Loans Held for Investment and Allowance for Loan Losses | 5. Loans Held for Investment and Allowance for Loan Losses The Bank originates loans to customers primarily in Texas. Although the Bank has diversified loan and leasing portfolios and, generally, holds collateral against amounts advanced to customers, its debtors’ ability to honor their contracts is substantially dependent upon the general economic conditions of the region and of the industries in which its debtors operate, which consist primarily of agribusiness, construction, energy, real estate and wholesale/retail trade. The Hilltop Broker-Dealers make loans to customers and correspondents through transactions originated by both employees and independent retail representatives throughout the United States. The Hilltop Broker-Dealers control risk by requiring customers to maintain collateral in compliance with various regulatory and internal guidelines, which may vary based upon market conditions. Securities owned by customers and held as collateral for loans are not included in the consolidated financial statements. As previously discussed, the loans acquired in the FNB Transaction were subject to loss-share agreements with the FDIC. On October 17, 2018, the Bank and the FDIC entered into a Termination Agreement pursuant to which all rights and obligations of the Bank and the FDIC under the FDIC loss-share agreements were resolved and terminated. Accordingly, loans which were previously referred to as either “covered loans” if covered by the loss-share agreements or otherwise “non-covered loans” are now collectively referred to as “loans held for investment.” Loans that were previously covered by the FDIC loss-share agreements are included in the “covered” portfolio segment. The majority of the loans previously covered by the FDIC loss-share agreements are comprised primarily of commercial real estate and 1-4 family residential loans. Loans held for investment summarized by portfolio segment are as follows (in thousands). December 31, 2019 2018 Commercial real estate $ 3,000,523 $ 2,940,120 Commercial and industrial 2,025,720 1,752,257 Construction and land development 940,564 932,909 1-4 family residential 791,020 679,263 Consumer 47,046 47,546 Broker-dealer (1) 576,527 578,363 7,381,400 6,930,458 Allowance for loan losses (61,136) (59,486) Total loans held for investment, net of allowance $ 7,320,264 $ 6,870,972 (1) Primarily represents margin loans to customers and correspondents associated with broker-dealer segment operations. The Bank has lending policies in place with the goal of establishing an asset portfolio that will provide a return on stockholders’ equity sufficient to maintain capital to assets ratios that meet or exceed established regulations. Loans are underwritten with careful consideration of the borrower’s financial condition, the specific purpose of the loan, the primary sources of repayment and any collateral pledged to secure the loan. Underwriting procedures address financial components based on the size and complexity of the credit. The financial components include, but are not limited to, current and projected cash flows, shock analysis and/or stress testing, and trends in appropriate balance sheet and statement of operations ratios. The Bank’s loan policy provides specific underwriting guidelines by portfolio segment, including commercial and industrial, real estate, construction and land development, and consumer loans. The guidelines for each individual portfolio segment set forth permissible and impermissible loan types. With respect to each loan type, the guidelines within the Bank’s loan policy provide minimum requirements for the underwriting factors listed above. The Bank’s underwriting procedures also include an analysis of any collateral and guarantor. Collateral analysis includes a complete description of the collateral, as well as determined values, monitoring requirements, loan to value ratios, concentration risk, appraisal requirements and other information relevant to the collateral being pledged. Guarantor analysis includes liquidity and cash flow evaluation based on the significance with which the guarantors are expected to serve as secondary repayment sources. The Bank maintains a loan review department that reviews credit risk in response to both external and internal factors that potentially impact the performance of either individual loans or the overall loan portfolio. The loan review process reviews the creditworthiness of borrowers and determines compliance with the loan policy. The loan review process complements and reinforces the risk identification and assessment decisions made by lenders and credit personnel. Results of these reviews are presented to management and the Bank’s board of directors. In connection with the Bank Transactions, the Company acquired loans both with and without evidence of credit quality deterioration since origination. The following table presents the carrying amounts and the outstanding balances of PCI loans (in thousands). December 31, 2019 2018 Carrying amount $ 82,331 $ 93,072 Outstanding balance 141,615 172,808 Changes in the accretable yield for PCI loans were as follows (in thousands). Year Ended December 31, 2019 2018 2017 Balance, beginning of year $ 80,693 $ 98,846 $ 156,847 Additions — 340 — Reclassifications from nonaccretable difference, net (1) 18,353 26,166 12,946 Disposals of loans (1,168) (1,226) (1,663) Accretion (31,875) (43,433) (69,284) Transfer of loans to OREO (2) — — — Balance, end of year $ 66,003 $ 80,693 $ 98,846 (1) Reclassifications from nonaccretable difference are primarily due to net increases in expected cash flows in the quarterly recasts. Reclassifications to nonaccretable difference occur when accruing loans are moved to non-accrual and expected cash flows are no longer predictable and the accretable yield is eliminated. (2) Transfer of loans to OREO is the difference between the value removed from the pool and the expected cash flows for the loan. The remaining nonaccretable difference for PCI loans was $49.5 million and $64.2 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. During 2019, 2018 and 2017, a combination of factors affecting the inputs to the Bank’s quarterly recast process led to the reclassifications from nonaccretable difference to accretable yield. These transfers resulted from revised cash flows that reflect better-than-expected performance of the PCI loan portfolio acquired in the FNB Transaction as a result of the Bank’s strategic decision to dedicate resources to the liquidation of those loans acquired in the FNB Transaction during the noted periods. Impaired loans exhibit a clear indication that the borrower’s cash flow may not be sufficient to meet principal and interest payments, which is generally when a loan is 90 days past due unless the asset is both well secured and in the process of collection. Impaired loans include non-accrual loans, troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”), PCI loans and partially charged-off loans. The amounts shown in following tables include loans accounted for on an individual basis, as well as acquired Pooled Loans. For Pooled Loans, the recorded investment with allowance and the related allowance consider impairment measured at the pool level. Impaired loans, segregated between those considered to be PCI loans and those without credit impairment at acquisition, are summarized by portfolio segment in the following tables (in thousands). Unpaid Recorded Recorded Total Contractual Investment with Investment with Recorded Related December 31, 2019 Principal Balance No Allowance Allowance Investment Allowance PCI Commercial real estate: Non-owner occupied $ 28,541 $ 4,254 $ 8,592 $ 12,846 $ 2,659 Owner occupied 27,020 2,816 9,920 12,736 1,235 Commercial and industrial 23,281 4,131 1,129 5,260 70 Construction and land development 7,327 1 76 77 27 1-4 family residential 89,800 381 51,031 51,412 3,179 Consumer 1,695 — — — — Broker-dealer — — — — — 177,664 11,583 70,748 82,331 7,170 Non-PCI Commercial real estate: Non-owner occupied 3,895 2,790 — 2,790 — Owner occupied 4,706 3,495 — 3,495 — Commercial and industrial 27,168 10,714 2,986 13,700 1,442 Construction and land development 1,483 1,316 — 1,316 — 1-4 family residential 10,320 7,343 — 7,343 — Consumer 38 26 — 26 — Broker-dealer — — — — — 47,610 25,684 2,986 28,670 1,442 $ 225,274 $ 37,267 $ 73,734 $ 111,001 $ 8,612 Unpaid Recorded Recorded Total Contractual Investment with Investment with Recorded Related December 31, 2018 Principal Balance No Allowance Allowance Investment Allowance PCI Commercial real estate: Non-owner occupied $ 42,668 $ 5,549 $ 7,540 $ 13,089 $ 1,125 Owner occupied 36,246 11,657 2,967 14,624 304 Commercial and industrial 27,403 5,491 1,068 6,559 72 Construction and land development 10,992 74 390 464 92 1-4 family residential 106,503 646 57,681 58,327 1,299 Consumer 2,185 9 — 9 — Broker-dealer — — — — — 225,997 23,426 69,646 93,072 2,892 Non-PCI Commercial real estate: Non-owner occupied — — — — — Owner occupied 5,231 4,098 — 4,098 — Commercial and industrial 22,277 9,891 1,740 11,631 721 Construction and land development 3,430 2,711 535 3,246 31 1-4 family residential 8,695 6,922 — 6,922 — Consumer 149 42 — 42 — Broker-dealer — — — — — 39,782 23,664 2,275 25,939 752 $ 265,779 $ 47,090 $ 71,921 $ 119,011 $ 3,644 Average investment in impaired loans is summarized by portfolio segment in the following table (in thousands). Year Ended December 31, 2019 2018 2017 Commercial real estate: Non-owner occupied $ 14,363 $ 14,533 $ 16,623 Owner occupied 17,477 21,262 25,307 Commercial and industrial 18,575 21,143 19,189 Construction and land development 2,552 2,880 3,136 1-4 family residential 62,002 35,404 5,797 Consumer 39 117 361 Broker-dealer — — — Covered — 46,248 115,085 $ 115,008 $ 141,587 $ 185,498 Non-accrual loans, excluding those classified as held for sale, are summarized by portfolio segment in the following table (in thousands). December 31, 2019 2018 Commercial real estate: Non-owner occupied $ 3,813 $ 1,226 Owner occupied 3,495 4,098 Commercial and industrial 15,262 14,870 Construction and land development 1,316 3,278 1-4 family residential 7,382 7,026 Consumer 26 41 Broker-dealer — — $ 31,294 $ 30,539 At December 31, 2019 and 2018, non-accrual loans included PCI loans of $3.8 million and $4.9 million, respectively, for which discount accretion has been suspended because the extent and timing of cash flows from these PCI loans can no longer be reasonably estimated. In addition to the non-accrual loans in the table above, $4.8 million and $3.4 million of real estate loans secured by residential properties and classified as held for sale were in non-accrual status at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Interest income, including recoveries and cash payments, recorded on impaired loans was $1.6 million, $1.4 million and $1.7 million during 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Except as noted above, PCI loans are considered to be performing due to the application of the accretion method. The Bank classifies loan modifications as TDRs when it concludes that it has both granted a concession to a debtor and that the debtor is experiencing financial difficulties. Loan modifications are typically structured to create affordable payments for the debtor and can be achieved in a variety of ways. The Bank modifies loans by reducing interest rates and/or lengthening loan amortization schedules. The Bank may also reconfigure a single loan into two or more loans (“A/B Note”). The typical A/B Note restructure results in a “bad” loan which is charged off and a “good” loan or loans, the terms of which comply with the Bank’s customary underwriting policies. The debt charged off on the “bad” loan is not forgiven to the debtor. There were no TDRs granted during 2018. Information regarding TDRs granted during 2019 and 2017 is shown in the following table (dollars in thousands). At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Bank had nominal unadvanced commitments to borrowers whose loans have been restructured in TDRs. Year Ended December 31, 2019 Year Ended December 31, 2017 Number of Balance at Balance at Number of Balance at Balance at Loans Extension End of Period Loans Extension End of Period Commercial real estate: Non-owner occupied — $ — $ — — $ — $ — Owner occupied — — — 2 4,775 4,629 Commercial and industrial 4 9,618 8,566 1 1,357 1,186 Construction and land development — — — 1 655 611 1-4 family residential — — — — — — Consumer — — — — — — Broker-dealer — — — — — — Covered — — — — — — 4 $ 9,618 $ 8,566 4 $ 6,787 $ 6,426 All of the loan modifications included in the table above involved payment term extensions. The Bank did not grant principal reductions on any restructured loans during 2019, 2018 or 2017. There were no TDRs granted during the twelve months preceding December 31, 2019 or 2018 for which a payment was at least 30 days past due. The following table presents information regarding TDRs granted during the twelve months preceding December 31, 2017, for which a payment was at least 30 days past due (dollars in thousands). Twelve Months Preceding December 31, 2017 Number of Balance at Balance at Loans Extension End of Period Commercial real estate: Non-owner occupied — $ — $ — Owner occupied 1 1,481 1,352 Commercial and industrial — — — Construction and land development 1 655 611 1-4 family residential — — — Consumer — — — Broker-dealer — — — Covered — — — 2 $ 2,136 $ 1,963 An analysis of the aging of the Company’s loan portfolio is shown in the following tables (in thousands). Accruing Loans Loans Past Due Loans Past Due Loans Past Due Total Current PCI Total Past Due December 31, 2019 30-59 Days 60-89 Days 90 Days or More Past Due Loans Loans Loans Loans 90 Days or More Commercial real estate: Non-owner occupied $ 1,769 $ — $ 2,790 $ 4,559 $ 1,691,947 $ 12,846 $ 1,709,352 $ — Owner occupied 1,741 125 2,432 4,298 1,274,137 12,736 1,291,171 — Commercial and industrial 5,672 1,735 3,192 10,599 2,009,861 5,260 2,025,720 3 Construction and land development 7,580 1,827 — 9,407 931,080 77 940,564 — 1-4 family residential 6,281 1,461 2,739 10,481 729,127 51,412 791,020 — Consumer 455 34 — 489 46,557 — 47,046 — Broker-dealer — — — — 576,527 — 576,527 — $ 23,498 $ 5,182 $ 11,153 $ 39,833 $ 7,259,236 $ 82,331 $ 7,381,400 $ 3 Accruing Loans Loans Past Due Loans Past Due Loans Past Due Total Current PCI Total Past Due December 31, 2018 30-59 Days 60-89 Days 90 Days or More Past Due Loans Loans Loans Loans 90 Days or More Commercial real estate: Non-owner occupied $ 1,174 $ 199 $ — $ 1,373 $ 1,708,160 $ 13,089 $ 1,722,622 $ — Owner occupied 1,364 — 4,173 5,537 1,197,337 14,624 1,217,498 75 Commercial and industrial 1,792 1,049 11,051 13,892 1,731,806 6,559 1,752,257 3 Construction and land development 3,549 — — 3,549 928,896 464 932,909 — 1-4 family residential 5,987 2,484 1,950 10,421 610,515 58,327 679,263 — Consumer 254 147 — 401 47,136 9 47,546 — Broker-dealer — — — — 578,363 — 578,363 — $ 14,120 $ 3,879 $ 17,174 $ 35,173 $ 6,802,213 $ 93,072 $ 6,930,458 $ 78 In addition to the loans shown in the table above, PrimeLending had $102.7 million and $83.1 million of loans included in loans held for sale (with an aggregate unpaid principal balance of $104.0 million and $84.0 million, respectively) that were 90 days past due and accruing interest at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. These loans are guaranteed by U.S. government agencies and include loans that are subject to repurchase, or have been repurchased, by PrimeLending. Management tracks credit quality trends on a quarterly basis related to: (i) past due levels, (ii) non-performing asset levels, (iii) classified loan levels, (iv) net charge-offs, and (v) general economic conditions in state and local markets. The Company utilizes a risk grading matrix to assign a risk grade to each of the loans in its portfolio with the exception of broker-dealer loans. A risk rating is assigned based on an assessment of the borrower’s management, collateral position, financial capacity, and economic factors. The general characteristics of the various risk grades are described below. Pass — Special Mention — Substandard — PCI — The following tables present the internal risk grades of loans, as previously described, in the portfolio by class (in thousands). December 31, 2019 Pass Special Mention Substandard PCI Total Commercial real estate: Non-owner occupied $ 1,638,682 $ — $ 57,824 $ 12,846 $ 1,709,352 Owner occupied 1,238,855 810 38,770 12,736 1,291,171 Commercial and industrial 1,917,450 15,973 87,037 5,260 2,025,720 Construction and land development 937,967 — 2,520 77 940,564 1-4 family residential 722,657 — 16,951 51,412 791,020 Consumer 46,758 — 288 — 47,046 Broker-dealer 576,527 — — — 576,527 $ 7,078,896 $ 16,783 $ 203,390 $ 82,331 $ 7,381,400 December 31, 2018 Pass Special Mention Substandard PCI Total Commercial real estate: Non-owner occupied $ 1,673,424 $ — $ 36,109 $ 13,089 $ 1,722,622 Owner occupied 1,175,225 2,083 25,566 14,624 1,217,498 Commercial and industrial 1,677,033 15,320 53,345 6,559 1,752,257 Construction and land development 929,130 — 3,315 464 932,909 1-4 family residential 601,264 393 19,279 58,327 679,263 Consumer 47,416 — 121 9 47,546 Broker-dealer 578,363 — — — 578,363 $ 6,681,855 $ 17,796 $ 137,735 $ 93,072 $ 6,930,458 Allowance for Loan Losses It is management’s responsibility to, at the end of each quarter, or more frequently as deemed necessary, analyze the level of the allowance for loan losses to ensure that it is appropriate for the estimated credit losses in the portfolio. Estimated credit losses are the probable current amount of loans that the Company will be unable to collect given facts and circumstances as of the evaluation date. When management determines that a loan, or portion thereof is uncollectible, the loan, or portion thereof, is charged-off against the allowance for loan losses, or for acquired loans accounted for in pools, charged against either the pool discount or the post-acquisition allowance. Recoveries on charge-offs of loans acquired in the Bank Transactions that occurred prior to their acquisition represent contractual cash flows not expected to be collected and are recorded as accretion income. Recoveries on acquired loans charged-off subsequent to their acquisition are credited to the allowance for loan loss, except for recoveries on loans accounted for in pools, which are credited to the pool discount. The Company has developed a methodology that seeks to determine an allowance within the scope of the Receivables and Contingencies Topics of the ASC. Each of the loans that has been determined to be impaired is within the scope of the Receivables Topic. Impaired loans that are equal to or greater than $0.5 million are individually evaluated using one of three impairment measurement methods as of the evaluation date: (1) the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective rate, (2) the loan’s observable market price, or (3) the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Specific reserves are provided in the estimate of the allowance based on the measurement of impairment under these three methods, except for collateral dependent loans, which require the fair value method. All non-impaired loans are within the scope of the Contingencies Topic. Estimates of loss for the Contingencies Topic are calculated based on historical loss, adjusted for qualitative or environmental factors. The Bank uses a rolling three year average net loss rate to calculate historical loss factors. The analysis is conducted by call report loan category, and further disaggregates commercial and industrial loans by collateral type. The analysis uses net charge-off experience by considering charge-offs and recoveries in determining the loss rate. The historical loss calculation for the quarter is calculated by dividing the current quarter net charge-offs for each loan category by the quarter ended loan category balance. The Bank utilizes a weighted average loss rate to better represent recent trends. While historical loss experience provides a reasonable starting point for the analysis, historical losses are not the sole basis upon which the Company determines the appropriate level for the allowance for loan losses. Management considers recent qualitative or environmental factors that are likely to cause estimated credit losses associated with the existing portfolio to differ from historical loss experience, including but not limited to: ● the loss emergence period is applied to both the general allowance and adjustments for qualitative risk factors, which represents the average amount of time between when loss events occur for specific loan types and when such problem loans are identified and the related loss amounts are confirmed through charge-offs; ● changes in the volume and severity of past due, non-accrual and classified loans; ● ● ● ● ● ● Changes in the volume and severity of past due, non-accrual and classified loans, as well as changes in the nature, volume and terms of loans in the portfolio are key indicators of changes that could indicate a necessary adjustment to the historical loss factors. Classified loans are defined as loans having a well-defined weakness or weaknesses related to the borrower's financial capacity or to pledged collateral that may jeopardize the repayment of the debt. They are characterized by the possibility that the Bank may sustain some loss if the deficiencies giving rise to the substandard classification are not corrected. The magnitude of the impact of these factors on the qualitative assessment of the allowance for loan loss changes from quarter to quarter. Periodically, management conducts an analysis to estimate the loss emergence period for each loan portfolio segment based on historical charge-offs, loan type and loan payment history and considers available industry peer bank data. Model output by loan category is reviewed to evaluate the reasonableness of the reserve levels in comparison to the estimated loss emergence period applied to historical loss experience. The loan review program is designed to identify and monitor problem loans by maintaining a credit grading process, requiring that timely and appropriate changes be made to reviewed loans and coordinating the delivery of the information necessary to assess the appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses. Loans are evaluated for impaired status when: (i) payments on the loan are delayed, typically by 90 days or more (unless the loan is both well secured and in the process of collection), (ii) the loan becomes classified, (iii) the loan is being reviewed in the normal course of the loan review scope, or (iv) the loan is identified by the servicing officer as a problem. In connection with the Bank Transactions, the Bank acquired loans both with and without evidence of credit quality deterioration since origination. PCI loans are accounted for in pools as well as on an individual loan basis. Cash flows expected to be collected are recast quarterly for each loan or pool. These evaluations require the continued use and updating of key assumptions and estimates such as default rates, loss severity given default and prepayment speed assumptions (similar to those used for the initial fair value estimate). Management judgment must be applied in developing these assumptions. If expected cash flows for a loan or pool decreases, an increase in the allowance for loan losses is made through a charge to the provision for loan losses. If expected cash flows for a loan or pool increase, any previously established allowance for loan losses is reversed and any remaining difference increases the accretable yield. This increase in accretable yield is taken into income over the remaining life of the loan. Loans without evidence of credit impairment at acquisition are subsequently evaluated for any required allowance at each reporting date. An allowance for loan losses is calculated using a methodology similar to that described above for originated loans. The allowance as determined for each loan collateral type is compared to the remaining fair value discount for that loan collateral type. If greater, the excess is recognized as an addition to the allowance through a provision for loan losses. If less than the discount, no additional allowance is recorded. Charge-offs and losses first reduce any remaining fair value discount for the loan and once the discount is depleted, losses are applied against the allowance established for that loan. The allowance for loan losses is subject to regulatory examinations and determinations as to adequacy, which may take into account such factors as the methodology used to calculate the allowance and the size of the allowance. While the Company believes it has an appropriate allowance for the existing loan portfolio at December 31, 2019, additional provisions for losses on existing loans may be necessary in the future. Changes in the allowance for loan losses, distributed by portfolio segment, are shown below (in thousands). Balance, Provision (Recovery) Loans Recoveries on Balance, Year Ended December 31, 2019 Beginning of Year for Loan Losses Charged Off Charged Off Loans End of Year Commercial real estate $ 27,100 $ 5,649 $ (1,160) $ 6 $ 31,595 Commercial and industrial 21,980 (921) (5,924) 2,829 17,964 Construction and land development 6,061 (1,183) — — 4,878 1-4 family residential 3,956 3,276 (907) 61 6,386 Consumer 267 459 (498) 37 265 Broker-dealer 122 (74) — — 48 Total $ 59,486 $ 7,206 $ (8,489) $ 2,933 $ 61,136 Balance, Provision (Recovery) Loans Recoveries on Balance, Year Ended December 31, 2018 Beginning of Year for Loan Losses Charged Off Charged Off Loans End of Year Commercial real estate $ 27,232 $ 668 $ (800) $ — $ 27,100 Commercial and industrial 23,698 6,750 (12,741) 4,273 21,980 Construction and land development 7,847 (1,792) — 6 6,061 1-4 family residential 4,245 (292) (143) 146 3,956 Consumer 311 (15) (93) 64 267 Broker-dealer 353 (231) — — 122 Covered — — — — — Total $ 63,686 $ 5,088 $ (13,777) $ 4,489 $ 59,486 Balance, Provision (Recovery) Loans Recoveries on Balance, Year Ended December 31, 2017 Beginning of Year for Loan Losses Charged Off Charged Off Loans End of Year Commercial real estate $ 22,262 $ 4,320 $ (193) $ 24 $ 26,413 Commercial and industrial 21,369 6,725 (6,253) 1,833 23,674 Construction and land development 7,002 848 (13) 7 7,844 1-4 family residential 2,974 (701) (112) 201 2,362 Consumer 424 16 (208) 79 311 Broker-dealer 155 198 — — 353 Covered 413 2,865 (571) 22 2,729 Total $ 54,599 $ 14,271 $ (7,350) $ 2,166 $ 63,686 The loan portfolio was distributed by portfolio segment and impairment methodology as shown below (in thousands). Loans Individually Loans Collectively Evaluated for Evaluated for PCI December 31, 2019 Impairment Impairment Loans Total Commercial real estate $ 5,698 $ 2,969,243 $ 25,582 $ 3,000,523 Commercial and industrial 12,889 2,007,571 5,260 2,025,720 Construction and land development 1,237 939,250 77 940,564 1-4 family residential 608 739,000 51,412 791,020 Consumer — 47,046 — 47,046 Broker-dealer — 576,527 — 576,527 Total $ 20,432 $ 7,278,637 $ 82,331 $ 7,381,400 Loans Individually Loans Collectively Evaluated for Evaluated for PCI December 31, 2018 Impairment Impairment Loans Total Commercial real estate $ 3,909 $ 2,908,498 $ 27,713 $ 2,940,120 Commercial and industrial 10,741 1,734,957 6,559 1,752,257 Construction and land development 3,241 929,204 464 932,909 1-4 family residential — 620,936 58,327 679,263 Consumer — 47,537 9 47,546 Broker-dealer — 578,363 — 578,363 Total $ 17,891 $ 6,819,495 $ 93,072 $ 6,930,458 The allowance for loan losses was distributed by portfolio segment and impairment methodology as shown below (in thousands). Loans Individually Loans Collectively Evaluated for Evaluated for PCI December 31, 2019 Impairment Impairment Loans Total Commercial real estate $ — $ 27,701 $ 3,894 $ 31,595 Commercial and industrial 1,442 16,452 70 17,964 Construction and land development — 4,851 27 4,878 1-4 family residential — 3,207 3,179 6,386 Consumer — 265 — 265 Broker-dealer — 48 — 48 Total $ 1,442 $ 52,524 $ 7,170 $ 61,136 Loans Individually Loans Collectively Evaluated for Evaluated for PCI December 31, 2018 Impairment Impairment Loans Total Commercial real estate $ — $ 25,671 $ 1,429 $ 27,100 Commercial and industrial 721 21,187 72 21,980 Construction and land development 31 5,938 92 6,061 1-4 family residential — 2,657 1,299 3,956 Consumer — 267 — 267 Broker-dealer — 122 — 122 Total $ 752 $ 55,842 $ 2,892 $ 59,486 |