Loans Held for Investment and Allowance for Loan Losses | 5. Loans Held for Investment and Allowance for Loan Losses The Bank originates loans to customers primarily in Texas. Although the Bank has diversified loan and leasing portfolios and, generally, holds collateral against amounts advanced to customers, its debtors’ ability to honor their contracts is substantially dependent upon the general economic conditions of the region and of the industries in which its debtors operate, which consist primarily of agribusiness, construction, energy, real estate and wholesale/retail trade. The Hilltop Broker-Dealers make loans to customers and correspondents through transactions originated by both employees and independent retail representatives throughout the United States. The Hilltop Broker-Dealers control risk by requiring customers to maintain collateral in compliance with various regulatory and internal guidelines, which may vary based upon market conditions. Securities owned by customers and held as collateral for loans are not included in the consolidated financial statements. As previously discussed, the loans acquired in the FNB Transaction were subject to loss-share agreements with the FDIC. At the close of business on September 30, 2018, the loss-share agreements for commercial assets with the FDIC expired, except for certain obligations on the part of the Bank that survived. On October 17, 2018, the Bank and the FDIC entered into a Termination Agreement pursuant to which all rights and obligations of the Bank and the FDIC under the FDIC loss-share agreements were resolved and terminated. Accordingly, loans which were previously referred to as either “covered loans” if covered by the loss-share agreements or otherwise “non-covered loans” are now collectively referred to as “loans held for investment.” Loans that were previously covered by the FDIC loss-share agreements are included in the “covered” portfolio segment as of December 31, 2017 and prior. The majority of the loans previously covered by the FDIC loss-share agreements are comprised primarily of commercial real estate and 1-4 family residential loans. Loans held for investment summarized by portfolio segment are as follows (in thousands). December 31, 2018 2017 Commercial real estate $ 2,940,120 $ 2,582,167 Commercial and industrial 1,508,451 1,351,418 Construction and land development 932,909 962,605 1-4 family residential 679,263 429,357 Mortgage warehouse 243,806 329,787 Consumer 47,546 40,446 Broker-dealer (1) 578,363 577,889 Covered — 182,129 6,930,458 6,455,798 Allowance for loan losses (59,486) (63,686) Total loans held for investment, net of allowance $ 6,870,972 $ 6,392,112 (1) Primarily represents margin loans to customers and correspondents associated with broker-dealer segment operations. The Bank has lending policies in place with the goal of establishing an asset portfolio that will provide a return on stockholders’ equity sufficient to maintain capital to assets ratios that meet or exceed established regulations. Loans are underwritten with careful consideration of the borrower’s financial condition, the specific purpose of the loan, the primary sources of repayment and any collateral pledged to secure the loan. Underwriting procedures address financial components based on the size and complexity of the credit. The financial components include, but are not limited to, current and projected cash flows, shock analysis and/or stress testing, and trends in appropriate balance sheet and statement of operations ratios. The Bank’s loan policy provides specific underwriting guidelines by portfolio segment, including commercial and industrial, real estate, construction and land development, and consumer loans. The guidelines for each individual portfolio segment set forth permissible and impermissible loan types. With respect to each loan type, the guidelines within the Bank’s loan policy provide minimum requirements for the underwriting factors listed above. The Bank’s underwriting procedures also include an analysis of any collateral and guarantor. Collateral analysis includes a complete description of the collateral, as well as determined values, monitoring requirements, loan to value ratios, concentration risk, appraisal requirements and other information relevant to the collateral being pledged. Guarantor analysis includes liquidity and cash flow evaluation based on the significance with which the guarantors are expected to serve as secondary repayment sources. The Bank maintains a loan review department that reviews credit risk in response to both external and internal factors that potentially impact the performance of either individual loans or the overall loan portfolio. The loan review process reviews the creditworthiness of borrowers and determines compliance with the loan policy. The loan review process complements and reinforces the risk identification and assessment decisions made by lenders and credit personnel. Results of these reviews are presented to management and the Bank’s board of directors. In connection with the Bank Transactions, the Company acquired loans both with and without evidence of credit quality deterioration since origination. The following table presents the carrying values and the outstanding balances of PCI loans (in thousands). December 31, 2018 2017 Carrying amount $ 93,072 $ 124,317 Outstanding balance 172,808 230,083 Changes in the accretable yield for PCI loans were as follows (in thousands). Year Ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016 Balance, beginning of year $ 98,846 $ 156,847 $ 194,463 Additions 340 — — Reclassifications from nonaccretable difference, net (1) 26,166 12,946 47,407 Disposals of loans (1,226) (1,663) — Accretion (43,433) (69,284) (84,536) Transfer of loans to OREO (2) — — (487) Balance, end of year $ 80,693 $ 98,846 $ 156,847 (1) Reclassifications from nonaccretable difference are primarily due to net increases in expected cash flows in the quarterly recasts. Reclassifications to nonaccretable difference occur when accruing loans are moved to non-accrual and expected cash flows are no longer predictable and the accretable yield is eliminated. (2) Transfer of loans to OREO is the difference between the value removed from the pool and the expected cash flows for the loan. The remaining nonaccretable difference for PCI loans was $64.2 million and $91.9 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. During 2018, 2017 and 2016, a combination of factors affecting the inputs to the Bank’s quarterly recast process led to the reclassifications from nonaccretable difference to accretable yield. These transfers resulted from revised cash flows that reflect better-than-expected performance of the PCI loan portfolio acquired in the FNB Transaction as a result of the Bank’s strategic decision to dedicate resources to the liquidation of those loans acquired in the FNB Transaction during the noted periods. Impaired loans exhibit a clear indication that the borrower’s cash flow may not be sufficient to meet principal and interest payments, which is generally when a loan is 90 days past due unless the asset is both well secured and in the process of collection. Impaired loans include non-accrual loans, troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”), PCI loans and partially charged-off loans. The amounts shown in following tables include loans accounted for on an individual basis, as well as acquired Pooled Loans. For Pooled Loans, the recorded investment with allowance and the related allowance consider impairment measured at the pool level. Impaired loans, segregated between those considered to be PCI loans and those without credit impairment at acquisition, are summarized by class in the following tables (in thousands). Unpaid Recorded Recorded Total Contractual Investment with Investment with Recorded Related December 31, 2018 Principal Balance No Allowance Allowance Investment Allowance PCI Commercial real estate: Non-owner occupied $ 42,668 $ 5,549 $ 7,540 $ 13,089 $ 1,125 Owner occupied 36,246 11,657 2,967 14,624 304 Commercial and industrial 27,403 5,491 1,068 6,559 72 Construction and land development 10,992 74 390 464 92 1-4 family residential 106,503 646 57,681 58,327 1,299 Mortgage warehouse — — — — — Consumer 2,185 9 — 9 — Broker-dealer — — — — — 225,997 23,426 69,646 93,072 2,892 Non-PCI Commercial real estate: Non-owner occupied — — — — — Owner occupied 5,231 4,098 — 4,098 — Commercial and industrial 22,277 9,891 1,740 11,631 721 Construction and land development 3,430 2,711 535 3,246 31 1-4 family residential 8,695 6,922 — 6,922 — Mortgage warehouse — — — — — Consumer 149 42 — 42 — Broker-dealer — — — — — 39,782 23,664 2,275 25,939 752 $ 265,779 $ 47,090 $ 71,921 $ 119,011 $ 3,644 Unpaid Recorded Recorded Total Contractual Investment with Investment with Recorded Related December 31, 2017 Principal Balance No Allowance Allowance Investment Allowance PCI Commercial real estate: Non-owner occupied $ 20,155 $ 7,770 $ 8,207 $ 15,977 $ 722 Owner occupied 20,042 3,067 6,115 9,182 670 Commercial and industrial 19,752 3,610 2,489 89 Construction and land development 2,001 428 1,010 1,438 215 1-4 family residential 7,001 2,053 2,328 4,381 324 Mortgage warehouse — — — — — Consumer 2,377 12 115 127 18 Broker-dealer — — — — — Covered 226,889 2,641 84,472 87,113 2,697 298,217 19,581 104,736 124,317 4,735 Non-PCI Commercial real estate: Non-owner occupied — — — — — Owner occupied 15,504 10,934 3,686 14,620 932 Commercial and industrial 24,427 15,924 2,072 17,996 365 Construction and land development 668 — 611 611 93 1-4 family residential 1,596 1,177 — 1,177 — Mortgage warehouse — — — — — Consumer 162 56 — 56 — Broker-dealer — — — — — Covered 6,341 5,382 — 5,382 — 48,698 33,473 6,369 39,842 1,390 $ 346,915 $ 53,054 $ 111,105 $ 164,159 $ 6,125 Average investment in impaired loans is summarized by class in the following table (in thousands). Year Ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016 Commercial real estate: Non-owner occupied $ 14,533 $ 16,623 $ 19,871 Owner occupied 21,262 25,307 25,754 Commercial and industrial 21,143 19,189 20,216 Construction and land development 2,880 3,136 4,744 1-4 family residential 35,404 5,797 6,474 Mortgage warehouse — — — Consumer 117 361 659 Broker-dealer — — — Covered 46,248 $ 141,587 $ $ Non-accrual loans, excluding those classified as held for sale, are summarized by class in the following table (in thousands). December 31, December 31, 2018 2017 Commercial real estate: Non-owner occupied $ 1,226 $ — Owner occupied 4,098 14,620 Commercial and industrial 14,870 20,878 Construction and land development 3,278 611 1-4 family residential 7,026 1,614 Mortgage warehouse — — Consumer 41 56 Broker-dealer — — Covered — 5,104 $ 30,539 $ 42,883 At December 31, 2018 and 2017, non-accrual loans included PCI loans of $4.9 million and $3.3 million, respectively, for which discount accretion has been suspended because the extent and timing of cash flows from these PCI loans can no longer be reasonably estimated. In addition to the non-accrual loans in the table above, $3.4 million and $2.7 million of real estate loans secured by residential properties and classified as held for sale were in non-accrual status at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Interest income, including recoveries and cash payments, recorded on impaired loans was $1.4 million, $1.7 million and $1.3 million during 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Except as noted above, PCI loans are considered to be performing due to the application of the accretion method. The Bank classifies loan modifications as TDRs when it concludes that it has both granted a concession to a debtor and that the debtor is experiencing financial difficulties. Loan modifications are typically structured to create affordable payments for the debtor and can be achieved in a variety of ways. The Bank modifies loans by reducing interest rates and/or lengthening loan amortization schedules. The Bank may also reconfigure a single loan into two or more loans (“A/B Note”). The typical A/B Note restructure results in a “bad” loan which is charged off and a “good” loan or loans, the terms of which comply with the Bank’s customary underwriting policies. The debt charged off on the “bad” loan is not forgiven to the debtor. There were no TDRs granted during 2018. Information regarding TDRs granted during 2017 and 2016 is shown in the following table (in thousands). At December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Bank had nominal unadvanced commitments to borrowers whose loans have been restructured in TDRs. Year Ended December 31, 2017 Year Ended December 31, 2016 Number of Balance at Balance at Number of Balance at Balance at Loans Extension End of Period Loans Extension End of Period Commercial real estate: Non-owner occupied — $ — $ — — $ — $ — Owner occupied 2 4,775 4,629 — — — Commercial and industrial 1 1,357 1,186 1 1,196 944 Construction and land development 1 655 611 — — — 1-4 family residential — — — — — — Mortgage warehouse — — — — — — Consumer — — — — — — Broker-dealer — — — — — — Covered — — — — — — 4 $ 6,787 $ 6,426 1 $ 1,196 $ 944 All of the loan modifications included in the table above involved payment term extensions. The Bank did not grant principal reductions on any restructured loans during 2018, 2017 or 2016. There were no TDRs granted during the twelve months preceding December 31, 2018, for which a payment was at least 30 days past due. The following table presents information regarding TDRs granted during the twelve months preceding December 31, 2017, for which a payment was at least 30 days past due (dollars in thousands). Twelve Months Preceding December 31, 2017 Number of Balance at Balance at Loans Extension End of Period Commercial real estate: Non-owner occupied — $ — $ — Owner occupied 1 1,481 1,352 Commercial and industrial — — — Construction and land development 1 655 611 1-4 family residential — — — Mortgage warehouse — — — Consumer — — — Broker-dealer — — — Covered — — — 2 $ 2,136 $ 1,963 An analysis of the aging of the Company’s loan portfolio is shown in the following tables (in thousands). Accruing Loans Loans Past Due Loans Past Due Loans Past Due Total Current PCI Total Past Due December 31, 2018 30-59 Days 60-89 Days 90 Days or More Past Due Loans Loans Loans Loans 90 Days or More Commercial real estate: Non-owner occupied $ 1,174 $ 199 $ — $ 1,373 $ 1,708,160 $ 13,089 $ 1,722,622 $ — Owner occupied 1,364 — 4,173 5,537 1,197,337 14,624 1,217,498 75 Commercial and industrial 1,792 1,049 11,051 13,892 1,488,000 6,559 1,508,451 3 Construction and land development 3,549 — — 3,549 928,896 464 932,909 — 1-4 family residential 5,987 2,484 1,950 10,421 610,515 58,327 679,263 — Mortgage warehouse — — — — 243,806 — 243,806 — Consumer 254 147 — 401 47,136 9 47,546 — Broker-dealer — — — — 578,363 — 578,363 — $ 14,120 $ 3,879 $ 17,174 $ 35,173 $ 6,802,213 $ 93,072 $ 6,930,458 $ 78 Accruing Loans Loans Past Due Loans Past Due Loans Past Due Total Current PCI Total Past Due December 31, 2017 30-59 Days 60-89 Days 90 Days or More Past Due Loans Loans Loans Loans 90 Days or More Commercial real estate: Non-owner occupied $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 1,473,942 $ 15,977 $ 1,489,919 $ — Owner occupied 442 — 2,195 2,637 1,080,429 9,182 1,092,248 — Commercial and industrial 2,702 312 5,714 1,336,591 6,099 1,351,418 640 Construction and land development 1,685 101 — 1,786 959,381 1,438 962,605 — 1-4 family residential 1,490 1,290 418 3,198 421,778 4,381 429,357 — Mortgage warehouse — — — 329,787 — 329,787 — Consumer 194 20 — 214 40,105 127 40,446 — Broker-dealer — — — — 577,889 — 577,889 — Covered 5,871 1,324 3,226 10,421 84,595 87,113 182,129 283 $ 12,384 $ 3,047 $ 11,553 $ 26,984 $ 6,304,497 $ 124,317 $ 6,455,798 $ 923 In addition to the loans shown in the table above, PrimeLending had $83.1 million and $84.5 million of loans included in loans held for sale (with an aggregate unpaid principal balance of $84.0 million and $85.2 million, respectively) that were 90 days past due and accruing interest at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. These loans are guaranteed by U.S. government agencies and include loans that are subject to repurchase, or have been repurchased, by PrimeLending. Management tracks credit quality trends on a quarterly basis related to: (i) past due levels, (ii) non-performing asset levels, (iii) classified loan levels, (iv) net charge-offs, and (v) general economic conditions in state and local markets. The Company utilizes a risk grading matrix to assign a risk grade to each of the loans in its portfolio with the exception of broker-dealer loans. A risk rating is assigned based on an assessment of the borrower’s management, collateral position, financial capacity, and economic factors. The general characteristics of the various risk grades are described below. Pass — “Pass” loans present a range of acceptable risks to the Company. Loans that would be considered virtually risk-free are rated Pass — low risk. Loans that exhibit sound standards based on the grading factors above and present a reasonable risk to the Company are rated Pass — normal risk. Loans that exhibit a minor weakness in one or more of the grading criteria but still present an acceptable risk to the Company are rated Pass — high risk. Special Mention — “Special Mention” loans have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in a deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loans and weaken the Company’s credit position at some future date. Special Mention loans are not adversely classified and do not expose the Company to sufficient risk to require adverse classification. Substandard — “Substandard” loans are inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the obligor or the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified must have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Many substandard loans are considered impaired. PCI — “PCI” loans exhibited evidence of credit deterioration at acquisition that made it probable that all contractually required principal payments would not be collected. The following tables present the internal risk grades of loans, as previously described, in the portfolio by class (in thousands). December 31, 2018 Pass Special Mention Substandard PCI Total Commercial real estate: Non-owner occupied $ 1,673,424 $ — $ 36,109 $ 13,089 $ 1,722,622 Owner occupied 1,175,225 2,083 25,566 14,624 1,217,498 Commercial and industrial 1,433,227 15,320 53,345 6,559 1,508,451 Construction and land development 929,130 — 3,315 464 932,909 1-4 family residential 601,264 393 19,279 58,327 679,263 Mortgage warehouse 243,806 — — — 243,806 Consumer 47,416 — 121 9 47,546 Broker-dealer 578,363 — — — 578,363 $ 6,681,855 $ 17,796 $ 137,735 $ 93,072 $ 6,930,458 December 31, 2017 Pass Special Mention Substandard PCI Total Commercial real estate: Non-owner occupied $ 1,460,758 $ 6,408 $ 6,776 $ 15,977 $ 1,489,919 Owner occupied 1,030,611 1,239 51,216 9,182 1,092,248 Commercial and industrial 1,275,489 17,354 52,476 6,099 1,351,418 Construction and land development 958,157 2,259 751 1,438 962,605 1-4 family residential 419,317 — 5,659 4,381 429,357 Mortgage warehouse 329,787 — — — 329,787 Consumer 40,211 — 108 127 40,446 Broker-dealer 577,889 — — — 577,889 Covered 81,583 356 13,077 87,113 182,129 $ 6,173,802 $ 27,616 $ 130,063 $ 124,317 $ 6,455,798 Allowance for Loan Losses It is management’s responsibility to, at the end of each quarter, or more frequently as deemed necessary, analyze the level of the allowance for loan losses to ensure that it is appropriate for the estimated credit losses in the portfolio. Estimated credit losses are the probable current amount of loans that the Company will be unable to collect given facts and circumstances as of the evaluation date. When management determines that a loan, or portion thereof is uncollectible, the loan, or portion thereof, is charged-off against the allowance for loan losses, or for acquired loans accounted for in pools, charged against either the pool discount or the post-acquisition allowance. Recoveries on charge-offs of loans acquired in the Bank Transactions that occurred prior to their acquisition represent contractual cash flows not expected to be collected and are recorded as accretion income. Recoveries on acquired loans charged-off subsequent to their acquisition are credited to the allowance for loan loss, except for recoveries on loans accounted for in pools, which are credited to the pool discount. The Company has developed a methodology that seeks to determine an allowance within the scope of the Receivables and Contingencies Topics of the ASC. Each of the loans that has been determined to be impaired is within the scope of the Receivables Topic. Impaired loans that are equal to or greater than $0.5 million are individually evaluated using one of three impairment measurement methods as of the evaluation date: (1) the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective rate, (2) the loan’s observable market price, or (3) the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Specific reserves are provided in the estimate of the allowance based on the measurement of impairment under these three methods, except for collateral dependent loans, which require the fair value method. All non-impaired loans are within the scope of the Contingencies Topic. Estimates of loss for the Contingencies Topic are calculated based on historical loss, adjusted for qualitative or environmental factors. The Bank uses a rolling three year average net loss rate to calculate historical loss factors. The analysis is conducted by call report loan category, and further disaggregates commercial and industrial loans by collateral type. The analysis uses net charge-off experience by considering charge-offs and recoveries in determining the loss rate. The historical loss calculation for the quarter is calculated by dividing the current quarter net charge-offs for each loan category by the quarter ended loan category balance. The Bank utilizes a weighted average loss rate to better represent recent trends. While historical loss experience provides a reasonable starting point for the analysis, historical losses are not the sole basis upon which the Company determines the appropriate level for the allowance for loan losses. Management considers recent qualitative or environmental factors that are likely to cause estimated credit losses associated with the existing portfolio to differ from historical loss experience, including but not limited to: changes in the volume and severity of past due, non-accrual and classified loans; changes in the nature, volume and terms of loans in the portfolio; changes in lending policies and procedures; changes in economic and business conditions and developments that affect the collectability of the portfolio; changes in lending management and staff; changes in the loan review system and the degree of oversight by the Bank’s board of directors; and any concentrations of credit and changes in the level of such concentrations. Changes in the volume and severity of past due, non-accrual and classified loans, as well as changes in the nature, volume and terms of loans in the portfolio are key indicators of changes that could indicate a necessary adjustment to the historical loss factors. Classified loans are defined as loans having a well-defined weakness or weaknesses related to the borrower's financial capacity or to pledged collateral that may jeopardize the repayment of the debt. They are characterized by the possibility that the Bank may sustain some loss if the deficiencies giving rise to the substandard classification are not corrected. The magnitude of the impact of these factors on the qualitative assessment of the allowance for loan loss changes from quarter to quarter. The loan review program is designed to identify and monitor problem loans by maintaining a credit grading process, requiring that timely and appropriate changes be made to reviewed loans and coordinating the delivery of the information necessary to assess the appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses. Loans are evaluated for impaired status when: (i) payments on the loan are delayed, typically by 90 days or more (unless the loan is both well secured and in the process of collection), (ii) the loan becomes classified, (iii) the loan is being reviewed in the normal course of the loan review scope, or (iv) the loan is identified by the servicing officer as a problem. In connection with the Bank Transactions, the Bank acquired loans both with and without evidence of credit quality deterioration since origination. PCI loans are accounted for in pools as well as on an individual loan basis. Cash flows expected to be collected are recast quarterly for each loan or pool. These evaluations require the continued use and updating of key assumptions and estimates such as default rates, loss severity given default and prepayment speed assumptions (similar to those used for the initial fair value estimate). Management judgment must be applied in developing these assumptions. If expected cash flows for a loan or pool decreases, an increase in the allowance for loan losses is made through a charge to the provision for loan losses. If expected cash flows for a loan or pool increase, any previously established allowance for loan losses is reversed and any remaining difference increases the accretable yield. This increase in accretable yield is taken into income over the remaining life of the loan. Loans without evidence of credit impairment at acquisition are subsequently evaluated for any required allowance at each reporting date. An allowance for loan losses is calculated using a methodology similar to that described above for originated loans. The allowance as determined for each loan collateral type is compared to the remaining fair value discount for that loan collateral type. If greater, the excess is recognized as an addition to the allowance through a provision for loan losses. If less than the discount, no additional allowance is recorded. Charge-offs and losses first reduce any remaining fair value discount for the loan and once the discount is depleted, losses are applied against the allowance established for that loan. The allowance for loan losses is subject to regulatory examinations and determinations as to adequacy, which may take into account such factors as the methodology used to calculate the allowance and the size of the allowance. While the Company believes it has an appropriate allowance for the existing loan portfolio at December 31, 2018, additional provisions for losses on existing loans may be necessary in the future. During 2016, the Bank discovered irregularities in connection with a single loan that was in default. As a result, the Bank increased its provision for loan losses and recorded a $24.5 million charge-off during the second quarter of 2016, representing the entire outstanding principal balance of the loan. During the second quarter of 2017, the Bank recorded other noninterest income of $15.0 million from coverage provided by an insurance policy for forgery of a document delivered in connection with this loan. Changes in the allowance for loan losses, distributed by portfolio segment, are shown below (in thousands). Balance, Provision (recovery) Loans Recoveries on Balance, Year Ended December 31, 2018 beginning of year for loan losses charged off charged of loans end of year Commercial real estate $ 27,232 $ 668 $ (800) $ — $ 27,100 Commercial and industrial 23,698 6,750 (12,741) 4,273 21,980 Construction and land development 7,847 (1,792) — 6 6,061 1-4 family residential 4,245 (292) (143) 146 3,956 Mortgage warehouse — — — — — Consumer 311 (15) (93) 64 267 Broker-dealer 353 (231) — — 122 Total $ 63,686 $ 5,088 $ (13,777) $ 4,489 $ 59,486 Balance, Provision (recovery) Loans Recoveries on Balance, Year Ended December 31, 2017 beginning of year for loan losses charged off charged of loans end of year Commercial real estate $ 22,262 $ 4,320 $ (193) $ 24 $ 26,413 Commercial and industrial 21,369 6,725 (6,253) 1,833 23,674 Construction and land development 7,002 848 (13) 7 7,844 1-4 family residential 2,974 (701) (112) 201 2,362 Mortgage warehouse — — — — — Consumer 424 16 (208) 79 311 Broker-dealer 155 198 — — 353 Covered 413 2,865 (571) 22 2,729 Total $ 54,599 $ 14,271 $ (7,350) $ 2,166 $ 63,686 Balance, Provision (recovery) Loans Recoveries on Balance, Year Ended December 31, 2016 beginning of year for loan losses charged off charged of loans end of year Commercial real estate $ 15,669 $ 7,785 $ (1,243) $ 51 $ 22,262 Commercial and industrial 19,845 33,369 (33,776) 1,931 21,369 Construction and land development 6,064 938 — — 7,002 1-4 family residential 3,314 (488) (196) 344 2,974 Mortgage warehouse — — — — — Consumer 314 190 (203) 123 424 Broker-dealer 209 (53) (1) — 155 Covered 1,532 (1,121) (119) 121 413 Total $ 46,947 $ 40,620 $ (35,538) $ 2,570 $ 54,599 The loan portfolio was distributed by portfolio segment and impairment methodology as shown below (in thousands). Loans individually Loans collectively evaluated for evaluated for PCI December 31, 2018 impairment impairment loans Total Commercial real estate $ 3,909 $ 2,908,498 $ 27,713 $ 2,940,120 Commercial and industrial 10,741 1,491,151 6,559 1,508,451 Construction and land development 3,241 929,204 464 932,909 1-4 family residential — 620,936 58,327 679,263 Mortgage warehouse — 243,806 — 243,806 Consumer — 47,537 9 47,546 Broker-dealer — 578,363 — 578,363 Total $ 17,891 $ 6,819,495 $ 93,072 $ 6,930,458 Loans individually Loans collectively evaluated for evaluated for PCI December 31, 2017 impairment impairment loans Total Commercial real estate $ 13,782 $ 2,543,226 $ 25,159 $ 2,582,167 Commercial and industrial 16,819 1,328,500 6,099 1,351,418 Construction and land development 611 960,556 1,438 962,605 1-4 family residential — 424,976 4,381 429,357 Mortgage warehouse — 329,787 — 329,787 Consumer — 40,319 127 40,446 Broker-dealer — 577,889 — 577,889 Covered — 95,016 87,113 182,129 Total $ 31,212 $ 6,300,269 $ 124,317 $ 6,455,798 The allowance for loan losses was distributed by portfolio segment and impairment methodology as shown below (in thousands). Loans individually Loans collectively evaluated for evaluated for PCI December 31, 2018 impairment impairment loans Total Commercial real estate $ — $ 25,671 $ 1,429 $ 27,100 Commercial and industrial 721 21,187 72 21,980 Construction and land development 31 5,938 92 6,061 1-4 family residential — 2,657 1,299 3,956 Mortgage warehouse — — — — Consumer — 267 — 267 Broker-dealer — 122 — 122 Total $ 752 $ 55,842 $ 2,892 $ 59,486 Loans individually Loans collectively evaluated for evaluated for PCI December 31, 2017 impairment impairment loans Total Commercial real estate $ 932 $ 24,089 $ 1,392 $ 26,413 Commercial and industrial 365 23,220 89 23,674 Construction and land development 93 7,536 215 7,844 1-4 family residential — 2,038 324 2,362 Mortgage warehouse — — — — Consumer — 293 18 311 Broker-dealer — 353 — 353 Covered — 32 2,697 2,729 Total $ 1,390 $ 57,561 $ 4,735 $ 63,686 |