Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2014 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |
Basis of Accounting, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Basis of Presentation |
|
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, AMZG, Inc., EERG Energy ULC (“EERG” - Canadian) and AEE Canada Inc. (“AEE Canada” - Canadian). All material intercompany accounts, transactions and profits have been eliminated. |
|
As discussed in Note 4, the Company sold 100% of its net revenue and working interests in its Canadian oil and gas properties in July 2014. The Company legally dissolved its Canadian subsidiaries (EERG and AEE Canada) in October 2014, at which time, all remaining assets held by the Canadian entities were transferred back to the parent company. The accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2014 include the operating results and activities of EERG and AEE Canada through the date of dissolution. |
|
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year balances to conform to the current year’s presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on net income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. |
| | |
Revenue Recognition, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Revenue Recognition |
|
Revenue from the sale of produced oil and gas is recognized when the terms of the sale have been finalized and the oil or gas has been delivered to the purchaser. The Company accrues estimated oil and gas sales for production periods that have not yet been settled in cash. |
| | |
Concentration Risk, Credit Risk, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Concentration of Credit Risk |
|
At any point throughout the year, the Company may have amounts on deposit that exceed the United States Federal Deposit Insurance Company insurance limit of $250,000 per bank. |
| | |
Foreign Currency Transactions and Translations Policy [Policy Text Block] | Foreign Currency Adjustments |
|
The functional currency of EERG and AEE Canada is the Canadian Dollar. EERG’s and AEE Canada’s asset and liability account balances are translated into US Dollars at the exchange rate in effect as of the balance sheet dates. Gains and losses realized upon the settlement of foreign currency transactions are included in the Company’s results of operations. Foreign currency translation adjustments are presented as other comprehensive income. |
| | |
Comprehensive Income, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Components of Other Comprehensive Income |
|
Comprehensive income consists of net income and other gains and losses affecting stockholders’ equity that, under generally accepted accounting principles, are excluded from net income. For the Company, such items consist of unrealized gains (losses) on marketable securities and foreign currency translation adjustments. |
| | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
Cash equivalents consist of time deposits and liquid debt investments with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase. |
| | |
Receivables, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Receivables |
|
Receivables are stated at the amount the Company expects to collect. In certain instances, the Company has the legal right to offset undistributed revenues from its operated wells against uncollected receivables from its working interest partners. The Company considers the following factors when evaluating the collectability of specific receivable balances: credit-worthiness of the debtor, past transaction history with the debtor, current economic industry trends, and changes in debtor payment terms. If the financial condition of the Company’s debtors were to deteriorate, adversely affecting their ability to make payments, additional allowances would be required. |
|
The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments. Changes to the allowance for doubtful accounts made as a result of management’s determination regarding the ultimate collectability of such accounts are recognized as a charge to the Company’s earnings. Specific receivable balances that remain outstanding after the Company has used reasonable collection efforts are written off through a charge to the valuation allowance and a credit to the receivable. |
|
At December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company has determined that all receivable balances are fully collectible and, accordingly, no allowance for doubtful accounts has been recorded. |
| | |
Equipment And Leasehold Improvements [Policy Text Block] | Equipment and Leasehold Improvements |
|
Equipment and leasehold improvements are recorded at cost. Expenditures for major additions and improvements are capitalized and depreciated or amortized over the estimated useful lives of the related assets using the straight-line method for financial reporting purposes. The estimated useful lives for significant property and equipment categories are as follows: |
|
Furniture and equipment | | 3 years |
Leasehold improvements | | lesser of useful life or lease term |
|
When equipment and improvements are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and the related accumulated depreciation are removed from the Company’s accounts and any resulting gain or loss is included in the results of operations for the respective period. |
|
Expenditures for minor replacements, maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. |
| | |
Oil and Gas Properties Policy [Policy Text Block] | Oil and Gas Properties and Prospects |
|
The Company follows the full-cost method of accounting for its investments in oil and gas properties. Under the full-cost method, all costs associated with the acquisition, exploration or development of properties, are capitalized into appropriate cost centers within the full-cost pool. Internal costs that are capitalized are limited to those costs that can be directly identified with acquisition, exploration, and development activities undertaken and do not include any costs related to production, general corporate overhead, or similar activities. Cost centers are established on a country-by-country basis. |
|
Capitalized costs for each of the Company’s cost centers are amortized on the unit-of-production basis using proved oil and gas reserves. The cost of investments in unproved properties are excluded from capitalized costs to be amortized until it is determined whether or not proved reserves can be assigned to the properties. Until such a determination is made, the properties are assessed annually to ascertain whether impairment has occurred. The costs of drilling exploratory uneconomic holes are included in the amortization base immediately upon determination that the well is uneconomic. |
|
Proceeds received from the disposal of oil and gas properties are credited against accumulated costs, except when the sale represents a significant disposal of reserves, in which case a gain or loss is recognized. |
|
During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company determined that it was unlikely that it would pursue the development of its oil and gas properties that are not subject to amortization in the foreseeable future. As a result, the Company reclassified all of the capitalized costs associated with these properties into the full cost pool. |
|
As of the end of each reporting period, the capitalized costs of each cost center are subject to a ceiling test, in which the costs may not exceed the cost center ceiling. The cost center ceiling is equal to (i) the present value of estimated future net revenues, computed by applying the unweighted arithmetic average of prices posted on the first day of each of the preceding twelve months (with consideration of price changes only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to estimated future production of proved oil and gas reserves as of the date of the latest balance sheet presented, less estimated future expenditures (based on current costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved reserves computed using a discount factor of ten percent and assuming continuation of existing economic conditions; plus (ii) the cost of properties not being amortized; plus (iii) the lower of cost or estimated fair value of unproven properties included in the costs being amortized; less (iv) income tax effects related to differences between the book and tax basis of the properties. If unamortized costs capitalized within a cost center, less related deferred income taxes, exceed the cost center ceiling, the excess is charged to expense and separately disclosed during the period in which the excess occurs. The Company recognized impairment losses totaling approximately $81.9 million associated with its US cost center for the year ended December 31, 2014, and losses totaling approximately $1.7 million and approximately $10.6 million associated with its Canadian cost center for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. |
| | |
Deferred Charges, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Deferred Loan Costs |
|
The Company capitalizes costs that are directly related to securing bank loans and other types of long-term financing and amortizes such costs over the life of the corresponding debt using the effective interest method. |
| | |
Derivatives, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Derivatives |
|
Historically, the Company has entered into a number of oil price swap agreements, which represent derivative financial instruments. The Company reports its derivatives at their fair market value as of the end of each reporting period. Changes in the fair value of derivatives are included in the Company’s results of operations in the period in which they occur. The Company has no open derivative positions as of December 31, 2014. |
| | |
Asset Retirement Obligations, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Asset Retirement Obligations |
|
The Company records estimated asset retirement obligations related to the future plugging and abandoning of its existing wells in the period in which the wells are completed. The initial recording of an asset retirement obligation results in an increase in the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset and the creation of a liability. The portion of the asset retirement obligation expected to be realized during the next 12-month period is classified as a current liability, while the portion of the asset retirement obligation expected to be realized during subsequent periods is discounted and recorded at its net present value. The discount factors used to determine the net present value of the Company’s asset retirement obligation range from 4.2% to 11.0%, which represented the Company’s estimated incremental borrowing rate as of the dates that the corresponding wells were put on production. |
|
Changes in the noncurrent portion of the asset retirement obligation due to the passage of time are accreted using the interest method. The amount of change is recognized as an increase in the liability and an accretion expense in the statement of operations. Changes in either the current or noncurrent portion of the Company’s asset retirement obligation resulting from revisions to the timing or the amount of the original estimate of undiscounted cash flows are recognized as an increase or a decrease to the carrying amount of the liability and the related long-lived asset. |
| | |
Share-based Compensation, Option and Incentive Plans Policy [Policy Text Block] | Stock-Based Compensation |
|
The Company measures compensation cost for all stock-based awards at fair value on the date of grant and recognizes compensation expense in its statements of operations over the service period that the awards are expected to vest. The Company has elected to recognize compensation cost for all options with graded vesting on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the entire option. The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of approximately $1.8 million, $1.2 million and $822,000 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. |
| | |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
|
Fair value is the price that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. Hierarchy Levels 1, 2 or 3 are terms for the priority of inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. Hierarchy Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Hierarchy Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are directly or indirectly observable for the asset or liability. Hierarchy Level 3 inputs are inputs that are not observable in the market. |
| | |
Earnings Per Share, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share |
|
Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net earnings available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. For periods in which the Company recognizes net income, diluted earnings per common share is computed in the same way as basic earnings per common share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would be outstanding if all potential common shares had been issued that were dilutive. For periods in which the Company recognizes losses, the calculation of diluted earnings per share is the same as the calculation of basic earnings per share. See Note 16 for the calculation of basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012. |
| | |
Income Tax, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Income Taxes |
|
The Company follows the liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax benefits and consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax balances. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted or substantially enacted tax rates expected to apply to the taxable income in the years in which those differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred income tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the date of enactment or substantive enactment. Net operating loss carry forwards and other deferred tax assets are reviewed annually for recoverability and, if necessary, are recorded net of a valuation allowance. See Note 15 for a summary of the Company’s income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012. |
| | |
Liquidity Disclosure [Policy Text Block] | Liquidity |
|
The Company finances its oil and gas exploration and development activities and corporate operations through a combination of internally generated funds, external debt financing and sales of its common stock. As of December 31, 2014, the Company had working capital deficit of approximately $13.6 million. See Note 19 for further discussion regarding the liquidity of the Company. |
| | |
Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Use of Estimates and Assumptions |
|
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and disclosure of contingent obligations in the financial statements and accompanying notes. The Company’s most significant assumptions are the estimates used in the determination of the deferred income tax asset valuation allowance and the valuation of oil and gas reserves to which the Company owns rights. The estimation process requires assumptions to be made about future events and conditions, and as such, is inherently subjective and uncertain. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates. |
| | |
New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block] | New Accounting Pronouncements |
|
In April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Update 2014-08 - Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity. The objective of the amendments in this update is to change the criteria for reporting discontinued operations and enhance convergence of the FASB's and the International Accounting Standards Board's reporting requirements for discontinued operations. The amendments in this update change the requirements for reporting discontinued operations in Subtopic 205-20. A discontinued operation may include a component of an entity or a group of components of an entity, or a business or nonprofit activity. A disposal of a component of an entity or a group of components of an entity is required to be reported in discontinued operations if the disposal represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity's operations and financial results. The amendments in this update require an entity to present, for each comparative period, the assets and liabilities of a disposal group that includes a discontinued operation separately in the asset and liability sections, respectively, of the statement of financial position. The amendments in this update also require additional disclosures about discontinued operations. Public business entities must apply the amendments in this update prospectively to both of the following: (1) All disposals (or classifications as held for sale) of components of an entity that occur within annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within those years; (2) All businesses or nonprofit activities that, on acquisition, are classified as held for sale that occur within annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted, but only for disposals (or classifications as held for sale) that have not been reported in financial statements previously issued or available for issuance. The Company does not believe the adoption of this update will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. |
|
In May 2014, the FASB issued Update 2014-09 - Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). The objective of the amendments in this update is to improve financial reporting by creating common revenue recognition guidance for accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and International Financial Reporting Standards. The guidance in this update supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and most industry-specific guidance throughout the Industry Topics of the Codification. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. An entity should disclose sufficient information, both qualitative and quantitative, to enable users of financial statements to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The amendments in this update are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early application is not permitted. The Company does not believe the adoption of this update will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. |
|
In June 2014, the FASB issued ASC Update No. 2014-12 - Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period (“ASC No. 2014-12”). The objective of the amendments in this update is to resolve the diverse accounting treatment of share-based payment awards. The amendments in this update apply to all reporting entities that grant their employees share-based payments in which the terms of the award provide that a performance target that affects vesting could be achieved after the requisite service period. The amendments require that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation cost should be recognized in either (i) the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered or (ii) if the performance target becomes probable of being achieved before the end of the requisite service period, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost should be recognized prospectively over the remaining requisite service period. The total amount of compensation cost recognized during and after the requisite service period will reflect the number of awards that are expected to vest and will be adjusted to reflect those awards that ultimately vest. The requisite service period ends when the employee can cease rendering service and still be eligible to vest in the award if the performance target is achieved. The amendments in this update are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Earlier adoption is permitted. Entities may apply the amendments in this update either (a) prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or (b) retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. The Company does not believe the adoption of this update will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. |
| | |