UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 40-F
[ ] Registration statement pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or
[ x ] Annual report pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 2012
Commission File Number001-35404
EURASIAN MINERALS INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
British Columbia, Canada | 1000 | 98-102691 |
(Province or other jurisdiction of | (Primary Standard Industrial Classification | (I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization) | Code Number) | Identification Number) |
Suite 501 – 543 Granville Street
Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 1X8
Canada
(604) 688-6390
(Address and telephone number of Registrant’s principal executive offices)
DL Services, Inc.
Columbia Center
701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 6100
Seattle, Washington 98104-7043
(206) 903-8800
(Name, address (including zip code) and telephone number (including area code) of agent for service in the United States)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class: | Name of each exchange on which registered: |
Common Shares, no par value | NYSE MKT LLC |
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:None
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:None
For annual reports, indicate by check mark the information filed with this Form:
[ x ] Annual information form | [ x ] Audited annual financial statements |
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report: 72,051,872 Common Shares, no par value, as at December 31, 2012.
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
[ x ] Yes [ ] No
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).
[ x ] Yes [ ] No
EXPLANATORY NOTE
Eurasian Minerals Inc. (the “Company” or the “Registrant”) is a Canadian issuer that is permitted, under the multijurisdictional disclosure system adopted in the United States, to prepare this annual report on Form 40-F (this “Annual Report”) pursuant to Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), in accordance with Canadian disclosure requirements, which are different from those of the United States. The Company is a “foreign private issuer” as defined in Rule 3b-4 under the Exchange Act and Rule 405 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Equity securities of the Company are accordingly exempt from Sections 14(a), 14(b), 14(c), 14(f) and 16 of the Exchange Act pursuant to Rule 3a12-3 thereunder.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report, including the documents incorporated by reference herein, may contain forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements may include statements regarding perceived merit of properties, exploration results and budgets, mineral reserves and resource estimates, work programs, capital expenditures, operating costs, cash flow estimates, production estimates and similar statements relating to the economic viability of a project, timelines, strategic plans, completion of transactions, market prices for metals or other statements that are not statements of fact. These statements relate to analyses and other information that are based on forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable and assumptions of management. Statements concerning mineral resource estimates may also be deemed to constitute “forward-looking statements” to the extent that they involve estimates of the mineralization that will be encountered if the property is developed.
Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, identified by words or phrases such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “plans,” “projects,” “estimates,” “assumes,” “intends,” “strategy,” “goals,” “objectives,” “potential,” “possible” or variations thereof or stating that certain actions, events, conditions or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “should”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved, or the negative of any of these terms and similar expressions) are not statements of historical fact and may be forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements are based on a number of material assumptions, including those listed below, which could prove to be significantly incorrect:
- the Company’s ability to achieve production at any of its mineral properties;
- estimated capital costs, operating costs, production and economic returns;
- estimated metal pricing, metallurgy, mineability, marketability and operating and capital costs, together with other assumptions underlying the Company’s resource and reserve estimates;
- the Company’s expected ability to develop adequate infrastructure at a reasonable cost;
- assumptions that all necessary permits and governmental approvals will be obtained;
- assumptions made in the interpretation of drill results, the geology, grade and continuity of the Company’s mineral deposits;
- the Company’s expectations regarding demand for equipment, skilled labor and services needed for exploration and development of mineral properties; and
- the Company’s activities will not be adversely disrupted or impeded by development, operating or regulatory risks.
2
Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ from those reflected in the forward-looking statements, including, without limitation:
- uncertainty of whether there will ever be production at the Company’s mineral exploration and development properties;
- uncertainty of estimates of capital costs, operating costs, production and economic returns;
- uncertainties relating to the assumptions underlying the Company’s resource and reserve estimates, such as metal pricing, metallurgy, mineability, marketability and operating and capital costs;
- risks related to the Company’s ability to commence production and generate material revenues or obtain adequate financing for its planned exploration and development activities;
- risks related to the Company’s ability to finance the development of its mineral properties through external financing, joint ventures or other strategic alliances, the sale of property interests or otherwise;
- risks related to the third parties on which the Company depends for its exploration and development activities;
- dependence on cooperation of joint venture partners in exploration and development of properties;
- credit, liquidity, interest rate and currency risks;
- risks related to market events and general economic conditions;
- uncertainty related to inferred mineral resources;
- risks and uncertainties relating to the interpretation of drill results, the geology, grade and continuity of the Company’s mineral deposits;
- risks related to lack of adequate infrastructure;
- mining and development risks, including risks related to infrastructure, accidents, equipment breakdowns, labor disputes or other unanticipated difficulties with or interruptions in development, construction or production;
- the risk that permits and governmental approvals necessary to develop and operate mines on the Company’s properties will not be available on a timely basis or at all;
- commodity price fluctuations;
- risks related to governmental regulation and permits, including environmental regulation;
- risks related to the need for reclamation activities on the Company’s properties and uncertainty of cost estimates related thereto;
- uncertainty related to title to the Company’s mineral properties;
- uncertainty as to the outcome of potential litigation;
- risks related to increases in demand for equipment, skilled labor and services needed for exploration and development of mineral properties, and related cost increases;
- increased competition in the mining industry;
- the Company’s need to attract and retain qualified management and technical personnel;
- risks related to hedging arrangements or the lack thereof;
- uncertainty as to the Company’s ability to acquire additional commercially mineable mineral rights;
- risks related to the integration of potential new acquisitions into the Company’s existing operations;
- risks related to unknown liabilities in connection with acquisitions;
- risks related to conflicts of interest of some of the directors of the Company;
- risks related to global climate change;
- risks related to adverse publicity from non-governmental organizations;
- uncertainty as to the Company’s PFIC status;
- uncertainty as to the Company’s status as a “foreign private issuer” and “emerging growth company” in future years;
- uncertainty as to the Company’s ability to maintain the adequacy of internal control over financial reporting; and
- risks related to regulatory and legal compliance and increased costs relating thereto.
This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect any of the Company’s forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are statements about the future and are inherently uncertain, and actual achievements of the Company or other future events or conditions may differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements due to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors, including, without limitation, those referred to under the heading “Description of the Business—Risk Factors” in the AIF (as defined below), which is incorporated by reference herein.
3
The Company’s forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, expectations and opinions of management on the date the statements are made, and the Company does not assume any obligation to update forward-looking statements if circumstances or management’s beliefs, expectations or opinions should change, except as required by law. For the reasons set forth above, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
RESOURCE AND RESERVE ESTIMATES
Certain documents filed as Exhibits to this Annual Report have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the securities laws in effect in Canada, which differ from the requirements of United States securities laws. Unless otherwise indicated, all resource and reserve estimates included in such Exhibit documents have been prepared in accordance with Canadian National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”) and the Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy Classification System. NI 43-101 is a rule developed by the Canadian Securities Administrators, which establishes standards for all public disclosure an issuer makes of scientific and technical information concerning mineral projects. NI 43-101 permits an historical estimate made prior to the adoption of NI 43-101 that does not comply with NI 43-101 to be disclosed using the historical terminology if the disclosure: (a) identifies the source and date of the historical estimate; (b) comments on the relevance and reliability of the historical estimate; (c) states whether the historical estimate uses categories other than those prescribed by NI 43-101; and (d) includes any more recent estimates or data available.
Canadian standards, including NI 43-101, differ significantly from the requirements of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”), and resource information contained in the Exhibit documents may not be comparable to similar information disclosed by U.S. companies. In particular, and without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the term “resource” does not equate to the term “reserves.” Under U.S. standards, mineralization may not be classified as a “reserve” unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the reserve determination is made. The Commission’s disclosure standards normally do not permit the inclusion of information concerning “measured mineral resources,” “indicated mineral resources” or “inferred mineral resources” or other descriptions of the amount of mineralization in mineral deposits that do not constitute “reserves” by U.S. standards in documents filed with the Commission. U.S. investors should also understand that “inferred mineral resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an “inferred mineral resource” will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimated “inferred mineral resources” may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies except in rare cases. Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an “inferred mineral resource” exists or is economically or legally mineable. Disclosure of “contained ounces” in a resource is permitted disclosure under Canadian regulations; however, the Commission normally only permits issuers to report mineralization that does not constitute “reserves” by Commission standards as in-place tonnage and grade without reference to unit measures. The requirements of NI 43-101 for identification of “reserves” are also not the same as those of the Commission, and reserves reported by the Company in compliance with NI 43-101 may not qualify as “reserves” under Commission standards. Accordingly, information concerning mineral deposits set forth herein may not be comparable with information made public by companies that report in accordance with U.S. standards.
CURRENCY
Unless otherwise indicated, all dollar amounts in this Annual Report are in Canadian dollars. The exchange rate of Canadian dollars into U.S. dollars, based upon the noon rate of exchange as reported by the Bank of Canada was U.S.$1.00 = Cdn.$0.9949 on December 31, 2012, and was U.S.$1.00 = Cdn.$1.0148 on April 2, 2013.
4
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The following documents are filed as Exhibits to this Annual Report are hereby incorporated by reference herein:
the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the “AIF”);
the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2012; and
the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company as at and for the year ended December 31, 2012 and as at and for the nine-month period ended December 31, 2011, including the notes thereto, together with the Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm thereon (the “Financial Statements”).
The Company prepares its Financial Statements, which are filed as Exhibit 99.3 to this Annual Report, in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IFRS”), and such standards are subject to Canadian auditing and auditor independence standards. IFRS differs in some significant respects from generally accepting accounting principles in the United States of America, and thus the Company’s financial statements may not be comparable to financial statements of U.S. companies. Effective December 31, 2011, the Company changed its fiscal year end from March 31 to December 31.
DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act). Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Commission rules and forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
MANAGEMENT’S ANNUAL REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management conducted an evaluation of the design and operation of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on the criteria set forth in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. This evaluation included review of the documentation of controls, evaluation of the design effectiveness of controls, testing of the operating effectiveness of controls and a conclusion on this evaluation. Based on this evaluation, management has concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2012 and no material weaknesses were discovered.
ATTESTATION REPORT OF THE REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Company qualifies as an “emerging growth company” under Section 3 of the Exchange Act, as a result of enactment of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”). Under the JOBS Act, "emerging growth companies" are exempt from Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which generally requires that a public company’s registered public accounting firm provide an attestation report relating to management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting. The Company qualifies as an "emerging growth company" and therefore has not included in, or incorporated by reference into, this Annual Report such an attestation report as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report.
CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
During the period covered by this Annual Report, no changes occurred in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
The Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that its disclosure controls and procedures or internal procedures will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion by two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls is also based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and may not be detected.
5
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The Company’s board of directors (the “Board”) consists of the following individuals: Brian E. Bayley, David M. Cole, M. Stephen Enders, Brian K. Levet, George K. C. Lim, James A. Morris and Michael D. Winn. The Board has determined that Messrs. Bayley, Levet, Lim and Morris are “independent directors” under Section 803A of the NYSE MKT Company Guide (the “Company Guide”).
A copy of the mandate of the Board and the charters for the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Corporate Governance Committee are available on the Company’s Internet website at www.eurasianminerals.com, under the heading “Values.”
AUDIT COMMITTEE
The Board has a separately designated standing Audit Committee established for the purpose of overseeing the accounting and financial reporting processes of the Company and audits of the financial statements of the Company in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. As of the date of this Annual Report, the Company’s Audit Committee is comprised of Messrs. Bayley, Lim and Morris, each of whom the Board has determined is independent under Section 803A of the Company Guide and Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act.
The Board has also determined that each member of the Audit Committee is financially literate, meaning each such member has the ability to read and understand a set of financial statements that present a breadth and level of complexity of the issues that can reasonably be expected to be raised by the Company’s financial statements. In addition, the Board has determined that the Audit Committee’s chairman, Mr. Lim, is an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of the rules of the Commission.
The information provided on Schedule A to the AIF, which includes the Audit Committee charter, and the information provided on Schedule B to the AIF, which includes certain Audit Committee matters, are hereby incorporated by reference herein. The Company’s Audit Committee charter is also available on the Company’s Internet website at www.eurasianminerals.com, under the heading “Values.”
CODE OF ETHICS
The Company has adopted a code of ethics that applies to directors, officers and employees of, and consultants to, the Company (the “Code of Ethics”). The Code of Ethics has been posted on the Company’s Internet website at www.eurasianminerals.com, under the heading “Values,” or may be obtained, without charge, upon request from the Company’s Corporate Secretary at (604) 688-6390.
6
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The total fees billed to the Company for professional services rendered by the Company’s principal accountants for the year ended December 31, 2012 and the nine-month period ended December 31, 2011 are as set forth on Schedule B to the AIF, under the heading “External Auditor Service Fees (By Category),” which is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
PRE-APPROVAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
The information provided on Schedule A to the AIF, and the information on Schedule B to the AIF under the heading “Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures,” are hereby incorporated by reference herein.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
The following table presents, as of December 31, 2012, the Company’s known contractual obligations, aggregated by type of contractual obligation as set forth below:
| | Payments due by period | |
| | | | | Less than | | | | | | | | | More than | |
Contractual Obligations | | Total | | | 1 year | | | 1-3 years | | | 3-5 years | | | 5 years | |
Long-Term Debt Obligations | $ | – | | $ | – | | $ | – | | $ | – | | $ | – | |
Capital (Finance) Lease | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | |
Obligations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating Lease Obligations | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | |
Purchase Obligations | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | |
Other Long-Term Liabilities | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | |
Reflected on the Registrant’s | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance Sheet under IFRS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | $ | – | | $ | – | | $ | – | | $ | – | | $ | – | |
7
NYSE MKT CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The Company’s common shares are listed on the NYSE MKT LLC (the “NYSE MKT”). Section 110 of the Company Guide permits the NYSE MKT to consider the laws, customs and practices of foreign issuers in permitting deviations from certain NYSE MKT listing criteria, and to grant exemptions from certain NYSE MKT listing criteria based on these considerations. A company seeking relief under these provisions is required to provide written certification from independent local counsel that the non-complying practice is not prohibited by home country law. A description of the significant ways in which the Company’s governance practices differ from those followed by U.S. domestic companies pursuant to the Company Guide is set forth below.
Corporate Governance Committee. Section 804 of the MKT Guide generally requires that a listed company’s board nominations must be either selected, or recommended for the board’s selection, by a nominating committee comprised solely of independent directors or by a majority of the independent directors. The Company’s Corporate Governance Committee is currently comprised of Messrs. Levet, Lim and Winn. Mr. Winn, however, is not considered independent under Section 803A of the Company Guide.
Quorum for Shareholders’ Meetings. Section 123 of the Company Guide recommends that a listed company’s bylaws provide for a quorum of not less than 33 1/3 percent of such company’s shares issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at a meeting of shareholders. The Company’s articles of incorporation (which are the equivalent of bylaws under the Company’s home country law) generally provide that, subject to special rights and restrictions attached to any class or series of shares, the quorum for the transaction of business at a meeting of shareholders is two shareholders who are present in person or represented by proxy.
Proxy Delivery.The Company Guide requires the solicitation of proxies and delivery of proxy statements for all shareholder meetings of a listed company, and requires that these proxies be solicited pursuant to a proxy statement that conforms to Commission proxy rules. The Company is a “foreign private issuer” under Rule 3b-4 of the Exchange Act, and the equity securities of the Company are accordingly exempt from the proxy rules set forth in Sections 14(a), 14(b), 14(c) and 14(f) of the Exchange Act. The Company solicits proxies in accordance with applicable rules and regulations in Canada.
Shareholder Approval Requirements. NYSE MKT requires a listed company to obtain the approval of its shareholders for certain types of securities issuances, including private placements that may result in the issuance of common shares (or securities convertible into common shares) equal to 20 percent or more of presently outstanding shares for less than the greater of book or market value of the shares. The Company may seek a waiver from NYSE MKT’s shareholder approval requirements in circumstances where the securities issuance would not trigger such a requirement under British Columbia law or under the rules of the TSX Venture Exchange, on which the Company’s common shares are also listed.
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
None.
UNDERTAKING AND CONSENT TO SERVICE OF PROCESS
The Company undertakes to make available, in person or by telephone, representatives to respond to inquiries made by the Commission staff, and to furnish promptly, when requested to do so by the Commission staff, information relating to: the securities registered pursuant to Form 40-F; the securities in relation to which the obligation to file an annual report on Form 40-F arises; or transactions in said securities.
The Company has previously filed with the Commission a written consent to service of process and power of attorney on Form F-X. Any change to the name or address of the Company’s agent for service shall be communicated promptly to the Commission by amendment to the Form F-X referencing the file number of the Company.
8
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 40-F and has duly caused this Annual Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereto duly authorized.
| EURASIAN MINERALS INC. |
| | |
| | |
| By: | /s/ David M. Cole |
| | Name: David M. Cole |
| | Title: President and Chief Executive Officer |
Date: April 2, 2013
9
EXHIBIT INDEX
The following documents are being filed with the Commission as Exhibits to this Annual Report.
Exhibit | Description |
| |
99.1 | Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2012 |
| |
99.2 | Management’s Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2012 |
| |
99.3 | Audited Consolidated Financial Statements as at and for the year ended December 31, 2012 and as at and for the nine-month period ended December 31, 2011, including the notes thereto, together with the Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm thereon |
| |
99.4 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| |
99.5 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| |
99.6 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| |
99.7 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| |
99.8 | Consent of Davidson & Company LLP |
| |
99.9 | Consent of John E. Dreier |
| |
99.10 | Consent of Gary H. Giroux |
| |
99.11 | Consent of Duncan Large |
| |
99.12 | Consent of Simon Meldrum |
| |
99.13 | Consent of Michael P. Sheehan |
| |
99.14 | Consent of Mesut Soylu |
| |
99.15 | Consent of Chris Spurway |
| |
99.16 | Consent of Dean Turner |
| |
99.17 | Consent of Andrew J. Vigar |
10