UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 20-F
(Mark One)
| | |
o | | REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR 12(g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
OR
| | |
þ | | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010
OR
| | |
o | | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
OR
| | |
o | | SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| | |
| | Date of event requiring this shell company report |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 000-50596
LINKTONE LTD.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
N/A
(Translation of Registrant’s name into English)
Cayman Islands
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
Unit C-D, 10F Long Life Building
1566 West Yan An Road
Shanghai 200052, People’s Republic of China
(Address of principal executive offices)
Peck Joo Tan
Unit C-D, 10F Long Life Building
1566 West Yan An Road
Shanghai 200052, People’s Republic of China
Phone: 86-21-6167; Fax: 86-21-6167-1740
Email: pjtan@mncgroup.com
(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.
Name of each exchange and Title of each class on which registered:
American Depositary Shares, each representing 10 ordinary shares, par value US$0.0001 per share,
NASDAQ Global Market
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act.
NONE
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act.
NONE
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report: 420,756,430 ordinary shares, par value US$0.0001 per share.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yeso Noþ
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or (15)(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yeso Noþ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesþ Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yeso Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
| | | | |
|
Large Accelerated Filero | | Accelerated Filero | | Non-Accelerated Filerþ |
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:
| | | | |
|
U.S. GAAPþ | | International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Boardo | | Othero |
If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.
Item 17o Item 18o
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yeso Noþ
INTRODUCTION
This annual report on Form 20-F includes our audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2009 and 2010 and for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010.
Forward-Looking Information
This annual report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements are made under the “safe harbor” provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You can identify these forward-looking statements by terminology such as “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “future,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “seek,” “estimate” and similar statements. The accuracy of these statements may be impacted by a number of business risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or anticipated, including but not limited to those risks and uncertainties identified under Item 3.D. “Risk Factors.”
All forward-looking statements in this annual report are made as of the date of filing hereof, based on information available to us as of that date, and we assume no obligation to update or revise any of these forward-looking statements even if experience or future changes show that the indicated results or events will not be realized.
PART I
| | |
Item 1. | | Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers |
Not Applicable.
| | |
Item 2. | | Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable |
Not Applicable.
A. Selected Financial Data
The following table presents the selected consolidated financial information for our business. You should read the following information in conjunction with Item 5 “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.” The following data as of December 31, 2009 and 2010 and for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 has been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements for those years and should be read in conjunction with those statements, which are included in this annual report beginning on page F-1. The following data as of December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008 and for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007 has also been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements for those years, which are not included in this annual report. Our audited financial statements for the foregoing periods were prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles, or U.S. GAAP.
3
All amounts below are in U.S. dollars, except for share number data.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the year ended December 31, | |
| | 2006(1) | | | 2007(1) | | | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2010 | |
| | $ | | | $ | | | $ | | | $ | | | $ | |
Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross revenue from non-related parties | | | 79,507,654 | | | | 49,714,795 | | | | 67,025,802 | | | | 61,516,694 | | | | 69,878,417 | |
Gross revenue from related parties | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 700,000 | | | | 1,829,608 | |
Sales tax | | | (3,280,012 | ) | | | (1,751,517 | ) | | | (2,520,119 | ) | | | (2,303,289 | ) | | | (2,087,121 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net revenue | | | 76,227,642 | | | | 47,963,278 | | | | 64,505,683 | | | | 59,913,405 | | | | 69,620,904 | |
Cost of revenue | | | (28,654,437 | ) | | | (20,377,795 | ) | | | (33,837,630 | ) | | | (38,941,272 | ) | | | (47,137,394 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross profit | | | 47,573,205 | | | | 27,585,483 | | | | 30,668,053 | | | | 20,972,133 | | | | 22,483,510 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Product development | | | (7,372,074 | ) | | | (5,506,938 | ) | | | (3,177,071 | ) | | | (3,316,507 | ) | | | (2,811,783 | ) |
Selling and marketing | | | (22,592,886 | ) | | | (13,787,153 | ) | | | (13,130,513 | ) | | | (9,318,469 | ) | | | (8,377,743 | ) |
General and administrative | | | (11,789,984 | ) | | | (11,762,028 | ) | | | (9,901,474 | ) | | | (8,220,999 | ) | | | (12,325,334 | ) |
Provision for impairment | | | — | | | | (5,142,396 | ) | | | — | | | | (2,068,127 | ) | | | (1,102,265 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total operating expenses | | | (41,754,944 | ) | | | (36,198,515 | ) | | | (26,209,058 | ) | | | (22,924,102 | ) | | | (24,617,125 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations | | | 5,818,261 | | | | (8,613,032 | ) | | | 4,458,995 | | | | (1,951,969 | ) | | | (2,133,615 | ) |
Interest income, net of financial expenses (2) | | | 1,589,180 | | | | 1,111,337 | | | | 1,728,654 | | | | 1,614,575 | | | | 2,278,593 | |
Other income, net of other expenses | | | 862,830 | | | | 467,690 | | | | 384,553 | | | | 431,005 | | | | 701,884 | |
Other-than-temporary impairment loss on investments | | | — | | | | — | | | | (1,476,937 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
Income tax expense | | | (1,267,183 | ) | | | (433,657 | ) | | | (786,057 | ) | | | (579,270 | ) | | | (1,439,261 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) from continuing operations | | | 7,003,088 | | | | (7,467,662 | ) | | | 4,309,208 | | | | (485,659 | ) | | | (592,399 | ) |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | | | (155,902 | ) | | | (8,936,340 | ) | | | (20,807,008 | ) | | | 596,551 | | | | 315,256 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | | 6,847,186 | | | | (16,404,002 | ) | | | (16,497,800 | ) | | | 110,892 | | | | (277,143 | ) |
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest | | | (54,595 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (301,582 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) attributable to the shareholders of the Company | | | 6,792,591 | | | | (16,404,002 | ) | | | (16,497,800 | ) | | | 110,892 | | | | (578,725 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings (loss) per share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Continuing operations | | | 0.03 | | | | (0.03 | ) | | | 0.01 | | | | (0.00 | ) | | | (0.00 | ) |
Discontinued operations | | | (0.00 | ) | | | (0.04 | ) | | | (0.05 | ) | | | 0.00 | | | | 0.00 | |
Total net income (loss) | | | 0.03 | | | | (0.07 | ) | | | (0.04 | ) | | | 0.00 | | | | (0.00 | ) |
Diluted: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Continuing operations | | | 0.03 | | | | (0.03 | ) | | | 0.01 | | | | (0.00 | ) | | | (0.00 | ) |
Discontinued operations | | | (0.00 | ) | | | (0.04 | ) | | | (0.05 | ) | | | 0.00 | | | | 0.00 | |
Total net income (loss) | | | 0.03 | | | | (0.07 | ) | | | (0.04 | ) | | | 0.00 | | | | (0.00 | ) |
Weighted-average number of ordinary shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | 253,850,193 | | | | 239,499,334 | | | | 374,285,807 | | | | 420,677,724 | | | | 420,980,146 | |
Diluted | | | 259,529,531 | | | | 239,499,334 | | | | 374,847,328 | | | | 420,677,724 | | | | 420,980,146 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Statements of Cash Flows Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating activities of continuing operations | | | 15,280,775 | | | | 4,592,626 | | | | 7,970,372 | | | | 546,684 | | | | 1,237,562 | |
Operating activities of discontinued operations | | | (1,157,443 | ) | | | (14,779,630 | ) | | | (10,799,804 | ) | | | 4,395,367 | | | | — | |
Investing activities of continuing operations | | | 25,929,895 | | | | (3,042,125 | ) | | | (12,887,561 | ) | | | (6,480,967 | ) | | | (25,686,289 | ) |
Investing activities of discontinued operations | | | (5,110,031 | ) | | | (566,181 | ) | | | (16,210 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
Financing activities of continuing operations | | | (20,670,822 | ) | | | 25,847 | | | | 57,359,539 | | | | (438,160 | ) | | | 3,188,321 | |
4
| | |
(1) | | The statements of operations and comprehensive income data for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007 have been adjusted to show the financial results of our advertising business (which included various cross-media advertising arrangements as described in Item 4.B. “Information on the Company — Business Overview — Cross-Media Advertising Business”) as discontinued operations. That business segment started in the fourth quarter of 2006 and was terminated in the third quarter of 2008. |
|
(2) | | Interest income includes $64,773, $325,080 and $85,594 from related parties for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, | |
| | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2010 | |
| | $ | | | $ | | | $ | | | $ | | | $ | |
Balance Sheet Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | | | 51,445,086 | | | | 39,646,522 | | | | 81,593,823 | | | | 79,477,153 | | | | 59,449,183 | |
Short-term investments | | | 1,012,230 | | | | 2,315,334 | | | | 14,372,646 | | | | 19,702,747 | | | | 33,809,913 | |
Accounts receivable, net | | | 12,371,700 | | | | 10,164,756 | | | | 15,245,030 | | | | 11,838,597 | | | | 15,491,479 | |
Due from related parties | | | — | | | | — | | | | 7,984,450 | | | | 10,812,178 | | | | 2,398,114 | |
Tax refund, other receivables and other current assets | | | 5,618,676 | | | | 14,644,396 | | | | 7,827,173 | | | | 5,488,297 | | | | 10,605,859 | |
Inventories | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,304,716 | |
Property and equipment, net and non-current assets held for sale | | | 2,852,735 | | | | 2,258,814 | | | | 1,031,543 | | | | 530,769 | | | | 12,615,968 | |
Goodwill, intangible assets and other long-term assets | | | 24,848,843 | | | | 21,315,116 | | | | 15,348,053 | | | | 12,577,791 | | | | 54,601,488 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | | 98,149,270 | | | | 90,344,938 | | | | 143,402,718 | | | | 140,427,532 | | | | 191,276,720 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 9,000,427 | | | | 13,551,129 | | | | 15,192,667 | | | | 11,536,511 | | | | 37,569,112 | |
Non-controlling interests | | | — | | | | 108,066 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 21,623,084 | |
Total Linktone Ltd. shareholders’ equity | | | 89,148,843 | | | | 76,685,743 | | | | 128,210,051 | | | | 128,891,021 | | | | 132,084,524 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | | | 98,149,270 | | | | 90,344,938 | | | | 143,402,718 | | | | 140,427,532 | | | | 191,276,720 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Exchange Rate Information
Our business is currently primarily conducted in and from China, Singapore and Indonesia in their respective currencies — Renminbi (RMB), Singapore dollar (SGD) and Indonesian rupiah (IDR). In this annual report, all references to Renminbi or RMB, Singapore dollar or SGD and rupiah or IDR are to the legal currencies of China, Singapore and Indonesia, respectively, and all references to U.S. dollars, dollars, $ and US$ are to the legal currency of the United States. The conversion of RMB, SGD and IDR into U.S. dollars in this annual report are based on the middle rate between buying and selling as published by the People’s Bank of China of the People’s Republic of China, or PRC, the Development Bank of Singapore and Bank Indonesia, respectively. For reader convenience, this annual report contains translations of (1) some Renminbi to U.S. dollar amounts at US$1.00 : RMB6.6227, (2) some Singapore dollar to U.S. dollar amounts at US$1.00: SGD1.2834 and (3) some rupiah to U.S. dollar amounts at US$1.00: IDR 8,991, all of which were the middle rates for the respective currencies on December 31, 2010. The published middle rate on June 13, 2011 was US$1.00 : RMB6.4892, US$1.00: SGD1.2356 and US$1.00: IDR8,531. We make no representation that any Renminbi, Singapore dollar, rupiah or U.S. dollar amounts could have been, or could be, converted into U.S. dollars or such currencies, as the case may be, at any particular rate, the rates stated below, or at all. The Chinese government imposes control over its foreign currency reserves in part through direct regulation of the conversion of Renminbi into foreign exchange and through restrictions on foreign trade.
5
The following table sets forth the average middle rates for Renminbi expressed as per one U.S. dollar for the years 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010, as well as the middle rates for Singapore dollars and Indonesian rupiah as per one U.S. dollar for the relevant periods in 2010:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Average (1) | | RMB | | | SGD | | | IDR | |
2006 | | | 7.9579 | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | |
2007 | | | 7.6040 | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | |
2008 | | | 6.9451 | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | |
2009 | | | 6.8310 | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | |
2010 | | | 6.7695 | | | | 1.3434 | (2) | | | 8,966 | (3) |
| | |
(1) | | Determined by averaging the middle rate between buying and selling rates on the last business day of each month during the relevant period. |
|
(2) | | From April 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010 as we acquired our initial 50% interest in our Singapore-based subsidiary, InnoForm Media Pte. Ltd. in late March 2010. |
|
(3) | | From September 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010 as we acquired our 51% interest in our Indonesian-based subsidiary, PT Linktone Indonesia in early September 2010. |
The following table sets forth the high and low middle rates for the Renminbi, Singapore dollar and Indonesian rupiah expressed as per one U.S. dollar during the past six months.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | RMB | | | SGD | | | IDR | |
Month Ended | | High | | | Low | | | High | | | Low | | | High | | | Low | |
December 31, 2010 | | | 6.6786 | | | | 6.6227 | | | | 1.3177 | | | | 1.2834 | | | | 9,095 | | | | 8,933 | |
January 31, 2011 | | | 6.6349 | | | | 6.5883 | | | | 1.2987 | | | | 1.2793 | | | | 9,133 | | | | 8,931 | |
February 28, 2011 | | | 6.5985 | | | | 6.5752 | | | | 1.2816 | | | | 1.2713 | | | | 9,087 | | | | 8,801 | |
March 31, 20101 | | | 6.5748 | | | | 6.5564 | | | | 1.2821 | | | | 1.2602 | | | | 8,868 | | | | 8,664 | |
April 30, 2011 | | | 6.5527 | | | | 6.4990 | | | | 1.2606 | | | | 1.2241 | | | | 8,742 | | | | 8,531 | |
May 31, 2011 | | | 6.5108 | | | | 6.4845 | | | | 1.2503 | | | | 1.2234 | | | | 8,620 | | | | 8,491 | |
B. Capitalization and Indebtedness
Not Applicable.
C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds
Not Applicable.
D. Risk Factors
RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS IN CHINA
Risks Related to Our Contractual Relationships with the Mobile and Fixed Line Operators in China
We depend on the principal mobile and fixed line telecommunication network operators in China for delivery of our China-based telecom value-added services, and the termination or alteration of our various contracts with any of them or their provincial or local affiliates could materially and adversely impact our business.
We offer all of our China-based telecom value-added services to users through three principal mobile phone and fixed line network operators in China, China Mobile Communications Corporation, or China Mobile, China United Telecommunications Corporation, or China Unicom, and China Telecom Group, or China Telecom, which service substantially all of China’s approximately 842 million mobile phone subscribers at the end of December 2010 (prior to the restructuring of the Chinese telecommunication industry in 2008, we also offered our services through the network operated by China Netcom Corp., or China Netcom). As of December 2010, China Mobile had approximately 584 million mobile subscribers, or 69.4% of the mobile phone service market in China, China Unicom had approximately 167 million mobile subscribers, or 19.8% of the mobile phone service market in China, and China Telecom had approximately 91 million mobile subscribers, or the remaining 10.8% of the mobile phone service market in China. Given their dominant market position, our negotiating leverage with China Mobile, China Unicom and China Telecom (referred to as the operators in this annual report) is limited. If our various contracts with any of the operators are terminated or adversely altered, it may be impossible to find appropriate replacement operators with the requisite licenses and permits, infrastructure and customer base to offer our services, and our business would be significantly impaired. For 2008, 2009 and 2010, we derived approximately 73.1%, 74.4% and 52.4%, respectively, of our total revenue from China Mobile and are, therefore, particularly dependent on that operator.
6
Our services are provided pursuant to contracts that we have with the national offices of the operators, as well as several of their provincial and local affiliates. Each of these contracts is non-exclusive, and has a limited term (generally one or two years). We usually renew these contracts or enter into new ones when the prior contracts expire, but on occasion the renewal or new contract can be delayed by periods of one month or more. The terms of these contracts vary, but the operators are generally entitled to terminate them in advance for a variety of reasons or, in some cases, for unspecified reasons at their discretion. For example, several of our contracts with the operators can be terminated if:
| • | | we fail to achieve performance standards which are established by the applicable operator from time to time, |
|
| • | | we breach our obligations under the contracts, which include, in many cases, the obligation not to deliver content that violates the operator’s policies and applicable law, and exclusivity provisions prohibiting us from offering services which are the same as the services we provide to any other telecommunications service providers, |
|
| • | | the operator receives high levels of customer complaints about our services, or |
|
| • | | the operator sends us written notice that it wishes to terminate the contract at the end of the applicable notice period. |
Changes in the policies and procedures of the operators and in their enforcement of their policies and procedures have resulted in our company having to pay additional charges to the operators and have negatively affected our revenue. Further changes could materially and adversely impact our revenue, profitability and financial condition in the future.
The operators have a wide range of policies and procedures regarding customer service, quality control and other aspects of the telecom value-added services industry. As the industry has evolved over the last several years, the operators have refined these policies and procedures to improve overall service quality. In addition, the operators have unilaterally changed the way such policies and procedures have been enforced as applied to third party service providers such as ourselves, and may do so again in the future. We often only become aware of such policy or procedural changes when the operators inform us orally or provide us with a monthly statement indicating an additional charge, which in either case can happen months after the originating cause or issues arose. Because of this time delay, we cannot always confirm the existence of such issues or conform our systems in a timely manner.
In response to policy directives from China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, or MIIT (prior to the PRC government restructuring in March 2008, its predecessor, the Ministry of Information Industry), China Mobile, China Unicom and China Telecom introduced significant changes to their operating policies in each of the last four years. For example, in 2008, in order to improve its oversight of service providers, China Mobile started to rank short messaging services, or SMS, and interactive voice response (known as “IVR”) service providers based on certain performance criteria, and those service providers that fall into a lower rank are subject to restrictions in service fees they may charge. These policy changes by the operators negatively affected our revenue and profitability from 2G, 2.5G and audio-related services in 2008, 2009 and 2010.
7
Moreover, in response to measures taken by MIIT, in November 2009 China Mobile, China Unicom and China Telecom implemented a series of measures targeting to eliminate offensive or unauthorized content, including pornographic content, on Wireless Application Protocol (referred to as WAP in this annual report) sites in China, and suspended the ability of all of their third party WAP service providers, including our company, to charge for services, including services that do not contain offensive or unauthorized content. This suspension is still effective. Furthermore, in 2010 China Mobile, China Unicom and China Telecom implemented additional measures in order to further improve user experience for mobile handset embedded services, including requiring additional notices to, and confirmations by, users before purchasing wireless value-added services that are embedded in mobile handsets. The operators also began requiring SMS short codes, which are special telephone numbers shorter than full telephone numbers that are widely used for ordering value-added services and other activities such as voting in television program contests, to be more tailored to the specific service offering or service partner (previously, a single SMS short code could be used for multiple service offerings or partners). We do not expect the measure on WAP services to materially adversely impact our revenue and profitability given that our revenue from WAP services has not been significant, but the measures on mobile handset embedded services and SMS short codes negatively affected our revenue and profitability from data-related services in 2010. Moreover, subsequent changes to the operators’ procedures starting in March 2010 caused our revenue from IVR services to significantly decline.
Because the operators’ policies and procedures may be subject to further changes and they are highly sensitive to customer feedback, we cannot be certain that our business activities will always be deemed in compliance with those policies and procedures, despite our efforts to so comply. Accordingly, we may be subject to additional monetary penalties or service suspensions or both, even for conduct which we believed to be permissible. We are also required to devote increasing resources to maintain communications and relationships with the operators to prevent, or in some cases minimize the impact of restrictions on our activities imposed by the operators. Our relationships with the operators could be adversely affected in the long-term if we are perceived to be providing poor quality services or weak customer service. Any non-compliance with the operators’ policies and procedures by us, whether inadvertent or not, could result in a material and adverse effect on our revenue, profitability and financial condition.
Our business has been adversely affected and will continue to be adversely affected if the operators continue to expand their own portfolio of telecom value-added services that compete with our services.
The principal mobile operators in China, as well as in Indonesia, have been continuously increasing their offerings of telecom value-added services, such as personal information management, instant messaging, mobile news, location-based services, mobile commerce and other entertainment and informational services. We believe that mobile operators in our markets are focusing on greater adoption of telecom value-added services as their dependency on such revenue rises. The operators’ offerings directly compete with our services, and the wide variety of services that mobile operators offer may make it increasingly difficult for us to compete effectively.
Our business has been affected by this trend and will be adversely affected further if any of the operators decides to further increase its own offerings of telecom value-added services to users of mobile and wireless devices. Moreover, we could be partially or fully denied access to their networks as the operators expand their service offerings.
8
We depend on the operators to maintain accurate records and to pay us for services we provide.
We depend on the operators to maintain accurate records of the fees paid by users and to pay us for services we provide. Specifically, the operators provide us with monthly statements that do not provide itemized information regarding which of our services are being paid for. As a result, monthly statements that we have received from the operators cannot be reconciled in detail to our own internal records for the reasons discussed below under “— Because the operators do not supply us with revenue and transmission information on a service-by-service basis, we can only estimate our actual gross revenue and our cost of revenue by service type, and as a result, which of our services are or may be profitable, all of which make it difficult to analyze the factors affecting our financial performance.” In addition, we have only limited means to independently verify the information provided to us in this regard because we do not have access to the operators’ internal records. Our business and results of operations could be adversely affected if the operators miscalculate the revenue generated from our services and our portion of that revenue or if there is any miscommunication between us and the mobile operators regarding our revenue earned.
Our revenue and cost of revenue are affected by billing and transmission failures which are often beyond our control.
We do not collect fees for our services from the operators in a number of circumstances, including if:
| • | | the delivery of our service to a customer is prevented because his or her phone is turned off for an extended period of time, the customer’s prepaid phone card has run out of value or the customer has ceased to be a customer of the applicable operator, |
|
| • | | the operator experiences technical problems with its network that prevent the delivery of our services to the customer, |
|
| • | | we experience technical problems with our technology platform that prevent delivery of our services, or |
|
| • | | the customer refuses to pay for our service due to quality or other problems. |
These situations are known in the industry as billing and transmission failures, and we do not recognize or receive any revenue for services which are characterized as billing and transmission failures by the operators. Billing and transmission failures can significantly affect our revenue. We are also required to pay some of our content and distribution channel providers a percentage of the revenue earned from the operators with respect to services incorporating the content providers’ products or distributed through their channels. In calculating the fees payable to these providers, we make estimates to take into account certain potential adjustments made by the operators which may have been applicable to the services incorporating the providers’ products, and reduce the fees payable by us accordingly. Nonetheless, as estimates involve making assumptions which may prove inaccurate, we have in the past paid, and may continue to pay, such providers fees which are disproportionate to what we have been paid for the relevant service.
9
Because the operators do not supply us with revenue and transmission information on a service-by-service basis, we can only estimate our actual gross revenue and our cost of revenue by service type, and as a result, which of our services are or may be profitable, all of which make it difficult to analyze the factors affecting our financial performance.
The operators provide us with separate monthly statements for our SMS, 2.5G and audio-related services. However, the monthly statements of the operators with respect to each such service category do not contain revenue and billing and transmission failure information on a specific service-by-service basis. Although we maintain our own records reporting the services provided, we can only estimate our actual gross revenue and cost of revenue by service type because we are unable to confirm which services were transmitted but resulted in billing and transmission failures. As a result, we are not able to definitively calculate and monitor service-by-service revenue, margins and other financial information, such as average revenue per user by service and total revenue per user by service, and also cannot definitively determine which of our services are or may be profitable.
The operators charge us if their customers default in payment of our service fees and may also impose higher service or network fees on us if we are unable to satisfy customer usage and other performance criteria.
Fees for our telecom value-added services are charged on a monthly subscription or per use basis. Based on our contractual arrangements, we rely on the operators for both billing of, and collection from, phone users of fees for our services.
China Mobile generally charges us a service fee of 13.0% to 30.0% of the revenue generated by our services. China Unicom and China Telecom have implemented a sliding scale system whereby the percentage of gross revenue received by the service provider can range from 43.0% to 80.0% and 51.0% to 85.0%, respectively, depending on customer usage, revenue and other performance criteria. In 2010, we received on average 83.0%, 75.0% and 53.0%, respectively, of the gross revenue from China Mobile, China Unicom and China Telecom. Moreover, to the extent that the number of messages sent by us over each operator’s network in most provinces, exceeds the number of messages our customers send to us, we must pay per message network fees, which decrease in several provinces as the volume of customer usage of our services increases. The number of messages sent by us will exceed those sent by our users, for example, if a user sends us a single message to order a game but we in turn must send that user several messages to confirm his or her order and deliver the game itself. We cannot be certain that we will be able to satisfy these criteria in the future or that the operators will keep the criteria at their current levels.
In 2007, the operators, through most of their provincial and local offices, began to charge us services fees and network fees even if a customer defaults in payment to the operators for our services. Our gross margins have been reduced as a result of these charges, and any future increase in the operator’s network fees and service charges will likely reduce our gross margins further.
The operators may not authorize our services to be offered on their networks or restrict the service fees we may charge if we fail to achieve minimum customer usage, revenue and other criteria.
Our business could be adversely affected if we fail to achieve minimum customer usage, revenue and other criteria imposed or revised by the operators at their discretion from time to time. The operators, through their provincial and local offices, have historically preferred to work only with a small group of the best performing telecom value-added service providers, based upon the uniqueness of the service offered by each provider, total number of users, usage and revenue generated in the applicable province or municipality, the rate of customer complaints, and marketing expenditures in the applicable province or municipality. If we fail to meet the then current performance criteria that the operators set from time to time, our services could be excluded from their networks at a provincial, municipal or national level, or we could be precluded from introducing new services or services with higher fees, which would adversely affect our revenue and growth prospects.
10
In April and June 2008, China Mobile started to implement a quarterly credit and ranking of its SMS and IVR service providers, respectively, based on certain performance criteria, and those service providers that fall into a lower rank are subject to restrictions in service fees they may charge in the following quarters until their ranking improves. China Mobile may extend such ranking systems to other services in the future.
During 2008, 2009 and 2010, some of the telecom value-added services offered by our affiliated entities received lower ranks for certain quarters which reduced our revenue in those periods. If the services offered by our affiliated entities fail to achieve a satisfactory ranking in the future, the service fees we may charge for these services may be restricted, which would adversely affect our revenue and profit margin.
The services we offer and the prices we charge are subject to approval by the operators, and if requested approvals are not granted in a timely manner, our business could be adversely affected.
We must obtain approval from the operators with respect to each service that we propose to offer to their customers and the pricing for such service. In addition, any changes in the pricing of our existing services must be approved in advance by these operators. There can be no assurance that such approvals will be granted in a timely manner or at all. Moreover, under all of our contracts with China Mobile and most of our contracts with China Unicom and China Telecom, we cannot change prices more than once every six months or charge prices outside of a fixed range. Failure to obtain, or a delay in obtaining, such approvals could place us at a competitive disadvantage in the market and adversely affect our business. In addition, the operators’ more rigorous enforcement of their customer service policies in recent years may result in stricter scrutiny by the operators of our proposed services and pricing, which may in turn delay the approval process or result in disapproval of such proposed services or pricing.
We recognize a portion of our revenue for our services through the use of estimates of monthly revenue to the extent we are unable to obtain actual figures from the operators before we finalize our financial statements. To the extent our estimates differ from actual figures reported by the operators, this could require us to make adjustments to our financial statements and cause delay in the announcement of our quarterly earnings.
We recognize a portion of our revenue based on estimates of monthly revenue based on our internal records for the month and monthly confirmation rates with the operators in prior months if we are unable to obtain actual figures from the operators before we finalize our financial statements. Actual revenue may differ from prior estimates when unexpected variations in billing and transmission failures occur. To the extent our estimates differ from actual figures reported by the operators, this could potentially require us to later make adjustments to our financial statements if the operators’ billing statements and cash payments are different from our estimates, which could adversely affect our reputation and the price of our American Depositary Shares, or ADSs.
To minimize the amount of gross revenue which we recognize based on such estimates, we will typically delay announcing our quarterly and year-end financial results until we have received substantially all of the monthly confirmations from the operators. For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, 2.4%, 1.0% and 1.6%, respectively, of our gross revenue was based on such estimates. However, this approach requires us to announce our financial results after a relatively extended period following each period-end which could create uncertainty in the market for our ADSs and adversely affect their price.
11
We face intense competition in China.
The Chinese market for telecom value-added services is intensely competitive, and is changing rapidly. We compete principally with three groups of telecom value-added service providers in China:
| • | | dedicated service providers similar to Linktone whose business focus is to offer a variety of telecom content directly to mobile and fixed-line phone users, |
|
| • | | the national internet portal operators in China, which offer internet access and content aggregation services on a nationwide basis in addition to telecom services, and |
|
| • | | niche service providers, which focus primarily on a particular market segment or application that often builds on a pre-existing sector competency. |
In addition, we also face growing competition from China Mobile, China Unicom and China Telecom as they increase their offerings of telecom value-added services.
We have faced competition from service providers in the three groups described above since our entry into this market. We may also face significant competition from other parties, including the operators and companies which offer online services and are expanding to various degrees into telecom value-added services, such as Shanda Interactive Entertainment Limited, which acquired a controlling stake in, and subsequently acquired the assets of, one of our competitors, Hurray! Holding Co., Ltd., in 2009, and Focus Media Holding Limited, which primarily focus on internet-based games and media services, respectively, but have also begun to offer wireless games and services. Moreover, entry barriers are relatively low for new competitors in the telecom value-added services market, particularly for 2G services, and as a result, there is an ever increasing number of competitors in the marketplace.
A substantial portion of our revenue is derived from the relatively wealthier coastal and southern provinces in China, and the termination or alteration of our contracts with the operators or a general economic downturn in those areas could have a particularly adverse effect on our business.
Per capita income levels and mobile phone penetration rates (i.e., the number of mobile subscribers divided by the population of China) in China are generally higher in the coastal and southern provinces, such as Guangdong, Jiangsu, Liaoning, and Zhejiang provinces, as well as the municipalities of Shanghai and Beijing, which are among our top revenue generating locales.
Some of our contracts are with the operators’ parent companies and are nationwide, while other contracts are with the respective affiliates of the operators in various provinces and municipalities. As noted above, there are numerous, often highly-subjective bases on which the operators have the right to terminate our contracts with them. Moreover, some of our nationwide contracts or contracts with affiliates of China Mobile for Guangdong, Jiangsu, Liaoning and Zhejiang provinces and the municipalities of Shanghai and Beijing can be terminated at the discretion of either contracting party upon 15 to 30 days notice, depending on the contract. If these contracts are terminated or adversely altered or there is a general economic downturn in those areas, our business could be adversely affected. We cannot predict whether there will be a termination of our contracts with affiliates of the operators in significant provinces in the future.
12
RISKS RELATED TO OUR OPERATIONS OUTSIDE OF CHINA
We may face increasing risks relating to conducting business internationally.
Although to date we have generated the major portion of our revenue within the PRC, we are in the process of implementing our long-term strategy to enter other markets in Asia to expand our geographic coverage and our range of product and service offerings. For example, in 2009, we recorded revenue of $0.7 million from providing telecom value-added services, or VAS, and related market and technical services in Indonesia to PT Infokom Elektrindo (“Infokom”), an affiliate of PT Media Nusantara Citra Tbk (“MNC”), our controlling shareholder. MNC, its subsidiaries and affiliates are hereinafter collectively referred to as MNC Group.
Subsequently in June 2010, we purchased a mandatory convertible bond, or MCB, issued by PT Inti Idaman Nusantara (“IDN”), which has been renamed PT Linktone Indonesia (“PT Linktone”), from Starlight Ltd (“Starlight”), a United Arab Emirates company, for a total consideration of $13.2 million. In September 2010, we converted the bond into new shares of PT Linktone representing 51% of its outstanding share capital (the remaining 49% interest in PT Linktone is owned by MNC Group), and we now conduct all of our VAS activities in Indonesia through PT Linktone. We had revenue of $1.8 million from PT Linktone’s provision of VAS in Indonesia in 2010. The purpose of the acquisition was in line with our expansion strategy in the region.
We are also continuously looking for other opportunities to leverage the extensive media resources and relationships with content providers of MNC Group. As part of this initiative, we and MNC (through its wholly owned subsidiary, MNC International Middle East Limited, or MIMEL) acquired 50% and 25% of the share capital of InnoForm Media Pte. Ltd., or InnoForm, in March 2010, respectively. In June 2010, we subscribed for additional new shares of InnoForm and as a result of which we and MNC (through MIMEL) hold 75% and 12.5% of the equity interest of InnoForm, respectively. MNC (through MIMEL) also has the option to purchase the remaining 12.5% of outstanding share capital of InnoForm, whereby 7.5% and 5% of the share capital can be purchased within 18 months and 30 months, respectively, of the agreement date. InnoForm is a Singapore-based company with regional offices in Malaysia and Hong Kong, specializing in the development, distribution and licensing of edutainment and entertainment products.
We have very limited experience, however, operating in markets outside of China and in managing non-VAS businesses. These initiatives may cause us to become increasingly subject to various risks relating to conducting business abroad, including:
| • | | political and economic instability in countries where we offer our products and services; |
|
| • | | different user preferences and usage habits with respect to telecom value-added and other services, and consumption of video, audio and print content in other markets; |
|
| • | | different or changing policies and procedures of operators; |
|
| • | | legal or regulatory restrictions; |
|
| • | | potentially negative consequences from changes in tax laws; |
|
| • | | fluctuations in currency exchange rates; |
|
| • | | difficulty in staffing and managing widespread operations; |
|
| • | | differing protection of intellectual property; and |
|
| • | | difficulties in collecting accounts receivable because of distance and different legal rules. |
Our future growth and profitability may be materially and adversely affected if we cannot adequately manage these and any other risks which arise in connection with our international expansion. We may also be subject to impairment charges if the value of any of our overseas investments declines, as discussed in the foregoing risk factor.
13
With respect to our entertainment and edutainment distribution business operated by our subsidiary InnoForm, such business faces significant competition from other video distributors operating in Southeast Asia such as Scorpio East Holdings Pte Ltd and Berjaya HVN (S) Pte Ltd, as well as a number of smaller low cost distributors. Many of InnoForm’s competitors have established relationships with major content producers, such as Hollywood movie studios, and such producers are often reluctant to change distributors, which could limit InnoForm’s future growth. InnoForm’s sales are also materially adversely affected by an overall increase in the downloading of video content illegally posted on the internet and competition from movie theaters and other forms of entertainment and education.
Several of our competitors have longer operating histories, greater name and brand recognition, larger customer bases and databases, significantly greater financial, technological and marketing resources and superior access to original content than we have. As a result, our existing or potential competitors may in the future achieve greater market acceptance and gain additional market share, which in turn could reduce our revenue.
We face intense competition in Indonesia.
Similar to the PRC VAS market, the Indonesian market for VAS is fiercely competitive. There are over 200 service providers in Indonesia, many of whom are expanding their content and have a more established brand and market position in comparison to our company. Some of our competitors offer telecom value-added services which are similar to our portfolio of services, while others focus on particular categories of services. We focus on launching 3G services and leveraging the broad range of content provided by the MNC Group, but we cannot be certain that such services and content will be appealing to customers. In addition, while we believe that the number of users of VAS, in particular for mobile games and ringback tones, have been increasing rapidly in Indonesia, certain types of services such as SMS subscriptions and mobile quiz contests have experienced slower growth in recent periods as the markets for such services mature. Moreover, a number of internet and web portal operators offer similar content for free in Indonesia. To compete against such providers, we are working with mobile application developers to create applications that contain our content menu, which enables customers to simply click the items that they want and we will charge them for the content. Such applications can be downloaded by a customer into his or her mobile handset, or we can embed them into mobile handsets by cooperating with handset principals or distributors. We share our revenue with the application developers, which tends to lower our margins for the services we sell in Indonesia.
We rely on MNC and its affiliate to operate our VAS business in Indonesia, and the termination or alteration of our arrangements with them, including our use of their short codes, could materially adversely affect our business and results of operation.
We provide our VAS in Indonesia though agreements with MNC and its affiliate Infokom, who in turn have cooperative agreements with the Indonesian telecom operators. We have no direct contracts with such operators and are dependent on MNC and Infokom to keep their contracts with the operators in effect and to remit revenue provided by the operators for our services to our subsidiary PT Linktone. In addition, we rely on MNC and Infokom for short codes which are numerical codes (shorter than telephone numbers) assigned by the telecom operators and used to order VAS and take other actions such as voting in television program contests. MNC assigns one short code owned by it to us free of charge, while Infokom leases three short codes to us in exchange for a fee equal to 10% of the revenues generated through such short codes, net of the telecom operators’ fees. If the MNC Group does not maintain its contractual arrangements with the telecom operators in Indonesia or decides to stop providing short codes to us or charge increased fees for such codes, we may be unable to enter into such contracts directly with the operators or to obtain new short codes from alternate sources. In any such case, our business and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.
Our expansion into the entertainment and edutainment products distribution market through our acquisition of InnoForm may not be successful.
InnoForm primarily sells VCDs, DVDs, Blu-ray discs and video-on-demand, including movies, television programs and educational videos, to consumers in Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, Hong Kong and Vietnam. Its operating results have varied significantly in the past, and may vary significantly in the future due to a number of factors that could have an adverse impact on the business. Thus, the operational and financial results of this acquisition may differ from our expectations.
14
In particular, commencing in mid-2010, overall sales of entertainment and edutainment products in InnoForm’s markets have declined which has adversely affected the revenue of InnoForm and other industry participants. This decline has resulted from a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control, including a proliferation of illegal free-to-download quality video websites and increasing penetration of high-speed broadband in major cities, particularly in Singapore. As a result, we expect that viewers will consume more video content online. Other factors which have adversely affected InnoForm’s business and results of operations include:
| • | | high rental rates in Southeast Asian cities which has caused many retailers to decrease the number of outlets they operate, |
| • | | the availability of parallel-imported video products from lower-cost countries such as China, Malaysia and Indonesia, |
| • | | consistent with the industry trend worldwide, relatively slow sales of Blu-ray discs, |
| • | | a reluctance among many major content producers to change their distributors which limits InnoForm’s ability to increase market share, |
| • | | increasing competition from online portals and movie theaters, and |
| • | | increasing costs to acquire desirable content. |
In addition, InnoForm also obtains all of its entertainment and edutainment content from third parties, and its cost of acquiring such content has been increasing in recent years which has, and may continue to, negatively impact its profitability and liquidity.
We are focusing on broadening InnoForm’s distribution network to include new media digital platforms which will allow customers to consume video content via online and wireless devices. We can provide no assurance that these efforts will be successful or that they will generate sufficient sales to offset the ongoing decline in sales of physical discs. We cannot be certain that, if we are able to launch our online video services, such services will be able to compete with other websites which offer online video content, particularly those which offer content in violation of copyright protections and may allow downloads for free or at significantly lower prices than we can charge.
Additional Risks Related to Our Company
The VAS industry in China and Indonesia is rapidly evolving, which may make it difficult for investors to evaluate our business.
We began commercially offering telecom value-added services in China in 2000 while PT Linktone, previously known as IDN, began offering telecom value-added services in Indonesia in 2009. Over the last several years, the technologies and services used in the telecom value-added services industry in these markets have developed rapidly. As a result of this rapid and continual change in the industry, you should consider our prospects in light of the risks and difficulties frequently encountered by companies in an early stage of development. These risks include our ability to:
| • | | attract and retain users for our telecom value-added services, especially for our 2.5G and audio-related services, and mobile online games which have increased in 2010 following our acquisition of a 50.01% interest in Letang Game Limited, or Letang, a private Chinese company specializing in the development of mobile games and PC games, in January 2010, |
|
| • | | expand the content and services that we offer and, in particular, develop and aggregate innovative new content and service offerings, and sources of revenue which are not dependent on the operators, |
|
| • | | procure effective distribution channels to promote our services, |
|
| • | | respond effectively to rapidly evolving competitive and market dynamics and address the effects of mergers and acquisitions among our competitors, |
|
| • | | maintain, expand and enhance our relationships with international media companies and other strategic partners and to generate meaningful returns from such partnerships, and |
|
| • | | increase awareness of our brand and user loyalty. |
15
Due to these factors, there can be no certainty that we will maintain or increase our current share of the highly competitive market in which we operate.
The success of some of our telecom value-added services is significantly dependent on our ability to obtain, customize and localize desirable content and technology from third parties and distribute our services effectively.
We are increasingly obtaining much of our telecom value-added services content, including wireless games, logos, music, news and other content such as popular radio or television programs, from third parties. Furthermore, we expect that we will license technology in connection with our development of next generation services. As the market for telecom value-added services develops, content and technology providers and distribution channel providers have increased their profits from these distribution and localization arrangements by demanding a greater share of revenue or other fees, which has adversely affected our financial performance, including adversely affecting our revenue and gross margin in 2010.
Many of our arrangements with content and technology providers as well as distribution channel providers are non-exclusive, short-term and subject to renewal. If our competitors are able to provide or distribute such content in a similar or superior manner or to license the same technologies, it could adversely affect the popularity of our services and our negotiating leverage with third party providers. In addition, lack of effective distribution channels has adversely affected our revenue from 2.5G services in 2009 and 2010.
In addition, we must often invest significant resources in customizing and localizing the content and applications we license or purchase for the Chinese telecom market or we are authorized to use. This may include work ranging from translating the content or application interface into Chinese to performing significant development work to utilize the particular content or application.
If we fail to establish and maintain economically attractive relationships with content, technology and distribution channel providers or to thereafter successfully customize and localize any third party content or technology, we may not be able to attract and retain users or maintain or improve our financial performance.
Our acquisitions or ventures with strategic partners may have an adverse effect on our ability to manage our business.
We have made acquisitions and formed strategic alliances in the past. Some of the companies we acquired have not performed as well as we expected, and required significant further capital input and attention from our management. We also terminated or restructured certain strategic alliances. For example, we terminated our exclusive advertising arrangements with Qinghai Satellite Television, or QTV, and Tianjin Satellite Television, or TJSTV, in July and September 2008, respectively, which resulted in our incurring a net loss from discontinued operations of $20.8 million in 2008. We also recognized an impairment provision of $1.3 million in 2010 related to a loan receivable in connection with our partnership to distribute U.S. Major League Baseball content. Nevertheless, if we are presented with appropriate opportunities, we may continue to acquire businesses, technologies, services or products or enter into strategic alliances which are complementary to our core telecom value-added services business in the future, but may also present similar challenges. For example, a consolidated affiliate, Shanghai Weilan Computer Co., Ltd. (“Weilan”), acquired a controlling interest in Letang in January 2010. In addition, we and MNC (through MIMEL) acquired in the aggregate 87.5% of the share capital of InnoForm in March 2010 and June 2010, and in June 2010 we acquired mandatory convertible bonds that were converted into new shares of PT Linktone representing 51% of its outstanding share capital, as described above.
16
The requirement for significant further capital input and the diversion of our management’s attention and any difficulties encountered in any integration process could have an adverse effect on our ability to manage our business. Acquisitions or strategic alliances expose us to potential risks, including risks associated with the integration of new operations, services and personnel, ensuring effective internal controls with respect to acquired or new businesses, the extent to which acquired or new businesses give rise to unforeseen or hidden liabilities, the diversion of resources from our existing businesses and technologies, the inability to generate sufficient revenue to offset the costs and expenses of acquisitions or strategic alliances and potential loss of, or harm to, relationships with employees and content providers as a result of integration of new businesses. Given the sophisticated technologies used in the telecom value-added services industry, the successful, cost-effective integration of other businesses’ technology platforms and services into our own is also a critical, and highly complex, aspect of any acquisition or strategic alliance. If we are unable to successfully enter into and implement acquisitions or strategic alliances in future periods, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
We have incurred net losses for a significant portion of our history.
We incurred significant net losses until the first quarter of 2003 and began incurring net losses again in the first quarter of 2007 until the fourth quarter of 2008 during which time we were implementing our cross-media strategy which involved significant expenses. We also incurred a net loss for the fourth quarters of 2009 and 2010. We could incur significant net losses in the future due to changes in the market, operating environment and competitive dynamics and our ability to respond to those changes, as well as any possible new strategic initiatives launched by our company. If we do not sustain profitability, the market price of our ADSs may decline.
We have been required to record charges to earnings because the value of certain of our assets was deemed to have been impaired, and we may record such charges in future periods.
We are required by U.S. GAAP to review our receivables, short-term investments, intangible assets, goodwill and other assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable. For the year ended December 31, 2008, in addition to impairment charges for some of the assets of our discontinued operations, we recorded an other-than-temporary loss on investments of $1.5 million related to our investment in a pooled investment fund, which is included under short-term investments in our balance sheet as of December 31, 2008 contained in our consolidated financial statements in this annual report. We also recorded an impairment charge of $2.5 million in 2009 related to the goodwill for our PC game business, which was caused by a downward revision in expected future cash flow for that business resulting from market competition, and an impairment in connection with our partnership to distribute U.S. Major League Baseball content of $1.3 million in 2010, as noted above. Please refer to Item 5. “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects — Results of Operations” and “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects — Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates.” We may be required to record similar impairment charges in the future if we determine that the value of our assets is impaired.
17
Our mobile games business has a short operating history, and the mobile games market in the PRC and Indonesia is subject to many uncertainties.
We, through our affiliate Weilan, acquired a controlling interest in Letang in January 2010 in order to accelerate our presence in the mobile games market. However, our mobile games business has a short operating history, and our prior efforts to develop an in-house mobile game development team were not successful. As a result, there is limited financial data that can be used to evaluate our mobile games business and its potential to generate revenues in the future. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in developing our mobile games business, which will depend, among other things, on our ability to:
| • | | respond to market developments, including the development of new platforms and technologies, and changes in pricing and distribution models; |
| • | | maintain and diversify our distribution channels, including through China Mobile and the other telecommunications operators and handset manufacturers; |
| • | | develop new high-quality mobile games that can achieve significant market acceptance, and timely improve our existing mobile games to extend their life spans and to maintain their competitiveness in the mobile games market; |
| • | | supplement our internally developed mobile games by acquiring mobile games from third-party mobile games developers or cooperating with third-party mobile games developers to jointly develop mobile games; |
| • | | develop and upgrade our technologies; and |
| • | | execute our business and marketing strategies successfully. |
In addition, the mobile games market is an emerging market in the PRC and Indonesia. The growth of this market and the level of demand and market acceptance of our mobile games are subject to many uncertainties. The development of this market and our ability to derive revenues from this market depend on a number of factors, some of which are beyond our control, including but not limited to:
| • | | the growth rate of mobile data services in the PRC and Indonesia; |
| • | | changes in consumer demographics, tastes and preferences; |
| • | | changes in handset platform technologies and mobile games distribution channels; |
| • | | potential competition from established companies that develop and operate personal computer-based online games and may enter the mobile online games market; and |
| • | | the popularity and price of new mobile games and merchandise and premium features embedded in games that we and our competitors may launch and distribute in the future. |
Due to the uncertainties in connection with our mobile games business in particular and the mobile games market in the PRC and Indonesia generally, we cannot guarantee that our mobile games business will contribute significantly to our future revenues. Our failure to successfully develop this business could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
18
We depend on key personnel for the success of our business. Our business may be severely disrupted if we lose the services of our key executives and employees or fail to add new senior and middle managers to our management.
Our future success is heavily dependent upon the continuing service of our key executives, particularly Hary Tanoesoedibjo, our Chief Executive Officer, and Peck Joo Tan, our Chief Financial Officer. Our future success is also dependent upon our ability to attract and retain qualified senior and middle managers to our management team. If one or more of our current or future key executives and employees are unable or unwilling to continue in their present positions, we may not be able to easily replace them, and our business may be severely disrupted. For example, our revenue in the third quarter of 2009 was somewhat adversely affected by the resignations of our then current chief executive officer, chief financial officer and chief operating officer, as well as certain staff in our VAS business upon whom we relied. In addition, if any of these key executives or employees joins a competitor or forms a competing company, we could lose customers and suppliers and incur additional expenses to recruit and train personnel. We do not maintain key-man life insurance for any of our executive officers.
We also rely on a number of key technology and product development staff for the operation of our company. Given the competitive nature of our industry, the risk of key technology and product development staff leaving our company is high and could disrupt our operations.
We may need additional capital and may not be able to obtain such capital on acceptable terms. Even if we are able to obtain capital on acceptable terms, it may result in operating and financial covenants that would restrict our operations and/or additional dilution to our shareholders.
It is difficult to plan for capital requirements in our rapidly changing industry. We may need additional capital for our future acquisitions, service development, technological infrastructure and sales and marketing activities. Our ability to obtain additional capital on acceptable terms is subject to a variety of uncertainties, including:
| • | | investors’ perceptions of, and demand for, securities of telecommunications value-added services companies; |
|
| • | | conditions of the U.S. and other capital markets in which may seek to raise funds; |
|
| • | | our future results of operations, financial conditions and cash flows; |
|
| • | | governmental regulations of foreign investment in value-added telecommunications companies; |
|
| • | | economic, political and other conditions in the PRC and other countries in which we operate; and |
|
| • | | governmental policies relating to foreign currency borrowings. |
If our current sources are insufficient to satisfy our capital requirements, we may seek to obtain a credit facility or sell additional equity or debt securities. If we fail to raise additional funds on terms acceptable to us, or at all, such failure may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. For example, we may not be able to carry out parts of our future growth strategy to acquire assets, technologies and businesses that are complementary to our existing business or necessary to maintain our growth and competitiveness.
Even if we are able to obtain capital on terms acceptable to us, the incurrence of indebtedness would result in increased debt service obligations and could result in operating and financial covenants that would restrict operations. The sale of additional equity or convertible debt securities could result in additional dilution to shareholders.
19
Business growth and a rapidly changing operating environment may strain our limited resources.
We have limited operational, administrative and financial resources, which may be inadequate to sustain the growth we want to achieve. As our user base increases, we will need to increase our investment in our technology infrastructure, facilities and other areas of operations, in particular our product development, customer service and sales and marketing which are important to our future success. If we are unable to manage our growth and expansion effectively, the quality of our services and our customer support could deteriorate and our business may suffer. For example, any such performance issue could prompt the operators to cease offering our services over their networks. Our future success will depend on, among other things, our ability to:
| • | | develop and quickly introduce new services, adapt our existing services and maintain and improve the quality of all of our services, particularly as new mobile technologies such as 3G or 4G are introduced; |
|
| • | | effectively maintain our relationships with the operators and our other partners; |
|
| • | | expand the percentage of our revenue which are recurring and are derived from monthly subscription based services; |
|
| • | | develop sources of revenue which are not dependent on the operators; |
|
| • | | enter into and maintain relationships with desirable content providers; |
|
| • | | continue training, motivating and retaining our existing employees and attract and integrate new employees, including our senior management, some of whom have been with our company for less than one year; |
|
| • | | develop and improve our operational, financial, accounting and other internal systems and controls; and |
|
| • | | maintain adequate controls and procedures to ensure that our periodic public disclosure under applicable laws, including U.S. securities laws, is complete and accurate. |
Any failure of the telecommunications networks in the markets in which we operate, the internet or our technology platform may reduce use of our services.
Both the continual accessibility of the networks of the operators and the performance and reliability of the internet infrastructure in the markets in which we operate are critical to our ability to attract and retain users. Moreover, our business depends on our ability to maintain the satisfactory performance, reliability and availability of our technology platform. The servers which constitute the principal system hardware for our operations in China are located in five locations in Beijing. We maintain backup system hardware in our office in Beijing, but cannot be certain such backup will be adequate if there are problems with our primary system hardware. In Indonesia, our websites and services are made available through network servers located in Jakarta. Any server interruptions, break-downs or system failures, including failures caused by sustained power shutdowns, floods or fire causing loss or corruption of data or malfunctions of software or hardware equipment, or other events outside our control that could result in a sustained shutdown of all or a material portion of the mobile networks, the internet or our technology platform, could adversely impact our ability to provide our services to users and decrease our revenue.
If our exclusive providers of bandwidth and server custody service fail to provide these services or increase their prices, our business could be adversely affected.
We rely on affiliates of the operators to provide us with bandwidth and server custody service for our services in China pursuant to contracts which have one-year terms. If any of the operators or their respective affiliates fails to provide such services, it may be difficult, if not impossible, to find a substitute provider on a timely basis or at all. In addition, we have no control over the costs of the services provided by the operators or their respective affiliates. If any of the operators or their respective affiliates fails to provide these services or raise their prices, our business could be adversely affected.
20
We have been generating declining levels of revenue from our media advertising in China.
We sell and market our services through, among other things, media advertising. Our media advertising is typically in the form of television commercials and magazine, newspaper and website placements. Fee rates for these various media channels have become increasingly expensive while in most cases generating lower levels of gross revenue than previous years’ levels of gross revenue and thus negatively affecting our profit margin. We scaled down our spending on media advertising in 2008, 2009 and 2010 due to this declining rate of return. Our net income could continue to be negatively affected in future periods if we are not able to effectively manage advertising expenses and maximize the gross revenue we generate from such advertising. In addition, if we continue to curtail or cease our spending on media advertising in the future, we may not have other more attractive or cost-efficient methods to promote our services, which may negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our corporate structure could be deemed to be in violation of current or future Chinese laws and regulations which could adversely affect our ability to operate our business effectively or at all.
In connection with China’s entry into the World Trade Organization, or WTO, foreign investment in telecommunications and internet services in China was liberalized to allow for up to 30.0% foreign ownership in value-added telecom and internet services in 2002, 49.0% in 2003 and 50.0% thereafter. In order to meet these ownership requirements, as of December 31, 2010, we maintained control over the following affiliated Chinese entities which are each owned by our current and/or former employees and are treated as our variable interest entities, or VIEs, for accounting purposes:
(i) | | Shanghai Weilan Computer Co., Ltd., or Weilan; |
|
(ii) | | Shanghai Unilink Company Ltd., or Unilink; |
|
(iii) | | Shenzhen Yuan Hang Technology Co., Ltd., or Yuan Hang; |
|
(iv) | | Beijing Cosmos Digital Technology Co., Ltd., or Cosmos; |
|
(v) | | Hainan Zhong Tong Computer Network Co., Ltd., or Zhong Tong; |
|
(vi) | | Beijing Lian Fei Wireless Communication Technology Co., Ltd., or Lian Fei; |
|
(vii) | | Shanghai Qimingxing E-commerce Co., Ltd., or Qimingxing; |
|
(viii) | | Beijing Ojava Wireless Information Technology Co. Ltd., or Beijing Ojava; |
|
(ix) | | Zhong Qing Wei Lian Cultural Communication Co., Ltd., or Wei Lian; |
|
(x) | | Beijing Lianyu Interactive Technology Development Co., Ltd., or Lianyu; |
|
(xi) | | Shanghai Ling Yu Cultural and Communication Co., Ltd., or Ling Yu; |
|
(xii) | | Shanghai Lang Yi Advertising Co., Ltd., or Lang Yi; |
|
(xiii) | | Beijing Xian Feng Li Liang Co., Ltd., or Xian Feng; and |
|
(xiv) | | Letang. |
Under the current shareholding structure, Weilan, Unilink, Cosmos, Zhong Tong, Lian Fei, Qimingxing, Beijing Ojava and Lianyu have inter-provincial value-added telecommunication services licenses issued by MIIT, and they offer our services through one or more of the telecommunications network operators in China. Yuan Hang offers services related to our online game business. Xian Feng provides music related content services to network operators. Ling Yu, Wei Lian and Lang Yi were dormant in 2010.
21
It is possible that the relevant Chinese authorities could, at any time, assert that any portion of or all of the existing or future ownership structure and businesses of us, any of our wholly owned subsidiaries, or any of our VIEs, violate existing or future Chinese laws, regulations or policies. It is also possible that the new laws or regulations governing the telecommunication or internet sectors in China that have been adopted or may be adopted in the future will prohibit or restrict foreign investment in, or other aspects of, any of our, our wholly owned subsidiaries’ or our affiliated Chinese entities’ current or proposed businesses and operations. In addition, these new laws and regulations may be retroactively applied. For example, on September 28, 2009, the General Administration of Press and Publication (GAPP), the National Copyright Administration and the National Office of Combating Pornography and Illegal Publications jointly published the Notice Regarding the Consistent Implementation of the “Stipulations on ‘Three Provisions’ of the State Council and the Relevant Interpretations of the State Commission Office for Public Sector Reform and the Further Strengthening of the Administration of Pre-examination and Approval of Internet Games and the Examination and Approval of Imported Internet Games”, or Circular 13. Circular 13 expressly prohibits foreign investors from participating in internet game operating businesses via wholly owned, equity joint venture or cooperative joint venture investments in China, and from controlling and participating in such businesses directly or indirectly through contractual or technical support arrangements. It is not clear yet as to whether other PRC government authorities, such as the Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) and MIIT, will support GAPP to enforce the prohibition of the VIE model that Circular 13 contemplates. If our current structure and our contractual arrangements were found to be in violation of any existing or future Chinese laws and regulations, we may be required to restructure our structure and operations in China to comply with such Chinese laws. In such case, we may not be able to operate or control our business in the same manner as we currently do, and therefore, may not be able to consolidate our VIEs. In addition, the relevant regulatory authorities would have broad discretion in dealing with such violations which may adversely impact our financial statements, operations and cash flows (including the restriction on us to carry out the business). It is unclear how such restructuring could impact our business and operating results.
We believe that our present operations are structured to comply with Chinese law. However, many Chinese regulations are subject to extensive interpretive powers of governmental agencies and commissions, and there are substantial uncertainties regarding the interpretation and application of current and future Chinese laws and regulations. Accordingly, we cannot be assured that Chinese regulatory authorities will not ultimately take a contrary view to our belief and will not take action to prohibit or restrict our business activities.
We may be unable to collect long-term loans to shareholders of our affiliated Chinese entities.
As of December 31, 2010, we had provided long-term interest free loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of approximately RMB114.0 million to shareholders of our affiliated Chinese entities for the purpose of investing in our affiliated Chinese entities as registered capital and to make payments to the selling shareholders from whom we acquired certain of our affiliated Chinese entities for settlement of purchase price consideration pursuant to applicable acquisition agreements. The term of these loans in each case is 10 years. The shareholders of our affiliated Chinese entities can only repay the loans by transferring to us or our designees all of their equity interest in the respective affiliated Chinese entity. Please refer to the table under Item 5. “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects — Arrangements with Consolidated Affiliates — Loan Agreements.” We expect that we will continue to be involved in and provide additional financial support in the future to the extent allowed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and other applicable laws. Because of uncertainty associated with Chinese law, ultimate enforcement of the loan agreements is uncertain.
22
We depend upon contractual arrangements with our affiliated Chinese entities for the success of our business. These arrangements may not be as effective in providing operational control as direct ownership of these businesses and may be difficult to enforce.
Because we are restricted by the Chinese government from owning telecommunications and internet operations in China, we depend on our affiliated Chinese entities, Weilan, Unilink, Yuan Hang, Cosmos, Zhong Tong, Lian Fei, Qimingxing, Beijing Ojava, Lianyu and Xian Feng in which we have no direct ownership interest, to provide those services through contractual agreements with the operators. These arrangements may not be as effective in providing control over our operations as direct ownership of these businesses. For example, our affiliated Chinese entities could fail to take actions required to operate our business, such as entering into content development contracts with potential content suppliers or service contracts with the operators in China. Moreover, the fees for our services are paid by the operators directly to our affiliated Chinese entities, which are then obligated at our request to transfer substantially all or some of such fees to one of our wholly owned subsidiaries, Shanghai Linktone Consulting Co., Ltd., or Linktone Consulting, Shanghai Huitong Information Co., Ltd., or Huitong, Shanghai Linktone Internet Technology Co., Ltd., or Linktone Internet, Shanghai Linktone Software Co., Ltd., or Linktone Software, Wang You Digital Technology Co., Ltd., or Wang You, Beijing Ruida Internet Technology Co., Ltd., or Ruida, and Shanghai Xintong Information Technology Co., Ltd. or Xintong. If our affiliated Chinese entities fail to perform their obligations under these agreements, we may have to incur substantial costs and expend significant resources to enforce those arrangements and rely on legal remedies under Chinese laws. The Chinese laws, rules and regulations are relatively new, and because of the limited volume of published decisions and their non-binding nature, the interpretation and enforcement of these laws, rules and regulations involve substantial uncertainties. These uncertainties may impede our ability to enforce these contractual arrangements, or suffer significant delay or other obstacles in the process of enforcing these contractual arrangements and materially and adversely affect our results of operations and the financial position. For example, in the event that one of our Chinese VIEs fails to perform its obligations under our loan agreement with it, we may incur a loss on this loan or costs to enforce these arrangements.
Contractual arrangements with our affiliated Chinese entities may cause a transfer pricing adjustment and may be subject to scrutiny by the PRC tax authorities.
We could face material and adverse tax consequences if the PRC tax authorities determine that our contractual arrangements with our affiliated Chinese entities were not entered into based on arm’s length negotiations. Although our contractual arrangements are similar to other companies conducting similar operations in China, if the PRC tax authorities determine that these contracts were not entered into on an arm’s length basis, they may adjust our income and expenses for PRC tax purposes in the form of a transfer pricing adjustment which may result in an increase in our taxes. In addition, if for any reason we need to cause the transfer of any of the shareholder’s shares in our affiliated Chinese entities to a different nominee shareholder (such as if, for example, any of such shareholders is no longer employed by us), we might be required to pay individual income tax, on behalf of the transferring shareholder, on any gain deemed to have been realized by such shareholder on such transfer.
We generate our internal funds almost exclusively from our subsidiaries. If those entities are restricted from paying dividends to us, we may lose almost all of our internal sources of funds.
We are a holding company with assets consisting primarily of cash generated from our initial public offering in March 2004 and issuance of new shares to MNC in April 2008, and our equity interests in Noveltech Enterprises Limited, or Noveltech, and Linktone Media Limited, or Linktone Media, both of which were incorporated in Hong Kong. See Item 4. “Information on the Company — History and Development of the Company.” Our internal source of funds has been derived almost exclusively from dividend payments from those entities after they receive dividends and payments from our subsidiaries and affiliated Chinese entities. We are likely to lose all of our sources of funds if those entities are restricted from paying dividends to us, except for interest and dividend we earned on our fixed deposits and short-term investments which totaled $1.5 million in 2008, $0.5 million in 2009 and $1.0 million in 2010. See also “— Any changes to our tax incentives could have a material adverse effect on our operating results. Our foreign ADS holders may be subject to PRC withholding tax on the dividends payable by us and upon gains realized on their sales of our ADSs if we are classified as a PRC “resident enterprise” below.”
23
Under Chinese law, Linktone Consulting, Huitong, Linktone Internet, Xintong, Wang You, Linktone Software and Ruida are required to set aside a portion of their net income each year to fund certain reserve funds. These reserves are established to offset losses and for other general purposes under Chinese law and they are not distributable as cash dividends. If further restrictions on payments of dividends by our subsidiaries are implemented under Chinese law, our revenue could decrease significantly.
If any of our subsidiaries incurs any debt, it could impact our ability to pay dividends on our ordinary shares or ADSs.
If any of our subsidiaries incurs debt on its own behalf in the future, the instruments governing the debt may restrict their ability to pay dividends or make other distributions to us, which in turn would limit our ability to pay dividends on our ordinary shares or ADSs.
Computer viruses and hacking may cause delays or interruptions on our systems and may reduce use of our services and harm our reputation.
Computer viruses and hacking may cause delays or other service interruptions on our systems. “Hacking” involves efforts to gain unauthorized access to information or systems or to cause intentional malfunctions or loss or corruption of data, software, hardware or other computer equipment. In addition, the inadvertent transmission of computer viruses could expose us to a material risk of loss or litigation and possible liability. We may be required to expend significant capital and other resources to protect our systems against the threat of such computer viruses and hacking and to rectify any damage to our systems. Moreover, if a computer virus or hacking which affects our systems is highly publicized, our reputation could be materially damaged and usage of our services may decrease.
Our revenue fluctuates significantly and may adversely impact the trading price of our ADSs or any other securities which become publicly traded.
Our revenue and results of operations have varied in the past and may continue to fluctuate in the future. Many of the factors that cause such fluctuation are outside our control such as the changes in the policies of the operators and the enforcement of these policies. Steady revenue and results of operations will depend largely on our ability to:
| • | | attract and retain users in the increasingly competitive telecom value-added services markets in China and Indonesia, |
|
| • | | successfully implement our business strategies, and |
|
| • | | update and develop our services, technologies and content, including aggregating, customizing and localizing third party technologies and content for the China market and other Asian markets we are entering. |
Because the telecom value-added services industry in China and Indonesia is rapidly evolving and our business is also relatively new, including in particular our strategy to enter other markets in Asia such as the market for entertainment and entertainment products, and has experienced significant volatility in terms of financial results as a result of the factors stated above, you should not rely on quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our results of operations as an indication of our future performance. It is possible that future fluctuations may cause our results of operations to be below the expectations of market analysts and investors. This could cause the trading price of our ADSs to decline.
24
We may be held liable for information displayed on or retrieved from our service offerings.
We may face liability for defamation, negligence, copyright, patent or trademark infringement and other claims based on the nature and content of the materials that are provided via our telecom value-added services. For example, we could be subject to defamation claims for messages posted on our services that allow chatting, or SMS news updates sent to users by us could possibly be deemed to contain state secrets in violation of applicable Chinese law. In addition, third parties could assert claims against us for losses incurred in reliance on information distributed by us. We may incur significant costs in investigating and defending these claims, even if they do not result in liability.
We may not be able to adequately protect our intellectual property, and we may be exposed to infringement claims by third parties.
We rely on a combination of copyright, trademark and trade secrecy laws and contractual restrictions on disclosure to protect our intellectual property rights. We have registered 107 trademarks with China’s Trademark Office, and are in the process of applying for 34 additional trademarks in China. We have also obtained 27 copyright certificates in China for certain cartoons and images and 40 copyright certificates for computer software. We have no trademarks registered in the other markets in which we operate, including Indonesia. Our efforts to protect our proprietary rights may not be adequate and effective to prevent infringement or misappropriation of our intellectual property rights, particularly in China where the laws may not protect our proprietary rights as fully as in the United States. Monitoring unauthorized use of our services is difficult and costly, and we cannot be certain that the steps we take will effectively prevent misappropriation of our technology and content. For example, competitors could copy one or more of our downloadable icons, and we may not become aware of the infringement in a timely manner or at all or be able to take effective action to enforce our rights.
From time to time, we may have to resort to litigation to enforce our intellectual property rights, which could result in substantial costs and diversion of our resources. In addition, third parties may initiate litigation against us for alleged infringement of their proprietary rights. In the event of a successful claim of infringement and our failure or inability to develop non-infringing technology or content or license the infringed or similar technology or content on a timely basis, our business could suffer. Moreover, even if we are able to license the infringed or similar technology or content, license fees that we pay to licensors could be substantial or uneconomical.
Prolonged disruptions to the global credit and capital markets and the global economy may materially and adversely affect our results of operations, financial conditions, prospects and future expansion plans.
Since the second half of 2008, global credit and capital markets, particularly in the United States and Europe, have experienced generally difficult conditions, and many of the world’s major economies experienced slow or negative growth in 2010. These challenging market conditions have resulted in reduced liquidity, greater volatility, widening of credit spreads, lack of price transparency in credit markets, a reduction in available financing and lack of market confidence. These factors, combined with declining business and consumer confidence and increased unemployment in the United States and elsewhere in the world, have precipitated a global economic slowdown. Given the dramatic change in the overall credit environment and economy, it is difficult to predict how long these conditions will exist and the extent to which we may be affected. The uncertainty and volatility of credit and capital markets and the overall economy has had and may continue to have an adverse effect on our business. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that measures implemented by governments around the world to stabilize the credit and capital markets and new financial and economic policies, rules and regulations in jurisdictions where we operate will improve market confidence and the overall credit environment and economy. As a result, prolonged disruptions to the global credit and capital markets and the global economy may materially and adversely affect the Chinese economy and in the other markets where we offer our products and services, consumer spending in such markets and our business, results of operations, financial condition, prospect and future expansion plans.
25
Implementation of the PRC Labor Contract Law has increased and may further increase our operating expenses and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
The PRC Labor Contract Law became effective on January 1, 2008. The Labor Contract Law requires, among other things, employers to sign written contracts with their employees, restricts the use of temporary workers and formalizes workers’ rights concerning overtime hours, pensions, layoffs and the role of trade unions and provides for specific standards and procedures for the termination of an employment contract. In addition, the Labor Contract Law requires the payment of a statutory severance amount upon the termination of an employment contract in most cases. For further requirements imposed by the Labor Contract Law, please see Item 4.B. “Business Overview — Government Regulation — Labor Contract Law.” In December 2007, we performed an internal review of our human resource policies and employment contracts with our employees including part-time employees and took all steps necessary to comply with the Labor Contract Law. Implementation of the Labor Contract Law has increased and may further increase our operating expenses and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Natural disasters such as earthquakes may affect our telecom value-added services.
Natural disasters such as snow storms, earthquakes, floods, typhoons and droughts may affect our telecom value-added services because provision of these services may be curtailed due to technical problems. For example, as a result of a 8.0 magnitude earthquake that struck the City of Wenchuan in Sichuan province on May 12, 2008, our provision of telecom value-added service in Sichuan province was interrupted due to certain technical problems. In addition, on April 14, 2010, China experienced an earthquake with a reported magnitude of 6.9 on the Richter scale in Qinghai Province, resulting in the death of over 2,000 people, and causing an interruption to our telecom value-added service.
We have limited business insurance coverage.
The insurance industry in China is still at an early stage of development. Insurance companies in China offer limited business insurance products and do not, to our knowledge, offer business liability insurance. As a result, we do not have any business liability insurance coverage for our operations. Moreover, while business disruption insurance is available, we have determined that the risks of disruption and cost of the insurance are such that we do not require it at this time. Any business disruption, litigation or natural disaster might result in substantial costs and diversion of resources.
We may be or become a passive foreign investment company, which could result in adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. investors.
We may be classified as a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Such characterization could result in adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to you if you are a U.S. investor. For example, U.S. investors who owned our shares or ADSs during any taxable year in which we were a PFIC generally are subject to increased U.S. tax liabilities and reporting requirements for that taxable year and all succeeding years, regardless of whether we actually continue to be a PFIC, although a shareholder election to terminate such deemed PFIC status may be available in certain circumstances.
26
The determination of whether or not we are a PFIC is made on an annual basis and depends on the composition of our income and assets, including goodwill, from time to time. Specifically, we will be classified as a PFIC for U.S. tax purposes for a taxable year if either (a) 75.0% or more of our gross income for such taxable year is passive income (the “income test”), or (b) 50.0% or more of the average percentage of our assets during such taxable year either produce passive income or are held for the production of passive income (the “asset test”). For such purposes, if we directly or indirectly own 25.0% or more of the shares of another corporation, we generally will be treated as if we (a) held directly a proportionate share of the other corporation’s assets, and (b) received directly a proportionate share of the other corporation’s income.
We believe we were a PFIC for United States federal income tax purposes for the previously ended taxable year and may be classified as a PFIC for the current taxable year. Under the income and asset tests, whether or not we are a PFIC will be determined annually based upon the composition of our income and the composition and valuation of our assets, all of which are subject to change. In addition, in valuing our assets, we have made a number of assumptions which we believe are reasonable. However, it is possible that the IRS may disagree with these assumptions, which may affect the determination of whether we are a PFIC in a given year. Because the PFIC determination is highly fact intensive and made at the end of each taxable year, there can be no assurance that we will or will not be a PFIC for the current or any future taxable year or that the IRS will not challenge our determination concerning our PFIC status.
Under recently enacted U.S. legislation effective as of March 18, 2010 and subject to future guidance, if we are a PFIC, U.S. Holders (as defined below) will be required to file an annual information return with the IRS relating to their ownership of our shares or ADSs. Pursuant to recent IRS guidance, this reporting requirement has been suspended until the IRS releases a revised version of IRS Form 8621. Additional guidance is expected regarding the specific information that will be required to be reported on the revised IRS Form 8621. Prior to filing their annual income tax returns, U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding whether additional guidance has been issued with respect to this reporting requirement, and if so, how to comply with such guidance.
For further discussion of the adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences of our possible classification as a PFIC, see Item 10.E. “Additional Information — Taxation — United States Federal Income Taxation.”
We may have to constrain our business activities to avoid being deemed an investment company under the U.S. Investment Company Act of 1940.
The United States Investment Company Act of 1940, or the 1940 Act, provides generally that a company is an investment company which must register as such under the 1940 Act and comply with its regulations if: (i) the company is or holds itself out as being engaged primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities; or (ii) more than 40% of the value of the company’s total assets is represented by investment securities as defined therein. The 1940 Act contains substantive regulations with respect to investment companies, including restrictions on their capital structure, operations, transactions with affiliates and other matters that would be incompatible with our operations. We may therefore have to incur significant costs and management time to avoid investment company status and may suffer other adverse consequences if we are deemed to be an investment company under the 1940 Act.
A substantial portion of our assets may or are likely to be considered investment securities for purposes of the 1940 Act. These assets include fixed time deposits and short- and long-term investments. Although we believe that we do not currently fall within the definition of an investment company under the 1940 Act, we may not be able to conduct or significantly expand our business activities in relation to these types of assets in the future, and there is no assurance that we will not be deemed an investment company under the 1940 Act in the future.
27
Failure to achieve and maintain effective internal controls could have a material adverse effect on the trading price of our ADSs.
We are subject to the reporting obligations under the U.S. securities laws, and are required by the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, as directed by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to include a report of management on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. In addition, if we become an “accelerated filer” as such term is defined in the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, our independent registered public accounting firm would be required to report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting in future annual reports on Form 20-F. Although our management concluded that our internal controls are effective in this annual report, our management may not conclude that our internal controls are effective in the future. Moreover, even if our management concludes that our internal control over our financial reporting is effective, our independent registered public accounting firm may disagree. If our independent registered public accounting firm is required to report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting but it is not satisfied with such control or the level at which our controls are documented, designed, operated or reviewed, or if the independent registered public accounting firm interprets the requirements, rules or regulations differently from us, then it may decline to report on such effectiveness or may issue an adverse opinion. Any of these possible outcomes could result in the loss of investor confidence in the reliability of our financial statements, which in turn could negatively impact the trading price of our ADSs. Furthermore, we have incurred, and expect to continue to incur, significant costs and use significant management and other resources in an effort to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and other requirements.
We are controlled by MNC, whose interests may differ from other shareholders.
MNC currently holds approximately 58.1% of our outstanding ordinary shares. Accordingly, it has significant influence in determining the outcome of any corporate transaction or other matter submitted to the shareholders for approval. In addition, without the consent of MNC, we may be prevented from entering into transactions that could be beneficial to us. The interests of MNC may differ from the interests of the other shareholders.
We may not be able to collect our loans to PT Cakrawala Alam Semesta, such arrangements could be deemed to be in violation of existing or future Indonesian regulations, and depreciation in the value of Indonesian rupiah may adversely affect our results of operations.
During the period from July to November 2009, we extended loans in the aggregate principal amount of US$35.0 million to PT Cakrawala Alam Semesta, or Cakrawala, an Indonesian company controlled by us through contractual arrangements and treated as our VIE for accounting purposes. Cakrawala is owned by two of MNC Group’s employees. See Item 5. “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects — Our Corporate Structure” for information regarding such contractual arrangements. Cakrawala places the money we loaned to it in fixed time deposits with Indonesian banks. Such deposits can only be made by domestic Indonesian entities, and we established this VIE arrangement with Cakrawala to take advantage of favorable interest rates on fixed time deposits in Indonesia. Such fixed time deposits were in U.S. dollars in 2009, and in February 2010 we converted approximately US$15 million into Indonesian rupiah. Since these VIE arrangements may not be as effective as direct ownership in providing us control over Cakrawala, in the event that Cakrawala fails to perform its obligations under our loan agreement with it, we may incur a loss on this loan or costs to enforce these arrangements. In 2010, Cakrawala has partially repaid the loans. As at December 31, 2010, the outstanding loan balance was US$13.9 million.
28
In addition, there have been media reports that Indonesia’s central bank will announce measures on capital flows to control the frequent inflow and outflow of short-term funds. We cannot predict whether, or when, the Indonesian government will introduce capital control mechanisms in the future. Moreover, our VIE arrangements with Cakrawala could possibly be deemed a violation of existing Indonesian regulations on foreign investments in Indonesian fixed time deposits. In each case, our VIE arrangements with Cakrawala might be prohibited or restricted, which, if applied, could have a material adverse effect on our investments in Indonesia.
The Indonesian rupiah experienced significant depreciation against the US dollar during the Asian economic crisis in 1997 and the exchange rate has fluctuated significantly in recent years. Although the Indonesian rupiah has appreciated considerably from its low point in 1998, we cannot assure you that similar depreciation in the Indonesian rupiah will not occur in the future. Such depreciation, if it occurs, would result in a loss on the value of our investments in US dollar terms.
Our business may be adversely affected due to public concerns over the security and privacy of confidential user information.
Our business may be adversely affected if the public concern over the security and privacy of confidential user information transmitted over the internet and wireless networks is not adequately addressed and if significant breaches of network security or user privacy occur.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR INDUSTRY
Our business and results of operations may be adversely affected by the restructuring of the Chinese telecommunications industry and the launch of 3G mobile networks.
In an effort to promote greater competition among the telecommunications operators and foster the development of 3G mobile networks, on May 24, 2008, MIIT, the PRC National Development and Reform Commission, or the NDRC, and the PRC Ministry of Finance jointly issued the Notice on Strengthening the Reform of Telecommunications Systems, or the Telecom Notice, which was adopted to consolidate China’s previously existing telecommunication operators into three new telecommunications operators that can offer both mobile and fixed line services. In accordance with the Telecom Notice, in 2008 China Railway Communication Co., Ltd., which operated a national fixed line network, merged into China Mobile, China Telecom acquired the Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) wireless business and network from China Unicom, and China Netcom, which was principally a fixed line operator, merged into China Unicom, which operates a Global System for Mobile communications (GSM) network and business. In January 2009, following the completion of this restructuring, the PRC government issued licenses to operate 3G mobile networks to China Mobile, China Unicom and China Telecom.
We believe the elimination of uncertainties relating to the telecommunications industry restructuring plan and the launch of 3G mobile technologies are likely to attract new participants to the telecom value-added services market and motivate our existing competitors to adapt more aggressive strategies. If we are unable to adapt our strategy successfully and maintain and enhance our relationships with the surviving operators, our competitive position in the market may be adversely affected. In particular, the launch of 3G mobile technologies could radically alter or even eliminate the market for SMS or 2.5G (including multimedia messaging services, or MMS, WAP and Java games), which are services with which we are more familiar. Having evaluated market opportunities for 3G services in China, we have determined not to offer any services in this area at this time. However, as 3G or other standards develop in China, we may determine in the future to enter this or other markets. In Indonesia, we have commenced offering 3G services although we have limited experience offering these types of services. Because of our limited experience commercially offering such services, we may not be able to offer services which are attractive to 3G users in Indonesia in a timely manner or at all. Our inability to successfully capture opportunities in the 3G market could materially and adversely affect our operating results.
29
The Chinese government or one or more of the operators may prevent us from distributing, and we may be subject to liability for, content that any of them believe is inappropriate.
China has enacted regulations governing telecommunication service providers, internet access and the distribution of news and other information. In the past, the Chinese government has stopped the distribution of information over the internet that it believes to violate Chinese law, including content that is obscene, incites violence, endangers national security, is contrary to the national interest or is defamatory. In addition, we may not publish certain news items, such as news relating to national security, without permission from the Chinese government. Furthermore, the Ministry of Public Security has the authority to cause any local internet service provider to block any website maintained outside China at its sole discretion.
The operators in China also have their own policies regarding the distribution of inappropriate content by telecom value-added service providers and have punished certain providers for distributing content deemed by them to be obscene. Such punishments have included censoring of content, delays in payments of fees by the operators to the offending service provider, restrictions on the ability of the service provider to bill for its services and suspension of the service on the operators’ networks. Accordingly, even if we comply with Chinese governmental regulations relating to licensing and foreign investment prohibitions, if the Chinese government or one or more of the operators were to take any action to limit or prohibit the distribution of information or to limit or regulate any current or future content or services available to users, our revenue could be reduced and our reputation harmed.
Telecommunication laws and regulations in China are evolving and subject to interpretation and may change in the future. If we are found to be in violation of current or future Chinese laws or regulations, we could be subject to severe penalties.
Although telecom value-added services are subject to general regulations regarding telecommunication services, we believe that currently, there are few Chinese laws at the national level specifically explicitly governing telecom value-added services, such as our services related to SMS, MMS, WAP and audio-related services. Many providers of telecom value-added services have obtained various value-added telecommunication services licenses. Although Weilan, Unilink, Cosmos, Zhong Tong, Lian Fei, Qimingxing, Beijing Ojava and Lianyu have obtained inter-provincial value-added telecommunication services licenses issued by MIIT or its local counterpart, we cannot be certain that other local or national value-added telecommunication services license requirements will not be imposed or will not conflict with each other or that any given license will be deemed sufficient by the relevant governmental authorities for the provision of this category of service. It is also possible that new national legislation might be adopted to regulate such services.
30
If we or our subsidiaries or affiliates are found to be in violation of any existing or future Chinese laws or regulations regarding telecom value-added services or internet access which is discussed in the following risk factor, the relevant Chinese authorities have the power to, among other things:
| • | | levy fines and prohibit new product and service offerings; |
|
| • | | confiscate our income or the income of our subsidiaries and affiliates; |
|
| • | | revoke our business license or the business license of our subsidiaries and affiliates; |
|
| • | | shut down our servers or the servers of our subsidiaries and affiliates and/or blocking any websites that we operate; and |
|
| • | | require us to discontinue any portion or all of our telecom value-added services business. |
The regulation of internet website operators is also unclear in China, and our business could be adversely affected if we are deemed to have violated applicable laws and regulations.
Our affiliates, Weilan and Yuan Hang, operate internet websites in China, which are one of the channels through which our services are offered. The interpretation and application of existing Chinese laws and regulations, the stated positions of the main governing authority, MIIT, and the possibility of new laws, regulations or policy positions being adopted have created significant uncertainty regarding the legality of existing and future foreign investments in, and the businesses and activities of, Chinese companies with internet operations including those of our company. In particular, MIIT has stated that the activities of internet content providers are subject to regulation by various Chinese government authorities, depending on the specific activities conducted by the internet content provider.
On July 13, 2006, MIIT issued a notice with the purpose of increasing the regulation of foreign investment in and operations of telecom value-added services which includes internet and telecommunications businesses in China. The regulations require Chinese entities (or shareholders of such Chinese entities) to own and control the internet domain names and registered trademarks, and to have servers and other equipment used to host and operate websites and conduct business. The ownership requirements functionally limit foreign direct and indirect ownership and control of the intellectual property of these businesses even when attempted through various parallel control, licensing, use and management agreements. It is unclear whether these regulations will be strictly enforced or be reiterated by the government in future. The government has provided that the new regulations apply retroactively and requests that value-added services operators self-audit under these regulations and hold themselves accountable to MIIT local offices. Failure to comply may cause MIIT to terminate a telecommunications license or otherwise modify existing agreements or require the disposition of the assets by the foreign entity. Any anticipated foreign investment in such businesses will be subject to prior approval by MIIT, and it is expected that approval for investment may not be easily obtained for foreign investment in these businesses unless in strict compliance with the requirements of MIIT. We cannot be certain that the commercial internet content provider license issued by the local Shanghai Municipal Telecommunications Administration Bureau and held by Weilan or any value-added telecommunication license held by Weilan, Unilink, Cosmos, Zhong Tong, Lian Fei, Qimingxing, Beijing Ojava and Lianyu will satisfy these requirements. Our failure to comply with applicable Chinese internet regulations could subject us to severe penalties as noted in the prior risk factor.
31
RISKS RELATED TO DOING BUSINESS IN CHINA
A slowdown in the Chinese economy may reduce our growth and profitability.
The growth of the Chinese economy has been uneven across geographic regions and economic sectors, and the Chinese government has recently implemented various measures to slow economic growth in order to limit inflation. The Chinese economy overall affects our profitability as spending on telecom value-added services may decrease due to slowing domestic demand. More specifically, increased penetration of telecom value-added services in the less economically developed central and western provinces of China will depend on potential customers in those provinces achieving certain income levels so that mobile handsets and related services become affordable to a significant portion of the population.
Government regulation of the telecommunications, television and internet industries may become more burdensome.
Government regulation of the telecommunications, television and internet industries is burdensome and may become more burdensome. New regulations could increase our costs of doing business and prevent us from efficiently delivering our services. These regulations may stop or slow down the expansion of our user base and limit the access to our services. In addition to new laws and regulations, existing laws not currently applicable to the telecom value-added services may be applied to those services in the future.
Any changes to our tax incentives could have a material adverse effect on our operating results. Our foreign ADS holders may be subject to PRC withholding tax on the dividends payable by us and upon gains realized on their sales of our ADSs if we are classified as a PRC “resident enterprise.”
Certain of our subsidiaries and affiliated Chinese entities enjoy tax exemptions and reduced tax rates, which increase our net income. See Item 5. “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects — Taxation.” The new PRC Enterprise Income Tax law, or the new EIT law, which became effective on January 1, 2008, generally provides grandfather treatment for companies entitled to preferential tax exemptions granted prior to such effective date but requires annual assessment for exemptions previously granted to high and new technology enterprises. Three of our affiliated entities, namely Yuan Hang, Cosmos and Beijing Ojava, passed their respective assessments as high and new technology enterprises for 2008 and continued to be entitled to preferential tax treatments for three years from 2008 to 2010. Another affiliated entity, Huitong, passed its assessment as a high and new technology enterprise for 2009 and continues to be entitled to preferential tax treatment for three years from 2009 to 2011. The high and new technology enterprise status is valid for a period of three years from the date of issuance of the certificate and is subject to an annual self-review process whereby a form is submitted to relevant tax authority for approval to use a preferential income tax rate. If there are significant changes in the business operations, manufacturing technologies or other criteria that cause the enterprise to no longer meet the criteria as a “high and new technology enterprise,” such status will be terminated from the year of such change. Huitong and Yuan Hang will re-apply to be considered a high and new technology enterprise at the end of their respective three–year terms, and we expect that Cosmos and Beijing Ojava will not re-apply for such status. One of our affiliated entities, Lian Fei, did not qualify as a high and new technology enterprise in 2008 to 2010 and therefore, was not entitled to preferential tax treatment in those years. Our future results could be materially and adversely affected if we are not able to maintain similar preferential tax treatment.
The new EIT law provides that enterprises incorporated inside or outside of China with a “de factomanagement body” in China are considered “resident enterprises” and will be subject to the uniform 25% enterprise income tax rate on their global income. The “de factomanagement body” is defined as the organizational body that effectively exercises overall management and control over production and business operations, personnel, finance and accounting and properties of the enterprise. On April 22, 2009, the PRC State Administration of Taxation further issued a notice entitled “Notice Regarding Recognizing Offshore-Established Enterprises Controlled by PRC Shareholders as Resident Enterprises Based on Their De Facto Management Body.” Under this notice, a foreign company controlled by a PRC company or a group of PRC companies shall be deemed as a PRC resident enterprise if (i) the senior management and the core management departments in charge of its daily operations mainly function in the PRC; (ii) its financial decisions and human resource decisions are subject to decisions or approvals of persons or institutions in the PRC; (iii) its major assets, accounting books, company seals, minutes and files of board meetings and shareholders’ meetings are located or kept in the PRC; and (iv) more than half of the directors or senior management personnel with voting rights reside in the PRC. Although our company is not controlled by any PRC company or a group of PRC companies, we cannot assure you that we will not be deemed to be a “resident enterprise” of the PRC under the notice mentioned above or the new EIT law and thus not be subject to PRC enterprise income tax on our global income.
32
In addition, under the implementation rules of the new EIT law, dividends paid to “non-resident enterprises” by “resident enterprises” on profits earned after January 1, 2008 are regarded as income from “sources within the PRC” and therefore subject to a 10.0% withholding income tax, while dividends on profits earned before January 1, 2008 are not subject to the withholding income tax. A lower withholding income tax rate of 5.0% is applied if the “non-resident enterprises” are registered in Hong Kong or other jurisdictions that have a favorable tax treaty arrangement with China. Nevertheless, the PRC State Administration of Taxation promulgated a tax notice on October 27, 2009, or Circular 601, which provides that tax treaty benefits will be denied to “conduit” or shell companies without business substance, and a beneficial ownership analysis will be used based on a “substance-over-form” principle to determine whether or not to grant tax treaty benefits. It is unclear at this early stage whether Circular 601 applies to dividends from our PRC subsidiaries paid to us through our Hong Kong subsidiaries. It is possible that under Circular 601 our Hong Kong subsidiaries would not be considered to be the beneficial owners of any such dividends, and that, if such dividends are subject to withholding, such withholding rate would be 10% rather than the favorable 5% rate generally applicable under the tax treaty between mainland China and Hong Kong.
Because we may be treated as a “resident enterprise,” any dividends paid to the corporate shareholders or shareholders appearing as corporate entities on the share registers of Linktone which are considered “non-resident enterprises” may be subject to withholding income tax and the value of the investment in our shares or ADSs may be adversely and materially affected.
33
All participants in our existing equity compensation plans who are PRC citizens may be required to register with the State Administration of Foreign Exchange of the PRC, or SAFE. We may also face regulatory uncertainties that could restrict our ability to adopt additional equity compensation plans for our directors, employees and other parties under PRC law.
In December 2006, the People’s Bank of China, or PBOC, promulgated the Administrative Measures for Individual Foreign Exchange, which set forth the respective requirements for foreign exchange transactions by PRC individuals under either the current account or the capital account. The Implementation Rules of the Administrative Measures for Individual Foreign Exchange, issued in January 2007 by SAFE, specify the approval requirements for PRC citizens who are granted shares or share options by an overseas listed company according to its employee stock ownership plan or stock option plan.
In March 2007, SAFE promulgated the Processing Guidance on Foreign Exchange Administration for Domestic Individuals Participating in Employee Stock Holding Plans or Stock Option Plans of Overseas-Listed Companies, or the Share Option Plan. According to the Share Option Plan, PRC citizens who are granted shares or share options by an overseas listed company according to its employee share option or share incentive plan are required, through the PRC subsidiary of such overseas listed company or other qualified PRC agents, to register with SAFE and complete certain other procedures related to the share option or other share incentive plan. Foreign exchange income from the sale of shares or dividends distributed by the overseas listed company may be converted into Renminbi or transferred to the employees’ individual foreign exchange savings account after such foreign exchange income is remitted into China. In addition, the overseas listed company or its PRC subsidiary or other qualified PRC agent is required to appoint an asset manager or administrator, appoint a custodian bank and open dedicated foreign currency accounts to handle transactions relating to the share option scheme or other share incentive plan. We and our PRC citizen employees who have been and will be granted share options, or PRC option holders, are subject to these rules. If we or our PRC option holders fail to comply with these rules, we or our PRC option holders may be subject to fines and legal or administrative sanctions.
The uncertain legal environment in China could limit the legal protection available to our investors.
The Chinese legal system is a civil law system based on written statutes. Unlike common law systems, it is a system in which decided legal cases have little precedential value. In the late 1970s, the Chinese government began to promulgate a comprehensive system of laws and regulations governing economic matters. The overall effect of legislation enacted over the past 30 years has significantly enhanced the protection afforded to foreign invested enterprises in China. However, these laws, regulations and legal requirements are relatively recent and are evolving rapidly, and their interpretation and enforcement involve uncertainties. These uncertainties could limit the legal protection available to foreign investors such as the right of foreign invested enterprises to hold licenses and permits such as a value-added telecommunication license and requisite business licenses.
Any recurrence of severe acute respiratory syndrome, or SARS, an outbreak of the H5N1 strain of bird flu (avian influenza) or the H1N1 strain of swine influenza or another widespread public health problem could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
A renewed outbreak of SARS or another widespread public health problem in China, where substantially all of our revenue is derived, in Shanghai, where our principal executive offices are located, and in Beijing, where our principal branch office is located, could have a negative effect on our operations. In addition, there has been confirmed human cases of avian influenza in PRC, Vietnam, Iraq, Thailand, Indonesia, Turkey and Cambodia and swine influenza in PRC, Japan, Korea and other countries which have proven fatal in some instances. If such an outbreak or any other similar epidemic were to spread in China, where most of our operations are located, it may adversely affect our business and operating results.
34
Our operations may be impacted by a number of health-related factors, including the following:
| • | | quarantines or closures of some of our offices which would severely disrupt our operations, |
|
| • | | the sickness or death of our key officers and employees, and |
|
| • | | a general slowdown in the Chinese economy or in any of the other markets where we operate directly or through strategic partnerships. |
Any of the foregoing events or other unforeseen consequences of public health problems could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Changes in China’s political and economic policies could harm our business.
The economy of China has historically been a planned economy subject to governmental plans and quotas and has, in certain aspects, been transitioning in recent years to a more market-oriented economy. Although we believe that the economic reform and the macroeconomic measures adopted by the Chinese government have had a positive effect on the economic development of China, we cannot predict the future direction of these economic reforms or the effects these measures may have on our business, financial position or results of operations. In addition, the Chinese economy differs from the economies of most countries belonging to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, or OECD. These differences include:
| • | | economic structure; |
|
| • | | level of government involvement in the economy; |
|
| • | | level of development; |
|
| • | | level of capital reinvestment; |
|
| • | | control of foreign exchange; |
|
| • | | methods of allocating resources; and |
|
| • | | balance of payments position. |
As a result of these differences, our business may not develop in the same way or at the same rate as might be expected if the Chinese economy were similar to those of the OECD member countries.
35
Restrictions on currency exchange may limit our ability to receive and use our revenue effectively.
Because almost all of our future revenue may be in the form of Renminbi, any future restrictions on currency exchanges may limit our ability to use revenue generated in Renminbi to fund our business activities outside China or to make dividend or other payments in U.S. dollars. Although the Chinese government introduced regulations in 1996 to allow greater convertibility of the Renminbi for current account transactions and paying dividends, significant restrictions still remain, including primarily the restriction that foreign invested enterprises may only buy, sell and/or remit foreign currencies at those banks authorized to conduct foreign exchange business after providing valid commercial documents. In addition, conversion of Renminbi for capital account items, including direct investment and loans, is subject to governmental approval in China, and companies are required to open and maintain separate foreign exchange accounts for capital account items. We cannot be certain that the Chinese regulatory authorities will not impose more stringent restrictions on the convertibility of the Renminbi, especially with respect to foreign exchange transactions.
Chinese regulations relating to foreign exchange and acquisitions of Chinese companies by foreign entities may limit our ability to acquire Chinese companies and adversely affect the implementation of our acquisition strategy as well as our business and business prospects.
On October 21, 2005, SAFE issued the Notice on Issues Relating to the Administration of Foreign Exchange in Fund-raising and Reverse Investment Activities of Domestic Residents Conducted via Offshore Special Purpose Companies, or Notice 75, which became effective as of November 1, 2005. Notice 75 replaced the previous SAFE regulations relating to acquiring of Chinese companies by foreign entities. Notice 75 requires each PRC resident, whether a natural or legal person, to complete the overseas investment foreign exchange registration procedures with the relevant local SAFE branch, prior to establishing or assuming control of an offshore company for the purpose of financing that offshore company with assets or equity interests in an onshore enterprise in China. In addition, an amendment to the registration with the local SAFE branch is required to be filed by any PRC resident that directly or indirectly holds interests in that offshore company upon either (1) the injection of equity interests or assets of an onshore enterprise to the offshore company, or (2) the completion of any overseas fund raising by such offshore company. An amendment to the registration is also required to be filed by such PRC resident when there is any material change involving a change in the capital of the offshore company.
Moreover, Notice 75 applies retroactively. As a result, PRC residents who have established or acquired control of offshore companies that have made onshore investments in China in the past were required to complete the relevant overseas investment foreign exchange registration procedures by March 31, 2006. To implement Notice 75, SAFE issued an implementation notice in May 2007, or Circular 106. Circular 106 specifies the circumstances under which PRC residents are required to comply with Notice 75 and the procedures of compliance. Under Circular 106, in the event a PRC resident failed to file for the relevant investment foreign exchange registration under Notice 75 by March 31, 2006 with respect to an overseas entity, any dividends remitted by the domestic subsidiary to such overseas entity since April 21, 2005 will be deemed as an evasion of foreign exchange purchase rules, making the remittance illegal. The domestic company and its actual controlling person(s) may also be fined. In addition, under Circular 106, failure to comply with the registration procedures set forth in Notice 75 and Circular 106 may result in restrictions on the relevant onshore company, including the payment of dividends and other distributions to its offshore parent or affiliate and the capital inflow from the offshore entity, and may also subject relevant PRC residents to penalties under PRC foreign exchange administration regulations.
On August 8, 2006, six PRC regulatory agencies, namely, MOFCOM, the State Assets Supervision and Administration Commission, the State Administration for Taxation, the State Administration for Industry and Commerce, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, or CSRC, and the PRC State Administration of Foreign Exchange, jointly adopted the Regulations on Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors, or the M&A Rules, which became effective on September 8, 2006 and were amended in June 2009. The M&A Rules established, among other things, additional procedures and requirements that could make merger and acquisition activities by foreign investors more time-consuming and complex, including requirements in some instances that MOFCOM be notified in advance when a foreign investor acquires equity or assets of a PRC domestic enterprise. Complying with the requirements of the M&A Rules to complete such transactions could be time-consuming, and any required approval processes, including obtaining approval from MOFCOM or its local counterparts may delay or inhibit our ability to complete such transactions, which could affect our ability to expand our business or maintain our market share.
36
The interpretation and implementation of the SAFE regulations and the M&A Rules vary from place to place, and it is presently uncertain how these variations and any future legislation concerning offshore or cross-border transactions will be interpreted or implemented by the relevant government authorities in connection with our future offshore financings or acquisitions. Thus, we cannot predict how they will affect our business operations or future acquisition strategy. For example, our present and prospective Chinese subsidiaries’ ability to conduct foreign exchange activities, such as remittance of dividends and foreign-currency-denominated borrowings, may be conditioned upon compliance with the SAFE registration requirements by such Chinese residents, over whom we have no control. In addition, we cannot assure you that such Chinese residents will be able to complete the necessary approval and registration procedures required by the SAFE regulations because we have no control over the outcome of the registration procedures. The failure by such Chinese residents to register with SAFE according to Notice 75 and Circular 106 may significantly limit our PRC subsidiaries’ ability to distribute dividends to us. Such uncertainties may restrict our ability to implement our acquisition strategy and adversely affect our business and prospects.
The value of our ordinary shares and ADSs will be affected by the foreign exchange rate between U.S. dollars and Renminbi.
The value of our ordinary shares and ADSs will be affected by the foreign exchange rate between U.S. dollars and Renminbi. From 1994 to July 21, 2005, the conversion of Renminbi into foreign currencies, including U.S. dollars, was based on exchange rates published by the People’s Bank of China, which were set daily based on the previous day’s interbank foreign exchange market rates in China and current exchange rates on the world financial markets. During that period, the official exchange rate for the conversion of Renminbi to U.S. dollars was generally stable. On July 21, 2005, the Renminbi was revalued and allowed to fluctuate by reference to a basket of foreign currencies, including the U.S. dollar. Under the new policy, the Renminbi was permitted to fluctuate within a band against a basket of foreign currencies. As a result, as of December 31, 2010, the Renminbi has appreciated significantly against the U.S. dollar since July 2005. There remains significant international pressure on the PRC government to adopt a substantially more liberalized currency policy, which could result in a further and more significant appreciation in the value of Renminbi against the U.S. dollar. Further revaluations of Renminbi against the U.S. dollar may also occur. It is difficult to predict how long the current situation may last and when and how the Renminbi exchange rates may change going forward. Our business and the price of our ordinary shares and ADSs could be negatively affected by a revaluation of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollar or by other fluctuations in prevailing Renminbi-U.S. dollar exchange rates. For example, to the extent that we need to convert U.S. dollars into Renminbi for our operational needs and should the Renminbi appreciate against the U.S. dollar at that time, our financial position and the price of our ordinary shares and ADSs may be adversely affected. Conversely, if we decide to convert our Renminbi into U.S. dollars for the purpose of declaring dividends on our ordinary shares or for other business purposes and the U.S. dollar appreciates against the Renminbi, the U.S. dollar equivalent of our earnings from our subsidiaries in China would be reduced.
37
As we are a Cayman Islands company, you may face difficulties in protecting your interests, and our ability to protect our rights through the U.S. federal courts may be limited.
Our corporate affairs are governed by our memorandum and articles of association, the Companies Law (as amended) of the Cayman Islands (the “Companies Law”) and the common law of the Cayman Islands. The rights of our shareholders to take action against the directors, actions by minority shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors under Cayman Islands law are to a large extent governed by the common law of the Cayman Islands. The common law of the Cayman Islands is derived in part from comparatively limited judicial precedent in the Cayman Islands as well as that from English common law, which has persuasive, but not binding, authority on a court in the Cayman Islands. The rights of our shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors under Cayman Islands law are not as clearly established as they would be under statutes or judicial precedents in some jurisdictions in the United States. In particular, the Cayman Islands has a less developed body of securities law as compared to the United States, and provides significantly less protection to investors. In addition, Cayman Islands companies may not have standing to initiate a shareholder derivative action in the federal court of the United States.
In addition, most of our directors and officers are nationals and residents of countries other than the United States. Substantially all of our assets and a substantial portion of the assets of these persons are located outside the United States.
The Cayman Islands courts are also unlikely:
| • | | to recognize or enforce against us judgments of courts of the United States based on certain civil liability provisions of U.S. securities laws; and |
| • | | to impose liabilities against us, in original actions brought in the Cayman Islands, based on certain civil liability provisions of U.S. securities laws that are penal in nature. |
A final and conclusive judgment in the federal or state courts of the United States under which a sum of money is payable, other than a sum payable in respect of taxes, fines, penalties or similar fiscal or revenue obligations and which was neither obtained in a manner nor is of a kind enforcement of which is contrary to natural justice or the public policy of the Cayman Islands, may be subject to enforcement proceedings as a debt in the courts of the Cayman Islands under the common law doctrine of obligation.
As a result of all of the above, our public shareholders may have more difficulties in protecting their interests in the face of actions by our management, directors or controlling shareholders than would shareholders of a public company incorporated in a jurisdiction in the United States.
In addition, Cayman Islands companies may not have standing to sue before the federal courts of the United States. As a result, our ability to protect our interests if we are harmed in a manner that would otherwise enable us to sue in a United States federal court may be limited.
38
| | |
Item 4. | | Information on the Company |
A. History and Development of the Company
We commenced operations as a business division of Intrinsic China Technology Ltd., which was incorporated in the Cayman Islands in November 1999. Intrinsic China Technology focused primarily on developing wireless data software and telecom value-added services. In April 2001, our affiliated business division which focused on wireless data software was spun-off to form a newly established holding company in the Cayman Islands, Intrinsic Technology (Holdings) Ltd., and our company was renamed Linktone Ltd. We are incorporated in the Cayman Islands as an exempted company with limited liability under the Companies Law. Our registered office is located at M&C Corporate Services Limited, P.O. Box 309GT, Ugland House, South Church Street, George Town, Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands. Our principal executive offices are located at Unit C-D, 10F Long Life Building, 1566 West Yan An Road, Shanghai 200052, People’s Republic of China. Our telephone number is 86-21-5305-5656.
For more information on the history and development of our company, see Item 5. “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects — Our Corporate Structure” and “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects — Arrangements with Consolidated Affiliates.”
The following diagram shows the current organizational structure of our principal subsidiaries and affiliated Chinese entities as of April 30, 2011:
39
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ae11/5ae11464666ab957a1e75f07b2391c8e24e68afe" alt="(FLOW CHART)"
| | |
Note 1 | | 75% subsidiary owned by Linktone International Limited (50% acquired in March 2010 and 25% acquired in June 2010) |
|
Note 2 | | 51% subsidiary owned by Linktone International Limited (acquired in June 2010). 39% is owned by MIMEL and 10% by MNC |
|
Note 3 | | Shenzhen Yuan Hang Technology Co., Ltd. |
|
Note 4 | | Beijing Xian Feng Li Liang Media Co., Ltd. |
|
Note 5 | | Shanghai Weilan Computer Co., Ltd., Shanghai Unilink Company Ltd., Beijing Cosmos Digital Technology Co., Ltd., Hainan Zhong Tong Computer Network Communication Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing Lian Fei Wireless Communication Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai Qimingxing E-commerce Co., Ltd., Beijing Ojava Wireless Information Technology Co., Ltd. and Beijing Lianyu Interactive Technology Development Co., Ltd. |
|
Note 6 | | 100% owned by PRC individuals: Shanghai Lang Yi Advertising Co., Ltd. |
|
Note 7 | | 50.01% subsidiary owned by VIE, Shanghai Weilan Computer Co.,Ltd.: Letang Game Limited (acquired in January 2010) |
|
Note 8 | | 60% owned by VIE, Shanghai Weilan Computer Co. Ltd., and 40% owned by VIE, Beijing Lian Fei Wireless Communication Technology Co. Ltd.: Zhong Qing Wei Lian Cultural Communication Co. Ltd. |
|
Note 9 | | 50% owned by VIE, Shanghai Unilink Company Ltd., and 50% owned by VIE, Shanghai Qimingxing E-commerce Co. Ltd.: Shanghai Ling Yu Culture and Communication Co. Ltd. |
|
Note 10 | | 100% owned by InnoForm Media Pte. Ltd. (acquired remaining 49% in July 2010) |
|
Note 11 | | 100% owned by InnoForm Media Pte. Ltd. (acquired in September 2010) |
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14e01/14e01130e9c7a06f1e89b8aa46e28ceec85f81fd" alt="(LINE)" | | Represents equity interest |
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/008a2/008a2d8bfb4b0f49ede67dea7c572bed2cf8173c" alt="(BROKEN LINE)" | | Represents contractual arrangements between the parties |
40
In March 2004, we completed the initial public offering of our ADSs, representing our ordinary shares, and listed those securities on the NASDAQ National Market (now the NASDAQ Global Market).
In April 2008, MNC, through MNC International Limited, or MIL, completed a strategic investment in us and acquired approximately 57.1% of our total outstanding ordinary shares using a combination of a tender offer for existing ADSs and ordinary shares and a subscription for newly-issued ordinary shares. MNC is the largest and only integrated media company in Indonesia, engaging in content production and distribution and operating nationwide free-to-air television networks, 24-hour program television channels, newspapers, tabloids, radio networks and online media. Following this strategic investment, a majority of our board of directors has been comprised of MNC’s nominees. As a result, our business strategies and developments are subject to substantial influence of MNC. In May 2010, MNC through MIL acquired an additional 500,000 ADSs from a third party through a privately negotiated transaction. After this acquisition, MNC holds approximately 58.2% of our total outstanding ordinary shares.
In January 2011, our board of directors approved the appointment of Billy Hsieh as our independent director and member of the audit committee, effective as of February 1, 2011 (replacing Thomas Hubbs who resigned from our board of directors at the same time for personal reasons), and the appointment of Peck Joo Tan as our chief financial officer, effective as of March 1, 2011 (replacing our prior chief financial officer, Colin Sung). Peck Joo Tan was appointed as our director in December 2010.
Our total capital expenditures (all of which related to continuing operations) for 2008, 2009 and 2010 were $0.3 million, $0.1 million and $0.6 million, respectively, primarily consisting of the purchase of computer and office equipment and leasehold improvements. We anticipate that we will have capital expenditures in the next 12 months of approximately $0.5 million for software and technology infrastructure products in connection with our normal maintenance and upgrading routines.
B. Business Overview
TELECOMMUNICATION VALUE-ADDED BUSINESS
We provide entertainment-oriented telecom value-added services and content to mobile users over the 2G and 2.5G mobile telecommunications networks in China and Indonesia, as well as the 3G mobile telecommunications network in Indonesia. We specialize in the development, aggregation, marketing and distribution of user wireless content and applications for access by China’s 842 million and Indonesia’s 195 million mobile phone users (as estimated at the end of 2010), primarily through three mobile network operators in China — China Mobile, China Unicom and China Telecom — and nine mobile network operators in Indonesia — PT Telekomunikasi Selular, or Telkomsel, PT Indosat Tbk, or Indosat, PT XL Axiata Tbk, or XL, PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk, PT Bakrie Telecom, PT Hutchison CP Telecommunication, PT Sampoerna Telekomunikasi Indonesia, PT Natrindo Telepon Seluler and PT Mobile-8 Telecom. We also provide certain audio-related services over the fixed and mobile line telecom networks in China and Indonesia.
Our 2G SMS-based services include ringtones, icons and screen savers, interactive SMS messaging in certain television programs, adventure, action, trivia and fortune-telling games, lunar and Western horoscopes, jokes, fan clubs and event-driven or entertainment news updates.
41
We also offer 2.5G services, which include MMS, such as animated cartoons and screensavers, comic strips, magazine-style “mobile articles” on a variety of topics and event-driven news updates. In addition, our 2.5G, offerings include WAP services, such as WAP-based ringtones, screensavers, games and dating services, and advanced JavaTM games, or Java games. We refer to our SMS, MMS, WAP and JavaTM services as “data-related services” in this annual report. We are also launching 3G services in Indonesia, including services such as e-paper/e-reading, streaming services such as video-on-demand (VOD) on tablet devices and smart TVs, and also radio streaming on mobile applications.
In addition, we offer audio-related services such as “color ring-back tones,” or “CRBT” which replaces the common “ring-ring” sound heard by callers with high quality music and sound effects, and IVR services, which allow users to listen to songs, jokes, stories and coverage of major events. Users can send such audio content, along with personal messages, to the mobile phones of their friends or others.
Our current 2G and 2.5G services are as follows:
| | | | | | |
Technologies | | | | Type of User Service and Content |
| | | | | | |
Data-related Services | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
SMS (2G) | | • Monophonic and Polyphonic Ringtones • Icons and Screen Savers • Endless Battle Space Game • Mobile Pet • Crystal Ball Fortune Telling Game | | • SMS Interactive Television Messaging • SMS Call TV Quiz • SMS Info • SMS Quiz • SMS Polling • SMS Survey • SMS Opinion • SMS Auction | | • Horoscopes • Shio • Feng Shui • Luck Tips • Jokes • Fan Clubs • Event-driven or Entertainment News |
| | | | | | |
MMS/WAP/JavaTM(2.5G) | | • Customizable Monophonic and Polyphonic Ringtones • Color and Animated Icons and Screen Savers | | • JavaTM-based Action, Role-Playing and Adventure Games • WAP-based Card Games and Games of Chance • Television Station WAP • Newspaper/Tabloid/Magazine Mobile Application Version | | |
42
| | | | | | |
Technologies | | | | Type of User Service and Content |
| | | | | | |
Audio-related Services | | • CRBT | | | | |
| | • IVR Services | | • Music • Jokes • Stories • Chat Services • Mobile Novels • Mobile Blogs • Gossip • Lifestyle Advice | | |
Our services and content can be purchased on a monthly subscription or per use basis in China, except for CRBT audio-related services from which we derive our revenue on a per content download basis while the operator collects a monthly network service fee. In Indonesia, our services and content can be purchased on a daily subscription or per use basis, except for CRBT can be purchased on a daily, weekly or monthly basis.
DATA-RELATED SERVICES
SMS
Ringtones, Icons and Screen Savers.Our ringtone, icon and screen saver downloads enable mobile phone users to customize the ringtone of their phones and the image which appears on the phone screens.
We offer over 5,000 and 140 ringtones which have been tailor-made for the Chinese and Indonesian markets, respectively with monophonic as well as polyphonic (which sounds more like real music than the traditional electronic ringing sounds of mobile phones) capabilities. We also offer more than 10,000 icons and screen savers in China and 340 icons and screen savers in Indonesia. These icons and screen savers range in complexity from simple black-and-white images and monochrome color to full color images.
Games.We collaborate with game developers, including Letang, to offer casual, role-playing, action, shooting and racing games to users of mobile devices in China and Indonesia.
TV Quizzes and Polling. In Indonesia, we support MNC’s television shows to allow viewers the chance to win prizes by using their mobile phones to send an SMS during the program. A drawing occurs at the end of the program where a person is chosen at random and contacted. If this person can correctly answer the question asked, he or she wins a prize. We also provide SMS services where users can provide answers to a variety of questions or polls. For example, users can use the SMS service to vote for the contestant they think should win televised talent contests.
Auction. In Indonesia, we offer users a chance to win prizes by joining our SMS Auction Program. During the program, users can bid for a variety of prizes, with the highest bid winning the prize.
43
MMS/WAP/JavaTM
Ringtones, Icons and Screen Savers. Our next generation MMS and WAP ringtones allow users to create their own customized ringtones. We also offer more than 8,000 MMS and WAP color images and color animations.
Games.We offer games based on the JavaTMand BrewTM programming languages which offer an effective way to create sophisticated 2.5G games. Currently we have about 100 Java games available on China Mobile’s mobile network, including fantasy and adventure games such asCategory 3 Mission in the Supernatural World, Monkey King Westward Journey, The Goddess DancerandQijue Maken. We also offer WAP-based card games and games of chance such as blackjack, poker and mahjong, as well as WAP-based versions of our SMS games described above.
News and Entertainment Downloads.Our users can download a variety of event-driven MMS news and entertainment downloads in China and Indonesia. In Indonesia we cooperate with PT Huawei Tech Investment to provide mobile newspapers using MMS though the network operators Telkomsel, XL and Indosat.
WAP. We offer WAP versions of jokes, news, fan clubs, horoscope services and TV stations.
Mobile Applications. We provide mobile applications, such as BlackBerry applications, to extend print content from newspapers, tabloids and magazines into mobile channels using WAP in China and Indonesia.
3G Services
We are also launching 3G services in Indonesia, including services such as e-paper/e-reading, streaming services such as video-on-demand (VOD) on tablet devices and smart TVs, and also radio streaming on mobile applications and WAP. We are also working with members of the MNC Group to offer newspaper and magazine content via 2.5G and 3G networks and music via mobile devices in Indonesia.
AUDIO-RELATED SERVICES
CRBTs.CRBT allows a mobile phone user to customize the sound callers hear when the user’s phone is ringing. We supply a variety of pre-recorded messages from celebrities, sound effects (such as sirens), and a wide range of popular music.
Voice Entertainment Services.We provide IVR services, which allow users to send songs, jokes and stories with personal messages to their mobile phones or to the mobile phones of their friends or others. Our IVR services cover such topics as automobiles, jokes, sports, games and Chinese comedies.
MOBILE GAMES
Our acquisition of a majority interest in Letang in January 2010 strengthened our mobile games portfolio and development capabilities. Letang develops games for mobile phone users which can be accessed through the operators’ networks or embedded in the user’s mobile handset by the handset manufacturer. As of December 31, 2010, Letang had 104 internally developed downloadable mobile games that can be played on the major global mobile phone operating systems and platforms including Flash, Symbian, Java, MTK, Android, BlackBerry and iPhone.
With the build-out of 3G networks which enable real time interactivity and improved data services, we believe mobile online games, which allow users to play internet-based games via their mobile phones, will become popular among mobile phone users in the next several years. Letang launched its first multiplayer online role playing game, MengHuanFengShen, in May 2010 and a second game, XianMoShiJie, in July 2011.
Letang either sells the right to use its games to the mobile game operator for a fixed period or an indefinite period of time or enters into a revenue-sharing arrangement with the mobile operator. We currently have licenses or have purchased the right to use a range of games developed by Letang.
44
PC GAMES
We, through our affiliated entity, Yuan Hang, offer online casual multi-player games such as billiards, card games and mahjong, which can be played on personal computers, or PCs. PC games are easier to play than typical multi-player online role-playing games and can be played to a conclusion within a short period of time. The basic version of most games are available free-of-charge, and we sell virtual game enhancements, such as options for changing the appearance of the game-play or advanced tools, which players can use in the game, utilizing our prepaid point system. As of December 31, 2010, we had 83 PC games.
MEDIA CONTENT — VIDEO AND AUDIO DISTRIBUTION AND RELATED SERVICES
InnoForm, which is 75% owned by our company and 12.5% owned by MNC (through MIMEL), primarily distributes and sells home entertainment products (VCDs/DVDs/Blu-ray discs) and video-on-demand to consumers in Singapore, Malaysia and Indonesia. InnoForm also engages in theatrical distribution of movies, karaoke video licensing, karaoke system rental and providing a karaoke-on-demand channel on Pay TV platforms. InnoForm has wholly owned subsidiaries in Malaysia and Hong Kong, as well as a representative office in Vietnam.
Home Entertainment
InnoForm’s home entertainment products include feature films and television series from Hollywood, feature films and television series from Asia, as well as documentaries and educational movies, videos and pre-school edutainment and animation series for children.
Singapore
| • | | Warner Home Video and Twentieth Century Fox- InnoForm has exclusive licenses from Warner Home Video and Twentieth Century Fox for sale and distribution of certain of their content. InnoForm pays a minimum guaranteed amount as well as a royalty based on sales revenue earned after it has recouped a minimum guaranteed amount. The current licensing contracts with Warner Home Video and Twentieth Century Fox will expire in December 2011 and May 2012, respectively. |
| • | | Theatrical Exhibitors- InnoForm has video output arrangements with theatrical exhibitors such as Shaw Renters (Singapore) Pte Ltd and Golden Village Pictures Pte Ltd which grant a sub-license to InnoForm to sell and distribute in Singapore for a period of time the videos of certain movies that these theatrical exhibitors screen in cinemas. The current agreement with Golden Village will expire in December 2012. The agreement with Shaw Renters is on a per title basis and is for three years after the release date of the particular movie for which InnoForm receives the sub-license. |
Malaysia
| • | | In Malaysia, InnoForm contracts with smaller, independent studios for a sub-license to sell and distribute in Malaysia videos of certain Western films, Asian and local featured films, pre-school edutainment and animation series for children. |
45
Hong Kong
| • | | In Hong Kong, InnoForm sub-licenses from movie distributors for the right to sell and distribute in Hong Kong videos for children’s edutainment, animation series and documentary titles. |
Vietnam
| • | | In Vietnam, InnoForm has exclusive licenses to distribute VCD/DVD/Blu-ray discs through a local agent from three Hollywood studios. |
VOD
For movies and other content for which InnoForm has been licensed the video-on-demand rights, InnoForm licenses such content either to Pay-TV channel providers, such as Star TV and Mei Ya, or to the video-on-demand service of Starhub Ltd., a Singapore cable TV network operator. InnoForm also sells content owned by MNC either on a per-program or entire channel basis to Free TV and cable/satellite TV and Internet Protocol Television (IPTV) operators in Singapore and Malaysia.
Music
Through wholly owned subsidiaries in Singapore, InnoForm licenses karaoke music videos and provides karaoke systems through rental. In Singapore, InnoForm acts as an authorized collecting agent for major international and regional record labels. InnoForm collects a fixed percentage of the reproduction license fees for karaoke music videos on the karaoke-on-demand systems used in night clubs, KTV lounges, pubs, bars/lounges, private clubs and recreational clubs.
In addition, Starhub Ltd operates a karaoke-on-demand channel on a revenue sharing basis with InnoForm, Starhub and participating record labels. Starhub’s existing subscribers may elect access to this channel either through a monthly subscription or a day-pass. Starhub keeps a certain fixed percentage of the total revenue as the carrier of this channel, InnoForm collects a fixed percentage as an aggregator, and the balance is apportioned to participating record labels according to the frequency of their songs being requested by Starhub subscribers.
Cinemas/Films
From time to time, InnoForm also acts as a film distributor and secures distribution rights for certain films on specified platforms, which could include theatrical, video, Free TV, internet or wireless.
REVENUE
China is the principal market in which we compete. As described above, our revenue is primarily comprised of data-related services (SMS and 2.5G services including MMS, WAP and Java games), audio-related services including CRBT, IVR services, mobile games and PC games, as well as media content following our acquisition of a majority interest in InnoForm in 2010. Gross revenue for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended December 31, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2010 | |
| | $m | | | $m | | | $m | |
Data-related services | | | | | | | | | | | | |
China | | | 33.6 | | | | 34.0 | | | | 35.7 | |
Indonesia | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1.8 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | 33.6 | | | | 34.0 | | | | 37.5 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Audio-related services | | | | | | | | | | | | |
China | | | 28.1 | | | | 26.0 | | | | 18.7 | |
Indonesia | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | 28.1 | | | | 26.0 | | | | 18.7 | |
Media content | | | — | | | | — | | | | 12.2 | |
Mobile games | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2.0 | |
PC games | | | 2.0 | | | | 1.1 | | | | 1.3 | |
Others | | | 3.3 | | | | 1.1 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total revenue | | | 67.0 | | | | 62.2 | | | | 71.7 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
46
Cross-Media Advertising Business
Our exclusive advertising arrangements with QTV and TJSTV were terminated in 2008, and our revenues from the related advertising services provided by us are reported in our financial statements as discontinued operations for both current and prior years. We incurred a total net loss from discontinued operations of approximately $20.8 million in 2008. We incurred a net gain of $0.6 million and $0.3 million in 2009 and 2010, respectively from discontinued operations due to a reversal of certain provisions for doubtful accounts receivable as cash was subsequently collected from customers and a lower amount of payables were finalized with suppliers.
OPERATOR SERVICE AGREEMENTS
China
Following the restructuring of the telecom industry in China, which was completed in 2010, China Mobile, China Unicom and China Telecom became the only telecom operators in China. Given their market presence, our negotiating leverage with these operators is limited, and our business is dependent on maintaining our relationships with them. See Item 3.D. “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Business in China — We depend on the principal mobile and fixed line telecommunication network operators in China for delivery of our telecom value-added services, and the termination or alteration of our various contracts with any of them or their provincial or local affiliates could materially and adversely impact our business.” Our affiliates, Weilan, Unilink, Cosmos, Zhong Tong, Lian Fei, Qimingxing, Beijing Ojava and Lianyu, have entered into service agreements with the national and some provincial and local offices of the operators to offer our various services through their networks. For 2008, 2009 and 2010, we derived approximately 73.1%, 74.4% and 52.4%, respectively, of our gross revenue from China Mobile.
Indonesia
Our value-added business in Indonesia primarily depends on the three biggest operators, Telkomsel, Indosat and XL, which together have approximately 90% of the telecom market. In 2010, almost 70% of our revenue generated in that market came from sales of services to Telkomsel’s customers. For the provision of VAS in Indonesia, we have entered into agreements with MNC and its affiliate, Infokom, under which we are authorized to offer our services using short codes owned by those companies. In turn, MNC and Infokom have direct contractual arrangements with the Indonesian telecom operators. After we provide services to users, the telecom operators pay the related revenue, net of their fees, to MNC and Infokom who then pay such amount to our subsidiary, PT Linktone (after deduction of Infokom’s fee for use of its short codes, which equals 10% of the net revenue paid by the telecom operators).
We rely heavily on maintaining good relationships with the telecom operators because their promotion channels are the most effective means for us to promote our services. In order to do business with us, the telecom operators may require exclusivity from us or require that we promote such operator until revenue reaches a certain level per day before they give promotion support on their channel.
Service Fee Arrangements and Network Fees
The following is a summary of the material features of our contractual relationships with the operators in China and the contractual relationships between MNC and Infokom and the Indonesian operators, and is not an exhaustive description.
47
Service Fee Arrangements.In China, China Mobile’s provincial operators charge us a service fee equal to 15.0% of the gross revenue from our SMS, MMS and Java game services (except for Sichuan province which began to separately charge 30.0% in 2011 with the remainder paid to us). We currently pay a service fee equal to 30.0%, 18.0% and 21.0% of the gross revenue from our IVR, CRBT and WAP services, respectively, offered through China Mobile’s network. China Unicom and China Telecom have implemented a sliding scale fee arrangement whereby we receive a range of 43.0% to 85.0% and 51.0% to 85.0%, respectively, of the gross revenue depending on customer usage, revenue and other performance criteria. In 2010, we received on average approximately 83.0%, 75.0% and 53.0%, respectively, of the gross revenue, with China Mobile, China Unicom and China Telecom receiving the remaining 17.0%, 25.0% and 47.0%, respectively. If a user does not pay the applicable fees for our services to China Mobile, China Unicom and China Telecom, the operators usually will not pay us for those services. In addition, the operators, through most of their provincial and local offices, charge us service fees and network fees even if a customer defaults in payment to the operators for our services.
In Indonesia, content providers and operators operate on a revenue sharing basis for fees. There are three classes for allocations of revenue sharing between a content provider and telecom operator, including for providing services such as SMS, WAP and others. In Class A, if the content provider attains a minimum telecom revenue of 100 million Indonesian rupiah (US$11,122 based on a middle exchange rate of US$1: 8,991 rupiah, as reported by Bank of Indonesia on December 31, 2010) per month, then the share is 40% for the telecom operator and 60% for the content provider. In Class B if the content provider attains a minimum telecom revenue of 50-100 million Indonesian rupiah (US$5,561 — US$11,122) per month, then the share is 50% for the telecom operator and 50% for the content provider. In Class C, if the content provider attains a telecom revenue of less than 50 million Indonesian rupiah (US$5,561) per month, then the share is 60% for the telecom operator and 40% for the content provider. The telecom operators test the revenue targets reached by the content provider every six months and adjust the class if appropriate. Through MNC and Infokom, we have a Class A revenue sharing basis for fees with each of Telkomsel, Indosat and XL.
Network Fees.To the extent that the number of messages sent by us over China Mobile’s network exceeds the number of messages our customers send to us, we must also pay a per message network fee. China Mobile applies a sliding scale charge arrangement at a range of RMB0.05 ($0.007) to RMB0.08 ($0.012) and RMB0.15 ($0.02) to RMB0.2 ($0.03) per message network fee for SMS and MMS, respectively. Similarly, we pay China Unicom and its provincial affiliates a per message network fee of RMB0.05 ($0.007), to the extent the messages we send exceed the number of messages sent to us by our customers. China Telecom charges RMB0.05 ($0.007) per message network fee.
We do not collect fees for our services from the operators in a number of circumstances, including if:
| • | | the delivery of our service to a customer is prevented because his or her mobile phone is turned off for an extended period of time, the customer’s prepaid phone card has run out or the customer has ceased to be a customer of the applicable operator, |
|
| • | | the operators experience technical problems with its network which prevent delivery of our services to the customer, |
|
| • | | we experience technical problems with our technology platform that prevent delivery of our services, |
|
| • | | the customer refuses to pay for our service due to quality or other problems, or |
|
| • | | the customer is being quarantined by the telecom operator for some reason. |
These are known as billing and transmission failures. We do not recognize revenue for our services which are deemed to be billing and transmission failures.
48
Term and Termination and Other Material Provisions
The term of our contracts with the operators in China is generally one to two years, while in Indonesia it is generally one year with automatic renewal. In China, we usually renew these contracts or enter into new ones when the prior contracts expire, but on occasion, the renewal or new contract can be delayed by periods of one month or more. In Indonesia, we depend on MNC and Infokom to renew their contracts with the Indonesian operators. The agreements can also be terminated in advance for a variety of reasons which vary among the individual contracts with the operators, including, for example, where we breach our obligations under the contract, a high number of customer complaints are made about our services or we cannot satisfy the operational or financial performance criteria established by the applicable operator. Several of our contracts with the operators can be terminated for no reason upon advance written notice.
Generally, our contracts with the operators are silent on the arrangements relating to payment from the operators in the event such contracts are not renewed. Payment and billing disputes, if any, will therefore be resolved in accordance with the provision in the contracts which generally provides that parties shall resolve disagreements through amicable negotiation (where such provision survives the termination of the respective agreements) or through court proceedings if amicable resolution cannot be reached.
CONTENT RELATIONSHIPS
Data-related Services
Our content collaborators authorize the inclusion of their content in one or more of our services in return for a royalty or fee on a per-download basis, which we pay directly to the provider. These arrangements are usually non-exclusive except for our arrangement with Letang which is exclusive. Our agreements with our content collaborators have terms ranging from six months to four years. In addition, some agreements can be renewed by the parties for additional successive terms indefinitely. Our significant content collaborators in China and Indonesia currently include:
China
| • | | We have exclusive licenses from Letang to use some of its games in our services where we pay Letang a percentage of the revenue received for each game. For certain games, we buy the copyrights of these games outright and pay a fixed fee for each copyright. |
Indonesia
| • | | Letang— We also have exclusive licenses from Letang to use its games in our services in Indonesia where we pay a fixed fee for each copyright. For other games, we pay Letang a percentage of the revenue received for each game. |
| • | | Television Stations— We cooperate with three television stations within the MNC Group — RCTI, MNC TV and Global TV — in order to make their content available to mobile users. We also provide SMS services, such as SMS polling for their entertainment programs. We pay them a percentage of the revenues generated by such services. |
49
| • | | Print Media (Newspaper/Tabloid/Magazine)— We cooperate with two print media companies within the MNC Group. Pursuant to this cooperation, we support their self-branded mobile applications which allow users to access newspaper and magazine content via mobile phones and other mobile devices such as BlackBerry. We also enable digital access to their content using e-paper/e-reader services embedded on tablet devices. We pay them a percentage of the revenues generated by such services. |
| • | | Online Media— We have a partnership with OkeZone, a news and entertainment online media provider within the MNC Group. We cooperate with them to supply news and entertainment content through SMS channels. We pay OkeZone a percentage of the revenues generated by such services. |
| • | | Talent Management— We cooperate with Star Media Nusantara, a company within the MNC Group, to provide SMS communities for particular artists and talents. These communities offer information and tips, photos and video from the particular artists for their fans. We pay such companies a percentage of the revenues generated by such services. |
| • | | Individual Partners— We have arrangements with several individuals who provide us with content such as fortunetelling, love tips, and religious content. We pay such partners a percentage of the revenue generated from such services. |
Audio-related Services
China
| • | | Ocean Butterfly—We are a non-exclusive provider of Ocean Butterfly’s catalog of music for CRBT services. We pay Ocean Butterfly a minimum guaranteed amount as well as a percentage of the profit we earn with respect to the related services after we have recouped the minimum guaranteed amount. Our agreement with Ocean Butterfly expired in June 2011, and we are currently negotiating with them regarding renewal. |
| • | | Universal Music—We have a non-exclusive license from Universal Music through its local registered company in Beijing to provide a catalog of 30 songs via CRBT tones. Under the agreement, we pay Universal Music a lump sum amount to use these songs for a period of two years. The term of our agreement with Universal Music will expire in October 2011. |
| • | | Beijing Le Hai Sheng Shi—We have a non-exclusive license from Beijing Le Hai Sheng Shi to provide a catalog of 100 songs via CRBT tones. Under the agreement, we pay a lump sum amount to use these songs for a period of two years. Our agreement with Beijing Le Hai Sheng Shi will expire in October 2011. |
| • | | Beijing Ding Le Sheng Shi—We have a non-exclusive license from Beijing Ding Le Sheng Shi to provide a catalog of 145 songs for WAP, MMS, SMS, CRBT and IVR services. Under the agreement, we pay a lump sum amount to use these songs for a period of two years. Our agreement with Beijing Ding Le Sheng Shi will expire in January 2012. |
50
Indonesia
| • | | We enter into programs and partnerships with various producers, including Sony Music, Musica and Universal, in order to sell CRBT tones exclusively for certain songs, discographies and artist pictures. Our arrangements with these producers vary and can be either on a per project or per artist basis or under one year contracts with automatic renewals. |
China
| • | | Our IVR products are developed in-house, with a small percentage being outsourced only in the final stage of development. |
| • | | Sing Sung —We have an agreement with Beijing SingSung Media Technology Co., Ltd., the producer of several radio programs, to provide telecom value-added services during the airing of these programs. Under the agreement, we are obligated to pay a deposit amount as well as a percentage of the revenue we receive with respect to the related services after we have recouped the deposit amount. Our agreement with SingSung expired in December 2010, and we are in the process of renewing this agreement. |
Media Content
InnoForm’s agreements with content collaborators have terms ranging from three months to four years. Upon expiration of an agreement, we usually renew the existing contract or enter into a new contract. The agreements may also be terminated prior to the end of the term or before the agreement is implemented for a variety of reasons which vary among the individual contracts with the content collaborators. For example, several of our contracts may be terminated if our content is found to be unfit for consumption by the relevant regulators or censure board or we breach our obligations under the terms and conditions stipulated in the agreements.
Generally, our contracts with content collaborators involve minimum guarantees which are payable in advance or quarterly, half-yearly or annually depending on the contract.
We have exclusive agreements with the following content collaborators for video in Singapore: Warner Home Video Inc, Twentieth Century Fox, Golden Village Pictures Pte Ltd, and Shaw Renters (Singapore) Pte Ltd.
We have exclusive agreements with the following content collaborators for the reproduction of karaoke music videos on karaoke systems in Singapore: Asia Muse, EMI, Forward Music, Gold Typhoon, HIM, Ocean Butterflies, Rock Records, Sony Music, Universal Music, Warner, Xiang Cheng.
We also have a non-exclusive revenue sharing arrangement with Starhub for a karaoke-on-demand channel in Singapore.
51
SALES AND MARKETING
Telecommunication Value-added Business
We sell and market our services and content principally to and through the operators as described below under “—Operator Channels.” We also sell and market through our websites, promotional events, direct marketing, media advertising, handset embedding and other activities as described below under “—Non-Operator Channels.”
Operator Channels
General.Our telecom value-added services are provided through the operators’ networks, and the operators collect all fees for our services from the ultimate users.
China. As of December 31, 2010, we had approximately 46 sales professionals located in 27 provinces covering six regions, namely northeastern, southern, eastern, northern, northwestern and southwestern China, who work closely with the operators at the provincial and local level. As of December 31, 2010, we also had four sales professionals located in Beijing who work closely with the operators at the head office level.
Indonesia. As of December 31, 2010, we had six sales professionals located in Jakarta who work closely with the operators in that market to promote our services.
Non-Operator Channels
We also focus on non-mobile operator sales and marketing activities, such as:
| • | | cooperating with manufacturers and designers of mobile handsets to offer our services to purchasers, |
| • | | conducting integrated marketing campaigns with traditional media companies and multi-national corporations, |
| • | | cooperating with radio stations with effective promotion channels to provide wireless services on music downloads, ringtones and news alerts, and |
| • | | cooperating with television stations and other partners to provide wireless services on popular programs including interactive quizzes and news alerts, through a robust and highly scalable technology platform. |
We have also entered into agreements with more than 200 mobile handset manufacturers and handset designers located in China to embed certain of our telecom value-added services into their handsets for end-users’ easy access in China and Indonesia. We pay them a percentage of the revenue received from the operators, and our agreements with them are usually non-exclusive and have a term of one to two years. In China, the measures on mobile handset embedded services implemented in January 2010 by China Mobile, China Unicom and China Telecom negatively affected our revenue and profitability from data-related services in 2010. See Item 3.D. “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Business in China — Changes in the policies of the operators and in their enforcement of their policies have resulted in our company having to pay additional charges to the operators and have negatively affected our revenue. Further changes could materially and adversely impact our revenue, profitability and financial condition in the future.”
52
Media Content
Our key distribution channels for media content are video retail stores and cinema chains. We market our video and audio distribution services and content principally through point-of-sale displays, media advertising and promotional events, such as:
| • | | displaying our products on stands and posters at major retail stores, |
| • | | promoting our products to customers with popular mascots, |
| • | | advertising our products in lifestyle magazines, motherhood magazines and newspapers, |
| • | | bundling our products with those products from hardware suppliers and marketing creative packages, such as Blu-ray/DVD combinations, box sets and special collectors’ editions, and |
| • | | conducting warehouse sales and fairs with major supermarket chains. |
INFRASTRUCTURE AND TECHNOLOGY
We have developed a flexible and scalable platform with open and adaptive technology. Our Intelligent Application Gateway, or LT-IAG, is a unified platform supporting multiple protocols, networks and billing solutions, with high scalability, load balancing, intelligent session management and performance measurement. Through this platform, we are able to interconnect and provide all major types of 2G, 2.5G, 3G and audio-related services through the networks of the operators. It also allows us to monitor our services and their delivery to the operators’ networks on a real-time basis which allows us to optimize the efficiency of our system and quickly address any problems. The platform is equipped with an open application interface for rapid connectivity by third-party content providers and access to multiple channels for SMS, MMS, WAP and Web connectivity. LT-IAG is connected to the operators’ network on a pan-China basis.
Our user database, which operates on our proprietary software and is an integral part of LT-IAG, allows us to store, analyze, retrieve and compare various statistical information and to identify relevant trends. LT-IAG also supports our customer service activities by providing our service professionals with real-time user data and information regarding service delivery and billing. LT-IAG is fully compatible with the 2.5G technology standard and related services.
In China, our websites and services are made available primarily through network servers located in the facilities of affiliates of China Mobile, China Unicom, China Telecom, 21ViaNet (China) and CNLink in Beijing. As of December 31, 2010, there were 123 such network servers, running on a Linux-based operating system and windows. We lease one dedicated line with 10 megabits per second capacity from 21ViaNet (China), two shared lines with 100 megabits per second capacity from China Unicom, one shared line with 100 megabits per second capacity from China Mobile, one shared line with 100 megabits per second capacity from China Telecom and one dedicated line with three megabits per second capacity from CNLink.
In Indonesia, our websites and services are made available primarily through network servers located in the Cyber Building Data Centre at Jakarta. We have 50 servers that run on the Linux operating system to cover SMS, WAP, database and reporting. Our network connection is directly connected into the Indonesia Internet Exchange (IIX) with 10 megabits per second for local connections. We have several types of network connections with the telecom operators, including both public and virtual private network (VPN) connections, and we also lease direct lines.
53
COMPETITION
China
Our competition in China is comprised of a wide range of companies. There are companies which, like Linktone, focus primarily or entirely on value-added services and offer a wide range of services. These include participants such as KongZhong, as well as smaller companies such as Zhangxun and Boxun Rongtong. These competitors are generally characterized by strong market knowledge and, in some cases, well-developed relationships with the operators on a local and national basis. They also tend to focus on entertainment-related services.
Other competitors include the major internet portal operators in China, including TOM Online Inc., which is an affiliate of internet portal operator TOM Group Limited, and publicly-listed companies such as SINA CORP. and Sohu.com Inc. The internet portals leverage their existing strength in aggregating content, marketing and cross-selling among their established internet user base to promote telecom value-added services. Each of SINA CORP., Sohu.com Inc. and TOM Online Inc. is significantly better capitalized than our company.
There are also niche service providers, such as TENCENT Inc., Enorbus Technologies and Solute Wireless, which focus primarily on a particular market segment or application, such as wireless instant messages, that often builds on a pre-existing competency in the sector.
In addition, we also face growing competition from China Mobile, China Unicom and China Telecom as they increase their offerings of telecom value-added services.
We may also face competition from companies in China which offer online and media services and are expanding to various degrees into telecom value-added services, such as Shanda Interactive Entertainment Limited, which acquired a controlling stake in and subsequently acquired the assets of one of our competitors, Hurray! Holding Co., Ltd., in 2009, and Focus Media Holding Limited, which primarily focus on internet-based games and media advertising services, respectively, but which also offer wireless games and value-added services.
International wireless companies, such as Nokia, come2us and Cybird, and international internet portal operators, such as Yahoo!, Lycos and AOL, who are or may be attempting to enter the Chinese market could also present significant competition for us. These international competitors have had only limited success, however, in penetrating the Chinese telecom value-added services market to date.
Several of our competitors have longer operating histories in China, greater name and brand recognition, larger customer bases and databases, significantly greater financial, technological and marketing resources and superior access to original content than we have. As a result, our existing competitors may in the future achieve greater market acceptance and gain additional market share. In addition, it is possible that the operators could decide to provide their own portfolio of content and services to their users themselves and deny network access to third-party service providers such as our company.
54
Indonesia
In Indonesia, there are more than 200 content providers that provide content and services similar to our company. For example, some competitors offer a range of mobile value-added services which are similar to our services, while others offer just a single service that competes with our products. We believe that competition in this market has been intensifying due to, among other things, the fact that growth in demand for SMS programs generally has been decreasing, especially for SMS subscriptions and SMS quizzes, as the market matures.
We also face increased competition from the wider availability of mobile handsets that access the internet. Many internet / web portal providers offer content for free because they earn revenue from advertisers, not the content. In addition, other content providers may compete by developing mobile applications that can be downloaded for free or are already embedded into the handsets. The increasing number of mobile handsets with these capabilities presents greater competition to our business.
Singapore and Other Markets
Our competitors in Singapore in the edutainment and entertainment industry are Scorpio East Ltd, which is an exclusive licensee of Walt Disney Studios Home Entertainment, and HVN Berjaya, which holds an exclusive license from Paramount and Universal. In Malaysia, Speedy Entertainment and PMP are our main competitors. Speedy Entertainment holds an exclusive license from Warner Home Video Inc., Twentieth Century Fox, Paramount and Universal and is also the biggest retailer of audio/video products in Malaysia. PMP is the major distributor in Malaysia of most Asia content.
We also face competition from parallel imports from lower cost countries. These parallel imports are priced at 50% to 60% of our recommended retail price, and we estimate that sales of such parallel imports can amount to 30% to 40% of the total home entertainment consumption of VCDs/DVDs/Blu-ray discs in InnoForm’s markets. In certain Asian countries, competition may also arise from piracy or illegal downloads, which can represent a significant portion of the video market in those jurisdictions.
Several of our competitors have longer operating histories in the home entertainment and video business and stronger relationships with producers and licensors that give them superior access to content than we have. As a result, our existing competitors in this industry may in the future achieve greater market acceptance and gain additional market share. In addition, it is possible that our current relationships with content distributors may not provide us with access to the most profitable content, and our business could suffer as a result.
Please refer to Item 3.D. “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Business in China — We face intense competition in China” and “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Operations Outside of China — Our business has been adversely affected and will continue to be adversely affected if the operators continue to expand their own portfolio of telecom value-added services that compete with our services” and “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Operations Outside of China — Our expansion into the entertainment and edutainment products distribution market through our acquisition of InnoForm may not be successful” for a more detailed discussion of the risks we face from our competitors.
55
GOVERNMENT REGULATION
China
The following is a summary of the principal governmental laws and regulations that are or may be applicable to wireless service providers like us in China. The scope and enforcement of many of the laws and regulations described below are uncertain. We cannot predict the effect of further developments in the Chinese legal system, including the promulgation of new laws, changes to existing laws or the interpretation or enforcement of laws, particularly with regard to telecom value-added services, which is an emerging industry in China. For a description of the regulatory risks related to our business, please see Item 3.D. “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Business in China — Changes in the policies of the operators and in their enforcement of their policies have resulted in our company having to pay additional charges to the operators and have negatively affected our revenue. Further changes could materially and adversely impact our revenue, profitability and financial condition in the future;” “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Industry — The Chinese government or one or more of the operators may prevent us from distributing, and we may be subject to liability for, content that any of them believe is inappropriate;” “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Industry — Telecommunication laws and regulations in China are evolving and subject to interpretation and may change in the future. If we are found to be in violation of current or future Chinese laws or regulations, we could be subject to severe penalties;” “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Industry — The regulation of internet website operators is also unclear in China, and our business could be adversely affected if we are deemed to have violated applicable laws and regulations;” “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Operations Outside of China — Our corporate structure could be deemed to be in violation of current or future Chinese laws and regulations which could adversely affect our ability to operate our business effectively or at all;” and “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Doing Business in China — Chinese regulations relating to acquisitions of Chinese companies by foreign entities may limit our ability to acquire Chinese companies and adversely affect the implementation of our acquisition strategy as well as our business and prospects.”
Regulation of Telecommunication Services
The telecommunications industry, including certain telecom value-added services, is highly-regulated in China. Regulations issued or implemented by the State Council, the MII, and other relevant government authorities cover many aspects of telecommunications network operation, including entry into the telecommunications industry, the scope of permissible business activities, interconnection and transmission line arrangements, tariff policy and foreign investment.
The principal regulations governing the telecommunications services business in China include:
| • | | Telecommunications Regulations(2000), or the Telecom Regulations. The Telecom Regulations categorize all telecommunications businesses in China as either infrastructure telecommunications businesses or value-added telecommunications businesses. The latter category includes SMS and other telecom value-added services. Under the Telecom Regulations, certain services are classified as being of a value-added nature and require the commercial operator of such services to obtain an operating license, including telecommunication information services, online data processing and translation processing, call centers and internet access. The Telecom Regulations also set forth extensive guidelines with respect to different aspects of telecommunications operations in China. |
| • | | Regulations for the Administration of Foreign-Invested Telecommunications Enterprises(amended in 2008), or the FI Telecom Regulations. The FI Telecom Regulations set forth detailed requirements with respect to capitalization, investor qualifications and application procedures in connection with the establishment of a foreign-invested telecom enterprise. Under the FI Telecom Regulations, a foreign entity is prohibited from owning more than 50% of the total equity in any value-added telecommunications business in China. The FI Telecom Regulations were amended in 2008. A primary amendment relates to the registered capital of the foreign-invested enterprise engaging in infrastructure telecom business. For an enterprise engaging in infrastructure telecom business nationwide or beyond a single province, autonomous region or municipality, it must have a minimum registered capital of RMB1 billion. For an enterprise engaging in infrastructure telecom business within one province, autonomous region or municipality, it must have a minimum registered capital of RMB100 million. |
56
| • | | Administrative Measures for Telecommunications Business Operating Permit (effective on April 10, 2009), or the Telecom Permit Measures. The Telecom Permit Measures supersede the Administrative Measures for Telecommunications Business Operating License, or the Telecom License Measures (issued by the MII in 2001). The Telecom Permit Measures specifies, among others, the application, approval, modification and deregistration requirements in relation to telecom business operating licenses. In addition, the Telecom Permit Measures require that an approved value-added telecommunications service provider must conduct its business in accordance with the specifications recorded on its Telecom Business Operating License. |
Regulation of SMS Services. On April 29, 2004, the MII promulgated a Circular on Certain Issues regarding Standardization of SMS Services, or the Circular. The Circular requires all service providers to obtain appropriate operating licenses before they can provide telecom value-added services through the networks of the operators in China. Pursuant to the Circular, in the promotion of SMS services, mobile operators and service providers in China are required to prominently feature descriptions of standards and methods by which users will be charged for the services they order and how they may cancel their orders. Monthly subscriptions to SMS services must be specifically confirmed by users. Any message sent by a service provider to a user to confirm an order must include a schedule of charges applicable to the service such user has ordered. If the user does not confirm an order, the order is deemed cancelled. Providers of SMS services must provide such services strictly according to users’ orders, and may not alter the number of such SMS messages, the frequency at which the messages are sent, or the methods through which users pay for the services. The Circular also required mobile operators and service providers to implement a series of measures before May 15, 2004 that would make it easier for users to cancel their SMS services. If a user disputes any charges for SMS services or complains about the quality of the services, the operator is required to refund such user’s payment for the services if it is unable to assign responsibility for the problem to another party within 15 days. In addition, service providers are required to review the content in the process of collecting, developing, processing and sending any message. The message must not contain any content prohibited by the state. Provisions in this Circular apply to SMS services provided by fixed line operators as well.
On March 13, 2005, the MII promulgated the Telecommunications Service Standards, or the Standards. The Standards contain the minimum quality standards for telecommunication services to be provided to customers, with detailed and specific standards for each category of telecommunication services. Schedule 6 of the Standards sets forth requirements that shall be observed in providing information services, including voice messages and SMS services. The requirements applicable to SMS services contained in Schedule 6 have largely repeated those contained in the Circular, with additional requirements, among others, that an SMS service provider shall ensure a 95% accuracy rate for the message transmission and that the SMS service provider shall set up a publicly available hotline for customer service.
While we believe this focus on compliance and service initiatives will result in a stronger, more orderly market in the long-term, it has also resulted in service and billing suspensions and in our having to pay certain charges to the operators for our inadvertent contravention of the foregoing rules and the operators’ own policies. We continuously monitor our SMS services in order to minimize the possibility of a violation of the Circular and the Standards.
In addition to regulations promulgated at the national level by the Chinese government, local offices of the MII, have issued provisional regulations requiring SMS service providers to obtain licenses from or register with it before providing SMS service within the city. Our affiliates, Unilink, Weilan, Cosmos, Zhong Tong, Lian Fei, Qimingxing, Beijing Ojava and Lianyu hold inter-provincial value-added telecommunication services licenses issued by the MII.
57
Regulation of Internet Culture Activities. On May 10, 2003, the Ministry of Culture of the PRC, or MOC, promulgated the Internet Culture Administration Tentative Measures, or the Internet Culture Measures, which became effective as of July 1, 2003. The Internet Culture Measures require internet culture operating entities,i.e., internet content providers which engage in internet culture activities, to obtain an Internet Culture Operating License from the MOC in accordance with the Internet Culture Measures. The term “internet culture activities” includes, among other things, acts of online dissemination of internet cultural products, such as audio-visual products, game products, performances of plays or programs, works of art and cartoons, and the production, reproduction, importation, sale (wholesale or retail), leasing and broadcasting of internet cultural products. The Internet Culture Measures were amended by the MOC on February 17, 2011 which amendment became effective on April 1, 2011. The amendment primarily relates to the registered capital of internet culture operating entities. An internet culture operating entity must have a minimum registered capital of RMB 1 million, and an internet culture operating entity must have a minimum registered capital of RMB 10 million to be allowed to engage in online games business activities. It is also specifically provided by the amended Internet Culture Measures that the phrase “internet culture activities” includes dissemination of culture products through any wireless technologies. Unilink and Yuan Hang have acquired this license.
On November 20, 2006, the Ministry of Culture issued Several Suggestions of the Ministry of Culture on the Development and Administration of the Internet Music, or the Suggestions, which became effective on November 20, 2006. The Suggestions, among other things, reiterate the requirement for the internet service provider to obtain the Internet Culture Operating License to carry on any business of internet music products. In addition, foreign investors are prohibited from engaging in the internet culture business operation.
On August 18, 2009, the PRC Ministry of Culture promulgated the Notice on Strengthening and Improving the Content Review of Online Music. According to this notice, only “internet culture operating entities” approved by the Ministry of Culture may engage in the production, release, dissemination (including providing direct links to music products) and importation of online music products. Internet culture operating entities should establish strict self-monitoring system of online music content and set up special department in charge of such monitoring.
Other Laws and their Application
Regulation of Information Security.Internet content in China is also regulated and restricted. The National People’s Congress, China’s national legislative body, adopted and amended the Decision of Maintaining Security on the internet on December 28, 2000 and in August 2009, respectively, which provides that any of the following conduct may result in criminal punishment:
| • | | gaining improper entry into a computer or system of strategic importance; |
| • | | disseminating politically disruptive information; |
| • | | spreading false commercial information; |
| • | | infringing intellectual property rights; |
58
| • | | spreading computer viruses; |
| • | | spreading false financial news or information; |
| • | | spreading obscene content. |
The Ministry of Public Security has promulgated measures that prohibit use of the internet in ways which, among other things, result in a leakage of State secrets or a spread of socially destabilizing content. The Ministry of Public Security has supervision and inspection powers in this regard, and we may be subject to the jurisdiction of the local security bureaus.
In addition,the newly amended Law on Preservation of State Secrets which became effective on October 1, 2010 provides that whenever an internet service provider detects any leakage of state secrets in the distribution of online information, it should stop the distribution of such information and report to the authorities of state security and public security. As requested by the authorities of state security, public security or state secrecy, the internet service provider should delete any contents on its website that may lead to disclosure of state secrets. Failure to do so on a timely and adequate basis may subject us to liability and certain penalties imposed by the State Security Bureau, Ministry of Public Security and/or MII or their respective local counterparts.
Regulation of Internet Content Services.The Measures for the Administration of Internet Information Services, or the ICP Measures, went into effect on September 25, 2000 and was amended on January 8, 2011. Under the ICP Measures, any entity providing information to online internet users must obtain an operating license from MII or its local branch at the provincial level in accordance with the Telecom Regulations described above. The ICP Measures further stipulate that entities providing online information services in areas of news, publishing, education, medicine, health, pharmaceuticals and medical equipment must obtain permission from responsible national authorities prior to applying for an operating license from MII or its local branch at the provincial or municipal level. Moreover, ICPs must display their operating license numbers in a conspicuous location on their websites. ICPs must police their websites to remove categories of harmful content that are broadly defined. This obligation reiterates internet content restrictions set by other ministries over the past few years.
As a telecom value-added services provider, we do not engage in the internet portal business which typically involves the provision of extensive internet content services, including Chinese language web navigational and search capabilities, content channels, web-based communications and community services and a platform for e-commerce, such as auction houses. Weilan registered with the Shanghai Telecommunication Administration Bureau in November 2003 to provide commercial services, which are generally limited to the marketing and sales of our telecom value-added services, at our websites.
As a commercial ICP provider, we are prohibited from posting or displaying any content that:
| • | | opposes the fundamental principles determined in China’s Constitution; |
| • | | compromises state security, divulges state secrets, subverts state power or damages national unity; |
| • | | harms the dignity or interests of the state; |
| • | | incites ethnic hatred or racial discrimination or damages inter-ethnic unity; |
59
| • | | sabotages China’s religious policy or propagates heretical teachings or feudal superstitions; |
| • | | disseminates rumors, disturbs social order or disrupts social stability; |
| • | | propagates obscenity, pornography, gambling, violence, murder or fear or incites the commission of crimes; |
| • | | insults or slanders a third party or infringes upon the lawful rights and interests of a third party; or |
| • | | includes other content prohibited by laws or administrative regulations. |
Failure to comply with these prohibitions may result in the closing of our websites.
Regulation of Foreign Direct Investment in Internet and Telecommunications Businesses.On July 13, 2006, the MII issued a notice with the purpose of increasing the regulation of foreign investment in and operations of telecom value-added services which includes internet and telecommunications businesses in China. The regulations require Chinese entities (or shareholders of such Chinese entities) to own and control the internet domain names and registered trademarks, and to have servers and other equipment used to host and operate websites and conduct business. The ownership requirements functionally limit foreign direct and indirect ownership and control of the intellectual property of these businesses even when attempted through various parallel control, licensing, use and management agreements. Failure to comply may cause the MII to terminate a telecommunications license or otherwise modify existing agreements or require the disposition of the assets by the foreign entity.
Regulation of News Dissemination through SMS Services.On November 16, 2000, the Interim Measures on the Administration of Internet Websites’ Engagement in News Publication Services, or the Internet News Measures, were promulgated by the State Council News Office and the MII. These measures stipulate that general websites established by non-news organizations may publish news released by certain official news agencies if such websites satisfy the requirements set forth in Article 9 of the measures and have acquired the requisite approval, but may not publish news items produced by themselves or news sources from elsewhere. All the news that we publish and disseminate originates from official news agencies approved by the PRC government.
On September 25, 2005, the State Council News Office and the MII jointly promulgated the Regulations on Administration of Internet News Services, or the Internet News Regulations. According to the Internet News Regulations, all companies not established by news organizations that intend to carry on dissemination of news on major political, economic, military and diplomatic events must obtain approval from the State Council News Office and must satisfy the minimum requirements of a registered capital of no less than RMB10,000,000 and other requirements relating to internal control systems and competent personnel in respect of such company.
The State Council News Office and the MII have not specified whether the Internet News Measures and the Internet News Regulations apply to dissemination of news through SMS, MMS, WAP, Javagames or other wireless technologies. In addition, pursuant to a circular issued by the Shanghai Communications Administration, distribution of news contents through wireless applications such as SMS must be approved by relevant government agencies in charge.
60
Regulation of Online Publication. The State News and Publications Administration, or SNPA, is the government agency responsible for regulating publishing activities in China. On June 27, 2002, the MII and SNPA jointly promulgated the Tentative Internet Publishing Administrative Measures, or the Internet Publishing Measures, which took effect on August 1, 2002. The Internet Publishing Measures require internet publishers to secure approval from SNPA. The term “internet publishing” is defined as an act of online dissemination whereby internet information service providers select, edit and process works created by themselves or others (including content from books, newspapers, periodicals, audio and video products, electronic publications, and other sources that have already been formally published or works that have been made public in other media) and subsequently post the same on the internet or transmit the same to users via the internet for browsing, use or downloading by the public.
SNPA and the MII have not specified whether the aforementioned approval in the Internet Publishing Measures is applicable to dissemination of works through SMS, MMS, WAP, Javagames or other wireless technologies. If, in the future, SNPA and the MII clarify that the Internet Publishing Measures are applicable to telecom value-added telecommunications services operators or issue new regulations or rules regulating wireless publishing, we may need to apply for a license or permit from governmental agencies in charge of publishing. We cannot assure you that such application would be approved by the relevant governmental agencies.
SNPA and the State Administration of Copyright issued the Circular of Implementation of the Decision of the State Council on Authority of Approval of Publication of Electronic and Internet Game Products, or the Game Publication Circular, on July 27, 2004. Pursuant to the Game Publication Circular, internet game publication products include game software that can be reviewed, used or downloaded by mobile phones through the internet. Importation of internet game publication products must be approved by the provincial government agencies in charge of publication and then approved by SNPA.
Regulations of Copyrights Relating to Online Transmissions.The National People’s Congress adopted the Copyright Law in 1990 and amended it in 2001 and 2010, respectively. The amended Copyright Law extends copyright protection to internet activities, products disseminated over the internet and software products.
According to the Measures for the Administrative Protection of Internet Copyright implemented on May 30, 2005, acts of automatically providing functions such as uploading, storing, linking or searching works, audio or video products, or other contents through the internet based on the instruction of an internet content provider, without editing, amending or selecting any stored or transmitted content, and other acts of providing internet information services shall be governed by the Copyright Law. A copyright administration department shall, when imposing administrative penalties upon the act infringing upon the right of communication through information network, apply the Measures for Imposing Copyright Administrative Penalties.
Where a copyright holder (individual or entity) finds any content communicated through the internet infringes upon its copyright and sends a notice of claim to the internet information service provider, the internet information service provider shall immediately take measures to remove the relevant contents, and preserve the copyright holder’s notice of claim for six months. An internet information service provider shall, after receipt of the copyright holder’s notice, record the contents of the provided information, the publishing time, and the internet address or domain name. Where an internet information service provider removes relevant content of an internet content provider according to the notice of a copyright holder, the internet content provider may deliver a counter-notice to both the internet information service provider and the copyright holder, stating that the removed contents do not infringe upon the copyright. After the delivery of such counter-notice, the internet information service provider may immediately reinstate the removed contents and shall not bear legal liability for such reinstatement.
61
Where an internet information service provider clearly knows an internet content provider infringes other’s copyright through the internet, or, although it does not clearly know such activity but fails to take measures to remove relevant contents upon receipt of the copyright owner’s notice, as a result, it damages public interests, the copyright administration department may, in accordance with the Copyright Law, order it to stop the tortious act, and impose administrative penalties. Where there is no evidence to indicate that an internet information service provider clearly knows the facts of tort, or the internet information service provider has taken measures to remove relevant contents upon receipt of the copyright owner’s notice, the internet information service provider shall not bear the relevant liabilities.
On May 18, 2006, the State Council issued the Regulations on Protection of Information Online Transmission Rights, or the Online Transmission Regulations, which came into effect on July 1, 2006. The Online Transmission Regulations provide that a copyright owner’s right to transmit intellectual property including works, performances, and video and audio products via electronic networks which include fixed line and mobile networks, or the Transmission Rights, are protected, and third parties may not transmit any of such intellectual property through electronic networks without first obtaining consent from the relevant copyright owner, except in circumstances where the use of such intellectual property would be considered as fair use.
On December 26, 2009, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress adopted the Torts Liability Law, which became effective on July 1, 2010. Under this new law, both internet users and internet service providers may be liable for the wrongful acts of users who infringe the lawful rights of other parties. If an internet user utilizes internet services to commit a tortious act, the party whose rights are infringed may request the internet service provider to take measures, such as removing or blocking the content, or disabling the links to such content, to prevent or stop the infringement. If the internet service provider does not take necessary measures after receiving such notice, it shall be jointly liable for any further damages suffered by the rights holder. Furthermore, if an internet service provider fails to take necessary measures when it knows that an internet user utilizes its internet services to infringe the lawful rights and interests of other parties, it shall be jointly liable with the internet user for damages resulting from the infringement.
Regulation of Advertisements.The State Administration of Industry and Commerce, or the SAIC, is the government agency responsible for regulating advertising activities in China. The SAIC has not promulgated regulations specifically aimed at wireless advertising through a media other than the internet, such as through SMS services. However, one provisional regulation issued by the Shanghai Communication Administration prohibits service providers from sending SMS advertisements without the client’s consent.
On January 26, 2005, the SAIC and the MII jointly promulgated the Circular Regarding the Prohibition of Advertisements for Voice Messages, SMS and other Information Services Which Contain Unhealthy Content (the “SMS Advertising Circular”). The SMS Advertising Circular prohibits advertisement of information services with pornographic, obscene, superstitious and other unhealthy content, or advertisements that are misleading in pricing and payment terms of information services. The SMS Advertising Circular further provides that information service providers and advertising companies involved in the dissemination of advertisements for information services with pornographic, obscene, superstitious and other unhealthy content, or advertisements that are misleading in pricing and payment terms of information services will be subject to penalties by relevant authorities pursuant to PRC advertising regulations, and that information service providers providing unhealthy contents will be subject to administrative and other measures by telecommunications authorities, the public security authorities and national security authorities in accordance with Telecommunications Regulations (2000) and other applicable laws and regulations.
62
As part of our non-mobile operator marketing activities, we have developed integrated marketing campaigns with traditional media companies and multinational corporations through certain cross-selling efforts. If the SAIC were to treat our integrated marketing campaigns or other activities as being advertising activities, we would need to apply to the local SAIC agencies where such advertising activity was being conducted to expand our business scope to include the advertising business. In addition, we also may need to set up subsidiaries or branches (with advertising included in the business scope prescribed on such subsidiary or branch business licenses) or hire local qualified agents in those cities where we expand our advertising activities. We cannot assure you that such applications to expand our business scope or to set up local subsidiaries or branches, if it becomes necessary for our integrated marketing campaigns, would be approved by the SAIC. Conducting business beyond our approved business scope may subject us to penalties including being banned from engaging in online advertising activities and confiscation of illegal earnings and fines.
Regulation of Online Game Products. The MOC regulates online game products. According to the Internet Culture Measures (as amended by the MOC on February 17, 2011 and effective on April 1, 2011), the importation of online game products shall be approved by the MOC. Failure to obtain such approval would be subject to penalties, including being banned from operating online game products and public censure.
On May 14, 2004, the MOC promulgated a Circular on Strengthening Censorship of Content of Online Game Products, or the Online Game Circular, which is applicable to online game products disseminated through either internet or wireless (mobile) networks. The Online Game Circular requires all entities operating imported online game products to obtain an Internet Culture Operating License issued by the MOC, which will strictly examine the content of any online game products to be imported. Any imported online game product, as well as any material upgrades or software patches, must be reviewed by the MOC (specifically by its Content Censorship Committee for Imported Online Game Products) before such products may begin operation. Unilink and Yuan Hang each has already acquired an Internet Culture Operating License from the MOC. On March 1, 2009, the MII issued the Administrative Measures for Software Products, or the Software Products Measures, which came into effect on April 10, 2009. Under the Software Products Measures, entities or individuals are not permitted to develop, produce, sell, import or export any software products that infringe upon intellectual property of others, contain computer virus, may harm the security of computer system, do not meet the software standards in the PRC, or contain contents banned by any law or administrative regulation. Software products referred to in the Software Products Measures include computer software, software embedded in information system or equipment, and computer software offered together with technical services with respect to computer information system integration or application. If our online game products are considered as software products under the Software Products Measures, we are subject to the regulations of the Software Products Measures.
On November 13, 2009, the Ministry of Culture of the People’s Republic of China (MCPRC) issued another Circular of the Ministry of Culture on Improving and Strengthening the Examination of Content of Online Games. According to this circular, promotion and advertisement of online games which is vulgar, games propagating eroticism, gambling, violence, online games without the approval from MCPRC, and so on, are strictly prohibited.
63
On September 28, 2009, GAPP, the National Copyright Administration and the National Office of Combating Pornography and Illegal Publications jointly published the Notice Regarding the Consistent Implementation of the “Stipulations on ‘Three Provisions’ of the State Council and the Relevant Interpretations of the State Commission Office for Public Sector Reform and the Further Strengthening of the Administration of Pre-examination and Approval of Internet Games and the Examination and Approval of Imported Internet Games”, or Circular 13. Circular 13 expressly prohibits foreign investors from participating in internet game operating business via wholly owned, equity joint venture or cooperative joint venture investments in China, and from controlling and participating in such businesses directly or indirectly through contractual or technical support arrangements. It is not clear yet as to whether other PRC government authorities, such as MOFCOM and MII, will support GAPP to enforce the prohibition of the VIE model that Circular 13 contemplates.
In addition, for imported online games, the relevant license agreements for such games are regarded as copyright import contracts and need to be registered with the MOC and the State Copyright Bureau, otherwise we can not remit licensing fees out of China to the foreign game licensor.
On March 6, 2010, the MOC issued the Interim Measures on Administration of Online Games, or the Online Game Measures, which became effective on August 1, 2010. Under the Online Game Measures, any entity that engages in the online games business, issuance of virtual currency or provision of virtue currency transaction services must have a minimum registered capital of RMB 10 million and obtain an Internet Culture Operating License from the provincial counterpart of the MOC.
The Online Game Measures impose restrictions on the content of online games and the MOC is in charge of the content review. For the online games developed within the PRC, the online game operators are required to complete filing procedures with the MOC, and indicate the filing numbers at the designated places of their websites and in the games. Online game operators are also required to establish self-censorship systems and to appoint dedicated personnel for the self-censorship to ensure the legitimacy of the content of the online games.
The Online Game Measures require the online game operators to formulate user guidance and warning information regarding the online games, and indicate such information at a conspicuous place of their websites and in the games. The MOC has formulated the Essential Clauses of the Standard Agreement for Online Game Services, or Essential Clauses. The Online Game Measures require that the service agreement entered into between an online game operator and a user include all the Essential Clauses. Online game operators are also required to take technical and managerial measures to ensure online information security, including measures to prevent computer virus invasion, attack or damage, to back up important data and save user registration information, operating information, maintenance logs and other information, as well as measures to protect State secrecy, trade secret and users’ personal information.
Foreign Exchange Controls
Our subsidiaries and Chinese affiliates are subject to various foreign exchange controls which are discussed in Item 10.D. “Additional Information—Exchange Controls” and Item 3.D. “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Doing Business in China — Chinese regulations relating to acquisitions of Chinese companies by foreign entities may limit our ability to acquire Chinese companies and adversely affect the implementation of our acquisition strategy as well as our business and prospects.”
64
SAFE Regulations on Mergers and Acquisitions and Employee Stock Options
On October 21, 2005, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, or SAFE, issued Relevant Issues Concerning Foreign Exchange Control on Domestic Residents’ Corporate Financing and Roundtrip Investment through Offshore Special Purpose Vehicles, or Circular 75, which became effective as of November 1, 2005. Under Circular 75, PRC residents, who use assets or equity interests in their PRC entities as capital contributions to establish offshore companies or inject assets or equity interests of their PRC entities into offshore companies to raise capital overseas, are required to register with local SAFE branches with respect to their overseas investments in offshore companies. PRC residents are also required to file amendments to their registrations if their offshore companies experience material events involving capital variation, such as changes in share capital, share transfers, mergers and acquisitions, spin-off transactions, long-term equity or debt investments or uses of assets in the PRC to guarantee offshore obligations.
Under the relevant implementing rules of Circular 75, failure to comply with the registration procedures set forth in Circular 75 may result in restrictions on the foreign exchange activities of the relevant onshore company, including higher requirement for registered capital, restrictions on the payment of dividends and other distributions to its offshore parent or affiliate and the capital inflow from the offshore entity, and may also subject relevant PRC residents to penalties under the applicable PRC foreign exchange administration regulations.
In December 2006, the People’s Bank of China, or PBOC, promulgated the Administrative Measures for Individual Foreign Exchange, which set forth the respective requirements for foreign exchange transactions by PRC individuals under either the current account or the capital account. The Implementation Rules of the Administrative Measures for Individual Foreign Exchange, issued in January 2007 by SAFE, specify the approval requirements for PRC citizens who are granted shares or share options by an overseas listed company according to its employee stock ownership plan or stock option plan.
In March 2007, SAFE promulgated the Processing Guidance on Foreign Exchange Administration for Domestic Individuals Participating in Employee Stock Holding Plans or Stock Option Plans of Overseas-Listed Companies, or the Share Option Plan. According to the Share Option Plan, PRC citizens who are granted shares or share options by an overseas listed company according to its employee share option or share incentive plan are required, through the PRC subsidiary of such overseas listed company or other qualified PRC agents, to register with SAFE and complete certain other procedures related to the share option or other share incentive plan. Foreign exchange income from the sale of shares or dividends distributed by the overseas listed company may be converted into Renminbi or transferred to the employees’ individual foreign exchange savings account after such foreign exchange income is remitted into China. In addition, the overseas listed company or its PRC subsidiary or other qualified PRC agent is required to appoint an asset manager or administrator, appoint a custodian bank and open dedicated foreign currency accounts to handle transactions relating to the share option scheme or other share incentive plan. We and our PRC citizen employees who have been and will be granted share options, or PRC option holders, are subject to these rules. If we or our PRC option holders fail to comply with these rules, we or our PRC option holders may be subject to fines and legal or administrative sanctions.
In addition, the General Administration of Taxation has issued a few circulars concerning employee stock options. Under these circulars, our employees working in China who exercise stock options will be subject to PRC individual income tax. Our subsidiaries have obligations to file documents related to employee stock options with relevant tax authorities and withhold individual income taxes of those employees who exercise their stock options. If our employees fail to pay and we fail to withhold their income taxes, we may face sanctions imposed by tax authorities or any other PRC government authorities.
65
On January 7, 2009, the Ministry of Finance and the General Administration of Taxation jointly issued the Notice on the Issues Concerning Levy of Individual Income Tax on Income from Stock Appreciation Rights and Restricted Stock. According to this notice, the calculation and levy of individual income tax on the income of individuals from the exercise of stock appreciation rights and restricted shares in listed companies (whether in China or abroad) shall refer to the relevant Chinese regulations on levy of individual income tax on income from stock options. The term “stock appreciation right” refers to the right, granted by a listed company to its employees, to receive proceeds from price rise of a prescribed number of stocks over a specific period of time in the future and under the agreed conditions. The term “restricted stock” refers to a prescribed number of shares granted by a listed company to its employees under the conditions agreed to in an equity incentive plan. If the stock appreciation right or other rights under our stock plans are considered to be within the scope of this notice, our employees will be subject to individual income tax for their income from the exercise of the stock appreciation right or other rights under our stock plans.
Mergers and Acquisitions Rules
On August 8, 2006, MOFCOM, CSRC and four other PRC authorities at the state level promulgated the M&A Rules, which came into effect on September 8, 2006 and were amended in June 2009.
Under the M&A Rules, equity or assets merger and acquisition of PRC enterprises by foreign investors shall be subject to the approval from MOFCOM or its competent local branches. In particular, a share swap between a foreign investor and a PRC enterprise shall be subject to the approval of MOFCOM, and the share swap would not be approved unless such foreign investor is a listed company or an offshore special purpose vehicle, or SPV. As defined in the M&A Rules, an SPV is an offshore company that is directly or indirectly, established or controlled by PRC entities or individuals for the purposes of an overseas listing. In addition, the listing of the SPV shall be completed within one year after the issuing date of the business license of the PRC enterprise acquired by the SPV.
Under the M&A Rules, the listing of an SPV is subject to prior approval of CSRC. On September 21, 2006, CSRC promulgated Guidelines on Domestic Enterprises Indirectly Issuing or Listing and Trading Their Stocks on Overseas Stock Exchanges, which emphasize that SPVs referred to in the M&A Rules are subject to CSRC approval.
Labor Contract Law and the Implementing Regulations
In June 2007, the National People’s Congress of China enacted the Labor Contract Law, which became effective on January 1, 2008. The Implementing Regulations of the PRC Employment Contracts Law, or the Implementing Regulations, was subsequently promulgated and became effective on September 18, 2008. Compared to the Labor Law, the Labor Contract Law and the Implementing Regulations establish more restrictions and increases costs for employers, including specific provisions related to fixed-term employment contracts, temporary employment, probation, consultation with the labor union and employee assembly, employment without a contract, dismissal of employees, compensation upon termination and overtime work, and collective bargaining. According to the Labor Contract Law and the Implementing Regulations, an employer is obliged to sign labor contract with unlimited term with an employee if the employer continues to hire the employee after the expiration of two consecutive fixed-term labor contracts. The employer has to compensate the employee upon the expiration of a fixed-term labor contract, unless the employee refuses to renew such contract on terms the same as or better than those contained in the expired contract. The employer also has to indemnify an employee if the employer terminates a labor contract without a cause permitted by law. In addition, under the Regulations on Paid Annual Leave for Employees, which became effective on January 1, 2008, employees who have served more than one year for an employer are entitled to a paid vacation ranging from five to 15 days, depending on their length of service. Employees who waive such vacation time at the request of employers shall be compensated for three times their regular salaries for each waived vacation day. In December 2007, we performed an internal review of our human resource policies and employment contracts with our employees including part time employees and took all steps necessary to comply with the Labor Contract Law and the Implementing Regulations. Implementation of the Labor Contract Law and the Implementing Regulations has increased and may further increase our operating expenses and have material adverse effect on our results of operations.
66
Indonesia
The following is a summary of the principal governmental laws and regulations that are or may be applicable to wireless service providers like us in Indonesia. The scope and enforcement of many of the laws described below are uncertain. If we are found to be in violation of current or future Indonesian laws or regulations, we could be subject to severe penalties, which could materially and adversely impact our revenue, profitability and financial condition in the future.
Telecommunication Industry Related Regulations
In general, telecommunication business activities in Indonesia are regulated by Law Number 36 of 1999 on Telecommunication and its implementing regulations, including Government Regulation Number 52 of 2000 on Telecommunication Operation. The implementing regulations categorize all telecommunication operations as one of three categories: (i) a telecommunication network operation, (ii) a telecommunication service operation, or (iii) a special telecommunication operation. The second category, the telecommunication service operation, consists of three types of activities: basic telephony service operation, value-added telephony service and multimedia services.
Value-added telephony service is the provision of telecommunication services that offers value-added services such as: (i) premium calls, (ii) calling cards, (iii) virtual private phone numbers, (iv) public phone recording, (v) store and forward, (vi) a call center and (vii) content services (e.g., ring tones, SMS and premium messaging). An operator of value-added telephony services who provides content services must comply with the Regulation of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number: 01/PER/M.Kominfo/01/2009 in terms of the availability of a call center and the mechanisms for activation or deactivation of service.
Licensing of Value-Added Service. A company commencing operations in value-added telephony service must first obtain a principal license during its pre-operation activities. The principal license is issued for a period of one year and may be extended once for a maximum of six months. Prior to 30 business days before the expiration of the principal license, the principal license holder must submit an application to the Directorate General of Communication and Information Technology to participate in an operation feasibility test. The test is conducted by a government accredited test institution. Once the principal license holder has passed the test, the Director General will issue a Statement of Feasibility Operation, at which point the principal license holder may submit an application to receive an operation license. Operation licenses are granted without duration, subject to regular evaluation.
A service operator with an operation license in good standing is required to pay a fee of telecommunication operation rights, or the BHP Telecommunication, in the amount of 0.50% of its annual gross revenue. This BHP Telecommunication is paid to the State Account maintained in the Director General of Post and Telecommunication.
Premium Messaging Service and SMS/MMS. Pursuant to the Regulation of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number: 01/PER/M.Kominfo/01/2009, operators of premium messaging services will provide such services in cooperation with telecommunication network operators who carry out basic telephone services after registration with the Regulatory Body of Information Technology. An operator of premium messaging services must use a certain access number regulated in the agreement between itself and the network operator.
67
Premium messaging is carried out by subscription or non-subscription. Operators of premium messaging must pay BHP Telecommunication tariffs and other fees based on the relevant implementing government regulations.
Operators of premium messaging must make available a call center with a specific number which is accessible 24 hours each day. The call center must provide first line support to handle queries, complains or requests. Operators of premium messaging by subscription must provide information of subscription activation as well as deactivation. Deactivation requests shall be made through SMS, MMS or the call center.
Senders of broadcast SMS/MMS are prohibited from sending messages that conflict with the public interest, decency standards or national security interests or that may disrupt public order. The broadcast sender is also required to allow the receiver of the message an option or method to reject subsequent messages from the broadcast sender.
Color Ring Back Tone. CRBT content providers are also deemed to be premium messaging operators since activation requests through SMS or MMS charge a premium tariff. Accordingly, CRBT content providers are subject to the same regulatory requirements as premium messaging operators detailed above.
Wireless Access Protocol. Currently there is no specific regulation available which governs the implementation of Wireless Access Protocol for content operators for an operator of value-added telephony services who provides content services.
Internet Content Regulation
Internet content in Indonesia is regulated and restricted. Under Law Number 11 of 2008 on Information and Electronic Transactions, internet content or electronic documents must not contain any of the following content:
| • | | any content that is against moral decency; |
| • | | humiliation or defamation; |
| • | | threats or blackmail; or |
| • | | any content that causes hatred for a certain group or intergroup of community based on tribe, race or religion. |
All individuals or legal entities are prohibited from distributing, transmitting or making available access to such content. Violation of the above prohibitions may subject an individual or legal entity (or the authorized representative of the legal entity) to criminal sanction, including imprisonment and fines, and other penalties.
Intellectual Property Rights
Copyright. Indonesia grants intellectual property rights under certain conditions. Under the Copy Rights Law Number 19 of 2002, a violation of another person’s copyright includes:
| • | | making copies, publishing a product or granting permission to make copies or to publish a product without consent from the author; |
68
| • | | broadcasting, exhibiting, distributing or selling to the public works or goods resulting from infringement of the copyright; |
| • | | reproducing without consent from the author a computer program for commercial purposes; and |
| • | | omitting the name of the author on his work, changing the content of the work, the title, subtitle or the name of the author without consent from the author. |
Investment Related Regulations
A foreign investor which intends to establish a business in Indonesia must comply with certain regulations related to the investment sector. Currently, investment activities in Indonesia are coordinated and supervised by the Indonesia Investment Coordinating Board (BKPM).
Negative List of Investments. Investment activities in Indonesia are regulated by Law No. 25 of 2007 on Investments and the Regulation of the President No. 36 of 2010 on the List of the Lines of Business which are Closed and Open with Certain Requirements Related to Investments, which does not limit the maximum foreign ownership of a company that conducts business in the value-added telephony service industry. However, a foreign-owned company conducting business as a value-added telephony service operator must cooperate with an Indonesian legal entity in conducting business activities in Indonesia. This cooperation may be evidenced by agreement entered into between the parties.
Investment License.Pursuant to the Regulation of the Chairman of BKPM No. 12 of 2009 on Guidelines and Provisions on Investment Applications, foreign investment companies must first secure an investment license (Izin Usaha) in order to commence operational activities in activities open for foreign investment. This investment license is valid as long as the relevant holder carries out its business activities.
M&A Regulation
Mergers and acquisitions are governed by the Indonesian Company Law Number 40 of 2007 and the implementing regulations in Government Regulation No. 27 of 1998. Based on the Company Law, the details of the merger or acquisition, or the M&A Plan, must be published in at least one newspaper and notice must be sent to employees of the company at least 30 days before the notice of the General Meeting of Shareholders (“GMS”). Another newspaper publication will be required at least 30 days prior to the effective date of the merger or acquisition. Within 14 days from such announcement, creditors are entitled to file objection to the company over the proposed merger or acquisition. Creditor objections will be resolved by the board of directors. However, if creditor objections are not resolved by the date of the GMS, such objections will be submitted to the shareholders for decision. The M&A Plan approved by the GMS will be stated in a deed issued by a notary public. If the company is a foreign investment company, the merger or acquisition must be approved by BKPM.
Mergers and acquisitions must also comply with Law Number 5 of 1999 on Prohibition of Monopoly Practice and Unfair Business Competition (“Anti-Monopoly Law”). The law prohibits acts or behavior involving an abuse of a market dominant position and generally forbids a business participant from taking direct or indirect advantage of a domination position to set trade terms with an aim to (i) prevent or restrict consumers access to competitor’s products, (ii) restrict development of technology or (iii) restrict a potential competitor from entering the market. A dominant position is defined as (a) a business participant or a group of business participants having at least 50% of the relevant market share or (b) two or three groups of business participants having at least 75% of the relevant market share. Article 28 of the Anti-Monopoly Law generally prohibits business participants from conducting mergers, consolidations or acquisitions with business entities resulting in monopolistic practices or unfair business competition. This article also includes post-notification requirement to the Business Competition Supervisory Commission if the merger, consolidation or acquisition results in a valuation of assets or an amount of sales exceeding a particular amount.
69
Foreign Exchange Control
Currently, based on Law No. 24 of 1999, dated May 17, 1999 on Foreign Exchange Traffic and Exchange Rate System, Indonesia has limited foreign exchange controls. Since most foreign exchange controls were abolished in 1971, the rupiah has been, and in general is, freely convertible. A number of regulations, however, have an impact on the exchange system. Bank Indonesia holds the authority to issue rupiah currency and has the responsibility for maintaining the stability of the rupiah. In order to maintain stability of the rupiah and prevent speculation by non-residents, Bank Indonesia has introduced regulations to restrict the movement of rupiah from (i) banks within Indonesia to offshore banks or to an offshore branch or office of an Indonesian bank or (ii) any investment denominated in rupiah with foreign parties and/or Indonesian parties domiciled or permanently residing outside Indonesia (without underlying trade or investment reasons), both of which thereby limit offshore trading to existing sources of liquidity. For example, only banks are authorized to deal in foreign exchange and execute exchange transactions related to the import and export of goods. In addition, Indonesian banks (including branches of foreign banks in Indonesia) are required to report to Bank Indonesia any fund transfers exceeding US$10,000. In addition, Bank Indonesia has the authority to request information and data concerning foreign currency activities of all people and legal entities that are domiciled, or who plan to reside in Indonesia for at least one year. Bank Indonesia’s regulations also require resident banks and companies that have total assets or total annual gross revenues of 100 billion rupiah or more to report all data concerning their foreign currency activities to Bank Indonesia (for example, insurance companies, finance companies or venture capital companies). However, if the transaction is conducted through a domestic bank and/or domestic non-bank financial institution, the requirement to report to Bank Indonesia applies instead to the relevant domestic banks or non-bank financial institution that carried out the transaction. The transactions that must be reported include receipt and payment of funds through bank accounts outside Indonesia.
Recently, however, there have been media reports that Bank Indonesia will announce measures on capital flows to control the frequent inflow and outflow of short-term funds. Accordingly, the imposition of foreign exchange controls in Indonesia is a possibility, but we cannot be sure when, or if, such controls will be imposed in the future.
70
C. Organizational Structure
For information on our organizational structure, see Item 4 “Information on the Company— History and Development of the Company” and Item 5. “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Our Corporate Structure” and “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Arrangements with Consolidated Affiliates.”
D. Property, Plant and Equipment
Our principal executive offices are located in Shanghai, where we currently lease approximately a total of 904 square meters under two lease agreements at a total effective annual rent of $0.3 million. One lease agreement for an area of 552 square meters will expire in November 2011 and the other lease agreement for an area of 352 square meters will expire in October 2013. Our primary branch office is located in Beijing, where we lease approximately 776 square meters under lease agreements that will expire in February 2012 at an effective annual rent of $0.2 million. We believe that we will be able to obtain adequate facilities, principally through the leasing of appropriate properties, to accommodate our future expansion plans. We also have other branch or representative offices in Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Hangzhou, Chengdu, Nanjing, Changsha, Shenyang, Jinan, Zhengzhou, Wuhan, Fuzhou, Hefei and Xi’an.
| | |
Item 4A. | | Unresolved Staff Comments |
Not Applicable.
| | |
Item 5. | | Operating and Financial Review and Prospects |
The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon and should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and their related notes included in this annual report. This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, including, without limitation, statements regarding our expectations, beliefs, intentions or future strategies that are signified by the words “expect”, “anticipate”, “intend”, “believe”, or similar language. All forward-looking statements included in this annual report are based on information available to us on the date hereof, and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. We caution you that our business and financial performance are subject to substantial risks and uncertainties.
72
Overview
We provide entertainment-oriented telecom value-added services to mobile and fixed-line phone users in China and Indonesia. Our revenue is primarily derived from the sale of various 2G and 2.5G data-related services, audio-related services, media content, mobile games and PC games.
Our data-related services include SMS (2G), MMS, WAP and Java games (2.5G), and our audio-related services include IVR and CRBT services. We provide such services to users through the mobile and fixed line networks operated by China Mobile, China Unicom and China Telecom, and we also recently commenced offering 2G, 2.5G and 3G services in Indonesia. We receive our revenue principally in the form of payments from the telecommunication network operators in these markets after the operators have deducted their service and network fees. Users pay for these services by monthly subscription and/or on a per usage basis.
Our media content revenue is generated from the distribution of VCDs, DVDs, Blu-ray discs and video-on-demand, as well as theatrical distribution and production investment in movies and karaoke video licensing, karaoke system rentals and a karaoke-on-demand channel on Pay-TV. We receive our revenue principally in the form of revenue sharing with the licensors for this content.
For 2010, we generated $71.7 million in gross revenue, compared to $62.2 million for 2009, representing an increase of 15.3%. The table below sets forth our gross revenue by service category in 2008, 2009 and 2010 (in millions of $):
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended December 31, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2010 | |
Data-related services | | | | | | | | | | | | |
China | | | 33.6 | | | | 34.0 | | | | 35.7 | |
Indonesia | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1.8 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | 33.6 | | | | 34.0 | | | | 37.5 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Audio-related services | | | | | | | | | | | | |
China | | | 28.1 | | | | 26.0 | | | | 18.7 | |
Indonesia | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | 28.1 | | | | 26.0 | | | | 18.7 | |
Media content | | | — | | | | — | | | | 12.2 | |
Mobile games | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2.0 | |
PC games | | | 2.0 | | | | 1.1 | | | | 1.3 | |
Others | | | 3.3 | | | | 1.1 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total revenue | | | 67.0 | | | | 62.2 | | | | 71.7 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
The major factors affecting our results of operations and financial condition include:
| • | | Changes in Mobile Operator Policies or the Manner in Which They are Enforced. The operators regularly introduce changes to their operating policies. For instance, in 2008, in order to improve its oversight of service providers, China Mobile started to rank SMS and IVR service providers based on certain performance criteria, and those service providers that fall into a lower rank are subject to restrictions in service fees they may charge. Furthermore, in 2010, China Mobile, China Unicom and China Telecom began requiring additional notices and confirmations to end consumers during the purchase of embedded services in mobile handsets, requiring that SMS short codes which are used for ordering VAS and other activities, such as voting in television program contests, be more tailored to the specific service offering or service partner. In addition, in that year, the operators in China imposed additional restrictions on IVR services offered in connection with interactive programs. Such policy changes by the mobile operators have negatively affected our revenue in the past. The telecom network operators may implement further measures in response to current or future policy directives of MII or due to changes in their internal management and control policies and procedures with respect to service providers such as our company, which may have a material negative impact on our business, results of operations and financial position. |
73
| • | | Operator Service Agreements.Our ability to generate revenue and the terms under which we deliver our services depend to a large extent on our ability to maintain good relationships with the national, provincial and local offices of China Mobile and to a lesser extent, China Unicom and China Telecom and to differentiate our services through, among other things, innovative product development and appealing content from domestic and international content providers. Each operator charges us service fees from the gross revenue generated by our services. In addition, to the extent the number of SMS or MMS messages sent by us over China Mobile’s network exceeds the number of SMS or MMS messages our customers send to us, we must also pay a per message network fee. We also pay China Unicom and China Telecom network fees in most provinces on the same basis. These service and network fees are reflected in our cost of revenue and totaled $16.3 million, $15.2 million and $13.1 million for 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively. Each operator could alter any of the terms of our service agreements with them or terminate the agreements for a variety of reasons in the future, including, for example, to increase their service or network fees to enhance their profitability at the expense of service providers. In addition, the future growth of our value-added services business in Indonesia will depend to a large extent on the terms of our agreements with the telecommunication operators in that market. |
|
| • | | Costs Associated with Content and Distribution Channel Provider Relationships. |
Telecommunication Value-added Services
| • | | Our telecom value-added services include the delivery of third-party content and services, such as certain Java games and music downloads for ringtones and CRBTs, to our end users. We also distribute some of our services via interactive programs broadcast over television and radio and through embedded menus in mobile handsets. We provide this content and services typically based on revenue-sharing arrangements under which we pay third-party content, interactive program providers and mobile handset manufacturers or designers (known as distribution channel providers) an agreed percentage of the revenue realized from services incorporating their content or embedded in their mobile handsets. Most of our content licenses or cooperation contracts with television and radio stations and mobile handset manufacturers or designers have a limited term. Given the high demand for engaging, trendy content in the markets in which we operate, we have limited leverage to negotiate significantly more favorable terms with these parties. Payments to third-party content and distribution channel providers were $17.4 million, $23.6 million and $24.2 million, representing 26.0%, 37.9% and 33.8% of our total value-added services revenue in 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively. Our net income could be adversely affected in future periods if revenue share payments continue to increase, either in absolute terms or as a percentage of our gross revenue. See Item 3.D. “Risk Factors — Risks Related to our Operations Outside of China — The success of some of our services is significantly dependent on our ability to obtain, customize and localize desirable content and technology from third parties and distribute our services effectively.” |
74
Media Content
| • | | InnoForm, our majority owned subsidiary, obtains all of its edutainment and entertainment content from third parties, including a number of major Hollywood and Asian production studios, including Twentieth Century Fox and Warner Home Video. Our contracts with these content providers involve minimum guarantee payments from InnoForm, which are payable in advance. Although competition in InnoForm’s markets has been intensifying, including from alternate sources of content such as video download websites, our cost of acquiring such content has been increasing in recent years which has, and may continue to, negatively impact the profitability this business. |
| • | | Marketing Expenses.In order to maintain visibility and demand for our SMS and IVR products and our competitive position in the market, we need to make continued investments in media advertising and integrated co-marketing. Our media advertising is typically in the form of television commercials and magazine, newspaper and website placements. Fee rates for our various marketing channels are becoming increasingly expensive while in some cases generating lower levels of gross revenue and thus negatively affecting our profit margin. Our advertising costs were $4.5 million, $3.6 million and $1.9 million in 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively. We continued to scale down our investment in marketing expenses in 2010 due to a disappointing rate of return from our marketing investments. Our net income could continue to be adversely affected in future periods if we are not able to effectively manage advertising expenses and maximize our return from our advertising spending. In addition, if we continue to curtail or cease our spending on media advertising in the future, we may not have other more attractive or cost-efficient methods to promote our services, which may negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. See Item 3.D. “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Operations Outside of China — We have been generating declining levels of revenue from our media advertising.” |
| • | | Impairment charges.We are required under U.S. GAAP to review our receivables, intangible assets, goodwill and other assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable. For the year ended December 31, 2008, in addition to impairment charges for some of the assets of our discontinued operations, we recorded an other-than-temporary loss on investments of $1.5 million related to our investment in a privately managed investment fund, which is included under short-term investments in our balance sheet as of December 31, 2008. For the year ended December 31, 2009, we recorded an impairment charge of $2.5 million related to goodwill of our PC game reporting unit, which was caused by a downward revision in expected future cash flows for that business resulting from market competition. For the year ended December 31, 2010, we recorded an impairment charge of $1.3 million related to a loan receivable. We may be required to record further impairment charges to earnings in our financial statements in future periods in which impairment in the carrying amount of our assets occurs. |
| • | | Taxes.Certain of our subsidiaries and affiliated Chinese entities have enjoyed tax exemptions and reduced tax rates. See “—Taxation” below. Such tax treatment increases our net income. Our future results could be materially adversely affected if we are not able to maintain similar tax treatment, particularly as a result of the revisions to the Chinese income tax law which became effective from January 1, 2008. |
Our Corporate Structure
We conduct our business in China solely through our wholly owned subsidiaries, which were Linktone Consulting, Huitong, Linktone Internet, Linktone Software and Wang You in 2010. Linktone Consulting provides internet and VAS consulting services; Huitong, Linktone Internet and Linktone Software specialize in software development; and Wang You develops PC games. These entities have no significant assets other than certain contractual arrangements with consolidated affiliates. See “ — Arrangements with Consolidated Affiliates” below. Ojava Overseas, Ruida and Xintong were dormant in 2010.
75
In October 2007, we incorporated two holding companies in Hong Kong, namely Noveltech and Linktone Media. Our investment in Linktone Consulting, Huitong, Linktone Internet and Xingtong have been transferred to Noveltech. In addition, in November 2009 we incorporated Linktone International Limited, or Linktone International, in the United Arab Emirates to hold our investments in the South East Asia region, including our 75% equity interest of InnoForm and our 51% interest in PT Linktone.
In March 2010, we and MIMEL acquired 50% and 25% of the share capital of InnoForm, respectively. In June 2010, we subscribed for 1,002,308 new shares of InnoForm and as a result of which we and MIMEL hold 75% and 12.5% of the equity interest of InnoForm, respectively. MIMEL also has the option to purchase the remaining 12.5% of outstanding share capital of InnoForm, whereby 7.5% and 5% of the share capital can be purchased within 18 and 30 months, respectively, of the agreement date. InnoForm is a Singapore-based company with regional offices in Malaysia and Hong Kong, specializing in the development, distribution and licensing of edutainment and entertainment products and holds licenses, properties and other assets related to its operations.
In June 2010, InnoForm acquired 98.7% of the equity interest in GLD, a limited liability company incorporated in Singapore, from its shareholders. Hary Tanoesoedibjo, one of the directors of our board and our chief executive officer, holds the remaining 1.3% of the equity interest in GLD. GLD’s principal asset is a commercial office building in Singapore.
In June 2010, we purchased a mandatory convertible bond (“MCB”) issued by IDN (which has been renamed PT Linktone) from Starlight which was convertible into 51% of new shares in PT Linktone. We purchased the MCB from Starlight, a United Arab Emirates company. In September 2010, we converted the MCB and now own 51% of PT Linktone with the remainder owned by MNC. PT Linktone specializes in providing VAS services in Indonesia and holds trade receivables, cash, commercial licenses, office equipment and other assets related to its operations.
In order to meet ownership requirements under Chinese law which place certain restrictions on Linktone, as a foreign company, to operate in certain industries such as value-added telecommunication and internet content services, we maintain control over the following PRC affiliated companies which are each owned by our current and/or former employees and are treated as our VIEs for accounting purposes: (i) Weilan; (ii) Unilink (iii) Yuan Hang; (iv) Cosmos; (v) Zhong Tong; (vi) Lian Fei; (vii) Qimingxing; (viii) Beijing Ojava; (ix) Ling Yu; (x) Lianyu; (xi) Lang Yi; (xii) Wei Lian; (xiii) Xian Feng; and (xiv) Letang.
Under the current shareholding structure, Weilan, Unilink, Cosmos, Zhong Tong, Lian Fei, Qimingxing, Beijing Ojava and Lianyu have inter-provincial value-added telecommunication services licenses issued by the MII. Each of Weilan, Unilink, Cosmos, Zhong Tong, Lian Fei, Qimingxing, Beijing Ojava and Lianyu offers our services through one or more of the telecommunications network operators in China. Yuan Hang offers services related to our online game business. Xian Feng provides music related content services to network operators. Ling Yu, Wei Lian and Lang Yi were dormant in 2010. In January 2010, Weilan acquired a 50.01% equity interest in Letang, a private Chinese company specializing in the development of mobile games and PC games, in connection with the development of our mobile online game business. Letang holds cash, accounts receivable and other assets related to its operations. We hold no direct ownership interest in these companies.
In July 2009, we established and, through contractual arrangements, maintain control over PT Cakrawala Alam Semesta, or Cakrawala, an Indonesian based company which is 50% owned by each of two of MNC Group’s employees. Cakrawala was established for the purpose of holding our short term investments mainly in the form of fixed deposits in Indonesia. For accounting purposes, Cakrawala is treated as our VIE. We hold no direct ownership interest in Cakrawala.
76
We, our Chinese affiliated entities and their respective shareholders are parties to a series of agreements governing the provision of our telecom valued-added services. In addition, as of December 31, 2010, we had provided long-term interest free loans to the shareholders of our Chinese affiliated entities with an aggregate outstanding balance of approximately RMB114.0 million (US$18.3 million). The proceeds from these loans have been used to fund investments in our Chinese affiliated entities. See “—Arrangements with Consolidated Affiliates” below.
Our primary internal source of funds is dividend payments from our wholly owned subsidiaries in China, Hong Kong, British Virgin Islands and United Arab Emirates, namely, Linktone Consulting, Huitong, Linktone Internet, Linktone Software, Xintong, Brilliant Concept Investments Ltd., or Brilliant, Wang You, Ojava Overseas Ltd., or Ojava Overseas, Ruida, Noveltech, Linktone Media and Linktone International. Under the Chinese tax regulations which became effective in January 2008, dividends paid to a foreign invested enterprise from Chinese entities are subject to a 10% withholding tax. However, a lower withholding tax rate will be applied if there is a tax treaty arrangement between mainland China and the jurisdiction of the foreign holding company. Holding companies in Hong Kong, for example, are subject to a 5% rate. Nevertheless, the PRC State Administration of Taxation promulgated a tax notice on October 27, 2009, or Circular 601, which provides that tax treaty benefits will be denied to “conduit” or shell companies without business substance, and a beneficial ownership analysis will be used based on a “substance-over-form” principle to determine whether or not to grant tax treaty benefits. It is unclear at this stage whether Circular 601 applies to dividends from our PRC subsidiaries paid to us through our Hong Kong subsidiaries. It is possible, however, that under Circular 601 our Hong Kong subsidiaries would not be considered to be the beneficial owners of any such dividends, and that such dividends would as a result be subject to income tax withholding at the rate of 10% rather than the favorable 5% rate applicable under the tax treaty between mainland China and Hong Kong. Under current Chinese law, Linktone Consulting, Huitong, Linktone Internet, Linktone Software, Wang You, Ruida and Xintong are also required to set aside a portion of their net income each year to fund certain reserve funds. These reserves are not distributable as cash dividends. Dividends paid to us by Brilliant and Ojava Overseas, which were incorporated in the British Virgin Islands, Noveltech and Linktone Media, which were incorporated in Hong Kong, and Linktone International which was incorporated in United Arab Emirates, are not subject to tax.
No dividends were received from our subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2010.
It is possible that the relevant Chinese authorities could, at any time, assert that any portion of or all of the existing or future ownership structure and businesses of us, any of our wholly owned subsidiaries, or any of our VIEs, violate existing or future Chinese laws, regulations or policies. It is also possible that the new laws or regulations governing the telecommunication or internet sectors in China that have been adopted or may be adopted in the future will prohibit or restrict foreign investment in, or other aspects of, any of our, our wholly owned subsidiaries’ or our affiliated Chinese entities’ current or proposed businesses and operations. In addition, these new laws and regulations may be retroactively applied. For example, on September 28, 2009, GAPP, the National Copyright Administration and the National Office of Combating Pornography and Illegal Publications jointly published the Notice Regarding the Consistent Implementation of the “Stipulations on ‘Three Provisions’ of the State Council and the Relevant Interpretations of the State Commission Office for Public Sector Reform and the Further Strengthening of the Administration of Pre-examination and Approval of Internet Games and the Examination and Approval of Imported Internet Games”, or Circular 13. Circular 13 expressly prohibits foreign investors from participating in internet game operating businesses via wholly owned, equity joint
77
venture or cooperative joint venture investments in China, and from controlling and participating in such businesses directly or indirectly through contractual or technical support arrangements. It is not clear yet as to whether other PRC government authorities, such as MOFCOM and MIIT, will support GAPP to enforce the prohibition of the VIE model that Circular 13 contemplates. If our current structure and our contractual arrangements were found to be in violation of any existing or future Chinese laws and regulations, we may be required to restructure our structure and operations in China to comply with such Chinese laws. In such case, we may not be able to operate or control our business in the same manner as we currently do, and therefore, may not be able to consolidate our VIEs. In addition, the relevant regulatory authorities would have broad discretion in dealing with such violations which may adversely impact our financial statements, operations and cash flows (including the restriction on us to carry out the business). It is unclear how such restructuring could impact our business and operating results.
We believe that our present operations are structured to comply with Chinese law. However, many Chinese regulations are subject to extensive interpretive powers of governmental agencies and commissions, and there are substantial uncertainties regarding the interpretation and application of current and future Chinese laws and regulations. Accordingly, we cannot be assured that Chinese regulatory authorities will not ultimately take a contrary view to our belief and will not take action to prohibit or restrict our business activities.
If our affiliated Chinese entities fail to perform their obligations under these agreements, we may have to incur substantial costs and expend significant resources to enforce those arrangements and rely on legal remedies under Chinese laws. The Chinese laws, rules and regulations are relatively new, and because of the limited volume of published decisions and their non-binding nature, the interpretation and enforcement of these laws, rules and regulations involve substantial uncertainties. These uncertainties may impede our ability to enforce these contractual arrangements, or suffer significant delay or other obstacles in the process of enforcing these contractual arrangements and materially and adversely affect our results of operations and the financial position.
Similarly, our VIE arrangements with Cakrawala could possibly be deemed in violation of existing Indonesia regulations on foreign investments in Indonesia time deposits. If our VIE arrangements with Cakrawala are restricted or prohibited, our interest in the investments held by it could be materially adversely affected.
Arrangements with Consolidated Affiliates
China
Current Chinese laws and regulations impose significant restrictions on foreign ownership of value-added telecommunication and online game businesses in China. Therefore, we conduct substantially all of our operations in China through a series of agreements with our affiliated Chinese entities, which were Weilan, Unilink, Yuan Hang, Cosmos, Zhong Tong, Lian Fei, Qimingxing, Beijing Ojava, Lianyu and Xian Feng, in 2010. These companies are variable interest entities, or VIEs, under Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) 810 (formerly known as Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 46R, or FIN 46R), and accordingly, have been consolidated into our financial statements. Transactions between these entities and our company and subsidiaries are eliminated in consolidation.
We believe that the terms of these agreements are no less favorable than we could obtain from disinterested parties. The material terms of the agreements among us, our respective affiliated Chinese entities and their shareholders are substantially identical except for the amount of the loans extended to the shareholders of each entity and the amount of license fees paid by each entity. We believe that the shareholders of our affiliated Chinese entities will not receive any personal benefits from these agreements, except as shareholders of our company. The principal terms of these agreements with our affiliated Chinese entities are described below.
78
Powers of Attorney.Each of the shareholders of our affiliated Chinese entities have irrevocably appointed Hary Tanoesoedibjo, our chairman and chief executive officer, as attorney-in-fact, to vote on their behalf on all matters on which they are entitled to vote with respect to affiliated Chinese entities as the case may be, including matters relating to the transfer of any or all of their respective equity interests in our affiliated Chinese entities and the appointment of the directors and general manager of our affiliated Chinese entities. The term of each of the powers of attorney is 10 years. These powers of attorney do not extend to votes by the shareholders of our company or subsidiaries.
Because the purpose of the irrevocable powers of attorney is to allow us to exercise sufficient control over our affiliated Chinese entities, each such power by its terms is valid only for so long as the designated attorney-in-fact remains an employee of one of our subsidiaries. If the attorney-in-fact ceases to be an employee of any of our subsidiaries or if our subsidiaries otherwise issue a written notice to dismiss or replace the attorney-in-fact, the power of attorney will terminate automatically and be re-assigned to another employee.
Operating Agreements. We guarantee the performance by our affiliated Chinese entities of contracts, agreements or transactions with third parties. In return, our affiliated Chinese entities have granted us a security interest over all of their assets, including all of their accounts receivable. We also have the right of first refusal with respect to future loan guarantees. In addition, our affiliated Chinese entities and their shareholders have each agreed that they will not enter into any transaction, or fail to take any action, that would substantially affect their assets, rights and obligations, or business without our prior written consent. They will also appoint persons designated by us as the directors, officers and other senior management personnel of our affiliated Chinese entities, as well as accept our guidance regarding their day-to-day operations, financial management and the hiring and dismissal of their employees. While we have the right to terminate all our agreements with our affiliated Chinese entities if any of our agreements with them expires or is terminated, our affiliated Chinese entities may not terminate the operating agreements during the term of the agreements, which is 10 years.
Exclusive Consulting Services Agreements. We provide most of our affiliated Chinese entities with exclusive consulting services related to legal, finance, human resources and office administration. The term of these services agreements is renewable every year. We charged Weilan, Unilink, Yuan Hang, Cosmos, Lian Fei, Zhong Tong, Qimingxing, Beijing Ojava, Xian Feng, an aggregate fee of $1.9 million, $2.0 million and $1.0 million for these services in 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively. The service fees payable to us are subject to our adjustment from time to time based on the actual operating results of our affiliated Chinese entities.
Trademark, Domain Name and Software License Agreements. In 2007, we granted Weilan and Unilink a license to use our domain name (www.linktone.com) and our registered trademarks. Linktone Consulting has also granted Weilan and Unilink licenses to use certain of its domain names. The licensee of each of the licenses described above pays us an annual license fee of RMB10,000 ($1,463). Because of the insignificant amounts involved, we waived these fees in 2008, 2009 and 2010. In addition, Huitong and Linktone Internet have granted Weilan, Unilink, Lian Fei, Zhong Tong, Qimingxing and Xian Feng multiple licenses to use various software programs relating to our SMS, MMS, WAP, CRBT and IVR platforms, databases and games. We invoiced Weilan, Unilink, Lian Fei, Zhong Tong, Qimingxing and Xian Feng an aggregate fee of $25.2 million, $25.2 million and $21.7 million for the use of this software in 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively.
The license agreements for trademark and domain names will terminate upon the earlier of 10 years or the expiration of our right to use the relevant domain names and trademarks. The term of the software license agreements is one to two years. Our affiliated Chinese entities cannot assign or transfer their rights under the licenses to any third party, and cannot use the licensed trademarks in television, newspapers, magazines, the internet or other public media without our prior written consent.
79
Domain Name Transfer Arrangements.In order to meet local requirements, we transferred to Weilan our ownership right in our domain name (www.linktone.com.cn) in December 2006.
Contracts Relating to the Exclusive Purchase Right of Equity Interest.Under the Contracts Relating to the Exclusive Purchase Right of Equity Interest among us, each of our affiliated Chinese entities and their respective shareholders, we or our designee has an exclusive option to purchase from each such shareholder all or part of his or her equity interest in our affiliated Chinese entities at book value, to the extent permitted by Chinese law. The term of these agreements is 10 years, renewable by us for an additional 10-year term at our sole discretion.
Loan Agreements.We have extended interest-free loans to the shareholders of our affiliated Chinese entities for the purpose of investing in our affiliated Chinese entities as registered capital and to make payments to the selling shareholders from whom we acquired certain of our affiliated Chinese entities for settlement of purchase price consideration pursuant to applicable acquisition agreements. The term of these loans in each case is 10 years. The shareholders of our affiliated Chinese entities can only repay the loans by transferring to us or our designees all of their equity interest in the respective affiliated Chinese entity. The following table sets forth the date the loan agreement was entered into, the borrower, the affiliated Chinese entity, the interest, the maturity date and the amount of each loan, as of December 31, 2010.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Date of loan | | | | Affiliated | | | | | | | |
agreement | | Borrower | | entity | | Interest | | Maturity date | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | RMB’000 | |
November 27, 2003 | | Baoxin Yao | | Weilan | | None | | November 26, 2013 | | | 2,798.7 | |
November 27, 2003 | | Wenlei Wang | | Weilan | | None | | November 26, 2013 | | | 2,365.8 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
August 25, 2004 | | Wenjun Hu | | Unilink | | None | | August 24, 2014 | | | 5,000.0 | |
August 25, 2004 | | Lin Lin | | Unilink | | None | | August 24, 2014 | | | 5,000.0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
May 31, 2005 | | Yuming Cai | | Yuan Hang | | None | | May 30, 2015 | | | 2,403.9 | |
May 31, 2005 | | Feng Gao | | Yuan Hang | | None | | May 30, 2015 | | | 2,403.9 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
June 30, 2005 | | Hongjie Qi | | Cosmos | | None | | June 29, 2015 | | | 16,953.1 | |
June 30, 2005 | | Miao Yan | | Cosmos | | None | | June 29, 2015 | | | 16,953.1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
June 30, 2005 | | Hongyan Lu | | Lian Fei | | None | | June 29, 2015 | | | 7,738.6 | |
June 30, 2005 | | Yuxia Wang | | Lian Fei | | None | | June 29, 2015 | | | 8,928.8 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
June 30, 2005 | | Teng Zhao | | Zhong Tong | | None | | June 29, 2015 | | | 6,850.6 | |
June 30, 2005 | | Yi Huang | | Zhong Tong | | None | | June 29, 2015 | | | 6,850.6 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
August 31, 2005 | | Xing Xu | | Qimingxing | | None | | August 30, 2015 | | | 7,528.5 | |
August 31, 2005 | | Peien Zhu | | Qimingxing | | None | | August 30, 2015 | | | 7,528.5 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
August 15, 2006 | | Yugang Wang | | Beijing Ojava | | None | | August 14, 2016 | | | 4,000.0 | |
August 15, 2006 | | Peiyu Su | | Beijing Ojava | | None | | August 14, 2016 | | | 4,000.0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
February 9, 2007 | | Xiao Ke Zha | | Lianyu | | None | | Feb 8, 2017 | | | 700.2 | |
February 9, 2007 | | Zhi Wang | | Lianyu | | None | | Feb 8, 2017 | | | 1,031.8 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 20, 2007 | | Ai Hua Zhang | | Xian Feng | | None | | Dec 19, 2017 | | | 2,550.0 | |
December 20, 2007 | | Juan Yang | | Xian Feng | | None | | Dec 19, 2017 | | | 2,450.0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | | | | | | | | | 114,036.1 | |
80
Equity Interests Pledge Agreements.The shareholders of Weilan, Unilink, Yuan Hang, Cosmos, Zhong Tong, Lian Fei, Qimingxing, Beijing Ojava, Lianyu and Xian Feng have pledged their respective equity interests in these entities to guarantee the performance and the payment of the service fees by these entities under the Exclusive Consulting Services Agreements and Software License Agreements described above. If our Chinese affiliated entities breach any of their obligations under the Equity Interests Pledge Agreements, we are entitled to sell the equity interests held by the relevant shareholders, and retain the proceeds of such sale or require any of them to transfer to us his or her equity interest in the applicable affiliated entity.
Indonesia
PT Cakrawala Alam Semesta, or Cakrawala, is an Indonesian company which we control through contractual arrangements and treated as our VIE for accounting purposes. Its only two shareholders are employees of MNC Group. We believe that the terms of our agreements with Cakrawala and its shareholders are no less favorable than we could obtain from disinterested parties.
In July 2010, Cakrawala and our company executed a placement loan agreement pursuant to which we loaned the aggregate principal amount of $35.0 million. Amounts outstanding under this loan facility are due and payable in full on demand at any time by us, and we have the sole right to call for payment or terminate the agreement. Cakrawala agrees that the rate of interest payable to our company is an amount equivalent to the interest paid by the banks in which proceeds from the loan described above are deposited. Cakrawala also may not assign or transfer all or any of its rights or obligations under the placement loan agreement. In 2010, Cakrawala has partially repaid the loan, and as at December 31, 2010, the outstanding loan balance was US$13.9 million.
In addition to irrevocable powers of attorney under which the shareholders of Cakrawala grant a power of attorney to our wholly owned subsidiary Noveltech to exercise all of their shareholder rights with respect to Cakrawala, including convening and voting at shareholder meetings, our contractual arrangements with respect to Cakrawala include the following:
| • | | Share pledge agreements, under which the shareholders of Cakrawala pledge their shares in that company as security for the loan from our company to Cakrawala; |
|
| • | | Irrevocable powers of attorney to sell, under which the shareholders of Cakrawala grant a power of attorney to our company to cause the sale of their shares in Cakrawala to any third party designated by us at any time, at such price and upon such terms and conditions as we shall approve; |
|
| • | | Pledge of operating account, under which Cakrawala pledges to our company all of its rights, title and interest in and to the deposit balances in all current and future bank accounts of Cakrawala to secure the repayment of our loan to Cakrawala; |
|
| • | | Irrevocable power of attorney to manage operating account, under which Cakrawala grants to our company a power of attorney to exercise all rights for and on behalf of Cakrawala over its banks accounts, including depositing money into or withdrawing money from such accounts, while our loan to Cakrawala remains outstanding; and |
|
| • | | Assignment of rights to dividends agreements, under which the shareholders of Cakrawala assign to our company all of their rights to any dividends paid by Cakrawala. |
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. We evaluate our estimates on an on-going basis based on historical experience and on various other assumptions we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our financial statements.
Revenue recognition
We recognize revenues in the period in which the services are performed or the goods are delivered, provided that persuasive evidence of a contractual arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured.
China VAS & mobile game
Our revenues in the PRC are mainly derived from entertainment-oriented telecom value-added services, including SMS, MMS, WAP, Java games, IVR and CRBT services to phone users through various subsidiaries of China Mobile, China Unicom, China Telecom and China Netcom. Following the restructuring of the Chinese telecommunications industry initiated by the relevant PRC government authorities in May 2008, the previously existing operators have been consolidated into three new operators, namely China Mobile, China Unicom and China Telecom (collectively, the “Operators”), which can offer both mobile and fixed line services. Fees for these services are charged on a per message basis or on a monthly subscription basis, and vary according to the type of products and services delivered. Our China VAS services are provided through codes we own, known as “access codes” or “short codes,” which are special telephone numbers shorter than full telephone numbers widely used for value-added services, such as television program voting, ringtone ordering, charity donations and mobile services.
81
We contract with the operators for the transmission of telecom value-added services as well as for billing and collection services. We measure our revenues based on the total amount paid by our customers, for which the operators bill and collect on our behalf. For this billing and collection service, the operators retain a fixed percentage fee, which is reflected as a cost of revenue in the financial statements. In addition, for SMS and MMS services, the operators charge us a network usage fee based on a fixed per message rate multiplied by the excess of messages sent over messages received. These network usage fees are likewise retained by the operators, and are reflected as a cost of revenue in the financial statements. Network usage fees charged to us are reduced for messages received by us as the operators separately charge the senders a fee for these transmissions. We have assessed our relationship with the operators and the terms of the fee arrangements under ASC 605-45 (“ASC 605-45”), “Principal Agent Considerations,” and have concluded that reporting the gross amount billed to our customers is appropriate based on the following factors:
| • | | Our ability to adjust the cost of our services by adjusting the design or marketing of the services; |
| • | | Our ability to control the content of services and suppliers of that content as long as it does not violate applicable PRC law or the relevant policies of the operators; |
| • | | Our assumption of all related legal and commercial risks arising from the content and services provided; |
| • | | Our assumption of risk of non-payment by customers; and |
| • | | Our ability to determine prices within ranges prescribed by the operators. |
A substantial portion of our revenue from the PRC is recorded based on monthly statements received from provincial level subsidiaries of the operators. In certain instances, when a statement is not received within a reasonable period of time, we are required to make an estimate of the revenue and cost of revenue earned during the period covered by the statement. On a quarterly basis, we estimate a portion of our revenue using internally generated transmission data and various other assumptions we have developed based on historical experience, that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.
We license content from independent content providers. Certain of these agreements determine the fees payable for content based on a percentage of revenues of we generated from the use of the content. We record our revenues inclusive of fees to be paid to content providers as we act as the principal in these arrangements. The fees paid to content providers are recorded in cost of revenue.
Our mobile game service revenue is primarily derived from providing downloadable mobile games products to mobile game operators. We contract with mobile game operators who in turn provide a platform for users to download our mobile games. We earn a fixed fee on a per download basis based on monthly or quarterly statements from the mobile game operators.
Indonesian VAS
Our revenues in Indonesia are derived from entertainment-oriented telecom value-added services to users of mobile telecommunications networks in Indonesia. We provide VAS services through agreements with MNC and Infokom, a related party, who in turn have cooperative arrangements with network operators in Indonesia. We measure our revenues based on the total amount paid by end users, net of any service fees kept by the network operators in Indonesia as well as any fees retained by MNC and Infokom for leasing short codes to us. We have assessed our relationship with MNC, Infokom and the network operators in Indonesia and the terms of the fee arrangements under ASC 605-45, and concluded that reporting the net amount received from MNC and Infokom as revenue is appropriate given that we are not the primary obligor in the arrangement. From the perspective of the network operators in Indonesia, MNC and Infokom are the registered service providers. In addition, from the end users’ perspective, MNC and Infokom are responsible for fulfillment of the services.
A substantial portion of our revenue from Indonesia is recorded based on monthly statements received from MNC and Infokom. In certain instances, when a statement is not received within a reasonable period of time, we are required to make an estimate of the revenues and cost of revenue earned during the period covered by the statement. On a quarterly basis, we estimate a portion of our revenues using internally generated transmission data and various other assumptions we have developed, that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.
Media content
Our media sales arrangements are evidenced by individual sales agreements. The prices are stated in the agreements and not subject to adjustment. We recognize revenue from the sale of goods when the risk of loss and title have been transferred to the customer, which usually occurs at the time shipment is made (i.e., destination point). For consignment sales, revenue is recognized when we receive notification that the goods have been sold by our customers.
PC games
We currently provide our PC game services through our subsidiaries, Brilliant, Wang You, and our VIE, Yuan Hang. We receive subscription fees from distributors for the sales of game cards, in either physical or virtual form, with a certain number of game points incorporated in the cards. The corresponding revenue is recognized as the game points are consumed by game players in games. Any sold game cards which are not activated by users and activated points which are not consumed in games constitute deferred revenue. Any game points held by players who are considered to be inactive are deemed consumed and recognized in revenue. The costs of PC game services include the cost of producing the game cards and bandwidth and server leasing charges.
82
Impairment Charges
Goodwill
Under ASC 350, goodwill is no longer amortized, but tested for impairment upon first adoption and annually (in December of each year) thereafter, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that it might be impaired. We assess goodwill for impairment in accordance with ASC 350 at the reporting unit level, defined as the operating segment or one level below an operating segment, and recognize impairment in the event that the carrying value exceeds the fair value of each reporting unit. The impairment charge was arrived at after a two-step process required under ASC 350. First, we determined the fair value of the reporting unit using the income approach based on the discounted expected future cash flow associated with this unit. We then compare the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value, including goodwill. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, we perform the second step to determine the impairment loss which is equal to the difference between the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill and the carrying amount of the goodwill. For the year ended December 31, 2009, impairment charge of $2.5 million was recorded against goodwill assigned to our PC game reporting unit. No impairment of goodwill was recorded in 2008 and 2010.
Long-lived Assets and Amortizing Intangible Assets
Long-lived assets and amortizing intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of asset may not be recoverable. We assess the recoverability of the long-lived assets and amortizing intangible assets by comparing the carrying amount to the estimated future undiscounted cash flow associated with the related assets. We recognize impairment of long-lived assets and amortizing intangible assets in the event that the net book value of such assets exceeds the estimated future undiscounted cash flow attributable to such assets.
The assumptions and estimates used in calculating the expected future cash flow and fair value involve inherent uncertainties and the use of management judgment. Our judgment is based on our experiences, expectation of business prospects, overall economic situation of the industry and market risks. Changes in these estimates and assumptions could materially impact our financial position and results of operations.
Income Taxes
Our provisions for income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities, and the extent to which deferred tax assets can be recognized, require significant management judgment. We make our judgments, assumptions and estimates by taking into account current tax laws and our interpretation of current tax laws. Changes in tax laws or our interpretation of tax laws could significantly impact our provisions for income taxes.
We make a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized based on our estimate of future taxable income and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. Actual taxable income in future years may differ from our current estimates and cause our valuation allowance to be inaccurate and thus materially impact our financial position and operating results.
We apply ASC 740-10-25, which requires that we recognize and disclose in our financial statements the impact of a tax position if that position is more likely than not of being sustained on audit, based on the technical merits of the position. The determination of the uncertain tax positions depends on our interpretation of relevant tax laws and estimates of the likelihood of our tax positions being sustained on audit. Actual interpretation of relevant tax laws by relevant tax officials may differ from our interpretation and may affect our tax liabilities and operating results.
83
Short-term Investments
Short-term investments include time deposits with original maturity terms of more than three months but due within one year and marketable equity securities. The marketable securities are classified as available-for-sale and carried at estimated fair value with unrealized gains and losses recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in shareholders’ equity. Realized gains or losses are credited or charged to income during the period in which the gain or loss is realized. If we determine a decline in fair value is other than temporary, the cost basis of the individual security is written down to fair value as a new cost basis and the amount of the write-down is accounted for as a realized loss. The new cost basis will not be changed for subsequent recoveries in fair value. Determination of whether declines in value are other-than-temporary requires significant judgment and consideration of various factors including the severity and duration of the impairment, anticipated recovery, financial condition and near term prospects of the investee, and our ability and intent to hold that security until the anticipated recovery in value occurs. Subsequent increases and decreases in the fair value of available-for-sale investments will be included in comprehensive income except for an other-than-temporary impairment, which will be charged to income in the statement of operations and comprehensive income. In 2008, based on our periodical impairment review, we determined that the decline in value of $1.5 million in an investment made in a privately managed fund which invests in marketable equity securities constitutes an other-than-temporary impairment charge. No impairment of short-term investments was recorded in 2009 and 2010.
Share-based Compensation
Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted the provisions of ASC 718 for share-based employee compensation arrangements. The guidance requires the measurement of the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments (such as employee stock options) at the fair value on the grant date. That cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award (the requisite service period). We calculate the fair value of each option grant on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Group recognizes the compensation costs, net of a forfeiture rate, on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award.
The determination of fair value of awards on the grant date using an option pricing model requires a number of complex and subjective assumptions, including our expected share price volatility over the term of the awards, the expected exercise behavior of our staff, and the expected dividend yield. We estimate our share price volatility based on our own historical data. In the absence of sufficient historical data in the exercise behavior of our staff, we estimate for the short term using the simplified method which applies the mid-point of the life of the option and average vesting period.
In addition, we are required to estimate forfeitures at the time of grant and record share-based compensation expense only for those awards that are expected to vest. If actual forfeitures differ from those estimates, we may need to revise those estimates used in subsequent periods.
The assumptions and estimates used in calculating share-based compensation expense involve inherent uncertainties and the use of management judgment. Although we believe the assumptions and estimates we have made are reasonable and appropriate, changes in factors and assumptions could materially affect our results.
84
Allowance for Doubtful Receivables
We provide a general provision for doubtful accounts and other receivables based on an aging analysis of accounts receivable balances, historical bad debt rates, repayment patterns, customer credit worthiness and industry trend analysis. We also make a specific allowance if there is strong evidence showing that the receivable is likely to be uncollectible. The assessment of the collectability of each account requires the use of substantial judgment and estimates. As of the end of 2008, 2009 and 2010, the allowance for doubtful accounts was $1.8 million (including discontinued operations of $0.7 million), $2.1 million (including discontinued operations of $0.3 million) and $2.2 million (including discontinued operations of $0.3 million), respectively.
Revenue
As described in “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates — Revenue and Cost of Revenue Recognition” above, we generate telecom value-added services revenue from service fees paid by mobile device users who use our services through the telecom network operators. Our telecom value-added services fees are charged on a monthly subscription or per use basis. We also derive revenue from media content and PC and mobile games.
PRC Telecommunication Value-added Services
Fees for our 2G SMS-based services in PRC currently range from RMB0.1 ($0.02) to RMB1.95 ($0.29) per message and from RMB5.0 ($0.75) to RMB15.0 ($2.25) per month for subscription services. Fees for 2.5G MMS, WAP and Java services currently range from RMB2 ($0.3) to RMB12.0 ($1.80) per message and from RMB5.0 ($0.75) to RMB15.0 ($2.25) per month for subscription services. Fees for audio-related services range from RMB1.0 ($0.15) to RMB3.0 ($0.45) per audio content download.
Indonesia Telecommunication Value-added Services
In 2010, our VAS revenue in Indonesia was generated from the sale of data-related services. Fees for our 2G SMS-based services in Indonesia currently range from IDR539 ($0.06) to IDR1,978 ($0.22) per message. Fees for 2.5G MMS, WAP and Java services currently range from IDR3,057 ($0.34) to IDR15,195 (1.69) per message.
Gross revenue from sales of VAS in Indonesia represented 2.5% of our total gross revenue in 2010.
Media Content
Revenue from our media content is generated primarily from the sale of VCD, DVD and Blu-Ray discs which are sold mainly to video retail stores at a discount to their retail price and from the distribution of movies to cinema chains which pay the distributor box office takings net of hall rental and distribution costs.
The following table shows the composition of our gross revenue by service category:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended December 31, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2010 | |
| | % | | | % | | | % | |
Data-related services | | | | | | | | | | | | |
China | | | 50 | | | | 54 | | | | 50 | |
Indonesia | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2 | |
| | | 50 | | | | 54 | | | | 52 | |
Audio-related services | | | | | | | | | | | | |
China | | | 42 | | | | 42 | | | | 26 | |
Indonesia | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | 42 | | | | 42 | | | | 26 | |
Media content | | | — | | | | — | | | | 17 | |
Mobile games | | | — | | | | — | | | | 3 | |
PC games | | | 3 | | | | 2 | | | | 2 | |
Others | | | 5 | | | | 2 | | | | — | |
Total revenue | | | 100 | | | | 100 | | | | 100 | |
85
In 2008 and 2009, “other” revenue included revenue for content and promotion services provided to other small service providers and technical services provided to a related party, respectively.
Our revenue in 2009 and 2010 also includes revenue from related parties in the amount of $0.7 million and $1.8 million, respectively. The revenue in 2009 was paid by an affiliate of MNC to us in exchange for technical advisory services rendered to the affiliate’s VAS operations in Indonesia. The revenue in 2010 represents revenue generated from VAS services offered by PT Linktone in Indonesia using short codes owned by MNC and its affiliate Infokom.
Cost of Revenue
Our cost of revenue includes the following:
| • | | Service and network fees payable to the telecom network operators, |
| • | | Payments to certain content and distribution channel providers for the use of their content and channels, and |
| • | | Payments to certain video and theatrical content and distribution channel providers for the use of their content and channels. |
Service and network fees are deemed paid when the telecom network operators remit to us our portion of the fees paid by users net of the service and network fees described above.
The following table sets forth the amount of each category of cost of revenue for the periods indicated:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended December 31, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2010 | |
| | $ | | | $ | | | $ | |
Cost of revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operators’ fees | | | 16,287,368 | | | | 15,233,712 | | | | 24,801,481 | |
Payments to content and distribution channel providers and others | | | 17,550,262 | | | | 23,707,560 | | | | 13,511,702 | |
Cost of goods sold in relation to video and theatrical products | | | — | | | | — | | | | 8,824,211 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 33,837,630 | | | | 38,941,272 | | | | 47,137,394 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Operating Expenses
Our operating expenses include product development, selling and marketing, general and administrative expenses and provision for impairment.
Product Development Expenses
Our product development expenses consist primarily of the salary and welfare expenses of our technical support team for our VAS business, which is responsible for our LT-IAG technology platform and other technical support, and our product development team, which focuses on aggregating, customizing and localizing our services. This category of expenses also includes depreciation and amortization of computers and software related to the activities of those teams and certain server custody fees.
Our SMS-based content and applications have been principally developed in-house. We develop slightly more than half of our MMS, WAP, Java and audio-related services content in-house with the remainder aggregated from third parties. As of December 31, 2010, approximately 85% of our product development expenses are related to our VAS business in China.
86
The following table shows the composition of our product development expenditure in China related to our data-related and audio-related services, general office information support and new businesses for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended December 31, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2010 | |
| | % | | | % | | | % | |
Data-related services | | | 38 | | | | 29 | | | | 55 | |
Audio-related services | | | 47 | | | | 52 | | | | 29 | |
General office information support | | | 14 | | | | 15 | | | | 14 | |
New businesses | | | 1 | | | | 4 | | | | 2 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | 100 | | | | 100 | | | | 100 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
We expect that the portion of our product development expenditures devoted to new businesses (including 3G services for the Indonesian market), particularly mobile games and value-added services to be offered in the other Asian markets we intend to enter, will increase moderately in the future.
Selling and Marketing Expenses
Our selling and marketing expenses consist primarily of the direct costs attributable to our sales and marketing activities, such as travel, entertainment, advertising expenses and cost of promotions. It also includes the salary and welfare expenses of the staff in our sales, marketing, customer research and service departments.
General and Administrative Expenses
Our other general and administrative expenses consist primarily of the salary and welfare, travel and entertainment expenses of our business development department and other administrative functions, such as legal, human resources, finance, office administration, investor relations and senior management. General and administrative expenses also include fees for professional services (e.g., audit, tax, legal, investor relations and recruitment), office rentals, office telecommunication and utilities costs and the amortization of office leasehold improvements. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the lesser of the relevant lease term or the assets’ estimated useful lives.
Provision for Impairment
Provisions for impairments include provisions with respect to short-term investments, other receivables, goodwill and other assets when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. In December 2009, we performed impairment tests on goodwill assigned to each reporting unit. We determined the fair value of the reporting units using the income approach based on the discounted expected future cash flows associated with these units. The expected future cash for the PC game reporting unit was revised downward in light of lower than expected revenue earned in the second half of 2009 due to market competition and management reorganization in this reporting unit in the last quarter of 2009. As a result, we recorded an impairment charge of $2.5 million in the PC game reporting unit. In addition, in 2007 we recorded an impairment provision for a loan receivable of $0.7 million in connection with our strategic investment in 9Sky International Ltd., Shanghai Yue Sheng Information Technology Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Yin Zhi Yue Information Technology Co., Ltd., or collectively the 9Sky entities. During 2009, we brought legal action in a court in Shanghai to recover the outstanding loan amount from the founders of 9Sky entities and related entities in China, and a repayment settlement was agreed in October 2009. We received a total repayment of $0.4 million in 2009 and $0.1 million in 2010 and the impairment provision for this loan receivable was reversed by such amounts in 2009 and 2010, respectively. In addition, in 2010, we recorded an impairment of a loan receivable of $1.3 million in connection with our arrangements to distribute U.S. Major League Baseball content, which have been terminated.
87
Taxation
Under the current laws of the Cayman Islands, British Virgin Islands and United Arab Emirates, we are not subject to a tax on income or capital gains in these jurisdictions. Under the current laws of Hong Kong, Noveltech and Linktone Media are subject to tax on income in Hong Kong at 16.5%. Under the current laws of Singapore, InnoForm is subject to tax on income at 17%. Under the current laws of the Republic of Indonesia, Cakrawala and PT Linktone are subject to tax on income at 25%.
However, our revenue is primarily derived from our affiliated Chinese entities. Prior to January 1, 2008, Chinese companies were generally subject to an Enterprise Income Tax, or EIT, of 33% consisting of a national income tax of 30% and a local tax of 3%.
In March 2007, the National People’s Congress in China enacted a new EIT law, which became effective from January 1, 2008. The new EIT law, among other things, imposes a unified income tax at 25%. The new EIT law allows a five-year transitional period for those entities established before March 16, 2007, which enjoyed a favorable income tax rate of less than 25% under the previous income tax laws and rules, to gradually change their rates to 25%. In addition, the new EIT law provides grandfather treatment for companies that qualified as foreign investment production enterprises such as Linktone Internet. Under the new EIT law, high and new technology enterprises still enjoy a preferential income tax rate of 15%.
Prior to January 1, 2008, Linktone Consulting, Weilan, Ruida, Wei Lian, Xian Feng, Lang Yi and Xintong were subject to EIT at the rate of 33%. Effective from January 1, 2008, the EIT rate applicable to these entities has been reduced to 25%. For Zhong Tong, Wang You, Linktone Software and Ling Yu, in 2007, they were subject to a preferential national income tax of 15% and were exempt from local tax due to the fact that they are located in economic development zones in either coastal cities or Shanghai Pudong New District. These entities were subject to a transitional tax rate of 18%, 20% and 22%, in 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively.
Huitong and Linktone Internet qualified as “foreign investment production enterprises established in a coastal economic development zone in an old urban district.” For Huitong, in 2007, the national income tax and local income tax rates applicable to Huitong were 12% and 1.5%, respectively, as it was entitled to a 50% reduction from the standard national income tax rate of 24% and local income tax rate of 3% applicable to qualified “foreign investment production enterprises established in a coastal economic development zone in an old urban district” under the tax rules in effect at that time. Effective from 2008, Huitong was subject to a unified EIT rate of 25% under the new EIT law. In 2009, Huitong was considered a high and new technology enterprise and enjoys a reduced tax rate of 15% from 2009 to 2011.
Linktone Internet was entitled to a 50% reduction from the then standard tax rate in 2007, 2008 and 2009. Therefore, in 2007, Linktone Internet was subject to a national income tax and a local income tax rate of 12% and 1.5%, respectively, and in 2008 and 2009, it was subject to an EIT rate of 12.5%. Its applicable tax rate starting in 2010 is 25%.
Our affiliated Chinese entities Unilink, and Qimingxing are currently considered “small businesses,” and in 2007, they were subject to a 3.3% tax on the difference between revenue and costs of services and other income. Their net profits for the year were subject to a further 20% personal income tax, levied as if these profits were distributed to the shareholders. In 2008 and 2009, Lian Yu was also considered a small business and Lian Yu Unilink and Qimingxing were subject to a 2.5% tax on revenue and other income. Their net profits for the year were subject to a further 20% personal income tax, levied as if these profits were distributed to the shareholders. As confirmed with the relevant tax offices, Unilink and Qimingxing are still considered as small businesses in 2010.
88
Prior to January 1, 2008, Yuan Hang, Cosmos, Lian Fei and Beijing Ojava qualified as “high and new technology” enterprises, and were therefore entitled to: (i) with respect to Cosmos, Lian Fei and Beijing Ojava, a three year national and local tax exemption followed by three years of 50% reduction in national and full exemption in local income tax rates, commencing from the first year of operations and (ii) with respect to Yuan Hang, a two year national and local tax exemption followed by three years of 50% reduction in national and full exemption in local income tax rates, commencing from the first year of profitability. These enterprises were also subject to a preferential statutory rate of 15% which comprises 15% national income tax and zero local income tax prior to January 1, 2008. Under the new EIT law, these entities’ qualifications as high and new technology enterprises are subject to a re-assessment by the relevant government authorities. Yuan Hang, Cosmos and Beijing Ojava passed their respective annual assessments for 2008 and continued to be entitled to preferential tax rate of 15% for three years from 2008 to 2010. Lian Fei did not qualify as a high and new technology enterprise, and its applicable tax rate in 2008, 2009 and 2010 was 25%.
The new EIT law also imposes a 10% withholding income tax for dividends distributed by a foreign invested enterprise to its immediate holding company outside China, which were exempted under the previous income tax laws and rules. A lower withholding tax rate of 5% will be applied if there is a tax treaty arrangement between mainland China and the jurisdiction of the foreign holding company. Holding companies in Hong Kong, for example, are subject to a 5% rate. Nevertheless, the PRC State Administration of Taxation promulgated a tax notice on October 27, 2009, or Circular 601, which provides that tax treaty benefits will be denied to “conduit” or shell companies without business substance, and a beneficial ownership analysis will be used based on a “substance-over-form” principle to determine whether or not to grant tax treaty benefits. It is unclear at this early stage whether Circular 601 applies to dividends from our PRC subsidiaries paid to us through our Hong Kong subsidiaries. It is possible, however, that under Circular 601 our Hong Kong subsidiaries would not be considered to be the beneficial owners of any such dividends, and that such dividends would as a result be subject to income tax withholding at the rate of 10% rather than the favorable 5% rate applicable under the tax treaty between mainland China and Hong Kong. The shareholdings in our Chinese subsidiaries have been transferred to two holding companies incorporated in Hong Kong, except for Wang You, Ruida and Linktone Software which are either dormant or loss making entities. According to the relevant PRC regulations, dividends on profits earned before January 1, 2008 are not subject to the withholding income tax, while dividends on profits earned after January 1, 2008 are subject to the withholding income tax. However, as of December 31, 2010, we did not make any provision on withholding tax of profits earned by some of our subsidiaries in 2010 because based on our business plan for the next few years, we do not plan to distribute retained earnings of our Chinese subsidiaries as we intend to retain such cash for re-investment in our Chinese operations. See Item 3.D. “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Doing Business in China—Any changes to our tax incentives could have a material adverse effect on our operating results. Our foreign ADS holders may be subject to PRC withholding tax on the dividends payable by us and upon gains realized on their sales of our ADSs if we are classified as a PRC ‘resident enterprise.’ ”
In addition, the Chinese tax system is generally subject to substantial uncertainties and has been subject to recently enacted changes, the interpretation and enforcement of which are uncertain. There can be no assurance that changes in Chinese tax laws or their interpretation or application will not subject our PRC entities to substantial Chinese taxes in the future. As and when the PRC government announces additional implementation regulations for the new EIT law, we will assess their impact, if any, and any change in accounting estimates will be accounted for prospectively.
89
Payments for software license fees and related technical consulting services provided by Huitong and Linktone Internet to some of our Chinese affiliated companies are subject to a 17.0% value-added tax, or VAT. Under applicable tax regulations, Huitong and Linktone Internet are entitled to a tax refund equivalent to the portion of VAT expense that is in excess of 3.0%. This VAT expense is shown in our “Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income” as a reduction in our revenue. For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, Huitong and Linktone Internet paid VAT in a total amount of $3.6 million, $3.9 million and $3.9 million, respectively, and received VAT refunds of $3.0 million, $2.3 million and $1.6 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, Huitong and Linktone Internet accrued a VAT refund receivable of $1.2 million, $2.0 million and $2.8 million, respectively, and payable of $1.4 million, $1.3 million and nil, respectively.
We are subject to a business tax on our revenue derived from services in China, which is generally 3% to 9% of revenue. Business tax applies to the gross revenue recognized by our Chinese affiliated entities and to the service fees charged to those entities by Linktone Consulting. The related business taxes paid for the services provided to customers and consulting services are accrued for as a reduction of revenue and in operating expenses respectively.
Subject to the approval of the relevant tax authorities, we had total tax loss carry forwards of approximately $23.1 million attributed to 10 PRC subsidiaries (including those from the discontinued operations of $16.1 million) as of December 31, 2010. The net operating losses will expire between 2010 and 2014. These tax loss carry forwards give rise to potential deferred tax assets totaling $6.2 million (including those from the discontinued operations of $4.4 million). For more information regarding our tax loss carry forwards and deferred tax assets, see “— Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates — Income Taxes” above. In addition, in 2007, we recorded an unrecognized tax benefit of $0.1 million related to promotional and research and development expenses. All of the unrecognized tax benefit, if recognized, would impact income tax expenses. It is possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefit will change in the next twelve months. This balance has remained unchanged and has been carried forward in each of the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010. We have recognized interest and penalties related to these uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. We recorded interest of $0.1 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2010.
Discontinued Operations
We, through our affiliated Chinese entities, Ling Yu and Lang Yi, acted as the exclusive advertising agent for QTV and TJSTV prior to the termination of the exclusive advertising arrangements with QTV and TJSTV in July 2008 and September 2008, respectively. Our results from the related advertising services provided by us are reported in our consolidated financial statements as discontinued operations for 2008, 2009 and 2010.
In 2008, the key costs of our discontinued operations included amortization of the payments made to acquire the rights to serve as the advertising agent for QTV and TJSTV, annual operating fees to QTV and its affiliate, landing fees to secure landing rights for QTV in cities in China and television program production costs such as costs for purchasing, acquiring the distribution rights for or revenue sharing arrangements for programs produced by other production companies, as well as production costs paid to production companies for producing the television programs we developed.
90
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth a summary of our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the periods indicated and as a percentage of gross revenue. Our historical operating results are not necessarily indicative of the results for any future period.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended December 31, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2010 | |
| | $ | | | % | | | $ | | | % | | | $ | | | % | |
Gross revenue | | | 67,025,802 | | | | 100.0 | | | | 62,216,694 | | | | 100.0 | | | | 71,708,025 | | | | 100.0 | |
Sales tax | | | (2,520,119 | ) | | | (3.8 | ) | | | (2,303,289 | ) | | | (3.7 | ) | | | (2,087,121 | ) | | | (2.9 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net revenue | | | 64,505,683 | | | | 96.2 | | | | 59,913,405 | | | | 96.3 | | | | 69,620,904 | | | | 97.1 | |
Cost of revenue | | | (33,837,630 | ) | | | (50.4 | ) | | | (38,941,272 | ) | | | (62.6 | ) | | | (47,137,394 | ) | | | (65.7 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross profit | | | 30,668,053 | | | | 45.8 | | | | 20,972,133 | | | | 33.7 | | | | 22,483,510 | | | | 31.4 | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Product development | | | (3,177,071 | ) | | | (4.7 | ) | | | (3,316,507 | ) | | | (5.3 | ) | | | (2,811,783 | ) | | | (3.9 | ) |
Selling and marketing | | | (13,130,513 | ) | | | (19.6 | ) | | | (9,318,469 | ) | | | (15.0 | ) | | | (8,377,743 | ) | | | (11.7 | ) |
General and administrative | | | (9,901,474 | ) | | | (14.8 | ) | | | (8,220,999 | ) | | | (13.2 | ) | | | (12,325,334 | ) | | | (17.2 | ) |
Provision for impairment | | | — | | | | — | | | | (2,068,127 | ) | | | (3.3 | ) | | | (1,102,265 | ) | | | (1.5 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total operating expenses | | | (26,209,058 | ) | | | (39.1 | ) | | | (22,924,102 | ) | | | (36.8 | ) | | | (24,617,125 | ) | | | (34.3 | ) |
Income (loss) from continuing operations | | | 4,458,995 | | | | 6.7 | | | | (1,951,969 | ) | | | (3.1 | ) | | | (2,133,615 | ) | | | (3.0 | ) |
Interest income, net of financial expenses (1) | | | 1,728,654 | | | | 2.5 | | | | 1,614,575 | | | | 2.6 | | | | 2,278,593 | | | | 3.2 | |
Other income, net of other expenses | | | 384,553 | | | | 0.6 | | | | 431,005 | | | | 0.7 | | | | 701,884 | | | | 1.0 | |
Other-than-temporary impairment loss on investments | | | (1,476,937 | ) | | | (2.2 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) before tax | | | 5,095,265 | | | | 7.6 | | | | 93,611 | | | | 0.2 | | | | 846,862 | | | | 1.2 | |
Income tax expense | | | (786,057 | ) | | | (1.2 | ) | | | (579,270 | ) | | | (0.9 | ) | | | (1,439,261 | ) | | | (2.0 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) from continuing operations | | | 4,309,208 | | | | 6.4 | | | | (485,659 | ) | | | (0.7 | ) | | | (592,399 | ) | | | (0.8 | ) |
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations | | | (20,807,008 | ) | | | (31.0 | ) | | | 596,551 | | | | (1.0 | ) | | | 315,256 | | | | 0.4 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | | (16,497,800 | ) | | | (24.6 | ) | | | 110,892 | | | | (0.3 | ) | | | (277,143 | ) | | | (0.4 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Interest income included $64,773, $325,080 and $85,594 from related parties for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively. |
Year Ended December 31, 2010 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2009
Gross Revenue
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended December 31, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2010 | |
| | $m | | | $m | | | $m | |
Data-related services | | | | | | | | | | | | |
China | | | 33.6 | | | | 34.0 | | | | 35.7 | |
Indonesia | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1.8 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | 33.6 | | | | 34.0 | | | | 37.5 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Audio-related services | | | | | | | | | | | | |
China | | | 28.1 | | | | 26.0 | | | | 18.7 | |
Indonesia | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | 28.1 | | | | 26.0 | | | | 18.7 | |
Media content | | | — | | | | — | | | | 12.2 | |
Mobile games | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2.0 | |
PC games | | | 2.0 | | | | 1.1 | | | | 1.3 | |
Others | | | 3.3 | | | | 1.1 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total revenue | | | 67.0 | | | | 62.2 | | | | 71.7 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Gross revenue increased by 15.3% from $62.2 million in 2009 to $71.7 million in 2010, primarily due to the commencement of revenue from media content in 2010, offset in part by a decrease in revenue from audio-related services.
Data-related services increased by 10.3% from $34.0 million in 2009 to $37.5 million in 2010 primarily due to the acquisition of PT Linktone, which operates our VAS business in Indonesia, in September 2010 and an increase in MMS revenue in China.
Audio-related services decreased by 28.1% from $26.0 million in 2009 to $18.7 million in 2010 primarily due to lower sales of IVR services resulting from new restrictions imposed by the operators in China with respect to IVR services offered in connection with interactive programs implemented starting in March 2010.
91
Media content revenue includes sales of DVDs, VCDs, Blu-rays, theatrical content and other services by InnoForm, in which we acquired a 50% interest in March 2010 and an additional 25% interest in June 2010. There was no such revenue in 2009.
Mobile games revenue represents revenue generated from the license of the right to use, or revenue-sharing arrangements for the operation of, games developed by Letang, in which Weilan acquired a controlling stake in January 2010.
PC games revenue remained relatively stable at $1.3 million in 2010 as compared to $1.1 million in 2009.
Other services decreased from $1.0 million in 2009 to nil in 2010 primarily due to the expiration of service contracts in 2009.
Cost of Revenue
Cost of revenue increased by 20.8% from $39.0 million in 2009 to $47.1 million in 2010, primarily due to the inclusion of InnoForm’s $9.3 million cost of revenue related to the distribution and sales of its entertainment and edutainment products, partially offset by a $1.0 million decrease in cost of VAS service fees which declined as a result of a decline in VAS revenue.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses increased by 7.4% from $22.9 million in 2009 to $24.6 million in 2010, primarily as a result of higher general and administrative expenses, partially offset by (i) lower provision for impairment (ii) lower selling and marketing expenses and (iii) lower product development expenses.
As a percentage of gross revenue, operating expenses decreased from 36.8% in 2009 to 34.3% in 2009.
General and administrative expenses increased by 50% from $8.2 million in 2009 to $12.3 million in 2010, primarily due to general and administrative expenses of subsidiaries acquired during the year.
Product development expenses decreased by 15.2% from $3.3 million in 2009 to $2.8 million in 2010 primarily due to lower office rentals, outsourcing fees and office expenses. The decrease in office rental is due to the expiration and non-renewal of certain rental agreements in 2010 as part of our efforts to better utilize office space. The decrease in outsourcing fees and office expenses is due to reduced efforts in developing IVR services which was in line with the decline in IVR revenue.
Selling and marketing expenses decreased by 9.7% from $9.3 million in 2009 to $8.4 million in 2010, primarily due to fewer marketing activities via operator channels conducted by our VAS unit during the year.
92
Provision For Impairment
In 2009, we recorded an impairment charge of $2.5 million related to goodwill from our PC game business, which was offset by $0.4 million related to partial recovery of certain overdue loans extended by our company to 9Sky entities. In 2010, we recorded an impairment charge of $1.3 million related to loans extended by our company to Allied Pacific Sports Baseball Network Limited, or APBNL, in which we hold a direct 45% equity interest and an indirect interest through our 30% equity interest in APBNL’s other shareholders, Allied Pacific Sports Network Limited, or APSN, which was partially offset by a reversal of provision for impairment of $0.1 million related to partial recovery of certain overdue loans extended by our company to 9Sky entities. The loans to APBNL and APSN were made in connection with the distribution of certain U.S. Major League Baseball-related interactive rights in selected countries in Asia, which arrangement was subsequently terminated. See “- Provision for Impairment” above.
Interest and Other Income
Interest income increased by 43.8% from $1.6 million in 2009 to $2.3 million in 2010, primarily due to an increase in interest-bearing short-term investments by 73.1% from $19.7 million in 2009 to $33.8 million in 2010.
Other income increased by 75% from $0.4 million in 2009 to $0.7 million in 2010. In 2010, other income mainly comprises subsidy income from local governments based on business and tax refunds.
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense increased by 133.3% from $0.6 million in 2009 to $1.4 million in 2010. The increase was in line with the increase in profitability of our Chinese subsidiaries and VIEs and the inclusion of our profitable Indonesian subsidiary that was acquired during 2010.
Discontinued Operations
We generated net income of $0.6 million and $0.3 million from discontinued operations in 2009 and 2010. The net income in 2010 resulted from the settlement of certain accounts payable by suppliers.
Year Ended December 31, 2009 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2008
Gross Revenue
Gross revenue decreased by 7.2% from $67.0 million in 2008 to $62.2 million in 2009, primarily due to decreases in revenue from 2.5G services (WAP and MMS), audio-related (CRBT) services and other services. Our 2G services revenue increased by 16.4% from $27.5 million in 2008 to $32.0 million in 2009. Our 2.5G services revenue decreased by 67.7% from $6.2 million in 2008 to $2.0 million in 2009. Our audio-related services revenue decreased by 7.5% from $28.1 million in 2008 to $26.0 million in 2009. Other services primarily include the provision of VAS-related content, marketing and technical services to certain small service providers in China and an affiliate of MNC. Revenue from these services amounted to $3.0 million in 2008 but decreased to $1.1 million in 2009, which included a service fee of $0.7 million from providing VAS-related marketing and technical services to GTS Far East Ltd., an affiliate of MNC with VAS business operations in the Republic of Indonesia.
In 2009, SMS, IVR, CRBT and 2.5G (MMS, Java and WAP services) accounted for 51.4%, 32.8%, 9.0% and 3.2%, respectively, of our gross revenue. Telecom value-added revenue related to services offered to China Telecom, China Unicom, and China Mobile customers represented 12.6%, 9.5% and 74.4% of our total revenue in 2009, respectively, compared to 11.3%, 7.7% and 73.1%, respectively, in 2008.
93
Revenue from our IVR services increased by 14.6% from $17.8 million in 2008 to $20.4 million in 2009. The number of dial-ins, based on our internal records, for our IVR services increased by 21.5% primarily due to cooperation projects with more business partners with appealing content. However, the average fee per dial-in in U.S. dollar terms decreased by 6.0% due to a change in product mix as a result of the growth in cooperation projects focusing on shorter dial-in interactive programs over radio and television. Revenue from our CRBT services decreased by 45.6% from $10.3 million in 2008 to $5.6 million in 2009, primarily due to a decrease in the number of promotion activities such as singer fan club activities and certain song promotion activities held by provincial offices of the operators with us during 2009.
Revenue from our MMS and WAP services decreased significantly from $5.3 million in 2008 to $0.8 million in 2009. This was primarily due to a lack of appealing content and effective distribution channels to promote these services. In addition, our WAP revenue was affected by a change in the operators’ policy which prevent all service providers from charging for WAP services since November 2009.
Other services decreased by 63.3% from $3.0 million in 2008 to $1.1 million in 2009 primarily due to the expiration of certain service contracts in early 2009.
Cost of Revenue
Cost of revenue increased by 15.4% from $33.8 million in 2008 to $39.0 million in 2009, primarily due to the fact that a larger proportion of our revenue in 2009 was generated by revenue-sharing arrangements with handset manufacturers and handset designers for our SMS and with radio program producers for our IVR, with the fees payable to such parties included in cost of revenue.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses decreased by 12.6% from $26.2 million in 2008 to $22.9 million in 2009, primarily as a result of (i) lower selling and marketing expenses as a larger portion of our revenue in 2009 was generated from revenue sharing arrangements and cooperation projects, and expenses incurred therefrom are recorded as cost of revenue and not selling and marketing expenses, and (ii) lower general and administrative expenses, offset by (iii) a provision for impairment on the goodwill assigned to our PC game reporting unit.
As a percentage of gross revenue, operating expenses decreased from 39.1% in 2008 to 36.8% in 2009.
Product development expenses increased by 3.1% from $3.2 million in 2008 to $3.3 million in 2009 primarily due to higher staff costs. Staff costs for product development increased by 13.3% from $1.5 million, or 5.7% of our total operating expenses in 2008, to $1.7 million, or 7.4% of our total operating expenses in 2009, primarily as a result of higher salaries.
Selling and marketing expenses decreased by 29.0% from $13.1 million in 2008 to $9.3 million in 2009, primarily because we increased our reliance on revenue sharing arrangements and cooperation projects with handset manufacturers, handset designers and radio program producers in 2009, and expenses incurred therefrom are recorded as cost of revenue rather than selling and marketing expenses. Expenses for marketing, advertising and promotional activities for our telecom value-added services decreased from $9.5 million, or 36.3% of our total operating expenses in 2008, to $6.8 million, or 29.7% of our total operating expenses in 2009.
General and administrative expenses decreased by 17.2% from $9.9 million in 2008 to $8.2 million in 2009, primarily due to lower stock compensation costs and depreciation charges and the implementation of cost-control measures that reduced expenses in personnel costs, traveling, professional service fees and office rentals.
94
Provision For Impairment
In 2009, we recorded an impairment charge of $2.5 million related to goodwill from our PC game business, which was offset by $0.4 million related to partial recovery of certain overdue loans extended by our company to 9Sky entities. See “- Provision for Impairment” above.
Interest and Other Income
Interest income decreased by 5.9% from $1.7 million in 2008 to $1.6 million in 2009, primarily due to a decrease in our cash and cash equivalents.
Other income remained relatively stable at $0.4 million in 2008 and 2009. Other income mainly comprises investment income and subsidy income from local governments based on business and income taxes paid by us.
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense decreased by 25.0% from $0.8 million in 2008 to $0.6 million in 2009. The decrease was in line with the decrease in profitability of our Chinese subsidiaries and VIEs.
Discontinued Operations
We generated net income of $0.6 million from discontinued operations in 2009 and incurred a net loss of $20.8 million in 2008. The net income in 2009 resulted from a reversal of certain provisions for doubtful accounts receivable as cash was subsequently collected from customers and a lower amount of payables was finalized with suppliers.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary sources of liquidity are the proceeds from our initial public offering in March 2004 and cash flow from operations, as well as the investment in our company by MNC in 2008. The following table sets forth the summary of our cash flows for the periods indicated:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended December 31, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2010 | |
| | $ | | | $ | | | $ | |
Net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations | | | 7,970,372 | | | | 546,684 | | | | 1,237,562 | |
Net cash (used in)/provided by operating activities of discontinued operations | | | (10,799,804 | ) | | | 4,395,367 | | | | — | |
Net cash used in investing activities of continuing operations | | | (12,887,561 | ) | | | (6,480,967 | ) | | | (25,686,289 | ) |
Net cash used in investing activities of discontinued operations | | | (16,210 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities of continuing operations | | | 57,359,539 | | | | (438,160 | ) | | | 3,188,321 | |
Effect of exchange rate change on cash | | | 641,903 | | | | (139,594 | ) | | | 658,652 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | | 42,268,239 | | | | (2,116,670 | ) | | | (20,601,754 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year | | | 39,325,584 | | | | 81,593,823 | | | | 79,477,153 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year | | | 81,593,823 | | | | 79,477,153 | | | | 58,875,399 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
95
The ability of our PRC subsidiaries to obtain cash or other assets from our affiliated Chinese entities, Weilan, Unilink, Yuan Hang, Cosmos, Zhong Tong, Lian Fei, Qimingxing, Beijing Ojava, Xian Feng depends on the effectiveness and enforceability of our agreements with those entities and their owners. A description of these agreements is set forth under “—Arrangements with Consolidated Affiliates” above. In turn, the ability of our PRC subsidiaries to convert Renminbi into U.S. dollars and transfer them to our company is subject to the Chinese foreign exchange regulations, including primarily the restriction on foreign invested enterprises that they may only buy, sell and/or remit foreign currencies at those banks authorized to conduct foreign exchange business after providing valid commercial documents.
Operating Activities of Continuing Operations
Cash provided by operating activities was $8.0 million, $0.5 million and $1.2 million in 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively. The movements in cash provided by operating activities were generally in line with the movements in operating income/(loss) from continuing operations, excluding non-cash income statement items such as depreciation and amortization.
Operating Activities of Discontinued Operations
Cash used in operating activities of discontinued operations was $10.8 million in 2008 and cash provided by operating activities of discontinued operations was $4.4 million and nil in 2009 and 2010, respectively. The cash outflow for discontinued operations in 2008 was primarily related to the payments made in connection with the advertising arrangements with QTV and payments for establishing the relationship with TJSTV which commenced in January 2008 and were terminated in July 2008 and September 2008, respectively. The cash inflow for discontinued operations resulted from a refund of $3.5 million from TJSTV for prepayment of annual advertising fees relating to the last quarter of 2008 after the termination of the contract with TJSTV in September 2009 and certain cash collected by our VIEs from customers for advertisements on TJSTV prior to September 2009.
Investing Activities of Continuing Operations
Cash used in investing activities was $12.9 million, $6.5 million and $25.7 million in 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively. In 2008, net cash used in investing activities primarily consisted of an increase in short-term investments of $7.9 million and an investment of $5.0 million in a private managed fund. In 2009, net cash used in investing activities primarily consisted of an increase in short-term investments of $4.9 million and $1.9 million cash paid in connection with financing arrangements involving PT MNC Sky Vision, an affiliate of our controlling shareholder, MNC, and Humax Co., Ltd., offset by cash of $0.4 million collected from 9Sky entities. In 2010, net cash used in investing activities primarily consisted of short-term investments of $20.1 million, and business acquisitions of $13.7 million, partially offset by proceeds received from the maturity of time deposits of $7.6 million, proceeds received from the disposal of property and equipment of $2.0 million and net loans repayment from related party of $0.9 million.
Investing Activities of Discontinued Operations
Cash used in investing activities of discontinued operations was $0.02 million, nil and nil in 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively.
96
Financing Activities of Continuing Operations
In 2008, cash provided by financing activities was $57.4 million, primarily consisting of the strategic investment by MNC of $68.4 million, which was partially offset by professional and other fees incurred by our company in connection with the MNC strategic investment in the amount of $3.3 million and a loan to a related party in the amount of $7.8 million. In 2009, cash used in financing activities was $0.4 million, consisting of the payment of remaining legal fees of $0.5 million in connection with the investment by MNC which was offset in part by the net proceeds from the exercise of stock options. In 2010, cash provided by financing activities of $3.2 million, was from bank borrowings.
We have no written treasury or borrowing policy. We keep almost all of our cash in U.S. dollar or RMB or Indonesian rupiah denominated bank accounts, short-term time deposits or short-term, investment grade fixed income securities for two principal purposes: to finance our operations and to manage the interest rate and currency risks arising from our operations. We adjust the amount of cash held in U.S. dollars, RMB and Indonesian rupiah from time to time to maximize our interest rate returns and to ensure that we have sufficient RMB for our operational needs, including for lease and other commitments. We have not historically financed our operations through borrowings and have not used derivative instruments to hedge against market risks.
In April 2008, MNC completed its investment in our company. Pursuant to the acquisition agreement entered into by and between us and MNC in November 2007, MNC subscribed for 180,000,000 newly issued ordinary shares of Linktone at a price of $0.38 per ordinary share for a total consideration of $68.4 million.
We believe that current cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to meet anticipated working capital (net cash used in operating activities) commitments and capital expenditures in the foreseeable future. We may, however, require additional cash resources due to changed business conditions or other future developments, including any investments or acquisitions we may decide to pursue. If these sources are insufficient to satisfy cash requirements, we may seek to sell additional equity or debt securities or to obtain a credit facility. The sale of additional equity or convertible debt securities could result in additional dilution to shareholders. The incurrence of indebtedness would result in increased debt service obligations and could result in operating and financial covenants that would restrict operations. Financing may not be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all.
Research and Development
We believe that a key part of our future success in telecom value-added business will depend on our ability to develop and enhance our services by leveraging our expertise in entertainment-oriented telecom value-added services.
Our total expenditures for research and development were $3.2 million, $3.3 million and $2.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively. We expanded our product development department in October 2008 by establishing a dedicated mobile games product development team and an overseas product development team to focus on our new businesses in these two areas. Due to a change in strategy by our management, we decided to terminate the mobile games product development department in September 2009, and we bought a controlling interest in a private Chinese company specializing in the development of mobile games and PC games, Letang, in January 2010.
We develop a portion of the content for our services in-house and aggregate it from domestic and international providers or through acquisitions. We plan to enter into additional relationships with domestic and international providers, in particular with respect to the development of games and content for all of our 2.5G services which we are developing, in order to fully utilize the technological benefits of 2.5G and the sophisticated premium content which users will demand. We are also developing 3G services for the Indonesian market. For aggregated third-party content, most of our efforts involve customization, localization and related development activities of the content for the Chinese market to create appealing, user-friendly products.
97
Certain provincial and local offices of the telecom network operators use different software and technology. Our product development department must conform our services so that they are interoperable with the networks of each network operator in China and Indonesia at all levels.
Intellectual Property and Proprietary Rights
We rely primarily on a combination of copyright laws and contractual restrictions to establish and protect our intellectual property rights. We require our employees to enter into agreements to keep confidential all information relating to our customers, methods, business and trade secrets during and after their employment with us. Our employees are required to acknowledge and recognize that all inventions, trade secrets, works of authorship, developments and other processes, whether or not patentable or copyrightable, made by them during their employment are our property. They also sign agreements to substantiate our sole and exclusive right to those works and to transfer any ownership that they may claim in those works to us.
While we actively take steps to protect our proprietary rights, such steps may not be adequate to prevent the infringement or misappropriation of our intellectual property. This is particularly the case in China where the laws may not protect our proprietary rights as fully as in the United States. Infringement or misappropriation of our intellectual property could materially harm our business. We have registered 12 and 8 primary internet domain names in PRC and Singapore, respectively. Their domain names in English and Chinese are listed below:
| | |
PRC | | Singapore |
linktone.com | | innoform.com.sg |
vrhappy.com | | innoform.com.my |
vrhappy.net | | innoform.com.hk |
mhappy.net | | innoform.com.tw |
my1828.com | | innokidz.com.sg |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b4e9/8b4e9ff1ee3497c6e39621c8eae7c58f4dba4442" alt="(CHINESE CHARACTER)" .com | | innokidz.com.hk |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a829/6a8296c8be838fdda4c190862b54cb66f2fa24c7" alt="(CHINESE CHARACTER)" .com | | all-entertainment .com.sg |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8af70/8af70e3a0a7761aadd4a88cb280d4a6073a26196" alt="(CHINESE CHARACTER)" .com | | ltongroup.com |
linktone.mobi | | |
go368.net | | |
uwise.com.cn | | |
ojava.com | | |
As of December 31, 2010, we had registered 107 trademarks with China Trademark Office, relating to our company name and logo and some of our services. We are in the process of applying for 34 additional trademarks in China. We have no trademarks registered in the other markets in which we operate, including Indonesia.
China’s trademark law adopts a “first-to-file” system for obtaining trademark rights. As a result, the first applicant to file an application for registration of a mark will preempt all other applicants. Prior use of unregistered marks, except for statutorily defined “well known” marks, is generally not a basis for legal action in China. We may not be able to successfully defend or claim any legal rights in those trademarks for which applications have been made but for which the Trademark Office has not issued a registration certificate.
98
As of December 31, 2010, we had also obtained 27 copyright certificates in China for cartoons and images and 40 copyright certificates for computer software.
Many parties are actively developing and seeking patent protection for wireless services-related technologies. We expect these parties to continue to take steps to protect these technologies, including seeking patent protection. There may be patents issued or pending that are held by others and that cover significant parts of our technology, business methods or services. Disputes over rights to these technologies are likely to arise in the future. We cannot be certain that our products do not or will not infringe valid patents, copyrights or other intellectual property rights held by third parties. We may be subject to legal proceedings and claims from time to time relating to the intellectual property of others.
Trend Information
Other than as disclosed in this annual report, we are not aware of any recent trends that are likely to have a material effect on our business.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any outstanding derivative financial instruments, off-balance sheet guarantees, interest rate swap transactions or foreign currency forward contracts. We do not engage in trading activities involving non-exchange traded contracts.
Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations
We have entered into leasing arrangements relating to our office premises with third parties. As of December 31, 2010, we had no commitments beyond three years. The following table sets forth our commitments as of December 31, 2010:
| | | | |
| | Office Premises | |
| | $ | |
Less than one year | | | 518,093 | |
One to three years | | | 205,386 | |
| | | |
Total | | | 723,479 | |
| | | |
Inflation
The inflation rate in China increased in 2010. According to the National Bureau of Statistics of China, the change in the Consumer Price Index in China was 5.9%, (0.7%) and 4.8% in 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively. Inflation has had and it may continue to have an impact on the costs of our operations, particular personnel-related costs.
99
Inflation rates in Singapore and Indonesia increased between 2009 and 2010 from 0.6% to 2.8% and 2.78% to 6.96%, respectively, according to the Singapore Statistics Department and Bank Indonesia.
| | |
Item 6. | | Directors, Senior Management and Employees |
A. Directors and Senior Management
The names of our current directors and executive officers, their ages and the principal positions with Linktone held by them, as of April 30, 2011, are as follows:
Directors and Officers (1)
| | | | | | | | |
Name | | Age | | | Position | | Class |
Hary Tanoesoedibjo | | | 45 | | | Chairman of our board and Chief Executive Officer | | III |
Oerianto Guyandi(2) | | | 43 | | | Director | | II |
Peck Joo Tan | | | 49 | | | Director and Chief Financial Officer | | III |
Billy Hsieh (3) | | | 54 | | | Director | | I |
| | |
(1) | | Our director, Thomas Hubbs, and our chief financial officer and deputy chief executive officer, Colin Sung, resigned in January 2011. |
|
(2) | | Member of nominating and compensation committee. |
|
(3) | | Member of audit committee. |
Our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association provide for the division of our board of directors into three classes. Our Class I director is Billy Hsieh, our Class II director is Oerianto Guyandi and our Class III directors are Hary Tanoesoedibjo and Peck Joo Tan. The current terms of the Class I, II and III directors expire upon the election and qualification of directors at the annual general meetings to be held in 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively. At each annual general meeting, directors who are elected will serve a three-year term until such director’s successor is elected and is duly qualified, or until such director’s earlier death, bankruptcy, insanity, resignation or removal. There are no family relationships among any of the directors or executive officers of our company.
Biographical Information
Hary Tanoesoedibjohas served as the Chairman of our board since April 2008 and as our Chief Executive Officer since May 2009. He has been the President Director and Chief Executive Officer of MNC since March 2004. Also, he has been the President Director, Group President and Commissioner of PT Bhakti Investama Tbk., an investment company in Indonesia, PT Global Mediacom Tbk., a media company in Indonesia, PT MNC Sky Vision, a satellite television station in Indonesia, and PT Rajawali Citra Televisi, a privately owned television network in Indonesia, since June 2009, April 2002, July 2004, December 2006 and April 2008, respectively. He has been the director of MNC International Ltd. and MNC International Middle East Limited since March 2007 and May 2007, respectively. All these companies are affiliates of MNC. He received a Bachelor of Commerce (Honors) degree from Carleton University and a Master of Business Administration degree from Ottawa University.
Oerianto Guyandihas served on our board since July 2009 and has been a director of MNC since June 2009, as well as the Chief Financial Officer of PT Global Mediacom Tbk., the parent holding company of MNC, since December 2008. He has extensive experience in accounting and financial services. He held several senior positions in companies which are affiliates of MNC, such as a director of MNC International Ltd. and MNC International Middle East Limited since December 2007 and May 2010, respectively, a managing director at PT Rajawali Citra Televisi Indonesia, or RCTI, and PT Global Informasi Bermutu from 2007 to 2008, a director of finance at PT MNC Sky Vision from 2004 to 2008, a director of operations at RCTI from 2001 to 2004 and head of investment banking of PT Bhakti Investama & Bhakti Capital Indonesia from 1999 to 2001. His career began in the public accounting firm of Prasetio Utomo & Co. and in Salim Group. He holds a Bachelor’s degree in Economics in Accounting from the University of Indonesia and a Bachelor’s degree in Agricultural Engineering from Institute Pertanian Bogor in Indonesia.
100
Peck Joo Tanhas served on our board since December 2010 and since June 2010 has served as a managing director of the international business division of PT Media Nusantara Citra Tbk, the indirect majority shareholder of Linktone. Prior to that, she held various regional financial and general management positions in the Asian offices of MediaCorp Pte Ltd, Heinz, Pepsi, Fritolay, Starbucks and Delifrance. Ms. Tan graduated with a degree in Accountancy from the National University of Singapore and is a member of the Institute of Certified Public Accountants of Singapore and Institute of Marketing of the United Kingdom.
Billy Hsiehhas served as an independent director since February 2011. He replaced Thomas Hubbs who resigned to pursue other professional commitments. Mr. Hsieh joined PricewaterhouseCoopers in San Francisco in 1986, was admitted as a partner in 1996 and served in its Shanghai office from 1996 until his retirement in 2010. He has over 15 years of experience advising multinational corporations about doing business in China, including experience in market entry and development, mergers and acquisitions, tax advisory and other activities in China. He graduated with a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting from St. John’s University and a law degree from the University of California, Hastings College of the Law, both in the United States. He is licensed as a certified public accountant in California and is a member of the California bar.
Hary Tanoesoedibjo and Oerianto Guyandi were appointed in connection with MNC’s strategic investment in our company, which was completed in April 2008. As of April 30, 2011, MNC held 58.2% of our total outstanding ordinary shares.
B. Compensation
Director Compensation
In 2010, we paid an aggregate of approximately $0.2 million to our non-executive directors. During 2010, no stock options to purchase our ordinary shares were granted to our non-executive directors. Directors who are also employed by our company do not receive separate fees as our directors.
All of our current directors have entered into indemnification agreements in which we agree to indemnify, to the fullest extent allowed by Cayman Islands law, our charter documents or other applicable law, those directors from any liability or expenses, unless the liability or expense arises from the director’s own willful negligence or willful default. The indemnification agreements also specify the procedures to be followed with respect to indemnification. We currently maintain directors’ and officers’ liability insurance on behalf of our directors and officers.
Executive Officer Compensation
In 2010, we paid an aggregate of $0.7 million of basic salary and benefits to our executive officers, including the chief financial officer and deputy chief executive officer, Colin Sung, who tendered his resignation during the year. No options were granted to our executive officers in 2010.
101
Employment Agreements
We have entered into an employment agreement with Hary Tanoesoedibjos. In addition, Peck Joo Tan has executed an appointment letter with InnoForm and is in the process of entering into an employment agreement with our company.
The employment agreement between Hary Tanoesoedibjo and us is an open-term contract and Mr. Tanoesoedibjo is not entitled to any severance benefits under his employment agreement.
Under the appointment letter with InnoForm, Peck Joo Tan agreed, among other things, to assign all rights in company-related inventions to us, and to keep our proprietary information confidential. In addition, Ms. Tan is prohibited from directly or indirectly (i) being employed by or participate in the management or operation of any business or entity that is or may be directly competitive with and offering similar products or services as us, for a period after termination of employment for any reason of one year if that business or entity is in Indonesia or for a period of three months if that business or entity is outside Indonesia, (ii) soliciting for employment any person who was employed by us during his/her employment with us, for a period of six months after termination of employment for any reason or (iii) soliciting or doing business with any supplier or agent of any supplier of ours during her employment with us, for a period of six months after termination of employment for any reason.
We do not have any service contracts with non-executive directors providing for benefits upon termination of service.
Aggregate Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year-End Option Values
Our executive officers did not exercise any stock options in 2010.
Summary of Stock Plans
2003 Stock Incentive Plan
Our board of directors and shareholders adopted our 2003 Plan in November 2003. Under the 2003 Plan, we may grant awards (as defined below), including incentive stock options (also known as ISOs) within the meaning of Section 422 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, to qualifying plan participants who are located in the U.S. or who are U.S. taxpayers. As of December 31, 2010, our board of directors had authorized the issuance of an aggregate of up to 56,160,562 of our ordinary shares under the 2003 Plan. A general description of the terms of the 2003 Plan is set forth below.
Types of Awards.Awards that can be granted under the 2003 Plan consist of:
| • | | our ordinary shares, |
|
| • | | options to purchase our ordinary shares, |
|
| • | | dividend equivalent rights, the value of which is measured by the dividends paid with respect to our ordinary shares, |
102
| • | | stock appreciation rights the value of which is measured by appreciation in the value of our ordinary shares, and |
|
| • | | any other securities the value of which is derived from the value of our ordinary shares and which can be settled for cash, our ordinary shares or other securities or a combination of cash, our ordinary shares or other securities. |
Plan Administration.Our nominating and compensation committee, pursuant to delegated authority, currently administers the 2003 Plan.
Eligibility.Under the 2003 Plan, awards may be issued to employees, directors or consultants of our company or our subsidiaries, although ISOs may only be issued to our employees or the employees of our subsidiaries.
Acceleration of Awards upon Corporate Transactions or Changes in Control.The 2003 Plan provides for acceleration of awards upon the occurrence of specified corporate transactions or changes in control. In the event of certain corporate transactions, including specified types of reorganizations and acquisition transactions, each outstanding award granted under the 2003 Plan will automatically become fully vested and exercisable and be released from any restrictions on transfer (other than transfer restrictions applicable to the award) and repurchase or forfeiture rights immediately prior to the specified effective date of the corporate transaction, unless the award is assumed by the successor company or its parent company in connection with the corporate transaction. Upon consummation of the corporate transaction, each outstanding award will be terminated unless the award is assumed by the successor company or its parent company. Assumed options automatically become fully vested and exercisable if the grantee is terminated by the successor company without cause within 12 months of the corporate transaction. The above excludes any such transaction or series of related transactions that the administrator determines shall not be a corporate transaction.
In the event of a change in control of our company (other than a change in control which is also a specified corporate transaction described in the paragraph above), and upon the termination of the continuous service of a grantee without cause by us or our related parties (including our subsidiaries or other entities in which we or our subsidiaries hold a substantial ownership interest) within 12 months after such change in control, the grantee’s awards will become fully vested and exercisable and be released from any repurchase or forfeiture rights (other than repurchase rights exercisable at fair market value).
The administrator determined that the investment by MNC in April 2008 did not constitute a corporate transaction under the 2003 Plan.
Evergreen Provision.The 2003 Plan includes a mechanism for an automatic annual increase in the number of ordinary shares available under the plan equal to the lesser of 2.5% of the total shares outstanding or 15,175,000 ordinary shares. This mechanism is known as an “evergreen provision.” Pursuant to the evergreen provision, as of January 1, 2011 the number of ordinary shares available under the 2003 Plan increased by 10,528,253 shares, resulting in a total of 66,688,815 shares authorized for issuance under the 2003 Plan.
Awards.Awards under the 2003 Plan are evidenced by an award agreement which contains, among other things, provisions concerning exercisability and forfeiture upon termination of employment or consulting arrangement (by reason of death, disability, retirement or otherwise) as have been determined by our board. In addition, in the case of stock options the award agreement also specifies whether the option constitutes an ISO or a non-qualified stock option (also known as NQSOs) and may, but need not, include a provision whereby a grantee at any time during his or her employment with us may exercise any part or all of the award prior to full vesting of the award.
103
Exercise Price and Term of Stock Options.An option may be exercised when a holder delivers a written notice of such exercise to us. The option price to exercise the option for our ordinary shares must be paid at the time of exercise in full by cash, check or whole ordinary shares with a fair market value at least equal to the option price (or in another appropriate manner approved by us, such as in a combination of cash and whole ordinary shares or by cashless exercise of options through a broker-dealer).
Under the 2003 Plan, the exercise price for the options is specified in the award agreement for those options. In any event, the exercise price of ISOs cannot be less than the fair market value of our ordinary shares on the date of grant. However, in the case of an ISO granted to a grantee, who, at the time the ISO was granted, owned stock possessing more than 10.0% of the combined voting power of all classes of our share capital, the option price may not be less than 110.0% of the fair market value of our ordinary shares on the date of grant of such ISO. To the extent that the aggregate fair market value of our ordinary shares subject to options granted as ISOs under the 2003 Plan which become exercisable for the first time by a recipient during any calendar year exceeds $100,000, then options represented by ordinary shares in excess of the $100,000 limitation shall be treated as NQSOs.
The exercise price for NQSOs is determined by the administrator of the 2003 Plan.
The term of all ISOs and NQSOs will be stated in the applicable award agreement. The term of an ISO cannot exceed 10 years. In addition, the term of an ISO granted to a person, who, at the time of grant, owns stock possessing more than 10.0% of the combined voting power of all classes of our share capital, is limited to five years from the date of the grant of the award.
Termination of Service.The period following the termination of a grantee’s employment with us during which the grantee can exercise his or her option, if any, will be provided in the award agreement, and it cannot end later than the last day of the original term of the award. Any ISO granted under the 2003 Plan, if not exercised within the time period provided by law for the exercise of ISOs following the termination of a grantee’s employment with us, shall automatically convert to a NQSO thereafter.
Amendment or Termination of 2003 Plan.Under the 2003 Plan, our board may at any time terminate, suspend, or amend the 2003 Plan in any respect, except that no termination, suspension or amendment will be effective without shareholder approval if such approval is required to comply with any law, regulation or stock exchange rule and no such change may adversely affect any award previously granted without the written consent of the recipient. The 2003 Plan will expire on the tenth anniversary of the date that it was approved by the shareholders.
2000-1 Employee Stock Option Scheme
In November 2003, our board of directors approved the 2000-1 Scheme which governs all of our stock option grants outstanding as of that date for an aggregate of 29,991,700 ordinary shares. It is anticipated that all future stock incentive awards will be granted pursuant to the 2003 Plan or any other plan which is adopted from time to time. The 2000-1 Scheme is substantially identical to the 2003 Plan in all material aspects, except for the following:
Awards.Awards granted under the 2000-1 Scheme consist only of options for our ordinary shares.
104
Evergreen Provision.The 2000-1 Scheme does not contain an evergreen provision as described above.
Exercise Price.NQSOs granted pursuant to the 2000-1 Scheme can have an exercise price of no less than 85% of the fair market value of our ordinary shares on the date of grant.
Acceleration of Awards upon Corporate Transactions or Changes in Control.The 2000-1 Scheme’s provision for acceleration of the vesting of awards upon the occurrence of specific significant corporate transactions does not depend on whether the options are assumed by the successor company or its parent company. In addition, the vesting of awards will accelerate in the event of a change in control of our company whether or not the grantee’s continuous service is terminated without cause by us or our related parties within 12 months after such change in control.
C. Board Practices
For information regarding the terms of our current directors and the period during which our officers and directors have served in their respective positions, please refer to Item 6.A. “Directors and Senior Management.”
During 2010, our board of directors met in person or by phone four times. All of the directors who were serving in office during 2010 attended all the meetings of our board of directors and its committees on which such director served after becoming a member of our board of directors. We have no specific policy with respect to director attendance at our annual general meetings of shareholders. Our board has determined that one of our directors serving in office as of December 31 2010, Mr. Hubbs, was “independent” as that term is defined in Rule 5605(a)(2) of the NASDAQ Listing Rules. As a “Controlled Company” as defined in the NASDAQ Listing Rules due to the fact that more than 50% of our voting power is held by MNC, we are exempted from the NASDAQ requirement that a majority of our directors qualify as independent directors.
Our board has two committees: the audit committee and the nominating and compensation committee.
During 2010, our audit committee held four meetings. As of December 31, 2010, the sole member of our audit committee was Thomas Hubbs (Chairperson), who was a non-employee director as such term is defined in Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act. Our board of directors has determined that the member of our audit committee is “independent” as that term is defined in Rule 5605(a)(2) of the NASDAQ Listing Rules. Our board has further determined that Mr. Hubbs was an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by applicable rules of the SEC.
Our board of directors has adopted a written audit committee charter pursuant to which our audit committee is responsible for overseeing the accounting and financial reporting processes of our company, including the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of our independent auditors, monitoring compliance with our accounting and financial policies and evaluating management’s procedures and policies relative to the adequacy of our internal accounting controls.
Our nominating and compensation committee did not hold any meeting in 2010. As of December 31, 2010, the sole member of our nominating and compensation committee was Oerianto Guyandi (Chairperson). The functions of our nominating and compensation committee are to monitor the size and composition of our board of directors and consider and make recommendations to our board of directors with respect to the nomination or election of directors. This committee also reviews and makes recommendations to our board regarding our compensation policies and all forms of compensation, including annual salary and bonuses, to be provided to our executive officers and directors and reviews stock compensation arrangements for all of our other employees.
105
Our nominating and compensation committee will consider and make recommendations to our board of directors regarding any shareholder recommendations for candidates to serve on our board of directors. Our nominating and compensation committee will review periodically whether a more formal policy should be adopted. Shareholders wishing to recommend candidates for consideration by our nominating and compensation committee may do so by writing to the Vice President of Legal Affairs of Linktone Ltd. at 27/F, Building 1, Landmark Towers, 8 North East Third Ring Road, Chao Yang District, Beijing 100004, People’s Republic of China, providing the candidate’s name, biographical data and qualifications, a document indicating the candidate’s willingness to act if elected, and evidence of the nominating shareholder’s ownership of our company’s ordinary shares or ADSs at least 120 days prior to the next annual general meeting to assure time for meaningful consideration by our nominating and compensation committee. There are no differences in the manner in which our nominating and compensation committee evaluates nominees for director based on whether the nominee is recommended by a shareholder. We currently do not pay any third party to identify or assist in identifying or evaluating potential nominees.
No interlocking relationships have existed between our board of directors or nominating and compensation committee and the board of directors or compensation committee of any other company.
D. Employees
As of December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, we had 299, 270 and 472 full-time employees, respectively.
The following table summarizes the functional distribution of our full-time employees as of December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, | |
Department | | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2010 | |
Management | | | 2 | | | | 2 | | | | 10 | |
Sales and Marketing | | | 71 | | | | 70 | | | | 130 | |
Product Development | | | 78 | | | | 72 | | | | 90 | |
Content Development | | | — | | | | — | | | | 51 | |
Finance | | | 28 | | | | 22 | | | | 34 | |
Operations | | | — | | | | — | | | | 32 | |
Warehouse and Store | | | — | | | | — | | | | 26 | |
Technical Support | | | 52 | | | | 35 | | | | 24 | |
Customer Service | | | 31 | | | | 27 | | | | 22 | |
Legal and Administrative | | | 18 | | | | 28 | | | | 18 | |
Human Resources | | | 7 | | | | 7 | | | | 11 | |
Business Development | | | 6 | | | | 3 | | | | 6 | |
Customer Research | | | 3 | | | | 3 | | | | 6 | |
Graphics | | | — | | | | — | | | | 6 | |
Translation | | | — | | | | — | | | | 4 | |
Acquisition and Distribution | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2 | |
Investor Relations | | | 1 | | | | 1 | | | | — | |
Continuing operations | | | 297 | | | | 270 | | | | 472 | |
Discontinued operations (1) | | | 2 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 299 | | | | 270 | | | | 472 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
106
| | |
(1) | | Discontinued operations represents our advertising business which was terminated in the third quarter of 2008. The remaining employees in this business as of December 31, 2008 were focused on collecting certain account receivables related to that business. |
None of our personnel are represented under collective bargaining agreements. We consider our relations with our employees to be good.
E. Share Ownership
The following table sets forth certain information known to us with respect to the beneficial ownership as of April 30, 2011 by:
| • | | all persons who are beneficial owners of five percent or more of our ordinary shares, |
|
| • | | our current executive officers and directors, and |
|
| • | | all current directors and executive officers as a group. |
As of April 30, 2011, 421,435,030 of our ordinary shares were outstanding. The amounts and percentages of ordinary shares beneficially owned are reported on the basis of regulations of the SEC governing the determination of beneficial ownership of securities. Under the rules of the SEC, a person is deemed to be a “beneficial owner” of a security if that person has or shares “voting power,” which includes the power to vote or to direct the voting of such security, or “investment power,” which includes the power to dispose of or to direct the disposition of such security. A person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any securities of which that person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days. Under these rules, more than one person may be deemed a beneficial owner of securities as to which such person has no economic interest. To our knowledge and unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes that follow, the parties named below have sole voting and dispositive powers over the shares beneficially owned by them as of April 30, 2011:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Number of Ordinary Shares | |
| | Beneficially Owned | |
Name and Address of Beneficial Owners | | Number | | | Percentage | |
5% or more shareholders | | | | | | | | |
MNC International Limited (1) | | | 245,000,000 | | | | 58.1 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Executive Officers, Directors and Director Nominees(2) | | | | | | | | |
Hary Tanoesoedibjo (1) | | | 245,000,000 | | | | 58.1 | % |
Oerianto Guyandi | | | — | | | | — | |
Peck Joo Tan | | | — | | | | — | |
Billy Hsieh | | | — | | | | — | |
| | |
(1) | | Represents ordinary shares held by MNC International Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of MNC. MNC is an integrated media company in Indonesia and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of MNC. Hary Tanoesoedibjo is the Chief Executive Officer of MNC and a director of MNC International Limited and he disclaims beneficial ownership of these ordinary shares. The address of MNC International Limited is in c/o Bridge Street Services Limited, Marque Place, Suite 300, 430 West Bay Road, P.O. Box 30691, Grand Cayman KYI-1203, Cayman Islands. |
|
(2) | | The address of our current executive officers and directors is c/o Linktone Ltd., Unit C-D, 10F Long Life Building, 1566 West Yan An Road, Shanghai 200052, People’s Republic of China. |
107
As of April 30, 2011, based on public filings with the SEC, there are no major shareholders holding 5% or more of our ordinary shares or ADSs representing ordinary shares, except as described above.
As of April 30, 2011, approximately 227,083 of our ordinary shares were held by 18 U.S. holders of record, excluding shares held by our ADS depositary bank, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., on behalf of our ADS holders. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. has advised us that as of that date, 23,886,820 ADSs representing 238,868,200 ordinary shares were held of record by the depositary. We have no further information as to ordinary shares held, or beneficially owned, by U.S. persons.
Our major shareholders do not have different voting rights from each other or other shareholders of our company.
To our knowledge, except as disclosed above, we are not owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by another corporation, by any foreign government or by any other natural or legal person or persons, severally or jointly.
To our knowledge, there are no arrangements the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in us undergoing a change in control.
| | |
Item 7. | | Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions |
A. Major Shareholders
Please refer to Item 6.E. “Directors, Senior Management and Employees — Share Ownership.”
B. Related Party Transactions
See Item 4.A. “Information on the Company—History and Development of the Company” and Item 5. “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Our Corporate Structure” and “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Arrangements with Consolidated Affiliates” for information regarding our corporate structure and our arrangements with our consolidated affiliates.
Our primary internal source of funds is dividend payments from our subsidiaries. However, Chinese legal restrictions permit payment of dividends only out of net income as determined in accordance with Chinese accounting standards and regulations. Under Chinese law, Linktone Consulting, Huitong, Linktone Internet, Linktone Software, Wang You, Ruida and Xintong are also required to set aside a portion of their net income each year to fund certain reserve funds. These reserves are not distributable as cash dividends. Dividends paid to us by Brilliant and Beijing Ojava, which were incorporated in the British Virgin Islands, Noveltech and Linktone Media, which were incorporated in Hong Kong, and Linktone International, which was incorporated in United Arab Emirates, are not subject to tax.
In October 2008, we entered into a loan agreement in the principal amount of SGD11.5 million ($9.0 million) to GLD Investments Pte. Ltd., or GLD, a limited liability company incorporated in Singapore which was 10% owned by Hary Tanoesoedibjo, one of the directors of our board and our chief executive officer, and 90% owned by the holding company of MNC. GLD’s principal asset is a commercial office building in Singapore. In June 2010, our newly acquired subsidiary in Singapore, InnoForm, acquired a 98.7% interest in GLD from its shareholders for a total consideration of SGD13.0 million ($9.3 million). Concurrently, such loan was repaid by GLD Mr. Tanoesoedibjo holds the remaining 1.3% of the equity interest in GLD. InnoForm has used the commercial office building of GLD as its principal office premise since the acquisition. InnoForm did not pay rent for the use of the office building in 2010.
108
In April 2009, we entered into separate agreements with each of PT MNC Sky Vision, or Sky Vision, a limited liability company incorporated in the Republic of Indonesia and an affiliate of MNC, and Humax Co., Ltd., or Humax, a Korean-based equipment vendor. Sky Vision is a satellite television station in Indonesia and provides satellite television to subscribers. Pursuant to the relevant agreements, Sky Vision purchased certain set-up boxes from Humax under a supply agreement for a total amount of $2.1 million. Humax assigned its receivable for this equipment from Sky Vision to us at a discounted value of $1.9 million. We paid such amount to Humax in five installments in June and July 2009. Sky Vision agreed to repay us the principal of $1.9 million in installments one year after we made our installment payments to Humax plus interest at a rate of 10% on such principal amount payable on a quarterly basis. Pursuant to a fiduciary guarantee deed dated April 29, 2009, such amount was secured by Sky Vision accounts receivable of 25,000 subscribers or equivalent to 2 times of such amount. In July 2010, the loan and interest receivable were fully repaid by Sky Vision.
In July 2009, we entered into a technical assistance agreement with GTS Far East Ltd., or GTS Far East, a limited liability company incorporated in United Arab Emirates and an affiliate of MNC, for technical advisory services to be rendered by our company to GTS Far East’s VAS operation in the Republic of Indonesia for a monthly fee of $100,000. This agreement may be terminated upon, among other things, the parties’ mutual agreement and a party’s breach of the agreement. We earned a total fee of $0.7 million for services rendered in 2009. This agreement was terminated in December 2009.
In September 2009, we signed an exclusive multi-year licensing agreement with MLB Advance Media, L.P., or MLBAM, an interactive media and internet company of U.S. Major League Baseball or MLB. Under the terms of Linktone MLBAM agreement, Linktone became the exclusive licensee of certain MLB-related interactive media rights in South Korea, China (including Hong Kong and Macau), Indonesia and the Philippines. Such partnership was restructured in April 2010, and as a result, Allied Pacific Sports Baseball Network Limited, or APBNL, in which Linktone holds a direct 45% equity interest and an indirect interest through its 30% equity interest in such other party’s other shareholder, Allied Pacific Sports Network Limited or APSN, became MLBAM’s licensee and the licensed territory was expanded to include Thailand, Singapore and Vietnam. Simultaneously, the Linktone MLBAM agreement was mutually terminated by both parties and mutually released each other from all rights and obligations as set out in that agreement. We entered into an agreement with APSN to distribute MLBAM content via VAS in China. We also advanced a loan of $1.25 million to APSN and APBNL, 50% of which was to be repayable at the end of 2011 and 2012. Because this business did not deliver the expected results in China, the project was subsequently terminated, and we recorded an impairment provision in 2010 of $1.3 million with respect to the loan as it was deemed unlikely to be collectible.
In January 2010, Weilan acquired a 50.01% interest in Letang from its sole equityholder, Hefei Baofeng Cartoon Information Technology Co., Ltd., or Baofeng, in exchange for consideration of RMB17.5 million (US$2.6 million) and a contribution of RMB5.0 million (US$0.7 million) to the registered capital of Letang. We also agreed to pay additional cash consideration of up to RMB45.1 million (US$6.6 million) to Baofang if Letang achieves certain after-tax net profit targets between January 1, 2010 and March 31, 2012. As of December 31, 2010, we owed RMB24.4 million (US$3.6 million) to Baofeng as additional consideration because it achieved its initial after-tax net profit targets. The primary purpose of the acquisition was to strengthen our company’s mobile games portfolio and development capabilities. Concurrent with our investment in Letang, we entered into an equityholders
109
agreement with Baofeng and Letang which contains various provisions regarding the corporate governance of Letang, including the holding of shareholder meetings, the composition and rights of the board of directors of Letang, information rights in favor of our company and the maintenance of books and records by Letang. The equityholders agreement also imposes restrictions on the equityholders’ transfer of their equity interest in Letang, subject to certain exceptions. Letang agreed that if it issues any new equity, then we and Baofeng each have the right to purchase our pro rata percentage of such new issuance. In addition, we have a right of first refusal over any proposed transfers of the equity held by Baofeng. These rights will terminate when we or Baofeng no longer hold any equity of Letang or when there is an initial public offering of the equity of Letang.
In March 2010, we and MNC (through MIMEL) acquired 50% and 25% of the share capital of InnoForm respectively, for an aggregate consideration of SGD9.9 million (US$7.0 million)in cash. In June 2010, we subscribed for additional new shares of InnoForm for a total consideration of SGD13.0 million (US$9.3 million) and as a result of which we and MNC (through MIMEL) hold 75% and 12.5% of the equity interest of InnoForm, respectively. MNC (through MIMEL) also has the option to purchase the remaining 12.5% of the outstanding share capital of InnoForm, whereby 7.5% and 5% of the share capital can be purchased within 18 months and 30 months, respectively, of the agreement date. InnoForm is a Singapore-based company with regional offices in Malaysia and Hong Kong, specializing in the development, distribution and licensing of edutainment and entertainment products.
In June 2010, we purchased mandatory convertible bonds issued by IDN (which has been renamed PT Linktone) from Starlight, a company incorporated under the laws of United Arab Emirates and the bond holder of PT Linktone, which bonds could be converted into 51% of the outstanding share capital of PT Linktone for a total consideration of $13.2 million. The bonds were interest-free and were converted into shares of PT Linktone in September 2010. We currently own 51% of the outstanding shares of PT Linktone, with the remaining held by MNC Group. The purpose of the acquisition was in line with our expansion strategy in the region. Of the $13.2 million consideration for the bonds, we paid $8.6 million in June 2010, and we plan to pay the remaining $4.6 million in the near future.
Prior to our acquisition of PT Linktone, it had entered into a cooperation agreement in October 2009 (as amended in February 2010) with Infokom, an affiliate of MNC. Under this agreement, PT Linktone is authorized to use short codes owned by Infokom to offer its VAS to users in Indonesia in exchange for 10% of the revenue generated from such services, net of the fees charged by the telecom network operators. This agreement has a term of 25 years from the date of the agreement. In October 2009, PT Linktone also entered into a cooperation agreement with MNC for the rights to a short code owned by MNC free of charge. This agreement has a term of 25 years from the date of the agreement. From September 1, 2010 (the date of our acquisition of PT Linktone for accounting purposes) to December 31, 2010, PT Linktone’s total revenue generated from the use of short codes owned by Infokom and those owned by MNC was $1.6 million and $0.3 million, respectively. During this period, PT Linktone paid Infokom and MNC a total of $0.3 million and nil, respectively. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects — Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates — Revenue and Cost of Revenue Recognition — Indonesia telecom value — added services.”
In October 2009, PT Linktone entered into another cooperation agreement with MNC whereby MNC agreed to promote PT Linktone’s products, programs or content on three television stations owned by MNC — PT Rajawali Citra Televisi Indonesia (“RCTI”), PT Cipta Televisi Pendidikan Indonesia (“MNC TV”) and PT Global Informasi Bermutu (“Global TV”). As compensation, RCTI, MNC TV and Global TV each receive a percentage of the revenue generated when customers used the short code suffix specific to their respective television program. PT Linktone also provides SMS services, such as SMS polling for each television station’s entertainment programs, in exchange for a percentage of the revenues generated by such services. The term of this agreement is five years from the date of the agreement. From September 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010, PT Linktone paid each of MNC TV and Global TV $0.1 million. Revenue generated from our cooperation with RCTI during this period was insignificant..
Through PT Linktone, we also cooperate with two print media companies within the MNC Group — PT Media Nusantara Informasi (which produces the local Indonesian newspaper,Seputar Indonesia) and PT MNI Global (which produces the tabloids,GenieandMom & Kiddie). Pursuant to this cooperation, we support their self-branded mobile applications which allow users to access newspaper and magazine content via mobile phones and other mobile devices such as the BlackBerry. We pay them a percentage of the revenues generated by such services. From September 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010, no revenue was generated from our cooperation with these print media companies.
In addition, through PT Linktone, we have a partnership with OkeZone, a news and entertainment online media provider within the MNC Group. We cooperate with them to supply news and entertainment through SMS channels. We pay OkeZone a percentage of the revenues generated by such services. From September 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010, no revenue was generated from our cooperation with OkeZone. Through PT Linktone, we also cooperate with Star Media Nusantara, or Star Media, a company within the MNC Group, to provide SMS communities for particular artists and talents. These communities offer information and tips, photos and video from the particular artists for their fans. We pay Star Media a percentage of the revenues generated by such services. From September 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010, the revenue generated pursuant to this cooperation was insignificant.
In July 2010, RCTI, jointly with Sky Vision, secured the license rights to broadcast in Indonesia the UEFA EURO 2012, UEFA EURO 2016, UEFA European Under 21 Championships and UEFA Women’s Euro events (together, the “UEFA Programs”). In November 2010, RCTI signed a Memorandum of Understanding, or MOU, with PT Linktone, appointing PT Linktone as the sublicensee to develop and distribute mobile content for the UEFA Programs to end users within Indonesia. As compensation, PT Linktone will pay a license fee to RCTI in an amount to be agreed to by both parties. As a commitment for the performance of the MOU, PT Linktone paid an advance of IDR3.3 billion (US$0.4 million) to RCTI. This advance payment will be deducted from the license fee to be agreed and payable to RCTI.
In December 2010, we purchased US$20 million of senior secured notes of Aerospace Satellite Corporation Holding B.V., or Aerospace, a wholly owned subsidiary of Sky Vision. The notes trade on Singapore Exchange Ltd., are due November 16, 2015, bear interest at a rate of 12.75% per annum and are payable semi-annually in arrears. The notes are guaranteed by Sky Vision. In March 2011, we sold US$10 million of these notes in the open market with a gain of approximately 2% over the original purchase price. Utilizing our proceeds from the sale of the Aerospace notes and the interest earned on such notes, we acquired stake of less than one percent in PT Global Mediacom Tbk., or Global Mediacom (the controlling shareholder of MNC), through the open market purchase of 116 million common shares at IDR800 (approximately US$0.092) per share. Global Mediacom is Indonesia’s largest integrated media company, operating the country’s leading free-to-air and pay television services.
110
C. Interests of Experts and Counsel
Not applicable.
| | |
Item 8. | | Financial Information |
A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information
See Item 18. “Financial Statements” for our audited consolidated financial statements filed as part of this annual report.
A.7 Legal Proceedings
We are not involved in any legal matters that management believes will have a material adverse effect on our business.
A.8 Dividend Policy
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our ordinary shares, but it is possible that we may declare dividends in the future. We have historically retained earnings to finance operations and the expansion of our business. Any future determination to pay cash dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will be dependent upon our financial condition, operating results, capital requirements and such other factors as our board of directors deems relevant.
B. Significant Changes
See Item 18. “Financial Statements” for information regarding significant changes to us since December 31, 2009.
111
| | |
Item 9. | | The Offer and Listing |
Not applicable except for Item 9.A.4. and Item 9.C.
Our ADSs, each representing 10 of our ordinary shares, have been listed on the NASDAQ Global Market since March 4, 2004 and trade under the symbol “LTON.”
The following table provides the high and low prices for our ADSs on the NASDAQ Global Market for the periods indicated.
| | | | | | | | |
| | Price Per ADS (US$) | |
| | High | | | Low | |
Annual highs and lows | | | | | | | | |
2006 | | | 10.92 | | | | 3.56 | |
2007 | | | 5.40 | | | | 2.03 | |
2008 | | | 3.58 | | | | 0.57 | |
2009 | | | 3.21 | | | | 1.01 | |
2010 | | | 2.07 | | | | 1.20 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Quarterly highs and lows | | | | | | | | |
First Quarter 2009 | | | 1.66 | | | | 1.01 | |
Second Quarter 2009 | | | 3.04 | | | | 1.40 | |
Third Quarter 2009 | | | 2.60 | | | | 1.81 | |
Fourth Quarter 2009 | | | 3.21 | | | | 1.67 | |
First Quarter 2010 | | | 2.07 | | | | 1.64 | |
Second Quarter 2010 | | | 1.75 | | | | 1.20 | |
Third Quarter 2010 | | | 1.81 | | | | 1.25 | |
Fourth Quarter 2010 | | | 1.74 | | | | 1.31 | |
First Quarter 2011 | | | 1.77 | | | | 1.31 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Monthly highs and lows | | | | | | | | |
December 2010 | | | 2.02 | | | | 1.47 | |
January 2011 | | | 1.77 | | | | 1.45 | |
February 2011 | | | 1.65 | | | | 1.40 | |
March 2011 | | | 1.61 | | | | 1.31 | |
April 2011 | | | 1.39 | | | | 1.18 | |
May 2011 | | | 1.27 | | | | 0.97 | |
| | |
Item 10. | | Additional Information |
A. Share Capital
Not applicable.
B. Memorandum and Articles of Association
We are a Cayman Islands exempted company and our affairs are governed by our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association and the Companies Law. The following are summaries of material provisions of our new amended and restated memorandum and articles of association and the Companies Law insofar as they relate to the material terms of our ordinary shares.
112
Directors
Interested Transactions.A director may vote in respect of any contract or transaction in which he is interested, provided however that the nature of the interest of any director in any such contract or transaction shall be disclosed by him at or prior to its consideration and any vote on that matter. A general notice or disclosure to the directors or otherwise contained in the minutes of a meeting or a written resolution of the directors or any committee thereof that a director is a shareholder of any specified firm or company and is to be regarded as interested in any transaction with such firm or company shall be sufficient disclosure and after such general notice it shall not be necessary to give special notice relating to any particular transaction.
Remuneration and Borrowing.The directors may determine remuneration to be paid to the directors, including in the absence of an independent quorum. The directors may exercise all the powers of our company to borrow money and to mortgage or charge its undertaking, property and uncalled capital or any part thereof, to issue debentures, debenture stock and other securities whenever money is borrowed or as security for any of our debts, liabilities, or obligations or those of any third party.
Qualifications.There are no membership qualifications for directors. Further, there are no share ownership qualifications for directors unless so fixed by us in a general meeting.
Classes of Directors.The directors are divided into three classes, as nearly equal in number as the then total number of directors permits. At each annual general meeting of shareholders, successors to the class of directors whose terms expire at that meeting shall be elected for a three-year term.
If the number of directors changes, any increase or decrease will be apportioned among the classes so as to maintain the number of directors in each class as nearly as possible. Any additional directors of a class elected to fill a vacancy resulting from an increase in such class will hold office for a term that coincides with the remaining term of that class. Decreases in the number of directors will not shorten the term of any incumbent director.
Nonetheless, whenever the holders of preferred shares have the right, voting separately as a class, to elect directors, the election, term of office, filling of vacancies and other features of directorships will be governed by the applicable terms of our articles of association and the rights attaching to those preferred shares.
These board provisions could make it more difficult for third parties to gain control of our company by making it difficult to replace members of the board.
Rights, Preferences and Restrictions of our Ordinary Shares
General.All of our outstanding ordinary shares are fully paid and nonassessable. Certificates representing our ordinary shares are issued in registered form. Our shareholders who are nonresidents of the Cayman Islands may freely hold and vote their shares.
Dividends.The holders of our ordinary shares are entitled to such dividends as may be declared by our board of directors.
Voting Rights.Each ordinary share is entitled to one vote on all matters upon which our ordinary shares are entitled to vote, including the election of directors. Voting at any meeting of shareholders is by show of hands unless a poll is demanded. A poll may be demanded by our Chairman or any other shareholder present in person or by proxy. A quorum required for a meeting of shareholders consists of shareholders who hold at least one-third of our outstanding shares entitled to vote at the meeting present in person or by proxy.
113
Any ordinary resolution to be made by the shareholders requires the affirmative vote of a simple majority of the votes attaching to our ordinary shares cast in a general meeting, while a special resolution requires the affirmative vote of no less than two-thirds of the votes cast attaching to our ordinary shares. A special resolution is required for matters such as a change of name. Holders of our ordinary shares may by ordinary resolution, among other things, elect directors, appoint auditors, and make changes in the amount of our authorized share capital.
Liquidation.On a return of capital on winding up or otherwise (other than on conversion, redemption or purchase of our ordinary shares) assets available for distribution among the holders of our ordinary shares shall be distributed among the holders of our ordinary shares pro rata. If the assets available for distribution are insufficient to repay all of the paid-up capital, the assets will be distributed so that the losses are borne by our shareholders proportionately.
Calls on our Ordinary Shares and Forfeiture of our Ordinary Shares.Our board of directors may from time to time make calls upon shareholders for any amounts unpaid on their ordinary shares in a notice served to such shareholders at least 14 days prior to the specified time and place of payment. Our ordinary shares that have been called upon and remain unpaid are subject to forfeiture.
Redemption of our Ordinary Shares.We may issue shares that are, or at our option or at the option of the holders are, subject to redemption on such terms and in such manner as we may, before the issue of the shares, determine by special resolution.
Preferred Shares
Our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association provide for the authorization of preferred shares. The preferred shares may be issued from time to time at the discretion of the board of directors without shareholder approval. The board of directors is authorized to issue these shares in different classes and series and, with respect to each class or series, to determine the dividend rate, the redemption provisions, conversion provisions, liquidation preference and other rights and privileges not in conflict with our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association. We have no immediate plans to issue any preferred shares. The issuance of any of our preferred shares could provide needed flexibility in connection with possible acquisitions and other corporate purposes. However, the issuance could also make it more difficult for a third party to acquire a majority of our outstanding voting shares or discourage an attempt to gain control of us. In addition, the board of directors, without shareholder approval, can issue preferred shares with voting and conversion rights which could adversely affect the voting power and other rights of the holders of ordinary shares. These preferred shares may be used for a variety of corporate purposes, including future public offerings, to raise additional capital or to facilitate acquisitions.
Variations of Rights of Shares
All or any of the special rights attached to any class of shares may, subject to the provisions of the Companies Law, be varied either with the consent in writing of the holders of three-fourths of the issued shares of that class or with the sanction of a special resolution passed at a general meeting of the holders of the shares of that class.
Related Party Transactions
Any related party transaction or series of related party transactions with the same or similar subject matter(s) or business purpose(s), in either case with an aggregate value in excess of US$5 million, must first be approved by a majority of the disinterested directors of our board pursuant to a board resolution.
114
General Meetings of Shareholders
The directors may whenever they think fit, and they shall on the requisition of our shareholders holding at the date of the deposit of the requisition not less than one-tenth of our paid-up capital as at the date of the deposit carries the right of voting at our general meetings, proceed to convene a general meeting of our Company. If the directors do not within 21 days from the date of the deposit of the requisition duly proceed to convene a general meeting, the requisitionists, or any of them representing more than one-half of the total voting rights of all of them, may themselves convene a general meeting, but any meeting so convened shall not be held after the expiration of three months after the expiration of such 21 days. Advance notice of at least five days is required for the convening of the annual general meeting and other shareholders meetings.
Limitations on the Right to Own Shares
There are no limitations on the right to own our shares.
Limitations on Transfer of Shares
There are no provisions in our amended and restated memorandum or articles of association that would have an effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control and that would operate only with respect to a merger, acquisition or corporate restructuring.
Disclosure of Shareholder Ownership
There are no provisions in our amended and restated memorandum or articles of association governing the ownership threshold above which shareholder ownership must be disclosed.
Changes in Capital
We may from time to time by ordinary resolution increase the share capital by such sum, to be divided into shares of such amount, as the resolution shall prescribe. The new shares shall be subject to the same provisions with reference to the payment of calls, lien, transfer, transmission, forfeiture and otherwise as the shares in the original share capital. We may by ordinary resolution:
| (a) | | consolidate and divide all or any of our share capital into shares of larger amount than our existing shares; |
|
| (b) | | sub-divide our existing shares, or any of them into shares of smaller amount than is fixed by our amended and restated memorandum of association, subject nevertheless to the provisions of Section 12 of the Companies Law; or |
|
| (c) | | cancel any shares which, at the date of the passing of the resolution, have not been taken or agreed to be taken by any person. |
We may by special resolution reduce our share capital and any capital redemption reserve fund in any manner authorized by law.
115
Differences in Corporate Law
The Companies Law is modeled after that of the United Kingdom but does not follow recent United Kingdom statutory enactments, and differs from laws applicable to United States corporations and their shareholders. Set forth below is a summary of the significant differences between the provisions of the Companies Law applicable to us and the laws applicable to companies incorporated in the United States and their shareholders.
Mergers and Similar Arrangements.The Companies Law provides that any two or more Cayman Islands companies limited by shares (other than segregated portfolio companies) may merge or consolidate in accordance with the Companies Law. The Companies Law also allows one or more Cayman Islands companies to merge or consolidate with one or more foreign companies (provided that the laws of the foreign jurisdiction permit such merger or consolidation). To effect a merger or consolidation of one or more Cayman Islands companies the directors of each constituent company must approve a written plan of merger or consolidation in accordance with the Companies Law. The plan of merger must then be authorized by each constituent company by a special resolution of members and such other authorization, if any, as may be specified in such constituent company’s articles of association. Where a Cayman Islands parent is merging with one or more of its Cayman Islands subsidiaries, shareholder consent is not required if a copy of the plan of merger is given to every member of each subsidiary company to be merged, unless that member agrees otherwise. To effect a merger or consolidation of one or more Cayman Islands companies with one or more foreign companies, in addition to the approval requirements applicable to the merger of consolidation of Cayman Islands companies (in relation to Cayman Islands company(ies) only), the merger or consolidation must also be effected in compliance with the constitutional documents of, and laws of the foreign jurisdiction applicable to, the foreign company(ies).
In addition, there are statutory provisions that facilitate the reconstruction and amalgamation of companies, provided that the arrangement is approved by a majority in number of each class of shareholders and creditors with whom the arrangement is to be made, and who must in addition represent three-fourths in value of each such class of shareholders or creditors, as the case may be, that are present and voting either in person or by proxy at a meeting, or meetings, convened for that purpose. The convening of the meetings and subsequently the arrangement must be sanctioned by the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands. While a dissenting shareholder has the right to express to the court the view that the transaction ought not be approved, the court can be expected to approve the arrangement if it determines that:
| • | | the statutory provisions as to majority vote have been complied with; |
|
| • | | the shareholders have been fairly represented at the meeting in question; |
|
| • | | the arrangement is such as a businessman would reasonably approve; and |
|
| • | | the arrangement is not one that would more properly be sanctioned under some other provision of the Companies Law. |
When a take-over offer is made and accepted by holders of 90.0% of the shares within four months, the offeror may, within a two month period, require the holders of the remaining shares to transfer such shares on the terms of the offer. An objection can be made to the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands but this is unlikely to succeed unless there is evidence of fraud, bad faith or collusion.
If the arrangement and reconstruction is thus approved, the dissenting shareholder would have no rights comparable to appraisal rights, which would otherwise ordinarily be available to dissenting shareholders of United States corporations, providing rights to receive payment in cash for the judicially determined value of the shares.
116
Shareholders’ Suits.Our Cayman Islands counsel is not aware of any reported class action or derivative action having been brought in a Cayman Islands court. In principle, we will normally be the proper plaintiff and a derivative action may not be brought by a minority shareholder. However, based on English authorities, which could be applied by a court in the Cayman Islands, exceptions to the foregoing principle apply in circumstances in which:
| • | | a company is acting or proposing to act illegally or ultra vires; |
|
| • | | the act complained of, although not ultra vires, could be effected only if authorized by more than a simple majority vote; |
|
| • | | the individual rights of the plaintiff shareholder have been infringed or are about to be infringed; or |
|
| • | | those who control the company are perpetrating a “fraud on the minority.” |
Indemnification.Cayman Islands law does not (other than as set forth hereafter) limit the extent to which a company’s organizational documents may provide for indemnification of officers and directors, except to the extent any such provision may be held by the Cayman Islands courts to be contrary to public policy, such as to provide indemnification against civil fraud or the consequences of committing a crime. Our Articles of Association provide for indemnification of officers and directors for losses, damages, costs and expenses incurred in their capacities as such, except through their own willful neglect or default.
C. Material Contracts
We have not entered into any material contracts other than in the ordinary course of business and other than those described in Item 4. “Information on the Company” and Item 7.B. “Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions — Related Party Transactions” or elsewhere in this annual report.
D. Exchange Controls
China’s government imposes control over the convertibility of Renminbi into foreign currencies. Under the current unified floating exchange rate system, the People’s Bank of China publishes a daily exchange rate for Renminbi, or the PBOC Exchange Rate, based on the previous day’s dealings in the inter-bank foreign exchange market. Financial institutions authorized to deal in foreign currency may enter into foreign exchange transactions at exchange rates within an authorized range above or below the PBOC Exchange Rate according to market conditions.
Pursuant to the Foreign Exchange Control Regulations issued by the State Council on January 29, 1996 and effective as of April 1, 1996 (as amended on January 14, 1997 and further amended on August 5, 2008) and the Administration of Settlement, Sale and Payment of Foreign Exchange Regulations which came into effect on July 1, 1996, or the Regulations, conversion of Renminbi into foreign exchange by foreign investment enterprises for current account items, including the distribution of dividends and profits to foreign investors of joint ventures, is permissible. Foreign investment enterprises are permitted to remit foreign exchange from their foreign exchange bank account in China on the basis of, inter alia, the terms of the relevant joint venture contracts and board resolutions declaring the distribution of the dividend and payment of profits. Conversion of Renminbi into foreign currencies and remittance of foreign currencies for capital account items, including direct investment, loans and security investment, is still subject to the approval of SAFE, in each such transaction.
117
Under the Regulations, foreign investment enterprises are required to open and maintain separate foreign exchange accounts for capital account items (but not for other items). In addition, foreign investment enterprises may only buy, sell and/or remit foreign currencies at those banks authorized to conduct foreign exchange business upon the production of valid commercial documents and, in the case of capital account item transactions, document approval from SAFE.
Currently, foreign investment enterprises are required to apply to SAFE for “foreign exchange registration IC cards for foreign investment enterprises.” With such foreign exchange registration IC cards (which are granted to foreign investment enterprises upon fulfilling specified conditions and which are subject to review and renewal by SAFE on an annual basis) or with the foreign exchange sales notices from the SAFE (which are obtained on a transaction-by-transaction basis), foreign-invested enterprises may enter into foreign exchange transactions at banks authorized to conduct foreign exchange business to obtain foreign exchange for their needs.
In addition, pursuant to regulations recently promulgated by SAFE, PRC subsidiaries of offshore parent companies may be prohibited from making distributions of profits to such offshore parent companies and from paying the offshore parent companies proceeds from any reduction in capital, share transfer or liquidation in respect of such PRC subsidiaries, if PRC shareholders with a direct or indirect stake in the offshore parent company fail to make the required SAFE registrations.
These new regulations require PRC residents to file with the competent SAFE offices information about offshore companies in which they have directly or indirectly invested (including with respect to investments already made as of the inception of the new regulation) and to make follow-up filings in connection with certain material transaction involving such offshore companies, such as mergers or acquisitions, capital increases or decreases, and external equity investments or equity transfers. For additional information on the new SAFE regulations and the related risks to our company, see Item 3.D. “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Doing Business in China — Chinese regulations relating to acquisitions of Chinese companies by foreign entities may limit our ability to acquire Chinese companies and adversely affect the implementation of our acquisition strategy as well as our business and prospects.”
Although the Monetary Authority of Singapore monitors the Singapore dollar currency, there is no foreign exchange control in Singapore. No approval is required for any payment, remittance or capital transfer in any currency or to any country. During 2010, the average rate of Singapore dollar to the U.S. dollar was SGD1.3629 with the highest and lowest rates being SGD1.4217 and SGD1.2847, respectively.
Foreign exchange controls in Indonesia were abolished in 1971. Indonesia operates a liberal foreign exchange system that permits the free flow of foreign exchange. Capital transactions, including remittances of capital, profits, dividends and interest are free of exchange controls. A number of regulations, however, have an impact on the exchange system. For example, only banks are authorized to deal in foreign exchange and execute exchange transactions related to the import and export of goods. In addition, Indonesian banks (including branches of foreign banks in Indonesia) are required to report to Bank Indonesia any fund transfers exceeding US$10,000. Bank Indonesia holds the authority to issue rupiah currency and has the responsibility for maintaining the stability of the Indonesian rupiah. During 2010, the average rate of rupiah to the U.S. dollar was IDR9,085 with the highest and lowest rates being IDR9,413 and IDR8,888, respectively. Recently, however, there have been media reports that Bank Indonesia will announce measures on capital flows to control the frequent inflow and outflow of short-term funds. Accordingly, the imposition of foreign exchange controls in Indonesia is a possibility, but we cannot be sure when, or if, such controls will be imposed in the future.
118
E. Taxation
The following summary of the material Cayman Islands, People’s Republic of China and United States federal income tax consequences relevant to the purchase, ownership or sale of our ADSs is based upon laws and relevant interpretations thereof in effect as of the date of this annual report, all of which are subject to change. The summary does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the tax considerations that may be relevant to any particular investor depending on its individual circumstances. Accordingly, beneficial owners of shares should consult their own tax advisors regarding the application of the considerations discussed below to their particular situations and the consequences, including U.S. federal estate or gift tax laws, foreign, state, or local laws, and tax treaties.
Cayman Islands Taxation
There is, at present, no direct taxation in the Cayman Islands, and interest, dividends and gains payable to our company will be received free of all Cayman Islands taxes. We are registered as an “exempted company” pursuant to the Companies Law. We have received an undertaking from the Governor in Cabinet of the Cayman Islands to the effect that, for a period of twenty years from such date, no law that thereafter is enacted in the Cayman Islands imposing any tax or duty to be levied on profits, income or on gains or appreciation, or any tax in the nature of estate duty or inheritance tax, will apply to any property comprised in or any income arising under our company, or to the Shareholders thereof, in respect of any such property or income. There are no exchange control regulations or currency restrictions in the Cayman Islands.
People’s Republic of China Taxation
PRC taxation of us and our corporate group
We are a holding company incorporated in the Cayman Islands and conduct our business in China solely through our wholly owned subsidiaries. The new EIT Law and its implementation rules, both of which became effective on January 1, 2008, provide that China-sourced income of foreign enterprises, such as dividends paid by a PRC subsidiary to its overseas parent, will normally be subject to PRC withholding tax at a rate of 10.0%, unless there are applicable treaties that reduce such rate. Under a special arrangement between China and Hong Kong, such dividend withholding tax rate is reduced to 5.0% if a Hong Kong resident enterprise owns over 25% of the PRC company distributing the dividends.
Under the new EIT Law, enterprises established under the laws of jurisdictions outside China with their “de factomanagement bodies” located within China may be considered to be PRC tax resident enterprises for tax purposes. If we are considered a PRC tax resident enterprise under the above definition, then our global income will be subject to PRC enterprise income tax at the rate of 25.0%. See Item 3.D. “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to Doing Business in China — Any changes to our tax incentives could have a material adverse effect on our operating results. Our foreign ADS holders may be subject to PRC withholding tax on the dividends payable by us and upon gains realized on their sales of our ADSs if we are classified as a PRC “resident enterprise.”
119
PRC taxation of our overseas shareholders
The implementation rules of the new EIT Law provide that (i) if the enterprise that distributes dividends is domiciled in the PRC, or (ii) if gains are realized from transferring equity interests of enterprises domiciled in the PRC, then such dividends or capital gains are treated as China-sourced income. It is not clear how “domicile” may be interpreted under the new EIT Law, and it may be interpreted as the jurisdiction where the enterprise is a tax resident. Therefore, if we are considered as a PRC tax resident enterprise for tax purposes, any dividends we pay to our ADS holders as well as gains realized by our ADS holders from the transfer of ADSs may be regarded as China-sourced income and as a result become subject to PRC withholding tax. For additional discussion, please see Item 3.D. “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to Doing Business in China — Any changes to our tax incentives could have a material adverse effect on our operating results. Our foreign ADS holders may be subject to PRC withholding tax on the dividends payable by us and upon gains realized on their sales of our ADSs if we are classified as a PRC “resident enterprise.”
United States Federal Income Taxation
The following discussion is a summary of certain United States federal income tax consequences applicable to the ownership and disposition of shares or ADSs by a U.S. Holder (as defined below), but does not purport to be a complete analysis of all potential United States federal income tax effects. This summary is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), United States Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder, Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) rulings and judicial decisions in effect on the date hereof. All of these are subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect, or different interpretations.
This summary does not address all aspects of United States federal income taxation that may be relevant to particular U.S. Holders in light of their specific circumstances (for example, U.S. Holders subject to the alternative minimum tax provisions of the Code) or to holders that may be subject to special rules under United States federal income tax law, including:
| • | | dealers in stocks, securities or currencies; |
|
| • | | securities traders that use a mark-to-market accounting method; |
|
| • | | banks and financial institutions; |
|
| • | | insurance companies; |
|
| • | | regulated investment companies; |
|
| • | | real estate investment trusts; |
|
| • | | tax-exempt organizations; |
|
| • | | persons holding shares or ADSs as part of a hedging or conversion transaction or a straddle; |
|
| • | | persons deemed to sell shares or ADSs under the constructive sale provisions of the Code; |
|
| • | | persons who or that are, or may become, subject to the expatriation provisions of the Code; |
|
| • | | persons whose functional currency is not the United States dollar; and |
|
| • | | direct, indirect or constructive owners of 10% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of our voting stock. |
This summary also does not discuss any aspect of state, local or foreign law, or United States federal estate or gift tax law as applicable to U.S. Holders. In addition, this discussion is limited to U.S. Holders holding shares or ADSs as capital assets. Prospective purchasers are urged to consult their tax advisers about the United States federal, state and local tax consequences to them of the purchase, ownership and disposition of shares or ADSs.
120
For purposes of this summary, “U.S. Holder” means a beneficial holder of shares or ADSs who or that for United States federal income tax purposes is:
| • | | an individual citizen or resident of the United States; |
| • | | a corporation or other entity classified as a corporation for United States federal income tax purposes created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia; |
| • | | an estate, the income of which is subject to United States federal income taxation regardless of its source; or |
| • | | a trust, if a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of such trust and one or more “U.S. persons” (within the meaning of the Code) have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust, or if a valid election is in effect to be treated as a U.S. person. |
If a partnership or other entity or arrangement classified as a partnership for United States federal income tax purposes holds shares or ADSs, the United States federal income tax treatment of a partner generally will depend on the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. This summary does not address the tax consequences of any such partner. If you are a partner of a partnership holding shares or ADSs, you should consult your tax advisers.
The discussion below is written on the basis that the representations contained in the deposit agreement are true and that the obligations in the deposit agreement and any related agreement will be performed in accordance with the terms. If you hold ADSs, you generally will be treated as the owner of the underlying shares represented by those ADSs for United States federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, deposits or withdrawal of shares for ADSs will not be subject to United States federal income tax.
U.S. Holders
Taxation of dividends and other distributions on the shares or ADSs
As described below, we believe that we were a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”) for United States federal income tax purposes for the previously ended taxable year and may be classified as a PFIC for the current taxable year. For special rules applicable to dividends and other distributions from a PFIC, see “Passive Foreign Investment Company Considerations” below.
The following rules will apply provided that our company has not been a PFIC for any taxable year included in a U.S. Holder’s holding period for shares or ADSs. Distributions paid by our company out of current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined for United States federal income tax purposes) generally will be taxable to a U.S. Holder as foreign source dividend income, and will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction generally allowed to corporations. Distributions in excess of current and accumulated earnings and profits will be treated as a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the shares or ADSs and thereafter as capital gain. However, our company does not maintain calculations of our earnings and profits in accordance with United States federal income tax accounting principles. U.S. Holders should therefore assume that any distribution by our company with respect to the shares or ADSs will constitute dividend income. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors with respect to the appropriate United States federal income tax treatment of any distribution received from our company.
121
For taxable years beginning before January 1, 2013, dividends paid by our company should be taxable to a non-corporate U.S. Holder at the special reduced rate normally applicable to long term capital gains, provided that certain conditions are satisfied. A U.S. Holder will not be able to claim the reduced rate for any year in which our company is treated as a PFIC. See “Passive Foreign Investment Company Considerations,” below. Dividends may be taxed at the lower applicable capital gains rate provided that (1) our shares or ADSs, as applicable, are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States, (2) our company is not a PFIC (as discussed below) for either our taxable year in which the dividends were paid or the preceding taxable year, and (3) certain holding period and other requirements are met. Since our ADSs are listed on the NASDAQ Global Market, they are considered for purposes of clause (1) above to be readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States.
In the event that dividends from our company are subject to withholding by the PRC, a U.S. Holder may be eligible, subject to a number of complex limitations, to claim a foreign tax credit in respect of any foreign withholding taxes imposed on dividends received on the shares or ADSs. A U.S. Holder who does not elect to claim a foreign tax credit for foreign income tax withheld, may instead claim a deduction, for United States federal income tax purposes, in respect of such withholdings, but only for a year in which such holder elects to do so for all creditable foreign income taxes. Dividends will constitute foreign source income for United States foreign tax credit purposes.
Taxation of disposition of shares or ADSs
Subject to the PFIC rules discussed below, you will recognize taxable gain or loss on any sale or exchange of a share or ADS in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized (in U.S. dollars) for the share or ADS and your tax basis (in U.S. dollars) in the share or ADS. The gain or loss will generally be capital gain or loss and will be long-term capital gain or loss if you have held the share or ADS for more than one year. Long-term capital gains of non-corporate U.S. Holders currently are eligible for reduced rates of taxation. The deductibility of a capital loss may be subject to limitations. Any gain or loss that you recognize generally will be treated as United States source gain or loss for United States foreign tax credit purposes.
Passive foreign investment company considerations
A foreign corporation will be classified as a PFIC for any taxable year in which, after taking into account the income and assets of the corporation and certain subsidiaries pursuant to applicable “look-through rules,” either (i) at least 75 percent of its gross income is “passive income” (the “income test”) or (ii) at least 50 percent of the average value of its assets is attributable to assets which produce passive income or are held for the production of passive income (the “asset test”).
For this purpose, cash and investment securities are categorized as passive assets and our company’s unbooked intangibles are taken into account. We will be treated as owning our proportionate share of the assets and earning our proportionate share of the income of any other corporation in which we own, directly or indirectly, more than 25% (by value) of the stock.
122
We believe we were a PFIC for United States federal income tax purposes for the previously ended taxable year and may be classified as a PFIC for the current taxable year. Under the income and asset tests, whether or not we are a PFIC will be determined annually based upon the composition of our income and the composition and valuation of our assets, all of which are subject to change. In addition, in valuing our assets, we have made a number of assumptions which we believe are reasonable. However, it is possible that the IRS may disagree with these assumptions, which may affect the determination of whether we are a PFIC in a given year. Because the PFIC determination is highly fact intensive and made at the end of each taxable year, there can be no assurance that we will or will not be a PFIC for the current or any future taxable year or that the IRS will not challenge our determination concerning our PFIC status.
If our company is classified as a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. Holder owns shares or ADSs, the U.S. Holder, absent certain elections (including a mark-to-market election), will generally be subject to adverse rules (regardless of whether our company continues to be classified as a PFIC) with respect to (i) any “excess distributions” (generally, any distributions received by the U.S. Holder on the shares or ADSs in a taxable year that are greater than 125 percent of the average annual distributions received by the U.S. Holder in the three preceding taxable years or, if shorter, the U.S. Holder’s holding period for the shares or ADSs) and (ii) any gain realized on the sale or other disposition of shares or ADSs.
Under these adverse rules (a) the excess distribution or gain will be allocated ratably over the U.S. Holder’s holding period, (b) the amount allocated to the current taxable year and any taxable year prior to the first taxable year in which our company is classified as a PFIC will be taxed as ordinary income, and (c) the amount allocated to each of the other taxable years during which our company was classified as a PFIC will be subject to tax at the highest rate of tax in effect for the applicable category of taxpayer for that year and an interest charge will be imposed with respect to the resulting tax attributable to each such other taxable year.
Alternatively, a U.S. Holder may be eligible to make a mark-to-market election under Section 1296 of the Code (a “Mark-to-Market Election”), but only if our shares or ADSs are marketable stock. Our shares are not currently listed on any exchange, but our ADSs will be “marketable stock” as long as they remain listed on the NASDAQ Global Market and are regularly traded. There can be no assurances, however, that our ADSs will be treated, or continue to be treated, as regularly traded. A U.S. Holder that makes a mark-to-market election must include in ordinary income, rather than capital gain, for each year an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the shares or ADSs, as applicable, at the close of the taxable year over the U.S. Holder’s adjusted basis in the shares or ADSs. Additional complex rules apply and the election cannot be revoked without the consent of the IRS unless the shares or ADSs cease to be marketable.
In addition, if a U.S. Holder owns (or owned) shares or ADSs while we are (or were) a PFIC and the U.S. Holder makes an election to treat us as a qualified electing fund under Section 1295 of the Code (a “QEF Election”), the U.S. Holder generally will not be subject to the adverse rules discussed above. Instead, the U.S. Holder will be subject to current U.S. federal income tax on his, her or its pro rata share of our ordinary earnings and net capital gain, regardless of whether such amounts are actually distributed to the U.S. Holder by us. However, a U.S. Holder can make a QEF Election only if we agree to furnish the U.S. Holder annually with certain tax information, and we currently do not intend to prepare or provide such information.
If we are a PFIC in any year with respect to a U.S. Holder, the U.S. Holder will be required to file an annual return on IRS Form 8621 regarding distributions received on shares or ADSs and any gain realized on the disposition of shares or ADSs.
123
In addition, under recently enacted U.S. legislation effective as of March 18, 2010 and subject to future guidance, if we are a PFIC, U.S. Holders will be required to file an annual information return with the IRS relating to their ownership of our shares or ADSs. Pursuant to recent IRS guidance, this reporting requirement has been suspended until the IRS releases a revised version of IRS Form 8621. Additional guidance is expected regarding the specific information that will be required to be reported on the revised IRS Form 8621. Prior to filing their annual income tax returns, U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding whether additional guidance has been issued with respect to this reporting requirement, and if so, how to comply with such guidance.
One or more of our subsidiaries may also be classified as PFICs now or in the future, and furthermore, we or one or more of our subsidiaries may invest in the equity of other foreign corporations that are PFICs. Generally, in a year in which we are a PFIC, U.S. Holders will also be subject to the PFIC rules with respect to their indirect ownership interests in such PFICs. U.S. Holders may not be able to make either a QEF Election or a Mark-to-Market Election with respect to any of our subsidiaries that are PFICs, and there can be no assurance that U.S. Holders will be able to make such elections with respect to any other PFICs in which we or one or more of our subsidiaries invests.
Since the PFIC rules are complex, U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding the potential application of the PFIC regime, including eligibility for and the manner and advisability of making a mark-to-market election.
Information reporting and backup withholding
The proceeds of a sale or other disposition, as well as dividends paid with respect to shares or ADSs by a United States payor (including any payments received from a U.S. financial intermediary), generally will be reported to the IRS and to the U.S. Holder as required under applicable regulations. Backup withholding tax may apply to these payments if the U.S. Holder fails to timely provide an accurate taxpayer identification number or otherwise fails to comply with, or establish an exemption from, such backup withholding tax requirements. Certain U.S. Holders (including, among others, corporations) are not subject to the information reporting or backup withholding tax requirements described herein. U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors as to their qualification for exemption from backup withholding tax and the procedure for establishing an exemption.
In addition, under recently enacted U.S. legislation effective for taxable years beginning after March 18, 2010, and subject to specified exceptions and future guidance, a U.S. Holder that is an individual or, to the extent provided in future guidance, a U.S. entity, will be required to report to the IRS such U.S. Holder’s interests in stock or securities issued by a non-U.S. person. Pursuant to recent IRS guidance, this reporting requirement has been suspended until the IRS releases IRS Form 8938. Additional guidance is expected regarding the specific information that will be required to be reported on IRS Form 8938. Prior to filing their annual income tax returns, U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding whether additional guidance has been issued with respect to this reporting requirement, and if so, how to comply with such guidance.
U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding the information reporting obligations that may arise from their acquisition, ownership or disposition of our shares or ADSs.
Enforcement of Civil Liabilities
| | | We are incorporated in the Cayman Islands due to the following benefits found there: |
| • | | political and economic stability; |
| • | | an effective judicial system; |
124
| • | | a favorable tax system; |
| • | | the absence of exchange control or currency restrictions; and |
| • | | the availability of professional and support services. |
However, certain disadvantages accompany incorporation in the Cayman Islands. These disadvantages include:
| (1) | | the Cayman Islands has a less developed body of securities laws as compared to the United States and provides significantly less protection to investors; and |
| (2) | | Cayman Islands companies may not have standing to sue before the federal courts of the United States. |
Our constituent documents do not contain provisions requiring that disputes, including those arising under the securities laws of the United States, between us, our officers, directors and shareholders be arbitrated.
A substantial portion of our current operations is conducted in China and other countries through our wholly owned subsidiaries which are incorporated in China, Hong Kong, the British Virgin Islands and United Arab Emirates. All or most of our assets are located in China and other countries. A majority of our directors and officers are nationals or residents of jurisdictions other than the United States and a substantial portion of their assets are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for a shareholder to effect service of process within the United States upon these persons, or to enforce against us or them judgments obtained in United States courts, including judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state in the United States.
Walkers, our counsel as to Cayman Islands law, have advised that there is no statutory mechanism by which a judgment obtained in the United States courts can be recognized or enforced in the Cayman Islands. At common law, a foreign judgment which is in personam (a judgment against a person or other legal entity such as a company) may be recognized if:
| (1) | | the judgment debtor was, at the time the foreign proceedings were instituted, present in the foreign country (which could be presence through an agent or representative office); |
| (2) | | the judgment debtor was plaintiff, or counter-claimed, in the proceedings in the foreign country; |
| (3) | | the judgment debtor, being a defendant in the foreign court, voluntarily submitted to the jurisdiction of that court by participating in the foreign proceedings; or |
| (4) | | if the judgment debtor had, before the commencement of the foreign proceedings agreed, in respect of the subject matter of the proceedings, to submit to the jurisdiction of that court or the courts of that country. |
The Cayman Islands court must also be satisfied that the judgment was not obtained by fraud and the proceedings in which the judgment was obtained were not contrary to natural justice and the judgment is final and conclusive on the merits. The usual procedure for enforcement of a foreign judgment is to commence proceedings on the judgment.
125
Our counsel as to Cayman Islands law has further advised us that the courts of the Cayman Islands would not entertain original actions brought in the Cayman Islands against us or our directors or officers which only relate to the securities laws of the United States or any state in the United States. An original action brought in the Cayman Islands must give rise to a cause of action in the Cayman Islands (whether pursuant to Cayman Islands statutes or the common law).
Jun He Law Offices, our counsel as to Chinese law, have advised us that there is uncertainty as to whether the courts of China would:
| (1) | | recognize or enforce judgments of United States courts obtained against us or our directors or officers predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state in the United States; or |
| (2) | | entertain original actions brought in China against us or our directors or officers predicated upon the securities laws of the United States or any state in the United States. |
Our counsel as to Chinese law has advised us further that the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments are provided for under Chinese Civil Procedures Law. Chinese courts may recognize and enforce foreign judgments in accordance with the requirements of Chinese Civil Procedures Law based either on treaties between China and the country or region where the judgment is made or on reciprocity between jurisdictions. In addition, according to the PRC Civil Procedures Law, courts in the PRC will not enforce a foreign judgment if they decide that the judgment violates the basic principles of PRC laws or national sovereignty, security or public interest.
F. Dividends and Paying Agents
Not applicable.
G. Statement by Experts
Not applicable.
H. Documents on Display
We have previously filed with the SEC our registration statement on Form F-1 and prospectus under the Securities Act with respect to our ADSs.
We are subject to the periodic reporting and other informational requirements of the Exchange Act. Under the Exchange Act, we are required to file reports and other information with the SEC. Specifically, we are required to file annually a Form 20-F: (1) within six months after the end of each fiscal year, which is December 31, for fiscal years ending before December 15, 2011, and (2) within four months after the end of each fiscal year for fiscal years ending on or after December 15, 2011. Copies of reports and other information, when so filed, may be inspected without charge and may be obtained at prescribed rates at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. You can request copies of these documents upon payment of a duplicating fee, by writing to the SEC. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the operation of the public reference rooms. The SEC also maintains a website atwww.sec.govthat contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding registrants that make electronic filings with the SEC using its EDGAR system. As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from the rules under the Exchange Act prescribing the furnishing and content of quarterly reports and proxy statements, and officers, directors and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting and short-swing profit recovery provisions contained in Section 16 of the Exchange Act.
126
Our financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
In accordance with Rule 5250(d) of the NASDAQ Listing Rules, we will post this annual report on our website at http://www.linktone.com/sec_filings.jsp. In addition, we will provide hardcopies of our annual report free of charge to shareholders and ADS holders upon request.
I. Subsidiary Information
Not applicable.
| | |
Item 11. | | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
Interest Rate Risk
Our exposure to risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our investments in short-term financial instruments. Investments in both fixed rate and floating rate interest earning instruments carry some interest rate risk. The fair value of fixed rate securities may fall due to a rise in interest rates, while floating rate securities may produce less income than expected if interest rates fall. Partly as a result of this, our future interest income may fall short of expectations due to changes in interest rates, or we may suffer losses in principal if we are forced to sell securities that have fallen in estimated fair value due to changes in interest rates. However, as substantially all of our cash equivalents consist of bank deposits and short-term money market instruments, we do not expect any material change with respect to our net income as a result of an interest rate change.
Foreign Currency Risk
Our subsidiaries conduct most of their business transactions in their own measurement currencies, and we believe that, in general, our exposure to foreign exchange risks from operations is limited. However, we hold some assets or liabilities in foreign currencies other than measurement currency and the value of these assets and liabilities are subject to foreign currency risks resulting from fluctuations in exchange rates between the foreign-denominated currency and the measurement currency. We have not used hedging transactions to reduce our exposure to exchange rate fluctuations, and we may in the future experience economic loss as a result of any foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. For more information on foreign currency translations of our financial reporting purpose, see note 2 to our consolidated financial statements beginning on page F-1 in this annual report.
It is possible that the Chinese government may elect to loosen further its current controls over the extent to which the Renminbi is allowed to fluctuate in value in relation to foreign currencies. Our business and the price of our ordinary shares and ADSs could be negatively affected by a revaluation of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollar or by other fluctuations in prevailing Renminbi-U.S. dollar exchange rates. For example, to the extent that we need to convert U.S. dollars into Renminbi for our operational needs and should the Renminbi appreciate against the U.S. dollar at that time, our cash flows would be reduced which could materially adversely affect our business. Conversely, if we decide to convert our Renminbi into U.S. dollars for the purpose of declaring dividends on our ordinary shares or for other business purposes and the U.S. dollar appreciates against the Renminbi, the U.S. dollar equivalent of our earnings from our subsidiaries in China would be reduced. We continue to maintain a portion of our cash in Indonesian rupiah in 2010 to take advantage of short term fluctuations in exchange rates between U.S. dollars and Indonesian rupiah and favorable interest rates for short term deposits in Indonesian rupiah. Our financial performance may be negatively affected by a revaluation of the Indonesian rupiah against the U.S. dollar.
127
During the year ended December 31, 2010, the foreign currency translation adjustments to our comprehensive income were $2.3 million and the currency gain was $2.3 million, primarily as a result of the Chinese Renminbi, Singapore dollar or Indonesian rupiah appreciating against the U.S. dollar. The following is a sensitivity analysis showing the impact of hypothetical changes in the value of the Chinese Renminbi, Singapore Dollar and Indonesian rupiah against the U.S. dollar as of December 31, 2010 on our results for 2010:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Change in the Value of | | | | | Additional | |
Foreign Currency against the | | Additional Translation Adjustments to Comprehensive | | | Transaction | |
U.S. Dollar from Actual | | Income | | | Gain/(Loss) | |
Value as of December 31, 2010 | | ($) | | | ($) | |
| | Chinese | | | Singapore | | | Indonesian | | | | | | | | |
| | Renminbi | | | Dollar | | | Rupiah | | | Total | | | | |
2.5% Appreciation | | | (2,784,144 | ) | | | (405,156 | ) | | | (185,866 | ) | | | (3,375,166 | ) | | | 14,469 | |
5% Appreciation | | | (5,568,288 | ) | | | (810,312 | ) | | | (371,731 | ) | | | (6,750,331 | ) | | | 28,938 | |
2.5% Depreciation | | | 2,784,144 | | | | 405,156 | | | | 185,866 | | | | 3,375,166 | | | | (14,496 | ) |
5% Depreciation | | | 5,568,288 | | | | 810,312 | | | | 371,731 | | | | 6,750,331 | | | | (28,938 | ) |
| | |
Item 12. | | Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities |
A. Debt Securities
Not applicable.
B. Warrants and Rights
Not applicable.
C. Other Securities
Not applicable.
D. American Depositary Shares
Fees and charges our ADS holders may have to pay
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is our depositary. The depositary collects its fees for delivery and surrender of ADSs directly from investors depositing ordinary shares or surrendering ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal or from intermediaries acting for them. The depositary collects fees for making distributions to investors by deducting those fees from the amounts distributed or by selling a portion of distributable property to pay the fees. The depositary may collect its annual fee for depositary services by deducting from cash distributions or by directly billing investors or by charging the book-entry system accounts of participants acting for them. The depositary may generally refuse to provide services for which fees are chargeable until such fees are paid.
128
| | |
|
ADS holders may have to pay: | | For: |
| | |
US$5 per 100 ADS | | • Issuance of ADSs, including issuances resulting from a distribution of ordinary shares or rights or other property |
| | |
| | • Cancellation or withdrawals of ADSs |
| | |
| | • Distribution of ADSs pursuant to stock dividends or stock split |
| | |
| | • Distributions of securities other than ADSs or rights to purchase additional ADSs |
| | |
Up to US$0.02 per ADS | | • Distributions of cash dividends or other cash distributions |
| | |
| | • Annual depositary services |
| | |
US$1.5 per certificate presented for transfer | | • Transfer of American depositary receipts, or ADRs |
| | |
Taxes and other governmental charges the depositary or the custodian have to pay on any ADS or ordinary shares underlying an ADS, for example, stock transfer taxes, stamp duty or withholding taxes | | • As necessary |
| | |
Any charges, fees or expenses incurred by the depositary or its agents for servicing the deposited securities | | • As necessary |
Fees and other payments made by the depositary to us
The depositary has agreed to reimburse us for certain reasonable expenses related to our ADS program, including expenses for investor relations servicing, investor related presentations, ADS-related advertising and public relations, legal fees and accountants’ fee. For the year ended December 31, 2010, we were entitled to receive up to $160,000 from the depositary as reimbursement for such expenses.
The depositary paid us $71,103 as reimbursement for proxy expenses and waived a fee of $295,000 for program maintenance with respect to the year ended December 31, 2010.
PART II
| | |
Item 13. | | Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies |
Not Applicable.
| | |
Item 14. | | Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds |
None.
129
| | |
Item 15. | | Controls and Procedures |
Evaluation of Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of the end of the fiscal year covered by this annual report. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of December 31, 2010, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted by us under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely discussions regarding required disclosure.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on criteria established in the Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this evaluation, our management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2010.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures may deteriorate.
In accordance with applicable laws, this annual report does not include an attestation report of the company’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting because our company did not qualify as an “accelerated filer,” as such term is defined in the rules promulgated under the Exchange Act, with respect to the year ended December 31, 2010.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15 or 15d-15 of the Exchange Act that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
| | |
Item 16A. | | Audit Committee Financial Expert |
Our board of directors has determined that during their term of service on our board, Mr. Thomas Hubbs (who was the sole member of our audit committee in 2010 and resigned from our board in February 2011) and Mr. Billy Hsieh (who became the sole member of our audit committee in February 2011), each qualify as an Audit Committee Financial Expert as defined by the applicable rules of the SEC and that they are “independent” as that term is defined in Rule 5605(a)(2) of the NASDAQ Listing Rules.
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct which applies to our employees, officers and non-employee directors, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, and persons performing similar functions. This code is intended to qualify as a “code of ethics” within the meaning of the applicable rules of the SEC, and has been included as Exhibit 11.1 to our annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005.
130
The Code of Business Conduct is available on our website at www.linktone.com/governance.jsp. To the extent required by law, any amendments to, or waivers from, any provision of the Code of Business Conduct will be promptly disclosed to the public. Copies of the Code of Business Conduct will be provided to any shareholder upon written request to the Vice President of Legal Affairs of Linktone Ltd., 27/F, Building 1, Landmark Towers, 8 North East Third Ring Road, Chao Yang District, Beijing 100004, People’s Republic of China.
| | |
Item 16C. | | Principal Accountant Fees and Services |
Disclosure of Fees Charged by Independent Accountants
The following table summarizes the fees charged by Grant Thornton (our independent accountants from September 2008 until September 2009) and Ernst & Young Hua Ming, or E&Y (our independent accountants from September 2009 until the present time), for certain services rendered to our company during 2009 and 2010:
| | | | | | | | |
| | For the year ended December 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2010 | |
| | $ | | | $ | |
Audit fees (1) | | | 642,852 | | | | 823,556 | |
Audit-related fees (2) | | | — | | | | — | |
Tax-related fees (3) | | | — | | | | 59,089 | |
Other fees (4) | | | 99,000 | | | | — | |
| | |
(1) | | “Audit fees” means the aggregate fees charged in each of the fiscal years listed for our calendar year audits and reviews of financial statements. In 2009, the audit fees billed by E&Y and Grant Thornton amounted to $187,527 and $455,325, respectively. In 2010, the audit fees billed by E&Y and Grant Thornton amounted to $769,786 and $25,770, respectively. |
|
(2) | | “Audit-related fees” means the aggregate fees charged in each of the fiscal years listed for professional services related to the audit of our financial statements that are not reported under “Audit fees” and consultation on accounting standards or transactions. |
|
(3) | | “Tax-related fees” means the aggregate fees charged by E&Y in 2010 for professional services rendered for tax compliance and tax advisor. |
|
(4) | | “Other fees” in 2009 means fees for advisory services charged by SGV & Co, a member firm of E&Y, in the Republic of the Philippines. |
Audit Committee Pre-approval Policies and Procedures
Our audit committee has adopted procedures which set forth the manner in which the committee will review and approve all audit and non-audit services to be provided by our independent accountants before that firm is retained for such services. The pre-approval procedures are as follows:
| • | | Any audit or non-audit service to be provided to us by the independent accountant must be submitted to our audit committee for review and approval, with a description of the services to be performed and the fees to be charged. |
| • | | Our audit committee in its sole discretion then approves or disapproves the proposed services and documents such approval, if given, through written resolutions or in the minutes of meetings, as the case may be. |
131
| | |
Item 16D. | | Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees |
We relied on an exemption from the independence standards contained in Rule 10A-3(b)(1)(iv) of the Exchange Act for the designation of Muliawan Guptha as an observer of our audit committee, and we determined that such reliance would not materially adversely affect the ability of our audit committee to act independently and to satisfy the other requirements of Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act. Mr. Guptha resigned from the board of directors and therefore as an observer of our audit committee effective July 1, 2010.
| | |
Item 16E. | | Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers |
None.
| | |
Item 16F. | | Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant |
See Item 16F in our annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009.
| | |
Item 16G. | | Corporate Governance |
We are an exempted company incorporated in the Cayman Islands and our ADSs have been listed on the NASDAQ Global Market since March 4, 2004. The significant differences between our corporate governance practices and those followed by U.S. domestic companies are as follows.
Rule 5605 of the NASDAQ Listing Rules requires that a majority of the board of directors be independent directors as defined in Rule 5605(a)(2). As of December 31, 2010, our board of directors consisted of four directors, one of which (Thomas Hubbs) was determined by our board to be “independent” under Rule 5605(a)(2). This is because we are exempted from the NASDAQ requirement as a “Controlled Company” as defined in Rule 5615 due to the fact that more than 50% of our voting power is held by MNC.
Rule 5605 of the NASDAQ Listing Rules requires that the audit committee of an issuer is comprised of at least three members and that all members of the audit committee and the nominating and compensation committee are independent directors. As of December 31, 2010, we had an audit committee with one member (Thomas Hubbs), and a nominating and compensation committee of two members. Our board has determined that Mr. Hubbs is “independent” as the term is defined in Rule 5605(a)(2) of the NASDAQ Listing Rules. Our current nominating and compensation committee member is not an independent director. This home country practice of ours differs from the requirements of the NASDAQ Listing Rules in these areas because there are no specific requirements under Cayman Islands law on the composition of audit committee, nominating committee and compensation committee.
PART III
| | |
Item 17. | | Financial Statements |
The Company has elected to provide financial statements pursuant to Item 18.
132
| | |
Item 18. | | Financial Statements |
The consolidated financial statements for Linktone Ltd. and its subsidiaries are included at the end of this annual report.
| | | | |
|
| 1.1 | | | Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association of the Company with an amendment dated April 3, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to Amendment No. 1 to the company’s Annual Report on Form 20F for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the SEC on July 17, 2008). |
| | | | |
| 1.2 | | | Amendment dated November 4, 2009 to the Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.2 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed with the SEC on June 29, 2010). |
| | | | |
| 2.1 | | | Specimen American Depositary Receipt of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form F-6 (Registration No. 333-112897) as filed with the SEC on February 17, 2004). |
| | | | |
| 2.2 | | | Specimen Share Certificate of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form F-1 (Registration No. 333-112903) as filed with the SEC on February 17, 2004). |
| | | | |
| 2.3 | | | Amended and Restated Deposit Agreement dated April 26, 2007 among the Company, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and owners and beneficial owners of the American Depositary Receipts issued thereunder (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form F-6 (Registration No. 333-142133) as filed with the SEC on April 16, 2007). |
| | | | |
| 4.1 | | | Form of 2000-1 Employee Stock Option Scheme (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form F-1 (Registration No. 333-112903) as filed with the SEC on February 17, 2004). |
| | | | |
| 4.2 | | | Form of 2003 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form F-1 (Registration No. 333-112903) as filed with the SEC on February 17, 2004). |
| | | | |
| 4.3 | | | Form of Employment Agreement with the Company’s executive officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed with the SEC on June 29, 2010). |
| | | | |
| 4.4 | | | Form of Indemnification Agreement with the Company’s directors and officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form F-1 (Registration No. 333-112903) as filed with the SEC on February 17, 2004). |
133
| | | | |
|
| 4.5 | | | Translation of Domain Name License Agreement dated as of November 27, 2003 between the Company and Shanghai Weilan Computer Co., Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form F-1 (Registration No. 333-112903) as filed with the SEC on February 17, 2004). |
| | | | |
| 4.6 | | | Translation of Domain Name License Agreement dated as of November 27, 2003 between the Company and Shanghai Weilan Computer Co., Ltd, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form F-1 (Registration No. 333-112903) as filed with the SEC on February 17, 2004). |
| | | | |
| 4.7 | | | Translation of Domain Name License Agreement dated as of November 27, 2003 between Shanghai Linktone Consulting Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Unilink Computer Co., Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form F-1 (Registration No. 333-112903) as filed with the SEC on February 17, 2004). |
| | | | |
| 4.8 | | | Translation of Domain Name Assignment Agreement dated as of November 27, 2003 between Shanghai Weilan Computer Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Linktone Consulting Co., Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form F-1 (Registration No. 333-112903) as filed with the SEC on February 17, 2004). |
| | | | |
| 4.9 | | | Translation of Domain Name License Agreement dated as of November 27, 2003 between Shanghai Linktone Consulting Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Weilan Computer Co., Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form F-1 (Registration No. 333-112903) as filed with the SEC on February 17, 2004). |
| | | | |
| 4.10 | | | Translation of Trademark License Agreement dated as of November 27, 2003 between the Company and Shanghai Weilan Computer Co., Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form F-1 (Registration No. 333-112903) as filed with the SEC on February 17, 2004). |
| | | | |
| 4.11 | | | Translation of Trademark License Agreement dated as of November 27, 2003 between the Company and Shanghai Unilink Computer Co., Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form F-1 (Registration No. 333-112903) as filed with the SEC on February 17, 2004). |
| | | | |
| 4.12 | | | Translation of Equity Interests Pledge Agreement dated May 12, 2006 between Shanghai Linktone Consulting Co., Ltd. and Yao Baoxin (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.48 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 filed with the SEC on July 13, 2007). |
| | | | |
| 4.13 | | | Translation of Equity Interests Pledge Agreement dated October 16, 2006 between Shanghai Linktone Consulting Co., Ltd. and Wang Wenlei (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.49 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 filed with the SEC on July 13, 2007). |
| | | | |
| 4.14 | | | Translation of Contract Relating to the Exclusive Purchase Right of Equity Interest dated May 12, 2006 among Shanghai Weilan Computer Co., Ltd., Linktone Ltd. and Yao Baoxin (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.50 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 filed with the SEC on July 13, 2007). |
134
| | | | |
|
| 4.15 | | | Translation of Contract Relating to the Exclusive Purchase Right of Equity Interest dated October 16, 2006 among Shanghai Weilan Computer Co., Ltd., Linktone Ltd. and Wang Wenlei (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.51 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 filed with the SEC on July 13, 2007). |
| | | | |
| 4.16 | | | Translation of Loan Agreement dated May 12, 2006 between Linktone Ltd. and Yao Baoxin (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.52 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 filed with the SEC on July 13, 2007). |
| | | | |
| 4.17 | | | Translation of Loan Agreement dated October 16, 2006 between Linktone Ltd. and Wang Wenlei (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.53 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 filed with the SEC on July 13, 2007). |
| | | | |
| 4.18 | | | Translation of Operating Agreement dated October 16, 2006 among Shanghai Linktone Consulting Co., Ltd., Shanghai Weilan Computer Co., Ltd., Wang Wenlei and Yao Baoxin (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.54 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 filed with the SEC on July 13, 2007). |
| | | | |
| 4.19 | | | Translation of Power of Attorney made by Yao Baoxin on May 12, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.55 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 filed with the SEC on July 13, 2007). |
| | | | |
| 4.20 | | | Translation of Power of Attorney made by Wang Wenlei on October 16, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.56 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 filed with the SEC on July 13, 2007). |
| | | | |
| 4.21 | | | Translation of Agreement on Aftermath of the Cooperation dated February 4, 2009 between Tianjin TV Satellite Channel and Shanghai Lang Yi Advertising Co., Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.23 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed with the SEC on June 19, 2009). |
| | | | |
| 4.22 | | | Translation of Agreement on Termination of Qinghai Satellite TV Project dated July 30, 2008 among CCYL Central Network Film and TV Center, Beijing Lianfei Wireless Communication Technology Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Lingyu Culture and Communication Co., Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.26 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed with the SEC on June 19, 2009). |
| | | | |
| 4.23 | | | Translation of Cooperative Agreement on Voice Magazine Service for the period from November 1, 2008 to October 31, 2009 between China Mobile Group Beijing Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Weilan Computer Co., Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.28 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed with the SEC on June 19, 2009). |
| | | | |
| 4.24 | | | Loan agreement dated October 10, 2008 between Linktone Ltd. and GLD Investments Pte. Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.36 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed with the SEC on June 19, 2009). |
135
| | | | |
|
| 4.25 | | | Translation of Exclusive Consulting and Services Agreement dated January 1, 2009 between Shanghai Linktone Consulting Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Weilan Computer Co., Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.24 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed with the SEC on June 29, 2010). |
| | | | |
| 4.26 | | | Translation of Software License Agreement dated January 1, 2009 between Shanghai Huitong Information Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Weilan Computer Co., Ltd. (PETS Cellphone Games Software) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.25 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed with the SEC on June 29, 2010). |
| | | | |
| 4.27 | | | Translation of Software License Agreement dated January 1, 2009 between Shanghai Huitong Information Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Qimingxing E-commerce Co., Ltd. (PETS Cellphone Games Software) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.26 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed with the SEC on June 29, 2010). |
| | | | |
| 4.28 | | | Translation of Software License Agreement dated January 1, 2009 between Shanghai Linktone Internet Technology Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Weilan Computer Co., Ltd. (IVR Background Operating Software System V1.0) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.27 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed with the SEC on June 29, 2010). |
| | | | |
| 4.29 | | | Translation of Software License Agreement dated January 1, 2009 between Shanghai Huitong Information Co., Ltd. and Beijing Lianfei Wireless Communications Technology Company Limited (Linktone Photos and Tones Cellphone Software V1.0) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.28 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed with the SEC on June 29, 2010). |
| | | | |
| 4.30 | | | Equity Interest Purchase and Capital Increase Agreement dated January 6, 2010 among Shanghai Weilan Computer Co., Ltd., Hefei Baofeng Cartoon Information Technology Co., Ltd. and Hefei Letang Cartoon Information Technology Co., Ltd. |
| | | | |
| 4.31 | | | Equityholders Agreement dated January 6, 2010 among Shanghai Weilan Computer Co., Ltd., Hefei Baofeng Cartoon Information Technology Co., Ltd. and Hefei Letang Cartoon Information Technology Co., Ltd. |
| | | | |
| 4.32 | | | Appointment Letter dated May 1, 2010 between InnoForm Media Pte Ltd and Peck Joo Tan. |
| | | | |
| 8.1 | | | List of Principal Subsidiaries and Affiliated Variable Interest Entities of the Company. |
| | | | |
| 11.1 | | | Code of Business Conduct (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 11.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 filed with the SEC on June 30, 2005). |
| | | | |
| 12.1 | | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Required by Rule 13a-14(a). |
| | | | |
| 12.2 | | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Required by Rule 13a-14(a). |
136
| | | | |
|
| 13.1 | | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Required by Rule 13a-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. |
| | | | |
| 13.2 | | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Required by Rule 13a-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. |
| | | | |
| 15.1 | | | Consent of Ernst & Young Hua Ming, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. |
| | | | |
| 15.2 | | | Consent of JBPB & Co. (formerly known as Grant Thornton), Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. |
| | | | |
| 15.3 | | | Consent of Walkers |
| | | | |
| 15.4 | | | Consent of Jun He Law Offices |
137
SIGNATURES
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.
| | | | |
| LINKTONE LTD. | |
| By: | /s/ Hary Tanoesoedibjo | |
| | Hary Tanoesoedibjo | |
| | Chief Executive Officer | |
|
| Date: June 30, 2011 | |
138
LINKTONE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
| | | | |
| | Page | |
| | | | |
| | | F-2 | |
| | | | |
| | | F-3 | |
| | | | |
| | | F-4 | |
| | | | |
| | | F-5 | |
| | | | |
| | | F-6 | |
| | | | |
| | | F-7 | |
| | | | |
| | | F-8 | |
| | | | |
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
Linktone Ltd.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Linktone Ltd. (the “Company”) and its subsidiaries (together, the “Group”) as of December 31, 2009 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income/(loss), changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Linktone Ltd. and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2009 and 2010 and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ Ernst & Young Hua Ming
Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
June 30, 2011
F-2
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Linktone Ltd.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows of Linktone Ltd. (a Cayman Islands corporation) and its subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2008. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the results of the operations and the cash flows of Linktone Ltd. and its subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2008 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ JBPB & Co (formerly known as Grant Thornton)
Hong Kong, SAR
June 19, 2009
F-3
LINKTONE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In U.S. dollars, except number of shares)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | As of December 31, | |
| | Note | | | 2009 | | | 2010 | |
| | | | | $ | | | $ | |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | 7 | | | | 79,477,153 | | | | 58,875,399 | |
Restricted cash | | | 8 | | | | — | | | | 573,784 | |
Short-term investments | | | 9 | | | | 19,702,747 | | | | 33,809,913 | |
Accounts receivable, net | | | 11 | | | | 11,838,597 | | | | 15,491,479 | |
Tax refund receivable | | | | | | | 1,953,740 | | | | 2,767,084 | |
Inventories | | | 12 | | | | — | | | | 2,304,716 | |
Due from related parties | | | 26 | | | | 10,812,178 | | | | 2,398,114 | |
Deferred tax assets | | | 24 | | | | 1,176,933 | | | | 1,254,529 | |
Deposits and other current assets | | | 13 | | | | 2,357,624 | | | | 6,584,246 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total current assets | | | | | | | 127,318,972 | | | | 124,059,264 | |
Property and equipment, net | | | 14 | | | | 530,769 | | | | 11,796,390 | |
Non-current assets held for sale | | | 14 | | | | — | | | | 819,578 | |
Intangible assets, net | | | 15 | | | | 106,039 | | | | 11,546,227 | |
Goodwill | | | 6, 16 | | | | 12,084,212 | | | | 40,483,355 | |
Deferred tax assets | | | 24 | | | | 23,264 | | | | 72,480 | |
Other long-term assets | | | 17 | | | | 364,276 | | | | 2,499,426 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | | | | | | 140,427,532 | | | | 191,276,720 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Account payable, accrued liabilities and other payables | | | 18 | | | | 7,915,352 | | | | 22,971,156 | |
Due to related parties | | | 26 | | | | — | | | | 1,074,250 | |
Short-term loan | | | | | | | — | | | | 4,191,591 | |
Taxes payable | | | | | | | 3,013,374 | | | | 3,696,039 | |
Deferred revenue | | | | | | | 351,049 | | | | 402,139 | |
Deferred tax liabilities | | | 24 | | | | 256,736 | | | | 1,078,403 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total current liabilities | | | | | | | 11,536,511 | | | | 33,413,578 | |
Deferred tax liabilities | | | 24 | | | | — | | | | 1,743,466 | |
Other long-term liabilities | | | 19 | | | | — | | | | 2,412,068 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | | | | | 11,536,511 | | | | 37,569,112 | |
Commitments and contingencies | | | 27 | | | | | | | | | |
Shareholders’ equity | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Linktone Ltd. shareholders’equity | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ordinary shares ($0.0001 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized, 420,756,430 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2009 and 421,130,130 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2010) | | | | | | | 42,075 | | | | 42,113 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | | | | | 137,838,890 | | | | 137,581,956 | |
Statutory reserves | | | 23 | | | | 2,466,165 | | | | 2,466,165 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive income: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unrealized gain on investment in marketable securities | | | | | | | 437,250 | | | | 2,376,723 | |
Cumulative translation adjustments | | | | | | | 7,217,287 | | | | 9,306,938 | |
Accumulated losses | | | | | | | (19,110,646 | ) | | | (19,689,371 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total Linktone Ltd. shareholders’ equity | | | | | | | 128,891,021 | | | | 132,084,524 | |
Non-controlling interest | | | | | | | — | | | | 21,623,084 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total shareholders’ equity | | | | | | | 128,891,021 | | | | 153,707,608 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | | | | | | | 140,427,532 | | | | 191,276,720 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-4
LINKTONE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS)
(In U.S. dollars, except number of shares)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | For the year ended December 31, | |
| | Note | | | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2010 | |
| | | | | $ | | | $ | | | $ | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross revenue from non-related parties | | | | | | | 67,025,802 | | | | 61,516,694 | | | | 69,878,417 | |
Gross revenue from related parties | | | 26 | | | | — | | | | 700,000 | | | | 1,829,608 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross revenue | | | 20 | | | | 67,025,802 | | | | 62,216,694 | | | | 71,708,025 | |
Sales tax | | | | | | | (2,520,119 | ) | | | (2,303,289 | ) | | | (2,087,121 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net revenue | | | | | | | 64,505,683 | | | | 59,913,405 | | | | 69,620,904 | |
Cost of revenue | | | | | | | (33,837,630 | ) | | | (38,941,272 | ) | | | (47,137,394 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross profit | | | | | | | 30,668,053 | | | | 20,972,133 | | | | 22,483,510 | |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Product development | | | | | | | (3,177,071 | ) | | | (3,316,507 | ) | | | (2,811,783 | ) |
Selling and marketing | | | | | | | (13,130,513 | ) | | | (9,318,469 | ) | | | (8,377,743 | ) |
General and administrative | | | | | | | (9,901,474 | ) | | | (8,220,999 | ) | | | (12,325,334 | ) |
Provision for impairment | | | | | | | — | | | | (2,068,127 | ) | | | (1,102,265 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total operating expenses | | | | | | | (26,209,058 | ) | | | (22,924,102 | ) | | | (24,617,125 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income/(loss) | | | | | | | 4,458,995 | | | | (1,951,969 | ) | | | (2,133,615 | ) |
Interest income, net of financial expenses from non-related parties | | | | | | | 1,663,881 | | | | 1,289,495 | | | | 2,192,999 | |
Interest income, net of financial expenses from related parties | | | | | | | 64,773 | | | | 325,080 | | | | 85,594 | |
Other income, net of other expenses | | | | | | | 384,553 | | | | 431,005 | | | | 701,884 | |
Other-than-temporary impairment loss on investments | | | 9 | | | | (1,476,937 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from continuing operations before income tax | | | | | | | 5,095,265 | | | | 93,611 | | | | 846,862 | |
Income tax expense | | | 24 | | | | (786,057 | ) | | | (579,270 | ) | | | (1,439,261 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income/(loss) from continuing operations | | | | | | | 4,309,208 | | | | (485,659 | ) | | | (592,399 | ) |
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations | | | 5 | | | | (20,807,008 | ) | | | 596,551 | | | | 315,256 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income/(loss) | | | | | | | (16,497,800 | ) | | | 110,892 | | | | (277,143 | ) |
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest | | | | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (301,582 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income/(loss) attributable to ordinary shareholders of the Company | | | | | | | (16,497,800 | ) | | | 110,892 | | | | (578,725 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic earnings/(loss) per ordinary share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Continuing operations | | | | | | | 0.01 | | | | (0.00 | ) | | | (0.00 | ) |
Discontinued operations | | | | | | | (0.05 | ) | | | 0.00 | | | | 0.00 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income/(loss) | | | | | | | (0.04 | ) | | | 0.00 | | | | (0.00 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted earnings/(loss) per ordinary share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Continuing operations | | | | | | | 0.01 | | | | (0.00 | ) | | | (0.00 | ) |
Discontinued operations | | | | | | | (0.05 | ) | | | 0.00 | | | | 0.00 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income/(loss) | | | | | | | (0.04 | ) | | | 0.00 | | | | (0.00 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted-average number of ordinary shares: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | | | | | 374,285,807 | | | | 420,677,724 | | | | 420,980,146 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted | | | | | | | 374,847,328 | | | | 420,677,724 | | | | 420,980,146 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income /(loss): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income/(loss) | | | | | | | (16,497,800 | ) | | | 110,892 | | | | (277,143 | ) |
Other comprehensive income/(loss): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign currency translation adjustment | | | | | | | 2,646,071 | | | | (145,899 | ) | | | 2,298,216 | |
Unrealized gain on investment in marketable securities | | | | | | | — | | | | 437,250 | | | | 1,939,473 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income/(loss) | | | | | | | (13,851,729 | ) | | | 402,243 | | | | 3,960,546 | |
Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interest | | | | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (510,147 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income/(loss) attributable to ordinary shareholders of the Company | | | | | | | (13,851,729 | ) | | | 402,243 | | | | 3,450,399 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-5
LINKTONE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In U.S. dollars, except share data)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Accumulated | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Additional | | | | | | | other | | | | | | | | | | | Total | |
| | Ordinary shares | | | paid-in | | | Statutory | | | comprehensive | | | Accumulated | | | Non-controlling | | | shareholders’ | |
| | Shares | | | Amount | | | capital | | | reserves | | | income | | | losses | | | interest | | | equity | |
Balance as of December 31, 2007 | | | 240,291,330 | | | $ | 24,029 | | | $ | 72,202,172 | | | $ | 2,360,408 | | | $ | 4,717,115 | | | $ | (2,617,981 | ) | | | — | | | $ | 76,685,743 | |
Issuance of ordinary shares | | | 180,000,000 | | | | 18,000 | | | | 68,382,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 68,400,000 | |
Issuance of ordinary shares from exercise of stock options | | | 344,900 | | | | 34 | | | | 33,938 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 33,972 | |
Cost of issuance of ordinary shares | | | — | | | | — | | | | (3,786,070 | ) | | | — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (3,786,070 | ) |
Stock-based compensation | | | — | | | | — | | | | 728,135 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 728,135 | |
Other comprehensive income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Translation adjustment | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,646,071 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,646,071 | |
Net loss | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (16,497,800 | ) | | | — | | | | (16,497,800 | ) |
Appropriation to statutory reserves | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 105,757 | | | | — | | | | (105,757 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance as of December 31, 2008 | | | 420,636,230 | | | | 42,063 | | | | 137,560,175 | | | | 2,466,165 | | | | 7,363,186 | | | | (19,221,538 | ) | | | — | | | | 128,210,051 | |
Issuance of ordinary shares from exercise of stock options | | | 120,200 | | | | 12 | | | | 11,828 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 11,840 | |
Stock-based compensation | | | — | | | | — | | | | 266,887 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 266,887 | |
Other comprehensive income/(loss): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Translation adjustment | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (145,899 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (145,899 | ) |
Unrealized gain on investment in marketable securities | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 437,250 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 437,250 | |
Net income | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 110,892 | | | | — | | | | 110,892 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance as of December 31, 2009 | | | 420,756,430 | | | | 42,075 | | | | 137,838,890 | | | | 2,466,165 | | | | 7,654,537 | | | | (19,110,646 | ) | | | — | | | | 128,891,021 | |
Issuance of ordinary shares from exercise of stock options | | | 373,700 | | | | 38 | | | | 36,772 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 36,810 | |
Stock-based compensation | | | — | | | | — | | | | 204,949 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 204,949 | |
Acquisition of subsidiaries | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 20,614,282 | | | | 20,614,282 | |
Capital contributed to subsidiaries (Note 6) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (498,655 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 498,655 | | | | — | |
Other comprehensive income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Translation adjustment | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,089,651 | | | | — | | | | 208,565 | | | | 2,298,216 | |
Unrealized gain on investment in marketable securities | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,939,473 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,939,473 | |
Net loss | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (578,725 | ) | | | 301,582 | | | | (277,143 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance as of December 31, 2010 | | | 421,130,130 | | | $ | 42,113 | | | $ | 137,581,956 | | | $ | 2,466,165 | | | $ | 11,683,661 | | | $ | (19,689,371 | ) | | $ | 21,623,084 | | | $ | 153,707,608 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-6
LINKTONE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In U.S. dollars)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the year ended December 31, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2010 | |
| | $ | | | $ | | | $ | |
Cash flow from operating activities | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income/(loss) | | | (16,497,800 | ) | | | 110,892 | | | | (277,143 | ) |
Less: Income/(loss) from discontinued operations | | | (20,807,008 | ) | | | 596,551 | | | | 315,256 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Income/(loss) from continuing operations | | | 4,309,208 | | | | (485,659 | ) | | | (592,399 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income/(loss) from continuing operations to net cash provided by/(used in) continuing operating activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stock-based compensation expense | | | 722,248 | | | | 266,887 | | | | 204,949 | |
Loss/(gain) on disposal of property and equipment | | | (19,302 | ) | | | 41,964 | | | | 12,828 | |
Provision for impairment, net | | | 1,476,937 | | | | 2,068,127 | | | | 1,102,264 | |
Depreciation | | | 946,058 | | | | 556,239 | | | | 721,451 | |
Amortization of intangible assets | | | 624,186 | | | | 65,199 | | | | 1,550,691 | |
Amortization of other long-term assets | | | 86,973 | | | | 112,092 | | | | — | |
Provision for doubtful debts | | | 628,692 | | | | 697,247 | | | | 118,594 | |
Deferred income tax expense/(benefit) | | | (378,403 | ) | | | 564,381 | | | | (365,966 | ) |
Foreign exchange gain | | | (54,815 | ) | | | (222,887 | ) | | | (706,033 | ) |
Realized gain on short-term investments | | | (276,637 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Increase)/decrease in accounts receivable | | | (3,268,035 | ) | | | 1,231,262 | | | | 2,265,145 | |
Increase in tax refund receivable | | | (444,714 | ) | | | (711,191 | ) | | | (727,482 | ) |
(Increase)/decrease in deposits and other assets | | | 1,171,394 | | | | (790,023 | ) | | | 1,598,515 | |
Increase in inventories | | | — | | | | — | | | | (217,868 | ) |
Increase in restricted cash | | | — | | | | — | | | | (573,784 | ) |
Increase in other assets | | | (672,520 | ) | | | — | | | | (742,423 | ) |
Increase/(decrease) in taxes payable | | | 1,117,186 | | | | (1,076,765 | ) | | | 481,766 | |
Increase in long-term liabilities | | | — | | | | — | | | | 735,718 | |
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other payables | | | 2,001,916 | | | | (1,770,189 | ) | | | (3,628,404 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations | | | 7,970,372 | | | | 546,684 | | | | 1,237,562 | |
Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities of discontinued operations | | | (10,799,804 | ) | | | 4,395,367 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities | | | (2,829,432 | ) | | | 4,942,051 | | | | 1,237,562 | |
Cash flow from investing activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of short-term investments | | | — | | | | — | | | | 7,584,758 | |
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment | | | 21,733 | | | | 5,990 | | | | 1,997,317 | |
Loans repayment from related party | | | — | | | | — | | | | 10,087,400 | |
Settlement of loans receivable | | | — | | | | 395,257 | | | | — | |
Loan to associates | | | — | | | | — | | | | (1,250,000 | ) |
Purchase of property and equipment | | | (296,218 | ) | | | (102,920 | ) | | | (1,013,333 | ) |
Loans advanced to related parties | | | — | | | | (1,901,700 | ) | | | — | |
Loan repayment to related parties | | | — | | | | — | | | | (9,214,669 | ) |
Cash paid for short-term investments | | | (12,613,076 | ) | | | (4,877,594 | ) | | | (20,118,750 | ) |
Cash paid for business acquisitions, net of cash acquired (Note 6) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (13,759,012 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by/(used in) investing activities of continuing operations | | | (12,887,561 | ) | | | (6,480,967 | ) | | | (25,686,289 | ) |
Net cash used in investing activities of discontinued operations | | | (16,210 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (12,903,771 | ) | | | (6,480,967 | ) | | | (25,686,289 | ) |
Cash flow from financing activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash received from bank borrowings | | | — | | | | — | | | | 3,188,283 | |
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options | | | 33,972 | | | | 11,840 | | | | 38 | |
Proceeds from issuance of new shares | | | 68,400,000 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Cash paid for cost incurred in connection with issuance of new shares | | | (3,274,540 | ) | | | (450,000 | ) | | | — | |
Cash paid for related-party loans | | | (7,799,893 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities of continuing operations | | | 57,359,539 | | | | (438,160 | ) | | | 3,188,321 | |
Effect of exchange rate change on cash and cash equivalents | | | 641,903 | | | | (139,594 | ) | | | 658,652 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents | | | 42,268,239 | | | | (2,116,670 | ) | | | (20,601,754 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year | | | 39,325,584 | | | | 81,593,823 | | | | 79,477,153 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year | | | 81,593,823 | | | | 79,477,153 | | | | 58,875,399 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Business and other taxes on revenues | | | (5,711,548 | ) | | | (5,648,133 | ) | | | (3,717,443 | ) |
Value-added tax refund | | | 2,989,710 | | | | 2,326,649 | | | | 1,642,170 | |
Income tax paid | | | (516,984 | ) | | | (993,747 | ) | | | (426,256 | ) |
Interest paid | | | — | | | | — | | | | (41,365 | ) |
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash activities | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Conversion of MCB to the interests in PT Linktone (Note 6 (c)) | | | — | | | | — | | | | 13,168,568 | |
Business acquisitions included in the other payables (Note 6) | | | — | | | | — | | | | 8,123,835 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-7
LINKTONE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)
1 Organization and Nature of Operations
Linktone Ltd. (“Linktone,” or the “Company”), a Cayman Islands corporation, through its subsidiaries and consolidated Variable Interest Entities (“VIEs”) (collectively referred to as the “Group”) is a provider of (i) telecom value-added services (“VAS”) in People’s Republic of China (“PRC”)and Indonesia; (ii) online PC game services to consumers and enterprises PRC; and (iii) video and audio distribution and related services in Singapore, Malaysia and Indonesia. As of December 31, 2010, Linktone is 58.1% owned by PT. Media Nusantara Citra Tbk, an Indonesian corporation (“MNC”).
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the results of operations of the Company, the following subsidiaries and the following VIEs, for which the Company is the primary beneficiary:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Name in | | | | | | | | Country of |
Name of Subsidiary | | Short Form | | Note | | Principal Business | | Group Equity Interest | | Incorporation |
Brilliant Concept Investments Ltd | | Brilliant | | | | Intermediary holding company | | 100% by Linktone | | British Virgin Islands |
Noveltech Enterprises Limited | | Noveltech | | | | Intermediary holding company | | 100% by Linktone | | Hong Kong |
Linktone Media Limited | | Linktone Media | | | | Intermediary holding company | | 100% by Linktone | | Hong Kong |
Ojava Overseas Ltd | | Ojava Overseas | | | | Intermediary holding company; Dormant | | 100% by Linktone | | British Virgin Islands |
Linktone International Limited | | Linktone International | | | | Intermediary holding company | | 100% by Linktone | | United Arab Emirates |
Wang You Digital Technology Co., Ltd. | | Wang You | | (1) | | Provides PC games | | 100% by Brilliant Concept Investments Ltd | | PRC |
Shanghai Linktone Consulting Co., Ltd. | | Linktone Consulting | | (1) | | Provides internet and VAS consulting services | | 100% by Noveltech Enterprise Limited | | PRC |
Shanghai Huitong Information Co., Ltd. | | Huitong | | (1) | | Software development | | 100% by Noveltech Enterprise Limited | | PRC |
Shanghai Linktone Internet Technology Co., Ltd. | | Linktone Internet | | | | Software development | | 100% by Noveltech Enterprise Limited | | PRC |
Shanghai Xintong Information Technology Co., Ltd. | | Xintong | | | | Software development; Dormant | | 100% by Noveltech Enterprise Limited | | PRC |
Shanghai Linktone Software Co., Ltd. | | Linktone Software | | | | Software development | | 100% by Linktone | | PRC |
Beijing Ruida Internet Technology Co., Ltd. | | Ruida | | | | Software development; Dormant | | 100% by Ojava Overseas Ltd | | PRC |
InnoForm Media Pte Ltd | | InnoForm Media | | | | Publisher, licensee, importer, exporter and distribution of entertainment programs | | 75% by Linktone International Limited; Acquired in March 2010 | | Singapore |
InnoForm Media (HK) Limited | | InnoForm HK | | | | Publisher, licensee, importer, exporter and distribution of compact discs and DVDs of all kinds | | 100% by InnoForm Media Pte Ltd | | Hong Kong |
InnoForm Media (Taiwan) Co. Limited | | InnoForm Taiwan | | | | Importer, exporter and distribution of compact discs, tapes and records | | 100% by InnoForm Media Pte Ltd | | Taiwan |
InnoForm Media (M) Sdn Bhd | | InnoForm Malaysia | | | | Production and distribution of tapes, DVD and compact discs | | 100% by InnoForm Media Pte Ltd | | Malaysia |
InnoForm Entertainment Pte Ltd | | InnoForm Entertainment | | | | Exclusive collective licensing agent for music label companies for karaoke music and songs | | 100% by InnoForm Media Pte Ltd | | Singapore |
InnoForm Digital Media Pte Ltd | | InnoForm Digitial | | | | Supplying and leasing of karaoke-on-demand hardware and software | | 100% by InnoForm Media Pte Ltd | | Singapore |
| | |
(1) | | Wholly foreign owned entity (“WFOE”) of the Company. |
F-8
LINKTONE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)
1 Organization and Nature of Operations (continued)
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Name in | | | | | | | | Country of |
Name of Subsidiary | | Short Form | | Note | | Principal Business | | Group Equity Interest | | Incorporation |
Alliance Entertainment Singapore Pte Ltd | | Alliance | | | | Motion picture, video distribution and services related to motion picture, video production and distribution | | 100% by InnoForm Media Pte Ltd | | Singapore |
GLD Investments Pte Ltd | | GLD | | | | Provides information technology and publishing services | | 98.7% by InnoForm Media Pte Ltd | | Singapore |
PT Linktone Indonesia | | PT Linktone | | | | Provides telecom VAS | | 51% by Linktone International Acquired in June 2010 | | Indonesia |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Loan to Nominee | | |
Name of Variable Interest Entity | | Name in | | | | | | | | Shareholders | | Country of |
(“VIE”) | | Short Form | | Note | | Principal Business | | Group Equity Interest | | $’000 | | Incorporation |
Shanghai Weilan Computer Co., Ltd. | | Weilan | | (i) | | Provides telecom VAS | | Baoxin Yao and Wenlei Wang | | 338.1 and 285.8, respectively | | PRC |
Shanghai Unilink Computer Co., Ltd. | | Unilink | | (i) | | Provides telecom VAS | | Lin Lin and Wenju Hu | | 604.1 each | | PRC |
Shenzhen Yuan Hang Technology Co., Ltd. | | Yuan Hang | | (i) | | Provides PC games | | Yuming Cai and Feng Gao | | 290.4 each | | PRC |
Beijing Cosmos Digital Technology Co., Ltd. | | Cosmos | | (i) | | Provides telecom VAS | | Hongjie Qi and Miao Yan | | 2,073.8 each | | PRC |
Hainan Zhong Tong Computer Network Co., Ltd. | | Zhong Tong | | (i) | | Provides telecom VAS | | Yi Juang and Teng Zhao | | 826.9 each | | PRC |
Beijing Lian Fei Wireless Communications Technology Co., Ltd. | | Lian Fei | | (i) | | Provides telecom VAS | | Hongyan Lu and Yuxia Wang | | 939.5 and 1,083.3, respectively | | PRC |
Shanghai Qimingxing E-commerce Co., Ltd. | | Qimingxing | | (i) | | Provides telecom VAS | | Xing Xu and Peien Zhu | | 933.9 each | | PRC |
Beijing Ojava Wireless Information Technology Co., Ltd. | | Beijing Ojava | | (i) | | Provides telecom VAS | | Yugang Wang and Peiyu Su | | 501.7 each | | PRC |
Shanghai Ling Yu Cultural and Communication Ltd. | | Ling Yu | | | | Provides advertising services; Dormant | | 50% by Shanghai Unilink Computer Co., Ltd. and 50% by Shanghai Qimingxing E-commerce Co., Ltd. | | Nil each | | PRC |
Zhong Qing Wei Lian Cultural Communication Co., Ltd. | | Wei Lian | | | | Provides telecom VAS; Dormant | | 60% by Shanghai Weilan Computer Co., Ltd. and 40% by Beijing Lian Fei Wireless Communications Technology Co., Ltd. | | Nil each | | PRC |
Beijing Lian Yu Interactive Technology Development Co., Ltd. | | Lian Yu | | (i) | | Provides telecom VAS; Dormant | | Zhi Wang and Xiaoke Zha | | 90.3 and 133.0, respectively | | PRC |
Shanghai Lang Yi Advertising Co., Ltd. | | Lang Yi | | (i) | | Provides advertising services; Dormant | | Fei Tong and Jing Chen | | Nil each | | PRC |
Beijing Xian Feng Li Liang Media Co., Ltd. | | Xian Feng | | (i) | | Distributes electronic publications | | Ai Hua Zhang and Juan Yang | | 346.2 and 332.7, respectively | | PRC |
Letang Game Limited | | Letang | | | | Develops mobile games | | 50.01% by Shanghai Weilan Computer Co., Ltd.; Acquired in January 2010 | | | | PRC |
PT Cakrawala Alam Semesta | | Cakrawala | | | | Investment holding company | | 100% by Indonesian individuals affiliated with Linktone | | Nil each | | Indonesia |
| | |
(i) | | Controlled through contractual agreements and is 50% owned by each of two of the Company’s employees / former employees. |
F-9
LINKTONE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)
1 Organization and Nature of Operations (continued)
In April 2008, MNC, through its wholly owned subsidiary incorporated in the Cayman Islands, MNC International Limited (“MIL”), acquired approximately 6 million American Depositary Shares (“ADSs”) in a tender offer process and subscribed for approximately 180 million newly issued ordinary shares of Linktone for total consideration of $68.4 million. After giving effect to the subscription, the acquisition of ADSs and ordinary shares in the tender offer, MNC held approximately 57.1% of Linktone’s total outstanding ordinary shares and became the majority shareholder of Linktone.
In May 2010, MNC, through MIL, acquired an additional 0.5 million ADSs from a third party through a privately negotiated transaction. After this acquisition, MNC holds approximately 58.2% of Linktone’s total outstanding ordinary shares.
During 2008, the Company terminated its partnership agreements with Chinese Youth League Internet Film (“CYL”), a subsidiary of Qinghai Satellite Television (“QTV”), and Television Center, a subsidiary of Tianjin Satellite Television (“TJSTV”). The results of our advertising business segment are presented as a discontinued operation for all years in the consolidated financial statements (see Note 5).
To comply with PRC laws and regulations that prohibit or restrict foreign ownership of companies that provide value-added telecommunications services, which include telecom value-added services and internet content services, the Company conducts substantially all of its PRC operations via its VIEs located in the PRC. In addition, to comply with Indonesian laws and regulations that prohibit foreign ownership of investment holding companies, the Company holds its short-term investments in Indonesia via Cakrawala, its VIE located in Indonesia. These VIEs are wholly owned by individuals authorized by the Company, all of whom are either employees or former employees of the Company. The capital is funded by the Company through interest-free loans extended to the authorized individuals. The loans for capital injection are eliminated with the capital of the VIEs on consolidation.
Upon the formation of these VIEs, the Company, through its WFOEs entered into various agreements with its VIEs, through which the Company holds all the variable interests of the VIEs. The principal terms of these agreements with the VIEs are described below.
Powers of Attorney
Each of the shareholders of the VIEs have irrevocably appointed the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, as attorney-in-fact, to vote on their behalf on all matters on which they are entitled to vote with respect to the VIEs as the case may be, including matters relating to the transfer of any or all of their respective equity interests in the VIEs and the appointment of the directors and general manager of the VIEs. The term of each of the powers of attorney is 10 years after which the agreement can be renewed at the Company’s sole discretion. These powers of attorney do not extend to votes by the shareholders of the Company or its subsidiaries.
Operating Agreements
The VIEs have granted the Company a security interest over all of their assets. The Company has the right of first refusal with respect to future loan guarantees. In addition, the VIEs and their shareholders have each agreed that they will not enter into any transaction, or fail to take any action, that would substantially affect their assets, rights and obligations, or business without the Company’s prior written consent. They will also appoint individuals designated by the Company as the directors, officers and other senior management personnel of the VIEs, as well as accept the Company’s guidance regarding their day-to-day operations, financial management and the hiring and dismissal of their employees. The VIEs may not terminate the operating agreements during the term of the agreements, which is 10 years, after which the agreement can be renewed at the Company’s sole discretion.
F-10
LINKTONE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)
Exclusive Consulting Services Agreements
The Company provides most of the VIEs with exclusive consulting services related to legal, finance, human resources and office administration. The services agreements are renewable every year. The service fees payable to the Company are subject to the Company’s adjustment, at its sole discretion, from time to time based on the actual operating results of the VIEs.
Trademark, Domain Name and Software License Agreements
In 2007, the Company granted Weilan and Unilink a license to use the domain name (www.linktone.com) and the Company’s registered trademarks. Linktone Consulting has also granted Weilan and Unilink licenses to use certain of its domain names. In addition, Huitong and Linktone Internet have granted Weilan, Unilink, Lian Fei, Zhong Tong, Qimingxing and Xian Feng multiple licenses to use various software programs relating to the Company’s various platforms, databases and games. The VIEs cannot assign or transfer their rights under the licenses to any third party, and cannot use the licensed trademarks in television, newspapers, magazines, the internet or other public media without the Company’s prior written consent.
Domain Name Transfer Arrangements
The Company transferred to Weilan its ownership rights in the domain name (www.linktone.com) in December 2006.
Contracts Relating to the Exclusive Purchase Right of Equity Interest
The Company or the Company’s designee have an exclusive option to purchase from each such shareholder all or part of his or her equity interest in the VIEs at book value, to the extent permitted by Chinese law. The term of these agreements is 10 years, renewable by the Company for an additional 10-year term at the Company’s sole discretion.
Loan Agreements
The Company has granted interest-free loans to the shareholders of the VIEs for the purpose of providing funds necessary for the capital injection and acquisition of the VIEs. The term of these loans in each case is 10 years. The shareholders of the VIEs can only repay the loans by transferring to the Company or the Company’s designees all of their equity interest in the respective VIE. The interest-free loans to the shareholders of the VIEs as of December 31, 2009 and 2010 were $14.0 million in aggregate.
Equity Interests Pledge Agreements
The shareholders of the Company’s VIEs have pledged their respective equity interests in these entities to guarantee the performance and the payment of the service fees by these entities under the Exclusive Consulting Services Agreements and Software License Agreements described above. If the VIEs breach any of their obligations under the Equity Interests Pledge Agreements, the Company is entitled to sell the equity interests held by the relevant shareholders, and retain the proceeds of such sale or require any of them to transfer to the Company his or her equity interest in the applicable affiliated entity.
Despite the lack of technical majority ownership, there exists a parent-subsidiary relationship between the Company, through its direct ownership of the WFOEs, and the VIEs through the aforementioned agreements, whereby the equity holders of the VIEs effectively assigned all of their voting rights underlying their equity interest in the VIEs to the Company, which gives the Company the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIEs’ economic performance. In addition, through the other aforementioned agreements, the Company demonstrates its ability and intention to continue to exercise the ability to absorb substantially all of the profits and all of the expected losses of the VIEs. Based on these contractual arrangements, the Company consolidates these VIEs as required by Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) subtopic 810-10, “Consolidation: Overall,” because the Company holds all of the variable interests of these VIEs and is the primary beneficiary of the VIEs.
F-11
LINKTONE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)
The Company believes that its contractual arrangements with the VIEs in PRC and Indonesia are in compliance with applicable laws and are legally enforceable. However, uncertainties in the PRC and Indonesian legal systems could limit the Company’s ability, through its direct ownership of the WFOEs, to enforce its rights under these contractual arrangements. Furthermore, shareholders of the VIEs may have interests that are different than those of the Company, which could potentially increase the risk that they would seek to act contrary to the terms of the above aforementioned agreements.
In addition, if the current structure or if any of the contractual arrangements were found to be in violation of any existing or future PRC or Indonesian laws, as applicable, the Group may be subject to penalties, which may include, but not limited to, the cancellation or revocation of the Group’s business and operating licenses, or discontinuance of the Group’s operating activities. The imposition of any of these or other penalties may result in a material and adverse effect on the Group’s operations. In such case, the Company may not be able to operate or control the VIEs, which may result in deconsolidation of the VIEs.
As of December 31, 2009 and 2010, the carrying amount of the aggregate total assets and total liabilities of the VIEs is as follows (in millions of U.S. dollars):
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2009 | | | 2010 | |
PRC | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | | 46.4 | | | | 53.5 | |
Total liabilities | | | 10.7 | | | | 9.3 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Indonesia | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | | 35.3 | | | | 15.8 | |
Total liabilities | | | 0.1 | | | | 0.5 | |
Creditors of the VIEs have no recourse to the general credit of the respective WFOE, which is the primary beneficiary.
2 Basis of presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).
Basis of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of the Company, its subsidiaries, and the VIEs for which the Company, through its direct ownership of the WFOEs, is the primary beneficiary. All significant transactions and balances between the Company, its subsidiaries and VIEs have been eliminated upon consolidation. All subsidiaries are majority owned by the Company. As of December 31, 2010, the Company does not hold any investments accounted for under the cost or equity method.
Foreign currency
The accompanying consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. dollars (“US$”). The functional currency of the Company is US$ while those of the Company’s operating subsidiaries and consolidated VIEs in the PRC, Singapore and Indonesia are the Renminbi (“RMB”), Singapore dollar (“SGD”) and Indonesian rupiah (“IDR”), respectively, as determined based on the criteria of ASC topic 830, “Foreign Currency Matters.” Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are included in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.
All assets and liabilities of our subsidiaries and consolidated VIEs in the PRC, Singapore and Indonesia are translated into US$ at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet dates and revenues and expenses are translated into US$ at the average exchange rates in effect during the reporting periods. The exchange differences resulting from translating these entities’ financial statements into US$ are included in accumulated other comprehensive income, which is a separate component of shareholders’ equity on the consolidated balance sheets.
F-12
LINKTONE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)
3 Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates reflected in the consolidated financial statements include, but are not limited to, revenue recognition, purchase price allocation of its acquisitions, estimated useful lives of long-lived assets, future cash flows associated with impairment testing of goodwill and other long-lived assets, allowance for doubtful accounts, valuation allowance on deferred tax assets, fair value of fixed rate investments, and fair value of share options. Changes in facts and circumstances may result in revised estimates. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
4 Summary of significant accounting policies
(a) Cash equivalents and restricted cash
The Group considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are composed primarily of time deposits and investments in money market accounts that are stated at cost, plus accrued interest, which approximates fair value.
Cash that is legally restricted for withdrawal or use is recorded as restricted cash.
(b) Short-term investments
Short-term investments comprise time deposits with original maturity terms of more than three months but due within one year and marketable equity securities. The marketable securities are classified as available-for-sale and carried at estimated fair value with unrealized gains or losses recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in shareholders’ equity. Realized gains or losses are recognized in the statement of operations during the period in which the gain or loss is realized. If the Company determines a decline in fair value is other than temporary, the cost basis of the individual security is written down to fair value as a new cost basis and the amount of the write-down is accounted for as a realized loss. The new cost basis will not be changed for subsequent recoveries in fair value. Determination of whether declines in value are other-than-temporary requires significant judgment and consideration of various factors including the severity and duration of the impairment, anticipated recovery, financial condition and near-term prospects of the investee, and our ability and intent to hold that security until the anticipated recovery in value occurs. Subsequent increases and decreases in the fair value of available-for-sale investments are included in comprehensive income except for an other-than-temporary impairment, which is recognized in the statement of operations.
The Company invests in marketable equity securities with the intent to make such funds readily available for operating or acquisition purposes and, accordingly, classifies them as short-term investments. Management determines the appropriate classification of its short-term investments and re-evaluates such determination at each balance sheet date.
The carrying values of time deposits approximate fair value because of their short maturities. The Company determines the fair value of marketable equity securities using quoted market prices.
(c) Accounts receivable
An allowance for doubtful accounts is provided based on an aging analysis of accounts receivable balances, historical bad debt rates, repayment patterns, customer credit worthiness and industry trend analysis. The Group also makes a specific allowance if there is strong evidence showing that the receivable is not likely to be recoverable. An account receivable is written off after all collection efforts have ceased.
F-13
LINKTONE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)
(d) Prepaid minimum guarantees
The Group is required to pay nonrefundable minimum guarantees to movie studios in order to obtain the exclusive licensing rights (in Singapore and Malaysia) to distribute various feature films and television series. The amounts paid are recorded as prepaid minimum guarantees on the consolidated balance sheet and subsequently charged to expense in accordance with the terms of the licensing agreement, which typically has a term of one or two years. If all or a portion of the minimum guarantee subsequently appears not to be recoverable through future use of the rights obtained under the license, the nonrecoverable portion shall be charged to expense.
(e) Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is calculated using a weighted-average cost formula and comprises all costs of purchase, costs of conversion and other costs incurred in bringing the inventories to their present location and condition. For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Group recorded a write-down of $51,725. Inventory held at consignment locations is included in finished goods inventory as the Group retains full title and rights to the product.
(f) Property and equipment, net
Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Property and equipment are depreciated over their estimated useful lives on a straight-line basis. The estimated useful lives are as follows:
| | |
|
Office equipment | | 1-3 years |
Computer hardware and other equipment | | 3-5 years |
Motor vehicles | | 7-10 years |
Leasehold improvements | | the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the lease term |
Buildings | | 45 years |
Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. The gain or loss on disposal of property and equipment, if any, is the difference between the net sales proceeds and the carrying amount of the relevant assets, and is recognized in the statement of operations and comprehensive income.
(g) Intangible assets
The Company applies the criteria specified in ASC 805 (“ASC 805”), “Business Combinations,” to determine whether an intangible asset should be recognized separately from goodwill. Intangible assets acquired through business acquisitions are recognized as assets separate from goodwill if they satisfy either the “contractual-legal” or “separability” criteria. Under ASC 350, intangible assets with definite lives are amortized using the straight-line method over their respective estimated useful life. Intangible assets arising from business acquisitions are recognized and measured at fair value upon acquisition. Intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives as follows:
| | |
|
Technology | | 1 - 4 years |
VAS short codes licensed to PT Linktone | | 24 years |
Customer base | | 1 - 4 years |
Licenses | | 1 - 4 years |
Partnership and non-compete agreements | | 1 - 4 years |
Domain names | | 1 - 4 years |
(h) Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired in a business combination. Under ASC 350, goodwill and certain other intangible assets deemed to have indefinite useful lives are not amortized but are tested for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate potential impairment. In December of each year, the Company tests impairment of goodwill at the reporting unit level, defined as the operating segment, and recognizes impairment in the event that the carrying value exceeds the fair value of each reporting unit.
F-14
LINKTONE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)
The provisions of ASC 350 require that a two-step test be performed to assess goodwill for impairment. In the first step, an estimate of the fair value of the reporting unit is performed using expected future discounted cash flows and estimated terminal values. If the net book value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the impairment test is performed, which requires allocation of the reporting unit’s fair value of all of its assets and liabilities in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation, with any residual fair value being allocated to goodwill. The implied fair value of the goodwill is then compared to the carrying value to determine impairment, if any. In December 2009, an impairment charge of $2.5 million was recorded against goodwill assigned to the PC game reporting unit (see Note 16). No impairment of goodwill was recorded in 2008 and 2010.
(i) Impairment of long-lived assets
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable in accordance with ASC 360-10-15, “Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” The Company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets by comparing the carrying amount to the estimated future undiscounted cash flows associated with the related assets. The Company recognizes impairment of long-lived assets in the event that the net book value of such assets exceeds the estimated future undiscounted cash flows attributable to such assets. The Company uses estimates and judgments in its impairment tests and, if different estimates or judgments had been utilized, the timing or the amount of the impairment charges could be different. In 2008, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $591,440 relating to the 3-year contract with TJSTV by Lang Yi following the termination of the relevant contract in September 2008 and recorded an impairment charge of $4,295,649 relating to prepaid television advertising rights for QTV following the termination of the relevant contract in July 2008. No impairment of long-lived assets was recorded in 2009 or 2010.
(j) Revenue recognition
The Group recognizes revenues in the period in which the services are performed or the goods are delivered, provided that persuasive evidence of a contractual arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured.
China VAS & mobile game
The Group’s revenues in the PRC are mainly derived from entertainment-oriented telecom value-added services, including Short Messaging Services (“SMS”), Multimedia Messaging Services (“MMS”), Wireless Application Protocol (“WAP”), JavaTM(“Java games”), Interactive Voice Response Services (“IVR”) and Ring Back (“RB”) services to phone users through various subsidiaries of China Mobile Communications Corporation (“China Mobile”), China United Communications Corporation (“China Unicom”), China Telecom Corporation (“China Telecom”) and China Netcom Corporation. Following the restructuring in the Chinese telecommunications industry initiated by the relevant PRC government authorities in May 2008, the previously existing operators have been consolidated into three new operators, namely China Mobile, China Unicom and China Telecom (collectively, the “Operators”), which can offer both mobile and fixed line services. Fees for these services are charged on a per message basis or on a monthly subscription basis, and vary according to the type of products and services delivered. The Group’s China VAS services are provided through codes the Group owns, known as “Access Codes” or “Short Codes”, which are special telephone numbers shorter than full telephone numbers widely used for value-added services, such as television program voting, ringtone ordering, charity donations and mobile services.
F-15
LINKTONE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)
The Group contracts with the Operators for the transmission of telecom value-added services as well as for billing and collection services. The Group measures its revenues based on the total amount paid by its customers, for which the Operators bill and collect on the Group’s behalf. For this billing and collection service, the Operators retain a fixed percentage fee, which is reflected as a cost of revenue in the financial statements. In addition, for SMS and MMS services, the Operators charge the Group a network usage fee based on a fixed per message rate multiplied by the excess of messages sent over messages received. These network usage fees are likewise retained by the Operators, and are reflected as a cost of revenue in the financial statements. Network usage fees charged to the Group are reduced for messages received by the Group as the Operators separately charge the senders a fee for these transmissions. The Group has assessed its relationship with the Operators and the terms of the fee arrangements under ASC 605-45 (“ASC 605-45”), “Principal Agent Considerations,” and has concluded that reporting the gross amount billed to its customer is appropriate based on the following factors:
| • | | The Group’s ability to adjust the cost of revenue by adjusting the design or marketing of the services; |
| • | | The Group’s ability to control the content of services and suppliers of that content as long as it does not violate applicable PRC law or the relevant policies of the Operators; |
| • | | The Group’s assumption of all related legal and commercial risks arising from the content and services provided; |
|
| • | | The Group’s assumption of risk of non-payment by customers; and |
|
| • | | The Group’s ability to determine prices within ranges prescribed by the Operators. |
A substantial portion of the Group’s revenue from the PRC is recorded based on monthly statements received from provincial-level subsidiaries of the Operators. In certain instances, when a statement is not received within a reasonable period of time, the Group is required to make an estimate of the revenues and cost of revenue earned during the period covered by the statement. On a quarterly basis, the Group estimates a portion of its revenues using internally generated transmission data and various other assumptions the Group has developed based on historical experience, that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009, and 2010, 2.4%, 1.0% and 1.6%, respectively, of the Group’s revenues were based on management’s estimate.
The Group licenses content from independent content providers. Certain of these agreements determine the fees payable for content based on a percentage of revenues of the Group generated from the use of the content. The Group records its revenues inclusive of fees to be paid to content providers as the Group acts as the principal in these arrangements. The fees paid to content providers are recorded in cost of revenue.
The Group’s mobile game service revenue is primarily derived from providing downloadable mobile games products to mobile game operators. The Group contracts with mobile game operators who in turn provide a platform for users to download the Group’s mobile games. The Group earns a fixed fee on a per download basis based on monthly or quarterly statements from the mobile game operators.
Indonesian VAS
The Group’s revenues in Indonesia are derived from entertainment-oriented telecom value-added services to users of mobile telecommunications networks in Indonesia. The Group provides VAS services through agreements with MNC and Infokom, a related party, who in turn have cooperative arrangements with network operators in Indonesia. The Group measures its revenues based on the total amount paid by end users, net of any service fees kept by the network operators in Indonesia as well as any fees retained by MNC and Infokom for leasing Short Codes to the Group. The Group assessed its relationship with MNC, Infokom and the network operators in Indonesia and the terms of the fee arrangements under ASC 605-45, and concluded that reporting the net amount received from MNC and Infokom as revenue is appropriate given that the Group is not the primary obligor in the arrangement. From the perspective of the network operators in Indonesia, MNC and Infokom are the registered service providers. In addition, from the end users’ perspective, MNC and Infokom are responsible for fulfillment of the services.
F-16
LINKTONE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)
A substantial portion of the Group’s revenue from Indonesia is recorded based on monthly statements received from MNC and Infokom. In certain instances, when a statement is not received within a reasonable period of time, the Group is required to make an estimate of the revenues and cost of revenue earned during the period covered by the statement. On a quarterly basis, the Group estimates a portion of its revenues using internally generated transmission data and various other assumptions the Group has developed, that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. For the year ended December 31, 2010, an immaterial amount of the Group’s revenues from Indonesia was based on management’s estimate.
Media contents
The Group’s media sales arrangements are evidenced by individual sales agreements. The prices are stated in the agreements and not subject to adjustment. The Group recognizes revenue from the sale of goods when the risk of loss and title have been transferred to the customer, which usually occurs at the time shipment is made (i.e., destination point). For consignment sales, revenue is recognized when the Group receives notification that the goods have been sold by their customers.
PC game
The Group currently provides its PC game services through its subsidiaries, Brilliant, Wang You, and its VIE, Yuan Hang. The Group receives subscription fees from distributors for the sales of game cards, in either physical or virtual form, with a certain number of game points incorporated in the cards. The corresponding revenue is recognized as the game points are consumed by game players in games. Any sold game cards which are not activated by users and activated points which are not consumed in games constitute deferred revenue. Any game points held by players who are considered to be inactive are deemed consumed and recognized in revenue. The costs of PC game services include the cost of producing the game cards and bandwidth and server leasing charges.
(k) Income and other taxes
The Group accounts for income taxes pursuant to ASC 740-10, “Income Taxes — Overall,” which requires the liability approach for financial accounting and reporting for income taxes. Under this approach, deferred taxes are provided for the tax consequences of temporary differences by applying enacted statutory rates applicable to future years when the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities reverse. A valuation allowance is provided to reduce the amount of deferred tax assets if it is considered more likely than not that some portion of, or all of, the deferred tax asset will not be realized.
The Group applies ASC 740-10, which provides guidance on the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes by prescribing the recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. Interest and penalties related to uncertain income tax liabilities, if and when required, are classified as income tax expense.
PRC
The Group is also subject to business taxes of 3-9% on the provision of taxable services, which include services provided to customers and, in certain instances, consultancy services provided by certain subsidiaries to the VIEs. The related business taxes paid for the services provided to customers and consultancy services are recognized as a reduction of revenues and in operating expenses, respectively.
Huitong and Linktone internet charge software license fees to the VIEs that are subject to value-added tax (“VAT”) at 17%. The Group is entitled to a tax refund equivalent to the portion of VAT expense in excess of 3%. The 3% portion of VAT expense is recognized as sales tax.
Singapore
Goods and services tax (“GST”) is a tax charged on the supply of goods and services made in Singapore and on the importation of goods into Singapore. The current rate for GST is 7%. A company must be GST-registered to collect GST if its annual turnover exceeds SGD 1 million from the sale of taxable goods and services. GST-registered companies may also claim back the GST incurred on their business purchases.
F-17
LINKTONE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)
Indonesia
VAT is imposed on importers, providers of most goods and services, and users of intangible goods. The current VAT rate is 10%. The export of goods from Indonesia is zero-rated (i.e., subject to VAT at 0%).
(l) Advertising expenses
Advertising expenses generally represent the cost of promotions for the Group’s products and services and are expensed as incurred. Advertising expenses totaled $4,505,386, $3,575,313 and $1,892,109 during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively.
(m) Stock-based compensation
The Group accounts for its share options granted to employees in accordance with the provisions of ASC 718, “Compensation — Stock Compensation,” which requires the measurement of the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments (such as employee stock options) at fair value on the grant date. The cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award (the requisite service period). The Group has elected to recognize the compensation costs, net of estimated forfeitures, on a straight-line basis for all share options granted with service conditions that have a graded vesting schedule. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of the grant and revised in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.
(n) Subsidy income
Local governments in some provinces in the PRC grant the Group subsidy income based on a certain percentage of business taxes and income taxes paid by the Group either on a monthly or annual basis. The Group records such local government subsidy income in other income upon receipt. Local government subsidy income totaled $280,464, $382,836 and $467,809 during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively.
(o) Comprehensive income/(loss)
Comprehensive income or loss is defined as the change in equity of the Group during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances, excluding transactions resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners. Accumulated other comprehensive income or loss of the Group includes cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments and unrealized gains or losses on short-term investments.
(p) Earnings per share
In accordance with ASC 260, “Earnings Per Share,” basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income attributable to ordinary shareholders by the weighted-average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of ordinary and dilutive ordinary equivalent shares outstanding during the period. Ordinary equivalent shares consist of ordinary shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding share options (using the treasury stock method). Diluted net income or loss per share for 2009 and 2010 excluded the potentially dilutive effect of 0.6 million and 0.3 million options to purchase ordinary shares, respectively, as their effect was anti-dilutive.
F-18
LINKTONE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)
(q) Fair value of financial instruments
The Company applies ASC 820-10 (“ASC 820-10”), “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” which clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, ASC 820-10 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows: observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets (Level 1); inputs other than the quoted prices in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly, or quoted prices in less active markets (Level 2); and unobservable inputs with respect to which there is little or no market data, which require the Company to develop its own assumptions (Level 3). This hierarchy requires the Company to use observable market data, when available, and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value.
The carrying amount of the Group’s cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, loans receivable from related parties, deposits and other current assets, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other payables approximate their fair value due to the short maturity of those instruments. The Group’s available-for-sale investments are carried at their fair value based on a market interest rate or quoted market price, being Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy, at the reporting date provided by the investment custodian.
(r) Segment reporting
The Group follows ASC 280 (“ASC 280”), “Segment Reporting,” for its segment reporting. The Group is organized into business units based on their different service offerings. The Group’s chief operating decision maker has been identified as the Chief Executive Officer, who reviews and evaluates separate sets of financial information for the Group’s operating segments for the purpose of making decisions regarding resource allocation and performance assessment. In 2008 and 2009, the Group operated in two business segments, namely (i) China VAS & mobile game and (ii) PC game. In 2010, the Group operated in four business segments, namely (i) China VAS & mobile game, (ii) Indonesia VAS, (iii) Media content, and (iv) PC game.
(s) Recent accounting pronouncements
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-28 (“ASU 2010-28”), “Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (ASC 350): When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts.” The objective of this standard is to address questions about entities with reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts because some entities concluded that Step 1 of the test is passed in those circumstances because the fair value of their reporting unit will generally be greater than zero. The amendments in this standard modify Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. This standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2010-28 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-29 (“ASU 2010-29”), “Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations (ASC 805).” The objective of this standard is to address diversity in practice about the interpretation of the pro forma revenue and earnings disclosure requirements for business combinations. This standard specifies that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. This standard also expands the supplemental pro forma disclosures under ASC 805 to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. This standard is effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2010-29 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
F-19
LINKTONE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)
5 Discontinued operations
The Group discontinued its television advertising operations by terminating its partnership agreements with CYL in association with QTV in July 2008 and TJSTV in September 2008. The terminations were in line with the Group’s decision to streamline its operations and return its focus on profitable business segments. As a result of the above terminations, the television advertising business is accounted for as a discontinued operation. Accordingly, the results of the advertising business have been classified as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended December 31, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2010 | |
Gross revenues | | | 12,693,685 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Sales tax | | | (171,873 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
Cost of revenue | | | (22,668,154 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Gross loss | | | (10,146,342 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
Operating (expenses)/income | | | (4,076,540 | ) | | | 596,551 | | | | 315,256 | |
Provision for impairment | | | (6,588,195 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net income/(loss) from discontinued operations before tax | | | (20,811,077 | ) | | | 596,551 | | | | 315,256 | |
Tax benefit | | | 4,069 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net income/(loss) from discontinued operations | | | (20,807,008 | ) | | | 596,551 | | | | 315,256 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
At the discontinuance of the advertising operations, the Group performed a specific review on all the assets and liabilities related to the advertising segment, and provided an allowance for doubtful accounts (included in operating expenses, see Note 10) and impaired other receivables, intangible assets (see Note 15) and other long-term assets. All fixed assets previously used by the advertising operations, such as office equipment and computers, were either transferred to other reporting units or disposed of as of the end of 2008 (see Note 14). Certain liabilities of $361,307 were assumed by CYL. The Group incurred a total impairment loss of $6,588,195 during the year ended December 31, 2008 as a result of the discontinuance decision.
In 2009, the Company received cash of $103,266 from a customer for sales of an advertising time slot run in April 2008 on a revenue-share basis. As the revenue-share amount could not be determined due to lack of available information, the revenue was only recorded upon receipt of cash during the second half of 2009. The Company also adjusted its allowance for doubtful accounts by $389,323 due to cash collected from customers and for its payables by $161,219 due to a reduction in the payable finalized with its suppliers. These adjustments totaling $653,808 recorded in operating income were offset against operating expenses of $57,257.
In 2010, the Company reduced its payables by $315,256 after reaching an agreement with its suppliers whereby the suppliers agreed to waive balances owing to them. Such amount was recorded in operating income.
The following table presents the Group’s advertising business assets and liabilities:
| | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2010 | |
Assets | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | |
Total assets of discontinued operations | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other payables | | | 499,136 | | | | 160,643 | |
Taxes payable | | | 89,991 | | | | 92,784 | |
| | | | | | |
Total liabilities of discontinued operations | | | 589,127 | | | | 253,427 | |
| | | | | | |
There are no carrying values of assets of the discontinued operations as the accounts receivable of $283,028 and $291,812 as of December 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively, have been fully reserved.
F-20
LINKTONE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)
6 Business Combinations
The Group accounts for business combinations using the purchase method of accounting. This method requires that the acquisition cost be allocated to the assets, including separately identifiable tangible and intangible assets, and liabilities the Group has acquired based on their estimated fair values. The Company makes estimates and judgments in determining the fair value of the acquired assets and liabilities with the assistance of independent appraisal reports as well as its experience with similar assets and liabilities in similar industries. If different judgments or assumptions were used, the amounts assigned to the individual assets acquired or liabilities assumed could be materially affected.
(a) Acquisition of Letang
On January 13, 2010, Wei Lan, a VIE of the Group, completed the acquisition of a 50.01% interest in Letang, a private Chinese company specializing in the development of mobile games, for total consideration of RMB46.5 million ($6.8 million). As a result of the acquisition, Letang became a subsidiary of Wei Lan. The primary purpose of the acquisition was to strengthen the Company’s mobile games portfolio and development capabilities.
Purchase consideration
| | | | |
|
Cash consideration (Note (a)) | | | 3,295,115 | |
Contingent consideration in cash (Note (b)) | | | 3,514,836 | |
| | | |
Total fair value of purchase price consideration | | | 6,809,951 | |
| | | |
Details on the purchase consideration are as follows:
| (a) | | The cash consideration was paid in January 2010. |
| (b) | | The contingent consideration payable in cash is determined based on the achievement by Letang of certain net income targets in accordance with the sales and purchase agreement for the 15-month period ended March 31, 2011 and the following 12-month period ending March 31, 2012. The above contingent consideration amounts are derived from the Company’s assessment of whether Letang will meet the certain contractually stipulated targets and the fair value is determined using the income approach through application of the discounted cash flow method. |
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as the date of acquisition:
| | | | |
|
Cash | | | 713,576 | |
Other current assets | | | 69,124 | |
Fixed assets | | | 77,326 | |
Intangible assets | | | 2,420,843 | |
| | | |
Total assets acquired | | | 3,280,869 | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Deferred tax liabilities | | | 283,063 | |
| | | |
Total liabilities assumed | | | 283,063 | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Net assets acquired | | | 2,997,806 | |
| | | |
Aggregate of: | | | | |
Purchase consideration | | | 6,809,951 | |
Non-controlling interest | | | 5,377,698 | |
| | | |
Total | | | 12,187,649 | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Goodwill (Note 16) | | | 9,189,843 | |
| | | |
F-21
LINKTONE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)
The Group has completed the valuations necessary to assess the fair values of the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed, the fair value of non-controlling interest, and the amount of goodwill recognized as of the acquisition date. The fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were determined using the income approach.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information which reflects the Group’s consolidated results of operations as if the acquisition had occurred at the beginning of 2010 and 2009 was not prepared due to the impracticability of estimating such impact.
(b) Acquisition of InnoForm
On March 16, 2010, the Group entered into a purchase agreement to acquire 50% of the share capital of InnoForm, a Singapore corporation specializing in the development, distribution and licensing of edutainment and entertainment products, mainly in Singapore and Malaysia. Under the terms of the agreement, the Group paid SGD 6.5 million (or $4.7 million) in cash for the transaction. On the same day, MNC International Middle East Limited (“MIMEL”), a United Arab Emirates (“UAE”) corporation, which is a subsidiary of MNC, acquired 25% of the share capital of InnoForm. The Group obtained control of InnoForm through direct voting interests and majority representation on the board of directors of InnoForm. The purpose of the acquisition was in line with the Company’s expansion strategy in the region and to enhance the Group’s content portfolio with InnoForm’s product and service offerings.
The purchase price allocation is as follows:
| | | | |
|
Cash | | | 1,597,420 | |
Accounts receivable | | | 3,328,785 | |
Inventory | | | 2,086,848 | |
Other current assets | | | 4,931,419 | |
Fixed assets | | | 3,143,274 | |
Intangible assets | | | 3,288,080 | |
Other non-current assets | | | 1,174,859 | |
| | | |
Total assets acquired | | | 19,550,685 | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Current liabilities | | | 12,577,366 | |
| | | |
Total liabilities assumed | | | 12,577,366 | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Net assets acquired | | | 6,973,319 | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Aggregate of: | | | | |
Purchase consideration | | | 4,737,880 | |
Non-controlling interest | | | 4,596,097 | |
| | | |
Total | | | 9,333,977 | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Goodwill (Note 16) | | | 2,360,658 | |
| | | |
On June 30, 2010, the Company subscribed for 1,002,308 shares newly issued by InnoForm for consideration of SGD 13.0 million (or $9.3 million). After the subscription, the Company’s interest in InnoForm increased to 75% and the increase in ownership was accounted for as an equity transaction. As a result of the transaction, the difference of SGD 684,119 (or $498,655) between the consideration paid by the Company and the adjustment to the carrying amount of the non-controlling interest was recognized as additional paid-in capital.
The Group has completed the valuations necessary to assess the fair values of the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed, the fair value of non-controlling interests, and the amount of goodwill recognized as of the acquisition date. The fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were determined using the income approach.
F-22
LINKTONE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)
The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information which reflects the Group’s consolidated results of operations as if the acquisition had occurred at the beginning of 2010 and 2009 was not prepared due to the impracticability of estimating such impact.
(c) Acquisition of PT Linktone
On June 10, 2010, the Company purchased a mandatory convertible bond (“MCB”) issued by PT Inti Idaman Nusantara (“IDN,” subsequently renamed PT Linktone) from the MCB seller, Starlight Ltd. (“Starlight”), a UAE Company and the MCB holder of IDN, for total consideration of $13.2 million. The MCB is interest free. On September 1, 2010, the Company converted the MCB and became a 51% interest holder of PT Linktone. As a result, PT Linktone became a consolidated subsidiary of the Company. According to the MCB purchase agreements, the Company paid $8.6 million, or 65% of the total consideration, in cash upon the transaction closing date on June 10, 2010, and would pay the remaining $4.6 million, or 35% of the consideration, 12 months after the closing date. As of December 31, 2010, the amount due to Starlight was $4.6 million (Note 18).
The purchase price allocation is as follows:
| | | | |
Cash | | | 360,164 | |
Accounts receivable | | | 3,233,488 | |
Other current assets | | | 801,933 | |
Fixed assets | | | 383,964 | |
Intangible assets | | | 7,062,668 | |
| | | |
Total assets acquired | | | 11,842,217 | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Current liabilities | | | 3,207,944 | |
Deferred tax liabilities | | | 1,765,667 | |
Non-current liabilities | | | 47,405 | |
| | | |
Total liabilities assumed | | | 5,021,016 | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Net assets acquired | | | 6,821,201 | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Aggregate of: | | | | |
Purchase consideration | | | 13,168,568 | |
Non-controlling interest | | | 10,501,275 | |
| | | |
Total | | | 23,669,843 | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Goodwill (Note 16) | | | 16,848,642 | |
| | | |
The Group has completed the valuations necessary to assess the fair values of the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed, the fair value of non-controlling interests, and the amount of goodwill recognized as of the acquisition date. The fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were determined using the income approach.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information which reflects the Group’s consolidated results of operations as if the acquisition had occurred at the beginning of 2010 and 2009 was not prepared due to the impracticability of estimating such impact.
F-23
LINKTONE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)
(d) Acquisition of GLD Investment Pte Ltd
On June 30, 2010, InnoForm acquired a 90% interest in GLD Investment Pte Ltd (“GLD”) from PT Global Land Development TBK (“PTGLD”) for cash consideration of SGD 90,000 ($65,601), and simultaneously subscribed for 686,470 shares newly issued by GLD for cash consideration of SGD 12.94 million ($9.4 million). As a result, InnoForm became a 98.7% interest holder of GLD after the transactions. Prior to the acquisition, 10% of GLD’s equity interest was owned by the chairman of the board of directors and CEO of the Company, and the remaining 90% equity interest was owned by PTGLD, a company owned by the management of PT Bhakti Investama TBK, intermediate holding company of MNC.
The purchase price allocation is set out below:
| | | | |
Cash | | | 9,294,802 | |
Receivables | | | 37,864 | |
Building | | | 9,438,328 | |
Payables and accruals | | | (68,012 | ) |
Related-party borrowings | | | (9,252,532 | ) |
Non-controlling interest | | | (139,212 | ) |
| | | |
Purchase consideration | | | 9,311,238 | |
| | | |
7 Cash and cash equivalents
| | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2010 | |
Cash | | | 64,919,289 | | | | 53,687,227 | |
Investment in money market accounts | | | 14,557,864 | | | | 5,188,172 | |
| | | | | | |
Total | | | 79,477,153 | | | | 58,875,399 | |
| | | | | | |
Interest income earned from the above cash and cash equivalents amounted to $1,148,744, $541,419 and $1,012,497 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009 and 2010, respectively.
8 Restricted cash
As of December 31, 2010, restricted cash amounting to $573,784 relates to cash that was temporarily frozen by a local court of justice for withdrawal or use. On April 30, 2010, Sichuan Province Yangzhou Information Industry Co., Ltd. (“Yangzhou,” the plaintiff) filed two lawsuits against Unilink, a VIE, and Linktone Internet, a subsidiary, alleging that Unilink had breached the wireless value-added service cooperation agreement entered into between Yangzhou and Unilink on June 30, 2008, which resulted in alleged economic losses suffered by the plaintiff. Linktone Internet, as guarantor of Unilink, is jointly liable in the lawsuits. Based on the plaintiff’s application, the local court of justice temporarily froze cash of RMB3.8 million (or $573,784) for the purpose of ensuring enforcement of potential judgments in the lawsuits if decided against Unilink and Linktone Internet.
9 Short-term investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2010 | |
Available-for-sale investments: | | | | | | | | |
- Secured notes, at market value | | | — | | | | 19,800,000 | |
- Privately managed fund, at market value | | | 3,862,377 | | | | 6,001,850 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | 3,862,377 | | | | 25,801,850 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Time deposits | | | 15,840,370 | | | | 8,008,063 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 19,702,747 | | | | 33,809,913 | |
| | | | | | |
On December 20, 2010, the Group purchased secured notes issued by Aerospace Satellite Corporation Holding (“Aerospace Satellite”), a wholly owned subsidiary of PT MNC Sky Vision (“Sky Vision”), for $20 million. The secured notes are traded on Singapore Exchange Ltd., due November 16, 2015, bear interest at a rate of 12.75% per annum, and payable semi-annually in arrears. The secured notes are guaranteed by Sky Vision, a sister company of MNC. Based on the quoted market price, the fair value of the secured notes was $19.8 million as of December 31, 2010.
F-24
LINKTONE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)
The Group also holds an investment in a privately managed fund, which in turn invests in other marketable equity securities. Based on the quoted market price of the marketable equity securities in the fund, the fair value of the fund was $3,862,377 and $6,001,850 as of December 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively. Net unrealized gain on available-for-sale investments included in other comprehensive income amounted to nil, $437,250 and $1,939,473 for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively. Based on the Company’s periodic impairment review, the Company considered the decline in value of $1,476,937 in 2008 to be an other-than-temporary impairment charge, which it charged against earnings during the year ended December 31, 2008.
As of December 31, 2009 and 2010, all time deposits have original maturity terms more than three months and are due within one year.
10 Fair value measurement
ASC 820-10 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:
Level 1—Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
Level 2—Include other inputs that are directly or indirectly observable in the marketplace.
Level 3—Unobservable inputs which are supported by little or no market activity.
ASC 820-10 describes three main approaches to measuring the fair value of assets and liabilities: (1) market approach; (2) income approach and (3) cost approach. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated from market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities. The income approach uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts to a single present value amount. The measurement is based on the value indicated by current market expectations about those future amounts. The cost approach is based on the amount that would currently be required to replace an asset.
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis
In accordance with ASC 820-10, the Group measures cash equivalents, short-term investments, including fixed-rate investments and available-for-sale investments, as well as contingent consideration payable in connection with the Letang acquisition at fair value. Cash equivalents and available-for-sale investments are valued using quoted market prices. The fair value of the Group’s fixed-rate investments are determined based on a discounted cash flow model with market interest rates as discount curve. The fair value of the Group’s contingent consideration payable in connection with Letang acquisition is determined using the income approach through application of the discounted cash flow method.
Asset and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair value measurement at December 31, 2009 | | | | |
| | using: | | | | |
| | Quoted prices in | | | Significant | | | | | | | |
| | active markets | | | other | | | | | | | |
| | for identical | | | observable | | | Unobservable | | | | |
| | assets | | | inputs | | | inputs | | | Fair value at December | |
| | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | | | 31, 2009 | |
Cash equivalents: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Time deposits | | | 35,250,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 35,250,000 | |
Money market fund | | | 14,557,864 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 14,557,864 | |
Short-term investments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fixed-rate investments | | | — | | | | 15,840,370 | | | | — | | | | 15,840,370 | |
Available-for-sale investments | | | 3,862,377 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 3,862,377 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 53,670,241 | | | | 15,840,370 | | | | — | | | | 69,510,611 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
F-25
LINKTONE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair value measurement at December 31, 2010 | | | | |
| | using: | | | | |
| | Quoted prices in | | | Significant | | | | | | | |
| | active markets | | | other | | | | | | | |
| | for identical | | | observable | | | Unobservable | | | | |
| | assets | | | inputs | | | inputs | | | Fair value at December | |
| | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | | | 31, 2010 | |
Cash equivalents: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Time deposits | | | 15,571,126 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 15,571,126 | |
Money market fund | | | 5,188,172 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 5,188,172 | |
Short-term investments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fixed-rate investments | | | — | | | | 8,008,063 | | | | — | | | | 8,008,063 | |
Available-for-sale investments | | | 25,801,850 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 25,801,850 | |
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other payables: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Contingent consideration payable in connection with Letang acquisition | | | — | | | | — | | | | 3,623,899 | | | | 3,623,899 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 46,561,148 | | | | 8,008,063 | | | | 3,623,899 | | | | 58,193,110 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
The following table presents a reconciliation for the Group’s liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis, using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the year ended December 31, 2010:
| | | | |
| | Significant unobservable | |
| | inputs (Level 3) | |
Fair value at January 1, 2010 | | | — | |
Contingent consideration payable in connection with Letang acquisition | | | 3,623,899 | |
Changes in the fair value | | | — | |
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 | | | — | |
| | | |
Fair value at December 31, 2010 | | | 3,623,899 | |
| | | |
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis
The Group measures certain financial assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis only if an impairment charge were to be recognized. The Group’s non-financial assets, such as intangible assets, goodwill and fixed assets, would be measured at fair value only if they were determined to be impaired. For the year ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, the Group recognized impairment loss on goodwill of nil, $2,500,000 and nil, with a charge to earnings, based on the fair value measurement (Level 3) on a non-recurring basis. The fair value was determined using a discounted cash flow model under the income approach based on future revenues and operating costs, using internal projections.
F-26
LINKTONE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)
11 Accounts receivable, net
| | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2010 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable | | | 13,965,543 | | | | 17,737,019 | |
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts | | | (2,126,946 | ) | | | (2,245,540 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| | | 11,838,597 | | | | 15,491,479 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Movement in allowance for doubtful accounts: | | | | | | | | |
Balance at beginning of year | | | (1,819,021 | ) | | | (2,126,946 | ) |
Write-offs | | | 389,322 | | | | — | |
Additional provision | | | (697,247 | ) | | | (118,594 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Balance at end of year | | | (2,126,946 | ) | | | (2,245,540 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Gross accounts receivable includes those of discontinued operations of $283,028 (allowance of $283,028) and $291,812 (allowance of $291,812) as of December 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively.
12 Inventory
| | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2010 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Raw materials | | | — | | | | 263,318 | |
Finished goods | | | — | | | | 2,093,123 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | — | | | | 2,356,441 | |
Allowance for inventory obsolescence | | | — | | | | (51,725 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Total | | | — | | | | 2,304,716 | |
| | | | | | |
As of December 31, 2010, the Group has $306, 609 of inventory held at consignment locations which are included in finished goods.
13 Deposits and other current assets
| | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2010 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Prepaid minimum guarantees | | | — | | | | 2,837,186 | |
Rental and other deposits | | | 1,083,279 | | | | 715,340 | |
Staff advances | | | 292,652 | | | | 323,794 | |
Prepayments to VAS advertising, content and other suppliers | | | 735,655 | | | | 1,954,469 | |
Interest income receivable from non-related parties | | | 105,438 | | | | — | |
Others | | | 380,741 | | | | 845,863 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | 2,597,765 | | | | 6,676,652 | |
Less: Allowance for doubtful receivables | | | (240,141 | ) | | | (92,406 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Total | | | 2,357,624 | | | | 6,584,246 | |
| | | | | | |
F-27
LINKTONE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)
14 Property and equipment, net
| | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2010 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cost | | | | | | | | |
Leasehold property — held for sale | | | — | | | | 819,578 | |
Buildings | | | — | | | | 10,285,440 | |
Computer hardware and other equipment | | | 3,559,421 | | | | 3,972,530 | |
Office equipment | | | 831,225 | | | | 1,962,539 | |
Leasehold improvements | | | 187,479 | | | | — | |
Motor vehicles | | | — | | | | 344,567 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | 4,578,125 | | | | 17,384,654 | |
Less: Accumulated depreciation | | | (4,047,356 | ) | | | (4,768,686 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| | | 530,769 | | | | 12,615,968 | |
| | | | | | |
During the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, the depreciation charges amounted to $1,076,743 (including discontinued operations of $130,685), $556,239 and $721,451, respectively.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Group disposed of property and equipment in connection with discontinued operations and incurred a loss of $593,861. The Group incurred losses of $41,964 and $12,828 from disposal of property and equipment during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively.
15 Intangible assets, net
The following table summarizes intangible assets, net:
| | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31 | |
| | 2009 | | | 2010 | |
Cost | | | | | | | | |
Technology | | | 1,831,344 | | | | 2,559,208 | |
Customer base | | | 28,000 | | | | 171,523 | |
Licenses | | | 525,671 | | | | 525,671 | |
Partnership and non-compete agreements | | | 2,501,285 | | | | 7,360,921 | |
Domain names | | | 82,347 | | | | 82,347 | |
VAS Short Codes licensed to PT Linktone | | | — | | | | 7,076,792 | |
Software | | | — | | | | 183,064 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | 4,968,647 | | | | 17,959,526 | |
Accumulated amortization | | | (4,862,608 | ) | | | (6,413,299 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Acquired intangible assets, net | | | 106,039 | | | | 11,546,227 | |
| | | | | | |
During the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, the aggregate amortization charges amounted to $848,219 (including discontinued operations of $224,033), $65,199 and $1,550,691, respectively.
The estimated amortization expense for each of the succeeding five years is as follows:
| | | | |
2011 | | | 1,975,278 | |
2012 | | | 1,819,451 | |
2013 | | | 1,267,128 | |
2014 | | | 708,946 | |
2015 | | | 308,795 | |
| | | |
| | | 6,079,598 | |
| | | |
F-28
LINKTONE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)
16 Goodwill
The following table summarizes the activity in the balance of goodwill during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2010 by reporting unit:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2009 | |
| | China VAS & | | | | |
| | mobile game | | | Indonesia VAS | | | Media content | | | PC game | | | Total | |
Balance at beginning of year | | | 8,550,715 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 6,033,497 | | | | 14,584,212 | |
Goodwill recognized from acquisitions | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Goodwill impairment | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (2,500,000 | ) | | | (2,500,000 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at end of year | | | 8,550,715 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 3,533,497 | | | | 12,084,212 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2010 | |
| | China VAS & | | | | |
| | mobile game | | | Indonesia VAS | | | Media content | | | PC game | | | Total | |
Balance at beginning of year | | | 8,550,715 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 3,533,497 | | | | 12,084,212 | |
Goodwill recognized from acquisitions | | | 9,189,843 | | | | 16,848,642 | | | | 2,360,658 | | | | — | | | | 28,399,143 | |
Goodwill impairment | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at end of year | | | 17,740,558 | | | | 16,848,642 | | | | 2,360,658 | | | | 3,533,497 | | | | 40,483,355 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As of December 31, 2010, the Company performed impairment tests on goodwill assigned to each reporting unit in a two-step process. The Company determined the fair value of the reporting units using the income approach based on the discounted expected future cash flows associated with these units. The discounted cash flows for each reporting unit were based on five-year projections using compound annual growth rates of 15%, 47%, 7% and 28% for China VAS & mobile game, Indonesia VAS, PC game and Media content reporting units, respectively (2009: 17% and 8% for China VAS & mobile game and PC game reporting units). Cash flow projections were based on past experience, actual operating results and management’s best estimates about future developments as well as certain market assumptions. Cash flows after the fifth year were estimated using a terminal value calculation, which adopted terminal value growth rates of 4% for Indonesia VAS, and 3% for China VAS & mobile game, PC game and Media content reporting units. The discount rates used in the valuations reflect a market assessment of the risks specific to each reporting unit and are based on the weighted-average cost of capital for the respective reporting units. The discount rates used were 19% for China VAS & mobile game, Indonesia VAS, PC game and 18% for Media content reporting units (2009: 18% and 19%, respectively for PC game and China VAS & mobile game). Based on the annual impairment tests as of December 31, 2010, the above reporting units’ fair values are higher than their carrying value, respectively, and management did not identify any impairment.
The expected future cash flows for the PC game reporting unit were revised downward in light of lower than expected revenue earned in the second half of 2009 due to market competition and management reorganization in this reporting unit in the last quarter of 2009. As a result, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $2,500,000 in the PC game reporting unit in 2009. This reduced the carrying amount of goodwill related to the PC game reporting unit to $3,533,497 as of December 31, 2009.
F-29
LINKTONE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)
17 Other long-term assets
| | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2010 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Investment deposit (a) | | | 2,470,382 | | | | 2,470,382 | |
Prepaid minimum guarantees | | | — | | | | 1,101,231 | |
Prepayment for insurance policy | | | 364,276 | | | | 1,398,195 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | 2,834,658 | | | | 4,969,808 | |
Less: Impairment loss on investment deposit (a) | | | (2,470,382 | ) | | | (2,470,382 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Total | | | 364,276 | | | | 2,499,426 | |
| | | | | | |
| | |
(a) | | In April 2007, the Company paid an investment deposit of $3 million to eChinaCash Inc. (“eCC”) to purchase 49% of the equity in eChinaMobile (BVI) Ltd. (“eCM”), a wholly owned subsidiary of eCC. eCM is a U.S. incorporated, Beijing-based company that builds and maintains customer loyalty affinity programs and payment card programs for large corporations and financial institutions, including Chinese blue chip companies. The primary objective of eCM was to establish a platform to provide VAS service and original content to customers of Linktone and eCM through cross-selling opportunities that arise through having access to each other’s extensive database of users. Because of certain disputes over the resources to be made available for use by eCM, eCM refunded $529,618 of Linktone’s investment deposit of $3 million in January 2008. Linktone has sought legal remedies to recover the remaining amount. In view of the uncertainty of recovering this remaining amount, the Company recorded an impairment provision of $2,470,382 in 2007 against the remaining investment deposit. |
18 Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other payables
| | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2010 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | | 806,297 | | | | 4,333,146 | |
Accrued payroll and welfare benefits | | | 192,458 | | | | 592,258 | |
Accrued professional and consulting fees | | | 280,165 | | | | 71,863 | |
Payable for acquisition of Letang (Note 6(a)) | | | — | | | | 2,083,742 | |
Payable for acquisition of PT Linktone MCB (Note 6(c)) | | | — | | | | 4,608,983 | |
Accrued VAS content fees | | | 5,138,487 | | | | 7,413,215 | |
Accrued expenses | | | 1,113,883 | | | | 2,221,885 | |
Other payables | | | 384,062 | | | | 1,646,064 | |
| | | | | | |
Total | | | 7,915,352 | | | | 22,971,156 | |
| | | | | | |
19 Other long-term liabilities
| | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2010 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Payable for acquisition of Letang (Note 6(a)) | | | — | | | | 1,540,157 | |
Other long-term payables | | | — | | | | 871,911 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | — | | | | 2,412,068 | |
| | | | | | |
20 Segment information
Following the acquisitions in 2010, the Group operates in four business segments — China VAS & mobile game, Indonesia VAS, Media content and PC game. Pursuant to ASC 280, the Company presents summarized statement of operations and net assets information by segment below, as used by the Group’s chief operating decision maker.
F-30
LINKTONE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)
Statement of Operations Information:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2008 | |
| | China VAS & | | | | |
| | mobile game | | | Indonesia VAS | | | Media content | | | PC game | | | Total | |
Gross revenues | | | 65,054,065 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,971,737 | | | | 67,025,802 | |
Sales tax | | | (2,417,247 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (102,872 | ) | | | (2,520,119 | ) |
Segment cost of revenue | | | (33,764,103 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (73,527 | ) | | | (33,837,630 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Segment gross profit | | | 28,872,715 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,795,338 | | | | 30,668,053 | |
Segment operating expenses | | | (25,551,911 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (657,147 | ) | | | (26,209,058 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Segment profit from operations | | | 3,320,804 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,138,191 | | | | 4,458,995 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2009 | |
| | China VAS & | | | | |
| | mobile game | | | Indonesia VAS | | | Media content | | | PC game | | | Total | |
Gross revenues | | | 61,120,605 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,096,089 | | | | 62,216,694 | |
Sales tax | | | (2,236,198 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (67,091 | ) | | | (2,303,289 | ) |
Segment cost of revenue | | | (38,842,429 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (98,843 | ) | | | (38,941,272 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Segment gross profit | | | 20,041,978 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 930,155 | | | | 20,972,133 | |
Segment operating expenses | | | (19,983,960 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (872,015 | ) | | | (20,855,975 | ) |
Segment impairment charge | | | 431,873 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (2,500,000 | ) | | | (2,068,127 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Segment profit/(loss) from operations | | | 489,891 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (2,441,860 | ) | | | (1,951,969 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2010 | |
| | China VAS & | | | | | | | | |
| | mobile game | | | Indonesia VAS | | | Media content | | | PC game | | | Total | |
Gross revenues | | | 56,578,054 | | | | 1,805,746 | | | | 12,210,519 | | | | 1,113,706 | | | | 71,708,025 | |
Sales tax | | | (2,035,197 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (51,924 | ) | | | (2,087,121 | ) |
Segment cost of revenue | | | (37,616,795 | ) | | | (587,532 | ) | | | (8,824,211 | ) | | | (108,856 | ) | | | (47,137,394 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Segment gross profit | | | 16,926,062 | | | | 1,218,214 | | | | 3,386,308 | | | | 952,926 | | | | 22,483,510 | |
Segment operating expenses | | | (18,966,796 | ) | | | (266,867 | ) | | | (4,691,928 | ) | | | (691,534 | ) | | | (24,617,125 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Segment profit/(loss) from operations | | | (2,040,734 | ) | | | 951,347 | | | | (1,305,620 | ) | | | 261,392 | | | | (2,133,615 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
F-31
LINKTONE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)
Balance Sheet Information:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, 2009 | |
| | China VAS & | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | mobile game | | | Indonesia VAS | | | Media content | | | PC game | | | Total | |
Current assets | | | 122,253,192 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 5,065,780 | | | | 127,318,972 | |
Non-current assets | | | 12,926,989 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 181,571 | | | | 13,108,560 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | | 135,180,181 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 5,247,351 | | | | 140,427,532 | |
Current liabilities | | | (11,028,838 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (507,673 | ) | | | (11,536,511 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | (11,028,838 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (507,673 | ) | | | (11,536,511 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets | | | 124,151,343 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 4,739,678 | | | | 128,891,021 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, 2010 | |
| | China VAS & | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | mobile game | | | Indonesia VAS | | | Media content | | | PC game | | | Total | |
Current assets | | | 101,532,213 | | | | 5,618,519 | | | | 12,298,493 | | | | 4,610,039 | | | | 124,059,264 | |
Non-current assets | | | 23,832,210 | | | | 25,793,506 | | | | 17,535,705 | | | | 56,035 | | | | 67,217,456 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | | 125,364,423 | | | | 31,412,025 | | | | 29,834,198 | | | | 4,666,074 | | | | 191,276,720 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities | | | (17,459,454 | ) | | | (4,326,123 | ) | | | (10,884,252 | ) | | | (743,749 | ) | | | (33,413,578 | ) |
Non-current liabilities | | | (1,540,157 | ) | | | (2,615,377 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (4,155,534 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | (18,999,611 | ) | | | (6,941,500 | ) | | | (10,884,252 | ) | | | (743,749 | ) | | | (37,569,112 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets | | | 106,364,812 | | | | 24,470,525 | | | | 18,949,946 | | | | 3,922,325 | | | | 153,707,608 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The following table summarizes the Group’s gross revenues by geographic region based on the location of the customers:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2010 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
PRC | | | 67,025,802 | | | | 62,216,694 | | | | 57,691,760 | |
Indonesia | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,805,746 | |
Singapore | | | — | | | | — | | | | 11,596,837 | |
Malaysia | | | — | | | | — | | | | 613,682 | |
The following table summarizes the Group’s total assets by geographic region:
| | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2010 | |
| | | | | | | | |
PRC | | | 105,083,092 | | | | 114,218,378 | |
Indonesia | | | 35,344,440 | | | | 47,224,144 | |
Singapore | | | — | | | | 27,785,182 | |
Malaysia | | | — | | | | 2,049,016 | |
21 Risks and uncertainties
(a) Dependence on the Operators
The Group’s PRC VAS revenue is mainly derived from cooperative arrangements with the operators in the PRC. If the strategic relationship with the Operators in the PRC is terminated or scaled back or if the operators alter the revenue-sharing arrangements, the Group’s VAS business would be adversely affected. Revenues and amounts due from operators that account for more than 10% of the Group’s gross revenues accounts receivable in a particular year are as follows:
| • | | Revenues earned from China Mobile for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 were $49.0 million, $46.3 million and $37.6 million, respectively, representing 73%, 74% and 52% of gross revenues, respectively. |
| • | | Amounts due from China Mobile as of 2009 and 2010 amounted to $10.8 million and $10.4 million, respectively, representing 75% and 82% of accounts receivable, respectively. |
| • | | Revenues earned from China Telecom for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 were $7.5 million, $7.9 million and $9.6 million, respectively, representing 11%, 13% and 13% of gross revenues, respectively. |
| • | | Amounts due from China Telecom as of December 31, 2009 and 2010 amounted to $1.3 million and $1.2 million, respectively, representing 9% and 10% of accounts receivable, respectively. |
F-32
LINKTONE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)
(b) Credit risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentration of credit risk primarily consist of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and accounts receivable. The Company has $93.0 million in cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments. The Company has $30.8 million in cash, bank deposits and money market funds in the PRC, which constitute 33.8% of total cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments. In the event of bankruptcy of one of the financial institutions in which the Group has deposits or investments, it may be unlikely to claim its deposits or investments back in full.
Accounts receivable are typically unsecured and derived from revenue earned from customers and Operators in China, which are exposed to credit risk. The risk is mitigated by credit evaluations the Company performs on its customers and its ongoing monitoring process of outstanding balances. The Company maintains reserves for estimated credit losses and these losses have generally been within its expectations.
(c) Foreign exchange risk
The Group’s sales, purchase and expense transactions are generally denominated in RMB, SGD and IDR and a significant portion of the Group’s assets and liabilities are denominated in RMB. The RMB is not freely convertible into foreign currencies. In the PRC, foreign exchange transactions are required by law to be transacted only by authorized financial institutions at exchange rates set by the People’s Bank of China (“PBOC”). Remittances in currencies other than RMB by the Group in the PRC must be processed through the PBOC or other PRC foreign exchange regulatory bodies and require certain supporting documentation in order to affect the remittance.
There are currently no such legal foreign exchange controls in Singapore and Indonesia.
(d) Legal and regulatory uncertainties
PRC
The Chinese market poses certain legal and regulatory risks and uncertainties to the Group’s operations. These uncertainties extend to the ability of the Group to develop its telecom VAS business and to provide internet services in the PRC. Though the PRC has, since 1978, implemented a wide range of market-oriented economic reforms, continued reforms and progress towards a full market-oriented economy are uncertain. In addition, the telecommunication and internet industries remain highly regulated. Restrictions are currently in place or are unclear with regard to which specific industry segments foreign-owned entities, like the Group, may operate. The Group’s legal structure and scope of operations in the PRC could be subject to restrictions which could result in severe limitations on the Group’s ability to conduct business in the PRC, and this could have a material adverse impact on the Group’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
F-33
LINKTONE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)
Indonesia
The Group operates in a legal and regulatory environment in Indonesia that is undergoing change. The reformed regulation of the Indonesian telecommunications sector, which was initiated by the Indonesian Government in 1999, has to a certain extent resulted in the liberalization of the telecommunications industry, including facilitation of new market entrants for telecommunications service providers and changes to the competitive structure of the telecommunications industry. As we rely on our partnership with the telecommunications service providers and depend to a significant degree on the uninterrupted operation of their network to provide our VAS services, any disruption could have a material adverse impact on the Group’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
22 Employee Benefits
PRC contribution plan
Full-time employees of the Company, its subsidiaries and VIEs in the PRC participate in a government-mandated multi-employer defined contribution plan pursuant to which certain pension benefits, medical care, unemployment insurance, employee housing fund and other welfare benefits are provided to employees. Chinese labor regulations require that the Company and its subsidiaries accrue for these benefits based on certain percentages of the employees’ salaries. The total provision for such employee benefits was $1,279,540 (including discontinued operations of $234,149), $951,330 and $1,055,043 for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively.
Singapore contribution plan
A defined contribution plan is a post-employment benefit plan under which an entity pays fixed contributions into a separate entity such as the Central Provident Fund or pension on a mandatory, contractual or voluntary basis. The entity will have no legal or constructive obligation to pay further amounts once the contributions have been paid. Obligations for contributions to defined contribution pension plans are recognized as an employee benefit expense in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income/loss in the periods during which services are rendered by employees. In 2010, the Group, via its Singaporean subsidiary acquired during the year, recorded a provision of $286,262.
Indonesian contribution plan
PT Linktone, the Group’s Indonesian subsidiary, has a defined contribution pension program in which it had entered into a Cooperation Agreement Pension Benefit Service Program with the Financial Institution Pension Fund in October 2009 for an indefinite period of cooperation. The total provision for such employee benefits of $18,398 was charged to the statement of operations and comprehensive income/loss during the year ended December 31, 2010.
23 Statutory Reserves
The Company’s subsidiaries and VIEs in the PRC must make appropriations from after-tax profits to non-distributable reserve funds. Its subsidiaries, in accordance with the laws on Enterprise with Foreign Investment in China, must make appropriations to (i) a general reserve and (ii) an enterprise expansion fund. The general reserve fund requires annual appropriations of 10% of after-tax profit, as determined under generally accepted accounting principles in the PRC (“PRC GAAP”) at each year end, until such fund has reached 50% of the subsidiary’s registered capital. The enterprise expansion fund appropriation is at the subsidiary’s discretion. The Company’s VIEs, in accordance with PRC Company Laws, may make appropriations to (i) a statutory reserve fund and (ii) a discretionary surplus fund. The statutory reserve fund requires annual appropriations of 10% of after-tax profit, as determined under PRC GAAP at each year end, until such fund has reached 50% of the VIE’s registered capital. Discretionary surplus fund appropriation is at the VIE’s discretion.
F-34
LINKTONE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)
The general reserve fund and statutory reserve fund can only be used for specific purposes, such as offsetting of accumulated losses, enterprise expansion or increasing the registered capital. The enterprise expansion fund is generally used to expand the production and operations; however, it also may be used for increasing the registered capital. The discretionary surplus fund may be used for any purposes at management’s discretion. These funds are not transferable to the Company in the form of cash dividends, loans or advances.
During the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, the Group appropriated after-tax profits of $105,757, nil and nil, respectively, to these reserve funds. As of December 31, 2009 and 2010, the Group had appropriated $2,466,165 and $2,466,165, respectively, to these non-distributable reserve funds. No transfers were made to reserve funds in 2009 and 2010 either because such funds have reached 50% of the respective company’s registered capital or because the respective company was in a loss position.
24 Income taxes
Cayman Islands, British Virgin Islands and UAE
Under the current laws of the Cayman Islands, British Virgin Islands and UAE, Linktone, Brilliant, Ojava Overseas and Linktone International are not subject to tax on income or capital gains.
Hong Kong
Under the current laws of Hong Kong, Noveltech, InnoForm HK and Linktone Media are subject to tax on income in Hong Kong at 16.5%.
Indonesia
Under the current laws of the Republic of Indonesia, PT Linktone and Cakrawala is subject to tax on income at 25% (2009: 28%).
Singapore
Under the current laws of the Republic of Singapore, InnoForm Media and its subsidiaries in Singapore are subject to tax on income at 17%.
Malaysia
Under the current laws of Malaysia, InnoForm Malaysia is subject to tax on income at 25%.
PRC
On March 16, 2007, the National People’s Congress of China approved the new Enterprise Income Tax Law of the PRC (the “new EIT law”), which is effective from January 1, 2008.
The new EIT law imposes a unified income tax of 25%. The new EIT law allows a five-year transitional period for entities established before March 16, 2007 that enjoyed a reduced tax rate or a tax holiday under the old EIT law. The transitional rule generally provides for a gradual increase to 25% and, where applicable, continuation of prior tax holidays until their expiration otherwise provided under the old EIT law. Under the new EIT law, qualified and approved high and new technology enterprises enjoy a preferential income tax rate of 15%.
The applicable income tax rates for the Group’s PRC subsidiaries and VIEs vary. Linktone Consulting, Weilan, Ruida, Wei Lian, Lang Yi, Xian Feng, Letang and Xintong’s applicable tax rates are 25% starting 2008.
Zhong Tong, Linktone Software, Wang You and Ling Yu are located in either the economic development zones in coastal cities or the Pudong new district. Accordingly, they are subject to a preferential statutory rate of 15% pre-2008. The reduced tax rate is transitioned to 25% starting in 2008 and the transitional rates are 20% and 22% for 2009 and 2010, respectively.
F-35
LINKTONE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)
Huitong and Linktone Internet are foreign investment production enterprises located in a coastal economic development zone in the old urban district. Approved by tax bureau in May 2010. Huitong was recognized as high and new technology enterprise and, therefore, would be entitled to a favorable tax rate of 15% for the years 2009 to 2011, subject to meeting certain criteria on an annual basis. Linktone Internet started its tax holiday of two years exemption followed by three years of 50% reduced tax rate from 2005 and enjoyed 12.5% tax rate in 2008 and 2009. Its applicable tax rate starting 2010 is 25%.
Yuan Hang, Cosmos, Lian Fei and Beijing Ojava were high and new technology enterprises prior to January 1, 2008 and enjoyed a reduced tax rate of 15% and tax holiday of either two or three years of exemption followed by three years of 50% reduced tax rate. Yuan Hang’s tax holiday started in 2004 and expired in 2008. Cosmos’ tax holiday started in 2003 and expired in 2008. Lian Fei’s tax holiday started in 2002 and expired in 2007. Beijing Ojava’s tax holiday started in 2004 and expired in 2009. Furthermore, Yuan Hang, Cosmos, and Beijing Ojava qualified as high and new technology enterprises, which is effective starting in 2008 and enjoyed the reduced tax rate of 15%, instead of the tax holiday for Cosmos and Beijing Ojava, for 2009 and 2010.
Unilink, Qimingxing and Lianyu are considered as small businesses and are taxed based on the deemed profit method.
The new PRC Enterprise Income Tax Laws (the “PRC Income Tax Laws”) also impose a 10% withholding income tax for dividends distributed by a foreign invested enterprise to its immediate holding company outside the PRC, which were exempted under the previous income tax and rules. A lower withholding tax rate will be applied if there is a tax treaty arrangement between the PRC and the jurisdiction of the foreign holding company.
In accordance with the PRC Income Tax Laws effective from January 1, 2008, enterprises established under the laws of foreign countries or regions and whose “place of effective management” is located within the PRC territory are considered PRC resident enterprises, subject to the PRC income tax at the rate of 25% on worldwide income. The definition of “place of effective management” shall refer to an establishment that exercises, in substance, overall management and control over the production and business, personnel, accounting, properties, etc. of an enterprise. The Group’s non-PRC entities, if considered a PRC tax residence enterprise for tax purposes, would be subject to the PRC Enterprise Income Tax at the rate of 25% on their worldwide income. Income (loss) before income taxes from continuing operations consists of:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended December 31, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2010 | |
Cayman | | | (1,960,664 | ) | | | (75,287 | ) | | | (2,879,085 | ) |
Indonesia | | | — | | | | 314,378 | | | | 2,673,218 | |
Singapore | | | — | | | | — | | | | (1,710,126 | ) |
Malaysia | | | — | | | | — | | | | 223,771 | |
PRC | | | 7,055,929 | | | | (145,480 | ) | | | 2,539,084 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total income before taxes from continued operations | | | 5,095,265 | | | | 93,611 | | | | 846,862 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
The (provision for) benefit from taxes on income from continuing operations consists of:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended December 31, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2010 | |
Current | | | (1,164,460 | ) | | | (14,889 | ) | | | (1,805,227 | ) |
Deferred | | | 378,403 | | | | (564,381 | ) | | | 365,966 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | (786,057 | ) | | | (579,270 | ) | | | (1,439,261 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
F-36
LINKTONE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)
The following is reconciliation between the statutory Enterprise Income Tax rate and the Group’s effective tax rate for continuing operations:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended December 31, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2010 | |
Statutory Enterprise Income Tax rate | | | 25 | % | | | 25 | % | | | 25 | % |
Effect of tax holiday | | | (6 | )% | | | 54 | % | | | — | |
International tax rate differences | | | 5 | % | | | (2 | )% | | | 99 | % |
Non-deductible expenses/non-taxable income | | | (12 | )% | | | (106 | )% | | | 1 | % |
Change in valuation allowance | | | 9 | % | | | 656 | % | | | (48 | )% |
PRC tax rate differences | | | (3 | )% | | | (133 | )% | | | (8 | )% |
Unrecognized tax benefit | | | — | | | | 30 | % | | | 4 | % |
Change in tax law | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Adjustment to prior-year tax provision | | | (3 | )% | | | (93 | )% | | | 97 | % |
Deferred tax on outside basis tax | | | — | | | | 188 | % | | | — | |
Effective EIT rate for continuing operations | | | 15 | % | | | 619 | % | | | 170 | % |
The aggregate effect of the tax holiday in 2008, 2009 and 2010 was $286,000, $51,000, nil, respectively.
The Group’s deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at each balance sheet date are as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2010 | |
Deferred tax assets: | | | | | | | | |
Establishment costs | | | 6,601 | | | | 1,986 | |
Property and equipment | | | 125,142 | | | | 123,813 | |
Intangible and other assets | | | 463,612 | | | | 208,550 | |
Deferred revenue | | | 52,656 | | | | 277,779 | |
Accrued liabilities and other payables | | | 3,582,154 | | | | 3,680,306 | |
Advertising expenses | | | 417,851 | | | | 343,704 | |
Net operating losses | | | 1,756,000 | | | | 1,980,258 | |
| | | | | | |
Total deferred tax assets for continuing operations | | | 6,404,016 | | | | 6,616,396 | |
Valuation allowance for continuing operations | | | (2,493,972 | ) | | | (2,139,558 | ) |
Total deferred tax assets for discontinued operations | | | 5,071,306 | | | | 5,464,105 | |
Valuation allowance for discontinued operations | | | (4,857,314 | ) | | | (5,320,546 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Total deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance | | | 4,124,036 | | | | 4,620,397 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Deferred tax liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Accrued income | | | (2,966,583 | ) | | | (3,138,136 | ) |
Intangible assets | | | — | | | | (2,833,562 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Deferred tax liabilities for continuing operations | | | (2,966,583 | ) | | | (5,971,698 | ) |
Deferred tax liabilities for discontinued operations | | | (213,992 | ) | | | (143,559 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Total deferred tax liabilities | | | (3,180,575 | ) | | | (6,115,257 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net deferred tax assets/(liabilities) | | | 943,461 | | | | (1,494,860 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Deferred tax assets — current | | | 1,176,933 | | | | 1,254,529 | |
Deferred tax liabilities — current | | | (256,736 | ) | | | (1,078,403 | ) |
Deferred tax assets — non-current | | | 23,264 | | | | 72,480 | |
Deferred tax liabilities — non-current | | | — | | | | (1,743,466 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Net deferred tax assets/(liabilities) | | | 943,461 | | | | (1,494,860 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Management has assessed whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The Group recorded a valuation allowance of $7,351,286 and $7,460,104 as of December 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively, to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amount management believes is more likely than not realizable.
F-37
LINKTONE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)
The Group has a net tax operating loss carry forward of approximately $28,574,884 attributed to 12 PRC subsidiaries (including discontinued operations of $20,178,542) as of December 31, 2010. The net operating losses will expire between 2011 and 2015 if unutilized.
The Company intends to permanently reinvest all undistributed earnings of its foreign subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010. The amount of unrecognized deferred tax liabilities for temporary differences related to investments in foreign subsidiaries is not determined because such a determination is not practicable.
During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company recorded an unrecognized tax benefit of $100,671 related to promotional and research and development expenses. All of the unrecognized tax benefit, if recognized, would impact income tax expense. It is possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefit will change in the next twelve months; however, an estimate of the range of the possible change cannot be made at this time.
| | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended December 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2010 | |
Beginning balance | | | 100,671 | | | | 100,671 | |
Increases related to prior-year positions | | | — | | | | — | |
Increases related to current-year positions | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | |
Ending balance | | | 100,671 | | | | 100,671 | |
| | | | | | |
The Group recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. The Group recorded interest of $98,940 and $129,693 as of December 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively.
The Group’s tax years 2006 through 2010 remain open to possible examination by relevant tax authorities.
25 Stock option plans
The Board of Directors approved two stock options plans: the 2000-1 Employee Stock Option Scheme and 2003 Stock Incentive Plan (together referred to as “2003 Plans”) in November 2003. The 2003 Plans govern all stock incentive awards since November 2003. The plans provide for the grant of share options to employees, directors and consultants. Options are granted with a term of up to 10 years and generally vest over service periods that range from one to four years. The plans are administered by the Compensation Committee designated by the Board of Directors.
The 2003 Plans include a mechanism for an automatic annual increase in the number of ordinary shares available under the plan equal to the lesser of 2.5% of the total shares outstanding or 15,175,000 ordinary shares, which is known as the evergreen provision. A total of 75,633,351 ordinary shares were available for issuance under both plans as of December 31, 2009 and 2010. No new options were issued in the year ended December 31, 2010.
Stock-based compensation cost
The compensation cost charged as an expense was $728,135 (including discontinued operations of $5,887), $266,887 and $204,949 for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively, most of which was recorded in general and administrative expenses.
F-38
LINKTONE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)
Valuation assumptions
The Company calculated the fair value of each option grant on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The following are the assumptions used for each respective period (no new options were issued during the year ended December 31, 2010):
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Year ended December 31, | |
| | | | | | 2008 | | | 2009 | |
Risk-free interest rate (%) | | | (1 | ) | | | 2.61-3.48 | | | | 2.20-2.87 | |
Expected life (years) | | | (2 | ) | | | 3-6 | | | | 6 | |
Expected dividend yield (%) | | | | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Volatility (%) | | | (3 | ) | | | 50-60 | | | | 60-65 | |
| | |
(1) | | The risk-free interest rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury zero-coupon yield in effect at the time of grant. |
|
(2) | | In the absence of sufficient historical data in the exercise behavior of the option holders, the Company continued to use the simplified method, under which the expected term is based on the mid-point between the vesting date and the end of the contractual term. |
|
(3) | | The Company used its own historical data to estimate the stock price volatility. |
Award activity information
The following table summarizes the option activity under the Company’s stock option (shares) program for the periods presented:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Weighted | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | average | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | remaining | | | | |
| | Number of | | | Weighted-average | | | contractual term | | | Aggregate | |
Share options granted to employees | | shares | | | exercise price | | | (years) | | | intrinsic value | |
| | | | | | US$ | | | | | | | US$ | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding, December 31, 2009 | | | 10,438,800 | | | | 0.29 | | | | 7.83 | | | | 77,505 | |
Granted | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | | | | |
Exercised | | | (373,700 | ) | | | 0.10 | | | | | | | | | |
Forfeited | | | (388,200 | ) | | | 0.75 | | | | | | | | | |
Expired | | | (1,660,000 | ) | | | 0.15 | | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding, December 31, 2010 | | | 8,016,900 | | | | 0.30 | | | | 6.99 | | | | 48,780 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Vested and expected to vest as of December 31, 2010 | | | 8,016,900 | | | | 0.30 | | | | 6.99 | | | | 48,780 | |
Exercisable as of December 31, 2010 | | | 5,218,500 | | | | 0.37 | | | | 6.24 | | | | 45,962 | |
The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying awards and the fair value of the Company’s shares as of December 31, 2010 for those awards that have an exercise price currently below the fair value of the Company’s shares. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2008, 2009 and 2010 was $40,491, $14,604 and $18,237, respectively.
The weighted-average estimated fair value of options granted to employees of the Group during 2008 and 2009 was $0.11 and $0.10 per option, respectively. The total fair value of options vested during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 was $0.29, $0.34 and $0.12 per option, respectively.
F-39
LINKTONE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)
The following is additional information relating to options outstanding as of December 31, 2010:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Options outstanding as of December 31, 2010 | | | Options exercisable as of December 31, 2010 | |
| | | | | | Weighted | | | | | | | | | | | Weighted | | | | |
| | | | | | average | | | Weighted | | | | | | | average | | | Weighted | |
| | | | | | remaining | | | average | | | | | | | remaining | | | average | |
Range of | | Options | | | contractual life | | | exercise | | | Number | | | contractual life | | | exercise | |
exercise price | | outstanding | | | (years) | | | price ($) | | | exercisable | | | (years) | | | price ($) | |
$0.07~$0.10 | | | 572,400 | | | | 0.29 | | | | 0.08 | | | | 572,400 | | | | 0.29 | | | | 0.08 | |
$0.15~$0.29 | | | 6,170,000 | | | | 8.21 | | | | 0.19 | | | | 3,371,600 | | | | 8.06 | | | | 0.20 | |
$0.68~$0.78 | | | 644,500 | | | | 4.74 | | | | 0.72 | | | | 644,500 | | | | 4.74 | | | | 0.72 | |
$1.02~$1.40 | | | 630,000 | | | | 3.44 | | | | 1.16 | | | | 630,000 | | | | 3.44 | | | | 1.16 | |
| | | 8,016,900 | | | | 6.99 | | | | 0.30 | | | | 5,218,500 | | | | 6.24 | | | | 0.37 | |
As of December 31, 2010, there was $0.5 million of unrecognized share-based compensation cost related to share options issued to employees, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average vesting period of 2.28 years. To the extent the actual forfeiture rate is different from current estimates, actual share-based compensation related to these awards may be different from the expectation. The expected forfeiture rate of the stock options granted as of December 31, 2010 is nil.
26 Related party transactions
Due from (to) related parties include:
| | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2010 | |
| | $ | | | $ | |
Loan to GLD Investment Pte Ltd. (i) | | | 8,185,700 | | | | — | |
Amount due to MNC Sky Vision (ii) | | | | | | | | |
Loan to PT MNC Sky Vision | | | 1,901,700 | | | | — | |
Interest receivable | | | 24,778 | | | | — | |
Accounts receivable (iii, iv) | | | 700,000 | | | | 2,398,114 | |
| | | | | | |
Due from related parties | | | 10,812,178 | | | | 2,398,114 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | |
Contents fee payable to MNC and its subsidiaries (iv) | | | — | | | | (1,071,775 | ) |
Payable to other related parties | | | — | | | | (2,475 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Due to related parties | | | — | | | | (1,074,250 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| | |
(i) | | The loan of SGD 11.5 million as of December 31, 2009 was receivable from GLD. Pursuant to a loan agreement between the Company and GLD on October 10, 2008, the loan was to repaid 12 months from the date the loan was received by GLD. The loan bore interest at 4% per annum during the loan period of 12 months. Pursuant to the relevant loan agreement, GLD agreed to pledge a building in Singapore to Linktone as security during the loan period. On June 28, 2010, the loan was fully repaid by GLD. |
|
(ii) | | The loan of $1,901,700 as of December 31, 2009 is due from PT MNC Sky Vision (“Sky Vision”), a limited liability company incorporated in the Republic of Indonesia, a sister company of MNC. Pursuant to the relevant agreements signed between Linktone, Sky Vision and Humax Co., Ltd. (“Humax”), Sky Vision purchased equipment from Humax, a Korean-based manufacturer, for a total amount of $2,091,870. Humax assigned its receivable from Sky Vision of $2,091,870, made up of five payments in a period from June 8, 2009 to July 13, 2009, to Linktone at a discounted value of $1,901,700. Sky Vision repaid Linktone the principal of $1,901,700 one year from each payment date and interest shall be paid on a quarterly basis. Interest income receivable as of December 31, 2009 and 2010 was $24,778 and $17,660, respectively. |
F-40
LINKTONE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)
| | |
(iii) | | In July 2009, the Company entered into a technical assistance agreement with GTS Far East Ltd., a limited liability company incorporated in United Arab Emirates and an affiliate of MNC, for technical advisory services to be rendered to GTS Far East’s VAS operation in the Republic of Indonesia for a monthly fee of $100,000. The earned a total fee of $700,000 million for services rendered in 2009. |
|
(iv) | | In October 2009, PT Linktone entered into cooperation agreements with Infokom and MNC. Infokom is an Indonesia corporation and controlled by the same shareholder of MNC. Pursuant to these agreements, PT Linktone operated its VAS business in Indonesia through the VAS access numbers owned by Infokom and MNC. From September 1, 2010, the PT Linktone acquisition closing date, to December 31, 2010, PT Linktone’s total revenue generated from the VAS Short Codes owned by Infokom was $1,569,369. PT Linktone’s total revenue generated from the VAS access number owned by MNC was $260,239. As of December 31, 2010, amounts due from Infokom and MNC were $2,171,951 and $ 226,163, respectively. |
|
| | PT Linktone also purchases VAS contents from MNC and its subsidiaries for its operation. From September 1, 2010, the acquisition date, to December 31, 2010, PT Linktone purchased contents of $354,620 from MNC and its subsidiaries and the amounts due to these related-party content vendors, including payables assumed in the acquisition, was $1,071,775 as of December 31, 2010. |
|
(v) | | Short-term investments |
|
| | On December 20, 2010, the Group purchased secured notes issued by Aerospace Satellite Corporation Holding (“Aerospace Satellite”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Sky Vision, for consideration of $20,000,000. The secured notes are traded on Singapore Exchange Ltd., due November 16, 2015, bear interest at a rate of 12.75% per annum, and are payable semi-annually in arrears. The secured notes are guaranteed by Sky Vision. The fair value of the secured notes as of December 31, 2010 of $19,800,000 was based on the quoted market price on December 31, 2010. The corresponding interest of $318,750 has been recorded in interest income. |
27 Commitments and contingencies
(a) Operating lease commitments
The Group rents offices under operating lease agreements. As of December 31, 2010, the net aggregate minimum future lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases are as follows:
| | | | |
2011 | | | 518,111 | |
2012 | | | 123,103 | |
2013 | | | 82,283 | |
| | | |
Total | | | 723,497 | |
| | | |
As of December 31, 2010, the Group had no operating lease commitments beyond 2013.
For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, the Group incurred total office rental expense of $1,394,023 (including discontinued operations of $117,652), $893,398 and $760,982, respectively.
(c) Significant legal proceedings
On April 30, 2010, Yangzhou, as the plaintiff, filed two lawsuits against Unilink and Linktone Internet (See Note 8).
(d) Uncertainty in income taxes
The Company applies ASC 740-10 to account for uncertainty in income taxes. ASC 740-10 prescribes a more-likely-than-not threshold for financial statement recognition and measurement for tax positions taken or to be taken in a tax return. As of December 31, 2010, the Company has recorded an unrecognized tax benefit of $100,671, related interest of $129,693 and penalties of $40,274.
F-41
LINKTONE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)
28 Subsequent events
On March 31, 2011, the Group sold Aerospace Satellite secured notes with face value of $10 million in the open market and recognized a gain of $0.2 million, or 2% over the original price. Utilizing the proceeds from the sale and the interest earned, the Group acquired 116 million common shares through the open market at IDR 800 (or $0.092) per share in PT Global Mediacom Tbk (“Global Mediacom”), a controlling shareholder of MNC. Global Mediacom is an Indonesian corporation providing free-to-air and pay television services in Indonesia. The number of shares acquired by the Group represent less than one percent of total outstanding shares of Global Mediacom.
29 Additional information — Condensed financial statements of the Company
Relevant PRC laws and regulations permit PRC companies to pay dividends only out of their retained earnings after certain appropriations to statutory reserves, if any, as determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. As a result of these and other restrictions under PRC laws and regulations, the Company’s PRC subsidiaries and VIEs are restricted in their ability to transfer a portion of their net assets to the Company either in the form of cash, dividends, loans or advances. The restricted portion amounted to $45.4 million and $47.9 million, or 35% and 31%, of the Company’s total consolidated net assets as of December 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively. Even though the Company currently does not require any such dividends, loans or advances from its PRC subsidiaries and affiliates for working capital and other funding purposes, the Company may in the future require additional cash resources from our PRC subsidiaries and VIEs due to changes in business conditions, to fund future acquisitions and developments, or merely declare and pay dividends or distributions to the Company’s shareholders.
The condensed financial statements of the Company are presented below.
a) Condensed balance sheets
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | As of December 31, | |
| | Note | | | 2009 | | | 2010 | |
| | | | | $ | | | $ | |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | | | | | 29,530,267 | | | | 16,729,503 | |
Short-term investments | | | | | | | 3,862,377 | | | | 26,120,600 | |
Due from related parties | | | | | | | 10,087,400 | | | | — | |
Deposits and other current assets | | | | | | | 473,858 | | | | 273,986 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total current assets | | | | | | | 43,953,902 | | | | 43,124,089 | |
Investments in subsidiaries and VIEs | | | d | | | | 50,825,247 | | | | 74,948,558 | |
Due from subsidiaries and VIEs | | | | | | | 35,115,526 | | | | 14,038,501 | |
Other long-term assets | | | | | | | 364,276 | | | | 252,190 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | | | | | | 130,258,951 | | | | 132,363,338 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accrued liabilities and other payables | | | | | | | 236,848 | | | | 267,128 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total current liabilities | | | | | | | 236,848 | | | | 267,128 | |
Due to subsidiaries and VIEs | | | | | | | 1,131,082 | | | | 11,686 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | | | | | 1,367,930 | | | | 278,814 | |
Commitments and contingences | | | e | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shareholders’ equity | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ordinary shares ($0.0001 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized, 420,756,430 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2009 and 421,130,130 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2010) | | | | | | | 42,075 | | | | 42,113 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | | | | | 137,838,890 | | | | 137,581,956 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive income: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unrealized gain on investment in marketable securities | | | | | | | 437,250 | | | | 2,376,723 | |
Cumulative translation adjustments | | | | | | | 7,217,287 | | | | 9,306,938 | |
Accumulated losses | | | | | | | (16,644,481 | ) | | | (17,223,206 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total shareholders’ equity | | | | | | | 128,891,021 | | | | 132,084,524 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | | | | | | | 130,258,951 | | | | 132,363,338 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
F-42
LINKTONE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)
b) Condensed statements of operations and comprehensive income
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the year ended December 31, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2010 | |
| | $ | | | $ | | | $ | |
Net revenues | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Cost of revenue | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Gross profit | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Total operating expenses | | | (2,162,438 | ) | | | (1,260,418 | ) | | | (2,070,580 | ) |
Reversal of (provisions for) impairment | | | — | | | | 431,873 | | | | (1,139,810 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Loss from operations | | | (2,162,438 | ) | | | (828,545 | ) | | | (3,210,390 | ) |
Equity in profit (loss) of subsidiaries and VIEs, net | | | (14,537,136 | ) | | | 186,179 | | | | 2,315,416 | |
Other-than-temporary impairment loss on investments | | | (1,476,937 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
Other income and interest income, net | | | 1,678,711 | | | | 753,258 | | | | 316,249 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) before tax | | | (16,497,800 | ) | | | 110,892 | | | | (578,725 | ) |
Income tax expense | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | | (16,497,800 | ) | | | 110,892 | | | | (578,725 | ) |
Other comprehensive income (loss) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign currency translation adjustment | | | 2,646,071 | | | | (145,899 | ) | | | 2,089,651 | |
Unrealized gain on investments in marketable securities | | | — | | | | 437,250 | | | | 1,939,473 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income (loss) | | | (13,851,729 | ) | | | 402,243 | | | | 3,450,399 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
c) Condensed statements of cash flows
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the year ended December 31, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2010 | |
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities | | | 11,740 | | | | (1,286,268 | ) | | | (1,984,322 | ) |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (8,918,767 | ) | | | (36,621,700 | ) | | | (41,980,867 | ) |
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | | | 57,359,539 | | | | (438,160 | ) | | | 31,164,425 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | | | 48,452,512 | | | | (38,346,128 | ) | | | (12,800,764 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year | | | 19,423,883 | | | | 67,876,395 | | | | 29,530,267 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year | | | 67,876,395 | | | | 29,530,267 | | | | 16,729,503 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
F-43
LINKTONE LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)
d) Basis of presentation
The condensed financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, except for accounting of the Company’s subsidiaries and VIEs, and certain footnote disclosures as described below.
The Company is generally a holding company of certain subsidiaries and VIEs. The Company records its investments in its subsidiaries and VIEs under the equity method of accounting. Such investments are presented in the condensed balance sheets as “Investments in subsidiaries and VIEs” and 100% of the subsidiaries’ and VIEs’ profit or loss as “Equity in profit (loss) of subsidiaries and VIEs, net” in the condensed statements of operations and comprehensive income.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been condensed or omitted by reference to the consolidated financial statements.
e) Commitments, long term obligations and guarantees
The Company does not have any significant commitments, long-term obligations or guarantees as of any of the years presented, except for those disclosed in the consolidated financial statements (Note 27).
F-44