Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012
Commission File Number: 001-32330
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
| | |
Maryland (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) | | 11-3707493 (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
399 Park Avenue, 18th Floor New York, NY 10022 (Address of Principal Executive Offices, Including Zip Code) |
(212) 547-2600 (Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code) |
Indicate by the check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
| | | | | | |
Large accelerated filer o | | Accelerated filer ý | | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:
The Company has one class of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, 134,837,497 shares outstanding as of November 7, 2012.
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP.
FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| | | | | | |
Index | |
| | Page | |
---|
Part I. | | Financial Information | | | 5 | |
Item 1. | | Financial Statements | | | 5 | |
| | Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2012 (unaudited) and December 31, 2011 | | | 5 | |
| | Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 | | | 6 | |
| | Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) (unaudited) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 | | | 7 | |
| | Consolidated Statements of Equity as of September 30, 2012 (unaudited) and December 31, 2011 | | | 8 | |
| | Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 | | | 9 | |
| | Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) | | | 10 | |
Item 2. | | Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | | | 65 | |
Item 3. | | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | | | 98 | |
Item 4. | | Controls and Procedures | | | 101 | |
Part II. | | Other Information | | | 101 | |
Item 1. | | Legal Proceedings | | | 101 | |
Item 6. | | Exhibits | | | 102 | |
Signatures | | | 107 | |
2
Table of Contents
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements are generally identifiable by use of forward-looking terminology such as "may," "will," "should," "potential," "intend," "expect," "seek," "anticipate," "estimate," "believe," "could," "project," "predict," "continue," "future" or other similar words or expressions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance and are based on certain assumptions, discuss future expectations, describe plans and strategies, contain projections of results of operations or of financial condition or state other forward-looking information. Such statements include, but are not limited to, those relating to the operating performance of our investments, our financing needs, the effects of our current strategies, loan and securities activities, our ability to manage our collateralized debt obligations, or CDOs, and our ability to raise capital. Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of plans or strategies is inherently uncertain, particularly given the economic environment. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, our actual results and performance could differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements and you should not unduly rely on these statements. These forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results in future periods to differ materially from those forward looking statements. These factors include, but are not limited to:
- •
- adverse economic conditions and the impact on the commercial real estate finance industry;
- •
- access to debt and equity capital and our liquidity;
- •
- our use of leverage;
- •
- our ability to meet various coverage tests with respect to our CDOs;
- •
- our ability to obtain mortgage financing on our net lease properties;
- •
- the affect of economic conditions on the valuations of our investments;
- •
- our ability to source and close on attractive investment opportunities;
- •
- the impact of economic conditions on the borrowers of the commercial real estate debt we originate and the commercial mortgage loans underlying the commercial mortgage backed securities in which we invest;
- •
- our ability to realize the value of the bonds we have purchased and retained in our CDO financing transactions and other securitization transactions and our ability to complete securitization transactions on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all, including the transaction that was priced on October 26, 2012;
- •
- any failure in our due diligence to identify all relevant facts in our underwriting process or otherwise;
- •
- credit rating downgrades;
- •
- tenant/operator or borrower defaults or bankruptcy;
- •
- illiquidity of properties in our portfolio;
- •
- environmental compliance costs and liabilities;
- •
- effect of regulatory actions, litigation and contractual claims against us and our affiliates, including the potential settlement and litigation of such claims;
3
Table of Contents
- •
- competition for investment opportunities;
- •
- regulatory requirements with respect to our business and the related cost of compliance;
- •
- the impact of any conflicts arising from our asset management business;
- •
- the ability to raise capital for the non-traded real estate investment trusts, or REITs, we sponsor;
- •
- changes in laws or regulations governing various aspects of our business;
- •
- the loss of our exemption from the definition of "investment company" under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended;
- •
- competition for qualified personnel and our ability to retain key personnel;
- •
- the effectiveness of our risk management systems;
- •
- failure to maintain effective internal controls;
- •
- compliance with the rules governing REITs; and
- •
- performance of our investments relative to our expectations and the impact on our actual return on invested equity.
The foregoing list of factors is not exhaustive. All forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are based upon information available to us on the date hereof and we are under no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this report to conform these statements to actual results.
Factors that could have a material adverse effect on our operations and future prospects are set forth in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011. The factors set forth in the Risk Factors section could cause our actual results to differ significantly from those contained in any forward-looking statement contained in this report.
4
Table of Contents
PART I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in Thousands)
| | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2012 (Unaudited) | | December 31, 2011 | |
---|
Assets | | | | | | | |
VIE Financing Structures | | | | | | | |
Restricted cash | | $ | 243,731 | | $ | 261,295 | |
Operating real estate, net | | | 340,164 | | | 313,227 | |
Real estate securities, available for sale | | | 1,125,875 | | | 1,358,282 | |
Real estate debt investments, net | | | 1,513,131 | | | 1,631,856 | |
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated ventures | | | 62,831 | | | 62,938 | |
Receivables, net of allowance of $1,158 in 2012 and $1,179 in 2011 | | | 18,575 | | | 22,530 | |
Derivative assets, at fair value | | | — | | | 61 | |
Deferred costs and intangible assets, net | | | 40,120 | | | 47,499 | |
Assets of properties held for sale | | | 1,595 | | | 3,198 | |
Other assets | | | 14,063 | | | 20,549 | |
| | | | | |
| | | 3,360,085 | | | 3,721,435 | |
| | | | | |
Non-VIE Financing Structures | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | 252,427 | | | 144,508 | |
Restricted cash | | | 24,996 | | | 37,069 | |
Operating real estate, net | | | 768,129 | | | 776,222 | |
Real estate securities, available for sale | | | 128,065 | | | 115,023 | |
Real estate debt investments, net | | | 316,917 | | | 78,726 | |
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated ventures | | | 51,239 | | | 33,205 | |
Receivables | | | 15,808 | | | 8,958 | |
Receivables, related parties | | | 8,561 | | | 5,979 | |
Unbilled rent receivable | | | 13,459 | | | 11,891 | |
Derivative assets, at fair value | | | 9,425 | | | 5,674 | |
Deferred costs and intangible assets, net | | | 48,095 | | | 50,885 | |
Other assets | | | 14,554 | | | 16,862 | |
| | | | | |
| | | 1,651,675 | | | 1,285,002 | |
| | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 5,011,760 | | $ | 5,006,437 | |
| | | | | |
Liabilities | | | | | | | |
VIE Financing Structures | | | | | | | |
CDO bonds payable (see Note 9) | | $ | 2,104,782 | | $ | 2,273,907 | |
Mortgage notes payable | | | 228,446 | | | 228,525 | |
Secured term loan | | | 14,682 | | | 14,682 | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | | 15,123 | | | 15,754 | |
Escrow deposits payable | | | 75,917 | | | 52,660 | |
Derivative liabilities, at fair value | | | 188,412 | | | 226,481 | |
Other liabilities | | | 25,540 | | | 55,007 | |
| | | | | |
| | | 2,652,902 | | | 2,867,016 | |
| | | | | |
Non-VIE Financing Structures | | | | | | | |
Mortgage notes payable | | | 552,661 | | | 554,732 | |
Credit facilities | | | 150,146 | | | 64,259 | |
Exchangeable senior notes | | | 290,256 | | | 215,853 | |
Junior subordinated notes, at fair value | | | 182,100 | | | 157,168 | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | | 46,375 | | | 50,868 | |
Escrow deposits payable | | | 14,973 | | | 196 | |
Derivative liabilities, at fair value | | | — | | | 8,193 | |
Other liabilities | | | 53,693 | | | 48,538 | |
| | | | | |
| | | 1,290,204 | | | 1,099,807 | |
| | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 3,943,106 | | | 3,966,823 | |
| | | | | |
Commitments and contingencies (see Note 15) | | | | | | | |
Equity | | | | | | | |
NorthStar Realty Finance Corp. Stockholders' Equity | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock, 8.75% Series A, $0.01 par value, $61,675 and $60,000 liquidation preference as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively | | | 59,453 | | | 57,867 | |
Preferred stock, 8.25% Series B, $0.01 par value, $349,975 and $190,000 liquidation preference as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively | | | 323,769 | | | 183,505 | |
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized, 134,837,497 and 96,044,383 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively | | | 1,348 | | | 960 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 1,018,610 | | | 809,826 | |
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) | | | (326,183 | ) | | (8,626 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | | | (24,563 | ) | | (36,160 | ) |
| | | | | |
Total NorthStar Realty Finance Corp. stockholders' equity | | | 1,052,434 | | | 1,007,372 | |
Non-controlling interests | | | 16,220 | | | 32,242 | |
| | | | | |
Total equity | | | 1,068,654 | | | 1,039,614 | |
| | | | | |
Total liabilities and equity | | $ | 5,011,760 | | $ | 5,006,437 | |
| | | | | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share and Dividends Declared Data)
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
---|
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 | |
---|
Net interest income | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest income | | $ | 82,558 | | $ | 100,682 | | $ | 243,367 | | $ | 310,484 | |
Interest expense on debt and securities | | | 12,304 | | | 10,715 | | | 38,569 | | | 32,244 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net interest income on debt and securities | | | 70,254 | | | 89,967 | | | 204,798 | | | 278,240 | |
Other revenues | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rental and escalation income | | | 29,960 | | | 26,996 | | | 87,619 | | | 85,879 | |
Commission income | | | 12,213 | | | 3,131 | | | 28,291 | | | 5,775 | |
Advisory and other fees | | | 1,507 | | | 130 | | | 4,766 | | | 425 | |
Other revenue | | | 366 | | | 86 | | | 1,996 | | | 329 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total other revenues | | | 44,046 | | | 30,343 | | | 122,672 | | | 92,408 | |
Expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other interest expense | | | 23,618 | | | 29,160 | | | 67,316 | | | 75,257 | |
Real estate properties—operating expenses | | | 5,145 | | | 3,539 | | | 14,834 | | | 18,649 | |
Asset management expenses | | | 751 | | | 1,302 | | | 2,552 | | | 4,531 | |
Commission expense | | | 11,070 | | | 2,698 | | | 25,538 | | | 5,117 | |
Other costs, net | | | — | | | — | | | 392 | | | — | |
Provision for loan losses | | | 6,360 | | | 9,340 | | | 19,737 | | | 48,040 | |
Provision for loss on equity investment | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 4,482 | |
General and administrative | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Salaries and equity-based compensation(1) | | | 13,691 | | | 11,386 | | | 41,764 | | | 43,252 | |
Other general and administrative | | | 6,170 | | | 7,426 | | | 18,671 | | | 21,148 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total general and administrative | | | 19,861 | | | 18,812 | | | 60,435 | | | 64,400 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 11,735 | | | 12,762 | | | 36,718 | | | 32,370 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total expenses | | | 78,540 | | | 77,613 | | | 227,522 | | | 252,846 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from operations | | | 35,760 | | | 42,697 | | | 99,948 | | | 117,802 | |
Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated ventures | | | 421 | | | (604 | ) | | (416 | ) | | (4,387 | ) |
Other income (loss) | | | — | | | (11,826 | ) | | 20,258 | | | (1,688 | ) |
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments and other | | | (202,019 | ) | | (68,446 | ) | | (413,073 | ) | | (351,271 | ) |
Realized gain (loss) on investments and other | | | 15,221 | | | 14,364 | | | 35,768 | | | 61,937 | |
Gain from acquisitions | | | — | | | 81 | | | — | | | 81 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations | | | (150,617 | ) | | (23,734 | ) | | (257,515 | ) | | (177,526 | ) |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | | | (23 | ) | | (16 | ) | | (88 | ) | | (654 | ) |
Gain (loss) on sale from discontinued operations | | | 29 | | | 2,881 | | | 314 | | | 17,328 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | | (150,611 | ) | | (20,869 | ) | | (257,289 | ) | | (160,852 | ) |
Less: net (income) loss allocated to non-controlling interests | | | 7,704 | | | 1,743 | | | 13,911 | | | 1,393 | |
Preferred stock dividends | | | (6,671 | ) | | (5,231 | ) | | (17,629 | ) | | (15,694 | ) |
Contingently redeemable non-controlling interest accretion | | | — | | | (196 | ) | | — | | | (5,178 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) attributable to NorthStar Realty Finance Corp. common stockholders | | $ | (149,578 | ) | $ | (24,553 | ) | $ | (261,007 | ) | $ | (180,331 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) per share from continuing operations (basic/diluted) | | $ | (1.11 | ) | $ | (0.29 | ) | $ | (2.17 | ) | $ | (2.26 | ) |
Income (loss) per share from discontinued operations (basic/diluted) | | | — | | | (0.01 | ) | | — | | | (0.01 | ) |
Gain per share on sale of discontinued operations (basic/diluted) | | | — | | | 0.04 | | | — | | | 0.21 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) per common share attributable to NorthStar Realty Finance Corp. common stockholders (basic/diluted) | | $ | (1.11 | ) | $ | (0.26 | ) | $ | (2.17 | ) | $ | (2.06 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average number of shares of common stock: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | 134,272,289 | | | 95,957,333 | | | 120,491,186 | | | 87,105,058 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Diluted | | | 140,609,372 | | | 100,229,735 | | | 126,445,659 | | | 91,397,552 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Dividends declared per share of common stock | | $ | 0.17 | | $ | 0.125 | | $ | 0.48 | | $ | 0.325 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
- (1)
- The three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 include $2.9 million and $2.2 million, respectively, of equity-based compensation expense. The nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 include $10.0 million and $6.9 million, respectively, of equity-based compensation expense.
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(Dollars in Thousands)
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
---|
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 | |
---|
Net income (loss) | | $ | (150,611 | ) | $ | (20,869 | ) | $ | (257,289 | ) | $ | (160,852 | ) |
Other comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unrealized gain (loss) on real estate securities, available for sale | | | (101 | ) | | (5,845 | ) | | 6,589 | | | (5,845 | ) |
Reclassification of (gain) loss into earnings | | | 1,845 | | | 1,873 | | | 5,591 | | | 5,618 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total other comprehensive income (loss) | | | 1,744 | | | (3,972 | ) | | 12,180 | | | (227 | ) |
Comprehensive income (loss) | | | (148,867 | ) | | (24,841 | ) | | (245,109 | ) | | (161,079 | ) |
Less: Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests | | | 7,625 | | | 1,912 | | | 13,328 | | | 1,377 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to NorthStar Realty Finance Corp. | | $ | (141,242 | ) | $ | (22,929 | ) | $ | (231,781 | ) | $ | (159,702 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
7
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
(Dollars and Shares in Thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Preferred Stock | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Series A | | Series B | | Common Stock | |
| | Retained Earnings (Accumulated Deficit) | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | | Total NorthStar Stockholders' Equity | |
| |
| |
---|
| | Additional Paid-in Capital | | Non-controlling Interests | | Total Equity | |
---|
| | Shares | | Amount | | Shares | | Amount | | Shares | | Amount | |
---|
Balance at December 31, 2010 | | | 2,400 | | $ | 57,867 | | | 7,600 | | $ | 183,505 | | | 78,105 | | $ | 781 | | $ | 723,102 | | $ | 293,382 | | $ | (36,119 | ) | $ | 1,222,518 | | $ | 55,173 | | $ | 1,277,691 | |
Net proceeds from offering of common stock | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 17,250 | | | 173 | | | 69,132 | | | — | | | — | | | 69,305 | | | — | | | 69,305 | |
Reclassification of equity compensation to liability | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (2,136 | ) | | (2,136 | ) |
Non-controlling interest contribution to joint venture | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 144 | | | 144 | |
Non-controlling interest distributions | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (13,202 | ) | | (13,202 | ) |
Dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plan | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 62 | | | — | | | 264 | | | — | | | — | | | 264 | | | — | | | 264 | |
Amortization of equity-based compensation | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 17 | | | — | | | — | | | 17 | | | 11,665 | | | 11,682 | |
Contingently redeemable non-controlling interest accretion | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (5,178 | ) | | — | | | (5,178 | ) | | — | | | (5,178 | ) |
Equity component of exchangeable notes | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 10,971 | | | — | | | — | | | 10,971 | | | — | | | 10,971 | |
Other comprehensive income (loss) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (41 | ) | | (41 | ) | | 26 | | | (15 | ) |
Conversion of LTIP units | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 628 | | | 6 | | | 6,340 | | | — | | | — | | | 6,346 | | | (6,346 | ) | | — | |
Dividends on common stock and LTIP Units | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (38,994 | ) | | — | | | (38,994 | ) | | (1,809 | ) | | (40,803 | ) |
Dividends on preferred stock | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (20,925 | ) | | — | | | (20,925 | ) | | — | | | (20,925 | ) |
Net income (loss) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (236,911 | ) | | — | | | (236,911 | ) | | (11,273 | ) | | (248,184 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2011 | | | 2,400 | | $ | 57,867 | | | 7,600 | | $ | 183,505 | | | 96,045 | | $ | 960 | | $ | 809,826 | | $ | (8,626 | ) | $ | (36,160 | ) | $ | 1,007,372 | | $ | 32,242 | | $ | 1,039,614 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net proceeds from offering of common stock | | | — | | $ | — | | | — | | $ | — | | | 38,500 | | $ | 384 | | $ | 205,524 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 205,908 | | $ | — | | $ | 205,908 | |
Net proceeds from offering of preferred stock | | | 67 | | | 1,586 | | | 6,399 | | | 140,264 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 141,850 | | | — | | | 141,850 | |
Redemptions of non-controlling interests | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (2,358 | ) | | — | | | — | | | (2,358 | ) | | 2,358 | | | — | |
Non-controlling interest distributions | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (7,051 | ) | | (7,051 | ) |
Dividend reinvestment plan | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 27 | | | 1 | | | 147 | | | — | | | — | | | 148 | | | — | | | 148 | |
Amortization of equity-based compensation | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 10,049 | | | 10,049 | |
Equity component of exchangeable notes | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 2,179 | | | — | | | — | | | 2,179 | | | — | | | 2,179 | |
Other comprehensive income (loss) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 11,597 | | | 11,597 | | | 583 | | | 12,180 | |
Conversion of LTIP units | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 265 | | | 3 | | | 3,292 | | | — | | | — | | | 3,295 | | | (3,295 | ) | | — | |
Dividends on common stock, LTIP Units and RSUs | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (56,550 | ) | | — | | | (56,550 | ) | | (4,755 | ) | | (61,305 | ) |
Dividends on preferred stock | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (17,629 | ) | | — | | | (17,629 | ) | | — | | | (17,629 | ) |
Net income (loss) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (243,378 | ) | | — | | | (243,378 | ) | | (13,911 | ) | | (257,289 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at September 30, 2012 (unaudited) | | | 2,467 | | $ | 59,453 | | | 13,999 | | $ | 323,769 | | | 134,837 | | $ | 1,348 | | $ | 1,018,610 | | $ | (326,183 | ) | $ | (24,563 | ) | $ | 1,052,434 | | $ | 16,220 | | $ | 1,068,654 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
8
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in Thousands)
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | |
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
---|
| | 2012 | | 2011 | |
---|
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (257,289 | ) | $ | (160,852 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | | | | | | | |
Equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated ventures | | | 416 | | | 4,387 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 36,718 | | | 33,162 | |
Amortization of premium/discount on investments | | | (57,860 | ) | | (112,026 | ) |
Interest accretion on investments | | | (1,182 | ) | | (7,904 | ) |
Amortization of deferred financing costs | | | 2,196 | | | 4,153 | |
Equity-based compensation | | | 10,049 | | | 6,851 | |
Unrealized (gain) loss on investments and other | | | 351,914 | | | 271,741 | |
Realized gain (loss) on investments and other / other income | | | (36,026 | ) | | (61,937 | ) |
Gain on sale from of discontinued operations / gain from acquisitions | | | (314 | ) | | (17,409 | ) |
Reversal of accrued loss and other costs | | | (22,041 | ) | | — | |
Distributions from unconsolidated ventures | | | 1,420 | | | 513 | |
Amortization of capitalized above/below market leases | | | (948 | ) | | (656 | ) |
Unbilled rent receivable | | | (2,220 | ) | | (1,845 | ) |
Provision for loss on equity investment | | | — | | | 4,482 | |
Provision for loan losses | | | 19,737 | | | 48,040 | |
Allowance for uncollectable accounts | | | 301 | | | 182 | |
Discount and loan fees received | | | 16,632 | | | 4,038 | |
Loan acquisition costs | | | (816 | ) | | — | |
Changes in assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | |
Restricted cash | | | (8,344 | ) | | (7,001 | ) |
Receivables | | | (1,775 | ) | | (531 | ) |
Other assets | | | 8,509 | | | 15,206 | |
Receivables, related parties | | | (2,502 | ) | | (4,634 | ) |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | | (8,055 | ) | | (117 | ) |
Other liabilities | | | 16,658 | | | 21,253 | |
| | | | | |
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | | | 65,178 | | | 39,096 | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | | | |
Acquisitions of operating real estate, net | | | (6,858 | ) | | — | |
Improvements of operating real estate | | | (3,050 | ) | | (2,929 | ) |
Deferred costs and intangible assets | | | (799 | ) | | (2,477 | ) |
Net proceeds from disposition of operating real estate | | | 8,542 | | | 121,860 | |
Acquisitions of real estate securities, available for sale | | | (89,041 | ) | | (239,787 | ) |
Proceeds from sales of real estate securities, available for sale | | | 258,748 | | | 256,304 | |
Repayments on real estate securities, available for sale | | | 162,364 | | | 90,121 | |
Originations/acquisitions of real estate debt investments | | | (306,258 | ) | | (235,880 | ) |
Repayments on real estate debt investments | | | 135,941 | | | 268,792 | |
Proceeds from sales of real estate debt investments | | | 17,072 | | | 108,356 | |
Change in restricted cash | | | (5,277 | ) | | (1,754 | ) |
Purchase of equity interest | | | — | | | (10,715 | ) |
Other receivables | | | 17,349 | | | 924 | |
Investment in and advances to unconsolidated ventures | | | (20,294 | ) | | (1,935 | ) |
Distributions from unconsolidated ventures | | | 450 | | | 835 | |
| | | | | |
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | | | 168,889 | | | 351,715 | |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | | | |
Purchase of derivative instruments | | | (8,920 | ) | | (8,500 | ) |
Settlement of derivative instruments | | | (11,175 | ) | | (27,097 | ) |
Collateral held by derivative counterparties | | | — | | | 23,280 | |
Borrowings from mortgage notes | | | 4,500 | | | 20,920 | |
Repayments of mortgage notes | | | (6,650 | ) | | (219,877 | ) |
Borrowings under credit facilities | | | 119,775 | | | — | |
Repayments of credit facilities | | | (33,888 | ) | | — | |
Proceeds from CDO bonds reissuance | | | 10,360 | | | — | |
Proceeds from CDO bonds | | | 10,000 | | | 56,744 | |
Repayments of CDO bonds | | | (532,403 | ) | | (222,254 | ) |
Repurchases of CDO bonds | | | (72,356 | ) | | (74,745 | ) |
Repayments of secured term loans | | | — | | | (22,199 | ) |
Payment of deferred financing costs | | | (3,727 | ) | | (9,973 | ) |
Change in restricted cash | | | 59,996 | | | 54,244 | |
Proceeds from exchangeable senior notes | | | 82,000 | | | 172,500 | |
Repurchases and repayment of exchangeable senior notes | | | (7,500 | ) | | (50,787 | ) |
Net proceeds from preferred stock offering | | | 141,850 | | | — | |
Net proceeds from common stock offering | | | 205,908 | | | 69,305 | |
Proceeds from dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plan | | | 148 | | | 204 | |
Dividends (common and preferred) | | | (74,179 | ) | | (42,686 | ) |
Distributions / repayments to non-controlling interests | | | (9,887 | ) | | (119,508 | ) |
| | | | | |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | | (126,148 | ) | | (400,429 | ) |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | | 107,919 | | | (9,618 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents—beginning of period | | | 144,508 | | | 125,439 | |
| | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents—end of period | | $ | 252,427 | | $ | 115,821 | |
| | | | | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
9
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. Formation and Organization
NorthStar Realty Finance Corp. is a diversified commercial real estate ("CRE") investment and asset management company (the "Company"). The Company is a Maryland corporation and is an internally-managed real estate investment trust ("REIT") formed in October 2003. Substantially all of the Company's assets, directly or indirectly, are held by, and the Company conducts its operations, directly or indirectly, through NorthStar Realty Finance Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership and the operating partnership of the Company (the "Operating Partnership").
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Quarterly Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated interim financial statements and related notes of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("U.S. GAAP") for interim financial reporting and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, certain information and note disclosures normally included in the consolidated financial statements prepared under U.S. GAAP have been condensed or omitted. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of the Company's financial position, results of operations and cash flows have been included and are of a normal and recurring nature. The operating results presented for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the entire year. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company's consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC").
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, and its subsidiaries, which are majority-owned and controlled by the Company or a variable interest entity ("VIE") where the Company is the primary beneficiary. All significant intercompany balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
A VIE is defined as an entity in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. The determination of whether an entity is a VIE includes both a qualitative and quantitative analysis. The Company bases its qualitative analysis on its review of the design of the entity, its organizational structure including decision-making ability and relevant financial agreements and its quantitative analysis on the forecasted cash flows of the entity. The Company reassesses its initial evaluation of an entity as a VIE upon the occurrence of certain reconsideration events.
A VIE must be consolidated only by its primary beneficiary, which is defined as the party who, along with its affiliates and agents, has a potentially significant interest in the entity and controls such entity's significant decisions. The Company determines whether it is the primary beneficiary of a VIE by considering qualitative and quantitative factors, including, but not limited to: which activities most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance and which party controls such activities; the
10
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
amount and characteristics of its investment; the obligation or likelihood for the Company or other interests to provide financial support; consideration of the VIE's purpose and design, including the risks the VIE was designed to create and passthrough to its variable interest holders and the similarity with and significance to the business activities of the Company and the other interests. The Company reassesses its determination of whether it is the primary beneficiary of a VIE each reporting period. Significant judgments related to these determinations include estimates about the current and future fair value and performance of investments held by these VIEs and general market conditions.
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that could affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates and assumptions.
Reclassifications
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified in the consolidated financial statements to conform to the current period presentation.
Comprehensive Income
The Company reports consolidated comprehensive income in separate statements following its consolidated statements of operations. Comprehensive income is defined as the change in equity resulting from net income (loss) and other comprehensive income (loss) ("OCI"). The Company's components of OCI principally include: (i) unrealized gain (loss) of securities available for sale for which the fair value option is not elected; and (ii) the reclassification of unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments that are or were deemed to be effective hedges.
Fair Value Option
The fair value option provides an election that allows companies to irrevocably elect fair value for certain financial assets and liabilities on an instrument-by-instrument basis at initial recognition. Changes in fair value for assets and liabilities for which the election is made will be recognized in earnings as they occur.
Real Estate Debt Investments
CRE debt investments are generally intended to be held to maturity and, accordingly, are carried at cost, net of unamortized loan origination fees, discounts and unfunded commitments. CRE debt investments that are deemed to be impaired are carried at amortized cost less a loan loss reserve, if deemed appropriate, and represents fair value.
Real Estate Securities
The Company classifies its CRE securities as available for sale on the acquisition date. Available for sale securities are recorded at fair value. The Company has generally elected to apply the fair value option of accounting for its CRE securities portfolio. For those CRE securities for which the fair value
11
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
option of accounting was elected, any unrealized gains (losses) from changes in fair value are recorded in unrealized gains (losses) on investments and other in the Company's consolidated statements of operations.
The Company may decide to not elect the fair value option for certain CRE securities due to the nature of the particular instrument. For those CRE securities for which the fair value option of accounting was not elected, any unrealized gains (losses) from the change in fair value is reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the Company's consolidated statements of equity, to the extent impairment losses are considered temporary.
Operating Real Estate
Operating real estate is carried at historical cost less accumulated depreciation. The Company follows the purchase method of accounting for acquisitions of operating real estate held for investment, where the purchase price of operating real estate is allocated to tangible assets such as land, building, tenant improvements and other identified intangibles. The Company evaluates whether real estate acquired in connection with a foreclosure, UCC/deed in lieu of foreclosure or a consentual modification of a loan (herein collectively referred to as taking title to a property) ("REO") constitutes a business and whether business combination accounting is appropriate. Any excess upon taking title to a property between the carrying value of a loan over the estimated fair value of the property is charged to provision for loan losses.
Operating real estate, including REO, which has met the criteria to be classified as held for sale, is separately presented in the consolidated balance sheets. Such operating real estate is reported at the lower of its carrying value or its estimated fair value less the cost to sell. Once a property is determined to be held for sale, depreciation is no longer recorded. In addition, the results of operations are reclassified to income (loss) from discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations. Other REO for which the Company intends to market for sale in the near term is recorded at estimated fair value.
Revenue Recognition
Real Estate Debt Investments
Interest income is recognized on an accrual basis and any related discount, premium, origination costs and fees are amortized over the life of the investment using the effective interest method. The amortization is reflected as an adjustment to interest income in the consolidated statements of operations. The accretion of discount or amortization of a premium is discontinued if such loan is reclassified to held for sale.
Loans acquired at a discount with deteriorated credit quality are accreted to expected recovery. The Company continues to estimate the amount of recovery over the life of such loans. A subsequent increase in expected future cash flows is recognized as an adjustment to the accretable yield prospectively over the remaining life of such loan.
12
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Real Estate Securities
Interest income is recognized using the effective interest method with any purchased premium or discount accreted through earnings based upon expected cash flows through the expected maturity date of the security. Changes to expected cash flows may result in a change to the yield which is then used prospectively to recognize interest income.
Operating Real Estate
Rental and escalation income from operating real estate is derived from leasing of space to various types of corporate tenants and healthcare operators. The leases are for fixed terms of varying length and generally provide for annual rentals and expense reimbursements to be paid in monthly installments. Rental income from leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the respective leases. Escalation income represents revenue from tenant leases which provide for the recovery of all or a portion of the operating expenses and real estate taxes paid by the Company on behalf of the respective property. This revenue is accrued in the same periods as the expenses are incurred.
Commission Income
Commission income represents income earned from selling equity in NorthStar Real Estate Income Trust, Inc. ("NorthStar Income") through the Company's broker-dealer subsidiary. Commission income is accrued on a trade date basis.
Advisory and Other Fees
Advisory and other fees include fees earned from the management of the Company's non-traded REITs and are recognized in the periods during which the related services are performed and the amounts have been contractually earned.
Credit Losses and Impairment on Investments
Real Estate Debt Investments
Loans are considered impaired when based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will not be able to collect principal and interest amounts due according to the contractual terms. The Company assesses the credit quality of the portfolio and adequacy of loan loss reserves on a quarterly basis, or more frequently as necessary. Significant judgment of the Company is required in this analysis. The Company considers the estimated net recoverable value of the loan as well as other factors, including but not limited to the fair value of any collateral, the amount and the status of any senior debt, the quality and financial condition of the borrower and the competitive situation of the area where the underlying collateral is located. Because this determination is based upon projections of future economic events, which are inherently subjective, the amounts ultimately realized may differ materially from the carrying value as of the balance sheet date. If upon completion of the assessment, the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral is less than the net carrying value of the loan, a loan loss reserve is recorded with a corresponding charge to the provision for loan losses. The loan loss
13
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
reserve for each loan is maintained at a level that is determined to be adequate by management to absorb probable losses.
Income recognition is suspended for loans at the earlier of the date at which payments become 90-days past due or when, in the opinion of the Company, a full recovery of income and principal becomes doubtful. When the ultimate collectability of the principal of an impaired loan is in doubt, all payments are applied to principal under the cost recovery method. When the ultimate collectability of the principal of an impaired loan is not in doubt, contractual interest is recorded as interest income when received, under the cash basis method until an accrual is resumed when the loan becomes contractually current and performance is demonstrated to be resumed. A loan is written off when it is no longer realizable and/or legally discharged.
Real Estate Securities
CRE securities for which the fair value option is elected are not evaluated for other-than-temporary impairment ("OTTI") as changes in fair value are recorded in the Company's consolidated statements of operations. Realized losses on such securities are reclassified to realized gain (loss) on investments and other as losses occur. CRE securities for which the fair value option is not elected are evaluated for OTTI quarterly.
Operating Real Estate
The Company's real estate portfolio is reviewed on a quarterly basis, or more frequently as necessary, to assess whether there are any indicators that the value of its operating real estate may be impaired or that its carrying value may not be recoverable. A property's value is considered impaired if the Company's estimate of the aggregate future undiscounted cash flows to be generated by the property is less than the carrying value of the property. In conducting this review, the Company considers United States macroeconomic factors, including real estate sector conditions, together with asset specific and other factors. To the extent an impairment has occurred, the loss will be measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the property over the calculated fair value of the property.
Allowances for doubtful accounts for tenant/operator receivables are established based on periodic review of aged receivables resulting from estimated losses due to the inability of tenants/operators to make required rent and other payments contractually due. Additionally, the Company establishes, on a current basis, an allowance for future tenant/operator credit losses on billed and unbilled rents receivable based upon an evaluation of the collectability of such amounts.
Troubled Debt Restructuring
CRE debt investments modified in a troubled debt restructuring ("TDR") are modifications granting a concession to a borrower experiencing financial difficulties where a lender agrees to terms that are more favorable to the borrower than is otherwise available in the current market. Management judgment is necessary to determine whether a loan modification is considered a TDR. Troubled debt that is fully satisfied via taking title to a property, repossession or other transfers of assets is generally included in the definition of TDR. Loans acquired as a pool with deteriorated credit quality that have been modified are not considered a TDR.
14
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Other
Refer to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 for a complete discussion of the Company's significant accounting policies.
Recently Issued Pronouncements
In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued an accounting update to amend existing guidance concerning fair value measurements and disclosures. The update is intended to achieve common fair value measurements and disclosure requirements under U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards and is effective in the first interim or annual period beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company adopted this accounting update in the first quarter 2012 and the required disclosures have been incorporated into Note 4 of the consolidated financial statements. The adoption did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued an accounting update concerning the presentation of comprehensive income. The update requires either a single, continuous statement of comprehensive income be included in the statement of operations or an additional statement of comprehensive income immediately following the statement of operations. The update does not change the components of OCI that must be reported but it eliminates the option to present OCI on the statement of equity. In December 2011, the FASB issued an accounting update to defer the requirement to present the reclassification adjustments to OCI by component and are currently redeliberating this requirement. The remaining requirements of the accounting update were effective for the Company in the first quarter 2012 and were applied retrospectively to all periods reported after the effective date. There was no impact on the consolidated financial statements as the Company currently complies with the update.
3. Variable Interest Entities
The Company has evaluated its CRE debt and security investments, investments in unconsolidated ventures, liabilities to subsidiary trusts issuing preferred securities ("junior subordinated notes") and its collateralized debt obligations ("CDOs") to determine whether they are a VIE. The Company monitors these investments and, to the extent it has determined that it potentially owns a majority of the current controlling class, analyzes them for potential consolidation. The Company will continue to analyze future investments and liabilities, as well as reconsideration events, including a modified loan deemed to be a troubled debt restructuring, pursuant to the VIE requirements. These analyses require considerable judgment in determining the primary beneficiary of a VIE. This could result in the consolidation of an entity that would otherwise not have been consolidated or the non-consolidation of an entity that would have otherwise have been consolidated.
Consolidated VIEs (the Company is the primary beneficiary)
The Company has sponsored nine CDOs, which are referred to as the N-Star CDOs. In addition, the Company has acquired the equity interests of two CDOs, the CSE RE 2006-A CDO ("CSE CDO") and the CapLease 2005-1 CDO ("CapLease CDO"). The Company collectively refers to subordinate CDO bonds, preferred shares and equity notes as equity interests in a CDO. In the case of the CSE
15
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
3. Variable Interest Entities (Continued)
CDO, the Company was delegated the collateral management and special servicing rights, and for the CapLease CDO, the Company acquired the collateral management rights.
The CRE debt investments that serve as collateral for the CDO financing transactions include first mortgage loans, subordinate mortgage interests, mezzanine loans, credit tenant loans and other loans. The CRE securities that serve as collateral for the CDO financing transactions include commercial mortgage-backed securities ("CMBS"), unsecured REIT debt and CDO notes backed primarily by CRE securities and CRE debt. By financing these assets with long-term borrowings through the issuance of CDO bonds, the Company seeks to generate attractive risk-adjusted equity returns and to match the term of its assets and liabilities. In connection with these financing transactions, the Company has various forms of significant ongoing involvement, which may include: (i) holding senior or subordinated interests in the CDOs; (ii) asset management; and (iii) entering into derivative contracts to manage interest rate risk. Each CDO transaction is considered a VIE. The Company has determined it is the primary beneficiary, and as a result, consolidates all of its CDO financing transactions, including the CSE CDO and CapLease CDO.
16
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
3. Variable Interest Entities (Continued)
The following table presents the classification and carrying value of assets and liabilities of consolidated VIEs as of September 30, 2012 (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | N-Star I | | N-Star II | | N-Star III | | N-Star IV | | N-Star V | | N-Star VI | | N-Star VII | | N-Star VIII | | N-Star IX | | CSE CDO | | CapLease CDO | | Total | |
---|
Assets of consolidated VIEs: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Restricted cash | | $ | 3,908 | | $ | 446 | | $ | 14,469 | | $ | 20,701 | | $ | 1,132 | | $ | 53,105 | | $ | 1,315 | | $ | 43,670 | | $ | 5,602 | | $ | 95,764 | | $ | 3,619 | | $ | 243,731 | |
Operating real estate, net | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 71,503 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 264,358 | | | — | | | 4,303 | | | — | | | 340,164 | |
Real estate securities, available for sale | | | 130,558 | | | 134,200 | | | 114,168 | | | 31,630 | | | 140,708 | | | 36,371 | | | 131,662 | | | 11,198 | | | 341,976 | | | 39,518 | | | 13,886 | | | 1,125,875 | |
Real estate debt investments, net | | | — | | | — | | | 10,455 | | | 209,059 | | | — | | | 294,887 | | | — | | | 481,697 | | | 50,123 | | | 346,947 | | | 119,963 | | | 1,513,131 | |
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated ventures | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 2,586 | | | — | | | 60,245 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 62,831 | |
Receivables, net of allowance | | | 1,108 | | | 1,211 | | | 1,226 | | | 1,197 | | | 1,326 | | | 872 | | | 1,671 | | | 2,897 | | | 3,532 | | | 2,839 | | | 696 | | | 18,575 | |
Deferred costs and intangible assets, net | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 2,976 | | | — | | | 83 | | | — | | | 37,061 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 40,120 | |
Assets of properties held for sale | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1,595 | | | — | | | 1,595 | |
Other assets | | | 27 | | | 8 | | | 39 | | | 986 | | | 27 | | | 68 | | | 2,912 | | | 2,724 | | | 561 | | | 6,605 | | | 106 | | | 14,063 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets of consolidated VIEs(1) | | | 135,601 | | | 135,865 | | | 140,357 | | | 338,052 | | | 143,193 | | | 387,972 | | | 137,560 | | | 903,850 | | | 401,794 | | | 497,571 | | | 138,270 | | | 3,360,085 | |
Liabilities of consolidated VIEs: | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | |
CDO bonds payable | | | 121,294 | | | 82,573 | | | 72,480 | | | 140,060 | | | 112,105 | | | 201,182 | | | 105,888 | | | 376,704 | | | 241,373 | | | 536,570 | | | 114,553 | | | 2,104,782 | |
Mortgage notes payable | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 228,446 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 228,446 | |
Secured term loan | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 14,682 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 14,682 | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | | 792 | | | 19 | | | 647 | | | 1,916 | | | 412 | | | 405 | | | 346 | | | 5,287 | | | 1,537 | | | 2,627 | | | 1,135 | | | 15,123 | |
Escrow deposits payable | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 5,582 | | | — | | | 34,437 | | | — | | | 19,942 | | | 339 | | | 15,265 | | | 352 | | | 75,917 | |
Derivative liabilities, at fair value | | | 2,036 | | | — | | | 13,374 | | | — | | | 33,927 | | | 7,116 | | | 46,726 | | | 25,131 | | | 46,536 | | | 13,566 | | | — | | | 188,412 | |
Other liabilities | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1,207 | | | — | | | — | | | 349 | | | 19,331 | | | 4,636 | | | 17 | | | — | | | 25,540 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities of consolidated VIEs(2) | | | 124,122 | | | 82,592 | | | 86,501 | | | 148,765 | | | 146,444 | | | 257,822 | | | 153,309 | | | 674,841 | | | 294,421 | | | 568,045 | | | 116,040 | | | 2,652,902 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net | | $ | 11,479 | | $ | 53,273 | | $ | 53,856 | | $ | 189,287 | | $ | (3,251 | ) | $ | 130,150 | | $ | (15,749 | ) | $ | 229,009 | | $ | 107,373 | | $ | (70,474 | ) | $ | 22,230 | | $ | 707,183 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- (1)
- Assets of each of the consolidated VIEs may only be used to settle obligations of the respective VIE.
- (2)
- Creditors of each of the consolidated VIEs have no recourse to the general credit of the Company.
The Company is not contractually required to provide financial support to any of its consolidated VIEs, however, the Company, in its capacity as collateral manager and/or special servicer, may in its sole discretion provide support such as protective and other advances it deems appropriate. The Company did not provide any other financial support for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.
Unconsolidated VIEs (the Company is not the primary beneficiary, but has a variable interest)
Based on management's analysis, the Company is not the primary beneficiary of VIEs it has identified since it does not have both the: (i) power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance; and (ii) obligation to absorb the losses of the VIE or the
17
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
3. Variable Interest Entities (Continued)
right to receive the benefits from the VIE, which could be significant to the VIE. Accordingly, these VIEs are not consolidated into the Company's financial statements as of September 30, 2012.
Real Estate Debt Investments
The Company identified two real estate debt investments in the second quarter 2012 to one borrower with a total carrying value of $49.1 million as variable interests in a VIE. The Company has determined that it is not the primary beneficiary of this VIE, and as such, the VIE should not be consolidated in the Company's financial statements. For all other real estate debt investments, the Company has determined that these investments are not VIEs and, as such, the Company has continued to account for all real estate debt investments as loans.
Real Estate Securities
The Company has identified 12 CRE securities with a fair value of $60.6 million as variable interests in VIEs. The Company has determined that it is not the primary beneficiary, and as such, these VIEs are not consolidated in the Company's financial statements.
In prior years, in connection with three existing CMBS investments, the Company became the controlling class of a securitization the Company did not sponsor. The Company determined each securitization was a VIE. However, the Company determined at that time and continues to believe that it does not currently or potentially hold a significant interest in any of these securitizations and, therefore, is not the primary beneficiary.
In March 2011, in connection with existing investments of certain CMBS, the Company became the controlling class of a securitization the Company did not sponsor. The Company determined it was the primary beneficiary due to having ownership in more than 50% of the controlling class and the right to appoint the special servicer, which gave the Company the power to direct the activities that impact the economic performance of the VIE. However, the Company sold a significant portion of this investment, and as such, it was determined the Company was no longer the primary beneficiary. In September 2011, the Company was appointed special servicer for a loan in this securitization. The Company does not currently or potentially hold a significant interest and, therefore, is not the primary beneficiary.
In June 2011, the Company acquired the "B-piece" in a new $2.1 billion CMBS securitization. The Company was appointed as special servicer for the securitization. The Company has determined that the securitization is a VIE. However, the Company determined at that time and continues to believe that it does not currently or potentially hold a significant interest and, therefore, is not the primary beneficiary.
In August 2011, the Company invested in a securitization collateralized by originally investment grade rated N-Star CDO bonds. The Company has determined that the securitization is a VIE. However, the Company determined at that time and continues to believe that it does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the VIE and does not currently or potentially hold a significant interest and, therefore, is not the primary beneficiary.
18
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
3. Variable Interest Entities (Continued)
In March 2012, the Company invested in a securitization collateralized by originally investment grade rated N-Star CDO bonds. The Company has determined that the securitization is a VIE. However, the Company determined at that time and continues to believe that it does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the VIE and does not currently or potentially hold a significant interest and, therefore, is not the primary beneficiary.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, in connection with five existing CMBS investments, the Company became the controlling class of a securitization the Company did not sponsor. The Company determined each securitization was a VIE. However, the Company determined at that time and continues to believe that it does not currently or potentially hold a significant interest in any of these securitizations and, therefore, is not the primary beneficiary.
NorthStar Realty Finance Trusts
The Company owns all of the common stock of NorthStar Realty Finance Trusts I through VIII (collectively, the "Trusts"). The Trusts were formed to issue trust preferred securities. The Company determined that the holders of the trust preferred securities were the primary beneficiaries of the Trusts. As a result, the Company did not consolidate the Trusts and has accounted for the investment in the common stock of the Trusts under the equity method of accounting.
The following table presents the classification, carrying value and maximum exposure of unconsolidated VIEs as of September 30, 2012 (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Junior Subordinated Notes, at Fair Value | | Real Estate Debt Investments | | Real Estate Securities, Available for Sale | | Total | | Maximum Exposure to Loss(1) | |
---|
Real estate debt investments | | $ | — | | $ | 49,082 | | $ | — | | $ | 49,082 | | $ | 49,082 | |
Real estate securities, available for sale | | | — | | | — | | | 60,583 | | | 60,583 | | | 60,583 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | | — | | | 49,082 | | | 60,583 | | | 109,665 | | | 109,665 | |
Junior subordinated notes, at fair value | | | 182,100 | | | — | | | — | | | 182,100 | | | NA | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 182,100 | | | — | | | — | | | 182,100 | | | NA | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Net | | $ | (182,100 | ) | $ | 49,082 | | $ | 60,583 | | $ | (72,435 | ) | | NA | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
- (1)
- The Company's maximum exposure to loss as of September 30, 2012 would not exceed the carrying value of its investment.
The Company did not provide financial support to any of its unconsolidated VIEs during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011. As of September 30, 2012, there were no explicit arrangements or implicit variable interests that could require the Company to provide financial support to any of its unconsolidated VIEs.
19
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
4. Fair Value
Fair Value Measurement
The Company follows fair value guidance in accordance with U.S. GAAP to account for its financial instruments. The Company categorizes its financial instruments, based on the priority of the inputs to the valuation technique, into a three-level fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). If the inputs used to measure the financial instruments fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.
Financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets are categorized based on the inputs to the valuation techniques as follows:
| | | | |
Level 1. | | Quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market. |
Level 2. | | Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on the following: |
| | a) | | Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets. |
| | b) | | Quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in non-active markets. |
| | c) | | Pricing models whose inputs are observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. |
| | d) | | Pricing models whose inputs are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. |
Level 3. | | Prices or valuation techniques based on inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. |
Determination of Fair Value
The following is a description of the valuation techniques used to measure fair value and the general classification of these instruments pursuant to the fair value hierarchy.
Real Estate Securities
CRE securities are generally valued using a third-party pricing service or broker quotations. These quotations are not adjusted and are based on observable inputs that can be validated, and as such, are classified as Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Certain CRE securities are valued based on a single broker quote or an internal price which have less observable pricing, and as such, are classified as Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Derivative Instruments
Derivative instruments are valued using a third-party pricing service. These quotations are not adjusted and are generally based on valuation models with market observable inputs such as interest rates and contractual cash flows, and as such, are classified as Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Derivative instruments are also assessed for credit valuation adjustments due to the risk of non-performance by the Company and derivative counterparties. However, since the majority of the
20
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
4. Fair Value (Continued)
Company's derivatives are held in non-recourse CDO financing structures where, by design, the derivative contracts are senior to all the CDO bonds payable, there is no material impact of a credit valuation adjustment.
CDO Bonds Payable
CDO bonds payable are valued using quotations from nationally recognized financial institutions that generally acted as underwriter for the transactions. These quotations are not adjusted and are generally based on valuation models using market observable inputs for interest rates and other unobservable inputs for assumptions related to the timing and amount of expected future cash flows, the discount rate, estimated prepayments and projected losses. CDO bonds payable are classified as Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Junior Subordinated Notes
Junior subordinated notes are valued using quotations from nationally recognized financial institutions. These quotations are not adjusted and are generally based on a valuation model using market observable inputs for interest rates and other unobservable inputs for assumptions related to the implied credit spread of the Company's other borrowings and the timing and amount of expected future cash flows. Junior subordinated notes are classified as Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Fair Value Measurement
Financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
21
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
4. Fair Value (Continued)
The following tables present the Company's financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 by level within the fair value hierarchy (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2012 | |
---|
| | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total | |
---|
Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Real estate securities, available for sale: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CMBS | | $ | — | | $ | 796,287 | | $ | 283,402 | | $ | 1,079,689 | |
Third-party CDO notes | | | — | | | — | | | 68,334 | | | 68,334 | |
Unsecured REIT debt | | | — | | | 71,210 | | | 135 | | | 71,345 | |
Trust preferred securities | | | — | | | — | | | 8,614 | | | 8,614 | |
Agency debentures | | | — | | | 25,958 | | | — | | | 25,958 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal real estate securities, available for sale | | | — | | | 893,455 | | | 360,485 | | | 1,253,940 | |
Derivative assets | | | — | | | 9,425 | | | — | | | 9,425 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | — | | $ | 902,880 | | $ | 360,485 | | $ | 1,263,365 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CDO bonds payable(1) | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 1,990,229 | | $ | 1,990,229 | |
Junior subordinated notes | | | — | | | — | | | 182,100 | | | 182,100 | |
Derivative liabilities | | | — | | | 188,412 | | | — | | | 188,412 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | $ | — | | $ | 188,412 | | $ | 2,172,329 | | $ | 2,360,741 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
- (1)
- Excludes CapLease CDO bonds payable for which the fair value option was not elected.
22
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
4. Fair Value (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2011 | |
---|
| | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total | |
---|
Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Real estate securities, available for sale: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CMBS | | $ | — | | $ | 936,315 | | $ | 336,421 | | $ | 1,272,736 | |
Third-party CDO notes | | | — | | | — | | | 63,567 | | | 63,567 | |
Unsecured REIT debt | | | — | | | 90,824 | | | 3,474 | | | 94,298 | |
Trust preferred securities | | | — | | | — | | | 19,145 | | | 19,145 | |
Agency debentures | | | — | | | 23,559 | | | — | | | 23,559 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal real estate securities, available for sale | | | — | | | 1,050,698 | | | 422,607 | | | 1,473,305 | |
Derivative assets | | | — | | | 5,735 | | | — | | | 5,735 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | — | | $ | 1,056,433 | | $ | 422,607 | | $ | 1,479,040 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CDO bonds payable(1) | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 2,145,239 | | $ | 2,145,239 | |
Junior subordinated notes | | | — | | | — | | | 157,168 | | | 157,168 | |
Derivative liabilities | | | — | | | 234,674 | | | — | | | 234,674 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | $ | — | | $ | 234,674 | | $ | 2,302,407 | | $ | 2,537,081 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
- (1)
- Excludes CapLease CDO bonds payable for which the fair value option was not elected.
The following table presents additional information about the Company's financial assets and liabilities which are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2012 and
23
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
4. Fair Value (Continued)
December 31, 2011, for which the Company has utilized Level 3 inputs to determine fair value (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2012 | | December 31, 2011 | |
---|
| | Real Estate Securities | | CDO Bonds Payable | | Junior Subordinated Notes | | Real Estate Securities | | CDO Bonds Payable | | Junior Subordinated Notes | |
---|
Beginning balance(1) | | $ | 422,607 | | $ | 2,145,239 | | $ | 157,168 | | $ | 492,576 | | $ | 2,258,805 | | $ | 191,250 | |
Transfers into Level 3(2) | | | 75,317 | | | — | | | — | | | 178,098 | | | — | | | — | |
Transfers out of Level 3(2) | | | (97,502 | ) | | — | | | — | | | (112,601 | ) | | — | | | — | |
Purchases / borrowings / amortization | | | 49,154 | | | 20,498 | | | | | | 163,028 | | | 65,200 | | | — | |
Sales | | | (59,891 | ) | | — | | | — | | | (123,757 | ) | | — | | | — | |
Paydowns | | | (64,979 | ) | | (515,972 | ) | | — | | | (50,389 | ) | | (325,989 | ) | | — | |
Repurchases | | | — | | | (76,655 | ) | | — | | | — | | | (75,316 | ) | | — | |
Losses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Realized losses included in earnings | | | (2,749 | ) | | 13,923 | | | — | | | (12,252 | ) | | 25,521 | | | — | |
Unrealized losses included in earnings | | | (30,428 | ) | | 403,196 | | | 24,932 | | | (140,725 | ) | | 199,665 | | | — | |
Included in other comprehensive income (loss) | | | (563 | ) | | — | | | — | | | (7,676 | ) | | — | | | — | |
Gains: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Realized gains included in earnings | | | 11,710 | | | — | | | — | | | 17,495 | | | (35 | ) | | — | |
Unrealized gains included in earnings | | | 51,410 | | | — | | | — | | | 18,800 | | | (2,612 | ) | | (34,082 | ) |
Included in other comprehensive income (loss) | | | 6,399 | | | — | | | — | | | 10 | | | — | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ending balance | | $ | 360,485 | | $ | 1,990,229 | | $ | 182,100 | | $ | 422,607 | | $ | 2,145,239 | | $ | 157,168 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gains (losses) included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets or liabilities still held. | | $ | 15,892 | | $ | (248,892 | ) | $ | (24,932 | ) | $ | (127,330 | ) | $ | (119,799 | ) | $ | 34,082 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- (1)
- Reflects the balance as of January 1, 2012 and 2011 for the periods ended September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.
- (2)
- Transfers between Level 2 and Level 3 represent a fair value measurement from a third-party pricing service or broker quotations that have become less observable during the period. Transfers are assumed to occur at the beginning of the year.
The Company relies on the third-party pricing exception with respect to the requirement to provide quantitative disclosures about significant Level 3 inputs being used. The Company believes such pricing service or broker quotations may be based on market transactions with comparable coupons and credit (such as credit support and delinquency rates). Significant increases (decreases) in any one of the inputs in isolation may result in a significantly different fair value for the financial assets and liabilities utilizing such Level 3 inputs.
24
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
4. Fair Value (Continued)
The Company's non-recurring financial measurements include the measurement of provision for loan losses on CRE debt and provision for loss on equity investments in unconsolidated ventures, which are classified as Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The provision for loan losses are generally based on a discounted cash flow model of a loan's underlying collateral. The key unobservable inputs used to determine the provision for loan losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 included discount rates ranging from 7.0% to 15.5%, with a weighted average discount rate of 9.1% and capitalization rates ranging from 5.0% to 23.0%, with a weighted average capitalization rate of 8.0%. Refer to Note 7 for a further discussion of impairment on the Company's CRE debt and Note 8 for a discussion of impairment on investments in unconsolidated ventures, if any.
Fair Value Option
The Company has generally elected to apply the fair value option of accounting to the following financial assets and liabilities existing at the time of adoption or at the time the Company recognizes the eligible item for the purpose of consistent accounting application: CRE securities; CDO bonds payable; and junior subordinated notes. Given recent market volatility, the Company has observed that the impact of electing the fair value option would result in additional variability to the Company's statement of operations which management believes is not a useful presentation. Therefore, the Company more recently has not elected the fair value option. The Company may elect the fair value option for certain of its financial assets or liabilities due to the nature of the instrument.
The following table presents the fair value of the Company's financial instruments for which the fair value option was elected as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2012 | | December 31, 2011 | |
---|
Assets: | | | | | | | |
Real estate securities, available for sale:(1) | | | | | | | |
CMBS | | $ | 997,696 | | $ | 1,199,660 | |
Third-party CDO notes | | | 42,555 | | | 40,231 | |
Unsecured REIT debt | | | 71,345 | | | 94,298 | |
Trust preferred securities | | | 8,614 | | | 19,145 | |
Agency debentures | | | 25,958 | | | 23,559 | |
| | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 1,146,168 | | $ | 1,376,893 | |
| | | | | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | |
CDO bonds payable(2) | | $ | 1,990,229 | | $ | 2,145,239 | |
Junior subordinated notes | | | 182,100 | | | 157,168 | |
| | | | | |
Total liabilities | | $ | 2,172,329 | | $ | 2,302,407 | |
| | | | | |
- (1)
- September 30, 2012 excludes 23 CRE securities with an aggregate carrying value of $107.8 million for which the fair value option was not elected. December 31, 2011 excludes ten CRE securities with an aggregate carrying value of $96.4 million for which the fair value option was not elected.
25
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
4. Fair Value (Continued)
- (2)
- September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 excludes CapLease CDO bonds payable with a carrying value of $114.6 million and $128.7 million for which the fair value option was not elected, respectively.
The following table presents the difference between the fair value and the aggregate principal amount of liabilities, for which the fair value option has been elected as of September 30, 2012 (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair Value at September 30, 2012 | | Amount Due Upon Maturity | | Difference | |
---|
CDO bonds payable(1) | | $ | 1,990,229 | | $ | 3,328,794 | | $ | (1,338,565 | ) |
Junior subordinated notes | | | 182,100 | | | 280,117 | | | (98,017 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | $ | 2,172,329 | | $ | 3,608,911 | | $ | (1,436,582 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
- (1)
- Excludes the CapLease CDO bonds payable for which the fair value option was not elected.
The Company attributes the change in the fair value of floating-rate liabilities to changes in instrument-specific credit spreads. For fixed-rate liabilities, the Company attributes the change in fair value to interest rate-related and instrument-specific credit spread changes.
Changes in Fair Value Recorded in the Statements of Operations
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company recognized the following unrealized gains (losses) on investments and other related to the change in fair value of financial assets and liabilities in the consolidated statements of operations (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
---|
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 | |
---|
Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Real estate securities, available for sale | | $ | 24,109 | | $ | (201,117 | ) | $ | 49,048 | | $ | (93,627 | ) |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CDO bonds payable | | | (193,721 | ) | | 162,271 | | | (403,196 | ) | | (162,531 | ) |
Junior subordinated notes | | | (20,726 | ) | | 55,686 | | | (24,932 | ) | | 39,970 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal(1) | | | (190,338 | ) | | 16,840 | | | (379,080 | ) | | (216,188 | ) |
Derivatives | | | 6,871 | | | (60,712 | ) | | 27,166 | | | (55,553 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | (183,467 | ) | $ | (43,872 | ) | $ | (351,914 | ) | $ | (271,741 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
- (1)
- Represents financial assets and liabilities for which the fair value option was elected.
26
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
4. Fair Value (Continued)
The remaining amount of unrealized gains (losses) on investments and other on the Company's consolidated statements of operations relates to net cash payments for interest rate swaps. Refer to Note 14 for a discussion of the Company's derivative instruments.
The unrealized losses for CDO bonds payable attributable to paydowns at par and repurchases were $35.7 million and $154.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively. The remaining amount relates to the changes in fair value.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
In addition to the above disclosures regarding financial assets or liabilities which are recorded at fair value, U.S. GAAP requires disclosure of fair value about all financial instruments. Estimated fair value of financial instruments was determined by the Company, using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop estimated fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could realize on disposition of the financial instruments. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on estimated fair value.
The fair value of certain financial assets and liabilities and other financial instruments are presented below as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2012 | | December 31, 2011 | |
---|
| | Principal / Notional Amount | | Carrying Value | | Fair Value | | Principal / Notional Amount | | Carrying Value | | Fair Value | |
---|
Financial assets:(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Real estate securities, available for sale(2) | | $ | 2,748,360 | | $ | 1,253,940 | | $ | 1,253,940 | | $ | 3,234,145 | | $ | 1,473,305 | | $ | 1,473,305 | |
Real estate debt investments, net | | | 2,450,610 | | | 1,830,048 | | | 1,748,777 | | | 2,354,932 | | | 1,710,582 | | | 1,609,517 | |
Derivative assets(2)(3) | | | 815,500 | | | 9,425 | | | 9,425 | | | 468,500 | | | 5,735 | | | 5,735 | |
Financial liabilities:(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CDO bonds payable(2) | | $ | 3,462,955 | | $ | 2,104,782 | | $ | 2,101,812 | | $ | 4,125,769 | | $ | 2,273,907 | | $ | 2,273,253 | |
Mortgage notes payable | | | 781,107 | | | 781,107 | | | 801,461 | | | 783,257 | | | 783,257 | | | 801,710 | |
Credit facilities | | | 150,146 | | | 150,146 | | | 150,146 | | | 64,259 | | | 64,259 | | | 64,259 | |
Secured term loan | | | 14,682 | | | 14,682 | | | 15,376 | | | 14,682 | | | 14,682 | | | 15,443 | |
Exchangeable senior notes | | | 303,165 | | | 290,256 | | | 339,889 | | | 228,665 | | | 215,853 | | | 221,948 | |
Junior subordinated notes(2) | | | 280,117 | | | 182,100 | | | 182,100 | | | 280,117 | | | 157,168 | | | 157,168 | |
Derivative liabilities(2)(3) | | | 1,462,145 | | | 188,412 | | | 188,412 | | | 1,836,972 | | | 234,674 | | | 234,674 | |
- (1)
- The fair value of other financial instruments not included in this table is estimated to approximate their carrying amounts.
27
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
4. Fair Value (Continued)
- (2)
- Refer to the "Determination of Fair Value" above for a discussion of methodologies used to determine fair value.
- (3)
- Derivative assets and liabilities exclude timing swaps with an aggregate notional amount of $63.5 million and $288.8 million as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.
Disclosure about fair value of financial instruments is based on pertinent information available to management as of the reporting date. Although management is not aware of any factors that would significantly affect fair value, such amounts have not been comprehensively revalued for purposes of these consolidated financial statements since that date and current estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the amounts presented herein.
Real Estate Debt Investments, Net
For CRE debt investments, fair value of the fixed- and floating-rate investments was approximated by comparing the current yield to the estimated yield for newly originated loans with similar credit risk or the market yield at which a third party might expect to purchase such investment. Prices were calculated assuming fully-extended maturities regardless of structural or economic tests required to achieve such extended maturities. For any CRE debt investments that are deemed impaired, carrying value approximates fair value. These fair value measurements of CRE debt are generally based on unobservable inputs and are, therefore, classified as Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Mortgage Notes Payable
For mortgage notes payable, the Company uses rates currently available with similar terms and remaining maturities to estimate fair value. These measurements are determined using comparable U.S. Treasury rates as of the end of the reporting period. These fair value measurements are based on observable inputs and are classified as Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Credit Facilities
The Company has amounts outstanding under three term credit facilities all of which bear floating rates of interest. As of the reporting date, the Company believes the carrying value approximated fair value. These fair value measurements are based on observable inputs and are classified as Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Secured Term Loan
Secured term loan includes the Company's Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility ("TALF") borrowing. The estimated fair value is based on interest rates available for issuance of debt with similar terms and remaining maturities. This fair value measurement is based on observable inputs and is classified as Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
28
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
4. Fair Value (Continued)
Exchangeable Senior Notes
For the exchangeable senior notes, the Company uses available market information, which includes quoted market prices or recent transactions, if available, to estimate their fair value and are, therefore, based on observable inputs and are classified as Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
The following table presents the exchangeable senior notes as of September 30, 2012 (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount | | Carrying Value | | Fair Value | |
---|
11.50% Notes | | $ | 35,710 | | $ | 35,553 | | $ | 37,710 | |
7.25% Notes | | | 12,955 | | | 12,955 | | | 13,231 | |
7.50% Notes(1) | | | 172,500 | | | 161,939 | | | 196,788 | |
8.875% Notes | | | 82,000 | | | 79,809 | | | 92,160 | |
| | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 303,165 | | $ | 290,256 | | $ | 339,889 | |
| | | | | | | |
- (1)
- As of September 30, 2012, the exchange price was $6.24.
5. Operating Real Estate
Operating Real Estate and REO Held for Investment
In January 2012, the Company acquired a 71-unit independent living facility located in Lancaster, Ohio for $6.5 million. Contemporaneously, the Company entered into a borrowing agreement for $4.5 million.
In April 2012, in connection with a debt investment, the Company took title to a student housing property located in Los Angeles, California. The Company's loan had a $25.2 million carrying value at such time, which approximated fair value.
The Company estimated the fair value of the assets and liabilities for all real estate acquired (including taking title to a property) at the date of acquisition. The final allocation of the purchase price is subject to refinement upon receipt of all information requested related to the properties.
29
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
5. Operating Real Estate (Continued)
The following table presents the Company's preliminary allocation of purchase price of the assets and liabilities assumed upon acquisition related to 2011 and 2012 acquisitions that continue to be subject to refinement upon receipt of all information (dollars in thousands):
| | | | |
Assets: | | | | |
Restricted cash | | $ | 2,015 | |
Operating real estate, net | | | 72,499 | |
Deferred costs and intangible assets | | | 666 | |
Other assets | | | 45 | |
| | | |
Total assets | | $ | 75,225 | |
| | | |
Liabilities: | | | | |
Mortgage notes payable | | $ | 4,500 | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | | 410 | |
Other liabilities | | | 104 | |
| | | |
Total liabilities | | | 5,014 | |
Total equity | | | 70,211 | |
| | | |
Total liabilities and equity | | $ | 75,225 | |
| | | |
Other REO
For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, in connection with a debt investment, the Company acquired other REO by taking title to a retail property located in Park City, Utah and a hotel located in Arlington, Texas. The original loan balance of the retail property was $10.7 million and the initial REO value recorded was $4.0 million. The original loan balance of the hotel property and the initial REO value recorded was $6.1 million. Both initial REO values approximated fair value.
30
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
5. Operating Real Estate (Continued)
Operating Real Estate Sales
The Company completed the following sales of operating real estate for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Date | | Type | | Location | | Sales Proceeds | | Realized Gain (Loss) | |
---|
2012 | | | | | | | | | | | |
January 2012 | | Land | | Aventura, FL | | $ | 5,068 | | $ | 2,011 | |
June 2012 | | Land | | Florence, AZ | | | 1,356 | | | 1,001 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 6,424 | | | 3,012 | (1) |
April 2012 | | Office | | Indianapolis, IN | | | 2,118 | | | 314 | (2) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | | | | $ | 8,542 | | $ | 3,326 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
2011 | | | | | | | | | | | |
March 2011 | | Retail | | New York, NY | | $ | 6,889 | | $ | 4,981 | |
March 2011 | | Office | | Philadelphia, PA | | | 8,280 | | | 50 | |
May 2011 | | Healthcare | | Various Wisconsin | | | 99,569 | | | 9,416 | |
August 2011 | | Multifamily | | Norcross, GA | | | 7,122 | | | 2,881 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | | | | $ | 121,860 | | $ | 17,328 | (2) |
| | | | | | | | | |
- (1)
- Included in realized gains (losses) on investments and other.
- (2)
- Included in gain (loss) from discontinued operations.
In addition, for the three months ended September 30, 2012, the Company sold nine timeshare units for total sales proceeds of $5.8 million resulting in a realized gain of $4.9 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company sold 31 timeshare units for total sales proceeds of $16.8 million, including seller financing of $0.2 million, resulting in a realized gain of $16.1 million ($2.1 million related to prior gains no longer deferred). For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company sold seven timeshare units for total sales proceeds of $0.9 million, including seller financing of $0.1 million, resulting in a realized gain of $0.7 million.
Discontinued Operations
In January 2012, in connection with a partial interest in a debt investment, the Company took title to a healthcare property located in Lexington, Kentucky. The loan had a zero carrying value at such time. Contemporaneous with taking title, the Company purchased the remaining interest in the loan from a third party for $0.8 million implying a total value of $1.0 million and as a result, the Company recorded $0.3 million in other income (loss) in the consolidated statements of operations. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, assets held for sale relate to this healthcare property. The remaining asset held for sale is land which is not deemed to be a discontinued operation.
31
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
5. Operating Real Estate (Continued)
The following table presents income (loss) from discontinued operations and related gain (loss) on sale from discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
---|
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 | |
---|
Revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rental and escalation income | | $ | — | | $ | 1,175 | | $ | — | | $ | 4,909 | |
Other revenue | | | — | | | 96 | | | — | | | 218 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total revenue | | | — | | | 1,271 | | | — | | | 5,127 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Real estate properties—operating expenses | | | 18 | | | 617 | | | 77 | | | 1,286 | |
Other interest expense | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 2,177 | |
General and administrative expenses | | | 5 | | | 670 | | | 5 | | | 1,526 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | — | | | — | | | 6 | | | 792 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total expenses | | | 23 | | | 1,287 | | | 88 | | | 5,781 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | | | (23 | ) | | (16 | ) | | (88 | ) | | (654 | ) |
Gain (loss) on sale from discontinued operations | | | 29 | (1) | | 2,881 | (2) | | 314 | (1) | | 17,328 | (3) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total income from discontinued operations | | $ | 6 | | $ | 2,865 | | $ | 226 | | $ | 16,674 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
- (1)
- Relates to the sale of an office property.
- (2)
- Relates to the sale of a multifamily property.
- (3)
- Relates to the sale of 18 healthcare assisted living facilities, an office property, a leasehold interest in retail space and a multifamily property.
Midwest Holdings
On March 31, 2011, the Company sold its 100% common membership interest in Midwest Care Holdco TRS I LLC ("Midwest Holdings") and assigned all of its rights, title, obligations and other interests in Midwest Holdings to the purchaser and contemporaneously entered into a new lease agreement with an affiliate of the purchaser. As of March 31, 2011, the operations of Midwest Holdings were deconsolidated. The Company recognized a realized loss of $0.5 million in connection with the sale and deconsolidation of its common membership interest.
32
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
6. Real Estate Securities, Available for Sale
As of September 30, 2012, the Company held the following CRE securities (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Asset Type: | | Number(1) | | Principal Amount | | Amortized Cost | | Cumulative Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments(2) | | Fair Value(3) | | Allocation by Investment Type(4) | | Weighted Average Coupon | | Weighted Average Yield(5) | |
---|
CMBS | | | 526 | | $ | 2,373,496 | | $ | 1,674,434 | | $ | (594,745 | ) | $ | 1,079,689 | | | 86.4 | % | | 3.94 | % | | 11.26 | % |
Third-party CDO notes | | | 37 | | | 225,959 | | | 175,216 | | | (106,882 | ) | | 68,334 | | | 8.2 | % | | 0.63 | % | | 5.20 | % |
Unsecured REIT debt | | | 14 | | | 71,180 | | | 66,632 | | | 4,713 | | | 71,345 | | | 2.6 | % | | 5.61 | % | | 2.74 | % |
Trust preferred securities | | | 3 | | | 14,725 | | | 10,879 | | | (2,265 | ) | | 8,614 | | | 0.5 | % | | 2.37 | % | | 8.28 | % |
Agency debentures | | | 4 | | | 63,000 | | | 17,314 | | | 8,644 | | | 25,958 | | | 2.3 | % | | NA | | | 3.63 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 584 | | $ | 2,748,360 | | $ | 1,944,475 | | $ | (690,535 | ) | $ | 1,253,940 | | | 100.0 | % | | 3.61 | % | | 10.34 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- (1)
- Investments in the same securitization tranche held in separate Company CDOs are reported as separate investments in the table above.
- (2)
- Includes 23 CRE securities for which the fair value option was not elected, representing $0.9 million of net unrealized losses included in other comprehensive income (loss).
- (3)
- $1,125.9 million in carrying value served as collateral for the Company's consolidated CDO financing transactions and $45.7 million in carrying value served as collateral under the Company's CMBS Facility (refer to Note 9) as of September 30, 2012. The remainder is either financed under other borrowing arrangements or unleveraged.
- (4)
- Based on principal amount.
- (5)
- Based on expected maturity and for floating-rate securities, calculated using the applicable LIBOR as of September 30, 2012.
The CMBS portfolio as of September 30, 2012 is comprised of 526 investments that are predominantly conduit CMBS, meaning each asset is a pool backed by a large number of commercial real estate loans. As a result, the portfolio is typically well-diversified by collateral type and geography. As of September 30, 2012, contractual maturities of the CRE securities portfolio ranged from one month to 44 years, with a weighted average expected maturity of 3.0 years.
33
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
6. Real Estate Securities, Available for Sale (Continued)
As of December 31, 2011, the Company held the following CRE securities (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Asset Type: | | Number(1) | | Principal Amount | | Amortized Cost | | Cumulative Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investment(2) | | Fair Value(3) | | Allocation by Investment Type(4) | | Weighted Average Coupon | | Weighted Average Yield(5) | |
---|
CMBS | | | 618 | | $ | 2,767,828 | | $ | 1,964,843 | | $ | (692,107 | ) | $ | 1,272,736 | | | 85.6 | % | | 4.42 | % | | 9.72 | % |
Third-party CDO notes | | | 44 | | | 269,081 | | | 210,080 | | | (146,513 | ) | | 63,567 | | | 8.3 | % | | 0.86 | % | | 10.80 | % |
Unsecured REIT debt | | | 22 | | | 94,236 | | | 88,870 | | | 5,428 | | | 94,298 | | | 2.9 | % | | 5.99 | % | | 2.75 | % |
Trust preferred securities | | | 5 | | | 40,000 | | | 35,105 | | | (15,960 | ) | | 19,145 | | | 1.2 | % | | 2.47 | % | | 10.06 | % |
Agency debentures | | | 4 | | | 63,000 | | | 16,659 | | | 6,900 | | | 23,559 | | | 2.0 | % | | NA | | | 3.84 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 693 | | $ | 3,234,145 | | $ | 2,315,557 | | $ | (842,252 | ) | $ | 1,473,305 | | | 100.0 | % | | 4.06 | % | | 9.50 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- (1)
- Investments in the same securitization tranche held in separate Company CDOs are reported as separate investments in the table above.
- (2)
- Includes ten CRE securities for which the fair value option was not elected, representing $7.5 million of net unrealized losses included in other comprehensive income (loss).
- (3)
- $1,358.3 million in carrying value served as collateral for the Company's consolidated CDO financing transactions and $73.1 million in carrying value served as collateral under the Company's CMBS Facility (refer to Note 9) as of December 31, 2011. The remainder is either financed under other borrowing arrangements or unleveraged.
- (4)
- Based on principal amount.
- (5)
- Based on expected maturity and for floating-rate securities, calculated using the applicable LIBOR as of December 31, 2011.
For the three months ended September 30, 2012, proceeds from the sale of CRE securities were $58.5 million, resulting in a net realized gain of $10.1 million. For the three months ended September 30, 2011, proceeds from the sale of CRE securities were $129.8 million, resulting in a net realized loss of $0.6 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, proceeds from the sale of CRE securities were $258.7 million, resulting in a net realized gain of $26.0 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, proceeds from the sale of CRE securities were $256.3 million, resulting in a net realized gain of $23.5 million.
The Company's CRE securities portfolio includes 23 securities for which the fair value option was not elected. As of September 30, 2012, the aggregate carrying value of these securities was $107.8 million, representing $0.9 million of net unrealized losses included in other comprehensive income (loss). The Company held four securities with an aggregate carrying value of $34.8 million with an unrealized loss of $1.9 million as of September 30, 2012 and all but one of these securities were in an unrealized loss position for a period of less than 12 months. Based on management's quarterly evaluation, no OTTI was identified related to these securities. The Company does not intend to sell these securities and it is more likely than not that the Company will not be required to sell these securities prior to recovery of its amortized cost basis, which may be at maturity.
34
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
7. Real Estate Debt Investments
As of September 30, 2012, the Company held the following CRE debt investments (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | Weighted Average | |
| |
---|
Asset Type: | | Number | | Principal Amount | | Carrying Value(1)(2) | | Allocation by Investment Type(3) | | Fixed Rate | | Spread Over LIBOR(4) | | Spread Over Prime | | Yield(5) | | Floating Rate as % of Principal Amount | |
---|
First mortgage loans | | | 77 | | $ | 1,644,207 | | $ | 1,191,780 | | | 67.1 | % | | 4.24 | % | | 3.25 | % | | 6.74 | % | | 7.38 | % | | 94.1 | % |
Mezzanine loans | | | 18 | | | 442,850 | | | 343,025 | | | 18.1 | % | | 8.53 | % | | 1.59 | % | | — | | | 4.34 | % | | 59.7 | % |
Subordinate mortgage interests | | | 8 | | | 131,062 | | | 95,691 | | | 5.4 | % | | 6.40 | % | | 3.58 | % | | — | | | 5.40 | % | | 77.5 | % |
Credit tenant loans and other notes | | | 51 | | | 131,102 | | | 124,576 | | | 5.3 | % | | 6.58 | % | | — | | | — | | | 7.36 | % | | 0.0 | % |
Term loans | | | 4 | | | 101,389 | | | 74,976 | | | 4.1 | % | | 11.05 | % | | 3.50 | % | | — | | | 12.32 | % | | 5.1 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total/Weighted average | | | 158 | | $ | 2,450,610 | | $ | 1,830,048 | | | 100.0 | % | | 7.61 | % | | 3.03 | % | | 6.74 | % | | 6.81 | % | | 78.3 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- (1)
- $1,513.1 million in carrying value served as collateral for the Company's consolidated CDO financing transactions, $171.4 million in carrying value served as collateral under the Company's credit facilities (refer to Note 9) and the remainder is unleveraged. The Company has future funding commitments, which are subject to certain conditions that borrowers must meet to qualify for such fundings, totaling $64.4 million. The Company expects that $62.4 million of these commitments will be funded from the Company's CDO financing transactions and require no additional capital from the Company. Assuming that all loans that have future fundings meet the terms to qualify for such funding, the Company's cash requirement on future fundings would be $2.0 million.
- (2)
- Includes 11 loans with an aggregate carrying value of $131.3 million on non-accrual status, which were primarily first mortgage loans. Three of these loans are classified as non-performing. Certain loans have an accrual of interest at a specified rate that may be in addition to a current rate. Non-accrual excludes $106.4 million carrying value of loans where the Company does not recognize interest income on the accrual rate but does recognize interest income based on the current rate.
- (3)
- Based on principal amount.
- (4)
- $253.9 million principal amount of the Company's CRE debt investments have a weighted average LIBOR floor of 3.10%.
- (5)
- Based on initial maturity and for floating-rate debt, calculated using one-month LIBOR as of September 30, 2012, and for debt with a LIBOR floor, using such floor.
As of December 31, 2011, the Company held the following CRE debt investments (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | Weighted Average | |
| |
---|
Asset Type: | | Number | | Principal Amount | | Carrying Value(1)(2) | | Allocation by Investment Type(3) | | Fixed Rate | | Spread Over LIBOR(4) | | Spread Over Prime | | Yield(5) | | Floating Rate as % of Principal Amount | |
---|
First mortgage loans | | | 75 | | $ | 1,552,066 | | $ | 1,094,957 | | | 65.9 | % | | 4.77 | % | | 3.06 | % | | 6.94 | % | | 5.23 | % | | 92.4 | % |
Mezzanine loans | | | 17 | | | 426,709 | | | 334,317 | | | 18.1 | % | | 6.43 | % | | 2.21 | % | | — | | | 3.97 | % | | 62.6 | % |
Subordinate mortgage interests | | | 9 | | | 159,289 | | | 96,565 | | | 6.8 | % | | 6.40 | % | | 3.51 | % | | — | | | 4.61 | % | | 81.4 | % |
Credit tenant loans and other notes | | | 55 | | | 147,426 | | | 140,342 | | | 6.3 | % | | 6.49 | % | | — | | | — | | | 6.87 | % | | 0.0 | % |
Term loans | | | 6 | | | 69,442 | | | 44,401 | | | 2.9 | % | | 7.75 | % | | 5.00 | % | | — | | | 8.80 | % | | 15.4 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total/Weighted average | | | 162 | | $ | 2,354,932 | | $ | 1,710,582 | | | 100.0 | % | | 6.21 | % | | 2.97 | % | | 6.94 | % | | 5.11 | % | | 78.2 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- (1)
- $1,627.0 million in carrying value served as collateral for the Company's consolidated CDO financing transactions and the remainder is unleveraged.
- (2)
- Includes ten loans with an aggregate carrying value of $67.8 million on non-accrual status, which were primarily first mortgage loans. Three of these loans are classified as non-performing. Non-accrual excludes $94.5 million carrying value of loans where the Company does not recognize interest income on the accrual rate but does recognize interest income based on the current rate.
35
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
7. Real Estate Debt Investments (Continued)
- (3)
- Based on principal amount.
- (4)
- $139.8 million principal amount of the Company's CRE debt investments have a weighted average LIBOR floor of 3.79%.
- (5)
- Based on initial maturity and for floating-rate debt, calculated using one-month LIBOR as of December 31, 2011, and for debt with a LIBOR floor, using such floor.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company originated seven loans and acquired three loans with an aggregate principal amount of $227.4 million (including two interests owned through joint ventures). The weighted average expected return on invested equity of these debt investments is approximately 18%, including the impact of the Company's CMBS financing transaction which priced in October 2012 (refer to Note 18). In addition, the Company opportunistically made two additional loan originations with an aggregate principal amount of $67.0 million with a weighted average expected return on invested equity of approximately 16%. There is no assurance the Company will realize these expected returns on invested equity over the term of these investments. The Company's actual return on invested equity could vary significantly from its expectations.
For the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company sold one loan for a realized gain of $0.2 million and three loans for a realized gain of $18.4 million, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company sold three loans for a realized gain of $0.8 million and eight loans for a realized gain of $71.5 million, respectively.
Maturities of CRE debt investments based on principal amount as of September 30, 2012 are as follows (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | |
| | Initial Maturity | | Maturity Including Extensions | |
---|
Delinquent | | $ | 22,500 | | $ | 22,500 | |
October 1 - December 31, 2012 | | | 190,302 | | | 119,302 | |
Years Ending December 31: | | | | | | | |
2013 | | | 293,063 | | | 253,113 | |
2014 | | | 678,039 | | | 296,423 | |
2015 | | | 594,265 | | | 574,628 | |
2016 | | | 233,829 | | | 435,564 | |
Thereafter | | | 438,612 | | | 749,080 | |
| | | | | |
Total | | $ | 2,450,610 | | $ | 2,450,610 | |
| | | | | |
The aggregate carrying value of delinquent loans due to a maturity default was $2.2 million as of September 30, 2012. The weighted average maturity including extensions of the CRE debt investments is 3.8 years.
Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because certain borrowers have the right to prepay with or without prepayment penalties and the Company may also extend contractual maturities in connection with loan modifications. The contractual amounts differ from the carrying values due to unamortized origination fees and costs, unamortized premiums and discounts and loan loss reserves being reported as part of the carrying value of the investment. As of September 30, 2012, the Company had $447.0 million of unamortized discounts ($378.9 million related to the CSE CDO)
36
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
7. Real Estate Debt Investments (Continued)
and $4.9 million of unamortized origination fees and costs. Maturity Including Extensions in the table above assumes that all debt with extension options will qualify for extension at initial maturity according to the conditions stipulated in the related debt agreements.
In July 2010, in connection with the acquisition of the equity interests in the CSE CDO, the Company consolidated certain CRE debt investments with deteriorated credit quality. As of September 30, 2012, such debt had an aggregate principal amount of $168.6 million and an aggregate carrying value of $47.0 million, of which $51.8 million of the remaining discount will be accreted. The change in the carrying value for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was primarily due to payoffs and changes to estimated recoverable amounts.
The following table presents the status of the Company's loan portfolio (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Carrying Value as of September 30, 2012 | | Carrying Value as of December 31, 2011 | |
---|
| | Number | | All Other Loans | | Number | | Non- Performing Loans | | Total(1) | | Number | | All Other Loans | | Number | | Non- Performing Loans | | Total(1) | |
---|
Class of Debt: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
First mortgage loans | | | 75 | | $ | 1,198,519 | | | 2 | | $ | 15,034 | | $ | 1,213,553 | | | 73 | | $ | 1,103,839 | | | 2 | | $ | 12,500 | | $ | 1,116,339 | |
Mezzanine loans | | | 18 | | | 443,062 | | | — | | | — | | | 443,062 | | | 17 | | | 426,742 | | | — | | | — | | | 426,742 | |
Subordinate mortgage interests | | | 7 | | | 117,790 | | | 1 | | | 10,000 | | | 127,790 | | | 7 | | | 116,663 | | | 2 | | | 38,462 | | | 155,125 | |
Credit tenant loans and other notes | | | 51 | | | 124,576 | | | — | | | — | | | 124,576 | | | 55 | | | 140,342 | | | — | | | — | | | 140,342 | |
Term loans | | | 4 | | | 89,726 | | | — | | | — | | | 89,726 | | | 6 | | | 59,818 | | | — | | | — | | | 59,818 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total real estate debt investments | | | 155 | | | 1,973,673 | | | 3 | | | 25,034 | | | 1,998,707 | | | 158 | | | 1,847,404 | | | 4 | | | 50,962 | | | 1,898,366 | |
Loan loss reserves | | | 12 | | | (147,336 | ) | | 3 | | | (21,323 | ) | | (168,659 | ) | | 15 | | | (139,001 | ) | | 3 | | | (48,783 | ) | | (187,784 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total real estate debt investments, net | | | | | $ | 1,826,337 | | | | | $ | 3,711 | | $ | 1,830,048 | | | | | $ | 1,708,403 | | | | | $ | 2,179 | | $ | 1,710,582 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Company's maximum exposure to loss related to the non-performing loans as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 is $3.7 million and $2.2 million, respectively.
Provision for Loan Losses
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company recorded $6.4 million and $19.7 million of provision for loan losses related to two and six loans, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company recorded $9.3 million and $48.0 million of provision for loan losses related to three and 11 loans, respectively.
37
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
7. Real Estate Debt Investments (Continued)
Activity in loan loss reserves on CRE debt investments for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 is as follows (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
---|
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 | |
---|
Beginning balance | | $ | 172,034 | | $ | 181,844 | | $ | 187,784 | | $ | 197,200 | |
Provision for loan losses | | | 6,360 | | | 9,340 | | | 19,737 | | | 48,040 | |
Transfers to REO | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (20,920 | ) |
Sales | | | — | | | — | | | (667 | ) | | — | |
Write-offs | | | (9,735 | ) | | — | | | (38,195 | ) | | (33,136 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Ending balance | | $ | 168,659 | | $ | 191,184 | | $ | 168,659 | | $ | 191,184 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Credit Quality Monitoring
The Company's CRE debt investments are typically secured by direct senior priority liens on real estate properties or by interests in entities that directly own real estate properties, which serve as the primary source of cash for the payment of principal and interest. The Company evaluates its debt investments at least quarterly and differentiates the relative credit quality principally based upon: (i) whether the borrower is currently paying contractual debt service in accordance with its contractual terms and (ii) whether the Company believes the borrower will be able to perform under its contractual terms in the future, as well as the Company's expectations as to the ultimate recovery of principal at maturity.
The Company categorizes debt investments for which it expects to receive full payment of contractual principal and interest payments as a "loan with no loan loss reserve." The Company categorizes a debt investment as a non-performing loan ("NPL") if it is in maturity default and/or past due at least 90 days on its contractual debt service payments. The Company considers the remaining debt investments to be of weaker credit quality and categorizes such loans as "other loans with a loan loss reserve/non-accrual status." These loans are not considered a NPL because such loans are performing in accordance with contractual terms but the loans have a loan loss reserve and/or are on non-accrual status. Even if a borrower is currently paying contractual debt service or debt service is not due in accordance with its contractual terms, the Company may still determine that the borrower may not be able to perform under its contractual terms in the future and make full payment upon maturity. The Company's definition of an NPL may differ from that of other companies that track NPLs.
38
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
7. Real Estate Debt Investments (Continued)
The following table presents the carrying value of the CRE debt investments, by credit quality indicator, as of each applicable balance sheet date (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | |
Credit Quality Indicator: | | September 30, 2012 | | December 31, 2011 | |
---|
Loans with no loan loss reserve: | | | | | | | |
First mortgage loans | | $ | 1,113,402 | | $ | 1,021,841 | |
Mezzanine loans | | | 188,078 | | | 155,787 | |
Subordinate mortgage interests | | | 95,691 | | | 94,564 | |
Credit tenant loans and other notes | | | 124,576 | | | 140,342 | |
Term loans | | | 53,218 | | | 17,247 | |
| | | | | |
Subtotal | | | 1,574,965 | | | 1,429,781 | |
Other loans with a loan loss reserve/non-accrual status:(1) | | | | | | | |
First mortgage loans | | | 74,667 | | | 70,938 | |
Mezzanine loans | | | 154,947 | | | 178,530 | |
Subordinate mortgage interests | | | — | | | 2,000 | |
Term loans | | | 21,758 | | | 27,154 | |
| | | | | |
Subtotal | | | 251,372 | | | 278,622 | |
Non-performing loans: | | | | | | | |
First mortgage loans | | | 3,711 | | | 2,177 | |
Subordinate mortgage interests | | | — | | | 2 | |
| | | | | |
Subtotal | | | 3,711 | | | 2,179 | |
| | | | | |
Total | | $ | 1,830,048 | | $ | 1,710,582 | |
| | | | | |
- (1)
- Includes five loans with a 100% loan loss reserve representing an aggregate principal amount of $46.0 million for both periods. These loans are not considered NPLs as debt service is currently being received or debt service is not contractually due until maturity.
Impaired Loans
The Company considers impaired loans to generally include NPLs, loans with a loan loss reserve, loans on non-accrual status (excluding loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality) and TDRs.
39
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
7. Real Estate Debt Investments (Continued)
As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, impaired loans are comprised of the following (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2012(2) | | December 31, 2011(3) | |
---|
| | Number | | Principal Amount(1) | | Carrying Value(1) | | Loan Loss Reserve | | Number | | Principal Amount(1) | | Carrying Value(1) | | Loan Loss Reserve | |
---|
Class of Debt: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
First mortgage loans | | | 9 | | $ | 146,590 | | $ | 109,719 | | $ | 21,773 | | | 6 | | $ | 94,697 | | $ | 73,116 | | $ | 21,383 | |
Mezzanine loans | | | 9 | | | 265,241 | | | 165,193 | | | 100,036 | | | 9 | | | 270,982 | | | 178,530 | | | 92,424 | |
Subordinate mortgage interests | | | 3 | | | 32,100 | | | — | | | 32,100 | | | 4 | | | 60,562 | | | 2,001 | | | 58,560 | |
Term loans | | | 1 | | | 45,550 | | | 21,758 | | | 14,750 | | | 2 | | | 51,613 | | | 27,154 | | | 15,417 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 22 | | $ | 489,481 | | $ | 296,670 | | $ | 168,659 | | | 21 | | $ | 477,854 | | $ | 280,801 | | $ | 187,784 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- (1)
- Principal amount differs from carrying value due to unamortized origination fees and costs, unamortized premium/discount and loan loss reserves included in the carrying value of the investment.
- (2)
- Includes two non-accrual loans (also considered TDRs) with an aggregate carrying value of $23.9 million and five loans considered TDRs with an aggregate carrying value of $41.5 million, all of which do not have loan loss reserves. Excludes one loan acquired with deteriorated credit quality with a carrying value of $14.0 million that is on non-accrual status and does not have a loan loss reserve. These are primarily first mortgage loans.
- (3)
- Includes three non-accrual loans with an aggregate carrying value of $24.0 million that do not have loan loss reserves. Excludes two loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality with an aggregate carrying value of $18.6 million that are on non-accrual status and do not have loan loss reserves. These are all first mortgage loans.
The following table presents the Company's average carrying value of impaired loans by type and the income recorded on such loans subsequent to their being deemed impaired for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2012 | | September 30, 2011 | |
---|
| | Number | | Average Carrying Value | | Three Months Ended Income | | Number | | Average Carrying Value | | Three Months Ended Income | |
---|
Class of Debt: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
First mortgage loans | | | 9 | | $ | 110,961 | | $ | 275 | | | 5 | | $ | 69,884 | | $ | 109 | |
Mezzanine loans | | | 9 | | | 166,125 | | | 1,894 | | | 12 | | | 199,085 | | | 2,863 | |
Subordinate mortgage interests | | | 3 | | | 375 | | | 3 | | | 4 | | | 5,426 | | | 184 | |
Term loans | | | 1 | | | 21,758 | | | 914 | | | 2 | | | 27,154 | | | 1,037 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total/weighted average | | | 22 | | $ | 299,219 | | $ | 3,086 | | | 23 | | $ | 301,549 | | $ | 4,193 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
40
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
7. Real Estate Debt Investments (Continued)
The following table presents the Company's average carrying value of impaired loans by type and the income recorded on such loans subsequent to their being deemed impaired for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2012 | | September 30, 2011 | |
---|
| | Number | | Average Carrying Value | | Nine Months Ended Income | | Number | | Average Carrying Value | | Nine Months Ended Income | |
---|
Class of Debt: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
First mortgage loans | | | 9 | | $ | 100,503 | | $ | 942 | | | 5 | | $ | 63,993 | | $ | 180 | |
Mezzanine loans | | | 9 | | | 171,942 | | | 5,909 | | | 12 | | | 158,599 | | | 8,509 | |
Subordinate mortgage interests | | | 3 | | | 7,518 | | | 47 | | | 4 | | | 9,724 | | | 521 | |
Term loans | | | 1 | | | 24,456 | | | 2,721 | | | 2 | | | 27,154 | | | 3,078 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total/weighted average | | | 22 | | $ | 304,419 | | $ | 9,619 | | | 23 | | $ | 259,470 | | $ | 12,288 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As of September 30, 2012, the Company had one first mortgage loan with a principal amount of $12.5 million past due greater than 90 days and one subordinate mortgage interest with a principal amount of $10.0 million past due between 30 and 60 days. As of December 31, 2011, the Company had one subordinated mortgage interest with a principal amount of $10.0 million past due less than 30 days and one first mortgage loan with a principal amount of $12.5 million and one subordinated mortgage interest with a principal amount of $28.5 million past due greater than 90 days. These amounts exclude non-accrual loans discussed in the charts above.
Troubled Debt Restructurings
The following table presents CRE debt investments that were modified during the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 and considered a TDR (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2012 | | September 30, 2011 | |
---|
| | Number | | Carrying Value | | Original WA Interest Rate | | Modified WA Interest Rate | | Number | | Carrying Value | | Original WA Interest Rate | | Modified WA Interest Rate | |
---|
Class of Debt: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
First mortgage loans | | | 1 | | $ | 9,996 | (1) | | 3.42 | % | | 0.99 | %(1) | | — | | $ | — | | | — | | | — | |
Mezzanine loans | | | 1 | | | 6,345 | (2) | | 2.50 | % | | 0.00% | (2) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Subordinate mortgage interests | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1 | | | 5,000 | | | 3.00 | % | | 1.00 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total/weighted average | | | 2 | | $ | 16,341 | | | 3.06 | % | | 0.61 | % | | 1 | | $ | 5,000 | | | 3.00 | % | | 1.00 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- (1)
- The loan was modified into a senior and subordinate note with a modified rate of LIBOR plus 2.50% and LIBOR plus 0.25%, respectively.
- (2)
- The loan was modified into a mezzanine loan and preferred equity interest with a modified rate of LIBOR plus 10% and 7%, respectively, however, interest will be deferred until certain hurdles are met.
41
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
7. Real Estate Debt Investments (Continued)
The following table presents CRE debt investments that were modified during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 and considered a TDR (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2012 | | September 30, 2011 | |
---|
| | Number(1) | | Carrying Value | | Original WA Interest Rate | | Modified WA Interest Rate | | Number | | Carrying Value | | Original WA Interest Rate | | Modified WA Interest Rate | |
---|
Class of Debt: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
First mortgage loans | | | 4 | | $ | 31,410 | (1) | | 2.68 | % | | 2.60 | % | | 2 | (2) | $ | 62,871 | (2) | | 4.93 | % | | 0.33 | % |
Mezzanine loans | | | 1 | | | 6,345 | | | 2.50 | % | | 0.00% | (3) | | 2 | | | 45,847 | | | 2.60 | % | | 0.24 | % |
Subordinate mortgage interests | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1 | | | 5,000 | | | 3.00 | % | | 1.00 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total/weighted average | | | 5 | | $ | 37,755 | | | 2.65 | % | | 2.17 | % | | 5 | | $ | 113,718 | | | 3.90 | % | | 0.32 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- (1)
- In the second quarter 2012, the Company took title to a property associated with a loan with a carrying value of $6.1 million that was considered a TDR in the first quarter 2012.
- (2)
- One loan with a carrying value of $44.7 million experienced an interest payment default prior to modification in 2011.
- (3)
- The loan was modified into a mezzanine loan and preferred equity interest with a modified rate of LIBOR plus 10% and 7%, respectively, however, interest will be deferred until certain hurdles are met.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company had one CRE debt investment where the Company took title to the property and was considered to be a TDR. The carrying value of such loan at the time of taking title was $13.4 million. This REO is not included in the table above.
All loans modified in a TDR generally provided interest rate concessions and/or deferral of principal repayments. Any loan modification is intended to maximize the collection of the principal and interest related to such loan.
8. Investment in and Advances to Unconsolidated Ventures
The Company has non-controlling, unconsolidated ownership interests in entities that are generally accounted for using the equity method. Capital contributions, distributions and profits and losses of such entities are allocated in accordance with the terms of the applicable partnership and limited liability company agreements. Such allocations may differ from the stated percentage interests, if any, in such entities as a result of preferred returns and allocation formulas as described in such agreements. The Company may account for such investments using the cost method if the Company does not maintain significant influence over the unconsolidated entity. All of the below investments are accounted for under the equity method.
Meadowlands
The Company owns a $109.7 million interest in Meadowlands Two, LLC, which holds 100% of Meadowlands One, LLC, which is secured by a retail/entertainment complex located in East Rutherford, New Jersey (the "NJ Property"). During the third quarter 2010, the lender group took effective ownership of the NJ Property. As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the carrying
42
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
8. Investment in and Advances to Unconsolidated Ventures (Continued)
value of the Company's 22% investment in the NJ Property was $65.2 million and $65.5 million, respectively. For the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company recognized equity in losses of $0.4 million and $0.5 million, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company recognized equity in losses of $1.2 million and $8.6 million including a provision for loss on equity investment of $4.5 million in the first quarter 2011.
LandCap Partners
On October 5, 2007, the Company entered into a joint venture with Whitehall Street Global Real Estate Limited Partnership 2007 ("Whitehall") to form LandCap Partners and LandCap LoanCo. (collectively referred to as "LandCap"). LandCap was established to opportunistically invest in single-family residential land through land loans, lot option agreements and select land purchases. The joint venture is managed by a third-party management group which has extensive experience in the single family housing sector. The Company and Whitehall agreed to provide no additional new investment capital in the LandCap joint venture. As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company's 49% interest in LandCap was $14.1 million and $14.4 million, respectively. As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, LandCap had investments totaling $32.4 million and $34.0 million, respectively. For the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company recognized equity in earnings of $0.1 million and equity in losses of $0.3 million, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company recognized equity in losses of $0.6 million and $1.0 million, respectively.
CS Federal Drive, LLC
In February 2006, the Company, through a joint venture with an institutional investor, CS Federal Drive, LLC ("CS/Federal"), acquired a portfolio of three adjacent class A office/flex buildings located in Colorado Springs, Colorado for $54.3 million. The joint venture financed the transaction with two non-recourse, mortgage notes totaling $38.0 million and the remainder in cash. The borrowings mature on February 11, 2016 and bear fixed interest rates of 5.51% and 5.46%, respectively. The Company contributed $8.4 million for a 50% interest in the joint venture and incurred $0.3 million in costs related to its acquisition, which are capitalized to the investment. These costs are amortized over the useful lives of the assets held by the joint venture. As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had an investment in CS/Federal of $5.4 million and $5.7 million, respectively. For the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company recognized equity in earnings of $0.2 million and $0.2 million, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company recognized equity in earnings of $0.6 million and $0.5 million, respectively.
43
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
8. Investment in and Advances to Unconsolidated Ventures (Continued)
NorthStar Real Estate Income Trust, Inc.
The Company sponsors NorthStar Income, a CRE debt-oriented REIT. As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had an investment of $6.2 million and $4.0 million, respectively, in NorthStar Income representing an interest of 1.4% and 2.5%, respectively. For the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company recognized $0.1 million and an immaterial amount in equity in earnings, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company recognized $0.2 million and an immaterial amount in equity in earnings, respectively.
NorthStar Real Estate Securities Opportunity Fund
A subsidiary of the Company, as general partner of NorthStar Real Estate Securities Opportunity Fund ("Securities Fund"), liquidated the Securities Fund in 2011. The Company owned a 34.3% interest in Securities Fund. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company recognized an immaterial amount of equity in losses.
Other
In May 2012, the Company acquired a 9.8% interest in a joint venture that owns a pari passu participation in a first mortgage loan secured by a portfolio of luxury residences located in resort destinations. The Company owns an additional interest in the same loan through the CSE CDO with a carrying value of $11.6 million as of September 30, 2012. As of September 30, 2012, the Company had an investment of $5.5 million in this joint venture. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company recognized $0.1 million and $0.4 million in equity in earnings, respectively.
In August 2012, the Company acquired a 33.3% interest in a joint venture that owns a pari passu participation in a first mortgage loan secured by an office building in Brooklyn, New York. As of September 30, 2012, the Company had an investment of $11.0 million in this joint venture. For the three months ended September 30, 2012, the Company recognized $0.2 million in equity in earnings.
44
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
9. Borrowings
The Company's outstanding borrowings as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are as follows (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| |
| |
| | September 30, 2012 | | December 31, 2011 | |
---|
| | Recourse vs. Non-Recourse | | Final Stated Maturity | | Contractual Interest Rate(1) | | Principal Amount | | Carrying Value(2) | | Principal Amount | | Carrying Value(2) | |
---|
VIE Financing Structures: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CDO bonds payable: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
N-Star I | | Non-recourse | | Aug-38 | | LIBOR + 2.63%(3) | | $ | 128,588 | | $ | 121,294 | | $ | 171,178 | | $ | 154,110 | |
N-Star II | | Non-recourse | | Jun-39 | | LIBOR + 1.69%(3) | | | 97,348 | | | 82,573 | | | 149,438 | | | 103,475 | |
N-Star III | | Non-recourse | | Jun-40 | | LIBOR + 0.81%(3) | | | 169,521 | | | 72,480 | | | 274,454 | | | 129,537 | |
N-Star IV | | Non-recourse | | Jul-40 | | LIBOR + 0.59%(3) | | | 195,643 | | | 140,060 | | | 232,749 | | | 157,862 | |
N-Star V | | Non-recourse | | Sep-45 | | LIBOR + 0.69%(3) | | | 276,247 | | | 112,105 | | | 327,463 | | | 126,251 | |
N-Star VI | | Non-recourse | | Jun-41 | | LIBOR + 0.50%(3) | | | 262,253 | | | 201,182 | | | 278,049 | | | 184,552 | |
N-Star VII | | Non-recourse | | Jun-51 | | LIBOR + 0.38%(3) | | | 263,444 | | | 105,888 | | | 425,580 | | | 180,155 | |
N-Star VIII | | Non-recourse | | Feb-41 | | LIBOR + 0.42%(3) | | | 542,452 | | | 376,704 | | | 583,050 | | | 353,684 | |
N-Star IX | | Non-recourse | | Aug-52 | | LIBOR + 0.40%(3) | | | 679,068 | | | 241,373 | | | 682,980 | | | 228,704 | |
CSE CDO | | Non-recourse | | Jan-37 | | LIBOR + 0.38%(3) | | | 714,230 | | | 536,570 | | | 850,235 | | | 526,909 | |
CapLease CDO | | Non-recourse | | Jan-40 | | 4.94%(4) | | | 134,161 | | | 114,553 | | | 150,593 | | | 128,668 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal CDO bonds payable | | | | | | | | | 3,462,955 | | | 2,104,782 | | | 4,125,769 | | | 2,273,907 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage notes payable:(5) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Phoenix, AZ | | Non-recourse | | May-17 | | 4.25% | | | 211,921 | | | 211,921 | | | 212,000 | | | 212,000 | |
San Antonio, TX(6) | | Non-recourse | | Jan-19 | | 4.44% | | | 16,525 | | | 16,525 | | | 16,525 | | | 16,525 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal Mortgage notes payable | | | | | | | | | 228,446 | | | 228,446 | | | 228,525 | | | 228,525 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Secured term loan: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
TALF | | Non-recourse | | Oct-14 | | 3.64% | | | 14,682 | | | 14,682 | | | 14,682 | | | 14,682 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal Secured term loan | | | | | | | | | 14,682 | | | 14,682 | | | 14,682 | | | 14,682 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total VIE financing structures | | | | | | | | | 3,706,083 | | | 2,347,910 | | | 4,368,976 | | | 2,517,114 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Non-VIE Financing Structures: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage notes payable:(5) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Core net lease | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
South Portland, ME | | Non-recourse | | Jun-14 | | 7.34% | | | 4,107 | | | 4,107 | | | 4,266 | | | 4,266 | |
Fort Wayne, IN | | Non-recourse | | Jan-15 | | 6.41% | | | 3,149 | | | 3,149 | | | 3,221 | | | 3,221 | |
Reading, PA | | Non-recourse | | Jan-15 | | 5.58% | | | 13,148 | | | 13,148 | | | 13,366 | | | 13,366 | |
Reading, PA | | Non-recourse | | Jan-15 | | 6.00% | | | 5,000 | | | 5,000 | | | 5,000 | | | 5,000 | |
EDS Portfolio | | Non-recourse | | Oct-15 | | 5.37% | | | 44,793 | | | 44,793 | | | 45,416 | | | 45,416 | |
Keene, NH | | Non-recourse | | Feb-16 | | 5.85% | | | 6,392 | | | 6,392 | | | 6,478 | | | 6,478 | |
Green Pond, NJ | | Non-recourse | | Apr-16 | | 5.68% | | | 16,442 | | | 16,442 | | | 16,635 | | | 16,635 | |
Aurora, CO | | Non-recourse | | Jul-16 | | 6.22% | | | 31,830 | | | 31,830 | | | 32,159 | | | 32,159 | |
DSG Portfolio | | Non-recourse | | Oct-16 | | 6.17% | | | 32,434 | | | 32,434 | | | 32,823 | | | 32,823 | |
Indianapolis, IN | | Non-recourse | | Feb-17 | | 6.06% | | | 27,125 | | | 27,125 | | | 27,416 | | | 27,416 | |
Milpitas, CA | | Non-recourse | | Mar-17 | | 5.95% | | | 20,752 | | | 20,752 | | | 21,141 | | | 21,141 | |
Fort Mill, SC | | Non-recourse | | Apr-17 | | 5.63% | | | 27,700 | | | 27,700 | | | 27,700 | | | 27,700 | |
Fort Mill, SC | | Non-recourse | | Apr-17 | | 6.21% | | | 1,914 | | | 1,914 | | | 2,162 | | | 2,162 | |
Salt Lake City, UT | | Non-recourse | | Sep-17(7) | | 5.16% | | | 14,287 | | | 14,287 | | | 14,625 | | | 14,625 | |
Columbus, OH | | Non-recourse | | Dec-17 | | 6.48% | | | 22,726 | | | 22,726 | | | 22,937 | | | 22,937 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal Core net lease | | | | | | | | | 271,799 | | | 271,799 | | | 275,345 | | | 275,345 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Healthcare net lease | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hillsboro, OR | | Non-recourse | | Jan-14 | | 5.94% | | | 31,769 | | | 31,769 | | | 32,104 | | | 32,104 | |
Wakefield Portfolio | | Non-recourse | | May-15 | | LIBOR + 5.95%(8) | | | 56,935 | | | 56,935 | | | 57,589 | | | 57,589 | |
Ohio Portfolio | | Non-recourse | | Mar-16 | | 6.00% | | | 20,804 | | | 20,804 | | | 20,921 | | | 20,921 | |
Lancaster, OH | | Non-recourse | | Mar-16 | | LIBOR + 5.00%(9) | | | 4,466 | | | 4,466 | | | — | | | — | |
Wilkinson Portfolio | | Non-recourse | | Jan-17 | | 6.99% | | | 155,921 | | | 155,921 | | | 157,688 | | | 157,688 | |
Tuscola/Harrisburg | | Non-recourse | | Jan-17 | | 7.09% | | | 7,696 | | | 7,696 | | | 7,781 | | | 7,781 | |
East Arlington, TX | | Non-recourse | | May-17 | | 5.89% | | | 3,271 | | | 3,271 | | | 3,304 | | | 3,304 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal Healthcare net lease | | | | | | | | | 280,862 | | | 280,862 | | | 279,387 | | | 279,387 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal Mortgage notes payable | | | | | | | | | 552,661 | | | 552,661 | | | 554,732 | | | 554,732 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Credit facilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CMBS Facility | | Recourse | | Oct-14(10) | | 1.65%(11) | | | 40,348 | | | 40,348 | | | 64,259 | | | 64,259 | |
Loan Facility 1 | | Partial Recourse(12) | | Nov-15(13) | | 2.57%(14) | | | 84,948 | | | 84,948 | | | — | | | — | |
Loan Facility 2 | | Non-recourse | | Jul-18(15) | | 4.58%(16) | | | 24,850 | | | 24,850 | | | — | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal Credit facilities | | | | | | | | | 150,146 | | | 150,146 | | | 64,259 | | | 64,259 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Exchangeable senior notes:(17) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
11.50% Notes | | Recourse | | Jun-13 | | 11.50% | | | 35,710 | | | 35,553 | | | 35,710 | | | 35,389 | |
45
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
9. Borrowings (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| |
| |
| | September 30, 2012 | | December 31, 2011 | |
---|
| | Recourse vs. Non-Recourse | | Final Stated Maturity | | Contractual Interest Rate(1) | | Principal Amount | | Carrying Value(2) | | Principal Amount | | Carrying Value(2) | |
---|
7.25% Notes | | Recourse | | Jun-27(18) | | 7.25% | | | 12,955 | | | 12,955 | | | 20,455 | | | 20,396 | |
7.50% Notes | | Recourse | | Mar-31(19) | | 7.50% | | | 172,500 | | | 161,939 | | | 172,500 | | | 160,068 | |
8.875% Notes | | Recourse | | Jun-32(20) | | 8.875% | | | 82,000 | | | 79,809 | | | — | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal Exchangeable senior notes | | | | | | | | | 303,165 | | | 290,256 | | | 228,665 | | | 215,853 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Junior subordinated notes:(21) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Trust I | | Recourse | | Mar-35 | | 8.15% | | | 41,240 | | | 29,487 | | | 41,240 | | | 25,569 | |
Trust II | | Recourse | | Jun-35 | | 7.74% | | | 25,780 | | | 18,433 | | | 25,780 | | | 15,984 | |
Trust III | | Recourse | | Jan-36 | | 7.81% | | | 41,238 | | | 29,485 | | | 41,238 | | | 25,155 | |
Trust IV | | Recourse | | Jun-36 | | 7.95% | | | 50,100 | | | 35,821 | | | 50,100 | | | 30,561 | |
Trust V | | Recourse | | Sep-36 | | LIBOR + 2.70% | | | 30,100 | | | 17,007 | | | 30,100 | | | 14,749 | |
Trust VI | | Recourse | | Dec-36 | | LIBOR + 2.90% | | | 25,100 | | | 14,558 | | | 25,100 | | | 12,676 | |
Trust VII | | Recourse | | Apr-37 | | LIBOR + 2.50% | | | 31,459 | | | 17,302 | | | 31,459 | | | 15,100 | |
Trust VIII | | Recourse | | Jul-37 | | LIBOR + 2.70% | | | 35,100 | | | 20,007 | | | 35,100 | | | 17,374 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal Junior subordinated notes | | | | | | | | | 280,117 | | | 182,100 | | | 280,117 | | | 157,168 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Non-VIE financing structures | | | | | | | | | 1,286,089 | | | 1,175,163 | | | 1,127,773 | | | 992,012 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Grand Total | | | | | | | | $ | 4,992,172 | | $ | 3,523,073 | | $ | 5,496,749 | | $ | 3,509,126 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- (1)
- Refer to Note 14 regarding the Company's derivative instruments which are used to manage interest rate exposure.
- (2)
- Carrying value represents fair value with respect to CDO bonds payable (excluding CapLease CDO bonds payable for which the fair value option was not elected) and junior subordinated notes due to the election of the fair value option (see Note 4) and amortized cost with regards to the other borrowings.
- (3)
- Represents a weighted average spread. N-Star CDOs I and VI and CSE CDO are based on three-month LIBOR whereas all others are based on one-month LIBOR.
- (4)
- Represents a weighted average coupon.
- (5)
- Mortgage notes payable are subject to customary non-recourse carveouts.
- (6)
- In connection with this borrowing, the borrower is a special purpose entity separate from the Company and its affiliates, and as a result, the borrower's assets and credit are not available to satisfy the liabilities and the obligations of the Company or any of its other affiliates.
- (7)
- Maturity expected to be extended subsequent to quarter end.
- (8)
- Contractual interest rate is based on three-month LIBOR with a 1.0% LIBOR floor.
- (9)
- Contractual interest rate is based on one-month LIBOR with a 1.0% LIBOR floor.
- (10)
- The initial maturity date is October 28, 2013, subject to a one-year extension at the option of the Company, which may be exercised upon the satisfaction of certain customary conditions set forth in the agreement.
- (11)
- Contractual interest rate equals a per annum pricing rate of 1.65%, subject to adjustment. The Company paid an upfront fee of 0.5% based on the total commitment and will not incur any non-utilization fees.
- (12)
- This facility is recourse solely with respect to 25% of "core" assets and 100% of "flex" assets, which may only represent 25% of the total credit facility, as such terms are defined in the governing documents.
- (13)
- The initial maturity date is November 22, 2013, subject to two one-year extensions at the option of the Company, which may be exercised upon the satisfaction of certain customary conditions set forth in the agreement.
- (14)
- Represents the weighted average contractual interest rate as of September 30, 2012. Contractual interest rate varies based on collateral type and ranges from three-month LIBOR plus 2.25% to 3.00%. The Company has also incurred an immaterial amount of non-utilization fees.
- (15)
- The initial maturity date is July 30, 2015, with three, one-year extensions at the Company's option, which may be exercised upon the satisfaction of certain customary conditions set forth in the agreement.
- (16)
- Represents the weighted average contractual interest rate as of September 30, 2012. Contractual interest rate varies based on the asset type and characteristics and ranges from one-month LIBOR plus 3.95% to 5.95%.
- (17)
- Principal amount differs from carrying value on the consolidated balance sheets due to the equity component of the notes.
- (18)
- The holders have repurchase rights which may require the Company to repurchase the notes on June 15, 2014.
- (19)
- The holders have repurchase rights which may require the Company to repurchase the notes on March 15, 2016.
- (20)
- The holders have repurchase rights which may require the Company to repurchase the notes on June 15, 2019.
- (21)
- Junior subordinate notes Trusts I, II, III and IV have a fixed interest rate for the first ten years after which the interest rate will float and reset quarterly at rates ranging from three-month LIBOR plus 2.50% to 2.90%.
46
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
9. Borrowings (Continued)
Scheduled principal on the Company's borrowings, based on final stated maturity, is as follows as of September 30, 2012 (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total | | CDO Bonds Payable | | Mortgage Notes Payable | | Credit Facilities | | Secured Term Loan | | Exchangeable Senior Notes(1) | | Junior Subordinated Notes | |
---|
October 1 - December 31, 2012 | | $ | 2,291 | | $ | — | | $ | 2,291 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
2013 | | | 45,573 | | | — | | | 9,863 | | | — | | | — | | | 35,710 | | | — | |
2014 | | | 112,739 | | | — | | | 44,754 | | | 40,348 | | | 14,682 | | | 12,955 | | | — | |
2015 | | | 210,658 | | | — | | | 125,710 | | | 84,948 | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
2016 | | | 285,111 | | | — | | | 112,611 | | | — | | | — | | | 172,500 | | | — | |
Thereafter | | | 4,335,800 | | | 3,462,955 | | | 485,878 | | | 24,850 | | | — | | | 82,000 | | | 280,117 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 4,992,172 | | $ | 3,462,955 | | $ | 781,107 | | $ | 150,146 | | $ | 14,682 | | $ | 303,165 | | $ | 280,117 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- (1)
- The 7.25% Notes, 7.50% Notes and 8.875% Notes have a final maturity date of June 15, 2027, March 15, 2031 and June 15, 2032, respectively. The above table reflects the holders' repurchase rights which may require the Company to repurchase the 7.25% Notes, 7.50% Notes and 8.875% Notes on June 15, 2014, March 15, 2016 and June 15, 2019, respectively.
Exchangeable Senior Notes
In June 2012, the Operating Partnership issued $75.0 million of 8.875% exchangeable senior notes ("8.875% Notes") which were offered in accordance with Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, for net proceeds of $72.0 million. The 8.875% Notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Operating Partnership. The 8.875% Notes have an initial exchange rate representing an exchange price of $6.00 per share of the Company's common stock, subject to adjustment under certain circumstances, and may be exchangeable upon the occurrence of specified events, and at any time on or after June 15, 2019, and prior to the close of business on the second business day immediately preceding the maturity date, into cash or common stock of the Company, or a combination thereof, if any, at the Company's option.
On June 15, 2012, $7.5 million principal amount of the 7.25% Notes were redeemed by the Company at par. The next redemption date for the remaining 7.25% Notes will be June 15, 2014. On July 6, 2012, the underwriters exercised their over-allotment option resulting in the issuance of an additional $7.0 million of the 8.875% Notes for net proceeds of $6.8 million.
Mortgage Note Payable
On January 27, 2012, the Company acquired a 71-unit independent living facility located in Lancaster, Ohio and contemporaneously entered into a borrowing agreement for $4.5 million. The borrowing bears interest at one-month LIBOR plus 5.0%, with a fixed minimum LIBOR of 1.0% and matures on March 30, 2016.
CMBS Facility
In October 2011, a subsidiary of the Company entered into a master repurchase and securities contract ("CMBS Facility") of $100.0 million to finance the acquisition of AAA-rated CMBS
47
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
9. Borrowings (Continued)
investments. In connection with the CMBS Facility, the Company, together with the Operating Partnership and NRFC Sub-REIT Corp. ("Sub-REIT") (collectively, the "CMBS Guarantors"), provided a guaranty agreement under which the CMBS Guarantors guarantee the obligations under the CMBS Facility. The CMBS Facility and related agreement contains representations, warranties, covenants, conditions precedent to funding, events of default and indemnities that are customary for agreements of this type.
As of September 30, 2012, the Company held $44.9 million principal amount of CMBS with a weighted average current yield of 3.9%, financed with $40.3 million at a weighted average financing cost over the expected life of 1.8%, resulting in an expected return on invested equity of approximately 19%. There is no assurance the Company will realize this expected return on invested equity over the term of these investments. The Company's actual return on invested equity could vary significantly from its expectations.
Loan Facilities
In November 2011, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company entered into a master repurchase and securities contract ("Loan Facility 1") of $100.0 million to finance the origination of CRE first mortgage loans. In connection with Loan Facility 1, the Company, together with the Operating Partnership, entered into a guaranty agreement, under which the Company and the Operating Partnership guarantee certain of the obligations under Loan Facility 1. Additionally, in connection with Loan Facility 1, the Sub-REIT provided a pledge and security agreement over its interests in the borrowing subsidiary of the Company. Loan Facility 1 and related agreements contain representations, warranties, covenants, conditions precedent to funding, events of default and indemnities that are customary for agreements of these types. In addition, the Company has agreed to guarantee certain obligations under Loan Facility 1 if the Company or an affiliate of the Company engage in certain customary bad acts.
Loan Facility 1 and the CMBS Facility contain liquidity covenants that require maintenance of an aggregate of $45 million of unrestricted cash to provide credit support for the borrowings. In addition, Loan Facility 1 and the CMBS Facility require the maintenance of a loan-to-collateral value ratio that may require the Company to provide additional collateral or make cash payments. As of September 30, 2012, the Company was not required to post additional collateral or make cash payments to maintain such ratios.
In July 2012, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a Credit and Security Agreement (the "Loan Facility 2") of $40.0 million on a non-recourse basis, subject to certain exceptions, to finance first mortgage loans and senior loan participations secured by commercial real estate. In connection with Loan Facility 2, the Operating Partnership agreed to guarantee interest payments and the obligations under Loan Facility 2 if either the Company or its affiliates engage in certain customary bad acts. In addition, the Operating Partnership pledged its interests in in the Company's borrowing subsidiary as collateral. Loan Facility 2 and related agreements contain representations, warranties, covenants, conditions precedent to funding, events of default and indemnities that are customary for agreements of these types. More specifically, the Operating Partnership must maintain at least $3.75 million and as much as $7.5 million in unrestricted cash, or other eligible investments, at all times during the term of Loan Facility 2.
48
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
9. Borrowings (Continued)
As of September 30, 2012, the Company held $179.2 million principal amount of loans financed with $109.8 million on the Company's loan facilities, resulting in an expected return on invested equity of approximately 18%. There is no assurance the Company will realize this expected return on invested equity over the term of these investments. The Company's actual return on invested equity could vary significantly from its expectations.
Summary of Credit Facilities
During the initial term, all of the credit facilities act as revolving credit facilities that can be paid down as assets payoff and re-drawn upon for new investments. As of September 30, 2012, the Company was in compliance with all of its financial covenants.
10. Related Party Transactions
Advisory and Other Fees
The Company has agreements with each of its N-Star CDOs and the CSE and CapLease CDOs to perform certain advisory services. The fee income related to all of the CDO financing transactions is eliminated as a result of the consolidation of the respective CDO financing transaction. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company earned $3.5 million and $11.0 million in fee income, respectively, that was eliminated in consolidation.
The Company has an agreement with NorthStar Income to manage its day-to-day affairs, including identifying, originating and acquiring investments on behalf of NorthStar Income and earns fees for its services. For the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company earned $1.5 million and $0.1 million of fees on this agreement, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company earned $4.8 million and $0.4 million, respectively. Additionally, the Company incurs direct and indirect costs on behalf of NorthStar Income and NorthStar Healthcare Income, Inc. ("NorthStar HealthCare") which are reimbursed subsequently to the Company by these managed entities. As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had aggregate unreimbursed costs of $8.3 million and $5.8 million, respectively, from NorthStar Income and NorthStar Healthcare. These amounts are recorded as receivables, related parties on the Company's consolidated balance sheets.
Purchase of Non-traded REIT Common Stock
The Company has committed to purchase up to $10 million of shares of NorthStar Income's common stock during the period through July 19, 2013, in the event that NorthStar Income's distributions to stockholders exceeds its modified funds from operations (as defined in accordance with the current practice guidelines issued by the Investment Program Association). In connection with this commitment, the Company purchased 254,778 shares for $2.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 resulting in 507,980 aggregate shares acquired for $4.6 million since inception. The Company has also committed to purchase up to $10 million of shares of NorthStar Healthcare's common stock on similar terms to NorthStar Income. As of September 30, 2012, the Company has not purchased shares of NorthStar Healthcare common stock related to this commitment.
49
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
10. Related Party Transactions (Continued)
Legacy Fund
The Company has two CRE debt investments with a subsidiary of Legacy Partners Realty Fund I, LLC (the "Legacy Fund"), as borrower. One loan of $15.8 million matures in March 2013 and has two one-year extension options. The interest rate is one-month LIBOR plus 7.50%, of which one-month LIBOR plus 3.00% is current pay. The other loan of $23.2 million matures in January 2015 and has an interest rate of one-month LIBOR plus 3.50%. The Company earned an aggregate of $0.5 million and $1.6 million of interest income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively. The Company earned an aggregate of $0.5 million and $1.4 million of interest income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. One of the Company's directors, Preston Butcher, is the chairman of the board of directors and chief executive officer and owns a significant interest in Legacy Partners Commercial, LLC, which indirectly owns an equity interest in, and owns the manager of, the Legacy Fund. In addition, the Company leases office space in Colorado with an affiliate of Legacy Fund under an operating lease with annual lease payments of approximately $0.1 million through December 31, 2015. The Company has the option to renew the lease for an additional five years.
Hard Rock Hotel Loan
The Company owns an $89.3 million principal amount of a mezzanine loan backed by the Hard Rock Hotel and Casino in Las Vegas, Nevada. Prior to a modification of the loan in March 2011, Morgans Hotel Group ("Morgans") was a minority partner in the joint venture owning the hotel. David Hamamoto, the Company's chairman and chief executive officer, is the executive chairman of the board of Morgans. Morgans no longer has any interest in the hotel.
11. Equity-Based Compensation
Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan
On September 14, 2004, the board of directors of the Company adopted the NorthStar Realty Finance Corp. 2004 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan and such plan, as amended and restated, was further adopted by the board of directors of the Company on April 18, 2012 and approved by the stockholders on May 24, 2012 (the "Stock Incentive Plan"). The Stock Incentive Plan provides for the issuance of stock-based incentive awards, including incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, shares of common stock of the Company, in the form of restricted shares and other equity-based awards such as OP Units which are structured as profits interests ("LTIP Units") or any combination of the foregoing. The eligible participants in the Stock Incentive Plan include directors, officers, employees, consultants and advisors of the Company.
An aggregate of 8,849,766 shares of common stock of the Company are currently reserved under the Stock Incentive Plan, subject to equitable adjustment upon the occurrence of certain corporate events. 6,122,552 LTIP Units have been issued, of which 1,982,083 LTIP Units remain subject to vesting. LTIP Unit holders are entitled to dividends on the entire grant beginning on the date of grant.
50
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
11. Equity-Based Compensation (Continued)
The following table presents the status of all of the LTIP Unit grants as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (units in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2012 | | December 31, 2011 | |
---|
| | LTIP Unit Grants(2) | | Weighted Average Grant Price | | LTIP Unit Grants | | Weighted Average Grant Price | |
---|
Beginning balance(1) | | | 4,208 | | $ | 7.53 | | | 4,289 | | $ | 7.92 | |
Granted | | | 2,306 | | | 4.86 | | | 631 | | | 5.03 | |
Converted to common stock | | | (266 | ) | | 11.10 | | | (628 | ) | | 7.41 | |
Forfeited | | | (9 | ) | | 5.38 | | | (84 | ) | | 10.67 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Ending Balance/Weighted Average | | | 6,239 | | $ | 7.36 | | | 4,208 | | $ | 7.53 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
- (1)
- Reflects the balance as of January 1, 2012 and 2011 for the periods ended September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.
- (2)
- Includes 698,142 LTIP Units issued in connection with the 2004 Long-Term Incentive Bonus Plan of which 581,311 LTIP Units have been converted.
The Company recognized equity-based compensation expense related to these awards of $1.1 million and $1.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $4.9 million and $5.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. As of September 30, 2012, the related equity-based compensation expense to be recognized over the remaining vesting period is $8.3 million, provided there are no forfeitures.
Incentive Compensation Plan
On July 21, 2009, the compensation committee of the board of directors (the "Committee") of the Company approved the material terms of an Incentive Compensation Plan for the Company's executive officers and other employees (the "Plan"). Under the Plan, a potential incentive compensation pool is expected to be established each calendar year. The size of the incentive pool will be calculated as the sum of: (a) 1.75% of the Company's "adjusted equity capital;" and (b) 25% of the Company's adjusted funds from operations, as adjusted, above a 9% return hurdle on adjusted equity capital. Payout from the incentive pool is subject to achievement of additional performance goals summarized below.
The incentive pool is expected to be divided into the following three separate incentive compensation components: (a) an annual cash bonus, tied to annual performance of the Company and paid after year end at or around completion of the year-end audit ("Annual Bonus"); (b) a deferred cash bonus, determined based on the same year's performance, but paid 50% following the close of each of the first and second years after such incentive pool is determined, subject to the participant's continued employment through each payment date ("Deferred Cash Bonus"); and (c) a long-term incentive in the form of restricted stock units ("RSUs") and/or LTIP Units. RSUs are subject to the Company achieving cumulative performance hurdles or target stock prices established by the Committee for a three- or four-year period, subject to the participant's continued employment through the payment date. Upon the conclusion of the applicable performance period, each executive officer
51
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
11. Equity-Based Compensation (Continued)
will receive a payout, if any, equal to the value of one share of common stock at the time of such payout, including the dividends paid with respect to a share of common stock following the first year of the applicable performance period, for each RSU actually earned (the "Long-Term Amount Value"). The Long-Term Amount Value, if any, will be paid in the form of shares of common stock or LTIP Units to the extent available under the Company's equity compensation plans or, if all or a portion of such shares or LTIP Units are not available, in cash; provided that the amount of cash paid to any executive officer with respect to the Long-Term Amount shall not exceed certain maximum amounts set forth in the Plan (the "Long Term Amount Payout").
The Committee evaluates the Plan on an annual basis and considers alternatives to the foregoing as the Committee deems appropriate and in the best interests of the Company. Performance goals for each component will be set by the Committee at the beginning of each subsequent calendar year for each new cycle. The goals will generally be divided into ranges of performance, each of which will correspond to a payout level equal to a percentage of a participant's pool allocation for such component.
The Company issued 3,147,454 RSUs to executive officers in connection with the 2009 Plan, subject to the Company achieving cumulative performance hurdles or target stock prices for the three-year period ended December 31, 2011. The Company determined in 2011 that the performance hurdle established was reached which entitled the recipients to 100% of the RSUs granted. The Company did not have a sufficient amount of common stock or LTIP Units available, as a result 2,609,074 RSUs were settled in cash in February 2012. For the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company recognized cash compensation expense of $13.9 million. The Company recorded a reversal of compensation expense of $0.3 million and compensation expense of $8.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, related to the total award. 538,380 RSUs will not be settled until December 31, 2012, subject to continued employment of certain executive officers through such date. As a result, the Company recognized compensation expense of $0.1 million and $0.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively.
The Company issued 2,209,998 RSUs to executive officers in connection with the 2010 Plan, subject to the Company achieving cumulative performance hurdles or target stock prices for the three-year period ending December 31, 2012. The Company determined in the fourth quarter of 2011 that it believed it would meet the performance hurdle entitling the recipients to 100% of the RSUs granted, and accordingly recorded a cumulative catch up adjustment of $3.6 million to compensation expense based on the stock price at the grant date. For three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company recognized compensation expense of $1.4 million and $0.6 million, respectively. For nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company recognized compensation expense of $4.3 million and $1.4 million, respectively.
52
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
11. Equity-Based Compensation (Continued)
In February 2012, the Company issued 1,525,797 RSUs to executive officers in connection with the 2011 Plan, subject to the Company achieving target stock prices for the four-year period ending December 31, 2014. The Company does not yet know whether it is probable that such measure will be achieved and that such RSUs will be earned. The fair value of the grant is being amortized into equity-based compensation expense over the performance period. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company recognized compensation expense of $0.4 million and $0.9 million, respectively. At the same time, the Company granted 1,525,797 LTIP Units to executive officers which vest to the recipient at a rate of four annual installments ending January 29, 2015 and 608,426 LTIP Units to certain non-executive employees, which vest quarterly over three years beginning April 2012.
12. Stockholders' Equity
Common Stock
On February 27, 2012, the Company completed the sale of 17.25 million shares of its common stock at a public offering price of $5.55 per share, which includes the full over-allotment option exercised by the underwriters of the offering. The net proceeds to the Company were $90.3 million.
On May 3, 2012, the Company completed the sale of 20.0 million shares of its common stock at a public offering price of $5.70 per share. The net proceeds to the Company were $108.8 million.
On August 3, 2012, in connection with a new debt investment, the Company issued 1.25 million shares of its common stock in a private offering to the borrower at a price of $6.00 per share, resulting in net proceeds to the Company of $6.8 million.
Preferred Stock
On March 14, 2012, the Company completed the sale of 1.6 million shares of its 8.25% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock ("Series B Preferred Stock") at a public offering price of $22.92 per share, excluding accrued dividends. The net proceeds were $35.2 million. The preferred stock is currently redeemable by the Company at a redemption price of $25.00 per share.
On July 9, 2012, the Company sold an additional 3.2 million shares of its Series B Preferred Stock, including the over-allotment option, at a public offering price of $22.95 per share generating $70.0 million in net proceeds excluding accrued dividends.
On June 12, 2012, the Company and its Operating Partnership entered into an "at-the-market" preferred stock offering program (the "Preferred ATM Program") pursuant to which the Company may issue and sell over time and from time-to-time up to 500,000 shares of its 8.75% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock ("Series A Preferred Stock") and up to 2,500,000 shares of its Series B Preferred Stock. Through September 30, 2012, the Company completed the sale of 66,689 shares of its Series A Preferred Stock and 1,578,905 shares of its Series B Preferred Stock for aggregate net proceeds of $36.7 million through the Preferred ATM Program.
Dividend Reinvestment Plan
In April 2007, as amended effective January 1, 2012, the Company implemented a Dividend Reinvestment Plan (the "DRP"), pursuant to which it registered with the SEC and reserved for
53
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
12. Stockholders' Equity (Continued)
issuance 14,279,846 shares of its common stock. Under the amended terms of the DRP, stockholders are able to automatically reinvest all or a portion of their dividends for additional shares of the Company's common stock. The Company expects to use the proceeds from the DRP for general corporate purposes. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company issued 27,266 common shares pursuant to the DRP for gross sales proceeds of $0.1 million.
Prior to the amendment, a participant could purchase shares directly from the Company in cash in amounts of up to $10,000 per month. The Company terminated the stock purchase component effective January 1, 2012. During the time between establishing the DRP and terminating the stock purchase component of the DRP, certain issuances of shares of the Company's common stock occurred more than three years after the related registration statement for those plans became effective. As a result, certain investors may have a rescission right. If a rescission right exists with respect to these issuances, it would apply to up to 127,500 of shares of the Company's common stock issued for an aggregate consideration of up to $513,500.
Dividends
The Company declared the following dividends (on a per share basis) for the nine months ended September 30, 2012:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Common Stock | | Preferred Stock | |
---|
| |
| |
| | Dividend | |
---|
Declaration Date | | Dividend | | Declaration Date | | Series A | | Series B | |
---|
February 15, 2012 | | $ | 0.135 | | | January 30, 2012 | | $ | 0.54688 | | $ | 0.51563 | |
May 2, 2012 | | $ | 0.150 | | | May 2, 2012 | | $ | 0.54688 | | $ | 0.51563 | |
August 2, 2012 | | $ | 0.160 | | | August 2, 2012 | | $ | 0.54688 | | $ | 0.51563 | |
54
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
12. Stockholders' Equity (Continued)
Earnings Per Share
Earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 is computed as follows (dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
---|
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 | |
---|
Numerator: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) attributable to NorthStar Realty Finance Corp. common stockholders | | $ | (149,578 | ) | $ | (24,553 | ) | $ | (261,007 | ) | $ | (180,331 | ) |
Effect of dilutive securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) allocated to Operating Partnership non-controlling interest | | | (7,059 | ) | | (1,084 | ) | | (12,726 | ) | | (9,130 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Dilutive net income (loss) available to stockholders | | $ | (156,637 | ) | $ | (25,637 | ) | $ | (273,733 | ) | $ | (189,461 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Denominator: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average number of shares of common stock | | | 134,272 | | | 95,957 | | | 120,491 | | | 87,105 | |
Effect of dilutive securities(1): | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average OP/LTIP units | | | 6,337 | | | 4,273 | | | 5,955 | | | 4,293 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average dilutive shares | | | 140,609 | | | 100,230 | | | 126,446 | | | 91,398 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) per share attributable to NorthStar Realty Finance Corp. common stockholders—Basic/Diluted | | $ | (1.11 | ) | $ | (0.26 | ) | $ | (2.17 | ) | $ | (2.06 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
- (1)
- Excludes the effect of RSUs, convertible debt and warrants outstanding and exercisable of 3,000,000 as of September 30, 2012 and 2011 that were not dilutive for the respective periods. These instruments could potentially impact diluted EPS in future periods, depending on changes in the Company's stock price and other factors.
The EPS calculation takes into account the conversion of LTIP Units into common shares which convert on a one-for-one basis into common shares and share equally in the Company's net income (loss).
13. Non-controlling Interests
Operating Partnership
Non-controlling interests includes the aggregate limited partnership interests ("OP Units") in the Operating Partnership held by limited partners (the "Unit Holders"). Net income (loss) allocated to the non-controlling interest is based on the Unit Holders' ownership percentage of the Operating Partnership. The ownership percentage is determined by dividing the number of OP Units held by the Unit Holders by the total number of dilutive shares. The issuance of additional shares of beneficial interest (the "Common Shares" or "Shares") or OP Units changes the percentage ownership of both the Unit Holders and the Company. Since a unit is generally redeemable for cash or Shares at the option of the Company, it is deemed to be equivalent to a Share. Therefore, such transactions are
55
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
13. Non-controlling Interests (Continued)
treated as capital transactions and result in an allocation between stockholders' equity and non-controlling interests in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets to account for the change in the ownership of the underlying equity in the Operating Partnership. As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, non-controlling interests related to aggregate limited partnership units of 6,239,383 and 4,207,836 OP Units, respectively, or a 4.4% and 4.2% interest in the Operating Partnership, respectively. Net income (loss) allocated to the Operating Partnership non-controlling interest for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was a loss of $7.1 million and $1.1 million, respectively. Net income (loss) allocated to the Operating Partnership non-controlling interest for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was a loss of $12.7 million and $9.1 million, respectively.
Contingently Redeemable Non-controlling Interest
On July 14, 2011, the Company repaid the $100.0 million preferred membership interest in NRF Healthcare, LLC to Inland American Real Estate Trust, Inc. ("Inland American"), which had a 10.5% distribution rate. Net income (loss) allocated to Inland American's non-controlling interest for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 was income of $0.4 million and $5.7 million, respectively.
Other
In the first quarter 2012, the Company repurchased non-controlling interests representing 16.7% of the equity notes of N-Star CDO I and 85% in certain bonds of N-Star CDO III. Other third-party interests include two assets in the CSE CDO and one REO with a 22.6% non-controlling interest. Net income (loss) allocated to the other non-controlling interests (including Inland American) for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was a loss of $0.6 million and $0.7 million, respectively. Net income (loss) allocated to the other non-controlling interests (including Inland American) for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was a loss of $1.2 million and income of $7.7 million, respectively.
The following table presents net income (loss) attributable to the Company's common stockholders (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
---|
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 | |
---|
Income (loss) from continuing operations | | $ | (149,583 | ) | $ | (27,159 | ) | $ | (261,221 | ) | $ | (196,076 | ) |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | | | (23 | ) | | (14 | ) | | (85 | ) | | (617 | ) |
Gain (loss) on sale from discontinued operations | | | 28 | | | 2,620 | | | 299 | | | 16,362 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) attributable to NorthStar Realty Finance Corp. common stockholders | | $ | (149,578 | ) | $ | (24,553 | ) | $ | (261,007 | ) | $ | (180,331 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
56
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
14. Risk Management and Derivative Activities
Derivatives
The Company uses derivative instruments primarily to manage interest rate risk exposure and such derivatives are not considered speculative. These derivative instruments are typically in the form of interest rate swap agreements and the primary objective is to minimize interest rate risks associated with the Company's investment and financing activities. The counterparties of these arrangements are major financial institutions with which the Company may also have other financial relationships. The Company is exposed to credit risk in the event of non-performance by these counterparties and it monitors their financial condition; however, the Company currently does not anticipate that any of the counterparties will fail to meet their obligations.
The following tables present the Company's derivative instruments that were not designated as hedges under U.S. GAAP as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Number | | Notional Amount(1) | | Fair Value Net Asset (Liability) | | Range of Fixed LIBOR | | Range of Maturity |
---|
As of September 30, 2012: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate swaps | | | 35 | | $ | 1,462,145 | | $ | (188,412 | )(2) | 4.55% - 5.63% | | December 2012 - October 2019 |
Interest rate caps/floors | | | 5 | | | 815,500 | | | 9,425 | | 1.64% - 7.00% | | January 2013 - October 2014 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 40 | | $ | 2,277,645 | | $ | (178,987 | ) | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
As of December 31, 2011: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate swaps | | | 38 | | $ | 1,836,972 | | $ | (234,616 | ) | 4.55% - 5.63% | | September 2012 - October 2019 |
Interest rate caps/floors | | | 5 | | | 468,500 | | | 5,677 | | 1.64% - 7.00% | | May 2012 - October 2014 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 43 | | $ | 2,305,472 | | $ | (228,939 | ) | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
- (1)
- Excludes timing swaps with a notional amount of $63.5 million and $288.8 million as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.
- (2)
- An aggregate of $1.5 billion notional amount of interest rate swaps were liabilities at period end and are only subject to the credit risks of the respective CDO transaction. As the interest rate swaps are senior to all the liabilities of the respective CDO and the fair value of each of the CDO's investments exceeded the fair value of the CDO's derivative liabilities, a credit valuation adjustment is not recorded.
In the first quarter 2012, the Company terminated $35.0 million notional amount of an interest rate swap. In the third quarter 2012, the Company terminated $148.6 million notional amount of an interest rate swap in a N-Star CDO and agreed to a discounted payoff, resulting in a realized gain of $7.9 million related to the transaction.
In June 2012, the Company purchased an interest rate floor with a $350.0 million notional amount. The remaining change in the notional amount from December 31, 2011 relates to contractual notional amortization and maturities. The Company had no derivative financial instruments that were designated as hedges in qualifying hedging relationships as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
57
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
14. Risk Management and Derivative Activities (Continued)
The following table presents the fair value of the Company's derivative instruments, as well as their classification on its consolidated balance sheets, as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Balance Sheet Location | | September 30, 2012 | | December 31, 2011 | |
---|
Interest rate caps/floors, not designated as hedges | | Derivative assets | | $ | 9,425 | | $ | 5,735 | |
Interest rate swaps, not designated as hedges | | Derivative liabilities | | $ | 188,412 | | $ | 234,674 | |
The following table presents the effect of the Company's derivative instruments in its consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
---|
| | Statements of Operations Location | |
---|
Non-hedge derivatives | | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 | |
---|
Amount of gain (loss) recognized in earnings: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Adjustments to fair value | | Unrealized gain (loss) on investment and other | | $ | 6,871 | | $ | (60,712 | ) | $ | 27,166 | | $ | (55,553 | ) |
Swap net cash payment | | Unrealized gain (loss) on investment and other | | $ | (18,552 | ) | $ | (24,574 | ) | $ | (61,159 | ) | $ | (79,530 | ) |
Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from OCI into earnings | | Interest expense | | $ | (1,845 | ) | $ | (1,873 | ) | $ | (5,591 | ) | $ | (5,618 | ) |
The Company's counterparties held no cash margin as collateral against the Company's derivative contracts as of September 30, 2012 and 2011.
Credit Risk Concentrations
Concentrations of credit risk arise when a number of borrowers, tenants, operators or issuers related to the Company's investments are engaged in similar business activities or located in the same geographic location to be similarly affected by changes in economic conditions. The Company monitors its portfolio to identify potential concentrations of credit risks. The Company has no one borrower, tenant or operator that generates 10% or more of its total revenue. However, two operators in the Company's healthcare net lease portfolio generate 12% and 20% of the Company's rental and escalation income for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, which represents 3% and 5% of total revenue, respectively. The Company believes the remainder of its net lease portfolio is reasonably well diversified and does not contain any unusual concentration of credit risks.
15. Commitments and Contingencies
WaMu Matter
In 2009, one of the Company's net lease investments comprised of three office buildings totaling 257,000 square feet located in Chatsworth, California and 100% leased to Washington Mutual Bank ("WaMu") was foreclosed on by the lender. The lender subsequently filed a complaint against
58
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
15. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)
subsidiaries of the Company in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles. In March 2012, the Court of Appeal of the State of California, Second Appellate District, issued a unanimous decision in favor of the Company's subsidiary, overturning the judgment issued by the Superior Court of California for the County of Los Angeles. The ruling directed the Superior Court to enter summary judgment in the Company's favor and reverses the award against the Company. Furthermore, the Court of Appeal awarded the Company costs on appeal. As a result of the ruling, in the first quarter 2012 the Company reversed the $20.0 million loss accrual and $2.0 million previously expensed surety bond costs and recorded such reversals in other income (loss) and other costs, net, respectively, in the consolidated statements of operations.
In August 2012, the Company received $26.0 million of cash posted as collateral in connection with a general agreement of indemnity that the Company was required to maintain with an issuer of surety bonds. In October 2012, the Company received the $3.3 million of premiums paid for the surety bond. The Company plans to seek reimbursement of its legal fees incurred in connection with the litigation.
The Company is involved in various litigation matters arising in the ordinary course of its business. Although the Company is unable to predict with certainty the eventual outcome of any litigation, in the opinion of management, the legal proceedings are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations.
16. Segment Reporting
The Company conducts its business through the following segments:
- •
- The CRE debt business is focused on originating, structuring, acquiring and managing senior and subordinate debt investments secured primarily by commercial and multifamily properties and includes first mortgage loans, subordinate mortgage interests, mezzanine loans, credit tenant loans and other loans, including preferred equity interests. For assets financed in a CDO, the CRE debt segment is based on the CDO financing transactions that are primarily collateralized by CRE debt and may include other types of investments.
- •
- The CRE securities business is focused on investing in and managing a wide range of CRE securities including, CMBS, unsecured REIT debt and CDO notes backed primarily by CRE securities and CRE debt. For assets financed in a CDO, the CRE securities segment is based on the CDO financing transactions that are primarily collateralized by CRE securities and may include other types of investments.
- •
- The net lease properties business is focused on acquiring commercial real estate located throughout the United States that are typically leased under long-term net leases to corporate tenants and healthcare operators. The core net lease business invests primarily in office, industrial and retail properties. The Company also owns, manages and invests in a portfolio of healthcare properties focused on mid-acuity facilities (i.e., skilled nursing and assisted living), with the highest concentration in assisted living facilities.
- •
- The asset management and other activities relate to real estate and real estate finance, including managing the N-Star, CSE and CapLease CDOs and sponsoring and advising on a fee basis, non-traded REITs (i.e., NorthStar Income). Management fees earned from CDO financing
59
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
16. Segment Reporting (Continued)
transactions are eliminated as a result of the consolidation of the respective CDO. The Company has also filed a registration statement on Form S-11 for NorthStar Healthcare, a non-traded REIT that intends to invest in CRE debt and equity investments focused on the healthcare sector. The SEC declared this registration statement effective in the third quarter 2012.
The Company primarily generates revenue from net interest income on the CRE debt and security portfolios, rental income from the net lease properties and fee income from the asset management and other related activities. The Company's income is primarily derived through the difference between revenues and the cost at which the Company is able to finance its assets. The Company may also invest in assets that generate attractive returns without any leverage. The following tables present selected results of operations by segment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Three months ended September 30, 2012: | | Real Estate Debt(1) | | Real Estate Securities(1) | | Net Lease Properties | | Asset Management/ Other | | Corporate(2) | | Eliminations(1) | | Consolidated Total | |
---|
Net interest income on debt and securities | | $ | 34,647 | | $ | 34,814 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 793 | | $ | — | | $ | 70,254 | |
Other revenues | | | 8,327 | | | — | | | 21,816 | | | 17,399 | | | 49 | | | (3,545 | ) | | 44,046 | |
Expenses | | | 21,961 | | | 602 | | | 18,655 | (3) | | 13,872 | | | 26,995 | | | (3,545 | ) | | 78,540 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from operations | | | 21,013 | | | 34,212 | | | 3,161 | | | 3,527 | | | (26,153 | ) | | — | | | 35,760 | |
Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated ventures | | | 160 | | | — | | | 194 | | | 67 | | | — | | | — | | | 421 | |
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments and other | | | (154,255 | ) | | (27,038 | ) | | — | | | — | | | (20,726 | ) | | — | | | (202,019 | ) |
Realized gain (loss) on investments and other | | | 364 | | | 14,857 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 15,221 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations | | | (132,718 | ) | | 22,031 | | | 3,355 | | | 3,594 | | | (46,879 | ) | | — | | | (150,617 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | | | (23 | ) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (23 | ) |
Gain (loss) on sale from discontinued operations | | | 29 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 29 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (132,712 | ) | $ | 22,031 | | $ | 3,355 | | $ | 3,594 | | $ | (46,879 | ) | $ | — | | $ | (150,611 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
60
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
16. Segment Reporting (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Three months ended September 30, 2011: | | Real Estate Debt(1) | | Real Estate Securities(1) | | Net Lease Properties | | Asset Management/ Other | | Corporate(2) | | Eliminations(1) | | Consolidated Total | |
---|
Net interest income on debt and securities | | $ | 44,123 | | $ | 45,572 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 272 | | $ | — | | $ | 89,967 | |
Other revenues | | | 6,621 | | | — | | | 20,375 | | | 7,753 | | | 38 | | | (4,444 | ) | | 30,343 | |
Expenses | | | 25,438 | | | 3,156 | | | 26,637 | (3) | | 4,889 | | | 21,937 | | | (4,444 | ) | | 77,613 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from operations | | | 25,306 | | | 42,416 | | | (6,262 | ) | | 2,864 | | | (21,627 | ) | | — | | | 42,697 | |
Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated ventures | | | (782 | ) | | — | | | 183 | | | (5 | ) | | — | | | — | | | (604 | ) |
Other income (loss) | | | 7,715 | | | — | | | (19,541 | ) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (11,826 | ) |
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments and other | | | 53,207 | | | (174,333 | ) | | — | | | — | | | 52,680 | | | — | | | (68,446 | ) |
Realized gain (loss) on investments and other | | | 13,373 | | | 991 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 14,364 | |
Gain from acquisitions | | | 81 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | | | 81 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations | | | 98,900 | | | (130,926 | ) | | (25,620 | ) | | 2,859 | | | 31,053 | | | — | | | (23,734 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | | | 377 | | | — | | | (393 | ) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (16 | ) |
Gain (loss) on sale from discontinued operations | | | 2,881 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 2,881 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 102,158 | | $ | (130,926 | ) | $ | (26,013 | ) | $ | 2,859 | | $ | 31,053 | | $ | — | | $ | (20,869 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- (1)
- Includes $3.5 million and $4.4 million of management fees related to the Company's CDO financing transactions for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, that are eliminated in consolidation. These amounts are recorded as expense in the real estate debt and real estate securities segments and recorded as revenue in the asset management/other segment.
- (2)
- Includes corporate level interest income, interest expense and unallocated general and administrative expenses.
- (3)
- Includes depreciation and amortization of $6.8 million and $7.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Nine months ended September 30, 2012: | | Real Estate Debt(1) | | Real Estate Securities(1) | | Net Lease Properties | | Asset Management/ Other | | Corporate(2) | | Eliminations(1) | | Consolidated Total | |
---|
Net interest income on debt and securities | | $ | 86,180 | | $ | 117,218 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 1,400 | | $ | — | | $ | 204,798 | |
Other revenues | | | 26,180 | | | 7 | | | 63,091 | | | 44,333 | | | 98 | | | (11,037 | ) | | 122,672 | |
Expenses | | | 66,600 | | | 3,310 | | | 56,528 | (3) | | 33,640 | | | 78,481 | | | (11,037 | ) | | 227,522 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from operations | | | 45,760 | | | 113,915 | | | 6,563 | | | 10,693 | | | (76,983 | ) | | — | | | 99,948 | |
Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated ventures | | | (1,386 | ) | | — | | | 578 | | | 392 | | | — | | | — | | | (416 | ) |
Other income (loss) | | | 258 | | | — | | | 20,000 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 20,258 | |
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments and other | | | (185,442 | ) | | (202,431 | ) | | — | | | — | | | (25,200 | ) | | — | | | (413,073 | ) |
Realized gain (loss) on investments and other | | | 8,172 | | | 27,565 | | | — | | | — | | | 31 | | | — | | | 35,768 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations | | | (132,638 | ) | | (60,951 | ) | | 27,141 | | | 11,085 | | | (102,152 | ) | | — | | | (257,515 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | | | (88 | ) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (88 | ) |
Gain (loss) on sale from discontinued operations | | | 314 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 314 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (132,412 | ) | $ | (60,951 | ) | $ | 27,141 | | $ | 11,085 | | $ | (102,152 | ) | $ | — | | $ | (257,289 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
61
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
16. Segment Reporting (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Nine months ended September 30, 2011: | | Real Estate Debt(1) | | Real Estate Securities(1) | | Net Lease Properties | | Asset Management/ Other | | Corporate(2) | | Eliminations(1) | | Consolidated Total | |
---|
Net interest income on debt and securities | | $ | 149,270 | | $ | 128,437 | | $ | 122 | | $ | — | | $ | 411 | | $ | — | | $ | 278,240 | |
Other revenues | | | 12,429 | | | 104 | | | 73,519 | | | 19,855 | | | 116 | | | (13,615 | ) | | 92,408 | |
Expenses | | | 89,148 | | | 10,687 | | | 84,264 | (3) | | 11,395 | | | 70,967 | | | (13,615 | ) | | 252,846 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from operations | | | 72,551 | | | 117,854 | | | (10,623 | ) | | 8,460 | | | (70,440 | ) | | — | | | 117,802 | |
Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated ventures | | | (4,905 | ) | | — | | | 499 | | | 19 | | | — | | | — | | | (4,387 | ) |
Other income (loss) | | | 17,853 | | | — | | | (19,541 | ) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (1,688 | ) |
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments and other | | | (117,336 | ) | | (266,854 | ) | | (18 | ) | | — | | | 32,937 | | | — | | | (351,271 | ) |
Realized gain (loss) on investments and other | | | 59,957 | | | 6,015 | | | (1,427 | ) | | — | | | (2,608 | ) | | — | | | 61,937 | |
Gain from acquisitions | | | 81 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 81 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations | | | 28,201 | | | (142,985 | ) | | (31,110 | ) | | 8,479 | | | (40,111 | ) | | — | | | (177,526 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | | | 138 | | | — | | | (792 | ) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (654 | ) |
Gain (loss) on sale from discontinued operations | | | 2,930 | | | — | | | 14,398 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 17,328 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 31,269 | | $ | (142,985 | ) | $ | (17,504 | ) | $ | 8,479 | | $ | (40,111 | ) | $ | — | | $ | (160,852 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- (1)
- Includes $11.0 million and $13.6 million of management fees related to the Company's CDO financing transactions for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, that are eliminated in consolidation. These amounts are recorded as expense in the real estate debt and real estate securities segments and recorded as revenue in the asset management/other segment.
- (2)
- Includes corporate level interest income, interest expense and unallocated general and administrative expenses.
- (3)
- Includes depreciation and amortization of $20.7 million and $22.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
The following table presents total assets by segment as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Real Estate Debt | | Real Estate Securities | | Net Lease Properties | | Asset Management/ Other | | Corporate | | Consolidated Total | |
---|
Total Assets as of September 30, 2012 | | $ | 2,629,474 | | $ | 1,257,676 | | $ | 855,556 | | $ | 14,957 | | $ | 254,098 | | $ | 5,011,760 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Assets as of December 31, 2011 | | $ | 2,449,323 | | $ | 1,520,650 | | $ | 862,411 | | $ | 8,583 | | $ | 165,470 | | $ | 5,006,437 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
62
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
17. Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities
The following table presents non-cash investing and financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 is as follows (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | |
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
---|
| | 2012 | | 2011 | |
---|
Real estate acquisition(1) | | $ | (35,304 | ) | $ | (247,186 | ) |
Assumption of mortgage(1) | | | — | | | 248,252 | |
Reduction of real estate debt investments(1) | | | 35,304 | | | 51,980 | |
Increase of restricted cash(1) | | | — | | | (10,666 | ) |
Foreclosure of timeshare interest(1) | | | — | | | (6,076 | ) |
Dividend payable related to RSUs | | | 1,923 | | | — | |
Redemption of non-controlling interests | | | 2,358 | | | — | |
Escrow deposit payable related to real estate debt investments | | | 38,034 | | | (5,995 | ) |
Equity component of 8.875% Notes | | | 2,179 | | | — | |
Reclassification of operating real estate to asset held for sale | | | 1,046 | | | 9,122 | |
Decrease of restricted cash in connection with swap collateral | | | (22,037 | ) | | — | |
Discount on debt investment | | | 2,516 | | | — | |
Servicer advances | | | (3,589 | ) | | 606 | |
- (1)
- Non-cash activity occurred in connection with taking title to a property.
18. Subsequent Events
Dividends
On November 1, 2012, the Company declared a dividend of $0.17 per share of common stock. The common stock dividend will be paid on November 16, 2012 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on November 12, 2012. On November 1, 2012, the Company declared a dividend of $0.54688 per share of Series A Preferred Stock and $0.51563 per share of Series B Preferred Stock. The preferred stock dividends will be paid on November 15, 2012, to stockholders of record as of the close of business on November 12, 2012.
Preferred Stock Issuance
In October 2012, the Company completed the sale of 5.0 million shares of its new 8.875% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock for net proceeds of $121.0 million. The preferred stock is currently redeemable by the Company at a redemption price of $25.00 per share.
NorthStar CMBS Financing Transaction
On October 26, 2012, the Company priced a $351 million CMBS financing transaction collateralized by CRE debt investments originated by the Company and on behalf of NorthStar Income that is expected to be closed in November 2012. A total of $228 million of bonds will be issued, representing an advance rate of 65% and a weighted average coupon of LIBOR plus 1.63%. The Company will contribute five real estate debt investments with a $152 million aggregate principal
63
Table of Contents
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
18. Subsequent Events (Continued)
amount and retain an equity interest of $54 million. The Company expects to generate an approximate 20% yield on its invested equity, inclusive of fees and estimated transaction expenses. There is no assurance the Company will realize this expected return on invested equity over the term of these investments. The Company's actual return on invested equity could vary significantly from its expectations. The Company plans to use the proceeds to repay $95 million of borrowings on its credit facilities.
64
Table of Contents
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in this report. References to "N-Star," "we," "us" or "our" refer to NorthStar Realty Finance Corp. and its subsidiaries unless the context specifically requires otherwise.
Introduction
NorthStar Realty Finance Corp. is a diversified commercial real estate, or CRE, investment and asset management company. We are an internally-managed real estate investment trust, or REIT, and were formed in October 2003. We conduct substantially all of our operations and make our investments through NorthStar Realty Finance Limited Partnership, or our Operating Partnership, including its subsidiaries. Our primary business lines are as follows:
- •
- Commercial Real Estate Debt—Our CRE debt business is focused on originating, structuring, acquiring and managing senior and subordinate debt investments secured primarily by commercial and multifamily properties and includes first mortgage loans, subordinate mortgage interests, mezzanine loans, credit tenant loans and other loans, including preferred equity interests. We directly underwrote and originated approximately 74% of the debt investments in our current portfolio (excluding debt originally owned in the CSE RE 2006-A CDO, or CSE CDO, and CapLease 2005-1 CDO, or CapLease CDO, that we consolidate as a result of acquiring the equity interests in 2010 and 2011, respectively, see also "—Sources of Operating Revenues and Cash Flows"). Our CRE debt portfolio represents approximately 39.1% of our assets under management as of September 30, 2012.
- •
- Commercial Real Estate Securities—Our CRE securities business is focused on investing in and managing a wide range of CRE securities, including commercial mortgage backed securities, or CMBS, unsecured REIT debt and collateralized debt obligation, or CDO, notes backed primarily by CRE securities and CRE debt. Our CRE securities portfolio represents approximately 38.7% of our assets under management as of September 30, 2012.
- •
- Net Lease Properties—Our net lease properties business is focused on acquiring commercial real estate located throughout the United States that are typically leased under net leases to corporate tenants and healthcare operators. Our core net lease business invests primarily in office, industrial and retail properties. We also own, manage and invest in a portfolio of healthcare properties focused on mid-acuity facilities (i.e., skilled nursing and assisted living), with the highest concentration in assisted living facilities. Our net lease properties portfolio represents approximately 13.6% of our assets under management as of September 30, 2012.
- •
- Asset Management and Other—Our asset management and other activities relate to real estate and real estate finance, including managing our CDO financing transactions on a fee basis and sponsoring and advising on a fee basis, non-traded REITs, or Sponsored REITs (i.e., NorthStar Real Estate Income Trust, Inc., or NorthStar Income, and NorthStar Healthcare Income, Inc., or NorthStar Healthcare). Our asset management segment represents approximately 8.6% of our assets under management as of September 30, 2012.
We believe that these businesses are complementary to each other due to their overlapping sources of investment opportunities, common reliance on real estate fundamentals and ability to utilize secured borrowings to finance assets and enhance returns. We seek to match fund our CRE debt and security investments primarily by issuing term financing and other forms of secured term financing.
Liquidity and access to capital returned to the commercial real estate finance markets in the first quarter of 2012. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we raised net proceeds of $206 million from the issuance of common equity, $142 million from the issuance of preferred stock (including pursuant to our at-the-market equity offering program) and $79 million from the issuance of
65
Table of Contents
exchangeable senior notes. Subsequent to quarter end, we raised an additional $121 million from the issuance of preferred stock. Total capital raised year to date is $548 million.
Our financing strategy focuses on match funding our assets and liabilities by having similar maturities and like-kind interest rate benchmarks (fixed or floating) to manage refinancing and interest rate risk. Our legacy CRE debt and security portfolios are predominantly financed through long-term, non-recourse CDOs. Our net lease properties are predominantly financed with non-recourse mortgage notes. Given the nature of our current financing arrangements, we expect to maintain our borrowing at or near our current levels for our existing investments. Borrowing levels may change for new investments depending upon the nature of the assets and the related financing.
In terms of new investment-level financing, we pursue a variety of financing arrangements such as credit facilities, securitized arrangements and other term borrowings. The amount of our borrowings will depend upon the nature and credit quality of our assets, the structure of our financings and where possible, we will seek to limit our reliance on recourse borrowings. In late 2011, we began using secured term credit facilities provided by major financial institutions to partially finance new investments. The credit facilities provide up to an aggregate of $140 million to finance loan originations and $100 million to make investments in CMBS. In October 2012, we priced a CMBS financing transaction, or the NorthStar CMBS Financing Transaction, that provides long-term, non-recourse, non-mark-to-market financing for the debt investments we will contribute to the transaction. The debt investments that will be contributed to the NorthStar CMBS Financing Transaction are currently financed on our credit facilities.
We are also focused on raising capital in alternate channels. Beginning in the second half of 2011, we started to see capital raising velocity increase in NorthStar Income. Total capital raised for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $297 million, with $452 million raised from inception through September 30, 2012. NorthStar Realty Securities, LLC, or NorthStar Realty Securities, our wholly-owned broker-dealer subsidiary, has executed selling agreements with broker-dealers covering more than 60,000 registered representatives as of September 30, 2012. Additionally, NorthStar Healthcare's registration statement on Form S-11 was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, in the third quarter 2012 and subsequently retained NorthStar Realty Securities to serve as its dealer manager.
Our Investments
The following describes the major CRE asset classes in which we invest and continue to actively manage to maximize stockholder value and to preserve our capital. The following table presents our
66
Table of Contents
assets under management as of September 30, 2012 based on principal amount of CRE debt and security investments and the cost basis of net lease properties (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | |
| | Amount | | Percentage | |
---|
CRE Debt | | | | | | | |
First mortgage loans | | $ | 1,644,207 | | | 23.2 | % |
Mezzanine loans | | | 442,850 | | | 6.2 | % |
Credit tenant and other loans | | | 232,491 | | | 3.3 | % |
Subordinate mortgage interests | | | 131,062 | | | 1.8 | % |
Other(1) | | | 324,012 | | | 4.6 | % |
| | | | | |
Total CRE debt | | | 2,774,622 | | | 39.1 | % |
CRE Securities | | | | | | | |
CMBS | | | 2,373,496 | | | 33.4 | % |
Third-party CDO notes | | | 225,959 | | | 3.2 | % |
Other securities | | | 148,905 | | | 2.1 | % |
| | | | | |
Total CRE securities | | | 2,748,360 | | | 38.7 | % |
Net Lease | | | | | | | |
Core net lease | | | 404,532 | | | 5.7 | % |
Healthcare net lease | | | 562,476 | | | 7.9 | % |
| | | | | |
Total net lease | | | 967,008 | | | 13.6 | % |
Subtotal NorthStar | | | 6,489,990 | | | 91.4 | % |
| | | | | |
Sponsored REIT | | | | | | | |
NorthStar Income(2) | | | 607,971 | | | 8.6 | % |
| | | | | |
Grand total | | $ | 7,097,961 | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | |
- (1)
- Relates to real estate owned (either directly or through a joint venture) as a result of taking title to a property through foreclosure, deed in lieu or otherwise ("taking title to a property"), presented at the principal amount of such loan at time of taking title.
- (2)
- Based on consolidated total assets.
Commercial Real Estate Debt
Our Portfolio
As of September 30, 2012, $2.8 billion, or 39.1%, of our assets under management were invested in CRE debt, which includes $0.3 million principal amount of loans related to certain investments accounted for as joint ventures and real estate owned. As of September 30, 2012, our $2.5 billion CRE debt portfolio consisted of 158 investments with an average investment size of $16 million.
67
Table of Contents
The portfolio's diversity across property type and geographic location is summarized as follows, based on outstanding principal amount:
| | |
Loan Portfolio by Property Type | | Loan Portfolio by Geographic Location |
| |
|
Commercial Real Estate Securities
Our Portfolio
As of September 30, 2012, $2.7 billion, or 38.7%, of our assets under management were invested in a portfolio of CRE securities. Our CRE securities portfolio consisted of 584 investments with an average investment size of $5 million. CMBS represents $2.4 billion, or 86.4%, of our CRE securities portfolio. The CMBS portfolio had an average credit rating of CCC+/Caa1. The following summarizes our CRE securities by type and CMBS by vintage, based on outstanding principal amount:
| | |
Securities by Type | | CMBS by Vintage(1) |
| |
|
- (1)
- 2006 and 2007 vintages were purchased at a weighted average discount of approximately 58%.
Net Lease Properties
Core Net Lease Properties
As of September 30, 2012, $405 million, or 5.7%, of our total assets under management were invested in our 24 core net lease properties, consisting of a portfolio of office, retail and industrial facilities totaling 3.2 million square feet. As of September 30, 2012, our core net lease properties had a weighted average remaining lease term of 5.9 years and were 96% leased.
68
Table of Contents
The following summarizes our core net lease portfolio's diversity across property type and geographic location as of September 30, 2012, based on purchase price, or cost.
| | |
Core Net Lease by Property Type | | Core Net Lease by Geographic Location |
| |
|
Healthcare Net Lease Properties
As of September 30, 2012, $562 million, or 7.9%, of our assets under management were invested in our healthcare net lease properties, with a focus on the senior housing sector which includes assisted living, skilled nursing and independent living facilities. Our portfolio was comprised of 42 assisted living facilities (ALF), 31 skilled nursing facilities (SNF), three life science buildings (LSB), six independent living facilities (ILF) and one medical office building (MOB). As of September 30, 2012, 100% of our net lease healthcare portfolio was leased to third-party operators with weighted average lease coverage of 1.3x and a 7.2 year weighted average remaining lease term.
The following summarizes our healthcare portfolio by property type and geographic location as of September 30, 2012, based on purchase price:
| | |
Healthcare Net Lease by Property Type | | Healthcare Net Lease by Property Type |
| |
|
Asset Management and Other
Our asset management and other activities are focused on:
- •
- Managing CDO financing transactions on a fee basis.
We manage eleven CDOs representing $5.5 billion of assets based on principal amount, nine of which were sponsored by us, or the N-Star CDOs. In addition, we acquired the equity interests of two CDOs that have been integrated into our platform, the CSE CDO and the CapLease CDO, which we herein collectively refer to as our acquired CDOs. In the case of the CSE CDO, we were delegated the collateral management and special servicing rights and for the CapLease CDO, we acquired the collateral management rights. Five of the CDOs are primarily collateralized by CRE debt and six are primarily collateralized by CRE securities.
69
Table of Contents
We consolidate these CDO financing transactions under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or U.S. GAAP. As a result, the collateral management fees we earn and receive in cash are eliminated in consolidation in the statements of operations.
- •
- Sponsoring and advising on a fee basis, our Sponsored REITs.
In connection with our current public Sponsored REIT, NorthStar Income, we manage the day-to-day affairs including identifying, originating, acquiring and managing investments on its behalf, and we earn advisory and other fees for these services, which vary based on the amount of assets under management, investment activity and investment performance.
In addition, NorthStar Realty Securities distributes equity for our Sponsored REITs. NorthStar Realty Securities is currently raising equity capital for NorthStar Income and will raise equity capital for NorthStar Healthcare. In addition, we expect that NorthStar Realty Securities will assist us in the future in accessing diverse sources of capital for other companies that may be sponsored and managed by us.
Other Opportunistic Investments
We also pursue other opportunistic investments that we expect will generate attractive risk-adjusted returns, such as repurchasing our CDO bonds at a significant discount to principal amount as well as other real estate-related investments. These CDO bonds typically have significant credit support and, when we repurchase a CDO bond, we generally expect the CDO bonds will be repaid at par.
As of November 2, 2012, the principal proceeds we could receive from CDO bonds we owned was $805 million, of which $655 million was repurchased at an average price of 37% in the secondary market and had a weighted average original credit rating of A+/A1. Because our CDO financing transactions are consolidated under U.S. GAAP, these CDO bonds are generally not presented as an investment but rather are eliminated in our consolidated financial statements. We will generate cash flows in future periods through the interest payable on these bonds, as well as realizing (in cash) the discount as the bonds repay. If realized, this $416 million discount will generally not be reported as a gain and the interest will not be recorded as income under U.S. GAAP.
Sources of Operating Revenues and Cash Flows
We primarily generate revenues from net interest income on our CRE debt and security portfolios, rental income from the net lease properties and fee income from the asset management and other related activities. Our income is primarily derived through the difference between revenues and the cost at which we are able to finance our assets. We may also acquire investments which generate attractive returns without any leverage.
Our legacy CRE debt and security investments are predominantly financed in CDOs. We consolidate the CDO financing transactions under U.S. GAAP regardless of whether we retain the equity interests for our sponsored CDOs or acquire the equity interests of other CDOs. However, we generate cash flows based on the equity interests that we retain/acquire. As a result, the cash flows may be different from the income (loss) generated for U.S. GAAP purposes.
In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we refer to certain CDOs that we consolidate on our balance sheet as "our CDOs." Our CDOs are financing transactions that we consolidate on our balance sheet in accordance with U.S. GAAP, as we own the equity interests in such CDOs. We do not, however, own undivided interests in any of the assets within our CDOs and all senior and junior bondholders of the CDOs have economic interests that are senior to our equity interests. A more detailed discussion of our CDO financing transactions is provided in this section under "—Liquidity and Capital Resources."
70
Table of Contents
Profitability and Performance Metrics
We calculate several metrics to evaluate the profitability and performance of our business.
- •
- Adjusted funds from operations, or AFFO (see "—Non-GAAP Financial Measures—Funds from Operations and Adjusted Funds from Operations" for a description of this metric).
- •
- Credit losses are a measure of performance and can be used to compare the credit performance of our assets to our competitors and other finance companies.
- •
- Assets under management growth is a driver of our ability to grow our income especially related to our Sponsored REITs, but we believe it is of lesser importance than other metrics such as AFFO.
- •
- Cash from our investments is a driver of our ability to maintain and/or grow our distributions to our stockholders.
Outlook and Recent Trends
In the first half of 2011, liquidity began to return to the commercial real estate finance markets and capital started to become available to the stronger sponsors. Wall Street and commercial banks began to more actively provide credit to real estate borrowers. A proxy of the easing of credit and restarting of the capital markets for CRE debt is the approximately $30 billion in non-agency CMBS issuance that were completed in 2011. Credit started to contract in mid-2011 as the European debt woes began to unfold resulting in severe market volatility.
Global financial markets continue to be strained in 2012 and we expect that the commercial real estate finance markets will continue to be volatile in the near term due to anemic United States economic growth, continued high levels of unemployment and global market instability, along with the risk of maturing CRE debt that will have difficulties being refinanced. There was a coordinated effort to stimulate growth by several of the world's largest central banks through massive injections of stimulus in the financial markets in September 2012 which will also have the likely impact of keeping interest rates low for the near and intermediate term.
It is currently estimated that $1.3 trillion of CRE debt will mature in the next three years and $2.1 trillion will mature through 2017. While there is increased demand among lenders to provide such financing, we still anticipate that many of these loans will not be able to be refinanced, exacerbating growth and potentially leading to contracting credit. The capital markets are opening up as evidenced by our recent NorthStar CMBS Financing Transaction. Refer to "Financing Strategy" for additional details. The recent stimulus in the United States helped to increase demand for new CMBS, even though current new issue is still well below historic levels. Through September 30, 2012, there has been $31 billion in non-agency CMBS issuance. We expect the second half of 2012 to be better than the first half. Originally $35 billion of total non-agency CMBS issuance was projected for 2012 and now many industry experts are predicting that to be $40 to $45 billion.
Virtually all commercial real estate property types were adversely impacted by the credit crisis, including core property types such as hotel, retail, office, industrial and multifamily properties. Land, condominium and other commercial property types were more severely impacted. As a result, cash flows and values associated with properties serving as collateral for our loans are generally weaker than expected when we originated the loans. Despite the difficult United States and global economic conditions, investor interest has been returning to commercial real estate especially in urban areas having high concentrations of institutional quality real estate and especially in certain asset types such as apartments. The degree to which commercial real estate values improve or erode in 2012 in the markets in which our real estate collateral is located, will impact the performance of our asset base and the related level of loan losses.
71
Table of Contents
Our CRE debt and securities investments are negatively impacted by weaker real estate market and economic conditions. Slow economic conditions reduce a tenant's ability to make rent payments in accordance with the terms of their leases and for companies to lease new space. To the extent that market rental and occupancy rates are reduced, property-level cash flows are negatively affected as existing leases renew at lower rates and over longer periods of time impact the value of underlying properties and the borrowers' ability to service their outstanding loans.
Many of our legacy CRE debt investments bear interest based on a spread to one-month LIBOR, a floating-rate index based on rates that banks charge each other to borrow. One-month LIBOR as of September 30, 2012 was 0.21%, well below its 0.99% average over the past five years. Lower LIBOR means lower debt service costs for our borrowers. This dynamic has partially offset decreasing cash flows caused by the challenging economic conditions and may also result in extending the life of interest reserves for those debt investments that require interest reserves to service debt. However, many of our new CRE loan originations have a LIBOR floor that is in excess of current LIBOR. The degree in which rates will remain low is driven in a significant part by the actions of the Federal Reserve. Our current expectation is that rates will remain low into 2014.
CRE security values are also influenced by credit ratings assigned by the rating agencies. Beginning in 2009 and continuing into late 2011, the rating agencies dramatically changed their ratings methodologies for all securitized asset classes, including commercial real estate. Combined with challenging economic conditions, their reviews have resulted in large amounts of rating downgrade actions for CMBS, negatively impacting market values of CMBS and in many cases negatively impacting the CDO financing structures used by us and others to finance these assets. To some extent, we took advantage of the rating agency downgrades by purchasing $1.2 billion of CMBS in our CDOs in 2009 and 2010 at a weighted average discount to par of approximately 60%.
Our net lease properties are also adversely impacted by a weaker economy. Corporate space needs contracted resulting in lower lease renewal rates and longer releasing periods when leases are not renewed. Poor economic conditions may negatively impact the creditworthiness of our tenants/operators, which could result in their inability to meet the terms of their leases. Further, our healthcare net lease portfolio is also subject to impact from regulatory changes which are also impacted by a weak economy, such as changes to the Medicaid and Medicare programs that could negatively affect property values. Although we cannot make assurances that our cash flow will not be impacted by changes to these programs, a majority of our assets do not derive revenues from these government programs and we believe assets dependent on these programs have adequate lease coverage to support the rent of our operators.
Our Strategy
Our primary business objectives are to make commercial real estate-related investments in order to produce attractive risk-adjusted returns and engage in asset management activity in order to generate stable cash flows for distribution to our stockholders and build long-term franchise value. When we observed deteriorating market conditions, we responded by decreasing investment activity and preserving capital. At the same time, we focused on raising capital in alternative channels, such as the non-traded REIT market.
We currently anticipate that most of our investment activity and uses of available unrestricted cash liquidity will be focused on our businesses of originating new loans and investing in securities, as well as opportunistic investments, including discounted repurchases of our previously-issued CDO bonds and other opportunistic real estate-related investments that we believe will be beneficial to us. Availability and cost of capital will impact our profitability and earnings since we must raise new capital to fund a majority of this growth. As a result, we also remain focused on the growth of our asset management business and in particular, our Sponsored REITs.
72
Table of Contents
As liquidity was becoming more available and commercial real estate fundamentals were beginning to stabilize in 2011 and 2012, we took advantage of this dynamic in terms of both capital raising and investment activity. We raised $232 million of capital in the first half of 2011 and $548 million of capital in 2012 through October 2012. In addition, we entered into two $100 million term credit facilities in the fourth quarter 2011 to finance the origination of CRE first mortgage loans and the purchase of AAA-rated CMBS investments. In July 2012, we entered into an additional credit facility that provides up to $40 million on a non-recourse basis, subject to certain exceptions, to finance first mortgage loans and senior loan participations secured by commercial real estate. In October 2012, we priced the NorthStar CMBS Financing Transaction to permanently finance debt investments on a non-recourse, non-mark to market basis that had previously been financed on our credit facilities.
Throughout 2012, we have been actively investing across our businesses. Year to date through November 2, 2012, we originated seven loans and acquired three loans with an aggregate principal amount of $227 million (including two interests owned through joint ventures). The weighted average expected return on invested equity of these debt investments is approximately 18%, including the impact of the NorthStar CMBS Financing Transaction. Also, as the advisor of NorthStar Income, we originated eleven loans with a principal amount of $308 million during the same period. The principal proceeds we could receive from CDO bonds acquired through November 2, 2012 is $326 million, which were purchased for $159 million and have an expected yield-to-maturity of over 20%. We invested $93 million of equity in other real estate-related investments with an expected return on invested equity of approximately 16%. There is no assurance we will realize these expected returns on invested equity over the term of these investments. Our actual return on invested equity could vary significantly from our expectations.
We believe the supply/demand imbalance driven by the large amount of maturing CRE loans creates an opportunity for us. Even with some increased demand to provide financing by lenders, demand for capital is allowing investors with capital, such as us, to make investments with attractive risk/return profiles compared to historical levels.
Financing Strategy
We seek to access a wide range of secured and unsecured debt and public and private equity capital sources to fund our investment activities and asset growth. Since our IPO in 2004, we have completed preferred and common equity offerings raising approximately $1.4 billion of aggregate net proceeds including raising $206 million from the issuance of common equity and $142 million from the issuance of preferred equity through the nine months ended September 30, 2012. We have also raised $286 million of long-term, subordinated debt capital that is equity-like in nature due to its 30-year term (at the time of issuance) and relatively few covenants. In addition, we have raised over $500 million of unsecured exchangeable senior notes, of which $303 million was outstanding as of September 30, 2012.
We use asset-level financing as part of our strategy and we seek to match fund our assets and liabilities by having similar maturities and like-kind interest rate benchmarks (fixed or floating) to manage refinancing and interest rate risk. We seek access to diverse sources of short and long-term financing to enable us to prudently leverage our assets and deliver attractive risk-adjusted returns to our stockholders.
Our legacy CRE debt and security portfolios are predominantly financed through long-term, non-recourse CDOs. In our N-Star CDOs, rated CDO bonds are issued and backed by pools of collateral originated or acquired by us. The CDO bonds are non-recourse and the collateral is used to service the interest payments on the rated CDO bonds. After a reinvestment period, which is typically five years, principal from collateral payoffs is used to amortize the CDO bonds, so there is no maturity risk. We typically have sold all of the investment-grade rated CDO bonds and retained the non-investment grade subordinate classes and equity notes, which we refer to as our retained equity interest in the CDO.
73
Table of Contents
CDO financings provided low-cost borrowing because the majority of the liabilities we issued were the most senior bond classes which were rated "AAA/Aaa" by the rating agencies, and, therefore, had the lowest cost of funds. Refer to the "Liquidity and Capital Resources" section for additional details regarding our CDO financing transactions.
We actively seek financing for our businesses of originating loans, acquiring CRE securities and making opportunistic investments. In late 2011, we began using secured term credit facilities to partially finance new investments. These credit facilities provide for an aggregate of $140 million to finance first mortgage loans and senior loan participations secured by commercial real estate and $100 million to finance the acquisition of AAA-rated CMBS. As of September 30, 2012, we had $110 million outstanding under our loan credit facilities and $40 million outstanding under our CMBS facility. In October 2012, we priced the NorthStar CMBS Financing Transaction to permanently finance debt investments that are currently financed on our credit facilities.
Our net lease properties and certain real estate owned, or REO, are typically financed with non-recourse mortgages. We seek to match the term of the financing with the remaining lease term of the properties.
Given the nature of our financing arrangements, we expect to maintain our borrowings at or near our current levels for our existing investments. Borrowing levels may change for new investments depending upon the nature of the assets and the related financing. Our financing strategy for current or future investments is dependent on our ability to obtain match-funded borrowings at rates that provide a positive net funding spread. Match-funded borrowing was difficult to obtain during the credit crisis. During that time, we focused on using our existing CDO structures to fund future investment activity when repayment or sale proceeds became available within the CDOs or we acquired investments that generated attractive returns without leverage.
Risk Management
Credit risk management is our ability to manage our assets in a manner that preserves principal and income and minimizes credit losses that would decrease income. We use many methods to actively manage our asset base to preserve our income and capital. For CRE debt and net lease assets, frequent dialogue with borrowers/tenants/operators and inspections of our collateral and owned properties have proven to be an effective process for identifying issues early. For our healthcare net lease assets, we also consider the impact of regulatory changes on operator performance and property values. Many of our debt investments also require borrowers to replenish cash reserves for items such as taxes, insurance and future debt service costs. Late replenishments of cash reserves also may be an early indicator there could be a problem with the borrower or collateral property. We also may negotiate a modification to debt terms if we believe such modification improves our ability to maximize principal recovery. Modifications may include changes to contractual interest rates, maturity dates and other borrower obligations. When we make a concession, generally through a reduction of an interest rate, we may seek to obtain additional collateral, fees and/or upside participation in any value creation of the property in return for the modification, although in a challenging real estate market obtaining additional collateral from struggling borrowers is difficult. As part of our risk management process, we evaluate the best alternatives for our loans which in some cases, may result in us issuing default notices and beginning proceedings to take title to a property when the borrower is not complying with the debt terms where we believe taking control of the collateral as REO is the best course of action to protect our capital.
In certain circumstances, we may pursue a debt sale or payoff at a discount to our carrying value. We may agree to a discounted sale or payoff where we believe there is an economic benefit from monetizing the asset in advance of its contractual maturity date. When evaluating a sale or payoff at a
74
Table of Contents
discount to carrying value, we also consider the impact such transaction may have on our financing structures, corporate borrowing covenants and income.
Securities generally have a more liquid market than debt and net lease properties, but we typically have very little control over restructuring decisions when there are problems with the underlying collateral. We are a rated special servicer by Standard & Poor's and Fitch Ratings and were approved by Moody's Investor Services in connection with an acquisition of a "B-piece" in a new $2.1 billion securitization in 2011. We manage risk in the securities portfolio by selling assets when we can obtain a price that is attractive relative to its risk. In certain situations, we may sell an asset because there is an opportunity to reinvest the capital into a new asset with a more attractive risk/return profile.
We maintain a comprehensive risk management process that generally includes day-to-day oversight by the portfolio management team, weekly management meetings and a quarterly credit review process. These processes are designed to enable management to evaluate and proactively manage asset-specific credit issues and identify credit trends on a portfolio-wide basis. Nevertheless, we cannot be certain that our review will identify all issues within our portfolio due to, among other things, adverse economic conditions or events adversely affecting specific assets; therefore, potential future losses may also stem from investments that are not identified by our credit reviews. During the quarterly reviews, or more frequently as necessary, investments are put on highly-monitored status and identified for possible loan loss reserve based upon several factors, including missed or late contractual payments, significant declines in collateral performance and other data which may indicate a potential issue in our ability to recover our capital from the investment.
Many of our debt investments were made to borrowers who had a business plan to improve the collateral property and who therefore needed a flexible balance sheet lender. Property cash flows are generally lower today than was projected by the borrower for many of our debt investments when they were originated. As a result, some real estate owners are having trouble refinancing their assets at maturity or selling their properties to recoup their capital. Other owners are having trouble achieving their business plans to the extent they acquired a property to reposition it or otherwise invest capital to increase the property's cash flows.
We generally required the borrowers, at the time of origination and/or as required by property performance during the loan term, to pre-fund reserves to cover interest and operating expenses until the property cash flows increased sufficiently to cover debt service costs. We also generally required the borrower to refill these reserves if they became deficient due to underperformance and if the borrower wanted to exercise an extension option under the loan as some of the borrowers had a recourse obligation to do so. Despite low interest rates and improving real estate fundamentals, we expect that in the future some of our borrowers related to our legacy debt investments may still have difficulty servicing our debt.
Each of our debt investments, while primarily backed by CRE collateral, is unique and requires customized risk management strategies for dealing with potential credit situations. The complexity of each situation depends on many factors, including the number of collateral properties, the type of property, macro and local market conditions impacting supply/demand, cash flow and collateral, and the financial condition of our borrowers and their willingness to support our collateral properties.
Our risk management process may lead us to the determination that extending and working out debt, rather than pursuing taking title to a property, is the best course of action to maximize total and long-term value. Our provision for loan loss analysis often requires that we make assumptions regarding collateral value and the timing with regards to when we receive debt service payments, including principal recovery, and as a result, our analysis can be highly subjective and uncertain.
Our legacy CRE debt and security investments are predominantly financed in CDOs. We consolidate the CDO financing transactions under U.S. GAAP regardless of whether we retained the
75
Table of Contents
equity interests for our sponsored CDOs or acquired the equity interests of other CDOs. The CDOs require that we meet tests in order to receive regular cash flow distributions on our subordinate CDO bonds, preferred shares and equity notes. Our risk management process is also focused on actively monitoring and managing our CDO financing transactions.
Critical Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of NorthStar Realty Finance Corp. and our subsidiaries, which are majority-owned and controlled by us or a variable interest entity, or VIE, where we are the primary beneficiary. All significant intercompany balances are eliminated in consolidation.
A VIE is defined as an entity in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. The determination of whether an entity is a VIE includes both a qualitative and quantitative analysis. We base the qualitative analysis on our review of the design of the entity, its organizational structure including decision-making ability and relevant financial agreements and the quantitative analysis on the forecasted cash flows of the entity. We reassess the initial evaluation of an entity as a VIE upon the occurrence of certain reconsideration events.
A VIE must be consolidated only by its primary beneficiary, which is defined as the party who, along with its affiliates and agents, has a potentially significant interest in the entity and controls such entity's significant decisions. We determine whether we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE by considering qualitative and quantitative factors, including, but not limited to: which activities most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance and which party controls such activities; the amount and characteristics of its investment; the obligation or likelihood for us or other interests to provide financial support; consideration of the VIE's purpose and design, including the risks the VIE was designed to create and passthrough to its variable interest holders and the similarity with and significance to our business activities and the other interests. We reassess the determination of whether we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE each reporting period. Significant judgments related to these determinations include estimates about the current and future fair value and performance of investments held by these VIEs and general market conditions.
Fair Value Option
The fair value option provides an election that allows companies to irrevocably elect fair value for financial assets and liabilities on an instrument-by-instrument basis at initial recognition. Changes in fair value for assets and liabilities for which the election is made will be recognized in earnings as they occur.
Fair Value Measurement
We follow fair value guidance in accordance with U.S. GAAP to account for our financial instruments. We categorize our financial instruments, based on the priority of the inputs to the valuation technique, into a three-level fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). If the inputs used to measure the financial instruments fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.
76
Table of Contents
Financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on our consolidated balance sheets are categorized based on the inputs to the valuation techniques as follows:
| | | | |
Level 1. | | Quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market. |
Level 2. | | Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on the following: |
| | a) | | Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets. |
| | b) | | Quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in non-active markets. |
| | c) | | Pricing models whose inputs are observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. |
| | d) | | Pricing models whose inputs are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. |
Level 3. | | Prices or valuation techniques based on inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. |
Financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Management determines the prices are representative of fair value through a review of available data, including observable inputs, recent transactions as well as our knowledge and experience of the market.
Credit Losses and Impairment on Investments
Real Estate Debt Investments
Loans are considered impaired when based on current information and events, it is probable that we will not be able to collect principal and interest amounts due according to the contractual terms. We assess the credit quality of the portfolio and adequacy of loan loss reserves on a quarterly basis, or more frequently as necessary. Significant judgment of management is required in this analysis. We consider the estimated net recoverable value of the loan as well as other factors, including but not limited to the fair value of any collateral, the amount and the status of any senior debt, the quality and financial condition of the borrower and the competitive situation of the area where the collateral is located. Because this determination is based upon projections of future economic events, which are inherently subjective, the amounts ultimately realized may differ materially from the carrying value as of the balance sheet date. If upon completion of the assessment, the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral is less than the net carrying value of the loan, a loan loss reserve is recorded with a corresponding charge to the provision for loan losses. The loan loss reserve for each loan is maintained at a level that is determined to be adequate by management to absorb probable losses.
Income recognition is suspended for loans at the earlier of the date at which payments become 90-days past due or when, in the opinion of management, a full recovery of income and principal becomes doubtful. When the ultimate collectability of the principal of an impaired loan is in doubt, all payments are applied to principal under the cost recovery method. When the ultimate collectability of the principal of an impaired loan is not in doubt, contractual interest is recorded as interest income when received, under the cash basis method until an accrual is resumed when the loan becomes contractually current and performance is demonstrated to be resumed. A loan is written off when it is no longer realizable and/or legally discharged.
Real Estate Securities
CRE securities for which the fair value option is elected are not evaluated for other-than-temporary impairment, or OTTI, as changes in fair value are recorded in our consolidated statements of operations. Realized losses on such securities are reclassified to realized gain (loss) on investments
77
Table of Contents
and other as losses occur. CRE securities for which the fair value option is not elected are evaluated for OTTI quarterly.
Operating Real Estate
Our real estate portfolio is reviewed on a quarterly basis, or more frequently as necessary, to assess whether there are any indicators that the value of our operating real estate may be impaired or that its carrying value may not be recoverable. A property's value is considered impaired if management's estimate of the aggregate future undiscounted cash flows to be generated by the property is less than the carrying value of the property. In conducting this review, management considers United States macroeconomic factors, including real estate sector conditions, together with asset specific and other factors. To the extent an impairment has occurred the loss will be measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the property over the calculated fair value of the property.
Allowances for doubtful accounts for tenant/operator receivables are established based on periodic review of aged receivables resulting from estimated losses due to the inability of tenants/operators to make required rent and other payments contractually due. Additionally, we establish, on a current basis, an allowance for future tenant/operator credit losses on billed and unbilled rents receivable based upon an evaluation of the collectability of such amounts.
Other
Refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 for a complete discussion of our critical accounting policies.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or the FASB, issued an accounting update to amend existing guidance concerning fair value measurements and disclosures. The update is intended to achieve common fair value measurements and disclosure requirements under U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards and is effective for the first interim or annual period beginning after December 15, 2011. We adopted this accounting update in the first quarter 2012 and the required disclosures have been incorporated into Note 4 of our consolidated financial statements. The adoption did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued an accounting update concerning the presentation of comprehensive income. The update requires either a single, continuous statement of comprehensive income be included in the statement of operations or an additional statement of comprehensive income immediately following the statement of operations. The update does not change the components of other comprehensive income that must be reported but it eliminates the option to present other comprehensive income on the statement of equity. In December 2011, the FASB issued an accounting update to defer the requirement to present the reclassification adjustments to other comprehensive income by component and are currently redeliberating this requirement. The remaining requirements of the accounting update were effective for us in the first quarter 2012 and were applied retrospectively to all periods reported after the effective date. Early adoption is permitted. There was no impact on our consolidated financial statements as we currently comply with the update.
78
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
Comparison of the Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 to September 30, 2011 (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Increase (decrease) | |
---|
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | Amount | | % | |
---|
Net interest income | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest income | | $ | 82,558 | | $ | 100,682 | | $ | (18,124 | ) | | (18.0 | )% |
Interest expense on debt and securities | | | 12,304 | | | 10,715 | | | 1,589 | | | 14.8 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net interest income on debt and securities | | | 70,254 | | | 89,967 | | | (19,713 | ) | | (21.9 | )% |
Other revenues | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rental and escalation income | | | 29,960 | | | 26,996 | | | 2,964 | | | 11.0 | % |
Commission income | | | 12,213 | | | 3,131 | | | 9,082 | | | 290.1 | % |
Advisory and other fees | | | 1,507 | | | 130 | | | 1,377 | | | 1,059.2 | % |
Other revenue | | | 366 | | | 86 | | | 280 | | | 325.6 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total other revenues | | | 44,046 | | | 30,343 | | | 13,703 | | | 45.2 | % |
Expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other interest expense | | | 23,618 | | | 29,160 | | | (5,542 | ) | | (19.0 | )% |
Real estate properties—operating expenses | | | 5,145 | | | 3,539 | | | 1,606 | | | 45.4 | % |
Asset management expenses | | | 751 | | | 1,302 | | | (551 | ) | | (42.3 | )% |
Commission expense | | | 11,070 | | | 2,698 | | | 8,372 | | | 310.3 | % |
Provision for loan losses | | | 6,360 | | | 9,340 | | | (2,980 | ) | | (31.9 | )% |
General and administrative | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Salaries and equity-based compensation | | | 13,691 | | | 11,386 | | | 2,305 | | | 20.2 | % |
Other general and administrative | | | 6,170 | | | 7,426 | | | (1,256 | ) | | (16.9 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total general and administrative | | | 19,861 | | | 18,812 | | | 1,049 | | | 5.6 | % |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 11,735 | | | 12,762 | | | (1,027 | ) | | (8.0 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total expenses | | | 78,540 | | | 77,613 | | | 927 | | | 1.2 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from operations | | | 35,760 | | | 42,697 | | | (6,937 | ) | | (16.2 | )% |
Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated ventures | | | 421 | | | (604 | ) | | 1,025 | | | (169.7 | )% |
Other income (loss) | | | — | | | (11,826 | ) | | 11,826 | | | (100.0 | )% |
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments and other | | | (202,019 | ) | | (68,446 | ) | | (133,573 | ) | | 195.2 | % |
Realized gain (loss) on investments and other | | | 15,221 | | | 14,364 | | | 857 | | | 6.0 | % |
Gain from acquisitions | | | — | | | 81 | | | (81 | ) | | (100.0 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations | | | (150,617 | ) | | (23,734 | ) | | (126,883 | ) | | 534.6 | % |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | | | (23 | ) | | (16 | ) | | (7 | ) | | 43.8 | % |
Gain (loss) on sale from discontinued operations | | | 29 | | | 2,881 | | | (2,852 | ) | | (99.0 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (150,611 | ) | $ | (20,869 | ) | $ | (129,742 | ) | | 621.7 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net Interest Income
Net interest income is generated on our interest-earning assets and related interest-bearing liabilities and is represented in our debt and security segments. For assets financed in a CDO, the CRE debt and security segments are based on the primary collateral of the CDO financing transaction and as such may include other types of investments.
79
Table of Contents
The following table presents the average balance of interest-earning assets and related interest-bearing liabilities, associated interest income and expense and corresponding yield earned and incurred for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Amounts presented have been impacted by the timing of new investments and repayments during the period (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | |
---|
| | September 30, 2012 | | September 30, 2011 | |
---|
| | Average Carrying Value(2) | | Interest Income/ Expense(3) | | WA Yield/ Financing Cost(4) | | Average Carrying Value(2) | | Interest Income/ Expense(3) | | WA Yield/ Financing Cost(4) | |
---|
Interest-earning assets:(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CRE debt investments | | $ | 1,805,064 | | $ | 37,483 | | | 8.31 | % | $ | 1,822,203 | | $ | 48,425 | | | 10.63 | % |
CRE security investments | | | 2,022,355 | | | 45,075 | | | 8.92 | % | | 2,381,060 | | | 52,257 | | | 8.78 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 3,827,419 | | | 82,558 | | | 8.63 | % | $ | 4,203,263 | | | 100,682 | | | 9.58 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing liabilities:(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CDO bonds payable | | $ | 3,300,964 | | | 11,183 | | | 3.60 | %(5) | $ | 3,916,433 | | | 10,571 | | | 3.54 | %(5) |
Credit facilities | | | 141,232 | | | 977 | | | 2.77 | % | | NA | | | — | | | NA | |
Secured term loan | | | 14,682 | | | 144 | | | 3.92 | % | | 14,682 | | | 144 | | | 3.92 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 3,456,878 | | | 12,304 | | | 3.57 | % | $ | 3,931,115 | | | 10,715 | | | 3.54 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net interest income | | | | | $ | 70,254 | | | | | | | | $ | 89,967 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- (1)
- Excludes $179.7 million and $102.5 million of REO and investments in unconsolidated ventures, net of related financing as of September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
- (2)
- Based on amortized cost for CRE debt and security investments, principal amount for N-Star CDOs, credit facilities and secured term loan and carrying value for the CSE and CapLease CDOs. All are calculated based on quarterly averages.
- (3)
- Includes the effect of amortization of premiums or discounts and deferred fees.
- (4)
- Calculated based on annualized interest income or expense divided by average carrying value.
- (5)
- Weighted average financing cost reflects $18.6 million and $24.1 million of net payments on swaps in our CDO financing transactions reported in unrealized gain (loss) on the statement of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Interest income decreased $18.1 million, primarily attributable to decreased interest income related to the CSE CDO ($16.0 million of which $14.9 million related to discount accretion on debt investments fully repaid, $0.3 million in discount accretion and $1.1 million lower loan related fees offset by $0.3 million of increased interest income) and lower interest income on legacy investments ($10.8 million) offset by increased interest income related to the consolidation of the CapLease CDO ($2.1 million) and new investments ($6.6 million).
Interest expense increased $1.6 million, primarily attributable to additional interest expense related to the CapLease CDO ($1.3 million) and borrowings under our credit facilities ($1.0 million) offset by lower interest expense related to repurchases and principal paydowns of CDO bonds payable ($0.7 million).
80
Table of Contents
Other Revenues
Rental and Escalation Income
Rental and escalation income increased $3.0 million, primarily attributable to higher income related to new REO in our real estate debt segment ($2.2 million) and a net increase in rent and occupancy on properties in our net lease segment ($0.7 million).
Commission Income
Commission income is generated in our asset management business and represents income earned by us for selling equity in NorthStar Income through our broker-dealer subsidiary. The increase of $9.1 million is attributable to our increased capital raising velocity in 2012.
Advisory and Other Fees
Advisory and other fees are generated in our asset management business and increased $1.4 million due to increased fees from managing NorthStar Income.
Expenses
Other Interest Expense
Other interest expense decreased $5.5 million, primarily attributable to principal paydowns on mortgage notes payable in our net lease segment ($6.6 million) offset by increased interest expense related to new exchangeable senior notes at the corporate level ($1.1 million).
Real Estate Properties—Operating Expenses
Real estate properties operating expenses increased $1.6 million, primarily attributable to increased costs related to new REO in our real estate debt segment.
Asset Management Expenses
Asset management expenses decreased $0.6 million and consisted of costs related to managing our real estate debt segment, such as legal and consulting fees for loan modifications and restructurings and acquisition costs related to new investments.
Commission Expense
Commission expense is incurred in our asset management business and represents the fees paid to broker-dealers with whom we have distribution agreements to raise capital in the non-traded REIT market and commissions paid to employees of our broker-dealer. The change corresponds with the increased commission income.
Provision for Loan Losses
Provision for loan losses on our real estate debt portfolio decreased $3.0 million. Provision for loan losses of $6.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 related to two debt investments and included $5.6 million for a mezzanine loan and $0.8 million for a subordinate mortgage interest. Provision for loan losses of $9.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 related to three debt investments and included $9.0 million for subordinated mortgage interests and $0.3 million for a first mortgage loan.
81
Table of Contents
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses are principally incurred at the corporate level except as it relates to compensation expense and other costs incurred at our broker-dealer which is part of the asset management segment.
General and administrative expenses increased by $1.0 million primarily attributable to the following:
Salaries and equity-based compensation expense increased $2.3 million primarily due to a net increase from higher staffing levels to accommodate our new investment activities ($2.0 million), cash compensation for the 2009 long-term incentive plan ($0.4 million) and equity compensation for the 2010 long-term incentive plan ($0.8 million) and the 2011 long-term incentive plan ($0.4 million) offset by the allocation of costs to our advised non-traded REIT ($0.8 million) and a decrease in the amortization of equity compensation in the form of Operating Partnership units structured as profits interests ($0.5 million).
Other general and administrative expenses decreased $1.3 million at the corporate level primarily due to decreased legal fees related to general corporate work and the allocation of costs to our advised non-traded REIT.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense decreased $1.0 million, primarily related to the return of a property to the lender in our net lease segment.
Equity in Earnings (Losses) of Unconsolidated Ventures
Equity in earnings (losses) is generated primarily from investments in our real estate debt segment and increased $1.0 million, primarily attributable to income from new investments ($0.4 million) and decreased losses from legacy equity investments ($0.6 million).
Other Income (Loss)
Other income (loss) of $11.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 related to a loss reserve of $20.0 million related to the Washington Mutual Bank, or WaMu, litigation in our net lease segment offset by $8.2 million of other income from the CSE CDO in our real estate debt segment.
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments and Other
Unrealized (loss) on investments and other is primarily related to the non-cash change in fair value adjustments and the remaining amount is related to net cash payments for interest rate swaps. Changes in fair value related to securities, CDO bonds payable and related derivatives and the associated net cash payments for interest rate swaps is part of the debt and securities segments while changes in fair value and net cash payments for interest rate swaps related to junior subordinated notes are at the corporate level.
For the three months ended September 30, 2012, the $202.0 million unrealized loss primarily related to our debt and securities business and included unrealized losses on CDO bonds payable ($193.7 million) and net cash payments for interest rate swaps ($18.6 million) offset by unrealized gains on our securities portfolio ($24.1 million) and derivative instruments ($6.9 million). The remaining change related to unrealized losses on our junior subordinated notes ($20.7 million).
For the three months ended September 30, 2011, the $68.4 million unrealized loss primarily related to our debt and securities business and included unrealized losses on our securities portfolio
82
Table of Contents
($201.1 million) and derivative instruments ($58.2 million) and net cash payments for interest rate swaps ($24.6 million) offset by unrealized gains on our CDO bonds payable ($162.3 million). The remaining net offsetting change related to unrealized gains on our junior subordinated notes ($55.7 million) and unrealized losses on derivative instruments ($2.5 million) on such junior subordinated notes.
Realized Gain (Loss) on Investments and Other
Realized gains (losses) are principally related to our debt and securities business. Realized gains of $15.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 consisted primarily of net realized gains from the sale of CRE debt and security investments ($10.3 million), gains from the sale of timeshare units ($4.9 million), gain on a termination of an interest rate swap ($7.9 million) and a foreign currency remeasurement gain ($1.1 million) offset by net losses on repurchases of CDO bonds ($5.8 million) and losses related to certain CRE securities ($3.3 million). Realized gains of $14.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 consisted primarily of net realized gains from the sale of CRE debt and security investments ($17.8 million), gains on repurchases of CDO bonds ($0.2 million) and gains from the sale of timeshare units ($0.7 million) offset by foreign currency remeasurement loss ($3.5 million) and losses related to certain CRE securities ($0.8 million).
Gain from Acquisitions
Gain from acquisitions for the three months ended September 30, 2011 relates to the consolidation of the CapLease CDO.
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations
Income (loss) from discontinued operations represents the operations of properties sold or classified as held for sale during the period. For the three months ended September 30, 2012, there was one healthcare property located in Kentucky classified as held for sale in our real estate debt segment. For the three months ended September 30, 2011, properties held for sale included a multifamily property in our real estate debt segment and a leasehold interest in retail space in our net lease segment.
Gain (Loss) on Sale from Discontinued Operations
There were no sales of real estate held for sale for the three months ended September 30, 2012. Gain on sale from discontinued operations for the three months ended September 30, 2011 is primarily related to the sale of a multifamily property located in Georgia.
83
Table of Contents
Comparison of the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 to September 30, 2011 (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, | | Increase (decrease) | |
---|
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | Amount | | % | |
---|
Net interest income | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest income | | $ | 243,367 | | $ | 310,484 | | $ | (67,117 | ) | | (21.6 | )% |
Interest expense on debt and securities | | | 38,569 | | | 32,244 | | | 6,325 | | | 19.6 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net interest income on debt and securities | | | 204,798 | | | 278,240 | | | (73,442 | ) | | (26.4 | )% |
Other revenues | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rental and escalation income | | | 87,619 | | | 85,879 | | | 1,740 | | | 2.0 | % |
Commission income | | | 28,291 | | | 5,775 | | | 22,516 | | | 389.9 | % |
Advisory and other fees | | | 4,766 | | | 425 | | | 4,341 | | | 1,021.4 | % |
Other revenue | | | 1,996 | | | 329 | | | 1,667 | | | 506.7 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total other revenues | | | 122,672 | | | 92,408 | | | 30,264 | | | 32.8 | % |
Expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other interest expense | | | 67,316 | | | 75,257 | | | (7,941 | ) | | (10.6 | )% |
Real estate properties—operating expenses | | | 14,834 | | | 18,649 | | | (3,815 | ) | | (20.5 | )% |
Asset management expenses | | | 2,552 | | | 4,531 | | | (1,979 | ) | | (43.7 | )% |
Commission expense | | | 25,538 | | | 5,117 | | | 20,421 | | | 399.1 | % |
Other costs, net | | | 392 | | | — | | | 392 | | | NM | |
Provision for loan losses | | | 19,737 | | | 48,040 | | | (28,303 | ) | | (58.9 | )% |
Provision for loss on equity investment | | | — | | | 4,482 | | | (4,482 | ) | | (100.0 | )% |
General and administrative | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Salaries and equity-based compensation | | | 41,764 | | | 43,252 | | | (1,488 | ) | | (3.4 | )% |
Other general and administrative | | | 18,671 | | | 21,148 | | | (2,477 | ) | | (11.7 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total general and administrative | | | 60,435 | | | 64,400 | | | (3,965 | ) | | (6.2 | )% |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 36,718 | | | 32,370 | | | 4,348 | | | 13.4 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total expenses | | | 227,522 | | | 252,846 | | | (25,324 | ) | | (10.0 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from operations | | | 99,948 | | | 117,802 | | | (17,854 | ) | | (15.2 | )% |
Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated ventures | | | (416 | ) | | (4,387 | ) | | 3,971 | | | (90.5 | )% |
Other income (loss) | | | 20,258 | | | (1,688 | ) | | 21,946 | | | 1,300.1 | % |
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments and other | | | (413,073 | ) | | (351,271 | ) | | (61,802 | ) | | 17.6 | % |
Realized gain (loss) on investments and other | | | 35,768 | | | 61,937 | | | (26,169 | ) | | (42.3 | )% |
Gain from acquisitions | | | — | | | 81 | | | (81 | ) | | (100.0 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations | | | (257,515 | ) | | (177,526 | ) | | (79,989 | ) | | 45.1 | % |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | | | (88 | ) | | (654 | ) | | 566 | | | (86.5 | )% |
Gain (loss) on sale from discontinued operations | | | 314 | | | 17,328 | | | (17,014 | ) | | (98.2 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (257,289 | ) | $ | (160,852 | ) | $ | (96,437 | ) | | 60.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net Interest Income
Net interest income is generated on our interest-earning assets and related interest-bearing liabilities and is represented in our debt and security segments. For assets financed in a CDO, the CRE debt and security segments are based on the primary collateral of the CDO financing transaction and as such may include other types of investments.
84
Table of Contents
The following table presents the average balance of interest-earning assets and related interest-bearing liabilities, associated interest income and expense and corresponding yield earned and incurred for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Amounts presented have been impacted by the timing of new investments and repayments during the period (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Nine Months Ended | |
---|
| | September 30, 2012 | | September 30, 2011 | |
---|
| | Average Carrying Value(2) | | Interest Income/ Expense(3) | | WA Yield/ Financing Cost(4) | | Average Carrying Value(2) | | Interest Income/ Expense(3) | | WA Yield/ Financing Cost(4) | |
---|
Interest-earning assets:(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CRE debt investments | | $ | 1,751,735 | | $ | 103,445 | | | 7.87 | % | $ | 1,825,322 | | $ | 160,248 | | | 11.71 | % |
CRE security investments | | | 2,147,906 | | | 139,922 | | | 8.69 | % | | 2,424,559 | | | 150,236 | | | 8.26 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 3,899,641 | | | 243,367 | | | 8.32 | % | $ | 4,249,881 | | | 310,484 | | | 9.74 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing liabilities:(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CDO bonds payable | | $ | 3,509,858 | | | 36,132 | | | 3.68% | (5) | $ | 3,961,595 | | | 31,815 | | | 3.57 | % |
Credit facilities | | | 104,137 | | | 2,007 | | | 2.57 | % | | NA | | | — | | | NA | |
Secured term loan | | | 14,682 | | | 430 | | | 3.91 | % | | 14,682 | | | 429 | | | 3.90 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 3,628,677 | | | 38,569 | | | 3.65 | % | $ | 3,976,277 | | | 32,244 | | | 3.57 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net interest income | | | | | $ | 204,798 | | | | | | | | $ | 278,240 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- (1)
- Excludes $179.7 million and $102.5 million of REO and investments in unconsolidated ventures, net of related financing as of September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
- (2)
- Based on amortized cost for CRE debt and security investments, principal amount for N-Star CDOs, credit facilities and secured term loan and carrying value for the CSE and CapLease CDOs. All are calculated based on quarterly averages.
- (3)
- Includes the effect of amortization of premiums or discounts and deferred fees.
- (4)
- Calculated based on annualized interest income or expense divided by average carrying value.
- (5)
- Weighted average financing cost reflects $60.9 million and $74.3 million of net payments on swaps in our CDO financing transactions reported in unrealized gain (loss) on the statement of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Interest income decreased $67.1 million, primarily attributable to decreased interest income related to the CSE CDO ($63.3 million of which $52.7 million related to discount accretion on debt investments fully repaid, $5.8 million of discount accretion, $2.5 million of contractual interest and $2.3 million of loan related fees) and lower interest income on legacy investments ($29.3 million) offset by increased interest income related to the consolidation of the CapLease CDO ($8.4 million) and new investments ($17.2 million).
Interest expense increased $6.3 million, primarily attributable to additional interest expense related to the CapLease CDO ($6.4 million) and borrowings under our credit facilities ($2.0 million) offset by lower interest expense related to repurchases and principal paydowns of CDO bonds payable ($2.1 million).
85
Table of Contents
Other Revenues
Rental and Escalation Income
Rental and escalation income increased $1.7 million, primarily attributable to increases from new REO in our real estate debt segment ($12.4 million) and a net increase in rent and occupancy on properties in our net lease segment ($3.3 million) offset by the deconsolidation of Midwest Care Holdco TRS I LLC ("Midwest Holdings") ($13.0 million) and the return of a property to the lender ($1.0 million) both included in our net lease segment.
Commission Income
Commission income is generated in our asset management business and represents income earned by us for selling equity in NorthStar Income through our broker-dealer subsidiary. The increase of $22.5 million is attributable to our increased capital raising velocity in 2012.
Advisory and Other Fees
Advisory and other fees are generated in our asset management business and increased $4.3 million due to increased fees from managing NorthStar Income.
Expenses
Other Interest Expense
Other interest expense decreased $7.9 million, primarily attributable to principal paydowns on mortgage notes payable on our net lease segment ($13.7 million), the return of a property to the lender in our net lease segment ($1.0 million) offset by additional interest expense related to borrowings associated with new REO in our real estate debt segment ($4.3 million) and new exchangeable senior notes at the corporate level ($2.4 million).
Real Estate Properties—Operating Expenses
Real estate properties operating expenses decreased $3.8 million, primarily attributable to lower costs associated with the deconsolidation of Midwest Holdings ($10.8 million) and the return of a property to the lender in our net lease segment ($0.8 million) offset by new REO in our real estate debt segment ($7.8 million).
Asset Management Expenses
Asset management expenses decreased $2.0 million and consisted of costs related to managing our real estate debt segment, such as legal and consulting fees for loan modifications and restructurings, and acquisition costs related to new investments.
Commission Expense
Commission expense is incurred in our asset management business and represents the fees paid to broker-dealers with whom we have distribution agreements to raise capital in the non-traded REIT market and commissions paid to employees of our broker-dealer. The change corresponds with the increased commission income.
Other Costs, Net
Other costs, net relate to dead deal costs ($2.4 million) incurred at the corporate level offset by a reversal of previously recorded surety bond costs expensed related to the WaMu litigation ($2.0 million) incurred in our net lease segment.
86
Table of Contents
Provision for Loan Losses
Provision for loan losses on our real estate debt portfolio decreased $28.3 million. Provision for loan losses of $19.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 related to six debt investments which includes $17.2 million for mezzanine loans, $2.0 million for subordinated mortgage interests and $0.5 million for first mortgage debt investments. Provision for loan losses of $48.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 related to 11 debt investments which included $28.4 million for mezzanine loans, $18.9 million for subordinated mortgage interests and $0.7 million for first mortgage debt investments.
Provision for Loss on Equity Investment
Provision for loss on equity investment represents an impairment on our joint venture investment in a retail/entertainment complex located in New Jersey in our real estate debt segment.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses are principally incurred at the corporate level except as it relates to compensation and other costs incurred at our broker-dealer which is part of our asset management segment.
General and administrative expenses decreased $4.0 million primarily related to the following:
Salaries and equity-based compensation decreased $1.5 million due to decreases related to the cash compensation for the 2009 long-term incentive plan ($7.4 million), the amortization of equity compensation in the form of Operating Partnership units structured as profits interests ($0.5 million) and the allocation of costs to our advised non-traded REIT ($2.4 million) offset by a net increase in salaries to accommodate our new investment activities ($5.1 million) and equity compensation for the 2010 long-term incentive plan ($2.8 million) and 2011 long-term incentive plan ($0.9 million).
Other general and administrative expenses decreased $2.5 million at the corporate level primarily due to decreased legal fees for general corporate work and the allocation of costs to our advised non-traded REIT.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $4.3 million primarily relating to new REO in our real estate debt segment ($6.2 million) offset by a decrease from the return of a property to the lender ($1.2 million) and accelerated amortization due to a termination of a lease ($0.6 million), both in our net lease segment.
Equity in Earnings (Losses) of Unconsolidated Ventures
Equity in earnings (losses) is primarily generated from investments in our real estate debt segment and increased $4.0 million, primarily attributable to income from new investments ($0.6 million) and decreased losses arising from our legacy equity investments ($3.4 million).
Other Income (Loss)
Other income of $20.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was primarily comprised of a reversal of a loss accrual previously recorded related to the WaMu litigation in our net lease segment. Other loss of $1.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 related to the loss accrual previously recorded related to the WaMu litigation ($20.0 million) in our net lease segment offset by other income ($18.3 million) related to the CSE CDO in our real estate debt segment.
87
Table of Contents
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments and Other
Unrealized (loss) on investments and other is primarily related to the non-cash change in fair value adjustments and the remaining amount represents the net cash payments for the interest rate swaps. Changes in fair value related to securities, CDO bonds payable and related derivatives and the associated net cash payments for interest rate swaps is part of the debt and securities segments while changes in fair value and net cash payments for interest rate swaps related to junior subordinated notes are at the corporate level.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the $413.1 million unrealized loss primarily related to our debt and securities business and included unrealized losses on CDO bonds payable ($403.2 million) and net cash payments for interest rate swaps ($61.2 million) offset by unrealized gains on our securities portfolio ($49.0 million) and derivative instruments ($27.2 million). The remaining change related to unrealized losses on our junior subordinated notes ($24.9 million).
For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the $351.3 million unrealized loss primarily related to our debt and securities business and included unrealized losses on our securities portfolio ($93.6 million), CDO bonds payable ($162.5 million), derivative instruments ($52.6 million) and net cash payments for interest rate swaps ($79.5 million). The remaining net offsetting change related to unrealized gains on our junior subordinated notes ($39.9 million) and unrealized losses on derivative instruments ($3.0 million) on such junior subordinated notes.
Realized Gain (Loss) on Investments and Other
Realized gains (losses) are principally related to our debt and securities business. Realized gains of $35.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 consisted primarily of net realized gains from the sale of CRE debt and security investments ($26.6 million), gains from the sale of timeshare units ($16.1 million), gain on a termination of an interest rate swap ($7.9 million) and gains from the sale of two land parcels ($3.0 million) offset by losses on the repurchases of CDO bonds ($13.9 million), losses related to certain CRE securities ($3.6 million) and foreign currency remeasurement loss ($0.4 million). Realized gains of $61.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 consisted primarily of net realized gains from the sale of certain real estate securities, real estate debt investments and net lease investments ($97.0 million), gains from the sale of timeshare units ($0.7 million) and a foreign currency remeasurement gain ($1.5 million) partially offset by net realized losses on CDO bond payable repurchases ($26.3 million), losses related to certain CRE securities ($7.5 million) and a loss on an interest rate swap termination related to our junior subordinated notes ($2.8 million).
Gain from Acquisitions
Gain from acquisitions for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 relates to the consolidation of the CapLease CDO.
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations
Income (loss) from discontinued operations represents the operations of properties sold or classified as held for sale during the period. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, there was one healthcare property located in Kentucky classified as held for sale. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the (loss) from discontinued operations principally related to a multifamily property in Georgia sold in the third quarter 2011 and part of our real estate debt segment, a portfolio of 18 healthcare net lease assisted living facilities in Wisconsin sold in the second quarter 2011, a leasehold interest in retail space located in New York sold in the first quarter 2011, both part of our net lease segment.
88
Table of Contents
Gain (Loss) on Sale from Discontinued Operations
Gain on sale from discontinued operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 is related to the sale of an office property in Indiana, part of our real estate debt segment. Gain on sale from discontinued operations in 2011 primarily relates to the sale of a portfolio of 18 healthcare net lease assisted living facilities located in Wisconsin ($9.4 million) and the sale of a leasehold interest in retail space located in New York ($5.0 million), both part of our net lease segment and the sale of a multifamily property in Georgia ($2.9 million) in our real estate debt segment.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We require significant capital to fund our investment activities and operating expenses. Our capital sources may include cash flow from operations, net proceeds from asset repayments and sales, borrowings under credit facilities, financings secured by our assets such as mortgage notes, CMBS and CDO bonds, long-term senior and subordinate corporate capital such as senior term loans, senior notes exchangeable into common stock, trust preferred securities and perpetual preferred and common stock.
We seek to meet our long-term liquidity requirements, including the repayment of borrowings and our investment funding needs, through existing cash resources, opportunistic issuances of debt or equity capital, including exchangeable senior notes, our existing CDO financing transactions and the liquidation or refinancing of assets. Nonetheless, our ability to meet a long-term (beyond one year) liquidity requirement may be subject to obtaining additional debt and equity financing. Any decision by our lenders and investors to provide us with financing will depend upon a number of factors, such as our compliance with the terms of our existing credit arrangements, our financial performance, industry or market trends, the general availability of and rates applicable to financing transactions, such lenders' and investors' resources and policies concerning the terms under which they make capital commitments and the relative attractiveness of alternative investment or lending opportunities.
As a REIT, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our annual REIT taxable income to our stockholders, including taxable income where we do not receive corresponding cash, and we intend to distribute all or substantially all of our REIT taxable income in order to comply with the REIT distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code and to avoid federal income tax and the non-deductible excise tax. In the past, we have maintained high unrestricted cash balances relative to the historical difference between our distributions and cash provided by operating activities. On a quarterly basis, our board of directors determines an appropriate common stock dividend based upon numerous factors, including AFFO, REIT qualification requirements, the amount of cash flows provided by operating activities, availability of existing cash balances, borrowing capacity under existing credit agreements, access to cash in the capital markets and other financing sources, our view of our ability to realize gains in the future through appreciation in the value of our assets, general economic conditions and economic conditions that more specifically impact our business or prospects. Future dividend levels are subject to adjustment based upon our evaluation of the factors described above, as well as other factors that our board of directors may, from time-to-time, deem relevant to consider when determining an appropriate common stock dividend.
We currently believe that our existing sources of funds should be adequate for purposes of meeting our short-term liquidity needs. As of September 30, 2012, we had $252 million of unrestricted cash. In August 2012, we received the $26 million of cash posted as collateral in connection with the WaMu litigation and in October 2012 received $3 million of premiums paid for the surety bond. We plan to seek reimbursement of our legal fees incurred in connection with the litigation.
The reinvestment period for our last CDO ended in June 2012. During the reinvestment period, we were allowed to reinvest principal proceeds from the underlying collateral into qualifying replacement collateral without having to repay the liabilities. $190 million of our debt investments have their initial maturity date in the fourth quarter 2012; however, many of these CRE debt investments
89
Table of Contents
contain extension options of at least one year. We also expect that a majority of the debt investments having final maturities for the rest of 2012 may have their maturities extended beyond 2012 with the expectation that future periods will have more attractive economic conditions and cheaper debt capital available for refinancing. It is therefore difficult to estimate the amount of proceeds we will recover from the underlying collateral and since we are past the reinvestment period, such amounts will be used to amortize the senior CDO bonds.
Our CDO financing transactions require that the underlying assets meet a collateral value coverage test, or OC test (as defined by each applicable indenture) in order for us to receive regular cash flow distributions. Rating downgrades and defaults of CMBS and other securities can reduce the deemed value of the security in measuring the OC test, depending upon the level of downgrade. Also, defaults in our CRE debt investments can reduce the OC test. Failing such tests means that cash flow that would normally be distributed to us would be used to amortize the senior CDO bonds until the tests are back in compliance. While we have devoted a significant amount of resources to managing our existing investments, a poor economic environment and additional credit rating downgrades will make maintaining compliance with the CDO financing transactions more difficult. For more details related to our CDO financing OC tests, see "CDO Financing Structures" below.
Principal proceeds received after the reinvestment period and diversion of cash flows from failing OC tests results in delevering of the CDO financing transactions and increasing the weighted average cost of borrowings.
On July 14, 2011, we repaid the $100 million preferred membership interest in NRF Healthcare, LLC to Inland American Real Estate Trust, Inc. which had a 10.5% distribution rate. Such amount was funded using $25 million of proceeds generated from the sale of a healthcare net lease portfolio and $75 million of restricted cash from one of our CDOs.
We have committed to purchase up to $10 million of shares of NorthStar Income's common stock during the period through July 19, 2013, in the event that its distributions to stockholders exceeds its modified funds from operations (as defined in accordance with the current practice guidelines issued by the Investment Program Association). In connection with this commitment, we have purchased 254,778 shares for $2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 resulting in 507,980 aggregate shares acquired for $5 million since inception. In the third quarter 2012, NorthStar Healthcare's registration statement on Form S-11 was declared effective by the SEC. We have committed to purchase up to $10 million of shares of NorthStar Healthcare's common stock on similar terms to NorthStar Income.
CDO Financing Structures
The following table presents our CDO bonds payable owned as of November 2, 2012 (dollars in thousands):
| | | | |
Based on original credit rating: | | Principal Amount(1) | |
---|
AAA | | $ | 178,279 | |
AA through BBB | | | 434,792 | |
Below investment grade | | | 191,790 | |
| | | |
Total(2) | | $ | 804,861 | |
| | | |
Weighted average original credit rating of repurchased CDO bonds | | | A+ / A1 | |
Weighted average purchase price of repurchased CDO bonds(3) | | | 37 | % |
- (1)
- Represents the maximum amount of principal proceeds that could be received.
90
Table of Contents
- (2)
- Unencumbered CDO bonds are owned by us, of which $655 million were repurchased at a discount to par. The majority of CDO bonds owned are eliminated with the liability of the respective CDO on our consolidated financial statements.
- (3)
- $42 million was repurchased at a discount and is included in the weighted average purchase price.
The following table presents our CRE debt CDO financing transactions as of September 30, 2012 (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Issue/Acquisition Date | | N-Star IV Jun-05 | | N-Star VI Mar-06 | | N-Star VIII Dec-06 | | CSE Jul-10 | | CapLease Aug-11 | | Total | |
---|
Balance sheet as of September 30, 2012(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Assets, principal amount | | $ | 381,411 | | $ | 469,276 | | $ | 965,278 | | $ | 1,021,838 | | $ | 167,893 | | $ | 3,005,696 | |
CDO bonds, principal amount(2) | | | 260,893 | | | 361,354 | | | 727,063 | | | 949,218 | | | 148,476 | | | 2,447,004 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets | | $ | 120,518 | | $ | 107,922 | | $ | 238,215 | | $ | 72,620 | | $ | 19,417 | | $ | 558,692 | |
CDO quarterly cash distributions and coverage tests(3) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity notes and retained original below investment grade bonds | | $ | 1,671 | | $ | 989 | | $ | 6,009 | | $ | 6,629 | | $ | 654 | | $ | 15,952 | |
Collateral management fees | | | 287 | | | 471 | | | 1,019 | | | 523 | | | 86 | | | 2,386 | |
Interest coverage cushion(1) | | | 1,710 | | | 1,030 | | | 4,872 | | | 9,952 | | | 412 | | | | |
Overcollateralization cushion (shortfall)(1) | | | 47,917 | | | 57,003 | | | 140,236 | | | 72,782 | | | 8,938 | | | | |
At offering | | | 19,808 | | | 17,412 | | | 42,193 | | | (151,595) | (4) | | 5,987 | (5) | | | |
- (1)
- Based on remittance report issued on date nearest to September 30, 2012.
- (2)
- Includes all outstanding CDO bonds payable to third parties and all CDO bonds owned by us.
- (3)
- Interest coverage, or IC, and OC coverage to the most constrained class.
- (4)
- Based on trustee report as of June 24, 2010, closest to the date of acquisition.
- (5)
- Based on trustee report as of August 31, 2011, closest to the date of acquisition.
91
Table of Contents
The following table presents our CRE security CDO financing transactions as of September 30, 2012 (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Issue/Acquisition Date | | N-Star I Aug-03 | | N-Star II Jul-04 | | N-Star III Mar-05 | | N-Star V Sep-05 | | N-Star VII Jun-06 | | N-Star IX Feb-07 | | Total | |
---|
Balance sheet as of September 30, 2012(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Assets, principal amount | | $ | 159,943 | | $ | 177,990 | | $ | 264,997 | | $ | 409,249 | | $ | 400,316 | | $ | 1,040,151 | | $ | 2,452,646 | |
CDO bonds, principal amount(2) | | | 152,838 | | | 167,700 | | | 179,940 | | | 312,577 | | | 306,751 | | | 742,980 | | | 1,862,786 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets | | $ | 7,105 | | $ | 10,290 | | $ | 85,057 | | $ | 96,672 | | $ | 93,565 | | $ | 297,171 | | $ | 589,860 | |
CDO quarterly cash distributions and coverage tests(3) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity notes and retained original below investment grade bonds | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 2,568 | | $ | 2,568 | |
Collateral management fees | | | 60 | | | 62 | | | 88 | | | 91 | | | 82 | | | 776 | | | 1,159 | |
Interest coverage cushion (shortfall)(1) | | | NEG | | | 1,043 | | | 429 | | | NEG | | | NEG | | | 2,972 | | | | |
Overcollateralization cushion (shortfall)(1) | | | NEG | | | NEG | | | NEG | | | NEG | | | NEG | | | 43,500 | | | | |
At offering | | | 8,687 | | | 10,944 | | | 13,610 | | | 12,940 | | | 13,966 | | | 24,516 | | | | |
- (1)
- Based on remittance report issued on date nearest to September 30, 2012.
- (2)
- Includes all outstanding CDO bonds payable to third parties and all CDO bonds owned by us.
- (3)
- IC and OC coverage to the most constrained class.
The reinvestment period for our last CDO ended in June 2012. At the end of the reinvestment period, our ability to maintain the OC and IC tests may be negatively impacted since we will not be able to reinvest principal in these CDOs. If the OC and IC tests are not met with respect to any of our CDOs, periodic cash distributions would be diverted to amortize the senior bonds until the CDO is back in compliance with the tests. In such cases, this could decrease cash available to pay our dividend and affect compliance with REIT requirements.
Our CDOs are collateralized by CRE debt and securities, with a majority of our equity invested in our CRE debt CDOs. The CRE debt CDOs currently have larger OC cushions compared to the CRE securities CDOs. CRE debt investments are not subject to rating agency downgrades in calculating the OC tests, and as these investments were primarily directly originated by us, it provides for more control than a CMBS.
Currently, all of the N-Star CRE debt CDOs are in compliance with their OC and IC tests. Five of our N-Star securities CDOs (I, II, III, V and VII) are out of compliance with their respective OC tests and we expect that complying with OC and IC tests will continue to be difficult.
Capital Raise
For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we raised net proceeds of $206 million from the issuance of common stock, $142 million from the issuance of preferred stock (including $37 million through an "at-the-market" preferred stock offering program) and $79 million from the issuance of
92
Table of Contents
exchangeable senior notes. Subsequent to quarter end, we raised net proceeds of $121 million from the issuance of preferred stock. Total capital raised year to date is $548 million.
CMBS Facility
In October 2011, we entered into a credit facility that provides for $100 million to finance the acquisition of AAA-rated CMBS and has an initial term of two years with a one-year extension option at our election subject to the satisfaction of certain customary conditions. Borrowings accrue interest at a per annum pricing rate equal to 1.65%, subject to adjustment.
As of September 30, 2012, we held $45 million principal amount of CMBS with a weighted average current yield of 3.9% financed with $40 million at a weighted average financing cost over the expected life of 1.8%, resulting in an expected return on invested equity of approximately 19%. There is no assurance we will realize this expected return on invested equity over the term of these investments. Our actual return on invested equity could vary significantly from our expectations.
Loan Facilities
In November 2011 and July 2012, we entered into two separate credit facilities that provide an aggregate of $140 million to finance the origination of first mortgage loans and senior loan participations secured by commercial real estate. The interest rate and advance rate depend on asset type and characteristic. Initial maturity dates for these facilities range from November 2013 to July 2015 and both have extensions available at our option, subject to the satisfaction of customary conditions, with maturity dates extending through July 2018.
As of September 30, 2012, we held $179 million principal amount of CRE debt investments financed with $110 million from the loan facilities, resulting in an expected return on invested equity of approximately 18%. There is no assurance we will realize this expected return on invested equity over the term of these investments. Our actual return on invested equity could vary significantly from our expectations.
Summary of Credit Facilities
Our CMBS and loan facilities contain representations, warranties, covenants, conditions precedent to funding, events of default and indemnities that are customary for agreements of this type. We are currently in compliance with all of our financial covenants.
Cash Flows
Nine months Ended September 30, 2012 Compared to September 30, 2011
Net cash provided by operating activities was $65 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $39 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The increase was primarily due to new investment activity.
Net cash provided by investing activities was $169 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $352 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The decrease in net cash provided was primarily due to lower proceeds from the sale/repayment of operating real estate and CRE debt investments offset by a net increase in proceeds from the sale/repayment/acquisition of CRE security investments and new CRE debt investments.
93
Table of Contents
Net cash used in financing activities was $126 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $400 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The primary outflows of cash for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $584 million for net repurchase/repayments of CDO bonds, $20 million for swap activities and $74 million for payment of dividends (common and preferred) offset by $422 million from net new capital, $84 million of net new borrowings and $26 million from the return of the surety bond related to the WaMu litigation. The primary outflows of cash for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $240 million for net repurchases/repayments of CDO bonds, $221 million for net repayments of mortgage notes and term loans, $12 million for net swap activities, $100 million from the repayment of the preferred interest in NRF Healthcare, LLC, $43 million for payment of dividends (common and preferred) and $26 million for the issuance of the surety bond related to the WaMu litigation offset by $191 million from net new capital.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have the following arrangements which do not meet the definition of off-balance sheet arrangements, but do have some of the characteristics of off-balance sheet arrangements. We have made investments in various unconsolidated ventures. See "Note 8. Investment in and Advances to Unconsolidated Ventures" for a discussion of such unconsolidated ventures in our consolidated financial statements. In each case, our exposure to loss is limited to the carrying value of our investment.
Related Party Transactions
Advisory and Other Fees
We have agreements with each of our N-Star CDOs and the CSE and CapLease CDOs to perform certain advisory services. The advisory fee related to all of the CDO financing transactions is eliminated as a result of the consolidation of the respective CDO financing transaction. For the three months ended September 30, 2012, we earned $4 million in advisory fee income that was eliminated in consolidation.
We have an agreement with NorthStar Income to manage its day-to-day affairs, including identifying, originating and acquiring investments on behalf of NorthStar Income and we earn fees for our services. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, we earned $5 million and $0.4 million of fees on these agreements, respectively. Additionally, we incur direct and indirect costs on behalf of NorthStar Income and NorthStar Healthcare which are reimbursed subsequently to us by these managed entities. As of September 30, 2012, we had aggregate unreimbursed costs of $8 million from NorthStar Income and NorthStar Healthcare.
Purchase of Non-traded REIT Common Stock
We have committed to purchase up to $10 million of shares of NorthStar Income's common stock during the period through July 19, 2013, in the event that NorthStar Income's distributions to stockholders exceeds its modified funds from operations (as defined in accordance with the current practice guidelines issued by the Investment Program Association). In connection with this commitment, we have purchased 254,778 shares for $2.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 resulting in 507,980 aggregate shares acquired for $4.6 million since inception. We have also committed to purchase up to $10 million of shares of NorthStar Healthcare's common stock on similar terms to NorthStar Income. As of September 30, 2012, we have not purchased shares of NorthStar Healthcare common stock related to this commitment.
94
Table of Contents
Legacy Fund
We have two CRE debt investments with a subsidiary of Legacy Partners Realty Fund I, LLC, or the Legacy Fund, as borrower. One loan of $16 million matures in March 2013 and has two one-year extension options. The interest rate is one-month LIBOR plus 7.50%, of which one-month LIBOR plus 3.00% is current pay. The other loan of $23 million has a maturity in January 2015 and has an interest rate of one-month LIBOR plus 3.50%. We earned an aggregate $2 million and $1 million of interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. One of our directors, Preston Butcher, is the chairman of the board of directors and chief executive officer and owns a significant interest in Legacy Partners Commercial, LLC, which indirectly owns an equity interest in, and owns the manager of, the Legacy Fund. In addition, we lease office space in Colorado with an affiliate of the Legacy Fund under an operating lease with annual lease payments of approximately $0.1 million through December 31, 2015. We have the option to renew the lease for an additional five years.
Hard Rock Hotel Loan
We own an $89 million principal amount of a mezzanine loan backed by the Hard Rock Hotel and Casino in Las Vegas, Nevada. Prior to a modification of the loan in March 2011, Morgans Hotel Group, or Morgans, was a minority partner in the joint venture owning the hotel. David Hamamoto, our chairman and chief executive officer, is the executive chairman of the board of Morgans. Morgans no longer has any interest in the hotel.
NorthStar CMBS Financing Transaction
As part of the NorthStar CMBS Financing Transaction, we will contribute five real estate debt investments with a $152 million aggregate principal amount and retain an equity interest of $54 million. NorthStar Income will contribute nine real estate debt investments with a $199 million aggregate principal amount and retain an equity interest of $69 million. In connection with this transaction, since we and NorthStar Income will both be contributing assets into a single securitization, we will enter into an agreement with NorthStar Income that provides that we will both receive the economic benefit and bear the economic risk associated with the investments we each will be contributing into the securitization. In both cases, our respective retained interest will be subordinate to interests of the senior bondholders. In the unlikely event that we or NorthStar Income suffer a complete loss of our retained interests, any additional losses would be borne by the remaining retained interests held by us or NorthStar Income, as the case may be, prior to the senior bondholders. We will maintain effective control of our retained interest in the contributed assets.
Recent Developments
Dividends
On November 1, 2012, we declared a dividend of $0.17 per share of common stock. The common stock dividend will be paid on November 16, 2012 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on November 12, 2012. On November 1, 2012, we declared a dividend of $0.54688 per share of Series A preferred stock and $0.51563 per share of Series B preferred stock. The Series A and Series B preferred dividends will be paid on November 15, 2012, to the stockholders of record as of the close of business on November 12, 2012.
Preferred Stock Issuance
In October 2012, we completed the sale of 5.0 million shares of our new 8.875% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock for net proceeds of $121.0 million. The preferred stock is currently redeemable by us at a redemption price of $25.00 per share.
95
Table of Contents
NorthStar CMBS Financing Transaction
On October 26, 2012, we priced the $351 million NorthStar CMBS Financing Transaction collateralized by CRE debt investments originated by us and on behalf of NorthStar Income that is expected to close in November 2012. A total of $228 million of bonds will be issued representing an advance rate of 65% and a weighted average coupon of LIBOR plus 1.63%. We will contribute five real estate debt investments with a $152 million aggregate principal amount and retain an equity interest of $54 million. We expect to generate an approximate 20% yield on our invested equity, inclusive of fees and estimated transaction expenses. There is no assurance we will realize this expected return on invested equity over the term of these investments. Our actual return on invested equity could vary significantly from its expectations. We plan to use the proceeds to repay $95 million of borrowings on our credit facilities.
Inflation
We believe that most inflationary increases in expenses will be offset by the expense reimbursements and contractual rent increases described below assuming we maintain high occupancy. The tenant/operator leases to our net lease properties are either:
- •
- net leases where the tenants/operators are responsible for all or a significant portion of the real estate taxes, insurance and operating expenses and the leases provide for increases in rent either based on changes in the Consumer Price Index, or CPI, or pre-negotiated increases; or
- •
- operating leases which provide for separate escalations of real estate taxes and operating expenses over a base amount, and/or increases in the base rent based on changes in the CPI.
We believe that the risk associated with an increase in market interest rates on the floating-rate debt used to finance our assets in our CDO financing transactions and our direct investments in CRE debt will be largely offset by our strategy of matching the terms of our assets with the terms of our liabilities and through our use of hedging instruments.
Refer to Item 3. "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk" for additional details.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Funds from Operations and Adjusted Funds from Operations
Management believes that funds from operations, or FFO, and AFFO, each of which is a non-GAAP measure, are additional appropriate measures of the operating performance of a REIT and of us in particular. We compute FFO in accordance with the standards established by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, as net income or loss (computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles), excluding gains or losses from sales of depreciable properties, the cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles, real estate-related depreciation and amortization, impairment charges on depreciable property owned directly or indirectly and after adjustments for unconsolidated ventures. FFO, as defined by NAREIT, is a computation made by analysts and investors to measure a real estate company's cash flow generated by operations.
We calculate AFFO by subtracting from (or adding to) FFO:
- •
- normalized recurring expenditures that are capitalized by us and then amortized, but which are necessary to maintain our properties and revenue stream, e.g., leasing commissions and tenant improvement allowances;
- •
- an adjustment to reverse the effects of the straight-lining of rent income and expense and fair value lease revenue;
96
Table of Contents
- •
- the amortization or accrual of various deferred costs including intangible assets and equity-based compensation;
- •
- an adjustment to reverse the effects of unrealized gains (losses); and
- •
- an adjustment to reverse the effects of acquisition gains or losses.
Our calculation of AFFO differs from the methodology used for calculating AFFO by certain other REITs and, accordingly, our AFFO may not be comparable to AFFO reported by other REITs. Our management utilizes FFO and AFFO as measures of our operating performance, and believes they are also useful to investors, because they facilitate an understanding of our operating performance after adjustment for certain non-cash expenses, such as real estate depreciation, which assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time and, in the case of AFFO, equity-based compensation. Additionally, FFO and AFFO serve as measures of our operating performance because they facilitate evaluation of our company without the effects of selected items required in accordance with U.S. GAAP that may not necessarily be indicative of current operating performance and that may not accurately compare our operating performance between periods. Furthermore, although FFO, AFFO and other supplemental performance measures are defined in various ways throughout the REIT industry, we also believe that FFO and AFFO may provide us and our investors with an additional useful measure to compare our financial performance to certain other REITs.
Neither FFO nor AFFO is equivalent to net income or cash generated from operating activities determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Furthermore, FFO and AFFO do not represent amounts available for management's discretionary use because of needed capital replacement or expansion, debt service obligations or other commitments or uncertainties. Neither FFO nor AFFO should be considered as an alternative to net income as an indicator of our operating performance or as an alternative to cash flow from operating activities as a measure of our liquidity.
97
Table of Contents
Set forth below is a reconciliation of FFO and AFFO to income (loss) from continuing operations before non-controlling interest in our Operating Partnership for three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
---|
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 | |
---|
Funds from operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations | | $ | (150,617 | ) | $ | (23,734 | ) | $ | (257,515 | ) | $ | (177,526 | ) |
Non-controlling interests(1) | | | 645 | | | 658 | | | 1,185 | | | (7,737 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) before non-controlling interest in Operating Partnership | | | (149,972 | ) | | (23,076 | ) | | (256,330 | ) | | (185,263 | ) |
Adjustments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock dividends | | | (6,671 | ) | | (5,231 | ) | | (17,629 | ) | | (15,694 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 10,423 | | | 12,762 | | | 32,581 | | | 32,370 | |
Funds from discontinued operations | | | (23 | ) | | (16 | ) | | (82 | ) | | 138 | |
Real estate depreciation and amortization, unconsolidated ventures | | | 207 | | | 207 | | | 621 | | | 646 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Funds from operations | | | (146,036 | ) | | (15,354 | ) | | (240,839 | ) | | (167,803 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Adjusted funds from operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Funds from operations | | | (146,036 | ) | | (15,354 | ) | | (240,839 | ) | | (167,803 | ) |
Straight-line rental income, net | | | (749 | ) | | (678 | ) | | (2,106 | ) | | (1,910 | ) |
Straight-line rental income/expense and fair value lease revenue, unconsolidated ventures | | | 237 | | | (32 | ) | | 702 | | | (84 | ) |
Amortization of above/below market leases | | | (347 | ) | | (272 | ) | | (865 | ) | | (656 | ) |
Amortization of equity-based compensation | | | 2,891 | | | 2,204 | | | 10,049 | | | 6,851 | |
Unrealized (gain) loss from fair value adjustments | | | 183,467 | | | 43,537 | | | 351,812 | | | 270,001 | |
Gain from acquisitions | | | — | | | (81 | ) | | — | | | (81 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Adjusted funds from operations | | $ | 39,463 | | $ | 29,324 | | $ | 118,753 | | $ | 106,318 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
- (1)
- Amount excludes non-controlling limited partner interest in our Operating Partnership.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are primarily subject to interest rate risk and credit risk. These risks are dependent on various factors beyond our control, including monetary and fiscal policies, domestic and international economic conditions and political considerations. Our market risk sensitive assets, liabilities and related derivative positions are held for investment and not for trading purposes.
Interest Rate Risk
Changes in interest rates affect our net interest income, which is the difference between the income earned on assets and the interest expense incurred in connection with our borrowings and hedges.
Our debt and security investments bear interest at either a floating or fixed rate. The interest rates on our floating-rate assets typically float at a fixed spread over an index such as LIBOR and typically reprice every 30 days based on LIBOR in effect at the time. Given the frequent and periodic repricing of our floating-rate assets, changes in benchmark interest rates are unlikely to materially affect the value of our floating-rate portfolio. Changes in short-term rates will, however, affect income from these
98
Table of Contents
investments. Many of our new loan originations have a LIBOR floor which is in excess of current LIBOR.
Our general financing strategy has focused on the use of "match-funded" structures. This means that we seek to align the maturities of our liabilities with the maturities on our assets as closely as possible in order to manage the risks of being forced to refinance our liabilities prior to the maturities of our assets. Substantially all of our investments are financed with either non-recourse CDO borrowings or non-recourse mortgage notes. In addition, we seek to match interest rates on our assets with like-kind borrowings, so fixed-rate assets are financed with fixed-rate borrowings and floating-rate assets are financed with floating-rate borrowings, directly or indirectly, through the use of interest rate swaps, caps and other financial instruments or through a combination of these strategies. As of September 30, 2012, a hypothetical 100 basis point increase in interest rates applied to our variable-rate assets would increase annual interest income by $23 million offset by an increase in interest expense of $25 million on our variable-rate liabilities.
Changes in interest rates could affect the value of our fixed-rate CRE debt and security investments and our net lease properties. For example, increasing interest rates would result in a higher required yield on investments, which would decrease the value on existing fixed-rate assets in order to adjust their yields to current market levels. In addition, the value of our net lease properties may be influenced by changes in interest rates and credit spreads (as discussed below) because value is typically derived by discounting expected future cash flows generated by the property using interest rates (such as the 10-year U.S. Treasury Note yield) plus a risk premium based on the property type and creditworthiness of the tenants/operators. Lower risk-free rates generally result in lower discount rates and, therefore, higher valuations, and vice versa, although the scarcity of financing for net lease properties and investor concerns over commercial real estate generally have recently decreased commercial real estate valuations, including valuations for net lease properties.
Changes in interest rates and credit spreads may also impact our net book value as almost all of our investments in CRE securities are marked-to-market each quarter with changes in fair value reflected in unrealized gains (losses). Generally, as interest rates increase, the value of fixed-rate securities within our CDO financing transaction, such as CMBS, decreases and as interest rates decrease, the value of these securities will increase. Conversely, we mark almost all of our CDO bonds payable and all related interest rate swaps to market which may cause a partial offset to the income and balance sheet impact of marking the CRE securities to market. Additionally, changes in unrealized gains (losses) do not directly affect our operating cash flows or our ability to pay a dividend to stockholders. Changes in fair value of our CRE securities portfolio could impact our ability to realize gains on such securities.
We use derivative instruments primarily to manage interest rate exposure. These derivatives are typically in the form of interest rate swap agreements and the primary objective is to minimize interest rate risks associated with our investments and financing activities. The counterparties of these arrangements are major financial institutions with which we may also have other financial relationships. We are exposed to credit risk in the event of non-performance by these counterparties and we monitor their financial condition. As of September 30, 2012, our counterparties do not hold any cash margin as collateral against our swap contracts. As of September 30, 2012, all of our derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment, therefore, gains (losses) resulting from their fair value measurement at the end of each reporting period are recognized as an increase or decrease in unrealized gain (loss) on investments and other in our consolidated statements of operations. In addition, we are, and may in the future be, subject to additional expense based on the notional amount of the derivative and a specified spread over the applicable LIBOR. Because the fair value of these instruments can vary significantly between periods, we may experience significant fluctuations in the amount of our unrealized gain (loss) in any given period. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we recognized $27 million of unrealized gains from derivatives from fair value adjustments.
99
Table of Contents
Credit Spread Risk
The value of our fixed and floating-rate investments also change with market credit spreads. This means that when market-demanded risk premiums, or credit spreads, increase, the value of our fixed- and floating-rate assets decrease and vice versa. The fixed-rate securities, debt investments and net lease properties are valued based on a market credit spread over the rate payable on fixed rate U.S. Treasury of like maturity. This means that their value is dependent on the yield demanded on such assets by the market, based on their credit relative to U.S. Treasuries. The floating-rate CRE debt and security investments are valued based on a market credit spread over the applicable LIBOR. Excessive supply of these investments combined with reduced demand will generally cause the market to require a higher yield on these investments, resulting in the use of a higher or "wider" spread over the benchmark rate (usually the applicable U.S. Treasury yield) to value these assets. Under these conditions, the value of our portfolio should decrease. Conversely, if the spread used to value these assets were to decrease or "tighten," the value of these assets should increase.
Market credit spreads are currently much wider than existed at the time we originated or acquired a majority of our investments. These market spreads imply that investment for which we did not elect fair value option, primarily our CRE debt and net lease investments, may be worth less than the amounts at which we carry these investments on our consolidated balance sheet. However, we typically financed these investments with borrowings priced in similar credit environment and intend to hold them to maturity, and, therefore, we do not believe that intra- and inter-period changes in value caused by changing credit spreads materially impacts the economics associated with our investment.
Credit Risk
Credit risk in our CRE debt and security investments relates to each individual borrower's ability to make required interest and principal payments on scheduled due dates. We seek to manage credit risk through a comprehensive credit analysis prior to making an investment, actively monitoring our asset portfolio and the underlying credit quality of our holdings and subordination and diversification of our portfolio. Our analysis is based on a broad range of real estate, financial, economic and borrower-related factors which we believe are critical to the evaluation of credit risk inherent in a transaction.
CMBS investments financed with our CMBS Facility are AAA-rated while most of our other CMBS investments are generally junior in right of payment of interest and principal to one or more senior classes, but benefit from the support of one or more subordinate classes of securities or other form of credit support within a securitization transaction. The senior unsecured REIT debt we invest in reflects comparable credit risk. The underlying CRE securities to our CDO note investments are diversified by asset type, industry, location and issuer. We further seek to minimize credit risk by monitoring the CDO note investments and the underlying credit quality of their holdings. Our debt investments are collateral dependent, meaning the principal source of repayment is from a sale or refinancing of the collateral securing our debt. In the event that a borrower cannot repay our debt, we may exercise our remedies under the debt agreements, which may include taking title to the collateral. We describe many of the options available to us in this situation in the "Risk Management" section of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. To the extent the value of our collateral exceeds the amount of our debt (including all debt senior to us) and the expense we incur in collecting the debt, we would collect 100% of our debt amount. To the extent the amount of our debt investments plus all senior debt to our position exceeds the realizable value to our collateral, then we would incur a loss.
We are subject to the credit risk of the corporate lessee of our net lease properties including the operators of healthcare properties. We undertake a rigorous credit evaluation of each tenant and healthcare operator prior to acquiring net lease properties. This analysis includes an extensive due diligence investigation of the tenant/operator's business as well as an assessment of the strategic importance of the underlying real estate to the tenant/operator's core business operations. Where
100
Table of Contents
appropriate, we may seek to augment the tenant/operator's commitment to the facility by structuring various credit enhancement mechanisms into the underlying leases. These mechanisms could include security deposit requirements or guaranties from entities we deem creditworthy. In addition, we actively monitor lease coverage at each facility within our healthcare portfolio. However, a portion of our portfolio derives revenues from government sources, notably Medicaid or Medicare. Recently announced and potential future changes to these programs may have a material impact on the valuation and financial performance of this portion of our portfolio.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, our management conducted an evaluation (as required under Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that it will detect or uncover failures to disclose material information otherwise required to be set forth in our periodic reports.
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Changes in internal control over financial reporting
There have not been any changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
We are involved in various litigation matters arising in the ordinary course of our business. Although we are unable to predict with certainty the eventual outcome of any litigation, in the opinion of management, our legal proceedings are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.
101
Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits
| | | |
Exhibit Number | | Description of Exhibit |
---|
| 3.1 | | Articles of Amendment and Restatement of NorthStar Realty Finance Corp., as filed with the State Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland on October 20, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-114675)) |
| 3.2 | | Amended and Restated Bylaws of NorthStar Realty Finance Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011) |
| 3.3 | | Articles Supplementary Classifying NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s 8.75% Series A Preferred Stock, liquidation preference $25.00 per share (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Registration Statement on Form 8-A, dated September 14, 2006) |
| 3.4 | | Articles Supplementary Classifying NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s 8.25% Series B Preferred Stock, liquidation preference $25.00 per share (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Registration Statement on Form 8-A, dated February 7, 2007) |
| 3.5 | | Articles Supplementary Classifying and Designating Additional Shares of NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s 8.25% Series B Preferred Stock, liquidation preference $25.00 per share (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.6 to NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007) |
| 3.6 | | Articles Supplementary Classifying and Designating Additional Shares of NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s 8.25% Series B Preferred Stock, liquidation preference $25.00 per share (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 19, 2012) |
| 3.7 | | Articles Supplementary Classifying and Designating Additional Shares of NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s 8.75% Series A Preferred Stock, liquidation preference $25.00 per share and 8.25% Series B Preferred Stock, liquidation preference $25.00 per share (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 13, 2012) |
| 3.8 | | Articles Supplementary Classifying and Designating Additional Shares of NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s 8.25% Series B Preferred Stock, liquidation preference $25.00 per share (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 13, 2012) |
| 3.9 | | Articles Supplementary Classifying NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s 8.875% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, liquidation preference $25.00 per share (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Registration Statement on Form 8-A, dated October 5, 2012) |
| 4.1 | | Registration Rights Agreement relating to the 7.25% Exchangeable Senior Notes due 2027 of NorthStar Realty Finance Limited Partnership, dated June 18, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-146679)) |
102
Table of Contents
| | | |
Exhibit Number | | Description of Exhibit |
---|
| 4.2 | | Indenture dated as of June 18, 2007, among NorthStar Realty Finance Limited Partnership, as Issuer, NorthStar Realty Finance Corp., as Guarantor, and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 22, 2007) |
| 4.3 | | Registration Rights Agreement relating to the 11.50% Exchangeable Senior Notes due 2013 of NRFC NNN Holdings, LLC, dated May 28, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-152545)) |
| 4.4 | | Indenture dated as of May 28, 2008, among NRFC NNN Holdings, LLC, as Issuer, NorthStar Realty Finance Corp., NorthStar Realty Finance Limited Partnership, and NRFC Sub-REIT Corp., as Guarantors, and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 28, 2008) |
| 4.5 | | Registration Rights Agreement relating to the 7.50% Exchangeable Senior Notes due 2031 of NorthStar Realty Finance Limited Partnership dated as of March 9, 2011, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 9, 2011) |
| 4.6 | | Indenture dated as of March 9, 2011, among NorthStar Realty Finance Limited Partnership, as Issuer, NorthStar Realty Finance Corp. and NRFC Sub-REIT Corp., as Guarantors, and Wilmington Trust FSB, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 9, 2011) |
| 4.7 | | Registration Rights Agreement relating to the 8.875% Exchangeable Senior Notes due 2032 of NorthStar Realty Finance Limited Partnership, dated as of June 12, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 12, 2012) |
| 4.8 | | Indenture dated as of June 12, 2012, among NorthStar Realty Finance Limited Partnership, as Issuer, NorthStar Realty Finance Corp. and NRFC Sub-REIT Corp., as Guarantors, and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 12, 2012) |
| 10.1 | | Agreement of Limited Partnership of NorthStar Realty Finance Limited Partnership, dated as of October 19, 2004, by and among NorthStar Realty Finance Corp., as sole general partner and initial limited partner and the other limited partners a party thereto from time-to-time (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004) |
| 10.2 | | NorthStar Realty Finance Corp. 2004 Long-Term Incentive Bonus Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004) |
| 10.3 | | Amendment No. 1 to Agreement of Limited Partnership of NorthStar Realty Finance Limited Partnership, dated as of March 14, 2006, by and among NorthStar Realty Finance Corp., as sole general partner and initial limited partner and the other limited partners a party thereto from time-to-time (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005) |
103
Table of Contents
| | | |
Exhibit Number | | Description of Exhibit |
---|
| 10.4 | | Second Amendment to the Agreement of Limited Partnership of NorthStar Realty Finance Limited Partnership, dated as of September 14, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 14, 2006) |
| 10.5 | | Third Amendment to the Agreement of Limited Partnership of NorthStar Realty Finance Limited Partnership, dated as of February 7, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 9, 2007) |
| 10.6 | | Fourth Amendment to the Agreement of Limited Partnership of NorthStar Realty Finance Limited Partnership, dated as of May 24, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 29, 2007) |
| 10.7 | + | Executive Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, dated as of October 4, 2007, between NorthStar Realty Finance Corp. and David T. Hamamoto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 5, 2007) |
| 10.8 | + | Executive Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, dated as of October 4, 2007, between NorthStar Realty Finance Corp. and Daniel R. Gilbert (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to the NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 5, 2007) |
| 10.9 | + | Executive Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, dated as of October 4, 2007, between NorthStar Realty Finance Corp. and Albert Tylis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 27, 2009) |
| 10.10 | | Fifth Amendment to the Agreement of Limited Partnership of NorthStar Realty Finance Limited Partnership, dated as of May 29, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008) |
| 10.11 | + | NorthStar Realty Finance Corp. Executive Incentive Bonus Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009) |
| 10.12 | | Common Stock Purchase Warrant, Certificate No. W-1, dated October 28, 2009, issued to Wachovia Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009) |
| 10.13 | | Common Stock Purchase Warrant, Certificate No. W-2, dated October 28, 2009, issued to Wachovia Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009) |
| 10.14 | | Common Stock Purchase Warrant, Certificate No. W-3, dated October 28, 2009, issued to Wachovia Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.38 to NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009) |
| 10.15 | | Common Stock Purchase Warrant, Certificate No. W-4, dated June 30, 2010, issued to Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010) |
104
Table of Contents
| | | |
Exhibit Number | | Description of Exhibit |
---|
| 10.16 | + | Amendment to the NorthStar Realty Finance Corp. Executive Incentive Bonus Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011) |
| 10.17 | + | Form of Amended and Restated Indemnification Agreement for directors and officers of NorthStar Realty Finance Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011) |
| 10.18 | + | Executive Employment Agreement, dated as of April 29, 2011, between NorthStar Realty Finance Corp. and Debra A. Hess (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011) |
| 10.19 | | Master Repurchase and Securities Contract, dated as of October 28, 2011, by and between NRFC WF CMBS, LLC, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011) |
| 10.20 | | Guaranty Agreement, made as of October 28, 2011, by NorthStar Realty Finance Corp., NorthStar Realty Finance Limited Partnership and NRFC Sub-REIT Corp. in favor of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011) |
| 10.21 | | Master Repurchase and Securities Contract, dated as of November 22, 2011, by and between NRFC WF Loan, LLC, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011) |
| 10.22 | | Limited Guaranty, made as of November 22, 2011, by NorthStar Realty Finance Corp. and NorthStar Realty Finance Limited Partnership for the benefit of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011) |
| 10.23 | + | Sixth Amendment to the Agreement of Limited Partnership of NorthStar Realty Finance Limited Partnership, dated as of March 21, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012) |
| 10.24 | | Amended and Restated 2004 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan of NorthStar Realty Finance Corp. (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed April 20, 2012) |
| 10.25 | | Seventh Amendment to the Agreement of Limited Partnership of NorthStar Realty Finance Limited Partnership, dated as of June 12, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 13, 2012) |
| 10.26 | + | Executive Employment Agreement, dated as of April 18, 2012, between NorthStar Realty Finance Corp. and Ronald J. Lieberman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012) |
| 10.27 | | Omnibus Amendment to Repurchase Documents by and between NRFC WF Loan, LLC, as Seller, and Wells Fargo, National Association, as Buyer, Custodian, Servicer, Guarantor and Pledgor, dated as of April 13, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012) |
105
Table of Contents
| | | |
Exhibit Number | | Description of Exhibit |
---|
| 31.1 | * | Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| 31.2 | * | Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| 32.1 | * | Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| 32.2 | * | Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| 101 | ** | The following materials from the NorthStar Realty Finance Corp. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2012 (unaudited) and December 31, 2011; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) (unaudited) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Equity as of September 30, 2012 (unaudited) and December 31, 2011; (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011; and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) |
- *
- Filed herewith
- **
- Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.
- +
- Denotes management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit hereto.
106
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | | | |
| | NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP. |
Date: November 8, 2012 | | By: | | /s/ DAVID T. HAMAMOTO
David T. Hamamoto Chief Executive Officer |
| | By: | | /s/ DEBRA A. HESS
Debra A. Hess Chief Financial Officer |
107