ORGANIZATION, OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | 9 Months Ended |
Mar. 31, 2015 |
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract] | |
ORGANIZATION, OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION, OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES: |
|
Energy Holdings International, Inc. (the “Company”), was incorporated in the State of Nevada on November 30, 2006 as a successor corporation to Green Energy Corp. which was incorporated in the State of Colorado on October 14, 2003. Green Energy Corp. acquired Green Energy Holding Corp. on December 18, 2006. |
|
On March 10, 2009, the Company amended the Articles of Incorporation to change its name from Green Energy Holding Corp. to Energy Holdings International, Inc. |
|
The Company is a holding company that also provides consulting services and is currently exploring various opportunities in the energy area. EHII’s management has been in active discussions with several potential companies, either to acquire, manage, or joint venture with these entities. However, as of the date of this filing, no definitive agreements or arrangements have been finalized. |
|
The Company has consolidated the accounts of EHII MENA, a firm in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, which is its wholly-owned subsidiary, into its financial statements. |
|
Basis of Presentation |
|
The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and do not include all of the information and disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. All adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations for the interim periods have been made and are of a recurring nature unless otherwise disclosed herein. The results of operations for such interim periods are not necessarily indicative of operations for a full year. |
|
All of the Company’s accounting policies are not included in this Form 10-Q. A more comprehensive set of accounting policies adopted by the Company are included on our Form 10-K as of June 30, 2014, filed on October 14, 2014 and are herein incorporated by reference. |
|
Fiscal Year |
|
The Company’s fiscal year is June 30. |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less as cash equivalents. There are no cash equivalents at March 31, 2015 and June 30, 2014. We had cash balances at March 31, 2015 and June 30, 2014 of $162 and $190,528, respectively. |
|
Property and Equipment |
|
Property and equipment are recorded at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over each item's estimated useful life, which is three years for vehicles, computers and other items. Our fixed assets consist generally of office furniture, which is being depreciated over its useful life, generally five years, and equipment, which is being depreciated over their useful lived, which is generally seven years. |
|
Revenue Recognition |
|
Revenue is comprised principally of service and consulting revenue from work performed for customers under master service arrangements. Revenue is recognized over the period of the agreement as it is earned as such policy complies with the following criteria: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (ii) the services have been provided; (iii) the fee is fixed and determinable, (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. In the event that a customer pays up front, deferred revenue is recognized for the amount of the payment in excess of the revenue earned. |
|
Use of Estimates |
|
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
|
Income Tax |
|
The Company accounts for income taxes under current Accounting Standards Codification 740, (“ASC 740”) where deferred taxes are provided on a liability method and deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss carryforwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment. Since the company considers it more likely than not that no benefit from net operating loss carry forwards will be recognized in the future, deferred tax assets are fully offset by a valuation allowance. |
|
Net Income (Loss) per Share |
|
The net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common outstanding. Warrants, stock options, and common stock issuable upon the conversion of the Company's preferred stock (if any), are not included in the computation if the effect would be anti-dilutive and would increase the earnings or decrease loss per share. |
|
Financial Instruments |
|
Current accounting guidance establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows: |
|
| • | Level 1. Observable inputs such as quoted market prices in active markets. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| • | Level 2. Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly, and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| • | Level 3. Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
The following table shows our financial instruments using the three-tier fair value hierarchy: |
|
| | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 |
Description | | 3/31/15 | | 6/30/14 | | 3/31/15 | | 6/30/14 | | 3/31/15 | | 6/30/14 |
Derivatives (recurring) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 219,969 | | | $ | 26,541 | |
|
At June 30, 2014, the Company had derivative liabilities as a result of a convertible promissory issued on April 4, 2014 that includes embedded derivatives. During the quarter ended December 31, 2014, the April 1, 2014 convertible promissory note was fully converted into 5,126,437 shares of common stock. Also during the nine months ended March 31, 2015, we issued three additional convertible promissory notes, one on November 17, 2014, one on December 15, 2015 and another on February 20, 2015. |
|
We valued these liabilities using level 3 valuation techniques. |
|
The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and short-term debt. The estimated fair value of cash, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their carrying amounts due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The carrying value of short-term debt also approximates fair value since their terms are similar to those in the lending market for comparable loans with comparable risks. |
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
|
In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-12, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period. The new guidance requires that share-based compensation that require a specific performance target to be achieved in order for employees to become eligible to vest in the awards and that could be achieved after an employee completes the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation costs should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. If the performance target becomes probable of being achieved before the end of the requisite service period, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost should be recognized prospectively over the remaining requisite service period. The total amount of compensation cost recognized during and after the requisite service period should reflect the number of awards that are expected to vest and should be adjusted to reflect those awards that ultimately vest. The requisite service period ends when the employee can cease rendering service and still be eligible to vest in the award if the performance target is achieved. This new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. Entities may apply the amendments in this Update either (a) prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or (b) retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. The adoption of ASU 2014-12 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. |
|
In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-10: Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation , to improve financial reporting by reducing the cost and complexity associated with the incremental reporting requirements of development stage entities. The amendments in this update remove all incremental financial reporting requirements from U.S. GAAP for development stage entities, thereby improving financial reporting by eliminating the cost and complexity associated with providing that information. The amendments in this Update also eliminate an exception provided to development stage entities in Topic 810, Consolidation, for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity on the basis of the amount of investment equity that is at risk. The amendments to eliminate that exception simplify U.S. GAAP by reducing avoidable complexity in existing accounting literature and improve the relevance of information provided to financial statement users by requiring the application of the same consolidation guidance by all reporting entities. The elimination of the exception may change the consolidation analysis, consolidation decision, and disclosure requirements for a reporting entity that has an interest in an entity in the development stage. The amendments related to the elimination of inception-to-date information and the other remaining disclosure requirements of Topic 915 should be applied retrospectively except for the clarification to Topic 275, which shall be applied prospectively. For public companies, those amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted. The early adoption of ASU 2014-10 removed the development stage entity financial reporting requirements from the Company. |
|
The Company has reviewed other recent accounting pronouncements and does not anticipate any impact on financial results as a result of recently issued standards. |