Pinnacle Foods 10-Q 2005 Q4 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended
June 26, 2005 Commission File Number
333-118390

Pinnacle Foods Group Inc.

Delaware
State of Incorporation 94-3303521
I.R.S. Employer Identification No.

6 Executive Campus, Suite 100
Cherry Hill, New Jersey 08002
Principal Executive Offices

Telephone Number: (856) 969-7100

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yesþ Noo.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b - - 2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).

Yeso Noþ.

As of August 9, 2005, there were outstanding 100 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Registrant.

1

TABLE OF CONTENTS
FORM 10-Q

	Page
	No.
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION		3
ITEM 1:CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION		3
Consolidated Statements of Operations		4
Consolidated Balance Sheets		5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows		6
Consolidated Statements of Shareholder’s Equity		7
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		8
1. Summary of Business Activities		8
2. Interim Financial Statements		8
3. Acquisitions		8
4. Restructuring and Impairment Charges		11
5. Stock Options		14
6. Other Expense (Income), net		14
7. Inventories		15
8. Goodwill and Other Assets		15
9. Debt and Interest Expense		16
10. Pension and Retirement Plans		19
11. Financial Instruments		20
12. Commitments and Contingencies		22
13. Related Party Transactions		25
14. Segments		26
15. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements		27
16. Guarantor and Nonguarantor Statements		28
ITEM 2:MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS		37
Overview		37
Results of operations		41
Liquidity and capital resources		46
Inflation		50
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements		50
ITEM 3:QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK		51
ITEM 4:CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES		53
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION		54
ITEM 1:LEGAL PROCEEDINGS		54
ITEM 2:CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS		57
ITEM 3:DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES		57
ITEM 4:SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS		57
ITEM 5:OTHER INFORMATION		57
ITEM 6:EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K		57
EX-31.1: CERTIFICATION
EX-31.2: CERTIFICATION
EX-32.1: CERTIFICATION
EX-32.2: CERTIFICATION

2

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1: CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Consolidated financial statements begin on the following page

3

PINNACLE FOODS GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (unaudited)
(in thousands)

	Successor
	Three months ended						Six months ended
	June 26,			June 27,			June 26,			June 27,
	2005			2004			2005			2004
Net sales	$	306,614		$	284,240		$	614,451		$	433,712
Costs and expenses
Cost of products sold		246,220			238,977			507,987			376,699
Marketing and selling expenses		22,011			23,505			52,962			41,691
Administrative expenses		10,097			14,056			22,466			24,516
Research and development expenses		926			1,067			1,966			1,780
Other expense (income), net		1,498			986			4,924			19,922
Total costs and expenses		280,752			278,591			590,305			464,608
Income (loss) before interest and taxes		25,862			5,649			24,146			(30,896	)
Interest expense		20,882			8,306			35,135			17,898
Interest income		167			123			223			176
Income (loss) before income taxes		5,147			(2,534	)		(10,766	)		(48,618	)
Provision for income taxes		7,321			6,173			13,836			108
Net loss	$	(2,174	)	$	(8,707	)	$	(24,602	)	$	(48,726	)

See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

4

PINNACLE FOODS GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (unaudited)
(in thousands)

	Successor
	June 26,			December 26,
	2005			2004
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	13,225		$	2,235
Accounts receivable, net		75,802			74,365
Inventories, net		166,365			205,510
Other current assets		7,478			3,991
Deferred income taxes		22			22
Total current assets		262,892			286,123
Plant assets, net		215,664			223,740
Tradenames		780,544			780,544
Other assets, net		49,597			57,670
Goodwill		415,112			416,863
Total assets	$	1,723,809		$	1,764,940
Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term obligations	$	5,578		$	5,574
Notes payable		1,449			—
Accounts payable		61,736			87,921
Accrued trade marketing expense		36,754			46,014
Accrued liabilities		84,918			77,735
Accrued income taxes		2,310			1,477
Total current liabilities		192,745			218,721
Long-term debt (includes $10,816 owed to a related party)		934,458			937,506
Postretirement benefits		2,816			2,940
Deferred income taxes		224,863			212,406
Total liabilities		1,354,882			1,371,573
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)
Shareholder’s equity:
Pinnacle Common stock: Par value $.01 per share, 100 shares authorized, issued 100		—			—
Additional paid-in-capital		519,433			519,433
Accumulated other comprehensive income		53			48
Carryover of Predecessor basis of net assets		(17,338	)		(17,495	)
Accumulated deficit		(133,221	)		(108,619	)
Total shareholder’s equity		368,927			393,367
Total liabilities and shareholder’s equity	$	1,723,809		$	1,764,940

See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

5

PINNACLE FOODS GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)
(in thousands)

	Successor
	Six months ended
	June 26,			June 27,
	2005			2004
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss from operations	$	(24,602	)	$	(48,726	)
Non-cash charges (credits) to net earnings
Depreciation and amortization		21,329			18,392
Restructuring and impairment charge		1,502			10,025
Amortization of debt acquisition costs		2,614			1,907
Amortization of bond premium		(257	)		(276	)
Change in value of financial instruments		(1,261	)		(3,290	)
Equity related compensation charge		—			7,400
Postretirement healthcare benefits		(124	)		(261	)
Pension expense		298			597
Deferred income taxes		12,457			(278	)
Changes in working capital
Accounts receivable		(1,437	)		9,244
Inventories		39,145			26,069
Accrued trade marketing expense		(9,260	)		737
Accounts payable		(25,847	)		18,994
Other current assets and liabilities		8,226			(16,690	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		22,783			23,844
Cash flows from investing activities
Capital expenditures		(12,269	)		(7,375	)
Pinnacle merger consideration		1,595			(738	)
Aurora merger consideration		—			(663,759	)
Aurora merger costs		—			(13,174	)
Sale of plant assets		561			—
Net cash used in investing activities		(10,113	)		(685,046	)
Cash flows from financing activities
Change in bank overdrafts		(308	)		12,683
Repayment of capital lease obligations		(62	)		(16	)
Equity contribution to Successor		—			95,276
Successor’s debt acquisition costs		(34	)		(16,691	)
Proceeds from Successor’s bond offerings		—			200,976
Proceeds from Successor’s bank term loan		—			425,000
Proceeds from Successor’s notes payable borrowings		31,626			—
Repayments of Successor’s notes payable		(30,177	)		(14,000	)
Repayments of Successor’s long term obligations		(2,725	)		—
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(1,680	)		703,228
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		—			—
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		10,990			42,026
Cash and cash equivalents — beginning of period		2,235			5,254
Cash and cash equivalents — end of period	$	13,225		$	47,280
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Interest paid	$	30,184		$	22,233
Interest received		223			176
Income taxes refunded (paid)		438			(22	)

See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

6

PINNACLE FOODS GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY (unaudited)
(in thousands)

										Carryover of
					Additional					Predecessor			Other			Total
	Common Stock				Paid In		Accumulated			Basis of			Comprehensive			Shareholder's
	Shares		Amount		Capital		Deficit			Net Assets			Income			Equity
Successor
Balance at December 28, 2003		100	$	—	$	191,637	$	(16,299	)	$	(17,495	)	$	—		$	157,843
Equity contributions:
Cash						95,276											95,276
Noncash						225,120											225,120
Equity related compensation						7,400											7,400
Comprehensive income:
Net loss								(48,726	)								(48,726	)
Foreign currency translation														(27	)		(27	)
Total comprehensive loss																	(48,753	)
Balance at June 27, 2004		100	$	—	$	519,433	$	(65,025	)	$	(17,495	)	$	(27	)	$	436,886
Successor
Balance at December 26, 2004		100	$	—	$	519,433	$	(108,619	)	$	(17,495	)	$	48		$	393,367
Impact of additional purchase accounting adjustments											157						157
Comprehensive income:
Net loss								(24,602	)								(24,602	)
Foreign currency translation														5			5
Total comprehensive loss																	(24,597	)
Balance at June 26, 2005		100	$	—	$	519,433	$	(133,221	)	$	(17,338	)	$	53		$	368,927

See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

7

PINNACLE FOODS GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(in thousands, except where noted in millions)

1. Summary of Business Activities

Business Overview

Pinnacle Foods Group Inc. (hereafter referred to as the “Company” or “PFGI”) is a leading producer, marketer and distributor of high quality, branded food products. The ultimate parent of PFGI is Crunch Equity Holding, LLC (“LLC”).

In December 2004, the Company’s board of directors approved a change in PFGI’s fiscal year end from July 31 to the last Sunday in December. Accordingly, the Company is presenting unaudited consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 26, 2005 and for the three and six months ended June 27, 2004. Additionally, references to the “transition year” refer to the 21 weeks ended December 26, 2004.

The Company is a leading producer, marketer and distributor of high quality, branded convenience food products, the products and operations of which are managed and reported in two operating segments: (i) frozen foods and (ii) dry foods. The Company’s frozen foods segment consists primarily of Swanson and Hungry Man frozen foods products, Van de Kamp’s and Mrs. Paul’s frozen seafood, Aunt Jemima frozen breakfasts, Lender’s bagels and other frozen foods under the Celeste and Chef’s Choice names, as well as food service and private label products. The Company’s dry foods segment consists primarily of Vlasic pickles, peppers and relish products, Duncan Hines baking mixes and frostings, Mrs. Butterworth’s and Log Cabin syrups and pancake mixes, and Open Pit barbecue sauce as well as food service and private label products.

2. Interim Financial Statements

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair statement of PFGI’s financial position as of June 26, 2005, and the results of operations and cash flows for the three and six months ended June 26, 2005 and June 27, 2004. The results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in the company’s annual report filed on Form 10-K for the transition year ended December 26, 2004.

3. Acquisitions

Aurora Transaction

On November 25, 2003, Aurora Foods Inc. (“Aurora”) entered into a definitive agreement with LLC, the indirect owner of PFHC. The definitive agreement provides for a comprehensive restructuring transaction in which PFHC was merged with and into Aurora, with Aurora surviving the Merger, following the filing and confirmation of a pre-negotiated bankruptcy reorganization case with respect to Aurora under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. On December 8, 2003, Aurora filed its petition for reorganization with the Bankruptcy Court. On February 20, 2004, the First Amended Joint Reorganization Plan of Aurora Foods Inc. and Sea Coast Foods, Inc., as modified, dated February 17, 2004, was confirmed by order of the Bankruptcy Court. We collectively refer to the restructuring, the financing therefore and the other related transactions as the “Aurora Transaction.” This restructuring transaction was completed on March 19, 2004 and the surviving company was renamed Pinnacle Foods Group Inc. (hereafter referred to as the “Company” or “PFGI”).

8

PINNACLE FOODS GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(in thousands, except where noted in millions)

Pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreement, (i) the senior secured lenders under Aurora’s existing credit facility were paid in full in cash in respect of principal and interest, and received $15 million in cash in respect of certain leverage and asset sales fees owing under that facility, (ii) the holders of Aurora’s 12% senior unsecured notes due 2005 were paid in full in cash in respect of principal and interest but did not receive $1.9 million of original issue discount, (iii) the holders of Aurora’s outstanding 8.75% and 9.875% senior subordinated notes due 2008 and 2007, respectively, received approximately 50% of the face value of the senior subordinated notes plus accrued interest in cash or, at the election of each bondholder, 52% of the face value of the senior subordinated notes plus accrued interest in equity interests in LLC (held indirectly through a bondholders trust), (iv) the existing common and preferred stockholders did not receive any distributions and their shares have been cancelled, (v) Aurora’s existing accounts receivable securitization facility was terminated in December 2003, (vi) all of Aurora’s trade creditors were paid in full and (vii) all other claims against Aurora were unimpaired, except for the rejection of Aurora’s St. Louis headquarters leases. The definitive agreement also provides that total acquisition consideration is subject to a post-closing adjustment based on Aurora’s adjusted net debt as of the closing date. At this point, we can not estimate when the post-closing adjustment will be finalized. Upon the settlement of the post-closing adjustment, the merger consideration will either increase or decrease with a corresponding increase or decrease to goodwill.

In connection with the Aurora Transaction, certain ownership units of LLC were issued to CDM, which is controlled by certain members of PFGI’s management. Certain of these units provide a profits interest consisting of an interest in distributions to the extent in excess of capital contributed by members of the LLC. The interests vest immediately. The fair value of the interests at the date of grant is $7.4 million and has been included in the Successor’s Consolidated Balance Sheet as an increase in Successor’s paid-in-capital and in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the six months ended June 27, 2004 as an expense reflecting the charge for the fair value immediately after consummation of the Aurora Transaction. Additional units were issued in connection with the Pinnacle Merger.

After the consummation of the Aurora Transaction, JPMP and JWC collectively own approximately 48% of LLC, the holders of Aurora’s senior subordinated notes own approximately 43% of LLC and CDM owns approximately 9% of LLC, in each case subject to dilution by up to 16% in management equity incentives and in each case without giving effect to any net debt adjustment to the Aurora equity value.

Prior to its bankruptcy filing, Aurora entered into an agreement with its prepetition lending group compromising the amount of certain fees (i.e., excess leverage fees) due under its senior bank facilities (the “October Amendment”). One of the members of the bank group (R2 Top Hat, Ltd.) challenged the enforceability of the October Amendment during Aurora’s bankruptcy by filing an adversary proceeding and by objecting to confirmation. The bankruptcy court rejected the lender’s argument and confirmed Aurora’s plan of reorganization. The lender then appealed from those orders of the bankruptcy court. The appeals are pending. It is too early to predict the outcome of the appeals. The Company assumed a liability of $20 million through the Aurora Transaction with respect to its total exposure relating to these fees, which is included in Accrued Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

The Aurora Transaction was financed through borrowings of a $425.0 million Term Loan drawn under the Company’s Senior Secured Credit Facilities, $201.0 million gross proceeds from the February 2004 issuance of the 8.25% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013, existing cash on the Aurora balance sheet and cash equity contributions of $84.4 million and $10.9 million by the Sponsors and from the Aurora bondholders, respectively.

The total cost of the Aurora Transaction, subject to the post-closing adjustment discussed above, consists of:

Total paid to Aurora’s creditors	$	709,327
Less: Amount paid with Aurora cash		(20,764	)
Subtotal		688,563
Fair value of equity interests in LLC exchanged for Aurora senior subordinated notes		225,120
Acquisition costs		21,608
Total cost of acquisition	$	935,291

9

PINNACLE FOODS GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(in thousands, except where noted in millions)

The following table summarizes the allocation of the total cost of acquisition to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed:

Assets recorded:
Plant assets	$	107,528
Inventories		68,116
Accounts receivable		52,730
Cash		24,804
Other current assets		4,428
Goodwill		278,240
Recipes and formulas		20,600
Tradenames		675,700
Other assets		690
Fair value of assets acquired		1,232,836
Liabilities assumed		114,053
Deferred income taxes		183,492
Purchase price	$	935,291

The total intangible assets amounted to $974,540, of which $20,600 was assigned to recipes and formulas, which are amortized over an estimated useful life of five years, and $675,700 was assigned to tradenames that are not subject to amortization. Goodwill, which is not subject to amortization, amounted to $278,240, of which $150,872 was allocated to the dry foods segment and $127,368 was allocated to the frozen foods segment. No new tax-deductible goodwill was created as a result of the Aurora Transaction, but historical tax-deductible goodwill in the amount of $386,386 does exist.

In accordance with the requirements of purchase method accounting for acquisitions, inventories as of March 19, 2004 were valued at fair value (net realizable value, which is defined as estimated selling prices less the sum of (a) costs of disposal and (b) a reasonable profit allowance for the selling effort of the acquiring entity) which in the case of finished products was $13,185 higher than the Aurora’s historical manufacturing cost. Cost of products sold in the six months ended June 27, 2004 includes a pre-tax charge of $12,966 representing the write-up of the inventory to fair value at March 19, 2004 of inventories.

Pro forma Information

The following schedule includes statements of operation data for the unaudited actual results for the six months ended June 26, 2005 and unaudited pro forma information for the six months ended June 27, 2004 as if the Aurora Transaction had occurred as of December 29, 2003. The pro forma information includes the actual results with pro forma adjustments for the change in interest expense related to the changes in capital structure resulting from the financings discussed above, purchase accounting adjustments resulting in changes to depreciation and amortization expenses, and the reduction in rent expense resulting from an office closure.

The unaudited pro forma information is provided for illustrative purposes only. It does not purport to represent what the results of operations would have been had the Aurora Transaction occurred on the dates indicated above, nor does it purport to project the results of operations for any future period or as of any future date.

	Six months ended
	June 26,			June 27,
	2005			2004
	(Actual)			(Pro Forma)
Net sales	$	614,451		$	591,176
Earnings before interest and taxes	$	24,146		$	175,128
Net (loss) earnings	$	(24,602	)	$	139,190

10

PINNACLE FOODS GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(in thousands, except where noted in millions)

Pro forma depreciation and amortization expense included above was $21,812 for the six months ended June 27, 2004.

Included in earnings (loss) before interest and taxes in the pro forma information above for the six months ended June 27, 2004 are the following material charges (credits):

	Six Months
	Ended
Pinnacle Historical Financial Statements	June 27, 2004
Flow through of fair value of inventories over manufactured cost as of November 25, 2003	$	18,126
Flow through of fair value of inventories over manufactured cost as of March 19, 2004		12,966
Aurora acquisitions costs		3,808
Pinnacle acquisition costs		1,420
Equity related compensation		7,400
Impact on earnings (loss) before interest and taxes	$	43,720

	Six Months
	Ended
Aurora Historical Financial Statements	June 27, 2004
Write off of obsolete inventory	$	725
Administrative restructuring and retention costs		548
Financial restructuring and divestiture costs		5,023
Reorganization (primarily consists of debt forgiveness)		(187,971	)
Miscellaneous non-cash charges		207
Impact on earnings (loss) before interest and taxes	$	(181,468	)

4. Restructuring and Impairment Charges

Frozen Food Segment

Erie, Pennsylvania Production Facility

On April 29, 2005, the Company’s board of directors approved a plan to permanently close its Erie, Pennsylvania production facility, as part of the Company’s plan of consolidating and streamlining production activities after the Aurora merger. Production from the Erie plant, which manufactures Mrs. Paul’s and Van de Kamp frozen seafood products and Aunt Jemima frozen breakfast products, will be relocated primarily to the Company’s Jackson, Tennessee production facility. Activities related to the closure of the plant are expected to be completed by the fourth quarter of 2005 and will result in the elimination of approximately 290 positions. Employee termination activities will commence in July 2005 and are expected to be completed in the third quarter of 2005. In accordance with SFAS 112, “Employers Accounting for Postemployment Benefits”, the Company has accrued severance costs related to the employees to be terminated. In addition, the following table contains detailed information about the charges incurred related to the Erie restructuring plan, recorded in accordance with SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities”:

	Estimated		Incurred		Estimated
	Total		Through		Remaining
Description	Charges		June 26, 2005		Charges
Employee severance	$	590	$	590	$	—
Other costs		3,650		85		3,565
Total	$	4,240	$	675	$	3,565

11

PINNACLE FOODS GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(in thousands, except where noted in millions)

The charges incurred have been included in Other expense (income), net line in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for six months ended June 26, 2005. All such charges are reported under the frozen foods business segment.

The Company plans to transfer equipment with a net book value of approximately $4 million to other production locations, primarily in Jackson, Tennessee. The remaining property, plant and equipment have been evaluated as to recoverability. Based on an estimate of future cash flows over the remaining useful life of the assets, depreciation expense will be accelerated on the remaining asset value and will result in additional depreciation expense of approximately $4,400 through July 2005, of which $4,180 has been incurred in the three months ended June 26, 2005.

Employees terminated as a result of this closure are eligible to receive severance pay and other benefits totaling $590, which was accrued at June 26, 2005. However, none of such amounts have been expended. Other closing costs of approximately $3,650 relate to facility operating costs during the shutdown period and other shutdown costs and expenses associated with dismantling, transferring and reassembling certain equipment to Jackson, Tennessee. As of June 26, 2005, $50 has been accrued and $35 has been spent.

In connection with the plant closure, facility operating and shutdown costs as well as costs to dismantle, transfer and reassemble equipment and other plant shut down costs will be incurred and expect to result in expense as incurred in the Company’s Statements of Operations of approximately $3,345 and $220 in the third and fourth quarters, respectively, of 2005. Also, the Company expects to make capital expenditures of approximately $7,100 through October 2005 in connection with this plant consolidation project.

Mattoon, Illinois Production Facility

On April 21, 2005, the Company made and announced its decision effective May 9, 2005 to shutdown a bagel production line at its Mattoon, Illinois facility, which produces the Company’s Lender’s® Bagels. In connection with the shutdown of the production line, the Company will be terminating 28 full-time and 7 part-time employees. A portion of the assets that were used in the bagel line will be utilized in other production areas within the Company. In accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment and Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”, the Company incurred a non-cash charge of $862 related to the asset impairment of the bagel line, which has been recorded as a component of Other expense (income), net in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the six months ended June 26, 2005. The Company expects that any costs associated with the removal of the assets would be offset from the proceeds received from the sale of those assets.

Omaha, Nebraska Production Facility

On April 7, 2004, the Company made and announced its decision to permanently close its Omaha, Nebraska production facility, as part of the Company’s plan of consolidating and streamlining production activities after the Aurora merger. Production from the Omaha plant, which manufactured Swanson frozen entree retail products and frozen foodservice products and ceased in December 2004, has been relocated to the Company’s Fayetteville, Arkansas and Jackson, Tennessee production facilities. Activities related to the closure of the plant were completed in the first quarter of 2005 and resulted in the elimination of 411 positions. The following table contains detailed information about the charges incurred to date related to the Omaha restructuring plan, recorded in accordance with SFAS No. 112, “Employers Accounting for Postemployment Benefits”, SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment and Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” and SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities”:

									Incurred
	Original		Change in						Through		Six Months		Estimated
	Estimated		Estimated						December 26,		Ended		Remaining
Description	Charges		Charges			Transfers			2004		June 26, 2005		Charges
Asset impairment charges	$	7,400	$	2,649					$	10,049	$	—	$	—
Employee severance		2,506		—			59			2,506		59		—
Other costs		4,984		(809	)		(59	)		3,078		1,008		30
Total	$	14,890	$	1,840		$	—		$	15,633	$	1,067	$	30

The charges incurred have been included in other expense (income), net in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

12

PINNACLE FOODS GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(in thousands, except where noted in millions)

The Company had planned to transfer equipment with a net book value of approximately $9,700 to other production locations, primarily in Fayetteville, Arkansas and Jackson, Tennessee. Due to the delay in closing the Omaha plant and the need to have production up and running in the Fayetteville plant, the Company was unable to transfer certain equipment with a net book value of $6,196 and instead incurred capital expenditures to purchase, build and modify the necessary equipment in Fayetteville. In addition to the impairment charge initially recorded in the first quarter of 2004, the Company evaluated the remaining property, plant and equipment as well as existing offers to sell the plant and equipment, and recorded an additional impairment charge of $2,649 in December 2004.

Employees terminated as a result of this closure are eligible to receive severance pay and benefits totaling $2,565, of which $2,516 has been disbursed as of June 26, 2005. Other closing costs of approximately $4,116 relate to other shutdown costs. As of June 26, 2005, $3,862 has been disbursed and $224 has been incurred and accrued.

The employee terminations resulted in a curtailment gain under the Company’s pension plan of $2,067 and postretirement benefit plan of approximately $1,142, as a portion of the unrecognized prior service credit will be immediately recognized when the employees terminate. In accordance with SFAS No. 88, the curtailment gain attributable to the pension plan was completely offset by an unrecognized loss. The gain of $1,142 attributable to the postretirement benefit plan has been recognized as a component of cost of products sold in the Consolidated Statements of Operations during the 21 weeks ended December 26, 2004.

In connection with the plant closure, costs to dismantle, transfer and reassemble equipment and other plant shut down costs will be incurred and expect to result in expense as incurred in the Company’s Statements of Operations of approximately $30 in the third quarter of 2005. Also, the Company is making capital expenditures totaling approximately $7,700 through the third quarter ending June 2005 in connection with this plant consolidation project.

The following table summarizes impairment and restructuring charges during the six months ended June 26, 2005. It also includes severance liabilities assumed or established in purchase accounting. These amounts are recorded in accrued liabilities.

	Balance at													Balance at
	December 26,				Noncash			Cash						June 26,
Description	2004		Additions		Reductions			Reductions			Transfers			2005
Other asset impairment charges	$	—	$	862	$	(862	)	$	—					$	—
Employee severance		3,695		590		—			(2,274	)		59			2,070
Other costs		305		1,152		—			(1,124	)		(59	)		274
Total	$	4,000	$	2,604	$	(862	)	$	(3,398	)	$	—		$	2,344

13

PINNACLE FOODS GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(in thousands, except where noted in millions)

5. Stock Options

As permitted by SFAS No. 123 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” as amended by SFAS No. 148 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure,” the Company uses the intrinsic value-based method of accounting prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations to account for its employee stock-based compensation. No compensation expense for employee stock options is reflected in net earnings as all options granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the common stock on the date of the grant.

The following table illustrates the effect on net earnings if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 to stock-based employee compensation for the three and six months ended June 26, 2005 and June 27 2004.

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 26,			June 27,			June 26,			June 27,
	2005			2004			2005			2004
Net loss, as reported	$	(2,174	)	$	(11,441	)	$	(24,602	)	$	(51,460	)
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value method for all stock option awards, net of related tax effects		(293	)		(158	)		(569	)		(316	)
Pro forma net loss	$	(2,467	)	$	(11,599	)	$	(25,171	)	$	(51,776	)

6. Other Expense (Income), net

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 26,			June 27,			June 26,			June 27,
	2005			2004			2005			2004
Other expense (income) consists of:
Restructuring and impairment charges	$	363		$	—		$	2,604		$	10,025
Merger related costs		(101	)		—			(101	)		8,820
Amortization of intangibles/other assets		1,204			1,036			2,407			1,148
Royalty expense (income), net		21			(87	)		45			(114	)
Other		11			37			(31	)		43
Total other expense	$	1,498		$	986		$	4,924		$	19,922

Restructuring charges.As described in Note 4, the Company incurred costs in connection with the planned shutdown of the Omaha, Nebraska and Erie, Pennsylvania facilities as well as the shut down of a production line in Mattoon, Illinois.

Merger related costs.The Company incurred the following costs in the first quarter of 2004 in connection with the Pinnacle Merger and the Aurora Transaction discussed in Note 3:

Equity related compensation. In connection with the formation of LLC and the Aurora Transaction, certain ownership units of LLC were issued to CDM, which is controlled by certain members of PFGI’s management. Certain of these units provide a profits interest consisting of an interest in distributions to the extent in excess of capital contributed by members of the LLC. The interests vest immediately. The estimated fair value of the interests issued in the Aurora Transaction at the date of the respective grant was $7,400, and has been included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as an increase in the Company’s paid-in-capital and in the Consolidated Statement of Operations as an expense reflecting the charge for the fair value immediately after consummation of such transactions.

Retention benefits. In connection with the Pinnacle Merger, retention benefits to certain key employees accrued during the three and six months ended June 27, 2004 totaled $1,420.

14

PINNACLE FOODS GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(in thousands, except where noted in millions)

7. Inventories

	June 26,			December 26,
	2005			2004
Raw materials, containers and supplies	$	39,795		$	34,489
Finished product		137,317			187,645
		177,112			222,134
Reserves		(10,747	)		(16,624	)
Total	$	166,365		$	205,510

Reserves represent amounts necessary to adjust the carrying value of inventory to the lower of cost or net realizable value, including any costs to sell or dispose.

The Company has various purchase commitments for raw materials, containers, supplies and certain finished products incident to the ordinary course of business. Such commitments are not at prices in excess of current market.

8. Goodwill and Other Assets

Goodwill

			Purchase
	December 26,		Price			June 26,
	2004		Adjustment			2005
Frozen Foods	$	122,858	$	—		$	122,858
Dry Foods		294,005		(1,751	)		292,254
Total	$	416,863	$	(1,751	)	$	415,112

During the first quarter of 2005, the working capital adjustment for the Pinnacle Merger was finalized. In the initial consideration paid to the Predecessor’s shareholders, $10 million was deposited into an escrow account pending finalization of the working capital adjustment. Upon the settlement of the adjustment, which was $8.4 million, the remaining cash was returned to the Company and resulted in a net reduction to goodwill of $1,545.

Additionally, during the second quarter of 2005, the Company settled a state tax liability related to the period of ownership prior to the Pinnacle Merger. The amount of the settlement was for less then the liability accrued at the time of the change in ownership. The settlement of the liability resulted in a decrease to goodwill of $206.

Other Assets

	June 26,		December 26,
	2005		2004
Amortizable intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $5,861 and $3,454, respectively	$	15,170	$	17,577
Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $7,261 and $4,647, respectively		33,360		35,940
Interest rate swap fair value (Note 11)		473		3,533
Other		594		620
Total	$	49,597	$	57,670

15

PINNACLE FOODS GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(in thousands, except where noted in millions)

Amortizable intangible assets relate primarily to recipes and formulas acquired in the Aurora Transaction and have been assigned a five year estimated useful life for amortization purposes. Additionally, during the 21 weeks ended December 26, 2004, the Company reacquired an exclusive license to distribute Duncan Hines product in Canada. The license that was reacquired runs through June 30, 2006 at which time the Company will have exclusive right to distribution of the Duncan Hines product in Canada. Amortization expense during the three and six months ended June 26, 2005 was $1,204 and $2,407, respectively. Amortization expense during the three and six months ended June 27, 2004 was $1,036 and $1,148, respectively. Estimated amortization expense for each of the next five years is as follows: remainder of 2005 — $2,407, 2006 — $4,299, 2007 — $3,785, 2008 - $3,785, 2009 — $869, thereafter — $25.

Deferred financing costs relate to the Successor’s senior secured credit facilities and senior subordinated notes. Amortization was $1,307 and $2,614 for the three and six months ended June 26, 2005, respectively. Amortization for the three and six months ended June 27, 2004 was $1,158 and $1,907, respectively.

9. Debt and Interest Expense

	June 26,		December 26,
	2005		2004
Long-term debt
Successor
- Senior secured credit facility — term loan	$	539,550	$	542,275
- 8 1/4% Senior subordinated notes		394,000		394,000
- Plus: unamortized premium on senior subordinated notes		6,195		6,452
- Capital lease obligations		291		353
Total Debt		940,036		943,080
Less: current portion of long-term obligations		5,578		5,574
Total long-term debt	$	934,458	$	937,506

Interest expense	Three months ended					Six months ended
	June 26, 2005		June 27, 2004			June 26, 2005			June 27, 2004
Third party interest expense	$	18,272	$	15,036		$	36,422		$	24,628
Related party interest expense		65		76			153			76
Interest rate swap (gains) / losses (Note 11)		2,545		(6,806	)		(1,440	)		(6,806	)
	$	20,882	$	8,306		$	35,135		$	17,898

In November 2003, the Company entered into a $675.0 million Credit Agreement (“senior secured credit facilities”) with JPMorgan Chase Bank (a related party of JPMP) and other financial institutions as lenders, which provides for a $545.0 million seven-year term loan B facility, of which $120.0 million was made available on November 25, 2003 and $425.0 million was made available as a delayed draw term loan on the closing date of the Aurora Transaction. The term loan matures November 25, 2010. The senior secured credit facility also provides for a six-year $130.0 million revolving credit facility, of which up to $65.0 million was made available on November 25, 2003, and the remaining $65.0 million was made available on the closing date of the Aurora Transaction. The revolving credit facility expires November 25, 2009. There were no borrowings outstanding under the revolver as of June 26, 2005 and December 26, 2004.

As of June 26, 2005, $10,816 of our Senior Secured Credit Facility was due to JPMorgan Chase Bank. There was no related party debt as December 26, 2004.

16

PINNACLE FOODS GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(in thousands, except where noted in millions)

Subject to the Senior Credit Agreement Amendment, which is discussed below, our borrowings under the senior secured credit facilities bear interest at a floating rate and are maintained as base rate loans or as Eurodollar loans. Base rate loans bear interest at the base rate plus the applicable base rate margin, as defined in the senior secured credit facilities. Base rate is defined as the higher of (i) the prime rate and (ii) the Federal Reserve reported overnight funds rate plus 1/2 of 1%. Eurodollar loans bear interest at the adjusted Eurodollar rate, as described in the senior secured credit facilities, plus the applicable Eurodollar rate margin.

The applicable margins with respect to our term loan facility and our revolving credit facility will vary from time to time in accordance with the terms thereof and agreed upon pricing grids based on our leverage ratio as defined in our senior secured credit facilities. The initial applicable margin with respect to the term loan facility and the revolving credit facility is:

• In the case of base rate loans: 1.75% for the term loan and 1.75% for the revolving credit facility.

• In the case of Eurodollar loans: 2.75% for the term loan and 2.75% for the revolving credit facility.

The range of margins for the revolving credit facility is:

• In the case of base rate loans: 1.25% to 1.75%.

• In the case of Eurodollar loans: 2.25% to 2.75%.

A commitment fee of 0.50% per annum applies to the unused portion of the revolving loan facility and 1.25% per annum applied to the delayed-draw term loan until it became available for the Aurora Transaction. For the three and six months ended June 26, 2005, the weighted average interest rate on the term loan was 6.3251% and 6.0218%, respectively. For the six months ended June 26, 2005, the weighted average interest rate on the revolving credit facility was 6.2530%. There were no borrowings under the revolving credit facility during the three months ended June 26, 2005. As of June 26, 2005, the Eurodollar interest rate on the term loan facility was 6.3477% and the commitment fee on the undrawn revolving credit facility was 0.50%. For the three and six months ended June 27, 2004, the weighted average interest rate on the term loan was 4.1282% and 4.1134%, respectively. For the six months ended June 26, 2005, the weighted average interest rate on the revolving credit facility was 3.8886%. There were no borrowings under the revolving credit facility during the three months ended June 27, 2004. As of June 27, 2004, the Eurodollar interest rate on the term loan facility was 4.2591% and the commitment fee on the undrawn revolving credit facility was 0.50%.

The term loan facility matures in quarterly 0.25% installments from June 30, 2004 through December 31, 2009, with the remaining balance due in 2010 and the revolving credit facility terminates on November 25, 2009. The aggregate maturities of the term loan outstanding as of June 26, 2005 are: $2,725 in the remainder of 2005, $5,450 in 2006, $5,450 in 2007, $5,450 in 2008, $5,450 in 2009 and $515,025 thereafter.

The obligations under the senior secured credit facilities are unconditionally and irrevocably guaranteed by each of our direct or indirect domestic subsidiaries (collectively, the “Guarantors”). In addition, the senior secured credit facilities are collateralized by first priority or equivalent security interests in (i) all the capital stock of, or other equity interests in, each direct or indirect domestic subsidiary of the Company and 65% of the capital stock of, or other equity interests in, each direct foreign subsidiary of the Company, or any of its domestic subsidiaries and (ii) certain tangible and intangible assets of the Company and the Guarantors (subject to certain exceptions and qualifications).

We pay a commission on the face amount of all outstanding letters of credit drawn under the senior secured credit facilities at a per annum rate equal to the Applicable Margin then in effect with respect to Eurodollar loans under the revolving credit loan facility minus the fronting fee (as defined). A fronting fee equal to 1/4% per annum on the face amount of each letter of credit is payable quarterly in arrears to the issuing lender for its own account. We also pay a per annum fee equal to 1/2% on the undrawn portion of the commitments in respect of the revolving credit facility. Total letters of credit issuable under the facilities cannot exceed $40,000. As of June 26, 2005 and December 26, 2004, there were no outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility and we had utilized $10,477 and $15,741, respectively, for letters of credit. Of the $130,000 revolving credit facility available, as of June 26, 2005 and December 26, 2004, we had an unused balance of $119,523 and $114,259, respectively, available for future borrowings and letters of credit, of which a maximum of $29,523 and $24,259, respectively, may be used for letters of credit.

17

PINNACLE FOODS GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(in thousands, except where noted in millions)

In November 2003, the Successor issued $200.0 million 8¹/4% senior subordinated notes, which are due December 1, 2013. On February 20, 2004, the Successor issued an additional $194.0 million of 8¹/4% senior subordinated notes due December 1, 2013, which resulted in gross proceeds of $201.0 million, including premium. The terms of the February 2004 notes are the same as the November 2003 notes and are issued under the same indenture. The Notes are general unsecured obligations of the Company, subordinated in right of payment to all existing and future senior indebtedness of the Company, and guaranteed on a full, unconditional, joint and several basis by the Company’s wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries. See Note 16 for Guarantor and Nonguarantor Financial Statements.

We may redeem all or a portion of the notes prior to December 1, 2008, at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes plus a “make-whole” premium (the greater of: (1) 1% of the then outstanding principal amount of the note; and (2) the excess of: (a) the present value at such redemption date of (i) the redemption price of the note at December 1, 2008 plus (ii) all required interest payments due on the note through December 1, 2008, computed using a discount rate equal to the Treasury Rate as of such redemption date plus 50 basis points; over (b) the then outstanding principal amount of the note, if greater). On or after December 1, 2008, we may redeem some or all of the notes at the redemption prices listed below, if redeemed during the twelve-month period beginning on December 1 of the years indicated below:

Year	Percentage
2008		104.125	%
2009		102.750	%
2010		101.375	%
2011 and thereafter		100.000	%

At any time prior to December 1, 2006, we may redeem up to 35% of the original aggregate principal amount of the notes with the net cash proceeds of certain equity offerings at a redemption price equal to 108.250% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, so long as (a) at least 65% of the original aggregate amount of the notes remains outstanding after each such redemption and (b) any such redemption by us is made within 90 days of such equity offering.

If a change of control occurs (as defined in the indenture pursuant to which the notes were issued), and unless we have exercised our right to redeem all of the notes as described above, the note holders will have the right to require the Successor to repurchase all or a portion of the notes at a purchase price in cash equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase.

The notes include a provision that the Company would file with the SEC on or prior to August 21, 2004 a registration statement relating to an offer to exchange the notes for an issue of SEC-registered notes with terms identical to the notes and use its reasonable best effort to cause such registration statement to become effective on or prior to October 20, 2004. Since the exchange offer was not completed before November 19, 2004, the annual interest rate borne by the notes increased by 1.0% per annum until the exchange offer was completed, which occurred on February 1, 2005. As of this date, the Company was no longer paying the additional interest.

Our senior secured credit facilities and the notes contain a number of covenants that, among other things, limit, subject to certain exceptions, our ability to incur additional liens and indebtedness, make capital expenditures, engage in certain transactions with affiliates, repay other indebtedness (including the notes), make certain distributions, make acquisitions and investments, loans or advances, engage in mergers or consolidations, liquidations and dissolutions and joint ventures, sell assets, make dividends, amend certain material agreements governing our indebtedness, enter into guarantees and other contingent obligations and other matters customarily restricted in similar agreements. In addition to scheduled periodic repayments, we are also required to make mandatory repayments of the loans under the senior secured credit facilities with a portion of excess cash flow, as defined. In addition, our senior secured credit facilities contain, among others, the following financial covenants: a maximum total leverage ratio, a minimum interest coverage ratio and a maximum capital expenditure limitation. See the discussion below regarding the amendment to the senior credit agreement where these covenants have been adjusted.

18

PINNACLE FOODS GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(in thousands, except where noted in millions)

Senior Credit Agreement Amendment

On September 14, 2004, the Company was first in default under its senior credit agreement. On November 4, 2004 the Company received required lender approval to temporarily waive defaults under the Company’s senior credit agreement arising due to (i) failure to furnish on a timely basis the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2004, the Company’s annual budget for fiscal year 2005 and other related deliverables and (ii) failure to comply with the maximum total leverage ratio for the period ended October 31, 2004. Conditions of the waiver limited the Company’s access to the revolving credit facility through the addition of an anti-cash hoarding provision which required that at the time of a borrowing request, cash, as defined, could not exceed $10 million and limited total outstanding borrowings under the facility to $65 million. The amendment and waiver expired November 24, 2004.

On November 19, 2004 the Company received required lender approval to permanently waive the defaults mentioned above and amend the financial covenants for future reporting periods. The terms of the permanent amendment and waiver include:

• delivery of July 31, 2004 fiscal year end financial statements on or prior to the effective date of the amendment;

• a 50 basis point increase to the applicable rate, as defined, with respect to borrowings under the credit agreement;

• a change in the definition of consolidated cash interest expense to exclude non-cash gains or losses arising from marking interest rate swap agreements to market;

• the addition of a Senior Covenant Leverage Ratio, as defined, which ranges from a ratio of 3.75 to 1.00 to a ratio of 5.75 to 1.00 through December 2005;

• amendment of the interest expense coverage ratio (ranging from a ratio of 1.50 to 1.00 to a ratio of 2.10 to 1.00 through December 2005) and suspends the maximum total leverage ratio until March 2006;

• elimination of limitation on revolving credit exposures;

• and the following limitations, restrictions and additional reporting requirements during the amendment period which ends on the second business day following the date on which the Company delivers to the Administrative Agent financial statements for the fiscal quarter ending March 2006:

• prohibit incremental extensions of credit, as defined;

• additional limitations on indebtedness;

• limitations on acquisitions and investments;

• additional limitations on restricted payments;

• suspension of payments for management fees;

• continuation of the anti-cash hoarding provision;

• monthly financial reporting requirements, and;

• a Company election to early terminate the amendment period.

As of June 26, 2005, the Company was in compliance with the amended and added covenants as listed above.

In addition to the debt instruments discussed above, the Company entered into a short term notes payable agreement during the second quarter of 2005 for the financing of the Company’s annual insurance premiums. As of June 26, 2005, the balance of the notes payable totaled $1,449.

10. Pension and Retirement Plans

In December 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 132, “Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits (revised 2003)” (“SFAS 132R”). SFAS 132R requires additional annual and interim disclosures about pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans.

As of June 26, 2005, the Company maintains a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan that covers substantially all eligible union employees and provides benefits generally based on years of service and employees’ compensation. The Company’s pension plan is funded in conformity with the funding requirements of applicable government regulations. As disclosed in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements for the transition year ended December 26, 2004, the Company does not expect to make a contribution during the current fiscal year.

19

PINNACLE FOODS GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(in thousands, except where noted in millions)

The Company maintains a postretirement benefits plan that provides health care and life insurance benefits to eligible retirees, covers most U.S. employees and their dependents and is self-funded. Employees who have 10 years of service after the age of 45 and retire are eligible to participate in the postretirement benefit plan. Effective March 19, 2004 and in connection with the acquisition of Aurora Foods, liabilities were assumed related to eight retired employees (“Aurora Retirees”). Upon amendments that became effective on May 23, 2004, the Company’s net out-of-pocket costs for postretirement health care benefits was substantially reduced as retired employees, excluding the Aurora Retirees, are now required to pay 100% of the monthly premium cost, as calculated by our insurance administrator.

The components of net periodic benefit cost included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations are as follows:

	Pension Benefits						Other Postretirement Benefits
	Three months ended						Three months ended
	June 26,			June 27,			June 26,			June 27,
	2005			2004			2005			2004
Service cost	$	372		$	536		$	3		$	13
Interest cost		829			826			17			20
Expected return on assets		(1,052	)		(1,047	)		—			—
Recognized net actuarial loss/(gain)		—			—			2			29
Amortization of:
Unrecognized prior service cost (credit)		—			—			(84	)		(114	)
Total amount recognized	$	149		$	315		$	(62	)	$	(52	)

	Pension Benefits						Other Postretirement Benefits
	Six months ended						Six months ended
	June 26,			June 27,			June 26,			June 27,
	2005			2004			2005			2004
Service cost	$	744		$	1,015		$	6		$	68
Interest cost		1,658			1,563			34			103
Expected return on assets		(2,104	)		(1,981	)		—			—
Recognized net actuarial loss/(gain)		—			—			4			149
Amortization of:
Unrecognized prior service cost (credit)		—			—			(168	)		(581	)
Net periodic benefit cost (benefit)		298			597			(124	)		(261	)
Liability assumed in business acquisition											806
Total amount recognized	$	298		$	597		$	(124	)	$	545

On December 8, 2003, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the “Act”) was signed into law. The Act expanded Medicare to include, for the first time, coverage for prescription drugs and a federal subsidy to sponsors of certain retiree medical plans. The Company sponsors medical programs for certain of its U.S. retirees and expects that this legislation may eventually reduce the costs for some of these programs. However, due to the relative small number of participants, the Company does not expect the impact of this legislation to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

11. Financial Instruments

We may utilize derivative financial instruments to enhance our ability to manage risks, including, but not limited to, interest rate and foreign currency, which exist as part of ongoing business operations. We do not enter into contracts for speculative purposes, nor are we a party to any leveraged derivative instrument. We monitor the use of derivative financial instruments through regular communication with senior management and the utilization of written guidelines.

20

PINNACLE FOODS GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(in thousands, except where noted in millions)

We rely primarily on bank borrowings to meet our funding requirements. We utilize interest rate swap agreements or other derivative instruments to reduce the potential exposure to interest rate movements and to achieve a desired proportion of variable versus fixed rate debt. We recognize the amounts that we pay or receive on hedges related to debt as an adjustment to interest expense.

As of the start of the current year, the Company was party to four interest rate swap agreements with counterparties, including JP Morgan Chase Bank (a related party), that effectively changes the floating rate payments on its Senior Secured Credit Facility into fixed rate payments. The first swap agreement became effective April 26, 2004, terminated December 31, 2004 and had a notional amount of $545.0 million; the second swap agreement commenced January 4, 2005, terminates on January 3, 2006 and has a notional amount of $450.0 million; the third swap agreement commences January 3, 2006, terminates on January 2, 2007 and has a notional amount of $100.0 million, and the fourth swap agreement commences on January 3, 2006, terminates on January 2, 2007 and has a notional amount of $250.0 million. Interest payments determined under each swap agreement are based on these notional amounts, which match or are expected to match the Company’s outstanding borrowings under the Senior Secured Credit Facility during the periods that each interest rate swap is outstanding. Floating interest rate payments to be received under each swap are based on U.S. Dollar LIBOR, which is the same basis for determining the floating rate payments on the Senior Secured Credit Facility. The fixed interest rate payments that the Company will pay under the swap agreements are determined using the following approximate fixed interest rates: 1.39% for the swap terminated on December 31, 2004; 2.25% for the swap terminating January 1, 2006; and 3.75% for two swaps terminating January 2, 2007.

These swaps were not designated as hedges pursuant to SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” As of June 26, 2005 and December 26, 2004, the fair value of the interest rate swaps was a gain of $4,636 and $3,757, respectively. At June 26, 2005, $4,163 was recorded in Other current assets and $473 was recorded in Other assets, net in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Of the amount at December 26, 2004, $224 is recorded in Other current assets, while $3,533 was recorded in Other assets, net in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. During the three and six months ended June 26, 2005, the Company realized in cash a gain on the interest rate swaps of $337 and $561, respectively, which is recorded as a decrease to interest expense. Additionally, the Company recognized a non-cash loss during the three months ended June 26, 2005 totaling $2,882 and a non-cash gain during the six months ended June 26, 2005 totaling $879. The non cash gains and losses are recognized as an adjustment to interest expense, net in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

In August and September 2004, the Company entered into natural gas swap transactions with JP Morgan Chase Bank (a related party) to lower the Company’s exposure to the price of natural gas. The agreements became effective beginning on August 1, 2004, terminate between February 2005 and December 2005, and have various notional quantities of MMBTU’s per month. The Company will pay a fixed price per MMBTU, which range from $5.93 to $6.99 per MMBTU, depending on the month, with settlements monthly. This swap was not designed as a hedge pursuant to SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.”

As of June 26, 2005 and December 26, 2004, the fair value of the remaining natural gas swap transactions was a gain of $269 and $95, respectively, which is recorded in Other current assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. During the three and six months ended June 26, 2005, the Company realized in cash a gain of $67 and a loss of $12, respectively, on the natural gas swaps, which is recorded as an increase to cost of products sold. Additionally, the Company recognized a non-cash loss during the three months ended June 26, 2005 totaling $114 and a non-cash gain during the six months ended June 26, 2005 totaling $174. The non-cash gains and losses are recognized as an adjustment to cost of products sold in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

On March 10, 2005, the Company entered into foreign currency exchange transactions with JP Morgan Chase Bank (a related party) to lower the Company’s exposure to the exchange rates between the U.S. and Canadian dollar. Each agreement is based upon a notional amount in Canadian dollars, which is expected to approximate the amount of our Canadian subsidiary’s U.S. dollar denominated purchases for the month, and the agreements run through December 2005. The Company will pay a fixed exchange rate of 1.2062 Canadian dollars per U.S. dollar, with settlements monthly. This swap was not designed as a hedge pursuant to SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.”

21

PINNACLE FOODS GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(in thousands, except where noted in millions)

As of June 26, 2005, the fair value of the remaining foreign exchange swaps was a gain of $208, which is recorded in Other current assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. For the three and six months ended June 26, 2005, the Company realized in cash a gain of $161 and $169, respectively, on the foreign exchange swaps, which is recorded as a reduction to cost of products sold. Additionally, the Company recognized non-cash gains during the three and six months ended June 26, 2005 totaling $113 and $208, respectively. The non-cash gains and losses are recognized as an adjustment to cost of products sold in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

We utilize irrevocable standby letters of credit with one-year renewable terms to satisfy workers’ compensation self-insurance security deposit requirements. The contract value of the outstanding standby letter of credit as of June 26, 2005 was $8,096, which approximates fair value. As of June 26, 2005, we also utilized letters of credit in connection with the purchase of raw materials in the amount of $2,381, which approximates fair value.

We are exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the other parties to derivative financial instruments. All counterparties are at least “A” rated by Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s. Accordingly, we do not anticipate non-performance by the counterparties.

The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value. The estimated fair value of the Senior Secured Credit Facilities bank debt that is classified as long term debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 26, 2005, was approximately its carrying value.

12. Commitments and Contingencies

General

From time to time, the Company and its operations are parties to, or targets of, lawsuits, claims, investigations, and proceedings, which are being handled and defended in the ordinary course of business. Although the outcome of such items cannot be determined with certainty, the corporation’s general counsel and management are of the opinion that the final outcome of these matters should not have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Litigation

Pinnacle’s Fleming Bankruptcy Claim

The Company, on or about April 1, 2003, filed a reclamation claim against Fleming, a customer, in Flemings’ bankruptcy proceeding pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware in the amount of $964. Fleming has claimed that the products in controversy had been commingled with other products and that the value of Pinnacle’s claim is $0. Additionally, on or about January 31, 2004 Fleming identified alleged preferential transfers to Pinnacle of up to $6,493, of which Fleming has alleged $5,014 are, or may be, eligible for protection as “new value”. Fleming additionally alleged that some, if not all, of the alleged Pinnacle preferential transfers may qualify as “ordinary course of business” transactions. Fleming has also made claims regarding payments it describes as overpayment, unjust enrichment due to allegedly excess wire transfers and payments and debts arising out of military sales. The Company has been advised that similar allegations have been made by Fleming in many, if not all, of the other pending reclamation claims filed against Fleming. The Company is currently in the process of analyzing the claims. The Company’s attorneys have been in contact with counsel for Aurora and counsel for Fleming and all parties have expressed agreement that the most expedient manner to resolve the Aurora and Fleming claims would be to do so in the Fleming bankruptcy case under the terms of Fleming’s confirmed plan. Stipulations to this effect have been signed by all parties. The Company believes that resolution of such matters will not result in a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

22

PINNACLE FOODS GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(in thousands, except where noted in millions)

Aurora’s Fleming Bankruptcy Claim

The Company (Aurora), on or about March 31, 2003, filed a reclamation claim against Fleming, a customer, in Flemings’ bankruptcy proceeding pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware in the amount of $595. Fleming has claimed that the products in controversy had been commingled with other products and that the value of Aurora’s claim is $299. Additionally, on or about February 2, 2004, Fleming identified alleged preferential transfers to Aurora of up to $5,942, of which Fleming has alleged $3,293 are, or may be, eligible for protection as “new value”. Fleming additionally alleged that some, if not all, of the alleged Aurora preferential transfers may qualify as “ordinary course of business” transactions. Fleming has also made claims regarding payments it describes as overpayment, unjust enrichment due to allegedly excess wire transfers and payments and debts arising out of military sales. The Company has been advised that similar allegations have been made by Fleming in many, if not all, of the other pending reclamation claims filed against Fleming. The Company is currently in the process of analyzing the claims. The Company’s attorneys have been in contact with counsel for Aurora and counsel for Fleming and all parties have expressed agreement that the most expedient manner to resolve the Aurora and Fleming claims would be to do so in the Fleming bankruptcy case under the terms of Fleming’s confirmed plan. Stipulations to this effect have been signed by all parties. The Company believes that resolution of such matters will not result in a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Employee Litigation — Indemnification of US Cold Storage

On March 21, 2002, an employee at the Omaha, NE facility, died as the result of an accident while operating a forklift at a Company-leased warehouse facility. OSHA conducted a full investigation and determined that the death was the result of an accident and found no violations against the Company. On March 18, 2004, the Estate of the deceased filed suit in District Court of Sarpy County, Nebraska, Case No: CI 04-391, against the Company, the owner of the forklift and the leased warehouse, the manufacturer of the forklift and the distributor of the forklift. The Company, having been the deceased’s employer, was named as a defendant for worker’s compensation subrogation purposes only.

On May 18, 2004, the Company received notice from defendant, US Cold Storage, requesting the Company to accept the tender of defense for US Cold Storage in this case in accordance with the Indemnification provision of the warehouse lease. The request has been submitted to the Company’s insurance carrier for evaluation and the Company has been advised that the indemnification provision is not applicable in this matter and that Company should have no liability under that provision. Therefore, the Company believes that resolution of such matters will not result in a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

R2 Appeal in Aurora Bankruptcy

Prior to its bankruptcy filing, Aurora entered into an agreement with its prepetition lending group compromising the amount of certain fees due under its senior bank facilities (the “October Amendment”). One of the members of the bank group (R2 Top Hat, Ltd.) challenged the enforceability of the October Amendment during Aurora’s bankruptcy by filing an adversary proceeding and by objecting to confirmation. The bankruptcy court rejected the lender’s argument and confirmed Aurora’s plan of reorganization. The lender then appealed from those orders of the bankruptcy court. The appeals are pending. It is too early to predict the outcome of the appeals. Included in the Company’s accrued liabilities is $20 million, which was assumed in the Aurora Transaction.

State of Illinois v. City of St. Elmo and Aurora Foods Inc.

The Company is a defendant in an action filed by the State of Illinois regarding the Company’s St. Elmo facility. The Illinois Attorney General filed a complaint seeking a restraining order prohibiting further discharges by the City of St. Elmo from its publicly owned wastewater treatment facility in violation of Illinois law and enjoining the Company from discharging its industrial waste into the City’s treatment facility. The complaint also asked for fines and penalties associated with the City’s discharge from its treatment facility and the Company’s alleged operation of its production facility without obtaining a state environmental operating permit.

23

PINNACLE FOODS GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(in thousands, except where noted in millions)

On August 30, 2004, an Interim Consent Order signed by all parties was signed and entered by the Judge in the case whereby, in addition to a number of actions required of the City, the Company agreed to provide monthly discharge monitoring reports to the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency for six (6) months and was allowed to continue discharging effluent to the City of St. Elmo. In September 2004, the Company met with representatives from the State of Illinois Environmental Protection Agency and the State Attorney General’s Office and separately with the City of St. Elmo to inform them that the Company intended to install a pre-treatment system at its St. Elmo facility during the fourth quarter of 2004 and first quarter of 2005. The State issued the construction and operating permits to the Company and construction of the pre-treatment system has been completed. Testing is underway and the system is currently scheduled to be fully operational by the end of August 2005.

We continue to discharge our effluent to the City. We would vigorously defend any future effort to prevent us from discharging our industrial wastewater to the City. Although we believe we will be able to resolve this matter favorably, an adverse resolution may have a material impact on our financial position, results of operation, or cash flows.

Underweight Products

In July 2004, it came to our attention that certain products produced in one of the former Aurora plants have not met some state weight requirements. While we are in the process of investigating the scope of this issue, we have revised the operating procedures of the plant such that products produced there will comply with state product weight requirements. As a result of these weight issues, we voluntarily initiated return procedures for the product in the locations involved and also disposed of certain inventory held by the Company. Pinnacle has recorded a charge related to the returns and inventory of $3.4 million and $1.2 million in the fiscal year ended July 31, 2004 and the transition year ended December 26, 2004, respectively. As a result of these underweight products, the Company has recently received a letter from the State of California, County of Santa Barbara, requesting that the Company meet with it to discuss this issue and the remedial actions taken by the Company. A meeting was held with the involved California officials on December 8, 2004 at which time the issues and corrective steps taken by the Company were presented and discussed. While the Company believes it has taken appropriate remedial steps, it is probable that fines and penalties will be imposed. The State has recently responded with its acknowledgment of the Company’s cooperation with the investigation and prompt reaction to and correction of the issue, and proposed a settlement amount which the Company is negotiating with the State. As of March 27, 2005, the Company has reserved $695 based upon the State of California’s latest settlement proposal. The Company will continue to vigorously defend its actions to date since taking control of Aurora Foods Inc.. The Company believes that resolution of such matters will not result in a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

American Cold Storage – North America, L/P. v. P.F. Distribution, LLC and Pinnacle Foods Group Inc.

On June 26, 2005 the Company was served with the Summons and Complaint in the above matter. American Cold Storage (“ACS”) operates a frozen storage warehouse and distribution facility (the “Facility”) located in Madison County, Tennessee, near the Company’s Jackson, Tennessee plant. In approximately April 2004, the Company entered into discussions with ACS to utilize the Facility. Terms were discussed, but no contract was ever signed. Shortly after shipping product to the Facility, the Company realized that the Facility was incapable of properly handling the discussed volume of product and began reducing its shipments to the Facility. The complaint seeks damages not to exceed $1.5 million, together with associated costs. It is too early to determine the likely outcome of this litigation. The Company is investigating and intends to vigorously defend against this claim.

Other Matters

Bankruptcy filing of Winn-Dixie

On February 21, 2005, Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., a customer that accounts for approximately 2% of the Company annual net sales, filed for Chapter 11 reorganization in U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York. The amount due from Winn-Dixie at the time of the bankruptcy filing was $764, which was adequately reserved.

24

PINNACLE FOODS GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(in thousands, except where noted in millions)

13. Related Party Transactions

Management fees

On November 25, 2003, the Successor entered into a Management Agreement with JPMorgan Partners, LLC (“JPMP”) and J.W. Childs Associates, L.P. (“JWC”) where JPMP and JWC provide management, advisory and other services. The agreement calls for quarterly payments of $125 to each JPMP and JWC for management fees. In accordance with our Senior Credit Agreement Amendment (see Note 9), the payment of the management fees was suspended during the amendment period and therefore, no payments have been made during the three and six months ended June 26, 2005. Management fees to JPMP and JWC in total included in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three and six months ended June 27, 2004 were $250 and $598, respectively. In addition, the Company reimbursed JWC and JPMP for out-of-pocket expenses totaling $6 and $11 during the three and six months ended June 26, 2005, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 27, 2004, reimbursed expenses totaled $20 and $21, respectively. In connection with the Pinnacle Merger, the Company paid a transaction fee of $2,425 to each JPMP and JWC, in addition to $441 in fees and expenses. In connection with the Aurora Transaction, transaction fees were paid to JPMP and JWC of $1 million to each, plus $119 in fees and expenses. In connection with any subsequent acquisition transaction, there will be a transaction fee of¹/2% of the aggregate purchase price to each of JPMP and JWC, plus fees and expenses. These transaction fees were included in the acquisition costs in each of the transactions.

Also on November 25, 2003, the Successor entered into an agreement with CDM Capital LLC, an affiliate of CDM Investor Group LLC, where CDM Capital LLC will receive a transaction fee of¹/2% of the aggregate purchase price of future acquisitions (other than the Pinnacle Merger or the Aurora Transaction), plus fees and expenses.

Leases and Aircraft

The Company leases office space owned by a party related to the Chairman. One office was leased through January 15, 2004. A new office was leased beginning January 15, 2004. The new lease provides for the Company to make leasehold improvements approximating $318. The base rent for the new office is $87 annually compared to $245 annually scheduled in the old office. Rent expense during the three and six months ended June 26, 2005 was $25 and $50, respectively. Rent expense during the three and six months ended June 27, 2004 was $22 and $50, respectively.

Beginning November 25, 2003, the Company began using an aircraft owned by a company indirectly owned by the Chairman. In connection with the usage of the aircraft, the Company paid net operating expenses of $687 and $1,375 during the three and six months ended June 26, 2005. Net operating expenses for the aircraft during the three and six months ended June 27, 2004 was $741 and $1,053, respectively.

Debt and Interest Expense

For the three and six months ended June 26, 2005, fees and interest expense recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the debt to the related party, JPMorgan Chase Bank, amounted to $65 and $153, respectively. Additionally, we paid to JPMorgan Chase Bank fees and interest expense totaling $76 during the three and six months ended June 27, 2004. See Note 9.

Financial Instruments

The Company has entered into transactions for derivative financial instruments with JPMorgan Chase Bank to lower its exposure to interest rates, foreign currency, and natural gas prices. During the three and six months ended June 26, 2005, the total net cash received by the Company for the settlement of interest rate swaps, foreign exchange swaps, and natural gas swaps totaled $565 and $718, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 27, 2004, the total cash received by the Company for the settlement of interest rate swaps was $3,515. See Note 11.

25

PINNACLE FOODS GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(in thousands, except where noted in millions)

Loan to Member of Management

In February 2005, the Company loaned Mr. Daniel Parker, Senior Vice President, Supply Chain, $41. The interest rate on the loan is 8%. The outstanding balance as of June 26, 2005 is $21 and it is expected to be paid in full by the end of 2005.

14. Segments

The Company’s products and operations are managed and reported in two operating segments. The Frozen Foods segment consists of the following: dinners and entrees (Swanson, Hungry Man), prepared seafood (Van de Kamp’s, Mrs. Paul’s), breakfast (Aunt Jemima), bagels (Lenders), and other frozen products (Celeste, Chef’s Choice). The Dry Foods segment consists of the following product lines: pickles, peppers, and relish (Vlasic), baking mixes and frostings (Duncan Hines), syrups and pancake mixes (Mrs. Butterworth’s and Log Cabin), and other grocery products (Open Pit). Segment performance is evaluated based on earnings before interest and taxes. Transfers between segments and geographic areas are recorded at cost plus markup or at market. Identifiable assets are those assets, including goodwill, which are identified with the operations in each segment or geographic region. Cost of products sold for the three and six months ended June 27, 2004 includes $13,819 and $31,092, respectively representing the write-up of inventories to fair value (net realizable value, which is defined as estimated selling prices less the sum of (a) costs of disposal and (b) a reasonable profit allowance for the selling effort of the acquiring entity) at the dates of the acquisitions of inventories, which were sold subsequent to the acquisition dates. Of these amounts, $4,448 was included in the frozen foods segment and $9,371 in the dry foods segment during the three months ended June 27, 2004, while $6,948 was included in the frozen foods segment and $24,144 in the dry foods segment during the six months ended June 27, 2004. Corporate assets consist of deferred and prepaid income tax assets. Unallocated corporate expenses consist of corporate overhead such as executive management, finance and legal functions, and Pinnacle and Aurora merger related costs discussed in Note 6.

	Three months ended						Six months ended
	June 26,			June 27,			June 26,			June 27,
SEGMENT INFORMATION	2005			2004			2005			2004
Net sales
Frozen foods	$	155,109		$	142,916		$	336,448		$	239,225
Dry foods		151,505			141,324			278,003			194,487
Total	$	306,614		$	284,240		$	614,451		$	433,712
Earnings (loss) before interest and taxes
Frozen foods	$	5,229		$	(4,702	)	$	645		$	(19,517	)
Dry foods		24,412			14,491			32,197			4,700
Unallocated corporate expenses		(3,779	)		(4,140	)		(8,696	)		(16,079	)
Total	$	25,862		$	5,649		$	24,146		$	(30,896	)
Depreciation and amortization
Frozen foods	$	9,381		$	8,875		$	14,521		$	12,038
Dry foods		3,317			4,750			6,808			6,354
Total	$	12,698		$	13,625		$	21,329		$	18,392
Capital expenditures
Frozen foods	$	7,684		$	3,657		$	10,161		$	4,495
Dry foods		1,358			1,867			2,108			2,880
Total	$	9,042		$	5,524		$	12,269		$	7,375

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
Net sales
United States	$	293,090	$	276,260	$	589,799	$	417,043
Canada		13,524		7,980		24,652		16,669
Total	$	306,614	$	284,240	$	614,451	$	433,712

26

PINNACLE FOODS GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(in thousands, except where noted in millions)

	June 26,		December 26,
SEGMENT INFORMATION:	2005		2004
Total Assets
Frozen foods	$	657,048	$	671,860
Dry foods		1,066,715		1,092,196
Corporate		46		884
Total	$	1,723,809	$	1,764,940

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
Long-lived assets
United States	$	215,637	$	223,719
Canada		27		21
Total	$	215,664	$	223,740

15. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment (Revised 2004).” This statement addresses the accounting for share-based payment transactions in which a company receives employee services in exchange for the company’s equity instruments or liabilities that are based on the fair value of the company’s equity securities or may be settled by the issuance of these securities. SFAS 123R eliminates the ability to account for share-based compensation using APB 25 and generally requires that such transactions be accounted for using a fair value method. The provisions of this statement are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2005 and will become effective for the Company beginning in 2006. Alternative transition methods are allowed under Statement No. 123R. While the Company has not yet determined the transition method to use, adequate disclosure of all comparative periods covered by the financial statements will comply with the requirements of FASB 123R.

In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs—an Amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4.” This statement clarifies the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and spoilage, requiring these items be recognized as current-period charges. In addition, this statement requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. The provisions of this statement are effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005 and will become effective for the Company beginning in 2006. The Company is assessing what impact, if any, adoption of this statement would have on its financial statements.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets—an amendment to APB Opinion No. 29.” This statement amends APB 29 to eliminate the exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. A nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. The provisions of this statement are effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company is assessing what impact, if any, adoption of this statement would have on its financial statements.

In March 2005, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143 (FIN 47). FIN 47 clarifies that the term “conditional asset retirement obligation” as used in FASB Statement No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, refers to a legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and (or) method of settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. FIN 47 is effective no later than the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. The effect of adopting FIN 47 on the Company’s financial position and results of operations has not yet been determined.

27

PINNACLE FOODS GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(in thousands, except where noted in millions)

16. Guarantor and Nonguarantor Statements

In connection with the Pinnacle Merger and Aurora Transaction and as a part of the related financings, the Company issued $394 million of 8¹/4% senior subordinated notes ($200 million in November 2003 and $194 million in February 2004, collectively referred to as the “Notes”) in private placements pursuant to Rule 144A and Regulation S. The Notes are general unsecured obligations of the Company, subordinated in right of payment to all existing and future senior indebtedness of the Company, and guaranteed on a full, unconditional, joint and several basis by the Company’s wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries.

The following consolidating financial information presents:

(1)	Consolidating (a) balance sheets as of June 26, 2005 and December 26, 2004 and (b) the related statements of operations and cash flows for the three and six months ended June 26, 2005 and June 27, 2004.
(2)	Elimination entries necessary to consolidate the Successor, with its guarantor subsidiaries and nonguarantor subsidiary.

Investments in subsidiaries are accounted for by the parent using the equity method of accounting. The guarantor subsidiaries are presented on a combined basis. The principal elimination entries eliminate investments in subsidiaries and intercompany balances and transactions.

28

PINNACLE FOODS GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(in thousands, except where noted in millions)

Pinnacle Foods Group Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheet — Successor
June 26, 2005

	Pinnacle
	Foods			Guarantor			Nonguarantor					Consolidated
	Group Inc.			Subsidiaries			Subsidiary		Eliminations			Total
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	34		$	11,992		$	1,199	$	—		$	13,225
Accounts receivable, net		42,122			29,937			3,743		—			75,802
Intercompany accounts receivable		—			27,580			—		(27,580	)		—
Inventories, net		55,410			108,038			2,917		—			166,365
Other current assets		4,271			3,173			34		—			7,478
Deferred income taxes		—			—			22		—			22
Total current assets		101,837			180,720			7,915		(27,580	)		262,892
Plant assets, net		97,561			118,076			27		—			215,664
Investment in subsidiaries		268,566			3,089			—		(271,655	)		—
Intercompany note receivable		185,233			—			—		(185,233	)		—
Tradenames		674,388			106,156			—		—			780,544
Other assets, net		49,342			255			—		—			49,597
Goodwill		272,618			142,494			—		—			415,112
Total assets	$	1,649,545		$	550,790		$	7,942	$	(484,468	)	$	1,723,809
Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term obligations	$	5,460		$	118		$	—	$	—		$	5,578
Notes payable					1,449			—		—			1,449
Accounts payable		24,115			35,707			1,914		—			61,736
Intercompany accounts payable		26,753			—			827		(27,580	)		—
Accrued trade marketing expense		19,733			16,265			756		—			36,754
Accrued liabilities		60,005			24,648			265		—			84,918
Accrued income taxes		58			1,162			1,090		—			2,310
Total current liabilities		136,124			79,349			4,852		(27,580	)		192,745
Long-term debt		934,312			146			—		—			934,458
Intercompany note payable		—			185,233			—		(185,233	)		—
Postretirement benefits		838			1,978			—		—			2,816
Deferred income taxes		209,344			15,518			1		—			224,863
Total liabilities		1,280,618			282,224			4,853		(212,813	)		1,354,882
Commitments and contingencies		—			—			—		—			—
Shareholder’s equity:
Pinnacle Common Stock, $.01 par value		—			—			—		—			—
Additional paid-in-capital		519,433			287,710			935		(288,645	)		519,433
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		53			53			53		(106	)		53
Carryover of Predecessor basis of net assets		(17,338	)		—			—		—			(17,338	)
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)		(133,221	)		(19,197	)		2,101		17,096			(133,221	)
Total shareholder’s equity		368,927			268,566			3,089		(271,655	)		368,927
Total liabilities and shareholder’s equity	$	1,649,545		$	550,790		$	7,942	$	(484,468	)	$	1,723,809

29

PINNACLE FOODS GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(in thousands, except where noted in millions)

Pinnacle Foods Group Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheet — Successor
December 26, 2004

	Pinnacle
	Foods			Guarantor			Nonguarantor					Consolidated
	Group Inc.			Subsidiaries			Subsidiary		Eliminations			Total
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	490		$	1,745				$	—		$	2,235
Accounts receivable, net		40,488			29,308			4,569		—			74,365
Intercompany accounts receivable		4,439			—			—		(4,439	)		—
Inventories, net		70,443			131,788			3,279		—			205,510
Other current assets		940			2,968			83		—			3,991
Deferred income taxes		—			—			22					22
Total current assets		116,800			165,809			7,953		(4,439	)		286,123
Plant assets, net		101,774			121,945			21		—			223,740
Investment in subsidiaries		263,384			1,183			—		(264,567	)		—
Intercompany note receivable		182,054			543			—		(182,597	)		—
Tradenames		674,388			106,156			—		—			780,544
Other assets, net		57,493			177			—		—			57,670
Goodwill		272,618			144,245			—		—			416,863
Total assets	$	1,668,511		$	540,058		$	7,974	$	(451,603	)	$	1,764,940
Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term obligations	$	5,460		$	114		$	—	$	—		$	5,574
Accounts payable		51,815			33,894			2,212		—			87,921
Intercompany accounts payable		—			3,001			1,438		(4,439	)		—
Accrued trade marketing expense		30,864			12,813			2,337		—			46,014
Accrued liabilities		50,796			26,817			122		—			77,735
Accrued income taxes		99			1,240			138		—			1,477
Total current liabilities		139,034			77,879			6,247		(4,439	)		218,721
Long-term debt		937,300			206			—		—			937,506
Intercompany note payable		—			182,054			543		(182,597	)		—
Postretirement benefits		825			2,115					—			2,940
Deferred income taxes		197,985			14,420			1		—			212,406
Total liabilities		1,275,144			276,674			6,791		(187,036	)		1,371,573
Commitments and contingencies		—			—			—		—			—
Shareholder’s equity:
Pinnacle Common Stock, $.01 par value		—			—			—		—			—
Additional paid-in-capital		519,433			287,710			935		(288,645	)		519,433
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		48			48			48		(96	)		48
Carryover of Predecessor basis of net assets		(17,495	)		—			—		—			(17,495	)
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)		(108,619	)		(24,374	)		200		24,174			(108,619	)
Total shareholder’s equity		393,367			263,384			1,183		(264,567	)		393,367
Total liabilities and shareholder’s equity	$	1,668,511		$	540,058		$	7,974	$	(451,603	)	$	1,764,940

30

PINNACLE FOODS GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(in thousands, except where noted in millions)

Pinnacle Foods Group Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Operations — Successor
For the three months ended June 26, 2005

	Pinnacle
	Foods			Guarantor			Nonguarantor					Consolidated
	Group Inc.			Subsidiaries			Subsidiary		Eliminations			Total
Net sales	$	147,783		$	150,666		$	13,524	$	(5,359	)	$	306,614
Costs and expenses
Cost of products sold		124,227			117,906			9,254		(5,167	)		246,220
Marketing and selling expenses		11,570			9,245			1,196		—			22,011
Administrative expenses		5,201			4,629			267		—			10,097
Research and development expenses		483			443			—		—			926
Intercompany royalties		—			—			71		(71	)		—
Intercompany technical service fees		—			—			121		(121	)		—
Other expense (income), net		1,239			259			—		—			1,498
Equity in loss (earnings) of investees		(16,048	)		(1,663	)		—		17,711			—
Total costs and expenses		126,672			130,819			10,909		12,352			280,752
Income (loss) before interest and taxes		21,111			19,847			2,615		(17,711	)		25,862
Intercompany interest (income) expense		(3,263	)		3,263			—		—			—
Interest expense		20,870			12			—		—			20,882
Interest income		—			162			5		—			167
Income (loss) before income taxes		3,504			16,734			2,620		(17,711	)		5,147
Provision for income taxes		5,678			686			957		—			7,321
Net (loss) earnings	$	(2,174	)	$	16,048		$	1,663	$	(17,711	)	$	(2,174	)

31

PINNACLE FOODS GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(in thousands, except where noted in millions)

Pinnacle Foods Group Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Operations — Successor
For the three months ended June 27, 2004

	Pinnacle
	Foods			Guarantor			Nonguarantor					Consolidated
	Group Inc.			Subsidiaries			Subsidiary		Eliminations			Total
Net sales	$	127,331		$	153,046		$	7,980	$	(4,117	)	$	284,240
Costs and expenses
Cost of products sold		108,649			127,533			6,665		(3,870	)		238,977
Marketing and selling expenses		11,813			11,166			526		—			23,505
Administrative expenses		6,671			7,103			282		—			14,056
Research and development expenses		523			544			—		—			1,067
Intercompany royalties		—			—			75		(75	)		—
Intercompany technical service fees		—			—			172		(172	)		—
Other expense (income), net		967			19			—		—			986
Equity in loss (earnings) of investees		(4,608	)		(166	)		—		4,774			—
Total costs and expenses		124,015			146,199			7,720		657			278,591
(Loss) earnings before interest and taxes		3,316			6,847			260		(4,774	)		5,649
Intercompany interest (income) expense		(2,297	)		2,290			7		—			—
Interest expense		8,910			(604	)		—		—			8,306
Interest income		56			63			4		—			123
(Loss) earnings before income taxes		(3,241	)		5,224			257		(4,774	)		(2,534	)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		5,466			616			91		—			6,173
Net (loss) earnings	$	(8,707	)	$	4,608		$	166	$	(4,774	)	$	(8,707	)

32

PINNACLE FOODS GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(in thousands, except where noted in millions)

Pinnacle Foods Group Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Operations — Successor
For the six months ended June 26, 2005

	Pinnacle
	Foods			Guarantor			Nonguarantor					Consolidated
	Group Inc.			Subsidiaries			Subsidiary		Eliminations			Total
Net sales	$	328,054		$	273,576		$	24,652	$	(11,831	)	$	614,451
Costs and expenses
Cost of products sold		267,408			233,244			18,732		(11,397	)		507,987
Marketing and selling expenses		32,594			18,439			1,929		—			52,962
Administrative expenses		12,458			9,452			556		—			22,466
Research and development expenses		1,110			856			—		—			1,966
Intercompany royalties		—			—			145		(145	)		—
Intercompany technical service fees		—			—			289		(289	)		—
Other expense (income), net		3,934			990			—					4,924
Equity in loss (earnings) of investees		(5,177	)		(1,901	)		—		7,078			—
Total costs and expenses		312,327			261,080			21,651		(4,753	)		590,305
Income (loss) before interest and taxes		15,727			12,496			3,001		(7,078	)		24,146
Intercompany interest (income) expense		(6,207	)		6,205			2		—			—
Interest expense		35,118			17			—		—			35,135
Interest income		—			213			10		—			223
Income (loss) before income taxes		(13,184	)		6,487			3,009		(7,078	)		(10,766	)
Provision for income taxes		11,418			1,310			1,108		—			13,836
Net (loss) earnings	$	(24,602	)	$	5,177		$	1,901	$	(7,078	)	$	(24,602	)

33

PINNACLE FOODS GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(in thousands, except where noted in millions)

Pinnacle Foods Group Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Operations — Successor
For the six months ended June 27, 2004

	Pinnacle
	Foods			Guarantor			Nonguarantor					Consolidated
	Group Inc.			Subsidiaries			Subsidiary		Eliminations			Total
Net sales	$	138,396		$	286,008		$	16,669	$	(7,361	)	$	433,712
Costs and expenses
Cost of products sold		123,818			246,592			13,144		(6,855	)		376,699
Marketing and selling expenses		14,352			25,471			1,868		—			41,691
Administrative expenses		7,389			16,531			596		—			24,516
Research and development expenses		523			1,257			—		—			1,780
Intercompany royalties		—			—			157		(157	)		—
Intercompany technical service fees		—			—			349		(349	)		—
Other expense (income), net		8,463			11,459			—		—			19,922
Equity in loss (earnings) of investees		14,075			(354	)		—		(13,721	)		—
Total costs and expenses		168,620			300,956			16,114		(21,082	)		464,608
(Loss) earnings before interest and taxes		(30,224	)		(14,948	)		555		13,721			(30,896	)
Intercompany interest (income) expense		(3,749	)		3,736			13		—			—
Interest expense		18,503			(605	)		—		—			17,898
Interest income		88			80			8		—			176
(Loss) earnings before income taxes		(44,890	)		(17,999	)		550		13,721			(48,618	)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		3,836			(3,924	)		196		—			108
Net (loss) earnings	$	(48,726	)	$	(14,075	)	$	354	$	13,721		$	(48,726	)

34

PINNACLE FOODS GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(in thousands, except where noted in millions)

Pinnacle Foods Group Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows — Successor
For the six months ended June 26, 2005

	Pinnacle
	Foods			Guarantor			Nonguarantor						Consolidated
	Group Inc.			Subsidiaries			Subsidiary			Eliminations			Total
Cash flows from operating activities
Net (loss) earnings from operations	$	(24,602	)	$	5,177		$	1,901		$	(7,078	)	$	(24,602	)
Non-cash charges (credits) to net earnings
Depreciation and amortization		12,541			8,785			3			—			21,329
Restructuring and impairment charge		1,502			—			—			—			1,502
Amortization of debt acquisition costs		2,614			—			—			—			2,614
Amortization of bond premium		(257	)		—			—			—			(257	)
Change in value of financial instruments		(1,261	)		—			—			—			(1,261	)
Equity in loss (earnings) of investees		(5,177	)		(1,901	)		—			7,078			—
Postretirement healthcare benefits		13			(137	)		—			—			(124	)
Pension expense		—			298			—			—			298
Deferred income taxes		11,359			1,098			—			—			12,457
Changes in working capital
Accounts receivable		(1,634	)		(629	)		826			—			(1,437	)
Intercompany accounts receivable/payable		29,090			(28,479	)		(611	)		—			—
Inventories		15,033			23,750			362			—			39,145
Accrued trade marketing expense		(11,131	)		3,452			(1,581	)		—			(9,260	)
Accounts payable		(27,702	)		2,153			(298	)		—			(25,847	)
Other current assets and liabilities		5,672			1,948			606			—			8,226
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		6,060			15,515			1,208			—			22,783
Cash flows from investing activities
Capital expenditures		(6,796	)		(5,464	)		(9	)		—			(12,269	)
Pinnacle merger consideration		1,595			—			—			—			1,595
Sale of plant assets		—			561			—			—			561
Net cash used in investing activities		(5,201	)		(4,903	)		(9	)		—			(10,113	)
Cash flows from financing activities
Change in bank overdrafts		—			(308	)		—			—			(308	)
Repayment of capital lease obligations		(5	)		(57	)		—			—			(62	)
Successor’s debt acquisition costs		(34	)		—			—			—			(34	)
Proceeds from Successor’s notes payable borrowings		31,626			—			—			—			31,626
Repayments of Successor’s notes payable		(30,177	)		—			—			—			(30,177	)
Repayments of Successor’s long term obligations		(2,725	)		—			—			—			(2,725	)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(1,315	)		(365	)		—			—			(1,680	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		—			—			—			—			—
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		(456	)		10,247			1,199			—			10,990
Cash and cash equivalents — beginning of period		490			1,745			—			—			2,235
Cash and cash equivalents — end of period	$	34		$	11,992		$	1,199		$	—		$	13,225
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Interest paid	$	30,184		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	30,184
Interest received		—			213			10			—			223
Income taxes refunded (paid)		—			622			(184	)		—			438

35

PINNACLE FOODS GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(in thousands, except where noted in millions)

Pinnacle Foods Group Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows — Successor
For the six months ended June 27, 2004

	Pinnacle
	Foods			Guarantor			Nonguarantor						Consolidated
	Group Inc.			Subsidiaries			Subsidiary			Eliminations			Total
Cash flows from operating activities
Net (loss) earnings from operations	$	(48,726	)	$	(14,075	)	$	354		$	13,721		$	(48,726	)
Non-cash charges (credits) to net earnings
Depreciation and amortization		5,538			12,851			3			—			18,392
Restructuring and impairment charge		—			10,025			—			—			10,025
Amortization of debt acquisition costs		1,907			—			—			—			1,907
Amortization of bond premium		(276	)		—			—			—			(276	)
Change in value of financial instruments		(3,290	)		—			—			—			(3,290	)
Equity in loss (earnings) of investees		14,075			(354	)		—			(13,721	)		—
Equity related compensation charge		7,400			—			—			—			7,400
Postretirement healthcare benefits		6			(267	)		—			—			(261	)
Pension expense		—			597			—			—			597
Deferred income taxes		3,836			(4,114	)		—			—			(278	)
Changes in working capital
Accounts receivable		(46,768	)		56,007			5			—			9,244
Intercompany accounts receivable/payable		(7,861	)		8,693			(832	)		—			—
Inventories		(64,120	)		90,273			(84	)		—			26,069
Accrued trade marketing expense		24,533			(23,961	)		165			—			737
Accounts payable		33,367			(14,364	)		(9	)		—			18,994
Other current assets and liabilities		70,333			(87,822	)		799			—			(16,690	)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		(10,046	)		33,489			401			—			23,844
Cash flows from investing activities
Capital expenditures		(2,652	)		(4,721	)		(2	)		—			(7,375	)
Pinnacle merger consideration		(738	)		—			—			—			(738	)
Aurora merger consideration		(663,759	)		—			—			—			(663,759	)
Aurora merger costs		(13,174	)		—			—			—			(13,174	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(680,323	)		(4,721	)		(2	)		—			(685,046	)
Cash flows from financing activities
Change in bank overdrafts		—			12,683			—			—			12,683
Repayment of capital lease obligations		(16	)		—			—			—			(16	)
Equity contribution to Successor		95,276			—			—			—			95,276
Successor’s debt acquisition costs		(16,691	)		—			—			—			(16,691	)
Proceeds from Successor’s bond offerings		200,976			—			—			—			200,976
Proceeds from Successor’s bank term loan		425,000			—			—			—			425,000
Repayments of Successor’s notes payable		(14,000	)		—			—			—			(14,000	)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		690,545			12,683			—			—			703,228
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		—			—			—			—			—
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		176			41,451			399			—			42,026
Cash and cash equivalents — beginning of period		—			4,751			503			—			5,254
Cash and cash equivalents — end of period	$	176		$	46,202		$	902		$	—		$	47,280
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Interest paid	$	22,233		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	22,233
Interest received		88			78			10			—			176
Income taxes refunded (paid)		—			(22	)		—			—			(22	)

36

ITEM 2: MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

(in millions, except where noted)

The purpose of this section is to discuss and analyze our consolidated financial condition, liquidity and capital resources and results of operations. You should read this analysis in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying footnotes and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the transition period ended December 26, 2004. This section contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are based on management’s beliefs, assumptions and expectations of our future economic performance, taking into account the information currently available to management. These statements are not statements of historical fact. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual results, performance or financial condition to differ materially from the expectations of future results, performance or financial condition we express or imply in any forward-looking statements. Factors that could contribute to these differences include, but are not limited to: changes in demand for our products, changes in distribution channels or competitive conditions in the markets where we operate, loss of our intellectual property rights, fluctuations in the price or supply of raw materials, seasonality, our reliance on co-packers to meet our manufacturing needs, competition and industry trends. The words “believe,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “objective,” “seek,” “strive,” or similar words, or the negative of these words, identify forward-looking statements entirely by these cautionary factors.

Overview

We are a leading producer, marketer and distributor of high quality, branded food products, the results of which are managed and reported in two operating segments: frozen foods and dry foods. The frozen foods segment consists of the following: dinners and entrees (Swanson, Hungry-Man), prepared seafood (Van de Kamp’s, Mrs. Paul’s) breakfast (Aunt Jemima), bagels (Lenders), and other frozen products (Celeste, Chef’s Choice). The dry foods segment consists of the following product lines: pickles, peppers, and relish (Vlasic), baking mixes and frostings (Duncan Hines), syrups and pancake mixes (Mrs. Butterworth’s and Log Cabin), and other grocery products (Open Pit).

Pinnacle Foods Holding Corporation (“PFHC”) and certain newly-formed investor companies consummated a merger (the “Pinnacle Merger” or “Merger”) effective November 24, 2003. For purposes of identification and description, the Company is referred to as the “Predecessor” for the period prior to the Pinnacle Merger, and the “Successor” for the period subsequent to the Pinnacle Merger. Also, as described in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, on March 19, 2004, in connection with the comprehensive restructuring of Aurora Foods Inc., the “Aurora Transaction” resulted in the merger of Pinnacle and Aurora, with Pinnacle as the accounting acquiror. The consolidated financial statements include the results of operations of the Aurora businesses beginning March 19, 2004. Also, see Note 3 for pro forma financial information.

In November 2003, we entered into a $675.0 million credit agreement (“senior secured credit facilities”) with JPMorgan Chase Bank (a related party) and other financial institutions as lenders, which provides for a $545.0 million seven-year term loan B facility, of which $120.0 million was made available in connection with the Pinnacle Merger and $425.0 million was made available as a delayed draw term loan on the closing date of the Aurora Transaction. The senior secured credit facilities also provide for a six-year $130.0 million revolving credit facility, of which up to $65.0 million was made available on November 25, 2003, and the remaining $65.0 million was made available on the closing date of the Aurora Transaction. The revolving credit facility expires November 25, 2009. There were no borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit facility as of June 26, 2005 and December 26, 2004.

Additionally, in November 2003 and February 2004, we issued $200 million and $194 million, respectively, 8¹/4% senior subordinated notes. The terms of the November 2003 and February 2004 notes are the same and are issued under the same indenture.

During the thirty-six weeks ended July 31, 2004, our earnings (loss) before interest and taxes were negatively impacted by certain non-cash items. These items included $18.4 million of non-cash equity compensation for certain ownership units of Crunch Equity Holding, LLC (“LLC”) issued to CDM Investor Group LLC, which is controlled by certain members of PFGI’s management. Additionally, $39.5 million related to the increase in the fair market value of inventory acquired in the Pinnacle Merger and Aurora Transaction and was charged against earnings. The increase in fair market value represents a non-cash charge.

37

In December 2004, our board of directors approved a change in our fiscal year end from July 31 to the last Sunday in December. Accordingly, we are presenting unaudited consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 26, 2005 and for the three and six months ended June 27, 2004.

During the six months ended June 26, 2005, the twenty-one weeks ended December 26, 2004 (the “transition year”) and the thirty-six weeks ended July 31, 2004 (fiscal 2004), we recorded restructuring charges totaling $1.0 million, $3.9 million and $11.8 million, respectively, pertaining to our decision to permanently close the Omaha, Nebraska production facility. The closure was part of our plan of consolidating and streamlining production activities after the Aurora Merger.

In October 2004, we decided to discontinue producing products under the Chef’s Choice trade name, which is reported under our frozen foods segment. In connection with this decision, we recorded in fiscal 2004 non-cash impairment charges totaling $4.8 million related to goodwill ($1.8 million), amortizable intangibles ($1.7 million), and fixed assets ($1.3 million). Additionally, in fiscal 2004, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $1.3 million for the write down of the Avalon Bay trade name due to lower than expected future sales.

During the transition year, we recorded non-cash impairment charges to goodwill and trade names totaling $4.3 million and less than $0.1 million, respectively. The write downs were the result of higher than expected costs in the bagels and frozen dinners business units. All of the charges were recorded in the frozen foods segment.

On November 4, 2004, our lenders agreed to temporarily waive certain defaults under the senior secured credit facilities arising due to (i) failure to furnish on a timely basis our audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2004, our annual budget for fiscal year 2005 and other related deliverables and (ii) failure to comply with certain financial covenants for the October 31, 2004 reporting period.

On November 19, 2004 subject to certain conditions, we received required lender approval to permanently waive the defaults discussed above and modify the financial covenants for future reporting periods. The terms of the permanent amendment and waiver are discussed later in this section. We are currently in compliance with the covenants under the senior secured credit facilities.

During the first quarter of 2005, our earnings (loss) before interest and taxes were negatively impacted by certain items. In April 2005, we announced plans to shutdown a production line in our Mattoon, Illinois production facility and incurred a non-cash charge for an impairment write down of fixed assets totaling $0.9 million. In April 2005, we announced plans to permanently close the Erie, Pennsylvania production facility and incurred charges totaling $0.7 million pertaining to employee severance and related costs. This charge was included in the results of operations for the six months ended June 26, 2005 and is recorded in other expense (income), net in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

Additionally, in the continuing effort to revitalize our brands, we introduced several new products during the first quarter of 2005 and incurred a substantially higher level of slotting expenses and a higher level of coupon expenses. We do not expect these levels of expense to continue throughout the remainder of the year. Both slotting and coupon expenses are deducted from shipments (as discussed below) in arriving at net sales in our Consolidated Statement of Operations.

We have substantially completed the acquisition integration and achieved cost savings through the Aurora Transaction. Through the Aurora Transaction, we have enhanced our existing product offerings and developed dozens of new offerings which we are in the process of launching. Despite the difficulties that necessitated us amending the financial covenants under our senior secured credit facilities, our focused strategy remains the same. This includes:

• capitalize on our diversified product portfolio;

• leverage our brand names for share leadership;

• expand the foodservice and private label businesses;

• expand the Vlasic and Duncan Hines brands in Canada;

• continue to achieve significant productivity improvements; and

• complete the integration and execute on our synergy opportunities.

The discussion below for each of the comparative periods is based upon net sales. We determine net sales in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. We calculate our net sales by deducting trade marketing, slotting and consumer coupon redemption expenses from shipments. “Shipments” means gross sales less cash discounts, returns and “non-marketing” allowances. We calculate gross sales by multiplying the published list price of each product by the number of units of that product sold.

38

Shipments is a non-GAAP financial measure. We include it in our management’s discussion and analysis because we believe that it is a relevant financial performance indicator for our company as it measures the increase or decrease in our revenues caused by shipping more or less physical case volume multiplied by our published list prices. It is also a measure used by our management to evaluate our revenue performance. This measure is not recognized in accordance with GAAP and should not be viewed as an alternative to GAAP measures of performance.

The following table reconciles shipments to net sales for the consolidated company, the frozen foods segment and the dry foods segment for the three and six month periods ended June 26, 2005 and June 27, 2004

For the three months ended,

	Consolidated				Frozen Foods				Dry Foods
	June 26,		June 27,		June 26,		June 27,		June 26,		June 27,
	2005		2004		2005		2004		2005		2004
Shipments	$	430.4	$	390.5	$	213.7	$	194.2	$	216.7	$	196.3
Less: Aggregate trade marketing and consumer coupon redemption expenses		120.4		102.3		58.3		49.7		62.1		52.6
Less: Slotting expense		3.4		4.0		0.3		1.6		3.1		2.4
Net sales	$	306.6	$	284.2	$	155.1	$	142.9	$	151.5	$	141.3

For the six months ended,

	Consolidated				Frozen Foods				Dry Foods
	June 26,		June 27,		June 26,		June 27,		June 26,		June 27,
	2005		2004		2005		2004		2005		2004
Shipments	$	894.5	$	594.3	$	485.3	$	324.8	$	409.2	$	269.5
Less: Aggregate trade marketing and consumer coupon redemption expenses		244.5		153.7		133.9		81.7		110.6		72.0
Less: Slotting expense		35.5		6.9		14.9		3.9		20.6		3.0
Net sales	$	614.5	$	433.7	$	336.5	$	239.2	$	278.0	$	194.5

Plant Consolidations

Omaha, Nebraska Production Facility

During the six months ended June 26, 2005, we recorded restructuring charges totaling $1.0 million pertaining to our decision to permanently close the Omaha, Nebraska production facility. In addition, during the transition year ended December 26, 2004 and fiscal 2004 ended July 31, 2004, we recorded restructuring charges totaling $3.9 million and $11.8 million, respectively. These charges are recorded as a component of Other expense (income), net in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The closure was part of our plan of consolidating and streamlining production activities after the Aurora merger. These charges were recorded in accordance with SFAS No. 112, “Employers Accounting for Postemployment Benefits”, SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment and Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” and SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities”. In determining such charges, we made certain estimates and judgments surrounding the amounts ultimately to be paid and received for the actions we have taken.

Production from the Omaha plant, which manufactured Swanson frozen entree retail products and frozen foodservice products, has been relocated to our Fayetteville, Arkansas and Jackson, Tennessee production facilities. Activities related to the final closure of the plant were completed in the first quarter of 2005 and resulted in the elimination of 411 positions.

39

In order to estimate the costs related to our restructuring efforts, management made its best estimates of the most likely expected outcomes of the significant activities to accomplish the restructuring. These estimates principally related to charges for asset impairment for the owned facility in Omaha, employee severance costs to be paid, and other plant shutdown and relocation costs. The most significant of these estimated costs related to the asset impairment of the Omaha facility, which was based upon the net book value of the assets that were not being transferred, less the cash flows from production until shutdown and a reasonable salvage value for the land, building and equipment to be sold. We initially recorded a charge of $7.4 million during fiscal 2004 for the impairment of these assets, which was our best estimate of the impairment charge at the time. We had planned to transfer equipment with a net book value of approximately $9.7 million to other production locations, primarily in Fayetteville, Arkansas and Jackson, Tennessee. Due to the delay in closing the Omaha plant and the need to have production up and running in the Fayetteville plant, we were unable to transfer certain equipment with a net book value of $6.2 million and instead incurred capital expenditures to purchase, build and modify the necessary equipment in Fayetteville. In addition to the impairment charge initially recorded in fiscal 2004, we evaluated the remaining property, plant and equipment as well as existing offers to sell the plant and equipment, and recorded an additional impairment charge of $2.6 million in the 21 weeks ended December 26, 2004.

The severance costs, which include continuation of employee benefits for salaried employees, total $2.6 million and were expensed in the first quarter of 2004. As of June 26, 2005, $2.5 million has been paid.

The estimated costs associated with transferring certain assets to the Fayetteville and Jackson facilities along with estimates of the costs necessary to shut down the Omaha facility are included in other restructuring costs as they are incurred. Through June 26, 2005, these costs have totaled $4.1 million. We anticipate that additional costs through completion of the program, which will be recorded in future periods, will approximate less than $0.1 million. These estimates, together with other estimates made by us in connection with the restructuring actions, may vary significantly from the actual results, depending in part on factors beyond our control. For example, proceeds received from the sale of the land and equipment will depend on our success in negotiating with buyers and the current real estate market in Omaha. We will review the status of our restructuring activities on a quarterly basis and, if appropriate, record changes in estimates to our restructuring obligations in our consolidated financial statements for such quarter based on management’s then-current estimates.

Erie, Pennsylvania Production Facility

During the six months ended June 26, 2005, we recorded restructuring charges totaling $0.7 million pertaining to our decision to permanently close the Erie, Pennsylvania production facility, which we anticipate will close by September 2005. The charges are recorded as a component of Other expense (income), net in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The closure was part of the Company’s continuing plan of streamlining production activities. These charges were recorded in accordance with SFAS No. 112, “Employers Accounting for Postemployment Benefits” and SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities”. In determining such charges, we made certain estimate and judgments surrounding the amounts ultimately to be paid and received for the actions we have taken.

Production from the Erie plant, which manufactures Mrs. Paul’s and Van de Kamp frozen seafood products and Aunt Jemima frozen breakfast products, will be relocated primarily to the Company’s Jackson, Tennessee production facility. Activities related to the closure of the plant are expected to be completed by the fourth quarter of 2005 and will result in the elimination of approximately 290 positions. Employee termination activities will commence in July 2005 and are expected to be completed in the third quarter of 2005.

In order to estimate the costs related to our restructuring efforts, management made its best estimates of the most likely expected outcomes of the significant activities to accomplish the restructuring. These estimates principally related to charges for employee severance and related costs to be paid and other plant shutdown and relocation costs. The employee related costs, which include severance and other benefits, total $0.6 million. None of these costs have been paid as of June 26, 2005.

The estimated costs associated with transferring certain assets to the Jackson facility along with estimates of the costs necessary to shut down the Erie facility are included in other restructuring costs as they are incurred. We anticipate that costs through completion of the program will approximate $3.6 million. Through June 26, 2005, less than $0.1 million has been expended. These estimates, together with other estimates made by us in connection with the restructuring actions, may vary significantly from the actual results, depending in part on factors beyond our control. For example, proceeds received from the sale of the land and equipment will depend on our success in negotiating with buyers and the current real estate market in Erie. We will review the status of our restructuring activities on a quarterly basis and, if appropriate, record changes in estimates to our restructuring obligations in our consolidated financial statements for such quarter based on management’s then-current estimates.

40

Mattoon, Illinois Production Facility

On April 21, 2005, the Company made and announced its decision effective May 9, 2005 to shutdown a bagel production line at its Mattoon, IL facility, which produces the Company’s Lender’s® Bagels. In connection with the shutdown of the production line, the Company will be terminating 28 full-time and 7 part-time employees. A portion of the assets that was used in the bagel line will be utilized in other production areas within the Company. In accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment and Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”, the Company incurred a non-cash charge of $0.9 million related to the asset impairment of the bagel line, which has been recorded as a component of Other expense (income), net in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the six months ended June 26, 2005. We expect that any costs associated with the removal of the assets would be offset from the proceeds received from the sale of those assets.

As of June 26, 2005, we had an accrued restructuring liability of $2.3 million, of which $0.3 million related to the Omaha plant shutdown, $0.6 million related to the Erie plant shutdown and the balance related to severance costs from the Aurora Transaction. We expect all of these costs to be paid during the next nine months.

Results of operations

Consolidated statements of operations

The following tables set forth statement of operations data expressed in dollars and as a percentage of net sales. In accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States (“GAAP”), the results for the three and six months ended June 27, 2004 only include the results of operations of the Aurora businesses from the date of acquisition, March 19, 2004, through the end of the period.

	Three months ended								Six months ended
	June 26,				June 27,				June 26,				June 27,
	2005				2004				2005				2004
Net sales	$	306.6	100.0	%	$	284.2	100.0	%	$	614.5	100.0	%	$	433.7		100.0	%
Costs and expenses
Cost of products sold		246.2	80.3	%		238.9	84.1	%		508.0	82.7	%		376.7		86.9	%
Marketing and selling expenses		22.0	7.2	%		23.5	8.3	%		53.0	8.6	%		41.7		9.6	%
Administrative expenses		10.1	3.3	%		14.1	5.0	%		22.5	3.7	%		24.5		5.6	%
Research and development expenses		0.9	0.3	%		1.1	0.4	%		2.0	0.3	%		1.8		0.4	%
Other expense (income), net		1.5	0.5	%		1.0	0.4	%		4.9	0.8	%		19.9		4.6	%
Total costs and expenses		280.7	91.6	%		278.6	98.0	%		590.4	96.1	%		464.6		107.1	%
Earnings (loss) before interest and taxes	$	25.9	8.4	%	$	5.6	2.0	%	$	24.1	3.9	%	$	(30.9	)	-7.1	%

41

	Three months ended						Six months ended
	June 26,			June 27,			June 26,			June 27,
	2005			2004			2005			2004
Net sales
Frozen foods	$	155.1		$	142.9		$	336.5		$	239.2
Dry foods		151.5			141.3			278.0			194.5
Total	$	306.6		$	284.2		$	614.5		$	433.7
Earnings (loss) before interest and taxes
Frozen foods	$	5.3		$	(4.7	)	$	0.6		$	(19.5	)
Dry foods		24.4			14.4			32.2			4.7
Unallocated corporate expenses		(3.8	)		(4.1	)		(8.7	)		(16.1	)
Total	$	25.9		$	5.6		$	24.1		$	(30.9	)
Depreciation and amortization
Frozen foods	$	9.4		$	8.9		$	14.5		$	12.0
Dry foods		3.3			4.7			6.8			6.4
Total	$	12.7		$	13.6		$	21.3		$	18.4

Three months ended June 26, 2005 compared to three months ended June 27, 2004

Net sales. Shipments in the three months ended June 26, 2005 were $430.4 million, an increase of $39.9 million, compared to shipments in the three months ended June 27, 2004 of $390.5 million. Net sales in the three months ended June 26, 2005 were $306.6 million, an increase of $22.4 million, compared to net sales in the three months ended June 27, 2004 of $284.2 million.

Frozen foods:Shipments in the three months ended June 26, 2005 were $213.7 million, an increase of $19.5 million, compared to shipments in the three months ended June 27, 2004 of $194.2 million. The change was driven by a $10.5 million increase in our Swanson product line sales, a $6.0 million increase in our Aunt Jemima product line sales, and a $5.6 million increase in our frozen seafood product line sales. Partially offsetting these increases was a $3.8 million decline in our Chef Choice product line sales. Aggregate trade and consumer coupon redemption expenses increased $7.3 million on the three months ended June 26, 2005. As a result, frozen foods net sales increased $12.2 million in the three months ended June 26, 2005. The net sales change was driven by a $7.5 million increase in our Swanson product line, a $5.6 million increase in our Aunt Jemima product line, and a $4.4 million increase in our seafood product lines. Partially offsetting these increases was a $4.0 million decline in our Celeste product line and a $3.4 million decline in our Chef Choice product line.

Dry foods:Shipments in the three months ended June 26, 2005 were $216.7 million, an increase of $20.4 million, compared to shipments in the three months ended June 27, 2004 of $196.3 million. The change was driven by a $15.4 million increase in our Duncan Hines product lines sales, a $2.4 million increase in our syrup product line sales, and a $1.0 million increase in our pickle product line sales. Aggregate trade and consumer coupon redemption expenses increased $10.2 million. As a result, dry foods net sales increased $10.2 million in the three months ended June 26, 2005. The net sales change was driven by a $5.6 million increase in our Duncan Hines product lines sales, a $1.7 million increase in our syrup product line sales, and a $1.4 million increase in our Open Pit product line sales.

Cost of products sold. Our cost of products sold was $246.2 million, or 80.3% of net sales in the three months ended June 26, 2005, versus cost of products sold of $238.9 million, or 84.1% of net sales in the three months ended June 27, 2004. Cost of products sold during the three months ended June 27, 2004 include additional costs of $4.0 million and $9.8 million related to post-Merger sales of inventories written up to fair value at the date of the Pinnacle Merger and the Aurora Transaction, respectively. Cost of products sold during the three months ended June 26, 2005 were impacted by the additional costs resulting from the reorganization of our warehousing network and the related movement of product to the new warehousing network. In addition to these costs, this percentage is also affected by changes in our aggregate trade (including the slotting mentioned above) and consumer coupon redemption expenses that are classified as reductions to net sales.

42

Marketing and selling expenses. Marketing and selling expenses were $22.0 million, or 7.2% of net sales, in the three months ended June 26, 2005 compared to $23.5 million, or 8.3% of net sales, in the three months ended June 27, 2004. The change was due to lower consumer marketing and selling commission expense.

Administrative expenses. Administrative expenses were $10.1 million in the three months ended June 26, 2005 compared to $14.1 million in the three months ended June 27, 2004. The principal driver of the $4.0 million decrease was higher overhead expense in the three months ended June 27, 2004 related to the continued operation of the Aurora headquarters office in St. Louis, which was closed in May 2004.

Research and development expenses. Research and development expenses were $0.9 million, or 0.3% of net sales, in the three months ended June 26, 2005 compared with $1.1 million, or 0.4% of net sales, in the three months ended June 27, 2004.

Other expense (income), net. Other expense was $1.5 million in the three months ended June 26, 2005 as compared to $1.0 million in the three months ended June 27, 2004. In the three months ended June 26, 2005, we recorded $0.4 million for plant consolidation expense, primarily related to the closure of our Omaha, Nebraska frozen food facility, as discussed above under Plant Consolidation. In addition, we recorded $1.2 million of amortization expense in the three months ended June 26, 2005 compared to $1.0 in the three months ended June 27, 2004. The increased amortization is related to the amortizable intangible assets acquired in the reacquisition of Duncan Hines distribution rights in Canada.

Earnings (loss) before interest and taxes. Earnings (loss) before interest and taxes (EBIT) increased $20.3 million to $25.9 million in the three months ended June 26, 2005 from $5.6 million in EBIT in the three months ended June 27, 2004. This increase resulted from a $10.0 million increase in frozen foods EBIT, a $10.0 million increase in dry foods EBIT, and a $0.3 million decrease in unallocated corporate expenses.

Frozen foods:Frozen foods EBIT increased by $10.0 million in the three months ended June 26, 2005. This increase was net of $4.2 million of accelerated depreciation expense related to the closure of the Erie, Pennsylvania frozen food facility in the second quarter of 2005 and a charge of $0.4 million related to the plant consolidation expense from the closure of the Omaha, Nebraska and Erie, Pennsylvania frozen foods facilities in the second quarter of 2005. The results for the three months ended June 27, 2004 include additional costs of products sold of $4.5 million related to post-acquisition sales of inventories written up to fair value at the date of the Aurora Transaction, and $3.3 million of accelerated depreciation expense related to the closure of the Omaha, Nebraska frozen food facility. Additionally, the corporate overhead expense allocated to frozen foods was $1.5 million higher for the three months ended June 27, 2004, related to the continued operation of the Aurora headquarters office in St. Louis, which was closed in May 2004. The balance of our frozen foods EBIT increased $5.3 million, primarily due to a 10% increase in cases sold in the frozen foods segment. The increase in sales volume was partially offset by increased cost of products sold expense related to the reorganization of our warehousing network, and increased trade and coupon promotion expenses.

Dry foods:Dry foods EBIT increased $10.0 million in the three months ended June 26, 2005. The three months ended June 27, 2004 include additional costs of $4.0 million and $5.4 million related to post-Merger sales of inventories written up to fair value at the date of the Pinnacle Merger and the Aurora Transaction, respectively. Additionally, the corporate overhead expense allocated to dry foods was $1.4 million higher for the three months ended June 27, 2004, related to the continued operation of the Aurora headquarters office in St. Louis, which was closed in May 2004. The balance of the Dry foods EBIT decreased $0.8 million, primarily due to increased trade promotion and advertising expenses and increased cost of products sold expense related to the reorganization of our warehousing network and increased slotting and trade promotion expenses. Partially offsetting these costs were increased sales volume, resulting from additional case volume in our Duncan Hines product line.

Interest expense, net. Interest expense, net was $20.7 million in the three months ended June 26, 2005, compared to $8.2 million in the three months ended June 27, 2004. The increase in our interest expense during the three months ended June 26, 2005 relates to higher average interest rates on our senior debt as well as mark to market adjustments on our interest rate swaps. We utilize interest rate swap agreements to reduce the potential exposure to interest rate movements and to achieve a desired proportion of variable versus fixed rate debt. Any gains or losses realized on the interest rate swap agreements are recorded as an adjustment to interest expense. During the three months ended June 26, 2005, we recorded a loss on the interest rate swap contracts totaling $2.5 million. During the three months ended June 27, 2004, we recorded a gain on the value of the interest rate swaps totaling $6.8 million.

43

Provision for income taxes.The effective tax rate was 142.2% in the three months ended June 26, 2005, compared to (243.6%) in the three months ended June 27, 2004. We maintain a full valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets excluding indefinite lived intangible assets, and the effective rate difference is primarily due to the change in the valuation allowance for the three month period. Deferred tax liabilities are recognized for the differences between the book and tax bases of certain goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets. A deferred tax charge was recorded this three month period for amortization recognized for tax purposes related to indefinite lived intangibles.

Under Internal Revenue Code Section 382, Aurora is a loss corporation. Section 382 of the Code places limitations on our ability to use Aurora’s net operating loss carry forward to offset our income. The annual net operating loss limitation is approximately $13-15 million subject to other rules and restrictions.

Six months ended June 26, 2005 compared to six months ended June 27, 2004

Net sales. Shipments in the six months ended June 26, 2005 were $894.5 million, an increase of $300.2 million, compared to shipments in the six months ended June 27, 2004 of $594.3 million. $255.4 million of the increase was related to the shipments of products acquired in the Aurora Transaction. Net sales in the six months ended June 26, 2005 were $614.5 million, an increase of $180.8 million, compared to net sales in the six months ended June 27, 2004 of $433.7 million, $167.2 million of the increase was related to the products acquired in the Aurora Transaction, whose brands required a higher level of trade spending than the historical Pinnacle brands.

Frozen foods:Shipments in the six months ended June 26, 2005 were $485.3 million, an increase of $160.5 million. $137.0 million of the increase was related to products acquired in the Aurora Transaction. The balance of the change was driven by increases in our Swanson, Aunt Jemima, and seafood product line sales. Aggregate trade and consumer coupon redemption expenses increased $63.2 million, of which $47.1 million of the increase related to the products acquired in the Aurora Transaction. As a result, frozen foods net sales increased $97.3 million, with $90.0 million related to the products acquired in the Aurora Transaction. The balance of the change was driven by increases in our Aunt Jemima, seafood, and Swanson product line sales.

Dry foods:Shipments in the six months ended June 26, 2005 were $409.2 million, an increase of $139.7 million. $113.6 million of the increase was related to products acquired in the Aurora Transaction. The balance of the change was driven by increases in our Duncan Hines, pickle, and syrup product line sales. Aggregate trade and consumer coupon redemption expenses increased $56.2 million, of which $38.9 million related to products acquired in the Aurora Transaction. As a result, dry foods net sales increased $83.5 million, of which $74.7 million was related to products acquired in the Aurora Transaction. The balance of the change was driven by increases in our Duncan Hines and syrup product line sales.

Cost of products sold. Our cost of products sold was $508.0 million, or 82.7% of net sales in the six months ended June 26, 2005, versus cost of products sold of $376.7 million, or 86.9% of net sales in the six months ended June 27, 2004. The products acquired in the Aurora Transaction resulted in an additional $127.8 million of cost of products sold in the six months ended June 26, 2005. Cost of products sold during the six months ended June 27, 2004 include additional costs of $18.1 million and $13.0 million related to post-Merger sales of inventories written up to fair value at the date of the Pinnacle Merger and the Aurora Transaction, respectively. Cost of products sold during the six months ended June 26, 2005 were impacted by the additional costs resulting from the reorganization of our warehousing network and the related movement of product to the new warehousing network. In addition to these costs, this percentage is also affected by changes in our aggregate trade and consumer coupon redemption expenses that are classified as reductions to net sales.

Marketing and selling expenses. Marketing and selling expenses were $53.0 million, or 8.6% of net sales, in the six months ended June 26, 2005 compared to $41.7 million, or 9.6% of net sales, in the six months ended June 27, 2004. The business acquired through the Aurora Transaction contributed an additional $20.8 million of costs for the six months ended June 26, 2005. The balance of the change was due to decreased selling and marketing overhead expense and lower advertising expense.

Administrative expenses. Administrative expenses were $22.5 million in the six months ended June 26, 2005 compared to $24.5 million in the six months ended June 27, 2004. The higher cost in the six months ended June 27, 2004 relate to the continued operation of the Aurora headquarters office in St. Louis, which was closed in May 2004.

Research and development expenses. Research and development expenses were $2.0 million, or 0.3% of net sales, in the six months ended June 26, 2005 compared with $1.8 million, or 0.4% of net sales, in the six months ended June 27, 2004.

44

Other expense (income), net. Other expense was $4.9 million in the six months ended June 26, 2005 as compared to $19.9 million in the six months ended June 27, 2004. Included in other expense (income), net for the six months ended June 27, 2004 was $8.8 million of Pinnacle Merger related expenses, consisting primarily of $7.4 million of non-cash equity related compensation expense and $1.4 million of retention benefits payments as well as $10.0 million related to the closure of our Omaha, Nebraska frozen food facility. For the six months ended June 26, 2005, restructuring and impairment charges totaled $2.6 million and consisted of $0.6 million of costs related to the closure of our Erie, Pennsylvania frozen food facility, a $0.9 million asset impairment charge for the shutdown of a production line at our Mattoon, Illinois facility, and $1.0 million of plant consolidation expense related to the closure of our Omaha, Nebraska frozen food facility, all of which are discussed above under Plant Consolidation. In addition, $2.4 million of amortization expense was incurred in the six months ended June 26, 2005 compared to $1.1 in the six months ended June 27, 2004. The increased amortization was primarily related to the amortizable intangible assets acquired in the Aurora Transaction.

Earnings (loss) before interest and taxes. Earnings (loss) before interest and taxes (EBIT) increased $55.0 million to $24.1 million in the six months ended June 26, 2005 from a loss of $30.9 million in EBIT in the six months ended June 27, 2004. This increase resulted from a $20.1 million increase in frozen foods EBIT, a $27.5 million increase in dry foods EBIT, and a $7.4 million decrease in unallocated corporate expenses. The decrease in the unallocated corporate expenses was principally related to $8.8 million of Pinnacle Merger related expenses in the six months ended June 27, 2004, consisting primarily of $7.4 million of non-cash equity related compensation expense and $1.4 million of retention benefit payments. For the six months ended June 26, 2005 there was a $1.4 million increase in overhead expense related to the merger of the Aurora businesses.

Frozen foods:Frozen foods EBIT increased by $20.1 million in the six months ended June 26, 2005 and includes $5.2 million related to the business acquired in the Aurora Transaction. In the first six months of 2005 we recorded $4.2 million of accelerated depreciation expense related to the closure of the Erie, Pennsylvania frozen food facility and a charge of $1.7 million related to the plant consolidation expense from the closure of the Omaha, Nebraska ($1.0 million) and Erie, Pennsylvania ($0.7 million) frozen foods facilities. Additionally, a $0.9 million asset impairment write down for the shutdown of a production line at our Mattoon, Illinois facility was recorded in the first six months of 2005. The six months ended June 27, 2004 include additional costs of $1.2 million related to post-Merger sales of inventories written up to fair value at the date of the Pinnacle Merger. The increase in EBIT also includes the impact of the $5.8 million charge recorded in the six months ended June 27, 2004 related to post-acquisition sales of inventories written up to fair value at the date of the Aurora Transaction, which includes $1.3 million in the first quarter and $4.5 million in the second quarter. Additionally, the results for the six months ended June 27, 2004 included a charge of $10.0 million related to the closure of the Omaha, Nebraska frozen foods facility as well as $3.3 million of accelerated depreciation expense related to the closure of the Omaha facility. Additionally, the corporate overhead expense allocated to frozen foods was $1.5 million higher for the six months ended June 27, 2004, related to the continued operation of the Aurora headquarters office in St. Louis, which was closed in May 2004. The balance of our frozen foods EBIT decreased $0.1 million, resulting from an increase in sales volume offset by increased cost of products sold expense related to the reorganization of our warehousing network, and increased slotting and trade promotion expenses.

Dry foods:Dry foods EBIT increased $27.5 million in the six months ended June 26, 2005 and includes $9.9 million related to the business acquired in the Aurora Transaction. The increase in EBIT also includes the impact of the $7.2 million charge recorded in the six months ended June 27, 2004 related to post-acquisition sales of inventories written up to fair value at the date of the Aurora Transaction, which includes $1.8 million in the first quarter and $5.4 million in the second quarter. The six months ended June 27, 2004 also includes additional cost of products sold of $17.0 million related to post-Merger sales of inventories written up to fair value at the date of the Pinnacle Merger. Additionally, the corporate overhead expense allocated to dry foods was $1.4 million higher for the six months ended June 27, 2004, related to the continued operation of the Aurora headquarters office in St. Louis, which was closed in May 2004. The balance of the Dry foods EBIT decreased $8.0 million, primarily due to increased cost of products sold expense related to the reorganization of our warehousing network and increased slotting and trade promotion expenses. Partially offsetting these costs were increased sales volume, resulting from additional case volume in our Duncan Hines and pickles product lines.

45

Interest expense, net. Interest expense, net was $34.9 million in the six months ended June 26, 2005, compared to $17.7 million in the six months ended June 27, 2004. The increase in interest expense, net is partially related to the change in capital structure, which occurred as a result of the Aurora Transaction. In addition, we experienced higher average interest rates on our senior debt as well as mark to market adjustments on our interest rate swaps. We utilize interest rate swap agreements to reduce the potential exposure to interest rate movements and to achieve a desired proportion of variable versus fixed rate debt. Any gains or losses realized on the interest rate swap agreements are recorded as an adjustment to interest expense. During the six months ended June 26, 2005, we recorded a gain on the interest rate swap contracts totaling $1.4 million. During the six months ended June 27, 2004, we recorded a gain on the value of the interest rate swaps totaling $6.8 million.

Provision for income taxes.The effective tax rate was (128.5%) in the six months ended June 26, 2005, compared to (0.2%) in the six months ended June 27, 2004. We maintain a full valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets excluding indefinite lived intangible assets, and the effective rate difference is primarily due to the change in the valuation allowance for the six month period. Deferred tax liabilities are recognized for the differences between the book and tax bases of certain goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets. A deferred tax charge was recorded this six month period for amortization recognized for tax purposes related to indefinite lived intangibles.

Seasonality

We experience seasonality in our sales and cash flows. Sales of frozen foods, including seafood, tend to be marginally higher during the winter months, whereas sales of pickles, relishes and barbecue sauces tend to be higher in the spring and summer months and demand for Duncan Hines products tend to be higher around the Easter, Thanksgiving and Christmas holidays. We pack the majority of our pickles during a season extending from May through September and also increase our seafood and Duncan Hines inventories at that time in advance of the selling season. As a result, our inventory levels are higher during August, September and October, and thus we require more working capital during those months. We are a seasonal net user of cash in the third quarter of the calendar year, which may require us to draw on the revolving credit commitments under our senior credit facilities.

Liquidity and capital resources

Historical

Our cash flows are very seasonal. Typically we are a net user of cash in the third quarter of the calendar year and a net generator of cash over the balance of the year.

Our principal liquidity requirements have been, and we expect will be, for working capital and general corporate purposes, including capital expenditures and debt service. Capital expenditures are expected to be approximately $27 million in 2005. We have historically satisfied our liquidity requirements with internally generated cash flows and availability under our revolving credit facilities.

Statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 26, 2005

Net cash provided by operating activities was $22.8 million and $23.8 million for the six months ended June 26, 2005 and June 27, 2004, respectively. Net cash provided by operating activities during the six months ended June 26, 2005 was principally the result net earnings excluding non-cash items, $12.0 million, as well as a decrease in working capital. The decrease in working capital included a $39.1 million decrease in inventory that was a result of the sell down of the seasonal build from December 2004. The cash provided by the reduction in inventory levels was offset by a $25.8 million decrease in accounts payable. In the six months ended June 27, 2004, net cash provided by operations was driven by a $38.4 million decrease in working capital, principally related to the seasonal decrease in inventories and higher accounts payable.

Net cash used in investing activities was $10.1 million and $685.0 million for the six months ended June 26, 2005 and June 27, 2004, respectively. Net cash used in investing activities during the six months ended June 26, 2005 includes $12.3 million for capital expenditures less $1.6 million received from the settlement of the working capital adjustment from the Pinnacle Merger as well as $0.6 million related to the sale of idle equipment from our Omaha facility. Net cash used in investing activities during the six months ended June 27, 2004 includes activities related to the Aurora Transaction, mainly consideration paid of $663.8 million and transaction costs of $13.2 million. Additionally, $7.4 million for capital expenditures was included in the six months ended June 27, 2004.

46

Net cash used by financing activities was $1.7 million for the six months ended June 26, 2005. The usage was driven primarily by the scheduled quarterly payments of our senior term loan credit facility of $2.7 million and a $0.3 million decline in bank overdrafts. The usage was offset by borrowings of short term notes payable totaling $1.4 million (net). Net cash provided by financing activities was $703.2 million during the six months ended June 27, 2004, which was primarily related to the Aurora Transaction and included $425.0 million in proceeds from the senior credit facility, $201.0 million in senior subordinated note proceeds, and $95.3 million in equity contributions. The proceeds were offset by $16.7 million in debt acquisition costs and $14.0 million for repayments of borrowings under our revolving credit facility.

The net of all activities resulted in an increase in cash of $11.0 million and $42.0 million during the six months ended June 26, 2005 and June 27, 2004, respectively.

Debt

In November 2003, we entered into a $675.0 million credit agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank (a related party of JPMP) and other financial institutions as lenders, which provides for a $545.0 million seven-year term loan B facility, of which $120.0 million was made available on November 25, 2003 and $425.0 million was made available as a delayed draw term loan on the closing date of the Aurora Transaction. The term loan matures November 25, 2010. The senior secured credit facility also provides for a six-year $130.0 million revolving credit facility, of which up to $65.0 million was made available on November 25, 2003, and the remaining $65.0 million was made available on the closing date of the Aurora Transaction. The revolving credit facility expires November 25, 2009. There were no borrowings outstanding under the revolver as of June 26, 2005 and December 26, 2004.

As of June 26, 2005, $10.8 million of our Senior Secured Credit Facility was due to JPMorgan Chase Bank. There was no related party debt as of December 26, 2004.

Subject to the Senior Credit Agreement Amendment, which is discussed below, our borrowings under the senior secured credit facilities bear interest at a floating rate and are maintained as base rate loans or as Eurodollar loans. Base rate loans bear interest at the base rate plus the applicable base rate margin, as defined in the senior secured credit facilities. Base rate is defined as the higher of (i) the prime rate and (ii) the Federal Reserve reported overnight funds rate plus 1/2 of 1%. Eurodollar loans bear interest at the adjusted Eurodollar rate, as described in the senior secured credit facilities, plus the applicable Eurodollar rate margin.

The applicable margins with respect to our term loan facility and our revolving credit facility will vary from time to time in accordance with the terms thereof and agreed upon pricing grids based on our leverage ratio as defined in our senior secured credit facilities. The initial applicable margin with respect to the term loan facility and the revolving credit facility is:

• In the case of base rate loans: 1.75% for the term loan and 1.75% for the revolving credit facility.

• In the case of Eurodollar loans: 2.75% for the term loan and 2.75% for the revolving credit facility.

The range of margins for the revolving credit facility is:

• In the case of base rate loans: 1.25% to 1.75%.

• In the case of Eurodollar loans: 2.25% to 2.75%.

A commitment fee of 0.50% per annum applies to the unused portion of the revolving loan facility and 1.25% per annum applied to the delayed-draw term loan until it became available for the Aurora Transaction. For the three and six months ended June 26, 2005, the weighted average interest rate on the term loan was 6.3251% and 6.0218%, respectively. For the six months ended June 26, 2005, the weighted average interest rate on the revolving credit facility was 6.2530%. There were no borrowings under the revolving credit facility during the three months ended June 26, 2005. As of June 26, 2005, the Eurodollar interest rate on the term loan facility was 6.3477% and the commitment fee on the undrawn revolving credit facility was 0.50%. For the three and six months ended June 27, 2004, the weighted average interest rate on the term loan was 4.1282% and 4.1134%, respectively. For the six months ended June 26, 2005, the weighted average interest rate on the revolving credit facility was 3.8886%. There were no borrowings under the revolving credit facility during the three months ended June 27, 2004. As of June 27, 2004, the Eurodollar interest rate on the term loan facility was 4.2591% and the commitment fee on the undrawn revolving credit facility was 0.50%.

47

The term loan facility matures in quarterly 0.25% installments from June 30, 2004 through December 31, 2009, with the remaining balance due in 2010 and the revolving credit facility terminates on November 25, 2009. The aggregate maturities of the term loan outstanding as of June 26, 2005 are: $2.7 million in the remainder of 2005, $5.5 million in 2006, $5.5 million in 2007, $5.5 million in 2008, $5.5 million in 2009 and $515.0 million thereafter.

The obligations under the senior secured credit facilities are unconditionally and irrevocably guaranteed by each of our direct or indirect domestic subsidiaries (collectively, the “Guarantors”). In addition, the senior secured credit facilities are collateralized by first priority or equivalent security interests in (i) all the capital stock of, or other equity interests in, each of our direct or indirect domestic subsidiaries and 65% of the capital stock of, or other equity interests in, each of our direct foreign subsidiaries, or any of our domestic subsidiaries and (ii) certain tangible and intangible assets of the Company and the Guarantors (subject to certain exceptions and qualifications).

We pay a commission on the face amount of all outstanding letters of credit drawn under the senior secured credit facilities at a per annum rate equal to the Applicable Margin then in effect with respect to Eurodollar loans under the revolving credit loan facility minus the fronting fee (as defined). A fronting fee equal to 1/4% per annum on the face amount of each letter of credit is payable quarterly in arrears to the issuing lender for its own account. We also pay a per annum fee equal to 1/2% on the undrawn portion of the commitments in respect of the revolving credit facility. Total letters of credit issuable under the facilities cannot exceed $40.0 million. As of June 26, 2005 and December 26, 2004, there were no outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility and we had utilized $10.5 million and $15.7 million, respectively, for letters of credit. Of the $130.0 million revolving credit facility available, as of June 26, 2005 and December 26, 2004, we had an unused balance of $119.5 million and $114.3 million, respectively, available for future borrowings and letters of credit, of which a maximum of $29.5 million and $24.3 million, respectively, may be used for letters of credit.

In November 2003, the Successor issued $200.0 million 8¹/4% senior subordinated notes. On February 20, 2004, the Successor issued an additional $194.0 million of 8¹/4% senior subordinated notes, which resulted in gross proceeds of $201.0 million, including premium. The terms of the February 2004 notes are the same as the November 2003 notes and are issued under the same indenture. The Notes are general unsecured obligations of the Company, subordinated in right of payment to all existing and future senior indebtedness of the Company, and guaranteed on a full, unconditional, joint and several basis by the Company’s wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries. See Note 16 for Guarantor and Nonguarantor Financial Statements.

We may redeem all or a portion of the notes prior to December 1, 2008, at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes plus a “make-whole” premium (the greater of: (1) 1% of the then outstanding principal amount of the note; and (2) the excess of: (a) the present value at such redemption date of (i) the redemption price of the note at December 1, 2008 plus (ii) plus all required interest payments due on the note through December 1, 2008, computed using a discount rate equal to the Treasury Rate as of such redemption date plus 50 basis points; over (b) the then outstanding principal amount of the note, if greater). On or after December 1, 2008, we may redeem some or all of the notes at the redemption prices listed below, if redeemed during the twelve-month period beginning on December 1 of the years indicated below:

Year	Percentage
2008		104.125	%
2009		102.750	%
2010		101.375	%
2011 and thereafter		100.000	%

At any time prior to December 1, 2006, we may redeem up to 35% of the original aggregate principal amount of the notes with the net cash proceeds of certain equity offerings at a redemption price equal to 108.250% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, so long as (a) at least 65% of the original aggregate amount of the notes remains outstanding after each such redemption and (b) any such redemption by us is made within 90 days of such equity offering.

If a change of control occurs (as defined in the indenture pursuant to which the notes were issued), and unless we have exercised our right to redeem all of the notes as described above, the note holders will have the right to require the Successor to repurchase all or a portion of the notes at a purchase price in cash equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase.

48

The notes include a provision that the Company would file with the SEC on or prior to August 21, 2004 a registration statement relating to an offer to exchange the notes for an issue of SEC-registered notes with terms identical to the notes and use its reasonable best effort to cause such registration statement to become effective on or prior to October 20, 2004. Since the exchange offer was not completed before November 19, 2004, the annual interest rate borne by the notes increased by 1.0% per annum until the exchange offer was completed, which occurred on February 1, 2005. As of this date, the Company was no longer paying the additional interest.

Our senior secured credit facilities and the notes contain a number of covenants that, among other things, limit, subject to certain exceptions, our ability to incur additional liens and indebtedness, make capital expenditures, engage in certain transactions with affiliates, repay other indebtedness (including the notes), make certain distributions, make acquisitions and investments, loans or advances, engage in mergers or consolidations, liquidations and dissolutions and joint ventures, sell assets, make dividends, amend certain material agreements governing our indebtedness, enter into guarantees and other contingent obligations and other matters customarily restricted in similar agreements. In addition to scheduled periodic repayments, we are also required to make mandatory repayments of the loans under the senior secured credit facilities with a portion of excess cash flow, as defined. In addition, our senior secured credit facilities contain, among others, the following financial covenants: a maximum total leverage ratio, a minimum interest coverage ratio and a maximum capital expenditure limitation. See the discussion below regarding the amendment to the senior credit agreement where these covenants have been adjusted.

Senior Credit Agreement Amendment

On September 14, 2004, the Company was first in default under its senior secured credit facilities. On November 4, 2004 the Company received required lender approval to temporarily waive defaults under the Company’s senior secured credit facility arising due to (i) failure to furnish on a timely basis the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2004, the Company’s annual budget for fiscal year 2005 and other related deliverables and (ii) failure to comply with the maximum total leverage ratio for the period ended October 31, 2004. Conditions of the waiver limited the Company’s access to the revolving credit facility through the addition of an anti-cash hoarding provision which required that at the time of a borrowing request, cash, as defined, could not exceed $10 million and limited total outstanding borrowings under the facility to $65 million. The amendment and waiver expired November 24, 2004.

On November 19, 2004 the Company received required lender approval to permanently waive the defaults mentioned above and amend the financial covenants for future reporting periods. The terms of the permanent amendment and waiver include:

• delivery of July 31, 2004 fiscal year end financial statements on or prior to the effective date of the amendment;

• a 50 basis point increase to the applicable rate, as defined, with respect to borrowings under the credit agreement;

• a change in the definition of consolidated cash interest expense to exclude non-cash gains or losses arising from marking interest rate swap agreements to market;

• the addition of a senior covenant leverage ratio, as defined, which ranges from a ratio of 3.75 to 1.00 to a ratio of 5.75 to 1.00 through December 2005;

• amendment of the interest expense coverage ratio (ranging from a ratio of 1.50 to 1.00 to a ratio of 2.10 to 1.00 through December 2005) and suspends the maximum total leverage ratio until March 2006;

• elimination of limitation on revolving credit exposures;

• and the following limitations, restrictions and additional reporting requirements during the amendment period which ends on the second business day following the date on which the Company delivers to the Administrative Agent financial statements for the fiscal quarter ending March 2006:

• prohibit incremental extensions of credit, as defined;

• additional limitations on indebtedness;

• limitations on acquisitions and investments;

• additional limitations on restricted payments;

• suspension of payments for management fees;

• continuation of the anti-cash hoarding provision;

• monthly financial reporting requirements, and;

• a Company election to early terminate the amendment period.

None of the above terms are expected to impact the Company’s ability to meet the financial targets set forth in the bank amendment.

49

As of June 26, 2005, the Company was in compliance with the amended and added covenants as listed above.

Based on current estimates, we believe that the Company will meet the financial targets set forth in the bank amendment and, as such, will maintain compliance with debt covenant requirements for at least the next 12 months.

In addition to the debt instruments discussed above, we entered into a short term notes payable agreement during the second quarter of 2005 for the financing of our annual insurance premiums. As of June 26, 2005, the balance of the notes payable totaled $1,449.

Inflation

Inflation has not had a significant effect on us. We have been successful in mitigating the effects of inflation with aggressive cost reduction and productivity programs. Although we have no such expectation, severe increases in inflation, however, could affect the North American economies and could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment (Revised 2004).” This statement addresses the accounting for share-based payment transactions in which a company receives employee services in exchange for the company’s equity instruments or liabilities that are based on the fair value of the company’s equity securities or may be settled by the issuance of these securities. SFAS 123R eliminates the ability to account for share-based compensation using APB 25 and generally requires that such transactions be accounted for using a fair value method. The provisions of this statement are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2005 and will become effective for the Company beginning in 2006. Alternative transition methods are allowed under Statement No. 123R. While the Company has not yet determined the transition method to use, adequate disclosure of all comparative periods covered by the financial statements will comply with the requirements of FASB 123R.

In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs—an Amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4.” This statement clarifies the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and spoilage, requiring these items be recognized as current-period charges. In addition, this statement requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. The provisions of this statement are effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005 and will become effective for the Company beginning in 2006. The Company is assessing what impact, if any, adoption of this statement would have on its financial statements.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets—an amendment to APB Opinion No. 29.” This statement amends APB 29 to eliminate the exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. A nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. The provisions of this statement are effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company is assessing what impact, if any, adoption of this statement would have on its financial statements.

In March 2005, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143 (FIN 47). FIN 47 clarifies that the term “conditional asset retirement obligation” as used in FASB Statement No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, refers to a legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and (or) method of settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. FIN 47 is effective no later than the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. The effect of adopting FIN 47 on the Company’s financial position and results of operations has not yet been determined.

50

ITEM 3: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

Financial Instruments

We may utilize derivative financial instruments to enhance our ability to manage risks, including, but not limited to, interest rate and foreign currency, which exist as part of ongoing business operations. We do not enter into contracts for speculative purposes, nor are we a party to any leveraged derivative instrument. We monitor the use of derivative financial instruments through regular communication with senior management and the utilization of written guidelines.

We rely primarily on bank borrowings to meet our funding requirements. We utilize interest rate swap agreements or other derivative instruments to reduce the potential exposure to interest rate movements and to achieve a desired proportion of variable versus fixed rate debt. We recognize the amounts that we pay or receive on hedges related to debt as an adjustment to interest expense.

As the start of the current year, we are party to four interest rate swap agreements with counterparties, including JP Morgan Chase Bank (a related party) that effectively changes the floating rate payments on our Senior Secured Credit Facility into fixed rate payments. The first swap agreement became effective April 26, 2004, terminated December 31, 2004 and had a notional amount of $545.0 million; the second swap agreement commenced January 4, 2005, terminates on January 3, 2006 and has a notional amount of $450.0 million; the third swap agreement commences January 3, 2006, terminates on January 2, 2007 and has a notional amount of $100.0 million, and the fourth swap agreement commences on January 3, 2006, terminates on January 2, 2007 and has a notional amount of $250.0 million. Interest payments determined under each swap agreement are based on these notional amounts, which match or are expected to match the Company’s outstanding borrowings under the Senior Secured Credit Facility during the periods that each interest rate swap is outstanding. Floating interest rate payments to be received under each swap are based on U.S. Dollar LIBOR, which is the same basis for determining the floating rate payments on the Senior Secured Credit Facility. The fixed interest rate payments that the Company will pay under the swap agreements are determined using the following approximate fixed interest rates: 1.39% for the swap terminated on December 31, 2004; 2.25% for the swap terminating January 1, 2006; and 3.75% for two swaps terminating January 2, 2007.

These swaps were not designated as hedges pursuant to SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” As of June 26, 2005 and December 26, 2004, the fair value of the interest rate swaps was a gain of $4.6 million and $3.8 million, respectively. At June 26, 2005, $4.1 million was recorded in Other current assets and $0.5 million was recorded in Other assets, net in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Of the amount at December 26, 2004, $0.2 million is recorded in Other current assets, while $3.6 million was recorded in Other assets, net in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. During the three and six months ended June 26, 2005, we realized in cash a gain on the interest rate swaps of $0.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively, which is recorded as a decrease to interest expense. Additionally, we recognized a non-cash loss during the three months ended June 26, 2005 totaling $2.9 million and a non-cash gain during the six months ended June 26, 2005 totaling $0.9 million. The non cash gains and losses are recognized as an adjustment to interest expense, net in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

In August and September 2004, we entered into natural gas swap transactions with JP Morgan Chase Bank (a related party) to lower our exposure to the price of natural gas. The agreements became effective beginning on August 1, 2004, terminate between February 2005 and December 2005, and have various notional quantities of MMBTU’s per month. We will pay a fixed price per MMBTU, which range from $5.93 to $6.99 per MMBTU, depending on the month, with settlements monthly. This swap was not designed as a hedge pursuant to SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.”

As of June 26, 2005 and December 26, 2004, the fair value of the remaining natural gas swap transactions was a gain of $0.3 million and $0.1 million, respectively, which is recorded in Other current assets. During the three and six months ended June 26, 2005, we realized in cash a gain of $0.1 million and a loss of less than $0.1 million, respectively, on the natural gas swaps, which is recorded as an increase to cost of products sold. Additionally, we recognized a non-cash loss during the three months ended June 26, 2005 totaling $0.1 million and a non-cash gain during the six months ended June 26, 2005 totaling $0.2 million. The non-cash gains and losses are recognized as an adjustment to cost of products sold in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

51

On March 10, 2005, we entered into foreign currency exchange transactions with JP Morgan Chase Bank (a related party) to lower our exposure to the exchange rates between the U.S. and Canadian dollar. Each agreement is based upon a notional amount in Canadian dollars, which is expected to approximate the amount of our Canadian subsidiary’s U.S. denominated purchases for the month, and the agreements run through December 2005. We will pay a fixed exchange rate of 1.2062 Canadian dollars per U.S. dollar, with settlements monthly. This swap was not designed as a hedge pursuant to SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.”

As of June 26, 2005, the fair value of the remaining foreign exchange swaps was a gain of $0.2 million, which is recorded in Other current assets. For the three and six months ended June 26, 2005, we realized in cash a gain of $0.2 million and $0.2 million, respectively, on the foreign exchange swaps, which is recorded as a reduction to cost of products sold. Additionally, we recognized non-cash gains during the three and six months ended June 26, 2005 totaling $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively. The non-cash gains and losses are recognized as an adjustment to cost of products sold in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

We utilize irrevocable standby letters of credit with one-year renewable terms to satisfy workers’ compensation self-insurance security deposit requirements. The contract value of the outstanding standby letter of credit as of June 26, 2005 was $8.1 million, which approximates fair value. As of June 26, 2005, we also utilized letters of credit in connection with the purchase of raw materials in the amount of $2.4 million, which approximates fair value.

We are exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the other parties to derivative financial instruments. All counterparties are at least “A” rated by Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s. Accordingly, we do not anticipate non-performance by the counterparties.

The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value. The estimated fair value of the Senior Secured Credit Facilities bank debt that is classified as long term debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 26, 2005, was approximately its carrying value.

Raw materials, ingredients, packaging and production costs

We purchase agricultural products, meat, poultry, other raw materials and packaging supplies from growers, commodity processors, other food companies and packaging manufacturers using a combination of purchase orders and various short- and long-term supply arrangements.

In August and September 2004, we entered into natural gas swap transactions with a counterparty to lower our exposure to the price of natural gas. The agreements became effective beginning on August 1, 2004, terminate between February 2005 and December 2005, and have various notional quantities of MMBTU’s per month. We will pay a fixed price per MMBTU, which range from $5.93 to $6.99 per MMBTU, depending on the month, with settlements monthly. This swap was not designed as a hedge pursuant to SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.”

As of June 26, 2005 and December 26, 2004, the fair value of the remaining natural gas swap transactions was a gain of $0.3 million and $0.1 million, respectively, which is recorded in Other current assets. During the three and six months ended June 26, 2005, we realized in cash a gain of $0.1 million and a loss of less than $0.1 million, respectively, on the natural gas swaps, which is recorded as an increase to cost of products sold. Additionally, we recognized a non-cash loss during the three months ended June 26, 2005 totaling $0.1 million and a non-cash gain during the six months ended June 26, 2005 totaling $0.2 million. The non-cash gains and losses are recognized as an adjustment to cost of products sold in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

While all of our materials are available from numerous independent suppliers, raw materials are subject to fluctuations in price attributable to a number of factors, including changes in crop size, federal and state agricultural programs, export demand, weather conditions during the growing and harvesting seasons, insects, plant diseases and fungi. Although we enter into advance commodities purchase agreements from time to time, increases in raw material costs could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. We do not engage in speculative transactions nor hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes.

52

ITEM 4: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. Our management, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as of June 26, 2005. Based upon our evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to accomplish their objectives.

In addition, there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting or in other factors that occurred during the quarter ended June 26, 2005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

53

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

PFGI’s Fleming bankruptcy claim

PFGI, on or about April 1, 2003, filed a reclamation claim against Fleming, a customer, in Flemings’ bankruptcy proceeding pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware in the amount of $964,000. Fleming has claimed that the products in controversy had been commingled with other products and that the value of PFGI’s claim is $0. Additionally, on or about January 31, 2004, Fleming identified alleged preferential transfers to PFGI of up to $6,493,000, of which Fleming has alleged $5,014,000 are, or may be, eligible for protection as “new value.” Fleming additionally alleged that some, if not all, of the alleged PFGI preferential transfers may qualify as “ordinary course of business” transactions. Fleming has also made claims regarding payments it describes as overpayment, unjust enrichment due to allegedly excess wire transfers and payments and debts arising out of military sales. We have been advised that similar allegations have been made by Fleming in many, if not all, of the other pending reclamation claims filed against Fleming. We are currently in the process of analyzing the claims. Our attorneys have been in contact with counsel for Aurora and counsel for Fleming and all parties have expressed agreement that the most expedient manner to resolve the Aurora and Fleming claims would be to do so in the Fleming bankruptcy case under the terms of Fleming’s confirmed plan. Stipulations to this effect have been signed by all parties. We believe that resolution of such matters will not result in a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Aurora’s Fleming bankruptcy claim

Aurora, on or about March 31, 2003, filed a reclamation claim against Fleming, a customer, in Fleming’s bankruptcy proceeding pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware in the amount of $595,000. Fleming has claimed that the products in controversy had been commingled with other products and that the value of Aurora’s claim is $299,000. Additionally, on or about February 2, 2004, Fleming identified alleged preferential transfers to Aurora of up to $5,942,000, of which Fleming has alleged $3,293,000 are, or may be, eligible for protection as “new value.” Fleming additionally alleged that some, if not all, of the alleged Aurora preferential transfers may qualify as “ordinary course of business” transactions. Fleming has also made claims regarding payments it describes as overpayment, unjust enrichment due to allegedly excess wire transfers and payments and debts arising out of military sales. We have been advised that similar allegations have been made by Fleming in many, if not all, of the other pending reclamation claims filed against Fleming. We are currently in the process of analyzing the claims. Our attorneys have been in contact with counsel for Aurora and counsel for Fleming and all parties have expressed agreement that the most expedient manner to resolve the Aurora and Fleming claims would be to do so in the Fleming bankruptcy case under the terms of Fleming’s confirmed plan. Stipulations to this effect have been signed by all parties. We believe that resolution of such matters will not result in a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Employee litigation—indemnification of US Cold Storage

On March 21, 2002, an employee at the Omaha, Nebraska facility died as the result of an accident while operating a forklift at a warehouse facility that we leased. OSHA conducted a full investigation and determined that the death was the result of an accident and found no violations against us. On March 18, 2004, the Estate of the deceased filed suit in District Court of Sarpy County, Nebraska, Case No: CI 04-391, against us, the owner of the forklift and the leased warehouse, the manufacturer of the forklift and the distributor of the forklift. We, having been the deceased’s employer, were named as a defendant for worker’s compensation subrogation purposes only.

On May 18, 2004, we received notice from defendant, US Cold Storage, requesting that we accept the tender of defense for US Cold Storage in this case in accordance with the indemnification provision of the warehouse lease. The request has been submitted to our insurance carrier for evaluation and we have been advised that the indemnification provision is not applicable in this matter and that we should have no liability under that provision. Therefore, we believe that resolution of such matters will not result in a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

54

R2 appeal in Aurora bankruptcy

Prior to its bankruptcy filing, Aurora entered into an agreement with its prepetition lending group compromising the amount of certain fees due under its senior bank facilities (the “October Amendment”). One of the members of the bank group (“R2 Top Hat, Ltd.”) challenged the enforceability of the October Amendment during Aurora’s bankruptcy by filing an adversary proceeding and by objecting to confirmation. The bankruptcy court rejected the lender’s argument and confirmed Aurora’s plan of reorganization. The lender then appealed from those orders of the bankruptcy court. It is too early to predict the outcome of the appeals. Included in our recorded accrued liabilities is $20 million, which was assumed in the Aurora Transaction.

State of Illinois v. City of St. Elmo and Aurora Foods Inc.

The Company is a defendant in an action filed by the State of Illinois regarding the Company’s St. Elmo facility. The Illinois Attorney General filed a complaint seeking a restraining order prohibiting further discharges by the City of St. Elmo from its publicly owned wastewater treatment facility in violation of Illinois law and enjoining the Company from discharging its industrial waste into the City’s treatment facility. The complaint also asked for fines and penalties associated with the City’s discharge from its treatment facility and the Company’s alleged operation of its production facility without obtaining a state environmental operating permit.

On August 30, 2004, an Interim Consent Order signed by all parties was signed and entered by the Judge in the case whereby, in addition to a number of actions required of the City, the Company agreed to provide monthly discharge monitoring reports to the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency for six (6) months and was allowed to continue discharging effluent to the City of St. Elmo. In September 2004, the Company met with representatives from the State of Illinois Environmental Protection Agency and the State Attorney General’s Office and separately with the City of St. Elmo to inform them that the Company intended to install a pre-treatment system at its St. Elmo facility during the fourth quarter of 2004 and first quarter of 2005. The State issued the construction and operating permits to the Company and construction of the pre-treatment system has been completed. Testing is underway and the system is currently scheduled to be fully operational by the end of August 2005.

We continue to discharge our effluent to the City. We would vigorously defend any future effort to prevent us from discharging our industrial wastewater to the City. Although we believe we will be able to resolve this matter favorably, an adverse resolution may have a material impact on our financial position, results of operation, or cash flows.

Underweight Products

In July 2004, it came to our attention that certain products produced in one of the former Aurora plants have not met some state weight requirements. While we are in the process of investigating the scope of this issue, we have revised the operating procedures of the plant such that products produced there will comply with state product weight requirements. As a result of these weight issues, we voluntarily initiated return procedures for the product in the locations involved and also disposed of certain inventory held by us. We have recorded a charge related to the returns and inventory of $3.4 million and $1.2 million in the fiscal year ended July 31, 2004 and the transition year ended December 26, 2004, respectively. As a result of these underweight products, we have recently received a letter from the State of California, County of Santa Barbara, requesting that we meet with it to discuss this issue and the remedial actions taken by us. A meeting was held with the involved California officials on December 8, 2004 at which time the issues and corrective steps taken by us were presented and discussed. While we believe we have taken appropriate remedial steps, it is probable that fines and penalties will be imposed. The State of California has recently responded with its acknowledgment of our cooperation with the investigation and prompt reaction to and correction of the issue, and proposed a settlement amount which we are negotiating with the State of California. As of March 27, 2005, we have reserved $695,000 based upon the State of California’s latest settlement proposal. We will continue to vigorously defend our actions to date since taking control of the Aurora. We believe that resolution of such matters will not result in a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

55

American Cold Storage – North America, L/P. v. P.F. Distribution, LLC and Pinnacle Foods Group Inc.

On June 26, 2005 the Company was served with the Summons and Complaint in the above matter. American Cold Storage (“ACS”) operates a frozen storage warehouse and distribution facility (the “Facility”) located in Madison County, Tennessee, near the Company’s Jackson, Tennessee plant. In approximately April 2004, the Company entered into discussions with ACS to utilize the Facility. Terms were discussed, but no contract was ever signed. Shortly after shipping product to the Facility, the Company realized that the Facility was incapable of properly handling the discussed volume of product and began reducing its shipments to the Facility. The complaint seeks damages not to exceed $1.5 million, together with associated costs. It is too early to determine the likely outcome of this litigation. The Company is investigating and intends to vigorously defend against this claim.

56

ITEM 2: CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

     None

ITEM 3: DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

     None

ITEM 4: SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

     None

ITEM 5: OTHER INFORMATION

     None

ITEM 6: EXHIBITS

a) Exhibits

Exhibit Number		Description of exhibit
	31.1	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
	31.2	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
	32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(A)
	32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(A)

(A) Pursuant to Commission Release No. 33-8212, this certification will be treated as “accompanying” this Form 10-Q and not “filed” as part of such report for purposes of Section 18 of Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of Section 18 of the Exchange Act and this certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.

57

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Pinnacle Foods Group Inc.
	By:	/s/ N. MICHAEL DION
	Name:	N. Michael Dion
	Title:	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, (acting in both his capacity as authorized signatory on behalf of the registrant and as principal financial officer)
	Date:	August 9, 2005

58