Cash used in investing activities was $64.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, a decrease of $42.3 million compared to the first half of 2005. During the first six months of 2005, we acquired three operating properties and several development land parcels for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $85.3 million. During the first six months of 2006, we invested approximately $34.3 million in our development properties compared to approximately $22.5 million in the first six months of 2005. During the first six months of 2006, we also realized net proceeds of $11.1 million from the termination of our lease with Marsh Supermarkets at Naperville Marketplace and the related sale of this asset.
Cash provided by financing activities was $49.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, a decrease of $49.8 million compared to the first half of 2005. The majority of this change results from an increase in loan payoffs. In addition, distributions paid to shareholders and unitholders in the first half of 2006 increased by approximately $3.6 million compared to the first half of 2005 due to an increase in the number of shares outstanding.
Funds From Operations (“FFO”), is a widely used performance measure for real estate companies and is provided here as a supplemental measure of operating performance. We calculate FFO in accordance with the best practices described in the April 2002 National Policy Bulletin of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT), which we refer to as the White Paper. The White Paper defines FFO as net income (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of property, plus depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.
Given the nature of our business as a real estate owner and operator, we believe that FFO is helpful to investors as a starting point in measuring our operational performance because it excludes various items included in net income that do not relate to or are not indicative of our operating performance, such as gains (or losses) from sales of property and depreciation and amortization, which can make periodic and peer analyses of operating performance more difficult. FFO should not be considered as an alternative to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP) as an indicator of our financial performance, is not an alternative to cash flow from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) as a measure of our liquidity, and is not indicative of funds available to satisfy our cash needs, including our ability to make distributions. Our computation of FFO may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs that do not define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or that interpret the current NAREIT definitions differently than we do.
The following table reconciles our net income to FFO for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 (unaudited):
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We currently do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future material effect on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
Related Party Transactions
In connection with our initial public offering, we entered into service contracts and other arrangements with Kite, Inc., which provides interior construction services and in which Al Kite, John Kite and Paul Kite owned interests. In May 2006, Al Kite, John Kite and Paul Kite (the son of Al Kite and brother of John Kite) sold their interests in, and are no longer affiliated with, Kite, Inc.
During the second quarter of 2006, our affiliate, Kite Realty Advisors, LLC, entered into a one-year contract with Circle Block Partners, LLC (“Circle Block”), owner of the Conrad Hotel in Indianapolis, Indiana, to provide investment management services to Circle Block for an annual fee of $100,000 in connection with the hotel’s operations. Circle Block is owned by Al Kite, John Kite, Paul Kite and Tom McGowan, and we have several existing arrangements with Circle Block, including fee-based construction management contracts. In addition, our affiliate, KRG Development, LLC, has entered into an agreement with Circle Block pursuant to which Kite Realty Development, LLC may, from time to time, assist in arranging financing for Circle Block projects. KRG Development, LLC received a financing fee of $85,000 from Circle Block during the first six months of 2006 for services rendered to arrange debt financing for Circle Block pursuant to this arrangement.
KMI Management, LLC, in which Al Kite, John Kite, Paul Kite and Tom McGowan own direct or indirect interests, and the Company are parties to various arrangements, including a lease agreement that we entered into in connection with our initial public offering in 2004, and pursuant to which our operating partnership is entitled to lease from KMI Management the use of an airplane owned by KMI Management from time to time for company-related business. In August 2006, we entered into a management agreement, effective as of January 1, 2006, providing for payments, based on an hourly rate, for our usage of the airplane.
All of the above transactions entered into subsequent to the date of our initial public offering were approved by the independent members of the Board of Trustees. The Company does not believe any of the related party transactions discussed above will have a material impact on the Company’s liquidity or results of operations.
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
Our future income, cash flows and fair values relevant to financial instruments depend upon prevailing interest rates. Market risk refers to the risk of loss from adverse changes in interest rates of debt instruments of similar maturities and terms.
Market Risk Related to Fixed Rate Debt
We had approximately $439.2 million of outstanding consolidated indebtedness as of June 30, 2006 (inclusive of net premiums on acquired debt of $2.5 million). We have entered into interest rate swaps totaling $50 million to hedge variable cash flows associated with existing variable rate debt. Including the effects of these swaps, our fixed and variable rate debt was approximately $278.3 million (64%) and $158.4 million (36%), respectively, of our total consolidated indebtedness at June 30, 2006.
Based on the amount of our fixed rate debt, a 100 basis point increase in market interest rates would result in a decrease in the fair value of our fixed rate debt of approximately $10.9 million. A 100 basis point decrease in market interest rates would result in an increase in the fair value of our fixed rate debt of approximately $11.8 million. A 100 basis point increase or decrease in interest rates on our variable rate debt as of June 30, 2006 would increase or decrease our annual cash flow by approximately $1.6 million.
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of June 30, 2006 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
21
Part II. Other Information
The Company is party to various actions representing routine litigation and administrative proceedings arising out of the ordinary course of business. None of these actions are expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows taken as a whole.
The discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read together with the risks described below, the risk factors contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, which describe various risks and uncertainties to which we are or may become subject, and any additional risks that may be identified in our future filings with the SEC. The risks and uncertainties described below, in our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K, in the other information contained and incorporated by reference in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and in the descriptions included in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes thereto, are not the only ones facing us and there may be additional risks that we do not presently know of or that we currently consider not likely to have a significant impact. All of these risks could adversely affect our business , financial condition, operating results and cash flows. In addition to the risks identified in our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K, we are also subject to the following additional risks:
Our results of operations will be significantly influenced by the economies of the markets in which we operate, and the market for retail space generally.
We are susceptible to adverse developments in the markets in which we operate, such as business layoffs or downsizing, industry slowdowns, relocations of businesses, changing demographics, increased Internet shopping, infrastructure quality, state budgetary constraints and priorities, increases in real estate and other taxes, costs of complying with government regulations or increased regulation and other factors. As of June 30, 2006, 31% of our retail operating and development owned gross leasable area and 100% of our commercial operating square footage were located in the state of Indiana. In addition, through our 2006 acquisitions, Florida has become our second-largest retail operating market. Our concentration in Indiana and our increased activity in Florida exposes us to greater economic risks than if we owned properties in numerous geographic regions, including, for example, increased insurance costs in Florida resulting from the adverse weather-related events in Florida, primarily hurricanes, which affect both our insurance costs and the insurance costs of our tenants and potential tenants. Any adverse economic or real estate developments in Indiana or Florida and the surrounding regions or any of the other markets in which we operate, or any decrease in demand for retail space resulting from the local regulatory environment, business climate or fiscal problems, could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, the trading price of our common shares and our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations and to pay distributions to our shareholders. Moreover, because our portfolio of properties consists primarily of community and neighborhood shopping centers, a decrease in the demand for retail space may have a greater adverse effect on our business and financial condition than if we owned a more diversified real estate portfolio. The market for retail space has been and could be adversely affected by weakness in the national, regional and local economies, the adverse financial condition of some large retailing companies, the ongoing consolidation in the retail sector, the excess amount of retail space in a number of markets, and increasing consumer purchases through catalogues or the Internet. To the extent that any of these conditions occur, they are likely to affect market rents for retail space and could harm our business.
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
Not Applicable
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
Not Applicable
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
The 2006 annual meeting of shareholders for Kite Realty Group Trust took place on May 4, 2006. At the meeting, shareholders elected seven trustees to serve a one-year term expiring at the 2007 annual meeting of shareholders. Each of the nominees as listed in the Company’s proxy statement was elected. The number of shares voted for or withheld as to each nominee was as follows:
Nominee | | For | | Withheld | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Alvin E. Kite, Jr. | | | 25,825,612 | | | 25,830 | |
John A. Kite | | | 25,846,558 | | | 4,884 | |
William E. Bindley | | | 25,778,533 | | | 72,909 | |
Dr. Richard A. Cosier | | | 25,821,458 | | | 29,984 | |
Eugene Golub | | | 25,803,183 | | | 48,259 | |
Gerald L. Moss | | | 22,193,070 | | | 3,658,372 | |
Michael L. Smith | | | 25,655,358 | | | 196,084 | |
At the annual meeting, the shareholders also voted to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young, LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006. The number of shares voted for, against and abstaining on this proposal was as follows:
| | For | | Against | | Abstain | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Ratification of Ernst & Young, LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm | | | 25,847,563 | | | 2,670 | | | 1,270 | |
On May 4, 2006, the Board of Trustees adopted the Kite Realty Group Trust Trustee Deferred Compensation Plan, a copy of which is filed as Exhibit 10.1 to this Form 10-Q, and which is incorporated by reference into this Item 5.
22
Exhibit No. | | Description | | Location |
| |
| |
|
10.1 | | Kite Realty Group Trust Trustee Deferred Compensation Plan* | | Filed herewith |
| | | | |
10.2 | | Schedule of 2006 Bonus Benchmarks for Executive Officers* | | Filed herewith |
| | | | |
31.1 | | Certification of principal executive officer required by Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | | Filed herewith |
| | | | |
31.2 | | Certification of principal financial officer required by Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | | Filed herewith |
| | | | |
32.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | | Filed herewith |
|
* | Denotes a management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement |
23
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| KITE REALTY GROUP TRUST |
| | |
| By: | /s/ John A. Kite |
| |
|
| | John A. Kite |
August 9, 2006 | | Chief Executive Officer and President |
(Date) | | (Principal Executive Officer) |
| | |
| | |
| By: | /s/ Daniel R. Sink |
| |
|
| | Daniel R. Sink |
| | Chief Financial Officer |
August 9, 2006 | | (Principal Financial Officer and |
(Date) | | Principal Accounting Officer) |
24