B&G Foods (BGS) 10-Q 2006 Q3 Quarterly report

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 1, 2006

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark one)
x	Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
	For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006
	or
o	Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
	For the transition period from                 to                .

Commission file number 001-32316

B&G FOODS, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	13-3918742
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
4 Gatehall Drive, Suite 110, Parsippany, New Jersey	07054
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (973) 401-6500

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer x Non-accelerated filer o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

As of November 1, 2006, the registrant had 20,000,000 shares of Class A common stock, par value $0.01 per share, and 7,556,443 shares of Class B common stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding.

B&G Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Index

	Page No
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION	1
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)	1
Consolidated Balance Sheets	1
Consolidated Statements of Operations	2
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	3
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	4
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	14
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	33
Item 4. Controls and Procedures	34
PART II OTHER INFORMATION	35
Item 1. Legal Proceedings	35
Item 1A. Risk Factors	35
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	35
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities	35
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	35
Item 5. Other Information	35
Item 6. Exhibits	35
SIGNATURE	36

i

PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.  Financial Statements (Unaudited)

B&G Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

	September 30, 2006			December 31, 2005
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	20,901		$	25,429
Trade accounts receivable, net	29,627			31,869
Inventories	93,903			85,530
Prepaid expenses	3,298			3,249
Assets held for sale	—			750
Deferred income taxes	3,381			3,381
Income tax receivable	—			618
Total current assets	151,110			150,826
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $45,822 and $40,457	40,709			40,190
Goodwill	198,076			189,028
Trademarks	200,220			194,264
Customer relationship intangibles, net	14,558			—
Net deferred financing costs and other assets	18,168			19,867
Total assets	$	622,841		$	594,175
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Trade accounts payable	$	23,748		$	26,337
Accrued expenses	21,779			16,413
Dividends payable	4,240			4,240
Total current liabilities	49,767			46,990
Long-term debt	430,800			405,800
Other liabilities	190			245
Deferred income taxes	62,776			57,866
Total liabilities	543,533			510,901
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share. Authorized 1,000,000 shares; no shares issued or outstanding	—			—
Class A common stock, $0.01 par value per share. Authorized 100,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 20,000,000 shares	200			200
Class B common stock, $0.01 par value per share. Authorized 25,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 7,556,443 shares	76			76
Additional paid-in capital	123,392			136,112
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(7		)	(57		)
Accumulated deficit	(44,353		)	(53,057		)
Total stockholders’ equity	79,308			83,274
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	622,841		$	594,175

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

1

B&G Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

	Thirteen Weeks Ended						Thirty-nine Weeks Ended
	September 30, 2006			October 1, 2005			September 30, 2006			October 1, 2005
Net sales	$	101,854		$	92,316		$	300,099		$	276,543
Cost of goods sold	72,501			64,472			214,477			194,997
Cost of goods sold—restructuring charge	—			300			—			3,544
Gross profit	29,353			27,544			85,622			78,002
Operating expenses:
Sales, marketing and distribution expenses	11,462			10,364			33,531			31,224
General and administrative expenses	1,593			1,697			5,056			5,024
Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment	(525		)	—			(525		)	—
Amortization expense—customer relationships	188			—			542			—
Operating income	16,635			15,483			47,018			41,754
Other expenses:
Interest expense, net	11,009			10,458			32,796			31,320
Income before income tax expense	5,626			5,025			14,222			10,434
Income tax expense	2,183			1,965			5,518			4,080
Net income	$	3,443		$	3,060		$	8,704		$	6,354
Earnings per share calculations:
Net income available to common stockholders per share of common stock:
Basic and diluted distributed earnings:
Class A common stock	$	0.21		$	0.21		$	0.64		$	0.64
Earnings (loss) per share:
Basic and diluted Class A common stock	$	0.18		$	0.17		$	0.49		$	0.41
Basic and diluted Class B common stock	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.15	)	$	(0.23	)

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

2

B&G Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)

	Thirty-nine Weeks Ended
	September 30, 2006			October 1, 2005
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	8,704		$	6,354
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	5,863			5,129
Amortization of deferred debt issuance costs	2,122			2,094
Deferred income taxes	4,910			4,647
Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment	(525		)	—
Restructuring charge—property, plant, equipment and inventory impairment	—			2,951
Changes in assets and liabilities, excluding effects of business combinations:
Trade accounts receivable	2,242			(157		)
Inventories	(8,400		)	(13,370		)
Prepaid expenses	(49		)	(180		)
Income tax receivable	618			(742		)
Other assets	(4		)	—
Trade accounts payable	(2,589		)	702
Accrued expenses	5,339			4,152
Other liabilities	(55		)	(54		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	18,176			11,526
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures	(5,788		)	(4,992		)
Payments for acquisition of businesses	(30,102		)	—
Net proceeds from sale of property	1,275			—
Net cash used in investing activities	(34,615		)	(4,992		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt	25,000			—
Dividends paid	(12,720		)	(12,208		)
Payment of debt issuance costs	(419		)	—
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	11,861			(12,208		)
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash and cash equivalents	50			7
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(4,528		)	(5,667		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	25,429			28,525
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	20,901		$	22,858
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash interest payments	$	25,439		$	24,674
Cash income tax payments	$	500		$	138
Cash income tax refunds	$	(800	)	$	—
Non-cash transactions:
Dividends declared and unpaid	$	4,240		$	4,240

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

B&G Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

(1)Nature of Operations and Recent Acquisitions

B&G Foods, Inc. is a holding company, the principal assets of which are the capital stock of its subsidiaries.  Unless the context requires otherwise, references in this report to “B&G Foods,” “the company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to B&G Foods, Inc. and its subsidiaries.  We operate in one industry segment and manufacture, sell and distribute a diversified portfolio of high-quality shelf-stable foods across the United States, Canada and Puerto Rico.  Our products include jams, jellies and fruit spreads, canned meats and beans, spices, seasonings, marinades, hot sauces, wine vinegar, molasses, maple syrup, salad dressings, Mexican-style sauces, taco shells and kits, salsas, pickles, peppers and other specialty food products.  We compete in the retail grocery, food service, specialty store, private label, club and mass merchandiser channels of distribution.  We distribute these products to retailers in the greater New York metropolitan area through a direct-store-delivery sales and distribution system and elsewhere in the United States through a nationwide network of independent brokers and distributors.

On December 1, 2005, we acquired the Ortega food service dispensing pouch and dipping cup business for approximately $2,513 in cash, including transaction costs, from Nestlé USA, Inc.  On January 10, 2006, we acquired the Grandma’s molasses business for approximately $30,102 in cash, including transaction costs, from Mott’s LLP, a Cadbury Schweppes Americas Beverages company.  In connection with this transaction, we entered into an amendment to our senior secured credit facility to provide for, among other things, a new $25,000 term loan and a reduction in the revolving credit facility commitments from $30,000 to $25,000.  The proceeds of the term loan together with cash on hand were used to fund the Grandma’s molasses acquisition and pay related transaction costs.

The acquisitions described above were accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and, accordingly, the assets acquired and results of operations are included in our consolidated financial statements from the respective dates of the acquisitions.  The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired represents goodwill.  Trademarks are deemed to have an indefinite useful life and are not amortized.  Customer relationship intangibles are amortized over 20 years.  Goodwill, customer relationship intangibles and trademarks are deductible for income tax purposes.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2006, we obtained third-party valuations of certain acquired assets, including intangible assets, and finalized our internal assessments of the purchase price allocations for both the Ortega food service dispensing pouch and dipping cup business acquisition and the Grandma’s molasses acquisition.  The following tables set forth the respective purchase price allocations:

Acquisition of the Ortega food service dispensing pouch and dipping cup business

Inventory	$	873
Indefinite-life intangible assets—trademarks (after allocation of approximately $1,100 of negative goodwill)	1,640
Total	$	2,513

Acquisition of the Grandma’s molasses business

Equipment	$	25
Goodwill	9,877
Indefinite-life intangible assets—trademarks	5,100
Amortizable intangible assets—customer relationships	15,100
Total	$	30,102

4

B&G Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continuted)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

(1)           Nature of Operations and Recent Acquisitions (Continued)

Unaudited Pro Forma Summary of Operations

The acquisitions of the Ortega food service dispensing pouch and dipping cup business and the Grandma’s molasses business did not meet any of the significance tests pursuant to Rule 11-01(b)(1) of Regulation S-X.  As such, no pro forma financial information has been presented.

(2)Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Fiscal Year

Our financial statements are presented on a consolidated basis.  Typically, our fiscal quarters and fiscal year consist of 13 and 52 weeks, respectively, ending on the Saturday closest to December 31st in the case of our fiscal year and fourth fiscal quarter, and on the Saturday closest to the end of the corresponding calendar quarter in the case of our fiscal quarters.  As a result, a 53rd week is added to our fiscal year every five or six years.  In a 53-week fiscal year our fourth fiscal quarter contains 14 weeks.  The fiscal years ending December 30, 2006 (fiscal 2006) and December 31, 2005 (fiscal 2005) each contain 52 weeks.  Each quarter of fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005 contains 13 weeks.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated interim financial statements for the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods ended September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005 have been prepared by our company in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and include the accounts of B&G Foods, Inc. and its subsidiaries.  Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations.  However, our management believes, to the best of their knowledge, that the disclosures herein are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.  All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.  The accompanying unaudited consolidated interim financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting only of normal and recurring adjustments) that are, in the opinion of management, necessary to present fairly our consolidated financial position as of September 30, 2006, the results of our operations for the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods ended September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005 and cash flows for the thirty-nine week periods ended September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005.  Our results of operations for the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods ended September 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.  The accompanying unaudited consolidated interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 filed with the SEC on March 7, 2006.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires our management to make a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Some of the more significant estimates and assumptions made by management involve trade and consumer promotion expenses; allowances for excess, obsolete and unsaleable inventories; the recoverability of goodwill, trademarks, customer relationship intangibles, property, plant and equipment and deferred tax assets; and the

5

B&G Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continuted)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

(2)           Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

accounting for our enhanced income securities (EISs), including their treatment in computing our income tax expense.  Actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions.

Adoption of New Accounting Standards

In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs—An Amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4” (SFAS No. 151). SFAS No. 151 amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, “Inventory Pricing,” to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage). Among other provisions, the new rule requires that items such as idle facility expense, excessive spoilage, double freight, and rehandling costs be recognized as current-period charges regardless of whether they meet the criterion of “so abnormal” as stated in ARB No. 43.  Additionally, SFAS No. 151 requires that the allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS No. 151 was adopted by us beginning on January 1, 2006. The adoption of SFAS No. 151 has not had an impact on our consolidated results of operations and financial position.

In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (FIN 48), which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in tax positions.  FIN 48 requires that we recognize in our consolidated financial statements, the impact of a tax position, if that position is more likely than not of being sustained on audit, based on the technical merits of the position.  We currently recognize the impact of a tax position if it is probable of being sustained.  The provisions of FIN 48 are effective as of the beginning of our 2007 fiscal year, with the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle recorded as an adjustment to opening retained earnings.  At this time, we have not completed our review and assessment of the impact of the adoption of FIN 48.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (SFAS No. 157), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.  The provisions of SFAS No. 157 are effective as of the beginning of our 2008 fiscal year.  We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS No. 157 on our financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employer’s Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans” an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132R (SFAS No. 158).  SFAS No. 158 requires an employer to recognize in its statement of financial position an asset for a defined benefit plan’s over-funded status or a liability for a plan’s under-funded status and recognize changes in the funded status of a defined benefit plan in the year in which the changes occur.  These changes will be reported in our comprehensive income and as a separate component of stockholders’ equity.  SFAS No. 158 is effective for us as of December 30, 2006.  We estimate the impact of adopting SFAS No. 158 to be approximately $5,000, reflected as an increase in accrued expenses and a decrease to stockholders’ equity on our consolidated balance sheet, with no impact to our statements of operations or cash flows.

In September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements” (SAB No. 108), which provides interpretive guidance on the consideration of the effects of prior year misstatements in quantifying current year misstatements for the purpose of a materiality assessment.  SAB No. 108 is effective as of the end of our 2006 fiscal year, allowing a one-time transitional cumulative effect adjustment to beginning retained earnings as of January 1, 2006 for errors that were not previously deemed material, but are material under the guidance in SAB No. 108.  While we are currently evaluating the impact of adopting SAB No. 108, we do not believe that the application of SAB No. 108 will have a material effect on our results of operations or financial position.

6

B&G Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continuted)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

(3)Inventories

Inventories consist of the following, as of the dates indicated:

	September 30, 2006		December 31, 2005
Raw materials and packaging	$	20,122	$	14,544
Work in process	3,211		2,342
Finished goods	70,570		68,644
Total	$	93,903	$	85,530

(4)Asset Held for Sale

On July 1, 2005, we closed our New Iberia, Louisiana, manufacturing facility as part of our ongoing efforts to improve our production capacity utilization, productivity and operating efficiencies, and lower our overall costs.  During the thirteen weeks ended December 31, 2005, we began negotiations for the sale of the land and building and classified the land and building, with a carrying value of $750, as assets held for sale at such time and ceased depreciation.  The sale of our New Iberia facility closed on July 9, 2006.  We received net proceeds of $1,275 and recorded a gain on the sale of $525.

(5)Goodwill, Trademarks and Customer Relationship Intangibles

The following table reconciles the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the period from December 31, 2005 to September 30, 2006:

Balance at December 31, 2005	$	189,028
Grandma’s acquisition	9,877
Purchase price allocation adjustment—Ortega food service dispensing pouch and dipping cup business	(829		)
Balance at September 30, 2006	$	198,076

The following table reconciles the changes in the carrying amount of trademarks for the period from December 31, 2005 to September 30, 2006:

Balance at December 31, 2005	$	194,264
Grandma’s acquisition	5,100
Purchase price allocation adjustment—Ortega food service dispensing pouch and dipping cup business	856
Balance at September 30, 2006	$	200,220

7

B&G Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continuted)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

(5)           Goodwill, Trademarks and Customer Relationship Intangibles (Continued)

Customer relationship intangibles are presented at cost, net of accumulated amortization, and are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of 20 years.

	September 30, 2006			December 31, 2005
Customer relationship intangibles, gross	$	15,100		$	—
Less: accumulated amortization	(542		)	—
Total	$	14,558		$	—

Amortization expense associated with customer relationship intangibles totaled $188 and $542 for the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 and is recorded in operating expenses.

(6)Long-term Debt

Long-term debt consists of the following, as of the date indicated:

	September 30, 2006		December 31, 2005
Revolving credit facility	$	—	$	—
Term loan	25,000		—
Total senior secured credit facility	25,000		—
12.0% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2016	165,800		165,800
8.0% Senior Notes due 2011	240,000		240,000
Total long-term debt	$	430,800	$	405,800

As of September 30, 2006, the aggregate maturities of long-term debt are as follows:

Years ending December:
2006	$	—
2007	—
2008	—
2009	—
2010	—
Thereafter	430,800
Total	$	430,800

Senior Secured Credit Facility.  Concurrent with our initial public offering and concurrent offerings, we entered into a $30,000 senior secured revolving credit facility on October 14, 2004.  In order to finance our acquisition of the Grandma’s molasses brand, we amended the credit facility in January 2006 to provide for, among other things, a new $25,000 term loan and a reduction in the revolving credit facility commitments from $30,000 to $25,000.  As amended, all outstanding indebtedness under the credit facility matures on January 10, 2011.  Interest under the revolving credit facility, including any outstanding letters of credit, is determined based on several alternative rates as stipulated in the revolving credit facility, including the base lending rate per annum plus an applicable margin, or LIBOR plus an applicable margin.  We pay a commitment fee of 0.50% per annum on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility.  Interest under the term loan is variable and is determined based on alternative rates as stipulated in the credit facility, including the base lending rate per annum plus an applicable margin of 1.75%, and LIBOR plus an applicable margin of 2.75%.  As of September 30, 2006, the interest rate for the term loan was 8.36% (based upon a six-month

8

B&G Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continuted)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

(6)           Long-term Debt (Continued)

LIBOR contract that expires on January 17, 2007).  Our obligations under the credit facility are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior basis by all of our existing and future domestic subsidiaries.  The credit facility is secured by substantially all of our and our subsidiaries’ assets except our and our subsidiaries’ real property.  The credit facility provides for mandatory prepayment based on asset dispositions and certain issuances of securities, as defined.  The credit facility contains covenants that restrict, among other things, our ability to incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends and create certain liens.  The credit facility also contains certain financial maintenance covenants, which, among other things, specify maximum capital expenditure limits, a minimum interest coverage ratio and a maximum senior and total leverage ratio, each ratio as defined.  Proceeds of the revolving credit facility are restricted to funding our working capital requirements, capital expenditures and acquisitions of companies in the same line of business as our company, subject to specified criteria.  The revolving credit facility was undrawn on the date of consummation of our initial public offering and concurrent offerings and remained undrawn through September 30, 2006.  The available borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facility, net of outstanding letters of credit of $2,916, was $22,084 at September 30, 2006.  The maximum letter of credit capacity under the revolving credit facility is $10,000, with a fronting fee of 3.0% per annum for all outstanding letters of credit.

Subsidiary Guarantees.  We have no assets or operations independent of our direct and indirect subsidiaries.  All of our domestic subsidiaries jointly and severally, and fully and unconditionally, guarantee our senior subordinated notes and our senior notes, and management has determined that our only subsidiary that is not a guarantor of our senior subordinated notes and senior notes is a “minor” subsidiary as that term is used in Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.  There are no significant restrictions on our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to obtain funds from our respective subsidiaries by dividend or loan.  Consequently, separate financial statements have not been presented for our subsidiaries because management has determined that they would not be material to investors.

Deferred Financing Costs.  In connection with the issuance of our 12.0% senior subordinated notes due 2016 and our 8.0% senior notes due 2011, we capitalized approximately $23,542 of financing costs, which will be amortized over their respective terms.  In connection with the issuance of our term loan in January 2006, we capitalized approximately $419 of additional financing costs, which will be amortized over the term of the loan.  As of September 30, 2006, we had net deferred financing costs of $18,022.

At September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 accrued interest of $13,352 and $8,117, respectively, is included in accrued expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

(7)Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable, income tax receivable, trade accounts payable, accrued expenses and dividends payable are reflected in the consolidated balance sheets at carrying value, which approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

We have outstanding $240,000 principal amount of 8.0% senior notes due 2011.  The fair value of the senior notes at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, based on quoted market prices, was $246,600 and $246,000, respectively.

We also have outstanding $165,800 principal amount of 12.0% senior subordinated notes due 2016.  Of such outstanding principal amount, $143,000 principal amount is represented by 20.0 million EISs.  Each EIS represents one share of our Class A common stock and $7.15 principal amount of our senior subordinated notes.  As of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the fair value of the EISs, based on the per EIS

9

B&G Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continuted)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

(7)           Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Continued)

closing price on the American Stock Exchange on September 29, 2006 and December 31, 2005, was $379,000 and $290,400, respectively.  It is not practicable to estimate the fair value of the $143,000 principal amount of senior subordinated notes represented by the EISs.  Of the $165,800 aggregate principal amount of senior subordinated notes outstanding, $22,800 principal amount is not represented by EISs and trades separately.  The fair value of the separate senior subordinated notes at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, based on quoted market prices, was $25,511.

The carrying value of our other borrowings approximates their fair value based on the information currently available to us with respect to similar instruments.

(8)Comprehensive Income Recognition

Comprehensive income includes the effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash and cash equivalents relating to our Canadian subsidiary.  Comprehensive income was $3,430 and $8,754 for the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006.  Comprehensive income was $3,112 and $6,361 for the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2005.

(9)Pension Benefits

Net periodic costs for the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods ended September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005 include the following components:

	Thirteen Weeks Ended						Thirty-nine Weeks Ended
	September 30, 2006			October 1, 2005			September 30, 2006			October 1, 2005
Service cost—benefits earned during the period	$	367		$	390		$	1,152		$	1,144
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation	303			287			909			840
Expected return on plan assets	(286		)	(244		)	(869		)	(768		)
Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost	16			1			18			3
Net amortization and deferral	41			61			146			157
Net pension cost	$	441		$	495		$	1,356		$	1,376

As of September 30, 2006, we have contributed $1,058 to our defined benefit pension plans during fiscal 2006.  We previously disclosed in our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 that we expected to contribute $1,514 to our defined benefit pension plans in fiscal 2006.  As of September 30, 2006, we anticipate electing to make additional payments of approximately $1,100 for a total contribution of $2,614 for the plan year ended December 30, 2006 to fund our defined benefit pension plan obligations.

(10)Related-Party Transactions

We are party to a transaction services agreement pursuant to which Bruckmann, Rosser, Sherrill & Co., Inc. (BRS & Co.), the manager of Bruckmann, Rosser, Sherrill & Co., L.P. (BRS), will be paid a transaction fee for management, financial and other corporate advisory services rendered by BRS & Co. in connection with acquisitions, divestitures, financings and other transactions by our company, which fee will not exceed 1.0% of the total transaction value.  BRS was our majority owner prior to our initial public offering in October 2004 and remains a majority owner of our Class B common stock.  Stephen C. Sherrill, the chairman of our board of directors, is a managing director of BRS & Co.  In connection with our initial public

10

B&G Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continuted)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

(10)         Related-Party Transactions (Continued)

offering, the transaction services agreement was amended to provide that transaction fees will be payable as described above unless a majority of our disinterested directors determines otherwise.  BRS & Co. did not receive any transaction fees in connection with the initial public offering and the concurrent offerings, the Ortega food service dispensing pouch and dipping cup acquisition or the Grandma’s molasses acquisition.

We lease a manufacturing and warehouse facility from a former chairman of our board of directors under an operating lease, which expires in April 2009.  Total rent expense associated with this lease was $577 for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005.

On January 10, 2006, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, we acquired the Grandma’s molasses business from Mott’s LLP, a Cadbury Schweppes Americas Beverages company, for $30,000 in cash.  James R. Chambers, a member of our board of directors has been the President, Cadbury Schweppes Americas Confectionary since July 2005.  Mr. Chambers did not participate in the negotiation of the transaction nor did he participate in the board’s deliberations or decisions regarding the transaction.  Mr. Chambers did not personally have any direct or indirect pecuniary or other interest in the transaction as a result of his position at Cadbury.

(11)         Commitments and Contingencies

We are subject to environmental laws and regulations in the normal course of business.  We did not make any material expenditures during the thirty-nine week periods ended September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005 in order to comply with environmental laws or regulations.  Based on our experience to date, management believes that the future cost of compliance with existing environmental laws and regulations (and liability for known environmental conditions) will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.  However, we cannot predict what environmental or health and safety legislation or regulations will be enacted in the future or how existing or future laws or regulations will be enforced, administered or interpreted, nor can we predict the amount of future expenditures that may be required in order to comply with such environmental or health and safety laws or regulations or to respond to such environmental claims.

We are involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business, including proceedings involving product liability claims, worker’s compensation and other employee claims, and tort and other general liability claims, for which we carry insurance, as well as trademark, copyright, patent infringement and related claims and legal actions.  In the opinion of our management, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

We have employment agreements with our executive officers.  The agreements generally continue until terminated by the executive or by us, and provide for severance payments under certain circumstances.  As of September 30, 2006, if all of our executives were to be terminated by us without cause (as defined) or as a result of the employees’ disability, our severance liability would be approximately $2,036.

(12)         Restructuring Charge

On July 1, 2005, we closed our New Iberia, Louisiana, manufacturing facility as part of our ongoing efforts to improve our production capacity utilization, productivity and operating efficiencies and lower our overall costs.  In the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, we recorded a charge of $3,839 (of which $300 and $3,544 was recorded in the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods ended October 1, 2005, respectively).  The

11

B&G Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continuted)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

(12)         Restructuring Charge (Continued)

charge for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 included a cash charge for employee compensation and other costs of $769 (of which $162 and $593 was recorded in the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods ended October 1, 2005, respectively) and a non-cash charge for the impairment of property, plant, equipment and inventory of $3,070 (of which $138 and $2,951 was recorded in the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods ended October 1, 2005).  As of December 31, 2005, the entire cash portion of the restructuring charge had been paid.

(13)         Earnings per Share

We have two classes of common stock, designated as Class A common stock and Class B common stock, and we present basic and diluted earnings per share using the two-class method.  The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for each class of common stock according to dividends declared and participation rights in undistributed earnings or losses.

Net income available to our common stockholders is allocated between our two classes of common stock based upon the two-class method.  Basic and diluted earnings per share for our Class A and Class B common stock is calculated by dividing allocated net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of Class A and Class B common stock outstanding.

	Thirteen Weeks Ended						Thirty-nine Weeks Ended
	September 30, 2006			October 1, 2005			September 30, 2006			October 1, 2005
Net income	$	3,443		$	3,060		$	8,704		$	6,354
Less: Class A common stock dividends declared	4,240			4,240			12,720			12,720
Undistributed (loss) earnings available to Class A and Class B common stockholders	$	(797	)	$	(1,180	)	$	(4,016	)	$	(6,366	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic and diluted Class A common shares outstanding	20,000,000			20,000,000			20,000,000			20,000,000
Basic and diluted Class B common shares outstanding	7,556,443			7,556,443			7,556,443			7,556,443
Basic and diluted allocation of undistributed (loss) earnings:
Class A common stock	$	(578	)	$	(856	)	$	(2,915	)	$	(4,620	)
Class B common stock	(219		)	(324		)	(1,101		)	(1,746		)
Total	$	(797	)	$	(1,180	)	$	(4,016	)	$	(6,366	)
Basic and diluted earnings per share:
Undistributed (loss) earnings:
Class A common stock	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.15	)	$	(0.23	)
Class B common stock	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.15	)	$	(0.23	)
Distributed earnings:
Class A common stock	$	0.21		$	0.21		$	0.64		$	0.64
Earnings (loss) per share:
Class A common stock	$	0.18		$	0.17		$	0.49		$	0.41
Class B common stock	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.15	)	$	(0.23	)

12

B&G Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continuted)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

(13)         Earnings per Share (Continued)

No dividends were declared on our Class B common stock during the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 or October 1, 2005; therefore, for purposes of the earnings per share calculation, all distributed earnings are included in Class A common stock earnings per share.

(14)         Business and Credit Concentrations

Our exposure to credit loss in the event of non-payment of accounts receivable by customers is estimated in the amount of the allowance for doubtful accounts.  We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers’ financial conditions.  As of September 30, 2006, we do not believe we have any significant concentration of credit risk with respect to our trade accounts receivable.  Our top ten customers accounted for approximately 43.5% and 41.7% of consolidated net sales for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005, respectively.  Other than Wal-Mart, which accounted for 10.5% of our consolidated net sales for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006, no single customer accounted for 10.0% or more of our consolidated net sales for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 or October 1, 2005.

13

Item 2.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.  Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those set forth under the heading “Forward-Looking Statements” below and elsewhere in this report.  The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated interim financial statements and related notes for the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 included elsewhere in this report and the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (fiscal 2005) included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on March 7, 2006 (2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K).

General

We manufacture, sell and distribute a diversified portfolio of high quality, shelf-stable, branded food products, many of which have leading regional or national retail market shares.  In general, we position our branded products to appeal to the consumer desiring a high quality and reasonably priced branded product.

Our business strategy is to continue to increase sales, profitability and cash available to pay dividends by enhancing our existing portfolio of branded shelf-stable products and by capitalizing on our competitive strengths.  We intend to implement our strategy through the following initiatives: profitably growing our established brands, leveraging our unique multiple-channel sales and distribution system, introducing new products, capitalizing on the higher growth Mexican segment of the food industry, designing new products and modifying existing products to address consumer health and wellness concerns such as diabetes and natural/organic foods, and expanding our brand portfolio through acquisitions.

Since 1996, we have successfully acquired and integrated 17 separate brands into our operations.  We believe that successful future acquisitions, if any, will enhance our portfolio of existing businesses, further leveraging our existing infrastructure.

We completed the acquisition of The Ortega Brand of Business from Nestlé Prepared Foods Company on August 21, 2003, which we refer to in this report as “Ortega” or the “initial Ortega acquisition.”  We subsequently completed the acquisition of the Ortega food service dispensing pouch and dipping cup cheese sauce businesses from Nestlé USA, Inc. on December 1, 2005, which we refer to in this report as the “Ortega food service dispensing pouch and dipping cup acquisition.”  We completed the acquisition of the Grandma’s molasses business from Motts LLP, a Cadbury Schweppes Americas Beverages Company, on January 10, 2006.  Both Ortega acquisitions and the Grandma’s molasses acquisition have been accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and, accordingly, the assets acquired, liabilities assumed and results of operations of the acquired businesses are included in our consolidated financial statements from the respective dates of acquisition.  The Ortega food service dispensing pouch and dipping cup and the Grandma’s molasses acquisitions and the application of the purchase method of accounting for these acquisitions affect comparability between periods presented in this report.

We are subject to a number of challenges that may adversely affect our businesses.  These challenges, which are discussed below and under the heading “Forward-Looking Statements,” include:

Fluctuations in Commodity Prices and Production and Distribution Costs.  We purchase raw materials, including agricultural products, meat, poultry, other raw materials and packaging materials from growers, commodity processors, other food companies and packaging manufacturers.  Raw materials are subject to fluctuations in price attributable to a number of factors.  Fluctuations in commodity prices can lead to retail price volatility and intensive price competition, and can influence consumer and trade buying patterns.  In the thirteen weeks ended September 30, 2006, our commodity prices for maple syrup and corn sweetners were higher than those incurred during the thirteen weeks ended October 1, 2005.  In addition, the cost of

14

labor, manufacturing, energy, fuel, packaging materials and other costs related to the production and distribution of our food products have risen in recent years, and we believe that certain of these costs may continue to rise in the foreseeable future.  We manage these risks by entering into short-term supply contracts and advance commodities purchase agreements from time to time, and if necessary, by raising prices.  We cannot assure you that any sales price increases by us will offset the increased cost of raw material commodities.

Consolidation in the Retail Trade and Consequent Inventory Reductions.  As the retail grocery trade continues to consolidate and our retail customers grow larger and become more sophisticated, our retail customers may demand lower pricing and increased promotional programs.  These customers are also reducing their inventories and increasing their emphasis on private label products. 

Changing Customer Preferences.  Consumers in the market categories in which we compete frequently change their taste preferences, dietary habits and product packaging preferences.

Consumer Concern Regarding Food Safety, Quality and Health.  The food industry is subject to consumer concerns regarding the safety and quality of certain food products, including the health implications of genetically modified organisms, obesity and trans fatty acids. 

Changing Valuations of the Canadian Dollar in Relation to the U.S. Dollar.  We purchase the majority of our maple syrup requirements from manufacturers located in Quebec, Canada.  Over the past year the U.S. dollar has weakened against the Canadian dollar, which has in turn increased our costs relating to the production of our maple syrup products.

To confront these challenges, we continue to take steps to build the value of our brands, to improve our existing portfolio of products with new product and marketing initiatives, to reduce costs through improved productivity and to address consumer concerns about food safety, quality and health.

Critical Accounting Policies; Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires our management to make a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Some of the more significant estimates and assumptions made by management involve trade and consumer promotion expenses, allowances for excess, obsolete and unsaleable inventories, the recoverability of goodwill, trademarks, customer relationship intangibles, property, plant and equipment, and deferred tax assets, and the accounting for our EISs, including their treatment in computing our income tax expense and the accounting for earnings per share.  Actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions.

Summaries of our significant accounting policies are described more fully in note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included in our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.  We believe the following critical accounting policies involve the most significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Trade and Consumer Promotion Expenses

We offer various sales incentive programs to customers and consumers, such as price discounts, in-store display incentives, slotting fees and coupons.  The recognition of expense for these programs involves the use of judgment related to performance and redemption estimates.  Estimates are made based on historical experience and other factors.  Actual expenses may differ if the level of redemption rates and performance vary from estimates.

15

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market.  Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out and average cost methods.  Inventories have been reduced by an allowance for excess, obsolete and unsaleable inventories.  The allowance is an estimate based on our management’s review of inventories on hand compared to estimated future usage and sales.

Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets, such as property, plant and equipment, and intangibles with estimated useful lives are depreciated or amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values, and reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.  Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset.  If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset.  Recoverability of assets held for sale is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset or asset group to their fair value less estimated cost to sell.  Calculating fair value of assets requires significant estimates and assumptions by management.

Goodwill and Trademarks

Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives (trademarks) are tested for impairment at least annually and whenever events or circumstances occur indicating that goodwill or indefinite life intangibles might be impaired.

We perform the annual impairment tests as of the last day of each fiscal year.  The annual goodwill impairment test involves a two-step process.  The first step of the impairment test involves comparing the fair value of our company with our company’s carrying value, including goodwill.  If the carrying value of our company exceeds our fair value, we perform the second step of the impairment test to determine the amount of the impairment loss.  The second step of the goodwill impairment test involves comparing the implied fair value of goodwill with the carrying value of that goodwill and recognizing a loss for the difference.  Calculating our fair value requires significant estimates and assumptions by management.  We estimate our fair value by applying third party market value indicators to our earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA).  We test indefinite life intangible assets for impairment by comparing their carrying value to their fair value that is determined using a cash flow method and recognize a loss to the extent the carrying value is greater.

We completed our annual impairment tests for the year ended December 31, 2005 with no adjustments to the carrying values of goodwill and indefinite life intangibles.  We did not note any events or circumstances during the thirteen week period ended September 30, 2006 that would indicate that goodwill or indefinite life intangibles might be impaired.

Accounting Treatment for EISs.

Our EISs include Class A common stock and senior subordinated notes.  Upon completion of our initial public offering (including the exercise of the over-allotment option), we allocated the proceeds from the issuance of the EISs, based upon relative fair value at the issuance date, to the Class A common stock and the senior subordinated notes.  We have assumed that the price paid in the EIS offering was equivalent to the combined fair value of the Class A common stock and the senior subordinated notes, and the price paid in the offering for the senior subordinated notes sold separately (not in the form of EISs) was equivalent to their initial stated principal amount.  We have concluded there are no embedded derivative features related to the EIS that require bifurcation under Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 133,

16

“Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” as amended (SFAS No. 133).  We have determined the fair value of the Class A common stock and the senior subordinated notes with reference to a number of factors, including the sale of the senior subordinated notes sold separately from the EISs that have the same terms as the senior subordinated notes included in the EISs.  Therefore, we have allocated the entire proceeds of the EIS offering to the Class A common stock and the senior subordinated notes, and the allocation of the EIS proceeds to the senior subordinated notes did not result in a premium or discount.

We have concluded that the call option and the change in control put option in the senior subordinated notes do not warrant separate accounting under SFAS No. 133 because they are clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the host debt instrument.  Therefore, we have allocated the entire proceeds of the offering to the Class A common stock and the senior subordinated notes.  Upon subsequent issuances, if any, of senior subordinated notes, we will evaluate whether the call option and the change in control put option in the senior subordinated notes require separate accounting under SFAS No. 133.  We expect that if there is a substantial discount or premium upon a subsequent issuance of senior subordinated notes, we may need to separately account for the call option and the change in control put option features as embedded derivatives for such subsequent issuance.  If we determine that the embedded derivatives, if any, require separate accounting from the debt host contract under SFAS No. 133, the call option and the change in control put option associated with the senior subordinated notes will be recorded as derivative liabilities at fair value, with changes in fair value recorded as other non-operating income or expense.  Any discount on the senior subordinated notes resulting from the allocation of proceeds to an embedded derivative will be amortized to interest expense over the remaining life of the senior subordinated notes.

The Class A common stock portion of each EIS is included in stockholders’ equity, net of the related portion of the EIS transaction costs allocated to Class A common stock.  Dividends paid on the Class A common stock are recorded as a decrease to additional paid-in capital when declared by us.  The senior subordinated note portion of each EIS is included in long-term debt, and the related portion of the EIS transaction costs allocated to the senior subordinated notes was capitalized as deferred financing costs and is being amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method.  Interest on the senior subordinated notes is charged to expense as accrued by us and deducted for income tax purposes.

Income Tax Expense Estimates and Policies

As part of the income tax provision process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate our income taxes.  This process involves estimating our current tax expenses together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes.  These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities.  We then assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and to the extent we believe the recovery is not likely, we establish a valuation allowance.  Further, to the extent that we establish a valuation allowance or increase this allowance in a financial accounting period, we include such charge in our tax provision, or reduce our tax benefits in our consolidated statement of operations.  We use our judgment to determine our provision or benefit for income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against our net deferred tax assets.

We have recorded deferred tax assets, a portion of which represents net operating loss carryforwards.  A valuation allowance has been recorded for certain state net operating loss carryforwards.

There are various factors that may cause these tax assumptions to change in the near term, and we may have to record a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets.  We cannot predict whether future U.S. federal and state income tax laws and regulations might be passed that could have a material effect on our results of operations.  We assess the impact of significant changes to the U.S. federal and state income tax laws and regulations on a regular basis and update the assumptions and estimates used to prepare our consolidated financial statements when new regulations and legislation are enacted.

17

We do not provide for U.S. federal income taxes or tax benefits on the unremitted earnings or losses of our foreign subsidiary as such earnings are intended to be indefinitely reinvested.

We have accounted for our issuance of EISs as an issuance of the separate securities evidenced by such EISs and have allocated the proceeds received for each EIS between the Class A common stock and senior subordinated note represented thereby in the amounts of their respective fair values at the time of issuance.  Accordingly, we have accounted for the senior subordinated notes represented by the EISs as long-term debt bearing a stated interest rate and maturing on October 30, 2016.  In connection with the issuance and initial public offering of the EISs, we received an opinion from counsel that the senior subordinated notes should be treated as debt for United States federal income tax purposes.  We continue to be of the view that the senior subordinated notes should be treated as debt for United States federal income tax purposes (although we have not sought a ruling from the IRS on this issue), and we intend to deduct annually interest expense of approximately $19.9 million on the senior subordinated notes from taxable income for United States federal and state income tax purposes.  There can be no assurance that the classification of senior subordinated notes as debt (or the amount of interest expense deducted) will not be challenged by the IRS or other tax jurisdictions or will be sustained by a court of law if challenged.

If our treatment of the senior subordinated notes as debt is put at risk in the future as a result of a future ruling by the IRS or other tax jurisdiction or by a court of law, including an adverse ruling for EISs (or other similar securities) issued by other companies or as a result of a proposed adjustment by the IRS or other tax jurisdiction in an examination of our company or for any other reason, we will need to consider the effect of such developments on the determination of our future tax provisions and obligations.  In the event the senior subordinated notes are required to be treated as equity for income tax purposes, then the cumulative interest expense associated with the senior subordinated notes for prior tax periods that are open to assessment and for future tax periods would not be deductible from taxable income and we would be required to recognize additional tax expense and establish a related income tax liability for prior period treatment.  The additional tax due to the federal and state authorities would be based on our taxable income or loss for each of the years that we claimed the interest expense deduction and would materially and adversely affect our financial position, cash flow, and liquidity, and could affect our ongoing ability to make interest payments on the senior subordinated notes and dividend payments on the shares of common stock represented by the EISs and our ability to continue as a going concern.  In addition, non-U.S. holders of our EISs could be subject to withholding taxes on the payment of interest treated as dividends on equity, which could subject us to additional liability for the withholding taxes that we do not collect on such payments.  However, consistent with the opinion of counsel we received on the date of our initial public offering and our continued belief that the senior subordinated notes should be treated as debt for United States federal income tax purposes, we do not record a liability for a potential disallowance of this interest expense deduction or for the potential imposition of these withholding taxes.

A factor in the ongoing determination that no liability should be recorded in our consolidated financial statements with respect to the deductibility for income tax purposes of the interest on the senior subordinated notes is the veracity, at the time of the initial public offering, of the representations delivered by the purchasers of senior subordinated notes sold separately (not in the form of EISs).  In addition, other factors indicating the existence, at the time of the initial public offering, of any plan or pre-arrangement may also be relevant to this ongoing determination.  It is possible that we will at some point in the future, as a result of IRS interpretations or other changes in circumstances, conclude that we should establish a reserve for tax liabilities associated with a disallowance of all or part of the interest deductions on the senior subordinated notes, although our present view is that no such reserve is necessary or appropriate.  If we decide to maintain such a reserve, our income tax provision, and related income tax payable, would be materially impacted.  As a result, our ability to pay dividends on the shares of our common stock could be materially impaired and the market price and/or liquidity for the EISs or our common stock could be adversely affected.

18

Earnings Per Share

We have two classes of common stock, designated as Class A common stock and Class B common stock, and we present basic and diluted earnings per share using the two-class method.  The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for each class of common stock according to dividends declared and participation rights in undistributed earnings.

Net income available to our common stockholders is allocated between our two classes of common stock based upon the two-class method.  Basic and diluted earnings per share for our Class A and Class B common stock is calculated by dividing allocated net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of Class A and Class B common stock outstanding.

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth the percentages of net sales represented by selected items for the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods ended September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005 reflected in our consolidated statements of operations.  The comparisons of financial results are not necessarily indicative of future results.

	Thirteen Weeks Ended				Thirty-nine Weeks Ended
	September 30, 2006		October 1, 2005		September 30, 2006		October 1, 2005
Statement of Operations:
Net sales	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%
Cost of goods sold	71.2	%	69.8	%	71.5	%	70.5	%
Cost of goods sold—restructuring charge	0.0	%	0.3	%	0.0	%	1.3	%
Gross profit	28.8	%	29.8	%	28.5	%	28.2	%
Sales, marketing and distribution expenses	11.3	%	11.2	%	11.2	%	11.3	%
General and administrative expenses	1.6	%	1.8	%	1.7	%	1.8	%
Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment	(0.5	)%	0.0	%	0.0	%	0.0	%
Amortization expense — customer relationships	0.2	%	0.0	%	0.2	%	0.0	%
Operating income	16.3	%	16.8	%	15.7	%	15.1	%
Interest expense, net	10.8	%	11.3	%	10.9	%	11.3	%
Income before income tax expense	5.5	%	5.4	%	4.7	%	3.8	%
Income tax expense	2.1	%	2.1	%	1.8	%	1.5	%
Net income	3.4	%	3.3	%	2.9	%	2.3	%

As used in this section the terms listed below have the following meanings:

Net Sales.  Our net sales represents gross sales of products shipped to customers plus amounts charged customers for shipping and handling, less cash discounts, coupon redemptions, slotting fees and trade promotional spending.

Gross Profit.  Our gross profit is equal to our net sales less cost of goods sold.  The primary components of our cost of goods sold are cost of internally manufactured products, purchases of finished goods from co-packers plus freight costs to our distribution centers and to our customers.

19

Sales, Marketing and Distribution Expenses.  Our sales, marketing and distribution expenses include costs for marketing personnel, consumer advertising programs, internal sales forces, brokerage costs and warehouse facilities.

General and Administrative Expenses.  Our general and administrative expenses include administrative employee compensation and benefit costs, as well as information technology infrastructure and communication costs, office rent and supplies, professional services, and other general corporate expenses.

Gain on Sale of Property, Plant and Equipment.  Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment includes any gain or loss on the sale of property, plant and equipment.

Amortization Expenses—Customer Relationships.  Amortization expense—customer relationships includes the amortization expense associated with customer relationship intangibles and are amortized over their useful lives of 20 years.

Net Interest Expense.  Net interest expense includes interest relating to our outstanding indebtedness and amortization of deferred debt issuance costs, net of interest income.

Thirteen-week period ended September 30, 2006 compared to thirteen-week period ended October 1, 2005.

Net Sales.  Net sales increased $9.5 million or 10.3% to $101.8 million for the thirteen-week period ended September 30, 2006 from $92.3 million for the thirteen-week period ended October 1, 2005.  The Ortega food service dispensing pouch and dipping cup acquisition accounted for $3.2 million of the net sales increase, the Grandma’s molasses acquisition accounted for $2.5 million of the net sales increase and a temporary co-packing arrangement that is expected to remain in place for approximately three additional months accounted for $1.1 million of the net sales increase.  The remaining $2.7 million increase in net sales was related to increases in sales price and unit volume.  Net sales of our lines of Maple Grove Farms, B&M, Ortega (exclusive of food service dispensing pouch and dipping cup net sales), Las Palmas, and Ac’cent products increased in the amounts of $1.7 million, $0.8 million, $0.6 million, $0.5 million and $0.4 million or 12.3%, 19.0%, 3.1%, 9.4% and 12.4%, respectively.  These increases were offset by a reduction of net sales in Emeril’s and Polaner products of $1.0 million and $0.7 million or 18.0% and 7.4%, respectively.  All other brands increased, in the aggregate, by $0.4 million or 1.2%.

Gross Profit.  Gross profit increased $1.8 million or 6.6% to $29.3 million for the thirteen-week period ended September 30, 2006 from $27.5 million for the thirteen-week period ended October 1, 2005.  On July 1, 2005, we closed our New Iberia, Louisiana, manufacturing facility as part of our ongoing efforts to improve our production capacity utilization, productivity and operating efficiencies, and lower our overall costs.  We recorded as cost of goods sold a restructuring charge associated with the plant closing, which included a cash charge for employee compensation and other costs of $0.8 million and a non-cash charge for the impairment of property, plant, equipment and inventory of $3.0 million.  In the thirteen-weeks ended October 1, 2005, we expensed $0.3 million of this $3.8 million charge.  No restructuring charges were recorded or expensed during the thirteen weeks ended September 30, 2006.

Pro forma gross profit, which excludes the restructuring charge described above, increased $1.5 million or 5.4% to $29.3 million for the thirteen-week period ended September 30, 2006 from $27.8 million for the thirteen-week period ended October 1, 2005.  Pro forma gross profit expressed as a percentage of net sales decreased 1.4% to 28.8% in the thirteen-week period ended September 30, 2006 from 30.2% in the thirteen-week period ended October 1, 2005.  The decrease in pro forma gross profit expressed as a percentage of net sales was primarily due to higher costs for packaging materials, transportation, maple syrup and corn sweeteners during the thirteen-week period ended September 30, 2006, which were partially offset by sales price increases and a shift in the sales mix to higher margin products.

20

Sales, Marketing and Distribution Expenses.  Sales, marketing and distribution expenses increased $1.1 million or 10.6% to $11.5 million for the thirteen-week period ended September 30, 2006 from $10.4 million for the thirteen-week period ended October 1, 2005.  These expenses as a percentage of net sales increased to 11.3% for the thirteen-week period ended September 30, 2006 from 11.2% for the thirteen-week period ended October 1, 2005.  The increase is primarily due to an increase of $0.8 million in consumer marketing and $0.3 million in brokerage and salesmen commissions relating to the increased sales volume.

General and Administrative Expenses.  General and administrative expenses decreased $0.1 million or 6.1% to $1.6 million for the thirteen-week period ended September 30, 2006 from $1.7 million in the thirteen-week period ended October 1, 2005.  The decrease was primarily due to a reduction in professional fees, partially offset by an increase in accrued incentive compensation.

Gain on Sale of Property, Plant and Equipment.  Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment for the thirteen-week period ended September 30, 2006 relates to the gain on the sale of our New Iberia facility of $0.5 million.  There were no gains or losses on the sale of property, plant and equipment for the thirteen-week period ended October 1, 2005.

Amortization Expense—Customer Relationships.  Amortization expense—customer relationships, all of which relates to the amortization of customer relationship intangibles acquired in the Grandma’s molasses acquisition, was $0.2 million for the thirteen-week period ended September 30, 2006.  We had no amortization expense of customer relationship intangibles in the thirteen-week period ended October 1, 2005.

Operating Income.  As a result of the foregoing, operating income increased $1.1 million or 7.4% to $16.6 million for the thirteen-week period ended September 30, 2006 from $15.5 million for the thirteen-week period ended October 1, 2005.  Operating income expressed as a percentage of net sales decreased to 16.3% in the thirteen-week period ended September 30, 2006 from 16.8% in the thirteen-week period ended October 1, 2005.  Operating income for the thirteen-week period ended October 1, 2005 was negatively impacted by $0.3 million as a result of the restructuring charge described above.  Operating income for the thirteen-week period ended September 30, 2006 was positively impacted by $0.5 million as a result of the gain on sale of our New Iberia facility.

Interest Expense.  Net interest expense increased $0.5 million or 5.3% to $11.0 million for the thirteen-week period ended September 30, 2006 from $10.5 million in the thirteen-week period ended October 1, 2005.  The average debt outstanding increased approximately $25.0 million in the thirteen-week period ended September 30, 2006 as compared to the thirteen-week period ended October 1, 2005 as a result of the term loan used to finance the Grandma’s molasses acquisition.  See “—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Debt” below.

Income Tax Expense.  Income tax expense increased $0.2 million to $2.2 million for the thirteen-week period ended September 30, 2006 from $2.0 million for the thirteen-week periods ended October 1, 2005.  Our effective tax rate was 38.8% for the thirteen-week period ended September 30, 2006 and 39.1% for the thirteen-week period ended October 1, 2005.

Thirty-nine Week period ended September 30, 2006 compared to Thirty-nine Week period ended October 1, 2005.

Net Sales.  Net sales increased $23.6 million or 8.5% to $300.1 million for the thirty-nine week period ended September 30, 2006 from $276.5 million for the thirty-nine week period ended October 1, 2005.  The Ortega food service dispensing pouch and dipping cup acquisition accounted for $9.4 million of the net sales increase, the Grandma’s molasses acquisition accounted for $4.8 million of the net sales increase and a temporary co-packing arrangement that is expected to remain in place for approximately three additional months accounted for $3.2 million of the net sales increase.  The remaining $6.2 million increase in net sales was related to increases in sales price and unit volume.  Net sales of our lines of Ortega (exclusive of food

21

service dispensing pouch and dipping cup net sales), Maple Grove Farms, B&M, Las Palmas, Underwood and Vermont Maid products increased in the amounts of $4.6 million, $2.1 million, $1.3 million, $1.0 million, $0.7 million and $0.3 million, or 7.9%, 5.3%, 7.2%, 6.2%, 4.1% and 17.4%, respectively.  These increases were offset by a reduction of net sales in Emeril’s, Polaner and B&G pickle and pepper products of $3.0 million, $0.7 and $0.7 million or 16.3%, 2.4%, and 2.0%, respectively.  All other brands increased, in the aggregate, by $0.6 million or 1.3%.

Gross Profit.  Gross profit increased $7.6 million or 9.8% to $85.6 million for the thirty-nine week period ended September 30, 2006 from $78.0 million for the thirty-nine week period ended October 1, 2005.  On July 1, 2005, we closed our New Iberia, Louisiana, manufacturing facility as part of our ongoing efforts to improve our production capacity utilization, productivity and operating efficiencies, and lower our overall costs.  We recorded as cost of goods sold a restructuring charge associated with the plant closing, which included a cash charge for employee compensation and other costs of $0.8 million and a non-cash charge for the impairment of property, plant, equipment and inventory of $3.0 million.  In the thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2005, we expensed $3.5 million of this $3.8 million charge.  No restructuring charges were recorded or expensed during the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006.

Pro forma gross profit, which excludes the restructuring charge described above, increased $4.1 million or 5.0% to $85.6 million for the thirty-nine week period ended September 30, 2006 from $81.5 million for the thirty-nine week period ended October 1, 2005.  Pro forma gross profit expressed as a percentage of net sales decreased 1.0% to 28.5% in the thirty-nine week period ended September 30, 2006 from 29.5% in the thirty-nine week period ended October 1, 2005.  The decrease in pro forma gross profit expressed as a percentage of net sales was primarily due to higher costs for packaging materials, transportation, maple syrup and corn sweeteners during the thirty-nine week period ended September 30, 2006, which were partially offset by sales price increases.

Sales, Marketing and Distribution Expenses.  Sales, marketing and distribution expenses increased $2.3 million or 7.4% to $33.5 million for the thirty-nine week period ended September 30, 2006 from $31.2 million for the thirty-nine week period ended October 1, 2005.  These expenses as a percentage of net sales decreased to 11.2% for the thirty-nine week period ended September 30, 2006 from 11.3% for the thirty-nine week period ended October 1, 2005.  The increase is primarily due to an increase in consumer marketing of $1.3 million and brokerage and salesmen commissions of $1.1 million relating to the increased sales volume.  All other expenses decreased $0.1 million.

General and Administrative Expenses.  General and administrative expenses increased $0.1 million or 0.6% to $5.1 million for the thirty-nine week period ended September 30, 2006 from $5.0 million in the thirty-nine week period ended October 1, 2005.  The increase was primarily due to an increase in accrued incentive compensation, partially offset by a reduction in professional fees.

Gain on Sale of Property, Plant and Equipment.  Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment for the thirty-nine week period ended September 30, 2006 related to the gain on the sale of our New Iberia facility of $0.5 million.  There were no gains or losses on the sale of property, plant and equipment for the thirty-nine week period ended October 1, 2005.

Amortization Expense—Customer Relationships.  Amortization expense—customer relationships, all of which relates to the amortization of customer relationship intangibles acquired in the Grandma’s molasses acquisition, was $0.5 million for the thirty-nine week period ended September 30, 2006.  We had no amortization expense of customer relationship intangibles in the thirty-nine week period ended October 1, 2005.

Operating Income.  As a result of the foregoing, operating income increased $5.3 million or 12.6% to $47.0 million for the thirty-nine week period ended September 30, 2006 from $41.7 million for the thirty-nine week period ended October 1, 2005.  Operating income expressed as a percentage of net sales increased to

22

15.7% in the thirty-nine week period ended September 30, 2006 from 15.1% in the thirty-nine week period ended October 1, 2005.  Operating income for the thirty-nine week period ended October 1, 2005 was negatively impacted by $3.5 million as a result of the restructuring charge described above.  Operating income for the thirty-nine week period ended September 30, 2006 was positively impacted by $0.5 million as a result of the gain on sale of our New Iberia facility.

Interest Expense.  Net interest expense increased $1.5 million or 4.7% to $32.8 million for the thirty-nine week period ended September 30, 2006 from $31.3 million in the thirty-nine week period ended October 1, 2005.  The average debt outstanding increased approximately $25.0 million in the thirty-nine week period ended September 30, 2006 as compared to the thirty-nine week period ended October 1, 2005 as a result of the term loan used to finance the Grandma’s molasses acquisition.  See “—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Debt” below.

Income Tax Expense.  Income tax expense increased $1.4 million or 35.3% to $5.5 million for the thirty-nine week period ended September 30, 2006 from $4.1 million for the thirty-nine week period ended October 1, 2005.  Our effective tax rate was 38.8% for the thirty-nine week period ended September 30, 2006 and 39.1% for the thirty-nine week period ended October 1, 2005.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our primary liquidity requirements include debt service, capital expenditures, working capital needs and financing for acquisitions.  See also, “Dividend Policy” and “Commitments and Contractual Obligations” below.  We fund our liquidity needs primarily through cash generated from operations and to the extent necessary, through borrowings under our revolving credit facility.

Cash Flows.  Cash provided by operating activities increased $6.7 million to $18.2 million for the thirty-nine week period ended September 30, 2006 from $11.5 million in the thirty-nine week period ended October 1, 2005.  The increase was due to an increase in net income of $2.4 million, and changes relating to a reduction in the change in inventory and an increase in accrued expenses, offset by a reduction in accounts payable.  Working capital at September 30, 2006 was $101.3 million, a decrease of $2.5 million from working capital at December 31, 2005 of $103.8 million.

Net cash used in investing activities for the thirty-nine week period ended September 30, 2006 was $34.6 million as compared to $5.0 million for the thirty-nine week period ended October 1, 2005.  Capital expenditures during the thirty-nine week period ended September 30, 2006 were $5.8 million and included purchases of manufacturing and computer equipment.  This compares to $5.0 million in similar capital expenditures for the thirty-nine week period ended October 1, 2005.  Investment activities for the thirty-nine week period ended September 30, 2006 included $30.1 million for the Grandma’s molasses acquisition.  Net proceeds from the sale of property was $1.3 million for the thirty-nine week period ended September 30, 2006.

Net cash provided by financing activities for the thirty-nine week period ended September 30, 2006 was $11.9 million as compared to net cash used in financing activities of $12.2 million for the thirty-nine week period ended October 1, 2005.  Net cash provided by financing activities for the thirty-nine week period ended September 30, 2006 consists of $25.0 million in a new term loan, offset by $12.7 million in dividends paid on our Class A common stock, and $0.4 million in debt issuance costs.  The net cash used in financing activities for the thirty-nine week period ended October 1, 2005 consists of $12.2 million in dividends paid on our Class A common stock.

Based on a number of factors, including our trademark and goodwill amortization for tax purposes from our prior acquisitions, and the income tax effects of our initial public offering, the concurrent offerings and related transactions, including our call premium on our outstanding senior subordinated notes, other write-offs of existing deferred financing costs and the compensation expense associated with our repurchase of certain management stock options, we realized a significant reduction in cash taxes in 2005 as compared to our

23

tax expense for financial statement purposes, and further, we will realize a benefit to our cash taxes payable from amortization of our trademarks and goodwill for the taxable years 2006 through 2020.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Certain disclosures in this report include “non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) financial measures.”  A non-GAAP financial measure is defined as a numerical measure of our financial performance that excludes or includes amounts so as to be different than the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP in our consolidated balance sheets and related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows.  We present EBITDA (net income before net interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization) and adjusted EBITDA (EBITDA as adjusted for restructuring charges incurred in fiscal 2005) because we believe they are useful indicators of our historical debt capacity and ability to service debt.  We also present this discussion of EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA because covenants in the indenture governing our senior notes, our credit facility and the indenture governing our senior subordinated notes contain ratios based on these measures.

A reconciliation of EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA with the most directly comparable GAAP measure is included below for the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005 along with the components of EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA.

Reconciliation of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities (dollars in thousands).

	Thirteen Weeks Ended						Thirty-nine Weeks Ended
	September 30, 2006			October 1, 2005			September 30, 2006			October 1, 2005
Net income	$	3,443		$	3,060		$	8,704		$	6,354
Income tax expense	2,183			1,965			5,518			4,080
Interest expense, net	11,009			10,458			32,796			31,320
Depreciation and amortization	1,959			1,769			5,863			5,129
EBITDA (1)	18,594			17,252			52,881			46,883
Adjustments to EBITDA – restructuring (1)(2)	—			300			—			3,544
Adjusted EBITDA (1)	18,594			17,552			52,881			50,427
Income tax expense	(2,183		)	(1,965		)	(5,518		)	(4,080		)
Interest expense, net	(11,009		)	(10,458		)	(32,796		)	(31,320		)
Deferred income taxes	2,116			2,363			4,910			4,647
Restructuring charge—cash portion	—			(162		)	—			(593		)
Amortization of deferred financing costs	710			698			2,122			2,094
Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment	(525		)	—			(525		)	—
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of business combination	(3,571		)	(1,758		)	(2,898		)	(9,649		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	4,132		$	6,270		$	18,176		$	11,526

(1)We define EBITDA as net income before net interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization.  We define adjusted EBITDA as EBITDA as adjusted for restructuring charges incurred in fiscal 2005.  We believe that the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA is net cash provided by operating activities.  We present EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA because we believe they are useful indicators of our historical debt capacity and ability to service debt.  We also present this discussion of EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA because covenants in our credit facility and the indentures governing the senior notes and the senior subordinated notes contain ratios based on these measures.

24

EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA are not substitutes for operating income or net income, as determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.  EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA are not complete net cash flow measures because EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA are measures of liquidity that do not include reductions for cash payments for an entity’s obligation to service its debt, fund its working capital, capital expenditures and acquisitions, if any, and pay its income taxes and dividends, if any, and in the case of adjusted EBITDA, the cost to restructure our operations.  Rather, EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA are two potential indicators of an entity’s ability to fund these cash requirements.  EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA also are not complete measures of an entity’s profitability because they do not include costs and expenses for depreciation and amortization, interest and related expenses and income taxes and in the case of adjusted EBITDA, the cost of restructuring charges.  EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA, as we define them, may differ from similarly named measures used by other entities.

(2)On July 1, 2005, we closed our New Iberia, Louisiana, manufacturing facility as part of our ongoing efforts to improve our production capacity utilization, productivity, and operating efficiencies and lower our overall costs.  In fiscal 2005, we recorded a charge of $3.8 million, of which $0.3 million and $3.5 million was recorded during the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2005.  The charge associated with the plant closing included a cash charge for employee compensation and other costs of $0.8 million and a non-cash charge for the impairment of property, plant, equipment and inventory of $3.0 million.

Dividend Policy

Prior to the completion of our initial public offering, our board of directors adopted a dividend policy that reflects a basic judgment that our stockholders would be better served if we distributed our cash available to pay dividends to them instead of retaining it in our business.  Under this policy, cash generated by our company in excess of operating needs, interest and principal payments on indebtedness, capital expenditures sufficient to maintain our properties and other assets and $6.0 million of dividend restricted cash (that can be used for the payment of dividends on Class A common stock or for any other purpose other than the payment of dividends on the Class B common stock) would in general be distributed as regular quarterly cash dividends (up to the intended dividend rate as determined by our board of directors) to the holders of our Class A common stock and as regular annual cash dividends (up to the dividend rate permitted under our debt agreements and our organizational documents) to the holders of our Class B common stock and not be retained by us.

Dividend payments, however, are not mandatory or guaranteed and holders of our common stock do not have any legal right to receive, or require us to pay, dividends.  Furthermore, our board of directors may, in its sole discretion, amend or repeal this dividend policy with respect to the Class A and Class B common stock at any time.  Our board of directors may decrease the level of dividends for the Class A and Class B common stock below the intended dividend rates or discontinue entirely the payment of dividends.  Future dividends with respect to shares of our capital stock, if any, depend on, among other things, our results of operations, cash requirements, financial condition, contractual restrictions, business opportunities, provisions of applicable law and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant.  The indenture governing our senior subordinated notes, the terms of our revolving credit facility and the indenture governing the senior notes contain significant restrictions on our ability to make dividend payments.  In addition, certain provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law may limit our ability to pay dividends.

As a result of our dividend policy, we may not retain a sufficient amount of cash to finance growth opportunities or unanticipated capital expenditure needs or to fund our operations in the event of a significant business downturn.  We may have to forego growth opportunities or capital expenditures that would otherwise be necessary or desirable if we do not find alternative sources of financing.  If we do not have sufficient cash for these purposes, our financial condition and our business will suffer.

For the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006, we had cash flows provided by operating activities of $18.2 million.  If our cash flows from operating activities for future periods were to fall below our minimum expectations (or if our assumptions as to capital expenditures or interest expense were too low or our

25

assumptions as to the sufficiency of our revolving credit facility to finance our working capital needs were to prove incorrect), we would need either to reduce or eliminate dividends or, to the extent permitted under the indenture governing our senior notes, the indenture governing our senior subordinated notes and the terms of our credit facility, fund a portion of our dividends with borrowings or from other sources.  If we were to use working capital or permanent borrowings to fund dividends, we would have less cash and/or borrowing capacity available for future dividends and other purposes, which could negatively impact our financial position, our results of operations, our liquidity and our ability to maintain or expand our business.

The table below illustrates for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 and the latest twelve months ended September 30, 2006, respectively, the amount of cash that we had available for distribution to our stockholders.

Cash Available to Pay Dividends	Fiscal Year  Ended December 31, 2005			Less: Thirty-nine Weeks Ended October 1, 2005			Plus: Thirty-nine Weeks Ended September 30, 2006			Latest Twelve Months Ended September 30, 2006 (a)
	(unaudited)			(unaudited)			(unaudited)			(unaudited)
	(Dollars in thousands)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	22,523		$	11,526		$	18,176		$	29,173
Interest expense, net	41,767			31,320			32,796			43,243
Income taxes	5,235			4,080			5,518			6,673
Amortization of deferred debt issuance costs	(2,791		)	(2,094		)	(2,122		)	(2,819		)
Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment	—			—			525			525
Deferred income taxes	(4,795		)	(4,647		)	(4,910		)	(5,058		)
Restructuring charge—property, plant, equipment and inventory impairment(b)	(3,070		)	(2,951		)	—			(119		)
Changes in assets and liabilities	3,050			9,649			2,898			(3,701		)
EBITDA	61,919			46,883			52,881			67,917
Restructuring charge (b)	3,839			3,544			—			295
Adjusted EBITDA	65,758			50,427			52,881			68,212
Reduction for cash income tax expense (c)	—			—			—			—
Cash interest expense (d)	(38,976		)	(29,226		)	(30,674		)	(40,424		)
Capital expenditures	(6,659		)	(4,992		)	(5,788		)	(7,455		)
Restructuring charge—cash portion (b)	(769		)	(593		)	—			(176		)
Cash available to pay dividends on Class A common stock	19,354			15,616			16,419			20,157
Less:
Dividends paid on Class A common stock	16,448			12,208			12,720			16,960
Dividend restricted cash (e)	6,000									6,000
Cash available (deficit) to pay dividends on Class B common stock	$	(3,094	)							$	(2,803	)

(a)Our unaudited consolidated statements of operations and cash flow data for the latest twelve months ended September 30, 2006 was derived from our audited consolidated statements of operations and cash flow data for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 and (i) subtracting from it our unaudited consolidated statements of operations and cash flow data for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2005 and (ii) adding to it our unaudited consolidated statements of operations and cash flow data for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006.

(b)On July 1, 2005, we closed our New Iberia, Louisiana manufacturing facility as part of our ongoing efforts to improve our production capacity utilization, productivity, and operating efficiencies and lower our overall costs.  In fiscal 2005, we recorded a charge of $3.8 million, of which $3.5 million was recorded during the thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2005.  The charge associated with the plant closing included a cash charge for employee compensation and other costs of $0.8 million and a non-cash charge for the impairment of property, plant, equipment and inventory of $3.0 million.

(c)In fiscal 2005 we had a net cash tax refund of $5.9 million.  For the latest twelve months ended September 30, 2006 we had a net cash tax refund of $6.4 million.

(d)Cash interest expense is net interest expense less amortization of deferred debt issuance costs.

(e)Under our organizational documents, our EBITDA otherwise available for the payment of annual dividends, if any, on our Class B common stock for any year is reduced by $6.0 million.

26

There can be no assurance that we will continue to pay dividends at historical levels, or at all.  Dividend payments are not mandatory or guaranteed, are within the absolute discretion of our board of directors and will be dependent upon many factors and future developments that could differ materially from our current expectations.  Over time, our EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA and capital expenditure, working capital and other cash needs will be subject to uncertainties, which could impact the level of dividends, if any, we pay in the future.

Acquisitions

Our liquidity and capital resources have been significantly impacted by acquisitions and may be impacted in the foreseeable future by additional acquisitions.  We have historically financed acquisitions with borrowings and cash flows from operating activities.  Our interest expense has increased as a result of additional indebtedness we have incurred as a result of our acquisition of Ortega in August 2003 and the Grandma’s molasses business in January 2006, and will increase with any additional indebtedness we may incur to finance potential future acquisitions, if any.  To the extent future acquisitions, if any, are financed by additional indebtedness, the resulting increase in debt and interest expense could have a negative impact on liquidity.

Environmental and Health and Safety Costs

We have not made any material expenditures during the thirty-nine week period ended September 30, 2006 in order to comply with environmental laws or regulations.  Based on our experience to date, we believe that the future cost of compliance with existing environmental laws and regulations (and liability for known environmental conditions) will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.  However, we cannot predict what environmental or health and safety legislation or regulations will be enacted in the future or how existing or future laws or regulations will be enforced, administered or interpreted, nor can we predict the amount of future expenditures that may be required in order to comply with such environmental or health and safety laws or regulations or to respond to such environmental claims.

Debt

Senior Secured Credit Facility.  Concurrent with our initial public offering and concurrent offerings, we entered into a $30.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility on October 14, 2004.  In order to finance our acquisition of the Grandma’s molasses brand, we amended the credit facility in January 2006 to provide for, among other things, a new $25.0 million term loan and a reduction in the revolving credit facility commitments from $30.0 million to $25.0 million.  As amended, all outstanding indebtedness under the credit facility matures on January 10, 2011.  Interest under the revolving credit facility, including any outstanding letters of credit, is determined based on several alternative rates as stipulated in the revolving credit facility, including the base lending rate per annum plus an applicable margin, or LIBOR plus an applicable margin.  We pay a commitment fee of 0.50% per annum on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility.  Interest under the term loan is determined based on alternative rates as stipulated in the credit facility, including the base lending rate per annum plus an applicable margin of 1.75%, and LIBOR plus an applicable margin of 2.75%.  As of September 30, 2006, the interest rate for the term loan was 8.36% (based upon a six-month LIBOR contract that expires on January 17, 2007).  Our obligations under the credit facility are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior basis by all of our existing and future domestic subsidiaries.  The credit facility is secured by substantially all of our and our subsidiaries’ assets except our and our subsidiaries’ real property.  The credit facility provides for mandatory prepayment based on asset dispositions and certain issuances of securities, as defined.  The credit facility contains covenants that restrict, among other things, our ability to incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends and create certain liens.  The credit facility also contains certain financial maintenance covenants, which, among other things, specify maximum capital expenditure limits, a minimum interest coverage ratio and a maximum senior and total leverage ratio, each ratio as defined.  Proceeds of the revolving credit facility are restricted to funding our working capital requirements, capital

27

expenditures and acquisitions of companies in the same line of business as our company, subject to specified criteria.  The revolving credit facility was undrawn on the date of consummation of our initial public offering and concurrent offerings and remained undrawn through September 30, 2006.  The available borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facility, net of outstanding letters of credit of $2.9 million, was $22.1 million at September 30, 2006.  The maximum letter of credit capacity under the revolving credit facility is $10.0 million, with a fronting fee of 3% per annum for all outstanding letters of credit.

12.0% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2016.  In connection with our initial public offering, we issued on October 14, 2004, $124.3 million aggregate principal amount of 12.0% senior subordinated notes due 2016 in the form of EISs and an additional $22.8 million aggregate principal amount of 12.0% senior subordinated notes due 2016 (not in the form of EISs).  In connection with the exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option, on October 22, 2004 we issued an additional $18.7 million aggregate principal amount of 12.0% senior subordinated notes in the form of EISs.  Each EIS represents one share of our Class A common stock and $7.15 principal amount of our 12.0% senior subordinated notes.  As of September 30, 2006, $165.8 million aggregate principal amount of senior subordinated notes were outstanding.

Interest on the senior subordinated notes is payable quarterly in arrears on each January 30, April 30, July 30 and October 30 through the maturity date.  The senior subordinated notes will mature on October 30, 2016, unless earlier retired or redeemed at our option as described below.

Upon the occurrence of a change of control (as defined in the indenture), unless we have retired the senior subordinated notes or exercised our right to redeem all senior subordinated notes as described below, each holder of the senior subordinated notes has the right to require us to repurchase that holder’s senior subordinated notes at a price equal to 101.0% of the principal amount of the senior subordinated notes being repurchased, plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase.  In order to exercise this right, a holder must separate the senior subordinated notes and Class A common stock represented by such holder’s EISs.

We may not redeem the notes prior to October 30, 2009.  However, we may, from time to time, seek to retire the senior subordinated notes through cash repurchases of EISs or separate senior subordinated notes and/or exchanges of EISs or separate senior subordinated notes for equity securities, in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise.  Such repurchases or exchanges, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors.  We expect that any repurchase of EISs or senior subordinated notes would be funded with our existing cash balances and cash from operations. The amounts involved may be material.

In addition, on and after October 30, 2009, we may redeem for cash all or part of the senior subordinated notes upon not less than 30 or more than 60 days’ notice by mail to the owners of senior subordinated notes, at a redemption price of 106.0% beginning October 30, 2009 and thereafter at prices declining annually to 100% on or after October 30, 2012.  If we redeem any senior subordinated notes, the senior subordinated notes and Class A common stock represented by each EIS will be automatically separated.

The senior subordinated notes are unsecured obligations and are subordinated in right of payment to all of our existing and future senior secured and senior unsecured indebtedness, including the indebtedness under our credit facility and our senior notes.  The senior subordinated notes rank pari passu in right of payment with any of our other subordinated indebtedness.

The senior subordinated notes are jointly and severally and fully and unconditionally guaranteed by all of our existing domestic subsidiaries and certain future domestic subsidiaries on an unsecured and subordinated basis on the terms set forth in the indenture governing the senior subordinated notes.  The senior subordinated note guarantees are subordinated in right of payment to all existing and future senior indebtedness of the guarantors, including the indebtedness under our credit facility and the senior notes.

28

Our present foreign subsidiary, Les Produits Alimentaires Jacques et Fils Inc., is not a guarantor, and any future foreign or partially owned domestic subsidiaries will not be guarantors, of our senior subordinated notes.

The indenture governing the senior subordinated notes contains covenants with respect to us and restricts the incurrence of additional indebtedness and the issuance of capital stock; the payment of dividends or distributions on, and redemption of, capital stock; a number of other restricted payments, including certain investments; specified creation of liens, sale-leaseback transactions and sales of assets; fundamental changes, including consolidation, mergers and transfers of all or substantially all of our assets; and specified transactions with affiliates.

Although we believe that the senior subordinated notes should be treated as debt for U.S. federal income tax purposes in accordance with the opinion of our tax counsel issued on the date of our initial public offering, this conclusion cannot be assured.  If all or a portion of the senior subordinated notes were treated as equity rather than debt for U.S. federal income tax purposes, then a corresponding portion of the interest on the senior subordinated notes would not be deductible by us for U.S. federal income tax purposes.  In addition, we would be subject to liability for U.S. withholding taxes on interest payments to non-U.S. holders if such payments were determined to be dividends. Our inability to deduct interest on the senior subordinated notes could materially increase our taxable income and, thus, our U.S. federal and applicable state income tax liability. Our liability for income taxes (and withholding taxes) if the senior subordinated notes were determined to be equity for income tax purposes would materially reduce our after-tax cash flow and would materially and adversely impact our ability to make interest and/or dividend payments and could impact our ability to continue as a going concern.  See “Critical Accounting Policies; Use of Estimates—Income Tax Expense Estimates and Policies” for further discussion of income tax matters relating to our senior subordinated notes.

8.0% Senior Notes due 2011.  Concurrently with our initial public offering and offering of separate senior subordinated notes, we issued $240.0 million aggregate principal amount of 8.0% senior notes due 2011.  Interest on the senior notes is payable on April 1 and October 1 of each year.  Our obligations under the senior notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior basis by all of our existing and future domestic subsidiaries.  The senior notes and the subsidiary guarantees are our and the guarantors’ general unsecured obligations and are effectively junior in right of payment to all of our and the guarantors’ secured indebtedness and to the indebtedness and other liabilities of our non-guarantor subsidiaries; are pari passu in right of payment to all of our and the guarantors’ existing and future unsecured senior debt; and are senior in right of payment to all of our and the guarantors’ future subordinated debt, including the senior subordinated notes.  Our present foreign subsidiary, Les Produits Alimentaires Jacques et Fils Inc., is not a guarantor, and any future foreign or partially owned domestic subsidiaries will not be guarantors, of our senior notes.

On or after October 1, 2008, we may redeem some or all of the senior notes at a redemption price of 104.0% beginning October 1, 2008 and thereafter at prices declining annually to 100% on or after October 1, 2010.  Prior to October 1, 2007, we may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the senior notes issued in the senior note offering with the net proceeds of one or more equity offerings at the redemption price as described in the indenture governing the senior notes.  If we or any of the guarantors sell certain assets or experience specific kinds of changes in control, we must offer to purchase the senior notes at the prices as described in the indenture governing the senior notes plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption.  The indenture governing the senior notes limits our ability and the ability of the guarantors to incur additional indebtedness and issue preferred stock; make restricted payments, including dividend payments on our common stock; allow restrictions on the ability of certain subsidiaries to make distributions; sell all or substantially all of our assets or consolidate or merge with or into other companies; enter into certain transactions with affiliates; or create liens and enter into sale and leaseback transactions.  Each of the covenants is subject to a number of important exceptions and qualifications.

29

Future Capital Needs

We are highly leveraged.  On September 30, 2006, our total long-term debt and stockholders’ equity was $430.8 million and $79.3 million, respectively.

Our ability to generate sufficient cash to fund our operations depends generally on our results of operations and the availability of financing.  Our management believes that our cash on hand, cash flow from operating activities and available borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facility, will be sufficient for the foreseeable future to fund operations, meet debt service requirements, fund capital expenditures, make future acquisitions within our line of business, if any, and pay our anticipated dividends on our Class A common stock.  We expect to make capital expenditures of approximately $7.0 million for fiscal 2006.

Seasonality

Sales of a number of our products tend to be seasonal.  In the aggregate, however, our sales are not heavily weighted to any particular quarter due to the diversity of our product and brand portfolio.  Sales during the first quarter of the fiscal year are generally below those of the following three quarters.

We purchase most of the produce used to make our shelf-stable pickles, relishes, peppers and other related specialty items during the months of July through October, and we purchase substantially all of our maple syrup requirements during the months of April through July.  Consequently, our liquidity needs are greatest during these periods.

Inflation

During fiscal 2005 and the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006, we were faced with increasing prices in certain commodities, and in packaging materials, and we expect this trend may continue.  We manage this risk by entering into short-term supply contracts and advance commodities purchase agreements from time to time, and if necessary, by raising prices.  Our cost increases in fiscal 2005 and the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2006 were partially attributable to the spike in oil and natural gas prices, which have had a substantial impact on our raw material, packaging and transportation costs.  During 2005, our transportation costs also increased as a result of a shortage in truck carrier availability following Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.  We believe that through sales price increases and our cost saving efforts we have to some degree been able to offset the impact of recent raw material, packaging and transportation cost increases.  There can be no assurance, however, that any future sales price increases or cost saving efforts by us will offset the increased cost of raw material, packaging and transportation costs, or that we will be able to raise prices or reduce costs at all.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs—An Amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4” (SFAS No. 151). SFAS No. 151 amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, “Inventory Pricing,” to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage). Among other provisions, the new rule requires that items such as idle facility expense, excessive spoilage, double freight, and rehandling costs be recognized as current-period charges regardless of whether they meet the criterion of “so abnormal” as stated in ARB No. 43.  Additionally, SFAS No. 151 requires that the allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS No. 151 was adopted by us beginning on January 1, 2006. The adoption of SFAS No. 151 has not had an impact on our consolidated results of operations and financial position.

In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (FIN 48), which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. FIN 48 requires that we

30

recognize in our consolidated financial statements, the impact of a tax position, if that position is more likely than not of being sustained on audit, based on the technical merits of the position.  We currently recognize the impact of a tax position if it is probable of being sustained.  The provisions of FIN 48 are effective as of the beginning of our 2007 fiscal year, with the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle recorded as an adjustment to opening retained earnings.  At this time, we have not completed our review and assessment of the impact of the adoption of FIN 48.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (SFAS No. 157), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.  The provisions of SFAS No. 157 are effective as of the beginning of our 2008 fiscal year.  We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS No. 157 on our financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employer’s Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans” an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132R (SFAS No. 158).  SFAS No. 158 requires an employer to recognize in its statement of financial position an asset for a defined benefit plan’s over-funded status or a liability for a plan’s under-funded status and recognize changes in the funded status of a defined benefit plan in the year in which the changes occur.  These changes will be reported in our comprehensive income and as a separate component of stockholders’ equity.  SFAS No. 158 is effective for us as of December 30, 2006.  We estimate the impact of adopting SFAS No. 158 to be approximately $5.0 million, reflected as an increase in accrued expenses and a decrease to stockholders’ equity on our consolidated balance sheet, with no impact to our statements of operations or cash flows.

In September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements” (SAB No. 108), which provides interpretive guidance on the consideration of the effects of prior year misstatements in quantifying current year misstatements for the purpose of a materiality assessment.  SAB No. 108 is effective as of the end of our 2006 fiscal year, allowing a one-time transitional cumulative effect adjustment to beginning retained earnings as of January 1, 2006 for errors that were not previously deemed material, but are material under the guidance in SAB No. 108.  While we are currently evaluating the impact of adopting SAB No. 108, we do not believe that the application of SAB No. 108 will have a material effect on our results of operations or financial position.

Off-balance Sheet Arrangements

As of September 30, 2006, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K.

Commitments and Contractual Obligations

Our contractual obligations and commitments principally include obligations associated with our outstanding indebtedness and future minimum operating lease obligations as set forth in the following table as of December 31, 2005.

31

	Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligations:	Total		2006		2007		2008		2009		2010 and Thereafter
	(Dollars in thousands)
Long-term debt (1)	$	731,733	$	39,096	$	39,096	$	39,096	$	39,096	$	575,349
Operating leases	11,921		4,044		3,192		3,119		1,470		96
Other long-term obligations (2)	1,514		1,514		—		—		—		—
Total	$	745,168	$	44,654	$	42,288	$	42,215	$	40,566	$	575,445

(1)Includes interest obligations on our senior notes at an interest rate of 8.0% per annum through maturity on October 1, 2011 and on our senior subordinated notes of 12% per annum through maturity on October 30, 2016.  In January 2006, we incurred additional long-term debt of $25.0 million in the form of a new term loan, which is not reflected in the table.  See “Debt—Senior Secured Credit Facility” above.

(2)Represents expected contributions under our defined benefit pension plans in 2006 (see below).  The expected contributions beyond 2006 are not currently determinable.

During the thirty-nine week period ended September 30, 2006, there were no material changes outside the ordinary course of business in the specified contractual obligations set forth in the table above, except that in January 2006, we issued additional long-term debt of $25.0 million in the form of a new term loan under our amended senior secured credit facility due January 10, 2011, which is not reflected in the table.  See “Debt—Senior Secured Credit Facility” above.  In addition, we anticipate electing to make additional payments of approximately $1.1 million for a total contribution of $2.6 million for the plan year ended December 30, 2006 to fund our defined benefit pension plan obligations.

Forward-Looking Statements

This report includes forward-looking statements, including without limitation the statements under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”  The words “believes,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “expects,” “intends,” “estimates,” “projects” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements.  These forward looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance and achievements, or industry results, to be materially different from any future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements.  We believe important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations include the following:

·our substantial leverage;

·intense competition, changes in consumer preferences, demand for our products, the effects of changing prices for our raw materials and local economic and market conditions;

·our continued ability to promote brand equity successfully, to anticipate and respond to new consumer trends, to develop new products and markets, to broaden brand portfolios in order to compete effectively with lower priced products and in markets that are consolidating at the retail and manufacturing levels, to improve productivity and to maintain access to credit markets;

·the risks associated with the expansion of our business;

·our possible inability to integrate any businesses we acquire;

·our borrowing costs and credit ratings, which may be influenced by the credit ratings of our competitors;

·factors that affect the food industry generally, including:

32

—recalls if products become adulterated or misbranded, liability if product consumption causes injury, ingredient disclosure and labeling laws and regulations and the possibility that consumers could lose confidence in the safety and quality of certain food products, as well as recent publicity concerning the health implications of obesity and trans fatty acids;

—the effects of foreign currency movements between the Canadian dollar and U.S. dollar; and

—fluctuations in the level of our customers’ inventories and credit and other business risks related to our customers operating in a challenging economic and competitive environment; and

·the risk that our senior subordinated notes may be treated as equity for U.S. federal income tax purposes; and

·other factors discussed elsewhere in this report and in our public filings with the SEC, including under Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Developments in any of these areas could cause our results to differ materially from results that have been or may be projected by or on our behalf.

All forward-looking statements included in this report are based on information available to us on the date of this report. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained in this report.

We caution that the foregoing list of important factors is not exclusive.  We urge investors not to unduly rely on forward-looking statements contained in this report.

Item 3.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

In the normal course of operations, we are exposed to market risks arising from adverse changes in interest rates.  Market risk is defined for these purposes as the potential change in the fair value of a financial asset or liability resulting from an adverse movement in interest rates.  As of September 30, 2006, our revolving credit facility was undrawn.  As a result, our only variable rate borrowings as of September 30, 2006, are under our term loan.  Interest under the term loan is determined based on alternative rates as stipulated in the credit facility, including the base lending rate per annum plus an applicable margin of 1.75%, and LIBOR plus an applicable margin of 2.75%.  Interest under our revolving credit facility is determined based on several alternative rates as stipulated in the revolving credit facility, including the base lending rate per annum plus an applicable margin, or LIBOR plus an applicable margin.  As of September 30, 2006, the interest rate for the term loan was 8.36% (based upon a six-month LIBOR contract expiring on January 17, 2007).  A 100 basis point increase in interest rates, applied to our variable rate borrowings at September 30, 2006, would result in an annual increase in interest expense and a corresponding reduction in cash flow of $0.3 million.

We also have outstanding $240.0 million principal amount of 8.0% senior notes due October 1, 2011, with interest payable semiannually on April 1 and October 1 of each year.  The fair value of the senior notes at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, based on quoted market prices, was $246.6 million and $246.0 million, respectively.

We also have outstanding $165.8 million principal amount of 12.0% senior subordinated notes due October 30, 2016, with interest payable quarterly on January 30, April 30, July 30 and October 30 of each year.  Of such outstanding principal amount, $143.0 million principal amount is represented by 20.0 million EISs.  Each EIS represents one share of our Class A common stock and $7.15 principal amount of our senior subordinated notes.  As of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the fair value of the EISs, based on the per EIS closing price on the AMEX on June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 was $379.0 million and $290.4

33

million, respectively.  It is not practicable to estimate the fair value of the $143.0 principal amount of senior subordinated notes represented by the EISs.  Of the $165.8 million aggregate principal amount of senior subordinated notes outstanding, $22.8 million principal amount is not represented by EISs and trades separately.  The fair value of the separate senior subordinated notes at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, based on quoted market prices, was $25.5 million.

The information under the heading “Inflation” under Item 2, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 4.    Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.  As required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, our management, including our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report.  As defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that we use that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.  Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Based on that evaluation, our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.  As required by Rule 13a-15(d) under the Exchange Act, our management, including our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, also conducted an evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting to determine whether any change occurred during the quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.  Based on that evaluation, our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer concluded that there has been no change during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls.  Our company’s management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud.  A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met.  The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs.  Further, because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our company have been detected.  These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake.  Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls.  The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.  Projections of any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks.  Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures.

34

PART II
OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.Legal Proceedings

We are involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business, including proceedings involving product liability claims, worker’s compensation and other employee claims, and tort and other general liability claims, for which we carry insurance, as well as trademark, copyright, patent infringement and related claims and legal actions.  In the opinion of our management, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

Item 1A.Risk Factors

We do not believe there have been any material changes in our risk factors as previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 7, 2006.

Item 2.Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.

Item 3.Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

Item 4.Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

Not applicable.

Item 5.Other Information

Not applicable.

Item 6.Exhibits

EXHIBIT NO.	DESCRIPTION
31.1	Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of the Chief Executive Officer.
31.2	Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of the Chief Financial Officer.
32.1	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of the Chief Executive Officer.
32.2	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of the Chief Financial Officer.

35

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Dated: November 1, 2006	B&G FOODS, INC.
	By:	/s/ Robert C. Cantwell
		Robert C. Cantwell Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Authorized Officer)

36

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT NO.	DESCRIPTION
31.1	Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of the Chief Executive Officer.
31.2	Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of the Chief Financial Officer.
32.1	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of the Chief Executive Officer.
32.2	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of the Chief Financial Officer.