Notes to Financial Statements | |
| 6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2009
USD / shares
|
Notes to Financial Statements [Abstract] | |
NOTE 1-Basis of Presentation |
NOTE 1Basis of Presentation
Regions Financial Corporation (Regions or the Company) provides a full range of banking and bank-related services to individual and corporate customers through its subsidiaries and branch offices located primarily in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Virginia. The Company is subject to competition from other financial institutions, is subject to the regulations of certain government agencies and undergoes periodic examinations by those regulatory authorities.
The accounting and reporting policies of Regions and the methods of applying those policies that materially affect the consolidated financial statements conform with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) and with general financial services industry practices. The accompanying interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions for Form 10-Q and, therefore, do not include all information and notes to the consolidated financial statements necessary for a complete presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with GAAP. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of only normal and recurring items, necessary for the fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements have been included. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in Regions Form 10-K for the year ended December31, 2008.
Certain amounts in prior period financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications are immaterial and have no effect on net income, total assets or stockholders equity. |
NOTE 2-Earnings (Loss) per Common Share |
NOTE 2Earnings (Loss) per Common Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic earnings (loss) per common share and diluted earnings (loss) per common share:
ThreeMonthsEnded June30 SixMonthsEnded June30
(In millions, except per share amounts) 2009 2008 2009 2008
Numerator:
Net income (loss) $ (188 ) $ 206 $ (111 ) $ 543
Preferred stock dividends (56 ) (107 )
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders $ (244 ) $ 206 $ (218 ) $ 543
Denominator:
Weighted-average common shares outstandingbasic 876 696 785 696
Common stock equivalents
Weighted-average common shares outstandingdiluted 876 696 785 696
Earnings (loss) per common share:
Basic $ (0.28 ) $ 0.30 $ (0.28 ) $ 0.78
Diluted (0.28 ) 0.30 (0.28 ) 0.78
The effect from the assumed exercise of 55.4million stock options for both the quarter and six months ended June30, 2009 and 54.2million stock options for both the quarter and six months ended June30, 2008, was not included in the above computations of diluted earnings per common share because such amounts would have had an antidilutive effect on earnings per common share. The effect from the assumed issuance of 71million common shares upon conversion of mandatorily convertible preferred stock in May 2009 was not included in the above computations of diluted earnings per common share because such amounts would have had an antidilutive effect on earnings per common share (see Note 3 for further discussion). |
NOTE 3-Stockholders' Equity and Comprehensive Income |
NOTE 3Stockholders' Equity and Comprehensive Income
On November14, 2008, Regions completed the sale of 3.5million shares of its Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A, par value $1.00 and liquidation preference $1,000.00 per share (and $3.5 billion liquidation preference in the aggregate) to the U.S. Treasury as part of the Capital Purchase Program (CPP). Regions will pay the U.S. Treasury on a quarterly basis a 5% dividend, or $175 million annually, for each of the first five years of the investment, and 9% thereafter unless Regions redeems the shares. Regions performed a discounted cash flow analysis to value the preferred stock at the date of issuance. For purposes of this analysis, Regions assumed that the preferred stock would most likely be redeemed five years from the valuation date based on optimal financial budgeting considerations. Regions used the Bloomberg USD US Bank BBB index to derive the market yield curve as of the valuation date to discount future expected cash flows to the valuation date. The discount rate used to value the preferred stock was 7.46%, based on this yield curve at a 5-year maturity. Dividends were assumed to be accrued until redemption. While the discounting was required based on a 5-year redemption, Regions did not have a 5-year security or similarly termed security available. As a result, it was necessary to use a benchmark yield curve to calculate the 5-year value. To determine the appropriate yield curve that was applicable to Regions, the yield to maturity on the outstanding debt instrument with the longest dated maturity (Perpetual Preferred 8.875%June15, 2078, Series issued by Regions Financing Trust III) was compared to the longest point on the USD US Bank BBB index as of November14, 2008. Regions concluded that the yield to maturity as of the valuation date of the debt, which was 11.03%, was consistent with the indicative yield of the curve noted above. The longest available point on this curve was 10.55% at 30 years.
As part of its purchase of the preferred securities, the U.S. Treasury also received a warrant to purchase 48.3million shares of Regions common stock at an exercise price of $10.88 per share, subject to anti-dilution and other adjustments. The warrant expires ten years from the issuance date. Regions used the Cox-Ross-Rubinstein Binomial Option Pricing Model (CRR Model) to value the warrant at the date of issuance. The CRR Model is a standard option pricing model which incorporates optimal early exercise in order to receive the benefit of future dividend payments. Based on the transferability of the warrant, the CRR Model approach that was applied assumes that the warrant holder will not sub-optimally exercise its warrant. The following assumptions were used in the CRR Model:
Stock price(a) $ 9.67
Exercise price(b) $ 10.88
Expected volatility(c) 45.22 %
Risk-free rate(d) 4.25 %
Dividend yield(e) 3.88 %
Warrant term (in years)(b) 10
(a)
Closing stock price of Regions as of the valuation date (November 14, 2008).
(b)
Per the Warrant to Purchase Agreement, dated November14, 2008. |
NOTE 4-Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits |
NOTE 4Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
Net periodic pension and other postretirement benefits cost included the following components as follows:
ForTheThreeMonthsEnded June 30
Pension OtherPostretirement Benefits
(In millions) 2009 2008 2009 2008
Service cost $ 1 $ 10 $ $
Interest cost 21 22 1
Expected return on plan assets (22 ) (29 )
Amortization of prior service cost (credit) 1 1 (1 )
Amortization of actuarial loss 11
Curtailment gains (4 )
$ 12 $ $ $
For The Six Months Ended June 30
Pension Other Postretirement Benefits
(In millions) 2009 2008 2009 2008
Service cost $ 2 $ 20 $ $
Interest cost 43 44 1 1
Expected return on plan assets (44 ) (59 )
Amortization of prior service cost (credit) 1 2 (1 )
Amortization of actuarial loss 22
Settlement charge
Curtailment gains (4 )
$ 24 $ 3 $ $ 1
The curtailment gains recognized during the second quarter of 2008 resulted from merger-related employment terminations.
Beginning in March 2009, participant accruals of service in the Regions Financial Corporation Retirement Plan were temporarily suspended resulting in a reduction in service cost. Matching contributions in the 401(k) plans were temporarily suspended beginning in the second quarter of 2009. |
NOTE 5-Share-Based Payments |
NOTE 5Share-Based Payments
Regions has long-term incentive compensation plans that permit the granting of incentive awards in the form of stock options, restricted stock awards and units, and stock appreciation rights. The terms of all awards issued under these plans are determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, but no options may be granted after the tenth anniversary of the plans adoption. Options and restricted stock usually vest based on employee service, generally within three years from the date of the grant. The contractual life of options granted under these plans ranges from seven to ten years from the date of grant. The number of remaining share equivalents authorized for future issuance under long-term compensation plans was approximately 6.4million share equivalents at June30, 2009.
In 2009, Regions made a stock option grant that vests based upon a service condition and a market condition in addition to awards that were similar to prior grants. The fair value of these stock options was estimated on the date of the grant using a Monte-Carlo simulation method. The simulation generates a defined number of stock price paths in order to develop a reasonable estimate of the range of future expected stock prices and minimize standard error. For all other grants that vest solely upon a service condition, the fair value of stock options is estimated at the date of the grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model and related assumptions.
The following table summarizes the weighted-average assumptions used and the estimated fair values related to stock options granted during the six months ended June30:
June30
2009 2008
Expected dividend yield 1.85 % 6.94 %
Expected volatility 67.15 % 26.40 %
Risk-free interest rate 2.80 % 2.90 %
Expected option life 6.8 yrs. 5.8 yrs.
Fair value $ 1.78 $ 2.47
During 2009, expected volatility increased based upon increases in the historical volatility of Regions stock price and the implied volatility measurements from traded options on the Companys stock. The expected option life increased due to changes in the employee grant base and employee exercise behavior. The expected dividend yield decreased based upon the markets expectation of reduced dividends in the near term.
The following table details the activity during the first six months of 2009 and 2008 related to stock options:
For the Six Months EndedJune30
2009 2008
Number of Options Wtd.Avg. Exercise Price Number of Options Wtd.Avg. Exercise Price
Outstanding at beginning of period 52,955,298 $ 28.22 48,044,207 $ 29.71
Granted 4,063,209 3.29 9,672,751 21.87
Exercised (90,801 ) 17.94
Forfeited or cancelled (1,594,451 ) 30.37 (3,025,808 ) 29.77
Outstanding at end of period 55,424,056 $ 26.31 54,600,349 $ 28.34
Exercisable at end of period 44,376,343 $ 28.79 42,363,726 $ 29.34
In 200 |
NOTE 6-Securities |
NOTE 6Securities
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and estimated fair value of securities available for sale and securities held to maturity are as follows:
June30, 2009 Cost Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized Losses Estimated Fair Value
Non-creditOTTI Other
(In millions)
Securities available for sale:
U.S. Treasury securities $ 46 $ 5 $ $ $ 51
Federal agency securities 42 2 44
Obligations of states and political subdivisions 509 7 (2 ) 514
Mortgage-backed securities
Residential 16,845 395 (191 ) (95 ) 16,954
Commercial 897 1 (55 ) 843
Other debt securities 23 (3 ) 20
Equity securities 1,253 2 1,255
$ 19,615 $ 412 $ (191 ) $ (155 ) $ 19,681
Securities held to maturity:
U.S. Treasury securities $ 13 $ 2 $ $ $ 15
Federal agency securities 8 8
Mortgage-backed securities 20 (1 ) 19
Other debt securities 2 2
$ 43 $ 2 $ $ (1 ) $ 44
December31, 2008 Cost Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized Losses Estimated Fair Value
(In millions)
Securities available for sale:
U.S. Treasury securities $ 802 $ 84 $ $ 886
Federal agency securities 1,521 175 1,696
Obligations of states and political subdivisions 755 9 (8 ) 756
Mortgage-backed securities 14,585 283 (539 ) 14,329
Other debt securities 21 (2 ) 19
Equity securities 1,178 1 (15 ) 1,164
$ 18,862 $ 552 $ (564 ) $ 18,850
Securities held to maturity:
U.S. Treasury securities $ 14 $ 1 $ $ 15
Federal agency securities 10 (1 ) 9
Obligations of states and political subdivisions 1 1
Mortgage-backed securities 20 20
Other debt securities 2 2
$ 47 $ 1 $ (1 ) $ 47
Regions evaluates securities in a loss position for other-than-temporary impairment, considering such factors as the length of time and the extent to which the market value has been below cost, the credit standing of the issuer, and Regions ability and intent to hold the security until its market value recovers. Activity related to the credit loss component of other-than-temporary impairment is recognized in earnings. For debt securities the portion of other-than-temporary impairment related to all other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income. |
NOTE 7-Business Segment Information |
NOTE 7Business Segment Information
Regions segment information is presented based on Regions key segments of business. Each segment is a strategic business unit that serves specific needs of Regions customers. The Companys primary segment is General Banking/Treasury, which represents the Companys branch network, including consumer and commercial banking functions, and has separate management that is responsible for the operation of that business unit. This segment also includes the Companys Treasury function, including the Companys securities portfolio and other wholesale funding activities. Prior to year-end 2008, Regions had reported an Other segment that included merger charges and the parent company. Regions realigned to include the parent company with General Banking/Treasury as parent company transactions essentially support the Treasury function. The 2008 amounts presented below have been adjusted to conform to the 2009 presentation.
In addition to General Banking/Treasury, Regions has designated as distinct reportable segments the activity of its Investment Banking/Brokerage/Trust and Insurance divisions. Investment Banking/Brokerage/Trust includes trust activities and all brokerage and investment activities associated with Morgan Keegan. Insurance includes all business associated with commercial insurance and credit life products sold to consumer customers.
The reportable segment designated Merger Charges includes merger charges related to the AmSouth acquisition for the periods presented. These amounts are excluded from other reportable segments because management reviews the results of the other reportable segments excluding these items.
The following tables present financial information for each reportable segment for the period indicated.
(In millions) General Banking/ Treasury Investment Banking/ Brokerage/ Trust Insurance Merger Charges Total Company
Three months ended June30, 2009
Net interest income $ 816 $ 14 $ 1 $ $ 831
Provision for loan losses 912 912
Non-interest income 854 318 27 1,199
Non-interest expense 926 285 20 1,231
Income tax expense 55 17 3 75
Net income (loss) $ (223 ) $ 30 $ 5 $ $ (188 )
Average assets $ 140,783 $ 4,817 $ 487 $ $ 146,087
(In millions) General Banking/ Treasury Investment Banking/ Brokerage/ Trust Insurance Merger Charges Total Company
Three months ended June30, 2008
Net interest income $ 956 $ 22 $ 1 $ $ 979
Provision for loan losses 309 309
Non-interest income 409 307 28 744
Non-interest expense 750 268 23 100 1,141
Income tax expense (benefit) 80 23 2 (38 ) 67
Net income (loss) $ 226 $ 38 $ 4 $ (62 ) $ 206
Average |
NOTE 8-Goodwill |
NOTE 8Goodwill
Goodwill allocated to each reportable segment as of June30, 2009,December, 31, 2008, and June30, 2008 is presented as follows:
(In millions) June30 2009 December31 2008 June30 2008
General Banking/Treasury $ 4,691 $ 4,691 $ 10,669
Investment Banking/Brokerage/Trust 745 740 732
Insurance 120 117 114
Balance at end of period $ 5,556 $ 5,548 $ 11,515
The Companys goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis, or more often if events or circumstances indicate that there may be impairment. Adverse changes in the economic environment, declining operations, or other factors could result in a decline in the implied fair value of goodwill. A goodwill impairment test includes two steps. Step One, used to identify potential impairment, compares the estimated fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the estimated fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not to be impaired. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. Step Two of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied estimated fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. In order to determine the implied estimated fair value, a full purchase price allocation is required to be performed in the same manner as if a business combination had occurred as outlined in Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No.141(R), Business Combinations (FAS 141(R)). If the carrying amount of goodwill for that reporting unit exceeds the implied fair value of that units goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.
During the second quarter of 2009, Regions assessed the indicators of goodwill impairment as of June15, 2009, and through the date of the filing of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June30, 2009. The indicators we assessed included:
Recent operating performance,
Changes in market capitalization,
Regulatory actions and assessments,
Changes in the business climate (including legal factors and competition),
Company specific factors (including changes in key personnel, asset impairments, and business dispositions), and
Trends in the banking industry.
Based on the assessment of the indicators above, quantitative testing of goodwill was performed for the June30, 2009 interim period.
For purposes of performing Step One of the goodwill impairment test, Regions uses both the income and market approaches to value its reporting units. The income approach consists of discounting projected long-term future cash flows, which are derived from internal forecasts and economic expectations for the respective reporting units. The projected future cash flows are discounted using cost of capital metrics for Regions peer group or a build-up approach (such as |
NOTE 9-Loan Servicing |
NOTE 9Loan Servicing
Effective January1, 2009, the Company made an election allowed by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets, an Amendment of FASB Statement No.140 (FAS 156) to prospectively change the policy for accounting for residential mortgage servicing rights from the amortization method to the fair value measurement method. Under the fair value measurement method, servicing assets are measured at fair value each period with changes in fair value recorded as a component of mortgage banking income.
The fair value of mortgage servicing rights is calculated using various assumptions including future cash flows, market discount rates, expected prepayment rates, servicing costs and other factors. A significant change in prepayments of mortgages in the servicing portfolio could result in significant changes in the valuation adjustments, thus creating potential volatility in the carrying amount of mortgage servicing rights. Regions uses various derivative instruments to mitigate the income statement effect of changes in the fair value of its mortgage servicing rights. During the three months ended June30, 2009 and the first six months of 2009, Regions recognized a net $1.8 million loss and a net $2.8 million loss, respectively, associated with changes in mortgage servicing rights and the aforementioned derivatives, which is included in mortgage income.
The tables below present analyses of mortgage servicing rights:
(In millions) ThreeMonthsEnded June 30, 2009 SixMonthsEnded June 30, 2009
Carrying value, beginning of period $ 161 $ 161
Additions 33 52
Increase (decrease) in fair value:
Due to change in valuation inputs or assumptions 18 9
Other changes(1) (10 ) (20 )
Carrying value, end of period $ 202 $ 202
(1)
Represents economic amortization associated with borrower repayments.
Data and assumptions used in the fair value calculation related to residential mortgage servicing rights (excluding related derivative instruments) as of June30, 2009 are as follows (dollars in millions):
Unpaid principal balance $ 22,984
Weighted-average prepayment speed (CPR) 27.29
Estimated impact on fair value of a 10% increase $ (9 )
Estimated impact on fair value of a 20% increase $ (18 )
Weighted-average discount rate 10.60 %
Estimated impact on fair value of a 10% increase $ (5 )
Estimated impact on fair value of a 20% increase $ (10 )
Weighted-average coupon interest rate 5.91 %
Weighted-average remaining maturity (months) 282
Weighted-average servicing fee (basis points) 28.8
The sensitivity calculations above are hypothetical and should not be considered to be predictive of future performance. Changes in fair value based on adverse changes in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, the effect of an adverse variation in a partic |
NOTE 10-Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities |
NOTE 10Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities
Regions enters into derivative financial instruments to manage interest rate risk, facilitate asset/liability management strategies and manage other exposures. These derivative instruments primarily include interest rate swaps, options on interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and floors, Eurodollar futures, forward rate contracts and forward sale commitments. All derivative financial instruments are recognized on the consolidated balance sheets as other assets or other liabilities at fair value as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities as amended (FAS 133). Regions enters into master netting agreements with counterparties and/or requires collateral based on counterparty credit ratings to cover exposures.
Interest rate swaps are agreements to exchange interest payments based upon notional amounts. Interest rate swaps subject Regions to market risk associated with changes in interest rates, as well as the credit risk that the counterparty will fail to perform. Option contracts involve rights to buy or sell financial instruments on a specified date or over a period at a specified price. These rights do not have to be exercised. Some option contracts such as interest rate floors, involve the exchange of cash based on changes in specified indices. Interest rate floors are contracts to hedge interest rate declines based on a notional amount. Interest rate floors subject Regions to market risk associated with changes in interest rates, as well as the credit risk that the counterparty will fail to perform. Forward rate contracts are commitments to buy or sell financial instruments at a future date at a specified price or yield. Regions primarily enters into forward rate contracts on market instruments, which expose Regions to market risk associated with changes in the value of the underlying financial instrument, as well as the credit risk that the counterparty will fail to perform. Eurodollar futures are futures contracts on Eurodollar deposits. Eurodollar futures subject Regions to market risk associated with changes in interest rates. Because futures contracts are cash settled daily, there is minimal credit risk associated with Eurodollar futures.
The following table presents the fair value of derivative instruments on a gross basis as of June30, 2009:
Asset Derivatives Liability Derivatives
(In millions) Balance Sheet Location Fair Value Balance Sheet Location Fair Value
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under FAS 133:
Interest rate swaps Otherassets $ 474 Otherliabilities $
Interest rate options Other assets 70 Other liabilities
Eurodollar futures(1) Other assets Other liabilities
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments under FAS 133 $ 544 $
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under FAS 133 :
Interest rate swaps Other assets $ 1,696 Other liabilities $ 1,605
Interest rate |
NOTE 11-Fair Value Measurements |
NOTE 11Fair Value Measurements
Regions adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.157, Fair Value Measurements (FAS 157), as of January1, 2008. FAS 157 establishes a framework for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities and defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) as opposed to the price that would be paid to acquire the asset or received to assume the liability (an entry price). Under FAS 157, a fair value measure should reflect the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including the assumptions about the risk inherent in a particular valuation technique, the effect of a restriction on the sale or use of an asset and the risk of nonperformance. FAS 157 requires disclosures that stratify balance sheet amounts measured at fair value based on inputs the Company uses to derive fair value measurements. These strata include:
Level 1 valuations, where the valuation is based on quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities traded in active markets (which include exchanges and over-the-counter markets with sufficient volume),
Level 2 valuations, where the valuation is based on quoted market prices for similar instruments traded in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market, and
Level 3 valuations, where the valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use significant assumptions not observable in the market, but observable based on Company-specific data. These unobservable assumptions reflect the Companys own estimates for assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques typically include option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques, but may also include the use of market prices of assets or liabilities that are not directly comparable to the subject asset or liability.
ITEMS MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE ON A RECURRING BASIS
Trading account assets (net of certain short-term borrowings), securities available for sale, mortgage loans held for sale, mortgage servicing rights, and derivatives are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis.
The following tables present financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June30, 2009 and 2008, respectively:
June30, 2009 Level1 Level 2 Level3 Fair Value
(In millions)
Trading account assets, net $ 229 $ 429 $ 133 $ 791
Securities available for sale 376 19,232 73 19,681
Mortgage loans held for sale 1,373 1,373
Mortgage servicing rights 202 202
Derivatives, net(1) 783 7 790
(1)
Derivatives include approximately $1.1 billion related to legally enforceable master netting agreements that allow the Company to settle positive and negative positions. Derivative assets and liabilities are a |
NOTE 12-Commitments and Contingencies |
NOTE 12Commitments and Contingencies
COMMERCIAL COMMITMENTS
Regions issues off-balance sheet financial instruments in connection with lending activities. The credit risk associated with these instruments is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers and is subject to Regions normal credit approval policies and procedures. Regions measures inherent risk associated with these instruments by recording a reserve for unfunded commitments based on an assessment of the likelihood that the guarantee will be funded and the creditworthiness of the customer or counterparty. Collateral is obtained based on managements assessment of the customer.
Credit risk associated with these instruments is represented by the contractual amounts indicated in the following table:
(In millions) June30 2009 December31 2008 June30 2008
Unused commitments to extend credit $ 33,354 $ 37,271 $ 43,195
Standby letters of credit 4,784 8,012 8,447
Commercial letters of credit 14 20 31
Unused commitments to extend creditTo accommodate the financial needs of its customers, Regions makes commitments under various terms to lend funds to consumers, businesses and other entities. These commitments include (among others) revolving credit agreements, term loan commitments and short-term borrowing agreements. Many of these loan commitments have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of these commitments are expected to expire without being funded, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future liquidity requirements. However, the current lack of liquidity in the broader market and the current credit environment has resulted in increased fundings of commitments to extend credit.
Standby letters of creditStandby letters of credit are also issued to customers, which commit Regions to make payments on behalf of customers if certain specified future events occur. Regions has recourse against the customer for any amount required to be paid to a third party under a standby letter of credit. Historically, a large percentage of standby letters of credit expired without being funded. The current lack of liquidity in the broader market and the current credit environment has resulted in increased fundings of standby letters of credit. The contractual amount of standby letters of credit represents the maximum potential amount of future payments Regions could be required to make and represents Regions maximum credit risk. At June30, 2009,December31, 2008 and June30, 2008, Regions had $106 million, $118 million and $136 million, respectively, of liabilities associated with standby letter of credit agreements, with related assets of $98 million, $108 million and $125 million, respectively.
Commercial letters of creditCommercial letters of credit are issued to facilitate foreign or domestic trade transactions for customers. As a general rule, drafts will be drawn when the goods underlying the transaction are in transit.
The reserve for all of these off-balance sheet financial instruments was $53 million, $74 mi |
NOTE 13-Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
NOTE 13Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FAS 157, which provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities, but does not expand the use of fair value in any circumstance. FAS 157 also requires expanded disclosures about the extent to which a company measures assets and liabilities at fair value, the information used to measure fair value, and the effect of fair value measurements on an entitys financial statements. This statement applies when other standards require or permit assets and liabilities to be measured at fair value. FAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. Regions adopted FAS 157 on January1, 2008, and the effect of adoption on the consolidated financial statements was not material. Additionally, in February 2008, the FASB issued FSP 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No.157 (FSP 157-2), which delays the effective date of FAS 157 for non-recurring, non-financial instruments to fiscal years beginning after November15, 2008. Regions implemented the provisions of FSP FAS 157-2 as of January1, 2009. See Note 11, Fair Value Measurements for additional information about the impact of the adoption of FAS 157 and FAS 157-2.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (FAS 141(R)). FAS 141(R) requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize all (and only) the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction; establishes the acquisition-date fair value as the measurement objective for all assets acquired and liabilities assumed; and requires the acquirer to disclose to investors and other users all of the information needed to evaluate and understand the nature and financial effect of the business combination. FAS 141(R) is effective for fiscal years beginning after December15, 2008. Regions adopted FAS 141(R) as of January1, 2009, and the adoption did not have a material impact on Regions consolidated financial statements. However, the adoption of FAS 141(R) could have a material impact to the consolidated financial statements for prospective business combinations.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements (FAS 160), which requires all entities to report noncontrolling (minority) interests in subsidiaries as equity in the consolidated financial statements. Additionally, FAS 160 requires that transactions between an entity and noncontrolling interests be treated as equity transactions. FAS 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December15, 2008. Regions adopted FAS 160 on January1, 2009, and the adoption did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (FAS 161). FAS 161 requires entities to provide enha |
NOTE 14-Subsequent Events |
NOTE 14Subsequent Events
Regions has evaluated all subsequent events for potential recognition and disclosure through August5, 2009, the date of the filing of this Form 10-Q. |