Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities | 3. Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities The Company’s financial instruments consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable, accounts payable and short-term and long-term debt. Cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and accounts receivable, net of allowance, are reported at their respective fair values on the consolidated balance sheets. Short-term and long-term debt are reported at their amortized cost on the consolidated balance sheets. The remaining financial instruments are reported on the consolidated balance sheets at amounts that approximate current fair values. The amortized cost and fair value of assets, along with gross unrealized gains and losses, were as follows (in thousands): Cash, Cash Equivalents, Short-term Investments and Restricted Cash Balance Sheet Classification Gross Gross Cash and Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Fair cash Short-term Restricted Cost Gains Losses Value Equivalents Investments Cash June 30, 2015: Cash $ 11,281 $ — $ — $ 11,281 $ 11,281 $ — $ — Money market funds 34,332 — — 34,332 28,952 — 5,380 Corporate equity securities 1,572 (141 ) — 1,431 — 1,431 — $ 47,185 $ (141 ) $ — $ 47,044 $ 40,233 $ 1,431 $ 5,380 December 31, 2014: Cash $ 3,586 $ — $ — $ 3,586 $ 3,586 $ — $ — Money market funds 26,318 — — 26,318 20,942 — 5,376 Corporate equity securities 1,572 401 — 1,973 — 1,973 — $ 31,476 $ 401 $ — $ 31,877 $ 24,528 $ 1,973 $ 5,376 Fair Value Measurements The fair value hierarchy of the Company’s assets that are measured at fair value, by level, is as follows (in thousands): Fair Value Measurements Using Quoted Prices in Significant other Active Markets for Observable Unobservable Identical Assets Inputs Inputs (Level 1 Inputs) (Level 2 Inputs) (Level 3 Inputs) Total June 30, 2015: Money market funds $ 34,332 $ — $ — $ 34,332 Corporate equity securities 1,431 — — 1,431 $ 35,763 $ — $ — $ 35,763 December 31, 2014: Money market funds $ 26,318 $ — $ — $ 26,318 Corporate equity securities 1,973 1,973 $ 28,291 $ — $ — $ 28,291 Investment instruments valued using Level 1 inputs include the Company’s money market securities and certain of the corporate equity securities which were obtained by the Company as part of the Luna litigation settlement for which there is now not a significant non-marketability issue. The Company periodically assesses whether significant facts and circumstances have arisen to indicate that an impairment, which is other than temporary, of the fair value of any underlying investment has occurred. There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2, or into or out of Level 3, during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015. The changes in Level 3 liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis was as follow (in thousands): Level 3 Input for Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 (In thousands) Balance at December 31, 2014 $ — Additions at March 11, 2015 (14,776 ) Change in fair value of warrant liability (2,993 ) Reclass to additional paid-in capital 17,769 Balance at June 30, 2015 $ — Warrant liability In connection with the issuance of Series A convertible preferred stock on March 11, 2015, the Company also issued Series E Warrants to the participating investors to purchase an aggregate of 53,846,000 shares of common stock with an exercise period of two years from the date of issuance. On the date of issuance, the exercise price for the Series E Warrants was the lesser of $0.975 per share or a 50% premium on the per share trailing volume weighted average share price of the common stock on NASDAQ for the ten trading days ending on dates specified in the form of Series E Warrants filed with the SEC. The Series E Warrants were not exercisable until receipt of stockholder approval to among other things increase the number of authorized shares of common stock of the Company. The proposal relating to such approval was presented and received the stockholder approval at the 2015 Annual Meeting of the Company held on May 12, 2015 (the “Requisite Stockholder Approval”). As a result of the contingency which was deemed outside the Company’s control, such Series E Warrants did not originally meet the criteria for classification as equity under ASC 815. As such, the Company classified the Series E Warrants as current liabilities at fair value upon issuance of $14.8 million. The Company used a third party valuation that utilized the Monte Carlo simulation model to estimate the fair value of the Series A convertible preferred stock and Series E Warrants. The valuation used a simulation of the Company’s periodic stock price, expected volatility of the price, adjusted for conversion price, and the remaining contractual term of the warrants. The Series E Warrants were subject to re-measurement at each balance sheet date, with any change in fair value recognized as warrant expense, a component of other income (expense) reflected within the statement of operations. The Company recorded the change in fair value of $1.3 million and $3.0 million in other income (expense) on the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively. Upon receipt of Requisite Stockholder Approval, all criteria for the Series E Warrants to be classified as equity were met. Using the BSM model with an exercise price of $0.975 per share for the Series E Warrants, the Company reclassified the warrant liability of $17.8 million, representing the fair value of the Company’s warrant liability as of the Requisite Stockholder Approval date, to additional paid-in capital. See Note 9 for further information regarding the Company’s 2015 private placement of Series A convertible preferred stock and Series E Warrants. All of the Series E Warrants are currently issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2015. Long-term Debt The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt was estimated to be $34.5 million as of June 30, 2015 and $34.2 million as of December 31, 2014 based on an internal valuation model that utilized the then-current rates available to the Company for debt of a similar term and remaining maturity, which constitutes Level 2 inputs under the fair value hierarchy. Considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the fair value estimate presented herein is not necessarily indicative of the amount that the Company or holders of the instruments could realize in a current market exchange. The use of different assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value. See Note 8 for further information regarding the Company’s long-term debt. |