Note: Estimated aggregate impact includes administrative cost and franchise fee components (values have been rounded).
Appendix E
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
Inpatient Capital Component
The capital component of the CY 2008 DRG hospital payment rates was increased on January 1, 2008. The changes are being reflected in the managed care capitation rates as it is recognized that the majority of contracts held by the health plans reflect a percentage of the base FFS reimbursement prior to annual capital settlements with providers. As such, Milliman reviewed the impact of the capital changes using a distribution of admissions and paid claims by provider appropriate for the CFC managed care enrolled population.
The increase was not included in the capitation rates effective January 1, 2008 due to the timing of this change. Milliman has included this adjustment into the capitation rates to be effective from July 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008. The adjustment reflects a retro-active payment for January to June 2008 as well as a prospective adjustment for July to December 2008.
Milliman obtained the hospital capital rates for CY 2007 and CY 2008 by provider as well as the distribution of paid claims and admissions by provider for SFY 2006. The adjustment factor was calculated using the following Methodology:
Adjustment Factor = [Admissions SFY2006 X (Capital CY2008 – Capital CY2007)] /Total Paid
Community Provider Fee Schedule Update
The fee schedule used to reimburse FFS community providers was updated by ODJFS effective July 1, 2008. The changes are being reflected in the managed care capitation rates as it is recognized that the majority of contracts held by the health plans reflect a percentage of the FFS reimbursement. As such, Milliman reviewed the impact of the fee changes using a distribution of services and paid claims appropriate for the CFC managed care enrolled population.
Milliman obtained the fee schedule by procedure code and modifier code for the current fees (prior to July 1, 2008) and the revised fees (post July 1, 2008) as well as the distribution of paid claims and utilization counts for SFY 2006. The adjustment factor was calculated using the following Methodology:
Adjustment Factor = [Total Paid SFY2006 X (Fee Post 7 1 08 / Fee Prior to 7 1 08)] / Total Paid SFY2006 - 1
Table 3 summarizes the impact of the community provider fee schedule update by category of service.
Appendix E
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
DEPARTMENT OF JOB AND FAMILY SERVICES
COVERED FAMILIES AND CHILDREN
Community Provider Fee Adjustments
| |
| |
| 0.3% |
| |
| (1.2%) |
| 0.0% |
| 6.5% |
| 14.0% |
| 9.2% |
| 5.7% |
| 6.7% |
Immunizations & Injection | 15.0% |
| 3.2% |
| 5.7% |
| |
| (0.6%) |
| 0.3% |
| |
Mental Health/Substance Abuse | 7.1 % |
| 2.3% |
| 6.1% |
| 3.0% |
Non-Emergent Transportation | 2.3 % |
| 2.1% |
| 0.0% |
| 2.9% |
Note: Values have been rounded.
Appendix E
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
Dental Benefit Restoration
Dental benefits will be restored to the adult rate groups effective July 1, 2008. This impact was calculated and included in previous drafts of the CY 2008 capitation rates. However, the benefit restoration was delayed and, as such, was not included in the final capitation rates effective January 1, 2008.
The adjustment factors summarized in Table 2 for the dental benefit restoration are consistent with the previously provided amounts, with one exception. The impact of pent-up demand previously included was increased from 2% to 4%. This reflects that the total of the pent-up demand is still assumed to occur; however, it will occur over only half of the calendar year.
The capitation rates effective January 1, 2008 included an increase due to the expansion of coverage to the CHIP program from 200% to 300% FPL. This expansion has not begun as of this time and remains uncertain for the remainder of the calendar year. As such, Milliman has included an adjustment in the capitation rates effective for July to December 2008. The adjustment reflects a retro-active adjustment for January to June 2008 as well as a prospective adjustment for July to December 2008 to remove the total impact of the CHIP III expansion from the entire calendar year.
The adjustment factor was calculated by removing the increase from the current rates
[1 / (1+0.17%)] and retro-actively removing the previously increased amount [1-0.17%].
Milliman and ODJFS will monitor the progress of the CHIP III expansion and may revise the rates prior to CY 2009 should a material change occur.
The capitation rates effective January 1, 2008 included a reduction due to the anticipated improvements in the TPL data and information that would allow for increased TPL collections and cost avoidance by the health plans. The planned improvements have been delayed until October 1, 2008. As such, Milliman has included an adjustment in the capitation rates effective for July to December 2008. The adjustment reflects a retro-active payment for January to June 2008 as well as a prospective adjustment for July to September 2008 to remove the value of the TPL improvements from the first nine months of calendar year 2008. The adjustment will be applied to the payments for July to December 2008.
The adjustment factor was calculated by modifying the reduction from the current rates and retro-actively restoring the previously reduced amount [(l+.28%) / (1 -.55%)].
Appendix E
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
The franchise fee amount was increased from 4.5% to 5.5% of the capitation rate effective July 1, 2008. This adjustment was applied by removing the current franchise fee percent and applying the revised franchise fee percent for all regions and rate groups.
Franchise Fee - Timing Adjustment
The revision of the franchise fee amount creates an exposure issue for the health plans as the timing and methodology of the capitation payments differs from the collection of the fees by the State. Franchise fee payments included in the capitation rates are paid based on the incurred dates of service for the Delivery and Non-Delivery rate groups. Collections of the franchise fee by the State are based on the date of payment-of the capitation rate. As such, to the extent there is a lag in payment of the capitation rate, there is an inherent mis-alignment of payment and collection of the franchise fee. This issue only arises when a change in the franchise fee percent occurs.
Milliman reviewed the lag time of capitation incurred periods to capitation payment periods to estimate the impact of this change. For the Non-Delivery rate groups, the capitation payments primarily occur on or 'before the service month eliminating the impact of this change. For the Delivery rate group, the capitation payments are paid with significant lag times, similar to the lag found in FFS claims. As such, Milliman included an adjustment to the Deliver)' payment for July to December 2008 to reflect this change.
Table 4 summarizes the percentage of deliver)' capitation payment amounts between those paid prior to July 1, 2008 and those paid after July 1, 2008. The percentages reflect an average historical amount using a 12 month completion factor estimate, after removing the highest and lowest values.
Appendix E
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
DEPARTMENT OF JOB AND FAMILY SERVICES
COVERED FAMILIES AND CHILDREN
Delivery Rate Group - Lag Factors
| Percentage Paid Prior to July 1, 2008 | Percentage Paid After July 1, 2008 |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
Note: Values have been rounded.
If you have any questions regarding the enclosed information, please do not hesitate to contact me at
Robert M. Damler, FSA, MAAA
Principal and Consulting Actuary
Appendix E
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
Department of Job and Family Services
Capitation Rate Comparison - CFC
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | 101,760 | | | $ | 568.17 | | | $ | 57,816,695 | | | $ | 596.95 | | | $ | 60,745,334 | | | | 5.1 | % | | $ | 2,928,638 | |
| | | | 79,228 | | | | 146.51 | | | | 11,607,694 | | | | 154.00 | | | | 12,201,112 | | | | 5.1 | % | | | 593,418 | |
| | | | 613,230 | | | | 99.10 | | | | 60,771,093 | | | | 103.23 | | | | 63,303,733 | | | | 4.2 | % | | | 2,532,640 | |
| | | | 81,608 | | | | 165.19 | | | | 13,480,826 | | | | 172.11 | | | | 14,045,553 | | | | 4.2 | % | | | 564,727 | |
| | | | 73,398 | | | | 118.54 | | | | 8,700,599 | | | | 122.99 | | | | 9,027,220 | | | | 3.8 | % | | | 326,621 | |
| | | | 275,119 | | | | 304.31 | | | | 83,721,311 | | | | 322.46 | | | | 88,714,712 | | | | 6.0 | % | | | 4,993,401 | |
| | | | 84,102 | | | | 198.75 | | | | 16,715,273 | | | | 211.71 | | | | 17,805,234 | | | | 6.5 | % | | | 1,089,962 | |
| | | | 32,705 | | | | 485.77 | | | | 15,886,865 | | | | 509.32 | | | | 16,657,056 | | | | 4.8 | % | | | 770,191 | |
| | | | 30,857 | | | | 376.25 | | | | 11,609,758 | | | | 401.72 | | | | 12,395,673 | | | | 6.8 | % | | | 785,915 | |
| | | | 1,372,005 | | | | 204.31 | | | | 280,310,113 | | | | 214.94 | | | | 294,895,626 | | | | 5.2 | % | | | 14,585,513 | |
| | | | 5,427 | | | | 3,754.26 | | | | 20,374,369 | | | | 3,969.58 | | | | 21,542,911 | | | | 5.7 | % | | | 1,168,542 | |
| | | | 1,372,005 | | | $ | 219.16 | | | $ | 300,684,482 | | | $ | 230.64 | | | $ | 316,438,537 | | | | 5.2 | % | | $ | 15,754,055 | |
| | | | 50,472 | | | $ | 553.95 | | | $ | 27,958,687 | | | $ | 582.04 | | | $ | 29,376,432 | | | | 5.1 | % | | $ | 1,417,744 | |
| | | | 37,738 | | | | 142.85 | | | | 5,390,873 | | | | 150.15 | | | | 5,666,361 | | | | 5.1 | % | | | 275,487 | |
| | | | 334,892 | | | | 96.62 | | | | 32,357,265 | | | | 100.66 | | | | 33,710,229 | | | | 4.2 | % | | | 1,352,964 | |
| | | | 48,233 | | | | 161.06 | | | | 7,768,326 | | | | 167.81 | | | | 8,093,896 | | | | 4.2 | % | | | 325,569 | |
| | | | 44,187 | | | | 115.57 | | | | 5,106,692 | | | | 119.92 | | | | 5,298,905 | | | | 3.8 | % | | | 192,213 | |
| | | | 160,491 | | | | 296.69 | | | | 47,616,075 | | | | 314.41 | | | | 50,459,975 | | | | 6.0 | % | | | 2,843,901 | |
| | | | 45,442 | | | | 193.78 | | | | 8,805,654 | | | | 206.42 | | | | 9,380,034 | | | | 6.5 | % | | | 574,381 | |
| | | | 19,782 | | | | 473.60 | | | | 9,368,518 | | | | 496.60 | | | | 9,823,493 | | | | 4.9 | % | | | 454,974 | |
| | | | 16,944 | | | | 366.84 | | | | 6,215,737 | | | | 391.69 | | | | 6,636,795 | | | | 6.8 | % | | | 421,058 | |
| | | | 758,179 | | | | 198.62 | | | | 150,587.828 | | | | 208.98 | | | | 158,446,120 | | | | 5.2 | % | | | 7,858,292 | |
| | | | 3,193 | | | | 3,990.44 | | | | 12,741,475 | | | | 4,217.02 | | | | 13,464,945 | | | | 5.7 | % | | | 723,470 | |
| | | | 758,179 | | | $ | 215.42 | | | $ | 163,329,303 | | | $ | 226.74 | | | $ | 171,911,065 | | | | 5.3 | % | | $ | 8,581,762 | |
| | | | 81,194 | | | $ | 537.65 | | | $ | 43,653,685 | | | $ | 564.33 | | | $ | 45,819,928 | | | | 5.0 | % | | $ | 2,166,243 | |
| | | | 65,469 | | | | 138.65 | | | | 9,077,208 | | | | 145.58 | | | | 9,530,904 | | | | 5.0 | % | | | 453,697 | |
| | | | 580,015 | | | | 93.78 | | | | 54,393,760 | | | | 97.58 | | | | 56,597,815 | | | | 4.1 | % | | | 2,204,055 | |
| | | | 90,422 | | | | 156.32 | | | | 14,134,689 | | | | 162.70 | | | | | | | 4.1 | % | | | 576,889 | |
| | | | 82,194 | | | | 112.18 | | | | 9,220,523 | | | | 116.25 | | | | 9,555,053 | | | | 3.6 | % | | | 334,530 | |
| | | | 280,510 | | | | 287.97 | | | | 80,778,321 | | | | 304.84 | | | | 85,510,516 | | | | 5.9 | % | | | 4,732,195 | |
| | | | 59,915 | | | | 188.08 | | | | 11,268,813 | | | | 200.14 | | | | 11,991,388 | | | | 6.4 | % | | | 722,575 | |
| | | | 39,374 | | | | 459.68 | | | | 18,099,440 | | | | 481.47 | | | | 18,957,400 | | | | 4.7 | % | | | 857,959 | |
| | | | 25,467 | | | | 356.04 | | | | 9,067,271 | | | | 379.76 | | | | 9,671,348 | | | | 6.7 | %. | | | 604,077 | |
| | | | 1,304,558 | | | | 191.40 | | | | 249,693,709 | | | | 201.10 | | | | 262,345,929• | | | | 5.1 | % | | | 12,652,220 | |
| | | | 4,936 | | | | 4,105.75 | | | | 20,263,929 | | | | 4,343.69 | | | | 21,438,282 | | | | 5.8 | %. | | | 1,174,353 | |
| | | | 1,304,558 | | | $ | 206.93 | | | $ | 269,957,638 | | | $ | 217.53 | | | $ | 283,784,211 | | | | 5.1 | % | | $ | 13,826,573 | |
| | | | 21,399 | | | $ | 580.71 | | | $ | 12,426,613 | | | $ | 610.12 | | | $ | 13,055,958 | | | | 5.1 | % | | $ | 629,345 | |
| | | | 16,275 | | | | 149.76 | | | | 2,437,344 | | | | 157.39 | | | | 2,561,522 | | | | 5.1 | % | | | 124,178 | |
| | | | 153,239 | | | | 101.29 | | | | 15,521,528 | | | | 105.49 | | | | 16,165,129 | | | | 4.1 | % | | | 643,602 | |
| | | | 23,927 | | | | 168.84 | | | | 4,039,750 | | | | 175.90 | | | | 4,208,671 | | | | 4.2 | % | | | 168,921 | |
| | | | 22,188 | | | | 121.16 | | | | 2,688,298 | | | | 125.70 | | | | 2,789,032 | | | | 3.7 | %, | | | 100,734 | |
| | | | 72,662 | | | | 311.04 | | | | 22,600,633 | | | | 329.58 | | | | 23,947,777 | | | | 6.0 | % | | | 1,347,144 | |
| | | | 20,846 | | | | 203.14 | | | | 4,234,656 | | | | 216.39 | | | | 4,510,866 | | | | 6.5 | % | | | 276,210 | |
| | | | 9,292 | | | | 496.49 | | | | 4,613,137 | | | | 520.55 | | | | 4,836,690 | | | | 4.8 | % | | | 223,553 | |
| | | | 7,043 | | | | 384.55 | | | | 2,708,193 | | | | 410.58 | | | | 2,891,510 | | | | 6.8 | % | | | 183,316 | |
| | | | 346,869 | | | | 205.47 | | | | 71,270,153 | | | | 216.13 | | | | 74,967,156 | | | | 5.2 | % | | | 3,697,003 | |
| | | | 1,342 | | | | 4,113.88 | | | | 5,518,770 | | | | 4,351.17 | | | | 5,837,095 | | | | 5.8 | % | | | 318,325 | |
| | | | 346,869 | | | $ | 221.38 | | | | | | $ | 232.95 | | | $ | 80,804,250 | | | | 5.2 | % | | $ | 4,015,327 | |
| | | | 51,535 | | | $ | 565.81 | | | $ | 29,159,018 | | | $ | 595.46 | | | $ | 30,687,031 | | | | 5.2 | % | | $ | 1,528,013 | |
| | | | 38,387 | | | | 145.91 | | | | 5,600,974 | | | | 153.61 | | | | 5,896,550 | | | | 5.3 | % | | | 295,576 | |
| | | | 313,927 | | | | 98.69 | | | | 30,981,456 | | | | 102.96 | | | | 32,321,924 | | | | 4.3 | % | | | 1,340,468 | |
| | | | 45,514 | | | | 164.51 | | | | 7,487,508 | | | | 171.68 | | | | 7,813,844 | | | | 4.4 | % | | | 326,335 | |
| | | | 41,124 | | | | 118.04 | | | | 4,854,218 | | | | 122.68 | | | | 5,045,031 | | | | 3.9 | % | | | 190,813 | |
| | | | 145,022 | | | | 303.05 | | | | 43,948,917 | | | | 321.64 | | | | 46,644,876 | | | | 6.1 | % | | | 2,695,959 | |
| | | | 44,005 | | | | 197.94 | | | | 8,710,350 | | | | 211.19 | | | | 9,293,416 | | | | 6.7 | % | | | 583,066 | |
| | | | 16,482 | | | | 483.76 | | | | 7,973,090 | | | | 508.04 | | | | 8,373,261 | | | | 5.0 | % | | | 400,171 | |
| | | | 18,071 | | | | 374.69 | | | | 6,771,023 | | | | 400.72 | | | | 7,241,411 | | | | 6.9 | % | | | 470,388 | |
| | | | 714.066 | | | | 203.74 | | | | 145,486,555 | | | | 214.71 | | | | 153,317,344 | | | | 5.4 | % | | | 7,830,790 | |
| | | | 3,040 | | | | 3,768.39 | | | | | | | | 3,981.10 | | | | 12,102,544 | | | | 5.6 | % | | | 646,638 | |
| | | | 714,066 | | | $ | 219.79 | | | $ | 156,942,460 | | | $ | 231.66 | | | $ | 165,419,888 | | | | 5.4 | % | | $ | 8,477,428 | |
Appendix E
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
State of Ohio
Department of Job and Family Services
Capitation Rate Comparison - CFC
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | 27,057 | | | $ | 575.04 | | | $ | 15,558,570 | | | $ | 604.37 | | | $ | 16,352,137 | | | | 5.1 | % | | $ | 793,567 | |
| | | | 22,178 | | | | 148.29 | | | | 3,288,701 | | | | 155.90 | | | | 3,457,472 | | | | 5.1 | % | | | 168,771 | |
| | | | 202,856 | | | | 100.30 | | | | 20,346,407 | | | | 104.51 | | | | 21,200,428 | | | | 4.2 | % | | | 854,022 | |
| | | | 30,272 | | | | 167.19 | | | | 5,061,176 | | | | 174.25 | | | | 5,274,896 | | | | 4.2 | % | | | 213,720 | |
| | | | 28,111 | | | | 119.98 | | | | 3,372,698 | | | | 124.52 | | | | 3,500,319 | | | | 3.8 | % | | | 127.622 | |
| | | | 102,587 | | | | 308.00 | | | | 31,596,796 | | | | 326.47 | | | | 33,491,578 | | | | 6.0 | % | | | 1,894,782 | |
| | | | 45,156 | | | | 201.16 | | | | 9,083,581 | | | | 214.34 | | | | 9,678,737 | | | | 6.6 | % | | | 595,156 | |
| | | | 13,518 | | | | 491.63 | | | | 6,645,854 | | | | 515.65 | | | | 6,970,557 | | | | 4.9 | % | | | 324.702 | |
| | | | 9,472 | | | | 380.81 | | | | 3,606,842 | | | | 406.72 | | | | 3,852,248 | | | | 6.8 | % | | | 245,407 | |
| | | | 481,205 | | | | 204.82 | | | | 98,560,625 | | | | 215.66 | | | | 103,778,373 | | | | 5.3 | % | | | 5,217,748 | |
| | | | 1,764 | | | | 3,557.15 | | | | 6,274,813 | | | | 3,765.08 | | | | 6,641,601 | | | | 5.8 | % | | | 366,789 | |
| | | | 481,205 | | | $ | 217.86 | | | $ | 104,835,437 | | | $ | 229.47 | | | $ | 110,419,974 | | | | 5.3 | % | | $ | 5,584,537 | |
| | | | 68,146 | | | $ | 606.96 | | | $ | 41,361,896 | | | $ | 635.17 | | | $ | 43,284,295 | | | | 4.6 | % | | $ | 1,922,399 | |
| | | | 49,201 | | | | 156.52 | | | | 7,700,862 | | | | 163.85 | | | | 8,061,502 | | | | 4.7 | % | | | 360,640 | |
| | | | 380,559 | | | | 105.87 | | | | 40,289,781 | | | | 109.84 | | | | 41,800,601 | | | | 3.7 | % | | | 1,510,819 | |
| | | | 51,497 | | | | 176.47 | | | | 9,087,676 | | | | 183.12 | | | | 9,430,131 | | | | 3.8 | % | | | 342.455 | |
| | | | 44,200 | | | | 126.64 | | | | 5,597,488 | | | | 130.86 | | | | 5,784,012 | | | | 3.3 | % | | | 186,524 | |
| | | | 160,588 | | | | 325.09 | | | | 52,205,553 | | | | 343.11 | | | | 55,099,349 | | | | 5.5 | % | | | 2,893,796 | |
| | | | 42,270 | | | | 212.34 | | | | 8,975,612 | | | | 225.27 | | | | 9,522,163 | | | | 6.1 | % | | | 546,551 | |
| | | | 17,095 | | | | 518.94 | | | | 8,871,020 | | | | 541.93 | | | | 9,264,022 | | | | 4.4 | % | | | 393,003 | |
| | | | 21,442 | | | | 401.95 | | | | 8,618,612 | | | | 427.44 | | | | 9,165,168 | | | | 6.3 | % | | | 546,557 | |
| | | | 834,997 | | | | 218.81 | | | | 182,708,500 | | | | 229.24 | | | | 191,411,242 | | | | 4.8 | % | | | 8,702,743 | |
| | | | 3,675 | | | | 4,011.88 | | | | 14,743,659 | | | | 4,242.15 | | | | 15,589,901 | | | | 5.7 | % | | | 846,242 | |
| | | | 834,997 | | | $ | 236.47 | | | $ | 197,452,159 | | | $ | 247.91 | | | $ | 207,001,144 | | | | 4.8 | % | | $ | 9,548,985 | |
| | | | 44,127 | | | $ | 572.54 | | | $ | 25,264,473 | | | $ | 602.37 | | | $ | 26,580,781 | | | | 5.2 | % | | $ | 1,316,308 | |
| | | | 32,928 | | | | 147.65 | | | | 4,861,819 | | | | 155.40 | | | | 5,117,011 | | | | 5.2 | % | | | 255,192 | |
| | | | 264,267 | | | | 99.86 | | | | 26,389,703 | | | | 104.16 | | | | 27,526,051 | | | | 4.3 | % | | | 1,136,348 | |
| | | | 38,572 | | | | 166.47 | | | | 6,420,998 | | | | 173.67 | | | | 6,698,712 | | | | 4.3 | % | | | 277,715 | |
| | | | 33,698 | | | | 119.46 | | | | 4,025,503 | | | | 124.11 | | | | 4,182,197 | | | | 3.9 | % | | | 156,693 | |
| | | | 117,439 | | | | 306.66 | | | | 36,013,844 | | | | 325.39 | | | | 38,213,476 | | | | 6.1 | % | | | 2,199,632 | |
| | | | 33,241 | | | | 200.29 | | | | 6,657,840 | | | | 213.64 | | | | 7,101,607 | | | | 6.7 | % | | | 443,767 | |
| | | | 13,516 | | | | 489.51 | | | | 6,616,217 | | | | 513.95 | | | | 6,946,548 | | | | 5.0 | % | | | 330,331 | |
| | | | 13,711 | | | | 379.15 | | | | 5,198,526 | | | | 405.37 | | | | 5,558,028 | | | | 6.9 | % | | | 359,502 | |
| | | | 591,498 | | | | 205.32 | | | | 121,448,922 | | | | 216.27 | | | | 127,924,412 | | | | 5.3 | % | | | 6,475,490 | |
| | | | 2,458 | | | | 4,342,68 | | | | 10,674,307 | | | | 4,589.24 | | | | 11,280,352 | | | | 5.7 | % | | | 606,044 | |
| | | | 591,498 | | | $ | 223.37 | | | $ | 132,123,229 | | | $ | 235.34 | | | $ | 139,204,764 | | | | 5.4 | % | | $ | 7,081,534 | |
| | | | 445,688 | | | $ | 568.11 | | | $ | 253,199,638 | | | $ | 596.61 | | | $ | 265,901,895 | | | | 5.0 | % | | $ | 12,702,257 | |
| | | | 341,402 | | | | 146.35 | | | | 49,965,476 | | | | 153.76 | | | | 52,492,435 | | | | 5.1 | % | | | 2,526,959 | |
| | | | 2,842,984 | | | | 98.86 | | | | 281,050,992 | | | | 102.93 | | | | 292,625,909 | | | | 4.1 | % | | | 11,574,918 | |
| | | | 410,043 | | | | 164.57 | | | | 67,480,948 | | | | 171.39 | | | | 70,277,281 | | | | 4.1 | % | | | 2,796,333 | |
| | | | 369,099 | | | | 118.03 | | | | 43,566,019 | | | | 122.41 | | | | 45,181,768 | | | | 3.7 | % | | | 1,615,750 | |
| | | | 1,314,417 | | | | 303.16 | | | | 398,481,449 | | | | 321.12 | | | | 422,082,259 | | | | 5.9 | % | | | 23,600,810 | |
| | | | 374,977 | | | | 198.55 | | | | 74,451,778 | | | | 211.44 | | | | 79,283,446 | | | | 6.5 | % | | | 4,831,668 | |
| | | | 161,762 | | | | 482.65 | | | | 78,074,142 | | | | 505.86 | | | | 81,829,027 | | | | 4.8 | % | | | 3,754,885 | |
| | | | 143,006 | | | | 376.18 | | | | 53,795,962 | | | | 401.47 | | | | 57,412,182 | | | | 6.7 | % | | | 3,616,221 | |
| | | | 6,403,375 | | | | 203.03 | | | | 1,300,066,404 | | | | 213.49 | | | | 1,367.086,203 | | | | 5.2 | % | | | 67,019,799 | |
| | | | 25,834 | | | | 3,950.11 | | | | 102,047,228 | | | | 4,176.57 | | | | 107,897,630 | | | | 5.7 | % | | | 5,850,403 | |
| | | | 6,403,375 | | | $ | 218.96 | | | $ | 1,402,113,632 | | | $ | 230.34 | | | $ | 1,474,983,833 | | | | 5.2 | % | | $ | 72,870,202 | |
Appendix E
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
DEPARTMENT OF JOB AND FAMILY SERVICES
Covered Families and Children
Capitation Rates July 1, 2008 to December 1, 2008
I, Robert M. Damler, am a Principal and Consulting Actuary with the firm of Milliman, Inc. I am a Fellow of the Society of Actuaries and a Member of the American Academy of Actuaries. 1 was retained by the State of Ohio, Department of Job and Family Services to perform an actuarial review and certification regarding the development of the capitation rates to be effective from July 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008. The capitation rates were developed for the Covered Families and Children managed care eligible populations. I have experience in the examination of financial calculations for Medicaid programs and meet the qualification standards for rendering this opinion.
I reviewed the historical claims experience for reasonableness and consistency. I have developed certain actuarial assumptions and actuarial methodologies regarding the projection of healthcare expenditures into future periods. I have complied with the elements of the rate setting checklist CM.S developed for its Regional Offices regarding 42 CFR 438.6(c) for capitated Medicaid managed care plans.
The capitation rates provided with this certification are effective for a six month rating period beginning July 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008. The capitation rates associated with this certification were previously certified by Milliman and approved by CMS for the period of Jan 1, 2008 through Dec 31, 2008. This certification reflects modifications to the rates for policy and program changes. At the end of the six month period, the capitation rates will be updated for calendar year 2009. The update may be based on fee-for-service experience, managed care utilization and trend experience, policy and procedure changes, and other changes in the health care market. A separate certification will be provided with the updated rates.
The capitation rates provided with this certification are considered actuarially sound, defined as: the capitation rates have been developed in accordance with generally accepted actuarial principles and practices; the capitation rates are appropriate for the populations to be covered, and the services to be furnished under the contract; and, the capitation rates meet the requirements of 42 CFR 438.6(c).
Appendix E
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
This actuarial certification has been based on the actuarial methods, considerations, and analyses promulgated from time to time through the Actuarial Standards of Practice by the Actuarial Standards Board.
/s/ Robert Damler
Robert M. Damler, FSA
Member, American Academy of Actuaries
Milliman makes no representations or warranties regarding the contents of this letter to third parties. Likewise, third parties are instructed that they are to place no reliance upon this letter prepared for ODJFS by Milliman that would result in the creation of any duty or liability under any theory of law by Milliman or its employees to third parties. Other parties receiving this letter must rely upon their own experts in drawing conclusions about the capitation rates, assumptions, and trends.
Appendix F
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
APPENDIX F | |
REGIONAL RATES | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1. PREMIUM RATES WITHOUT THE AT-RISK PAYMENT AMOUNTS FOR 07/01/08 THROUGH 11/30/08 SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: | |
An at-risk amount of 1% is applied to the MCP rates. The status of the at-risk amount is determined in accordance with Appendix O, performance incentives. | |
MCP: WellCare of Ohio, Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SERVICE | REGIONAL | | HF/HST | | | HF/HST | | | HF/HST | | | HF/HST | | | HF/HST | | | HF | | | HF | | | HF | | | HST | | | Delivery | |
ENROLLMENT | STATUS | | Age < 1 | | | Age 1 | | | Age 2-13 | | | Age 14-18 | | | Age 14-18 | | | Age 19-44 | | | Age 19-44 | | | Age 45 | | | Age 19-64 | | | Payment | |
AREA | | | | | | | | | | | | Male | | | Female | | | Male | | | Female | | | and over | | | Female | | | | |
Northeast | Mandatory | | $ | 564.33 | | | $ | 145.58 | | | $ | 97.58 | | | $ | 116.25 | | | $ | 162.70 | | | $ | 200.14 | | | $ | 304.84 | | | $ | 481.47 | | | $ | 379.76 | | | $ | 4,343.69 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
List of Eligible Assistance Groups (AGs) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Healthy Families: - MA-C Categorically eligible due to TANF cash | | | | | | | | | |
- MA-T Children under 21 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- MA-Y Transitional Medicaid | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Healthy Start: - MA-P Pregnant Women and Children | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
For the SFY 2009 contract period, MCPs will be put at-risk for a portion of the premiums received for members in regions they served as of January 1, 2006, provided the MCP has participated in the program for more than twenty-four months. MCPs will be put at-risk for a portion of the premiums received for members in regions they began serving after January 1, 2006, beginning with the MCP's twenty-fifth month of membership in each region. The at-risk amount will be determined separately for each region an MCP serves. | | | | | |
Appendix F
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
APPENDIX F | |
REGIONAL RATES | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2. AT-RISK AMOUNTS FOR 07/01/08 THROUGH 11/30/08 SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: | |
An at-risk amount of 1% is applied to the MCP rates. The status of the at-risk amount is determined in accordance with Appendix O, performance incentives. | |
MCP: WellCare of Ohio, Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SERVICE | REGIONAL | | HF/HST | | | HF/HST | | | HF/HST | | | HF/HST | | | HF/HST | | | HF | | | HF | | | HF | | | HST | | | Delivery | |
ENROLLMENT | STATUS | | Age < 1 | | | Age 1 | | | Age 2-13 | | | Age 14-18 | | | Age 14-18 | | | Age 19-44 | | | Age 19-44 | | | Age 45 | | | Age 19-64 | | | Payment | |
AREA | | | | | | | | | | | | Male | | | Female | | | Male | | | Female | | | and over | | | Female | | | | |
Northeast | Mandatory | | $ | 0.00 | | | $ | 0.00 | | | $ | 0.00 | | | $ | 0.00 | | | $ | 0.00 | | | $ | 0.00 | | | $ | 0.00 | | | $ | 0.00 | | | $ | 0.00 | | | $ | 0.00 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
List of Eligible Assistance Groups (AGs) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Healthy Families: - MA-C Categorically eligible due to TANF cash | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- MA-T Children under 21 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- MA-Y Transitional Medicaid | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Healthy Start: - MA-P Pregnant Women and Children | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
For the SFY 2009 contract period, MCPs will be put at-risk for a portion of the premiums received for members in regions they served as of January 1, 2006, provided the MCP has participated in the program for more than twenty-four months.
MCPs will be put at-risk for a portion of the premiums received for members in regions they began serving after January 1, 2006, beginning with the MCP's twenty-fifth month of membership in each region. The at-risk amount will be determined separately for each region an MCP serves.
Appendix F
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
APPENDIX F | |
REGIONAL RATES | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
3. PREMIUM RATES FOR 07/01/08 THROUGH 11/30/08 SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: | |
An at-risk amount of 1% is applied to the MCP rates. The status of the at-risk amount is determined in accordance with Appendix O, performance incentives. | |
MCP: WellCare of Ohio, Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SERVICE | REGIONAL | | HF/HST | | | HF/HST | | | HF/HST | | | HF/HST | | | HF/HST | | | HF | | | HF | | | HF | | | HST | | | Delivery | |
ENROLLMENT | STATUS | | Age < 1 | | | Age 1 | | | Age 2-13 | | | Age 14-18 | | | Age 14-18 | | | Age 19-44 | | | Age 19-44 | | | Age 45 | | | Age 19-64 | | | Payment | |
AREA | | | | | | | | | | | | Male | | | Female | | | Male | | | Female | | | and over | | | Female | | | | |
Northeast | Mandatory | | $ | 564.33 | | | $ | 145.58 | | | $ | 97.58 | | | $ | 116.25 | | | $ | 162.70 | | | $ | 200.14 | | | $ | 304.84 | | | $ | 481.47 | | | $ | 379.76 | | | $ | 4,343.69 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
List of Eligible Assistance Groups (AGs) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Healthy Families: - MA-C Categorically eligible due to TANF cash | | | | | | | | | |
- MA-T Children under 21 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- MA-Y Transitional Medicaid | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Healthy Start: - MA-P Pregnant Women and Children | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
For the SFY 2009 contract period, MCPs will be put at-risk for a portion of the premiums received for members in regions they served as of January 1, 2006, provided the | | | | | |
MCP has participated in the program for more than twenty-four months. MCPs will be put at-risk for a portion of the premiums received for members in regions they began serving after January 1, 2006, beginning with the MCP's twenty-fifth month of membership in each region. The at-risk amount will be determined separately for each region an MCP serves. | | | | |
Appendix F
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
APPENDIX F | |
REGIONAL RATES | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1. PREMIUM RATES WITHOUT THE AT-RISK PAYMENT AMOUNTS FOR 12/01/08 THROUGH 12/31/08 SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: | |
An at-risk amount of 1% is applied to the MCP rates. The status of the at-risk amount is determined in accordance with Appendix O, performance incentives. | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
MCP: WellCare of Ohio, Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SERVICE | REGIONAL | | HF/HST | | | HF/HST | | | HF/HST | | | HF/HST | | | HF/HST | | | HF | | | HF | | | HF | | | HST | | | Delivery | |
ENROLLMENT | STATUS | | Age < 1 | | | Age 1 | | | Age 2-13 | | | Age 14-18 | | | Age 14-18 | | | Age 19-44 | | | Age 19-44 | | | Age 45 | | | Age 19-64 | | | Payment | |
AREA | | | | | | | | | | | | Male | | | Female | | | Male | | | Female | | | and over | | | Female | | | | |
Northeast | Mandatory | | $ | 559.00 | | | $ | 144.20 | | | $ | 96.66 | | | $ | 115.15 | | | $ | 161.16 | | | $ | 198.25 | | | $ | 301.96 | | | $ | 476.92 | | | $ | 376.17 | | | $ | 4,302.64 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
List of Eligible Assistance Groups (AGs) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Healthy Families: - MA-C Categorically eligible due to TANF cash | | | | | |
- MA-T Children under 21 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- MA-Y Transitional Medicaid | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Healthy Start: - MA-P Pregnant Women and Children | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
For the SFY 2009 contract period, MCPs will be put at-risk for a portion of the premiums received for members in regions they served as of January 1, 2006, provided the MCP has participated in the program for more than twenty-four months. MCPs will be put at-risk for a portion of the premiums received for members in regions they began serving after January 1, 2006, beginning with the MCP's twenty-fifth month of membership in each region. The at-risk amount will be determined separately for each region an MCP serves. WellCare's regions at risk: Northeast | | | | | | | | | |
Appendix F
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
APPENDIX F | |
REGIONAL RATES | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2. AT-RISK AMOUNTS FOR 12/01/08 THROUGH 12/31/08 SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: | |
An at-risk amount of 1% is applied to the MCP rates. The status of the at-risk amount is determined in accordance with Appendix O, performance incentives. | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
MCP: WellCare of Ohio, Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SERVICE | REGIONAL | �� | HF/HST | | | HF/HST | | | HF/HST | | | HF/HST | | | HF/HST | | | HF | | | HF | | | HF | | | HST | | | Delivery | |
ENROLLMENT | STATUS | | Age < 1 | | | Age 1 | | | Age 2-13 | | | Age 14-18 | | | Age 14-18 | | | Age 19-44 | | | Age 19-44 | | | Age 45 | | | Age 19-64 | | | Payment | |
AREA | | | | | | | | | | | | Male | | | Female | | | Male | | | Female | | | and over | | | Female | | | | |
Northeast | Mandatory | | $ | 5.33 | | | $ | 1.38 | | | $ | 0.92 | | | $ | 1.10 | | | $ | 1.54 | | | $ | 1.89 | | | $ | 2.88 | | | $ | 4.55 | | | $ | 3.59 | | | $ | 41.05 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
List of Eligible Assistance Groups (AGs) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Healthy Families: - MA-C Categorically eligible due to TANF cash | | | | | |
- MA-T Children under 21 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- MA-Y Transitional Medicaid | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Healthy Start: - MA-P Pregnant Women and Children | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
For the SFY 2009 contract period, MCPs will be put at-risk for a portion of the premiums received for members in regions they served as of January 1, 2006, provided the MCP has participated in the program for more than twenty-four months. | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
MCPs will be put at-risk for a portion of the premiums received for members in regions they began serving after January 1, 2006, beginning with the MCP's twenty-fifth month of membership in each region. The at-risk amount will be determined separately for each region an MCP serves. WellCare's regions at risk: Northeast. | | | | | |
Appendix F
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
APPENDIX F | |
REGIONAL RATES | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
3. PREMIUM RATES FOR 12/01/08 THROUGH 12/31/08 SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: | |
An at-risk amount of 1% is applied to the MCP rates. The status of the at-risk amount is determined in accordance with Appendix O, performance incentives. | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
MCP: WellCare of Ohio, Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SERVICE | REGIONAL | | HF/HST | | | HF/HST | | | HF/HST | | | HF/HST | | | HF/HST | | | HF | | | HF | | | HF | | | HST | | | Delivery | |
ENROLLMENT | STATUS | | Age < 1 | | | Age 1 | | | Age 2-13 | | | Age 14-18 | | | Age 14-18 | | | Age 19-44 | | | Age 19-44 | | | Age 45 | | | Age 19-64 | | | Payment | |
AREA | | | | | | | | | | | | Male | | | Female | | | Male | | | Female | | | and over | | | Female | | | | |
Northeast | Mandatory | | $ | 564.33 | | | $ | 145.58 | | | $ | 97.58 | | | $ | 116.25 | | | $ | 162.70 | | | $ | 200.14 | | | $ | 304.84 | | | $ | 481.47 | | | $ | 379.76 | | | $ | 4,343.69 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
List of Eligible Assistance Groups (AGs) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Healthy Families: - MA-C Categorically eligible due to TANF cash | | | | | |
- MA-T Children under 21 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- MA-Y Transitional Medicaid | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Healthy Start: - MA-P Pregnant Women and Children | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
For the SFY 2009 contract period, MCPs will be put at-risk for a portion of the premiums received for members in regions they served as of January 1, 2006, provided the MCP has participated in the program for more than twenty-four months. | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
MCPs will be put at-risk for a portion of the premiums received for members in regions they began serving after January 1, 2006, beginning with the MCP's twenty-fifth month of membership in each region. The at-risk amount will be determined separately for each region an MCP serves. WellCare's regions at risk: Northeast. | | | | | | | | | |
Appendix G
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
APPENDIX G
COVERAGE AND SERVICES
CFC ELIGIBLE POPULATION
1. Basic Benefit Package
Pursuant to OAC rule 5101:3-26-03(A), with limited exclusions (see section G.2 of this appendix), MCPs must ensure that members have access to medically-necessary services covered by the Ohio Medicaid fee-for-service (FFS) program. For information on Medicaid-covered services, MCPs must refer to the ODJFS website. The following is a general list of the benefits covered by the Ohio Medicaid fee-for-service program:
| · | Inpatient hospital services |
| · | Outpatient hospital services |
| · | Rural health clinics (RHCs) and Federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) |
| · | Physician services whether furnished in the physician’s office, the covered person’s home, a hospital, or elsewhere |
| · | Laboratory and x-ray services |
| · | Screening, diagnosis, and treatment services to children under the age of twenty-one (21) under the HealthChek (EPSDT) program |
| · | Family planning services and supplies |
| · | Home health and private duty nursing services |
| · | Physical therapy, occupational therapy, developmental therapy and speech therapy |
| · | Nurse-midwife, certified family nurse practitioner, and certified pediatric nurse practitioner services |
| · | Ambulance and ambulette services |
Appendix G
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
| · | Durable medical equipment and medical supplies |
| · | Vision care services, including eyeglasses |
| · | Nursing facility stays as specified in OAC rule 5101:3-26-03 |
| · | Behavioral health services (see section G.2.b.iii of this appendix) |
2. Exclusions, Limitations and Clarifications
a. Exclusions
MCPs are not required to pay for Ohio Medicaid FFS program (Medicaid) non-covered services. For information regarding Medicaid noncovered
services, MCPs must refer to the ODJFS website. The following is a general list of the services not covered by the Ohio Medicaid fee-for-service program:
| · | Services or supplies that are not medically necessary |
| · | Experimental services and procedures, including drugs and equipment, not covered by Medicaid |
| · | Organ transplants that are not covered by Medicaid |
| · | Abortions, except in the case of a reported rape, incest, or when medically necessary to save the life of the mother |
| · | Infertility services for males or females |
| · | Voluntary sterilization if under 21 years of age or legally incapable of consenting to the procedure |
| · | Reversal of voluntary sterilization procedures |
| · | Plastic or cosmetic surgery that is not medically necessary* |
| · | Immunizations for travel outside of the United States |
| · | Services for the treatment of obesity unless medically necessary* |
· Custodial or supportive care not covered by Medicaid
| · | Sex change surgery and related services |
Appendix G
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
| · | Sexual or marriage counseling |
| · | Acupuncture and biofeedback services |
| · | Services to find cause of death (autopsy) |
| · | Comfort items in the hospital (e.g., TV or phone) |
MCPs are also not required to pay for non-emergency services or supplies received without members following the directions in their MCP member
handbook, unless otherwise directed by ODJFS.
| *These services could be deemed medically necessary if medical complications/conditions in addition to the obesity or physical imperfection are present. |
b. Limitations & Clarifications
i. Member Cost-Sharing
As specified in OAC rules 5101:3-26-05(D) and 5101:3-26-12, MCPs are permitted to impose the applicable member co-payment amount(s) for dental services, vision services, non-emergency emergency department services, or prescription drugs, other than generic drugs. MCPs must notify ODJFS if they intend to impose a co-payment. ODJFS must approve the notice to be sent to the MCP’s members and the timing of when the co-payments will begin to be imposed. If ODJFS determines that an MCP’s decision to impose a particular co-payment on their members would constitute a significant change for those members, ODJFS may require the effective date of the co-payment to coincide with the “Open Enrollment” month.
Notwithstanding the preceding paragraph, MCPs must provide an ODJFS-approved notice to all their members 90 days in advance of the date that the MCP will impose the co-payment. With the exception of member co-payments the MCP has elected to implement in accordance with OAC rules 5101:3-26-05(D) and 5101:3-26-12, the MCP’s payment constitutes payment in full for any covered services and their subcontractors must not charge members or ODJFS any additional co-payment, cost sharing, down-payment, or similar charge, refundable or otherwise.
Appendix G
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
ii. Abortion and Sterilization
The use of federal funds to pay for abortion and sterilization services is prohibited unless the specific criteria found in 42 CFR 441 and OAC rules 5101:3-17-01 and 5101:3-21-01 are met. MCPs must verify that all of the information on the required forms (JFS 03197, 03198, and 03199) is provided and that the service meets the required criteria before any such claim is paid.
Additionally, payment must not be made for associated services such as anesthesia, laboratory tests, or hospital services if the abortion or sterilization itself does not qualify for payment. MCPs are responsible for educating their providers on the requirements; implementing internal procedures including systems edits to ensure that claims are only paid once the MCP has determined if the applicable forms are completed and the required criteria are met, as confirmed by the appropriate certification/consent forms; and for maintaining documentation to justify any such claim payments.
iii. Behavioral Health Services
Coordination of Services: MCPs must have a process to coordinate benefits of and referrals to the publicly funded community behavioral health system. MCPs must ensure that members have access to all medically-necessary behavioral health services covered by the Ohio Medicaid FFS program and are responsible for coordinating those services with other medical and support services. MCPs must notify members via the member handbook and provider directory of where and how to access behavioral health services, including the ability to self-refer to mental health services offered through ODMH community mental health centers (CMHCs) as well as substance abuse services offered through Ohio Department of Alcohol and Drug Addiction Services (ODADAS)-certified Medicaid providers. Pursuant to ORC Section 5111.16, alcohol, drug addiction and mental health services covered by Medicaid are not to be paid by the managed care program when the nonfederal share of the cost of those services is provided by a board of alcohol, drug addiction, and mental health services or a state agency other than ODJFS. MCPs are also not responsible for providing mental health services to persons between 22 and 64 years of age while residing in an institution for mental disease (IMD) as defined in Section 1905(i) of the Social Security Act.
MCPs must provide Medicaid-covered behavioral health services for members who are unable to timely access services or are unwilling to access services through community providers.
Appendix G
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
Mental Health Services: There are a number of Medicaid-covered mental health (MH) services available through ODMH CMHCs.
Where an MCP is responsible for providing MH services for their members, the MCP is responsible for ensuring access to counseling and psychotherapy, physician/psychologist/psychiatrist services, outpatient clinic services, general hospital outpatient psychiatric services, pre-hospitalization screening, diagnostic assessment (clinical evaluation), crisis intervention, psychiatric hospitalization in general hospitals (for all ages), and Medicaid-covered prescription drugs and laboratory services. MCPs are not required to cover partial hospitalization, or inpatient psychiatric care in a private or public free-standing psychiatric hospital. However, MCPs are required to cover the payment of physician services in a private or public free-standing psychiatric hospital when such services are billed independent of the hospital. The payment of physician services in an IMD is also covered by the MCPs, as long as the member is 21 years of age and under or 65 years of age and older.
Substance Abuse Services: There are a number of Medicaid-covered substance abuse services available through ODADAS-certified Medicaid providers.
Where an MCP is responsible for providing substance abuse services for their members, the MCP is responsible for ensuring access to alcohol and other drug (AOD) urinalysis screening, assessment, counseling, physician/psychologist/psychiatrist AOD treatment services, outpatient clinic AOD treatment services, general hospital outpatient AOD treatment services, crisis intervention, inpatient detoxification services in a general hospital, and Medicaid-covered prescription drugs and laboratory services. MCPs are not required to cover outpatient detoxification, intensive outpatient programs (IOP)(substance abuse) or methadone maintenance.
Financial Responsibility for Behavioral Health Services: MCPs are responsible for the following:
| · | payment of Medicaid-covered prescription drugs prescribed by an ODMH CMHC or ODADAS-certified provider when obtained through an MCP’s panel pharmacy; |
| · | payment of Medicaid-covered services provided by an MCP’s panel laboratory when referred by an ODMH CMHC or ODADAS-certified provider; |
| · | payment of all other Medicaid-covered behavioral health services obtained through providers other than those who are ODMH CMHCs or ODADAS-certified providers when arranged/authorized by the MCP. |
Appendix G
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
Limitations:
| · | Pursuant to ORC Section 5111.16, alcohol, drug addiction and mental health services covered by Medicaid are not to be paid by the managed care program when the nonfederal share of the cost of those services is provided by a board of alcohol, drug addiction, and mental health services or a state agency other than ODJFS. As part of this limitation: |
| · | MCPs are not responsible for paying for behavioral health services provided through ODMH CMHCs and ODADAS-certified Medicaid providers; |
| · | MCPs are not responsible for payment of partial hospitalization (mental health), inpatient psychiatric care in a private or public free-standing inpatient psychiatric hospital, outpatient detoxification, intensive outpatient programs (IOP) (substance abuse) or methadone maintenance. |
| · | However, MCPs are required to cover the payment of physician services in a private or public free-standing psychiatric hospital when such services are billed independent of the hospital. |
| iv. | Pharmacy Benefit: In providing the Medicaid pharmacy benefit to their members, MCPs must cover the same drugs covered by the Ohio Medicaid fee-for-service program, in accordance with OAC rule 5101:3-26-03(A) and (B). |
| Pursuant to ORC Section 5111.172, MCPs may, subject to ODJFS approval, implement strategies for the management of drug utilization. (see appendix G.3.a). |
| v. | Organ Transplants: MCPs must ensure coverage for organ transplants and related services in accordance with OAC 5101-3-2-07.1 (B)(4)& (5). Coverage for all organ transplant services, except kidney transplants, is contingent upon review and recommendation by the “Ohio Solid Organ Transplant Consortium” based on criteria established by Ohio organ transplant surgeons and authorization from the ODJFS prior authorization unit. Reimbursement for bone marrow transplant and hematapoietic stem cell transplant services, as defined in OAC 3701:84-01, is contingent upon review and recommendation by the “Ohio Hematapoietic Stem Cell Transplant Consortium” again based on criteria established by Ohio experts in the field of bone marrow transplant. While MCPs may require prior authorization for these transplant services, the approval criteria would be limited to confirming the consumer is being considered and/or has been recommended for a transplant by either consortium and authorized by ODJFS. Additionally, in accordance with OAC 5101:3-2-03 (A)(4) all services related to organ donations are covered for the donor recipient when the consumer is Medicaid eligible. |
Appendix G
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
a. Utilization Management Programs
General Provisions - Pursuant to OAC rule 5101:3-26-03.1(A)(7), MCPs must implement a utilization management (UM) program to maximize the
effectiveness of the care provided to members and may develop other UM programs, subject to prior approval by ODJFS. For the purposes of this
requirement, the specific UM programs which require ODJFS prior-approval are an MCP’s general pharmacy program, a controlled substances and member
management program, and any other program designed by the MCP with the purpose of redirecting or restricting access to a particular service or service
location.
| i. | Pharmacy Programs - Pursuant to ORC Sec. 5111.172, MCPs may, subject to ODJFS prior-approval, implement strategies for the management of drug utilization. Pharmacy utilization management strategies may include developing preferred drug lists, requiring prior authorization for certain drugs, placing limitations on the type of provider and locations where certain medications may be administered, and developing and implementing a specialized pharmacy program to address the utilization of controlled substances, as defined in section 3719.01 of the Ohio Revised Code. MCPs may also implement a retrospective drug utilization review program designed to promote the appropriate clinical prescribing of covered drugs. | |
Drug Prior Authorizations: MCPs must receive prior approval from ODJFS for the medications that they wish to cover through prior authorization. MCPs must establish their prior authorization system so that it does not unnecessarily impede member access to medically-necessary Medicaid-covered services. MCPs must make their approved list of drugs covered only with prior authorization available to members and providers, as outlined in paragraphs 37(b) and (c) of Appendix C.
While MCPs may, with ODJFS approval, require prior authorization for the coverage of 2nd generation antipsychotic drugs, MCPs must allow any member to continue receiving a specific 2nd generation antipsychotic drug if the member is stabilized on that particular medication. The MCP must continue to cover that specific antipsychotic for the stabilized member for as long as that medication continues to be effective for the member. MCPs must also collaborate with ODJFS in the retrospective review of 2nd generation antipsychotic utilization.
Appendix G
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
MCPs must comply with the provisions of 1927(d)(5) of the Social Security Act, 42 USC 1396r-8(k)(3), and OAC rule 5101:3-26-03.1 regarding the timeframes for prior authorization of covered outpatient drugs.
Controlled Substances and Member Management Programs: MCPs may also, with ODJFS prior approval, develop and implement Controlled Substances and Member Management (CSMM) programs designed to address use of controlled substances. Utilization management strategies may include prior authorization as a condition of obtaining a controlled substance, as defined in section 3719.01 of the Ohio Revised Code. CSMM strategies may also include processes for requiring MCP members at high risk for fraud or abuse involving controlled substances to have their controlled substances prescribed by a designated provider/providers and filled by a pharmacy, medical provider, or health care facility designated by the program.
| ii. | Emergency Department Diversion (EDD) – MCPs must provide access to services in a way that assures access to primary, specialist and urgent care in the most appropriate settings and that minimizes frequent, preventable utilization of emergency department (ED) services. OAC rule 5101:3-26-03.1(A)(7)(d) requires MCPs to implement the ODJFS-required emergency department diversion (EDD) program for frequent utilizers. |
Each MCP must establish an ED diversion (EDD) program with the goal of minimizing frequent ED utilization. The MCP’s EDD program must include the monitoring of ED utilization, identification of frequent ED utilizers, and targeted approaches designed to reduce avoidable ED utilization. MCP EDD programs must, at a minimum, address those ED visits which could have been prevented through improved education, access, quality or care management approaches.
Although there is often an assumption that frequent ED visits are solely the result of a preference on the part of the member and education is therefore the standard remedy, it is also important to ensure that a member’s frequent ED utilization is not due to problems such as their PCP’s lack of accessibility or failure to make appropriate specialist referrals. The MCP’s EDD program must therefore also include the identification of providers who serve as PCPs for a substantial number of frequent ED utilizers and the implementation of corrective action with these providers as so indicated.
| | This requirement does not replace the MCP’s responsibility to inform and educate all members regarding the appropriate use of the ED. |
Appendix G
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
b. Care Management Programs
In accordance with 5101:3-26-03.1(A)(8), MCPs must offer and provide care management services which coordinate and monitor the care of members who require high-cost and/or extensive services. The MCP’s care management program must also include a Children with Special Health Care Needs component as specified below.
| i. | Each MCP must inform all members and contracting providers of the MCP’s care management services. |
| ii. | Children with Special Health Care Needs (CSHCN): |
CSHCN are a particularly vulnerable population which often have chronic and complex medical health care conditions. In order to ensure compliance with the provisions of 42 CFR 438.208, each MCP must establish a CSHCN component as part of the MCP’s care management program. The MCP must establish a process for the timely identification, completion of a comprehensive health assessment, and providing appropriate care management services for any CSHCN.
CSHCN are defined as children age 17 and under who are pregnant, and members under 21 years of age with one or more of the following:
-Asthma
-HIV/AIDS
-A chronic physical, emotional or mental condition for which they are receiving treatment or counseling
-Supplemental security income (SSI) for a health-related condition
-A current letter of approval from the Bureau of Children with Medical Handicaps (BCMH), Ohio Department of Health
Appendix G
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
| iii. | Care Management Program |
| 1. | The MCP must have a process to inform members and their PCPs in writing that they have been identified as meeting the criteria for care management, including their enrollment into a care management program. |
| 2. | The MCP must assure and coordinate the placement of the member into care management – including identification of the member’s need for care management services, completion of the comprehensive health assessment, and timely development of a care treatment plan. This process must occur within the following timeframes for: |
a) newly enrolled members, 90 days from the effective date of enrollment; and
b) existing members, 90 days from identifying their need for care management.
| 3. | The MCP’s care management program must include, at a minimum, the following components: |
The MCP must have a variety of mechanisms in place to identify members potentially eligible for care management. These mechanisms must include an administrative data review (e.g., diagnosis, cost threshold, and/or service utilization) and may include provider/self referrals, telephone interviews, information as reported by MCEC during membership selection, or home visits.
| The MCP must arrange for or conduct an initial comprehensive health assessment to confirm the results of a positive identification, and determine the need for care management services. |
The comprehensive health assessment must evaluate the member’s medical condition(s), including physical, behavioral, social, and psychological needs. The comprehensive health assessment must also evaluate if the member has co-morbidities, or multiple complex health care conditions. The goals of the assessment are to identify the member’s existing and/or potential health care needs and assess the member’s need for care management services.
Appendix G
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
The assessment must be completed by a physician, physician assistant, RN, LPN, licensed social worker, or a graduate of a two- or four-year allied health program. If the assessment is completed by a physician assistant, LPN, licensed social worker, or a graduate of a two- or four-year allied health program, there should be oversight and monitoring by either a registered nurse or physician.
The MCP must develop a strategy to assign members to risk stratification levels, based on the member’s comprehensive health assessment.
The care treatment plan is defined by ODJFS as the one developed by the MCP for the member. The development of the care treatment plan must be based on the comprehensive health assessment, and reflect the member’s medical condition(s), including physical, behavioral, social, and psychological needs, as well as co-morbidities. The care treatment plan must also include specific provisions for periodic reviews of the member's health care needs. Periodic reviews may include administrative data reviews or screening questions to alert appropriately qualified MCP staff to update the comprehensive health assessment and the care treatment plan. At a minimum, there must be verbal/written contact with the member once every six (6) months. The MCP must ensure there is a provision for two-way communication or feedback with the MCP.
The member and the member's PCP must be actively involved in the development of, and revisions to, the care treatment plan. The designated PCP is the provider, or specialist, who will manage and coordinate the overall care for the member. Ongoing communication regarding the status of the care treatment plan may be accomplished between the MCP and the PCP's designee (i.e., qualified health professional). Revisions to the clinical portion of the care treatment plan should be completed in consultation with the PCP.
The elements of a care treatment plan include:
Goals and actions that address health care conditions identified in the comprehensive health assessment;
Member level interventions (i.e., referrals and making appointments) that assist members in obtaining services, providers and programs related to the health care conditions identified in the comprehensive health assessment;
Appendix G
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
Continuous review, revision and contact follow-up, as needed,to insure the care treatment plan is adequately monitored including the following:
| · | Documentation that services are provided in accordance with the care treatment plan; |
| · | Re-evaluation to determine if the care treatment plan is adequate to meet the member's health care needs; |
| · | Identification of gaps between recommended care and actual care provided; |
| · | A change in needs or status from the re-evaluation that requires revisions to the care treatment plan; and |
| · | Re-evaluation of a member's risk level with adjustment to the level of care management services provided. |
4. Coordination of Care and Communication
The MCP must provide care management services for:
| · | all CSHCN, including the ODJFS mandated conditions as specified in Appendix M, Care Management Program Performance Measures; |
| · | all members enrolled in an MCP’s CSMM program as specified in Section G(3)(a)(i); and |
· adults whose health conditions warrant care management services.
Care management services should not be limited only to members with the mandated conditions.
There should be an accountable point of contact (i.e., case manager) who can help obtain medically necessary care, assist with health-related services and coordinate care needs. The MCP must arrange or provide for professional care management services that are performed collaboratively by a team of professionals appropriate for the member’s condition and health care needs. At a minimum, the MCP’s care manager must attempt to coordinate with the member’s care manager from other health systems. The MCP must have a process to facilitate, maintain, and coordinate communication between service providers, the member, and the member’s family. The MCP must have a provision to disseminate information to the member/caregiver concerning the health condition, types of services that may be available, and how to access the services.
Appendix G
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
The MCP must implement mechanisms to notify all Members with Special Health Care Needs of their right to directly access a specialist. Such access may be assured through, for example, a standing referral or an approved number of visits, and documented in the care treatment plan.
iv. Care Management Strategies
The MCP must follow best-practice and/or evidence based clinical guidelines when developing a member’s care treatment plan and coordinating the care management needs. The MCP must develop and implement mechanisms to educate and equip providers and care managers with evidence-based clinical guidelines or best practice approaches to assist in providing a high level of quality of care to members.
v. Care Management Program Staffing
The MCP must identify the staff that will be involved in the operations of the care management program, including but not limited to: care manager supervisors, care manager, and administrative support staff. The MCP must identify the role and functions of each care management staff member as well as the educational requirements, clinical licensure standards, certification and relevant experience with care management standards and/or activities. The MCP must provide care manager staff/member ratios based on the member risk stratification and different levels of care being provided to members.
vi. Care Management Data Submission
The MCP must submit a monthly electronic report to the Care Management System (CAMS) for all members who are provided care management services by the MCP as outlined in the ODJFS Case Management File and Submission Specifications.In order for a member to be submitted as care managed in CAMS, the MCP must (1) complete the identification process, a comprehensive health assessment and development of a care treatment plan for the member; and (2) document the member’s written or verbal confirmation of his/her care management status in the care management record. ODJFS, or its designated entity, the external quality review vendor, will validate on an annual basis the accuracy of the information contained in CAMS with the member’s care management record.
Appendix G
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
The CAMS files are due the 15th calendar day of each month.
| The MCP must also have an ODJFS-approved care management program which includes the items in Section 3.b.. Each MCP should implement an evaluation process to review, revise and/or update the care management program. The MCP must annually submit its care management program for review and approval by ODJFS. Any subsequent changes to an approved care management program description must be submitted to ODJFS in writing for review and approval prior to implementation. |
c. Care Coordination with ODJFS-Designated Providers
Per OAC rule 5101:3-26-03.1(A)(4), MCPs are required to share specific information with certain ODJFS-designated non-contracting providers in order to ensure that these providers have been supplied with specific information needed to coordinate care for the MCP’s members. Once an MCP has obtained a provider agreement, but within the first month of operation, the MCP must provide to the ODJFS-designated providers (i.e., ODMH Community Mental Health Centers, ODADAS-certified Medicaid providers, FQHCs/RHCs, QFPPs, CNMs, CNPs [if applicable], and hospitals) a quick reference information packet which includes the following:
| i. | A brief cover letter explaining the purpose of the mailing; and |
| ii. | A brief summary document that includes the following information: |
| · | Claims submission information including the MCP’s Medicaid provider number for each region; |
| · | The MCP’s prior authorization and referral procedures or the MCP’s website which includes this information; |
Appendix G
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
| · | A picture of the MCP’s member identification card (front and back); |
| · | Contact numbers and website location for obtaining information for eligibility verification, claims processing, referrals/prior authorization, and information regarding the MCP’s behavioral health administrator; |
| · | A listing of the MCP’s major pharmacy chains and the contact number for the MCP’s pharmacy benefit administrator (PBM); |
| · | A listing of the MCP’s laboratories and radiology providers; and |
| · | A listing of the MCP’s contracting behavioral health providers and how to access services through them (this information is only to be provided to non-contracting community mental health and substance abuse providers). |
d. Care coordination with Non-Contracting Providers
| Per OAC rule 5101:3-26-05(A)(9), MCPs authorizing the delivery of services from a provider who does not have an executed subcontract must ensure that they have a mutually agreed upon compensation amount for the authorized service and notify the provider of the applicable provisions of paragraph D of OAC rule 5101:3-26-05. This notice is provided when an MCP authorizes a non-contracting provider to furnish services on a one-time or infrequent basis to an MCP member and must include required ODJFS-model language and information. This notice must also be included with the transition of services form sent to providers as outlined in paragraph 29.h of Appendix C. |
e. Integration of Member Care
| The MCP must ensure that a discharge plan is in place to meet a member’s health care needs following discharge from a nursing facility, and integrated into the member's continuum of care. The discharge plan must address the services to be provided for the member and must be developed prior to the date of discharge from the nursing facility. The MCP must ensure follow-up contact occurs with the member, or authorized representative, within thirty (30) days of the member’s discharge from the nursing facility to ensure that the member’s health care needs are being met. |
Appendix H
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
APPENDIX H
PROVIDER PANEL SPECIFICATIONS
CFC ELIGIBLE POPULATION
MCPs must provide or arrange for the delivery of all medically necessary, Medicaid-covered health services, as well as assure that they meet all applicable provider panel requirements for their entire designated service area. The ODJFS provider panel requirements are specified in the charts included with this appendix and must be met prior to the MCP receiving a provider agreement with ODJFS. The MCP must remain in compliance with these requirements for the duration of the provider agreement.
If an MCP is unable to provide the medically necessary, Medicaid-covered services through their contracted provider panel, the MCP must ensure access to these services on an as needed basis. For example, if an MCP meets the pediatrician requirement but a member is unable to obtain a timely appointment from a pediatrician on the MCP’s provider panel, the MCP will be required to secure an appointment from a panel pediatrician or arrange for an out-of-panel referral to a pediatrician.
MCPs are required to make transportation available to any member requesting transportation when they must travel 30 miles or more from their home to receive a medically-necessary Medicaid-covered service. If the MCP offers transportation to their members as an additional benefit and this transportation benefit only covers a limited number of trips, the required transportation listed above may not be counted toward this trip limit (as specified in Appendix C).
In developing the provider panel requirements, ODJFS considered, on a county-by-county basis, the population size and utilization patterns of the Covered Families and Children (CFC) consumers, as well as the potential availability of the designated provider types. ODJFS has integrated existing utilization patterns into the provider network requirements to avoid disruption of care. Most provider panel requirements are county-specific but in certain circumstances, ODJFS requires providers to be located anywhere in the region. Although all provider types listed in this appendix are required provider types, only those listed on the attached charts must be submitted for ODJFS prior approval.
2. PROVIDER SUBCONTRACTING
Unless otherwise specified in this appendix or OAC rule 5101:3-26-05, all MCPs are required to enter into fully-executed subcontracts with their providers. These subcontracts must include a baseline contractual agreement, as well as the appropriate ODJFS-approved Model Medicaid Addendum. The Model Medicaid Addendum incorporates all applicable Ohio Administrative Code rule requirements specific to provider subcontracting and therefore cannot be modified except to add personalizing information such as the MCP’s name.
Appendix H
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
��
ODJFS must prior approve all MCP providers in the ODJFS- required provider type categories before they can begin to provide services to that MCP’s members. MCPs may not employ or contract with providers excluded from participation in Federal health care programs under either section 1128 or section 1128A of the Social Security Act. As part of the prior approval process, MCPs must submit documentation verifying that all necessary contract documents have been appropriately completed. ODJFS will verify the approvability of the submission and process this information using the ODJFS Provider Verification System (PVS) or other designated process. The PVS is a centralized database system that maintains information on the status of all MCP-submitted providers.
Only those providers who meet the applicable criteria specified in this document, as determined by ODJFS, will be approved by ODJFS. MCPs must credential/recredential providers in accordance with the standards specified by the National Committee for Quality Assurance (or receive approval from ODJFS to use an alternate industry standard) and must have completed the credentialing review before submitting any provider to ODJFS for approval. Regardless of whether ODJFS has approved a provider, the MCP must ensure that the provider has met all applicable credentialing criteria before the provider can render services to the MCP’s members.
MCPs must notify ODJFS of the addition and deletion of their contracting providers as specified in OAC rule 5101:3-26-05, and must notify ODJFS within one working day in instances where the MCP has identified that they are not in compliance with the provider panel requirements specified in this appendix.
3. PROVIDER PANEL REQUIREMENTS
The provider network criteria that must be met by each MCP are as follows:
a. Primary Care Providers (PCPs)
Primary Care Provider (PCP) means an individual physician (M.D. or D.O.), certain physician group practice/clinic (Primary Care Clinics [PCCs]), or an advanced practice nurse (APN) as defined in ORC 4723.43 or advanced practice nurse group practice within an acceptable specialty, contracting with an MCP to provide services as specified in paragraph (B) of OAC rule 5101: 3-26-03.1. The APN capacity can count up to 10% of the total requirement for the county. Acceptable specialty types for PCPs include family/general practice, internal medicine, pediatrics, and obstetrics/gynecology (OB/GYN). Acceptable PCCs include FQHCs, RHCs and the acceptable group practices/clinics specified by ODJFS. As part of their subcontract with an MCP, PCPs must stipulate the total Medicaid member capacity that they can ensure for that individual MCP.
Appendix H
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
Each PCP must have the capacity and agree to serve at least 50 Medicaid members at each practice site in order to be approved by ODJFS as a PCP. The capacity-by-site requirement must be met for all ODJFS-approved PCPs.
In determining whether an MCP has sufficient PCP capacity for a region, ODJFS considers a provider who can serve as a PCP for 2000 Medicaid MCP members as one full-time equivalent (FTE).
ODJFS reviews the capacity totals for each PCP to determine if they appear excessive. ODJFS reserves the right to request clarification from an MCP for any PCP whose total stated capacity for all MCP networks added together exceeds 2000 Medicaid members (i.e., 1 FTE) where indicated, ODJFS may set a cap on the maximum amount of capacity that we will recognize for a specific PCP. ODJFS may allow up to an additional 750 member capacity for each nurse practitioner or physician’s assistant that is used to provide clinical support for a PCP.
For PCPs contracting with more than one MCP, the MCP must ensure that the capacity figure stated by the PCP in their subcontract reflects only the capacity the PCP intends to provide for that one MCP. ODJFS utilizes each approved PCP’s capacity figure to determine if an MCP meets the provider panel requirements and this stated capacity figure does not prohibit a PCP from actually having a caseload that exceeds the capacity figure indicated in their subcontract.
ODJFS recognizes that MCPs will need to utilize specialty providers to serve as PCPs for some special needs members. Also, in some situations (e.g., continuity of care) a PCP may only want to serve a very small number of members for an MCP. In these situations it will not be necessary for the MCP to submit these PCPs to ODJFS for prior approval. These PCPs will not be included in the ODJFS PVS database, or other designated process, and therefore may not appear as PCPs in the MCP’s provider directory. These PCPs will, however, need to execute a subcontract with the MCP which includes the appropriate Model Medicaid Addendum.
The PCP requirement is based on an MCP having sufficient PCP capacity to serve 40% of the eligibles in the region if three MCPs are serving the region and 55% of the eligibles in the region if two MCPs are serving the region. At a minimum, each MCP must meet both the PCP FTE requirement for that region, and a ratio of one PCP FTE for each 2,000 of their Medicaid members in that region. MCPs must also satisfy a PCP geographic accessibility standard. ODJFS will match the PCP practice sites and the stated PCP capacity with the geographic location of the eligible population in that region (on a county-specific basis) and perform analysis using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) software. The analysis will be used to determine if at least 40% of the eligible population is located within 10 miles of PCP with available capacity in urban counties and 40% of the eligible population within 30 miles of a PCP with available capacity in rural counties. [Rural areas are defined pursuant to 42 CFR 412.62(f)(1)(iii).]
Appendix H
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
In addition to the PCP FTE capacity requirement, MCPs must also contract with the specified number of pediatric PCPs for each region. These pediatric PCPs will have their stated capacity counted toward the PCP FTE requirement.
A pediatric PCP must maintain a general pediatric practice (e.g., a pediatric neurologist would not meet this definition unless this physician also operated a practice as a general pediatrician) at a site(s) located within the county/region and be listed as a pediatrician with the Ohio State Medical Board. In addition, half of the required number of pediatric PCPs must also be certified by the American Board of Pediatrics. The provider panel requirements for pediatricians are included in the practitioner charts in this appendix.
b. Non-PCP Provider Network
In addition to the PCP capacity requirements, each MCP is also required to maintain adequate capacity in the remainder of its provider network within the following categories: hospitals, dentists, pharmacies, vision care providers, obstetricians/gynecologists (OB/GYNs), allergists, general surgeons, otolaryngologists, orthopedists, certified nurse midwives (CNMs), certified nurse practitioners (CNPs), federally qualified health centers (FQHCs)/rural health centers (RHCs) and qualified family planning providers (QFPPs). CNMs, CNPs, FQHCs/RHCs and QFPPs are federally-required provider types.
All Medicaid-contracting MCPs must provide all medically-necessary Medicaid-covered services to their members and therefore their complete provider network will include many other additional specialists and provider types. MCPs must ensure that all non-PCP network providers follow community standards in the scheduling of routine appointments (i.e., the amount of time members must wait from the time of their request to the first available time when the visit can occur).
Although there are currently no FTE capacity requirements of the non-PCP required provider types, MCPs are required to ensure that adequate access is available to members for all required provider types. Additionally, for certain non-PCP required provider types, MCPs must ensure that these providers maintain a full-time practice at a site(s) located in the specified county/region (i.e., the ODJFS-specified county within the region or anywhere within the region if no particular county is specified). A full-time practice is defined as one where the provider is available to patients at their practice site(s) in the specified county/region for at least 25 hours a week. ODJFS will monitor access to services through a variety of data sources, including: consumer satisfaction surveys; member appeals/grievances/complaints and state hearing notifications/requests; clinical quality studies; encounter data volume; provider complaints, and clinical performance measures.
Hospitals - MCPs must contract with the number and type of hospitals specified by ODJFS for each county/region. In developing these hospital requirements, ODJFS considered, on a county-by-county basis, the population size and utilization patterns of the Covered Families and Children (CFC) consumers and integrated the existing utilization patterns into the hospital network requirements to avoid disruption of care. For this reason, ODJFS may require that MCPs contract with out-of-state hospitals (i.e. Kentucky, West Virginia, etc.).
Appendix H
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
For each Ohio hospital, ODJFS utilizes the hospital’s most current Annual Hospital Registration and Planning Report, as filed with the Ohio Department of Health, in verifying types of services that hospital provides. Although ODJFS has the authority, under certain situations, to obligate a non-contracting hospital to provide non-emergency hospital services to an MCP’s members, MCPs must still contract with the specified number and type of hospitals unless ODJFS approves a provider panel exception (see Section 4 of this appendix – Provider Panel Exceptions).
If an MCP-contracted hospital elects not to provide specific Medicaid-covered hospital services because of an objection on moral or religious grounds, the MCP must ensure that these hospital services are available to its members through another MCP-contracted hospital in the specified county/region.
OB/GYNs - MCPs must contract with the specified number of OB/GYNs for each county/region, all of whom must maintain a full-time obstetrical practice at a site(s) located in the specified county/region. Only MCP-contracting OB/GYNs with current hospital privileges at a hospital under contract with the MCP in the region can be submitted to the PVS, or other system, count towards MCP minimum panel requirements, and be listed in the MCPs’ provider directory.
Certified Nurse Midwives (CNMs) and Certified Nurse Practitioners (CNPs) - MCPs must ensure access to CNM and CNP services in the region if such provider types are present within the region. The MCP may contract directly with the CNM or CNP providers, or with a physician or other provider entity who is able to obligate the participation of a CNM or CNP. If an MCP does not contract for CNM or CNP services and such providers are present within the region, the MCP will be required to allow members to receive CNM or CNP services outside of the MCP’s provider network.
Only CNMs with hospital delivery privileges at a hospital under contract with the MCP in the region can be submitted to the PVS, or other system, count towards MCP minimum panel requirements, and be listed in the MCPs’ provider directory.The MCP must ensure a member’s access to CNM and CNP services if such providers are practicing within the region.
Vision Care Providers - MCPs must contract with the specified number of ophthalmologists/optometrists for each specified county/region , all of whom must maintain a full-time practice at a site(s) located in the specified county/region. All ODJFS-approved vision providers must regularly perform routine eye exams. (MCPs will be expected to contract with an adequate number of ophthalmologists as part of their overall provider panel, but only ophthalmologists who regularly perform routine eye exams can be used to meet the vision care provider panel requirement.) If optical dispensing is not sufficiently available in a region through the MCP’s contracting ophthalmologists/optometrists, the MCP must separately contract with an adequate number of optical dispensers located in the region.
Appendix H
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
Dental Care Providers - MCPs must contract with the specified number of dentists. In order to assure sufficient access to adult MCP members, no more than two-thirds of the dentists used to meet the provider panel requirement may be pediatric dentists.
Federally Qualified Health Centers/Rural Health Clinics (FQHCs/RHCs) - MCPs are required to ensure member access to any federally qualified health center or rural health clinic (FQHCs/RHCs), regardless of contracting status. Contracting FQHC/RHC providers must be submitted for ODJFS approval via the PVS process, or other designated process. Even if no FQHC/RHC is available within the region, MCPs must have mechanisms in place to ensure coverage for FQHC/RHC services in the event that a member accesses these services outside of the region.
In order to ensure that any FQHC/RHC has the ability to submit a claim to ODJFS for the state’s supplemental payment, MCPs must offer FQHCs/RHCs reimbursement pursuant to the following:
| • | MCPs must provide expedited reimbursement on a service-specific basis in an amount no less than the payment made to other providers for the same or similar service. |
| • | If the MCP has no comparable service-specific rate structure, the MCP must use the regular Medicaid fee-for-service payment schedule for non-FQHC/RHC providers. |
| • | MCPs must make all efforts to pay FQHCs/RHCs as quickly as possible and not just attempt to pay these claims within the prompt pay time frames. |
MCPs are required to educate their staff and providers on the need to assure member access to FQHC/RHC services.
Qualified Family Planning Providers (QFPPs) - All MCP members must be permitted to self-refer to family planning services provided by a QFPP. A QFPP is defined as any public or not-for-profit health care provider that complies with Title X guidelines/standards, and receives either Title X funding or family planning funding from the Ohio Department of Health. MCPs must reimburse all medically-necessary Medicaid-covered family planning services provided to eligible members by a QFPP provider (including on-site pharmacy and diagnostic services) on a patient self-referral basis, regardless of the provider’s status as a panel or non-panel provider.
MCPs will be required to work with QFPPs in the region to develop mutually-agreeable HIPAA compliant policies and procedures to preserve patient/provider confidentiality, and convey pertinent information to the member’s PCP and/or MCP.
Appendix H
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
Behavioral Health Providers – MCPs must assure member access to all Medicaid-covered behavioral health services for members as specified in Appendix G.b.ii. Although ODJFS is aware that certain outpatient substance abuse services may only be available through Medicaid providers certified by the Ohio Department of Drug and Alcohol Addiction Services (ODADAS) in some areas, MCPs must maintain an adequate number of contracted mental health providers in the region to assure access for members who are unable to timely access services or unwilling to access services through community mental health centers. MCPs are advised not to contract with community mental health centers as all services they provide to MCP members are to be billed to ODJFS.
Other Specialty Types (pediatricians, general surgeons, otolaryngologists, allergists, andorthopedists) - MCPs must contract with the specified number of all other ODJFS designated specialty provider types. In order to be counted toward meeting the provider panel requirements, these specialty providers must maintain a full-time practice at a site(s) located within the specified county/region. Only contracting general surgeons, orthopedists, and otolaryngologists with admitting privileges at a hospital under contract with the MCP in the region can be submitted to the PVS, or other system, count towards MCP minimum panel requirements, and be listed in the MCPs’ provider directory.
4. PROVIDER PANEL EXCEPTIONS
ODJFS may specify provider panel criteria for a service area that deviates from that specified in this appendix if:
| - | the MCP presents sufficient documentation to ODJFS to verify that they have been unable to meet or maintain certain provider panel requirements in a particular service area despite all reasonable efforts on their part to secure such a contract(s), and |
| - | if notified by ODJFS, the provider(s) in question fails to provide a reasonable argument why they would not contract with the MCP, and |
- the MCP presents sufficient assurances to ODJFS that their members will have adequate access to the services in question.
If an MCP is unable to contract with or maintain a sufficient number of providers to meet the ODJFS-specified provider panel criteria, the MCP may request an exception to these criteria by submitting a provider panel exception request as specified by ODJFS. ODJFS will review the exception request and determine whether the MCP has sufficiently demonstrated that all
reasonable efforts were made to obtain contracts with providers of the type in question and that they will be able to provide access to the services in question.
Appendix H
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
A provider panel exception request (PPE) may be approved for a period of not more than one year. Approvals shall have an effective date of the 1st day of the month in which the PPE is approved by ODJFS. ODJFS will not accept or review a request to extend the effective date of a PPE that is submitted earlier than 15 calendar days prior to the date of expiration. Once the MCP has resolved the deficiency, the PPE is no longer valid. If the MCP becomes deficient in the same area a new PPE request will need to be submitted prior to the next compliance review.
ODJFS will aggressively monitor access to all services related to the approval of a provider panel exception request through a variety of data sources, including: consumer satisfaction surveys; member appeals/grievances/complaints and state hearing notifications/requests; member just-cause for termination requests; clinical quality studies; encounter data volume; provider complaints, and clinical performance measures. ODJFS approval of a provider panel exception request does not exempt the MCP from assuring access to the services in question. If ODJFS determines that an MCP has not provided sufficient access to these services, the MCP may be subject to sanctions.
MCP provider directories must include all MCP-contracted providers [except as specified by ODJFS] as well as certain non-contracted providers. At the time of ODJFS’ review, the information listed in the MCP’s provider directory for all ODJFS-required provider types specified on the attached charts must exactly match the data currently on file in the ODJFS PVS, or other designated process.
MCP provider directories must utilize a format specified by ODJFS. Directories may be region-specific or include multiple regions, however, the providers within the directory must be divided by region, county, and provider type, in that order.
The directory must also specify:
| • | provider address(es) and phone number(s); |
| • | an explanation of how to access providers (e.g. referral required vs. self-referral); |
| • | an indication of which providers are available to members on a self-referral basis |
| • | foreign-language speaking PCPs and specialists and the specific foreign language(s) spoken; |
| • | how members may obtain directory information in alternate formats that takes into consideration the special needs of eligible individuals including but not limited to, |
| visually-limited, LEP, and LRP eligible individuals; and |
| • | any PCP or specialist practice limitations. |
Appendix H
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
Printed Provider Directory
Prior to receiving a provider agreement, all MCPs must develop a printed provider directory that shall be prior-approved by ODJFS for each covered population. For example, an MCP who serves CFC and ABD in the Central Region would have two provider directories, one for CFC and one for ABD. Once approved, this directory may be regularly updated with provider additions or deletions by the MCP without ODJFS prior-approval, however, copies of the revised directory (or inserts) must be submitted to ODJFS prior to distribution to members.
On a quarterly basis, MCPs must create an insert to each printed directory that lists those providers deleted from the MCP’s provider panel during the previous three months. Although
this insert does not need to be prior approved by ODJFS, copies of the insert must be submitted to ODJFS two weeks prior to distribution to members.
Internet Provider Directory
MCPs are required to have an internet-based provider directory available in the same format as their ODJFS-approved printed directory. This internet directory must allow members to
electronically search for MCP panel providers based on name, provider type, and geographic proximity, and population (e.g. CFC and/or ABD). If an MCP has one internet-based directory for multiple populations, each provider must include a description of which population they serve.
The internet directory may be updated at any time to include providers who are not one of the ODJFS-required provider types listed on the charts included with this appendix. ODJFS-required providers must be added to the internet directory within one week of the MCP’s notification of ODJFS-approval of the provider via the Provider Verification process. Providers
being deleted from the MCP’s panel must deleted from the internet directory within one week of notification from the provider to the MCP. Providers being deleted from the MCP’s panel must be posted to the internet directory within one week of notification from the provider to the MCP of the deletion. These deleted providers must be included in the inserts to the MCP’s provider directory referenced above.
Appendix H
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
6 . | FEDERAL ACCESS STANDARDS |
MCPs must demonstrate that they are in compliance with the following federally defined provider panel access standards as required by 42 CFR 438.206:
In establishing and maintaining their provider panel, MCPs must consider the following:
| The anticipated Medicaid membership. | |
• | The expected utilization of services, taking into consideration the characteristics and health care needs of specific Medicaid populations represented in the MCP. |
• | The number and types (in terms of training, experience, and specialization) of panel providers required to deliver the contracted Medicaid services. |
• | The geographic location of panel providers and Medicaid members, considering distance, travel time, the means of transportation ordinarily used by Medicaid members, and whether the location provides physical access for Medicaid members with disabilities. |
• | MCPs must adequately and timely cover services to an out-of-network provider if the MCP’s contracted provider panel is unable to provide the services covered under the MCP’s provider agreement. The MCP must cover the out-of-network services for as long as the MCP network is unable to provide the services. MCPs must coordinate with the out-of-network provider with respect to payment and ensure that the provider agrees with the applicable requirements. | |
Contracting providers must offer hours of operation that are no less than the hours of operation offered to commercial members or comparable to Medicaid fee-for-service, if the provider serves only Medicaid members. MCPs must ensure that services are available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, when medically necessary. MCPs must establish mechanisms to ensure that panel providers comply with timely access requirements, and must take corrective action if there is failure to comply.
In order to demonstrate adequate provider panel capacity and services, 42 CFR 438.206 and 438.207 stipulates that the MCP must submit documentation to ODJFS, in a format specified by ODJFS, that demonstrates it offers an appropriate range of preventive, primary care and specialty services adequate for the anticipated number of members in the service area, while maintaining a provider panel that is sufficient in number, mix, and geographic distribution to meet the needs of the number of members in the service area.
This documentation of assurance of adequate capacity and services must be submitted to ODJFS no less frequently than at the time the MCP enters into a contract with ODJFS; at any time there is a significant change (as defined by ODJFS) in the MCP’s operations that would affect adequate capacity and services (including changes in services, benefits, geographic service or payments); and at any time there is enrollment of a new population in the MCP.
North East Region - Hospitals |
Minimum Provider Panel Requirements |
| Total Required Hospitals | Ashtabula | Cuyahoga | Erie | Geauga | Huron | Lake | Lorain | Medina | Additional Required Hospitals: Out-of-Region |
General Hospital1 | 8 2 | 1 | 1 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
Hospital System | 1 | | 1 | | | | | | | |
1 These hospitals must provide obstetrical services if such a hospital is available in the county/region. | | | | | |
2 The Cuyahoga hospital requirement may be met by either contracting with (1) a single hospital system that includes fifty (50) pediatric beds and five (5) pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) beds OR (2) a single general hospital that includes fifty (50) pediatric beds and five (5) pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) beds and a hospital system. |
North East Central Region - Hospitals
Minimum Provider Panel Requirements |
| Total Required Hospitals | Columbiana | Mahoning | Trumbull | Additional Required Hospitals: Out-of-Region |
General Hospital1 | 3 | 1 | 1 2 | 1 | |
Hospital System | | | | | |
South East Region - Hospitals
Minimum Provider Panel Requirements |
| Total Required Hospitals | Athens | Belmont | Coshocton | Gallia | Guernsey | Harrison | Jackson | Jefferson | Lawrence | Meigs | Monroe | Morgon | Muskingum | Noble | Vinton | Washington | Additional Required Hospitals: Out-of-Region |
General Hospital1 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | | 1 | | | | | 1 | | | 1 | Cabell AND King's Daughter AND Children's Hospital Columbus |
Hospital System | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 These hospitals must provide obsetrical services if such a hospital is available in the county/region.
Central Region - Hospitals
Minimum Provider Panel Requirements |
| Total Required Hospitals | Crawford | Delaware | Fairfield | Fayette | Franklin | Hocking | Knox | Licking | Logan | Madison | Marion | Morrow | Perry | Pickaway | Pike | Ross | Scioto | Union | Additional Required Hospitals: Out-of-Region |
General Hospital1 | 14 | 1 | | 1 | 1 | 1 2 | | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | | 1 | | 1 | 1 | 1 | Genesis Health Care System, Inc. |
Hospital System | 2 | | | | | 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 These hospitals must provide obstetrical services if such a hospital is available in the county/region, except where a hospital must meet the criteria specified in footnote #4 below. |
2 Must be a hospital that includes one hundred fifty (150) pediatric beds and twenty-five (25) pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) beds. | | | | | | | | | | |
South West Region - Hospitals
Minimum Provider Panel Requirements |
| Total Required Hospitals | Adams | Brown | Butler | Clermont | Clinton | Hamilton | Highland | Warren | Additional Required Hospitals: Out-of-Region |
General Hospital1 | 6 | | 1 | 1 | | 1 | 1 2 | 1 | | Grandview or Miami Valley |
Hospital System | 2 | | | | | | 2 | | | |
1 These hospitals must provide obstetrical services if such a hospital is available in the county/region, except where a hospital must meet the criteria specified in footnote #4 below. |
2 Must be a hospital that includes two-hundred (200) pediatric beds and thirty-five (35) pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) beds. | | | | |
West Central Region - Hospitals
Minimum Provider Panel Requirements |
| Total Required Hospitals | Champaign | Clark | Darke | Greene | Miami | Montgomery | Preble | Shelby | Additional Required Hospitals: Out-of-Region |
General Hospital1 | 6 | | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 2 | | 1 | |
Hospital System | 1 | | | | | | 1 | | | |
1 These hospitals must provide obsetrical services if such a hospital is available in the county/region, except where a hospital must meet the criteria specified in footnote #4 below. |
2 Must be a hospital that includes seventy-five (75) pediatric beds and ten (10) pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) beds. | | | | |
North West Region - Hospitals
Minimum Provider Panel Requirements |
| Total Required Hospitals | Allen | Auglaize | Defiance | Fulton | Hancock | Hardin | Henry | Lucas | Mercer | Ottawa | Paulding | Putnam | Sandusky | Seneca | Van Wert | Williams | Wood | Wyandot | Additional Required Hospitals: Out-of-Region |
General Hospital1 | 10 | 1 | | 1 | 1 | 1 | | | | 1 | | | | 1 | | 1 | 1 | | 1 | Bellevue Hospital Association |
Hospital System | 1 | | | | | | | | 1 2 | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 These hospitals must provide obsetrical services if such a hospital is available in the county/region. | | |
2 Must be a hospital system that includes forty-five (45) pediatric beds and ten (10) pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) beds. | | | | | | | |
North East Region - PCP Capacity
Minimum PCP Capacity Requirements |
PCPs | Total Required | Ashtabula | Cuyahoga | Erie | Geauga | Huron | Lake | Lorain | Medina | Additional Required: In-Region * |
Capacity 1 | 98,212 | 5,256 | 66,564 | 2,873 | 1,111 | 2,612 | 5,210 | 11,431 | 3,155 | |
FTEs | 49.11 | 2.63 | 33.28 | 1.44 | 0.56 | 1.31 | 2.61 | 5.72 | 1.58 | |
1 Based on an FTE of 2000 members | | | |
* Must be located within the region. | | | |
North East Central Region - PCP Capacity
Minimum PCP Capacity Requirements |
PCPs | Total Required | Columbiana | Mahoning | Trumbull | Additional Required: In-Region * |
Capacity 1 | 31,367 | 5,281 | 12,039 | 9,047 | 5,000 |
FTEs | 15.68 | 2.64 | 6.02 | 4.52 | 2.50 |
1 Based on an FTE of 2000 members | | | | |
* Must be located within the region. | | | | |
East Central Region - PCP Capacity
Minimum PCP Capacity Requirements |
PCPs | Total Required | Ashland | Carroll | Holmes | Portage | Richland | Stark | Summit | Tuscarawas | Wayne | Additional Required: In-Region * |
Capacity 1 | 55,006 | 1,732 | 1,226 | 794 | 4,329 | 5,363 | 14,376 | 20,279 | 3,616 | 3,291 | |
FTEs | 27.50 | 0.87 | 0.61 | 0.40 | 2.16 | 2.68 | 7.19 | 10.14 | 1.81 | 1.65 | |
1 Based on an FTE of 2000 members | | | |
* Must be located within the region. | | | |
Central Region - PCP Capacity
County | Capacity 1 | FTEs |
| | |
Total Required | 100,253 | 50.13 |
Crawford | 2,016 | 1.01 |
Delaware | 2,307 | 1.15 |
Fairfield | 4,698 | 2.35 |
Fayette | 1,341 | 0.67 |
Franklin | 55,101 | 27.55 |
Hocking | 1,672 | 0.84 |
Knox | 2,236 | 1.12 |
Licking | 5,897 | 2.95 |
Logan | 1,656 | 0.83 |
Madison | 1,378 | 0.69 |
Marion | 3,042 | 1.52 |
Morrow | 1,492 | 0.75 |
Perry | 2,263 | 1.13 |
Pickaway | 2,123 | 1.06 |
Pike | 2,116 | 1.06 |
Ross | 4,442 | 2.22 |
Scioto | 5,204 | 2.60 |
Union | 1,269 | 0.63 |
1 Based on an FTE of 2000 members | | | | |
* Must be located within the region. | | | | |
South East Region - PCP Capacity
County | Capacity 1 | FTEs |
| | |
Total Required | 53,000 | 26.50 |
Athens | 2,664 | 1.33 |
Belmont | 3,178 | 1.59 |
Coshocton | 1,840 | 0.92 |
Gallia | 1,918 | 0.96 |
Guernsey | 2,518 | 1.26 |
Harrison | 810 | 0.41 |
Jackson | 2,107 | 1.05 |
Jefferson | 3,418 | 1.71 |
Lawrence | 4,021 | 2.01 |
Meigs | 1,557 | 0.78 |
Monroe | 750 | 0.38 |
Morgon | 930 | 0.47 |
Muskingum | 5,304 | 2.65 |
Noble | 581 | 0.29 |
Vinton | 1,061 | 0.53 |
Washington | 2,755 | 1.38 |
Additional Required: In-Region * | 7,000 | 3.50 |
1 Based on an FTE of 2000 members | | | | |
* Must be located within the region. | | | | |
South West Region - PCP Capacity
Minimum PCP Capacity Requirements |
PCPs | Total Required | Adams | Brown | Butler | Clermont | Clinton | Hamilton | Highland | Warren | Additional Required: In-Region * |
Capacity 1 | 58,754 | 2,063 | 2,122 | 12,296 | 5,787 | 1,705 | 29,787 | 2,240 | 2,754 | |
FTEs | 29.38 | 1.03 | 1.06 | 6.15 | 2.89 | 0.85 | 14.89 | 1.12 | 1.38 | |
1 Based on an FTE of 2000 members | | | | |
* Must be located within the region. | | | |
West Central Region - PCP Capacity
Minimum PCP Capacity Requirements |
PCPs | Total Required | Champaign | Clark | Darke | Greene | Miami | Montgomery | Preble | Shelby | Additional Required: In-Region * |
Capacity 1 | 42,784 | 1,472 | 7,225 | 1,476 | 4,347 | 2,550 | 22,751 | 1,541 | 1,422 | |
FTEs | 21.39 | 0.74 | 3.61 | 0.74 | 2.17 | 1.28 | 11.38 | 0.77 | 0.71 | |
1 Based on an FTE of 2000 members | | | | |
* Must be located within the region. | | | | |
North West Region - PCP Capacity
County | Capacity 1 | FTEs |
| | |
Total Required | 68,540 | 34.27 |
Allen | 4,262 | 2.13 |
Auglaize | 1,228 | 0.61 |
Defiance | 1,555 | 0.78 |
Fulton | 1,270 | 0.64 |
Hancock | 2,038 | 1.02 |
Hardin | 1,096 | 0.55 |
Henry | 894 | 0.45 |
Lucas | 24,752 | 12.38 |
Mercer | 821 | 0.41 |
Ottawa | 1,271 | 0.64 |
Paulding | 710 | 0.36 |
Putnam | 770 | 0.39 |
Sandusky | 2,142 | 1.07 |
Seneca | 2,128 | 1.06 |
Van Wert | 847 | 0.42 |
Williams | 1,478 | 0.74 |
Wood | 2,444 | 1.22 |
Wyandot | 634 | 0.32 |
Additional Required: In-Region * | 18,200 | 9.10 |
1 Based on an FTE of 2000 members
* Must be located within the region.
North East Region - Practitioners
Minimum Provider Panel Requirements |
Provider Types | Total Required Providers1 | Ashtabula | Cuyahoga | Erie | Geauga | Huron | Lake | Lorain | Medina | Additional Required Providers2 |
Pediatricians4 | 90 | 1 | 66 | 2 | | | 3 | 8 | 3 | 7 |
OB/GYNs | 25 | 1 | 16 | 1 | | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
Vision | 33 | 1 | 25 | 1 | | | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
General Surgeons | 20 | | 12 | 1 | | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
Otolaryngologist | 6 | | 2 | | | | | 1 | | 3 |
Allergists | 5 | | 2 | | | | | 1 | | 2 |
Orthopedists | 16 | | 8 | 1 | | | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Dentists5 | 89 | 2 | 65 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 3 | 1 |
1 All required providers must be located within the region. |
2 Additional required providers may be located anywhere within the region. |
3 Preferred Providers are the additional provider contracts that must be secured in order for the MCP to receive bonus points. |
4 Half of this number must be certified by the American Board of Pediatrics. |
5 No more than two-thirds of this number can be pediatric dentists. |
North East Central - Practitioners
Minimum Provider Panel Requirements |
Provider Types | Total Required Providers1 | Columbiana | Mahoning | Trumbull | Additional Required Providers2 |
Pediatricians4 | 23 | 2 | 10 | 6 | 5 |
OB/GYNs | 7 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
Vision | 7 | | 3 | 2 | 2 |
General Surgeons | 6 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
Otolaryngologist | 2 | | 1 | | 1 |
Allergists | 1 | | | | 1 |
Orthopedists | 4 | | 2 | 1 | 1 |
Dentists5 | 23 | 2 | 11 | 8 | 2 |
| | | | | |
1 All required providers must be located within the region. | | | | |
2 Additional required providers may be located anywhere within the region. | |
3 Preferred Providers are the additional provider contracts that must be secured in order for the MCP to receive bonus points. | |
4 Half of this number must be certified by the American Board of Pediatrics. | |
5 No more than two-thirds of this number can be pediatric dentists. | |
East Central - Practitioners
Minimum Provider Panel Requirements |
Provider Types | Total Required Providers1 | Ashland | Carroll | Holmes | Portage | Richland | Stark | Summit | Tuscarawas | Wayne | Additional Required Providers2 |
Pediatricians4 | 49 | 1 | | | 2 | 3 | # | # | 2 | 2 | 5 |
OB/GYNs | 17 | | | | | 1 | 5 | 8 | | 1 | 2 |
Vision | 18 | | | | | 1 | 5 | 8 | | | 4 |
General Surgeons | 13 | | | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Otolaryngologist | 7 | | | | | | 2 | 2 | | | 3 |
Allergists | 3 | | | | | | 1 | 1 | | | 1 |
Orthopedists | 9 | | | | | 1 | 2 | 2 | | 1 | 3 |
Dentists5 | 48 | 2 | | | 3 | 5 | 13 | 17 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 All required providers must be located within the region. | | | | | | | | | | |
2 Additional required providers may be located anywhere within the region. | | | | | | | |
3 Preferred Providers are the additional provider contracts that must be secured in order for the MCP to receive bonus points. | | | |
4 Half of this number must be certified by the American Board of Pediatrics. | | | | | | |
5 No more than two-thirds of this number can be pediatric dentists. | | | | | | | | |
South East - Practitioners
Minimum Provider Panel Requirements |
Provider Types | Total Required Providers1 | Athens | Belmont | Coshocton | Gallia | Guernsey | Harrison | Jackson | Jefferson | Lawrence | Meigs | Monroe | Morgon | Muskingum | Noble | Vinton | Washington | Additional Required Providers2 |
Pediatricians4 | 31 | 1 | 1 | | 2 | 1 | | | 1 | | | | | 2 | | | 1 | 22 |
OB/GYNs | 9 | 1 | | | | 1 | | | 1 | | | | | 1 | | | 1 | 4 |
Vision | 13 | 1 | 1 | | 1 | 1 | | 1 | 1 | 1 | | | | 2 | | | 1 | 3 |
General Surgeons | 8 | | 1 | | 1 | 1 | | | 1 | | | | | 1 | | | 1 | 2 |
Otolaryngolo-gist | 3 | | | | 1 | | | | | | | | | 1 | | | | 1 |
Allergists | 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1 |
Orthopedists | 5 | | | | 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4 |
Dentists5 | 30 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | | 1 | 3 | 2 | | | | 3 | | | 2 | 9 |
1 All required providers must be located within the region. | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2 Additional required providers may be located anywhere within the region. | | | | | | | | | | |
3 Preferred Providers are the additional provider contracts that must be secured in order for the MCP to receive bonus points. | | | | | |
4 Half of this number must be certified by the American Board of Pediatrics. | | | | | | | | |
5 No more than two-thirds of this number can be pediatric dentists. | | | | | | | | | | |
Central - - Practitioners
Minimum Provider Panel Requirements |
Provider Types | Total Required Providers1 | Crawford | Delaware | Fairfield | Fayette | Franklin | Hocking | Knox | Licking | Logan | Madison | Marion | Morrow | Perry | Pickaway | Pike | Ross | Scioto | Union | Additional Required Providers2 |
Pediatricians4 | 86 | | 4 | 3 | | 55 | | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | | | 1 | | 2 | 2 | 1 | 11 |
OB/GYNs | 24 | | 2 | 2 | | 12 | | 1 | 1 | | | 1 | | | | | 1 | 1 | | 3 |
Vision | 31 | 1 | 2 | 2 | | 15 | | 1 | 1 | 1 | | 1 | | | 1 | | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
General Surgeons | 22 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | 10 | | 1 | 1 | 1 | | 1 | | | | | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Otolaryngologist | 6 | | 1 | | | 4 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1 |
Allergists | 4 | | | | | 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2 |
Orthopedists | 13 | | | 1 | | 7 | | | 1 | | | 1 | | | | | 1 | | | 2 |
Dentists5 | 77 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 45 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
1 All required providers must be located within the region. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2 Additional required providers may be located anywhere within the region. | | | | | | | | | | | |
3 Preferred Providers are the additional provider contracts that must be secured in order for the MCP to receive bonus points. | | | | | | | |
4 Half of this number must be certified by the American Board of Pediatrics. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
5 No more than two-thirds of this number can be pediatric dentists. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
South West - Practitioners
Minimum Provider Panel Requirements |
Provider Types | Total Required Providers1 | Adams | Brown | Butler | Clermont | Clinton | Hamilton | Highland | Warren | Additional Required Providers2 |
Pediatricians4 | 59 | | | 7 | 2 | 1 | 39 | | | 10 |
OB/GYNs | 16 | | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | | 1 | 1 |
Vision | 21 | | | 3 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
General Surgeons | 13 | | | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | | 1 | 1 |
Otolaryngologist | 6 | | | 1 | | | 3 | | 1 | 1 |
Allergists | 7 | | | | | | 4 | | | 3 |
Orthopedists | 9 | | | 2 | | | 5 | | | 2 |
Dentists5 | 50 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 26 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
1 All required providers must be located within the region. | | | | | | | | |
2 Additional required providers may be located anywhere within the region. |
3 Preferred Providers are the additional provider contracts that must be secured in order for the MCP to receive bonus points. |
4 Half of this number must be certified by the American Board of Pediatrics. |
5 No more than two-thirds of this number can be pediatric dentists. | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
West Central - Practitioners
Minimum Provider Panel Requirements |
Provider Types | Total Required Providers1 | Champaign | Clark | Darke | Greene | Miami | Montgomery | Preble | Shelby | Additional Required Providers2 |
Pediatricians4 | 36 | | 2 | | 3 | 1 | 22 | | | 8 |
OB/GYNs | 12 | | 2 | | 1 | 1 | 6 | | 1 | 1 |
Vision | 20 | | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 10 | | 1 | 2 |
General Surgeons | 10 | | 2 | | 2 | 1 | 3 | | | 2 |
Otolaryngologist | 7 | | 1 | | | | 3 | | | 3 |
Allergists | 4 | | | | | | 2 | | | 2 |
Orthopedists | 5 | | | | 1 | | 2 | | | 2 |
Dentists5 | 38 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 20 | | 1 | 4 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
1 All required providers must be located within the region. | | | | | | | | |
2 Additional required providers may be located anywhere within the region. |
3 Preferred Providers are the additional provider contracts that must be secured in order for the MCP to receive bonus points. |
4 Half of this number must be certified by the American Board of Pediatrics. |
5 No more than two-thirds of this number can be pediatric dentists. | |
North West - Practitioners
Minimum Provider Panel Requirements |
Provider Types | Total Required Providers1 | Allen | Auglaize | Defiance | Fulton | Hancock | Hardin | Henry | Lucas | Mercer | Ottawa | Paulding | Putnam | Sandusky | Seneca | Van Wert | Williams | Wood | Wyandot | Additional Required Providers2 |
Pediatricians4 | 45 | 4 | | | | 1 | | | 23 | | | | | 1 | | | 1 | 2 | | 13 |
OB/GYNs | 13 | 2 | | | | 1 | | | 5 | | | | | 1 | 1 | | | 1 | | 2 |
Vision | 18 | 2 | 1 | 1 | | 1 | | | 7 | 1 | | | | 1 | | | 1 | 2 | | 1 |
General Surgeons | 13 | 2 | | | | 1 | | | 4 | | | | | 1 | | | 1 | 2 | | 2 |
Otolaryngologist | 7 | 1 | | | | 1 | | | 2 | | | | | | | | | | | 3 |
Allergists | 3 | 1 | | | | | | | 1 | | | | | | | | | | | 1 |
Orthopedists | 7 | 2 | | | | 1 | | | 2 | | | | | 1 | | | | 1 | | |
Dentists5 | 45 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 1 | 1 | | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 All required providers must be located within the region. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2 Additional required providers may be located anywhere within the region. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
3 Preferred Providers are the additional provider contracts that must be secured in order for the MCP to receive bonus points. | | | | | | |
4 Half of this number must be certified by the American Board of Pediatrics. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
5 No more than two-thirds of this number can be pediatric dentists. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Appendix I
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
APPENDIX I
PROGRAM INTEGRITY
CFC ELIGIBLE POPULATION
MCPs must comply with all applicable program integrity requirements, including those specified in 42 CFR 455 and 42 CFR 438 Subpart H.
1. Fraud and Abuse Program:
In addition to the specific requirements of OAC rule 5101:3-26-06, MCPs must have a program that includes administrative and management arrangements or procedures, including a mandatory compliance plan to guard against fraud and abuse. The MCP’s compliance plan must designate staff responsibility for administering the plan and include clear goals, milestones or objectives, measurements, key dates for achieving identified outcomes, and explain how the MCP will determine the compliance plan’s effectiveness.
In addition to the requirements in OAC rule 5101:3-26-06, the MCP’s compliance program which safeguards against fraud and abuse must, at a minimum, specifically address the following:
| a. | Employee education about false claims recovery: In order to comply with Section 6032 of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 MCPs must, as a condition of receiving Medicaid payment, do the following: |
| i. | establish and make readily available to all employees, including the MCP’s management, the following written policies regarding false claims recovery: |
| a. | detailed information about the federal False Claims Act and other state and federal laws related to the prevention and detection of fraud, waste, and abuse, including administrative remedies for false claims and statements as well as civil or criminal penalties; |
| b. | the MCP’s policies and procedures for detecting and preventing fraud, waste, and abuse; and |
| c. | the laws governing the rights of employees to be protected as whistleblowers. |
| ii. | include in any employee handbook the required written policies regarding false claims recovery; |
Appendix I
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
| iii. | establish written policies for any MCP contractors and agents that provide detailed information about the federal False Claims Act and other state and federal laws related to the prevention and detection of fraud, waste, and abuse, including administrative remedies for false claims and statements as well as civil or criminal penalties,; the laws governing the rights of employees to be protected as whistleblowers; and the MCP’s policies and procedures for detecting and preventing fraud, waste, and abuse. MCPs must make such information readily available to their subcontractors; and |
| iv. | disseminate the required written policies to all contractors and agents, who must abide by those written policies. |
| b. | Monitoring for fraud and abuse The MCP’s program which safeguards against fraud and abuse must specifically address the MCP’s prevention, detection, investigation, and reporting strategies in at least the following areas: |
| i. | Embezzlement and theft – MCPs must monitor activities on an ongoing basis to prevent and detect activities involving embezzlement and theft (e.g., by staff, providers, contractors, etc.) and respond promptly to such violations. |
| ii. | Underutilization of services – MCPs must monitor for the potential underutilization of services by their members in order to assure that all Medicaid-covered services are being provided, as required. If any underutilized services are identified, the MCP must immediately investigate and, if indicated, correct the problem(s) which resulted in such underutilization of services. |
The MCP’s monitoring efforts must, at a minimum, include the following activities: a) an annual review of their prior authorization procedures to determine that
they do not unreasonably limit a member’s access to Medicaid-covered services; b) an annual review of the procedures providers are to follow in appealing the
MCP’s denial of a prior authorization request to determine that the process does not unreasonably limit a member’s access to Medicaid-covered services; and c)
ongoing monitoring of MCP service denials and utilization in order to identify services which may be underutilized.
| iii. | Claims submission and billing – On an ongoing basis, MCPs must identify and correct claims submission and billing activities which are potentially fraudulent including, at a minimum, double-billing and improper coding, such as upcoding and bundling. |
Appendix I
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
| c. | Reporting MCP fraud and abuse activities: Pursuant to OAC rule 5101:3-26-06, MCPs are required to submit annually to ODJFS a report which summarizes the MCP’s fraud and abuse activities for the previous year in each of the areas specified above. The MCP’s report must also identify any proposed changes to the MCP’s compliance plan for the coming year. |
| d. | Reporting fraud and abuse: MCPs are required to promptly report all instances of provider fraud and abuse to ODJFS and member fraud to the CDJFS. The MCP, at a minimum, must report the following information on cases where the MCP’s investigation has revealed that an incident of fraud and/or abuse has occurred: | |
| i. | provider’s name and Medicaid provider number or provider reporting number (PRN); |
ii. source of complaint;
iii. type of provider;
iv. nature of complaint;
v. approximate range of dollars involved, if applicable;
vi. results of MCP’s investigation and actions taken;
vii. name(s) of other agencies/entities (e.g., medical board, law enforcement)notified by MCP; and
| viii. | legal and administrative disposition of case, including actions taken by law enforcement officials to whom the case has been referred. |
| e. | Monitoring for prohibited affiliations: The MCP’s policies and procedures for ensuring that, pursuant to 42 CFR 438.610, the MCP will not knowingly have a relationship with individuals debarred by Federal Agencies, as specified in Article XII of the Agreement. |
Appendix I
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
2. Data Certification:
Pursuant to 42 CFR 438.604 and 42 CFR 438.606, MCPs are required to provide certification as to the accuracy, completeness, and truthfulness of data and documents submitted to ODJFS which may affect MCP payment.
| a. | MCP Submissions: MCPs must submit the appropriate ODJFS-developed certification concurrently with the submission of the following data or documents: |
i. Encounter Data [as specified in the Data Quality Appendix (Appendix L)]
| ii. | Prompt Pay Reports [as specified in the Fiscal Performance Appendix (Appendix J)] |
| iii. | Cost Reports [as specified in the Fiscal Performance Appendix (Appendix J)] |
iv. Case Management Data [as specified in the Data Quality Appendix
(Appendix L)]
| b. | Source of Certification: The above MCP data submissions must be certified by one of the following: |
i. The MCP’s Chief Executive Officer;
ii. The MCP’s Chief Financial Officer, or
| iii. | An individual who has delegated authority to sign for, or who reports directly to, the MCP’s Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer. |
ODJFS may also require MCPs to certify as to the accuracy, completeness, and truthfulness of additional submissions.
Appendix J
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
WellCare
APPENDIX J
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
CFC ELIGIBLE POPULATION
1. SUBMISSION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND REPORTS
MCPs must submit the following financial reports to ODJFS:
| a. | The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) quarterly and annual Health Statements (hereafter referred to as the “Financial Statements”), as outlined in Ohio Administrative Code (OAC) rule 5101:3-26-09(B). The Financial Statements must include all required Health Statement filings, schedules and exhibits as stated in the NAIC Annual Health Statement Instructions including, but not limited to, the following sections: Assets, Liabilities, Capital and Surplus Account, Cash Flow, Analysis of Operations by Lines of Business, Five-Year Historical Data, and the Exhibit of Premiums, Enrollment and Utilization. The Financial Statements must be submitted to BMHC even if the Ohio Department of Insurance (ODI) does not require the MCP to submit these statements to ODI. A signed hard copy and an electronic copy of the reports in the NAIC-approved format must both be provided to ODJFS; |
| b. | Hard copies of annual financial statements for those entities who have an ownership interest totaling five percent or more in the MCP or an indirect interest of five percent or more, or a combination of direct and indirect interest equal to five percent or more in the MCP; |
| c. | Annual audited Financial Statements prepared by a licensed independent external auditor as submitted to the ODI, as outlined in OAC rule 5101:3-26-09(B); |
| d. | Medicaid Managed Care Plan Annual Ohio Department of Job and Family Services (ODJFS) Cost Report and the auditor’s certification of the cost report, as outlined in OAC rule 5101:3-26-09(B); |
| e. | Medicaid MCP Annual Restated Cost Report for the prior calendar year. The restated cost report shall be audited upon BMHC request; |
| f. | Annual physician incentive plan disclosure statements and disclosure of and changes to the MCP’s physician incentive plans, as outlined in OAC rule 5101:3-26-09(B); |
g. Reinsurance agreements, as outlined in OAC rule 5101:3-26-09(C);
| h. | Prompt Pay Reports, in accordance with OAC rule 5101:3-26-09(B). A hard copy and an electronic copy of the reports in the ODJFS-specified format must be provided to ODJFS; |
Appendix J
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
| i. | Notification of requests for information and copies of information released pursuant to a tort action (i.e., third party recovery), as outlined in OAC rule 5101:3-26-09.1; |
| j. | Financial, utilization, and statistical reports, when ODJFS requests such reports, based on a concern regarding the MCP’s quality of care, delivery of services, fiscal operations or solvency, in accordance with OAC rule 5101:3-26-06(D); |
| k. | In accordance with ORC Section 5111.76 and Appendix C, MCP Responsibilities, MCPs must submit ODJFS-specified franchise fee reports in hard copy and electronic formats pursuant to ODJFS specifications. |
2. FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND STANDARDS
This Appendix establishes specific expectations concerning the financial performance of MCPs. In the interest of administrative simplicity and nonduplication of areas of the ODI authority, ODJFS’ emphasis is on the assurance of access to and quality of care. ODJFS will focus only on a limited number of indicators and related standards to monitor plan performance. The three indicators and standards for this contract period are identified below, along with the calculation methodologies. The source for each indicator will be the NAIC Quarterly and Annual Financial Statements.
Report Period: Compliance will be determined based on the annual Financial
Statement.
a. Indicator: Net Worth as measured by Net Worth Per Member
| Definition: | Net Worth = Total Admitted Assets minus Total Liabilities divided by Total Members across all lines of business |
| Standard: | For the financial report that covers calendar year 2008, a minimum net worth per member of $363.00, as determined from the annual Financial Statement submitted to ODI and the ODJFS. |
The Net Worth Per Member (NWPM) standard is the Medicaid Managed Care Capitation amount paid to the MCP during the preceding calendar year, including delivery payments, but excluding the at-risk amount, expressed as a per-member per-month figure, multiplied by the applicable proportion below:
0.75 if the MCP had a total membership of 100,000 or more during that calendar year 0.90 if the MCP had a total membership of less than 100,000 for that calendar year. If the MCP did not receive Medicaid Managed Care Capitation payments during the preceding calendar year, then the NWPM standard for the MCP is the average Medicaid Managed Care capitation amount paid to Medicaid-contracting MCPs during the preceding calendar year, including delivery payments, but excluding the at-risk amount, multiplied by the applicable proportion above.
Appendix J
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
b. Indicator: Administrative Expense Ratio
| Definition: | Administrative Expense Ratio = Administrative Expenses minus Franchise Fees divided by Total Revenue minus Franchise Fees. |
| Standard: | Administrative Expense Ratio not to exceed 15%, as determined from the annual Financial Statement submitted to ODI and ODJFS. |
c. Indicator: Overall Expense Ratio
Definition: Overall Expense Ratio = The sum of the Administrative Expense Ratio and the Medical Expense Ratio.
Administrative Expense Ratio = Administrative Expenses minus Franchise Fees divided by Total Revenue minus Franchise Fees.
Medical Expense Ratio = Medical Expenses divided by Total Revenue minus Franchise Fees.
| Standard: | Overall Expense Ratio not to exceed 100% as determined from the annual Financial Statement submitted to ODI and ODJFS. |
Penalty for noncompliance: Failure to meet any standard on 2.a., 2.b., or 2.c. above will result in ODJFS requiring the MCP to complete a corrective action plan (CAP) and specifying the date by which compliance must be demonstrated. Failure to meet the standard or otherwise comply with the CAP by the specified date will result in a new membership freeze unless ODJFS determines that the deficiency does not potentially jeopardize access to or quality of care or affect the MCP’s ability to meet administrative requirements (e.g., prompt pay requirements). Justifiable reasons for noncompliance may include one-time events (e.g., MCP investment in information system products).
If the financial statement is not submitted to ODI by the due date, the MCP continues to be obligated to submit the report to ODJFS by ODI’s originally specified due date unless the MCP requests and is granted an extension by ODJFS.
Appendix J
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
Failure to submit complete quarterly and annual Financial Statements on a timely basis will be deemed a failure to meet the standards and will be subject to the noncompliance penalties listed for indicators 2.a., 2.b., and 2.c., including the imposition of a new membership freeze. The new membership freeze will take effect at the first of the month following the month in which the determination was made that the MCP was non-compliant for failing to submit financial reports timely.
In addition, ODJFS will review two liquidity indicators if a plan demonstrates potential problems in meeting related administrative requirements or the standards listed above. The two standards, 2.d and 2.e, reflect ODJFS’ expected level of performance. At this time, ODJFS has not established penalties for noncompliance with these standards; however, ODJFS will consider the MCP’s performance regarding the liquidity measures, in addition to indicators 2.a., 2.b., and 2.c., in determining whether to impose a new membership freeze, as outlined above, or to not issue or renew a contract with an MCP. The source for each indicator will be the NAIC Quarterly and annual Financial Statements.
Long-term investments that can be liquidated without significant penalty within 24 hours, which a plan would like to include in Cash and Short-Term Investments in the next two measurements, must be disclosed in footnotes on the NAIC Reports. Descriptions and amounts should be disclosed. Please note that “significant penalty” for this purpose is any penalty greater than 20%. Also, enter the amortized cost of the investment, the market value of the investment, and the amount of the penalty.
d. Indicator: Days Cash on Hand
| Definition: | Days Cash on Hand = Cash and Short-Term Investments divided by (Total Hospital and Medical Expenses plus Total Administrative Expenses) divided by 365. |
| Standard: | Greater than 25 days as determined from the annual Financial Statement submitted to ODI and ODJFS. |
e. Indicator: Ratio of Cash to Claims Payable
| Definition: | Ratio of Cash to Claims Payable = Cash and Short-Term Investments divided by claims Payable (reported and unreported). |
| Standard: | Greater than 0.83 as determined from the annual Financial Statement submitted to ODI and ODJFS. |
Appendix J
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
3. REINSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
Pursuant to the provisions of OAC rule 5101:3-26-09 (C), each MCP must carry reinsurance coverage from a licensed commercial carrier to protect against inpatient-related medical expenses incurred by Medicaid members.
The annual deductible or retention amount for such insurance must be specified in the reinsurance agreement and must not exceed $75,000.00, except as provided below. Except for transplant services, and as provided below, this reinsurance must cover, at a minimum, 80% of inpatient costs incurred by one member in one year, in excess of $75,000.00.
For transplant services, the reinsurance must cover, at a minimum, 50% of inpatient transplant related costs incurred by one member in one year, in excess of $75,000.00.
An MCP may request a higher deductible amount and/or that the reinsurance cover less than 80% of inpatient costs in excess of the deductible amount. If the MCP does not have more than 75,000 members in Ohio, but does have more than 75,000 members between Ohio and other states, ODJFS may consider alternate reinsurance arrangements. However, depending on the corporate structures of the Medicaid MCP, other forms of security may be required in addition to reinsurance. These other security tools may include parental guarantees, letters of credit, or performance bonds. In determining whether or not the request will be approved, the ODJFS may consider any or all of the following:
| a. | whether the MCP has sufficient reserves available to pay unexpected claims; |
| b. | the MCP’s history in complying with financial indicators 2.a., 2.b., and 2.c., as specified in this Appendix. |
c. the number of members covered by the MCP;
| d. | how long the MCP has been covering Medicaid or other members on a full risk basis. |
e. risk based capital ratio greater than 2.5 calculated from the last annual ODI financial statement.
| f. | scatter diagram or bar graph from the last calendar year that shows the number of reinsurance claims that exceeded the current reinsurance deductible. |
The MCP has been approved to have a reinsurance policy with a deductible amount of $75,000 that covers 80% of inpatient costs in excess of the deductible amount
for non- transplant services.
Appendix J
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
Penalty for noncompliance: If it is determined that an MCP failed to have reinsurance coverage, that an MCP’s deductible exceeds $75,000.00 without approval from ODJFS, or that the MCP’s reinsurance for non-transplant services covers less than 80% of inpatient costs in excess of the deductible incurred by one member for one year without approval from ODJFS, then the MCP will be required to pay a monetary penalty to ODJFS. The amount of the penalty will be the difference between the estimated amount, as determined by ODJFS, of what the MCP would have paid in premiums for the reinsurance policy if it had been in compliance and what the MCP did actually pay while it was out of compliance plus 5%. For example, if the MCP paid $3,000,000.00 in premiums during the period of non-compliance and would have paid $5,000,000.00 if the requirements had been met, then the penalty would be $2,100,000.00.
If it is determined that an MCP’s reinsurance for transplant services covers less than 50% of inpatient costs incurred by one member for one year, the MCP will be required to develop a corrective action plan (CAP).
In accordance with 42 CFR 447.46, MCPs must pay 90% of all submitted clean claims within 30 days of the date of receipt and 99% of such claims within 90 days of the date of receipt, unless the MCP and its contracted provider(s) have established an alternative payment schedule that is mutually agreed upon and described in their contract. The clean pharmacy and non-pharmacy claims will be separately measured against the 30 and 90 day prompt pay standards. The prompt pay requirement applies to the processing of both electronic and paper claims for contracting and non-contracting providers by the MCP and delegated claims processing entities.
The date of receipt is the date the MCP receives the claim, as indicated by its date stamp on the claim. The date of payment is the date of the check or date of electronic payment transmission. A claim means a bill from a provider for health care services that is assigned a unique identifier. A claim does not include an encounter form.
A “claim” can include any of the following: (1) a bill for services; (2) a line item of services; or (3) all services for one recipient within a bill. A “clean claim” is a claim that can be processed without obtaining additional information from the provider of a service or from a third party.
Clean claims do not include payments made to a provider of service or a third party where the timing of the payment is not directly related to submission of a completed claim by the provider of service or third party (e.g., capitation). A clean claim also does not include a claim from a provider who is under investigation for fraud or abuse, or a claim under review for medical necessity.
Penalty for noncompliance: Noncompliance with prompt pay requirements will result in progressive penalties to be assessed on a quarterly basis, as outlined in Appendix N of the Provider Agreement.
Appendix J
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
5. PHYSICIAN INCENTIVE PLAN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS
MCPs must comply with the physician incentive plan requirements stipulated in 42 CFR 438.6(h). If the MCP operates a physician incentive plan, no specific payment can be made directly or indirectly under this physician incentive plan to a physician or physician group as an inducement to reduce or limit medically necessary services furnished to an individual.
If the physician incentive plan places a physician or physician group at substantial financial risk [as determined under paragraph (d) of 42 CFR 422.208] for services that the physician or physician group does not furnish itself, the MCP must assure that all physicians and physician groups at substantial financial risk have either aggregate or per-patient stop-loss protection in accordance with paragraph (f) of 42 CFR 422.208, and conduct periodic surveys in accordance with paragraph (h) of 42 CFR 422.208.
In accordance with 42 CFR 417.479 and 42 CFR 422.210, MCPs must maintain copies of the following required documentation and submit to upon request:
| a. | A description of the types of physician incentive arrangements the MCP has in place which indicates whether they involve a withhold, bonus, capitation, or other arrangement. If a physician incentive arrangement involves a withhold or bonus, the percent of the withhold or bonus must be specified. |
| b. | A description of information/data feedback to a physician/group on their: 1) adherence to evidence-based practice guidelines; and 2) positive and/or negative care variances from standard clinical pathways that may impact outcomes or costs. The feedback information may be used by the MCP for activities such as physician performance improvement projects that include incentive programs or the development of quality improvement initiatives. |
| c. | A description of the panel size for each physician incentive plan. If patients are pooled, then the pooling method used to determine if substantial financial risk exists must also be specified. |
| d. | If more than 25% of the total potential payment of a physician/group is at risk for referral services, the MCP must maintain a copy of the results of the required patient satisfaction survey and documentation verifying that the physician or physician group has adequate stop-loss protection, including the type of coverage (e.g., per member per year, aggregate), the threshold amounts, and any coinsurance required for amounts over the threshold. |
6. NOTIFICATION OF REGULATORY ACTION
Any MCP notified by the ODI of proposed or implemented regulatory action must report such notification and the nature of the action to ODJFS no later than one working day after receipt from ODI. The ODJFS may request, and the MCP must provide, any additional information as necessary to assure continued satisfaction of program requirements. MCPs may request that information related to such actions be considered proprietary in accordance with established ODJFS procedures. Failure to comply with this provision will result in an immediate membership freeze.
Appendix K
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
APPENDIX K
QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
AND
EXTERNAL QUALITY REVIEW
CFC ELIGIBLE POPULATION
1. As required by federal regulation, 42 CFR 438.240, each managed care plan (MCP) must have an ongoing Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement Program (QAPI)
that is annually prior-approved by the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services (ODJFS). The program must include the following elements:
a. PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Each MCP must conduct performance improvement projects (PIPs), including those specified by ODJFS. PIPs must achieve, through periodic measurements and intervention, significant and sustained improvement in clinical and non-clinical areas which are expected to have a favorable effect on health outcomes and satisfaction. MCPs must adhere to ODJFS PIP content and format specifications.
All ODJFS-specified PIPs must be prior-approved by ODJFS. As part of the external quality review organization (EQRO) process, the EQRO will assist MCPs with conducting PIPs by providing technical assistance and will annually validate the PIPs. In addition, the MCP must annually submit to ODJFS the status and results of each PIP.
MCPs must initiate the following PIPs:
| i. | Non-clinical Topic: Identifying children/members with special health care needs. |
ii. Clinical Topic: Well-child visits during the first 15 months of life.
iii. Clinical Topic: Percentage of members aged 2-21 years that access dental care services.
Initiation of PIPs will begin in the second year of participation in the Medicaid managed care program.
b. UNDER- AND OVER-UTILIZATION
Each MCP must have mechanisms in place to detect under- and over-utilization of health care services. The MCP must specify the mechanisms used to monitor utilization in its annual submission of the QAPI program to ODJFS.
Appendix K
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
It should also be noted that pursuant to the program integrity provisions outlined in Appendix I, MCPs must monitor for the potential under-utilization of services by their members in order to assure that all Medicaid-covered services are being provided, as required. If any under-utilized services are identified, the MCP must immediately investigate and correct the problem(s) which resulted in such under-utilization of services.
In addition the MCP must conduct an ongoing review of service denials and must monitor utilization on an ongoing basis in order to identify services which may be under-utilized.
c. SPECIAL HEALTH CARE NEEDS
Each MCP must have mechanisms in place to assess the quality and appropriateness of care furnished to children/members with special health care needs. The MCP must specify the mechanisms used in its annual submission of the QAPI program to ODJFS.
d. SUBMISSION OF PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT DATA
Each MCP must submit clinical performance measurement data as required by ODJFS that enables ODJFS to calculate standard measures. Refer to Appendix M “Performance Evaluation” for a more comprehensive description of the clinical performance measures.
Each MCP must also submit clinical performance measurement data as required by ODJFS that uses standard measures as specified by ODJFS. MCPs are required to submit Health Employer Data Information Set (HEDIS) audited data for the following measures:
| i. | Well Child Visits in the First 15 Months of Life |
ii. Child Immunization Status
The measures must have received a “report” designation from the HEDIS certified auditor and must be specific to the Medicaid population. Data must be submitted annually and in an electronic format. Data will be used for MCP clinical performance monitoring and will be incorporated into comparative reports developed by the EQRO.
Initiation of submission of performance data will begin in the second year of participation in the Medicaid managed care program.
e. QAPI PROGRAM SUBMISSION
Each MCP must implement an evaluation process to review, revise, and/or update the
QAPI program. The MCP must annually submit its QAPI program for review and approval by ODJFS.
Appendix K
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
2. EXTERNAL QUALITY REVIEW
In addition to the following requirements, MCPs must participate in external quality review activities as outlined in OAC 5101:3-26-07.
a. EQRO ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS
The EQRO will conduct annual focused administrative compliance assessments for each MCP which will include, but not be limited to, the following domains as specified by ODJFS: member rights and services, QAPI program, case management, provider networks, grievance system, coordination and continuity of care, and utilization management. In addition, the EQRO will complete a comprehensive administrative compliance assessment every three (3) years as required by 42 CFR 438.358 and specified by ODJFS.
In accordance with 42 CFR 438.360 and 438.362, MCPs with accreditation from a national accrediting organization approved by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) may request a non-duplication exemption from certain specified components of the administrative review. ODJFS will inform the MCPs when a non-duplication exemption may be requested.
b. EXTERNAL QUALITY REVIEW PERFORMANCE
In accordance with OAC 5101: 3-26-07, each MCP must participate in an annual external quality review survey. If the EQRO cites a deficiency in performance, the MCP will be required to complete a Corrective Action Plan (e.g., ODJFS technical assistance session) or Quality Improvement Directives depending on the severity of the deficiency. (An example of a deficiency is if an MCP fails to meet certain clinical or administrative standards as supported by national evidence-based guidelines or best practices.) Serious deficiencies may result in immediate termination or non-renewal of the provider agreement. These quality improvement measures recognize the importance of ongoing MCP performance improvement related to clinical care and service delivery.
Appendix L
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
APPENDIX L
DATA QUALITY
CFC ELIGIBLE POPULATION
A high level of performance on the data quality measures established in this appendix is crucial in order for the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services (ODJFS) to determine the value of the Medicaid Managed Health Care Program and to evaluate Medicaid consumers’ access to and quality of services. Data collected from MCPs are used in key performance assessments such as the external quality review, clinical performance measures, utilization review, care coordination and case management, and in determining incentives. The data will also be used in conjunction with the cost reports in setting the premium payment rates. The following measures, as specified in this appendix, will be calculated per MCP and include all Ohio Medicaid members receiving services from the MCP (i.e., Covered Families and Children (CFC) and Aged, Blind, or Disabled (ABD) membership, if applicable): Incomplete Outpatient Hospital Data, Rejected Encounters, Acceptance Rate, Encounter Data Accuracy, and Generic Provider Number Usage.
Data sets collected from MCPs with data quality standards include: encounter data; case management data; data used in the external quality review; members’ PCP data; and appeal and grievance data.
1. ENCOUNTER DATA
For detailed descriptions of the encounter data quality measures below, see ODJFS Methods for Encounter Data Quality Measures for CFC and ABD.
1.a. Encounter Data Completeness
Each MCP’s encounter data submissions will be assessed for completeness. The MCP is responsible for collecting information from providers and reporting the data to ODJFS in accordance with program requirements established in Appendix C, MCP Responsibilities. Failure to do so jeopardizes the MCP’s ability to demonstrate compliance with other performance standards.
1.a.i. Encounter Data Volume
Measure: The volume measure for each service category, as listed in Table 2 below, is the rate of utilization (e.g., discharges, visits) per 1,000 member months (MM).
Report Period: The report periods for the SFY 2009 and SFY 2010 contract periods are listed in Table 1. below.
Appendix L
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
Table 1. Report Periods for the SFY 2009 and 2010 Contract Periods
Quarterly Report Periods | Data Source: Estimated Encounter Data File Update | Quarterly Report Estimated Issue Date | Contract Period |
Qtr 2 thru Qtr 4 2005, Qtr 1 thru Qtr 4: 2006, 2007 Qtr 1 2008 | July 2008 | August 2008 | SFY 2009 |
Qtr 3, Qtr 4: 2005, Qtr 1 thru Qtr 4: 2006, 2007 Qtr 1, Qtr 2 2008 | October 2008 | November 2008 |
Qtr 4: 2005, Qtr 1 thru Qtr 4: 2006, 2007 Qtr 1 thru Qtr 3: 2008 | January 2009 | February 2009 |
Qtr 1 thru Qtr 4: 2006, 2007, 2008 | April 2009 | May 2009 |
Qtr 2 thru Qtr 4: 2006, Qtr 1 thru Qtr 4: 2007, 2008 Qtr 1 2009 | July 2009 | August 2009 | SFY 2010 |
Qtr 3, Qtr 4: 2006, Qtr 1 thru Qtr 4: 2007, 2008 Qtr 1, Qtr 2: 2009 | October 2009 | November 2009 |
Qtr 4: 2006, Qtr 1 thru Qtr 4: 2007, 2008 Qtr 1 thru Qtr 3: 2009 | January 2010 | February 2010 |
Qtr 1 thru Qtr 4: 2007, 2008, 2009 | April 2010 | May 2010 |
Qtr1 = January to March Qtr2 = April to June Qtr3 = July to SeptemberQtr4 = October to December
Appendix L
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
Table 2. Standards – Encounter Data Volume (County-Based Approach)
Data Quality Standard, County-Based Approach: The standards in Table 2 apply to the MCP’s county-based results (see County-Based Approach below). The utilization rate for all service categories listed in Table 2 must be equal to or greater than the standard established in Table 2 below.
Category | Measure per 1,000/MM | Standard for Dates of Service 7/1/2003 thru 6/30/2004 | Standard for Dates of Service 7/1/2004 thru 6/30/2006 | Standard for Dates of Service on or after 7/1/2006 | Description |
Inpatient Hospital | Discharges | 5.4 | 5.0 | 5.4 | General/acute care, excluding newborns and mental health and chemical dependency services |
Emergency Department | Visits | 51.6 | 51.4 | 50.7 | Includes physician and hospital emergency department encounters |
Dental | 38.2 | 41.7 | 50.9 | Non-institutional and hospital dental visits |
Vision | 11.6 | 11.6 | 10.6 | Non-institutional and hospital outpatient optometry and ophthalmology visits |
Primary and Specialist Care | 220.1 | 225.7 | 233.2 | Physician/practitioner and hospital outpatient visits |
Ancillary Services | 144.7 | 123.0 | 133.6 | Ancillary visits |
Behavioral Health | Service | 7.6 | 8.6 | 10.5 | Inpatient and outpatient behavioral encounters |
Pharmacy | Prescriptions | 388.5 | 457.6 | 492.2 | Prescribed drugs |
County-Based Approach: All counties with managed care membership as of February 1, 2006, will be included in a county-based encounter data volume measure until regional evaluation is implemented for the county’s applicable region.. Upon implementation of regional-based evaluation for a particular county’s region, the county will be included in the MCP’s regional-based results and will no longer be included in the MCP’s county-based results. County-based results will be determined by MCP (i.e., one utilization rate per service category for all applicable counties) and must be equal to or greater than the standards established in Table 2 above. [Example: The county-based result for MCP AAA, which has contracts in the Central and West Central regions, will include Franklin, Pickaway, Montgomery, Greene and Clark counties (i.e., counties with managed care membership as of February 1, 2006). When the regional-based evaluation is implemented for the Central region, Franklin and Pickaway counties, along with all other counties in the region, will then be included in the Central region results for MCP AAA; Montgomery, Greene, and Clark counties will remain in the county-based results for MCP AAA until the West Central regional measure is implemented.]
Appendix L
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
Interim Regional-Based Approach:
Prior to the transition to the regional-based approach, encounter data volume will be evaluated by MCP, by region, using an interim approach. All regions with managed care membership will be included in results for an interim regional-based encounter data volume measure until regional evaluation is implemented for the applicable region (see Regional-Based Approach below). Encounter data volume will be evaluated by MCP ( i.e., one utilization rate per service category for all counties in the region). The utilization rate for all service categories listed in Table 3 must be equal to or greater than the standard established in Table 3 below. The standards listed in Table 3 below are based on utilization data for counties with managed care membership as of February 1, 2006, and have been adjusted to accommodate estimated differences in utilization for all counties in a region, including counties that did not have membership as of February 1, 2006.
Prior to implementation of the regional-based approach, an MCP’s encounter data volume will be evaluated using the county-based approach and the interim regional-based approach. A county with managed care membership as of February 1, 2006, will be included in both the County-Based approach and the Interim Regional-Based approach until regional evaluation is implemented for the county’s applicable region.
Data Quality Standard, Interim Regional-Based Approach: The standards in Table 3 apply to the MCP’s interim regional-based results. The utilization rate for all service categories listed in Table 3 must be equal to or greater than the standard established in Table 3 below.
Table 3. Standards – Encounter Data Volume (Interim Regional-Based Approach)
Category | Measure per 1,000/MM | Standard for Dates of Service on or after 7/1/2006 | Description |
Inpatient Hospital | Discharges | 2.7 | General/acute care, excluding newborns and mental health and chemical dependency services |
Emergency Department | Visits | 25.3 | Includes physician and hospital emergency department encounters |
Dental | 25.5 | Non-institutional and hospital dental visits |
Vision | 5.3 | Non-institutional and hospital outpatient optometry and ophthalmology visits |
Primary and Specialist Care | 116.6 | Physician/practitioner and hospital outpatient visits |
Ancillary Services | 66.8 | Ancillary visits |
Behavioral Health | Service | 5.2 | Inpatient and outpatient behavioral encounters |
Pharmacy | Prescriptions | 246.1 | Prescribed drugs |
Regional-Based Approach:
Transition to the regional-based approach will occur by region, after the first four quarters (i.e., full calendar year quarters) of regional membership. Encounter data volume will be evaluated by MCP, by region (i.e., one utilization rate per service category for all counties in the region), after determination of the regional-based data quality standards. ODJFS will use the first four quarters of data (i.e., full calendar year quarters) from all MCPs serving in an active region to determine minimum encounter volume data quality standards for that region.
The utilization rate for all service categories listed in Table 4 must be equal to or greater than the standard established in Table 4 below. The standards listed in Table 4 below are based on utilization data for regions and have been adjusted to accommodate estimated differences in utilization for all counties in a region, including counties that did not have membership as of February 1, 2006.
Appendix L
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
Table 4. Standards – Encounter Data Volume (Regional-Based Approach)
Region | Category | Measure per 1,000/MM | Standard for Dates of Service on or after 7/1/2007 | Description |
Central | Inpatient Hospital | Discharges | TBD | General/acute care, excluding newborns and mental health and chemical dependency services |
Emergency Department | Visits | TBD | Includes physician and hospital emergency department encounters |
Dental | TBD | Non-institutional and hospital dental visits |
Vision | TBD | Non-institutional and hospital outpatient optometry and ophthalmology visits |
Primary & Specialist Care | TBD | Physician/practitioner and hospital outpatient visits |
Ancillary Services | TBD | Ancillary visits |
Behavioral Health | Service | TBD | Inpatient and outpatient behavioral encounters |
Pharmacy | Prescriptions | TBD | Prescribed drugs |
East Central | Inpatient Hospital | Discharges | TBD | General/acute care, excluding newborns and mental health and chemical dependency services |
Emergency Department | Visits | TBD | Includes physician and hospital emergency department encounters |
Dental | TBD | Non-institutional and hospital dental visits |
Vision | TBD | Non-institutional and hospital outpatient optometry and ophthalmology visits |
Primary & Specialist Care | TBD | Physician/practitioner and hospital outpatient visits |
Ancillary Services | TBD | Ancillary visits |
Behavioral Health | Service | TBD | Inpatient and outpatient behavioral encounters |
Pharmacy | Prescriptions | TBD | Prescribed drugs |
Northeast | Inpatient Hospital | Discharges | TBD | General/acute care, excluding newborns and mental health and chemical dependency services |
Emergency Department | Visits | TBD | Includes physician and hospital emergency department encounters |
Dental | TBD | Non-institutional and hospital dental visits |
Vision | TBD | Non-institutional and hospital outpatient optometry and ophthalmology visits |
Primary & Specialist Care | TBD | Physician/practitioner and hospital outpatient visits |
Ancillary Services | TBD | Ancillary visits |
Behavioral Health | Service | TBD | Inpatient and outpatient behavioral encounters |
Pharmacy | Prescriptions | TBD | Prescribed drugs |
Northeast Central | Inpatient Hospital | Discharges | TBD | General/acute care, excluding newborns and mental health and chemical dependency services |
Emergency Department | Visits | TBD | Includes physician and hospital emergency department encounters |
Dental | TBD | Non-institutional and hospital dental visits |
Vision | TBD | Non-institutional and hospital outpatient optometry and ophthalmology visits |
Primary & Specialist Care | TBD | Physician/practitioner and hospital outpatient visits |
Ancillary Services | TBD | Ancillary visits |
Behavioral Health | Service | TBD | Inpatient and outpatient behavioral encounters |
Pharmacy | Prescriptions | TBD | Prescribed drugs |
Appendix L
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
Region | Category | Measure per 1,000/MM | Standard for Dates of Service on or after 7/1/2007 | Description |
North-west | Inpatient Hospital | Discharges | TBD | General/acute care, excluding newborns and mental health and chemical dependency services |
Emergency Department | Visits | TBD | Includes physician and hospital emergency department encounters |
Dental | TBD | Non-institutional and hospital dental visits |
Vision | TBD | Non-institutional and hospital outpatient optometry and ophthalmology visits |
Primary & Specialist Care | TBD | Physician/practitioner and hospital outpatient visits |
Ancillary Services | TBD | Ancillary visits |
Behavioral Health | Service | TBD | Inpatient and outpatient behavioral encounters |
Pharmacy | Prescriptions | TBD | Prescribed drugs |
Southeast | Inpatient Hospital | Discharges | TBD | General/acute care, excluding newborns and mental health and chemical dependency services |
Emergency Department | Visits | TBD | Includes physician and hospital emergency department encounters |
Dental | TBD | Non-institutional and hospital dental visits |
Vision | TBD | Non-institutional and hospital outpatient optometry and ophthalmology visits |
Primary & Specialist Care | TBD | Physician/practitioner and hospital outpatient visits |
Ancillary Services | TBD | Ancillary visits |
Behavioral Health | Service | TBD | Inpatient and outpatient behavioral encounters |
Pharmacy | Prescriptions | TBD | Prescribed drugs |
South-west | Inpatient Hospital | Discharges | TBD | General/acute care, excluding newborns and mental health and chemical dependency services |
Emergency Department | Visits | TBD | Includes physician and hospital emergency department encounters |
Dental | TBD | Non-institutional and hospital dental visits |
Vision | TBD | Non-institutional and hospital outpatient optometry and ophthalmology visits |
Primary & Specialist Care | TBD | Physician/practitioner and hospital outpatient visits |
Ancillary Services | TBD | Ancillary visits |
Behavioral Health | Service | TBD | Inpatient and outpatient behavioral encounters |
Pharmacy | Prescriptions | TBD | Prescribed drugs |
West Central | Inpatient Hospital | Discharges | TBD | General/acute care, excluding newborns and mental health and chemical dependency services |
Emergency Department | Visits | TBD | Includes physician and hospital emergency department encounters |
Dental | TBD | Non-institutional and hospital dental visits |
Vision | TBD | Non-institutional and hospital outpatient optometry and ophthalmology visits |
Primary & Specialist Care | TBD | Physician/practitioner and hospital outpatient visits |
Ancillary Services | TBD | Ancillary visits |
Behavioral Health | Service | TBD | Inpatient and outpatient behavioral encounters |
Pharmacy | Prescriptions | TBD | Prescribed drugs |
Appendix L
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
Determination of Compliance: Performance is monitored once every quarter for the entire report period. If the standard is not met for every service category in all quarters of the report period in either the county-based, interim regional-based, or regional-based approach, then the MCP will be determined to be noncompliant for the report period.
Penalty for noncompliance: The first time an MCP is noncompliant with a standard for this measure, ODJFS will issue a Sanction Advisory informing the MCP that any future noncompliance instances with the standard for this measure will result in ODJFS imposing a monetary sanction. Upon all subsequent measurements of performance, if an MCP is again determined to be noncompliant with the standard, ODJFS will impose a monetary sanction (see Section 6.) of two percent of the current month’s premium payment. Monetary sanctions will not be levied for consecutive quarters that an MCP is determined to be noncompliant. If an MCP is noncompliant for three consecutive quarters, membership will be frozen. Once the MCP is determined to be compliant with the standard and the violations/deficiencies are resolved to the satisfaction of ODJFS, the penalties will be lifted, if applicable, and monetary sanctions will be returned.
1.a.ii. Incomplete Outpatient Hospital Data
Since July 1, 1997, MCPs have been required to provide both the revenue code and the HCPCS code on applicable outpatient hospital encounters. ODJFS will be monitoring, on a quarterly basis, the percentage of hospital encounters which contain a revenue code and CPT/HCPCS code. A CPT/HCPCS code must accompany certain revenue center codes. These codes are listed in Appendix B of Ohio Administrative Code rule 5101:3-2-21 (fee-for-service outpatient hospital policies) and in the methods for calculating the completeness measures.
Measure: The percentage of outpatient hospital line items with certain revenue center codes, as explained above, which had an accompanying valid procedure (CPT/HCPCS) code. The measure will be calculated per MCP.
Report Period: For the SFY 2009 and SFY 2010 contract periods, performance will be evaluated using the report periods listed in 1.a.i., Table 1.
Data Quality Standard: The data quality standard is a minimum rate of 95%.
Determination of Compliance: Performance is monitored once every quarter for all report periods.
For quarterly reports that are issued on or after July 1, 2007, an MCP will be determined to be noncompliant for the quarter if the standard is not met in any report period and the initial instance of noncompliance in a report period is determined on or after July 1, 2007. An initial instance of noncompliance means that the result for the applicable report period was in compliance as determined in the prior quarterly report, or the instance of noncompliance is the first determination for an MCP’s first quarter of measurement.
Appendix L
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
Penalty for noncompliance: The first time an MCP is noncompliant with a standard for this measure, ODJFS will issue a Sanction Advisory informing the MCP that any future noncompliance instances with the standard for this measure will result in ODJFS imposing a monetary sanction.
Upon all subsequent quarterly measurements of performance, if an MCP is again determined to be noncompliant with the standard, ODJFS will impose a monetary sanction (see Section 6) of one percent of the current month’s premium payment. Once the MCP is performing at standard levels and violations/deficiencies are resolved to the satisfaction of ODJFS, the money will be refunded.
1.a.iii. Incomplete Data For Last Menstrual Period
As outlined in ODJFS Encounter Data Specifications, the last menstrual period (LMP) field is a required encounter data field. It is discussed in Item 14 of the “HCFA 1500 Billing Instructions.” The date of the LMP is essential for calculating the clinical performance measures and allows the ODJFS to adjust performance expectations for the length of a pregnancy.
The occurrence code and date fields on the UB-92, which are “optional” fields, can also be used to submit the date of the LMP. These fields are described in Items 32a & b, 33a & b, 34a & b, 35a & b of the “Inpatient Hospital” and “Outpatient Hospital UB-92 Claim Form Instructions.”
An occurrence code value of ‘10’ indicates that a LMP date was provided. The actual date of the LMP would be given in the ‘Occurrence Date’ field.
Measure: The percentage of recipients with a live birth during the report period where a “valid” LMP date was given on one or more of the recipient’s perinatal claims. If the LMP date is before the date of birth and there is a difference of between 119 and 315 days between the date the recipient gave birth and the LMP date, then the LMP date will be considered a valid date. The measure will be calculated per MCP (i.e., to include the MCP’s service area for the CFC.
Report Period: For the SFY 2009 contract period, performance will be evaluated using the January - December 2008 report period. For the SFY 2010 contract period, performance will be evaluated using the January - December 2009 report period.
Data Quality Standard: The data quality standard is a minimum rate of 80%.
Penalty for noncompliance: The first time an MCP is noncompliant with a standard for this measure, ODJFS will issue a Sanction Advisory informing the MCP that any future noncompliance instances with the standard for this measure will result in ODJFS imposing a monetary sanction. Upon all subsequent measurements of performance, if an MCP is again determined to be noncompliant with the standard, ODJFS will impose a monetary sanction (see Section 6.) of one percent of the current month’s premium payment. Once the MCP is performing at standard levels and violations/deficiencies are resolved to the satisfaction of ODJFS, the money will be refunded.
Appendix L
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
1.a.iv. Rejected Encounters
Encounters submitted to ODJFS that are incomplete or inaccurate are rejected and reported back to the MCPs on the Exception Report. If an MCP does not resubmit rejected encounters, ODJFS’ encounter data set will be incomplete.
Measure 1 only applies to MCPs that have had Medicaid membership for more than one year.
Measure 1: The percentage of encounters submitted to ODJFS that are rejected. The measure will be calculated per MCP.
Report Period: For the SFY 2009 contract period, performance will be evaluated using the following report periods July - September 2008; October - December 2008; January - March 2009; April – June 2009. For the SFY 2010 contract period, performance will be evaluated using the following report periods July - September 2009; October - December 2009; January - March 2010; April – June 2010.
Data Quality Standard for measure 1: Data Quality Standard 1 is a maximum encounter data rejection rate of 10% for each file type in the ODJFS-specified medium per format for encounters submitted in SFY 2004 and thereafter. The measure will be calculated per MCP.
Determination of Compliance: Performance is monitored once every quarter. Compliance determination with the standard applies only to the quarter under consideration and does not include performance in previous quarters.
Penalty for noncompliance with the Data Quality Standard for measure 1: The first time an MCP is noncompliant with a standard for this measure, ODJFS will issue a Sanction Advisory informing the MCP that any future noncompliance instances with the standard for this measure will result in ODJFS imposing a monetary sanction. Upon all subsequent measurements of performance, if an MCP is again determined to be noncompliant with the standard, ODJFS will impose a monetary sanction (see Section 6.) of one percent of the current month’s premium payment. The monetary sanction will be applied for each file type in the ODJFS-specified medium per format that is determined to be out of compliance. Once the MCP is performing at standard levels and violations/deficiencies are resolved to the satisfaction of ODJFS, the money will be refunded.
Measure 2 only applies to MCPs that have had Medicaid membership for one year or less.
Measure 2: The percentage of encounters submitted to ODJFS that are rejected. The measure will be calculated per MCP.
Report Period: The report period for Measure 2 is monthly. Results are calculated and performance is monitored monthly. The first reporting month begins with the third month of enrollment.
Appendix L
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
Data Quality Standard for measure 2: The data quality standard is a maximum encounter data rejection rate for each file type in the ODJFS-specified medium per format as follows:
Third through sixth months with membership: 50%
Seventh through twelfth month with membership: 25%
Files in the ODJFS-specified medium per format that are totally rejected will not be considered in the determination of noncompliance.
Determination of Compliance: Performance is monitored once every month. Compliance determination with the standard applies only to the month under consideration and does not include performance in previous quarters.
Penalty for Noncompliance with the Data Quality Standard for measure 2: If the MCP is determined to be noncompliant for either standard, ODJFS will impose a monetary sanction of one percent of the MCP’s current month’s premium payment. The monetary sanction will be applied for each file type in the ODJFS-specified medium per format that is determined to be out of compliance. The monetary sanction will be applied only once per file type per compliance determination period and will not exceed a total of two percent of the MCP’s current month’s premium payment. Once the MCP is performing at standard levels and violations/deficiencies are resolved to the satisfaction of ODJFS, the money will be refunded. Special consideration will be made for MCPs with less than 1,000 members.
1.a.v. Acceptance Rate
This measure only applies to MCPs that have had Medicaid membership for one year or less.
Measure: The rate of encounters that are submitted to ODJFS and accepted (accepted encounters per 1,000 member months). The measure will be calculated per MCP
Report Period: The report period for this measure is monthly. Results are calculated and performance is monitored monthly. The first reporting month begins with the third month of enrollment.
Data Quality Standard: The data quality standard is a monthly minimum accepted rate of encounters for each file type in the ODJFS-specified medium per format as follows:
Third through sixth month with membership: 50 encounters per 1,000 MM for NCPDP
65 encounters per 1,000 MM for NSF
20 encounters per 1,000 MM for UB-92
Seventh through twelfth month of membership: 250 encounters per 1,000 MM for NCPDP
350 encounters per 1,000 MM for NSF
100 encounters per 1,000 MM for UB-92
Appendix L
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
Determination of Compliance: Performance is monitored once every month. Compliance determination with the standard applies only to the month under consideration and does not include performance in previous months.
Penalty for Noncompliance: If the MCP is determined to be noncompliant with the standard, ODJFS will impose a monetary sanction of one percent of the MCP’s current month’s premium payment. The monetary sanction will be applied for each file type in the ODJFS-specified medium per format that is determined to be out of compliance. The monetary sanction will be applied only once per file type per compliance determination period and will not exceed a total of two percent of the MCP’s current month’s premium payment. Once the MCP is performing at standard levels and violations/deficiencies are resolved to the satisfaction of ODJFS, the money will be refunded. Special consideration will be made for MCPs with less than 1,000 members.
1.b. Encounter Data Accuracy
As with data completeness, MCPs are responsible for assuring the collection and submission of accurate data to ODJFS. Failure to do so jeopardizes MCPs’ performance, credibility and, if not corrected, will be assumed to indicate a failure in actual performance.
1.b.i. Encounter Data Accuracy Studies
Measure 1: The focus of this accuracy study will be on delivery encounters. Its primary purpose will be to verify that MCPs submit encounter data accurately and to ensure only one payment is made per delivery. The rate of appropriate payments will be determined by comparing a sample of delivery payments to the medical record. The measure will be calculated per MCP (i.e., to include the MCP’s entire service area for the CFC membership.
Report Period: In order to provide timely feedback on the accuracy rate of encounters, the report period will be the most recent from when the measure is initiated. This measure is conducted annually.
Medical records retrieval from the provider and submittal to ODJFS or its designee is an integral component of the validation process. ODJFS has optimized the sampling to minimize the number of records required. This methodology requires a high record submittal rate. To aid MCPs in achieving a high submittal rate, ODJFS will give at least an 8 week period to retrieve and submit medical records as a part of the validation process. A record submittal rate will be calculated as a percentage of all records requested for the study.
Data Quality Standard 1 for Measure 1: For results that are finalized during the contract year, the accuracy rate for encounters generating delivery payments is 100%.
Appendix L
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
Penalty for noncompliance: The MCP must participate in a detailed review of delivery payments made for deliveries during the report period. Any duplicate or unvalidated delivery payments must be returned to ODJFS.
Data Quality Standard 2 for Measure 1: A minimum record submittal rate of 85%.
Penalty for noncompliance: For all encounter data accuracy studies that are completed during this contract period, if an MCP is noncompliant with the standard, ODJFS will impose a non-refundable $10,000 monetary sanction.
Measure 2: This accuracy study will compare the accuracy and completeness of payment data stored in MCPs’ claims systems during the study period to payment data submitted to and accepted by ODJFS. The measure will be calculated per MCP. ��
Payment information found in MCPs’ claims systems for paid claims that does not match payment information found on a corresponding encounter will be counted as omissions.
Report Period: In order to provide timely feedback on the omission rate of encounters, the report period will be the most recent from when the measure is initiated. This measure is conducted annually.
Data Quality Standard for Measure 2: For SFY 2009 and SFY 2010, to be determined.
Penalty for Noncompliance: The first time an MCP is noncompliant with a standard for this measure, ODJFS will issue a Sanction Advisory informing the MCP that any future noncompliance instances with the standard for this measure will result in ODJFS imposing a monetary sanction. Upon all subsequent measurements of performance, if an MCP is again determined to be noncompliant with the standard, ODJFS will impose a monetary sanction (see Section 6) of one percent of the current month’s premium payment. Once the MCP is performing at standard levels and violations/deficiencies are resolved to the satisfaction of ODJFS, the money will be refunded.
1.b.ii. Generic Provider Number Usage
Measure 1: This measure is the percentage of institutional (UB-92) and professional (NSF) encounters with the generic provider number in the Medicaid Provider Number field. Providers submitting claims which do not have an MMIS provider number in the Medicaid Provider Number field must be submitted to ODJFS with the generic provider number (i.e. 9111115). The measure will be calculated per MCP. The report period for this measure is quarterly.
Report Period for Measure 1: For the SFY 2009 and SFY 2010 contract periods, performance will be evaluated using the report periods listed in 1.a.i., Table 1.
Appendix L
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
Data Quality Standard for Measure 1: A maximum generic provider number usage rate of 10%.
Determination of Compliance for Measure 1: Performance is monitored once every quarter for all report periods. For quarterly reports that are issued on or after July 1, 2007, an MCP will be determined to be noncompliant for the quarter if the standard is not met in any report period and the initial instance of noncompliance in a report period is determined on or after July 1, 2007. An initial instance of noncompliance means that the result for the applicable report period was in compliance as determined in the prior quarterly report, or the instance of noncompliance is the first determination for an MCP’s first quarter of measurement.
Penalty for noncompliance for Measure 1: The first time an MCP is noncompliant with a standard for this measure, ODJFS will issue a Sanction Advisory informing the MCP that any future noncompliance instances with the standard for this measure will result in ODJFS imposing a monetary sanction.
Upon all subsequent measurements of performance, if an MCP is again determined to be noncompliant with the standard, ODJFS will impose a monetary sanction (see Section 6.) of three percent of the current month’s premium payment. Once the MCP is performing at standard levels and violations/deficiencies are resolved to the satisfaction of ODJFS, the money will be refunded.
Measure 2: This measure is the percentage of pharmacy encounters with the generic provider number in the “Prescribing Provider ID” field. Providers submitting claims which do not have an MMIS provider number in the “Prescribing Provider ID” field must be submitted to ODJFS with the generic provider number (i.e. 9111115). The measure will be calculated per MCP. The report period for this measure is quarterly.
Report Period for Measure 2: For the SFY 2009 and SFY 2010 contract periods, performance will be evaluated using the report periods listed in 1.a.i., Table 1.
Data Quality Standard for Measure 2: To be determined.
Determination of Compliance for Measure 2: Performance is monitored once every quarter for all report periods on or after July 1, 2008. An initial instance of noncompliance means that the result for the applicable report period was in compliance as determined in the prior quarterly report, or the instance of noncompliance is the first determination for an MCP’s first quarter of measurement.
Penalty for noncompliance with Measure 2 : The first time an MCP is noncompliant with a standard for this measure, ODJFS will issue a Sanction Advisory informing the MCP that any future noncompliance instances with the standard for this measure will result in ODJFS imposing a monetary sanction.
Upon all subsequent measurements of performance, if an MCP is again determined to be noncompliant with the standard, ODJFS will impose a monetary sanction (see Section 6.) of three percent of the current month’s premium payment. Once the MCP is performing at standard levels and violations/deficiencies are resolved to the satisfaction of ODJFS, the money will be refunded.
Appendix L
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
1.c. Timely Submission of Encounter Data
1.c.i. Timeliness
ODJFS recommends submitting encounters no later than thirty-five days after the end of the month in which they were paid. ODJFS does not monitor standards specifically for timeliness, but the minimum claims volume (Section 1.a.i.) and the rejected encounter (Section 1.a.v.) standards are based on encounters being submitted within this time frame.
1.c.ii. Submission of Encounter Data Files in the ODJFS-specified medium per format
Information concerning the proper submission of encounter data may be obtained from the ODJFS Encounter Data File and Submission Specifications document. The MCP must submit a letter of certification, using the form required by ODJFS, with each encounter data file in the ODJFS-specified medium per format.
The letter of certification must be signed by the MCP’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Chief Financial Officer (CFO), or an individual who has delegated authority to sign for, and who reports directly to, the MCP’s CEO or CFO.
ODJFS designed a case management system (CAMS) in order to monitor MCP compliance with program requirements specified in Appendix G, Coverage and Services. Each MCP’s case management data submissions will be assessed for completeness and accuracy. The MCP is responsible for submitting a case management file every month. Failure to do so jeopardizes the MCP’s ability to demonstrate compliance with CSHCN requirements. For detailed descriptions of the case management measures below, see ODJFS Methods for Case Management Data Quality Measures.
2.a. Case Management System Data Accuracy
2.a.i. Open Case Management Spans for Disenrolled Members (this measure will be discontinued as of January 2008)
Measure: The percentage of the MCP’s adult and children case management records in the Screening, Assessment, and Case Management System that have open case management date spans for members who have disenrolled from the MCP.
Report Period: For the SFY 2008 contract period, July – September 2007, and October – December 2007.
Statewide and Regional Data Quality Standard: A rate of open case management spans for disenrolled members of no more than 1.0%.
Appendix L
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
For an MCP which had membership as of February 1, 2006: Performance will be evaluated using: 1) region-based results for any active region in which all selected MCPs had at least 10,000 members during each month of the entire report period; and/or 2) the statewide result for all counties that were not included in the region-based results, but in which the MCP had managed care membership as of February 1, 2006.
For any MCP which did not have membership as of February 1, 2006: Performance will begin to be evaluated using region-based results for any active region in which all selected MCPs had at least 10,000 members during each month of the entire report period.
Regional-Based Approach: MCPs will be evaluated by region, using results for all counties included in the region.
Penalty for noncompliance: If an MCP is noncompliant with the standard, then the ODJFS will issue a Sanction Advisory informing the MCP that a monetary sanction will be imposed if the MCP is noncompliant for any future report periods. Upon all subsequent semi-annual measurements of performance, if an MCP is again determined to be noncompliant with the standard, ODJFS will impose a monetary sanction of one-half of one percent of the current month’s premium payment. Once the MCP is performing at standard levels and violations/deficiencies are resolved to the satisfaction of ODJFS, the money will be refunded.
2.b. Timely Submission of Case Management Files
Data Quality Submission Requirement: The MCP must submit Case Management files on a monthly basis according to the specifications established in ODJFS’ Case Management File and Submission Specifications.
Penalty for noncompliance: See Appendix N, Compliance Assessment System, for the penalty for noncompliance with this requirement.
3. EXTERNAL QUALITY REVIEW DATA | |
In accordance with federal law and regulations, ODJFS is required to conduct an independent quality review of contracting managed care plans. OAC rule 5101:3-26-07(C) requires MCPs to submit data and information as requested by ODJFS or its designee for the annual external quality review.
Two information sources are integral to these studies: encounter data and medical records. Because encounter data is used to draw samples for these studies, quality must be sufficient to ensure valid sampling.
An adequate number of medical records must then be retrieved from providers and submitted to ODJFS or its designee in order to generalize results to all applicable members. To aid MCPs in achieving the required medical record submittal rate, ODJFS will give at least an eight week period to retrieve and submit medical records.
Appendix L
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
3.a. Independent External Quality Review
Measure: The percentage of requested records for a study conducted by the External Quality Review Organization (EQRO) that are submitted by the managed care plan.
Report Period: The report period is one year. Results are calculated and performance is monitored annually. Performance is measured with each review.
Data Quality Standard: A minimum record submittal rate of 85% for each clinical measure.
Penalty for noncompliance for Data Quality Standard: For each study that is completed during this contract period, if an MCP is noncompliant with the standard, ODJFS will impose a non-refundable $10,000 monetary sanction.
4. MEMBERS’ PCP DATA
The designated PCP is the provider who will manage and coordinate the overall care for CFC members, including those who have case management needs. The MCP must submit a Members’ Designated PCP file every month. Specialists may and should be identified as the PCP as appropriate for the member’s condition per the specialty types specified for the CFC population in ODJFS Member’s PCP Data File and Submission Specifications; however, no CFC member may have more than one PCP identified for a given month.
4.a. Timely submission of Member’s PCP Data
Data Quality Submission Requirement: The MCP must submit a Members’ Designated PCP Data file on a monthly basis according to the specifications established in ODJFS Member’s PCP Data File and Submission Specifications.
Penalty for noncompliance: See Appendix N, Compliance Assessment System, for the penalty for noncompliance with this requirement.
Appendix L
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
4.b. Designated PCP for newly enrolled members (only applicable for report periods prior to January 2008)
Measure: The percentage of MCP’s newly enrolled members who were designated a PCP by their effective date of enrollment.
Report Periods: For the SFY 2008 contract period, performance will be evaluated using the July-September 2007, and October – December 2007 report periods.
Data Quality Standard: SFY 2007 will be informational only. A minimum rate of 75% of new members with PCP designation by their effective date of enrollment for quarter one and quarter two of SFY 2008.
Statewide Approach: MCPs will be evaluated using a statewide result, including all active regions and counties (Mahoning and Trumbull) in which an MCP has CFC membership.
Penalty for noncompliance: If an MCP is noncompliant with the standard, ODJFS will impose a monetary sanction of one-half of one percent the current month’s premium payment. Once the MCP is performing at standard levels and violations/deficiencies are resolved to the satisfaction of ODJFS, the money will be refunded. As stipulated in OAC rule 5101:3-26-08.2, each new member must have a designated primary care provider (PCP) prior to their effective date of coverage. Therefore, MCPs are subject to additional corrective action measures under Appendix N, Compliance Assessment System, for failure to meet this requirement.
4.b.i. Designated PCP for newly enrolled members (only applicable for report periods after December 2007)
Measure: The percentage of MCP’s newly enrolled members who were designated a PCP by their effective date of enrollment.
Statewide Approach: MCPs will be evaluated using their statewide result, including all active regions and counties (Mahoning and Trumbull) in which an MCP has CFC membership.
Report Periods: For the SFY 2009 contract period, performance will be evaluated annually using CY 2008. For the SFY 2010 contract period, performance will be evaluated annually using CY 2009.
Data Quality Standards: For SFY 2009, a minimum rate of 85% of new members with PCP designation by their effective date of enrollment. For SFY 2010, a minimum rate of 85% of new members with PCP designation by their effective date of enrollment.
Penalty for noncompliance: If an MCP is noncompliant with the standard, ODJFS will impose a monetary sanction of one-half of one percent the current month’s premium payment. Once the MCP is performing at standard levels and violations/deficiencies are resolved to the satisfaction of ODJFS, the money will be refunded. As stipulated in OAC rule 5101:3-26-08.2, each new member must have a designated primary care provider (PCP) prior to their effective date of coverage. Therefore, MCPs are subject to additional corrective action measures under Appendix N, Compliance Assessment System, for failure to meet this requirement.
Appendix L
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
5. APPEALS AND GRIEVANCES DATA
Pursuant to OAC rule 5101:3-26-08.4, MCPs are required to submit information at least monthly to ODJFS regarding appeal and grievance activity. ODJFS requires these submissions to be in an electronic data file format pursuant to the Appeal File and Submission Specifications and Grievance File and Submission Specifications.
The appeal data file and the grievance data file must include all appeal and grievance activity, respectively, for the previous month, and must be submitted by the ODJFS-specified due date.
These data files must be submitted in the ODJFS-specified format and with the ODJFS-specified filename in order to be successfully processed.
Penalty for noncompliance: MCPs who fail to submit their monthly electronic data files to the ODJFS by the specified due date or who fail to resubmit, by no later than the end of that month, a file which meets the data quality requirements will be subject to penalty as stipulated under the Compliance Assessment System (Appendix N).
6. NOTES
6.a. | Penalties, Including Monetary Sanctions, for Noncompliance |
Penalties for noncompliance with standards outlined in this appendix, including monetary sanctions, will be imposed as the results are finalized. With the exception of Sections 1.a.i., 1.a.iii., 1.a.v., 1.a.iv, and 1.b.ii, no monetary sanctions described in this appendix will be imposed if the MCP is in its first contract year of Medicaid program participation. Notwithstanding the penalties specified in this Appendix, ODJFS reserves the right to apply the most appropriate penalty to the area of deficiency identified when an MCP is determined to be noncompliant with a standard. Monetary penalties for noncompliance with any individual measure, as determined in this appendix, shall not exceed $300,000 during each evaluation period.
Refundable monetary sanctions will be based on the premium payment in the month of the cited deficiency and due within 30 days of notification by ODJFS to the MCP of the amount.
Any monies collected through the imposition of such a sanction will be returned to the MCP (minus any applicable collection fees owed to the Attorney General’s Office, if the MCP has been delinquent in submitting payment) after the MCP has demonstrated full compliance with the particular program requirement and the violations/deficiencies are resolved to the satisfaction of ODJFS. If an MCP does not comply within two years of the date of notification of noncompliance, then the monies will not be refunded.
Appendix L
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
6.b. Combined Remedies
If ODJFS determines that one systemic problem is responsible for multiple deficiencies, ODJFS may impose a combined remedy which will address all areas of deficient performance. The total fines assessed in any one month will not exceed 15% of the MCP’s monthly premium payment.
6.c. Membership Freezes
MCPs found to have a pattern of repeated or ongoing noncompliance may be subject to a membership freeze.
6.d. Reconsideration
Requests for reconsideration of monetary sanctions and enrollment freezes may be submitted as provided in Appendix N, Compliance Assessment System.
6.e. Contract Termination, Nonrenewals, or Denials
Upon termination either by the MCP or ODJFS, nonrenewal, or denial of an MCP provider agreement, all previously collected refundable monetary sanctions will be retained by ODJFS.
Appendix M
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
APPENDIX M
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
CFC ELIGIBLE POPULATION
This appendix establishes minimum performance standards for managed care plans (MCPs) in key program areas. The intent is to maintain accountability for contract requirements. Standards are subject to change based on the revision or update of applicable national standards, methods or benchmarks. Performance will be evaluated in the categories of Quality of Care, Access, Consumer Satisfaction, and Administrative Capacity. Each performance measure has an accompanying minimum performance standard. MCPs with performance levels below the minimum performance standards will be required to take corrective action.
With the statewide expansion of the Ohio Medicaid Managed Care Program for the Covered Families and Children (CFC) population nearly complete, evaluation of performance will transition to a statewide approach encompassing all members who meet the criteria specified per the given methodology for each measure (i.e., measures will include members in any county who meet criteria per the given methodology as opposed to only those members with managed care membership as of February 1, 2006).
The statewide approach was implemented beginning January 1, 2008. Unless otherwise noted, performance measures and standards (see Sections 1, 2, 3 and 4 of this appendix) will be applicable for all counties in which the MCP has membership as of February 1, 2006, until statewide measurement is implemented.
Selected measures in this appendix will be used to determine pay-for-performance (P4P) as specified in Appendix O, Pay for Performance.
1. QUALITY OF CARE
1.a. Independent External Quality Review
In accordance with federal law and regulations, state Medicaid agencies must annually provide for an external quality review of the quality outcomes and timeliness of, and access to, services provided by Medicaid-contracting MCPs [(42 CFR 438.204(d)]. The external review assists the state in assuring MCP compliance with program requirements and facilitates the collection of accurate and reliable information concerning MCP performance.
Measure: The independent external quality review covers a review of clinical and non-clinical performance as outlined in Appendix K.
Report Period: Performance will be evaluated using the reviews conducted during SFY 2008.
Appendix M
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
Action Required for Deficiencies: For all reviews conducted during the contract period, if the EQRO cites a deficiency in performance, the MCP will be required to complete a Corrective Action Plan or Quality Improvement Directive depending on the severity of the deficiency.
Serious deficiencies may result in immediate termination or non-renewal of the provider agreement.
1.b. Children with Special Health Care Needs (CSHCN)
In order to ensure state compliance with the provisions of 42 CFR 438.208, the Bureau of Managed Health Care established Children with Special Health Care Needs (CSHCN) basic program requirements in Appendix G, Coverage and Services, and corresponding minimum performance standards as described below. The purpose of these measures is to provide appropriate and targeted case management services to CSHCN.
1.b.i. Case Management of Children (applicable to performance evaluation through December 2007 and P4P through SFY 2009)
Measure: The average monthly case management rate for children under 21 years of age.
Report Period: For the SFY 2008 contract period: July – September 2007 and October – December 2007 (for evaluation); and April – June 2008 (for P4P) report periods. For the SFY 2009 contract period: April – June 2009 (for P4P) report periods.
County-Based Approach: MCPs with managed care membership as of February 1, 2006 will be evaluated using their county-based statewide result until regional evaluation is implemented for the county’s applicable region. The county-based statewide result will include data for all counties in which the MCP had membership as of February 1, 2006 that are not included in any regional-based result. Regional-based results will not be used for evaluation until all selected MCPs in an active region have at least 10,000 members during each month of the entire report period. Upon implementation of regional-based evaluation for a particular county’s region, the county will be included in the MCP’s regional-based result and will no longer be included in the MCP’s county-based statewide result. [Example: The county-based statewide result for MCP AAA, which has contracts in the Central and West Central regions, will include Franklin, Pickaway, Montgomery, Greene and Clark counties (i.e., counties in which MCP AAA had managed care membership as of February 1, 2006). When regional-based evaluation is implemented for the Central region, Franklin and Pickaway counties, along with all other counties in the region, will then be included in the Central region results for MCP AAA; Montgomery, Greene, and Clark counties will remain in the county-based statewide result for evaluation of MCP AAA until the West Central regional-based approach is implemented.] The last report period using the MCP’s county-based statewide result for the counties in which the MCP had membership as of February 1, 2006 for P4P (Appendix O) is April-June 2009. A detailed description of the of excellent and superior standards associated with this measure for P4P determination for SFY 2008 and SFY 2009 can be found in Appendix O, Section 1.b1 and Section 2.b1.
Regional-Based Approach: MCPs will be evaluated by region, using results for all counties included in the region. Performance will begin to be evaluated using regional-based results for any active region in which all selected MCPs had at least 10,000 members during each month of the entire report period.
Appendix M
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
County and Regional-Based Minimum Performance Standard: For the third and fourth quarters of SFY 2007, a case management rate of 5.0%. For the first and second quarters of SFY 2008, a case management rate of 5.0%.
Penalty for Noncompliance: The first time an MCP is noncompliant with a standard for this measure, ODJFS will issue a Sanction Advisory informing the MCP that any future noncompliance instances with the standard for this measure will result in ODJFS imposing a monetary sanction. Upon all subsequent measurements of performance, if an MCP is again determined to be noncompliant with the standard, ODJFS will impose a monetary sanction (see Section 5) of two percent of the current month’s premium payment. Monetary sanctions will not be levied for consecutive quarters that an MCP is determined to be noncompliant. If an MCP is noncompliant for a subsequent quarter, new member selection freezes or a reduction of assignments will occur as outlined in Appendix N of the Provider Agreement. Once the MCP is determined to be compliant with the standard and the violations/deficiencies are resolved to the satisfaction of ODJFS, the penalties will be lifted, if applicable, and monetary sanctions will be returned.
1.b.ii. Case Management of Children (applicable to performance evaluation as of January, 2008 and P4P as of SFY 2010)
Measure: The average monthly case management rate for children under 21 years of age.
Report Period: For the SFY 2008 contract period, January – March 2008, and April – June 2008 report periods. For the SFY 2009 contract period, July – September 2008, October – December 2008, January – March 2009, and April – June 2009 report periods. For the SFY 2010 contract period, July – September 2009, October – December 2009, January – March 2010, and April – June 2010 report periods.
Regional-Based Statewide Approach: Performance will be evaluated using a regional-based statewide approach for all active regions and counties (Mahoning and Trumbull) in which the MCP has membership.
Regional-Based Statewide Target: For the third and fourth quarters of SFY 2008, a case management rate of 5.0%. For SFY 2009, a case management rate of 5.0%. For SFY 2010, a case management rate of 5.0%.
Regional-Based Statewide Minimum Performance Standard: The level of improvement must result in at least a 20% decrease in the difference between the target and the previous report period’s results.
Penalty for Noncompliance: The first time an MCP is noncompliant with a standard for this measure, ODJFS will issue a Sanction Advisory informing the MCP that any future noncompliance instances with the standard for this measure will result in ODJFS imposing a monetary sanction. Upon all subsequent measurements of performance, if an MCP is again determined to be noncompliant with the standard, ODJFS will impose a monetary sanction (see Section 5) of two percent of the current month’s premium payment. Monetary sanctions will not be levied for consecutive quarters that an MCP is determined to be noncompliant. If an MCP is noncompliant for a subsequent quarter, new member selection freezes or a reduction of assignments will occur as outlined in Appendix N of the Provider Agreement. Once the MCP is determined to be compliant with the standard and the violations/deficiencies are resolved to the satisfaction of ODJFS, the penalties will be lifted, if applicable, and monetary sanctions will be returned.
Appendix M
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
1.b.iii. Case Management of Children with an ODJFS-Mandated Condition (applicable to performance evaluation through December 2007)
Measure 1: The percent of children under 21 years of age with a positive identification through an ODJFS administrative review of data for the ODJFS-mandated case management condition of asthma that are case managed.
Measure 2: The percent of children age 17 and under with a positive identification through an ODJFS administrative review of data for the ODJFS-mandated case management condition of teenage pregnancy that are case managed.
Measure 3: The percent of children under 21 years of age with a positive identification through an ODJFS administrative review of data for the ODJFS-mandated case management condition of HIV/AIDS that are case managed.
Report Periods for Measures 1, 2, and 3: For the SFY 2008 contract period, July – September 2007 and October – December 2007 report periods.
County-Based Approach: MCPs with managed care membership as of February 1, 2006 will be evaluated using their county-based statewide result until regional evaluation is implemented for the county’s applicable region. The county-based statewide result will include data for all counties in which the MCP had membership as of February 1, 2006 that are not included in any regional-based result. Regional-based results will not be used for evaluation until all selected MCPs in an active region have at least 10,000 members during each month of the entire report period. Upon implementation of regional-based evaluation for a particular county’s region, the county will be included in the MCP’s regional-based result and will no longer be included in the MCP’s county-based statewide result. [Example: The county-based statewide result for MCP AAA, which has contracts in the Central and West Central regions, will include Franklin, Pickaway, Montgomery, Greene and Clark counties (i.e., counties in which MCP AAA had managed care membership as of February 1, 2006). When regional-based evaluation is implemented for the Central region, Franklin and Pickaway counties, along with all other counties in the region, will then be included in the Central region results for MCP AAA; Montgomery, Greene, and Clark counties will remain in the county-based statewide result for evaluation of MCP AAA until the West Central regional-based approach is implemented.]
Regional-Based Approach: MCPs will be evaluated by region, using results for all counties included in the region. Performance will begin to be evaluated using regional-based results for any active region in which all selected MCPs had at least 10,000 members during each month of the entire report period.
Appendix M
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
County and Regional-Based Minimum Performance Standard for Measures 1 and 3: For the third and fourth quarters of SFY 2007, a case management rate of 70%. For the first and second quarters of SFY 2008, a case management rate of 70%.
County and Regional-Based Minimum Performance Standard for Measure 2: For the first and second quarters of SFY 2008, a case management rate of 60%.
Penalty for Noncompliance for Measures 1 and 2: The first time an MCP is noncompliant with a standard for this measure, ODJFS will issue a Sanction Advisory informing the MCP that any future noncompliance instances with the standard for this measure will result in ODJFS imposing a monetary sanction. Upon all subsequent measurements of performance, if an MCP is again determined to be noncompliant with the standard, ODJFS will impose a monetary sanction (see Section 5) of two percent of the current month’s premium payment. Monetary sanctions will not be levied for consecutive quarters that an MCP is determined to be noncompliant. If an MCP is noncompliant for a subsequent quarter, new member selection freezes or a reduction of assignments will occur as outlined in Appendix N of the Provider Agreement. Once the MCP is determined to be compliant with the standard and the violations/deficiencies are resolved to the satisfaction of ODJFS, the penalties will be lifted, if applicable, and monetary sanctions will be returned. Note: For the first reporting period during which regional results are used to evaluate performance, measures 1, 2, and 3 are reporting-only measures. For SFY 2008, measure 3 is a reporting-only measure.
1.b.iv. Case Management of Children with an ODJFS-Mandated Condition (applicable to performance evaluation as of January 2008)
Measure 1: The percent of children under 21 years of age with a positive identification through an ODJFS administrative review of data for the ODJFS-mandated case management condition of asthma that are case managed.
Measure 2: The percent of children under 21 years of age with a positive identification through an ODJFS administrative review of data for the ODJFS-mandated case management condition of HIV/AIDS that are case managed.
Report Periods for Measures 1 and 2: For the SFY 2008 contract period, January – March 2008, and April – June 2008 report periods. For the SFY 2009 contract period, July – September 2008, October – December 2008, January – March 2009, and April – June 2009 report periods. For the SFY 2010 contract period, July – September 2009, October – December 2009, January – March 2010, and April – June 2010 report periods.
Regional-Based Statewide Approach: Performance will be evaluated using a regional-based statewide approach for all active regions and counties (Mahoning and Trumbull) in which the MCP has membership.
Appendix M
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
Regional-Based Statewide Target for Measures 1 and 2: For the third and fourth quarters of SFY 2008, a case management rate of 70.0%. For SFY 2009, a case management rate of 80.0%. For SFY 2010, a case management rate of 80.0%.
Regional-Based Statewide Minimum Performance Standard for Measures 1 and 2: The level of improvement must result in at least a 20% decrease in the difference between the target and the previous report period’s results.
Penalty for Noncompliance for Measure 1: The first time an MCP is noncompliant with a standard for this measure, ODJFS will issue a Sanction Advisory informing the MCP that any future noncompliance instances with the standard for this measure will result in ODJFS imposing a monetary sanction. Upon all subsequent measurements of performance, if an MCP is again determined to be noncompliant with the standard, ODJFS will impose a monetary sanction (see Section 5) of two percent of the current month’s premium payment. Monetary sanctions will not be levied for consecutive quarters that an MCP is determined to be noncompliant. If an MCP is noncompliant for a subsequent quarter, new member selection freezes or a reduction of assignments will occur as outlined in Appendix N of the Provider Agreement. Once the MCP is determined to be compliant with the standard and the violations/deficiencies are resolved to the satisfaction of ODJFS, the penalties will be lifted, if applicable, and monetary sanctions will be returned. For SFY 2008 and SFY 2009, measure 2 is a reporting-only measure.
1.c. Clinical Performance Measures
MCP performance will be assessed based on the analysis of submitted encounter data for each year. For certain measures, standards are established; the identification of these standards is not intended to limit the assessment of other indicators for performance improvement activities. Performance on multiple measures will be assessed and reported to the MCPs and others, including Medicaid consumers.
The clinical performance measures described below closely follow the National Committee for Quality Assurance’s Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS). Minor adjustments to HEDIS measures are required to account for the differences between the commercial population and the Medicaid population, such as shorter and interrupted enrollment periods. NCQA may annually change its method for calculating a measure. These changes can make it difficult to evaluate whether improvement occurred from a prior year. For this reason, ODJFS will use the same methods to calculate the baseline results and the results for the period in which the MCP is being held accountable. For example, the same methods were being used to calculate calendar year 2005 results (the baseline period) and calendar year 2006 results. The methods will be updated and a new baseline will be created during 2007 for calendar year 2006 results. These results will then serve as the baseline to evaluate whether improvement occurred from calendar year 2006 to calendar year 2007. Clinical performance measure results will be calculated after a sufficient amount of time has passed after the end of the report period in order to allow for claims runout. For a comprehensive description of the clinical performance measures below, see ODJFS Methods for Clinical Performance Measures for the CFC Managed Care Program. Performance standards are subject to change based on the revision or update of NCQA methods or other national standards, methods or benchmarks.
Appendix M
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
For an MCP which had membership as of February 1, 2006: MCP performance will be evaluated using an MCP’s county-based statewide result for the counties in which the MCP had membership as of February 1, 2006. For reporting period CY 2008, targets and performance standards for Clinical Performance Measures in this Appendix (1.c.i – 1.c.vii) will be applicable to all counties in which MCPs had membership as of February 1, 2006. The final reporting year for the counties in which an MCP had membership as of February 1, 2006, will be CY 2008.
For any MCP which did not have membership as of February 1, 2006: Performance will be evaluated using a regional-based statewide approach for all active regions and counties (Trumbull and Mahoning) in which the MCP has membership.
Regional-Based Statewide Approach: MCPs will be evaluated statewide, using results for all active regions and counties (Mahoning and Trumbull) in which the MCP has membership.
For measures requiring one year of baseline data, ODJFS will use the first full calendar year of data (CY 2007) from all MCPs serving CFC membership. CY 2008 will be the first reporting year that MCPs will be held accountable to the statewide performance standards for one year measures, and penalties will be applied for noncompliance.
For measures requiring two years of baseline data, ODJFS will use the first two full calendar years of data (CY 2007 and CY 2008) from all MCPs serving CFC membership to determine statewide minimum performance standards. CY 2009 will be the first reporting year that MCPs will be held accountable to the statewide performance standards for two year measures, and penalties will be applied for noncompliance.
Statewide performance measure results will be calculated after a sufficient amount of time has passed after the end of the report period in order to allow for claims runout.
Report Period: In order to adhere to the statewide expansion timeline, reporting periods. For the SFY 2008 contract period, performance will be evaluated using the January - December 2007 report period. For the SFY 2009 contract period, performance will be evaluated using the January - December 2008 report period. For the SFY 2010 contract period, performance will be evaluated using the January – December 2009 report period.
1.c.i. Perinatal Care – Frequency of Ongoing Prenatal Care
Measure: The percentage of enrolled women with a live birth during the year who received the expected number of prenatal visits. The number of observed versus expected visits will be adjusted for length of enrollment.
County-Based Statewide Target: At least 80.0% of the eligible population must receive 81.0% or more of the expected number of prenatal visits.
Appendix M
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
County-Based Statewide Minimum Performance Standard: The level of improvement must result in at least a 10.0% decrease in the difference between the target and the previous report period’s results. (For example, if last year’s results were 20.0%, then the difference between the target and last year’s results is 60.0%. In this example, the standard is an improvement in performance of 10.0% of this difference or 6.0%. In this example, results of 26.0% or better would be compliant with the standard.)
Regional-Based Statewide Target: To be determined.
Regional-Based Statewide Minimum Performance Standard: To be determined.
Action Required for Noncompliance: Beginning SFY 2009, if the standard is not met and the results are below 44.0% (49.0% for SFY 2010), the MCP is required to complete a Corrective Action Plan to address the area of noncompliance. If the standard is not met and the results are at or above 44.0% (49.0% for SFY 2010), ODJFS will issue a Quality Improvement Directive which will notify the MCP of noncompliance and may outline the steps that the MCP must take to improve the results.
1.c.ii. Perinatal Care - Initiation of Prenatal Care
Measure: The percentage of enrolled women with a live birth during the year who had a prenatal visit within 42 days of enrollment or by the end of the first trimester for those women who enrolled in the MCP during the early stages of pregnancy.
County-Based Statewide Target: At least 90.0% of the eligible population initiates prenatal care within the specified time.
County-Based Statewide Minimum Performance Standard: The level of improvement must result in at least a 10.0% decrease in the difference between the target and the previous year’s results.
Regional-Based Statewide Target: To be determined.
Regional-Based Statewide Minimum Performance Standard: To be determined.
Action Required for Noncompliance: Beginning SFY 2009, if the standard is not met and the results are below 74.0%(77.0% for SFY 2010), the MCP is required to complete a Corrective Action Plan to address the area of noncompliance. If the standard is not met and the results are at or above 74.0% (77.0% for SFY 2010), ODJFS will issue a Quality Improvement Directive which will notify the MCP of noncompliance and may outline the steps that the MCP must take to improve the results.
Appendix M
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
1.c.iii. Perinatal Care - Postpartum Care
Measure: The percentage of women who delivered a live birth who had a postpartum visit on or between 21 days and 56 days after delivery.
County-Based Statewide Target: At least 80.0% of the eligible population must receive a postpartum visit.
County-Based Statewide Minimum Performance Standard: The level of improvement must result in at least a 5.0% decrease in the difference between the target and the previous year’s results.
Regional-Based Statewide Target: To be determined.
Regional-Based Statewide Minimum Performance Standard: To be determined.
Action Required for Noncompliance: SFY 2009, if the standard is not met and the results are below 50.0% (54.0% for SFY 2010), the MCP is required to complete a Corrective Action Plan to address the area of noncompliance. If the standard is not met and the results are at or above 50.0% (54.0% for SFY 2010), ODJFS will issue a Quality Improvement Directive which will notify the MCP of noncompliance and may outline the steps that the MCP must take to improve the results.
1.c.iv. Preventive Care for Children - Well-Child Visits
Measure: The percentage of children who received the expected number of well-child visits adjusted by age and enrollment. The expected number of visits is as follows:
Children who turn 15 months old: six or more well-child visits.
Children who were 3, 4, 5, or 6, years old: one or more well-child visits.
Children who were 12 through 21 years old: one or more well-child visits.
County-Based Statewide Target: At least 80.0% of the eligible children receive the expected number of well-child visits.
County-Based Statewide Minimum Performance Standard for Each of the Age Groups: The level of improvement must result in at least a 10.0% decrease in the difference between the target and the previous year’s results.
Regional-Based Statewide Target: To be determined.
Regional-Based Statewide Minimum Performance Standard for Each of the Age Groups: To be determined.
Appendix M
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
Action Required for Noncompliance (15 month old age group): Beginning SFY 2009, if the standard is not met and the results are below 42.0% (47.0% for SFY 2010), the MCP is required to complete a Corrective Action Plan to address the area of noncompliance. If the standard is not met and the results are at or above 42.0% (47.0% for SFY 2010), ODJFS will issue a Quality Improvement Directive which will notify the MCP of noncompliance and may outline the steps that the MCP must take to improve the results.
Action Required for Noncompliance (3-6 year old age group): Beginning SFY 2009, if the standard is not met and the results are below 57.0% (63.0% for SFY 2010), the MCP is required to complete a Corrective Action Plan to address the area of noncompliance. If the standard is not met and the results are at or above 57.0% (63.0% for SFY 2010), ODJFS will issue a Quality Improvement Directive which will notify the MCP of noncompliance and may outline the steps that the MCP must take to improve the results.
Action Required for Noncompliance (12-21 year old age group): Beginning SFY 2009, if the standard is not met and the results are below 33.0% (35.0% for SFY 2010), the MCP is required to complete a Corrective Action Plan to address the area of noncompliance. If the standard is not met and the results are at or above 33.0% (35.0% for SFY 2010), ODJFS will issue a Quality Improvement Directive which will notify the MCP of noncompliance and may outline the steps that the MCP must take to improve the results.
1.c.v. Use of Appropriate Medications for People with Asthma
Measure: The percentage of members with persistent asthma who were enrolled for at least 11 months with the plan during the year and who received prescribed medications acceptable as primary therapy for long-term control of asthma.
County-Based Statewide Target: At least 95.0% of the eligible population must receive the recommended medications.
County-Based Statewide Minimum Performance Standard: The level of improvement must result in at least a 10.0% decrease in the difference between the target and the previous year’s results.
Regional-Based Statewide Target: To be determined.
Regional-Based Statewide Minimum Performance Standard: To be determined.
Appendix M
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
Action Required for Noncompliance: Beginning SFY 2009, if the standard is not met and the results are below 84.0% (86.0% for SFY 2010), the MCP is required to complete a Corrective Action Plan to address the area of noncompliance. If the standard is not met and the results are at or above 84.0% (86.0% for SFY 2010), ODJFS will issue a Quality Improvement Directive which will notify the MCP of noncompliance and may outline the steps that the MCP must take to improve the results.
1.c.vi. Annual Dental Visits
Measure: The percentage of enrolled members age 4 through 21 who were enrolled for at least 11 months with the plan during the year and who had at least one dental visit during the year.
County-Based Statewide Target: At least 60.0% of the eligible population receives a dental visit.
County-Based Statewide Minimum Performance Standard: The level of improvement must result in at least a 10.0% decrease in the difference between the target and the previous year’s results.
Regional-Based Statewide Target: To be determined.
Regional-Based Statewide Minimum Performance Standard: To be determined.
Action Required for Noncompliance: Beginning SFY 2009, if the standard is not met and the results are below 42.0% (43.0% for SFY 2010), the MCP is required to complete a Corrective Action Plan to address the area of noncompliance. If the standard is not met and the results are at or above 42.0% (43.0% for SFY 2010), ODJFS will issue a Quality Improvement Directive which will notify the MCP of noncompliance and may outline the steps that the MCP must take to improve the results.
Appendix M
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
1.c.vii. Lead Screening (For 1 Year Olds and For 2 Year Olds)
The final report period for these measures is CY 2008.
Measure: The percentage of one and two year olds who received a blood lead screening by age group.
County-Based Statewide Target: At least 80.0% of the eligible population receives a blood lead screening.
County-Based Statewide Minimum Performance Standard for Each of the Age Groups: The level of improvement must result in at least a 10.0% decrease in the difference between the target and the previous year’s results.
Regional-Based Statewide Target: To be determined.
Regional-Based Statewide Minimum Performance Standard for Each of the Age Groups: To be determined.
Action Required for Noncompliance (1 year olds): Beginning SFY 2007, if the standard is not met and the results are below 45.0% the MCP is required to complete a Corrective Action Plan to address the area of noncompliance. If the standard is not met and the results are at or above 45.0%, ODJFS will issue a Quality Improvement Directive which will notify the MCP of noncompliance and may outline the steps that the MCP must take to improve the results.
Action Required for Noncompliance (2 year olds): Beginning SFY 2007, if the standard is not met and the results are below 28.0% the MCP is required to complete a Corrective Action Plan to address the area of noncompliance. If the standard is not met and the results are at or above 28.0%, ODJFS will issue a Quality Improvement Directive which will notify the MCP of noncompliance and may outline the steps that the MCP must take to improve the results.
Appendix M
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
1.c.viii. Lead Testing in Children
The initial report period for this measure is CY 2009 (SFY 2010). This measure will replace the
Lead Screening for 1 Year Olds and for 2 Year Olds the P4P for SFY 2010.
Measure: The percentage of children who have turned two years of age during the reporting year who have received one lead test on or before their second birthday.
Regional-Based Statewide Target: To be determined.
Regional-Based Statewide Minimum Performance Standard: To be determined.
Action Required for Noncompliance: Beginning SFY 2010, if the standard is not met and the results are below TBD% the MCP is required to complete a Corrective Action Plan to address the area of noncompliance. If the standard is not met and the results are at or above TBD%, ODJFS will issue a Quality Improvement Directive which will notify the MCP of noncompliance and may outline the steps that the MCP must take to improve the results.
2. ACCESS
Performance in the Access category will be determined by the following measures: Primary Care Provider (PCP) Turnover, Children’s Access to Primary Care, Adults’ Access to Preventive/Ambulatory Health Services, and Members’ Access to Designated PCP. For a comprehensive description of the access performance measures below, see ODJFS Methods for Access Performance Measures for the CFC Managed Care Program.
2.a. PCP Turnover
A high PCP turnover rate may affect continuity of care and may signal poor management of providers. However, some turnover may be expected when MCPs end contracts with providers who are not adhering to the MCP’s standard of care. Therefore, this measure is used in conjunction with the children and adult access measures to assess performance in the access category.
Measure: The percentage of primary care providers affiliated with the MCP as of the beginning of the measurement year who were not affiliated with the MCP as of the end of the year.
For an MCP which had membership as of February 1, 2006: MCP performance will be evaluated using an MCP’s county-based statewide result for the counties in which the MCP had membership as of February 1, 2006. The minimum performance standard in this Appendix (2.a) will be applicable to the MCP’s county-based statewide result for the counties in which the MCP had membership as of February 1, 2006. The last reporting year using the MCP’s county-based statewide result for the counties in which the MCP had membership as of February 1, 2006 for performance evaluation is CY 2007; the last reporting year using the MCP’s county-based statewide result for the counties in which the MCP had membership as of February 1, 2006 for P4P (Appendix O) is CY 2008.
Appendix M
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
For any MCP which did not have membership as of February 1, 2006: Performance will be evaluated using a regional-based statewide approach for all active regions and counties (Mahoning and Trumbull) in which the MCP has membership.
Regional-Based Statewide Approach: MCPs will be evaluated statewide, using results for all regions and counties (Mahoning and Trumbull) in which the MCP has membership. ODJFS will use the first full calendar year of data (CY 2007) from all MCPs serving CFC membership as a baseline to determine a statewide minimum performance standard. CY 2008 will be the first reporting year that MCPs will be held accountable to the statewide performance standard for statewide reporting, and penalties will be applied for noncompliance.
Report Period: For the SFY 2008 contract period, performance will be evaluated using the January - December 2007 report period. For the SFY 2009 contract period, performance will be evaluated using the January - December 2008 report period. For the SFY 2010 contract period, performance will be evaluated using the January - December 2008 report period.
County-Based Statewide Minimum Performance Standard: A maximum PCP Turnover rate of 18.0%.
Regional-Based Statewide Minimum Performance Standard: To be determined.
Action Required for Noncompliance: MCPs are required to perform a causal analysis of the high PCP turnover rate and assess the impact on timely access to health services, including continuity of care. If access has been reduced or coordination of care affected, then the MCP must develop and implement a corrective action plan to address the findings.
2.b.i. Children’s Access to Primary Care (applicable to performance evaluation through SFY 2010)
This measure indicates whether children aged 12 months to 11 years are accessing PCPs for sick or well-child visits.
Measure: The percentage of members age 12 months to 11 years who had a visit with an MCP PCP-type provider.
For an MCP which had membership as of February 1, 2006: MCP performance will be evaluated using an MCP’s county-based statewide result for the counties in which the MCP had membership as of February 1, 2006. The minimum performance standard in this Appendix (2.b) will be applicable to the MCP’s county-based statewide result for the counties in which the MCP had membership as of February 1, 2006. The last reporting year using the MCP’s county-based statewide result for the counties in which the MCP had membership as of February 1, 2006 is CY 2008.
Appendix M
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
For any MCP which did not have membership as of February 1, 2006: Performance will be evaluated using a regional-based statewide approach for all active regions and counties (Mahoning and Trumbull) in which the MCP has membership.
Regional-Based Statewide Approach: MCPs will be evaluated statewide, using results for all active regions and counties (Mahoning and Trumbull) in which the MCP has membership. ODJFS will use the first two full calendar years of data (CY 2007 and CY 2008) from all MCPs serving CFC membership as a baseline to determine a statewide minimum performance standard. CY 2009 will be the first reporting year that MCPs will be held accountable to the statewide performance standard for statewide reporting, and penalties will be applied for noncompliance. Statewide performance measure results will be calculated after a sufficient amount of time has passed after the end of the report period in order to allow for claims runout.
Report Period: For the SFY 2008 contract period, performance will be evaluated using the January - December 2007 report period. For the SFY 2009 contract period, performance will be evaluated using the January - December 2008 report period. For the SFY 2010 contract period, performance will be evaluated using the January – December 2009 report period.
County-Based Statewide Minimum Performance Standards:
CY 2007 report period – 71.0% of children must receive a visit
CY 2008 report period – 74.0% of children must receive a visit
Regional-Based Statewide Minimum Performance Standards:
CY 2009 report period – To be determined.
2.b.ii. Children’s Access to Primary Care (applicable to performance evaluation as of SFY 2011)
This measure indicates whether children aged 12 months to 19 years are accessing PCPs for sick or well-child visits.
Measure: The percentage of members age 12 months to 19 years who had a visit with an MCP PCP-type provider.
Regional-Based Statewide Approach: MCPs will be evaluated statewide, using results for all active regions and counties in which the MCP has membership. ODJFS will use CY 2008 and CY 2009 data from all MCPs serving CFC membership as a baseline to determine a statewide minimum performance standard. CY 2010 will be the first reporting year that MCPs will be held accountable to the statewide performance standard for statewide reporting, and penalties will be applied for noncompliance. Statewide performance measure results will be calculated after a sufficient amount of time has passed after the end of the report period in order to allow for claims run out.
Report Period: For the SFY 2011 contract period, performance will be evaluated using the January - December 2010 report period.
Regional-Based Statewide Minimum Performance Standards: CY 2010 report period – To be determined.
Penalty for Noncompliance: If an MCP is noncompliant with the Minimum Performance Standard, then the MCP must develop and implement a corrective action plan.
Appendix M
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
2.c. Adults’ Access to Preventive/Ambulatory Health Services
This measure indicates whether adult members are accessing health services.
Measure: The percentage of members age 20 and older who had an ambulatory or preventive-care visit.
For an MCP which had membership as of February 1, 2006: MCP performance will be evaluated using an MCP’s county-based statewide result for the counties in which the MCP had membership as of February 1, 2006. The minimum performance standard in this Appendix (2.c) will be applicable to the MCP’s county-based statewide result for the counties in which the MCP had membership as of February 1, 2006. The last reporting year using the MCP’s county-based statewide result for the counties in which the MCP had membership as of February 1, 2006 for performance evaluation is CY 2007; the last reporting year using the MCP’s county-based statewide result for the counties in which the MCP had membership as of February 1, 2006 for P4P (Appendix O) is CY 2008.
For any MCP which did not have membership as of February 1, 2006: Performance will be evaluated using a regional-based statewide approach for all active regions and counties (Mahoning and Trumbull) in which the MCP has membership.
Regional-Based Statewide Approach: MCPs will be evaluated statewide, using results for all active regions and counties (Mahoning and Trumbull) in which the MCP has membership. ODJFS will use the first full calendar year of data (CY 2007) from all MCPs serving CFC membership as a baseline to determine a statewide minimum performance standard. CY 2008 will be the first reporting year that MCPs will be held accountable to the statewide performance standard for statewide reporting, and penalties will be applied for noncompliance. Statewide performance measure results will be calculated after a sufficient amount of time has passed after the end of the report period in order to allow for claims runout.
Report Period: For the SFY 2008 contract period, performance will be evaluated using the January - December 2007 report period. For the SFY 2009 contract period, performance will be evaluated using the January - December 2008 report period. For the SFY 2010 contract period, performance will be evaluated using the January - December 2009 report period.
County-Based Statewide Minimum Performance Standards:
CY 2007 report period – 63.0% of adults must receive a visit.
CY 2008 report period – 63.0% of adults must receive a visit (P4P only).
Regional-Based Statewide Minimum Performance Standards:
CY 2008 report period – To be determined. (Evaluation only)
CY 2009 report period –To be determined
Penalty for Noncompliance: If an MCP is noncompliant with the Minimum Performance Standard, then the MCP must develop and implement a corrective action plan.
Appendix M
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
2.d. Members’ Access to Designated PCP
The MCP must encourage and assist CFC members without a designated primary care provider (PCP) to establish such a relationship, so that a designated PCP can coordinate and manage a member’s health care needs. This measure is to be used to assess MCPs’ performance in the access category.
Measure: The percentage of members who had a visit through members’ designated PCPs.
Regional-Based Statewide Approach: MCPs will be evaluated statewide, using results for all active regions and counties (Mahoning and Trumbull) in which the MCP has membership. ODJFS will use the first full calendar year of data (CY 2007) from all MCPs serving CFC membership as a baseline to determine a statewide minimum performance standard. CY 2008 will be the first reporting year that MCPs will be held accountable to the performance standard and penalties will be applied for noncompliance. Statewide performance measure results will be calculated after a sufficient amount of time has passed after the end of the report period in order to allow for claims runout.
Report Period: For the SFY 2009 contract period, performance will be evaluated using the January - December 2008 report period. For the SFY 2010 contract period, performance will be evaluated using the January - December 2009 report period.
Regional-Based Statewide Minimum Performance Standard:
CY 2008 – To be determined.
CY 2009 – To be determined
Penalty for Noncompliance: If an MCP is noncompliant with the Minimum Performance Standard, then the MCP must develop and implement a corrective action plan.
3. CONSUMER SATISFACTION
In accordance with federal requirements and in the interest of assessing enrollee satisfaction with MCP performance, ODJFS conducts annual independent consumer satisfaction surveys. Results are used to assist in identifying and correcting MCP performance overall and in the areas of access, quality of care, and member services. For SFY 2008, performance in this category will be determined by the overall satisfaction score. For a comprehensive description of the Consumer Satisfaction performance measure below, see ODJFS Methods for the Consumer Satisfaction Performance Measure for the CFC Program.
Appendix M
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
Measure: Overall Satisfaction with MCP: The average rating of the respondents to the Consumer Satisfaction Survey who were asked to rate their overall satisfaction with their MCP. The results of this measure are reported annually.
For an MCP which had membership as of February 1, 2006: MCP performance will be evaluated using an MCP’s county-based statewide result for the counties in which the MCP had membership as of February 1, 2006. The minimum performance standard in this Appendix (3.) will be applicable to the MCP’s county-based statewide result for the counties in which the MCP had membership as of February 1, 2006. For performance evaluation, the last year to use the county-based statewide approach for the counties in which the MCP had membership as of February 1, 2006 will be SFY 2008, using CY 2008 data. For P4P (Appendix O), the last year to use the county-based statewide approach for the counties in which the MCP had membership as of February 1, 2006 will be SFY 2009, using CY 2009 data.
For any MCP which did not have membership as of February 1, 2006: Performance will be evaluated using a regional-based statewide approach for all active regions and counties (Mahoning and Trumbull) in which the MCP has membership.
Regional-Based Statewide Approach: MCPs will be evaluated statewide, using results for all active regions and counties (Mahoning and Trumbull) in which the MCP has membership. ODJFS will use the first full calendar year of data (CY 2008 adult and child survey results) from all MCPs serving CFC membership as a baseline to establish a measure and determine a minimum statewide performance standard. For performance evaluation, the first year to use the statewide regional-based approach will be SFY 2009, using CY 2009 data. For P4P (Appendix O), the first year to use the statewide regional-based approach will be SFY 2010, using CY 2010 data.
Report Period: For the SFY 2008 contract period, performance will be evaluated using the results from the CY 2008 consumer satisfaction survey. For the SFY 2009 contract period, performance will be evaluated using the results from the CY 2009 consumer satisfaction survey. For the SFY 2010 contract period, performance will be evaluated using the results from the CY 2010 consumer satisfaction survey.
County-Based Statewide Minimum Performance Standard: An average score of no less than 7.0.
Regional-Based Statewide Minimum Performance Standard: TBD
Penalty for noncompliance: If an MCP is determined noncompliant with the Minimum Performance Standard, then the MCP must develop a corrective action plan and provider agreement renewals may be affected.
4. ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY
The ability of an MCP to meet administrative requirements has been found to be both an indicator of current plan performance and a predictor of future performance. Deficiencies in administrative capacity make the accurate assessment of performance in other categories difficult, with findings uncertain. Performance in this category will be determined by the Compliance Assessment System, and the emergency department diversion program. For a comprehensive description of the Administrative Capacity performance measures below, see ODJFS Methods for the Administrative Capacity Performance Measure for the CFC Managed Care Program.
Appendix M
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
4.a. Compliance Assessment System
Measure: The number of points accumulated during a rolling 12-month period through the Compliance Assessment System.
Report Period: For the SFY 2009 contract period, performance will be evaluated using a rolling 12-month report period.
Performance Standard: A maximum of 15 points
Penalty for Noncompliance: Penalties for points are established in Appendix N, Compliance Assessment System.
4.b. Emergency Department Diversion (applicable to performance evaluation through SFY 2008)
Managed care plans must provide access to services in a way that assures access to primary and urgent care in the most effective settings and minimizes inappropriate utilization of emergency department (ED) services. MCPs are required to identify high utilizers of ED services and implement action plans designed to minimize inappropriate ED utilization.
Measure: The percentage of members who had four or more ED visits during the six month reporting period.
For an MCP which had membership as of February 1, 2006: MCP performance will be evaluated using an MCP’s county-based statewide result for the counties in which the MCP had membership as of February 1, 2006. The minimum performance standard and the target in this Appendix (4.b) will be applicable to the MCP’s county-based statewide result for the counties in which the MCP had membership as of February 1, 2006. The last reporting period using the MCP’s county-based statewide result for the counties in which the MCP had membership as of February 1, 2006 for performance evaluation is July-December 2007; the last reporting period using the MCP’s county-based statewide result for the counties in which the MCP had membership as of February 1, 2006 for P4P (Appendix O) is July-December 2006.
Report Period: For the SFY 2008 contract period, a baseline level of performance will be set using the January - June 2007 report period. Results will be calculated for the reporting period of July - December 2007 and compared to the baseline results to determine if the minimum performance standard is met.
Appendix M
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
County-Based Statewide Target: A maximum of 0.70% of the eligible population will have four or more ED visits during the reporting period.
County-Based Statewide Minimum Performance Standard: The level of improvement must result in at least a 10.0% decrease in the difference between the target and the baseline period results.
Penalty for Noncompliance: If the standard is not met and the results are above 1.1%, then the MCP must develop a corrective action plan, for which ODJFS may direct the MCP to develop the components of their EDD program as specified by ODJFS. If the standard is not met and the results are at or below 1.1%, then the MCP must develop a Quality Improvement Directive.
4.b.i. Emergency Department Diversion (applicable to performance evaluation as of SFY 2009)
Managed care plans must provide access to services in a way that assures access to primary and urgent care in the most effective settings and minimizes inappropriate utilization of emergency department (ED) services. MCPs are required to identify high utilizers of targeted ED services and implement action plans designed to minimize inappropriate, preventable and/or primary care sensitive ED utilization.
Measure: The percentage of members who had a number to be determined or more targeted ED visits during the twelve month reporting period.
Regional-Based Statewide Approach: MCPs will be evaluated statewide, using results for all active regions and counties (Mahoning and Trumbull) in which the MCP has membership. ODJFS will use the first full calendar year of data (CY 2007) from all MCPs serving CFC membership as the first baseline reporting year for statewide reporting and to determine a statewide minimum performance standard and target. CY 2008 will be the first reporting year that MCPs will be held accountable to the performance standard and penalties will be applied for noncompliance.
Report Period: For the SFY 2009 contract period, January – December 2008. For the SFY 2010 contract period, January – December 2008.
Regional-Based Statewide Target: A maximum number to be determined of the eligible population will have a number to be determined or more targeted ED visits during the reporting period.
Regional-Based Statewide Minimum Performance Standard: The level of improvement must result in at least a percent to be determined decrease in the difference between the target and the baseline period results.
Penalty for Noncompliance: If the standard is not met and the results are above a percent to be determined, then the MCP must develop a corrective action plan, for which ODJFS may direct the MCP to develop the components of their EDD program as specified by ODJFS. If the standard is not met and the results are at or below a percent to be determined, then the MCP must develop a Quality Improvement Directive.
Appendix M
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
5. NOTES
Given that unforeseen circumstances (e.g., revision or update of applicable national standards, methods or benchmarks, or issues related to program implementation) may impact performance assessment as specified in Sections 1 through 4, ODJFS reserves the right to apply the most appropriate penalty to the area of deficiency identified with any individual measure, notwithstanding the penalties specified in this Appendix.
5.a. Report Periods
Unless otherwise noted, the most recent report or study finalized prior to the end of the contract period will be used in determining the MCP’s performance level for that contract period.
5.b. Monetary Sanctions
Penalties for noncompliance with individual standards in this appendix will be imposed as the results are finalized. Penalties for noncompliance with individual standards for each period of compliance, as determined in this appendix, will not exceed $250,000.
Refundable monetary sanctions will be based on the capitation payment in the month of the cited deficiency and due within 30 days of notification by ODJFS to the MCP of the amount. Any monies collected through the imposition of such a sanction would be returned to the MCP (minus any applicable collection fees owed to the Attorney General’s Office, if the MCP has been delinquent in submitting payment) after they have demonstrated improved performance in accordance with this appendix. If an MCP does not comply within two years of the date of notification of noncompliance, then the monies will not be refunded.
5.c. Combined Remedies
If ODJFS determines that one systemic problem is responsible for multiple deficiencies, ODJFS may impose a combined remedy which will address all areas of deficient performance. The total fines assessed in any one month will not exceed 15.0% of the MCP’s monthly capitation.
5.d. Enrollment Freezes
MCPs found to have a pattern of repeated or ongoing noncompliance may be subject to an enrollment freeze.
5.e. Reconsideration
Requests for reconsideration of monetary sanctions and enrollment freezes may be submitted as provided in Appendix N, Compliance Assessment System.
5.f. Contract Termination, Nonrenewals or Denials
Upon termination, nonrenewal or denial of an MCP contract, all monetary sanctions collected under this appendix will be retained by ODJFS. The at-risk amount paid to the MCP under the current provider agreement will be returned to ODJFS in accordance with Appendix P, Terminations, of the provider agreement.
Appendix N
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
APPENDIX N
COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM
CFC ELIGIBLE POPULATION
I. General Provisions of the Compliance Assessment System
A. The Compliance Assessment System (CAS) is designed to improve the quality of each managed care plan’s (MCP’s) performance through actions taken by the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services (ODJFS) to address identified failures to meet program requirements. This appendix applies to the MCP specified in the baseline of this MCP Provider Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the Agreement).
B. The CAS assesses progressive remedies with specified values (e.g., points, fines, etc.) assigned for certain documented failures to satisfy the deliverables required by Ohio Administrative Code (OAC) rule or the Agreement. Remedies are progressive based upon the severity of the violation, or a repeated pattern of violations. The CAS allows the accumulated point total to reflect patterns of less serious violations as well as less frequent, more serious violations.
C. The CAS focuses on clearly identifiable deliverables and sanctions/remedial actions are only assessed in documented and verified instances of noncompliance. The CAS does not include categories which require subjective assessments or which are not within the MCPs control.
D. The CAS does not replace ODJFS’ ability to require corrective action plans (CAPs) and program improvements, or to impose any of the sanctions specified in OAC rule 5101:3-26-10, including the proposed termination, amendment, or nonrenewal of the MCP’s Provider Agreement.
E. As stipulated in OAC rule 5101:3-26-10(F), regardless of whether ODJFS imposes a sanction, MCPs are required to initiate corrective action for any MCP program violations or deficiencies as soon as they are identified by the MCP or ODJFS.
F. In addition to the remedies imposed in Appendix N, remedies related to areas of financial performance, data quality, and performance management may also be imposed pursuant to Appendices J, L, and M respectively, of the Agreement.
G. If ODJFS determines that an MCP has violated any of the requirements of sections 1903(m) or 1932 of the Social Security Act which are not specifically identified within the CAS, ODJFS may, pursuant to the provisions of OAC rule 5101:3-26-10(A), notify the MCP’s members that they may terminate from the MCP without cause and/or suspend any further new member selections.
Appendix N
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
H. For purposes of the CAS, the date that ODJFS first becomes aware of an MCP’s program violation is considered the date on which the violation occurred. Therefore, program violations that technically reflect noncompliance from the previous compliance term will be subject to remedial action under CAS at the time that ODJFS first becomes aware of this noncompliance.
I. In cases where an MCP contracted healthcare provider is found to have violated a program requirement (e.g., failing to provide adequate contract termination notice, marketing to potential members, inappropriate member billing, etc.), ODJFS will not assess points if: (1) the MCP can document that they provided sufficient notification/education to providers of applicable program requirements and prohibited activities; and (2) the MCP takes immediate and appropriate action to correct the problem and to ensure that it does not happen again to the satisfaction of ODJFS. Repeated incidents will be reviewed to determine if the MCP has a systemic problem in this area, and if so, sanctions/remedial actions may be assessed, as determined by ODJFS.
J. All notices of noncompliance will be issued in writing via email and facsimile to the identified MCP contact.
II. Types of Sanctions/Remedial Actions
ODJFS may impose the following types of sanctions/remedial actions, including, but not limited to, the items listed below. The following are examples of program violations and their related penalties. This list is not all inclusive. As with any instance of noncompliance, ODJFS retains the right to use their sole discretion to determine the most appropriate penalty based on the severity of the offense, pattern of repeated noncompliance, and number of consumers affected. Additionally, if an MCP has received any previous written correspondence regarding their duties and obligations under OAC rule or the Agreement, such notice may be taken into consideration when determining penalties and/or remedial actions.
A. Corrective Action Plans (CAPs) – A CAP is a structured activity/process implemented by the MCP to improve identified operational deficiencies.
MCPs may be required to develop CAPs for any instance of noncompliance, and CAPs are not limited to actions taken in this Appendix. All CAPs requiring ongoing activity on the part of an MCP to ensure their compliance with a program requirement remain in effect for twenty-four months.
In situations where ODJFS has already determined the specific action which must be implemented by the MCP or if the MCP has failed to submit a CAP, ODJFS may require the MCP to comply with an ODJFS-developed or “directed” CAP.
In situations where a penalty is assessed for a violation an MCP has previously been assessed a CAP (or any penalty or any other related written correspondence), the MCP may be assessed escalating penalties.
Appendix N
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
B. Quality Improvement Directives (QIDs) – A QID is a general instruction that directs the MCP to implement a quality improvement initiative to improve identified administrative or clinical deficiencies. All QIDs remain in effect for twelve months from the date of implementation.
MCPs may be required to develop QIDs for any instance of noncompliance.
In situations where ODJFS has already determined the specific action which must be implemented by the MCP or if the MCP has failed to submit a QID, ODJFS may require the MCP to comply with an ODJFS-developed or “directed” QID.
In situations where a penalty is assessed for a violation an MCP has previously been assessed a QID (or any penalty or any other related written correspondence), the MCP may be assessed escalating penalties.
C. Points - Points will accumulate over a rolling 12-month schedule. Each month, points that are more than 12-months old will expire. Points will be tracked and monitored separately for each Agreement the MCP concomitantly holds with the BMHC, beginning with the commencement of this Agreement (i.e., the MCP will have zero points at the onset of this Agreement).
No points will be assigned for any violation where an MCP is able to document that the precipitating circumstances were completely beyond their control and could not have been foreseen (e.g., a construction crew severs a phone line, a lightning strike blows a computer system, etc.).
C.1.5 Points -- Failures to meet program requirements, including but not limited to, actions which could impair the member’s ability to obtain correct information regarding services or which could impair a consumer’s or member’s rights, as determined by ODJFS, will result in the assessment of 5 points. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
| • | Violations which result in a member’s MCP selection or termination based on inaccurate provider panel information from the MCP. |
| • | Failure to provide member materials to new members in a timely manner. |
| • | Failure to comply with appeal, grievance, or state hearing requirements, including the failure to notify a member of their right to a state hearing when the MCP proposes to deny, reduce, suspend or terminate a Medicaid-covered service. |
| • | Failure to staff 24-hour call-in system with appropriate trained medical personnel. |
| • | Failure to meet the monthly call-center requirements for either the member services or the 24-hour call-in system lines. |
| • | Provision of false, inaccurate or materially misleading information to health care providers, the MCP’s members, or any eligible individuals. |
| • | Use of unapproved marketing or member materials. |
| • | Failure to appropriately notify ODJFS or members of provider panel terminations. |
| • | Failure to update website provider directories as required. |
Appendix N
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
C.2. 10 Points -- Failures to meet program requirements, including but not limited to, actions which could affect the ability of the MCP to deliver or the consumer to access covered services, as determined by ODJFS. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
| • | Discrimination among members on the basis of their health status or need for health care services (this includes any practice that would reasonably be expected to encourage termination or discourage selection by individuals whose medical condition indicates probable need for substantial future medical services). |
| • | Failure to assist a member in accessing needed services in a timely manner after request from the member. |
| • | Failure to provide medically-necessary Medicaid covered services to members. |
| • | Failure to process prior authorization requests within the prescribed time frames. |
D. Fines – Refundable or nonrefundable fines may be assessed as a penalty separate to or in combination with other sanctions/remedial actions.
D.1. Unless otherwise stated, all fines are nonrefundable.
D.2. Pursuant to procedures as established by ODJFS, refundable and nonrefundable monetary sanctions/assurances must be remitted to ODJFS within thirty (30) days of receipt of the invoice by the MCP. In addition, per Ohio Revised Code Section 131.02, payments not received within forty-five (45) days will be certified to the Attorney General’s (AG’s) office. MCP payments certified to the AG’s office will be assessed the appropriate collection fee by the AG’s office.
D.3. Monetary sanctions/assurances imposed by ODJFS will be based on the most recent premium payments.
D.4. Any monies collected through the imposition of a refundable fine will be returned to the MCP (minus any applicable collection fees owed to the Attorney General’s Office if the MCP has been delinquent in submitting payment) after they have demonstrated full compliance, as determined by ODJFS, with the particular program requirement. If an MCP does not comply within one (1) year of the date of notification of noncompliance involving issues of case management and two (2) years of the date of notification of noncompliance in issues involving encounter data, then the monies will not be refunded.
D.5. MCPs are required to submit a written request for refund to ODJFS at the time they believe is appropriate before a refund of monies will be considered.
Appendix N
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
E. Combined Remedies - - Notwithstanding any other action ODJFS may take under this Appendix, ODJFS may impose a combined remedy which will address all areas of noncompliance if ODJFS determines, in its sole discretion, that (1) one systemic problem is responsible for multiple areas of noncompliance and/or (2) that there are a number of repeated instances of noncompliance with the same program requirement.
F. Progressive Remedies - Progressive remedies will be based on the number of points accumulated at the time of the most recent incident. Unless specifically otherwise indicated in this appendix, all fines are nonrefundable. The designated fine amount will be assessed when the number of accumulated points falls within the ranges specified below:
| 0 -15 Points | Corrective Action Plan (CAP) |
| 16-25 Points | CAP + $5,000 fine |
| 26-50 Points | CAP + $10,000 fine |
| 51-70 Points | CAP + $20,000 fine |
| 71-100 Points | CAP + $30,000 fine |
| 100+ Points | Proposed Contract Termination |
G. New Member Selection Freezes - Notwithstanding any other penalty or point assessment that ODJFS may impose on the MCP under this Appendix, ODJFS may prohibit an MCP from receiving new membership through consumer initiated selection or the assignment process if: (1) the MCP has accumulated a total of 51 or more points during a rolling 12-month period; (2) or the MCP fails to fully implement a CAP within the designated time frame; or (3) circumstances exist which potentially jeopardize the MCP’s members’ access to care. [Examples of circumstances that ODJFS may consider as jeopardizing member access to care include:
| - | the MCP has been found by ODJFS to be noncompliant with the prompt payment or the non-contracting provider payment requirements; |
| - | the MCP has been found by ODJFS to be noncompliant with the provider panel requirements specified in Appendix H of the Agreement; |
| - | the MCP’s refusal to comply with a program requirement after ODJFS has directed the MCP to comply with the specific program requirement; or |
| - | the MCP has received notice of proposed or implemented adverse action by the Ohio Department of Insurance.] |
Appendix N
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
Payments provided for under the Agreement will be denied for new enrollees, when and for so long as, payments for those enrollees are denied by CMS in accordance with the requirements in 42 CFR 438.730.
H. Reduction of Assignments – ODJFS has sole discretion over how member auto-assignments are made. ODJFS may reduce the number of assignments an MCP receives to assure program stability within a region or if ODJFS determines that the MCP lacks sufficient capacity to meet the needs of the increased volume in membership. Examples of circumstances which ODJFS may determine demonstrate a lack of sufficient capacity include, but are not limited to an MCP’s failure to: maintain an adequate provider network; repeatedly provide new member materials by the member’s effective date; meet the minimum call center requirements; meet the minimum performance standards for identifying and assessing children with special health care needs and members needing case management services; and/or provide complete and accurate appeal/grievance, member’s PCP and CAMS data files.
I. Termination, Amendment, or Nonrenewal of MCP Provider Agreement - ODJFS can at any time move to terminate, amend or deny renewal of a provider agreement. Upon such
termination, nonrenewal, or denial of an MCP provider agreement, all previously collected monetary sanctions will be retained by ODJFS.
J. Specific Pre-Determined Penalties
I.1. Adequate network-minimum provider panel requirements - Compliance with provider panel requirements will be assessed quarterly. Any deficiencies in the MCP’s provider network as specified in Appendix H of the Agreement or by ODJFS, will result in the assessment of a $1,000 nonrefundable fine for each category (practitioners, PCP capacity, hospitals), for each county, and for each population (e.g., ABD, CFC). For example if the MCP did not meet the following minimum panel requirements, the MCP would be assessed (1) a $3,000 nonrefundable fine for the failure to meet CFC panel requirements; and, (2) a $1,000 nonrefundable fine for the failure to meet ABD panel requirements).
| · | practitioner requirements in Franklin county for the CFC population |
| · | practitioner requirements in Franklin county for the ABD population |
| · | hospital requirements in Franklin county for the CFC population |
| · | PCP capacity requirements in Fairfield county for the CFC population |
In addition to the pre-determined penalties, ODJFS may assess additional penalties pursuant to this Appendix (e.g. CAPs, points, fines) if member specific access issues are identified resulting from provider panel noncompliance.
Appendix N
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
J.2. Geographic Information System - Compliance with the Geographic Information System (GIS) requirements will be assessed semi-annually. Any failure to meet GIS requirements as specified in Appendix H of the Agreement will result a $1,000 nonrefundable fine for each county and for each population (e.g., ABD, CFC, etc.). For example if the MCP did not meet GIS requirements in the following counties, the MCP would be assessed (1) a nonrefundable $2,000 fine for the failure to meet GIS requirements for the CFC population and (2) a $1,000 nonrefundable fine for the failure to meet GIS requirements for the ABD population.
| · | GIS requirements in Franklin county for the CFC population |
| · | GIS requirements in Fairfield county for the CFC population |
| · | GIS requirements in Franklin county for the ABD population |
J.3. Late Submissions - - All required submissions/data and documentation requests must be received by their specified deadline and must represent the MCP in an honest and forthright manner. Failure to provide ODJFS with a required submission or any data/documentation requested by ODJFS will result in the assessment of a nonrefundable fine of $100 per day, unless the MCP requests and is granted an extension by ODJFS. Assessments for late submissions will be done monthly. Examples of such program violations include, but are not limited to:
| · | Late required submissions |
| o | Annual delegation assessments |
| o | Franchise fee documentation |
| o | Reinsurance information (e.g., prior approval of changes) |
| o | State hearing notifications |
| · | Late required data submissions |
| o | Appeals and grievances, case management, or PCP data |
| · | Late required information requests |
| o | Automatic call distribution reports |
| o | Information/resolution regarding consumer or provider complaint |
| o | Just cause or other coordination care request from ODJFS |
| o | Provider panel documentation |
| o | Failure to provide ODJFS with a required submission after ODJFS has notified the MCP that the prescribed deadline for that submission has passed |
Appendix N
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
If an MCP determines that they will be unable to meet a program deadline or data/documentation submission deadline, the MCP must submit a written request to its Contract Administrator for an extension of the deadline, as soon as possible, but no later than 3 PM EST on the date of the deadline in question. Extension requests should only be submitted in situations where unforeseeable circumstances have occurred which make it impossible for the MCP to meet an ODJFS-stipulated deadline and all such requests will be evaluated upon this standard. Only written approval as may be granted by ODJFS of a deadline extension will preclude the assessment of compliance action for untimely submissions.
J.4. Noncompliance with Claims Adjudication Requirements - If ODJFS finds that an MCP is unable to (1) electronically accept and adjudicate claims to final status and/or (2) notify providers of the status of their submitted claims, as stipulated in Appendix C of the Agreement, ODJFS will assess the MCP with a monetary sanction of $20,000 per day for the period of noncompliance.
If ODJFS has identified specific instances where an MCP has failed to take the necessary steps to comply with the requirements specified in Appendix C of the Agreement for (1) failing to notify non-contracting providers of procedures for claims submissions when requested and/or (2) failing to notify contracting and non-contracting providers of the status of their submitted claims, the MCP will be assessed 5 points per incident of noncompliance.
J.5. Noncompliance with Prompt Payment: - Noncompliance with the prompt pay requirements as specified in Appendix J of the Agreement will result in progressive penalties. The first violation during a rolling 12-month period will result in the submission of quarterly prompt pay and monthly status reports to ODJFS until the next quarterly report is due. The second violation during a rolling 12-month period will result in the submission of monthly status reports
and a refundable fine equal to 5% of the MCP’s monthly premium payment or $300,000, whichever is less. The refundable fine will be applied in lieu of a nonrefundable fine and the money will be refunded by ODJFS only after the MCP complies with the required standards for two (2) consecutive quarters. Subsequent violations will result in an enrollment freeze.
If an MCP is found to have not been in compliance with the prompt pay requirements for any time period for which a report and signed attestation have been submitted representing the MCP as being in compliance, the MCP will be subject to an enrollment freeze of not less than three (3) months duration.
Appendix N
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
J.6. Noncompliance with Franchise Fee Assessment Requirements - In accordance with ORC Section 5111.176, and in addition to the imposition of any other penalty, occurrence or points under this Appendix, an MCP that does not pay the franchise permit fee in full by the due date is subject to any or all of the following:
| · | A monetary penalty in the amount of $500 for each day any part of the fee remains unpaid, except the penalty will not exceed an amount equal to 5 % of the total fee that was due for the calendar quarter for which the penalty was imposed; |
| · | Withholdings from future ODJFS capitation payments. If an MCP fails to pay the full amount of its franchise fee when due, or the full amount of the imposed penalty, ODJFS may withhold an amount equal to the remaining amount due from any future ODJFS capitation payments. ODJFS will return all withheld capitation payments when the franchise fee amount has been paid in full; |
| · | Proposed termination or non-renewal of the MCP’s Medicaid provider agreement may occur if the MCP: |
| a. | Fails to pay its franchise permit fee or fails to pay the fee promptly; |
| b. | Fails to pay a penalty imposed under this Appendix or fails to pay the penalty promptly; |
| c. | Fails to cooperate with an audit conducted in accordance with ORC Section 5111.176. |
J.7. Noncompliance with Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments - Noncompliance with CLIA requirements as specified by ODJFS will result in the assessment of a nonrefundable $1,000 fine for each violation.
J.8. Noncompliance with Abortion and Sterilization Payment - Noncompliance with abortion and sterilization requirements as specified by ODJFS will result in the assessment of a nonrefundable $2,000 fine for each documented violation. Additionally, MCPs must take all appropriate action to correct each ODJFS-documented violation.
J.9. Refusal to Comply with Program Requirements - If ODJFS has instructed an MCP that they must comply with a specific program requirement and the MCP refuses, such refusal constitutes documentation that the MCP is no longer operating in the best interests of the MCP’s members or the state of Ohio and ODJFS will move to terminate or nonrenew the MCP’s provider agreement.
Appendix N
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
III. Request for Reconsiderations
MCPs may request a reconsideration of remedial action taken under the CAS for penalties that include points, fines, reductions in assignments and/or selection freezes. Requests for reconsideration must be submitted on the ODJFS required form as follows:
A. MCPs notified of ODJFS’ imposition of remedial action taken under the CAS will have ten (10) working days from the date of receipt of the facsimile to request reconsideration, although ODJFS will impose enrollment freezes based on an access to care concern concurrent with initiating notification to the MCP. Any information that the MCP would like reviewed as part of the reconsideration request must be submitted at the time of submission of the reconsideration request, unless ODJFS extends the time frame in writing.
B. All requests for reconsideration must be submitted by either facsimile transmission or overnight mail to the Chief, Bureau of Managed Health Care, and received by ODJFS by the tenth business day after receipt of the faxed notification of the imposition of the remedial action by ODJFS.
C. The MCP will be responsible for verifying timely receipt of all reconsideration requests. All requests for reconsideration must explain in detail why the specified remedial action should not be imposed. The MCP’s justification for reconsideration will be limited to a review of the written material submitted by the MCP. The Bureau Chief will review all correspondence and materials related to the violation in question in making the final reconsideration decision.
D. Final decisions or requests for additional information will be made by ODJFS within ten (10) business days of receipt of the request for reconsideration.
E. If additional information is requested by ODJFS, a final reconsideration decision will be made within three (3) business days of the due date for the submission. Should ODJFS require additional time in rendering the final reconsideration decision, the MCP will be notified of such in writing.
F. If a reconsideration request is decided, in whole or in part, in favor of the MCP, both the penalty and the points associated with the incident, will be rescinded or reduced, in the sole discretion of ODJFS. The MCP may still be required to submit a CAP if ODJFS, in its sole discretion, believes that a CAP is still warranted under the circumstances.
Appendix O
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
APPENDIX O
PAY-FOR PERFORMANCE (P4P)
CFC ELIGIBLE POPULATION
This Appendix establishes P4P for managed care plans (MCPs) to improve performance in specific areas important to the Medicaid MCP members. P4P include the at-risk amount included with the monthly premium payments (see Appendix F, Rate Chart), and possible additional monetary rewards up to $250,000.
To qualify for consideration of any P4P, MCPs must meet minimum performance standards established in Appendix M, Performance Evaluation on selected measures, and achieve P4P standards established for selected Clinical Performance Measures. For qualifying MCPs, higher performance standards for three measures must be reached to be awarded a portion of the at-risk amount and any additional P4P (see Sections 1 and 2). An excellent and superior standard is set in this Appendix for each of the three measures. Qualifying MCPs will be awarded a portion of the at-risk amount for each excellent standard met. If an MCP meets all three excellent and superior standards, they may be awarded additional P4P (see Section 3).
Prior to the transition to a regional-based statewide P4P system (SFY 2006 through SFY 2009), the county-based statewide P4P system (sections 1 and 2 of this Appendix) will apply to MCPs with membership as of February 1, 2006. Only counties with membership as of February 1, 2006 will be used to calculate performance levels for the county-based statewide P4P system.
1. SFY 2008 P4P
1.a. Qualifying Performance Levels
To qualify for consideration of the SFY 2008 P4P, an MCP’s performance level must meet the minimum performance standards set in Appendix M, Performance Evaluation, for the measures listed below. A detailed description of the methodologies for each measure can be found on the BMHC page of the ODJFS website.
Measures for which the minimum performance standard for SFY 2008 established in Appendix M, Performance Evaluation, must be met to qualify for consideration of P4P are as follows:
1. PCP Turnover (Appendix M, Section 2.a.)
Report Period: CY 2007
2. Children’s Access to Primary Care (Appendix M, Section 2.b.)
Report Period: CY 2007
3. Adults’ Access to Preventive/Ambulatory Health Services (Appendix M, Section 2.c.)
Report Period: CY 2007
Appendix O
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
4. Overall Satisfaction with MCP (Appendix M, Section 3.)
Report Period: The most recent consumer satisfaction survey completed prior to the end of SFY 2008.
For each clinical performance measure listed below, the MCP must meet the P4P standard to be considered for SFY 2008 P4P. The MCP meets the P4P standard if one of two criteria are met. The P4P standard is a performance level of either:
1) The minimum performance standard established in Appendix M, Performance Evaluation, for seven of the nine clinical performance measures listed below; or
2) The Medicaid benchmarks for seven of the nine clinical performance measures listed below. The Medicaid benchmarks are subject to change based on the revision or update of applicable national standards, methods or benchmarks.
Clinical Performance Measure | Medicaid Benchmark |
1. Perinatal Care - Frequency of Ongoing Prenatal Care | 42% |
2. Perinatal Care - Initiation of Prenatal Care | 71% |
3. Perinatal Care - Postpartum Care | 48% |
4. Well-Child Visits – Children who turn 15 months old | 34% |
5. Well-Child Visits - 3, 4, 5, or 6, years old 6. Well-Child Visits - 12 through 21 years old 7. Use of Appropriate Medications for People with Asthma 8. Annual Dental Visits 9. Blood Lead – 1 year olds | 50% 30% 83% 40% 45% |
1.b. Excellent and Superior Performance Levels
For qualifying MCPs as determined by Section 1.a., performance will be evaluated on the measures below to determine the status of the at-risk amount or any additional P4P that may be awarded. Excellent and Superior standards are set for the three measures described below. The standards are subject to change based on the revision or update of applicable national standards, methods or benchmarks.
A brief description of these measures is provided in Appendix M, Performance Evaluation. A detailed description of the methodologies for each measure can be found on the BMHC page of the ODJFS website.
Appendix O
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
1. Case Management of Children (Appendix M, Section 1.b.i.)
Report Period: April - June 2008
Excellent Standard: 5.5%
Superior Standard: 6.5%
2. Use of Appropriate Medications for People with Asthma (Appendix M, Section 1.c.v.)
Report Period: CY 2007
Excellent Standard: 86%
Superior Standard: 88%
3. Adults’ Access to Preventive/Ambulatory Health Services (Appendix M, Section 2.c.)
Report Period: CY 2007
Excellent Standard: 76%
Superior Standard: 84%
1.c. Determining SFY 2008 P4P
MCP’s reaching the minimum performance standards described in Section 1.a. herein, will be considered for P4P including retention of the at-risk amount and any additional P4P. For each Excellent standard established in Section 1.b. herein, that an MCP meets, one-third of the at-risk amount may be retained. For MCPs meeting all of the Excellent and Superior standards established in Section 1.b. herein, additional P4P may be awarded. For MCPs receiving additional P4P, the amount in the P4P fund (see Section 3.) will be divided equally, up to the maximum additional amount, among all MCPs’ ABD and/or CFC programs receiving additional P4P. The maximum additional amount to be awarded per plan, per program, per contract year is $250,000. An MCP may receive up to $500,000 should both of the MCP’s ABD and CFC programs achieve the Superior Performance Levels.
Appendix O
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
2. SFY 2009 P4P
2.a. Qualifying Performance Levels
To qualify for consideration of the SFY 2009 P4P, an MCP’s performance level must meet the minimum performance standards set in Appendix M, Performance Evaluation, for the measures listed below. A detailed description of the methodologies for each measure can be found on the BMHC page of the ODJFS website.
Measures for which the minimum performance standard for SFY 2009 established in Appendix M, Performance Evaluation, must be met to qualify for consideration of P4P are as follows:
1. PCP Turnover (Appendix M, Section 2.a.)
Report Period: CY 2008
2. Children’s Access to Primary Care (Appendix M, Section 2.b.)
Report Period: CY 2008
3. Adults’ Access to Preventive/Ambulatory Health Services (Appendix M, Section 2.c.)
Report Period: CY 2008
4. Overall Satisfaction with MCP (Appendix M, Section 3.)
Report Period: The most recent consumer satisfaction survey completed prior to the end of SFY 2009.
For each clinical performance measure listed below, the MCP must meet the P4P standard to be considered for SFY 2009 P4P. The MCP meets the P4P standard if one of two criteria is met. The P4P standard is a performance level of either:
1) The minimum performance standard established in Appendix M, Performance Evaluation, for seven of the nine clinical performance measures listed below; or
2) The Medicaid benchmarks for seven of the nine clinical performance measures listed below. The Medicaid benchmarks are subject to change based on the revision or update of applicable national standards, methods or benchmarks.
Appendix O
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
Clinical Performance Measure | Medicaid Benchmark | |
1. Perinatal Care - Frequency of Ongoing Prenatal Care | 44% | |
2. Perinatal Care - Initiation of Prenatal Care | 74% | |
3. Perinatal Care - Postpartum Care | 50% | |
4. Well-Child Visits – Children who turn 15 months old | 42% | |
5. Well-Child Visits - 3, 4, 5, or 6, years old 6. Well-Child Visits - 12 through 21 years old 7. Use of Appropriate Medications for People with Asthma 8. Annual Dental Visits 9. Blood Lead – 1 year olds | 57% 33% 84% 42% 45% | |
2.b. Excellent and Superior Performance Levels
For qualifying MCPs as determined by Section 2.a., performance will be evaluated on the measures below to determine the status of the at-risk amount or any additional P4P that may be awarded. Excellent and Superior standards are set for the three measures described below. The standards are subject to change based on the revision or update of applicable national standards, methods or benchmarks.
A brief description of these measures is provided in Appendix M, Performance Evaluation. A detailed description of the methodologies for each measure can be found on the BMHC page of the ODJFS website.
1. Case Management of Children (Appendix M, Section 1.b.i.)
Report Period: April - June 2009
Excellent Standard: To be determined.
Superior Standard: To be determined.
2. Use of Appropriate Medications for People with Asthma (Appendix M, Section 1.c.v.)
Report Period: CY 2008
Excellent Standard: To be determined.
Superior Standard: To be determined.
3. Adults’ Access to Preventive/Ambulatory Health Services (Appendix M, Section 2.c.)
Report Period: CY 2008
Excellent Standard: 77%
Superior Standard: 84%
Appendix O
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
2.c. Determining SFY 2008 P4P
MCP’s reaching the minimum performance standards described in Section 2.a. herein, will be considered for P4P including retention of the at-risk amount and any additional P4P. For each Excellent standard established in Section 2.b. herein, that an MCP meets, one-third of the at-risk amount may be retained. For MCPs meeting all of the Excellent and Superior standards established in Section 2.b. herein, additional P4P may be awarded. For MCPs receiving additional P4P, the amount in the P4P fund (see Section 3.) will be divided equally, up to the maximum additional amount, among all MCPs’ ABD and/or CFC programs receiving additional P4P. The maximum additional amount to be awarded per plan, per program, per contract year is $250,000. An MCP may receive up to $500,000 should both of the MCP’s ABD and CFC programs achieve the Superior Performance Levels.
3. NOTES
3.a. Transition from a county-based statewide to a regional-based statewide P4P system.
The current county-based statewide P4P system will transition to a regional-based statewide system as managed care expands statewide. The regional-based statewide approach will be fully phased in no later than SFY 2010. The regional-based statewide P4P system will be modeled after the county-based statewide system with adjustments to performance standards where appropriate.
3.a.i. County-based statewide P4P system
For MCPs in their first twenty-four months of Ohio Medicaid CFC Managed Care Program participation, the status of the at-risk amount will not be determined because compliance with many of the standards cannot be determined in an MCP’s first two contract years (see Appendix F., Rate Chart). In addition, MCPs in their first two contract years are not eligible for the additional P4P amount awarded for superior performance.
Starting with the twenty-fifth month of participation in the program, a new MCP’s at-risk amount will be included in the P4P system. The determination of the status of this at-risk amount will be after at least three full calendar years of membership as many of the performance standards require three full calendar years to determine an MCP’s performance level. Because of this requirement, more than 12 months of at-risk dollars may be included in an MCP’s first at-risk status determination depending on when an MCP starts with the program relative to the calendar year.
During the transition to a regional-based statewide system (SFY 2006 through SFY 2009), MCPs with membership as of February 1, 2006 will continue in the county-based statewide P4P system until the transition is complete. These MCPs will be put at-risk for a portion of the premiums received for members in counties they are serving as of February 1, 2006.
Appendix O
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
3.a.ii. Regional-based statewide P4P system
All MCPs will be included in the regional-based statewide P4P system. The at-risk amount will be determined separately for each region an MCP serves.
The status of the at-risk amount for counties not included in the county-based statewide P4P system will not be determined for the first twenty-four months of regional membership. Starting with the twenty-fifth month of regional membership, the MCP’s at-risk amount will be included in the P4P system. The determination of the status of this at-risk amount will be after at least three full calendar years of regional membership as many of the performance standards require three full calendar years to determine an MCP’s performance level. Given that statewide expansion was not complete by December 31, 2006, ODJFS may adjust performance measure reporting periods based on the number of months an MCP has had regional membership. Because of this requirement, more than 12 months of at-risk dollars may be included in an MCP’s first regional at-risk status determination depending on when regional membership starts relative to the calendar year. Regional premium payments for months prior to July 2009 for members in counties included in the county-based statewide P4P system for the SFY 2009 P4P determination, will be excluded from the at-risk dollars included in the first regional-based statewide P4P determination.
3.b. Determination of at-risk amounts and additional P4P payments
Given that unforeseen circumstances (e.g., revision or update of applicable national standards, methods or benchmarks, or issues related to program implementation) may impact the determination of the status of an MCP’s at-risk amount and any additional P4P payments, ODJFS reserves the right to calculate an MCP’s at-risk amount (the status of which is determined in accordance with this appendix) using a lesser percentage than that established in Appendix F (Regional Rates) and to award additional P4P in an amount lesser than that established in this appendix.
For MCPs that have participated in the Ohio Medicaid Managed Care Program long enough to calculate performance levels for all of the performance measures included in the P4P system, determination of the status of an MCP’s at-risk amount will occur within six months of the end
of the contract period. Determination of additional P4P payments will be made at the same time the status of an MCP’s at-risk amount is determined.
3.c. Contract Termination, Nonrenewals, or Denials
Upon termination, nonrenewal or denial of an MCP contract, the at-risk amount paid to the MCP under the current provider agreement will be returned to ODJFS in accordance with Appendix P., Terminations/Nonrenewals/Amendments, of the provider agreement.
Additionally, in accordance with Article XI of the provider agreement, the return of the at-risk amount paid to the MCP under the current provider agreement will be a condition necessary for ODJFS’ approval of a provider agreement assignment.
3.d. Report Periods
The report period used in determining the MCP’s performance levels varies for each measure depending on the frequency of the report and the data source. Unless otherwise noted, the most recent report or study finalized prior to the end of the contract period will be used in determining the MCP’s overall performance level for that contract period.
Appendix P
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
APPENDIX P
MCP TERMINATIONS/NONRENEWALS/AMENDMENTS
ABD ELIGIBLE POPULATION
Upon termination either by the MCP or ODJFS, nonrenewal or denial of an MCP’s provider agreement, all previously collected refundable monetary sanctions will be retained by ODJFS.
1 .. MCP-INITIATED TERMINATIONS/NONRENEWALS
If an MCP provides notice of the termination/nonrenewal of their provider agreement to ODJFS, pursuant to Article VIII of the agreement, the MCP will be required to submit the following to ODJFS:
a. | Refundable Monetary Assurance and the At-Risk Amount |
The MCP will be required to submit a refundable monetary assurance. This monetary assurance will be held by ODJFS until such time that the MCP has submitted all outstanding monies owed, data files, and reports, including, but not limited to, grievance, appeal, encounter and cost report data related to time periods through the final date of service under the MCP’s provider agreement. The monetary assurance must be in an amount of either $50,000 or 5 % of the capitation amount paid by ODJFS in the month the termination/nonrenewal notice is issued, whichever is greater.
The MCP must also return to ODJFS the at-risk amount paid to the MCP under the current provider agreement. The amount to be returned will be based on actual MCP membership for preceding months and estimated MCP membership through the end date of the contract. MCP membership for each month between the month the termination/nonrenewal is issued and the end date of the provider agreement will be estimated as the MCP membership for the month the termination/nonrenewal is issued. Any over payment will be determined by comparing actual to estimated MCP membership and will be returned to the MCP following the end date of the provider agreement.
The MCP must remit the monetary assurance and the at-risk amount in the specified amounts via separate electronic fund transfers (EFT) payable to Treasurer of State, State of Ohio(ODJFS). The MCP should contact their Contract Administrator to verify the correct amounts required for the monetary assurance and the at-risk amount and obtain an invoice number prior to submitting the monetary assurance and the at-risk amount. Information from the invoices must be included with each EFT to ensure monies are deposited in the appropriate ODJFS Fund account. In addition, the MCP must send copies of the EFT bank confirmations and copies of the invoices to their Contract Administrator.
If the monetary assurance and the at-risk amount are not received as specified above, ODJFS will withhold the MCP’s next month’s capitation payment until such time that ODJFS receives documentation that the monetary assurance and the at-risk amount are received by the Treasurer of State. If within one year of the date of issuance of the invoice, an MCP does not submit all outstanding monies owed and required submissions, including, but not limited to, grievance, appeal, encounter and cost report data related to time periods through the final date of service under the MCP’s provider agreement, the monetary assurance will not be refunded to the MCP.
Appendix P
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
b. Data Files
In order to assist members with continuity of care, the MCP must create data files to be shared with each newly enrolling MCP. The data files will be provided in
a consistant format specified by ODJFS and may include information on the following: case management, prior authorizations, inpatient facility stays, PCP
assignments, and pregnant members. The timeline for providing these files will be at the discretion of ODJFS. The terminating MCP will be responsible for ensuring
the accuracy and data quality of the files.
The MCP must notify contracted providers at least 55 days prior to the effective date of termination. The provider notification must be approved by ODJFS prior to distribution.
ii. Member Notification
The MCP must notify their members of the termination at least 45 days in advance of the effective date of termination. The member notification must be approved by ODJFS prior to distribution.
iii. Prior Authorization Re-Direction Notification
The MCP must create two notices to assist members and providers with prior authorization requests received and/or approved during the last month of membership. The first notice is for prior authorization requests for services to be provided after the effective date of termination; this notice will direct members and providers to contact the enrolling MCP. The second notice is for prior authorization requests for services to be provided before and after the effective date of termination. The MCP must utilize ODJFS model language to create the notices and receive approval by ODJFS prior to distribution. The notices will be mailed to the provider and copied to the member for all requests received during the last month of MCP membership.
2. ODJFS-INITIATED TERMINATIONS
If ODJFS initiates the proposed termination, nonrenewal or amendment of an MCP’s provider
agreement pursuant to OAC rule 5101:3-26-10 and the MCP appeals that proposed action, the MCP’s provider agreement will be extended through the issuance of an adjudication order in the MCP’s appeal under the R.C. Chapter 119.
Appendix P
Covered Families and Children (CFC) population
During this time, the MCP will continue to accrue points and be assessed penalties for each
subsequent compliance assessment occurrence/violation under Appendix N of the provider agreement. If the MCP exceeds 69 points, each subsequent point accrual will result in a $15,000 nonrefundable fine.
Pursuant to OAC rule 5101:3-26-10(H), if ODJFS has proposed the termination, nonrenewal, denial or amendment of a provider agreement, ODJFS may notify the MCP's members of this proposed action and inform the members of their right to immediately terminate their membership with that MCP without cause. If ODJFS has proposed the termination, nonrenewal, denial or amendment of a provider agreement and access to medically-necessary covered services is jeopardized, ODJFS may propose to terminate the membership of all of the MCP's members. The appeal process for reconsideration of the proposed termination of members is as follows:
· | All notifications of such a proposed MCP membership termination will be made by ODJFS via certified or overnight mail to the identified MCP Contact. |
· | MCPs notified by ODJFS of such a proposed MCP membership termination will have three working days from the date of receipt to request reconsideration. |
· | All reconsideration requests must be submitted by either facsimile transmission or overnight mail to the Deputy Director, Office of Ohio Health Plans, and received by 3PM Eastern Time (ET) on the third working day following receipt of the ODJFS notification of termination. The address and fax number to be used in making these requests will be specified in the ODJFS notification of termination document. |
· | The MCP will be responsible for verifying timely receipt of all reconsideration requests. All requests must explain in detail why the proposed MCP membership termination is not justified. The MCP’s justification for reconsideration will be limited to a review of the written material submitted by the MCP. |
· | A final decision or request for additional information will be made by the Deputy Director within three working days of receipt of the request for reconsideration. Should the Deputy Director require additional time in rendering the final reconsideration decision, the MCP will be notified of such in writing. |
· | The proposed MCP membership termination will not occur while an appeal is under review and pending the Deputy Director’s decision. If the Deputy Director denies the appeal, the MCP membership termination will proceed at the first possible effective date. The date may be retroactive if the ODJFS determines that it would be in the best interest of the members. |