,630.5 | ||||
Issued on vesting of restricted share units | 425 | 1.4 | 591 | 2.9 | ||||||
Dividend reinvestment plan (i) | 63 | 0.2 | 136 | 0.3 | ||||||
Balance, end of period | 949,013 | $ | 7,635.3 | 948,525 | $ | 7,633.7 |
(i) | The Company has a dividend reinvestment plan to provide holders of common shares a simple and convenient method to purchase additional common shares by electing to automatically reinvest all or any portion of cash dividends paid on common shares held by the plan participant without paying any brokerage commissions, administrative costs or other service charges. As at June 30, 2018, a total of 16,146,840 shares have subscribed to the plan. |
(b) | Dividends Paid and Declared |
For the three months ended June 30, | For the six months ended June 30, | |||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
Dividends paid | $ | 4.7 | $ | 4.7 | $ | 9.5 | $ | 9.6 | ||||
Dividends declared in respect of the period | $ | 4.8 | $ | 4.8 | $ | 9.6 | $ | 9.6 | ||||
Dividend paid (per share) | $ | 0.005 | $ | 0.005 | $ | 0.010 | $ | 0.010 | ||||
Dividend declared in respect of the period (per share) | $ | 0.005 | $ | 0.005 | $ | 0.010 | $ | 0.010 |
18. SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS
The total expense relating to share-based payments includes accrued compensation expense related to plans granted in the current period, plans granted in the prior period and adjustments to compensation associated with mark-to-market adjustments on cash-settled plans, as follows:
For the three months ended June 30, | For the six months ended June 30, | |||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
Accrued expense on equity-settled compensation plans | $ | 1.4 | $ | 0.7 | $ | 2.5 | $ | 1.7 | ||||
Accrued expense on cash-settled compensation plans | 1.9 | 0.6 | 1.7 | 1.3 | ||||||||
Total expense for instruments granted | $ | 3.3 | $ | 1.3 | $ | 4.2 | $ | 3.0 | ||||
Compensation expense for Brio Gold | 0.1 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 3.8 | ||||||||
Mark-to-market change on cash-settled plans | 0.3 | (0.8 | ) | — | (1.1 | ) | ||||||
Total expense recognized as compensation expense | $ | 3.7 | $ | 2.5 | $ | 4.5 | $ | 5.7 |
As at (In thousands) | June 30, 2018 | December 31, 2017 | ||||
Total carrying amount of liabilities for cash-settled arrangements (Note 13(c)) | $ | 22.4 | $ | 21.0 |
| 31
The following table summarizes the equity instruments outstanding related to share-based payments.
As at (In thousands) | June 30, 2018 | December 31, 2017 | ||
Share options (i) | 1,805 | 1,831 | ||
Restricted share units ("RSU") (ii) | 2,564 | 1,474 | ||
Deferred share units ("DSU") (iii) | 4,538 | 4,288 | ||
Performance share units ("PSU") (iv) | 3,265 | 2,521 |
(i) | During the six months ended June 30, 2018, 26,099 share options expired. |
(ii) | During the six months ended June 30, 2018, the Company granted 1,667,966 RSUs with a weighted average grant date fair value of C$4.15 per RSU; 153,907,RSUs were cancelled or forfeited; and a total of 424,500 RSUs vested and the Company credited $1.4 million (2017 - $2.0 million) to share capital in respect of RSUs that vested during the period. |
(iii) | During the six months ended June 30, 2018, the Company granted 249,871 DSUs and recorded an expense of C$0.9 million. During the first quarter of 2017, the Company entered into a derivative contract to mitigate the volatility of share price on DSU compensation, effectively locking in the exposure of the Company for 3 million DSUs (approximately 80% of outstanding DSUs) at a value of C$3.5002 per share. For the six months ended June 30, 2018, the Company recorded a mark-to-market gain on DSUs of $0.3 million and a mark-to-market loss on the DSU hedge of $0.3 million. |
(iv) | During the six months ended June 30, 2018, 1,220,140 PSU units were granted and 476,624 PSU units vested. For the new PSU plan granted during the first quarter of 2018, it has an expiry date on December 31, 2020 and had a fair value of C$4.17 per unit at June 30, 2018. |
19. NON-CONTROLLING INTERESTS
As at, | June 30, 2018 | December 31, 2017 | ||||
Agua De La Falda S.A. (i) | $ | 18.7 | $ | 18.7 | ||
Brio Gold Inc. (ii) | — | 115.2 | ||||
FOMICRUZ (iii) | 16.0 | — | ||||
$ | 34.7 | $ | 133.9 |
(i) | The Company holds a 56.7% interest in the Agua De La Falda ("ADLF") project along with Corporación Nacional del Cobre de Chile ("Codelco"). The ADLF project is an exploration project that includes the Jeronimo Deposit and is located in northern Chile. |
(ii) | The Company held approximately 53.6% of the issued and outstanding shares of Brio Gold as at December 31, 2017. On May 24, 2018, the Company completed the sale of its 53.6% controlling interest in Brio Gold to Leagold and deconsolidated the subsidiary. Refer to Note 4: Divestitures for further discussion. |
(iii) | During the three months ended June 30, 2018, the Company completed an arrangement with Fomento Minero de Santa Cruz S.E. ("FOMICRUZ") pursuant to which FOMICRUZ is entitled to certain subordinated shares in the legal entity which owns Cerro Moro. These subordinated shares entitle FOMICRUZ to a 5% interest in future dividends after the Company's investment in Cerro Moro, which includes construction and development along with acquisition costs, has been recovered in full. As part of the arrangement and as further consideration to the Company, the right to use the land related to the Bahía Laura properties, a significant land package to the west and south west of Cerro Moro, was obtained at an approximate value of $16.0 million. |
20. CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
The Company’s objectives in managing capital are to ensure sufficient liquidity to pursue its strategy of organic growth combined with strategic acquisitions, to ensure the externally imposed capital requirements relating to its long-term debt are being met, and to provide returns to its shareholders. The Company defines capital that it manages as net worth, which is comprised of total shareholders’ equity and debt obligations (net of cash and cash equivalents). Refer to Note 17: Share Capital and Note 16: Long-term Debt, respectively, for a quantitative summary of these items.
The Company manages its capital structure and makes adjustments to it in light of general economic conditions, the risk characteristics of the underlying assets and the Company’s working capital requirements. In order to maintain or adjust its capital structure, the Company, upon approval from its Board of Directors, may issue shares, pay dividends, or undertake other activities as deemed appropriate under the specific circumstances. The Board of Directors reviews and approves any material transactions out of the ordinary course of business, including proposals on acquisitions or other major investments or divestitures, as well as capital and operating budgets. The Company has not made any changes to its policies and processes for managing capital during the year.
The Company has the following externally imposed financial covenants on certain of its debt arrangements:
(a) | Tangible net worth of at least $2.3 billion. |
| 32
(b) | Maximum net total debt (debt less cash) to tangible net worth of 0.75. |
(c) | Leverage ratio (net total debt/EBITDA) to be less than or equal to 3.5:1. |
Not meeting these capital requirements could result in a condition of default by the Company. As at June 30, 2018, the Company has met all of the externally imposed financial covenants.
21. OPERATING SEGMENTS
The Company bases its operating segments on the way information is reported and used by the Company's chief operating decision maker ("CODM"), being the Company's senior management team. The results of operating segments are reviewed by the CODM in order to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segments and to assess their performance.
The Company considers each of its individual operating mine sites as reportable segments for financial reporting purposes. In addition to these reportable segments, the Company aggregates and discloses the financial results of other operating segments with similar economic characteristics as reviewed by the CODM, including exploration properties and corporate entities, under "Corporate and Other".
The following changes have been made to Company's reportable segments since December 31, 2017:
• | The Company's Cerro Moro mine, which was included in "Corporate and Other" at December 31, 2017, is now a separate reportable segment. On June 26, 2018, the Company announced that the Cerro Moro mine had achieved commercial production, and the assets associated with Cerro Moro now comprise 12% of the Company's total assets. |
• | The CODM reviews the results of operating mines that the Company does not intend to manage in the long-term and for which a disposal plan has been initiated, as one operating segment. Accordingly, Gualcamayo and Brio Gold, which were separate reportable operating segments at December 31, 2017 are now grouped into one reportable operating segment, "Other Mines". The Company's interest in Brio Gold was disposed of on May 24, 2018. Refer to Note 4: Divestitures. |
Comparatives have been adjusted to conform to the change in presentation adopted in the current period.
(a) | Information about Assets and Liabilities |
As at June 30, 2018 | Chapada | El Peñón | Canadian Malartic | Jacobina | Minera Florida | Cerro Moro | Other Mines | Corporate and Other (i) | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 786.6 | $ | 679.5 | $ | 1,749.1 | $ | 780.9 | $ | 330.6 | $ | 1,024.5 | $ | 228.4 | $ | 2,650.1 | $ | 8,229.7 | |||||||||
Total liabilities | $ | 253.5 | $ | 160.6 | $ | 448.6 | $ | 169.9 | $ | 100.3 | $ | 72.7 | $ | 66.5 | $ | 2,792.3 | $ | 4,064.4 |
As at December 31, 2017 | Chapada | El Peñón | Canadian Malartic | Jacobina | Minera Florida | Cerro Moro | Other Mines | Corporate and Other (i) | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 798.2 | $ | 828.4 | $ | 1,869.6 | $ | 783.3 | $ | 458.0 | $ | 897.6 | $ | 811.3 | $ | 2,316.9 | $ | 8,763.3 | |||||||||
Total liabilities | $ | 318.0 | $ | 221.5 | $ | 436.4 | $ | 162.0 | $ | 147.8 | $ | 75.5 | $ | 203.5 | $ | 2,751.3 | $ | 4,316.0 |
(i) | "Corporate and other" includes Agua Rica ($1.1 billion) (December 31, 2017 - $1.1 billion), other advanced stage development projects, exploration properties, corporate entities and the Company's investment in associate. |
| 33
(b) | Information about Profit or Loss |
For the three months ended June 30, 2018 | Chapada | El Peñón | Canadian Malartic | Jacobina | Minera Florida | Other Mines | Corporate and other | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Revenue (ii) | $ | 116.5 | $ | 64.6 | $ | 118.2 | $ | 48.5 | $ | 22.2 | $ | 61.5 | $ | — | $ | 431.5 | ||||||||
Cost of sales excluding depletion, depreciation and amortization | (47.0 | ) | (42.8 | ) | (50.2 | ) | (23.7 | ) | (18.8 | ) | (51.6 | ) | — | $ | (234.1 | ) | ||||||||
Gross margin excluding depletion, depreciation and amortization | $ | 69.5 | $ | 21.8 | $ | 68.0 | $ | 24.8 | $ | 3.4 | $ | 9.9 | $ | — | $ | 197.4 | ||||||||
Depletion, depreciation and amortization | (9.0 | ) | (22.4 | ) | (36.1 | ) | (8.8 | ) | (9.4 | ) | (6.2 | ) | (2.0 | ) | $ | (93.9 | ) | |||||||
Impairment of mining properties | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Segment income/(loss) | $ | 60.5 | $ | (0.6 | ) | $ | 31.9 | $ | 16.0 | $ | (6.0 | ) | $ | 3.7 | $ | (2.0 | ) | $ | 103.5 | |||||
Other expenses (i) | (40.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings before taxes | $ | 63.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense | (50.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings | $ | 12.4 |
For the three months ended June 30, 2017 (restated) | Chapada | El Peñón | Canadian Malartic | Jacobina | Minera Florida | Other Mines | Corporate and other | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Revenue (ii) | $ | 80.5 | $ | 71.9 | $ | 104.8 | $ | 42.3 | $ | 28.6 | $ | 100.0 | $ | — | $ | 428.1 | ||||||||
Cost of sales excluding depletion, depreciation and amortization | (49.9 | ) | (39.8 | ) | (47.2 | ) | (25.1 | ) | (18.4 | ) | (80.6 | ) | — | $ | (261.0 | ) | ||||||||
Gross margin excluding depletion, depreciation and amortization | $ | 30.6 | $ | 32.1 | $ | 57.6 | $ | 17.2 | $ | 10.2 | $ | 19.4 | $ | — | $ | 167.1 | ||||||||
Depletion, depreciation and amortization | (8.6 | ) | (17.1 | ) | (34.4 | ) | (12.7 | ) | (9.5 | ) | (27.9 | ) | (1.7 | ) | $ | (111.9 | ) | |||||||
Impairment of mining properties | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Segment income/(loss) | $ | 22.0 | $ | 15.0 | $ | 23.2 | $ | 4.5 | $ | 0.7 | $ | (8.5 | ) | $ | (1.7 | ) | $ | 55.2 | ||||||
Other expenses (i) | (77.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss before taxes | $ | (22.1 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense | (20.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss | $ | (42.8 | ) |
(i) | Other expenses are comprised of general and administrative expense of $23.9 million (2017 - $25.9 million), exploration and evaluation expense of $3.2 million (2017 - $5.3 million), share of earnings of associate of $0.5 million (2017 - $nil), net finance expense of $23.8 million (2017 - $30.9 million), other operating (income) expenses of $(10.0) million (2017 - $15.2 million). |
(ii) | Intersegment sales are eliminated in the above information reported to the Company's CODM. For the three months ended June 30, 2018, intersegment purchases included $400.1 million of gold, silver and copper purchased by the Company's corporate office from the Company's producing mines (2017 - $343.1 million) and revenue related to the sale of these metals to third parties was $400.1 million (2017 - $343.1 million). |
For the six months ended June 30, 2018 | Chapada | El Peñón | Canadian Malartic | Jacobina | Minera Florida | Other Mines | Corporate and other | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Revenue (ii) | $ | 222.5 | $ | 135.8 | $ | 227.6 | $ | 92.3 | $ | 47.3 | $ | 155.7 | $ | — | $ | 881.2 | ||||||||
Cost of sales excluding depletion, depreciation and amortization | (98.6 | ) | (89.3 | ) | (98.0 | ) | (47.7 | ) | (37.2 | ) | (122.5 | ) | — | $ | (493.3 | ) | ||||||||
Gross margin excluding depletion, depreciation and amortization | $ | 123.9 | $ | 46.5 | $ | 129.6 | $ | 44.6 | $ | 10.1 | $ | 33.2 | $ | — | $ | 387.9 | ||||||||
Depletion, depreciation and amortization | (20.7 | ) | (43.2 | ) | (66.9 | ) | (17.6 | ) | (19.4 | ) | (26.6 | ) | (3.6 | ) | $ | (198.0 | ) | |||||||
Impairment of mining properties | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (103.0 | ) | $ | — | $ | (103.0 | ) | ||||||
Segment income/(loss) | $ | 103.2 | $ | 3.3 | $ | 62.7 | $ | 27.0 | $ | (9.3 | ) | $ | (96.4 | ) | $ | (3.6 | ) | $ | 86.9 | |||||
Other expenses (i) | (155.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss before taxes | $ | (68.7 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense | (79.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss | $ | (148.1 | ) |
| 34
For the six months ended June 30, 2017 (restated) | Chapada | El Peñón | Canadian Malartic | Jacobina | Minera Florida | Other Mines | Corporate and other | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Revenue (ii) | $ | 165.7 | $ | 131.9 | $ | 187.2 | $ | 82.8 | $ | 58.8 | $ | 205.2 | $ | — | $ | 831.6 | ||||||||
Cost of sales excluding depletion, depreciation and amortization | (98.5 | ) | (76.9 | ) | (83.7 | ) | (48.2 | ) | (40.4 | ) | (151.3 | ) | — | (499.0 | ) | |||||||||
Gross margin excluding depletion, depreciation and amortization | $ | 67.2 | $ | 55.0 | $ | 103.5 | $ | 34.6 | $ | 18.4 | $ | 53.9 | $ | — | $ | 332.6 | ||||||||
Depletion, depreciation and amortization | (15.3 | ) | (32.9 | ) | (66.2 | ) | (23.6 | ) | (20.5 | ) | (55.7 | ) | (3.6 | ) | (217.8 | ) | ||||||||
Impairment of mining properties | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Segment income/(loss) | $ | 51.9 | $ | 22.1 | $ | 37.3 | $ | 11.0 | $ | (2.1 | ) | $ | (1.8 | ) | $ | (3.6 | ) | $ | 114.8 | |||||
Other expenses (i) | (155.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss before taxes | $ | (40.4 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense | (1.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss | $ | (41.9 | ) |
(i) | Other expenses are comprised of general and administrative expense of $50.1 million (2017 - $51.2 million), exploration and evaluation expense of $7.0 million (2017 - $9.4 million), share of earnings of associate of $0.5 million (2017 - $nil), net finance expense of $63.3 million (2017 - $60.8 million), other operating (income) expenses of $(35.3) million (2017 - $33.8 million) and expenses related to impairment of non-operating mineral properties of $71.0 million (2017 - $nil). |
(ii) | Intersegment sales are eliminated in the above information reported to the Company's CODM. For the six months ended June 30, 2018, intersegment purchases included $788.8 million of gold, silver and copper purchased by the Company's corporate office from the Company's producing mines (2017 - $718.4 million) and revenue related to the sale of these metals to third parties was $788.8 million (2017 - $718.4 million). |
(c) | Information about Capital Expenditures |
Capital expenditures | Chapada | El Peñón | Canadian Malartic | Jacobina | Minera Florida | Cerro Moro | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||
For the three months ended June 30, 2018 | $ | 10.9 | $ | 14.0 | $ | 19.3 | $ | 11.7 | $ | 9.9 | $ | 14.8 | $ | 23.4 | $ | 104.0 | ||||||||
For the three months ended June 30, 2017 | $ | 12.2 | $ | 17.1 | $ | 14.4 | $ | 9.7 | $ | 11.5 | $ | 44.7 | $ | 29.4 | $ | 139.0 | ||||||||
For the six months ended June 30, 2018 | $ | 16.5 | $ | 24.8 | $ | 40.6 | $ | 18.4 | $ | 19.6 | $ | 63.5 | $ | 52.6 | $ | 236.0 | ||||||||
For the six months ended June 30, 2017 | $ | 28.0 | $ | 31.7 | $ | 28.6 | $ | 20.3 | $ | 20.4 | $ | 79.9 | $ | 59.5 | $ | 268.4 |
22. CONTINGENCIES
Due to the size, complexity and nature of the Company’s operations, various legal and tax matters arise in the ordinary course of business. The Company accrues for such items when a liability is both probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the financial statements are issued that may result in a loss to the Company, but which will be resolved only when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The impact of any resulting loss from such matters affecting these Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company may be material.
Canadian Malartic
On August 2, 2016, Canadian Malartic General Partnership (“CMGP”), a general partnership jointly owned by the Company and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (the "Partnership"), was served with a class action lawsuit with respect to allegations involving the Canadian Malartic mine. The complaint is in respect of "neighbourhood annoyances" arising from dust, noise, vibrations and blasts at the mine. The plaintiffs are seeking damages in an unspecified amount as well as punitive damages in the amount of $20 million. The class action was certified in May 2017. In November 2017, a declaratory judgment was issued allowing the Partnership to settle individually with class members for 2017. The plaintiffs have since announced that they intend to file an application for leave to appeal this declaratory judgment. On December 11, 2017, hearings were completed in respect of certain preliminary matters, including the Partnership's application for partial dismissal of the class action. The Company and the Partnership will take all necessary steps to defend themselves from this lawsuit.
On August 15, 2016, the Partnership received notice of an application for injunction relating to the Canadian Malartic mine, which had been filed under the Environment Quality Act (Québec). A hearing related to an interlocutory injunction was completed on March 17, 2017 and a decision of the Superior Court of Québec dismissed the injunction. An application for permanent injunction is currently pending. The Company and the Partnership have reviewed the injunction request, consider the request without merit and will take all reasonable steps to defend against this injunction. These measures include a motion for the dismissal of the application for injunction, which has been filed and will be heard at a date
| 35
to be determined. While at this time the potential impacts of the injunction cannot be definitively determined, the Company expects that if the injunction were to be granted, there would be a negative impact on the operations of the Canadian Malartic mine, which could include a reduction in production.
On June 1, 2017, the Partnership was served with an application for judicial review to obtain the annulment of a governmental decree. The Partnership is an impleaded party in the proceedings. The applicant seeks to obtain the annulment of a decree authorizing the expansion of the Canadian Malartic mine. The Company and the Partnership have reviewed the application for judicial review, consider the application without merit and will take all reasonable steps to defend against this application. The hearing on the merits is scheduled to take place in October 2018. While the Company believes it is highly unlikely that the annulment will be granted, the Company expects that if the annulment were to be granted, there would be a negative impact on the operations of the Canadian Malartic mine, which could include a reduction in anticipated future production.
*************
| 36