Exhibit 99.1
The Predecessor Companies of
Service Corporation International
(Formerly Known as Certain Wholly-Owned
Subsidiaries of Service Corporation
International)
Combined Financial Statements for the
Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007
and Independent Auditor’s Report
| | |
INDEX TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | | Page |
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT | | 1 |
| |
COMBINED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007 | | 2 |
| |
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007 | | 3 |
| |
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN OWNER’S DEFICIT FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007 | | 4 |
| |
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007 | | 5 |
| |
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | | 6 |
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
To the Board of Directors of Service Corporation International
Houston, Texas
We have audited the accompanying combined balance sheets of the Predecessor Companies of Service Corporation International as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the combined statements of operations, changes in owner’s deficit, and cash flows for the years then ended. These combined financial statements are the responsibility of the Service Corporation International management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these combined financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform our audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the combined financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Predecessor Companies of Service Corporation International as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America.
As discussed in Note 1 to the combined financial statements, the Predecessor Companies’ financial statements include certain intercompany charges from Service Corporation International. These combined financial statements are not representative of results that would have been attained if the Predecessor Companies had operated as a stand-alone entity.
/s/ Harper & Pearson Company, P.C.
Houston, Texas
March 29, 2010
1
THE PREDECESSOR COMPANIES OF SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
COMBINED BALANCE SHEETS
| | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Assets | | | | | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | | | | |
Cash | | $ | 2 | | | $ | 2 | |
Receivables, net | | | 2 | | | | 28 | |
Inventories | | | 422 | | | | 451 | |
Income taxes | | | 48 | | | | 108 | |
Other current assets | | | 3 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total current assets | | | 477 | | | | 589 | |
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments | | | 41,003 | | | | 62,271 | |
Cemetery property, at cost, net of impairment | | | 2,833 | | | | 15,590 | |
Property and equipment, net | | | 5,751 | | | | 5,999 | |
Deferred charges and other assets | | | 2,917 | | | | 2,910 | |
Cemetery perpetual care trust investments | | | 13,150 | | | | 16,280 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 5,585 | | | | 495 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Assets | | $ | 71,716 | | | $ | 104,134 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Liabilities and Owner’s Deficit | | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | $ | 821 | | | $ | 451 | |
Current portion of capital lease obligations | | | 13 | | | | 19 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 378 | | | | 520 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total current liabilities | | | 1,212 | | | | 990 | |
Capital lease obligations extending beyond one year | | | 4 | | | | 17 | |
Deferred preneed cemetery revenues | | | 625 | | | | 3,589 | |
Other liabilities | | | 137 | | | | 146 | |
Deferred preneed cemetery receipts held in trust | | | 38,391 | | | | 58,936 | |
Care trusts’ corpus | | | 13,150 | | | | 16,280 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 53,519 | | | | 79,958 | |
Commitments and contingencies | | | | | | | | |
Advances from affiliate, net | | | 70,248 | | | | 67,518 | |
Owner’s deficit | | | (52,051 | ) | | | (43,342 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Liabilities and Owner’s Deficit | | $ | 71,716 | | | $ | 104,134 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See notes to combined financial statements.
2
THE PREDECESSOR COMPANIES OF SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
| | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended December 31, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Revenues | | | | | | | | |
Merchandise revenues | | $ | 2,224 | | | $ | 2,302 | |
Services revenues | | | 2,297 | | | | 2,306 | |
Trust revenues | | | 1,363 | | | | 1,099 | |
Cemetery property revenues | | | 1,149 | | | | 767 | |
Other | | | 138 | | | | 325 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | | | 7,171 | | | | 6,799 | |
Costs and Expenses | | | | | | | | |
Merchandise costs and expenses | | | (1,053 | ) | | | (722 | ) |
Service costs and expenses | | | (42 | ) | | | (54 | ) |
Cemetery property costs and expenses | | | (164 | ) | | | (53 | ) |
Other | | | (667 | ) | | | (853 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Total costs and expenses | | | (1,926 | ) | | | (1,682 | ) |
Gross profits | | | 5,245 | | | | 5,117 | |
General and administrative expenses | | | (5,070 | ) | | | (5,444 | ) |
Losses on dispositions of assets and impairment charges, net | | | (12,962 | ) | | | (1,615 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Operating loss | | | (12,787 | ) | | | (1,942 | ) |
Other expense, net | | | (2 | ) | | | (34 | ) |
Interest expense | | | (2 | ) | | | (482 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Loss before income tax benefit | | | (12,791 | ) | | | (2,458 | ) |
Income tax benefit | | | 4,082 | | | | 815 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (8,709 | ) | | $ | (1,643 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
See notes to combined financial statements.
3
THE PREDECESSOR COMPANIES OF SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN OWNER’S DEFICIT
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Advances to Affiliates, Net | | Owner’s Equity | | Accumulated Deficit | | | Total Owner’s Deficit | | | Total | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Balance at December 31, 2006 | | $ | 60,655 | | $ | 29,695 | | $ | (71,394 | ) | | $ | (41,699 | ) | | $ | 18,956 | |
Reclassification of advances from affiliate, net | | | 6,863 | | | — | | | — | | | | — | | | | 6,863 | |
Net loss | | | — | | | — | | | (1,643 | ) | | | (1,643 | ) | | | (1,643 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2007 | | | 67,518 | | | 29,695 | | | (73,037 | ) | | | (43,342 | ) | | | 24,176 | |
Reclassification of advances from affiliate, net | | | 2,730 | | | — | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,730 | |
Net loss | | | — | | | — | | | (8,709 | ) | | | (8,709 | ) | | | (8,709 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2008 | | $ | 70,248 | | $ | 29,695 | | $ | (81,746 | ) | | $ | (52,051 | ) | | $ | 18,197 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See notes to combined financial statements.
4
THE PREDECESSOR COMPANIES OF SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW
| | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended December 31, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| | (In Thousands) | |
Cash flows from operating activities | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (8,709 | ) | | $ | (1,643 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used) provided by operating activities | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation | | | 267 | | | | 322 | |
Benefit for deferred income taxes | | | (5,172 | ) | | | 25 | |
Losses on dispositions of assets and impairment charges, net | | | 12,962 | | | | 1,615 | |
Change in assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Decrease in receivables | | | 26 | | | | 180 | |
Decrease (increase) in inventory | | | 29 | | | | (1 | ) |
Increase in cemetery property | | | (205 | ) | | | (236 | ) |
(Increase) decrease in other assets | | | (10 | ) | | | 71 | |
Increase (decrease) in payables and other liabilities | | | 361 | | | | (91 | ) |
Net effect of preneed cemetery production and maturities: | | | | | | | | |
Decrease (increase) in preneed cemetery receivables and trusts investments | | | 744 | | | | (7,625 | ) |
Decrease in deferred preneed cemetery revenue | | | (2,964 | ) | | | (953 | ) |
(Decrease) increase in deferred preneed cemetery receipts held in trust | | | (21 | ) | | | 8,504 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash (used) provided by operating activities | | | (2,692 | ) | | | 168 | |
Cash flows from investing activities | | | | | | | | |
Capital expenditures | | | (19 | ) | | | (71 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (19 | ) | | | (71 | ) |
Cash flows from financing activities | | | | | | | | |
Advances from affiliate | | | 2,730 | | | | 6,863 | |
Payments of capital leases and long-term debt (2007) | | | (19 | ) | | | (6,960 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided (used) in financing activities | | | 2,711 | | | | (97 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net change in cash | | | — | | | | — | |
Cash at beginning of period | | | 2 | | | | 2 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash at end of period | | $ | 2 | | | $ | 2 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See notes to combined financial statements.
5
THE PREDECESSOR COMPANIES OF SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation
The accompanying financial statements present the combined financial position, results of operations, changes in owner’s deficit, and cash flows of the Predecessor Companies formerly known as certain wholly owned subsidiaries of Service Corporation International (“SCI”). These financial statements include the accounts of nine cemeteries, nine management companies and one casket warehouse (collectively, the “Predecessor Companies”) being purchased by StoneMor Operating LLC as outlined in a Letter of Intent dated November 18, 2009 and referred to as Project Dignity 2009.
The combined financial statements of the Predecessor Companies contained herein reflect the financial position at December 31, 2008 and 2007 for the Predecessor Companies on those dates, and the results of operations, changes in owner’s deficit, and cash flows for the Predecessor Companies for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007. All of the Predecessor Companies were acquired by SCI prior to the earliest year presented.
The Predecessor Companies’ cemetery and casket warehouse operations consist of cemeteries, crematoria, and related businesses. Cemeteries provide cemetery property interment rights, including mausoleum spaces, lots, and lawn crypts, and sell cemetery-related merchandise and services, including stone and bronze memorials, markers, casket and cremation memorialization products, merchandise installations, and burial openings and closings. The casket warehouse stores caskets related to future burials. The Predecessor Companies also sell cemetery products and services whereby a customer contractually agrees to the terms of certain products and services to be provided in the future.
All significant inter-entity balances and transactions between the Predecessor Companies have been eliminated in the combined financial statements.
The preparation of these financial statements include the use of “carve out” accounting procedures wherein certain assets, liabilities and expenses historically recorded or incurred by SCI at the Parent level, which relate to or were incurred on behalf of the Predecessor Companies, have been identified by management and management believes they have been allocated as appropriate to properly reflect the stand-alone financial results of the Predecessor Companies.
In the ordinary course of business, SCI provided various services to the Predecessor Companies, including accounting, treasury, tax, legal, human resources, public affairs, the use of centralized facilities and assets owned by SCI, and executive oversight. The costs of performing these services have been allocated to these Predecessor Companies based on the Predecessor Companies’ total revenue as a percent of SCI’s total revenue. Both SCI and the Predecessor Companies consider these cost allocations to be reasonable reflections of the cost of services provided. Charges for these services included inGeneral and administrative expenses totaled $0.7 million and $0.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
As a part of the centralized treasury system, cash was either advanced or drawn from SCI with a corresponding decrease or increase toAdvance from affiliate, net. As a result, all charges and cost allocations to the Predecessor Companies covered by such centralized treasury systems were deemed to have been paid by the Predecessor Companies to SCI, in cash, during the period in which the related costs were recorded in the combined financial statements. Increases or decreases inAdvances from affiliate, netare classified as financing activities in the combined statement of cash flows.
All of the allocations and estimates in these combined financial statements are based on assumptions that management believes are reasonable under the circumstances. However, these allocations and estimates are not necessarily indicative of the costs and expenses that would have resulted had the Predecessor Companies been operated as a stand-alone, independent entity.
6
THE PREDECESSOR COMPANIES OF SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements
The preparation of the combined financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that may affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the combined financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. As a result, actual results could differ from these estimates.
Major Vendors
The Predecessor Companies purchased all markers from one vendor in 2008 and 2007.
Cemetery Operations
Revenue associated with sales of cemetery merchandise and services is recognized when the service is performed or merchandise is delivered. The Predecessor Companies’ cemetery trade receivables consist of amounts due for services already performed and merchandise already delivered. An allowance for doubtful accounts has been provided based on historical experience. Revenue associated with sales of preneed cemetery interment rights is recognized in accordance with the Revenue Recognition Topics of the Financial Accounting Standards Boards Accounting Standards Codification (ASC). Under this guidance, revenue from constructed cemetery property is not recognized until 10% of the sales price has been collected. Revenue related to the preneed sale of unconstructed cemetery property is deferred until it is constructed and 10% of the sales price is collected. Revenue associated with sales of preneed merchandise and services is not recognized until the merchandise is delivered or the services are performed. Allowances for customer cancellations for preneed cemetery contracts are based upon historical experience. For services and non-personalized merchandise (such as vaults), the Predecessor Companies defer the revenues until the services are performed and the merchandise is delivered. For personalized marker merchandise, with the customer’s direction generally obtained at the time of sale, the Predecessor Companies can choose to order, store, and transfer title to the customer. In situations in which the Predecessor Companies have no further obligation or involvement related to the merchandise, the Predecessor Companies recognize revenues and record the cost of sales in accordance with the Revenue Recognition Topic of the ASC upon the earlier of vendor storage of these items or delivery in the Predecessor Companies’ cemetery. Sales taxes collected are recognized on a net basis.
Pursuant to state law, all or a portion of the proceeds from cemetery merchandise or services sold on a preneed basis may be required to be paid into trust funds. The Predecessor Companies defer investment earnings related to these merchandise and services trusts until the associated merchandise is delivered or services are performed.
A portion of the proceeds from the sale of cemetery property interment rights is required by state law to be paid into perpetual care trust funds. Investment earnings from these trusts are distributed to the Predecessor Companies regularly, are recognized in current cemetery revenues and are intended to defray cemetery maintenance costs, which are expensed as incurred. The principal amount of such perpetual care trust funds generally cannot be withdrawn.
Costs related to the sale of property interment rights include the property and construction costs specifically identified by project. Upon completion of the project, construction costs are charged to expense in the same period revenue is recognized. Costs related to sales of merchandise and services are charged to expense when merchandise is delivered and when services are performed. See Note 3 to these combined financial statements regarding preneed cemetery activities.
7
THE PREDECESSOR COMPANIES OF SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Fair Value Measurements
The Predecessor Companies measure the available-for-sale securities held by the cemetery merchandise and service and cemetery perpetual care trusts at fair value on a recurring basis in accordance with the Fair Value Measurements Topic of the ASC. This guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about instruments measured at fair value. The guidance establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. The three levels are defined as follows:
| • | | Level 1 – inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets; |
| • | | Level 2 – inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument; |
| • | | Level 3 – inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. |
An asset’s or liability’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Certain private equity and other alternative investments held by the cemetery merchandise and service and cemetery perpetual care trusts have been classified in Level 3 of the hierarchy due to significant management judgment required as a result of the absence of quoted market prices, inherent lack of liquidity, or the long-term nature of the securities.
The provisions of the Fair Value Measurements Topic of the ASC have not been applied to the Predecessor Companies non-financial assets and liabilities. The major categories of assets and liabilities that are subject to non-recurring fair value measurement, for which the Predecessor Companies have not yet applied these provisions, are as follows: reporting units measured at fair value in the first step of a goodwill impairment test under the Intangibles – Goodwill and Other Topic of the ASC; indefinite-lived intangible assets measured at fair value for impairment assessment under the Intangibles – Goodwill and Other Topic of the ASC; non-financial assets measured at fair value for an impairment assessment under the Property, Plant, and Equipment Topic of the ASC; and non-financial assets and liabilities initially measured at fair value in a business combination under the Business Combinations Topic of the ASC.
Accounts Receivables and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The Predecessor Companies provide various allowances and/or cancellation reserves for their cemetery preneed and atneed receivables as well as for their preneed cemetery deferred revenues. These allowances are based on an analysis of historical trends and include, where applicable, collection and cancellation activity. Atneed cemetery receivables are considered past due after 30 days. Collections are managed by the Predecessor Companies until a receivable is 180 days delinquent at which time it is written off and sent to a collection agency. These estimates are impacted by a number of factors, including changes in economy, relocation, and demographic or competitive changes in the Predecessor Companies’ areas of operation.
Inventories and Cemetery Property
Cemetery merchandise is stated at the lower of average cost or market. Cemetery property is recorded at cost. Inventory costs and cemetery property are primarily relieved using specific identification in performance of a contract.
8
THE PREDECESSOR COMPANIES OF SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Property and Equipment, Net
Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense whereas renewals and major replacements that extend the assets useful lives are capitalized. Depreciation is recognized ratably over the estimated useful lives of the various classes of assets. Buildings and improvements are depreciated over a period ranging from seven to forty years, equipment is depreciated over a period from three to eight years and leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of the lease term or ten years. Depreciation expense related to property and equipment was $267 thousand and $322 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 includes $6 thousand and $24 thousand expense related to capital leases on certain transportation assets. When property is sold or retired, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the combined balance sheet; resulting gains and losses are included in the combined statement of operations in the period of sale or disposal.
The major asset categories, together with the related estimated useful lives and cost, are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Lives | | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| | | | (In thousands) | |
Land | | | | $ | 3,805 | | | $ | 3,805 | |
Buildings and improvements | | 7 - 40 yrs | | | 2,855 | | | | 2,840 | |
Operating equipment | | 3 - 8 yrs. | | | 1,082 | | | | 1,292 | |
Leasehold improvements | | 1 - 10 yrs | | | 908 | | | | 893 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | 8,650 | | | | 8,830 | |
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | | | | | (2,899 | ) | | | (2,831 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | $ | 5,751 | | | $ | 5,999 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
During 2008, the Predecessor Companies fully retired depreciated equipment with an original cost of approximately $200 thousand.
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
The Predecessor Companies review their long-lived assets for impairment when changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. Long-lived assets are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value. Fair value is based on the expected sale price of long-lived assets as discussed inNature of Operations and Basis of Presentation. Assets to be disposed of and assets not expected to provide any future service potential are recorded at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less estimated cost to sell. As part of the sale of the properties, the Predecessor Companies recognized an impairment of cemetery property in the approximate amount of $12.9 million and $1.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 respectively.
Preneed Cemetery Receivables, Net
Preneed cemetery receivables, net include customer receivables related to unperformed preneed cemetery receivables, net of allowance for cancellation. An allowance for cancellation is estimated based upon historical experience and is recorded as an adjustment to deferred preneed cemetery revenues, net, as appropriate. Cash flows from cemetery contracts are presented as operating cash flows in the accompanying combined statements of cash flows. The Predecessor Companies’ cancellation reserves are impacted by a number of factors, including changes in the economy, relocation, and demographic or competitive changes in the Predecessor Companies’ area of operations.
9
THE PREDECESSOR COMPANIES OF SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Long-term debt
In 2007, the Predecessor Companies paid $6.9 million upon the maturity of a debenture issued in connection with SCI’s original acquisition of certain of the Predecessor Companies’ locations. Interest paid on long-term debt was $480 thousand for the year ending December 31, 2007.
No debt or interest expense has been allocated to the Predecessor Companies from SCI. As a result, the Predecessor Companies’ Combined Statement of Operations may not necessarily be indicative of the results of operations that would have existed had the Predecessor Companies operated as a separate, independent company.
Leases
The Predecessor Companies have lease arrangements primarily related to storage and transportation equipment which were primarily classified as capital leases at December 31, 2008. Lease terms related to funeral home properties generally range from one to 35 years with options to renew at varying terms. Lease terms related to transportation equipment generally range from one to five years with options to renew at varying terms. The Predecessor Companies calculate operating lease expense ratably over the lease term. The Predecessor Companies consider reasonably assured renewal options and fixed escalation provisions in their calculation of operating lease expense. For more information related to leases, see Note 8 to these combined financial statements.
Income Taxes
Income taxes are computed using the liability method. Deferred taxes are provided on all temporary differences between the financial bases and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. The Predecessor Companies record a valuation allowance to reduce their deferred tax assets when uncertainty regarding their realization exists, by the Predecessor Companies or the Parent Company. Income taxes have been calculated as if the Predecessor Companies filed a separate return for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007. For more information related to income taxes, see Note 6 to the combined financial statements.
Subsequent Events
The Predecessor Companies have evaluated subsequent events through March 29, 2010. No subsequent events occurred which require adjustment or disclosure to the financial statements at December 31, 2008.
2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements and Accounting Changes
Accounting Standards Codification
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued additional guidance that modifies the GAAP hierarchy by establishing only two levels of GAAP, authoritative and nonauthoritative accounting literature. Effective July 2009, the FASB ASC, also known collectively as the “Codification,” is considered the single source of authoritative U.S. accounting and reporting standards, except for additional authoritative rules and interpretive releases issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The Codification was developed to organize GAAP pronouncements by topic so that users can more easily access authoritative accounting guidance. The Codification is organized by topic, subtopic, section, and paragraph, each of which is identified by a numerical designation. This statement applies to financial statements beginning in the third quarter 2009. Accordingly, all accounting references contained herein have been updated to reflect the Codification and all SFAS references have been replaced with ASC references.
10
THE PREDECESSOR COMPANIES OF SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Variable Interest Entities
In June 2009, the FASB amended its authoritative guidance to improve financial reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest entities (VIE). Specifically, the amended guidance addresses: (1) the impact resulting from the elimination of the qualifying special-purpose entity concept in previously issued guidance, and (2) constituent concerns about the application of certain key provisions of the existing guidance on the consolidation of variable interest entities, including those in which the accounting and disclosures under the existing guidance do not always provide timely and useful information about an enterprise’s involvement in a VIE. The amended guidance is effective for the Predecessor Companies on January 1, 2010, and its adoption will not impact the Predecessor Companies’ combined financial statements.
In December 2009, the FASB issued additional guidance on improving financial reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest entities by clarifying the principal objectives of required disclosures, which include: (1) the significant judgments and assumptions made by a reporting unit, 2) the nature of restrictions on a consolidated VIE’s assets reported by a reporting entity in its statement of financial position, including the carrying amounts of such assets and liabilities, (3) the nature of, and changes in, the risks associated with a reporting entity’s involvement with the VIE, and (4) how a reporting entity’s involvement with the VIE affects the reporting entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. The amended guidance is effective for the Predecessor Companies on January 1, 2010, and its adoption will not impact the Predecessor Companies’ combined financial statements.
Fair Value Measurements
In August 2009, the FASB issued additional guidance on how to determine the fair value of liabilities. The guidance provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, an entity is required to measure fair value utilizing one or more of the following techniques: (1) a valuation technique that uses the quoted market price of an identical liability or similar liabilities when traded as assets; or (2) another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles set forth by the FASB for measuring fair value, such as a present value technique. The guidance is effective for the Predecessor Companies on October 1, 2009, and its adoption will not impact the Predecessor Companies’ combined financial statements.
In September 2009, the FASB issued additional guidance on how to determine fair value for investments in certain entities that calculate net asset value per share. The guidance permits, as a practical expedient, to estimate the fair value of the investment using its reported net asset value per share as long as that value was calculated in accordance with the authoritative literature governing investment companies. The guidance is effective for the Predecessor Companies on October 1, 2009, and its adoption will not impact the Predecessor Companies’ combined financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB amended the Fair Value Measurements Topic of the ASC to require additional disclosures on 1) transfers between levels, 2) Level 3 activity presented on a gross basis, 3) valuation techniques, and 4) inputs into the valuation. Except for Item 2 above, the additional disclosures will be required in the first quarter of 2010 for the Predecessor Companies. The disclosures in Item 2 will be required in the first quarter of 2011 for the Predecessor Companies. The Predecessor Companies are currently evaluating the impact of this guidance on its combined financial statements.
Multi-Deliverable Arrangements
In October 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which impacts the recognition of revenue in multi-deliverable arrangements. The guidance establishes a selling-price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable. The goal of this guidance is to clarify disclosures related to multi-deliverable arrangements and to align the accounting with the underlying economics of the multi-deliverable transaction. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The Predecessor Companies are in the process of evaluating this guidance but do not believe this guidance will have a material impact on the Predecessor Companies combined financial condition or results of operations.
11
THE PREDECESSOR COMPANIES OF SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Accounting for Uncertain Tax Positions
In 2006, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which provides detailed guidance for the financial statement recognition, measurement and disclosure of uncertain tax positions recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements. The guidance requires an entity to recognize the financial statement impact of a tax position when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination. On December 30, 2008, the FASB issued additional guidance which deferred the effective implementation date the guidance to the Predecessor Companies’ annual financial statements ending on December 31, 2009 and the Predecessor Companies have elected to defer application of the guidance until then. The Predecessor Companies do not expect that the adoption of the guidance will have a material effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Non-controlling Interests
In December 2007, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. The guidance clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary, which is sometimes referred to as unconsolidated investment, is an ownership in the consolidated entity that should be reported as a component of equity in the consolidated financial statements. Among other requirements, the guidance requires consolidated net income to be reported at amounts that include the amounts attributable to both the parent and the non-controlling interest. It also requires disclosure, on the face of the consolidated income statement, of the amounts of the consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest. The provisions of the guidance are effective for the Predecessor Companies on January 1, 2009. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material impact on the Predecessor Companies’ combined financial statements.
During the Predecessor Companies’ examination of the guidance and its impact on the Predecessor Companies’ current accounting, they determined that balances historically designated as “non-controlling interest” in the Predecessor Companies’ combined preneed cemetery trusts and cemetery perpetual care trusts do not meet the criteria for non-controlling interest as prescribed by the guidance. The guidance indicates that only a financial instrument classified as equity in the trusts’ financial statements can be a non-controlling interest in the combined financial statements. The interest related to the Predecessor Companies’ merchandise and service trusts is classified as a liability because the preneed contracts underlying these trusts are unconditionally redeemable upon the occurrence of an event that is certain to occur. Since the earnings from the Predecessor Companies’ cemetery perpetual care trusts are used to support the maintenance of cemeteries, the Predecessor Companies believe the interest in these trusts also retains the characteristics of a liability. Accordingly, effective December 31, 2008, the amounts historically described as “Non-controlling interest in cemetery trusts” are characterized as “Deferred preneed cemetery receipts held in trust”. The amounts historically described as “Non-controlling interest in cemetery perpetual care trusts” are characterized as “Care trusts’ corpus”.
3. Preneed Cemetery Activities
Preneed Cemetery Receivables and Trust Investments
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments represent trust investments, including investment earnings, and customer receivables, net of unearned finance charges, for contracts sold in advance of when the property interment rights, merchandise or services are needed. The cemetery merchandise and service trusts are variable interest entities as defined in the Consolidation Topic of the ASC. In accordance with this guidance, the Predecessor Companies have determined that they are the primary beneficiary of these trusts, because they absorb the majority of the losses and returns associated with these trusts, and when customer payments are received, the amount required by law is deposited into the trust and the corresponding amount is reclassified fromDeferred preneed cemetery revenues intoDeferred preneed cemetery revenues held in trust.Amounts are withdrawn from the trusts when the contract obligations are performed. The Predecessor Companies, as allocated from SCI’s deposits and withdrawals based on the gross fair value of the Predecessor Companies’ portion of trust investments compared to the total trust investments, deposited $5.4 million and $2.9 million into and withdrew $5.6 million and $2.7 million from the trusts during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Cash flows from preneed cemetery contracts are presented as operating cash flows in the consolidated statements of cash flows.
12
THE PREDECESSOR COMPANIES OF SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The components ofPreneed cemetery receivables and trust investmentsin the combined balance sheets at December 31, 2008 and 2007 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2008 | | | December 31, 2007 | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Trust investments, at market | | $ | 31,350 | | | $ | 54,472 | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | 7,041 | | | | 4,464 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Trust investments | | | 38,391 | | | | 58,936 | |
Receivables from customers | | | 3,122 | | | | 4,171 | |
Unearned finance charges | | | (424 | ) | | | (486 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | 41,089 | | | | 62,621 | |
Allowance for cancellation | | | (86 | ) | | | (350 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments | | $ | 41,003 | | | $ | 62,271 | |
| | | | | | | | |
The cost and market values associated with the cemetery merchandise and service trust investments recorded at fair market value at December 31, 2008 and 2007 are detailed below. Cost reflects the investment (net of redemptions) of control holders in common trust funds, mutual funds, and private equity investments. Fair market value represents the value of the underlying securities held by the common trust funds, mutual funds at published values, and the estimated market value of private equity investments.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2008 | |
| | Cost | | Unrealized Gains | | Unrealized Losses | | | Fair Market Value | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Fixed income securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Corporate | | $ | 835 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | | $ | 835 | |
Mutual funds: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity | | | 34,600 | | | 79 | | | (12,712 | ) | | | 21,967 | |
Fixed income | | | 11,060 | | | 47 | | | (3,919 | ) | | | 7,188 | |
Private equity and other | | | 1,360 | | | — | | | — | | | | 1,360 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Trust investments | | $ | 47,855 | | $ | 126 | | $ | (16,631 | ) | | $ | 31,350 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Market value as a percentage of cost | | | | | | | | | | | | | 66 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2007 | |
| | Cost | | Unrealized Gains | | Unrealized Losses | | | Fair Market Value | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Fixed income securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Corporate | | $ | 844 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | | $ | 844 | |
Mutual funds: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity | | | 37,998 | | | 4,449 | | | (974 | ) | | | 41,473 | |
Fixed income | | | 11,611 | | | 545 | | | (1 | ) | | | 12,155 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Trust investments | | $ | 50,453 | | $ | 4,994 | | $ | (975 | ) | | | 54,472 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Market value as a percentage of cost | | | | | | | | | | | | | 108 | % |
Where quoted prices are available in an active market, securities held by the common trust funds and mutual funds are classified as Level 1 investments pursuant to the three-level valuation hierarchy as required by the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the ASC.
Where quoted market prices are not available for the specific security, fair values are estimated by using either quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics or a fair value model with observable inputs that include a combination of interest rates, yield curves, credit risks, prepayment speeds, rating, and tax-exempt status. Corporate fixed income securities represent Level 2 securities at December 31, 2008.
13
THE PREDECESSOR COMPANIES OF SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The valuation of private equity and other alternative investments requires significant management judgment due to the absence of quoted market prices, inherent lack of liquidity, and the long-term nature of such assets. The fair value of these investments is estimated based on the market value of the underlying real estate and private equity investments. The underlying real estate value is determined using the most recent available appraisals. Private equity investments are valued using market appraisals or a discounted cash flow methodology depending on the nature of the underlying assets. The appraisals assess value based on a combination of replacement cost, comparative sales analysis, and discounted cash flow analysis. These private equity and other alternative investments are classified as Level 3 securities.
The inputs into the fair value of market-based cemetery merchandise and service trust investments are categorized as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quoted Market Prices in Active Markets | | Significant Other Observable Inputs | | Significant Unobservable Inputs | | Fair Market Value |
| | (Level 1) | | (Level 2) | | (Level 3) | | |
| | (In thousands) |
Trust investments at: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2008 | | $ | 29,155 | | $ | 835 | | $ | 1,360 | | $ | 31,350 |
December 31, 2007 | | $ | 53,628 | | $ | 844 | | $ | — | | $ | 54,472 |
The change in market-based cemetery merchandise and service trust investments with significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) is as follows for the year ended December 31 (in thousands):
| | | |
Beginning balance, December 31, 2007 | | $ | — |
Purchases | | | 1,360 |
| | | |
Ending balance, December 31, 2008 | | $ | 1,360 |
| | | |
Maturity dates of the fixed income securities occur within 2009. Maturities of fixed income securities at December 31, 2008 are estimated as follows:
| | | |
| | Market |
| | (In thousands) |
Due in one year or less | | $ | 835 |
Thereafter | | | — |
| | | |
| | $ | 835 |
| | | |
The Predecessor Companies have determined that unrealized losses in the cemetery trust investments at December 31, 2008 and 2007 are considered temporary in nature, as the unrealized losses were due to temporary fluctuations in interest rates and equity prices. The Predecessor Companies believe that none of the securities are other than temporarily impaired based on an analysis of the investments as well as discussions with trustees, money managers, and consultants. The Predecessor Companies’ cemetery trust investment unrealized losses, their durations, and their fair market value as of December 31, 2008, are shown in the following table.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Less Than 12 Months | | | Greater Than 12 Months | | | Total | |
| | Fair Market Value | | Unrealized Losses | | | Fair Market Value | | Unrealized Losses | | | Fair Market Value | | Unrealized Losses | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Mutual funds: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity | | $ | 12,570 | | $ | (6,139 | ) | | $ | 8,419 | | $ | (6,573 | ) | | $ | 20,989 | | $ | (12,712 | ) |
Fixed income | | | 6,549 | | | (3,895 | ) | | | 44 | | | (24 | ) | | | 6,593 | | | (3,919 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total temporarily impaired securities | | $ | 19,119 | | $ | (10,034 | ) | | $ | 8,463 | | $ | (6,597 | ) | | $ | 27,582 | | $ | (16,631 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
14
THE PREDECESSOR COMPANIES OF SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Predecessor Companies’ cemetery trust investment unrealized losses, their durations, and their fair market value as of December 31, 2007, are shown in the following table.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Less Than 12 Months | | | Greater Than 12 Months | | | Total | |
| | Fair Market Value | | Unrealized Losses | | | Fair Market Value | | Unrealized Losses | | | Fair Market Value | | Unrealized Losses | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Mutual funds: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity | | $ | 15,184 | | $ | (889 | ) | | $ | 350 | | $ | (85 | ) | | $ | 15,534 | | $ | (974 | ) |
Fixed income | | | 73 | | | (1 | ) | | | — | | | — | | | | 73 | | | (1 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total temporarily impaired securities | | $ | 15,257 | | $ | (890 | ) | | $ | 350 | | $ | (85 | ) | | $ | 15,607 | | $ | (975 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
During the year ended December 31, 2008, purchases and sales of available-for-sale securities included in trust investments, as allocated from SCI’s purchases and sales based on the gross fair value of the Predecessor Companies’ portion of trust investments compared to the total trust investments, were $8.8 million and $11.3 million, respectively. These sale transactions resulted in $.02 million and $3.1 million of realized gains and realized losses, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2008. During the year ended December 31, 2007, purchases and sales of available-for-sale securities included in trust investments, as allocated from SCI’s purchases and sales based on the gross fair value of the Predecessor Companies’ portion of trust investments compared to the total trust investments, were $27.6 million and $26.5 million, respectively. These sale transactions resulted in $6.0 million and $6.1 million of realized gains and realized losses, respectively for year ended December 31, 2007. The Predecessor Companies use the FIFO method to determine the cost of cemetery trust available-for-sale securities sold during the period.
Earnings from all trust investments are recognized in current cemetery revenues when the service is performed or the merchandise is delivered or upon cancellation of the amount the Predecessor Companies are entitled to retain. Recognized earnings (realized and unrealized) related to these trust investments were $0.7 million, $0.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Deferred Preneed Cemetery Revenues
At December 31, 2008 and 2007,Deferred preneed cemetery revenues, net of allowance for cancellation, represent future cemetery revenues, including distributed trust investment earnings associated with unperformed trust funded preneed cemetery contracts that are not held in trust accounts.Deferred preneed cemetery revenuesare recognized in current cemetery revenues when the service is performed or merchandise delivered. Future cemetery revenues and net trust investment earnings that are held in trust accounts are included inDeferred preneed cemetery receipts held in trust.
4. Cemetery Perpetual Care Trusts
The Predecessor Companies are required by state law to pay into perpetual care trusts a portion of the proceeds from the sale of cemetery property interment rights. As the primary beneficiary of the trusts, the Predecessor Companies consolidate the perpetual care trust investments with a corresponding amount recorded asCare trusts’ corpus.The Predecessor Companies, as allocated from SCI’s deposits and withdrawals based on the gross fair value of the Predecessor Companies’ portion of trust investments compared to the total trust investments, deposited $1.1 million and $0.1 million into trusts and withdrew $0.6 million and $0.6 million from trusts during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Cash flows from cemetery perpetual care contracts are presented as operating cash flows in the combined statements of cash flows.
15
THE PREDECESSOR COMPANIES OF SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The components ofCemetery Perpetual Care Funds Investments in the Predecessor Companies’ combined balance sheets at December 31 were as follows:
| | | | | | |
| | 2008 | | 2007 |
| | (In thousands) |
Trust investments, at market | | $ | 11,754 | | $ | 15,467 |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | 1,396 | | | 813 |
| | | | | | |
Trust investments | | $ | 13,150 | | $ | 16,280 |
| | | | | | |
The cost and market values associated with the cemetery perpetual care trust investments recorded at fair market value at December 31, 2008 and 2007 are detailed below. Cost reflects the investment (net of redemptions) of control holders in common trust funds, mutual funds, and private equity investments. Fair market value represents the value of the underlying securities or cash held by the common trust funds, mutual funds at published values, and the estimated market value of private equity investments.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2008 | |
| | Cost | | Unrealized Gains | | Unrealized Losses | | | Fair Market Value | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Fixed income securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Corporate | | $ | 905 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | | $ | 905 | |
Mutual funds: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity | | | 3,208 | | | — | | | (1,327 | ) | | | 1,881 | |
Fixed income | | | 10,625 | | | 1 | | | (1,968 | ) | | | 8,658 | |
Private equity and other | | | 310 | | | — | | | — | | | | 310 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Perpetual care trust investments | | $ | 15,048 | | $ | 1 | | $ | (3,295 | ) | | $ | 11,754 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Market value as a percentage of cost | | | | | | | | | | | | | 78 | % |
| |
| | December 31, 2007 | |
| | Cost | | Unrealized Gains | | Unrealized Losses | | | Fair Market Value | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Fixed income securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Corporate | | $ | 951 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | | $ | 951 | |
Mutual funds: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity | | | 3,304 | | | 63 | | | (36 | ) | | | 3,331 | |
Fixed income | | | 11,047 | | | 139 | | | (1 | ) | | | 11,185 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Perpetual care trust investments | | $ | 15,302 | | $ | 202 | | $ | (37 | ) | | $ | 15,467 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Market value as a percentage of cost | | | | | | | | | | | | | 101 | % |
Where quoted prices are available in an active market, securities held by the common trust funds and mutual funds are classified as Level 1 investments pursuant to the three-level valuation hierarchy as required by the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the ASC.
Where quoted market prices are not available for the specific security, fair values are estimated by using either quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics or a fair value model with observable inputs that include a combination of interest rates, yield curves, credit risks, prepayment speeds, rating, and tax-exempt status. Corporate fixed income securities represent level 2 securities at December 31, 2008.
The valuation of private equity and other alternative investments requires significant management judgment due to the absence of quoted market prices, inherent lack of liquidity, and the long-term nature of such assets. The fair value of these investments is estimated based on the market value of the underlying real estate and private equity investments. The underlying real estate value is determined using the most recent available appraisals. Private equity investments are valued using market appraisals or a discounted cash flow methodology depending on the nature of the underlying assets. The appraisals assess value based on a combination of replacement cost, comparative sales analysis, and discounted cash flow analysis. These private equity and other alternative investments are classified as Level 3 securities.
16
THE PREDECESSOR COMPANIES OF SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The inputs into the fair value of market-based cemetery perpetual care investments are categorized as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quoted Market Prices in Active Markets | | Significant Other Observable Inputs | | Significant Unobservable Inputs | | Fair Market Value |
| | (Level 1) | | (Level 2) | | (Level 3) | | |
| | | | (In thousands) | | |
Trust investments at: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2008 | | $ | 10,539 | | $ | 905 | | $ | 310 | | $ | 11,754 |
December 31, 2007 | | $ | 14,516 | | $ | 951 | | $ | — | | $ | 15,467 |
The change in market-based cemetery perpetual care trust investments with significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) is as follows for the year ended December 31 (in thousands):
| | | |
Beginning balance, December 31, 2007 | | $ | — |
Purchases | | | 310 |
| | | |
Ending balance, December 31, 2008 | | $ | 310 |
| | | |
Maturity dates of the fixed income securities occur within 2009. Maturities of fixed income securities at December 31, 2008 are estimated as follows:
| | | |
| | Market |
| | (In thousands) |
Due in one year or less | | $ | 905 |
Thereafter | | | — |
| | | |
| | $ | 905 |
| | | |
The Predecessor Companies have determined that unrealized losses in the perpetual care trust investments are considered temporary in nature, as the unrealized losses were due to temporary fluctuations in interest rates and equity prices. The Predecessor Companies believe that none of the securities are other than temporarily impaired based on an analysis of the investments as well as discussions with trustees, money managers, and consultants. The Predecessor Companies’ perpetual care trust investment unrealized losses, their durations, and fair market values as of December 31, 2008, are shown in the following table.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Less Than 12 Months | | | Greater Than 12 Months | | | Total | |
| | Fair Market Value | | Unrealized Losses | | | Fair Market Value | | Unrealized Losses | | | Fair Market Value | | Unrealized Losses | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Mutual funds: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity | | $ | 1,477 | | $ | (989 | ) | | $ | 404 | | $ | (338 | ) | | $ | 1,881 | | $ | (1,327 | ) |
Fixed income | | | 8,608 | | | (1,948 | ) | | | 50 | | | (20 | ) | | | 8,658 | | | (1,968 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total temporarily impaired securities | | $ | 10,085 | | $ | (2,937 | ) | | $ | 454 | | $ | (358 | ) | | $ | 10,539 | | $ | (3,295 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Predecessor Companies’ perpetual care trust investment unrealized losses, their durations, and fair market values as of December 31, 2007, are shown in the following table.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Less Than 12 Months | | | Greater Than 12 Months | | Total | |
| | Fair Market Value | | Unrealized Losses | | | Fair Market Value | | Unrealized Losses | | Fair Market Value | | Unrealized Losses | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Mutual funds: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity | | $ | 724 | | $ | (36 | ) | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 724 | | $ | (36 | ) |
Fixed income | | | 54 | | | (1 | ) | | | 18 | | | — | | | 72 | | | (1 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total temporarily impaired securities | | $ | 778 | | $ | (37 | ) | | $ | 18 | | $ | — | | $ | 796 | | $ | (37 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
17
THE PREDECESSOR COMPANIES OF SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
During the year ended December 31, 2008, purchases and sales of available-for-sale securities in the perpetual care trusts, as allocated from SCI’s purchases and sales based on the gross fair value of the Predecessor Companies’ portion of trust investments compared to the total trust investments, were $2.3 million and $2.0 million, respectively. These sale transactions resulted in $0 and $.001 million of realized gains and realized losses, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2007, purchases and sales of available-for-sale securities in the perpetual care trusts, as allocated from SCI’s purchases and sales based on the gross fair value of the Predecessor Companies’ portion of trust investments compared to the total trust investments, were $3.6 million and $3.6 million, respectively. These sales transactions resulted in $0.8 million and $0.04 million of realized gains and realized losses, respectively.
Distributable earnings from these perpetual care trust investments are recognized in current cemetery revenues to the extent of qualifying cemetery maintenance costs. Recognized earnings related to these perpetual care trust investments were $0.6 million and $0.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 respectively.
5. Deferred Preneed Cemetery Receipts Held in Trust and Care Trusts’ Corpus
Deferred Preneed Cemetery Receipts Held in Trust
The Predecessor Companies consolidate in their balance sheet the merchandise and service trusts associated with their preneed funeral and cemetery activities in accordance with the Consolidation Topic of the ASC. Although the guidance requires the consolidation of the merchandise and service trusts, it does not change the legal relationships among the trusts, the Predecessor Companies or their customers. The customers are the legal beneficiaries of these merchandise and service trusts, and therefore, their interests in these trusts represent a non-controlling interest in subsidiaries.
Care Trusts’ Corpus
TheCare trusts’ corpus reflected in the combined balance sheet represents the cemetery perpetual care trusts, net of the accrued expenses and other long-term liabilities of the perpetual care trusts.
The components ofDeferred preneed cemetery receipts held in trust and Care trusts’ corpusin the combined balance sheet at December 31, 2008 and 2007 are detailed below.
| | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2008 |
| | Preneed Cemetery | | Cemetery Perpetual Care |
| | (In thousands) |
Trust investments | | $ | 38,391 | | $ | 13,150 |
| | | | | | |
| |
| | December 31, 2007 |
| | Preneed Cemetery | | Cemetery Perpetual Care |
| | (In thousands) |
Trust investments | | $ | 58,936 | | $ | 16,280 |
| | | | | | |
18
THE PREDECESSOR COMPANIES OF SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
6. Income Taxes
The provision or benefit for income taxes includes U.S. federal income taxes and state and local income taxes, determined on a hypothetical basis as if the Predecessor Companies constituted ‘stand-alone’ taxpayer. Certain amounts historically recorded at levels above the Predecessor Companies were allocated to properly reflect income taxes attributable to the Predecessor Companies.
Income tax provision (benefit) consisted of the following:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended December 31, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Current: | | | | | | | | |
State and local | | $ | 46 | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Deferred: | | | | | | | | |
United States | | | (4,693 | ) | | | (881 | ) |
State and local | | | 565 | | | | 66 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | (4,128 | ) | | | (815 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | (4,082 | ) | | $ | (815 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
The Predecessor Companies made income tax payments of approximately $46 thousand and $0 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The differences between the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate and the Predecessor Companies’ effective tax rate were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended December 31, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Computed tax benefit provision at the applicable federal statutory income tax rate | | $ | (4,482 | ) | | $ | (860 | ) |
State and local taxes, net of federal income tax benefits | | | 398 | | | | 43 | |
Other | | | 2 | | | | 2 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Benefit for income taxes | | $ | (4,082 | ) | | $ | (815 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Total effective tax rate | | | 31.9 | % | | | 33.2 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Deferred taxes are determined based on differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted marginal tax rates. The tax effects of temporary differences and carry-forwards that give rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31 consisted of the following:
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Inventories and cemetery property, principally due to purchase accounting adjustments | | $ | (11,148 | ) | | $ | (11,161 | ) |
Property and equipment, principally due to differences in depreciation methods and purchase accounting adjustments | | | — | | | | (230 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Deferred tax liabilities | | | (11,148 | ) | | | (11,391 | ) |
Deferred revenue on preneed funeral and cemetery contracts, principally due to earnings from trust funds | | | 89 | | | | 57 | |
Property and equipment, principally due to differences in depreciation methods and purchase accounting adjustments | | | 3,525 | | | | — | |
Intangibles, principally due to amortization methods | | | 836 | | | | 548 | |
Receivables, principally due to sales of cemetery interment rights and related products | | | 2,258 | | | | 2,737 | |
Loss and tax credit carry-forwards | | | 9,647 | | | | 8,024 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Deferred tax assets | | | 16,355 | | | | 11,366 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Valuation allowance | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net deferred income taxes | | $ | 5,207 | | | $ | (25 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
19
THE PREDECESSOR COMPANIES OF SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Deferred tax assetsandDeferred income tax liabilitiesconsisted of the following as of December 31:
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
Non-current deferred tax assets | | $ | 5,585 | | | $ | 495 | |
Current deferred tax liabilities | | | (378 | ) | | | (520 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net deferred tax asset (liability) | | $ | 5,207 | | | $ | (25 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Predecessor Companies have federal tax loss carry-forwards of $9.4 million and $8.0 million respectively with an expiration date of 2028 and 2027. As of December 31, 2008 the Predecessor Companies have state loss carry-forwards of $233 thousand with an expiration date of 2028.
As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Predecessor Companies did not establish a valuation allowance for deferred taxes. It is management’s belief that federal tax loss carry-forwards will be utilized fully by the Parent company.
7. Leases
As of December 31, 2008, the Predecessor Companies entered into an income lease relating to the warehouse storage. Future income relating to the lease is as follows:
| | | |
2009 | | $ | 37 |
2010 | | | 46 |
2011 | | | 47 |
2012 | | | 8 |
| | | |
Total | | $ | 138 |
| | | |
8. Commitments and Contingencies
Operating and Capital Leases
The Predecessor Companies’ leases relate to transportation equipment and storage rental. Rental expense for operating leases was $17 thousand and $25 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. As of December 31, 2008, future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable operating leases were immaterial and future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable capital leases exceeding one year were as follows:
| | | | |
| | Capital | |
| | (In thousands) | |
2009 | | $ | 14 | |
2010 | | | 4 | |
| | | | |
Total | | | 18 | |
Less: Interest on capital leases | | | (1 | ) |
| | | | |
Total principal payable on capital leases | | | 17 | |
Less current portion | | | (13 | ) |
| | | | |
| | $ | 4 | |
| | | | |
Litigation
The Predecessor Companies are parties to various litigation matters, investigations, and proceedings in the ordinary course of business. Management of the Predecessor Companies does not expect the outcome of any proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, to have a materially adverse effect on the Predecessor Companies’ financial position, results of operations, or liquidity.
20
THE PREDECESSOR COMPANIES OF SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
9. Supplementary Information
The detail of certain balance sheet accounts is as follows:
| | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2008 | | 2007 |
| | (In thousands) |
Cemetery property: | | | | | | |
Undeveloped land | | $ | 2,104 | | $ | 6,005 |
Developed land, lawn crypts, and mausoleums | | | 729 | | | 9,585 |
| | | | | | |
| | $ | 2,833 | | $ | 15,590 |
| | | | | | |
Deferred charges and other assets: | | | | | | |
Deferred merchandise and service costs | | $ | 2,745 | | $ | 2,859 |
Other | | | 172 | | | 51 |
| | | | | | |
| | $ | 2,917 | | $ | 2,910 |
| | | | | | |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities: | | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 751 | | $ | 365 |
Accrued compensation | | | 55 | | | 68 |
Other accrued liabilities | | | 15 | | | 18 |
| | | | | | |
| | $ | 821 | | $ | 451 |
| | | | | | |
21