EXHIBIT 99.1
Contact: | | Dana Wardwell |
| | (828-454-0676) |
Blue Ridge Paper Products Inc. Reports Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year 2006 Results:
CANTON, North Carolina (Bloomberg: bluerd) — Blue Ridge Paper Products Inc. today reported a net profit of $2.2 million for the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2006. This compared to a net loss of $2.8 million for the third quarter ended September 30, 2006 and a net loss of $11.6 million for the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2005. Total net sales for the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2006 were $140.4 million compared to $145.2 million and $126.4 million in the third quarter ended September 30, 2006 and fourth quarter ended December 31, 2005.
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, the Company reported a net loss of $1.4 million. This compares to a net loss of $20.7 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005. Total net sales for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 were $570.6 million, an increase of 11.9% when compared to net sales for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 of $509.9 million. The increase in net sales reflects improved market conditions across all business segments and increased productivity at our manufacturing locations.
Commenting on the year, Richard Lozyniak, Chief Executive Officer, stated, “2006 was a turnaround year for Blue Ridge Paper Products. We saw record production and shipments and a significant improvement in operating profit. Improving market conditions, coupled with strong productivity, moderating input costs, a new competitive labor agreement and several new customers position the Company for a stronger 2007.”
2006 Key Business Highlights
· In fiscal year 2006, the uncoated paper market improved both in shipment volume and price realization when compared to fiscal year 2005. The average price for uncoated paper in fiscal year 2006 increased 11.8% when compared to fiscal year 2005. Fiscal year 2006 shipments increased to 281,386 tons, an increase of 1.8% when compared to fiscal year 2005.
· The packaging segment recorded shipments of 275,260 tons in fiscal year 2006, which increased 7.3% over shipments in fiscal year 2005. The average price for the packaging segment in fiscal year 2006 increased 3.6% when compared to fiscal year 2005.
· In fiscal year 2006, the Company incurred due diligence and legal fees totaling $2.1 million associated with a potential growth opportunity. The transaction was not consummated; therefore, these costs were expensed in the third quarter ended September 30, 2006. Payments for these costs were made in the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2006.
· The Company continued its positive productivity trend in fiscal year 2006. Annual production records were established for uncoated paper, paperboard and pulp at the Canton mill and extruder production at our Waynesville extruder facility.
· On July 7, 2006, a new labor agreement was ratified between the United Steelworkers International Union (USW) and the Company. The new contract provides for annual increases of 4%, 3% and 3% over the next three years, retroactive to May 14, 2006. In addition, the Company will increase its contribution to the bargaining unit pension plan to maintain benefits at current levels. Modifications to the employees’ healthcare plan were also made, which included eliminating the highest cost and least utilized healthcare plan and increasing employee contributions toward healthcare.
· Effective July 1, 2006, the Company implemented a gainsharing plan for the Company’s Canton and Waynesville facilities. The plan contains provisions for semi-annual payments to all eligible employees conditional upon achieving pre-determined goals. The plan will be implemented at the Company’s converting facilities in the first half of 2007.
· The Company acquired a significant premium juice customer and several new food paper packaging customers during 2006.
· Raw material and energy costs increased in fiscal year 2006 compared to fiscal year 2005 by approximately $20.2 million. This increase was primarily due to increases in the cost of wood chips, purchased fiber, polyethylene and energy.
The Company defines EBITDA as net income before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA is EBITDA adjusted for certain unusual and non-cash items. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP measures. The Company uses EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA as relevant and useful measures to compare operating results. The presentation of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA has economic substance because these measures are used by management as measures to analyze the operating performance of the Company and the ability of the business to generate cash. Additionally, management believes some investors consider EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to be useful in analyzing and assessing the Company’s ability to service debt. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA have material limitations as analytic tools compared to net income because, among other things, they do not include
depreciation or interest expense, and therefore do not reflect current or future capital expenditures or the cost of capital. Management compensates for these limitations by using EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA as only one of several comparative tools, together with GAAP measurements, to assist in the evaluation of operating performance and to measure cash flow generated by ongoing operations. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, as the Company defines these terms, may not be comparable to similarly titled performance measures presented by other companies.
The Adjusted EBITDA for the fiscal year 2006 was $35.6 million compared to Adjusted EBITDA of $17.4 million for the fiscal year 2005.
ADJUSTED EBITDA — RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP MEASURES ($000)
| | Full Year Ended | |
| | 2006 | | 2005 | |
Net (Loss) | | $ | (1,442 | ) | $ | (20,680 | ) |
| | | | | |
Income tax | | — | | — | |
Interest expense, net | | 18,207 | | 17,419 | |
Depreciation expense | | 15,034 | | 16,741 | |
Amortization expense | | 1,544 | | 1,383 | |
| | | | | |
EBITDA | | 33,343 | | 14,863 | |
| | | | | |
ESOP expense | (A) | | 1,703 | | 4,464 | |
Flood impact | (B) | | (1,537 | ) | (2,847 | ) |
Due diligence/legal fees | (C) | | 2,098 | | — | |
Severance expense | (D) | | — | | (461 | ) |
Bad debt expense | (E) | | — | | (223 | ) |
Gain on asset sales | (F) | | | | (424 | ) |
Lawsuit reserve | (G) | | — | | 2,000 | |
| | | | | |
Adjusted EBITDA | | 35,607 | | 17,372 | |
| | | | | |
Restricted stock | | 25 | | 203 | |
Working capital | | (11,635 | ) | (1,433 | ) |
Interest income — Interest paid | | (14,110 | ) | (13,591 | ) |
Post retirement benefits | | 2,233 | | 1,808 | |
Flood impact | | 1,537 | | 2,847 | |
Severance expense | | — | | 461 | |
Bad debt expense | | — | | 223 | |
Lawsuit reserve | | — | | (2,000 | ) |
Due diligence/legal fees | | (2,098 | ) | — | |
Other assets & liabilities | | 619 | | (680 | ) |
| | | | | |
Net Cash provided by (used in) Operating Activities | | $ | 12,178 | | $ | 5,210 | |
(A) ESOP expense is a non-cash labor expense the Company incurs each year in connection with the Employee Stock Ownership Plan of the Company’s parent.
(B) Flood impact from Hurricanes Frances and Ivan reflects the losses associated with property damage, repairs and maintenance plus business interruption, offset by insurance recoveries booked and funds received from the state and federal government.
(C) Reflects due diligence and legal fees associated with a potential acquisition, which was not consummated.
(D) 2005 severance expense reflects adjustments to the severance reserve related to the closure of the Fort Worth DairyPak facility and restructuring at the Canton, North Carolina facility and corporate staff.
(E) Reflects bad debt expense in 2005.
2
(F) Reflects a gain on the sale of equipment or other operating assets sold in 2005.
(G) Represents a reserve established in 2005 for a ruling in a class-action lawsuit in which the Plaintiffs were awarded damages associated with the Canton mill’s discharge into the Pigeon River. This award is being appealed.
For additional information, please refer to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.
Certain statements in this presentation constitute forward-looking statements or statements that may be deemed or construed to be forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words “forecast,” “estimate,” “project,” “intend,” “expect,” “should,” “would,” “believe” and similar expressions and all statements that are not historical facts are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements involve and are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which could cause our actual results, performance (financial or operation), or achievements to differ from the future results, performance (financial or operating), or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These factors include but are not limited to the following: changes in underlying paper and packaging prices, raw material prices and demand for our products, and the success of various cost-savings initiatives. These and other risks are more fully discussed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.
3