Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) 8-K Regulation FD Disclosure

EXHIBIT 99.1

Kite Realty Group Trust
Investor Presentation
Information as of March 31, 2010

2

§Stable Operating Portfolio	§55 Operating Properties in 9 states §91% leased §Diverse tenant base:Largest tenant contributes 3.4% of annualized base rent §5 mile demographics:Population 120,000; Average HHI $83,000
§Increased Leasing Productivity	§345,600 square feet of new and renewal leases executed in Q1 2010 §An additional 200,000 square feet anticipated for Q2 2010 §Macy’s at Glendale Town Center renewed early
§Proven Debt Management	§No remaining 2010 debt maturities §$170 million of property refinancings and extensions since early 2009 §Of the 2011 maturities, only 2 are CMBS loans totaling $20 million §82% of maturities through 2012 held by relationship lenders
§Development Upside	§ Two in-process developments - Eddy Street Commons & Cobblestone Plaza §Combined 75% leased but only 41% occupied with tenants in construction §Executed Whole Foods lease at Cobblestone Plaza in Florida §Rent commencements 2010-2011

Information as of March 31, 2010

COMPANY OVERVIEW

3

§Rent commencement on executed Jr anchor leases

§Jr anchor leases in negotiation

§Return to normal small shop occupancy

§Execute on the redevelopments

§Complete the current developments

§Future development potential

§Joint venture capital

GROWTH SOURCES

4

§We have made a concerted effort to improve the quality and predictability of
our FFO stream.

Real Estate Rental Operations as a Percent of FFO(1)

(1)2010 as projected within the Company’s previously released earnings guidance.

IMPROVING FFO QUALITY

5

(1)Annualized base rent represents the monthly contractual rent for March 2010 for each applicable tenant multiplied by 12.

(2)S&P credit ratings for parent company as of 6/3/10.

§Largest single retail tenant comprises only 3.4% of total annualized base rent

§Top 10 retail tenants account for only 22.9% of total annualized base rent

Information as of March 31, 2010

(unless otherwise noted)

DIVERSE TENANT BASE

6

Peer Group Assessment:

Top Tenant as a Percent of Annualized Base Rent

Kroger Bed Bath
Beyond Home
Depot Publix TJ Maxx Wal-Mart/
Sam’s Kroger A&P Supervalu Publix Giant
Foods

Source: Company SEC filings.

Information as of March 31, 2010

DIVERSE TENANT BASE

7

Source: Applied Geographic Solutions.

§High quality assets with an average age of only eight years

§Approximately half of the current portfolio was developed by KRG

§Portfolio benefits from 100% non-owned anchor occupancy

§Strong household incomes surrounding operating portfolio and development pipelines

Portfolio Demographics Comparison

Operating Portfolio vs. Development Pipelines

STRONG DEMOGRAPHICS

8

(1)Lease expirations of operating portfolio and excludes option periods and ground leases. Annualized base rent represents the monthly contractual rent
for December 2009 for each applicable property multiplied by 12.

§No more than 13.3% of total annualized rent is expected to rollover in any one year

§Higher 2011-2015 rollover defers renewal negotiations to a potentially stronger
leasing environment

Percentage of Lease Expiration by Total Annualized Base Rent (1)

Information as of March 31, 2010

WELL-STAGGERED LEASE EXPIRATIONS

9

Peer Group Assessment:

Debt Plus Preferred as a Percent of Gross Assets

(1)Source:Company filings.

Calculation:(Consolidated Debt + Preferreds) / Gross Real Estate Assets

MANAGING LEVERAGE

10

Scheduled Debt Maturities (1)(2)(3)(4)

(1)Maturities exclude annual principal amortization.

(2)Includes effects of loan closings, payoffs, and commitments that occurred subsequent to March 31, 2010.

(3)Amount due in 2012 includes the outstanding balance on our unsecured revolving credit facility, and assumes exercise of available extension option.

(4)Dollars in thousands.

§Extended or refinanced all 2010 debt maturities by February 2010

§2011 maturities are in process:

§Only 2 CMBS loans totaling $20 million

§5 of 7 property loans held on balance sheet were underwritten with more stringent 2008-09 standards

§Approximately 82% of debt maturities through 2012 are held on balance sheet by relationship banks including
unsecured term loan

MANAGING LEVERAGE

11

§Eddy Street Commons at Notre Dame

§75% pre-leased or committed

§89% of projected costs incurred

In-Process Developments

§Capital Summary(Dollars in thousands)

§Eddy Street Estimated Project Costs:$35,000

§Cobblestone Plaza Estimated Project Costs:$52,000

§Total Cost Incurred as of 3/31/10:($77,757)

§Remaining Cost to be Spent:$9,243

§Cobblestone Plaza, Ft. Lauderdale, FL

§74% pre-leased with Whole Foods executed lease

§89% of projected costs incurred

Information as of March 31, 2010

DEVELOPMENT STATUS

12

§Assuming a peer group average
multiple of 13.8x, our stock is
trading at a 21% discount

(1)Source:Thomson mean 2010 estimate as of June 3, 2010.

Peer Group Assessment:

FFO Multiple

PEER GROUP ANALYSIS

13

Peer Group Assessment:

2010 ESTIMATED AFFO PAYOUT RATIO

(1)Source:SNL Financial.Based on most recently announced quarterly dividend annualized.

PEER GROUP ANALYSIS

14

2010 FFO Guidance

§Estimated FFO guidance range of $0.42 to $0.47 per diluted share

§Includes the full year effect of the May 2009 common equity offering;

§Portfolio leased percentage ranging from 90% to 92% at December 31, 2010;

§A decrease in same property net operating income ranging from 0.0% to 2.0%;

§An interest rate environment consistent with the current forward yield curve for one month LIBOR
and the 10-year US Treasury note;

§Transactional FFO ranging from $0.01 to $0.03 on a pretax basis;

§General and administrative expense ranging from approximately $5.5 million to $5.8 million;

§No material acquisition or disposition activity;

§Construction and service fee net margin ranging from $0.01 to $0.03 on a pretax basis.

GUIDANCE

15

DISCLAIMER

This presentation contains certain statements that are not historical fact and may constitute forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.Such forward-
looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the
actual results of the Company to differ materially from historical results or from any results expressed or
implied by such forward-looking statements, including, without limitation: national and local economic,
business, real estate and other market conditions, particularly in light of the current recession; financing
risks, including the availability of and costs associated with sources of liquidity; the Company’s ability to
refinance, or extend the maturity dates of, its indebtedness; the level and volatility of interest rates; the
financial stability of tenants, including their ability to pay rent and the risk of tenant bankruptcies; the
competitive environment in which the Company operates; acquisition, disposition, development and joint
venture risks; property ownership and management risks; the Company’s ability to maintain its status as a
real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes; potential environmental and other
liabilities; impairment in the value of real estate property the Company owns; risks related to the
geographical concentration of our properties in Indiana, Florida and Texas; and other factors affecting the
real estate industry generally. The Company refers you the documents filed by the Company from time to
time with the Securities and Exchange Commission, specifically the section titled “Business Risk Factors”
in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, which discuss
these and other factors that could adversely affect the Company’s results.The Company undertakes no
obligation to publicly update or revise these forward-looking statements (including the FFO and net income
estimates), whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.