Tower Group International (TWGP) DEF 14A Definitive proxy

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )

Filed by the Registrant  þ

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  o

Check the appropriate box:

o   Preliminary Proxy Statement

o   Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted byRule 14a-6(e)(2))

þ   Definitive Proxy Statement

o   Definitive Additional Materials

o   Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

Tower Group, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

þ   No fee required.

o   Fee computed on table below per Exchange ActRules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

(1)  Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)  Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)  Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange ActRule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)  Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)  Total fee paid:

o   Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o   Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange ActRule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1)  Amount Previously Paid:

(2)  Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)  Filing Party:

(4)  Date Filed:

TOWER GROUP, INC.

120 Broadway, 31st Floor

New York, New York 10271

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To the Holders of Our Common Stock:

The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Tower Group, Inc. (the “Company”) will be held on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 at 10:00 A.M. at the Millenium Hilton Hotel, 55 Church Street, New York, NY 10007 for the following purposes:

(1)	To elect two Directors;
(2)	To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year 2010; and
(3)	To consider such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

Stockholders of record at the close of business on March 16, 2010 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the meeting.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

Elliot S. Orol

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

March 18, 2010

TOWER GROUP, INC.

120 Broadway, 31st Floor

New York, New York 10271

PROXY STATEMENT

The accompanying proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors of Tower Group, Inc. (the “Company”), for use at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at the Millenium Hilton Hotel, 55 Church Street, New York, NY 10007 on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 at 10:00 A.M. This Proxy Statement, the foregoing Notice and the enclosed Proxy are being sent to stockholders of the Company on or about March 23, 2010.

Any proxy may be revoked at any time before it is voted by written notice mailed or delivered to the Secretary of the Company, by delivering a proxy bearing a later date or by attending the meeting and voting in person. If your proxy card is signed and returned without specifying a vote or an abstention on any proposal, it will be voted in accordance with the recommendation of the Board of Directors on each proposal.

The proxy materials are available over the Internet at the web site address shown on your proxy card.Internet voting is available 24 hours a day. If you have access to the Internet, we encourage you to vote this way. If you vote over the Internet, please do not return your proxy card. Stockholders can elect to view future proxy statements and annual reports over the Internet instead of receiving paper copies in the mail. You can choose this option and save the Company the cost of producing and mailing the documents by following the instructions provided if you vote over the Internet. Should you choose to view future proxy statements and annual reports over the Internet, you will receive ane-mail next year with voting instructions and the Internet address of those materials.

The Board of Directors knows of no other matters that are likely to be brought before the meeting other than those specified in the notice thereof. If any other matters properly come before the meeting, however, the persons named in the enclosed proxy, or their duly constituted substitutes acting at the meeting, will be authorized to vote or otherwise act thereon in accordance with their judgment on such matters. If the enclosed proxy is properly executed and returned prior to voting at the meeting, the shares represented thereby will be voted in accordance with the instructions marked thereon. In the absence of instructions, executed proxies will be voted “FOR” the two nominees for the Board of Directors, and “FOR” the ratification of the appointment by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year 2010. Directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast. Ratification of the appointment of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm requires the affirmative vote of the majority of the shares present (whether in person or by proxy) that are entitled to vote.

Stockholders of record at the close of business on March 16, 2010 are entitled to vote at the meeting. On March 16, 2010, the Company had outstanding 45,314,254 shares of common stock, $.01 par value per share. Each outstanding share of common stock is entitled to one vote and there is no cumulative voting. As to each proposal, the presence, in person or by proxy, of stockholders entitled to cast at least a majority of the votes that all stockholders are entitled to cast on the particular matter shall constitute a quorum for the purpose of considering that matter. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted only for the purpose of determining whether a quorum is present.A copy of the Company’s Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2009 is being mailed simultaneously herewith and is electronically available to stockholders on the Internet by logging on towww.proxyvote.com and following the instructions provided.

1

Table of Contents

	Page
Proxy Statement	1
Election of Directors	3
Corporate Governance	4
Management — Directors and Executive Officers	11
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management	17
Compensation Discussion and Analysis	18
Compensation Committee Report	27
Summary Compensation Table	28
All Other Compensation Table	28
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2009	29
Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2009	33
Equity Compensation Plan Information	34
Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2009	34
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for 2009	35
Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment Or Change in Control	35
Director Compensation for 2009	38
Audit Committee Report	39
Pre-Approval Policy for Services of Independent Registered Public Accountant	40
Independent Registered Public Accountant’s Fees	40
Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	41
Stockholder Proposals	41

2

Cost of Solicitation

The Company is soliciting proxies on its own behalf and will bear the expenses of printing and mailing this proxy statement. The Company will also request persons, firms and corporations holding shares in their own names, or in the names of their nominees, which shares are beneficially owned by others, to send this proxy material to and obtain proxies from such beneficial owners and will reimburse such holders for their reasonable expenses in so doing.

1.   ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Board of Directors has nominated the two persons named below to hold office until their successors have been duly elected and qualified. The Company believes that each nominee named below will be able to serve. However, should any such nominee not be able to serve as a Director, the persons named in the proxies have advised the Company that they will vote for the election of such substitute nominee as the Board of Directors may propose.

Nominees for Director

Directors hold office in accordance with the by-laws of the Company, which provide for Class I, II and III Directors. The Directors in each class serve three-year terms, with the expiration of terms staggered according to class. Officers are elected by and serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors. The following Directors have terms that expire at the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and have been nominated to stand for election as Class I Directors with terms expiring in 2013:

Name	Age		Position
Charles A. Bryan		63	Director
Robert S. Smith		51	Director

Francis M. Colalucci, whose term as Director also expires at the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, is retiring from the Board of Directors as of the date of the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and accordingly is not standing for reelection.

The names of the nominees, their principal occupation, length of service as Directors of the Company and certain other biographical information are set forth below:

Charles A. Bryan, C.P.A., F.C.A.S., C.P.C.U.

Director

Mr. Bryan, a Director since 2004, has been the President of CAB Consulting, LLC, an insurance consulting firm that provides general management, merger and acquisition, actuarial and accounting services, since 2001. From 1998 to 2000, Mr. Bryan served as Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary for Nationwide Insurance Group. Mr. Bryan is a Fellow of the Casualty Actuarial Society, a Certified Public Accountant, and a Chartered Property and Casualty Underwriter. Mr. Bryan also serves on the Board of Directors of Safe Auto, Medical Mutual of Ohio, the Ohio Bureau of Workers Compensation and Munich Re America (statutory company only) and its U.S. affiliates (statutory companies only). Mr. Bryan received an M.B.A. in General Management from Golden Gate University in 1976, an M.S. in Mathematics from Purdue University in 1969 and a B.S. in Mathematics from John Carroll University in 1968.

The Board of Directors believes that Mr. Bryan possesses the experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills necessary to serve on the Board because of his more than 35 years of relevant actuarial, accounting, and insurance industry-related experience, his years of service on various insurance-related boards of directors, and his extensive knowledge of the Company and its business. In addition, he has a

3

number of relevant professional designations, such as CPA, FCAS, and CPCU, which indicate his knowledge of insurance, actuarial, and accounting issues.

Robert S. Smith

Director

Mr. Smith became a Director in February 2009 upon the completion of the merger of CastlePoint Holdings, Ltd. into the Company. Prior to joining Tower’s Board of Directors, Mr. Smith served as a member of CastlePoint’s Board of Directors from January 2006 until February 2009. Mr. Smith is currently a principal of Sherier Capital LLC, a business advisory firm that he founded in 2005, and a Managing Director of National Capital Merchant Banking, LLC, an investment firm that he joined in April 2008. He was previously Chief Operating Officer (from December 1999 to April 2004) and Executive Vice-President (from April 2004 to August 2004) of Friedman, Billings, Ramsey Group, Inc., where he was instrumental, among other things, in growing Friedman, Billings, Ramsey Group, Inc. from a privately-held securities boutique to a nationally recognized investment bank, helping accomplish its 1997 initial public offering, the creation of an affiliated public company, FBR Asset Investment Corporation, and the merger of the two companies in 2003. Before joining Friedman, Billings, Ramsey Group, Inc. as its General Counsel, Mr. Smith was an attorney with the law firm of McGuireWoods LLP from 1986 to 1996. Mr. Smith received his LL.B. and Dip L.P. (graduate Diploma in Legal Practice) from Edinburgh University, and his LL.M. from the University of Virginia.

The Board of Directors believes that Mr. Smith possesses the experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills necessary to serve on the Board because of his more than 20 years of relevant experience including investment experience, service as a senior executive of a public company, experience in the public securities markets, and his corporate legal background.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Director Independence

The Board of Directors applies the standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market (“NASDAQ”) in determining whether a Director is “independent.” The NASDAQ rules generally provide that no Director or nominee for Director qualifies as “independent” unless the Board of Directors affirmatively determines that such person has no relationship with the Company that, in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a Director. Specifically, the following persons may not be considered independent: (i) a Director or nominee for Director who is, or at any time during the past three years was, employed by the Company or by any subsidiary of the Company; (ii) a Director or nominee for Director who accepts, or has a family member who accepts, any payments from the Company or any subsidiary of the Company in excess of $120,000 during any period of twelve consecutive months within any of the past three fiscal years preceding the determination of independence other than (1) compensation for Board or Board Committee service, (2) compensation paid to a family member who is a non-executive employee of the Company or a subsidiary of the Company or (3) benefits under a tax-qualified retirement plan, or non-discretionary compensation; (iii) a Director or nominee for Director who has a family member who is, or at any time during the past three years was, employed by the Company or any subsidiary of the Company as an executive officer; (iv) a Director or nominee for Director who is, or has a family member who is, a partner in, or a controlling stockholder or an executive officer of, any organization to which the Company made, or from which the Company received, payments for property or services in the current or any of the past three fiscal years that exceeded 5% of the recipient’s consolidated gross revenues for that year or $200,000, whichever is more, other than (1) payments arising solely from investments in the Company’s securities or (2) payments under non-discretionary charitable contribution matching programs; (v) a Director or nominee for Director

4

who is, or has a family member who is, employed as an executive officer of another entity at any time during the past three years where any of the executive officers of the Company serves on the compensation committee of such other entity; and (vi) a Director or nominee for Director who is, or has a family member who is, a current partner of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, or was a partner or employee of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, who worked on the Company’s audit at any time during the past three years.

The Board of Directors, in applying the above-referenced standards, has affirmatively determined that each of the following individuals is an “independent” Director of the Company: Charles A. Bryan, William W. Fox, Jr., William A. Robbie, Steven W. Schuster, Robert S. Smith, Jan R. Van Gorder and Austin P. Young, III. As part of the Board’s process in making such determination, each such Director provided confirmation that (a) all of the above-cited objective criteria for independence are satisfied and (b) each such Director has no other relationship with the Company that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a Director.

In 2006, the Board of Directors approved a policy providing that independent directors shall not accept directly or indirectly any consulting, legal, advisory, or other compensatory fee from the Company or any of its subsidiaries, other than fees paid to any such director in his or her capacity as a member of the Board and its Committees.

In October 2008, the Board of Directors approved a policy providing that any director who changes his or her principal employment submit a letter of resignation to the Board, which shall determine in its discretion whether or not to accept such resignation.

In February 2009, the Board of Directors approved director stock ownership guidelines requiring each of the Company’s independent directors to own, within five years from the later of April 1, 2009 or the date on which such director joins the Board, common stock of the Company having a minimum market value equal to three times the base annual cash retainer paid to the directors.

Independent Directors

The Company’s Board of Directors has determined that seven of its nine members, constituting more than a majority, meet NASDAQ’s standards for independence. See “Director Independence” above. The Company’s independent Directors will meet in executive session at least twice during 2010.

Audit Committee

The Company’s Board of Directors has determined that all members of the Audit Committee meet the standards of independence required of Audit Committee members by applicable NASDAQ and United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC” or the “Commission”) rules and regulations. See “Director Independence” above.

The Board of Directors has determined that: (i) none of the members of the Audit Committee has participated in the preparation of the financial statements of the Company or any current subsidiary of the Company at any time during the past three years; (ii) all of the members of the Audit Committee are able to read and understand fundamental financial statements, including a company’s balance sheet, income statement and cash flow statement; and (iii) Austin P. Young, III, who previously served as an audit partner in the Houston and New York offices of KPMG Peat Marwick until 1986, is an Audit Committee financial expert. In making this last determination, the Board of Directors made a qualitative assessment of Mr. Young’s level of knowledge and experience based on a number of factors, including his formal education, past employment experience in accounting and professional certification in accounting.

5

The Audit Committee operates under a formal written charter adopted by the Board of Directors that governs its duties and conduct. The charter is reviewed annually for appropriate revisions. Copies of the charter can be obtained free of charge on the Company’s web site,www.twrgrp.com, or by contacting the Company’s Secretary at the address appearing on the first page of this proxy statement.

The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm reports directly to the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee meets with management and the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm before the filing of officers’ certifications with the SEC to receive information concerning, among other things, any significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee has also established procedures to enable confidential and anonymous reporting to the Audit Committee of concerns regarding accounting or auditing matters. The Company conducts an appropriate review of all related party transactions for potential conflict of interest situations on an ongoing basis, and all such transactions must be approved by the Audit Committee.

Compensation Committee

All members of the Compensation Committee have been determined to meet NASDAQ’s standards for independence. See “Director Independence” above. Further, each member is a “non-employee Director,” as defined underRule 16b-3(b)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and an “outside Director” as defined in Treasury RegulationsSection 1.162-27, promulgated under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). The Compensation Committee operates under a formal written charter adopted by the Board of Directors that governs its duties and conduct. The charter is reviewed annually for appropriate revisions. Copies of the charter can be obtained free of charge on the Company’s web site,www.twrgrp.com, or by contacting the Company’s Secretary at the address appearing on the first page of this proxy statement.

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

All members of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee have been determined to meet NASDAQ’s standards for independence. See “Director Independence” above. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee operates under a formal written charter that governs its duties and standards of performance. The charter is reviewed annually for appropriate revisions. Copies of the charter can be obtained free of charge on the Company’s web site,www.twrgrp.com, or by contacting the Company’s Secretary at the address appearing on the first page of this proxy statement.

As part of its duties, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee develops and recommends to the Board of Directors corporate governance principles. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee also identifies and recommends individuals for Board of Directors membership. To be considered for membership on the Board of Directors, a candidate should meet the following criteria, at a minimum: a solid education, extensive business, professional or academic experience, and the requisite reputation, character, skills and judgment, which, in the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee’s view, have prepared him or her for dealing with the multifaceted financial, business and other issues that confront a Board of Directors of a corporation with the size, complexity, reputation and success of the Company.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee does not have a formal diversity policy with respect to the identification and recommendation of individuals for Board of Directors membership. However, in carrying out this responsibility, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee values differences in professional experience, educational background, viewpoint and other individual qualities and attributes that facilitate and enhance the oversight by the Board of Directors of the business and affairs of the Company.

6

In connection with each of the Company’s annual meetings of stockholders, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will consider candidates for Director recommended by any stockholder who (a) has been a continuous record owner of at least 2% of the Company’s common stock for at least one year prior to submission and (b) provides a written statement that the holder intends to continue ownership of the shares through the stockholders meeting. Such recommendations must be made by written notice addressed to the Secretary of the Company no more than 120 days and no less than 90 days prior to the anniversary of the date the Company first mailed its proxy materials for the previous year’s annual meeting of stockholders. Consequently, any such recommendation for consideration by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee with respect to the Company’s 2011 annual meeting of stockholders must be made no earlier than November 23, 2010 and no later than December 23, 2010.

Pursuant to the above procedures, once the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has identified prospective nominees, background information will be solicited on the candidates, following which they will be investigated, interviewed and evaluated by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, which will then report to the Board of Directors. No distinctions will be made as between internally-recommended candidates and those recommended by stockholders.

All the Director nominees named in this proxy statement met the Board of Directors’ criteria for membership and were recommended by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee for election by stockholders at this Annual Meeting.

All nominees for election at this Annual Meeting are current members of the Board standing for re-election.

Investment Committee

All members of the Investment Committee have been determined to meet NASDAQ’s standards for independence. See “Director Independence” above. The Investment Committee monitors the performance of the Company’s investment portfolio and evaluates the Company’s individual investment portfolio managers on a regular basis. The Investment Committee operates under a formal written charter adopted by the Board of Directors that governs its duties and conduct. The charter is reviewed annually for appropriate revisions. Copies of the charter can be obtained free of charge on the Company’s web site,www.twrgrp.com, or by contacting the Company’s Secretary at the address appearing on the first page of this proxy statement.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

The Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that includes provisions ranging from restrictions on gifts to conflicts of interest, portions of which Code are intended to meet the definition of a “code of ethics” under applicable SEC rules. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is applicable to all Directors, officers and employees, including the principal executive officer, principal financial officer and persons performing similar functions. Copies of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics can be obtained free of charge from the Company’s web site,www.twrgrp.com, or by contacting the Company’s Secretary at the address appearing on the first page of this proxy statement.

Communications with the Board of Directors

A stockholder who wishes to communicate with the Board of Directors, or specific individual Directors, may do so by directing a written request addressed to such Directors to the attention of the Company’s Secretary at the address appearing on the first page of this proxy statement. All

7

communications directed to members of the Board of Directors will be forwarded to the intended Director(s).

Additional Information Regarding the Board

Board Leadership Structure.The Board of Directors has not separated the positions of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Both positions are held by Mr. Lee. The Board does not have a lead director. The Board believes that this structure has historically served the Company well and continues to do so, by facilitating communication between the Board and senior management of the Company as well as Board oversight of the Company’s business and affairs.

Board Role in Risk Oversight.The Board of Directors plays a significant role in providing oversight of the Company’s management of risk. Senior management has responsibility for the management of risk and reports to the Board regularly with respect to its ongoing enterprise risk management efforts. Because responsibility for the oversight of elements of the Company’s enterprise risk management extends to various committees of the Board, the Board has determined that it, rather than any one of its committees, should retain the primary oversight role for risk management. In exercising its oversight of risk management, the Board has delegated to the Audit Committee primary responsibility for the oversight of risk related to the Company’s financial statements and processes, and has determined that the Company’s internal audit function should report directly to the Audit Committee. The Board has delegated to the Compensation Committee primary responsibility for the oversight of risk related to the Company’s compensation policies and practices. The Board has delegated to the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee primary responsibility for the oversight of risk related to the Company’s corporate governance practices. The Board has delegated to the Investment Committee primary responsibility for the oversight of risk related to the Company’s investments. Each committee reports regularly to the Board with respect to such committee’s particular risk oversight responsibilities.

Meetings.During 2009, the Board of Directors met 13 times. The Board’s standing independent committees consist of the Audit, Compensation, Corporate Governance and Nominating, and Investment Committees. In 2009, each Director attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors and any committees on which such Director served. All Directors were present at the annual meeting of stockholders.

Board Committees.The Audit Committee met 15 times in 2009. During 2009, the Audit Committee consisted of Messrs. Young (Chair), Bryan, Fox and Robbie. Among other duties, the Audit Committee selects the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm; reviews and recommends action by the Board of Directors regarding the Company’s quarterly and annual reports filed with the SEC; discusses the Company’s audited financial statements with management and the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm; and reviews the scope and results of the independent audit and any internal audit.

The Compensation Committee met 10 times in 2009. During 2009, the Compensation Committee consisted of Messrs. Bryan (Chair), Schuster, Smith and Van Gorder. Among other duties, the Compensation Committee evaluates the performance of the Company’s principal officers, recommends to the Board of Directors the selection and compensation of principal officers and administers the Company’s various compensation plans.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee met five times in 2009. During 2009, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee consisted of Messrs. Schuster (Chair), Bryan, Fox and Van Gorder. Among other duties, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for recommending to the Board of Directors candidates for nomination to the Board.

8

The Investment Committee, which was established in February 2009, met five times in 2009. During 2009, the Investment Committee consisted of Messrs. Smith (Chair), Robbie, Schuster and Young. Among other duties, the Investment Committee monitors the performance of the Company’s investment portfolio.

While the Company has not adopted a formal policy with regard to attendance by members of the Board of Directors at annual stockholder meetings, it encourages all Directors to attend the Annual Meeting.

Pursuant to the Company’s by-laws, in March 2010 the Board of Directors approved a resolution to reduce its size from nine to eight directors, effective upon the retirement of Mr. Colalucci from the Board as of the Company’s 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

No member of the Compensation Committee is or has ever been an officer or employee of the Company or of any of its subsidiaries or affiliates. None of the Company’s executive officers served as a director or member of the compensation committee (or other board committee performing similar functions) of any entity of which a member of the Company’s Compensation Committee was an executive officer, nor did any of the Company’s executive officers serve as a member of the compensation committee (or other board committee performing similar functions or, in the absence of such a committee, the entire board of directors) of any entity for which any of the Company’s Directors served as an executive officer.

The Board and Board Committees

The following table shows each of the four current standing committees established by the Board and the members and chairman of each committee:

			Corporate
			Governance and
		Compensation	Nominating	Investment
Name	Audit Committee	Committee	Committee	Committee
Charles A. Bryan*	X	CHAIR	X
Francis M. Colalucci(1)
William W. Fox, Jr.*	X		X
Michael H. Lee
William A. Robbie*	X			X
Steven W. Schuster*		X	CHAIR	X
Robert S. Smith*		X		CHAIR
Jan R. Van Gorder*		X	X
Austin P. Young, III*	CHAIR			X
Number of meetings in 2009	15	10	5	5

*	Independent Director
(1)	Mr. Colalucci is retiring from the Board of Directors as of the Company’s 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

9

Transactions with Related Persons

Michael H. Lee, the Company’s Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, was also the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of CastlePoint Holdings, Ltd. (“CastlePoint”), a Bermuda-based insurance and reinsurance holding company that the Company sponsored in 2006, until the merger of CastlePoint into a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company on February 5, 2009. Mr. Lee owned 644,138 shares of common stock of CastlePoint, representing 1.7% of the outstanding shares of CastlePoint, at the time of the merger. Mr. Lee also had been granted a total of 1,122,498 vested and unvested options to acquire shares of stock of CastlePoint.

As part of the sponsorship and capitalization of CastlePoint, the Company invested $15 million and received 2,555,000 common shares of CastlePoint. At the time of CastlePoint’s capitalization in April 2006, the Company also received warrants to purchase additional common shares of CastlePoint. The Company did not exercise these warrants and they expired when the companies were merged in 2009.

The Company had a strategic relationship with CastlePoint, pursuant to which the Company’s subsidiaries entered into a master agreement and a number of reinsurance, service and expense sharing and management agreements with CastlePoint and its subsidiaries. The master agreement ceased to be in effect as of the closing of the merger of the companies on February 5, 2009. The other agreements were terminated, modified or simplified in connection with the closing of the merger.

Board of Directors Related Party Policies

In 2006, the Board of Directors approved a policy providing that independent directors shall not accept directly or indirectly any consulting, legal, advisory, or other compensatory fee from the Company or any of its subsidiaries, other than fees paid to any such director in his or her capacity as a member of the Board and its Committees.

In 2007, the Board of Directors adopted a written policy that calls for the prior review and approval by the Audit Committee of any proposed transaction (or series of transactions) between the Company and any related party, other than transactions involving a total amount less than $50,000. Under the policy, full disclosure of all facts and circumstances relating to the proposed transaction must be made to the Audit Committee, which may only approve transactions that are in, or are not inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. Related parties are defined as executive officers, 5% stockholders, directors, director nominees and any of their immediate family members (as those terms are defined under Item 404 ofRegulation S-K).

10

MANAGEMENT — DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The table below sets forth the names, ages and positions of the Company’s Directors and executive officers.

Name	Age		Position
Michael H. Lee(3)		52	Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
Francis M. Colalucci(1)(4)		65	Senior Vice President and Director
Charles A. Bryan(1)		63	Director
William W. Fox, Jr.(3)		68	Director
William A. Robbie(3)		58	Director
Steven W. Schuster(3)		55	Director
Robert S. Smith(1)		51	Director
Jan R. Van Gorder(2)		62	Director
Austin P. Young, III(2)		69	Director
Salvatore V. Abano		46	Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer
William E. Hitselberger		52	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Gary S. Maier		45	Senior Vice President and Chief Underwriting Officer
Elliot S. Orol		54	Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Christian K. Pechmann		60	Senior Vice President, Marketing & Distribution
Laurie A. Ranegar		48	Senior Vice President, Operations
Courtney C. Smith		62	Senior Vice President, Specialty Business
Joel S. Weiner		60	Senior Vice President, Chief Actuary and Strategic Planning

(1)	Denotes Class I Director with term to expire in 2010.
(2)	Denotes Class II Director with term to expire in 2012.
(3)	Denotes Class III Director with term to expire in 2011.
(4)	Mr. Colalucci is retiring from the Board of Directors as of the Company’s 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Set forth below is certain biographical information for each of the Company’s Directors and executive officers (other than Messrs. Bryan and Smith, for whom such information is provided above under “Election of Directors — Nominees for Director”):

Michael H. Lee

Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer

Mr. Lee currently serves as Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer and has held these positions at the Company since its formation in 1995 and at its subsidiaries since their formation. Before founding the Company’s first insurance subsidiary, Tower Insurance Company of New York, in 1990, Mr. Lee was an attorney in private practice specializing in advising entrepreneurs on the acquisition, sale and formation of businesses in various industries. Mr. Lee received a B.A. in Economics from Rutgers University in 1980 and a J.D. from Boston College Law School in 1983. He is admitted to practice law in New York and New Jersey. Mr. Lee has worked in the insurance industry for over 20 years with experience in insurance, finance, underwriting, sales and marketing, claims management and administration and law. Mr. Lee also served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of CastlePoint Holdings, Ltd. from its formation in 2006 until its merger into the Company in February 2009.

The Board of Directors believes that Mr. Lee possesses the experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills necessary to serve on the Board because of his more than 20 years of experience in all aspects of

11

insurance, finance, mergers and acquisitions and the formation of various businesses, his having provided leadership and strategic direction to the Company as its founder, Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer since 1995, and his unparalleled knowledge of the Company and its business.

Francis M. Colalucci, C.P.A.

Senior Vice President and Director

Mr. Colalucci joined the Company in February 2002 as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. He has been a Director of the Company since March 2002. From 1996 until 2001, Mr. Colalucci was employed by the Empire Insurance Company, a property and casualty insurance company, and ultimately served as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer in addition to being a member of that company’s Board of Directors. From 1974 to 1996, Mr. Colalucci held various senior financial positions at The Continental Corporation and subsidiaries, the Continental Insurance Companies, including Controller and Corporate Treasurer. From 1966 to 1974, Mr. Colalucci was employed by Deloitte & Touche, CPAs. Mr. Colalucci received a B.B.A. in Accounting from St. John’s University in 1966 and is a New York State licensed Certified Public Accountant and a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the New York State Society of Certified Public Accountants and Financial Executives International.

The Board of Directors believes that Mr. Colalucci possesses the experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills necessary to serve on the Board because of his more than 40 years of relevant accounting and financial experience, more than 30 years of insurance industry-related experience, and, as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer for eight years until March 2010, extensive knowledge of the Company and its business.

William W. Fox, Jr.

Director

Mr. Fox, who became a Director in April 2006, has over 40 years experience in the insurance and reinsurance industry. Mr. Fox was employed by Balis & Co., Inc. and its successor, the Guy Carpenter reinsurance brokerage division of Marsh & McLennan Companies, from 1962 through 1988, and again from 1992 through 1999. Mr. Fox had a number of positions at Balis & Co., Inc., and Guy Carpenter, including President of Balis from 1985 through 1988 and again from 1992 through 1999. Mr. Fox also served as a member of Guy Carpenter’s Executive Committee and Board of Directors, and as a Managing Director of J&H, Marsh & McLennan. Between 1992 and 1999, Mr. Fox was also the Chief Executive Officer of Excess Reinsurance Company. In 1988, Mr. Fox founded PW Reinsurance Management Company (“PW Group”), as a joint venture with Providence Washington Insurance Company (“Providence”) to underwrite reinsurance on behalf of Providence. Mr. Fox was a Senior Vice President of Providence from 1988 to 1989 and was responsible for selecting and overseeing reinsurance intermediaries. In 1989, the Baloise Insurance Group acquired Providence and appointed Mr. Fox President of the PW Group. Mr. Fox has served on several insurance-related boards of directors and is currently the Chairman of the Board of MII Management Group, theAttorney-in-Fact for MutualAid Exchange. Mr. Fox is a member of the CPCU Society and holds a Pennsylvania Property and Casualty License.

The Board of Directors believes that Mr. Fox possesses the experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills necessary to serve on the Board because of his more than 40 years of relevant industry-related experience in the fields of insurance and reinsurance, his years of service on various insurance-related boards of directors, and his extensive knowledge of the Company and its business.

12

William A. Robbie, C.P.A.

Director

Mr. Robbie became a Director in February 2009 upon the completion of the merger of CastlePoint Holdings, Ltd. into the Company. Prior to joining the Company’s Board of Directors, he served as a member of CastlePoint’s Board of Directors and chairman of its Audit Committee from January 2006 until February 2009. From 2004 through 2009, he provided financial and corporate governance advisory services to the insurance industry through his own consulting firm. Mr. Robbie was Chief Financial Officer of Platinum Underwriters Reinsurance Ltd., a property and casualty reinsurance company in Bermuda, from 2002 to 2004 with responsibility for that company’s finance, claims and IT functions. He was the lead financial team member in the initial public offering of Platinum Underwriters Reinsurance Ltd., which became a separate public company from St. Paul Reinsurance, Inc. where he held the same position from August 2002 to November 2002. From 1997 to 2002, Mr. Robbie held various positions at XL Capital Ltd., a Bermuda-based insurance, reinsurance and financial risk company, and its subsidiaries, including Executive Vice President of Global Services, Senior Vice President and Corporate Treasurer, and Chief Financial and Administrative Officer of XL Re, Ltd., with responsibility for that company’s finance, claims, IT, human resources, business processing and administration functions. Prior to that, he held a variety of senior positions in the insurance industry, including roles as Chief Financial Officer of Prudential AARP Operations, Chief Accounting Officer at Continental Insurance Companies, Treasurer of Monarch Life Insurance Company and various positions at Aetna Life and Casualty Company. From 2005 to 2008, Mr. Robbie was a director and chairman of the Audit Committee of American Safety Insurance Company, Ltd. Mr. Robbie is a Certified Public Accountant. Mr. Robbie received his B.A. from St. Michael’s College and his Master of Accounting and M.B.A. from Northeastern University.

The Board of Directors believes that Mr. Robbie possesses the experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills necessary to serve on the Board because of his more than 30 years of relevant industry-related experience in finance, including serving as Chief Financial Officer of insurance and reinsurance companies, and his extensive background in accounting and business administration.

Steven W. Schuster

Director

Mr. Schuster has served on the Board of Directors of the Company since 1997. Mr. Schuster has been engaged in the practice of corporate law for over 25 years and is co-chair of McLaughlin & Stern LLP’s corporate and securities department, where he has been a partner since 1995. Mr. Schuster received his B.A. from Harvard University in 1976 and his J.D. from New York University in 1980.

The Board of Directors believes that Mr. Schuster possesses the experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills necessary to serve on the Board because of his more than 25 years of relevant corporate and securities legal and transactional experience and his extensive knowledge of the Company and its business.

Jan R. Van Gorder

Director

Mr. Van Gorder became a Director in February 2009, upon the completion of the merger of CastlePoint Holdings, Ltd. into the Company. Prior to joining the Company’s Board of Directors, he served as a member of CastlePoint’s Board of Directors from March 2007 until February 2009. Mr. Van Gorder was employed by Erie Insurance Group from November 1981 through December 2006. He held a variety of positions at that company, including Acting Chief Executive Officer from January 2002 to May 2002 and his most recent position as Senior Executive Vice-President, Secretary and General Counsel from December 1990 through December 2006. He served as a consultant and acting Secretary and General Counsel at Erie Insurance Group during the period January 1, 2007 through May 12, 2007. Mr. Van Gorder served as a member of the board of directors of Erie Indemnity Company, Erie,

13

Pennsylvania, from 1990 to 2004. Mr. Van Gorder has also served as a Director and Chairman of the Insurance Federation of Pennsylvania. Mr. Van Gorder received a B.A in International Relations from the University of Pennsylvania in 1970 and a J.D. from Temple University School of Law in 1975.

The Board of Directors believes that Mr. Van Gorder possesses the experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills necessary to serve on the Board because of his more than 25 years of relevant insurance industry-related legal and business experience, including serving as General Counsel of a public insurance company, and his years of service on various insurance-related boards of directors.

Austin P. Young, III, C.P.A.

Director

Mr. Young, a Director since 2004, currently serves as a Director and the Chairman of the Audit Committee of Administaff, Inc. and Amerisafe, Inc. Previously, he served as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of CellStar Corporation from 1999 to December 2001, when he retired. Before joining CellStar Corporation, he served as Executive Vice President — Finance and Administration of Metamor Worldwide, Inc. from 1996 to 1999. Mr. Young also held the position of Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of American General Corporation for over eight years. He was a partner in the Houston and New York offices of KPMG Peat Marwick where his career spanned 22 years before joining American General Corporation. He holds an accounting degree from the University of Texas and is a Texas and New York State licensed Certified Public Accountant. He is also a member of the Houston and State Chapters of the Texas Society of Certified Public Accountants, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and Financial Executives International.

The Board of Directors believes that Mr. Young possesses the experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills necessary to serve on the Board because of his more than 45 years of relevant experience in the financial and accounting fields, his years of service on various boards of directors and audit committees, and his extensive knowledge of the Company and its business.

Salvatore V. Abano

Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer

Mr. Abano joined the Company in June 2008 as Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer. From 2006 to 2008, he served as Vice President of Technology, Systems Development and Infrastructure for QBE the Americas. From 2004 to 2006, Mr. Abano was the Chief Technology Officer in the United States Army, under Operation Iraqi Freedom III, for the central region of Iraq. He was awarded the Bronze Star, Combat Action Badge, and other prestigious awards during his military reserves deployment. Mr. Abano is now a retired Lieutenant Colonel from the military reserves with 26 years of service. Prior to his overseas deployment, Mr. Abano held the position of Vice President and CIO for Kemper Insurance Companies Northeast Region from1999-2004, and was Assistant Vice President of Technology and Strategic Software Development for Munich Re America (formerly American Reinsurance Corporation) from1993-1999. Mr. Abano has held various positions within the insurance and financial services industry, including with American International Group. He currently serves as Secretary for the New Jersey Chapter of the Society for Senior Information Managers, and was elected in 2006 to the Board of Education within his local community. Mr. Abano received an M.B.A. in Business Management and Technology from Regis University in 2003, and is a graduate of Brooklyn College, The City University of New York, where he received a B.S. in Computer and Information Science in 1986.

14

William E. Hitselberger

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Mr. Hitselberger joined the Company in December 2009 as Senior Vice President and became Chief Financial Officer in March 2010. Before joining the Company, Mr. Hitselberger served as Executive Vice President of PMA Capital Corporation from April 2004 to November 2009 and as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer from June 2002 to March 2004. He also served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of The PMA Insurance Group from 1998 to June 2002 and as Vice President of The PMA Insurance Group from 1996 to 1998. Mr. Hitselberger is a Certified Public Accountant and a Chartered Financial Analyst.

Gary S. Maier

Senior Vice President and Chief Underwriting Officer

Mr. Maier joined the Company in June 2005. Before joining the Company, Mr. Maier served from April 2002 to September 2004 as Senior Vice President and Chief Underwriting Officer of OneBeacon Insurance Group in New York. In his role at OneBeacon Insurance Group, Mr. Maier managed the New York and New Jersey territories. From February 1987 to March 2002, Mr. Maier served in a variety of positions at Chubb Insurance Group, including most recently as Senior Vice President and Chief Underwriting Officer of Commercial Lines for Chubb Insurance Group’s Mid-Atlantic Region, in which he managed a $400 million middle-market commercial portfolio in seven states with six field offices and a regional small commercial underwriting center.

Elliot S. Orol

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

Mr. Orol joined the Company in December 2008 as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. Before joining the Company, Mr. Orol served until November 2008 at The Navigators Group, Inc. as Chief Compliance Officer from November 2004, Senior Vice President and General Counsel from May 2005, and Secretary from May 2006. Prior to joining Navigators, Mr. Orol was in private legal practice and, from 2002 to 2003, served as Managing Director and General Counsel of Gerling Global Financial Products, Inc. From 1999 through 2001, he was a partner with the law firm of Cozen O’Connor. He served from1996-1999 as Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of the GRE Insurance Group, and from1987-1996 as Vice President of The Continental Insurance Company. He currently serves on the Board of Trustees of The Dalton School. Mr. Orol received a B.S. in Mathematics from the State University of New York at Binghamton, a J.D. from the University of Chicago Law School and an M.B.A. from the University of Chicago Graduate School of Business.

Christian K. Pechmann

Senior Vice President, Marketing & Distribution

Mr. Pechmann joined the Company in September 2003. Before that, Mr. Pechmann was employed in various roles at Kemper Insurance Companies for 32 years. His most recent position with that company was as Northeast Region President, responsible for management and profitability of seven operating branch offices. A 1971 graduate of Hartwick College, Mr. Pechmann received a B.A. in English.

Laurie A. Ranegar

Senior Vice President, Operations

Ms. Ranegar joined the Company in October 2003 as Vice President of Operations. She was promoted to Senior Vice President in January 2006. She currently manages underwriting operations, with responsibility for policy issuance service, billing and collections, premium audit and statistical reporting. She has over 25 years of insurance industry experience. Her most recent prior experience was with Kemper Insurance where she was Regional Operations Director, responsible for underwriting operations

15

in seven branch offices located throughout the northeast from 2002 until 2003. Before Kemper, Ms. Ranegar held management positions at Highlands Insurance Group, Inc. from 1996 until 2002, where she was Vice President, Claim Field Operations, responsible for technical claim handling and operations in the field claim offices, and Vice President, Underwriting and Operations, responsible for a small business service center. She began her insurance career with Aetna Life and Casualty as a Liability Claim Representative in New York City. At Aetna, and subsequently Travelers, she held positions of increasing responsibility including Assistant Director responsible for the consolidation of Aetna and Travelers claim field offices. Ms. Ranegar graduated from the University of Pittsburgh with a B.A. in Economics.

Courtney C. Smith

Senior Vice President, Specialty Business

Mr. Smith became Senior Vice President, Specialty Business, of the Company in November 2009 upon the completion of the acquisition of Specialty Underwriters’ Alliance, Inc. by the Company. Prior to joining the Company, he served as President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Specialty Underwriters’ Alliance, Inc. from its inception in April 2003 and as Chairman of its board from May 2004. Mr. Smith has over 30 years of experience in the property and casualty insurance industry. From April 1999 to April 2002, Mr. Smith served as Chief Executive Officer and President of TIG Specialty Insurance, a leading specialty insurance underwriter. From January 1993 to March 1999, Mr. Smith was Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of Coregis Group, Inc., an insurer specializing in program business consolidated from the various Crum & Forster companies. Prior thereto, he served in various executive positions at Industrial Indemnity, American International Group, and Hartford Insurance Group. Mr. Smith is a member of the Society of Chartered Property and Casualty Underwriters, served on the advisory board of Illinois State University’s Katie Insurance School, was a member of the Board of Directors of the Alliance of American Insurers and was a trustee of American Institute of CPCU/Insurance Institute of America.

Joel S. Weiner

Senior Vice President, Chief Actuary and Strategic Planning

Mr. Weiner joined the Company in February 2009, following the merger of CastlePoint Holdings, Ltd. into the Company. He joined CastlePoint as Vice President in January 2006, was a director from January 2007 through March 2007, and became Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President in February 2006. Until the merger, Mr. Weiner was also Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President and director of CastlePoint Re since March 2006, and held the same positions at CastlePoint Management Corp. since May 2006. Prior to joining CastlePoint, Mr. Weiner served as Senior Vice President of the Company from January 2004 to April 2006. From January 2002 until December 2003, he was employed as Managing Director at GAB Robins Capital Partners, which provides outsourcing for claim operations. From October 1991 to December 2001, he was employed by the accounting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, where he led that company’s U.S. middle market insurance consulting practice and advised many property and casualty insurers on strategic issues. He is an Associate member of the Casualty Actuarial Society and a member of the American Academy of Actuaries. Mr. Weiner received his B.S. from Drexel University and his M.B.A. from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.

16

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the ownership of the Company’s common stock as of March 16, 2010 by: (i) each person known to the Company to own beneficially more than 5% of the outstanding common stock; (ii) each of the Company’s Directors and persons referred to in the Summary Compensation Table; and (iii) all of the Directors and executive officers as a group. As used in this table, “beneficially owned” means the sole or shared power to vote or dispose of, or to direct the voting or disposition of, the shares, or the right to acquire such power within 60 days after March 16, 2010 with respect to any shares.

	Shares		Percent
	Beneficially		Beneficially
Name(1)	Owned(2)		Owned
Michael H. Lee(3)		3,983,817		8.7	%
BlackRock Inc.(4)		3,373,748		7.5	%
NWQ Investment Management Company, LLC(5)		2,796,587		6.2	%
Francis M. Colalucci(6)		76,725			*
Charles A. Bryan		14,503			*
William W. Fox, Jr.		6,121			*
Gary S. Maier		62,148			*
Elliot S. Orol		32,474			*
William A. Robbie		23,273			*
Steven W. Schuster		8,503			*
Robert S. Smith		19,513			*
Jan R. Van Gorder		10,050			*
Joel S. Weiner		139,103			*
Austin P. Young, III		11,503			*
Total Directors and Executive Officers		4,549,019		9.9	%

*	Less than 1%
(1)	Each named stockholder’s business address is 120 Broadway, New York, NY 10271, with the exceptions of BlackRock Inc., the business address of which is 40 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10022, and NWQ Investment Management Company, LLC, the business address of which is 2049 Century Park East, 16th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90067.
(2)	To the Company’s knowledge, the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by them, unless otherwise noted in the footnotes to this table.
(3)	Includes 83,700 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options held by Mrs. Helen Lee, Michael H. Lee’s wife, and 619,158 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options held by Mr. Lee. Mr. Lee has pledged 2,649,609 shares in connection with a loan agreement.
(4)	Based solely on the Schedule 13G filing made by BlackRock Inc. on January 29, 2010.
(5)	Based solely on the Schedule 13G filing made by NWQ Investment Management Company, LLC on February 12, 2010.
(6)	Includes 13,500 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires the Company’s officers and Directors and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities to file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership with the SEC. Such persons are required by SEC regulation to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on the Company’s review of the copies of such forms received by the Company with respect to fiscal year 2009 or written representations from certain reporting persons during the year ended December 31, 2009, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to the Directors, officers and greater than 10% stockholders were complied with by such persons, except that (i) one report covering

17

three transactions was filed late for Mr. Colalucci, (ii) three reports covering nine transactions were filed late for Mr. Lee, (iii) one report covering two transactions was filed late for Mr. Maier, (iv) three reports covering five transactions were filed late for Mr. Pechmann, and (v) two reports covering three transactions were filed late for Ms. Ranegar.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

The Company’s approach to employee compensation is based upon itspay-for-performance philosophy, which applies both to its Named Executive Officers included in the Summary Compensation Table below and to its employees generally. The Company’s executive compensation program is designed to attract and retain the services of highly qualified executives and to reward and provide incentives for individual performance as well as for overall Company performance. The Company seeks to establish and maintain a performance-driven, entrepreneurial culture that delivers exceptional value to its stockholders, and to attract and reward individuals who fit that culture and reflect the Company’s core values. To attract and retain highly skilled individuals, the Company’s compensation program is intended to be competitive with that offered by other employers within the industry that compete with the Company for talent. The Company uses all of the elements of its compensation program together to achieve these various objectives.

The compensation for each Named Executive Officer reflects his level of responsibility, the Company’s performance, achievement of individually established goals, personal contribution to the Company’s success, experience, expertise, knowledge of the Company’s operations and the insurance industry, and marketplace considerations. Other than the Chief Executive Officer, no Named Executive Officer or other officer plays a role in determining compensation for the Named Executive Officers.

Elements of Compensation

The Company’s management compensation program for its Named Executive Officers consists of the following four key elements: (i) base salary; (ii) an annual cash bonus, payable under the Tower Group, Inc. Short Term Performance Incentive Plan (the “Short Term Incentive Plan” or “STIP”) to designated individuals that is intended to qualify for tax deductibility under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”); (iii) an annual stock award, granted under the Tower Group, Inc. 2004 Long Term Equity Compensation Plan (as amended and restated, effective May 15, 2008, the “Long Term Equity Plan” or “LTEP”) to designated individuals that is intended to qualify for tax deductibility under Section 162(m) of the Code; and (iv) retirement income plans, including the Tower Group, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, the Company’s 401(k) Plan with matching Company contribution, and the Tower Group, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, which are described under “Elements of Compensation — Retirement Income Plans” below. The Company does not generally target any specific allocation among these various elements of compensation for Named Executive Officers or other employees.

Base Salaries. The annual base salary is the fixed element of compensation and is intended to attract and retain high performing executives. The level of base salary for each of the Company’s Named Executive Officers reflects his position and tenure with the Company, the Company’s needs, the Named Executive Officer’s individual performance, achievements and contributions to the Company, amounts paid to executives with comparable experience at peer insurance companies, and the overall financial results of the Company. In 2009, following the closing of the merger of CastlePoint into the Company, which allowed Mr. Lee to devote all of his time to serving as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, Mr. Lee’s base salary was increased from $550,000 to $900,000. Prior to the closing of the merger,

18

Mr. Lee had served as the Chief Executive Officer of both the Company and CastlePoint, for which he received an aggregate annual base salary of $926,250, consisting of an annual base salary of $550,000 from the Company and $376,250 from CastlePoint. In 2009, Mr. Colalucci’s base salary was increased from $341,250 to $361,725, and Mr. Maier’s base salary was increased from $325,000 to $337,999. Mr. Orol joined the Company on December 1, 2008, and his base salary of $325,000 was not increased in 2009. Mr. Weiner joined the Company on February 5, 2009, and his base salary of $340,000 was not increased in 2009.

Annual Cash Bonuses. The Named Executive Officers are eligible for annual cash bonuses under the Short Term Incentive Plan. At the beginning of each year, the Compensation Committee reviews the various bonus award criteria included in the Short Term Incentive Plan to determine which criteria to use in setting the annual bonus awards under the STIP for that year. The STIP bonus awards are intended to reflect the degree to which the Company meets its annual budget plan. For 2009, the STIP awards were determined with particular emphasis on the degree to which the Company achieved selected corporate performance targets (the “Basic Bonus Targets”) with respect to four equally weighted components: (1) operating return on equity (excluding gains and losses realized on investments and non-recurring transaction costs, but including gains realized by the Company from the sale of its shares of CastlePoint stock upon the February 5, 2009 merger of CastlePoint into a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company) (the “Adjusted Operating Return on Equity”), (2) growth in gross premiums written and produced, (3) combined ratio, and (4) growth in diluted book value per share. The Compensation Committee believes that the Basic Bonus Targets for annual cash bonus awards under the Short Term Incentive Plan have been set at levels that can be achieved only with significant effort on the part of the Chief Executive Officer and the other Named Executive Officers, and that payment of the maximum bonus award amounts under the STIP would reflect results substantially exceeding expectations.

For 2009, the Basic Bonus Target levels were set as follows:

(1) Mid-point: The mid-point level of the Basic Bonus Targets consisted of Adjusted Operating Return on Equity of 12.5%; growth in gross premiums written and produced of 7.5%; combined ratio of 97.5%; and growth in diluted book value per share of 7.5%. The Company’s achievement of the mid-point level of all Basic Bonus Targets would entitle the Chief Executive Officer to receive a cash bonus award under the STIP equal to 100% of his base salary. For achievement of less than 100% of the mid-points of the Basic Bonus Targets but more than the low level of the Basic Bonus Targets, the Chief Executive Officer would receive a cash bonus award under the STIP of correspondingly less than 100% of his base salary. For achievement of more than 100% of the mid-points of the Basic Bonus Targets, the Chief Executive Officer would receive a cash bonus award of correspondingly more than 100% of his base salary.

(2) Low: The ‘low’ level of the Basic Bonus Targets consisted of Adjusted Operating Return on Equity of 10.0%; growth in gross premiums written and produced of 5.0%; combined ratio of 100.0%; and growth in diluted book value per share of 5.0%. The Company’s achievement of the low level of all Basic Bonus Targets would entitle the Chief Executive Officer to receive a cash bonus award under the STIP equal to 50% of his base salary.

(3) High: The ‘high’ level of the Basic Bonus Targets consisted of Adjusted Operating Return on Equity of 15.0%; growth in gross premiums written and produced of 10.0%; combined ratio of 95.0%; and growth in diluted book value per share of 10.0%. The Company’s achievement of the high level of all Basic Bonus Targets would entitle the Chief Executive Officer to receive a cash bonus award under the STIP equal to 200% of his base salary, which is the maximum bonus award currently permitted by the Compensation Committee under the Short Term Incentive Plan.

19

(4) Maximum: The ‘maximum’ level of the Basic Bonus Targets consisted of Adjusted Operating Return on Equity of 17.5%; growth in gross premiums written and produced of 12.5% (assuming a combined ratio of 92.0% or better); combined ratio of 90.0%; and growth in diluted book value per share of 12.5%. The Company’s achievement of the maximum level of any Basic Bonus Target would result in a calculation for that Basic Bonus Target component of the STIP equal to 250% of the mid-point calculation for such Basic Bonus Target component, subject to the overall maximum cash bonus award payable to the Chief Executive Officer of 200% of his base salary as currently permitted by the Compensation Committee under the STIP.

For 2009, the Company achieved the following Basic Bonus Target levels: Adjusted Operating Return on Equity of 15.2%; growth in gross premiums written and produced of 34.5%; combined ratio of 88.3%; and growth in diluted book value per share of 62.6%. Based on this performance level, the Compensation Committee determined that Mr. Lee was entitled to receive the maximum bonus award under the STIP of 200.0% of his base salary, or $1,800,000. The Compensation Committee has discretion to adjust downward, but not upward, the annual cash bonus award payable to the Chief Executive Officer under the Short Term Incentive Plan.

With respect to the payment of annual cash bonus awards to Named Executive Officers other than the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Executive Officer provides recommendations to the Compensation Committee in the quarter following completion of the performance year based upon the degree of the Company’s achievement of the Basic Bonus Targets under the STIP and upon his subjective assessment of the performance and contribution of each Named Executive Officer. For each such Named Executive Officer, the target annual cash bonus award is expressed as a target percentage of his base salary (no less than 20%) or as a target bonus amount. The Compensation Committee then determines the amount of each Named Executive Officer’s cash bonus award, taking into consideration the recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer as well as the Committee’s own subjective assessment of the performance and contribution of such Named Executive Officer. For 2009, Mr. Colalucci received a bonus award under the STIP of $217,035; Mr. Maier received a bonus award under the STIP of $236,600; Mr. Orol received a bonus award under the STIP of $162,500; and Mr. Weiner received a bonus award under the STIP of $170,100. For a description of the factors considered by the Compensation Committee in making its assessment, see “The Compensation Committee’s Process — Assessment of Individual Performance” and “The Compensation Committee’s Process — Other Named Executive Officers” below. Because the annual bonus awards payable to Named Executive Officers other than the Chief Executive Officer are based upon the subjective assessments of the Chief Executive Officer and the Compensation Committee as well as upon the degree of the Company’s achievement of the Basic Bonus Targets under the Short Term Incentive Plan, these awards may vary upward or downward from the award amounts calculated under the STIP, subject to the maximum award amounts permitted by the Compensation Committee under the STIP, in the Committee’s discretion.

Reflecting its view that the interests of the Company’s executive officers should be closely aligned with the interests of its stockholders, the Compensation Committee determined, for 2009, to award to Mr. Lee a cash bonus under the Short Term Incentive Plan in an amount equal to 80% of the award that he would have otherwise received as a result of the Company’s level of achievement of the 2009 Basic Bonus Targets, and to award to Mr. Lee an equity grant under the LTEP vesting in four equal installments on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date in an amount equal to the remaining 20% of the award that he would have otherwise received under the Short Term Incentive Plan as a result of the Company’s level of achievement of the 2009 Basic Bonus Targets. For the same reason, the Compensation Committee determined, for 2009, to award to each of Messrs. Colalucci, Maier, Orol and Weiner a cash bonus under the Short Term Incentive Plan in an amount equal to 80% of the award that such Named Executive Officer would have otherwise received as a result of the Company’s level of

20

achievement of the 2009 Basic Bonus Targets, and to award to each of Messrs. Colalucci, Maier, Orol and Weiner an equity grant under the LTEP vesting in four equal installments on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date in an amount equal to the remaining 20% of the award that such Named Executive Officer would have otherwise received under the Short Term Incentive Plan as a result of the Company’s level of achievement of the 2009 Basic Bonus Targets. Accordingly, for 2009, Mr. Lee received a bonus award under the STIP consisting of $1,440,000 in cash and $360,000 in an equity grant under the LTEP vesting over four years; Mr. Colalucci received a bonus award under the STIP consisting of $173,628 in cash and $43,407 in an equity grant under the LTEP vesting over four years; Mr. Maier received a bonus award under the STIP consisting of $189,280 in cash and $47,320 in an equity grant under the LTEP vesting over four years; Mr. Orol received a bonus award under the STIP consisting of $130,000 in cash and $32,500 in an equity grant under the LTEP vesting over four years; and Mr. Weiner received a bonus award under the STIP consisting of $136,080 in cash and $34,020 in an equity grant under the LTEP vesting over four years.

The Short Term Incentive Plan supports the Company’s recruitment objectives by enabling the Company to attract qualified new employees. The STIP supports the Company’s retention and incentive objectives by providing Named Executive Officers with competitive compensation and appropriate incentives to enhance the profitability and growth of the Company, and by rewarding them for their service and personal contribution to the Company’s success.

Stock-Based Incentives. The Named Executive Officers are eligible for annual long term equity awards under the Long Term Equity Plan. Under the LTEP, stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance shares may be granted to key employees of the Company, including the Named Executive Officers. The Compensation Committee administers the Long Term Equity Plan and determines awards under the Plan in its discretion. The maximum annual bonus award currently permitted by the Compensation Committee to the Chief Executive Officer or other Named Executive Officer under the Long Term Equity Plan is 200% of his base salary (excluding awards made in settlement of payments earned under any other Company incentive or bonus plans). To provide consistent incentives to its executives, regardless of short-term variations in the price of the Company’s stock, the Compensation Committee approved, with the exception of a restricted stock unit award made to the Chief Executive Officer on March 14, 2008, only restricted stock awards for performance in 2009, 2008 and 2007 under the LTEP. The restricted stock awards approved for 2009, 2008 and 2007 performance vest in equal annual installments over a four-year period from the date of grant, with the exception of a restricted stock award made in March 2009 to each of Messrs. Lee, Colalucci and Maier in lieu of 70% of the respective cash bonus awards that they would otherwise have received for 2008 under the STIP, which vest in equal annual installments over a two-year period from the date of grant. The restricted stock unit award made to the Chief Executive Officer on March 14, 2008 vests in equal annual installments over a three-year period, with the first one-third of such restricted stock unit award having vested on December 31, 2009 and the remaining two installments vesting on December 31 of 2010 and 2011. For each Named Executive Officer, the target annual restricted stock award or restricted stock unit award is expressed as a target percentage of his base salary (no less than 20%) or as a target bonus amount. The number of shares received by each Named Executive Officer pursuant to his restricted stock award or restricted stock unit award under the LTEP is determined by dividing the stated value of the award by the price of the Company’s stock (equal to 100% of the average of the highest and lowest prices of the stock) on the date of grant. On March 5, 2010, 142,232 shares of restricted stock were granted under the Long Term Equity Plan to the Named Executive Officers based on their 2009 performance. Although the Company encourages ownership by officers of the Company’s stock through its equity-based awards, it does not currently have any stock ownership requirements for officers. On the occurrence of a change of control of the Company as described below, the options and stock appreciation rights issued under the Long Term Equity Plan become immediately exercisable and the restrictions on

21

restricted stock issued under the Long Term Equity Plan lapse. Historically, the Compensation Committee has awarded shares of restricted stock after the performance period. The Committee considers vesting on a change of control to be appropriate since the awards are essentially earned at the time of grant.

The amount of the restricted stock award made to the Chief Executive Officer under the LTEP for 2009 was determined by the degree to which the Company achieved the Basic Bonus Targets. As noted under “Elements of Compensation — Annual Cash Bonuses” above, the Committee believes that such Basic Bonus Targets have been set at levels that can be achieved only with significant effort on the part of the Chief Executive Officer and other Named Executive Officers. For a description of the various considerations relied upon by the Committee in making this determination for the Chief Executive Officer, please see “The Compensation Committee’s Process — Assessment of Individual Performance” and “The Compensation Committee’s Process — Chief Executive Officer” below. For a description of the considerations relied upon by the Compensation Committee in determining the amount of the annual award of restricted stock for the Named Executive Officers other than the Chief Executive Officer under the LTEP for 2009, which are similar to the considerations relied upon by the Committee in determining their annual bonus awards under the Short Term Incentive Plan, please see “The Compensation Committee’s Process — Assessment of Individual Performance” and “The Compensation Committee’s Process — Other Named Executive Officers” below.

The Compensation Committee believes that the Long Term Equity Plan supports the Company’s management compensation program by explicitly aligning the long term interests of the Named Executive Officers and other participating employees with those of the Company’s stockholders, by facilitating the retention of Named Executive Officers and by rewarding the Named Executive Officers for their service and personal contribution to the Company’s success. The Company believes that stock-based incentives emphasize the importance of improving stock price performance and increasing stockholder value over the long term by encouraging executives to own a meaningful amount of the Company’s common stock.

Retirement Income Plans. The Company’s retirement income plans include the Tower Group, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”), the Tower Group, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “SERP”) in which the Named Executive Officers and certain other officers of the Company are eligible to participate, and the Company’s 401(k) Plan with matching Company contribution, in which all employees are eligible to participate. The Deferred Compensation Plan is a voluntary, non-qualified plan offered, beginning in 2008, to all officers of the Company at the level of Vice President and above and to all of the Company’s Directors. Participants in the Deferred Compensation Plan are able to defer a portion of their current base salary and annual cash bonus, resulting in lower current taxable income and tax-deferred earnings growth on their deferred amounts. Each participant is able to self-direct the investment of his or her account balance from a choice of 18 valuation funds. Currently, 13 of the eligible officers and directors of the Company are enrolled in the Deferred Compensation Plan. Of the Named Executive Officers, only Mr. Orol participated in the Deferred Compensation Plan in 2009.

The SERP is a non-qualified defined contribution plan effective as of January 1, 2009 that is intended to enhance retirement benefits for the Company’s most senior executives and certain other key employees. Eligibility to participate in the SERP generally requires three years of prior employment with the Company for Senior Vice Presidents and between five and 10 years of prior employment with the Company for other key employees. In 2010, it is expected that all of the Named Executive Officers and certain other key executives selected at the discretion of the Compensation Committee will be eligible to participate in the SERP. Subject to the approval of the Compensation Committee, the Company may make annual contributions to the SERP on behalf of each participant. For Mr. Lee, the current annual contribution level is intended to provide him with a target annual benefit equal to 60% of his annual cash compensation upon retirement after 30 years of service. The SERP is not a defined benefit plan and such

22

target benefit level cannot be guaranteed. For other participants, the amount of the annual contribution is equal to 5.0% of their annual cash compensation. Company contributions for each participant remain unvested until such participant has completed 10 years of service with the Company, and vest in full upon completion of 10 years of service. The Compensation Committee has discretion to terminate the SERP at any time or to adjust upward or downward the level of the Company’s contribution each year.

In addition to the Deferred Compensation Plan and the SERP, each Named Executive Officer is eligible to participate in the Company’s 401(k) Plan. The 401(k) Plan provides for the Company to match each participating employee’s annual contributions to the Plan in an amount up to 4% of such employee’s base salary and cash bonus at the matching rate of $.50 per $1.00 contributed, subject to certain matching contribution limits under applicable law. The Company’s matching contributions vest ratably over a five-year period.

Supplemental Benefits. Except as noted below, Named Executive Officers participate in the Company’s health and welfare benefits on the same terms and conditions as other employees. Executive compensation also includes a limited number of supplemental benefits and perquisites for the Company’s key executives. These include a country club membership and an automobile allowance for the Chief Executive Officer and a supplemental medical reimbursement plan for executive officers in an annual amount of up to $5,000. The Company believes that its supplemental benefits and perquisites are customary and enhance the Company’s ability to retain talented executives.

The Compensation Committee’s Process

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, working with the Company’s senior management, develops and implements the Company’s executive compensation policies. The Compensation Committee is responsible for the Company’s compensation programs for its Named Executive Officers and for recommending to the Board of Directors the compensation of the Company’s Directors. The Compensation Committee is also responsible for the administration of the Long Term Equity Plan, including designating the recipients, amounts and terms of equity grants.

While the elements of compensation described above are considered separately, the Compensation Committee takes into account the full compensation package offered by the Company to each Named Executive Officer, including healthcare and other benefits.

The Compensation Committee conducts its review of executive performance and compensation on an annual basis and generally adjusts base salaries and makes cash bonus and equity-based awards annually in the first calendar quarter of the year following the performance year. This process includes an assessment of the performance of the Company and of each Named Executive Officer for the year, and a comparison of each Named Executive Officer’s compensation to market data for executives in similar positions at peer companies of the Company. The Committee engages an independent compensation consultant to compile this market data. For information with respect to the independent compensation consultant and the information it provides to the Committee, please see “The Compensation Committee’s Process — Benchmarking against Peer Group” below. Compensation adjustments can be made during the year if circumstances are appropriate, such as when an individual is promoted or takes on additional responsibilities. Equity-based awards may also be made to individuals during the year in which they join the Company.

Assessment of Company Performance. When evaluating Company performance, the Committee considers various measures, including: growth, measured by the increase in gross premiums written and produced; underwriting profit, measured by the Company’s combined ratio; profitability; operating earnings (net income, excluding gains and losses realized on investments, net of tax, and non-recurring transaction costs); diluted operating earnings per share; and increase in shareholder value over various

23

periods of time, measured by return on average equity (excluding gains and losses realized on investments, net of tax, and non-recurring transaction costs) and diluted book value per share. The Committee does not apply a formula or assign these performance measures relative weights. Instead, it makes a subjective determination after considering such Company performance measures collectively compared to the performance of companies in the Company’s peer group and the industry. The Committee also takes into consideration other significant Company events (such as public offerings of the Company’s securities and acquisitions) and general economic conditions (such as investment and credit market conditions).

Assessment of Individual Performance. The Compensation Committee considers the individual performance of each Named Executive Officer. With respect to the Chief Executive Officer, the Committee meets in executive session to conduct his performance review based on the measures discussed above, his contribution to the Company’s performance and other leadership accomplishments.

For each of the other Named Executive Officers, the Compensation Committee receives a performance assessment and compensation recommendation from the Chief Executive Officer during a meeting of the Committee and also exercises its independent judgment based on the Board’s interaction with the Named Executive Officer. Factors that are evaluated to determine each Named Executive Officer’s individual contribution include his or her strategic vision, leadership and management skills, technical skills and judgment in performing his or her tasks. In addition, Named Executive Officers, like all employees, are evaluated on how they reflect the core values of the Company: leadership, passion, hard work, teamwork, innovation, customer service, trust, flexibility, social responsibility and excellence.

Benchmarking against Peer Group. In setting compensation, the Compensation Committee compares the elements of compensation for the Company’s executives against the compensation of executives at a peer group of publicly traded insurance companies of comparable size and complexity. The Committee retains an executive compensation consulting firm to assist it in selecting appropriate peer companies and to obtain and organize the information. The Committee selects the peer group companies after discussions with management and the consulting firm. The Committee compares the Company’s executive compensation program as a whole to the peer group and compares the compensation of individual executives to their counterparts at the peer group if the positions are sufficiently similar to make the comparison meaningful. The Committee uses the peer group data to ensure that the compensation program, including each component element, is competitive and as one factor in the decision on what compensation levels to set. The peer group used for 2009 consisted of Alleghany Corporation, AmTrust Financial Services, Inc., Argo Group International Holdings, Ltd., Aspen Insurance Holdings, Ltd., The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc., Harleysville Group Inc., HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc., The Navigators Group, Inc., OneBeacon Insurance Group, Ltd., Selective Insurance Group, Inc. and Validus Holdings, Ltd.

The executive compensation consultant Pearl Meyer & Partners provided a report to the Compensation Committee in December 2009. This report compared the Company’s compensation program to those of its peer companies and to available compensation surveys, and included salary ranges and commonly used equity-based incentives, structure and mix of compensation, design, and content of annual and long term incentive plans. Since one of the objectives of the Company’s compensation program is to attract and retain talented executives, the Committee generally sets each Named Executive Officer’s compensation at or above the 50th percentile of the range provided in the report. Similarly, the Committee has determined that the 75th percentile is a reasonable upper boundary on compensation levels. The Committee believes that this compensation range is further supported by the Company’s performance when compared to its peer group. In certain circumstances, the Named Executive Officer’s compensation may fall outside the intended range due to performance or market conditions. Other than providing these reports to and discussing them with the Compensation Committee, Pearl Meyer &

24

Partners played no role in advising the Chief Executive Officer or the Compensation Committee on compensation decisions in 2009.

Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Lee serves as the Company’s Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer. In determining Mr. Lee’s compensation for 2009, the Compensation Committee applied the principles outlined above. The Company’s financial performance in 2009 was exceptional as exhibited by the following key measures: (i) Adjusted Operating Return on Equity of 15.2%; (ii) growth in the Company’s gross premiums written and produced of 34.5% to $1.1 billion in 2009 from $805.0 million in 2008; (iii) the net combined ratio for 2009 of 88.3%; (iv) growth in diluted book value per share of 62.6% to $23.35 at year-end 2009 from $14.36 at year-end 2008; (v) growth in operating income of 79% to $119 million in 2009 from $66.8 million in 2008; and (vi) growth in stockholders’ equity of 213% to $1.1 billion at year-end 2009 from $335 million at year-end 2008. These key measures include the effects of the merger, as of February 5, 2009, of CastlePoint into a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.

Mr. Lee’s individual performance was likewise evaluated by the Committee to be superior and played the most significant role in the Company’s exceptional performance. Mr. Lee is responsible for developing the Company’s strategies and implementing them through his highly effective leadership of the Company. Mr. Lee’s accomplishments include leading the Company’s profitable growth, notwithstanding the highly challenging market and investment environment in 2009, overseeing the closing of four acquisitions by the Company during 2009, and negotiating the terms of the Company’s acquisition of the personal lines division of OneBeacon Insurance Group, Ltd., which was announced on February 2, 2010 and is expected to close at the end of the second quarter of 2010.

The Compensation Committee and Board of Directors determined Mr. Lee’s compensation for 2009 as follows: Mr. Lee received cash compensation of $2,252,500 for 2009, consisting of an annual salary of $812,500 and a cash bonus of $1,440,000 under the Short Term Incentive Plan. As described under “Elements of Compensation — Annual Cash Bonuses” above, for 2009 Mr. Lee received, in lieu of a portion of the cash bonus award that he would otherwise have received under the STIP, an equity grant on March 5, 2010 under the Long Term Equity Plan in the amount of $360,000, which vests in equal annual installments over four years from the date of grant. For the long-term incentive component of his compensation for 2009, Mr. Lee received a restricted stock award in the amount of $1,800,000 under the Long Term Equity Plan, which vests in four equal installments on March 5 of 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014. In determining Mr. Lee’s base salary for 2010, the Compensation Committee considered several factors, including the significant salary increase awarded to Mr. Lee in 2009 following the completion of the merger of CastlePoint into the Company, the reasonableness of Mr. Lee’s overall compensation structure, including his base salary and his short term and long term bonus award opportunities, relative to other chief executive officers in the Company’s peer group, and the need to set Mr. Lee’s compensation structure to adequately reflect his superior performance as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee determined that Mr. Lee’s annual base salary of $900,000 should be continued in 2010. The Compensation Committee believes that Mr. Lee’s overall compensation is reasonable when compared with the compensation of chief executive officers of peer group companies, especially in view of the exceptional performance achieved by the Company in 2009. The Committee believes that Mr. Lee’s compensation mix strikes an appropriate balance between salary and variable compensation arrangements, is competitive with the Company’s peer group and is consistent with the Company’s compensation policies for employees in general. The STIP and LTEP bonus awards are tied to the Compensation Committee’s evaluation of Mr. Lee’s performance and the Company’s performance and take into consideration the key measures described above. Time-based restricted stock awards provide

25

rewards if Mr. Lee stays with the Company for the required vesting periods, and the benefit to him increases only if the holdings of other stockholders increase in value as well. A large part of Mr. Lee’s overall compensation is thus tied to Company performance.

Other Named Executive Officers. The same evaluation of the Company performance applicable to the Chief Executive Officer was used for the other Named Executive Officers as well. On an individual basis, the Compensation Committee reviewed similar individual considerations for those officers. The base salary for each such Named Executive Officer was set by the Compensation Committee in the first quarter of 2009. The base salary was set based on the individual’s position and experience, and on peer company and compensation survey information provided to the Committee by the executive compensation consultant. The 2009 performance review for each Named Executive Officer other than the Chief Executive Officer began with an evaluation provided by the Chief Executive Officer. The Committee then reviewed the performance of the Named Executive Officer and his contribution to the Company’s performance, his adherence to the core values of the Company (including leadership, passion, hard work, teamwork, innovation, customer service, trust, flexibility, social responsibility and excellence), and his achievement of specific functional goals, and took into consideration compensation information for similar positions at peer companies to arrive at the total compensation package, including the mix of overall compensation. With respect to each such Named Executive Officer, the Committee considered his contribution to the successful integration into the Company of several companies acquired by the Company in 2009 and the due diligence to support the Company’s mergers and acquisitions activity. With respect to Mr. Colalucci, the Committee also considered his contribution to the enhancements in the Company’s risk management process and the strengthening of the Company’s financial statement and expense reporting processes. Mr. Maier contributed significantly to the achievement by the Company of its loss ratio, production, underwriting profitability and other financial objectives, and its significant territorial expansion and product growth. Mr. Orol contributed significantly to the structuring, staffing and client service orientation of the Company’s legal function, and the control of outside legal costs. Mr. Weiner contributed significantly to the development of the Company’s enterprise risk management process and reporting, and the enhancement of the Company’s reserving and premium planning processes. Based on these considerations, the recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer, the overall financial performance of the Company and the compensation report provided by Pearl Meyer and Partners, the Compensation Committee determined the 2009 short term bonus and long term equity-based compensation and established the 2009 base salary for each Named Executive Officer other than the Chief Executive Officer. As described under “Elements of Compensation — Annual Cash Bonuses” above, the Committee approved an equity award grant under the LTEP to each such Named Executive Officer in lieu of a portion of the cash bonus award that he would otherwise have received under the STIP. Such equity award grant vests over four years from the date of grant. Mr. Colalucci received cash compensation of $531,941 for 2009 (consisting of an annual salary of $358,313 and a cash bonus of $173,628), and restricted stock valued at $260,442 in an equity award grant that vests in equal annual installments on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date but that, based on the provisions of his employment agreement with the Company and his previously announced intention to retire in 2010, would vest fully upon such retirement. (For a description of the provisions of Mr. Colalucci’s employment agreement, please see “Summary of Key Agreements — Other Named Executive Officers’ Employment Agreements” below.) Mr. Maier received cash compensation of $525,113 for 2009 (consisting of an annual salary of $335,833 and a cash bonus of $189,280), and restricted stock valued at $283,920 in an equity award grant that vests in equal annual installments on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date. Mr. Orol received cash compensation of $455,000 for 2009 (consisting of an annual salary of $325,000 and a cash bonus of $130,000) and restricted stock valued at $195,000 in an equity award grant that vests in equal annual installments on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date. Mr. Weiner received cash compensation of

26

$391,230 for 2009 (consisting of an annual salary of $255,150 and cash bonus of $136,080) and restricted stock with a value of $204,120 in an equity award grant that vests in equal annual installments on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date. The Compensation Committee believes that the compensation mix for these Named Executive Officers strikes an appropriate balance between salary and variable compensation arrangements, is competitive with the Company’s peer group and is consistent with the Company’s compensation policies for employees in general.

Employment Agreements. The Company enters into employment agreements to attract and retain talented executives. The Company has entered into employment agreements with certain of its executive officers, including each of the Named Executive Officers. These employment agreements were reviewed in prior years by the Compensation Committee. Based on this review, the Company believes the terms of these agreements are competitive with those entered into by its peer companies. For a description of the employment agreements with Named Executive Officers, see “Summary of Key Agreements” below.

There are nochange-in-control agreements or severance agreements between the Company and its Named Executive Officers other than provisions set forth in (i) the employment agreements between the Company and its Named Executive Officers and (ii) the Long Term Equity Plan. For a description of these provisions with respect to the Named Executive Officers, see “Summary of Key Agreements” below.

Tax Considerations. Under Section 162(m) of the Code, annual compensation in excess of $1,000,000 paid to certain executive officers of a publicly held corporation will not be deductible, unless such compensation is based upon performance objectives meeting certain regulatory criteria or is otherwise excluded from the limitation. Incentive compensation paid to the Company’s executive officers pursuant to the Company’s Short Term Incentive Plan and Long Term Equity Plan currently is intended to qualify for deductibility by the Company under Section 162(m).

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee of the Company has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) ofRegulation S-K and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting.

The Compensation Committee

Charles A. Bryan, Chairman
Steven W. Schuster
Robert S. Smith
Jan R. Van Gorder

27

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table sets forth a summary of the compensation paid by the Company to the Chief Executive Officer, the Principal Financial Officer and each of the three other most highly paid executive officers of the Company or its subsidiaries (the “Named Executive Officers”).

													Change in
													Pension
													Value and
											Non-		Nonqualified
											Equity		Deferred		All
Name and							Stock		Option		Incentive		Compensation		Other
Principal Position	Year		Salary		Bonus		Awards(1)		Awards		Compensation		Earnings		Compensation(2)		Total
Michael H. Lee		2009	$	812,500	$	1,440,000	$	1,662,378		—		—		—	$	522,820	$	4,437,698
Chairman of the Board		2008		541,667		242,770		1,559,244		—		—		—		51,530		2,395,211
President and Chief		2007		495,209		750,000		900,121		—		—		—		48,722		2,194,052
Executive Officer
Francis M. Colalucci		2009		358,313		173,628		435,093		—		—		—		20,819		987,853
Senior Vice President		2008		338,542		76,781		211,238		—		—		—		18,372		644,933
Chief Financial Officer		2007		319,168		211,250		204,021		—		—		—		16,689		751,128
Treasurer and Director
Gary S. Maier		2009		335,833		189,280		364,650		—		—		—		35,394		925,157
Senior Vice President		2008		320,000		64,350		177,009		—		—		—		10,906		572,265
Chief Underwriting		2007		290,000		177,000		106,015		—		—		—		9,433		582,448
Officer
Elliot S. Orol		2009		325,000		130,000		130,000		—		—		390		37,200		622,590
Senior Vice President		2008		28,176		130,000		472,500		—		—		—		1,148		631,824
General Counsel and		2007		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Secretary
Joel S. Weiner		2009		255,150		136,080		320,080		—		—		—		26,136		737,446
Senior Vice President		2008		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Chief Actuary and		2007		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Strategic Planning

(1)

Reflects the grant date fair value in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See Note 14, “Stock Based Compensation”, in the Notes to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 for the assumptions used to determine the compensation costs associated with stock and option awards that the Company expensed in 2009, 2008 and 2007.

(2)

See the All Other Compensation Table for additional information.

ALL OTHER COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table describes each component of the All Other Compensation column in the Summary Compensation Table above.

													Dividends
			Country				Officer		401 K		Term		on				All
			Club		Car		Medical		Match		Life Ins		Restricted		SERP		Other
Name	Year		Dues		Allowance		Reimbursement		Expense		Premium		Stock		Contribution(1)		Compensation
Michael H. Lee		2009	$	10,000	$	12,000	$	5,000		9,800	$	756	$	29,728	$	455,536	$	522,820
		2008		10,000		12,000		5,000		9,200		924		14,406		—		51,530
		2007		8,215		12,000		5,000		9,000		1,043		13,464		—		48,722
Francis M. Colalucci		2009		—		—		2,605		9,800		491		7,923		—		20,819
		2008		—		—		5,000		9,200		924		3,248		—		18,372
		2007		—		—		5,000		9,000		1,043		1,646		—		16,689
Gary S. Maier		2009		—		—		—		8,250		756		6,270		20,118		35,394
		2008		—		—		—		7,750		924		2,232		—		10,906
		2007		—		—		—		7,750		961		722		—		9,433
Elliot S. Orol		2009		—		—		5,000		2,147		756		6,547		22,750		37,200
		2008		—		—		—		—		77		1,071		—		1,148
		2007		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Joel S. Weiner		2009		—		—		—		5,370		414		3,342		17,010		26,136
		2008		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
		2007		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

⁽¹⁾ Company contributions to the SERP for each participant remain unvested until such participant has completed 10 years of service with the Company, and vest in full upon completion of 10 years of service.

28

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS IN 2009

The following table provides information concerning awards made to the Named Executive Officers under the Company’s 2004 Long Term Equity Compensation Plan in 2009.

			All Other		Grant
			Stock		Date Fair
			Awards:		Value
	Grant		Number		of Stock
Name	Date		of Shares(1)		Awards(1)(2)
Michael H. Lee(3)		02/05/09		44,008	$	1,095,913
Michael H. Lee(4)(7)		03/13/09		24,270		566,465
Francis M. Colalucci(5)(7)		03/12/09		11,201		255,937
Francis M. Colalucci(6)		03/12/09		7,841		179,156
Gary S. Maier(5)(7)		03/12/09		9,387		214,500
Gary S. Maier(6)		03/12/09		6,571		150,150
Elliot S. Orol(5)(7)		03/12/09		5,689		130,000
Joel S. Weiner(3)(7)		02/05/09		12,853		320,080

(1)	The fair value reported is the average of the high and low price on the date of grant. The Company pays dividends on unvested outstanding restricted shares.
(2)	This amount reflects the grant date fair value in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.
(3)	The restricted shares granted on February 5, 2009 vest in three equal installments on April 5, 2010, June 5, 2011 and August 5, 2012.
(4)	The restricted shares granted on March 13, 2009 vest in two equal installments on March 13, 2010 and March 13, 2011.
(5)	The restricted shares granted on March 12, 2009 vest: 25% each March 12th in 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013.
(6)	The restricted shares granted on March 12, 2009 vest in two equal installments on March 12, 2010 and March 12, 2011.
(7)	In addition to the information included above, on March 5, 2010 restricted stock shares with grant date fair values were awarded to all Named Executive Officers, as follows:

	Restricted
	Stock		Grant Date
Named Executive Officer	Shares(a)		Fair Value(b)
Michael H. Lee		98,992	$	2,160,005
Francis M. Colalucci		11,936		260,444
Gary S. Maier		13,012		283,922
Elliot S. Orol		8,937		195,005
Joel S. Weiner		9,355		204,126

(a)	The March 5, 2010 restricted shares granted vest 25% each March 5th of 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014.
(b)	This amount reflects the grant date fair value in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The Company pays dividends on unvested outstanding restricted stock shares.

29

Summary of Key Agreements

Chief Executive Officer Employment Agreement. Under Mr. Lee’s employment agreement, dated as of August 1, 2004, Mr. Lee has agreed to serve as the Company’s Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Lee’s term of service under this agreement continues for five years followed by automatic additional one-year terms unless notice not to extend the term is provided by the Company or Mr. Lee at least one year prior to the end of the term. Mr. Lee receives an annual base salary and an annual incentive bonus, to be determined by the Board of Directors, with the target bonus in an amount equal to his annual base salary. Mr. Lee’s salary and target annual bonus are subject to review for increase at the discretion of the Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors. Mr. Lee may also participate in certain executive benefit plans, which may include a paid country club membership up to $10,000 annually and a monthly car allowance up to $1,000. Mr. Lee may also participate in the Company’s long-term incentive plans.

If Mr. Lee’s employment terminates as a result of disability or death, Mr. Lee’s employment agreement automatically terminates, and he or his designated beneficiary or administrator, as applicable, is entitled to accrued salary through the termination date and a prorated target bonus. Additionally, all of Mr. Lee’s stock-based awards will vest and his stock options will remain exercisable for one year after the date his employment terminates (or until the last day of the stock option term, whichever occurs first).

If the Company terminates Mr. Lee’s employment agreement for cause, which includes conviction of, or Mr. Lee’s pleadingnolo contendereto, a crime involving moral turpitude or a felony, gross negligence or gross misconduct, all of the Company’s obligations under the agreement cease. Mr. Lee will only be entitled to receive his accrued base salary and all outstanding incentive awards are forfeited. If Mr. Lee voluntarily terminates his employment agreement with the Company without good reason and not due to death, disability or retirement, all of the Company’s obligations under the agreement cease, and Mr. Lee will be entitled to receive his accrued base salary plus a prorated target bonus. In the case of voluntary termination, Mr. Lee will have three months (or until the last day of the stock option term, whichever occurs first) to exercise any vested stock options, and all unvested incentive awards will be forfeited.

If the Company terminates Mr. Lee’s employment without cause or if Mr. Lee terminates his employment with good reason, as defined in the employment agreement, then Mr. Lee is entitled to (i) his accrued base salary and a prorated target bonus, (ii) a cash severance payment equal to 300% of the sum of his annual base salary and the highest annual bonus paid to him within the preceding three years, (iii) the continuation of life, accident and health insurance coverage for three years, and (iv) at least three months (or until the last day of the stock option term, whichever occurs first) to exercise any vested stock options. If the Company terminates Mr. Lee’s employment agreement without cause, or if Mr. Lee terminates his employment with good reason, in anticipation of, or within the24-month period following, a change of control, as defined in the employment agreement, Mr. Lee is also entitled to receive the foregoing benefits and the immediate vesting of his previously unvested stock awards. The employment agreement also provides for an excise taxgross-up payment if payments received under the agreement and other payments received under other agreements or employee benefit plans result in the imposition of an excise tax under section 4999 of the Code.

If Mr. Lee retires, he receives his accrued base salary, a prorated target bonus, applicable retiree benefits, if any, and vesting of previously unvested stock awards, and his stock options will remain exercisable for the full option term. Mr. Lee will be eligible to retire for purposes of his employment agreement upon attainment of age 55 with 15 years of service.

30

Mr. Lee is also subject, under the terms of his employment agreement, to non-competition provisions in the states of New York and New Jersey and to non-solicitation provisions for a period of two years after termination of employment, along with ongoing confidentiality and non-disclosure requirements.

Other Named Executive Officers’ Employment Agreements. Under their respective employment agreements, each Named Executive Officer has agreed to serve in his current positionand/or in such other positions as the Company may assign. The initial term of service under the agreements is one year for Messrs. Colalucci and Maier and two years for Messrs. Orol and Weiner, followed in each case by automatic additional one-year terms unless a notice not to extend the term is provided by the Company or the employee prior to the end of the term. The amount of notice required is three months for Mr. Colalucci, six months for Mr. Maier, and one year for Mr. Orol and Mr. Weiner.

Each Named Executive Officer receives a minimum annual base salary and an annual incentive bonus, to be determined by the Board of Directors, with the target bonus of 20% of the annual base salary for Mr. Colalucci, 30% of the annual base salary for Mr. Maier, 40% of the annual base salary for Mr. Orol, and 50% of the annual base salary for Mr. Weiner. Each Named Executive Officer’s salary and target annual bonus are subject to review for increase at the discretion of the Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors; however, they cannot be decreased below the salaries and target bonus percentages stated above. Each named executive may also participate in the Company’s long-term incentive plans. Effective March 1, 2010, the current annual base salaries for Messrs. Maier, Orol and Weiner were increased to $385,000, $340,000, and $350,000, respectively.

If a Named Executive Officer’s employment terminates as a result of disability or death, his employment agreement automatically terminates, and he or his designated beneficiary or administrator, as applicable, is entitled to accrued salary through the termination date and a prorated target bonus. Additionally, all stock-based awards will vest and his stock options will remain exercisable for one year after the date his employment terminates (or until the last day of the stock option term, whichever occurs first).

If the Company terminates the employment of the Named Executive Officer without cause or if the Named Executive Officer terminates his employment with good reason, as defined in his employment agreement, then the terminated employee is entitled to (i) his accrued base salary and a prorated target bonus, (ii) a cash severance payment equal to 100% of the sum of his annual base salary and his target annual bonus, (iii) the continuation of health and welfare benefits for one year and (iv) three months (or until the last day of the stock option term, whichever occurs first) to exercise any vested stock options. The employment agreement of Mr. Maier also provides for the vesting of outstanding equity-based compensation. If the Company terminates a Named Executive Officer’s employment agreement without cause, or if the Named Executive Officer terminates his employment with good reason, in anticipation of, or within the24-month period following, a change in control as defined in the employment agreement, the Named Executive Officer is entitled to receive the foregoing benefits and is also entitled to immediate vesting of his previously unvested stock awards. The employment agreements also provide for an excise taxgross-up payment if payments received under the agreement and other payments received under other agreements or employee benefit plans result in the imposition of an excise tax under section 4999 of the Code.

If a Named Executive Officer retires, he receives his accrued base salary through the retirement date, prorated target bonus, applicable retiree benefits, if any, and vesting of previously unvested stock awards, and his stock options will remain exercisable for the full option term. Under the terms of Mr. Colalucci’s employment agreement, he is eligible to receive the above payments and benefits if requested to retire by the Company before he attains age 62 or at his discretion after attaining age 62 and he is currently eligible to retire. Under the terms of the employment agreements of Mr. Orol and Mr. Weiner, each is

31

eligible to receive the above payments and benefits upon retirement after attaining age 62. Mr. Maier may retire under the terms of his employment agreement upon attainment of age 55 with 15 years of service.

The Named Executive Officers are subject under the terms of their respective employment agreements to non-solicitation provisions for a period of six months or one year after the termination of their employment, along with ongoing confidentiality and non-disclosure requirements. Messrs. Colalucci and Maier are also subject to non-competition provisions in the states of New York and New Jersey.

In the “Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment or Change of Control” table below, amounts are not provided for the financial effect of a termination for cause, as defined in each Named Executive Officer’s employment agreement, because the Named Executive Officers are not entitled to further benefits or compensation following such a termination.

2004 Long Term Equity Compensation Plan. On the occurrence of a change in control, options issued under the 2004 Long Term Equity Plan become immediately exercisable and the period of restriction for any restricted stock issued under the LTEP lapses. A change in control is defined under the Long Term Equity Plan to mean any of the following events: (a) any Person (other than the Company, any trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under an employee benefit plan of the Company, or any corporation owned directly or indirectly by the stockholders of the Company in substantially the same proportion as the ownership of stock of the Company) that is not on August 26, 2004 the “beneficial owner” (as defined inRule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing more than 20% of the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities becomes after August 26, 2004 the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing more than 20% of the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities; (b) individuals who, as of August 26, 2004, constitute the Board (the “Incumbent Board”) cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board of the Company, provided that any person becoming a director subsequent to the date hereof whose election, or nomination for election by the Company’s stockholders, was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the directors then comprising the Incumbent Board (other than an election or nomination of an individual whose initial assumption of office is in connection with an actual or threatened election contest relating to the election of the directors of the Company) shall be, for purposes of this definition, considered as though such person were a member of the Incumbent Board; (c) consummation of a merger, consolidation, reorganization, share exchange or similar transaction (a “Transaction”) of the Company with any other entity, other than (i) a Transaction that would result in the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto directly or indirectly continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity or a parent company) more than 80% of the combined voting power of the voting securities of the Company or such surviving entity or parent company outstanding immediately after such Transaction or (ii) a Transaction effected to implement a recapitalization of the Company (or similar transaction) in which no Person acquires more than 20% of the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities; (d) the sale, transfer or other disposition (in one transaction or a series of related transactions) of more than 50% of the operating assets of the Company; or (e) the approval by the shareholders of a plan or proposal for the liquidation or dissolution of the Company.

32

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT DECEMBER 31, 2009

The following table sets forth information for each Named Executive Officer with respect to his outstanding equity awards as of December 31, 2009.

Option Awards

Stock Awards

Number of

Number of

Market

Securities

Securities

Number of

Value of

Underlying

Underlying

Stock

Shares of

Shares of

Option

Unexercised

Unexercised

Option

Option

Award

Stock That

Stock That

Grant

Options

Options

Exercise

Expiration

Grant

Have Not

Have Not

Name

Date

Exercisable

Unexercisable

Price

Date

Date

Vested

Vested

Michael H. Lee(1)

01/01/01

83,700

$

2.78

01/01/11

Michael H. Lee(2)

09/29/04

94,500

8.50

09/29/14

Michael H. Lee(3)

04/01/06

455,364

18.45

04/01/16

Michael H. Lee(3)

03/22/07

37,516

19,327

26.75

03/22/17

Michael H. Lee(3)

03/10/08

31,778

64,520

18.67

03/10/18

Michael H. Lee(2)(7)

03/31/06

6,077

$

142,263

Michael H. Lee(2)

03/01/07

16,587

388,302

Michael H. Lee(3)

03/13/08

22,811

534,006

Michael H. Lee(3)

02/05/09

44,008

1,030,227

Michael H. Lee(6)

03/13/09

24,270

568,161

Francis M. Colalucci(2)

09/29/04

13,500

—

8.50

09/29/14

Francis M. Colalucci(2)

03/31/06

1,138

26,641

Francis M. Colalucci(2)

03/01/07

3,759

87,998

Francis M. Colalucci(4)

03/13/08

6,425

150,409

Francis M. Colalucci(4)

03/12/09

11,201

262,215

Francis M. Colalucci(6)

03/12/09

7,841

183,558

Gary S. Maier(2)

03/31/06

747

17,487

Gary S. Maier(2)

03/01/07

1,953

45,720

Gary S. Maier(4)

03/13/08

5,384

126,039

Gary S. Maier(4)

03/12/09

9,387

219,750

Gary S. Maier(6)

03/12/09

6,571

153,827

Elliot S. Orol(5)

12/01/08

14,277

334,225

Elliot S. Orol(4)

03/12/09

5,689

133,179

Joel S. Weiner(3)

04/01/06

69,795

18.45

04/01/16

Joel S. Weiner(3)

03/22/07

22,920

11,810

26.75

03/22/17

Joel S. Weiner(3)

03/10/08

9,046

18,367

18.67

03/10/18

Joel S. Weiner(3)

02/05/09

12,853

300,889

(1)	These options are held by Mrs. Helen Lee, Mr. Lee’s wife. These options were fully vested on grant date.
(2)	Vest 20% per year on each grant date anniversary.
(3)	Vest in three equal installments every 14 months over a period of three and one-half years from the date of grant.
(4)	Vest 25% per year on each grant date anniversary.
(5)	Vest 33% per year on each grant date anniversary.
(6)	Vest 50% per year on each grant date anniversary.
(7)	Excludes the restricted stock units having a value of $809,235 issued to Mr. Lee on March 10, 2009 pursuant to the restricted stock unit award made to Mr. Lee on March 14, 2008 under the Long Term Equity Plan, which vests in three equal annual installments on December 31, of 2009, 2010 and 2011.

33

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table provides information with respect to the Company’s equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2009.

	A		B		C
					Number of securities
					remaining available
	Number of securities to				for future issuance
	be issued upon exercise				under equity
	of outstanding options		Weighted average		compensation plans
	and vesting of		exercise price of		(excluding securities
Plan Category	unvested stock grants		outstanding options		reflected in column A)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders		643,713	$	5.63		1,540,443
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders		—		—		—
Total		643,713	$	5.63		1,540,443

OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED IN 2009

The following table sets forth information for each Named Executive Officer with respect to stock options that were exercised and restricted shares that vested, and the value realized on such exercise or vesting, during 2009.

	Option Awards				Stock Awards
	Number of				Number of
	Shares		Value		Shares		Value
	Acquired on		Realized on		Acquired on		Realized on
Name	Exercise		Exercise		Vesting		Vesting
Michael H. Lee(1)		—		—		7,603	$	177,454
Michael H. Lee(2)		—		—		5,529		129,572
Michael H. Lee(3)		6,300	$	139,986		—		—
Michael H. Lee(4)		—		—		3,038		72,396
Francis M. Colalucci(5)		—		—		2,141		49,971
Francis M. Colalucci(6)		—		—		1,253		29,364
Francis M. Colalucci(7)		—		—		570		13,583
Gary S. Maier(8)		—		—		1,794		41,872
Gary S. Maier(9)		—		—		651		15,256
Gary S. Maier(10)		—		—		373		8,889
Elliot S. Orol(11)		—		—		7,137		175,249

(1)	On March 13, 2009 Mr. Lee acquired 7,603 shares with a market price of $23.34 per share upon the lapse of Restricted Stock Shares.
(2)	On March 16, 2009 Mr. Lee acquired 5,529 shares with a market price of $23.44 per share upon the lapse of Restricted Stock Shares.
(3)	On March 19, 2009 Mrs. Helen Lee, Michael H. Lee’s spouse, exercised 6,300 options to purchase shares with an exercise price of $2.78 per share and immediately sold the acquired shares at a market price of $25.00 per share.
(4)	On March 30, 2009 Mr. Lee acquired 3,038 shares with a market price of $23.83 per share upon the lapse of Restricted Stock Shares.
(5)	On March 13, 2009 Mr. Colalucci acquired 2,141 shares with a market price of $23.34 per share upon the lapse of Restricted Stock Shares.
(6)	On March 16, 2009 Mr. Colalucci acquired 1,253 shares with a market price of $23.44 per share upon the lapse of Restricted Stock Shares.
(7)	On March 30, 2009 Mr. Colalucci acquired 570 shares with a market price of $23.83 per share upon the lapse of Restricted Stock Shares.
(8)	On March 13, 2009 Mr. Maier acquired 1,794 shares with a market price of $23.34 per share upon the lapse of Restricted Stock Shares.
(9)	On March 16, 2009 Mr. Maier acquired 651 shares with a market price of $23.44 per share upon the lapse of Restricted Stock Shares.
(10)	On March 28, 2009 Mr. Maier acquired 373 shares with a market price of $23.83 per share upon the lapse of Restricted Stock Shares.
(11)	On December 1, 2009 Mr. Orol acquired 7,137 shares with a market price of $24.56 per share upon the lapse of Restricted Stock Shares.

34

NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION FOR 2009

The following table sets forth information for each Named Executive Officer with respect to his contribution in 2009, if any, to the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan.

									Aggregate
	Executive		Registrant		Aggregate		Aggregate		Balance
	Contributions		Contributions		Earnings		Withdrawals/		December 31,
Name	in 2009		in 2009		in 2009		Distributions		2009
Michael H. Lee		—		—		—		—		—
Francis M. Colalucci		—		—		—		—		—
Gary S. Maier		—		—		—		—		—
Elliot S. Orol(1)	$	16,250		—	$	390		—	$	16,640
Joel S. Weiner		—		—		—		—		—

⁽¹⁾ Contributions were invested in the MFS Government Securities, Fidelity VIP Index 500 and Fidelity VIP Money Market Funds.

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OF
EMPLOYMENT OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

The following table provides information with respect to potential payments to the Company’s Named Executive Officers upon termination of their employment without cause by the Company or for good reason by the Named Executive Officers as these terms are defined in their respective employment agreements described under “Summary of Key Agreements” above. The table assumes a date of termination of December 31, 2009.

			Voluntary
			Termination for
	Voluntary		Good Reason or								Involuntary or Good
Executive Benefits and	Termination		Involuntary						Change in		Reason Termination
Payments upon	without		Termination				Death or		Control		upon or within
Termination	Good Reason		without Cause		Retirement(a)		Disability		(“CIC”)		24 months after CIC
Michael H. Lee
Cash Severance Payment(b)
Base Salary	$	—	$	2,700,000	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	2,700,000
Bonus		—		2,250,000		—		—		—		2,250,000
Pro-Rata Bonus(c)		900,000		900,000		—		900,000		—		900,000
Value of Unvested and Accelerated Equity Awards
Options		—		—		—		304,302		304,302		304,302
Restricted Stock		—		—		—		3,175,079		3,175,079		3,175,079
Present Value of Continuing Benefits(d)		—		60,122		—		—		—		60,122
Excise TaxGross-Up		—		—		—		—		—		2,631,171
Total	$	900,000	$	5,910,122	$	0	$	4,379,381	$	3,479,381	$	12,020,674

(a)	Mr. Lee is not retirement eligible as of 12/31/2009. Upon retirement, Mr. Lee is eligible for: (i) pro rata target bonus; (ii) retiree benefits, if any; (iii) all unvested equity will vest on the date of termination; and (iv) stock options will remain exercisable until the last day of the option term.
(b)	Severance payments equal to three times base salary plus three times highest annual bonus paid in the three fiscal years preceding CIC.
(c)	Represents pro-rata bonus equal to the target bonus opportunity in the fiscal year preceding CIC.
(d)	Represents three additional years of coverage for medical and life insurance.

35

			Voluntary
			Termination for
	Voluntary		Good Reason or								Involuntary or Good
Executive Benefits and	Termination		Involuntary						Change in		Reason Termination
Payments upon	without		Termination				Death or		Control		upon or within
Termination	Good Reason		without Cause		Retirement(a)		Disability		(‘‘CIC”)		24 months after CIC
Francis M. Colalucci
Cash Severance Payment(b)
Base Salary	$	—	$	361,725	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	361,725
Bonus		—		235,121		—		—		—		235,121
Pro-Rata Bonus(c)		—		235,121		235,121		235,121		—		235,121
Value of Unvested and Accelerated Equity Awards
Options		—		—		—		—		—		—
Restricted Stock		—		—		710,821		710,821		710,821		710,821
Present Value of Continuing Benefits(d)		—		14,308		—		—		—		14,308
Excise TaxGross-Up		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total	$	0	$	846,275	$	945,942	$	945,942	$	710,821	$	1,557,096

(a)	Mr. Colalucci has been eligible to retire since he reached age 62. Upon retirement, Mr. Colalucci is eligible for: (i) pro rata target bonus; (ii) retiree benefits, if any; (iii) all unvested equity will vest on the date of termination; and (iv) stock options will remain exercisable until the last day of the option term.
(b)	Severance payments equal to base salary plus target bonus in the fiscal year preceding CIC.
(c)	Represents pro-rata bonus equal to the target bonus opportunity in the fiscal year preceding CIC.
(d)	Represents one additional year of coverage for medical and life insurance.

			Voluntary
			Termination for
	Voluntary		Good Reason or								Involuntary or Good
Executive Benefits and	Termination		Involuntary						Change in		Reason Termination
Payments upon	without		Termination				Death or		Control		upon or within
Termination	Good Reason		without Cause		Retirement(a)		Disability		(‘‘CIC”)		24 months after CIC
Gary S. Maier
Cash Severance Payment(b)
Base Salary	$	—	$	338,000	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	338,000
Bonus		—		202,800		—		—		—		202,800
Pro-Rata Bonus(c)		—		202,800		—		202,800		—		202,800
Value of Unvested and Accelerated Equity Awards
Options		—		—		—		—		—		—
Restricted Stock		—		562,812		—		562,812		562,812		562,812
Present Value of Continuing Benefits(d)		—		20,041		—		—		—		20,041
Excise TaxGross-Up		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total	$	0	$	1,326,453	$	0	$	765,612	$	562,812	$	1,326,453

(a)	Mr. Maier is not retirement eligible as of 12/31/2009. Upon retirement, Mr. Maier is eligible for: (i) pro rata target bonus; (ii) retiree benefits, if any; (iii) all unvested equity will vest on the date of termination; and (iv) stock options will remain exercisable until the last day of the option term.
(b)	Severance payments equal to base salary plus target bonus in the fiscal year preceding CIC.
(c)	Represents pro-rata bonus equal to the target bonus opportunity in the fiscal year preceding CIC.
(d)	Represents one additional year of coverage for medical and life insurance.

36

			Voluntary
			Termination for
	Voluntary		Good Reason or								Involuntary or Good
Executive Benefits and	Termination		Involuntary						Change in		Reason Termination
Payments upon	without		Termination				Death or		Control		upon or within
Termination	Good Reason		without Cause		Retirement(a)		Disability		(‘‘CIC”)		24 months after CIC
Elliot S. Orol
Cash Severance Payment(b)
Base Salary	$	—	$	325,000	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	325,000
Bonus		—		130,000		—		—		—		130,000
Pro-Rata Bonus(c)		—		130,000		—		130,000		—		130,000
Value of Unvested and Accelerated Equity Awards
Options		—		—		—		—		—		—
Restricted Stock		—		—		—		467,381		467,381		467,381
Present Value of Continuing Benefits(d)		—		19,494		—		—		—		19,494
Excise TaxGross-Up		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total	$	0	$	604,494	$	0	$	597,381	$	467,381	$	1,071,875

(a)	Mr. Orol is not retirement eligible as of 12/31/2009. Upon retirement, Mr. Orol is eligible for: (i) pro rata target bonus; (ii) retiree benefits, if any; (iii) all unvested equity will vest on the date of termination; and (iv) stock options will remain exercisable until the last day of the option term.
(b)	Severance payments equal to base salary plus target bonus in the fiscal year preceding CIC.
(c)	Represents pro-rata bonus equal to the target bonus opportunity in the fiscal year preceding CIC.
(d)	Represents one additional year of coverage for medical and life insurance.

			Voluntary
			Termination for
	Voluntary		Good Reason or								Involuntary or Good
Executive Benefits and	Termination		Involuntary						Change in		Reason Termination
Payments upon	without		Termination				Death or		Control		upon or within
Termination	Good Reason		without Cause		Retirement(a)		Disability		(‘‘CIC”)		24 months after CIC
Joel S. Weiner
Cash Severance Payment(b)
Base Salary	$	—	$	340,200	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	340,200
Bonus		—		136,080		—		—		—		136,080
Pro-Rata Bonus(c)		—		136,080		—		136,080		—		136,080
Value of Unvested and Accelerated Equity Awards
Options		—		—		—		86,625		86,625		86,625
Restricted Stock		—		—		—		300,889		300,889		300,889
Present Value of Continuing Benefits(d)		—		14,308		—		—		—		14,308
Excise TaxGross-Up		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total	$	0	$	626,668	$	0	$	523,594	$	387,514	$	1,014,182

(a)	Mr. Weiner is not retirement eligible as of 12/31/2009. Upon retirement, Mr. Weiner is eligible for: (i) pro rata target bonus; (ii) retiree benefits, if any; (iii) all unvested equity will vest on the date of termination; and (iv) stock options will remain exercisable until the last day of the option term.
(b)	Severance payments equal to base salary plus target bonus in the fiscal year preceding CIC.
(c)	Represents pro-rata bonus equal to the target bonus opportunity in the fiscal year preceding CIC.
(d)	Represents one additional year of coverage for medical and life insurance.

COMPENSATION POLICIES AND PRACTICES AS THEY RELATE TO THE
COMPANY’S RISK MANAGEMENT

The Compensation Committee believes that the Company’s compensation policies and practices for all employees, including its executive officers, do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

37

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION FOR 2009

The following table sets forth the total compensation paid to each independent Board member in 2009.

	Fees Earned
	or Paid		Stock
Name	in Cash(2)		Awards(1)		Total
Charles A. Bryan	$	161,000	$	45,000	$	206,000
William W. Fox, Jr.		142,250		45,000		187,250
William A. Robbie		83,375		45,000		128,375
Steven W. Schuster		142,625		45,000		187,625
Robert S. Smith		79,750		45,000		124,750
Jan R. Van Gorder		68,000		45,000		113,000
Austin P. Young, III		159,000		45,000		204,000

(1)	The fair value reported is the average of the high and low price on the date of grant. The Company pays dividends on unvested outstanding restricted shares. As of December 31, 2009, Messrs. Bryan, Fox, Robbie, Schuster, Smith, Van Gorder and Young each held 1,830 restricted stock shares that will vest on April 1, 2010.
(2)	Includes payments for work done on the special committee of the Board for Messrs. Bryan, Fox, Schuster and Young of $40,500 each in connection with the merger, on February 5, 2009, of CastlePoint into the Company.

Independent Director Compensation

Directors’ compensation is intended to attract and retain well-qualified and dedicated independent directors. Fees paid to independent directors are designed to compensate Directors for time spent on Company matters. Stock-based awards are designed to align the Directors’ interests with those of the Company’s stockholders and to allow the Company to remain competitive with other companies in attracting and retaining well-qualified directors. In May 2009, the Board revised the compensation structure for independent Directors to provide for the payment of an annual retainer consisting of $36,000 in cash and $45,000 in restricted stock, which vests on the first anniversary of the date of grant. Each Director is also paid $8,000 for eachtwo-day set of quarterly Board and committee meetings, and $11,000 for eachthree-day set of quarterly Board and committee meetings, that he attends in person. For attendance at each Board meeting other than the four quarterly meetings, each Director receives $2,000. For each committee meeting other than the four quarterly meetings, each Audit Committee member receives $1,500 and each member of the Compensation Committee, Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and Investment Committee receives $1,000. In addition, the Audit Committee chairman receives an annual fee of $15,000, the Compensation Committee chairman receives an annual fee of $11,500, and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and Investment Committee chairmen each receive an annual fee of $9,000. Effective as of the date of the 2010 Annual Meeting, the Board has increased to $20,000 the annual fee for the Audit Committee chairman. Directors are reimbursed for expenses of traveling to and from Board and committee meetings. In addition to the standing committees described above, the Board also creates special or temporary committees to address certain unique issues or transactions as the Board deems appropriate. The fees for the special committees can vary depending on the effort and time commitment required of the committee members. The fees paid in 2009 to Messrs. Bryan, Fox, Schuster and Young for participation on the special committee established by the Board in 2008 in connection with the negotiation of the merger on February 5, 2009 of CastlePoint into the Company are included in the Director Compensation table above.

38

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Audit Committee (the “Committee”) has been appointed by the Board of Directors to assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its responsibility to oversee the financial affairs, risk management with respect to financial, audit, accounting and internal control matters, accounting and financial reporting processes and audits of the financial statements of the Company. The Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors and reviewed annually by the Committee. The charter is available on the Company’s website atwww.twrgrp.com. The Committee has furnished the following report for 2009.

Management has the primary responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate internal financial control for preparing the financial statements and for the public reporting process. Johnson Lambert & Co. LLP, the Company’s 2009 independent registered public accounting firm, is responsible for expressing its opinions on the conformity of the Company’s audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles and on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

The Committee has reviewed and discussed with management and with the independent registered public accounting firm the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009 and Johnson Lambert & Co. LLP’s evaluation of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Committee has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by the standards adopted or referenced by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) and SECRule 2-07, Communications with Audit Committees, as currently in effect.

The Committee has received the written disclosures and letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s communications with the Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm that firm’s independence. The Committee has also considered the compatibility of the provision for non-audit services with the independent registered public accounting firm’s independence.

Based on the Committee’s reviews and discussions referred to above, the Committee recommended that the Board of Directors include the audited consolidated financial statements in the Company’s annual report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

This report is provided by the following independent directors, who constitute the Committee:

Austin P. Young, III, Chairman

Charles A. Bryan

William W. Fox, Jr.

William A. Robbie

39

PRE-APPROVAL POLICY FOR SERVICES OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT

The Audit Committee is required to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm, both as to the permissibility of the auditors performing such services and the amount of fees to be paid in connection therewith, subject to certainde minimis exceptions for which the Audit Committee’s approval is required before completion of the audit. The Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to one or more of its members when appropriate, provided that the decisions of such members to grant pre-approvals shall be presented to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. Policies and procedures for the pre-approval of audit and permissible non-audit services must be detailed as to the particular service. The Audit Committee must be informed of each service rendered pursuant to any such policies or procedures.

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT’S FEES

The aggregate fees billed for professional services by Johnson Lambert & Co. LLP in 2009 and 2008 for these various services were:

Type of Fees	2009(1)		2008
Audit fees	$	2,694,000	$	1,955,000
Audit-related fees		40,000		46,000
Tax fees		—		—
All other fees		—		—
Total	$	2,734,000	$	2,001,000

⁽¹⁾ Estimate

In the above table, in accordance with the SEC’s definitions and rules, “Audit fees” are fees andout-of-pocket expenses that are billed or expected to be billed by Johnson Lambert & Co. LLP for the audit of annual financial statements included in theForm 10-K, the review of financial statements included in theForm 10-Qs, the audit of internal control in compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the review of comfort letters, the preparation of consents and the completion of statutory audits.

“Audit-related fees” are fees billed for employee benefit plan audits. “Tax fees” are fees billed for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. “All other fees” are for any services not included in the first three categories.

The Audit Committee retained Johnson Lambert & Co. LLP to audit the consolidated financial statements and internal controls over financial reporting for 2009. In addition, the Audit Committee retained Johnson Lambert & Co. LLP as well as other accounting firms to provide other auditing and advisory services in 2009. When Johnson Lambert & Co. LLP’s proposed services are consistent with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules on auditor independence and other applicable laws, the Audit Committee considers whether Johnson Lambert & Co. LLP is best positioned to provide these services efficiently. The Audit Committee has also adopted procedures to pre-approve all non-audit related work performed by Johnson Lambert & Co. LLP. Specifically, the Audit Committee has pre-approved the use of Johnson Lambert & Co. LLP to perform procedures with respect to the Company’s registration statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

40

2.   RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Subject to the stockholders’ ratification, the Audit Committee has, as a result of a competitive process conducted by the Committee to select the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2010, appointed the firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2010. If the stockholders do not ratify this appointment by the affirmative vote of a majority of shares present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting, other independent registered public accounting firms will be considered by the Audit Committee.

A representative of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement if the representative desires to do so. A representative of Johnson Lambert & Co. LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2009, is also expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement if the representative desires to do so. Each representative is also expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.

The Board of Directors Recommendation.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” this proposal.

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

Any stockholder proposal intended to be presented at the 2011 Annual Meeting must be received at the Company’s principal executive office by November 23, 2010 for consideration for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement and form of proxy related to that meeting. The proposal must comply in all respects with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

41

VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. TOWER GROUP, INC. 120 BROADWAY,31ST FLOOR NEW YORK, NY 10271 TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. For Withhold For All To withhold authority to vote for any All All Except individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the The Board of Directors recommends that you nominee(s) on the line below. vote FOR the following: 0 0 0 1. Election of Directors Nominees 01 Charles A. Bryan 02 Robert S. Smith The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal(s): For Against Abstain 2 Ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 0 0 0 year 2010. 3 Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof. 0 0 0 For address change/comments, mark here. 0 R2.09.05.010 (see reverse for instructions) _1 Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as 0000052742 attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name, by authorized officer. Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Notice & Proxy Statement, Form 10-K, Annual Report is/are available at www.proxyvote.com . TOWER GROUP, INC. Annual Meeting of Stockholders May 12, 2010 This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors The undersigned hereby appoints Michael H. Lee, William E. Hitselberger and Elliot S. Orol, and each of them, proxies, with full power of substitution in each of them, for and on behalf of the undersigned to vote as proxies, as directed and permitted herein, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Tower Group, Inc. to be held at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time, on Wednesday, May 12, 2010, at the Millenium Hilton Hotel, 55 Church Street, New York, NY 10007, and at any adjournments thereof upon matters set forth in the Proxy Statement and, in their judgment and discretion, upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting. ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS MAY 12, 2010 When properly executed, your proxy will be voted as you indicate, or where no contrary indication is made, will be voted FOR Proposals 1 and 2. The full text of the proposals and the position of the Board of Directors on each appear in the Proxy Statement and should be reviewed prior to voting. R2.09.05.010 Address change/comments: _2 0000052742 (If you noted any Address Changes and/or Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.) Continued and to be signed on reverse side