Proved undeveloped reserves are those reserves expected to be recovered from known accumulations where a significant expenditure (for example, when compared to the cost of drilling a well) is required to render them capable of production. These reserves have a 90% probability of being recovered. Vermilion's current plan is to develop these reserves in the following two years. This timetable may be altered depending on outside market forces, changes in capital allocations and impact of future acquisitions and dispositions.
Probable undeveloped reserves are those reserves expected to be recovered from known accumulations where a significant expenditure (for example, when compared to the cost of drilling a well) is required to render them capable of production. These reserves have a 50% probability of being recovered. Vermilion's current plan is to develop these reserves over the next five years. In general, development of these reserves requires additional evaluation data to increase the probability of success to an acceptable level for Vermilion. This increases the timeline for the development of these reserves. This timetable may be altered depending on outside market forces, changes in capital allocations and impact of future acquisitions and dispositions.
Future Development Costs
The table below sets out the future development costs deducted in estimation of future net revenue attributable to proved reserves and proved plus probable reserves (using forecast prices and costs and calculated without discount).
(M$) | Total Proved Estimated Using Forecast Prices and Costs | Total Proved Plus Probable Estimated Using Forecast Prices and Costs |
Australia | | |
2011 | 3,900 | 13,400 |
2012 | 3,978 | 3,978 |
2013 | 4,058 | 4,058 |
2014 | 4,139 | 4,139 |
2015 | 4,221 | 4,221 |
Remainder | 8,698 | 8,698 |
Total for all years undiscounted | 28,994 | 38,494 |
Canada | | |
2011 | 96,652 | 136,536 |
2012 | 100,509 | 150,316 |
2013 | 39,691 | 126,434 |
2014 | 48,464 | 120,619 |
2015 | 1,876 | 2,312 |
Remainder | 14,530 | 15,443 |
Total for all years undiscounted | 301,722 | 551,660 |
France | | |
2011 | 12,017 | 30,961 |
2012 | 19,810 | 44,980 |
2013 | 18,325 | 61,833 |
2014 | 4,036 | 31,426 |
2015 | 4,116 | 4,184 |
Remainder | 21,133 | 22,192 |
Total for all years undiscounted | 79,436 | 195,575 |
Ireland | | |
2011 | 107,615 | 107,615 |
2012 | 87,615 | 87,615 |
2013 | 54,672 | 54,672 |
2014 | 1,290 | 1,290 |
2015 | 1,315 | 1,315 |
Remainder | 8,444 | 8,456 |
Total for all years undiscounted | 260,950 | 260,962 |
Netherlands | | |
2011 | 5,219 | 5,219 |
2012 | 1,849 | 4,073 |
2013 | 755 | 11,371 |
2014 | 770 | 770 |
2015 | 785 | 785 |
Remainder | 1,618 | 1,618 |
Total for all years undiscounted | 10,996 | 23,836 |
Total Company | | |
2011 | 225,403 | 293,731 |
2012 | 213,762 | 290,962 |
2013 | 117,499 | 258,367 |
2014 | 58,698 | 158,242 |
2015 | 12,314 | 12,817 |
Remainder | 54,422 | 56,407 |
Total for all years undiscounted | 682,098 | 1,070,527 |
Vermilion expects to source its capital expenditure requirements from internally generated cash flow and, as appropriate, from debt or equity financing. It is anticipated that costs of funding the future development costs will not impact development of its properties or Vermilion’s reserves or future net revenue.
Oil and Gas Properties and Wells
The following table sets forth the number of wells in which Vermilion held a working interest as at December 31, 2010:
| Oil | Natural Gas |
Gross(1) Wells | Net(2) Wells | Gross(1) Wells | Net(2) Wells |
Australia | | | | |
Producing | 18 | 18 | - | - |
Non-producing | - | - | - | - |
Canada | | | | |
Producing | 476 | 178 | 576 | 393 |
Non-producing | 180 | 57 | 99 | 67 |
France | | | | |
Producing | 217 | 190 | - | - |
Non-producing | 163 | 143 | - | - |
Ireland | | | | |
Producing | - | - | - | - |
Non-producing | - | - | 7 | 1 |
Netherlands | | | | |
Producing | - | - | 47 | 37 |
Non-producing | - | - | 26 | 20 |
Total Producing | 711 | 386 | 623 | 430 |
Total Non-producing | 343 | 200 | 132 | 88 |
(1) | "Gross" refers to the total wells in which Vermilion has an interest, directly or indirectly. |
(2) | "Net" refers to the total wells in which Vermilion has an interest, directly or indirectly, multiplied by the percentage working interest owned by Vermilion, directly or indirectly, therein. |
(3) | Well counts are based on wellbores. |
Costs Incurred
The following table summarizes the capital expenditures made by Vermilion on oil and natural gas properties for the year ended December 31, 2010:
(M$) | Property Acquisition Costs | Exploration | Development | Total |
| Proved Properties | Unproved Properties | Costs | Costs | Costs |
Australia | - | - | 499 | 50,958 | 51,457 |
Canada | 448 | 97,215 | 5,126 | 140,111 | 242,900 |
France | 6,207 | - | 411 | 48,347 | 54,965 |
Ireland | - | - | 187 | 78,311 | 78,498 |
Netherlands | - | - | 377 | 10,640 | 11,017 |
Total | 6,655 | 97,215 | 6,600 | 328,367 | 438,837 |
Exploration and Development Activities
The following table sets forth the number of development and exploration wells which Vermilion completed during its 2010 financial year:
| Exploration Wells | Development Wells |
| Gross(1) | Net(2) | Gross(1) | Net(2) |
Australia | | | | |
Oil | - | - | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Gas | - | - | - | - |
Standing | - | - | - | - |
Dry Holes | - | - | - | - |
Total Completed | - | - | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Canada | | | | |
Oil | - | - | 28.0 | 18.9 |
Gas | - | - | 5.0 | 3.4 |
Standing | - | - | 22.0 | 17.7 |
Dry Holes | - | - | - | - |
Total Completed | - | - | 55.0 | 40.0 |
France | | | | |
Oil | - | - | - | - |
Gas | - | - | - | - |
Service | - | - | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Standing | - | - | - | - |
Dry Holes | - | - | - | - |
Total Completed | - | - | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Ireland | | | | |
Oil | - | - | - | - |
Gas | - | - | - | - |
Standing | - | - | - | - |
Dry Holes | - | - | - | - |
Total Completed | - | - | - | - |
Netherlands | | | | |
Oil | - | - | - | - |
Gas | - | - | - | - |
Standing | 1.0 | 0.4 | - | - |
Dry Holes | - | - | - | - |
Total Completed | 1.0 | 0.4 | | |
Total Company | | | | |
Oil | - | - | 31.0 | 21.9 |
Gas | - | - | 5.0 | 3.4 |
Service | - | - | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Standing | 1.0 | 0.4 | 22.0 | 17.7 |
Dry Holes | - | - | - | - |
Total Completed | 1.0 | 0.4 | 59.0 | 44.0 |
Notes:
(1) | "Gross" refers to the total wells in which Vermilion has an interest, directly or indirectly. |
(2) | "Net" refers to the total wells in which Vermilion has an interest, directly or indirectly, multiplied by the percentage working interest owned by Vermilion, directly or indirectly therein. |
Vermilion has currently budgeted $461 million for its 2011 capital program in Australia, Canada, France, Ireland and the Netherlands. The funds will be used to drill wells to develop reserves in its Canadian key area, the Cardium play in Drayton Valley, Central Alberta, and in Australia, France, Ireland and the Netherlands. A portion of the capital will be allocated to workovers, production optimization, and maintenance capital in each country.
Properties with No Attributed Reserves
The following table sets out Vermilion's undeveloped land as at December 31, 2010:
| Undeveloped Land |
Country | Gross Acres(1) | Net Acres(2) |
Australia | - | - |
Canada | 258,277 | 169,905 |
France | 900,864 | 879,491 |
Ireland | 57,531 | 10,643 |
Netherlands | 430,784 | 267,695 |
Total | 1,647,456 | 1,327,734 |
Notes:
(1) | "Gross" refers to the total acres in which Vermilion has an interest, directly or indirectly. |
(2) | "Net" refers to the total acres in which Vermilion has an interest, directly or indirectly, multiplied by the percentage working interest owned by Vermilion, directly or indirectly therein. |
Vermilion expects its rights to explore, develop and exploit approximately 29,307 net acres in Canada and 108,599 net acres in France to expire within one year. In the Netherlands, Ireland and Australia, no such rights expire within one year.
Abandonment and Reclamation Costs
Vermilion has estimated its abandonment costs by determining amounts for facility decommissioning and reclamation costs (including salvage) by area in Australia, Canada, France, Ireland and the Netherlands. As well, Vermilion has determined abandonment costs (including salvage) and reclamation costs per well, by area and applied this amount to its net wells in each of the countries. The number of net wells to be abandoned is 1,226 in Canada, 389 in France, 59 in the Netherlands, 20 in Australia and one in Ireland.
The total amount of costs, net of salvage, as estimated in the GLJ Report, is set forth in the following table:
Country | Undiscounted (M$) | Discounted 10% (M$) |
Australia | 37,527 | 13,354 |
Canada | 32,191 | 10,551 |
France | 76,450 | 20,677 |
Ireland | 20,767 | 7,634 |
Netherlands | 12,328 | 8,055 |
Total | 179,263 | 60,271 |
In estimating the future net revenue, it is important to note that future costs associated with abandonment of surface facilities, well site reclamation, pipeline abandonments, non-producing wells and reclamation costs, not including downhole costs listed above, are estimated by management of the Company as:
Country | Facilities Undiscounted (M$) | Discounted 10% (M$) |
Australia | 210,687 | 18,006 |
Canada | 154,544 | 56,082 |
France | 223,196 | 15,847 |
Ireland | 10,295 | 3,253 |
Netherlands | 161,173 | 66,651 |
Total | 759,895 | 159,839 |
In the next three years, as estimated in the GLJ Report, Vermilion expects to pay abandonment and reclamation costs of:
Country | Undiscounted (M$) | Discounted 10% (M$) |
Australia | 4,485 | 3,576 |
Canada | 2,714 | 2,396 |
France | 3,867 | 3,205 |
Ireland | - | - |
Netherlands | 3,687 | 3,062 |
Total | 14,753 | 12,239 |
Tax Information
In Canada, the Company is subject to normal corporate tax rates on its taxable income. It is not expected to have Canadian taxes payable in the immediate future as there are sufficient tax pools available to reduce future taxable income, subject to changes in the business model or significant increases to commodity prices.
In France, the Company is currently subject to an approximate 35% corporate tax rate after eligible deductions. In the Netherlands, the Company is currently subject to an approximate 45% corporate tax rate after eligible deductions. In Australia, the Company is currently subject to an approximate 30% corporate tax rate after eligible deductions in addition to Petroleum Resource Rent Tax which is approximately 40%. Ireland is subject to tax at 25% after eligible deductions.
Production Estimates
The following table sets forth the volume of production estimated for the first year as reflected in the estimates of gross proved reserves and gross proved plus probable reserves:
| Light and Medium Oil | Heavy Oil | Natural Gas | Natural Gas Liquids | BOE |
| (Bbl/d) | (Bbl/d) | (Mcf/d) | (Bbl/d) | (Bbl/d) |
Australia | | | | | |
Proved | 6,765 | - | - | - | 6,765 |
Proved Plus Probable | 7,815 | - | - | - | 7,815 |
Canada | | | | | |
Proved | 3,540 | 12 | 39,062 | 1,327 | 11,389 |
Proved Plus Probable | 4,199 | 12 | 42,255 | 1,469 | 12,723 |
France | | | | | |
Proved | 8,001 | - | 2,464 | - | 8,411 |
Proved Plus Probable | 8,468 | - | 2,494 | - | 8,883 |
Ireland | | | | | |
Proved | - | - | - | - | - |
Proved Plus Probable | - | - | - | - | - |
Netherlands | | | | | |
Proved | - | - | 26,944 | 38 | 4,528 |
Proved Plus Probable | - | - | 30,555 | 42 | 5,135 |
Total Proved | 18,305 | 12 | 68,470 | 1,365 | 31,093 |
Total Proved Plus Probable | 20,482 | 12 | 75,304 | 1,512 | 34,556 |
Production History
The following table sets forth certain information in respect of production, product prices received, royalties, production costs and netbacks received by Vermilion for each quarter of its most recently completed financial year. Vermilion had no production from its Ireland assets in 2010. Light and medium oil in the following table includes any amounts generated by the sale of heavy oil and is deemed to be immaterial by Vermilion.
| Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended |
| March 31, 2010 | June 30, 2010 | September 30, 2010 | December 31, 2010 |
Australia | | | | |
Average Daily Production | | | | |
Light and Medium Oil (Bbl/d) | 7,094 | 6,522 | 6,225 | 9,561 |
Natural Gas (MMcf/d) | - | - | - | - |
Natural Gas Liquids (Bbl/d) | - | - | - | - |
Average Net Prices Received | | | | |
Light and Medium Oil ($/Bbl) | 83.14 | 77.76 | 77.98 | 86.23 |
Natural Gas ($/Mcf) | - | - | - | - |
Natural Gas Liquids ($/Bbl) | - | - | - | - |
Royalties | | | | |
Light and Medium Oil ($/Bbl) | 23.42 | 6.10 | 4.85 | 20.68 |
Natural Gas ($/Mcf) | - | - | - | - |
Natural Gas Liquids ($/Bbl) | - | - | - | - |
Transportation | | | | |
Light and Medium Oil ($/Bbl) | - | - | - | - |
Natural Gas ($/Mcf) | - | - | - | - |
Natural Gas Liquids ($/Bbl) | - | - | - | - |
Production Costs | | | | |
Light and Medium Oil ($/Bbl) | 17.84 | 16.36 | 17.38 | 12.48 |
Natural Gas ($/Mcf) | - | - | - | - |
Natural Gas Liquids ($/Bbl) | - | - | - | - |
Netback Received | | | | |
Light and Medium Oil ($/Bbl) | 41.88 | 55.30 | 55.75 | 53.07 |
Natural Gas ($/Mcf) | - | - | - | - |
Natural Gas Liquids ($/Bbl) | - | - | - | - |
Canada | | | | |
Average Daily Production | | | | |
Light and Medium Oil (Bbl/d) | 2,012 | 2,718 | 2,890 | 3,473 |
Natural Gas (MMcf/d) | 46.99 | 44.24 | 42.17 | 42.33 |
Natural Gas Liquids (Bbl/d) | 1,670 | 1,342 | 1,314 | 1,386 |
Average Net Prices Received | | | | |
Light and Medium Oil ($/Bbl) | 81.38 | 75.90 | 74.19 | 81.20 |
Natural Gas ($/Mcf) | 5.46 | 4.35 | 4.26 | 4.00 |
Natural Gas Liquids ($/Bbl) | 67.17 | 63.26 | 61.52 | 63.29 |
Royalties | | | | |
Light and Medium Oil ($/Bbl) | 11.83 | 5.06 | 5.43 | 4.88 |
Natural Gas ($/Mcf) | 0.73 | 0.03 | 0.27 | 0.02 |
Natural Gas Liquids ($/Bbl) | 14.31 | 3.19 | 3.71 | 3.80 |
Transportation | | | | |
Light and Medium Oil ($/Bbl) | 2.00 | 1.76 | 1.68 | 1.47 |
Natural Gas ($/Mcf) | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.22 |
Natural Gas Liquids ($/Bbl) | 1.79 | 2.72 | 1.43 | 2.04 |
Production Costs | | | | |
Light and Medium Oil ($/Bbl) | 15.57 | 10.45 | 11.40 | 10.30 |
Natural Gas ($/Mcf) | 1.49 | 1.44 | 1.75 | 1.89 |
Natural Gas Liquids ($/Bbl) | 4.64 | 5.24 | 6.20 | 6.39 |
Netback Received | | | | |
Light and Medium Oil ($/Bbl) | 51.98 | 58.63 | 55.68 | 64.55 |
Natural Gas ($/Mcf) | 3.03 | 2.66 | 2.02 | 1.87 |
Natural Gas Liquids ($/Bbl) | 46.43 | 52.11 | 50.18 | 51.06 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a94e3/a94e3a785eb33b025773b61375b006069f979732" alt="Graphic"
France | | | | |
Average Daily Production | | | | |
Light and Medium Oil (Bbl/d) | 7,900 | 8,397 | 8,542 | 8,539 |
Natural Gas (MMcf/d) | 0.94 | 0.45 | 1.19 | 1.10 |
Natural Gas Liquids (Bbl/d) | - | - | - | - |
Average Net Prices Received | | | | |
Light and Medium Oil ($/Bbl) | 78.06 | 79.93 | 78.87 | 85.53 |
Natural Gas ($/Mcf) | 9.02 | 8.94 | 9.50 | 10.93 |
Natural Gas Liquids ($/Bbl) | - | - | - | - |
Royalties | | | | |
Light and Medium Oil ($/Bbl) | 5.33 | 5.31 | 4.90 | 5.40 |
Natural Gas ($/Mcf) | (0.09) | 0.27 | 0.25 | 0.27 |
Natural Gas Liquids ($/Bbl) | - | - | - | - |
Transportation | | | | |
Light and Medium Oil ($/Bbl) | 3.86 | 3.71 | 3.28 | 3.15 |
Natural Gas ($/Mcf) | - | - | - | - |
Natural Gas Liquids ($/Bbl) | - | - | - | - |
Production Costs | | | | |
Light and Medium Oil ($/Bbl) | 14.65 | 13.14 | 13.71 | 13.23 |
Natural Gas ($/Mcf) | 5.19 | 6.94 | 3.55 | 7.56 |
Natural Gas Liquids ($/Bbl) | - | - | - | - |
Netback Received | | | | |
Light and Medium Oil ($/Bbl) | 54.22 | 57.77 | 56.98 | 63.75 |
Natural Gas ($/Mcf) | 3.92 | 1.73 | 5.70 | 3.10 |
Natural Gas Liquids ($/Bbl) | - | - | - | - |
Netherlands | | | | |
Average Daily Production | | | | |
Light and Medium Oil (Bbl/d) | - | - | - | - |
Natural Gas (MMcf/d) | 20.97 | 31.35 | 30.32 | 30.47 |
Natural Gas Liquids (Bbl/d) | 25 | 44 | 46 | 26 |
Average Net Prices Received | | | | |
Light and Medium Oil ($/Bbl) | - | - | - | - |
Natural Gas ($/Mcf) | 6.49 | 6.18 | 7.39 | 7.97 |
Natural Gas Liquids ($/Bbl) | 22.70 | 76.05 | 58.65 | 131.14 |
Royalties | | | | |
Light and Medium Oil ($/Bbl) | - | - | - | - |
Natural Gas ($/Mcf) | - | - | - | - |
Natural Gas Liquids ($/Bbl) | - | - | - | - |
Production Costs | | | | |
Light and Medium Oil ($/Bbl) | - | - | - | - |
Natural Gas ($/Mcf) | 2.26 | 1.26 | 1.56 | 2.14 |
Natural Gas Liquids ($/Bbl) | - | - | - | - |
Netback Received | | | | |
Light and Medium Oil ($/Bbl) | - | - | - | - |
Natural Gas ($/Mcf) | 4.23 | 4.92 | 5.83 | 5.83 |
Natural Gas Liquids ($/Bbl) | 22.70 | 76.05 | 58.65 | 131.14 |
Total | | | | |
Average Daily Production | | | | |
Light and Medium Oil (Bbl/d) | 17,006 | 17,637 | 17,658 | 21,573 |
Natural Gas (MMcf/d) | 68.90 | 76.04 | 73.68 | 73.90 |
Natural Gas Liquids (Bbl/d) | 1,695 | 1,386 | 1,360 | 1,412 |
Average Net Prices Received | | | | |
Light and Medium Oil ($/Bbl) | 80.57 | 78.51 | 77.79 | 85.14 |
Natural Gas ($/Mcf) | 5.82 | 5.13 | 5.64 | 5.74 |
Natural Gas Liquids ($/Bbl) | 66.51 | 63.67 | 61.42 | 64.55 |
Royalties | | | | |
Light and Medium Oil ($/Bbl) | 14.11 | 6.67 | 5.81 | 13.53 |
Natural Gas ($/Mcf) | 0.50 | 0.02 | 0.16 | 0.01 |
Natural Gas Liquids ($/Bbl) | 22.37 | 18.35 | 19.49 | 19.97 |
Transportation Costs | | | | |
Light and Medium Oil ($/Bbl) | 2.03 | 2.04 | 1.86 | 1.48 |
Natural Gas ($/Mcf) | 0.15 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 |
Natural Gas Liquids ($/Bbl) | 1.77 | 2.63 | 1.38 | 2.00 |
Production Costs | | | | |
Light and Medium Oil ($/Bbl) | 16.08 | 13.91 | 14.62 | 12.43 |
Natural Gas ($/Mcf) | 1.78 | 1.40 | 1.70 | 2.08 |
Natural Gas Liquids ($/Bbl) | 4.57 | 5.07 | 5.99 | 6.27 |
Netback Received | | | | |
Light and Medium Oil ($/Bbl) | 48.34 | 55.89 | 55.50 | 57.70 |
Natural Gas ($/Mcf) | 3.39 | 3.58 | 3.65 | 3.52 |
Natural Gas Liquids ($/Bbl) | 37.80 | 37.62 | 34.56 | 36.31 |
Marketing
The nature of Vermilion’s operations results in exposure to fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. Vermilion monitors and, when appropriate, uses derivative financial instruments to manage its exposure to these risks. All transactions of this nature entered into by Vermilion are related to an underlying financial position or to future petroleum and natural gas production. Vermilion does not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes. Vermilion has elected to not designate any of its price risk management activities as accounting hedges and thus accounts for changes to fair value in net earnings for the period. During the normal course of business, Vermilion enters into fixed price arrangements to sell a portion of its production. Vermilion has elected to exempt these contracts from fair value accounting through the use of the normal purchase and sales exemption. Vermilion does not obtain collateral or other security to support its financial derivatives as management reviews the creditworthiness of the counterparty prior to entering into a derivative contract.
The following table summarizes Vermilion’s outstanding financial derivative positions as at December 31, 2010.
Risk Management: Oil | Funded Cost | Bbl/d | US $/Bbl |
Collar - WTI | | | |
January 2011 to June 2011 | US $1.00/bbl | 2,400 | $ 80.00 - $107.60 |
January 2011 to June 2011 | US $1.00/bbl | 2,400 | $ 75.00 - $ 97.85 |
January 2011 to December 2011 | US $1.00/bbl | 500 | $ 78.00 - $ 96.20 |
January 2011 to December 2011 | US $1.00/bbl | 500 | $ 78.00 - $ 96.25 |
July 2011 to December 2011 | US $1.00/bbl | 2,400 | $ 80.00 - $110.00 |
July 2011 to December 2011 | US $1.00/bbl | 2,400 | $ 77.25 - $ 98.50 |
Collar – BRENT | | | |
January 2011 to December 2011 | US $1.00/bbl | 1,000 | $ 77.75 - $ 96.00 |
January 2011 to December 2011 | US $1.00/bbl | 1,000 | $ 77.50 - $ 96.00 |
January 2011 to December 2011 | US $0.00/bbl | 750 | $ 77.00 - $ 95.40 |
January 2011 to December 2011 | US $1.00/bbl | 750 | $ 78.00 - $ 98.10 |
January 2011 to December 2011 | US $1.00/bbl | 500 | $ 78.00 - $100.00 |
January 2011 to December 2011 | US $1.00/bbl | 500 | $ 78.00 - $100.05 |
January 2011 to December 2011 | US $1.00/bbl | 500 | $ 78.00 - $100.00 |
January 2012 to June 2012 | US $1.00/bbl | 750 | $ 82.00 - $105.60 |
January 2012 to June 2012 | US $1.00/bbl | 750 | $ 82.00 - $104.80 |
January 2012 to June 2012 | US $1.00/bbl | 750 | $ 82.00 - $106.10 |
Call Spread – BRENT | | | |
January 2011 to December 2011 | US $6.08/bbl 1 | 960 | $ 65.00 - $ 85.00 |
January 2011 to December 2011 | US $5.15/bbl 1 | 600 | $ 65.00 - $ 85.00 |
Risk Management: Natural Gas | Funded Cost | GJ/d | $/Bbl |
SWAP – AECO | | | |
January 2011 to October 2011 | $0.00/GJ | 700 | $ 5.13 |
Risk Management: Foreign Exchange | | Notional Principal ($US) Per Month | Fixed Rate ($CDN / $US) |
US Dollar Forward Sale | | | |
January 2011 to December 2011 | | $750,000 | $1.07 |
January 2011 to December 2011 | | $750,000 | $1.07 |
1 The funded amounts for these instruments were paid in a prior period.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RESPECTING VERMILION ENERGY INC.
Management
Vermilion has a board of directors currently consisting of seven individuals. The directors are elected by the Company at the direction of Shareholders by ordinary resolution, and hold office until the Meeting. As at March 7, 2011, the directors and officers of Vermilion, as a group, beneficially owned, or controlled or directed, directly or indirectly, 7,333,061 common shares representing approximately 8.2% of the issued and outstanding common shares.
The following table sets forth certain information respecting the current directors and officers of Vermilion. References to Vermilion in the following table for dates prior to the Conversion Arrangement refer to VRL and to the Company following the date of the Conversion Arrangement.
Directors Name and Municipality of Residence | Office Held | Year First Elected or Appointed as Director | Principal Occupation During the Past Five Years |
Lorenzo Donadeo Calgary, Alberta, Canada | President and Chief Executive Officer and Director | 1994 | Since 2003, President and Chief Executive Officer of Vermilion |
W. Kenneth Davidson (2)(3) Oakville, Ontario, Canada | Director | 2005 | Since 2000, Director of Millar Western Forest Products Ltd., a private forest products company From 2009 until February 2011, Director of Realex Properties Corp., a public real estate company |
Claudio A. Ghersinich (2)(4)(5) Calgary, Alberta, Canada | Director | 1994 | Since 2005, President of Carrera Investments Corp., a private investment company |
Joseph F. Killi (2)(3) Calgary, Alberta, Canada | Director | 1999 | From January 2011, Executive Chairman of Parkbridge Lifestyle Communities Inc., a private real estate company From 2005 until January 2011, Executive Chairman of Parkbridge Lifestyle Communities Inc., a public real estate company From 2005 until February 2011, Vice Chairman of Realex Properties Corp., a public real estate company Since 1993, President of Rosebridge Capital Corp. Inc., a private real estate investment company |
Larry J. Macdonald (1)(2)(3)(4)(5) Okotoks, Alberta, Canada | Director and Chairman of the Board | 2002 | Since 2003, Chairman & Chief Executive Officer and a director of Point Energy Ltd., a private oil and gas company Since 2003, Managing Director of Northpoint Energy Ltd., a private oil and gas company |
William F. Madison (2)(4)(5) Sugar Land, Texas, USA | Director | 2004 | From 1999 to 2006, a director of Montana Tech Foundation, serving as Chairman during 2004 and 2005 Since 2007, Director of Canadian Oil Recovery and Remediation Enterprise, Inc., a public oil recovery and remediation company |
Timothy R. Marchant (3)(4)(5) Calgary, Alberta, Canada | Director | 2010 | 2009 to present, adjunct professor, Haskayne School of Business 2007 to 2009, Vice President, Middle East Business Development for BP International 2004 to 2007, President, BP Kuwait |
Notes: (1) Chairman of the Board (2) Member of the Audit Committee (3) Member of the Governance and Human Resources Committee (4) Member of the Health, Safety and Environment Committee (5) Member of the Independent Reserves Committee |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a94e3/a94e3a785eb33b025773b61375b006069f979732" alt="Graphic"
Officers Name and Municipality of Residence | Office Held | Principal Occupation During the Past Five Years |
John D. Donovan Calgary, Alberta, Canada | Executive Vice President Business Development | Since 2005, Executive Vice President, Business Development of Vermilion |
Curtis W. Hicks Calgary, Alberta, Canada | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | Since 2004, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Vermilion |
G.R. (Bob) Mac Dougall Calgary, Alberta, Canada | Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer | Since 2006, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Vermilion 2004 to 2006, Chief Operating Officer of Vermilion |
Paul Beique Calgary, Alberta, Canada | Vice President Capital Markets | Since 2008, Vice President Capital Markets of Vermilion 2003 to 2008, Director Investor Relations of Vermilion |
Mona Jasinski Calgary, Alberta, Canada | Vice President People | Since 2009, Vice President People of Vermilion 2004 to 2009, HR Manager, Shell Onshore Production, North America |
Raj C. Patel Calgary, Alberta, Canada | Vice President Marketing | Since 2001, Vice President, Marketing of Vermilion |
Peter Sider Biscarrosse, France | Vice President European Operations | Since July 2009, Vice President European Operations March 2008 to July 2009, Regional General Manager, European Operations 2006 to March 2008, Managing Director of Vermilion Oil & Gas Netherlands B.V., a subsidiary of the Company 1999 to 2006, founder of four private and public oil and gas companies in Alberta including Resolution Resources, EMBO Petroleum, Newheart Oil and Gas and Breakside Energy |
Robert J. Engbloom, Q.C. Calgary, Alberta, Canada | Corporate Secretary | Since 1999, partner with Macleod Dixon LLP, a law firm |
Common Shares
Each common share entitles the holder to receive notice of and to attend all meetings of the shareholders of the Company and to one vote at such meetings. The holders of common shares will be, at the discretion of the board and subject to applicable legal restrictions, entitled to receive any dividends declared by the board on the common shares. The holders of common shares will be entitled to share equally in any distribution of the assets of the Company upon the liquidation, dissolution, bankruptcy or winding-up of the Company or other distribution of its assets among the Shareholders for the purpose of winding-up its affairs.
Cash Dividends
The Company expects to pay dividends on a monthly basis in a manner similar to the former approach of the Trust relating to distributions. However, all decisions with respect to the declaration of dividends on the common shares will be made by the board on the basis of the Company's earnings, financial requirements and other conditions existing at such future time, planned acquisitions, income tax payable by the Company, crude oil and natural gas prices and access to capital markets, as well as the satisfaction of solvency tests imposed by the ABCA on corporations for the declaration and payment of dividends. It is expected that the dividends will be "eligible dividends" for income tax purposes and thus qualify for the enhanced gross-up and tax credit regime for certain shareholders of the Company.
Record of Cash Dividends
The following table sets forth the amount of per period cash distributions per Unit declared by the Trust since the completion of the 2003 Arrangement on January 22, 2003 and the per period cash dividends per common share declared by the Company since the completion of the Conversion Arrangement on September 1, 2010. Dividends are generally paid on the 15th day of the month following the month of declaration. Until the December 14, 2007 distribution announcement, Vermilion had paid distributions of $0.17 per Trust Unit per month. Starting with the January 15, 2008 payment date, Vermilion has paid distributions/dividends of $0.19 per Trust Unit /common share per month.
Period | Distribution Amount for Period per Trust Unit |
As Vermilion Energy Trust | |
2003 – January 22 to December 31 | $1.87 |
2004 – January to December | $2.04 |
2005 – January to December | $2.04 |
2006 – January to December | $2.04 |
2007 – January to December | $2.06 |
2008 – January to December | $2.28 |
2009 – January to December | $2.28 |
2010 – January to September (1) | $1.71 |
Period | Dividend Amount for Period per Common Share |
As Vermilion Energy Inc. | |
2010 – September to December (1) | $0.57 |
2011 – January to March | $0.57 |
Total cash dividends since January 22, 2003 (2) | $17.46 |
Note:
(1) | Total cash dividends paid out in 2010 by Vermilion and the Trust to a holder of a common share who was a former holder of a Trust Unit equals $2.28. |
(2) | On March 15, 2011, the Company announced that it would pay a cash dividend of $0.19 per common share to Shareholders of record as of March 31, 2011 on April 15, 2011. The total cash dividends since January 22, 2003 does not include the April dividend of $0.19. |
Dividend Reinvestment Plan
The Company has established a DRIP Plan. The DRIP Plan is only available to registered Shareholders who are residents of Canada.
Under the DRIP Plan, registered Shareholders may, at their option, reinvest their cash dividends to purchase additional common shares (the "DRIP common shares") by directing the Plan Agent (as defined below) to apply dividends on their existing common shares to the purchase of DRIP common shares. Computershare Trust Company of Canada in its capacity as plan agent (the "Plan Agent") will apply cash dividends towards the purchase of DRIP common shares from the Company, subject to certain limitations either from treasury or at the discretion of Vermilion through the facilities of the TSX. DRIP common shares will be acquired either at the average market price at which DRIP common shares are acquired through the facilities of the TSX or from treasury based on the weighted average of the previous 10 days of trading prior to the applicable dividend. Participants in the DRIP Plan will also receive additional dividends of common shares equal to 5% of the DRIP common shares purchased with their dividends. Participants will not have to pay any brokerage fees or service charges in connection with the purchase of DRIP common shares.
Registered Shareholders may, after electing to participate in the DRIP Plan, terminate their participation in the DRIP Plan by written notice to the Plan Agent. That notice, if actually received no later than five (5) business days prior to a Dividend Record Date, will have effect for the dividend to be made on the following Dividend Payment Date. Thereafter, dividends to those Shareholders will be in cash. The Company may amend, suspend or terminate the DRIP Plan in its sole discretion provided that any amendment to the DRIP Plan must be approved by the TSX and that any amendment, modification or suspension shall have no retroactive effect if it would prejudice the interests of the participants. The Company is not required to issue common shares into any jurisdiction where the issuance would be illegal.
Shareholder Rights Plan
A unitholder rights plan was first implemented in 2003 in conjunction with the 2003 Arrangement. At each of the annual and special meetings of holders of Trust Units held in 2006 and 2009, the unitholders rights plan was renewed and approved by holders of the Trust Units. In conjunction with the Conversion Arrangement, a shareholder rights plan (the “Rights Plan”) for the Company was approved. The objectives of the Rights Plan are to ensure, to the extent possible, that all Shareholders are treated equally and fairly in connection with any takeover bid for the Company. Takeover bids may be structured to be coercive or may be initiated at a time when the board of directors of Vermilion will have a difficult time preparing an adequate response to the offer. Accordingly, such offers do not always result in Shareholders receiving equal or fair treatment or full or maximum value for their investment. Under current Canadian securities legislation, a takeover bid is required to remain open for 35 days, a period of time which may be insufficient for the directors to:
(a) | evaluate a takeover bid (particularly if it includes share or trust unit consideration); |
(b) | explore, develop and pursue alternatives which are superior to the takeover bid and which could maximize Shareholder value; and |
(c) | make reasoned recommendations to the Shareholders. |
The Rights Plan discourages discriminatory, coercive or unfair takeovers of the Company and gives the board of directors of Vermilion time if, in the circumstances, the board of directors determines it is appropriate to take such time, to pursue alternatives to maximize Shareholder value in the event an unsolicited takeover bid is made for all or a portion of the outstanding common shares of the Company. As set forth in detail below, the Rights Plan discourages coercive hostile takeover bids by creating the potential that any common shares which may be acquired or held by such a bidder will be significantly diluted. The potential for significant dilution to the holdings of such a bidder can occur as the Rights Plan provides that all holders of common shares who are not related to the bidder will be entitled to exercise rights issued to them under the Rights Plan and to acquire common shares at a substantial discount to prevailing market prices. The bidder or the persons related to the bidder will not be entitled to exercise any Rights under the Rights Plan. Accordingly, the Rights Plan will encourage potential bidders to make takeover bids by means of a Permitted Bid (as defined below) or to approach the board of directors of Vermilion to negotiate a mutually acceptable transaction. The Permitted Bid provisions of the Rights Plan are designed to ensure that in any takeover bid for outstanding common shares of the Company all Shareholders are treated equally and are given adequate time to properly assess such takeover bid on a fully-informed basis.
The Rights Plan was not proposed in response to, or in anticipation of, any pending, threatened or proposed acquisition or takeover bid. The board of directors did not adopt the Rights Plan to prevent a takeover of the Company, to secure the continuance of management or the directors of the Company in their respective offices or to deter fair offers for the Common Shares of the Company.
Summary of the Plan
The following summary of terms of the Rights Plan is qualified in its entirety by reference to the text of the Shareholder Rights Plan Agreement. A copy of the Shareholder Rights Plan Agreement will be available in its entirety upon request at the head office of Vermilion during normal business hours.
Term
The Rights Plan will remain in effect until termination of the annual meeting of Shareholders of the Company in 2013 unless the term of the Shareholder Rights Plan Agreement is extended beyond such date by resolution of Shareholders.
Issue of Rights
One right (a "Right") has been issued by the Company pursuant to the Shareholder Rights Plan Agreement in respect of each common share of the Company outstanding at the close of business on September 1, 2010 (the "Record Time"). One Right will also be issued for each additional common share issued after the Record Time and prior to the earlier of the Separation Time (as defined below) or the Expiration Time (as defined below).
Rights Exercise Privilege
The Rights will separate from the voting common shares to which they are attached and become exercisable at the time (the "Separation Time") which is 10 trading days following the date a person becomes an Acquiring Person (as defined below) or announces an intention to make a takeover bid that is not an acquisition pursuant to a takeover bid permitted by the Rights Plan (a "Permitted Bid").
Any transaction or event in which a person (an "Acquiring Person"), including associates and affiliates and others acting in concert, acquires (other than pursuant to an exemption available under the Rights Plan or a Permitted Bid) Beneficial Ownership (as defined in the Rights Plan) of 20% or more of the voting securities of the Company is referred to as a "Flip-in Event". Any Rights held by an Acquiring Person on or after the earlier of the Separation Time or the first date of public announcement by the Company or an Acquiring Person that an Acquiring Person has become such, will become void and the Rights (other than those held by the Acquiring Person) will permit the holder to purchase common shares at a substantial discount to their prevailing market price at the time.
The issuance of the Rights is not dilutive and will not affect reported earnings or cash flow per common share until the Rights separate from the underlying common shares and become exercisable or until the exercise of the Rights. The issuance of the Rights will not change the manner in which Shareholders currently trade their common shares.
Permitted Lock-Up Agreement
A person will not become an Acquiring Person by virtue of having entered into an agreement (a "Permitted Lock-Up Agreement") with a Shareholder whereby the Shareholder agrees to deposit or tender voting common shares to a takeover bid made by such person, provided that the agreement meets certain requirements including:
(a) | the terms of the agreement are publicly disclosed and a copy of the agreement is publicly available; |
(b) | the Shareholder who has agreed to tender voting common shares to the takeover bid (the "Lock-Up Bid") made by the other party to the agreement is permitted to terminate its obligation under the agreement in order to tender voting common shares to another takeover bid or transaction where: (i) the offer price or value of the consideration payable under the other takeover bid or transaction is greater than the price or value of the consideration per common share at which the Shareholder has agreed to deposit or tender voting common shares to the Lock-Up Bid or is equal to or greater than a specified minimum which is not more than 7% higher than the offer price under the Lock-Up Bid; and (ii) if the number of voting common shares offered to be purchased under the Lock-Up Bid is less than all of the voting common shares held by Shareholders (excluding common shares held by the offeror), the number of voting common shares offered to be purchased under the other takeover bid or transaction (at an offer price not lower than in the Lock-Up Bid) is greater than the number of voting common shares offered to be purchased under the Lock-Up Bid or is equal to or greater than a specified number which is not more than 7% higher than the number of voting common shares offered to be purchased under the Lock-Up Bid; and |
(c) | no break-up fees or other penalties that exceed in the aggregate the greater of 2.5% of the price or value of the consideration payable under the Lock-Up Bid and 50% of the increase in consideration resulting from another takeover bid or transaction shall be payable by the Shareholder if the Shareholder fails to deposit or tender voting common shares to the Lock-Up Bid. |
Certificates and Transferability
Prior to the Separation Time, the Rights will be evidenced by a legend imprinted on certificates for common shares issued from and after the effective date (the "Effective Date") of the Shareholder Rights Plan Agreement (being the later of the date of the Shareholder Rights Plan Agreement and the receipt by the Company of all regulatory approvals with respect to the Shareholder Rights Plan Agreement). Rights are also attached to common shares outstanding on the Effective Date, although certificates issued prior to the Effective Date will not bear such a legend. Shareholders are not required to return their certificates in order to have the benefit of the Rights. Prior to the Separation Time, Rights will trade together with the Company common shares and will not be exercisable or transferable separately from the common shares. From and after the Separation Time, the Rights will become exercisable, will be evidenced by Rights Certificates and will be transferable separately from the common shares.
Permitted Bid Requirements
The requirements of a "Permitted Bid" include the following:
(a) | the takeover bid must be made by means of a takeover bid circular; |
(b) | the takeover bid is made to all holders of voting common shares as registered on the books of the Company, other than the offeror; |
(c) | the takeover bid contains, and the take-up and payment for securities tendered or deposited is subject to, an irrevocable and unqualified provision that no voting common shares will be taken up or paid for pursuant to the takeover bid prior to the close of business on the date which is not less than 45 days following the date of the takeover bid and only if at such date more than 50% of the voting common shares held by independent Shareholders shall have been deposited or tendered pursuant to the takeover bid and not withdrawn; |
(d) | the takeover bid contains an irrevocable and unqualified provision that unless the takeover bid is withdrawn, voting common shares may be deposited pursuant to such takeover bid at any time during the period of time between the date of the takeover bid and the date on which voting common shares may be taken up and paid for and that any voting common shares deposited pursuant to the takeover bid may be withdrawn until taken up and paid for; and |
(e) | the takeover bid contains an irrevocable and unqualified provision that if, on the date on which voting common shares may be taken up and paid for, more than 50% of the voting common shares held by independent Shareholders shall have been deposited pursuant to the takeover bid and not withdrawn, the offeror will make a public announcement of that fact and the takeover bid will remain open for deposits and tenders of voting common shares for not less than ten business days from the date of such public announcement. |
The Rights Plan allows for a competing Permitted Bid (a "Competing Permitted Bid") to be made while a Permitted Bid is in existence. A Competing Permitted Bid must satisfy all of the requirements of a Permitted Bid except that it may expire on the same date as the Permitted Bid, subject to the requirement that it be outstanding for a minimum period of 35 days.
Waiver and Redemption
If a potential offeror does not desire to make a Permitted Bid, it can negotiate with, and obtain the prior approval of, the board of directors to make a takeover bid by way of a takeover bid circular sent to all holders of voting common shares on terms which the board of directors considers fair to all Shareholders. In such circumstances, the board of directors may waive the application of the Rights Plan thereby allowing such bid to proceed without dilution to the offeror. Any waiver of the application of the Rights Plan in respect of a particular takeover bid shall also constitute a waiver of any other takeover bid which is made by means of a takeover bid circular to all holders of voting common shares while the initial takeover bid is outstanding. The board of directors may also waive the application of the Rights Plan in respect of a particular Flip-in Event that has occurred through inadvertence, provided that the Acquiring Person that inadvertently triggered such Flip-in Event reduces its beneficial holdings to less than 20% of the outstanding voting common shares of the Company within 14 days or such earlier or later date as may be specified by the board. With the prior consent of the holders of voting common shares, the board of directors may, prior to the occurrence of a Flip-in Event that would occur by reason of an acquisition of voting common shares otherwise than pursuant to the foregoing, waive the application of the Rights Plan to such Flip-in Event.
The board of directors may, with the prior consent of the holders of voting common shares, at any time prior to the occurrence of a Flip-in Event, elect to redeem all but not less than all of the then outstanding Rights at a redemption price of $0.00001 per Right. Rights are deemed to be redeemed following completion of a Permitted Bid, a Competing Permitted Bid or a takeover bid in respect of which the board of directors has waived the application of the Rights Plan.
Exemptions for Investment Advisors
Investment advisors (for client accounts), trust companies (acting in their capacity as trustees or administrators), statutory bodies whose business includes the management of funds (for employee benefit plans, pension plans, or insurance plans of various public bodies) and administrators or trustees of registered pension plans or funds acquiring greater than 20% of the voting common shares are exempted from triggering a Flip-in Event, provided they are not making, either alone or jointly or in concert with any other person, a takeover bid.
Board of Directors
The adoption of the Rights Plan does not in any way lessen or affect the duty of the board of directors to act honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the Company. The board of directors, when a takeover bid or similar offer is made, will continue to have the duty and power to take such actions and make such recommendations to Shareholders as are considered appropriate.
Amendment
The Company may, with the prior approval of Shareholders (or the holders of Rights if the Separation Time has occurred), supplement amend, vary or delete any of the provisions of the Shareholder Rights Plan Agreement. The Company may make amendments to the Shareholder Rights Plan Agreement at any time to correct any clerical or typographical error or, subject to confirmation at the next meeting of Shareholders, make amendments which are required to maintain the validity of the Shareholder Rights Plan Agreement due to changes in any applicable legislation, regulations or rules.
AUDIT COMMITTEE MATTERS
Audit Committee Charter
Vermilion has established an audit committee (the "Audit Committee") to assist the board of directors in carrying out its oversight responsibilities with respect to, among other things, financial reporting, internal controls and the external audit process of the Company. The Audit Committee Terms of Reference are set out in Schedule "C" to this annual information form.
Composition of the Audit Committee
The following table sets forth the name of each current member of the Audit Committee, whether pursuant to applicable securities legislation, such member is considered independent, whether pursuant to applicable securities legislation, such member is considered financially literate and the relevant education and experience of such member.
Name | Independent | Financially Literate | Relevant Education and Experience |
W. Kenneth Davidson (Chair) | Yes | Yes | Mr. Davidson holds Bachelor of Science degrees in Mathematics and Business and a Masters in Business Administration degree. Mr. Davidson has obtained significant financial experience and exposure to accounting including internal controls and procedures for financial reporting and complex financial issues as a director, officer or consultant to a number of companies involved in the banking and securities areas of the financial services sector. |
Claudio A. Ghersinich | Yes | Yes | Mr. Ghersinich holds a B.Sc. Civil Engineering degree from the University of Manitoba. Mr. Ghersinich has obtained financial experience and exposure to accounting and financial issues in a role as a founder of Vermilion Resources Ltd. in 1994 and as an audit committee member of other public companies. |
Joseph F. Killi | Yes | Yes | Mr. Killi holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Biochemistry, a Bachelor of Commerce degree and a Chartered Accountant designation. As a Chartered Accountant, Mr. Killi attained experience in preparing, auditing, analyzing and evaluating financial statements including internal controls and procedures for financial reporting. Mr. Killi has an understanding of the accounting principles used by the Company as well as the implications of those accounting principles on the Company's financial results. Mr. Killi has also obtained significant financial experience and exposure to accounting and financial issues in a number of senior positions with Parkbridge Lifestyle Communities Inc., Realex Properties Corp. and Trizec Corporation and in his role as a director and audit committee member of other public and private companies. |
Larry J. Macdonald | Yes | Yes | Mr. Macdonald holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Geology. In 2005, Mr. Macdonald attended a financial literacy course at the University of Toronto's Rotman's School of Management in conjunction with the Institute of Corporate Directors. In addition, Mr. Macdonald has obtained financial experience and exposure to accounting and financial issues in a number of senior officer positions with Point Energy Ltd., Pointwest Energy Inc., Westpoint Energy Inc. and Anderson Exploration Ltd. and as a director, audit committee member and officer of a number of other public and private companies as well as not-for-profit organizations. |
William F. Madison | Yes | Yes | Mr. Madison holds a Bachelor of Science in Petroleum Engineering. Mr. Madison has completed the Harvard Program for Management Development. Mr. Madison has obtained financial experience and exposure to accounting and financial issues as the Chairman of Montana Tech Foundation and as a senior executive of Marathon Oil Company and as a director, audit committee member and officer of other public and private companies. |
External Audit Service Fees
Prior to the commencement of any work, fees for all audit and non-audit services provided by the Company’s auditors must be approved by the Audit Committee.
During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, Deloitte & Touche LLP, the auditors of the Company, received the following fees from the Company:
Item | 2010 | 2009 |
Audit fees(1) | $1,389,597 | $1,693,659 |
All other fees(2) | $22,239 | $ 12,296 |
Notes:
(1) | Audit fees consisted of professional services rendered by Deloitte & Touche LLP for the audit of the Company's financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, fees for the review of the quarterly financial statements and services provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. |
(2) | For 2010, the amount reported relates to income tax compliance work and the 2009 figure relates to property tax consulting services. |
MARKET FOR PRICE RANGE AND TRADING VOLUME OF SECURITIES
The outstanding Common Shares of the Company are listed and posted for trading on the TSX under the symbol VET, prior to the Conversion Arrangement, the Trust Units were listed for trading on the TSX under the symbol VET.UN. The following table sets forth the closing price range and trading volume of the common shares and the Trust Units for the periods indicated:
Trust Units 2010 | High | Low | Close | Volume (000's) |
January | $34.60 | $31.57 | $32.32 | 4,498 |
February | $34.82 | $31.68 | $34.82 | 3,944 |
March | $35.81 | $34.04 | $35.39 | 4,275 |
April | $36.36 | $34.73 | $35.25 | 3,472 |
May | $35.60 | $31.25 | $33.55 | 3,939 |
June | $35.75 | $32.50 | $33.67 | 3,897 |
July | $34.91 | $32.21 | $33.10 | 2,376 |
August | $35.92 | $32.33 | $35.67 | 4,980 |
September | $36.75 | $35.51 | $36.75 | 3,167 |
Common Shares 2010 | High | Low | Close | Volume (000's) |
September | $38.90 | $35.15 | $38.62 | 9,286 |
October | $40.60 | $37.77 | $39.94 | 3,365 |
November | $43.20 | $38.57 | $42.02 | 4,651 |
December | $47.59 | $41.81 | $46.22 | 4,539 |
Common Shares 2011 | High | Low | Close | Volume (000's) |
January | $47.80 | $44.60 | $47.36 | 3,413 |
February | $52.45 | $45.87 | $51.05 | 4,523 |
CREDIT RATINGS
The following information relating to the Company's credit ratings is provided as it relates to the Company's financing costs, liquidity and operations. Specifically, credit ratings affect the Company's ability to obtain short-term and long-term financing and the cost of such financing. Additionally, the ability of the Company to engage in certain collateralized business activities on a cost effective basis depends on the Company's credit ratings. A reduction in the current rating on the Company's debt by its rating agencies, particularly a downgrade below current ratings, or a negative change in the Company's ratings outlook could adversely affect the Company's cost of financing and its access to sources of liquidity and capital. In addition, changes in credit ratings may affect the Company's ability to, and the associated costs of, (i) entering into ordinary course derivative or hedging transactions and may require the Company to post additional collateral under certain of its contracts, and (ii) entering into and maintaining ordinary course contracts with customers and suppliers on acceptable terms.
The Company's $225 million of Senior Unsecured Notes have a rating of BB (low)/Stable from DBRS Limited ("DBRS") and BB- from Standard & Poor's Ratings Services, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies (Canada) Corporation ("S&P").
DBRS rates long-term debt instruments by rating categories ranging from a high of "AAA" to a low of "D". All rating categories other than AAA and D also contain subcategories "(high)" and "(low)". The absence of either a "(high)" or "(low)" designation indicates the rating is in the middle of the category. A rating of "BB" is characterized by DBRS to be speculative, non investment-grade credit quality. The capacity for the payment of financial obligations is uncertain and vulnerable to future events. The "BB" category is the fifth highest of the ten available categories.
S&P rates long-term debt instruments by rating categories ranging from a high of "AAA" to a low of "D". The ratings from AA to CCC may be modified by the addition of a plus (+) or minus (-) sign to show relative standing within the major rating categories. An obligation rated "BB" is characterized as less vulnerable to nonpayment than other speculative issues. However, it faces major ongoing uncertainties or exposure to adverse business, financial, or economic conditions, which could lead to the obligor's inadequate capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation. The "BB" category is the fifth highest of the ten available categories.
Vermilion Rating
DBRS Limited has provided a corporate credit rating of Vermilion of “BB (low”). A rating of “BB” is characterized by DBRS Limited to be speculative, non investment-grade credit quality. The capacity for the payment of financial obligations is uncertain and vulnerable to future events.
S&P has assigned a corporate credit rating of Vermilion of “BB-” with a stable outlook. An obligor rated “BB” is characterized by S&P as less vulnerable in the near term than other lower-rated obligors. However, it faces major ongoing uncertainties and exposure to adverse business, financial or economic conditions, which could lead to the obligor’s inadequate capacity to meet its financial commitments. The plus (+) or minus (-) modifiers indicate the relative standing within the assigned category. In addition, S&P may add a rating outlook of “positive”, “negative” or “stable” which assesses the potential direction of a long-term credit rating over the intermediate term (typically six months to two years).
Credit ratings are intended to provide investors with an independent measure of the credit quality of an issuer of securities. The credit ratings accorded to the Senior Unsecured Notes and the Company are not recommendations to purchase, hold or sell such securities and are not a comment upon the market price of the Company's securities or their suitability for a particular investor. There is no assurance that any rating will remain in effect for any given period of time or that any rating will not be revised or withdrawn entirely by a rating agency in the future if, in its judgment, circumstances so warrant. A revision or withdrawal of a credit rating could have a material adverse effect on the pricing or liquidity of the Senior Unsecured Notes or the Common Shares in any secondary markets. Vermilion does not undertake any obligation to maintain the ratings or to advise holders of the Senior Unsecured Notes or the Common Shares of any change in ratings. Each agency's rating should be evaluated independently of any other agency's rating.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The directors and officers of Vermilion are engaged in and will continue to engage in other activities in the oil and natural gas industry and, as a result of these and other activities, the directors and officers of Vermilion may become subject to conflicts of interest. The ABCA provides that in the event that a director has an interest in a contract or proposed contract or agreement, the director shall disclose his interest in such contract or agreement and shall refrain from voting on any matter in respect of such contract or agreement unless otherwise provided under the ABCA. To the extent that conflicts of interest arise, such conflicts will be resolved in accordance with the provisions of the ABCA.
As at the date hereof, Vermilion is not aware of any existing or potential material conflicts of interest between Vermilion and a director or officer of Vermilion.
INTEREST OF MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS IN MATERIAL TRANSACTIONS
No director or officer of the Company, nor any other insider of the Company, nor their associates or affiliates has or has had, at any time within the three most recently completed financial years ending December 31, 2010, any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction or proposed transaction that has materially affected or would materially affect the Company.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is not party to any significant legal proceedings as of March 10, 2011.
MATERIAL CONTRACTS
The Company has not entered into any material contracts outside its normal course of business.
INTERESTS OF EXPERTS
As at the date hereof, principals of GLJ, the independent engineers for the Company, personally disclosed in certificates of qualification that they neither had nor expect to receive any common shares. The principals of GLJ and their employees (as a group) beneficially own less than one percent of any of the Company’s securities. Deloitte & Touche LLP is the auditor of the Company and is independent within the meaning of the Rules of Professional Conduct of the Institute of Chartered Accountants, Alberta.
TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR
The transfer agent and registrar for the Company’s common shares is Computershare Trust Company of Canada at its principal offices in Calgary, Alberta and Toronto, Ontario.
RISK FACTORS
The following is a summary of certain risk factors relating to the business of the Company. The following information is a summary only of certain risk factors and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, and must be read in conjunction with, the detailed information appearing elsewhere in this annual information form. Shareholders and potential Shareholders should consider carefully the information contained herein and, in particular, the following risk factors.
Reserve Estimates
There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of proved and provable reserves and future net revenues to be derived therefrom, including many factors beyond the Company's control. The reserve and future net revenue information set forth in this annual information form represents estimates only. The reserves and estimated future net cash flow from the Company's properties have been independently evaluation by GLJ with an effective date of December 31, 2010. These evaluations include a number of assumptions relating to factors such as initial production rates, production decline rates, ultimate recovery of reserves, timing and amount of capital expenditures, marketability of production, future prices of crude oil and natural gas, operating costs, well abandonment and salvage values, royalties and other government levies that may be imposed over the producing life of the reserves. These assumptions were based on prices in use at the date the GLJ Report was prepared, and many of these assumptions are subject to change and are beyond the Company's control. Actual production and cash flow derived therefrom will vary from these evaluations, and such variations could be material.
Estimates with respect to reserves that may be developed and produced in the future are often based upon volumetric calculations, probabilistic methods and upon analogy to similar types of reserves, rather than upon actual production history. Estimates based on these methods generally are less reliable than those based on actual production history. Subsequent evaluation of the same reserves based upon production history will result in variations, which may be material, in the estimated reserves.
Reserve estimates may require revision based on actual production experience. Such figures have been determined based upon assumed commodity prices and operating costs.
The present value of estimated future net revenue referred to in this annual information form should not be construed as the fair market value of estimated crude oil and natural gas reserves attributable to the Company's properties. The estimated discounted future revenue from reserves are based upon price and cost estimates which may vary from actual prices and costs and such variance could be material. Actual future net revenue will also be affected by factors such as the amount and timing of actual production, supply and demand for crude oil and natural gas, curtailments or increases in consumption by purchasers and changes in governmental regulations and taxation.
Volatility of Oil and Natural Gas Prices
The Company's operational results and financial condition will be dependent on the prices received for oil and natural gas production. Oil and natural gas prices have fluctuated widely during recent years and are determined by supply and demand factors, including weather and general economic conditions as well as conditions in other oil and natural gas regions. Any decline in oil and natural gas prices could have an adverse effect on Vermilion's cash flow which could have the effect of decreasing dividends.
Changes in Legislation
There can be no assurance that income tax laws and government incentive programs relating to the oil and gas industry in Canada and the foreign jurisdictions in which the Company operates, will not be changed in a manner which adversely affects the Company. This includes, but is not limited to the status of the resource allowance.
The Government of Alberta receives royalties on production of natural resources from lands in which it owns the mineral rights. A change in the royalty regime resulting in an increase in royalties would reduce Vermilion's earnings and could make future capital expenditures or Vermilion's operations uneconomic and could, in the event of a material increase in royalties, make it more difficult to service and repay outstanding debt. Any material increase in royalties would also significantly reduce the value of the Company's associated assets.
Government Regulations
Vermilion's operations are governed by many levels of government, including municipal, state, provincial and federal governments, in Canada, France, the Netherlands, Australia and Ireland. Vermilion is subject to laws and regulations regarding health and safety issues, lease interests, taxes and royalties, among others. Failure to comply with the applicable laws can result in significant increases in costs, penalties and even losses of operating licences. The regulatory process involved in each of the countries in which Vermilion operates is not uniform and regulatory regimes vary as to complexity, timeliness of access to, and response from, regulatory bodies and other matters specific to each jurisdiction. If regulatory approvals or permits are delayed or not obtained, there can also be delays or abandonment of projects, decreases in production and increases in costs, and Vermilion may not be able to fully execute its strategy. Governments may also amend or create new legislation and regulatory bodies may also amend regulations or impose additional requirements which could result in increased capital, operating and compliance costs.
Competition
Vermilion actively competes for reserve acquisitions, exploration leases, licences and concessions and skilled industry personnel with a substantial number of other oil and gas companies, some of which have significantly greater financial resources than Vermilion. Vermilion's competitors include major integrated oil and natural gas companies and numerous other independent oil and natural gas companies and individual producers and operators.
The oil and gas industry is highly competitive. Vermilion's competitors for the acquisition, exploration, production and development of oil and natural gas properties, and for capital to finance such activities, include companies that have greater financial and personnel resources available to them than Vermilion.
Vermilion's ability to successfully bid on and acquire additional property rights, to discover reserves, to participate in drilling opportunities and to identify and enter into commercial arrangements with customers will be dependent upon developing and maintaining close working relationships with its future industry partners and joint operators and its ability to select and evaluate suitable properties and to consummate transactions in a highly competitive environment.
Operational Matters
The operation of oil and gas wells and facilities involves a number of operating and natural hazards which may result in blowouts, environmental damage and other unexpected or dangerous conditions resulting in damage to Vermilion and possible liability to third parties. Vermilion will maintain liability insurance, where available, in amounts consistent with industry standards. Business interruption insurance may also be purchased for selected operations, to the extent that such insurance is available. Vermilion may become liable for damages arising from such events against which it cannot insure or against which it may elect not to insure because of high premium costs or other reasons. Costs incurred to repair such damage or pay such liabilities may impair Vermilion's ability to satisfy its debt obligations or declare dividends.
Continuing production from a property, and to some extent the marketing of production, are largely dependent upon the ability of the operator of the property. To the extent the operator fails to perform these functions properly, revenue may be reduced. Payments from production generally flow through the operator and there is a risk of delay and additional expense in receiving such revenues if the operator becomes insolvent. Although satisfactory title reviews are generally conducted in accordance with industry standards, such reviews do not guarantee or certify that a defect in the chain of title may not arise to defeat the claim of Vermilion or its subsidiaries to certain properties. Such circumstances could impair Vermilion's ability to satisfy its debt obligations or declare dividends.
Environmental Concerns
The oil and natural gas industry is subject to environmental regulation pursuant to local, provincial and federal legislation. A breach of such legislation may result in the imposition of fines or issuance of clean up orders in respect of Vermilion or its assets. Such legislation may be changed to impose higher standards and potentially more costly obligations on Vermilion. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to satisfy its actual future environmental and reclamation obligations.
Kyoto Protocol
Australia, Canada, France, Ireland and the Netherlands are signatories to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and all have ratified the Kyoto Protocol established thereunder. Australia, Canada, France, Ireland and the Netherlands, as Annex B parties to the Kyoto Protocol, and France and Netherlands as a party to the European Union Regional Integration Organization, are required to set legally binding targets to reduce nation-wide emissions of carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide and other so-called "greenhouse gases".
Vermilion's exploration and production facilities and other operations and activities in Australia, Canada, France, Ireland and the Netherlands will emit a small amount of greenhouse gasses which may subject Vermilion to legislation regulating emissions of greenhouse gases and which may include a requirement to reduce emissions or emissions intensity from Vermilion's operations and facilities. The direct or indirect costs of complying with emissions regulations may adversely affect the business of Vermilion in Australia, Canada, France, Ireland and the Netherlands.
Debt Service
Vermilion may, from time to time, finance a significant portion of its operations through debt. Amounts paid in respect of interest and principal on debt incurred by Vermilion may impair Vermilion's ability to satisfy its other obligations. Variations in interest rates and scheduled principal repayments could result in significant changes in the amount required to be applied to debt service before payment by Vermilion of its debt obligations. Ultimately, this may result in lower levels of cash flow for the Company.
Lenders may be provided with security over substantially all of the assets of Vermilion and its Subsidiaries. If Vermilion becomes unable to pay its debt service charges or otherwise commits an event of default such as bankruptcy, a lender may be able to foreclose on or sell the assets of Vermilion and/or its Subsidiaries.
Delay in Cash Dividends
In addition to the usual delays in payment by purchasers of oil and natural gas to the operators of the properties, and by the operator to Vermilion, payments between any of such parties may also be delayed by restrictions imposed by lenders, delays in the sale or delivery of products, delays in the connection of wells to a gathering system, blowouts or other accidents, recovery by the operator of expenses incurred in the operation of the properties or the establishment by the operator of reserves for such expenses.
Changes in Income Tax Laws
Income tax laws and administrative policies regarding mutual fund trusts may be changed in a manner which adversely affects the Company and/or the Shareholders.
Depletion of Reserves
The Company has certain unique attributes which differentiate it from other oil and gas industry participants. Dividends paid from cash flow generated in respect of properties, absent commodity price increases or cost effective acquisition and development activities, may decline over time in a manner consistent with declining production from typical oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids reserves. Accordingly, absent capital expenditures or acquisitions of additional oil and gas properties, Vermilion's current production levels and reserves will decline.
Vermilion's future oil and natural gas reserves and production, and therefore its cash flows, will be highly dependent on Vermilion's success in exploiting its reserve base and acquiring additional reserves. Without reserve additions through acquisition or development activities, Vermilion's reserves and production will decline over time as reserves are exploited.
Net Asset Value
The net asset value of the assets of the Company from time to time will vary dependent upon a number of factors beyond the control of management, including oil and gas prices. The trading prices of the common shares from time to time is also determined by a number of factors which are beyond the control of management and such trading prices may be greater than the net asset value of the Company's assets.
Variations in Interest Rates and Foreign Exchange Rates
An increase in interest rates could result in a significant increase in the amount the Company pays to service debt, potentially impacting dividends to shareholders.
In addition, an increase in the exchange rate for the Canadian dollar versus the U.S. dollar would result in the receipt by the Company of fewer Canadian dollars for its production which may affect future Dividends. The Company monitors and, when appropriate, uses derivative financial instruments to manage its exposure to these risks. The increase in the exchange rate for the Canadian dollar and future Canadian/United States exchange rates may impact future Dividends and the future value of the Company's reserves as determined by independent evaluators.
Increase in Operating Costs or Decline in Production Level
An increase in operating costs or a decline in Vermilion’s production level could have an adverse effect on Vermilion’s cash flow and, therefore, could reduce dividends to Shareholders and affect the market price of the common shares. The level of production may decline at rates greater than anticipated due to unforeseen circumstances, many of which are beyond Vermilion's control. A significant decline in production could result in materially lower revenues and cash flow and, therefore, could reduce dividends to Shareholders and affect the market price of the common shares.
Acquisition Assumptions
When making acquisitions, Vermilion estimates future performance of the assets to be acquired that may prove to be inaccurate. Acquired assets are subject to inherent risks associated with predicting the future performance of those assets. Vermilion makes certain estimates and assumptions respecting the economic potential of the assets it acquires which may not be realized over time. As such, assets acquired may not possess the value Vermilion attributed to them, which could adversely impact cash flow.
Failure to Realize Anticipated Benefits of Prior Acquisitions
Vermilion has completed several acquisitions since December 31, 2008, which acquisitions were completed to strengthen its position in the oil and natural gas industry and to create the opportunity to realize certain benefits, including, among other things, potential cost savings. In order to achieve the benefits of these and future acquisitions, Vermilion will be dependent upon its ability to successfully consolidate functions and integrate operations, procedures and personnel in a timely and efficient manner and to realize the anticipated growth opportunities and synergies from combining the acquired assets and operations with those of the Company. The integration of acquired assets and operations requires the dedication of management effort, time and resources, which may divert management's focus and resources from other strategic opportunities and from operational matters during the process. The integration process may result in the disruption of ongoing business and customer relationships that may adversely affect Vermilion's ability to achieve the anticipated benefits of such prior acquisitions.
Additional Financing
Vermilion’s credit facility and any replacement credit facility may not provide sufficient liquidity. The amounts available under Vermilion's credit facility may not be sufficient for future operations, or Vermilion may not be able to obtain additional financing on attractive economic terms, if at all. Any failure to obtain financing may have a material adverse effect on Vermilion's business, and dividends to Shareholders may be reduced, suspended or eliminated.
To the extent that external sources of capital, including the issuance of additional common shares, become limited or unavailable, Vermilion's ability to make the necessary capital investments to maintain or expand its oil and natural gas reserves will be impaired. To the extent the Company is required to use cash flow to finance capital expenditures or property acquisitions, the level of cash available for distribution will be reduced.
Potential Conflicts of Interest
Circumstances may arise where members of the board of directors or officers of Vermilion are directors or officers of corporations which are in competition to the interests of Vermilion. No assurances can be given that opportunities identified by such persons will be provided to Vermilion.
GAAP Adjustments
GAAP requires that management apply certain accounting policies and make certain estimates and assumptions which affect reported amounts in Vermilion’s consolidated financial statements. The accounting policies may result in non-cash charges to net income and write-downs of net assets in the financial statements. Such non-cash charges and write-downs may be viewed unfavourably by the market and may result in an inability to borrow funds and/or may result in a decline in the common share price.
Lower oil and gas prices increase the risk of write-downs of Vermilion’s oil and gas property investments. Under GAAP, the net capitalized cost of oil and gas properties may not exceed a "ceiling limit" that is based, in part, upon estimated future net cash flows from reserves. If the net capitalized costs exceed this limit, Vermilion must charge the amount of the excess against earnings. If oil and natural gas prices decline, Vermilion’s net capitalized cost may exceed this ceiling, ultimately resulting in a charge against its earnings. While these write-downs would not affect cash flow, the charge to earnings could be viewed unfavourably in the market.
Market Accessibility
A decline in Vermilion’s ability to market oil and natural gas production could have a material adverse effect on its production levels or on the price that Vermilion receives for production which, in turn, could reduce Dividends to its Shareholders and the trading price of the common shares.
Vermilion’s business depends in part upon the availability, proximity and capacity of natural gas gathering systems, pipelines and processing facilities. Canadian federal and provincial, as well as United States federal and state, regulation of oil and gas production, processing and transportation, tax and energy policies, general economic conditions, and changes in supply and demand could adversely affect Vermilion’s ability to produce and market oil and natural gas. If market factors change and inhibit the marketing of Vermilion production, overall production or realized prices may decline, which could reduce dividends to Shareholders.
International Financial Reporting Standards
The requirement for Vermilion to implement International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) to replace Canadian GAAP effective January 1, 2011 may materially affect the Company’s financial results as reported in its financial statements and may require Vermilion to amend its Credit Facilities to address the changes in accounting principles. As of the date of this Annual Information Form, Vermilion has to yet finalize all of its accounting policies under IFRS. For additional information, see “International Financial Reporting Standards Transition” in the Company’s management’s discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2010.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Additional information relating to the Company may be found on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Additional information related to the remuneration and indebtedness of the directors and officers of the Company, and the principal holders of Common Shares and Rights to purchase Common Shares and securities authorized for issuance under the Company's equity compensation plans, where applicable, are contained in the information circular of the Company in respect of its most recent annual meeting of Shareholders involving the election of directors. Additional financial information is provided in the Company's audited financial statements and management's discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2010.
SCHEDULE "A"
REPORT ON RESERVES DATA BY INDEPENDENT QUALIFIED RESERVES EVALUATOR OR AUDITOR (FORM 51-101F2)
To the Board of Directors of Vermilion Energy Inc. (the "Company"):
1. | We have prepared an evaluation of the Company’s reserves data as at December 31, 2010. The reserves data are estimates of proved reserves and probable reserves and related future net revenue as at December 31, 2010, estimated using forecast prices and costs. |
2. | The reserves data are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the reserves data based on our evaluation. |
We carried out our evaluation in accordance with standards set out in the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation Handbook (the "COGE Handbook") prepared jointly by the Society of Petroleum Evaluation Engineers (Calgary Chapter) and the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy & Petroleum (Petroleum Society).
3. | Those standards require that we plan and perform an evaluation to obtain reasonable assurance as to whether the reserves data are free of material misstatement. An evaluation also includes assessing whether the reserves data are in accordance with principles and definitions in the COGE Handbook. |
4. | The following table sets forth the estimated future net revenue (before deduction of income taxes) attributed to proved plus probable reserves, estimated using forecast prices and costs and calculated using a discount rate of 10 percent, included in the reserves data of the Company evaluated by us for the year ended December 31, 2010, and identifies the respective portions thereof that we have audited, evaluated and reviewed and reported on to the Company's board of directors: |
Independent Qualified Reserves Evaluator | Description and Preparation Date of Evaluation Report | Location of Reserves (Country or Foreign Geographic Area) | Net Present Value of Future Net Revenue (before income taxes, 10% discount rate - $M) |
Audited | Evaluated | Reviewed | Total |
GLJ Petroleum Consultants | February 9, 2011 | Australia | - | 735,393 | - | 735,393 |
GLJ Petroleum Consultants | February 9, 2011 | Canada | - | 647,069 | - | 647,069 |
GLJ Petroleum Consultants | February 9, 2011 | France | - | 1,143,741 | - | 1,143,741 |
GLJ Petroleum Consultants | February 9, 2011 | Ireland | - | 297,289 | | 297,289 |
GLJ Petroleum Consultants | February 9, 2011 | Netherlands | - | 353,007 | - | 353,007 |
TOTAL | | | | 3,176,498 | | 3,176,498 |
5. | In our opinion, the reserves data respectively evaluated by us have, in all material respects, been determined and are in accordance with the COGE Handbook. |
6. | We have no responsibility to update our reports referred to in paragraph 4 for events and circumstances occurring after their respective preparation dates. |
7. | Because the reserves data are based on judgements regarding future events, actual results will vary and the variations may be material. |
EXECUTED as to our reports referred to above:
GLJ Petroleum Consultants Ltd., Calgary, Alberta, Canada, February 9, 2011
“Jodi L. Anhorn” | | |
Jodi L. Anhorn, M.Sc., P.Eng. Vice President | |