Exhibit 99.2
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.
SUPPLEMENTAL OPERATING AND FINANCIAL DATA
June 30, 2006
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | Shady Grove Road Human Genome Sciences, Inc. Rockville, MD Acquired May 2006
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | Belward Campus Drive Human Genome Sciences, Inc. Rockville, MD Acquired May 2006
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. | | www.biomedrealty.com |
| 17140 Bernardo Center Drive, Suite 222 | | 858.485.9840 | | |
| San Diego, CA 92128 | | 858.485.9843 (fax) |
| | | | | | | |
| Investor Relations Contact | | | | |
| Kent Griffin | | | | |
| Chief Financial Officer | | | | |
| 858.485.9840 | | | | | | |
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
JUNE 30, 2006
| | | | |
| | Page | |
Company Background | | | 3 | |
Investor Information | | | 4 | |
Financial and Operating Highlights | | | 5 | |
Consolidated Balance Sheets | | | 6 | |
Consolidated Statements of Income | | | 7 | |
Funds From Operations and Adjusted Funds From Operations | | | 8 | |
Reconciliation of EBITDA and AFFO | | | 9 | |
Reconciliation of Net Operating Income | | | 10 | |
Coverage Ratios | | | 11 | |
Debt Summary | | | 12 | |
Debt Maturities and Principal Payments | | | 13 | |
Common Stock Data | | | 14 | |
Same Property Analysis | | | 15 | |
Portfolio Summary and Lease Expirations | | | 16 | |
Occupancy Summary | | | 17 | |
Property Listing | | | 18 | |
10 Largest Tenants | | | 19 | |
Redevelopment and Land Development Parcels | | | 20 | |
Acquisitions | | | 21 | |
Leasing Activity | | | 22 | |
Tenant Improvements and Leasing Commissions | | | 23 | |
Non-GAAP Financial Measure Definitions | | | 24 | |
This Supplemental Operating and Financial Data package contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Although we believe the expectations reflected in any forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, you should exercise caution in interpreting and relying on these statements as they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which are, in some cases, beyond the company’s control and could materially affect actual results, performance or achievements. These factors include, without limitation, the ability to enter into new leases or renew leases on favorable terms, dependence on tenants’ financial condition, competition from other developers, owners and operators of real estate, adverse economic or real estate developments in the life science industry or the company’s target markets, the uncertainty of real estate development and acquisition activity, the ability to complete or integrate acquisitions successfully, the availability and terms of financing and the use of debt to fund acquisitions and developments, the effect of local economic and market conditions, regulatory and tax law changes and other risks and uncertainties detailed from time to time in the company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the company’s most recent annual report on Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. The company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
All dollar amounts shown in this report are unaudited.
This Supplemental Operating and Financial Data package is not an offer to sell or solicitation to buy securities of BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. Any offers to sell or solicitations to buy securities of BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. shall be made only by means of a prospectus approved for that purpose.
2
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
COMPANY BACKGROUND
JUNE 30, 2006
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. operates as a fully integrated, self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust (REIT) focused on acquiring, developing, owning, leasing and managing laboratory and office space for the life science industry. Our tenants primarily include biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, scientific research institutions, government agencies and other entities involved in the life science industry. Our properties and primary acquisition targets are generally located in markets with well established reputations as centers for scientific research, including Boston, San Diego, San Francisco, Seattle, Maryland, Pennsylvania and New York/New Jersey.
On April 7, 2006, we completed the acquisition of a 47,912 square foot office and laboratory facility located at 58 Charles Street in Cambridge, Massachusetts for approximately $13.2 million.
On May 24, 2006, we completed the acquisition of Human Genome Sciences, Inc.’s 289,912 square foot large-scale manufacturing facility and its 635,058 square foot headquarters office and laboratory facility located in Rockville, Maryland for approximately $425.0 million. The facilities are fully leased to Human Genome Sciences pursuant to 20-year triple-net leases.
In connection with the acquisition of the Human Genome Sciences portfolio, we entered into a $150 million secured bridge loan with KeyBank National Association. The bridge loan had an initial term of three months, which was extended for an additional three months.
On May 31, 2006, we completed the acquisition of One Research Way in Princeton, New Jersey. The 49,421 square foot property was acquired for approximately $8.0 million.
On June 7, 2006, we completed a follow-on common stock offering of 10,436,250 shares at $28.65 per share, resulting in net proceeds of $286.5 million.
On June 14, 2006, we acquired an 87.5% joint venture interest in a property located at 34175 Ardenwood Boulevard in Fremont, California. The property, consisting of 72,500 square feet of office and laboratory space, was acquired for approximately $14.5 million.
On June 28, 2006, we amended and restated our unsecured revolving credit facility, doubling the size of the facility from $250 million to $500 million. In addition to increasing the size of the facility, the amendment extends the term to June 27, 2009, provides greater flexibility with respect to covenants, and reduces the borrowing rate. We may extend the maturity date of the revolving credit facility to June 27, 2010 and may increase the amount of the facility to $700 million upon satisfying certain conditions.
As of June 30, 2006, we owned or had interests in 47 properties, located principally in Boston, San Diego, San Francisco, Seattle, Maryland, Pennsylvania, New York and New Jersey, consisting of 71 buildings with approximately 5.9 million rentable square feet of laboratory and office space, which was approximately 91.4% leased to 94 tenants. Of the approximately 505,000 square feet of unleased space, approximately 344,000 square feet, or 68.2% of our unleased square footage, was under redevelopment. We also owned undeveloped land that we estimate can support up to 1,299,000 rentable square feet of laboratory and office space.
This Supplemental Operating and Financial Data package supplements the information provided in our quarterly and annual reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Additional information about us and our properties is also available at our website:www.biomedrealty.com
3
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
INVESTOR INFORMATION
JUNE 30, 2006
| | | | |
Board of Directors | | | | |
|
Alan D. Gold | | Edward A. Dennis, Ph.D. | | Theodore D. Roth |
Chairman | | | | |
| | | | |
Gary A. Kreitzer | | Mark J. Riedy, Ph.D. | | M. Faye Wilson |
| | | | |
Barbara R. Cambon | | | | |
| | | | |
Executive Officers | | | | |
|
Alan D. Gold | | John F. Wilson, II | | R. Kent Griffin, Jr. |
President and Chief Executive Officer | | Executive Vice President-Operations | | Chief Financial Officer |
| | | | |
Gary A. Kreitzer | | Matthew G. McDevitt | | |
Executive Vice President, | | Regional Executive Vice President | | |
General Counsel, and Secretary | | | | |
| | | | |
Equity Research Coverage | | | | |
|
Friedman Billings Ramsey | | Raymond James | | Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc. |
Paul Morgan / Ron She | | Paul D. Puryear / Ken Avalos | | Jerry L. Doctrow |
703.469.1255 / 703.312.9683 | | 800.248.8863 | | 800.368.2558 |
| | | | |
Wachovia Securities | | RBC Capital Markets | | |
Christopher Haley | | Sri Nagarajan | | |
443.263.6773 | | 212.428.2360 | | |
| | | | |
Company Information | | | | |
|
Corporate Headquarters | | Trading Symbol | | Transfer Agent |
17140 Bernardo Center Drive, Suite 222 | | BMR | | The Bank of New York |
San Diego, CA 92128 | | | | 101 Barclay Street, 11E |
858.485.9840 | | Stock Exchange Listing | | New York, NY 10286 |
858.485.9843 (fax) | | New York Stock Exchange | | 212.815.3782 |
| | | | |
Please visit our corporate website at: www.biomedrealty.com | | |
| | | | |
2006 Tentative Schedule for Quarterly Results | | | | |
|
Third Quarter | | Early November 2006 | | |
Fourth Quarter | | February 2007 | | |
4
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
FINANCIAL AND OPERATING HIGHLIGHTS
JUNE 30, 2006
(In thousands, except per share, ratio and portfolio amounts)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of or for the three months ended | |
| | 6/30/06 | | | 3/31/06 | | | 12/31/05 | | | 9/30/05 | | | 6/30/05 | |
Selected Operating Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | | $ | 49,459 | | | $ | 43,793 | | | $ | 44,492 | | | $ | 41,330 | | | $ | 28,563 | |
Straight line rent | | | 2,383 | | | | 1,741 | | | | 1,564 | | | | 1,546 | | | | 1,396 | |
Fair value lease revenue (1) | | | 574 | | | | 578 | | | | 728 | | | | 791 | | | | 330 | |
EBITDA (2) | | | 31,501 | | | | 25,861 | | | | 24,951 | | | | 25,085 | | | | 16,813 | |
General and administrative expense | | | 4,206 | | | | 4,347 | | | | 4,277 | | | | 3,756 | | | | 2,695 | |
Interest expense | | | 9,253 | | | | 7,784 | | | | 7,581 | | | | 7,422 | | | | 6,812 | |
Capitalized interest | | | (335 | ) | | | (236 | ) | | | (258 | ) | | | (275 | ) | | | (150 | ) |
Minority interests | | | (356 | ) | | | (222 | ) | | | (235 | ) | | | (278 | ) | | | (65 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating margins (3) | | | 71.2 | % | | | 68.5 | % | | | 64.4 | % | | | 67.3 | % | | | 67.8 | % |
Operating expense recoveries (3) | | | 90.2 | % | | | 91.5 | % | | | 90.7 | % | | | 91.7 | % | | | 93.0 | % |
Same property net operating income change (4) | | | 2.1 | % | | | 5.0 | % | | | 11.3 | % | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | | 7,158 | | | | 4,474 | | | | 4,569 | | | | 5,201 | | | | 1,440 | |
Net income per share — diluted | | $ | 0.14 | | | $ | 0.10 | | | $ | 0.10 | | | $ | 0.11 | | | $ | 0.05 | |
FFO (5) | | | 22,294 | | | | 18,131 | | | | 17,418 | | | | 17,708 | | | | 10,067 | |
FFO per share — diluted (5) | | $ | 0.41 | | | $ | 0.37 | | | $ | 0.35 | | | $ | 0.36 | | | $ | 0.29 | |
AFFO (6) | | | 19,756 | | | | 16,158 | | | | 13,535 | | | | 16,469 | | | | 10,747 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selected Balance Sheet Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 23,093 | | | $ | 30,365 | | | $ | 20,312 | | | $ | 74,495 | | | $ | 113,014 | |
Investments in real estate, net | | | 1,589,788 | | | | 1,131,917 | | | | 1,129,371 | | | | 1,072,427 | | | | 1,033,743 | |
Total assets | | | 1,806,952 | | | | 1,346,897 | | | | 1,337,310 | | | | 1,330,481 | | | | 1,327,145 | |
Total liabilities | | | 781,033 | | | | 601,030 | | | | 586,162 | | | | 573,649 | | | | 569,371 | |
Minority interests | | | 19,907 | | | | 20,367 | | | | 20,673 | | | | 21,278 | | | | 21,775 | |
Total stockholders’ equity | | | 1,006,012 | | | | 725,500 | | | | 730,475 | | | | 735,554 | | | | 735,999 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capitalization | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total common shares outstanding | | | 57,229 | | | | 46,782 | | | | 46,634 | | | | 46,636 | | | | 46,567 | |
Total units outstanding | | | 2,864 | | | | 2,864 | | | | 2,864 | | | | 2,870 | | | | 2,870 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total common shares and units outstanding | | | 60,093 | | | | 49,646 | | | | 49,498 | | | | 49,506 | | | | 49,437 | |
Share price at quarter end | | $ | 29.94 | | | $ | 29.64 | | | $ | 24.40 | | | $ | 24.80 | | | $ | 23.85 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity value at quarter end (7) | | | 1,799,184 | | | | 1,471,507 | | | | 1,207,751 | | | | 1,227,749 | | | | 1,179,072 | |
Consolidated debt | | $ | 705,202 | | | $ | 527,077 | | | $ | 513,233 | | | $ | 498,004 | | | $ | 499,818 | |
Total market capitalization | | | 2,504,386 | | | | 1,998,584 | | | | 1,720,984 | | | | 1,725,753 | | | | 1,678,890 | |
Debt / total market capitalization | | | 28.2 | % | | | 26.4 | % | | | 29.8 | % | | | 28.9 | % | | | 29.8 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Financial Ratios | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest coverage (8) | | | 3.4 | | | | 3.3 | | | | 3.3 | | | | 3.4 | | | | 2.5 | |
Fixed charge coverage (8) | | | 3.0 | | | | 2.8 | | | | 2.8 | | | | 2.9 | | | | 2.2 | |
FFO payout | | | 70.7 | % | | | 78.4 | % | | | 77.1 | % | | | 75.0 | % | | | 93.1 | % |
AFFO payout | | | 80.6 | % | | | 87.9 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 81.8 | % | | | 87.1 | % |
Debt / total assets | | | 39.0 | % | | | 39.1 | % | | | 38.4 | % | | | 37.4 | % | | | 37.7 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Portfolio Statistics | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Properties owned at end of quarter | | | 47 | | | | 42 | | | | 40 | | | | 37 | | | | 34 | |
Total rentable square footage owned | | | 5,861,411 | | | | 4,766,608 | | | | 4,755,315 | | | | 4,431,001 | | | | 4,255,989 | |
Leased at end of quarter | | | 91.4 | % | | | 89.2 | % | | | 91.1 | % | | | 90.6 | % | | | 92.3 | % |
Redevelopment at end of quarter | | | 5.9 | % | | | 7.5 | % | | | 5.8 | % | | | 6.1 | % | | | 4.3 | % |
Vacancy at end of quarter | | | 2.7 | % | | | 3.3 | % | | | 3.1 | % | | | 3.3 | % | | | 3.4 | % |
| | |
(1) | | Represents the net adjustment for above and below market leases which are being amortized over the remaining term of the respective leases from the date of acquisition. |
|
(2) | | For a definition and discussion of EBITDA, see page 24. For a quantitative reconciliation of the differences between EBITDA and net income, see page 9. |
|
(3) | | See page 10 for detail. |
|
(4) | | See page 15 for detail. |
|
(5) | | For a definition and discussion of FFO, see page 24. For a quantitative reconciliation of the differences between FFO and net income, see page 8. |
|
(6) | | For a definition and discussion of AFFO, see page 24. For a quantitative reconciliation of the differences between AFFO and net income, see page 8. For a qualitative reconciliation of the differences between AFFO and cash flow from operating activities, see page 9. |
|
(7) | | Assuming conversion of 100% of the operating partnership units into shares of common stock. |
|
(8) | | For a discussion of coverage ratios, see page 24. See page 11 for detail. |
5
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
JUNE 30, 2006
(In thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 6/30/06 | | | 3/31/06 | | | 12/31/05 | | | 9/30/05 | | | 6/30/05 | |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments in real estate, net | | $ | 1,589,788 | | | $ | 1,131,917 | | | $ | 1,129,371 | | | $ | 1,072,427 | | | $ | 1,033,743 | |
Investment in unconsolidated partnership | | | 2,454 | | | | 2,476 | | | | 2,483 | | | | 2,492 | | | | 2,490 | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | 23,093 | | | | 30,365 | | | | 20,312 | | | | 74,495 | | | | 113,014 | |
Restricted cash | | | 5,249 | | | | 5,844 | | | | 5,487 | | | | 5,866 | | | | 4,592 | |
Accounts receivable, net | | | 2,981 | | | | 5,625 | | | | 9,873 | | | | 5,819 | | | | 5,690 | |
Accrued straight-line rents, net | | | 12,855 | | | | 10,472 | | | | 8,731 | | | | 7,166 | | | | 5,620 | |
Acquired above market leases, net | | | 8,625 | | | | 8,925 | | | | 8,817 | | | | 7,437 | | | | 7,813 | |
Deferred leasing costs, net | | | 126,549 | | | | 130,593 | | | | 136,640 | | | | 138,008 | | | | 143,609 | |
Deferred loan costs, net | | | 6,282 | | | | 4,507 | | | | 4,855 | | | | 5,196 | | | | 5,530 | |
Prepaid expenses | | | 2,362 | | | | 2,840 | | | | 2,164 | | | | 5,216 | | | | 2,627 | |
Other assets | | | 26,714 | | | | 13,333 | | | | 8,577 | | | | 6,359 | | | | 2,417 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 1,806,952 | | | $ | 1,346,897 | | | $ | 1,337,310 | | | $ | 1,330,481 | | | $ | 1,327,145 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage notes payable, net | | $ | 244,402 | | | $ | 246,377 | | | $ | 246,233 | | | $ | 248,004 | | | $ | 249,818 | |
Secured term loan | | | 250,000 | | | | 250,000 | | | | 250,000 | | | | 250,000 | | | | 250,000 | |
Secured bridge loan | | | 150,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Unsecured line of credit | | | 60,800 | | | | 30,700 | | | | 17,000 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Security deposits | | | 7,264 | | | | 6,883 | | | | 6,905 | | | | 6,222 | | | | 5,976 | |
Dividends and distributions payable | | | 17,427 | | | | 14,397 | | | | 13,365 | | | | 13,367 | | | | 9,265 | |
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities | | | 23,611 | | | | 24,196 | | | | 23,012 | | | | 25,234 | | | | 22,324 | |
Acquired below market leases, net | | | 27,529 | | | | 28,477 | | | | 29,647 | | | | 30,822 | | | | 31,988 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 781,033 | | | | 601,030 | | | | 586,162 | | | | 573,649 | | | | 569,371 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Minority interests | | | 19,907 | | | | 20,367 | | | | 20,673 | | | | 21,278 | | | | 21,775 | |
Stockholders’ equity: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Common stock | | | 571 | | | | 466 | | | | 466 | | | | 466 | | | | 465 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 1,045,831 | | | | 758,375 | | | | 757,591 | | | | 756,768 | | | | 755,390 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive income | | | 11,646 | | | | 9,256 | | | | 5,922 | | | | 3,802 | | | | (1,765 | ) |
Dividends in excess of earnings | | | (52,036 | ) | | | (42,597 | ) | | | (33,504 | ) | | | (25,482 | ) | | | (18,091 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total stockholders’ equity | | | 1,006,012 | | | | 725,500 | | | | 730,475 | | | | 735,554 | | | | 735,999 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | $ | 1,806,952 | | | $ | 1,346,897 | | | $ | 1,337,310 | | | $ | 1,330,481 | | | $ | 1,327,145 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
6
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
JUNE 30, 2006
(In thousands, except share data)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | |
| | 6/30/06 | | | 3/31/06 | | | 12/31/05 | | | 9/30/05 | | | 6/30/05 | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rental | | $ | 36,556 | | | $ | 31,178 | | | $ | 29,756 | | | $ | 28,593 | | | $ | 20,014 | |
Tenant recoveries | | | 12,839 | | | | 12,609 | | | | 14,198 | | | | 12,225 | | | | 8,549 | |
Other income | | | 64 | | | | 6 | | | | 538 | | | | 512 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | | | 49,459 | | | | 43,793 | | | | 44,492 | | | | 41,330 | | | | 28,563 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rental operations | | | 9,642 | | | | 9,543 | | | | 11,626 | | | | 9,763 | | | | 6,721 | |
Real estate taxes | | | 4,587 | | | | 4,242 | | | | 4,031 | | | | 3,573 | | | | 2,476 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 14,714 | | | | 13,361 | | | | 12,546 | | | | 12,164 | | | | 8,476 | |
General and administrative | | | 4,206 | | | | 4,347 | | | | 4,277 | | | | 3,756 | | | | 2,695 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total expenses | | | 33,149 | | | | 31,493 | | | | 32,480 | | | | 29,256 | | | | 20,368 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from operations | | | 16,310 | | | | 12,300 | | | | 12,012 | | | | 12,074 | | | | 8,195 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity in net income of unconsolidated partnership | | | 22 | | | | 20 | | | | 28 | | | | 20 | | | | 20 | |
Interest income | | | 435 | | | | 160 | | | | 345 | | | | 807 | | | | 102 | |
Interest expense | | | (9,253 | ) | | | (7,784 | ) | | | (7,581 | ) | | | (7,422 | ) | | | (6,812 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income before minority interests | | | 7,514 | | | | 4,696 | | | | 4,804 | | | | 5,479 | | | | 1,505 | |
Minority interests in consolidated partnerships | | | 46 | | | | 54 | | | | 48 | | | | 45 | | | | 66 | |
Minority interests in operating partnership | | | (402 | ) | | | (276 | ) | | | (283 | ) | | | (323 | ) | | | (131 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 7,158 | | | $ | 4,474 | | | $ | 4,569 | | | $ | 5,201 | | | $ | 1,440 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic earnings per share | | $ | 0.14 | | | $ | 0.10 | | | $ | 0.10 | | | $ | 0.11 | | | $ | 0.05 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted earnings per share | | $ | 0.14 | | | $ | 0.10 | | | $ | 0.10 | | | $ | 0.11 | | | $ | 0.05 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted-average common shares outstanding: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | 51,394,117 | | | | 46,369,605 | | | | 46,290,279 | | | | 46,287,617 | | | | 31,861,536 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted | | | 54,534,393 | | | | 49,518,010 | | | | 49,482,818 | | | | 49,444,409 | | | | 34,893,367 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
7
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS (1) AND
ADJUSTED FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS (2)
JUNE 30, 2006
(In thousands, except per share and ratio amounts)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | |
| | 6/30/06 | | | 3/31/06 | | | 12/31/05 | | | 9/30/05 | | | 6/30/05 | |
Reconciliation of net income to funds from operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 7,158 | | | $ | 4,474 | | | $ | 4,569 | | | $ | 5,201 | | | $ | 1,440 | |
Adjustments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Minority interests in operating partnership | | | 402 | | | | 276 | | | | 283 | | | | 323 | | | | 131 | |
Depreciation and amortization (3) | | | 14,734 | | | | 13,381 | | | | 12,566 | | | | 12,184 | | | | 8,496 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Funds from operations (FFO) | | $ | 22,294 | | | $ | 18,131 | | | $ | 17,418 | | | $ | 17,708 | | | $ | 10,067 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
FFO per share — diluted | | $ | 0.41 | | | $ | 0.37 | | | $ | 0.35 | | | $ | 0.36 | | | $ | 0.29 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends and distributions declared per share | | $ | 0.29 | | | $ | 0.29 | | | $ | 0.27 | | | $ | 0.27 | | | $ | 0.27 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
FFO payout ratio (4) | | | 70.7 | % | | | 78.4 | % | | | 77.1 | % | | | 75.0 | % | | | 93.1 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reconciliation of funds from operations to adjusted funds from operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Funds from operations | | $ | 22,294 | | | $ | 18,131 | | | $ | 17,418 | | | $ | 17,708 | | | $ | 10,067 | |
Adjustments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Master lease receipts (5) | | | 155 | | | | 300 | | | | 361 | | | | 361 | | | | 517 | |
Second generation capital expenditures | | | (527 | ) | | | (472 | ) | | | (2,623 | ) | | | (451 | ) | | | (750 | ) |
Amortization of deferred loan costs | | | 379 | | | | 339 | | | | 328 | | | | 342 | | | | 2,204 | |
Amortization of fair value of debt acquired | | | (615 | ) | | | (605 | ) | | | (480 | ) | | | (630 | ) | | | (390 | ) |
Non-cash stock compensation | | | 1,027 | | | | 784 | | | | 823 | | | | 1,476 | | | | 825 | |
Straight line rents | | | (2,383 | ) | | | (1,741 | ) | | | (1,564 | ) | | | (1,546 | ) | | | (1,396 | ) |
Fair value lease revenue | | | (574 | ) | | | (578 | ) | | | (728 | ) | | | (791 | ) | | | (330 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Adjusted funds from operations (AFFO) | | $ | 19,756 | | | $ | 16,158 | | | $ | 13,535 | | | $ | 16,469 | | | $ | 10,747 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends and distributions declared | | $ | 0.29 | | | $ | 0.29 | | | $ | 0.27 | | | $ | 0.27 | | | $ | 0.27 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
AFFO payout ratio (6) | | | 80.6 | % | | | 87.9 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 81.8 | % | | | 87.1 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | For a definition and discussion of FFO, see page 24. |
|
(2) | | For a definition and discussion of AFFO, see page 24. For a qualitative reconciliation of the differences between AFFO and cash flow from operating activities, see page 9. |
|
(3) | | Includes the company’s share of depreciation and amortization from our unconsolidated partnership of $20. |
|
(4) | | Calculated as dividends and distributions declared per share divided by FFO per share — diluted. |
|
(5) | | Revenues earned and received per the terms of master lease agreements that for GAAP purposes are not included in rental revenues, but as a reduction to assets. |
|
(6) | | Calculated as dividends and distributions declared per share divided by AFFO per share — diluted. |
8
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
RECONCILIATION OF EARNINGS BEFORE
INTEREST, TAXES, DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION(1)
AND ADJUSTED FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS(2)
JUNE 30, 2006
(In thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | |
| | 6/30/06 | | | 3/31/06 | | | 12/31/05 | | | 9/30/05 | | | 6/30/05 | |
Reconciliation of net income to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA): | |
Net income | | $ | 7,158 | | | $ | 4,474 | | | $ | 4,569 | | | $ | 5,201 | | | $ | 1,440 | |
Minority interests | | | 356 | | | | 222 | | | | 235 | | | | 278 | | | | 65 | |
Interest expense | | | 9,253 | | | | 7,784 | | | | 7,581 | | | | 7,422 | | | | 6,812 | |
Depreciation and amortization (3) | | | 14,734 | | | | 13,381 | | | | 12,566 | | | | 12,184 | | | | 8,496 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EBITDA | | $ | 31,501 | | | $ | 25,861 | | | $ | 24,951 | | | $ | 25,085 | | | $ | 16,813 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reconciliation of cash flows provided by operating activities to adjusted funds from operations (AFFO): | | |
Cash flows from operating activities | | $ | 44,747 | | | $ | 21,194 | | | $ | (10,417 | ) | | $ | 39,419 | | | $ | 23,038 | |
Changes in other assets and liabilities | | | (25,146 | ) | | | (5,336 | ) | | | 23,591 | | | | (23,311 | ) | | | (12,808 | ) |
Master lease receipts | | | 155 | | | | 300 | | | | 361 | | | | 361 | | | | 517 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
AFFO | | $ | 19,756 | | | $ | 16,158 | | | $ | 13,535 | | | $ | 16,469 | | | $ | 10,747 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | For a definition and discussion of EBITDA, see page 24. |
|
(2) | | For a definition and discussion of AFFO, see page 24. |
|
(3) | | Includes the company’s share of depreciation and amortization from our unconsolidated partnership of $20. |
9
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
RECONCILIATION OF NET OPERATING INCOME (1)
JUNE 30, 2006
(Dollars in thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | |
| | 6/30/06 | | | 3/31/06 | | | 12/31/05 | | | 9/30/05 | | | 6/30/05 | |
Net income | | $ | 7,158 | | | $ | 4,474 | | | $ | 4,569 | | | $ | 5,201 | | | $ | 1,440 | |
Minority interests | | | 356 | | | | 222 | | | | 235 | | | | 278 | | | | 65 | |
Net income of unconsolidated partnership | | | (22 | ) | | | (20 | ) | | | (28 | ) | | | (20 | ) | | | (20 | ) |
Interest expense | | | 9,253 | | | | 7,784 | | | | 7,581 | | | | 7,422 | | | | 6,812 | |
Interest income | | | (435 | ) | | | (160 | ) | | | (345 | ) | | | (807 | ) | | | (102 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from operations | | | 16,310 | | | | 12,300 | | | | 12,012 | | | | 12,074 | | | | 8,195 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 14,714 | | | | 13,361 | | | | 12,546 | | | | 12,164 | | | | 8,476 | |
General and administrative | | | 4,206 | | | | 4,347 | | | | 4,277 | | | | 3,756 | | | | 2,695 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consolidated net operating income | | $ | 35,230 | | | $ | 30,008 | | | $ | 28,835 | | | $ | 27,994 | | | $ | 19,366 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rental | | $ | 36,556 | | | $ | 31,178 | | | $ | 29,756 | | | $ | 28,593 | | | $ | 20,014 | |
Tenant recoveries | | | 12,839 | | | | 12,609 | | | | 14,198 | | | | 12,225 | | | | 8,549 | |
Other income | | | 64 | | | | 6 | | | | 538 | | | | 512 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | | | 49,459 | | | | 43,793 | | | | 44,492 | | | | 41,330 | | | | 28,563 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rental operations | | | 9,642 | | | | 9,543 | | | | 11,626 | | | | 9,763 | | | | 6,721 | |
Real estate taxes | | | 4,587 | | | | 4,242 | | | | 4,031 | | | | 3,573 | | | | 2,476 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total operating expenses | | | 14,229 | | | | 13,785 | | | | 15,657 | | | | 13,336 | | | | 9,197 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consolidated net operating income | | $ | 35,230 | | | $ | 30,008 | | | $ | 28,835 | | | $ | 27,994 | | | $ | 19,366 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating margin (2) | | | 71.2 | % | | | 68.5 | % | | | 64.4 | % | | | 67.3 | % | | | 67.8 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating expense recovery (3) | | | 90.2 | % | | | 91.5 | % | | | 90.7 | % | | | 91.7 | % | | | 93.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | For a definition and discussion of net operating income, see page 24. |
|
(2) | | Operating margin is calculated as ((rental revenue + tenant recovery revenue — rental operations — real estate taxes) / (rental revenue + tenant recovery revenue)). |
|
(3) | | Operating expense recovery is calculated as (tenant recovery revenue / (rental operations + real estate taxes)). |
10
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
COVERAGE RATIOS (1)
JUNE 30, 2006
(In thousands, except ratios)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | |
| | 6/30/06 | | | 3/31/06 | | | 12/31/05 | | | 9/30/05 | | | 6/30/05 | |
Interest coverage ratio: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EBITDA | | $ | 31,501 | | | $ | 25,861 | | | $ | 24,951 | | | $ | 25,085 | | | $ | 16,813 | |
Interest expense: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense(2) | | | 9,253 | | | | 7,784 | | | | 7,581 | | | | 7,422 | | | | 6,812 | |
Interest expense — unconsolidated partnership | | | 50 | | | | 49 | | | | 50 | | | | 50 | | | | 50 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total interest expense | | | 9,303 | | | | 7,833 | | | | 7,631 | | | | 7,472 | | | | 6,862 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest coverage ratio | | | 3.4 | | | | 3.3 | | | | 3.3 | | | | 3.4 | | | | 2.5 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fixed charge coverage ratio: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EBITDA | | $ | 31,501 | | | $ | 25,861 | | | $ | 24,951 | | | $ | 25,085 | | | $ | 16,813 | |
Fixed charges: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense(2) | | | 9,253 | | | | 7,784 | | | | 7,581 | | | | 7,422 | | | | 6,812 | |
Interest expense — unconsolidated partnership | | | 50 | | | | 49 | | | | 50 | | | | 50 | | | | 50 | |
Principal payments | | | 1,359 | | | | 1,253 | | | | 1,291 | | | | 1,266 | | | | 821 | |
Principal payments — unconsolidated partnership | | | 6 | | | | 7 | | | | 6 | | | | 6 | | | | 4 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total fixed charges | | | 10,668 | | | | 9,093 | | | | 8,928 | | | | 8,744 | | | | 7,687 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fixed charge coverage ratio | | | 3.0 | | | | 2.8 | | | | 2.8 | | | | 2.9 | | | | 2.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | For a discussion of coverage ratios, see page 24. |
|
(2) | | The three months ended June 30, 2005 includes $2.0 million of loan fee amortization expense related to the repayment and termination of our $100.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility and our $100.0 million unsecured term loan facility. |
11
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
DEBT SUMMARY
JUNE 30, 2006
(Dollars in thousands)
Weighted average maturity is 4.0 years.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Stated | | | Effective | | | Principal | | | Unamortized | | | Carrying | | | Maturity | |
| | Rate | | | Rate (1) | | | Balance | | | Premium(2) | | | Value | | | Date | |
Consolidated debt: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage notes payable (3) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ardentech Court | | | 7.25 | % | | | 5.06 | % | | $ | 4,703 | | | $ | 504 | | | $ | 5,207 | | | | 07/12 | |
Bayshore Boulevard | | | 4.55 | % | | | 4.55 | % | | | 15,920 | | | | — | | | | 15,920 | | | | 01/10 | |
Bridgeview Technology Park I | | | 8.07 | % | | | 5.04 | % | | | 11,678 | | | | 1,445 | | | | 13,123 | | | | 01/11 | |
Eisenhower Road | | | 5.80 | % | | | 4.63 | % | | | 2,183 | | | | 45 | | | | 2,228 | | | | 05/08 | |
Elliott Avenue | | | 7.38 | % | | | 4.63 | % | | | 16,277 | | | | 561 | | | | 16,838 | | | | 11/07 | |
40 Erie Street | | | 7.34 | % | | | 4.90 | % | | | 19,174 | | | | 876 | | | | 20,050 | | | | 08/08 | |
Kendall Square D | | | 6.38 | % | | | 5.45 | % | | | 71,690 | | | | 5,104 | | | | 76,794 | | | | 12/18 | |
Lucent Drive(4) | | | 5.50 | % | | | 5.50 | % | | | 5,825 | | | | — | | | | 5,825 | | | | 01/15 | |
Monte Villa Parkway | | | 4.55 | % | | | 4.55 | % | | | 9,692 | | | | — | | | | 9,692 | | | | 01/10 | |
Nancy Ridge Drive | | | 7.15 | % | | | 5.38 | % | | | 6,912 | | | | 660 | | | | 7,572 | | | | 09/12 | |
Science Center Drive | | | 7.65 | % | | | 5.04 | % | | | 11,510 | | | | 1,334 | | | | 12,844 | | | | 07/11 | |
Sidney Street | | | 7.23 | % | | | 5.11 | % | | | 31,086 | | | | 3,153 | | | | 34,239 | | | | 06/12 | |
Towne Centre Drive | | | 4.55 | % | | | 4.55 | % | | | 22,137 | | | | — | | | | 22,137 | | | | 01/10 | |
900 Uniqema Boulevard | | | 8.61 | % | | | 5.61 | % | | | 1,714 | | | | 219 | | | | 1,933 | | | | 05/15 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / weighted average on fixed rate notes | | | 6.44 | % | | | 5.06 | % | | $ | 230,501 | | | $ | 13,901 | | | $ | 244,402 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Variable rate debt (5) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$250 million secured term loan(6) | | | 6.41 | % | | | 6.41 | % | | | 250,000 | | | | — | | | | 250,000 | | | | 05/10 | |
$500 million unsecured line of credit(7) | | | 6.54 | % | | | 6.54 | % | | | 60,800 | | | | — | | | | 60,800 | | | | 06/09 | |
$150 million secured bridge loan(8) | | | 6.70 | % | | | 6.70 | % | | | 150,000 | | | | — | | | | 150,000 | | | | 08/06 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / weighted average consolidated debt | | | 6.50 | % | | | 6.03 | % | | $ | 691,301 | | | $ | 13,901 | | | $ | 705,202 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Pro rata share of unconsolidated partnership debt | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
McKellar Court (21%) | | | 8.56 | % | | | 4.63 | % | | | 2,242 | | | | — | | | | 2,242 | | | | 01/10 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / weighted average | | | 8.56 | % | | | 4.63 | % | | $ | 2,242 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,242 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / weighted average consolidated and pro rata share of unconsolidated partnership debt | | | 6.50 | % | | | 6.03 | % | | $ | 693,543 | | | $ | 13,901 | | | $ | 707,444 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Represents the company’s incremental borrowing rate on the date of acquisition of the property. |
|
(2) | | Represents the unamortized premium to record the debt at its fair value based on the company’s incremental borrowing rate on the date of acquisition. |
|
(3) | | Require monthly principal and interest payments. |
|
(4) | | The interest rate adjusts each fifth anniversary of the loan. The next adjustment date is January 2010. The interest rate adjustment is the five-year US Treasury plus 250 basis points. |
|
(5) | | Require monthly interest payments. |
|
(6) | | Interest on the $250 million secured term loan is LIBOR-indexed variable. We have entered into an interest rate swap agreement to fix the interest rate on the entire $250 million outstanding on this secured term loan at 6.41% through the maturity date. |
|
(7) | | Interest on the $500 million unsecured line of credit is a LIBOR-indexed variable plus credit spread, which ranges from 110 to 160 basis points depending on our leverage. |
|
(8) | | Interest on the $150 million secured bridge loan is a LIBOR-indexed variable plus credit spread of 140 basis points. Subsequent to June 30, 2006, the credit spread was reduced to 120 basis points and the maturity date was extended to November 2006. |
12
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
DEBT MATURITIES AND PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS
JUNE 30, 2006
(In thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Schedule of Maturities | |
Property | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2010 | | | Thereafter | | | Total | |
Ardentech Court | | $ | 45 | | | $ | 94 | | | $ | 101 | | | $ | 109 | | | $ | 118 | | | $ | 4,236 | | | $ | 4,703 | |
Bayshore Boulevard | | | 190 | | | | 394 | | | | 413 | | | | 432 | | | | 14,491 | | | | — | | | | 15,920 | |
Bridgeview Technology Park I | | | 54 | | | | 117 | | | | 124 | | | | 137 | | | | 149 | | | | 11,097 | | | | 11,678 | |
Eisenhower Road | | | 19 | | | | 50 | | | | 2,114 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,183 | |
Elliott Avenue | | | 257 | | | | 16,020 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 16,277 | |
40 Erie Street | | | 582 | | | | 1,058 | | | | 17,534 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 19,174 | |
Kendall Square D | | | 727 | | | | 1,526 | | | | 1,627 | | | | 1,733 | | | | 1,847 | | | | 64,230 | | | | 71,690 | |
Lucent Drive | | | 107 | | | | 191 | | | | 202 | | | | 214 | | | | 215 | | | | 4,896 | | | | 5,825 | |
Monte Villa Parkway | | | 116 | | | | 240 | | | | 251 | | | | 263 | | | | 8,822 | | | | — | | | | 9,692 | |
Nancy Ridge Drive | | | 40 | | | | 86 | | | | 91 | | | | 100 | | | | 107 | | | | 6,488 | | | | 6,912 | |
Science Center Drive | | | 66 | | | | 143 | | | | 152 | | | | 167 | | | | 182 | | | | 10,800 | | | | 11,510 | |
Sidney Street | | | 354 | | | | 746 | | | | 802 | | | | 862 | | | | 926 | | | | 27,396 | | | | 31,086 | |
Towne Centre Drive | | | 265 | | | | 548 | | | | 574 | | | | 601 | | | | 20,149 | | | | — | | | | 22,137 | |
900 Uniqema Boulevard | | | 66 | | | | 139 | | | | 152 | | | | 166 | | | | 180 | | | | 1,011 | | | | 1,714 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total fixed rate notes | | | 2,888 | | | | 21,352 | | | | 24,137 | | | | 4,784 | | | | 47,186 | | | | 130,154 | | | | 230,501 | |
$250 million secured term loan | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 250,000 | | | | — | | | | 250,000 | |
$500 million unsecured line of credit | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 60,800 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 60,800 | |
$150 million bridge loan | | | 150,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 150,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total consolidated debt | | | 152,888 | | | | 21,352 | | | | 24,137 | | | | 65,584 | | | | 297,186 | | | | 130,154 | | | | 691,301 | |
McKellar Court (21%) | | | 12 | | | | 27 | | | | 29 | | | | 32 | | | | 2,142 | | | | — | | | | 2,242 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total consolidated and pro rata share of unconsolidated partnership debt | | $ | 152,900 | | | $ | 21,379 | | | $ | 24,166 | | | $ | 65,616 | | | $ | 299,328 | | | $ | 130,154 | | | $ | 693,543 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
13
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
COMMON STOCK DATA
JUNE 30, 2006
(Shares in thousands)
SUMMARY OF COMMON SHARES
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | | Six Months Ended | |
| | 6/30/06 | | | 3/31/06 | | | 6/30/06 | | | 6/30/05 | |
Weighted average shares outstanding | | | 51,394 | | | | 46,370 | | | | 48,895 | | | | 31,515 | |
Weighted average units outstanding | | | 2,864 | | | | 2,864 | | | | 2,864 | | | | 2,870 | |
Dilutive effect of restricted stock | | | 150 | | | | 163 | | | | 180 | | | | 81 | |
Dilutive effect of stock warrant | | | 126 | | | | 121 | | | | 124 | | | | 78 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted shares — EPS and FFO | | | 54,534 | | | | 49,518 | | | | 52,063 | | | | 34,544 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
COMMON STOCK DATA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 6/30/06 | | | 3/31/06 | | | 12/31/05 | | | 9/30/05 | |
Shares outstanding | | | 56,890 | | | | 46,444 | | | | 46,290 | | | | 46,290 | |
Units outstanding | | | 2,864 | | | | 2,864 | | | | 2,864 | | | | 2,870 | |
Unvested restricted shares outstanding | | | 339 | | | | 338 | | | | 344 | | | | 346 | |
Stock warrant outstanding | | | 270 | | | | 270 | | | | 270 | | | | 270 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total common shares outstanding | | | 60,363 | | | | 49,916 | | | | 49,768 | | | | 49,776 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | |
| | 6/30/06 | | | 3/31/06 | | | 12/31/05 | | | 9/30/05 | |
High Price | | $ | 29.94 | | | $ | 29.86 | | | $ | 26.06 | | | $ | 25.60 | |
Low Price | | $ | 25.95 | | | $ | 23.75 | | | $ | 22.25 | | | $ | 22.30 | |
Average Closing Price | | $ | 28.12 | | | $ | 27.22 | | | $ | 24.85 | | | $ | 24.27 | |
Closing Price | | $ | 29.94 | | | $ | 29.64 | | | $ | 24.40 | | | $ | 24.80 | |
Dividends per share — Annualized | | $ | 1.16 | | | $ | 1.16 | | | $ | 1.08 | | | $ | 1.08 | |
Closing Dividend Yield — Annualized | | | 3.9 | % | | | 3.9 | % | | | 4.4 | % | | | 4.4 | % |
DIVIDENDS PER COMMON SHARE
| | | | |
2006 | | | | |
First quarter | | $ | 0.29 | |
Second quarter | | $ | 0.29 | |
| | | | |
2005 | | | | |
First quarter | | $ | 0.27 | |
Second quarter | | $ | 0.27 | |
Third quarter | | $ | 0.27 | |
Fourth quarter | | $ | 0.27 | |
| | | | |
2004 | | | | |
Third quarter | | $ | 0.1497 | |
Fourth quarter | | $ | 0.2700 | |
| | | | |
Latest Dividend | | | | |
Amount | | $ | 0.29 | |
Declared | | May 19, 2006 |
Record | | June 30, 2006 |
Paid | | July 17, 2006 |
| | | | |
Trading Symbol | | | | |
BMR | | | | |
|
Stock Exchange Listing | | | | |
New York Stock Exchange | | | | |
|
Transfer Agent | | | | |
The Bank of New York | | | | |
101 Barclay Street, 11E | | | | |
New York, NY 10286 | | | | |
212.815.3782 | | | | |
14
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
SAME PROPERTY ANALYSIS
JUNE 30, 2006
(Dollars in thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended (1) | |
| | 6/30/06 | | | 6/30/05 | | | % Change | |
Total Same Property Portfolio | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Number of properties | | | 20 | | | | 20 | | | | | |
Rentable square feet | | | 2,799,630 | | | | 2,795,086 | | | | | |
Percent of total portfolio | | | 47.8 | % | | | 65.7 | % | | | | |
Leased % | | | 90.8 | % | | | 92.0 | % | | | | |
Redevelopment % | | | 5.5 | % | | | 4.7 | % | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rental | | $ | 15,575 | | | $ | 15,141 | | | | 2.9 | % |
Tenant recoveries | | | 7,401 | | | | 7,241 | | | | 2.2 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | | | 22,976 | | | | 22,382 | | | | 2.7 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rental operations | | | 6,108 | | | | 5,886 | | | | 3.8 | % |
Real estate taxes | | | 1,849 | | | | 1,779 | | | | 3.9 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total expenses | | | 7,957 | | | | 7,665 | | | | 3.8 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net operating income (2) | | $ | 15,019 | | | $ | 14,717 | | | | 2.1 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Same property net operating income (2) | | $ | 15,019 | | | $ | 14,717 | | | | 2.1 | % |
Less straight line rents and fair value lease revenue lease revenue | | | (938 | ) | | | (1,049 | ) | | | (10.6 | %) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Same property net operating income — cash basis (2) (3) | | $ | 14,081 | | | $ | 13,668 | | | | 3.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rental revenue — cash basis (3) | | $ | 14,637 | | | $ | 14,092 | | | | 3.9 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Same property net operating income (2) | | $ | 15,019 | | | $ | 14,717 | | | | 2.1 | % |
Plus other income | | | — | | | | (56 | ) | | | (100.0 | %) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Same property net operating income — including non-recurring items | | $ | 15,019 | | | $ | 14,661 | | | | 2.4 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Properties included in same property quarterly analysis are Ardentech Court, Balboa Avenue, Bayshore Boulevard, Beckley Street, Bernardo Center Drive, Bridgeview Technology Park I, Bridgeview Technology Park II, Eisenhower Road, Elliott Avenue, Graphics Drive, Industrial Road, King of Prussia, Landmark at Eastview, McKellar Court (an unconsolidated partnership of which we own 21%), Monte Villa Parkway, San Diego Science Center, Science Center Drive, Towne Centre Drive, Tributary Street, and Waples Street. |
|
(2) | | For a definition and discussion of net operating income, see page 24. For a quantitative reconciliation of net operating income to net income in accordance with GAAP, see page 10. |
|
(3) | | Represents increase in rents on a “cash on cash” basis. |
15
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
PORTFOLIO SUMMARY AND LEASE EXPIRATIONS
JUNE 30, 2006
PORTFOLIO SUMMARY
Weighted average remaining lease term is 8.7 years.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Annualized | | | | | | | | | | | Annualized | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Percent of | | | | | | | Percent of | | | Base Rent | | | | | | | Percent of | | | Base Rent | |
| | | | | | | | | | Rentable | | | Total | | | Annualized | | | Annualized | | | per Leased | | | Annualized | | | Annualized | | | per Leased | |
| | | | | | | | | | Square | | | Rentable | | | Base Rent | | | Base Rent | | | Sq Ft | | | Base Rent | | | Base Rent | | | Sq Ft | |
Market | | Properties | | | | | | | Feet | | | Sq Ft | | | Current (1) | | | Current | | | Current | | | at Expiration | | | at Expiration | | | at Expiration | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | |
Boston (2) | | | 11 | | | | | | | | 1,297,786 | | | | 22.3 | % | | $ | 48,765 | | | | 29.8 | % | | $ | 38.73 | | | $ | 53,227 | | | | 26.8 | % | | $ | 42.27 | |
San Francisco | | | 9 | | | | | | | | 1,028,093 | | | | 17.5 | % | | | 19,596 | | | | 12.0 | % | | | 23.02 | | | | 25,314 | | | | 12.8 | % | | | 29.73 | |
San Diego (3) | | | 9 | | | | | | | | 565,364 | | | | 9.6 | % | | | 15,367 | | | | 9.4 | % | | | 30.64 | | | | 17,971 | | | | 9.1 | % | | | 35.83 | |
New York / New Jersey | | | 3 | | | | | | | | 873,369 | | | | 14.8 | % | | | 14,260 | | | | 8.7 | % | | | 19.59 | | | | 15,238 | | | | 7.7 | % | | | 20.93 | |
Pennsylvania | | | 6 | | | | | | | | 701,873 | | | | 12.0 | % | | | 13,676 | | | | 8.4 | % | | | 22.00 | | | | 13,802 | | | | 7.0 | % | | | 22.21 | |
Seattle | | | 3 | | | | | | | | 185,989 | | | | 3.2 | % | | | 7,114 | | | | 4.4 | % | | | 38.25 | | | | 7,732 | | | | 3.9 | % | | | 41.57 | |
Maryland | | | 4 | | | | | | | | 1,093,787 | | | | 18.6 | % | | | 42,204 | | | | 25.8 | % | | | 38.58 | | | | 61,515 | | | | 31.1 | % | | | 56.24 | |
University Related — Other | | | 2 | | | | | | | | 115,150 | | | | 2.0 | % | | | 2,448 | | | | 1.5 | % | | | 21.26 | | | | 3,179 | | | | 1.6 | % | | | 27.61 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / weighted average | | | 47 | | | | | | | | 5,861,411 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 163,429 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 30.51 | | | $ | 197,978 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 36.96 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
LEASE EXPIRATIONS
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Percent of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Total | | | | | | | | | | | Annualized | | | | | | | | | | | Annualized | |
| | Rentable | | | Rentable | | | | | | | Percent of | | | Base Rent | | | | | | | Percent of | | | Base Rent | |
| | Square Feet | | | Sq Ft | | | Annualized | | | Annualized | | | per Leased | | | Annualized | | | Annualized | | | per Leased | |
| | of Expiring | | | of Expiring | | | Base Rent | | | Base Rent | | | Sq Ft | | | Base Rent | | | Base Rent | | | Sq Ft | |
Year of Lease Expiration | | Leases | | | Leases | | | Current (1) | | | Current | | | Current | | | at Expiration | | | at Expiration | | | at Expiration | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | |
2006 (4) | | | 175,045 | | | | | | | | 3.3 | % | | $ | 4,025 | | | | 2.5 | % | | $ | 23.00 | | | $ | 4,025 | | | | 2.0 | % | | $ | 23.00 | |
2007 | | | 531,737 | | | | | | | | 9.9 | % | | | 10,622 | | | | 6.5 | % | | | 19.98 | | | | 10,828 | | | | 5.5 | % | | | 20.36 | |
2008 | | | 304,081 | | | | | | | | 5.7 | % | | | 8,874 | | | | 5.4 | % | | | 29.18 | | | | 9,098 | | | | 4.6 | % | | | 29.92 | |
2009 | | | 409,853 | | | | | | | | 7.7 | % | | | 9,469 | | | | 5.8 | % | | | 23.10 | | | | 9,767 | | | | 4.9 | % | | | 23.83 | |
2010 | | | 781,736 | | | | | | | | 14.6 | % | | | 19,744 | | | | 12.1 | % | | | 25.26 | | | | 19,618 | | | | 9.9 | % | | | 25.09 | |
2011 | | | 172,687 | | | | | | | | 3.2 | % | | | 5,811 | | | | 3.6 | % | | | 33.65 | | | | 7,297 | | | | 3.7 | % | | | 42.26 | |
2012 | | | 224,942 | | | | | | | | 4.2 | % | | | 5,747 | | | | 3.5 | % | | | 25.55 | | | | 6,773 | | | | 3.4 | % | | | 30.11 | |
2013 | | | 194,986 | | | | | | | | 3.6 | % | | | 2,730 | | | | 1.7 | % | | | 14.00 | | | | 4,371 | | | | 2.2 | % | | | 22.42 | |
2014 | | | 238,252 | | | | | | | | 4.4 | % | | | 7,007 | | | | 4.3 | % | | | 29.41 | | | | 8,350 | | | | 4.2 | % | | | 35.05 | |
2015 | | | 148,666 | | | | | | | | 2.8 | % | | | 3,688 | | | | 2.3 | % | | | 24.81 | | | | 4,159 | | | | 2.1 | % | | | 27.98 | |
Thereafter | | | 2,174,570 | | | | | | | | 40.6 | % | | | 85,712 | | | | 52.3 | % | | | 39.42 | | | | 113,693 | | | | 57.5 | % | | | 52.28 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total / weighted average | | | 5,356,555 | | | | | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 163,429 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 30.51 | | | $ | 197,978 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 36.96 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Based on current annualized base rent. Current annualized base rent is the monthly contractual rent as of June 30, 2006, or if rent has not yet commenced, the first monthly rent payment due, multiplied by 12 months. |
|
(2) | | Excludes parking revenue of $1,063,000 for 47 Erie Street Parking Structure. |
|
(3) | | Includes 72,863 square feet of McKellar Court, an unconsolidated partnership, of which we own 21%. |
|
(4) | | Includes current month to month leases. |
16
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
OCCUPANCY SUMMARY
JUNE 30, 2006
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Rentable Square Feet | |
Market | | Leased | | | Redevelopment | | | Vacant | | | Total | |
Boston | | | 1,259,089 | | | | — | | | | 38,697 | | | | 1,297,786 | |
San Francisco | | | 851,453 | | | | 152,203 | | | | 24,437 | | | | 1,028,093 | |
San Diego | | | 501,509 | | | | 21,952 | | | | 41,903 | | | | 565,364 | |
New York / New Jersey | | | 728,085 | | | | 89,689 | | | | 55,595 | | | | 873,369 | |
Pennsylvania | | | 621,493 | | | | 80,380 | | | | — | | | | 701,873 | |
Seattle | | | 185,989 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 185,989 | |
Maryland | | | 1,093,787 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,093,787 | |
University Related — Other | | | 115,150 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 115,150 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 5,356,555 | | | | 344,224 | | | | 160,632 | | | | 5,861,411 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Leased | |
| | 6/30/06 | | | 3/31/06 | | | 12/31/05 | | | 9/30/05 | | | 6/30/05 | |
Boston | | | 97.0 | % | | | 97.2 | % | | | 97.1 | % | | | 97.1 | % | | | 95.9 | % |
San Francisco | | | 82.8 | % | | | 75.1 | % | | | 80.7 | % | | | 79.7 | % | | | 89.1 | % |
San Diego | | | 88.7 | % | | | 88.1 | % | | | 87.9 | % | | | 88.8 | % | | | 91.9 | % |
New York / New Jersey | | | 83.4 | % | | | 88.7 | % | | | 90.1 | % | | | 87.5 | % | | | 87.7 | % |
Pennsylvania | | | 88.5 | % | | | 88.5 | % | | | 92.4 | % | | | 91.5 | % | | | 90.6 | % |
Seattle | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
Maryland | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
University Related — Other | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 91.4 | % | | | 89.2 | % | | | 91.1 | % | | | 90.6 | % | | | 92.3 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Redevelopment | |
| | 6/30/06 | | | 3/31/06 | | | 12/31/05 | | | 9/30/05 | | | 6/30/05 | |
Boston | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
San Francisco | | | 14.8 | % | | | 22.4 | % | | | 16.7 | % | | | 17.4 | % | | | 7.6 | % |
San Diego | | | 3.9 | % | | | 3.9 | % | | | 3.9 | % | | | 2.7 | % | | | 2.8 | % |
New York / New Jersey | | | 10.3 | % | | | 4.9 | % | | | 4.9 | % | | | 7.5 | % | | | 7.5 | % |
Pennsylvania | | | 11.5 | % | | | 11.5 | % | | | 7.6 | % | | | 8.5 | % | | | 9.4 | % |
Seattle | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Maryland | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
University Related — Other | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 5.9 | % | | | 7.5 | % | | | 5.8 | % | | | 6.1 | % | | | 4.3 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Vacancy | |
| | 6/30/06 | | | 3/31/06 | | | 12/31/05 | | | 9/30/05 | | | 6/30/05 | |
Boston | | | 3.0 | % | | | 2.8 | % | | | 2.9 | % | | | 2.9 | % | | | 4.1 | % |
San Francisco | | | 2.4 | % | | | 2.6 | % | | | 2.6 | % | | | 2.9 | % | | | 3.3 | % |
San Diego | | | 7.4 | % | | | 8.0 | % | | | 8.2 | % | | | 8.5 | % | | | 5.3 | % |
New York / New Jersey | | | 6.4 | % | | | 6.4 | % | | | 5.0 | % | | | 5.0 | % | | | 4.8 | % |
Pennsylvania | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Seattle | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Maryland | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
University Related — Other | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 2.7 | % | | | 3.3 | % | | | 3.1 | % | | | 3.3 | % | | | 3.4 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
17
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
PROPERTY LISTING
JUNE 30, 2006
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Rentable | | | Percent of | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Square | | | Rentable | | | Percent Leased | |
| | Property | | Acquisition Date | | Buildings | | | Feet | | | Sq Ft | | | 6/30/06 | | | 3/31/06 | | | 12/31/05 | | | 9/30/05 | |
| | Boston | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 | | Albany Street | | May 31, 2005 | | | 2 | | | | 75,003 | | | | 1.4 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 99.8 | % |
2 | | 58 Charles Street | | April 7, 2006 | | | 1 | | | | 47,912 | | | | 0.8 | % | | | 93.6 | % | | | n/a | | | | n/a | | | | n/a | |
3 | | Coolidge Avenue | | April 5, 2005 | | | 1 | | | | 37,400 | | | | 0.7 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
4 | | 21 Erie Street | | May 31, 2005 | | | 1 | | | | 49,247 | | | | 0.8 | % | | | 56.9 | % | | | 56.9 | % | | | 56.9 | % | | | 56.9 | % |
5 | | 40 Erie Street | | May 31, 2005 | | | 1 | | | | 100,854 | | | | 1.7 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
6 | | Fresh Pond Research Park | | April 5, 2005 | | | 6 | | | | 90,702 | | | | 1.5 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
7 | | Kendall Square A | | May 31, 2005 | | | 1 | | | | 302,919 | | | | 5.2 | % | | | 97.1 | % | | | 97.1 | % | | | 96.7 | % | | | 96.7 | % |
8 | | Kendall Square D | | May 31, 2005 | | | 1 | | | | 349,325 | | | | 6.0 | % | | | 98.3 | % | | | 98.5 | % | | | 98.5 | % | | | 98.5 | % |
9 | | Sidney Street | | May 31, 2005 | | | 1 | | | | 191,904 | | | | 3.3 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
10 | | Vassar Street | | May 31, 2005 | | | 1 | | | | 52,520 | | | | 0.9 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
11 | | 47 Erie Street Parking Structure | | May 31, 2005 | | | 1 | | | 447 Stalls | | | — | | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total Boston | | | | | 17 | | | | 1,297,786 | | | | 22.3 | % | | | 97.0 | % | | | 97.2 | % | | | 97.1 | % | | | 97.1 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | San Francisco | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
12 | | Ardentech Court | | November 18, 2004 | | | 1 | | | | 55,588 | | | | 0.9 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
13 | | Ardenwood Venture (1) | | June 14, 2006 | | | 1 | | | | 72,500 | | | | 1.2 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | n/a | | | | n/a | | | | n/a | |
14 | | Bayshore Boulevard | | August 17, 2004 | | | 1 | | | | 183,344 | | | | 3.1 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 66.5 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
15 | | Bridgeview Technology Park I | | September 10, 2004 | | | 2 | | | | 212,673 | | | | 3.6 | % | | | 67.8 | % | | | 67.8 | % | | | 67.8 | % | | | 77.5 | % |
16 | | Bridgeview Technology Park II | | March 16, 2005 | | | 1 | | | | 50,400 | | | | 0.9 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
17 | | Dumbarton Circle | | May 27, 2005 | | | 3 | | | | 44,000 | | | | 0.8 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
18 | | Eccles Avenue | | December 1, 2005 | | | 1 | | | | 152,145 | | | | 2.6 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | n/a | |
19 | | Industrial Road | | August 17, 2004 | | | 1 | | | | 169,490 | | | | 2.9 | % | | | 88.1 | % | | | 88.1 | % | | | 83.6 | % | | | 83.6 | % |
20 | | Kaiser Drive | | August 25, 2005 | | | 1 | | | | 87,953 | | | | 1.5 | % | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total San Francisco | | | | | 12 | | | | 1,028,093 | | | | 17.5 | % | | | 82.8 | % | | | 75.1 | % | | | 80.7 | % | | | 79.7 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | San Diego | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
21 | | Balboa Avenue | | August 13, 2004 | | | 1 | | | | 35,344 | | | | 0.6 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
22 | | Bernardo Center Drive | | August 13, 2004 | | | 1 | | | | 61,286 | | | | 1.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
23 | | Faraday Avenue | | September 19, 2005 | | | 1 | | | | 28,704 | | | | 0.5 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
24 | | McKellar Court (2) | | September 30, 2004 | | | 1 | | | | 72,863 | | | | 1.2 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
25 | | Nancy Ridge Drive | | April 21, 2005 | | | 1 | | | | 42,138 | | | | 0.7 | % | | | 58.0 | % | | | 67.4 | % | | | 67.4 | % | | | 67.4 | % |
26 | | San Diego Science Center | | October 21, 2004 | | | 1 | | | | 105,364 | | | | 1.8 | % | | | 77.0 | % | | | 70.1 | % | | | 69.0 | % | | | 68.2 | % |
27 | | Science Center Drive | | September 24, 2004 | | | 1 | | | | 53,740 | | | | 0.9 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
28 | | Towne Centre Drive | | August 12, 2004 | | | 3 | | | | 115,870 | | | | 2.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
29 | | Waples Street (3) | | March 1, 2005 | | | 1 | | | | 50,055 | | | | 0.9 | % | | | 56.1 | % | | | 56.1 | % | | | 56.1 | % | | | 65.3 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total San Diego | | | | | 11 | | | | 565,364 | | | | 9.6 | % | | | 88.7 | % | | | 88.1 | % | | | 87.9 | % | | | 88.8 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | New York / New Jersey | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
30 | | Graphics Drive | | March 17, 2005 | | | 1 | | | | 72,300 | | | | 1.2 | % | | | 44.3 | % | | | 44.3 | % | | | 44.3 | % | | | 14.8 | % |
31 | | Landmark at Eastview | | August 12, 2004 | | | 8 | | | | 751,648 | | | | 12.8 | % | | | 92.6 | % | | | 92.9 | % | | | 94.5 | % | | | 94.5 | % |
32 | | One Research Way | | May 31, 2006 | | | 1 | | | | 49,421 | | | | 0.8 | % | | | — | | | | n/a | | | | n/a | | | | n/a | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total New York / New Jersey | | | | | 10 | | | | 873,369 | | | | 14.8 | % | | | 83.4 | % | | | 88.7 | % | | | 90.1 | % | | | 87.5 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Pennsylvania | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
33 | | Eisenhower Road | | August 13, 2004 | | | 1 | | | | 27,750 | | | | 0.5 | % | | | — | | | | — | | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
34 | | George Patterson Boulevard | | October 28, 2005 | | | 1 | | | | 71,500 | | | | 1.2 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | n/a | |
35 | | King of Prussia (4) | | August 11, 2004 | | | 5 | | | | 427,109 | | | | 7.3 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
36 | | Phoenixville Pike | | April 5, 2005 | | | 1 | | | | 104,400 | | | | 1.8 | % | | | 49.6 | % | | | 49.6 | % | | | 49.6 | % | | | 49.6 | % |
37 | | 1000 Uniqema Boulevard | | September 30, 2005 | | | 1 | | | | 59,821 | | | | 1.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
38 | | 900 Uniqema Boulevard | | January 13, 2006 | | | 1 | | | | 11,293 | | | | 0.2 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | n/a | | | | n/a | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total Pennsylvania | | | | | 10 | | | | 701,873 | | | | 12.0 | % | | | 88.5 | % | | | 88.5 | % | | | 92.4 | % | | | 91.5 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Seattle | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
39 | | Elliott Avenue | | August 24, 2004 | | | 1 | | | | 134,989 | | | | 2.3 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
40 | | Monte Villa Parkway | | August 17, 2004 | | | 1 | | | | 51,000 | | | | 0.9 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
41 | | Fairview Avenue (5) | | January 12, 2006 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | n/a | | | | n/a | | | | n/a | | | | n/a | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total Seattle | | | | | 2 | | | | 185,989 | | | | 3.2 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Maryland | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
42 | | Beckley Street | | December 17, 2004 | | | 1 | | | | 77,225 | | | | 1.3 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
43 | | Belward Campus Drive | | May 24, 2006 | | | 1 | | | | 289,912 | | | | 4.9 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | n/a | | | | n/a | | | | n/a | |
44 | | Shady Grove Road | | May 24, 2006 | | | 4 | | | | 635,058 | | | | 10.8 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | n/a | | | | n/a | | | | n/a | |
45 | | Tributary Street | | December 17, 2004 | | | 1 | | | | 91,592 | | | | 1.6 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total Maryland | | | | | 7 | | | | 1,093,787 | | | | 18.6 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | University Related — Other | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
46 | | Colorow Drive | | December 22, 2005 | | | 1 | | | | 93,650 | | | | 1.6 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | n/a | |
47 | | Lucent Drive | | May 31, 2005 | | | 1 | | | | 21,500 | | | | 0.4 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total University Related — Other | | | | | 2 | | | | 115,150 | | | | 2.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total / weighted average | | | | | 71 | | | | 5,861,411 | | | | 100.0 | % | | | 91.4 | % | | | 89.2 | % | | | 91.1 | % | | | 90.6 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | We own 87.5% of the limited liability company that owns the Ardenwood Venture property. |
|
(2) | | We own a general partnership interest in the limited partnership that owns the McKellar Court property, which entitiles us to 75% of the gains upon a sale of the property and 21% of the operating cash flows. This property is an unconsolidated partnership. |
|
(3) | | We own 70% of the limited liability company that owns the Waples Street property. |
|
(4) | | We own an 88.5% limited partnership interest and a 0.5% general partnership interest in the limited partnership that owns the King of Prussia property. |
|
(5) | | We own 70% of the limited liability company that owns the Fairview Avenue development site. |
18
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
10 LARGEST TENANTS (1)
JUNE 30, 2006
As of June 30, 2006, our properties were leased to 94 tenants.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Annualized | | | Percent of | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Percent of | | | | | | | Base Rent | | | Annualized | | | | |
| | | | Leased | | | Leased Sq Ft | | | Annualized | | | per Leased | | | Base Rent | | | Lease | |
| | | | Square | | | Total | | | Base Rent | | | Sq Ft | | | Current | | | Expiration | |
Tenant | | Feet | | | Portfolio | | | Current (1) | | | Current | | | Total Portfolio | | | Date(s) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 | | Human Genome Sciences, Inc. | | | 924,970 | | | | 15.8 | % | | $ | 39,500 | | | $ | 42.70 | | | | 24.2 | % | | May 2026
|
2 | | Vertex Pharmaceuticals | | | 583,474 | | | | 10.0 | % | | | 23,362 | | | | 40.04 | | | | 14.3 | % | | April 2018(2)
|
3 | | Genzyme Corporation | | | 343,000 | | | | 5.9 | % | | | 15,399 | | | | 44.89 | | | | 9.4 | % | | July 2018
|
4 | | Centocor, Inc. (Johnson & Johnson) | | | 331,398 | | | | 5.7 | % | | | 8,034 | | | | 24.24 | | | | 4.9 | % | | March 2010
|
5 | | Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | | | 227,932 | | | | 3.9 | % | | | 4,206 | | | | 18.45 | | | | 2.6 | % | | December 2009(3)
|
6 | | Illumina, Inc. | | | 115,870 | | | | 2.0 | % | | | 3,938 | | | | 33.99 | | | | 2.4 | % | | August 2014
|
7 | | Nektar Therapeutics | | | 79,917 | | | | 1.4 | % | | | 3,812 | | | | 47.70 | | | | 2.3 | % | | October 2016
|
8 | | InterMune, Inc. | | | 71,308 | | | | 1.2 | % | | | 3,666 | | | | 51.41 | | | | 2.2 | % | | April 2011
|
9 | | sanofi-aventis U.S. Inc. | | | 73,347 | | | | 1.3 | % | | | 3,420 | | | | 46.62 | | | | 2.1 | % | | September 2018
|
10 | | Chemtura Corporation | | | 182,829 | | | | 3.1 | % | | | 3,377 | | | | 18.47 | | | | 2.1 | % | | December 2009
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total / weighted average (4) | | | 2,934,045 | | | | 50.3 | % | | $ | 108,714 | | | $ | 37.05 | | | | 66.5 | % | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Based on current annualized base rent. Current annualized base rent is the monthly contractual rent as of June 30, 2006, or if rent has not yet commenced, the first monthly rent payment due, multiplied by 12 months. |
|
(2) | | 41,532 square feet expires March 2009, 191,904 square feet expires August 2010, 59,322 square feet expires December 2010, and 290,716 square feet expires April 2018. |
|
(3) | | 154,205 square feet expires December 2007 and 73,727 square feet expires December 2009. |
|
(4) | | Without regard to any early lease terminations and/or renewal options. |
19
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
REDEVELOPMENT AND LAND DEVELOPMENT PARCELS
JUNE 30, 2006
REDEVELOPMENT(1)
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Square Feet | |
| | | | | | Under | |
Property | | Market | | | Redevelopment(2) | |
Bridgeview Technology Park I | | San Francisco | | | 44,127 | |
Eisenhower Road | | Pennsylvania | | | 27,750 | |
Graphics Drive | | New York / New Jersey | | | 40,268 | |
Industrial Road | | San Francisco | | | 20,123 | |
Kaiser Drive | | San Francisco | | | 87,953 | |
One Research Way | | New York / New Jersey | | | 49,421 | |
Phoenixville Pike | | Pennsylvania | | | 52,630 | |
Waples Street | | San Diego | | | 21,952 | |
| | | | | | |
Total | | | | | | | 344,224 | |
| | | | | | | |
LAND DEVELOPMENT PARCELS(3)
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Developable | |
Property | | Market | | | Square Feet (4) | |
Eccles Avenue | | San Francisco | | | 108,000 | |
Fairview Avenue | | Seattle | | | 93,000 | |
Fresh Pond Research Park | | Boston | | | 50,000 | |
Landmark at Eastview | | New York / New Jersey | | | 464,000 | |
Shady Grove Road | | Maryland | | | 500,000 | |
Towne Centre Drive | | San Diego | | | 84,000 | |
| | | | | | | |
Total | | | | | | | 1,299,000 | |
| | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Our redevelopment includes activities necessary for permanent change to office/laboratory space. |
|
(2) | | For our properties undergoing redevelopment, only the square footage undergoing redevelopment activities is reflected in the portfolio statistics. |
|
(3) | | These sites represent possible future developments, which are in proximity to the properties listed in the table. These developments will be impacted by the timing and likelihood of success of the entitlement process, both of which are uncertain. |
|
(4) | | Management’s estimates. |
20
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
ACQUISITIONS
JUNE 30, 2006
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Rentable | | | | |
| | # of | | | Square | | | | |
Acquisitions since August 11, 2004: | | Properties | | | Feet (1) | | | Investment | |
| | | | | | | | | | (in thousands) | |
Third Quarter 2004 (2) | | | 13 | | | | 2,297,106 | | | $ | 467,785 | |
Fourth Quarter 2004 | | | 4 | | | | 329,769 | | | | 65,650 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total acquisitions during 2004 | | | 17 | | | | 2,626,875 | | | | 533,435 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
First Quarter 2005 | | | 3 | | | | 165,736 | | | | 29,330 | |
Second Quarter 2005 | | | 14 | | | | 1,461,912 | | | | 592,529 | |
Third Quarter 2005 | | | 3 | | | | 176,478 | | | | 33,500 | |
Fourth Quarter 2005 | | | 3 | | | | 317,295 | | | | 59,800 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total acquisitions during 2005 | | | 23 | | | | 2,121,421 | | | | 715,159 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
First Quarter 2006 | | | 2 | | | | 11,293 | | | | 7,819 | |
Second Quarter 2006 | | | 5 | | | | 1,094,803 | | | | 462,953 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total acquisitions during 2006 | | | 7 | | | | 1,106,096 | | | | 470,772 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total Acquisitions | | | 47 | | | | 5,854,392 | | | $ | 1,719,366 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
2006 Acquisitions:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Rentable | | | | | | | Percent | |
| | | | | | Square | | | | | | | Leased at | |
Property | | Market | | Closing Date | | Feet | | | Investment | | | Acquisition | |
| | | | | | | | | | (in thousands) | | | | | |
First Quarter 2006 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fairview Avenue | | Seattle | | January 12, 2006 | | | — | | | $ | 2,703 | | | | — | (3) |
900 Uniqema Boulevard | | Pennsylvania | | January 13, 2006 | | | 11,293 | | | | 5,116 | | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
First Quarter Total | | | | | | | 11,293 | | | $ | 7,819 | | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Second Quarter 2006 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
58 Charles Street | | Boston | | April 7, 2006 | | | 47,912 | | | $ | 13,225 | | | | 93.6 | % |
Belward Campus Drive | | Maryland | | May 24, 2006 | | | 289,912 | | | | 200,966 | | | | 100.0 | % |
Shady Grove Road | | Maryland | | May 24, 2006 | | | 635,058 | | | | 226,080 | | | | 100.0 | % |
One Research Way | | New York / New Jersey | | May 31, 2006 | | | 49,421 | | | | 8,484 | | | | — | (4) |
Ardenwood Venture (5) | | San Francisco | | June 14, 2006 | | | 72,500 | | | | 14,198 | | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Second Quarter Total | | | | | | | 1,094,803 | | | $ | 462,953 | | | | 95.2 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Rentable square feet at the time of acquisition. |
|
(2) | | We commenced operations on August 11, 2004, the date of our initial public offering. |
|
(3) | | On January 12, 2006, we completed the acquisition of the land at 530 Fairview Avenue in Seattle, Washington through our partnership with an affiliate of EDG Commercial Real Estate. We entered into the partnership to develop a five-story, 93,000 square-foot laboratory facility. |
|
(4) | | The entire property was undergoing redevelopment from the date of acquisition. |
|
(5) | | We own 87.5% of the limited liability company that owns the Ardenwood Venture property. |
21
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
LEASING ACTIVITY (1)
JUNE 30, 2006
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Current | | | | |
| | Leased | | | Annualized | | | | |
| | Square | | | Base Rent per | | | Percent | |
| | Feet | | | Leased Sq Ft | | | Leased | |
Leased Square Feet as of December 31, 2005 | | | 4,332,323 | | | $ | 27.45 | | | | 91.1 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
First quarter acquisitions | | | 11,293 | | | | 37.63 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Leased Square Feet including acquisitions | | | 4,343,616 | | | | | | | | | |
Expirations | | | (127,837 | ) | | | 14.99 | | | | | |
Renewals | | | 6,690 | | | | 29.48 | | | | | |
New Leases | | | 29,955 | | | | 16.22 | | | | | |
Terminations | | | — | | | | — | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Leased Square Feet as of March 31, 2006 | | | 4,252,424 | | | | | | | | | |
Second quarter acquisitions | | | 1,042,332 | | | | 40.68 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Leased Square Feet including acquisitions | | | 5,294,756 | | | | | | | | | |
Expirations | | | (94,953 | ) | | | 42.49 | | | | | |
Renewals | | | 3,200 | | | | 29.04 | | | | | |
New Leases | | | 158,003 | | | | 32.24 | | | | | |
Terminations | | | (4,451 | ) | | | 20.22 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Leased Square Feet as of June 30, 2006 | | | 5,356,555 | | | $ | 30.51 | | | | 91.4 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Leasing activity for leases signed during the periods presented, which may be different than the period of actual occupancy. Tenant improvement and leasing costs are also shown in this manner on page 23. |
22
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
TENANT IMPROVEMENTS AND LEASING COMMISSIONS
JUNE 30, 2006
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | |
| | 6/30/06 | | | 3/31/06 | | | 12/31/05 | | | 9/30/05 | | | 6/30/05 | |
Renewals (1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Number of renewals | | | 1 | | | | 2 | | | | — | | | | 1 | | | | 1 | |
Square feet | | | 3,200 | | | | 6,690 | | | | — | | | | 1,197 | | | | 1,667 | |
Tenant improvement costs per square foot (2) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
Leasing commission costs per square foot (2) | | | 1.74 | | | | 2.73 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total tenant improvement and leasing commission costs psf | | $ | 1.74 | | | $ | 2.73 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
New Leases (3) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Number of leases | | | 11 | | | | 7 | | | | 7 | | | | 5 | | | | 4 | |
Square feet | | | 158,003 | | | | 29,955 | | | | 45,946 | | | | 24,781 | | | | 111,261 | |
Tenant improvement costs per square foot (2) | | $ | 24.78 | | | $ | 38.36 | | | $ | 16.16 | | | $ | 9.14 | | | $ | 32.89 | |
Leasing commission costs per square foot (2) | | | 7.45 | | | | 3.33 | | | | 5.50 | | | | 1.16 | | | | 4.75 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total tenant improvement and leasing commission costs psf | | $ | 32.23 | | | $ | 41.69 | | | $ | 21.66 | | | $ | 10.30 | | | $ | 37.64 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total (4) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Number of renewals/leases | | | 12 | | | | 9 | | | | 7 | | | | 6 | | | | 5 | |
Square feet | | | 161,203 | | | | 36,645 | | | | 45,946 | | | | 25,978 | | | | 112,928 | |
Tenant improvement costs per square foot (2) | | $ | 24.29 | | | $ | 31.36 | | | $ | 16.16 | | | $ | 8.72 | | | $ | 32.40 | |
Leasing commission costs per square foot (2) | | | 7.33 | | | | 3.22 | | | | 5.50 | | | | 1.10 | | | | 4.68 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total tenant improvement and leasing commission costs psf | | $ | 31.62 | | | $ | 34.58 | | | $ | 21.66 | | | $ | 9.82 | | | $ | 37.08 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Does not include retained tenants that have relocated to new space or expanded into new space. |
|
(2) | | Assumes all tenant improvements and leasing commissions are paid in the calendar year in which the lease commences, which may be different than the year in which they are actually paid. |
|
(3) | | Includes retained tenants that have relocated to new space or expanded into new space within our portfolio. |
|
(4) | | We have acquired several properties in the past which may make a period over period comparison difficult. For a list of acquisition dates, see page 18. |
23
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURE DEFINITIONS
JUNE 30, 2006
This document includes certain non-GAAP financial measures that management believes are helpful in understanding our business, as further described below. Our definition and calculation of non-GAAP financial measures may differ from those of other REITs, and may, therefore, not be comparable. The non-GAAP measures should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indicator of our performance and should be considered only a supplement to cash flows from operating, investing or financing activities as a measure of liquidity, computed in accordance with GAAP.
Funds from Operations (FFO)
We present funds from operations, or FFO, because we consider it an important supplemental measure of our operating performance and believe it is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of REITs, many of which present FFO when reporting their results. FFO is intended to exclude GAAP historical cost depreciation and amortization of real estate and related assets, which assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes ratably over time. Historically, however, real estate values have risen or fallen with market conditions. Because FFO excludes depreciation and amortization unique to real estate, gains and losses from property dispositions and extraordinary items, it provides a performance measure that, when compared year over year, reflects the impact to operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, development activities and interest costs, providing perspective not immediately apparent from net income. We compute FFO in accordance with standards established by the Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, in its March 1995 White Paper (as amended in November 1999 and April 2002). As defined by NAREIT, FFO represents net income (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of property, plus real estate related depreciation and amortization (excluding amortization of loan origination costs) and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Our computation may differ from the methodology for calculating FFO utilized by other equity REITs and, accordingly, may not be comparable to such other REITs. Further, FFO does not represent amounts available for management’s discretionary use because of needed capital replacement or expansion, debt service obligations, or other commitments and uncertainties. FFO should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) (computed in accordance with GAAP) as an indicator of our financial performance or to cash flow from operating activities (computed in accordance with GAAP) as an indicator of our liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to pay dividends or make distributions.
Adjusted Funds from Operations (AFFO)
We present adjusted funds from operations, or AFFO, as a supplemental operating measure because, when compared year over year, it assesses our ability to fund dividend and distribution requirements from our operating activities. We also believe that, as a widely recognized measure of the operations of REITs, AFFO will be used by investors as a basis to assess our ability to fund dividend payments in comparison to other REITs. We calculate AFFO by adding to FFO: (a) amounts received pursuant to master lease agreements on certain properties, which are not included in rental income for GAAP purposes, and (b) non-cash operating revenues and expenses. Other equity REITs may not calculate AFFO in a consistent manner. Accordingly, our AFFO may not be comparable to other equity REITs’ AFFO. AFFO should be considered only as a supplement to net income computed in accordance with GAAP as a measure of our operations.
Earnings before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA)
EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. Management uses EBITDA as an indicator of our ability to incur and service debt. In addition, we consider EBITDA to be an appropriate supplemental measure of our performance because it eliminates depreciation and interest, which permits investors to view income from operations without the impact of non-cash depreciation or the cost of debt. However, because EBITDA is calculated before recurring cash charges including interest expense and taxes, and is not adjusted for capital expenditures or other recurring cash requirements of our business, its utility is limited.
Coverage Ratios
We present interest and fixed charge ratios as supplemental liquidity measures. Management uses these ratios as indicators of our financial flexibility to service current interest expense and debt amortization from current cash net operating income. In addition, we believe that these coverage ratios represent common metrics used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties to evaluate our ability to service fixed cash payments. However, because these ratios are derived from EBITDA, their utility is limited by the same factors that limit the usefulness of EBITDA as a liquidity measure.
Net Operating Income (NOI)
We use net operating income, or NOI, as a performance measure and believe NOI provides useful information to investors regarding our financial condition and results of operations because it reflects only those income and expense items that are incurred at the property level. We compute NOI by adding or subtracting certain items from net income, minority interest in the operating partnership, gains/losses from investment in unconsolidated partnership, interest expense, interest income, depreciation and amortization, and general and administrative expenses. NOI presented by us may not be comparable to NOI reported by other REITs that define NOI differently. NOI should not be considered as an alternative to net income as an indication of our performance or to cash flows as a measure of liquidity or ability to make distributions.
24