The Mosaic Company 8K Regulation FD Disclosure | MOS 14 Feb 06

The Mosaic Company

Fritz Corrigan

President & CEO

February 14, 2006

Goldman Sachs Tenth Annual Agricultural Forum

Overview and Outlook

Exhibit 99.1

Good Morning and thank you for inviting Mosaic to present at this conference. I am Fritz Corrigan, President and CEO of The Mosaic Company.

Safe Harbor Statement

Certain statements contained herein constitute “forward-looking statements”

as that term is defined under the Private

Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Although we believe the assumptions made in connection with the forward-looking

statements are reasonable, they do involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the

actual results, performance or achievements of The Mosaic Company, or industry results generally, to be materially different

from those contemplated or projected, forecasted, estimated or budgeted (whether express or implied) by such statements.

Factors affecting forward-looking statements may include, among others, the ability to successfully integrate the former

operations of IMC and the Cargill fertilizer businesses; the ability to fully realize the expected cost savings from the business

combination between IMC and the Cargill fertilizer businesses within expected time frames; the ability to develop and

execute comprehensive plans for asset optimization and/or rationalization; the financial resources of, and products available

to, Mosaic’s competitors; the retention of existing, and continued attraction of additional, customers and key employees;

changes in the outlook of the nitrogen, phosphate or potash markets; changes in the costs of raw materials or energy; the

effect of any conditions or restrictions imposed on or proposed with respect to Mosaic by regulators; the effect of legislative

or regulatory changes in jurisdictions where Mosaic operates; the ability of Mosaic to obtain the regulatory permits

necessary for the continued operation of its businesses in a manner consistent with current practices or anticipated

expansions; contingencies related to environmental liability under U.S. federal and state and foreign environmental laws and

regulations; adverse weather conditions affecting central Florida or the Gulf Coast of the United States, including the impact

of potential hurricanes or excess rainfall; the rating of The Mosaic Company’s and Mosaic Global Holding Inc.’s securities

and the changes that may occur in the U.S. securities markets; and the factors described in our filings with the SEC,

including our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2005.

This presentation may not be distributed, reproduced, or used without the express written consent of The Mosaic Company.

Safe Harbor Statement

Before we start today, I want to remind you that there are forward-looking statements in this presentation. The remarks made today are based on information and understandings that we believe to be accurate as of today’s date. Actual results are likely to differ from those set forth in the forward looking statements.

February 7, 2006

Business Overview

Phosphates

Potash

Nitrogen / Offshore

Financial Outlook

I’d like to start today with an overview of Mosaic and then discuss each of our business segments. I’ll also address Mosaic’s priorities for fiscal 2006 and give you an overview of our expectations for remainder of the fiscal year. Please note that our fiscal year ends on May 31^st.

Mosaic will be the global leader

in nourishing crops, delivering distinctive

value to world agriculture and to all we touch.

Mosaic is now 15 months old. We are the product of an October 2004 combination between the former Cargill Crop Nutrition and the former IMC Global Inc. We are still working hard to complete our integration, but remain very focused on reaching our vision: Mosaic will be the global leader in nourishing crops, delivering distinctive value to world agriculture and to all we touch.

No doubt, we have a lot of work ahead of us to achieve this vision.

February 7, 2006

Ag Fundamentals are Solid

Population growth plus per capita GDP growth in developing countries

Leads to more protein in diets and increasing growth in feed grain demand

Along with growth in bio-fuels, especially ethanol in U.S.

Limited arable land results in need for higher productivity / increase in yields

Equals growth in fertilizer demand

Fertilizer

Demand

Growth

Increased

Feed Grain

Consumption

Protein

in Diet

Pound of feed per

Pound of meat produced

Cattle

Hogs

Poultry

Before I review our fertilizer outlook, let me start with the economic fundamentals at work in world agriculture, which we believe show a lot of promise. We see steadily growing population in the developing countries, and these people have increasing earning power and higher standards of living. This, in turn, leads to demand for more protein in their diets, mainly through meat products. These products require more feed grains per pound of protein. This demand growth in feed grains, along with the more recent growth in bio-fuels demand – such as ethanol – will require increased farm productivity as there is only so much arable land in the world. So higher yields are necessary to meet demand growth and this requires increased fertilizer application rates per acre or per hectare.

February 7, 2006

Ag Fundamentals are Solid

7 –

40 million

Argentina

4 -

186 million

Brazil

4 -

241 million

Indonesia

2006 GDP

Growth Rates

Population

Country

7 -

1.1 billion

India

8 -

10%

1.3 billion

China

General Economic Growth Rates in Developing Countries

Source: CIA Fact book, Mosaic

As you’re well aware, Asia and Latin America is where most of this growth in population and GDP is happening. Five key growth countries are shown in this chart. GDP growth rates in these areas are expected to range from 4% to as high as 10%. Fertilizer demand growth is likely to be among the highest in the world in these countries.

February 7, 2006

Mosaic’s Sales and Operating Earnings

1224.1

1301.9

3068.4

69.8

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Phosphate

Potash

Offshore

Nitrogen

Total Net Sales -

$5.5 billion

-42.3

-31.1

414.2

232

9.3

-100

100

200

300

400

500

Phosphate

Potash

Offshore

Nitrogen

Other

Total Operating Earnings -

$582.1 million

December 2004 –

November 2005

Now let me turn to Mosaic’s net sales and operating earnings for the last twelve months ending November 30th, 2005. Mosaic’s net sales were $5.5 billion, over half of which were from the Phosphates business, about one quarter from our Potash business, and most of the remaining quarter from our Offshore business. The Potash business was the most profitable and accounted for about two-thirds of our operating earnings while Phosphates was responsible for the majority of our remaining earnings. The challenge and opportunity to increase profitability in Phosphates segment was a major reason creating of Mosaic.

February 7, 2006

Mosaic Net Sales by Country

Other

21%

Canpotex

Brazil

15%

China

United States

32%

India

12%

Canada

Argentina

December 2004 -

November 2005 Total Net Sales $5.5 Billion

As for as the markets we serve, North America represents approximately one-third of our sales, with Brazil at 15% and India and China at a combined 20% of net sales. Canpotex’s 7% represents our potash exports, which is through Canpotex, the export association for Saskatchewan potash producers.

As you can see we serve a diversified market in both the northern and southern hemispheres, which helps moderate the seasonality of our business.

February 7, 2006

Business Overview

Phosphates

Potash

Nitrogen / Offshore

Financial Outlook

Now I will discuss Mosaic’s Phosphates business along with the global market outlook.

Mosaic’s Phosphates Segment

Attractive supply/demand with seasonal challenges

Reduce costs

Minimize exposure to volatility in raw material and energy costs

Focus on marketing products with high value

Such as MAP, MicroEssentials™

and feed

Adapt Mosaic’s

Phosphate operations to

seasonal challenges in

most cost-efficient

manner

Phosphates has an attractive supply/demand balance as a decline in 2006 trade is being about offset by a recent plant closure in the United States. However, there are clearly seasonal challenges, mainly in the December through February period, which is our third quarter. Both the domestic and export markets are slow in this period and we believe that it is likely to continue in future years. So the key for Mosaic is to adapt or optimize our operations so that we can meet high demand periods, such as in the Spring, but to still be cost efficient in slower periods, such as our third quarter.

Our focus continues to be on reducing costs, including capturing synergies from the combination. A key challenge is the current high energy price environment which raises our cost of production, mainly through higher ammonia prices. One of our strategies is to promote monoammonium phosphates, or MAP, over diammonium phosphates, or DAP, as it contains less nitrogen per tonne. Farmers can turn to cheaper urea for their nitrogen requirements. We are also promoting other high value products such as our MicroEssentials™ and feed phosphate products.

February 7, 2006

Phosphate Fertilizer Capacity 2005

Other

68%

OCP

PhosAgro

Industries

Mosaic

18%

PotashCorp

Top Five Phosphate Fertilizer Players by Capacity

2005

Mosaic

OCP

PotashCorp

PhosAgro

CF Industries

MMT DAP+MAP+TSP+MES

Mosaic: The Phosphate Leader

Phosphate Fertilizer Operations

Mosaic’s Uncle Sam facility produces only phosphoric acid. Acid from this facility is barged to

Faustina where it is granulated into DAP and MAP using ammonia that is produced on-site.

Mosaic has closed permanently the smaller acid plant at Faustina

and the granulation plant at

Taft. Both plants will be dismantled in 2005/06.

Mosaic has six phosphate rock mines in Florida with capacity of about 21 million tonnes per year. Phosphate rock, of course, is the primary building block for the finished phosphate fertilizer and products that our customers and their customers – the farmer - can actually use.

Mosaic’s has five manufacturing facilities in Florida as well as one in Louisiana where we produce phosphate products such as DAP, MAP and Triple Super Phosphate, or TSP. The charts to the side show that Mosaic accounted for 18% of world phosphate capacity in 2005 and approximately 61% of the U.S. total. Mosaic is larger than the next four largest competitors combined and is truly the global phosphate leader.

February 7, 2006

World Processed Phosphate Import Demand

In 2006, world import

demand is forecast to decline

by about 6% to 7%.

China’s quest for phosphate

self-sufficiency

A pull back in India from

very high import levels

Lower TSP imports by Brazil

Processed phosphate

includes DAP, MAP and TSP

Processed Phosphate Import Demand by Region

05E

06F

MMT

Asia

Europe

Latin America

Source: Fertecon and Mosaic

Processed Phosphate Trade

05E

06F

MMT

Source: Fertecon

and Mosaic

In 2006, world-processed phosphate import demand is projected to decline by around 6% to 7% to 20 million metric tonnes. These numbers are based on our current analysis and are slightly lower than our prior communication.

Imports by Brazil declined by over 40% in 2005. We expect a modest recovery in MAP imports but lower TSP imports in 2006 by Brazil as new capacity comes onstream.

In China, phosphate imports will continue to decline and are expected to fall to just below one million tonnes in 2006 as domestic production continues to increase, displacing imports. India remains the largest wild card in 2006. Imports soared to above two million tonnes in 2005 but we are conservatively forecasting them to import 1.5 million in 2006. This will be highly dependent on domestic production levels and subsidies in India.

Phosphate Export Supply Declining

Processed Phosphate Export Supply by Region

05E

06F

MMT

USA

Africa & Mideast

FSU

Source: Fertecon and Mosaic

2006,

world

exports

are

forecast

decline

about

with

U.S.

exports declining approximately one million tonnes.

2006 U.S. Production Lower

Recent US plant closure

in December 2005 of 1.1

million tonne capacity

Mosaic reduction of 0.6

million tonnes

The U.S. phosphate industry exported 12 million tonnes of processed phosphate per year during the last half of the 1990s. These exports have dropped to around the 9 million tonne range since 2000.

World phosphate trade was about flat in 2005, but we expect it to decline by 6% to 7% in 2006. U.S. processed phosphate exports were about unchanged at 9.2 million tonnes in 2005, but are expected to decline by about 1.2 million tonnes in 2006 to just under 8 million tonnes.

However, as noted earlier, this decline in exports will be about matched by the recent closures in the United States, plus we are reducing our production levels in line with our customers’ purchasing activity, and there was 400,000 tonnes of lost production at Mississippi Phosphates, which was directly in the path of Hurricane Katrina and may just now be restarting.

February 7, 2006

DAP Prices near record highs

DAP Prices have been on the rise for the

last three years and reached $265 per tonne

fob Tampa in July, 2005

DAP Prices

fob Tampa Vessel

100

125

150

175

200

225

250

275

$ MT

Source: Fertecon

Now let’s look at recent phosphate prices. DAP prices have been on the rise for the last three years and reached $265 per tonne fob Tampa in July. Prices have remained at these strong levels due largely to strong demand from India and Pakistan and the tightening supply/demand balance in the global phosphate market, though we are facing heightened seasonal challenges. DAP prices, fob Tampa are currently around $260 per tonne.

February 7, 2006

DAP Market Margins Pressured by Raw Materials

The DAP Market Margin has recently declined

due to higher ammonia prices

DAP Margin Before Rock

Calculated from Published Spot Prices for a Central Florida Plant

100

110

120

130

140

150

$ ST

Source: Fertecon, Green Markets, Mosaic

We manage our business based on margins. This chart shows the DAP market margin, or DAP margin minus sulfur and ammonia costs. Similar to the price trend, the DAP market margin also increased over the last year and was near a 20-year high in mid 2005.

The DAP market margin, however, declined towards the end of 2005 due to climbing ammonia prices which rose to near $400 per tonne in Tampa in November. This decline in margins combined with seasonally slow demand was why we temporarily reduced phosphates production by about 600,000 tonnes. Ammonia prices have recently declined to around $360 per tonne, but this is still a very high level and the market margin will only improve slightly.

February 7, 2006

Mosaic’s preliminary estimate of

Florida land holdings total about

260,000 acres or approximately 400

square miles

Develop a strategy to maximize

value of Florida land assets

Florida Land Holdings

Over 300,000 people move to

Florida each year

Our Phosphate business covers lots of central Florida. This chart shows our Florida foot print and the green shaded areas represent Mosaic’s land holdings. We are one of the largest landowners in Florida with holdings totaling about 400 square miles. We are in the process of developing a strategy to maximize the value of our Florida land assets. In the past, we have reclaimed the land after mining it and sold it opportunistically when someone was interested. As we move forward, we plan to take a more proactive and strategic approach to capturing value from our land holdings and will have more details as we develop this strategy. So stay tuned.

February 7, 2006

Business Overview

Phosphates

Potash

Nitrogen / Offshore

Financial Outlook

Now I will turn to Mosaic’s star performer – our Potash business.

February 7, 2006

Mosaic’s Potash Segment

Great fundamentals

Superior earnings with high cash generation

Excellent platform for growth

Low cost and intelligent operator

One of the largest manufacturers in the world

World Potash Demand Growth

to Continue

in Developing Countries

The potash business has great fundamentals. But today we face normal seasonal demand swings in this business compounded by some unusual circumstances, namely the protracted contract negotiations between Canpotex and the Chinese. As a result, current sales activity is very slow, and inventories are building. In response we are reducing production at some of our mines to reduce the buildup of excessive inventory. Longer term, however, this business has superior margins and earnings and is generating a lot of cash. Our goal is to expand this business, including the capacity expansion underway at the Esterhazy mine. We have opportunities for other expansions also, but will try to match this with demand growth. Mosaic was the world’s largest potash producer in 2004 and was one of the largest in 2005. Demand growth continues in developing countries and the supply/demand balance is very encouraging through the medium term, as no new greenfield projects are currently under construction.

February 7, 2006

Export Shipments

3.50 mmt

41% of Total

North American Shipments

5.10 mmt

59% of Total

Top 5 Export Markets

China

Brazil

India

Indonesia

Malaysia

Potash -

World Scale

We operate four significant mines in Canada as well as two in the United States. About 59% of our product is shipped into the North American market where Mosaic is a significant market participant.

As many of you know, on January 29th, we had a fire in our Esterhazy mine. I had the opportunity to be on the ground with our Potash team and I can assure you that everyone from our managers to our mine workers underground did an incredible job of not only responding to the fire, but following our safety procedures and practices to the letter. They had trained repeatedly for this type of incident, and though it was unfortunate, their successful rescue of 72 mine workers proved how capable and professional this team is, even during a serious mine fire.

Mosaic exports the remaining 41% of our production mainly through Canpotex. Mosaic accounts for about 36% of Canpotex exports and they had record high exports in calendar 2005. For 2006, potash exports should remain about near current levels, although the large Chinese potash contract has yet to be completed.

February 7, 2006

Potash Price Stabilizes

Cornbelt-Saskatchewan Potash Prices

US$ ST Granular Grade

100

120

140

160

180

200

220

240

Cornbelt

Saskatchewan

Source: Green Markets

Potash prices have about doubled over the last three years due to very strong demand and the industry’s tight supply/demand balance. This followed a long period of relatively stable prices.

Demand growth was initially strong in Latin America, mainly Brazil, but the last two years the growth has been in Asia, mainly in China and India. While potash price momentum has slowed from its recent torrid pace, prices are expected to remain strong with excellent margins.

No new Greenfield potash mines are expected to come on-stream in the next 5 years, so the potash outlook remains solid.

February 7, 2006

Business Overview

Phosphates

Potash

Nitrogen / Offshore

Financial Outlook

Now let me turn to Mosaic’s Nitrogen and Offshore segments.

Mosaic’s Nitrogen Segment

Equity stake of 50% in Saskferco Products Inc., a world scale facility

Energy-efficient plant with 1.2 million tonnes nitrogen capacity

Continued to run profitably even with high-priced natural gas

Mosaic is agency marketer for Saskferco production

Saskferco’s

equity earnings were $10 million in first half of 2006

Our Nitrogen segment is our smallest and consists mainly of our equity investment in Saskferco Products, Inc. Saskferco is a great performer and yields good cash flow. We market all of Saskferco’s production through an agency relationship plus we are also a distributor of other nitrogen products in North America.

Mosaic owns 50% of Saskferco, which is one of the most energy efficient sites in North America. This plant continued to run profitably even during periods of high-priced natural gas. Mosaic’s share of equity earnings from Saskferco were $10 million for the first half of fiscal 2006.

Mosaic’s Offshore Segment

Emphasis on distribution of Mosaic’s production

Manages seasonality of global demand

Mainly Brazil and other large growth markets

Challenging short-term environment, but long-term platform growth

Reduce supply chain costs

On the ground expertise and timely market intelligence

Equity earnings of $16 million in the first half of fiscal 2006

Offshore currently distributes about

1 million tonnes of Mosaic’s production

Our Offshore business segment differentiates Mosaic from our North American competitors. We have a large global production and distribution footprint in key growth markets, particularly in Latin America and Asia. It includes approximately one million tonnes of storage capacity at two dozen facilities worldwide.

In addition, we have Single Super Phosphate and feed production in Brazil and NPK compound and bulk blending plants in China. Finally, note that we had equity earnings of $16 million in the first half of fiscal 2006 due to our equity positions in phosphate production facilities in Brazil and China.

The offshore segment helps manage the seasonality of our business plus provides on the ground expertise and timely market intelligence. While this segment has a challenging short term environment, especially in Brazil, it is one of our platforms for long term growth.

February 7, 2006

Business Overview

Phosphates

Potash

Nitrogen / Offshore

Financial Outlook

Finally let me address Mosaic’s financial outlook.

February 7, 2006

First Half Fiscal 2006 Highlights

Net sales of $2.9 billion

Net earnings of $131.1 million

Improved Phosphate segment results with net sales of $1.6 billion

and operating earnings of $149 million

Strong Potash segment with net sales $577 million and operating

earnings of $210 million

Offshore net sales of $808 million and operating loss of $14 million

Equity earnings of $27 million from Brazil, China and investment in

Saskferco

For the first half of 2006 ended November 30^th, we earned $131.1 million or $0.30 per share with net sales of $2.9 billion.

During the first half, our Phosphates business showed year-over-year improvement with earnings of $149 million, aided by a strong pricing environment in the summer and early fall. The market, however, has weakened in our third fiscal quarter.

Our Potash business continues to benefit from record high prices with earnings of $210 million. Sales volumes are currently soft but pricing levels appear to be steady.

Mosaic’s Offshore business segment had an operating loss of $14 million in the first half, mainly the result of continued poor farm economics in Brazil, which we hope will slowly improve in calendar year 2006. Finally, our investments in non-consolidated companies contributed $27 million in the first half of our fiscal 2006, up slightly compared with the same period in fiscal 2005.

February 7, 2006

Fiscal 2006 Financial Outlook

Third quarter results expected to be very weak but stronger fourth

quarter results

Phosphate fertilizer and feed sales volume of 10.5 to 10.9 million

tonnes, down 0.1 million tonnes from January announced earnings

Focus on Execution and

Cash Flow Generation

For 2006, we are focused onexecution and cash flow generation. We continue to expect a strong fourth quarter, which is seasonally Mosaic’s best quarter, and the supply and demand fundamentals over the medium term remain attractive. Based on our current assessment, however, the third quarter may be weaker than our prior communications and could even result in a modest loss in this quarter. The pronounced seasonality of our business and anticipated third quarter results are posing some liquidity challenges, which we are closely managing and which may become a significant concern if sales don’t materialize as expected this Spring.

For now our focus is on managing cash. For example, we have recently idled four of our rock mines in Florida for an entire month to reduce the excessive build-up of high-cost inventories. While this helps our cash flow, it has a negative impact on earnings as fixed costs per tonne will increase.

Based on our most recent information, we are projecting phosphate fertilizer and feed sales volumes of 10.5 to 10.9 million tonnes for fiscal 2006 which is down 100,000 tonnes compared to our prior guidance given in our January earnings call.

February 7, 2006

Fiscal 2006 Financial Outlook

Third quarter results expected to be very weak but stronger fourth

quarter results

Phosphate fertilizer and feed sales volume of 10.5 to 10.9 million

tonnes, down 0.1 million tonnes from January announced earnings

Potash sales volume reduced by 0.5 million tonnes to 7.3 to 7.6

million tonnes

Interest cost expected about $40 million per quarter including about

$12 million of amortization credit

Equity Earnings projected to range from $35 to $50 million

Focus on Execution and

Cash Flow Generation

Similarly, for Potash, we are projecting sales of 7.3 to 7.6 million tonnes for fiscal 2006, down 500,000 tonnes compared with our prior guidance. This is mainly due to lower domestic sales volume, but also slightly lower export volume as well. These revised expectations give you an indication of how slow third quarter sales have been, especially for potash, the product with our highest margins. North American dealers as well as offshore markets have delayed purchases due to high fertilizer and energy prices.

The recent fire at our Esterhazy potash mine resulted in approximately $250,000 in damages to Mosaic and about 10 days lost production.

Our interest costs are expected to average about $40 million per quarter and this includes about $12 million per quarter of an amortization credit.

Finally, equity earnings are projected to range from $35 to $50 million for Fiscal 2006.

February 7, 2006

Sensitivities

Operating

Earnings

Change

($ in millions)

EPS

Marketing

MOP Price ($/tonne)

$10

$72.2

$0.09

Potash Volume (000 tonnes)

500

$27.3

$0.03

DAP Price ($/tonne)

$10

$73.8

$0.09

Phosphate Volume (000 tonnes)

500

$13.5

$0.02

Raw Materials

Sulfur ($/lt)

$25.0

$0.03

Ammonia ($/tonne)

$10

$16.0

$0.02

Natural Gas ($/mmbtu)

$1.00

$31.4

$0.04

Note that our results can vary widely based upon external trends, as shown by this sensitivity analysis. Clearly, the most upside potential is for our Phosphates business. The one raw material that is not on this chart over which we have direct control – rock cost – is an area that is getting significant focus and attention.

High natural gas prices are a concern as it results in slightly higher costs. In our potash business, natural gas has accounted for about 17% of Mosaic’s cost structure. Thankfully these prices are moderating with a mild winter – believe it or not – and the Potash business is expected to continue to show high margins. The main impact of high natural gas on our Phosphates business is on the price of ammonia. Today, ammonia accounts for about 40% of the cost per tonne of DAP. But ammonia prices are now beginning to decline too in response to lower gas prices.

February 7, 2006

Mosaic Finance Priorities

Generate cash to pay down debt / lower interest expense

Investment grade goal

New ERP / SOX / financial controls

Grow our successful potash business

Adapt phosphate capacity to seasonal challenges in cost-

efficient manner

Be a market leader, react swiftly and exercise strong discipline

Focus on

Execution and Cash Flow

Generation

In conclusion, let me note that Mosaic has an experienced management team that is driven to deliver superior returns during the industry’s cyclical swings. Our immediate priorities are to generate cash to pay down debt with a goal towards achieving an investment grade rating.

We are in the process of improving our financial controls including becoming SOX compliant by the end of this fiscal year and also implementing a new ERP system in October.

We plan to grow our successful Potash business, including the expansion of capacity at Esterhazy.

Given the seasonal challenges in the Phosphate business, we are developing new strategies to adapt our capacity in the most cost-efficient and demand responsive manner.

Finally, we will continue to be a market leader in Potash and Phosphates by matching our supply to our customers’ purchasing activity. You should know that I believe strongly in Mosaic and our future as evidenced by my additional share purchases recently. We expect to overcome our short-term challenges and emerge as a strong and successful market leader.

Mosaic Overview

Management: Fritz Corrigan, President & CEO

Jim Thompson, Executive Vice President

Larry Stranghoener, Executive Vice President & CFO

Website: www.Mosaicco.com

Headquarters: 3033 Campus Drive, Suite E490, Plymouth, MN 55441

Trading Symbol: NYSE: MOS

Investor Relations: Doug Hoadley, 763-577-2867

Thank you for your time. I will now take questions.

February 7, 2006

Thank you

The Mosaic Company (MOS) 8-KRegulation FD Disclosure