Exhibit 99.2
| | |
| | BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC. |
SUPPLEMENTAL OPERATING AND FINANCIAL DATA
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
JUNE 30, 2005
| | |
| | |
Kendall Square D | | Kendall Square A |
Cambridge, MA | | Cambridge, MA |
Acquired May 2005 | | Acquired May 2005 |
Genzyme Corporation | | Vertex Pharmaceuticals |
All dollar amounts shown in this report are unaudited.
This Supplemental Operating and Financial Data package is not an offer to sell or solicitation to buy securities of BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. Any offers to
sell or solicitations to buy securities of BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. shall be made only by means of a prospectus approved for that purpose.
|
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS JUNE 30, 2005 |
| | | | |
| | Page | |
Company Background | | | 3 | |
Investor Information | | | 4 | |
Financial and Operating Highlights | | | 5 | |
Consolidated Balance Sheets | | | 6 | |
Consolidated Statements of Income | | | 7 | |
Reconciliation of Funds From Operations | | | 8 | |
Reconciliation of Adjusted Funds From Operations | | | 9 | |
Reconciliation of EBITDA and AFFO | | | 10 | |
Reconciliation of Net Operating Income | | | 11 | |
Coverage Ratios | | | 12 | |
Debt Summary | | | 13 | |
Debt Maturities and Principal Payments | | | 14 | |
Common Stock Data | | | 15 | |
Portfolio Summary | | | 16 | |
Occupancy Summary | | | 17 | |
Lease Expirations | | | 18 | |
Portfolio by Size | | | 19 | |
Boston Market | | | 20 | |
New York / New Jersey Market | | | 21 | |
San Francisco Market | | | 22 | |
Pennsylvania Market | | | 23 | |
San Diego Market | | | 24 | |
Seattle Market | | | 25 | |
Maryland Market | | | 26 | |
20 Largest Tenants | | | 27 | |
Redevelopment | | | 28 | |
Land Development Parcels | | | 29 | |
2005 Acquisitions | | | 30 | |
Joint Ventures | | | 31 | |
Leasing Activity | | | 32 | |
Non-GAAP Financial Measure Definitions | | | 33 | |
This supplemental package contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Although we believe the expectations reflected in any forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, you should exercise caution in interpreting and relying on these statements as they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which are, in some cases, beyond the company’s control and could materially affect actual results, performance or achievements. These factors include, without limitation, the ability to enter into new leases or renew leases on favorable terms, dependence on tenants’ financial condition, competition from other developers, owners and operators of real estate, adverse economic or real estate developments in the life science industry or the Boston or California regions, the uncertainty of real estate development and acquisition activity, the ability to complete or integrate acquisitions successfully, the availability and terms of financing and the use of debt to fund acquisitions and developments, the effect of local economic and market conditions, regulatory and tax law changes and other risks and uncertainties detailed from time to time in the company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
2
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
COMPANY BACKGROUND
JUNE 30, 2005
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. operates as a fully integrated, self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust (REIT) focused on acquiring, developing, owning, leasing and managing laboratory and office space for the life science industry. Our tenants include biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, scientific research institutions, government agencies and other entities involved in the life science industry. Our current properties and our primary acquisition targets are located in markets with well established reputations as centers for scientific research, including Boston, San Diego, San Francisco, Seattle, Maryland, Pennsylvania and New York/New Jersey.
On August 11, 2004, we completed our initial public offering at $15.00 per share, generating net proceeds of approximately $429.3 million.
From the completion of our initial public offering through March 31, 2005, we completed the acquisition of the 13 properties previously described in our initial public offering prospectus and six additional properties. Together, the 19 properties represented a total of 2.8 million rentable square feet of laboratory and office space.
On May 31, 2005, we completed the acquisition of a portfolio of eight properties including one parking structure in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and an additional property in Lebanon, New Hampshire. The portfolio totaled approximately 1.1 million rentable square feet of life science and office space that was 96.6% leased at acquisition.
In order to finance the Cambridge portfolio acquisition and provide additional working capital, on May 31, 2005, we entered into three credit facilities with KeyBank National Association and other lenders under which we initially borrowed $485.0 million of a total of $600.0 million available under these facilities. The credit facilities include a three-year, unsecured revolving credit facility of $250.0 million, under which we initially borrowed $135.0 million, a three-year, unsecured term loan facility of $100.0 million and a five-year, secured term loan facility of $250.0 million. The new $250.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility, which contains an accordion option up to $400.0 million, replaced our previously existing $100.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility. We entered into an interest rate swap agreement in connection with the closing of the credit facilities, which will have the effect of fixing the interest rate on the secured term loan at 6.4%.
On June 27, 2005, we completed a follow-on common stock offering of 15,122,500 shares at $22.50 per share, resulting in gross proceeds of $340.3 million. The net proceeds of $324.1 million were used to repay the outstanding balance on our unsecured revolving credit facility, and to repay our $100.0 million unsecured term loan. We expect to use the remaining proceeds for future property acquisitions and for other general corporate and working capital purposes.
In addition to the acquisition of the Cambridge portfolio, during the second quarter of 2005, we acquired Fresh Pond Research Park in Cambridge, Massachusetts, Coolidge Avenue in Watertown, Massachusetts, Phoenixville Pike in Malvern, Pennsylvania, Nancy Ridge Drive in San Diego, California and Dumbarton Circle in Fremont, California, for aggregate cash consideration of $59.8 million and the assumption of $7.0 million of debt. These properties contain a total of 318,640 rentable square feet of laboratory and office space.
As of June 30, 2005, we owned or had interests in 33 properties, located in Boston, San Diego, San Francisco, Seattle, Maryland, Pennsylvania, New York and New Jersey, consisting of 56 buildings with approximately 4.3 million rentable square feet of laboratory and office space, which was approximately 92.3% leased to 78 tenants. Of the remaining unleased space, 183,838 square feet, or 4.3% of our total rentable square footage, was under redevelopment. We also owned undeveloped land that we estimate can support up to 600,000 rentable square feet of laboratory and office space.
This Supplemental Operating and Financial Data package supplements the information provided in our quarterly and annual reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Additional information about us and our properties is also available at our website:www.biomedrealty.com.
3
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
INVESTOR INFORMATION
JUNE 30, 2005
| | | | | | |
Board of Directors | | | | Executive Officers | | |
| | |
Alan D. Gold | | Mark J. Riedy, Ph.D. | | Alan D. Gold | | Matthew G. McDevitt |
Chairman | | | | President and Chief Executive Officer | | Vice President, Acquisitions |
| | | | | | |
Gary A. Kreitzer | | Theodore D. Roth | | Gary A. Kreitzer | | |
| | | | Executive Vice President, General | | |
Barbara R. Cambon | | M. Faye Wilson | | Counsel, and Secretary | | |
| | | | | | |
Edward A. Dennis, Ph.D. | | | | John F. Wilson, II | | |
| | | | Chief Financial Officer | | |
| | | | | | |
Equity Research Coverage | | | | | | |
|
Friedman Billings Ramsey | | Legg Mason Wood Walker | | RBC Capital Markets | | |
Paul Morgan / Michael Blank | | Jerry L. Doctrow | | David T. Copp / Jay Leupp | | |
703.469.1255 / 703.469.1115 | | 800.368.2558 | | 415.633.8558 | | |
| | | | | | |
KeyBanc Capital Markets | | Raymond James | | Standard & Poor's | | |
Richard C. Moore | | Paul D. Puryear / Ken Avalos | | Karen J. Sack | | |
216.443.2815 | | 800.248.8863 | | 212.438.9541 | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Company Information | | | | | | |
|
Corporate Headquarters | | Trading Symbol | | Transfer Agent | | Investor Relations Contact |
17140 Bernardo Center Drive, Suite 222 | | BMR | | The Bank of New York | | John F. Wilson, II |
San Diego, CA 92128 | | | | 101 Barclay Street, 11E | | Chief Financial Officer |
858.485.9840 | | Stock Exchange Listing | | New York, NY 10286 | | 858.485.9840 |
858.485.9843 (fax) | | New York Stock Exchange | | 212.815.3782 | | |
| | | | | | |
Please visit our corporate website at: | | | | | | |
www.biomedrealty.com | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
2005 Tentative Schedule for Quarterly Results | | | | |
|
Third Quarter | | Early November | | | | |
Fourth Quarter | | Early February | | | | |
4
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
FINANCIAL AND OPERATING HIGHLIGHTS
JUNE 30, 2005
(In thousands, except per share, ratio and portfolio amounts)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of or for the three months ended | |
| | 6/30/05 | | | 3/31/05 | | | 12/31/04 | | | 9/30/04(1) | |
Selected Operating Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | | $ | 28,563 | | | $ | 24,471 | | | $ | 19,670 | | | $ | 8,985 | |
Straight line rent | | | 1,396 | | | | 1,088 | | | | 750 | | | | 375 | |
Fair value lease revenue (2) | | | 330 | | | | (58 | ) | | | (175 | ) | | | (112 | ) |
EBITDA (3) | | | 16,813 | | | | 13,856 | | | | 9,760 | | | | 4,375 | |
Interest expense | | | 6,812 | | | | 1,411 | | | | 962 | | | | 218 | |
Net income | | | 1,440 | | | | 5,836 | | | | 2,955 | | | | 1,827 | |
Net income per share — diluted | | $ | 0.05 | | | $ | 0.19 | | | $ | 0.09 | | | $ | 0.06 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
FFO (4) | | | 10,067 | | | | 12,554 | | | | 8,885 | | | | 3,941 | |
FFO per share — diluted (4) | | $ | 0.29 | | | $ | 0.37 | | | $ | 0.26 | | | $ | 0.13 | |
AFFO (5) | | | 10,747 | | | | 12,725 | | | | 9,563 | | | | 4,422 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selected Balance Sheet Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 113,014 | | | $ | 15,570 | | | $ | 27,869 | | | $ | 36,863 | |
Rental property, net | | | 1,028,406 | | | | 489,136 | | | | 468,488 | | | | 403,454 | |
Total assets | | | 1,327,145 | | | | 601,617 | | | | 581,723 | | | | 519,764 | |
Total liabilities | | | 569,371 | | | | 159,258 | | | | 137,639 | | | | 70,583 | |
Minority interests | | | 21,775 | | | | 22,486 | | | | 22,267 | | | | 22,708 | |
Total stockholders’ equity | | | 735,999 | | | | 419,873 | | | | 421,817 | | | | 426,473 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capitalization | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total common shares outstanding | | | 46,567 | | | | 31,433 | | | | 31,386 | | | | 31,383 | |
Total units outstanding | | | 2,870 | | | | 2,870 | | | | 2,870 | | | | 2,870 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total common shares and units outstanding | | | 49,437 | | | | 34,303 | | | | 34,256 | | | | 34,253 | |
Share price at quarter end | | $ | 23.85 | | | $ | 20.60 | | | $ | 22.21 | | | $ | 17.59 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity value at quarter end (6) | | | 1,179,072 | | | | 706,642 | | | | 760,826 | | | | 602,510 | |
Consolidated debt | | $ | 499,818 | | | $ | 121,094 | | | $ | 102,236 | | | $ | 47,598 | |
Total market capitalization | | | 1,678,890 | | | | 827,736 | | | | 863,062 | | | | 650,108 | |
Debt / total market capitalization | | | 29.8 | % | | | 14.6 | % | | | 11.8 | % | | | 7.3 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Financial Ratios | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest coverage (7) | | | 2.5 | | | | 9.5 | | | | 9.6 | | | | 20.1 | |
Fixed charge coverage (7) | | | 2.2 | | | | 7.5 | | | | 8.1 | | | | 16.7 | |
FFO payout | | | 93.6 | % | | | 73.4 | % | | | 103.7 | % | | | 116.8 | % |
AFFO payout | | | 87.7 | % | | | 72.5 | % | | | 96.4 | % | | | 104.1 | % |
Debt / total assets | | | 37.7 | % | | | 20.1 | % | | | 16.7 | % | | | 9.2 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Portfolio Statistics | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Properties owned at end of quarter | | | 33 | | | | 19 | | | | 17 | | | | 13 | |
Total rentable square footage owned | | | 4,255,989 | | | | 2,795,086 | | | | 2,629,350 | | | | 2,298,641 | |
Leased at end of quarter | | | 92.3 | % | | | 91.5 | % | | | 95.3 | % | | | 94.7 | % |
Redevelopment at end of quarter | | | 4.3 | % | | | 3.7 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
Vacancy at end of quarter | | | 3.4 | % | | | 4.8 | % | | | 4.7 | % | | | 5.3 | % |
| | |
(1) | | Represents results for the period from August 11, 2004 through September 30, 2004. |
|
(2) | | Represents the net adjustment for above and below market leases which are being amortized over the remaining term of the respective leases from the date of acquisition. |
|
(3) | | For a definition and discussion of EBITDA, see page 33. For a quantitative reconciliation of the differences between EBITDA and net income, see page 10. |
|
(4) | | For a definition and discussion of FFO, see page 33. For a quantitative reconciliation of the differences between FFO and net income, see page 8. |
|
(5) | | For a definition and discussion of AFFO, see page 33. For a quantitative reconciliation of the differences between AFFO and net income, see page 9. |
|
| | For a qualitative reconciliation of the differences between AFFO and cash flow from operating activities, see page 10. |
|
(6) | | Assuming conversion of 100% of the operating partnership units into shares of common stock. |
|
(7) | | For a discussion of coverage ratios, see page 33. See page 12 for detail. |
5
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
JUNE 30, 2005
(In thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2005 | | | March 31, 2005 | | | December 31, 2004 | | | September 30, 2004 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rental property, net | | $ | 1,028,406 | | | $ | 489,136 | | | $ | 468,488 | | | $ | 403,454 | |
Property under development | | | 5,337 | | | | 5,373 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Investment in unconsolidated partnership | | | 2,490 | | | | 2,505 | | | | 2,470 | | | | 2,508 | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | 113,014 | | | | 15,570 | | | | 27,869 | | | | 36,863 | |
Restricted cash | | | 4,592 | | | | 2,572 | | | | 2,470 | | | | 854 | |
Accounts receivable, net | | | 5,690 | | | | 5,255 | | | | 1,837 | | | | 1,074 | |
Accrued straight-line rents, net | | | 5,620 | | | | 4,224 | | | | 3,306 | | | | 2,535 | |
Acquired above market leases, net | | | 7,813 | | | | 7,543 | | | | 8,006 | | | | 8,357 | |
Deferred leasing costs, net | | | 143,609 | | | | 60,950 | | | | 61,503 | | | | 58,462 | |
Deferred loan costs, net | | | 5,530 | | | | 1,605 | | | | 1,700 | | | | 1,388 | |
Prepaid expenses | | | 2,627 | | | | 2,154 | | | | 1,531 | | | | 1,601 | |
Other assets | | | 2,417 | | | | 4,730 | | | | 2,543 | | | | 2,668 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 1,327,145 | | | $ | 601,617 | | | $ | 581,723 | | | $ | 519,764 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage notes payable, net | | $ | 249,818 | | | $ | 101,594 | | | $ | 102,236 | | | $ | 47,598 | |
Secured term loan | | | 250,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Unsecured line of credit | | | — | | | | 19,500 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Security deposits | | | 5,976 | | | | 5,227 | | | | 4,831 | | | | 3,258 | |
Due to affiliates | | | — | | | | — | | | | 53 | | | | 91 | |
Dividends and distributions payable | | | 9,265 | | | | 9,262 | | | | 9,249 | | | | 5,055 | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | | 22,324 | | | | 9,466 | | | | 7,529 | | | | 7,663 | |
Acquired lease obligations, net | | | 31,988 | | | | 14,209 | | | | 13,741 | | | | 6,918 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 569,371 | | | | 159,258 | | | | 137,639 | | | | 70,583 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Minority interests | | | 21,775 | | | | 22,486 | | | | 22,267 | | | | 22,708 | |
Stockholders’ equity: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Common stock | | | 465 | | | | 314 | | | | 314 | | | | 314 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 759,228 | | | | 435,010 | | | | 434,075 | | | | 433,702 | |
Deferred compensation | | | (3,838 | ) | | | (4,410 | ) | | | (4,182 | ) | | | (4,672 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income | | | (1,765 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Dividends in excess of earnings | | | (18,091 | ) | | | (11,041 | ) | | | (8,390 | ) | | | (2,871 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total stockholders’ equity | | | 735,999 | | | | 419,873 | | | | 421,817 | | | | 426,473 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | $ | 1,327,145 | | | $ | 601,617 | | | $ | 581,723 | | | $ | 519,764 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
6
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
JUNE 30, 2005
(In thousands, except share data)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | |
| | June 30, 2005 | | | March 31, 2005 | | | December 31, 2004 | | | September 30, 2004 (1) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rental | | $ | 20,014 | | | $ | 14,214 | | | $ | 13,326 | | | $ | 6,107 | |
Tenant recoveries | | | 8,549 | | | | 7,254 | | | | 6,344 | | | | 2,878 | |
Other income | | | — | | | | 3,003 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | | | 28,563 | | | | 24,471 | | | | 19,670 | | | | 8,985 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rental operations | | | 6,721 | | | | 6,395 | | | | 6,415 | | | | 3,615 | |
Real estate taxes | | | 2,476 | | | | 1,788 | | | | 1,589 | | | | — | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 8,476 | | | | 6,191 | | | | 5,602 | | | | 2,251 | |
General and administrative | | | 2,695 | | | | 2,550 | | | | 2,011 | | | | 1,119 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total expenses | | | 20,368 | | | | 16,924 | | | | 15,617 | | | | 6,985 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from operations | | | 8,195 | | | | 7,547 | | | | 4,053 | | | | 2,000 | |
Equity in net income (loss) of unconsolidated partnership | | | 20 | | | | 51 | | | | (11 | ) | | | — | |
Interest income | | | 102 | | | | 78 | | | | 66 | | | | 124 | |
Interest expense | | | (6,812 | ) | | | (1,411 | ) | | | (962 | ) | | | (218 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income before minority interests | | | 1,505 | | | | 6,265 | | | | 3,146 | | | | 1,906 | |
Minority interests | | | (65 | ) | | | (429 | ) | | | (191 | ) | | | (79 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 1,440 | | | $ | 5,836 | | | $ | 2,955 | | | $ | 1,827 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic earnings per share | | $ | 0.05 | | | $ | 0.19 | | | $ | 0.10 | | | $ | 0.06 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted earnings per share | | $ | 0.05 | | | $ | 0.19 | | | $ | 0.09 | | | $ | 0.06 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted-average common shares outstanding: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | 31,861,536 | | | | 31,129,613 | | | | 31,107,856 | | | | 30,673,883 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted | | | 34,893,367 | | | | 34,148,820 | | | | 34,129,493 | | | | 30,754,840 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Represents results for the period from August 11, 2004 through September 30, 2004. |
7
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS (1)
JUNE 30, 2005
(In thousands, except per share and ratio amounts)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | |
| | June 30, 2005 | | | March 31, 2005 | | | December 31, 2004 | | | September 30, 2004 (2) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reconciliation of net income to funds from operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 1,440 | | | $ | 5,836 | | | $ | 2,955 | | | $ | 1,827 | |
Minority interest of exchangeable operating partnership units | | | 131 | | | | 538 | | | | 278 | | | | (137 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization (3) | | | 8,496 | | | | 6,180 | | | | 5,652 | | | | 2,251 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Funds from operations (FFO) | | $ | 10,067 | | | $ | 12,554 | | | $ | 8,885 | | | $ | 3,941 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
FFO per share — diluted | | $ | 0.29 | | | $ | 0.37 | | | $ | 0.26 | | | $ | 0.13 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends and distributions declared per share | | $ | 0.27 | | | $ | 0.27 | | | $ | 0.27 | | | $ | 0.1497 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
FFO payout ratio (4) | | | 93.6 | % | | | 73.4 | % | | | 103.7 | % | | | 116.8 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | For a definition and discussion of FFO, see page 33. |
|
(2) | | Represents results for the period from August 11, 2004 through September 30, 2004. |
|
(3) | | Includes the company’s share of depreciation and amortization from unconsolidated joint ventures of $20, $(11), $50 and $0, respectively. |
|
(4) | | Calculated as dividends and distributions declared per share divided by FFO per share — diluted. |
8
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
ADJUSTED FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS (1)
JUNE 30, 2005
(In thousands, except per share and ratio amounts)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | |
| | June 30, 2005 | | | March 31, 2005 | | | December 31, 2004 | | | September 30, 2004 (2) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Funds from operations | | $ | 10,067 | | | $ | 12,554 | | | $ | 8,885 | | | $ | 3,941 | |
Master lease receipts (3) | | | 517 | | | | 786 | | | | 872 | | | | 455 | |
Second generation capital expenditures | | | (750 | ) | | | (160 | ) | | | (57 | ) | | | — | |
Amortization of deferred loan costs | | | 2,204 | | | | 129 | | | | 113 | | | | 49 | |
Amortization of fair value of debt acquired | | | (390 | ) | | | (261 | ) | | | (219 | ) | | | (88 | ) |
Non-cash stock compensation | | | 825 | | | | 707 | | | | 544 | | | | 328 | |
Straight-line rents | | | (1,396 | ) | | | (1,088 | ) | | | (750 | ) | | | (375 | ) |
Fair value lease revenue | | | (330 | ) | | | 58 | | | | 175 | | | | 112 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Adjusted funds from operations (AFFO) | | $ | 10,747 | | | $ | 12,725 | | | $ | 9,563 | | | $ | 4,422 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends and distributions declared | | $ | 0.27 | | | $ | 0.27 | | | $ | 0.27 | | | $ | 0.1497 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
AFFO payout ratio (4) | | | 87.7 | % | | | 72.5 | % | | | 96.4 | % | | | 104.1 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | For a definition and discussion of AFFO, see page 33. For a qualitative reconciliation of the differences between AFFO and cash flow from operating activities, see page 10. |
|
(2) | | Represents results for the period from August 11, 2004 through September 30, 2004. |
|
(3) | | Revenues earned and received per the terms of master lease agreements that for GAAP purposes are not included in rental revenues, but as a reduction to assets. |
|
(4) | | Calculated as dividends and distributions declared per share divided by AFFO per share — diluted. |
9
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
RECONCILIATION OF
EARNINGS BEFORE INTEREST, TAXES, DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION(1)
AND ADJUSTED FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS(2)
JUNE 30, 2005
(In thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | |
| | June 30, 2005 | | | March 31, 2005 | | | December 31, 2004 | | | September 30, 2004(3) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reconciliation of net income to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA): | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 1,440 | | | $ | 5,836 | | | $ | 2,955 | | | $ | 1,827 | |
Minority interest | | | 65 | | | | 429 | | | | 191 | | | | 79 | |
Interest expense | | | 6,812 | | | | 1,411 | | | | 962 | | | | 218 | |
Depreciation and amortization (4) | | | 8,496 | | | | 6,180 | | | | 5,652 | | | | 2,251 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
EBITDA | | $ | 16,813 | | | $ | 13,856 | | | $ | 9,760 | | | $ | 4,375 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reconciliation of cash flows provided by operating activities to adjusted funds from operations (AFFO): | | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from operating activities | | $ | 23,038 | | | $ | 10,062 | | | $ | 5,746 | | | $ | 8,189 | |
Changes in other assets and liabilities | | | (12,808 | ) | | | 1,877 | | | | 2,945 | | | | (4,222 | ) |
Master lease receipts | | | 517 | | | | 786 | | | | 872 | | | | 455 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
AFFO | | $ | 10,747 | | | $ | 12,725 | | | $ | 9,563 | | | $ | 4,422 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | For a definition and discussion of EBITDA, see page 33. |
|
(2) | | For a definition and discussion of AFFO, see page 33. |
|
(3) | | Represents results for the period from August 11, 2004 through September 30, 2004. |
|
(4) | | Includes the company’s share of depreciation and amortization from unconsolidated joint ventures of $20, $(11), $50 and $0, respectively. |
10
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
RECONCILIATION OF NET OPERATING INCOME (1)
JUNE 30, 2005
(In thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | |
| | June 30, 2005 | | | March 31, 2005 | | | December 31, 2004 | | | September 30, 2004(2) | |
Net income | | $ | 1,440 | | | $ | 5,836 | | | $ | 2,955 | | | $ | 1,827 | |
Minority interest | | | 65 | | | | 429 | | | | 191 | | | | 79 | |
(Income) / loss from unconsolidated joint venture | | | (20 | ) | | | (51 | ) | | | 11 | | | | — | |
Interest expense | | | 6,812 | | | | 1,411 | | | | 962 | | | | 218 | |
Interest income | | | (102 | ) | | | (78 | ) | | | (66 | ) | | | (124 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from operations | | | 8,195 | | | | 7,547 | | | | 4,053 | | | | 2,000 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 8,476 | | | | 6,191 | | | | 5,602 | | | | 2,251 | |
General and administrative | | | 2,695 | | | | 2,550 | | | | 2,011 | | | | 1,119 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consolidated net operating income | | $ | 19,366 | | | $ | 16,288 | | | $ | 11,666 | | | $ | 5,370 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | For a definition and discussion of net operating income, see page 33. |
|
(2) | | Represents results for the period from August 11, 2004 through September 30, 2004. |
11
|
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC. COVERAGE RATIOS (1) JUNE 30, 2005 (In thousands, except ratios) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | |
| | June 30, 2005 | | | March 31, 2005 | | | December 31, 2004 | | | September 30, 2004 (2) | |
Interest coverage ratio: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EBITDA | | $ | 16,813 | | | $ | 13,856 | | | $ | 9,760 | | | $ | 4,375 | |
Interest expense: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense (3) | | | 6,812 | | | | 1,411 | | | | 962 | | | | 218 | |
Interest expense — unconsolidated joint venture | | | 50 | | | | 49 | | | | 52 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total interest expense | | | 6,862 | | | | 1,460 | | | | 1,014 | | | | 218 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest coverage ratio | | | 2.5 | | | | 9.5 | | | | 9.6 | | | | 20.1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fixed charge coverage ratio: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EBITDA | | $ | 16,813 | | | $ | 13,856 | | | $ | 9,760 | | | $ | 4,375 | |
Fixed charges: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense (3) | | | 6,812 | | | | 1,411 | | | | 962 | | | | 218 | |
Interest expense — unconsolidated joint venture | | | 50 | | | | 49 | | | | 52 | | | | — | |
Principal payments | | | 821 | | | | 381 | | | | 190 | | | | 44 | |
Principal payments — unconsolidated joint venture | | | 4 | | | | 4 | | | | 7 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total fixed charges | | | 7,687 | | | | 1,845 | | | | 1,211 | | | | 262 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fixed charge coverage ratio | | | 2.2 | | | | 7.5 | | | | 8.1 | | | | 16.7 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | For a discussion of coverage ratios, see page 33. |
|
(2) | | Represents results for the period from August 11, 2004 through September 30, 2004. |
|
(3) | | Includes $2.0 million of loan fee amortization expense related to the repayment and termination of our $100.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility and our $100.0 million unsecured term loan facility. |
12
|
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC. DEBT SUMMARY JUNE 30, 2005 (Dollars in thousands) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Carrying | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Stated | | | Effective | | | Principal | | | Unamortized | | | Value at | | | Maturity | | | Monthly | | | Due at | |
Consolidated debt: | | Rate | | | Rate(1) | | | Balance | | | Premium(2) | | | June 30, 2005 | | | Date | | | Debt Service | | | Maturity | |
Mortgage notes payable (3) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ardentech Court | | | 7.25 | % | | | 5.06 | % | | $ | 4,787 | | | $ | 572 | | | $ | 5,359 | | | | 07/12 | | | $ | 36 | | | $ | 4,021 | |
Bayshore Boulevard | | | 4.55 | % | | | 4.55 | % | | | 16,289 | | | | — | | | | 16,289 | | | | 01/10 | | | | 92 | | | | 14,546 | |
Bridgeview | | | 8.07 | % | | | 5.04 | % | | | 11,782 | | | | 1,703 | | | | 13,485 | | | | 01/11 | | | | 89 | | | | 11,175 | |
Eisenhower Road | | | 5.80 | % | | | 4.63 | % | | | 2,229 | | | | 67 | | | | 2,296 | | | | 05/08 | | | | 15 | | | | 2,110 | |
Elliott Avenue | | | 7.38 | % | | | 4.63 | % | | | 16,765 | | | | 923 | | | | 17,688 | | | | 11/07 | | | | 142 | | | | 15,550 | |
40 Erie Street | | | 7.34 | % | | | 4.90 | % | | | 20,041 | | | | 1,302 | | | | 21,343 | | | | 08/08 | | | | 199 | | | | 17,174 | |
Kendall Square D (4) | | | 6.38 | % | | | 5.45 | % | | | 73,078 | | | | 5,486 | | | | 78,564 | | | | 12/18 | | | | 501 | | | | 38,154 | |
Lucent Drive (5) | | | 5.50 | % | | | 5.50 | % | | | 5,986 | | | | — | | | | 5,986 | | | | 01/15 | | | | 42 | | | | 3,952 | |
Monte Villa Parkway | | | 4.55 | % | | | 4.55 | % | | | 9,916 | | | | — | | | | 9,916 | | | | 01/10 | | | | 56 | | | | 8,855 | |
Nancy Ridge Drive | | | 7.15 | % | | | 5.57 | % | | | 6,989 | | | | 670 | | | | 7,659 | | | | 09/12 | | | | 48 | | | | 6,292 | |
Science Center Drive | | | 7.65 | % | | | 5.04 | % | | | 11,638 | | | | 1,549 | | | | 13,187 | | | | 07/11 | | | | 85 | | | | 10,800 | |
Sidney Street | | | 7.23 | % | | | 5.11 | % | | | 31,755 | | | | 3,642 | | | | 35,397 | | | | 06/12 | | | | 245 | | | | 26,120 | |
Towne Centre Drive | | | 4.55 | % | | | 4.55 | % | | | 22,649 | | | | — | | | | 22,649 | | | | 01/10 | | | | 128 | | | | 20,225 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / weighted average on fixed rate notes | | | 6.43 | % | | | 5.06 | % | | $ | 233,904 | | | $ | 15,914 | | | $ | 249,818 | | | | | | | $ | 1,678 | | | $ | 178,974 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Variable rate debt (6) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$250 million secured term loan (7) | | | 6.41 | % | | | 6.41 | % | | | 250,000 | | | | — | | | | 250,000 | | | | 05/10 | | | | 1,335 | | | | 250,000 | |
$250 million unsecured line of credit (8) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 05/08 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / weighted average consolidated debt | | | 6.42 | % | | | 5.75 | % | | $ | 483,904 | | | $ | 15,914 | | | $ | 499,818 | | | | | | | $ | 3,013 | | | $ | 428,974 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Pro rata share of unconsolidated joint venture debt | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
McKellar Court (21%) | | | 8.56 | % | | | 4.63 | % | | | 2,266 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 01/10 | | | | 18 | | | | 376 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / weighted average | | | 8.56 | % | | | 4.63 | % | | $ | 2,266 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | | | | | $ | 18 | | | $ | 376 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / weighted average consolidated and pro rata share of unconsolidated joint venture debt | | | 6.43 | % | | | 5.75 | % | | $ | 486,170 | | | $ | 15,914 | | | $ | 499,818 | | | | | | | $ | 3,031 | | | $ | 429,350 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Represents the company’s incremental borrowing rate on the date of acquisition of the property. |
|
(2) | | Represents the unamortized premium to record the debt at its fair value based on the company’s incremental borrowing rate on the date of acquisition. |
|
(3) | | Require monthly principal and interest payments. |
|
(4) | | The monthly debt service increases to $626,000 from January 2015 through maturity. |
|
(5) | | The interest rate adjusts each fifth anniversary of the loan. The next adjustment date is January 2010. The interest rate adjustment is the five-year US Treasury plus 250 basis points. |
|
(6) | | Require monthly interest payments. |
|
(7) | | Interest on the $250 million secured term loan is LIBOR-indexed variable. We have entered into an interest rate swap agreement to fix the interest rate on the entire $250 million outstanding on this secured term loan at 6.4% through the maturity date. |
|
(8) | | Interest on the $250 million unsecured line of credit is a LIBOR-indexed variable plus credit spread, which ranges from 120 to 200 basis points depending on our leverage. |
13
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
DEBT MATURITIES AND PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS
JUNE 30, 2005
(In thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Schedule of Maturities | |
Property | | 2005 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | Thereafter | | | Total | |
Ardentech Court | | $ | 46 | | | $ | 93 | | | $ | 100 | | | $ | 107 | | | $ | 116 | | | $ | 4,325 | | | $ | 4,787 | |
Bayshore Boulevard | | | 182 | | | | 377 | | | | 394 | | | | 413 | | | | 432 | | | | 14,491 | | | | 16,289 | |
Bridgeview | | | 56 | | | | 108 | | | | 117 | | | | 124 | | | | 137 | | | | 11,240 | | | | 11,782 | |
Eisenhower Road | | | 21 | | | | 47 | | | | 50 | | | | 2,111 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,229 | |
Elliott Avenue | | | 239 | | | | 506 | | | | 16,020 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 16,765 | |
40 Erie Street | | | 388 | | | | 977 | | | | 1,052 | | | | 17,624 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 20,041 | |
Kendall Square D | | | 682 | | | | 1,432 | | | | 1,526 | | | | 1,626 | | | | 1,733 | | | | 66,079 | | | | 73,078 | |
Lucent Drive | | | 73 | | | | 180 | | | | 191 | | | | 201 | | | | 213 | | | | 5,128 | | | | 5,986 | |
Monte Villa Parkway | | | 133 | | | | 229 | | | | 240 | | | | 251 | | | | 263 | | | | 8,800 | | | | 9,916 | |
Nancy Ridge Drive | | | 38 | | | | 80 | | | | 86 | | | | 91 | | | | 100 | | | | 6,594 | | | | 6,989 | |
Science Center Drive | | | 61 | | | | 133 | | | | 143 | | | | 152 | | | | 167 | | | | 10,982 | | | | 11,638 | |
Sidney Street | | | 329 | | | | 694 | | | | 746 | | | | 802 | | | | 862 | | | | 28,322 | | | | 31,755 | |
Towne Centre Drive | | | 254 | | | | 524 | | | | 548 | | | | 574 | | | | 601 | | | | 20,148 | | | | 22,649 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total fixed rate notes | | | 2,502 | | | | 5,380 | | | | 21,213 | | | | 24,076 | | | | 4,624 | | | | 176,109 | | | | 233,904 | |
$250 million secured term loan | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 250,000 | | | | 250,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total consolidated debt | | | 2,502 | | | | 5,380 | | | | 21,213 | | | | 24,076 | | | | 4,624 | | | | 426,109 | | | | 483,904 | |
McKellar Court (21%) | | | 17 | | | | 25 | | | | 27 | | | | 29 | | | | 32 | | | | 2,136 | | | | 2,266 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total consolidated and pro rata share of unconsolidated joint venture debt | | $ | 2,519 | | | $ | 5,405 | | | $ | 21,240 | | | $ | 24,105 | | | $ | 4,656 | | | $ | 428,245 | | | $ | 486,170 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
14
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
COMMON STOCK DATA
JUNE 30, 2005
(Shares in thousands)
SUMMARY OF COMMON SHARES
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | |
| | June 30, 2005 | | | March 31, 2005 | |
Weighted average shares outstanding | | | 31,862 | | | | 31,130 | |
Weighted average units outstanding | | | 2,870 | | | | 2,870 | |
Dilutive effect of restricted stock | | | 81 | | | | 74 | |
Dilutive effect of stock warrant | | | 80 | | | | 75 | |
| | | | | | |
Diluted shares — EPS and FFO | | | 34,893 | | | | 34,149 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | |
| | Six Months Ended | |
| | June 30, 2005 | |
Weighted average shares outstanding | | | 31,515 | |
Weighted average units outstanding | | | 2,870 | |
Dilutive effect of restricted stock | | | 81 | |
Dilutive effect of stock warrant | | | 78 | |
| | | |
Diluted shares — EPS and FFO | | | 34,544 | |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | As of | | | As of | |
| | June 30, 2005 | | | March 31, 2005 | |
Shares outstanding | | | 46,282 | | | | 31,160 | |
Units outstanding | | | 2,870 | | | | 2,870 | |
Unvested restricted shares outstanding | | | 285 | | | | 273 | |
Stock warrant outstanding | | | 270 | | | | 270 | |
| | | | | | |
Total | | | 49,707 | | | | 34,573 | |
| | | | | | |
COMMON STOCK DATA
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | |
| | June 30, 2005 | | | March 31, 2005 | |
High Price | | $ | 24.47 | | | $ | 22.40 | |
Low Price | | $ | 19.39 | | | $ | 19.40 | |
Average Closing Price | | $ | 21.30 | | | $ | 20.77 | |
Closing Price | | $ | 23.85 | | | $ | 20.60 | |
Dividends per share — Annualized | | $ | 1.08 | | | $ | 1.08 | |
Closing Dividend Yield — Annualized | | | 4.5 | % | | | 5.2 | % |
DIVIDENDS
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Per Share | |
2005 | | | | | | | | |
First quarter | | | | | | $ | 0.2700 | |
Second quarter | | | | | | $ | 0.2700 | |
| | | | | | | | |
2004 | | | | | | | | |
Third quarter | | | | | | $ | 0.1497 | |
Fourth quarter | | | | | | $ | 0.2700 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Latest Dividend | | | | | | | | |
Amount | | $ | 0.27 | | | | | |
Declared | | June 3, 2005 | | | | | |
Record | | June 15, 2005 | | | | | |
Paid | | July 15, 2005 | | | | | |
15
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
PORTFOLIO SUMMARY
JUNE 30, 2005
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Percent of | | | Current | | | | | | | Percent of | | | Annualized | |
| | | | | | Rentable | | | Percent of | | | Current | | | Current | | | Annualized | | | Annualized | | | Annualized | | | Base Rent per | |
| | | | | | Square | | | Rentable | | | Annualized | | | Annualized | | | Base Rent per | | | Base Rent | | | Base Rent | | | Leased Sq Ft | |
Market | | Properties | | | Feet | | | Sq Ft | | | Base Rent (1) | | | Base Rent | | | Leased Sq Ft | | | at Expiration | | | at Expiration | | | at Expiration | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | |
Boston (2) | | | 11 | | | | 1,270,365 | | | | 29.8 | % | | $ | 46,217 | | | | 42.2 | % | | $ | 37.93 | | | $ | 50,290 | | | | 40.3 | % | | $ | 42.14 | |
New York / New Jersey | | | 2 | | | | 823,948 | | | | 19.4 | % | | | 14,252 | | | | 13.0 | % | | | 18.18 | | | | 15,403 | | | | 12.4 | % | | | 21.33 | |
San Francisco | | | 5 | | | | 717,970 | | | | 16.9 | % | | | 14,206 | | | | 13.0 | % | | | 22.20 | | | | 19,409 | | | | 15.6 | % | | | 30.33 | |
Pennsylvania | | | 3 | | | | 559,259 | | | | 13.1 | % | | | 10,282 | | | | 9.4 | % | | | 20.30 | | | | 10,575 | | | | 8.5 | % | | | 20.87 | |
San Diego (3) | | | 8 | | | | 529,641 | | | | 12.4 | % | | | 14,986 | | | | 13.7 | % | | | 29.89 | | | | 17,180 | | | | 13.8 | % | | | 35.31 | |
Seattle | | | 2 | | | | 185,989 | | | | 4.4 | % | | | 6,905 | | | | 6.3 | % | | | 37.13 | | | | 7,732 | | | | 6.2 | % | | | 41.57 | |
Maryland | | | 2 | | | | 168,817 | | | | 4.0 | % | | | 2,625 | | | | 2.4 | % | | | 15.55 | | | | 3,971 | | | | 3.2 | % | | | 23.52 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / weighted average | | | 33 | | | | 4,255,989 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 109,473 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 27.86 | | | $ | 124,560 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 31.70 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Based on current annualized base rent. Current annualized rent is the monthly contractual rent as of June 30, 2005, or if rent has not yet commenced, the first monthly rent payment due, multiplied by 12 months. |
|
(2) | | Excludes parking revenue of $1,063,000 for 47 Erie Street Parking Structure. |
|
(3) | | Includes 72,863 square feet of an unconsolidated partnership, of which we own 21%. |
16
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
OCCUPANCY SUMMARY
JUNE 30, 2005
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Rentable Square Feet | | | Percent of Total | |
Market | | Properties | | | Leased | | | Redevelopment | | | Vacant | | | Total | | | Leased | | | Redevelopment | | | Vacant | | | Total | |
Boston | | | 11 | | | | 1,218,633 | | | | — | | | | 51,732 | | | | 1,270,365 | | | | 95.9 | % | | | — | | | | 4.1 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
New York / New Jersey | | | 2 | | | | 722,204 | | | | 61,616 | | | | 40,128 | | | | 823,948 | | | | 87.7 | % | | | 7.5 | % | | | 4.8 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
San Francisco | | | 5 | | | | 639,970 | | | | 54,659 | | | | 23,341 | | | | 717,970 | | | | 89.1 | % | | | 7.6 | % | | | 3.3 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
Pennsylvania | | | 3 | | | | 506,629 | | | | 52,630 | | | | — | | | | 559,259 | | | | 90.6 | % | | | 9.4 | % | | | 0.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
San Diego | | | 8 | | | | 486,505 | | | | 14,933 | | | | 28,203 | | | | 529,641 | | | | 91.9 | % | | | 2.8 | % | | | 5.3 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
Seattle | | | 2 | | | | 185,989 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 185,989 | | | | 100.0 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
Maryland | | | 2 | | | | 168,817 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 168,817 | | | | 100.0 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 33 | | | | 3,928,747 | | | | 183,838 | | | | 143,404 | | | | 4,255,989 | | | | 92.3 | % | | | 4.3 | % | | | 3.4 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Historical Leased | |
| | 6/30/05 | | | 3/31/05 | | | 12/31/04 | | | 9/30/04 | |
Boston | | | 95.9 | % | | | n/a | | | | n/a | | | | n/a | |
New York / New Jersey | | | 87.7 | % | | | 87.9 | % | | | 94.9 | % | | | 94.9 | % |
San Francisco | | | 89.1 | % | | | 88.4 | % | | | 88.8 | % | | | 87.7 | % |
Pennsylvania | | | 90.6 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
San Diego | | | 91.9 | % | | | 87.7 | % | | | 96.4 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
Seattle | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
Maryland | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | n/a | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 92.3 | % | | | 91.5 | % | | | 95.3 | % | | | 94.7 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Historical Redevelopment | |
| | 6/30/05 | | | 3/31/05 | | | 12/31/04 | | | 9/30/04 | |
Boston | | | — | | | | n/a | | | | n/a | | | | n/a | |
New York / New Jersey | | | 7.5 | % | | | 7.5 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
San Francisco | | | 7.6 | % | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Pennsylvania | | | 9.4 | % | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
San Diego | | | 2.8 | % | | | 8.8 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
Seattle | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Maryland | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | n/a | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 4.3 | % | | | 3.7 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Historical Vacancy | |
| | 6/30/05 | | | 3/31/05 | | | 12/31/04 | | | 9/30/04 | |
Boston | | | 4.1 | % | | | n/a | | | | n/a | | | | n/a | |
New York / New Jersey | | | 4.8 | % | | | 4.7 | % | | | 5.1 | % | | | 5.1 | % |
San Francisco | | | 3.3 | % | | | 11.6 | % | | | 11.2 | % | | | 12.3 | % |
Pennsylvania | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
San Diego | | | 5.3 | % | | | 3.5 | % | | | 3.6 | % | | | — | |
Seattle | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Maryland | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | n/a | |
Total | | | 3.4 | % | | | 4.8 | % | | | 4.7 | % | | | 5.3 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
17
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
LEASE EXPIRATIONS
JUNE 30, 2005
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Rentable | | | Percent of | | | | | | | Percent of | | | Current | | | | | | | Percent of | | | Annualized | |
| | Square Feet | | | Total | | | Current | | | Current | | | Base Rent | | | Annualized | | | Annualized | | | Base Rent per | |
| | of Expiring | | | Rentable | | | Annualized | | | Annualized | | | per Leased | | | Base Rent | | | Base Rent | | | Leased Sq Ft | |
Year of Lease Expiration | | Leases | | | Sq Ft | | | Base Rent | | | Base Rent | | | Sq Ft | | | at Expiration | | | at Expiration | | | at Expiration | |
| | | | | | | | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | |
Vacant | | | 143,404 | | | | 3.4 | % | | $ | — | | | | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | | — | | | $ | — | |
Redevelopment | | | 183,838 | | | | 4.3 | % | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
2005 | | | 140,198 | | | | 3.3 | % | | | 2,306 | | | | 2.1 | % | | | 16.45 | | | | 2,376 | | | | 1.9 | % | | | 16.95 | |
2006 | | | 161,503 | | | | 3.8 | % | | | 2,806 | | | | 2.6 | % | | | 17.38 | | | | 2,853 | | | | 2.3 | % | | | 17.66 | |
2007 | | | 347,399 | | | | 8.2 | % | | | 7,231 | | | | 6.6 | % | | | 20.81 | | | | 7,774 | | | | 6.2 | % | | | 22.38 | |
2008 | | | 247,855 | | | | 5.8 | % | | | 7,325 | | | | 6.7 | % | | | 29.56 | | | | 7,682 | | | | 6.2 | % | | | 30.99 | |
2009 | | | 410,096 | | | | 9.6 | % | | | 9,020 | | | | 8.2 | % | | | 22.00 | | | | 9,391 | | | | 7.5 | % | | | 22.90 | |
2010 | | | 766,586 | | | | 18.0 | % | | | 17,810 | | | | 16.3 | % | | | 23.23 | | | | 18,662 | | | | 15.0 | % | | | 24.34 | |
2011 | | | 84,001 | | | | 2.0 | % | | | 4,144 | | | | 3.8 | % | | | 49.34 | | | | 5,019 | | | | 4.0 | % | | | 59.75 | |
2012 | | | 221,496 | | | | 5.2 | % | | | 5,989 | | | | 5.5 | % | | | 27.04 | | | | 6,975 | | | | 5.6 | % | | | 31.49 | |
2013 | | | 222,299 | | | | 5.2 | % | | | 4,903 | | | | 4.5 | % | | | 22.06 | | | | 6,437 | | | | 5.2 | % | | | 28.96 | |
2014 | | | 238,252 | | | | 5.6 | % | | | 6,826 | | | | 6.2 | % | | | 28.65 | | | | 8,318 | | | | 6.7 | % | | | 34.91 | |
Thereafter | | | 1,089,062 | | | | 25.6 | % | | | 41,113 | | | | 37.5 | % | | | 37.75 | | | | 49,074 | | | | 39.4 | % | | | 45.06 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / weighted average | | | 4,255,989 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 109,473 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 27.86 | | | $ | 124,560 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 31.70 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Rentable Square Feet Expiring | |
| | Expiration Year | | | | |
Market | | 2005 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | Thereafter | | | Total | |
Boston | | | 1,526 | | | | 17,979 | | | | 17,800 | | | | — | | | | 41,532 | | | | 1,139,796 | | | | 1,218,633 | |
New York / New Jersey | | | 51,005 | | | | 16,563 | | | | 235,792 | | | | 2,246 | | | | 297,021 | | | | 119,577 | | | | 722,204 | |
San Francisco | | | 46,504 | | | | 61,444 | | | | 27,969 | | | | — | | | | 55,588 | | | | 448,465 | | | | 639,970 | |
Pennsylvania | | | 17,230 | | | | 27,750 | | | | 4,000 | | | | 95,711 | | | | — | | | | 361,938 | | | | 506,629 | |
San Diego | | | 23,933 | | | | 37,767 | | | | 61,838 | | | | 14,909 | | | | 15,955 | | | | 332,103 | | | | 486,505 | |
Seattle | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 134,989 | | | | — | | | | 51,000 | | | | 185,989 | |
Maryland | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 168,817 | | | | 168,817 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 140,198 | | | | 161,503 | | | | 347,399 | | | | 247,855 | | | | 410,096 | | | | 2,621,696 | | | | 3,928,747 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | % of Total Portfolio Current Base Rent Expiring | |
| | Expiration Year | | | | |
Market | | 2005 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | Thereafter | | | Total | |
Boston | | | — | | | | 0.2 | % | | | 0.4 | % | | | — | | | | 1.6 | % | | | 40.0 | % | | | 42.2 | % |
New York / New Jersey | | | 0.8 | % | | | 0.4 | % | | | 3.6 | % | | | — | | | | 5.4 | % | | | 2.7 | % | | | 12.9 | % |
San Francisco | | | 0.4 | % | | | 0.5 | % | | | 0.4 | % | | | — | | | | 0.9 | % | | | 10.8 | % | | | 13.0 | % |
Pennsylvania | | | 0.2 | % | | | 0.3 | % | | | 0.1 | % | | | 1.1 | % | | | — | | | | 7.6 | % | | | 9.3 | % |
San Diego | | | 0.7 | % | | | 1.2 | % | | | 2.1 | % | | | 0.7 | % | | | 0.3 | % | | | 8.8 | % | | | 13.8 | % |
Seattle | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 4.9 | % | | | — | | | | 1.5 | % | | | 6.4 | % |
Maryland | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2.4 | % | | | 2.4 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 2.1 | % | | | 2.6 | % | | | 6.6 | % | | | 6.7 | % | | | 8.2 | % | | | 73.8 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
18
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
PORTFOLIO BY SIZE
JUNE 30, 2005
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Percent of | | | Current | | | | | | | Percent of | | | Annualized | |
| | Rentable | | | Percent of | | | Current | | | Current | | | Annualized | | | Annualized | | | Annualized | | | Base Rent per | |
| | Square | | | Rentable | | | Annualized | | | Annualized | | | Base Rent per | | | Base Rent | | | Base Rent | | | Leased Sq Ft | |
Square Feet | | Feet | | | Sq Ft | | | Base Rent | | | Base Rent | | | Leased Sq Ft | | | at Expiration | | | at Expiration | | | at Expiration | |
| | | | | | | | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | |
Vacant | | | 143,404 | | | | 3.4 | % | | $ | — | | | | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | | — | | | $ | — | |
Redevelopment | | | 183,838 | | | | 4.3 | % | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
2,500 or less | | | 20,263 | | | | 0.5 | % | | | 451 | | | | 0.4 | % | | | 22.28 | | | | 479 | | | | 0.4 | % | | | 23.64 | |
2,501 to 5,000 | | | 27,796 | | | | 0.7 | % | | | 599 | | | | 0.5 | % | | | 21.56 | | | | 657 | | | | 0.5 | % | | | 23.63 | |
5,001 to 7,500 | | | 26,467 | | | | 0.6 | % | | | 706 | | | | 0.6 | % | | | 26.67 | | | | 833 | | | | 0.7 | % | | | 31.49 | |
7,501 to 10,000 | | | 17,202 | | | | 0.4 | % | | | 240 | | | | 0.2 | % | | | 13.96 | | | | 264 | | | | 0.2 | % | | | 15.33 | |
10,001 to 20,000 | | | 189,213 | | | | 4.4 | % | | | 4,481 | | | | 4.1 | % | | | 23.68 | | | | 4,747 | | | | 3.8 | % | | | 25.09 | |
20,001 to 40,000 | | | 375,762 | | | | 8.8 | % | | | 7,534 | | | | 6.9 | % | | | 20.05 | | | | 8,697 | | | | 7.0 | % | | | 23.14 | |
40,001 to 60,000 | | | 569,891 | | | | 13.4 | % | | | 16,077 | | | | 14.7 | % | | | 28.21 | | | | 20,294 | | | | 16.3 | % | | | 35.61 | |
60,001 to 80,000 | | | 834,025 | | | | 19.6 | % | | | 24,168 | | | | 22.1 | % | | | 28.98 | | | | 28,068 | | | | 22.5 | % | | | 33.65 | |
80,001 to 100,000 | | | 178,614 | | | | 4.2 | % | | | 2,735 | | | | 2.5 | % | | | 15.31 | | | | 3,281 | | | | 2.6 | % | | | 18.37 | |
100,001 to 200,000 | | | 724,400 | | | | 17.0 | % | | | 14,721 | | | | 13.4 | % | | | 20.32 | | | | 16,217 | | | | 13.0 | % | | | 22.39 | |
200,001 or greater | | | 965,114 | | | | 22.7 | % | | | 37,761 | | | | 34.6 | % | | | 39.13 | | | | 41,022 | | | | 33.0 | % | | | 42.51 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / weighted average | | | 4,255,989 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 109,473 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 27.86 | | | $ | 124,560 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 31.70 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
19
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
BOSTON MARKET
JUNE 30, 2005
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Current | | | | | | | Annualized | | | | |
| | | | | | Rentable | | | Percent of | | | | | | | Current | | | Annualized | | | Annualized | | | Base Rent per | | | Encumbered | |
| | | | | | Square | | | Rentable | | | Percent | | | Annualized | | | Base Rent per | | | Base Rent | | | Leased Sq Ft | | | with Secured | |
| | Buildings | | | Feet | | | Sq Ft | | | Leased | | | Base Rent | | | Leased Sq Ft | | | at Expiration | | | at Expiration | | | Debt | |
Boston | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | |
Albany Street | | | 2 | | | | 75,003 | | | | 5.9 | % | | | 99.8 | % | | $ | 3,460 | | | $ | 46.21 | | | $ | 3,460 | | | $ | 46.21 | | | | N | |
Coolidge Avenue | | | 1 | | | | 37,400 | | | | 2.9 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 935 | | | | 25.00 | | | | 1,047 | | | | 28.00 | | | | N | |
21 Erie Street | | | 1 | | | | 48,238 | | | | 3.8 | % | | | 58.1 | % | | | 783 | | | | 27.94 | | | | 783 | | | | 27.94 | | | | N | |
40 Erie Street | | | 1 | | | | 100,854 | | | | 7.9 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 4,098 | | | | 40.64 | | | | 3,800 | | | | 37.67 | | | | Y | |
Fresh Pond Research Park | | | 6 | | | | 90,702 | | | | 7.1 | % | | | 83.3 | % | | | 1,023 | | | | 13.54 | | | | 1,660 | | | | 21.97 | | | | N | |
Kendall Square A | | | 1 | | | | 302,919 | | | | 23.9 | % | | | 96.7 | % | | | 14,536 | | | | 49.61 | | | | 14,536 | | | | 49.61 | | | | N | |
Kendall Square D | | | 1 | | | | 349,325 | | | | 27.6 | % | | | 98.2 | % | | | 15,399 | | | | 44.89 | | | | 18,717 | | | | 54.57 | | | | Y | |
Lucent Drive | | | 1 | | | | 21,500 | | | | 1.7 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 548 | | | | 25.50 | | | | 548 | | | | 25.50 | | | | Y | |
Sidney Street | | | 1 | | | | 191,904 | | | | 15.1 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 4,063 | | | | 21.17 | | | | 4,063 | | | | 21.17 | | | | Y | |
Vassar Street | | | 1 | | | | 52,520 | | | | 4.1 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 1,372 | | | | 26.13 | | | | 1,676 | | | | 31.92 | | | | N | |
47 Erie Street Parking Structure | | | 1 | | | 447 stalls | | | n/a | | | | n/a | | | | 1,063 | | | | n/a | | | | 1,063 | | | | n/a | | | | N | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / weighted average | | | 17 | | | | 1,270,365 | | | | 100.0 | % | | | 95.9 | % | | $ | 47,280 | | | $ | 37.93 | | | $ | 51,353 | | | $ | 42.14 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
LEASE EXPIRATIONS
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Rentable | | | | | | | | | | | Percent of | | | Annualized | |
| | Sq Ft of | | | Percent of | | | Current | | | Current | | | Base Rent per | | | Base Rent per | |
| | Expiring | | | Rentable | | | Annualized | | | Annualized | | | Leased Sq Ft | | | Leased Sq Ft | |
Year of Lease Expiration | | Leases | | | Sq Ft | | | Base Rent | | | Base Rent | | | Current | | | at Expiration | |
| | | | | | | | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
47 Erie Street Parking Structure | | | n/a | | | | n/a | | | $ | 1,063 | | | | 2.2 | % | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
Vacant | | | 51,732 | | | | 4.1 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
Redevelopment | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
2005 | | | 1,526 | | | | 0.1 | % | | | 40 | | | | 0.1 | % | | | 26.40 | | | | 26.40 | |
2006 | | | 17,979 | | | | 1.4 | % | | | 203 | | | | 0.4 | % | | | 11.27 | | | | 11.27 | |
2007 | | | 17,800 | | | | 1.4 | % | | | 472 | | | | 1.0 | % | | | 26.50 | | | | 28.66 | |
2008 | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
2009 | | | 41,532 | | | | 3.3 | % | | | 1,723 | | | | 3.6 | % | | | 41.49 | | | | 41.49 | |
2010 | | | 383,214 | | | | 30.2 | % | | | 9,094 | | | | 19.2 | % | | | 23.73 | | | | 25.60 | |
2011 | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
2012 | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
2013 | | | 73,347 | | | | 5.8 | % | | | 3,420 | | | | 7.2 | % | | | 46.62 | | | | 46.62 | |
2014 | | | 49,519 | | | | 3.9 | % | | | 1,331 | | | | 2.8 | % | | | 26.88 | | | | 26.88 | |
Thereafter | | | 633,716 | | | | 49.8 | % | | | 29,935 | | | | 63.3 | % | | | 47.24 | | | | 52.47 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / weighted average | | | 1,270,365 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 47,280 | | | | 99.8 | % | | $ | 37.93 | | | $ | 42.14 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
20
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
NEW YORK / NEW JERSEY MARKET
JUNE 30, 2005
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Current | | | | | | | Annualized | | | | |
| | | | | | Rentable | | | Percent of | | | | | | | Current | | | Annualized | | | Annualized | | | Base Rent per | | | Encumbered | |
| | | | | | Square | | | Rentable | | | Percent | | | Annualized | | | Base Rent per | | | Base Rent | | | Leased Sq Ft | | | with Secured | |
| | Buildings | | | Feet | | | Sq Ft | | | Leased | | | Base Rent | | | Leased Sq Ft | | | at Expiration | | | at Expiration | | | Debt | |
New York / New Jersey | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | |
Graphics Drive | | | 1 | | | | 72,300 | | | | 8.8 | % | | | 14.8 | % | | $ | 148 | | | $ | 13.86 | | | $ | 148 | | | $ | 13.86 | | | | N | |
Landmark at Eastview | | | 8 | | | | 751,648 | | | | 91.2 | % | | | 94.7 | % | | | 14,103 | | | | 19.82 | | | | 15,255 | | | | 21.44 | | | | N | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / weighted average | | | 9 | | | | 823,948 | | | | 100.0 | % | | | 87.7 | % | | $ | 14,252 | | | $ | 18.18 | | | $ | 15,403 | | | $ | 21.33 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
LEASE EXPIRATIONS
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Rentable | | | | | | | | | | | Percent of | | | Annualized | |
| | Sq Ft of | | | Percent of | | | Current | | | Current | | | Base Rent per | | | Base Rent per | |
| | Expiring | | | Rentable | | | Annualized | | | Annualized | | | Leased Sq Ft | | | Leased Sq Ft | |
Year of Lease Expiration | | Leases | | | Sq Ft | | | Base Rent | | | Base Rent | | | Current | | | at Expiration | |
| | | | | | | | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Vacant | | | 40,128 | | | | 4.9 | % | | $ | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
Redevelopment | | | 61,616 | | | | 7.5 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
2005 | | | 51,005 | | | | 6.2 | % | | | 822 | | | | 5.8 | % | | | 16.13 | | | | 17.50 | |
2006 | | | 16,563 | | | | 2.0 | % | | | 434 | | | | 3.0 | % | | | 26.20 | | | | 26.20 | |
2007 | | | 235,792 | | | | 28.6 | % | | | 4,057 | | | | 28.5 | % | | | 17.20 | | | | 18.64 | |
2008 | | | 2,246 | | | | 0.3 | % | | | 47 | | | | 0.3 | % | | | 20.76 | | | | 14.40 | |
2009 | | | 297,021 | | | | 36.0 | % | | | 5,915 | | | | 41.5 | % | | | 19.91 | | | | 20.59 | |
2010 | | | 9,125 | | | | 1.1 | % | | | 190 | | | | 1.3 | % | | | 20.87 | | | | 16.57 | |
2011 | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
2012 | | | 110,452 | | | | 13.4 | % | | | 2,786 | | | | 19.6 | % | | | 25.23 | | | | 30.28 | |
2013 | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
2014 | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
Thereafter | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / weighted average | | | 823,948 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 14,252 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 18.18 | | | $ | 21.33 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
21
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
SAN FRANCISCO MARKET
JUNE 30, 2005
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Current | | | | | | | Annualized | | | | |
| | | | | | Rentable | | | Percent of | | | | | | | Current | | | Annualized | | | Annualized | | | Base Rent per | | | Encumbered | |
| | | | | | Square | | | Rentable | | | Percent | | | Annualized | | | Base Rent per | | | Base Rent | | | Leased Sq Ft | | | with Secured | |
| | Buildings | | | Feet | | | Sq Ft | | | Leased | | | Base Rent | | | Leased Sq Ft | | | at Expiration | | | at Expiration | | | Debt | |
San Francisco | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | |
Ardentech Court | | | 1 | | | | 55,588 | | | | 7.7 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 1,010 | | | $ | 18.17 | | | $ | 1,142 | | | $ | 20.54 | | | | Y | |
Bayshore Boulevard | | | 3 | | | | 183,344 | | | | 25.5 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 4,331 | | | | 23.62 | | | | 6,118 | | | | 33.37 | | | | Y | |
Bridgeview | | | 3 | | | | 263,073 | | | | 36.7 | % | | | 91.1 | % | | | 2,752 | | | | 12.78 | | | | 4,730 | | | | 21.97 | | | | Y | |
Dumbarton Circle | | | 1 | | | | 44,000 | | | | 6.1 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 632 | | | | 14.37 | | | | 1,003 | | | | 22.80 | | | | N | |
Industrial Road | | | 1 | | | | 171,965 | | | | 24.0 | % | | | 82.4 | % | | | 5,480 | | | | 38.67 | | | | 6,416 | | | | 45.26 | | | | N | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / weighted average | | | 9 | | | | 717,970 | | | | 100.0 | % | | | 89.1 | % | | $ | 14,206 | | | $ | 22.20 | | | $ | 19,409 | | | $ | 30.33 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
LEASE EXPIRATIONS
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Rentable | | | | | | | | | | | Percent of | | | Annualized | |
| | Sq Ft of | | | Percent of | | | Current | | | Current | | | Base Rent per | | | Base Rent per | |
| | Expiring | | | Rentable | | | Annualized | | | Annualized | | | Leased Sq Ft | | | Leased Sq Ft | |
Year of Lease Expiration | | Leases | | | Sq Ft | | | Base Rent | | | Base Rent | | | Current | | | at Expiration | |
| | | | | | | | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Vacant | | | 23,341 | | | | 3.3 | % | | $ | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
Redevelopment | | | 54,659 | | | | 7.6 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
2005 | | | 46,504 | | | | 6.5 | % | | | 454 | | | | 3.2 | % | | | 9.77 | | | | 9.77 | |
2006 | | | 61,444 | | | | 8.6 | % | | | 516 | | | | 3.6 | % | | | 8.40 | | | | 8.40 | |
2007 | | | 27,969 | | | | 3.9 | % | | | 386 | | | | 2.7 | % | | | 13.80 | | | | 15.00 | |
2008 | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
2009 | | | 55,588 | | | | 7.7 | % | | | 1,010 | | | | 7.1 | % | | | 18.17 | | | | 20.54 | |
2010 | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
2011 | | | 55,898 | | | | 7.8 | % | | | 3,335 | | | | 23.5 | % | | | 59.66 | | | | 72.59 | |
2012 | | | 61,826 | | | | 8.6 | % | | | 1,743 | | | | 12.3 | % | | | 28.20 | | | | 28.62 | |
2013 | | | 148,952 | | | | 20.7 | % | | | 1,483 | | | | 10.4 | % | | | 9.96 | | | | 20.26 | |
2014 | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
Thereafter | | | 181,789 | | | | 25.3 | % | | | 5,279 | | | | 37.2 | % | | | 29.04 | | | | 44.19 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / weighted average | | | 717,970 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 14,206 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 22.20 | | | $ | 30.33 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
22
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
PENNSYLVANIA MARKET
JUNE 30, 2005
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Current | | | | | | | Annualized | | | | |
| | | | | | Rentable | | | Percent of | | | | | | | Current | | | Annualized | | | Annualized | | | Base Rent per | | | Encumbered | |
| | | | | | Square | | | Rentable | | | Percent | | | Annualized | | | Base Rent per | | | Base Rent | | | Leased Sq Ft | | | with Secured | |
| | Buildings | | | Feet | | | Sq Ft | | | Leased | | | Base Rent | | | Leased Sq Ft | | | at Expiration | | | at Expiration | | | Debt | |
Pennsylvania | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | |
Eisenhower Road | | | 1 | | | | 27,750 | | | | 5.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 377 | | | $ | 13.60 | | | $ | 389 | | | $ | 14.00 | | | | Y | |
King of Prussia | | | 5 | | | | 427,109 | | | | 76.3 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 9,060 | | | | 21.21 | | | | 9,003 | | | | 21.08 | | | | N | |
Phoenixville Pike | | | 1 | | | | 104,400 | | | | 18.7 | % | | | 49.6 | % | | | 845 | | | | 16.32 | | | | 1,184 | | | | 22.87 | | | | N | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / weighted average | | | 7 | | | | 559,259 | | | | 100.0 | % | | | 90.6 | % | | $ | 10,282 | | | $ | 20.30 | | | $ | 10,575 | | | $ | 20.87 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
LEASE EXPIRATIONS
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Rentable | | | | | | | | | | | Percent of | | | Annualized | |
| | Sq Ft of | | | Percent of | | | Current | | | Current | | | Base Rent per | | | Base Rent per | |
| | Expiring | | | Rentable | | | Annualized | | | Annualized | | | Leased Sq Ft | | | Leased Sq Ft | |
Year of Lease Expiration | | Leases | | | Sq Ft | | | Base Rent | | | Base Rent | | | Current | | | at Expiration | |
| | | | | | | | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Vacant | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | $ | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
Redevelopment | | | 52,630 | | | | 9.4 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
2005 | | | 17,230 | | | | 3.1 | % | | | 270 | | | | 2.6 | % | | | 15.65 | | | | 15.65 | |
2006 | | | 27,750 | | | | 5.0 | % | | | 377 | | | | 3.7 | % | | | 13.60 | | | | 14.00 | |
2007 | | | 4,000 | | | | 0.7 | % | | | 66 | | | | 0.6 | % | | | 16.60 | | | | 21.60 | |
2008 | | | 95,711 | | | | 17.1 | % | | | 1,234 | | | | 12.0 | % | | | 12.89 | | | | 12.89 | |
2009 | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
2010 | | | 354,858 | | | | 63.4 | % | | | 8,249 | | | | 80.3 | % | | | 23.24 | | | | 23.66 | |
2011 | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
2012 | | | 7,080 | | | | 1.3 | % | | | 86 | | | | 0.8 | % | | | 12.20 | | | | 28.42 | |
2013 | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
2014 | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
Thereafter | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / weighted average | | | 559,259 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 10,282 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 20.30 | | | $ | 20.87 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
23
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
SAN DIEGO MARKET
JUNE 30, 2005
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Current | | | | | | | Annualized | | | | |
| | | | | | Rentable | | | Percent of | | | | | | | Current | | | Annualized | | | Annualized | | | Base Rent per | | | Encumbered | |
| | | | | | Square | | | Rentable | | | Percent | | | Annualized | | | Base Rent per | | | Base Rent | | | Leased Sq Ft | | | with Secured | |
| | Buildings | | | Feet | | | Sq Ft | | | Leased | | | Base Rent | | | Leased Sq Ft | | | at Expiration | | | at Expiration | | | Debt | |
San Diego | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | |
Balboa Avenue | | | 1 | | | | 35,344 | | | | 6.7 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 649 | | | $ | 18.37 | | | $ | 716 | | | $ | 20.26 | | | | N | |
Bernardo Center Drive | | | 1 | | | | 61,286 | | | | 11.6 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 2,219 | | | | 36.20 | | | | 2,330 | | | | 38.01 | | | | N | |
McKellar Court (1) | | | 1 | | | | 72,863 | | | | 13.8 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 1,671 | | | | 22.94 | | | | 1,997 | | | | 27.41 | | | | Y | |
Nancy Ridge Drive | | | 1 | | | | 42,138 | | | | 8.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 1,372 | | | | 32.56 | | | | 1,660 | | | | 39.39 | | | | Y | |
San Diego Science Center | | | 1 | | | | 105,364 | | | | 19.9 | % | | | 73.2 | % | | | 2,782 | | | | 36.05 | | | | 2,867 | | | | 37.16 | | | | N | |
Science Center Drive | | | 1 | | | | 53,740 | | | | 10.1 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 1,660 | | | | 30.88 | | | | 1,660 | | | | 30.88 | | | | Y | |
Towne Centre Drive | | | 3 | | | | 115,870 | | | | 21.8 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 3,824 | | | | 33.00 | | | | 4,989 | | | | 43.06 | | | | Y | |
Waples Street | | | 1 | | | | 43,036 | | | | 8.1 | % | | | 65.3 | % | | | 809 | | | | 28.80 | | | | 961 | | | | 34.21 | | | | N | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / weighted average | | | 10 | | | | 529,641 | | | | 100.0 | % | | | 91.9 | % | | $ | 14,986 | | | $ | 29.89 | | | $ | 17,180 | | | $ | 35.31 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
LEASE EXPIRATIONS
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Rentable | | | | | | | | | | | Percent of | | | Annualized | |
| | Sq Ft of | | | Percent of | | | Current | | | Current | | | Base Rent per | | | Base Rent per | |
| | Expiring | | | Rentable | | | Annualized | | | Annualized | | | Leased Sq Ft | | | Leased Sq Ft | |
Year of Lease Expiration | | Leases | | | Sq Ft | | | Base Rent | | | Base Rent | | | Current | | | at Expiration | |
| | | | | | | | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Vacant | | | 28,203 | | | | 5.3 | % | | $ | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
Redevelopment | | | 14,933 | | | | 2.8 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
2005 | | | 23,933 | | | | 4.5 | % | | | 719 | | | | 4.8 | % | | | 30.05 | | | | 30.05 | |
2006 | | | 37,767 | | | | 7.1 | % | | | 1,277 | | | | 8.5 | % | | | 33.80 | | | | 34.74 | |
2007 | | | 61,838 | | | | 11.7 | % | | | 2,250 | | | | 15.0 | % | | | 36.38 | | | | 38.21 | |
2008 | | | 14,909 | | | | 2.8 | % | | | 755 | | | | 5.0 | % | | | 50.65 | | | | 53.87 | |
2009 | | | 15,955 | | | | 3.0 | % | | | 373 | | | | 2.5 | % | | | 23.35 | | | | 25.78 | |
2010 | | | 19,389 | | | | 3.7 | % | | | 277 | | | | 1.8 | % | | | 14.28 | | | | 15.72 | |
2011 | | | 28,103 | | | | 5.3 | % | | | 809 | | | | 5.4 | % | | | 28.80 | | | | 34.21 | |
2012 | | | 42,138 | | | | 8.0 | % | | | 1,372 | | | | 9.2 | % | | | 32.56 | | | | 39.39 | |
2013 | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
2014 | | | 188,733 | | | | 35.7 | % | | | 5,495 | | | | 36.7 | % | | | 29.12 | | | | 37.02 | |
Thereafter | | | 53,740 | | | | 10.1 | % | | | 1,660 | | | | 11.1 | % | | | 30.88 | | | | 30.88 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / weighted average | | | 529,641 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 14,986 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 29.89 | | | $ | 35.31 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | This property is an unconsolidated partnership, of which we own 21%. |
24
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
SEATTLE MARKET
JUNE 30, 2005
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Current | | | | | | | Annualized | | | | |
| | | | | | Rentable | | | Percent of | | | | | | | Current | | | Annualized | | | Annualized | | | Base Rent per | | | Encumbered | |
| | | | | | Square | | | Rentable | | | Percent | | | Annualized | | | Base Rent per | | | Base Rent | | | Leased Sq Ft | | | with Secured | |
| | Buildings | | | Feet | | | Sq Ft | | | Leased | | | Base Rent | | | Leased Sq Ft | | | at Expiration | | | at Expiration | | | Debt | |
Seattle | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | |
Elliott Avenue | | | 1 | | | | 134,989 | | | | 72.6 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 5,290 | | | $ | 39.19 | | | $ | 5,613 | | | $ | 41.58 | | | | Y | |
Monte Villa Parkway | | | 1 | | | | 51,000 | | | | 27.4 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 1,615 | | | | 31.67 | | | | 2,119 | | | | 41.56 | | | | Y | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / weighted average | | | 2 | | | | 185,989 | | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 6,905 | | | $ | 37.13 | | | $ | 7,732 | | | $ | 41.57 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
LEASE EXPIRATIONS
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Rentable | | | | | | | | | | | Percent of | | | Annualized | |
| | Sq Ft of | | | Percent of | | | Current | | | Current | | | Base Rent per | | | Base Rent per | |
| | Expiring | | | Rentable | | | Annualized | | | Annualized | | | Leased Sq Ft | | | Leased Sq Ft | |
Year of Lease Expiration | | Leases | | | Sq Ft | | | Base Rent | | | Base Rent | | | Current | | | at Expiration | |
| | | | | | | | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Vacant | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | $ | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
Redevelopment | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
2005 | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
2006 | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
2007 | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
2008 | | | 134,989 | | | | 72.6 | % | | | 5,290 | | | | 76.6 | % | | | 39.19 | | | | 41.58 | |
2009 | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
2010 | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
2011 | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
2012 | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
2013 | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
2014 | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
Thereafter | | | 51,000 | | | | 27.4 | % | | | 1,615 | | | | 23.4 | % | | | 31.67 | | | | 41.56 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / weighted average | | | 185,989 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 6,905 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 37.13 | | | $ | 41.57 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
25
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
MARYLAND MARKET
JUNE 30, 2005
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Current | | | | | | | Annualized | | | | |
| | | | | | Rentable | | | Percent of | | | | | | | Current | | | Annualized | | | Annualized | | | Base Rent per | | | Encumbered | |
| | | | | | Square | | | Rentable | | | Percent | | | Annualized | | | Base Rent per | | | Base Rent | | | Leased Sq Ft | | | with Secured | |
| | Buildings | | | Feet | | | Sq Ft | | | Leased | | | Base Rent | | | Leased Sq Ft | | | at Expiration | | | at Expiration | | | Debt | |
Maryland | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | |
Beckley Street | | | 1 | | | | 77,225 | | | | 45.7 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 1,575 | | | $ | 20.39 | | | $ | 2,382 | | | $ | 30.85 | | | | N | |
Tributary Street | | | 1 | | | | 91,592 | | | | 54.3 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 1,050 | | | | 11.46 | | | | 1,588 | | | | 17.34 | | | | N | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / weighted average | | | 2 | | | | 168,817 | | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 2,625 | | | $ | 15.55 | | | $ | 3,971 | | | $ | 23.52 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
LEASE EXPIRATIONS
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Rentable | | | | | | | | | | | Percent of | | | Annualized | |
| | Sq Ft of | | | Percent of | | | Current | | | Current | | | Base Rent per | | | Base Rent per | |
| | Expiring | | | Rentable | | | Annualized | | | Annualized | | | Leased Sq Ft | | | Leased Sq Ft | |
Year of Lease Expiration | | Leases | | | Sq Ft | | | Base Rent | | | Base Rent | | | Current | | | at Expiration | |
| | | | | | | | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Vacant | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | $ | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
Redevelopment | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
2005 | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
2006 | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
2007 | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
2008 | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
2009 | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
2010 | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
2011 | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
2012 | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
2013 | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
2014 | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
Thereafter | | | 168,817 | | | | 100.0 | % | | | 2,625 | | | | 100.0 | % | | | 15.55 | | | | 23.52 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / weighted average | | | 168,817 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 2,625 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 15.55 | | | $ | 23.52 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
26
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
20 LARGEST TENANTS (1)
JUNE 30, 2005
As of June 30, 2005, our properties were leased to 78 tenants.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Current | | | Percent of | | | | | | | Annualized | | | Percent of | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Annualized | | | Current | | | | | | | Base Rent | | | Annualized | | | |
| | | | | | Leased | | | Percent of | | | Current | | | Base Rent | | | Annualized | | | Annualized | | | per Leased | | | Base Rent | | | |
| | | | | | Square | | | Total | | | Annualized | | | per Leased | | | Base Rent | | | Base Rent | | | Sq Ft | | | at Expiration | | | Expiration |
| | Tenant | | Market | | Feet | | | Portfolio | | | Base Rent | | | Sq Ft | | | Total Portfolio | | | at Expiration | | | at Expiration | | | Total Portfolio | | | Date |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 | | Vertex Pharmaceuticals | | Boston | | | 583,474 | | | | 13.7 | % | | $ | 22,697 | | | $ | 38.90 | | | | 20.7 | % | | $ | 22,398 | | | $ | 38.39 | | | | 18.0 | % | | April 2018(2) |
2 | | Genzyme Corporation | | Boston | | | 343,000 | | | | 8.1 | % | | | 15,399 | | | | 44.89 | | | | 14.1 | % | | | 18,717 | | | | 54.57 | | | | 15.0 | % | | July 2018 |
3 | | Centocor, Inc. (Johnson & Johnson) | | Pennsylvania | | | 331,398 | | | | 7.8 | % | | | 7,826 | | | | 23.62 | | | | 7.1 | % | | | 7,769 | | | | 23.44 | | | | 6.2 | % | | March 2010 |
4 | | Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | | New York / New Jersey | | | 211,813 | | | | 5.0 | % | | | 3,950 | | | | 18.65 | | | | 3.6 | % | | | 4,348 | | | | 20.53 | | | | 3.5 | % | | December 2007(3) |
5 | | Illumina, Inc. | | San Diego | | | 115,870 | | | | 2.7 | % | | | 3,824 | | | | 33.00 | | | | 3.5 | % | | | 4,989 | | | | 43.06 | | | | 4.0 | % | | August 2014 |
6 | | Nektar Therapeutics | | San Francisco | | | 79,917 | | | | 1.9 | % | | | 3,737 | | | | 46.76 | | | | 3.4 | % | | | 4,646 | | | | 58.14 | | | | 3.7 | % | | October 2016 |
7 | | Millenium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | | Boston | | | 73,347 | | | | 1.7 | % | | | 3,420 | | | | 46.62 | | | | 3.1 | % | | | 3,420 | | | | 46.62 | | | | 2.7 | % | | September 2013 |
8 | | Chemtura Corporation | | New York / New Jersey | | | 182,829 | | | | 4.3 | % | | | 3,377 | | | | 18.47 | | | | 3.1 | % | | | 3,377 | | | | 18.47 | | | | 2.7 | % | | December 2009 |
9 | | Intermune, Inc. | | San Francisco | | | 55,898 | | | | 1.3 | % | | | 3,335 | | | | 59.66 | | | | 3.0 | % | | | 4,058 | | | | 72.59 | | | | 3.3 | % | | April 2011 |
10 | | Chiron Corporation | | Seattle | | | 71,153 | | | | 1.7 | % | | | 2,944 | | | | 41.38 | | | | 2.7 | % | | | 3,123 | | | | 43.89 | | | | 2.5 | % | | March 2008 |
11 | | Guilford Pharmaceuticals | | Maryland | | | 168,817 | | | | 4.0 | % | | | 2,625 | | | | 15.55 | | | | 2.4 | % | | | 3,971 | | | | 23.52 | | | | 3.2 | % | | December 2019 |
12 | | Cell Therapeutics, Inc. | | Seattle | | | 63,836 | | | | 1.5 | % | | | 2,346 | | | | 36.75 | | | | 2.1 | % | | | 2,490 | | | | 39.00 | | | | 2.0 | % | | January 2008 |
13 | | University of California Regents | | San Diego | | | 61,286 | | | | 1.4 | % | | | 2,219 | | | | 36.20 | | | | 2.0 | % | | | 2,330 | | | | 38.01 | | | | 1.9 | % | | April 2007 |
14 | | ACS | | New York / New Jersey | | | 71,399 | | | | 1.7 | % | | | 1,791 | | | | 25.08 | | | | 1.6 | % | | | 2,056 | | | | 28.79 | | | | 1.7 | % | | December 2012 |
15 | | Nuvelo, Inc. | | San Francisco | | | 61,826 | | | | 1.5 | % | | | 1,743 | | | | 28.20 | | | | 1.6 | % | | | 1,769 | | | | 28.62 | | | | 1.4 | % | | August 2012 |
16 | | Emisphere Technologies, Inc. | | New York / New Jersey | | | 87,022 | | | | 2.0 | % | | | 1,685 | | | | 19.36 | | | | 1.5 | % | | | 1,693 | | | | 19.45 | | | | 1.4 | % | | August 2007 |
17 | | Quidel Corporation (4) | | San Diego | | | 72,863 | | | | 1.7 | % | | | 1,671 | | | | 22.94 | | | | 1.5 | % | | | 1,997 | | | | 27.41 | | | | 1.6 | % | | December 2014 |
18 | | Ligand Pharmaceuticals | | San Diego | | | 53,740 | | | | 1.3 | % | | | 1,660 | | | | 30.88 | | | | 1.5 | % | | | 1,660 | | | | 30.88 | | | | 1.3 | % | | August 2015 |
19 | | Nastech Phamaceutical | | Seattle | | | 51,000 | | | | 1.2 | % | | | 1,615 | | | | 31.67 | | | | 1.5 | % | | | 2,119 | | | | 41.56 | | | | 1.7 | % | | January 2016 |
20 | | Cell Genesys | | San Francisco | | | 101,872 | | | | 2.4 | % | | | 1,542 | | | | 15.13 | | | | 1.4 | % | | | 3,387 | | | | 33.25 | | | | 2.7 | % | | July 2017 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total / weighted average (5) | | | | | 2,842,360 | | | | 66.9 | % | | $ | 89,405 | | | $ | 31.45 | | | | 81.4 | % | | $ | 100,318 | | | $ | 35.29 | | | | 80.5 | % | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Based on current annualized base rent. Current annualized rent is the monthly contractual rent as of June 30, 2005, or if rent has not yet commenced, the first monthly rent payment due, multiplied by 12 months. |
|
(2) | | 41,532 square feet expires March 2009, 191,904 square feet expires August 2010, 59,322 square feet expires December 2010, and 290,714 square feet expires April 2018. 45,000 square feet of this space is subleased |
|
(3) | | 138,086 square feet expires December 2007 and 73,727 square feet expires December 2009. |
|
(4) | | This tenant occupies a property that is an unconsolidated partnership, of which we own 21%. |
|
(5) | | Without regard to any early lease terminations and/or renewal options. |
27
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
REDEVELOPMENT (1)
JUNE 30, 2005
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Square Feet | | | Estimated | |
| | | | Under | | | In-Service | |
Property | | Market | | Redevelopment (2) | | | Date (3) | |
Waples Street | | San Diego | | | 14,933 | | | | 2006 | |
Bridgeview | | San Francisco | | | 24,437 | | | | 2006 | |
Industrial Road | | San Francisco | | | 30,222 | | | | 2006 | |
Phoenixville Pike | | Pennsylvania | | | 52,630 | | | | 2006 | |
Graphics Drive | | New York / New Jersey | | | 61,616 | | | | 2006 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | | | 183,838 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Our redevelopment includes activities necessary for permanent change to office/laboratory space. |
|
(2) | | For our properties undergoing redevelopment, only the square footage undergoing redevelopment activities is removed from the portfolio statistics. |
|
(3) | | The property is expected to undergo a lease-up period once the redevelopment is complete. |
28
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
LAND DEVELOPMENT PARCELS (1)
JUNE 30, 2005
| | | | | | |
| | | | Developable | |
Property | | Market | | Square Feet | |
| | | | | | |
Towne Centre Drive | | San Diego | | | 84,000 | |
Landmark at Eastview | | New York / New Jersey | | | 464,000 | |
Fresh Pond Research Park | | Boston | | | 50,000 | |
| | | | | |
Total | | | | | 598,000 | |
| | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | These sites represent possible future developments, which are in proximity to the properties noted above. These developments will be impacted by the timing and likelihood of success of the entitlement process, both of which are uncertain. |
29
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
2005 ACQUISITIONS
JUNE 30, 2005
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Rentable | | | | | | | Percent | |
| | | | Closing | | Square | | | | | | | Leased | |
Property | | Market | | Date | | Feet | | | Investment | | | at Acquisition | |
| | | | | | | | | | (in thousands) | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
First Quarter 2005 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Waples Street | | San Diego | | March 1, 2005 | | | 43,036 | | | $ | 5,324 | | | | — | (1) |
Bridgeview | | San Francisco | | March 16, 2005 | | | 50,400 | | | | 16,219 | | | | 100.0 | % |
Graphics Drive | | New York / New Jersey | | March 17, 2005 | | | 72,300 | | | | 7,787 | | | | 14.8 | %(2) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
First Quarter Total | | | | | | | 165,736 | | | $ | 29,330 | | | | 30.4 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Second Quarter 2005 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fresh Pond Research Park | | Boston | | April 5, 2005 | | | 90,702 | | | $ | 20,768 | | | | 83.3 | % |
Coolidge Avenue | | Boston | | April 5, 2005 | | | 37,400 | | | | 10,837 | | | | 100.0 | % |
Phoenixville Pike | | Pennsylvania | | April 5, 2005 | | | 104,400 | | | | 13,240 | | | | 49.6 | % |
Nancy Ridge Drive | | San Diego | | April 21, 2005 | | | 42,138 | | | | 12,974 | | | | 100.0 | % |
Dumbarton Circle | | San Francisco | | May 27, 2005 | | | 44,000 | | | | 8,959 | | | | 100.0 | % |
Lucent Drive | | Boston | | May 31, 2005 | | | 21,500 | | | | 7,142 | | | | 100.0 | % |
21 Erie Street | | Boston | | May 31, 2005 | | | 48,238 | | | | 11,939 | | | | 58.1 | % |
Vassar Street | | Boston | | May 31, 2005 | | | 52,520 | | | | 17,850 | | | | 100.0 | % |
Albany Street | | Boston | | May 31, 2005 | | | 75,003 | | | | 38,444 | | | | 99.8 | % |
40 Erie Street | | Boston | | May 31, 2005 | | | 100,854 | | | | 45,755 | | | | 100.0 | % |
Sidney Street | | Boston | | May 31, 2005 | | | 191,904 | | | | 51,015 | | | | 100.0 | % |
Kendall Square A | | Boston | | May 31, 2005 | | | 302,919 | | | | 150,843 | | | | 96.7 | % |
Kendall Square D | | Boston | | May 31, 2005 | | | 349,325 | | | | 192,583 | | | | 98.2 | % |
47 Erie Street Parking Structure | | Boston | | May 31, 2005 | | | n/a | | | | 10,180 | | | | n/a | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Second Quarter Total | | | | | | | 1,460,903 | | | $ | 592,529 | | | | 92.9 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2005 Total | | | | | | | 1,626,639 | | | $ | 621,859 | | | | 86.5 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | The entire property was undergoing redevelopment on the date of acquisition. 28,103 square feet was leased in the second quarter. |
|
(2) | | 61,616 sq. ft. is undergoing redevelopment. The remainder is fully occupied. |
30
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
JOINT VENTURES
JUNE 30, 2005
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Investment | | Effective | | Square | | | Percent | |
Property | | Date | | Ownership % (1) | | Feet | | | Leased | |
Wholly-owned | | | | 100.0% | | | 3,712,981 | | | | 91.6 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consolidated Joint Ventures | | | | | | | | | | | | |
King of Prussia — Pennsylvania | | Aug. 11, 2004 | | 89.0% | | | 427,109 | | | | 100.0 | % |
Waples — San Diego | | March 1, 2005 | | 90.0% | | | 43,036 | | | | 65.3 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unconsolidated Joint Venture | | | | | | | | | | | | |
McKellar Court — San Diego | | Sept. 30, 2004 | | 21.0% | | | 72,863 | | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total Square Feet | | | | | | | 4,255,989 | | | | 92.3 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | The amounts shown above approximate our economic ownership interest for the period presented. Cash flow from operations, capital transactions, and net income/loss are allocated to the joint venture partners in accordance with their respective partnership agreements. Our share of these items is subject to change based on the operations of the property and the timing and amount of capital transactions. |
UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURE
(In thousands)
| | | | |
McKellar Court | | | | |
Miscellaneous Balance Sheet Information as of June 30, 2005: | | | | |
Rental property | | $ | 16,018 | |
Other assets | | | 1,634 | |
| | | |
Total assets | | $ | 17,652 | |
| | | |
Secured notes payable (1) | | $ | 11,173 | |
Other liabilities | | | 394 | |
Equity | | | 6,085 | |
| | | |
Total liabilities and partners’ equity | | $ | 17,652 | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Results of Operations for the three months ended June 30, 2005: | | | | |
Total revenues | | $ | 477 | |
Expenses: | | | | |
Rental operations | | | 48 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 95 | |
| | | |
Income from operations | | | 334 | |
Interest income | | | 2 | |
Interest expense | | | (237 | ) |
| | | |
Net income | | $ | 99 | |
| | | |
BioMed Realty Trust’s share | | | | |
Secured notes payable | | $ | 2,266 | |
Net income | | $ | 21 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 20 | |
| | | |
Funds from operations | | $ | 41 | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Supplemental information | | | | |
Distributions | | $ | 35 | |
Interest expense | | $ | 50 | |
| | |
(1) | | Includes debt premium of $385. |
31
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
LEASING ACTIVITY
JUNE 30, 2005
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Rentable | |
Tenant | | Property | | Market | | Description | | Square Feet | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
First Quarter Leasing Events | | | | | | | | | | |
Nuvelo, Inc. | | Industrial Road | | San Francisco | | New 7-year lease | | | 60,000 | |
Financial Planning | | Landmark at Eastview | | New York / New Jersey | | 5-year lease extension | | | 2,600 | |
ACS | | Landmark at Eastview | | New York / New Jersey | | 5-year lease extension | | | 71,399 | |
Smartmail | | Bridgeview | | San Francisco | | MTM lease extension | | | 25,718 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
First Quarter Total | | | | | | | | | 159,717 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Second Quarter Leasing Events | | | | | | | | | | |
Centocor, Inc. | | King of Prussia | | Pennsylvania | | New 5-year lease for additional space for existing tenant. | | | 79,667 | |
Amira Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | | Waples Street | | San Diego | | New 5-year lease | | | 28,103 | |
Tera Biotechnology | | Bunker Hill | | San Diego | | 1-year lease extension | | | 1,667 | |
Nuvelo, Inc. | | Industrial Road | | San Francisco | | New 7-year lease | | | 1,826 | |
Technovax, Inc. | | Landmark at Eastview | | New York / New Jersey | | New 3-year lease | | | 952 | |
Combe Incorporated | | Landmark at Eastview | | New York / New Jersey | | New 5-year lease for additional space for existing tenant. | | | 2,539 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Second Quarter Total | | | | | | | | | 114,754 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
32
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURE DEFINITIONS
JUNE 30, 2005
This document includes certain non-GAAP financial measures that management believes are helpful in understanding our business, as further described below. Our definition and calculation of non-GAAP financial measures may differ from those of other REITs, and may, therefore, not be comparable. The non-GAAP measures should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indicator of our performance and should be considered only a supplement to cash flows from operating, investing or financing activities as a measure of liquidity, computed in accordance with GAAP.
Funds from Operations (FFO)
We present funds from operations, or FFO, because we consider it an important supplemental measure of our operating performance and believe it is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of REITs, many of which present FFO when reporting their results. FFO is intended to exclude GAAP historical cost depreciation and amortization of real estate and related assets, which assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes ratably over time. Historically, however, real estate values have risen or fallen with market conditions. Because FFO excludes depreciation and amortization unique to real estate, gains and losses from property dispositions and extraordinary items, it provides a performance measure that, when compared year over year, reflects the impact to operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, development activities and interest costs, providing perspective not immediately apparent from net income. We compute FFO in accordance with standards established by the Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, in its March 1995 White Paper (as amended in November 1999 and April 2002). As defined by NAREIT, FFO represents net income (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of property, plus real estate related depreciation and amortization (excluding amortization of loan origination costs) and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Our computation may differ from the methodology for calculating FFO utilized by other equity REITs and, accordingly, may not be comparable to such other REITs. Further, FFO does not represent amounts available for management’s discretionary use because of needed capital replacement or expansion, debt service obligations, or other commitments and uncertainties. FFO should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) (computed in accordance with GAAP) as an indicator of our financial performance or to cash flow from operating activities (computed in accordance with GAAP) as an indicator of our liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to pay dividends or make distributions.
Adjusted Funds from Operations (AFFO)
We present adjusted funds from operations, or AFFO, as a supplemental operating measure because, when compared year over year, it assesses our ability to fund dividend and distribution requirements from our operating activities. We also believe that, as a widely recognized measure of the operations of REITs, AFFO will be used by investors as a basis to assess our ability to fund dividend payments in comparison to other REITs. We calculate AFFO by adding to FFO (a) amounts received pursuant to master lease agreements on certain properties, which are not included in rental income for GAAP purposes, and (b) non-cash operating revenues and expenses. Other equity REITs may not calculate AFFO in a consistent manner. Accordingly, our AFFO may not be comparable to other equity REITs’ AFFO. AFFO should be considered only as a supplement to net income computed in accordance with GAAP as a measure of our operations.
Earnings before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA)
EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. Management uses EBITDA as an indicator of our ability to incur and service debt. In addition, we consider EBITDA to be an appropriate supplemental measure of our performance because it eliminates depreciation and interest, which permits investors to view income from operations without the impact of non-cash depreciation or the cost of debt. However, because EBITDA is calculated before recurring cash charges including interest expense and taxes, and is not adjusted for capital expenditures or other recurring cash requirements of our business, its utility is limited.
Coverage Ratios
We present interest and fixed charge ratios as supplemental liquidity measures. Management uses these ratios as indicators of our financial flexibility to service current interest expense and debt amortization from current cash net operating income. In addition, we believe that these coverage ratios represent common metrics used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties to evaluate our ability to service fixed cash payments. However, because these ratios are derived from EBITDA, their utility is limited by the same factors that limit the usefulness of EBITDA as a liquidity measure.
Net Operating Income (NOI)
We use net operating income, or NOI, as a performance measure and believe NOI provides useful information to investors regarding our financial condition and results of operations because it reflects only those income and expense items that are incurred at the property level. We compute NOI by adding or subtracting certain items from net income, minority interest in the operating partnership, gains/losses from investment in unconsolidated partnership, interest expense, interest income, depreciation and amortization, and general and administrative expenses. NOI presented by us may not be comparable to NOI reported by other REITs that define NOI differently. NOI should not be considered as an alternative to net income as an indication of our performance or to cash flows as a measure of liquidity or ability to make distributions.
33