- BGS Dashboard
- Financials
- Filings
-
Holdings
- Transcripts
- ETFs
- Insider
- Institutional
- Shorts
-
DEF 14A Filing
B&G Foods (BGS) DEF 14ADefinitive proxy
Filed: 30 Mar 12, 12:00am
Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2012.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrantý | ||
Filed by a Party other than the Registranto | ||
Check the appropriate box: | ||
o | Preliminary Proxy Statement | |
o | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | |
ý | Definitive Proxy Statement | |
o | Definitive Additional Materials | |
o | Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 |
B&G FOODS, INC. | ||||
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) | ||||
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) | ||||
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): | ||||
ý | No fee required. | |||
o | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. | |||
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: | |||
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: | |||
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): | |||
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: | |||
(5) | Total fee paid: | |||
o | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. | |||
o | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. | |||
(1) | Amount Previously Paid: | |||
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: | |||
(3) | Filing Party: | |||
(4) | Date Filed: |
Four Gatehall Drive
Parsippany, NJ 07054
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD MAY 15, 2012
To the Stockholders of B&G Foods, Inc.:
An annual meeting of stockholders of B&G Foods, Inc. will be held on Tuesday, May 15, 2012, at 10:00 a.m., local time, at the Sheraton Parsippany Hotel, 199 Smith Road, Parsippany, NJ 07054, for the following purposes (which are more fully described in the accompanying proxy statement):
The board of directors has fixed the close of business on March 23, 2012, as the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual meeting and any adjournment or postponement of the meeting.
Once again, we are pleased to take advantage of the Securities and Exchange Commission rule that allows companies to furnish proxy materials to their stockholders on the Internet. As a result, we are mailing to most of our stockholders a notice of Internet availability of proxy materials instead of paper copies of this proxy statement and our 2011 Annual Report. We believe that this process allows us to provide our stockholders with the information they need in a timelier manner, while reducing the environmental impact and lowering the costs of printing and distributing our proxy materials. All stockholders who have previously requested paper copies of our proxy materials will continue to receive paper copies by mail.
Your vote is important, and you are cordially invited to attend the annual meeting. Whether or not you expect to attend the annual meeting, we encourage you to vote as soon as possible. You may vote by proxy over the Internet or by telephone, or, if you received paper copies of the proxy materials by mail, you can also vote by mail by following the instructions on the proxy card or voting instruction card. Voting over the Internet, by telephone or by written proxy or voting instruction card will ensure your representation at the annual meeting regardless of whether you attend in person.
By Order of the Board of Directors, | ||
![]() | ||
Scott E. Lerner Secretary |
Parsippany, New Jersey
March 30, 2012
| Page | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
GENERAL INFORMATION | 1 | |||
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE | 5 | |||
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics; Corporate Governance Guidelines; Board Committee Charters | 5 | |||
Role of the Board of Directors | 5 | |||
Board Leadership Structure | 5 | |||
Meetings of the Board of Directors | 6 | |||
Communication with the Board of Directors; Director Attendance at Annual Meetings | 6 | |||
Director Independence | 6 | |||
Committees of the Board of Directors | 7 | |||
The Board's Role in Risk Oversight | 8 | |||
Director Nominations | 9 | |||
Director Compensation | 10 | |||
PROPOSAL NO. 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS | 13 | |||
Introduction | 13 | |||
Director Nominees | 13 | |||
Required Vote | 16 | |||
Recommendation of the Board of Directors | 16 | |||
OUR MANAGEMENT | 17 | |||
Executive Officers and Directors | 17 | |||
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | 19 | |||
Introduction | 19 | |||
Executive Summary | 19 | |||
Results of 2011's "Say on Pay" Vote | 20 | |||
Role of the Compensation Committee | 20 | |||
Role of our Chief Executive Officer in Compensation Decisions | 21 | |||
Peer Group Surveys | 21 | |||
Components of Executive Compensation | 21 | |||
Chief Executive Officer Compensation | 27 | |||
Accounting and Tax Considerations | 27 | |||
Executive Compensation Clawback Policy | 27 | |||
Stock Ownership Guidelines | 27 | |||
Anti-Hedging Policy | 28 | |||
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation | 28 | |||
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE | 29 | |||
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | 30 | |||
Summary Compensation Table | 30 | |||
Grants of Plan Based Awards in Fiscal 2011 | 32 | |||
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2011 Fiscal Year-End | 33 | |||
Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal 2011 | 34 | |||
Management Employment Agreements | 34 | |||
401(k) Plan | 37 | |||
Pension Plan | 37 | |||
PROPOSAL NO. 2—ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | 39 | |||
Introduction | 39 | |||
Required Vote | 39 | |||
Recommendation of the Board of Directors | 39 | |||
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT | 40 |
i
| Page | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE | 41 | |||
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS | 41 | |||
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE | 42 | |||
PROPOSAL NO. 3—APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM | 43 | |||
Introduction | 43 | |||
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees | 43 | |||
Required Vote | 44 | |||
Recommendation of the Board of Directors | 44 | |||
OTHER MATTERS | 45 | |||
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION | 45 |
ii
Four Gatehall Drive
Parsippany, NJ 07054
PROXY STATEMENT
FOR AN ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD MAY 15, 2012
Why am I receiving these materials?
This proxy statement is provided to the stockholders of B&G Foods, Inc. ("B&G Foods," "we," or "our company") in connection with the solicitation of proxies by our board of directors to be voted at an annual meeting of stockholders to be held at the Sheraton Parsippany Hotel, 199 Smith Road, Parsippany, NJ 07054, at 10:00 a.m., local time, on Tuesday, May 15, 2012, and at any adjournment or postponement of the meeting. This proxy statement and the related materials are first being distributed or made available to stockholders on or about March 30, 2012. This proxy statement provides information that should be helpful to you in deciding how to vote on the matters to be voted on at the annual meeting.
What items will be voted on at the annual meeting?
At the annual meeting, the stockholders will consider and vote upon
What are included in the proxy materials?
The proxy materials include:
If you received a paper copy of these materials by mail, the proxy materials also include a proxy card or a voting instruction card for the annual meeting.
What is a proxy statement? What information is contained in this proxy statement?
It is a document that Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regulations require us to give you when we ask you to sign a proxy card designating proxies to vote on your behalf. The information in this proxy statement relates to the proposals to be voted on at the annual meeting, the voting process, B&G Foods' board of directors and board committees, the compensation of our directors and executive officers for fiscal 2011 and other required information.
It is your legal designation of another person to vote the stock you own. That other person is called a proxy. If you designate someone as your proxy in a written document, that document also is called a proxy or a proxy card. We have designated two of our officers as proxies for the annual meeting. These two officers are Robert C. Cantwell and Scott E. Lerner.
Why did I receive a notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of the proxy materials instead of a paper copy of the proxy materials?
Once again, we are pleased to be using the SEC rule that allows companies to furnish their proxy materials to stockholders over the Internet. As a result, we are mailing to most of our stockholders a notice about the Internet availability of the proxy materials instead of a paper copy of the proxy materials. All stockholders receiving the notice will have the ability to access the proxy materials over the Internet and request to receive a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet or to request a paper copy may be found in the notice.
Why didn't I receive a notice in the mail about the Internet availability of the proxy materials?
We are providing stockholders who have previously requested to receive paper copies of the proxy materials with paper copies instead of a notice about the Internet availability of the proxy materials.
In addition, we are providing notice of the availability of the proxy materials by e-mail to those stockholders who have previously elected delivery of the proxy materials electronically. Those stockholders should have received an e-mail containing a link to the website where those materials are available and a link to the proxy voting website.
How can I access the proxy materials over the Internet?
The notice of annual meeting, proxy statement and annual report are available at http://materials.proxyvote.com/05508R. Instead of receiving future copies of the proxy materials by mail, most beneficial owners can elect to receive an e-mail that will provide electronic links to these documents. Opting to receive your proxy materials online will save us the cost of producing and mailing documents to your home or business, and also will give you an electronic link to the proxy voting site. If you received a notice of the Internet availability of proxy materials that notice will contain additional instructions on how to view our proxy materials on the Internet.
How may I obtain a paper copy of the proxy materials?
Stockholders receiving a notice about the Internet availability of the proxy materials will find instructions about how to obtain a paper copy of the proxy materials on that notice. Stockholders receiving notice of the availability of the proxy materials by e-mail will find instructions about how to obtain a paper copy of the proxy materials as part of that e-mail. All stockholders who do not receive a notice or an e-mail will receive a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail.
What is the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of record and as a beneficial owner?
If your shares are registered directly in your name with B&G Foods' registrar and transfer agent, Computershare (successor to BNY Mellon Shareowner Services), you are considered a stockholder of record with respect to those shares.
If your shares are held in a brokerage account or bank, you are considered the "beneficial owner" of those shares.
2
Who is entitled to vote at the annual meeting?
Each holder of record of our common stock at the close of business on March 23, 2012 is entitled to vote at the annual meeting. As of that date, a total of 48,369,789 shares of common stock were outstanding and are eligible to vote at the annual meeting. Each share of our common stock is entitled to one vote per share on all matters with respect to which holders are entitled to vote.
Your shares may only be voted at the annual meeting if you are present in person or are represented by proxy. Whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting, we encourage you to vote by proxy to assure that your shares will be represented. Voting by proxy will in no way limit your right to vote at the annual meeting if you later decide to attend in person. Beneficial owners, however, may vote in person at the annual meeting only if they have a legal proxy, as described below.
Stockholders of Record. If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote by proxy by completing the enclosed proxy card and mailing it in the postage-paid envelope provided. In the alternative, stockholders of record may vote in person at the annual meeting.
Beneficial Owners. If your shares are held in the name of a broker, bank or other nominee, that institution will instruct you as to how your shares may be voted by proxy, including whether telephone or Internet voting options are available. If your shares are held in the name of a broker, bank or other nominee, and you would like to vote in person at the meeting, you must first obtain a proxy, executed in your favor, from the institution that holds your shares.
What can I do if I change my mind after I vote my shares?
Stockholders of Record. If you are a stockholder of record, you may revoke your proxy at any time before it is exercised by timely submission of a written revocation to our corporate secretary, submission of a properly executed later-dated proxy, or by voting by ballot at the annual meeting. Attendance at the annual meeting will not by itself constitute a revocation of a proxy.
Beneficial Owners. If your shares are held in the name of a broker, bank or other holder of record, that institution will instruct you as to how your vote may be changed.
If I am a stockholder of record, how will my shares be voted if I sign, date and return my proxy card? What if I do not specify a choice for a matter when returning my signed proxy card?
All shares entitled to vote that are represented by properly completed proxy cards received prior to the annual meeting and not revoked will be voted at the meeting in accordance with your instructions. If you sign and return a proxy card but do not indicate how your shares should be voted, the shares represented by your properly completed proxy card will be voted:
What if I am a beneficial owner and do not give voting instructions to my broker?
As a beneficial owner, in order to ensure your shares are voted in the way you would like, you must provide voting instructions to your bank, broker or other nominee by the deadline provided in the
3
materials you receive from your bank, broker or other nominee. If you do not provide voting instructions to your bank, broker or other nominee, whether your shares can be voted by such bank, broker or nominee depends on the type of item being considered for vote.
Non-Discretionary Items. The election of directors and advisory say on pay vote are non-discretionary items and may not be voted on by brokers, banks or other nominees who have not received specific voting instructions from beneficial owners.
Discretionary Items. The ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as independent registered public accounting firm is a discretionary item. Generally, brokers, banks and other nominees that do not receive voting instructions from beneficial owners may vote on this proposal in their discretion.
Who may attend the annual meeting?
All stockholders that were our stockholders as of the record date (March 23, 2012), or their authorized representatives, may attend the annual meeting. Admission to the meeting will be on a first-come, first-served basis. If your shares are held in the name of a broker, bank or other nominee and you plan to attend the annual meeting, you should bring proof of ownership, such as a brokerage or bank account statement, to the annual meeting to ensure your admission.
The presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of our company entitled to vote on a particular matter will constitute a quorum for the purpose of considering that matter. Abstentions and broker "non-votes" will be counted as present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining a quorum. A broker "non-vote" occurs when a nominee, such as a bank or broker, holding shares for a beneficial owner, does not vote on a particular proposal because the nominee does not have discretionary voting power with respect to that item and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner.
With respect to the nominees for director under Proposal No. 1—Election of Directors, to be elected, each nominee must receive a plurality of all votes cast with respect to such position as director. Consequently, the eight director nominees receiving the most votes of holders of our common stock will be elected directors. Proposal Nos. 2 and 3 each require the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of the shares of common stock voting in person or by proxy at the annual meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be included in the vote totals and will not affect the outcome of the vote for Proposal Nos. 1 through 3.
A representative of our transfer agent, Computershare, will tally the vote, and will serve as inspector of the annual meeting.
How are proxies being solicited and who will pay for the solicitation of proxies?
We will bear the expense of the solicitation of proxies. In addition to the solicitation of proxies by mail, solicitation may be made by our directors, officers and employees by other means, including telephone, over the Internet or in person. No special compensation will be paid to our directors, officers or employees for the solicitation of proxies. To solicit proxies, we will also request the assistance of brokerage houses, banks and other custodians, nominees or fiduciaries, and, upon request, will reimburse such organizations or individuals for their reasonable expenses in forwarding soliciting materials to beneficial owners and in obtaining authorization for the execution of proxies.
4
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 15, 2012
The Notice of Annual Meeting, Proxy Statement and 2011 Annual Report are available at http://materials.proxyvote.com/05508R.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics; Corporate Governance Guidelines; Board Committee Charters
B&G Foods is committed to conducting every aspect of our business in an ethical, open and honest manner and in full compliance with the law, both in letter and in spirit. Our code of business conduct and ethics applies to all of our employees, officers and directors, including our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, and lays out guidelines for our employees, officers and directors to follow as they conduct business on behalf of our company. B&G Foods has also adopted corporate governance guidelines, which, together with our certificate of incorporation, bylaws and board committee charters, form the framework for the corporate governance of B&G Foods.
The full text of the code of business conduct and ethics as well as our corporate governance guidelines, audit committee charter, compensation committee charter and nominating and governance committee charter are available at the investor relations section of our web site, http://ir.bgfoods.com. We intend to disclose any amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of the code of business conduct and ethics that applies to our chief executive officer or chief financial officer in the investor relations section of our web site. Stockholders may request free printed copies of the code of business conduct and ethics, corporate governance guidelines and the board committee charters by writing to: B&G Foods, Inc., Attention: Corporate Secretary, Four Gatehall Drive, Parsippany, NJ 07054 or corporatesecretary@bgfoods.com.
Role of the Board of Directors
In accordance with the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware and our certificate of incorporation and our bylaws, our business, property and affairs are managed under the direction of the board of directors. Although our directors are not involved in our day-to-day operating details, they are kept informed of our business through written reports and documents provided to them regularly, as well as by operating, financial and other reports presented by our officers at meetings of the board of directors and committees of the board of directors.
Currently, we separate the roles of chairman of the board of directors and chief executive officer. Separating these roles allows our chief executive officer to focus on the day-to-day management of our business and our chairman, an independent director, to lead the board and focus on providing advice and independent oversight of management. Given the time and effort that is required of each of these positions and our preference to have an independent director lead our board, we currently believe it is best to separate these roles. However, neither our bylaws nor our corporate governance guidelines requires that we separate these roles and the board does not have a policy on whether the same person should serve as both the chief executive officer and chairman of the board or, if the roles are separate, whether the chairman should be selected from the non-management directors. Our board believes that it should have the flexibility to make these determinations from time to time in the way that it believes best to provide appropriate leadership for our company under then existing circumstances.
5
Meetings of the Board of Directors
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 (fiscal 2011), the board of directors held five meetings. Each of the directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate of all meetings held by the board of directors and each committee of the board of directors on which he or she served during fiscal 2011, in each case held during the period for which he or she was a director and committee member. Our non-management directors meet regularly (at least quarterly) in executive session of the board without management directors or employees present. The chairman of the board of directors (or, in the chairman's absence or if the chairman is not an independent director, another independent director designated by the non-management directors) presides over executive sessions of the non-management directors.
Communication with the Board of Directors; Director Attendance at Annual Meetings
Stockholders, employees and all other interested parties may communicate with a member or members or committee of the board of directors by addressing their correspondence to the board member or members or committee c/o Corporate Secretary, B&G Foods, Inc., Four Gatehall Drive, Parsippany, NJ 07054 or by e-mail to corporatesecretary@bgfoods.com. Our corporate secretary will review the correspondence and will determine, in his good faith judgment, which stockholder communications will be relayed to the board of directors, any committee or any director. Our corporate secretary has the authority to discard or disregard any inappropriate communications or to take other appropriate actions with respect to any such inappropriate communications. Subject to the foregoing, mail addressed to "board of directors" or "non-management directors" will be forwarded to the chairman of the board.
Recognizing that director attendance at our annual meetings can provide our stockholders with a valuable opportunity to communicate with board members about issues affecting our company, we encourage our directors to attend each annual meeting of stockholders. All directors attended the 2011 annual meeting and we anticipate that all directors will attend the 2012 annual meeting.
In making independence determinations, the board of directors observes all criteria for independence established by the SEC, the New York Stock Exchange and other governing laws and regulations. The board considers all relevant facts and circumstances in making an independence determination. In accordance with our corporate governance guidelines, to be considered independent:
The board of directors, through its nominating and governance committee, annually reviews all relevant business relationships any director may have with our company. As a result of its annual review, the board has determined that each of the following directors meets the independence tests under the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange, none of the following directors has a material relationship with the company and, as a result, such directors are independent: Stephen C. Sherrill, Cynthia T. Jamison, Charles F. Marcy, Dennis M. Mullen, Cheryl M. Palmer and Alfred Poe.
6
Committees of the Board of Directors
The board of directors has an audit committee, compensation committee and a nominating and governance committee. The following table describes the current members of each committee and the number of meetings held during fiscal 2011:
| Audit | Compensation | Nominating and Governance | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Meetings: | 5 | 12 | 2 | |||
Name: | ||||||
Cynthia T. Jamison | Chairman | þ | ||||
Charles F. Marcy | þ | þ | ||||
Dennis M. Mullen | þ | Chairman | ||||
Cheryl M. Palmer | þ | |||||
Alfred Poe | þ | Chairman |
Audit Committee
The principal duties and responsibilities of our audit committee are as follows:
The audit committee has the power to investigate any matter brought to its attention within the scope of its duties. It also has the authority to retain counsel and advisors to fulfill its responsibilities and duties. Each director who serves on the audit committee is independent under the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange and as that term is used in Section 10A(m)(3) of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended. The board of directors has determined that Ms. Jamison qualifies as an audit committee financial expert as that term is defined by applicable SEC regulations, and has designated Ms. Jamison as the audit committee's financial expert.
The audit committee operates under a written charter adopted by the board of directors. A copy of the charter is available at the investor relations section of our website, http://ir.bgfoods.com. The report of the audit committee begins on page 42 of this proxy statement.
Compensation Committee
The principal duties and responsibilities of the compensation committee are as follows:
7
Each director who serves on the compensation committee is independent under the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, with respect to compensation committees. The compensation committee operates under a written charter adopted by the board of directors, a copy of which is available at the investor relations section of our website, http://ir.bgfoods.com. The report of the compensation committee is set forth on page 29 of this proxy statement.
Nominating and Governance Committee
The principal duties and responsibilities of the nominating and governance committee are as follows:
Each director who serves on the nominating and governance committee is independent under the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange with respect to nominating and governance committees. The nominating and governance committee operates under a written charter adopted by the board of directors, a copy of which is available at the investor relations section of our website, http://ir.bgfoods.com.
The Board's Role in Risk Oversight
Management is responsible for the day-to-day risks our company faces. Our board of directors is responsible to:
Beyond these fundamental responsibilities for risk oversight, our board concentrates on the broader implications of our strategic plans and allows the committees to focus on specific areas of risk. Our directors, through their risk oversight role, attempt to satisfy themselves that the risk management processes designed and implemented by the company's executive officers and other senior managers are consistent with the company's corporate strategy and are functioning as directed.
The board believes that full and open communication between management and the board of directors is essential for effective risk management and oversight. Our executive officers attend our quarterly board meetings. In addition to making quarterly presentations at such meetings regarding our operations, our executive officers are available to discuss any questions or concerns raised by the board relating to risk management and any other matters.
8
While the board is ultimately responsible for risk oversight at our company, our three board committees assist the board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities in certain areas of risk.
Audit Committee. In accordance with its charter, the audit committee is required to, among other things, focus on the reasonableness of control processes for identifying and managing key business, financial and regulatory reporting risks. The audit committee is also mandated by its charter to discuss with management our company's major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures, including, as required by the NYSE, our risk assessment and risk management policies. The audit committee monitors our company's credit risk, liquidity risk, regulatory risk, operational risk and enterprise risk by regular reviews with management, external auditors and the firm that is responsible for our company's internal audit function.
Compensation Committee. The compensation committee assists the board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the evaluation and management of risks arising from our compensation policies and programs. As a result of its evaluation, the compensation committee has concluded that the risks arising from our compensation policies and practices are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our company.
Nominating and Governance Committee. The nominating and governance committee assists the board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the management of risks associated with corporate governance, including board structure, size, membership and succession planning for our directors and executive officers.
The nominating and governance committee will consider recommendations for directorships submitted by our stockholders. Stockholders who wish the nominating and governance committee to consider their recommendations for nominees for the position of director should submit their recommendations, in accordance with the procedures set forth in our bylaws, in writing to: Corporate Secretary, B&G Foods, Inc., Four Gatehall Drive, Parsippany, NJ 07054. In order to be considered for inclusion in the proxy statement and form of proxy for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2013, the stockholder's notice must be received by our company not less than 120 days nor more than 150 days before the first anniversary of the date of this proxy statement.
For nominations, such stockholder's notice shall set forth: (1) as to each person whom the stockholder proposes to nominate for election as a director, (A) the name, age, business address and residential address of such person, (B) the principal occupation or employment of such person, (C) a statement of the particular experience, qualifications, attributes or skills of the proposed nominee, (D) the number of shares of stock of our company that are beneficially owned by such person, (E) any other information relating to such person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of directors or is otherwise required by the rules and regulations of the SEC promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and (F) the written consent of the nominee to be named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected and (2) as to the stockholder giving the notice, (A) the name, and business address and residential address, as they appear on our stock transfer books, of the nominating stockholder, (B) a representation that the nominating stockholder is a stockholder of record and intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to nominate the person or persons specified in the notice, (C) the class and number of shares of stock of our company beneficially owned by the nominating stockholder and (D) a description of all arrangements or understandings between the nominating stockholder and each nominee and any other person or persons (naming such person or persons) pursuant to which the nomination or nominations are to be made by the nominating stockholder.
9
In its assessment of each potential candidate, the nominating and governance committee will review the nominee's professional ethics, integrity and values, judgment, experience, independence, commitment to representing the long-term interests of the stockholders, understanding of our company's industry or other related industries and such other factors the nominating and governance committee determines are pertinent in light of the current needs of the board of directors. The nominating and governance committee seeks to identify candidates representing diverse experience at policy-making levels in business, management, marketing, finance, human resources, communications and other areas that are relevant to our activities. The nominating and governance committee will also take into account the ability of a director to devote the time and effort necessary to fulfill his or her responsibilities to our company. After full consideration, the stockholder proponent will be notified of the decision of the nominating and governance committee.
Nominees may also be recommended by directors, members of management, or, in some cases, by a third party firm. In identifying and considering candidates for nomination to the board, the nominating and governance committee considers, in addition to the requirements described above and set out in its charter, quality of experience, our needs and the range of knowledge, experience and diversity represented on the board. Each director candidate will be evaluated by the nominating and governance committee based on the same criteria and in the same manner, regardless of whether the candidate was recommended by a company stockholder or by others.
The nominating and governance committee will conduct the appropriate and necessary inquiries with respect to the backgrounds and qualifications of all director nominees. The nominating and governance committee will also review the independence of each candidate and other qualifications of all director candidates, as well as consider questions of possible conflicts of interest between director nominees and our company. After the nominating and governance committee has completed its review of a nominee's qualifications and conducted the appropriate inquiries, the nominating and governance committee will make a determination whether to recommend the nominee for approval by the board of directors. If the nominating and governance committee decides to recommend the director nominee for nomination by the board of directors and such recommendation is accepted by the board, the form of our proxy solicitation will include the name of the director nominee.
Employee directors do not receive any separate compensation for their board activities. Each of our non-employee directors receives an annual fee payable in cash. In addition, to ensure that our non-employee directors have an ownership interest aligned with our stockholders, each non-employee director also receives an annual grant of shares of our common stock issued under our 2008 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan (which we refer to in this proxy statement as the 2008 Omnibus Plan). Members of our board committees receive an additional annual fee for each committee on which they serve. Each non-employee director also receives a cash fee for each board meeting and committee meeting attended in person or by telephone. Our directors are entitled to reimbursement of their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in connection with their travel to and attendance at meetings of the board of directors or board committees.
10
During the first quarter of 2012, the compensation committee recommended, and the full board approved, an increase in the annual equity grant to non-employee directors from $55,000 to $70,000 after reviewing director compensation surveys. All other components of non-employee director compensation remain unchanged for 2012. A summary of our director compensation program is summarized in the table below:
Compensation Element | 2012 Compensation (June 2012 - May 2013) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
General Board Service—Cash | |||||||||
Annual Fee—Chair | $60,000 | ||||||||
Annual Fee—Other Members | $45,000 | ||||||||
Meeting Fee (in person) | $2,000 | ||||||||
Meeting Fee (by telephone) | $1,000 | ||||||||
General Board Service—Equity | |||||||||
Grant date fair value of shares of common stock granted annually | $70,000 | ||||||||
Number of shares | Determined based on the closing stock price on the last business day of the calendar month of the annual meeting of stockholders. Shares issued on the first business day of the next month. | ||||||||
Vesting schedule | Immediate upon grant | ||||||||
Committee Service—Cash |
| Audit Committee | Compensation Committee | Nominating & Governance Committee | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Annual Fee—Chair | $ | 17,500 | $ | 10,000 | $ | 10,000 | ||||
Annual Fee—Other Members | $ | 7,500 | $ | 7,500 | $ | 7,500 | ||||
Meeting Fee (in person) | $ | 1,000 | $ | 1,000 | $ | 1,000 | ||||
Meeting Fee (by telephone) | $ | 500 | $ | 500 | $ | 500 |
During fiscal 2011, our non-employee directors received the following compensation:
Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash | Stock Awards(1) | Option Awards | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation | Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings | All Other Compensation | Total | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stephen C. Sherrill | $ | 69,000 | $ | 54,990 | — | — | — | — | $ | 123,990 | ||||||||||||
Cynthia T. Jamison | $ | 88,500 | $ | 54,990 | — | — | — | — | $ | 143,490 | ||||||||||||
Charles F. Marcy | $ | 77,000 | $ | 54,990 | — | — | — | — | $ | 131,990 | ||||||||||||
Dennis M. Mullen | $ | 76,000 | $ | 54,990 | — | — | — | — | $ | 130,990 | ||||||||||||
Cheryl M. Palmer | $ | 62,500 | $ | 54,990 | — | — | — | — | $ | 117,490 | ||||||||||||
Alfred Poe | $ | 81,000 | $ | 54,990 | — | — | — | — | $ | 135,990 |
11
stock to the directors, the number of shares of common stock granted, the grant date and the fair value of the stock award computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718:
Name | Grant Date | Number of Shares of Common Stock | Grant Date Fair Value | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stephen C. Sherrill | 6/1/2011 | 2,966 | $ | 54,990 | ||||||
Cynthia T. Jamison | 6/1/2011 | 2,966 | $ | 54,990 | ||||||
Charles F. Marcy | 6/1/2011 | 2,966 | $ | 54,990 | ||||||
Dennis M. Mullen | 6/1/2011 | 2,966 | $ | 54,990 | ||||||
Cheryl M. Palmer | 6/1/2011 | 2,966 | $ | 54,990 | ||||||
Alfred Poe | 6/1/2011 | 2,966 | $ | 54,990 |
12
PROPOSAL NO. 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Our company's bylaws provide for the annual election of directors. Upon the recommendation of our nominating and governance committee, our board of directors has nominated for re-election each of our current directors.
At the annual meeting, the eight nominees for director are to be elected to hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors have been elected and qualified. Each of the nominees has consented to serve as a director if elected. If any of the nominees shall become unable or unwilling to stand for election as a director (an event not now anticipated by the board of directors), proxies will be voted for such substitute as designated by the board of directors.
The following sets forth certain biographical information about the nominees for election as directors, including a description of their business experience during at least the past five years and the specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that qualify them to serve as directors of B&G Foods and/or members of the board committees on which they serve. For further information, about how director nominees are selected, see "Corporate Governance—Director Nominations" above.
Stephen C. Sherrill, 58 Chairman of the Board of Directors: Stephen Sherrill has been a director since B&G Foods' formation in 1996 and has been Chairman since 2005. Mr. Sherrill is a founder and has been a Managing Director of Bruckmann, Rosser, Sherrill & Co., Inc. (BRS) since its formation in 1995. BRS was the controlling stockholder of B&G Foods from its formation in 1996 until its initial public offering in 2004. Mr. Sherrill was an officer of Citicorp Venture Capital from 1983 until 1994. Prior to that, he was an associate at the New York law firm of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison. Mr. Sherrill has previously served as a director of Ruth's Chris Steakhouse, Inc., Remington Arms Company, Inc. and Lazy Days' R.V. Center, Inc.
Mr. Sherrill has many years of experience as a private equity investor and has served on the boards of directors of many public and private companies. Mr. Sherrill's expertise regarding mergers and acquisitions and debt and equity financing allows him to provide invaluable guidance to our board of directors and executive management regarding these matters. This has been and continues to be very important to B&G Foods because we have implemented, and intend to continue to implement, our growth strategy in part through the acquisition of complementary brands.
David L. Wenner, 62 President, Chief Executive Officer and Director: David Wenner is our President and Chief Executive Officer, positions he has held since 1993, and has been a director since 1997. Mr. Wenner joined our company in 1989 as Assistant to the President and was directly responsible for Distribution and Bloch & Guggenheimer operations. In 1991, he was promoted to Vice President and assumed responsibility for all company manufacturing operations. Prior to joining our company, Mr. Wenner spent 13 years at Johnson & Johnson in supervision and management positions, responsible for manufacturing, maintenance and purchasing. Mr. Wenner is active in industry trade groups and has served as President of Pickle Packers International, and serves on the Chairman's Advisory Council of the Grocery Manufacturers Association.
Having served as our President and Chief Executive Officer for 19 years, Mr. Wenner brings to our board an extraordinary understanding of our company's business, history and organization. Mr. Wenner's training as an engineer at the U.S. Naval Academy and prior experience in senior leadership positions overseeing manufacturing, maintenance and purchasing operations at B&G Foods and Johnson & Johnson, together with his day-to-day leadership and intimate knowledge of our business and operations, provide the board with invaluable insight into the operations of our company. Mr. Wenner, having teamed with Mr. Cantwell to successfully acquire and integrate over 25 separate
13
brands into our company's operations since 1996, also provides our board strong insight and guidance regarding potential acquisitions and acquisition financing.
Robert C. Cantwell, 55, Executive Vice President of Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Director: Robert Cantwell is our Executive Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer, and has been a director since 2005. Mr. Cantwell joined our company in 1983 as the Assistant Vice President of Finance. In that position, Mr. Cantwell had responsibility for all financial reporting and budgeting. Mr. Cantwell was promoted to his current position in 1991, assuming full responsibility for all financial matters, as well as management information systems, data processing, administration and corporate human resources. Prior to joining us, Mr. Cantwell spent four years at Deloitte & Touche LLP, where he received accreditation as a Certified Public Accountant.
Like Mr. Wenner, Mr. Cantwell, who has been with B&G Foods for 29 years, brings to our board an extraordinary understanding of our company's business, history and organization. Mr. Cantwell also has extensive experience in accounting, finance, public company reporting, mergers and acquisitions, debt and equity financing, and operating successfully in a highly leveraged environment. Mr. Cantwell also has strong senior management and leadership experience.
Cynthia T. Jamison, 52, Director: Cynthia Jamison has been a director since 2004. Ms. Jamison currently serves as chief financial officer of AquaSpy, Inc. (an Australian environmentally responsible irrigation company), a position she has held since 2009. Ms. Jamison was previously a partner with Tatum, LLC from 1999 to 2010. From 2005 to 2009 she internally managed the CFO Services practice at Tatum and was a member of the Operating Committee of the firm. In her other Tatum roles she has served as the chief financial officer or chief operating officer or both of several publicly and privately held companies. Prior to joining Tatum, she served as Chief Financial Officer of Chart House Enterprises, a publicly traded restaurant company and previously held various financial positions at Allied Domecq Retailing USA, Kraft General Foods and Arthur Andersen. Ms. Jamison currently serves on the board of directors at Tractor Supply Company, Inc. (NASDAQ), where she is lead director and sits on the audit committee and the compensation committee and chairs the nominating and governance committee. As of December 2011, Ms. Jamison joined the newly formed board of directors of Caribe Media, Inc. (a private company based in the Dominican Republic), where she chairs the audit committee and sits on the compensation committee. Ms. Jamison previously served on the board of directors of Cellu Tissue Holdings, Inc. (NYSE), where she chaired the audit committee. She also previously held a board seat at Horizon Organic Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ), where she sat on the company's audit and compensation committees.
Ms. Jamison has extensive experience in financial and accounting matters, including public company reporting, as well as corporate governance and public company executive compensation experience, having served as chief financial officer or on the board of directors of many public and private companies. Ms. Jamison also brings key senior management, leadership and financial, strategic planning, corporate governance and public company executive compensation experience to our board of directors.
Charles F. Marcy, 61, Director: Charles "Chuck" F. Marcy has been a director since October 2010. Mr. Marcy is currently a principal with Marcy & Partners, Inc., and provides strategic planning and acquisition consulting to companies with a consumer focus. Mr. Marcy served as President and Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of Directors of Healthy Food Holdings (HFH), a holding company for branded "better-for-you" foods from 2005 through April 2010. Under Mr. Marcy's guidance, HFH's portfolio included Breyers Yogurt, YoCrunch Yogurt and Van's International Foods. Previously, Mr. Marcy served as President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Horizon Organic Holdings, then a publicly traded company listed on the NASDAQ with a leading market position in the organic food business in the United States and the United Kingdom, from 1999 to 2005. Mr. Marcy also previously served as President and Chief Executive officer of the Sealright Corporation, a
14
manufacturer of dairy packaging and packaging systems, from 1995 to 1998. From 1993 to 1995, Mr. Marcy was President of the Golden Grain Company, a subsidiary of Quaker Oats Company and maker of the Near East brand of all-natural grain-based food products. From 1991 to 1993, Mr. Marcy was President of National Dairy Products Corp., the dairy division of Kraft General Foods. From 1974 to 1991, Mr. Marcy held various senior marketing and strategic planning roles with Sara Lee Corporation and General Foods.
Mr. Marcy has many years of experience as a chief executive officer and senior executive officer in the food industry. Mr. Marcy brings key senior management, leadership, financial and strategic planning, corporate governance and public company executive compensation experience to our board of directors. Mr. Marcy also has a strong background in packaged foods marketing and has significant experience with organic foods.
Dennis M. Mullen, 58, Director: Dennis Mullen has been a director since 2006. Mr. Mullen has been a partner with The Mullen Group, LLC since its formation in 2011. The Mullen Group provides strategic advice regarding economic development and government and community relations. Prior to that, Mr. Mullen served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Empire State Development Corporation from June 2009 through February 2011, where he oversaw the statewide operations of New York State's primary economic development agency. During that time he also served as a Commissioner of New York State's Department of Economic Development. From September 2008 to June 2009, Mr. Mullen served as Upstate President of the Empire State Development Corporation, where he oversaw the upstate operations of the agency. From 2005 through August 2008, Mr. Mullen served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Greater Rochester Enterprise, an economic development company. Prior to that, Mr. Mullen was President and Chief Executive Officer of Birds Eye Foods, Inc., a leading manufacturer and marketer of frozen vegetables, and a major processor of other food products, from 1998 to 2005. Mr. Mullen also was a director of Birds Eye Foods from 1996 to 2005, serving as Chairman of the Board from 2002 to 2005. Prior to that, Mr. Mullen held various other leadership positions with Birds Eye Foods and related entities. Prior to employment with Birds Eye Foods, Mr. Mullen was President and Chief Executive Officer of Globe Products Company, Inc. Mr. Mullen currently serves on the board of directors of Foster Farms, a leading poultry producer in the Western United States. He formerly served on the board of directors of the Grocery Manufacturers Association.
Mr. Mullen has many years of experience as a chief executive officer and senior executive officer in the food industry. Mr. Mullen brings key senior management, leadership, financial and strategic planning, corporate governance and public company executive compensation experience to our board of directors.
Cheryl M. Palmer, 54, Director: Cheryl Palmer has been a director since October 2010. Ms. Palmer served as Corporate Vice President, Revenue & Product Development (Chief Revenue Officer) of Club Quarters, LLC, which operates full service hotels for member organizations in prime, downtown locations, from 2007 to 2011. Previously Ms. Palmer was Vice President, Northeast Zone, for The Gap, from 2005 to 2006. Prior to that Ms. Palmer served in executive leadership positions at The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company (A&P), including as President of the Food Emporium, a specialty food retail division, from 2000 to 2005, and as Senior Vice President, Strategic Marketing of A&P from 1999 to 2000. Prior to joining A&P, Ms. Palmer served as Group Vice President and General Manager Portfolio Leadership for Allied Domecq Spirits & Wines from 1997 to 1999. From 1985 to 1996, Ms. Palmer held various senior marketing and management positions at the Mott's North America and Schweppes USA divisions of Cadbury Beverages, Inc.
Ms. Palmer has many years of experience as a senior executive officer in the food industry. Ms. Palmer brings key senior management, leadership, financial and strategic planning, corporate governance and executive compensation experience to our board of directors. Ms. Palmer also has a
15
strong background in brand marketing. Ms. Palmer's retail food industry experience brings a fresh perspective to the board.
Alfred Poe, 63, Director: Alfred Poe has been a director since 1997. He is currently the Chief Executive Officer of AJA Restaurant Corp., serving as such since 1999. He was the Chief Executive Officer of Superior Nutrition Corporation, a provider of nutrition products, from 1997 to 2002. He was Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of MenuDirect Corporation, a provider of specialty meals for people on restricted diets, from 1997 to 1999. Mr. Poe was a Corporate Vice President of Campbell's Soup Company from 1991 through 1996. From 1993 through 1996, he was the President of Campbell's Meal Enhancement Group. From 1982 to 1991, Mr. Poe held various positions, including Vice President, Brands Director and Commercial Director with Mars, Inc. Mr. Poe previously served on the board of directors of Centerplate, Inc. (AMEX) and State Street Bank (NYSE).
Mr. Poe has many years of experience as a chief executive officer and senior executive officer in the packaged foods and food service industries. He has also served on the boards of directors of other public companies. In addition to bringing industry experience, Mr. Poe brings key senior management, leadership, financial and strategic planning, corporate governance and public company executive compensation experience to our board of directors.
To be elected, each nominee for director must receive a plurality of all votes cast with respect to such position as director. Shares not voted in the election of directors (including shares covered by a proxy as to which authority is withheld to vote for all nominees) and shares not voted for any particular nominee (including shares covered by a proxy as to which authority is withheld to vote for only one or less than all of the identified nominees) will not prevent the election of any of the nominees for director.
Recommendation of the Board of Directors
The board of directors recommends that the stockholders vote "FOR" each of the board of directors' nominees set forth in Proposal No. 1.
16
Executive Officers and Directors
Our executive officers and directors, their positions and their ages as of March 30, 2012, are as set forth in the table below. Each of our directors holds office until the next annual meeting of our stockholders or until his successor has been elected and qualified. Our executive officers serve at the discretion of the board of directors.
Name | Age | Position | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stephen C. Sherrill | 58 | Chairman of the Board of Directors | |||
David L. Wenner | 62 | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director | |||
Robert C. Cantwell | 55 | Executive Vice President of Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Director | |||
William F. Herbes | 57 | Executive Vice President of Operations | |||
Vanessa E. Maskal | 55 | Executive Vice President of Sales and Marketing | |||
William H. Wright | 67 | Executive Vice President of Quality Assurance and Research & Development | |||
Scott E. Lerner | 39 | Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Secretary and Chief Compliance Officer | |||
Cynthia T. Jamison | 52 | Director | |||
Charles F. Marcy | 61 | Director | |||
Dennis M. Mullen | 58 | Director | |||
Cheryl M. Palmer | 54 | Director | |||
Alfred Poe | 63 | Director |
For a description of the business experience of Messrs. Sherrill, Wenner, Cantwell, Marcy, Mullen and Poe and Mss. Jamison and Palmer, see "Proposal No. 1—Election of Directors."
William F. Herbes, Executive Vice President of Operations. Bill Herbes is Executive Vice President of Operations of B&G Foods, a position he has held since 2009. Mr. Herbes is responsible for our operations department, including all manufacturing, supply chain, purchasing and planning functions. Prior to joining B&G Foods, Mr. Herbes gained 24 years experience in operations and supply chain management at Warner Lambert and its successor companies, Pfizer and Cadbury Schweppes. Most recently, Mr. Herbes served as Senior Vice President, Global Supply Chain at Cadbury Schweppes and also worked with leading consumer packaged goods companies as an independent consultant.
Vanessa E. Maskal, Executive Vice President of Sales and Marketing. Vanessa Maskal is our Executive Vice President of Sales and Marketing. Ms. Maskal first joined B&G Foods in 1999 as Senior Brand Manager and after a brief hiatus returned to the company in 2003 as Director of Direct Store Delivery Sales. Ms. Maskal was promoted to Executive Vice President of Sales in November 2006. Ms. Maskal assumed responsibility for marketing in October 2008. Prior to joining B&G Foods, Ms. Maskal held senior positions at IBC Inc., Drake Bakeries and Whatman Inc.
17
William H. Wright, Executive Vice President of Quality Assurance and Research & Development. William Wright was promoted to Executive Vice President of Quality Assurance and Research & Development in February 2010. Mr. Wright joined B&G Foods in 1998 as Vice President of Quality Assurance and Research & Development and also assumed responsibility for Consumer Affairs. Prior to joining B&G Foods, Mr. Wright accumulated 30 years of supervision and management experience in maintenance, manufacturing and operations at Johnson & Johnson and as a plant manager at First Quality Products.
Scott E. Lerner, Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Secretary and Chief Compliance Officer. Scott Lerner is our Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Secretary and Chief Compliance Officer. Mr. Lerner joined our company in 2005 as Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. In 2006, Mr. Lerner was promoted to Executive Vice President and in 2009 he was given the added responsibility of being our Chief Compliance Officer, a then newly created position. From 1997 to 2005, Mr. Lerner was an associate in the corporate & securities and mergers & acquisitions practice groups at the international law firm Dechert LLP.
18
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The following Compensation Discussion and Analysis contains statements regarding historical and future company performance targets or goals. We have disclosed these targets or goals in the limited context of B&G Foods' compensation programs and they should not be understood to be statements of management's expectations or estimates of results or other guidance. We specifically caution investors not to apply these statements to other contexts.
In the paragraphs that follow, we will give an overview and analysis of our compensation program and policies, the material compensation decisions we have made under those programs and policies, and the material factors that we considered in making those decisions. Following this section you will find a series of tables containing specific information about the compensation earned or paid in fiscal 2011 to our chief executive officer, chief financial officer, and our next three most highly compensated executive officers. Throughout this proxy statement we refer to these individuals as our "named executive officers." The discussion below is intended to help you understand the detailed information provided in those tables and put that information into context within our overall compensation program.
The primary objective of our executive compensation program is to provide compensation designed to:
The compensation committee aims to provide incentives for superior performance in a given year and over a sustained period by paying fair, reasonable and competitive compensation, and by basing a significant portion of our target compensation package upon achieving that performance (i.e., "pay for performance").
We also aim for simplicity in our compensation program so that it is easy for our employees and our stockholders to understand the various components of our compensation program and the incentives designed to drive company performance. The three primary components of our executive compensation program are base salary, annual cash bonus and equity-based performance share long-term incentive awards.
We believe that the compensation program has been instrumental in helping the company achieve strong financial performance and shareholder value in 2011 as evidenced by the following:
19
Results of 2011's "Say on Pay" Vote
At B&G Foods' annual meeting of stockholders held on May 17, 2011, our stockholders approved, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in our 2011 proxy statement by greater than 94% of the votes cast. The current compensation program and policies do not deviate in any material way from those approved at last year's annual meeting of stockholders, except that as described below under "Components of Executive Compensation—Annual Bonus Plan" and "—Long-Term Incentive Compensation," our compensation committee has increased the level of difficulty for our named executive officers to achieve a "full" bonus and has reduced by one-third the maximum number of shares that may be earned under long-term incentive awards.
Role of the Compensation Committee
The compensation committee of our board of directors is responsible for setting and administering the policies that govern salary, annual bonus, long-term incentive programs and other compensation and benefits for our executive officers. The compensation committee oversees various executive and employee compensation plans and programs, and it has responsibility for continually monitoring these plans and programs to ensure that they adhere to our company's compensation philosophy and objectives. Our compensation committee determines the appropriate compensation levels of executives, evaluates officer and director compensation plans, policies and programs, and reviews benefit plans for officers and employees. Our compensation committee ensures that the total compensation paid to our named executive officers is fair, reasonable and competitive, and that a significant portion of the total compensation is tied to our company's annual and long-term performance.
The compensation committee's charter reflects the above-mentioned responsibilities, and the compensation committee and the board of directors periodically review and revise the charter. The compensation committee currently consists of three directors, each of whom was determined by our company's board of directors to be "independent" as defined by the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange. No member of the compensation committee is a current or former officer or employee of our company. Mr. Poe, the chairman of our compensation committee, reports on compensation committee actions and recommendations at each board meeting.
The compensation committee has the authority to engage the services of outside advisers, experts and others to assist the compensation committee, and believes that it is important to do so from time to time. See "Peer Group Surveys" below.
20
Role of our Chief Executive Officer in Compensation Decisions
Regarding most compensation matters, including executive compensation and our annual and long-term incentive plans, our chief executive officer provides recommendations to the compensation committee; however, the compensation committee does not delegate any of its functions to others in setting compensation for our named executive officers and directors.
The compensation committee makes all compensation decisions for the named executive officers. The compensation committee annually evaluates the performance of, and determines the compensation of, our chief executive officer based upon a combination of the achievement of corporate goals and individual performance. The compensation committee bases its evaluation in large part upon the annual evaluation of our chief executive officer performed by our nominating and governance committee, which is the committee that has primary responsibility for evaluating the performance of our chief executive officer. As part of its performance review process, the nominating and governance committee solicits the input of the full board of directors. Our chief executive officer annually reviews the performance of the other executive officers. The conclusions reached by our chief executive officer and recommendations based on these reviews, including with respect to salary adjustments and incentive plan award amounts for the other executive officers, are presented to the compensation committee. The compensation committee then exercises its discretion in modifying any recommended adjustments or awards. The chief executive officer does not participate in the decision making regarding his own compensation and is not present when his compensation is discussed. Our compensation committee reports the compensation decisions it has made with respect to our chief executive officer and each of the other named executive officers to the board of directors.
Our compensation committee does not use surveys of compensation paid to similar executives in order to determine annual and long-term compensation for our named executive officers. However, in light of the compensation objectives described above, the compensation committee does from time to time review peer group surveys as an independent measure to ensure that the compensation being set is fair, reasonable and competitive.
During fiscal 2011, the compensation committee engaged Meridian Compensation Partners, an independent executive compensation consulting firm, outside global human resources consulting firm, to prepare a peer group compensation survey based upon publicly available information prior to setting fiscal 2012 compensation for our executive officers. Meridian Compensation Partners did not perform any non-executive compensation consulting services for our company during the last fiscal year or during any other year.
The peer group included the companies listed below. The compensation committee did not review a peer group survey prior to setting fiscal 2011 compensation.
Diamond Foods, Inc. | McCormick & Co., Inc. | |
Farmer Brothers Co. | Ralcorp Holdings, Inc. | |
Flowers Foods, Inc. | John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. | |
Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. | Seneca Foods Corp. | |
Hain Celestial Group, Inc. | Smart Balance, Inc. | |
J&J Snack Foods Corp. | Snyder's-Lance, Inc. | |
Lancaster Colony Corp. | Treehouse Foods, Inc. |
Components of Executive Compensation
Consistent with itspay for performance philosophy, the compensation committee believes that it is important to place a greater percentage of executives' and senior managers' compensation at risk than
21
that of non-executives and non-senior managers by tying executives' and senior managers' compensation directly to the performance of B&G Foods. Accordingly, as set forth in the charts below a significant portion of executive compensation consists of annual bonuses and long-term incentives linked to the performance of the company.
Base Salaries
We have entered into employment agreements with all of our named executive officers. The current base salaries for our named executive officers are set forth below in the footnotes to the summary compensation table. For each of these executive officers, including our chief executive officer, the executive officer's base salary is subject to annual increase at the discretion of the compensation committee. Adjustments to base salary are based upon the executive officer's past performance, expected future contributions, and scope and nature of responsibilities, including changes in responsibilities. As discussed above, the compensation committee also from time to time reviews peer group surveys as an independent measure to ensure that any adjustments are fair, reasonable and competitive.
Performance-Based Awards
In order to align the interests of our stockholders with our compensation plans, we tie significant portions of our named executive officers' compensation to our annual and long-term financial and operating performance. Our performance-based awards are comprised of an annual incentive cash award and long-term incentive equity awards. The compensation committee's philosophy is that if our performance exceeds our internal targets and budgets, named executive officers can expect the level of their compensation to reflect that achievement. On the other hand, if our financial performance falls below these expectations, our approach is that named executive officers can expect their compensation to be adversely affected.
Our incentive award programs each use one of the two performance measures listed below:
The compensation committee has selected adjusted EBITDA as the relevant company goal because the compensation committee believes that adjusted EBITDA growth most closely reflects operating performance and is consistent with the overall goals and long-term strategic direction that the board of directors has set for our company. Further, adjusted EBITDA growth is closely related to or reflective of our company's financial and operational improvements, ability to generate cash flow from operations, growth and return to stockholders. We believe that adjusted EBITDA is helpful in assessing the overall performance of our business, and is helpful in highlighting trends in our overall business because the items excluded in calculating adjusted EBITDA have little or no bearing on our day-to-day operating performance. Adjusted EBITDA is an important non-GAAP valuation tool that potential investors use to measure our profitability against other companies in our industry.
22
withholding on behalf of employees for net share withholding. Excess cash as we define it for purposes of our incentive awards differs from the definition of the term in our financing agreements because, as used for purposes of our incentive awards, excess cash is reduced by the amount of dividends we pay but excludes the impact of certain debt repayments and in the case of the 2011 to 2013 performance share long-term incentive awards, payments to terminate an interest rate swap. We believe that excess cash is an important measure in analyzing our liquidity, including our ability to continue returning an above-average dividend to our stockholders, and our ability to execute on strategic opportunities and deliver stockholder value. Further, the compensation committee believes that excess cash performance targets encourage management to actively pursue acquisitions that are meaningfully accretive to our cash flows.
Beginning with the 2010 to 2012 performance share long-term incentive awards, the compensation committee re-defined "dividends paid" to effectively eliminate any positive or negative effect of any increases or decreases in the dividend rate from the dividend rate in effect at the time the excess cash performance goal is set. The compensation committee believes that the achievement of the excess cash performance goals should not be made harder for management to achieve in the event the board of directors decides to increase the current dividend rate and likewise should not be made easier for management to achieve in the event the board of directors decides to reduce the current dividend rate.
Adjusted EBITDA and excess cash targets for a given year are determined by the compensation committee based upon recommendations from and discussions with management, a review of current economic conditions and recent acquisition activity. Factors used by the compensation committee in setting adjusted EBITDA and excess cash targets include, among others, the following:
Neither adjusted EBITDA nor excess cash is a term defined under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
After the compensation committee reviews the final full year financial results of our company, the compensation committee approves performance based awards for completed performance periods. Performance based awards are generally paid in cash or stock, as applicable, in February or early March.
Annual Bonus Plan
The compensation committee believes that a portion of an executive officer's compensation should be tied to the achievement of the company's performance goals in the form of an annual non-equity incentive cash bonus, in order to reward performance and overall company success. B&G Foods' annual bonus plan provides for annual cash incentive awards to be made to our executive officers and senior managers upon our company's attainment of pre-set adjusted EBITDA objectives. However, no annual bonuses are paid unless excess cash for the fiscal year is positive. Adjusted EBITDA targets under the annual bonus plan may be reset periodically within a fiscal year by the compensation committee to take into account acquisitions and other unplanned events. Executives generally must be employed on the last day of a plan year to receive an annual bonus award, however, the compensation committee, at its discretion, may prorate awards in the event of certain circumstances such as the executive's promotion or demotion, death or retirement.
23
The amount of the annual award to each executive is based upon a percentage of the executive's or senior manager's annualized base salary, with such percentage varying depending upon the level of adjusted EBITDA as compared to threshold, target and maximum adjusted EBITDA performance objectives as set forth in the table below. Beginning with the 2012 annual bonus plan, the compensation committee has significantly increased the level of difficulty to achieve the threshold, target and maximum performance objectives. In recognition of the increased performance expectations, the committee also increased the target bonus award from 50% of a full bonus to 85% of a full bonus. The maximum bonus award as a percentage of salary has not been increased.
| 2011 Annual Bonus Award as a Percentage of Base Salary | 2012 Annual Bonus Award as a Percentage of Base Salary | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name | Threshold (No Bonus) | Target (Half Bonus) | Maximum (Full Bonus) | Threshold (No Bonus) | Target (85% Bonus) | Maximum (Full Bonus) | |||||||||||||
David L. Wenner | 0 | % | 50 | % | 100 | % | 0 | % | 85 | % | 100 | % | |||||||
Robert C. Cantwell | 0 | % | 35 | % | 70 | % | 0 | % | 60 | % | 70 | % | |||||||
Vanessa E. Maskal | 0 | % | 35 | % | 70 | % | 0 | % | 60 | % | 70 | % | |||||||
Scott E. Lerner | 0 | % | 35 | % | 70 | % | 0 | % | 60 | % | 70 | % | |||||||
William F. Herbes | 0 | % | 35 | % | 70 | % | 0 | % | 60 | % | 70 | % |
The fiscal 2011 adjusted EBITDA threshold, target and maximum performance objectives were $117.7 million, $119.7 million and $123.9 million. For sake of comparison, our fiscal 2010 adjusted EBTIDA was $119.7 million. Our company's fiscal 2011 adjusted EBITDA of $131.1 million was substantially above the maximum adjusted EBITDA objective of $123.9 million. Therefore, as reflected in the non-equity incentive plan compensation column in the summary compensation table below, the named executive officers received full bonus awards under the annual bonus plan for fiscal 2011.
Long-Term Incentive Compensation
Our long-term incentive compensation program is designed to promote a balanced focus on driving performance, retaining talent and aligning the interests of our executives with those of our other stockholders. The 2008 Omnibus Plan authorizes the grant of performance share awards, restricted stock, options, stock appreciation rights, deferred stock, stock units and cash-based awards to employees, non-employee directors and consultants. Subject to adjustment as provided in the plan, the total number of shares of common stock available for awards under the plan is 4,500,000. As of the date of this proxy statement, 1,253,139 shares of common stock have been issued under the plan and 3,237,467 shares remain available for issuance.
Performance Share Awards. Beginning in 2008, our compensation committee has made annual grants of performance share long-term incentive awards (LTIAs) to our named executive officers and certain other members of senior management. The LTIAs entitle the participants to earn shares of common stock upon the attainment of certain performance goals over the applicable performance period. The LTIAs currently have three-year cumulative performance periods.
The awards are settled in shares of common stock based upon our performance over the applicable performance period. The performance metric for the LTIAs is "excess cash" (as defined above). The LTIAs each have a threshold, target and maximum payout. If our performance meets or exceeds the performance threshold, then a varying amount of shares from the threshold amount (50% of the target number of shares) up to the maximum amount (300% of the target number of shares) may be earned. No shares are earned if the performance threshold is not met. Beginning with the 2012 to 2014 LTIAs granted in February 2012, the compensation committee has reduced the maximum number of shares that may be earned from 300% of the target number of shares to 200% of the target number of shares.
24
The compensation committee believes that the performance share LTIAs align the interests of our named executive officers with the interests of our stockholders because the number of shares earned is tied to the achievement of the company's long-term financial goals. In addition, the potential value of those shares if and when issued at the end of the performance period will depend on the price of our common stock at the end of the performance period.
The number of shares that may be earned by each executive officer and senior manager is based upon a percentage of his or her base salary. For each of our named executive officers, the grant date fair market value of the number of shares that may be earned upon satisfaction of the threshold, target and maximum performance objectives are equal to the following percentages of annualized base salary:
| 2011 to 2013 and Prior Performance Share LTIAs as a Percentage of Base Salary Based upon Grant Date Fair Market Value | 2012 to 2014 Performance Share LTIAs as a Percentage of Base Salary Based upon Grant Date Fair Market Value | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name | Threshold | Target | Maximum | Threshold | Target | Maximum | |||||||||||||
David L. Wenner | 50 | % | 100 | % | 300 | % | 50 | % | 100 | % | 200 | % | |||||||
Robert C. Cantwell | 37.5 | % | 75 | % | 225 | % | 37.5 | % | 75 | % | 150 | % | |||||||
Vanessa E. Maskal | 25 | % | 50 | % | 150 | % | 25 | % | 50 | % | 100 | % | |||||||
Scott E. Lerner | 25 | % | 50 | % | 150 | % | 25 | % | 50 | % | 100 | % | |||||||
William F. Herbes | 25 | % | 50 | % | 150 | % | 25 | % | 50 | % | 100 | % |
Because the number of shares that may be earned by each participant from threshold to maximum is determined at the beginning of the performance period based upon the price of our common stock at the date of grant of the performance share LTIA, the value of the award at the end of the performance period will depend not only upon the level at which the performance goals have been achieved but will also depend on the price of our common stock at the end of the performance period when the shares of common stock are actually issued to the participants.
For example, for any given three-year LTIA performance period, it is intended that our chief executive officer will receive an award at the end of the applicable three-year performance period with a value equal to 100% of his base salary at of the beginning of the performance periodif we meet our target excess cash objective for the three-year performance period. However, if over the three-year performance period we meet the performance objective at the target level but our stock price decreases by 50% over that three-year period, the value of the award decreases by 50% as compared to the grant date value. Likewise, if over that three-year performance period we meet the performance objective at the target level but our stock price increases by 50% over that three-year period, the value of the award increases by 50% as compared to the grant date value.
Performance Objectives for the Performance Period Ending in Fiscal 2011. Fiscal 2011 was the third and final year of the 2009 to 2011 LTIA performance period. As reflected in the table below actual cumulative excess cash (as defined above) for fiscal 2009 to 2011 exceeded the maximum performance objective. As a result, shares of common stock were earned at the maximum level and were issued to all eligible plan participants, including the named executive officers, in February 2012. A summary of the shares of common stock awarded to the named executive officers, the value realized on vesting of those awards, the number of shares withheld to cover withholding taxes and the net number of shares received can be found in the "Option Exercises and Stock Vested for Fiscal 2011" table on page 34.
| | Excess Cash Objective | | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | Actual Excess Cash | ||||||||||||||
| Performance Period | Threshold | Target | Maximum | ||||||||||||
2009 to 2011 LTIAs | Fiscal 2009 to 2011 | $ | 14,483,000 | $ | 28,966,000 | $ | 43,449,000 | $ | 98,715,111 |
25
Performance Objectives for Performance Periods Ending after Fiscal 2011. The compensation committee established the following objectives for LTIAs covering performance periods ending after fiscal 2011:
| | Cumulative Excess Cash Objective | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performance Period | Threshold | Target | Maximum | |||||||||
2010 to 2012 LTIAs | Fiscal 2010 to 2012 | $ | 51,710,500 | $ | 58,443,000 | $ | 80,943,000 | ||||||
2011 to 2013 LTIAs | Fiscal 2011 to 2013 | $ | 67,901,400 | $ | 75,446,000 | $ | 100,000,000 | ||||||
2012 to 2014 LTIAs | Fiscal 2012 to 2014 | $ | 116,672,400 | $ | 129,636,000 | $ | 168,526,800 |
Shares of common stock in respect of the 2010 to 2012 LTIAs, 2011 to 2013 LTIAs and 2012 to 2014 LTIAs will be issued in February 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively, in each case subject to the performance goals for the applicable performance period being certified by our compensation committee as having been achieved.
In general, participants must remain an employee of B&G Foods until the end of the applicable performance period in order to be entitled to any payment pursuant to LTIAs, except that in the case of separation from service due to termination without cause, retirement at age 62 or older, or death or disability, then after the performance period, the participant (or in the event of death, his or her estate) will be entitled to a pro rata portion of the number of performance shares, if any, the participant would have received had the participant remained employed until the end of the performance period. The pro rata portion will be based on the number of full months in the performance period during which the participant was employed as compared to the total number of months in the performance period. Also, in the case of a change of control (as defined in the 2008 Omnibus Plan) during a performance period, LTIAs will terminate. However, upon the change in control, participants will be entitled to receive a pro rata portion of the shares of common stock with respect to the target number of performance shares covered by the LTIAs without regard to the extent to which the performance conditions have been satisfied. The pro rata portion will be based upon the number of full months in the applicable performance period preceding the change in control as compared to the number of months in the performance period.
Other Compensation and Benefits
Benefits offered to executive officers serve a different purpose than do the other elements of total compensation. In general, they are designed to provide a safety net of protection against the financial catastrophes that can result from illness, disability or death, and to provide a reasonable level of retirement income based on years of service with our company. Benefits offered to executive officers are the same as those offered to the general employee population, except for the automobile allowance provided to the executive officers.
Executive officers are entitled to participate in the company's defined benefit pension plan. In addition, under the company's 401(k) plan, B&G Foods makes a 50% matching contribution with respect to each participant's elective contributions, up to six percent of such participant's compensation (provided that for fiscal 2011, matching contributions were based only on the first $245,000 of such participant's compensation). Matching contributions become fully vested after five years of employment with the company.
Executive Severance and Change in Control Severance Benefits
For a discussion of executive severance and change in control severance benefits, our rationale for offering those benefits and the triggers for payments, see "Management Employment Agreements—Severance Benefits" below.
26
Chief Executive Officer Compensation
The compensation committee remains responsible for reviewing and approving the corporate goals and objectives relevant to our chief executive officer's compensation and evaluating our chief executive officer's performance in light of those goals and objectives. Mr. Wenner has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer since March 1993. Mr. Wenner's compensation during fiscal 2011 was based upon his employment agreement and the other factors set forth above under "Components of Executive Compensation."
Accounting and Tax Considerations
Financial reporting and income tax consequences to our company of individual compensation elements are important considerations for our compensation committee when it is analyzing the overall level of compensation and the mix of compensation. Overall, the compensation committee seeks to balance its objective of ensuring a fair, reasonable and competitive compensation package for our named executive officers with the need to insure the deductibility of compensation—while ensuring an appropriate and transparent impact on reported earnings and other closely followed financial measures.
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended limits the deduction that may be claimed by a public company for compensation paid to certain executive officers to $1 million except to the extent that any excess compensation is "performance-based compensation," as defined by the Code. To the extent that it is practicable and consistent with our company's executive compensation philosophy, the compensation committee intends to design our executive compensation policy to maximize the deductibility of such compensation under Section 162(m). However, if compliance with Section 162(m) conflicts with the compensation philosophy, is determined not to be in the best interest of our stockholders or the amount of the loss of deductibility is deemed to be not material, the compensation committee will abide by its compensation philosophy even if it results in a loss of deductibility. Through fiscal 2011, Section 162(m) has not materially affected our tax deductions, and the compensation committee believes that, at the present time, it is unlikely that compensation paid to any of our executive officers in a taxable year that is subject to the deduction limit will exceed $1 million to an extent that would materially affect our tax deductions.
Executive Compensation Clawback Policy
B&G Foods does not currently have an executive compensation clawback policy. However, the compensation committee plans to adopt a clawback policy after the SEC issues final rules implementing the clawback provisions set forth in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The SEC has stated that it expects to issue preliminary rules during the first half of 2012 with final SEC rules to be adopted thereafter.
In February 2012, our board of directors adopted stock ownership guidelines for our non-employee directors to further align the interests of our non-employee directors with the interests of our stockholders. Each non-employee director is required to own our common stock in an amount equal to three times his or her annual cash retainer. Non-employee directors are required to achieve the relevant ownership threshold within five years after first becoming subject to the guidelines. If there is a significant decline in our stock price that causes a non-employee director's holdings to fall below the applicable threshold, the director will not be required to purchase additional shares to meet the threshold, but such director may not sell or transfer any shares until the threshold has again been achieved. Our nominating and governance committee plans to review these guidelines on an annual basis.
27
Although, our company does not currently have stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers, we encourage all of our executive officers to hold a significant amount of company stock and promote this goal through our long-term incentive awards. At this time, given the significant amount of company stock held by our executive officers and the nature of our long-term incentive awards, which increase or decrease in value during each performance period as our stock price increases or decreases, we believe that the interests of our executives are properly aligned with those of our other stockholders. If over time this situation changes, our board of directors will reevaluate the need for stock ownership guidelines. The table below illustrates the significant stock ownership of our named executive officers.
Name | Ratio of Stock Ownership to Base Salary(1) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
David L. Wenner | 24.7 | |||
Robert C. Cantwell | 14.4 | |||
Vanessa E. Maskal | 7.6 | |||
Scott E. Lerner | 5.3 | |||
William F. Herbes(2) | 1.5 |
To prevent speculation or hedging, our insider trading policy prohibits our named executive officers (and our directors and all other employees) from engaging in short sales of our company's stock. Company policy also prohibits our directors, executive officers and certain other employees from purchasing or selling any financial instrument that is designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of our company's stock, including prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars and other derivative securities that are directly linked to our company's stock. All other employees are discouraged from entering into hedging transactions related to company stock. In addition, our insider trading policy prohibits all directors, executive officers and all other employees from purchasing company securities on margin, holding company securities in a margin account or pledging company securities.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
No member of the compensation committee is now, or was during fiscal 2011 or at any time prior thereto, an officer or employee of our company or any of our subsidiaries. In addition, no member of the compensation committee had any relationship with the company that would require disclosure under the applicable rules of the SEC pertaining to the disclosure of transactions with related persons. None of the executive officers of our company currently serves or has served in the past on the board of directors or compensation committee of another company at any time during which an executive officer of such other company served on our board of directors or compensation committee.
28
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
The compensation committee of the board of directors of B&G Foods has reviewed and discussed the foregoing Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on this review and discussion, the committee recommended to our board of directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and incorporated by referenced into the company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2011. This report is provided by the following independent directors, who comprise the committee.
Compensation Committee | |||
Alfred Poe,Chairperson | |||
Cynthia T. Jamison | |||
Charles F. Marcy |
29
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to annual and long-term compensation for services in all capacities for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009 paid to our named executive officers.
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary(1) | Stock Awards(2)(3) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation(4) | Change in Pension Value and Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings(5) | All Other Compensation(6) | Total | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
David L. Wenner | 2011 | $ | 513,000 | $ | 424,080 | $ | 513,000 | $ | 148,243 | $ | 17,350 | $ | 1,615,673 | |||||||||
President and Chief Executive Officer | 2010 | 489,670 | 1,182,625 | 493,000 | 102,704 | 17,350 | 2,285,349 | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 473,000 | 239,042 | 473,000 | 68,953 | 17,350 | 1,271,345 | ||||||||||||||||
Robert C. Cantwell | 2011 | $ | 366,000 | $ | 226,918 | $ | 256,200 | $ | 173,696 | $ | 17,350 | $ | 1,040,164 | |||||||||
Executive Vice President of Finance | 2010 | 352,000 | 207,160 | 246,400 | 87,023 | 17,350 | 909,933 | |||||||||||||||
and Chief Financial Officer | 2009 | 339,750 | 128,112 | 236,600 | 47,804 | 17,350 | 769,616 | |||||||||||||||
Vanessa E. Maskal | 2011 | $ | 278,000 | $ | 114,902 | $ | 194,600 | $ | 96,671 | $ | 17,350 | $ | 701,523 | |||||||||
Executive Vice President of Sales and | 2010 | 267,000 | 104,757 | 186,900 | 52,966 | 17,350 | 628,973 | |||||||||||||||
Marketing | 2009 | 257,019 | 64,435 | 178,500 | 24,668 | 17,350 | 541,972 | |||||||||||||||
Scott E. Lerner | 2011 | $ | 286,000 | $ | 118,212 | $ | 200,200 | $ | 38,716 | $ | 17,350 | $ | 660,478 | |||||||||
Executive Vice President, | 2010 | 275,000 | 107,892 | 192,500 | 14,902 | 16,695 | 606,989 | |||||||||||||||
General Counsel, Secretary and | 2009 | 265,000 | 66,962 | 185,500 | 7,697 | 17,350 | 542,509 | |||||||||||||||
Chief Compliance Officer | ||||||||||||||||||||||
William F. Herbes | 2011 | $ | 273,000 | $ | 112,829 | $ | 191,100 | $ | 35,693 | $ | 17,350 | $ | 629,972 | |||||||||
Executive Vice President of Operations | 2010 | 262,500 | 627,993 | 183,750 | 30,830 | 12,201 | 1,117,274 |
Assuming that maximum performance goals were met, the value of the awards at date of grant, or in certain cases, deemed date of grant (calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 as set forth above), would have been as follows: 2009—Mr. Wenner, $564,000; Mr. Cantwell, $384,338; Ms. Maskal $193,305; and Mr. Lerner, $200,886; 2010—Mr. Wenner, $1,956,342; Mr. Cantwell, $621,480; Ms. Maskal $314,272; Mr. Lerner, $323,676 and Mr. Herbes, $833,979; and 2011—Mr. Wenner, $1,272,240; Mr. Cantwell, $680,754; Ms. Maskal $344,706; Mr. Lerner, $354,637 and Mr. Herbes, $338,487. For 2009, includes the 2009 to 2011 LTIAs. For 2010, includes the 2010 to 2012 LTIAs. For Mr. Wenner, 2010 also includes a portion of his 2009 to 2011 LTIAs. For Mr. Herbes, 2010 also includes 2009 to 2010 and 2009 to 2011 discretionary bonus awards. See footnote (3) below. For 2011, includes the 2011 to 2013 LTIAs.
The amounts listed in the "stock awards" column and in this footnote do not reflect the value of common stock actually received by the named executive officers, whether the named executive officer will actually realize a financial benefit from the awards, or the potential value to the named executive officer of the awards that may be earned. Whether, and to what extent, the named executive officers ultimately realize value will depend on many factors, including the actual performance of the company, the price of our common stock when and if shares are actually issued and the named executive officers' continued employment. For more details on performance share LTIA and discretionary bonus grants in 2011, see the Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2011 table below. Additional information regarding performance share LTIAs and discretionary bonuses granted in 2010 and 2011 that are still outstanding can be found in the table Outstanding Equity Awards at 2011 Fiscal Year End table below.
30
2009 to 2011 LTIAs. The 2008 to 2010 and 2009 to 2011 discretionary bonus awards granted to Mr. Herbes were intended to reward Mr. Herbes' for his strong contributions to B&G Foods since his arrival, including to our company's expected achievement of the maximum excess cash objectives set forth in the 2008 to 2010 and 2009 to 2011 LTIAs. Although SEC rules require the entire expected compensation expense relating to the 2008 to 2010 and 2009 to 2011 discretionary bonus awards be included in Mr. Herbes' stock awards total for 2010, the awards were paid in 2011 and 2012.
The following table describes each component of the "all other compensation" column.
Name | Year | Matching Contributions to 401(k) Plan | Automobile Allowance(A) | Total | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
David L. Wenner | 2011 | $ | 7,350 | $ | 10,000 | $ | 17,350 | ||||||
2010 | $ | 7,350 | $ | 10,000 | $ | 17,350 | |||||||
2009 | $ | 7,350 | $ | 10,000 | $ | 17,350 | |||||||
Robert C. Cantwell | 2011 | $ | 7,350 | $ | 10,000 | $ | 17,350 | ||||||
2010 | $ | 7,350 | $ | 10,000 | $ | 17,350 | |||||||
2009 | $ | 7,350 | $ | 10,000 | $ | 17,350 | |||||||
Vanessa E. Maskal | 2011 | $ | 7,350 | $ | 10,000 | $ | 17,350 | ||||||
2010 | $ | 7,350 | $ | 10,000 | $ | 17,350 | |||||||
2009 | $ | 7,350 | $ | 10,000 | $ | 17,350 | |||||||
Scott E. Lerner | 2011 | $ | 7,350 | $ | 10,000 | $ | 17,350 | ||||||
2010 | $ | 6,695 | $ | 10,000 | $ | 16,695 | |||||||
2009 | $ | 7,350 | $ | 10,000 | $ | 17,350 | |||||||
William F. Herbes | 2011 | $ | 7,350 | $ | 10,000 | $ | 17,350 | ||||||
2010 | $ | 2,201 | $ | 10,000 | $ | 12,201 |
31
Grants of Plan Based Awards in Fiscal 2011
The following table sets forth information about non-equity and equity awards granted to the named executive officers in fiscal 2011.
| | | | | | | | All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (# of shares) | | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards(2) ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Grant Date | Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Maximum ($) | Threshold (# of shares) | Target (# of shares) | Maximum (# of shares) | |||||||||||||||||||||
David L. Wenner | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 Annual Bonus Plan(1) | N/A | — | $ | 256,500 | $ | 513,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 - 2013 LTIAs | 2/22/2011 | 18,000 | 36,000 | 108,000 | — | $ | 424,080 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Robert C. Cantwell | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 Annual Bonus Plan(1) | N/A | — | $ | 128,100 | $ | 256,200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 - 2013 LTIAs | 2/22/2011 | 9,631 | 19,263 | 57,789 | — | $ | 226,918 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Vanessa E. Maskal | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 Annual Bonus Plan(1) | N/A | — | $ | 97,300 | $ | 194,600 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 - 2013 LTIAs | 2/22/2011 | 4,877 | 9,754 | 29,262 | — | $ | 114,902 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Scott E. Lerner | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 Annual Bonus Plan(1) | N/A | — | $ | 100,100 | $ | 200,200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 - 2013 LTIAs | 2/22/2011 | 5,017 | 10,035 | 30,105 | — | $ | 118,212 | |||||||||||||||||||||
William F. Herbes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 Annual Bonus Plan(1) | N/A | — | $ | 95,550 | $ | 191,100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 - 2013 LTIAs | 2/22/2011 | 4,789 | 9,578 | 28,734 | — | $ | 112,829 |
The amounts listed in this column do not reflect whether the named executive officer will actually realize a financial benefit from the awards, or the potential value to the named executive officer of the awards that may be earned. Whether, and to what extent, the named executive officers ultimately realize value will depend on many factors, including the actual performance of the company, the price of our common stock when and if shares are actually issued and the named executive officers' continued employment.
32
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2011 Fiscal Year-End
The following table provides information on the outstanding equity awards held by the named executive officers as of December 31, 2011. None of the named executive officers held any option awards at December 31, 2011.
| Stock Awards(1) | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name | Number of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested (#) | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Performance Period | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights that Have Not Vested(2) (#) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights that Have Not Vested(2) ($) | |||||||||||
David L. Wenner | 2010 to 2012 | 159,201 | $ | 3,831,968 | ||||||||||||
2011 to 2013 | 108,000 | $ | 2,559,560 | |||||||||||||
Robert C. Cantwell | 2010 to 2012 | 85,251 | $ | 2,051,992 | ||||||||||||
2011 to 2013 | 57,789 | $ | 1,390,981 | |||||||||||||
Vanessa E. Maskal | 2010 to 2012 | 43,110 | $ | 1,037,658 | ||||||||||||
2011 to 2013 | 29,262 | $ | 704,336 | |||||||||||||
Scott E. Lerner | 2010 to 2012 | 44,400 | $ | 1,068,708 | ||||||||||||
2011 to 2013 | 30,105 | $ | 724,627 | |||||||||||||
William F. Herbes | 2010 to 2012 | 42,384 | $ | 893,815 | ||||||||||||
2011 to 2013 | 28,734 | $ | 691,627 |
As noted in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement, the number of shares that may be earned by each named executive officer from threshold to maximum is determined at the beginning of the performance period based upon the price of our common stock at the date of grant of the performance share LTIA. Therefore, the value of the award at the end of the performance period will depend not only upon the level at which the performance goals have been achieved but will also depend on the price of our common stock at the end of the performance period when the shares of common stock are actually issued to the participants. As a result, a substantial portion of the value of the potential awards as of the end of fiscal 2011 set forth in the last column of this table is attributable to the 159.0% increase in our stock price from the date of grant of the 2010 to 2012 LTIAs through the end of fiscal 2011, and the 68.9% increase in our stock price from the date of grant of the 2011 to 2013 LTIAs through the end of fiscal 2011.
33
Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal 2011
The following table provides information on the value of stock awards that vested during fiscal 2011 for each of our named executive officers. None of our named executive officers held any stock options during fiscal 2011. Therefore, no stock options were exercised by our named executive officers during fiscal 2011.
Name | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) | Value Realized on Vesting(2) ($) | Shares Withheld to Cover Tax Withholding (#) | Net Number of Shares Received (#) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
David L. Wenner(1) | 381,450 | $ | 8,700,875 | 172,498 | 208,952 | ||||||||
Robert C. Cantwell(1) | 204,435 | $ | 4,663,162 | 90,314 | 114,121 | ||||||||
Vanessa E. Maskal(1) | 102,822 | $ | 2,345,370 | 43,100 | 59,722 | ||||||||
Scott E. Lerner(1) | 106,854 | $ | 2,437,340 | 45,009 | 61,845 | ||||||||
William F. Herbes(1) | 14,385 | $ | 328,122 | 4,991 | 9,394 |
As noted in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement, the number of shares that may be earned by each named executive officer from threshold to maximum is determined at the beginning of the performance period based upon the price of our common stock at the date of grant of the performance share LTIA. Therefore, the value of the award at the end of the performance period depends not only upon the level at which the performance goals have been achieved but also depends on the price of our common stock at the end of the performance period when the shares of common stock are actually issued to the participants. As a result, a substantial portion of the value of the awards set forth in the last column of this table is attributable to the 547.0% increase in our stock price from the date of grant of the 2009 to 2011 LTIAs through February 13, 2012.
Management Employment Agreements
We have entered into employment agreements with each of our named executive officers. Each executive's base salary as set forth above in the summary compensation table is subject to annual increases at the discretion of the compensation committee. Each executive is eligible to earn additional incentive compensation under our annual bonus plan and any other incentive compensation programs we provide. Each executive is also entitled to (1) receive individual disability and life insurance coverage, (2) receive other executive benefits, including an automobile allowance and cell phone
34
allowance, (3) participate in all employee benefits plans maintained by us for our employees and (4) receive other customary employee benefits.
Each agreement is subject to automatic one-year extensions, unless earlier terminated. Each agreement may be terminated by the executive at any time for any reason, provided that he or she gives us 60 days advance written notice of his or her resignation, subject to special notice rules in certain instances, including a change in control or in the event that we substantially alter his or her duties so that he or she can no longer perform his or her duties in accordance with his or her agreement with us. Each agreement may also be terminated by us for any reason, including for "cause" (as defined in the employment agreements). We must give 60 days advance written notice if the termination is without cause. During the executive's employment and for one year after his or her voluntary resignation or termination for cause, each executive has agreed that he or she will not be employed or otherwise engaged by any food manufacturer operating in the United States that directly competes with our business.
Severance Benefits
Executive Severance Benefits. To ensure that we are offering a competitive executive compensation program, we believe it is important to provide reasonable severance benefits to our executive officers. In the case of termination by us without cause, termination by us due to the executive's disability, death, or a resignation by the executive described above that is considered to be a termination by us without cause, each executive officer's employment agreement provides that he or she will receive the following severance benefits, in addition to accrued and unpaid compensation and benefits, for a severance period of two years in the case of Mr. Wenner and for a severance period of one year in the case of each of the other named executive officers: (1) salary continuation payments for each year of the applicable severance period in an amount per year equal to 150% of his then current annual salary in the case of Mr. Wenner, and 135% of his or her then current annual base salary in the case of each of the other named executive officers, (2) continuation during the applicable severance period of medical, dental, life insurance and disability insurance for the named executive, his or her spouse and his or her dependents, or if the continuation of all or any of the such benefits is not available because of his or her status as a terminated employee, a payment equal to the market value of such excluded benefits, (3) if legally allowed, two additional years of service credit under our qualified defined benefit pension plan in the case of Mr. Wenner, and one additional year of service credit in the case of each of the other named executive officers and (4) outplacement services.
If a named executive officer's employment with B&G Foods ends during a performance share LTIA performance period due to termination by B&G Foods without cause, there is no accelerated vesting of the LTIAs and therefore the compensation a named executive officer received in respect of such LTIAs is not included in the table below. Instead, after the performance period is completed, the named executive officer will be entitled to a pro rata portion of the number of performance shares, if any, he or she would have received had the named executive officer remained employed until the end of the performance period. The pro rata portion will be based on the number of full months in the performance period during which the named executive officer was employed as compared to the total number of months in the performance period.
The estimated severance and other benefits for each named executive officer in the event a termination by us without cause are set forth below. The amounts assume that the termination without cause was effective as of December 30, 2011 (the last business day of fiscal 2011) and thus are based
35
upon amounts earned through such date and are only estimates of the amounts that would actually be paid to such named executive officers upon their termination.
Name | Continuation of Salary | Continuation of Health Care and Other Insurance Benefits | Estimated Present Value of Additional Pension Credits | Total | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
David L. Wenner | $ | 1,593,000 | $ | 63,503 | $ | 66,551 | $ | 1,723,054 | |||||
Robert C. Cantwell | $ | 508,950 | $ | 28,074 | $ | 24,441 | $ | 561,465 | |||||
Vanessa E. Maskal | $ | 388,800 | $ | 31,606 | $ | 26,454 | $ | 446,860 | |||||
Scott E. Lerner | $ | 399,600 | $ | 31,633 | $ | 12,482 | $ | 443,715 | |||||
William F. Herbes | $ | 380,700 | $ | 20,675 | $ | 27,527 | $ | 428,902 |
Change in Control Severance Benefits. From time to time, we may explore potential transactions that could result in a change in control of our company. We believe that when a transaction is perceived as imminent, or is taking place, we should be able to receive and rely on the disinterested service of our executive officers, without them being distracted or concerned by the personal uncertainties and risks associated with such a situation. We further believe that our stockholders are best served if their interests are aligned with the interests of our executives, and providing change in control benefits should eliminate, or at least reduce, the reluctance of senior management to pursue potential transactions that may enhance the value of our stockholders' investments.
In accordance with the respective employment agreements of Mr. Cantwell, Ms. Maskal, Mr. Lerner and Mr. Herbes, the severance period set forth above will be increased to two years after his or her termination of employment if his or her termination is following a change in control. In addition, if the executive terminates his or her employment following a change in control and becomes subject to the excise tax imposed under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, his or her payments will be increased so that he or she will be in the same after-tax economic position that he would be in if the excise tax did not apply.
The estimated severance and other benefits for each named executive officer in the event a change in control and termination of employment, and the potential tax obligations of the company for these benefits are set forth below. The amounts assume that the change of control and termination was effective as of December 30, 2011 (the last business day of fiscal 2011) and thus are based upon amounts earned through such date and are only estimates of the amounts that would actually be paid
36
to such named executive officers upon their termination and the potential tax obligations of the company.
Name | Continuation of Salary | Continuation of Health Care and Other Insurance Benefits | Estimated Present Value of Additional Pension Credits | Accelerated Vesting of LTIAs(1) | Gross Up for Excise Taxes(2) | Total | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
David L. Wenner | $ | 1,593,000 | $ | 63,503 | $ | 66,551 | $ | 1,140,388 | — | $ | 2,863,442 | ||||||||
Robert C. Cantwell | $ | 1,017,900 | $ | 56,148 | $ | 48,881 | $ | 610,552 | — | $ | 1,733,481 | ||||||||
Vanessa E. Maskal | $ | 777,600 | $ | 63,212 | $ | 52,909 | $ | 308,850 | $ | 427,601 | $ | 1,630,172 | |||||||
Scott E. Lerner | $ | 799,200 | $ | 63,266 | $ | 24,964 | $ | 318,005 | — | $ | 1,205,435 | ||||||||
William F. Herbes | $ | 761,400 | $ | 41,350 | $ | 55,055 | $ | 303,555 | $ | 456,510 | $ | 1,617,870 |
Release. The obligation of B&G Foods to provide the salary continuation and other severance benefits described above is contingent upon and subject to the execution and delivery by the executive officer of a general release. The general release is required to provide that for and in consideration of the salary continuation and other severance benefits, the executive officer release any and all claims and rights ensuing from his employment with and termination from our company, which he or she may have against the company or any of our subsidiaries or other affiliates, and their respective directors, officers, employees and agents, arising from or related to his employment or termination.
We maintain a tax-qualified defined contribution plan with a cash or deferred arrangement intended to qualify under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Our employees become eligible to participate in the plan upon completing six months of employment. Each participant in the plan may elect to defer, in the form of contributions to the plan, up to 75% of compensation that would otherwise be paid to the participant in the applicable year, which percentage may be increased or decreased by the administrative committee of the plan, but is otherwise not to exceed the statutorily prescribed annual limit ($16,500 in 2011 if the participant is under age 50, and $22,000 in 2011 if age is 50 or over). We make a 50% matching contribution with respect to each participant's elective contributions up to six percent of such participant's compensation (provided that for fiscal 2011, matching contributions were based only on the first $245,000 of such participant's compensation). Matching contributions become fully vested after five years of employment with the company.
We maintain a pension plan for certain eligible employees meeting minimum eligibility requirements in which each of our named executive officers participates. The pension plan is designed and administered to qualify under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The pension plan provides unreduced retirement benefits at age 62 based on the average of the five highest consecutive years of earnings in the last ten years. Benefits under the plan are calculated generally under a formula of 0.75% of final average earnings, plus an additional 0.4% of final average earnings in excess of a 35-year average Social Security taxable wage base, in each case, multiplied by
37
service limited to 35 years. The compensation covered by the pension plan is W-2 earnings and any amounts contributed to any tax qualified profit sharing plan or cafeteria plan. As required by Section 401(a)(17) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, for 2011, benefits under the pension plan were based only on the first $245,000 of an employee's annual earnings. In certain cases, additional years of credited service may be granted as described above under "Management Employment Agreements—Severance Benefits." In most cases, employees are not entitled to a lump sum payment of the pension benefits. Upon retirement, the total amount of accumulated benefits is calculated as a monthly installment and is paid out over the remaining life of the employee (or if elected, over the lives of the employee and his or her beneficiary at a reduced monthly benefit).
Name | Number of Years of Credited Service | Present Value of Accumulated Benefit(1) | Payments During Last Fiscal Year | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
David L. Wenner | 22 | $ | 740,384 | — | ||||||
Robert C. Cantwell | 28 | $ | 618,053 | — | ||||||
Vanessa E. Maskal | 10 | $ | 264,545 | — | ||||||
Scott E. Lerner | 6 | $ | 80,094 | — | ||||||
William F. Herbes | 2 | $ | 66,523 | — |
38
PROPOSAL NO. 2—ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, or the Dodd-Frank Act, enables our stockholders to vote to approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement in accordance with the SEC's rules.
As described in detail under the heading "Compensation Discussion and Analysis," our executive compensation programs, which are based upon the guiding principal of "pay for performance," are designed to attract, motivate, and retain our named executive officers, reinforce the execution of our business strategy and the achievement of our business objectives; and align the interests of our executive officers with the interests of our stockholders, with the ultimate objective of improving stockholder value. Under these programs, our named executive officers are rewarded for the achievement of annual and long-term goals and the realization of increased stockholder value. Please read the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" beginning on page 19 for additional details about our executive compensation programs, including information about the fiscal 2011 compensation of our named executive officers.
We believe that our compensation program has been instrumental in helping the company achieve strong financial performance and stockholder value. Therefore, we are asking our stockholders to indicate their support for our named executive officer compensation as described in this proxy statement. This proposal, commonly known as a "say on pay" proposal, gives our stockholders the opportunity to express their views on our named executive officers' compensation. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this proxy statement.
The say on pay vote is advisory, and therefore not binding on our company, the compensation committee or our board of directors. However, our board of directors and our compensation committee value the opinions of our stockholders and will consider the outcome of the vote and the concerns of our stockholders when making future decisions on the compensation of our named executive officers and our company's compensation principles, policies and procedures.
Approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of the shares of common stock voting in person or by proxy at the annual meeting.
Recommendation of the Board of Directors
The board of directors recommends that the stockholders vote "FOR" the proposal to approve, in an advisory manner, the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in this proxy statement pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC.
39
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth information as of March 15, 2012 with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock, and shows the number of and percentage owned by:
Unless otherwise specified, all shares are directly held.
Beneficial ownership of shares is determined under the rules of the SEC and generally includes any shares over which a person exercises sole or shared voting or investment power. Except as indicated by footnote, and subject to applicable community property laws, each person identified in the table possesses sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of stock held by such person. As of March 15, 2012, 48,369,789 shares of common stock were outstanding.
| Common Stock | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name of Beneficial Owner | Shares | Percentage | |||||
BlackRock, Inc.(1) | 3,479,015 | 7.2 | % | ||||
The Vanguard Group, Inc(2) | 3,359,061 | 6.9 | % | ||||
Prudential Financial, Inc.(3) | 2,888,256 | 6.0 | % | ||||
Jennison Associates LLC(4) | 2,749,681 | 5.7 | % | ||||
David L. Wenner(5) | 534,678 | 1.1 | % | ||||
Robert C. Cantwell(6) | 231,712 | * | |||||
Vanessa E. Maskal | 93,279 | * | |||||
Scott E. Lerner | 67,106 | * | |||||
William F. Herbes | 18,402 | * | |||||
Cynthia T. Jamison | 12,038 | * | |||||
Charles F. Marcy | 7,608 | * | |||||
Dennis M. Mullen | 15,638 | * | |||||
Cheryl M. Palmer | 5,108 | * | |||||
Alfred Poe | 15,638 | * | |||||
Stephen C. Sherrill(7) | 150,638 | * | |||||
All current directors and executive officers as a group (12 persons) | 1,198,286 | 2.5 | % |
40
a parent holding company, may be deemed to beneficially own 2,888,256 shares that are beneficially owned by its subsidiaries. Prudential has the sole power to vote or to direct the vote of 246,406 shares, the shared power to vote or to direct the vote of 2,636,395 shares, the sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of 246,406 shares, and the shared power to dispose or to direct the disposition of 2,641,850 shares. Because Prudential indirectly owns 100% of the equity interests of Jennison Associates LLC, Prudential may be deemed to have the power to exercise or direct the exercise of the voting and dispositive power that Jennison may be deemed to have with respect to the shares owned by the portfolio managed by Jennison. Jennison does not file jointly with Prudential; therefore, the shares reported on Jennison's Schedule 13G/A may be included in the shares reported on Prudential's Schedule 13G/A. See footnote (4) below.
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended requires our directors and executive officers and any persons who own more than ten percent of our common stock to file with the SEC various reports as to ownership of and changes of ownership in any class of equity securities of our company. Such persons are required by SEC regulation to furnish us with copies of all Section 16 reports they file. As a practical matter, B&G Foods assists its directors and officers by monitoring transactions and completing and filing Section 16 reports on their behalf. To our knowledge, the Section 16(a) filing requirements were met on a timely basis during fiscal 2011.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Review and Approval of Related Party Transactions
Our board of directors recognizes that transactions involving our company and related parties present heightened risk of potential or actual conflicts of interest which may interfere—or even appear to interfere—with the interests of our company. Therefore, it is the policy of our company (as set forth in our corporate governance guidelines) that an independent committee designated by the board shall review, approve or ratify any transaction with related parties required to be reported by our company under the applicable rules and regulations governing related party transactions promulgated by the SEC.
Fiscal 2011 Related Party Transactions
In fiscal 2011, there were no related party transactions with any director or executive officer of B&G Foods or any other related person, as defined in Rule 404 under Regulation S-K promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and none is proposed.
41
Under the guidance of a written charter adopted by our board of directors, the audit committee oversees our management's conduct of the financial reporting process on behalf of the board of directors. A copy of the charter is available at the investor relations section of our company's website, http://ir.bgfoods.com. The audit committee also appoints the independent registered public accounting firm to be retained to audit our company's consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, and once retained, the independent registered public accounting firm reports directly to the audit committee. The audit committee is responsible for pre-approving both audit and non-audit services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. The audit committee's charter reflects the above-mentioned responsibilities, and the audit committee and the board of directors periodically review and revise the charter.
Management is responsible for our company's financial reporting process, including the system of internal controls, and for the preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Our company's independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for auditing those consolidated financial statements and expressing an opinion on the conformity of the consolidated financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, our company's independent registered public accounting firm will express its own opinion on the effectiveness of the company's internal control over financial reporting. The audit committee's responsibility is to monitor and review these processes. It is not the audit committee's duty or responsibility to conduct auditing or accounting reviews.
The audit committee meets at least four times annually, or more frequently as circumstances dictate. During fiscal 2011, the audit committee met five times. The audit committee also met with management periodically to consider the adequacy of our company's internal controls, and discussed these matters and the overall scope and plans for the audit of our company with our independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP. The audit committee met with the independent registered public accounting firm, with and without management present, to discuss the results of its examination, its evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, and the overall quality of our financial reporting. The audit committee also discussed with senior management our company's disclosure controls and procedures and the certifications by our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, which are required by the SEC under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for certain of our company's filings with the SEC. The audit committee also met separately from time to time with our chief financial officer and with our general counsel, and at least quarterly, the audit committee met in executive session.
In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the audit committee reviewed and discussed with management and the independent registered public accounting firm the audited consolidated financial statements in the annual report for the year ended December 31, 2011, management's assessment of the effectiveness of our company's internal control over financial reporting and the independent registered public accounting firm's evaluation of the effectiveness of our company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011. The audit committee reviewed with the independent registered public accounting firm, who is responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of the consolidated financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, its judgments as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of our company's accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements and such other matters as are required to be discussed with the audit committee under auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). In addition, the audit committee has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm its independence from our company and our management, including the matters in the written disclosures and letter which were received by the audit committee from the independent registered public accounting firm as
42
required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB, and considered the compatibility of non-audit services with KPMG LLP's independence.
In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the audit committee recommended to the board of directors (and the board approved) that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 for filing with the SEC.
Audit Committee
Cynthia T. Jamison,Chairperson
Dennis M. Mullen
Alfred Poe
PROPOSAL NO. 3—APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM
The audit committee has appointed KPMG LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit our consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting for the fiscal year ending December 29, 2012.
We are asking our stockholders to ratify the selection of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm. Although ratification is not required by our bylaws or otherwise, our board of directors is submitting the selection of KPMG LLP to our stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. If the selection is not ratified, the audit committee will consider whether it is appropriate to select another registered public accounting firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the audit committee in its discretion may select a different registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the company and our stockholders.
One or more representatives of KPMG LLP are expected to be present at the annual meeting. They will have an opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate stockholder questions.
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees
In addition to performing the audit of our consolidated financial statements and our internal control over financial reporting, KPMG LLP has provided various other services during fiscal 2011 and 2010. The aggregate fees billed or expected to be billed for fiscal 2011 and 2010 for each of the following categories of services are as follows:
Type of Fees | Fiscal 2011 | Fiscal 2010 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Audit Fees | $ | 1,242,500 | $ | 933,250 | |||
Audit-Related Fees | — | — | |||||
Tax Fees | — | — | |||||
All Other Fees | — | — | |||||
Total | $ | 1,242,500 | $ | 933,250 | |||
In accordance with the SEC's definitions and rules the terms in the above table have the following meanings:
"Audit Fees" are the aggregate fees billed or expected to be billed for each of fiscal 2011 and 2010 for professional services rendered by KPMG LLP for the audit of our consolidated financial statements
43
included in our annual reports on Form 10-K and review of the unaudited consolidated financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q; for the audit of our internal control over financial reporting with the objective of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects; and for services that are normally provided by KPMG LLP in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for fiscal 2011 and 2010. Audit fees for fiscal 2011 and 2010 also included fees billed for professional services rendered with respect to engagements, consents, comfort letters and assistance with the review of our filings with the SEC in connection with a shelf registration statement and a public offering of senior notes in 2010 pursuant to a prior shelf registration statement. Audit fees for fiscal 2011 also included fees billed for professional services rendered relating to our acquisition of the Culver Specialty Brands and the new credit agreement we entered into to finance that acquisition.
"Audit-Related Fees" are the aggregate fees billed in each of fiscal 2011 and 2010 for assurance and related services by KPMG LLP that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements. No audit-related services were provided by KPMG LLP during fiscal 2011 and 2010.
"Tax Fees" are the aggregate fees billed in each of fiscal 2011 and 2010 for professional services rendered by KPMG LLP for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. No tax compliance, tax advice or tax planning services were provided by KPMG LLP during fiscal 2011 and 2010.
"All Other Fees" are the aggregate fees billed in each of fiscal 2011 and 2010 for products and services provided by KPMG LLP not included in the first three categories. No such other products or services were provided by KPMG LLP during fiscal 2011 and 2010.
The audit committee has reviewed summaries of the services provided by KPMG LLP and the related fees, and the audit committee has determined that the provision of the non-audit services described above is compatible in maintaining the independence of KPMG LLP.
All of the services described above were pre-approved by our audit committee in accordance with its pre-approval policy. The audit committee pre-approval policy provides that all auditing services and all non-audit services to be provided by KPMG LLP be pre-approved by the audit committee, provided that the audit committee shall not approve any prohibited non-audit services set forth in Section 10A(g) of the Exchange Act.
Ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of the shares of common stock voting in person or by proxy at the annual meeting.
Recommendation of the Board of Directors
The board of directors recommends that the stockholders vote "FOR" the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 29, 2012.
44
Our management is not aware of any other matters to be presented for action at the annual meeting; however, if any such matters are properly presented for action, it is the intention of the proxy appointees to vote in accordance with their best judgment on such matters.
Stockholder Proposals for Inclusion in Our 2013 Annual Meeting Proxy Statement and Proxy Card
Under the rules of the SEC, any stockholder proposal to be considered by us for inclusion in our 2012 proxy statement and form of proxy card for next year's annual meeting of stockholders, expected to be held in May 2012, must be received by our corporate secretary at our principal executive offices located at Four Gatehall Drive, Parsippany, NJ 07054, not later than November 30, 2012 (120 days prior to the first anniversary of this proxy statement). The SEC rules set forth standards as to what stockholder proposals are required to be included in a proxy statement.
In addition, our bylaws establish an advance notice procedure with regard to stockholder proposals, including stockholder proposals not included in our proxy statement, to be brought before an annual meeting of stockholders. In general, notice must be received by our corporate secretary not less than 120 days nor more than 150 days prior to the first anniversary of this proxy statement and must contain specified information concerning the matters to be brought before the meeting and concerning the stockholder making the proposal. If no annual meeting was held in the previous year, notice must be received not less than 10 days following the earlier of the day on which notice of the meeting date was mailed and the public announcement of such meeting date. Therefore, to be presented at next year's annual meeting, stockholder proposals, whether or not submitted for consideration for inclusion in our proxy statement, must be received on or after October 31, 2012 but not later than November 30, 2012.
Some brokers, banks and other nominee record holders may be participating in the practice of "householding" proxy statements and annual reports or notices of Internet availability of proxy materials, as applicable. This means that only one copy of such items may have been sent to multiple stockholders in your household. B&G Foods will promptly deliver a separate copy of these documents to you if you so request by writing or calling as follows: B&G Foods, Inc., Attention: Corporate Secretary, Four Gatehall Drive, Parsippany, NJ 07054; telephone, 973.401.6500. If you want to receive separate copies of the annual report and proxy statement or notice of Internet availability of proxy materials, as applicable, in the future, or if you are receiving multiple copies and would like to receive only one copy for your household, you should contact your broker, bank or other nominee record holder, or you may contact us at the above address and phone number.
By Order of the Board of Directors, | ||
![]() | ||
Scott E. Lerner Secretary |
Parsippany, New Jersey
March 30, 2012
45
21743 FOLD AND DETACH HERE To vote by mail, mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. B&G FOODS, INC. Mark Here for Address Change or Comments SEE REVERSE NOTE: Please sign as name appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. Signature Signature Date YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. PLEASE VOTE TODAY. Please mark your votes as indicated in this example X FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR each of the nominees in Proposal No. 1 and FOR each of Proposal Nos. 2 and 3. VOTE FOR ALL Nominees: WITHHOLD FOR ALL VOTE FOR ALL EXCEPT* 1. Election of Directors (Proposal No. 1): 01 Robert C. Cantwell 02 Cynthia T. Jamison 03 Charles F. Marcy 04 Dennis M. Mullen 05 Cheryl M. Palmer 06 Alfred Poe 07 Stephen C. Sherrill 08 David L. Wenner *To withhold authority to vote for one or more nominee(s), mark “Vote for All Except” and write the name(s) of the nominee(s) for which you are withholding authority below: 4. Other Matters: In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other matters as may properly come before the Annual Meeting. If this proxy is properly executed, the shares of Common Stock covered hereby will be voted as specified herein. If no specification is made, such shares will be voted “FOR” each of the nominees in Proposal No. 1 and “FOR” each of Proposal Nos. 2 and 3; and in the discretion of the persons named as proxies as to any other matter that may properly come before the Annual Meeting. The undersigned hereby revokes all previous proxies. 2. Approval, by non-binding advisory vote, of executive compensation (Proposal No. 2): 3. Ratification of Appointment of KPMG LLP as Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Proposal No. 3): |
21743 You can now access your B&G Foods, Inc. account online. Access your B&G Foods, Inc. account online via Investor ServiceDirect® (ISD). The transfer agent for B&G Foods, Inc., now makes it easy and convenient to get current information on your shareholder account. • View account status • View payment history for dividends • View certificate history • Make address changes • View book-entry information • Obtain a duplicate 1099 tax form Visit us on the web at http://www.bnymellon.com/shareowner/equityaccess For Technical Assistance Call 1-877-978-7778 between 9am-7pm Monday-Friday Eastern Time Investor ServiceDirect® Available 24 hours per day, 7 days per week TOLL FREE NUMBER: 1-800-370-1163 Important notice regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials for the Annual Meeting. The Proxy Statement and the 2011 Annual Report to Stockholders are available at: http://materials.proxyvote.com/05508R Choose MLinkSM for fast, easy and secure 24/7 online access to your future proxy materials, investment plan statements, tax documents and more. Simply log on to Investor ServiceDirect® at www.bnymellon.com/shareowner/equityaccess where step-by-step instructions will prompt you through enrollment. Address Change/Comments (Mark the corresponding box on the reverse side) SHAREOWNER SERVICES P.O. BOX 3550 SOUTH HACKENSACK, NJ 07606-9250 FOLD AND DETACH HERE (Continued and to be marked, dated and signed, on the other side) B&G FOODS, INC. PROXY FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS MAY 15, 2012 THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS The undersigned holder of Common Stock of B&G FOODS, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby constitute and appoint Robert C. Cantwell and Scott E. Lerner, or either one of them, with full power to act alone and to designate substitutes, the true and lawful proxies of the undersigned for and in the name and stead of the undersigned, to vote all shares of Common Stock of the Company which the undersigned would be entitled to vote if personally present at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at the Sheraton Parsippany Hotel, 199 Smith Rd., Parsippany, NJ 07054, on May 15, 2012 at 10:00 a.m., local time, and at any and all adjournments and postponements thereof (the “Annual Meeting”), on all matters that may come before such Annual Meeting. Said proxies are instructed to vote on the following matters in the manner herein specified. |